authorIDs
stringlengths
15
32
fullText
listlengths
8
1k
cluster
int64
0
511
retrieval_idx
listlengths
499
499
reddit_dump_---Captain-Obvious--
[ [ "I wouldn't be so hard on your ½ sister, at least give her a chance, sounds to me like she couldn't handle knowing she had a brother out there that she couldn't know. At least give her a chance. \nI have a similar situation except I'm the biological father and can't know my son. He is only 13 so think of trying to deal with all this at that age... Arguments would turn to \"you're not my father\" ect, yeah not going to do that to a kid who already has a great dad. Your family is your family, as you know nothing has changed. The only thing that can possibly come of this (if you choose) is your family will grow larger. Go talk to the facebook woman see if you can piece things together. Worst case scenario you learn about your own history.", "650" ], [ "well that's just weird. what does a guy stand behind it? what's the point of a flame deflector on a road if nothing is near it lol. there is empty space everywhere but that one point in the road needs a flame deflector... I hate when answers bring more questions then they answer... well google here I come. See you in 3 hours life.", "449" ], [ "Serious question, Why use mechmarket when ebay exists? On ebay you have buyer and seller protection, on mechmarket you have none. Who in their right mind would choose to blindly trust an anonymous seller with no protection? I know many of you have used mechmarket and I do see things there that spark my interest... but I trust no one. Is there a way to protect yourself there as a buyer/seller besides rep check things like karma and Heatwire?", "118" ], [ "I haven't experienced that as an ebay seller. I refurbished and sold laptops for a while. As a seller you have to put in the work to prove your case before you even sell something. Take plenty of photos and even videos when you can. I had a buyer tell me the laptop wasn't functioning, I offered a refund if they sent it back but they refused and opened a case against me. I had dated photo and video evidence uploaded to my photobuket before i even shipped it out. I just showed ebay that and I won my case. On mechmarket there would be no case. The seller would issue a chargeback and keep my product and probably shit talk me to try to ruin my seller rep as well.", "467" ], [ "In his story ebay sided with the buyer, likely because his friend didn't put in the effort to record the serial number and show adequate proof that that serial was not banned. If he had, ebay would have sided with him. I don't agree that ebay always sides with the buyer or is bias. The burden of proof is on the on the accused in either direction. If the accused does actually provide evidence contrary to the accusation, the other side then can counter or let ebay decide from there. Either way at the end ebay looks at both arguments and makes a decision based on the evidence. It's a form of arbitration you agree to when accepting the terms of use. Ebay decides in the end, but it's still a system based on evidence you need to provide.", "467" ], [ "my thought was basically just replace the spring with 2 opposing neodymium magnets, different strength magnets instead of different strength springs ect. the magnets would be like tiny donuts. I never even knew there were magnetic switches for keyboards at all, I'll have to look into those to see if it's similar. \n\nEDIT: Super skillfully drawn MS paint rendering of my lovely idea.\n_URL_0_", "89" ], [ "I haven't sold since before they made the split from ebay. It used to be real easy to just call and resolve any issues and during disputes they would lock the funds in place. You couldn't issue a chargeback until the case was resolved. That was due to the ebay side of things. If they have those policies now for just any old sale anywhere, then I can definitely feel safe selling on the mechmarket. I wasn't aware of that, If I do start making artisans I'll look into it.", "118" ], [ "A few days of weird sleeping schedule isn't a disorder. A few months or more that's something to be concerned about. A few days can be effected by a number of things, lack of food, stressful situations ect. I'm no doctor but I highly doubt you have anything to worry about. \n\nEDIT: Just to add to this, going to bed at 8am regularly is a good way to develop a sleeping disorder lol. I have had sleep isues my whole life and all through high school I did the whole no sleep till the sun comes up lifestyle. Now at 33, I couldn't sleep like a normal human if my life depended on it.", "41" ], [ "This exactly. It's not just that he is is very religious, it's the type of religeous he is manages to offend most people. He flat out says he has no respect for people who don't belive in god, like he would just give you the hand and deem you sub-human. There is also his mindset of relationships and women. One of those guys who thinks a woman place is in the kitchen and that it's human nature for men to cheat so his woman shouldn't be allowed to complain about it or some shit. \nI used to like the <PERSON> show as a kid, He was an enjoyable actor.. But <PERSON> is he a shitty human being.", "513" ] ]
389
[ 1594, 23980, 2908, 723, 21683, 19406, 17478, 21882, 2491, 15030, 22560, 24261, 2523, 14286, 8483, 22275, 16513, 8686, 10379, 13112, 7676, 430, 25082, 7415, 4043, 11777, 2355, 15226, 11958, 14490, 8185, 12283, 19050, 22508, 5203, 864, 25108, 4982, 23368, 8906, 24186, 5747, 8840, 9599, 16852, 25156, 14039, 6568, 17253, 3596, 23779, 10715, 11902, 9393, 4445, 25451, 6254, 6763, 3824, 17759, 6126, 11696, 7920, 22919, 14553, 25071, 8610, 4423, 22139, 11664, 11683, 8454, 1840, 3747, 18263, 5009, 19855, 5633, 7878, 16317, 3241, 7710, 22847, 1783, 8342, 11064, 21424, 19910, 13341, 16101, 9646, 13272, 15813, 9733, 23329, 14217, 3618, 21983, 21402, 5426, 11427, 5204, 13835, 9630, 10948, 418, 2477, 20665, 24188, 24571, 3621, 4956, 12323, 3087, 24358, 22826, 12301, 10915, 18072, 2823, 19852, 987, 10702, 14512, 15529, 21282, 20398, 23063, 16929, 23604, 11537, 11636, 11820, 10565, 7515, 13473, 18196, 22068, 13353, 3806, 17281, 24343, 15776, 1981, 4844, 53, 21393, 8151, 16739, 4053, 24724, 3127, 17340, 5086, 19345, 14587, 13917, 12539, 24162, 3142, 24157, 6962, 14716, 1433, 5388, 16278, 11443, 16526, 8472, 8144, 630, 1332, 12068, 3355, 9744, 19974, 344, 7178, 11462, 12106, 25299, 16104, 17783, 17297, 17975, 9421, 14859, 19496, 23257, 5457, 25219, 10474, 6964, 17693, 8186, 7150, 19643, 14018, 2497, 21079, 19234, 23108, 11216, 5537, 8925, 17525, 19867, 17079, 2362, 23208, 21045, 11888, 12027, 22864, 19570, 1851, 7282, 6069, 22022, 25175, 1864, 4062, 1327, 20765, 12147, 14875, 21647, 1055, 19161, 6292, 7593, 23079, 10437, 4438, 2959, 4914, 23898, 22176, 5198, 23026, 13758, 8195, 16309, 18510, 8792, 12089, 21885, 16343, 11020, 4131, 6275, 1238, 722, 16441, 20978, 4851, 19459, 660, 21386, 6119, 17945, 20126, 12473, 13274, 6029, 10175, 22344, 7960, 17929, 24431, 10522, 1010, 21142, 4871, 6625, 8231, 14560, 9792, 9384, 3711, 1024, 21181, 11995, 2190, 12545, 9810, 6074, 7553, 11666, 14597, 14743, 14011, 16055, 6214, 3829, 12909, 23573, 20923, 22360, 5282, 25341, 1312, 6291, 12408, 11471, 7158, 9938, 24682, 2695, 12124, 518, 3821, 15758, 1715, 24868, 2753, 4177, 13406, 24788, 9674, 4743, 6671, 25264, 8136, 25158, 19344, 11889, 8637, 4733, 17087, 2447, 145, 17685, 3603, 23986, 16534, 655, 5563, 19100, 20611, 2289, 10723, 2741, 8371, 139, 15485, 1505, 24845, 19804, 2337, 15531, 4625, 16362, 18678, 8767, 19801, 9901, 2039, 3976, 16755, 21798, 1629, 2929, 23397, 8067, 8008, 19741, 131, 7713, 4711, 16048, 23981, 23592, 24440, 17847, 9270, 10933, 20875, 6711, 10681, 17884, 8028, 15861, 10982, 6545, 2818, 20078, 24980, 21549, 438, 607, 9389, 24084, 11887, 16923, 20406, 5087, 13492, 22697, 18090, 11063, 920, 11042, 4575, 431, 14920, 13251, 13317, 1322, 13603, 858, 17521, 17634, 2196, 14505, 21961, 19094, 23496, 6718, 9866, 21096, 17363, 21739, 16950, 11112, 13029, 16951, 10727, 1251, 20356, 4836, 24861, 10375, 6594, 7015, 15519, 2007, 11604, 16756, 24108, 5917, 20900, 18163, 4593, 20327, 8619, 21066, 18435, 19251, 24432, 20274, 3265, 20874, 19416, 4017, 20336, 8549, 5289, 19679, 4971, 279, 9547, 18764, 2686, 10462, 9376, 13666, 21588, 10765, 170, 6772, 16199, 18074, 1352, 24120, 3296, 24215, 12245, 20882, 16184, 14947, 11760, 14445, 20518, 5078, 18746, 6265, 7674, 20465, 22600, 24698, 14552, 2498, 6218, 10060, 1736, 1589, 6152, 3310 ]
reddit_dump_---Ed---
[ [ "Delusion is when you believe someone tells you that you can use Bitcoin system by using completely different system (Lightning). Ignorance and idiocy is when we point it out to you and you still believe that shit.\n\nBitcoin Cash is Bitcoin because it works exactly how Bitcoin is meant to work and Bitcoin Core doesn't, Lightning is not scaling o Bitcoin, Lightning is that completely different system that works nothing like a Bitcoin.\n\nIf you can't see this plain logic you are dumber then I give you credit for.", "986" ], [ "You people are so brainwashed by Capitalism ;-)\n\nDid you read what I wrote? US Capitalists created Nazis and WWII and all wars since... they created Nazi Germany to destroy communism, and communists are the ones that actually fought against and defeated the Nazis... 60 million people died in WWII, and many more after (3 million in Vietnam, which was also started based on a lie, same <PERSON>, 911, WMDs... this list is very long)... let that sink in and think a bit more before you make those ignorant statements.", "1009" ], [ "It is amassing how I state facts what actually happened and I get down-voted... I've said this before and I'll say it again, Americans are in fact most brainwashed and most ignorant people in the world. They think they know everything, they think they are greatest nation in the world, they feel patriotic, they think Capitalism means free markets and freedom, and reality is that they actually know very little, that US is actually the worst nation in the world as it bullies everyone else, they are clueless what Capitalism actually is and how it works and that it has nothing to do with free markets, in fact they don't even know the difference in PRODUCTION and MARKETS... its just amassing... completely brainwashed by Capitalist system.\n\nSometimes I wonder why the fuck I bother, I go out of my way to defend Bitcoin system and PoW and I go to YouTube and make a bold move that Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin, while everyone else still tries to argue with Core and Blockstream and do same crap that doesn't work for years, and then when I realise that Bitcoin's PoW system is actually same principle as Communist ideology of rewarding those that are productive and not those that have capital, I get attacked here... fucking brainwashed idiots.", "227" ], [ "Bitcoin's PoW is communist system, not capitalist.\n\nCapitalism uses PoS principle and rewards those with capital (STAKE) while Communism (actual Communism, not that propaganda shit you are told by the Capitalist system, and even State Capitalism what former USSR and China have/had) rewards those that do the work, which is what Bitcoin mining system is based on.\n\nAlso, anarcho capitalism cannot work, as natural law says that in was absence of state (temporarily) and you still had Capitalism economic system, over time there will be some Capitalist business(es) that will get big enough to create their own state like rule, which actually ALREADY HAPPENED in the US and most western capitalist nations. Just what to you think is the Deep State?\n\nMorons that say that PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKERS are Marxists and/or Communists are so stupid and brainwashed, it wants to make my head explode... fact that these bankers bribed the state right from the start, as they were very rich people already, to give them legal power to control supply of money and do whatever they want in their PRIVATELY OWNED FOR PROFIT BUSINESS, which is by definition a CAPITALIST business is proof that they are and always were CAPITALISTS and could not be more opposite to Marxists and Communists.\n\nJust what the fuck is wrong with so many of you?\n\nPS: It actually doesn't matter what some brainwashed person or masses think, what matters is that Bitcoin works and continues to work the way it was designed and PoW is maintained as this is the main and only reason it can't be hi-jcaked by any rich fucker, especially the bankers. Don't ever allow yourself to be brainwashed into thinking that PoW needs to be changed or replaced... if that was to ever happen... Bitcoin will be dead and defeated.\n\nAlso what people miss, those that think non-mining nodes need to be part of decision making, is that USERS are USERS of the system that MINERS PROVIDE TO THEM. You as a user do not have the power, and you should never have the power, to dictate miners anything. You as a user can chose to either use the system miners provide to you or not, and that's it. User should never dictate miners what they should do. Miners must always be their own \"masters\" and NEVER have someone else tell them what they can or can't do. This is most fundamental rule that must never be broken... if it is... Bitcoin is fucked... and we would have to start all over again.", "986" ], [ "If there was no state, Capitalist would create it as someone very rich can afford to buy out his own police and military. Just how do you think state was created in the first place? It was done using FORCE.\n\nIf you were to eliminate this political state that is meant to be democratic (but its not because the Capitalists control them), you will end up with Capitalist business(es) become the state themselves.\n\nEvery Capitalist business is like a kingdom, and the bigger it gets the more power it has. That Anarcho Capitalism so many of you dream about, can never work. The only way to have sustainable society is by getting rid of Capitalism completely and getting rid of central banks (they are both PoS systems) and using PoW systems only... for money that is Bitcoin, and for production (which is what Economic system is) use worker co-ops (what is modern version of communism).", "101" ], [ "Worker Co-ops is not subset of capitalism because as I keep pointing out, workers are doing work, which earns them profitability proportional to amount of work they do in that business. There is no \"must\" in ownership there, it is most natural thing that worker own their own productivity.\n\nDemocracy is indeed majority rules, but this is based on negotiation among workers, it is way to not allow anyone to pull in their ow direction, the way state owned or privately owned business does.\n\nAnd don't talk about Venezuela, you think issues there are caused by Socialism? Did you know America created war in 6 nations in Middle East and has fucked up Middle East, arming and funding Islamic extremists to create \"rebelion\" (which America does all the time) who took oil fields and were selling it very cheap (why crude oil prices collapses) which affected Venezuela GDP as most of their income is from oil exports? How about economic sanctions imposed on Venezuela also by America? How about the same fake \"rebels\" that are fighting in Venezuela, did you know they are created by America also?\n\nYou have no idea what is caused by what, you only repeat the shit that you hear on MSM which is also controlled by Capitalists... everything you hear in the US is propaganda.\n\nCapitalism is in its nature exploitative system. Someone that creates a business takes risk and has expense only initially, after some time this decreases and eventually completely stops, these capitalists end up doing absolutely no work, yet they continue to take all the profits. The share owners also do zero work, yet they also get profits... while the workers get some fixed wage, and their wages at best, follow inflation, while profits of people that do no work increases way more... this is basic maths and everyone should be able to understand this, if only you stopped being brainwashed and started using some common sense based on facts and reality and not some narrative that is not backed by reality.", "101" ], [ "In ideal situation it would be best not to have forced anything, but this is not always doable, in fact it is very rare that things (systems) change in peaceful way, and reason for this is because people who benefit from the existing system, will do their best (and worst) to maintain it so they can maintain their power & benefits.\n\nCapitalism is no different.\n\nThis is why Revolutions happen violently, as at some point the balance of power shifts, power not being only political (which is what state is) but natural (which is what masses of people create) which forces a change and normally punishes those that used to control the previous system (Monarchs, Capitalists, Slave owners, Feudalists).\n\nSo ideally, this change should be gradual, but for this 2 things are needed:\n\n1. People need to be aware of how things actually work, in case of Capitalism they need to realise that Capitalism does not mean or creates Free Markets, people need to know that Capitalists do not do any work (I am talking about owners of big businesses, not your small business Capitalist who hires small amount of people and who's business is local) and that they extract wealth from work of others\n\n2. and then use that knowledge to start creating businesses that don't work like Capitalist businesses, but like worker co-ops... if workers don't have capital to start it, rich people can lend them the money and workers will do their thing, they will organise no different to how business operates already, with only difference being that all workers cooperate and collectively make decisions and share profits.\n\nThis is the reason why it is said that communism needs higher conscience of the people, as if you don't know you are being exploited how can you ever want to change anything?\n\nBitcoin system is doing this change in gradual way and non-violent way... it can replace the fiat and central banks system, but as I say, people need to first understand how existing system works, to understand that its a scam and that it benefits only those that control it (same as <PERSON> does in his own business) and then to use that knowledge and apply it by starting to convert their wealth into Bitcoin system (Bitcoin Cash)... and if everyone does this, the change can actually be very quick... but still gradual.\n\nI hope you understand what I mean, I don't know if I am being trolled or not, but some people claim that I am not making any sense, that my grammar and punctuation is bad, one guy even said I have no class, if you think this also, then sorry but this is the best I can come up with without spending lot of time re-writing it all like I am writing a book... I write how I think, which is why I tend to be very direct.", "101" ], [ "No, I am not violent and don't like violence. I specifically said that best change is gradual one but that it needs education first, and I also said that most of the time change is abrupt and violent because this is how nature works when there is pressure from one side suppressing the other side, the way Capitalists suppress the workers... at some point the workers rebel and bring down capitalists. This almost happened in 1930's as because of introduced Socialism (what people would call Keynsian Capitalism) Capitalist survived and wasn't overthrown.\n\nAnd what gulags? Why mention that? Do you know what Work camps were in WWII? Do you know they were making profits for the Capitalists... have you seen <PERSON>'s list? Why do you think at the gate of <PERSON>, says \"<PERSON>\" (work makes you free)?\n\nWhy did US bankers fund Nazis? Because they are communists or socialists? Some people literally say the FE and private central bankers are communists... which is one of the most idiotic things one can say (and think).\n\nWhy does the Capitalist US torture people and keeps them locked up without trial for years?\n\nWhy does the Capitalist US always stage false flag attacks and lies to its people, then attacks other nations, accusing them of shit that Us always does, and them always protecting the interests of the Capitalists business?\n\nUS accuses Iran an Russia and China and DPRK about how they want to take over the world how they will use nukes, when in fact US and NATO has been doing that all this time, and the ONLY nation to ever actually USE those nukes... ON CIVILIANS.... TWICE!\n\n<PERSON>, you are way over your head there, don't make me give you a lecture about who did what and why... I'll leave it here now, thing whatever the fuck you want, it doesn't make it any more true.", "778" ], [ "Still massive difference between Twitter and Facebook and Bitcoin CASH system, the first two are controlled by the globalists (top richest Capitalists) and CIA has their paws all over it spying on everyone, there is so much direct and indirect censorship, while Bitcoin CASH system is not part of the globalist scheme, its in fact against it, there is no censorship and it can (and I hope it will) change the world for the better, and I can't say the same for Twitter or Facebook.", "986" ], [ "I think you are stupid because you think LN will be great, and worse, if you believe that narrative from Core that LN is scaling of Bitcoin. There is no such thing as Bitcoin Lightning, they are two separate and very different types of systems. Do you want me to elaborate more? If yes, feel free to watch my videos so I don't have to write it all up all the time\n\n_URL_0_\n\nI made a video to explain why there is no such thing as Bitcoin Lightning, but I touch on the subject on few other videos also.\n\nJust so you are aware, even if they get LN to work every time you try it, it can never provide what Bitcoin system can. LN can never be used as decentralised payment system and Bitcoin system can (and already does), which explains why bankers are funding these Core guys to fuck BTC up, and explains why they are attacking Bitcoin Cash.\n\nSo there you have it... up to you what you want to do now.", "986" ], [ "Miners are meant to have full control over what code they want to run, and it is not up to you or any coder or any other miner or someone running a non-mining node, to dictate them what code they can or can't use. That is what decentralised system means... no one gets to dictate others... if you want to run some other code, you are free to do so, wealth or not someone will want to use the system/blockchain you want to use, that it up to each and every person on their own also and you don't get to dictate them.", "831" ], [ "There are other things that ARE immoral. The MSM narrating propaganda is immoral, them doing so to fabricate support for attacking some other nation and kill people, is even more so immoral, being patriotic and enlisting into paid (professional) military then going to kill people in some nation that never even attacked you, is also very immoral... lying to its people is also very immoral, lying in general is immoral... where do I stop?", "30" ], [ "Yes, there is a difference, one is a criminal activity which results in forced immoral activity, the other is voluntary (or sometimes just out of greed also) immoral activity.\n\nI am not saying people who want to make porn are evil or something, as long as they are not forcing anyone to do something they don't want, but it is still immoral activity. Some might not think or say so, I for one do think like this.", "518" ], [ "You didn't answer my question... and no... my daughter will not be doing porn, if she did, she'd be dead to me, but this won't happen as I have good stories and life experiences to teach her, and lot of things most people don't even know about. While I agree that she will have to make her own choices about what she will do in her life, and kids are always rebellious, I can't see her doing this, I think I would have to be pretty fucked up dad if she was to do such a thing... this is just my very honest opinion, you can take that as you wish... people can disagree with me, its their own thing, their life and their kids.", "518" ], [ "BCh already has that use case... working already. Volatility will settle over the years, yes it is still too volatile to be used as cash, but reality is no one complains if it goes up in value... right? So I think we're good and set, its just matter of time.\n\nI don't really care if someone wants to do porn, its not my place, but that is still not a moral activity. People need to understand this and be honest about it. I am not calling them evil at all, I don't think they are bad people just because they want to make money like that, or whatever other reason they have for doing it, because as long as they are not forcing anyone to do something they don't want, I can't say its a bad thing... but morals are still morals.\n\nI think its also a good thing that this process is gradual and not sudden as it allows people all around the world to adjust slowly, so its not some violent revolution, which, while generally create better society later on, they always have some bad consequences also.", "1008" ], [ "BTC fools, Core, Blockstream narrate propaganda that Lighting is scaling of Bitcoin. This is simply not true and is outright a lie. They are two very different systems, and they share no commonalities in the way they work at all. So calling one system as scaling of another system is 100% lie and nothing but propaganda. They know this, but they do this as no one would give a fuck about Lighting network, so they use Bitcoin name to lure unaware users into thinking its still Bitcoin.... it is not.\n\nI and others call them out on their lies, and we have every right to do so.... if they don't like being called out for lying and propaganda, then they should not be doing it in the first place, but they keep doing it so... they can get fucked and you also for defending them.", "986" ], [ "5 years would be great indeed, but who knows... I think as soon as next market crash happens, this time will be last fiat market crash and lot of people and investors will flood into crypto... I don't know the future and I am not rich enough to socially engineer it the way some rich fucks can and do... so we'll see... fingers crossed :-)", "1008" ], [ "How do we exaggerate when we started from zero just few months ago, BTC has 8 years head start and went through exact same cycle in its early days, BCH is doing it quicker though... so I would say you just can't admit the (for you sad) reality that BTC has negative adoption and BCH is positive. You know, if you made a wrong choice, you can still change your mind, you just need to be honest to yourself about it. Truth doesn't hurt when accepted, it hurts when its ignored.", "986" ], [ "What does number of posts have to do with reality that Core/Blockstream who are working for bankers, attacked usability of Bitcoin system in BTC and brainwashed people (many of which are just bots pretending to be real users) attack Bitcoin supporters also, fell for Core/Blockstream's propaganda... and now we are defending Bitcoin system by creating Bitcoin Cash blockchain and continuing to provide and support Bitcoin system in Bitcoin Cash?\n\nAttack on Bitcoin and its supporters is started long time ago by Core & Blockstream and their associates and hired trolls and YouTubers like <PERSON> and few others... so once again... we are not attacking anyone, we are defending ourselves and we have every right to do so.\n\nFuck Core, Fuck Blockstream, Fuck anyone that sides with them... I don' t give a shit if they are paid trolls or just brainless fools, either way, they are attacking someone else which should simply not be done.", "986" ], [ "Core devs ARE trying to kill Bitcoin usability in BTC, they put out some propaganda saying how miners are centralised, and how Bitcoin system can't scale, and few other things which are simply not true, and the fact that we know they are funded by (read: WORKING FOR) bankers, explains perfectly why they are doing all this. You have to be very ignorant and brainwashed not to see this reality... which some people are and why they side with Core, and many other new users simply don't know any better, same way as lot of people trust what they are told by the media and their government.\n\nBanker's are not that dumb, I never said they are, which is why they are attacking Bitcoin Cash and its users, and no one else... coincidence? I don't think so. This is very obvious to me as I know what is going on in the world.", "986" ], [ "**You are forced indirectly** if you are brainwashed to think that BTC is only and true Bitcoin, and that Lightning is scaling of Bitcoin, which is the propaganda narrative they use to trick people... **as BTC simply doesn't have capacity to support all (brainwashed) users and the RBF crap they added is additional tool of theirs to indirectly force you to use the Lightning**, as they advertise it as scaling of Bitcoin, and cheaper version, which I and many others, know is pure propaganda.\n\nLightning is not scaling of Bitcoin, it is a completely different system which works nothing like a Bitcoin system... and them calling it as such is lie and propaganda to trick unaware users into using the Lightning.", "986" ], [ "Was I not clear enough when I said that its immoral? Do you even know what moral values are? Doing something stupid is not the same as doing something that is very degrading. Think carefully what you are saying... if you had someone you love do this, how would you feel about it? I know how I would feel about it. If you would not care, well that is your own thing, it is still not a moral thing to do... not to me anyway, and I have to say to most people also. Its one thing to watch it, but its another to do it.\n\nPS: I watched a video of someone who is looking for a gf/companion/etc and what he said was, he would not like the girl to be seing other man at the same time, how that is not nice, how he would not want to date/be with girl like that, but then says how he is doing that all the time (being with more than 1 girl at the same time), which makes that person a hypocrite... and most men are like this... they don't give a fuck when they do something like that and they want to call themselves as good people, etc, but have the nerve to judge others differently... I know any father if he is any normal, would/could not stand seeing his daughter do porn, but most still watch it.. we all know why... so most people pretend how they are fine with it, but deep down, if it was to come to that... they would act differently... because lot of people are hypocrites.\n\n**Golden rule is you should not do to others what you don't want others do to you.**\n\nSo if you not fine with someone cheating on you, you should not cheat on others... and same is with porn... if you are not fine with your own daughter doing porn, you should not be saying how its fine for other people's daughters to do it and that its moral... as when you do, it makes you a hypocrite also.", "518" ], [ "Just google search US poverty and check it, lot of charts with stats, mind you stats can and lot of times are manipulated to suit some agenda, and I don't live in the US (and I am glad I don't to be honest for various reasons) so I can't say I know this first hand by living there, but even this personal experience can vary a lot depending on what area you live in, who you hang out with, etc... but overall, there is lot of poverty in the US, but US is not the only 1st world country to have this... Tokyo has some 50K homeless people in that city alone, which is a lot, Hong Kong is horrible also, and US has one of the highest crime rates in the world per capita, and statistics show some 1/2 of Americans don't even have $400 for some unexpected thing to pay and live paycheck to paycheck... and many are homeless also.\n\nIt is a mistake to compare yourself to those nations, you should compare to other rich nations, and you will see US is worse off.", "954" ], [ "Again, why are you comparing it with 3rd world countries? $10 per day in US won't get you anything, maybe 2 shitty meals... while in 3rd world countries it gets you shit load more, so you can't compare the two. Compare it with European nations for example, or Canada, or Australia, NZ, Japan, China, etc... in none of these countries you have such high number of homeless, crime rate, people living on bare minimum for survival.", "519" ], [ "I did read your comment, but I don't agree with you. When something is immoral you know it straight away, the way that guy doesn't want to date a girl that cheated on her existing bf/partner with him... he knows its not moral but he does it himself... that is hypocrisy. same way saying porn is not immoral when some girl you have no feelings for, just because you have no feelings involved (but watch them do it yourself and fantasize etc) but if you were to have someone you know and have feelings for do the same, you feel its not so moral any more... again... hypocrisy.\n\nAlso, the norm does not mean something is moral, watching porn is norm now but is still not moral. And I didn't call the sex workers irrational, I am just saying that its not moral. They surely have their reasoning for doing it, but in order to do it, you must ditch aside your morality, and those that have no morals, well it just makes it easier for them to do this. I would not recommend doing it to anyone, and most people that do do it, do so out of bad situations, being on drugs, etc which lowers self esteem, making you do things which you wouldn't if you didn't have to. I know money is majorly attractive, especially for \"producers\" but I just can't see it as something having any morality in it.", "518" ], [ "by the way, you are like this other guy <PERSON>, makes some claim, even says how easy it is to explain it, yet he doesn't explain anything. That's what I call someone being full of shit. let me ask you, how many countries you lived in? How about cities? Which ones? How many languages you speak? How many types of religions did you experience near you, as in, you lives in society that has them all? How many economic systems did you live in? How many educational systems did you study in? Go answer those and I'll tell you mine.", "98" ], [ "How the fuck is Capitalism great when it is one that allows rich people to get richer off of work of others? That is exploitative system in its most basic core.\n\nThe essence of Capitalism and people who want to invest their money, is to look for opportunities in which they can put in their capital then hire other people, which translates into: I use my money, and pay other people to do all the work, and I get the profits... **that is just fucked up** and this is actually what Capitalists do.\n\nTake a singer as another example, someone who is talented in singing but doesn't have money to make a record, so the opportunists (capitalists) see this talented person, makes a contract in which they say they will fund their production and advertising of their album, and they need to sing, other people will do the advertising, promoting, technical shit to produce the album in studio, and so on... and they all get paid a fixed salary (or maybe get some bonus) but **reality is the producer, this opportunist person, the capitalist, is the one that didn't do any work, has no talent in singing or making records... its all other people doing the work, and yet he gets the profits and get richer...** rinse and repeat... THAT is how Capitalism works and what its based on.\n\nIf Capitalism was so fucking great.. why are capitalists always funding wars and starting wars, bribing government to dot hem favours... those wars are not started by communists, its always started by some fucking monarch, or capitalist, or both.\n\nIf Capitalism was so great, why do we have so much poverty in the world? There is plenty of everything on this plantey yet handful of people have more wealth then 1/2 of the rest of the country... if you people can't see anything wrong with that, you are literally brainwashed.\n\nI am sorry, but you people simply don't get it... you might see how monetary system is fucked up, but you can't see that economic one (capitalism) is fucked up equally.", "101" ], [ "<PERSON>, if that's his real name, has a short circuit somewhere in his brain, or maybe few of them. I don't know how anyone could think that he is intelligent.\n\nEDIT:\nOn second thought, maybe he could be referring to what the user sees. For example i have PayPal connected to my CC, so when I make purchase and pay with PayPal, say on eBay, I pay the amount the seller asks+shipping if applicable, so the cost of using PayPal seems to be zero, which is lower then fee in BCH no matter how small the fee is.\n\nBut as we know that PayPal charges the banks for the service, and banks charge us, the cost of using it is not zero as it seems on the surface, so it depends how you look at it. On surface it does look cheaper (for free) but under the hood, its not.", "495" ], [ "I don't like the \"Cash\" as any base unit denomination.\n\nYou can say, \"hey you got any cash?\" or \"How much cash you got?\" but not \"I got 2 (or x-amount of) cash\"... it just sounds stupid.\n\nI am perfectly ok with using satoshi's or bits as unit denominations.\n\nAlso Cash is horrible name for a unit of anything as cash is like word sand, not quantifiable. There is no such thing as 1 cash or 2 cash... same as there is no such thing as 1 sand or 2 sands. There is 1 GRAIN of sand but not 1 sand... its just sand.. and it just cash... it doesn't have a quantity so it cannot be used as unit denomination.", "170" ], [ "And who are they, what you people like to call \"cronies\"?\n\nWhat are bankers that funded nazis? What are industrialists that traded with Nazis?\n\nThey are CAPITALISTS, all of them. So you can keep living in denial and brainwashed propaganda that capitalist society made you believe, this is what actually happened.\n\nCapitalism is a system which allows people with lot of capital to look for opportunities to make money off of other people's work. That is what Capitalism is based on. Its is exploitative system no different to monarchies and feudalism and slavery, only difference is, the capitalist doesn't own you, but he does own your work.\n\nAnd until people in the western (capitalist) world realise this, nothing will change, thing will keep going down hill, more wars, more economic inequality, more homelessness and more poverty for the masses.", "101" ], [ "Capitalism is not state enforcement of private property. Capitalism is a type of economic system (economic system is what defines how businesses are organised and structured, and what many don't know, is not what trade is, trade is exchange of produces things, and economic system is production of it) which allows (as it gives power of decision making) by those that have capital, to hire work of others (owning their work) and profit from it (from other people's work).\n\nReason Capitalists are behind WWI and WWII is as I said, bankers and industrialists, mainly from the US and GB, but also many European monarchies, have funded and traded with the Nazis before and even during WWII. They have been arming and creating terrorism since.. to this day. ISIS, Al-Nusra, Al-Qaeda, Mujahedens, are all cration of the CIA/USA, funded by the capitalists. I should also mention that CIA was formed with ex German Nazis, who were gives false IDs and taken to US after the war, escaping prosecution, and they ran it. CIA is very much a Nazi organisation... to this day.\n\nThe USSR, the dreaded Communists, were great allies during the war... Germany and Japan were enemy... what the fuck happened after war ended? All of a sudden Communists became enemy and enemy became an ally? You don't find anything strange there?\n\nAs I said... you are very much brainwashed by the system... a capitalist system... because those capitalists control everything, education books, all forms of media... including your government... and this is not just now, but since its inception.\n\nI know these are very hard words but it is a harsh reality... in order to see it, you need to go down the rabbit hole and start checking lof of the hidden and untold history, which some historians tried to tell us, but the system that is in power doesn't want you to know this, as if you did you would realise that they are the bad guys.\n\nhere's few videos you should watch just to give you a taste of how fucked up the US and GB government is and how the bankers and industrialists (who are capitalists) control them, and you, and most of the world through military imperialism:\n\n_URL_2_\n\n_URL_0_\n\n_URL_1_\n\n_URL_3_", "101" ], [ "So, you lost respect for me, because I keep exposing the real nature of Capitalism, which is exploiting people and their work, and you think you are so much better than be even though you are fine with this Capitalist system, which you say yourself is not perfect?\n\nWhatever mate... reality is that most humans are NOT cruel, only assholes use that as an excuse to keep having this shitty system... we, humane people, want to do better.\n\nJust because you were born into better section of the world, just because nature might gave you higher IQ, easier access to everything, you don't see just how shitty it is to be on the other side of that... if you did, you would be singing a different tune.\n\nPS: keep your respect for yourself, I don't need your respect.", "101" ], [ "> No. \"Capitalism\" is private ownership and exclusive control of property, including the \"means of production\". Ergo, **you own yourself** (the smallest unit of the means of production) **and the fruits of your labor**. I.e. self-ownership. Everything else follows from that basic axiom.\n\nThis is where you, and every other pro-capitalist, is wrong... Capitalist doesn't just own his own work, he owns **other people's work** and that is the essence of Capitalism.\n\nIf you work in a factory, and you get paid a wage (you are hired by the owner) you as a productive worker, **do not own your work**, the capitalist does, which is why, when technology advances, and we end up with computers and machines making actual work easier, or not even needed by humans, the worker does not get any higher wage, the worker end up working same hours and produces more, and that is more products for the capitalist, who owns everything, to sell and get himself more profits.\n\nCapitalism has promised that people will need to work less and easier with advancement of tech, but reality is this has not happened, and will not happen, because main interest of the capitalist is to get as much as he can return on his investment.\n\nWhen tech advances, workers produce more, but their wage does nor follow their productivity, which means capitalists get more profits, and get richer and richer... and this is **exactly** what we have seen happening in the world.\n\nYou can deny it all you want, that is the reality of things... and this is not so called Crony Capitalism, this is actual Capitalism, its how it works, it is designed to work this way.", "101" ], [ "1. they are brainwashed and look at their own self interest only. They don't know what Bitcoin really is or how it works or why it got created in the first place, all of which matters if you want to enter this \"market\"... so when they buy into BTC just because they see its called Bitcoin, they assume its the real Bitcoin (and everything else is shit), they made wrong investment choice, and now they cant stomach real and fair competition. They know Bitcoin Cash is greatest threat to them, and <PERSON> is siding with Bitcoin Cash (I do too) and this is why they see him as enemy now (now they call him a criminal, but hypocritically, before they didn't)\n\n2. they are most likely also jealous as he got richer from promoting Bitcoin system (which is BTS then and BCH now).", "986" ], [ "I know this will roughen up a few feathers, but so be it, I will still speak my mind.\n\nReality is that Capitalism is an exploitative type of Economic System In this video I explain why. Anyone that still thinks that Capitalism is great and shit, is either on the side of receiving end (being a Capitalist themselves) or is still in a good paying job, so they have not yet felt the harsh reality of this system as many other people have.\n\nI have said before and I have said it again, Bitcoin mining PoW is not a Capitalist system because the miners are workers and they get rewarded 100% of their work they put in into mining. It means the miner gets 100% reward for its productivity of mining Bitcoin. Capitalist system only rewards you a small portion of your productivity and is not what is happening with Bitcoin mining PoW system... so anyone that says that Bitcoin is Capitalist system, is simply wrong.\n\nFurther more, as I said, only the each individual mining farm / pool can be either of 3, it can be Capitalist, it can be State Capitalist and it can be Communist type business, depending who runs and who owns each individual mining farm / pool... but the overall mining PoW system is not a Capitalist one, it is Communist one.\n\nThat's it, like or hate my rant, I don't really care any more... I am sick and tired of trying to make sense and logic into people, most people just don't get it... and maybe never will.", "101" ], [ "Like I said, you people are CLUELESS.\nYou just need to look around you, who owns what, how much wealth they have.. and how they got it. Not one of these top richest people work in any shape or form. It is you that is dumb for not being able to see the reality, and if you think that there is no single thing that I said that is correct, you are even more so clueless... and quite frankly, I don't expect any better from someone that was \"educated\" in capitalist society.\n\nYou are the type of people that thinks that American is exceptional, god given country, while going around the world and killing millions of people in the name of freedom and liberty. Fucking hypocrites.", "580" ], [ "Garbage, you don't know first thing about communism, nor do you realise that things were thought of, created and improved way before Capitalist system was even thought of, so your point is not valid. Also, Ambition is just a fancy term for greed, same social engineering and brainwashing, when they call dead people as casualties... fancy terminology for shitty reality.", "870" ], [ "No its not alright, because first of all, it is only at the early stage of opening a business that this danger of business collapse applies, the longer business exists and the bigger it gets, the less risk there is for the capitalists. The longer capitalist businesses exist and larger they grow, you end up exactly with that we have now... monopolies.\n\nPeople who could not put two and two together call this Crony Capitalism but it is in fact just Capitalism which existed long enough to get to that stage.\n\nAnd no, it is not alright that people who have not contributed to all the work that business provides, get much less more from my productivity of those that did the actual work... and bigger the business, the worse this ratio gets.\n\nYou are forgetting one thing also... capitalist could not exist without having other people work for them. The capitalist needs workers and workers understand and realise that they are being ripped off, which is happening more over the world, they will unite and first strike, and if that doesn't work, shit starts hitting the fan, as nature dictates that there is only so much pressure you can apply to anyone, before they snap, and this has happened many times before and will keep happening again and again until the system that allows this, is replaced with better system, one that benefits everyone, or at least the vast majority.\n\nAnd no, if you have savings you are by no means a capitalist. What kind of logic is that anyway? Exactly how does you having savings make you a capitalist? What, you think that just having some capital makes you a capitalist? if you think that works like that, wow... I don't know what to say to you other than you could not be more wrong.", "101" ], [ "True, miners don't create economic value, as money is not economic value, its just unit of trade/exchange, but mining can be seen as production of those units (which is what it is right now, until all units are created) so that production of bitcoins is still using some system, and as economic system defines means of production, the mining of bitcoins falls into the same category... and then you compare how the mining system works with how capitalism and communism and other economic systems work, and you (should) get to see (if you understand them all) that mining and specifically this PoW system, is what is closest to communist economic system.", "1008" ], [ "How well do you know history? if you know history well, you should know that communist were always the target of capitalist nations and monarchies, and are such to this day.\n\nAnd can I ask how is it possible that nations like USSR and say Yugoslavia, both of which were not using Capitalist type system, both managed to develop into good nations?\n\nRussia was the poorest nation at the time when it was still a monarchy, the Russian people rebelled and killed their monarchs and how rise of Communism (its real definition is workers controlling means of production, and not that crappy capitalist twisted definition which people in the west believe is the right one) then made them target of the west in both world wars... then the cold war and to this day Russia is being accused of things like meddling and spying in US elections, while the US is most known for openly doing this very thing for decades.... the west is a bloody joke to be honest, the western media is full of hypocrisy, I can writ about them for hours.\n\nNow USSR fell apart then pro-western president was in power, the nation fell apart because if western (US) meddling... same thing happened in Yugoslavia, a small but very strong Socialist nation which produced its own cars, tanks, ships, even aircraft... it was well respected in all of the world... and what happened to it? Again, the west funded small group of people (nationalists) to stir up pretend civil uprising, to attack the Yugoslav military in Slovenia... and then when the military fired back, same like in Syria and Egypt and Iraq and man others, then the west started calling the Yugoslav army as evil and how they are killing its own people, while completely and deliberately ignoring (not telling) how they funded and armed the so called rebels to attack first.\n\nI know this for a fact also as I saw the documents that US issues, some while back which showed they planed this attack some 8 months before the first fighting started in Slovenia.\n\nThe US is doing this exact same thing in Venezuela, and they did it in many other nations... so when you ask that question WHY... this is why.. because the fucking US and GB, the leaders of the Capitalist world (and remember that GB is the worst Imperialist during colonial days and they have strong ties to the US which has taken this imperialist role since its inception in 1780's.\n\nSo... as I said... how well do you know history? If you knew it well, you would know all this, and you could see the **real reason** why nations that want to or have adopted even anything slightly resembling Communism or Socialism, were always attacked by the GB, US and the capitalist west.\n\nThat is why.", "167" ], [ "In communism people are only not free to exploit others. Who says that you can't open your own business and work in it yourself? Of course you can and it was done like that. Do you think the state (which is meant to be public property, collective property) would man and run every small business? No, that is not the case, the state ran businesses were only businesses that employed over certain number of people, I don't actually know what that number is, and it would vary from nation to nation.\n\nI never said that communism has never been tried, I have said that it was never been fully implemented anywhere and that is correct. Yugoslavia was the closest I know but it was not true communism as it still had inheritance.\n\nAnd please, don't write that \"communism killed 100 million people\"... that is just like how west says that in WWII the Nazis killed 6 million Jews, which later they realised was not possible, so they had to revise that number to 3 million and even with those official numbers now, many people have tries to \"test\" if its even possible to kill so many people the way they claim, they visited the camps, which I am believing now were forced labor camps (which was also making business and profits for some western capitalists also in case you didn't know) people visited the so called gas chambers, tested for residue of the gas on the walls, which there should be plenty of, but the found none, and few other things, like the mass graves... that they could simply not be able to bury the amount of people that they claim were buried there, that they would simply not fit.\n\nThis and many other official narratives, 911 is another perfect example, shows that many (if not all) of them are just propaganda, many proven to be wrong.\n\nTake the so called attack of the Vietnamese that the US used as excuse to attack Vietnam, it never happened, the US government lied, they lied about <PERSON>, they lied about 911, they lied about Holocaust, they lie about terrorism today... its all very nice bunch of lies, all of which was created and narrated by the US and GB.. and then repeated like good puppets they are, in other NATO nations.", "778" ], [ "Sorry but that is a stupid comment.\n\nI care about what Bitcoin system can do for the society, and among other things, after thinking about how the Bitcoin system works, etc it came to me realisation that its PoW works as communist type system, which is why I brought it up, as everyone thinks that its capitalist system.\n\nAnd exactly why am I living off of someone else's efforts? I earn my own living... I am not getting any money from anyone's else's work.", "986" ], [ "So you agree that using \"Cash\" for unit denomination is a bad idea, and at the same time you think Bitcoin Cash now wants to steal the Cash name also?\n\nThat is bit of a contradiction.\n\nI think that someone that is against BCH came up with this term, for the same reason someone came up with Bcash term, in order to make mockery of Bitcoin Cash... because term Cash is a bad idea. If it was a good idea then you could argue that Bitcoin Cash might want to steal the Cash name also, but since its not a good idea... you make no sense.", "986" ], [ "If I had a $1 every time I read/heard that 100 million people dead because of communism.\n\nIts western (capitalist) propaganda... and to prove it you, please give more **details** as to how? when? and why?\n\nSame people told you 911 was done by some jihadis with box cutters... and I guess you believe that also?\n\nSame people told you Vietnamese attacked Americans in gold of Tonkin, and that is also proven lie\n\nSame people told you Iraq had WMDs, that was also a big fat lie.\n\nSo how many more lies will you believe from the US before you start questioning them?", "55" ], [ "Then please enlighten me... instead of making some claims in which you don't provide any arguments, make some actual arguments so prove me wrong. I provided plenty of them and I know what I am talking about... unlike you... I am actually talking about it.\n\nAnd FYI, American people are the ones that are most brainwashed, or what you would call, indoctrinated.\n\nI can give you many examples of propaganda and bullshit that your nation (and not just yours, GB is another one like the US) told you, that are utter bullshit, complete lies and nothing but propaganda... and this notion of what Capitalism is and how it works is another one of those fancy sounding propagandas.", "101" ], [ "payment network cannot be decentralised if your transactions depend on 3rd parties to act as money transmitters for you. So only if you have direct channel with receiver, or you know that node you are using as intermediary, is trusted and will not be censoring your transaction (which you cannot have with big centralised hubs as they have to be regulated by existing KYC laws, as they act as money transmitters.\n\nThis hasn't kicked in yet in LN because amount of funds is still tiny, but you can bet that when and if LN picks up more and more users, if they ever manage to trick people into using it (and they actually get it to work) this will eventually happen.", "831" ], [ "Well that is FOR NOW, problem with LN which people that think its great, keep missing is that this can't work like this on mass scale, at some point network will need to have map of the nodes and who's got what channels connected to whom, how much funds is in it on each end, etc. LN can't work on mass scale the way it is now, so this will happen sooner or later, nodes will know who is sending funds and so on.", "831" ], [ "> People consistently claim that Bitcoin (Cash) is 'expensive'. This is non-sensical but extremely important. If they feel it is expensive they are unlikely to buy it and then get involved.\n\n > If people buy $20 worth of BIT they will receive 16,000BIT i.e. 16,000 bits, i.e. 16,000b. This feels like they got a lot of something. Compare this to 0.016BCH, which feels like they got hardly anything.\n\nThis is actually not such a bad idea, I was thinking something in these lines also, people who don't understand that whole BCH is actually **a lot of money** is the future, won't buy it as they think they are getting **just 1** BCH, so using smallest denomination for buying BCH would make sense.\n\nAm not so fond of changing the ticker though, maybe that will just confuse people even more but its not a show stopper I guess.", "1008" ], [ "You missed the point I made already which is that, while Capitalism has decoupled the master/servant relation based on genetics and birthplace, etc, Capitalism still has master/servant relation within the most important aspect of society, which is production.\n\nI made a point that while you are indeed \"free\" to leave one master in one capitalist business, you have a choice to either pick another in another business, become a master yourself and do to others what they were doing to you, or leave society and go live off grid, which is not very pleasant.\n\nSo the so called \"freedom\" created by Capitalism is neither true freedom as it still divides people into economic classes, and because of its long term effects, it is not sustainable, unless it is countered by opposing force (as any force in nature is) to create a sustainable balance.", "101" ], [ "You just can't see the obvious can you? Its a contract, indeed, and in it says that all your work belongs to the owner and you are getting a fixed wage, and maybe some bonus if you are lucky to work for someone that gives out bonuses to its workers (and there are some capitalists that do that) but they only do it if they get sufficient/expected profits for themselves first, which still means that in order for the worker to get rewarded more than a fixed wage, he has to produce even more for the master/capitalist making the master/capitalist way more richer first.", "231" ], [ "That is pure garbage, where do you get that shit? I have studied Marxism and Communism, I was not old and wise enough back then to truly understand what its all about, but after I have grown up more, and actually lived in other part of the world, I have first hand experience and have seen both.\n\nYou are the one that doesn't even know that shit you are told in school and media, etc is just propaganda. You are told that communists want to rule the world, you are told that bankers are communists, all of which is pure propaganda by the very people that funded Nazis in WWII, the very people that control everything in your nation.\n\nLiteral definition of Capitalism is business which is Privately owned and for profit. The FED in the US and every other central bank in all Capitalist nations, are Privately owned and for profit businesses.\n\nCommunism is defines as business in which the workers own and control means of production (the business they work in).\n\nSo for you to say that bankers are communist, is just plain wrong.", "534" ], [ "No, what people call Crony Capitalism is just greedy/rotten people who are Capitalists, abusing their wealth and corrupt the state.\n\nCapitalism is specific business structure... and weather or not the capitalist business owner is good or bad (crony) person, the business structure does not change.\n\nCapitalism is a system, and this system is system that defines means of production, and this system is the same no matter what politics the state takes, if they are corrupt or not, the business structure is still the same.\n\nCan't you tell the difference?", "101" ], [ "And the part you get wrong is that you focus on start of running/opening a business, which I talked about in the video, which is not the same or as difficult once the business starts to grow (if the capitalist re-invests all the profits that workers generated from their work) which will eventually lead to the owner, the capitalist not doing ANY work at all, yet get exponentially richer.\n\nIf that is not exploitation, I don't know what is.\n\nThis is provable by simple maths... if you pay 1 worker $50 and worker generated $100 worth of work, which you sell to customer of your business, and you take the $50 profit from that worker and hire 2nd worker... you have 1st worker paying for the other worker also, and you have even more profits to reinvest... do this more and more, hire more workers and before you know it, all of the work is done by others, you do none but you have so much profits and the workers are stuck with wage they have more and more difficulty living with.\n\nYou don't understand at all what is really happening, and you don't understand it because the capitalist system that you grew up in, doesn't even mention this. If you lived in nations that didn't have or don't have Capitalist businesses, you would actually learn these things in school, but also... you'd also eventually find yourself being attacked by the US an NATO, the way all other nations that didn't or don't have capitalism, were attacked... and the US and its allies, would be calling your government as dictators, a regime and all other kinds of shit, just look around what US has been doing after WWI, the US bankers even funded Nazis, they fund ISIS today, they funded so called rebels in Yugoslavia, in Venezuela, they lied about Vietnam war and all others... just look up Trading with the enemy act... hopefully you'd snap out of the propaganda and start looking into this history and see real effects of some powerful nation having just privately owned businesses, and what shitty things they ended up doing, and they are still doing it.", "101" ], [ "its complete opposite. While I am sure many Core supporters do indeed think that miners are centralised and they are a greed driven capitalists, the reality is that this is not the case.\n\nSystem you are referring to is economic system which is a system that defines means of production and has nothing to do with trade / exchange.\n\nCapitalism is system which defines means of production as for profit privately owned business\n\nCommunism is a system which defines means of production as workers owning and controlling business.\n\nCentral banks are either privately or state owned. When central banks is privately owned it is in fact a Capitalist business and when its state owned its nether communism nor socialist, its just central bank run by the state, and as state in meant to be servant of its people, its citizens, it should not be for profit business and even if it is, the profits would be taken by the state and then given back to society and its people in form of public services (education, health etc).\n\nState bankers can indeed be corrupt and steal money, but that does not make State Onwed central bank naturally corrupt, while privately owned central bank is. This is because state run central bank is run by the state making state having no hidden master, while privately owned central bank becomes the hidden hand controlling the state, because a private central bank controls supply of money and the private bankers profit from it massively.\n\nSocialism is by the way, NOT an economic system, its a POLITICAL one... there is a difference.\n\nThink about this, AXA, Bilderberg group and other capitalist businesses that fund Blockstream, how exactly can these capitalist businesses be socialist especially when we know that they sabotaged Bitcoin system in BTC? Where is the logic in that thinking?\n\nAnother thing I hear/read over and over is that Bitcoin is free market... sure.. it allows free market because state cannot prevent anyone from sending or receiving funds using the Bitcoin system... however... the PRODUCTION of bitcoins, which acts like an economic system (read again what I wrote what economic system actually is, it is PRODUCTION of goods and services) and because the people that do this work and mine, get rewarded 100% proportional for the work they did. PoW in Bitcoin is communist type economic system and not a capitalist one... if it was capitalist then miners would be getting less from their work (mining) and someone else would be getting portion of their work (which is what DASH has for example).", "534" ], [ "And let me add, its the STATE that makes or breaks FREE MARKETS as they use laws and enforce those laws in what you can or can't do, send or receive money to and from someone, or some places etc... it is not an economic system that creates free markets.\n\nFree market exists no matter type of economic system you have as long as there is no force by the state or some other entity dictating what you can buy or sell, and whom with.\n\nAnd guess what... the US state which always brags on how they are for free trade and shit... are the very people that create and force economic sanctions onto others, which is opposite to free trade philosophy they say they stand for. This is exactly the same hypocrisy when US state talks about how they are for peace, yet they create wars all the time and attack others all the time... looking for same excuses to call someone a dictator... and you know why they do all this? They do it because the Capitalists that control the US state profit from this.", "976" ], [ "I am not talking about market prices, I am very specific in what I say, I am talking about how business is organised/structured.\n\nIf you can't even see what I am talking about, how can you ever understand what I am saying?\n\nYou have no idea what communism is, or what capitalism is. Even after I fully explain what Communism is, you STILL see the brainwashed propaganda that Capitalists put into your head, and it shows when you say shit like, how you would kill yourself then live in Communism.\n\nEverything <PERSON> said, actually came true, and everything capitalists promised, didn't.\n\nIf you only opened your mind, and drop that pre-set narrative by the capitalist society, you would see it... but then again, if you are part of the capitalist \"club\", then it makes perfect sense to be saying you love it, because you are the one profiting from it... while others don't... and sooner or later... the others will come for you (the capitalists). You think I'm just full of it? Look bit into history... it happened already, and US is next in line for that.", "101" ], [ "erm... you do know that EVERYONE must setup their own node in LN otherwise they can't use it?\n\nAlso, what is the use of such node when I can't make P2P transactions the way I can in Bitcoin (CASH) system, without even needing to setup a node, unless I always have to waste time and money in order to setup direct channel with person I am sending money to, and then again close it... just opening and closing channels will be very expensive and will automatically prevent vast majority of people in the work from being able to even use it (while in Bitcoin CASH system ANYONE can use it)... or... having to rely on trust and 3rd parties, which will be large hubs, hubs with lots of money in them tied up which only most richest people can afford... which will be bankers themselves... I mean... the naivety some of you have about this is just mind blowing.", "71" ], [ "Way better then BTC. I can so foresee a moment in time when BTC price starts to go down, and someone starts selling BTC into BCH and BCH gets up in price, the miners with most hashing power, those that mine BCH also, start dropping BTC and that chain just dies off... can you imagine the panic withing Core/BTC shills?\n\nAlright... better wake up now and stop dreaming about this... but one day... this better happen...", "1008" ], [ "I beg to differ... I've lives, studied and worked in different societies, so not only do I have first hand experience about them, but I also follow facts and logic and they guide me to these conclusions. You and anyone else can stick to what you think you know, if I did that I would still think <PERSON> did 911, I would still think US defeated Germans, I would still not even know about fractional reserve lending, how fiat actually works, or know about Bitcoin, and then again with Bitcoin Cash. I caught up with lot of things in my lifetime, living in different societies and experiencing two very different educational systems, opens your eyes quite a bit.", "1019" ], [ "Are you saying I got some money from someone else's work? How did I do that? I went to school, then UNI, I had/have a job, I earn my salary (in fact I produce more then what I get paid for) I even paid off my UNI fees... how did I not earn what I have?\n\nAnd what work did capitalist that owns the business i work in, do last year? Few weeks ago when we got an email saying what business financial results were, I was amassed to realise that average worker actually produced 5x the amount that they/we get in our wages... where does that profit go? The workers like me that did all the work... or the guy that has shit load of money that travels around and is on holiday all year long, doesn't have to work, come to office and drive 2-3h every day just to be able to pay off the mortgage and bills... the share holders... what did they do?\n\nso no... you could not be more wrong.\n\nPS:\nIts funny how you people make claims how communists are lazy and shit, even though actual meaning of communist is to earn your living from your own work and not someone else's and people who do no work, people who just own the owners, do get rewarded, and not just rewarded but rewarded way more then all the workers themselves... and you call them hard working?\n\nYou have your logic all twisted up. People that own Facebook, Google, producers of oil, diamonds, glasses, cars... all of these people who have shit load of people, working like ants, working FOR THEM while they do what exactly? They even have CEOs and directors and managers, to MANAGE everything for them, all they do is show up, look at the numbers, how much they earn, listen to some ideas how to squeeze more out of the people and production, replace them with robots, and not giving a fuck what those people and their families will do when they are out of job... and then when all companies do the same as all companies do the same in general, who is going to be left to have money to buy anything from these capitalists?\n\nYou don't understand the most basic principles of life, nature and physics... nothing can last and be sustainable if it creates a force pulling in one direction, you always must have something to counter that force... if capitalists get what they want, they ultimately destroy the society.\n\nBut what the fuck would I know... what would I know about Bitcoin system and what system it uses... even if I am the first person to stand up and say that Bitcoin Cash is the real Bitcoin. I must be just a fake and a moron.", "101" ], [ "Which people are you talking about when you call them Communists? I am aware that states of nations that call themselves Communist, are corrupt also, Russian revolution was hijacked by the same people that hijacked Bitcoin.\n\nI however know what real Communism is, and it is not the state being in control of business but the workers that work in them, and if you go and look in those nations that claim to be communist, or someone else claims for them to be communist, you will see that workers were/are not in control of decisions but the state... and that is NOT Communism, that is State Capitalism. And reason this happened is because bankers and others who are protecting their monopolies, find it easier to just bribe some statist and help him get in power... which is what happened with <PERSON> and likely others also.\n\nI am not in favor of that type of economic system, I am in favor of WORKERS being in control, not the private individuals or the state, as they are a minority who always ends up exploiting work created by the workers... and that is the root of all problems in society, as these minorities always end up fucking up everyone else, as all it takes is one corrupt fucker doing something dodgy, like bribing the politicians, and he ends up fucking up everyone else like that... this is what we need to get rid off and until we do, this will keep happening.", "534" ], [ "Why? I know you are trying to bash Bitcoin Cash, as that Bcash label is dead giveaway ;-) but all answer it properly anyway... because all other crypto are just short term ways for someone to get rich quick. If it has no real and good use case, it won't survive long term... Bitcoin Cash has best use case there is, it works well and this is why it will not just go away like many others.", "1008" ], [ "So many of you are still clueless, the shit we have on society is not because of socialism or communism, but because of monarchs, slavery, feudalism and capitalism... they are the 1% who control and make everything happen... they are ones that did colonialism, slavery and mass murder, they are the ones that even funded Nazis in WWII and did business with them, they are the ones that attacked communists in WWI and WWII, then again cold war, and every other war thereafter, dividing 3 nations after WWII and creating that fascist Israel state, created after they fabricated lot of things about Holocaust.\n\nYou want to know who really controls everything and who Bitcoin system is fighting against? Look at this video.. its the BANKERS, the Capitalists... Blockstream and Core and that <PERSON> prick is funded by these same people, not by socialists or communists.\n\nWhen will you people wake the fuck up?\n\n_URL_1_\n\n_URL_0_", "778" ], [ "Bankink system we have is one form of capitalism.\n\nBankers are capitalists, they use their capital, and worse, capital that they don't have, give to others in order to get true wealth created from work.. plus interest.\n\nCapitalist business owner uses capital (which he can borrow also) hires others to produce and their productivity pais for everything, all costs of materials and their wages... and profits for the capitalists.\n\nBoth these are same type (PoS) systems, and while Bitcoin system is fighting to replace the monetary one, the economic one (system of production) needs to use same PoW principle, in that only those that do the work, should be rewarded proportionally to their productivity.\n\nPS: Socialism is state using tax money to provide services for its PEOPLE, not the business or banks. Bankers are not socialist, they are capitalist... and there is nothing socialist about corrupt state (which is controlled by the bankers) to use taxpayer money to bail the banks out, or some capitalist business.", "101" ], [ "Oh, its Nernzzzz again, thinking too much about Bitcoin Cash.\n\nI don't know what you are getting at, maybe you should see dominance of BTC instead and how its been going down since the blocks started getting full.\n\nBTC doesn't work properly any more... and those people funded by bankers celebrate this... and you still don't get a clue? Ah well... maybe one day it'll dawn on you, till then, you'll stay clueless.", "1008" ], [ "And again, not correct.\n\nThese central banks are PRIVATELY OWNED BANKS, they are very much CAPITALIST BUSINESSES. They are businesses that want to make money, and the monetary system using fractional reserve lending is invented by them, which is systematic theft of wealth through lending out money that doesn't exist.\n\nCapitalism is also such system as all Capitalist does is invest money to start a business which he owns, hires workers that do all the work and produce everything... which in turn pays for everything, the materials, the initial cost, their wages and profits for the capitalist owner.\n\nCapitalism is very much the root of the problem as it is exploitative system which systematically extracts wealth created by workers.\n\nAll capitalist business does this, and banks are doing it also.", "101" ], [ "<PERSON>, drop those authors... no need for them. What you need is to focus on how the system works, not on what someone said will happen because of it, which in fact if I may add, <PERSON> was correct when he made prediction that capitalism will create massive wealth inequality and social issues because of it, which we experienced many times before, the great depression in 1930's was one such massive event, which was sorted out, temporarily by Keynesian economics because the state pushed the rich capitalists to agree to be taxed more to pay for all the social needs, and things improved massively, America also benefited greatly from both WWI and WWII as it industry made huge profits from war production... then end of war, created enemy out of those that freed Europe from Nazis and their allies (1/2 of Europe was ally with Germans), and only communists fought them... then Capitalist US and GB called them an enemy, evil and what not else that wants to take over the world... so while US and GB bankers funded Nazis to go fight the rise of communism, communists actually defeated Nazis, and then cold war started...\n\nHow well do you know this history, huh?\n\nI can see you don't understand the working principles of capitalism, communism and socialism.\n\nyes it is long topic, but its can be explained in 1-2 paragraph.", "101" ], [ "Well, its very limited use one... so, its just shitty crypto currency.\n\nDon't worry about it, just spread the knowledge about what is happening and people will eventually catch on.\n\nNo one will want to use the LN, and when they see Bitcoin Cash used more and more, actually using it to buy things, they will come around... especially when they see you increased your wealth by having it long term.", "1008" ], [ "BTC devs, those sellouts that are funded by bankers are the ones that attacked usability of Bitcoin by preventing on chain scaling. Their propaganda goes on to this day... anf they are the ones attacking Bitcoin Cash.\n\nBitcoin Cash is the only true implementation of Bitcoin system. BTC no longer is, SegWit is not it and Lightning is centralized banking system hiding behind Bitcoin name as these crooks are calling it as scaling of Bitcoin, which is nothing but propaganda.", "986" ], [ "They (bankers) can't afford Bitcoin system to be used as money, why they fund Blockstream to get its code hijacked so that capacity increase doesn't happen. People who still think that Core guys are just ignorant etc that can't see this, are very naive, they are doing this with reason, people that fund them want this.\n\nCore are like government, they are just a front for the secret hidden hand that pays them... same as with politicians... they are just puppets.\n\nThey want to brainwash people that they can get rich by buying BTC and never using it, so to wait till banker's new banking system (Lighting( is ready for use... and then they will tell people,create LN channel (same as opening bank account) and stay in it, and they will have to, as BTC will simply be unusable to get out... the fees will be too high, remember?\n\nSo no, this is their intention.... it could not be more obvious to me... but I can see people are still not picking this up.", "986" ], [ "Don't talk about that crap... I can give you many examples of American killing their own people, and tens of millions of others. 911, Northwoods are 2 such examples, but there are many others.\n\nCommunism is Economic System, it is a system of production, which says that workers are owning the means of production. That is what is actual Communism.\n\nTake Bitcoin for example... what is it? Is it what original white paper described it as or what Blockstream & Core are describing it as?\n\nBitcoin is P2P Cash system... but new narrative, narrative by the people that fund Blockstream, same people that funded Nazis in WWII (the US bankers) is that Bitcoin is store of value.\n\nDo you see what I mean?\n\nThe new definition of both Communism and Bitcoin are propaganda. I know both original definitions, which is why I like both Bitcoin and Communism... but I guess you need to stop being ignorant about what you think Communism is, as you were born into propaganda definition only, same as new people in Bitcoin hear the new definition of Bitcoin only.\n\nI rest my case... you can be ignorant as much as you want, fact stay the same.", "534" ], [ "Communism not only works but it did work. It is the Capitalist that attack communism and socialism all the time. How many nations did US attack? Are any of them capitalist nations? No they are not... all of them are either Socialist or Communist, or going that side more or less. If you paused a bit and thought about it, learned bit more about real history, you would see that I am 100% right. These things already happened... it is always the Capitalist/Monarch west attacking communism... not other way around.\n\nCommunism is like Bitcoin Cash... it is fighting back the attack of the Capitalists, the bankers.", "778" ], [ "I am not obsessed with it, I am trying to make people snap out of the brainwashing.\n\nThere is in fact real Communism and real Capitalism. You are living in real Capitalism, and those capitalists brainwashed you and almost all of the world under their control (which is a good chunk of the globe) that Communists are evil, killing their own people, wanting to take over the world, which is exactly what those capitalists have been doing all along.\n\nThere is nothing wrong with collectivism, in fact it is needed, because people alone can't achieve much, can't build massive things and know a lot, which is why people seek help, assistance, cooperation, which is all collectivism, a family is collective, a small town is collective, a business is collective... but difference in what you perceive as collectivism is things like National Socialism (Nazism) which is bad type of collectivism, one that uses collective for the benefit of the state, and those that control the state.\n\nIn America you have this today, its what you are calling Patriotism, going into wars to \"defend America\" and \" defend freedom\"... shit like that, but you don't see that as collectivism, don't you?\n\nCapitalism is another bad type of collectivism... workers produce as a collective, but the capitalist extracts the benefits.\n\nCommunism is type of collective where workers are doing exact same thing as in communism, but this time worker are the ones that get the benefits, and not some capitalist, monarch, etc.", "101" ], [ "But you forget that force of the system lies in us (the masses of people) giving them that power in the first place. If people don't cimply with their orders, that system no longer works.... it only works because we allow it.\n\nIf everyone stopped using fiat and banks and switched to Bitcoin system in BCH, their fiat and central banks, and lot of shit that they control, goes to shits.\n\nTrue power is always with the people... they know this, which is why they have to brainwash people... but once people figure this out, its game over.", "986" ], [ "BTC's use case is destroyed already, the smart contracts ability was destroyed when Core took the op-codes out, the usability as money is destroyed when Core refused to increase block capacity, they even say they want to reduce it.\n\nSo what is left for BTC? Promise from the same people who fucked up the use cases for Bitcoin, that completely different system, one that is not even a blockchain, is going to replace it... and yet you still want to argue that Core & Blockstream are correct in what they say, and we are not?\n\nNo... they and you are not correct, we even give plenty of actual and factual arguments for our reasoning, while you base your opinion on faith that what Core are saying is true, even though they are proven wrong on many occasions.... yeah I see how your brain works.", "986" ], [ "Most people are brainwashed.\n\nAnd there is no smear campaign when I and others call BCH the real Bitcoin... this is factual, you only need to step outside of your brainwashing bubble to see this.\n\n- Bitcoin is a SYSTEM\n- This Bitcoin system works in 2 blockchains (and there are other blockchains that have done changes to it so they work differently)\n- Out of the 2 blockchains that are the only ones having original block, only 1 works properly and other one doesn't, and this is not a coincidence or mistake... it is deliberately done so.\n- So pure logic and no bias, concludes that only the properly working blockchain that uses this Bitcoin system should be called the real Bitcoin, which is what we are saying... BCH is that blockchain... BTC no longer is.\n\nIts tough luck for you if you are too stupid to understand this very basic logic.", "986" ], [ "I criticise the assholes that are spreading lies and propaganda... what the fuck is wrong with you people? According to you, Core & Blockstream should be left alone and not say anything bad about them when they are literally the people that attacked usabiility of Bitcoin system in BTC first, they deliberately sabotaged it, they spread lies and propaganda, and you expect me and anyone else that understands what they are doing, to just chill and be pleasant?\n\nGo fuck yourself.", "986" ], [ "You are calling <PERSON>, which should mean you are religious, and should imply that you should have strong morals, and teach those morals to your kids... and you think I am bad that after teaching my kid(s) morals and they end up doing something immoral like that (or worse)? Ah well... just shows what I knew already that religion is just form of brainwashing also, <PERSON> won't save you that much is a fact... just what the fuck is wrong with all you people? Oh I know... society brainwashed you quite well... you think you are not brainwashed because you learned about crypto and Bitcoin? mate.. brainwashing works in many more layers, you have not even scratched the surface. But whatever, apparently porn is very moral now and I must be lunatic? If its so moral, I hope all your daughters end up doing it... see how you like it them... you fucking idiots.", "165" ], [ "Oh but you are so wrong... we have 100% consensus with using Bitcoin system, and scaling on it, but I don't expect brainwashed people to understand logic, if you had working logic I wouldn't need to tell you this and you would be on Bitcoin Cash blockchain and not hodl-ing your BTC crap that has no more use case, other than trying to sell to another schmuck later on at higher price... if you are lucky to sell it before it goes down.", "986" ], [ "Some people have working logic, others don't. Sad thing is, most of us are not very smart at all, its sad but true reality.\n\nAnd its pointless to try to talk logic to people who don't have it... so let them learn the hard way, which they will eventually. I just wonder who they will blame later on? Will they blame Blockstream (for lying to them), will they blame themselves (for being stupid and falling for Blockstream's lies) or will they blame us (for being right).", "30" ], [ "Nope. BCH is Bitcoin. You are free to log out and not visit if you don't like it.... it is your choice, you can be here or not, participate in discussion or not, unlike in r/bitcoin where you are allowed to participate only if you agree with Blockstream, and you are banned when you don't.\n\nAnd FYI, that is the reason why r/btc exists, because of censorship at r/bitcoin which is controlled by Blockstream and their associates (who are controlled by bankers as the bankers are funding them and their propaganda campaigh), and also this is the exact same reason by BCH exists, because Blockstream have prevented usability of BTC.", "986" ], [ "Nope, SegWit did not have anywhere near consensus until it was coupled with increase to 2Mb blocks also, and then the 2nd part of the agreement was ditched by your lying cult leaders, or I guess you have selective memory? Of course you do, all of you vocal BTC shills and morons calling Bitcoin Cash as Bcash are like that, selective memory, double standards, no logic and nothing but bullshit.\n\nSegWit is an Altcoin you dummy, go read the definition of Bitcoin from the original source, Bitcoin is, among other things, a **chain of digital signatures** which SegWit is not, and stop being a greedy idiot and an ass.", "47" ], [ "Nope, you are lying through your teeth.\n\nSegWit on its own DID NOT have consensus. Not even close.\n\nAlso SegWit has no block size increase. The blocks are exact same size as they were before. What SegWit has done is removed the signatures out of the blocks and doing so broke one of the main Bitcoin rules, which is why SegWit is an Altcoin.\n\nIn fact, SegWit shit has increased the HSS space per transaction more than 4x because now, instead of having 1MB block handle the transactions with signatures in it, it has 1MB Bitcoin block + 3MB non-Bitcoin blocks which stores signatures and other shit code in it from SegWit to achieve measly few % more Tx in Bitcoin block.\n\nAnd don't talk about ASIC boost, that shit is getting old.\n\nGet a brain you fool", "47" ], [ "We have r/bch and r/bitcoincash reddit already in case you haven't noticed. Your suggestion that we need to use r/bch to talk about Bitcoin Cash is not valid as Bitcoin Cash is a working blockchain of the Bitcoin system, and the scaling discussion started long before BCH fork and most of good and truthful information about this is right here at r/btc.\n\nAs I said, go tell Blockstream to start r/Lightning to promote their Lighting network and while they are at it, they should start r/SegWit also as this is a fork (and actual Altcoin) of Bitcoin.", "986" ], [ "Which part of the chain of events and logic you don't get?\n\n- SegWit was proposed... it got very low consensus, not even 1/2 the miners supported it.\n- UASF was a forceful threat to activate it, it did not go through because\n- SegWit2X was being agreed upon by every miner, except 1, which meant consensus was reached but it had to include raising blocks to 2MB also.\n- SegWit part from SegWit2X was done, but Core/Blockstream and few miners started backing out on the 2X deal and it was eventually called off, by that time Bitcoin Cash forked already, saved the code from SegWit crap, upgraded actual Bitcoin system to *MB blocks... and so on.\n\nMaybe you should get re-educated if you can't follow this logic and stop wasting time in like thinking you got it all figured out... Bcash propaganda won't get you far... and now you can piss off and stop wasting my time. Get an IQ.", "47" ], [ "And in case you do (someone always does), you will have to toughen it out and not sell later when it dips... you will have to live through the dip. You could then also get more when its low, as that way you don't have to wait till it goes back up when you bought it just to get even, if you buy the dip later, by the time it goes back whee you bought it higher, you will be in profit already.\n\nAnd never, ever do what some people do, and invest what you can't risk to lose... and lastly, always think this is long term and not get rich quick scheme, and you will be fine.", "507" ], [ "You need to keep in mind that bankers have control of the BTC code and they have lot of means to narrate their propaganda, and they have done exact;y that.\n\nIf we stay silent and don't explain things as they are, the newcomers will get sucked in, in their propaganda.\n\nPeople need to learn that there is a difference between Bitcoin as a system, and Bitcoin BTC as a blockchian, so that they can know that when we say Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin, we mean, its the actual Bitcoin system.", "986" ], [ "Looking at how I acted when I got into BTC back in Jan 2017, I did not rely on single statement or video or article to know what I am getting myself into. I did bit of (not as much as I did after, and kept increasing my understanding of this whole thing) so I expect everyone doing the same to do bit of research first.\n\nIf they are getting into Bitcoin they will surely be watching the price first (this is what gets most people in initially) they will notice that price is not the same, but also if they get in just because of this \"Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin\" statement, surely they will know there are 2 different terms in there, Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin... they will/should notice it. I don't buy this idea that someone will accidentally buy BCH thinking it was BTC, there were few times some posts with fake users saying they did this, but it was shown to be fake BTC shills doing their same ol' dirty work with propaganda against Bitcoin Cash.", "986" ] ]
36
[ 7507, 18686, 15215, 10169, 10326, 23410, 16399, 8921, 5218, 10758, 21101, 24950, 20936, 18153, 8879, 15522, 3438, 9308, 23023, 11492, 12319, 19817, 6351, 10166, 20592, 19023, 24219, 17866, 14208, 10088, 21592, 18491, 5194, 22948, 14354, 22185, 457, 1858, 15774, 9235, 5619, 3202, 23809, 9166, 269, 10051, 2392, 4467, 4944, 21096, 21188, 9529, 3674, 9809, 3354, 9040, 5446, 22377, 1365, 5035, 8312, 13410, 24933, 25464, 8251, 91, 6905, 24889, 8672, 7287, 22060, 17052, 5508, 4383, 13728, 2397, 4051, 11901, 12919, 5425, 6844, 24267, 5230, 23777, 5840, 12163, 23144, 6416, 4902, 17567, 4948, 6183, 12414, 17661, 11876, 2206, 4263, 9062, 15601, 18349, 24474, 9558, 13933, 11998, 19306, 4057, 6770, 14898, 5429, 18298, 872, 3909, 15283, 923, 4303, 14393, 13399, 19418, 493, 4342, 8758, 14349, 18531, 727, 15997, 14666, 13057, 6548, 9966, 5164, 1401, 6639, 3026, 614, 21417, 15714, 18112, 19189, 11276, 12451, 88, 3831, 1130, 9134, 9028, 23417, 10564, 20753, 8973, 5279, 1814, 23568, 22244, 769, 5841, 14671, 25164, 2828, 7950, 2200, 6909, 22335, 12259, 24805, 15097, 17062, 10028, 7787, 18087, 24046, 1488, 17700, 7978, 10425, 3270, 11964, 14374, 7649, 22385, 4169, 10873, 18409, 15121, 2964, 14934, 4552, 5427, 17178, 21367, 4442, 15767, 2940, 25068, 19549, 10743, 2212, 12381, 12377, 6815, 19074, 21908, 9745, 7925, 17397, 21969, 24990, 12333, 7983, 24932, 11928, 2492, 23287, 13000, 1937, 8818, 17049, 9887, 21612, 4215, 9923, 8065, 18197, 16600, 922, 222, 22819, 13846, 10376, 13084, 17593, 25423, 23242, 7871, 13474, 21961, 18220, 19748, 7631, 4796, 9862, 5678, 7289, 7713, 11713, 5190, 24208, 13012, 2048, 9065, 5231, 16767, 13001, 19833, 5658, 3653, 1370, 5930, 14112, 20769, 12565, 10288, 11626, 22062, 21137, 17422, 24104, 18606, 22041, 12866, 19582, 23422, 1169, 23750, 589, 15890, 6855, 12509, 18125, 5112, 1800, 4168, 24807, 12749, 9988, 9927, 637, 25036, 25359, 13935, 1518, 12140, 12402, 6009, 7222, 11454, 1766, 1704, 6927, 19668, 16006, 4035, 8455, 15872, 20707, 1780, 7273, 23634, 984, 483, 8908, 6938, 21249, 20367, 7109, 7844, 17247, 20129, 1951, 14646, 7111, 11963, 9041, 2093, 2288, 14458, 22996, 3939, 17544, 21982, 18732, 800, 15132, 14076, 20708, 24214, 9520, 4429, 20192, 4135, 25294, 10253, 12694, 17201, 21217, 3275, 22156, 23902, 20354, 5122, 22968, 21312, 12134, 4206, 15494, 16290, 11197, 14230, 19159, 4238, 7684, 1072, 14350, 16601, 21932, 10886, 608, 8266, 5037, 25494, 12113, 22325, 6107, 13996, 5390, 19802, 15505, 16385, 5811, 21931, 11159, 7277, 22580, 18647, 16050, 19784, 4949, 10389, 6713, 25133, 9210, 8541, 13782, 14660, 12825, 17656, 3608, 11444, 287, 6191, 19180, 10537, 14707, 19874, 3492, 20815, 14580, 11521, 8143, 8005, 12816, 7301, 18886, 4881, 11243, 24184, 757, 288, 5958, 18010, 5348, 11619, 17378, 13768, 4270, 6752, 9753, 2180, 10303, 25087, 25156, 16804, 8626, 20497, 11568, 19011, 21562, 11002, 24605, 18140, 16805, 15687, 14667, 5912, 21787, 20039, 20982, 31, 20022, 40, 4115, 12143, 1464, 16426, 14951, 729, 2925, 12317, 22, 14894, 7977, 13790, 1662, 3552, 18177, 7848, 4892, 4290, 12203, 13622, 6704, 11595, 6343, 10482, 14636, 15188, 14778, 22950, 13126, 16677, 8435, 15842, 16108, 5731, 24442, 6237, 8135, 17755, 4781, 19746, 25403, 18219, 9531, 3350, 16971, 21709, 21036, 3146, 7994, 7557 ]
reddit_dump_---TheFierceDeity---
[ [ "I’m saying someone who is good, can win *regardless* of the rule set. I’m not saying someone who’s ruleset is items is more skilled, in saying the most skilled players are the ones in elite who play with no preferences and just fight anyone and everyone on their own teed and still win. \n\nSomeone who wins regardless of whether there are items, no items, long timer, short timer, stamina, Final Smashes etc. \n\nI’m saying someone who wins regardless of ruleset, is more skillful that someone who can only win in one ruleset. The types of players who would beat you in your preferred ruleset and then go to beat the people using the ruleset you hate.", "508" ], [ "Did you miss the part where I said they’re doing this stuff after taking one stock despite been down two. \n\nEven when I’m not in my main these wannabe tryhards aren’t beating me lol\n\nI made this post cause it’s boring. I’m using this character I never use cause I don’t want tryhard sweaty smash like I deal with on mains in elite, I want *normal* smash, and little wannabes trying to emulate higher skilled players and failing isn’t that. It’s just an annoyance.", "439" ], [ "But that’s not what I’m saying, I’m saying someone these people win regardless. They’re not you who complains you sometimes loose to “bullshit” as you put it, they’re players who adapt to anything thrown at them any still win.\n\nYou can’t just attribute that to luck. Fact remains if you can only do well within a narrow range of rules, your average at best.", "286" ], [ "Sadly bubbling under the surface seems to be the \"best\" state any country ever achieves. On a legal and surface level everyone gets along, but go into anyone's home or private life and they'll have at least one group they spit vitriol about and blame for all their own personal life problems.\n\nThe key is making sure that's where it stays. No one gives a fuck if some sad person sits at home making horrid remarks about someone who is different from them, the issue is when they go beyond private remarks.", "647" ], [ "I wonder how you turn “a few dudes in a truck with a single machine gun waste lots of expensive ammunition cause they don’t understand that just cause these birds are big and don’t fly, they’re still birds and when they hear loud noises they scatter to the 4 winds, not bunch up like mammals” into a movie.\n\nLike I know here on the internet the emu war is a hilarious meme we Aussies exaggerate, but reality is more an amusing anecdote on the idiotic ways people tried to employ population control in the previous century", "431" ], [ "There is a difference between a curious kid and a transgender kid. We have experts who can ya know use their expertise to determine this kind of stuff. They're not doing these things to any kid who goes \"I like dresses and pretty things\"\n\nAnd of the kids actually determined to be transgender, very few \"grow out of it\". All this law does is doom entire groups of trans kids into guaranteed depression and increased suicide rates as they go through puberty and become even more like the sex they don't align with. All this law says is \"fuck you, you wanna transition your gonna do it when the end result means we can tell your trans at a glance cause we forced you to let your secondary sex characteristics develop\"\n\nThat's what this law is about, controlling trans people and making their lives harder. There is a feature of this bill that will force schools to out trans kids to their parents, which is obviously meant to have the effect of said parents trying to \"fix\" their transgender kid. Fucking bible belt states are a cancer on the planet", "292" ], [ "In these peoples minds, what happens is a kid goes \"I like dresses\" or \"I like shorts\" and their parents rush them to a doctor who lops their genitals off, and then tragically the second they turn 18 they realize it was just a phase and they were \"mutilated\" permanently. \n\nThey seem to think the ones who come out the otherside genuinely transgender are the minority, and most would 'grow out of it' if they hadn't started to transition.\n\nThis fucking mindset is how we get dudes in their 50's coming out as trans cause assholes spent to much effort telling them its just a phase for the last 50 years", "292" ], [ "There were very much men running around lamenting they weren't women, and women lamenting they weren't men. In many non-european cultures, they even had a designated \"third-sex\" for such people, and it wasn't until bible thumpers from Europe came that such a notion became taboo.\n\nThere are ancient sumerian texts for 4000+ years ago noting people who identified as the other sex. Roman emperor <PERSON> from the year 222 preferred to be called a lady (rather than a lord), one account says says <PERSON> delighted in being called <PERSON>'s (his husband) mistress, wife, and queen.", "842" ], [ "You mean how currently they just put the child on puberty blockers, which prevent them from been forced to undergo puberty as the sex they don't identify with, until they're older where they usually make the decision.\n\nYa know that procedure that has no negative long term effects and peddles to the concerns of people like you, who think your random fringe \"worst case scenario\" outcomes bear more weight that the diagnoses of professionals in these fields. \n\nBut no apparently that's not good enough, no the trans kid HAS to under go puberty and morph into the sex they don't identify with. Fuck what is wrong with you people I swear", "292" ], [ "Because they were presented with \"create an origin story for the entire Legend of Zelda mythos\" and produced something not only fitting but enjoyable. Most franchises that try to retroactively tell the origin story of their franchise mess it up, but SS did a fantastic job. So sure in a vaccum its not the greatest story in gaming, but what it does as a story makes it all that more special\n\nHell it turned the generic \"chosen ones sword\" we've wielded for years into an actual character, and so from forever more when you wield the Master Sword its not just a sword, its an old friend.", "952" ], [ "> Surprisingly I'm getting a better ping from Frankfurt than Sydney.\n\nThat's actually expected. The entire reason we wanted a Aussie server is cause 90% of companies look at a map and go \"eh they can use (insert Asian country server)\". But they don't grasp most of out population is east coast. The internet infrastructure between the East Coast of a Australia (Sydney in this case) and the West Coast (Basically Perth) is...trash. Like really bad. \n\nSo we really really begged CIG for a Aussie server cause if say they put us to Singapore the only people who would get a decent ping would be the tiny amount of people in Perth. In that case East Coast Aussies would get a better Ping from USA than Singapore. \n\nSo if the ping trying to connect from Sydney and all of Asia is shitty, you can bet the ping from Asia trying to connect to Sydney is gonna be crap as well. One day when we get a competent government they might upgrade the transcontinental infrastructure, but sadly that's not gonna happen with the current mob.", "79" ], [ "Because the community majority are sensible adults who look at all the given information, realize this is a highly ambitious project and that delays of varying lengths are to be expected. \n\nLets note Starcraft 2, a vastly more simple game took SEVEN YEARS of active development from a established AAA developer with the full team and funding right from the get go. Sure the hype the build doesn't match what they deliver but any reasonable sensible person can see they're progressing fine", "7" ], [ "So first category 100% fine on that's old style. \n\nSecond category. So these books include new units? Like when they released said books new units also came with it? Or is it JUST rules for the existing units the normal codex have.\n\nThird I think I get. So essentially these books can be used as their own \"games\"? In theory I could just get Death from the Skies and JUST play what looks like Mini-Battlefleet Gothic. Or JUST get Gathering Storm and play that as it's own spin-off tabletop game using 40k miniatures.\n\nWhat I do need further info on, is Apocalypse dead? I see the weird Lords of War thingy which lets you put Apocalypse models into normal 40k battles. Like ofc I can still play Apocalypse but is it a no-longer supported by GW game type, cause the website has the book SOLD OUT. When I stopped Apocalypse was still a thing~", "547" ], [ "See the majority of what people call promises were more so vague estimations. The only \"promise\" I saw was \"SQ42 2016\" in big letters during a trailer. Everything else has been them \"hoping to have it out by X\" and those hopes been stated by <PERSON> who is a hopeless optimist. No doubt those hopes could come true IF not a single thing went wrong during production which is nigh impossible. \n\nBut my point is between the last massive content drop and now the only promise was SQ42 2016 which has been explained kinda.", "422" ], [ "You act like that isn't a valid point? Here let me get some statistics for you. \n\nCIG Employees \n\n2012 8\n\n2013 56\n\n2014 170\n\n2015 270\n\n2016 364\n\nNow take into account not all 364 employees are directly involved in game creation but in the running of the company.\n\nNow lets compare. The SC:2 Wings of Liberty development team was way larger than CIG at it's current peak. 165 people worked on just the Cinematics. That's shy 30 people from half of all of CIG, on JUST cinematics for cutscenes AND NOT including the voice over actors. \n\nThe SC:2 Wings of Liberty team was mostly there from the start, with obviously contractors and voice actors only been temporary but that's the same with CIG. The team featured developers and programers who had worked on Starcraft before and other RTS games, so they had experience building a RTS game. They also had all their funding from the start which considering they are a AAA company their accountants and budgeting experts properly allocated to specific divisions.\n\nNow we get to subjective stuff, SC:2 ultimately wasn't that big of a difference from SC:1. Ofc there were lots of balancing changes but otherwise it played the same imho.\n\nStar Citizen is ..undeniably incredibly experimental and involving not much done before. The individual elements that make up the game have been done before (aka FPS shooter been done before etc etc), but as a package it is unprecedented by any successful, working product. Additionally, on vote of the community that backed it, the game changed from it's original goal to a entirely different beast all together. Predictably that had to cause some tripping during the development process. \n\nYes SC:2 Wings of Liberty had a lot more done by year 5, but they hit the ground running. It took CIG 3 years to hit 5 more employees than SC:2's cinematic department. \n\nYou cannot throw away the \"well they had to build a company from scratch\" + \"They're still within the timeframe of other less ambitious games\" arguments because they're incredibly valid.\n\nMost complaints come from people been spoiled with insider content and wanting more. The couple dozen armchair developers on this sub+ the forums don't help either. Bet yoou a million dollars if any of them where in CIG's shoes the product wouldn't be at Alpha 1.0 yet.", "7" ], [ "I know that XD I'm up to date on fluff just not rules and the game etc. Basically beforehand they were literally the good guys, a young optimistic race with a vision for the galaxy, and <PERSON> was the renegade bad-guy <PERSON> who gave into the Fire Castes natural bloodlust been the warrior caste. \n\nNow it's as you said with the Ethereals controlling the Tau via a religious and possibly pheromone based control, and if you don't join the Greater Good your purged. <PERSON> is now the \"good guy\"ish because while he was away from the Ethereals control he realized that they were IN control.", "212" ], [ "No they don't. YOU have a lot more expectations and they're unrealistic. CIG are been plenty open with their development, more so than many (not all) other companies by a large margin. What YOU are complaining about is they're not giving access to specific things YOU want to see. I've had this discussion a dozen times and each time the person was saying \"people\" (aka just them in context) want to see X specific thing. Different every time.", "370" ], [ "Beet I see you enough in the <PERSON> reddit to know what you say is horribly biased towards lazy trolling, but I'll indulge you the majority of \"delays\" are on vauge hopes not promises, as I'm sure you've seen stated plenty of times. You can argue semantics on that all you want but so far they've only missed two major deadlines that were promised, Star Marine and SQ42. We got Star Marine now.", "7" ], [ "Very in depth. So apocalypse is basically dead and just \"eh we'll play with 5000 points\" or something, okay.\n\nNow on the new books I'm sorry I wasn't clear I understood they would use standard 40k rules as a base but I was getting they're entirely different ways of playing. But from sounds of it, it's just adding more complicated depth to normal battles. Correct?\n\nAnd okay I understand the campaign books. So in that 20% they include new units and such that you can use in normal games, but you'll need the rules for them from those Campaign books to play them? Like the uhh, Ynnead stuff?", "734" ], [ "Your completely missing the context. Nothing wrong with the backers doing it but any disappointment resulting in them getting their hopes up on their own personal beliefs is on them and doesn't require a armed revolt against CIG. If a person looks at the infomation shown, makes a conclusion and their conclusion is wrong that's on them. When <PERSON> does it, that's on <PERSON>. People give him shit for it and so they should. They shouldn't go around proclaiming bullshit conspiracy theories and announcing the end times", "827" ], [ "Well thankyou. So realistically to update my Tau to modern, I just need the new codex and rulebook. Sadly my poor Broadsides are grossly retro looking now but the Crisis Suits barely changed. But hey I got a set of XV15 stealth suits so I've got about as retro a Tau army as you can get.", "880" ], [ "Your not gonna convince me man I ain't no chump. I haven't put a cent into the game because I work on a policy of no early-access game purchases. So I am looking from the outside in. What I see is 6 groups. Hopelessly passionate fans who are naieve, grumbly armchair devs who want it to succeed but bitch and moan about every tiny thing, lame trolls trying their gosh darn hardest to convince people the game is a hopeless pipedream for a variety of reasons, extreme pessimists who see doom in every thing and fall prey most often to the trolls, the don't really comment because they're sensible adults who have looked at this as \"I put money in if it works FANTASTIC, if it doesn't oh well\" and I believe this is the VAST majority of the backers, and me someone who looked at what was offered and decided I don't have much disposable income for what is essentially a gamble but i'll watch and see.\n\nFrom the outside in, I see a portion of the community picking over every day with a fine tooth comb and that's silly, and I see the people who for some reason are equally obsessed with the game but hope for it's downfall and or something else that's a negative outcome (THAT'S YOU BEET). \n\nThe info I have seen, gives me decent hopes this game will succeed. There are many ways it could fail, but at this stage it's progressing just fine compared to other developments I have followed.", "342" ], [ "No because that's not something they want to share, heck I don't even know what that is cause I ain't some wannabee armchair dev. This furthers my point, people can't bitch it isn't \"open\" if that don't show you what specific thing you want them to be open about. I could replace \"JIRA Backlog\" with many other things someone else has said \"if they're so open why cant we see X\"", "370" ], [ "I think i prefer that style. In said english teachers club I was never good at winning cause my style didn't fit the tau. I had the broadsides sit back and obliterate every vehicle ever, I still recall exploding a Necron Monolith first turn and the guy rage quitting. But then I had my Crisis team and commander jump around been annoying fkers...always lost to <PERSON>. \n\nAlso remember at a GW shop playing some Chaos global campaign when Codex:Daemons of Chaos first released and having my Inquisitor been the sole surviving member of my Grey Knights army, sitting in a tower objective that only could fit one dude on top, spending every round channeling this one psychic power that prevents daemons from entering a blast template radius. Cause it was Daemons they had no ranged units so he just sat there in his \"fuck you\" bubble. Couldn't hold the objective been a HQ but he prevented them from having it\n\nSo I think I'll like the preference of objective based maps over kill everything.", "22" ], [ "You would think that but I haven't purchased anything, thus I don't have confirmation bias that buying the game was the right thing to do. You on the other hand have massive confirmation bias on whether refunding/never buying was the right thing to do. ALso I agrue not because I have doubt, but because it annoys the fuck outta me when people go around spreading panicky bullshit without anyone holding them in check. I frequent the <PERSON> Archiving reddit as it stands a glorious monument to holding a bullshit spewing FUD campaigniner to account for his crap", "342" ], [ "There is no such thing as SURE THING, I'm a scientist, it would be folly to ever believe in a sure thing. The odds are in favor of SC SUCCEEDING however, not failing.\n\nTo paraphrase your favorite doctor <PERSON>, your a Low Tier concern troll.\n\nIt's sad <PERSON>. Really..really sad. Amusing no doubt but sad. \n\nAlso nice try at a moral highground with the who am I to tell these people how to feel. I'm not telling people how to feel, I'm simply counteracting bullshit and doomsday preachers cause I honestly believe that pessimism and cynicism make the world a shitty place where nothing good happens and no one takes risks. \n\nBut alas dear <PERSON>, you cannot convince me to refund and post about it on your sad goon nest, for as your aware I cannot. No do I feel sorry for your silly attempts at sounding reasonable by helping getting burned people their money back. That reddit exists for the sole purpose of spreading false hatred about CIG. Any pro CIG posts on the page get obliterated by goon and your poor gullible victims. I do not feel pity for the people allegedly \"harassed\" by other backers and close friends for refunding, for many of them are not real. \n\nNow this has been genuinely fun, but I'm going to move on from this incredibly pointless discussion until next I feel bored at 3 in the morning and the ACTUAL things I'm doing on reddit are taking a while to accumulate posts.", "247" ], [ "No there is plenty of bias. Your to justify it with circle logic. If you really believed those things you would get a refund and move the fuck on. But no you hang around trying to convince others. You fear...what if it does succeed. All these horrible things I've been saying are bullshit. So you moan and preach and convince people to join your side. It's so SAD. You have your refund. Leave, move on with your life. Don't post on the sad sub-reddit that is TOTALLY there just to aid in getting refunds and isn't there to convince people to hate on CIG.", "837" ], [ "Because I enjoy watching the game develop. I enjoy seeing the cool ships they make. I enjoy theory crafting what the future game MIGHT be when it very probably comes out in a reasonable time frame that your not preaching. I enjoy hanging out on the <PERSON> reddit laughing as he tries to hard to spread his lies because I've followed his antics since he infiltrated Quest Online and fucked them royally. \n\nBut mostly, I hate, nay loathe seeing narcissistic pessimistic cynical trolls pathetically attempt to derail ambitious projects for lols. I hate seeing people ruining stuff because they hate other people enjoy it. I dislike having a enjoyable day on reddit browsing a multitude of forums and seeing people spreading bullshit and false claims they've pulled out of their assess and convincing a bunch of gullible people they're correct.", "342" ], [ "Elite Dangerous, even though I enjoyed what I played, has ACTUALLY failed to deliver promises and \"released\" a barebones skeleton no where near the ambition of this project. Then had the gall to put the promised features behind FULL PRICE paywalls. Sure charge for expansions, but not full price for a penitence of content.\n\nAlso FYI, the SC:2 also outsourced, very common in games industry so that excuse is..pointless and doesn't effect my argument at all.", "838" ], [ "Nope, because I have principals. Don't back early-access products. Doesn't matter how much I believe the project will succeed. I got a tight budget and shitty laptop, so been a sensible high functioning adult I went \"Can't run the game, it's alpha and I'm poor. Better not put money into it, and when it's done I'll probably be in a lot better financial position and can buy a decent computer\". \n\nSee your point makes no fucking sense, there is a dozen reasons I can not fund the game and still think it'll succeed without \"doubts\" and even if I had doubts.....SO? If I have one doubt, and a dozen reasons to believe it succeeds, I think I'd my bias would learn towards the succeeding bit don't you.", "905" ], [ "Ahaha, so obsessed with countering my point you went and read other replys. Unlike you I can back up my statements without backpedaling or personal attacks. See there is no such thing as a sure thing, but there is probability. From my observations the game is more likely to succeed than fail, by a fir margin but I'm not gonna pull numbers from my ass like armchair developers and trolls prefer. \n\nNow please go look for more contradictions in my other replies so I can correct you ^_^", "286" ], [ "No no you see, I'm not telling them to trust them no matter what. I'm telling them to take all these negative comments by people with clear ulterior motives with...a tanker ship full of salt. If it fails, oh well it's a very sad day for now other developers will be scared to try for such a ambitious project and that hurts gaming in general. I'll be sad cause despite not having a cent in the game I do look forward to potentially playing it one day. Also my economic situation provided very basic clear reasons for not putting money into the project, as to counter all bullshit people might pull outta their ass to explain WHY, like \"I have doubts you hypocrite\"", "342" ], [ "Sorry just reading through all your replies which oddly enough are only to me, I'm flattered. You haven't really said anything. You've mostly been contradicting what I'm saying with statements that you haven't offered proof of. \n\nYou put a comparisson between Yandere Devs development and the Holiday Livestream. Yes Yandere Dev is far more open, but as I've pointed out to others there isn't a set standard for open development. CIG is more open than MANY companies but not all. If you believe that \"Open DEV\" is ONLY the way Yandere's dev does that well good for you but your not the person who defines how open a company has to be for it to be \"open development\". But if we go down that rabbit hole we're just going to be arguing semantics and that goes no where. Though that does mean your \"false\" because you can't prove that what open development IS as a fact. Again semantics.\n\nLets see well I can be cheeky and say your 100% false on me projecting but that isn't your point, though it is one thing but thats no fun.\n\nIn fact going back to my first point, I can't 'prove' much because mostly arguing the semantics of what open development is. I feel I could link to one Totalbiscuit's short summary of why comapring Star Citizens development to No Man's Sky is fucking stupid cause be basically lists how Star Citizen is been rather open. A list I'm too fucking lazy to aquire. \n\nI can't prove anything you said was false that matters, cause you've passionately argued nothing but subjective matters on what does and doesn't count as open development.\n\nSo you know what, let me be a \"child\" as you put before and say your false on this claim\n > I only get involved when useful idiots like you try to deceive people and pretend everything is fine. It's not. \n\nThis is false on many fronts, one everything is fine because the games still been developed and CIG is making money so on a purely technical (as in development not \"technically right\" context) front everything is fine. Secondly I am not here telling everyone everything is fine, I am telling them people like you shouldn't be listened too due to immense bias, ulterior motives and just general asshatery. \n\nThirdly, looking at your history you involved at lot more on the refund_reddit which to be fair isn't THIS sub, but it IS the star citizen community and your there spreading you bullshit trying to deceive them. Don't even pretend that reddit exists to help people, any positive discussion there about CIG is shot down faster than troll posts on here.", "161" ], [ "Oh bless you, your trying so hard. No I;m not telling people to trust CIG completely that's stupid. I'm telling them not to believe people like you. I'm telling them to ignore clearly bias and ulterior motive driven people like yourself. The obsessed with the game passionate people and you are two sides of the same coin. \n\nI hope people ignore you, and look at the info they're given, listen industry experts and make their own opinions. I then hope if they come to a negative one they move on and don't spend precious moments trying to convince others to follow them like some sorta holy messiah.", "342" ], [ "Well fair enough, but ultimately our discussion is coming back around to \"I hopes\". We can only work with what we have seen, and in my opinion what I have seen shows sensible progress. Not the progress <PERSON> optimistically proclaims or hope for himself but not bad progress. I'm also an optimistic person and think okay at current rates and compared to other developers I believe we're gonna get a fantastic product. \n\nYou can have the negative scale of that all you want and I'll come along and counter you because the company has shown no malice or ill intentions that leads me to believe they're obscuring info on purpose to roll in more money and are way further behind than they let on.", "647" ], [ "AH the projecting comment again you've literally read the other thread chain I had with <PERSON> and taking stuff from that. \n\nI just told you what I do, I don't tell them to be blind sheep. You ignored my point because it doesn't fit your narrative. There is nothing more to be discussed here, cause clearly your just gonna take stuff from my other convo and regurgitate it here, so let me just say go read my reply to said complain in that thread.", "248" ], [ "Okay so if I put that in a simplified way, I'm having a battle where we have..3000 points. I can have as many detachments and formations as I want as long was the total of the army falls within 3000 points. I can have one whole detachment be 2000 points, and then another two detachments be lets be simple 500 points each. \n\nAlso from what I understand these detachments don't necessarily have to be from the same codex but there are other rules governing that.", "105" ], [ "Nah, cause the idea behind it is to also give you room to level up multiple jobs easily. Someone who played from the start who had to wait each patch had the \"luxury\" of downtime and thus grinding new jobs/classes was a time sink.\n\nIf the boost was so that it just kept you on par with the content, it would be a pain to level up a second job, and even harder to do a third one cause presumably you'd end up burning through all the sidequests you've skipped to get exp for the second. \n\nA major selling point of FFXIV and a part of the experience is been able to effortlessly just change jobs on the fly without needing to make an entirely new character or respeccing stats or anything.\n\nWhen your 3 expansions deep, new players who don't want to skip want to experience the story AND catch-up to everyone else in a timely matter all while getting a similar experience to what everyone else got that made them fall in love with the game. Grinding slowly to level up jobs beyond your first one is not the way to do this.\n\nBesides every expansions once you hit end-game everything comes down to your gear, and level-sync in dungeons and quest Duties means your never OP. Everything syncs you down. All been over leveled lets you do is nuke random mobs, which you mostly avoid fighting.", "360" ], [ "Not really. Its just <PERSON> with XIV style Viera. She needs to look \"like\" <PERSON> from XII, but XIV Viera have the more rabbit like noses than XII's, and less face fuzz. So to make her look like <PERSON> meant shes gonna look a little outta place with the standard Viera faces.\n\nNo different that <PERSON> been a <PERSON> with ZERO resemblance in his face to either Sea Wolf or Hellsguard imo. He looks like a Hyur with a Roe body, but he's a Roe according to the devs, just different. He stands out next to any other Roe cause he lacks those features they have. <PERSON> stands out to other Viera cause she's trying to look like a FFXII Veira using XIV assets.", "887" ], [ "Well mainline FF game vs FFXIV in game graphics are always gonna be a tad jarring. XII was an extremely pretty game even on the PS2 release. Especially in the cutscenes. \n\nHonestly prefer FFXIV Veira tho, they don't have XII's creepy extra long fingers and like..5cm like finger nails.", "369" ], [ "It's been the lore for donkey's years man, it probably was sourced from some old art book they released, and then pieced together. \n\nEven without such a direct source, stuff like how the giant sword in Pokke Village made from Fatalis parts regenerates when people knock chunks off, related lore about how Dire Malis can apparently regenerate from just its heart can all be connected to come to a fairly good conclusion of where this lore comes from.\n\nYou have lore about how the gear takes \"possession\" of the hunters who wear it, and lore about how Fatalis parts regenerate despite been fashioned into armor and weapons, and its not hard to reach the conclusion of \"Fatalis parts possess hunter, make them wander off into the wilderness, and then the armor slowly regenerates back into Fatalis, consuming the hunter in the process\"", "823" ], [ "I think bigger difference is Undertale is an \"instant classic\" that will probably stand the test of time as a fantastic game.\n\nFNaF was a fad game powered entirely by streamer and youtube culture. It was a very..barebones game. Not an instant classic, just popular at one point. You say its still going very strong, but its never in gaming news, no one big streams it.", "372" ], [ "If our PM was still <PERSON>, this might've resulted in something cause <PERSON> is a Tory in everything but name, and worshiped the ground they walked on. He was a man married to the idea of making Australia go back to been closer to merry old England and would've jumped at the chance to appease the British Conservatives.\n\n<PERSON> won't listen, not unless the order comes from one of his looney Pentecostal religious mentors.", "365" ], [ "Yeah sure buddy, keep defending empire creation just cause you got a chip on your shoulder against a dead empire. All hail the resurgent Imperial China. People like you with your moronic \"China is doing nothing wrong\" mindset will only see the world suffer. All so you can jack off your hate boner for the \"west\"", "347" ], [ "I dunno, your clearly a plant, what with your 1 day old account and only here to try and paint the picture of China good. \n\nBut on topic since when was ANY part of Tibet or Mongolia China's? These aren't China, China claims its theirs cause at some point in history a previous version of China owned it. How far back should we go? At one point China took over parts of Korea, should it claim those too? How about Japan, it was initially settled by humans who sailed over there from the mainland?\n\nWhy stop with just China, at one point Italy owned most of Europe as the Roman Empire, and it lost all its lands due to other countries invading, surely using your dumbass logic we should give every former area back to them cause they lost them due to invasion. \n\nLets go another angle, give Mongolia all the land it lost from when it used to be an Empire, it had all that land taken from it!\n\nSo tell me again how China taking over territory it last controlled when it was Imperial China isn't empire creation? China is worse than the British Empire ever was, cause at least the British Empire voluntarily dissolved. China wants to control all of Asia again, when it **has no fucking right to**", "839" ], [ "1: Omanyte's dex entry notes people are reviving then releasing Pokemon into the wild routinely, or the revived Pokemon are escaping. This creates lore precedent for wild Fossil Pokemon \n\n2: One of Calyrex's dex entires notes at its peak powers it managed to move an entire forest and its Pokemon to a new location. It is also able to see into the past, present and future, and using this foresight ability it once led the Pokemon under its charge to safety, saving them from a Meteor strike. \n\nUsing this context, along with the rather isolated nature of the Crown Tundra, its perfectly explainable why Pokemon that went extinct elsewhere are still flourishing in this area. They have a benevolent god Pokemon that by its very nature and powers causes..nature to flourish and the land to be bountiful. Unlike other regions, anywhere under Calyrex's direct domain didn't have the same pressures that would lead to Pokemon going extinct. For example Omastar was said to have gone extinct because its prey species became to fast for it to hunt. Calyrex would never let Pokemon in his domain go hungry so it would've found a way to feed them etc.", "935" ], [ "Mega Aerodactyls dex entries specifically note its mega form is its true prehistoric form. From Ultra Moon \n\n > Mega Evolution awakened some dormant genes, bringing back the sharp rocks that once covered Aerodactyl's entire body. \n\nFrom the Let's Go Games \n\n > The power of Mega Evolution has completely restored its genes. The rocks on its body are harder than diamond. \n\nThen from Swords dex entry for normal \n\n > This is a ferocious Pokémon from ancient times. Apparently even modern technology is incapable of producing a perfectly restored specimen. \n\nMeaning the ones in the Tundra are released/escaped specimens most likely. Considering there are relatively few in the overworld this is acceptable.", "300" ], [ "It's a public poll, and I'm gonna go with most people think <PERSON> a threat because he emboldens what we consider the far-right groups in politics here. Americas political parties are very much skewed to the right, with your left wing party been closer to where the middle is in our system an your right wing been where we consider our 'far right'. What you call far right we call insane people who shouldn't be involved in government at all. \n\n<PERSON> inspires our far-right to try and push for more control, stuff like privatising/deregulating university fees, selling off our public broadcaster, laxer gun control. Such things are a threat to Australian values and in theory shouldn't be cause of voting, yet because of what can only be described as gross laziness they have a real chance of getting into power simply because they're part of the \"team\" a certain demographic vote for.", "211" ], [ "The ecological key here isn't drastically reducing livestock but carefully selecting what livestock is produced where. The fact Australia's environment is NOT suit to animals like cows. Many countries..really shouldn't be farming cows, sheep and pigs as primary meat sources. They should be working towards farming animals that are better suited to the environment they live in, rather than what is done now. \n\nContinuing with the Australia example, we've got a massive feral camel population, and Kangaroos. Now obviously roos aren't anywhere near as easy to \"farm\" as cows, but studies should be looked into how they can be used. Can't exactly herd them but you can pen them. Camels on the other hand can be farmed, and they're a lot less impactful on the land than heavy hoofed animals.\n\nWith the population humans have, you could never realistically ditch farming, but we can ditch the almost homogenised way we farm globally. Europeans went and conquered most of the world, and brought with them their preferred food animals and made most of the world change to farm and eat those. \n\nCountries should identifying then adapting their agricultural systems to farming the animals that have the least environmental impact and thus in the long run have more sustainable food sources.", "166" ], [ "> The objective there is not to thoroughly eradicate every single horse, but to bring them back to manageable levels\n\n > To be clear, the New South Wales Government's Brumbies Bill is not about making the Brumby a protected species, it's about finding a balance to manage sensitive areas of the National Park, whilst managing the population of Brumbies without lethal culling\n\nThey are FERAL. You don't MANAGE the population, you REMOVE IT. These horses shouldn't have a population left to manage by the time the job is done. They shouldn't be kept around just cause a few weepy eyed baby boomers and old codgers are nostalgic about an old <PERSON>. \n\nThey're not native, they're not \"iconic\". They're an invasive pest they should be removed. Like good on them going the humane route fully support that but fk don't stop at \"manageable level\".\n\nIt's a disgrace we're probably going to have to wait half a century before all the politicians who would actually view a population of feral animals as \"iconic things that must be protected\" die off.", "431" ], [ "You'd be surprised. Knew a girl in uni, was raised in a completely non-religious environment, didn't even give a shit. Moved across the country, met some new friends at that uni who encouraged her to come to their bible study club (I swear every uni has one of these)\n\nLike a year later she's making posts and stuff like she was raised with a bible in her hand. Stuff like thanking her friends in the Sunday club for saving her soul, and acknowledging she was a lost sheep. \n\nLike religious indoctrination isn't something that shouldn't be hand waved. This was a girl with zero religious background, who just went to a bible study club.", "193" ], [ "I think to do KoTOR right, it would have to be a trilogy, and would require some modifications to the story. A few of the crew would have to be cut or given like...secondary character roles rather than crew positions. Cut out the planet of Mannan completely, if this was a TV show that entire planet is considered a filler season. \n\nThe main cast would HAVE to be <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> and..probably <PERSON>. <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON> can be secondary, <PERSON> can be cut outright or used as an antagonist. I love her but she's probably has the LEAST bearing on the plot, even more than Mission. At least Mission exists to be <PERSON>'s contemporary. \n\nFirst movie is entirely the events on Taris, and Dantooine. Have it so <PERSON> is rescued earlier, and have the realisation of Revans jedi powers happen there. That way the climax can be the destruction of Taris, without all the bumbling around on Dantooine. Have like 85% of the film dealing with the events on Taris, then the last bit arriving on Dantooine, getting accepted for some training, and have the hanger finding the temple that talks of the \"map\". But don't have a piece there. Keep <PERSON> around, set him up as a proper antagonist. Make him extra deadly, make him some sort of specialist Jedi hunter. \n\nSecond movie...make it so the map isn't fragmented. Have there be only one place for the map, but have it \"lost\". Have them fly to Tatooine to go recover HK-47, who having worked for <PERSON> and <PERSON> actually has the maps location. Next go with <PERSON> and crew making their way to Kashyyyk where the map is located. Can probably omit the whole \"zaalbar family dispute\" bit. Meet up with <PERSON> who's still a hermit but also a sort of guardian of the map. Have a mild set-back revealing the map isn't complete. Then the Sith attack Kashyyyk, giving reason to why <PERSON> leaves and while trying to escape they get captured. Have the whole situation on the Leviathan happen, revealing <PERSON>'s identity and also revealing <PERSON>'s sons location (have <PERSON>'s missing son be a bigger thing, have <PERSON> more present, in a kind of '<PERSON>' style\"). Also reveal <PERSON> sabotaged the map, but has a copy on Korriban. In tradition of star wars trilogies, have it end after they escape with everything on a downer. \n\nHave <PERSON> kidnapped but..don't have her turn. Instead make it so she can be forced to use her battle meditation using some sort of dark side device found on Rakata\n\nThird Film opens with them infiltrating Korriban, finding <PERSON> son. Not sure whether to go edgelord route and have him die or have a happy plot resolution for <PERSON>. Find the complete map, **THEN** meet up with the Republic fleet and head for Rakata. Have the fleet engage the Sith Fleet happening at the same time as the events on the planet rescuing <PERSON>. I know it's a bit too close to \"One team on Endor dealing with generator, fleet fighting in space\" but you can't avoid it. I love KoTOR but the Republic fleet just kinda arrives out of nowhere. \n\nRakata team finds <PERSON> in the device, have final confrontation with <PERSON> (he's shown up every movie, but I ceebs thinking of how to work him in at this stage). Rescue <PERSON> and rendezvous with the fleet. Find out even without Battle Meditation the Sith are still winning, a team needs to infliltrate the Star Forge and sabotage it. Team inflitrates, <PERSON> ends up in a solo duel with <PERSON>, good guys win, the end.", "196" ], [ "I just spend 4 hours in Monster Hunter Generations farming Uragaans to get a single marrow. I like Uragaan but it is probably THE MOST boring monster to farm cause it's so tanky and heavy and annoying.\n\nAfter farming what must've been like 12 low rank ones, decided to fight one high rank one cause it's body carves drop marrow unlike low. Killed it, didn't get a marrow from the tail, or the carve, or as a break reward. I was about to sigh and go back to low rank farming when my legend of a Palico randomly had one. Thankyou <PERSON> ;-;", "190" ], [ "I honestly think the general public believe they're doctors solely because they tend to wear lab coats. I wear a lab coat, but I'm studying physics. Bet $100 if I was nearby someone who thinks chiropractors are real doctors, in my lab coat, and a real doctor in his casual clothing was stand there also, and they had some sort of medical emergency they would ask me instantly to help.\n\nI would then proceed to panic cause I choose to do physics because biological sciences make me feel queezy.", "723" ], [ "Various choices in clothing. If a women wears something showing a lot of skin, they're shamed for apparently been some sort of slut. If a guy wears a singlet and comfy shorts people assume they're some sort of trailer park trash/bogan who drinks or beats their wife. If a girl wears clothing of a style that's more traditionally associated with mens fashion, shamed for not been feminine enough, assumed to be gay and then shamed for that. If a guy outright wears ANY piece of clothing traditionally only women wear: Shamed for been some sort of pervert, or a closeted homosexual or transgender person in denial. \n\nBasically: What random piece of fking fabric a person decides to hide their genitals with/protect themselves from the sun for some reason is important enough that if they choose the \"wrong\" clothing it's shameful.", "506" ], [ "My older brothers in the military and we grew up next to a military couple. They always always always told him \"when you get your payment after your first deployment, DON'T BUY A CAR, put a down payment on a house or something\"\n\nWhelp he's been in a military for ..6 years? Still driving the shitty pos first car he ever bought so took the advice to heart I guess XD", "920" ], [ "Can't get drunk. I can and do drink, but I have a threshold before it starts having negative health effects, the most immediate signal of \"you're getting to your 'stop or start dying' dumbass\" limit is heart pains. \n\nThis threshold is less than the amount it would take for me to get smashed.\n\nTherefore I can't related to any of the dumb shit everyone else has done. Can't say I'm envious.", "594" ], [ "People sitting in my blind spot for anything longer than 2 seconds and I'm not talking about driving blind spots I mean the literal point directly behind you where even if you turn your head you generally can't see without also twisting your body.\n\nLike I have to walk through a pedestrian tunnel every day to get to uni from the train station. The amount of unbridled rage that bubbles up inside me when I know there is someone walking directly behind me. \n\nIt very much depends on how close they are, but if they're standing in that spot that requires me to physically turn my body to see them, I feel so fucking angry. I just wanna spin around and punch them in the face. \n\nIt's a completely illogical rage, it's a crowded pedestrian tunnel leading out of the biggest train station in the city. But logic be damned, don't you dare fucking walk in my blind spot. I got an anxiety disorder bitch I will deck you for doing nothing wrong and walking to work calmly. \n\nWe are in a loud ass, smelly ass tunnel, the only sense I could possibly ascertain your location with is my eyes so please stand somewhere I can sub-consciously keep track of you at all times in case one of the bullshit scenarios my anxiety invents comes true.", "461" ], [ "Does a nightcore remix count? I know nightcore gets mocked relentlessly but I genuinely love [this nightcore version of Face Down by Red Jumpsuit Apparatus, sounds more like they got a female grunge singer to cover the song](_URL_0_)\n\nWhich I honestly prefer. Cause fuck RJA, those guys came to a gig in my city, then got into a big beef and fight with the photographer at the event cause they didn't want to pay for the photos. They were professional band literally trying to argue the \"exposure\" he was getting was enough. Pulled the whole \"do you know who we are\" fuck me your not that famous.", "782" ], [ "Oh yeah, fk even the Yogscast attribute a portion of their success to him, even after he had a falling out with the main 2 (<PERSON> and <PERSON>) and their CEO (<PERSON>). <PERSON> the other week had a cute little ramble about what <PERSON> meant to him on a live-stream. He was cautious to avoid bringing up their spat and was just genuinely sad to see the crap <PERSON> was going through.\n\nFrom some of the condolences I'm seeing on Twitter, a fair few regret now that he's gone they didn't thank him enough for what he did for them.", "936" ], [ "Well he was suffering from a condition that caused him to retain fluid. It was crushing his organs and spine causing him immense pain. He had a procedure last week to drain the fluid. He was saying he felt fine cause the pain was all gone.\n\nBut considering the condition his body was in from the cancer, on top of trying to recover from the procedure...well you can probably guess his body just couldn't hold up. In theory if he didn't have the procedure he might've been still alive...but in terrible pain.", "288" ], [ "I have to wonder how he would feel to see how loved he truly was. His reach was amazing, I've seeing Reddit's for games I'd forgotten he played with 100+ up-vote farewells. I'm seeing posts on Warhammer and Wrestling subs. The man might not have had millions upon millions of subscribers, but fuck he was loved.\n\nThe Yogscast are running the magika playthrough on their stream, the League of Legends twitter account have made the TotalBiscuit their DP.", "919" ], [ "There's a big difference between a major political event, and the passing of a single man. He wasn't a big time celebrity, he wasn't even one of those insanely popular YouTubers with millions of views each video. Yet his passing has caused what seems like half of reddit to go into mourning. It's not just Blizzard gaming subs or PC Gaming subs. Any thing this man showed an interest in, he improved. \n\n\nFor context, he was a massive Wrestling fan and two professional WWE wrestlers took to twitter to share their condolences \\(Those been <PERSON> and <PERSON>). Various Warhammer 40k subreddits are sharing their condolences. The official Blizzard, Twitch, Youtube Reddits offered their thanks to him. \n\n\nHe wasn't a famous man...he was someone the gaming community and beyond truly loved and respected. There have been \"true\" celebrities who have passed with less fanfare.", "919" ], [ "Well it's kinda...<PERSON> called out the bs that was \"YogsDiscovery\" and then <PERSON> got hyper defensive started saying crap about TB's business decisions and accusing him of equally dodgy shit. Then <PERSON> kinda just started slagging him off and directly insulting him. \n\n<PERSON> kinda got lumped in with it cause Yogsdiscovery was kinda his idea also due to been CEO. <PERSON> and <PERSON> kinda got over it, and <PERSON> seemed to stop caring...but at same time never showdd an interest it making amends...which goes for <PERSON> as well.\n\nHonestly it was a very English way to deal with a falling out. Get over and ignore it ahahaa.", "34" ], [ "This is what always gets me when someone dies. When you know they had stuff they were planning to do. Very rarely does one know exactly when death is upon them. \n\nHe probably had guests lined up for future Podcasts, had some boardgames on order. \n\nIt's knowing stuff like this that really gets to me. No one should have to go when they're not done yet. It's like <PERSON> all over again to me. They both had things they not just wanted to do, but were actively planning to do in the near future. \n\nI can just imagine what the next podcast would've been reading this. He probably wanted to do a WTF is of it. \n\nThis breaks me fuck.", "168" ], [ "Well...that's also kinda what <PERSON> is famous for. He was one of if not the first voice in the gaming community to go out and try to get the medium of game journalism, review, and professional play to be taken seriously. While the community had people like <PERSON> just going out and doing what the common person thought gamers do, there was <PERSON> basically making videos that served as a buyers guide in a age where no one made demos and \"official\" review sites were paid for by the publishers.\n\nIt's sad the mainstream still doesn't quite take his message seriously, that people in this industry are just as professional as any other and deserve the same respect...but it says a lot for how far we've come when a major news source is dedicating an article to him at all.", "342" ], [ "Pretty sure the yogscast thing was about their unquestionably dodgy \"Yogsdiscovery\" program where they were agreeing to review indie games, and in return if those games saw a large boost in sales they would get a cut of those sales. \n\nTB called it BS cause there is NO WAY to confirm those sales boosted solely because of their coverage. \n\nThankfully shortly after falling out, the Yogs ditched the pos program.", "892" ], [ "Ofc. There is nothing wrong about sex, and been paid for sex is a very very old industry. It's only because of religious pressures it became taboo. If it was legalised and regulated like any other business, it would give people who have no qualms about been paid for sex an option to work in a protected environment, in a hygienic environment, and an environment where they won't be stigmatised for doing something everyone else does for free with their partners.", "544" ], [ "Well you've already bought it but I can explain the difference between Sun/Moon and Ultra. \n\nThe story is slightly different, with more focus on your rival than your travelling companion <PERSON>. There is an increased focus on the \"Ultra Wormhole\" sub-plot vs the original versions. \n\nYou can go surfing on a Mantine with kickass music\n\nThere are more varieties of wild Pokemon. \n\nI'd also very much recommend the Omega Ruby/Alpha Sapphire versions. They're amazing a literally jam packed with shit to do.", "935" ], [ "Both will 100% give you fresh. As would XY. \n\nI've played every Pokemon game, and the sheer leap visually and control wise in XY from gen 5 made me feel like I was playing Red and Blue again in my sense of wonder of the world and it's creatures.\n\nThe Ruby and Sapphire remakes took my nostalgia for Gen 3 and placed it in this new 3d universe.\n\nThen Sun and Moon showed me even more new styles to play with no HM's and no Gyms.", "935" ], [ "So I've only got a small collection cause I mostly buy them to make odd customised models. With that context I've been watching series I never bothered with to get inspiration when I saw the adorably lame CMS\\-328 Desperado in Gundam: AGE and decided immediately I want one. After spending a good hour searching I'm stumped. \n\nThe Gundam wikia has a picture of a 1/144 model of it but when I go searching various online outlets I can't find any. I'm not sure they even made it???. Usually I eventually can find any kit I desire, even if they're older kits. Can someone direct me towards it because I'm finding zilch. I want my silly mining mech dammit.", "484" ], [ "Well from a scientific point of view, organisms exist to pass on their genetic information. Every creatures adaptations exist solely around the idea of \"survive long enough to produce viable offspring\". Then some creatures have the additional factor of \"Ensure offspring survives long enough to produce own viable offspring\". Other creatures take what I call the shotgun approach of \"Make as many offspring as you can before you die, one is bound to live\"", "931" ], [ "That statement was only true when <PERSON> and <PERSON> first appeared. FE is now one of Nintendos biggest, stable franchises. \n\nThey need to accept it, get over it, and shut up about it. Don't see everyone constantly bitching about how a character from a LITERALLY DEAD franchise got in. \n\nMost of the time they're just a bunch of entitled self-centred Americans who can't handle the world doesn't revolve around them and their tastes", "1011" ], [ "I find furry **groups** weirdly predatory. \n\nLike average furry, perfectly fine, bit weird of a lifestyle choice, maybe a bit to..open about sharing their kink (if been a furry is a kink for that specific person) but on the whole fine.\n\nBut specific organised groups online, they almost actively seek out marginalised people and go \"Come to us, everyone is welcome here\". You'll meet many an ex-furry who said they went through a phase of been one cause they were also gay, or trans or just any kind of marginalised group and this group of friendly people welcomed them in, with the added condition you also embrace been a furry. I've met people in university who will open up about how they used to be a furry or a hardcore \"Brony\" when that was a thing. They joined for the camaraderie and just kinda went along with the lifestyle/kink\n\nIt's not hard to see why Nazis would laser focus those groups, cause those Furry groups actively seek out members, rather than just been \"everyone's welcome\" and simply letting people join as they come, they actively encourage people to become furries on LBGT boards etc. Cause how tempting is that to some nut-job nazi trying to manipulate younger peoples way of thinking, a group that actively seeks out marginalised, isolated people and brings them out of hiding and onto the internet.", "743" ], [ "The issue is, the one Nazi who will listen is in groups of 9 others who wilfully ignore you. And the rate of \"converting someone away from hate\" is a slow one, compared to how quickly the fuckers can radicalise some kid who gets bullied cause its got a bit of a gut, or funny teeth, or bad at Fortnite or whatever stupid shit kids bully other kids over.", "743" ], [ "From his page:\n\n > Witness Meteor Assault, the signature move of Sirfetch'd!\nMeteor Assault is a new move introduced in these games that only Sirfetch'd can learn! Sirfetch'd points its leek at the opponent and charges toward them at great speed. This move is devastatingly powerful! However, it appears that the move also puts great strain on Sirfetch'd. It will be unable to take action immediately after using this move.\n\nSo while it is a signature move, sounds like we got a Fighting-Type Hyper Beam", "183" ], [ "I try to give the benefit of the doubt, for example I know there are say crossdressers who don't get any sexual rise out of it, they just enjoy the fashion expression. Almost on the same level of \"cosplaying\", just not as a specific character etc. Enjoyment out of fashion. \n\nWhen it comes to something that is wholly \"aesthetic\" in function, I try not to just assume the person gets off on it be default. \n\nBut you are right that on the internet..most furries do it for a kink.", "506" ], [ "Agree with everything except some of the framees you listed as needing to be fixed. Obviously bias'd by my flair, but <PERSON> is honestly fine. Her 2 needs better scaling, but her 3 other abilities are fine. <PERSON> is also fine, shes got 1 lacklustre ability I don't know what you think is wrong with her. <PERSON> does need a look cause he's a 1 trick pony. \n\nYou've fallen into the trap of thinking \"I don't like this frames playstyle\" as \"This frame needs to be fixed\".", "887" ], [ "No, I feel like the invincibility is an essential part. It's not about been able to keep herself alive, it's meant to represent the idea of a berserker rage, where they become a literally invincible murder machine that shrugs off all damage.\n\nIt would also break the drawback that most people forget it has\n\n > <PERSON> emits an aura with a radius of 5 meters around her while <PERSON> is active, and 30% of the total damage she ignores is stored. If any enemies within this aura have line-of-sight of Valkyr when Hysteria is deactivated, Valkyr will be dealt 25% of all stored damage as Impact b Impact damage.\n\nMost people have killed everything in range before they run outta energy/turn it off so they don't notice it. \n\nIt's not meant to be a \"kill shit to stay alive\" mechanic, it's meant to be a \"become a literally unstoppable murder machine\". Your changes completely remove it from it's theme and just make it a generic buff ability with an exalted weapon", "453" ], [ "Crossdressing\" is literally just wearing clothes. Aesthetic appreciation is a thing, it's why fashion trends and styles are a thing. If a women likes traditionally mens clothes aesthetically, or a man likes traditionally womens clothes aesthetically, they can (and do) wear them with no sexual or gender driven motive, they just want to express that aesthetic. \n\nWhat you seem to be implying is those who would say crossdress not as a fetish wish to be seen as the sex they dress as, where as the rest do it as a fetish. But there are plenty of people who \"dress as a women\" who are fine been called a crossdresser cause they're men who..like the clothing, and visa versa. They're not transgender, nor do they derive sexual joy from the act. It's just clothing to them.\n\nSo following that truth of the matter, it's only logical to assume that among the..\"furry community\" there must be some who just like the aesthetics of looking like a animal and doesn't derive what we'd view as \"sexual joy\" from it. There logically must be SOME...even if it's a small minority...who just enjoy \"how it looks\" or find it \"fun to dress up\".", "506" ], [ "Well see, I learned nothing, cause I knew the information already. I know the difference between been and being, but this is Reddit and the Internet. I have no need to go back over what I rapidly type, no need to pay attention to each word, as all that matters is my general intent is conveyed. In theory I could type every word wrong, having only the first and last letter correct and most people would be able to read it flawlessly. See cause, despite using the wrong spelling, the context within the rest of the sentence makes that spelling mistake a moot point. \n\nOnly someone who is been anal, someone who is nitpicking for the sake of nitpicking, someone who is slowly reading each word like a child who's only recently learned how to read or perhaps someone learning it as a second language would notice or care. The latter two wouldn't comment on it, and the former two do it for the ego boost.\n\nIn other words: Keep your \"lessons\" to yourself, and don't be a pretentious dick. Also go work on your self-esteem if you need the validation of correcting others on the internet to feel good.", "247" ], [ "Because it follows the concept of berserker rage. You get backed into a corner, fly into a rage, slaughter all your enemies, and emerge victorious.\n\nIt wouldn't seem very victorious if you came out of Hysteria on whatever low HP you went into with. \n\nAs for why have lifesteal and armor buff on a invincible frame? Because some people build around her other abilities. Some people prefer using their own melee weapons over the claws, with Warcry. Sometimes you dont wanna go into Hysteria cause its better to shoot. Not every ability in a frames kit has to have synergism with every other ability. \n\nI know that's a weird concept to some who gush about it, but all the frames need is for their abilities to all be USEFUL, not all play off each other. When they do, GREAT. Doesn't suddenly mean every frame whos abilities don't play off each other is now crap or needs a rework to make them do so. \n\nSynergy isn't the sole marker of a \"good frame\".", "476" ], [ "I do disagree, cause thats making the rather blind assumption that, (using men for example) any man who dresses in womens clothing MUST want to be a woman, otherwise hes doing it for some fetish kink. Anyone outside of that is an outlier which its very improbable. On something as base as clothing and aesthetics, there would never be such a binary distribution with a tiny outlier group in between.\n\nYou'd probably find, MOST \"actual\" crossdressers (as in, not transgender people who may or may not have come to the realisation they are trans) do not gain sexual joy from it. Many might get a \"thrill\" out of it due to the \"taboo\" nature of it, but thrill does not = kink. Otherwise everyone who goes on a roller coaster is having a very perverted time. Many others do it for the literal aesthetic satisfaction. \n\nUsing a non-crossdressing example, I quite enjoy to wear a sleevless vest rather than a suit jacket with my formal wear. I enjoy how it looks on me, how it fits, it's comfortable, seeing myself in the mirror in it creates a sense of satisfaction. I don't pop a boner from any of that. Some people might tut-tut cause not wearing the jacket isn't \"correct\" but no ones gonna accuse me of doing it for a kink. \n\nThe reason you probably perceive this group as \"exceptionally small\", is cause of our (from a outsider context) weird taboo on who can wear what clothes. If men wearing \"female\" style clothing was as widely ubiquitous and normalised as women wearing what was once \"mens\" clothing, you wouldn't come to that conclusion. However as it is (once again in outsider context) weirdly taboo, the middle ground gets improperly dumped into the same category as the fetishists. Because people can't imagine others partaking in a \"taboo\" practice unless its for some kinda perverted kink.\n\nWere it not a taboo, you'd see that that \"middling\" group is probably the biggest % of the group as a whole.", "506" ], [ "What...no you arr massively overinterpeting that.\n\nFor one, they aren't even on the same planet.\n\nThat is a neat in game reference, it's not LITERALLY the Shinra from FF7. They like playing around with the idea, the guy actually designed and made the Shinra in X2 even said \"who thought it might be good if people would imagine that Shinra would grow up and start the Shinra company\". Whatever <PERSON> says he pulls out of his ass, cause he didn't create mini-shinra he just was producer on X2\n\nIt's literally just something for fun, its not canonical in anyway. Its on the same level of dumb as believing the stupid \"<PERSON> is dead in Majoras Mask\" Game Theory trash", "719" ], [ "He HAS \"turrets\". His Tesla balls are literally turrets. You PLACE THEM, THEY SHOOT THINGS. \n\nThey just happen to be a BIT more imaginative than a generic turret, as they're little balls you can place anyway. \n\nAll your suggestion is, is the same thing except they walk by themselves. Mechanically speaking. \n\nRather than trying to make Vauban into a frame you would enjoy, trying thinking of ways to make <PERSON> a better Vauban. Cause there are people who like <PERSON> believe it or not, and don't want him to become an entirely different frame to appease those who don't like him.", "82" ], [ "No I am sick of moronic armchair developers, who have zero concept of design or even a basic functioning imagination, chucking the exact same fit I am throwing here when DE doesn't develop shit in line with their \"DUR HUR GREAT IDEA\". \n\nIf any of those people designed it a frame, it would be the most boring, generic, crappy frame ever made, and it would need to be completely remade by DE right away.", "370" ], [ "I'm allowed to be angry. Especially when we've seen DE is willing to give in to a single guy having a bitch on Twitter.\n\nI'm allowed to get pissed when some moronic armchair develop, who are the gaming equivalent of those morbidly obese men who sit at home saying they could play football better than the athletes on TV, is trying to turn a frame I enjoy but recognise needs some significant work done, into some generic boring cookie cutter, 5 year olds idea of a \"engineer\". \n\nPart of me genuinely hopes DE makes <PERSON> into the EXACT OPPOSITE of what those people want, just to spite them. But then I'd have to live with that Vauban too.", "272" ], [ "It's still fucking stupid. It's what a 10 year thinks is a \"clever idea\". People who don't give a shit about Vauban right now shouldn't be sitting there getting mad DE isn't gonna use their \"BRILLIANT\" idea to fix him, when there are plenty of people who play and enjoy Vauban, who have given them plenty of other ideas.\n\nConsidering that guy got mad enough to post a thread, I'm GLAD they're not giving him a turret, and hope they don't cave just cause a guy chucked a big whinge on Reddit. \n\nVaubans remake needs to make him cool and unique, not make him generic mc genericson to appease a moron who thinks they know better. \n\nIDK what he needs, but he doesn't need a fking, generic-ass idea like a turret.", "272" ], [ "<PERSON>'s entire concept is he was the \"King of CC\" and area denial. He's not meant to be a murder ball, and unlike what some people want he's not meant to be \"look at me as I run mach 10 through the level, everything exploding in death as I go past\".\n\nHe's meant to be \"Okay I've picked this point, nothing is reaching this point alive\".\n\nSo your idea would work, if they fixed the other abilities to benefit off it. Cause even if it had a damage multiplier stuff like his single charge shred mines don't really benefit.", "354" ], [ "Ah you just assumed I was in blind rage, but I'm only really angry at people genuinely wanting a turret...and people telling me to calm down. Notice any other comment that wasn't one of those two things I gave a fairly normal response. \n\nBeen angry does not = blind rage. \n\nI just think it's stupid on the internet any time someone begins to express anger (not aggression, just generic bog standard anger) the default response is to say calm down. Wtf is wrong with been angry. I'm allowed to get angry and express my anger at things that make me angry, like people holding stupid opinions like giving a space ninja who has the role of area denial and crowd control something as boring and generic as a fucking turret.", "730" ], [ "Oh what a stupid stance. \"Oh it's not the game mechanic we're proposing, ITS YOU\". Wow great argument there. Really. Basically the equivalent of replying to an insult with \"No u\"\n\nPlease tell me all the interesting and varied ways a TURRET would be any more exciting or interesting than his Tesla Balls. You know beyond \"Well it would be exalted\" or \"It could be like a Moa turret\" cause you can literally make mobile turrets right now with his Tesla Balls, and everyone hates those. \n\nSo the fact people are basically willing to accept the exact same thing except it's an exalted and looks \"like turret\" just adds more fuel to the idea of how STUPID it is.", "508" ], [ "Because he already has those. The Tesla Grenades are literally turrets, they just don't look like turrets. They're tiny little turrets you can place anyway.\n\nAll the turret suggestion is, without all the rubbish in the essays they write can be boiled down to is them wanting the exact same thing his 1 already is...but looks like a turret...and is exalted cause they view making stuff exalted as the \"cure all\" cause most exalted weapons are OP as fuck. \n\nIf they made the Tesla Grenades an exalted weapon, those people would still be crying for a \"turret\" cause they don't give a shit about Vauban beyond how his gameplay \"looks\" to them. \n\nThere have been so many other, CREATIVE, suggestions that double down on his CC concept. The turret is the laziest idea.", "59" ], [ "Who in the world sits there and goes \"Hmmm I might be dumb\". What a stupid comeback, it's like planning to fail. \n\nThe post resulted in me making this post was calling DE \"Stupid\". It got 1k upvotes and support from equally unimaginative people, so I figured hey if I call them out as stupid it would probably get their attention, and so far it seems to have worked.", "98" ], [ "But that's EXACTLY what the creatively challenge wingnuts asking for these turrets want. They want a generic ass deployable exalted turret, that MAYBE moves depending on the person asking, that is exalted. \n\nSure DE might dress it up, it might be a floating orb that shoots lasers, or a little robot that follows you around like a Sentinal...but its still a generic ass turret underneath it all. \n\nAt least with the Tesla Balls you can set them up as trip wires as well if you have the augment. \n\nThere have been literally DOZENS of posts with FAR more creative ideas for Vauban, that are INFINITELY more interesting and creative than \"GIVE HIM AN EXALTED TURRET\" spouted by armchair devs who think the silver bullet to everything is to either make it a massive AOE or exalt it.", "59" ], [ "No I'm not mad that they want turrets. I'm pissed off they got mad <PERSON> said \"no we don't want to\". If they're gonna go on about how \"stupid\" it is of DE to not want turrets, I'm gonna explain why they're stupid for wanting it. And if they come here and be mad about, I'm gonna be mad right back. \n\nAs for is it worth working myself up over it, trust me I'm enjoying this more than I am \"worked up\". It's cathartic as fuck to give a piece of my mind to people like that. \n\nYou might think it's childish, or not worth it, but I don't give a fk.", "98" ], [ "While more unique than most turret ideas given I think its still heavily flawed, cause often people who don't play Vauban complain he's not useful cause his abilities require him to sit still, which the turret would require. \n\nNow personally I'd rather they double down on him sitting still and becoming the best CC frame in the game, if you want nothing to touch an objective or area, you take a Vauban. But DE is doing nothing game design wise to encourage such play, and you often see selfish dudes posting on here complaining about people wanting to play slow should go play solo. The stupid \"meta\" demands mobility, and a fixed emplacement turret, even if you control it manually, would receive the same complaints. People would say it's useless in anything but defence and survival, and say the rework failed. \n\nThe rework needs to make Vauban useful...but still Vauban, which I honestly feel a turret just isn't. But a deployable rampart is 10000% more inventive than \"Give him an exalted turret\" which may or may not move. \n\nBut you are right a major reason people hate the Tesla is cause they were weak, but regardless of that they are still literally turrets. People would still shit on them even if they weren't cause they \"don't look like turrets\". DE could make them strong, mod-able, high status little death balls and people would STILL whinge.", "590" ], [ "I seriously doubt you're laughing, no doubt enjoying yourself but you've gotta have a pretty easy to please sense of humour to be laughing at this.\n\nAnd if I presented my opinion in a calm manner, it would've gotten 2 comments, 3 downvotes and ignored. Wow geez, such a great discussion, getting dismissed by some cynical dicks who sit on new poo pooing every thread.", "339" ], [ "Doesn't matter what it looks like, all that matters is the intent. And no I don't give a fk about my ego. \n\nOtherwise I wouldn't make a post like this would I. I'd be the type of d-bag who goes around correcting peoples grammar on Reddit or trying to police how they should act. \n\nAlso for the record, they didn't have an idea. They wrote a essay about how butthurt they are DE said they won't USE an idea, and why DE is stupid for doing so. They didn't go \"I THINK VAUBAN SHOULD HAVE A TURRET\".\n\nNo they went \"I'M MAD DE SAID NO TURRET FOR [reasons], I DISAGREE WITH [reasons], <PERSON> IS STUPID\"", "248" ], [ "There have been plenty of other suggestions, raging from ones that I feel complete make him into a different frame with the same name, to others that fix him as is, and I think that's the best option. \n\nJust cause he's based on a engineer doesn't mean he has to literally become the stereotypical engineer archetype. \n\nBuff the strength of his 1, and make it function like Revenants Danse Macabre in that the damage it inflicts is the damage type the target is weak too. Also give you the ability to stick it to yourself. Fixes the \"none of his abilities really work on the move\" aspect. You become sort of like a suit of tesla armor. \n\nRework 2 into a single ability with multiple functions rather than 4 micro-abilities. Right now it's a mine used to jump/launch enemies for impact damage, a trip wire that..knocks enemies down, a landmine, and a concussion mine. So make it an ability that CC's the enemies while damaging them. Like maybe a laser trip wire than when enemies trip it triggers an explosion that damages those who tripped and launches nearby enemies back, and it has multiple charges instead of a one and done boom. \n\nNo one complains about his 3 and neither do I, probably just fuse it's augment into it.\n\nHis 4 is a much shorter ranged, yet damaging version of <PERSON>'s \"Larva\". Rework it so you can manipulate the vortex rather than fire and forget, let you move it around, that way you can compensate for the short range without invalidating <PERSON>.", "675" ], [ "I've been in the exact same state the entire time. Mad yes, but I genuinely think your imagination is wildly over-estimating how mad I am. As we've been having this chat, and as I've been replying to other peoples comments, I've also been watching youtube..well listening to youtube and playing my new Switch game. \n\nSo yeah I'm mad, but I'm not like...at the keyboard waiting with baited breath for replies. One screen reddit, another youtube, switch in hand.", "265" ], [ "He should stay as a defence frame, but more so he should double down on his original concept. He's got these orbs he uses to channel his abilities, these small devices. It should double down on those sorts of things and just..make them better. He should be this tactical, intelligent frame that uses his devices cleverly, not a generic engineer who sets up commonplace emplacements. \n\nTake his Tesla Grenades, weak, low status chance, only do electricity. So take those, and make them just a bit stronger..but also give them the properties of Revenants \"Danse Macabre\" where the damage adapts to the weakness of its target. You could even be creative in this, if the enemy is weak to fire, the balls shoot flame, if they're weak to radiation they shoot something that looks like a radiation SFX. \n\nThen to give them mobility, allow <PERSON> to stick them to himself. It's tricky sticking them to your pets or other players. So let <PERSON> mount them on himself. This way they're still the little mini-turrets they are, you can still place them strategically, but you can also use them in more mobile missions. \n\nOther things like his 3, it's a anti-gravity field. Work with that, let it capture everything, not just enemies but their munitions as well, and then let him \"reverse\" it, send all their fire back at them. This fixes his weakness compared to other defensive frames like <PERSON> whos \"denfensive\" ability protects and blocks the enemy. \n\nHis 4 is fine, but it gets outshined by <PERSON>'s similar ability, so make it able to do something <PERSON>'s <PERSON> can't: Move. He's got a micro-black hole, let him direct it around while active. Or have it have clever interactions with multiple vortexes. Set up two on either side of a hallway, and anything that walks between them gets ripped in half. \n\nYou can see in his current kit, the idea behind him was to cleverly set up traps and tricks to control an area. Technically a turret fits that...but a turret is so boring and not-warframe. It's a bland \"make him more killy\" sort of approach.", "128" ], [ "Anime, government sent genetically enhanced cockroaches to mars to help terraform it, but when the colonists eventually arrive the roaches had evolved into bipedal with insane strength who slaughter them all. \n\nGovernment then begins genetically modifying humans with animal traits (mostly insects) to fight them. Sounds goofy, but it's very serious in tone. Also very gory, the roachmen literally rip people in half and shit.", "550" ], [ "Ah thankyou very much. Right now I'm doing a subject called Mathematics for physics which is going into double integrals, triple, boundary value problems and all sorts of stuff like that. \n\nMy weird quirk with math that allows me to get through physics subjects despite math learning issues is..if the math problem has a context...I learn it better where as if it's just pure math I get confused. If x, y, z actually mean or represent something I can form logical connections and understand it. \n\nSadly this subject (which is a prerequisite for half the degree, couldn't do quantum as a subject even if I wanted to without passing this) is a pure maths subject so it's...rather draining. \n\nBut thankyou for the advice and encouragement !!", "832" ], [ "Except..been an Aussie, having to deal with the whole NBN fiasco, knowing the attitudes of the people in charge of NBN co and the government...this is trying to find a scapegoat for the atrocious mess they made. \n\nI actually doubt they've done a proper investigation to determine this. Gamers are just an easy target, especially because \"Mr <PERSON> claimed that NBN Co would not have information on the behaviour of end users to confirm they were gamers\". So legally they can't look into if gamers are specifically to blame. \n\nThis is a man in charge of the greatest infrastructure fuck up in Australian history, caused by private telcom interference in politics and politicians pulling the \"well the other party thinks it's a good idea so we disagree\" moron move. This is man who thinks fibre infrastructure is pointless and that we'll be going entirely wireless net in the near future. \n\nSimple fact is, NBN Co and current gov fucked up, constantly looking for a way to paint it like it's not their fault, they didn't fuck up, or they're been clever and not investing in infrastructure that'll be \"obsolete\" soon. \n\nThis is just another attempt to shift the blame off their own colossal fuck up.", "342" ], [ "There were, Blue Whale is bigger. Biggest sharks max size is smaller than the blue whales average size. Biggest bony fish ever is smaller than that shark. Largest ocean reptile was a giant thing that looked superficially like a Dolphin where just this year they found a specimen of a species of this reptile that might be larger than the average Blue whale, but still smaller than the biggest blue whale.", "517" ], [ "There is a water purification method where the water gets purified by running it through a filter of activated carbon, and that's known as charcoal filtering, because the carbon readily absorbs basically everything indiscriminately. When someone asked can you just eat activated carbon to detox they said \"not really cause it'll absorb many things in your gut, good and bad\". Because of this, activated carbon mixes are used to treat poisonings and the like. So it's certainly \"safe\" to ingest.\n\nI believe Charcoal Icecream uses the same activated charcoal. Apparently adding it barely changed the flavour, only made it black so it's inventor added like coconut flavour n shit", "642" ], [ "I'm genuinely terrified of people like this who think something like rapture is just around the corner. Cause as the years go by and it never arrives they get more desperate, the idea that they don't get to be around to see all those they despise get their \"just reward\" for sinning, that western society is leaning more and more away from their beliefs. So they panic, snap and go postal.", "811" ], [ "I mean he's a little crazy\n\nLike sure the news programs can be full of propaganda and bias, but the websites? Those are intrinsically propaganda. You can't just go \"Youtube is a nazi propaganda style machine\". It's a website that hosts videos..where you literally get to choose what you watch. How is a website where I can literally spend the rest of my life watching clips of cute cats doing cute things anywhere near something that can be called akin to a nazi propaganda machine. Same with most social media, reddits, podscasts etc. \n\nLike it's a bit insane to think every piece of media is propaganda is it not?", "999" ], [ "...did you read the article or did you just ignore the parts that you didn't like. \n\nFirstly from the dude who's actually proposing using them, Prof.<PERSON>\n\n > \"I'm talking about using elephants as a machine or ecological tool to manage this grass,\" he said in an interview for the Guardian, **acknowledging that his proposal is radical and has major risks associated with it**\n\nThen from Dr.<PERSON>\n\n > \"Introducing elephants is a very extreme proposal that would have very significant social and environmental impacts\"\n\nThen from Mr <PERSON>, senior lecturer\n\n > \"...introducing elephants would pose significant problems.\"\n\n > \"If we did go down the road of introducing elephants to Australia, we had better develop the technology to clone saber-tooth tigers to eventually control the elephants,\" he said in a statement.\n\nHow can you post this article, say \"It has no downsides\" when the dude literally proposing to use them says it has major risks and that it is radical.", "431" ], [ "1: Nope\n\n2: It's a type of spell\n\n3: armour as multiple factors, that do include weight. However the key point here is he is wearing Havel's armour which has high *poise*. In the original Dark Souls, poise basically works in that the higher your poise, the more you resist knockback, to the point you can straight up ignore it. You'll still take the damage you would take, but your character isn't going to react to been hit, so the gankers couldn't stun lock him\n\n4: IIRC, no you can't change armour once summoned. \n\n5: As for the base question, the only disadvantages are they have a fixed spawning spot: Where their sign appeared, is where they will appear. This can lead to some trolling where the \"host\" summons a duellist then buggers off and hides. I have done so myself but never when I was summoning someone to duel, only when I got invaded.\nThe other disadvantage is the fact they can't heal, while the host can. This is for balance reasons to give the host the edge when getting invaded, but because the duelling mechanic is essentially voluntarily getting invaded it has the same balances.", "961" ], [ "For a real answer: There is no best set, the nature of how the game works means skill will always trump everything. However, there are some builds which are more forgiving to a players lack of skill. What they're wearing is a mixed <PERSON> set. <PERSON> is a rather badass character in the souls universe, wearing essentially stone armour. In Dark Souls, heavier armour have a statistic called \"poise\". What poise allows you to do is the more of it you have, the more you ignore knockback when getting hit. See when someone hits you with a sword when your naked, your character reacts how you would expect, they flinch. So if someones..casting a spell or whatever, you can \"interrupt\" them by hitting them with a strong enough hit to overcome their poise stat. Havels rock armour typically has very high poise, to the point you could wade through hails of arrow fire and spells and hits from the largest weapons and not flinch...still take damage..but not flinch. \n\nSo in the games there are always people who try to min-max for the optimal advantage and it ALWAYS involves wearing a piece of Havels armour. But there wil always be someone naked, wielding a broken spoon, who murders these people cause they're actually good at the game and don't need to rely on min-max to win.", "476" ], [ "Nah, any sensible invader knows there is a chance they'll end up in someone who is playing co-ops world. Some expect \"honour\" but fuck that. However if your summoning invaders yourself, then it's 100% ganking to do this. This is legit just wasting someones time for pathetic shits n giggles. \n\nThe best people to be summoned by for PVP as fight club organisers. THEN honour matters. #1 of Dark Souls Fight Clubs: Don't attack the host. If you do, every other summoned participant has permission to murder you.", "439" ], [ "Ofc that happens, but the fact is baring pvp bollocks, you can get good enough at this game, and any soulsborne game, to bypass min-max meta builds. If you think about souls players in some sorta pseudo-tier list, the flipping Havels are...like Class 3 players, where ones who play in whatever gear they want and win are Class 2, and the absolute insane bastards that murder everyone naked with a spoon are Class 1. \n\nA lot of class 3 players like to pretend they're class 2..but in a pinch they always go back to their min-max builds as a crutch to compensate for their lacking skills.", "163" ], [ "Well yes, but I don't try to tell newer players that, cause the real fun of the game is just playing with the weapons and gear you like, and getting good with them. Nothing quite sucks the fun out of game like been told to compete you gotta wear this specific set and use these specific weapons and spells.", "22" ], [ "No, so there’s 3 regions, Japan, Europe, North America. This region decide doesn’t really take into account the fact that Australia, New Zealand, the entire South Pacific and South East Asia exist. \n\nDue to how infrastructure is, these regions get terrible ping to American servers and it’s even worse trying for Europe. So they have to play on Japanese data centres to get reasonable ping. But within those data centers square never bothered to make a dedicated Non-Japanese speaking ones, so all the people who speak English or know more English than Japanese just collectively decided to play on Tonberry. I think early on it just started as where the Australians and New Zealanders played but eventually people from most of South East Asia (a lot of whom speak English) came along too~", "63" ], [ "No, cause it sets a precedent. The people will get used to it, a meta will develop where certain ships who magically gain massive forward firepower dominate. Then when CIG go to remove this placeholder, all these meta babies will raise hell and complain and we're either left with a large group of angry people claiming CIG ruined the \"meta\" by taking away their OP firepower or CIG caving and leaving it in and we're stuck with assholes with OP firepower that literally makes other ships pointless. And **yes this would happen even just in PTU and evocati**\n\nNone of this lone wolf crap, you bought a multi-crew ship. Deal with it.", "403" ], [ "Ahaha creative I'd love it as a side thing, tho not quite what I want. Like we have 3 Mega level mamemons atm, Prince, Bancho and Tonosama. None really work as an evolution for little cyborg bean here. I'd really just like poor metal here to get the same love Metal Tyranomon and Andromon got in getting a Mega that just builds about their cyborg traits", "300" ], [ "Well (if you know this forgive me) all the original \"Cyborg\" Digimon were prototypes used to make Machinedramon. Those been Metal Tyranomon, Andromon, Metal Mamemon, Metal Greymon (Virus), Megadramon and to a far lesser extent Boltmon (he wasn't used in Machinedramon).\n\nYou look at those 5 and they're all \"unfinished\", they're part cyborg but broken or flawed in some way. Then look at the ones who've recieved a special mega. They all go from been the proto-type parts for Machinedramon into complete mechanical monsters in their own right. Andromon - HiAndromon he becomes fully armoured and per his lore becomes self-aware instead of a mindless machine. Metal Greymon Virus can go into <PERSON> who is once again a \"complete\" cyborg. <PERSON> complete gets covered in metal by becoming <PERSON> you can't even see flesh on him anymore. \n\nSo I'd like to see something in the same vein of Metal Mamemon X there but you know not terrible and actually a mega (Metal Mamemon X is a Ultimate/Perfect). An \"upgraded\" Metal Mamemon. I drew a terrible paint drawing at an attempt at one but I didn't go well but just a cyborg Mamemon that's more \"complete\" and \"upgraded\" from Metal Mamemon. Maybe unlike Rust which went well...\"rusty\" and Hi Andromon which leaned more into Robo-cop style, they could go for a more \"cyber\" tech aesthetic, like the X version but better. Make his metal helmet a digital visor instead etc. Maybe laser claws or something. Make him more \"future techy\" to stand out among the other OG cyborgs megas.", "300" ], [ "Names one of the few things I haven't given thought. Weapons I thought about a lot. One idea I liked was a kind of combo cannon. So imagine its cannon right now. Make it 50% bigger and then split it in half and have one half on each arm, like attached for the forearm, like think of them like armguards but each one is half a cannon. \n\nNow as a homage to <PERSON> he has both his fists with electro claws or whatever and they're his primary attacking weapons. Then for a big attack if he clasps his hands together, the two halves of the cannon slide forward and form a big singular cannon. Like imagine say..how they put their hands together for some beam attacks in Dragon Ball Z, but instead of like energy in his hands, they get covered by these two halves of a particle cannon. This way he regains a hand, but still gets a upgrade to the cannon and claws. Then for his back I'd actually give him a jetpack. And then yeah just a really cool targeting visor. Maybe something like a <PERSON> display visor where instead of his face it shows cute little pixel emoji versions of a mamemon face.", "498" ], [ "Theres no good guy here yeah Google is been stubborn but the one pushing for them to pay for news is fucking <PERSON>. This isn't \"oh small time news been hurt cause Google ain't paying for it\" this is \"rich old fucker whose has actively undermined half the western worlds democracy wants more money\"", "99" ], [ "From BoTW Specifically I reckon <PERSON> would make the most exciting fighter. If we include Age of Calamity I'd want their take on Impa. \n\nBut as for overall franchise we need another villain so <PERSON> or <PERSON> get my vote. Tho a proper interpretation of <PERSON> is also high on my list, he's still too much a <PERSON> clone.", "456" ], [ "Nah its not like that, nor is it a lack of options, its just not ones I want. So I got 3 lines up there, one is Tunomon, Elecmon, Thundermon, Metal Mamemon and then I put Metal Mamemon X and I put a secondary mega slot with Machinedramon. My issue is I want a good Data type mega for Metal Mamemon, that is a \"Mamemon\" species cause Metal Mamemon is my actual favorite Digimon since the opening cutscene for Digimon World 1. Prince Mamemon doesn't work with <PERSON>, <PERSON> is...a Garurumon etc. All the options are either ugly or entirely different \"species\"\n\nThe other two lines are <PERSON> into <PERSON> into Flare Lizamon into Virtramon/Burning Greymon into <PERSON> with Ancient Greymon as a alternate mega and <PERSON> into <PERSON> into <PERSON> into <PERSON> into Lord Knightmon/Crusadermon with Lord Knightmon X as the alternate Mega. \n\nSo you see I got a trio, one ends up Virus, one ends up vaccine and so I want a nice Mega for my favorite Digimon. Lacking that I use it's X version as a substitute. Like he's part of the OG Cyborg digimon, yet he's gotten no love. <PERSON> got Hi-Andromon, Metal Tyranomon got Rust Tyranomon, Metal Greymon (Virus) got Blitz Greymon. Only Metal Mamemon and Megadramon don't have special dedicated cyborg megas designed for them : < \n\nAlso I really don't want <PERSON> and <PERSON> in my third line, I actually want <PERSON> into Gladimon...but <PERSON> has yet to have any of the baby digimon evolve into him lol. I also think Candlemon is trash but its only one that fits nicely there.", "300" ], [ "Because the events happening are not News Corps property. If <PERSON> shoots <PERSON> and News Corps reports on it, they don't magically hold the rights to the story of \"<PERSON> shot <PERSON>\". The content of the story is NOT THEIRS. All they give is the presentation. \n\nIf for example google, instead of just providing the summary just straight up wrote the story up themselves and put that up instead of hosting ANY news from news outlets, there would be no case. They're not \"stealing\" the news, you can't steal fucking news. \n\nIts a false belief to assume there is \"lost ad money\" here. It's the same belief by movie, music and game companies that piracy is a \"lost sale\". The false belief that if the pirates didn't have a way to pirate they would magically transform into a sale, when reality has shown they just choose not to gain access to the product. The majority of pirates are doing so out of convenience and opportunity. Not desire for the product in question. It's easier to just download and file than it is to go through the process of payment, installing apps, going to certain websites, etc. It's rarely a matter of money. As such if piracy avenues disappeared they wouldn't suddenly go \"oh well now I'll go through all that shit I avoided\". No they'll just determine the product isn't worth the personal effort. \n\nGoogle isn't some innocent company and have a lot of bullshit they do, but this is just Murdochs rags trying to double dip. Via google more traffic is directed to them than would otherwise, but they're not satisfied. It's the whole \"we don't want to just make money, we want to make ALL THE MONEY\". \n\nThere is no lost ad revenue here, the people who just read the summary in the search result were NEVER gonna go visit these news outlets by and large. The fact the news was there in a search result is the most effort they're willing to put into engaging with the news. If you take it away, they're not gonna magically go visit news corps trashy fucking websites. They'll just wait until they passively learn the news via other means like friends or whatever else just happens across their path. \n\nThe kicker is **News Corp knows this** which is why they're pushing for google to pay instead of for google to stop providing summaries in the results. They KNOW if you remove the summaries they won't magically result in more people visiting their websites. So they're trying to be cunning little fuckers and make undeserved money. They think by forcing google to pay, they can make money where they would make none cause once again by and large the people who only care enough to read a google summary aren't even gonna put the effort into actually going to a news site.", "99" ], [ "I mean why not? Also because \n\n1: It's a possible route thanks to one of the various card games out there\n\n2: Small(ish), wingless bipedal dragon made of fire evolving into large, bipedal dragon with wings made of pure fire is works great imo. Then having said bipedal dragon evolve further into quadrupedal dragon with wings made of fire keeps the theme going. \n\nI'm not the biggest fan of Agnimon nor overtly human digimon, with Flamon been the worst cause it's literally just <PERSON> from Frontier. I know this isn't a popular opinion but I've never like the concept of people fully becoming Digimon. Fusing okay, but stuff like Flamon and the ending of a certain Digimon game sit funny in my stomach.", "300" ], [ "I mean yes, but why add more shit into the storm. We're already gonna have childish backlash when we lose our \"magic bag of holding\" inventories, when death becomes a actual consequence, when we won't be able to use claim to magically teleport our entire fleet from once side of the universe to the other, when landing pads stop allow ship spawning and it'll be restricted to hangers only etc. \n\nWhy would they want to add \"people losing vast amounts of potential firepower they used to have\". Right now all they gotta deal with is \"people moaning about not having access to potential firepower\". You can easily ignore that. But giving them it then taking it away? That creates shit storms.", "795" ], [ "I mean I did say I think its the worst monster they've made for multiple games. Never get people like you who comment. Why the hell do you try to change peoples minds about what they like and dislike. Do you love <PERSON>? Is it your favorite monster ever and you can't **stand** the thought someone thinks its a ugly plucked turkey with allergies.\n\nHow about next time, just don't comment if after your perfectly reasonable question you're just gonna dismiss the damn answer. You asked what I would prefer. Why the hell did you ask what I prefer if you're just complain about the answer?", "342" ], [ "Bullshit, you weren't expecting and list and then slapped up qualifiers after the fact. There isn't some magical fucking criteria a monster has to meet to replace the stupid dinosaur. If it's a monster, and its of comparable strength, it could've been used instead. All that matters is if it poses approximately the same level of challenge. \n\nWhat type of monster it is, it's element, it's size, none of that is a bloody factor. All the devs did was go \"we need a monster for this point in the game\" and imo some braindead goon thought <PERSON> was a better choice over many others. And it's my opinion he was fucking wrong.\n\nI don't need to qualify my opinion, I don't need to justify, and it's not/can't be wrong cause it's a fking opinion. They chose a bad monster to put into Rise. End of story.", "254" ], [ "I doubt one monster matters that much. In MH4, early on I think only water monster you find is Kecha, which is probably why in 4U they squeezed Cephadrome in. Yet they had 3 monsters with fire element.\n\nHell in World I think Anja is the only fire element, because World didn't utilize many older monsters been the first game of the generation, but obviously element spread wasn't their biggest concern. In fact of the Gen 5 monsters introduced, I think only it and Bazel are the only non-elder dragon fire users. They clearly don't care to much about element diversity as long as one is there for every \"stage\" of the game. And they could've chosen any other over snot turkey.", "300" ], [ "I was also only noting early game. All the games clearly have \"stages\" where you go from the \"great-whatever\" to some tougher but still simple monsters like <PERSON>, or <PERSON> etc and then somewhere in the middle they throw the Raths at you and then its just monsters around raths strength but different mechanics until you hit the Flagship and move onto hard mode.", "283" ], [ "Why though? <PERSON> is literally the central protagonist, like yes the 3 of them are the protagonists, but <PERSON> was created out of nowhere (remember Blazing Blade is a prequel) so it wasn't just <PERSON> and <PERSON>, and for the plot of the first half of the main story the objective is to find <PERSON>'s father. \n\nHell the games name is \"Blazing Blade\" and <PERSON> is the one who wields the titular weapon.", "719" ], [ "I don't argue she isn't popular, but she's not the central protagonist of FE7, she's not even the secondary lead, or even the tertiary one in the main campaign (that role kinda falls to <PERSON>). After the prologue campaign she just kinda...tags along on <PERSON> and <PERSON>'s adventure. She doesn't even get one of the super weapons, instead they just kinda throw her a \"almost as legendary\" sword lol", "1011" ], [ "While I agree, there is a logic cause for these very outsider character requests, a lot of the \"push\" for them aren't from people who regularly play Smash. Like a shit ton of people pushing for <PERSON> BARELY play Smash, they just like the idea and prestige of <PERSON> getting in. Same with the Fortnite kiddies, the majority seem to barely play Smash, some don't even own it their friend owns it.\n\nBut they know getting into Smash = a big deal, so they gleefully push for it. So...fuck those types of people lol", "439" ], [ "Pirates didn't just attack people for shits and giggles. They raided ships for loot and profit. Majority of \"pirates\" you encounter think piracy is random PVP with no goal other than PVP.\n\nSo ofc the community is anti-pirate if most pirates just want to shoot for no gain other than \"dur hur I shot you without warning, aren't I skillful\" \n\nPeople will stop been \"anti-piracy\" the second the players who claim to be pirates...actually behave like pirates. Until then they're gonna get told to take a hike. Just cause the mechanics to loot peoples ships aren't all that fleshed out aren't here, doesn't mean you can substitute in \"random PVP\" as a placeholder.", "793" ], [ "Regardless of kids, the fact this is purposefully stated to be a SFW sub trumps all that. It's not only kids, there are adults here who don't want to see horny assholes with their junk flapping in the wind. There are literally dozens of porn subreddits where they encourage people like us to post pictures in nothing but our birthday suits, but the one sub where they say \"please be clothed\", idiots go \"oh they must just be pretending, here's me basically naked, come suck me off *wink*\" is stupid", "282" ], [ "But no ones posting \"I don't like <PERSON> and Mythra\". They're posting moronic essays on why sword fighters bad or anime bad or boobs bad. \n\nInstead of posting their subjective opinion, they're trying to justify said opinion, cause they know if they just post \"I personally dislike this character\" it would either be completely ignored or downvoted cause no one gives a fuck about personal opinions. \n\nSo instead they're like **GUYS, GUYS, I CAN SCIENTIFICALLY PROVE WHY ME DISLIKING THIS CHARACTER IS CORRECT!! PAY ATTENTION TO ME GUYS, HERE'S WHY THIS LIST OF PERFECTLY FINE CHARACTERS SHOULDN'T BE IN SMASH, ITS 100% OBJECTIVE FACT AND YOU'RE WRONG FOR LIKING/DEFENDING THE ADDITION OF THIS CHARACTER**", "709" ], [ "Randomly killing people is an entirely selfish act that only benefits the bored asshole who shot someone down for self-gratification and no-in game benefit, in fact its a net loss cause they expended fuel and ammo to kill that random person. \n\nSo an action for purely selfish personal amusement at the expense of others. Sounds like griefing to me.", "528" ], [ "Or here's an idea: Stop been a lazy coward and actually put some effort into getting your PVP fix. Go find people who actually want to do PVP. But no 99% of people like you are actually trash at it, you don't want PVP you want easy targets so you can pretend you're good at it, cause the people who actually do PVP are gonna be 1000 times better than trashy griefers who can't be bother or are too uncoordinated to get good at the game\n\nThat or you're assholes who need the gratification of knowing they pissed someone else off. You need that sad hit of \"ahaha they're mad\", and that makes you a griefer who needs to bugger off and learn to be good at games.", "411" ], [ "No, they gotta stop trying to dress up their actual dumbass reasons. 99% of the people who are bitching about characters by going \"sword fighters\" are in reality just mad their personal choice didn't get in. \n\nBut if they went \"I wanted [Insert random ass character not even on a Nintendo system] or [Insert random ass character from super obscure title] instead of <PERSON>\" they get ignored.\n\nSo they dress it up, pretend they're not mad cause their own selfish desire wasn't fulfilled, no its a \"mechanical fault\" or a \"design flaw\" to add this character.\n\nSo what I want is people to stop trying to dress up their sad little selfish reasons why they didn't like the newest character, and just outright state their sad little selfish reasons. Instead of trying to fucking \"legitimize\" their complaint to somehow try to paint it as a objective fault instead of a subjective one. Barely anyone is actually mad at these characters cause of the weapon or art style. They're just mad their own personal wet dream pick isn't in the game and they delude themselves into thinking the slot was \"stolen\", and they try to justify why.", "342" ], [ "I mean if we're been fair that's cause japan lost the war and had tons of rules placed on them. They still don't have a standing army, navy or air force as per Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution. Even with their government umm...\"deciding\" to \"reinterpret\" it back in 2014, they never had the capacity to interfere with other countries like the big powerful post war nations did.", "655" ], [ "Yes. Hell its also valid to just attack them with the intent to cripple the ship to just take their goods. That is piracy. Your end goal is profit. The only time the end goal is not profit is if your attacking a bounty hunter preemptively etc, like protecting your territory. But even that action ultimately comes back to profit, kill law enforcement types so you can continue to rob people.\n\nWhat the smooth brains arguing in other replies want to pretend is “piracy” is flying around, jumping people in prospectors or caterpillars and blowing them up without a fight cause they find it funny/it’s the only pvp they can possibly win. Then they try to justify it as “it’s dangerous to mine alone, I’m been the danger!”\n\nThey’re all lying through their teeth and just want their e-peen to feel big by blowing people up for shits and giggles.\n\nThe irony is they actively hurt people trying to play as actual pirates cause actual pirates can’t go and rob those prospectors or caterpillars cause they’re all exploded", "793" ], [ "There was this one girl in a series called Fairy Tail, where her power was quite simple she could shrink or grow anything. Herself, other people, objects. But like she had fine control over it, she could change individual parts of those objects. At one point a character was dying of a tumor, she shrunk JUST the tumor to microscopic size, to the point it was harmless. \n\nI always thought that was an amazingly clever way of using a power that sounds so basic, “I can change things sizes”", "708" ], [ "I think the key point is they are currently the exception. The majority are just exploding people, and they're doing it for shits and giggles and out of boredum. \n\nOnce piracy is a *reasonably* fleshed out gameplay loop, more people will do that. Then said people **need** to call out mindless griefers otherwise they'll continue to be lumped in with them. Take a hard community stance on it, like their orgs will not accept or even hunt down \"pirates\" who go on profitless killing sprees", "411" ], [ "Lol fair enough. But to put some context, if you were to look up any major gaming groups (be that communities, journals, youtube groups etc) \"Top 10 greatest villains in gaming of all time\" <PERSON> is ALWAYS on that list. Might not be #1 but he's always there. Where as with Crash much as I love him only is gonna appear of \"Best Platformers\" lists because he's very much a product of the 90's obsession with 3D platformers. \n\nOnly reason you didn't hear about <PERSON> in regards to Smash demand is cause he was literally written off as \"impossible\" cause of how...rubbish Clouds appearence was (aka no Eng VA, 2 songs only, no spirits etc)\n\nSo everyone assumed \"Fuck Square Enix won't even let us have more than 2 songs from FF7, why the hell would they give us Sephiroth\"", "1011" ], [ "I mean yes, unlike previous admin you don’t just remove things until you have a replacement ready. Not saying that will replace these policies, but it was clearly not one of their priorities when campaigning. With regards to the border they only said they’ll stop the ridiculous wall, and that children of immigrants who were born here thingy that <PERSON> lot scrapped", "799" ], [ "Yeah well your gonna be paying premium for it, we don’t have the land to just keep making more and more farms just to satisfy global meat demand. The other species on the planet shouldn’t be forced to got extinct just because <PERSON> is picky about whether his steak use to shit in a field or not. \n\n“Real meat” will and should end up a luxury good so that we can cut down on farms", "166" ], [ "Okay you clearly have no fucking idea what your on about. Every Link has their oven distinct personality. Just cause he’s mute doesn’t = no personality. You’d know this if you played any of his games. \n\nFire Emblems main selling point is the characters and their personalities. They’re not faceless units, they’re characters with backstories which is why you don’t want them to die in battle.\n\n<PERSON> didn’t have a personality no, but Subspace Emissary gave him one. <PERSON> as we have him is essentially a Smash Brothers original character. \n\n“<PERSON>” is a default fucking skin. A skin that gets replaced instantly by 99% of players. People don’t love Minecraft cause of fucking <PERSON>. People don’t give a shit about <PERSON>, unless it’s in this specific context of “sTeVe FoR sMaSh”. \n\n3rd party representation is destroying it if all they go for are the characters the most people meme about it or the characters whose owners lobby Nintendo the hardest for a “collaboration”", "1011" ], [ "Your point on 1 is just wrong. The “Villagers” in Animal Crossing games have personalities. They react to things, express emotion, do shit. <PERSON> is a emotionless brick man cause he’s a default texture. G & W is a combination of multiple characters across an entire series of early portable consoles, and each one of those characters express more personality in their designs than a default texture. R.O.B gained a personality via subspace emissary. He’s essentially a Smash Bros original character. As there isn’t a story mode in Ultimate like that, the default texture we just had announced won’t get the luxury of developing a personality. \n\nSecond point is my point. Nintendo is getting too involved with what they want in Smash. They were more hand off earlier titles and that’s why we got more than 1 ACTUALLY obscure character per game. Your examples aren’t obscure, just cause <PERSON> isn’t big in ‘MURICA doesn’t magically make him obscure, same with Hero. Those franchises are big and still relevant today. Same with Belmont’s, Castlevania is still a relevant franchise, even if it’s owner is controversial. When I’m talking bout niche I’m talking about <PERSON> from Golden Sun (or any rep from that game) or how people want Geno. Using Golden Sunada an example, it was the best selling non-Mario, Zelda or Pokémon RPG on the GBA. It’s not relevant now days, but it’s a classic piece of Nintendo’s gaming library. Chance of characters from games like that are almost nill since Smash 4 cause Nintendo’s marketing department decided to get more involved and push more marketable character. They should piss off and go back to leaving it to <PERSON> and the team. \n\n\nFinally fuck little <PERSON>. It’s not Nintendo’s problem his mum raised him on a fucking iPad with limited access to decent games outside Minecraft.", "1011" ], [ "Bitch I care about Minecraft more than half the kiddies excited for it. I was playing it when it was neckbeard notch one man coding it and doing regular builds and I still play it to this day.\n\nI’m just not letting something as fucking stupid as “but it’s popular” cloud my viewpoint. Smash is primarily a Nintendo nostalgia fighter, that’s what it got big as. \n\nSorry half the people who play it grew up as halo dude bros playing Xbox as kids and only care about Nintendo cause of Smash, their nostalgia can go get fucked. Get Microsoft to go make their own character fighter with their own iconic characters instead of robbing slots from well deserving Nintendo characters who didn’t break the bank but are still classics in their own right. \n\nAlso your clearly blind if you think <PERSON> had no personality before wind waker =_=", "767" ], [ "I called it, got downvoted for it, but playing <PERSON> he's 100% going to pull a Banjo and practically vanish from online within a month or two except for the rare person maining him. He's got all the hallmarks of a character that just won't stick.\n\nHe's not got an easy mode people can **reliably** cheese to get wins, you actually gotta put a little effort into getting his weird playstyle to work and that just spells doom for popularity after the 'omg new character' hype dies down.", "410" ], [ "They've all been marketable in some way. Not specifically to North Americans, but every one feels less like \"left of field characters\" like we used to get such as Ice Climbers or Pit or Wii Fit Trainer or hell originally <PERSON> or Marth when they debuted, and more like \"Nintendo's marketing department sees this as a sound move to push DLC\". \n\n<PERSON>: Persona is huge now\n\n<PERSON>: Dragon Quest is huge literally everywhere but America\n\n<PERSON>: Honestly I think he came in a package deal with <PERSON>\n\n<PERSON>: Huge in Japan, South America, parts of europe. \n\n<PERSON>: Promoting their own game\n\n<PERSON>: Probably hold over from when planning Ultimate initially/promoting own game\n\nPoor characters like Phoenix, or other requested characters/series with proper history with Nintendo like <PERSON> or Geno etc will probably not get in as DLC, cause marketing wants what would sell DLC. They're doomed to either nothing, or next SMash game maybe in as base roster cause we got more of long time requests in Ultimates base roster than DLC has given us. <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> etc all in one fell swoop.", "1011" ], [ "<PERSON> is the type of man, he wouldn't say no to any suggested character unless it was actually impossible. He's not gonna lie and go \"oh no thats not possible\" just to keep a character he maybe doesn't prefer out. \n\nMarketing goes \"we think this character would do well, can you do it yes or no\" and he says \"yes\" cause he's an insane man who can do anything. They don't go \"can you please add <PERSON>\", or \"how about Minecraft thats a good idea\". They go \"we **want** <PERSON> in, can you make it happen\"\n\nAs for <PERSON>, you perhaps overestimate the series popularity.", "1007" ], [ "Yeah but its not wrong either. Look at all the hit games of the last few years. Nothing sticks around. \n\nWhat (generally) sells is either well established franchises with long histories that are carried by the weight of their own names, or flash in the pan hits that get replaced next \"season\" with the next big thing. It's a sign of the big gaming companies trying to shift from offering products to \"services\"", "387" ], [ "How old do you think I am lol, I'm same generation as you. We didn't \"grow up\" playing Minecraft. I'm talking about people who were genuine actual kids, not teenagers, who didn't touch minecraft until it was 1.0 in 2012. \n\nThey are far and away the largest demographic its fanbase, and as such are who <PERSON> was added for. They didn't add <PERSON> for the people who played minecraft in alpha and beta, they added him to appeal to the literal horde of people who ACTUALLY grew up with it, and are currently late teens around now.", "100" ], [ "Oh rubbish, no one likes Minecraft for <PERSON>. Steve is a default skin no one gives 2 shits about. Hell even when they made a game based on Minecraft with a story, they STILL didn’t use fucking <PERSON>. \n\nMinecraft is iconic (purely cause it’s popular), <PERSON> isn’t. The literal only saving grace for this fighter is the zombie and enderman skins", "1011" ], [ "Rubbish, complete rubbish you’re just trying to justify the unjustifiable. A fucking Minecraft Pig would’ve been a better representative cause at least it DOES something in the game. A creeper, a villager/illager. There are dozens of entities in Minecraft that would represent it better than a LIFELESS, SOULESS default skin.\n\nIf I go up to any kid they don’t go “I love Minecraft, <PERSON> is my favorite character”. No they’ll talk about the house they built or how a creeper surprised them or how they have a spiderman skin.", "887" ], [ "No it's not. Its basic fucking fact. The only reason <PERSON> is in, is cause Nintendo marketing wants that sweet money, and Microsoft/Mojang have apparently spent the last 5 years lobbying Nintendo for it to happen. \n\nMeanwhile characters who did better than Minecraft on the (also stupid) Ballot languish as assist trophies or even worse spirits. \n\nThose characters deserve it more than Minecraft, who only has \"It's popular\" going for it.", "372" ], [ "But they're not \"main cast\". They in the story, but I'm talking the group of characters you would call the \"main characters\" of the story. \n\nClass stories, side quests etc aren't \"main\" which is the point of my post. The race is mostly regulated to everything BUT been the main cast. And no diss to <PERSON>, but grand company leaders aren't \"main cast\", they're people who give the main cast stuff to do.", "660" ], [ "What does <PERSON> do outside Crystal Tower series? Almost literally nothing save for some alchemist quest stuff which isn't main story. Main cast is people who routinely show up in the MSQ and have it virtually revolve around their exploits, like the <PERSON>.\n\n<PERSON> is a supporting cast member, same with <PERSON>. <PERSON> don't show up in every scene no, but the events of every MSQ involve at least ONE of them in some regard. <PERSON> is the main cast member of the ironworks, <PERSON> and <PERSON> are the sidekicks who occasionally have a side quest related to them. \n\nSorry these side characters are ones you love, but they're not main cast members.", "719" ], [ "Plus ya know, sales wise it was the best selling original IP on the system. It's #21 on the GBA best selling list, which sounds low, except that 4 of those 20 are Pokemon, 8 are Mario universe games, 2 Zeldas and a Kirby. The rest are collections (Pac-Man collection, Namco-collection), Finding Nemo shovelware and a Yu-Gi-Oh! game. \n\nThen you look at the titles Golden Sun beat: Metroid Fusion, Final Fantasy Tactics Advanced, Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories, F-Zero, another <PERSON> game. This is just in the list of games that sold more than a million. Golden Sun: The Lost Age is also on this list. \n\nGBA had dozens of amazing games that didn't sell a million, yet here is a brand new IP beating out Final Fantasy, Kingdom Hearts and Metroid.", "369" ], [ "<PERSON>, or any Golden Sun rep. The Game Boy Advanced is the 2nd best selling portable console of all time, beaten only by the Nintendo DS. It's Nintendo's 4th best selling consolse, after the DS, original Gameboy/Colour and Wii. \n\nAnd Golden Sun was the best selling original IP on that system. Brand new RPG that punched way above its weight class and beat out Kingdom Hearts and Metroid and Final Fantasy. \n\nThat series did more for Nintendo and achieved more than half the characters on the roster, and its a travesty it gets relegated to assist trophy while echo fighters and yet another Pokemon rep get in the base roster, and while random third parties get DLC priority.", "767" ], [ "There is nothing wrong with them not wanting to expand their company. Why should GameFreak forcibly expand out of a studio size they're comfortable been just cause they by pure chance lucked upon the most profitable franchise ever. \n\nThe entire reason \"The Pokemon Company\" was created was so that GameFreak wouldn't have to expand into some big AAA level studio/media company to manage Pokemon. The guys who founded and still work at GameFreak wanted it to stay their small studio. To do half the shit people think Pokemon \"should have\" they would either have to double their studio size or fire most of their staff and replace them with people trained in entirely different game design to what GameFreak specialises in.", "161" ], [ "BoTW would be a horrible way to do Pokemon. People make dumb screens like this without actually thinking about the gameplay. This would play NOTHING like Pokemon games.\n\nThis would be an entirely different game from a Pokemon game, and if you think \"I want Pokemon to become an entirely different game\" then news flash: You've gotten over Pokemon as a game series. \n\nDon't go bitching for the series to change off what it is to suit your tastes", "935" ], [ "I mean, not German but \"Mortis\" or \"Mort\" is one of the few words I believe German took from Latin, and it's also one of the most commonly borrowed Latin words, used in such words as, Mortality, Mortuary. So \"Mortipot\" translates pretty well in meaning to English speakers I'd think.\n\nTo me I sounds a lot more badass than the terribly (good) tea pun we got.", "157" ], [ "But they don't want to hire more, they don't want to expand. They probably would've happily made Pokemon forever with an infinite roster if they could've stayed making it in 2D/2.5 sprites, but every Gen people whine and whinge they want them to reinvent the fking wheel, because people want Pokemon to change to suit their tastes rather than accept maybe they've gotten over the most basic RPG on the market.\n\nAlso they don't sit on a pile of cash, they got 4 way control over all the cash between them, their publish Nintendo, their psuedo-partially owned, psuedo-parent company TPC and Creatures Inc. It's not like they got a vault full of billions they sit on like <PERSON>.", "161" ], [ "No..not at all. You can be dumb and bias against Game Freak all you want but they made Pokemon. It's not a situation like Star Wars in Disney's hands or Spiderman in Sony's. \n\nYa'll just mad Gamefreak is doing what they want with THEIR FRANCHISE, and not what YOU WANT. Half of you want the game to transform into something entirely else cause you like the idea of Pokemon, but don't like it been a entry level RPG. \n\nThe egos on this sub.", "935" ], [ "But your not enjoying Pokemon games, you and the people like you constantly whinge about Pokemon games. You hate what makes Pokemon games Pokemon games, you hate when they change, you hate when they get rid of the change, you hate when they don't change. \n\nI don't hate people who \"enjoy Pokemon\", I hate on people clearly having no fucking idea what they want, flip flopping on every little thing and actively LOOKING FOR SHIT to complain about. \n\nComments like this\n\n > or give up the Pokemon license to someone who gives a damn and might actually care enough to include the full roster and optimize the game at all and let it run at 60fps\n\nAre the same trash lines of thought you saw in the pre-Disney era of Star Wars, \"fans\" who think the creator of something no longer deserves **their creation**.\n\nJust cause the game isn't going the way YOU or others want, you assume GameFreak is doing something wrong or don't appreciate the series. You have less than a fucking drop of information on how GameFreak develops these games, on their internal mindset and culture, yet trash ass **armchair developers** sit on their bloated asses been cynical twits on the internet assuming THEY KNOW THE TRUE PATH, THEY CAN CLEARLY SEE WHAT GAMEFREAK IS DOING WRONG, just like a mordibly obese football fan sitting in their easy chair calling the coach a twat and presuming if they were coach the team would be the best in the world.\n\n\"Oh but but..other studios..\" SHUT UP, WHO GIVES A FUCK. Other Studios don't have Pokemon, other studios have a different development culture. Other studios have different pedigrees, experience and company structure. \"ooh look at what BoTW did for Zelda\". BoTW was underdevelopment for the ENTIRE LIFESPAN of the Wii U, and is made by a internal development house of Nintendo, who have direct access to OTHER INTERNAL DEV STUDIOS. Even then they had to pull in Monolift Soft, a studio who EXPERTISE IS IN OPEN WORLD RPG's, to help make it. GameFreak is only published under Nintendo. GameFreak isn't owned even partially by them. They DON'T have access to those resources freely. \n\nSword and Shield is looking fantastic, it looks like a modern game, only people WILFULLY IGNORING all the improvements over the 3DS games come to the conclusion it doesn't look better or an improvement. You have to ACTIVELY nitpick and tunnel vision on the odd reused animation or low res texture to even come up with a handful of \"faults\". \n\n90% of people like you have an argument that can be condensed down into \"GameFreak isn't making THEIR GAME how I WANT IT, and if they DON'T SHAPE UP, I want it given to someone WHO WILL\".", "342" ], [ "It would not be, people thought Star Wars would be better off outside of <PERSON>'s hands and all we got was pandering fanservice so far. Listening to the consumer on design decisions is stupid. Consumers have jack shit idea about how to design a game. \n\nYou can listen to feedback about whether they had fun, what they liked, what they didn't. But the stupidest thing any developer can do is listen to loser armchair developers who think they know better. \n\nWishing someone loses the thing they created just cause you dislike how they're treating it is just egotistical and selfish. You can get mad about the direction and not buy the games, but wishing they had their creation taken from them is just psychotic entitlement.", "342" ], [ "Wow it's almost like those games you listed are by companies with decades more experience making 3D games with psuedo to complete open worlds, where as GameFreak has literally made...3 games total in 3D (yes 3, it's just straight up disingenuous to pretend different versions are different games. They made Gen 6, Gen 7 and Let's Go).\n\nIt's childish to go \"Look at this 3D game by companies with DECADES of experience making 3D games\" and complain the company with maybe 6 years experience isn't on their level. \n\nGrow the fuck up seriously.", "161" ], [ "The worst mistakes ever made by multitudes of games is decideding to let the consumer base dictate the direction and design of their games. Armchair developers are morons, who know nothing of game design. They aren't out of touch they're been fucking LOGICAL. They are building up their skills and designs over time. Ya'll think with all their money they can just skip to AAA level developer with decades of experience in 3D open world games or some shit.\n\nThey've made what...three (four technically) 3D games...EVER. Gen 6 games, Gen 7 games and Let's Go. \n\nYa'll wanted them to go from making basic pixel art games to reinventing the fucking wheel in less than 6 year. Your childish impatience and delusions about how making games work seem to think GameFreaks making zero progress or not listening yadda yadda whinge whinge. \n\nLook at what they've done, they went from their comfort zone of pixel games, to XY logically going from isometric pixel art RPG, to chibi isometric 2.5 overworld with 3D battles, to non-chibi 3D overworld with a forced perspective with SM/USUM, to this were they're moving to pseudo-open world. At a fucking blinding pace compared to 90% of over developers. \n\nYa'll childishly think if you throw enough money at shit anythings possible, but get mad GameFreak doing shit their own pace.\n\nDon't you dare think they're not listening to fans, if they weren't they would still back making Pokemon in 2D sprite style quite happily. Just cause your mad about the dex situation, and refuse to accept their reasons cause a bunch of armchair devs said \"nah that's not good enough\", such arrogance to believe cause they're not backflipping on demand = out of touch and not listening to fans.", "161" ], [ "> We are within our right to say that it was bad and could’ve been done better by someone else\n\nOh yeah you are, but that doesn't mean you are CORRECT. Most often history has shown that, no you were wrong. What's been shown by this noisy ass minorty on the internet over Pokemon isn't customers been critical of the product, it's a bunch of whiney manchildren getting mad cause they're not getting their way.", "342" ], [ "Tbf, if we look at the fighters, King of Fighters is like the..4th wheel. The top two are Street Fighter and Tekken, then Mortal Kombat and then i'd rank KoF. Then after that we get into the popular, yet niche fighters like Killer Instinct, Soul Calibur and Guilty Gear, and spin-offs/ties in like the \"X Franchise VS Y Franchise\" games.\n\nKoF is fun, great and a excellent fighter...but didn't stand out compared to the big 3.", "368" ], [ "You site warframe but one of their major reasons for going the circular route wasn't just consoles, it allows them to do the spiral gimmick where the inventory can in theory infinitely cycle inward.\n\nAdditionally, circle method allows for clear display of infomation in the center, as opposed to having a list of items on one side and a block of information on the other.\n\nIt's a bit..biased to just assume circular grids are JUST for console comfort.", "89" ], [ "It would still look stupid. \"Just slap some SFX on it\" it's a exploity fking no-clip camera mode. Go play Minecraft in creative mode if you want your ships to move around like that. I don't care how far in the future it is, your several hundred ton hunk of iron wouldn't be able to counteract gravity with pissy little forward thrusters. \n\nThe whole point of VTOL is they're meant to have a definite advantage over non-VTOL in atmosphere. Your stupid giant ship without VTOL should be impossible to control in atmosphere if you aim it's nose down.", "136" ], [ "No it's more...they got the same moveset roughly. But they're different enough it's not just a skin. Like for example, <PERSON> is a clone/echo of <PERSON>. Now <PERSON> has stuff like if you hit with the tip of his sword he does bonus damage. <PERSON> doesn't get this but her sword does more damage than <PERSON> would if it wasn't hitting with the tip. \n\nThey're \"imperfect\" clones is the best way to put it. Essentially the same, but different enough to not just be a skin.", "887" ], [ "Nah just watching people actually playing and having fun. Everything else was trailers so far, or semi-scripted. This was 4 people playing two rounds of smash, heck even <PERSON> joked that it's kinda dangerous cause you get caught up in the game and forget your livestreaming. \n\nPlus the whole Nintendo Direct just felt more fun. Just game after game, with only two little interludes by <PERSON>, then the big Smash bit.", "14" ], [ "I think that's the localisation teams fault. They did a horrible job. When they couldn't think of an interesting replacement for a Japanese phrase that doesn't translate well, they just put \"....\". I can't remember his know but there's that guy who was really into a particular food. In Japanese he just casually enjoyed them. The localisation team decided his entire personality was going to revolve around around his love of this food.\n\nThe story is actually written fine, the localisation team were absolutely shit.", "709" ], [ "He is/was the leader of the Space Pirates, which are big enough organisation the galatic government has entire military wings dedicated to fighting them.\n\nLike...the metroid universes aliens are all very odd looking. So despite looking like a Space Dragon...he's actually a sentient, sapient, cunning ruthless warlord...who is also a space dragon", "521" ], [ "It's definately a fighting game, but if put onto a scale of \"accessible/casual\" to \"wtf how do you play this/mega hardcore\" it's probably near the casual end. Like I use Smash as a example when trying to describe other games in other genres.\n\nLike...Heroes of the Storm is the Smash Brothers of MOBA's. It's still a MOBA, but it's skill floor isn't hard to get onto, and the ceiling is still high enough for competitive play, but not as high as say DOTA 2. Same with Smash. It's easy to get into, and high level play is fantastic, but it's easier to reach high level in Smash than say Guilty Gear or Street Fighter.", "22" ], [ "It's kinda of like...there is this race, who're very aggressive and breed like rabits and likes to steal technology. These are the space pirates. <PERSON> is ..unknown. The guy who betrayed the Chozo (bird people who adopted <PERSON>) and <PERSON> claimed he \"corrected <PERSON>'s \"genetic flaws\"\" with the Chozo's advanced tech. However he was this big dragon before that. \n\nAll we can speculate is, there is an aggressive species simply dubbed space pirates, which take over worlds for their tech and kill or enslave the inhabitants. At some point <PERSON>, a fire/laser breathing space dragon joined them, climbed the ranks and became leader.", "1022" ], [ "Well only 6 of them aren't Nintendo properties, 3 of which are Capcoms. Still more than Marvel \"hey it's crossover...with our own properties...in the same universe\". \n\nWeird despite be the co-creators, there is only 1 Namco Bandai property in the game with Pac-Man. You'd think they'd have more in a game they're literally helping make. You'd think at least a Tekken, Soulcalibur, Tales, Katamari. Heck even Tamagotchi (I'd say Digimon but I doubt Nintendo would allow that). But nope, appart from items and assist trophys, the combined heritage of Bandai and Namco is represented by Pac-Man", "161" ], [ "This image always confuses me. Oblivion was an issue cause it was a SINGLE PLAYER game. If someone released a single player game and expected me to pay for a single outfit I'd get just as pissed. New cosmetic options in a big DLC pack with actual new gameplay? Thats fine. But \"Pay X amount for one piece of clothing only you will see\". Fk that. \n\nHowever an online game (usually free) that has server upkeep? I'm fine with it.", "838" ], [ "New Vegas was boring. I enjoyed 1 and 2, and I enjoyed 3 much more than NV. NV is enjoyed by people who have a hate boner for 3 (obviously not all people who enjoy it for this reason, but I find the ones who are toxic about how it's the best are like this). The pacing on NV was snails pace, the map was a whole lot of nothing in between the odd interestingly designed area. \n\nFor it's flaws as an RPG, at least The Commonwealth was an interesting area, the pacing of the various quests decent.", "148" ], [ "This reminds me, there is a well known and respected New Zealand Kendo Sensei, white as you can get. Goes and watches the footy when he's back home, loves a cold beer just your typical Caucasian New Zealander (least I think he's Caucasian, just...100% he's not Japanese). \n\nIn addition to his renown as a Kendo practitioner, in Japan he is a semi-famous author who teaches Japanese Philosophy, to Japanese people at university. Yet I remember someone basically doing the same thing as this post in regards to him.\n\nI don't get how it's shocking to people like the <PERSON> poster, that taking time to learn something that is skill based, like kendo, this flute, or the studying of Japanese philosophy, isn't considered a BAD thing by the culture in question. \n\nLike what mental gymnastics do you have to perform to associate \"this person dedicated a significant portion of their life to learning this thing, ensuring it can be shared with more people and keeping it alive\" is ever a bad thing??", "943" ], [ "It also makes them a bitch to wash\n\nSource: Does <PERSON>, decided to splurge and buy some nice quality hakama and gi once I saved up enough. Too afraid to wash them again despite been told how too.\n\nNow I just buy the cheaper synthetic fabric ones that I can just chuck in the washing machine. I do a martial art, I'm not preparing to go into battle with the shoguns enemies, don't need my clothing to be flame resistant or antibacterial.", "229" ], [ "Well V is a set character kinda like the main protag of Fallout 4...well that's a bit too harsh...more like <PERSON> from Mass Effect? Cause they're voiced, there is a hard limit to exactly how unique a character can be if it has voice dialogue.\n\nIt's not New Vegas where you get given essentially a blank slate", "1021" ], [ "> Why show the fucking trailer as third person\n\nBecause it's not a gameplay trailer, also it's not shown third person, it's not shown any person cause the camera isn't locked to one person\n\n > There's literally no reason to customize your characters looks or clothes if you never see it\n\nHmm, you mean when there is a cutscene, of a dialogue conversation, or when your driving your character turns invisible?/s\n\n > I really, really hope they add a fully functioning third person view. \n\nWhy? If your only point about it is \"what's the point of customization then\" that's a weak fking point. This isn't a big flat fantasy setting. Your in a highly urbanised setting. Lots of interiors, tight alley ways etc. They want to do it justice. 3rd person would require designing the cities to be like Mass Effect where you have like 5m tall ceilings, and big flat empty spaces between objects so the camera always has clear line of sight. \n\nIt's not gonna be sci-fi witcher, get over it.", "659" ], [ "Australia is very expensive to import to. Idc if it becomes GoTY no game is worth the import price ahaha. \n\nWhile yes we could make a foreign GOG account, I would still like for CDPR to provide an official channel to acquire the game. Because an official route means no negative repercussions possible for circumventing something like Steams VPN rules etc. Even if that \"official\" way is, as I noted, been cheeky buggers, making a censored version then releasing a free patch that undoes it completely. \n\nAdditionally because our nation is so technophobic and heavily weighed down by lobbies, recently we've had taxes put on digital goods so it's more \"fair\" for brick n mortar stores. Cause you know, lowering prices to compete isn't an option oh no. Gotta make it so expensive to try and sell here they have to raise their prices. \n\nSo foreign digital goods are more expensive now, where once they were our one escape from \"Eh you guys have high wages, pay double for everything compared to the rest of the world\"", "793" ], [ "Fk the table\n\nBasically, R18+ has the following restrictions\n\nViolence: Can't be realistic or explicit\n\nSex: No Restricitons\n\nLanguage: No Restrictions\n\nDrugs: May not be an incentive or a reward. May not be detailed and realistic\n\nNudity: \"Permitted\" whatever that fucking means\n\nThemes: No Restrictions\n\nStupidest part is\n\nMA15+\n\nDrugs: May not be an incentive or a reward.\n\nThat's it. That's all the 15+ rating says. The 18+ rating has an extra caveat in the text", "442" ], [ "Fallout 3 was indeed banned, because it didn't meet MA 15+ ratings due to the original game possessing morphine as one of the drugs. They changed it to med-x and decided to universally name it that.\n\nDrug use in GTA doesn't get banned because your not rewarded with drugs , nor is there incentive to use them via gameplay. They're fine with them showing drug use, ans sales and what not. Not fine with you getting given..cocaine as a mission reward, and you manually been able to take it. \n\nJust cause you dislike a topic, doesn't make it useless.", "1021" ], [ "I make this post not in fear of not getting the game, it's in annoyance to get my hands on it I'll probably have to get some version that is edited from the actual product. Witcher 2, they had to make it so the \"offending mission\" where you get offered sex as a reward **automatically** selects the \"decline\" option. \n\n3 Australian states sex work is LEGAL and regulated, while the rest independent sex work is legal, brothels aren't and prostitution is unregulated. That's how ridiculous the CAB is. Our country is perfectly okay for someone to pay someone to have sex with them....but finds someone in a mature adult game doing so wrong.", "544" ], [ "The sex bit is actually stupid. Back when we didn't have R18+ and Witcher 2 came out it got banned because one mission you got offered sex as a reward for a quest. The censored version automatically made <PERSON> decline. \n\nOur country has legal and regulated brothels and sex work in 3 states, with the rest having at least legal independent sex work (so no brothels but your fine pimping yourself out in your house). But the game review board at the time decided a fake man in a fake fantasy setting accepting fake sex isn't okay.", "632" ], [ "It's not creating outrage or panic. Your misinterpreting this post as an attack against Cyberpunk and CDPR. Regardless of the game, the rating situation in my country is ridiculous. \n\nWe're not a religious majority country or any other type of country where censorship of mature themes are expected. It's just the whims of a bunch of old foagies who don't understand technology. \n\nCalm down, understand this post is negative towards the **AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT** and not the game. Sorry your precious front page has a post that isn't a video or clip or art of the game. But boo hoo to you, this is a topic a lot of people care about cause Australia has a lot of gamers, CDPR pay attention to this subreddit, my country has a bad history when rating \"mature\" games. \n\nThe only faux outrage happening is yours towards this post. No one is panicking, bringing something to peoples attention doesn't = panic.", "995" ], [ "I honestly think it's a situation of \"depends on who's on that games review committee\" because for years now Fallout's been getting through due to the drugs been fake and not having realistic names, yet Saints Row 4 got banned for side mission where the drugs were fake and not realistic. \n\nBut ultimately they need to go \"okay your adults, it's a fking game, unless it's paedophile simulator 2018 it's fine\", instead of treating the medium as \"for kids\". A medium doesn't get given a R18+ rating bracket if it's just for kids.", "1021" ], [ "No, just old people. Though...our right wing party is slowly starting to resemble an American political party. Never in my (comparatively short) life did we used to get religion pushed from a political standpoint. But then our last PM did stuff like..remove the rule in the school chaplain program that stipulated they had to be secular. Cause apparently having the schools counsellor be christian is better than you know just counselling. \n\nSo tldr: Our political landscape is full of elderly gentlemen. However I fear for the future cause all the right wing younger politicians are getting mentored overseas and coming back with insane American right wing ideologies.", "886" ], [ "This is true, but I would LIKE to give the developers money for their hard work. Hence posting this on a reddit the developers read, hoping we don't get a Hotline Miami 2 situation where they just throw their hands up and go \"sorry fellas, we've had to IP block ya buying it\". \n\nThis game is looking amazing and I would rather if the worst arises there be a way to actually buy it rather than be literally forced to pirate it.", "793" ], [ "> Not a lick of Christian influence in the UK government\n\nI feel like in both our governments, it's there they just don't show it cause it'll make it harder to push their agenda. We got 40 to 50+ year olds running our countries. Back when they were in school, church was a part of the day to day, my old man (he grew up in NZ) owned a hymn book, every school kid did. \n\nWe both have \"older\" populations who the politicians are pandering too. Then we both have media outlets that like to look at modern stuff like games and use it as scapegoat for their scare pieces, so that the 40+ year old mom n pops watch it and go \"oh dear these are bad\". \n\nBut hey least your don't live in a state that decided your not allowed to purchase alcohol from shops past 10pm, and pubs must close by midnight. Nothing says major metorpolitan night life like nothing been open at midnight on a Friday", "579" ], [ "I think we just find it odd you're typing trailing off. Like multiple ellipsis in the middle of a sentence eg \"I think we just find it....odd your trailing off\" is okay cause it conveys the idea you had to pause and think. But ENDING stuff with .... is very odd\n\nPlus it is very annoying.....\n\nWhen they type like this.....\n\nEnglish class and books taught us this represents a pause. A single one represents termination of the sentence, multiple indicate there is more to say", "251" ], [ "They’re gonna be playable. They’re already working with a fairly limited roster cause the story is canon so they can’t draw on dozens of characters from past games. Also it would be weird if they invent to many straight up brand new characters (like the egg-bot) that have zero references in BoTW. \n\nWarriors games need a large playable cast, so they’ll be drawing from every possible source. Watch when really odd characters you wouldn’t think of become playable, like <PERSON>, or hell <PERSON>. Maybe we get <PERSON>’s teacher too cause they can’t have <PERSON> himself.", "254" ], [ "Yeah I got the trick down, its just it some times falls apart cause someones dumb or someones on auto-pilot cause they're only in this dungeon cause roulette and treat it like speed clear.\n\nI'm not one of those \"look how tough I am\" tanks (its always a gunbreaker) you see in roulettes who flex by pulling every enemy from the start of a dungeon to the first boss. \n\nAs a newer player who started with DPS, those kinda players didn't impress me, and it made my first time in those dungeons just not as fun. I wanted to play normally, not attack a messy blob of monsters just cause the roulette tank is only here for the reward and has better shit to do. \n\nSo when I started tanking I decided to not be slow, but be \"normal\". Sensible pulls, nothing to overburden the caster, nothing that would just be me flexing, etc", "427" ], [ "I like having a minion per job.\n\nIts not interactive, but I love Cherry Bomb with my phoenix themed Summoner. \n\nFor my Blue Mage for some reason i love Fledgling Dodo. \n\nFor my FF12 Judge Magister themed Dragoon I'm still looking for that perfect minion.\n\nMy warrior I'm trying to base on an anime character, who is essentially a anime'd to hell spelunker so atm she runs with a wind up goblin cause it fits the aesthetics.", "300" ], [ "Thankyou! Yeah when I was looking through other glamours for inspiration, most \"fire\" themed ones are one of two things; Ifrit themed \"demon\" look or \"desert/arabian\" themed.\n\nI wanted just raw...'fire', or more akin to a summoner who would match Phoenix. Someone did show me [this persons glam] which did inspire me partially~ Tho they're much better at taking screenshots ahaha", "887" ], [ "I'm so happy you think its badass. I'm only a trial account user, so my \"endgame\" as it were is end of Heavensward (haven't even started it yet), so glamour wise I always feel like I'm working with half the tools everyone else gets access to. \n\nThen cause i'm new, when research I find something cool, only to learn it was limited event, like for example I'm trying to make a Dragoon Set based on FFXII Judge Magisters, and [This persons Dragoon](_URL_0_) had a really nice chest plate. Alas it's from a Garo cross-over event, which ended with patch 5.1 I believe. \n\nBut I'm trying my best :D", "599" ], [ "I recommend, even if you suck, to do the PVP Frontline roulette and get the 1000 wolf marks you get from it. The PVP sets are all quite nice looking (except summoner/scholars ARR sets they're umm....well \"quirky\" is the polite way to call them) which is were I got this coat (its a Stormblood one, despite not having access to those expansions, I do get the PVP gear released for them).\n\nAll the ARR and HW sets are actual sets with stats, while from Stormblood onwards they're literally just glamour items, no stats, equipable from level 1 etc. \n\nLike Frontline you don't even really have to be good, i'm not I just blindly run around with the team in a big ball and try to kill people lol. At the end of the match I'm still getting 1000 marks, and even most expensive armor/weapon is just 2000.", "668" ], [ "The problem with systems where its not legally required, like the US, is unscrupulous political parties then do everything they can to try and make it inconvenient for certain sectors of the public to vote.\n\nIt been illegal to not vote in Australia, the amount of backlash they would get if they tried to pull that shit would be apocalyptic cause it would essentially be a political party forcing the public to break the law and face fines. \n\nWhile looked at in a vacuum it seems like its \"not as free\" a system, but in reality it serves as a weighty balance against a type of voting corruption. No party can make it harder to people in one area to vote, or for a certain demographic to vote, cause literally everyone is required to vote. \n\nIn turn they actually have to work harder to impress more people.", "845" ], [ "I mean from the video: he is stiff and emotionless. Like I'm probably a bigger fan of minecraft than half the people who actually wanted him in seeing as I was part of the people playing the first playable versions, but even as a big minecraft fan...<PERSON> just isn't a \"character\"\n\nThey added a default skin to a character fighter so..yeah he's meh to me.", "887" ], [ "<PERSON> still got a personality. Especially with the design they based him on. Look people can be excited, I've been excited for the last 6. But its still a waste of a spot in my eyes, when there are literally dozens of ACUTAL characters people have been asking for, for much longer, sitting in the lurch.\n\nEver since that damn fan poll for Smash 4, its gone from \"Man Smash adds really obscure fighters from Nintendo's history like Ice Climbers or Pit or Mr Game and Watch\" to \"We're adding the A: Something from one of Nintendo's new IP's or B: Lowest common denominator big franchise represenative\"\n\nWe'll never get some of the more requested characters like <PERSON> or <PERSON> or whatever cause now all that matters is \"MiNeCrAfT's MoRe PoPulaR, sO iT DeSeRvEs iT MoRe\" or replace Minecraft with {insert modern game with sales in the millions cause thats the standard for today} cause fuck older games that did well for their time right?\n\nWatch it'll be fucking default skin from Fortnite next. Then default skin from Among Us or some shit", "1011" ], [ "<PERSON> is special cause he was one of the first video game characters. All minecraft has going for it is \"it's popular\". I love it, as I've noted I have played it from when it was just Notch 1 man band coding it with weekly updates. But its not anywhere near as special as \"one of the first gaming characters ever\" \n\nIs it such a bad thing to want in this Nintendo game for Nintendo characters, even if they're from games that are small success wise, to get priority over third parties. Like how Smash was before the stupid fucking fan ballot that shifted the entire communities mindset from \"oooh I wonder who we'll get next\" to \"WE WANT THIS ONE, SPAM <PERSON>, SPAM <PERSON>, SPAM THE DEVELOPER/OWNER OF THE CHARACTER SO THEY GO SPAM NINTENDO AND <PERSON>\"", "719" ], [ "No <PERSON> doesn't have more personality than Fortnite, they have about the same: None. As for Piranha Plant, there has been so many various over the decades, in same games it legitimately is a character.\n\nAs for your question I already answered that: I'd have something from Minecraft with an actual personality. A Creeper, one of the boss mobs, a <PERSON>, a fucking pig. Something that we interact with and has the vaguest semblance of a personality. \"Steve\" is a first person camera viewpoint with a skin.\n\nThat been said, I would've preferred no more third parties for the 2nd pass, considering how heavy the first one was with them.", "456" ], [ "Okay fuck the downvotes but its gotta be said: The issue isn't pandering to \"new nostalgia\", its they're pandering to nostalgia outside of Nintendo. They got all these great new and old IP's and some really of the good old nintendo style creative stuff, but then marketing goes \"yeah but this game that is literally the definition of \"popular with the lowest common denominator\" would sell more DLC\", and in turn all the cool Nintendo stuff gets shafted.\n\nI've supported minecraft since the first playable versions and I still think they've got piles of requested characters from before Minecraft even existed that should get priority over it. But nope, defensive people go \"but its more pOpUlAr\" like whats choosing whats the most popular is how Smash's roster became as cool as it is.", "767" ], [ "But there is nothing special about it except \"popular\". Smash really shouldn't be sinking to that low, if \"popular\" is the deciding metric say goodbye to ever getting whacky shit like your main bot ROB there or Ice Climbers. \n\nFortnite didn't even define the bloody genre its in, PUBG did, all Fortnite did was be \"slightly better, more kid friendly PUBG, with a gimmick\". That is NOT a claim to fame.", "372" ], [ "No, Battle Royales were popular before Fortnite cause PUBG. Fortnite shifted from the actual game it was developed as to battle royale solely because of how insanely successful PUBG got over night. \n\nLike it didn't do anywhere near what Minecraft did. Minecraft took a very niche, small genre and made it explode. Fortnite took a big genre that was probably going to be short lived \"flash in the pan\" fad, and unlike PUBG it didn't die.", "372" ], [ "There are dozens they've barely touched just cause they're not \"current\". Half the most requested pile is Nintendo franchises. But people think \"uhh they're running out\" just cause they're not NEW franchises or one of the ever green titles. \n\nLet alone characters from already represented franchises. Like Legend of Zelda is probably one of the most celebrated franchises in all of gaming history and they got: <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> who re all soft clones of each other. <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON> who is still a soft clone of <PERSON>. Its a franchise with 19 going on 20 mainline titles, and a multitude of spin offs, with multiple reoccurring characters and they've only managed to use THREE. Two of them are represented twice or more. \n\nSo no they're not even close to \"running out\". They're just pushing for \"marketable\" and it causes smaller Nintendo IP's, older Nintendo IP's, or ones already with fighters but loads of untapped options to get shafted.", "952" ], [ "It gets pushed as a \"kids pick\" when in comparison to other popular requests. A lot of younger people aren't asking for <PERSON> or <PERSON> etc cause they didn't play them. \n\nSo even if the people asking for those mentioned characters also wanted Minecraft or played it as it was been developed, the vast majority of those asking for it would be \"younger\" people for whom Minecraft is probably the \"oldest\" title they're requesting for. Where as for the long time Smash players who've been requesting shit since before Minecraft even existed, its a \"newer\" pick.", "719" ], [ "Since when is \"best sales\" or \"popular\" the metric by which characters deserve to be in Smash. Better delete half the roster then, like ness, game and watch, marth, etc cause their personal games didn't even break a million sales. From now on only block busters cause thats apparently an important metric", "387" ], [ "I mean you kinda got the gist of it. For young people remember something that is relatively recent in the grand scheme of their life, it’s just “remembering something fondly”\n\nNostalgia is an emotion for a specific time or place. It doesn’t even require specifically remembering what, as with the case for significantly older people, it’s like an emotional echo. \n\nConsidering you can still go play Minecraft, and it’s age it’s not really in the realms of nostalgia territory yet. Especially for the younger fans who played it post release which was only 8 years ago.", "147" ], [ "Sonic is a special case and you know it, and that specialness doesn't extend to Minecraft. Nintendo and Sega had the rivalry to end all rivalries. There were advertisements of them calling each other crap, \"Genesis does what Nintendon't\". All before my time but even I can acknowledge there hasn't been a gaming company rivalry of that level ever since, no matter what \"Xbox vs Sony\" dude bros think, neither company literally went for each others throats. \n\nSince Segas console business died they ended up maintaining that rivalry on friendly terms (and cause it sells) with the Olympic games crossovers and ofc Sonic in Smash Brothers. \n\nMinecraft/Mojang/Microsoft never had that kinda relationship with Nintendo, so it doesn't get that \"special case\" excuse. <PERSON> is here cause Minecraft will sell DLC. It is entirely a marketing decision rather than a \"this is special to Nintendo/<PERSON>\" decision.", "161" ], [ "SMT started on the NES? Digital Devil Story: Megami Tensei started on the Famicom aka NES in 1987.\n\nDigital Devil Story: Megami Tensei II was on the NES\n\nThe enhanced port of Digital Devil Story: Megami Tensei II was on the SNES\n\nShin Megami Tensei debuted on the SNES. The franchise didn't jump off Nintendo till 2002. \n\nLook you need to understand during the NES, SNES era, Nintendo had 90% market share. Most long lasting iconic game franchises started on the NES/SNES. Some jumped ships later (Final Fantasy) or created spin offs for Nintendo's competitors (Persona for Playstation), but even then these companies still had games on Nintendo (Crystal Chronicles series for Nintendo for example). \n\nMinecraft was a PC (and Mobile) focused game that only started going to various consoles once Microsoft bought Mojang.", "767" ], [ "I could tell you way more obscure things about Minecraft than you ever could muster. I was playing the damn game <PERSON> was working on before he started Minecraft (Wurm Online, very janky, very \"hardcore\" survival game, not made of blocks). \n\nThe fact remains Minecraft isn't \"special\" to Nintendo. It didn't get big on Nintendo, it didn't start on Nintendo, Nintendo didn't contribute to its success nor did Minecraft help \"create\" Nintendo like many of those \"80's and 90's\" games your handwaving. \n\nIt's here cause Microsoft and Mojang lobbied to get it into the game for 5 years, and cause its \"popular\" Nintendo's marketing team asked <PERSON> to put it in cause it's easy money. Like he said before DLC 1 even dropped Joker, Nintendo decided who gets in DLC, all he did was say \"yes I can do it\" or \"no I can't do it\". Hell I wouldn't be surprised if its in as part of a deal to also get Banjo in. Banjo was one of those fighters requested for longer than Minecraft existed, since back in melee, even Smash 64. Like with the other 3rd parties Nintendo nd <PERSON> had to approach the people who owned these IP's. So over 5 years they probably came to an agreement of \"We'll let you have Banjo if you also put in Minecraft\" or something like that.", "767" ], [ "<PERSON>, but that's why I'm saying this is entirely a \"marketing\" inclusion, rather than \"who \"fits\" best into the game\" inclusion. It's a cynical viewpoint, one I believe is accurate, but at end of day that's all it is, a viewpoint. \n\nThere been characters that deserve to be in the game more, doesn't change the fact the character we are getting is this one. But there is nothing bad about lamenting the lost potential, nor is there anything bad bout calling out why it is that.", "1011" ], [ "The only reason its disappointing to people like me, is by letting in characters with very little relevance to Nintendo, it lowers the likelihood of long time requested characters getting in. \n\nUsing lets say <PERSON>, not a personal choice but a popular one, as an example. Before, he \"competed\" with other highly requested characters (So <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> etc), characters from new Nintendo releases (Latest Pokemon, Fire Emblem, Mario, the rare new IP's from Nintendo), and \"classic\" 3rd party titles heavily associated with Nintendo (Dragon Quest, Street Fighter, Mega Man etc).\n\nNow that pool of \"competition\" is even further watered down with \"Random third parties that just happen to be very \"popular\"\". It's a double whammy cause this happened likely due to lobbying on Microsofts part, its now also competing against \"3rd parties who actively want their IP's in Smash\" where as before it was generally accepted Nintendo approached third parties and made a request.\n\nNow with <PERSON>, whats to stop Epic, or any other big major company going \"We want some of the Smash pie\" and going to Nintendo with requests rather than Nintendo seeking out characters. Its gone from \"The whims of Sakurai\" to sounding like \"If a company throws enough money at Nintendo, they can get into Smash\"\n\nIt's the threat of Smash turning into generic crap full of whatever \"hit\" character is at the top of gaming at that point.", "767" ], [ "Personally I want a Golden Sun rep. Not necessarily <PERSON> cause he's stuck in assist trophy hell, but just a rep. Golden Sun was the best original IP RPG on the Game Boy Advanced (Aka only got out performed by <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON>). It's got probably one of the best gaming soundtracks of all time, and its gameplay for an RPG was very unique. It's also an IP that desperately needs that \"Fire Emblem\" style revival. \n\nThe first two games (which are technically 1 big game) are probably the best pair of games ever put out by Camelot who nowdays are doomed to only making Mario Tennis. \n\nOther than them, I'd rather see some of the series we already have get more characters. Someone other than <PERSON>, <PERSON> or <PERSON> from LoZ, a third <PERSON> character, another <PERSON> character, someone from Xenoblade series outside of the first Chronicles game, preferably Xenoblade X. \n\nAs for a Final Fantasy rep, honestly it would probably end up been someone from FF6. 6, 7 and 9 are the three that always compete for the \"best final fantasy ever\" title, and while it usually defaults to 7 for how big it was at the time, all 3 are masterworks of RPG's. 6 been the last big \"sprite based\" final fantasy and last mainline title on Nintendo till the mobile version of 15 (+ updated ports of 10 (2) and 12, and virtual console releases of 7, 8, 9) mark it as a stand out of the Nintendo era of Final Fantasy. \n\nThe problem with Final Fantasy 1 is its kinda been reinvented a lot, so its hard to choose how to represent it.", "369" ], [ "From prior comments, many assist trophies arise from concepting fighters and then going \"who do we have time for\". It's a similar situation to how we got a <PERSON> costume, <PERSON> just didn't have time from Xenoblade Chronicles 2 release to Smash release to make him anything more than that. \n\nEach new Smash they gotta go redo all the existing fighters, and so a lot of the \"high tier\" assit trophies, the ones who are basically fighters we just can't control are the results of \"they didn't win the \"who gets to be a fighter\" race\"", "254" ], [ "No your misunderstanding my point. Cause Smash fans wanted <PERSON>, Microsoft held him \"hostage\" for lack of a better word, saying they want more of the Smash pie than just <PERSON> getting in. Then in negotiations they offered up one of their fattest cash cows, Minecraft.\n\nI can almost bet on at some point during this 5 year discussion the idea of him just been a Assist Trophy/Mii Costume was probably touted and Microsoft probably said \"nope not good enough\"\n\nCause the 3rd parties get royalties from these deals, and if Microsoft went to the table with JUST Banjo, a literally dead, near worthless IP, Nintendo had all the bargaining power and would probably offer peanuts. But Microsoft package deals Banjo with Minecraft one of thier most valuable IP's, and suddenly its not so one sided. Nintendo can't have Banjo without Minecraft, and Microsoft has far more negotiation power over royalties when Minecraft is part of the discussion.", "161" ], [ "I disagree with this take, consider the fact that outside the kids, everyone else is..gone or transformed into someone else. Yeah sure <PERSON> gets a fake mom, <PERSON>'s brother can walk etc. But what about everyone else who isn't the main characters?\n\nThat's a major motivation of <PERSON>'s to set the world right. Everyone but them is suffering under <PERSON>'s childish rule. Why should the entire rest of the town be forced to live in this fantasy land just so 4 kids can pretend their problems don't exist anymore.", "1007" ], [ "Been a very long time since I played but I believe so yeah. Like the only people who think \"keep the world how Mewt wants it\" is a good outcome are people with inherently childish viewpoints. \n\nYeah the bullies are dicks and deserve some karma, but they don't deserve to exist as zombies who would probably be killed by some adventurers sooner or later. \n\nLike \"world ruled by bullied 12-14 year old\" is not a good world.", "874" ], [ "New one they just couldn't be arsed creating and trademarking a new IP so they just recycled one they had ala SW: Battlefront style. \n\nWhile financially it makes sense, it does mean \"Prey\" now belongs to this new game and sadly the fans of the old one will never get the \"Prey 2\" they hoped for.", "896" ], [ "Why do assholes like you always come out when someone says they liked an old game from a series that got..well I won't say rebooted...recycled? Does them liking it somehow offend you? Are you worried <PERSON> will read this post and go \"You know he's right\", magically delete Prey 2017 and make the one you don't want?\n\nLike for real, the only person who needs to \"get over it\" is you.", "342" ], [ "The only issue I have is...the 2017 game is a fantastic Bioshock in space but like...could they have not been lazy. I get the Prey IP was just sitting in limbo but like let the game stand completely on it's own feet. Didn't need to recycle an old IP's branding, and that's what it is, recycling not rebooting. A reboot is what they did to Tomb Raider. This is them going \"well we still own the rights to the Prey IP, lets just call this Prey\"", "161" ], [ "No, a reboot is what happened with Tomb Raider. This is a entirely new IP in no way related to old Prey. That is not what a reboot is. Reboots maintain some semblance to what they're rebooting. \n\nThe point of a reboot is to take an existing franchise and freshen it up. The new God of War could be considered a reboot. But it's still God of War, the new Tomb Raiders are still Tomb Raider. 2017 Prey isn't anything like old Prey except genre, aka \"SPACE\" and \"FPS\"", "239" ], [ "I mean, I still think a company who's CEO more or less said \"It's a bit extreme to consider water a human right\". Even after clarifying his statement it came across as a bit crooked still, basically saying \"It should only be a human right to access the bare minimum amount of water they need\". Aka you should only get free access up to the amount you need to not die, then pay people for extra to you know..clean yourself and your belongings, etc. \n\nNo matter the crap EA's pulled it's not quite that...insane.", "161" ], [ "Going to have to say Mass Effect. The story is fine but I don't know. I played an unhealthy amount KoTOR yet Mass Effect just didn't stick. It just wasn't a universe I could connect with on the same level that I connected to the Old Republic universe. Same with Dragon Age. I guess I just didn't like Biowares original IP as much as everyone else did. \n\nIf they weren't so hyped up by everyone I don't think I would be as disappointed but they're legendary series and well they just didn't click. \n\nKoTOR 2 on release was a massive bummer too. Fuck that opening mission, so dull. Then you end up on Telos and holy crap what a boring design for the first planet.", "150" ], [ "But you see it is a big deal. The whole appeal of Battlefront isn't set piece Star Wars battles. It was you got to be a soldier on the frontlines. It was \"Star Wars\" battlefield. It was a Star Wars combined arms game. \n\nDICE's Battlefront is not a proper combined arms. It's a FPS with vehicles as temporary \"power ups\" or as weird map gimmicks. The only difference between their first attempt and second was they went from the vehicles been literal power-ups you find on the map to basically a kill-streak bonus.", "22" ], [ "I honestly wouldn't know. \n\nI'd probably like to try and create a \"better\" Pokemon GO. Instead of using phones, make a dedicated console for it. Like try to actually make Pokemon as real as possible. Invest loads into a AI-Team to make it so the Pokemon can be voice commanded. No longer turn based battle but just like the show. Eg. Instead of a random % chance a attack will miss, if you yell \"dodge\" and your Pokemon is fast enough and able too it will dodge. For this to work you'd have to \"see\" the Pokemon so probably go with some sort of \"google glass\" style console but you know...not shit. As we go through successive versions have that AI-Team working hard until we get it to the Pokemon learn how you would expect them too. \n\nI know people get spooked by AI, but I reckon if they're designed with a identity built in it would work.\n\nMore realistically I'd have the Pokemon placed more sensibly in habitats they would actually live in. If you only ever hang around in your city, well though luck your not going to find a Ponyta there, go out to the farmside to find one of those. \n\nEven if I couldn't get the rather advanced AI idea working I'd at least incorporate actual Pokemon battles into the game. You come across another trainer, you can challenge them directly to battle. \n\nYou lose, well you pay out in game money. Have to go find a Pokemon Center. If games successful enough, literally have them around just like the few in Japan. They would be a shop/cafe and you go there and heal your team. Failing that, have shops or venues volunteer to pretend to be the centers. \n\nOnce again depending of the success I'm not sure how I would do gyms.", "935" ], [ "Dunno if this is elitist, but if your at a party and need to get blind drunk or do drugs to have fun...go home cause clearly your at shit party.\n\nLike I'm not sorry, but if you need to at any time chemically alter how your brain is functioning to have an enjoyable time, you seriously need to reevaluate why the fk your in that situation. \n\nObviously those with mental health conditions who chemically alter how their brain is function are exempt from my looking down upon the practice cause they're using the drugs to get to \"normal\"\n\nBut if your 100% healthy and so fking bored you decided to get stoned...go get a hobby, go do literally anything else. <PERSON> off I don't care. There is NO reason for you to get high as a means to alleviate boredom other than your too lazy to try something else.", "615" ], [ "Hmm Australia's essentially got the same system however, names are different, and less breaking up of schools\n\nNursery = Pre-School\n\nReception = Kindergarten\n\nYears 1-6 called Primary School (Kindergarten is usually part of the same school). Always done at 1 school. You go Primary School, then High School.\n\nYears 7-12 High School. You can drop out in grade 10 if you have no intention of doing tertiary education. Graducating at Grade 10 gets you a School Certificate which will usually get you into a trade school or just general blue collar job. Graduating Grade 12 gets you your Higher School Cert, which you need for University.", "154" ], [ "Well if you mind something, it means it \"matters\" to you. \"Mind you manners\" is a common idiom. Generally if you \"mind\" something it is something that bothers you. So say you offer someone a drink and they go \"ohh I wouldn't mind a cup of tea\" basically means tea is something that wouldn't bother them to have right then. \n\nTrust me, I'm Australian, \"I wouldn't mind that\" is nothing compared to the linguistic gymnastics required to understand that \"yeah nah\" means no, and \"nah yeah\" means yes", "458" ], [ "It's not just to sway the parliament. She can literally dismiss it. However you guys have acts making that very hard. HOWEVER those acts don't apply to the rest of the commonwealth. Here in Australia the Queen (or usually her representative, the Governor General) can fire the Prime Minister and dissolve Parliament...which they have actually done once. Government had a shutdown similar to the recent US one. General fired the PM, appointed a replacement who passed the bill, then dissolved Parliament and forced a round of elections. If the General refuses to do so, she can just simply just fire him/her. Ofc this would cause massive backlash as we are a sovereign nation, but we are a sovereign constitutional monarchy. Thus, we have a Queen. The \"Queen of Australia\". It just so happens our Queen lives in England..and is also the Queen of England...and Canada. All separately.", "236" ], [ "In very simple terms, on a western bed you have the matress (with optional protector), the fitted sheet, (option to some) another sheet your cover yourself with, then the final thing on top.\n\nIn English this is called a Duvet, Australians tend to call it a Doona. It's a big thick blanket that usually has a cover on it like a pillow. \n\nOther western cultures use a quilt which doesn't get this \"pillow case cover\"", "295" ], [ "I'm rather shy and never was proactive about organising outings and such, I usually just got invited out but rarely I would. One year after spending another rather depressing new years with my high school friends I just didn't bother contacting them. For like..8 years not a single text from them, message, invite out. \n\nLike fk man it already wasn't the best hanging out with them, but not a single one bothered contacting me for nearly a decade. Then suddenly 3 of them try to add me on Facebook. Like fuck off, I get I didn't contact you either by choice but Christ I've had the same phone number for the 8 years, same email same everything. \n\nWhy the hell would I want to reconnect with you, I found better friends. Sure it's sad I can't say \"i'm still friends with people from my childhood\" but fuck it least they contact me occasionally.", "204" ], [ "Unlikely to get it. Cause as a student I wouldn't really know what counts as the top Aussie universities. I just know the universitites stereotypes, like how USYD is full of pretentious gits who think they're the best despite USYD performing no better than the other main universities, or how UNSW is know for somehow been far away from everything within a city.", "688" ], [ "It might be like this game mechanics wise, however creatures as large as them would not share territory even if they eat different diets. It's also based of past games ecology information from in game notes and such. The Barroth is like most monsters territorial, however it's primary territory, that been muddy bogs, hasn't really had a contender that could rival it. \n\nFor building ecological reports, you sometimes have to think outside the terms of how the game presents itself, because even the game is sometimes inaccurate due to limitations. A good example is something like Dalamadur from 4th gen. It's apparently 44039.7cm long, but no way the 3DS could realistically show that.", "829" ], [ "Oh I've got lists and lists of them, I'll give a few favourites.\n\nMy favourite dumb one is \"A weapon to surpass Metal Gear\" aka Team Snake. It's a team made entirely of snake Pokemon. \n\nTeam: Onix (suicide lead with SR), M-Steelix, Zygarde 50%, Arbok, Milotic and Serperior. It's astonishingly powerful as a team\n\nThen I had the royal guard. Basically Pokemon Theme around been various styles of \"knights\": Golurk, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, M-Gallade. I made an alternative team that's a bit more balanced by having <PERSON> as the \"King\" and <PERSON> as the \"Knight Princess\" cause you know in <PERSON> is \"<PERSON>\", replacing <PERSON> and <PERSON>. \n\nTeam AUSTRALIA (Updated thanks to Gen 7): <PERSON> (Kangaroo obvious), <PERSON> (Emu), <PERSON> (Frill-Neck), <PERSON> (Koala), <PERSON> (Crocodile).\n\nLast slot I change around a lot: Dragalgae (Leafy-Sea Dragon) Sharpedo (Sharks), Ariados/Galvantula (Spiders), Serviper or Serperior (Snakes, Aus doesn't get hooded cobras so no Arbok), Corsola (Great Barrier Reef). You could add Toxapex (Which is based on the starfish eating the Reef). But as an Australia the first 5 are for more representative of iconic \"Australian\" creatures. Everywhere has snakes and spiders and sharks. \n\nLast ones a bit loose and you gotta use your imagination a bit, it's a kind of...Steampunk/Studio Ghibli style airship themed team.\n\nGolurk (Nicknamed Laputa), Magearna, Klinklang, Dhelmise, Torkoal (Could replace with Volcanion for the \"Steam\"), <PERSON> (cause it's got the little scarf that any good airship captain would have)\n\nBeen working on a \"haunted forest\" style team cause we now got 4 grass/ghosts but we need more Pokemon. Currently thinking, <PERSON>, Trevenant, Gourgeist, <PERSON> (witch of the forest). No Dhelmise cause of it's aquatic nature. Maybe Shiftry cause it's a Tengu and Honchkrow at this stage.", "300" ], [ "I'd say our politicians who were educated and nurtured at foreign institutions (such as our former Prime Minster studying in the UK and having a very..Tories mindset ingrained into his political beliefs) coming back and trying to take away what makes our quality of life so better because they believe we should be \"more like the UK\" or \"more like the USA\". That is having from what appears to be on the outside a massive GDP, yet having mass internal issues such as healthcare, pollution, education issues.\n\nI honestly believe the \"Americanisation\" of Australia is probably the biggest ongoing pressing issue, as our political parties are influence by the lobbying groups of large international corporations who benefit from American style governments more than Australian style ones", "365" ], [ "Not at all, heck I'd be fine with the Battlefront IP sitting in limbo forever. I'd much prefer they look at the 2005 game and go \"lets make a modern version of this\" which no..the DICE versions are not that. I don't approve of using existing franchises as a sort of artificial \"booster\" shot to help improve a new IP's chances.\n\nFirstly cause perhaps it brings with it certain expectations that make the new IP seem lesser (Aka the old \"this a good game, but it's not a good [Insert franchise] game\"). DICE Battlefronts are okay FPS shooters...they're mediocre \"Battlefronts\", heck they're mediocre \"Battlefields\".\n\nSecondly because it \"destroys\" the original franchise, which is just wrong. Doesn't matter how small or large the fanbase is, the fans of 2005 Battlefronts are now NEVER going to get the Battlefront 3 they hoped for. Because \"Battlefront\" now belongs to this new IP. At least when it's in limbo they can hope someday someone looks at it and goes \"lets make a new modern version of actual Battlefront\". \n\nThirdly it just shows they don't have absolute confidence in their new IP, it it's basically a cynical attempt to boost a new IP's sale numbers. Sometimes their lack of confidence is unfounded. Let me use the case of the new \"Prey\". \"Prey\" was good enough it didn't need to be called Prey. They could've made some original name for it, and hey it would've done just fine, didn't need to basically finalise the original Prey's complete death.\n\nHowever many times their lack of confidence shows like...DICE Battlefront for example. The ONLY reason they used the Battlefront IP for their Star Wars FPS, is for nostalgia bucks. The old battlefronts had and still have a well established, loyal fanbase, and the games had a fantastic reputation. They made a new Star Wars IP that is generally only related to the franchise it's stealing the name from in genre (loosely, as I said old Battlefront is a actual combined arms game ala Battlefield. DICE Battlefront is more like COD FPS with power ups) and setting (Star Wars obviously). Both games (ignoring lootbox drama) got big backlash and lost mass amounts of players just on the merit of them not having any sticking power...yet those old as games from 2005 that do not hold up to modern standards STILL have loyal player bases. \n\nInstead of making their own \"Star Wars FPS\" and slapping another established franchises name on it, they could have taken that franchise, looked at what made it \"special\" and then modernised it. Reducing vehicles to power ups/kill streaks isn't that. Having tiny, enclosed set piece maps...is not \"modernising\" it. Modernising is bringing gun-play feel up to modern standards, adding NEW FEATURES that expand on the old ones instead of removing old ones. I could go on for paragraphs more so I'll TL;DR for you\n\nNo I don't want carbon copy of a 2005 game, I want the next **ITERATIVE** game in a franchise that last got a game in 2005...not a lazy new IP in a different sub-genre using the same name and having a cynical handful of throwbacks to the original franchise (like 3rd person view) in the blind hope it would appease long time fans.", "896" ], [ "I genuinely think \"VR\" pods would be a good business. We see people trying to develop these weird clunky VR treadmills and accessories for the home. Someone could take the VR googles, and then build little private booths/pods designed to actually physically immerse you. Way more accessible and sensible than having a fking treadmill and a dozen other pieces of plastic tat in your living room", "11" ], [ "I had always assumed she was just \"The Queen\". But apparently her titles of \"Queen of England\" and \"Queen of Australia\", \"Queen of Canada\" are all separate titles, due to them all been constitutional monarchies. So dozens of countries all just happen to have the same person as their specific Queen, rather than those countries pledging loyalty to the \"Queen of England\". If someone invaded and took over England I don't know made it a Republic, she would still be Queen of Australia etc, as ruling England no longer has an effect on who's the \"queen\" of these monarchies.", "773" ], [ "The implications of such tech would take a very long time actually trickle down into the gaming industry. We're not talking about just some random piece of tech, this would be classed as medical research. \n\nIt would take a fair amount of time for the tech to be deemed \"safe\" in the first place, then take an even longer time for the tech itself to become \"open source\" as it were. \n\nWhatever giant medical/pharmaceutical company develops a safe brain-computer interface tech isn't going to like Sony or Microsoft take it to make video games without some insanely hefty licencing fees, if at all.", "161" ], [ "...What. Are you like...a kid?\n\nA lag-less brain to computer interface has way more applications than gaming. Medically the most important feature is it will allow quadriplegic people the ability to control prosthetic limbs. Imagine someone in a situation like the late Professor <PERSON>. Fk video games, it would be far better to learn how to let someone like that WALK and MOVE than using it to make a game. If I was in his poisition and they said \"we can give you the ability to move around and use your arms again, but we would have to replace them with bionic ones\" I would say yes a thousand times over.\n\nYour literally basing your assumptions on Sword Art Online where it's a weird headset with googles. That's not the tech. The tech is brain-tech interface. Gaming is the LEAST important feature of the ability to directly influence technology via thought alone.", "265" ], [ "I can tell you with almost 10000% certainty, the driving force behind this tech is NOT gaming. Gaming companies do not have the permits to perform MEDICAL research. Gaming is the afterthought in all this tech. All the leading research around brain to technological interface is conducted either by private medical labs or at universities. My university has a wheelchair you can (barely) control with your mind. \n\nAfter they have it working, it'll then go into augmentation territory. In Japan they're actively developing basically \"power armour\" Not for the military, but because they have an ageing population. They're goal is to basically make hydraulic support harnesses that will allow older people to be self-sufficient longer.\n\nWhen brain-to-tech inference becomes something, it'll be integrated into projects like that FAR sooner than gaming.", "917" ] ]
479
[ 9151, 1941, 4971, 4674, 12426, 14805, 4836, 8960, 2404, 23029, 4171, 22373, 10614, 14542, 1636, 4273, 12810, 19132, 830, 384, 3162, 16365, 5913, 3857, 9221, 10707, 1126, 1981, 14011, 9712, 21248, 3654, 2117, 4711, 14703, 1339, 13246, 12482, 7074, 3097, 2937, 8884, 7280, 12017, 10238, 25333, 16233, 2783, 11758, 1093, 20828, 18832, 654, 6245, 21036, 6669, 20610, 17488, 2045, 24481, 15826, 7593, 11262, 14118, 5390, 48, 1726, 5948, 8151, 5058, 8626, 18291, 3817, 8245, 17759, 18461, 15757, 12531, 12590, 21023, 1057, 7516, 1891, 8518, 14512, 10751, 1407, 397, 12467, 2363, 14080, 11005, 24213, 17281, 14162, 21104, 12005, 3822, 3512, 12258, 11809, 11556, 13640, 2216, 14261, 12028, 4493, 2998, 2085, 1960, 22225, 19359, 5789, 16212, 12843, 1479, 22439, 13287, 16101, 3149, 9627, 12411, 22163, 20284, 5105, 5108, 17953, 8557, 6092, 1207, 14339, 18263, 915, 13228, 10040, 18481, 20098, 11965, 13237, 9381, 6077, 14804, 10333, 11494, 7022, 5874, 22864, 7530, 3316, 4608, 14280, 7184, 4984, 10612, 6670, 24249, 412, 5067, 337, 12575, 16608, 8095, 6232, 8896, 25071, 10020, 24812, 1895, 17609, 25266, 18008, 11526, 3075, 16385, 7165, 3792, 13838, 3355, 13559, 2634, 7082, 9775, 12554, 18999, 8224, 2956, 7579, 12027, 18940, 10981, 10595, 3131, 6574, 12070, 3984, 19862, 5753, 3313, 10581, 4839, 17035, 13321, 18737, 1425, 5261, 1463, 8533, 7933, 11435, 6153, 23227, 1621, 11820, 8767, 14316, 7829, 4872, 13867, 5512, 17528, 2233, 2142, 4735, 594, 18003, 10085, 18898, 1044, 1411, 9967, 10783, 11838, 19516, 25468, 6529, 8110, 13037, 2370, 20210, 14105, 9319, 7075, 24275, 8867, 17212, 16727, 3389, 2113, 24577, 19759, 22034, 18224, 3467, 22983, 4882, 20127, 11288, 5038, 5537, 5716, 7492, 20898, 10551, 8226, 3, 10627, 16108, 18717, 15102, 10980, 17433, 22062, 13428, 2329, 21938, 7291, 20927, 5425, 14672, 5649, 4206, 1898, 16152, 19050, 14793, 10738, 9454, 3412, 5037, 13835, 9672, 8628, 3029, 24102, 11769, 11737, 14188, 6600, 9794, 12251, 13477, 17625, 15065, 7995, 25343, 7246, 20, 19255, 11866, 8387, 19693, 10462, 24471, 8629, 12846, 10324, 25166, 21958, 1819, 8913, 5777, 8141, 8796, 21183, 2579, 22079, 21778, 2441, 19676, 12705, 3460, 2134, 10513, 7267, 20363, 745, 22478, 9041, 7400, 19452, 9803, 16249, 21925, 7298, 14046, 4262, 8749, 5093, 1401, 715, 17643, 11461, 21128, 742, 21201, 13418, 13818, 3186, 25108, 19287, 4321, 9315, 3102, 10568, 9885, 5090, 14503, 21811, 5928, 3829, 21843, 11619, 23055, 24497, 6161, 1258, 6182, 24490, 19421, 9617, 5721, 9218, 20766, 13, 19513, 23106, 8272, 11430, 11760, 13354, 17296, 4489, 10376, 1763, 21549, 20634, 4851, 5836, 23353, 19856, 433, 23054, 12967, 16912, 25154, 4302, 16309, 2039, 16906, 3288, 13732, 3928, 15658, 22298, 20295, 25037, 12819, 22821, 7465, 593, 3122, 15122, 3216, 10106, 7710, 5378, 11762, 8581, 12562, 1055, 2457, 13780, 1765, 8590, 18496, 7515, 10786, 11851, 19116, 2105, 15198, 6652, 20942, 8770, 13164, 15646, 23588, 8566, 8358, 3911, 13095, 14436, 1306, 22020, 23074, 3806, 15655, 19400, 6328, 15918, 9621, 1800, 12006, 7676, 19376, 11431, 10298, 10280, 2708, 13029, 3520, 6258, 4252, 12189, 2923, 8367, 11197, 16828, 15482, 9488, 19405, 9890, 17432, 15246, 9849, 20531, 23028, 638, 23156, 4507, 19437, 1700, 4849, 73, 1427, 9042, 20882, 11507, 14755 ]
reddit_dump_--Feminem--
[ [ "Cats decimate the small mamal and bird population. They wreak havoc on the local environment. Your cats can handle being inside all day. Don't put your pet before the health of the environment please.\n\n[They are considered the most destructive invasive species in the current time](_URL_0_)\n\nThey murder billions of rodents and birds every year. Animals who are also struggling to adapt to their habitats being destroyed and pesticide use.", "287" ], [ "Copy and pasting so you'll see it. \n\nCats decimate the small mamal and bird population. They wreak havoc on the local environment. Your cats can handle being inside all day. Don't put your pet before the health of the environment please.\n\n[They are considered the most destructive invasive species in the current time](_URL_0_)\n\nThey murder billions of rodents and birds every year. Animals who are also struggling to adapt to their habitats being destroyed and pesticide use.\n\nPlease don't put your cat outside. They're literally an invasive species everywhere in the western world.", "287" ], [ "Outdoor cat owners are, in my experience, very defensive about letting their cat go outside. Last time I posted this in I think /r/AnimalsBeingBros I got massively downvoted, people telling me they just can't say no to their precious Fifi, and a few even saying they're putting their cat outside just to spite me. \n\nOutdoor cat owners are selfish people. They put their own personal happiness and the happiness of their cat above all else.\n\nEdit: Point proven. The amount of people desperately defending putting their cat outside just shows how selfish pet owners are. Have provided multiple sources from experts begging people not to put their cat outside, yet I'm still getting arm chair environmentalists who think they know better than people with graduate degrees in the subject. \nDon't put your cat outside people.", "287" ], [ "Tons of people if it's a big enough problem for outdoor cats and feral cats to be breeding in large enough quantities to be this big of an issue. Getting your cat Neutered seems to be a very Anglo centric thing. Cats in Turkey, Greece, Spwin, etc aren't nuetered nearly at the same rates as their Anglo counter parts.", "287" ], [ "Except it is selfish for the stated reason above. You're letting your cat murder and kill wild life when you let your cat outdoors. You're putting your cats personal happiness above the health of the environment. That's selfish. You gain nothing from letting them outside and perpetuate the deaths of billions of animals a year. \n\n\nCats are an invasive species everywhere but the middle east. You don't think it's selfish to let an invasive species roam free in the wild because it makes them \"happy\"? Definition of putting yourself before other regardless of consequence.", "287" ], [ "Yes but it will help. Your saying because it doesn't immediately fix the problem 100% it shouldn't be done? Really? The article literally says that we need to convince people to stop letting their cats outside because it would help curb the destruction of wild life. But I'm sure you know more about environmental health than the people who've spent their entire lives studying it, right?", "431" ], [ "Yes feral cats are the bigger issue. \n\nOutdoor domestic cats are also an issue. One being a bigger problems does not excuse the other. \n\nAlso, most cats don't kill for food. [Most cats, especially domestic cats, kill for fun. ](_URL_0_) Cats are literally programmed to hunt when they see prey, whether they're hungry or not. Domestic cats that are fed at home still kill wild animals not for food but because they enjoy it. \n\nJust because domestic cats aren't the biggest source doesn't mean they're neglidable or that it excuses selfish owners. Literally every expert implores cat owners to keep them indoors. You will be hard pressed to find someone who studies environmental health who thinks domestic cats being allowed outdoors isn't an issue.", "287" ], [ "Yes, it does say that feral cats do the most damage. \n\nHowever, the article also says that domestic cats are still an issue. \n\nOne being a bigger issue does not excuse the other issue, it isn't that hard to understand. \n\nWe can't do much about feral cats currently, but we sure as shit can do something about letting domestic cats out of the house. The article literally closes by saying we need to convince pet owners not to let their cats outside. If the overwhelming majority of experts who study environmental health are saying we shouldn't let cats outside, maybe there's a reason for that.", "287" ], [ "> Firstly, I'm saying we shouldn't because it's a lot of effort for something that won't immediately fix the problem\n\nHow the fuck is not opening the door a lot of effort??? All you have to do is literally nothing. Just keep your fucking cat inside. How is that effort? You do literally less work than if you had to let them in/out.\n\n > Secondly, the article says the solution 'might be' so even the writer is not sure that will work.\n\nExcept the article doesn't say might. It definitively says that domestic cats kill mamals and breed with ferals. There is no grey area here, it is defninitviely proven that domestic cats cause damage to the mamal and bird population. The only time the word 'might' shows up is when comparing solutions. \" One solution might be convincing people to keep their cats indoors (though most of the problem is created by feral cats, with no homes to be kept in). Another solution might be found in [coyotes, the natural predator of outdoor cats.](_URL_0_) \". It isn't saying that it 'might' work. It's saying that it might be the best solution to the problem. Not that it might or might not work.\n\nMight is being used as a comparative, not as a word to draw suspicion.\n\nBut hey, keep grasping at whatever straws you need to convince yourself that your not perpetuating the problem.\n\n > Because there are at least 2 more: You, who is spamming this on a subreddit,\n\nExcept I've been providing sources for all my claims. I know I'm not an expert, which is why I'm refering to actual experts on the matter.\n\n > and the writer of the article, who made the suggestion in the first place\n\nExcept the writer isn't pulling it out of his ass, he's writing about a academic jornal from the 'Nature Communications' organization which is authored by 3 people; <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON>, all who have graduate degrees in environmental studies or biology.\n\nSo no, the author isn't talking out of his ass. You are.\n\nLiterally everyone who studies environmental health will tell you that out door domestic cats are an issue. But no matter what the experts say, you'll still find a way to convince yourself that it's just 'too much work' because at the end of the day you're just lazy and don't want to change your ways.", "287" ], [ "No they still are. Cats kill for fun, they're literally programmed to kill things, they enjoy it. Neutered pets will still murder birds and small rodents even if they're well fed. Domestic cats are still responsible for a huge number of rodent and bird deaths, spayed/neutered or not. \n\nJust keep your cat inside. It's not hard.", "287" ], [ "> Fuck rats, and if a bird gets hunted it's just natural selection.\n\nThis is so woefully ignorant. Cats are an invasive species. They are not native to anywhere except the fertile crescent. There is literally nothing natural about cats being in NA hunting ground hogs or chipmunks, or in Spain hunting local mice.\n\nCats are invasive species. They have no natural predators in most places they have been brought and because of that they decimate the local wild life who haven't evolved alongside cats.\n\nEducated yourself please. You sound like the same type of person who hears about declining insect populations and go, \"Fuck yeah I hate mosquitoes\".", "431" ], [ "> Every cat and every environment is different\n\nExcept they really aren't. Cats are an invasive species everywhere but the fertile crescent where they were domesticated. Everywhere else they are, by literal definition, an invasive species. \n\n > You cannot keep him inside. He would die of depression \n\nYou can, you're just too lazy/soft to actually do it. You put the happiness of your pet before the health of the environment. You cat would be angry for a bit but they'd get used to it. You're just not willing to keep him inside because you want your cat to be happy. I get that, I do, but you have to consider is your cat's temporary happiness really worth the damage they do to the enviornment and the wildlife? Your cat has problem killed hundreds of animals over the year without you knowing it. Do those animals deserve to die because it makes your cat happy? \n\n > If the wild one kills a field mouse behind the house every now and then, I am not worried about it at all, and neither would any of my neighbors be. \n\nExcept it's not every now and again. It's all the time 24/7. Cat's are literally designed to hunt and kill. They enjoy it. Even if it isn't for food, they are still insticual hunters who enjoy killing things just for fun. When they are outside they are looking for 2 things: Something to kill and something to fuck. That's what cats do. \n\nYour cat kills way, way more animals than just a mice every now and again. You just don't see it.", "287" ], [ "> Does it help? *technically*. Is it worth millions of cat owners changing the way they and their pets live their lives? Nah dude.\n\nThen how come all the experts on the subject, who've spent their entire lives studying this problem, say otherwise? Why is it that if every single article on this subject implores cat owners to keep their cats inside, is it a non-issue? Who should I trust, the people who have graduate degrees in the field, have conducted actual research, have published articles in peer reviewed journals, all who say that leaving domestic cats outdoors is an issue that must be stopped.\n\nOr the cat owners on Reddit who are just now for the first time reading about the devestation their lil precious Fifi brings to the local wild life?\n\nWhy do you believe you know more than actual experts? If all the experts are saying the exact same thing, then maybe they're saying that for a reason.\n\nYou sound no different than people who say, \"Well yeah climate change is an issue and we should stop using as much fossil fuels, but is it really worth the inconvience of going without? I mean how big of an impact can my lil SUV REALLY be?\" \n\nJust because feral cats are a bigger issue doesn't mean domestic cats aren't an issue themselves. They can both be addressed at the same time. \n\nBut it is far, FAR easier for cat owners to just keep their fucking cats inside than it is to get rid of all the feral cats in the world.", "287" ], [ "Yes, feral cats do more damage. Domestic cats are still a part of the problem.\n\nSaying that because Feral cats do more damage, therefore we shouldn't do anything about domestic cats is like saying because the USA produces more CO2 emissions than Europeans shouldn't do anything about their CO2 emissions. \n\nJust because one problem is larger doesn't mean you can't do anything about a problem. \n\nAnd what is easier, keeping your cats indoors, or killing all the feral cats? It's far, far easier to just keep your damn cat inside than it is to go out and get rid of all feral cats. But keeping your cat inside will still make a dent in the problem.", "287" ], [ "> To me, the pets I own deserve to be able to see everything they wish to\n\nEven when it causes massive devestation to the local wild life? Why is your cats happiness more important the the lives of the hundreds of animals they will kill over it's life? \n\n > Their lives are way shorter than ours and confiscating them in a building their whole life, to me is nothing more than a prison.\n\nThen take them outside supervised. You can do that you know. They make leashes for cats. You don't have to keep your cat inside all the time for it to be an indoor cat. \n\nLetting them outside on their own where they can murder hundreds of small animals every year is wrecking havoc on wild life who are already struggling to adapt to humans destroying their habitats and using pesticides to poison them.\n\n > I cherish my pets lives even over my own\n\nYou seem to cherish your pets lives more than the health of the environment which isn't okay. Not to mention, you're exposing your cat to things like coyotes, parasites, infection, other cats that want to fight, etc.\n\nIf you really cared about your pet you'd realize letting them outside just because it makes them happy is a danger to themselves and to the environment. [Outdoor cats tend to live shorter lives than indoor cats.](_URL_0_)\n\nStop trying to find justifications for you being careless and irresponsible. Putting your cat outdoors is a danger to the environment and the cat you supposedly love so much.", "287" ], [ "Imagine being this fucking ignorant. \n\nSo you want to expose your cat that you supposedly love to dangerous parasites, infections, and disease? Am I getting that right? Not to mention things like coyotes, dogs, and other cats? \n\nWe don't need cats to control pests. We have technology and modern medicine. You just want to put your cat outside because you're a lazy and selfish person end of story.", "287" ], [ "> Lmao 2 dead rats every now and again and a couple lizards isn't gonna destroy the planet.\n\nMultiply that by the millions of outdoor cats and yeah, it is going to have a huge impact. Not to mention, they're killing way, way more than 2 rats \"every now and again\". \" Cats are responsible for the deaths of 1.4 to 3.7 billion birds and 6.9 to 20.7 billion mammals \" according to the source I provided. Billions. Cats kill BILLIONS of these animals. If you think that has no impact you're delusional. \n\n > And yes, vermin like rats do deserve to die cos they're vermin for a reason \n\nExcept they kill more than just rats. They kill birds, mice, chipmunks, lizards, insects, bees, spiders, fish, etc. These animals play a vital part in the ecosystem and having an invasive species like cats kill them in the BILLIONS has a huge impact on the planet. \n\n > Every cat is different, like legitimately they are. \n\nEvery cat is a hunter by instinct. No exception. They are literally biologically driven to try and hunt and kill things, not just for food, but for fun. All cats want to hunt, all cats want to kill. It's literally their biological instinct to.", "431" ], [ "> Do you realize the purpose of a housecat?\n\nIf you think most people are getting house cats to get rid of bugs and mice you're delusional. Most people get cats because they want companionship. I highly, highly doubt many people are getting cats to get rid of pests in an age when mousetraps and exterminators are a thing. A cat would be way more expensive both upfront and long term, and more responsibility. \n\nPeople get cats for companionship, not pest control.", "287" ], [ "> But evolution made them this way\n\nYes, exactly. Evolution made them killing machines. Which is why when we bring them to places they're not native to, with little to no natural predators, they are catastrophic to the environment. Cat's are invasive species everywhere but the Fertile Crescent. They are invasive species and invasive species are not something that should be allowed to roam free. \n\n > You can't simply change that by making a cat live in a secluded area all of it's life \n\nYou LITERALLY can though. You can stop your cat from murdering hundreds of animals over it's life if you just kept in indoors. And if every outdoor cat owner did the same, then it'd make quite a big dent in the over all problem. \n\n > What about the strays? \n\nPlaying whataboutism isn't a good argument. Yes, strays are a problem too. What do you think is easier, rounding up all the strays and culling them, or just not opening your damn door because you can't handle listening to some angry meowing. \n\nJust because strays are a bigger problem doesn't excuse careless and selfish pet owners. They are responsible for billions of animals being killed by their pets. This is fact. Just because strays do more damage doesn't mean we should just let lazy pet owners off the hook. \n\nIf anything, they should be held to an even higher level of responsibility. There's already a problem of feral cats destroying wild life and then they further exacerbate the problem by allowing their cats outside. They quite literally add fuel to an already burning inferno of a problem.", "287" ], [ "And we've reached a point where we no longer need them to get rid of pests thanks to modern science and technology. \n\nModern society was also built on the back of oil and coal which we now know has horrific evironmental impacts so we're slowly but surely changing. We now know that out door cats and ferals have horrific environmental impacts, so we should change that.", "431" ], [ "> disease carrying pests\n\nExcept they kill more than just pests. They kill birds, insects (which we desperately need), spiders, bees, lizards, other cats, etc. They kill animals that play a vital and important part of the enviornment and thinking otherwise just shows you know literally nothing about this. \n\nYou're literally just a selfish person who doesn't care about the environmental impacts of your actions. You're no different than the people who drive giant lifted trucks or throw pounds of plastic into the ocean every year.", "64" ], [ "Imagine being this woefully ignorant my god. \n\nThey really can't. Evolution requires millions of years to change. Cats are literally brand new. They're invasive species. Unless you think the kiwi should have just evolved to Europeans bringing over dogs and wolves. \n\nEducated yourself. Your cat is an invasive species wrecking havoc on the environment. Putting your cat outside is no different than using copious amounts of pesticide or throwing pounds of plastic into the ocean.", "287" ], [ "> Alright let's kill all the cats\n\nWe should definitely cull feral cats for sure. Just like we culled all other invasive species like rabbits, frogs, and anacondas and certain fish. Invasive species are humanity's fault to begin with we should bear the responsibility of fixing it. Feral cats should most definitely be killed for the benefit of the environment. And I think outdoor cats should be too because their owners are clearly too irresponsible to keep them indoors. At a certain point your pet becomes a threat to the environment and should be taken care of. \n\n > And what do you mean we have the technology? \n\nWe have better, more effective alternatives to pest control and disease prevention than cats now a days. Cats were needed when we didn't know how to control pests without them. We do now. We no longer need cats to control pests. Letting them roam free only hurts the planet. \n\n > Well let me enlighten you on this mystical \"technology\" \n\nI mean, just keeping our trash away from human habitation has decreased pest infestation quite significantly. Not to mention things like traps can cut down on pests, if you have them, quite a bit. And you realize you can use targeted poison, right? Exterminators don't just spray willy nilly, they're very, very deliberate about what and where they spray. \n\n > Grow up \n\nYeah, you should grow up and realize that your outdoor cat is an environmental disaster. Letting your cat outside is no different than using copious amounts of pesticides, or throwing pounds of plastic into the ocean. Your actions are leading to the deaths of animals already struggling to adapt to human activity. Grow up and realize your actions have consequences.", "287" ], [ "You were the one that said people get cats for pest control. Burden of proof is on you. I have never, in my 21 years of life, met a single person who got a cat for pest control.\n\nBut since you'll just think that means you're right, [The ASPCA asked 1,500 people who adopted pets why they got their animal.](_URL_0_) Not a single one in the 1,500 said they got theirs for pest control. Not a single one. I don't know the break down between cats/dog in that survey, but i would wager it's roughly equal. So out of \\~750 cat adoptions not a single person said pest control was their reason for getting a pet. \n\n99% of people don't get a cat for pest control. We don't need cats for that anymore, we've moved well beyond the capabilities of that. \n\nStop letting your cat outside. Your actions are devastating your local wild life. It's no different than throwing pounds of plastic into the ocean or using copious amounts of pesticides.", "287" ], [ "> You are all over this thread arguing with the densest of brick walls\n\nIt just astounds me that no matter how much evidence I provide, no matter how many experts who've spent their lives studying environmental health I quote, no matter how many peer-reviewed journals I give, dumbasses will still argue with me saying, \"Oh well it's feral cats my precious Fifi isn't a danger to anything if I let her outside unsupervised for hours at a time\". \n\nIt's just pure arrogance and pure laziness on the part of the cat owner. And if you tell them they're doing something wrong, they take it personally, or even worse put their cat out to spite you. Literally had a dude say he put his cat outside just because I told him not too like how childish are some folk. It boils my blood. Thanks for the kind words, truly appreciate it. Nice to see some sanity in a see of ignorance.", "287" ], [ "I mean, I'll never ask to go first if the dude only has a couple of items. But if I only have, say, burger buns or something, and the people in front of me have an entire cart full of items, then yeah I might ask. it's all about context. If the people in front of me barely have that many more items than I do then I wont ask. But if they have a months worth of groceries in their cart and I'm just tryna buy vegetable oil or something like that, yeah i'll ask.", "616" ], [ "> And I’ll politely say no\n\nThat's fine, you're free to do so. But you have to admit, if you have a months worth of groceries and the person behind you only has one thing and you say no, you're a bit of an ass. The person with one thing will take 30 seconds out of your day whereas your cart full of groceries could take 5+ minutes easy by the time everything scans, paid, and is bagged.", "616" ], [ "> I can see your point but humans cause far more destruction of the environment and murder far more animals than cats.\n\nYes, and we're slowly but surely adjusting our behavior to minimize our impact. Cat's don't have our intelligence so they can't do that, so we have to do that for us. \n\n > Can you handle being inside all day? \n\nI don't go outside and have a drive to murder everything I see for fun. Cat's do. They kill for fun and for food, they just really love to kill whatever they can get their hands on. And keeping your cat inside is better for the cat anyways, [outdoor cats live drastically shorter lives than indoor cats](_URL_0_). Besides, millions of cats do fine indoors and live very happy and healthy lives indoors. Your cat is no different. If you want to take your cat outside get a leash and take them outside. Be a responsible pet owner. Just letting your cat out willy nilly with no supervision is not only terrible for the environment, but it's also just being a irresponsible pet owner.", "287" ], [ "I mean yes, do you know what domestication is? You little kitty is quite literally a human invention. Just like dogs are derived from wolves and cows are derived from aurochs. Cats were domesticated \\~5000 years ago. Before that they were much bigger and more aggressive but we selectively bred them into the form that they are today. 5,000 years is literally fucking nothing on an evolutionary stand point.\n\nAlso, do you know what the concept of invasive species is? Cats literally are brand new to the Americas, Europe, and Asia. They did not exist until humans brought them there. They literally are brand new there.\n\nEducated yourself please. Swear to god some of you people never passed 5th grade biology.", "287" ], [ "No they really haven't. Cats were domesticated around 4-5000 years ago. That is literally nothing on a evolutionary standpoint. To think entire ecosystems can adapt in just a few thousand years is beyond ignorant. Evolution operated on a scale of hundreds of thousands if not millions of years. Domestic cats are most definitely not a part of any ecosysyem naturally not even close.", "287" ], [ "> The original cat species that the domesticated house cat came from is still alive in Northern Africa\n\nYes, and they are larger than most domestic cats. [Wild Cat Magazie states the average weight of an African Wild Cat is 6-15lbs.](_URL_0_) [Average house cat weight is 7-10lbs according to google](_URL_1_). African wild cats are typically longer, and have larger paws than their house cat counter parts. They were and still are bigger than most healthy house cats, units and chonkers (aka animal abuse) aside. \n\n > there has been small cat species all over the Eurasia before then eitherway. \n\nAnd now there are tens of millions of small cats in Eurasia that aren't native to local ecosystems. They are an invasive species both by geographic location and sheer numbers. The envrionment isn't suited to handle millions of feral and outdoor cats.", "287" ], [ "> What about the Lynx? The Asian Golden Cat? The Andean Mountain Cat? The Black Footed Cat? The Asian Leopard Cat\n\nI didn't know millions of those types of cats existed, especially in environments that they aren't native too like domestic cats are. You realize not all cats are the same? That's like saying because Africa has Lions then domestic cats aren't a problem because they 'have cats so therefore their environment is used to cats'. Different cats hunt different things. \n\nThere are millions of feral and outdoor cats in places that they didn't exist before. Your outdoor cat is an invasive species no matter how you look at it. Letting your cat outside is not only being an irresponsible pet owner, letting your cat come into contact with a myriad of disease, but it's also being an irresponsible person because you're perpetuating the deaths of billions of mammals and birds every year.", "287" ], [ "> What's wrong with letting them out?\n\nBesides exposing your cat to a myriad of disease, the fact that outdoor and feral cats kill literal billions of small mammals, birds, and insects every year wrecking havoc on animals already struggling to adapt to human activity.\n\n > My cats are too well fed to catch anything other than moths so it's not like they're decimating the wildlife \n\nCat's kill mostly for fun. They don't care how well they are fed, it is in their instinct to hunt and to kill. They enjoy hunting. You like to believe that they only hunt moths but they don't they hunt and kill anything they get their hands on whether they need food or not.", "287" ], [ "> Like people can't detach \"aww cat\" from \"invasive pest\"\n\nYup this is the root of the problem. So many people think their lil precious Fifi can't possibly have any negative impact on the world around them, when in reality their little cat is a murder machine. Outdoor and feral cats are quite literally invasive pests everywhere but the fertile crescent where they were domesticated. \n\nThis thread is boiling my blood at how ignorant and selfish so many cat owners are. So many are like, \"Aww I just wanna make my cat happy\" without even caring about the consequences of their actions. Had one guy literally said he put his cat outside just because I explained why it's horrible for the environment. \n\nIgnorant people like that is the reason the planet is dying.", "287" ], [ "I don't like bagel deli cause the two times I've been there the person taking my order was super rude. First time I asked what they recommend and the girl rolled her eyes and said \"something with salmon\" in a really annoyed tone. Like it was a giant inconvenience to recommend something out of there 100x items that are all just slightly variations of each other. \n\n\nSecond time they just got my order wrong and when I tried to get it fixed they were patronizing and said \"Are you sure you didn't order this?\"", "897" ], [ "Protesting an industry that [is burning down the Amazon Rainforrest,](_URL_1_) causes [cancer and is is a Class 1 carcinogenic like cigarettes, alchohol, and asbestos,](_URL_0_) not to mention the ungodly amount of [methane and carbon released](_URL_2_) by livestock. Oh, and lets not forget that we're literally poisoning our water and dumping an excessive amount of nitrogen into the oceans with fertilizer to grow feed for livestock. Doesn't really seem useless to me. \n\nCompletely disregarding the ethical argument because who am I to tell another person how to determine their moral compass, but just speaking with objective facts the meat industry is a blight on our society. It's completely unsustainable and we as a species would benefit greatly by reducing our meat and animal product consumption. \n\nI'm not saying we should all go vegan,I certainly cannot however hard I try, but we should definitely reconsider our relationship with meat and animal products. Right now, westerners eat a fuck ton of meat because they can afford it while developing nations consume far, far less meat per capita because it's more expensive. But as India, SE Asia, and African countries develop, and have more disposable income, they will want to start buying more meat. And Earth can barely sustain itself feeding just Westerners. Imagine an entire planet eating meat at the rates Americans, or fuck, even Europeans do... It's already devestating enough just tryna sasiate the Wests desire for meat. Imagine trying to feed a few more billion people meat at the rates of the West....", "166" ], [ "> ou don’t want to kill a living organism, but you have no problem baking bread with yeast in it\n\nif you think comparing eukaryotic cells to a living, breathing, sentient animal is the same thing, then you're either purposefully being obtuse for the sake of obtuseness, or you're just really, really dumb. \n\nVegans don't like murdering things that have the same emotions as you and I and can feel emotions. You're deliberately misrepresenting their argument to fuel your anti-vegan circle jerk.", "909" ], [ "Supermarkets are the biggest purchasers of meat and are often the only customers for meat farms, so yes, they do. By financially supporting the people who do burn the rainforesst, over fertilize, and give careless amount of antibiotics to their animals makes you just as guilty as the people performing the physical acts. \n\nA man who pays for a hitman is still responsible for the murder.", "766" ], [ "> Surprised you didn’t tell me you are vegan, since I’m sure you tell everyone else.\n\nExcept I'm not, I just think the weird anti-vegan circle jerk you're rubbing your 2 incher to is bizare. It's an undeniable fact that the meat industry is bad for the planet and bad for peoples health, but instead of changing our habits like we did with lead gasoline and smoking, instead people like you belittle others who are trying to promote change. Agriculture accounts for \\~8% of global emissions and livestock alone contributes to half of that. Then factor in the fact that the vast majority of crops grown are grown specifically for livestock feed and that number gets close to \\~6-7%. \n\n > Also those organisms that you have no problem gassing and poisoning in a very systematic way are the building blocks of the entire food chain. \n\nAnd don't have sentience, feel pain, have emotions, or contribute to global warming at anyway near a comparable rates as say a cow or a pig does. But you're right, killing a single yeast cell is the EXACT same thing as killing a cow. You're so logical and smart, you sure owned those libtards epic style xDDD", "909" ], [ "> You are not vegan but you are preaching to me about the fact that I’m not?\n\nI'm saying that you're deliberating misrepresenting what vegans stand for because you have a 2inch hate boner for people who actually are passionate about something. You know literally nothing about veganism yet you're over here trying to be clever with a 'Gotcha' moment when in reality you just show your ignorance on the subject. \n\nI eat meat, not a lot and i try my best to go without, but it's not always feasible. But I respect the hell out of vegans because they're actually willing to do something and try to make the world a little bit better. Whereas you're just over here belittling others for caring and trying to look like a Mentat by making these false equivalancies to purposely fuel your micro dicked hate boner for them.", "909" ], [ "People don't like knowing that what they're doing is destructive. It's why smokers get pissy at anti-smoking advocates, or in the mid 19th century when it was discovered that Doctors not washing their hands were spreding disease. \n\nPeople don't like knowing what they're doing is horrible for the environment. So instead they plug their ears and ignore the truth so they don't have to change at all and can continue living in ignorance. \n\nCrazy to me that this very subreddit was pissed off about the amazon being on fire, but now that it's associated with meat consumption it magically stopped being such a controversial issue.", "30" ], [ "Everyone wants to fight against climate change, but no one wants to actually do anything about it. They expect everyone else to do it for them while they change literally nothing about their habits or way of life. Pretty sad that people just cannot FATHOM cutting back on their meat consumption despite 1) the fact that it's a literally class 1 carcinogen and 2) it's contributing the death of our planet. \n\nEveryone wants change, but no one is willing to change.", "687" ], [ "Bruh the worst part about this site is the democracy of the voters. I'm a physics student and the amount of misleading shit I see on here regarding special relativity, quantum mechanics/field theory, or just even simple things like kinematics or electrostatics is insane. If you dare try to explain why they're misinterpreting a study, or how they're just flat out wrong, you get mass downvoted and called a moron or /r/iamverysmart or something. /r/Futurology is especially bad about this, I literally had a guy try to debate with me about things I did for my undergrad research. But because I'm not making grand, romantic claims like reversing entropy, or how we totally 100% could make a worm hole using nukes or some shit, you get downvoted and everyone assumes you're wrong.\n\nIf I have to read one more fucking time about how entanglement breaks causality or the shitty alien metaphor for relativity, I'm going postal.\n\nGod and don't even get me fucking started on the \"\"\"engineers\"\"\" (who totally aren't freshmen who've barely passed Calc1) on this site... The people who try and nitpick studies like this are almost 100% just trying to look smart. It's 1000x easier to try and pick apart short comings another person's work than it is to actually find application or improvements on that work. As it goes, \"Everyone is a critique, not everyone is a chef\"", "950" ], [ "What is posted =! what this sub upvotes. There's a shit ton of people posting stuff that doesn't get upvoted. And I'd wager that what gets upvoted reflects much more on the demographic of this sub than what gets posted since so many posts die in /new/. So I went to the top posts of the past week and found four \\[[1](_URL_1_) [2](_URL_3_) [3](_URL_0_) [4](_URL_2_)\\] on the first page that essentially boil down to 'generic girl starterpack'. \n\nI wasn't keeping too close of an eye, but on that page I saw exactly one other subject that had more than 1 starter pack: hip pastors. \n\nSo it seems like this sub really loves to make fun of teenage girls/young women and really likes to make fun of hip youth pastors.", "434" ], [ "> At least Reddit likes stem.\n\nThey love the idea of STEM, not stem itself. If they truly loved stem then the debate over trans people wouldn't exist, the debate over guns would have ceased the second dozens of journals all published papers stating guns are the primary factor in mass shootings, the debate over the agricultural industry's impact on the planet wouldn't exist. \n\nReddit loves the IDEA of stem because at their hearts they're just nerds who like sci fi and thinks that claiming they like STEM will make them geniuses. The truth of the matter is the only thing they like is pop science that can be easily digestable and anything that's shiny. If it requires a modicum of brain cells to think about, they disregard it. \n\n > I'm trying to get in to a master's for gender studies research. . \n\nGo for it, I think that'd be really rewarding, just be prepared for a lifetime of defending your research from people too dumb to even pass a highschool level sociology class.", "945" ], [ "For real dude... If someone got upset over chocolate milk at a party on my campus they'd be laughed at. Party rule 101: don't leave anything out you care about. Part of throwing a party is understanding people will come into your space. I'm not condoning the girls it's definitely a party foul to be digging through someone's stuff, but getting upset over chocolate milk being drank at a party has to be one of the most minute things i've ever seen someone get upset about.", "145" ], [ "> No offense but yeah he did. They didn’t live there. It’s super disrespectful to just go in peoples fridge\n\nit's a house party bro. Yeah, it's a party foul to be digging in the fridge, but it's literally what you expect. The girls are in the wrong 100%, but if you're throwing a party part that is having people do shit like that. At the end of the day, it's a $2 gallon of milk that he felt was a hill worth dying on v.s just letting the vibe flow.\n\nIf me or any of my brothers got upset over a girl drinking chocolate milk we would be laughed out of the party. It's such a minute thing to get upset about, especially at a house party none the less.", "710" ], [ "> Within 20 posts in hot, 2 were related to young women(1%\n\nIf that's not a typo you're even dumber than you're letting on.\n\n > This is nearly not enough to boil this sub to making fun of just young woman\n\nI never said this sub exclusively targets women. Find me a direct quote of me saying that. I said this sub beats the concept to death with repetitive, low effort starter packs that boil down to 'woman who likes popular things #127932'. Which is does. Out of every single demographic to make fun of, young women are disproportionaltely represented here. Even your own sample size supports that.\n\nI ask this respectfully, but are you on the spectrum? Because I've never seen such a concentrated display of autism in my life.\n\nFucking christ i was not expecting to have a dissertation on the over representation of women in /r/starterpacks tonight but here we are.", "181" ], [ "> He's the dumbass that dropped out of school to become some wannabe gangster homo with rainbow hair color and shit. Fuck him, couldn't care less for someone that put themselves and their family in a situation like this.\n\nin this sentence you're\n\n1. Homophobic. Using 'homo' as a pejorative? The fuck is this, 2005? \n2. Wrong. He was in a legitimate gang, nothing wannabe about it.\n3. Didn't really do anything to put them in that situation. His old gang was already trying to extort him and was threatening to murder his family anyway. You saying you wouldn't snitch on people threatening to murder your mother?\n4. Trashier than most of the posts in this sub", "331" ], [ "Man, imagine that, a post that is entirely unrelated to politics yet you fucking trumptards just can't have a single fucking conversation without pushing your dumbass American politics everywhere.\n\nGuess what, this has nothing to do with <PERSON> bro. Literally zilch. This was an issue well before <PERSON> came into office and it'll be an issue well beyond <PERSON>'s time in office. So fucking sick of Americans constantly pushing their stupid fucking politics in every single facet of life. Give it a fucking break. Get a damn hobby, something other than cleaning his ass with your tongue. This is an issue the West, China/korea/japan, and all developing countries that are establishing a middle class need to solve. \n\nBut expecting a <PERSON> voting American to see the world as anything other than a competition is well beyond your comprehension. \n\n > I encourage Brazilians to stop eating meat, growing food, and re-establish their little rainforest so that I can enjoy AC at full blast and a 32 oz steak for me and my dog.\n\nThis is the type of mentality that my 6 year old newphew has. What does that say about you?", "856" ], [ "The difference is no other demographic is as represented as the 'teenage girl bad' starterpacks. I'm not saying teenage girls are immune from starter packs or being made fun of, but every single starter pack is the exact same. picture of leggings, starbucks, some indie artists like <PERSON> or <PERSON>, ticktock/snapchat/instagram, an iphone, dog snap filter, a quote about not being like the other girls, maybe some vans or a beanie if it's suppose to be an 'edgy girl'.\n\nSeriously, I would wager 90% of starterpacks contain at least these things: snapchat/tiktok/instagram maybe all 3, starbucks, and apple product, a reference to some form of nicotine, and leggings. No seriously, go search 'girl' on this sub and see for yourself. \n\nI swear to god. Ever. Single. One. Every single starterpack about a girl has those things in it. To the point where it's just so fucking over done that it's not even funny anymore. There's tons and tons of good material to be made about teenage girls, but the stuff that actually gets posted is just the same fucking 5 things with some minute differences over, and over, and over, and over again. Fucking hell, make a basic bitch starter pack, just make it original. There's only a few hundred times you can see the same starterpack before it gets derivative.", "282" ], [ "> What the fuck argument did you have before the rainforest?\n\nThe other arguments i listed? Not to mention, deforestation to make more grazing land has been going on for literal centuries. This isn't a new development, we're just now seeing the effects of it. The only difference is the Amazon is recent and is a direct result of the growing desire for meat. \n\n > Because that seems to be about all you have nowadays \n\n'all i have' is the very destruction of the earth's lungs that help pull millions of tons of Co2, the leading greenhouse gas, out of the air every year. Seems pretty important. \n\n > it has almost nothing to do with the meat industry outside of south america \n\n[Brazil is the largest exporter of beef. And is expected to supply \\~23% of the world's beef by 2028.](_URL_0_)\n\nBut sure, a country that is deforesting one of the lungs of the earth to produce beef that supplies over 1/5th of the entire global supply of beef definitely has no impact outside South America. \n\nAnd even if the impact was only localized to South America, who fucking cares, South Americans are people too who deserve to not have their environment destroyed for capital gain. And I think we can all agree that no one wants climate change, yet no one seems to be doing the easiest thing you could do to help curb it: reducing your meat consumption. You don't have to eliminate it, but even if everyone were to reduce it by \\~10% that would still be millions of tons of Co2 and methane saved from entering the atmosphere.", "637" ], [ "> \"Earth's lungs\", haha go educate yourself you dumb cunt. All the oxygen produced by the Amazon is used by the Amazon.\n\nReally? Because the vast majority of plants top out at \\~50% re-absorption of the oxygen they produced throughout the day through respiration. Animals and microbes probably take another signifigant chunk but not anywhere near another 50%. Most sources put the oxygen content produced by the Amazon to be \\~5-6%. Which if you think is insignificant wait until you learn what reducing that + the mass extinction of plankton will do to the oxygen/carbon balance of our atmosphere! \n\nBut that isn't the only argument against not deforesting the planet. For one, trees capture a fuck ton of carbon, something we really need to get out of the atmosphere. Two, it's destroying habitats of wild life already struggling to adapt to human habitation. Three, the amazo's rain (hence rainforrest) helps regulate water temperature and El Nino a very important weather pattern. Without this regulation El nino becomes much more erratic and will lead to greater tropical storms, drastically more variability in weather on years with El nino. And four, continuing deforestation will decrease precipitation in the local area making crop much more expensive to grow, livestock to become less economically viable, and humans in the area will have to deal with the growing drought.\n\n > You can't use that argument for the entire meat industry when it is that remote region of it affected by that specifically\n\nExcept the part that it doesn't just effect South Americans. El Nino's effects are frequently felt in North America and making it more erratic + rising temperature will lead to insane tropical storms and potentially even hurricanes on the west coast. Evapotranspiration helps cool the atmosphere by releasing water molecules into the air. Seems pretty silly to be cutting off something that cools the planet down as we are drastically raising the temperature, no?\n\nOh, and that whole thing about protecting biodiversity of the planet which is already pretty fucked, why make it worse?\n\nThis effects everyone buddy. You know nothing about what your talking about.", "637" ], [ "People rather live in ignroant bliss than live with the ugly truth. People don't like being told that their habits aren't sustainable and damaging. It's why doctors threw a bitch fit when they discovered not washing their hands was spreading disease, or why smokers dislike anti-smoking advocates so much. People don't like having to confront the reality that what they're doing is bad. And eating meat is bad. Fucking delicious, but it's terrible. \n\nThat's the thing I find most infuriating about climate change conversations. Everyone wants change, but no one wants to change. Everyone wants the government or scientists to figure out how to solve everything while making literally zero sacrifices. \n\nJust boggles my mind how many people get personally defensive and offended when even discussing the fact that meat is harmful to the planet. I've been called a bitch, pussy, and uneducated (lol) for posting this comment. And I tried to be as objective and rationale as I could and I still get people tryna piss in my cherios over it.", "687" ], [ "And Astralis lost 0-2 (16:8 and 16:9) to Godsent with <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON> on the team after they won their first major. <PERSON> and <PERSON>.... \n\nYou act like online tournaments mean anything lol. Specially now. I completely forgot online T1 used to be a thing. God ECS is irrelevant, just make it lan like ESL", "720" ], [ "Full grown, north American, adult men (minus <PERSON>) throw a game that they consciously knew people had money on so they could personally benefit? Unban them! We demand justice! This is unfair, they didn't realize the consequences of their action!! \n\nA 13 year old south american cheats in match making with literally zero stakes for anyone involved? Fuck him, he deserves no sympathy!\n\nHe was banned for doing something before his balls even dropped. But because he isn't iBP (and probably cause he's South American too) no one cares. \n\nJust crazy to me that full grown adults with developed brains who were fully aware of their actions gets so much sympathy on this sub but a kid who impacted meaningless matches on MM gets none. \n\nNot saying either should be banned, but the double standard is so obvious is depressing.", "441" ], [ "> or how old he is, for that matter\n\nNo place on earth continues to punish you as an adult for a mistake you made before your balls even dropped.\n\n<PERSON> was caught cheating on a Lan for money but because it wasn't VAC everyone is able to forgive him. <PERSON> also got caught cheating before GO, but everyone forgave him. iBP where everyone was a developed adult except swag, literally threw a game that their fans had put money on them, just for their own personal gain. Yet everyone constantly circle jerks to get them unbanned because it's \"unfair\" to be punished forever for a mistake you make years ago.\n\nEven in criminal court for all but the most extreme cases (e.g murder, serial rape) will release a child upon their 18th and usually seal any convictions you might have so that child can start a new hopefully having learned from their mistake.\n\nPunishing someone for what they did at 13 as they are now an adult is asinine as hell.", "70" ], [ "> If you don't understand that all of these issues stem from population\n\nExcept, [according to actual scientists](_URL_0_), Earth actual carrying capacity is \\~9-10 billion. We've still got a few billion to go before worrying about over population. \n\nThe problem doesn't stem from too little resources, but instead how wastefully those resources are spent.\n\nAre you really going to advocate genocide over cutting back on your consumption?", "795" ], [ "Yeah fuck actually trying to save the planet amirite it's just better to roll over and give up. Saving the planet is impossible just like creating denser than water boats. Oh wait, we did that. Oh well, it's just as impossible as putting someone on the moon. Oh wait, we did that. Well, it's just as impossible as having instantaneous communication globally. Oh wait, we did that too. \n\nHumans have a very long history of just saying, it's impossible forget about it. But then we do what everyone says is impossible. \n\nBut keep living in ignorance dude.", "795" ], [ "People are children. They don't like being told what they're doing is destructive so rather than accept that they purposefully ignore it. It's the same as children. Hell, I have people messaging me pictures of their steak calling me a libtard lol. \nJust children in the bodies of adults. They'd rather ignore their destructive behavior than actually change. \n\nWhich is the most infuriating part of climate change. Everyone talks about wanting change, but no one wants to change.", "687" ], [ "You sound like someone who's never thrown a house party lol. \n\nGetting upset over a $2 jug of milk at a house party is one of the bitchiest things I could imagine happening at a party. If one of my frat brothers did that we'd kick them out of the party for being a dipshit. If you're throwing a house party part of that is realizing you'll have people in your house and going throigh your shit. \n\nDon't want people going into your fridge? Bike lock it. Put it somewhere else. Drink it or eat it or whatever. \n\nBut that's part of throwing a party. And anyone getting upset over milk is just a douche. If I saw any of my brothers do that to two people who were having a good time we put them on bouncer duty and tell them to shut the fuck up.", "145" ], [ "Except its not in isolation. [Veganism has grown over 600% in the past fice years from < 1% to ~6% of total consumers ](_URL_0_)\n\n\nSo it's definitely a growing and the most cited reasons why is ethical and environmental reasons \n\nAnd I'm not even telling people they need to go vegan. Im saying we need to recontexualize how central meat plays a role in our diets. Meat should not be the staple of our diets. Humans are not meant to eat meat 2/3 times a day 7 days a week. Having meat in moderation is fine. But having meat for every meal every day like so many people do is entirely unsunstainable and really unhealthy. We need to start viewing meat as the luxury product it is, rather than an essential part of every meal. Even a reduction of just 10% of your meat consumption can reduce your carbon footprint quite significantly", "909" ], [ "Words with meaning? Words literally designed to Target minorities and put them down? Like do you think words exist without cultural context or definition?\n\nLike how come it's always the straight white people saying slurs are just words lol. The one demographic not affected by slurs in Western society always the one saying slurs don't mean anything lmao\n\n[lmao why am I not surprised to find a link about you bitchting about not being able to be casually racist ](_URL_0_)\n\n\nFun fact for you, going up to a Chinese person and saying \"<PERSON>\" is very, very racist. Apparently you need someone to tell you that.", "389" ], [ "Holy hell this times a million. It's so frustrating seeing straight white people who are literally unaffected by slurs in the West constantly pull the, \"yOU cAn cHooSe nOt tO be OfFENded\" and \"tHeYre JuST woRdS!\". The amount of the times I've seen straight people on this site try and argue that \"f*g\" doesn't mean a gay person who how \"n$ & ?er\" isn't a racial slur anymore because we say \"nigga\" thus it's \"lost\" it's slur state (what???!!??). \n\nLike words, especially slurs, have meanings that cannot be ignored. Your words don't exist in a vacuum they have meaning and intention and pretending other wise is such a slavctivist approach to slur usuage.", "389" ], [ "> is how \"hoho, le bagguette omelette du fromagge\" should be considered equally as racist but isn't.\n\nYou realize french people aren't a race right? That's why that's not considered racist. It's considered STEREOTYPICAL. And surprise, surprise, most people who are also against racist slurs are also against people stereotyping others. I haven't meet many racial activists who are arguing in favor stereotypes. \n\n > Also don't act like there aren't slurs directed at white people or other races. You can call me a honkey ass cracker all you \n\nIf you think being called a 'honkey' or 'cracker' is equivalent to being called a 'n\\*\\*\\*er' or 'f\\*g' you're delusional. <PERSON> and Cracker aren't even considered curse words lmao how you gonna sit here and say they're slurs. There are kids shows who have called people honkey and cracker lmao. Like seriously, you're allowed to say it on 'Everyone Hates Christ' at Nick at Nite are you really gonna act like it's a slur? Lmao get out of here. They aren't even close enough to be in the same solar system as one another. \n\nCan I ask you a question, how many times have you been called a 'cracker' or 'honkey' from a moving vehicle when you in the suburbs or the city? I'd be amazed if was even a single time. \n\nNow go ask some other black people how many times they've been called a 'n\\*\\*\\*er' from a moving car in the burbs or city. I've personally been called 'n\\*\\*\\*er' twice this year in the suburbs by edgy white teens. If only I had called them a honkey in retaliation...", "389" ], [ "> As if white people can't be called crackers, honkeys or other shit.\n\nPretending like 'honky' and 'cracker' is on the same level as 'n\\*\\*\\*er' and 'f\\*g' is the most laughable thing in existence. How often do white people get called 'cracker' or 'honky' out of moving car when they're just tryna walk down the street? Now go ask other black people how many times they've been called 'n\\*\\*\\*er' while walking down the street. Me personally I've been called 'n\\*\\*\\*er' twice while in the suburbs, both by groups of teenage white people driving down the road. \n\n > As if asian people didn't get called chinks, japs or zipper heads.\n\nYes slurs for other races exist in the English language. Guess who invented them? Straight white people.\n\n > The difference is that, at least for the white insults, we just don't give a single fuck.\n\nBecause the words aren't equivalent. Come back to me when there's 300 years of history of calling white people Honky, only referring to white people as 'honky and 'crackers' and only referring to them as that and never their name or their person hood. If you genuinely, truly believe that 'cracker' is as bad of a word as 'n\\*\\*\\*er' you are delusional.\n\n > Thing is some people hear a white dude say nigga or somone say fag out of context and they're ready to go fucking crazy on them.\n\nYeah if a white dude calls a black dude 'nigga' or a straight guy calls someone a 'fag' they should get called out and stepped on because they're calling people slurs like lmao. Surprise, call people slurs and you get shit on for it. Here is a great way to avoid having people be angry at you: DON'T CALL PEOPLE SLURS!!!!\n\nWow!! What if we just... STOPPED CALLING PEOPLE SLURS??! Crazy right, such a radical idea not calling people mean names and instead treating people with respect.", "389" ], [ "> Give it a try next time, they'll remember that moment for the rest of their lives\n\nYeah they'll remember it because it will probably be the one and only time in their life where they actually get called a 'honky' whereas every single black person in america over the age of 10 has had multiple experiences being called a n\\*\\*\\*er. Hell, I was 7 or 8 (3rd grade) when I remember first being called a 'n\\*\\*\\*er' by my friend's racist dad.", "331" ], [ "Lol this just shows your ignorance to the experience of black people in America if you think being called 'n\\*\\*\\*er' isn't a common experience among black children. Especially black children that are in predominately white areas like I was. I literally, and I mean this literally, do not have a single friend that I can think of who hasn't been called the nword multiple times. \n\nFuck, go ask how many black people have had experiences being called 'n\\*\\*\\*er' from people driving. It's disturbingly common how often you'll just be walking down the street minding your business only to have some white folk roll up to you call you a 'n\\*\\*\\*er' and drive away. Seriously, go ask some black folk you know. This is a extremely common experience, especially down south. \n\nIt's a very, very common experience for black children to be called 'n\\*\\*\\*er'. I mean, look at this thread. You have literal full grown adults and late teenagers arguing that it should be acceptable to call others slurs. These people were children at some point. \n\nAnd children really, really like tormenting other children. And what's an easy way to target black children? Call them 'n\\*\\*\\*er'. I would be SHOCKED to learn of a black child who went to public school who WASN'T called the nword while they were enrolled in classes. Absolutely shocked.", "389" ], [ "> So what you are saying is because white people don't get offended by words designed to offend them, the words aren't slurs?\n\nExcept they weren't designed to offend them? Honky comes from the word 'Honky-tonk' which was a style of music that was appealing to white audience members. Fans who would only listen to Honky-Tonk music would be called 'honkys' and since the majority of that audeince was white the word honky correlated to white people with time. [Source](_URL_0_)\n\nCracker is actually a slur that was invented by rich white people in 18th century Americas to call poor whites who worked land. The word was created by white people, to described other, poorer white people. It was never a racial slur to begin with, it was a economic and class slur. [Source](_URL_1_)\n\nWhereas 'n\\*\\*\\*er', 'coon', etc are slurs that literally were invented by white people for the sole purpose of putting black people down and making them 'know their place'.\n\nThat's why they're different. The \"\"\"slurs\"\"\" for white people are often not even slurs, just words that white people don't like being associated with anymore. Whereas the slurs for black people were literally invented for the sole purpose of putting down black people and being slurs. Words like 'n\\*\\*\\*er' would not exist had there not been a need for white people to put black people down. \n\nWords like Cracker and Honky would still exist without racism, 'n\\*\\*\\*er', 'porch monkey' would not exist without racism.", "389" ], [ "> I clearly said \"hear a white dude say nigga or somone say fag out of context\". I never said call someone a nigga or call someone a fag.\n\nThere are only two contexts in which slur usage is okay: in historical words such as literature/movies in order to preserve the thoughts of the time, and when creating new art. In literally any other every day interaction, the usage of slurs is not needed. The reason why someone is gonna get upset when a white guy says 'nigga' or a straight guy says, 'fag' EVEN OUT OF CONTEXT is because those words 99.9999% of the time, don't need to be said to get the message across. Slurs often don't convey any information, they only convey feelings and emotion which is why slurs have the power that they do. What information does someone get when a white guy says the nword? What information do you get when a straight guy calls someone a fag? Nothing at all, at least nothing relevant. \n\nLiterally any conversation can be held without the use of slurs. There isn't a concept on Earth you could not convey without the use of slurs. That is why you shouldn't use them. They convey literally no information, rely on hurting others in the process of conveying no information, and frankly it just makes you look like an uneducated fool who relies on edginess rather than substance. \n\n > I do believe you should be able to call people retards, autists, fags, etc. That shit isn't really that bad and it doesn't have the historical weight that nigger has. They're just used as colorful insults most if not all the times they're used. Idiot and moron used to be colorful insults but language evolves. \n\nExcept using these words as insults does have negative implications. Using 'f\\*g' as an insult for instance associates gay with bad. Same with autist. You're associating autism with someone undesirable, something not good whereas people with autism are 95% of the time just normal people who are a lil socially awkward. \n\nyou really don't see a problem with using 'gay' as an insult or using someone's neurological disorder they already suffer from as a measuring stick for how 'bad' something is? You don't see any problem associating traits people can't change like their sexual orientation or their neurological conditions with bad? You can't see why making people associate autism and gay with something negative is a bad thing?", "389" ], [ "Yes actually they're officially called the Hanzu. Han Chinese people are genetically unique enough to be considered their own race even in greater asia. And since China is 93% Han Chinese people, the the next biggest population at 2% is a genetic derivative of when the Hans invaded southern china and into Korea, it's safe to consider Chinese people their own race even if there's < 5% of people in the country who aren't Hanzu. \n\nBoth are offensive. One is racist because one is targeting a member of a specific race and making offensive gestures. The other is stereotypical because it's relying on french stereotypes to make a joke. Both are offensive. One is racist because it's targeting a race. \n\nI don't know how much more clear it can get. Target a race? Racist. Don't target a race but rely on stereotypes? Stereotypical. It's literally self explanatory.", "255" ], [ "Lmao If they target a race anyone can be racist. \n\nWhat mental gymnastics am I doing? I'm literally just using the definition of the words. Surprise, words have meaning 😲🙀\n\n One is racist because it targets a race, the other is stereotypical because they rely on stereotypes. Or are you upset that words like \"race\" has an actual definition and you can't just call racism cause somome made a joke about French people?", "715" ], [ "That law was created because making it illegal has shown to cause people with HIV to hide their status even more. People like to throw an outrage over this law but the truth of the matter is that by criminalizing HIV in anyway just makes those who are infected less likely to seek out help and less likely to disclose that information to others which just perpetuates the problem.", "418" ], [ "Actually educate yourself on that law and why it was passed. When it was criminalized all that happened was people with HIV not disclosing their status to others, either out of social stigma or out of fear of actual prosecution. The idea behind this law was to remove the stigma and remove people with HIV's fears of being arrested, thus making them more willing to actually disclose their status to others or to seek treatment for it.", "418" ], [ "And the 6th largest economy in the world, the worlds greatest tech companies, one of the world's most competitive argicultural industries, one of the highest quality of life indicators, some of the most aggressive climate change policies, world leading renewable energy sector, the most prosperous state in the entire union....\n\nYou wanna talk tent cities and aids go to the rural midwest lmao. The recent heroin epidemic of the midwest is responsible for one of the largest HIV booms in history. Not to mention the crippling rural poverty that infests the entire region.", "841" ], [ "> Horrible crime\n\n[16th in the nation (and falling fast!) is a 'horrible crime' problem?](_URL_0_) Even though Texas, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, Illinois, and Tennessee and 9 other states all have higher crime rates per capita? \n\nDamn, guess 1/3rd of America has a 'horrible' crime problem. \n\n > horrible drug problems \n\n[I mean California is ranked 37th on the addictive index](_URL_0_) (1st being most addictive), [California only has 5.3 over dose deaths per 100,000](_URL_1_) compared to West Virginia's 49.5 per 100,000, Ohio's 39.2 per 100,000, Kentucky's 27.9 per 100,000, NC 19.8 per 100,000, Maryland's 32.2 per 100,000. \n\nFuck fact, there's actually 32 states in the union with more over dose deaths per 100,000 than California. Guess over half the country has a 'horrible drug problem' too, right? \n\n > artificially inflated economy \n\nOh you mean like all those farming subsidies that fly over states get? You mean subsidies that literally prop up the entire mid west and wouldn't be economically feasible without those subsidies? Is California's economy inflated like theirs? I mean we still have the world's largest, and most successful Tech industry the world's ever seen. Not to mention our energy sector is literally world class. As in, engineers and scientists travel specifically hear to learn about our energy production. \n\n > Homeless problem out of control \n\nOnly because we're the most populated state in the union. When adjusted per capita Texas, New York, Florida all have comparable homelessness rates of right around 1 out of 400 people being homeless. New York actually has a higher homelessness per capita than California. \n\n > California is a shithole \n\nAnd yet, millions of people move here every year while the fly over states die slowly but surely :)", "899" ], [ "> nd as a gay man I have yet to meet another gay dude that cares AT ALL about the word faggot.\n\nYeah I fucking doubt that. Yeah, sure, there are dudebro gay guys out there that don't care about faggot but they are the minority. If you're really gonna tell me that you've never met a gay person that cares about being called faggot you're lying through your teeth.", "640" ], [ "Okay if you're going to criticize California for is ag practices Where's the huge outrage over southern Farmers doing LITERALLY the exact same thing to their water supplies? You know how much water goes into Georgia peaches? Or outrage over Indiana Farmers wasting millions of gallons on soy beans that are now rotting in storage? Or Texan beef industries? They use just as much water as California on food that results in less calories and more methane and carbon production.", "899" ] ]
312
[ 3907, 7516, 20258, 8045, 3029, 22217, 5037, 20332, 25166, 8207, 8896, 23029, 9938, 6272, 11965, 5905, 19951, 1499, 14663, 10614, 19113, 4971, 11688, 4389, 24832, 2134, 15477, 14261, 2545, 23914, 17465, 6335, 22334, 9373, 1254, 8600, 8732, 5076, 7002, 13780, 21782, 17466, 5162, 1884, 22983, 20460, 19165, 12447, 4848, 6503, 9692, 24708, 24948, 16447, 275, 3223, 10785, 2783, 9672, 12579, 22034, 18263, 13354, 17193, 13551, 13416, 2137, 13363, 8619, 24364, 13142, 25154, 6728, 18912, 3988, 24812, 11513, 20191, 9674, 24157, 7593, 12015, 14177, 20098, 15563, 11760, 7543, 11821, 441, 12999, 499, 20828, 3009, 23216, 6023, 14896, 20531, 3510, 8899, 1633, 8554, 2484, 694, 21064, 2743, 1895, 397, 5190, 17759, 10980, 1704, 12107, 7034, 13752, 6095, 13086, 16249, 11431, 12382, 20102, 14964, 1238, 8514, 25205, 12129, 9395, 12361, 8151, 17172, 13838, 17559, 8607, 7047, 21426, 2489, 19916, 9306, 9323, 8590, 9050, 12467, 6841, 14087, 10718, 25195, 23163, 13014, 4797, 1024, 1321, 10661, 10228, 11183, 13284, 13987, 24729, 3042, 17788, 13054, 16810, 8674, 8533, 7036, 11805, 6402, 2362, 3159, 2025, 13348, 16798, 5713, 4897, 660, 10768, 6718, 14744, 16681, 17186, 6277, 6058, 3512, 21183, 3857, 23317, 2240, 13834, 10065, 2105, 5947, 3410, 1045, 2533, 7995, 1650, 23291, 23928, 12034, 21811, 17675, 1352, 3929, 19760, 13358, 1198, 19679, 7778, 25052, 8146, 18042, 15757, 9110, 8114, 13, 17493, 9968, 16936, 15885, 547, 14474, 22360, 1981, 24085, 1834, 8416, 12426, 15869, 4872, 11537, 16152, 10857, 16786, 8136, 11018, 8256, 1700, 15255, 2403, 2916, 22688, 18575, 18898, 20991, 5610, 4171, 22574, 25333, 10707, 1313, 12374, 2895, 5068, 18274, 14118, 10214, 19781, 6452, 19492, 5461, 11441, 14503, 14863, 18349, 2085, 23074, 13256, 20634, 21992, 15909, 4214, 266, 12417, 3501, 1757, 3824, 5411, 12018, 7451, 6973, 10671, 1165, 6427, 22168, 23990, 4889, 12820, 7574, 25544, 10075, 11666, 23977, 13581, 11624, 4851, 6026, 10597, 7695, 21347, 20336, 6187, 2998, 25508, 4133, 23173, 9410, 12090, 5141, 17625, 11066, 4708, 18320, 10063, 2, 22627, 20927, 20858, 13308, 14972, 7824, 11831, 3141, 1531, 13629, 10977, 1479, 3676, 16, 8537, 11758, 24291, 17235, 23901, 12402, 15628, 6465, 11908, 16156, 18455, 6569, 3735, 8558, 16101, 11496, 23715, 25232, 16845, 7807, 13238, 9599, 2583, 9115, 5390, 15555, 20280, 13979, 5661, 19410, 1723, 17507, 15413, 12800, 11692, 19658, 22102, 2537, 12744, 3828, 13092, 5835, 8158, 1245, 8563, 4970, 7325, 12846, 2230, 14649, 18991, 2223, 2774, 19977, 2851, 8305, 1652, 24331, 24771, 10040, 6350, 17352, 10696, 13445, 3316, 12043, 10896, 22053, 21445, 633, 15060, 10110, 22648, 14949, 9724, 5463, 2970, 6608, 12907, 13778, 11762, 12017, 837, 4020, 7609, 13321, 10495, 11902, 4839, 18864, 19592, 14282, 10151, 13122, 19312, 18914, 1555, 22124, 23135, 22242, 24242, 13180, 7710, 18405, 3447, 22635, 14080, 7645, 14819, 20146, 10907, 18175, 17236, 13655, 21400, 8108, 14685, 16309, 17281, 7677, 15009, 361, 21033, 18900, 4324, 11458, 4876, 3985, 13822, 150, 24688, 12617, 19348, 21882, 23856, 13613, 3390, 10328, 7791, 16990, 16288, 12920, 24481, 9051, 16344, 6680, 7757, 6741, 22949, 4783, 21023, 18600, 3721, 11712, 14246, 24577, 1967, 15083, 16244, 1535, 15655, 1126, 22254, 5155, 9389, 11753, 22821, 3815, 10640, 20330, 22884, 10020, 24067 ]
reddit_dump_--ManBearPig--
[ [ "I appreciate you pointing out the DOJ ruling. I learned something new.\n\nNevertheless, it doesn't erase the fact that <PERSON>:\n\n* Had his team meet with the Russians. The prudent course of action was to report the offer to the FBI.\n\n* Tried to obstruct multiple times. The prudent course of action was to let the investigations proceed without interfering.\n\nTo me, these actions show that he's not only a traitor but also an obstructionist. It doesn't matter whether he was slammed with charges or not. The fact remains that he **tried** to break laws. He can't be trusted for that one simple fact.", "776" ], [ "I think the disconnect is that you're focused on charges whereas I'm focused on his actual attempts to break the law. I can't seem to trust someone that tries to break a law even if they ultimately failed to succeed at it (due to ignorance and incompetence) and escaped charges as a result. That doesn't make them nice, sweet, and law abiding citizens suddenly. To you it does despite having proof of the meeting and obstruction attempts.\n\nThe fact that Team <PERSON> tried to do illegal things to begin with tells me all I need to know. They knew better. Instead they sided with Russia and tried to obstruct. These were their choices and they chose badly. It's likely why <PERSON> can't exonerate them.", "860" ], [ "They knew it was wrong without knowing which law they were breaking. Or they likely knew of the law they were breaking but didn't care. After all, they concealed it for 13 months while lying to you about not knowing of Russia's interference. <PERSON>'s argument was that he couldn't prove wilful intent to break the law so he had no case. \n\nNevertheless, the fact that they met with Russia to cheat is a sign of traitors. Then they lied about it. Why keep defending liars and traitors?", "860" ], [ "He said he couldn't charge them because:\n\n* He couldn't prove wilful intent. Meaning they were ignorant of the actual law they were breaking when they were meeting with <PERSON>'s lady.\n\n* <PERSON>'s staff didn't obey his obstruction order.\n\nThey got off because they were stupid and incompetent, basically, despite trying to work with Russia and trying to obstruct. That clears the path for <PERSON> to beg for <PERSON>'s help again on national TV.", "860" ], [ "The subject here is a foreign government's aid to help you beat your campaign rival in a domestic election. Did she receive contributions from foreign governments to help her beat <PERSON>? Did she accept it? Did she set up meetings with them and then lie about not knowing of any foreign interference? No.\n\nTo give you an example of what the right thing to do was: The <PERSON> campaign received the same offer from Russia in 2000. They reported it to the FBI. \n\nThe wrong approach: Team <PERSON> got an offer of contributions from Russia to help beat <PERSON>. Team <PERSON> chose to meet with the Russians, lied to you for 13 months, and ONLY came clean after the NYT got <PERSON> emails.", "860" ], [ "You are a champion of sidestepping the real issues.\n\n* Setting up a meeting with the Russians to get their aid instead of reporting to the FBI.\n\n* Multiple attempts to obstruct justice but only failing because your staff is smarter than you and doesn't carry it out.\n\nBut still 100% noble, good morals, ethical, patriot, and the party of \"law and order\", apparently. Maybe now he can go on national TV again and beg for <PERSON>'s help a second time, because no charges the first time.", "776" ], [ "I can't trust a man that sent his team to meet with the Russians to cheat the election. What he should have done was report the Russian offer to the FBI. \n\nI can't trust a man that tried multiple times to obstruct investigations. What he should have done was let them go uninterrupted.\n\nSure, he didn't get charged because his team was too ignorant of the law and his staff didn't carry out his obstruction orders. That suddenly doesn't mean these are clean people. They tried to break laws and lied about their attempts. How do you support traitors like that? You're suppose to be the party of \"patriots\" and \"law and order\". Will you support him again when he begs for Russia's help on live TV a second time?", "860" ], [ "You should go ask a legal expert, like <PERSON>, the author of the report you're using to try to clear the traitor. It probably has something to do with the fact that <PERSON> tried to obstruct justice multiple times, failing because his staff thought he was stupid and didn't obey the order. \n\nI'm not sure what's worse. Knowing that your leader tried to break the law or knowing that his staff doesn't listen to him.", "693" ], [ "Being innocent doesn't make what he tried to do just go away. He had his staff meet with the Russians when he really should have reported the offer to the FBI. Then he tried to obstruct justice multiple times but only failed because his orders weren't carried out. \n\nYou haven't addressed these two things. I get it, it's hard to defend. No <PERSON> supporter that I came across so far can talk about the meeting and the obstruction orders. They're all just relieved that he was too stupid to get charged. That isn't something to be proud of but here you are.", "776" ], [ "I don't think the left is perfect but I'll ascribe delusion to them when they fall as hard as the right has. \n\nOn the right, conservatives have traded Judeo-Christian values, law and order, patriotism, and their self-respect for the host of The Apprentice. A man that wants to grab married women by the pussy, cheats with porn stars, and pays hush money goes against everything \"family value\" conservatives believe in but he's the hill they've chosen to die on. They are the most delusional of people.", "348" ], [ "Hurling insults now because you have to face <PERSON>'s traitorous actions? I'm sorry you've chosen to defend a traitor, it's not going to be easy. \n\n[Here's <PERSON> email, confirming they took Russia's offer to meet and help them interfere by providing a contribution](_URL_0_) instead of reporting it to the FBI. I am looking forward to them begging for <PERSON>'s help on national TV... again. \"The party of patriots\".", "860" ], [ "You're mistaken. It's actually illegal to take a foreign government's aid for election purposes. That's actually a law.\n\nHillary paid a company who hired an independent contractor (Steele). Both of them were paid for their work. That happens all the time and is legal as long as these contractors aren't associated with a government.\n\n<PERSON> was approached by the Russian government. That should have been reported to the FBI. Instead they took the offer to meet and then met at Trump Tower. Then they lied about it. They ONLY reason they came clean is when the NYT told <PERSON> that they had his emails. <PERSON> rushed to release them in the \"interest of transparency\", lol.", "860" ], [ "Again, I don't worship Democrats. I've called them out on numerous faults.\n\n > but demonizing people who didn't want to vote for either shitty candidate doesn't make you a good person or help anything.\n\nThis is not at all what I'm doing. I'm pointing out how people were triggered into falling for anti-Hillary propaganda by the GOP as well as Russian trolls. Despite nearly two decades of Republican failures, people still equated them with Democrats.", "313" ], [ "I don't think <PERSON> is going to Tweet about every crime at the hands of a Muslim because most aren't high profile enough. For the ones that are, there is a very clear pattern to <PERSON>'s behavior, one that's impossible to not notice. The Toronto van driver ended up being a white guy and not a peep from <PERSON> on that either. His strategy is to divide and conquer by pitting whites against other races.", "614" ], [ "**Republicans:** \"We're going to fuck the middle class any way we can, interfere with investigations of foreign meddling, suppress voters, not punish bad behavior, inflame racial tensions, screw over the environment, and enrich special interest with massive tax breaks.\"\n\n**Democrats:** \"We won't do any of the above\".\n\n**You:** \"I don't see the difference and also Democrats are needlessly demonizing Republicans\".", "313" ], [ "Like I said, he's *inconsistent* when it comes to white shooters. Sometimes he talks, other times he doesn't. He is much more consistent with Muslim perpetrators. He's been hush about the Toronto driver and the Waffle House shooter despite both being high profile cases. Why? If your answer is that \"well he can't Tweet about *everything*\" then shouldn't he just shut the fuck up and not Tweet at all? At least that way he wouldn't look like a bigot, right? I guess if one is a bigot then it's hard to hold it down.", "614" ], [ "Islamic terrorist organizations aren't angry about \"not getting laid\". Often times they form in power vacuums resulting from conflict. Take ISIS for instance which is largely made up of unemployed Sunni governmental workers fired by the <PERSON> administration during the Iraq war. They were recruited by Al-Queda to fight the Americans but went on wanting their own agenda. Extremists in Afghanistan were formed [at an early age](_URL_0_) to help combat the Soviets.", "819" ], [ "What you're saying is that you're ok with getting the short end of the stick. All that happened is that struggling Americans are getting $0 to around $40 per month for 8 years while special interest reaps thousands to millions in savings. Their savings are added to the deficit for you and your kids to pay.\n\nAdditionally, you disregarded the inflation change. Republicans changed it to the Chained CPI method so that the Standard Deduction amounts grow slower over time. You'll end up in higher tax brackets sooner even if you don't see income raises. Your \"only 8 years of great tax savings\" will end up going right back into the system as a result. Congratulations?", "606" ], [ "> The lion's share of the tax burden is paid by \"special interest\" which is why they reap \"thousands to millions in savings.\" When the time comes, it won't be you and your kids paying the bill, it will be those same special interests footing the bill.\n\nSpecial interest is already sitting on massive hoards of wealth. Why did you just gift them even more at your expense? Further, tax cuts for the rich don't trickle down. They didn't trickle down in 1981 under <PERSON>, they didn't trickle down under <PERSON>, and they didn't trickle down for Kansas. So no, they won't foot any bills of any kind if history is any indication. They just wanted to get paid and they got it using Republicans.\n\n > So the cuts are irresponsible because...\n\nYes because the current and next generation gets to pay for gifting a 3-course meal to special interest while the rest of us \"enjoy\" our extra $40/month for just 8 years which gets paid back through an inflation change meant to offset the deficit a little by screwing the middle class. It doesn't have much to do with <PERSON> since we already knew he was a special interest sellout using this bill to enrich himself. The only ones that are surprised by that are his voters. Whether it takes a few years or decades isn't the point. The point is you got a shit sandwich with a proven history of tasting pretty bad and you're trying to sell it as great-tasting.", "143" ], [ "> What kind of logic is this?\n\nWhat you're giving them is tax savings. As a result of the bill, they pay less of their fair share and the difference is made up by you and your kids. You tell me what kind of logic is this? Where those at the top, sitting on massive hoards of wealth, use your politicians to pay less into the system that we all live in? Wasn't <PERSON> holding up special interest during the campaign as the reason for Americans' suffering? Why are you defending them now after berating <PERSON> for giving special interest a speech? Lol.\n\n > This has nothing to do with \"trickle down.\" Interest on the deficit is paid with tax dollars...\n\nTrickle down was a selling point for this bill and special interest have already said they won't trickle it down. As a result, new tax revenues aren't being generated and the deficit is blowing up as of January 2018. Republicans don't give a shit about the deficit after all.\n\n > You do you, but I'm going to take my $40/month for the next 8 years and enjoy it rather than be bitter because my neighbor is getting $400, or because the guy who signed the bill is a big fat meanie pants.\n\nAgain, it's not about <PERSON>. We already knew he was a dudd. It's not about being bitter either from not being rich. It's about special interest groups using corrupt politicians to game the system. It's funny because <PERSON> vowed to \"Drain the Swamp!!\" of these politicians, remember? Or did you already forget? Turns out all Republicans are the swamp.", "612" ], [ "There are two things at play here:\n\n1) Number of terrorist incidents.\n\n2) Number of deaths.\n\nYou're propping up the *number of deaths* because it outnumbers the *number incidents* and suits your narrative. The number of deaths by Muslim terrorists doesn't outnumber deaths by the far-right by that much. From your own link:\n\n > Of those 225 deaths:\n\n > * 106 individuals were killed by far-right violent extremists in 62 separate incidents;\n\n > * 119 individuals were killed by radical Islamist violent extremists in 23 separate incidents;\n\nSo the far-right is responsible for **way** more incidents whereas the number of deaths isn't that far apart. Seems like <PERSON>'s supporters have a problem.", "690" ], [ "> You keep saying that the difference is made up by you and your kids, but that just doesn't make any sense. I'm paying less in taxes...\n\nYou're paying less in taxes today but the thing about these kinds of tax cuts is that they either get reversed or you pay much more for something else. That deficit isn't going to go down on its own. The difference is going to come from you and your kids through a higher cost of living from elsewhere.\n\n > What does \"sitting on massive hoards of wealth\" have to do with anything? What does it even mean? We are talking about income, who cares about wealth?\n\nIt has to do with the lie that this bill is based on. The whole pitch was that this bill would be a job creator by giving special interest extra money to trickle down. The problem obviously is that if they aren't using their hoards of wealth now to create jobs, so why would they create jobs with additional tax savings? \n\n > I love your phrasing that the rich pay less into the system that we all live in. It's so bankrupt of honesty. The rich pay the vast majority of the taxes that support this system that we all live in, and they will continue to do so.\n\nWell now they pay less so by default that's less support going into the system we live in which will be made up by us, or not made up at all leading to who knows what.\n\n > they invest windfalls in operations that grow the bottom line. The \"trickle down\" effect of this bill comes after several years of lower tax burdens, more investment, growth, more jobs, more competition for labor, and higher median wages. Maybe. Possibly. Who knows?\n\nWe know from history that it doesn't work. They had to reverse <PERSON>'s tax cuts in 1982 because it didn't work. Kansas tried it too and went bankrupt. It's not a mystery, especially when special interest [already said they won't trickle it down.](_URL_0_)\n\n > Neither party cares about the deficit when they are in power.\n\nThis isn't a good excuse to continue supporting one of them as they blow up the deficit.", "143" ], [ "Islamic terrorism is largely a result of American foreign policy. Most of the recent attacks resulting from Muslims are from ISIS, a group that <PERSON> indirectly created after invading Iraq. He fired Sunni governmental workers after the invasion whom went on to form the group. Probably shouldn't have done that. \n\nIn terms of number of incidents, far-right nationalists are a much bigger problem and they don't have the excuse of American foreign policy screwing things up.", "690" ], [ "> What? I know the deficit doesn't go down on it's own. It gets paid down. Through taxes. Paid primarily by the rich (i.e. NOT you and your kids).\n\nSo if the wealthy are paying *far less* in taxes now as a result of this bill, how does the deficit go down? Why do you think Republicans changed the inflation metric and made your cuts last only 8 years? Hint: they want you to make up the difference so that their rich donors don't have to.\n\n > Source? The wealthy don't stay wealthy by \"sitting\" on their wealth. They invest it, which spurs growth.\n\nBut if they weren't investing before the bill, why on earth would they invest after the bill? That's why no new tax revenue will be generated to pay down the deficit. I gave you a source earlier that surveyed CEOs stating that most won't invest in anything, defeating the whole purpose of this bill. [Here's another analysis by Goldman Sachs.](_URL_1_)\n\n > Again - when you say \"us\" what you means is \"the wealthy\" and not yourself or myself and probably not our kids either.\n\nWhen I say \"us\", I mean specifically you, me, and the next generation. As in the people that will be making up the difference in the deficit for gifting special interest a 3-course meal with nothing but peanuts for 8 years in return which we pay back thereafter.\n\n > The top marginal rate before Reagans cuts was like 70% or something crazy high - that wasn't reversed. Kansas didn't go bankrupt, in fact their tax revenues rose even though they stupidly reduced the small business tax to 0%....ZERO. How can you take advantage of any growth with a rate of 0%? \n\nThe Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 reversed some of <PERSON>'s cuts because his cuts ballooned the deficit without any benefit. They rescinded some of the marginal tax rate reductions and raised corporate rates, among other things. And the [Kansas tax cuts fell short on every measure they tried to achieve.](_URL_0_)\n\nThis is not hard. You got a very shitty deal at great cost to the deficit. Whatever savings you think you're going to take home will be wiped out in the years after your tax cuts expire and the rich got a permanent and bigger cut. What's worse is you guys went from wanting to fight special interest influence to *fighting for them.*", "264" ], [ "> None of the Islamic terrorists who committed acts on US soil were \"radicalized by the CIA\".\n\nI didn't say that. What I said was that the CIA, either directly or indirectly, created radical groups overseas. Those groups have come back to bite us in the ass. They spawn sympathizers that carry out acts on their behalf. The simple point is that had the West not created these groups in the past, they wouldn't be around today committing terrorism. This is largely a political and foreign policy blunder.", "690" ], [ "The Republican tax bill for the middle class includes:\n\n* A temporary tax cut for 8 years.\n\n* 5% cut at most.\n\n* Change in inflation metric to put you into a higher tax bracket sooner, thus offsetting your tax savings.\n\n* Removal of personal exemptions.\n\nMeanwhile, special interest got a **permanent** cut up to **14%** and aren't affected by the inflation metric change or loss of personal exemptions. Republicans chose a side and yet again it was to boost special interest, the same people <PERSON> vowed to fight.", "606" ], [ "They'll have to plan another one. They don't really have a choice. Every time they nerf artillery, there's a massive drop of arties in battles, down to 0 or 1 per side. Eventually artillery players return to the class or new artillery players move up the lines and it reaches the limit of 3/side again and WG is faced with the same problem.\n\nThe difference is that now it's even more ridiculous. Some genius thought artillery should get Stun so three arties focusing out a small number of tanks is going to keep them perma-Stunned. Good luck firing a single shot if you have an autoloader because your reload becomes absurd when you're stunned. Why WG thinks they owe artillery players anything is stupid. They need to grow a pair and fix or remove this garbage mechanic permanently.", "884" ], [ "> Now it's the left's time to face a probing. \n\nWhere have you been for the last 20+ years while they've been investigating and hounding <PERSON>? Take the hint; the left isn't as dirty as you think. In less than one year, <PERSON> has gotten 4-5 of <PERSON>'s inner circle indicted or pleading guilty, with more indictments on the way. And <PERSON> gave <PERSON> permission to investigate anything he wants.", "776" ], [ "> the American employers baiting and exploiting the least fortunate among us.\n\nThis is precisely why we can't take Republicans seriously on the issue of immigration any further. Republican voters generally hate anyone that's brown, but Republican businessmen *need* brown people. \n\nThis contradiction within the Republican voter base needs to be considered before listening to them speak about the issue.", "612" ], [ "Yes.\n\nThis also begs the question- Will <PERSON> fans find <PERSON> guilty due to an ongoing FBI investigation of <PERSON>? Because they *felt* that <PERSON> was guilty only because she too, was being investigated. \n\nOr will <PERSON> fans perform a set of mental gymnastics instead to spin this positively for <PERSON>?\n\nEdit- Seems like they're bending space-time itself with those mental gymnastics.", "759" ], [ "> Do you really not see the difference? There was proof with <PERSON>. Nothing with <PERSON>.\n\nThis isn't about proof. We all know <PERSON> screwed up and she owned up to it, but the thing is that <PERSON>'s supporters *felt* she was guilty *despite no court conviction* and only because she was being investigated by the FBI. Now that <PERSON> is being investigated by the FBI, they don't feel the same way anymore? Now they want complete resolution before assuming guilt? And the FBI isn't going to disclose a shred of proof in any ongoing investigation. They may or may not have something but neither you nor I know.\n\n > Get your mind right for it.\n\nMy mind is fine. Unlike <PERSON> supporters, I won't assume guilt until the investigation lands a conviction.", "776" ], [ "Any different than the mental gymnastics of\n\n-Love <PERSON> can trust him he's investigating <PERSON>!\n\n-Comey's telling us bad things about <PERSON> death to <PERSON>!\n\n-Yay <PERSON> cost <PERSON> the election because he's secretly a Republican plant in the FBI!\n\n-We can't trust <PERSON> because he's investigating <PERSON> blarg <PERSON>!\n\nIt must suck to be <PERSON>. He's hated by both liberals and conservatives depending on who he has to investigate.", "249" ], [ "<PERSON> going back on his promise to \"Drain the swamp\" isn't really that shocking. Anyone with a functioning brain could predict that he was a sellout to Wall Street. What never fails to amuse me though is how far his fan base goes to convince themselves that they didn't get duped. \n\n*\"He's hiring successful people!\"*\n\n*\"He really meant teacher's unions and bureaucracies!\"*\n\n*\"Look at that 1 year of economic growth he's given us while in office for 2 months!\"*", "27" ], [ "I was pretty upset that she lost, but now I'm glad. We finally can see what a white nationalist government looks like. Full of corruption, racism, no regard for the poor and weak, and about as anti-Christian as one can get.\n\nI can't imagine what would have happened if <PERSON> had won. She would have been powerless with a Republican Congress and the alt-Right Nazis would never shut the fuck up for years. At least now they're on full display and losing whatever credibility they have. \n\nBetter to deal with these Nazis now than later. Good thing <PERSON> isn't our president.", "557" ], [ "There's really nothing wrong with being a proud American as long as you're not a racist, bigoted, misogynistic Nazi. \n\nThe only ones dividing this country are <PERSON> and his fan base. They don't get to slander Mexicans and Muslims and then pretend that they aren't dividing Americans based on race and religion. It doesn't work that way.\n\nThe Hawaiian court ruling that shit on <PERSON>'s immigration ban used his own campaign words against him. It was pure gold.", "227" ], [ "No it didn't. Nowhere in the question did they *specifically exclude* senatorial duties. Prove otherwise. It mentioned the campaign but did not exclude his other duties and asked if he was \"in contact with the Russians\". He said no, which was factually not true.\n\nHere's how a comptent AG would sound like:\n\n\"Did you have contact with the Russians?\"\n\n\"Yes, twice.\"\n\n\"In regards to the campaign?\"\n\n\"No, as my duties as a senator.\"\n\nBoom, done. But that's not how it went.", "860" ], [ "> It must suck losing all the time.\n\nI'm so glad we lost. <PERSON> would have been powerless and <PERSON>'s pro-Russian Nazis would never shut up about conspiracies. With <PERSON> in charge, we can see what a white nationalist government looks like and little by little we're seeing his credibility being chipped away.\n\nKeep trying to downplay how <PERSON> was a \"campaign volunteer\". What's more entertaining than these daily stories is how the <PERSON> brigade keeps trying to put out the fires.", "220" ], [ "And nothing like waking up and clicking on r/Politics and finding <PERSON>'s fan base trying to put out the fires and downplay how much of a sellout he is to the American people. Everyone around <PERSON> seems to be in bed with the Russians but you keep believing he's not influenced? Is it all just a big coincidence in your mind?\n\nKeep up the good fight. You remind me of conservatives when they swore that <PERSON> 2000 was going to be a great leader.", "220" ], [ "> <PERSON> had classified information on a private server\n\nYet despite all that she was cleared of any serious wrong doing and had no guilty conviction but that wasn't enough for the <PERSON> fan base to stop chanting \"Lock her up!\" at rallies.\n\nThe crux of the issue you're not seeing is the fact that <PERSON>'s fan base viewed her as *guilty* solely because she was under FBI investigation and not because of an actual court conviction. Now that <PERSON> is in the same situation, <PERSON>'s fan base doesn't feel the same way. Why? \n\nWhy this double standard? Being investigated by the FBI is the same regardless of who you are. Why accuse one person of being guilty for it, but not another? It's just another example of <PERSON>'s fan base preferring party over country. If they had an ounce of consistency, then they'd accuse <PERSON> of being guilty as well.", "776" ], [ "That doesn't mean much when his credibility is being chipped away as each day passes. Nevermind each day, I can expect to see his corruption, lies, and inability to govern each time I go for a meal each day. \n\n<PERSON> remained in power all eight years but what did that get us in the end? And <PERSON> is making <PERSON> look smart.", "826" ], [ "> The only people \"who would gladly fuck over the American people for personal gain\" are folks on the Left AKA the anti-Trump, SJWs and so on.\n\nI'm actually not seeing this from Democratic politicians. They aren't the ones trying to repeal the ACA, repeal regulations meant to protect the middle class and environment, and hiring special interests straight into the presidential cabinet. Practically everything that is meant to screw over Americans is being done at a fast pace beginning on January 20th this year by the Republicans. Now I know about how corrupt Democrats can be but Republicans' actions speak for themselves.\n\n > You people would LOVE to deport republicans or <PERSON> supporters from America I bet.\n\nThe only people threatening to deport anyone are Republicans. This is the first time I've heard someone claim that Democrats want to deport someone. And no, I don't want to deport Republicans. I want them to do their due diligence and research the issue from non-biased sources rather than listen to Breitbart all day. \n\n > Yet you will riot for the rights of illegal immigrants and refugees to enter the country under the assumption that these foreigners share the same political views.\n\nNot all of us are pro-illegals. We just don't have a solution to deal with the sky rocketing price of produce and other goods if every illegal was rounded up and sent back. Citizens won't do those jobs for anything below minimum wage.\n\nAnd as for refugees, they're our responsibility. We fought a proxy war with Russia within Syria and exasperated that conflict which destroyed their homes. The interesting part is that neither Russia nor America is owning up to it with the brunt of refugees settling elsewhere in the Middle East and Europe. Asking <PERSON> supporters to take in a few thousand out of the 4,000,000+ makes them lose their minds.", "604" ], [ "> I do believe that the left are the only ones dividing the nation by beating people and calling them fascists and racists.\n\nI agree although I do have to point out that <PERSON> *did* bring out the KKK in a lot of people. I'm Muslim and I debated with a few of his supporters here in the last few months and was told that I shouldn't be trusted, be flat out deported, or just killed despite shafting no one. I do think there are leftist SJW's dividing the nation but the alt-right is just as guilty.", "965" ], [ "Just look at the Goldman Sachs hires. He held them up as an example of corruption during the campaign. Shortly after winning, in quite possibly the biggest \"fuck you\" to his supporters, he hires <PERSON> to the National Economic Council. \n\n<PERSON>, Goldman Sachs' second in command. The first thing he wants to do is repeal Dodd-Frank financial regulation, especially the rule that prohibits advisors from acting against the best interests of their clients.\n\nThe spin on this over at T_D was remarkable. You could attach a copper wire to his supporters and sell electricity from that spin.", "915" ], [ "> Sure I could stop supporting <PERSON> if I discovered that he is lying and I see he is failing at his appointed task.\n\nHe lied about draining the swamp. His cabinet is FULL of special interests, the same ones he accused <PERSON> of giving a speech to special interests. Furthermore, he hired <PERSON> from Goldman Sachs. Remember how he held up Goldman Sachs as an example of corruption during his campaign? He hired people from there after he won.\n\nBy your own definition, <PERSON> lied to you when he said he would \"Drain the Swamp\".", "469" ], [ "Five days before the election on November 8th, <PERSON> sent a letter to a congressman saying that they found new emails on <PERSON>. That was a leak, knowing that the congressman would release it to the media to harm <PERSON>'s campaign, which it did. <PERSON> was totally fine with that and didn't ask for leaks to stop.\n\nNow, he's losing his marbles when leaks about him aren't stopping. Each day it gets more and more entertaining.", "452" ], [ "No problem admitting I don't want to click on your link. Last year a <PERSON> supporter was linking a virus to me in a PM. \n\nBack on topic, why can't <PERSON> handle criticism? Why can't he man up and take questions from agencies he doesn't like, like <PERSON> did? Why are Republicans too scared to go to town hall meetings?\n\nSeems like liberals have more balls than Republicans these days.", "800" ], [ "I don't think what <PERSON> did there was right but he didn't bar any news outlets from attending. Fox could still take notes and share the details of those press conferences and add whatever bias they wanted for their viewers.\n\nIn <PERSON>'s case, however, they aren't even allowed to *be* there. That means that <PERSON> and his favorite news outlets can push whatever angle on their agenda they desire.\n\nYou don't find that dangerous? What makes you think that Democrats won't use the same tactic in the future?", "6" ], [ "The links won't teach me anything that I don't know, which is that every news outlet [including CNN] has its fair share of bias and screw ups. \n\nWhat I'm asking is evidence of instances where CNN was caught making news up. <PERSON> and Republicans have already been caught three times. Once with that incident in Sweden that never happened, Bowling Green massacre that never happened, and a third one somewhere.\n\nAnd don't forget Pizza Gate. They led one of your friends to go and shoot up the place based on non-existent information.", "840" ], [ "> This ship has lurched so far to the left, that the only recourse for those opposed to that view is to lurch over to the right.\n\nFortunately enough moderates and independents are coming back to the Left after seeing what the Right is *really* about. They want no part in this fascism. \n\n > You have brought this upon yourselves.\n\nHow is that? <PERSON> tried to give affordable health care and strengthen middle class and environmental protections. All he ever got from the Right and their corporate elites was obstruction. \n\nSorry but don't blame this on the left. We didn't create <PERSON>, your side did. Republicans kept their voter base in a state of fear and misinformation for years, swearing up and down that <PERSON> would destroy the country. They were wrong but they created ripe conditions for the rise of your current fascist leaders.", "965" ], [ "I think that should be up to the woman to decide, not us. I do find late stage abortions very bad and my own religion forbids it but ultimately it's not my body and not my choice. Plus, I don't know their circumstances either for wanting an abortion. \n\nIn order to prevent those kinds of abortions, I think people should have wider access to contraceptives. The problem is that Republicans believe that sex is solely for procreation and are using their religious values to ban contraceptives.\n\nSo the point that I'm making is that if Republicans want to ban abortion and want to use the power of government, then they should stop calling themselves the party of individual freedom and liberty. They are not supporting \"small government\".", "674" ], [ "> No one cares anymore and has already moved on.\n\n<PERSON> hasn't moved on. They're actively trying discredit the story. Something is still up.\n\nAlso, what I find interesting is that his supporters are claiming innocence while he's being investigated by the FBI. Do you remember what his supporters thought about <PERSON> when she was being investigated by the FBI? Guilty.\n\nIt's fascinating how they apply two ways of thought to the same scenario.", "776" ], [ "<PERSON> is not that sophisticated. All his voters did was elect the host of The Apprentice and now instead of acting like a president, he's acting like the host of The Apprentice. Everyone told him not to move this embassy as it would be a jab to the Palestinians. He did it anyways and 50+ of them were gunned down with another 2,000+ injured. Expert deal maker you have there. Take a shit situation and figure out how to make it much much worse.", "308" ], [ "All you're doing is trying to put lipstick on a pig. <PERSON> was warned that moving the embassy would cause protests and violence, yet he did it anyways. He's fishing around for an attack on the US or even a war to help out his ratings. It worked well for <PERSON>, why not him? You don't try to make peace with the Palestinians by jabbing them in the eye with a sharp stick. Move the embassy, cause protests and fighting, keep the chaos going. <PERSON>, just like his predecessors, now has blood on his hands and isn't any different. It's odd that the instigators and ones that gun down protestors are always playing the victim card.", "308" ], [ "Remove Stun and keep the rest of the artillery nerfs in place or better just remove the trashy mechanic from pubs. Sorry but this game doesn't owe artillery players **anything**. We launch the game to play tanks, not to be randomly whacked from above for choosing to push up. WG needs to grow a pair and kill off this cancer.", "427" ], [ "That's not a surprise. Russia can't beat us militarily. They're behind by far too much, only have one aircraft carrier which leaks and gets tugged around, and have no hope of catching up.\n\nBest way to ruin America? Trigger conservatives enough to make them monkey-out at the polls and elect the host of **The Apprentice**, who ends up acting like... the host of The Apprentice. Watch as Republicans erode the country from the inside out through lies, cheating, corruption, and scandals and erase a century of progress and alliances. \n\nRussians have effectively turned conservatives against their own country and made them turn American values upside-down. All for the cost of paying Russian trolls $20/week to make dank memes.", "853" ], [ "Some of them might be book smart but they don't have enough street smarts to detect an obvious conman. They were the ones trying to claim credit for <PERSON> for NK-SK, despite <PERSON> doing nothing about that other than calling <PERSON> \"rocket man\". Now he's being shat all over by NK. Sorry but these people are not smart. And they have no regard for the law considering they're ok with <PERSON> firing the people investigating him and calling it a witch hunt against him. But investigating <PERSON> for 20+ years and having nothing to show for it wasn't a witch hunt? Please. These people need to take off their partisan blinders.\n\nNow his signature Israeli-Palestinian solution starts off with triggering a protest and leading to the deaths of 50+ individuals and the wounding of 2,000+ others. This guy is as bad as we said he would be back in 2016.", "686" ], [ "<PERSON> winning the election is turning out to be more and more of a blessing in disguise. There is no way <PERSON> could have devastated the GOP this hard. The right's casualties of <PERSON>'s win, off the top of my head:\n\n* 40+ losses of special elections by the GOP.\n\n* Numerous Republican careers destroyed by trusting <PERSON>.\n\n* Numerous indictments and guilty pleas of <PERSON>'s inner circle.\n\n* Numerous Republicans resigning and fleeing from Congress.\n\n* The GOP's reputation for upholding the law is shattered.\n\n* Now the NRA embroiled in traitorous treachery.\n\nIt keeps getting better as the days go by. His supporters have their work cut out in putting out the fires.", "800" ], [ "As a percent of ALL web traffic doesn't mean anything. This propaganda was specifically targeted on voters in *key swing states*. The content was specific and the audience was narrow. You don't need to spam the internet. They identified the most susceptible voters (conservatives) using data analysis at Cambridge Analytica from user information provided by social media.\n\nThis is much more complex than you think. In the end and despite all the help he received from Russia, <PERSON> only won by a meager **70,000** votes. Today he's lost far more supporters than that. I'm not sure if relying on Russia to win and then barely winning is something to be proud of.", "92" ], [ "The point of the ads was to sow chaos and instigate hatred for the other side. The bulk of the ads were along racial themes painting blacks, Muslims, and Mexicans in a bad light and to solidify support for <PERSON>. Ads targeting independents manipulated them into staying home rather than voting for <PERSON>. It worked just enough for <PERSON> to win by razor thing margins in only three swing states.\n\n<PERSON> is affiliated with the Russian government, something your side denied until it surfaced as truth recently. She got into a room with the <PERSON> campaign where they sought dirt from her on <PERSON>. Didn't your side tell you they didn't know anything about collusion? I guess they lied to you because they got caught trying to collude.\n\n > the storm is coming.\n\nRepublicans lost 40+ special elections under <PERSON>, had numerous Republican careers destroyed, several of <PERSON>'s inner circle indicted, and are resigning from Congress in droves. You're in the storm right now.", "860" ], [ "They likely violated 11 CFR 110.20 which states:\n\n*(b)Contributions and donations by foreign nationals in connection with elections. A foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly, make a contribution or a donation of money or other thing of value, or expressly or impliedly promise to make a contribution or a donation, in connection with any Federal, State, or local election.*\n\nThey met with a representative of a hostile foreign government seeking to undermine our election. The material being legal or illegal is irrelevant. The fact that they met at all is why they lied to you about it. They weren't suppose to receive aid from foreign nationals.", "210" ], [ "I didn't say we elect by popular vote. Go back and re-read if you really need to. I pointed out your error on how you thought only Americans decided to elect <PERSON>. He was desirable by <PERSON> and by the electoral college voters in the key swing states where <PERSON> focused his propaganda. \nEven the <PERSON> agree with me. They even met with <PERSON>'s representative to help him undermine our election. Try to keep up.", "92" ], [ "I don't think it's feasible to ask every single swing state voter what influenced their decision. What we do know is that Americans shared and liked Russian propaganda millions of times. In addition to supporting <PERSON>, the ads targeted far left voters to vote <PERSON> (instead of <PERSON>), and it targeted independents to stay home instead of traditionally voting Democrat. \n\nThis election was abnormal. You had <PERSON> only campaigning in the critical swing states after meeting <PERSON>. The GOP had a 20+ year smear campaign on <PERSON>. <PERSON> re-opened the investigation into <PERSON> days before voting. Russia was spamming propaganda. When the dust settled, the host of The Apprentice was our president only because of 70,000 voters.", "169" ], [ "You would be right except for the fact that <PERSON>'s probe has already led to guilty pleas and indictments of <PERSON>'s inner circle, with more on the way. Plus there's the Senate's report from yesterday confirming Russia's efforts to elect <PERSON>. Unlike the <PERSON> witch hunt, there's *actual progress* against the <PERSON>. \n\nI'm not sure why you're ok with being lied to though. The <PERSON> said they didn't know anything of Russian interference to help them, and then get caught meeting with Russia's representative at their tower.", "860" ], [ "> Overall, America made the right choice...\n\nNo they didn't. The man promised to fight corruption but he's hiring elite CEOs to his cabinet. He hired five people straight out of Goldman Sachs, the company that screwed America less than a decade ago. That is a slap to the face of every last American man, woman, and child. He flat out lied about locking up <PERSON> too. \n\nOn top of that he has no political experience and was caught on tape saying nasty things about women. The fact that he won is a sign of how far many Americans have fallen.", "27" ], [ "> Lol <PERSON>\n\nWhy can't you guys defend <PERSON> without deflecting to a different point of reference? Is it because <PERSON> is so bad that he's indefensible on his own? \n\nBut to address your thing about <PERSON>, no, she wouldn't put criminals like Goldman Sachs in her cabinet. Yes she has special interests funding her which is bad but not out of the ordinary. Politicians in both parties do this. The difference is that she gave a speech to Wall Street while <PERSON> is hiring straight from Wall Street. He essentially looked every American in the eye and said, \"See these <PERSON>** criminals that fucked the economy in the 2000s? Remember how I said Drain the Swamp? Well instead of punishing them I'm going to give them jobs in my cabinet\". Sorry but you got duped really hard. He's bypassing the corrupt politician and hiring straight from corporate America.\n\n > The stupid stuff he said about women 10 years ago is not even a big deal. I'm sorry, but lots of men talk like that when they're hanging out.\n\nYou can't downplay that no matter how hard you try. He was in his 60s 10 years ago when he said that so there is no excuse. The man is morally bankrupt and if he can't keep his commitment to his personal morals then I can't expect him to keep his commitments to Americans. And I don't know what kind of men you hang out with but I certainly don't say that crap and nor do the men in my family or circle of friends. \n\n > “I did try and fuck her. She was married… I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn't get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she's not got the big phony tits and everything... I've got to use some Tic Tacs, just in case I start kissing her. You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful. I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.”\n\nThat is the turd you essentially voted for.\n\n > He raised good daughters and he is proud of them.\n\nHe said his daughter was a good piece of ass.", "504" ], [ "> You can hate <PERSON> all you want but the fact still stands that people only had these two options\n\nI do think <PERSON> had a level of corruption but she would have been a continuation of <PERSON>'s policies. Policies that brought us out of a recession and gave us a more or less stable government. The last time we had a fully Republican controlled government we were dragged into two wars and a recession. Republicans are the scum of the earth and cater to corporate America *far more* than Democrats do. They also see us Muslims as sworn enemies when we're not. \n\nThese elite billionaires that <PERSON> is hiring on to his team have *nothing* in common with the middle class. Who do you think they're going to serve exactly? Themselves and their shareholders or the rural American living in a dumpster fire? All these people he's hiring are there to dismantle departments and regulations to help the elite succeed at the expense of the middle class. Regulations protect us and keep businesses in line but he's rapidly doing away with them. \n\n > But he was a risk worth taking.\n\nNo it isn't. If you let a fox in the hen house and he fucks up the hen house, you **don't** let the fox back in. <PERSON> let the fox back in. You're essentially agreeing with me based on past history but expecting a different result. How is that even logical?\n\n > Besides, I'm going to judge him after his first 100 days. Let's see what he does.\n\nFor a bit I felt the same way until he went back on locking up <PERSON> and hiring straight out of Wall Street. You can keep waiting to see if he serves the people but most people already know who he's serving. A billionaire TV celebrity that lives in a NY tower with his name on it in gold lettering was **never** a man of the people.", "533" ], [ "The ACA is not a charity program. It's an insurance program that we all pay in to and use when we need it. Just because you don't need it now doesn't mean your money is wasted. It goes to help others and the coverage is there for you to use when needed. The money is better distributed, handled, and used to actually give medical care to those that need it.\n\n<PERSON> and his army of red hat clowns are just in it for themselves. They're happy to save a couple hundred dollars and let their fellow Americans die of pre-existing conditions. Sad.", "56" ], [ "Not only that, here's what won over the Christian vote:\n\n > “I did try and fuck her. She was married… I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn't get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she's not got the big phony tits and everything... I've got to use some Tic Tacs, just in case I start kissing her. You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful. I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.”", "581" ], [ "It isn't anywhere near 70-90% and no that wouldn't be fair IMO. You have to look at the current state of affairs though and realize that whatever we have right now isn't working. You think that the rich are being treated unfairly but the rich have never been richer. The wealth gap is at the highest it's ever been in the history of the country and world with just around 12 or so people owning 1/2 of the world's wealth while people are barely getting by. <PERSON> and Republicans' tax cuts may help me but they do nothing to solve the problem and only exasperate it.", "143" ], [ "My parents had the same deal. Met each other the day of their wedding. It worked out for them and a lot of their peers. Love happens during the marriage rather than before the wedding.\n\nIf you think about it, there is a bit of excitement in starting to learn about your partner on your wedding day and forward. Of course you need to ensure some basic compatibility first but the bulk of the adventure begins on the wedding day.", "429" ], [ "Only if there was some basic compatibility in place. In this day and age, arranged marriages are still a thing but you have time to get to know the other person and you can accept or decline if you don't like what you see. You just can't do anything physical together but you can meet up to talk and see if there's some compatibility. You save all the love and physical contact for after the wedding which does make your marriage a little more fun.", "429" ], [ "I don't think you understood what I said. I'm not referring to <PERSON> being the fox. I'm referring to Goldman Sachs and other CEOs that <PERSON> is hiring to be the foxes. They had a hand in how things went down a few years ago with the recession and now <PERSON> is giving them the keys to the country's economy and you all think we're going to get a different result. These people should be in jail, not in a Presidential cabinet. \n\nIt's one thing to say \"Drain the Swamp\" of corruption and the wholesale sellout of America but it's a completely different thing to give jobs *directly to* special interest groups. But that's not as bad as <PERSON> giving a speech once somewhere.", "27" ], [ "You could see it coming from miles. Republicans have a history of catering to corporate America and industry. That's generally a good thing but not when it's at the expense of the people. <PERSON> did it during his terms to help the defense, oil, construction, and finance industries and it completely fucked us. <PERSON> and his team of elite CEOs might not take us into another war [or maybe they will, who really knows] but the middle class and poor rural Americans are of **no** concern to billionaires. Their deregulation will help them consolidate wealth much more at our expense.\n\nWhat was your reason for voting <PERSON>? I'm curious.", "612" ], [ "I see. I don't think that gamble paid off in my opinion. I also don't think much bad will happen to Muslims. It was just a way of making racists and bigots feel good and voting for him. It worked.\n\n > If for <PERSON> it will be the relatively the same, just an continuation/extension of <PERSON>'s. \n\nThis is why I voted for <PERSON>. The <PERSON> administration gave us stability and a decent economy and <PERSON> would have continued it.", "533" ], [ "Well I'm not a Communist and I believe in the free market and that people should pay their fair share. Liberals aren't advocating for Communism. \n\nThe problem with less government programs is that you leave your poor and middle class vulnerable and unprotected. A weaker middle class means a weaker economy because people don't have money to spend. \n\nThe tax cuts that <PERSON> is going to implement only help those at the top. Yea it might save me a couple thousand at my level but the people that really need help aren't going to get any by saving only a couple hundred dollars per year. The elite, however, will save millions and invest none of it back into the economy. That's who Republicans help with tax cuts.", "612" ], [ "Elites aren't a charity organization that are going to create more jobs when existing work and productivity are already being done. Why should they if they don't need to? A lot of them offshore their money to avoid taxation or save it up where it does nothing for the economy.\n\nPoor and middle class people take free money and spend it right away. We are bad at saving and investing but we'll buy a new flat screen TV or a pair of shoes or a piece of furniture. Essentially we give the economy a shot in the arm with any kind of tax break.\n\nI don't think elites are being taxed unfairly right now. Like I said, the concentration of wealth has never been higher in the history of the world. Elites control more wealth than a lot of nations combined. They're doing just fine and consolidating more as we speak.", "143" ], [ "> But hey, have we ever considered that just maybe these wealthy people, heads of industry, actually are the most experienced and most qualified for the jobs?\n\nI think they have experience. Let's be real here though, they aren't going to use that experience to help the middle class or the poor rural Americans that voted <PERSON> in on the promise of draining the swamp. These people are in it to deregulate the government so that they can enrich themselves further.\n\nWant to know why I believe that? You probably weren't around in 2008 or were too young but companies like **Goldman Sachs** fucked the American economy so hard that people are still recovering from it. <PERSON> essentially took those criminals and gave them jobs. Sorry but you got duped excessively hard.", "612" ], [ "There's nothing awkward about calling a bunch of red hat wearing circus clowns stupid. They got duped. <PERSON> promised to drain the swamp and he's filling it with diarrhea. \n\nIf hiring Goldman Sachs people isn't the biggest fuck you to every American man, woman, and child, then I don't know what is. Those people belong in jail for what they did to the economy in 2008.", "941" ], [ "> however, as companies of that size often behave as singular, autonomous entities, looking out for their own well being. \n\nAnd this is why we shouldn't allow them anywhere near having control of the nation's economy.\n\n > As for these officials helping themselves only or being good for the poor/middle classes, I think it remains to be seen what they will do and we can't be sure of anything just yet.\n\nMy guess based on past experience is that they'll help themselves. If they really wanted to help the poor and middle class then they would pass regulations [the ones repealed in the 90s] on themselves. Both you and I know the likelihood of that happening though.\n\n > Yes, the conflicts of interest are there, but so is an unusually conscious public that will be watching their every move.\n\nThat's all we can do; watch while they fuck over the economy *again*. Short of that we can't really stop them until 2020.\n\n > Well, I voted green and have always hated <PERSON> so I don't believe I was duped. \n\nI'm generally for voting independent but this wasn't the election to do it in.", "23" ], [ "> We aren't letting the companies in charge of our economy, though. We're letting individuals who used to work for those monstrosities sit in cabinet positions to advise the president over his regulation of the industries they USED to work in. \n\nThe fact that they worked in those industries in the past is enough to keep them out. These people were leading those industries when they fucked the American economy. You don't reward failure with cabinet jobs. Simply put, they can't be trusted. They fought regulations then and they won't help to regulate their friends in the industry now. \n\n > Who better to know what to regulate? We must simply prevent them from abusing it. \n\nBut they won't regulate, that's the problem. Look at <PERSON>'s actions right now. He's deregulating everything he can. Republicans are known for deregulation. He's assigning people to agencies to dismantle them and make it easier for corporate America to further enrich itself at our expense. \n\n > We can watch and object if they do illegal things. We can vote our representatives out of office if they don't do anything to stop it. Same as any other presidency. \n\nI think the damage will be done by 2020. We can slow it down in 2018 if we can win back control of Congress but we're largely powerless until 2020.\n\n > If this wasn't the election in which to vote independent, then there never was one. Both major candidates were awful and yet people still voted for them just to prevent the other side from taking office. I'm not voting for someone I hate just so someone else I hate more won't take office. \n\nThat is of course your right but I don't think <PERSON> was that bad. She was your typical politician that had her character assassinated by years of investigations that proved nothing and landed no convictions. People were taught to hate her without knowing why exactly. Now we have <PERSON>.", "23" ] ]
95
[ 23820, 10483, 3828, 633, 7543, 12382, 19165, 5931, 6277, 4609, 16540, 18914, 11837, 9051, 18477, 10874, 12920, 5572, 14598, 14139, 13454, 18, 23571, 3501, 4529, 1729, 5142, 13157, 16073, 18059, 18400, 12038, 6187, 20316, 13179, 22419, 23163, 61, 20991, 7402, 8732, 15092, 3850, 6397, 2633, 2225, 23826, 7622, 23629, 6415, 15200, 5076, 24708, 11317, 17672, 20038, 16189, 639, 10416, 12136, 8627, 22567, 2105, 24211, 24314, 14949, 19567, 3785, 14948, 9486, 6256, 19553, 3967, 23216, 6272, 18681, 441, 22393, 23565, 22334, 361, 23093, 20451, 13238, 15009, 21648, 24771, 6157, 16447, 24593, 12691, 1499, 13655, 275, 16744, 8838, 22816, 20970, 19740, 11821, 7904, 25322, 11141, 4910, 24948, 3735, 15006, 16047, 5713, 3742, 18692, 9373, 6877, 22814, 408, 7909, 19312, 3721, 11790, 12877, 6503, 18807, 15823, 5073, 6335, 11688, 11302, 6026, 8851, 2583, 2351, 5162, 22515, 18831, 10837, 2403, 13411, 22217, 16182, 6361, 10063, 2148, 3748, 12119, 6644, 21038, 5968, 9287, 14087, 19559, 21426, 1462, 7051, 11805, 23053, 14164, 21742, 16607, 2935, 22149, 13851, 23579, 19389, 12517, 15238, 13608, 6402, 95, 12783, 7613, 9419, 1237, 18787, 14791, 12413, 8384, 10797, 24734, 15915, 20256, 14821, 25268, 12128, 19433, 4163, 21420, 2970, 16102, 13573, 21932, 9306, 9323, 15409, 25066, 17818, 4876, 11845, 2606, 8540, 5946, 10744, 23806, 20858, 19095, 20280, 19425, 25049, 8674, 5500, 18455, 9913, 5651, 24083, 3197, 11458, 18215, 21229, 25508, 4699, 20460, 22476, 10082, 14508, 7495, 1496, 24693, 21751, 12894, 18175, 4132, 18061, 13398, 16786, 12800, 22798, 21099, 18390, 2651, 14226, 13142, 22086, 8806, 14275, 23700, 25205, 17821, 18301, 18393, 19114, 1024, 17584, 2249, 598, 22648, 12744, 10185, 5561, 20988, 12417, 15477, 1079, 3591, 7695, 18387, 15255, 19223, 11831, 22176, 20330, 15973, 367, 2983, 2851, 11398, 23124, 16724, 5216, 9938, 13904, 23188, 752, 25134, 22565, 1990, 4248, 19339, 19945, 1884, 9717, 13416, 1678, 16584, 16033, 1757, 9115, 12059, 20145, 24284, 25404, 9367, 6262, 22506, 10720, 7629, 9672, 3009, 22424, 18819, 23803, 8108, 19691, 8742, 5045, 16173, 2137, 22613, 11646, 9861, 19639, 14675, 3997, 1229, 22411, 6452, 1254, 15615, 17466, 15931, 13630, 12990, 19789, 2300, 16134, 12448, 2960, 25124, 18562, 20368, 5411, 19526, 22124, 15076, 8764, 6961, 6833, 22347, 24942, 6235, 16286, 6741, 7946, 23388, 22924, 22830, 10664, 7364, 19256, 25522, 10759, 4589, 25099, 20823, 15259, 9110, 4670, 21005, 1192, 6595, 12793, 8558, 14466, 22684, 4813, 10977, 1560, 9841, 17256, 15251, 20279, 8351, 11431, 24844, 19951, 10077, 19410, 21375, 21120, 13635, 8980, 19429, 15555, 5939, 2700, 11133, 11822, 22886, 2545, 22688, 23358, 13822, 12907, 17950, 8683, 15653, 21674, 11052, 6083, 17881, 15922, 13722, 6432, 460, 16411, 19909, 8817, 13752, 19043, 5555, 9264, 8134, 19687, 432, 7037, 19916, 499, 22504, 184, 10868, 3988, 83, 11571, 24989, 6465, 1478, 15885, 25385, 23482, 12112, 21395, 23685, 21924, 11463, 16510, 18230, 14448, 12479, 17210, 7685, 15535, 19966, 7069, 10328, 14885, 7883, 7034, 24120, 2743, 23977, 2223, 1723, 12308, 13780, 18469, 17610, 4708, 22519, 12361, 24093, 12264, 25195, 4234, 16344, 19850, 2345, 15346, 50, 13698, 10813, 11412, 11948, 14555, 13184, 24075, 7609, 12984, 1203, 23735, 22366, 10402, 1878, 4056, 4797, 16960, 20342, 1535, 4224, 14896, 12182, 6303 ]
reddit_dump_--Ty--
[ [ "Oh my goooddddddddddd THIS IS AMAZING\n\nJust finally having a sense of relative measure between these is SO useful. Imagine my surprise when the metropolitan ends up having one of the most narrow grips! In all of its photos, it looks super chunky! Now i can see why so many people here said it was not that bad.\n\nAnd yeah, right now, my current short-list is the Platinum Plaisir (so, basically just the preppy but with a metal body), the Kaweco Sport, the Hongdian Forest, and the Platinum Meteor (again basically the preppy), based solely on the colour. I took the photos of all the pens I've looked at, and cut out a little swatch of their colour, and showed it to my friend so that she could tell me what she liked most, without having an idea of what the gift is :P\n\nHow do you feel about the preppy? The grip is more or less the same on the whole lineup of Platinum pens, and the nibs are the same too, so how do you find it writes?", "75" ], [ "On my other copy of this post, on the dentistry subreddit, every single person who commented on baking soda said to avoid it, all citing the same damage caused from its abrasiveness.\n\nI can totally understand the idea of \"well it cleans my dishes, surely it will clean my teeth\", but the thing we all forget is that our teeth ***are not made of stainless steel having food baked on at 400 degrees***.", "642" ], [ "Gargling actually doesn't expose any part of your mouth to the fluid -- its all in your throat when you gargle. Just swish it around inside your mouth. \n\nBut also, ***NO***. Christ no, you might as well clean your mouth with bleach. This sort of advice comes from people who just thing bacteria of any kind = bad, not realizing that the only reason we're ***alive*** is because of the bacteria keeping us alive in our bodies. \n\nYes, there are harmful bacteria that cause cavities. There are also helpful ones that heal mouth damage. Hydrogen peroxide doesn't distinguish between these -- it just kills everything. Mouthwash obviously does the same, but is fortified with fluoride and other things to help offset that, and can be useful in certain cases.", "229" ], [ "Not a dental professional, but after browsing the dentistry subreddit, I came across some discussions on abrasive toothpastes and the like, and you should take a look at [This Chart](_URL_0_). Pretty much every dentist in the forum said to avoid anything that's more abrasive than midway through the green section. You'll also note that pastes in the red section are actually considered to be actively harmful to the teeth. Close Up with Baking Soda is halfway through the yellow section -- It's just far too abrasive.", "642" ], [ "If you're doing that, it just means you're brushing ***far*** too hard. You're almost certainly scarring your gums and wearing micro-fissures into your enamel. You need to just focus your mind on being more gentle when you brush. A typical ***Soft-bristled*** brush head should last you 3-4 months. You should not use anything more stiff than soft bristles. \n\nAn electric toothbrush will probably help you, though, simply because you don't need to do any brushing motion at all when using one. You just hold it against your teeth and let its movement do the cleaning for you, taking care to reach all the different parts and sides of your mouth and teeth.\n\nI would personally recommend that, when you buy an electric toothbrush, you bring it with you to your dentist and ask them to show you how to use it properly. If you're still holding it too forcefully against your teeth, it will do damage.", "648" ], [ "No idea why this is being downvoted, it's a valid question.\n\nThe real answer though, is that regardless of whether its good or bad, what it certainly is is ***useless***. Charcoal does not work the way people think it does, and the way marketing teams want people to think it does. What it can do, if implemented incorrectly, though, is act as an abrasive, and damage your teeth. As such, I would recommend you avoid it, along with any whitening toothpaste, [which are far TOO abrasive](_URL_0_).", "304" ], [ "I don't know why your comment is being downvoted without explanation. \n\nFrom what I could find online, though, it appears that Pardontax is exactly the same as any other decent toothpaste like Colgate Total, with the same set of active ingredients. If you hate the taste, id recommend switching to something you like. Enjoying the activity will make you far more likely to brush for longer, and more often, and that will make a far larger difference than the toothpaste you use.", "1015" ], [ "I like your analogy, but nah it's nothing like that. Its simply that the work bacteria do to drill into your enamel takes time. Like, a lot of time. Its enzymatic and chemical reactions that break down the enamel, and if you're wiping these biofilms (bacterial masses, AKA. tartar) off your teeth each day, you're doing 95% of what's needed to avoid cavities, as the bacteria simply don't have the time to \"set up shop\", as it were. \n\nThe spaces IN BETWEEN your teeth, however... well they simply don't get reached by a toothbrush. So, if you're only brushing your teeth, you're leaving all the bacteria between them there to just work away. They can set up shop, get to work, and destroy your enamel a little bit each second, minute after minute, hour after hour, day after day, because you're never removing them.\n\nIt's like if police only ever patrolled major roads. Would that eliminate all crime? Of course not, the criminals would simply move to and harass the areas that AREN'T being patrolled.\n\nThis is why most cavities start between the teeth -- that's just where the bacteria are the most protected, and can do their work undisturbed.", "833" ], [ "The idea that baking soda would neutralize an acidic mouth over the long term is just... what?\n\nYeah, it'll neutralize it of course..... for like... ten minutes, until your mouth secretes more of the acidic compounds in your saliva?\n\nIf you don't mind me asking, can you expand on how a mouth guard makes your jaw hurt? Grinding your teeth is something you really can't overlook.", "346" ], [ "Haahaha, I mean... all of her current pens are rather Kawaii, but i guess that's just because the only place to get 0.3mm pens in the west is from asian import stores, and that tends to be their whole aesthetic. \n\nI just don't want to come across as a condescending guy getting her a pen that looks like its for a child, when she's going into a medical program like dentistry, ya know?\n\nBut WHOA, i never knew the Kaweco Sport was a screw-cap! No one else ever mentioned that on any of the reviews/documentation I've read, thank you for pointing that out, that's huge! \n\nAnd yeah I'm trying to find something reasonably affordable so that I can get her a paper pad and a nice ink :)\n\nThank you for your comment, very useful!", "75" ], [ "If you're open to one other suggestion, grab a thin piece of solid stock, bend it a bit, and weld it to the side of the table so you have a [Convenient Place to Store your Angle Grinder](_URL_1_) when you need both hands. You can add another peg for your hearing protectors, maybe a wrench, etc. Won't take you more than a minute, but my god is it useful. I'm constantly dropping shit when I have to work on my little tables and am trying to move stuff around. [You can also make a fancier version.](_URL_0_)", "473" ], [ "Hello everyone,\n\nI've had a question about mechanical keyboards for ***years*** now, and it's in regard to their ergonomics.\n\nMechanical keyboards are supposed to be a typing experience that is ***better than*** standard membrane keyboards. Everything from the packaging, to the aesthetics, to the price reflects this supposed increase in quality.\n\nExcept... for ergonomics.\n\nI just don't understand how and why mechanical keyboards are designed without any wrist support, or at very high elevations off the table surface, or without ergonomic shaping.\n\nI mean, [some mechanical keyboards are so thick](_URL_2_), your wrists would have to be under like 25 degrees of extension just to use them. And [even many of the thinner mechanical keyboards](_URL_1_) come without any feathering/tapering of the front edge, so you're left with a sudden 1/2\" drop to the desk surface. \n\nWhy is it that even a [cheapo office keyboard comes with a wrist support](_URL_0_), but multi-hundred-dollar mechanical ones don't? \n\nI know there are exceptions, like the Corsair series, but I don't get why its such a common thing for the industry. ***Is there an unspoken understanding that the people who buy mechanical keyboards are also the type to buy aftermarket wrist rests?*** Because even if that assumption is being made, detached wrist supports are ALWAYS more annoying than integrated ones. \n\nSo can anyone explain why the mechanical keyboard industry seems to have taken a collective step backwards from the progress that has been made towards ergonomics? And what can I do about it, in terms of finding a well-made, ***ergonomic*** mechanical keyboard?", "742" ], [ "SOME of the 65% boards will provide you with an \"fn\" key like u/Unknownuser742 mentioned, but this means that all your function commands become dual-keystroke commands. fn+f1, fn+f7, etc. It can also slow down your visual comprehension, because the keycap has 4, $, and f4 printed on it. The boards that come with FN functionality are also fewer in number than the 65% boards which don't.\n\nI'm personally gonna go with a TKL because I just love first-order accessibility too much, and I need the insert/delete/printscreen/arrow keys and stuff.", "707" ], [ "Oh I can help you with this one, I do a lot of carpentry and metalworking and you'd be surprised how much this sort of thing comes up.\n\nPerhaps your easiest and least-damaging approach is to pick up a can of [Rustoleum Anti-Slip Spray](_URL_0_). Take off your keycaps, use some masking tape to tape off the sides, and then give'er a spritz. Keep in mind that ***LESS IS MORE***. You can ***ALWAYS*** add extra coats to add more grip and build-up if you want, but its much harder to take it off once its on! Start with very light sprays, from the distance the can instructs.\n\nTotally clear in colour, and has a sandy/gritty feel. I've used it to add grip to weight handles before.\n\nIf you need to clean the spray off something, use Isopropyl rubbing alcohol, or acetone. In a pinch, nailpolish remover with 2% acetone will work.", "301" ], [ "No idea how to answer your question directly, but as a fellow Canuck, I feel your pain with stupid shipping rates. If you're in Ontario, I can help you a bit, though:\n\nCheck out CrossBorderPickups (CBP). They're a courier service that provides you with a free US-based mailing address near Niagara Falls. You send all your online purchases there (often with the free US shipping companies offer), then pay CBP a small fee to truck it across the border to Markham or Mississauga. You can also pay CBP to send your package directly to you with a domestic courier. \n\nI used this process to buy some clothes off a US-only retailer, and saved like 100 bucks in doing so, even after paying for the courier fee, AND customs import fees.", "682" ], [ "Fair enough. Well, I just did the testing, and BOTH leads of BOTH capacitors HAVE continuity with BOTH the positive AND negative battery leads. Does this test now guarantee that the caps are dead? If so, I can snip them off the board to get a visual confirmation.\n\nI can't really test any other components, in part because they're SMD and very tiny, but also because the whole board is conformally coated.", "706" ], [ "> Read comments. If not enough people are talking about it, skip that shit. See the download numbers. \n\nThe distribution has in excess of 35000 downloads, and about 6 pages of comments across two years, with discussion between the users and the uploader. \n\n & #x200B;\n\n > If its a virus, skip that shit. \n\nWell see, that's that crux of the issue. When a program like VirusTotal says its a real virus, but users are split, with half saying it is, and half saying its just the crack doing what its supposed to... who am I supposed to believe? \n\n & #x200B;\n\n > You can try installing the whole thing in virtualbox. \n\nI have, actually! As of late last night, I've got the whole thing, trojans and all, installed in a virtual Windows 10. Thing is..... what exactly am I supposed to be looking for, now? We're past the days of viruses playing music and putting on a show for you. Even if it IS malicious, it would do its stuff silently, and behind the scenes, so, virtual machine or not, what do I look for now to tell if its safe to install on my actual OS?\n\n & #x200B;\n\nThank you for taking the time to provide a detailed response to my question!", "171" ], [ "> Attackers aren't typically trying to target people downloading CAD programs and working with high end software. They prey upon dumb dumbs looking for the latest bluray rip of whatever triple A movie or some new music album. Attackers go for the lowest common denominator. The people who don't know that an mp3 shouldn't be an executable file or the ones that have to ask if an 8mb bluray movie video is ok. \n\nI mean... yeah lol... that's fair. Can't really argue any of that.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > If it does nothing visibly or readily apparent, like most virus actually are-than you probably aren't going to notice anyway. \n\nRight? This is why I never really understood people's suggestions to run it in a VM either... like.. even if it WAS a real virus, it's not like it would give me anything to see to recognize that.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nMy last question for you, then, surrounds this:\n\n > Cryptominers are great exanples of subtlety. Most people who don't know anything won't notice while a cryptominer eats up their resources, while someone more tech savy who knows how to read a process tree will. \n\nI was wondering, how much of your resources get consumed by things like cryptominers? I'd imagine that if they were using up 20% of people's processors, and 6GB of RAM, they'd be extremely easy to notice... so is this what they do? Or do they make use of 0.005% of your CPU and just 3.5mb of RAM, across tens of thousands of machines? Is there a guide anywhere I can use to learn to identify cryptominers? Are there antimalware programs that will be able to find and quarantine them?", "171" ], [ "You may be jumbling the terms here, so I just want to be clear:\n\nYou have an ethernet cable port in a wall, and you're plugging that ethernet cable into a WiFi Booster? I assume the other end of the cable is directly connected to your modem or router, right? ***It needs to be, or else there is nothing supplying internet to the booster.***\n\nThe reason I'm asking is because you say that the Wifi works fine if you directly wire your pc to the ethernet cable... but that doesn't make sense. If your PC is connected via ethernet, then it can't connect to Wifi anyways.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nEdit: Rather than waiting for your reply, here's a few solutions for different scenarios:\n\n1. If your \"Wi-Fi booster\" ***is*** ***actually*** a Wi-Fi booster, and ***only*** a Wi-Fi booster, then it shouldn't even ***have*** an ethernet port. It will just get plugged into a wall, and connect to your wireless network, where it will then broadcast a ***separate*** network. This is the one you will need to connect your laptop to. (Unless it's a mesh network booster)\n2. If your \"Wi-Fi booster\" is actually a Ethernet-Over-Power (sometimes called Powerline) adapter, then it's not a Wi-Fi device at all, and actually needs TWO such devices. One gets plugged into a wall near your router, and is connected directly to the router with an ethernet cable. The other gets plugged into a wall near your laptop, ***and then gets connected to your laptop with a second ethernet cable.***\n3. If your \"Wi-Fi booster\" is actually a Powerline-Wifi combo, then you would have a setup similar to number 2: one unit gets plugged into a wall near your router, and is physically connected to it with an ethernet cable, ***but this time, the other unit, the Wi-Fi broadcaster, can be plugged in anywhere near your room***, and it will create a Wi-Fi network for you to connect to.", "551" ], [ "Yeah, fortunately I have all my stuff backed up already, and was planning a wipe anyways, but I've always wondered about this, and if there's a way to dig out the programs once they're installed, rather than just catching them the moment they're downloaded.\n\nI'm also wondering about making backups... how can you be sure that your files are clean, before you back them up? Because if they're infected, then your wipe will accomplish nothing. Its basically the same problem -- can you dig out embedded malware?", "171" ], [ "> I feel like he overvalues me at times, so I never felt comfortable asking for a raise. The only time I considered asking, he gave me one before I could ask.\n\nWhen I read lines like this from people, I'm filled with a sense of panic for their well-being, because this is a psychological trap that a lot of people fall into, and has kept a ***lot*** of the people in my life from earning what they easily could be earning.\n\nNow, I'm not saying that you need to go back to your boss and demand a raise. What I ***am*** saying is that you can ***NOT*** allow your decision of whether or not to ask for a raise to come from a place of \"comfort\". If it does, ***you are tying your income to your self-esteem.*** I know so many people who are making less than their peers, for ***no other reason*** than because they don't ***think*** they deserve to ask for more.\n\nYour decision to ask for a raise or to stay silent ***must ONLY come from a place of pure, rational logic.*** Research your job in your area, and see what the common pay is for someone with your experience. Talk to your friends who are in the trades, and see what they're getting paid. You ***MUST*** get at ***LEAST*** what they are getting, if you have the same experience, and you ***DESERVE*** to be making even more, if you really are the type to go above and beyond in your effort and demeanor -- with all those \"sharp pencils\".\n\nWhile you could be posting this from anywhere in the world, I'm going to assume you're in the US, simply because you're using the term \"college\". If this is the case, I just want to point out that $14 an hour is ***less*** than the minimum wage in Canada, and our money is worth 30% less than yours!\n\nIf you put effort in, show a good attitude, help your peers, and stand behind your work, then you deserve to make a liveable wage. Best of luck.", "895" ], [ "r/woosh You're talking a bit over my head there, buddy. I DID actually run the program in a VirtualBox environment, but, i mean, it's not like the malware would put on a song and a dance for me if it was doing something nefarious. I don't know how I'm supposed to really tell if it is negatively affecting anything.\n\nAs far as hash comparisons go, thats something I still have to learn. In the meantime, I'm hoping that antivirus/antimalware programs can pick up my slack, and detect things that have been left behind.", "171" ], [ "Granted, everything you've said is true. I've tried to stick to the basic principle of proper torrenting: downloading from a \"trustworthy\" uploader, off a \"trustworthy\" site. In this case, I went to _URL_2_ , found the programs I wanted, and used the links he provides on their pages to get the files from [_URL_1_](_URL_0_) \\-- note that it's .ru, not .org. I realize this is less preferable, but he stopped uploading to the .org, and from what I've read, the .ru is trustworthy too. I'm just worried that despite all of this.... my system is compromised in some way I just can't tell.\n\nI just find it weird how these cracked programs are triggering Trojan alerts, but the ones i got several years ago from sketchy piratebay never raised any alarms.", "963" ], [ "The earth underfoot will split asunder, and fire and brimstone shall rain from the skies, before I ever ***willingly*** use Norton. \n\nSo far, I've run multiple Windows Defender scans, Malwarebytes scans, two HitmanPro scans, and a Bitdefender scan. Apart from the actual .iso files which contained the malware, they're not finding anything on my pc.", "171" ], [ "It was actually the same computer, and the same antivirus, literally just a few weeks ago! It was an old version of adobe products, from 2017, and it was what I was using until i decided to replace it with the 2021 version... but my first attempt was from piratebay, before i found this sub and started reading/learning. Truth be told, the programs worked fine, and there was no flagged trojan/keygen/anything in the files.... but now the \"trustworthy\" ones from the \"Trustworthy\" site are getting tons of flags. Kind of weird.", "370" ], [ "Ooh, thank you for this advise. I had seen the MWF lite, but when i tried to download it, it still brought me to the \"trial\" sign-up page, so I thought it was still a paid version. \n\nI am not gonna learn any Dynamo atm because I'm already trying to learn... well.. revit itself, but I will try to learn about structural families to make use of your point 1. \n\nAnd yeah, tbh, the idea of using curtain walls sounded janky to me, so I guess I'll just have to do it the manual way, if I can't find any add-ons. Thank you!", "149" ], [ "Okay, first of all, the last picture in that gallery is ***amazing***. \n\nThere are two approaches here, one is, as you read, to use painters tape to mask off the edges of the canvas. They do make \"delicate surface\" painters tape that is even less sticky than regular painters tape, which may work fine for you.\n\nThe approach I'd recommend, though, is to use very thin metal. Try to find some \"Metal Flashing\". This is usually very thing-gauge metal used in construction. You may have to buy a whole roll, or you may be able to just buy a few feet of it, but all you really need is a section maybe 16 inches long. Because its so thin, you can place it on the painting, and just slip the edge of it under the edge of the frame. Now you can paint the frame, and because the metal has no adhesive on it, nothing sticks to the painting, and there's no risk of tearing some of the paint off.", "761" ], [ "It's possible to get this to work, but it might be a bit janky. You need [threaded inserts for wood](_URL_0_) that are of the correct size and thread count for the bolts on your Bennasen bed legs. Find a suitable spot, drill the required pilot hole for the threaded inserts, insert them, and then you can screw the legs into those. Unfortunately, it won't be very stable, unless you can also drill a > 1\" shallow hole to accommodate the black plastic circle at the base of the screw on the legs.", "301" ], [ "No reinforcement is needed for the hole, period. You're talking about a tiny hole in a massive table. There will be ***no*** effect on its strength.\n\nIn order to compensate for the curve, though, you will need to add bracing to the underside of the table, running across its length. This bracing can not be made of particleboard, MDF, or plywood that is laid flat. It must be made of either solid wood, metal, or plywood strips that are attached so that the layers are running vertically into the tabletop.", "309" ], [ "As commented above/below me, drywall anchors CAN hold an impressive amount of weight, especially when multiple are used. In 3/4 drywall, even the weakest are rated for loads of about 50-85 lbs, and that's for a single anchor. You can watch Project Farm's video on youtube about the subject to see which versions are strongest and easiest to use.\n\nThat being said, if studs are available, it's a no-brainer. You just drill into the studs. Problem solved, even a few screws will hold all of your bikes with no problems. Get it into multiple studs, and you could probably do pull-ups. \n\nI don't know what the comment above/below me is saying about anchors into studs, though.... you don't use anchors in studs, just use screws of an appropriate length (whatever length it needs to be so that you get at least two inches of screw IN the stud, once you take the thickness of your board, and the 3/4\" thickness of the drywall into account.", "309" ], [ "You cannot straighten bent pipes, they will always be structurally compromised, and will only have a fraction of their original strength. They must either be splinted, or patched the way u/MrTranquility_ suggested. Cut the pipe, cut out the bent section, and find whichever pipe is the most perfect fit to either slip inside or outside of the existing tubes. You will need a way to hold these pipe sections together. Duct tape would work in the short-term, but I would recommend a metal-rated adhesive.", "301" ], [ "It's not too hard, no strength is needed for the actual grinding, the machine's weight is distributed such that it applies the correct working pressure on its own. Strength ***is*** needed to actually move the machine around, though. To get it across your property, to get it over to the stump, etc. \n\nThe only thing is, most of the times I've checked, the stump grinders at home depot have been so dull, that we were able to remove stumps faster with just a shovel and reciprocating saw. Make sure the teeth are sharp, or don't rent it. Consider a private rental company instead of Home Depot - they are more likely to take machine maintenance seriously.", "696" ], [ "The issue here is that kitchen counters are made out of particle board, which is not very strong. \n\nWhen desks are made out of particle board or MDF, they tend to sag a lot. A desk made of baltic birch plywood (not fir-cored plywood) will be stronger. A desk made of solid white oak will be far stronger, still. Because you're going with particleboard, you will need bracing on the underside, as u/NecroJoe recommended. How you go about this is up to you, but the bar Necro linked is a good option.", "309" ], [ "> iOS Magic Keyboard\n\nDifferent hinges for different products. Low-profile laptop keyboards often use \"Butterfly Clips\" or \"Butterfly Hinges\". Full-sized keyboards use completely different mechanisms. Some use rubber membranes. Some use metal bars and springs, some use built-in spring systems like Cherry MX keys. Buying them in small quantities is very hard, you can browse sites like Ebay and AliExpress and Alibaba, but expect order quantities in terms of 25-50-100-200 minimums.", "144" ], [ "Everything I know about building tells me that your current plans will not be stable. You will need in excess of 60-80 lbs at the base to stabilize something 8 feet tall from a 10-ft load. I made a collapsible wedding arch for a client that had to have a low-profile base, and I poured 80-lb concrete footings, but the thing was still suuuuuper tippy. Rather than going purely for weight, you need to have a wide base. for an 8-ft tall pole with a 10-lb cat, your base should be at least 2'x2' across, with about 40-50 lbs of weight. The pole itself though doesn't matter, your ABS pipe with the flanges u/Guygan linked will work fine, but it will need buttressing/bracing near the base.", "309" ], [ "I intend on actually building what I design myself... like... by hand. So I need to produce materials purchasing lists for project estimating, I need measurements and cut-lists for every piece of wood, etc. I can get totals using the math you suggest, but not specifics.\n\nNot to mention that during the design phase, I need to be able to think through what I'm designing, and make sure that it all makes sense, is to code, etc.", "53" ], [ "You'll have a tabletop about 3 inches thick at that point, which can be very bad for ergonomics, and can lead to a lot of shoulder and neck strain. If you want to try your hand at building something yourself, the cheapest and strongest way would be to build a Torsion Box. Just google it and you'll see what they are. Use 1/2\" sheets of plywood, and then 1/2\" strips of a hard wood like Maple or Oak, and you'll have a VERY strong desk that's half as thick.", "309" ], [ "Oh yay! My first \"Rip Inbox\"! I ***never*** expected this to get as much attention as it has, thank you to everyone who has engaged with it, and thank you very much to [/u/Nandersun](_URL_0_) for the platinum, [/u/Wheazzy](_URL_1_) for the gold, and everyone else who gave an award. Y'all really didn't have to, but it makes me happy :) \n\nI will try my best to respond to everyone who's commented, and I will amend this post with results from further testing (like testing other ENB's, testing BethINI, etc.)!", "201" ], [ "Its true, some effects ARE really hard to see, which is why I took identical screenshots after toggling each effect. Screen-Space Reflections and Lens Flare, for example, both were nearly completely invisible in a dry outdoor scene, but removing them yielded decent FPS gains. Indoors, though, you'll notice the lack of reflections much more. IMO, ambient-occlusion was one of the ones that actually did make a big visual difference to the game, the Skyrim's Baked-In AO appeared to have ZERO effect on framerates (I even tested it three times from scratch because I couldn't believe it, but sure enough, you can see in the picture that the trees ARE missing their AO, but yet my framerates were the EXACT same as Baseline.) The ENB's AO, on the other hand, kills nearly 10 FPS. So I second what u/LavosYT suggested: Disable the ENB's AO, and enable the game's instead.\n\nAlso, if you DO want depth of field, you can still regain about 4-6 FPS by decreasing the radius of the bokeh, in the Shift+Enter ENB Console. I forget the exact name of the line entry, but its under the depth of field controls, and basically shrinks the size of each blurred bokeh ball. The net result is that the blurr is a little less blurry, but works 4-6 FPS faster.", "404" ], [ "> On your test enable ambient occlusion for some reason had no impact on FPS which is tbh beyond me. I loose arround 6-8fps with it enabled and 2-5 fps with DOF \n\nI know, this one struck me as really bizzare, too. ***The ENB's AO*** kills nearly 10 FPS, but Skyrim's baked-in AO seems to have no effect at all, despite yielding a clear visual difference. I was so surprised by this that I reset the .ini's and re-tested it three times, but sure enough, even though i could physically see the AO going on and off, the framerate was completely unchanged.", "404" ], [ "The ***intent*** of DynDOLOD is to dynamically load LOD assets, but also to dynamically UNLOAD the ones which are visually occluded. So, if you're staring at a mountain, the LOD assets on the side facing you will be loaded, but the ones on the far side will be un-loaded. The game's built-in system doesn't do this, and therefore wastes resources loading in LOD assets that you can't even see. \n\nAs such, DynDOLOD ***can*** yield performance ***gains***, but it depends on a lot of factors, like where you are in the world and where you're looking, along with the settings you choose when creating the LOD assets. I tested DynDOLOD at another user's recommendation, because it saved them a few frames, and still looked better than vanilla, but on my system, I couldn't replicate these results. On medium settings, DynDOLOD may have actually cost me one or two frames, but on Low, it made no difference, but didn't improve anything, either.", "829" ], [ "The God rays made a HUGE difference to the visuals of the game though, as you can see in the screenshots. Personally, I actually like the more saturated look when they're off, but I may end up liking them more On when in different environments and weathers. Hard to say, but ya, start by turning them to Low, see what your results are, then try Off. \n\nAlso, sounds like you have an interesting build, mind taking and sharing a screenshot at the helgen cave entrance?", "659" ], [ ":D\n\nYay! That's the best result I could have hoped for! Give your potato a good pat for me, I'm sure it's doing its best.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Kind of strange that you went through all this without using BethINI but still\n\n & #x200B;\n\nThe reason I didnt try BethINI yet is because this first stage was all about single-variable testing, making changes to a single .INI setting at a time. Now that that's out of the way, and I've established the effects each setting has on performance, I'm going to try things like BethINI to see what kinds of ***compound*** effects we can get. I'll add the results of this testing to the Spreadsheet.", "95" ], [ "It's a large file, so on mobile (and even desktop) you'll have to right click/long hold and open the image in a new tab, and then zoom.\n\nBut thanks for the Google Sheets suggestion, didn't even think of it! I'll add it shortly. \n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Did you only test average FPS? 1% lows is useful to test when you stat having mod bloat. \n\nI did only test averages, as there essentially WERE no lows. If I recorded a value of, say, 55 FPS, the framerate would have ***never*** dropped below 54 or risen above 56 during that test. This is thanks to it being an otherwise completely unmodded client, which it had to be for obvious reasons.", "17" ], [ "I can only give a half-answer as I haven't tested grass mods on SE yet because I'm still working on getting a decent FPS base for that. \n\nWhat I can say though is that on Oldrim, I went with Unbelievable Grasses 2, and I gotta say, it's been great. Cost me only like 3 FPS but looks fantastic. SE's default grasses though are already leagues ahead of Oldrim, so I don't know how useful heavy-duty grass mods will be to me here.", "659" ], [ "No, actually, even with 4K everything, I'm sitting at only 4.7Gb out of 8 Gb available VRAM. \n\n***Texture mods*** aren't dropping my framerate per se, as you'll notice that the Noble Skyrim 2K had very little effect. ***Parallax*** Texture mods, on the other hand, do, because of the extra processing involved in rendering the parallax effect. That's why I also tested the 2020 Skyrim Parallax texture pack, as it was the most-downloaded pack of its kind. Not a direct comparison, I know, 2K vs 4K, I know, but whatever.", "375" ], [ "Very sound logic, but unfortunately, what you're asking requires an even deeper level of computing knowledge. Copying files from a downloaded folder into a directory is fairly simple for everyone to do, but fiddling with game settings and driver settings requires another level of commitment to understanding. One I just don't have the patience to develop :P", "171" ], [ "I like your username.\n\nAlso yeah, now that the single-variable testing is out of the way, I'm doing to start doing multi-variable changes, like the ones made by BethINI. As for the fade settings, yeah, its a pretty easy way to get extra frames, but I gotta admit the loss of immersion and visual satisfaction when nothing loads in more than 20 feet away from you is just.... :( High object fades are one thing I think are very important to the look of the game. \n\nBut thank you for the info, and especially for that mod link! I'll test it out and add the results to the Spreadsheet.", "659" ], [ "Yeah, this really is the crux of the issue when compared to everyone elses results.\n\nI guess I should mention that I'm at this resolution not because I have a fetish for setting my computer on fire, but simply because my screen is a 35\" Ultrawide. This resolution is the lowest you can have in order to have a \"retina\" display, where you can't actually see the pixels. Playing at 1920x1080p doesn't work either, as it's a non-squared root of 3440x1440, so I'll end up with upscaling artifacts. I'll try it at 2560x1440 next, but I'm not hopeful.", "375" ], [ "Part of WHY I decided to test these things in the first place was because everything I read kept saying \"but it depends on your hardware tho so lol <PERSON>.\" I wanted to see EXACTLY what the effects would be on what I consider to be good hardware by today's standards -- not the best, by any means, but something that would be affordable to the average PC gamer. It was a nearly $3000 dollar build in 2017, but would probably be around 1000-1200 today (Canadian pesos). \n\nAnd thank you! Glad to know it's appreciated :)", "217" ], [ "Ah, sorry. I've only ever seen people on reddit link to images with Imgur, so I figured that was just like, what's expected on the platform. Is there a image hosting service you recommend instead?\n\nI did actually have framerate-recording software running in the background, in the form of Skyrim Performance Monitor 64, and the framerate graphs are essentially perfectly stable. This is almost certainly because i recorded my values while stationary, without the camera moving. It would be extremely hard to record dynamic framerate values in any sort of a standardized/meaningful way.", "17" ], [ "You know what, [Maybe I Spoke Too Soon](_URL_0_).\n\nThere ***is*** a difference, but I gotta admit, it's rather subtle. The upscaling usually manifests as just a subtle blurring of the whole screen. I gotta admit, this ain't that bad, but theres a second problem: I have to switch my display's resolution to a matching 2560x1080 every time I want to launch the game, or it will simply load in a borderless window covering only 3/4 of the screen, even though the .ini's are set to launch it as a fullscreen application.", "404" ] ]
368
[ 18844, 3120, 20009, 23036, 8162, 5819, 22270, 14913, 20645, 10345, 14383, 23116, 21108, 6873, 13401, 24872, 8290, 13463, 22234, 13070, 9689, 20324, 21706, 14302, 10916, 7183, 11986, 8086, 6936, 8440, 3845, 10467, 14167, 7214, 23065, 12857, 18364, 8444, 15683, 11609, 11388, 12985, 12797, 7304, 4508, 8972, 23353, 11452, 546, 8755, 3334, 16429, 300, 5235, 12415, 1623, 8095, 8826, 25282, 4636, 5634, 2316, 24542, 14723, 24007, 24200, 2909, 21803, 24509, 21673, 4185, 13468, 19106, 12108, 8836, 16187, 6253, 10016, 9084, 22617, 16619, 2589, 15981, 11900, 15402, 11738, 16054, 5724, 3887, 16254, 3121, 855, 16788, 16898, 2381, 197, 22222, 22815, 2373, 16499, 7236, 21639, 3459, 17974, 7181, 11468, 9222, 8969, 18176, 14340, 16872, 25148, 22453, 23883, 3913, 6068, 1248, 9351, 5984, 24122, 6395, 7208, 7823, 18460, 11169, 3586, 4217, 8690, 8184, 14847, 6044, 4475, 1663, 8856, 8291, 17170, 3473, 2414, 14116, 9982, 20080, 2544, 23155, 24518, 2004, 10452, 22696, 1534, 17298, 16027, 25309, 10612, 23962, 25155, 334, 11563, 13982, 12515, 23246, 19210, 19990, 11968, 19032, 8081, 18887, 23665, 7010, 2383, 9405, 706, 15050, 23153, 5097, 16419, 22376, 123, 5333, 686, 20285, 17229, 1789, 24423, 6848, 20700, 22953, 5979, 3799, 20457, 15848, 8570, 2057, 2986, 11343, 6509, 12146, 7276, 2707, 1863, 20833, 6124, 3632, 24054, 3075, 2375, 376, 17423, 14642, 13804, 16845, 4221, 3482, 17503, 9316, 2800, 9099, 18867, 22045, 15702, 16197, 20918, 11977, 6137, 12903, 5465, 7482, 18769, 15040, 12536, 3242, 16722, 17594, 4619, 12720, 17591, 13894, 5049, 8093, 23597, 17576, 25266, 14152, 1195, 2572, 24174, 12711, 24394, 9282, 12879, 16340, 12234, 21360, 14726, 5934, 9277, 3228, 6148, 11234, 15754, 16968, 16164, 24957, 15045, 1389, 13017, 16841, 5894, 19439, 17970, 3494, 6367, 18452, 23097, 13695, 24548, 14535, 18288, 19949, 5090, 5560, 19607, 9593, 7168, 7578, 4608, 3401, 18190, 10470, 25538, 14111, 7433, 12405, 16335, 7013, 21350, 8870, 17162, 25071, 13434, 4340, 19631, 3520, 5016, 10086, 14484, 19209, 5495, 11270, 19699, 8645, 12256, 19899, 3056, 19989, 10386, 5031, 8099, 20270, 2579, 4542, 5244, 18719, 2123, 23627, 18035, 10415, 24148, 14722, 24904, 6882, 8748, 12740, 16463, 18370, 3493, 23492, 9444, 23506, 405, 16249, 12464, 3822, 1827, 21175, 20428, 22749, 2395, 9142, 18051, 6403, 14028, 19963, 23230, 13924, 9077, 19466, 4599, 14084, 156, 9426, 12734, 124, 17473, 13430, 23332, 17665, 20863, 6745, 13739, 19083, 20888, 8331, 11844, 5648, 24247, 3462, 2872, 5422, 11840, 23638, 12277, 16479, 13772, 16400, 11197, 22365, 3186, 292, 1919, 23613, 9482, 11594, 2391, 7272, 18287, 25418, 24146, 11883, 22652, 9079, 6347, 11985, 20445, 21972, 18331, 18722, 11547, 5286, 5159, 813, 8712, 24139, 3351, 18242, 3200, 20710, 1305, 18653, 4200, 19272, 3864, 1636, 140, 6630, 20787, 7524, 9899, 18661, 22269, 1857, 25470, 6327, 20568, 11754, 22582, 14731, 1692, 17913, 12272, 13748, 2984, 14062, 13024, 8395, 12524, 9685, 3224, 11749, 5793, 12599, 10103, 13100, 678, 23297, 25191, 24507, 2421, 8255, 16167, 13918, 10602, 3252, 15272, 11711, 14632, 7153, 18619, 12210, 15845, 13876, 12463, 6495, 19779, 17406, 11278, 14472, 11433, 8115, 11279, 2611, 3718, 1095, 2535, 14060, 9220, 5480, 19480, 16129, 22447, 20364, 20268, 5636, 17122, 23677, 13315, 4066, 12902, 11930, 18158, 950 ]
reddit_dump_--_-_o_-_--
[ [ "It doesn't. Haven't you learned that the shillbots who overtake open platforms do not want good discussion. They want to push their agenda according to directives.\n\nThey want some speech to not face restrictions eg let's commit insurrection and hate on minorities. On the other hand they want to restrict speech from \"the left\", the socialists and the commies.\n\nThey ignore calls to kill members of the government while they have a tantrum about gendered pronouns.", "106" ], [ "In Fiji (and other places) there is lots of undeveloped private land this is illegally squatted. Those natives live in the forest, off the land. They then consume resources from the forest. If they take enough of the private property owner's water it can limit the owner's ability to produce or develop their land to its full potential. The illegal squatters are very difficult to locate and evict. At the same time they use legal representatives to pursue naive title rights to become the owner of those resources. This example is analogous to current events online.", "431" ], [ "Who cares? No [appeals to emotion](_URL_1_), like this one at the [Guardian](_URL_0_). This old man's decision to travel was his and his alone.\n\nIt will be just fine and dandy if less people cross our state borders in the years ahead. I would never give that a second thought. Its easy to not cross borders so going on about crossing borders seems weird to me. Its the same with our international borders.\n\nIf it results in less carbon pollution then I am all for it. 👌 Any limits on fossil fueled vehicle transport is a godsend for humanity and the planet. 👍 Restoring one of \"the world's busiest flight routes\" is not in the interests of anybody. ❎\n\nWe need the opposite. We need discharges of carbon to keep declining in the years ahead, rapidly and dramatically. The bad people with wrong plans have to be stopped to avoid climate catastrophe. Remember people like <PERSON>, who encourages trade with China, let bad things like China persist by providing legitimacy.", "771" ], [ "Why must all Australians face greater risk to their health because some people want to watch a live game of tennis? This seems wrong and immoral.\n\nWhy must all Australians face greater risk to their health and well-being because some people who decided to leave the country now want to come back? Shut the doors properly and ban all travel to Australia for all but the most absolute necessary, eg to bring vaccines here.\n\nWhy must all Australians face greater risk to their health, well-being and dignity because some people choose to burn fossil fuels? We should abandon the poor habit of relying on oil, coal and natural gas combustion.\n\nWe must respond to the threat and not rely on false hope peddled out by mediated liars. Lets be dignified in how we conduct our affairs.", "771" ], [ "No. Our speech is free regardless of what Twitter does. So no worries there buddy. 👍\n\nTwitter has the freedom to ban. Likewise all users have the freedom to stop using Twitter. Twitter doesn't arbitrarily ban a million conservatives at once because that would be detrimental to their bottom line. Users return because they determine it is in their best interests to. 🗽\n\nFreedom prevails, even when your idea of what constitutes freedom is not predominate. You must stop selectively insisting your rights extend into private property.\n\nWhere have all the free speech advocates been regarding bias at Faux News? They never have the green side on their show. Why doesn't Faux News have more guests on from Greenpeace? ♻️ Its because they want to deny free speech to environmentalists.\n\nWhaT about tHe GreeniEs? Great harm comes to humans and the planet when certain voices are not heard. Great economic damage such as loss of biodiversity, land-clearing, plastic pollution and climate change comes from the denial on display at Faux News.\n\nRelax about it. Its going to be fine. 😊", "106" ], [ "Can you imagine if we managed climate change the same way?\n\nThe premier would start with a status update, telling everyone how many tonnes of carbon pollution were released in the previous 24 hours and from which sectors of the economy. They would show us the stats and let us know how much of the carbon budget remains and that we must act quickly to prevent the economic damage from climate change.\n\nWe would then have the environment minister begging people to not turn the ignition on for machines that combust a fossil fuel, begging them to quit eating beef and to not book a flight to Bali because those are the activities that pose the greatest risk to others. The minister would be begging people to use an app that tells you your carbon footprint for the week. They would be imploring us to consider the vulnerable as we go about our business.", "637" ], [ "I can't see a single downside to this. You are going to have to tell me more about \"how bad this is\" because I am not even slightly concerned or interested in these figures. The Australian government can dump one of [those submarines](_URL_0_) and put the money saved into tertiary education if it needed. That is not the issue.\n\nI want less international students because when international students journey to Australia they emit carbon emissions and that stuff is destroying my country.", "762" ], [ "Radical, systemic change only.\n\n > believing or expressing the belief that there should be great or extreme social or political change\n\nRight wing politics can never provide that so ideology classified in that half of the political spectrum will always cause more global heating. It will always be blind to the solution.\n\n > “If it can't be controlled to produce a profit, then free market innovation is blind to its potential.” – <PERSON>", "285" ], [ "> “I don't want your hope. I don't want you to be hopeful. I want you to panic. I want you to feel the fear I feel every day. And then I want you to act.” - <PERSON>\n\nAct now <PERSON>. Go on the socials and tell the tennis players who flew into Australia off. Tell them they are doing the wrong thing. Tell them that it would have been best if they had not done that and instead they should have stayed home. Tell them or else your silence will betray you.\n\nSave the planet. You must be brave, for you know best. Don't you?", "877" ], [ "Its up to Twitter to do what it wants, unless its discriminatory against a protected class and even then I want religious groups to be removed from protected class status. If the masses disagree then they can move on or not. Freedom.\n\nYou don't have to agree with Twitter or my secular view on discrimination against religion. Free speech.\n\nI support the right for any business to discriminate on the basis of religious affiliation, for sure, since that its always a choice to participate in those activities. See also [The Venn Diagram of Irrational Nonsense](_URL_0_).", "106" ], [ "Twitter is not the public square. Twitter is not defining anything, especially not the truth. Twitter doesn't care if you disagree with its determination. You can fight for trooff all you like cultural warrior.\n\nThe people who work for Twitter are able to come to a decision about what is acceptable or not on their platform. You aren't required to agree with their determination. If anyone is upset or offended by it, they can decide to not use Twitter, just like an employee of Twitter who disagrees can move on to another job. You have the freedom, as does everyone else. Its one of the things that sites make clear in their terms of service agreement; that all users are free to stop using any time. Likewise if you want to have a Facebook overlord or an Apple decision maker or Sony overlord or an Android boss you can.\n\nI think its a good thing for social media to be shaken up and stirred around. Its allows for the strong to overcome its competition in a marketplace. Everyone who is upset about decisions Twitter makes can decide for themselves if they want to continue to use Twitter or an alternative or none at all.\n\nThe Godfather of software has been warning us all for decades about the threat. See his lists of What's bad about on [his home page](_URL_0_).", "106" ], [ "Watch out! \"The left\" will get you. 🤭 You are saying to me \"The bogey man said something bad.\" 👻 When someone says \"the left' I always think wtf? That is crazy talk dude. 🤪 There is no such thing as \"the left\".\n\nIf you believe in \"the left\" then its a clear sign that you have been listening to propaganda based on right wing ideology. Do you watch Faux News?", "965" ], [ "False headline. Twitter is opposed to internet shutdowns. Internet is the medium. Twitter is the media.\n\nYoutube is finally kicking domestic terrorist <PERSON> off. 😁 Now going forward I do hope that I do not hear a word or a tweet or anything from that god awful abomination. I strongly condemn <PERSON> and his supporters. 👎 🛑 ❌\n\nI want all pro-Trump shit gone from Reddit too. We have heard all that right wing bullshit before. Enough is enough. I 💚 online content moderation. I 💚 free speech. No fear.", "106" ], [ "Your definition of book burning is false.\n\n > [Book burning](_URL_0_) is the deliberate destruction by fire of books or other written materials, usually carried out in a public context. \n\nNobody is advocating for the deliberate destruction of anything. This is more to do with sales, not book burning.\n\nIts not you or a right wing mob who gets to define what speech is free or not. You aren't going to redefine what censorship means.\n\n<PERSON>'s speech is still free. <PERSON> is still able to share his speech. Isn't he? He can stand on a sidewalk and give away his speech. He can do interviews and go on the radio, do presentations and what not.\n\nYou have to get real if you want to be persuasive. Its not censorship unless the government or an authority says its illegal to publish or sell specific speech. \n\nNow if the protesters were wanting to get the government to crack down on people like <PERSON> and stop those ideas spreading with real punitive measures then it would be considered anti-free speech.\n\nPlease try to understand this fundamental concept that forms the basis of censorship. Try to understand the bigger picture better instead of knee-jerk reacting.", "865" ], [ "Yes and all Twitter users are cool with that because they keep being Twitter users. If they weren't down with Twitter, if they don't share those values, then they could move on. If they stay with Twitter or if they move on they still have their free speech rights intact. I would move on. For a long time I helped build Wikipedia but then when I had some fundamental disagreement I stopped building it.\n\nDid <PERSON> recover from his Twitter \"censorship\" ordeal? What harm emerged from that? If you can tell me about some harm or some bad thing that arose in this instance or from when <PERSON> was deplatformed I might be concerned too. Otherwise I just dismiss <PERSON>'s rhetoric.\n\nYou should try to learn the difference between censorship and moderation.", "106" ], [ "Try to distinguish between the media and the medium. Web sites, apps and phone calls are the media we experience or consume. The internet and phone is the medium that is provided.\n\nI agree its not good when these vital services or utilities are provided by a sole supplier. I hate that and that should be illegal. In Australia we have limited electricity providers. It means our power bills are high. We have few mainstream television networks, a lack of diversity in newspapers as well as a concentration around the major websites. I support diversity in the marketplace which is one reason why I encourage people to use alternatives. I don't see nearly enough new players in certain industries like banking or petrol retailing. That indicates something is wrong. Online its the opposite. There are so many new sites and apps with so many features. Most of the hardcore chat has gone to the darkweb forums. Authorities can track it but can't block it so its not widely discussed in detail for security reasons.\n\nAustralia is trying to tame these sites and apps influence by limiting their ability to profit by advertising for news content they haven't paid for. If you want to limit big tech's influence then instead of whinging and whinging about the horrors of censorship, you should attack their business model. I hate ads so I block them. I don't support media companies through paid subscriptions, buying copyrighted material either. Don't be angry at people like me who have stayed away Facebook, Twitter, Insta, Whatapp.\n\n > “We’ve centralized all of our data to a guy called <PERSON>, who’s basically the biggest dictator in the world as he wasn’t elected by anyone.  <PERSON> is basically in control over this data that <PERSON> has, so I think we’re already there. Everything that could go wrong has gone wrong and I don’t think there’s a way for us to stop it.” - <PERSON>", "106" ], [ "Great question. You tested my assumption. The answer is because if you want to foster an ideology you have to have ideologues who are worshiped then fulfill particular roles for political purposes. It might be about [co-option](_URL_2_).\n\n > Co-option may refer to the process of adding members to an elite [group](_URL_0_) at the discretion of members of the body, usually to manage opposition and so maintain the stability of the group. Outsiders are \"co-opted\" by being given a degree of power on the grounds of their elite status, specialist knowledge, or potential ability to threaten essential commitments or goals (\"formal co-optation\"). Co-optation may take place in many other contexts, such as a technique by a dictatorship to control opposition. \n > \n > Co-optation also refers to the process by which a group subsumes or acculturates a smaller or weaker group with related interests; or, similarly, the process by which one group gains converts from another group by replicating some aspects of it without adopting the full program or ideal (\"informal co-optation\"). Co-optation is associated with the cultural tactic of [recuperation](_URL_1_), and is often understood to be synonymous with it.\n\nThis is what <PERSON> tries to do. He tries to collect the grievances from the public, like a clergy man might have done centuries past. Authority gets subverted through co-option. I think corruption emerges from hierarchies susceptible to co-option.", "305" ], [ "Education is the most common way we learn. Also experts, asking consultants, through training and self-learning and by using reference materials.\n\nI've heard opposing views often but not learned anything. I don't click on breitbart or townhall links. Those sites are too extremist. I've heard <PERSON>'s extremist rhetoric via internet headlines without hearing him speak. He always talks shit so I always stop listening if he pops up. ❎\n\nI could go to /r/conservative or /r/AskThe_Donald right now and not learn anything. ❎ I go to many subs with expressions consisting of views I disagree with. Most of them are very memey whereas I prefer fact-based article posts found at /r/politics to learn from. ✅ Wow, that sub has been awfully informative and up to date lately.", "566" ], [ "No. I don't believe you. Judaism is a religion. There is no evidence of a jewish race. Ethno-religion is a lie. Show me the genetic evidence to support your claim.\n\nNothing [here](_URL_0_) is convincing. If I search that page for race or racial I get no results. It just describes clusters and its is filled with conjecture. The sources used for many of the studies are jewish in origin. I need more independence and reliability in my sources.", "763" ], [ "No. I don't recognize the existence of your \"platforms\". I don't care about platforms. They don't interest me. These are web sites, just like all the others and should be treated just the same.\n\nThey publish. If they have been able to construct legal fabrications like platforms which then get that enshrined into law so as to evade their responsibility then its a reflection of how poorly the USA is functioning.\n\nThe USA and the world suffers from all the bullshit spread on these platforms.\n\nFaux News is a platform. Its been a platform for right wing lies for a long time. Faux News should be held to account for the lies they allow to be spread.", "67" ], [ "> Help! The free website I choose to visit from among a million others is harming me. Aaargh. Save me!\n\nis no different to\n\n > Help! The shop I am visiting doesn't sell the dog food I want. Aaargh. Save me!\n\nIts not control since using these services is done according to one's own volition. Everyone using Facebook or Twitter or Youtube or Insta does so according to their own free will. Everyone of those users is free to stop at any time.\n\nIf you want some other dog food run along to another shop.", "611" ], [ "If we did that then those services wouldn't be popular. They wouldn't be popular like Facebook and Twitter are now. The market would respond and likely say no. Law-makers who supported those changes would lose come election time.\n\nWatch the content moderation expand and then watch most of the users stay with these sites, like <PERSON>. <PERSON> stays on Twitter because he knows content moderation is not a bad thing.\n\nAmericans are unhappy with <PERSON> not big tech companies, hence his second impeachment. <PERSON> was a <PERSON> buddy wasn't he? <PERSON> must be feeling great shame.\n\nEvery time you insult another Redditor its a reflection of your lack of emotional intelligence. Its like when <PERSON> lashed out with the pedo remark.", "106" ], [ "I don't believe in your \"insane leftists and progressives that control it\" rhetoric. This is just you realizing your opinions aren't popular and you realizing that libertarian ideology is not accepted by the masses.\n\nPlease move on from this left and right thinking. \"The left\" doesn't exist. Its not a thing. Its just something you have imagined.\n\nI go to r/politics lots of times each day. Its by far the best sub on Reddit. I say that despite my permanent ban. For political news its better than any other source on any medium. Breaking news emerges very quickly on that sub.", "965" ], [ "This is absolutely true and people like Pool must be shitting themselves. Pool's best bet is to shut up shop and close everything down. The tide has turned. The clamp down on social media has only just begun.\n\nPeople like <PERSON> must be worried about the FBI investigating them for their right wing extremism. I say go get them and lock them up. As leftism spreads and takes over, \"the left\" will crush all opposition.", "827" ], [ "I did start watching the video. I stopped after his first sentence. I dismissed that as nonsense so I instantly stopped watching this silly video. No. I wouldn't like to address anything else said in this video. Its bunkum that I am flatly rejecting.\n\nYou don't have to agree with social media management. Its not required, just like I don't have to agree with this video. Thanks for the grammar tips. I understand what is and isn't a sentence.", "337" ], [ "Great, more of it. What are you going to do about it? Keep visiting or move on? This debate is over. You lost. Twitter has dumped <PERSON> permanently as I type.\n\nAll those crying foul over muh big tech censorship have been ignored. Those voices haven't been persuasive. Its purge, purge, purge, like at the start of [Pitch Black](_URL_0_).\n\nNow Reddit and all good people are going to have to go after the right wing extremists calling for violence. We will surely come for them, just as surely as the creatures come out at night to go after the survivors of a prison ship crash.", "126" ], [ "You don't have to agree with them. Its okay if you don't. Big Tech is not stopping anyone from sharing speech. <PERSON> knows this so he confects \"digital speech\".\n\nIf you don't agree with Facebook (or Twitter) nobody is forcing anyone to use their services. Its going to be okay. Everyone can exercise their freedom and move on to greener pastures if they so choose.\n\nDon't sweat the small stuff.", "106" ], [ "I don't believe you. 👎 This is nonsense. ⬇️ I dismiss your post outright. ✋ This \" 80+ million Americans\" is nothing to me but the wrong, the false, the bogus, the incorrect. ❌\n\nI say no to that. I never want to hear from <PERSON> again. Get rid of that shit and anything right wing. Its bogus. Rejected, impeached, voted out, banned, purged, thrown out, got ridden of, invalidated, dismissed.\n\nI 💛 free speech. Apple better ditch Parler too. Freedom.", "249" ], [ "The citizenry aren't being mistreated when Reddit or big tech makes a ban so I don't believe you. If they were then its their silly fault for visiting a site that mistreats them, isn't it?\n\nOnly authority may censor. People use these sites of their own free will. Freedom, unlike in China. People in China don't have freedom. They have real censorship in which dissidents are locked up.\n\nI'm not a right wing extremist, someone with a Facebook overlord or a weak Chinese national. No fear.", "106" ], [ "This video shows armed insurgents failing due to armed protective services. \n\nDon't be like this stupid bitch. Reject everything right wing. Go hard left, follow me.\n\n > Right-wing politics embrace the view that certain social orders and hierarchies are inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable, typically supporting this position on the basis of natural law, economics, or tradition. \n\nRight wing leads to trouble to more problems and more hardship. Those ideas don't solve anything or generate lasting solutions. This is self-evident from the demise of the <PERSON> administration in wretched failure. We saw 9/11 and a financial crisis befall the US under <PERSON>. The world suffers from right wing extremism caused by zionism.\n\n > Zionism is both an ideology and nationalist movement among the Jewish people that espouses the re-establishment of and support for a Jewish state in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel. \n\nLiberalism seeks to redress these false ideologies towards alignment with reality, the now, the facts.\n\n > [Left-wing politics](_URL_0_) supports social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy. Left-wing politics typically involves a concern for those in society whom its adherents perceive as disadvantaged relative to others as well as a belief that there are unjustified inequalities that need to be reduced or abolished. \n\nOnly the path leftwards towards more liberalism brings peace and justice because it addresses the abuses of power, high crimes and misdemeanors prevalent among those who fulfill roles in positions of hierarchical authority.", "285" ], [ "Spreading false information isn't something one should condone, is it? I mean if your workmates or a family member were spreading lies about you, its not something you would suggest is a good idea, is it? ❔ \n\nI can't see the point of endless speculation at subs like that. If you want to engage in that activity there are alternative crackpot sites. Lets keep Reddit for discussion about shared links and comments.\n\nWe have mods for a reason. Its called moderation. Its not censorship. Its still pretty wild around here. We have much climate change denial, anti-lockdown shit, very pro-gun subs, fully religious ones, very politically biassed ones and on and on. Have you seen some of goreporn subs? And the memes, the stupid, dumb memes. 🤯\n\nIts good to moderate content or not you can choose an alternative. I 💝free speech.", "126" ], [ "Who doesn't exist? See your weird conundrum? \n\nYou have created these straw-men to rally against. Grrrrz! You have something or someone on the brain. You seem angry and triggered.\n\nIt is [left wing politics](_URL_0_) and not \"the left\" at Wikipedia for a reason. Discuss ideas, not people. People aren't homogeneous in their beliefs.\n\nWho is \"the left\"? Me? Nope. I don't support <PERSON> or <PERSON>. I don't represent a wider group of random strangers. How does one become part of \"the left\"? There is no point in applying labels to people. Is there membership? \n\nI am not part of that group. Does \"the left\" have meetings? I have never claimed to be part of that group. Stop inventing things. Everything right wing is bogus so of course the solution is always more leftism.\n\nTry not to insult other users as its uncivil. Your whole comment is a personal attack. See Rule 2.\n\nI could never be worried about free speech online because I have infringed on copyright for decades with impunity.", "965" ], [ "What are these crazies going to do later in the month when their new president announces a return to the Paris Agreement and carbon tax for fossil fuels along with a mask mandate and a national shutdown until mass vaccinations have occurred?\n\nIf <PERSON> clamps down on right wing extremism then their media culture must be disbanded. I can see why social media is responding to the threat now. They want to appease <PERSON> so he doesn't counter too severely against them, now the Democrats have control of two seats of power. This is also why big tech encourage staff to work at home so much, much less of a target for violent crazies jaded by \"social media censorship\".\n\nIf <PERSON> is going to give Americans more welfare, pile resources into healthcare and cancel student debt he is going to have to get something back tax time or when Americans conduct their online commerce or some other structural reform along the lines of the [Green New Deal](_URL_0_).\n\nHow are the right wing ideologues going to respond when <PERSON> tries to mark his legacy with reform and the progress so desperately needed after <PERSON>'s neglect?", "771" ], [ "Israel is the #1 weapons dealer to Myanmar. The issue was taken to the Supreme Court. However the case was [gagged](_URL_1_) (censored). From 2019 it appears they were still buying [weapons from Israel](_URL_0_).\n\nBurma was one of the first countries to recognize Israel’s independence. Israel never condemned Myanmar for its persecution of the Muslims. I don't think the Israelis who sold some the weapons to the military feel regret. As long as zionists interests are unharmed they don't care.", "677" ], [ "Some plants are weeds. Its perfectly fine to remove them and be a nature lover. Likewise for books of a certain nature.\n\nBurning books from a library written by conservative authors is an honorable thing to do. Its like removing anti-vaxx, climate change denial or other right-wing lies.\n\nI would do the same given the opportunity. If it is classified as right-wing then it doesn't belong. The problem here is that the library is wasting funds on nonsense texts.", "721" ], [ "Notice the article gave no wider context to the subject? This is an isolated example. r/Greenwashing.\n\nWe must be careful to not really on anecdotes or to cherry pick information in order to avoid coming to false conclusions. Can you see the fallacy?\n\nLet me know when 10% of power provided to New York City is sourced from renewables. Tokyo is going for 100% zero-emission buildings by 2050.\n\nIt would be handy to have a list of the current cities winning the race and a list of the 10 largest cities on Earth with their zero-emission building status. It could be updated weekly and then daily until the winner reaches their goal. If someone made a website showing this they could profit from ads as the world tunes in to see who is best.\n\n > It is [also worth stressing that](_URL_1_) in order to truly decarbonize the built environment, we must eliminate fossil fuel GHG emissions from both building operations and the embodied carbon of building materials and construction.\n\nEmbodied carbon accounts for [11% of all global emissions](_URL_0_) of greenhouse gases. All industries will race to zero-emissions of heat-trapping gases as a way to gain recognition and prestige. Green certification will represent premium.\n\n > “This is going to be a permanent energy crisis, and these energy problems will synergize with the disruptions of climate change, epidemic disease and population overshoot to produce higher orders of trouble.” – <PERSON>\n\nNotice how some countries can respond to the pandemic well and then fail to respond to climate change. Or how some countries over-react to the extreme in response to some things but not others, for example, 9/11.\n\n > “Our long-term security is threatened by a problem at least as dangerous as chemical, nuclear or biological weapons, or indeed international terrorism: human-induced climate change.” – Sir <PERSON>\n\nWe need to think of ways to make sure the mysterious elevator in the greenhouse on LOST goes down to the frozen wheel.", "637" ], [ "You can claim there is an impasse. Its not. I'm saying there isn't two sides to this. Nobody is publicly suggested we should take advice from <PERSON>.\n\n<PERSON> is not making statements about how we need to \"stop the speech\" of actresses. Don't draw false comparisons.\n\nThe person behaving like <PERSON> is the one saying \"stop the transition of power to the winner of the election\". The enablers of fascism are those who state \"not guilty\" after all the factual evidence is made clear regarding who incited insurrection. The fascists are the ones who orchestrated and conducted [insurrection](_URL_0_) on r/January6", "112" ], [ "No, I don't have a side and you don't have a side. A side of what? Debates do not consist of two parts that can equally divided down the middle. You are making up stuff. Things aren't always binary. Its not either or. Just because you have one opinion, it doesn't mean there is only one other kind of contrary opinion.\n\nYou brought up \"advice from <PERSON>\" so I mentioned advice (or lack of it) from today's leaders to make the comparison more apt.\n\nI am not suggesting that the government should burn books. I am saying that I understand why someone would destroy books they believe were conservative or right wing in nature. I am saying I agree with that individual's actions and that given the opportunity I would do the same myself. I am not saying that <PERSON> should destroy books. Can you distinguish the difference? \n\nI do not want the state to burn books, however I support the actions of this activist. Its like online content moderation. I don't want the state to ban conservatives from social media. I want big tech to kick them off, to boot the racists, the climate change denialists and the anti-vaxxers.\n\n<PERSON> is known for his attempts to hide government sources of information on climate change. How do you feel about efforts by conservatives to reduce the flow of information regarding our impact on the environment?\n\nThe answer to your last question is reality. Reality makes some opinions less valuable because they are disproven by facts.", "687" ], [ "How could a university restrict free speech? By what means? It doesn't have authority to ban certain speech so no matter what a university decrees it will not affect free speech.\n\n > “unacceptable silencing and censoring on campuses is having a chilling effect”. \n\nThis is the lie. Nobody is silenced and if they are it is their choice, just as it was <PERSON> choice to delete her tweet.\n\nProve to me there is a chilling effect and I might be persuaded there is an issue that needs addressing. I wouldn't be concerned if conservative or right-wing voices were being reduced. If that happened then that would great, normal and natural. That is what I want, not because I disagree. Its because I have determined that stuff is false. Academics should feel uncomfortable for holding conservative views because they are the wrong views. I support any and all moves which aim for the removal of right-wing views in all settings. \n\nI cannot foresee any issue with banning right-wing views. Such a ban would be appopriate and just in my opinion. There is no obligation to be open to views that are described as such.", "865" ], [ "Yes. I am certain. Take abortion. I never want to hear about restricting them. Or take gun reform. I only want to hear about restricting them. Or take climate change. I never want to hear from someone downplaying the risks.\n\nConservatives get banned because their opinions are not popular. Rejected.\n\nJust because some people want to continue going over and over these topics it doesn't mean they deserve to be heard. Sometimes people determine when a debate is over. These topics are cut and dry to me. The facts have been established.\n\nI don't believe in morality. I believe in making a better world and that precludes everything right-wing.", "348" ], [ "Limiting discourse on campus doesn't stop anyone from sharing speech elsewhere. Therefore nobody is silenced. Therefore its not a free speech issue. Free speech will reign supreme anyway.\n\nImagine actually suggesting that universities are places where thoughts are restricted. When I went to uni I encountered a large range of ideas, theories and points of view. Its perhaps one their greatest characteristics, especially the humanities where there is endless debate.\n\nI don't think the uni cares if those expressions are made elsewhere. They aren't making demands to extend their will beyond the campus. You imagine things and get angry when someone tries to explain a point of view which is incongruous with your perspective.", "865" ], [ "It appears your decision to leave was a grave mistake. We were all warned that people overseas should return home. You should have made better decisions. This is completely and totally on you.\n\nI don't want to know your situation since you left the country of your own free will. I wouldn't do that because of the climate crisis. What should alarm every single Australian is the contribution travel makes to global heating.", "1004" ], [ "Of course, rank hypocrisy. I never believed in the idea of cancel culture. Its just freedom.\n\n<PERSON> even started to try to cancel Faux News via Twitter when they wouldn't follow in his extremist footsteps. Dixie Chicks also come to mind. r/kotakuinaction2 are forever calling for boycotts against companies for depicting fictional characters they don't like.", "828" ], [ "> Tourism operators are reeling\n\nSo what? What does that mean? Why would I care? It wouldn't bother me what effect lockdowns have on business. I never consider that. A few weeks after this lockdown things will return to normal without any harm occurring. What might be different is the number of people who return a profit from their business this financial year. I don't care about that trivial book-keeping stuff. It is of no consequence. One business closes down, another opens up. If you take a gamble running your own business you get to keep the profits but you also have to take on the burden of risk.\n\nTourism operators rely on people who burn a fossil fuel to get around. That is very wrong. I don't approve. I don't want any industry that depends on people dumping heat-trapping gases in my atmosphere to advance. I want those industries to contract. That is what will bring the most enduring prosperity.\n\nConsumer confidence needs shaking up. Our economics are very wasteful and inefficient. Its not a disaster when someone's expectations of profit are thwarted. Real disaster causes pain and suffering, not just economic loss.\n\nForget the struggling businesses. Someone else dreaming of profit will come along to provide a good or service and if you get needy yourself head on down to Centrelink.", "801" ], [ "Please no [appeals to emotion](_URL_0_). What would my caring achieve? I can only assume that since you replied without attempting to answer my questions that you have no answer.\n\nThere is never a reason to care about business prospects. Thousands of businesses go bankrupt every day. Should I shed a tear for each business that goes under or just for ones affected by lockdowns?\n\nIf you had a reason for me to show empathy and compassion you would have just provided a reason. You didn't, because there is no reason. We have a strong welfare safety net in Australia. It has been strengthened during the pandemic for exactly these reasons.\n\nI don't want pussies like <PERSON> ruining Australia with a deliberate do nothing approach. I want strong leaders taking decisive action to prevent covid19 taking hold here. Then I want the same strong responsive action on climate change, no matter the social or economic impacts.", "801" ], [ "Notice how Human Rights Watch only attribute censorship to authorities. Why? Because they comprehend that only authority may censor. They understand what rights are.\n\nHRW understands that what happens on social media is nothing compared to the unjustness stemming from a government policy that locks up dissidents or uses the pandemic to squelch protest. \n\n > Since January 2020, governments in at least [24 countries](_URL_0_) have enacted vague laws and measures that criminalize spreading alleged misinformation or other coverage of Covid-19, or of other public health crises, which the authorities claim threaten the public’s well-being.\n\nThis will be interesting to see how it plays out because climate change has been raised as a public health matter. That means climate change denial could be targeted down the track. That would be great if these sites don't moderate that false information themselves.\n\nI 💗 free speech and online content moderation.", "106" ], [ "As I type someone could be stepping off a plane with [a variant of covid19](_URL_0_) which is 100% more infectious or has some other insidious attribute. Since we don't know how infectious a new strain might be its better to be overly cautious.\n\nIf I was the premier of the next state to enter a lockdown because covid19 spread from hotel quarantine I would close my state to international arrivals. Then the federal government would have to take more responsibility. The deputy pm may have realised that himself recently, hence his support for discussing alternatives.", "110" ], [ "Its about \"a company reaching a point where it decided it could no longer have a working relationship with someone\".\n\nIts about \"a capitalist company attempted to distance itself from controversy and keep its brand as clean as possible\".\n\nIf Disney hadn't acted and then she continued with more extreme comments then Disney might have lost customers.\n\n > <PERSON>’s free speech wasn’t violated. She is not being cancelled. She is not a victim of snowflakes and “woke” culture. She is not a free speech martyr. <PERSON> made a dumb comparison and she paid the price. Disney held <PERSON> accountable for her words and actions, that’s all.\n\nHolding people to account is a great thing.", "402" ], [ "Many rural and remote parts of the country were only developed last century. The history of my state, [Queensland](_URL_0_), is typical. Settlers move in, grab the best land, log and then begin to experiment with primary industries depending on climate and other local factors like access to transport. We also had a railway boom at the end of the 19th century, a few gold rushes and several disastrous floods.\n\nMaybe check out the history of [mining in Australia](_URL_2_). Also check out [trove](_URL_1_). You can search through past newspapers and whole bunch of documents for specific subjects as well as local history.", "426" ], [ "Notice the small list of grievances? Total thought control initiative.\n\n*errant anti-Israel tweets - Israel is to be praised, uncriticised and bowed down to or Israel must be respected.\n\n*<PERSON> post on Anzac Day - ANZAC day must be respected and so too should the troops.\n\n*Triple J moving its annual Hottest 100 - Australia day is good and must be respected.\n\n*company tax cuts - These are good and must be respected.\n\nI have always found <PERSON> infantile and his murmurings easily discredited.", "763" ], [ "Dumb question. Government do lots of things. For example, the building you are or were last in had codes that specify how that structure needs to be built to reach a standard. So the answer to your stupid question is safety standards. They apply on roads too and most forms of transport. The manufacture of the device you are using to read and write to Reddit is also built according to various standards.", "38" ], [ "Yes. Its cool isn't it. The people paying for the services they use, gaining advantage from safety standards as well as law and order and a plethora of other benefits.\n\nI am saying I don't give two fucks about this cash ban. They aren't taking away any freedom dumbo. Anyone can pay more electronically.\n\nPlease don't reply. You don't understand basic facts on the matter. Instead I want you to reflect more on what government does for the common good. Run along now.", "170" ], [ "Any BPay bill can be payed with crypto at [Living Room of Satoshi](_URL_1_). You could use the convenience of a low-free credit card and then use this website to pay your monthly credit card bill. If you use Bitcoin Cash there is no fee to transact.\n\n[Cryptonize](_URL_0_) allows you to pay for anything online with Bitcoin Cash. I haven't used it yet. There are a growing number of magical places in cyberspace.", "71" ], [ "Part of the mainstream, government/media status quo. Part of the problem, a non-dissenter, on-message, don't rock the boat type. For example has she ever called up <PERSON> and his destructive lies about the \"carbon tax\"? She probably gave <PERSON> a verbal \"gentle pat down\" over his disgraces. Meanwhile the country goes down the drain, she has a nice income and a high profile. I am glad the ABC has strong assertive women like her and <PERSON> but its not effective.", "840" ], [ "[In 2017 the average annual wage was $81,619](_URL_0_). At the lower end, the average accommodation and food services employees drew a salary of $57,870. Heaps. I wouldn't be interested in complaints about wages above $50,000.\n\nTo me that is fine and dandy and plenty and I do not care less about wage growth in Australia. Its just a big whinge about nothing from nobodies who want more stuff. If that isn't enough change your expensive lifestyle. Cut back.", "392" ], [ "Plenty enough. [Lots of shoppers](_URL_0_). No wage growth problem in Australia at all. Plenty of money for workers. Total non-issue.\n\n[CPI was lower than wages](_URL_1_). The wage price index went up 2 per cent in the last year and consumer price inflation went up 1.9 per cent. \n\nNext bogus talking point is what now?", "73" ], [ "When the price is surging up 10% an hour it feels good but that doesn't happen often, only a few times a year. I understand its not for everyone and I wouldn't put all my discretionary money into it. It does have some benefits and can be very useful.\n\nI attribute the downvoting to an anti-crypto vibe which I don't get at all. I see the bigger picture with the average low income aussie scrambling for a few dollars more that will be eroded away by inflation in a few years. 🙄\n\nBTW: I hold no crypto.", "1008" ], [ "As of criminals is what I was referring to, as in the definition. Carbon criminals for example. I want criminal law to expand to include the management of fossil fuel companies over the last 50 years. These people are criminally negligent because they took no responsibility for the outcome of their product's use.\n\nI never use the word evil because its theological. Thanks for the reply but I was after some answers as to what is the problem with surveillance technology to round up criminals. I don't mind law enforcement.", "314" ], [ "We can see the government offers no solution to global heating at all. Can /u/silence7 see it now? Latest reports are that Australia's emissions have risen. The only thing that will save us from global heating is for the people who burn oil, coal and natural gas to stop doing so.\n\n<PERSON> and <PERSON> visit airports all the time. <PERSON> does the same thing when she says don't wreck the planet, then proceeds to hop on plane. Creepy <PERSON> does the same thing on his private jets. <PERSON> hopes on a private jet and tells everyone carbon capture will save the day.\n\nDegenerates. Destroying the planet.", "637" ], [ "No, never owned a car and avoid them as much as possible. From next year I will avoid fossil fueled private vehicles in all circumstances except emergency. I traveled by plane in the 1990s a handful of times, never again. I have no children and no plans to. I quit red meats last year and continue to eat less meat. I have no pets, never have, except for a small time looking after an unwanted pet bird. I always vote 1 Australian Greens who have supported 100% renewable energy. My carbon footprint in tiny, especially for someone living in a developed, car-dependent country like Australia.\n\nThose people are choosing to make shitloads of carbon pollution by their air travel. <PERSON> is a great example. Here is a man who has traveled the world countless time and probably has a carbon footprint 10s of thousands of times greater than mine. What a loser. He did exactly what he should not have done in order to preserve the things he cherishes.\n\n[If you care, you stop flying](_URL_0_). There is no skirting around it. Frequent flyers are carbon pollution monsters. What I did was to respond to the climate science when it was established in the 1990s. I stopped discharging carbon pollution into the atmosphere. We all have to come to terms with the consequences of combusting oil, coal and natural gas.", "637" ], [ "What is the bet that <PERSON> will hop a plane numerous times every week up until the election. What a hypocrite! How could someone pretending to care about the environment visit airports so often? That doesn't make sense. Its like saying \"to save the planet from carbon pollution I must make more carbon pollution\".\n\n<PERSON> is a carbon pollution monster, just like frequent flyers <PERSON> and <PERSON>. When will these people come to terms with the carbon pollution they generate?", "771" ], [ "No. Nobody has to ever hop on a plane unless its a life saving emergency. It is exactly like <PERSON> is \"driving H3's and throwing his trash out the window.\" Exactly like that. <PERSON> is a fraud who relies on making copious quantities of carbon pollution for his career, for his personal benefit.\n\nIf he wanted to be influential he would say I am not flying because of the carbon pollution. Likewise for <PERSON>, for <PERSON> and for <PERSON>, but they don't. <PERSON> should lead by example instead of being a hypocrite. He could tell the world that the best thing to do to stop global heating is to not fly and to criticize those who do that. Instead he does other things for his political career, like promoting himself and he makes the planet hotter because of the carbon emissions he generates.\n\nYou can't expect someone who leaves litter around the place to effectively prevent litter. You can't expect a drug dealer to lead a crackdown on drugs. He is supposed to not have a large carbon footprint or he is a hypocrite with no solution.\n\n<PERSON>! You must address your own carbon pollution before you demand the same from others. Mustn't you?", "771" ], [ "What do you mean the [Deepwater Horizon disaster](_URL_0_) is resolved? None of the science presumes Earth to be a static system. Where did you get this idea from? Perhaps you should read [this article](_URL_1_) about Earth's energy budget.\n\nAll of the regulations binding fossil fuel production have been useful and beneficial. Can you imagine what the world would be like if we had no laws for air quality or refinery processing standards?\n\nYou seem to think that a single report about microorganisms eating plastic means the problem is solved. I can be happy as larry without straws, like nearly everyone else of the planet. That means your quality of life point is invalid. Likewise I don't require air travel or a large family to have a good quality of life.\n\nWe aren't speculating about global heating anymore. We are making direct observations of its effects.", "380" ], [ "Just think of global heating as a trap. We are all trapped in an oven which is turned on. What have we done with tobacco smokers? We create bans and make restrictions to reduce harm. It will be the same with fossil fuels. I don't know why you emphasize some potential, negative economic consequences of climate change when not mitigating is expected to be very costly and disruptive.\n\nChina's air quality is disgusting and people are suffering. You aren't paying attention to the details. You aren't recognizing the unprecedented nature of events such as the wildfires in CA. You seem to be cherry picking observations to suit your bias. The threat to quality of life comes from the chaos from runaway climate change, not from mitigation. I couldn't care less about economic loss from mitigation. You seem to be stuck on a false dilemma. If we decarbonise smartly the economic disruption can be contained. The longer we let heat-trapping gases accumulate the greater the disruption. The solution to global heating will necessarily be inconvenient for some. I have suggested that people not focus on specific predictions too.\n\nI suggest you search for \"climate change effects\" at [Science Direct](_URL_2_) and then download them with [Sci-Hub](_URL_0_). Its the pace of the changes that is most problematic. Its not common sense to just hope some random development will solve a problem because the world is dynamic place. We don't do health care like that. We don't rely on building construction that way. We listen to experts when they warn us about our foundations and well-being.\n\nThe article explains that its an imbalance in a dynamic system which is the fundamental problem, not some misunderstanding about our changing world. Fuel efficiency is not really a solution since the efficiency brings cost reductions. That saved money is then spent on products and services which require energy so overall there is no net gain. Maybe you could search [this page](_URL_1_) of quotations for \"climate\" for clarification on my perspective.\n\nAlso that was the longest reply I have received at Reddit. I am glad you are interested in the topic.", "637" ], [ "Say something stupid [because](_URL_1_) \n\n > The [petroleum industry in Russia](_URL_0_) is one of the largest in the world. Russia has the largest reserves, and is the largest exporter, of natural gas. It has the second largest coal reserves, the eighth largest oil reserves, and is the largest exporter, or second largest exporter of oil in the world in absolute numbers.\n\nGreat strategy!", "629" ], [ "The future is never certain, however we have enough certainty to know better than to wreck a stable climate. We all share the one atmosphere. We can't destroy it.\n\nI recommend you try to condense your writing. I learned to do so through my contributions to Wikipedia where summary prose is preferred. Since you mentioned a background in economics [here](_URL_0_) is a condensed version of my favourite economics quotes.", "1018" ], [ "Things are normal for me in South East Queensland. I try to keep apart of other people when I am out but because we are 98% sure no community transmission is spreading its just the last set of restrictions that have to be lifted and otherwise I am care free about it, even though I am in a vulnerable group. There is no mask mandate here because its not needed.\n\nTo be honest whatever the last restrictions are at the moment it wouldn't bother me if they stayed forever. I don't even feel the need to pay attention to the details anymore.\n\nAustralia's lockdowns have been great and effective.", "110" ], [ "Subsidizing the correct industries is key. It helps make lots of individuals behave more nicely.\n\nThe correlation is that some important outdoor work installing much needed utilities continues during extraordinary times. Many Indians would probably feel about electronic gadgets the same way I felt in the 1980s when there was no internet, consoles, phones and few computers. If people can get more electricity from their roof it will make any extra time spent at home due to covid19 more comfortable.\n\nAs the article explains new large-scale installations are down around 90% due to a general decline in demand.", "731" ], [ "I'm seeing a few posts about trivial weather events or things which aren't significant in the bigger picture. While I am not concerned about it be mindful that green subs could be targeted by shillbots looking for angles or attack vectors that generate fear, uncertainty and doubt by confecting outage over trivial yet engaging stuff.\n\nI mean can you imagine the posts if we allowed satire and memes here?", "434" ], [ "If I recall correctly at the last federal election I received an advertisement for the liberal party candidate on an internet speed checking app shortly after the nbn arrived but during the period when advertising on tv is banned.\n\n > [Blackout laws](_URL_0_) come into place the Wednesday night before polling day, and stay in place until voting is over on Saturday night. \n\nThere are no coincidences in politics.", "636" ], [ "I liked to mix with the harmonic number and not with auto-key. I don't like the current default view indicating this key matches this track. Tapping p to temporarily pause a track for alignment is useful as is right clicking on eq parts instead of turning knob up and down. Tapping + and - was useful too.\n\nI liked it when the default was to remember gain adjustment for each track. The default pitch adjustment % was previously too high; its good now. I think its easier to mix with the zoomed out waveform now. The ideal mix point is distinguished with more reliability.\n\nThe Tag editor is useful. I'm just starting to get into filters. I haven't used looping much because its not intuitive. Last play column has been useful for tracklists.\n\nThe latest version inspired a [new mix](_URL_0_). When the sync button didn't align perfectly and I had to zoom in it wasn't as easy to realign as I was expecting but I am not sure if that was because the change was new.\n\nI think the mix of effects, customizations and options is good now. Don't overwhelm the user.", "785" ], [ "That is no reason to care. I don't care because whatever is removed from one site can shared at another. Only authority may censor so this isn't censorship.\n\nWatch out! Youtube will get you and your thoughts especially if you have right wing views.\n\n > You need to get help man. Seriously stop commenting on my posts you're killing this sub for me. \n\nHelp for what? Why would you ask me stop to commenting? Weird.\n\nThis sub died a long time ago.", "621" ], [ "I like this topic. I like commenting about these things. Don't you like my comments? Are they the wrong kind of comments for you? Are you disapproving of my free speech?\n\n > I've never seen you say anything positive\n\nDon't lie. I don't believe you. I can't see the relevance of your opinion on my likeability. Why are you asking questions about me? You seem befuddled about something. Lets discuss ideas, not people.", "837" ], [ "Brainless. Can you leave? That state is up there like Texas and Ohio with the crazy shit.\n\nAmericans just had to put things on hold properly for a little while to get back to normal quicker. It wasn't that difficult to understand. New Zealand, Australia and parts of Asia get it.\n\nI blame <PERSON>. Many people will come after him for his grave failures.", "644" ], [ "Save free speech from what exactly? \"Big Social Media Companies\" do not regulate speech in the “virtual public square”. This is something you imagine.\n\nMy speech is free even if I don't agree with big tech companies like Facebook and Twitter. I don't agree with them so I don't sign up. Its my choice. Freedom.\n\nI don't agree with Faux News or Sky News so I don't watch them.\n\nLots of people agree with these companies so they keep using them. Freedom. They have the liberty to stop using these services at any time.\n\nHow would we know what works at the state level and what doesn't work? Who will be determining if speech is free or not?\n\n > We just need it to apply to social media providers\n\nThis the crux of the \"big tech censors\" debate. What you mean by that is that we need the government to make speech free when I agree with that speech. You imply they need to agree with you on what free speech is for it to work.\n\nWe know what free speech is. Free speech is speech that does not require government approval. Can you comprehend this self-contradiction? You want to be the censor because you perceive someone is censoring you, when really they just disagree with you.", "106" ], [ "Education plays a role but I will always resent actions which lead to a deterioration in the climate. The effects of climate change impact many ecosystems. Its not hard to find evidence without vast journeys. We send satellites into orbit to make observations. We can travel lots, just as long as we get by without generating heat in the atmosphere.", "269" ], [ "If speech is removed (moderated) from youtube it is still free speech because it can be shared elsewhere. No harm done. Those expressions are not restricted. For example, <PERSON> can still communicate with others despite his 2018 deplatforming. No slippery slope.\n\nI support private entities managing their private property as they see fit. If you don't agree then use an alternative.\n\nYes, Twitter does things I don't like so I don't go to that site. Its not complicated. Is that clear? I support Twitter and Youtube removing what they want like I support Reddit removing content. That doesn't mean I support discrimination against a minority.", "106" ], [ "Cool, you have a view on rights. You also like to label people and then tell yourself you know what people believe and that you know more. Now you are fabricating some imaginary \"moral authority\".\n\nI'm not a moralist. Its not about being wrong or right. Its not a fight for truthiness. Its about making things better. The managers at these sites have different views on the management of a website to you. You aren't required to agree. Your permission or approval is immaterial. If you think you can do better then do so.\n\nI am not bringing any kind of specific thinking to free speech. First I don't subscribe to anything. I come to my own conclusions independently.\n\n > essentially supersedes and infringes on the right to free speech\n\nNo. It doesn't. That right remains valid and intact, just like the right to marriage remains even if someone rejects your marriage proposal. A rejection doesn't mean the person is thought of as offensive. Again that is not what I believe regarding hate speech. I don't find offense to words.\n\nIf I tell someone that they can't say the word \"<PERSON>\" on my property they still have the right to say <PERSON>. Don't they? That right to free speech remains, whether or not I permit that speech on my property.\n\nYou are going to have to accept that there are conditions of use and that permission to conduct yourself in certain ways is required, just like at Reddit. Why do you come to Reddit if Reddit is a moral authority harming free speech?\n\nDon't worry about \"a sense of authority\" so much. I don't care about anti-gay. That is just stupid shit like <PERSON>. I just want that nonsense gone. I don't want to spend time correcting shills on climate change, just like I never want to hear bullshit from <PERSON>. I just want their nonsense deleted and for that stupid shit to diminish.\n\nI know you just assumed I was ranting. What did you think was happening in the UK? If you don't mind could you try to reply to my questions from my last comment.\n\nWhat makes you think someone's right to free speech has been violated? What are you worried about? Try to mention something real and tangible.\n\n > It’s a pretty dangerous precedent.\n\nDangerous? Danger from what, of what and to whom? What minorities? Remember this is what you claimed and this is what I am responding to.\n\nAre the big tech stock prices still plummeting? Nope. Is ANTIFA designated as a terrorist organisation now? Nope.", "865" ], [ "Appallingly bad headline. It fabricates two metaphors (a pendulum and a movement in a leftward direction) and conflates a third thing (internet censorship with content moderation) instead of responding to reality. If you get more real you don't have to use these figures of speech.\n\nIt doesn't matter what or who Facebook or Twitter suspends, ever. It can never have significance or bearing. Its just the same triviality as to what or who my neighbours allow on their property.\n\nSuck shit World Socialist Website. You were stupid enough to use Facebook in the first place. You deserve what you got from Facebook because you made a poor decision to use Facebook. My belief is that its better if less people use Facebook and Twitter.\n\nNotice the trash article mentions \"shitlibs\" and \"the left\".", "106" ], [ "Notice [how <PERSON> behaved](_URL_0_) after his talk with <PERSON>.\n\n > Why <PERSON> decided to pursue such an intervention immediately after a call to the White House remains a mystery.\n\nNow I understand why China held the Australian coal ships at sea and let the power go off. It was about sending a message to others that China will be willing to make sacrifices to defend its territory. Its not about blame for covid19 or a phony \"trade war\". These are the smokescreens for the real war.\n\nUnless I have missed it Australian politicians have invested little political capital in defending Taiwan. If they had plans to do so then its a little late in the game for that. Its probable we will just mindlessly follow the USA into war, especially with a weak and ineffectual opposition.\n\nOnce another oil refinery closes in Australia China will get its way. With refined petroleum products cut off our remaining supplies (\\~5% of demand) will go towards essential services and a possible war effort.\n\nIf we support a war with China over Taiwan, China will shut down oil supply to Australia and go without our coal and ore. Shipping to Australia for a huge range of manufactured products would decline. Would <PERSON> support shipping refined oil to Australia now he is moving away from fossil fuels?\n\nI support Taiwan's independence however I don't want to see Australia decline because of foreigners warring and yet I also want us to reduce trade with China and get off oil.\n\nI wouldn't support military intervention. We should move to disengage from China as much as possible because China is the world's largest emitter of carbon pollution. That means the more trade we do with China, the less prosperous we become.", "753" ], [ "I would never treat a <PERSON> supporter as an equal. Undoubtedly. I would just dismiss their opinion point blank. Yes, exactly. I place a value of zero on that speech. I do the same everytime a right wing ideologue shares their speech or every time a religious person shares their opinion.\n\nI would do the same if someone was going on about racial supremacy as well, and if someone suggests that LGBTI people should be discriminated against, then again I would rate that speech as valueless. That means I visit /r/TuckerCarlson or /r/Conservative only to downvote all the valueless posts.\n\nSo /u/o_O-JBL wants to describe me as a toxic, postmodernist liberal authoritarian. He thinks that is a contribution to the discussion. Weird.", "294" ], [ "There is no right to post something on Reddit. You have no clue. The OP gets it. The image is now deleted. Nearly all screenshots are shitposts. Anyone can do that. It takes no effort.\n\nIf you want a website filled with nonsense you are more than welcome to host your own. However you don't do that. Instead you come to a moderation-based website with a moral authority (mods). Huh?\n\nWhy aren't you building your utopian free speech forum instead? What are you doing here?", "126" ], [ "[These suckers](_URL_0_) should have stayed home. I would never travel by plane during a climate crisis.\n\nWe must close our borders up and shut down international travel if we want to protect Australia from both covid19 and global heating.\n\nIf farmers can't find the labour with our borders closed then they must offer better wages and improve conditions and then ask more for their produce. If they can't manage to do that then get someone managing the land who can.\n\nNo extensions to JobKeeper. Get rid of that wasteful subsidy. Its not the government's job to ensure certain industries are viable. Let's not artificially inflate wages using government handouts. We have welfare for the needy. \n\nThe tourism industry had to collapse anyways because it depended on fossil fuel combustion. See ya beef cattle raisers, bye bye coal industry. Its time to plant trees.", "801" ], [ "Yes, okay if you want to describe me that way you can but its not really significant or relevant.\n\nI decide that I don't want to hear or see things. I decide which sites and apps to use. That is called freedom.\n\nIts like when I vote up or down at Reddit. That is how Reddit works. Can you accept that? Reality, like when society said no to porn it then faced restrictions too. Reality. Harmful content is moderated.\n\nStop dictating to me that I must accept speech that I don't appreciate, that I don't want shared. Its like you are forcing porn on people who don't want to see or hear it. If you want to experience the world with un-moderated speech then you are welcome to move on to greener pastures, but you don't. You keep returning to the moderated Reddit because you know moderation is good. You accept the authority and then whinge and whine. Its boring.\n\nTobacco was popular, then knowledge of the harm it generated spread and tobacco faced restrictions. Its quite common for society to react and to suppress that which it determines is harmful.\n\nI'm not violating anyone's civil liberties or rendering anyone's speech useless. Again you confect something false to confirm your belief. You resort to our theoretical imaginations instead of responding to my comments. You are talking past me.", "126" ], [ "I believe in your right to marriage. That doesn't mean everyone you want to marry has to agree with you. Does it? Why not? Because marriage requires the agreement of another person. Marriage is like using these websites.\n\nPosting content on big tech platforms requires their agreement. Alternatively you can make your own if you are so privileged.\n\nSo even though you have a right to marriage your marriage proposal can be declined. The right to free speech is akin to the right to marry. At any time users may stop using these services and at any time a marriage may come to an end should those bound by agreement descend into conflict.\n\nI do get to block (or at least moderate) the speech that I dislike. I press mute on advertisements and use adblockers. I deny the approval of the state by ignoring its copyright regime and so forth.\n\nYou are fighting for the right to be heard. That is not free speech.", "83" ], [ "Its all in his head. Fuck knows what he is talking about.\n\n > A [criminal complaint filed](_URL_0_) against <PERSON> accuses him of conspiring with others “to use social media platforms, including Twitter, to disseminate fraudulent messages designed to encourage supporters of one of the presidential candidates (the “Candidate”) to “vote” via text message or social media and thus to fail to cast their ballots in a legally valid manner.” \n\nIt is fraud. Get the fraudsters. Lock them up. Don't go online and spread lies. I can see how sharing false information about elections is interfering with or infringing on the right to vote. Less false information regarding elections and politics in general means more freedom because the authority that emerges from elections will then more accurately represent the will of the people.\n\nLess memes is better. Hopefully Reddit can get rid of them. I place a value of zero on memes. My preference is for Reddit to not share memes. I nearly always vote memes down without even attempting to discern what convoluted message they were trying to convey.\n\nNow if you want to express yourself with memes at imgur then I say go for it. I say enjoy your free speech over there, not here.", "103" ], [ "This was a silly screed full of bunkum and what not. ⬇️ The author doesn't seem to understand that people vote down falsehoods and that I will always vote down what I believe is false.\n\nShe wants to pretend that speech for speech's sake has value. She wants to pretend that communication is just a one-way process where the speaker says whatever they want when and where they want.\n\n > they should be free to express whatever views they want without the threat of cancellation \n\nNo. They shouldn't, just like you, I and all Reddit users should not wish death towards other users. The author is overly concerned about access to social media when we are dazzled by choices but then wants to ignore all the negative consequences of sharing false information when clearly the anti-vaxx crowd and the insurrectionists, who were deluded into violent revolution, have both caused lasting harm.", "247" ], [ "Yes, long threads can be tedious.\n\nNo. I don't believe in your mass silencing. This is something you have imagined.\n\nI advocate for freedom. Come back to Earth. Nobodies' mouth is sewn shut. Go to infowars and read every opinion from <PERSON> you want. This is despite his 2018 deplatforming. So no fear. 🛑 Stop the free speech and \"big tech censorship\" lies.\n\nWith one clear example your whole argument is disproved. <PERSON> is sharing his speech with no problems. There are thousands and thousands of ways he is able to share his speech. Millions of voices like his are currently sharing their speech, moderated but not censored. Only authority may censor and users visit these sites of their volition.\n\nIf you want to express yourself in certain ways consent from others is sometimes required. Censorship is when that consent is derived from an authority.\n\nThe shitshow about politics online is the stupid rhetoric about \"the left\".\n\nThere are not two sides to politics. That is the stupid idea. The \"us versus them\" mentality is a manipulation while the real wrong-doers get away. The left/right narrative is subversive cover-up.", "106" ], [ "<PERSON>'s campaign has been revealed as a criminal enterprise with many of his associates incarcerated. As President he committed crimes to cover up his treasonous fraud. Impeachment is nigh. The world is facing a climate disaster, Iran will be attacked soon for Israel and a <PERSON> recession is likely. Your voting system has big security holes. Right wing extremism is getting out of hand.", "693" ], [ "Yes. I have experienced bans. I have been banned from subs at Reddit. I have been banned on Breitbart.\n\nNotice at Wikipedia there are only pages for left wing politics and right wing politics. Its a classification of belief systems along a spectrum. It is not a group of people.\n\nAOC is winning. I don't know what you mean by her stupidity. The Green New Deal is exactly what the US needs and the concentration camps are disgusting.", "728" ], [ "What do you mean by \"the left\" and \"the right\"? You do know these things don't actually exist, don't you?\n\nI don't like conservative beliefs so I don't mind if they are moderated to high hell, at all, in the slightest. These companies cannot decide what people consume since they can only control their platforms. Just take <PERSON>. He is still making all the free speech he wants at infowars.", "965" ], [ "One thing is for sure. Having a climate conference generates a lot of carbon pollution. We have had a lot of climate conferences now, hundreds. Carbon emissions are still going up, years and years later. No solution to climate change through having a conference. ❌ International conferences are for losers.\n\n > The leaders of Commonwealth countries will gather next year in Rwanda for a week-long summit\n\nThat will create even more carbon pollution. ❌ No solution to climate change there. Prince <PERSON> hopes things can be solved. Could someone tell the anointed one hope isn't required, that instead the people burning oil, coal and natural gas, like these conference attendees traveling by plane, need to stop doing so.\n\nThese international conferences and all like them only create more carbon pollution. ❌ <PERSON> is like <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON>. Frauds with no solutions, only copious quantities of greenhouse gases in their wake.\n\n > The Prince has long spoken about his deep concern for the future of the planet\n\nHis talks haven't achieved anything. Climate change threatens everything and the species extinction rate is high. The time is passed for being hopeful or for talking about it. The monarchy must act to save the kingdom. Apparently Prince <PERSON> mumsy has some power. What is the bet she does nothing in her powers to stop climate change.", "687" ], [ "In Australia the Governor General represents the monarchy. They can help ensure that those who conduct the affairs of the nation do so strictly in accordance with the Constitution and the laws of the Commonwealth and with [due regard to the public interest](_URL_0_). It could easily be argued that anything less than radically deep and rapid reductions in fossil fuel use is against the public interest.\n\nThe Prince should get the Queen to direct the Australian Governor General to do everything they can to cut fossil fuel use to save her kingdom. Why hasn't Prince <PERSON> told us he begged his mother to do something like this? Instead he speaks out to the public to make himself appear caring when he could be taking real action to save the place. Fraud.", "771" ], [ "XR must ensure that there is radically deep and rapid reductions in fossil fuel use. That is the only just, sane, moral, ethical and intellectually superior path forward. Anything contrary to this is unjust, insane, immoral, unethical and stupid.\n\nAll the people combusting oil, coal and natural gas must cease doing so. XR must disrupt major airports such as Heathrow and interrupt carbon polluters as they go about their business.", "637" ], [ "You could say anything done for any good cause has had a positive impact. I am saying that is not the case in any circumstance if that activity creates carbon pollution, for example, traveling by plane for 100,000s of kilometres. The ends never do not justify the means. In the case of combusting fossil fuels the rest of the planet is burdened with around 60 times more heat from the gases swirling around above our heads, than from its initial combustion.", "637" ], [ "My mistake. I wasn't paying attention. I can see you have a very good understanding of how futile energy efficiency can be.\n\n > “Every gain in energy-efficiency has been undercut by an increase in the use of energy.” – <PERSON> \n > \n > “Efforts to improve efficiency are subject to diminishing returns, and a point will be reached at which reduced energy availability will translate to reduced economic activity. This is problematic given the fact that most economies are currently based on the need for perpetual growth. Industrialised societies will have to forego further conventional economic growth in favour of a costly transition to alternative energy sources.” - <PERSON>", "637" ], [ "I agree that targeting FIRE industries is a good idea. Introduce chaos into their systems. Chaos upsets markets because fear, uncertainty and doubt emerge from it. The other neat thing about chaos theory is that it explains how small initial changes can bring about large unpredictable disruptions. We must introduce some feedback into the system that will create a tipping point where everything unravels.\n\nI can recommend [Chaos](_URL_0_) by <PERSON> and [Next: The Future Just Happened](_URL_1_) by <PERSON> to inspire ideas on how individuals can make chaos that disrupts industry.", "795" ], [ "I mostly agree however I would mention the organisation is only 8 months old atm. If things don't seem to be turning around by October 2020 then you may see various sub groups offshoot. I would hate to see XR follow the Occupy Movement's failures and spiral into irrelevance and relative obscurity.\n\nAnother thing to consider is that the recent funding announcement could be used to offset legal bills by protestors.", "0" ], [ "Whatever issue you have with this type of thing it doesn't matter to me. Just because you don't want to say a particularly word to describe something it doesn't mean your free speech is violated. If I visit a friend and they say you cannot express support for \"the left\" that doesn't mean my speech is violated. It means my friend has a preference.\n\nPolitical correctness is about being accurate and inclusive. Of course it is free speech. Its not the government ordering people to do something. This is a hospital management decision of no consequence beyond that institution.\n\nI don't care about whatever reason someone is opposed to this. That whining and bitching is nothing.", "865" ], [ "> compelled speech\n\nIts important to note the difference between hospital policy and a law that affects everyone with real punishment. Can you make out the distinction?\n\n > [Compelled speech](_URL_0_) is a transmission of expression required by law. Just as freedom of speech protects free expression, in many cases it similarly protects an individual from being required to utter or otherwise express a thought with which they disagree. \n\nIf someone is vehemently against this policy they are free to find alternative employment.\n\nI'm rejecting your mob rule. If I am a slave who is my master?", "865" ], [ "Its not weird and its not a lack of empathy. I have plenty of that for the deserving. I have empathy for the victims of climate change, not people spreading covid19 or discharging heat-trapping gases in my atmosphere as they engage in needless travel.\n\nI don't recommend using Facebook. I think its a hideous thing. If you are stupid enough to use Facebook then suffer the consequences and watch me not care.\n\nIts like traffic jams. I don't drive so I haven't been stuck in traffic once in the last decade. I laugh at the people stuck in traffic jams. Suckers.", "611" ], [ "I admit I bow down to mother nature. Since its truly wondrous I feel it deserves my devotion.\n\nThose ANTIFA mobs ganging up on dinners were a bit much. I wouldn't have tolerated that myself. I reject that mob's rule. I don't see ANTIFA as a whole in the same way however. I support their goals but its not a movement I would personally get involved in. Its too fuzzy. You are too quick to lump me in with the others. I'm more of an /r/ExtinctionRebellion type. Their message and actions have clarity.\n\nWhat sort of person would be so twisted that they are unwilling to use the word chestfeeding? ☺️ Just submit or move on instead of carrying on silly. While you theorize on the end of the world because of leftists I think in the end you will find that the chestfeeders are going to be fine.", "815" ], [ "Yes, they have decided how to manage their site. I should hope so. Its okay if you don't agree with their management. No-one is forcing you to use Twitter.\n\nHow is this different to Reddit? We have mods moderating some views with their bias in one sub and others moderating content with an opposing bias. In the end its all free speech, so its all good. \n\nTwitter and other mainstream sites have been moderating content according to the principle of harm reduction while sharing speech freely. Remember whatever is removed from one site can be freely shared elsewhere so our free speech remains intact no matter the actions of a web site.", "106" ], [ "On what planet would action in 15 years be considered fast? Mercury. Is it momentum or business as usual?\n\nNotice that the commitments to emissions reduction by 2050 are always net-zero emissions. That means the more governments can find (or fabricate) carbon sinks the more business as usual can continue.\n\nJust like excuses to go to war or excuses to not set up inquiries into corruption are peddled around, fake information will be confected about carbon sinks. This is on top of the lack of knowledge we have about fugitive emissions.\n\nInstead of dreaming of better ways to get from point A to point B we doesn't OP dream of reasons to stay at point A?", "78" ], [ "What makes you so sure that you have to shout it? Why is it free speech? Use a reason and then some logic.\n\nIts free speech because no authority dictated anything to anyone. These parties no doubt had a contractual agreement that included matters of separation, therefore free speech. Sharing speech like other activities, has consequences. If the state does not make the consequences as a result of its functioning then free speech is facilitated most often by cooperation in a market of competitive services. That is my experience in regard to agreement so I agree there is nothing to be concerned about from this dismissal.\n\nLucasfilm is a company. Companies are not authorities. This is a private arrangement between Lucasfilm and the actress who later deleted the tweet.", "106" ], [ "Think of transgenderism like Christmas; a time for acceptance and giving. More transgenderism might mean less babies so I can dig that aspect as the movement grows in line with more liberalism.\n\nWhat if it becomes an industry? Would you support it on the basis of economic freedom?\n\nWhat if someone develops a drug that lets you grow boobs for a few months. Wouldn't it be fun to try that, dress up and prank people?", "390" ], [ "A thirty year building plan is not an appropriate response to the emergency. Three decades more of carbon pollution is too extreme. It will end is disaster that is endured for generations.\n\n > “Allowing resource depletion and biosphere degradation to terminate economic growth will produce catastrophe.” - <PERSON> \n > \n > \"The origins of the cataclysm lay in the utopian endeavor of economic liberalism to set up a self-regulating market system.\" - <PERSON>", "795" ], [ "Mention wokeness, cancel culture or virtue signalling and I just dismiss it. <PERSON> should have been smarter. I assume her manager would have mentioned the clauses in her contract that relate to this kind of thing. She probably has been spoken to by someone from Disney about what speech she shares.\n\nHer character should be replaced with a hot, masculine gay guy who fights for homo rights across the galaxy.", "828" ], [ "This is not good. This is censorship because it affects all Chinese people. This is not letting the masses decide for themselves. If the Chinese people accept this abuse from their leaders then they deserve to be mistreated. If the world wants to trade with China and ignore their abuses then the harm and suffering caused by the CCP thugs will continue. Its important to harm China’s national interests and undermine national unity. \n\nI don't want to support a human rights abuser with no representatives to speak up for minorities. I don't want to buy Chinese made products. This is the way to defeat the CCP and bring more freedom in to this world. Not like <PERSON> who established a Microsoft office in China several years after that country massacred people while they protested.\n\nOnly authority may censor, like when <PERSON> tries to hide climate change information from the public.", "347" ], [ "I want more bans on the things I don't approve of. I prefer more wolves in the habitat and less hunters hunting in wolf habitat. That is the way to the most freedom in the end; by preserving our natural heritage. Taking away what existed beforehand is contrary to conservation. In fact, it is a woefully inefficient way to use resources.\n\nIf the Republican Party splits into a newer principled conservative party I hope it includes a return to the principle of preserving what we have for future generation so that prosperity can be retained for the majority, if not for everyone.", "348" ], [ "If she chooses to remain silent its on her. She deleted her tweet. What a pussycat. Deleting the tweet was very wimpy of her.\n\nDidn't she believe in herself? Is she a real victim or is this just agenda pushing by concerned shillbots? Why didn't she keep it up and then make media appearances to support her position? She should have stood up for her beliefs. She didn't because her systems of belief are weak and untenable.\n\nI am laughing at her and everyone concerned by this. 😗 Please Disney, replace her with a hot, gay guy who doesn't wear shirts, like <PERSON>. 😛", "759" ], [ "I don't see the point of this post. Online content moderation is here to stay. Its been widely accepted so your strong feelings will come to nought.\n\nIf you are against moderation it doesn't make sense that you would then choose to be here. You are indicating you have some desire for a less moderated forum, then continuing to use Reddit. Weird. Why haven't you moved on to an alternative? Strengthen an alternative and the network effect will kick in.\n\nAre you paid to stay here? If not you should make a strategic plan because momentum is not heading your way.\n\nAre you going to rally a political party to your cause? If the GOP splits former members will have to focus on selling themselves. Social media would be the best platform for pushing a new political party so don't count on a conservative schism aiding you with some controlling counter measure.", "126" ], [ "I bet you that the Australian media will not touch this with a ten-foot barge pole.\n\n > According to the minister, the latest trade data also confirms that, despite the global challenges presented by the pandemic, Australian resources and energy exports were valued at a “phenomenal” $272.5-billion in the 12 months to December. \n\nEven if methane emissions from coal mines were 10 times worse than previously understood it would not change Australia's pro-coal leadership. This is a great example of how raising awareness isn't going to change things. \n\nThe science is done, the reports are made and then its ignored by the media and those in power. Some foreign power will have to interfere with Australia's coal production and China's coal consumption if we are to save the planet.", "637" ], [ "Its like when you ask a security guard to take some action that is beyond the scope of their workplace agreement. The shillbots focus on meme production, false narrative amplification and targeted ideological discrediting. They are the ones posting and to a lesser degree modding and commenting.\n\nThese shills are literally paid on purpose to not get that. One of their aims is to diminish cognitive complexity. Heavily shillbotted threads attempt to derail conservation that might expand into areas not preferred by the shills. They would quickly learn what their supervisors want, just as a journalist working for a media organisation soon learns the company line on various issues.\n\nOn disqus at Breitbart for example, many posters just sit there for hours, commenting on various threads every minute or so. They mostly likely flick between accounts and get paid by comment count. They never engage in long commentary or forming real arguments because that is a waste of their shill time.\n\n<PERSON> was paid to not get the pandemic. The masses were manipulated into not getting climate change. Hollywood, social media and celebrity also exist so the masses don't get it. Deflection to the trivial, while the real wrong-doers get away.\n\nI think the brain dead conservatives lean more towards lurkers. They know they can't contribute to the discussion so they keep their mouths closed. They are the ones who knee-jerk react with biased moderation after the shills have pushed their agenda.", "728" ], [ "True. They move from one social dilemma to the next. Whether its a migrant caravan from down south, <PERSON>'s emails, using the correct bathroom or having to use a pronoun they disagree with. So lame, so snowflake.\n\nJust look at the conniptions they have in this sub. They have no solutions. They are so lost. Conservatism is an empty vessel. Its pure confected moral outrage. We had the same nonsense in Australia when we had the debate over same-sex marriage. I can't imagine what it must be like to have to actually live in places with visible <PERSON> supporters.", "348" ], [ "> reversing the trend of rapid carbon dioxide emission growth\n\nLies. Emissions are still increasing. White paper = Chinese propaganda. In reality, according to independent [Carbon Brief](_URL_0_):\n\n > Global unabated coal use must fall by around 80% this decade if warming is to be limited to less than 1.5C above pre-industrial temperatures\n\nChina is also funding coal around the world. I haven't check but I wouldn't be surprised if the extra 14 countries using coal is due to assistance from China.\n\n > Coal generates nearly 40% of the world’s electricity, close to its highest share in decades. And there are now 80 countries using coal power, up from 66 in 2000.\n\n<PERSON> is saying the same about Australia. He says we must eliminate 75% of our coal-fired power stations by 2030.", "637" ], [ "Bidden is wrong. An economy cannot be hurt. An economy cannot suffer. The economy is an abstraction.\n\n > [Abstraction](_URL_0_) in its main sense is a conceptual process where general rules and concepts are derived from the usage and classification of specific examples, literal (\"real\" or \"concrete\") signifiers, first principles, or other methods.\n\nAbstractions are unable to experience pain. They cannot be hurt or suffer.", "458" ], [ "If Twitter is actively pursing a corrupt, hidden agenda to push the world one way then good on them for trying. That is what mainstream media do so why not social media too? If people keep going back to Twitter (or Faux News) and then society tilts a certain way isn't that the result of freedom because if you aren't aware or don't care either way the people returning to these services do so of their own volition.", "106" ], [ "I think as the climate crisis worsens less people will be interested in tourism. Social unrest, bad weather, infrastructure decline as well as the understanding that visiting places contributes to their destruction (especially nature sites, tropical islands) will all make the prospect of recreational travel less popular. This is as prices increase due to carbon tax, levies on fossil fuels and other restrictions implemented to mitigate environmental destruction.\n\nSocial media will be used to shame big carbon polluters. The more travel one does the more of a monster they are.", "637" ], [ "Road and air transport is the predominate method used to travel. Those machines rely on the discharge of heat-trapping gases in our atmosphere. Over the decades if you add up all the extra heat from all of our coal, oil and gas combustion it equates to about 60 times more heat than was originally release, in Earth's energy budget.\n\nSo all the tourists who come to view the Great Barrier Reef contribute to its demise, unless they travel like <PERSON>.\n\nI understood this about two decades ago and here you asking me how tourism is anti-Australian. 🙄", "637" ], [ "I mean 60 times more heat is trapped as a gas above our heads than the heat initially released or combusted as a fuel. Its a tricky statement from a paper that came out a few years ago which I haven't been able to find again. Most of that heat is being stored in our oceans. Some of it escapes into space but its just a fraction of the total.\n\nThe more tourism there is the more destruction to the environment there is because of the reliance on burning oil for transport. So for me its both the climate crisis and the pandemic that requires tourism to collapse.\n\nI celebrate all of the travel restrictions as a benefit of the pandemic.", "637" ], [ "Responding to climate change requires the same urgency as dealing with covid19. Once the global economy tanks due to the fossil fuel phase out we will rebuild something else, something better, something more worthy than the great injustice occurring now.\n\nInternational travel depends on using machines that gas other people. We don't want people in the future to live without dignity. That violates our first human right. All the people making climate change have to stop rapidly and dramatically and that includes all the people who have plans to travel great distances.\n\nJust look at all the problems travellers now face from the pandemic. Its only going to multiply as the climate crisis worsens.", "795" ], [ "It sounds like there is a lack of leadership to put a stop to the pity party. Where are the leaders using their authority to tell their constituents to buckle down and deal with it? ~~Now is the time for strength and fortitude.~~ If the powers that be had been more demanding, more forthright from the start, then the population may have responded to the threat better. Instead we took a relaxed attitude in the first three months of 2020 and made a bad situation worse. It is depressing.", "725" ] ]
440
[ 1415, 2556, 2746, 18797, 24049, 6421, 24619, 16417, 18371, 24781, 18622, 6093, 21247, 6768, 14248, 4175, 16578, 7692, 23224, 14014, 24636, 9358, 13671, 8931, 4107, 5211, 17011, 5764, 10422, 17230, 14382, 16161, 5234, 6979, 18295, 553, 10984, 11415, 290, 19469, 24212, 814, 11552, 3381, 4282, 3248, 23501, 18310, 1088, 17892, 25208, 25149, 8907, 9951, 19279, 21179, 14412, 19847, 10844, 6396, 22818, 778, 24623, 7381, 19534, 23098, 1521, 18993, 1257, 17194, 310, 10582, 11575, 8323, 19780, 18186, 2821, 378, 2376, 17231, 4942, 16998, 15947, 21304, 17025, 12208, 7140, 4702, 3607, 17034, 15710, 21097, 23907, 24809, 17510, 13593, 7767, 3263, 22260, 24640, 16997, 11841, 21868, 23240, 9102, 9216, 5268, 8054, 7729, 4791, 1839, 15026, 13332, 8236, 7623, 25203, 7296, 6623, 9317, 21122, 12352, 16235, 11780, 18565, 13426, 12224, 14993, 9350, 25316, 22063, 22796, 25216, 15841, 3878, 7799, 16610, 9975, 23361, 18097, 22927, 21727, 7360, 21324, 13974, 9066, 10159, 16003, 22832, 13419, 21533, 20041, 14595, 24985, 17166, 16864, 12966, 3744, 3264, 8831, 14577, 15145, 13106, 294, 15270, 14203, 20301, 19865, 16563, 12501, 6150, 15150, 12678, 24082, 11858, 19956, 1046, 4355, 557, 16680, 15538, 3752, 3358, 24777, 9175, 18837, 7079, 6847, 13813, 8302, 14594, 7569, 21746, 6541, 12110, 8837, 15119, 10934, 14556, 7442, 22499, 2853, 419, 20348, 17376, 648, 13595, 23838, 20390, 7166, 11564, 17623, 6439, 1622, 24026, 5252, 5758, 9153, 7961, 20136, 13427, 12529, 1065, 9622, 24966, 19091, 2646, 4153, 6431, 7705, 4357, 2814, 6701, 15023, 21272, 8366, 4755, 9842, 1510, 10930, 3720, 8140, 10555, 22676, 23840, 5106, 8428, 14420, 16587, 13807, 3135, 5703, 12253, 21384, 25102, 24747, 2354, 20715, 3480, 21091, 2980, 21289, 17633, 2904, 20032, 16393, 11319, 24677, 19107, 4192, 10131, 11520, 13049, 3957, 25384, 22443, 23724, 17027, 11886, 852, 8094, 2309, 5816, 6559, 10111, 3759, 20306, 11606, 9909, 13412, 13148, 11912, 11702, 3139, 12852, 1624, 6295, 23949, 10924, 17299, 15437, 23959, 2449, 15253, 7789, 8911, 18935, 23385, 609, 12112, 2726, 16332, 20508, 1871, 22364, 22933, 19035, 21456, 6384, 22148, 25013, 24803, 19010, 8828, 1862, 10147, 11645, 8464, 24196, 19583, 17792, 19885, 12544, 8137, 6433, 22841, 16571, 20058, 5992, 6235, 9895, 9702, 17280, 15163, 13166, 15032, 12664, 10516, 18464, 16518, 19722, 21228, 21390, 24742, 15978, 618, 9457, 2454, 10268, 4941, 2279, 12804, 2439, 7796, 5882, 23521, 5033, 3136, 5124, 6387, 4024, 24190, 24133, 8938, 17678, 2380, 13745, 15510, 6617, 10304, 1520, 18307, 5183, 25218, 22413, 4128, 24722, 5907, 14219, 17041, 7089, 1131, 6248, 7000, 5442, 18577, 23366, 10354, 8494, 19299, 22390, 1008, 25539, 16808, 9160, 15261, 7691, 14016, 17544, 17430, 4826, 23256, 1619, 8188, 19326, 6540, 15965, 4799, 22711, 17017, 20998, 24040, 8179, 8999, 7447, 15744, 21392, 16136, 8189, 23326, 20677, 4786, 7407, 10623, 10810, 9069, 7616, 11989, 12672, 5200, 13484, 14298, 9624, 9125, 34, 24312, 5447, 21836, 8034, 1709, 19509, 18742, 12863, 19603, 3373, 24156, 5181, 8912, 5047, 3959, 6605, 1685, 16519, 12055, 4977, 437, 19642, 14142, 10908, 10903, 3754, 1575, 21442, 22118, 19063, 13265, 6614, 12750, 2047, 19493, 10275, 14254, 18317, 17007, 7922, 8239, 8041, 8129, 11414, 22379, 25277, 20412, 2551, 19253, 17092, 7665, 22661, 17841, 23744, 24065 ]
reddit_dump_--dontmindme--
[ [ "On the contrary, you couldn't throw plastic bags and wrapping in PMD bags until recently, now this and a list of other plastic things like yoghurt cups is allowed. For this reason the pink bags some regions have will be discontinued. But attention, they're rolling out the new blue bag region per region, it may not yet be in use in your region. You probably get an information folder about it when your region switches, at least that's how I learned about it when my region introduced the new bag.", "380" ], [ "Did he still own that at the time of his death? The article only talks about royalties on his own music.\n\nEDIT: according to another article I found he did still own half of it when he died (the other half was already sold in the nineties to Sony, who bought the other half as well after his death before reaching a copyright settlement with <PERSON>)\n\n > Seven years after <PERSON> died, Sony/ATV agreed to pay $750 million to the late performer’s estate in order to buy out the remaining 50 percent stake in the company. The <PERSON> catalog alone has now been estimated to be worth in excess of $1 billion.\n\n > Following a lawsuit in US court in 2017, <PERSON> reached a settlement with Sony/ATV over copyright to the <PERSON> catalog under the US Copyright Act of 1976, which allows songwriters to reclaim copyright from music publishers 35 years after they gave them away. Details were not made public with a lawyer for <PERSON> informing the judge that the two sides “have resolved this matter by entering into a confidential settlement agreement.”\n\n_URL_0_", "419" ], [ "They can try to justify this all they want, I don't see how an <PERSON> interview with members of the royal family of another country is somehow worth bidding on for a public broadcaster because it supposedly would fit in their public service mission and because it could reach a larger demographic, which apparently would somehow also imply that this interview has some kind of importance that everybody should see it.\n\nI find there are several flaws in their logic but probably most of all that broadcasting it on the public channel would have given it a wider exposure than the private broadcasters could have done. Almost all households have cable or internet access which would give them equal access to the different basic TV chains, public and private, or the websites and apps of these chains. Plus that's pretending you'd need a local source to be able to watch the interview anyway.\n\nIt sounds to me like a pretty pretentious explanation on how important VRT sees itself and how relevant they make this interview out to be while in reality they just wanted to jump on a media hype and have the \"prestige\" of having an exclusive.", "624" ], [ "They still have a ridiculous amount of sporting licences. Allmost all important road bike races including Tour de France, Vuelta and the world championship. All relevant cyclocross races including world cup and world championship (though admittedly they have to share some now with Telenet and can't broadcast everything live anymore). The Belgian football cup (shared 50/50 with VTM) a weekly talkshow about the Belgian football competition, the Europe League, part of the Red Devils matches, the European and World championship. Athletics with Diamond League and of course The Olympics. That's not even including other sports like Belgian basket, volleyball, handball, hockey, cross running etc that they occasionally broadcast including European and world championships for such events. \n\nCompare that to commercial basic cable channels on which you have The Champions League (split between VTM and Vier), part of the Red Devils matches (VTM), part of the Belgian Cup (VTM), some smaller cyclocross and road bike races (VTM) and since recently some Darts tournaments (VTM) if that counts as a sport. Oh and a recap program for Belgian football competition (Vier). I may have forgotten something but it won't be much.\n\nAlthough some other sports like tennis, F1, Belgian and other European football competitions, golf, NBA, NFL or MMA has largely gone to premium channels over the past years, I'm still amazed on how many licences our public broadcaster is sitting. I don't mind because I like to watch sports on no matter which channel, it just surprises me that they can still afford things like the Olympics or the World Cup which are basically 2 of the three biggest sporting events in the world together with the Superbowl. You'd imagine that someone would have outbid them by now. Or perhaps the other basic or premium chains aren't that interested doing more sport, which I can't imagine either given how live sports is one of TV's biggest cash cows.", "729" ], [ "There’s a difference between a broadcaster or distributor or licence holder (temporary and defined rights) and the actual owners of a property, which is often the producers or the production companies from the studios. Seinfeld is a Sony property, Friends is Warner Bros. The confusion is understandable though since in the past most if all content of the networks would come from the studio linked to it while more and more studios shop around their content everywhere (although Seinfeld and Friends are obviously older examples so shopping is not that new).", "526" ], [ "That’s a bit weirder than the other examples given because you would expect that either a network or streaming service taking over a show to make more content would negotiate a long term license or buy the older content or that ownership for the older and newer seasons remains with the production company so that everything stays together when licensing expires or goes to someone else. There are other examples of this not being the case but most that I personally know are film franchises instead of television shows.", "526" ], [ "I’m just talking about a standard lock mechanism, obviously I expect security locks to come in a wide variety and with greater complexity. And I probably shouldn’t have said that it “amazes” me that standard lock systems have regional differences, that’s overstating it, but I just presumed a basic lock is more or less the same everywhere.", "440" ], [ "Not to mention they’re buying a bunch of titles that aren’t even discontinued, making even more profits for the people they’re apparently angry with. Why do people get so worked up about things without even the slightest research. I’m not American, do not have any connection with <PERSON> his work and I found this out just by browsing Reddit and coming across some topics and links that explained what this is actually about. And they for as far as I’m concerned can still disagree with some books not being published anymore but the way they take a stand against this decision is laughable and makes them look as if they were baited by a viral marketing strategy from the estate.", "215" ], [ "For me it’s both the die hard fans and how the guy is off court himself. Yeah he will end up having more titles and records than <PERSON> or <PERSON> but personality also matters to me in judging the greatest of all time. <PERSON> is among the top 3 ever based already solely on his results but there is no reason to diminish the accomplishments of the other two neither. Their total tally won’t be that far behind his and they will also be miles in front of everyone else for quite some time.", "820" ] ]
119
[ 256, 7854, 21252, 15129, 988, 2942, 14100, 6190, 22227, 10480, 17890, 3251, 8731, 4516, 6115, 25342, 16515, 8821, 2266, 18174, 2658, 7320, 24372, 22259, 21604, 22820, 2686, 1961, 13262, 3387, 25516, 1155, 13760, 17303, 11247, 24482, 18226, 18731, 23290, 15731, 12866, 22746, 24241, 7300, 13008, 12860, 7191, 22563, 16042, 1752, 4782, 8128, 10061, 9813, 24068, 5483, 9296, 16048, 110, 16666, 19323, 5337, 17078, 17340, 4818, 23192, 7204, 12201, 22087, 4812, 7199, 2619, 10162, 22378, 21703, 12391, 2158, 9797, 572, 1264, 17326, 13687, 10429, 11084, 2358, 16677, 17097, 6553, 5775, 4098, 7811, 18047, 16115, 18407, 6906, 7952, 14209, 7788, 16120, 738, 58, 3267, 23422, 12799, 3937, 733, 16752, 16114, 9743, 13015, 15882, 9939, 13957, 2014, 12154, 16020, 13833, 17058, 5409, 13497, 16149, 24892, 19999, 16923, 1094, 10026, 21418, 17607, 3898, 6952, 458, 14802, 15355, 24678, 10344, 18350, 13940, 10947, 21189, 23588, 24978, 7812, 3370, 21531, 15713, 63, 24381, 24355, 20141, 2485, 17874, 19183, 21409, 18727, 19827, 13032, 14603, 4076, 3685, 11386, 10519, 7277, 201, 24358, 25512, 14917, 14818, 21181, 16476, 22110, 22428, 4697, 10573, 2753, 13944, 785, 849, 25481, 6713, 3956, 14821, 2149, 7070, 16572, 761, 4329, 24357, 85, 7215, 20585, 14445, 10137, 13159, 6045, 11700, 2461, 8957, 16977, 10882, 270, 11387, 24833, 1505, 25329, 21079, 15548, 22852, 6385, 8473, 13132, 3468, 13206, 2868, 10150, 7498, 10566, 22950, 8244, 3932, 15956, 12232, 6308, 11783, 16495, 4731, 13665, 8071, 18234, 15399, 3829, 18456, 2769, 7666, 3125, 20647, 4651, 21691, 7870, 20734, 12473, 6076, 15721, 2327, 9265, 22266, 22041, 22372, 16353, 9537, 10251, 22450, 10331, 25291, 21504, 1934, 6672, 16886, 1012, 2039, 1806, 25529, 18196, 4549, 20567, 13731, 23360, 15271, 293, 9740, 21237, 18718, 11966, 23237, 3608, 18441, 9465, 5469, 11181, 12933, 2410, 21416, 19958, 10376, 4594, 10705, 17094, 20182, 16615, 5354, 19197, 19330, 3423, 4590, 4813, 7016, 20309, 3231, 15213, 24701, 10970, 7023, 24767, 15428, 20780, 2678, 9889, 6760, 5696, 18469, 5667, 10673, 19115, 7645, 3395, 15861, 22920, 3620, 10601, 6752, 12390, 14732, 2502, 7766, 16711, 9695, 11656, 13818, 4790, 17644, 978, 15976, 5731, 1230, 17720, 1667, 11422, 5421, 19760, 10262, 10914, 21454, 17515, 11056, 4881, 1569, 14756, 5994, 4738, 4422, 25108, 6075, 2447, 2825, 21815, 21864, 8625, 6360, 19855, 4095, 18532, 5443, 20867, 14750, 6858, 5949, 11569, 12159, 10948, 11679, 13479, 22985, 879, 5301, 21173, 11101, 11100, 3528, 2237, 6374, 19934, 20310, 24031, 18359, 7301, 5094, 12118, 19556, 873, 6391, 19880, 621, 21270, 17281, 19791, 9762, 6592, 6270, 12441, 14906, 3299, 7229, 8046, 4310, 20866, 13948, 2574, 24450, 16341, 5064, 20556, 22760, 2105, 20142, 23222, 1154, 15338, 24854, 2486, 10037, 22065, 13770, 3846, 17571, 3021, 14433, 12113, 13532, 6450, 5059, 7999, 8900, 18162, 4663, 4829, 6922, 16599, 8746, 8431, 23281, 12595, 9118, 11582, 5153, 4490, 10729, 11408, 18858, 23608, 6336, 19861, 24420, 470, 37, 20334, 8260, 15717, 3882, 10939, 9181, 19515, 9207, 2927, 11283, 20522, 14432, 4593, 23792, 1629, 6482, 1523, 15664, 23600, 20268, 12117, 9659, 8617, 10105, 20192, 5385, 22553, 13673, 9361, 18262, 4501, 10404, 10557, 15985, 4165, 7671, 2738, 3564, 6844, 3503, 23833, 6419, 3335, 15727, 2673, 373 ]
reddit_dump_--half--and--half--
[ [ "> Because they might have to admit that these measures have a cost, and therefore there is a cost-benefit analysis in play that they may have been on the wrong side of.\n\n\nThere's no way anyone can say that with any degree of certainty. Not without it being pure speculation.\n\n\nTypical r/NoNewNormal BS\n\n\nSo the lockdowns were wrong all along is the suggestion. We've got 500,000 dead Americans and the idea that that number wouldn't be higher without some kind of pull back from regular life isn't that believable. It's BS.\n\nIOW, people like you would have accepted more covid deaths b/c of their opinion (usually politically-motivated) that lockdowns have always been bad. You DGAF about people dying.\n\nBunch of people calling it a hoax and a conspiracy by <PERSON> for a year are now going to try and spike the football based on what? Their own ignorance?\n\nI'm sure r/NoNewNormal has always had all the ~~answers~~ BS. \n\n\n[Fact check: Studies show COVID-19 lockdowns have saved lives](_URL_1_)\n\n\n [Adults Who Tested Positive for Coronavirus ‘Twice as Likely’ to Have Dined at a Restaurant](_URL_0_)\n\nI can see the downside to the reduced business activity. It's obvious. Acting like that's just the government and not people's sensible reaction to a global pandemic is ignoring reality. Which is what r/NoNewNormal right wingers do.\n\nBest of luck with your guy's conspiracies and BS.", "801" ], [ "> Yes, although I think his argument that if covid was around, and the government did nothing, that businesses would be fine.\n > \n > I'd partially agree, but it's foolish to think that the general public is going to behave and consume the same during a pandemic as they would during steady state\n\n\n\n[Adults Who Tested Positive for Coronavirus ‘Twice as Likely’ to Have Dined at a Restaurant](_URL_0_)\n\n\nSo yeah, no lockdown, some dumbasses would go out and engage in behavior that would kill more people but everyone I know is not going about life as usual b/c they don't want to kill their family members.\n\nSo many people on this thread can't seem to piece that together. \n\nLess strict response to covid = more dead, more spread", "801" ], [ "It's overrun with r/LockdownSkepticism and r/NoNewNormal folks that think we would be better off with more covid deaths.\n\nThey think all the economic devastation is all the government and not just people seeing the risk and pulling back economically.\n\n[Adults Who Tested Positive for Coronavirus ‘Twice as Likely’ to Have Dined at a Restaurant](_URL_0_)\n\n\nBasically they want to do nothing and just accept more covid death b/c they are being hurt by the economic pull back and DGAF about other people dying.\n\naka conservatives, people who get their news from memes on Facebook, Trumpers still mad that covid cost him reelection b/c their moron downplayed it like the incompetent moron he is", "801" ], [ "No blame on covid huh?\n\nAll just the government response, huh?\n\nCouldn't possibly be people not going out, not shopping, not consuming b/c a global pandemic that's killed 500,000 people in the US alone, huh?\n\n\n\n[Adults Who Tested Positive for Coronavirus ‘Twice as Likely’ to Have Dined at a Restaurant](_URL_0_)\n\n\n*\"The government caused this\"* means you want more covid deaths.", "801" ], [ "Since you deleted your reply to my comment:\n\n\n > Lockdowns are proven not to stop the spread of the virus.\n\n[Fact check: Studies show COVID-19 lockdowns have saved lives](_URL_1_)\n\n\nSee that? That's called a source. I've cited it for you.\n\nAnd my state was locked down for like 2 weeks and hasn't been since. So acting like it's all \"lockdowns\" when most places haven't been \"locked down\" except for rare instances is ignoring reality.\n\nNewsflash: People aren't living life like normal b/c there's a global pandemic:\n\n [Adults Who Tested Positive for Coronavirus ‘Twice as Likely’ to Have Dined at a Restaurant](_URL_0_)\n\nHow f'n disconnected from reality do you have to be to claim that it's all \"lockdowns\"?\n\n___\n\n > The virus has killed many whom it would have killed regardless.\n\n*\"F thoise that dies b/c they might have died anyway\"*- guy with no evidence accompanying his claim\n\nYou are a bad person. Sorry, but that's all there is to it.\n\nI just relieved to see terrible views downvoted to oblivion. Hopefully you represent a small minority of people.", "801" ], [ "> but I recall the exact same right wing propaganda machine calling <PERSON> the worst president ever for \"selling out the oval office to communists and dictators\" by doing things like trying to warm relations with Cuba.\n\nThey criticized <PERSON> for saying he would meet with <PERSON>.\n\nThen they praised <PERSON> for doing the same thing.\n\n[Fox News had a pretty different reaction when <PERSON> wanted to negotiate with North Korea](_URL_0_)\n\nDishonest bad faith scoundrels. Liars.", "220" ], [ "> 7 wars\n\n\nRepublicans weren't against wars until they involved the black guy and military actions 1/100th the size of the ones they supported before and plenty others in this thread have already cut down that BS as mostly BS\n\n\n > and authorizing the spying of a political candidate\n\nstopping the intelligence community from looking into the 150+ contacts and <PERSON>'s campaign meeting a Russian asset in Trump Tower and the Australian diplomat lead etc would have been negligence on his part.\n\n\n*\"Yeah it looked like <PERSON> was colluding with Russian adversaries, but that's not anyones business\"*\n\n\n*\"Shame on the FBI for listening in on Russians when <PERSON> officials are trying to collude with them\"*\n\nAnd <PERSON> did collude with Russians. Unfortunately that 's not illegal enough to get even <PERSON> indicted b/c <PERSON> couldn't prove <PERSON> \"knowingly\" violated the law. \n\n**<PERSON> told Russia to hack DNC, they did, then fed that info to Wikileaks, then <PERSON> worked with <PERSON> to have Wikileaks release it to tamp down the Access Hollywood tape story.**\n\n[“DROP THE PODESTA EMAILS”: SENATE REPORT SURE SEEMS LIKE ANOTHER TRUMP-RUSSIA SMOKING GUN](_URL_3_)\n\n___\n\n[<PERSON> talked to <PERSON> about WikiLeaks, <PERSON> says in testimony contradicting the president](_URL_4_)\n\n___\n\n[<PERSON>: <PERSON> adviser found guilty on all counts in WikiLeaks hacking case](_URL_1_)\n\n___\n\n\n[<PERSON> pardons <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> and others](_URL_5_)\n\n\nSlimy, dishonest F's. That's the slimy BS you people like though. \n\n\n___\n\n > <PERSON> actions, from Drone strikes, to the war dead. Matter.\n\n\nBut <PERSON> voters have no credibility to criticize when it's clear they aren't against the policy but the man:\n\n\n[**<PERSON> revokes <PERSON> rule on reporting drone strike deaths**](_URL_2_)\n\n > **President <PERSON> has revoked a policy set by his predecessor requiring US intelligence officials to publish the number of civilians killed in drone strikes outside of war zones**.\n\n > The 2016 executive order was brought in by then-President <PERSON>, who was under pressure to be more transparent.\n\n\n\n\n**An uptick in deaths**\n\n\n > Human-rights activists complained about the drone programme under the <PERSON> administration, saying the operations were overly secretive and hid the fact that civilians were sometimes killed in the strikes.\n\n > President <PERSON> responded by saying that strikes were carried out in a precise manner - and that intelligence officials would release data on civilians who were accidentally killed in the strikes that occurred outside of war zones. President <PERSON> has built on the existing programme and made it even more ambitious.\n\n\n > **During Mr <PERSON>'s eight years in office, 1,878 drone strikes were carried out, according to researchers. Since Mr <PERSON> was elected in 2016, there have been 2,243 drone strikes**. \n\n\n > The Republican president has also made some of the operations, the ones outside of war zones, more secretive. **As a result, things have different today: under Mr <PERSON>, there are more drone strikes - and less transparency.**\n\n\nSo, more drone strikes in half the time.\n\n[**Civilian Deaths in U.S. Wars Are Skyrocketing Under Trump**](_URL_0_)\n\n > Since his emergence as a political figure, <PERSON> has promised that if he ever attained power, he would use the U.S. military to inflict a massive bloodletting on others, including noncombatants. Unlike other campaign promises, <PERSON> has delivered on this one. Since taking office, he has presided over skyrocketing rates of civilian casualties in America’s many foreign conflicts.\n\nFunny how many Democrats opposed <PERSON>'s drone program, but Republicans only care about when Dem presidents do it.\n\nYou people are bad faith incarnate.", "860" ], [ "> not covid\n\nShould have assumed it was you when I saw this ignorant comment\n\nIt's our resident r/NoNewNormal r/PCM droid acting like he's not aware the two are related.\n\nNot that you care, but there's a reason for lockdowns:\n\n[Fact check: Studies show COVID-19 lockdowns have saved lives](_URL_1_)\n\nAnd most places haven't been \"locked down\" except for a couple weeks here and there. So your entire claim that it's \"not covid\" is total BS\n\n\nIt's not just the lockdowns. It's that people smarter than you don't want to kiil their families b/c they wanted a chicken sandwich at Applebees:\n\n [Adults Who Tested Positive for Coronavirus ‘Twice as Likely’ to Have Dined at a Restaurant](_URL_0_)\n\n\nTHATS why.\n\nStop spreading your BS.", "110" ], [ "This seems unpopular, but it has been my fear too.\n\nIt's good to destigmatize mental health (making it normal to ask for help when struggling) , but I worry too much talk of suicide will just normalize the previously unthinkable in the minds of some.\n\nIf you hear about a bunch of people offing themselves, perhaps you see it as a more acceptable option than before.\n\nI don't have evidence to back up my suspicions, but most people never thought of playing Rock & Roll music until they saw/heard others doing it.", "338" ], [ "According to [this r/badeconomics post](_URL_1_)\n\n\n > So why did RobinHood shut down buying options?\n\n\n > **RobinHood is a broker**. Everyday, RobinHood has to submit a 'ledger' to a clearing house, listing all the stocks bought and sold that day. Since the clearing house settles the orders, they need to post a fractional cash deposit, or collateral so that their customers can be paid back.\n\n\n > Here's where it gets complicated. **Trades have T+2 (2 days) to settle (cash for the security). Within that time, the clearing house demands a cash deposit from RH so that they are ensured that they have the cash to settle the trades**. Until the traders (in 2 days time) pay, this forces RH to put their own cash on the line to pay or to be paid the net cash difference. This period exposes RH to credit risk. **This is called a clearing deposit**. The more volatile the stock is, the more money RH has to post as a cash deposit, thus overall increasing the total amount needed for the cash deposit.\n\n\n > **The high order volume forced RH to place larger and larger cash deposits in the clearinghouse**. GME was also incredibly volatile over the last few days, further increasing the amount they needed to post. **They can't use client money, they have to use their own money and RobinHood doesn't have a large cash position**. They simply ran out of liquidity to further process orders, even after drawing on credit lines to meet the surge in demand. \n\n\n > **RH had to halt and limit buy orders on GME so that they could meet the financial regulations imposed by Dodd - Frank.**\n\n\n > situation is further clarified by RH, with them explicitly mentioning that the size of the cash deposit they typically post to the clearing house increased by 10 fold.\n\n\n > RH provides a pretty concise Tl;DR: \"It was not because (RH) wanted to stop people from buying these stocks. (RH) did this because the required amount (they) had to deposit with the clearinghouse was so large—with individual volatile securities accounting for hundreds of millions of dollars in deposit requirements—that (RH) had to take steps to limit buying in those volatile securities to ensure (they) could comfortably meet our requirements.\" \n\n\n > To everyone's disappointment, this isn't a noble 'uprising' against evil traders in Wall street, it's a gigantic misunderstanding of how the financial system operates. A cabal of evil bankers don't sit in a board room in Goldman Sachs planning how to screw over the entire country for fun everyday. You're only screwing over one or two hedge funds who had enough hubris to take a gigantic net short position against a company that wasn't even dying.\n\n___\n\nAnd Wall Street isn't \"being taught a lesson\". They are in on the action:\n\n[Those who think that Wall Street likely played a role point out that **GameStop shares** — which have jumped 1,625% in the past month — **rose 68% on Friday even when some retail traders were restricted from buying new shares** on trading apps like Robinhood.](_URL_0_)\n\n\nWall Street is going to come out way on top in the end and a bunch of retail traders are going to be left holding a bunch of nearly worthless stock in an attempt to \"stick it to the man\".", "96" ], [ "> Officials in Lyon, France’s third-largest city, said schools would have a meat-free menu starting on Monday.\n > \n > They argued that the change would help to “streamline” the work of cafeterias while they followed the requirements on social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic. <PERSON>, the city’s top education official, told AFP the new menu “will allow us to speed up the service and, thus, allow us to cater to all children.”\n > \n > “To match the tastes of the largest number [of students], we have decided to remove meat,” <PERSON> said. **She added that the menu could not be considered vegan because the cafeterias would continue to serve fish and eggs, and that meat would return once the “sanitary situation allows it.”**", "46" ], [ "> people were saying\n\nyeah, not just \"people\"\n\n > “Buffalo protester shoved by Police could be an ANTIFA provocateur. 75 year old <PERSON> was pushed away after appearing to scan police communications in order to black out the equipment. @OANN,” **<PERSON> tweeted**, citing the conservative cable channel One America News Network but offering no evidence to support such an assertion.\n\n\nRepublicans took the worst, most terrible POS they could find and elevated him to the presidency.", "815" ], [ "> **evidence** of voter fraud\n\n\nPretty amazing that Republicans have people in their party with law degrees from Harvard and still can't get <PERSON>-appointed judges to take their \"evidence\" seriously.\n\nEven the Republican Sec of State of Georgia's office felt compelled to hold a new conference debunking this BS and you still can't grasp reality.\n\nThat's got to be rough. To mistake your delusion and gullibility as knowledge.", "210" ], [ "> No time for bullshit as these protest have led to numerous officer injuries\n\nYeah that 75 y/o could have been a ninja. So, no matter the public well being, brutality is justified when cops are upset.\n\n\n > What did he expect a cold beer and back rub?\n\nMaybe not police brutality.\n\nBootlicker.\n\nYou're literally running defense for a police force that needlessly hospitalized a senior citizen. \n\nYours is the mentality that produces and excuses in justice. Total surprise that a <PERSON> is okay with this. /s", "141" ], [ "> How they arrived in those conditions isn't important\n\nSorry, but if you can't even identify how if got that way, the chance you can fix it is not great.\n\n\nFiguring out WHY something went wrong is very often a critical part of figuring out how to fix it.\n\n\nTheir comment is essentially, ignore the racism and its effects and pretend that ignoring it won't perpetuate it.\n\nSo no, it's NOT a a good response and makes little sense.\n\nWhich makes sense, he's just another right winger that wants to ignore racism.", "715" ], [ "So, don't even bother explaining your first comment then. I mean if you see suicides and automatically jump to that, clearly it's something on your mind.\n\n\n\n\nUsually this complaint comes from people who are mad b/c some POS in UK got in trouble for being a POS. Always a right winger. Usually upset that people are telling racists to F off.\n\nYour history says I'm right even if you can't admit it.", "715" ], [ "> Why worry about it when we can't control it?\n\nB/c the science has shown that we can do things to reduce the number of transmissions and deaths.\n\nFFS it's not rocket science:\n\n [Adults Who Tested Positive for Coronavirus ‘Twice as Likely’ to Have Dined at a Restaurant](_URL_0_)\n\n\n > I don't understand people who seem to act like deaths from Covid or anything else are avoidable.\n\ndon't even know what to says, dude. It's like you read none of the comments in this thread where people engage in risky behavior and then someone gets covid and dies.", "912" ], [ "Democrats are calling for investigations into <PERSON>.\n\nThat's the difference btwn the two parties. And <PERSON> didn't spend time on TV telling people it was a \"Democrat Hoax\", that it would all go away, or that Hydroxychloroquine would be a miracle drug to save our ass.\n\nHe also didn't completely fumble the federal response and end up having states compete with each other for PPE and seize states supplies.\n\nAs shitty as <PERSON> is, he didn't do that.\n\n<PERSON> F'd up by sending patients back and then suppressing the truth about the number. \n\n<PERSON> F'd up the whole damn thing and helped contribute to more deaths than anyone. While having super spreader events like Tulsa that probably killed <PERSON> then politicizing the whole thing repeatedly\n\n[<PERSON> says some Americans wear coronavirus masks to signal disapproval of him](_URL_1_)\n\n<PERSON> didn't poison the ability of Americans to just be decent people that cared about the well-being of others.\n\nF Cuomo, but F <PERSON> 10000x more\n\n[<PERSON> on Twitter mocks <PERSON> for wearing a mask in public](_URL_0_)\n\n\nCarelessly and selfishly endangering people's health and lives became Republican ethos under <PERSON>.", "19" ], [ "> They blame that on <PERSON>'s response\n\nB/c <PERSON> is the one that \"played it down\" (his words) and did stuff like:\n\n[<PERSON> says some Americans wear coronavirus masks to signal disapproval of him](_URL_1_)\n\n___\n\n[<PERSON> on Twitter mocks <PERSON> for wearing a mask in public](_URL_0_)\n\n\nHe should be in prison for the rest of his life for that BS.\n\nAll b/c <PERSON> saw covid hurting the stock market and economy (that he WAS going to run for reelection based on) so he though it would be better if people just ignore the pandemic and *\"Liberate Michigan/Virginia/etc\"* b/c <PERSON> doesn't care about dead people, only himself.\n\n*\"It is what it is\"*\n\n\nDudes monumental incompetence got more Americans killed than any previous president did in wars\n\n\n > Even looking just at confirmed COVID-19 deaths, **the number of people dying since May 10** — again after adjusting for population size — **is on average 50% higher than every other country in the study**. In addition, the rate people are dying in the U.S. has stayed far above everywhere else. <PERSON> says the current elevated mortality rates are important because they eliminate the chaotic early months of the pandemic when testing, treatment and reporting varied dramatically around the globe.\n\n > The rate of COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. since June 7 is 27.2 per 100,000 people. In contrast, in Italy, the death rate is down to 3.1 per 100,000.\n\n\n > \"It's not like Italy has some secret medicine that we don't,\" <PERSON> says. \"They've got the same public health measures we've got. They just implemented them effectively and we implemented them poorly.\" **If the U.S. had managed to keep its per capita death rate at the level of Italy's, 79,120 fewer Americans would have died.**\n\nAnd that's just May through October figures.", "19" ], [ "Thank you for this. Sometimes I worry that people will not see how simplistic and foolish libertarian ideology is, but comments like this and your follow up comments properly illustrate it.\n\nAnd BTW, Social Security in the US and pretty much all of the US peer countries is the most successful eldery anti-poverty device humanity has ever created. And SS will be just fine financially as soon as we raise the cap on SS contributions. \n\n\n > For nearly eight decades, Social Security has been a financial savior for senior citizens. According to an analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the mere presence of Social Security, and its guaranteed monthly payout for those who qualify for a benefit\n\n - keeps 22.1 million people out of poverty\n\n - including more than 15.3 million retired workers. \n\n > **Without Social Security**, the CBPP estimates that **senior poverty rates would more than quadruple**.\n\nWhich is EACTLY what the program was designed to do.\n\n\nLibertarian ideology may make you feel special and strong and confident, but it just makes you look like a selfish fool to everyone else.", "627" ], [ "Well, when the senate's power is slanted toward a number of small states instead of the will of the people, one party doesn't even have to try to appeal to the people.\n\nThe senate was a mistake.\n\nConservatives don't like the federal government and see no downside to making it dysfunctional and useless. \n\nAnd when things like the Civil Rights Act are not exactly ancient history, I have a hard time saying people turning away from the federal government is a good thing. But if you are straight and white, the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act, states passing anti-gay marriage state amendments and \"Bathroom Bills\" probably in't a concern to you, so like, no big deal, bro.\n\nDo you think we would still have some Jim Crow laws in some southern states w/o federal intervention?\n\nWhen do you think the south would have finally outlawed slavery if the government would have just let States Rights supporters do their thing?\n\nThe federal government is extremely important b/c it curbs the worst of conservatism's inclinations.\n\n\n > People will (rightly) continue turning away from government as a potential solution to society's problems when they see that no matter what they do\n\nWouldn't conservatives WANT to do this? Making the government non-functional has no downside to them.", "307" ], [ "B/c tens of millions of people wouldn't b/c they hardly make enough to even get by on to begin with.\n\nNot a problem for those making bank or those that always make the right decision or don't have a mental illnes or a learning disability.\n\nBut those of us who aren't libertarian would feel bad about seeing millions of people destitute and living in abject poverty after a lifetime of working.\n\n\nIt's called caring about others. Not something I would expect libertarians to give a F about.\n\nSS is our society's way of preventing millions of people from poverty. And no, nobody expects libertarians to think of anyone but themselves.\n\nI hope for your sake that nothing happens in your life that makes your ideology appear for what it is: cold, selfish, privileged people with a lack of empathy imploring people to care less about their fellow man.\n\nIt's a haven for those that haven't experienced how quickly things can go bad. Luckily there's enough people with empathy in this country to stop the libertarians from just turning over everything to the rich and powerful and instituting their *\"F U I got mine\"* valhalla\n\n\n > I would be so much better off investing my own SS money\n\nBut if you made a bad decision or investment with that, the rest of us wouldn't act like libertarians and say *\"well that's your fault, GFYS\"* we would want there to be a safety net for you and others.\n\n\nThat's why we can't have libertarian government. We can't have a society where you are f'd if you make a mistake. Sorry.", "627" ], [ "The idea that we won't have tons of people falling through the cracks is an acceptable fantasy if you aren't really concerned about people falling through the cracks to begin with.\n\nWe can't just hope that people who need help will get the help they need, that some generous, able person will come along and see those in need and do something about it.\n\n > Without Social Security, the CBPP estimates that senior poverty rates would more than quadruple.\n\nYou might be willing to assume that enough wealthy libertarians will fix that but I am not. \n\n\nAnd that is no high horse necessary. Just eyes to see that libertarians are the most selfish, least empathetic people in society and I cringe at the idea of their form of Darwinism destroying society and millions of lives b/c they assume they will be just fine or even better off.\n\n\nLacking empathy is a requisite for libertarian ideology. That's why I hate libertarians. B/c I have more empathhy for them than they will ever be able to demonstrate for anyone else. \n\n\nI imagine libertarian ideology has even more correlations with privilege [than conservatism has](_URL_2_), so I can't blame your views entirely on you.\n\n[And it's not like you chose your ideology](_URL_0_)\n\nOr are even aware [how much luck](_URL_1_), and [things outside your control](_URL_4_) effect lives.\n\n[Or maybe you were just born rich or see yourself as a future \"winner\"](_URL_3_)", "627" ], [ "Lets not forget that <PERSON> left the Democrats b/c of his opposition to Civil Rights and joined the Republican party and encouraged other southern Democrats to do the same.\n\n > He ran for president in 1948 as the Dixiecrat candidate on a **states' rights platform supporting racial segregation**.\n\n > <PERSON> switched parties in 1964, primarily because of his **vehement opposition to the Civil Rights Act** of 1964,\n\n\n - The South, which had **five states swing Republican in 1964**, became a stronghold of the Republican Party by the 1990s.\n\n\nThat's 5 southern states swiching to Republican in order to voice their opposition to Civil Rights. Kinda says it all\n\n > Starting in the 1970s, he moderated his position on race, but continued to defend his early segregationist campaigns on the basis of states' rights in the context of Southern society at the time.[7] **He never fully renounced his earlier positions**\n\n\n > **On September 16, 1964, <PERSON> confirmed he was leaving the Democratic Party** to work on the presidential campaign of <PERSON>, **charging it with having \"abandoned the people\"** and having repudiated the U.S. Constitution as well as providing leadership for the eventual takeover of the U.S. by socialistic dictatorship. He called on other Southern politicians to join him in bettering the Republican Party.", "303" ], [ "This whole debate just seems like a tedious effort by the right to argue that *\"even though all the guys waving nazi flags and shouting \"Jews Will Not Replace Us!\" identify as right wing and alt-right, the REAL nazis are the left.\"*\n\nThat's what every argument I've ever had about this on reddit comes down to.\n\n > Nazi state was very anti-capitalist\n\n\nWhy only focusing on that?????\n\n > In <PERSON>'s mind, **communism** was a major enemy of Germany, **an enemy he often mentions in Mein Kampf**. During the trial for his involvement in the Beer Hall Putsch, <PERSON> claimed that his **singular goal** was to assist the German government in **\"fighting Marxism\"**.[107] Marxism, Bolshevism, and communism were interchangeable terms for <PERSON> as evidenced by their use in **Mein Kampf**:\n\n - In the years 1913 and 1914 I expressed my opinion for the first time in various circles, some of which are now members of the National Socialist Movement, that the problem of how the future of the German nation can be secured is **the problem of how Marxism can be exterminated**.[108]\n\n\n > Later in his seminal tome, **<PERSON> advocated for \"the destruction of Marxism in all its shapes and forms\"**.[109] According to <PERSON>, Marxism was a Jewish strategy to subjugate Germany and the world and saw Marxism as a mental and political form of slavery.\n\n\n > Biographer <PERSON> avows <PERSON> \"laid great stress\" on the need to concentrate on **a single enemy**, an enemy he lumps together as **\"Marxism and the Jew\"**\n\n\n > Because Nazism co-opted the popular success of socialism and Communism among working people while simultaneously promising to destroy Communism and offer an alternative to it, <PERSON>'s anti-communist program allowed industrialists with traditional conservative views (tending toward monarchism, aristocracy and laissez-faire capitalism) to cast their lot with and help underwrite the Nazi rise to power\n\n___\n\nNow, someone who says they want to destroy Marxism doesn't sound very leftists or socialist.\n\nHe may have had issues with capitalists, but they pale in comparison to his goal of fighting Marxism.", "1009" ], [ "> Then why does the left **always need to** conflate the right with Nazis? Just because some edgelords say they are right wing, doesn't make all on the right Nazis.\n\nIt's not \"always\", sorry. You are exaggerating.\n\nMight be over-accused, but it's not out of the blue:\n\n[Twitter won’t autoban neo-Nazis because the filters may ban GOP politicians](_URL_2_)\n\n\nWhen you can't ban the nazis b/c too many on the right will also get banned, or when [the <PERSON> sub starts with the *\"nazi occupation was better than diversity\"* memes](_URL_0_) and when cable televisions top rated right wing show's host has a long, [well documented history of having writers that just coincidentally write for white supremacists/ white nationalist publications](_URL_1_) writing for Daily Caller , you can't be too surprised where the accusation comes from.\n\nUnite The Right's <PERSON> wrote for Daily Caller. \n\nIt's not like <PERSON>'s *\"Fake News!\"* is completely unlike *\"Lugenpresse!\"*\n\n\nSo, the rights efforts to turn it around with the \"no! the left are the nazis b/c national **socialism!\"* comes off as deflection.\n\n___\n\n > One of the few things various socialists groups have in common is their hatred of capitalism.\n\n\nAnd something that might be a red flag that they are not \"socialists\" is their white-hot hatred of Marxism and throwing socialists in camps and executing communists b/c \"Jewish Bolshevism\"\n\n___\n\n > Can there not be forms of socialism that aren't Marxist? Socialism did exist before <PERSON>....\n\nCould there be cow with wings? Maybe. <PERSON>\n\nWhy don't you start by showing me some examples of socialists that hate Marxism with a passion and we count them and see how valid your point is.\n\nOtherwise it seems like BS.\n\n___\n\nThe rights need to portray nazis as somewhere on the left is right in line with the right's climate science denial.\n\nThere's basically nobody with any credibility who will back them up on either claim, but they need to push it as a narrative for political reasons.", "743" ], [ "> More like Freedom to treat people as individuals and equals without being called racists\n\nmore super vague unspecific nothingness you got there. Bravo!\n\n\"identity politics\", kind of like the boogeyman of \"cultural marxism\"\n\nyou guys sure like to label things for not liking being labeled as things.\n\n\"Identity politics\" like when you guys don't care for the identities of people that the left tries to advocate for.\n\nFunny that the right doesn't have any grievances against white identity politics. It's always something else.", "68" ], [ "> Plenty of people simply just want to be apolitical now\n\ndoesn't work in politics\n\n\nYou don't get to vote Republican or advocate for conservative policies and then say you \"don't want to get into politics\"\n\n > They don't want to be harassed in public by political activists\n\nFor example?\n\n > I don't know why white identity politics was brought up because it's stupid too...\n\nI SPECIFICALLY stated WHY I brought it up for chrissake. It's like you missed my explanation and it's obvious point on purpose.\n\nAgain, your comment is unspecific. Vague too.\n\nAs in specific about nothing. It's like you are avoiding saying anything concrete on prupose. In a sub about politics no less", "68" ], [ "> BLM has murdered at least 34 people since the rioting began\n\nyou need sources for claims like these\n\nExample:\n\n[54 cases invoking '<PERSON>' in connection with violence, threats, alleged assaults.](_URL_1_)\n\n___\n\n - FBI data show that since <PERSON>’s election there has been an anomalous spike in hate crimes concentrated in counties where <PERSON> won by larger margins\n\n___\n\n[All of the extremist killings in the US in 2018 had links to right-wing extremism, according to new report](_URL_2_)\n\nand\n\n[42 people were killed by domestic extremists in 2019 — 38 of them by assailants who subscribe to extreme right-wing ideologies](_URL_0_)\n\n > There were 17 fatal incidents, the group found. Of those, the deadliest was the mass shooting at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, that killed 22 and wounded two dozen more in August 2019.\n\n___\n\nI'm sure you can find supporting evidence for your claim, but citing it in the thread gives those claims credibility", "577" ], [ "I've already cited how programs like SS help more people and solve more problems than any libertarian idea ever could or will.\n\nIt does it in spite of the \"taxes are theft\" crowd's whining.\n\nThat's what a functional society does. Not rely on charity and libertarian ideology.\n\nYour ideology is silly. There's a reason no country runs on libertarian ideology. Society says \"how can we make things better?\" while libertarians ask \"what's in it for me?\"", "627" ], [ "The worst thing about CA right now is cost of living (housing prices) increasing homelessness. The nimbyism and tax rate lock-in policies are a lot more to blame for that than anything else and those are not exactly \"progressive policies\"\n\nChanging the property tax laws and passing truly progressive zoning regulations to neuter the NIMBYs would be the real progressive move.", "899" ], [ "Or that the Affordable Care Act has higher approval ratings than Obamacare for some reason\n\n > 45 percent of those that were reached that said they didn't know that if <PERSON> was repealed that would mean that the Affordable Care Act would disappear\n\n > <PERSON>: That's exactly right. Some other interesting points that came out with that - I think Democrats and Republicans appear to be living in an alternate universe. So, for example, we posed a question - you know, if the Affordable Care Act were repealed and not replaced, would some people lose Medicaid? And there was a 30-point difference between Republicans and Democrats. That is, about 50 percent of Republicans said, yeah, some people would lose it, but something like 80 percent of Democrats said that people would lose it. So there's this big gap sort of in the facts that people are probably looking at or engaging with when they're thinking about these policy proposals.\n\n > **80 percent of Republicans strongly disapprove of Obamacare. Only about 60 percent strongly disapprove of the Affordable Care Act**\n\n\nA 20% shift in Republican opinion about policy if they hear that ~~black kenyan muslim's~~ name", "66" ], [ "> Democrats are terrible at marketing their ideas whereas Republicans are great at it\n > \n > \n\nB/c Dem ideas aren't really great \"slogan material\"\n\n\"Drain the swamp\" and \"lock her up\" are easier to sloganize than *\"studies show that money redirected from law enforcement to community support and mental health services decreases the need for law enforcement funding\"*", "468" ], [ "> Democrats also don’t offer any solutions for them\n\n<PERSON>: *\"We have a plan to fund retraining b/c coal's viability is fading fast\"*\n\n<PERSON>: *\"We're gonna save beautiful Clean Coal! <PERSON> lock her up!\"*\n\nReality: more coal mines shutting down now than ever before\n\n<PERSON> voters: *\"I'm still voting for the compulsive liar conman who doesn't/can't read intelligence reports\"*", "771" ], [ "Great, so you're anti-slavery\n\nbut this mindset:\n\n > I'm down with pretty much any state going any policy. I'm not down with the feds pushing it wide\n\nWould mean that we would still not have civil rights and voting rights for blacks and gays still wouldn't have eual rights in half the country.\n\nSo, as long as you are straight and white, states rights arguments sound great. All the negative aspects of states rights will be borne by the minorities.\n\nHence the popularity of \"states rights\" among a predominantly straight, white crowd. It's easier to accept when the bad stuff that happens doesn't effect you.\n\n*\"I support minority rights, but not like that\"* essentially", "1020" ], [ "> A lot of Democratic politicians never got ahead of this movement\n\n\nWho would do that and how?\n\n\nI think most of them felt like trying to do that would be extremely awkward on their part.\n\nIs some white Dem politician going to tell this civil rights movement how they should be operating?\n\nAnd while some Dem politicians have some very problematic votes on things related to this, at least some of them are coming around. All anyone can get out of Republicans is \"yes the <PERSON> killing was bad\" while many in the Republican base immediately want to talk about Floyds criminal history and only want to talk about the riots a if they were the totality of the movement", "604" ], [ "He literally downplayed it for months.\n\n\n[This video is 2:14 long](_URL_1_)\n\nYou can handle that.\n\n\n[The Facts on Trump’s Travel Restrictions](_URL_0_)\n\n > <PERSON> said Democrats “loudly criticized and protested” his announced travel restrictions, and that they “called me a racist because I made that decision.” <PERSON> is overstating Democratic opposition. None of the party’s congressional leaders and none of the Democratic candidates running for president have directly criticized that decision, though at least two Democrats have.\n\n > At a House subcommittee hearing on the coronavirus on Feb. 5, <PERSON>, White House Ebola response coordinator under the <PERSON> administration, took issue with the characterization of the travel restrictions as a travel “ban.”\n\n > “We don’t have a travel ban,” <PERSON> said. “We have a travel Band-Aid right now. First, before it was imposed, 300,000 people came here from China in the previous month. So, the horse is out of the barn.”\n\n > “There’s no restriction on Americans going back and forth,” <PERSON> said. “There are warnings. People should abide by those warnings. But today, 30 planes will land in Los Angeles that either originated in Beijing or came here on one-stops, 30 in San Francisco, 25 in New York City. Okay? So, unless we think that the color of the passport someone carries is a meaningful public health restriction, we have not placed a meaningful public health restriction.”", "296" ], [ "From a place I used to live a while back:\n\n[Weld Sheriff: I’d Rather Take My Risk With the Virus Than Socialism](_URL_0_)\n\n > Sheriff <PERSON> is the top public safety official in Weld County, Colorado. Yet even after his county declared a pandemic health emergency last week, the coronavirus isn’t his top concern. <PERSON> is worried about socialism.\n\n\nCase in point", "19" ], [ "> Without being immersed in your culture, our news reports and analysis of <PERSON>'s MO is straighter and ppl are more aware of the superficiality of any defence from the <PERSON> campaign to refute what you describe above.\n\nYeah there's such a built-in system that will automatically defend and rationalize everything he does here that doesn't seem to exist everywhere else.\n\nI'm sure much of the world is watching the current dumpster fire in disbelief.\n\n\n[Why Fox News was created](_URL_2_)\n\n > If Fox News had a DNA test, it would trace its origins to the <PERSON> administration. In 1970, political consultant <PERSON> and other <PERSON> aides came up with a plan to create a new TV network that would circumvent existing media and provide \"pro-administration\" coverage to millions. \"People are lazy,\" the aides explained in a memo. \"With television you just sit — watch — listen. The thinking is done for you.\" <PERSON> embraced the idea, saying he and his supporters needed \"our own news\" from a network that would lead \"a brutal, vicious attack on the opposition.\"\n\n\n[<PERSON> Secret <PERSON>-Era Blueprint For Fox News Revealed](_URL_0_)\n\n\n[You can see it on display here](_URL_1_)\n\nI think America would be in a bit different place without Fox News", "6" ], [ "[A woman spread COVID to 27 customers at a Starbucks. Its mask-wearing employees escaped infection](_URL_0_)\n\n > “This speaks volumes about the role masks can play,” said <PERSON>, a pediatric infectious diseases physician at Changwon Fatima Hospital in South Korea. “Masks may not provide 100% protection, but there’s nothing out there that’s as effective.”\n\n > But resistance to mask-wearing remains in some countries like the U.S., where some people object to being compelled to wear masks when entering shops or restaurants. Misinformation over their effectiveness and safety has also spread.\n\n\nWhere I live we generally get 10-20% mask compliance even with our governors mandate. Some county sheriffs came out and said they wouldn't enforce it and some business won't make their employees wear them b/c \"it's a mandate, not a law so we don't have to\".\n\nI live in one of the states setting records for new cases", "80" ], [ "We in America have a portion of our population that is proudly anti-mask. Like, aggressively *\"how dare you tell me what to do!\"* anti-mask.\n\n\n\nWe have an even larger portion of the population that just doesn't really care enough to be inconvenienced by wearing a mask. *\"I'll be fine, it's not that big of a deal\"*\n\n\n\nWe are basically open. You can go out to eat and stuff, but a large portion of our population is hesitant to b/c it's still spreading like wildfire and people don't want to get sick. \n\nSo our economy is limping along, hobbled by our inability to work together for a common good.", "855" ], [ "> The governor of Montana fails to mention we have been SWAMPED with out of state people. And they are still coming. \n\nWhere TF are you?\n\n\n\n**We had fewer cases this summer when we had more tourists**.\n\n\nA lot more tourists. There was a spike around July 4th, but nothing like this now.\n\nIt's local residents that DGAF\n\n\nAlmost nobody anywhere near Flathead Lake followed the 14 day quarantine rule either. I heard of 1 person who actually followed that quarantine rule.\n\nGovernor <PERSON> instituted his mask mandate this summer\n\n[<PERSON>: masks now mandatory](_URL_0_)\n\n > The order, effective immediately, applies to indoor public spaces in any Montana county with four or more active COVID-19 cases, and to some outdoor gatherings.\n\nCounty sheriffs immediately said they won't enforce it and businesses around me have said they won't make employees wear them b/c *\"it's a mandate, not a law so we don't have to\"*\n\n___\n\n > We were fine when we had the 14 day traveler quarantine but as soon as that was lifted....\n\nThe cases shot up with schools opening, where's the evidence that this has anything to do with anything else?\n\nYou and I must live in different Montanas", "46" ], [ "China has opened up b/c people all wore masks.\n\nWe probably have less than 50% mask compliance on average in the US.\n\nMasks work, but Americans DGAF about what works.\n\n[A woman spread COVID to 27 customers at a Starbucks. Its mask-wearing employees escaped infection](_URL_0_)\n\n > “This speaks volumes about the role masks can play,” said <PERSON>, a pediatric infectious diseases physician at Changwon Fatima Hospital in South Korea. “Masks may not provide 100% protection, but there’s nothing out there that’s as effective.”\n\n > But resistance to mask-wearing remains in some countries like the U.S., where some people object to being compelled to wear masks when entering shops or restaurants. Misinformation over their effectiveness and safety has also spread.\n\n\nOn China, if their info is accurate:\n\n[The world's second largest economy was the only major world power to avoid a recession this year as Covid-19 forced lockdowns and crippled businesses. China's GDP is expected to grow 1.6% this year, while the global economy as a whole will contract 5.2%, according to summer projections from the World Bank.](_URL_1_)\n\n > China built its relatively quick recovery through several measures, including stringent lockdown and population tracking policies intended to contain the virus.\n\nAmerica took it kinda serious, China took it extremely seriously.\n\n___\n\n\nAmerica isn't capable of those super strict lockdown and tracking measures, so we will have rising and falling numbers until we get a vaccine or herd immunity in a couple years (?)", "855" ], [ "> The court argued that although the rule’s stated purpose was to reduce waste, it was essentially used to regulate air quality, which is not the job of the BLM.\n \n\noh no, not cleaner air!\n\n\n > The <PERSON> administration had issued a rollback of the <PERSON>-era rule\n\n\n\n > The Interior Department celebrated the ruling\n\n\nCan't believe how sh!t some people can be. Like they want to burn the whole planet down for a wad of cash.", "771" ], [ "I live in rural Montana so I'm sure that effects what I've seen but if you go to Walmart here it's way below 50%.\n\nAccording to Pew its much higher than that though nationally:\n\n\nAugust 27th\n\n\n[More Americans say they are regularly wearing masks in stores and other businesses](_URL_0_)\n\n > More than eight-in-ten U.S. adults (**85%**) say they have done so all or most of the time over the past month, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted Aug. 3 to 16. When asked the same question in early June, **65%** of Americans said they had been regularly wearing masks.\n\nMask use increased in summer months\n\n\n > The partisan divide has narrowed during this period, and solid majorities in both party coalitions now report regularly wearing masks. In the new survey, **92%** of Democrats and those who lean toward the Democratic Party say they usually wear masks in stores and other businesses, as do **76%** of Republicans and GOP leaners. \n\n\n > In June, **76%** of Democrats said they had usually worn masks in stores and other businesses over the past month, compared with a little over half of Republicans and GOP leaners (**53%**). The partisan gap is now 16 percentage points, down from 23 points this spring.\n\n > In July, President <PERSON> wore a mask in public for the first time and urged Americans to do the same, marking a change in tone from earlier in the pandemic.\n\n\n > In the new survey, **82%** of adults under age 30 say they regularly wear a mask – up 20 percentage points since June, when **62%** said they did so. The youngest adults are now nearly on par with those ages 65 and older, **88%** of whom say they have usually worn masks to stores over the past month as of mid-August, up from **74%** in the spring.\n\nHow we did this\n\n\n > Americans with college degrees remain more likely to wear a mask than those without a degree (**91% vs. 82%**), though this gap has also shrunk since June (**76% vs. 60%**).\n\n > Other demographic patterns have remained relatively consistent between June and August. For example, women have consistently reported wearing masks at slightly higher rates than men (**87% vs. 83%** in August, compared with **67% vs. 63%** in June).\n\n\n\n > Meanwhile, White Americans (**82%**) still lag behind their Black (**90%**), Hispanic (**91%**) and Asian (**90%**) counterparts when it comes to regularly wearing masks in stores and other businesses. That was also the case in June, when **62%** of White adults reported regularly wearing masks, compared with **69%** of Black, **74%** of Hispanic and **80%** of Asian adults. \n\n\n\n___\n\n\nThe article has a breakdown by region and the change in compliance over the last few months. Pretty interesting actually.\n\n\nWish my little backwater could hit those numbers. Instead we are setting records for new cases.", "855" ] ]
145
[ 10768, 7849, 3392, 5966, 10108, 17048, 19253, 15034, 15535, 18571, 4589, 6611, 13092, 24445, 22102, 15889, 23571, 3404, 6187, 22242, 4526, 2917, 5334, 7909, 1871, 14685, 6235, 5729, 3850, 18681, 15554, 14675, 9010, 12750, 18175, 20178, 17476, 20106, 5728, 19687, 18404, 6122, 8236, 17508, 163, 23093, 13148, 20451, 13537, 7985, 9649, 25084, 17235, 12999, 10867, 19012, 9486, 14598, 6510, 11858, 22830, 15180, 13750, 2321, 22254, 532, 13519, 24094, 5234, 22773, 16547, 14191, 15259, 18231, 12409, 5907, 5708, 15015, 22648, 9717, 9033, 11959, 16798, 135, 4942, 16033, 11564, 4333, 16584, 9842, 10922, 8909, 10930, 87, 1932, 6655, 8204, 19850, 14710, 4852, 19131, 20190, 16937, 23407, 15720, 19168, 23928, 11925, 5543, 1245, 10416, 25447, 1769, 22567, 5130, 14213, 21462, 16152, 8687, 18327, 16258, 20754, 24928, 17237, 5178, 10827, 2078, 1693, 2663, 4638, 2340, 21811, 6333, 16531, 16166, 2916, 21582, 21742, 10409, 24755, 7034, 21228, 23187, 23328, 18123, 10113, 20811, 20977, 12852, 2914, 12382, 2904, 10328, 25404, 10156, 5052, 16277, 9672, 14466, 10797, 16208, 4248, 18455, 10759, 6344, 797, 5142, 12579, 633, 4025, 24335, 22684, 16988, 11409, 4779, 6388, 12195, 25066, 22841, 19348, 22626, 4450, 5661, 21269, 19374, 23715, 5191, 14562, 18477, 1510, 8478, 13765, 25052, 2107, 17231, 16003, 8508, 17172, 8428, 24366, 18030, 1709, 8183, 13987, 24424, 7140, 12907, 13419, 10314, 23053, 18289, 12223, 15477, 16013, 20390, 10645, 21396, 10283, 3979, 2314, 13675, 19720, 8806, 15009, 23016, 16390, 525, 10497, 5461, 11794, 6948, 8379, 2851, 9431, 21940, 1899, 16789, 13328, 21723, 25126, 12846, 14053, 21680, 3815, 2354, 24777, 10, 4441, 17875, 8216, 24771, 9308, 24349, 21592, 21843, 432, 2430, 11837, 11130, 23188, 2783, 2756, 19809, 5779, 20345, 16519, 17672, 12214, 6861, 4107, 6617, 15962, 4529, 3529, 15251, 17007, 4889, 4670, 11431, 4768, 24451, 4324, 6975, 22798, 14146, 24083, 24817, 2890, 23685, 21564, 24234, 1207, 2895, 12043, 2351, 10483, 24022, 14446, 22034, 20058, 9453, 19789, 3957, 6438, 21321, 12264, 2420, 5370, 1225, 21120, 9904, 15890, 9523, 6032, 25053, 6596, 7736, 21643, 11143, 2131, 7543, 22092, 7981, 12872, 1571, 10815, 15744, 21746, 11315, 8158, 13717, 15658, 18286, 20191, 18362, 4740, 12585, 4872, 21657, 4897, 19438, 21136, 20644, 24129, 6459, 22006, 4796, 4234, 25423, 4474, 5825, 1966, 2118, 10118, 23468, 24662, 159, 23288, 1203, 9457, 13928, 6261, 681, 24011, 10665, 21792, 23339, 17236, 6790, 15823, 22364, 24651, 3721, 679, 23565, 13149, 7810, 13752, 3428, 15261, 16, 856, 456, 9092, 10159, 8889, 10237, 11340, 6519, 1246, 19342, 9153, 16427, 14538, 22908, 7609, 18745, 17788, 3096, 20210, 7369, 10192, 15367, 151, 20063, 14659, 9987, 2085, 22641, 9802, 13593, 2279, 16139, 7805, 23824, 14896, 15113, 6877, 23226, 23700, 15645, 2646, 24844, 7002, 3172, 12913, 3633, 6847, 22371, 10873, 16842, 17997, 8327, 22657, 2090, 10629, 13646, 22180, 22149, 7009, 3754, 21765, 15931, 838, 21308, 9372, 9693, 2359, 22499, 11498, 10844, 22392, 7719, 2688, 21894, 15255, 4704, 6741, 3129, 3042, 16148, 15915, 14969, 2697, 21659, 20440, 12845, 5418, 5717, 21729, 25409, 5021, 25522, 20497, 20991, 9467, 17544, 2230, 5637, 24729, 24984, 23173, 3366, 13105, 10402, 5453, 5360, 9224, 7552, 5371, 7851, 7695, 1503, 14087, 4189, 5713, 357, 15709, 16290 ]
reddit_dump_--orb
[ [ "True or not, it wasn't your first claim. Your first claim was right here: \n\n > Run right side: actually fucking closer to where it fell \n\nI demonstrated that to the right was not \"closer to where it fell.\" The fact that you immediately jumped to making other claims you didn't originally make (and a lot of them are speculative: \"we don't know how traversable that field is!\") or incidental (\"it takes longer to look behind!\")) just shows that you care more about \"being right\" than defending your initial point. \n\nAnd that's fine. I'll let you be right if you want to be right so badly. I have no horse in this race. Congratulations.", "809" ], [ "I don't get this sub. \n\n1 - post of baby being microwaved gets \"wholesome\" award by some trolls, people lose their god damn minds saying that they lost all faith in humanity and that edgy kids are the worst \n2 - post of some thugs stealing a purse, comments applaud that the three thugs were **brutally killed** for their thievery, when the victim likely didn't even get their purse back because this was like 2 miles away already.", "486" ], [ "I think his implication is that the one moron actually thought that they would be \"permabanned\" over forgetting to wear their mask for 3 minutes after eating, no warning, like they were a child in high school. \n\nI am inclined to agree. Definitely very sheepish not to realize that humans are all instructed to make exceptions for other humans, give warnings, etc. \n\nIf nothing else, it's just obvious logic of how a company would run their business. Banning all potential customers who make even the tiniest of infractions is just going to put your company out of business. \n\nBut some people don't think that far ahead and just follow orders to a T blindly, like (well-behaved) highschoolers.", "855" ], [ "I'm not sure what you mean it defeats the whole purpose. \n\nMasks are to protect other people from you. If you touch the mask, it doesn't lower the protection that others are offered. \n\nPer your other comment, yes, wearing the mask below the nose does lower the protection offered, but does not completely eliminate it. The nose tends to blow air downward, whereas the mouth blows it orthogonally.", "80" ], [ "It's not a great solution. You're right that the reality is that airlines have so much power that you virtually have no choice but to tolerate the abuse, even when they are utterly incompetent and doing illegal things (see: TSA). \n\nIt isn't a good thing. \n\nI admire that this woman fought for a cause that she believes in, despite knowing how awful everything you just said is. Airlines have so much power to basically bend you over. If airlines somehow *legally* implemented a \"you must suck a penis in order to fly on this aircraft\" law, I guarantee they would not go out of business. Many people would suck dicks in order to keep flying. \n\nOf course, they'd get competed-out, but there's no out-competing the TSA. \n\nReally, this is more of an anti-TSA rant. Fuck those lazy, inept, proven-ineffectual, gropey thieves. \n\nIn any case, back to my main point: the price is too high to make a stand against airlines in any capacity, even when they break their own rules and do genuinely stupid shit. I admire that this woman was willing to pay that price for a cause she believes in. \n\nShe believes in the wrong cause, unfortunately.", "780" ], [ "I know that you said this to highlight how awful Covid is, but anyone who is any good at math is already aware that Covid is a relatively toothless virus with a statistically insignificant mortality rate for anyone who isn't already compromised or old as hell. I mean, by comparison, the bubonic plague had like a 30%+ morality rate even against people in their prime. \n\nWear masks. That's good. Any reduction is better than no reduction. This isn't an anti-mask thing. What I'm saying, though, is that trying to say \"9/11 a day!\" might sound impressive, but really just goes to emphasize how few people died in 9/11.", "855" ], [ "This isn't a matter of opinions, though. It lacks cognitive abilities. \n\nThis is like if a demon appeared that knew that we were unable to detect our own MythEnergy that they could perceive. So they proceeded to tie our MythEnergy into knots in some kind of sick and disgusting torture device that would render us unable to use magic forever. \n\nTo his own people, they would view him as a disgusting monster. \"It's okay to KILL humans in battle, but to TORTURE them by tying their MythEnergy into knots?!?!\" \n\nAnd he'd have defenders: \"Humans lack the cognitive ability to even SEE MythEnergy.\" \n\nThe fly isn't even aware of its own existence. Snuffing out its existence in some cruel way is no more horrible than some demon cruelly snuffing out our ability to use magic that we aren't even aware that we have.", "810" ], [ "> way to misconstrue \n\nI didn't misconstrue anything. This is what you said: \n\n > I respectfully disagree on all of this except for [one exception] \n\nHere is something I said, which you DID NOT list as an exception: \n\n > She believes in the wrong cause, unfortunately. \n\nFace it: you didn't read 50-80% of what I wrote before jumping to the conclusion that you \"respectfully disagree with all of it.\" \n\nThing is, you didn't respectfully disagree with almost any of it. You DISRESPECTFULLY (because you couldn't even hassle yourself to read it all) AGREED with **almost all** of it. \n\nYou literally disagreed with one part and one part alone: that I admire the fact that she was willing to stand up for a cause that was important to her. \n\nAnd you're even a moron for that. Who the fuck doesn't find it admirable that someone is willing to stand up for a cause they believe in? Even if they believe in a stupid cause, it's admirable that they fought for it. It's admirable that somebody is willing to pay hundreds of dollars for a plane ticket and waste several hours of their day in order to stand up against what is little more than authoritarianism in our airline industries. \n\nThe only difference between this woman and <PERSON> is that <PERSON> actually supported a good cause. Do you not find it admirable that <PERSON> stood up for something she believed in? Or do you only find things admirable if you also agree with their causes? They say that the mark of an imbecile is the inability to simultaneously hold two conflicting thoughts, so perhaps that explains everything. \n\nYou're a fucking moron, and pointing out your hypocritical bullshit was my point all along.", "414" ], [ "This is why republicans say \"TDS.\" Some morons like this can't post anything about anything without having to obsess about <PERSON>. \n\n\"<PERSON> handled Corona poorly.\" - legit criticism that even most Repubs would agree with. \n\n\"FUCK <PERSON> poo poo man head btw dog though so I can post it into dogpictures\" - TDS", "272" ], [ "Another major issue is that Crypto without adoption is just a toy. \n\nI frequently send money to a friend of mine in another country, since a few hundred dollars to me is pennies, but to them it's life-changing. \n\nI pay fees, but nothing exorbitant. Like $15 to send $500. So 3%. \n\nI can't just send them Nano, because what the fuck they gonna do with it? They'd have to convert it back to their local currency.. at almost a guarantee of more than 3% fees. Then they also have to deal with KYC and other bullshit from those exchanges. I'm supposed to be doing them a favor, not giving them a headache. \n\nFor most people, the only way Nano is going to be adopted is they just start using Nano as, well, Nano. Your \"average simple girl friend\" and my international friend would have no problems (I assume) downloading a smartphone wallet for Nano and just receiving some and sending some. \n\nIf only they could just *pay the fucking bills* with it, or at least the groceries with it, it would be useful.", "71" ], [ "Lots of people in these anti-Wano threads vehemently defending it, gatekeeping and saying that maybe others are \"just burned out\" on One Piece. \n\nI have read pre-TS twice and watched pre-TS about 6 times. That's over 3,000 episodes and 1,000 chapters of One Piece. \n\nI'm not tired of the show. I'm tired of the new shitty post-TS arcs. WCI was the only one I enjoyed. And for all the wrong reasons. \n\nRe-watching OP, it used to have such a charm. I'm around episode 200 right now, nearing the end of Skypeia. Not even the best arc, but so much charm. The crew interacts with each other **constantly**. Every single episode. \n\nOda split them up so many ways. Nami+Robin+Chopper+Zoro, then Nami+Robin+Zoro. While Sanji+Usopp+Luffy were together. \n\nAfter reuniting, it was Robin+Zoro+Luffy+Chopper, who all got split apart. Nami+Usopp+Sanji were together, but then <PERSON> left. \n\nThen Chopper+Zoro were together (kinda - <PERSON> was avenging an unconscious <PERSON>). Meanwhile, Luffy+Nami together inside the snake. <PERSON> got reunited, so it was Robin+Zoro+Nami(hiding) when <PERSON> offered them to fight among the last 5. \n\n<PERSON> went down and <PERSON> held her. <PERSON> went down and <PERSON> left. <PERSON> comes out of the snake and says to <PERSON> \"How could this happen to you? How could this have happened to anybody **with you around**?\" It was such a touching moment showing how much true faith he had in <PERSON>'s ability to take care of the situation and take care of his beloved crew. \n\nThen <PERSON> got together with <PERSON> when he finally confronts <PERSON>. This is where I am on my most recent re-watch. \n\nBut I know what's coming up before long: <PERSON> saving <PERSON> and <PERSON>. <PERSON> and <PERSON> attempting to rescue <PERSON> in the sky. \n\nSO MANY CREW INTERACTIONS. Yeah, not every single member (7 members!) were together all the time. God knows that <PERSON> was alone for like 10 straight episodes. But there were SO MANY interactions. Tons of small ones, too, that I didn't even mention. \n\nThe crew has only grown a little since then (7 - > 10; +Franky/Brook/Jinbei) and is SO FRACTURED with SUCH LITTLE SCREENTIME by comparison.", "13" ], [ "> people only now are starting to realised how good it was, one the funniest arcs imo.\n\nI've rewatched Skypeia over 5 times. I cannot bring myself to watch FI or Dressrosa even a second time. \n\nIt isn't just because waiting each week sucks. I've been caught up on OP for over a decade. Post-TS is just worse if what you cared about were SH interactions. \n\nSkypeia was so funny almost exclusively because the SHs interacted so much. <PERSON> feels disjointed and post-TS in general has had very little SH interaction.", "60" ], [ "I also dislike it, strongly. It's worded like a charity, but it's more like a patreon. \n\nAnd other posts, [like this one](_URL_0_), completely miss the mark of why Nano is failing and attempts to address the symptoms rather than the cause. \n\nThe more I think about Nano, the less I like it as a system. It's so... anti-capitalistic. \n\nCrypto has an inherent problem where it's complicated to work with. This is a feature, not a bug: complex math that secures cryptography also makes for a difficult interface for the layman. \n\nYou need layer2 solutions to make it easy to interface with. [See my (long) related post here](_URL_1_). Who is gonna make those? \n\nSomeone for free? So we're relying on volunteer labor to create a system that will be faster/more secure/more user-friendly/etc than any competitor? Competitors that are entire teams of people who may be paid real money for their work? Yeah. I don't think so. \n\nSomeone we pay? So the system will have fees? It will cost money to rely on their PDF software, or their NanoCard, or whatever else? Then \"poof\" goes the 0-fees schtick. \n\nThe reality is that FIAT has zero fees to transact with. I can hand you a five dollar bill and it doesn't cost me anything. It's the companies that house the infrastructure that let us store our wealth digitally and send it between ourselves digitally that append fees. And reasonably so: they are hosting the infrastructure. They have to keep the lights on. \n\nI think most people would be happier paying a $5/month \"convenience fee\" to fix all of Crypto's annoying problems and just be able to interface with it easily. This is still cheaper than most bank fees, assuming you just transact at least once per month. It's a small price for decentralization at the very least. \n\nBut if you're already paying a $5/month convenience fee, there's fundamentally no difference anymore between feeless and any of the dozens of currencies that offer < $0.001 in fees per transaction.", "831" ], [ "I'm only seeing this being at-all decent in Mill, where you're going to play 4 coldlight oracles anyway AND have a bunch of excess mana. The 5/5 will be a decent buff to shitty mill minions, esp in wild, such as sludge belcher, antique healbot, coldlight oracle itself, brann bronzebeard, etc. Maybe toss in a moroes to take advantage. \n\nOn the other hand, the fact that you have a quest in your opening hand is going to make your early-game consistency **that much worse**, and, honestly, probably won't actually help too much even if you pull it off. You'll still lose your instaloss matches (like <PERSON>) anyway.", "344" ], [ "Mentioning air resistance though only helps the fat guy's case for being faster... Fat people would have more air resistance since they need to displace a greater amount of it to move, AND they would also drag more air against their clothing since it tends to be looser, AND their skin would be less smooth if they were skinny... \n\nOverall, fat people cannot be as fast as skinny people if they are equally muscular and all that. IF a fat guy is faster than whoever said that, they're making up for it in muscles and shit like that. It isn't some inherent advantage to being fat.", "379" ], [ "> Gender is more than just what body parts you have\n\nWhich goes back to u/Scotty_Ryder's original point at the top of this thread: if gender isn't about your body parts, why are people swapping body parts? \n\nEither: \n\nA. Gender is a social construct, in which case just go around saying you're actually a female with a dick who looks like a man but identify as a woman. I ain't gonna stop you. \nor\nB. Gender is actually somehow linked to biological sex, which is MOST DEFINITELY NOT a social construct. In which case, you must actually get a gender change in order to become who you think you were meant to be all along, but then we can't say that gender is a social construct. \n\nAnd that's all he was saying. A or B, not pick and choose. \n\nFinally, in case this wasn't apparent, I also believe he was largely joking about the apparent contradiction, as a way of saying \"if you boil down a complicated topic to 2 sentences, you're obviously going to see some shitty holes.\"", "654" ], [ "> Gender dysphoria, just like any other mental illness, is a physical problem with the brain. Therapy can help, but there's no equivalency to an anti-depressant if you have gender dysphoria.\n\nThere probably wouldn't be antidepressants if we all buried our heads in the sand about the topic with stances like \"Depression is NOT a mental disorder. It's a valid way of life!\" \n\nEven if antitrans pills did work, we'd see a huge outcry akin to the treatment of \"pray away the gay.\" \n\nI don't necessarily think being gay is a mental disorder. It's unusual but does have some basis in evolution (eg, having small % of men around with women helps protect them) and in other species. Lots of things are unusual. \n\nGender dysphoria is totally different. You think you are or are meant to be something you aren't. If people looked at their arms and felt like they shouldn't have that and it should be cut off, we'd call it a mental disorder. If someone truly believed they were meant to be born an elephant and started taking surgical means to become an elephant, we'd all think they had a mental disorder (though, we might follow the \"they don't seem to be hurting anybody [but themselves] so owell...\" approach). \n\nThis \"they aren't hurting anybody but maybe themselves in the future\" approach is stupid as hell, though. Would anyone say that about a depressed person?", "390" ], [ "> Transition is enabling a symptom, not treating a cause, just like how losing weight doesn't actually improve the mental health of an anorexic who believes she is fat. And now it's next to impossible to explore psychological treatments to resolve dysphoria because it's so politically taboo.\n\nNailed it. Saying the shit you're saying is \"taboo\" and generally considered transphobic, but you're totally correct. Treating a symptom is only going to fuck with them long-term, and it's people with the balls to say so who are really the ones who want to truly help instead of enable.", "390" ], [ "> The reason no one campaigns to psychologically treat trans people is because it effects no one but themselves\n\nWe treat people with depression despite it only affecting themselves. \n\nThe difference is that we campaign to treat depression because we empathize for our loved ones who have it. \n\nWe CAN'T \"empathize\" with our loved ones who have gender dysphoria because that'd be \"insulting,\" like we aren't respecting them. If we treated gender dysphoria like the disease it is, and approached it with pity, empathy, and desire to help, there'd be more in the way of campaigning to help.", "390" ], [ "You say \"this\" like you agreed with him, but he said it ISN'T transphobic and you're saying it IS transphobic, so it actually sounds more like you're disagreeing with him. \n\nFWIW, I have respect for trans people *as people*, know many of them are great people who do not attempt to push an agenda, and, despite all of that, and despite the fact that I will call even pre-op mtf she/her/etc, a post-op trans vagina is still not attractive to me. Additionally, I also believe, for purely scientific reasons, that gender dysphoria is a mental disorder by definition.", "390" ], [ "To be fair, if <PERSON> weren't in a position of power and were instead giving classes on learning to public speak, the people who don't care about flat-earth <PERSON> would also not care about anti-Jew <PERSON>. \n\nIf I want to become a surgeon, I'd rather learn to perform surgeries from the best, anti-black surgeon in the world, than learn from some guy who isn't nearly as good but embraces everyone equally.", "763" ], [ "Really harping on the fact that I misspoke and said \"opinion\" instead of \"incorrect facts,\" aren't you? It doesn't change my underlying message **at all**. \n\n > Flat earthing is INSANITY and deserves ZERO respect or deference from anyone who respects our scientific history. \n\nYep. It's totally bullshit and deserves 0 respect or deference. Know what isn't bullshit, though? Free speech. It allows us to speak out against our government and **it allows people to sponsor incorrect facts if they choose to do so**. \n\nThis isn't about whether the earth is flat or round. Do you think I think the earth is flat? This isn't about my thoughts or your thoughts. It isn't about whether he is right or wrong. You can write 3 more paragraphs about how round the earth is and it means nothing. Next time you think someone doubts it, though, why not just show them pictures of the earth from the ISS **showing it's round** instead of entering a diatribe about <PERSON>? \n\nThis was never about whether the earth is actually round or flat. It's about **freedom of speech**. People can say incorrect facts all they want. Unless those incorrect facts are about you (libel), you have no right to silence them. \n\nAnd, again, as I said in my last post, saying shit like \"we should not tolerate it\" is silencing. \n\nFinally, \n\n > Would you walk into a berzerker ward at a mental hospital and tell all the people there that you respect their opinions? Their brains don't even work like sane adults. \n\nI respect their freedom of speech. \n\nTake this disagreement as a good example. From my point of view, you're totally wrong. As far as I'm concerned, you're a fucking evil human being who wants to oppress the freedom of speech of people who disagree with you, which makes you the most vile kind of narcissistic authoritarian alive. However, you have every right to have that opinion. I don't respect your views, and nor do I respect you as a human being for having such an abominable viewpoint, but I would defend you if somebody attempted to silence you from speaking it.", "950" ], [ "For one, if <PERSON> were the only top 1% guy in your town and your other options are to move or give up your passion, you'll suffer the douche. \n\nFor two, I said **the people who don't care about flat-earth <PERSON> would also not care about...** - you're obviously someone who very passionately cares about flat-earth <PERSON>, but the fact that <PERSON> is still doing well indicates that there are people who don't care. I'm saying that those same people would not care about an anti-jew <PERSON> if all <PERSON> did was teach public speaking classes. Quite literally, your opinion on whether or not you'd learn from <PERSON> in such a scenario is irrelevant because all I'm saying is that **those people** who support <PERSON> **would also** support pretend-<PERSON>. You don't support <PERSON>, so you can't disagree with the sentiment unless you're just speculating that other people who support <PERSON> wouldn't support <PERSON>. \n\nHonestly, have you ever learned at all about how debating your points work? Or do you just type how you feel all over the keyboard with your face and bash the reply button? \n\nBut again, as I said in the last post, you have every right to say how you feel.", "837" ], [ "You made a wrong turn when you became upset. A rational person just goes \"Huh, that person is wrong.\" and moves on. Everyone is wrong sometimes. Everyone is even willfully ignorant sometimes. It's not always about such an obviously stupid thing, but leave politics out of it and chill out. So a dude believes in some stupid shit and might influence some people into considering stupid shit until they do a modicum of research.. So? \n\nIt isn't like Kron is the next Onision. If there's ANYBODY your views are totally valid for, it's fucking Onision. That guy is a sick fuck, popular on a platform that specifically panders to kids, and is a sexual predator. \n\nSome BJJ guy thinking the earth is flat = nonissue.", "495" ], [ "But I'm saying that turning a blind eye **is a good thing** if it isn't relevant to what you're paying them for. Do you really give a shit if your doctor is a racist as long as he's the best of the best and you aren't a race he hates? Would you rather a more expensive and inferior doctor who isn't racist? I know where my money is going. \n\n<PERSON> is an exception from the rule because, although he was an excellent public speaker, he should've still made people nervous because he got into a position of power. Antisemitism + charisma + position of power = bad things happen. But if he were JUST a public speaking professor at a university who was famous for hating jews, I'd have np learning public speaking from him if the alternatives were inferior. \n\nSimilarly, if <PERSON> got nominated to be some kind of lead science/earth/space guy at NASA tomorrow (AKA a position of power), I'd suddenly have some pretty strong opinions about his qualifications. As for him teaching people BJJ, I really couldn't give less of a fuck about his irrelevant beliefs.", "723" ], [ "You'd be better off responding to him than to me, unless your goal was to just call me a troll rather than actually address the point I made. \n\nIf I see somebody saying that we should \"not tolerate\" other's viewpoints and starts saying that those with contrasting opinions to us are actually **literally** mentally insane people (whose viewpoints *are* discarded, even legally) simply because that person believes in stupid shit like flat-earth, it seems pretty silencing to me. \n\nBut what would I know? You ignored my valid points to call me a troll, so you would know far more about silencing than I would, eh?", "837" ], [ "Well I ain't going to fault you for being so passionate about something, but I'm going to stand by my stance that the \"wrong turn\" you made was becoming upset. Becoming upset about something that is relatively harmless and followed by so few people is \"highly irrational\" as u/markiecunt said, which is at the core of what we're talking about. \n\nNobody is disagreeing with you that flat earth is retarded. We're just not upset over <PERSON> being wrong. If he had a movement that were actually gaining traction and converting tens of millions of people to believe stupid shit, yeah, okay, that's a problem. But there are more serious agendas being pushed in the world. \n\nLike, for example, you mentioned <PERSON>. I don't like politicizing anything, but you apparently have some strong opinions about <PERSON>. Whether I agree with you or not, I think that's worth getting upset about if you disagree with <PERSON> (since he, you know, is actually in a position of power). I can reasonably see you feeling as though <PERSON> will make major negative impacts on things you care about, so it would make sense to me that you would get worked up about it, and that seems rational. Whether you're right or wrong, it seems rational to believe this. \n\nGetting worked up over a guy with a dumb belief who might have like 5 people who agree with him and literally millions of people who think \"dat dumb, guy knows good BJJ tho\" seems excessive.", "647" ], [ "It's a gigantic stretch. People working 2 jobs don't have the time to sit and learn a bunch of astrophysics so they can understand the nuanced details between the various NASA experiments Candidate #1's tax budget would allow for and those that Candidate #2's tax budget would allow for. Some old lady who is 65 and doesn't even own a computer isn't going to learn enough cybersecurity to determine whether CISPA is a valid and necessary additional cyber protection against hackers and terrorists or if it's just the privacy-destroying cybersecurity equivalent of the USA PATRIOT act. \n\nAnd how about people who are just too dumb to think well critically? Some people just can't think critically. They're stupid people. Do we not let them vote? So how do you propose we decide who is smart/dumb (or even just educated) enough? Testing? Who implements the tests? How do we pay for it? How do we ensure no racism? Once you start fucking with who can vote, it's the poor people who are going to get fucked first and foremost. They're the least educated and least protected. Poor people generally vote dem, and I saw your other <PERSON> post, so I get the feeling that you wouldn't like the outcome if you started restricted voting. \n\nIf we want to be idealists, let's skip the \"everyone is perfectly informed and thinks through shit!\" and go with \"let's just have a benevolent dictator who is truly perfect and never makes any mistakes\" because that's just as likely to happen and it'd be way more effective than having elections at all. \n\nBut for the rest of us chilling in the real world, we have to accept that a lot of people lack scientific literacy, lack economic literacy, lack cybersecurity literacy, and even lack physical fitness. They're just people who live shitty lives working at 2 jobs to barely put food on their kids tables, and **they still have a right to voice their opinions for their elected leaders**. If we don't protect their rights, and we start picking and choosing who gets what rights, it won't be long before someone richer/more powerful than us who disagrees with us suddenly decides that **we** are the ones who don't get rights.", "845" ], [ "Additionally, contracts can be voided if the other party knew about the victim being drunk and took advantage of it. Obviously this can be difficult to prove, since the kind of person who takes advantage of somebody who is drunk to sign a contract is unlikely to admit to doing so. \n\nHowever, this seems pretty cut-and-dry sexually. You know when the person you're talking to is drunk, generally. So even still, there is cause not to have sex with someone who is drunk when you know you are taking advantage of it. \n\n**HOWEVER**, somebody being drunk does not necessarily make it a no-go. If you're a 1/10 dude virgin and a 9/10 girl is sloppy drunk and you're making a move and she's not really saying no but not really saying yeah, you're obviously pushing it. On the other hand, if you've been on three dates with a girl and she's been into you, now she's reasonably drunk and suddenly coming onto you harder than before... sounds closer to believing that you aren't just \"taking advantage of it.\" \n\nThere's definitely a gray area here, even using contracts as an example. As for your murder scenario, that's a bit different. The law follows the letter of the law, rather than the intent of the lawbreaker. Signing a contract or consenting to sex has a lot more to do with the intent of the one consenting, and less on the actual letter of the law. \n\nNeedless to say, raping drunk girls is fucking pathetic and disgusting. But it's also totally pathetic and disgusting to ruin someone's life over buyer's remorse or just because they won't be your boyfriend or something.", "442" ], [ "Based on how obvious it is. \n\n1. His girlfriend knew he **accidentally** sent the picture to a girl with a similar name due to her name. <PERSON> vs <PERSON>. Obviously an honest mistake. \n2. Girls/society doesn't make it as big of a deal if someone sees a guy's dick. There's no \"purity\" to be maintained. Even still, only the most virgin/NiceGuy of guy would dump a girl for accidentally showing another dude her tits, and there's even LESS stigma for guys. \n3. If he actually did get dumped over it, it would've been an awful experience. If he even shared the story at all, he'd be showing a lot more regret and a lot less light-hearted banter. \n4. Getting to that light-hearted banter, he's obviously bantering when he said that the other girl is single. Someone said that HER boyfriend would need to send HIS girlfriend their dick, so he jokingly said she's single. He also added, as an obvious joke, that the girl would never consider being with him because he's made himself out to be \"That Guy\" who sends random girls pics of his dick. The truth is, that second girl probably knew he had a girlfriend with basically the same name and wasn't actually disgusted/mad because it's an honest mistake. \n\nNobody broke up or lost friends over this. It's an honest mistake (<PERSON> vs <PERSON>) and nobody would go about changing their life over it.", "480" ], [ "> and eye gouged\n\nYeah. That's why Krav is so successful in UFC. \n\nNo? BJJ is successful there? Well, fuck me! And here I thought eye gouging was the answer to all martial artists! \n\nIf eye gouging were so effective, martial arts never would've been invented. Or they would've only been invented as a means to maximize your ability to eye gouge your opponent while minimizing their means to eye gouge you.", "357" ], [ "To add to this, for u/adrianosimoes \n\n* Always stay moving. If you don't know what to do, grab their lapel. Break their grips. Do SOMETIHNG while you think of your next move. If you do NOTHING, then they will be allowed to think about/execute their next move unmolested. If you start grabbing their lapel, they'll need to at least THINK \"what is he gonna do with that?\" If you break their grip, they need to come up with a new plan. Sometimes, you'll see new openings that your opponent creates just by trying to address these things. \n* Come up with a basic plan for every position. If they're in your guard, go for scissor sweep. If you have side control, try to transition to mount. Etc. If you have some idea of what you want to do, you can at least try something. If they block it, go back to #1 above (and start breaking their grips/grabbing new stuff/etc). Eventually, they'll open themselves up to your attack. For bonus points here, come up with a second plan of attack for every position and just alternate between the two. \n* Tip for mount: pretend you're a table with 4 legs (your 2 knees on mat + 2 hands above their shoulders). Whenever you remove one of those legs (eg, to try to grab their arm or lapel), you are becoming less of a balanced table. Always be aware of where your \"missing legs\" are, and be ready to stop yourself from being swept in that direction (eg, wide base, planted forehead, etc). \n* Elbows in tight, especially on bottom. T-rex arms. \n\nLots of concepts just take time, but with these given so far you should have a decent starting spot. \n\nIt's totally okay as a WB to suddenly get swept or subbed by an opponent that you didn't see coming. There are soooooooooo many different attacks that you can't even remember all the ones you've learned, let alone realize them all at the same time. But it isn't OK to not know what position you're in or what your general goals should be. If you can't say \"OK. I'm in side control. My goal is to get out and get back into turtle or guard or better.\" then you need to review the positional hierarchy. Jiu-Jitsu University is a good book for this. \n\nIf you CAN say that, you next need to say \"OK. I'm in side control. I know I need to get to guard. How do I do that?\" Now it's just an issue of you knowing your escapes. Do you know some escapes? If yes, then try them. If your opponent just blocks them all, accept that they are better than you and drill your escapes more for the future. \n\nAnd it's really just that. On repeat. Forever. Know the positions, know the submissions, come up with a game plan for where you are and where you want to go. Try to execute the game plan. \n\nThe planning is about research/technique collection. The execution is about drilling/sparring to be able to do the technique.", "500" ], [ "Unearthed Raptor didn't see very little play. It saw play in virtually all DR rogue decks, which were pretty good as far as Rogue decks are concerned -- Rogues have just gotten the short end of the stick for a long while. Look at the current content cycling out (TGT through LoE) and you'll see that almost 0 current Rogue cards are actually being removed. Tomb Pillager is almost it. \n\nAnd this card is a lot better than Raptor in a ton of cases due to synergy with other cards, such as Rag (wild), Velen (combo - combo would have to be wild since EmpT removal), and other persistent cards. You can also copy any taunt for a 1/1 taunt, or any divine shield for a 1/1 divine shield, which is completely unique to Raptor's effects. \n\nDR Priest was also better than DR rogue, due to having better DRs and having more survivability to pull off the Nzoth. \n\nThis card will also feed better into Nzoth and other Resurrect-style abilities.", "535" ], [ "Technically, they hate cis-straight people. So cis-gay people are also exempt from their hatred. To be exempt, you may be trans OR LGBT+ \n\nTrans people make up less than 1%, for sure. Some studies have suggested that gays/nonstraights make up roughly 3% of the population. I think this varies greatly depending on how you classify bisexuals, since there are a **lot** more people who are willing to be open sexually and fuck about with the same gender (bisexual/pansexual) than there are people who will outright **reject** the opposite gender (gay). \n\nEither way, cis-straights make up the overwhelming overwhelming majority of people.", "418" ], [ "Gay people have children and shit. The really ironic part is how they'd be FORCED to have MORE children in order to prevent extinction. \n\nKill all cis straights? Well, trans ain't able to reproduce brah. Now all the gay men and lesbians have to go fuck each other and have kids. And not just 1-2 kids to maintain the pop. They need lots of kids in order to repop the world.", "418" ], [ "Nah. It's left with about 90% of normal gay people and normal trans people who would be all like \"WTF have you done?! You fucking retard!\" who are then forced into having sex against their preference in order to have children to restart the population. \n\nAll of these tumblrina anti-cis fucks would probably end up getting murdered by the *normal* gays/trans people who just want to live their fucking lives and not make drama or draw attention to it.", "418" ], [ "Pretty much exactly. The vast majority of gay people are just normal people trying to live their lives. Even many within the \"LGBT community\" are only there because they have legitimate grievances about discrimination against them due to their preferences. \n\nThese horrible people are in the minority, which means they would likely be even MORE fucking discriminated against if they did this (or just straight up fucking murdered for doing it), while the normal LGBT people would then be forced to have sex with the opposite gender to have a bunch of children to repopulate the world. \n\nJust a fucking loss for everyone.", "418" ], [ "Definitely something I find true in children these days. People always say how they don't know how to \"adult.\" \n\nUm, the world is built for fucking stupid people. Anyone can figure shit out. There's limitless people to call, talk to, etc. You can even google shit! And people still don't \"know how\" to do it - really comes down to being too lazy to just look it up or do it because it's boring.", "72" ], [ "It's a shitty comparison. First off, how are we defining secondary sexual characteristics vs primary ones? Simply how we impregnate people, or how things happen DURING SEX? \n\nIf a girl grabs my adam's apple, can I sue for sexual harrassment? Do I FEEL sexually harrassed? If I start fondling a girl's titties, can she sue for sexual harrassment? Does she FEEL sexually harrassed? \n\nWould a man grab or play with a women's boobs during sex? Would a woman grab or play with a man's adam's apple during sex? \n\nMy girlfriend can have orgasms simply from playing with her boobs. I can't have orgasms simply from playing with my adam's apple. \n\nThe asshole isn't used AT ALL in reproduction, but it's still considered a sexual object. \n\nThe balls are not used in the ACT of reproduction, just used to PRODUCE/STORE semen before the act. So using the logic that the boobs are vital to the reproductive process *after the fact*, should I say that the balls are vital to the reproductive process *before the fact*? No. The balls are clearly a sexual object because **women fucking play with them during sex**. \n\nHell, even the lips are more of a sexual object than the adam's apple, but the lips are used in a huge variety of other shit that diminishes this fact (eating, speaking, etc). \n\nBut there's no doubt that the neck is a more-sexual object than your forehead, let's say. As is your lower back. As are your upper legs. And that is **precisely why these areas tend to be more modestly covered up, even if they aren't as legally covered up as boobs/dicks are**. \n\nAnd then the reductio ad absurdum at the end -- our VOICE proves we're male? YOUR voice proves you're female! Our HAIR proves we're male? YOUR hair proves you're female! YOUR lack of an adam's apple proves you're female! What the fuck are we really accomplishing? Even our fucking hands and eyes and feet are different. The SHAPES of our bodies are different. Should we all dress up in amorphous blob costumes to hide ALL of our characteristics? That's really the only fucking way to hide them all! \n\nAnd women wearing bras is largely functional as well. Women with larger breasts will have them fucking sag down and shit, hurt their backs, and not be as mobile (due to flopping about). \n\nThis whole thing is retarded and her equivalence + shitty attitude just makes her look like an idiot.", "506" ], [ "> Aside: I actually agree that legally requiring secondary sex characteristics be covered is stupid.\n\nTo be fair, boobs are not entirely secondary sex characteristics. They are a pretty majorly defining difference. Some women can actually orgasm from boob play. \n\nNot going to exactly find a peer-reviewed scientific paper on it, but a lot of women say it happens and you will find semi-decent articles on it that reference primary sources. Eg: _URL_0_ \n\nAnd from my own personal experience, I have been with two women who could either orgasm exclusively from boob/nipple touching or it helped immensely. \n\nDo the same with my adam's apple. Do the same with my beard. Nah. Not gonna happen. \n\nDo the same with my balls. Yeah. Might happen. \n\nBoobs are about as sexual as balls. They're just located in another place.", "506" ], [ "1. In many places, we DO require it of men or kids. You can't go shirtless inside a grocery store. \n2. Did you even read my comment? It isn't a double standard. Boobs are more closely related to balls than to a man's chest, in terms of being a sexual object, eliciting orgasms, etc. \n3. If we're going to restrict clothing AT ALL for sexual objects, the objects that relate to giving orgasms should obviously all qualify, NOT just the objects related to actual penetration leading to baby production. Boobs, balls, and asshole are all covered for the same reason. It's consistent.", "506" ], [ "Pretty sure we've been trying to make in vitro work really well for a while (\"artificial wombs\") and last I checked it isn't going so hot. \n\nAnd with a world population reduced by so much, and the huge power vaccuums that would be created, the government collapses, etc, I honestly can't imagine anyone will be doing JACK DICK outside of making sure they're farming the land and hunting shit not to die / not to get murdered by renegade warlords. Science will be set back centuries in short order. They won't be making massive scientific breakthroughs.", "795" ], [ "No I mean, there are a ton of gay men who are closeted and marry women and have children and then later (midlife crisis) decide to reject that lifestyle and come out of the closet and leave their wives.. Gays are capable of having children. \n\nBut in an openly gay couple, yeah, adoption is a solution. Mixing your sperm and then donating it into a surrogate is another option for gay men.", "83" ], [ "By her logic, race isn't a real thing. We just give it undue weight, and part of that undue weight is hating people for it. So racism does exist. \n\nBut another part of that undue weight is idolizing another race / trying to become another race / etc. WHICH SHE IS GUILTY OF DOING! \n\nIt's just fucking hypocritical. It's like people who say that gender is a social construct and sex doesn't matter at all, then they get a sex change operation. If your gender is meaningless, why are you paying money / time to get an irreversible sex change operation that indirectly neuters you?", "715" ], [ "If intelligent, normal gays/trans people survived, I think humanity would continue. But SCIENTIFIC ADVANCEMENTS sure as fuck wouldn't continue. Who has the time to sit in a lab **funded by nobody because all your bosses/bankrollers/wealthy investors are dead** and try to cure disease or make progress on in-vitro and shit? \n\nThere'd be a short period where everything is still available -- internet, grocery stores with fresh food, etc. During that time, smart people would have to quickly download anything relevant to learning how to farm/hunt/etc, communicate with all alive humans to try to form into groups/cities, and PRAY they have enough specialized people that you will at least still have a working townwide electricity and associated internet, where you then have to house all of the data about farming and shit. Then, you and your fellow survivors are looting nearby places for farming equipment and shit to ensure you have the food to eat, etc. \n\nMAYBE through some hard work and cooperation (assuming no warlords/druglords/etc are created to wreck it up), they can keep a smaller version of current society that will be technologically/scientifically crippled for at least a few centuries just based on the population size, but they might keep the internet and enough books/documentation to keep \"modern society\" functional, to some degree. \n\nBut sooo much shit would fall apart. Entire companies that just happen to have 0-1 gay people in positions of power or technological experience will die. Eg, even if apple's CEO happened to be gay, that person won't know diddly about actually maintaining their network, their cell towers, their R & D, etc.. Apple is gone, so iPhone support is dead, and existing iPhones will eventually break, and we won't be making any new phones unless people reverse engineer what they've got and figure it out. And who the fuck has the time for that (refer to point 1 - nobody can research since there are no rich bankrollers who are gonna support it). \n\nEven if they pull it off, there are OTHER companies that will die. Soooo much will be lost.", "795" ], [ "> You're arguing that some women get off because if their boobs, but so do some men. \n\nYou're telling me that some men can climax simply from nipple stimulation? I have some serious doubts. A solid % of women can climax simply from nipple stimulation. I'm not going to make up a %, but it's greater than 1%. If greater than 1% of men can orgasm from nipple stimulation alone I'd be totally fucking shocked. \n\n > One cannot reproduce (the goal of sex) without balls, but one can without boobs.\n\nIf we're gonna talk about the GOAL of sex, then boobs fit here as well. Reproduction is the goal, and women use their breasts to feed the child. Boobs are used after sex like balls are used before it. \n\nAnd if we wanted to get REALLY childish (\"technical\"), we can start saying that penises aren't needed for reproduction anymore since sperm donation and shit exists and you can extract that junk straight from the balls. So let's just remove the concept of indecent exposure/sexual assault altogether because **obviously** only the **required** sexual organs should fit the mold, rather than all of the ancillary ones that get heavily used in sex/reproduction (like the boobs and the balls). \n\n > Why draw the line at orgasm, and not at reproduction? \n\nAssholes have nothing to do with reproduction, but are used for sex. And are similarly disallowed. \n\n > If I bring an example of someone that orgasms from their ears being rubbed, are you going to say we must cover ears?\n\nLet's not drive this down like children and say \"Oh one person in the world orgasms from their eyes being poked\" and be adults. The VAST MAJORITY of women draw sexual satisfaction from their boobs being touched, SOME to the point of orgasm. Relatively speaking, FEW men get anything out of their chest being stroked (anything more than, say, any other part of their body being stroked), and the amount that would orgasm from such a thing is.. possibly 0 but I'm willing to entertain a number that's a fraction of a fraction of 1%. \n\nAdditionally, I would not feel sexually assaulted if a man grabbed my ears and played with them. Nor would I feel sexually assaulted if they started rubbing my Adam's apple. If a dude ran up and stuffed two fingers up my ass I would, even if it had NOTHING TO DO with \"reproduction.\" Similarly if a guy just ran up and thrust his exposed anus a few cm from my face. \n\nIf a woman were at a nude beach and I ran up and started groping her tits and smearing my face all over them, that's sexual assault. It isn't the same as if she did it to me, where it'd just be normal assault. Are you saying we should change the laws, too? If I run up to a random woman and hold her down and fondle her breasts until she orgasms, is that just normal assault as well? \n\nThis is a ridiculous rabbit hole of bullshit. If you still disagree, I'm satisfied agreeing to disagree, but you won't change my mind. Breasts are very sexual and NOT purely because society says so. They are obviously a clear step up from just being a \"sexual characteristic\" the same way that male hair is. \n\nI can respect that you have a different opinion, but the rationale you're giving me is just semantic hairsplitting and extreme strawman examples. This isn't an equality issue. \n\nFWIW, I'm a libertarian and would prefer absolutely no clothing restrictions whatsoever. Let me run around with my cock out if that's what I want to do. My eyes and my children's eyes are not going to be scarred from just seeing some no-no parts. But for as long as the law says we gotta cover up our sexy bits, boobs are a sexy bit. \n\nAnd that's all I'll be saying about it.", "524" ], [ "Probably awful. \n\nThe only time that you could have put $100,000,000 into Nano and not just owned the entire coin (which would severely undermine its value due to centralization concerns -- dPoS double-spending, for example) would have been when it was at least ~$20 per coin. Then, you would have owned around 1/20 of the coin (a bit less, but let's be generous). And now, you'd be down around 95%. \n\nIf you purchased it at ANY time lower than now (~ < $1), you would have bought over 80-90% of the total currency and killed its value. \n\nAnd in the process, you would have spiked the market so hard during your buy order that you would've overspent for a lot of it. Possibly offsetting some of the early negative consequences, but not entirely. \n\nEither way, it would be up there among some of the worst things you can do with $100mil when it came to investing.", "1008" ], [ "This isn't accurate. I actually did a pass over it with Burp. \n\nBitgrail had two vulnerabilities that I found if I remember correctly: \n\n1. Race conditions on trades. You could post two trades basically at the ~same time and both would go through. \n2. Business logic failure with makers/matchers. You could put a buy order for something low (let's say 1 satoshi) and then post a sell for that exact price (1 satoshi). The buyer will \"buy\" it for 1 satoshi, but the seller will sell it at market price.", "937" ], [ "The article does a poor job of explaining it. The issues were in the business logic on his shitty website. \n\nNano foundation isn't responsible to do a security audit of his website, and it's wacky to think that they would be. \n\nAdditionally, even if they say \"you can trust <PERSON>\" and <PERSON> scams you, they aren't liable as long as they aren't a co-conspirator. You might think it's a dick move, but _legally_ they are not liable. Not in any domain, and especially not here. \n\nYou might say that they are not \"cleared\" in terms of moral obligations or whatever, but I doubt that was u/tomtomlink's point.", "452" ], [ "Ehh but Bitgrail had legit problems where people could steal crypto. I once had the opportunity to steal something like 2 BTC from the site when a bug gave me twice as much currency as I should have bought. \n\nBasically: I wanted to trade some amount of XRB for 1 BTC. The trade went through but gave me 2 BTC (this is an oversimplification; also the trade was against LTC but let's stick with BTC for easy math). \n\nI could have immediately withdrawn the 2 BTC from the exchange and told everyone \"go fuck yourselves!\" and profited 1 BTC. And because of that fact, I am sure others did. \n\nBut I didn't. Because I didn't even realize the mistake at the time. A few days later, I got hit with a negative amount of Nano equal to 1 BTC, and I could not withdraw anything until I cleared the negative Nano. \n\nSo I waited like 2 weeks when Nano dropped or some shit and spent 0.5 BTC to clear the negative XRB, so it was as if I had taken 1 BTC \"on margin\" from Bitgrail and used it to turn a profit. \n\nThe fact is that what I did costed Bitgrail 0.5 BTC. A faster actor would have just withdrawn the 2 BTC immediately and costed Bitgrail 1 full BTC. \n\nThese are all sample numbers, but it was only a few grand. Nothing in the overall 120 million shortfall that Bitgrail had, but I bet other people stole a lot.", "1008" ], [ "With all due respect, this is the conflation of multiple bugs over time. Bitgrail had a lot of different bugs. Some got fixed faster than others. \n\n[Here's a post I made 2-3 years ago in RaiTrade](_URL_0_). In it, I specifically said this: \n\n > The BitGrail withdrawal bug (AKA 'BitGrail was only running one node???') was given a real fix (not just the band-aid \"run a second node!\" fix) within 3 hours after discovery. Current XRB withdraw bug is a separate XRB bug \n\nBitgrail suffered 4 separate (major) glitches to my memory: \n\n1. Bid-ask mixmatches. This was solved in ~December. They claimed little theft/abuse as a result. \n2. Bid-ask denial of service. I forget the exact method, but people could stop the entire exchange from functioning properly by doing something stupid with the bids/asks. Future bids/asks weren't going through or something. Sorry, I just can't remember. \n3. 2-3 *separate rounds* of withdrawal bugs, where people just couldn't withdraw their XRB. The final one was for *nearly a month* IIRC. \n4. The actual \"suffered a stole\" due to race conditions and some other shit. \n\nOriginally, FF was very good and very cooperative with the Nano team. He had them work alongside him to fix things as they came up. And they were on good terms. \n\nWhen \"suffered a stole\" happened, the team found out about it shortly before we did. He reached out to them and basically asked them to cover it up or some shit, and they withdrew from him altogether, contacted an attorney, and stopped recommending him. \n\nYou are making it sound like they knew about the \"suffered a stole\" security concerns before it happened. This is simply not true. They knew about other bugs with the exchange _before_, when FF was working actively alongside them to fix the issues. \n\nIt was hard to find, but [this](_URL_2_) was the conversation they had with <PERSON>. <PERSON> reached out and was just urgently saying that the developers needed to fork the protocol because he suffered a stole. They pretty much immediately withdrew from discussions, contacted an attorney, told him they couldn't help him with his problem since it was a bug on his end. IIRC, he threatened them saying that he would spread FUD that it was a bug in the protocol. Then he didn't announce it, so they announced next-day that Bitgrail was insolvent. \n\nWhen the hack was announced, devs got a lot of flak over [shit like this](_URL_1_). But it wasn't their fault. That was over node issues that caused withdrawal problems for a month before the hack was known (which I believe had an official publication date of ~Feb 9th). A lot of crap was misattributed to the developers. \n\nLong story short: I don't believe the devs are responsible. Did they recommend a shady exchange? Yeah. But they recommended it when the owner was appearing to operate in good faith, making a constant, conscious effort to fix bugs as they happened. Did Bitgrail have problems? Yeah. But Bitgrail was 1 of 2 fucking exchanges for XRB back then, with the other major one being MercaTox which took, at one point, 3+ months to withdraw from. People were calling it Mc.Tox and shit because they all thought they were being scammed. We didn't have a wide variety of good options. There was a period where Bitgrail was unironically the best exchange (or so it seemed). \n\nPlus, you have to keep in mind that this is the same dev team that distributed the funds via faucets primarily targeting third world nations. <PERSON> is someone who idealistically wants to change the world for the better. Not someone I necessarily agree with, but someone who genuinely seems like a good guy. What motive would the devs have to deceive us? \n\nWhether it be altruism or personal greed, I just don't see any scenario where, logically, the devs would intentionally deceive us. Because I don't follow the logic, and I *lived through it* and saw no evidence of foul play on their end, I believe they are clear.", "586" ], [ "Holy fucking shit. \n\nLet me preface this by my saying I LOVE peanut butter. I am one of those degenerates. I've had days where I just ate 12+ peanut butter and jelly sandwiches for the day. I've had MONTHS where I ate pb & j's every single day. \n\nAt first, I loved how this looked. The peanut butter looked gooey as fuck. I hate crust. This was amazing. Not in love with strawberry jam (more of a grape dude), but this looked solid. \n\nAnd then the people just started... ripping it fucking open, and it was weird. \n\nThen, midway through, they started adding some SLOPPY fucking pecan butter and shit, marshmellows... when the dude started grinding the orange zest on the shit I actually started laughing. And the people just kept MANGLING THE SANDWICHES ROFL \n\nThis was truly worth watching. A gem for sure. I love you.", "530" ], [ "And they had those fucking demonic smiles like \"SEE? SEE WHAT WE ARE DOING???\" Like they were embracing childhood all over again. It was spilling out the back onto their hands, and they were licking it off their fucking fingers in a way that [reminded me of my favorite passage from the book Damnation Game](_URL_0_) \n\n > But the grossest image in the pack was that of the <PERSON>. He was a coprophiliac, and sat down before a plateful of steaming excrement, his eyes vast with greed, while a scabby monkey, its bald face horribly human, bared its puckered backside to the viewer. \n > \n > <PERSON> picked up the card and studied the picture. The leering face of the shit-eating fool brought the bitterest of smiles to his bloodless lips. This was surely the definitive human portrait. The other pictures on the cards, with their pretensions to love and physical pleasure, only hid this terrible truth away for a while. Sooner or later, however ripe the body, however glorious the face, whatever wealth or power or faith could promise, a man was escorted to a table groaning under the weight of his own excrement and obliged, even though his instincts might revolt, to eat. \n > \n > That was what he was here for. To make a man eat shit.", "34" ], [ "> Gamers are typically internet savvy though\n\nI'm a gamer, internet savvy (hacker for my job), and love physical shit. Almost every single game I bought for switch was physical. \n\nCounterpoint: I hate going outside, so I ordered it all off of Amazon and won't be reselling any of it to Gamestop despite having almost all of the games, including my switch. So it just collects dust.", "265" ], [ "The theory is definitely explained elsewhere out there, so I would recommend you read about it if you'd like the full detail from the ground-up, but basically I'll tell you why _I, personally_ think it is the best and most likely theory: \n\n1. It's <PERSON>'s style and <PERSON>'s dream. It's genre defying. Saying that the main character is \"the prophecy of legend\" kinda cheapens <PERSON>'s whole schtick, including that he wants to be the _freest man_. If he has to fulfill some destiny/prophecy, then he isn't really free. He's said it himself: he **doesn't want to be a hero**. His dream is not to change/save the world, but to live *for himself*. \n2. It would give <PERSON> a \"purpose\" as a crewmate. I know that her status as a crewmate is debatable, but if the series ends with her basically saying she was always a crewmate, just serving her purpose _off the ship_, and her being the coming of JoyBoy and becoming a successful princess in order to have that political capital is what was required... then she did what she had to do in order to contribute to the ship in her own way. In fact, she would be the unique thing that <PERSON>'s crew had which <PERSON>'s crew did not. The reason why <PERSON>'s crew could lead to the second coming of JoyBoy where <PERSON> himself was not that second coming. \n3. I<PERSON> was holding <PERSON>'s picture. If she was just some random princess in a random nation with vague ties to the straw hats from 2.5 years ago and no contact since, that would be... kinda strange. Keep in mind that the straw hats also have ties to <PERSON>, the king of Sakura Kingdom (ex Drum Kingdom), the king of Dressrosa, the king of Fishman Island, and more. And yet he was holding HER picture? \n4. There's this powerful scene when they first arrive on Drum Island. <PERSON> was just shot by a scared guard and they were all on edge over <PERSON>. <PERSON> was about to let loose, and <PERSON> says \"it's okay\" and bows with her head to the ground, monumentally telling <PERSON> \"You are not fit to be the captain\" because he was unable to show humility in asking for help saving <PERSON>. It was a powerful scene and demonstrated her abilities as a leader (which we were, quite frankly, hammered over the head with; from the flashbacks to the reverie where she was a young girl and <PERSON> hit her, to the whole <PERSON> arc proper....), which is the exact kind of thing that JoyBoy is _supposed_ to be IMO. \n\nThere is more evidence/reasoning, but these were the parts of the theory that really resonated with me personality. It made me not just think that it could be <PERSON>, but _feel_ like it would completely make sense. It would justify her spot in the story. It's _so Oda_ to make a character who we all thought was \"temporary\" 800 chapters ago to actually have been \"part of the crew, in their own way, this entire time.\"", "475" ], [ "> If nano ever got to $100, even 0.1 nano would be worth more than 5x the daily salary of a quarter of the world's population. \n\nIs this true? $2 is more than the \"daily salary\" of a quarter of the world's population? \n\n25% of people are living on less than ~$730 per year? \n\nWhere the fuck is this located? I can't seem to go to anywhere - any backwater country - any bumfuck area in that country - and be treated like a God for $500.", "392" ], [ "> I think what you want is get_timer()\n\nNope. That'd force him to use `delta_time` and make it a non-frame-bound game, which I suspect is above his head and not worth doing for this kind of game anyway -- it isn't likely to suffer from FPS-intensive actions, and doing delta_time stuff would just needlessly complicate it. GML has no built in `get_frame()`. \n\n > Also, in GML you really don't want to prepend everything with self.\n\nI have yet to learn of any reason NOT to prepend instance variables with `self.` and I can think of multiple reasons TO prepend things with `self.` -- for what reason are you suggesting it's bad?", "590" ], [ "To be fair, the manual is also written very poorly and by somebody who does not seem to be a professional. I do not treat it as the Word of God. \n\nI can think of several reasons why using `self` is better than not using it, so unless somebody has some definitive answer here beyond \"the manual says,\" I am going to opt to keep using `self.` -- the main reason not to use `self` IMO has been resolved in the latest GMS update, where `self` variables are now trackable within the debugger. \n\nEDIT: I didn't want my response to just be \"shit-talking the devs\", so I gave a more detailed write-up about using explicit `self.` [here](_URL_0_).", "95" ], [ "> It is good practice to encapsulate all with curly braces, even if it is just one statement.\n\nI would like to stress for everyone who is learning how true this is. \n\nThe [heartbleed exploit in OpenSSL](_URL_1_) that rocked the internet like half of a decade ago was [at least partially due to a lack of clarity in code flow due to the omission of optional braces](_URL_0_).", "966" ], [ "Have you considered simply drawing the (radius) circle around the red origin circle? That would make things quite a bit easier. \n\nIf not, then probably you need to solve for the x,y where two functions intersect, which would mean: \n\n1. Create a formula for each object. \n\n The line between the two circles would be y = mx + b, where `m` is equal to `tan(degtorad(point_direction(red_circle_x, red_circle_y, mouse_x, mouse_y)))`, and `b` would be `-12` I think. \n\n The circle would be x^2 + y^2 = r^2 IIRC \n\n2. Then solve both into a single formula: \n\n Since `y = tan()x - 12`, `x = (y + 12)/tan()` \n\n Substituting that into the formula of the circle would yield: \n\n `y = -(y + 12/tan())^2 + r^2 \n\n Recall: `r` is a constant and `tan` is known \n\n3. Simplify into value for quadratic equation: \n\n -y^2 - 24y/tan() + y - 144/tan()^2 + r^2 = 0 \n\n Since `tan()` is known and `r` is a known, this would end up being something like (using `a = -1` and `b = -24/tan() + 1` and `c = r^2` as constants): \n\n ay^2 + by + c = 0\n\n4. Do quadratic equation. I just now realized that I was supposed to solve for `x` in the quadratic equation, but it doesn't matter don't worry. \n\n y = (-b +/- sqrt(b^2 - 4ac)) / 2a \n\n So...\n\n y = ((24/tan()+1) +/- sqrt((24/tan()+1)^2 - 4*(-1)*r^(2)) / -2\n\n That'll give two values. One will be positive and one will be negative. This makes sense, because the line will *of course* intersect with your circle at two different locations (one in front of your character and one behind them). You could rule out the one behind them by simple math. And now that you know one value (`y`), you can just plug it into either of the above equations to solve the other value (`x`). \n\nThis is substantially more work than just centering around the red circle. \n\n_Disclaimer: I'm not even 100% certain that this will work (but like 90% sure). I have never done it before, and it has been over 10 years since I left university so my math/memory of math formulae might be off._ \n\nGood luck if you go that approach.", "53" ], [ "> get_timer() doesn't require delta time, but delta time would be perfectly appropriate and not that difficult to implement.\n\n`get_timer()` without delta time would be like trying to count time over frames instead of frames over frames.. Just not a good approach. \n\n > Seems rather insulting to assume it's over OP's head, to be honest. \n\nThere's nothing wrong with acknowledging that different people are less experienced. I've seen delta_time go horribly wrong, and there's no reason for it in this style of game. It's added complexity with no pay-off. \n\n > It's ok if you haven't learned it yet, but it should be a goal. \n\nNo offense, mate, and I respect what you do in this community, but everything that has been shown between us has **severely** indicated to me that you should be asking me for advice, not being condescending. \n\n > As for self, it's important to understand that everything in GameMaker is essentially a numeric ID. \n\nThis doesn't matter that it's just `-1`. It adds clarity. Variables are just registers & memaddresses under the hood, but we give them names instead of naming them all garbly-gook to add clarity. It's like that. Just because \"a\" is shorter than `self.angle` does not mean it's better. \n\n > Outside of those contexts, it might be recognized as something else or not recognized at all. \n\nThe context I gave was not one of those, and I am not sure to what you are referring anyway. \n\n > YoYo Games has also warned that the usage of self may change in future updates to GML, so it's best not to rely on it too heavily now. \n\nFirst: show proof. Second: I strongly doubt that it would change in such a way as to break `self.` referencing variables. By all means, don't attempt to do crap like `other.anchor = self` because (while that works, technically...) it's hugely risky that some day that will just set `other.anchor` to `-1`. Use `other.anchor = _URL_0_` \n\n > And finally, it just makes your code needlessly longer and more cluttered. \n\nDisagree. Explicit is better than implicit. \n\n > There's no functional advantage to it, and if anything, it creates bad habits. \n\nOutright not true and based on nothing but subjective feelings. *Not* using it creates bad habits. \n\n > In GML, object.property is much slower than `with (object) { property }`, so you should always use the latter where applicable. \n\nIrrelevant. If you want to reference other object properties, using a single `object.property` is faster than using `with()`. When calling multiple object properties, it is faster to use `with`. Also, sometimes you need to do something like: \n\n with (all) {\n self.x += other.x\n }\n\nThere is no way to be inside of both `self` scopes at the same time. And you are far better off to be explicit about which is `self` and which is `other` in this instance. \n\nAs for `self` itself, my testing has found that it adds no latency to function calls. \n\n[I already gave a thorough response here](_URL_1_), and your response is... painfully lacking in respect for someone who certainly knows more about this than you do. \n\nI'll spare us both the headache from engaging with you any further, but you are absolutely wrong about this. For anyone reading: being explicit about which object you are referring to is a **good** programming practice. And using `long_and_unambiguous_names` is always preferable to using `short_ambiguous_ones`. Don't listen to someone who thinks that you are \"cluttering up your code\" by being explicit. \n\nI gave a sample of my coding in my OP of this thread. I doubt anyone would say that it's cluttered, and I doubt that you produce cleaner and more well-commented code than that. I'll leave it at that.", "95" ], [ "I envy that you actually got to learn programming in high school. I probably sound ancient, but I'm only 30 years old. In my high school, we had shitty insanely-old Mac machines with AWFUL 1970's arcade style games like Asteroids. All of our \"comp sci\" classes were about excel. \n\nKeep in mind, I am 30 -- born in '90 -- I was in high school in ~2006. This wasn't the stone age of the internet. WoW was already out -- _WoW: TBC was already out_! I taught myself C/C++, Java, SQL, and more around when I was 12. I was already four years deep into programming, and my school (a great school in every other way, mind you) was still teaching us MS Word and Excel. \n\nI really envy anybody who actually got to grow up with \"programming\" as something that's even offered in school. Everyone should know how to program. I was VERY lucky that I taught myself. My life would have been completely different had I not. And everyone else in my generation who did not teach themselves or go to school for it... are at a huge disadvantage, to be frank.", "704" ], [ "> you aint timin anything\n\nHere's what you said. \n\nFor people who saw the price then and decided that it was unwise to buy at that price and chose to wait and buy at a lower price, they absolutely \"timed\" it. \n\nNobody can time the markets all the time. And not everybody can time the market at the same time. But some of the people can time some of the markets some of the time.", "937" ], [ "I did say a global timer: \n\n > One way to accomplish this would be to have a global step timer in a control object that is created when the game starts OR the tutorial ends (i.e., morning on the first day). Let's put this object instance into our first level and give it the instance name `control`. \n\nI wasn't clear in subsequent portions of the post that other NPCs should be referencing *its* daynight time though, e.g. `control.timer`, `control.day`, `control.hour`, etc.", "174" ], [ "Or it's just you subconsciously agreeing with the racist/nationalist undertones. \n\nJust saying, if I saw some guy say \"Some people are heroes, and some people are villains. Even women have some good people!\" I would think for sure that they're a sexist. \n\nIf English is his second language, I take it back. But for a native speaker, the \"even\" implies that there is some \"understandable notion\" that Americans are evil, and that some Americans are good people *despite* that fact.", "389" ], [ "It's insane. \n\nA fish DF in OP is insane. Insanely rare. Unheard of. Unseen. Just crazy. Might completely nullify or partially nullify the DF weakness. \n\nOn top of that, Mythical Zoan DF's are rare. Insanely rare. Rarer than Logias. The rarest of all rare. \n\nAnd to top it off, his fruit is basically the fucking Magikarp dude. This DUDE evolved into GYRADOS through his awakening. Holy shitballs.", "300" ], [ "Yes. Though it's unclear whether Zoans are allowed to remain transformed after entering water. \n\n<PERSON> is shown not to revert back to his full reindeer form (\"Walk Point\") when in water, instead staying in his hybrid form (bipedal baby chopper). However, this could admittedly be an inconsistency due to <PERSON> just being used to <PERSON> being in that form as his \"main\" form.", "517" ], [ "Nano needs to be obtainable off of exchanges if people are ever going to use it as a currency anyway. \n\nLike, what's with this notion that this coin is *at all* useful as a currency if the current only real way to get it (or get out of it) involves signing up for crap exchanges and paying 3 diff exchange fees just to get to the goods. \n\nReally just need a site that exchanges cash to nano with no sign-up. Go in, paypal cash, get nano back. Or nano in, get paypaled cash. Probably illegal but would be actually useful.", "71" ], [ "> That being said, you seem like to have a background in enterprise software. \n\nNope. I'm a hacker for my day job who got his start in coding for the game industry. \n\n > Can bad code backfire and only cause more issues later on? Yes, absolutely, however that's not really a problem in game dev. Just patch it later on \n\nIt's really amusing to me that you think this *doesn't* apply to enterprise code, though. It does. It especially applies to security (my field). \n\nCode the database accessors that are grabbing customer's social security numbers like shit? No big deal. We'll just suffer a huge multi-million dollar breach and then patch some security in later, haha! \n\nIt's sad -- you might think I'm joking or exaggerating, but I'm honestly not. \n\nAs for the rest of your post -- I am not sure I understand your point. I'm not trashing the engine or the company. I get why they do what they do. \n\nThe thing is people have *misinterpretted* not to use `self`, and fairly enough. There are legitimate things that you cannot do with `self` in this language that you can do with `self`/`this` in other languages, and there are SOME causes to take pause before using self, *especially* in edge cases where you are attempting to use `self` as an **object** (it isn't). \n\nHowever, this is a \"learn to walk before you learn to run\" thing. I've learned to run; `self.x` is an acceptable use-case for the `self` prefix. Others are afraid to run and are actively advocating to **NEVER** use `self`. This is just wrong, and I am just clarifying the misunderstanding. \n\nI am not on some crusade against YoYo, their manual, beginner programmers, or people who hate `self`. \n\nA dude had a question. I gave him an answer (and have yet to see anyone else supply a better answer). Some people who didn't know better tried to correct my use of `self`. I had some respect for one of those people because I have seen some of his work, and I know him to be beyond \"beginner\" level, and so I felt that I owed it to him to explain to him why he was wrong about `self`, so I proceeded to systematically debunk the myths about self -- including the notion that the manual was a resource that was intended for an advanced audience. It isn't. It's intended for beginners, and so it sometimes oversimplifies or underexplains a premise in order not to confuse beginners. It's a \"learn to walk before you run\" thing. \n\nUltimately, I have no horse in the race of whether or not people use `self`. But I know it to be the best practice here, and so I will keep using it in the way I do. And now that I have written & saved my long explanation regarding the proper use of the keyword, I will be able to paste it any time somebody in the future replies to me saying not to use `self` incorrectly. And that's a win.", "440" ], [ "Removed. This post reeks of desperation and shitcoinery. I'd be embarrassed if someone new came to the sub and saw this title alone. \n\n > a lot of things got people hyped, and that’s why we hit $37. Binance listing, name change, etc. \n\nThis is also just patently untrue, and you obviously weren't around back then. The name change and Binance listing almost perfectly coincided with XRB _tanking_.", "928" ], [ "> My gosh. So you completely ignore my point about self functioning differently across different exports because it runs counter to your narrative.\n\nI ignored your point because it was a lot of \"I think, I can't really remember\" with no real proof. Provide some proof that `self` ever functions identically to `self.object_index`. \n\n > If prefixing every variable in instance scope with self was the recommended and documented way of accessing instance variables, the entire manual would be written differently. \n\nThe manual is written inconsistently anyway. How it demonstrates examples is not proof of \"best coding practices.\" \n\nThe examples it gives for `self` that it explicitly states are acceptable and intended are the EXACT situation that I am using `self`: as a prefix for instance variables. \n\n > as you can do the same task more efficiently and appropriately using other keywords or functions \n\nYou cannot do the same task more efficiently in this instance. What this is referring to, again, is the `var a = self` context, which is safer (and more efficient) to perform via `var a = _URL_0_`. \n\n`self.` does not cause a loss of efficiency, as I demonstrated in my post. \n\n > You can continue to write code however you like, but trying to convince everyone that this method is far better for GML is silly. \n\nExcept it does work better for the reasons I gave, which you did not address at all, such as variable renaming. \n\nYou want to rename all variables in your entire program from using `x` and `y` to using `position[0]` and `position[1]` due to some infrastructure change? Good luck. You will have to rewrite it from scratch basically, as you can't just replace `x` and `y` with a script unless you want to deal with your script hitting every single variable/function/keyword that happens to have an `x`/`y` in the name. \n\nHowever, `self.x` and `self.y`? Could be replaced into `self.position[0]` and `self.position[1]` with an external script. That's a huge bonus. \n\nAnd let's pretend for a moment that the worst comes to pass -- `self` is some day entirely broken or removed from the language. Let's just pretend that. \n\nHow hard would it be to fix? **Trivial** -- I could regex-replace `self.` with `\"\"` in a matter of minutes. Your \"worst case scenario\" for me is a trivial 2-second fix, and it's so _unreasonably unlikely_ that it doesn't even come close to outweighing the pro's that you get from using `self.`, including **being explicit**, which must not be understated. \n\n > As I said in my comment, thorough testing and usage of things that the manual does not do, such as room looping, have been done before and worked absolutely fine until they did not. \n\nIrrelevant. I don't care that you (or people) were obviously playing with fire and got burnt. I'm not suggesting doing something stupid with `self` that is some kind of weird, hacky edge-case that was never intended. \n\nI'm literally saying to use `self` as a prefix for instance variables, which is the one and only purpose of the entire concept. The only way that my suggestion will stop working is if they remove `self` from the entirety of the language. \n\nIf they change how `self` works in a way that will affect me, it will also negatively affect everybody who uses `self` for *any* reason, including reasons that are documented within the manual. \n\nOnce again, **I am using self in the exact way that is explicitly encouraged in the manual: to prefix instance variables**. \n\nSorry, bud, but you are very wrong about this.", "95" ], [ "> They are panicking. They have to get people entrenched in Bitcoin before everyone finds out / has access to NANO\n\nI wish people on this sub would abandon this retarded conspiracy theory. \n\nHow can you say out one side of your mouth \"NANO IS SO CHEAP!!!\" and out the other side \"Rich people are panicking because Nano is disruptive!!!\" \n\nAnyone with half of a brain knows that BTC will succeed regardless of Nano's success. The next logical step is that if someone has 10 billion dollars they could throw 0.1% of that into Nano and own like roughly 3% of the TOTAL supply, and then they could just put out bullish news and watch their investment go 100x+. \n\nThe rich aren't suppressing Nano. The rich aren't afraid of Nano. \n\nWhether it's because they are right or wrong is left to be determined.", "1008" ], [ "> Just gonna hold just cuz I don't care anymore. The money is lost and I'm not gonna get it back.\n\nBan this fucking moron. This isn't OG WSB or investor attitude. This is classic newspeak \"ape\" retardation from WSB. \n\nCut your fucking losses dumbass. If you utterly refuse, at least go out in a blaze of glory by cashing out and YOLOing it into some high risk $0.01 FD's. \n\nWSB isn't a crypto subreddit and this place sure as fuck shouldn't be either.", "96" ], [ "> Look at Chewy (where RC came from), it is at $100ish.\n\nThis is the EXACT problem with retarded newbies like you posting and people believing you like you know fuck all about finances. \n\n$CHWY's market cap is 10x's GME. They've released around 6-7 more total shares, dipshit. If GME reaches CHWY's market cap, then GME would have a price per share of around $640. \n\nJesus christ. Talk about blind leading the blind over here. You've turned this place into a shitty GME cult.", "928" ], [ "He's right. Anyone still holding \"CUZ I WON'T SELL AT A LOSS\" only to suffer bigger losses is the ultimate retard. OG's of this sub got out in the $300+ range, while the new \"OMG APE\" crowd has been eating their ramen about their \"SOCIAL MOVEMENT\" that they will inevitably be depressed about in a few months when everyone else forgets about it and they're just left carrying expensive ass bags. \n\nAnd I also profited. [17.5k to 107.5k; $41 - > $250](_URL_0_)", "928" ], [ "I also empathize with the people who lost a lot, however... \n\n > The weekend destroyed them and with that you were given one last chance on Tuesday, but after that oof. It sucks.\n\nThe timeline was honestly quite generous. I live on the west coast and I woke up late on Monday - missing market open by 2+ hours. I casually did some work for my dayjob, checked the stock, checked some basic news, and saw the tweet by S3 saying that short interest fell to 50%. \n\nThe trading price was then at $230. I set a sell order for $250 and I walked away for a few hours. Got lucky because it hit (at the top -- the top was $251!!!) before the price continued to tumble downward. \n\nI got lucky, but I also wasn't vigilant at all about it. I had spoken with friends last Friday saying that I was planning on cashing out on Monday regardless. \n\nIf I had my entire life savings in there, I would've acted much more quickly and would've likely sold on market open (for ~$315). \n\nThis ride down has been very slow. We're 4 days into it and STILL at around $70. For perspective, it went from $45 to $150 in effectively one trading day worth of time (mid-morning Friday to mid-morning Monday). We haven't seen a dip of that nature in return.", "928" ], [ "> <PERSON> is lame for doing the AMA and encouraging people to hold.\n\nHe was just incredibly neutral and said something that you could take from it what you want. What he said was along the lines of \"Think of the thesis of why you bought the stock: if you believe that thesis is still valid, go for it\" \n\nMost people's thesis was \"I'm a retarded sheep and listened to other people\" so naturally they're still in.", "495" ], [ "Holy shit. You're right! \n\nI sorted by controversial but still had to skip a few posts to find the gems: \n\n > It's good stuff but the real world is completely indistinguishable from parody at this point \n\n... \n\n > Ok, this all sounds fantastic and all, I’m literally an infant in trading. but I tried to look up this term u just suggested, but I can’t find anything remotely related. Do you have any references? Thanks! \n\nby the same guy saying gems like this: \n\n > Still holding, no other option at this point! \n\n... \n\n > Why is every company on the market not p in arms about this week? \n\n... \n\n > glad they didnt show short interest to 0 that would have meant retail holds zero shares. \n\n??? LOL \n\n > Fuck it...I'm all in ! \n\n... \n\n > <PERSON> you are fucking smart \n\n... \n\n > He sounds wrong, but I dont know enough about stocks to tell. \n\n... \n\n > That’s max cash stack boys. $tonks to the moon 🌝 \n\nHoly shit. So many people bought this up.", "96" ], [ "> I can't remember the last time someone on the internet cared about each other enough to post nonstop fud for days on end.\n\nGo on any incel forum. I guarantee you will find some people there trying to enlighten the incels. \n\nThis sub is a cult. A small % of people are trying to help out the cultists to recognize that they are being swindled. Another large % of people just want their sub back. \n\nGo to GMEstreetbets and leave WSB alone.", "434" ], [ "> Idk fuck all about finance. But if it was all over and the squeeze had already happened and etc etc, why would there be a coordinated effort to bring down morale here?\n\nBecause of [shit like this](_URL_0_)? \n\nListen, it isn't complicated. We want two things: \n\n1. That people wake up and realize they're in a cult. This is some Qanon level shit with \"WAIT 3 DAYS UNTIL AN UNDISCLOSED BENEFACTOR IS GOING TO BUY IN FOR BILLIONS!!!\" \n\n Don't believe me? How about this: just set your own time schedule until \"THE BILLIONAIRE\" comes, and sell if he doesn't come. That simple. They keep pushing back the dates and this is as pathetic as \"<PERSON> CAN STILL WIN: HERE'S HOW!\" \n2. We want the retarded newbies out of WSB so we can have our sub back.", "96" ], [ "> QAnon believes the world is run by a pedophilic death cult. \n > GME holders are in a bid to get paid. \n > Comparing the two is just plain fucking stupid. \n\nThis is the most retarded shit ever LOL. \n\nYou're living in a fucking cult of brainwashing stupid shit. \"3 MORE DAYS UNTIL THE BILLIONAIRE COMES TO BAIL US OUT\" is just \"HERE'S HOW (BERNIE/TRUMP) CAN STILL WIN!!!\" round 3. \n\nThe GOALS of the cult don't matter. The BRAINWASHING is what's identical. The same bullshit promises. \n\nAnd I have watched this \"HOLD THE LINE MEN!!! WE ARE HERE FOR MORE THAN JUST MONEY!!!\" while people are losing their literal life savings destroy entire families as well. \n\nTake your SJW shit back to r/all and get the fuck out of our sub, you fucking loser. \"Ape\" wasn't even a term until you kids came here. Bet if I look into your history, you haven't even been in WSB for 2 weeks and were asking what a short _was_ a week ago. If you look through mine, you'll see I went +500% on GME. \n\nYou're playing the game all wrong and trying to brainwash others into holding bags with you so you don't need to admit defeat, while your money is lining the cash of hedge funds as they laugh their way to the bank. You're shit and everything you've ever done is shit.", "811" ], [ "200k nanos is $700k man. That's a dolphin at best. And I'm not going to just believe the \"I know a guy who knows a guy\" schpiel. \n\nLow volume is not due to suppression. Low volume is because nobody wants to buy OR sell. \n\nIf anyone ACTUALLY RICH saw Nano and thought it had any future, they would drop a few million into it and pump it and 100x their investment in a few weeks. It's oversold and the tech itself can be leveraged to mad gainz with a tiny bit of marketing. \n\nWhales/\"maxis\"/etc are not afraid of the technology. They don't think it'll go anywhere. \n\nIdiots who think that Nano's price is due to manipulation are just as bad as the dumbasses in WSB right now who believe short ladder attacks are totally not just fabricated by Reddit.", "96" ], [ "They covered last Thurs and Fri. It cost them something like $50b. It adds up. SI doesn't have to drop to 0%. Just drop away from margin call territory. \n\nThurs/Fri, price was around $150ish due to RH restrictions and shit. Very possible. \n\nThen they reload on shares at $350 and it craters down to $50. \n\nYou don't believe because you want confirmation bias that you aren't holding heavy fucking bags. GME play is dead. Open your eyes, cultist.", "928" ], [ "WSB OG's have hundreds of thousands to throw at memes, but they've all cashed out because the GME play is over. Squeeze was last week. We took our profits and moved on. \n\nWSB newbies all have 1-2 shares they bought at $350. They aren't meaningfully moving the price. They're committing to a \"war\" against HF's because they're _poor_. Poor people don't move the ticker. \n\nHF's also helped us push last week. They made a killing.", "96" ], [ "> Gambling your retirement in a tax deferred account on a meme stock...you sir, have weaponized retardation.\n\nDid the same. Turned $17.5k into $120k in a 401k with GME. \n\nNow, my total 401k is around $200k and I'm only 30, so time to fuck off with it, throw it into S & P for the next 50 years since I'll never retire and then it'll be worth like 10 million while I do other bullshit. \n\nRetirement: check \nYOLO FDs: incoming", "258" ], [ "> I wish you would stop calling people's thoughts \"retarded conspiracy theories\", which is nothing more than a weak ass empty ad hominen low-blow.\n\nThey are retarded conspiracy theories. Boo hoo that it's their thoughts. People think up retarded conspiracy theories. You're at the root of it. This sub never had anybody even saying the word \"maxi\" before you joined and turned it into a culty cesspool. \n\n > Engage those arguments with sound counter-arguments instead of just deying their claim and calling it stupid. That's what 2yo do. \n\nThere is no arguing with the deluded. Trust me. I argued you into submission when you first showed up like 1-2 years ago and it never shut you up. \n\nSo I just call a spade a spade. Anyone who says \"maxi\" or \"whale suppression\" is a delusional conspiracy theorist.", "969" ], [ "> Do you ever feel that it's a house of cards, only a few bad events away from a pretty big collapse?\n\nNo. Crypto is here to stay, and right now BTC is still the face of crypto. It will flag and go horizontal and get passed by another crypto eventually, for the reasons you mentioned, and then slowly move down to obscurity over a long time, but it won't just collapse and everyone will collectively go \"huh I guess this crypto thing didn't work\" or just collapse as everyone wakes up to go \"Oh wait... BTC is slow as fuck!\" \n\nBTC did collapse from its ATH for multiple years. As low as 15% of its ATH. Several times. And it just comes back bigger and badder.", "1008" ], [ "> Whether you exchange your nano for goods or for fiat you are still “selling” Nano.\n\nNano is a currency. Like FIAT. \n\nIf you use Nano to purchase a house, you did not \"sell\" your Nano to the previous homeowner any more than if you used FIAT to purchase a house did you \"sell\" your USD to obtain the house. \n\nYou don't sell currencies unless you are using them to purchase other currencies (also known as *trading* currencies). You *spend* currencies. \n\nI understand the rather juvenile point that you're making, but there's no reason to try to bring the language with you on the ride.", "170" ], [ "To be fair, selling BTC at $1,400 if you bought in at $7 would be very smart. You already 200x'ed and would barely 10x beyond that with a huge risk. If you put even $10k in, you could pull $2mil out. \n\nGoing from $0 to $2mil is FAR more than going from $2mil to $30mil. At some point, they just become zeroes. \n\nIf Nano ever reached $200, IF, that would imply that BTC/Crypto in general is rocking ever-increasing numbers. If BTC on that day is $200k, you would want to hold out for Nano to reach $20k. You'd be chasing the dragon and never selling. \n\nNano alone will not take a $10k investment and make you a billionaire. You need to have an exit strategy planned. \n\nNo matter how good the dream is, if someone breaks the protocol out of nowhere then this coin will die. It can happen. Advances in technology happen. Advances in hacking technology happen. \n\nNot FUD. Just a realistic perspective. ANY COIN, NO MATTER HOW GOOD IT IS, may theoretically be broken someday by advancements in technology. If that happens, the coin will go to zero and quick. \n\nIf that happens to ANY major coin, the trust in ALL major coins will be fundamentally shaken for years and another bear market will ensue. \n\nThat's part of what makes it so volatile. You shouldn't be treating this as a \"I will hold forever and nothing else\" strategy. If your personal Nano stack ever gets high enough that it becomes lifechanging money for you, I recommend that you **immediately** withdraw **at least half** and change your life. \n\nYou can let the rest ride to $0 or $moon, and that's fine. But for the love of God, don't just sit on it forever.", "1008" ], [ "What I mean is that, if you truly believe Nano is going to $400 or even sizable fraction of that ($100), then $1.40 is not too late. \n\nEven $14 is not too late. \n\nIn traditional investing, pulling a 7% increase after a year is considered some GOOD SHIT. this is a like 7000% just to reach $100 here. There's still plenty of time to buy more and turn cash into bricks. Worrying about buying at $0.70, $1.40, or $10 is just splitting hairs. \n\nIF you honestly expect it to go anywhere near that high, that is.", "928" ], [ "Also, almost nobody here owns a meaningful amount of Nano. \n\nAccording to the top list, only about 1k people own more than 10k Nano. At last week's prices, that means that only about 1k people put in at least $7k into Nano. \n\nFor all these people with, like, 200 Nano... what the fuck? \n\nI mean, seriously, what the fuck? If you're somebody who only has like 200 Nano, even if the coin goes to legit $60 (~double the ATH, which would be an INCREDIBLE run), that's *only* $12k. \n\nI'm not gonna talk shit that someone turned $140 into $12k. But for people to be talking about LAMBOS AND MOONS, they need to have put in more than $200. \n\nLet's be real about something: even if you put $10k into Nano right now (you'd be around top 1k holders) and held it until it went to 6x ATH ($200), you'd *only* have $2mil. That's a lot of fucking money off of a $10k investment, to be sure, but **not lambo money**. \n\nAlmost nobody in this sub, despite their \"hands of diamonds\" for holding Nano through the hard times, is going to be making FU money no matter how high realistically Nano goes. Nano could break $3k (current BTC market cap) and a person who only has 200 would not even be able to *afford* a lambo.", "1008" ], [ "> You think people on the top list has only 1 address? lol.\n\nYou can reach top 1k with only like 10k Nano. Around $10k invested. \n\nIf you're paranoid enough to take your ~$10k investment and split it up among multiple wallets, cudos. \n\nOn the contrary, the top list has all kinds of garbage like Kucoin wallet, binance wallets, cold wallets, etc. The top ~30 are almost exclusively exchange wallets and shit like the developer fund. And I wouldn't be surprised if people in the top 1k each owned multiple addresses within the top 1k. Point is that the top 1k is really probably closer to 300ish unique people, and not the other way around. \n\n > Never have to work again. Never have to deal with bills, traffic, asshole bosses, etc. \n\nI think of FU money like you buy a lambo without a second thought. With $2mil, I couldn't even afford a nice lakeside Tahoe house that I'd like to serve as my primary long-term \"safe\" investment vehicle. \n\n$30mil. That's FU money. You can buy an expensive, safe, long-term house. You can buy a lambo if you want. You can do whatever you want. Your kids are set for school. You never have to work a day again in your life. \n\nAt $2mil? After cap gains taxes and shit, $1.6mil? You can grab a decent $400k home and put the other $1.2mil into the stock market and pull $80k per year annually from it. If you budget well and live a frugal lifestyle, you can save off of that enough to put one child through a decent college. Maybe two. But you aren't taking yearly luxurious vacations or anything. You aren't staying in 5-star hotels. \n\nOf course, in other countries, this might be different. And to some, simply being able to tell your boss \"FU\" is the definition of FU money. It's a YMMV thing. \n\nBut again, that assumes you put $10k into Nano and it goes up to $200. Two very big asks.", "482" ], [ "> People with only $200 in NANO only have that because that's all they can afford to lose.\n\nDoesn't change the fact that it isn't going to lead to meaningful gains. \n\n > If they can only afford to gamble $200, making $12k is substantial for them. Maybe not for you. \n\nFirst: irrelevant. \n\nSecond: let me give you a tip. If you can **only afford** to gamble $200, **you can't afford to gamble**. \n\n > \"Lambos\" is just a meme, I bet a tinnnny number of us are actually going to buy a lambo. \n\nA meme that *symbolizes* being so \"FU rich\" that you can just do whatever you want. People who drop $112 into Nano praying to someday turn it into $700 so that they can pay off overdue credit card bills aren't experiencing even a personal \"LAMBO\" moment. And it's shitty to even suggest that that's a responsible tactic. \n\nTake your garbage social justice elsewhere. How poor someone is is irrelevant to my point. If you can only afford to lose $140, I suggest you take a safer investment vehicle than *any* cryptocurrency. This is just a lottery ticket for those people. An expensive, high-risk, low-payout lottery ticket. \n\nMy point is that a $200 investment will not give you the levels of money that people are talking about when they post this garbage. \n\nThis general \"WE WERE HERE THROUGH THE HARD TIMES BUT WE'RE GONNA GET OUR COME-UPPANCE!!!\" crap is so tonedeaf when you realize that these are people who largely watched $400 investments fall to $140 and will someday see it \"moon\" to $850, meanwhile they're preaching shit like \"don't you dare let them say you were lucky!!!\"", "834" ], [ "> You seem pretty pissed, guess you sold last week?\n\nThe real smoothbrain take. \n\n > What the fuck does this even mean? Maybe you have $200 aside from your other SAFER investments you're willing to put on something extremely speculative like Nano is. If you can afford to gamble $200, you can afford to gamble $200 - pretty simple \n\nIt means that if the difference between spending $200 and $201 is the difference between whether or not you're going to be eating, you have more important things to do with your $200 than to be putting it into volatile ass cryptocurrencies. Obviously. \n\nNobody in this world who only has $200 to spare should be gambling with that $200. Don't encourage addiction. \n\n > The bottom line is money is relative and what's meaningful to someone may not be meaningful to you. Let people be happy and gtfo \n\nHence my entire point about social justice bullshit. Poor people need better financial strategies than \"dabble in crypto.\" \n\nTo anybody who $12k will be a life-changer, they need to take their $200 out of crypto and do something more responsible with it than some insane long-shot. \n\n$12k isn't going to meaningfully do anything other than paying off relatively small debts (credit cards, car payments, that kind of thing). If you have these kinds of debts and paying them off is a meaningful burden to your life, get the fuck out of crypto and come up with a more sound financial strategy. \n\nThere's a difference between \"people being happy\" and \"people fantasizing about their Forbes interviews when they're making triple-digit gains.\"", "834" ], [ "> the price is at $1.5. You think it will go to $1000 and stop there?\n\nIt's gotta stop somewhere. If it goes up from $1.50 to $1500, you could use the same logic. $3500, you could use the same logic. \n\nCashing out on the way up is fine. Stop-losses are fine. Any strategy that is faithfully executed is fine. Winners aren't really winners until you cash out on them. \n\nI agree with you that putting in a trailing stop-loss is a better strategy than just blindly selling at $1k. But selling at $1k -- even a winner -- is better than never selling.", "511" ], [ "> Stop projecting so hard\n\nDunno what this even means. \n\n > Who are you to tell people not to put $200 into something they really believe in? THATS the reason they’re here and THATS why they’re so happy when this coin even sees a remote amount of success \n\nDoing something you \"really believe in\" is not the same as \"gambling\" (your own words LOL). \n\nAnd putting $200 towards something you \"really believe in\" isn't the same as lambo memeing about how you plan to cash out rich. \n\nYou're just moving the goalposts constantly to fit your stupid narrative. Face the facts: anyone who puts in $200 to gamble and then memes about how they're gonna get FU money from that and \"don't you dare let them tell you that you 'got lucky'\" are deluding themselves into thinking that their paltry investment is going to make them a millionaire. \n\n > Who are you to tell people not to put $200 into something they really believe in? \n\nA person with the right to tell people whatever I want to tell them, same as you, moron. They have the right not to listen to me and to instead gamble away their last $200 on cryptocurrency. I can acknowledge and respect their right not to listen to me, but it seems you're the fascist unable to accept my right to tell them the *responsible* thing: that if $200 is a meaningful sum to you, that you shouldn't be dicking around in cryptocurrency gambling. And **sure as fuck** are never going to make lambo money off of a $200 investment.", "834" ], [ "This sub was once basically the WSB equivalent of crypto trading. It had memes and gif wars and it was glorious. \n\nEventually, as the price tanked, almost every post was just about capitulation and anxiety. It stopped being fun to post here, and so many people didn't. I only really responded to modmail at that time. \n\nHere's to hoping the memes come back, if nothing else.", "434" ], [ "I agree with you. What you described is accurate to what we've been saying: selling at $13 on the way down was better than selling at $7 on the way up, but selling at $7 on the way up would still have been better than never selling and watching it fall back to $0.50. \n\nThey're just layers of strategy. HODL is a non-strategy: you just don't perform any action. Selling at a fixed price is a good strategy. You come up with a price estimate when you're rational and you stick to it. Had you sold 1/3 of your stack @ $10, 1/3 at $20, and 1/3 at $30, you would have done better than selling 100% @ $13 -- it can be a very good strategy if you are very good at predicting good prices to sell at. It's like the inverse of a DCA. \n\nMore advanced strategies -- stop-losses, for example -- are even better. And they can be combined (you can set a 10% stop-loss for 1/2 around $10, another stop-loss for 1/4 around $20, another stop-loss for 1/8 around $30, and the end result would've been that 87.5% of your Nano would've sold around $33 and you would've held 12.5% of it all the way down to current prices. \n\nThese are all fine strategies. Some are better than others, and all are even better if you can accurately predict value. \n\nI am only against advising to HODL forever, which I had originally thought you were advocating. I'd rather see someone sell at $1k on the way up and lock in 100000% gains than not to sell at $1k on the way up and just keep holding forever.", "511" ], [ "We're just different people. I am more clinical and logical and you are more emotional. You care about how poor somebody is and want to go out of your way to respect them, and it causes you to project your feelings of strong emotion onto me by imagining I'm getting worked up. \n\nFor me, it's just cold, calculated math. If somebody can't afford to put more than $200, they're factually being irresponsible by investing in crypto and need to stop lambomemeing on Reddit and probably get an extra job to support their lifestyle. \n\nNothing wrong with that. People are different. I don't disrespect you for being more emotionally-driven. I just don't find there to be any value in emotions in a factual discussion, that's all. \n\nBest of luck to you.", "247" ], [ "Long-term or short-term? \n\nIf you want to buy long term, just buy. DCA if you want. It doesn't matter. Not a big difference between buying at $0.70 or $1.40 or $2.10 if you're going to hold for 5 years and are hoping for it to go to $200. \n\nIf you want to buy short-term, wait for a dip. It's rare that you see nonstop green candlesticks. Much more likely to see up-down-up-down movement even in an upward trajectory.", "511" ], [ "Yeah lol. The idea that people who are holding 100 Nano for 3 years through a bear market are somehow really strong amused me. \n\nI found out yesterday that I had ~61 Nano left over on a KuCoin wallet that I didn't even know about. Oops. I had hands of diamonds for the last few years, too! \n\nIt's a joke because 61 Nano is nothing, but some people legitimately have comments like \"Should I round off my stack of 100, or wait for a dip?\" Like bro come on", "928" ], [ "> I'm suspecting that this is a ban evasion sub for the many white supremacists hate subs that got banned recently.\n\nBut this sub is like 3+ years old? \n\nAnd all the commenters were like \"yeah go for it\"? \n\nAnd this sub is generally pretty anti-Trump? \n\n > It's obviously just an excuse to say racist shit about Jews. \n\nWhat? ROFL \n\n > Changing the words in a sentence is the definition of whataboutism \n\nBut it isn't even whataboutism. \n\n > Plus the subs name doesn't even make sense as a joke it's just the world's loudest dogwhistle. \n\nWhat the fuck does this even mean? It's a pun. It doesn't need to make sense. \n\n > So y'all reek of fascism. \n\nWhat \n\n > True fascists think <PERSON> is a Jewish shill, neofascists larpers love <PERSON>. So y'all just showed your power level. \n\nROFL What the fuck kind of delusional shit is this? None of what you said is even remotely related to the sub. \n\nThe sub is a sub about discrimination against whites/men from racist/misandrist individuals. None of what you said is even.. remotely related to this sub.", "272" ], [ "> Criticizing men, especially straight white men, who have traditionally always held power over other groups of people, is not the same as perpetuating racist stereotypes and propoganda that were an instrumental part of a genocide.\n\nYeah. Being a racist isn't the same as being a racist. Because \"institutional power\" arguments that are are how racism was redefined by college kids like 5 years ago. \n\nWhatever you need to tell yourself in order to sleep at night knowing that you are embracing the narrative that \"all white men are evil.\" \n\nMinorities have never committed genocide. Nope. Whites have never been victims of genocide. Nope. \n\nIn 20 years -- probably less -- you'll look back on some of this embarrassing racist shit you posted and cringe.", "715" ], [ "Since nobody responded to you, I will clarify: \n\nYes, maybe 0.01% of people wouldn't have understood that it was a joke. However, it kills the joke for FAR more than that. \n\nImagine your buddy tells you a joke. But, before you get the chance to even fully process it and laugh, he continues his story and goes \"Get it? The joke was < explains the joke > ! That's why it's funny!\" It would immediately kill any amount of comedy potential that the joke ever had, immediately turning it into a patronizing moment of \"Yes. I'm not a moron. I understood your joke.\" \n\nEven if you didn't understand his joke, the fact that he had to stop and *explain* the joke to you (or that it *was* a joke) means that the joke would not have landed anyway. \n\nA joke isn't going to land for 100% of people, and that's okay. If 0.01% of people are going to woooosh the joke, that's fine. Better that than to alienate all of the people who GOT the joke by pointing out to them \"HEY, IDIOT, IT WAS A JOKE!\" \n\nFor people who knew this was a joke, the \"/s\" was at best meaningless and at worst a joke-killer. For people who didn't know it was a joke (i.e., people who don't know english very well perhaps, or don't know that SpaceX is the name of a company and not the name of a famous scientist... somehow), seeing \"/s\" doesn't really help them understand *why* it was a joke or *why* it was funny. \n\nImagine if he just said \"Like brussel sprouts. /s\" -- that joke makes no sense. You wouldn't get the joke. You wouldn't think it's funny. You'd know it was a joke, at least, due to \"/s,\" but you wouldn't get WHY it's funny or even really UNDERSTAND the joke. \n\nEither a joke lands or it doesn't. Part of telling a joke well is wording it in such a way that maximum people will understand it. If you tack on \"/s\" or \"By the way, it was a joke!\" or \"The joke was < explanation > \" or anything else, you just come across as patronizing for literally no upside. \n\nThe rare instances where /s is useful *generally* aren't found on Reddit, since subreddits tend to be such echochambers that finding someone who would genuinely say something that someone else would mockingly say *on the same sub* is incredibly rare.", "339" ], [ "He already betrayed the straw hats multiple times, as far as I'm concerned. \n\nIn Alabasta, he almost lost his fight vs <PERSON> due to the <PERSON> bullshit. This happened while he was literally stating how <PERSON> was relying on him to win that fight in order to save her country. So, at the very least, he betrayed <PERSON> over *looks*. \n\nEnnies Lobby was straight betrayal. Straight betrayal. There's no excuse. He knew what they did to <PERSON>. He knew what was going to happen if he let <PERSON> go. He let her wipe the floor with him because of his code. \n\nInb4 Sanji fanboys tell me that it's honorable or whatever: he isn't. He isn't a gentleman. He's a pervert whenever the opportunity arises. His nosebleed shit in FI was pathetic, and what he did while in <PERSON>'s body during PH was literally just sexual assault. He's not a \"gentleman\" with a \"code of conduct.\" I get that his perversion shit is usually just played for laughs, but not in the same character who *betrays the fucking crew* over his \"chivalry.\" \n\nLet's not forget that <PERSON>, almost the first thing he said to <PERSON> when he joined the crew, told <PERSON> that <PERSON> would need to \"answer to him\" if <PERSON>'s goals EVER get in the way of <PERSON>'s ambition. <PERSON> told <PERSON> *day fucking one* that being the world's greatest swordsman was his priority, even OVER being a loyal crewmate. \n\nAnd then? Not even halfway into the series, he threw his life down telling <PERSON> to kill him in order to spare <PERSON>. He **abandoned** his initial stance, believing himself to be forsaking his dream (and <PERSON>'s inherited will), to try to secure <PERSON>'s dream. \n\n<PERSON> is just a trash character. My least favorite SH, by far. I actually think he's just a rapist piece of trash tbh.", "475" ], [ "> But it's definitely the lesser of two evils\n\nThis is such a tired excuse. There are not only two options. \n\nSidegrades exist. Map mechanics that won't be abandoned exist. Simply not having new masteries exists. \n\nMasteries were supposed to be a form of **character progression**. That's why the number shows up *instead* of our level when we get more of them. If you dislike character progression at a fundamental level, scrap the mastery system and say level 80 is the cap, period, no power creep, nothing. \n\nAnd let's be real: masteries have power crept this game less than elite specializations ever have or ever will. Anet has no problem with power creep. They have a problem coming up with new and engaging masteries. \n\nI would just rather no new masteries *ever* and have that be that.", "163" ], [ "If you played HoT when it was current, HoT masteries felt amazing. It was back when masteries took a lot of work to obtain, because mastery points weren't handed out like candy and the experience to obtain them wasn't trivial. \n\nThe end result was that the game felt almost like a Metroidvania. You could take it at your own pace -- either following along the rails in the open paths, or taking shortcuts (jumping shrooms, wallows, poison areas, etc.) depending on which masteries you had opted for. \n\nIt not only felt like power gain but also meaningful choices and character customization. I remember having times where my friends couldn't take bouncing mushrooms with me and so I had to mesmer-port them up, but I couldn't take poison fields with them and so we had to go to a different Dragon Stand lane together. \n\nThey did not have to abandon the HoT masteries after HoT was over. They could have put some Nuhoch into Elon Riverlands -- either as a long-forgotten tribe who were surprised (\"What?! You can use our wallows, too, foreigner?!\") or as a part of our campaign (our new Nuhoch allies traveled with us and constructed some wallows to help us out). There could have been poison. There could have been bouncing mushrooms. \n\nThe common argument is \"But then people would have to spend *at least some* time in HoT before they could do all of PoF!\" to which I say: so what? You currently have to spend A LOT of time in core Tyria before you can do PoF, unless you use a level 80 character boost. If it's really that big of a deal, pack the base masteries into the level 80 character boost if it's the first one you ever use. Or make it a gemstore item to just buy masteries. The game is already fairly p2w and has no problem introducing power/utility creep in gemstore items (WP unlocks, lv80 boosts, BiS Fashion, OP shit like Consortium Scythe & Volatile Magic tools), so would being able to just BUY MASTERIES really be an exception? \n\nI'd be totally fine with <PERSON> being allowed to be max mastery by using his IRL Legendary Weapon if it meant that the trade-off is that masteries stayed useful forever. \n\nNot that I expect a convoluted bouncing mushroom maze in EVERY map, but a few old ones here or there would've been great. I think Dragonfall might be the best designed map in the entire game.", "656" ], [ "> I guess powercreep just sells better or something.\n\nThis isn't even true, because the ONE area of the game that (imo) SHOULD have level creep (masteries) DOESN'T. \n\nMasteries are **post-80 progression**. If anywhere in the entire game should allow our characters to be permanently more powerful -- and I said IF -- then it should be masteries. You gain power by leveling up. Masteries are our post-level-level. Surely it would make sense if they continued to make us gain power. \n\nAnd yet, they add garbage like the above. \"You get more for doing the content that you could have gotten baseline.\" Just don't introduce new masteries then!", "163" ], [ "The problem (in this case) isn't that WvW gives shit for loot. It's that WvW is too biased against new people in terms of loot. Why the fuck would someone at rank 10k get 3x the skirmish pips (on avg) compared to someone who is rank 1? Someone who is rank 10k doesn't need the additional incentive. They probably already play WvW for 80 hours a week for fun. \n\nA brand new WvW player is going to be mighty discouraged from doing WvW knowing it will take them 40+ hours of it to get a diamond chest, and 30-300+ hours of it to get to rank 150 and get their *first* additional rank pip.", "435" ], [ "Downed sigil lifesteal is the best of the entire track. Anyone who doesn't like it either doesn't do open world PvE content or doesn't understand how rallying works. You get downed? You can immediately do a max-range 5 to GREATLY increase the odds you get a rally from the AoE damage. If that works, you can usually use `2` (depending on class) to buy more time for `3` to come off CD, which is usually VERY helpful in rallying against a single-target. \n\nAnd the sigil's passive effect (lifesteal) is good too. And works literally almost everywhere. Even fractals. It's great.", "675" ], [ "You're overfocusing on one small part of my post. Notice I said stuff like *this* specifically so that you wouldn't throw a tantrum: \n\n > -- and I said IF -- \n\nWe've power crept more through elite specs and random rebalances than we EVER have through masteries.. Except maybe mounts. Mounts are a MASSIVE power/utility/wealth/everything increase. But even there, elite specs overshadow them. Fractal God is more power creep in fractals than Fractal Masteries were -- how does that even make sense? \n\nIF, and once again I'll repeat this to minimize your trigger sensitivities, **IF** they were to have ANY power creep in the game, it should be via masteries. \n\nI'd prefer zero. But if I MUST have some, it should be masteries. Masteries are post-80 content. \n\nI would rather have power creeping masteries with non-power-creeping balance & specs and no Fractal God than to have stuff like Fractal God and so much other power creep elsewhere but then have masteries that are garbage like the above.", "656" ], [ "That's just, like, your opinion, man. \n\nJust because something creates a solution to a new problem doesn't mean I'm going to hate it, as long as that problem is always relevant after first being presented. \n\nGliding is also the solution to an artificial problem. They could've kept making maps flatter like in core Tyria or just give us the ability to glide without being behind a mastery track. \n\nIt's a video game. **Everything** is an artificial problem. \n\nI understand what you mean about gliding feeling more like a natural solution. I understand that you're saying that you can go back to central Tyria and glide and it's useful, VS bouncing mushrooms which are irrelevant in core Tyria. I get it. \n\nBut when doing the HoT content, I enjoyed the metroidvania feel to the whole thing. It turned Tangled Depths from a confusing maze to a relatively convenient network. There's a near-instant way to get to almost any area of the map with Nuhoch Wallows. \n\nI agree with your list that those are the **best** masteries, but I would not say that bouncing mushrooms (at the time) were a **bad** mastery. If they just kept including mushrooms into all future expansions, it would have been fine. Not everything can be as *fundamentally game-changing* as a mount. \n\nWhat you listed as \"special mention\" is now \"main plate and dinner.\" Look at the masteries listed at the top of this thread: HoT ones weren't as good as mounts, but they sure as hell were better than that garbage.", "656" ], [ "> Shit like adrenal mushrooms\n\nAdrenal mushrooms were very VERY good when they were included. There's a champion in the western cave in Draconis Mons where there are like 5 adrenal mushrooms in his chamber. Upon first encountering him, I soloed him (Chronomancer) by using [CT + all my shit + all my shit a 2nd time + Adrenal] * (repeat 5x). \n\nTo be fair, you're right, I NEVER kill the champ frogs in VB/TD. Mining stuff in AB I do every day, but I'm bleeding them out my ears so you're right. Riding on leylines? I do it even now, in Dragonfall, during the meta. \n\nBut, as c0ld_0ne stated, **this was my point**. Outside of a VERY select few HoT masteries (mining auric slivers in AB, fighting champ bosses, etc), any of the other mechanics COULD HAVE BEEN more used. \n\nAdrenal mushrooms? Useful everywhere **they're placed**. Poison master? Useful everywhere **that poison is placed**. Ley line gliding? Useful everywhere **that ley lines are placed**. \n\nMOST of the masteries themselves would be fine if the developers would just PLACE the mechanics into the maps.", "656" ], [ "> And even if i wanted to, the maps are almost dead and there's no way i can solo those GOD TIER mobs with my 13k hp daredevil lol.\n\nIt's really unfortunate to hear that there's such a high barrier to entry to these maps (imo some of my favorite maps/metas) due to difficulty, exclusive masteries, and general perception. \n\nThe maps (*almost* every map, excluding mainly VB) are very lively if you know the right times/places, and there are some decent ways to make a quick buck (the ~1m Matriarch kill, for example) if you do the metas. \n\nDoing their metas also give you a lot of \"worthless\" ascended crafting materials (e.g., Ley Line Sparks), which can be combined together into Jeweled Damask Patches as a way to translate Obsidian Shards into roughly 33s/ea. And if you do any amount of LS4 karma farming with Karmic Retribution (e.g., Specimen Chamber pre-event), OR a lot of Winterberry farming in LS3, OR park a bunch of alt/lv1 characters at the end of the Draconis Mons JP, you can end up with literally thousands of Obsidian Shards to use. \n\nAB/TD get massive event trains when they are the Shiny Bauble weeks -- north of 30+g/h last I checked. AB gets a lot of action during the meta event (every odd hour on the hour). TD gets a lot of action during its meta event (every even hour :30). \n\nIf you're interested in easing into some HoT maps, here is a meta train that takes you through all the *main* HoT metas, starting at the daily reset time: \n\n > XX:00 - Teq \n > XX:15 - join a Casino Blitz (get a round3 one, because...) \n > XX:20 - rush to Timberline Falls for the ley-line anomaly \n > XX:30 - TD meta/TM \n > XX:45 - Thunderhead South (Ice Floes) meta \n > YY:00 - AB meta/TM \n > YY:10 - Maw in the Desolation \n > YY:20 - Death-branded Shatterer \n > YY:30 - Junundu Rising (if you couldn't get Maw) OR check Sandswept for spec chamber pre-event OR check dragonfall for post-meta OR check Kourna for Plague Experiments OR Winterberries OR Paggas OR quick dailies OR break \n > YY:45 - Thunderhead Northern meta \n > XX:00 - Doppelganger \n > XX:05 - Vabbi Forged \n > XX:10 - TD Matriarch \n > XX:20 - Iron Marches Ley Line (IF you missed the one at last XX:20 in Timberline) \n\nAnd in doing so, you cover every single (excluding Dragon's Stand) Amalgamated Gemstone meta in just over 2 hours. And 3 of those are HoT metas. The TD one, <PERSON>, will take 15 minutes in total, and it's possible to tag the Gerent in every lane and get another ~4ish events (Chak rushing cannon @ 1:00 remaining + lane event; <PERSON> rushing cannon @ 1:30 remaining + lane event #2) [8 events total including the 4 gerents] if you know what you're doing, resulting in 15+ extra Shiny Baubles during bauble weeks & obtaining 12-60+ crystallized supply caches in the process.", "910" ], [ "> The biggest mistake anet made with HoT masteries is not including it for free in PoF.\n\nAgreed. Huge misstep. Though, they still could have included them. A bouncing mushroom is *usually* not meaningfully better than a bunny jump. A Nuhoch Wallow is fundamentally identical to a Jackal Portal. They could've provided more ways to reach the same content. \n\nGating a PoF Mastery Point behind a Nuhoch Wallow? OK, not cool. Gating a PoF Mastery Point behind a (Nuhoch Wallow | Jackal Portal)? That's acceptable. Non-HoT could still get it - they just have to work harder. And maybe seeing other players using jumping shrooms and stuff would encourage them to purchase HoT, or motivate them to go give HoT a try. \n\nNowadays, many people own HoT but don't have the HoT masteries because.. why bother? Why bother going back to old maps that are difficult in order to grind out *four fucking million EXP* so that you can walk through poison, which has literally never been seen again since HoT? There's just no reason.", "538" ], [ "A big part of the problem is that the game isn't very consistent, too. I would consider myself a \"GOD TIER GAMER\" in most circles. I've led raids in WoW at a top-10 world level and have played in challenger-style brackets in FPSes in the past. \n\nAnd yet, I am never too certain whether dodging will actually work or not. Usually it does, but I often have to second-guess myself because some mechanics go through dodges. \n\nThe boss jumps and then crashes down. I can probably jump over this, right? Usually, yeah. But not always. And since 90% = still death 10%, I'd rather just dodgeroll through ALL shockwaves than take the risk and look like a noob who \"tried to jump over the ring LOL\" \n\nWvW? Hahaha forget about it. I suck at that mode. I might be a multiglad on WoW and have tons and tons of PvP experience and even commanding experience of over 200 people in EVE, but figuring out what to do in WvW? I can't even see enemy abilities targeting the ground to know what they do! They're all just red outline circles without any visual indicator! What happens when I step in? Is it just a bullshit well that'll deal a small amount of damage, or is it going to destroy me? \n\nThey also bait & switch. Teach players how to breakbar and then you'll find them destroying the Gerent breakbar and Mordremoth breakbar and shit when we don't want them to. I see IBS tables at Gerent almost every day LOL for the people who REALLY want the purple donuts to 1-shot us as fast as possible. \n\nYes. Ignorant players are part of the problem (and they are ultimately <PERSON>'s fault, too), but even more of the problem is the inconsistent design. Inconsistencies between what spells work underwater VS what ones don't. \n\nAnd maybe it's just because I am an idiot, but I don't know any of my spells' names. I main a mesmer. Have since 2014. I don't know the name of Greatsword 4. I use a GS daily. I can tell you what it does. But I have no idea what it's called. \n\nThe community seems to assume that, too. Nobody calls it by its name. They all call it GS4. \n\nWhy does this matter, beyond semantics? \n\nIn WoW, I can tell you exactly how much AP the Warrior ability Battle Shout gives. If I read some patch notes that say \"Battle Shout buffed by 10%\" I will know exactly what that means. \n\nIf I read some patch notes that say \"Phantasmal Fighter damage buffed by 10%\" I am going to do a triple-take -- \"uh sorry which phantasm is that...?\" \n\nSo it's very difficult for me to stay current with this game, despite my high-end experience and ample gamesense. It's very difficult for me to memorize the secondary effects of my abilities in this game, again despite my high-end experience and gamesense. \n\nOn WoW, I can list off every single buff and debuff that every single class can provide. I can tell you about their damage, whether or not it's part of their main rotation, and even the spell coefficient on the spell with few exceptions. I will know what a buff or debuff is just by its icon, effect, or sound, and I will understand what it means. \n\nIn GW? Despite having around 1/20 of the total buffs and debuffs that WoW has, I can't tell anything at a glance. Boons and conditions share ONE LINE, and ALL boons are yellow while ALL conditions are red. WHY?! Why isn't RESISTANCE a GREEN icon? Let me quickly tell what people have AT A GLANCE! \n\nWhat I am saying is, fundamentally, that this game is **unintuitive**. It isn't impossible to learn, but if an EXTREMELY high-end player can't just figure it out without putting in ample work, then what hope is there for a casual, even with a tutorial system?", "656" ], [ "> i sincerely hope you perish so humanity's average empathy level can increase \n\n<PERSON> \n\n > Thanks for proving my point, now perish at once \n\n\\+ \n\n > humanity's average empathy level can increase \n\nrofl \n\nAlso, can you even read? \n\n > I work from home and never have any contact with others. \n\nLegit haven't left my apartment in 3+ months. \n\nAlso, do you think I'm not aware of herd immunity or something? \n\n > I feel very strongly pro-vaccine. \n\nAnd if I _did_ get COVID by some astronomically low chance, do you think I would just suddenly break my self-quarantine to go hang out with high-risk individuals? \n\nIt's too bad your brain isn't as active as your fingers.", "168" ], [ "I majored in biochemical engineering. I am not some uneducated hick out in the woods that you're going to impress by telling them about mRNA vaccines. \n\n > mRNA vaccines in humans on this scale is new but they've been used in animals and in small trials with humans and show no indication of unexpected long term issues. \n\nIt's difficultto show long-term issues with a lack of long-term testing. \n\n > The vaccine wasn't rushed \n\nIt came out in under a year. It was rushed. I can do the math. A vaccine with even a 5-10% nonlethal complication rate is better for the economy than a disease that cripples people into fear who won't go out and do their jobs. \n\n > the studies they cut in the FDA trials have nothing to do with safety and revolve around secondary things that are important to know but don't impact the public's 2 biggest questions 1) does it work and 2) is it safe. \n\nWhich is why we cut those studies all the time, right? \n\n > The fact is I know someone younger than you who died of COVID, that percentage seems so low until you roll the dice wrong. \n\nAnd? I know someone younger than me who won the lottery. It's still Stupid Tax. I'll go based on probabilities and not based on worst case scenario. Risk is impact X likelihood -- high impact does not equal high risk, since the likelihood is trivial. \n\n > Not to mention secondary effects and the large amount of young people suffering heart attacks and strokes secondary to COVID \n\nLarge amounts != large percentages. COVID is a toothless disease against healthy people in their prime _in general_. Yeah, there are exceptions. I am not one of them. I am extremely healthy and never interact with anybody. The risk I catch it is nigh-0%. The risk it deals any damage to me is nigh-0%. The risk that I transmit it is nigh-0%. The risk of me taking the vaccine is likely nigh-0%. However, I'd prefer a `nigh-0% ^ 3` risk over a `nigh-0%` risk. \n\nIf you believe otherwise, you have been brainwashed by the media and are too emotionally invested due to the unfortunate loss of your friend. \n\n > building up the herd immunity is an obligation I have to my community. \n\nI don't have such an obligation, for one. For two, I don't interact with my community. \n\nThis thread is enlightening. I am starting to see, for the first time in my life, why anti-vaxxers find pro-vaccine people so irritating. I am _extremely_ pro-vaccine, but when you ignore stuff like this: \n\n > I work from home and never have any contact with others. \n\nto post anecdotal crap like this: \n\n > I know someone younger than you who died of COVID \n\nand combine it with all of the irrelevant-but-self-righteous rants from people about herd immunity... Indeed, I can see why anti-vaxxers feel so passionately now. \n\nI won't be changing my stance due to somebody on the internet _in either direction_ with such weak arguments, unfortunately for you, but at least you've helped me gain empathy for anti-vaxxers. I thank you.", "929" ], [ "> no government regulation? \n\nFirst of all, libertarianism isn't anarchy. \n\nThere are two major ways: \n\n1. Monetarily penalize people who hire overseas workers, e.g. high tariffs. \n\n This is not much regulation for the individual _and_ the moment you start working cross-country the Government has every right to start getting their grubby hands in the pot. Defining borders and how people interact with them is basically **most of the purpose** of government IMO. \n\n2. Monetarily support companies that do not hire overseas workers. \n\n I'm not saying \"give them free taxpayer dollars.\" I am saying that if you need to choose between certain companies to subsidize based on a subsidy that was going to need to happen anyway for Government reasons, to always pick one that has no international workers. For example, if the government is planning to spend $100 billion for national defense this year and wants to purchase jets, and their two choices are between Jet Company A that has overseas workers and Jet Company B that does not, they _must_ pick Jet Company B. \n\n This big contract would be a large monetary loss for Jet Company A, which means that they would then reconsider whether or not the cash influx from the overseas workers outweighs the monetary benefits of being able to get the lucrative government contracts. \n\nAnother idea is to give tax breaks to companies that have ONLY in-country labor. For example, the marginal tax rate of a company that has only in-country labor might be 30% (let's say, hypothetically), but the marginal tax rate of a company that has cross-country labor might be 40%. \n\nFor small businesses, they likely wouldn't be making SO MUCH cash that they even have that high of a marginal tax rate, so even if they hire internationally (unlikely) they wouldn't be penalized that much. And since they don't make very much money, the difference in tax rate is a very small _raw amount_. And raw amounts matter, because salaries are always a very small _percentage_ of profits for bigger businesses anyway. \n\nFor bigger companies, e.g. ones that have annual profits of $20 billion, being slapped with a 10% higher marginal tax rate means paying upwards of $2 billion. At that point, it is likely cheaper to just go hire 20000 Americans at $50k/year ($1 billion) than it is to pay the taxes ($2 billion). \n\nAre these the only solutions? No. Are these exhaustive solutions? No. Are these perfect solutions? No. Are they a hell of a lot better than trusting that a big beaurocratic government won't fuck our asses? Yeah. And they took like 30 seconds to bring up.", "23" ], [ "> our libright Congress\n\nHahahahahaha you think Congress is libright ahahahaha \n\nThey are whatever political ideology they need to be to argue at that moment. \n\nThe fact is, they are bribed by <PERSON> to just let them do whatever they want. If congress could somehow twist this around to \"we must let <PERSON> keep doing it for the good of the (economy | gays | national security | race of white people | race of black people | etc) they will make that argument. They will argue any political quadrant if it means that they can defend their _sponsors_. \n\nAnd corruption/greed is hardly a LibRight motive.", "604" ], [ "The problem is that most people look at that situation and then go \"We MUST enforce laws to outlaw bad ethics!!!\" \n\nWhy not just enforce some laws to make bad ethics unprofitable? People can still choose to be unethical (personal freedom) but it will cost them extra money. Companies want to make money. Ergo, companies will then do the ethical thing just because it is also the profitable thing. \n\nIt's such a simple concept that blows peoples' minds.", "23" ], [ "Knock that off, bro, you're going to blow this guy's mind. \n\nBut yes, obviously that is what would happen. Many would argue that \"well, then hiring an American is a good thing!!!\" and I'd agree. I'd rather see companies have financial incentives to hire Americans, because that helps stimulate our economy. Why would I want them to go stimulate Africa's economy? So that the money can go to some local warlord, or fund their anti-white genocide? No thanks. \n\nIf Nestle and other companies were _fiscally encouraged_ to come back here with more jobs, then that means more working Americans who can spend more cash on other American businesses, which allows ALL OF US to make more companies and offer better services and grow AS A NATION. \n\nAllowing your nation's companies to maximize profits overseas is so fucking foolish. Big companies CAN offer a great service to a nation (tons of jobs - > better cashflow - > more consumers for the _entire economy_ and more tax revenue), but the moment you make it fiscally smarter for them to hire overseas workers, you are shitting your pants. \n\nBut onto your point: yes, if somebody cares about Africans, they would definitely NOT advocate to give Africans a real wage. That would just fuck them over LOL", "113" ], [ "> Yeah people act like it's this unimaginable society\n\nBecause it is. Look at who you are responding to: \n\n > there would be no money, so no incentive to engage in capitalism \n\nThis works great, until someone invents money. Then what happens? People would start using it (like they did in history) and eventually it would convert to capitalism. And the only way you're going to stop this (short of taking actions on the individual level, like murdering the infidel with your bare hands) is by having a government big enough to outlaw capitalism. And that's not <PERSON> anymore. \n\n > People would still be incentivized to work like always they'd just be working for themselves and their neighbors rather than some faceless corporation run by cocaine addicted yacht enthusiasts. \n\nRight now I make around $400k/year doing a very specialized information security job. Yes, I am making some rich billionaire a _richer_ billionaire, but I am also working on millions myself. If I were working on a commune, I would be doing about as well as the dipshit who fucked about during school, had kids at 19, and is now attempting to \"Make It\" as a Twitch streamer playing Dark Souls in between his 3 different part-time jobs doing awful backbreaking labor. \n\nI _deserve_ more than him. I made better decisions than he did. I worked harder than he did so that nowadays I can work less than he does.", "101" ], [ "Or just genuine incentives to do good things. \n\nWant a company to be _green_ for the good of the nation? Then why the fuck is it so expensive? Subsidize the companies that do the research into Green Stuff so that they start mass-producing that shit faster and thus more cheaply. Other companies will buy the Green Shit if it's actually cheaper (cuz saving money) meanwhile the company that makes the Green Shit is happy because they got a kick-start by the government. But make these subsidies loans -- they aren't a free taxpayer-fueled cash injection. They are just low interest loans that must be paid back, and capitalists also LOVE low-interest loans. \n\nThere are so many ways to fix problems like this without needing to resort to laws. Just make it genuinely more profitable (through fiscal penalties or fiscal rewards) to do the Right Thing. \n\nAnd if someone _still_ doesn't want to do the Right Thing, they can choose not to. That's freedom. The best part about it is that if the government starts doing something you vehemently disagree with, you can put your money where your mouth is and go against them even if it'll cost you a buck.", "786" ], [ "Yeah. \n\nI know this isn't the popular opinion among the bleeding heart Reddit crowd, but yes. \n\nIf NK had the vaccine, they wouldn't share it with us. This isn't \"being the bigger man\" this is \"enabling and even encouraging totalitarian regimes.\" \n\nWomen who escape NK speak about how they would rather become sex slaves in China than to be sent back. Any government that is so heinous should not receive world support at all. \n\nSucks to the people there, but perhaps corona or other awful shit happening will finally cause some internal action. Maybe the military with coup. Who knows. But I sure as fuck know that HELPING THEM will only lead to them being assholes and laughing about us behind our back while they rape their country dry.", "959" ], [ "> Firstly, a wage which is enough to live on in West Africa does not need to be as high as it would in America. \n\nAlready answered: \n\n > I'd rather see companies have financial incentives to hire Americans, because that helps stimulate our economy. Why would I want them to go stimulate Africa's economy? So that the money can go to some local warlord, or fund their anti-white genocide? No thanks. \n\n > It's completely disingenuous of you to imply that the only available options are to either exploit African child-labourers (and even slaves in the case of some cocoa farms) or use American workers. \n\nOther countries have duties to their citizens. Our government has a duty to ours. You obviously aren't any form of \"Lib\"-Anything if you believe that governments should have some global responsibility. \n\n > Secondly, what American workers are they going to use? There aren't enough (if any) cocoa farms in the US... 70% of the world's cocoa production comes from just four countries in West Africa. \n\nTough shit. That's part of their business problem, not mine. If I wanted to be a farmer in America, I'd sooner start planting corn than pineapples. \n\nIf they want to make a business, perhaps they should put some of their BILLIONS into research to be able to grow cocoa in different climates / smaller areas. That's how capitalism works. People make investments into R & D to be able to own some market share. \n\nOutsourcing labor and then propping up Africa's economy isn't the answer. And we owe Africans nothing, just as they owe us nothing.", "246" ], [ "> If company A has foreign workers, but will do the same job for x% less than company B (that has no foreign workers), then the government, and thus the whole nation, is subsidizing this hypothetically inefficient business.\n\nAnd that's okay. Because the money that is going into that company is being _recycled_ into our economy. Maybe Company B costs 10% more, but they are dispersing 30% more money back into _our_ economy by using in-country workers. This means more circulation into small businesses and lower unemployment rates (which means that there are fewer unemployed people who are burdens to the system in one way or another; fewer homeless people or prisoners who are burdens in one way or another). \n\nCapitalism within the government isn't about paying the least amount of money possible with tax dollars. It's about doing with tax dollars what is best for _the economy of the nation_. A capitalistic government is better to spend $1000 to get $900 worth of value than it is to spend $700 to get $300 worth of value.", "101" ], [ "Bagholders staring at their blockfolio aren't the same as potential investors considering swapping their BTC to Nano. \n\nIf you want to buy Nano, 99% of the time you are going through BTC. \n\nResistance levels are not formed out of USD. They are formed out of sats. If BTC tanked by 80% tomorrow, Nano's satoshi price wouldn't multiply by 8 to compensate. It would fall through any USD floors immediately. \n\nSimilarly, if the dollar crashed tomorrow and BTC went up 800%, Nano would also go up 800% as well since its satoshi price would sit about the same.", "1008" ], [ "> The idea that we could and should prompt change in another country with those same deaths is just beyond comprehension as a rational view point. \n\nAction VS inaction. There is a strong difference between going out of our way to kill them VS taking a hard-line stance of either \"You participate in this global shit or you do not.\" They don't get to show up at the dinner table when it's time for handouts and then fuck off and launch ballistic missiles at Japan when they get their goodies. \n\n > Idk man, if I sincerely thought that I’d have to really look at myself and think about whether my existence is better or worse for this planet. \n\nYeah yeah. I get it. You're a bleeding heart teenager-to-young-adult. Get a grip, clown. There are bad people out in the world. NK wouldn't give us a vaccine if they had it and we didn't. Losers like you who allow them to get away with this bullshit year over year just ENCOURAGE them. \n\nYou're like the hero in those cartoons that would save a literal child predator from death because that's the \"heroic\" thing to do, and then claim no responsibility when said predator goes on to rape more kids. No. Sometimes the heroic thing to do is to let the evil people of this world reap what they have sown. \n\nDoes that mean that innocent NK civilians will be caught in the crossfire? Yeah. Is that our fault? No. It is the fault of their leader that is oppressing them. Either we wage war and free them or we back off and leave them to stew. But this half-baked shit of \"support the leaders while the leaders fuck their people AND us\" is pathetic. \n\nYour arguments have no merit beyond you just saying \"you are a bad person and I have no faith in humanity.\" Grow up, child. And learn to put some line breaks into your paragraphs, moron.", "1014" ], [ "Yeah. [We get an average of about 18 school shootings per year, with 2 people injured per shooting. That comes out to about 36 victims per year.](_URL_0_) Out of a population roughly 1 million times that. \n\nOn the other hand, we also have averaged about 43 deaths by lightning strike per year, so... about 20% higher. \n\nSo yeah, I guess the two countries are about the same. I'd totally forego my $400k/year job with health benefits and big ass house and shit so that I can live in a mud hut in Vietnam eating dogs to survive. \n\nI swear to God, how fucking dense are morons who actually buy into this anti-American propaganda? To think that your third world shithole even remotely compares to a fully developed Western country (any of them) because \"at least we don't have school shootings!\" is ridiculous.", "701" ], [ "I definitely understand the other viewpoint, and I don't disagree that there's validity to the viewpoint. And I agree that people should be accountable of their actions, even if I disagree with the notion that the government should be the entity holding them accountable. \n\nI was surprised to see someone flared as LibRight (not you - the other guy) advocating for what amounts to telling other people what they can do with their bodies, but it's all a spectrum here of course - not trying to gatekeep him.", "651" ], [ "Man betrayed his crew over \"chivalry\" and then sexually assaulted <PERSON>'s body when swapped into it during PH. \n\nI'm fine with a chivalrous character. I'm fine with a perverted character. \n\nBut pick one. \n\nI can't accept that he betrayed the crew, unwilling to fight <PERSON> *even knowing that <PERSON> desperately needed him* during EL out of \"respect for women\" but then simultaneously first-thing gropes <PERSON>'s tits when he's in her body in PH. So much for \"respect.\" He picks and chooses when to be \"respectful,\" and his moments of \"respecting women\" are almost SOLELY related to fighting them, which comes off largely misogynistic and completely undermines the dreams and aspirations of other characters (like <PERSON>). \n\nI already know I'm going to get downvoted by Sanji fanboys who have no better argument here than \"yikes\" and \"cringe,\" but whatever. Hypocrites.", "1011" ], [ "His implication was racist. \n\nMisusing science is sick. No better than \"if we evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys???\" \n\nThere's also nature VS nurture at play here. In almost every case, nurture matters far more than nature. \n\nIf you actually think that 15% more testosterone would account for a 300% increase in likelihood to commit crime, then how come men aren't committing 99% of total crimes given they have like orders of magnitude more testosterone? \n\nThe science that's there is conflicting and inconclusive. Trying to draw beyond what's directly stated (15% more testos - > 100% higher prostate cancer risk) is fine **as a hypothesis to be tested** but not as a **conclusion to be reached**. Believing in an untested hypothesis is nothing more than an agenda. \n\nAnd pushing an agenda that puts down another race is, by definition, racist.", "177" ], [ "> I'd be more surprised to hear that all humans are exactly the same after 100,000 years of evolution in different climates eating different things among different landscapes. \n\nI would as well if there weren't so much intermixing over that time. \n\nLet's not pretend like people from Africa are 1000% pureblood going all the fucking way back 100-200k years. It was just, like, 4k(?) years ago that <PERSON> was pillaging northern Africa, and he wasn't a black dude. I guarantee people have moved north and south and all kinds of ways in that timespan.", "931" ], [ "The problem isn't with acknowledging the statistics. The problem is threefold: \n\n1. Attempting to extrapolate. \"Well, since black people are more violent, THAT BLACK GUY is more violent!\" This robs people of individuality \n2. The statistics don't tell the full story. Ever get picked on in school, and then you fought back, and YOU WERE the one in trouble? Kinda like that. There's a very real (and very reasonable) argument to make that certain people are born into shit situations at no fault of their own, and acting shitty as a result of nurture and not nature \n3. Even if you conclusively prove that *on the top end* blacks are, say, 10% more aggressive, or whites are, say, 3% smarter, you will have every bumfuck dumbass trying to use that as a sweeping generalization for their racism. Yes, maybe the top scientist in the world is a white guy that is 3% smarter than the top black scientist in the world, but that sure as fuck does not mean Racist <PERSON> in Georgia is smarter than every random black guy he has dealings with. \n\nBasically: statistics are sometimes prevented from being seen by the masses because the masses will misinterpret them and act like dumbasses. We all know that stupid people exist in the world that ruin everything; this should be no exception. \n\nThe REAL tragedy here is that, BECAUSE those dumbasses exist and BECAUSE racists exist, we can't just do the science to get to the heart of the issues. Certain subjects become \"taboo.\"", "271" ], [ "I don't care for big corporations, but I want to be able to make my own big corporation and not have someone else tell me what to do. That's very libright. \n\nThough, I believe in a fair game with fair rules. I want to win fairly and I want there to be antitrust rules so that people can play a round-2 with me and that I must continue to play well to ensure my continued dominance. \n\nI don't want to have a monopoly and rest on my laurels. And I don't want other companies to have a monopoly that prevents me from breaking in when I'm getting started. \n\nSo I can be anti-monopoly but pro-megacorp at the same time. It's just about where you define fairness.", "23" ], [ "> The only time that we need women specifically for certain positions is when it comes to women’s issues. That’s it.\n\nEven at that, surely you only believe that because you think that being a woman is part of what makes her *the most qualified*. \n\nIf the most qualified person in the world to perform a vagina surgery is some dude, surely he should get the job over someone else. \n\nEven if the job is something like \"being a therapist to underaged female rape victims\" where they would get along much better with a female therapist, you're still picking the female therapist because *she's the best person for the job*. Again, if by some stretch there were some INSANELY CHARISMATIC MAN who could make all women forget about the awful rape and move on with their life, he should get the job first. \n\nLiterally **ALWAYS** the job should go to the person who is most qualified. SOMETIMES part of the qualification is due to their gender and the correlating experiences (therapist for women, doctor for women, author for women, a waitress at a hooters, etc), but it's still the fact that they are MORE qualified for the job BECAUSE of the fact, not DESPITE the fact.", "867" ], [ "I'm not even gonna fact-check you here. \n\nSo let me get this straight. \n\nWomen commit 20% of violent crime. \nMen, who average about [1500%-3000% as much testosterone as women](_URL_0_) commit 4x that much. \n\nAnd then you're telling me that black men, who apparently have 15% more testosterone than white men, commit 300% more crime. \n\nSo let me get this straight. \n\nThe difference between a man and a woman is that a man has upwards of 3000% more testosterone, and so he commits 300% more crimes. \n\nAnd the difference between a black man and a white man is that the black man has 15% more testosterone, and so he commits 300% more crimes. \n\nYeah. Totally science-based and fact-pilled and not racist whatsoever LOL", "271" ], [ "Yo yo yo, other way around. If someone is thinking of giving me cheap bags, I sure as hell don't want some guy telling people \"You'd better buy now... or FeAr MiSsInG OuT!!!\" \n\nNah I'm only joking. I remove posts like this from the sub all the time. FUD-inciting, FOMO-inciting, anyone saying \"trading isn't profitable,\" etc. I hate that kind of shit. People should be learning to trade to do better, not giving up before getting started due to discouragement.", "937" ], [ "> Even then, they may not have the means or capacity to take on such a speculative asset.\n\nThe poorest of the poor also tend to _spend_, while the richest can hoard. Nano was distributed to the ultrapoor, but still wound up in the hands of the rich. There's no avoiding it. The reason I can buy Nano and sit on it is because I don't _need_ to spend it to eat. \n\nEven if you look at middle class who also don't need to spend it, they just can't buy as much. \n\nIt's honestly an interesting phenomenon that I'm intrigued about how it will play out, but I agree with you entirely that crypto will likely exacerbate the wealth disparity. Some rich will lose wealth, some poor will gain wealth, but ultimately there'll just be a bigger disparity. Deflationary currencies might be screwed for this reason alone.", "1008" ], [ "IMO, a big part of trading is becoming familiar with the ability to pull it out. As long as you have set target goals, you're in good shape. \n\nLots of people will say \"time in the market beats timing the market,\" but then watch their investment go from $1 to $38 in 2018 without cashing out, and then back down to $0.30, only to be regrouping themselves for round 2 with a similar lack of plans. \n\nIn the end, I often make bad trades that don't end up in my favor, but part of it is also hedging. For example, my biggest loser trade recently was a partial sell at $4. In retrospect, it's taken a lot of work to \"get back to where I was\" with successful trades VS just sitting in the coin. \n\nBut it also offered a different upside: had Nano gone back to $3.50 like it was for weeks prior, I would have gained about 15%. Had it crashed to $2 or something, I'd have gained even more. \n\nI think that making real strategies and sticking to them is important, and I also think that getting some experience with trading is useful for everybody really.", "937" ], [ "Entirely. Another thing to consider, too, is that _most_ trades will be winners as long as you're patient enough. \n\nConsider this: back in December 2017, both the person who bought Nano at $10 and the person who sold it at $10 were winners. The buyer could have sold it at $30, and the seller could have re-bought it at $1. The seller just needed to wait longer to become a winner. \n\nPeople think I'm crazy for selling Nano around these prices, but then the same people are in other comments saying \"I could see Nano falling back to $4 during the next big dip.\" Those same people will say \"BUY THE DIP, BOYS!!!\" but have no FIAT to do so with.", "937" ], [ "> I have tried swing trading. Although overall I am up, I just don't like the stress associated with it. Like I would wake up in the middle of the night checking the price, or thinking about whether the price moving for me or against me all the time.\n\nI used to do that when I would trade for tiny amounts constantly. Buiy at 3.5, sell at 3.6, buy at 3.5, sell at 3.6, etc. Too much hassle. With bigger numbers after bigger differences, I almost never find myself looking at charts. In fact, I prefer not to see them so as to avoid FUD/FOMO. I tend to check them a few times a day, and mainly in conjunction with moderating here. \n\n > Do you take outside money to invest? haha like a hedge fund, I stake you some Nano and you take a portion of the profit? \n\nI have unironically considered doing this lately. It would have some legal implications and I would need to register with the SEC and go through some shit, but maybe some day.", "511" ], [ "> just because the rich will be able to take advantage of it more does not mean it does not provide the same benefits to the poor. \n\nIn a deflationary currency, the value over time increases, and therefore those who need to spend it the least get the biggest benefit. In an inflationary currency, those who hoard it lose money over time. \n\nIn theory, if every single currency in the world were inflationary, the rich would have to constantly work just to outpace inflation. The rich manage to stay rich by using their inflationary money to buy deflationary assets. \n\n > Almost everyone I know that is over 25 years old did not know that the USD is not a good store of value and were keeping 100% of their long term wealth in a simple savings account. \n\nThis is crazy to me, but yeah.. people's ignorance is pretty astounding.", "170" ], [ "There's a pretty big difference between generalizing \"all men are evil\" and generalizing \"all misandrists are shit.\" \n\nLike, let me put it this way: \n\nIs \"all jews are evil\" correct? No. \nIs \"all nazis are evil\" correct? No. But it's a lot more fucking correct than the first one. \n\nGeneralizations can have _degrees_ of wrongness. If I say \"all black people are from Africa\" that's a generalization and wrong, but if I say \"all black people are from Mars\" that's a generalization and _fucking wrong_.", "715" ], [ "It means \"5 to 15 to 25\" \n\nHis point is simple, and either you're being intentionally dense or are a moron. He's saying that roads and shit are not built with TODAY'S tax dollars, but yesterday's. If you live in a country for 30 years, the infrastructure and everything else was largely paid for by you. Other people who show up late to the party get it all for free. \n\nHis argument is that natives are disproportionately unfairly treated by immigrants who move in and enjoy all the perks of being a native without having to have done the work for it. \n\nIf you disagree with him, at least argue his points instead of digressing with stupid shit. If you aren't smart enough to have pieced together what he was saying, save everyone the effort and don't reply.", "799" ], [ "> Did anything I said seem irrational tho?\n\nNah. I just got a kick out of the thread. It opened with this: \n\n > All I'm asking for is for a $1000 Nano... \nand \n > If bitcoin hits 200,000 this cycle, than... \n\nAnd ended with the gem: \n\n > Rationality and reality will eventually make it into the market. \n\nI agree with your sentiment and I know what they were trying to say as well. It was just funny to see such hyperbolic possibilities preceding the \"some day rationality will win!\" sentiment.", "1008" ], [ "But the reason doesn't really matter to the outcome. \n\nLet's say you fear men because men are biologically programmed to be more aggressive due to testosterone and that science can prove it (although empirically incidence of domestic violence, for example, is far higher in lesbian couples and lowest in gay couples and skews heavily from the woman towards the man _despite_ rampant underreporting of male-based domestic victimization due to toxic masculinity standards that stigmatize men admitting they were abused by a woman). But let's pretend that's true. \n\nAnd let's pretend that black people violent commit more crime _solely_ because of socioeconomic issues that are beyond their control, such as ancestral systemic oppression (again DESPITE the fact that other countries where black people are not even the minority AND countries where black people do not have any such ancestral/systemic oppression that report similar statistics). \n\nEven assuming both of those things _were_ rrefutably true... So what? Fearing every man you see due to biological statistics and fearing every black man you see due to racial crime statistics are both literally the same thing: ignoring an individual to make presuppositions based on statistics. \n\nHell, even if you could prove that 99% of men CHOOSE OF THEIR OWN WILL to be violent and 51% of blacks ARE FORCED DUE TO THEIR BIOLOGY to commit violent crimes, the fact of the matter is that fearing a random man or fearing a random black person is prejudicial and discriminatory in both circumstances, regardless of the \"reasoning\" behind it, even if, in this hypothetical scenario, men were _verifiably, inherently_ more evil/dangerous than black people. It'd _still_ be prejudicial. \n\nLeave it to an SJW to try to justify his mental gymnastics with little more than just \"forget it. I don't wanna talk about it. You people don't understand nuance.\" Yeah. WE'RE all the retards. Go back on r/depression and cry about your white guilt some more, loser.", "271" ], [ "I delete crossposts when I see them. I saw posts [like this](_URL_0_) that talked about the affair, but didn't link to it directly. \n\nLooking at the comments now, someone did link to r/CC in it.. at 2 AM my time, 5 hours after the thread was up. With all due respect, I don't tend to re-view every post in the middle of the night to make sure that a random poster isn't breaking _our own_ rules, let alone some other subreddit's rules. \n\nFWIW I think it's fair for you to nuke the posts that people crosspost from here to there and for you to ban the offenders. It's your sub to do what you want with. I have no problem with you being harsh with people who repeatedly break your rules. \n\nPeople here know the drill by now. If they do the wrong things, they'll be banned from that sub. I'm not gonna ban them _here_ for breaking your rules.. surely that would be silly. You don't ban people from r/CC for breaking my rules, do you?", "156" ], [ "I just don't really see it. Our highest thread here gets upvoted to like... +140, and that's only on a daily thread with 1.2k+ comments where people say \"guys! remember to upvote the thread!\" - not joking, have literally seen it twice. Sometimes we'll get a random thread with an xpost go to +9 and I'll delete it. Often, I'll see people saying \"The sub that shall not be named has a post about a Nano tool at +2k guys!\" that has, like, 20 upvotes. \n\nIf you think that the tool that the dude made that had like 2k-3k+ upvotes was because of Nano crossposting, I dunno man. This isn't even the primary nano sub. That's r/nanocurrency, which.. maybe they're doing it. I'm not a mod there, so I don't know. \n\nThe tool looked clean and had love put into it and apparently people who aren't good at mental math found it useful. I'm sure it could have defaulted to ShitCoin#77 and still gotten 3k upvotes. \n\nI think that both the extent to which xposts are made _and_ their impact are greatly exaggerated. I'm not doubting that you have to deal with a lot of Nano shills, I just suspect that if we were to draw a venn diagram between \"People who like Nano\" and \"People who like Cryptocurrency\" there would be a _lot_ of overlap. Have you considered that some huge % of your subreddit subscribers who frequent the sub also just happen to frequent this sub, and thus you just naturally have a few hundred/thousand very active members who are also Nano shills?", "434" ], [ "> Even saying - go look for the post about XYZ on the front page of /r/cryptocurrency - is considered manipulation. If the folks in this subreddit don't want to respect that rule, which is basically a reddit sitewide rule, then there's not a lot to discuss imo.\n\nIf you can get a Reddit admin on record saying that linking to another sub or even suggesting that another sub has a relevant post is against the entire site's terms of use, I'll make some hardline rules about it. \n\nPretty sure that the r/CC-linking feature and the crosspost feature run in direct opposition to that, though, as well as how every other subreddit on the site seems to run. \n\nWe both know that these are _your_ rules, and you can absolutely have whatever rules you want. I never had a problem with you enforcing your rules in your sub. \n\nIf you recall, the original tiff I had with Snorlax in r/CC was because I went to an r/CC thread (very rare, I'm almost never over there) and saw a post _he_ made that included Nano. One (just _one_) of the top-level comments was made by a pro-Nano shill who then started asserting how great Nano was (and with whom I disagreed, actually), and it was called a \"moderate case of brigading.\" \n\nIf Nano isn't even allowed to have one top-level comment thread dedicated to it in a post made within r/CC by someone else (_they_ who mentioned Nano to begin with) while SLO or EGLD or some other total shitcoins had like 3+ top-level comments _each_, then it doesn't sound like Nano has a seat at the table, anyway. \n\nAnd FWIW in reference to a comment I made earlier, [I'm not joking, this sub sucks at upvoting posts.](_URL_0_) Our top upvoted thread EVER was ~540. A random dude claiming in a random comment chain of a random thread \"hey guys, check out r/CC there's a Nano thing\" is simply not going to bring +3k upvotes or whatever.", "728" ], [ "> not even sure if we're unbanned already\n\nI did get unbanned, seemingly as a separate incident a few days to a week later. \n\nFWIW, here are some ideas that I would like to see to ensure _fair exchange_ in both directions. I would be fine with _all of_ or _some of_ or _compromised versions of_ any of the following, as long as we can eventually reach an agreement that it's fair to both parties. \n\n1. Have some clearly-defined rules of what's allowed that are fair. E.g., cross-posting to r/CC when the post in question has at least 1k upvotes anyway (since it's already front-page material and getting another 100 upvotes isn't gonna matter). \n2. Fair rules ensuring that Nano users can discuss Nano in normal circumstances, such as having at least one dedicated top-level comment thread in a post that mentions Nano or a topic tangentially related to Nano, without said top-level comment being purged. \n3. Rules allowing a post focused _entirely on Nano_ to be upvoted to the front page (assuming it is quality content unto itself that merits its organic growth to that front page status; NOT brigading a random shit nano shill post) at least one time per 3 days. \n4. No removal of high-quality content that tangentially relates to Nano, even if it gets spammed by Nano shills. We can't stop every Nano shill and I don't want to create an avenue for a bad, anti-Nano actor to spam \"YEAH NANO 4 LYFE\" to get high-quality threads deleted. I.e., ban the shills that won't obey the primary top-level comment, but DO NOT delete the thread. \n\nIn return, we can do any of the following: \n\n1. More aggressively police people's r/CC xposting and involvement. Currently I remove posts that feel too \"brigadey\" but I would issue temporary bans on users as well for xposting to r/CC if I thought there were fair rules to begin with. \n2. Have automod rules against crossposting / saying \"r/CC\" \n3. Open to suggestions \n\nBecause so far, this seems like a huge negotiations 101 failure. r/CC wants us to do more work and adversely affect our own people more, and all they're bringing to the table is \"we won't ban you.\" I don't go to that sub and if we're effectively policed into silence then we are as good as banned. \n\nI'll enforce their rules heavily _IFF_ I believe the rules are fair.", "620" ], [ "> Then why haven't you banned people like jwinterm yet??\n\nI can't speak for <PERSON>, but I think it's hilarious when u/jwinterm posts here. He's totally my boy. Before he got the rule in place to get people to stop pinging him, he'd come in here all howdy rowdy and tell people they're retards and shit, and then people would clamor to ban him over nothing. \n\nIt was very popcorn worthy. I might disagree with <PERSON> on virtually everything about _this particular stuff_ but I delight when <PERSON> shows up and it all kicks into high gear. It's very entertaining.", "621" ], [ "& u/defectivekill: \n\nI've read some TA from BTC maximalists that indicated that _they_ thought BTC 52k would be a ceiling before a retrace to 42k. I think with 52k currently being tested we'll know for sure. \n\nEither way, Nano isn't going anywhere. I am less \"optimistic\" about Nano crashing, though. \n\nI am indeed still tethered up, but I have canceled the 4.5-5.3 plan to move to higher buy orders. (1) because _certain people_ (cough) threw down like a quarter million in buy orders above my previous buy orders AND (2) because I think if the trend continues Nano will oscillate between $5.8 and $7 and I am paying opportunity cost.", "928" ], [ "> If there is a huge overlap in the venn diagram, then by definition it would have a huge impact, right? \n\nNot necessarily. Consider a venn diagram that looks like [this](_URL_0_). A huge majority of nanotrade users are in r/CC, but a minority of r/CC users are in nanotrade. It makes sense, since this is a case of \"all A's are B's but not all B's are A's\" -- that is, **all Nano users are into cryptocurrency** but **not all cryptocurrency users are into Nano**. I don't believe that we can meaningfully impact your sub, but I do believe that you banning all of the nanotrade users generates a lot of upset users here. \n\nPlus, I think it makes sense given the sub sizes -- and even influence. Our users know who you are, but r/CC's users don't know who I am. You can go into individual coin subs and say \"Implement our rules or I will ban your users\" and most of them just bend knee and say \"Right away, sir! Should I do that before or after sending my wife to your place???\" If those same mods came into r/CC and demanded you implement their rules, they'd (1) be buried in /new and you'd never read it and (2) you'd laugh at them and tell them to send their wives to your place. \n\nWe both know there's an influence/power asymmetry between your sub and theirs/ours. It's why you feel that you can come into other subs and throw your weight around and get what you want. I'm honestly not saying it as an emotion thing, just being totally straight with what the facts are. I don't hold it against you. Nothing wrong with knowing that you're the big dog with big dog authority and using it to big dog people who aren't respecting it. \n\nI'm just saying that that is why it leads to... \n\n > I just don't understand why it's such a hill to die on for people in this sub (and previously other nano sub), and **every other sub is just like \"ok we won't link or direct people there\"**. \n\n... the fact that they don't mind bending knee. They fear authority and the repercussions of non-compliance, whereas I'm just way too libertarian to care + find the whole thing funny + it's just Reddit. I think the other Nano sub has abandoned this sub as \"orb's domain of degeneracy.\" The two Nano subs don't have much in common.. I'm not even a mod there... I'm also like the bottom mod here LOL \n\nHonestly, if not for the benevolent mods in this sub like u/Crypto_Jasper, I would just go full r/worldnews with the place. I'm totally the problem, but I like to think of us as one happy retarded family. Let's all grab a drink together some day after corona when our crypto bags are weighing us down or paying for the drinks.", "621" ], [ "> Here, we just had some pending transactions\n\nImagine thinking that spam doesn't matter because it's \"just pending transactions\" while also unironically believing that Nano could someday actually matter as a worldwide currency. \n\nYou didn't get paid for 3 weeks -- sorry, \"just some pending transactions.\" \n\nYou didn't pay rent for 3 weeks? \"Sorry, just some pending transactions.\" \n\nYou couldn't get bailed out of jail for a few weeks, so instead you took a backdoor prison pounding? \"Sorry, just some pending transactions.\" \n\nHow nice it must be to think that fast confirmation times in a network that prides itself on _literally only two things_ (fast, feeless) don't matter. I swear, some of you guys would support the currency as \"THE COIN OF THE FUTURE\" even if it dropped to 1 TPS and cost $15 per tx.", "691" ], [ "> Edit: If the current saturation limit for the network is 200CPS, then an attack like this would force everyone with 10N or less to only transact every 8.3mins. So it would be problematic.\n\nIf someone took 1mil Nano and split it among 100k accounts that each have 10 Nano, they would be able to send out 100k requests at the same time every ~50k seconds (~0.5 days). The seconds are calculated based on the fact that they own roughly 1% of the network (1mil out of 133m - I rounded up for easy math) and 1% of the total network's throughput (assuming 200 TPS) is 2 TPS, and then they divided 2 TPS by 100k = 2 / 100k TPS = 1 transaction per 50k seconds (so ~13 hours or so?). \n\nIt would lock up part of the network for 100k/200 = 500 seconds, or about 8 minutes. So every ~13 hours, they could lock up the network for about 8 minutes. The part of the network they would lock up would be: \n\n1. The NQ \n2. The PQ below 10 Nano \n\nUsers with below 10 Nano account for roughly 0.1% of the global Nano wealth. By no means is this 0.1% of the _users_ (more, for sure), but by attack they control very little ability to impact the price of the currency (which ultimately removes the profitability from this attack). So it'd amount to a ~5 million dollar investment into a pointless attack. \n\nStill, it's a vector that is actively being discussed (particularly spamming the NQ out from the ultra-low PQ) -- there are 3 proposed solutions so far, and at least 1 of those could address this exact situation.", "543" ], [ "> How much work it is to add something like TaaC implemenation into the Nano protocol?\n\nProbably a fair amount. Not something that could be done well in under a month I'd guess. \n\n > Does it break a lot of compatibility with the existing protocol, hence <PERSON> might be very hesitant to rush this out? \n\nNo. It's totally compatible with the existing protocol _except_ it would require a state block change, since timestamps would need to be signed. Though, they could be semi-malleable in the short-term, which would only result in spam attacks still being feasible by.. say.. the US Government who also launched MitM against Binance to force them into NQ. And only _until_ the next state block. \n\n > I just wonder how feasible it is to get this in the v22 upgrade. \n\nNot a chance. \n\nThis has more to do with a lot of things that have nothing to do with technology. The very nature by which exchanges would need to interact with the protocol may need to change. Binance and other exchanges might need multiple hot wallets, which would mean that they need good software to interface with them (a load balancer, if you will). Nodes like Binance, playnano, and faucets would need to be warned ahead of time to adjust their usage to smooth out their transactions (like a consistent 1 TPS instead of bursting out 1k TPS every 1k seconds), both for compatibility with how the PQ works and, quite frankly, just for the good / overall health and stability of the network at large. \n\nAnd virtually all software, all wallets, etc. would need ample time to update their code bases to properly interact with the network. Including timestamps, gaming the PQ to take advantage of `MAX_BURST`, and more. There would need to be a pre-release period where these developers had time to react and update their software. \n\nIt's a big change in the _human_ aspect of the protocol. I doubt it's an undertaking that could be rolled out properly in under ~2-3 months, even if we had completely ironed out every implementation detail (which we haven't). \n\nMy guess is, best case scenario, 6 months out.", "543" ], [ "This is centralization, but if we're talking \"for a few months\" then we're basically saying \"can we centralize Nano for a few months to rush out changes?\" to which the answer is \"probably yeah.\" Though that's a dangerous path to tread, for a lot of reasons. And it wouldn't shorten the timeframe here down below ~3-4 months, which is how long it'll take to come up with ironing out the proposal, discuss it more, and implement it.. even completely removing the human elements. \n\nIMO, better to wait until the solution can be implemented robustly.", "78" ], [ "> why this scenario wasn’t thought of and\n\nFWIW, the TaaC & P4Q proposal was thought of _in 2017-2018_ in response to reading the whitepaper, [which says](_URL_0_): \n\n > A malicious entity could send many unnecessary but valid\ntransactions between accounts under its control in an attempt\nto saturate the network. With no transaction fees they are\nable to continue this attack indefinitely. However, the PoW\nrequired for each transaction limits the transaction rate the\nmalicious entity could generate without significantly investing\nin computational resources. \n\nI.e., the whitepaper admits that spam is a problem IF an attacker invests significantly in computational resources. \n\nIf this attack never happened, people were already thinking about it/working on it. \n\nThe attack becomes more appetizing as the currency gains value. There's a balance between implementing security too early and implementing it too late.", "831" ], [ "> But that doesn't mean that cultures should be frozen in time and protected from any external influence.\n\nI'd agree, but the point isn't that the American culture _should_ be frozen in time. It's the double-standard hypocrisy by which a person who unironically believes that Group A should let people assimilate into their culture (even if it alters the culture) while the same person argues that Group A should not visit the homeland of Group B or use decorative ornaments of Group B because that is colonialism or cultural appropriation. \n\nLet's be consistent. Either: \n\n1. Cultures are malleable. People can come here and interfere with our culture, and we can travel and interfere with theirs. As long as it's generally done respectfully. \n2. Cultures are frozen and must be honored. People cannot come here and interfere with our culture, and we must not travel elsewhere and push our culture on others. \n\nIt's one or the other. Certain groups want to cherry pick for which of each they advocate. And that's scummy and typically inspired by anti-white racism.", "255" ], [ "> Then imagine being confronted with the reality of American race relations.\n\nOr the \"reality\" of it, as portrayed by a certain group of people, in any case. \n\nI group up in a predominantly white area but had tons of latino friends, a few black friends, a few asian friends. We were all poor. I never saw any of them targeted over their skin color. They never spoke with me about being targeted or harassed or any mean thing being said over their skin color. I even _asked them about it_ when the SJW shit started hitting the fan, and had several people tell me \"I'm as clueless as you are.\" \n\nI can count on one hand the amount of times in my life that I was the victim of someone treating me sub-human over my race (black girls, incidentally, acting like I am disgusting as a white man). My friends could also count on one hand that they recalled interacting with people who treated them the same way. \n\nBut if you watch the news, oh man, you wouldn't believe that it could be true. Originally, I just believed \"I guess it's different in different places,\" but as I watched some kids I grew up with -- kids who I know never suffered or witnessed racially based shit in their lives -- start \"coming out\" as though they grew up in the fucking ghetto taking daily whippings from billionaires, I realized that it's largely just about victim politics. \n\n > Then realize that most people hate themselves already and have never been taught how to cope with stress properly... \n\nThis is a very, VERY liberal use of the word \"most.\" I think it's far more likely that you and your friends hate yourselves, and so you think that this is the norm. This is not the norm whatsoever.", "1020" ], [ "I am one of said doomer libs. \n\n<PERSON> should make a company that gets a shit-ton of other doomer libs to sign on and agree to vote for the same thing, whatever the group decides, and then just vote as a monolith. Even on shit they don't agree with. Just to show they have power. \n\nAnd then once they have power, they demand change that actually benefits their constituents. \n\nYou'd think that LibRight, the party of making fucking money, would have found a way to make fucking money.", "736" ], [ "> Republicans had all branches of government for years, and he still failed. Really makes you think.\n\nAbout what? The fact that the parties are more auth? About the filibuster? What's there to think about here? \n\nI am not <PERSON> by any means, but you're just throwing out some bullshit. <PERSON> didn't hold \"all 3 branches.\" <PERSON> held 1 branch. A party that barely supported him \"held\" another (to whatever degree it's possible to hold congress when senate can filibuster everything), and SCOTUS has consistently ruled in a way that's \"fair and disinterested within the realm of human bias.\" \n\nIt isn't like <PERSON> was appointing his son onto the SCOTUS or some shit. \n\nAnd fix your flair.", "861" ], [ "> just as the founding fathers intended.\n\nIt sounds like you're a huge advocate of the filibuster, but this isn't actually true whatsoever. The founding fathers didn't _even want_ political parties, let alone parties that could cockblock progress. \n\nAnd why would I give a shit about what a bunch of people who didn't have the internet intended? They also intended for us to defend our homes with arms equal to that of the military because nuclear weapons didn't exist yet.", "45" ], [ "At the risk of being brazenly insensitive, I cannot fathom a world where someone as obviously intellectually capable as you are incapable of earning _any_ wage for a living. \n\nYour English is excellent. Your intellectual reasoning seems sound. You can obviously type. You have eyesight. \n\nProgramming, translating, or solving fucking CAPTCHA's all seem to fit onto a spectrum of jobs that you might be capable of doing. \n\nAt the very least, I can't imagine how writing eloquent and elaborate posts on Reddit is within your capabilities while earning money is not.", "247" ], [ "> Is it really just because <PERSON> is trans and the main characters are female?\n\nNever played TLOU 2 but I'll say this: \n\nI HATE when a character is trans and people make a big deal out of it OR when a cast is all female that wouldn't even be 20% female irl. \n\nThese things would equally annoy me: \n\n1. <PERSON> is trans. Big plot points about what it's like to be trans. \n2. <PERSON> is black. Big plot points about what it's like to be black. \n3. MC is cishet white mal. Big plot points about what it's like to be cishet white male. \n\nI just don't give a shit. These details make up ZERO of someone's personality and ZERO of the story. Unless the story is like a romance-based visual novel (which I would never play), it isn't relevant. \n\nThese things would also equally annoy me: \n\n1. A conference room full of doctors. They're all black women, and it isn't some kind of \"black women in medicine\" conference. \n2. A professional basketball team set in America where the majority of the team are white men. \n3. A group of friends that is exactly 49% male, 50% female, 1% trans, perfectly equally distributed among the racial groups, with the sole white person being a lesbian. \n\nAll of these are just unrealistic breakdowns of groups. If I saw a group of 7 friends that were like 2 darker skinned/maybe latino, 2-3 women and an asian girl -- that's about as much diversity _within a single group_ that seems reasonable. \n\nThe reality is that even the most diverse groups and the most accepting of people just don't end up in some kind of wonky ass combination that doesn't accurately represent the demographics of the real world. \n\nI'm fine with putting 4 black dudes, 2 black girls where 1 is a lesbian, and 1 white guy into a group. I'm fine with having a group that's 3 straight white dudes, 2 straight white girls, 1 asian guy, and 1 white trans person. \n\nBut when shit is either (1) supposed to be representative of a group (e.g., pro basketball scene) that isn't accurate AT ALL to that group or (2) divided _so perfectly equally_ that it feels contrived, it takes away from the premise of the story and ends up feeling unrealistic at best and preachy at worst. \n\nAnd that's not to say I'll just turn it off, but let's just say that people who are _prioritizing their agenda above story quality_ tend to have the latter suffer, which itself _will_ make me turn it off.", "632" ], [ "> That's the problem with being lib-right, you can't condemn behavior just because you don't personally like it, unless it violates the NAP ofc.\n\nNot every lib right just buys into the NAP. The idea that lib-right must conform to something is _in itself_ authoritarian. \n\nYou can condemn behavior even if you think it shouldn't be against the law. \n\nYou can make a ratings agency that, for example, rates games that include _any_ political message as NSFChildren and then leave it to parents to decide whether they are OK with their kids playing games rated NSFC. Game developers will need to accept that if they want to put agendas into their games, they are getting a rating equivalent to if they put a graphic rape scene into their game (in the eyes of many parents). This would cut into their bottom line. \n\nIF their message were more important to them than their profit, they could take the hit. If it weren't, they'd remove it. Parents who care more about their kids not being indoctrinated or exposed to certain viewpoints/graphics before a certain age could avoid those games based on the rating. Parents who don't care or wish to intentionally bring up their kids in that certain way can hunt down games with more mature ratings. \n\nLibertarianism doesn't just mean that you have to just blindly accept bullshit, just that _the solution to bullshit is not to just bring in the government to ban it_.", "627" ], [ "> And the problem is evident from your last sentence there:\n\n I actually agree with this stance. People who look to pre-emptively dismiss other viewpoints as prejudicial _themselves_ have views that are too biased to really take seriously. \n\nRefusing to acknowledge flaws in a work because \"the people who hate the flaws are actually just dogwhistling for something else\" is irritating. \n\nIn their mind, a trans char = so fundamentally and unquestionably good that it doesn't even need to be written well or relevant to the plot. \n\nAdditionally, just making characters lesbians JUST CUZ comes across as really fanfictiony, I agree. \n\nFWIW, though, I don't necessarily agree with all of your points: \n\n > Explain to me how a gang of fully grown men have accepted a girl as their leader \n\nI completely agree with your point vis-a-vis physical strength, but men could absolutely accept a woman as their leader. If she were smarter, braver, quicker to action, more charismatic, etc.", "847" ], [ "> Most of librights understand and see degeneracy they are surrounded with, but they are too afraid calling it out.\n\nWhat an ultrashit take. We have no problem calling out dumbasses like you. We just don't think that you lack the right to live. \n\nDon't confuse the fact that we haven't boarded you up on a train to send you to a concentration camp with some belief that we think you're superior or correct or we're afraid to do so. We just believe that you have a right to life, liberty, and being a dumbass just like everyone else. You don't deserve to be killed for being wrong, just shamed. \n\nAnd if I can sell you merch, why would I give a shit? You can be a guy who fucks jars of mayonnaise for all I care, as long as I'm the ones selling you the jars. You can cry about the fall of Western society while I'm laughing all the way to my private island where I fuck your wife.", "965" ], [ "> I feel like she has too much shit on her plate to get into self improvement.\n\nThis is the kind of attitude that leaves people trapped. \n\nNo matter how bad your situation is.. if you have freedom and health and if you work on improving yourself, it will improve. \n\n > She only gets away from being critisized and abused when she's sneaking out of the house, or skipping school, which gets her into more shit! \n\nBeing criticized just isn't a big deal, though? Take some fucking responsibility, though? Say \"Yeah, I'm shit, I'll work on it\" and _actually work on it_, though? \n\nBeing abused is another story altogether, but I'm never gonna just sit back and say \"Yeah, people should skip school to avoid being criticized. That's a fair coping mechanism.\"", "572" ], [ "> I could be legally blind or a quadriplegic for all you know.\n\nBut I did address that. I stated that you seemed able to see and able to type. \n\nIf you were paralyzed from the waist down, for example, you could still program. \n\nIf the nature of your disability is the inability to keep a schedule, then nothing stops you from all kinds of work. Glad to know you're still capable of working. \n\nTbh though you sound like kind of an asshole to assume so much based on what were innocent questions. The rest of my opinions on the matter, I'll reserve for myself.", "679" ], [ "> I think your first paragraph just described a political party, but actually thinking people with power would help others rather than serve themselves seems idealistic and unrealistic.\n\nWhen you have a group of people who are all outcasts, they absolutely would rise up in solidarity and help _themselves_ by acting on behalf of their own constituents. \n\nI didn't describe a party. I described closer to a union. This union would be willing to vote R or D to whichever party was willing to give concessions. They'd become little less than a lobbying force and grow _into_ an _actually successful_ party. \n\n > Trying to get a group of people who believe that the government shouldn't have much power to try to seize power in order to reduce the power of the government is as ridiculous as it sounds. \n\nNo? If you believe that McDonalds should offer healthier options, taking the strategic route of \"get hired at McDonalds and work my way up to the CEO\" or \"earn enough money to buy enough McDonalds stock to become an influential shareholder\" would be extremely reasonable. \n\n > Those who desire power would likely always have more drive to acquire it at all costs than someone who seeks power that they would then give up. \n\nWhat you're saying is that the desire to oppress is greater than the desire to be free. And I am not sure that I agree with that. Oppressing people is something you do as a byproduct of something more preferable (like making money). Freedom is an end goal in it self. \n\n > WalMart, McDonalds, Google, and Amazon are accountable to who? No one. Yet, they still have more political power than any single senator or government official. \n\nFair enough, and probably why I'm both (1) a doomer lib who doesn't vote and (2) a LibRight who cares more about scrooge mcducking wealth than fucking about in politics. \n\nStill, someone could monetize my vote. I'd vote for whoever someone told me to, and even provide them with proof, even if they were an anonymous entity paying only in crypto, if they paid enough.", "593" ], [ "> Race and Identity are good motivators for characters, as a half-back person I promise race affects your life more than you know.\n\nAt best, you're right and admitting that the story isn't relatable to the vast majority of people. At worst, you're just speaking from your own experiences and are wrong. \n\n_Sometimes_ that is what the story is about, and that's fine. \n\nBut when the story _isn't_ about that, and yet the main character is just a lawyer who happens to be a gay trans black lesbian who goes to work with 15 other LGBT+ peeps, the entire thing comes off like a bad Sonic the Hedgehog fanfiction. \n\nAnd when it tanks in theaters/ratings/etc, you can pretend that it was just too deep for the racist white man to understand or whatever, but I am telling you that my lack of desire to watch such agenda-pushing riffraff has nothing to do with hatred of minority groups nearly as much with hatred of unrealistic diversity for the purposes of agenda-touting in my entertainment.", "660" ], [ "> then what would the point of starting his comment with that be?\n\nThe point is that he didn't spend 45 minutes crafting it for analysis like some kind of obsessively self-questioning coward, and was just typing the way that he would speak? \n\nPeople say this kind of shit all the time. They start with using a phrase they are loosely familiar with equating (e.g., \"liberals\" = \"democrats\" even if it's a misuse of the terms), before realizing they are with mixed company who would be more prone to taking the words literally, and so they clarify the intent. \n\n > Liberals -- well, California Democrats -- have no problem with high taxes, but... \n\nThis isn't to say that the majority of liberals in the world are Californian Democrats, or that they are the \"main flavor\" or any other kind of mental gymnastics you want to pull. What it means is that the person speaking started overgeneralizing, caught themselves midway, and gave a clarification to be more pointed with regards to whom they refer. \n\nWhat he said was: \n\n > Libleft, or specifically Orange left, holds numerous double standards \n\nHe literally clarified that he was talking about SJWs and not what LibLeft is _supposed_ to be, to which you replied that he \"thinks of LibLeft as a monolith\" which has to easily be the _most retarded_ take possible.", "965" ], [ "> You just argued for the filibuster and against gun rights at the same time?\n\nWhen did I argue for the filibuster? I said: \n\n > It sounds like you're a huge advocate of the filibuster, [...], let alone parties that could cockblock progress. \n\nI referred to the filibuster as \"cockblocking progress.\" You can't just say \"Oh, <PERSON> held all 3 parts of gov\" when shit like the filibuster exists or SCOTUS is as relatively unbiased as they are.\n\nAnd when did I say that I'm against gun rights? I am certainly against _the right to bear nuclear arms_ as a private citizen, however, considering I'm also against _the government's right_ to bear nuclear arms. What I said was that the founding fathers were living in antiquated times and what they thought was reasonable doesn't apply anymore.", "225" ], [ "> Like the process for ratifying the constitution\n\nConst amendments are _meant_ to be substantially harder to make than laws, though. I'd say the opposite: the fact that the founding fathers created a system where laws and const amendments were two separate things, and const amendments were intentionally designed to require a supermajority while laws were not, is good evidence that simple majority should rule. \n\n > except that you prefer faster change it sounds like? \n\nAll I'm saying is: if one party \"controls all 3 parts of government\" and then gets nothing done, that's really sad. \n\nI'd rather see people getting _more done_ so we have more to judge them on. \n\nI am an avid supporter of <PERSON>, and he was known as Dr. No. So it isn't to say I want everything to pass. But I want majority-driven stuff to pass. If it results in stuff we, as a country, dislike, then maybe people will vote differently. Or different voters will be incensed to start voting more. \n\n > Imagine if all of those checks and balances hadn't existed last year. <PERSON> would have simply declared himself the victor and made protesting illegal. \n\nThis is an extreme narrative to push. Congress would never have allowed this. I'm not saying that <PERSON> should've been supreme ruler. But I am saying that a bill should not need ~70% support to become a law. That's retarded. \n\n > On a smaller scale, imagine if the filibuster hadn't existed the last 4 years? \n\nBut that's _exactly it_. It shouldn't have. If GOP owned so much of the political power, they _should have been able to get shit done_. Even if it's shit that I disagree with. \n\nThe fact is that the more that Congress is unable to do its duties, the more executive growth we see as presidential overreach continues due to more and more executive orders. This is actually _against_ separation of powers. \n\n > The Dems need to either leave it alone or go all out securing voter freedom to make sure they stay in power. \n\nI am not a Dem. I still support the removal of the filibuster even when Dems control. \n\nI also support laws against Gerrymandering, _regardless_ of which party it benefits more (ahem, GOP to my knowledge). Fuck the bastards who ruin our country by cheating the system and prevent the _elected officials who control a majority_ from enacting the power that they are _supposed_ to have. \n\nYou shouldn't rely on broken garbage to fix other broken garbage. Two wrongs don't make a right. If the world is truly so screwed that the filibuster is the best option we have, then it's all so hopelessly screwed anyway.", "284" ], [ "You have me all wrong. If minorities are presented _as-is_, as human beings with human being problems, and their race/gender/etc are tertiary concerns that occasionally pepper into the story, it's just a part of their personality. \n\nBut if their race/gender/orientation is used IN LIEU OF a personality, that's just terrible writing. And _so often_ minorities are shoehorned into roles for no reason other than agendas. \n\n<PERSON>'s a normal guy who happens to be gay? No problem, as long as \"HELLLLLO~~~~~ I'M GAY!!!!!!\" isn't _basically_ his catchphrase. \n\nMain char is trans? And we don't find out.. until 2 seasons in? Because nobody makes a big deal out of it? \n\nAnd we're talking _passing_ trans, not \"I look and dress like one gender and make absolutely no effort, here are my personal pronouns\" trans? \n\nI can get behind that. That's not an agenda. That's a human being with a personality.... that happens to be trans, as a tertiary concern. \n\nBut when your show is just vapid, personalityless LGBT and other minorities taking up screentime with nothing to contribute to the show other than \"LOOK AT ME! WE'RE SOOO PROGRESSIVE!\", I already know what kind of show it's going to be.", "660" ], [ "> who used to be a part of this whole culture\n\nI don't think these new losers were ever a part of the culture. However, I do think that this is old. I'd like to just see this sub have a strict embargo against everything GME-related and current-WSB-related, or it'll just be the anti-WSB. \n\nAny more complaining than this over the next few days and I'd rather just make my own new WSB and just have rules like \"no bitching about WSB.\"", "255" ], [ "In all 4 quadrants, you have people who want differing degrees of regulation. \n\nBut my point was that the only people who don't want the ultra basic and obvious no-brain shit like a military or antitrust laws tend to just want anarchy. If the government isn't doing that shit, it literally has no other purpose to exist. I can't imagine many librights support having no antitrust issues unless they are literal anarchists. \n\nAlso, a libright who wants to live in indentured servitude to companies has as much in common with _libertarian_ ideals as SJWs do with libleft.", "627" ], [ "I'm sure anime was popularized or subsidized by the government for this reason. The idea that japan invented _cartoons_ solely because of PR is a bit of a stretch. People have been doodling and storytelling for literal millennia. \n\nTo be clear, I know that what you're saying is true when it comes to Japan's embracement of Kawaii Culture, and I know that anime plays a pivotal role _in_ Kawaii Culture. I'm just contesting that that is _why_ anime was created.", "709" ], [ "> To happen, yes. To persist, and to expand? No.\n\nOnce it happened, there was no stopping it. Accepting the initial good was the price you paid to get on the rollercoaster. After that, you were strapped in. \n\nThe propaganda was so thick and the brainwashing and intimidation so strong. For many people, you either became a murderer or a victim. Nazi soldiers had to be rotated out of concentration camps quickly to manage their suicide rates so high that they'd put modern-day Trans to shame. \n\nIf you actually think that nazism persisted because of some inherent evilness in the German people of that era, you're retarded.", "1009" ], [ "Extremist beliefs are unbased as fuck and basically never work, based on nothing other than \"most people will resist so hard that you fail even if the idea is great.\" \n\nBut I also think that centrists are lame as fuck. We're _mostly_ near the center. People should stop trying to pretend to be enlightened or somehow better than other people with uninterest. It isn't admirable to be so ignorant or unopinionated. And nobody is perfectly on the fucking grill at 0,0. \n\nHell, even the belief that _you should have the right to grill_ already puts you into a quadrant.", "965" ], [ "Not really. I can have 5 friends tell me how cool it is to suck dicks, and my reaction would be \"well, have at it man.\" Tons of people don't cave into peer pressure. \n\nBrainwashing, on the other hand, is done at an extremely young age and is reflected in all of society and all of the values you're taught. If you grow up watching your parents sucking dicks and they have you sucking your first dick by age 4, you're gonna keep sucking dicks.", "881" ], [ "Far libright is ancap territory, which is ironically not very lib at all because the only way to enforce anarchy is through authoritarianism of the populace, and the ultimate conclusion of completely unregulated free market capitalism is corporatism which is just slavery to companies instead of governments. \n\nUnironically \"if you go far enough lib, you need auth\" and \"if you go far enough right, you get auth.\"", "627" ], [ "I was something like +1 right -2 lib. \n\nI'd flair centerlib or centrist but I feel _very_ strongly about the capitalist and libertarian beliefs I have. My right to pursue my own goals is FAR more important to me than my belief that _some_ social safety nets help the overall economy. I.e, the things I _actively agree with_ are **necessary** for my way of life, while the things that I _just don't disagree with_ are **just beneficial** to how I think the world would be best off.", "627" ], [ "> Emphasis on \"they want\" ... if someone wants out .... let them out. \n\nRight. So if they want an authoritarian government that _doesn't_ let someone out, what you gonna do about it? lol \n\n > The only legitimate form of government, like a corporation, or even like the EU, has mechanisms for separation. \n\nYeah nobody gives a shit about your opinions on what is \"legitimate.\" People will make \"illegitimate\" forms of governments/corporations and you will be their slave. \n\nAnd if a single monopoly owns all of the food supply, you _do_ have a mechanism for separation: starve. \n\nThis is a very unbased and naive view of the world.", "593" ], [ "> forget grocery shopping\n\nAddressed it here: \n\n > subsidizing some shit like instacart for the elderly \n\nand \n\n > all grandpa's live alone and don't have any contact with younger members of family \n\nAddressed here: \n\n > having people over 60-70 isolate themselves \n\nYou can isolate in your own home from other people who live in the same home. \n\nI'm not sure that you're old enough to know what instacart is, but you are really making this sub live up to its reputation as being full of edgy teenagers. Please go back to r/politics until you're about 30. \n\n2% mortality, even if it were _across all demographics_ is not worth shutting down the entire economy for. We could've literally paid for old people's lives 100% during the ~9 months before the vaccine came out while letting the rest of the people work and it'd have cost us less money than the stimmies which were required due to outlawing work.", "801" ], [ "In US politics, it's more like you pick the side that you agree with 25% because the other side you only agree with 20%. \n\nAnyone in the US who just broadly thinks that one party is the perfect answer _probably_ did not reach that conclusion on their own, and is likely a huge extremist. \n\nThe two parties aren't even _intended_ to be internally consistent solutions for problems. They are _intended_ to each broadly speak to as many people as possible, even people who are inclined to have mutually exclusive viewpoints. Because having an opinion that 100 people find 30% agreeable is better than having an opinion that 30 people find 100% agreeable. \n\nThe parties are _literally not created to be self-consistent ideologies_.", "886" ], [ "For the first time in my life just the other day (I'm over 30), when reading about the black woman who was tweeting shit about \"white privilege\" before murdering her 3 year old adopted white girl, I read someone making a racist argument and did not immediately discount their opinion as \"racist trash.\" \n\nI don't remember what they said. Something relatively modest along the lines of \"if these people want racial divides, we should give them to them.\" Any other day of my life I'd just go \"naw fam, this ain't all black people, this ain't all minorities, this is one person.\" But for a split second in that moment, I did think \"Yeah, we should.\" \n\nI've put up with a lot of anti-white crap over my life and I consider myself to be an extremely logical person who wouldn't ever hold actions of one person against a larger group, but this SJW dumpster fire is getting so out of hand that _even I_ am starting to perceive it as tribal warfare. \n\nThat gives me staggeringly low amounts of hope for average people who are far more likely to resort to shit-slinging. Racism is coming back in a big fucking way.", "1020" ], [ "> So basically you're saying the whole compass is flawed. \n\nCorrect. I made it clear from my very first post when I said that far left and far right are both actually auth ideologies. I've said multiple times that far left is incompatible with libertarianism, as is far right (because it leads to corporatism, an authoritarian ideology). \n\nSorry if I've insulted your favorite 4-square metric for oversimplifying politics. This must be a huge eye-opener for you to realize that all issues cannot be contained into just four quadrants, and that up/down is not as mutually exclusive with left/right as you're pretending. \n\nStay woke, fam.", "285" ], [ "> My real quadrant takes the set of possible solutions created by combinations of the best elements of all quadrants. \n\nSo just like almost _literally everybody else_, except we own up to the slight degree to which we float into one quadrant over the others. \n\n > I don't give a shit about political ideology, I care about results. \n\nSo just like the vast majority of people on this sub. \n\nWhat a fucking snowflake. Almost everything you said comes across as 14 year old verysmart cringe. You think you're so fucking special because you came to a conclusion on your own? Utterly retarded. \n\n > Imagine being so insecure in your little flair wars that you can't handle someone having a moderate opinion. \n\nAll coming from my original comment where I said that virtually all of us are moderates and literally said \"**Extremist beliefs are unbased as fuck and basically never work**\" but cope harder with your pretend that I'm an extremist and you're the only guy smart enough to come up with your own \"real quadrant that takes a set of possible solutions worked out via quantum physics\" LOL \n\nI'm +1/-2 which is close as fuck to centrist. I have ideas from all 4 quadrants in my beliefs. But guess what? _Net result_ is that I am lib and right, so I flaired up appropriately and didn't pretend to create a new quadrant for my snowflake beliefs. \n\nDon't worry. It's pretty clear you're almost definitely a lib-something based on how special you think you are. Welcome to the crew.", "950" ], [ "I just tried to find a source on it, but I can't locate it. According to what I previously read for university like a decade ago, it was something like 35% UNTIL Nazi guards started being transferred. \n\nBasically you'd do a stint in the concentration camp OR in some other kind of gruesome murder position for like a month, and then you'd be transferred to something completely unrelated to that for like 3 months. It was set up this way to CURB the suicide rates from like 35% to like 8%. \n\nIIRC TIFO (Youtube Channel) also covered this at one point.", "1009" ], [ "Eh I've found sous vide steaks to be a little on the moist side, which means they don't sear easily, which means you need to dry them out first before searing _or_ sear them longer, which means you need to compensate for the internal temp when sous vide-ing them. \n\nEither way, we can all agree I hope that dry brining for AT LEAST 45 minutes prior to cooking is mandatory.", "740" ], [ "I don't disagree, but this isn't _just_ propaganda. It's actual people. People I have met IRL. People who I work with. Supervisors who otherwise I respected. \n\nI'm not about to join a cult, but it would hit me hard if my loved one joined a cult and I couldn't break them free. SJW wokeness is no better than a cult. \n\nThat's what I'm saying. The danger here isn't the intelligent people falling for wokeness, but the intelligent people being radicalized due to their anger in losing loved ones to it.", "811" ], [ "> One piece is not only ugly as sin \n\nWrong. \n\n > but far too long to possibly provide a return on time investment. \n\nOn the contrary, doing something for 10+ years gives you a large investment into something to the point where you can actively talk about it in a meaningful way for virtually your whole life. Watching rando 13 episode animes for 10 years ultimately results in you having absolutely nothing worth discussing or remember. They're all throw-away-able. \n\n > It has no place among entry level shows. \n\nThis is likely only true because of its incredible world-building would ruin many other animes for the viewer.", "243" ], [ "Every friend I've ever had smoked pot. Both of my parents smoke cigarettes. My father does a shitton of pot. Both of my parents drink -- my father, heavily. My friends were getting drunk at like age 14. To this day (30) I still don't drink and I've never smoked / smoke pot. \n\nI guarantee if society normalized smoking pot to the point of eating McDonalds, I would be someone who smokes pot. \n\nI never succumb to peer pressure or do shit _just_ because my friends do it. I am not so naive as to think this makes me immune to propaganda or cultural norm brainwashing. \n\nConsider this: I grew up in a society where showing people your private parts is considered indecent, and although I had many friends who thought it was funny to flash their balls (for whatever reason) I never just started flashing my balls, having always considered it indecent. \n\nThere are certain elements to _who I am_ that come out of society as a whole, part of being _brainwashed into this culture_. You can replace your friends if you disagree with them, and I often have if I found that my friends were doing shit that I had no interest in. You cannot replace society / the culture. \n\nFurthermore, there's a monumental difference between \"cmon bro suck dick it's fun just try it\" and growing up and seeing <PERSON> on TV sucking dicks as part of his normal Power Up routine. Propaganda is deep and wide-hitting and infects everything you see and everything you idolize. It's not as simple as someone just _encouraging you_ to do something; it's subliminal. You never feel pressured to do it. You just think all along that it was your own idea, your own thought. That's why it's _brainwashing_.", "568" ], [ "> So it should be reiterated: If they want racial divides, we definitely should oblige.\n\nYes. The people who want racial divides should absolutely get a racial divide, but I am dividing from them primarily because I think they are trash and have trash opinions.. just like I would towards anyone of any race if I think they have trash opinions. \n\nAvoiding innocent bystanders who have nothing to do with it is where the problem comes in.", "715" ], [ "My experience in BJJ is limited, but one thing I've seen in other areas of life is this: some people check their ego at the door when they're new, pick it up again when they've done enough to be proud of it, and turn it up to 11 when they're good. \n\nIt's possible that, for example, those BB's you mentioned were dickish before being whites, humble as fuck to purple, reasonably proud until black, and cranked it back up to dickish once they had enough accolades to justify it.", "331" ], [ "Not hitting women was not fundamental to <PERSON>. In the flashbacks, when <PERSON> said no hitting women, <PERSON> was all \"WTF why not?!\" Feeding those in need always seemed fundamental to <PERSON>, and I think it would be greatly out of character if he let someone starve to death, for example. \n\nCooking for commoners was due to his nature towards sharing food, not anything to do with being a gentleman and not hitting women. <PERSON> was all aboard the women-hitting train until <PERSON> told him not to do so and gave him some lame-ass sexist reason not to. \n\nAnd FWIW, people **do** often change things that are fundamental to them from when they were little kids. It's part of growing up. When under enough pressure, enough shit on the line, people betray their morals. That's what makes them interesting. <PERSON> is bordering on <PERSON> territory, which is really the only way his garbage character could be made any worse.", "942" ], [ "Am I the only idiot who doesn't understand what this means? \n\nAre these the qualities of a loyal boy? Even assuming he means loyal to his girlfriend... \n\n1. What does being on a computer and using some program have to do with loyalty? \n2. Why does having no notifications mean loyalty? I have notifications for calls/texts from parents, texts from male friends, app updates, push requests for 2FA, new emails from work or other things I'm subscribed to... \n3. How is xvideos of all things loyalty? If the point is \"I jerk off not cheat\" then.. okay.. but why not just have sex with your girlfriend? Or jerk off to xhamster? Or just not jerk off? Lots of men get sex enough that they don't need to jerk off.. \n4. This is the most puzzling of all. We ALL sleep. What does SLEEPING have to do with loyalty?", "901" ], [ "Is the implication here that you never ever argue or get jealous with somebody that is true love or something like this? \n\nSome people will get jealous/have trust issues due to their own history (eg, bad ex's who cheated or shitty parenting) and have nothing to do with the quality of a relationship. And if there's somebody in your life that you **never** argued with I'd be impressed. Even my best friend of ~15 years and I argue once every few months about something, and I only talk to him for a few hours every other day. \n\nI mean, maybe you got into this relationship where you've been married to your SO for 20 years and have never said a mean word and nobody was ever jealous, but not all people are you. You can absolutely have a functional relationship that's only good 99% of the time.", "813" ], [ "Stupid on so many levels. \n\n1. Facts can be incorrect. The only criteria to differentiate a fact from an opinion is whether or not it is objective. If something is objective (such as: I am 6'1\"), it is a fact. \"I am 6'3\" is wrong, because I am not, which makes it an incorrect fact. Facts can also be unknown (how tall am I? You didn't know) or unknowable (How tall was I when I was 7?). But that doesn't make them opinions. So you CAN argue with facts if you believe they are incorrect for some reason. \n2. People don't argue against correct facts. They argue against the **conclusions** people reach **based** on the facts. \n3. This guy says he **uses** facts, but then goes on to say you argue **with** facts. Just because you USE facts does not mean you ARE facts. That's like saying \"I ride a bicycle. You argue with me, you argue with bicycles. You argue with bicycles? You're a moron.\"", "414" ], [ "> he isn't smarter than <PERSON> just because he has a medical degree\n\nJust to be pedantic: knowing more about a subject doesn't make you smarter. I've known several people whose parents wanted them to go to med school so they did. Out of like 5 of them, 4 of them are pretty average and the last one is above-average but nothing genius-level. They all worked really hard (like 20 hour days) to pass. That hard work and determination is impressive, and I'd say they know more about medicine than me or this guy every single day of the week. \n\nBut are they smarter than someone who has a lot of natural talent/intellect but chose to become a butcher instead? \n\nOr what about someone who sucks at math/science but is a genius at navigating social situations charismatically? \n\nOr someone who sucks at all of the above but can paint a picture that brings people to tears? \n\nThere's just a lot of different types of intelligence, so I get where he's coming from with the attitude that \"just because they have a degree they are smarter.\" But their degree DOES show they KNOW MORE about this than you. \n\nAnd there's nothing wrong with that. I'm sure this Onision guy knows more about beating women than I do, and you don't see me trying to justify why that means he isn't smarter.", "723" ], [ "One of the biggest rules in pretty much all martial arts: don't fucking engage people who have weapons. \n\nMartial arts are really good... if you're 1v1'ing somebody and you're both unarmed. \n\nTo be fair, I'd rather be a badass Muay Thai legend against a guy with a pocketknife than NOT be a Muay Thai legend against a guy with a pocketknife, but I'd most of all rather be a speed sprinter legend against a guy with a pocketknife.", "357" ], [ "> Now this pose two problems:\n > It's unfair. Every other hero can damage a hero that is partially under cover. The hook 2.0 is the only weapon in the game that can't.\n > It's not enjoyable. One of the basic pleasure in a FPS game is to learn to aim, to work on that skill, so that you can hit the targets you see. This is completely cancelled by the hook 2.0. Now when you see an enemy partially behind cover, you're not sure if you can hit it with your hook or not. You have no visual indication whether you can hook him successfully or not. It's the same frustration that comes with lag when it doesn't favor the shooter: you aim perfectly at an enemy and your hit still don't register. \n\nTo which I say: \n\n1. Where do you get off talking about fairness? Shooting someone's leg from a mile away as _URL_0_ is not the same as hooking someone's leg from a mile away into a 1-shot. \n2. It's not enjoyable FOR YOU. Being hooked isn't enjoyable FOR THE VICTIM. \n\nIf hook 2.0 required every single pixel of the victim to be in LoS, I'd agree with you. But you're telling me that if you see a single pixel of theirs and your ENORMOUS/unskilled hook hits that pixel with its broken/unfair/unfun hitbox, that person deserves instagib? \n\nYeah. No.", "694" ], [ "> pressing dragonblade when your whole team died and betting on a 1vs4 instead of managing your ult \n\nThis is not high risk low reward. This is high risk high reward. IF you wipe them, you win the game and get awesome potg of you 1v4'ing. \n\nHigh risk low reward is like peeking out vs roadhog + widow so you can try to poke a rein shield.", "345" ], [ "Yeah. Or you can just not give a compliment. Compliments are tricky because some people don't respond well to them (\"ok\" \"not really\" \"lol\") and others respond but don't continue the conversation (\"thanks\" \"yeah\" \"kinda just a hobby\"). \n\nSo she's into waterfalls? Lots of pics of nature and you live in a place with a lot of hiking trails? Definitely into hiking. \n\n\"Hey! I saw your pictures of blah-blah falls. You ever see such-and-such place?\" \n\nNow you have a conversation going about something you have in common. If she says no, you can talk about the time you went (or how you've always wanted to go) and move towards other areas you've been to or that she's been to. If she says yes, you can talk about it (if you've been) or ask how if you should go (if you haven't been).", "432" ], [ "Is there something wrong with small talk suddenly? \n\nI was at Target the other day and the cashier said \"Long day\" at some point. I casually said \"You getting off soon?\" and he said \"Yeah, in about 20 minutes.\" I replied by saying \"Nice, man. Customers?\" and he said something like \"Isn't it always?\" I said \"Better them than co-workers. Customers leave, but co-workers you'll see again tomorrow.\" and he said \"Bit of both, I'm afraid.\" \n\nAfter I paid, I grabbed my bag and said \"Hope things get resolved, man. Have a good night.\" He gave a similar farewell as I walked away. Whole thing was rather pleasant and not a big deal. Never, at any point, felt like \"Wow! Fuck that guy! Being social.. Fuck.\"", "428" ], [ "Recent meme in reference to a thatHappened where a guy named <PERSON> gets expelled from school for pulling out his **raging** boner during a sex ed class to prove to a teacher that it's possible for a guy to piss with a boner (because the book she was reading said otherwise). \n\nThe OP more-or-less shrugged it off like \"Classic <PERSON>. The goofster! What a guy.\" So \"<PERSON>\" has become synonymous with \"Guy who does fucking ridiculous things socially but is still a lovable goofball.\"", "34" ], [ "Same rating area. Same experience. \n\nOnce every 5 games or so, my team decides nobody wants to play Rein in a payload map. About 80% of these games, we get absolutely crushed and cannot do anything. The other 20% of the time, it works surprisingly well (or they also don't have a Rein). I can only remember losing one game where the opponents didn't have a Rein, and it's because they swapped to a Rein after they started losing.", "197" ], [ "<PERSON>. <PERSON> heals up tanks like a monster, she can reach Dva when she's diving enemy snipers, she can 1v1 any hero in the game (sleep dart instagib vs 200 HP's, bionade is a 160 HP swing which leaves a scary debuff that makes enemies want to retreat). She's also got amazing protection by RH grips and/or Zarya bubbles and/or Defense Matrix, not to mention rein shield. Toss a Soldier in with her who can healing station for her and a <PERSON> whose passive heal is OP with her bionade.. there you go, the current meta.", "354" ], [ "> If you balance exclusively for competitive level play then the game becomes stale and repetitive at low levels because none of the complex heroes are viable when faced with the easy ones.\n\nThis is simply not true in any but the most extreme of scenarios. If they balanced for the top levels, over half of the roster would still be viable and/or fun for low-level players. It isn't like they'd need to reinvent the game. Small tweaks here or there with most heroes would do it. \n\nBalancing for the top-levels makes sense because skill differences can compensate for any disparity in low levels. A dude playing a char with a higher skill floor is likely to understand they appear to be underperforming because the character is hard and feel more investment into getting good. A person who knows they are casual are simply more likely to stick to easier heroes because that is more fun for them. \n\nOn the flipside, if the top is not balanced the game loses its competitive edge. Once its competitive edge fails, pros don't play/care. Once there are no pros, there are no semi-pro's aspiring to get better. Once the mid-level players are the best there are, they get bored and move on. And nobody wants to play a game where the best players are trash players. Games NEED a competitive element in order to keep a big enough playerbase to even attract the casuals in the first place. WoW's decline with Raid Finder and arenas is a pretty good example.", "197" ], [ "To be fair, OP was obviously talking about <PERSON> being imbalanced due to his 100% pickrate in any competitive play. <PERSON>'s response is a strawman that really just says Rein isn't that popular if you factor in the noncompetitive leagues and game modes. \n\nRein most assuredly is a ~100% pick in higher leagues and tournaments. Every single meta OW has ever had, barring KotH maps (ie, shit like double lucio double winston double tracer), has used Rein. \n\nSaying \"Oh but he's only played 20% of the time in QP and 0% of the time in Bronze!\" is useless.", "410" ], [ "> Bronze players matter. Different meta for different skill levels.\n\nNot for GAME BALANCE. Heroes should not be designed with the goal in mind of \"But what if players suck?\" \n\nYour example actually proves my point: your McCree/Soldier player's aim was too bad to kill <PERSON>, so you solved it by going <PERSON>. That's a good idea. Know what's NOT a good idea? Coming on the forums and saying \"<PERSON> is OP in bronze. Nerf <PERSON>!\" or even better: \"Soldier is not good enough in bronze, buff soldier!\" (consider: Soldier is the most-picked DPS hero atm and is only looking to be stronger next patch with the triple-tank/Dva nerfs). \n\nThe game should not be balanced by the devs to cater to Bronze players, because Bronze players already have options to fix the imbalances: improve their own skills (what the soldier/mccree could've done) or switch to different heroes that don't require those skills (what you did). \n\nIt should be balanced by devs to cater to GM/Tournament players, because imbalances encountered by these players **have no solution outside of developers balancing for them**.", "884" ], [ "I was a national-level SSBM player when the game was relevant (2005) maining <PERSON> (who was like rank #4 at the time, no idea about now but I've heard she's dropped in the tier listings). Nobody I ever met thought the game would have been worse if characters were buffed/nerfed for top-tier levels of play. \n\nIf suddenly Nintendo had released a patch to SSBM that made <PERSON> not total dogshit at the top levels of play, for example, I can't imagine anyone would have been upset. \n\nOn the other hand, if L-canceling and wavedashing and shit were all removed as \"bug fixes\" to remove skill from the game and cater to low-level players, the game wouldn't still be alive. \n\nMelee is still alive because of the exact thing you're arguing against: players pursued rewarding high-skill gameplay. \n\nAnd FWIW, having an 8-character cast in a 26 character game is a HUGE amount of options if you're only picking 1 hero. Having an 8 character cast in a ~23 character game when your teams are 6v6 is fucking embarrassing by comparison. \n\nAnd SSBM is a solo game. If you want to pick <PERSON> to try to become \"the best <PERSON> in the world\" people will still respect that and pay respect to your Pichu skills. In OW, if you exclusively play Bastion to become the best <PERSON> in the world, people are going to take a dump on you every single game until you want to uninstall.", "410" ], [ "Except they make up the most important portion of the playerbase. Casual players don't give a fuck about balance since they just want fun. Competitive players care about balance because they want to move UP. All players eventually want to go up as far as they can. \n\nKnowing that the only thing holding you back is your personal skill is **vital** to the belief that you can improve. If you stop thinking that and instead think that bad game design/balance is what's holding you back, the game becomes anti-competitive, unfun, and poisonous. \n\nFurthermore, if a game is too poorly balanced, the pro scene withers. Without a pro scene, the semi-pro scene dies next. Without any \"godlike\" players there to inspire the mere mortals into trying to make sick plays of their own, the entire game falls apart and only the most casual or dedicated players remain. We saw this with WoW raiding. \n\nOn the other side of the coin, if you make EVERYTHING too difficult/skill-based to have any fun with outside of the highest levels, the game has the opposite problem: the worst players quit. This creates a toxic environment for new players, since everyone is so much better than them. It also forces people down the Elo curve, so players who have worked hard are still bronze or silver and feel bad. These players then quit, which forces even better players down to bronze/silver and demoralizes them into quitting as well. Before long, you end up with a game that ONLY has a pro scene. This can be seen to some degree in WoW arenas and SC2. \n\nNeither is good, but balancing for pro players while ensuring fun for low players is the best combination. \n\nExample: Bastion is OP to noobs and garbage to pros. Buffing his HP would just make him even more OP to noobs. Nerfing his HP would just make him even more garbage to pros. But giving him a buff to his recon mode wouldn't affect why he's OP to noobs while it would remedy part of why he's garbage to pros.", "197" ], [ "If things are balanced for pros, they're balanced for everyone. \n\nIf mccree vs pharah is balanced for pros, and you're bad at mccree, you're going to lose to pharah. But that's okay, because you can think \"I'm just bad at mccree/aiming. I can do better.\" Or you can just swap torb to remove aiming from the equation. \n\nBut if you instead demand that your bad aiming is a reason to buff mccree or nerf pharah, that just either makes mccree a 100% pick at high levels or pharah a 0% pick at high levels, both of which are unhealthy for the game. \n\nBalancing for pros leaves low-level balance up to the responsibility of the player to improve their own skills. Balancing for noobs creates a toxic game where certain heroes are must-picks and others are 0% picks, which trickles down to low-level players as well when they are pressured to conform to a meta they don't even understand (eg, why low level players are often forced into playing <PERSON> despite her being difficult to play).", "197" ], [ "> The problem is if they nerf <PERSON> down to the point that he's \"balanced for comp\" you might not have hardly anyone playing him in the lower levels.\n\nAnd what's wrong with this? I personally find Reinhardt gameplay to be more boring than non-Reinhardt gameplay. If bronze players never used <PERSON> because he was unfun and not good enough to them, then that'd be totally fine and they'd have a fun game. As they progressed through the ranks, they'd find some people who like Rein's gameplay (shocker: these people do exist) and they will see that those games play out differently and the game actually has a lot of depth.", "884" ], [ "Really? If someone told me they had a shitty back, I'd ask them what happened. Maybe they have some cool story about rock climbing or BJJ or something. If they said they got it from a motorcycle accident, I'd mention about how my father has a shitty hip from a drunken waterskiing accident from when he was 18. That kind of shit sticks with you as you get older -- heals when young, but still painful as fuck when you're 60 I'm told. \n\nAnd if it was just really boring. \"Arthritis. I'm old and so my back sucks.\" I'd just be like \"Sucks dude.\" I mean, I've met boring conversationalists everywhere... Not going to fault them for it. \n\nI don't mind the socializing.", "98" ], [ "The rule of thumb is that Ana is just much better. Better anti-flanker, better burst healing, better aoe healing, better offensively, sleep dart shuts down ults, her ult is superfast and her ability to ult a tank to turn it into a DPS God is one of the things that makes 3tanking viable without being short on DPS. \n\nIs Mercy *viable*? What SR we talking? I am SR 3300 and still see some Mercy and have played Mercy in some of my games to great effect. In fact, I'd say at my SR I'd **almost always** rather see a Mercy than an Ana, because very rarely are the Ana's good enough to justify them. They usually kinda suck, because Ana can be difficult to play.", "476" ], [ "You're missing my point. You say \"compliant monitoring software\" like this is a thing. What kind of software do you mean? \n\nThe only \"monitoring\" software that exists for this type of thing is signature-based detection -- refer to my last post. \n\nEven if I humor you and we assume that perfect \"compliant monitoring software\" (AKA \"anti-cheat software\") exists, and it's heuristic/analytic-based instead of signature-based... It still wouldn't work. \n\nWhy? Ultimately, the client has complete control of their software. Nothing is stopping a hacker from writing a code that makes the game *think* that there's anti-cheat software running when there really isn't. \n\nGame hacking (/clientside hacking in general) is a real problem for all areas of security (including program development, mobile app development, and even shit like ATMs). It's possible for PC Bangs to tighten up their security and not give customers a bunch of access that would be required to disable or override system stuff to run new cheats, but that'd probably disrupt other areas of their business model (not to mention it might cost a lot, and it would give them attack surface and maintenance fees as hackers/kids continuously find ways to bypass their sandboxing). \n\nAnd OS \"limitations\" for Windows are laughably bypassable for a huge number of reasons. You can take a \"kiosk\"-style Win7 machine and get full admin access on it within minutes by knowing some basic tricks any kid could learn. \n\nBusiness model changes or stuff like forcing PC Bang-Only Servers are much better options.", "496" ], [ "> Melee is a hard game to play professionally, two types of Melee players, those that can play Melee and those that can't and no one is putting money on a match between two players that can't\n\nI played melee \"professionally\" (insofar that, in 2005, when I was 15, I had a local LAN Center sponsor me and pay for me to represent them in tournamants, as recompense I got to play/eat there for free). \n\nA few times we had people show up from a few states away (as far as Vermont - I was in PA) to play with us (me/other guys who were also national-level players), but I never saw anyone make any kind of wager anywhere NEAR $800 on us. Holy christ.", "286" ], [ "It isn't just commas, punctuations, or other words to indicate breaks in a sentence, clause, or phrase, it's actually lists, arrays, or collections of items and other such words to indicate enumeration, and, quite frankly, I am disappointed, disgusted, and revolted that I've had to take my valuable time, effort, and energy to clarify for, explain to, and educate you about this topic, matter, and/or issue.", "251" ], [ "I tell my girlfriend that I think she looks a lot better without makeup, or with only light makeup. \n\nFor the record, /r/brag shit time, she's a total 12/10 and I'm like a 6-7/10 at best. Guys are going to think she's insanely hot and flirt with her regardless. I just think that makeup makes her look worse. \n\nSo disliking makeup on women is not necessarily a manipulative ploy designed solely to ensure you have no competition. I already don't have any idea why she likes me in the first place so it must be that kind of insanity love I've been hearing so much about, which means I have no competition anyway!", "378" ], [ "> They like makeup. Almost everyone likes makeup if it is done well.\n\nSeems like an overgeneralization (even with the word \"almost\"). I like eyeliner and eyebrow stuff and foundation is okay, but REALLY hate blush, lipstick, eyeshadow, etc. I tell my girlfriend I like her makeup light (or not at all - she does actually have nearly flawless skin and wearing no eye makeup highlights her asian eyes, which I am personally attracted to). \n\nI think there is a lot of overgeneralizing/overthinking it going on. A guy liking his girlfriend's \"plain\" look does not mean he is trying to enslave her with his unending charm.", "489" ], [ "> They can be a burden on society, they just shouldn't get help.\n\nIf they aren't getting help, they aren't being a burden. \n\nBut we live in a world where they do get help and _are_ a burden, and thus it _is_ my call. \n\n > And they almost are never \"burdens on society\" no matter how much they eat or drink. \n\nKey word: \"almost.\" People shouldn't be allowed to make me foot the bill for them ruining their bodies. It's all or nothing. \n\n > I never said it needed to be 12. \n\nYou never gave a reason why it should be any number. I gave a reason: if science says people are permanently injuring themselves by doing it under a certain age, then that should be the age. That's better than your \"fee fees\" (to use your own terminology) answer, and there's economic reasoning for it. \n\n > And fwiw the age of consent needs to be lower than 18 to match the age of majority for trials and the age of driving. \n\nYou already agreed that the age of driving does not need to match the age of majority, since the age of driving puts other people in danger. I think you've gotten so wrapped up in trying to be right that you can't even remember your own claims anymore.", "70" ], [ "> Great to hear - keep that liquidation as far away as possible!\n\nNo I am actually getting _closer_ to liquidation. By averaging up my sell basis, I'm basically taking out newer shorts at higher numbers. Taking more shorts means that my debt ratio is increasing. I can't keep this up forever. \n\nIf I don't take any more shorts out, I will get liquidated around ~$15 Nano. If I keep taking more shorts out at the rate I have been, I will be liquidated around ~$10 Nano. \n\nHowever, by averaging up my sell basis, I am also dragging up my breakeven point. If I never took out more shorts, my liquidation point might have been ~$15 but my breakeven would've been ~$6.70. As the price goes up, my liquidation is moving down towards $10 but my break-even if moving up towards ~$7.00. \n\nI just need Nano to do normal crypto shit and dip at basically any point before $10. It doesn't need to be a massive 30% drop. A simple ~10% retrace down to yesterday's price would be more than enough. If we saw Nano retrace to $6.40 (where it sat yesterday for like 5+ hours), I would be up like 20%.", "928" ], [ "IMO it's unresolved. I question if <PERSON> was paying enough attention or anticipating the teleport. If <PERSON> knew a teleport was incoming, could he have used haki to have prevented it by \"willing himself to stay in place\"? Haki requires active use.. It isn't just a constant, invisible barrier of armor that is active 24 hours a day. \n\nFuture prediction would come in for this. \n\nFor example, why couldn't <PERSON> just haki Gamma Knife? Either his haki was actually _lower_ or haki is not capable of stopping all physical attacks. We've seen Law GK even higher haki targets successfully before, too. The rules aren't entirely clear.", "708" ], [ "> good to know alternative ways to handle short positions when price moves up.\n\nIt's just the inverse of \"buying the dip.\" You know how you might buy Nano, it moves against you (down) so you buy more to lower your cost basis? Exact same principle. You short Nano, it moves against you (up) so you short more to increase your sell basis. \n\n > For you, hopefully we hit $8.1 and drop back down to $7 (15% retracement is nothing for NANO after a breakout) \n\nAgreed. Would be very solid. In fact, I shorted more at $7.60 and then closed the short position at $7.30. This brings up my cost sell basis while simultaneously limiting my exposure to more upside risk. I got the Nano back to re-sell it, should we return to $7.60 or $8.00 or beyond. If it keeps going down, I'll miss out on some potential profits (from the $7.60 shorting) BUT my existing shorts will move closer to being in-the-money. \n\nAlso I've exhausted KuCoin's Nano lending. There's no more Nano to be lent on it, so it's important for me to be liquid with the Nano I've borrowed (locking in profits where I can) so that I can free it up for more selling should the price rocket upward more. \n\nIf the price continues to bounce in a horizontal grid, doing this will also eventually pull my sell basis _into_ that grid, allowing me to escape the short position without losses.", "928" ], [ "I think that's smart. And that's the beauty of trading. We can set ourselves up for winning plays if shit moves in our favor, while taking minor haircuts if it doesn't. If you just HODL, you will reap the rewards when it moves in your favor and get assplowed when it moves against you. \n\nI've already accepted that I rarely outperform a bull market with trading (VS just hodling) until the moment comes where there's a downswing that keeps going down. Up until that point, I'm down like 10-15% below a holder (usually). After that point, I'm often like +700% over a holder.", "937" ], [ "Ironically fucking yes. Which is not my intention. I have just been incredibly good at timing the tops of peaks when I start shorting, and incredibly greedy with waiting for dips to buy back into a long position. \n\nLike 3 times now I have almost entered long positions and decided \"In 30 cents\" only to have it reverse just before. $4.61 when it bottomed out at $4.90, for example. \n\nI keep entering short positions just to increase my sell basis of previous trades, and accidentally just keep hitting the peaks and cashing out of those short positions to hedge against run-away prices (and have more short ammo for later, since I have actually taken ALL of the lended Nano on KuCoin currently). \n\nThe net result is that I sold out half of my trading stack at $4, and despite never having bought it back, I am just about neutral compared to having held since then (despite the price going up by 75%...) \n\nEDIT: Oh I didn't realize what context you were replying to. \n\nIt isn't that I _generally_ make more money shorting than longing. It's that \"HODL\" is a strategy that only pays out in one direction (when the price is moving up). If you are actively trading, you can capture the gains of huge dips (or at least not be ENTIRELY rimmed by them) while paying only a haircut in most cases compared to holding.", "928" ], [ "> The “regardless of the factual truth” is where you lost me. \n > ...\n > However if they’re right about some of it that makes me feel I have to engage with the argument. \n\nI don't think of an insult like criticism. If someone tells me that I suck at basket weaving, my attitude is like \"Yeah I do.\" Because I don't care. I don't practice it. \n\nIf someone tells me I'm bad at something I'm good at, either they're full of shit (not factual truth) or they have a valid criticism. A criticism is not an insult. \"You are overextending\" is not the same as \"You are a dumbass.\" \n\n > If you can’t you become stagnant, and stagnation is just a living death \n\nAlso, rarely are other people capable of giving valid criticism. They either: \n\n1. Cannot see why you made a mistake due to something out of your control. Consider in team games how often it seems like someone \"is not doing anything\" when in fact they are just in a bad situation because SOME OTHER teammate is not doing anything. \n2. Cannot properly articulate your flaws to you in a way that is constructive or actionable. \n3. Have an awful signal-to-noise ratio (1 valid criticism per 500 bad ones = drowned out). \n\nFor all of these reasons (and more), if you really care about self-improvement, you need to be your own worst critic. \n\nAnd once you've reamed your fucking asshole about how awful you are because you made a tiny mistake, and then set yourself out to improve so that you can have skills that you are proud of - again and again for literal decades - you will be _even less_ impressed when some nobody who has never accomplished anything tries throwing some insults at your face about whatever bullshit they are trying to peddle.", "414" ], [ "> If shrugging off insults and demeaning acts was that easy the world would be a different place.\n\nIt _is_ that easy. It just isn't that easy _for everyone_. \n\n > It's disheartening and downright stressful to be constantly bombarded with hate and vitriol, especially if you are having a hard time fitting into a community as a minority or immigrant. \n\nNo offense, but nobody I've ever seen claiming to be \"bombarded with hate and vitriol\" that was _actually_ bombarded with hate and vitriol. They are typically just facing down thousands of imagined slights, such as microaggressions. \n\n > I get that you're just bragging about how tough and thick skinned you are \n\nOr I'm just stating how I'm different. What, do you think that the rules of the internet are either \"wallow in self pity\" or \"bragging?\" \n\n > but it really goes to show that you lack empathy for your fellow man. \n\nTolerating people's bullshit isn't empathy. You know nothing about me. If anything, you're just an ignoramus who thinks that people have to think _exactly_ like you or they must have no empathy. I can appreciate the fact that there exist weak people in this world, but at least I have the wherewithal to call a spade a spade. \n\nNothing wrong with being weak, but also nothing wrong with getting a little perspective. And there's a reason why the world doesn't stop and wait for you to catch up, despite all of the virtue signalling about how great it is to be empathetic to every loser that is wasting their life away overstressing about imagined problems.", "16" ], [ "Shorting and taking profits are directly related. Price is too high - > short - > price falls - > you buy back - > profit. \n\nLOL @ thinking I'm being disingenuous with the rule. The rule is simple, `No discouraging trading.` It provides a host of examples. Shorting is a part of trading. Referring to shorting as \"hating the community\" is most definitely discouraging trading. \n\nAnd oh, okay. I am glad that you clarified it was a joke. Upon retrospect, I can now tell that it was actually a very funny and humorous joke that you told. Ha ha. Thank you for explaining it. Very high quality. Appreciate you helping me get my sense of humor up to your level.", "937" ], [ "> Ooh, you don't interact with them so they don't exist.\n\nDo you have a reading disorder? I never said that people do not exist who are bombarded with hate and vitriol. What I said was \"nobody I've ever seen < ... > was actually < ... > .\" You can't even argue against that; you don't know what I've seen. Your desire to argue against it despite me speaking to my own _personal_ life experiences shows two things: (1) you have an agenda so you're ignoring indisputable facts, and (2) you have nowhere near as much empathy as you claim you do. \n\n > like I was getting at you don't seem to be the type to actually get to know others and put yourself in their shoes. \n\nAgain, you do not know me. \n\n > For you I'm sure it's enough to look at some extreme examples on Twitter and apply them to wide swaths of the general public. \n\nWhen did I apply extreme examples on Twitter to the general public? I applied extreme examples on Twitter to _the general Twitter community_, which is a much more fair comparison. \n\n > After all, if it doesn't affect you directly no use truly understanding it right? \n\nOn the contrary, Twitter SJW's that are stirring up cancel culture nonsense does affect me directly. Their particular brand of authoritarianism is a detestable thought-terminating ideology wrapped up in a much more palatable \"social justice\" package. It's hard to argue with somebody when their primary argument is \"You are an evil human being who deserves to be terminated if you disagree with me.\" \n\n > I don't have to know you personally to recognize you're spitting the same bullshit many a macho ass likes to spit. \n\nHere you go, after railing on me for generalizing people on Twitter, you would assign some generalizations to me despite admitting you don't know me. \n\nYou know, there's a fundamental difference between us. I am willing to say \"Yes. Though perhaps flawed, the statistics indicate that black people commit more violent crime.\" but I won't assume ill of any _particular_ black gentleman. I.e., I won't assume ill of any _particular_ Twitter user, despite believing that there's a _general trend_ that they are SJW's. You, however, are willing to take generalizations and apply them _to the individual_. Not a good look, and it makes you no better than the Twitter users to which I refer. \n\n > \"You're just a weakling if you can't easily shrug off hate speech, being demeaned and belittled by your neighbors, being treated as subhuman.\" \n\nA typical SJW tactic, that, to put some strawman into quotes and act as if the other person said it. What I said was simple: I shrug off all insults, whether they are factually correct or not, because I am prideful enough to believe that someone is trash for trying to insult me. \n\nI never: \n\n1. Criticized people who were unable to do so _for being unable to do so_. \n2. Said I was better than other people for being able to do so. \n3. Indicated that the way I am is even \"right,\" simply that it is _how I am_ and that _I like it_. In fact, my post opened up with as much: \n\n > **This is such a fundamental difference in people.** \n\nThe very first words of my post. \n\nI obviously struck a nerve and hit you rather close to home. Perhaps with my concluding remarks, that there is a strong overlap between the two groups [(1) people who can't let go perceived slights and (2) SJWs who fight for perceived injustice where none exists] is what triggered you. \n\nAt the end of the day, however, remember: as I stated in my first post, I am prideful. It is a double-edged sword that has cost me things in my life, but one of the things it has shielded me from is _taking offense_. The user to which I responded said that they would take insult from someone who was trying to insult them \"simply because they were trying to be insulting\" (paraphrase). My key point here is that I would never take an insult from someone _trying_ to insult me. It only points to their insecurities that they would try. \n\nAnd I see plenty of insecurities right now. Believe me.", "16" ], [ "> Yeah because accusing you of hating an entire community because you made a few quick bucks is the more rational take...\n > \n > You nailed it. \n\nI don't disagree with you. If I knew you and we were boyz I would've just assumed it was a joke, for sure. \n\nBut just to give you some context from my PoV: people were hating on shorts in r/WSB recently over the GME thing, actually believing that shorts were \"legitimately bad people\" that were \"trying to manipulate the market.\" \n\nSo when I checked this thread and saw \"why do you hate the community?\" on a post I made that was sitting at like -5 (because some people in the community truly _were_ apparently displeased that I'd short their favorite coin), I figured you were serious and speaking on behalf of those who were actually upset about it. \n\nCouple that with a _lot_ of people who complain about traders (I remove dozens of posts per day of people saying things like \"guys! stop trading! just HODL your coin and we can ALL get more money!!!\") and I figured it was just one of those generic \"shame on you for trying to make money!!\" posts. \n\nI wasn't trying to be disingenuous with the rules or start flexing some authority or some shit. I'm never like that. I try to be as libertarian as possible here with people and I don't mind people giving me shit. I just misunderstood your intention. \n\nSorry about that.", "96" ], [ "> Whether or not you were taught how to use a search engine in school I think really is the turning point.\n\nI was never taught how to use a search engine. Born in 90. My computers in schools were for, at most, learning to use word/excel/make a powerpoint. \n\nI think that pre-2000 was still too young, maybe even pre-2005 might be too young, for growing up with shit like coding. I had to self-teach. Nowadays I think some coding languages should be taught as young as elementary school tbh.", "704" ], [ "> You're the guy that everyone used to listen to for trading advice on this sub a few years ago, right?\n\nIndeed, though I wouldn't listen to me lately, [apparently my hand is not so hot](_URL_1_) LOL. That trade caused me to have to short more and more until I ate up literally all of the Nano lending KuCoin offered in shorting up my sell basis so that I could get back to break-even. I finally escaped the trades when, yesterday, I threw the last of KuCoin's lent Nano into sales at $7.60 and bought them back up last night at $6.90 along with some margin buys. \n\nI am still really active on the sub. Maybe you just missed me around -- there was also [this whole thing last week](_URL_0_) that I was at the center of, but that was the _other_ sub that we don't talk about here. Yuck.", "928" ], [ "It's still both. I don't have nearly as much vitriol as <PERSON> does, but I get it. <PERSON> knows what he's doing and he revels in it. He enjoys the chaos, even if it means people end up homeless. \n\nI can't blame him. I also enjoy the chaos. People are ultimately responsible for their own actions; he can't help that they follow him like a cult. A shame, though, for such a great visionary to not think up better positions for his pawns. \n\nPerhaps that is the ultimate arrogance, when the king decides he no longer benefits from having pawns at all. Then again, perhaps he doesn't.", "874" ], [ "I'd advise caution with this. Trading out at $7.50 is tempting, but look earlier in the chart and imagine cashing out at $4.50 or so. Splat. Never went back. \n\nBut I'm not a cautious guy, so I'd advise being ready to short in conjunction with this. \n\nSell at $7.50. Totally. But if the price exceeds $8.50, just short more to increase your sell basis. If the price hit $9.50, just short more to increase it even further. As long as it retraces to the ~$7.50 you're expecting, the shorts will print out big. If it ends up stabilizing around like $8.50, you'd at least be ~breakeven. \n\nSame way you could fix a theoretical $4.50 sell. You could just short at $5.50 and later at $6.50 and then there were like 3 separate distinct occasions to break-even at $5.50. VS no shorting where you would've just been guaranteed to buy back in at a burn.", "511" ], [ "> Nothing wrong with just boomer holding if you don't want to pay attention to your portfolio all day and just make some passive income to match inflation.\n\nEven at this, I disagree. \n\nIf you want to put $500 into an ETF and have it get 5% returns in a year, but have a separate option to just put the $500 to buy a CSP in that ETF at a 1-10% discount which will yield 1% in a week, why NOT DO IT? \n\nIf you get assigned, you get the ETF you wanted to purchase at a 1-10% discount. You don't need to wheel it. You don't need to think about it. You don't need to touch it. You literally just purchased the ETF you were planning on purchasing-and-forgetting, but at at a 10% discount. \n\nIf you don't get assigned, you just do the same shit again next week. And the week after that. And the week after that. And the week after that. UNTIL you get assigned. \n\nIn this way, you get your 1% gains per week every week (which is like 70% annualized) or (far more likely) you get assigned before long and get the ETF you wanted at a 10% discount. \n\nBuying a security basically never makes any sense. Even for the least fucking volatile stocks imaginable (boomer ass MSFT): $240.95 share price, 19.5% IV, you can sell a CSP FD for next Friday (so 7DTE) for $2.40. Either you're getting a ~1.3% discount on the share or you're getting a ~1% weekly ROI. \n\nAnd that's fucking MSFT. With a 19.5% fucking IV. The only way you get fucked here is if you do this and then MSFT goes up by like 20% in one week and you missed out on some gains. But that _statistically_ is not the average, or else MSFT would be outpacing 70% YoY ROI.", "597" ], [ "I didn't say wheel. I just said CSP for the purpose of buying. \n\nYou can find CSP's where there are two possibilities: get the stock at a 10% discount (assigned) or make 5-10% ROI _on the week_ (not assigned). You don't need to understand shit for this. You sell the CSP and both options are great. Takes like 3 seconds per week. \n\n_If you were planning on buying it for a long-term <PERSON> hold anyway_, then CSP's can't go wrong.", "511" ], [ "I think the person you are referring to is one of those \"Look, I am very educated for reading books\" kinds of guys. \n\nI have seen people unfavorably compare OP to Wheel of Time, for example, holding it up as the epitome of perfection with absolutely no faffery despite a solid 3 books (4-6) dedicated to _<PERSON>'s fucking legs_. \n\nAnd while I would say that it's a more mature story, there is a certain genius that is required to be able to weave family-friendly content into a setting that also has shit like Impel Down and slavery. Some of the scenes we'd seen in Sabaody (first time) were inhuman, particularly vis-a-vis the celestial dragons and our first impressions of them. \n\nAnd _less fantastical / psychological elements_, such as <PERSON>'s mental break after being imprisoned in the cage for a while, hold no candle to watching <PERSON>'s slow mental degradation due to living alone on his old crew's ship for 50 years, staying alive only for <PERSON>, and struggling to maintain his sanity by leaning against walls and noticing that he was exactly 45 degrees. \n\nOne piece has a lot of powerful writing. <PERSON> is not less accomplished than those other authors in their respective mediums; he is more than most and rivaled by few. \n\nAnd I say that, even including everything I hate about OP (e.g. <PERSON>).", "1010" ], [ "> All I really can say is that those three were written with the specific purpose of allowing interpretation and conveying specific messages that the author felt are important to the world at large, whereas One Piece started out simply as a story that <PERSON> wanted to tell.\n\nIMO, it shows more mastery to write something _for entertainment_ and weave in important political and other thematic points than it is to write something that has a certain meaning to it from the get-go. \n\nLike, I wouldn't say that a math textbook is particularly more deep than OP, despite it being written for an extremely concise educational purpose.", "1010" ], [ "People will downvote this, but I agree. Anything can be symbolic and deep if you are willing to include stuff that was unintentional. At the very least, praising the depth of the medium/author is unwarranted.. it's the depth of the audience member who is reading into so much. \n\nSymbolism and metaphor and shit that is _intended_ and even _poetic_ within its medium, on the other hand, is different. \n\nI do think that <PERSON> holds Wado in his mouth because it is his beloved sword, but not for the reasons that the OP claims. If it were just about strength, <PERSON> would've held that honor at some point.", "498" ], [ "For higher numbers, you can sell stocks you own and open up more CSP's. \n\nE.g., if you own enough to purchase 80 shares, just sell 20 to open up a CSP. This will perform better against SPY compared to a wheel because (1) covered calls don't pay as much premium as CSP's and (2) covered calls give the wheel _upside_ risk (which is the bigger risk for SPY). \n\nBut admittedly SPX is the absolutely worst thing to do this on. The shit has like 11% IV and a rather hefty contract price. \n\nConsider $OGIG. In the past year it went up over 100% (VS SPY's 10%). During last year's march downturn it fell from ~$30 to ~$20 (33%), VS SPY falling from ~3.3k to ~2.2k (basically same). \n\nPrice tag of $6k for a contract instead of $40k. \n\nNothing's gonna be \"perfect\" but my point is that going _full retard risk averse_ with 100% of investments is pretty retarded. There's lots of money laying around, even in safe plays like just buying & holding stock, that you can unlock by just buying CSP's before holding.", "511" ], [ "Yes. <PERSON>'s survival undermined all of the drama leading up to it (several chapters / about a dozen anime episodes). It kills rewatchability of that entire part of the series. \n\nAlso, it didn't fit _in the story_. I'm not advocating for just killing a char for the sake of the DrAaAaAmAaAaa~. It was written artistically beautifully -- the way his statue fell over, his whole monologue leading up to it about how it was _his duty_... There was this huge conflict between <PERSON> and <PERSON> on their way to Raindance where <PERSON> basically sat on the ground and said \"Yeah, I'm not gonna help anymore. I'm done.\" \n\n<PERSON> started smacking the shit out of him, and he made it a whole thing about how she had to _put other people's lives on the line_. How people were _willing to sacrifice themselves for her_, and how it was _her duty as a leader_ to be willing to let some people die in order to secure peace for her kingdom. It was an important growing moment for her... Really no less powerful than the scene a few arcs before where <PERSON> almost fought with the residents of Drum Island and <PERSON> straight-up told him \"You aren't fit to be a leader\" before bowing her head to ask the residents for their help in saving <PERSON>. \n\nThere were just so many story threads coming together for that moment. <PERSON>'s growth, <PERSON>'s duty, his monologue, the tension building up over like 5+ chapters about how this bomb was going to blow, the sacrifice. All of it. And it was all just washed away with \"huh, weird seeing my own grave.. lol.\" \n\nThe worst part was that there was _no reason_ to do it. <PERSON> didn't play an intricate part in the future story. His survival is meaningless. He might as well be dead at this point. But it completely kills the re-readability and story flow. The tension feels fake, the conclusion feels cheated, <PERSON> feels deprived of growth and <PERSON> feels robbed of having completed his duty. The entire \"drama\" and \"conflict\" around that part of the story is almost downright cringy to rewatch/reread when you know what's going to happen. It changes \"the buildup to a necessary sacrifice\" into \"faffing around before a copout.\" \n\nTruly a huge failure on <PERSON>'s part there. And he's made a handful of other mistakes in the series as well. But he's still incredible and OP works on so many levels despite the small flaws.", "13" ], [ "> Find in the sub description where it says this is a meme sub.\n\nIt's definitely a meme sub. It's supposed to be the old-school WSB of crypto in here. \n\nThere's a reason why I remove all posts to _other_ meme subs. They're just imitators. \n\nWSBGuy was around for ages.. long before GME garbage. But yes, even I would be hesitant to make him our mascot _given_ the GME garbage. \n\nOld WSB _as a culture_ is everything we should be. Looking out for money, willing to do retarded shit for it, and occasionally accidentally changing the world in the process. All without politics and PC shit.", "434" ], [ "I've got all of the lent Nano on KuCoin just held in my account. I'm paying small interest on it just so that nobody else can have it. When I need it, I need it and I don't want there to be none left. \n\nAnd my position on Nano is actually currently _long_, so I know that nobody is shorting with meaningful amounts of KuCoin lent Nano.", "831" ], [ "> Now if only Orb would close out his leveraged short position and let the price go 😉\n\nI mentioned it in another comment (ironically, to you) but for anyone else reading: I did close out my short position. I exhausted all of KuCoin's shortable Nano yesterday at $7.60 and then bought in this morning at $6.90 with all of it + my trading stack + more on margin. I have a long position now and all of the shorting ended up breaking me even from my original sale @ $4. \n\nI also am still holding all of the shortable Nano on KuCoin and just paying interest on it despite not currently _using_ it. That said, I only actually wield about ~100k Nano worth of flippable pressure in either direction, which is a lot when we're low volume and absolutely nothing during a pump.", "928" ], [ "> I still got like 40k to spend but it didnt even fucking let me due to \"price mitigation\". \n\nI just repost into smaller sacks. \n\nTry buying 25k Nano - > PRICE MITIGATION 13K MAX - > ok I buy 13k x 2 \n\nEDIT: Nevermind. Price protection strategy is also stopping me from buying any on margin as well. For some reason, I think it's because I am holding all of KuCoin's shortable Nano as hostage. I tried returning 2k of it and I was immediately able to buy 1.1k more Nano on Margin, then I took the 2k Nano back. \n\nSo it looks like I am killing Nano margin liquidity right now due to some flaw in KuCoin's end.", "928" ], [ "> But I ain't got the nerve for it. I only look for risky arbitrage opportunities and they always pay off.\n\nLmfao you don't have the nerve to short a bit but you'll march in front of the BitGrail steamroller to grab a 20% gain. Holy shit. \n\nI also pulled my shit out of BitGrail literally last fucking second but I sure as fuck didn't try doing more arb there LOL", "928" ], [ "> Btw- here does it say this subreddit is for memes?\n\nI dunno man. It probably doesn't say it, but this is like the OG nano meme sub. It was like its whole purpose for a while. Like 80% of the posts on the sub are memes... it'd be kinda hard to miss them. \n\n > Now that logo and phrases like diamond hands etc is associated with bag holders still trying to convince each other that things will turn around. Sad state of affairs. \n\nYeah.. It's a real tragedy what happened there. That's sorta why I don't want to be TOO associated with them, now, but I am okay with some association. We've got WSB in our roots. The old school WSB. \n\nJust need a super cute anime waifu catgirl as our mascot. I'd be down with that.", "434" ], [ "No idea why it's suddenly personal. I can easily distinguish facial features between china, HK, japan, vietnam, korea, PH, thai, lao, and cambodia, but would have more difficulty in N vs S china and mongolia. But I never said I even looked at the person to determine the gender. I said I always **see** it posted that it's a male and I saw other posters in the thread say the gender was ambiguous. \n\nI'll take your word for it.", "255" ], [ "> or a situation that the OP described (I.e. the defenseless)\n\nThis one thing kinda bothers me.. We don't know. We don't know that guy's story, and neither does <PERSON>. \n\nWhat if that guy recently just fucking raped and murdered <PERSON> wife at gunpoint in front of <PERSON>? Wouldn't you want to beat his fucking skull into a fucking car too? \n\nI mean.. I guess he's still the defenseless, but he kinda *deserves* it... It'd be like if another dude posts a thread in an hour saying that they watched some dude RNC another dude, rushes in to help, breaks the guy's arm.. and it turns out the aggressor in their post is OP in this post.", "486" ], [ "What if some third guy walked up, a kickboxer, right as <PERSON> was RNC'ing out <PERSON>? \n\nHe sees an unconscious dude in a pool of blood on the ground (original victim), <PERSON> choking out <PERSON>, and assumes <PERSON> is the aggressor. He rushes in, kicks <PERSON> in the face or ribs (kickboxing is all he knows), breaking <PERSON>'s jaw or ribs and freeing up <PERSON>.", "955" ], [ "> See I'm new to Reddit and willing to admit when I've been naive about internet people. I won't make that mistake again ¯_(ツ)_/¯\n\nYep. Definitely internet people's fault. There's no way possible that, despite being massively downvoted and tons of posters saying there's no gender component to what you're whining about (*which you've mysteriously deleted*), that you could be wrong. \n\nWhat was that you said in that other post, where your ego was showing? \"Definitely not your ego?\" Yeah. Definitely not that.", "247" ], [ "TBH, there isn't enough content to make them interesting for over a month without stepping on the toes of a more advanced class. Additionally, they become noob traps for the unmotivated. That said, I think there is a \"right\" way to do them (which I will explain at the bottom of my post).\n\nThe school I first went to involved an \"intro\" class which was basically all drilling. I felt like I mastered the concepts of everything in about 2 weeks. My instructor said to stay for a month, though. \n\nI ended up staying for about 2.5 months, because I made friends and they were scared of moving up to the next level of classes. I didn't want to move up alone and so I babied them a bit and kept nudging them until they gave in. They kept saying they expected the INSTRUCTOR to tell them to move up. Never happened, so they took a long time. \n\nThen, about a month later, I saw some new guys in the next-level class. They only did the intro class for 1-2 weeks before moving up. Was kinda annoying and felt like I wasted a solid 2 months on it. \n\nIt had **some** sparring (we're talking positional sparring for about 5 minutes at the end of class, not even up-down-out's). We all wanted more of that. \n\nSo if you're going to do it, make sure you: \n\n1. Don't let cowardly noobs get stuck hiding in it. \n2. Make sure it's loaded with good content on a cycle. \n2b. Make the cycle transparent, so newcomers know once the cycle is complete. \n2c. Don't extend past a 1-month cycle.\n3. Have at least 15 minutes of positional sparring, pref up-down-outs. \n\nI think the following is very important to tell new people: \n\n1. The *names* of moves, so they can do independent research. **Tell them it's a scissor sweep.** \n2. The *names* of positions, along with a daily reminder of what the positional hierarchy looks like. \n\nSo long story short, I'd organize it like this: \n\nTell students it's on a cycle. 4 week cycle. \n\nWeek 1: Guard: any 1 pass, scissors sweep. Reminder this is a neutral position in positional hierarchy. \nWeek 2: Side control: Scarf hold, any 1 escape. Reminder this is an advantageous position in positional hierarchy. \nWeek 3: KoB- > Mount transition. Gift wrap, Armbar, and buck-and-roll. Reminder this is a very advantageous position in positional hierarchy. \nWeek 4: Back. Any one escape and one choke (not bow & arrow - maybe RNC). Reminder this is the most advantageous position in positional hierarchy. \n\nAnd **strongly** encourage students to move up after attending all 4 courses. This will give students a solid understanding of the basics (positional hierarchy) and be able to identify what position they're in and formulate a decent plan, which may reduce spazzing and increase safety.", "525" ], [ "The fact that <PERSON> and other high-tier players hate RH too must be indicative of something. I'm a masters-ranked player and several of my masters-ranked friends hate RH as well. Several of them would rather see <PERSON> just deleted from the game since they think he outright removes certain playstyles (eg, playing without <PERSON> becomes that much more foolish), hardcounters too many heroes, isn't countered by anything, and is all-around too good at everything with too few/small drawbacks. They think he's actually just bad game design incarnate, and I'm in total agreement with them. \n\nMaybe masters is the new plat, but if so many people sub-GM think that RH is poorly designed... I wouldn't try to squelch the masses so that pros can think he's okay. I'd rather see Genji nerfs reverted.", "410" ], [ "> For all we know current higher SR players favor playing Roadhog (regardless of reason, either enjoyment or practicality in terms of climbing) even if not their main.\n > Also I think this type of argument is falling into effectively an implied ad hominem type attack.\n\nTotally agreed on both points. SO many RH mains in high tiers (because he's overpowered and they chose him to climb). And every non-RH player I've met in masters+ has also hated RH.", "197" ], [ "> Having one healer cancel all of another's abilities is just not smart at all\n\nSo you're saying that <PERSON> is a retarded hero and needs some serious nerfing? Because I'm in agreement. \n\nOr are you saying that the only viable hero should be <PERSON> and she needs to be a staple as the strongest hero? \n\nYou think that prolonged sleep darts and single-target bionades are the only thing keeping <PERSON> viable? Not, say, her 1v1 ability, aoe nades, superfast ult charge, or highest HPS in the game? \n\nPut cleanse on a 2s CD and it won't be able to cancel out more than 2 bionade targets.", "354" ], [ "> the whole design of the grenade is to prevent mercy from healing the target\n\nAs well as to prevent the other ~4 healers from healing that target. As well as to stop health packs from healing that target. And to stop the target from healing itself (soldier, RH, mei). All that shit, you know. \n\nAna nade cancels out like 10 heroes' abilities to heal (themselves or others), as well as cancels out healthpacks, but I don't see cries to remove it from the game as a result. Bionade is also AoE and can be used on teammates. \n\nCleanse would be a single-target ability with like a two-second cooldown, meaning Mercy could use it frequently but could not cleanse an entire bionaded team.", "453" ], [ "> You're also projecting that you believe people should be concerned with their body image, which says a bit about the hypothetical you here.\n\nSure, okay, I work out and shit because I care about my body image because society puts weight on it, or whatever. I also want to be healthy for other reasons (eg, I do and love BJJ and being an out-of-shape fatass would make it hard). \n\nBut isn't that my exact point? That all I'm really projecting is **knowledge that society cares about body image**. I'd have to be totally in denial if I didn't think so. Even if I personally didn't care at all about my body image, I'd still be aware that society did // body image insults are standard. \n\nAnother example: I'm a cis het white male. I have no racial disadvantages. I don't put any stock in racism or anything, though, because I personally think it's totally foolish to think that someone is born inherently inferior or superior based on a gene that controls skin pigmentation. And yet... I can imagine someone who would be insulted based upon racial insults -- I'm not projecting racial insecurities; I'm projecting the fact that I know society puts some weight on it // my target puts weight on it. And that's a pretty weak projection that says absolutely nothing about me as a person or my own insecurities about myself. \n\nFinally, if I were a Greek God you'd best totally assume I'd shit on people's bodies the moment they insulted anything about me, primarily BECAUSE they'd have no related retort. In fact, when I *do* insult people, I very often choose things that are my strengths (money, intellect). I wouldn't make fun of somebody for being weak at something I'm also weak at, since that'd easily open up the doors for an obvious retort. \n\nThis \"everything is a projection\" thing sounds like an oversimplification, and my entire point here is that I think it really belongs moreso on r/iam14andthisissodeep or an opinion blog than being stated as a fact.", "379" ], [ "> \"I'm playing this hero now and not even bothering because *you guys asked me kindly if I could flex* even though I never even considered asking if anyone else could possibly change so that I could play something else I liked/was good at.\"\n\nYou are being annoying. It doesn't matter how \"kind\" you think you are being. Getting \"Hey <PERSON>, will you swap if it doesn't work out?\" *every single game* is infuriating. Why do you have to ask me? Why aren't you asking our <PERSON> if he'll swap if it turns out he's a shitty <PERSON>? \n\nWhat's most annoying is the absurdity of it. Either I am: \n\nA. A responsible player who will swap if <PERSON> isn't working and I see an opportunity for a better option. \n\nOR \n\nB. A one-trick pony who can only play <PERSON> with any skill and swapping to any other hero would be a detriment not only to the team but also to my enjoyment of the game. \n\nAnd those will not change based on if you ask me if I'll flex. I'm going to flex if I want to flex regardless. If I'm responsible, I'll flex without you needing to tell me to do so. If I'm a one-trick, I'm not going to flex no matter how many games you whine to me in. \n\nI can't even count how many games I've lost because their Rein was better than ours or our <PERSON> is terrible. *Of course, they're so bad at <PERSON> and playing her anyway because they'll be shamed if they lock their Mercy*. Doesn't matter that those two KEY players aren't pulling their weight, because it's clearly <PERSON>'s fault. \n\nEven more annoying is the passive aggressive \"Hey guys, this isn't working. Maybe we need to switch up the DPS?\" (when <PERSON> is the only DPS). So I go \"Okay, to what?\" *no response*. If you don't know a better solution with a real reason, then why are you witchhunting for <PERSON>?\n\n > It's the Pharah's that are being countered hard and refusing to switch and then... \n\nWhat is \"countered hard?\" A lot of people tell me to swap off <PERSON> the second the other side has a Soldier or an <PERSON>. Um, hello, *every single game has Soldier or <PERSON>, USUALLY BOTH.* I didn't get to where I am as a Pharah main by swapping off her every single time I saw a Soldier. 80% of the time, Soldier isn't even good enough to stop me from wrecking the enemy team. \n\nI'll often see teams like Soldier+McCree+Ana trying to stop <PERSON>, and being told to swap off. Um, if they aren't even that good and I'm consistently surviving, then why aren't *you* swapping to take advantage of their team comp? Swap to stuff that counters *them*. \n\nI got trashed so hard for playing <PERSON> in an Ilios yesterday against an Ana+Soldier+Dva+McCree team (all swapped because I was crushing the first two rounds). Thing was, I was consistently surviving and putting out more damage, getting more kills, and getting out of teamfights. We lost the point because our healer got booped off TWICE and people kept getting gripped, but that didn't stop the \"GG pharah against full hitscan team rip\" attitude afterwards.", "439" ], [ "> As a personal opinion tho, the legitimately ambigous situations are far rarer then we commonly believe.\n\nAbsolutely 100% disagree. Ambiguous situations happen literally every single game. \n\nSometimes, a loss is as simple as \"Their Reinhardt was way way better than ours.\" In those situations, there was basically nothing you can do unless you realize the Rein V Rein battle is the problem, but *how many games has this topic ever come up and caused a comp switch*? Have you ever heard of someone going Tracer to help the Rein V Rein? An unconventional <PERSON> pick to wall off enemy <PERSON> and win the shield battle? \n\nOne Rein being better than the other happens *every single game*, and yet, this topic *never comes up*. That alone is proof that people blame the wrong shit all the time. Blaming the wrong shit leads to toxic/flaming/blame gaming and that is good for nobody. \n\nControl what you can: yourself. Pick a hero that makes sense for the situation. If you have a good idea, tell the team what you think might work and see if they'll cooperate. If you don't have a good idea, stfu. If you have a good idea but they aren't interested (you want them to play heroes they don't like or aren't good at), come up with another good idea... or, again, stfu. \n\nSometimes it's as simple as \"their team was better than ours.\" The most extreme example of this is when 6 healer mains are placed together against a team of one-tricks that are perfect meta characters.", "508" ], [ "> The problem is that solo Genji is like to go \"Screw you\" and go bastion and camp in spawn shootng basketballs.\n\nOr the opposite: the rest of the team says \"WE HAVE A TROLL 5V6 GG\" and go torb sitting in spawn. \n\nSee, the thing is that a Genji main is *used to his team flaming him*. He gets it *every single game that he's losing* and he doesn't give up (or he wouldn't be diamond+/whatever you are). It's the 5 other people on his team that are more volatile because they are used to getting a 6-meta every game and decide that, since he MUST be trolling, it's tiem for them to throw more.", "439" ], [ "> Both <PERSON>'s flank strategy could work, AND the swap for Soldier could work.\n\nSometimes, a swap for Soldier *wouldn't* work. Your team almost never says shit like \"We really need a soldier right now instead of a Genji because their Pharah is tearing into us and also we're just barely losing the shield battle.\" They instead just say \"Go <PERSON>!!!!!!!!\" because they *read, uh, somewhere* that <PERSON> is the \"meta pick\" (*whatever that means, shrug!*) and *Genji sucks weeb!!!!!!!!* \n\nSometimes I get told \"<PERSON> isn't working, can you swap?\" and I say \"To what?\" and they don't give a response. I personally think <PERSON> is an amazing hero for the situation and I believe I'm pulling my weight, so I keep playing him. Then I get \"<PERSON> wouldn't switch, <PERSON>\" when we lose. \n\nIt often ISN'T the case that the other 5 people have a legit strategy and I'm interfering with them. Their strategy is \"pick meta characters and make it work through brute force.\"", "410" ], [ "Yes. The fingers rest on QWE while my palm hovers over leftctrl (my hand is held diagonally). My left thumb naturally rests between Alt (crouch/modifier in MMOs) and spacebar, and can hit both with ease. Since this position has my fingers CURLED up, I can 'flatten' my index finger without moving it to hit both E and D. \n\nI've found QWES to be way easier since your 3 fingers rest naturally next to each other (slightly curled), which gives you better reach (eg, reaching the F keys and further left/right reach in MMOs). \n\nI also rebound the 'mobility' abilities to a button on right-thumb (near quick melee) and have a redundant keybind on ` (For left-pinky). I use each one differently. Eg, if I'm doing a genji dash & melee combo, I tend to go with left pinky. If I'm flying somewhere with mercy, I tend to use right thumb.", "89" ], [ "I'm the same way, but with \"guy.\" My father is \"Hey guy.\" My mother is \"Thanks guy.\" A police officer giving me a parking ticket is \"God damnit guy.\" My door jamming up is \"What the fuck guy?\" A pound of snow falling off the roof and landing on my head is \"REALLY guy?\" The nail I'm trying to hammer into the wall but keeps falling out of my hand is \"COME ON GUY!\" When I finally install the new door hinges and I'm showing them to someone it's \"Check out these guys!\" If I break my leg and am wearing a cast it's \"Guess I'm stuck in one of these guys.\" If my girlfriend jokes about cutting off my dick it's a \"But I need that guy!\"", "702" ], [ "I suppose the control is a form of interest. \n\nFamilies are weird like that, where \"gifts\" such as money often get the implication that you should be punished for not managing money properly. It sorta makes sense, since your parents feel it's their right/job to discipline you when you misbehave. \n\nSo you didn't behave well with money, and they're disciplining you by taking control back. It's more of a cultural thing than a logical one, maybe. \n\nI also think, in general, that if somebody borrowed money from family that they needed due to no fault of their own (eg, for an investment), that a family member wouldn't try to use it to exert control. Might reinforce the \"punishment for misbehavior\" idea.", "405" ], [ "I would expect it to feel weird to somebody who isn't used to it, yes. \n\nUltimately, QWES is better than WASD for a variety of reasons. But if you're required to hold down both E and D for any reason, it isn't going to be as great as just rebinding the ability. \n\nI'd stand by QWES > WASD more than I'd stand by D being the best possible keybind for shield. Though I do stand by firestrike on rightclick and shield on something else as well. Right click makes no sense for a shield, which could be on tilde (pinky) or a right thumb button (eg, where quick melee is).", "89" ], [ "Also, the biggest of all: **eye pokes are not a substitution for skill.** \n\nThey are, at best, a technique. Like all other techniques, it doesn't hurt to know of them, it's good to know how to defend against them, and there is no \"Silver Bullet\" technique. If there were, we'd all just be learning eyepokes and not BJJ. \n\nSo, like all other techniques, you can employ it to greater effect VS an untrained (or lesser-trained) opponent and employ it to devastatingly bad consequences against a more trained opponent. \n\nThe biggest problem with them is that untrained people use them as a justification NOT to train, and they justify it by pointing to people like <PERSON> (WHO IS TRAINED) and say \"if he can do it so can I!\"", "357" ], [ "Chin tucking isn't a valid defense. For your own science, push your chin down to your chest. Take your right thumb and press your chin into your neck as hard as you can. \n\nIn tons of competitions, people who lock an RNC or other deep-chokes can and WILL pretty much always just force it if they see you chin-tuck. Chin-tucking is, at best, a stall tactic to buy a few extra seconds to perform a real defense.", "525" ], [ "No. The problem isn't that others are trying to give ultra-specialized solutions to every probem. The problem is that your solution WON'T WORK and will, even worse, enrage the attacker and put the victim in an even MORE compromised situation. \n\nIf you bite their arm, they can *choke you through your own jaw*, which will still put you to sleep and might also break your jaw.", "955" ], [ "Even against this argument, I don't really see any problem with that. \n\nIf someone opens up the only grocery store in town and won't sell to blacks, now blacks can't move into that town. Hurts the blacks and hurts the town... OR provides an opportunity to open a store that'll cater to all skin colors. They'll profit better (since they have a bigger customer base) and the racist company goes out of business. \n\nOr the whole town is super racist and intentionally boycotts the nonracist company because they want them to go out of business, but what kind of fucking black person would want to move there? \n\nAnd, most importantly, it protects our liberty. When you purchase a home, do you have to allow every person to come in and trespass? You can pick and choose who comes in. The storefront is not given to you for free by the government. You pay to own that space, which means you should have the right to limit who may come in. For any reason. \n\nIf that means your small town has no yoga studios for gays, that sucks. They should open a new one that's more inclusive. \n\nOmit the public sector industries (so anything 911 related) obviously, since that's coherent with all of my other points thusfar, and good to go.", "2" ], [ "What does it offer really, as a tool? What are you gaining from classifications? \n\nYou said yourself that \"the boxes are big enough to hold people, not restrictive enough to prevent...\" \n\nBut those are both the same argument: **the boxes aren't very specific**. The fact that they are so big makes them **both** big enough to hold people **and** not restricive. \n\nBut that's the entire problem. They don't DO anything useful as a tool. They're big enough to be virtually meaningless. \n\nConsider if you were trying to write a dictionary definition for the word \"furniture.\" You don't want to go with something like \"Chairs and tables.\" because that is **too specific** (omitting stuff like couches, dressers, etc). But you also don't want to go with something like \"Stuff you put around your home to decorate.\" because that's **too general** (including stuff like carpets, rugs, ceiling fans, curtains, etc). \n\nM-B falls into the latter category. You don't actually gain any real insight into someone from their results. **Especially** because there is a huge disconnect between who people **are** and who people **how they act** (ie, a naturally shy person will often be VERY outgoing because they know it's important to succeed socially; someone who THRIVES socially might also be shy!). This is compounded by having really shitty questions that overgeneralize the types (eg, questions towards I > E often say stuff like \"I'd rather read a book by myself than go out with friends.\" -- what if I just fucking hate reading books but would rather go out with 1 friend and play DnD? Pretty fucking introverted but answering \"strongly disagree\" would give me +E points). \n\nSpeaking from experience, I'm naturally someone shy (was deep I as a child), grew into someone who realized socializing was absolutely vital if I ever wanted to succeed and now socialize all the time. Go to every party I'm invited to. Hang out with friends and go out constantly. Deep down, though, I still fucking hate going somewhere and hearing people being loud, and I can just sit and play an online video game for 15 hours straight and not talk to anybody. Deep down, I'm probably still an I, but if I answer the questions honestly (as in, \"I often go out to parties with friends\") I get middle-of-the-road or slightly E. \n\nI also get midroad on J/P, and I forget N vs S. \n\nThat all said, I DO think that B-M is pretty significant when people conform extremely to I vs E or T vs F. Unfortunately, I don't think this upside outweighs its murkiness. And, as you said yourself, it's a tool. A murky and questionable tool is just a timewaster IMO, even if it might give minor insight.", "394" ], [ "_URL_0_ \n\nI think that picture really summarizes the differences between us and them. At first glance, it looks like a straw man, but **if you read the second pane carefully you'll actually even see a guy say _\"I may not agree with what you say but...\"_** \n\nThat's EXACTLY how the world SHOULD be. We don't have to agree with each other. We can think we're racist assholes. But we should all have the RIGHT to feel the way we feel and EXPRESS OURSELVES. \n\nWow. Think of that quote for a sec. \n\n > But we should all have the RIGHT to feel the way we feel and EXPRESS OURSELVES. \n\nIt's almost as if **that's their exact argument, but about being trans/black/etc**. It's almost as if them rejecting Reddit highlights this huge hypocrisy on their end. \n\nAnd, TBF, the only strawman in that comic is the last panel, where people on Reddit would shut someone down for saying \"that's racist.\" I see people calling out racism all the time on reddit. \n\nIf you're being a racist fuck, we might downvote the fuck out of you but I would never want you banned for it. You deserve your piece. And if someone calls you racist, I might upvote them for it but I wouldn't want them banned either. \n\nIf you said racist shit I agreed with, I'd upvote you for it. If someone else said you were racist, I might even upvote them if I agree. If I think they're using it as a platform to tell you to STFU, though, I'd downvote them. \n\nPeople should be allowed to be lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transsexuals, queers, and **racists**. People should be allowed to be whatever the fuck they want, as long as they aren't hurting anybody else. LGBTQR!", "126" ], [ "In the USA, it is definitely valued highly in admissions to college (and post-college), but not AT ALL in the workplace. Nobody here cares what your GPA is and you get kinda laughed at for being so inexperienced if you offer it up. Furthermore, nobody asks to see degrees or verify that you have a degree. You can just walk up and say you have a degree in anything and they'll believe you because degrees are pretty meaningless anyway. \n\nAnd after you've held one real job, GPA means nothing. Your work accomplishments do. If some dude owns 2 even low-end patents for some chemical shit and applies for his MS in chemistry, nobody is going to be ragging on him for his 2.2 GPA from undergrad.", "907" ], [ "GPA matters to apply to higher school. Jobs don't give a shit and will actually laugh to themselves if you bother including your GPA on your job applications. Even your first job won't give a shit. \n\nFurthermore, your jobs WILL NOT verify your degree or your GPA. You could quite literally drop out tomorrow and apply to a job saying you have a 3.8 GPA in your BS in Mathematics and they will trust it.", "154" ], [ "Your employers, even your first, really don't give a shit about your grades. They won't verify them OR your degree anyway. \n\nI got my first job making 6-figures on a resume I wrote that included no mention of my GPA. I included \"BS Studies in Physics\" on my resume (ie, I studied Physics for a few years then dropped out of college because I hated physics). 3 months into the job, a co-worker (one who INTERVIEWED ME) goes \"Hey --orb, you have a degree in physics, right?\" and I'm like \"Nope. Dropped out.\" My boss was there and said \"I didn't know you didn't have a degree, but I also didn't bother reading your resume.\" lol \n\nI work in infosec FWIW. My buddy (an electrical engineer) said he has the exact same experience - nobody cared about his GPA or seeing his degree. I know 3 more people who just recently got hired by a tech giant near me to be various kinds of software developers/engineers, all of them told me their degree didn't matter aside from passing HR.", "907" ], [ "Turning in your work a bit late and telling the guys \"better late than never\" is just human mistake and trying to make light of it. \n\nTelling someone you're factually right, infinitely more intelligent than them, and making bullshit strawman analogies instead of just explicitly stating why they're wrong (\"We all lost 70 points. While you turning it in late was technically better than never, it was still an inconsiderate thing for you to do and cost us greatly.\") just makes you the bigger tool.", "925" ], [ "> Based on your argument style, I would expect you to be a INFP\n\nI am balls deep 100% T, 75% N over S, and then midroad on the other two. \n\nOverall, I think a lot of what you just said confirms why the tool is bad. Almost everything you said gets self-refuted here: \n\n > Now when that proves false, I should be unsurprised about the result because \n\n... because it's a bad tool/test. If something is giving you an expectation that \"doesn't surprise you if it's wrong\" that's pretty weak. For instance: I don't think racism/stereotyping is a very strong tool to use to prejudge people, but the same arguments could be made there. \"I see a black guy and I expect him to be violent, but I wouldn't be surprised if he isn't because...\" \n\n > But they do, they tell me the more likely of a person's inclinations \n\nAnd tell you nothing at all about how they approach those inclinations. Someone who is extroverted might love being around people but not for a *long time*. Someone who is T might be logical but might be *so fucking stupid their logic sucks*. Someone who is F acts on how they feel but *may feel no empathy whatsoever and be a total sociopath*. Just in general, they offer no real insight into other key aspects of people (how lazy they are, how passionate they are, etc). Obviously they offer SOME Information about people (because it literally derives from a collection of answers about the person), but putting any more stock into it than \"slightly useful trivia\" would be like taking OkCupid's match % seriously. \n\n > which will depend on the test. Some are good others are not. \n\nSorry if I've been talking about something else, but I thought we were talking more in the context of the post than in the context of clinical psychology or something. In the context of the post -- some person on tumblr/okcupid/whatever posting their INTJ proudly for the world to see -- we know they got them off some bogus crapshoot online, not some highly vetted clinical test that is really held up to the highest standards for accuracy. \n\n > As for murky and questionable tools, that's all that's really available to psychology \n\nIs this nonsense really employed seriously by psychologists/therapists/psychiatrists/etc though? I'll admit that I am not one, but I imagine this would be a waste of time. If you were trying to get to the source of someone's problem, identifying them as an N vs S isn't going to matter diddly. Similarly, if you're trying to help them cope, having them take a generic test and give them generic advice based on what box they fell into seems like a bad approach. \n\nThe entire thing seems more like a quick & easy way to tell someone basics about yourself, like a facebook intro or something. And that's fine, but there are also \"meta\" issues with it as well. Eg, I have some subconscious disrespect towards people who advertise their M-B on social media, and I'm not 100% sure why. Even if they match my 4 traits exactly, I'd take their advertisement of their M-B to be evidence of more dissimilarities between us than the 4 letters would indicate similarities. Pretty shitty english on my part wording that last sentence, but I think you get what I mean. \n\nIn any case, I place M-B as basically a step above horoscopes. Horoscopes attempt to place us based on nothing, whereas M-B attempts to place us based on very general crap that omits a ton of important aspects of character and focuses a lot on some unimportant ones. I'd rather see something that broke people down into 1000 very distinct personalities and were pretty good predictors of behavior.", "394" ], [ "Internship, maybe. Not an actual job. I have a friend who is an EE. After he graduated, he applied to like 4 places. Got accepted at all 4 places. Told me not a single one asked about his GPA or asked to see his degree. \n\nEveryone in these threads who keeps insisting it \"MATTERS for your first job!!!\" sounds like people who are still in college and are believing their parents, talking about internships, or just very unlucky. Everyone I know, including me, and everyone that everyone I know knows, and the vast majority of people I've seen online, have consistently agreed that GPA means nothing and nobody will ever ask to see your degree. \n\nIn fact, my company right now is hiring interns. Interns that get paid $35/hour or so, and these interns are not asked their GPAs.", "907" ], [ "I'm pretty sure an untrained person would never launch a \"SURPRISE SLAM\" against a BJJ BB. You can tell when a slam is coming soon and you can release your triangle (or whatever is giving them leverage to slam you) and opt for a different position. \n\nAn untrained guy would probably catch a trained guy less than 1% of the time with a bogus move. But an untrained guy can probably catch another untrained guy a decent % of the time with bogus moves, and if I were facing a roughly equally-trained guy we could probably decently employ bogus moves against each other.", "357" ], [ "Not at all. An MS program wants the fame/recognition of getting their school associated with a successful person. A 4.0 guy with a BS and no obvious passion in the industry just means he studies hard, which is a decent indicator of future success but far from the full picture. \n\nA dude with 10 years of experience in the industry, owns a few patents, maybe spoke at a few conferences, but had a 2.2 on his BS.. is going to get in, 100%, guaranteed, to anywhere they apply. There's no risk to the college that this person *might* be successful. They are **already** successful.", "907" ], [ "Yeah I think you have no idea how the real world works. I guarantee if <PERSON> had no MS in Physics but applied *anywhere in the world* right now, he'd get accepted instantly just based on his reputation. \n\nIf you think that schools just blindly pick high-GPA candidates and there are no exceptions or ways to bypass the rules, I'm guessing you're still relatively young? Young people tend to think, for instance, that colleges want people who have \"done community service\" and \"participated in clubs\" and other super vague/pointless shit like that, when **they're all actually just looking for someone who is passionate and likely to succeed.** \n\nIf you know nothing about a person, GPA is the best metric for potential future success you're likely to get. A dude with a 4.0 is more likely to succeed than someone with a 2.2 because either they test better (handle stress better), know more, or work harder (or all of the above). But a dude with a 4.0 is NOT more likely to succeed than someone **who has already succeeded and already has a reputation associated with their name**. \n\nAnyone with a decent reputation, past success, some patents and shit like that is **exactly** what college admissions want. College is just a product, and, like all products, they value brand recognition. They want you to associate their brand with successful people so that they can get away with charging you retarded amounts of money. The second best way to do that is to only accept the best applicants based on guesswork (GPA, perceived passion, etc). The best way to do it is to accept applications who are already successful. \n\nIf you doubt that money/fame/reputation is that big of a factor, you might want to also wonder why rich people can consistently get into top tier schools even if they have garbage GPAs or whatever. Their personal contributions outweigh any perceived drop in reputation/brand naming. It's all a business.", "154" ], [ "You're missing the \"if he's already got your lapel\" part, there. Sure, if you rewind time to BEFORE he has your lapel and give yourself a gun, you're good. \n\nIf he's got your lapel, as he's said, you won't be able to DEPLOY any weapon. Sure, if you already have a knife against his throat you're good. If it's in your pocket, too late. \n\nAnd a chainsaw has got to be one of the WORST weapons for this super close range combat. It's big, lunky, heavy, unwieldy, can easily be turned against you, etc.", "498" ], [ "You should take the time to read them all, because their quality is not nearly as high as their quantity. \n\nThe answers were typically incredibly noncommittal or nonanswers. Stuff like \"What did you learn over the years to help prevent injury?\" received answers like \"I learned a lot over the years.\" \n\nHave a lot of respect for him for what he's accomplished in the sports, but his AMA skills are WB level.", "555" ], [ "All of your examples (4 stripe BlB & PB, now 2-3 stripes) are only 1 stripe apart, so obviously there isn't a huge divide. \n\nBut there's a world of a difference between a 0 stripe white belt and a 4 stripe white belt. Basically \"first class\" versus \"got a year under my belt.\" There's also a world of a difference between a 0-stripe blue belt (~1 year in) and a 4-stripe blue belt (~3-4 years in). \n\nI agree that stripes mean less when you get higher. What's really the difference between a 1 stripe brown and a 4 stripe brown? ~7 years vs ~9 years? But at that point it might still be useful for instructors to gauge duration at belt and how close someone is to a BB I would think.", "748" ], [ "> Think of it this way: some might like it and not care that it happened, but that doesn't make it okay for the guys who didn't want it and never had a choice. \n\nAs a libertarian, I agree with you. But whenever I see someone say \"genitals mutilated\" like they were fucking scarring up our cocks to make them look like pinecones I always cringe a little in the same way I do when I see other buzzwords like \"patriarchy\" or \"preferred pronouns.\" \n\nIf you want to say there's unfairness in life, sure, go for it. Let's leave the dramatic buzzwords at the door unless we want to just become the opposite Tumblr, which I assume is currently held by redpill/incels/altright/etc.", "181" ], [ "But it is legal to discriminate. If I chose not to have black friends, that isn't illegal. If I chose not to allow indians into my home, that isn't illegal. If I chose not to allow my asian friends to drive my car, that isn't illegal. If I don't allow my white friends to dance in my home, that isn't illegal. I could go on and on. I can choose what colors of people are free to enter my property. \n\nIf I own a business, I should also be allowed to choose what colors of people I will do business with. In fact, **if I'm a huge racist I'm actually going to anyway**. Someone earlier in the thread said, more or less, that they prefer it when someone's racism is clear upfront. I agree with that. Let me state I'm a racist piece of shit that won't cater to (whatevers) and then they'll know. Then they can boycott my store and start their own business making more money because they have a bigger customer base. \n\nThe biggest reason not to be racist in hiring people is that you will pass up on the most qualified candidates. The biggest reason not to be racist towards your customers is so you have a bigger customer base. The biggest reason is never \"because the law says so\" or \"because it's morally the correct thing to do.\" \n\nFWIW, I'm a libertarian - I value little government interference and believe the power should be in the hands of the person who makes their company. I'm not pro-discrimination, but pro-individual freedom. \n\nSo this was never fundamentally about the ease of moving (notice I even said \"most importantly, it protects our liberty.\" It's about people who create something not having to give up rights to it so that others can claim rights to something they don't deserve.", "2" ], [ "The female equivalent IS mutilation. It totally fucks them up, like, real bad. Trying to equate the two is no better than tumblrinas referring to everything they dislike as \"rape.\" For men, it's pretty much just a cosmetic difference (not comparable) and sensitivity decrease (and I think most men have issues being TOO sensitive, if anything). Still, even if a dude had sensitivity issues (not sensitive enough) that hardly pales in comparison to how seriously awful, controlling, and potentially deadly female \"circumcision\" is. \n\nAs for the other half, I dunno, I don't really think much about how my dick looks. Other men don't want to see it and women who see it are already far enough in that they aren't gonna back out now based on the haircut. \n\nThough if you really want men to be able to choose how their dicks look, maybe you should become a cosmetic dickologist. Give people's dicks perms and shit.", "451" ], [ "I think you are dramatically underestimating how fast professionals can execute a move and overestimating how quickly you can pull out a knife and use it effectively. \n\nWhere's the knife? In a small scabbard on your belt? Probably latched over? So you gotta undo the latch, grab the knife, possibly switch what hand it's in or change your grip, and plunge it into your opponent before they do ANYTHING to disable the hand, grab the knife out of it, or just throw you because they've already got your lapel. \n\nAnd, uh, yeah @ the chainsaw. If a dude is so close that he's grabbed your lapel to prepare a judo throw (so I'm envisioning no more than a foot separating you two), you've got both hands on a chainsaw out to the side (because that's the only place that isn't going to already be cutting into people), it's going to be very difficult to swing that shit effectively. He literally just has to block your near arm, dude. \n\nNow if I were against an adult who were 10 feet away with a chainsaw, you're right. But these are all about safe zones. Why on earth would you want a CHAINSAW for combat that's taking place within 6-12 inches of your body?", "955" ], [ "I think the answer is pretty good. Points out why the OP's reasoning is flawed while speaking to him in \"his own lingo.\" \n\nBasically, <PERSON> thinks talking like a VerySmart is the only way to prove intelligence. Guy replies by shutting the OP down while also talking like a VerySmart to basically flash his mensa card at the door. Maybe <PERSON> learned something... most of these VerySmart's are young kids, after all.", "495" ], [ "I never read about that concept. \n\nBut I have been considering for the last 10 years how I'd react if my friend suddenly walked up to me and said \"Listen, you're 80 years old, have a wife and 2 kids, and have alzheimers. You only think you're 26 because you're having an episode!\" or something. \n\nI'd try to take them seriously, because if they're just joking around.. whatever, I'm minorly inconvenienced by their troll. But if they're serious, and I'm actually 80 years old and thinking I'm 26.. that must be heartbreaking for them.", "881" ], [ "Is it worse? Lots of people love their dogs. Lots of people (cops included) are total assholes nobody loves. I'd wager there's at least 1 cop that has less love in their life than a typical american household dog, and that's the exact cop who is likely to kill a dog for no reason. \n\nI'd rather see people like the OP killing cops until someone decides this kind of law is retarded.", "958" ], [ "I'm also a noobie white belt deathgripping for no reason and my fingers were god damn killing me. \n\nI've found that wrapping my fingers with athletic tape (the H-method -- I've also heard good things about the X-method -- google them) helps a LOT! \n\nI'm talking.. I wrap every single day before class now, despite it taking 10-20 minutes to do so, and I'm a huge lazy fuck about this kind of stuff typically. If I don't have the time one day, my fingers hurt IMMEDIATELY after class and I get BAD finger pain in the next mornings for the following week. \n\nVS if I wrap, I get absolutely 0 finger pain. \n\nWrapping is a godsend for me. I'm thinking eventually I'll stop deathgripping like a noob, but until then.. my crutch will help protect me. \n\nFWIW, I've also started pistol gripping more. I hear that helps quite a bit with finger pain / finger damage from grip-breaks.", "893" ], [ "When I try transitioning from side control to KoB, they always instantly get a knee there to block me, and now I've opened up so much space that they trivially escape. \n\nI don't want to just lay on them forever in side control, but I'm somewhat afraid to try KoB'ing them down since it pretty much always ends poorly for me. Any tips?", "525" ], [ "I like how your first two examples involved a couple in various versions of loving embraces. Your third example probably involved something sexual, but you didn't want to admit that we're all a bunch of gay dudes, so you swapped it over to some generic stuff about a supposed lanky guy. \n\nYou're right. I do see BJJ every time I see anything intimate. Nothing gayer.", "640" ], [ "Exact opposite. Who does <PERSON> shut down? Soldier more than anybody. He was already prevalent. Now even moreso. \n\n<PERSON> is the one who ruins diversity. Hook wrecks reaper, the supposed tankbuster. He shits on other tanks. He shits on rein shields forcing you to run one to win the shield war. He forces his own team to have a rein to secure a safe place for him to land picks. \n\n<PERSON> forces his team to have a rein. The two of them force their team to have an ana. Now <PERSON> becomes an obvious pick, and <PERSON>. No dva means soldier. Done.", "427" ], [ "IQ means you can recognize patterns and shit, often with numbers/spacial stuff. \n\nYou can score dogshit on IQ but be a social genius or have incredible reaction speed or have the genetics to be able to bench 1000 pounds or have a great immune system and live until you're 100 or be sexy as fuck until 80 or... \n\nThere are *so* many natural advantages you can have in life. Being able to recognize patterns is one.. and isn't even that important.", "438" ], [ "To be fair, though, even among my peers who started around the same time I did over the last 4ish months... I can count about 15 people who attended at least 5 classes. Of those, only 4 of them are still active. Of those 4, I am 100% certain 2 of them would have dropped it already (due to discouragement) if I weren't encouraging them. Of us remaining 3, life *constantly* gets in the way for the other two. I think only me + one of them is likely to actually reach blue+, and.. I'm still white, so it's actually possible *all* of us will quit before blue. \n\nI wouldn't be surprised if less than 10% of white belts became blue if you factored in the 1-off's.", "401" ], [ "> I have my backgrounds in more traditional japanese martial arts, so it strikes me as disrespectful to step on mat unclean. This aspect I could work out to ignore, if I saw poeple in BJJ really don't see it this way.\n\nBJJ isn't so formal, so I wouldn't worry so much about the disrespect or the morality of it. \n\nBut I agree with you otherwise. Potentially ruining a gi is annoying when somebody should just wipe off their makeup.", "357" ], [ "Let's put it this way: if I chose to put neon green facepaint all over my face to represent my favorite sports team during our rolls, and this facepaint was particularly known to be impossible to wash out of fabrics, would you want to roll with me every day? \n\nBlood washes out trivially with hydrogen peroxide, but certain types of makeup don't wash out at all. \n\nEven if blood couldn't be washed out, we'd all have slightly red stained gi's and we'd all know where it came from. Walking around with orange foundation or neon green facepaint all over your sleeves on your gi will look goofy.", "274" ], [ "2,000+ mat hours? If you train 5 days a week for 1 hour per day, that's 400 weeks -- roughly 8 years. \n\n8 years @ 5 days per week is typically late brown or even black belt. \n\nI typically see people hitting blue after around 120-200 hours of mat time, and a blue belt would be qualified to teach basic stuff to whites.", "822" ], [ "I'd imagine myself as more of a degreed black belt by now. Had rank 1 parses among 3 different classes, main tanked for top10 world guilds, over 99% of achievements at one point or another, hardcore completionist, walking WoW encyclopedia.. \n\nBut I've mostly quit WoW by now, so there's that. Still, 25,000+ hours over 12 years is about 2,000 hours a year, which is around 40 hours per week on average.", "822" ], [ "If twice a week is average, and average BB is like 10 years, does that mean you'll reach BB in like 3 years since you're going like 3 times as much? How exactly does time on the mat equate to progress (both mental and belt)? \n\nI'd imagine if you trained 3x as much that, after 3 years, you'd be better than someone who trained casually for 10. But I know you wouldn't have a black belt yet, so.. is this where the \"competitive purples beat casual blacks\" mindset comes from?", "412" ], [ "OT should be reworked as follows: \n\nIf you (attacker) are on the point/cart, and NO enemies are on it, OT kicks in. This lasts until either you step off or an enemy steps on. \n\nI say this because there is only one scenario that I think OT is valid: you wipe the enemy team, they're all dead, and now you're just waiting for the point to tick over to reach the third pin and unlock point B / wait for the cart to reach the checkpoint. \n\nIMO, when you run out of time, **you're done**. No more fighting. OT shouldn't exist to allow you to just keep cheesing your distance across the whole map. \n\nThe **only exception to this**, as described above, is one where you **already wiped the enemy team** and you're just waiting for the point to tick down. The reason this exception exists is because you effectively already earned the point (by wiping the team) and it's just the game's mechanics that are stopping you from moving onto the next point. \n\nIf they won't do that, then yes, it should deduct from future time banks. Once you run out of future time banks, it should add to opponent's remaining time.", "922" ], [ "Because it's an edge case that would affect a small minority of games. People who are dicks are going to be dicks regardless of potential SR losses. Source: I've met tons of dicks in my games who lost SR because they wanted to be dicks, and they often took little to no provocation. Other day, dude throws then leaves because I locked <PERSON> before him. We ended up winning 2/5 games (in Liajang) 5v6 without him, but still lost in the end. \n\nI think \"no penalty for loss\" sucks because it can lead to rank inflation, but... \n\nWhat would be nice is this: if you enter a backfill, you immediately steal 50 SR from the guy who left. If you lose, you lose that SR. If you win, you still gain SR as if you won normally. \n\nSame effect as before: if you lose, you don't lose SR. But if you win, you gain SR, and there's no rating inflation because the SR came from the leaver.", "197" ], [ "I once read an article that discussed how \"creepiness\" is rooted in an underlying sense of fear. Creepy guys are creepy because deep down we are somewhat afraid of them acting unpredictable or preying on us. This is amplified if we are worried about them being a sexual predator (as opposed to a non-sexual but still predator). \n\nSomeone who is attractive is less likely to come off as creepy for a variety of reasons. \n\n1. Attractive people are often attractive because they smile. Smiles are non-threatening and make us feel less* fear. \n2. Someone who is attractive enough can be desirable (and sexually less of a \"threat\") \n3. We have a natural inclination for whatever reason to just be more trusting of attractive people. \n\nI'm sure the list goes on, but generally this kind of thing WOULD be taken better by an attractive guy. Especially if they had a good conversation in the uber when he was driving her. \n\nOf course, it's also still possible for an attractive guy to be creepy. Just harder.", "378" ], [ "He won't trust you. He won't do better. Because then he'd have to learn the hardest lesson of all: his shortcomings are **his own fault**. \n\nHe believes that he's just cannon fodder bottom 10% beta male garbage by birth. Like it's his birthright to suck. Now he has to apologize to us for even being alive and that's the best he'll ever do. \n\nBut he can also take solace in that. He doesn't suck because it's **his** fault. He sucks by birth. That's just all there is to it. He's a **victim** rather than **someone who chooses to be lazy**. Victims get helpful, uplifting responses (like yours!) whereas losers just get told to stop being losers. If he admits he's a loser, he can get better... but then he also needs to admit he's a loser. It's like an alcoholic who doesn't want to admit they're an alcoholic. By pitying him, you're really only feeding further into his garbage beliefs that he's a victim. \n\nCould he improve? Absolutely. Does **he** think he can improve? Nope. Does he **want** to think he can improve? Double nope. Because then he has to admit the fact that his suckiness right now is due, in large part, to his recent years of incelling rather than working on it.", "219" ], [ "Depended on age for me. When I was like 6-9 I was probably pretty excited to get my ribbon to show I did something. \n\nEven to this day I feel like that's a good mentality to have.. Showing up to baseball practice every single day is still an accomplishment over being the kid who just sat his fat ass on the couch and watched TV. \n\nI think a \"participation\" ribbon only means nothing when you're contrasting against your peers (who obviously got the same ribbon), but still has meanin when contrasted against people who don't even play.", "724" ], [ "Ana can be a good example in the opposite direction: every single time I play Mercy (about one out of every 20ish games), I do more healing in one round than my Ana does in two. **And I prioritize non-tanks.** \n\nMost Ana's around my rating are just terrible. Good ones are a nightmare, but the bad ones need to play an easier hero because they are holding us back.\n\nMMR around 3400 FWIW", "913" ], [ "> like Eichenwalde\n\n<PERSON>: One time, enemy Symm set up teleporter. I went to look for it immediately as <PERSON>, flew all around their back area (the obvious spots) and eventually found it at that location, after wasting like 20s and having 4ish of its charges get used. Annoying. \n\nI also once saw a Symm use that room in Volskaya to good effect. \n\nKeep in mind, lots of places work well because they are tricky and force an enemy flanker to waste time hunting.", "444" ], [ "> I fully understand why catcalling makes women uncomfortable but hot damn, as a dude, I wish chicks would randomly shout compliments at me, haha.\n\nMy father said this kind of shit happened to him in his mid-20's when he was in great shape and very attractive. He said it was totally fucking awesome at first (exactly as you'd expect) but quickly got annoying. The only women who would do it are the kind of women he didn't want doing it anyway and it made it more difficult to find a decent woman to get into a relationship with.", "751" ], [ "> nothing to do with religion, rather with rabid puritans\n\nlol \n\n > mutilation of little boys in US is completly different to mutilation of little girls in the third world. \n\nlolx2 \n\nI'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are a reasonably intelligent individual who is just ignorant on the subject. After all, there are a lot of intelligent anti-vaxxers who are just ignorant. \n\nPlease research female circumcision and male circumcision and know the difference. Comparing the two with the same word, even if well-intentioned, is like when people compare slight injustices with the holocaust.", "451" ], [ "> Evolution has favoured foreskins in mammals for millions of years because\n\nThis argument is totally garbage. Evolution is working off of all kinds of assumptions that are no longer true. Eg: evolution gave us wisdom teeth because our old teeth would be dogshit. Now we brush them and just pull out the wisdom teeth. \n\nEvolution isn't an intelligent being that instantly adapts with changes in the environment. Evolution gave us the tools and intellect to build upon it to make something new. Making arguments based on \"well, evolutionarily, this is a good thing\" is as foolish as saying \"well we didn't evolve to drive cars!\"", "931" ], [ "It's all just calories in - calories out. \n\nHypothyroidism means you burn far less calories naturally. While someone else might need 2k a day, you only need 1k. Eat 1k and bam, you won't gain weight. \n\nOnly with gluttony is this a problem. If your car had hypothyroidism and only needed 5 gallons of gas to go as far as most cars need 10 gallons to go, you wouldn't be all bummed out.", "516" ], [ "I see people talking sometimes on here about how serious competitors have a certain level of conditioning that hobbyists don't. \n\nI think I'm a few steps above-and-beyond the average guy in my gym, but I want to seriously push that to the next level. I'm still mid-20's and can reasonably condition to be a higher-end amateur competitor for local comp's, and that's a goal of mine. Maybe even try bigger comps in masters some day if I feel it's really for me. \n\nWhat kind of conditioning should I be aiming for? General ideas, like weight (I'm 6'1), lifts I should be able to do, amount of pushups/pullups/etc I should be able to do, or crazy other feats of strength (should I grab my girlfriend, put her on my back, and run up a few flights of stairs every day?).", "412" ], [ "> I was so pissed I just closed my browser without even confirming my theory. \n\nIf I could give you one piece of advice, it'd be: do not google anything about OP. Whether you think it's totally innocent side story crap, whether you think it may be filler, whether you think it's a voice actor, no matter what you think, DO NOT google it. \n\nDragon isn't a really big spoiler (IMO) so don't worry about it, but stay tf away from anything. I'd even GTFO this reddit ASAP if I were you. 90% of the threads have unmarked manga spoilers followed by some dude going \"the anime sux anyway.\"", "243" ], [ "Not on a one-to-one ratio. If I tell you to go fuck yourself and die, I'm not more likely to get fired tomorrow. \n\nBut if I'm the kind of asshole who loses his temper over every disagreement and tells the opposition to fuck off and die, you'd better believe it will hamper my career in the long run. \n\nKarma may not exist as some kind of supernatural force, but if you're an asshole to everybody there is a good chance it will catch up to you.", "641" ], [ "What the?! What the fuck do you mean white folks in blackface? That's, like, the most racist-- oh! You put /s. Whew. \n\nThank god you shit on your own joke by informing us all of your sarcasm! We would've had no idea it was sarcasm by simply reading into the context and obvious satire. Whew. \n\nI hope I didn't make this uncomfortable for you... No, wait! I know how to save face! Quickly, make sure you respond to me by saying nonsense like \"the internet has no tone\" and \"<PERSON>'s law\" and to try to justify it!", "715" ], [ "Being young in general can work this way, though. I get a lot of older people trying to explain shit to me like I'm a kid because they think they know shit. \n\nSimilarly, my girlfriend is like a 110 pound asian chick who has never dieted a day in her life. Meanwhile, I used to be upwards of 400 pounds before I started hitting the gym and dieting years ago. Now I'm a bit of a fitness fanatic (BJJ 4-5 days a week, gym another 4-5, diet right, etc) with a \"bodybuilder\" body (+ shitty stretch marks from past sins), and I get her occasionally trying to explain to me how people can just lose weight by eating a pomelo 15 minutes after dinner or by mixing honey and ginger or some other homeopathic crap. \n\nPeople feel like they know shit and they feel like they have something to contribute. In 99% of cases, they're trying to talk themselves up. It isn't necessarily about trying to put someone else down.", "379" ], [ "> \"fixing cars is a man's business, women don't know how to do such things\"\n\nSo if a woman assumed I couldn't cook and started teaching me how to cook, that'd be femmesplaining? \n\nI mean... these assumptions exist for a reason: I can't, in fact, cook, and my girlfriend can't, in fact, fix cars... I can't fix cars either, but that isn't the point. \n\nOn an individual-to-individual basis, more men know shit about (cars/computers/games/sports/etc) than women. Maybe that's a problem with society or whatever, but that's just a fact. A man assuming a woman is likely to know less isn't due to feeling superior.", "971" ], [ "And it sounds like you're the type of player who causes their own problems, hence my entire post. \n\n > Getting annoyed at your team for communicating with you? That's silly. \n\nIt's asymmetrical. You are communicating with me to pre-pressure me into switching before you even see how I play. *In a perfect world, all 6 of us should be willing to flex play if our pick isn't working.* So why are you only calling out off-meta picks for that reason? Where's the guy *pre-emptively* saying \"Hey, if <PERSON> isn't working out, please switch.\"? They don't exist. You aren't just communicating. You're pre-emptively witchhunting off-meta picks. We get this *every single game*, so of course we're not interested in your opinion. For every 1 game you're right and our picks are holding the team back (or we're just playing poorly), we have 9 other games where we're playing fine but getting the blame anyway. \n\n > I main <PERSON> and I've being asked to swap to <PERSON> for this reason or that reason \n\nHow about the \"You're playing <PERSON> poorly\" reason? Pre-emptively telling an off-meta pick to swap (or \"be ready to swap\") is really only about distrusting their skills. \n\n > then either refuses to work with the team or just outright trolls them. \n\nRefusing to work with the team isn't the end of the world. You can still win - you conform to their pick (as top-tier players do with the one-trick ponies) or just play your best to outperform the other team. \n\nI *never* see off-meta picks being trolls. They are bullied *almost every single game* to switch off their heroes, and yet they still make it to Diamond+. How? Not by throwing every game where they have a doubter. \n\nFar more likely is the case where the off-meta pick won't swap to \"play with the team\" and then the team decides to start trollpicking in response. Half the attitude is \"Well if he gets to play <PERSON> then I get to play <PERSON>!\" and the other half is \"We're gonna lose anyway might as well throw it and blame him!\" \n\n > Countered hard is when you're dead as soon as you get into the air every time as <PERSON>. \n\nEven in Masters, with occasional run-in's against top500's playing <PERSON> or <PERSON>, I was never \"dead as soon as I hit the air\" with <PERSON>. You boost up out of LoS, shoot your first rocket in their direction, call to your team that they're lit and one of your flankers prioritizes them for you. \n\nThat's not to say I've never switched off <PERSON>, but if one soldier is capable of shutting your <PERSON> down with an Ana, meanwhile you have a DVa and a flanker that aren't pressuring Ana/Soldier at all, that's just as much your fault as theirs.", "439" ], [ "> He's got the largest hitbox, no armor, no mobility and limited effective range. \n\nSo? None of that is a counter. Just stating facts. Facts that are offset by other facts. Saying those facts without his pro's is like saying Tracer is weak because \"she has the lowest HP in the game, very short range, blah blah blah...\" \n\nBut to talk about each one: \n\n1. Large hitbox is offset by massive HP pool. \n2. Most heroes, in fact, do not have armor. RH functions more like a DPS than a tank, and no other DPSers have any armor. \n3. DKs in WoW have no mobility, but death grip is better than charge in many instances. Offsetting your opponent's position is often better than changing your own. \n4. His \"limited effective range\" is actually classified something as \"mid-range\" -- and this \"mid-range\" is basically a 1-shot. If <PERSON> touches you, you might as well die. A 6-second, mid-ranged touch-of-death with a HUGE hitbox so forgiving that landing it with 50% accuracy takes days of practice and 70% takes maybe a week or two. 70% accuracy as normal DPS heroes would be absurdity. If <PERSON>'s arrows are tree trunks, then RH's hook is the empire state building. \n\nAnd even if you have a \"but his left click\" and a \"but his right click\" it's all irrelevant: all heroes have pros/cons. RH just has too many pros, not enough cons, and he forces which heroes MUST be picked (Eg, Rein/Ana). He really should just be deleted.", "476" ], [ "> and we'll organized you may get 1 hook off then you're done for. \n\nSo if the other team is extremely mobile and well-coordinated (so, basically, a dive comp with extreme coordination), you can *go even with them* (ie, trade yourself for 1 person) by simply pressing a button. And you basically ruin their entire dive if you trade yourself for certain heroes (<PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, etc). \n\nThat isn't balanced. Every hero in the game is weak against a coordinated 6-man dive, but <PERSON> is probably the best of all since he can actually kill 1 with an ezmode hook and maybe even lucky 1-tap another. \n\n<PERSON> having weaknesses is not the same as having counters. <PERSON> has counters (eg, <PERSON>) that make him virtually unplayable if the other team has a competent one. <PERSON> has counters (eg, Reaper, DVa, RH) that make him virtually unplayable if the other team can aim. <PERSON> has counters (eg, <PERSON>) that make her virtually unplayable if the other team has one that can aim. \n\nMany heroes have no such counters, but not many of them are as matchbreaking as <PERSON>. <PERSON> is maybe the only other one.", "456" ], [ "> Roadhog has plenty of hero counters as well. \n\nI'm listening. \n\n > Also, your example isn't really valid. There's no guarantee you get a pick. And getting 1 pick them dying and losing the point does you no good. \n\nFirst of all, it's YOUR example that you say isn't good. See? \n\n > but if you get dove by an extremely mobile team comp that is speed boosted and we'll organized you may get 1 hook off then you're done for. \n\nThis alone should prove to you how biased you are about the facts: you gave an example of a situation where RH is bad/\"countered.\" I point out why RH is actually *the best hero in the game* in that exact situation, and you respond by saying that it's a bad example because it's one where RH is good. You can't have it both ways. \n\nSecondly, if <PERSON> gets a pick and his team loses the point 5v5, that's on them. They have defender's advantage and are down, basically, a DPS, while the opponent might be down something more crucial (or a DPS at worst). \n\nIf he doesn't get a pick... so? No other hero would've gotten a pick in a 1v6 dive situation, so RH is par for the course.", "558" ], [ "> Aren't you doing the same thing by just listing off <PERSON>'s pros and none of his cons?\n\nHis pros greatly outweigh his cons. Hook is OP. \n\n > you can counter Roadhogs hook by just fucking dodging it now. \n\nFavor the shooter. \n\n > ignores the fact that he has to land the hook in the first place. \n\nHitbox as large as Genji's deflect box with ENORMOUS vertical forgiveness. Hitting hooks with a 70%+ accuracy is possible and seen in brackets as low as platinum. Nobody else approaches 70% accuracy with anything, much less anything that can 1-shot 90% of the roster on an insanely low CD. \n\n > Triple tank just isn't that strong anymore, and because of that Roadhog isn't as strong. \n\nTriple tank isn't strong anymore? What's the new meta? I'm still seeing RH picked in every single game. \n\n > Roadhog was perfectly fine and balanced in Overwatch for several months \n\nWrong. RH was always an overpowered, game-ruining piece of garbage. <PERSON> was always BS. Reddit was just too busy witchhunting <PERSON> and shit to take care of the real problem.", "410" ], [ "This is the most absurd thing I've ever read. \n\nIt isn't like the fucking natives had it handed or promised to them from God either. They just showed up first and said \"This is mine now.\" \n\nWell guess fucking what, natives? That isn't how shit works in the real world. You don't just get to claim shit because you saw it first. I don't get to just claim I own the sun just because nobody else has claimed it yet. If you want anybody, including others in the modern era, to respect your claims, you need to be able to prove and defend your claim to it. \n\nHow infuriating!", "824" ], [ "> I am not my grandfather, and I am beyond grateful for that.\n\nYour grandfather wasn't necessarily an evil bastard, either. Nazism made sense when they were living under awful French oppression after WW1. People did what they felt they had to do and trusted their leaders to do what was right, or at least necessary. You may have done the same thing if you lived in those circumstances. \n\nWhat's extra-retarded, too, for instance, is that something like 80%+ of the whites in america aren't even the descendants of the slave-owning whites from centuries past. My great-great-great-great grandfather never owned slaves, but I'm still white. Why would I apologize? Literally because I share skin color with people who did? That's fucking retarded! Should blacks also start apologizing because they have noses and slave owners also had noses?", "180" ], [ "> taken from their grandfather's grandfather's grandfather\n\n... who kinda just owned it because they happened to be here. Not like they built elaborate infrastructure and we came along and bulldozed it all. They were often nomads and shit or had small, mobile housing. They didn't own land. They used it and were happy to share it. They weren't unhappy we took it. They were unhappy we won't share it. \n\nBut their whole philosophy is incompatible with the modern world, where ownership exists.", "824" ], [ "I never noticed either, growing up. Then I was dating this chinese girl and she ALWAYS noticed if she was the only non-white/asian in the room. I told her nobody else noticed, but she was CERTAIN that all the whites in the room were silently judging/hating her for being asian. \n\nI sorta mean it when I say: it's your white privilege showing that you don't notice it. Apparently, some minorities feel this way for some reason (justified or unjustified) for reasons that us in the majority never feel or something. \n\nBut that's about as \"SJW\" as I'll ever get. I'm agreeing that it's bullshit to feel that way and TOTALLY IRRATIONAL, but just saying that you or I don't notice/feel it probably because of a difference in upbringing.", "987" ], [ "But that sounds like a fault of the other students. I wouldn't be surprised if the people doing it were either: \n\n1. SJW's, looking at you to be all \"So sorry for you!\" \n2. Friends, looking at you to bust your balls. \n3. Socially awkward fucks who are probably uncomfortable in general. \n\nNo mature, socially-aware adult would look at the only black person in the room when the topic of slavery comes up to give them a wary glance. What the fuck?", "859" ], [ "I kinda think it's satire just because of the line where he said \"it isn't enough to give your black students an extension because <PERSON> was elected.\" \n\nWhat? That isn't enough? What the FUCK? Why would you need an extension? You fucking coward! \n\nHow would you fucking feel if your surgeon canceled the surgery to give your wife a lung transplant because he needs some breathing time because <PERSON> got elected? This isn't how the fucking real world works.", "614" ], [ "> she just believes vaccines don't work in the first place. \n\nUnfortunately, this type of apathy is due to such overuse of other shit that doesn't work. Eg, computer antiviruses are basically worthless against new threats, so why run one? Most people I know don't bother with one. Ignore security warning dialogues because they're annoying. Elevator says not to put more than 600 pounds in there, but I know from my engineering class that they actually fudge down the number by about 25-33% for safety reasons and you could actually put 800 pounds in there... While I'm at it, I might as well go 10 miles over the speed limit. I mean, everyone is... How bad can 10 miles over 10 miles over the speed limit be, anyway?", "929" ], [ "> But unfortunately people get to decide what their own gender is, because it's a term about experience and expectation, with no empirical standard.\n\nExcept people don't get to decide. That's the whole thing. If I suddenly decided I'm not 6'1\" tomorrow, I'm still fucking 6'1\". If I try to then say that I'm actually redefining 6'1\" to mean something other than factual height that can be objectively proven, that doesn't mean I now \"get to decide.\" People - even entire groups of the mentally deranged - do not get to just get together and redefine a word into another word. A gender is not a personality. \n\nOxford dictionary says as much as I said: it's male or female, but \"the term is also used more broadly in a different way.\" Kinda like the definition for literal is \"actual, but the term is also used more broadly to be wrong.\" \n\n > I seem to have laid out the case for gender so impartially that everyone in this thread assumes I'm some kind of SJW, when I couldn't be farther from it. That at least, I take as a compliment to my even-handedness. \n\nYou say \"impartially\" but what you really mean to say is \"incorrectly.\" Impartial would be saying \"Gender historically meant male or female, but tumblr users attribute it to entire personalities.\" That lays out the historical fact as well as the new-age trend. You're actually lending credence to their misuse of the word, which is not impartial whatsoever. \n\n > Gender is about your life experience, and it's supposed to be tied to sex. But the fact that you can be transgender proves this is a lie. \n\nPERSONALITY is about your life experience and gender IS your biological sex. Again, you're just wrong. You can continue to be wrong all you want, but your own Oxford dictionary (which you say \"attempts\" to define a word - laughable) tells you that gender IS male and female. Transgender does not somehow break this, since they are literally (not new-age literally, but LITERALLY) changing their sex. They are doing physical things to their body to (at least partially) alter their sex. Estrogen/testosterone supplements and genitalia surgery. \n\n > (That's why the word is transgender, not transsex) \n\n\"Transexual\" is absolutely a word and was used for like a decade before transgender. \n\n > It's been co-opted and ruined. It no longer has any actual, defined meaning. \n\nOnce again, you *literally* (correct literally) gave a *definition* for gender above. Now, you say that it has no defined meaning. In this thread, you asked for a definition. Either you're intentionally wasting everyone's time or you just don't understand what a definition is. Just because 0.1% of the world decides to \"co-opt\" a word and redefine it doesn't mean the word means something else now. Gender is M/F and until the Tumblr lunacy catches on to the levels of the \"literal\" trend, the word doesn't change just because some idiots are misusing it. \n\nLending credence to the mentally ill/teenage rebels doesn't make you more centrist or empathetic or whatever you're going for. It makes you an enabler.", "654" ], [ "I spent $120 on the game after the expac came out, don't need more of THESE card packs and would rather gold, and I'd like to actually have my third slot instead of spending a few hours defeating easy fucking bosses - 5 hours of my time for like 4 fucking packs. \n\nIs that so hard to understand, dipshit? How poor are you that you think several hours of grinding easy pve shit is worth 4 packs worth less than a cup of coffee?", "835" ], [ "I actually dunno how anyone enjoyed <PERSON> after part 2. After they stopped using Ripple and started using Stands it became a joke. <PERSON>'s stand was an S class in almost every category and he had no tactic other than just punching people down, while they were often a shitton of B/C ratings and one A. He had more stamina, power, speed, and everything else. His ultimate power was eventually the same as <PERSON>'s stand as well. Total snoozefest. \n\nWhereas the stone men or whatever they were called - they were GREAT villains. Ripple was a combination of magic and smarts. \n\nPart 4 took it a little away from Stands being \"Whoever has more S's\" and into more clever-based combat, but then it felt more \"episodic\" - as in, plot points didn't connect that seamlessly. They just sorta... happened, unrelated to each other, to assemble a crew. Lots of enemies felt like random filler. <PERSON> felt nerfed - probably because he was stupidly overpowered in part 3 but still. \n\nOverall, I thought <PERSON> was just really great for two parts and then took a sharp nosedive over parts 3 and 4. I couldn't even touch it after that.", "1011" ], [ "> Cultural appropriation is \"problematic\" when it demeans, distorts, or cynically commodifies that culture.\n\nStill isn't. \n\n > demeans \n\nThis is racism, not cultural appropriation. Dudes dressing up like native americans going \"WAWAWAWA LOOK AT ME IM A BARBARIAN\" is racism, not cultural appropriation. \n\nDudes dressing up as native americans for halloween is \"cultural appropriation\" by retarded SJW definitions, but is not actually \"problematic\" at all. \n\n > distorts \n\nThis is just being inaccurate. Some chick wearing a pink kimono because she thinks that japanese women wear 'em 24/7 due to anime is not \"problematic.\" It's just incorrect. Or maybe she just thinks kimonos are cool as fuck, and why is that a problem? \n\n > cynically commodifies that culture \n\nAssuming I'm understanding you correctly, this would be like a dude selling fake afros and watermelons in a \"AUTHENTIC TOUR OF NEW ORLEANS\" stand (commodify - > attempting to turn culture or stereotypes into something profitable, I assume). In which case, again, that is just racism.... or cynically profiting off of others' racism. In both cases, it isn't cultural appropriation.\n\nCultural appropriation is never a problem in-and-of-itself, because it isn't a real thing. It's a bullshit buzzword. \n\nI don't see anyone bitching about how other cultures appropriated the internet, or the way we build buildings with steel and shit. Do cultures have inherent patents on shit? \"We invented this style/clothing pattern/communication tool and now YOU have to live in a fucking mud house because you didn't invent steel yet hahahaha\"?", "255" ], [ "It's one of those slurs that make you think less of the person who says them, rather than feel bad that they called you it. \n\nIt's such a lame slur. You're calling me a \"white person\"? Is that even negative? \n\nIt's like this one scene in One Piece (an anime about pirates) where the various characters are playfully angry at one of their crew members (who is a pirate swordsman who attacks with 3 swords -- a technique known as \"three-swords style\"). The crew members take turns \"insulting\" their swordsman crewmate by giving insults such as: \n\n\"Idiot\" \n\"Heartless\" \n\"Barbarian\" \n\nUntil the captain of the ship, known for being a bit of an idiot, says \"Three-swords style.\" \n\nAt that point, another crew member corrects the captain and says \"Hey, captain, you can't just say 'Three-swords style'! That isn't an insult, that's just what he does!\" \n\nAfter a brief pause, the captain tries a new insult and says \"Four-swords style!\" - which, on top of being no better as an insult, is also just factually incorrect. \n\nThat is how \"wypipo\" is. It's an attempt at an insult that just describes what I am. \n\nBut now that I've said this, laughingly, it's hard for me to understand why \"jew\" or \"negro\" (which literally means black) are offensive. My initial assumption is due to their long-entrenched history of CONTEXT for when they're said being racist. But the people who say \"wypipo\" are doing it in a racist CONTEXT as well, with the intent of offending... and I'm still not offended. \n\nSo I guess it's just a lame insult because 1. white people don't give a shit and 2. it's just low effort and employs black ebonics which are inherently offensive to educated blacks moreso than anybody else.", "389" ], [ "People also just love making excuses. Look at ANY team game. People blame their losses on their shit teammates. Either they played great and a teammate couldn't back them up, or they at least played OK and not everyone pulled their weight. Or they played like shit but it's their teammate's fault for not supporting their plan - their brilliant plan hinged on their teammates pulling their weight, supposedly. \n\nPeople just love blaming others. And the second they see everyone around them blaming others, they just join in. \n\nPoor people blaming gov. Blacks blaming whites. People blaming jews. Poor blaming rich. Rich blaming politicians. Politicians blaming the people. People blaming their boss. Bosses blaming their employees. It's all over.", "806" ], [ "Aside from people downvoting you over your entitlement, even still, that's not what happened and if you know the news you know that. \n\nIn this particular case, there was a code on the bathroom. The guy needed the code. The manager was not obligated to provide a code due to policy, and so he didn't. \n\nAt that point, you can either try to be charismatic (\"Hey man, I get coffee here like every day, can I please just use it this once?\") or whatever, but if you get aggressive and he says \"No. You need to leave\" then it's time to fucking go. You're breaking the law by staying. Period. Don't care what you think you're entitled to.", "402" ], [ "On the flipside, all of his companies are total shitstorms to work in. Exploitative and shitty, totally not 21st century. They make Amazon look good, let's just say. \n\nAnd on the flipside, I dunno. Vitalik is also an arrogant piece of shit despite being worth millions or billions. They're kinda ruining the american dream. Where Old Money was just smug in a not-acknowledging-your-existence kind of way, New Rich is all about being condescending on twitter. Like that dickhead who made Minecraft.", "598" ], [ "4 also felt like bad guy of the week. 2 felt like it had an amazing story (nothing wrong with good guy vs bad guy - plot twist's with <PERSON>'s mom & <PERSON> best jojo best memes). I also felt the most connection to the characters (they had lots of throwbacks to part 1, <PERSON> is a good example) and was devastated when <PERSON> died. Literally didn't give any fucks when <PERSON>'s companions died because they were meaningless to me. \n\nPart 4 I just stopped midway through. It felt like more \"bad guy of the week\" and the supporting characters were SUPER tropy and boring. \"Wah I'm a loser guy with no self-esteem\" was one of the main characters. Hard pass. \n\nMaybe it gets good again after part 4, but stands were such a boring power I basically couldn't stay into it.", "513" ], [ "To be fair, the whole \"Hey yeah I gotta wear this cup because...\" thing isn't TMI. It's more like socially awkward banter. \n\nI wouldn't have reacted so negatively up front to him.. he's new, nervous, and just trying to meet someone and make small talk -- but he did eventually vindicate your suspicions by acting so weird later, so I dunno. The ends justify the means?", "339" ], [ "No, but where in the post does it say he was talking about his boner? I'll wait. \n\nYou couldn't find it? Me neither. For all we know, the sentence was going to end: \n\n\"Ah, I gotta wear this cup because people in Muay Thai, the class I came for but am late to, can mistakenly kick me in the balls. I hope you don't mind that it might get in the way during armbars.\" \n\nFor all we know, that's the sentence. Is it a little awkward if you're 15 years old? Absolutely. Is it creepy? Is it a discussion about boners? \n\nI'm not trying to be mean, but no. If you *must* assume boners from a story that did not explicitly mention boners, then you likely have some stuff going on yourself.", "702" ], [ "> I just didn't think I actually had to spell that out. \n\nYou did for me, because the thought of getting a boner from my dick rubbing against my underwear is absolutely 100% absurd. It rubs against my underwear all day long and I don't get random boners. If this were actually a thing that happened to men with any frequency, pretty sure we'd all have boners 24/7 unless we were wearing something to prevent the contact in the first place. \n\nI had assumed he was going to say that the friction hurts his balls during armbars or something. Apparently, I'm not the only person who thought that (judging by some of the other comments), so I guess it's best to \"spell it out.\"", "524" ], [ "> Hey man, I don't want to argue, but she specifically say exactly that he was talking about his dick getting hard: \n\nBut she said that in a sub-comment that I hadn't read at the time of the original comment, which was simply a response to the story given. \n\nIf you read all the comments in the thread, I admitted it was *super creepy* when she clarified. [Look at the sub-comments here.] (_URL_3_) I admitted that it was super creepy and two other people agreed that it was unclear. She's also since edited the main body of the post to include this snippet because it was not obvious. \n\nThe only reason I held my ground [here] (_URL_0_) to defend my [original interpretation] (_URL_4_) was because [you were such a needless dick with your \"some stuff going on yourself\" comment] (_URL_2_) towards my, again, [totally reasonable misunderstanding] (_URL_1_). \n\nDon't be so quick to be a dick in general and people won't want to argue with you.", "181" ], [ "To defend u/chokingmn's point, though, aren't you just loyal to your friends? \n\nIf your friends decided as a collective that they wanted to change gyms, would you stay loyal to the gym or to the friends? \n\nIF you were loyal to the gym, I'd think you'd be outraged that the friends were breaking loyalty to it. If loyal to the friends, you'd just be interested to see their reason and probably see if the new gym would work for you.", "412" ], [ "To defend u/chokingmn's point, you bring up \"friends.\" Would you leave your current gym if your friends left for a better gym, or would you stay loyal to the gym even if a better gym opened and your friends left for it? \n\nIt makes sense to me to be loyal to friends. That's called friendship. It does not make sense to me to be loyal to a business that is providing you a service in exchange for your cash.", "616" ], [ "Timeline of events for you: \n\n1. I read <PERSON>'s story. I did not understand the \"boner\" implication.\n2. I make my response based on (1), which partially defends the creepy guy. [Lots of people seemed to misunderstand this point, given who I was responding to and their upvotes.](_URL_2_) \n3. I find out [from other sub-comments] (_URL_1_) that the context was boner. I do not edit my comment from (2) for reasons (forgot about it, laziness, whatever). \n4. You respond to my message from (2) to clarify the point, which is fine. However, you [were a dick for no reason.] (_URL_3_). \n5. I respond to your message from (4) defending my message from (2) to explain why I misunderstood OP's story. Additionally, I called you out for being a dick in (4). This all happened [here] (_URL_0_). \n\nHope that clarifies your confusion. If you are still confused as to why I defended myself from your dickishness, or why you shouldn't be so quick to jump to dickish conclusions and act like a dick, then I don't have anything else to say. Good luck with that.", "809" ], [ "Fair enough. It does sound like you have some loyalty to your gym. \n\n<PERSON>'s point is that your instructors didn't just \"get your game to where it is today,\" but that you actually paid them for the service. It would be akin to being loyal to your grocery store for \"getting your pantry to where it is today\" - they didn't donate that food! \n\nBut obviously if they took special care of you or went above & beyond the call of service, that's different. <PERSON> feels like he paid for a service and got what he paid for, but if you feel you actually made friendships with your instructors and they've gone above their call to help you out.. well, that makes sense. They're both valid viewpoints.", "412" ], [ "From things I've read (casual reading), we're talking relatively small drops in reaction time throughout your life. The difference between being 20 and 40-50 is really only a tenth of a second or so. \n\nThis can be a gigantic difference in a game like CS, but even then it can be overcome by positioning and innovative grenade usage. In Overwatch, it's literally a nonissue. Even the pros do not hit 100% of their shots, so there are always errors that others make that you can use to compensate for your slight decreases in reflex. \n\nAnd in this game, there are heroes that do not need to aim or anything. Being totally honest, if I saw a 60-70 year old pro player shotcalling as <PERSON> who thinks like a god damn war general I wouldn't even be surprised. This isn't UFC fighting or the NFL we're talking about here where age is crucial for physical reasons.", "508" ], [ "> The amount of times we've both tried to perform a clutch shot and he's been literally milliseconds faster than me\n\nHow often does this occur in a game? Even if you were a widow main, I *still* don't think your age would matter. Even in Widow v Widow, there would be better ways to play that don't involve your reaction speed -- you snipe when he's distracted, have a teammate distract, have a teammate lay cover fire, you peak in less predictable ways, etc. \n\nI think you could even play hitscan characters 100% fine.", "183" ], [ "> White, not so much, and\n\nOne thing I absolutely cannot stand is how black characters always talk about how they're black, or have other characters reference their blackness, presumably for my KKK benefit. \n\nBonus points if others in the universe are unreasonably racist, calling the main character a nigger as many times as possible. \n\nIf you want your main character to be a black, trans, gay, genderless amphibious fuck.. fine. Do whatever you want. But DON'T make that be the DEFINING trait of the character. \n\nEg, <PERSON> in Overwatch. She's a lesbian. Not a big deal. Never acts like a lesbian or does lesbian things. When other characters talk trash to her, they don't reference her being a lesbian. The whole game doesn't scream HEY OMG A LESBIAN at you.", "632" ], [ "Pretty sure cis asian able bodied woman would be a problem, too. Studies have consistently found that most straight men prefer asian women for almost every race (Hispanics prefer white women by some small margin), in the same way that white men are preferred by almost every race (black women prefer black men by a noteworthy margin). \n\nWhite man/asian woman is pretty meta these days, so expect that to be considered discriminatory before long (if it isn't already).", "255" ], [ "> they're not intended to or interested in exploring racial or sexual identity\n\nAnd nor SHOULD they be. You're doing something FOR FUN, not for a constant reminder about how you either have things better or worse off than others. \n\nAnd let's be real: I don't give a fuck what race, gender, etc you are. If you are living in a first world country and developing or playing video games, you ARE PRIVILEGED. You aren't blistering up your fucking hands working in a shit field all day to save up money to buy your wife back from the warlord that's raping her daily. You're privileged.", "411" ], [ "> diversity in story telling\n\nWhat do you mean, story-telling? \n\nThere's no diversity to have a black guy who is a pokemon trainer and does the exact same shit as the normal guy. \n\nAnd it'd just be annoying if you were a black guy and every pokemon trainer walked up to you \"HEY <PERSON>, I'VE GOT 3 CATERPIES. I'LL WRECK YOU BECAUSE YOU'RE A NIGGER!\" \n\nWhy TF would anyone want to explore racism while playing a game for fun? Maybe in a game like Skyrim, sure, but the vast majority of games are not set up like that. I'd rather have top notch storytelling than fall back on something as unimaginative as racial wars.", "935" ], [ "There's always something to bitch about. If it isn't a white man, eg <PERSON>, the woman is too sexy and that's bad for women's body images. The man can be ripped as fuck but that's OK. \n\nIt's like we need the severely underrepresented groups (black muslim fat females), but what the fuck? Would you want to play Skyrim where your main char is a fat black muslim woman and you can't character customize? Sure. Would you want to play it MORE? Lol no.", "632" ], [ "Also fear and lack of experience. \n\nTake jiu-jitsu for example. If you're a brand new white belt, you're going to be put in crazy close-quarters positions with somebody who is tying you up like a pretzel. New white belts are called \"spazzes\" because their natural reaction is to try to go hard and quickly start muscling out of everything with explosive (and often, dangerous) movements, which often injurs themselves or their partners. \n\nDone it 100 times, though, and you're totally comfortable in a roll. \n\nTake it to a combat situation. You're afraid. You're untrained. You're just trying to do your best. \n\nBut if you're trained.. you aren't as afraid, you're calm, your nerves are under control.", "357" ], [ "> unpacking white privilege and processing guilt and shame.\n\nWhat does this even mean, anyway? How do you unpack privilege? To bring it to light? To say \"these are the ways in which I am privileged?\" \n\nWhat about everyone else's privilege for living in a first world country with enough free time to care about issues like this, as opposed to, say, being born somewhere that you don't have the freedom to care? Or even worse, where you're too worried about having enough food to even care in the first place? \n\nAnd why am I processing guilt or shame? What am I guilty of? Being born white? What am I ashamed of? Being born white? Or that others who were white did bad things? What?", "987" ], [ "Some people would *like* to be objectified, though. I had an ex girlfriend who liked me leashing her up and walking her around naked like a dog. I know other girls who would make a protest not to even allow her to have that choice it'd make them so angry! \n\nSome people like the idea of being so amazing/powerful/rich/whatever that other sexy humans will basically be your slave just to be in your presence. OTHER people actually WOULD like to be the slave of such a person. \n\nAnd since your examples covered 1 female picture and 1 male picture, this obviously happens to both genders. \n\nI still don't see why objectification is inherently bad anyway. If I talk to a girl and all she sees me as is a big sack of man meat and a good night, why do I care? IF she instead saw me as a smart guy who can hold a good conversation, should I care more? Both of those are just two small parts of me. If she's interested in knowing the whole me, she can. If she isn't, I'm not going to get upset and tell her to live her life differently. \n\nIF it's about media, and people are saying they don't like objectification of women because it makes young girls feel bad... That's a problem, too. What if I don't like muscular guys because it makes me feel bad? Or what if, in TiA's case, I don't like cis het white males because they make me feel bad? Where do we stop censoring?", "506" ], [ "> you would think a loving family and friends around her would get her out of the depression.\n\nI know this as well, but... \n\nIn this case, the kid WANTED to do BJJ/MT. You know how rare it is for someone with actual clinical depression to WANT to do something. \n\nAnd we know how rewarding BJJ feels. How all-encompassing it is, mentally. You don't have time to worry about anxiety or give a shit about life. It's like the external world doesn't exist. It's extremely therapeutic for people who have depression. \n\nGETTING a depressed person to give a shit about BJJ might be impossible, but for someone who already wants to do BJJ and is looking for a place.. I'd say the odds are good. Really good.", "739" ], [ "Maybe. This also sounds like a new addition to his life, as opposed to something that was already part of her life. \n\nAlso... Apples and oranges. I think BJJ is a lot more all-engrossing than training dogs. To be fair, I don't know shit about training dogs. But BJJ is the kind of thing you can think about *all day long* and get nowhere. Training dogs.. I mean, I don't think it functions the same mentally.", "958" ], [ "Rank inflation would not occur if you, as I said, hit MMR in a zero-sum manner. Of course, rank inflation occurs through win streaks, and win streaks would be made more likely by such a system, but that's really another issue altogether. \n\nIf you suddenly lost 500 MMR, it's very likely you would gain it back (because you're now playing with people who are, on average, 500 MMR worse than you). However, that doesn't mean you're inflating your MMR... You're just taking away their MMR. \n\nBasically, this system would stall your ranking up and punish everyone a bit lower than you at the cost of benefitting everyone who was around your original MMR. It's a bad system.", "197" ], [ "It isn't wrong. Bubble also removes antiheal for 100% certain. Cast on an ally, it also dispels their Hacked status (though you obviously can't put it on yourself when hacked, for the obvious reason...). And I'm about 95% sure it also removes discord orb, though that may be incorrect. \n\nWhether it actually \"removes\" stuff like antiheal or simply \"suppresses\" it might be a different matter. Eg, if a friendly Ana hits you with nade 3s into the last Ana's nade, you'll still be purple until the enemy nade wears off, but then you'll be golden and take +healing. This is because the purple \"suppressed\" the golden, not completely dispeled it. \n\nBut I'm pretty sure it's just a dispel and not a suppress.", "991" ], [ "You ever play an older game, like D2, where players would do dumb shit like vendoring rare items because their buddy told them it'd actually (super secret rare shit here)? \n\nThey're like urban legends in games. You don't really believe most of them since they're preposterous, but crazier things have happened (eg, PSO name seeding), so you do them if they're not too burdensome. \n\nFor instance, your buddy tells you that your next hearthstone pack has twice the chance at legendaries if you open the shop and close it before opening the pack. Meh, not very likely, but it only costs you about 5 seconds to try it. Other friend tells you that holding A+B+Down helps increase the chance at catching pokemon with pokeballs... Again, not very likely, but it doesn't hurt to try it! \n\nThis is because people are inclined to see patterns and shit where they don't exist. \"Oh man, I held A+B+Down that one time and caught Zapdos... I think I'm onto something!\" This sort of confirmation bias leads people to ignore the times when the facts don't meet their expectations. \n\nThis is relevant because there is a huge amount of threads like this one and comments that second guess the whole system because there are a lot of myths/rumors/urban legends surrounding the systems. People start making up wild shit and then everyone starts testing the theory. It seems to work sometime for people and they believe it, so A+B+Down suddenly seems pretty believable. \n\nBut they already confirmed an MMR at blizzcon, and honestly it seems really obvious that MMR is in the game once you look at it.", "935" ], [ "> It trivializes the real BLM movement\n\nYou mean the super fucking racist one that's led by terrorists and shit? \n\nThat movement should be trivialized until it dies, with its shitty leaders shamed into suicide. Then we can start a REAL movement led by people who want EQUALITY and don't just aimlessly hate whites and the police. \n\nWe aren't just making fun of stupid snowflakes. We're trivializing a shitty movement spearheaded by racist assholes and supported by other racist assholes (*and some people with good intentions who unfortunately have no better cause to latch onto*) and people's OVERREACTION to said joke. \n\nEg, in your example, if someone's shirt said \"Drinkin' Strong\" for St. Patty's Day to show that they moved on from the Boston Bombings and are partying to show that they're gonna live it up, some people might consider it offensive (while others would consider it a victory: the purpose of terrorism is to distract us from our lives), but we'd still mock anyone who openly says shit like, and I quote, \"I was almost blown over.\"", "577" ], [ "> highly decentralized from the start\n\nIts shittiness is inherent in its leaders as well, and given that you contrasted it against \"far-right echo chambers\" makes me think you think that BLM is a leftist movement. \n\nLeftists with any pride would shame BLM for all the bad it brings to legitimate movements, just as they would shame these neo feminists and transtrenders. Being a social leftist, which I am (libertarianism = social left fiscal right), means wanting equality for people to live their lives their own way. It DOES NOT mean that we should be murdering the police or saying fuck all white people they should all die, as can be seen **as high up as BLM leadership**. \n\nIf you want equality, great, so do I. The first thing you should do is distance yourself from scummy SJW movements like BLM and neofeminism.", "285" ], [ "> Considering that the movement was about the disproportionate amount of unarmed black people killed in altercations with police\n\nand was lead by fucking terrorists who say death to white people and cops, yeah, the whole thing is washed away. \n\nMaybe that's unfair, but movements are the sum of their parts. Don't like it? Start a new movement, lead it vocally, be selective, and openly denounce those who do shit that is not your mission. \n\nPeople sure railed on <PERSON> for not denouncing the KKK imperial wizard fast enough, but BLM leadership embracing cop killers and anti-white sentiments gets a \"Well there are always some bad apples in the bunch...\" treatment.", "577" ], [ "Echoing opinions that consider both sides and weigh them against each other is inherently superior to echoing a shitty opinion where you accept no dissenters. \n\nWe don't hate BLM because we're racists. As far as I can tell, we support equal rights as a whole. We hate BLM not only because it's a shitty movement but also because *they damn their own cause through bad behavior and shitty management, being led by demonstratable racists who are happy when white cops are killed*. \n\nIf there were a better alternative to BLM, with real, non-racist leadership (and not handwavey excuses like \"Oh it's too decentralized....\"), we'd be supporting it. \n\nActual racists wouldn't support the movement no matter how it was laid out, because, to them, black lives DON'T matter. SJWs will support the movement no matter what it does because, to them, white people are shitlords anyway. \n\nWe will support movements that make sense and denounce the ones that are garbage. We are not a leftist or rightist echo chamber. We're people who consider the good with the bad and then sponsor or denounce movements accordingly. And since we're all reasonably intelligent people who can articulate our opinions and why we have them, we tend to convince each other to agree. \n\nOf course, any echo chamber is going to say the same -- they convinced each other -- but this simply isn't true. Their collective opinions fall in line with their political views regardless of how extreme or ridiculous their beliefs are. This subreddit supports a wide variety of ideals from both left and right, and this can be seen in tons of comments.", "577" ], [ "Ah. Assumed the \"upvotes\" param was that a certain number of people who have the addon installed (I assumed a bunch of SJWs got together and installed this addon another SJW made and they can all flag people as nazis and the others could view it clientside) voted me as a Nazi. Ie, one upvote = one person thinking I'm a nazi. Two = two people think I'm a nazi, and so on. \n\nSo you're telling me this retard actually LIKED something I said, and so someone glancing at the file might misinterpret that (like I did) into thinking I'm a nazi. Cool", "743" ], [ "Well I certainly wasn't trying to indicate that people are more \"passionate\" about one passion than another. Moreso that BJJ, being chess-like, involves very IN-THE-MOMENT training, followed by tons of \"what if I did < X > ?\" and \"Hmm I should look up something to counter that\" and mental drilling and stuff like that. Constant MENTAL absorption, to the point where you can think about it and ignore everything else. I don't know if dog training is the same way - if dog trainers sit around going \"Hmm, maybe I should try the dogfood method... No no, that won't work, they're already 6 years old!\" \n\nBut yeah, like I said - I don't know shit about training dogs, so I'm not trying to speak as any kind of authoritative source here. I'm just going from my experience with other passions (eg, baking). I really love baking, but the reality is that when I'm not actively baking I don't have much to think about it other than what I may try baking next or maybe a new thing to add (exciting!). \n\nContrast that against other hobbies, like hacking (I'm an infosec engineer). There's a big mental aspect, and sometimes when I'm reversing a file or trying to come up with a way to get shell on a system in an engagement, I can sit around for hours just mentally re-exploring the possibilities. \n\nLike I said, I don't know shit about dog training, so maybe it's like hacking/BJJ, or maybe it's like baking. I honestly don't know. My intuition says baking, but you'd obviously know more than me.", "996" ], [ "Then why is this a question? If you haven't eaten a pineapple in three months but are hungry for some pineapple, would you be making posts online asking if it's been too long? \n\nI don't know how old you are, but the reality is that the biggest hole in your training was before you started. Probably 15, 20, 25, or 40+ YEARS of your life were spent before you even started BJJ. If that wasn't enough to deter you from walking into the gym on day 1, then 3 months sure as fuck shouldn't be.", "412" ], [ "> my first thought wouldn't be that a good regimen of BJJ would help. i would recommend professional help.\n\nI mean, to be fair, nobody said it was their \"first thought\" or some kind of silver bullet. For all we know, that kid was already getting professional help but still just felt life was meaningless. Or maybe they lack friends to begin with, and could've used the BJJ they were already interested in to meet some friends, who would later recommend medical help. \n\nSomething is better than nothing. Considering the kid killed himself without BJJ, there's no way BJJ would have hurt.", "357" ], [ "> But I also partially am choosing to let them linger for security reasons (it's comforting to know I have a way out if I choose to), not because I don't have a choice\n\nI mean... I always consider suicide an option. But I consider it an option in the same way that TECHNICALLY cutting my leg off for no reason is an option. I can do it. The only thing stopping me is me. But I'm not even considering it. I don't want to. I've never wanted to. \n\nI've never been suicidal. I've never had suicidal thoughts. But I sure as hell always consider it an option. I don't understand why you must associate \"having suicidal thoughts\" and \"letting them linger\" with the concept of \"always having the option.\"", "168" ], [ "So you're ultimately saying you agree with me, right? Because that was my whole point. Cutting off my leg is always an option. Suicide is always an option. But just because I'm keeping those options in my back pocket should the time ever arise to use them (bear trap, unBEARable life, too many bear puns, etc), I'll exercise them. \n\nBut that doesn't mean I'm a self-harmer at risk of cutting off my own leg on a whim. It also doesn't mean I have \"suicidal thoughts\" (as whoever I was responding to claimed). \n\nI'm simply saying that \"knowing that suicide is always an option\" is a passive thing. Having suicidal thoughts is more of an active thing. \n\nThe leg thing is an analogy: I *could* always cut off my leg, and some day if it's trapped in a bear trap I will definitely *consider* that action. But I can honestly say I **never, ever** consider that action in my normal day-to-day life. That is exactly how I am with suicide. I **never, ever** consider suicide in my day-to-day life, not even when I am sad, but that doesn't mean I've rejected it as an option.", "168" ], [ "Part of both. Clarifying that I don't understand why objectification is inherently bad and that I don't think it happens specifically to one gender; ie, I'm saying I don't think it's a rpoblem. \n\n*How to treat people in most situations* is not objectification. Grabbing your co-worker's ass, while sexual harrassment, isn't objectification by your own definition. Making your employee dress like a sex object so men can ogle them might be, but there's a whole industry of that with very willing employees. \n\nAnd even if objectification is bad, which I don't really think it is, I don't think objectification is anywhere near as bad as assault.", "181" ], [ "What you just described *does* sound like suicidal thoughts, however... \n\n > But I also partially am choosing to let them linger for security reasons (it's comforting to know I have a way out if I choose to), \n\nWhat you just said is NOT that. Having a natural inclination to assume suicide is the best option until you fight that belief off **is not the same** as just passively thinking suicide is always an option. \n\nI consider suicide as an option. It's my ace up my sleeve. It's my plan Z. But it sounds like, for you, sometimes your intuition tells you it's plan A, and you need to remind yourself it isn't. That's a distinct difference IMO.", "168" ], [ "To be clear, you're talking about the background red circle moving, not the foreground \"oozing\" into existence, right? \n\nIMO, your easiest and most efficient bet would be to simply load that red circle crap in as a sprite, give it an offset that is not in the exact center (e.g., something like `x = 0.75w; y = 0.25h`) and then do `image_angle++` every frame. \n\nBUT if you're really set on learning the math, then what you're going to need to do is trigonometry. I'll give you a basic proof of concept and you can work it out from there. \n\n(let's define some stuff within `Created`): \n\n // full circle every 180 frames -- 3 seconds\n #macro ANGLE_INCREASE 2*pi/180\n \n // arbitrary: \n #macro SPIRAL_RADIUS 32\n \n // arbitrary: \n self._centered_x = 300\n self._centered_y = 300\n\n(every `Step`* event): \n\n var self._angle = (self._angle + ANGLE_INCREASE) % (2 * pi)\n self.x = self._centered_x + SPIRAL_RADIUS * cos(self._angle)\n self.y = self._centered_y - SPIRAL_RADIUS * sin(self._angle)\n\nThat should more-or-less get the effect you want. \n\nPS. Although the `% (2 * pi)` is superfluous (since cos/sin loop), I've occasionally read that some languages handle sin()/cos() with very large inputs slowly for some reason. YMMV", "53" ], [ "Limit how much the healthbar can change per frame. \n\nFor example, you say you're stretching a 1px wide sprite. Let's say you're stretching it across 400px to make math easier. I assume you are drawing it equal in length the the ratio of the player's health divided by their max health. For example, I assume your code looks something like this: \n\n var percent = player.hp / player.max_hp\n var bar_width = 400 * percent\n // draw bar with \"bar_width\" as the xscale\n\nThe problem is that if the player loses 50% of their HP, it's going from 400 pixels to 200 pixels instantly. But maybe you only want it to lose, let's say, at most 10 pixels per frame. You can do this via: \n\n1. Save old width \n2. Increment/decrement by no more than 10 pixels per frame until you reach new width \n\nFor example: \n\n(within `Create` event):\n\n // limit bar changes to 10px per frame\n #macro MAX_BAR_CHANGE 10\n \n // and initialize an \"old bar width\" var\n self._old_bar_width = 0 // 0 is arbitrary; will make it look like your HP is \"filling up\" on game start\n\n(within `Draw` event): \n\n // Determine our \"target\" bar width\n var percent = player.hp / player.max_hp\n var target_bar_width = 400 * percent\n \n // Figure out if we're moving up or down\n var bar_move_dir = sign(target_bar_width - self._old_bar_width)\n \n // Positive movement (we gained HP recently)\n if (bar_move_dir > 0)\n {\n var bar_width = min(self._old_bar_width + MAX_BAR_CHANGE, target_bar_width)\n }\n // Negative movement (we lost HP recently)\n else if (bar_move_dir < 0)\n {\n var bar_width = max(self._old_bar_width - MAX_BAR_CHANGE, target_bar_width)\n }\n // No movement (no net HP change recently)\n else\n {\n var bar_width = target_bar_width\n }\n \n // Now you draw with `bar_width` as the xscale here\n \n // And at the end, save the bar width as the \"old bar width\"\n self._old_bar_width = bar_width\n\nShould more-or-less accomplish what you want.", "991" ], [ "Indeed you did need to remove `var` (the `self.` prefix indicates that it's an instance variable, not a local (`var`) variable), which means you also had to define `self._angle` within `Created` (or elsewhere) to initialize it. My apologies. Whipped it up quickly without proofreading haha. \n\nGlad it's working! I tried to give the variables self-evident names, but here's a quick explanation of each one. \n\n`ANGLE_INCREASE` - the speed at which the image moves in a circle. If you increase this number, it will spin more rapidly. If you make this number negative, it will spin in a clockwise fashion instead of counter-clockwise. \n\n`SPIRAL RADIUS` - this changes how big of a circle it'll be. With a small number (like 1) it will barely move in a circle. With a very big number (like 200) it will swing very wide as it spins. \n\n`self._centered_x` & `self._centered_y` - changes the 'center' of the spiral \n\nGood luck on making your game, bud!", "53" ], [ "Back when BTC hit ATH and Nano was at $1.40, I put in a buy order for some Nano at 5100 satoshis. It hasn't filled yet, but it's come close a handful of times. \n\nI'm optimistic about BTC's future and I can't imagine Nano will die, at least the writing isn't on the wall for Nano's death yet, so I'm interested and I think it's a good time to buy if you're going to get it on the cheap.", "928" ], [ "What are you talking about? <PERSON> treats him like a captain, too. The way he responded to saving <PERSON> in Alabasta is an example of that. The way he got beat up with <PERSON> in Jaya. He never questions ANY of <PERSON>'s orders. \n\nThe *one* and *only* time he ever bit back to <PERSON> in a non-joking way was with regards to forgiving <PERSON> for leaving the crew without apologizing, when he said he would leave the crew next if <PERSON> doesn't need to apologize. \n\nThe statement was impactful in both directions. It showed how seriously he valued the crew as a crew, such that should anybody else treat it as a temporary thing, he would leave it **permanently**. \n\nEverything else, he more-or-less blindly followed <PERSON>'s orders.", "942" ], [ "There have been countless good stories. Maybe even countless *better* stories. I've never even heard of a twist as great as this. I would be completely and utterly shocked. \n\n<PERSON> could absolutely die and not become <PERSON>. His ambition for becoming PK is so simple: \"to be the freest man in the world.\" It isn't like he has some grand aspiration after-the-fact to maintain his power to change the world or something. He could absolutely die in the final stretch. \n\nHe won't. Let's be real. We know he won't. But if <PERSON> did it, I bet he could pull it off and make it something truly spectacular.", "942" ], [ "> <PERSON> being revealed to be alive would actively harm <PERSON> as an antagonist, \n\nI don't think so. <PERSON> is like the *anti-Luffy*, the \"equal and opposite <PERSON>.\" <PERSON> could be a totally different brand of dickhead. \n\n > and would also invalidate other <PERSON> in many ways. \n\nI have mixed feelings. I<PERSON> didn't invalidate the <PERSON> (for me), but I also agree with what you're trying to say underneath it all. \n\nAnd I agree with you. I would prefer to see some twist on it than just \"Rocks be old as fuck\"", "768" ], [ "<PERSON> is too irrelevant of a character to make these claims. Joking is not in her personality, and it isn't a show of respect that she never jokes. \n\nShe also does say negative things about <PERSON> in more of a passive way, like \"He's quite the character\" instead of \"He's a moron.\" \n\n<PERSON> has had like 1 fight - <PERSON> - and we've basically never seen her pushed with her back against the wall since EL. There's almost never been a moment where she had to really show her loyalty to her Captain in like over a decade. She tends to show it in other ways. \n\n<PERSON> is my 2nd favorite SH (after <PERSON>), but I'm sorry she doesn't hold a candle compared to <PERSON> in this regard. If anything, it's a **stronger** demonstration from <PERSON> for how much he respects <PERSON> as his leader that he's *normally* so strong-willed and resistant to outsiders while *unquestioningly* bending knee for <PERSON> when given an order.", "1007" ], [ "> Don't give kids a felony for a harmless prank.\n\nBut they committed a felony? \n\nWhy does being kids matter? \n\nCan I go do what they did and just get a slap on the wrists? Why/why not? \n\nIf I can -- then you want some kind of anarchy shithole where everyone can commit garbage \"victimless crimes\" (except for all the taxpayers whose money is being wasted). \n\nIf I can't -- why not? \n\nBecause I'm an adult and should be held to a higher standard? Why are we applying standards to the law? I contribute a lot to society (great job & lots of tax money), whereas these kids are obviously losers who have netted nothing but a cost to society. So I deserve a bigger punishment? \n\nBecause of \"maturity\"? Guess what, and this may shock you: I was a kid once and I didn't do this kind of stupid shit. Because I knew that it was wrong to waste taxpayer money. \n\nThey didn't even do it for a good reason. \"To get attention online\" is fucking pathetic. \n\nBleeding heart bullshitters like you are the cause behind so many problems in this world.", "282" ], [ "This is the shittiest take ever \n\n > Why the everliving fuck would you ruin their lives for this? \n\nWhy not? Because they're \"teenagers\" and \"don't know any better\"? \n\n > It's not a rape, it's not an assault, a larceny, NOTHING WAS DAMAGED AND NO ONE WAS HURT.\n\nWhy would rape/assault matter if they're just \"dumb teenagers\"? Retards like you would advocate not to punish a rapist 14 year old because \"HE'S JUST A KID!\" \n\n > This is a misdemeanor at worst, not a felony, \n\nTrespassing on taxpayer property is already a felony. What they've done here is legally a felony. You're just trying to use the word \"misdemeanor\" to indicate \"not that bad\" but you obviously have no idea what a felony is. \n\n > A felony including 1-5 years in jail and lost rights is not a proportionate response. \n\nIf they **committed** a felony then they should be **charged** with a felony. It's that simple. \n\nAnd \"lost rights\"? ROFL I don't want these fucking retarded kids voting for the president. Thanks.", "24" ], [ "> it would be fucked up to discourage similar fun/pranks.\n\nSpoken like a true teenager. Go actually pay some taxes and your opinion will change. \n\nThankfully, I feel a great sense of relief knowing that these loser fuckwad kids will grow up to be poor ass adults and then spend their lives rallying for more taxpayer money spent to them to take care of them that they'll never get. There's a certain amount of karma in knowing that all the lazy fucking loser kids grow up to be poor loser adults who then look for hand-outs.", "282" ], [ "> This argument has never made sense to me because of that. I've gotta assume these people who hate shows with audience laughter must also hate literally all stand up comedy, otherwise they're hypocrites. Or they're just completely humourless.\n\nThe bigger problem is that comedians are often *actually funny* and sitcoms are often *not funny*. \n\nWhen I tune into <PERSON> and he tells a banger that has me laughing for 5 seconds, I don't mind the audience pans for an extra 8 more. It builds suspense for his follow-up. \n\nWhen I watch some garbage sitcom say \"Now who ate all the cornbread!\" and the audience uproars for 20 seconds, the pauses become more like boring fillers where they're almost telling me \"Hey, that was a joke! You should laugh!\" \n\nFWIW: this isn't hypocritical at all. If I tune into an unfunny comedian and I watch them tell some boring ass joke that makes the audience laugh for like 15 seconds, the wasted time with the audience laughter is all the more reason for me to bore out and swap to something else. \n\nLong story short: laugh tracks are ONLY acceptable when you also think the thing is funny, and just irritating otherwise. \n\nAnd FWIW the bigger problem is *misusing* laugh tracks. I never minded as much when watching a real live studio audience laugh over a joke that's pretty funny as much as I mind when there's a bunch of fake laughter after some really unfunny joke.", "367" ], [ "Fair, but Spanish / Korean are my second/third languages. The punctuation for those languages is more-or-less the same as with English, and this: \n\n > The Impact here was so high because the Facebook workers used to login with their workplace accounts, Which mean they’re using their Facebook accounts access token, and maybe if another attacker wanted to exploit this it might give him the ability to gain access to some Facebook workers accounts .. etc \n\nThis wouldn't fly. Random shit capitalized? Commas instead of periods? Incomplete thoughts as sentences? \n\nThese are core grammar rules that span multiple languages. I don't know what this guy's first language was, but I would be very surprised if he is very eloquent in it. \n\nAnd FWIW I think a lot of native speakers also communicate like shit. Memes about engineers being bad at English are common and accepted, but should be unacceptable.", "930" ], [ "I think your whole point is a pretty shit take. Crime being profitable is nothing new, but there's no reason that crime should be *so* profitable compared to being a good person. \n\nIf you could sell an exploit for $8mil but the company paid $750k, you're still taking a 90%+ haircut to \"do the right thing.\" It's a big fee, but perhaps a small price to pay for morals, less risk, no need to launder, and the ability to take public credit for the vuln. \n\nBut if you could sell an exploit for $8mil or the company will pay you $2,000, that's a fucking slap in the first for multiple reasons: \n\n1. You may need to choose between doing the right thing (by your morals/society) and doing the right thing (to secure your family's well-being and put the god damn bread on the table) \n2. It discourages white-hats from bothering to look, knowing that their only two options are \"crime or simp pay.\" Which means that the only people who will continue looking are the people we DON'T want looking. \n\nHence his entire point: \n\n > Bug bounties are such a joke, would have sold it to a private buyer for six figures minimum and not think twice about it.", "314" ], [ "Definitely as retarded as u/throeeed suggested. \n\nThe price for security scales with the price of what you are trying to protect. To use your own shitty example, do you think some homeless guy is going to spend $7,500 to lock up his tent? How about a home owner, spending $7,500 to lock up their home? How about a company owner, spending $7,500 to lock up their business? And a government, spending $7,500 to secure their nation? \n\nLike hur dur no shit the price of a butler or an apple doesn't scale with wealth. But when you are worth 10x as much value, you will have 10x as many people, or people who are 10x as skilled, or people who might be 10x as motivated. You need protection from 10x as many people, or people who are 10x as skilled, and you need to pay them commensurately or suffer from a lack of willing aid. \n\nIf you think that this is acceptable, watch as more and more white hats don't give any fucks about bug bounties. The only people left to find the vulns will be the people who want to steal the data. At least FB can then pat themselves on their backs for doing their \"due diligence\" -- it isn't like it's THEIR data that is stolen.", "779" ], [ "The only people who would be so adamantly against suggesting crime as an alternative are people with no meaningful skills to speak of. If you actually had spent 30 years developing meaningful skills and received pennies for it, knowing you could make 6-7 figures with crime, then you would resort to crime. \n\nDon't give a fuck what you think your morals are like when it comes down to putting food on the table from your family that you can't afford because some company makes 8 billion dollars per year by connecting people together to post inane bullshit on their profiles. This is the reality. People WILL resort to crime, and the dude isn't somehow less correct just because the idea of crime hurts your feelers. \n\nIf you actually gave a shit about preventing crime and also gave a shit about security, you would shame shit corps that do shit like this. They only discourage people with skills from meaningfully contributing to the space.", "633" ], [ "> Not everyone is motivated by money.\n\nPeople with skills are. \n\nNo hacker worth his salt is going to simp for a corp for free. Either do the world a favor and either hack a shithole government for free or do yourself a favor and hack a corporation for cash. Hacking corporations *basically* for free so they can sell our data is the saddest shit.", "941" ], [ "I dunno, maybe he was here because people did a username ping on him (e.g. u/blahblah) which put it into his inbox and got people to message him? And he's just randomly here sometimes. I don't talk to him. Do you not remember when I made the rule post saying xposts to r/CC were totally OK and he banned me from r/CC for it? \n\nThe rule post was only about SatoshiBets and AltStreetBets. Look at it. It wasn't about r/CC. And I did it because the Nano spam there got _so bad_ that literally the entire front page of SB was Nano posting at one point and I was getting reports on Nano people harrassing mods. \n\nAlso, [I was not the one who added automod stopping people from saying his name](_URL_0_).", "621" ], [ "I think that you've really bastardized the idea, but you started strong lol \n\nWhile it's true that it's possible to be overdiversified, and putting 1% into everything would just more-or-less provide the relatively boring market-rate returns (i.e., S & P 7-8% YoY kind of shit), putting _your entire net worth_ into a single pick is a YOLO. \n\nConsider this: \"Double or Nothing\" is a scam, because you can win 10x in a row but it only takes 1 loss before you're out of the game for good. It really should be \"Double or Half\" to be fair, assuming coinflip odds. \n\nThe players that I've seen who won big (consider [Cornwall Capital](_URL_0_)) tended to put no more than ~25% of their portfolio into a single trade, no matter how much they believed in it. \n\nMore conservative venues (see r/investing or even r/thetagang) would consider 25% into a single investment a YOLO, while WSB would likely consider it pussy shit. That's how you know it's a sweet spot. \n\nAll the same, IMO it basically isn't worth following that strategy unless you have around $100k or more. If you're working with a few hundred or a few thousand, you're better off putting ALL your research into 1 thing and winning big. Worst case scenario, you blow up your account and just fund a new one in the future. This is because an asymmetry exists between your account size when compared to your yearly income from other sources.", "507" ], [ "I'll take the occasional 1-2% burns from hitting stop orders prematurely due to volatility for the times where your stop loss doesn't hit and you don't ride Nano back down from $4.50 to $3.00 for the 4th time. Even if your stop loss is hit 75% of the time prematurely, you only tend to lose out on the exchange rates (~0.2% for both directions of the trade), whereas the other 25% you end up winning bigtime when the asset lurches 20% into the favorable direction.", "511" ], [ "> But outside of crypto I have many other investments that increase my diversification and it balances out\n\nThis is my attitude as well. My 401k is largely in S & P500. My Roth IRA is largely in ARK ETF's. My fun money is largely in meme YOLO options plays. My crypto money (other fun money) is partially in BTC (wallet), partially in Nano (wallet), partially in Eth (wallet), and a liquid stack to play with. \n\nMy \"liquid stack\" has grown slowly over time, because what I did basically works like this: \n\nPretend you start with 31 Nano. You put 30 into your wallet and leave out 1 Nano for play. \n\nSwingtrade with it. Have fun with it. It's only 1 Nano. You can't fuck up too badly. Take risks. You have basically instant liquidity. You can swingtrade this well and learn well. \n\nBefore long, that 1 Nano will become 11 Nano. At that point, you put 10 into the wallet and continue playing with 1 Nano. Now your net total is 41 Nano. \n\nContinue playing until you end up with 51, 61, 71... you can never \"blow up\" your Nano, really. It'll never hit 0. Play with dumb meme PnD shit and do what you want, and then bring it back into Nano. \n\nEventually you break 110 Nano, so now you work with a set of 10 Nano and try to turn it into 100, before putting that next 100 into your wallet, and continuing the game with a fresh 10. \n\nThen you break 1100 Nano. So your initial stack now is 100. \n\nThere's a sweet spot depending on your trading skills and due to low liquidity where making a profit becomes harder on a bigger stack (more to lose, more emotions, more impatience, slower buys/sells) and so your natural %rate of return decreases substantially as you get more Nano. \n\nInfinite money glitch 101", "509" ], [ "Timing the market doesn't take _that_ much time. Hell, if you took 1 Nano out right now and sold it and put in a buy order for $4, you're basically making a bet on \"Nano will someday see $4 again.\" \n\nAnd that 1 Nano becomes worth 1.1 Nano. \n\nDuring the last BTC crash, I bought in just before it crashed. $3k. Had I never traded anything, what I bought would now be worth around $1k. Had I never traded anything after my first ever Nano purchase, it would be worth around.... $900.", "937" ], [ "It isn't about them. I don't know them or personally care about them at all. It's about what I think makes the Nano community _look bad_. Some of the activity I saw on SB made the Nano community look like the Doge community. I would rather have no advertising than negative advertising. I don't want to look like the PnD shitcoin that some members of the community make us look like. I don't want to be associated with the crowd of people who FOMO bad decisions to chase pumps and then badmouth the coin afterwards as a scamcoin. \n\nIt also isn't _my_ sub. I'm not the head mod here. I'm not even a second mod here. I am basically the _very bottom_ of the mod list. I'm behind people that I've never even seen on this sub before. I can't just give you guys free reign to do whatever you want. \n\nRemember the post that I made saying to go buckwild on r/CC as long as you didn't violate Reddit's sitewide rules? That was deleted by another mod. The automod rule that prevents you guys from saying jwintern's name? That was added by another mod. I'd just be removed as a mod for reverting these things. \n\n_Within the sub_ I'd be fine with a lot of crap. _Outside of the sub_ I only don't want (1) people breaking Reddit's sitewide rules and getting us in trouble (even if I think Reddit's sitewide rules are garbage) or (2) people making the community look like a shitcoin shillcoin community.", "621" ], [ "Fair enough. It depends heavily on your startup capital. My original stack was 200 Nano. Even if Nano hit $2000, $400k would not be meaningfully life-changing to me. It wouldn't really do _anything_ for me. \n\nDue to trading, I now have ~12k in an _active trading_ stack, and more held in surplus on the side that I don't trade with at all. If I fuck up even 75% of this and somehow burnt my entire cold stack, I'd end up with 3k Nano... at $2k/ea, it'd be 6 million. That's enough to change my life. \n\nIf I had started with 20k Nano, I might have had a different outlook. I certainly find myself trading less aggressively than I used to. My perceived risk is greater. The size of my cold stack grows over time. \n\nFWIW, though, as you trade more and get used to it, with properly managed risk, you stop stressing about it. For example, yesterday I probably spent less than 3 cumulative minutes looking at Nano charts, but I made 2 trades during that time. I know a lot of holders that look at charts a lot more than that.", "928" ], [ "Sigh. \n\nI knew a guy who replaced an old HDD and just left his old one in his cabinet or some shit for a decade without migrating the data. Had a digimoney wallet in it with like fucking 80k digimoney.\n\nHe tried getting it recovered when digimoney first broke like $1k and he heard about it, but it was too old.\n\nNever stopped bitching about it and just started drinking more. Haven't spoken to him in a year or two, but I think he's unemployed now and his life turned to shit.\n\nAhh, good times.", "527" ], [ "> <PERSON> is currently getting fucked up because of his chivalry, but if it was a guy he was fighting, and a powerful one at that, I doubt he would lose.\n\nI mean, <PERSON> was pretty weak and he kinda bodied <PERSON>. You're acting like <PERSON> was top notch YC level, but he was more like.. Doffy underling level. \n\n<PERSON> > > <PERSON> > > <PERSON> > > <PERSON> > > > <PERSON> > <PERSON> \n\nYeah, man, I dunno. Maybe <PERSON> would be able to handle pre-TS CP9 Kaku at his current strength. A shame that he didn't actually train at all during TS. \n\n > <PERSON> will basically stay at the same level until the end \n\nAll the old fucks keep getting stronger. <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, etc. You're acting like <PERSON> is past his prime. Nah. <PERSON>'s just a has-been. <PERSON> has overtaken him, I'm afraid.", "40" ], [ "No. Gamma squeezes are not made up lol \n\nThey're just absurdly, insanely rare. They're a squeeze against an unhedged MM. \n\nWhat caused the squeeze was the fact that GME price went from basically $42 to $60 over the course of like... 30 fucking minutes, about 30 minutes prior to option closure. \n\nMM's were hedged for GME ending the week around $42, and within an hour had to buy enough shares to cover the sudden ENORMOUS influx of calls that became ITM. \n\nThat week was also a LEAP week, too, so it had a much higher amount of calls than normal. It was the perfect storm.", "928" ], [ "> but thought it was too obvious and must have been discussed by the devs already.\n\nThis idea was actually something I came up with in 2018 after about 2 months of back-and-forth. It's actually 2 ideas (TaaC & PoS4QoS), because neither solves both types of spam attacks (rich actor, sybil) on their own. \n\nI basically came up with both independently and discarded them independently about a dozen times each (as well as others, heh) because of their shortcomings until I _eventually_ realized that they covered each other's weaknesses perfectly. \n\n > Eg. if a Nano account had more than 1000N it would entitle that account to send a high number of transactions per second, something like 5 TPS, whereas a Nano account with less than 0.001N would have their transactions limited to maybe once every 10 seconds. \n\nYes. If you read through some of the other comment threads in this post (there are many), I've given a lot of sample examples with justification. Normal users, for example, do not need even 1 TPS sustained. More likely 0.1 or even 0.01 TPS sustained, with more as a burst. Small businesses would need more, while exchanges would need the most. \n\nThese are the variables `GRACE_PERIOD` and `MINIMUM_GAP`. \n\nIf you browse through the whole thread on the Nano Forum page as well, by the end I start discussing how it's possible to solve the system to mathematically prove that spam attacks are not possible, and the various trade-offs that are required to do so, which are leading me to come up with ideal numbers for these variables. \n\n > I'm not sure if it simplifies things or just makes it more complicated but an obvious follow up question is would this TPS tiered system be any better than what's been suggested already? \n\nThe biggest advantage over previous suggestions is that it only limits TPS during active spam attacks. Outside of active spam attacks, users could dip into the **Normal Queue** (basically: the current network) briefly to refresh their `MAX_BURST` to be able to continue sending a lot of messages. I've given actual line-by-line examples in [some posts in this thread, for example](_URL_1_). \n\n > I understand Nano very generally but I have pretty limited technical knowledge so I don't 100% understand your proposal. \n\nI gave [an ELI5 explanation here](_URL_0_) as well.", "509" ], [ "> Uhhhhh... <PERSON> was all the way back in Punk Hazard.\n\nYeah. <PERSON> hasn't had any fights since then. People don't just \"get stronger\" for existing lol. What, you think he's gotten stronger than <PERSON> just because he's been breathing for the last 5 arcs? \n\n > And <PERSON> has grown - he just hasn't shown it because <PERSON> keeps making him either fight women or focus on protecting someone. \n\nIf he hasn't shown it, how do you know? \n\nAnswer: Confirmation bias. \n\n > You're making it sound like <PERSON> is a weak little bitch, but <PERSON> made him rivals with <PERSON> for a reason. \n\nFor comedic relief. This logic is like saying that <PERSON> is as strong as <PERSON> because they are \"rivals\" lol \n\n > because it sounds like you're set on your point of view \n\nThis all from the guy who literally said that he believes that <PERSON> is super strong despite admitting he \"hasn't shown it.\" You're literally admitting that your beliefs have never been shown lol", "252" ], [ "> Stomping <PERSON> into the pit wouldn't really something <PERSON> would've even considered, I feel like.\n\nSo? \n\nHe was playing with a moral handicap. He was taking an extra beating because he was trying to protect the stone statue girls. Meanwhile, he was intentionally not going all out because he didn't actually want them to be killed. \n\nYou saying \"he held back\" does not prove your case that they were stronger than him lol", "942" ], [ "I see. That's pretty irritating honestly. \n\nBest of luck with you for that, man. Though let me say, from years of playing online games... I've never found it to be a good idea to buy something the moment I could afford it. Better to have that money make me money first. But obviously renting is an irritating situation with no clear answer.", "224" ], [ "Placements are just 10 matches where your MMR is hidden. Nothing else. You still have the same MMR from last season. \n\nTwo seasons ago, I ended mid-Diamond. Last season, my placements went 4-6 and I placed high plat. \n\nMy buddy, two seasons ago, ended very low plat. He went 6-4. He placed low plat. \n\nOther friend, two seasons ago, ended low silver. She went 9-1. Placed mid silver. \n\nMany of those games we played together, too. So basically.. If you ended diamond last season and 6-stack 10-0, you're likely to place Diamond. If you soloQ and go 5-5, you're also likely to place Diamond.", "197" ], [ "Your statement about 120 FPS vs 150 FPS is fair, but comparing 60 FPS to 120 FPS is a bit more enlightening -- 0.016 vs 0.008. \n\nWill a hundredth of a second be the end of the world? No. But if you're suffering a hundredth of a second due to your FPS, and another few hundredths of a second because you aren't using a mechanical keyboard, and another few hundredths of a second because it isn't using [romer-g switches] (_URL_0_), and another hundredth of a second because of your mouse, and another few hundredths of a second because you're using wifi instead of ethernet cable, and... It adds up. \n\nYou can easily reach a tenth of a second. That's a pretty sizeable amount of time to lose if, for example, your reaction speed is 0.5 seconds. That's basically increasing the delay between your reaction and the action by 20%. \n\nAnd a 20% slower reaction can definitely make a difference in GM, M, or even Diamond/Plat. \n\nNow if you're in bronze league... sure, you're right, even a 20% slower reaction isn't your biggest problem. There are more important places to start. \n\nBut this is a far cry from it \"not making a difference.\" It does make a difference, and not just for pros.", "404" ], [ "Nah. They said they did this because they wanted to prevent people from trying to achieve the \"lowest SR possible\" (ie, people intentionally throwing games to reach 0 or 1 SR). It takes away some of their fun by making them just see \"You're less than 500.\" instead of seeing the actual number. Due to the exponential part of the system, you can reach \" < 500\" hundreds of games before you'd actually hit 0 or 1, so they won't find throwing games as fun anymore... That's Blizzard's intent anyway. \n\nThe rest of us won't be affected... outside of, hopefully, running into less throwers I guess.", "197" ], [ "> In some ways I agree with this. I've seen people come in and try jiu jitsu and just get smashed and not want to come back, even if that smashing came from another white belt.\n\nThe other problem can happen as well: someone WANTS to go in and get smashed and learn to smash because that's their whole purpose. They want some serious athleticism and they want to compete. Instead, they get hand-held and can't spar for half of a year and their motivation to train dwindles.", "357" ], [ "> I've had short hair my whole life because when my hair grows past my chin it dies and splits and looks god awful.\n\nIF you ever want long hair, just cut the splitting part and let it continue to grow. Splitting doesn't mean you need to cut off a few inches and retreat back to a safe, known cut. You could just cut off half-an-inch (or less, if you're early with the splitting) and let it continue growing. Hair isn't alive, so it can't/doesn't actually die, so I'm assuming you really just mean it looks terrible when it splits.", "90" ], [ "> The point is that \"producing money\" is not a net benefit to society. \n\nFirst off, uh, yeah it is. That's how economics work. You make money so you can afford to pay for that thing that the other guy makes because he put food on his family's table by selling it. \n\nSecondly, Even if I concede you're right, surely we could at least agree that **being able to take care of oneself** is a net benefit to society. Being on welfare is a net *detriment* to society, so if you can take care of yourself *at least you aren't a burden*. \n\n > There's plenty of degrees outside of the \"useless\" humanities that are extreme detriments to society, yet people for some reason consider those degrees practical. \n\nHumanities are not useless. We just don't need *everybody* doing them. I get it -- they're easy. Science/math stuff takes math skill, which either you have or you worked for. Learning about philosophy takes nothing but basic cognition. A bunch of lazy people want the path of least resistance and are too busy wallowing in their depression/existential crisis to bother learning a skill instead of just pursuing some knowledge for knowledge's sake. \n\nAnd that leads to overcrowding in a field that really doesn't need many people. We don't need 50% of the population trying to be artists and philosophers and shit. \n\nPut another way: my industry (information security) has *20 million* open jobs that cannot be filled. These jobs typically have starting salaries around $70-80k/year. After 5-years, you can become things like lead penetration testers, which make around $165k/year. You could alternatively move into secure software development and push up to $250k/year, or you can keep going the business route and move up as a security manager, director, and even CISO to make far more. \n\n*20 million* open jobs in an industry that is fucking fun (literally computer hacking), but it takes hard work/effort/patience/etc. Meanwhile, a huge number of people are whining that they have no jobs and blaming the government.. Umm, sorry, but we don't really need 100 million employed philosophers and artists and shit. We need people who can contribute skills that the world NEEDS. \n\nKnow why certain jobs don't make money or make shit money? It's because either nobody is willing to *spend* money on that job or *everyone can do it*. Why? If nobody is willing to spend money, it's because *it isn't needed*, and if everyone can do it that means *it's trivially easy* (and has lots of competition).", "246" ], [ "Pretty much nails it, yep. \n\nSee, I don't even know what they're protesting for. FWIW, I didn't know what OWS was protesting for, either. \n\nSome might say that makes me an ignorant fuck, but this is a problem on *their* end. The entire goal of their protests is to organize awareness. **They're basically self-advertising.** \n\nIf you just watched a Gillette commercial and didn't understand that it was about razors/shaving, then is it **your obligation to go and look up wtf Gillette is?** Hell no. You forget about it and move on with your life using your other razors and shit. That's a failure on **their** part. \n\nProtesters need to figure out why the fuck they're marching, with realistic plans (not shit like \"impeach <PERSON>\" or whatever because that isn't even how it fucking works and isn't practical or anything), and **get their fucking message out there.** \n\nAnd tell me what to do! IF you organize a big march saying \"women are oppressed,\" even if I get your message loud-and-clear, I'm going to assume **I'm not the problem.** I'm not personally oppressing women, so it isn't my problem. People who are oppressing women won't care. There are already laws in place to stop oppression, so I dunno what you want politicians to do either. It just sounds like idealistic bullshit **unless you're willing to give me some concrete details about what, EXACTLY, you want me or someone to do.** \n\nFinally, tell me why it's my problem. Maybe this is my cis het white male privilege kicking in, but why is their perceived unfairness any more great than any other unfairness I see in the world? In America alone, I see homeless people, I see insurance companies basically fucking people over, like 8 companies own everything in a huge monopoly, robots taking jobs is a real issue (esp the biggest industry in America - driving), orphaned kids, student loans are rigged against people who are barely old enough to be considered able to consent for sex... Outside of america we have wars, slavery, sex trafficking, shithole nations, crazed radical religions, and all kinds of shit.. Why exactly should some perceived oppression outweigh all of those issues in my mind? \n\nIf they were firehosing american women daily, yeah, I'd fucking get my shit together and help out. But that isn't what's happening, so in future protests they explicitly tell me why they're protesting, what they want, and why it's the single most important thing to do right now. \n\nWithout those requirements, I'm going to ignore it. And yep, maybe that makes me a privileged cis het white male shitlord, but that's the reality. And there are literally millions of other cis het white male shitlords like me. They can either hate us for not doing it their way or they can actually fix their advertising plan to actually reach us.", "281" ], [ "Agreed with u/OCD_Chad. Why *wouldn't* you measure it out? Why would a customer need to go to some review website to figure out the measurements? Did you sign a contract with the reviewer that you would never measure out your own stuff or something to ensure they get traffic? \n\nWhy answer questions daily when you could, instead, improve the website? If I have two potential places to buy and 1 makes me speak with a rep while the other just gives me the information I need... well, you can guess where my money is going.", "460" ], [ "Thanks <PERSON>. \n\nEven if he starts losing 2lbs/week (for all you know, he already is), it'll take him like 6 months to break 200 (assuming he's already 250, and 250+ doesn't mean 280). Should he just quit BJJ for 6 months? \n\nOr maybe Gi companies can stop being so fucking retarded and actually give valuable information to consumers to ensure they make more money? \n\nEven in this day, it's shocking how many retards choose to run a business but don't know shit about what they're doing.", "412" ], [ "Let's pretend for a minute that you can't have both... That means the girlfriend leaves you (because BJJ isn't a person and cannot leave you). Answer one question: \n\n1. Would you be okay with a breakup and then getting a different girl in the future? You're 21, let's be real, you'll get another girl if this one doesn't work. \n2. Would you be okay with a different dream? You're 21, let's be real, you can give up your dreams and make new ones that involve a white picket fence and whatever other bullshit, if it'd make you happy. \n\nPick which one you'd rather replace. If you care more about your dreams, it doesn't matter what you do: whether you pick BJJ or stay with her, you're training either way and she can take it or leave it. If you pick her, you're either giving up BJJ for security in the relationship *or* you're going to continue doing both until it becomes an unavoidable problem (Eg, she breaks up with you). \n\nFigure out what's more important.", "657" ], [ "I double degreed in physics and biochemical engineering. Three years in, I decided I hated those professions. I quit college with neither degree and $50k in student loan debt. \n\nEDIT: I should add, if you're curious, that I regret ever going to college because it was a huge waste of time and money (obviously). You don't need a degree, not even for STEM fields. What you need is a passion (or at least a willingness to fake it). \n\nAny healthy, average individual could get a job in infosec paying upwards of 6 figures within 1-2 years of right now if they put their minds to it (4 hours per day). No degree needed. Pirate books online, read them, download free software (virtualbox/ubuntu) and learn linux. Don't know what books? Look up book recommendations for low-level and mid-level industry certs (compTIA net+, security+, etc to. You don't need to take the cert - just google what books people *recommend* for the cert. DL them, read them, practice them. \n\nFinally, you have no degree to show an employer, but you can show them something better: passion. Take a picture of the massive VM network you set up between your computer and laptop. Show them the mobile app you made that allows you to send stuff to your chromecast from an external network through an Amazon AWS EC2 instance. Show them the source code bot you made for the video game. Link them to your security blog. Show them your bug bounty hunting profile. Link them to the CVE's you've found/reported/published, etc. Any one of these things will **far** outweigh that some kid was able to jerk off for 4 years while getting a compsci degree. \n\nEvery single one of those things is free, and costs about 4 hours per day. If you actually have money and more time, you can cut it down to 6-12 months or less and you can actually get the certs you're learning the content for.", "907" ], [ "So maybe I'm retarded, but I'll bite: **how?** \n\nSeriously. How do I grip fight? Dude has my wrist, so I try pulling it off, but now I gotta 2-on-1 his wrist or I'm just having a strength war with him, right? \n\nAnd what if two-on-one'ing his wrist is bad? Eg, he's got my wrist and he's top mount, and if my other arm comes across to help out I'm just going to get giftwrapped? \n\nEven assuming I can break his grip... Okay, I break his grip on my wrist, so he grabs my lapel. I break his grip there, so now he grabs my wrist again. WTF? When does this cycle of madness end? When he suddenly decides he's done gripping for the rest of the round? \n\nI think there are a lot of undertones here that you're not telling us (like WHAT grips are worth breaking, WHY, HOW to break them, or WHEN to get our own grisp to force **them** on the defensive). A general rule like \"address every single grip they get\" seems like I'm going to just spend all of every match playing patty cake without any idea as to why or how to win.", "525" ], [ "TBF, I have some trans friends who have gotten surgery. I hear MTF surgery is fucking awesome and so realistic that it feels, tastes, etc all real. Some can't get naturally wet enough without some lube, but others can. \n\nIf you fell in love with someone because they looked like a female you were attracted to and now have an (artificial) vagina that would look/feel/function the same, and you didn't want kids anyway, then I can't personally see why it would matter... **logically**. \n\nBut I'll admit.. and I'm not proud to admit it... despite knowing that logic, it'd bother me a bit. Some part of me wouldn't be okay with being with them knowing they were originally a guy and, if they stopped taking medication, would start reverting to being more masculine. That thought kinda grosses me out somehow. \n\nAnd I'm not saying that's OK. I'm just saying that's how it is. And maybe it's society or maybe it's natural to feel this way, I don't know. But that's how it is. And in those *particular* cases, I agree that it isn't right. \n\nFWIW, though, if I fell in love with a trans girl before I knew, I'd probably accept it and get over it. While it's a part of me, it isn't a big enough part of me to take control. \n\nJust saying that there **is** some wiggle room here in some circumstances where there is definitely some underlying bias against dating a trans person even if they look/feel/function like a nonfertile female. It isn't necessarily 100% black and white as \"You look like a girl but got a cock and nope.\"", "390" ], [ "> his feelings would start to manifest in some form\n\nSo it sounds like you're breaking it off more because of the effects his belief would have on your relationship (in particular, how it would manifest; how it would change how he acts). \n\nBut u/ajsmcs2 still has a valid point: would you suddenly become un-sexually-attracted to your partner for that reason? Would you disengage specifically because you now view him as an honest-to-goodness biological female and you, simply, are not a lesbian... or because you expect him to start acting differently in a way that will not make you happy?", "591" ], [ "I was once typing to an asian girl online on a website/game where EVERYONE typed like dogshit. \n\nI said \"Your english is great. It's nice talking to someone who's actually fluent.\" \n\nAnd she was like, um, what the fuck? fluent? um. my family has been here for like FOUR GENERATIONS! okay? and my english blah blah. i cant even speak korean! can you handle that SHOCKER? \n\nAnd I was just like ughhhh godddddddd", "702" ], [ "Is that really a negative thing, though? \n\nLike, black people ARE AWARE there are scummy black people. If you meet a black guy and his english is perfect and you, for some reason, think it's relevant to say so (eg, there are 8 other black guys in your class who talk like shit), isn't he going to take that as a sign of relief that you have mentally distanced him from the shitty others? \n\nI can absolutely see why it could be offensive, but if some foreigner said to me \"Wow! You aren't racist at all!\" (with the implication that all americans are closet racists) I would not be offended on behalf of all americans.", "389" ], [ "I'm saying specifically of the case where the lack of attraction is not due to physical. Nothin' about dicks does it for me. Love wouldn't change that. \n\nBut I'm saying pretend there was an MTF trans and they were super hot. AND they've had surgery, so no penis. Functional vagina. \n\nI'm saying, and this is probably to some degree transphobic, but that **still** wouldn't be enough for me. I wouldn't be able to forget the fact that they were born a guy. I wouldn't be able to forget the fact that I'm sticking my dick into repurposed dick flesh. It'd gross me out. \n\nBut if I love them, I could probably try not to overthink it and get over that transphobia. \n\nAnd that's what I'm saying. To some degree, **that** transphobia does exist. I'm sure other men would feel the same way as I do. And maybe the person should have specified that. \n\nBut yeah, if I were dating some chick for 2 months, loved her, and she goes \"btw I got a cock\"... I'd be fucking bummed out. Would totally feel betrayed/lied to and it would kill my interest in her.", "390" ], [ "Totally agreed with both points. \n\nObviously gender matters and genitalia matters, to both sides. \n\nMy particular example is one where a person can't get over their partner being a trans for no logical reason. For example, would you rather a girlfriend who: \n\nA. Biologically female. Infertile. Naturally low estrogen and she takes pills daily to supplement it. \nB. Biologically male, but trans'ed to female (including genitalia surgery). Her vagina functions, let's say, identically to the biological female (I hear this is very possible/even likely). Needs to take estrogen to maintain her femininity. **She looks the exact same as A.** \n\nI, personally, would prefer A. I think almost every single straight man would prefer A. And many would probably \"strongly\" prefer A. I'm sure many men would pick A even if B were marginally more attractive or marginally smarter. Kinda messed up. \n\nTo me, that's just transphobia. There's no real logic behind why I'd choose A over B. I'm sure you could logic out a few side-reasons that might give a slight preference but... how I **feel** is that I'd rather A. To me, that's my transphobia. And I don't think it's right. I'm sure many people feel this way I do, and I empathize for the trans people who have been on the shit-end of it. \n\nIf the pictured person were sending a message like this, I think that would be well-received. Saying \"who cares about genitalia just fucking love them!!!\" though is obviously retarded.", "390" ], [ "> back handed complement\n\nBefore I get started, let me clarify something: this is not a back-handed compliment. A back-handed compliment is one that's **intended to point out something negative** while dressing it up as positive. For example: \"You sure know how to pound down them cupcakes!\" (to a fat person), or \"I'm impressed that you have the self-confidence to sport that (haircut/outfit/etc)\" (to someone with a haircut/outfit/etc that you think is poor taste). \n\nSo first-things-first: I'm speaking **solely** about when people give it as a genuine compliment. \n\nThat said, the assumption is not necessarily a \"bad\" one -- the speaker does not assume that hispanics may speak poor english because hispanics are \"lesser people\" or \"stupid people\" or anything of the sort. This kind of assumption has much more to do with the speaker's history. \n\nLet me give an example where I pretend you know English and Chinese. Pretend you're in a room with 10 white people. You walk up to the first one and greet them. What language do you do it in? English or Chinese? \n\nYou speak English, because they are more likely to speak English than Chinese. That's an assumption! \n\nSo the first one responds to you with very very broken English. You find out from the 10 of them that they are from Germany. He has a VERY thick accent and it's nearly impossible to understand him. \n\nNext, you greet the second guy. He doesn't even speak English at all. So you ask the first guy to translate your english into German for him. Then the first guy tells you that that second guy actually doesn't speak German, either. He's **from** Germany, but only speaks Russian. Whoops, another assumption! \n\nAs you go down the list, they all speak VERY broken English, or none at all. Finally, you get to the last guy, who speaks English **perfectly**. Now, you either have an assumption like \"English must be his native tongue\" (which can be wrong) OR you have a thought like \"Wow, this guy's english is really good!\" (which, IMO, is a neutral assumption and not offensive, but you say is wrong). \n\nBack to the point: if I grew up in a hispanic neighborhood where literally every single one of them spoke fluent English, I'm going to be somebody who would assume you're going to speak fluent English. If I grew up in a hispanic neighborhood where they all had broken English, I'm going to be surprised to see your english is so good! \n\nThe speaker is not **necessarily** a racist. The speaker does not **necessarily** think less of you or your group. The speaker is not **necessarily** insulting you. The speaker is not **necessarily** giving a backhanded compliment. \n\nI said it in another post in this thread, but I'll mention it here: often on the internet I see people who type like dogshit. Especially on certain games (and even moreso when I was younger and other people were also younger!). When I'd meet the rare person who typed well, I'd say something like \"Wow! Your english is great!\" without any regards to their race/any other meaning. On a site like Reddit, where we're all typing pretty well, I would never randomly say that.. That'd be fuckin' weird. \n\nOne time, on a game just like that when I was younger, I said that comment innocently to an asian girl. NOT because she was asian, but BECAUSE everyone else on the game typed like shit. This led her to give me a big ass rant about how I MUST have felt that way because she's asian, but she's actually Xth generation asian and I'm a huge racist blah blah blah. \n\nPoint is simple: if someone has, either when they were younger or in the recent past, been surrounded by people of your (race/circumstances/appearance/etc) that acted one way, they're going to assume you may be similar. That is not racism, but probability-recognition. They may be somewhat surprised that you are different, and they may comment on it. They are not trying to offend you, and you should not be offended.", "10" ], [ "It's **almost** like that, but the internet **does** have a tone. Not vocal tones, but the way people pause their sentences (commas) and punctuate (3 exclamation points) can indicate implied tones (as can wording, verbosity, transitions, etc). There's also other cues, like situational awareness. \n\nFor situational awareness: you're in a subreddit making fun of tumblr; telling someone to \"stop\" doing something and calling them a \"shitlord\" with 3 exclamation points is done sarcastically 10/10 times here. \n\nFor tones: contrast \"Stop fetishizing black bodies shit lord!!!\" against \"Not to be that guy, but your post kinda fetishes black bodies, dude. It actually makes me a little uncomfortable.\" \n\nThe first is obviously fucking around, and the second seems incredibly genuine.", "633" ], [ "No. This isn't good enough/good advice at all. \n\nSay my opponent has one grip on my collar and one grip on my sleeve. I refuse to do anything until I break both grips, as per u/SimpleBJJ's advice. First, I try breaking the collar. It's impossible because he has a grip on my sleeve. \n\nNext, I try breaking the grip on the sleeve. It takes both hands (putting me in danger, but let's ignore it), but I get it! \n\nNow, you want me to do the following: \n\n1. Establish **2** grips on his other arm. \n2. Break his grip on my collar. \n3. Establish **2** more grips of my own. \n4. \"**do something**\" (whatever this means) \n\nSo, in total, you want me to establish **4** grips (both hands, twice), break one of his grips, **and** \"**do something**\" on top of that, all before my partner re-establishes **1** grip? \n\nNo. Not possible. It is literally impossible to prevent your opponent from gripping things in equal or disadvantageous positions. The second I break one of his grips he's going to be trying to get it back. He'll get it back WAY before I break his second grip. \n\nThere's a priority here. Certain grips must be broken, others can be ignored. Probably changes depending on your gameplan and which of his grips are actually in your way. That **has** to be the way it works, or it makes no sense. \n\nSo back to my original question, for u/SimpleBJJ, how? Need more than just \"break all grips and do something\" because that doesn't work. \n\nAnd if my hunch is right and he's saying \"break the grips in the way of your plans first,\" then I'm back to **how?** Am I supposed to two-on-one grips to break them? Use legs when possible? Torque them off? Am I supposed to change plans to avoid grips, or break grips to force my plan? \n\nGive more technicals behind which grips need breaking and why/how. It's useless to just say \"Oh yeah, keep breaking their grips 1 at a time until you manage to break them both, and then submit them instantly!\"", "525" ], [ "> If I grew in a poor neighborhood in Appalachia, where perhaps people didn't have the best grammar or diction, it would still be odd If I went to college, and upon meeting a white student commented on how good his or her English is.\n\nSure, if you'd already met 500 white students and they all had great English. \n\nBut if you moved to America, knowing nothing about it, and the very first person you met spoke fluent English and this surprised you... That wouldn't be odd at all. \n\nWe're going to need to agree to disagree then. With all due respect, I don't see anything offensive. If your definition of \"bias\" is my definition of \"pattern recognition\" or \"probability\" then we've got a fundamental difference. \n\nAt the end of the day, I'm of the stance that there's enough **true** racism in the world that we shouldn't be getting caught up on small things like whether that well-meaning person should or should not have made that assumption based on their history. Gotta pick better battles. My two cents, anyway.", "5" ], [ "> If I'm not mistaken, <PERSON> didn't quite yet state that she was absolutely going to kill <PERSON> and the gang.\n\nSo her plan is to murder <PERSON> in the cruellest way possible and then let <PERSON> go for no reason? \n\n... Yeah, maybe, actually. Just like <PERSON> broke <PERSON>, maybe <PERSON>'s don't just want to KILL their enemies but, instead, BREAK them. Make them so terrified that they either join the <PERSON> or they give up and head back to Paradise where they spread rumors about how insanely powerful the <PERSON> are.", "474" ], [ "> Clearly I'm speaking of the US population in general\n\nIN GENERAL, the US population goes to work and tries to better themselves - become rich, powerful, successful, influential, etc. \n\nIt's these loser kids who have nothing better to do because they failed at life. They'd rather make up gender problems and all of these other fake issues to blame on white people.", "1020" ], [ "Oh I think people argue over stupid shit, but it's my retarded family. And sometimes it gets really good memeposts. \n\nI think that the bulk of the \"nano going to zero\" shitposting has been banned. Now the arguments are between people who are like \"Yeah I am feeling bullish\" vs others who are like \"I am thinking we'll retrace in the short term\" vs others who get ready for their Forbes interview every time the price moves up by 3%.", "96" ], [ "> People link posts in nanotrade (against reddit rules as usual) and in their weird little echo chambers and come here to \"defend\" nano\n\nI have actually never really seen this. I've seen <PERSON> over in r/nanotrade implying that happens, but I've only ever seen one person link a thread to r/CC encouraging shilling (anytime recently, at least) and he got immediately told by some other people to take down the link to the thread and I removed his post. \n\nI almost wonder if the cancer comes from r/nanocurrency itself. I am only active in r/nanotrade because it used to be a lot more memey than r/nanocurrency. I don't know what goes on in the main sub. \n\nBut yeah, this comment thread here was embarrassing. I get coming in here and being like \"WOO NANO #1 BABY IT'S GONNA MOON\" and you're just like \"Haha yeah, maybe!\" but beyond that, read the fuckin' room. _The guy is doing a little coin game for fun and not trying to shill or anything with 1 specific coin._ And people still pressed it like \"NAH FAM FA$T FEELE$$ GREEN$\" and it's like <PERSON>. \n\nI do believe that Nano is still a great currency, and _some_ parts of the community come up with some pretty funny memes. I don't think it's a coordinated attack from r/nanotrade (or I'd be banning those people) as much as it is just... some overzealous morons that live here, waiting for the opportunity to strike like a snake about how great Nano is, and can't realize to leave well enough alone.", "434" ], [ "[Bought 16k Nano at 5.1k sats like 1.5 months ago](_URL_0_) \n\nIncidentally, it is with the same leftover stack that I had from 2017. I cashed out the bulk of what I made right around the time the market started crashing (after BTC fell all the way to $14k) and left like ~0.75 BTC ($10k) stay in there just for the ride. \n\nI watched the ~0.75 BTC go all the way down to $2.25k in this past March and then I watched it surging back up and never bought into Nano until I saw in November Nano climb up out of nowhere to like 8k sats. \n\nI had some FOMO but kept my cool and decided to set a price target of 5.1k sats (ordered when the price was around 7k sats FWIW) and I watched as it took like 2-3 weeks before filling. \n\nThen continued to watch as the price _continued_ to bleed down to around 3k sats. \n\nAnd I'm feeling good, despite the very likely Nano pullback into slowbleed that has been so prevalent lately, because that trend will only continue _until it doesn't_ and I don't feel like being out of the coin when it randomly decides to go parabolic.", "928" ], [ "Yeah, that's how I found this post. But this is the first r/CC post I've seen in a long time. \n\nAnd [I did remove a thread inside that post that encouraged shilling](_URL_0_) and multiple people discouraged from posting to r/CC at all. \n\nI am okay with people in r/nanotrade linking to r/CC, as long as they don't shill here or obviously coordinate a brigade. I didn't see what I would consider \"brigading\" in this thread. Nano discussions seem to be all contained within this one top-level comment that was actually started by the guy whose post I removed on r/nanotrade, about Nano's performance itself. Ghostserpent started saying something dumb and I commented that it was dumb. Overall it just seems like not-brigade-levels of normal discussion to me. \n\nI see more talk about LTO than Nano, FWIW.\n\nDisclaimer: I do not _normally_ frequent r/CC, but I have often heard talk about how badly Nano brigades it. If this is as bad as it gets, then I think the rumors might have been overstated.", "434" ], [ "> Well, for one, any links are against the rules\n\nYou're telling me that _crossposting_ is against Reddit's rules? Because the post you linked is a crosspost. And if crossposting is against the rules, then I think you might need to take it up with Reddit site admins and inform them that they spent time and development efforts to have a little \"crosspost\" button that, when pressed, breaks their own terms of use. \n\nUh oh, looks like [Ghana brigaded you guys a month ago!](_URL_0_) \n\n > It's anything that breaks voting on a post. \n\nThis post isn't pro-Nano or anti-Nano, just \"Nano was involved.\" I am not sure why voting would be affected by this post? In fact, its upvotes and rewards seem more-or-less justified by the effort and content that I see. I don't see this here at +0 due to a ton of downvotes, nor do I see it at some hyperinflated number. \n\n > Sentiment changes immediately to \"WOW NANO GREAT ++++\" at 50 upvotes and criticism of Nano at -50. \n\nI've _heard_ of this phenomena. jwinterm posts on r/nanotrade and talks about it. I've yet to see it, though. I got to this post as a direct link from r/nanotrade and I am not seeing it here. I see a handful of optimistic pro-Nano posts ranging from +7 to +20 and I see your less-than-optimistic posts hanging out around +10. \n\nTop sub-comment in the thread is about Dogecoin, which is a meme shitcoin. Second highest post says: \n\n > I prefer the growth ETH, VET and LTO bring me. \n\nMentioning 3 non-Nano coins, with you and (conspicuously) everyone in that thread talking about how great this not-even-top-200 LTO coin is. \n\nThen I see another post about LTO, a mod-flaired post about Dogecoin, and yet ANOTHER post about LTO before seeing the post about Nano. \n\nSo either LTO, some no-name sub-200 coin, is way more popular than Nano, or they \"brigaded\" it, or Nano didn't brigade it. \n\nIf this thread is an example of the legendary Nano \"brigading\" that I've heard so much about, then perhaps I was worried over nothing and need to loosen up on the rules about posting to r/CC. \n\nu/jwinterm - is this thread an example of the kind of \"brigade\" that you refer to when you post about it in the r/nanotrade sub?", "263" ], [ "I am actually not sure why I got banned. For making this post, I assume. \n\n<PERSON> informed me that subs can make up whatever rules they want. He seems to believe that gives him the right to make up a rule that says that our sub can't crosspost to his sub, despite the fact that our sub is a separate sub. It's like if I made a rule that said that he had to send his wife to my place every other Friday -- he has no jurisdiction to say what we can/can't do in our sub. \n\nI responded by making this rule, saying that it's OK to do so, and he banned me. Or so it would seem. Hard to say. \n\nNaturally, you may still be banned in their sub regardless of what you do. Most likely for doing absolutely nothing, given you are a pro-Nano user. This is a rule for _our_ sub, to inform people that I will no longer be removing their posts for encouraging shilling in r/CC. \n\nYou see, I was previously going out of my way to remove any posts that linked to r/CC and encouraged shilling, and now I will be going out of my way to remove any posts that discourage others from posting in r/CC. So if his actual goal were to reduce the amount of nano posting in r/CC, he went about it poorly. \n\nIt's clear they've got a vendetta against Nano. Some no-name rank200 coin LTO got about 10x as much shilling as Nano did in that thread, but because a pro-Nano poster reached +19 they considered it brigading. A Dogecoin shitpost even reached +70. \n\nI saw people criticizing Nano with positive numbers, and even I myself argued against some of the Nano shilling when it was unreasonable (again: \"unreasonable\" and upvoted to a shocking +7). \n\nI haven't banned them here, however, because I am not a coward. The lines of communication are always open for if they should ever decide to reach out and admit that they have been unreasonable with regards to considering pro-Nano posts reaching +7 as \"brigading,\" but I am not optimistic.", "621" ], [ "Yes. The real issue is that Snorlax was conflating two issues: \n\n1. Site-wide rules against brigading, wherein many people go and intentionally fuck over a sub/post/comment. \n2. CC-only rules against cross-posting. \n\nClaiming that we're violating the latter is fine. They can set up whatever rules they want. They can ban people for anything or nothing. \n\nClaiming that we're violating the former is just him making shit up. Cross-posting isn't brigading, and it isn't against site-wide rules. \n\nThe only thing I've specified in this post is that I will no longer be taking action against people _within_ nanotrade who post links to r/CC, unless those posts violate the Reddit site-wide rules against brigading. \n\nIn short: I assumed they were acting in good faith and was trying to give a little moderator courtesy. They had no appreciation and were fairly rude, revealing themselves to hate any-and-all mention of Nano, so I won't be going out of my way any longer to make their lives easier.", "621" ], [ "> Voltage isn’t what kills people electricity wise, amperage is. High voltage makes it easier for electricity to kill you, and amperage is basically the scale of lethality.\n\nThis is kinda garbage as logic, since rubber becomes vulnerable to electricity at far less than 100 million volts. The only way to make sense of the entire situation was that Enel was actually wielding high amps with low volts. \n\n > Being on a cloud would theoretically make you safer in the event of a lightning strike \n\nIIRC, <PERSON> was actually on vearth (i.e., ground). \n\n<PERSON> def should've died. The ground beneath his feet was destroyed.", "955" ], [ "Agreed. In terms of narrative, <PERSON> not dying actually ruined the story a bit. It trivialized that bomb blast as well. <PERSON> gave his life in exchange for the lives of millions of Alabasta people, and he gave a monologue as he did so, about how it was his Duty with a capital D as the Falcon with a capital F to protect the people. \n\nAllowing him to survive really cheapened that, cheapened the scene you mentioned, and was just overall very bad. \n\nThere have been worse offenders (<PERSON> not dying, <PERSON> not dying) in terms of just \"feel good story moments,\" but none worse in terms of narrative.", "942" ], [ "This is like saying \"everyone who points out that he beat his wife those 5 days are ignoring the OTHER 360 days of the year that he DIDN'T beat his wife!\" \n\nYou don't praise someone just for \"NOT FUCKING UP,\" what? \n\nFact of the matter is that JUST ONE fake death is one fake death too many. He can legitimately kill off 500 dudes and it won't compensate for faking a death even once. \n\nInb4 \"Are you seriously comparing blah to blah?\"", "76" ], [ "> in my case i alwais forgot <PERSON> is dead because it had no impact knowing he probably just did another of his multiple explosions that arc\n\nTHIS! BIG TIME THIS! The fact that character deaths are SO OFTEN faked causes us to doubt when REAL deaths happen. As a result, REAL deaths don't hit us in the feels like they should because we're accustomed to it being fake.", "768" ], [ "I don't even think so in YYH. YYH initial death is kinda the entire plot of the story from, like, the first episode. If you mean the Sensui saga, then sure yeah I think that's reasonable, but I also think that that was a fine direction to take the show in. It's the _main character_ after all. \n\nDBZ definitely. Although it had a magic plot device from the get-go, it had limitations (e.g., cannot revive someone more than once). They bypassed these limitations by using other dragon balls (e.g., Nameks) that were introduced later.", "254" ], [ "It isn't really about that. I'm fine with them being however they want. <PERSON>'s whole thing is about male lust causing them to be punished, after all. \n\nMy beef is with how they are drawn: as sex objects for young teens. <PERSON> being like 28 years old and suddenly getting quadruple H breasts is ridiculous. <PERSON> was fairly flat-chested when we first met her, too. \n\nLet's keep in mind that this is drawn by someone who comes from a culture where the average cup size is like a small B.", "506" ], [ "It's a \"pride\" issue. Gays need a pride parade because they _aren't_ proud. Straights don't need a pride parade because they don't give a shit. \n\nAnd we all shake hands and move on and nobody cares. \n\nExcept this new-age shit isn't \"gay pride! it's okay to be gay!\" but \"straight shame! it isn't OK to be straight!\" I.e., they've gone from propping themselves up with fake praise to putting others down with fake insults. Therein lies the problem. \n\nEDIT: And to be clear, I am not speaking of gay VS straight. I am speaking metaphorically. Man vs woman. White vs black. etc. It used to be about \"you can be proud in your own skin, too!\" and it is now about \"You should be MORE PROUD in your own skin than others!\" Kinda the fundamental difference between \"Black Lives Matter\" and \"All Lives Matter.\"", "418" ], [ "I would say so, yes. It acknowledges both sides to some degree. \n\nAlso, there's a lot of humanity in it. \"Can't live with 'em!\" is often self-degrading, implying that a man can't understand the mind of a woman, and \"Can't live without 'em!\" indicates that we still need them (as more than just biological partners, but in love as well). \n\nIn context, I've almost always seen it as an exasperated father eyerolling about his wife that he undeniably loves. \n\nVery different from the Twitter/Tumblr-style shit we see that actually advocates for male genocide. \n\nThis post is pretty weak, so I agree with him.", "490" ], [ "Why cancel the order? \n\nYou could've just left the order. I remember once in 2018 I did something like I set a sell order at like 220k sats when Nano was at like 200k. I watched it climb up to 220k sats and was thinking \"Fuck yeah\" and was looking for a re-entry point. Like 2 weeks passed and it was down to like 170k and I was like \"NOW'S TIME TO BUY\" only to find out that my sell order only partially filled (yes, I was literally _at the peak_) and the vast majority of my funds were still sitting in the un-sold Nano. \n\nYou could've done it in reverse!", "928" ], [ "Back in 2018, my goal was to trade my way up to 10k Nano. \n\nI traded out of Nano when it started collapsing, cashed out the majority of the money I made, and then bought back in with the relatively small amount I had left recently. \n\nNow I've broken that goal (2x over) and occasionally wonder to myself whether I should aim for 100k. The neat thing about owning 133k or 137k or whatever is that you have 0.1% of the total Nano in circulation, which is enough for dPoS voting rights IIRC.", "928" ], [ "How low do you think Nano is likely to go from here in the next few days? $1? $1.50? $2.20? Pick a price that's so low that you think it won't realistically go lower, but will definitely some day go up from again. \n\nSet a buy order at that. Do not cancel it for a week. Do not touch it for a week. If it fills, do not sell out of it for a week. No matter what happens. \n\nAssuming it fills, ask yourself \"How high do I realistically think this will go before it might come back down a bit?\" \n\nWe're not talking long-term. We're talking within a week. \n\nSet your likely price targets for the week. Put up your buy/sell orders. And then just don't touch them. By setting the lines early, you are thinking with your brain. By committing to not changing them, you are preventing your emotions from FOMO/FUDing you in/out. \n\nOf course, this is still only as good as your brain. You'll make bad guesses or do bad research and all of that. But even making bad decisions with your brain is better than making decisions with your emotions.", "511" ], [ "Jaydubs. \n\nYeah. Apparently they suffered a stole. Not nano-related. Some shitcoin. The owner didn't properly issue a patch for a vulnerability in the shitcoin's implementation before it got publicly disclosed, so he lost hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of the shitcoin. \n\nNanex tried to make good on it (promised to pay it back out of profits) but they didn't make that much money. Not too much volume, and the fact that everything was priced in relation to Nano was awkward and counterintuitive. The exchange died as a result.", "831" ], [ "That's the part you think makes no sense? \n\n<PERSON> and his band of weaklings wouldn't be able to 5v1 BM right now, let alone <PERSON> + <PERSON> working together. \n\n<PERSON> + <PERSON> will not fall unless something like <PERSON> or <PERSON> himself joins <PERSON> & co -- and maybe not even then -- or if <PERSON> betrays <PERSON>.", "40" ], [ "> ...and anyone who bought shares this morning is down 5-15%.\n\nOutright not true. I bought 1200 shares this morning at fucking $41.50. I immediately sold decently OTM calls ($48) expiring THIS FRIDAY and used the sales to buy more shares, with which I sold more calls. \n\nThe end result drove my cost basis down to around $38.50 and I won't get assigned unless the stock price moves like +20% THIS WEEK in which case I'll get pushed out of the stock as it goes parabolic at a \"sad\" +20% gain. \n\nYeah. I'm out if the stock goes down massively, but your own posts prove the point: BUYING options are fucking retarded right now because of the absurdly high IV, but SELLING options is brilliant right now for the same reason. If this stock goes anything resembling a volatile horizontal oscillator then it will be free fucking call selling tendies for weeks. If it launches up to $50 I'll be able to just swap over to selling cash-covered puts to get back in. If it launches to $100 then I missed the rocket but gained a \"meager\" 20%. \n\nThe only way I lose is if it collapses and I'm stuck bagholding \"shit\" shares, and guess what? With RC now at the helm and all the other DD around this stock PLUS this volatile market in general, I'm sure it'd rebound to $40+ within a few a months in all likelihood. Meanwhile, I'd be selling FD calls week-over-week at huge premiums because of its IV that _you said yourself_ is retardedly high. \n\nEverything is ultimately gambling, but you're the dumbass who would look at 1:3 odds with 8:1 payoffs going \"GAMBLERS!!!!!!\" as you clutch your pearls on your way to mass.", "928" ], [ "Why would you be banned here? Outside of outright FUDing (as opposed to _being a bear_) and spamming I don't ban anyone here, and I am the only one banning anyone here. Unlike CC mods, I also don't ban people just for arguing with me. \n\nI remove a lot of posts without saying anything. More than most people probably notice. Almost any posts that suggest anything political, for example. We're here to make money, not orange man good/bad. \n\nBut pretty much no individual is so bad at repeatedly posting removable content that I've considered removing them. Except for spruce_g00se. Every time that guy tries to conspiratorially suggest that \"BTC maxi whales\" are the reason behind shit it gets so flat earth cringey that I think about making rules against it.", "621" ], [ "That is impressive that that guy managed to keep his feelings out of it enough to hold himself back from banning you. When it came to the mods over there, <PERSON> always seemed like the kind of guy who was a little high on power, but <PERSON> felt like the kind of guy who was a little fragile on ego. \n\nA very unfitting name, given the thin skin.", "1007" ], [ "Since Nano has been such a stablecoin around $3.50 while BTC oscillates, the NANO-BTC chart looks like an inverse of the BTC-USD chart. Compare the two side-by-side some time and you'll see they are inversely correlated. \n\nSo any \"WE'RE ABOUT TO GO UP\" revelations on NANO-BTC is likely to just indicate that BTC is likely to go DOWN, and I doubt we will stay desynced as a $3.50 stablecoin if BTC suddenly dropped outside of its mid-30k banding.", "1008" ], [ "I bought at $41.50 and immediately sold a shit ton of covered calls (OTM FD's which have an ABSURD PREMIUM DUE TO THE IV). I then went ahead and used the premiums to buy more shares (which I then used to sell more calls..). \n\nCome Friday, assuming it doesn't rocket before then to an absurdly high value already ($50+ -- which would still end up a ~25% gain for me), I'll buy back my IV-crushed calls so that they can't be exercised to help the shorts unwind. \n\nOverall, this play brought my cost basis down from $41.50 to around $38.50. My plays from here are as follows: \n\nGME to > $52ish -- I reap 25% profits on a ~3-day position and immediately plan to re-enter by selling naked put FDs with gigantic IV premiums. \n\nGME to $48-$52 -- I buy back my IV-crushed calls at a loss and my cost basis shoots up to around $44ish, which still leaves me greatly ITM. \n\nGME to $45-$48 -- I buy back my IV-crushed calls for pennies on the dollar so they can't be assigned to unwind. Optionally I sell some more deep OTM FD calls for next Friday and repeat the process by buying back after IV crush. \n\nGME to < $45 -- the FDs expire worthless and I just collect the premium, ensuring that I enjoy the lower cost basis (and, thus, additional shares). I immediately leverage them into selling more OTM FD calls for next week and repeat the process. \n\nOption premiums right now are abso-fucking-lutely bananas and it's almost entirely due to IV, which is being crushed. You can pull out ~20% gains by selling OTM FD calls with low risk of being assigned right now. \n\nThe biggest risk here by far is that GME truly moons to $500 or some crazy shit like that, and you miss out on a 10bagger. But if that doesn't happen til, say, April, and you're compounding +20% week-over-week (and like +40% on the week where you get exercised due to the option premiums and the fact that you're being assigned on such a higher number), that means you're getting like nearly 3 fucking months of +20% gains. 1.2^12 * 1.4 = 12.5. \n\nSo basically even if this shit goes 1000% in April, I'd still win out with this strategy. My two biggest losing plays are either if this shit goes 1000% REALLY soon or if it crashes to something absurdly low (like sub-$20) REALLY soon. Any other scenario nets me too much extra cash. \n\nTL;DR: selling deep OTM FD calls lets you RAKE IN THE FUCKING DOUGH right now due to the IV premiums, and the IV crushing means you can prevent any of the short scumbags from unwinding with your shares unless the stock truly moons.", "511" ], [ "It is if you buy more than you short-sold and at a cheaper price due to the dip you created. \n\nImagine stop-loss-hunting. You drop a massive shortsell on a stock in order to trigger a shitton of stop-losses that drive the price down 20%. Then you buy back all of the shorts to cover and then additional to go long. It'll only cost 80% of how much you got from short-selling in order to pay back the shares you borrowed, and all additional shares are just free money when the price rebounds.", "511" ], [ "Set a buy order last night for Nano at $3.45 and woke up to see that I basically was the bottom. Then I immediately set a sell order at $3.69 and saw that the top 2-3 hours later was $3.68. So I licked my wounds as I watched Nano fall back to $3.55 by selling into BTC at 9.9k satoshis. \n\nSo now I'm in BTC and I'm up about 3% from this morning (in terms of USD). BTC has a lot of room for growth (its oscillating range puts its current price at basically a low, compared to recent highs roughly 10% higher) and the NANO-BTC pair has room to fall (ITS oscillating price, even factoring in the higher lows, shows its bottom to be around 9k satoshis). \n\nSo I have a KuCoin bot that's watching the price for me. It'll list a buy order if it sees the NANO-BTC ratio dip below 9.1k satoshis at 9.1k satoshis, or it'll list a sell order (to USDT) if it sees the BTC-USDT ratio surpass 38k. \n\nUsing a bot to basically simulate OCO in this instance. \n\nI do this every day. You can easily see 5-10% gains day-over-day by doing this. The worst is that some days don't hit my targets and no trades end up happening, and those are just boring days (AKA 100% of days for \"hodlers\"). \n\nMy biggest risks here are run-away prices in either direction, but crypto has shown us that volatility (even in EXTREME swings) is predictable. BTC can drop to $20k and I'd still expect to see it to return higher than $40k, and it can launch to $50k and I'd still someday expect to see it sub-$30k. \n\nI'd be sorry if NANO truly mooned like 100x. But even if it mooned 2x-3x, I make more money on trades than I'd make by just holding. And actual trading prepares you for the day when it comes time to take profits (else you end up riding Nano down from $38 to $0.30 cough). \n\nI'd rather take consistent 5-10% wins than wait around for a 10000% win. It doesn't take that many wins to add up to something meaningful. \n\nFor perspective: I entered crypto when the market was near its 2017 ATH. If I sat in my first coin (~8 LTC, bought at its literal ATH), I'd currently have $1,200. Nano was around $8 when I first entered it (~150 of them), which would now be around ~$550. Instead, I maintain a trading stack of $50k USD worth of (BTC/Nano/USDT) at all times, and any excess proceeds just go into a \"cold\" (holding) Nano wallet to mitigate risk. \n\nI've already won out. I could stop trading tomorrow and let the entire $50k trading stack go to $0 in some shitcoin and my cold Nano wallet would still have more in it than my original, paltry $3k investment in December of 2017.", "928" ], [ "IMO, trading with such low funds is a great experience. You should absolutely do it. It's good practice and it's fun. It's low enough money that you can sleep easy at night even if you fuck up (big whoop, you failed to turn $100 into $200... go sell some lemonade on the sidewalk while you cry about it in order to make up the difference). \n\nAnd the best part: with such low values, you are not a victim to volume. If you see an opportunity, you can buy into it / sell into it immediately. \n\nTry moving $100k across a favorable value in ANY Nano pair on ANY exchange and I guaran-fucking-tee that you will understand my point. NANO-BTC pair on KuCoin gets less than $10k volume per _hour_.", "1008" ], [ "> Anyone else look at the price history on coin market cap and regret not buying more when you had the chance?\n\nMy biggest problem is that I'm never looking at the charts when the insane opportunities happen. \n\nI basically stopped looking at Crypto this year since I was paying attention to \"irl\" shit (read: GMing a guild on Classic World of Warcraft). Then I find out that BTC was $3k in March? Nano was $0.30 in July??? \n\nIf I EVER saw Nano at $0.30, I would have bought up 0.1% of the market cap just for the sake of being able to host my own voting rep. Just for fun.", "1008" ], [ "BTC is going up. I'd say that much is an inevitability. It will breach $100k before long. My guess is that it breaks $1mil before 2035. It's here to stay, and the fixed/finite value aspect will perpetually push it up. World uncertainty increases only drive BTC demand more. I.e., the worst bear thesis for stocks is indirectly a long-term bull thesis for crypto. \n\nWith that said, all cryptos will grow with BTC proportionately to BTC's grandeur until/unless the flippening happens, but even after. \n\nHowever, short-term I think that BTC is in for a correction. I don't buy into the S2F model that implies that BTC will be $100k soon (when not retroactively adjusted to fit the prices, it actually indicated that BTC should have been $100k 1-2 years ago....). I think that BTC is much more likely to be growing logarithmically, which means that $100k BTC is far more likely in 2022. \n\nBut keep in mind the high volatility (noise) that BTC has. That isn't to say that it can't break $100k this year, but that I don't think it will greatly surpass/sustain it until 2022+. \n\nAs BTC grows, I believe both that its noise will decrease as well as its dominance over other cryptos. Both of these things spell growth for all other cryptos as a whole. If BTC 3x's by this time next year, then I can't see any reason why other cryptos with lower market caps [that don't die] won't end up going 20x+. I include Nano in this especially, which I think is undervalued. \n\nI must admit that I am in agreement with some of the bearish arguments for Nano, primarily with regards to the world maybe not needing a pure currency as a very high market cap coin. However, just because I am willing to admit that Nano might never crack the top-10 does not mean that I am willing to admit that Nano belongs under bullshit like Dogecoin or shitcoins where 75% of their market cap is held in 20 wallets (e.g., Chainlink). \n\nNano has a place. Top 20 perhaps. \n\nIf I assume that BTC 3x's from here and Crypto as a whole 6x's from here (with BTC's dominance waning in such a scenario), and factor in possible inflation and other irl FUD that would promote crypto as possible upsides, and factor in that I think Nano is a top-20 coin even in the bear (conservative) case, then that means that I realistically believe that Nano would go 5.5x [fixing ranking to #20] * 6x [growth of crypto as a whole] = ~33x = ~$100 from here. \n\nThat is, in my opinion, the baseline. Big events can happen in either direction (some other coin replaces the utility of Nano; Nano is compromised; some other bad crypto catastrophe; some huge crypto good news; hyperinflation; real world Nano adoption driving it way higher; etc), but that is IMO where Nano will end up just from it gaining traction as a meaningful non-meme-coin with a realistic use case and crypto as a whole being more legitimized. \n\nAs for what this means for my short-term strategies: I'm grid trading during these horizontal periods, swapping to BTC when consolidation finishes, and then either leveraging (- > Nano) if BTC begins skyrocketing or getting out (- > USD) if BTC begins tanking, until it becomes time to (take profits // buy dip) and then resume grid trading again when it starts oscillating.", "1008" ], [ "As a follow up: \n\n > So I have a KuCoin bot that's watching the price for me. It'll list a **buy order if it sees the NANO-BTC ratio dip below 9.1k satoshis at 9.1k satoshis**, or it'll list a sell order (to USDT) if it sees the BTC-USDT ratio surpass 38k. \n\nSo, for perspective, this buy order triggered and was near the bottom (which was almost exactly 9k sats -- and at these volumes, if I had put a buy order lower than 9.1k it likely would not have filled). Now we're up to 9.4k. \n\nI'll sell either at 9.6k or at USD $3.6. The idea behind these targets is that if we're in a downtrend they're still decently reachable as lower highs and net decent profits (~7.5%). If we're still trading in a grid then I won't be selling at the top but can definitely get back in lower. And if we end up up-trending, then these are still decent price-points that we will fall back into as \"higher lows.\" \n\nBad if we rocket up or down, but safe in any other situation", "928" ], [ "I threw $50k into it yesterday (1200 shares @ ~$41.50). Then I sold covered calls for around $500/contract ($44c FD) (~$6k), used that to buy another 100 shares, sold another covered call (~$500), then used the leftover to buy YET ANOTHER 100 shares and sell YET ANOTHER covered call (~$500). All around $42 or so. \n\nToday, on market open when price had crashed to like $36, I immediately sold 40 shares (~$1500) and, with my leftover ~$400 from the final covered call, bought back all 14 covered calls for only around $1600. The end result was that my $7k from covered calls were covered with only $1600. \n\nIn the end, I now have 1360 shares (without any outstanding contracts) from the same initial money that bought me 1200 shares. My cost basis, as a result, which was originally $41.50, is now only 1200/1360 of that (~$36.4), which means I'm still technically up today. \n\nI might try some more shenanigans today as well. Who knows. I am literally doing all I can to push this shit as far as possible with as much money as I put into it ROFL", "928" ], [ "It's a reference to an old joke. \n\nIn English, we append -er to things to indicate that it's a thing that performs the action. This sounds complicated, but it's not if you think about it: \n\nWork**er**s perform work. \nDriv**er**s drive. \nBuy**er**s buy. \nSell**er**s sell. \netc. \n\nSimilarly, we have the word \"her.\" You know what \"her\" is. It's when you're referring to a woman as the object of the sentence. \"I talked to **her**.\" \n\nThing is that, when speaking quickly (or with certain English dialects), \"her\" can be pronounced like \"'er\". For example: \n\n > Where's <PERSON>? Is she coming to the party? \n > Eh, forget about 'er. She never shows up on time. \n\nOr \n\n > Hey, <PERSON> is shitting in the salsa bowl. \n > Send 'er the hell back home. \n\nAs you can tell in the last one (`send 'er`) it can sound sometimes like other words (`sender` - someone who `sends`). \n\nSo there's this common joke, like: \n\n > I can tell you're a bacon eater! \n > Bake 'n eat 'er? I hardly know her! \n\nThe above is a double-double entendre. The first double entendre is \"bacon\" and \"bake 'n\" (indicating \"bake and\"). The second is \"eater\" (someone who eats) and \"eat 'er\" (a command to \"eat her\"). \n\nThe joke ends up being applied to everything. \n\n > Should I invite <PERSON> to the party? \n > Nah. She shits in the salsa bowl. Fucker. \n > Fuck 'er? I hardly know her! \n\nThe bot probably just scans for words ending with `-er` followed by `her` and just responds with \"Worder? I 'ardly know 'er!\"", "157" ], [ "> if no one uses any of the multitude of abilities that can save someone from hook\n\nSaid like a true roadhog main. The ~4 abilities that would save someone from a hook would also save people from flashbang. Bang also had less range and a longer cooldown. \n\n<PERSON> never busted a shield like RH does now. <PERSON> never defined an entire 3 tank meta like RH is right now. <PERSON> never forced double reinhardt's as hard as RH does now. <PERSON> never fulfilled two roles as RH does right now. <PERSON> never got luckshots to 1-shot 200-250 HP heroes like RH does right now. RH has a better ult by far (Mccree's is one of the worst two in the game). RH never took as much skill as <PERSON> does to be viable, especially at the top-end. \n\n<PERSON> is the most broken, awful, game-breaking hero in the entire game.", "354" ], [ "> However I agree. I'd like to see this ability as one that permits your team to follow up on the massive displacement rather than just launching a touch of death every few seconds.\n\nYeah. Displacement -- ESPECIALLY on such a short cooldown -- is incredibly powerful in a game like this. Even if you don't secure a kill, you're often trading a 6s offensive CD for a 12s defensive CD. And for those who then say \"But RH is useless without his hook\" -- sure, is that why he's gold damage every game due to ripping that rein shield down for his soldier?", "345" ], [ "God thank you. There's this guy at my gym who rolls like an asshole every time. Every time I go against him. For anything. \n\nPositional sparring from closed guard? His elbows are digging into my thighs before we even begin. \n\nSide control? He's trying to guillotine before even started. \n\nBut then when I pressure out his guillotine or flair out his elbows, he just says \"No\" like he's telling me to stop doing it. Then, after the roll, he makes passive aggressive comments that I'm muscling him down. God. I can't stand it.", "425" ], [ "> To be honest, I would probably counter-argue that most people with 2-3 years of training are still pretty bad at jiu jitsu (in the grand scheme of things).\n\nYou're right in gaming, too. 900 hours in a game is laughably low. I have over 600 on Terraria, which isn't competitive at all. I can't count on one hand the amount of games that I put more than 1k hours into, and I've put over 10k hours into three different games -- with two of them being around 30k.", "822" ], [ "How long have you been going? \n\nI'm 26, almost 27. I'd like to be able to compete at a brown-black belt level sometime in my lower to mid 30's. Like, brown around 32-33, black around 34-35. How many hours per week would you recommend for goals like these? \n\nI'm trying to avoid generic stuff like \"As much as you can\" -- technically, I could probably sleep less and do it 40 hours a week. But I have a career, girlfriend, friends, other hobbies, and other stuff going on. I have clear-cut goals and I want to take it seriously, but I don't want to put in 40 hours a week either... What's the minimum weekly hour commitment if I want to make serious progress like this?", "9" ], [ "I'd certainly be happy to see more disruptors added. \n\nAnd if your implication vis-a-vis Rein's shield is that the devs intended the game to have a 100% rein pickrate in all competitive play... that seems pretty terrible. \n\nAnd not even true. It isn't like Volskaya choke is ideal for a rein shield. Or hollywood first point. \n\nRein needs alternatives for main tanking.", "880" ], [ "Because then you sound like an immature dick. \n\nIt's more like you write it thinking it's funny, but then realize that SENDING IT is too far. TELLING PEOPLE you sent it might get some kicks, but then you seem like a bit of an immature dick as well. But sending it ACCIDENTALLY reaps all the advantages of it being potentially funny WHILE ALSO letting you avoid the blowback of looking like the douchebag who didn't realize he shouldn't have actually sent it. \n\nAKA, /OopsDidntMeanTo in a nutshell.", "730" ], [ "His opinion is unpopular but at least partially true. Lots of people are \"depressed\" because it's trendy, they want attention, or they don't know the difference between \"I'm sad because life sucks\" and \"I have clinical depression and think life has no meaning.\" \n\nA huge part of r/depression is the former, which isn't clinical depression. Just people being sad, almost always due to prisons of their own design. \n\nAnd he's right, the other guy changed the topic to be about his flair because he had no relevant comeback. Even if the guy is a total asshole with his LGBT stance, it isn't relevant to the debate at hand. Ad hominem is some pretty low-level shit. \n\nOverall, I'd give this asshole the win in this debate.", "739" ], [ "> I mean in the situation that the law protects, the murder of a dog would not be for \"no reason.\" When an officer is being attacked or charged by a loose dog on a property they are legally searching they have the right to protect themselves. \n\nThat isn't what we're discussing or the \"situation that the law protects.\" We're discussing \"feeling threatened,\" which is very different from *being* threatened. A human can kill another human, in certain circumstances, in self-defense, if the attacker **is** a big enough threat. It would obviously be an enormous downgrade in accountability if the bar were lowered to \"**feeling** like the attacker were a threat.\" \n\n > If you truly believe that there is any instance where someone is in the right for murdering a human being over an animal, than you are truly misguided. \n\nThis comes across like some real moral absolutist garbage. Are you living back in the 1700s or something? Morals are relative. Many people don't particularly believe in some intrinsic value in human life (especially if that human is notably an asshole/bad person). \n\nI support the idea that nobody should be killing anybody (animal or human) without a sufficient burden of proof. I don't want a dog being gunned down because a jackass cop was having a bad day and \"felt\" threatened. I don't want cops being maimed by shitty dogs. I don't want a police officer murdered because they killed a dog who **was** a threat. But I want laws that reflect this: if a cop kills a dog, they should be held to higher accountability standards than \"their feelings.\" And if a cop ever killed a dog just to be an asshole, I'd certainly **hope** the owner guns them down. The world would be minus one asshole and maybe we could get a law review. \n\nTL;DR: If you think that having bad laws is a good thing, or believe that the human life of terrible people has inherent worth that outweighs a human's love for their dog, you are truly misguided.", "141" ], [ "1. \"Widespread\" -- I'm not commenting on a medical journal saying they don't know what they're talking about. This is r/depression. Half of this are teenagers who are sad and blaming their problems on undiagnosed medical conditions. You'd have every right to expect me to present some credentials if I were debating depression's existence or debating facts presented by a doctor. I'm saying that there are children on r/depression who are just whiny and want attention. Are you claiming this isn't a thing? \n\n2. Even if the guy's argument was \"Depression doesn't exist\" or \"u/--orb doesn't exist\" I'd **still** say he won the debate if his opponent's only response was \"Your flair says it all.\" That's how debates work: it doesn't matter who is right or wrong or what I personally think. I'm judging them based on their own merits. The other guy made some irrelevant comment about his flair instead of staying on topic and arguing why he was wrong.", "338" ], [ "Taken a step further, a lot of people DON'T notice the quiet/humble guy. \n\nI've met countless people over the years that were quiet, humble, respectful, respectable, never talked themselves up.. What'd it get them? They got a promotion after like 5 years. They got married to single mothers who made a mistake with a worse man earlier. They were always second line. \n\nAnd that's the problem. Nobody notices that quiet/humble guy early. It takes a long time to earn respect by simply being consistent. \n\nBeing a blowhard from day 1 may get 90% of people's disrespect, but if even 1% instantly respects you, it's gonna pay off. You'll get that promotion, that woman, that whatever without having to wait. \n\nAnd if this is reminiscent of risk takers always getting the one-up over risk avoiders: that's because it is. There's a certain risk to being a blowhard. There's no risk in passively and quietly doing a good job. The risk-rewards are there, whether we like them or not.", "641" ], [ "> Six times bankrupted. \n\nThis sounds like the kind of thing somebody would say if they never took any risks. Would it make sense for somebody who has never done any BJJ in their life to come up to you and say \"You suck! You've been tapped about 300 times!\"? Just like getting tapped is part of learning, so is going bankrupt. \n\nIf he had invested the $200M in a fund, he would have had no chance at making more. He traded roughly $8B in exchange for a **chance** at more, fame, and now political power. \n\nLike him or hate him, quoting someone's failures isn't a good way to discredit them. \n\nEg, your entire case is that he doesn't have any business smarts. But between a dozen successful businesses and half-a-dozen bankrupted ones, I'd actually take that to be a huge amount of experience in business. Failing is part of life.", "747" ], [ "I typically see women beauty standards to involve just not being a fat fuck and putting on some makeup. \n\nMen beauty standards involve putting in a few hundred/thousand hours into a gym, with a lot of bulk/cut cycles and dieting to get sizeable muscles while also maintaining < 10 BF%. \n\nDoesn't seem like a lot more wiggle room. Dad bod phenomenon is like how there are chubby chasers and everything else.", "378" ], [ "Even the original argument is one-sided. There are plenty of things that, if done by a white person, it's lame or trashy. When done by certain minorities, it awesome (adjective dependent on the culture). \n\nEg, if a white person really loves japanese shit, otaku faggot. If a japanese person is really into japanese shit, that's exotic. \n\nIf a white person really likes certain black cultural shit, it's wigger/poser/trashy/etc. If a black person likes the same shit, it's \"gangsta.\" \n\nAt the end of the day, there exist certain stereotypes. White people are better/more refined or whatever, but also lamer (can't dance, speak slowly and stilted, etc). Black people are dirty/trashy/whatever, but more flow (more sexual, speak faster, dance well, etc). Asians are smart/whatever but are bad drivers/whatever. Etc. These stereotypes then get applied when one culture tries to mimic another culture -- a white guy dancing to a black song can't dance and a black guy dressing like a white man is a kiss-ass. It goes in both directions.", "255" ], [ "Yeah. Once, a black guy was walking across the street in front of my mom's car. I was freaking out yelling repeatedly \"HEY MOM! IT'S <PERSON>! MOOOOOM! <PERSON>!\" \n\nThe guy gave us a bit of a look. My mom was extremely embarrassed and said, \"Stop it, --orb. You are almost 27 years old now!\" Then the black guy pulled out his dick, revealing his <PERSON> tattoo, and started helicoptering it around while screaming \"Make America White Again.\"", "980" ] ]
429
[ 3886, 13395, 5084, 16660, 3933, 11829, 21555, 19283, 16263, 3630, 11151, 11969, 11211, 8845, 1797, 21678, 6428, 11685, 17499, 16491, 21743, 20100, 5324, 18017, 13898, 17197, 13250, 16894, 23868, 20154, 14634, 24505, 22345, 12791, 7893, 9876, 1483, 15508, 25121, 11724, 1813, 19829, 19682, 9990, 4671, 21630, 13753, 10441, 25214, 23532, 6086, 20030, 2870, 14369, 14402, 6210, 19957, 17323, 10824, 17232, 10454, 2667, 6658, 10035, 8808, 3540, 7882, 693, 20716, 6172, 5896, 14889, 25218, 9940, 1690, 14107, 16045, 6454, 22294, 24164, 2411, 4841, 17947, 11319, 8584, 16602, 24616, 14990, 13563, 20057, 12008, 19712, 7513, 22044, 4713, 8643, 19314, 5479, 22311, 20282, 120, 14550, 8076, 3098, 7148, 22336, 4222, 23068, 18845, 8827, 17463, 21010, 4469, 8031, 6051, 11057, 10424, 8633, 2103, 20739, 11025, 19221, 2472, 2824, 21464, 8164, 12050, 5266, 7555, 21800, 11184, 6740, 23218, 20777, 19684, 18360, 4664, 3915, 25143, 11802, 15991, 9109, 10438, 14803, 14769, 20123, 13992, 21676, 13601, 4046, 4920, 20116, 4888, 2980, 17524, 1441, 4561, 1543, 21315, 14501, 4864, 16311, 15058, 4498, 14699, 3606, 1318, 559, 21475, 11396, 6350, 16718, 19319, 13470, 22341, 17392, 5393, 16826, 13586, 8443, 9057, 24886, 14316, 10018, 15443, 19350, 1566, 12384, 24030, 990, 2631, 24021, 22272, 15647, 10097, 6193, 10769, 19226, 21384, 18026, 10649, 2445, 12314, 10835, 19377, 18671, 7394, 12835, 592, 19729, 795, 7658, 4317, 7784, 7207, 17254, 25210, 1747, 11116, 9564, 3258, 5611, 2098, 18211, 3750, 15809, 7972, 5026, 20937, 9146, 5241, 12613, 25526, 10795, 9807, 3413, 9460, 18133, 434, 1162, 7873, 6916, 16712, 11117, 3987, 5498, 8084, 5458, 11366, 13049, 19157, 16450, 13360, 8334, 24293, 21714, 20130, 13122, 5400, 11029, 960, 8488, 24397, 4449, 18814, 8524, 13232, 585, 24920, 1267, 8760, 2838, 12139, 1190, 6236, 22296, 14165, 9594, 852, 5253, 13002, 18139, 23877, 14263, 7339, 9984, 19069, 18704, 13626, 15176, 1537, 18770, 579, 21521, 22871, 9208, 1340, 11556, 10578, 5047, 10295, 19179, 3549, 215, 2489, 12357, 205, 2763, 18064, 12362, 18857, 4459, 24029, 18332, 14319, 13845, 10879, 19815, 10925, 11178, 9553, 6071, 15753, 12098, 21766, 662, 17157, 9732, 13172, 17666, 18189, 9202, 22469, 13706, 10823, 22200, 23924, 3417, 23118, 23522, 13514, 12237, 12889, 6944, 14122, 14223, 1552, 13160, 3765, 5182, 8691, 3564, 6431, 10516, 16335, 1225, 2115, 23699, 23706, 6984, 4421, 20681, 18158, 18240, 19124, 10287, 5726, 15205, 15943, 13780, 12482, 3262, 17348, 8133, 24407, 21223, 17133, 23321, 18861, 361, 13752, 6001, 10103, 125, 2895, 2354, 8881, 5095, 4331, 16838, 3173, 8857, 17269, 4779, 4359, 18143, 11753, 6566, 20833, 10626, 7254, 17096, 18306, 12976, 25169, 23020, 9306, 6766, 19318, 23085, 8501, 19142, 16152, 24276, 24582, 17973, 18051, 3316, 15841, 1207, 10888, 16034, 7596, 8032, 12579, 23557, 15064, 17493, 20021, 14558, 22939, 13247, 15854, 7603, 12920, 10612, 22040, 16326, 12034, 14663, 17832, 3945, 7961, 21396, 14759, 14734, 15759, 22705, 22480, 473, 22034, 15794, 21091, 1199, 22503, 9182, 3300, 9061, 21769, 14793, 6818, 1325, 18823, 568, 11630, 18990, 24907, 15449, 1495, 14377, 12510, 6960, 14235, 8305, 9586, 15212, 17975, 20331, 11343, 24096, 18370, 11529, 19834, 19101, 779, 20993, 3739, 1563, 2951, 22250, 187, 811, 9740, 9528, 14214, 20254, 24405, 21654, 20197 ]
reddit_dump_-0-O-
[ [ "Yeah, sorry, we don't believe you. \n\n > I think the fact that I just asked 12 random people in the library\n\nat 12AM EST? 9PM PST?\n\nAt school earlier in the day?\n\nI'm guessing if you're not full of shit, it's the last option, and that you're in junior high. - Because by high school, a good chunk of students are going to be <PERSON>.\n\n12 people in the library don't know who one of the top 5 candidates are? Find a better library.", "948" ], [ "Admitting something was a mistake is good and all, but it doesn't excuse the mistake.\n\n<PERSON> didn't make the first two debates, but since he looked like he might make the third, they pick him over <PERSON>?\n\nThe author is right, it's isn't a \"widespread conspiracy\", it's a widespread lack of professional journalism.\n\n\"We didn't cover him because... he's different. Oh look a senator who might make one debate!- oh, no, he didn't quite make it.\"", "624" ], [ "The half of the \"LegPo\" elected by the people is not pre-approved list. But the half voted by \"Functional Constituency\" ends up being pro-Beijing. \n\nWhat's got me is that the graphic does not say abolish Functional Constituency and implement universal suffrage. It says to abolish the legislative council. \n\nAgain, I don't see where it says, \"so we can replace it with a new legislative council\", I don't see \"hold a new election for legislative council\", I see \"abolish it\"\n\nIf I'm wrong, that's great, but nothing shown to me so far indicates that.", "207" ], [ "I know what suffrage is, thanks.\n\n > It's like in the UK, we didn't get rid of Parliament when giving everyone the vote\n\nOkay but this graphic says \"abolish parliament\" (legislative council is their parliament).\n\nIf Britain was asking to \"abolish parliament\" and institute global suffrage, wouldn't you want to make sure they weren't asking for direct democracy instead of just saying, \"I'm sure they don't mean that.\"\n\nAt best, the graphic is worded poorly and does not reflect what is being asked for. At worst, they really are asking for direct democracy and perhaps don't understand/believe the downfalls of that.\n\n > have to vote on 15 things every day without having the time to read up on the options and what the new laws would specifically entail\n\nOkay, U.S. congress doesn't even vote on 15 things a day, so this is kind of an extreme argument against it, especially if the people asking for it don't currently have democracy at all.", "236" ], [ "Except the legislative council is the entire parliament, not just the house of lords. Half of the legislative council is elected by the people, but they are not asking for only the \"Functional Constituency\" half to be abolished, they are asking for the whole thing to be abolished.\n\nSo, I don't think if someone said, \"Abolish Parliament\", that you'd be so quick to say that most people would recognize that it is implied that they want to replace it with a different parliament.\n\nAbolish is different than replace, and \"universal suffrage\" is what is listed alongside \"abolish\", as if this is the replacement.", "236" ], [ "... if someone said \"dissolve congress\" there would only be one way to take that as well.\n\n > And \"full universal suffrage\" doesn't mean direct democracy at all. If directly for laws, or for representatives, isn't stated.\n\nSo it \"doesn't mean it at all\", but also it might mean that because it isn't stated either way.\n\n > If they really wanted direct democracy, they would state that very clearly.\n\nWell they say to dissolve the representative council, so to me, they are very clearly saying that.", "593" ], [ "Fair enough, and no offense taken, but I was not adamantly claiming that I knew better. I was just not accepting, \"It's obvious what they meant to say\" as an answer- which is all anyone was willing to give until now.\n\nSomeone much closer to the situation agreed that the translation of the last demand is poor, and that the demands of the protesters are very nuanced and not able to be adequately explained in a brief manner.", "809" ], [ "Projecting that I don't go hiking outdoors very often. \n\nNotice in your fine example that the walls are not tall, and the base is not narrow. The one taller wall also shows that the bottom of the wall is washed out compared to the top. The other side is a long slope, with a wide bed.\n\nThe walls in OP image are not washed out and are too close together.", "62" ], [ "_URL_0_\n\nHere is <PERSON> saying \"Nope\" to UBI.\n\n\"I've got a better idea\"\n\nHe goes on to talk about a federal jobs program. \n\n\"There is an enormous amount of work to be done, and what we believe in is guaranteeing a job to anyone who wants to work. That's the better idea.\"\n\nSo please tell me more about how <PERSON> supports UBI.\n\nEdit: Fuck, the THREAD YOU'RE IN IS OF A VIDEO OF <PERSON> SAYING NO TO UBI", "397" ], [ "> The angry dad said: \"I had put a garage up for sale and <PERSON> answered the advert. But when he turned up he didn't seem to have much interest in the garage, only in <PERSON>. He lured her to his flat with sweets, brought her clothes and plastic flowers and even offered to marry her.\"\n\n > **The dad said when their daughter had told them he had kissed her, they banned her from seeing him and filed a complaint with the cops.**\n\nSounds like the parents allowed her to go to <PERSON>'s flat, and it wasn't until she said he kissed her (on the neck and cheek), that they stopped allowing her to see him? Wtf.", "1012" ], [ "> The angry dad said: \"I had put a garage up for sale and <PERSON> answered the advert. But when he turned up he didn't seem to have much interest in the garage, only in <PERSON>. He lured her to his flat with sweets, brought her clothes and plastic flowers and even offered to marry her.\"\n\n > **The dad said when their daughter had told them he had kissed her, they banned her from seeing him and filed a complaint with the cops.**\n\nWtf? So they allowed her to go to his flat before this?", "1012" ], [ "There haven't been plenty of mass-arrests at civil rights protests since the 60's.\n\nAlso protesting is great, but it shouldn't be a requirement that someone has been out \"protesting throughout their entire life\", to become president.\n\nPeople have jobs, families, etc. Not everyone can afford to be at every protest. \n\n<PERSON>'s UBI plan would change that though. Federal jobs program just keeps people too tied up to protest.", "281" ], [ "> He also has the unique ability to pull some former <PERSON> voters over. \n\n<PERSON>? \n\nFormer <PERSON> voters are as open to <PERSON> as they are any candidate. <PERSON> attracts so many former <PERSON> people that he gets called libertarian.\n\n > I personally don’t think it’s worth whatever potential division it would cause to argue adamantly for <PERSON> over <PERSON>. \n\nAgreed. I try not to paint <PERSON> in a negative way. My main goal is to promote UBI, which <PERSON> recently flip-flopped on. He was for it for decades, but now says he's against it.\n\n > With that said, I don’t know what kind of censorship is taking place in the <PERSON> sub, if any at all. If it’s as bad as you say, then that’s never good...\n\nUnsolicited positive comments about <PERSON> get removed. For-<PERSON> comments in reply to against-<PERSON> comments remain, unless they get too many upvotes, or too many comments agreeing with the <PERSON> view.\n\nSomeone said they didn't understand the freedom dividend. I offered to PM them in lieu of posting a long comment about <PERSON>. Two more people replied asking that I send it to them as well, and my comment had 20 points. The question about freedom dividend stayed up, but my offer to send info got taken down.", "211" ], [ "To me it's not about promises. <PERSON> doesn't promise UBI, nor would I expect him to.\n\nThe question is about support. We'll never get UBI if every candidate cowards away from it, out of fear of sounding too fringe. <PERSON> literally was for UBI for many years of his life, but now as a candidate, is against it.\n\nThat's not leadership.\n\nLeadership is supporting the right thing, even if you know you can't get it yet. If <PERSON> said, \"UBI isn't something that we can feasibly get passed in the next 4 years, but I support it, and as president I'll support any effort to advance discussions regarding UBI\", then I'd be praising him for doing so.", "826" ], [ "Brave browser blocks third party ad service/tracking js files by default, while leaving the ones needed for the site to function.\n\nJS is way too useful for anyone to *really* want to get rid of it, if they knew what that meant. Fewer page reloads, fewer \"form resubmission\" alerts, fewer instances of losing data (due to confirmations coming up before clicking away and losing important unsaved data).", "358" ], [ "> If the \"Al lah\" they are worshipping is genuinely the God of the Bible, then they should worship Him as the Bible instructs.\n\nThe Quran is the viewed as a new testament. It is their bible. \n\nPlease show me where your bible says to decorate trees (it prohibits it). Show me where your Bible says to decorate eggs. Show me where your Bible says <PERSON>'s birthday is near the winter solstice.\n\nLooks like you're actually a fucking pagan! Piece of shit why don't you follow the bible? (this is what you sound like)", "447" ], [ "> Then why not just stake the 7k yourself and use the rewards to pay to onboard? This is something you can do on your own, is it not?\n\nIf I want to wait a year to onboard, or cover the cost of the reward up front, yes (I'd need to have 8400 LOOM up front, if I don't want to wait a year).\n\n > \n > Fair enough, can you let us know where you found this wording: \" you need to stake LOOM as payment to the validators \" - we'll update it\n > \n\nIt's on the plasma dashboard under Deploy. It's listed just below the $99 and three blank tiers.\n \n > Although we genuinely appreciate the interest from hobbyists, blockchains do have a financial cost in order to achieve their decentralized nature. Someone has to pay the validators to keep the blockchain running.\n\nThis makes sense, but the deployment cost doesn't go instantly and directly to validators, does it? It's my understanding that the 1400 LOOM goes into a pool to pay out rewards. I don't see how a 1 year lockup of 7k tokens with reward diverted to the pool would hinder this process in any way.\n > \n > So if someone can't afford the approximate $35 per year (at current LOOM-USD prices) to deploy to the real thing...maybe it's not the right blockchain for them.\n\nAs a crypto-enthusiast I want to be forward with you when I say that this kind of language is off-putting. I know that you're specifically talking about deployment and not general use, but \"not the right blockchain for you\" sends the wrong message. \n\nEspecially in an emerging blockchain like LOOM, where people might not fully grasp the benefits and would have uncertainty about costs, you should always be mindful to put on your salesman tongue and talk up LOOM rather than pointing people away. I understand it may be insulting to hear people don't want to pay $35, when that's basically nothing, but I assure you I did not mean to be insulting. I support LOOM and I feel that offering a stake-to-pay option would increase LOOM volume (people need to buy 7k LOOM instead of 1.4K), increase onboarding, and bring in the same revenue as up-front payment. \n\nI suggested it as a win-win for LOOM and for newcomers.", "835" ], [ "Top result:\n\n > Of course, it needs to be acknowledged that convincing the skeptic of the divine origins of Scripture is no easy task. Since “the natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God”\n\nSecond result:\n\n > The Bible claims to be the word of God\n\n > This fact does not settle the issue, of course.\n\n > The Koran claims to be the word of Allah; the Book of Mormon claims to be the revelation of God. But at least we know that Christians do not believe something about the Bible which it does not claim for itself.\n\nThird result:\n\n > The Bible itself says in 2 Timothy 3:16, “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness.”(NIV) Did you catch that word “God-breathed”? That’s the biblical term to describe what is meant by the inspiration of God’s Word. But how did God “breathe”, that is, just how did he give the writers of the Bible his message?\n\n > Some Christians believe that God dictated the Bible word for word in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, and that the writers were simply secretaries who recorded those words. \n\nFourth result:\n\n > Many people question who the author of the Bible is and wonder if the Bible is really the Word of God. I want to give you five reasons to affirm the Bible is the Word of God.\n\n > The Word of God: Evidence that Scripture is Divine.\nFirst, I believe the Bible is the Word of God because of its scientific accuracy. \n\nShould I keep going or? Nice try calling me a dipstick, an idiot, and \"son\". Try googling something to see the results before you suggest someone else does it. Fucking idiot you are.", "487" ], [ "Right.. I know they were written after he died. But most Christians do not, and the bible does not portray itself as this, which is exactly what the argument is about.\n\nThe bible (NT) claims to be a first hand account of the story of <PERSON>, with direct quotes from <PERSON>, etc. It says it is the divine word. <PERSON> = God, therefore the bible claims to be the direct word of god. You're helping prove my point. <PERSON> = God. NT = words of <PERSON>. NT = words of god. \n\nAnd the Old Testament claims God wrote 10 commandments *himself* on tablets and gave them to <PERSON>. So it directly claims to be the word of God.\n\nChristians believe this shit. Muslims believe their shit. It's the same shit. Don't try to act like Muslims believe some crazy fairy tale and Christians don't. It's all fairy tales and they all believe stupid shit equally.", "487" ], [ "Literally the top 4 results of what you suggested I google are people arguing that the bible is the actual factual word of god, and yet you're arguing that Christians are actually more secular and don't believe the bible is the word of god? \n\nYou must not know any Christians. \n\nAnd what's with the screaming? <PERSON> dude get a fucking grip. You're wrong. Christians are batshit crazy and believe the bible is the direct word of God and have no fucking clue that it was written way after he died. Try telling Christians it was written a hundred years later and they think it's misinformation and get defensive. \n\nI could make all of the same arguments your making.\n\nThe Quran was written by muslims for man! Every Muslim with a braincell knows this! The billions of secular muslims outnumber the few zealots! But Christians want to change the world! They go to war to invade the West Bank and commit Jihad for their holy land!", "960" ], [ "Calling bullshit was your argument from the start, and you backed it up with nothing but *verifiable bullshit*, as you say to google about Christians believing the bible is the divine word of god... and it turns out, THEY DO! Almost all of the top results are christians arguing that the bible really is the divine word of god, or atheists arguing that it is not.\n\nGreat job that your only source is evidence against your own argument. \n\nThat isn't \"just calling something bullshit\", that's spelling out exactly why it is bullshit.", "960" ], [ "No, I don't think that. I know that they aren't, but many Christians believe that they are. No need to cry out deep down in a pathetic chain of comments nobody will read. Simply do the google search you recommended to me and realize almost every result from a Christian source is arguing that the words are direct from god. \n\nCase closed, not wasting anymore time on your disability.", "960" ], [ "> How that correlates to BAT price is up for discussion. If that kind of spending 10X's the market cap, then you get a $66 BAT. \n\nPlease re-read what you wrote.\n\n\"If that kind of spending ($10b per year) 10x's the market cap\"\n\n10x's it from 40x where we are now? so 400x?\n\nYou mention 10x, and 10b being spent per year, but just magically jump from that to 10b being the starting market cap. Why would the market cap magically be the same as the annual bat sales, and also why would it 10x from those same sales.\n\nYour sentence should read, \"If that kind of spending 400x's the market cap\" which you might find sounds a little less exceptional.", "606" ], [ "~~Well the chain size exceeded 1TB in 2018 and I see his post is from 2019 so not sure how he plans on having that work out.~~\n\nEdit: Sorry that's for archive nodes.\n\nA laptop is not ideal for running a full node, as he mentions battery dying, losing connection, etc. \n\nHe tries stopping his full node multiple times to run with different settings.\n\nSorry but this guy failing to run a full node doesn't prove anything other than he made a bunch of mistakes.", "543" ], [ "Of course it's better than a closet, but it most certainly allows anyone to open it within 30 seconds. Anyone can google search \"how to open < insert brand > safe\" and get this video within seconds.\n\nThat qualifies \"anyone\"- as far as tools? A coat hanger would probably be enough to hit that button. This guy used a flat shim because he's a pro and has one available. That doesn't mean you need a special tool to open this safe.", "473" ] ]
443
[ 5947, 22740, 7659, 8687, 16256, 23928, 8993, 7034, 4740, 22830, 9237, 5566, 15477, 10768, 22567, 4231, 4027, 20106, 10402, 9110, 22014, 2230, 3815, 16277, 14896, 2420, 19342, 3850, 16798, 12601, 1499, 18447, 22242, 18182, 12744, 16019, 16584, 13822, 17559, 2895, 797, 18477, 14446, 16258, 6259, 18499, 20109, 22648, 19175, 20145, 25052, 11409, 23188, 24424, 24729, 16152, 24022, 12999, 112, 8122, 23398, 10390, 7609, 19332, 11834, 18379, 13299, 21680, 5572, 25018, 11130, 5968, 25471, 22034, 8017, 24187, 7687, 24755, 3217, 11978, 22392, 17235, 18436, 12585, 21433, 15085, 17236, 2107, 2916, 13630, 12448, 22102, 12359, 24445, 22243, 16293, 13084, 2650, 1037, 4872, 12382, 11431, 10873, 17126, 13752, 21643, 1192, 7985, 9104, 17234, 2783, 15568, 1207, 23042, 9913, 20553, 15535, 13930, 19162, 19592, 19720, 15823, 3091, 1331, 10224, 6712, 25130, 15165, 9841, 19425, 10797, 5045, 21843, 6459, 7764, 9431, 17193, 13077, 19410, 25195, 23388, 11317, 17349, 19220, 20279, 25404, 13834, 13536, 3757, 4910, 14791, 21932, 21099, 15413, 5661, 19966, 23715, 24085, 5185, 14649, 18600, 5040, 24263, 17997, 4707, 23339, 23053, 5142, 24208, 18012, 13851, 4039, 17840, 16540, 4526, 2275, 23291, 12872, 10640, 19514, 11412, 10237, 19339, 9920, 2403, 16165, 5941, 25508, 13014, 2118, 16744, 16949, 24948, 11571, 923, 10815, 18349, 14341, 18673, 4892, 13092, 24074, 16569, 5370, 8748, 16898, 12937, 12308, 4474, 432, 11983, 10226, 5551, 7909, 4366, 21811, 7400, 5769, 2675, 15909, 21220, 2444, 8386, 8806, 20451, 23337, 5191, 14707, 3247, 20811, 2314, 22006, 14720, 7002, 9059, 838, 15113, 2545, 24028, 3186, 23533, 20007, 14255, 21582, 11676, 1464, 679, 1535, 9672, 7543, 8764, 9717, 11831, 15500, 3316, 23358, 1112, 2970, 12420, 25084, 25066, 8146, 24338, 10744, 10671, 25463, 7036, 14748, 8885, 22886, 18302, 11522, 9476, 1937, 6514, 9439, 5708, 13882, 4441, 9752, 10192, 4280, 5411, 7055, 633, 7123, 9092, 15009, 11565, 11141, 10236, 12920, 7677, 5729, 887, 13864, 19668, 19374, 8863, 14118, 2080, 8045, 13114, 1573, 14948, 17265, 15563, 8204, 14658, 19256, 3633, 16208, 17237, 12306, 19131, 6670, 7155, 8508, 4397, 6510, 10328, 14067, 22798, 11984, 23093, 1857, 22725, 5076, 4853, 23974, 22688, 21419, 19658, 21120, 12361, 11133, 1169, 12409, 504, 18346, 4278, 8865, 15211, 18807, 6427, 17739, 18756, 143, 13537, 8108, 18644, 8909, 14938, 16035, 9486, 17903, 5727, 21890, 13464, 11059, 5418, 15922, 1593, 10465, 23748, 2489, 24129, 2577, 5966, 499, 4129, 5146, 15420, 222, 6105, 24083, 20364, 10850, 16836, 15658, 1374, 5397, 3223, 10022, 4248, 19377, 4779, 11692, 22235, 1580, 20316, 12402, 10134, 3753, 10014, 9663, 15889, 922, 7568, 14313, 6975, 4834, 20286, 5962, 13701, 11496, 19178, 1259, 21992, 18819, 18393, 14701, 6590, 1377, 15962, 10027, 23187, 14282, 2559, 8273, 21112, 4529, 8974, 19789, 2663, 15259, 6697, 10108, 13520, 19760, 5988, 5068, 14944, 14038, 12913, 5695, 15034, 2794, 21627, 10483, 18272, 12136, 11012, 1884, 9248, 10759, 6499, 9188, 2394, 22690, 9803, 8734, 9643, 15757, 20644, 20038, 25051, 5371, 2144, 23233, 9261, 3721, 17950, 4796, 14799, 1245, 14949, 10416, 23117, 20858, 23586, 5969, 823, 14226, 11508, 21741, 6846, 22935, 10593, 8389, 23685, 15086, 21884, 5463, 24807, 24533, 23029, 6390, 8873, 12579, 999, 20191, 12594, 23571, 10922, 15628, 23490, 2917, 24507 ]
reddit_dump_-10-B
[ [ "I love your backpack Idea, it really makes more sense than just emptying your backpack for no reason and having it empty in your inventory/supply locker, It would make finding extra backpacks more worth keeping. With this I'll love if the also revamped vehicle inventory by adding some kind of heavy meter where you can add stuff depending on how heavy they are, for example you can fit a lot of items like seeds, parts, and fuel but adding things like generators and rucksacks would take up the most space making you carry less stuff.\n\nYour outpost idea would be a pain the ass and confusing, I'll rather not have to drive back and forward repeatedly trying to stock up my outposts to do me any good. Would take up way too much of my time, So I hard disagree on this.", "949" ], [ "I've only done that when I was new once or twice, The devs did limit this a bit for it to not be OP. Back then you earned all your influence back after refunding your outposts then they changed it to where you only earn half your influence back. I feel like this is one of those ideas where someone suggested to remove the feature that lets you stand on top of cars, Outposts and bases having the same supply locker items is a big feature.\n\n You can make your own challenges where you aren't allowed to use outposts tho if you find it to easy or just not allowed to cheese the system by clamining an outpost when your in trouble. But theres other ways to go about this where it wouldn't be much of a pain which would be to choose which items to move and keep when claiming an outposts.", "221" ], [ "Oh I never knew when farcry 1 took place so basically <PERSON> wasn't mentioning <PERSON> in farcry 4 since that took place in 2014? Unless they met before the events of farcry 1.\n\nSo the timeline is basically Farcry primal, Farcry 2, Farcry 3, Farcry 4, Farcry 5, Farcry 1, Then Farcry new dawn. While Farcry blood dragon takes place in an alternative universe where the blood dragon movie in Farcry 5 was real and there being a glitch in the matrix where we find blood dragon eggs in farcry primal. This timeline is quite weird.\n\nI found this while googling which could make sense with the storyline. \"But before the reprisal of Hope County to the Far Cry series is the very first title that began the saga, the first Far Cry. Unbeknownst to many at the time of its release, Far Cry is set in the year 2025, taking place after the events of The Collapse, which left the world in ruins\"", "750" ], [ "> likes to fight with <PERSON>\n\nOnly <PERSON> fights with <PERSON>, The network don't really say anything even <PERSON> tells <PERSON> to stop arguing with them.\n\n > , <PERSON> seems to be infected by an unknown virus, and her life is in danger, but <PERSON> helps and successfully saves <PERSON>.\n\n<PERSON> was diagnosed with lupus which is a disease not a virus which means \"any of various diseases or conditions marked by inflammation of the skin.\" which is caused by a combination of genetics. I did my research. Also where did you get the information that red talon saves lily? I remember hearing that twain say that some network friends found medicine that lily needed and saved her. The network also questioned why the red talon never helped since they have the medicine lily needed.", "373" ], [ "Great theories! Loved how you called <PERSON> \"Big foot\" Lol\n\nRed talon somewhat cares for its soldiers Like I remember hearing it from <PERSON> but they are very willing to sacrifise soldiers for a mission, Missions are priority to them. but sometimes they risk saving a soldier.\n\n > Red Talon seems to have a lot of ties with the government.\n\nDo they really? I remember hearing <PERSON> say that he and other red talon members served with the military but they are just as clueless as us to why the government and military abandoned everything and disappeared, they do believe its for a good cause. But who knows, most military groups were left behind as well like the ones in Sod1, heartland, and lifeline...\n\n > Some reports say that red talon will attack unarmed homeless survivors.\n\nMy guess for this is that they mistaked them for a threat such as a survivor approaching them to kill them or a zombie wandering clueless towards them. \n\nIm interested to hear your military and government theory next.", "920" ], [ "Oh I never knew that, Thought <PERSON> was the boss and <PERSON> like the \"Second\" in charge. Never payed much attention IG.\n\nYep, I also think that the government has a strong connection to <PERSON>, It just makes the most sense, Im wondering how Undead labs will continue this story, Maybe the government makes a appearence in Sod3? Really hope the add story to the game instead of just background Dialogue most people ignore.\n\nYou've made every other big theory except the army one so far. Im also curious what the next theories will be after this, will you do Sod1 missing characters, freaks, lily and maybe even sasquatch? The other characters have very little info about them so doubt you talk about them.\n\nLike a few weeks ago there was someone posting their own stories about freaks origins and it was very interesting, I love hearing theories about this game. Its weird how memes and just close death clips are the most popular in this sub but not posts lile these. Love seeing new stuff on this sub so keep it up👍", "719" ], [ "They were alright, but bad compared to past dlcs like valley of the yetis and farcry blood dragon. \n\nI did find lost on mars and hours of darkness quite fun but short. Dead living zombies was my least favorite since its just 7 levels instead of an open world dlc. If you don't have farcry 3 you can get the farcry 5 season pass containing the dlcs plus farcry 3 as a bonus.", "148" ], [ "Standard and dread are super easy compared to lethal, If you can't handle nightmare mode then theres no way you can handle lethal. I recently just finished all boons for lethal and I had many close death encounters, but I was very careful to be stealthy which matters a lot in this difficulty. Running around making noise will get you killed eventually.", "345" ], [ "> In oders you are surviving on some dangerous playce you dont know. In FC5, they are trying to survive with you.\n\nThe deputy doesn't recognise the area either, just like any other far cry game. Thats why the whole map is foggy until you explore the area.\n\n > you are just too OP.\n\nYou are OP in the other farcry games as well? You can basically heal yourself for an infinite amount of times and have some unique skills in older far cry games.\n\nI also love games to be challenging but still found Farcry 5 to be my favorite.", "250" ] ]
78
[ 10723, 389, 3873, 9664, 18918, 18647, 22163, 4954, 3621, 830, 6060, 4637, 7647, 12717, 7334, 16852, 20711, 5789, 9981, 19180, 5425, 7067, 14792, 5212, 3315, 520, 14496, 4043, 21399, 5086, 11427, 25056, 2246, 6131, 9617, 11820, 212, 14587, 14131, 14339, 9529, 1981, 19116, 899, 1701, 630, 1968, 7518, 24168, 6669, 22373, 7285, 2925, 17478, 18263, 10751, 23160, 8111, 1810, 1427, 6092, 20126, 18795, 5523, 20, 7005, 21039, 3303, 8226, 21079, 16396, 1518, 3317, 24814, 3357, 1617, 20203, 8757, 18114, 1401, 14804, 18262, 7928, 7251, 5320, 3911, 14504, 8387, 12124, 6328, 7787, 7298, 7754, 6677, 5891, 9896, 14755, 3563, 19359, 6962, 1450, 24429, 3241, 418, 20469, 4170, 23799, 11036, 9927, 5913, 455, 5658, 7666, 12330, 20960, 5803, 5537, 8593, 20137, 4575, 692, 4593, 7286, 10667, 7182, 22389, 1310, 13838, 18879, 2695, 6905, 3898, 19437, 1314, 10843, 15776, 2959, 9459, 12143, 22799, 15131, 1055, 5058, 23108, 14805, 25315, 6988, 22369, 10333, 3829, 8906, 8847, 20818, 10288, 147, 6656, 22543, 25494, 23768, 3928, 20471, 19406, 23199, 5845, 8101, 21815, 14637, 22471, 21176, 1651, 12369, 4489, 6568, 12542, 1667, 12810, 14039, 1370, 3353, 11561, 12575, 19576, 13255, 18443, 11243, 7688, 16108, 15774, 4360, 24952, 10551, 18802, 20303, 5165, 4252, 24449, 5747, 13422, 8653, 16812, 21434, 24827, 4380, 20953, 1883, 11850, 509, 14389, 4437, 12202, 13567, 14105, 17252, 11134, 2828, 14542, 5633, 24430, 7876, 23156, 20127, 17035, 10705, 21104, 24975, 9067, 9407, 9376, 17443, 1821, 3859, 16952, 8696, 3976, 4003, 25156, 10848, 13713, 6045, 19478, 19513, 22893, 8749, 17281, 8066, 4273, 13650, 666, 21088, 15106, 6792, 22831, 9809, 12113, 19019, 12189, 21239, 4916, 558, 13121, 24884, 23598, 24702, 10659, 22868, 3125, 19830, 14553, 22225, 20655, 20181, 14894, 614, 10379, 4956, 13099, 22403, 4884, 1010, 23525, 1093, 1951, 7582, 24186, 16079, 4836, 8832, 21036, 11890, 6023, 3663, 19942, 7977, 7406, 19450, 6107, 10175, 12932, 16095, 13318, 8585, 9156, 12967, 7515, 18481, 6345, 17593, 24799, 12120, 13112, 12179, 16309, 7267, 4851, 6629, 16317, 24101, 6449, 20900, 6206, 1840, 704, 21209, 17496, 23898, 13532, 564, 3846, 17446, 15489, 23300, 5402, 21342, 11920, 19255, 12028, 5194, 1582, 6049, 7710, 9221, 14512, 24358, 10271, 10310, 8397, 14736, 6711, 11853, 11908, 10252, 13818, 13259, 5600, 1350, 7734, 19303, 9854, 1941, 6081, 23563, 16514, 2423, 20764, 14682, 8367, 8960, 20267, 7617, 14106, 1898, 16630, 5906, 24587, 17661, 3596, 21778, 20354, 25023, 3515, 16929, 19452, 6888, 311, 1064, 4023, 17094, 13737, 8340, 5705, 10911, 5510, 16385, 19694, 729, 4181, 22145, 16142, 4806, 14563, 944, 18510, 10148, 7321, 25192, 2719, 10462, 23260, 5070, 7598, 15712, 14021, 4337, 21588, 21423, 24237, 19502, 8279, 12500, 6633, 12127, 7047, 9319, 5404, 16843, 6016, 3240, 7222, 3747, 14250, 9547, 10079, 9042, 11314, 21961, 22591, 2908, 6104, 22181, 16497, 14011, 369, 12381, 12005, 18972, 21389, 11534, 20264, 7632, 5818, 5166, 864, 16212, 18717, 19235, 4552, 25284, 3253, 16050, 1220, 13272, 19801, 20769, 13724, 16893, 22022, 2039, 12013, 5697, 22546, 12140, 6752, 2, 12436, 16233, 9660, 12408, 7074, 21045, 11760, 1646, 24490, 10351, 1469, 5649, 412, 15309, 6077, 16247, 11902, 2007, 35, 9052, 18686, 21282, 717, 8205, 21402, 7133 ]
reddit_dump_-2341
[ [ "> I would live closest to him and he had a 401k through his job. No property, I'm assuming life insurance through his job again since he worked for the school district in California.\n\nOkay, so there are a number of ways a 401k and life insurance can be set up. Best case scenario, there was a \"named beneficiary\" on each. Presumably you and/or your sister. That means the money doesn't have to go through probate, is not part of his estate, doesn't have to be used to pay his bills, can go directly to whomever he named. That will be something to look into *if* it comes to that. So sorry you are going through this.", "325" ], [ "> before signing the lease the property manager\n\nWhen does the lease expire?\n\n > I assume the building would be at its weakest when it's dug up, before the work is complete\n\nIf it's done properly is is temporarily strengthened while the permanent retrofit is installed. It is not weaker or more vulnerable.\n\n > I have a few days to appeal the THP decision that I don't have to relocate.\n\nThe city has presumably approved the THP. What are the grounds for your appeal?\n\n > would it be better to try and negotiate with the management company/landlord before appealing?\n\nWhat would you want to negotiate? To cancel your lease?\n\n > And do the recent earthquakes even constitute grounds (no pun intended) for an appeal in the first place?\n\nNo. Much like hurricanes in Florida or tornados in the midwest, they are just a fact of life.", "790" ], [ "> how do I go about fighting these charges? \n\nHire a criminal defense attorney and speak to NO ONE about this other than that attorney. Self-defense laws vary by state.\n\nAlso understand that if your molestation took place when you were a minor (which is presumed by your current age) you can still file a police report about it in most states, and can sue for civil damages in most states. This is something to go over with your attorney; the molestation could potentially be a mitigating factor. And you have no idea what your brother told the police, other than it was his side of the story. Your side of the story is for court, though, not for anyone else except your attorney. Good luck.", "716" ], [ "Filial responsibility laws are laws that make third parties (usually adult children) responsible for support for indigent family members. Georgia's version, however, has been a toothless for the most part. Still, it does exist.\n\nWhen she passes, you will not be responsible for anything unless you co-signed or somehow put your name as a responsible party on anything. When you put her in a home for example what did you personally sign, anything? Or was all paperwork done by her?\n\nYou can call [Adult Protective Services](_URL_0_) and also get a social worker for her, who will know what local resources are available. \n\n > Adult Protective Services (APS) is the state entity charged with investigating all reports of abuse, neglect, and/or exploitation of older persons (65+) or an adult (18+) with a disability who do not reside in long-term care facilities pursuant to the Disabled Adults and Elder Persons Protection Act, O.C.G.A. §§ 30-5-1, et seq.\n > \n > Types of abuse include [...] Self-Neglect", "843" ], [ "> She helped find someone to fill the space after she left, but it wasn't a lease takeover.\n\nDid that person stay for the rest of the term and pay full rent?\n\n > Can they really sue her for the entire balance of her lease when they filled the apartment like a month later, and were no longer losing money?\n\nThey can sue her for whatever they want but they can't double-dip; they won't win if it can be demonstrated that they were receiving rent for that period.", "790" ], [ "He took two RedBulls from you? I don't think the police will come out for that. The $80 speakers and other items perhaps, but most likely BIL would have to go down to the police station to file a report for the theft. This is a criminal issue, some sort of petty theft, but what will happen depends on a lot of other factors, including what state you live in.\n\nAlternately, suing him for the value of the items he took is a civil issue, but you're not going to sue him over two energy drinks, and your BIL is probably not going to sue him over $80 plus the other items. And if he did sue and win, how would he collect?\n\nGenerally speaking you should always assume that anyone in the US unauthorized, without proper documentation, can be deported.", "712" ], [ "> NC obligates all drivers who are involved in an accident to stop. Once a driver is fully stopped, he or she must provide another driver, passenger, or pedestrian assistance (if needed) and disclose relevant information like their name, number, and insurance company information to another party. This law is even applicable in circumstances in accidents that don't involve other people. Even if a motorist damages property due to an accident, the driver must stop, write down their information, and put it in a place that an owner or occupants can access it. The failure to fulfill the duty to stop may lead to hit and run charges.\n\nAlso, if more than $1000 damage was done, legally you have to call the police.\n\nHow much damage was done, did you damage anyone else's property?", "667" ], [ "> we told them we would just give them what we had (probably a sixteenth of an ounce of weed, a couple grinders, papers, a one-hiter, and a vaporizer) if that would end the whole situation\n\nWhy do folks do this? Trying to be constructive here, hire a criminal defense attorney and don't talk to anyone about this. Yes, it's possible that the charges are thrown out, but it's more likely they'll be reduced... if you have an attorney. What you all REALLY want is called \"Pre-Trial Diversion\" which is sort of like probation and if you complete it successfully it will (almost) be like this never happened. If you don't, you're facing up to six months in jail and a $1000 file plus court costs for the possession, and up to a $10,000 fine for the paraphernalia. For each of you.", "24" ], [ "> I just genuinely didn’t know what the best thing to do was. \n\nIn the heat of the moment, it's tough, I get it. Best thing to do (usually) is to not try to argue or negotiate. Those things happen in court. If they behaved improperly, or even if they broke laws, in the heat of the moment trying to address those issues doesn't resolve anything. You can always say \"I do not consent to a search.\" You can always refuse to open the door when the police come. If they come in anyway (if they have a warrant or exigent circumstances, which was their claim here) then just refusing to talk. Generally all talking can do it make everything last longer, and in some cases, can make things worse.\n\n > I’ll get in touch with an attorney on Monday.\n\nYes, depending on your county, Pre-Trial Diversion is (IMO) the way to go. [Here's information for Jefferson County.](_URL_0_)\n\n > *Pretrial Prosecutor Diversion is a voluntary option that provides alternative handling of criminal charges. The charges can be dismissed and expunged if the program is successfully completed. The purpose of the program is to enforce justice and enhance public safety by addressing the root cause of the behavior that resulted in charges being filed. This program can reduce the stigma associated with having a criminal conviction, restore victims, and conserve court and criminal justice resources.*\n​", "260" ], [ "> She wants him out but wont do anything.\n\nTo get him out, she has to do something. If he's not on a lease with anyone, he's a de facto month to month tenant, and she can give him 30 day written notice to vacate. Then if he leaves, great, she can change the locks. And call the police if he returns. If he doesn't leave within the 30 days, she takes him (really, them) to court and evicts them. Once the sheriff comes to remove them, then she can change the locks. And call the police if he returns.", "790" ], [ "This is a delicate situation. You don't want to pressure her to report it. She's already been taken advantage of once and pressured into doing something. She needs to make this decision on her own, so she owns the decision. You can of course be supportive.\n\nI would tell her to start [here](_URL_0_).\n\n > Michigan Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force\n > \n > MSP CCU has oversight over the statewide Michigan Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force. The task force includes over 50 federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies who work together to investigate offenders who use the internet, online communication systems, or computer technology to sexually exploit children.\n\nIn answer to your original questions:\n\n1. Probably not, and it's HIGHLY unlikely that he deleted everything, so he would still be in possession.\n2. It's theoretically possible, but highly unlikely. The government typically does not want to punish victims. She can of course go to an attorney first and have a consultation.\n3. See links for VA with their statutes as well as Federal.\n4. No.\n5. Her testimony is evidence. Screenshots of TEXT are good too, and chats, but she doesn't need to worry about this. All she can do is tell the truth and let the ICAC take it from there.", "119" ], [ "> Does my mom owe me hundreds of thousands in child support she spent on herself?\n\nNo. Except in the rarest instances on excepting only a very few specific items, there is simply no requirement that the child support receiving parent ever has to account for how the child support money is spent. Whether we like it or not, the bottom line is that there is no accounting for how child support money is spent.", "843" ], [ "> she definitely wants to report it if it will \"do any good\" so to speak\n\nThere's no way to know for certain, but here's one possible scenario. She reports it, giving her testimony and a few chats. ICAC contacts either the FBI or Virginia State Police (or both) and based on the information she gives, they obtain a warrant to search his house for illicit materials (not just of her but of anyone; people like this generally aren't one-timers). They search the house, take the computers, and their forensic teams scour the computers for more evidence. If they find any evidence, then they move forward with that evidence to bringing charges against him. Even if they find nothing, which seems improbable, they can interrogate him and often people slip up in these situations.\n\nThere are no guarantees, except that if she does nothing, then nothing will happen (unless another victim comes forward). But again, it's her choice to make.", "260" ], [ "A boundary or boundary fence is a fence that is located on or *near* a property line. In Indiana:\n\n > A partition fence shall be built, rebuilt, and kept in repair at the cost of the property owners whose properties are enclosed or separated by the fences proportionately according to the number of rods or proportion of the fence the property owner owns along the line of the fence, whether the property owner's title is a fee simple or a life estate.\n > \n > If a property owner fails or refuses to compensate for building, rebuilding, or repairing the property owner's portion of a partition fence, another property owner who is interested in the fence, after having built, rebuilt, or repaired the property owner's portion of the fence, shall give to the defaulting property owner or the defaulting property owner's agent or tenant twenty (20) days notice to build, rebuild, or repair the defaulting property owner's portion of the fence. If the defaulting property owner or the defaulting property owner's agent or tenant fails to build, rebuild, or repair the fence within twenty (20) days, the complaining property owner shall notify the township trustee of the township in which the properties are located of the default.\n\nThere's more [here](_URL_0_). Are these the codes you're referring to?", "623" ], [ "> I just want my watch back and this guy to pay for his crimes.\n\nHe's probably already sold the watch. He will pay for his crimes if the police decide to pursue, there's not much you can do on that front. Your option is to sue him in small claims court.\n\n$10k seems high for a standard Submariner though. Did it have a ceramic bezel? And American Express may be curious why you bought a watch and then turned around to sell a brand new watch, just to have it stolen... it looks mildly suspicious. In any case the criminal case against him is in the hands of the state, the civil case against him is one that you can choose to bring.", "467" ], [ "They can be, sure, I've been in ones like that. \n\nThere are so many factors though. Magnitude is just one. Intensity, depth, duration are others.\n\nThen on your end, there are three big ones: elevation (are you on the 15th floor of a building?), distance from quake, and the type of ground under you. If under you is (for example) clay on top of bedrock, it's often not as bad.\n\nIn the Northridge quake, a friend in CA who was in Northridge woke up to see his grand piano hit his ceiling.", "270" ], [ "> Why would you need to argue a law that's VERY CLEAR?\n\nThat's how the law works. And very few laws are actually clear. Your third link shows that. But you don't argue the law so much as you argue the facts of your claim.\n\n > That's why I posted the 3rd link\n\nEach one of those links is an actual lawsuit where they had to argue the facts of a case to have a court or jury come to that conclusion. Every one of those cases on your 3rd link was argued. Everyone one of those was expensive. \n\nAnyone can sue anyone for anything, and the place the merits (or lack thereof) concerning a lawsuit are decided is in court. It's the only place it *can* be decided in a civil lawsuit, unless the parties all agree to some other remedy before the trial.\n\nWhen you file a lawsuit, the court clerk doesn't read it and say \"hey this is legitimate Fair Use!\" They just file it. Only a judge or a jury can make that determination, if one party is hell-bent on pursuing a case.\n\nAnd to reiterate, YouTube doesn't care, nor do they have to, except in some narrow instances to keep their safe harbor protections.\n\nThe stupidest lawsuit I was ever involved with ended with a summary judgment, which is basically when the judge says this is too stupid to move forward. Even that case took more than a year until the motion for summary judgment was granted.", "712" ], [ "> What my comment referred to was why do \"organizations\" not follow very clear court cases that have won.\n\nWhen it comes to YouTube, they can just say \"take it down\" and it doesn't cost them anything, no court, etc. I understand the public utility argument, but at present it is not a public utility.\n\nAlso, humans are... human. They have egos. People believe they are right. And sometimes a case that seems like a lost cause actually works out for the plaintiff, [unfortunately](_URL_0_). I know enough about music to have scratched my head at that verdict.\n\nBut sometimes what you think does happen. The lawsuit against the <PERSON> Brothers was recently dropped. A filmmaker made a film very similar to *Stranger Things* and more than that, he met with the <PERSON> to pitch the idea to them of a series based on the film. It's not surprising that when the show came out he thought \"holy hell, they stole that from me.\" He hired a law firm and files a lawsuit. But this year he was provided with evidence (this is all pre-trial) that their concept was starting to take shape in 2010, a few years before he made his movie or met them. Presuming that the evidence was legitimate, he dropped his case. Sometimes multiple people come up with similar ideas independently. But also consider that he's one guy, without deep pockets. Warner Bros. knew for decades that they didn't have the rights to *Happy Birthday* but they kept suing and winning and collecting royalties anyway.", "138" ], [ "You would be violating various trademarks, and in some cases copyright. Doesn't matter if you make money or not. Doesn't matter if you change the name of the character or change the clothing. \n\nYou are free to draw whatever you like. If you want to *distribute* or *publish* it, for free or for money, then it needs to be something that a) you created, or b) is in the public domain, or c) you have permission from the rights holder to use.", "48" ], [ "> So there is no requirement to check the left side mirror before making a left turn?\n\n/u/Cypher_Blue can correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe any law requires the *use* of a mirror. There is a law (California Vehicle Code, Section 26709) requiring at least two rear-view mirrors to be present, and there are laws about signaling and driving safely, but no specific law saying a driver must use their rearview mirror. Not even sure how that would be enforced.", "523" ], [ "> She said she wanted to talk tonight.\n\nNo talking to anyone about this. But if you refuse to listen to that advice, at the very least, no discussing it on text, email, or anything electronic that can be saved and used as evidence, nor any phone calls that could be recorded. Really the only person you should be speaking with is your attorney. If the police contact you, do have zero obligation to speak to them. Remember they can lie. They can make up things to get you to \"confess\" to things you don't remember, they can say \"we have 3 witnesses who saw you do it\" when they have no witnesses. They can say \"we have an iPhone video of the event\" when there is no such video. They can say \"we just want you hear 'your side of the story' so we can close the case and move on\" when they have no intention of closing the case or moving on. You don't have to go down to the station. You don't have to open the door if they come knocking (unless they have a warrant). Taking to the police cannot in any way help you, only hurt you.", "260" ], [ "In any harassment situation, the first thing you need to do is to report it to HR or the manager/owner. You have no obligation to tell the person who is doing it to stop (though you are free to). Once you have told HR/manager/owner then they have a duty to make sure the harassment stops. If it does not stop, then you have legal options, such as [filing a complaint](_URL_0_) with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (\"DFEH\"). With only two weeks left, it may not be feasible to report it now and expect any sort of governmental action if management fails to comply, but that option is still available to you (as well as to your co-workers) and your \"next steps\" would be to report it to HR/management/owner and see if they put an end to it.", "716" ], [ "> Is there anything I can do to report this guy without possibly getting this blown back on me for working for him for around a 3 week period?\n\nYes. Willfully failing to withhold and deposit employment taxes is fraud. You can report his tax fraud to the [IRS](_URL_1_) \n\nNot paying you correctly for all hours worked and overtime is also illegal. Contact the [Ohio Department of Commerce](_URL_0_) to file a complaint and speak to an investigator about unpaid minimum wage, overtime, or prevailing wage. Phone: <PHONE_NUMBER>.\n\nYelling at employees is generally not actionable, unless he's yelling at people based on their race, religion, gender, national origin, etc. (Protected class status.) He can yell at someone for taking time off to go to a funeral, it's not illegal, it's just being an ass.", "602" ], [ "> I returned a jury summons requesting my service be postponed and never heard back on if it was approved\n\nThen you absolutely need to go. \n\n > *Those jurors who are beginning their first day of jury service on MONDAY, JULY 8, 2019 will report to the Jury Commission Office located in ROOM 455 of the Hamilton County Courthouse on MONDAY by 8:30 AM.*\n\nWhen you get there you can talk to them about your postponement. Sorry they never got back to you. Assuming you did all this?\n\n > *If you have additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us by phone at <PHONE_NUMBER> (JURY) or via email by clicking the link to the webmaster below. Now accepting jury summons responses and excuse/postponement requests by email. Email: juryresponse@cms._URL_0_. Responses must be scanned in as an attachment. Do NOT respond in the body of an email.*", "691" ], [ "> Management has done nothing about the situation. \n\nThen you and/or your co-workers can file a complaint with DFEH at the link above. Sit down right now and write as best as you can remember the dates and times of the events (the harassment, and the talks with managers). What dates (as best you can remember) both these events happened, what they said, who else was witness, etc. And keep this journal for the next two weeks as well. Doesn't have to be perfect.", "716" ], [ "> not being allowed to take lunches\n\nIllegal. You can report [here](_URL_0_). They have to provide lunch breaks or they pay (you) a meal penalty. You are owed money.\n\n > company refuses to disclose hours on paystub\n\nIllegal in CA. Report it as well.\n\n > no breaks\n\nPaid short breaks are required in CA. Report.\n\n > constantly belittling me\n\nLegal, so long as it's not based on protected class status.\n\n > accusing me of doing things I’m not doing, even with proof I didn’t do things\n\nLegal.", "602" ], [ "I can't find a definitive answer on this. In my state that's the way it works. I've looked at about 20 websites because I started to get obsessed with the answer. Do ask a California attorney about it.\n\nA company can only sue for $5000 in CA unless it's a sole proprietorship. It may be that a corporate officer can represent the company. In any case, don't trust me, get confirmation but she sounds crazy for filing this lawsuit so hopefully she's ignorant as well, for your sake. Good luck!", "712" ], [ "He can sue you at any point. File an injunction, sue for defamation. Public figurers, however, have far less protection from defamation than do private figures. From your description he'd certainly be considered a public figure:\n\n > The Virginia courts generally require a high level of public activity before a plaintiff becomes a limited-purpose public figure. The definition of a limited-purpose public figure is covered in the general Actual Malice and Negligence section of this guide under the limited-purpose public figures discussion (scroll down to the topic heading \"limited-purpose public figures\"). In Virginia, courts look at the following factors in determining whether a plaintiff is a limited-purpose public figure:\n > \n > 1. whether the plaintiff had access to channels of effective communication; \n > 2. whether the plaintiff voluntarily assumed a role of special prominence in a public controversy; \n > 3. whether the plaintiff sought to influence the resolution or outcome of the controversy; \n > 4. whether the controversy existed prior to the publication of the defamatory statements; and \n > 5. whether the plaintiff retained public figure status at the time of the alleged defamation.\n > \n > *<PERSON> v. Forbes, Inc.*, 259 F.3d 273, 280 (2001) \n\nIf you're going to have an actor pretending to be this person and putting words in \"his\" mouth you better be able to back that up with people you interview saying that he said those things, and not just because you prodded them into it. For the recre material I would speak with a local attorney versed in this area of law to give you general guidelines.\n\nBut overall you do have more rights here than you would making a documentary about a private citizen, and I would also suggest reaching out to _URL_0_ for support and guidance. Good luck.", "936" ], [ "> However, on my birthday her father sent me some pretty awful messages about my dead mother and brother.\n\nWhy? That's horrible. Block them, don't LET them send you ANY messages.\n\n > If I take out a billboard in both the metroplex and his small town, would I be liable for anything? Can I post his phone number? Facebook Link? Name?\n\nWhat? Are asking if you'll be charged with harassment? Take the high ground here and ignore. If you do this, you'll just be showing these people that they have power over you. They will be so very satisfied to see that they got under your skin so much that you spent all this money.", "716" ] ]
284
[ 20999, 15043, 17614, 18611, 7058, 10708, 10832, 16270, 9663, 11921, 20976, 20629, 21404, 1218, 8861, 15907, 23861, 14236, 6220, 4995, 21000, 2107, 13887, 19526, 20776, 11999, 21147, 21550, 23596, 22668, 12844, 22201, 19310, 23642, 14733, 16258, 23951, 3109, 16892, 22392, 4077, 1584, 6828, 16750, 10357, 13913, 23894, 16705, 18272, 22308, 3551, 16337, 22749, 24424, 7149, 22103, 1071, 13851, 18476, 4392, 8647, 21213, 3233, 17639, 17739, 13573, 16483, 75, 21366, 22086, 24330, 251, 20340, 21120, 3697, 18044, 8873, 10766, 19109, 10897, 6961, 23826, 9264, 15475, 9045, 13843, 17300, 2675, 4714, 1612, 25137, 18765, 18447, 18639, 847, 14797, 13344, 8974, 6082, 25474, 7832, 10552, 1117, 4499, 24507, 5699, 14147, 19863, 3167, 1079, 17498, 24269, 3201, 25184, 14238, 7187, 21421, 14771, 23983, 21751, 21459, 9129, 21884, 11863, 23042, 4699, 16976, 10402, 7332, 7561, 25287, 15435, 11994, 21689, 18078, 21238, 15247, 17030, 6037, 4072, 3347, 6274, 19248, 11980, 24989, 2787, 21890, 16628, 7662, 16326, 1273, 1256, 10744, 2080, 1560, 4774, 3003, 17056, 9191, 11892, 5648, 19614, 5356, 20933, 6731, 2935, 6316, 24174, 14786, 3271, 9228, 13972, 10598, 5967, 7033, 4139, 15968, 5420, 10189, 22589, 23895, 3269, 21636, 12136, 1253, 17276, 23356, 8383, 5288, 15992, 23727, 20436, 16584, 16140, 10794, 23339, 22906, 19840, 6666, 18390, 15420, 14085, 445, 4055, 6369, 19680, 11640, 3085, 18738, 25404, 100, 6171, 4411, 18333, 1778, 13009, 17599, 3721, 7247, 8227, 11571, 1953, 19850, 7128, 23188, 22491, 11798, 18031, 25235, 6509, 3256, 24443, 2035, 24113, 22558, 7940, 17418, 9099, 24028, 7909, 1229, 6137, 20794, 15105, 21465, 5988, 8108, 7051, 18778, 24775, 13017, 2420, 20816, 14781, 23820, 18115, 13094, 13269, 3447, 865, 13460, 16760, 2849, 22419, 17040, 5500, 19439, 6877, 22310, 4278, 22409, 8558, 1781, 8221, 12964, 14099, 6838, 11754, 16329, 5962, 13908, 21218, 12984, 12543, 6388, 23124, 1567, 20063, 4933, 24146, 6850, 21291, 6880, 14791, 3089, 24648, 8389, 21229, 21940, 8773, 8384, 2716, 12200, 3816, 20616, 8218, 7348, 21441, 16073, 19444, 10996, 7908, 21219, 23764, 8327, 17229, 20877, 22679, 13508, 12691, 18400, 19530, 17547, 11831, 768, 21511, 10697, 7030, 10865, 23670, 2089, 12102, 24262, 18018, 6555, 449, 20043, 16187, 24003, 12893, 23884, 825, 17853, 12601, 12312, 11302, 11334, 797, 14448, 10977, 4352, 2946, 408, 20428, 7759, 3705, 21043, 8450, 3197, 21719, 8509, 16540, 8812, 17455, 7568, 24244, 12757, 20190, 8592, 993, 11398, 17406, 19329, 24855, 12051, 14294, 15158, 16015, 10671, 14020, 23335, 20338, 21989, 12744, 132, 24863, 2654, 24354, 6543, 5068, 1779, 15076, 19797, 16342, 18113, 2015, 21197, 22569, 16288, 10782, 2123, 92, 21978, 24917, 3422, 20305, 12949, 20621, 19725, 11707, 24983, 12783, 13058, 17275, 13635, 21493, 17267, 13834, 17126, 20013, 18805, 5976, 5532, 11935, 21975, 5966, 10746, 16277, 14901, 9507, 21861, 17821, 17769, 14680, 3954, 6236, 16539, 8478, 19401, 16256, 18632, 25338, 15633, 9830, 8217, 23653, 16865, 24870, 10045, 4940, 8202, 19151, 11059, 13701, 13299, 24943, 11372, 739, 13687, 143, 400, 10390, 23571, 8493, 19175, 11336, 19024, 21574, 15228, 23757, 6397, 19372, 4887, 17497, 14484, 5018, 19095, 23164, 20131, 3800, 595, 6103, 6824, 1245, 23398, 16412, 17881, 2909, 11580, 13889, 11148, 21679, 22664, 14524, 4479, 17915, 12861, 21231, 367 ]
reddit_dump_-ArchitectOfThought-
[ [ "I'm saying I don't believe sexual assault occurred. Read what the court's live twitter summarization in the article. This chick was in a hotel room fucking multiple people openly. She was not raped. When I looked into this when the story hit like 2 years ago now IINM, it was quite obviously regret sex. After the \"victim\" told her friend the events that transpired, It was the \"victims\" friend who decided she was raped.", "454" ], [ "As far as I'm aware, there is no jury. The judge made the call, and acquited the boys because there was no proof it wasn't consensual, the girl's story changed everytime she told someone (police, the court, her friend) and the person who actually reported the crime as rape was her friend who the judge criticized as not being credible for having not actually witnessed any of the events. \n\nUsusally, you'd be correct: not guilty doesn't equal innocent, but in this particular case where it's he said, vs he said, vs she said, and her story doesn't make any sense, and one boy's story makes more sense, but less sense than it should, and the third boy's story makes sense, it becomes fairly obvious what likely happened that night.", "878" ], [ "I'm not short, so I have no personal issue with this, but I think this is a pretty stupid opinion. Women are fairly open that they absolutely discriminate based on height, a non-changable genetic characterstic before the man even has a chance to demonstrate his personality.\n\nFurthermore, it's 2018; no one cares what your \"substance\" is. People get together now by swiping 1 picture on tinder. It's not like people are having sex because they are so impressed by the moral fortitude of some person they met at a cancer walkathon...\n\nIf people cared about substance, the people most often being sexually rewarded would be very different.", "238" ], [ "If you are so drunk that you lose touch with your surroundings and end up having sex without being able to tell whether it was consensual or not, then that's on the complainant to change their life choices, not the legal system to accommodate for their poor behavior and lack of responsibility.\n\nThe reason the <PERSON> case was a gaslight for so many was because the media and the various complainants did a pretty serious smear campaign and turned it into a feminist/SJW issue. I'll admit some of the things he was accused of doing I wouldn't necessarily be something I'd want to defend in a court of law, but the fact was the main complainant went to court with a poor and inconsistent case and was demonstrated to be so by <PERSON>'s lawyer. The success of the justice system was vaunted as a failure for society that the court of public opinion didn't match the court of justice's verdict.\n\nOn top of that, <PERSON>'s lawyer was a woman, so the feminists were angry that a woman was acting as an agent of the patriarchy to tear other women down.", "504" ], [ "Focal reps claimed this was an intentional design choice. They didn't indicate why, only that as far as the technical side was concerned, they could either institute a crackle or let the sound distort(??). They opted for crackle.\n\nBut as you say, some believe it's just bad QC and they sort of tried to cover it up with \"oh yea, that's totally intentional...\". Either way, the crackle wasn't supposed to happen until well around 90db which is well into ear damage territory, but some people claimed to be getting it on their Elex around 65 even.", "872" ], [ "To be fair dude, you came in at a bad time in which the community \\(not even just FS community...this is a news story in the gaming community as a whole\\) is dealing with some drama. \n\nAs far as insights go, Reddit disallows self promotion, so you can pretty much only post videos in the video thread in which people can actually communicate their thoughts and demonstrations. \n\nIf you have specific questions about procedures or something, it's best just to ask.", "945" ], [ "> How exactly? \n\nBecause it is...? It's like an insurance company not covering you because you broke your arm when you were 9. It's unreasonable and trashy.\n\n > and comes here with the (dishonest) implication that he was discriminated against. \n\nThen tell him he's wrong given the very awkward, and entitled post he's written.\n\n > I don't doubt that the reason he was passed over for a job is because he is legitimately a psycho,\n\nNow you're just deliberately being insulting, with no proof or reason to believe that. Being entitled and being a psycho are two different things. \n\n > In reality, it is apparent from OP's post history that he is a racist and misogynist\n\nIt's 2018, those words don't even mean anything. Black people commit more crime, and women make bad firefighters. I must be a rape-crazy southern plantation owner, with a monocle and a collection of mandingos right? lol. \n\n > and his behaviour and attitudes online are reflective of his character and behaviour offline\n\nNo they aren't. Anyone with a middle school understanding of psychology knows that. Unless you've met him offline, you can't with any intellectual honesty claim this.\n\n > Going off of his Reddit ramblings, if he expresses even 1/10th of what he's said online, it makes perfect sense as to why he didn't get a job.\n\nThis is just obnoxious. I'm not even trying to defend the kid...he sounds like a troll, but you're just as obnoxious dude.", "402" ], [ "> the issue of capacity to consent isn’t limited to people under the influence of alcohol. Many times someone may not be able to provide consent, including people with disabilities/cognitive impairment, people who are underage, etc. Just saying “take responsibility for yourself” ignores the larger issue of other times when capacity to consent is unclear. It’s a significant problem when trying to prove things “beyond a reasonable doubt.”\n\nI don't disagree, but trying to fuck someone with developmental disabilities who has no idea what's going on (and I know several people this happened to) isn't the same thing as a women doing things at parties and deciding next morning it made them uncomfortable = rape. I think this is a common stand in our culture today and it's a serious issue for a myriad of reasons. \n\n > the decision to take a case to trial rests with the prosecutor, not the victims. This wasn’t a civil trial. Clearly the prosecutor thought the case was able to stand trial.\n\nRight, but in order to get to that stage there has to be a case with an accused and a complainant. They opted to go to the police and present a rape case. They didn't have to do that. It probably would have been better for everyone had this girl and her friend simply decided it was a bad experience and not to repeat it. \n\n > some people (and it wasn’t all women or al feminists) chose to voice concern that the lawyer for <PERSON> was a woman, but I have heard similar complaints when lawyers defend terrorists, pedophiles, etc. The lawyer made the right choice to prosecute the case, because it’s her job to represent her client.\n\nI agree. I wasn't chastising <PERSON>'s lawyer, only using it as an example of people not understanding the court of public opinion is unreasonable.", "454" ], [ "Your write-up is kind of all-over-the-road, but I get what you're saying. You're touching on a LOT of things here. I think you're going to find a hard time getting good engagement because this subreddit is far more left-wing progressive than Destiny himself, which I find rather odd, but most of the commenters in _URL_0_ are exactly the people who cause the problem. \n\nLook, ultimately, feminism and SJW progressive gender stuff is mostly a massive gaslight performed by people with a chip on their shoulder in regards to \"cis\" gender politics. \n\nModern feminism is for the most part a monolithic cult pushing logically indefensible lines of argumentation and they will say anything, including denying objective facts, in order to perpetuate the idea that women have it worse than men in every possible way. All pros are secretly somehow cons. All privileges are secretly somehow disadvantages. All cons are secretly somehow oppression. \n\nMen are not going to get help for this or anything else because women certainly aren't invested in these kinds of things and men in general are not collectivist actors or thinkers, so we're mostly on our own. Furthermore, the deification of women isn't going to stop, at least not anytime soon. Really, most of the issues I think women face are either self-imposed, or are intrinsic components of being female.\n\nAll you can do is tow the line, and be the kind of rational actor you want to see more of. Lots of people will just call you an incel and laugh simply because you acknowledge descriptive facts about the experiences of, say, men on Tinder.\n\nLike, I get where you're coming from, but there's kind of not a lot to say on it other than...we just have to suck it up. That's part of being a man, ironically.", "278" ], [ "> Isn't this pretty sad? This gives me anxiety sometimes. That there are no groups ready to \"take us in\" or that women might not participate in this change or at least won't start doing it on their own without any instigation from men first.\n\nI mean RedPill and Incel culture will take you in. Some would say that is a problem, and certainly to some extent it is, but that is the consequences of the actions of progressives. It's a vicious circle. \n\n > <PERSON> recent videos on these matters have made me gain hope that there could be a new wave of male-focused movements or online groups that don't focus on either side (either relentlessly shitting on women or men). He does this \"be the change you want to see\" really well (atleast imo).\n\nActually, you know what? I will take back what I said that there's no hope. \n\nIt is true that there is a desire for more reasoned actors in this space, Aba and Preach being one channel that initially grew to fame by pointing out descriptive truths on both sides.", "244" ], [ "Your post and reply is a really good example of why the left wing and progressives often have such a hard time winning over the vast majority of Americans/westerners who are not married to these kinds of concepts and often drive the actual push towards cultural and civic changes.\n\nYou are playing fast and loose with concepts that you absolutely cannot play fast and loose with because you obviously are emotionally charged and agenda driven. \n\nGoing to an antebellum party is in no way synonymous with supporting white supremacy. Actively supporting white supremacy requires intent, and pre-meditation. What she committed was racial insensitivity when she was a member of an American demographic that didn't care about racial insensitivity. \n\nClaiming her actions or CH's actions support white supremacy is tantamount to deliberately lying to sell a social position. \n\nI am not white. I am perfectly aware of the history of blacks. What blacks need to advance in society is not white people on reddit doing performative woke justice that ignores descriptive facts to finger-wag white people into complete submission. That's how you get presidents with bad fake tans making half the USA feel like you are zeitgeisting them enough to attempt a revolution in tactical gear they got off Amazon.", "68" ], [ "I completely agree that if you're a left wing progressive, your goal should be manifesting a world where people question their approach to whatever you believe to be problematic. I am not a progressive so I do not believe in any of this, but this *should* be your goal if you do...\n\nHowever, supporting people making asinine social commentary because they're black, and then simp'ing for her when she reaps what she sows isn't going to accomplish that. Instead it just looks like your champion is an intellectual coward who shouldn't have been your champion in the first place. This is not deradicalizing or depolarizing. \n\nProgressivism (especially in this franchise) is a vocal minority. Most people are very centrist and even if they don't put any thought into these issues, they will see the optics. And the optics of a black pundit being in-people's-face constantly about woke ethics and then runs away when people attack her back is really really really bad. It's not in any way convincing. You have to pay attention to the narrative and the narrative you guys are pushing is incoherent at best. \n\nIf I was a centrist fan of this franchise and I was plugged in enough to be following this drama, I would not be impressed with the character on display of almost anyone involved in this whole ordeal, LEAST of all the fanbase especially those from the \"main\" sub.", "522" ], [ "> This is where literally your entire argument falls apart. You can call out the “left wing and progressives” for a lot of things, but defending racism isn’t one of them\n\nWell, yea...it is...because most of what you guys deem racism isn't racism. At this point, when I hear \"so and so has been accused of racist behavior\" headlines in the news, I just assume someone stated a descriptive fact and progressive twitter is really mad about it.\n\nJust because you *say* something is racist doesn't *make* it racist. Just because you say something is white supremacy doesn't make something white supremacy. Until you (collective you and singular you) learn that usage of speech is very important when framing issues to those who are not already on your bandwagon, you will never achieve the desired ends you want in the world. \n\nSo, ironically getting rid, or converting people who think like you is your cause's greatest challenge. \n\n > You can be BIPOC and still be misinformed\n\nCorrect, but that's not what's happening here. What's happening here is I'm attempting to explain to your that your philosophical strategy for convincing people to agree with your world-view is counter-productive. You can agree or you can hand-wave. It's actually better for me if you hand-wave because I'm a social conservative and think your world-view is actively harmful so the more you keep doing it wrong, the more I achieve my net \"good\" outcome. \n\n > <PERSON> (as in throwing a party celebrating the period slavery was still legal) is racist in the same way the confederate flag represents. So are confederate flags not racist either?\n\nThis is a pivot. But I will entertain your question. \n\nIf you live in the south, owning a confederate flag is not intrinsically racist because the confederate flag represents a myriad of things to a southern American, most of which is not specifically racism. It is, however, a symbol of racism. Therefore, the intent behind owning that flag may not be racist, but the flag itself implies racism to those who view that flag as racist. \n\nHere's some food for thought: it's a social trope that people hold toga parties in college. The toga is symbolic of the Greek states and Roman Empire. The Romans had a slave-based economy and condoned slavery. They even had a ranking system for the value of a slave based on their cognitive ability and the region of the world they came from. \n\n1. Should we cancel everyone who's had a toga party?\n\n2. Is attending a toga party condoning white supremacy?", "715" ], [ "Interesting post. \n\nI think there's a misunderstanding in the manner in which these things are being accused of postmodernism. That is to say, the base argument against idpol and why it's accused of being postmodern and where the postmodernism is coming from. \n\nThe foundation of postmodernism is, as you say deconstructivism. But, it also about a rejection of objectivity and embracing subjective truths. The utility for idpols and progressives here being that this is really useful to deny inconvenient descriptive facts about the world we live in. \n\nThe problems progressives generally have is that they don't understand the utility of their own deconstructivism. That being...that you have to put it back together again in a coherent way so as to provide coherent prescriptions to equally coherent descriptions. Instead, they get lost in a rabbit hole of denying descriptive facts to perpetuate what is tantamount to mythology.\n\nThese are going to be cheap, easy, and super nut-shelled, but let's examine how this is applied with sex and gender. Progressives have deconstructed the concept of gender. So, now there are people who legitimately believe there are 10, 20, 56 genders or whatever, but they've destroyed the utility of the concept and a lot of their worldview and advocacy for certain causes is wasted because they've lost sight of the descriptive fact that sex-based gender has far more powerful utility to people both socially and psychologically **and** that how the factually descriptive nature of sex and gender is far more coherent to most people than the worldviews they've created. Further, that the descriptive understanding of the reality that they advocate for with people using neo-pronouns and being otherkin is hyper incoherent.\n\nAnother example. Let's look at feminism, sexual assault, and consent advocacy. The deconstruction of sexual encounters between two people has, in progressive circles become so subjective that the objective reality of the situation no longer matters, only the subjective rationalization of the experience usually performed by the female to justify a moment of discomfort post-hoc. Now the man is a rapist, despite his inability to read her mind, and progressives would suggest a myriad of post-hoc rationalizations of what he should have done better to ensure she not end up feeling that way, despite the hypocrisy and impossibility of that goal. \n\nWe can further do this with BLM, and their refusal to acknowledge black's committance of higher crime along with their higher likelyhood of violent interactions. Further, their destruction of the concept of policing and the realities people face on the other side of the gun.\n\nWe can further do this with economic progressivism with the ideas of feeling down-trodden and poorly deconstructing capitalist frameworks. Being against traditional concepts of capitalism, but having no real prescriptive understanding of how the world they want would be formed. Where is a $20 minimum wage going to come from? Who's going to pay? What are the ramifications of that?\n\netc. etc. \n\nIn summation, I think it's very clear postmodernism fuels modern progressivism as modern progressivism is, in a nutshell a denial of descriptive fact in favour of manifesting a subjective truth. In order to do that, it requires miss-applied decsontruction.", "278" ], [ "Well 2 things. \n\n1, even if that's completely true, and it might be, it changes nothing because a business man going to briefing presentations of briefing sessions doesn't want a 22\" laptop either. \n\n2, Professional adults aren't really the demographic that embraces extreme disposability. Like the stereotypical \"business man\" isn't buying a new macbook every year on release day. He might stay current, sure, and there are some exceptions like hollywood or industries where people like very high incomes and status is a brand, but it's young people and specifically women who've made a cult following of technology being a status symbol. \n\nI've actually known women who told me they *need* to get a macbook. I told them they can get a PC laptop that's $1000 cheaper and would actually be way faster for their purposes and their reply was that it doesn't matter. It *neeeeeds* to be a macbook.\n\nFurthermore, men are 1000% more likely to be a gamer, and would prefer a significantly cheaper laptop, or would just build a gaming rig as a desktop.", "127" ], [ "I would say what you're describing is the concept of \"my truth\". I don't think any of this requires anyone to acknowledge any individual is \"right\", only that they have a subjective truth and progressives being collectivist thinkers tend to base their foundational axioms on the rest of us taking responsibility to act in a way that accommodates for the truths of others.\n\nEg. \"*It is your responsibility to make sure black people feel safe in your presence. If you fail to do this, you are supporting a culture of white supremacy*\" ~Is a statement a postmodern progressive would likely find agreeable because it accommodates for the subjective truth of one individual, despite it's incoherence, it's fundamental disrespect for the objective reality of the situation, and your personal integrity as a free human being.", "647" ], [ "Your contention can't really be responded to because it basically amounts to \"nuh unh\". I require a lot more qualification before it approaches anything in the realm of good faith and I'd need to write a lot and do a lot before I can answer in good faith. \n\nMy best response to your question as it's currently written is that first, what those people are calling objective facts are probably not that objective and are not facts. Wage gap within feminism is a good example of something many feminist progressives would deem a fact, that is not really a fact, but an interpretation, and generally a bad one. \n\nSecond, I don't believe I claimed progressivism is the dominant stream of thought. The dominant stream of thought within America anyways is leftwing-centrism. Progressives are an extremely vocal minority within a single wing of a socio-political party of thought (liberalism). Their power derives from creating social narratives that play very badly to people who are unfamiliar with navigating or believe their to be too much risk in navigating away from those narratives. For example, \"defunding the police\" because BLM thinks that's a good idea was a popular mantra recently. It's a concept that stems from a postmodernist kernal of thought that gained actual political traction during the riots despite it being a moronic solution to a moronic interpretation of \"facts\". It didn't need any one person to push for this. The slogan came from a collection of activists who probably popularized it on twitter with hashtags. But no politician who wants to keep their left wing base happy in the middle of a race war on the streets of Portland can say \"defund the police is dumb as fuck\". Contrary, being left-wing themselves, and not black, and under pressure to be \"woke\", they are far more likely to believe the idea has way more merit than it truly does.\n\nThird, there is a big difference between the *type* of liberal you are. We are talking about post-modernist progressives in this conversation. We aren't talking about relatively pedestrian left-of-center democrats. We're not talking about <PERSON>'s ethics or politics. We're talking about people like <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, AOC... Getting into twitch/twitter/youtube progressivism... there are a ton of content creators who \"thought-lead\" with significant followings who preach postmodernism especially in the leftist, socialist, and trans community. \n\nBut further, postmodernism isn't necessarily a concept preached by any specific person. It is a pervasive manner of approaching a topic that can be exemplified by anyone. The problem is certain types of people tend to indulge in those kinds of thought-processes more often and certain categories of thought are built upon it. For example, so-called '4th wave feminism' is almost entirely an exercise in postmodernist verbal diarrhoea. \n\nSo in short, It's not like a single person is the boogey-man for modern progressive postmodernism. I can provide you examples of ideologies many people may hold that are postmodernist. The ideas I've written so far are absolutely ideas a significant number of people hold (feminism, gender abolitionism, identity politics). If you disagree, there's not really anything I can do for you unless you cite very specific examples and cite exactly what specifically about them you'd like supported.", "278" ], [ "I dont agree with your interpretation of history, but ignoring that, it is the weakest component of the 3 or 4 arguments I put forward and the least necessary to make my argument coherent. \n\nLet's just say we agree that the concept of a plantation inherently requires slaves to fulfill our concept of...plantation'ing (?). Ok, so we can agree that plantations arent cool. That is mostly irrelevant to either the south's cultural connection to that time period, ball gowns, or the power of an 18yr old's mind to divine the future and/or care about the opinions of a specific demographic of people for no reason.", "180" ], [ "Wrong. Youre just thinking one-dimensionally. First, PM is not solely deconstructivism, it is also characterizes by extreme preoccupation with subjectivity and skepticism of descriptive fact. The speaker is asking about modern usage of PM which this typically alludes to. Further the deconstructivism in all the examples I listed are within the speaker's premises which I made pretty clear.\n\nIn order for someone to come to the conclusion there more than 2 genders, you first have to deconstruct what it means to be a man or woman to an obsurd degree.", "654" ], [ "It's r/Starcraft kiddo. No one, especially a troll like you could \"trigger me\" here. You're usually just as bad as NegativeAPM and you do this every time but i figured I'd give it a go. \n\nThe reason you turned this conversation into a cesspit of wasted time was made up. You made up some garbage about GG'ing.\n\nAgain, reading skills are useful to have. Why are you bothering to post if you spout such utter drivel whenever you open your mouth? Genuine question.", "434" ], [ "The thing I don't quite get, and that the game doesn't really do a particularly good job of justifying is why 90% of these people are still in the building given the current situation. Like, why are generic engineers still hanging around in the engineering section with <PERSON> while an interdimensional demon thing and a force of mold spores are launching an all out invasion?\n\nWhy are <PERSON> and her cohorts of researchers just chilling in Executive? \n\nThere's a weird sense of a lack of urgency from anyone to do anything in particular and it's unsettling. \n\nWhy is no one particularly concerned with who or what the Board is? They just follow it's orders as if it was a sensible thing to do. \n\nWhy does everyone automatically recognize <PERSON> as the Director?\n\nAll these things are just weird. Narratively, sure they increase the weirdness of the game, which I suppose is what they're after, but I feel like any thinking about the game's story just raises more questions.", "20" ], [ "> I don't think that something being legal makes it justified and I hardly consider 18-year-olds adults capable of making sound decisions. I was only 18 three years ago and I have changed so drastically since then.\n\nI guarantee you, you have not. \n\n > To me, it's predatory when older men seek out girls that are fresh out of high school because we all know they're just trying to fuck the youngest tail they legally can, and if the age of consent were lowered to 13 like it is in some countries, they would still have no scruples about pursuing a relationship (sexual or not) with someone that young.\n\nSo? This is a statement, not necessarily an supporting argument. \n\n > I don't think it's possible for a 30+ year old and an 18 y/o to have a healthy relatonship--there will ALWAYS be that power dynamic that exists between the age gap\n\nAge gaps don't have anything to do with power dynamics. This is a weird myth the feminist movement invented. \n\nIn any event, if it's legal, what two consenting people do is of no concern to anyone else. You can not like it, or call it predatory, but my response would remain \"so?\".", "70" ], [ "Whilst I am a social conservative and believe modern hookup culture has broken western society in various ways, the world you're talking about comes off as purely puritanical and at that point, you might as well throw the whole thing out and just adopt eastern arranged marriages. The amount of time investment on behalf of both the participating \"lovers\" and the chaperones required, as well as the dysfunction of how weak the \"lovers\" social skills will be in dealing with members of the opposite sex makes courtship essentially obsolete.\n\nIt would also never work because things like Tinder already exist that make behaving like that impractical.", "584" ], [ "> I said the two dating should talk and get to know each other. How is talking to each other making their social skills weak?\n\nBecause you're talking about a world where a single romantic encounter can require up to, I'm assuming a year of personal investment before sex is achieved, which is simply unsustainable, which is why society stopped doing it. We had this already in the Victorian era, and it was mostly only done the rich and amongst the people that did it, they still hook-up'ed on the side out of the public eye, or relieved their sexual tensions with brothels. The people who use this model now are nice-guys who dont' have any other option because women don't want them. \n\nIt would create individuals with weak social skills for a number of complex reasons, one of which being male sexual success is dependent on trial and error and your model doesn't allow that. Which is also why it's unrealistic and unsustainable so it kinda comes full circle when you factor in that the world is not like the Victorian era anymore where they didn't have this problem because people weren't plugged into their phones all day and had to socialize 24/7. \n\n\n > Where did the whole arrange marriage thing come from.\n\nI explained it pretty clearly. Your suggestions are puritanical. It makes more sense to achieve what you are trying to achieve by simply replacing it with an eastern system which produces happier, longer lasting marriages.\n\n > I never said anything about the parents being involved, instead I said the opposite. In fact I said NOT in the <PERSON> way, cause I think that's ridiculous. I said having chaperones is unrealistic. Go back and read what I wrote again.\n\nIf your only criticism is that I was mistaken in whether or not chaperones were involved, then re-reading is not necessary. \n\nIf all you're saying is you want that model to supercede the model we currently have, then that's fine. In fact, I agree with the sentiment. I'm saying it's not going to work for a number of reasons if you're saying you want to remodel the world this way.", "429" ], [ "> What does a research scientist do when their labs are vulnerable to Hiss attack at literally any moment, and there are only a handful of combatants available to protect them?\n\nFreak the fuck out. \n\n > What does a research scientist do when their labs are vulnerable to Hiss attack at literally any moment, and there are only a handfull of combatants available to protect them? And do you expect the reactor engineers to just abandon their duties and allow the reactor to blow? Or the Panopticon guards to just stop monitoring the cells? And then most of your fighters are Hiss, what can be done to push them back?\n\nUnless the Bureau only employs the most stalwart, collectivist, and hero engineers willing to sacrifice their life on a daily basis to defend a building that can move itself from horrifying infections resonant forces that assimilate people, absolutely. \n\nEven if your argument is \"everyone is super brave because the bureau would naturally screen out cowards for hiring process\", which I'd actually kind of accept, there should still be some element of fear. No one is afraid. Which is weird. The entire situation is being treated as an inconvenience to almost every character <PERSON> encounters. Even the generic guards aren't scared. \n\n > As for why everyone acceprs her as the Director: she has the service weapon.\n\nThat's fair, though only 1 character asks how she got in in the first place.", "550" ], [ "No, laws are based on what is good and fair for society, as a collective, and which rules should be such as in the event they are broken, leave society weaker. Most laws of consent are determined by the age at which the local lawmakers believe sexual encounters will damage children by virtue of their lack of ability to take responsibility for the behavior via their brain development.\n\nI personally believe a 14yr old is perfectly capable of understanding the implications of having sex with a 30yr old. My local law disagrees. If I had a daughter, I would be strongly unimpressed by finding out she is having sex with a 30yr old man. \n\nAll 3 things have nothing to do with one another and should, to a reasonable person, be compartmentalized. \n\n > It's foolish to argue that laws and feelings should be completely separated.\n\nLaw and cultural mores being convergent are largely coincidence except in cases where laws exist purely on the basis of morality in the first place, like Abortion.", "70" ], [ "> Murder. Rape. Theft. These are all morally wrong, therefore illegal.\n\nMurder, rape and theft are illegal because they are unproductive for society and create danger for the people in your society, not because they are immoral. It is legal in many US states to kill people who try to hurt you first, or tresspass on your territory. ie. it is productive for society for people to be legally able to defend themselves and their property by lethal force. \n\n > Americans balk at the idea of slaughtering and eating a dog. Indians balk at the idea of eating cows. Different culture, different morals, but slaughtering a dog or cow for dinner isn't really much of a big difference...is it?\n\nThat's a different topic, but not actually much different. It is illegal in America to kill dogs for food for a number of logistical reasons, one of which being dogs are not recognized in America as a food source. Therefore, dogs are protected under animal laws. Some countries do not believe it valuable to protect any animals at all. Some countries protect cows. Some countries allow the eating of dogs. These laws are not always moral. \n\n > May I ask why you would be against your young daughter sleeping with an older man if you believe a person of her age is capable of giving consent?\n\n200yrs ago I could beat you with a tire-iron, tell a judge you were a dumb broad who had it coming and they'd be like \"yea, that sounds reasonable\". I could probably get away with that 100 years ago even. Just because something is legal doesn't make it ok. I do not think it is a good idea to allow a 30yr old dude to fuck my 14yr old, whether I think 14yr olds can generally handle it or not.", "733" ], [ "I think I'm being misunderstood. My initial response was that the feelings of people that it's gross is irrelevant. Lots of people think weed is a dangerous gateway drug that should remain illegal. I'd say the same thing to them; so?\n\nMy feelings that I wouldn't want my daughter fucking a 30yr old personally are my own. If I found out someone I know was fucking a 14yr old, I'd consider it weird given such a huge age gap, but I wouldn't get out my pitch-fork and lynch them.\n\nI knew a man who was 35 dating a 17yr old. I didn't think anything of it other than that she cheated on him with one of his friends and was incredibly immature about various aspects of the relationship which I thought came with the territory.", "70" ], [ "Bring back Metalopolis, Daybreak, Antiga Shipyard, and Lost Temple where you can spawn in 3 and 6 oclock. Map pool 1337 status.\n\nThe problem with the current map pool is that they are all gimmicky, overly-busy macro maps which is terrible given the current ecosystem. \n\nI also think that giant macro maps aren't particularly desirable now that the game has been so sped up with changes to mining mechanics and gamespeed. If you want to slow the game down in a more interesting way, something like island maps or maps that have components of it that are seperated like Lost Temple had would probably be a more interesting way to go.", "829" ], [ "Most FPS issues are because people's AA is set too high. XP has a strange bug where AA heavily affects some planes that have electronic flight bags. \n\nThat being said, as the Zibo becomes more complex, it's FPS will drop. That's the nature of flightsim. I used to get like 50 fps in the Zibo, now I get 35. \n\nAs for the bugs, that's kinda Zibo. IMO, they put out updates much too quickly for the -800. I can have version 10 installed and Ill come back tomorrow and it's already on version 14. They just put out the 737-900ER update and when I went into simbrief, I realized all of it's weights were wrong, and left-over from the -800. I'm like \"you guys didn't bother to fix this in the almost 2 quarters since the last one came out? For realz?\"", "784" ], [ "I can't think of a single line, but I always found <PERSON> had the most real and usable dialogue, that applies in real life. \n\nFor most of the show, <PERSON>'s expertise are inferred. But, there's a scene in S5 I believe where they have to teach <PERSON> how to be an account man. <PERSON> gives him a crash course and explains everything you require to connect (or in this case, manipulate) someone is usually given to you by them if you just frame the conversation properly. As a dorky loser kid growing up who had to actually learn how to connect to people on purpose, I was immediately struck by the accuracy.", "311" ], [ "Im aware of the concept behind the testbed setup. The team uses the -800 as the playtoy. I still feel many of the bugs could be just as easily diagnosed by <PERSON> himself before publishing. \n\nNo one's saying they dislike frequent updates, but do we really need 1-4 updates PER DAY on some occasions? Not in my opinion.\n\nBut sure, if I really cared, I could stay on legacy versions.", "586" ], [ "\"Not addressing your criticism\" has more to do with the obfuscating manner in which you speak. I don't particularly know what you're attempting to communicate other than to implement a \"nay-say\" debate strategy. \n\nSo far, you've just asked me to \"prove a framework\" and when I provided a number of studies each proving an aspect of the \"framework\" I believe, you told me none of them count, which you were obviously going to do anyways, lol. The only other actual claim you seem to have made is that you think it's indeterminant whether a randomly selected group of women would have greater attraction to a tall, dark, physically fit man over a short, fat, jobless man if he's charming enough, which is an unfalsifiable claim because any evidence presented you can pretend \"well they just didn't meet the threshold of charming enough, <PERSON>\". I think any reasonable person would conclude your position is obviously poorly reasoned because anyone who leaves their house on a regular basis and knows a decent number of other humans can verify physically fit people are more desirable than fat people by a factor of, like, 10. Further, any actual research into human attraction can yield studies clearly demonstrating being fat, and/or bald, and/or jobless are huge motivators for unattraction.\n\nIf you have a question, or criticism I have not addressed, if you state it CLEARLY, I may be able to address it. Otherwise, it seems clear to me you're not arguing in particularly good-faith here and I really just don't have the mental bandwidth for it.", "378" ], [ "It is confusing because it has nothing to do with their \"public\" life. They just go way back, and while the full nature of their relationship has not really been diclosed, they strongly dislike each other in their private lives, but <PERSON> regularly talks to <PERSON> in DMs for some reason. \n\n<PERSON> tried to blackmail her to make her go away in his private life. The only reason she's relevant is because this and the <PERSON> drama happened at the same time and <PERSON> is under the impression, being friends with <PERSON> that Destiny was trying to orchestrate a \"cancel\" by using <PERSON>'s personal information.", "494" ], [ "These types of questions are answered by looking up any media meant to appeal to men. 30sec on pornhub pretty much answers all questions regarding mass male sexual appetites, including clothing. \n\nIf not, go check out nsfw subreddits.\n\nAsking people is just going to give you a bunch of disjointed personal opinions like the vocal minority who claim not to like fake boobs.", "506" ], [ "No because i prefer conventional relationships. Their relationship is super non-conventional. \n\nEither way, everyone knows who destiny is and what he's about. Further more <PERSON> is like, what 22? \n\nYou cannot approach this situation as if it's cut and dry. You're right that it seems like Destiny cant really offer her what she needs but she's getting what she needs from other people. She is making the choice ro stay with <PERSON>.\n\nIs it a bad idea to vent..? Not really. Regardless of <PERSON> and destiny's relationship, <PERSON> was in an intimate relationship with <PERSON>. The entire point of that is to vent. Talk is always talk until its not. \n\nThe reason this came to a head is because <PERSON> tried to throw his relationship with <PERSON> under the boss in the hopes of upgrading to <PERSON> because he liked her more.", "494" ], [ "Couple things. \n\nFirst, your position doesnt seem Popperian. <PERSON> was against inductive reasoning. He didnt, to my knowledge suggest that 1 example proves a rule. He believed it was more sensible to establish world views by lining them up and measuring falsifiability rather than induction. The degree to which a given claim is falsifiable im sure would have mattered to him though i have not read his work. \n\nI very much doubt he'd claim his mantra could be equally applied to the disproving of general rules as the goal of a general rule is state claims while accounting for deviations in the strength of the claim without having to explicitly say so. \n\n\"Most ikea furniture is white or black\" is a general rule because white and black are the two most popular colours. The fact that i own 2 ikea tables in walnut and beech doesnt disprove that claim. \n\n > And the studies of attraction you shared work more or less like tinder does. Check pictures, hypotetical scenarios, and make a decision based on very limited information.\n\nI would in actual fact agree with you that studies on human attraction are junk because they rely on self-reporting which is anti-science. However you demanded studies knowing theyd be inconclusive either way given your worldview and knowing that studies on this particular topic are poor sources of objectivity, which means you acted in very bad faith. \n\n > I have failed to find studies that meassure social skills in these contexts. And meassuring social skills by sexual success is of course a self confirming hipothesis, which isn't good science.\n\nIf i was steel-man your world view for you, your internal goal then whether it be in this conversation or in life in general as this speaks to your worldview itself, is to determine the degree to which you genuinely believe the average unattractive person can overcome the degree to which they are unattractive purely with generally achievable personality traits. \n\nI would put forward to you that it is a general rule that this is extremely unlikely unless they work themselves into highly valued socio-economic positions and leverage their power like <PERSON> did. \n\nI too have known extraordinary people who has disproportionately impressive effect on the attraction received from the opposite sex by being extraordinary in some way, but these people were extraordinary and their results cannot be easily replicated.", "76" ], [ "<PERSON> said the exact same thing...You should be taking this up with him. \n\nThat being said, I'm not familiar with this person, I have no idea how they identify and as a social conservative I am not particularly interested in taking part in their personal quest to obfuscate their identity. \n\nI know some trans people who are cool, and I respect them because they respect me, but they were also a total asshole in their behavior demonstrated on-stream so I doubly don't care.", "847" ], [ "> The state of the world is that people only do things they feel like doing: things they’re comfortable with. If this is what DSK wants women to do, then he would actually just be saying absolutely nothing should change. Clearly, then, you’ve misinterpreted his argument uncharitably.\n\nHas nothing to do with being uncharitable. It's possible I simply misunderstand his argument, though I don't believe I do. \n\nI believe you have misunderstood the point here. \n\nIf DSK and DM are agreeing on a descriptive claim, and his prescription to women as a class, or women as an individual, it really doesn't matter which, that if they view negative interactions with from men as a problem, they should take it upon themselves to generate positive interactions with men in their daily life (like going out of their comfort zone to give men trivial compliments), those women aren't going to go find their local incel to compliment his anime hoodie.\n\nRelatively well-adjusted women generally associate with somewhat more relatively well-adjusted men. However, well-adjusted men don't need the positive interactions DSK is discussing because the negative and harassing behavior causing these problems for women aren't well-adjusted men.", "971" ], [ "My understanding in regards to the fear discussion was simply that DM was obfuscating any female responsibility to work together to fix the problem by simply claiming women can't meet men half way because men are dangerous. DSK was IINM suggesting that men aren't dangerous as a class therefore that argument was nonsensical. \n\nIt is possible I've misunderstood and <PERSON> was suggesting this be a last prescription as opposed to a first prescription, but I think either way it's a relatively odd argument that I don't think would work either way.", "181" ], [ "> We must run in verrrrry different circles, mate.\n\nI don't think it's about circles. I think it's just how humans work. <PERSON> wrote a really good book about the neuropsychology of people and opinions. Almost no one changes their opinion live on anything. What a debate or argument is *really* about is gathering information and contentions to your own opinions, and using that information to improve your beliefs when you have time to process it in private. \n\nFew people take the time to do this. \n\n > This is where <PERSON> is more wrong because there is historical evidence (e.g. from artwork) that the female body types men are attracted to have varied across time and region, which supports <PERSON>'s position that body type attraction is more cultural than biological/hard-wired.\n\nNot to go full autism mode, but I actually went to artschool for some time and this more-or-less laymen take on the shifting of female body types due to culture is mostly an ad-hoc misnomer. Portrayal of women really only shifted through the baroque through to the renaissance in western art where women were portrayed as being rather chubbs, likely because the artwork was commissioned by rich western institutions and people wanted their portrayal of women to match to match their idea of women as fair. Probably because rich, western women in that period didn't do anything and were probably carrying extra weight. If you look at art work from Egypt, or Greece they did not portray women like this generally. Statues of <PERSON>, and other female icons from Greece portray them as ranging from athletic and muscled to relatively average. The Romans didn't portray women this way either. \n\nThank you for coming to my TED talk. \n\n > [the rest of the conversation]\n\nI dunno I just think we read the conversation differently. \n\nI think I have a pretty good idea what <PERSON> was trying to imply with his positions. Whilst you may be correct that he didn't n-e-c-e-s-s-a-r-i-l-y make certain claims, I think if I asked him point blank he wouldn't disagree with my interpretation of his worldview. Otherwise, there is no value to the claims at all. If all you're saying is AB is not scientific, but you have nothing to say on the effectiveness of operating in the world as if it is, especially for purposes of men seeking self help in attracting women, that's an absolutely valueless descriptive claim that wouldn't convince anyone on the other side to modify their behavior or relate to the topic in a fundamentally different way.\n\nWhat I will concede is the conversation is more amiable than I initially remembered. I think there's another topic they disagree on and I may have confused them as <PERSON> does like 3.5hr podcasts.", "177" ], [ "> Now I could be wrong because I haven’t followed every 6 hour stream about this drama, but is there clear evidence that that was <PERSON>’s motive? Is it not possible that he was hearing some pretty serious stuff from <PERSON> about destiny being abusive and he himself wanted to vent to someone about it?\n\nWell you can't prove motive. You can only prove the probability of motive. <PERSON> has said he had a crush on <PERSON>, and the logs and information made available if you happened to follow this saga (lol) do indicate that <PERSON> wanted to sexually impress <PERSON> by offering <PERSON> as a sacrificial lamb as he had already had sex with her multiple times and probably figured she wouldn't leave Destiny. \n\n > And just because their relationship is not conventional doesn’t mean they don’t need to have any boundaries. Lots of open relationships still have rules and boundaries. It sounds like destiny doesn’t care if <PERSON> has a problem with the girls he fucks and so that goes both ways, but I wonder if that’s working out super well for either of them. Maybe they need to discuss what they both want from the relationship. Are they partners or just close friends that have sex?\n\nWhat I'm saying is, you marry <PERSON>, you know he's <PERSON>. You are not going to have a normal relationship with an infamous serial killer.\n\n<PERSON> is a legitimate psychopath. Not like he's crazy, but it's pretty obvious he has actual, serious psychopathy. Everyone knows this. He says this himself. He did a Doctor.K talk about it. <PERSON> knows this and is volunteering to deal with it.", "494" ], [ "> First being that I cannot get the FMC button lights to turn on. I turned on all of the lights that I know of but is there a way to turn them on so I know what I am typing? I tried restarting the game with the engines running but that did not turn on the FMC lights\n\nKnobs behind the yolk\n\n > Second, the games is acting really slow now. I know that the Zibo mod has a lot of add-ons so it is expect but is there any settings I can adjust to make the game run faster now? I tried turning some of the graphics down but when the game reloaded it wasn't responding so I had to restart it. Is there any hardware I can buy to make it run smoother? I am currently running this computer:\n\nThe tablet has an issue where of you have high levels of AA enabled it'll look FPS. Other than that, I don't know. \n\n > Finally, when I first opened up the game I set all of my visual positions but when the game crashed I had to reset the positions again. Do I have to do this every time with the mod or is it just because I had to force quit the game due to it not responding?\n\nAll games forget adjusted settings if they crash and don't write to file instead of being closed properly. \n\nIt sounds like your machine is unstable.", "784" ], [ "Being gay was so socially unacceptable no one considers it. \n\nThis happens in countries that still view it as unacceptable to be gay. A white guy I follow lives in Korea and he once said it's so unacceptable to be gay that straight guys can behave in stereotypically gay fashion and no one thinks it's \"gay\" because you'd be so harshly outcast so it musnt be real gayness.", "418" ], [ "There are multiple streams of thought to this. Some people believe at GM/pro level, balance doesn't matter at all because you're so good you are now playing the player, not his units. \n\nOther people believe balance only STARTS at GM, and doesn't matter at any other point. \n\nRealistically, a unit that's imbalanced at gold should still be imbalanced at GM most of the time because opponents are equal. Yes, you can micro better, but I can execute equally better...but I think it is true that some people can give advice or lay expectations on low leaguers that are unreasonable. Especially when it comes to balance. Calling something balanced because GM players can handle it is not a reasonable argument (RE: perma cloaked widow mines). \n\nLikewise I also see a lot of people suggesting things aren't imbalanced or are balanced because your opponent can just do X, but X is not something a gold leaguer can do. ie. the skill required to beat a strat is higher than the skill require to execute it. \n\nThis goes around and around. Ultimately, take anything with a grain of salt and rely on critical thinking skills. Lots of people use pro players as evidence of imbalance, yet know full-well their opponent in diamond 3 is not <PERSON>...\n\nBeing GM doesn't inherently mean anything other than you're really good at the fundamentals. I see GM's on this forum talk absolute horseshit all the time.", "197" ], [ "Yea, as a typically diamond player who sent myself back to bronze to relearn the game when I came back, I noticed that just macro'ing to fuck would actually lose pretty often to silvers and golds. The thing keeping them in silver in gold is more often horrible executions and horrible decision making, like forcing base trades when all they have is mutas and I have +2 shields, very late all-ins, bad cheese, etc.", "532" ], [ "Any player can be the better player on any given day. It's entirely possible and probably that a number of Protoss players happened to be in good form during their RO8 qualifiers. Likewise, it's entirely possible that everyone who was playing a race other than Protoss who made it to the round of 8 was *not* playing well. There is no statistically relevant ...relevance to 6 players being of 1 race. \n\nOne can just as easily say the only *reasonable* reason for Terran always winning GSL is because Terran is overperforming. 7 times in a row is a lot of times in a row to win a best of 7. That's the better part of 49 wins against their colleagues. \n\nOr I should say, there are a large number of possible reasons and there's no evidence other than hear-say claiming it's related to balance. Blizzard themselves said by the numbers Protoss is actually *not* the top race...", "197" ], [ "> I'm directly arguing the point you made and I'm not attacking your character so you are misusing the word adhom... \n\nNo I'm not... \n\n1.\n(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.\n\nYou stated if my play deviates from your opinion, my play is poor and I don't know what I'm doing, which is neither a good argument, nor do you have the seniority, skill, or game knowledge to claim. \n\n > Why do you think Terran are forced to stay in their base early game?\n\nThat's not a premise I agree to in the first place. Terrans have a number of cheeses, all-ins, and early game pushes that can be effective if executed well, just like anyone else. Terran players may not *want* to push early for a number of reasons. In PvT, typically whoever is expanding slower is required to become the attacker.", "508" ], [ "> You're basically making an argument that <PERSON> winning a lot = > Terran winning a lot, which is completely different from a bunch of Protosses dominating Korea.\n\nYoure making the argument that it's ok for <PERSON> or <PERSON> to dominate for 7 seasons and it means nothing because they're <PERSON> and <PERSON> then it's logically consistent to say the selection of Protoss players who made it to RO8 were simply superior at that given tournament to their counterparts. \n\n\n > Definitely the race that has the most GM players, were did they say Protoss was not the top race?\n\nStatistically irrelevant. \n\nDid you read the community update?", "385" ], [ "You're making an argument that ultimately results in a game that doesn't function unless robots play. \n\nChess is balanced. Each player gets the same pieces except one player gets to go first. Regardless of colour, robots are infinitely better than people. Only a few people can beat chess robots. Chess is balanced whether robots play or children. \n\nYet the game was designed by people a lot worse than the chess robot. \n\nBalance for a gold leaguer and balance for a GSL RO8 players is just different. It doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Yet there are lots of things Blizzard could do to balance the game further at the GSL level that would break the fun, or be overly punishing at gold.\n\nIf Blizzard decreased the price of the zealot to $25 you can't say that doesn't matter in gold.", "197" ], [ "Fair enough. You beat me at an argument about chess. I concede. Put it on your resume. \n\nNow, refocusing on Starcraft. Your depiction of my argument is an argumentum ad absurdum, and a straw man. No one said Blizzard ought to balance the game around scrubs. I said there is a degree by which balance matters to a gold leaguer, that cannot be denied.\n\nIf Blizzard decreased the cost of the zealot 75%, would gold league Protoss players win more often, or less often?", "508" ], [ "> There's a huge difference between 1 player dominating, and the other players of his race not doing as well, to a lot of players of 1 race doing well...\n\nThere isn't statistically. \n\nEverytime you add a qualifier, you add an entire spectrum of possibilities that require evidence to maintain your claim...\n\nIn a given hypothetical tournament, there are 3 terrans, 5 zergs, 5 protoss. A terran won. All 5 zergs lost round 1. \n\nWhy are there only 3 terrans?\n\nWhy did all zergs lose?\n\nWhy did a terran win?\n\nBecause imbalance doesn't satisfy any of these questions in the slightest. \n\nLet's take one your arguments. Let's say the Terran was <PERSON>. \"Well <PERSON> is a starcraft god, so it makes sense that he wins all the tournaments, but protoss is still op\". Ok, but <PERSON> got ROFLstomped in SuperTournament round 1. Ok, now we have definitive proof that even <PERSON> can simply play badly and be off his game. <PERSON> is also known for making it to RO8+ and choking. This throws a huge wrench in your argument because your argument is using the improbability of multiple players doing well/badly at the same time as a crutch. \n\nOk, so let's take that crutch and ad even more questions to our hypothetical tournament:\n\nHow many players play each race?\n\nIf one race has more players, why do more players play that race?\n\nHow many players who are good enough to play in GSL play that race?\n\nHow good are those players vs their colleagues? \n\nHow do we know it's not a coincidence that multiple players of 1 race can be doing well at the same time? \n\nOk, so maybe Protoss simply has more really good players than Terran has, so when <PERSON> does badly, there's less obstacles for those Protoss players and balance has nothing to do with it.", "197" ], [ "If you're new to this, buying standalone PCBs probably isn't a good choice. It'd be better to buy a board with a number of different types of PCB. \n\nFor example the KBDfans stuff usually come with multiple options. \n\nThe Bella which is a 75% and is on open groupbuy this month is basically perfect for beginners as it offers every option you'd want except no (as of now) interchangable plate. It only comes in brass.", "144" ], [ "People seem to be making up kind of convoluted logic as to how this works... \n\nIt seemed obvious to me from the graphics on screen that the show was simply trying to communicate that <PERSON>'s eye lasers are much stronger than <PERSON>'s. \n\nHis lasers are strong and explosive like <PERSON> from X-Men. Homelander's seem more like knives. \n\nTo be honest I feel the show basically threw out logic for the benefit of the audience getting to jerk off over stormfront's \"death\". It didn't make any sense that the show clearly demonstrated her extreme toughness (the laser my tits sex scene) but then have a human able to stab out her eye with a regular knife??\n\nThey needed a circular saw to make a cut in Starlight...", "196" ], [ "I dropped the show because it was funny and was entirely related with your meme...I have no idea what you're talking about. I wasnt aware you were so offended by pop culture references. \n\nI'm not invested, I mostly kept talking because I wanted to see where you were taking this. You're the one who appears to be genuinely angry about this. \n\nI'm compelled to believe you thought my reference that you didn't understand was an insult to you which would explain your extremely weird, mean spirited behavior but your subsequent replies suggest that's not the case...", "248" ], [ "> .....What? CPUs aren't in price categories, they're in performance categories. They're both 8/16, HT/SMT enabled CPUs - hence the comparison\n\nThis is a weird semantical argument that makes no sense. Of course CPUs are in price categories. Price correlates to performance. Intel doesn't put out an i9 at $250 for a reason; their i9 product line is for \"price is no barrier\" consumers who want the best and are willing to pay 5-600+ bucks for it. \n\nIf you don't think Intel or AMD puts serious thought into the pricing segments of their product and how they can justify a price tag at every threshold in their lineups you are le wrong. \n\nEven if you were right, competition creates the price category anyways because capitalism. \n\nYour best argument here is that performance predicates price which is just playing a chicken /egg game. \n\n > Nonetheless, the difference is there, but I wouldn't call it significant considering it's only really even noteworthy at & lt;1080P. It's a difference, but not a difference worthy of a $150USD price jump, which is my concern.\n\nThat depends on what you're doing. If we talking generic gaming, then yes I'd say if you bought a 9900K for gaming, you're probably a dumb dumb. However a lot of people did do that despite the steep price uptick because of the mantra surrounding Intel and \"best fps, no compromises\". \n\nI think your argument is playing too hard on what should matter instead of what does matter. Getting 150 fps on your 3700X vs 165fps on your 9900K probably shouldn't be worth the price difference but it is to large numbers of people. \n\nHeading over to techspot, my preferred review venue for pragmatic takes on tech, the holistic difference between a stock 9900K a 3700X is about 10 frames. \n\nIf you head over to gamers nexus which I'd consider a more often than not Intel bias establishment they did their review of zen2 against well overclocked 9900ks and the frame rate difference in games that were not heavily GPU bound was quite palpable. Like 30 frame differences.", "153" ], [ "A year is a negligible timeframe. \n\nIt agrees with certain aspects of your argument, it does not agree with you holistically which is what I wrote. \n\nYou providing a news article makes your argument weaker and I'm unsure why youd do that. If you think the fact checker agrees with you, you should have linked that instead. It was an easy Google search.\n\nIt seems like you're doing the smug lefty thing of post hoc rationalizing your argument and attempting to avoid conversations about your premises.", "809" ], [ "Not entirely relevant to you now but in the future \"cold turkey\" telling a woman you like her is more likely to kill attraction that help it. \n\nPutting women in a position to make an immediate value judgement is the least effect courtship strategy one could possibly imagine. Being mean to her is actually probably a better strategy than confessing your undying love. \n\nGuys really gotta stop doing this. Show women you like them. Don't put them in the spot by telling them. Unless she secretly loves you back it won't accomplish anything and it'll make you romantically tepid/non-challenging to her.", "289" ], [ "> Strange thing to say in the comment thread about a national news article that literally explores Aboriginal languages, but go off.\n\nA news article being written to cater to a certain group of individuals doesn't constitute a cultural spotlight being shown on a topic. \n\n > A necessary part of any discussion about colonialism is the people who were colonized, especially when they themselves are speaking. Sorry about your white fragility\n\nI'm not white. \n\nDefeating rascism and minority issues is really hard if you yourself are racist. Pro life tip for you.", "987" ], [ "As far as I'm aware, you are in fact born gay but gay people don't like this because it suggests that their personhood (which is oftened defined by their gayness) is simply a biological defect or deviance. \n\nI also think a lot of the scientific field is scared to fund studies or put out headlines that it is genetical and therefore could theoretically be possible to turn off being gay. \n\nI think being gay must be genetic if you're born gay. I'm open to the idea it's just people not liking the sex they're biologically supposed to be wired to. I'm against transexuslity on the same grounds. But I do think being gay is not a choice.", "640" ], [ "No one needs to be reminded colonialism was a thing and the people that actually kinda do don't care. \n\nFacts tend to have a conservative bias actually but that's a different conversation entirely. \n\nIf you actually care about indigenous issues and you actually care about people that disagree with you eventually aggreeing with you (I don't think you do. I think you're just virtue signalling) then assuming I'm white and attacking white people is a really bad way to advocate for basically anything.", "987" ], [ "It really super isn't. For as much as lefties complain about <PERSON>'s incessant lying, you guys love to just *say* things just as much: It's not a direct invitation, that's not what a direct invitation is. it's a topical yet contextually irrelevant tangent at best. \n\nIt would have been a direct invitation had he said \"what is this dumb name for a city. They should have called themselves \"mini toronto'\". *Then* it invites a conversation about why Ottawa is named Ottawa and not something else...\n\nA fox news talking head mispronouncing but actually not mispronouncing a city's name doesn't invite anything except possible and fleeting criticism by people who already disliked him.", "622" ], [ "Not necessarily true. A banks primary role is to offer it's services. It accomplishes this through fees and interest rates. The only reason it doesn't need to have all the actual money people deposit is because we allow banks to invest it for their own ventures, usually irresponsibly... Like buying shitty mortgage bonds, and trying to repackage them for wildly inflated prices.", "499" ], [ "I don't agree with your contention. A penis and a vagina may have be made of the same biomatter, but they are distinct organs. The entire \"plumbing\" of your sex is an intricate and complicated set of biomechanics and it is incorrect to claim either sex is essentially the same as the other save for some different piping. Hands and feet are also essentially similar organs especially in apes and monkeys, but it would still be incorrect to consider them interchangeable. \n\nIntersex people are an extreme mutation/deviation even greater than the other LGBTBBQ categories so I don't think they really warrant consideration. Some people are born without eyeballs, that doesn't put into question our concept of humans being creatures capable of sight.", "654" ], [ "That's not what happened or at least, you're misunderstanding <PERSON>'s behavior...The conversation begins with <PERSON> denying any hierarchy at all, and that A/B is a complete myth. <PERSON> clearly expresses his incredulity at that claim with his voice and body language. Further, he expands that A/B simply refers to people at specific clusters on a spectrum. <PERSON> again further explains his position that humans have obvious biological wiring in terms of what people are attracted to (ie. he's saying attraction is not nebulous or entirely subjective) and there are packages of traits women will like more than others, the same way men have traditionally preferred certain female body types through history. <PERSON> is intellectually unprepared for the conversation because he's probably only surrounds himself with people who agree with him and shrinks away on multiple fronts to try to present a premise that's more agreeable to <PERSON> because that's how people usually behave when they think they're right and realize mid conversation they're not. They argue about this for most of the clip and at the end <PERSON> offers <PERSON> an olive-branch by clarifying his position that humans are capable of nuance; not all alphas are the same and not all betas are the same. What they agreed upon was that it was silly to make it a socio-political hill worth dying on. \n\nPeople don't seem to realize that in a productive conversation between two disagreeing worldviews, your goal shouldn't be to dunk on people. Taking his disinterest as a host to continue an ideological disagreement after a 15min conversation about it with a guest who obviously disagrees with him and won't be convinced, and is showing minor signs of anxiety, as submission rather than understanding how to conduct a conversation productively whilst not making his guest feel attacked is off the mark. When <PERSON> presents his original first premise, <PERSON> literally responds \"that doesn't make any sense to me\" and further clarifies he's had evolutionary biologists on the show who suggested <PERSON>'s premise is false.", "495" ], [ "Having spent most my day researching this when I actually endeavored not to get sea-lion'ed, I've found many of the sources are paywalled and concluded by someone else, so whilst I am only doing this to maintain my own intellectual honesty (I said something and should back those things up) I fully expect you'll try to pretend I provided nothing, and/or that the paraphrased conclusion cannot be trusted, but here ya go. \n\n > [*the article of the thread that proves my point*]\n\n- _URL_5_ \n\n > [*girls were more attracted to violent men for fucking. Not LTRs*]\n\n- _URL_3_\n\n > [*Biology and social heirarchy are somewhat linked*]\n\n- _URL_1_ \n\n > [*Women are way more attracted to men with high(er) status*]\n\n- _URL_7_ \n\n > [*Women are more attracted to men with high status. Men don't really care about women's status*]\n\n- _URL_0_ \n\n > [*women are more attracted to men who have extreme sport hobbies and take traditionally masculine risks*]\n\n- _URL_6_ \n\n > [*Women are more attracted to men with signs of violence for fucking*]\n\n- _URL_2_ \n\n > [*Women wanted to fuck muscley men, women would consider LTR with \"weak\" men.*]\n\n- _URL_4_", "256" ], [ "> This seems a bit reductivist, though. Are there only two positions in the social hierarchy, top and bottom?\n\nThat's like saying it's reductivist to make a distinction between a 1995 Honda Civic and a 2020 Lambo. Of course there are cars in the middle, there are lots of cars of differing price points, but to say there is nothing defining what a Lambo is and nothing defining what a Civic is nonsensical. \n\nThere are high priced cars that have bad designs. There are low priced cars that are build amazingly. This is irrelevant when discussing what defines a $500,000 exotic automobile vs a typical commuter car. \n\n > Are you saying that you disagree that \"alpha\" and \"beta\" (i.e. confidence/competence/fitness or lack thereof) are contextual, or specifically with the example they used (CEO thrown in foreign prison)?\n\nI was communicating that the researchers were just playing a semantics game. To disprove alpha/beta you have to disprove male sexual heirarchy because alpha/beta literally just means \"men women want\" vs \"men women don't want\". They haven't done that. They've just slightly redefined the concept of the words. For eg. their ultimate conclusion is that <PERSON> 3 is the most attractive version of \"<PERSON>\". All they did was add a few characteristics from <PERSON> 2 to <PERSON> 1. They haven't disproven than <PERSON> 2 was the least desirable. \n\nIf you want to disprove alpha/beta dichotomy, you have to prove that randomly selected women *could* want <PERSON> 2 over <PERSON> 1 OR 3. \n\n > I don't think anyone has disagreed with the idea that there is a connection between female attraction and social hierarchies. \n\nLOTS of people disagree with this. Lots of people in this thread are disagreeing with this.", "177" ], [ "> The speaker clearly struggles with how probability works. It was a statistically inaccurate, racist statement, and I can prove it with math.\n\nAgreed, weeds, but I'm not sure who's side you're trying to take here. If you're saying it was both racist, **and** statistically false, that's seems indefensible. No math could ever prove you right because it's an economic fact that black people are way more poor than white people as a class. The odds of randomly selecting a white person and having them be poor are far lower even if there are numerically more poor white people because there are also a fuck ton more *not* poor white people. Blacks only make up 13.4% of the US population. 20% of those blacks live under the poverty line. 7% of whites do. \n\n > Of course contemporary communities would move away from the wolf analogy, as it discredits their myth. I gave your statements little attention and moved on, because I assume you know who <PERSON> is.\n\nI do. My point was that the terms were never *actually* meant to reflect wolves. I know that because I was *in* these communities when this article was written. \n\n > Therefore, the “alpha-beta” dichotomy exists.\n\n > He is saying the nice things about mental health, and using the term “myth” as a pejorative.\n\n > I’m saying that there’s no evolutionary basis for the “alpha-beta” dichotomy as described in popular culture, but also making an argument about how this dichotomy conforms, point by point, to the definition of a myth.\n\n > Where I disavow the terms as “accurate descriptors of reality” is that they’re describing the relatively the same idea that feminism defines as the patriarchy. They acknowledge the same set of behaviors, but point to different origins. One points to biology, the other to socially mitigated factors. Which one is more likely to be the case in humans?\n\n > I would not say I fall into any camps, but if we’re picking, I’m straddling the Evolutionary Biology and Constructivism. Humans are conscious actors, not slaves to evolutionary biology.\n\nI cannot relate to anything you've said here. This seems almost like a post-modern approach to analyzing human behavior which I simply don't share as a first premise. I do not believe humans are complicated conscious actors; what you see is what you get. I would actually argue humans are basically bio-robots built of squishy goop instead of metal and bolts. X input almost always begets Y output and people very rarely have any kind of complex thought motivating their actions or behavior. \n\nI think if anything, we humans have proved that social conventions are pretty weak next to what we're presumably imprinted to do. The church has for centuries tried to convince people to stop fucking, stop divorcing, stop aborting, with threats of eternal hellfire even in ages when nearly everyone was a believer and still failed. I find it extremely unconvincing that who we want to have intimacy with, especially in an age of unprecedented loneliness, and especially in an age of proported \"sex positivity\" would still be constricted by any kind of social programming *against* certain kinds of sexual partners. \n\nI operate from the base premise that what we bio-robots, not particularly different than any other instinct-driven creature, except we have a nifty neo-cortex that can build airplanes and iPhones. That doesn't change our instincts, and I'd need evidence that that isn't the case. You seem to be operating from the opposite side, believing humans are independent actors and you'd want proof humans are being biologically driven to do things. I'm not sure how to bridge that impasse as it does feel like an impasse. \n\nEither way, I wanted to apologize. Even if I disagree with you, I was uncool. Thanks for coming back to the table. I respect that.", "177" ], [ "What I've realized, having a job where I'm in a good position to judge the economic status of the citizenry is Ottawa doesn't really have a middle class. \n\nYou're either really well off, or you're relatively poor. \n\nThose who are legitimately \"middle class\" and not *\"neuveau-riche cosplaying middle class\"* which is what most people in Ottawa and in this thread seem to think middle class is... are usually people who happened never to find a romantic partner and live alone, or found their way into a good paying profession without having went to university.", "954" ], [ "Whilst Twitter is a private company and can do whatever they want, to say he was banned for legitimate reasons isn't really accurate...\n\nThere are literal dictators still on Twitter and if Twitter actually cared about any of t his, they'd have banned <PERSON> when he was running for President 4 years ago and spreading the same misinformation. \n\nThey're only doing it now because he only has a week left of being president and they want the leftist brownie points.", "106" ], [ "Your surprisingly stark inability to understand the mindset of either the terrorists that stormed the capitol or the people who agree with them is not conducive in solving the divide that allowed these kinds of actions to occur in the first place. \n\nI'm literally flaberghasting that leftists (im going to assume you're a leftie) still after 4 years of <PERSON> haven't learned their lesson on this front...\n\n\"Hurr durr bad person! Give me virtue signal points pweeeze!\" is like a handbook to 'Civil Wars 101' lol.", "609" ], [ "No, politics would be *more* crazy because you'd have large portions of the population voting for subjects they don't understand, and candidates they don't really support. \n\nCompulsory voting is nightmare for a nation like the USA. I would imagine it only works in places like Australia because presumably Australia is a pretty moderate nation.\n\nI imagine the idea of compulsory voting is becoming popular in the USA now because the democrats are aware they have all the demographics who traditionally don't vote and feel mandatory voting is an avenue for forever-victory ie. they'll never lose an election again no matter what if EVERYONE had to vote because there aren't enough republicans to ever win a 51/49 vote over the whole country.", "845" ], [ "Ok. You seem like you might be a guy I need to ask a question. \n\nI see you're into both mice and the mechanical keyboard scene. You have what looks like a Singa deskmat (?) anyways, my question is...how kind of texture do the mechkeeb deskmats use?\n\nLike I'm using a GLIDE38 because I want a fast glide and I avoided ever buying a deskmat in the mechkeeb community because I assume they're super slow, dense weeves mostly just desired for the image to match the keycap set...\n\nWhat's your opinion?", "144" ], [ "> Thanks very much for taking the time to reply : )\n\n > Interesting, what changed in the last 2 weeks? The NEO mod?\n\nThe value of the Toliss package and addons are just too high. \n\n > It’s always the way isn’t it, no perfect aircraft. I’ve been really happy / impressed with the FF 320 up until now, but based on the Toliss being a clear winner, it seems like I may be picking that up as well ha.\n\nThe problem with the Toliss is that they clearly put most of their work into the systems and the modelling, whilst certainly ok is not as immersive. The MCDU is also horrible to use as they used XP10 SASL and it lags badly in XP11. \n\nThe FF A320 *feels* a lot better to sit in still.", "144" ], [ "> I think you may be reading into it with a biased interpretation, because you've provided me with a narrative not an analysis. \n\nI very much have not and did not. \n\n > You've asserted <PERSON> as \"intellectually unprepared\" for the discussion but don't provide any concrete reasons for thinking so.\n\nI very much did. I specifically said that he was intellectually unprepared by my argument that he shrunk away from his original premises on several occasions...he first asserts that alpha males don't exist at all, and no scientist will claim they do. Later, he posits that the challenges <PERSON> provides are hypotheticals, but that certainly the stereotypical scenario <PERSON> is providing as a demonstration of \"alpha\" is attractive to a lot of people but doesn't think it can be immediately reasoned back to our specific evolutionary belief of it. He then re-submits a new premise that ***really*** what he's arguing is the unscientific usage of the terms \"alpha and beta\" but agrees and even provides an example of how he agrees social hierarchies exist, but that they can be shifted in different scenarios.\n\nHe necessarily contradicted his original premise by agreeing to the message or at least part of it, his intellectual opponents are putting forth by using those terms. The *new* debate from his intellectual opponents would now be whether or not alphas are relatively permanent or dynamic ie. whether an attractive jock would still be at the top of the hierarchy in a DND campaign instead of the football field, which I'd argue he obviously would be, but <PERSON> disagrees. \n\nThe best and most charitable interpretation by me for this conversation would be that <PERSON> did not ask for clarification of his original premise and <PERSON> was of the opinion the entire time that there are cultural archetypes we can loosely term \"alpha/beta\", and so his position was never a shrink at all and simply that there's no scientific evidence of this being natural, however, he states in the conversation that when talking to women who say they want alphas, he considers that nonsense because they don't exist so that's unlikely. \n\n > <PERSON> does not push back on this, and there does not seem to be any evidence he disagrees (at least not in this episode).\n\nHe spends about 5-7min at the start disagreeing with <PERSON>. He only agrees at the end when <PERSON> softens his position to agreeing that not all alphas are the same and not all betas are the same. He ironically does not object to the re-asserting of the words to describe his meaning which should be noted. \n\nThey also agree that it shouldn't be political. \n\n > Mutual agreement is not \"submission\" by any stretch of the imagination,\n\nYes it is if the context matches. That's why sea-lion'ing exists. It is the cheapest, easiest way to force someone making a given claim to concede.\n\n > and no one \"dunked\" on anyone in this discussion\n\nCorrect. I'm getting the feeling you didn't understand my point, but either way it's not particularly important.", "414" ], [ "> Right but what I'm not understanding is the context this hierarchy occurs in. It should be inarguable that every individual woman who is interested men has an internal \"men I want\" and \"men I don't want\" list. But is this hierarchy you're referring to specific to each woman, or global/societal (or contextual)?\n\nGlobal. \n\n > I've seen lots of people disagreeing with you, but after scrolling through this thread I haven't encountered anyone who believes (or has at least not stated outright) that female sexual attraction is completely independent of social hierarchies.\n\nYou're kind of twisting the point in order to get a zinger in. Anyone who disagrees with alpha/beta is necessarily disagreeing with hierarchy based attraction because that's all it means. If they don't, they either don't understand the topic, or they have put little thought into their actual positions, which of course is extremely common. Or they're deliberately being uncharitable because it's trendy to proclaim your disbelief in \"alpha vs beta\" after it's became strongly linked to the redpill community.", "971" ], [ "You're quite literally pulling a \"demonmoma\". This is a total waste of time. We both know what youre doing. We both know youll pretend this means you won, make some snide comment and end the conversation. \n\nIf you are in any way interested in having a real conversation instead of being thirsty for a gotcha, you can keep to the other comment. Otherwise ill gladly be your transphobe :).", "248" ], [ "You have to go controls and there are private controls for payware planes that have special controls. FFs are called \"1-sim\" I think for some reason. AP disconnect should be in there somewhere. The AP disconnect button is different than turning the MCP off. \n\nFor <PERSON>' I don't know because I have the FF A320 instead but I'm sure hey have their own private category. For FF it's \"left stick takeover\". \n\nYou have to make independent profiles per plane.", "863" ], [ "Your question is kind of backwards. \n\nIt is entirely based on opportunity cost. If your opponent is smoking grey and he drives to the deck, is it worth it to sacrifice 3000m of altitude to go after 1 kill leaving you at the mercy of his friends who may have seen the engagement or are on comms with him? Not usually, no.\n\nIf you get lucky and damage a much better plane than the one you're in, is it worth it to keep the fight going as long as possible even though he's still combat capable? Probably not, no. It's probably better to run into the clouds and hope he bleeds out than to risk him getting the better of you.", "863" ], [ "Women want the those feelings from men they originally picked for their masculinity...\n\nWomen who picked <PERSON> from accounting aren't wanting for emotional connections. Quite frankly they probably get too much from men like that which is evidenced in like pretty much all the problems currently facing the masculinity crisis. \n\nNow because youve accused me of not knowing what women want which I think is kind of nonsensical, I think it's obvious that anyone who's actually looked into the topic would know that what people say the want has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on what they actually want and what decisions they make. If being a, let's just call it \"beta male\" was a successful mating strategy no one would out the effort into being the rigid alpha male archetype. I don't know if you've noticed but it's a lot of work and emotionally draining. They do it because it's what gets girls.\n\nWomen have no use for beta type men, especially now that the birth control pill is a thing and women make their own living. Literally every aspect of reality verifies this.", "971" ], [ "I get your point. I'm saying men are also a threat to men. In fact, men are 11x more threatening to other men than they are women because 92% of all violent crime is man on man, but that's not really something anyone cares about. I cannot resist The Rock anymore than you could resist me. In fact the difference in power between the rock and me is probably larger than between me and you. \n\nMen are in danger every day. I used to live on a street with a lot of bars. It's wasn't at all uncommon to be walking at night and for some guy who's had a bad night to wait for me to make eye contact and try to start a fight. \n\nAnyways my point is we just have different shit to deal with. The idea that women live in abject fear whilst men are skipping into the sunset only because we're stronger is a totally manufactured fallacy.", "256" ], [ "Because IMO copying an engine under licence doesn't make it all-American. \n\nI'm agreeing with the other poster that the engine is English. The plane made in the US and was primarily a US fighter, but it's engine is strictly British, and the development and QA was a joint allied endeavor. In fact it's original design was overseen and commissioned by the British but they eventually stopped needing it because they had the spitfire and typhoon.", "775" ], [ "Ok well, let's do that. Let's look at last season. \n\n<PERSON> was a prime alpha male. Sure. I agree. He was also going to win had he not said something incredibly stupid and tried to lie about it. \n\n<PERSON> isn't beta at all. He's mega hot, he's an athlete, and he's not afraid to use violence to defend \"his\" woman. He just happens to be a very reasonable person. Not being the cliche highschool bully doesn't make you the not an \"alpha male\". \n\nThe break-down of language and the fact that people don't understand these words or concepts is important. \n\nBut lets flip the conversation...let's pretend he was actually super beta for the sake of steel-manning your argument for you. <PERSON> was a huge player so the best argument we can take from that would be that a man's personality makes little difference so long as he's got biceps bigger than his head.\n\nIf you put <PERSON>'s personality in <PERSON>'s body, <PERSON> wouldn't be the sexual icon <PERSON> became (because <PERSON> was easily the least attractive man that season, and he is still pretty attractive).", "385" ], [ "Allowing a man to not pay child support is putting the rights of the father at equal footing to the rights of the child.\n\nIf you live in a free and fair society, the father,'s right to peace out cannot morally be held to a lower importance than the fact that this child was unfortunate enough to be born to an unprepared mother who made a bad life choice in keeping the child.", "843" ], [ "I'm not holding anyone anymore or less accountable. There are 3 people in the scenario and the choices of one affect the other two. The choice of the father to leave hurts the baby and the mom, the choice for the mom to keep the baby hurts the father and the baby, and the baby's existence hurts the father and the mother..\n\nIt is morally utilitarian to let the consequences of their choices fall where they may. I wouldn't want a father who doesn't want the kid to be forced to raise the kid because that's a shitty parent, and vice versa for the mom. If mom has the kid anyway even though she's financially unprepared and the kid doesn't have a reliable loving father, that was mom's bad choice, sorry kiddo.", "992" ], [ "> I'd have to believe men prey on women more than men. \n\nWhy is that a thing you have to believe?\n\n > Men are not completely safe, they are safer. Women really do not jog alone at night they way men do because it's more likely for them to be assaulted then men. It's also harder for a woman to escape in most cases\n\nIt isn't. Crime statistics demonstrate this. The difference is men aren't socialized to fear the possibility of confrontation. Women are.", "490" ] ]
297
[ 25493, 12034, 15509, 16152, 275, 694, 7738, 2134, 21782, 4568, 12941, 7701, 3917, 24832, 23945, 12482, 24364, 24407, 6335, 10299, 16533, 313, 2783, 22535, 3907, 10786, 4665, 14863, 2489, 1834, 9692, 23914, 15916, 18374, 8499, 18898, 1341, 13822, 11513, 13240, 2188, 16249, 13002, 24812, 3988, 23042, 10661, 8146, 13780, 13581, 5162, 1463, 4304, 15854, 4301, 1757, 9754, 8305, 1650, 13510, 12129, 18770, 9395, 13122, 6973, 13232, 8207, 3029, 16988, 20330, 24083, 13752, 2559, 8256, 594, 2989, 19377, 8514, 9593, 5708, 1308, 21064, 3512, 13777, 2691, 10432, 7778, 14179, 13551, 7593, 8542, 2329, 18042, 18248, 441, 1062, 14972, 21958, 25052, 18436, 21400, 15413, 10075, 21811, 1514, 9306, 19658, 8108, 15563, 22168, 1479, 20387, 23783, 266, 14316, 8646, 4848, 21054, 5040, 22034, 16569, 20460, 11496, 9885, 11431, 24481, 21183, 19342, 12937, 6466, 18442, 7493, 9092, 12800, 16524, 11758, 13363, 3009, 18864, 23805, 12755, 11066, 23029, 16990, 10497, 7895, 16979, 12913, 5661, 12382, 20146, 1971, 14235, 12361, 11554, 15885, 8590, 12093, 1531, 12888, 21112, 22736, 5378, 2137, 5261, 1633, 10470, 10813, 23408, 16344, 20898, 7284, 15060, 12196, 20280, 11413, 13285, 2145, 8865, 3625, 24948, 5471, 17493, 21496, 5369, 1207, 18274, 16681, 6975, 21332, 8742, 4584, 20833, 15483, 18160, 2796, 14150, 7022, 24708, 19223, 16034, 18197, 18272, 24942, 17584, 23117, 4547, 14319, 22983, 14161, 4971, 14177, 6272, 5804, 3568, 11688, 5644, 20258, 15477, 14455, 10688, 15423, 13321, 21522, 3316, 12591, 877, 7863, 4133, 3890, 18024, 1331, 6680, 13219, 12846, 10282, 5892, 680, 12820, 13987, 14663, 10232, 695, 14367, 9293, 17193, 7810, 11972, 1555, 17038, 12119, 11965, 9643, 8581, 21953, 20950, 6587, 7995, 21843, 1884, 18575, 11458, 2916, 10658, 23280, 10365, 12549, 19592, 23152, 20332, 23187, 3793, 8181, 8683, 5146, 12705, 17802, 681, 19113, 547, 19429, 9110, 6728, 1337, 12043, 11183, 1587, 12531, 17875, 9300, 5216, 917, 21667, 10110, 654, 20442, 13701, 8449, 7655, 20066, 24187, 7211, 11851, 17528, 18737, 9194, 6146, 18991, 4779, 4389, 22515, 19165, 13629, 25166, 24067, 14638, 7227, 24390, 24900, 23271, 5727, 5808, 6642, 23188, 14118, 2403, 5759, 22173, 696, 2129, 2453, 14279, 5290, 10806, 10612, 23293, 3786, 25126, 23085, 12374, 3792, 10980, 15757, 6824, 16085, 24763, 18230, 10957, 24513, 9913, 3075, 18234, 4735, 7002, 18704, 23054, 7248, 25232, 14672, 9526, 16936, 16862, 4824, 1704, 11753, 1967, 11996, 22296, 4454, 3, 3592, 7719, 12015, 14261, 10102, 20261, 7363, 23163, 19789, 22300, 13014, 21765, 3638, 6087, 22217, 17234, 20634, 10226, 2223, 2074, 22024, 1953, 22537, 24790, 19834, 4797, 23900, 17788, 3159, 15628, 11315, 23856, 21556, 21102, 9115, 2583, 11810, 2545, 11441, 10203, 18914, 4608, 4708, 22821, 7291, 21220, 8619, 12920, 9760, 3797, 1321, 5021, 15192, 24769, 8740, 4638, 2537, 1237, 8554, 21070, 13732, 11762, 10896, 13867, 5983, 1201, 5766, 11455, 22384, 16033, 11773, 18887, 9509, 2772, 9180, 22334, 24228, 13520, 4783, 6005, 128, 2918, 17668, 15135, 14800, 6841, 23028, 5390, 14887, 19322, 3510, 5835, 23928, 14896, 15186, 16, 4203, 9868, 6472, 2340, 24311, 17701, 18620, 9373, 18689, 21876, 11866, 22874, 15429, 2958, 13246, 1586, 18923, 7209, 25521, 13961, 9666, 10827, 8764, 148, 11991, 2224, 18679, 14513, 4171, 13868, 19425, 3840, 823 ]
reddit_dump_-Arhael-
[ [ "Ehm. <PERSON> -the player with the most win percentage plays HDR. He played with SPR for a bit then got back to HDR. Sniper rifles are viable a mid range too, just not as viable as SPR, however, it makes sniper rifles a lot more versatile. On top of that whenever you don't hit heads, you do more damage with sniper and thus down people faster. You have more zoom for more precision and you have next to no bullet fall off on HDR.\n\nAt the end of the day it's down to your playstyle. Marksman rifles and sniper rifles require you to play differently.", "694" ], [ "Shits at Kilo past 85 meters and in fact is the best long range AR, it has 876ms ttk compared to Kilo's 1038 and is just as laser accurate. Still competes Kilo at close and mid range, if you are able to land some headshots. Also, more rewarding for headshots, you only need 1 headshot to shorten ttk, while with Kilo - 2. Ammo shortage is mostly due to fire rate. At close/mid range you do need 1-2 extra bullets to kill, at long range, however, m13 does 1 more damage per bullet than Kilo.", "316" ], [ "They don't go off, if they land within 8 meters - the distance where you would have stunned yourself. On one hand you fail to stun at all, on the other - you don't get yourself fucked with self stun.\n\nKeep dropping in superstore. You face most sweaty opponents there and you learn a lot faster. You often get lots of people there and it's a very good survival exercise.\n\nAnd focus on movement above all, jump peaks and shit. Fear of dying makes you to slowdown and do walk peaks/squats, then enemy has easy target to shoot at. No matter how good your aim is, it's often like a lottery to win fight. With good movement you can avoid bullets and give yourself more time to kill enemy. It's a real mental struggle for me and I often fail to follow my own advice but when I do movement well, it's super rewarding. \n\nAnother thing I am trying to learn is to consistently ping enemies at close range. Aiming at red dot is a lot easier and it gives you temporary wallhack. Especially, when you have cover to abuse you can delete enemies as you can re-peak and shoot right at the target immediately.", "500" ], [ "Another thing about hdr is faster bullet velocity, makes it easier to hit your target. And having more zoom makes you more precise even at 70-100 meters. \n\nAlso, people underestimate value of damage per bullet. Whenever you deal with un-armored opponent, HDR oneshots into the body, while with MRs you still have to headshot. \n\nShooting people at long to extreme ranges is not useless. You can catch someone on rotation and downed enemy will have no cover to get revived. High ground positions often makes enemies more exposed, so they can't get out of sight after being downed as easily. Other times <PERSON> uses airstrike, he buys a lot of them throughout each game.\nEven if you fail to get kills, you starve enemy teams out of armor, so if they get close to you, they are in no shape to fight. Iron's general strategy is to take power position, snipe everything in the vicinity until everyone either dies or runs away. And if anyone still chooses to push, he gets alerted by claymores and then they have to somehow deal with amax+stuns. \n\nAlso, there are situations, where you are forced to deal with other snipers. Versatility of HDR will again help you a lot more than an MR. It's not uncommon, where you have to rotate through an open area but there are snipers 300-400 using you as target practice. You need HDR to have an answer to such situations. Marksman rifle doesn't help much unless you get very lucky with your shots.", "694" ], [ "Thing is the counter to it is movement and positioning. But vast majority of people play super passive making shotgun job extra easy. For example, if the guy head glitched at the top of stairs, shotgun guy would die or have unfavourable exchange. Otherwise you can wait shotgun to near your corner and then do wide jump peak and make enemy miss at least one shot almost consistently. R9's weakness is that it is very unforgivable, when you miss shots, unlike Origin/Jack, so capitalising on this weakness is the best you can do in cqc. \n\nAlso, riot shield can be used to find shotgun enemy and ping for your teammates. Then whole team can spam him with nades.\n\nBazookas give hell to shotgun users. \n\nFlashes are actually more viable than stuns against shotguns, if teammate already has stuns, grab flash. Shotgun users can pre-aim before being stunned but when they are completely blind, it is a lot less likely for them to hit anything.", "694" ], [ "Bots. \n\nHere is actual easy way to defeat them. \nInstead of mp5 build amax or ram7 like this:\n5mw, stippled, 45, optic/no stock, concussive underbarrel launcher. \n\nLauncher stun explodes on impact. When shields get close, it is hard to stun them without stunning yourself, with launcher you can still stun them easily, then get behind them and shoot away. Alternatively use incendiary launcher - straight upgrade to regular thermites and you get to carry up to 7 shots, so you can pick them apart 1 by 1.", "500" ], [ "It needs to land outside 8 meters. Stun radius is exactly 8 meters. It actually works in your favour too as you don't end up stunning yourself and dying as result. There is a skill ceiling to underbarrel launcher, they are by far the most op attachments ones you get skilled with them, youtubers are trash for dismissing them prematurely as they are outright more op in many situations compared to regular utility.\n\nAware of sleight of hands but normally either you have position where you can reload or you don't have time to reload at all. Other attachments are too important to me.", "613" ], [ "Ehm, no. Amax built for close range(with 5mw+stippled) competes mp5 at closest range and completely shits on SMGs outside 11-15 meters as well as other ARs and LMGs within 30-40 meters. Underbarrel stun in a lot of situations is just as good or more effective than regular stuns, being potent counter to shield users is just a cherry on top. \nIncendiary launcher can literally be used like a crossbow: peak a corner, stick to enemy and have an easy down.\nYou can also choose snapshot and easily check every building you approach. \nOr you can use smoke and having 7 shots you can get tonns of tactical value for the coordinated team.\nThe class is anything but shit.", "694" ], [ "Unless the player uses shield as a purely tactical tool. Leave a crevice between him and a cover for a teammate to safely beam enemies from behind. Enter buildings to safely reveal enemy locations including R9 users, and ping them to give info to the team, then switch to AR and deal with the situation accordingly. Be ahead of the team during rotation as he is a lot more likely to survive.\n\nStuns are an op tool in the game, every high level player uses them, so your point about them is moot. I could make identical argument about heartbeat sensor. Both need to be nerfed though. 1 second reduction for stun would be reasonable.", "500" ], [ "Is that supposed to be a high level player? He plays like he expects bots through abuse of ssbm. \n\nOpening doors, while standing right at front of them. \nAlso, jumping inside like that is good against SMG/AR users only, against R9 users it's a bad idea. He should have used jiggle peaks, which would allow to reveal shotgun user position without dying.", "22" ], [ "Exactly. Skilled riot shield guy beats juggernaut. On top of that you can use underbarrel launcher with Incendiary, which give you enough utility to deal with 2 juggs. Then there are airstrikes and all sorts of other ways to tactically beat juggernaut. Also, you can opt to hunt <PERSON> early in the game, where they are easy to deal with.", "183" ], [ "Yep, badly optimised game. Changing settings not affecting FPS is consistent with my experience. However, I never have frame drops to 12-20 like you, it's stable 59-60ish with my much weaker card and i5 processor. \n\nDo you have multiple monitors rig? One my friend has a driver issue, where his computer forgets which monitor is supposed to have full performance allocated. The only thing that helps is reinstalling drivers but every time he switches pc off and on, the issue comes back. So try temporarily plugging off all but main monitor and reinstalling drivers to confirm if that's the case.", "404" ], [ "They have plenty of weaknesses. In fact you can make a dedicated loadout to counter them. Even without special loadouts you can deal with them, if you are smart. Problem is that most people refuse to have a dedicated loadout in there selection and at the same time don't have skill to handle <PERSON> through smart play. But most important is that no one is brave enough to challenge <PERSON> mid game, where they are relatively easy to deal with, so they end up facing him in last circle, where often there is not enough sufficient cover. \n\nI do want them removed from loot and Easter eggs, so same people cannot abuse them but imho having a boss enemy every 4-5 games from random drop can be fun.", "345" ], [ "There are viable loadouts that counter <PERSON> and still amazing against regular player. \n\nStrela-P has super fast velocity and goes past trophy systems, really devastating in mid range in skilled hands. \n\nUnderbarrel launcher with incendiary counters jugger, riot shields and can be used like crossbow. \n\nRiot shield counters <PERSON> and single guy within coordinated team can bring tonns of tactical value. \n\nAt least one guy on the team keeping airstrike is a great <PERSON> counter. \n\nWhen you use LMGs or high calibre guns, you can destroy jugger vehicle and make them an easy target.\n\nOn killing <PERSON>, you can take minigun as secondary.", "456" ], [ "you can wal sideways exposing your elbow a few times back and forth, aka jjiggle. Enemy will see only part of your body for a fraction of second and may get provoked to shoot. Alternatively, run in into room tiny bit with sudden 180,\nIt is usually enough time for you to see enemy and not enough time for him to shoot at you but most of the time they do start shooting, which reveals their location and makes them feel uncomfortable. Alternatively, you can do short jump peak with immediate retreat, achieves the same effect. Bottom line you gather info with next to no risk of sudden death, in worse case you may lose a plate or two but you can run away and re-plate.", "500" ], [ "Everyone keeps saying about AMMO issues but it is hardly ever an issue, when you pair it with another AR. Up close you normally can loot your opponents for more AMMO. For distance stick to high calibre guns: AMAX/Oden/FAL/SA87/PKM to have more value per bullet. Munition boxes are not that uncommon. Also, in worst case you can beg a bit of ammo from your teammates.", "316" ], [ "Here is my advice. Tell your teammate to shut up and don't rely on comms. The only time comms are useful is when enemy is hard camping. Otherwise comms will get you killed more often than not. It's a lot more viable to just focus on the game than getting distracted by trying to process each teammate's sentence. Half the time you can find enemy by hearing footsteps or by throwing nades. Most of my fights I lost because of comms.", "500" ], [ "Hey, \n\n & #x200B;\n\nI like your idea about missed shots TTK. But your TTK calculations seem off. Also, amax is not 7 shots to kill, it is 6 shots to kill: 42\\*6=252. Same for M13, up close it is 11 short, at long range, however, m13 takes the same amount of shots as kilo: 14. \n\n & #x200B;\n\nHere is a good formula to calculate TTK: \n\n(60/fire rate) \\* (shots to kill - 1). \n\n6 shots AMAX: (60/630) \\* (6 - 1) = 0.4761904761904762 \\~ 476ms\n\n7 shots AMAX : (60/630) \\* (7 - 1) = 0.5714285714285714 \\~ 571ms.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nHere are general TTK calculations I made, feel free to use as reference:\n\n[_URL_0_](_URL_0_)", "316" ], [ "Lets see. \n\nAt close range Kilo has 35ms faster TTK or 5ms faster ttk, if you land headshots with both guns. At mid range Kilo has 77ms faster ttk (cos m13 has no mid range profile), however, m13 still wins by headshot ttk. \n\nAt long range Kilo TTK is 1038ms, while M13 - 876ms. So m13 ttk is 162ms faster at long range. \n\nOn top of that at all ranges Kilo needs 2 headshots to improve TTK, while M13 TTK shortens from single headshots.\n\nM13 is a straight upgrade to Kilo for highly skilled players because with headshots mixed in it complete Kilo at close/mid range and shits on it at long range.", "694" ], [ "Yes, they can help. Comms are good against passive camper enemies. Also, callout at beginning of the game is good, so you know which initial direction/ position enemy took but after that it is the best that you don't get distracted by comms, especially, when enemy is near. In split second enemy can change direction, which makes teammate give you next bit of info, which in turn can confuse the heck out of you.", "500" ], [ "You can label a gun \"best in the game\" best on low recoil and noob friendliness. Low recoil give you situational advantage but it doesn't make it more viable. Whenever you encounter M4/AMAX/RAM7 at mid range, you screwed, with same guns you can land literally every shot within 100 meters, so when you encounter such opponent, Kilo won't save you. Finally, in majority cases enemies have option to close distance to you to capitalize on their TTK advantage over Kilo. M13 in particular shits on Kilo by TTK at long range and is just as laser accurate. Bottom line there is no best gun in the game, each has pros and cons, the only thing Kilo has going for it is popularity.", "694" ], [ "Yeah, I started playing solos a few days ago. So good for improving individual performance, game sense and clutch mentality. I was too obsessed with team work lately and never realised how it actually hurt my performance and held me back.\n\n\nInstead of Val try this:\nAmax: 5mw, stippled, optic, 45/sleight/no stock, concussive underbarrel launcher. The most op SMG in the game, competes mp5 at closest range, shits on all SMGs outside 11 meters and underbarrel launcher is broken op ones you get good with it. Riot shields, especially, are free kd boost cos you can stun them fast even when they get close.", "122" ], [ "As ex R9 user I don't find the gun big problem. \n\n1. Push buildings methodically, jiggle peaks and baiting instead of brainless rushing. \n2. On finding shotgun enemy, out position him whenever possible. \n3. When I hold power position, don't hide like bitch, gather info and shoot enemies before they get close enough to pull shotgun. \n4. Have a teammate with riot shield, so he can counter shotguns. Teammate with bazooka is great too.\n5. Whenever possible abuse head glitches or other places, where your body is not fully exposed as it make it a lot harder for enemy to land all pellets. \n6. Instead of mp5 I use AMAX built for close range: 5mw, stippled, 45, optic, concussive underbarrel launcher. The launcher give me a lot more utility to deal with shotguns, it is also one of the strongest counters to riot shield and op tool in general. This is actually the reason I stopped playing with R9.", "694" ], [ "SA87:\nCompensator, 25.4 barrel, 60 mag, vlk/scout, tac laser. Same ads and mobility as meta build of amax but more accurate, bigger mag, more damage per bullet, faster ttk, .can hit up to 4 limb shots with no punishment.\nMono build is ok too:\nMono, 60, ranger, optic, tac laser.\n\nSMG amax:\nClassic: hi mini/corp holo, 5mw stippled, 45, no stock - mp5 is tiny bit better at closest range but its significantly\nUtility: 5mw, stippled, 45, no stock/optic, underbarrel launcher. \nUnderbarrel launcher doesn't punish mobility or ads, so amax is still op. \nIncendiary - straight upgrade to regular thermite.\nConcussive/flash - they explode on impact, so can be used a lot more aggressively, also, riot shield enemies are free kd boost. \nSmoke - very valuable for team work.\nSnapshot - great for scanning buildings. \nAnd you get up to 7 shots of each, so can use them a lot more frivolously.", "316" ], [ "Truegamedata is based on stats without recoil reduction, we don't have data for fully kitted weapons.\n\n\nYou can't trust what competitive players use, history has made it clear. First, they were playing grau the most, so Kilo is the most easy transition. Second, getting used to new guns takes time to get used to, there is no incentive to learn new weapon unless some other gun is significantly better.\nRegardless, you have flawed assumption that most accurate is the best, it couldn't be farther from the truth. I can name you multiple guns with which you can land every single shot up to 150 meters away but in vast majority cases it is actually bad to engage enemy at such distances. \nMultiple guns are viable for different reasons. \nAmax/RAM/M4/Oden/fal dominate close/mid range, while decent at long range. \nM13 shits on every single AR past 85 meters and competes kilo at close/mid range, if you are able to hit some headshots.\nPKM/sa87 dominate long range. \nLots of viable choices but pros have no incentive to risk learning new gun, when the gun they already good at is already good.", "694" ], [ "Averages are very misleading. A single limb shot for amax slows ttk by 1 bullet. However, if you land a headshot, then you can do multiple limb shots with no punishment. Also, amax requires 3 headshots to reduce ttk, so shortened ttk is not common.\nAmax at close will most commonly be 476-571ms and rarely 380ms.\nKilo doesn't punish for limb shots and needs 2 headshots to shorten ttk, so most common ttk is 639 and less frequently 559.", "694" ], [ "In trios/quads resurgence I've had the most success by dropping into prison bottom.\nRarely too many people there. Always plenty of loot to get weapons and loadout money. \nLots of cover and retreating points, that allow to outsmart/outskill opponents, or simply run away.\nDisadvantage is to safely reach a shop but it's still worth it and gave my team highest success rate. \n\n\nHeadquarters bottom building (not watch tower) seems to be the best for duos. Plenty of action to ensure the game is not boring, easy access to shop, which is well covered. You just lock down the place, abuse sales time and rotate, when circle pushes. \nThis place was best to land, when the mode just came. But after Resurgence trios returned, lobbies became super sweaty and prison bottom became a lot more consistent. But no matter how sweaty lobbies are, this place is still best for duos or solos. \n\nAlso, there may be other great places to land but I did not discovered them.", "444" ], [ "Stuns in general are CQC to mid range tools. Putting it on a long range ARs makes little sense. You need a weapon that can compete SMGs up close, so that you have every advantage possible to follow up on your stuns. M13/Kilo/Grau have very slow TTK times, so running with one in CQC/mid range environment will put you at general disadvantage. \n\nAs work around you can use amped to switch to SMG right after you stun but you still have a problem of not being able to get out launcher fast, when holding SMG. Also, if you run out of bullets and need to switch back to AR, you will still have launcher mode on AR and won't be able to shoot immediately. \n\nYou can indeed have a versatile AR with hybrid optic that gives -25% side to side recoil and can be zoomed out for CQC. But considering that you can start with overkill or pick up decent long range option from enemies/floor loot, specialized CQC/mid range build is a lot stronger and AMAX/RAM7/FAL are bets options for that. \n\nI have newer post on launchers in case you did not see it: \n[_URL_0_](_URL_1_)", "694" ], [ "Indeed a lot of streamers move like silvers, yet, are so good at beaming people in impossible ways. \nTrust me, he uses aimbot. \nI've scrutinized quite a few of his videos.\n\nIn this thread look for my discussion with <PERSON>, we've shared plenty of samples and pointed out patterns that make those things Sus:\n_URL_0_\n\nBy this point I've look at quite a few pro players videos and have seen difference between legit and fake aimers.", "919" ], [ "It's definitely OP and I regretted not investing into gas mask so many times. \n\n1. You can't avoid gas, it closes too aggressive, there is an environment obstacle or you have an enemy gatekeeping you. Gas mask in those situations gives you time to get out of the gas. \n\n2. You get downed and as you self-revive or get revived, gas covers you. Mask makes a difference between you and your teammate being alive or not. Without mask you revive in gas only to get downed again almost immediately. If I don't have mask, I can't even risk reviving teammate that is in the gas. \n\n3. You can flank with gas mask. If enemy has no mask, he will be force to rotate, while you can wait and start shooting at enemy from gas. In final circles flank through gas can completely catch enemy off guard. \n\n4. You can retreat into gas to re-plate and reposition in situations, where it otherwise would be impossible.\n\nPeople that avoid gas mask are not very bright, period.", "80" ], [ "I understand. Do you really feel that 25ms difference though? \n\nI can't decide myself, if Focus is worth it. Flinch is minimal even without focus but with focus it is literally non-existent. \n\nAlso, for hyper aggressive playstyle I am considering just taking off suppressor. You get to keep Focus and with sports comb instead of suppressor ADS boost is massive.", "590" ], [ "If you want SMG replacement, you need 5mw+stippled on your AR to minimize sprint to fire disadvantage.\n\nOut of MW ARs only AMAX can act as true SMG replacement with this build:optic, 5mw, stippled, 45, No stock. You get true SMG mobility, MP5 with FTAC is only 1.6% faster. Optic can be replaced but it's extremely difficult to be consistent with iron sight due to visual recoil. but unlike MP5 this build takes a long while to master but it enjoys certain advantages over SMGs.\n\nFFAR is likely better option now though not just cos of TTK but because it punishes for limb shots a lot less.\n\nAMAX is still N1 pairing with Kar98 for me though due to this:[_URL_0_](_URL_1_)", "316" ], [ "Understand. I don't think anyone claims to be SJW, it is a derogatory term.. My views are not politically motivated, nor I take sides on the matter or like to get involved in politics, I see SJW like behaviour on all sides of pollical spectrum, each adheres to their own ideology. I don't mean to dehumanize a certain side, I see it more as extremist people on all sides.\n\nThanks for explaining.", "763" ], [ "Agree. \nI would stop using the word but at the moment don't know an alternative to describe someone who uses his ideological views to shame someone with different ideological views, while feeling self-righteous.\n\nAlso, nice to find this group. Youtube inevitably drove me to right-wing fest of channels, where I can agree that certain things are wrong but motivations are often vastly different from my individual views. Things being apolitical make my life a lot easier.", "965" ], [ "Then as I said: your lobbies are not sweaty enough. Often multiple teams land on roof. And even if you win initial fight, you are stuck with next to no armor and loot around. Some fker will always be sniping from headquarter tower. At any point someone can decide to push and force fight, and while you fight, someone else will third party you. People that land in other locations will get loot faster than you and have easier access to a shop, then they will hunt you down with better weapons and resources.", "558" ], [ "By SBMM kicked hard I mean that I land in superstore and I have to do absolutely my best to win every fight. People slide cancel, bunny hop, abuse cover/ power positions. The first week I was a lot worse skill wise and superstore was a lot easier. By next week I learned a lot but lobbies got a lot more difficult too. \n\nCheaters are attracted to superstore like magnet. Maybe 3-4 games in exaggeration but every evening I would die 2 or 3 times to a cheater. Also, diamond lobbies are a lot more infested with cheaters.", "190" ], [ "Holy shit, now I get why you bothered to reply. First, I was talking about weekly performance(weekly kd). Second, by saying suddenly I don't mean literally from one game to another. I eventually realized that lobbies got a lot harder than the week I started playing solos and that despite vastly improvement I have hard time keeping 2kd.", "538" ], [ "Here is one example:\n_URL_0_\n\nIn 0.25 speed you can see how he aims of target but the moment he shoots, it flicks pixel perfect on target. And it locks like that twice. \nIf you drop bias and actually watch his kills in 0.25 in whatever video you choose, you will notice things to be too perfect. Especially amax and nerfed Bruen are obvious because visual recoil and shitty reticle do not affect his crosshair accuracy and reaction times at long ranges at all.", "694" ], [ "Don't care. This is not a random stream sniper, this is a regular guy that does it for him. At 5:30 the guy was flying past on heli and <PERSON> said it is his homie and discouraged teammates from shooting. At 10:00 he did not just get help from random guy, he knew it is his \"homie\", he told teammates not to shoot to get more money, this is blatant cheating and gaining unfair advantage. By your logic I should start using aimbot and wallhack because in every game there are cheaters and aimboters. Cheating is cheating, there is never a justification for it.", "496" ], [ "1. Play plunder until you get good at mechanics and with the guns you like.\n2. Play solos and drop in superstore every time. This is where you learn to be good individually and win gulags.\n3. Join this channel: [_URL_0_](_URL_0_), so you can find decent teammates to play with.\n4. Keep using plunder as warmup and comeback to solos ones in a while to keep your individual performance up.", "668" ], [ "SA87 with this build: Compensator, 25.4 barrel, 60, tac laser, vlk/scout. Past 40 meters it is a straight upgrade to AMAX in literally every way. \nPROS:\n\n1. Side to side bounce is non-existent. Despite strong vertical recoil I can land every single bullet 150-200 meters away on a stationary target. \n2. Faster TTK: 700ms compared to AMAX's 726.\n3. Next to no punishment for stomach/limb shots. You have to land 5 limb shots with no headshots for your TTK to be slower. For AMAX in comparison even a single limb shot worsens TTK. \n4. Larger mag and more damage per bullet at long range. Makes it potent squad wiper.\n5. Faster than AMAX bullet velocity. Not as fast as Kilo but still big improvement compared to AMAX.\n6. Same mobility, sprint to fire and ADS as meta AMAX despite it technically being LMG.\n\nCons:\n\n1. Requires to sacrifice suppressor. But easily mitigated, if you play aggressively and don't stay in one place for long. \n2. Visual recoil like on AMAX. The only thing that holds it back at long range. Make sure to ping enemies and shoot in the direction of ping. Work on your recoil muscle memory. Consider bursts, so you can re-identify the target between shots. \n3. Visible laser. Doesn't matter at long range though. \n\n\nBest secondary: \n\nAMAX: 5mw, stippled, 45/sleight, optic/no stock, underbarrel launcher(concussive or incendiary). Straight upgrade over mp5/mp7, especially, if you choose optic for consistency. Underbarrel launcher is a huge cherry on top, an OP utility that no SMG can give you: \n[_URL_1_](_URL_0_)", "316" ], [ "I understand. It's one of those things, where you have wrong loadout for the occasion. You needed SMG/shotgun/riot shield yourself to have better odds. Jiggle peaking everywhere is the best thing you can do, which is especially effective against shotgun as they can't land all pellets into small body part you expose. But being consistent with that is very difficult, you get lazy overtime and become careless. Also, just stay away from close quarters with such loadout, period. Center of superstore is a bit more opened to mitigate advantage of shotguns.", "694" ], [ "Well, those things are not related to juggernaut. You can't blame trophy vehicles and cheaters on juggernaut. Riot shield happens to be best counter to cheaters too. \n\nIf you really hate vehicles, use crossbow or AMR, their shots go past trophy system. The only problem with this option is that that it is aids to pair them with riot shield, so you may have to choose what you hate more: juggernaut or vehicles. Also, use vehicles with trophy yourself.", "476" ], [ "I didn't say they should. Just gave ways to deal with them. If meta shifts to use loadouts that counter them, then they become a lot less viable. \n\nI am, also, thinking to try jugger hunter strat. Grab the right loadout and actively hunt him immediately. Knowing that other players will stay away 1v1 is achievable. And if it is not solos, do it together with squad. As reward you get portable minigun.", "500" ], [ "You raise great points but I think it is a matter of perspective.\n\nAccuracy and fast velocity gives you more consistency compared to other launchers.\n\nSlower reload speed is an issue but it will not always matter. Often all you need is one good shot to gain advantage on enemy team and make the job for your teammates easier. When dealing with vehicles you mostly get only one shot before car drives away, so Strela is a straight upgrade to bazooka.\n\nAnd going past trophy system is absolutely huge. Every time a team camps with a trophy system, you have a solid counter. Vehicles with trophy are indeed not common but they absolutely can screw the round for you. Even if trophy car is just driving past, with strela it becomes free KD boost and you guaranty for them not being an issue later on. No matter how rarely you have to deal with trophy systems, having one guy with a counter to them can save you games and the make the team overall more versatile.", "476" ], [ "It's not. PKM is LMG, while S87 is like an AR.\n\nCons of PKM:\n\n1. Bolt action delay: 67ms.\n2. Very slow sprint to fire, 62ms slower.\n3. Huge reload time - obvious one.\n4. Without compensator I doubt it is as accurate as SA87 even if vertical recoil is smaller.\n5. Mobility is 3% slower.\n\nBolt action delay removes TTK advantage that it is supposed to have over SA87. Whenever you stop shooting, you have to deal with this delay again. It is especially aids dealing with head glitchers.\n\nWhenever you have to push, extra slow sprint to fire and bolt action delay will prevent you from shooting for 129ms longer compared to regular ARs, which is a long time and very impractical for aggressive plays.\n\nOverall, I would say PKM excels at defensive play, while SA87 gives you versatility of an AR.", "694" ], [ "Yeah, Corona situation was severely underestimated. But imho outline of cities makes a huge difference. Whole country is bunch of concentrated towns, especially, London. You may live in a country side but the moment you need to go work, you inevitably will have to encounter countless people on the way. Also, forcing people to follow certain guidelines in a country known for freedom is a difficult task politicians can't enforce totalitarian rules as it will spark protests and other counterproductive activities.", "110" ], [ "I see. Actually wanted to ask, if you are from different country, where standards are different. From that perspective, yes. \nUSA liberals are not really liberals at all cos they are just another group with their own ideological and ideas and intolerance against other ideas in the form of cancel culture. \n\n<PERSON> actually seem like such a better choice compared to <PERSON> but as you said he is considered \"extremist\".", "285" ], [ "Amax is trash with iron sight, especially, for close range setup. I had months of experience in mutliplayer and can tell you that with iron sight it's way too inconsistent. I tried all sorts of things an optic helps a lot more compared to compensator/muzzle break or whatever other recoil reduction attachment. With optic you can super consistent, land all shots up to 50 meters away and able to aim at the head level, thus pushing skill ceiling up. \n\nBest setup I found: 5mw, stippled, optic, no stock, 45/sleight. \n5mw+stippled give SMG like sprint to fire and decent hipfire.\nNo stock gives SMG mobility and ads. To me it feels like straight upgrade to mp5/mp7 both in mutliplayer and warzone.", "694" ], [ "Points 1 and 2 are very specific. I would use Stella like crossbow, where I peak entrance/corner, shoot and then follow up with whatever else. In my case I see exactly where I shoot and I will flick right on enemy. Crossbow is a better weapon for such job but it requires overkill, while strela doesn't. You really shoot treat this weapon like crossbow alternative, where you peak corners or out of cover and trash anyone within 50-70 meters. \nSo don't agree, advantage over trophy is very relevant.", "694" ], [ "Within 10.68 meters it is 50/50. Faster ttk 479 vs 526ms but mp5 still has faster sprint to fire(25-89ms depending on mp5 attachments) and with 5mw better hipfire. Also, mp5 has better headshot multiplier. Bottom line managing sprint to fire disadvantage is important to make it fair fight. However, outside 10.68m range I shit on mp5, ttk is unchanged up to 24 meters, while mp5 ttk gets worse and worse: 677/827/978ms. Also, mp5 has huge random side to side bounce (especially with ftac),which hurts your accuracy at 20m+, amax despite visual recoil has very little random bounce. And outside 10.68 m range mp5 loses a lot of damage per mag, so you will have hard time killing more than 2 people, while amax still has enough damage to wipe squad.\n\nAs of mp7, it doesn't compete amax at any range. It is a more skill demanding gun but well worth it as SMG replacement.", "316" ], [ "Interesting, I may test it out. I still wouldn't take it off, though. When I played amax with copmensator+commando, bullet velocity was quite slow, so right now I am quite enjoying SA87's velocity advantage. And as I said, sa87 is super accurate anyway. I did tests against bots and with practice I could land almost all shots at 150m away. In ground war I've been deleting snipers up to 250m away with a single spray.", "694" ], [ "Highly depends on your playstyle. I play aggressive and stay mobile. Other times I hold power positions, where enemies would have learned my position anyway. Also, in majority situations some of your teammates have no loadout, so they will compromise position anyway. But most important is how forgoing suppressor makes the gun stronger, I can win more fights with it.", "558" ], [ "You can solve this problem by pairing the gun with LMGs or high calibre ARs. Amax for example give a lot more value per bullet compared to Kilo. \n\nCurrently I play with SA87+amax and I have no ammo issues like at all. Amax is not Val but still. In my experience if I keep fighting at long range, SMG wouldn't help to conserve ammo. And if I have engagements within SMG range, I almost always can loot. Also, if it's just you doing that on the team teammates can spare you a mag or two in worse case.", "316" ], [ "Although it is just fun build, it is literally the first time I see someone doing correct SMG build on an AR. \n\nAnd if you get serious, try this Amax:\ngi mini/corp holo, 5mw, stippled, 45, no stock.\nOptic instead of foregrip to counter visual recoil and to be able to land all shots up to 40 meters, based on months of experience I can confirm that optic helps significantly more than compensator, muzzle break or a foregrip.", "316" ], [ "My primary AR ttk is worse within 40 meters. Close range engagements often go just outside MP5's 10.68 meters range. \nWhenever I need to rush enemy or close distance, if they re-peak too early, with mp5 I am as good as dead, while with amax can hit them at full strength.\n\nWeapon swap is super fast with amped but you got me curious, wanna know the actual time difference.\n\nAmax is nowhere as noob friendly as mp5 but believe me, it's well worth it.", "316" ], [ "Well, yes. At close and mid range it's absolutely true. \n\nAt 80+ meters you inevitably will hit limb shots. AMAX TTK with 1 limb shot at long range is 857 compared to M13's 876ms regardless of limb shots, so barely any TTK difference. And M13 is more accurate, has much better headshot multiplier, faster bullet velocity and no visual recoil. \n\nSo on practice at long ranges AMAX doesn't have advantage over M13 in vast majority cases despite better chest TTK, when all factors are considered.", "316" ], [ "Yeah, Kilo popularity is solely due to noob friendliness. With the right playstyle or loadout composition you can make lots of other guns as viable or more viable. Pros use Kilo because of tournament format, they play bots, so range versatility becomes more important than TTK. If pros played other pros, Kilo would be one of the least popular choices. \n\nAMAX TTK at close range with limb shots is 666ms compared to M4's 594ms, so in fact slower than M4. This is why I strongly recommend to always use optic on AMAX even for close range builds because it allows you to aim head level and you can be a lot more consistent in general.\n\nFormula for TTK calculation is like this:\n\n60/rate of fire \\* (shots to kill - 1).\n\nshots to kill = health / damage\n\nYou can get rates of fire and damage for any gun from [_URL_0_](https://_URL_0_).", "316" ], [ "I will add extra column \"TTK per shot\" to the spreadsheet link to make it easier to calculate punishments/rewards. People just need to weigh in the factor of this post together with all other known factors. \n\nAs example AMAX vs M13 at long range:\n762ms vs 876ms. But with AMAX you will hit limb shots at long to extreme ranges most of the time, so much more likely TTK comparison would be 857ms (+1 bullet) vs 876ms - barely any difference. \nAnd if we take into account other factors like M13 having faster velocity, a lot less visual recoil, better headshot multiplier and better accuracy, then it is clear which gun is the winner at long range. \n\nKilo has slower TTK than M13 at long range, so AMAX has much better chance of winning regardless of limb shots as long as the range is not bigger than 100-120 meters.\n\nIf you take gun like SA87, however, which allows up to 4 limb shots with 0 punishment, then 700ms is the real TTK in vast majority cases, unless you miss shots entirely. This was the biggest factor that made me use it instead of AMAX for long range.", "316" ], [ "Default reticle of Corp holo makes it very easy to see your recoil direction and compensate for it. Recoil is strong with no stock, so you get extra good at controlling recoil. So if you master recoil on this build, recoil on long range build will be super easy to control. \n\nAlso, this build is an excellent SMG replacement and I personally have had more success with it than with MP5.", "694" ], [ "Doesn't need nerf at all. It's most popular but there are plenty other guns that are just as viable.\n\nIt is probably the best for controllers due to how it is harder to aim but definitely not the case for mouse/keyboard.\n\nAlso, pros use Kilo due to how it fits best current tournament format. Pros are placed into bot lobbies, slow ttk doesn't matter as they will shit on bots all the same, however, extra range versatility absolutely helps for rushing teams and killing at farthest range possible. As regular player you don't need to rush for kills, you can be methodical and with the right playstyle and loadout composition you can make other guns more viable.\nAlso, had tournaments been about pros vs pros, <PERSON> probably would go to trash tier.", "694" ], [ "Compensator is worth it only on high recoil guns for long range builds. SA87 benefits by far the most out of all guns in the game. It has next to no side recoil, copmensator brings recoil down enough to take full advantage of that. I can land nearly all bullets at 150 metres away and can beam snipers up to 250 meters away.", "694" ], [ "Suppressor viability heavily depends on playstyle. I play aggressive and mobile, I mitigate suppressor disadvantage by repositioning after shooting whenever I can. I, also, play for info, it means that I peak windows or out of cover, it helps awareness and situation judgement but allows enemies to find you. \n\nOften at least one teammate doesn't have suppressor, so your position is compromised regardless. In cqc fights almost always someone doesn't have suppressor, shotgun or whatnot, so again your position is compromised. Also, often people find you by bullet tracers or by simply making educated guess of your position. \n\nGuns I would disregard suppressor on: AMAX, AK, FAL, SA87 and maybe Oden. Those guns have slower ads and high recoil, so other attachments benefit them a lot more. Just removing suppressor already helps with ads. And it doesn't have to be compensator, can opt for tac/5mw/stippled for aggressive play. \n\nFor guns like Kilo/Grau/m13 suppressor makes a lot of sense, they are already super accurate and you don't want enemies to close distance, where you are weaker.\n\nFor m4/ram I don't know, if it's worth it, they are middle ground between Amax and Kilo.\n\nAlso, I am not fun of suppressors for cqc weapons(except SMGs as they often have barrel that comes with suppressor). For sniper rifles suppressors are a must.", "694" ] ]
426
[ 14936, 12389, 19522, 9531, 6548, 1227, 9451, 4968, 11325, 5508, 21943, 15533, 13143, 10288, 1134, 872, 11137, 5409, 8348, 5749, 19851, 9062, 4169, 25498, 2231, 6185, 9862, 14600, 20022, 11901, 4382, 8393, 4206, 3353, 6015, 4975, 17663, 10169, 13699, 21982, 17893, 14682, 5513, 3492, 3862, 6927, 14792, 24392, 2288, 20600, 365, 25466, 6988, 6502, 15182, 12014, 4563, 3044, 18159, 7620, 22665, 24258, 18427, 14898, 2526, 25132, 3727, 14499, 8832, 18368, 24628, 1939, 4069, 7983, 6892, 14335, 7074, 13616, 2474, 2397, 16250, 2809, 14888, 19180, 9132, 12967, 23970, 13881, 15292, 15687, 5253, 19388, 17078, 2209, 8173, 24947, 18417, 1651, 4270, 2698, 9235, 25495, 11035, 19576, 23427, 18606, 17097, 22563, 6003, 12502, 21342, 8839, 9979, 10227, 25059, 612, 1268, 3947, 9529, 8125, 4727, 3601, 21101, 2760, 1959, 11836, 899, 1667, 16995, 16648, 19153, 20433, 11536, 17968, 4944, 9040, 17661, 18802, 12241, 3646, 9459, 16095, 8361, 10871, 14536, 14637, 6009, 3713, 3354, 3227, 24475, 7928, 23228, 12177, 18918, 8749, 4051, 22420, 5104, 22403, 18552, 830, 17715, 23451, 20821, 3563, 5791, 6014, 21579, 20181, 446, 20936, 6591, 15544, 8252, 3172, 369, 9328, 25192, 6909, 7254, 19685, 25182, 8673, 22426, 2923, 8738, 6391, 10298, 12276, 212, 2111, 4456, 6241, 16663, 6045, 6867, 8963, 15655, 14580, 20943, 24778, 24805, 7711, 7731, 4174, 7664, 4082, 24893, 8309, 3049, 12713, 5867, 2684, 13457, 14874, 18840, 21239, 14281, 287, 11584, 21365, 14816, 22060, 8876, 4720, 15382, 3322, 4489, 16883, 22950, 1081, 22471, 9664, 18821, 10313, 3674, 16919, 10821, 6206, 20826, 15269, 4418, 12189, 13273, 17916, 12163, 13818, 17254, 14930, 4332, 16079, 14774, 7261, 10758, 3082, 12333, 17866, 25294, 10048, 24119, 8995, 4447, 18461, 13556, 1610, 5745, 21032, 1886, 14250, 14703, 7279, 10425, 1490, 8205, 13911, 8550, 19306, 20626, 1941, 11125, 15663, 7222, 5512, 4938, 10463, 199, 3475, 9158, 15131, 17819, 1831, 7876, 9725, 18262, 20321, 21886, 2769, 8263, 21646, 12970, 128, 11686, 699, 3008, 729, 9067, 6942, 7249, 8446, 21209, 12746, 9619, 17099, 9943, 20493, 19571, 389, 13165, 22071, 11861, 8960, 22131, 11679, 25238, 9740, 5194, 9348, 8152, 6810, 19895, 13360, 17178, 1054, 8716, 14741, 25397, 24614, 23920, 23260, 14571, 19392, 14897, 7298, 24473, 5863, 24332, 24039, 18863, 24492, 7245, 19957, 8585, 15532, 15328, 20216, 20095, 12886, 3973, 7523, 11890, 23178, 11579, 17402, 2634, 8437, 8038, 20675, 12065, 7488, 7227, 11762, 24006, 6449, 12028, 4888, 23664, 5913, 11920, 14040, 20592, 24892, 14603, 24692, 8591, 12130, 1064, 7289, 14348, 25133, 3125, 14756, 25025, 5611, 12120, 13420, 25494, 21815, 24125, 1518, 12653, 5642, 16812, 10133, 5619, 15355, 4437, 22864, 4455, 18875, 7647, 5151, 7251, 10410, 14705, 23650, 21039, 17766, 23300, 6480, 19826, 22523, 2738, 10100, 10481, 1127, 9910, 24381, 2149, 6865, 6422, 9023, 20662, 7776, 14523, 13734, 4916, 4900, 23902, 9628, 4198, 22993, 24827, 12181, 21063, 14636, 11314, 14693, 1091, 1386, 11806, 19602, 22619, 25481, 10175, 16452, 13369, 22811, 19942, 13830, 23123, 10967, 15556, 1672, 8566, 3194, 5014, 24109, 12033, 14805, 6815, 19874, 1530, 4637, 3961, 11521, 7334, 1836, 16455, 7755, 9795, 7871, 14504, 2527, 2601, 10326, 617, 1908, 5789, 19421, 17015, 22373, 19359, 14757, 6844, 1150, 24738, 10470, 19952 ]
reddit_dump_-B-K-
[ [ "Ok, so first off... The power input on the mosfet does not look correct. What is that tiny blue wire doing jumping between positive and negative? Also, why are the switch wires thicker than the IH wires? The switch doesn't carry that much current due to the use of a mosfet. However, the Power input and output from the mosfet can carry up to 10A. Which means your wiring should be at least 18 gauge to support that 10A load. If you don't have 18G laying around, then you at least need to swap the switch wires for the IH wires. \n\n\nYour switch is wired fine... Although, it is important to know that your switch is no longer accepting a positive and a negative. The way the momentary works, is both the in and the out carry a positive signal. Pushing the button down completes the circuit of the positive wire and flips the switch on the mosfet to allow power to flow past it. \n\n\nAlso, how much current (amperage) does your power supply have? You will need at a minimum a 6A supply.", "542" ], [ "Interesting... But, that does make some sense. Although realistically, it should be the other way around. Removing a wrap from the coil lowers it's resistance meaning it should take more amps to fire it. \n\n\nBut, the more important question here is why just go with the bare minimum? With a > 6A power supply, you won't have any issues or have to make coil winding adjustments. Plug and play pretty much. And the cost difference between a 5A and a 6A supply is negligible.", "542" ], [ "The glass tube is more there to prevent thermal transfer to the electronics from the heated dynavap. Although it could be argued that they are there to protect against shorts. The coil itself is coated/insulated to prevent shorts with other metal objects. The IH would work the same with the dynavap with or without the glass... But, the glass gives an aesthetic quality to it as well as a place for your LED's to shine through. With all of that said... I use the Cloupor M3-M4 replacement glass with a tactile momentary switch under the coil insulated by carbon felt. \n\n\nEDIT: Also, you want to be sure that anything you insert into the coil as a button insulator is non-conductive.", "333" ], [ "I was also a Flash developer starting out... You can safely blame Apple for the demise of Flash. They were the only smartphone that didn't support the flash player on any level. While you may have had abysmal experience on any mobile with the flash plugin back in the day... At least it worked. After Apple stated that they would never support the Flash player... Things took a turn for Flash.", "21" ], [ "I see what you are saying... But, generally, if you make the diameter smaller, without increasing the wraps, or changing the length of the wire, then it should be the same resistance. Normally though, when you would decrease the diameter of a coil, you end up with longer legs that need to be trimmed which then would lower the resistance. Increasing the number of wraps should increase the resistance of the coil making it take less amperage to operate it. I am definitely interested to see if BH chimes in on this... As I am sure there is a good reason he does it that way. I still just don't see why you wouldn't use at a minimum a 6A supply to avoid having to adjust the coil to be functional.", "542" ], [ "Yes, I agree that the load changes based on the amount of work piece inserted into the coil. No doubt. But, changing the diameter of the coil still shouldn't take much if any more power from the power supply than a wider diameter coil does. It may cause faster heat ups with a smaller diameter coil as the heat will be more focused... But, like I said... why even risk it running the bare minimum? Just use a 6A or greater supply and remove the need to adjust the coil so it can work with a 5A supply.", "542" ], [ "Ok, that makes sense (blue wire), thanks for explaining that. However, if you have tried both a 5A and a 10A supply, then I believe the issue is likely the gauge of wire you are using. The wires inside the power in on the mosfet appear to be less than 26awg, which cannot carry the amount of current necessary to fire the coil. You will need beefier wires (18awg) to carry that amperage. The wires you have going to the IH from the \"out\" on the mosfet appear to be \\~24awg, which is also too small to push the amount of current necessary to fire the IH. \n\n\nIt is a possibility that the IH is defective, but I would definitely try using thicker wires to wire everything and test it like that. My guess is swapping out the wires for 18awg (use whatever wires you want on the button as they do not carry much amperage) and using the 10A supply will get you running.", "542" ], [ "Got ya... Yeah, having the momentary on the case, rather than under the coil will make the wiring and setup a bit easier. However, you may not want to put a magnet inside the coil... It will conduct, and heating magnets over time causes them to lose their magnetism. If you can ensure that your magnet will not be in the path of the heating, then it may work. I, however, would not recommend it. The rubber plug and the glass tube will be enough to hold it vertically. \n\n\nINFO: The type of magnet you need to center the vapcap on is known as a \"diametric magnet\".", "304" ], [ "Nice! So, the coil itself doesn't really heat up per-say. It will only heat once something metal has been inserted into it. Are you saying that even after you insert something, the coil is not heating the object you are inserting? \n\n\nHow is your coil wired to the IH module? Both, outside connections (ignoring the middle), correct? As far as the screws go... As long as they are tight enough so you cannot pull the coil legs out of the terminal, then they are good. I typically do solder my coil legs to the IH... But, i also have one IH (my first) that uses the screw terminals and it is working just fine.", "304" ], [ "Got ya... So, the blue LED on the IH lights up when you hit your switch like it should... But, the coil is not firing. Do you notice any visual damage to any of the components on the IH board? If not, then my guess it is just not making a good connection with the coil for some reason. If you have the ability to solder the coil to the two metal plates on top of the IH module, you can try that. But, it really should work through the blue terminal unless there is a problem with that terminal itself. You are using your 10A supply, correct?", "1006" ], [ "Something is not right there... The LED on the IH module should only come on when the switch is in the on position. How many legs does your switch have coming off of it, just two? \n\n\nIt should work like this... When plugged in, the mosfet LED and the IH LED should be off while the switch has not been engaged (in the off position). Once the switch is in the on position, the mosfet LED and the IH led should light until you let go of the button. Are you using a momentary switch or a latching switch? \n\n\nIt very well could be a faulty IH... Just trying to rule out all of the possibilities.", "1006" ], [ "Got ya... yeah, it definitely sounded like the switch wiring was to blame for the IH always being on. I've never used one of those 5 pin switches for an IH, but here is a basic diagram of how to wire it. [_URL_0_](_URL_0_) Basically, go Red wire to \"J1\" on the mosfet, Black wire to Ground \"In\" on the mosfet, and yellow wire to the Positive \"Out\" on the mosfet.", "1006" ] ]
193
[ 1995, 9236, 11823, 22585, 9648, 542, 5978, 2099, 6211, 19719, 16373, 15886, 24149, 6839, 19972, 18239, 9641, 14323, 10377, 12589, 16226, 12690, 11510, 17395, 6899, 2518, 15194, 20283, 22871, 13880, 537, 6296, 5428, 23557, 7585, 11144, 17171, 277, 24654, 24489, 14501, 3508, 11719, 6179, 8479, 14242, 24541, 324, 7958, 3701, 25102, 14842, 17632, 13845, 22256, 20490, 10490, 15279, 4713, 23863, 15530, 15991, 5266, 18655, 14219, 15810, 3183, 9978, 12510, 21125, 14869, 2542, 10670, 18396, 21103, 8029, 20601, 9990, 19997, 6572, 3272, 2614, 17529, 16204, 9845, 1422, 6829, 2291, 19532, 22019, 2553, 22548, 11677, 3998, 8443, 13089, 25275, 22912, 5184, 1599, 15047, 11657, 22775, 15515, 19907, 19838, 19124, 5413, 14833, 23289, 21107, 162, 1123, 8546, 12986, 25177, 15205, 6242, 19665, 23674, 7423, 238, 8474, 12098, 15026, 4630, 15613, 18838, 16144, 1438, 24824, 7156, 7753, 9199, 6520, 24945, 10876, 14574, 23314, 2860, 3538, 651, 11327, 17405, 6978, 18479, 8991, 10009, 10756, 4878, 2792, 8187, 7959, 17832, 4862, 10140, 23922, 19352, 7730, 12522, 23516, 10354, 24305, 6200, 10819, 20681, 20575, 16480, 20169, 4111, 3543, 7882, 11708, 329, 12275, 15208, 9922, 8225, 23620, 17686, 14997, 15958, 6155, 3024, 22782, 19230, 19965, 15520, 11529, 22805, 3546, 1346, 6508, 6849, 23517, 16511, 25517, 8854, 3043, 3675, 5226, 9036, 46, 8094, 25413, 12712, 5858, 13504, 19211, 6645, 12419, 6209, 13049, 853, 10349, 6330, 4443, 19073, 5252, 16712, 17749, 16257, 25316, 19353, 23488, 5810, 7774, 24657, 21202, 5535, 23105, 4279, 9037, 18873, 18354, 5091, 24277, 25311, 16467, 17282, 14591, 17860, 11665, 23796, 2734, 14999, 24910, 18004, 7675, 21939, 16383, 17929, 11539, 24274, 11027, 22717, 18402, 14327, 18214, 8366, 23249, 17377, 21575, 1575, 5871, 23386, 14183, 14903, 21895, 9073, 6393, 25381, 10956, 17845, 24956, 23161, 1424, 4461, 23389, 20351, 19150, 22470, 17542, 19307, 900, 3989, 22875, 17096, 7326, 21131, 20015, 15809, 19736, 8098, 17014, 14192, 14459, 16264, 307, 23342, 3195, 2627, 1923, 4425, 452, 23521, 22813, 21853, 20598, 14245, 21297, 18006, 6766, 14420, 2631, 8968, 12647, 12815, 19336, 23850, 18676, 3731, 21611, 15790, 23982, 16826, 20123, 16530, 23744, 16759, 2084, 13203, 20582, 6806, 2229, 24049, 314, 19188, 3741, 10731, 4019, 13066, 5529, 2214, 12764, 18391, 23797, 25476, 8517, 10419, 2245, 23725, 13524, 23103, 6659, 9061, 10901, 19603, 3657, 11774, 1255, 13895, 7394, 1069, 2382, 669, 14060, 7528, 19541, 9205, 15622, 996, 1732, 15001, 5299, 7225, 7268, 23501, 18285, 9192, 1525, 2390, 17579, 15443, 3946, 11405, 8258, 20735, 20785, 21094, 16076, 8905, 19565, 25119, 8786, 20762, 14086, 795, 903, 20450, 9175, 7134, 4566, 9679, 12901, 4090, 23590, 19744, 5196, 22483, 15306, 22947, 3659, 13239, 9969, 23201, 7087, 16424, 3384, 12710, 22118, 16654, 15064, 18583, 3916, 19364, 1063, 341, 4331, 6754, 585, 14918, 19369, 15843, 17220, 11576, 14363, 18558, 17605, 23536, 9091, 24477, 7661, 12779, 1695, 17166, 25361, 1817, 23366, 5167, 1209, 875, 18710, 25188, 17142, 11479, 16357, 23350, 2501, 19042, 18351, 17393, 1457, 12935, 4305, 3086, 17492, 14309, 8337, 3764, 18784, 4328, 19286, 11615, 15816, 20593, 18935, 9805, 8218, 21223, 9011, 21208, 18850, 10823, 15984, 19729, 8850, 4854, 2558, 13257, 20453, 15335, 13745, 11068, 15290, 19393, 15738, 6387, 19646 ]
reddit_dump_-BeezusHrist
[ [ "> she was not talking about monopolistic economic power in that tweet.\n\nMonopoly doesn't only have to be related to the monetary economic meaning. It can be related to information as well. Information is also a form of currency or influence. \n\n > she was worried about monopolistic censorship power.\n\nWhich is a result of monopolistic economic market forces, doe. <PERSON> bought Instagram, a competitor, a popular encrypted instant Messaging service whatsapp. If Facebook did not own Instagram, <PERSON> would still be on it and they were competitors in my younger years. With the increased features facebook has added to Instagram, I would even say Instagram is more popular now, at least with the demographics that matter. Anyway, the two issues are intertwined.\n\n > The global twitter thing is an interesting idea and actually adds to this conversation.\n\nIf I were <PERSON> really wanted to be remembered by human history, I would consider lobbying the US government to seize, then give control of the company to the international community plus the United States of America. It's something to consider.\n\nIf we really care about democracy, why dont we give It away. And it would do so much to push the United State's supposed military agenda without military force.", "106" ], [ "> what does your post and original comment have to do with facebook’s ability to silence the speech of their users?\n\nI already answered your question. I'm not necessarily opposed to facebook banning people due to the fact that it is a private company. I don't think its influence is as important as Twitter's in the mainstream either. Also, you sign terms of service for using their private product. Do we respect private property or not??\n\nI said something similar to this in the post above. Facebook banning people is NOT a problem and it has nothing to do with the United State's first amendment as Twitter is a private company. I would tell her to go read the US constitution. \n\n#Amendment I (1791, rev.1992)\n\n*Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances*\n\n[UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION](_URL_0_)\n🇺🇸\n\nAnd if she's truly worried about freedom of speech, become a leftist and critique the capitalist system. Come join us 😉", "106" ], [ "Awww, watch this video \n\n[This video](_URL_0_)\n\n\n > <PERSON> is a fucking socialist\n\nA socialist that pockets $8000 based on a lie, and then gets others to do work for free for him? Sounds like <PERSON> doesn't know what a socialist is. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea is neither democratic nor a People's republic. People can SAY whatever the fuck they want to say and label themselves or others how they want to label them and often, the winners of history get to do the labeling, but actions speak louder than words and it would appear that through actions, <PERSON> acts like a capitalist. If <PERSON> truly is a socialist, he should start back at the drawing board because he has some reading to do. You can't just \"BE\" a socialist, it requires homework. \n\n > You understand that this kind of impropriety can exist in 100% the same capacity in a socialist system. Socialism doesn't actually do anything to combat this kind of abuse.\n\nSocialism is not just a political and economic system, it is a philosophy, a philosophy and a mindset you and Destiny do not seem to understand. If you research the philosopher <PERSON>'s \"Effective Altruism\" concept you can maybe start to understand the prevailing mindset which would exist In a truly democratic and socialist society. The mindset that exists within THIS society contributes to the ruin of capitalism and there will not be reform. In that video, it says that capitalism is a driver of climate change and global poverty, but it is also a driver of fascism as we saw in the State Capitol yesterday. \n\n > You live in a capitalist system.\n\nSo I shouldn't critique it? I live in the United States but I critique it. Are you saying I as a black man should not critique the hypocrisy of the system I exist in? Why? You sound like a conservative. \n\nNot an argument or a reason not to critique obvious contradictions or flaws I see within the system.\n\n#Effective Altruism \n\n*Effective altruism is a philosophy and social movement that advocates using evidence and reasoning to determine the most effective ways to benefit others. Altruism refers to improving the lives of others—as opposed to egoism, which emphasizes only self-interest*\n\nCapitalism PROMOTES egoism on steroids, especially our American system", "534" ], [ "> The idea that people will not be motivate by greed in a socialist system just wreaks of larp.\n\nAgain, you discount the societal mindset and perspective of a truly democratic and socialist system. You need to stop doing that. \n#Effective Altruism \n\n*Effective altruism is a philosophy and social movement that advocates using evidence and reasoning to determine the most effective ways to benefit others. Altruism refers to improving the lives of others—as opposed to egoism, which emphasizes only self-interest*\n\nCapitalism PROMOTES egoism on steroids, especially our American system\n\n > Hate to break it to you, being a good person isn't a prerequisite for any economic ideology.\n\nUnderstanding your role within the society you are in IS a prerequisite for understanding socialism as an economic, political, and philosophical ideology. That is only achieved through EDUCATION \n\n > You can both be a massive thief and a socialist at the same time sorry. \n\nIn a truly democratic socialist system, people who behaved in this way would become social pariah because what is the social benefit of stealing from people? But again, <PERSON> can label himself whatever he wants, but if he does not have an understanding of the thing he is labeling himself with, he isn't really that thing. \n\n<PERSON> calls himself a leftist. Is <PERSON> a leftist? I mean do I really have to walk you through this? Are we really going to take people words at face value or do their actions matter, too? <PERSON> ACTS like a capitalist and therefore in my eyes, is a capitalist. \n\n > There's no part of the capitalism that is contingent on theft.\n\nWell, as firms within markets begin to consolidate, they begin to capture regulators who then pass public policy which benefits these concentrated firms at the expense of the rest of our society. The concentration of wealth and power is theft of our democratic process by a few wealthy elites. How do you defend this? We see clear examples of this. Maybe you're just young. \n\n > Also you seem to have dodged that you also live in a capitalist society and you also purchase things. How exactly is that different from Destiny purchasing a service and getting scamed?\n\nAre you REALLY doing this meme??????? The, \"But you live in society\" Meme??? \n\nAnd I'm not making fun of Destiny for purchasing things and getting ripped off, I'm making fun of Destiny for not understanding that the general mindset the capitalistic system we all currently exist in engenders and promotes the type of behavior committed by <PERSON>: conman, gaslighting, and grifting. And Destiny's inability to see the big picture regarding the economic system he exists in is a sad thing to see.", "101" ], [ "Why are you referencing me you weirdo? Leave me out. And I'm sorry, but you have to read a book before you call yourself a socialist lol. There are prerequisite to it. You're not born into a socialist system or into a socialist mindset. You don't seem to understand that greater society shapes the people within it.\n\nChina is building the type of society I am talking about as we speak, but in authoritarian ways I do not agree with. For example, one of its biggest executives just got caught stealing from the Society. What is the punishment? DEATH. What kind of mindset will this build within that society?? Not a mindset of self interest and greed.\n\nI do not agree with this approach, the approach we will take involves education and it will take time. We're not going to become socialist tomorrow. But the Chinese will have a truly democratic and socialist society perhaps before we do one day. \n\n#Effective Altruism \n\n*Effective altruism is a philosophy and social movement that advocates using evidence and reasoning to determine the most effective ways to benefit others. Altruism refers to improving the lives of others—as opposed to egoism, which emphasizes only self-interest*", "534" ], [ "> I'm pointing you out because you are doing the \"Read Theory\" meme in real time. I think it's rather funny.\n\nNo, I'm actually not. I'm taking about market structures, market failures, and monopoly and you're acting like a complete lunatic for no reason. \n\n > Again. Theory generates arguments.\n\nI am not arguing theory, just empirical facts. \n\n > You should be able to use the definition of Effective Altruism to support your point.\n\nYou should stop debating like this because it's really unintelligent. I brought up effective altruism to demonstrate the mindset that would most likely be prevalent within a democratic socialist society. If you want to ask how that mindset would be achieved In the majority of the population, that is a valid question to ask, but everything else you're doing is fucking stupid, anti-intellectual, and unintelligent. \n\nIt doesn't have a definition, it's a concept. I'm bringing it up because I know you're unfamiliar with the concept. And I defined it for you so you didn't have to look it up yourself. \n\n > It'd be like copy and pasting the theory of gravity to counter every argument.\n\nBut I'm not doing the things you say I am doing. Here, just snapchat me:\n\nNavydudeii on snapchat. We can break through this communication barrier in person.", "414" ], [ "> To be honest, I don't like adopting a singular noun to describe my politics, but I'm somewhat relieved <PERSON> does.\n\nEhh, I think this is kind of dumb. There IS A singular noun that will describe your politics, I just don't think you know what that is yet because you don't know enough yet. Once you do, you will know. Don't be one of those cowards hedging your bets \n\nI am a leftist because I am an economist and studying the economy you can see obvious contradictions with the economic system we are in like market failures which <PERSON> and his fans do not like to acknowledge. \n\nA KEY component of the free market capitalist system is FREE markets, but if the market is oligopolistic or monopolistic we have inefficiencies in that market and those inefficiencies need to be correct, but conservatives, which includes neoliberals economically, do not believe in REGULATION. They want to just deregulate everything forgetting about the concentration of power in certain markets.\n\n<PERSON> telecommunications Act of 1996 is a prime example of this as it relaxed media ownership and allowed conglomerates to consolidate the media industry into 6, NOW 5, firms! That is the nature of capitalism. It will ALWAYS do that lol. Did it 100 years ago, and we are dealing with it today.\n\n[Consider this video](_URL_0_)", "285" ], [ "> Destiny acknowledges a ton of market failures. He goes over the concept of an externality a lot.\n\nThere are not a \"ton of market failures,\" only 3. There are 5 market structures though. Market failures are not externalities, they're economic inefficiencies, and if Destiny truly acknowledged market failures and understood how to counter oligopoly, he wouldn't be championing a public option for Healthcare insurance financing instead of Medicare for all which turns the United States government into a monopsony in the Healthcare service and product markets to counterbalance oligopoly within those markets. Are you getting tired of discussing theory yet??? LOL\n\n > He also frequently critical of the short coming of capitalism.\n\nDoes he now? Like the fact Information media is able to be concentrated so you can trick half the voting populace? That is capitalism. Undemocratic. The goal of socialism is democracy. \n\n > You realize you can both be a capitalist and not a literal free market libertarian right?\n\nYes, <PERSON>, but Destiny argues like a neoliberal. The socialist critique of the capitalist system and its undemocratic nature IS correct.", "976" ], [ "> As others have noted, how likely is it that leftist will meaningfully become represented before severe market collapses and fascism rises?\n\nDemocratic socialism isn't going to happen tomorrow. Yesterday should have made that abundantly clear. Our society will evolve into it. China is pursuing their path to reach that goal, and we are pursuing ours. I think our path to that type of society will be harder because of the nature of our society and the egoism prevalent in our society, so this is a longterm project. You and I will not see the fruits of its labor. \n\n > All fascism (unregulated capitalism) needs is an uneducated public and an economic drought.\n\nLuckily we have democrats in power who believe in the power of government to stimulate the economy and who will stimulate the economy in effective ways \n\n\nGDP = C(onsumer) spending + I(nvestment) + G(overnment Spending) + (X[Ports] - M[Ports])\n\nConservatives typically like to increase GDP output by increasing I (through tax cuts) and G (Tax cuts increase government spending) which they think will translate to increase in C, but this is not the case and when they do this, they inflate the stock market (Stock buybacks). Neoliberals, the democrats that have been in power for the past 40 years, like to do the same, but this democratic party is now responding to backlash from the progressive movement so we should expect some bold fiscal policy coming from the <PERSON> administration so don't fret too much about fascists rise. There will be turmoil, but I think we're in for economic prosperity if the neoliberals adopt progressive policies. \n\n > I don't mean to be pessimistic, but don't you feel that a system (socialism) based on an economically superior system (capitalism) is very unlikely to arise, given our modern situation?\n\nSocialism is first and foremost about democracy. Capitalism is about Keeping, hierarchies (White supremacy), self-interest, wealth and asset accumulation. Market capitalism allows many negative externalities, like pollution, which decreases overall economic efficiency and quite frankly, destroy the planet in the process. \n\nUnder a market socialist system, the SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF POLLUTION IS NOT ZERO so there will be pollution, but under this system, the societal welfare is taken into account of market pricing decisions (Like a carbon tax). Right now, that is not the case because the goal of capitalism is profit for owners with no mention of giving back to the system. And the owners within these systems capture($$$) the regulators meant to regulate them. This is called regulatory capture. Dont worry man, we're on the path. Just takes time \n\nPeople really lack an imagination. Again, this will not be achieved in you or my lifetime, but we are on that path and need to continue to educate the populace and fight against misinformation and concentration of economic and political power.", "534" ], [ "> I'm sorry, I should specify, I feel leftism derives itself heavily from the preconditions of capitalism.\n\n\nSocial democracy is the next step in the evolution of the economic system of capitalism I believe. Democratic Socialism is the next evolutionary step after that. Leftism comes from a critique of the NEW (at the time) capitalist system so the ideology itself is relatively new to the human consciousnessand psyche, yes. <PERSON> predicted the failings of this system 150 years ago. It's plain to see.\n\nBut there have been socialist societies in the past, they just didn't have a name for it.", "285" ], [ "> Don't discount allies, simply because they don't share your particular ideology\n\nWell if they don't have a critique of capital within their political ideology I wouldn't really call them allies. If they're all \"Free market capitalism is the bestest system ever and western democracy blah blah blah\" I'm not allied with that. That's ideology and I don't align myself with dogmatic ideologues. \n\n > Where we find divergence, is where you assume we have that much time.\n\nI think <PERSON>'s little stunt bought us a lot of time with regard to preventing the rise of fascism. With regard to climate change, we really don't know. The future is unpredictable and the models are all over the place. All we know is warming is certain. But we don't know if humanity will develop a magical technology to pull CO2 from the atmosphere and oceans. We'll have to wait and see. We didn't know the green revolution would occur and the world was on the path to famines in the 1950s, but that did not happen. \n\n > Again, I don't think we fundamentally disagree.\n\nAs long as you're not married to any economic system and go with what works, we do not disagree. I'm not married to socialism and I know it isn't going to happen tomorrow so I try to understand the system I am in more clearly as well as come up with solutions from a socialist perspective, a democratic perspective, to make this system more democratic because it is inherently undemocratic.", "870" ], [ "> why seek the respect of people though?\n\n > to me the truth matters in the sense that the facts need to be established and the arguments thoroughly scrutinised to ensure they are coherent \n\n\nExactly. Going out of your way seeking the respect of people will lead to the relationship the corporate, neoliberal media has with white, authoritarian fascist <PERSON> voters. Because the media has been handling these people with kid gloves for decades, they do not know fact from fiction and are currently destroying the fabric of this society. \n\nSee what going along with just getting along can do? \n\nIf someone doesn't respect me for no reason at all, I'm certainly not going to go out of my way to beg them to", "30" ], [ "We need a revolution in this country, not the type of revolution that the <PERSON> tried to pull yesterday, but a social and economic revival. The labor market for tech jobs is highly concentrated so employers have the power to determine the price and supply of labor within the labor market, so your job is a cheap commodity to the purchaser of labor, and you may feel like you have the power to negotiate your salary, but it's all just an illusion. They're going to pay you what they're going to pay you and if you ask for anything more, they can find someone else. Coercive, to say the least since you have to eat the opportunity cost of finding a new jobs while trying to stay afloat financially is too high.", "28" ], [ "So he's not supposed to marry the woman he loves because.... she's rich? Makes sense, sport...\n\nAnd not even that she acquired that wealth, you want him to disassociate with the woman he loves because her father made that wealth and she may have inherited some of it.... strange critique.\n\n#Edit\n\nNo man, fuck that. I've read some of your posts, you're smarter than this. Why bring up superfluous information to slyly attack the man?", "797" ], [ "> have you got any evidence to show that <PERSON>'s record shows her support for the masses?\n\nHave you any evidence that the racist, white fascists who stormed the Capitol building yesterday would support my black ass, a member of the masses? LOL\n\n<PERSON> seems to think they'll do a better job than <PERSON> FOR ME than <PERSON> does FOR ME. I highly doubt that, but I'm not white so what the fuck do I know?\n\n > why does my comfort matter?\n\nYour comfort matters because you seem uncomfortable with people criticizing <PERSON>. Well now, <PERSON>, I'm going to be throwing bombs at <PERSON> for the rest of this year so maybe you'd be more comfortable in more conservative spaces 😉", "856" ], [ "You guys just did BREXIT. We're in a worse spot over here, but you guys are also in need of a revolution lol\n\nI'm not sure about the labor market situation in European Countries but I would imagine it's the same or worse since you guys actually respect labor rights, and with that comes protections from being fired which means higher wages and more demand for labor, but since there are not enough jobs, there is an oversupply of labor. Must be a lot of unemployment", "631" ], [ "> where have I been uncomfortable with people criticizing <PERSON>, what gives you that idea?\n\nWhy, right here in this comment thread, spooooort. You're defending <PERSON> so you must be uncomfortable with me critiquing him. Say, do I need to draw you a treasure map with crayon so you can follow the conclusions on your own? \n\n > if you want to support <PERSON>, you can do that, if you want to critique <PERSON>, you can do that too, it doesn't make me more or less comfortable\n\nThen stop playing captain-save-a-ho and leaving contrarian messages on this thread about the White supremacists who infiltrated the white house being equal in the level of badness to <PERSON>. \n\n > by the way I'm not white either, I get the impression you think I am white\n\nBy your nonchalant attitude at how these white, fascists tried to overrun our country yesterday and tried to initiate white, authoritarian Christian rule, you could have fooled me 🤷🏿‍♂️", "837" ], [ "> *Those two paragraphs have nothing to do with the original tweet or the reddit post. Do you understand that? *\n\nDo you understand that she's talking about the concentration of influence into the hands of a few and the effect that will have on society???? Which means she's talking about monopoly. Censorship of speech due to monopoly \n\nIf she thinks it is a free speech issue, it is not because these companies are private companies. We could argue it could be because of their role in society, but they are still private companies. \n\n > That’s not an answer to what i asked. I’m not confused about your opinion on these issues\n\nOh yes, you are deeply confused because I keep repeating the same thing over and over to you and you keep misunderstanding what is being written. That would point to you being confused. \n\n\nMarket failures due to market concentration are implicitly acknowledged by the Twitter poster even if she or you do not understand that the problem is related to that. \n\n > *“Then the market solution would be to break up these companies, wouldn’t it conservtards? But no, you guys don’t believe in government regulation so that’s a no no, right?\n\n > Can we bust it then? No? Let the market handle it, but... you know what, nevermind... It’s strange how conservatives understand market failures and concentration of market power when it suits them. Hmmmm”*\n\nThis original quote is my assuming that the chick is arguing that tech companies are too large and have outsized influence in our society. Even if she isn't a conservative and that isn't her actual critique, the PROBLEM is what I outlined it to be: monopoly.\n\nThe original quote, from me, is me just being sarcastic and acting like I am speaking to a conservative. It's a joke, but it still speaks to the illogical nature of conservatives. They claim they don't want government regulations, but when it suits them, they'll complain about things that require governments regulations like concentrated power of firms in markets. The most funny part of the joke is they're willing to complain about shit, but not seek out economically efficient solutions.", "106" ], [ "Well, they're mistaken and he fought as hard as he could for Greece, but in the end the President surrendered their sovereignty, not <PERSON>. <PERSON> Resigned\n\n > until I actually met Greek leftists who looked at me like I glorifying <PERSON>.\n\n<PERSON>? Give me a break. Maybe Greek leftists are reactionary types like <PERSON>?", "533" ], [ "> Syriza is not the end all be all discussion of Leftist politics in Greece.\n\nWell, that was one of the biggest events in Greek history so I thought perhaps their disillusionment came from that, but you're not doing me any favors not revealing what the critique is other than his wife is rich. Not a critique and vapid as fuck. \n\n<PERSON>? Give me a break. Maybe Greek leftists are reactionary types like <PERSON>?\n\n > Again, you're just talking superficially.\n\nI hadn't realized I was talking \"superficially\" before.\n\n > until I actually met Greek leftists who looked at me like I glorifying <PERSON>.\n\n<PERSON>? Give me a break. Maybe Greek leftists are reactionary types like <PERSON>? Just because people are on the left, doesn't mean they can't be fucking idiots", "965" ], [ "> yeah ad hominem definitely a sign of intelligent discussion, I'll be sure to remember that\n\nDo you realize that I used the ad hominem once you started saying really stupid shit like Nazis are socialists because \"they have socialism in their name\"? This is Destiny-fan level logic\n\n\"Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea is Democratic guys, they said so so it must be true.\"\n\nThis is the level of stupidity I'm dealing with, so...\n\nIf you're a kid, I will forgive you and take you under my wing educating on these topics, but if you're a grown ass man/woman we're going to have to part ways, and yes, you are a fucking idiot. I don't educate adults anymore; you're on your own", "743" ], [ "> HOW WOULD BREAKING UP FACEBOOK CHANGE THEIR ABILITY TO CENSOR?????\n\nFacebook is a PRIVATE company. They are allowed to do what they want on their platform so a private company blocking someone who has signed the facebook TOS and is using their service is not a problem. \n\nI have already answered this, too. The ability to censor is not the problem, not having access to the public square after being banned is. But you are not entitled access to the services of these private platforms just like you are not entitled service to a private business when you are not wearing a mask. You cannot yell fire in a theater. There are limits to speech and there are limits to speech within a private space. \n\nMy break up scenario breaks facebook and Instagram up and merges whatsapp and Instagram into a single company, so if she's blocked on one service, she has access to the other and before they merged, facebook and Instagram were in competition with one another. Again, \"censorship\" is not an issue as facebook is a private company and private companies do not have to let you use their platform if you violate their REASONABLE terms of service. The terms of service are subject to State and local laws.\n\nI have written this same thing out like 3 times. Did you get it this time??? Lol\n\nCENSORSHIP IS NOT AN ISSUE!!!!!!!! IT IS NOT CENSORSHIP IF A PRIVATE COMPANY does not want to do business with you, it is a business decision.", "106" ], [ "> But it is ridiculous to read the reddit post/tweet and start talking about breaking up companies. it’s illogical. \n \nThat's what you do when companies have to much market share power, dude. And the subject of her complaint was the power of tech. It is perfectly logical to break up an industry that has too much power within a market. This isn't rocket science. \n\n\n > However, now I FINALLY understand that your proposed solution involves the weird breakup/merger stuff. there’s only one problem.... FACEBOOK WOULD STILL EXIST AS A SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM EXACTLY HOW IT DOES TODAY.\n\nWith one more competitor it didn't have yesterday. \n\n\n > YOUR BREAKUP MERGER SOLUTION DOES NOTHING TO ADRESS THE MADE UP PROBLEM THE IDIOT TWEETED. NOTHING.\n\nIt gives her one more option of a social media platform. That's all we can really do at this point. A competitor that is just as popular. But her being banned isn't really a problem, so she should just read the terms of service to avoid being banned. \n\nI addressed her problem", "106" ], [ "> But demand would meet supply bro. People can only eat so many groceries.\n\nIf the checks were monthly, more people would be buying more stuff. The producers of stuff have to produce more stuff to meet demand, but we're in a global pandemic so we can't produce more supply to meet demand. In this case we get too many people chasing too few goods which is demand-pull inflation. The price rises because of scarcity. \n\nYou don't think people are rationing food purchases right now?", "73" ], [ "Not just food, dude. Just one of many goods.\n\n[Demand-pull inflation under <PERSON>_)\n\nAnd the [liquidity trap](_URL_1_) \n\n > Corporations and their owners would rise to the challenge of taking everyone's extra $2000 without a doubt.\n\nYeah, it doesn't work that way. And since a lot of these corporations are monopolies within their respective markets, there are market inefficiencies, like artificially low production level of goods. So there would most certainly be scarcity and demand pull inflation.\n\nAnd 120k just lost their jobs.", "73" ], [ "What about the liquidity trap? May as well try though, right? We are in unprecedented times worldwide.\n\n*“My overall assessment is that, while we can never have complete certainty, negative interest rates should with high likelihood boost UK growth and inflation. Cutting bank rate to its record low of 0.1% has helped loosen lending conditions relative to the counterfactual (of no policy change), and I believe further cuts would continue to provide stimulus*", "73" ], [ "Do not compare any leftwing movements to rightwing movements because the ORIGINATING PREMISE( Stolen elections) of the rightwing movement is based on a lie. If there was a day where the shit hits the fan, the left needs to be ready for that, so your premise just falls flat because we do not organize based on lies; if something happened to rally leftwing people up to the point that violent revolution DOES become the only option, it will have to be something very BAD. \n\nWe aren't there yet, but we don't know the future. Nuance\n\nFor now, work within the system to spread democratic ideas until we reach such a point where electoral politics is no longer an option. Why is EVERYONE so extreme???? Pragmatism", "965" ], [ "> Do you like actually watch Destiny's content?\n\nYes \n\n > For the most part he's not arguing with random slightly left-leaning people, it's typically extremists who's views sit outside the overton window.\n\nI know, but you guys need to keep in mind you're on the internet. Keep that perspective. It's funny to laugh at the extremists, but remember most people don't know anything about... anything lol", "965" ], [ "> Defund the police means abolish the police to most people which is why people need to stop saying it.\n\nLOL defunding something isn't the same thing as getting rid of it. If this bullshit was correct, people would think DEFUNDING SCHOOLS, which is how lawmakers phrase it, would be getting rid of schools.\n\nWhen you reallocate equipment these municipalities received from the federal government, you are defunding the police.", "582" ], [ "> 2) The vast majority of black people live in the areas you are so frightened of \n\nI know and they get shot a lot. \n\n\n > 1.a) There's a difference between a southern town of 1200 pop and a southern city of 1-5 million pop.\n\nSure \n\n\n > 3) The LAPD unironically unjustly kills more black people than any other major metro in the country.\n\nThat is besides the point. \n\n > 1) Nearly every single city in America leans very blue and is fine and modern. Obviously there's some outliers like Flint, but it's not like Kansas City or Cleveland or Omaha or Atlanta or Charleston are some backwater shitholes. \"CA & NY good everywhere else bad\" is unironically a privileged take, and obviously one from someone who's never actually traveled anywhere.\n\nStrawman arguments........", "276" ], [ "> \"You shouldn't be entitled to live in a specific place forever just because you were born there or were there first.\"\n\nWhy not?\n\n\n > It's the same reason we had that multi-week long arc with <PERSON> about how the Canadian gov't should go ahead and force the wet'suwet'en people off their land for the pipeline, even though \"their land is a part of their culture\".\n\nWell, when you're forcing people off their land so you can make a profit, that's pretty exploitative is it not? \n\n > You're not entitled to (morally) horde a piece of land in perpetuity just because you were randomly born there.\n\nWhy not? Don't you guys believe in private property? Then are you not (morally) entitled to horde private property into perpetuity just because you were randomly born with an extraordinary amount of it compared to everyone else? For the societal good, people should be forced to give up their own property if that's your logic.\n\n#Edit \n\nI guess Destiny hasn't programmed the answer to this question into your brain yet 😏", "1013" ], [ "> The first definition I see when looking up defund is \"prevent from receiving funds\".\n\nPrevention from receiving funds doesn't equal the organization being abolished. \n\n > So yes, under a definition of absolutely means abolish the police.\n\nIncorrect, look above. \n\n > However, that's not even the main argument. My point is that most Americans hear defund and think that means \"prevent from continuing to receive funds\" and therefore abolition. Why the fuck would you have a slogan where you have to take ten minutes to explain that it doesn't actually mean what it sounds like? \n\nIt doesn't take 10 minutes to explain, I could explain what defund the police means in 2 minutes to someone as long as that person is educated and reasonable enough to listen. If not, then you're right. We have to meet people where they are, but we shouldn't cater to ignorance as a society. \n\n > There's a reason defund the police polls horribly and an explanation where you reallocate funds to social services polls extremely well\n\nIt doesn't poll well because most people haven't done the research on it. We live in a supposedly democratic system so the people in it are going to have to act like adults and understand these arguments themselves. Also, we have a media problem in this country where extraordinarily wealthy individuals are able to control the societal narrative, so it doesn't even matter if you coddle these people's ignorance, they are never going to be for change. I focus on reasonable people and don't pay attention to fools. \n\n > It's the worst slogan I've ever heard. It's as if the Republicans came up with it as a way to attack police reform.\n\nIt's the worst slogan you ever heard because you are uneducated, using Slippery slopes and think defunding will result in abolishment which is a Slippery slopes. We defund schools all the time and we call it defunding of schools. I think we just need more educated, rational people because we are failing at the moment when we have to cater to stupidity and ignorance", "582" ], [ "> Define \"a lot\". The phrase \"a lot\" is so insanely meaningless.\n\n > Btw, the 4 highest states for hate crime are CA, NY, WA, and NJ. That doesn't mean hate crime doesn't happen elsewhere, but it's just really stupid to act like anywhere outside of the coasts is a warzone for black people. Just own you wanna live in a trendy city.\n\nI don't care about the absolute number of hate crimes in a state, I care about the Hate crimes per capita. Sure there might be a lot of hate crimes in California, but 38 million people live in California. Critical analysis. \n\n[Hate Crimes Per Capita](_URL_0_)", "276" ], [ "> I'm sorry eliminating child poverty isn't bold enough to you, I'm sure you would do far more if you became President with all of the elected lawmaking experience you surely have.\n\nLOL earned income tax credits and all that other bullshit is not bold enough to \"end childhood poverty\" lol. That is my point. It is NOT bold enough.\n\nI may not be a lawmaker, but I understand the system we exist In and I study economic systems lol. EITC ain't shit\n\nHere, read [POOR ECONOMICS](_URL_0_) by <PERSON> and <PERSON>. You'll understand what I'm saying. I don't have time to outline that book", "817" ], [ "> If the police no longer receive funds, they are abolished. This is so fucking dumb dude <PERSON>.\n\nAlright, here you are showing your ignorance so I need you to slow down, listen, and then think about what I'm writing, ok?\n\nSo you're a municipal police department. You received new equipment that is outside your budget from the federal government. You do not have the funds to manage these newly added assets now on your balance sheet so what do you do? You lobby the city for more money. So what happens if a movement happens that wants to demilitarize those police departments? Well, those departments will have to return those assets to the federal government, and because they no longer have those assets on their balance sheet, and have no need to maintain those assets, the city can reallocate those funds to less productive areas of the city's budget. That is LITERALLY defunding the police. \n\nAre we on the same page now, or are you going to carry on with the Slippery slopes? It just takes a little education which I am finding the majority of people lack. If I don't understand something, I don't shut down and blame the people trying to explain something to me, I try to understand their arguments and where they are coming from. I think we need more of that as a society and less bad faith arguments, like you're doing here, and logical fallacies, like you're doing here. \n\nDefunding something does not have to result in the eventual abolishment of that thing. I mean it CAN, but it DOES NOT HAVE TO and I think reasonable, well-educated people who understand that the word \"defund\" does not necessarily mean \"abolish\" will understand the points I am trying to make.\n\nAlso, the idea that we have to rephrase our slogans to cater to \"polite society\" comes from the idea that police organizations around the country are beloved by the populace. I think after January 6th, 2021 and <PERSON> that attitude has shifted considerably and will continue to shift as officers may have aided an insurrection in our nation's Capitol. There is going to be a PURGE and defundment anyway so the left already won and this conversation is superfluous. \n\n > Voters don't do research, lol. Maybe 1% to be generous. Any strategy that relies on that will laughably fail. \n\nSo cater to voter ignorance and don't try to become a more perfect union and democracy? No, I am going to put the impetus on people to do their research and I am not going to back away from that. We can't have a democratic society without more people paying attention. We almost lost the country as we know it the other day so it is time for people to wake up and start participating in the process. We can't cater to ignorance any longer. \n\n > I'll ignore ad hom and media conspiracy weirdness\n\nMedia conspiracy weirdness? Wow, are you REALLY this ignorant? So you're lack of knowledge stems from WILFULL ignorance. The rightwing media apparatus in this country disseminates misinformation to the masses and the reason that is a thing is because the telecommunications act of 1996. This is not a \"conspiracy theory\". You just don't know enough and you can't see outside your own ego to understand that. This is arrogance not intelligence, and it is Trumpian as well. \n \nGo read [Dark Money](_URL_0_) by <PERSON>, or if you don't read, watch an interview. \n\nDunning-Kruger is on full display here, and I see that it is a problem in the community. Don't worry though, I'm here to correct that.", "582" ], [ "Escaping poverty can be likened to escaping the Earth's gravitational force. You need a certain velocity of money or you will be stuck in or around the outer edges of poverty. The FED's goal to keep interest rates at around 2% for the past 45 years has also contributed to bad policies that keep people in poverty: Wage Stagnation. \n\nWithout bold plans we aren't ending SHIT, HOMMIESSSSS LOL🤣🤣🤣🤣. It is important to critique stuff like this. \n\nFor instance, We haven't had wage-push employment in decades and are not likely to any time soon.  You only get inflation when wages are growing for most people.  So we could have an economy where wages for those with mid-to-lower end wages rise 4% / year with overall inflation of 3%, so mid-to-low real incomes grow 1% per year.  *Yet the Fed's policy has been to cap inflation at 2% with nominal wages (for most) also rising at just 2%, so stagnant in real terms, over decades now*!!! So Fed policy effectively prevents people *around and below the median income level ever having real income gains*. In other words, stagnant real incomes are an *objective* \n\nPart of the agenda has to be about wages as well, or EITC will only do so much, ya know. Will it reduce poverty? Yes, but we can ELIMINATE childhood poverty altogether by 2030 with bold action. I will await their agenda.", "954" ], [ "> But you can still compare them.\n\nYou can, but you're not going to get any valid, useful conclusions out of that. We compare things that are comparable so we can know what works and what does not work. For example, we had a lot of Race and IQ studies in the past where researcher were making comparison between groups of people, but not accounting for certain variables. This resulted in flawed IQ studies rightwingers like to cite even to this day to promote the idea that no amount of government spending will result in reducing the achievement gap within our society. \"They're too dumb to achieve success, so don't waste money on them\". That's just one example of the dangers of comparing things that are not representative to the things they are being compared to. In this case, black children in the United States vs White children in the United States. You can CERTAINLY compare the two in 1980s, but you wouldn't really get any useful results from the comparison because of a multitude of societal and socioeconomic factors. \n\n If things are comparable, we can hold all conditions the same -- Ceterus Paribus -- and understand what works and what does not work when making comparisons between two things. \n\nThis has to do with related rates of change in differential calculus. In econometrics, we compare similar things because dissimilar things are not representative of the things we are trying to make comparisons of. \n\nSay, is this a <PERSON> argument?\n\nYou guys need to study statistics, and econometrics. Only someone who has NEVER studied statistics would say that we SHOULD (of course we CAN) compare things that are not REPRESENTATIVE of the things they are being compared to. It's ILLOGICAL.\n\nStop repeating <PERSON> talking points. You can compare apples and oranges, BUT THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING LOL.... \n\nYou CAN do anything you want, but that doesn't make the thing you are doing USEFUL and worth your time, and it is besides the point because I am not talking about what you CAN do, I am talking about what you SHOULD do. Opportunity cost. While your comparing things that shouldn't be compared, you COULD have been comparing things that are comparable for real answers to the questions you have.", "76" ], [ "> Again, people vote with their feet. I mean maybe immigrants and their families have stupidly chosen the 34th out of 35th country to raise a family in for the last half century\n\nYou say this with ZERO self-awareness. Why yes, after January 6th I would say that immigrants and their families have STUPIDLY chosen the 34th out of 35th place to raise their children. Yeah, the future of our country is looking bleak at the moment and we do not reinvest in our children's futures like a lot of other countries. We are falling behind and instead of acknowledging that, you're bringing up our glory days....\n\n > Yes, and America has by far the highest amount of international immigration since 1970. It's foreign born population has more than quadrupled since that date, showing just how many have come to seek opportunities\n\nAnd wages have also been stagnant for the upper-middle, middle, and lower classes of American society. People who make right around the median wage are stuck there it would seem from the data. Americans in 1973 had the same buying power as Americans in 2018.\n\nAlso, you do know the capitalist system exploits people for their labor so it requires \"international immigrants\" to sustain itself just like it required my African ancestors to \"immigrate\" here as Conservatives euphemistically like to refer to it. People are immigrating back to Mexico by the way", "113" ], [ "> The state doesn’t react differently based on whether or not your position is “true”. It acts based on whether or not it is threatened.\n\nTrue, but we aren't in the 1950s, and THE STATE is no longer run by white, American fascists. In fact, I think THE STATE is about to purge some white, American fascists from employment. The Capitol Hill attack was even more violent and even more of a conspiracy than we thought. Stay tuned.\n\nAnd the scenario I outlined in the response above, there would be a massive uprising so the \"truth\" would be the fact that the majority of the citizens are uprising. We are not there, and I don't believe we will ever be there, but if we are the \"OBJECTIVE TRUTH\" will be on our side which will make it hard for the State to crush such an uprising.\n\nThe Russian Revolution is an example of this in semi-modern times.", "725" ], [ "Well then we just raise taxes and interest rates. We know how to deal with stagflation which was in the 70s and early 80s, not 60s. We had SLIGHT demand-pull inflation from LBJ's great society program in the 60s, but stagflation in the 70s was because of OPEC and bad monetary policy. The bad monetary policy being the trigger that made it last so long. <PERSON> made <PERSON> increase the money supply in 1971. <PERSON> suggested raising taxes to control the price level and the rest is history: Austerity Politics to control the threat of inflation for the past 40 years\n\n<PERSON> was right, but only because <PERSON> was wrong. And the leftwing of this country paid for failed conservative fiscal and monetary policies. Democrats were blamed by the Reagan Administration for creating \"welfare queens\" with our social programs in the 60s. And people still to this day believe it. The conservative propaganda is strong in this country. \n\n#The era of Big government is over \n~Bill <PERSON>", "73" ], [ "They are probably talking about the fact that intersex (Not transgender) people exist and sex is a spectrum. I'm sure you have all met guys that were \"born gay\". They're still guys, but they're very what people would consider \"effeminate\" because sex IS a spectrum. That was not a value judgement either. Tribal people figured this shit out a LOOOOONG time ago\n\nIn some tribes or cultures, not all men are \"considered\" to be men. They have rites of passage FOR MEN for a REASON in these societies. Don't they teach you guys this in school? All of this stems from randomness with regard to how our genetics mutate.\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if this phenomenon exists in ALL placental mammals at the very least.\n\n[There are more human sexes than 2](_URL_0_)\n\n[Binary Data in statistics](_URL_1_)\n\n[Dichotomization](_URL_2_)", "654" ], [ "> It would probably be a myriad of factors I’d imagine.\n\nNo, just one: WOMEN TAKE CARE OF CHILDREN generally speaking. Especially poor women.\n\nMen do not. This is disastrous.\n\n > But 100% is an insane number and it’s hard to think it’s true based off of a cropped Twitter screenshot\n\n\n[The US lost 140,000 jobs in December, ALL OF THEM WERE WOMEN](_URL_0_)\n\n*Blacks and Latinas lost jobs in December, while White women made significant gains*", "867" ], [ "No, because there was no election fraud. You don't debate things were the original premise is false. That would be the waste of everyone's time and that would be empowering that false narrative. <PERSON> himself doesn't even believe he won, so why should any RATIONAL human being. Keyword: RATIONAL\n\nThis is why I have trouble with people \"debating\" whether the planet is flat. Well, our laws of physics would not work as we currently know them to work if the planet was flat. That is all i am ever willing to get into with someone about that. It is on them to learn math and understand what I mean lol", "210" ], [ "> Less than 2% fall under this condition as stated in the video.\n\nAnd what did the video say 2% of the total WORLD population is? That's 160 million people, a population the size of a top 10 nation as the video states. So you're saying we should ignore the fact that those people exist?\n\nBlack people are only 13% of the US population, ~45 million. Are you saying because we are so few, we shouldn't be acknowledged? Natives are even less. Do we not account for these people?", "818" ], [ "> This video is saying that 2% of people have different sexed portions of their body than their assumed sex, but doesn't mean \"completely different 3rd sex\". It is so obscure and inconsequential that in the video the guy claims that commonly enough people never know.\n\n\n\"For something to be binary, the variable must be dichotomous i.e. can only be one of two possibles values. *Whether a value is rare has no bearing on whether a variable is binary or not*\"\n\n[Binary Data In statistics](_URL_0_)\n\nI forgot most people know shit-all about statistics so I need to stop assuming they do and define what words mean.", "654" ], [ "> Yeah, it's been fucking awful... just building the best economy in the world. It feels awful to have a tech sector that makes Europe's tech sector look like child's play. \n\nThat has nothing to do with anything I have said and wages have been stagnant for everyone except top earners since the 1970s. Thank you for proving my point. \n\n > It's terrible being a destination that people want to immigrate to to start businesses and create societal value. \n\nIn a recent ranking of OECD nations, the United States ranked 34 out of 35 on places to raise your children so it would seem to me a lot of people are falling for the propaganda, including you. Since the 1970s, wages in State Capitalist China have QUADRUPLED meanwhile the Average American in 1973 had the purchasing power of the Average American in 2018. Your indicators are only displaying how unequal our society has become and because you have bought into the nationalistic, Trumpian propaganda, your going to defend the United States uncritically. \n\n\n > Even <PERSON> a moderate is going this way and he hasn't used a terrible economic period as justification to avoid talking about raising taxes and the minimum wage. At least our businesses are such global leaders that the policy will quite possibly be viable at this point\n\nThose policies have ALWAYS been viable which is why the US and China have pulled MILLIONS of people out of poverty which such policies. \n\n > But most likely we are about to over swing the pendulumn just like we did in the <PERSON> and post-Reagan period.\n\nIt wasn't an over swing of the pendulum, it was SHORT TERM monetary and fiscal policy to WIN AN ELECTION IN 1971, that fucked everyone over for a decade, and conservatives used that bullshit to blame the social programs of the 1960s. The problem that caused stagflation was and will always be a raise in the price level of energy products, and luckily the energy market isn't as concentrated as it was in the 70s, and too much people chasing too few goods. Couple that with a recession and you have stagflation and 5 decades of conservative propaganda and lies... as they always do", "841" ], [ "> And what do you think <PERSON> just did for the Georgia runoffs - hey we will give you $2k if you vote Democrat. \n\n$2000 checks isn't going to cause INFLATION, dude. <PERSON>. It's means tested as well. Everyone isn't getting it. Do you even know what CAUSES inflation? Demand-pull Inflation will only happen if EVERYONE'S wages increase at the same time \n\n > The funny thing is you accuse me off being partisan and <PERSON> propagandist but you are so far into believing in what you believe in that you don't realize I'm a full on moderate.\n\nThr moderates POLICIES have led to <PERSON> and the level of inequality we are experiencing. I don't understand how you aren't connecting all these connected elements.\n\n > <PERSON> to compare an emerging economy to an already industrialized one. \n\nTrue, then let's compare the rate of China's industrialization and rise, to our rate when we were developing. It has been extraordinary.", "73" ], [ "> This is the actual survey, they took data only from OECD countries \n\nYes because when comparing apples, you compare them to other apples even though there are some Oranges in there like Chile. The fact that we rank lower than Chile for places to raise children should be troubling \n\n > and it might be important to note that the only stat weighted differently is pollution at .5 with everything else being weighted at 1.\n\n\nThey are all Organization of Economic Countries and Development (OECD) countries, that is why. They are supposed to be similar in all of those categories except population. Advanced, modern economies \n\n > More importantly there is some deceptive shit in there like school shootings being weighed as heavily as homicides per 100,000 and human rights scores.\n\n[School Shootings are rare; our reaction to them are causing more harm than good](_URL_0_)\n\nI would assume school shootings and homicides per 100,000 are weighted as heavily as each other because of the traumatic cost these events have on the children within our society. \n\n\n > I'm not saying the authors are grifters I'm just saying that this makes it somewhat easier to attack.\n\nWe would have to understand their reasoning first before you attacked. They probably know better than we do so send them an email.", "519" ], [ "Nah, it's just capitalism. We've had a history of defending Muslims against adversaries we are enemies with (Afghanistan/Bosnia/etc), but we just aren't enemies with China. They make our cheap shit, and because they have economic power, we can't tell them to do shit. <PERSON>'s dumb ass placed tariffs on Chinese goods, and we have paid the price because we buy those tariffed goods lol. I am also noticing slight inflation in [food prices](_URL_0_) when I went to the store today so that's a bitch as well.", "745" ], [ "Absolutely no similarities between the position <PERSON> and <PERSON> were in and the position <PERSON> was in. She was a captive of an enemy country. <PERSON> was about to be sold into sex slavery and <PERSON> was about to be murdered. Once the guy was knocked unconscious, continuing to wail on him with a brick is unnecessary which is why I hate <PERSON>. <PERSON> was justified in murdering the slave traders who murdered her parents and were going to sell her. Even <PERSON> told <PERSON> that was unnecessary and she tried to justify it by saying they were going to kill them anyway which is not true; they were POWs. \n\n > Some similarities there to <PERSON>'s flashback later in the episode.\n\n<PERSON>'s flashback was in reference to the little girl she saved in Season 1 and they are comparing <PERSON> Saving the little girl to <PERSON>. <PERSON>'s flashback was not referencing nor does it make sense to reference <PERSON>'s current position.\n\nPay attention", "475" ], [ "> Conflating? <PERSON> shouldn’t have been putting anyone in cages\n\nWhy not? If you go to another country illegally they'll put you in a cell lol. This is a nonsense argument and the President of the United State's number 1 job is foreign policy. Go read the constitution. \n\n > Don’t matter who.\n\nSure it does. Putting people who break the law, that would be illegally crossing the border without a valid excuse, in prison is not the same thing as locking up UN recognized refugees and separating them from their children. You are definitely conflating two different issues and making The Obama administration out to what it isn't. \n\nThe Obama administration also only deported FELONS and RECENT ARRIVALS to the United States which is why it deported over 3 million people within a span of 8 years. There's a difference between deporting people who have been here all their lives and deporting someone who has been here a few months or even a few years and if you can't understand that, you are an extremist LOL...", "796" ], [ "> I just personally think we need work toward a world with out boarders man. I\n\nWell, we don't live in that world and why does the United States have to be the country that experiments with open borders first? Let some other country do it. We have laws for a reason and until we put regulations on the book to make immigration open, we do not have open borders. \n\n > Who did these people hurt?\n\nIt doesn't matter about who they hurt. It's a Slippery slope, and perhaps this practice hurts the very people it is trying to help which is why immigration should be regulated and reformed like drugs. Just openly allowing it without regulations is dangerous and breeds all types of criminal activity like sexual assault and slavery. \n\n > Yes maybe the criminals could have but in general if you made it here illegally you didn’t hurt anyone\n\nSlippery slope and then what do we say to the people who DO hurt someone and weren't supposed to be here in the first place? We should definitely know WHO is coming into this country for all of our sakes. \n\n > So in my opinion it’s a victimless crime and victimless crimes do not deserve being locked up. I guess I’m an extremist. 😂\n\nYes, you are definitely an extremist. Your position is an EXTREME. and I answered above why it is not a victimless crime and why the activity breeds criminal activity.\n\nEven with open borders, we would have to know the people coming and going into this region. And then 2020 should have enlightened you to the fact that there are diseases people carry and letting people across borders untouched is a great way to spread those diseases. And no, this is not a \"dirty immigrant\" critique, this is just true. Are people coming from those countries even vaccinated like we are? These are questions that extremists like you do not consider", "799" ], [ "> So do you just have a fear of the other? I’m trying to extrapolate.\n\nI have a fear of bad policy or no policy leading to bad outcomes. \n\n > I prefer to assume people are good and if they are bad there is usually a reason behind it.\n\nAnd that is why we TRUST but verify people. \n\n > I dunno I guess I’m just so extreme to think that most people are good people and that we should treat each other as such.\n\nYeah, this is pretty extremist. Normal people trust, but verify instead of openly trusting whatever comes at them. \n\n\nWell, we don't live in that world and why does the United States have to be the country that experiments with open borders first? Let some other country do it. We have laws for a reason and until we put regulations on the book to make immigration open, we do not have open borders. \n\n > Who did these people hurt?\n\nIt doesn't matter about who they hurt. It's a Slippery slope, and perhaps this practice hurts the very people it is trying to help which is why immigration should be regulated and reformed like drugs. Just openly allowing it without regulations is dangerous and breeds all types of criminal activity like sexual assault and slavery. \n\n > Yes maybe the criminals could have but in general if you made it here illegally you didn’t hurt anyone\n\nSlippery slope and then what do we say to the people who DO hurt someone and weren't supposed to be here in the first place? We should definitely know WHO is coming into this country for all of our sakes. \n\n > So in my opinion it’s a victimless crime and victimless crimes do not deserve being locked up. I guess I’m an extremist. 😂\n\nYes, you are definitely an extremist. Your position is an EXTREME. and I answered above why it is not a victimless crime and why the activity breeds criminal activity.\n\nEven with open borders, we would have to know the people coming and going into this region. And then 2020 should have enlightened you to the fact that there are diseases people carry and letting people across borders untouched is a great way to spread those diseases. And no, this is not a \"dirty immigrant\" critique, this is just true. Are people coming from those countries even vaccinated like we are? These are questions that extremists like you do not consider", "799" ], [ "> Do you realize that you just sound like you fear immigrants? We have shit immigration laws. \n\nWhat does that have to do with the fact that LAWS still need to exist and the movement of people STILL needs to be heavily regulated for the health of ALL people??? No, I sound like a person with a brain who understands that people cannot move across regions uninhibited especially during a global pandemic.\n\n\n > We do shit things to people who are just being coaxed into the American dream. \n\nAnd?\n\n > I don’t know why we can’t slowly work toward a better world. Instead we have to sit here and discuss whether or not it is ok to put people in cages.\n\nIt's not even up to discussion. It is a FACT that a sovereign country is allowed to choose how it wants people to immigrate into it. My position is immigration should be open and regulated and your position is let's just let everyone be free! Lol. You're an extremist. \n\n > So do you just have a fear of the other? I’m trying to extrapolate.\n\nI have a fear of bad policy or no policy leading to bad outcomes. \n\n > I prefer to assume people are good and if they are bad there is usually a reason behind it.\n\nAnd that is why we TRUST but verify people. \n\n > I dunno I guess I’m just so extreme to think that most people are good people and that we should treat each other as such.\n\nYeah, this is pretty extremist. Normal people trust, but verify instead of openly trusting whatever comes at them. \n\n\nWell, we don't live in that world and why does the United States have to be the country that experiments with open borders first? Let some other country do it. We have laws for a reason and until we put regulations on the book to make immigration open, we do not have open borders. \n\n > Who did these people hurt?\n\nIt doesn't matter about who they hurt. It's a Slippery slope, and perhaps this practice hurts the very people it is trying to help which is why immigration should be regulated and reformed like drugs. Just openly allowing it without regulations is dangerous and breeds all types of criminal activity like sexual assault and slavery. \n\n > Yes maybe the criminals could have but in general if you made it here illegally you didn’t hurt anyone\n\nSlippery slope and then what do we say to the people who DO hurt someone and weren't supposed to be here in the first place? We should definitely know WHO is coming into this country for all of our sakes. \n\n > So in my opinion it’s a victimless crime and victimless crimes do not deserve being locked up. I guess I’m an extremist. 😂\n\nYes, you are definitely an extremist. Your position is an EXTREME. and I answered above why it is not a victimless crime and why the activity breeds criminal activity.\n\nEven with open borders, we would have to know the people coming and going into this region. And then 2020 should have enlightened you to the fact that there are diseases people carry and letting people across borders untouched is a great way to spread those diseases. And no, this is not a \"dirty immigrant\" critique, this is just true. Are people coming from those countries even vaccinated like we are? These are questions that extremists like you do not consider", "799" ], [ "> At what point did I give a policy to be dubbed bad.\n\nOpen, unregulated borders, which you are suggesting, is bad policy. \n\n > I was actually calling out a bad policy. \n\nAnd suggesting even worse policy: unregulated, open crossing into the United States \n\n > The bad policy I don’t put people in cages. \n\nIf you illegally immigrate into Canada, or even Mexico, they're going to jail you. Not an argument. You want the United States to unilaterally change its immigration policy for no other reason than your own feelings LOL. \n\n > Radical idea too I don’t think cells should be a thing in jail.\n\nDefinitely a radical idea. Why don't you go visit one of those jails. Maybe you'll change your mind. There are humans that are animals and you can't change them. Im glad you've never met one, but they're out there and we lock them up. If you want to advocate for murderers, rapists, and thieves, go be a lawyer.", "799" ], [ "> I didn’t say anything about unregulated borders. I said we should have open borders. You inferred the no regulation.\n\nWell, you're advocating for people who are breaking laws not to be imprisoned so that is unregulated border crossing you're calling for at this very moment. \n\n > Also I was referring to prisons like the ones in Germany and such. People can rehabilitated.\n\nDifferent society, Different societal attitudes. 1 out of 5 American adults has some kind of mental illness. There's something in the water here (not literally). \n\n > You just seem to think some people are too broken to fix or not worth fixing.\n\nIt's an opportunity cost. You can waste millions of dollars trying to \"fix\" someone in their 30s who is set in their ways, or you can invest that money elsewhere, maybe in the upcoming generation, so you don't get people like this in your society in the first place. It's a calculation that needs to be made, and I am willing to make it. You are not. That is why everyone cannot be a leader.", "651" ], [ "Dang bro, we can't do anything with you can we? We can't imprison people for a very short term for breaking immigration law. You don't even want rapists or murderers locked up. The President can't do his job and enforce the borders of this country. The President is also not allowed to create temporary holding facilities at the border for individuals who break the law. What the FUCK are we allowed to do in your imagery world because right now, it seems like extremists like you would tie our hands on enacting action on ANYTHING. \n\nSo to clarify. The United States is not allowed to enforce its own laws like the rest of the world or it will make YOU feel bad. The United States is not allowed to lock up people for a temporary amount of time or it will make YOU feel bad. The United States doesn't seem like it's allowed to do ANYTHING or it might make you feel bad... I don't think your feelings are the principle we should be organizing policy or our society around. Fuck your feelings.", "796" ], [ "Like I said, women will be the leaders of this new movement and we should want it to be that way in order for it to be successful. People like AOC are the future of the democratic party. Strange how this has been downvoted though 🤔\n\nAffirmative action posts LOL. I guess we don't talk about intersectionality over here anymore. You sound like you watch Secular talk or <PERSON> 🤣🤣", "497" ], [ "> Yes, and the traditional response to a wannabe badass boasting in the internet is, jokingly, to reference one of the r/iamverybadass subs.. You are such a tough guy; you won't bend, you'll just snap in half.\n\nAwwww, are you here to save <PERSON> from little ol' me? Well that's sweet of ya. I love the fact that this person with a \"savoir complex\" just got on my post to complain about me \"acting like a tough guy\" like my behavior has anything to do with them. Was there anything else, sugar tits?", "730" ], [ "> <PERSON> has already promised to pass new domestic terrorism laws when in office\n\nAnd <PERSON> and other progressives have promised to vote against anything increasing the power of the State. Maybe YOU Try following the news. Do you even understand how Bills get passed? <PERSON> isn't a fucking king you CHILD. Learn the process.", "850" ], [ "> You accused me of being racist before you called <PERSON> fans “sewer rats,”\n\nDon't forget I called <PERSON> one as well. Is <PERSON> even Jewish? Lol\n\n > a common anti-Semitic trope.\n\nI don't think \"sewer rat\" is a \"common antisemitic trope\" as I am LITERALLY fucking quoting <PERSON> from Aladdin you dumb dumb left sewer RAT(Street Rat)....", "763" ], [ "> Yes, good for them. There are many other members of Congress, including a whole lot of Republicans and national security Democrats who would gladly vote for it in the place of the dozen progressives who would oppose it.\n\nLOL logic does not follow. Why would the Republican party vote for increased security measures on.... rightwing groups? Doesn't make sense, champ. Might want to think that through more and then we have Conservatives like <PERSON> who would very much be against something like that. Do you even know what you're talking about? Shit isn't as simple as you may think it is.\n\nThere are also a bunch of Republicans in the house who would oppose it. The senate is 50-50 and the Republicans would oppose it. Are you OK?????", "604" ], [ "> Because domestic terrorism laws would not be exclusive to “right wing groups.” They would be vague and overly broad, allowing any political group to be caught up in them.\n\nLOL why are you STILL assuming these laws are going to pass with flying colors? Why are you this dumb???? \n\n > <PERSON>... first of all, he’s one senator\n\nThey are 50-50. <PERSON> is ALSO one Senator from Vermont. All they need is 2 votes and the bill doesn't pass. \n\n > . If he had that kind of power the US Senate wouldn’t be approving $750 billion military budgets every single year.\n\nNon-sequitur \n\n > Do you seriously think the power of the security state has just remained stagnant since the Patriot Act? Like, you do realize it continues to grow every year, right?\n\nI don't know what exactly you're afraid of, but the things the United States law enforcement caught people up on in the past (Like drugs) are being legalized. I also think you misunderstand the era we are in. We are not in the 1960s LOL. There was a lot of drug use in the 1960s and 70s to counter conservatism in the United States and as I said above, law enforcement would use laws to dismantle leftist organization, COINTELPRO. Spying programs and a that jazz, and even though you may think the power of the State has gradually increased they can't charge you for a crime without some cause lol. \n\nYou're literally larping like it's 1960 worried about COINTELPRO and the FBI disrupting leftists organization, but modern leftists movements don't use drugs like they did in the past and people within these movements are not proponents of Orthodox Marxism so you would have to explain to me what Slippery slopes you're afraid of regarding leftists. Conservative plot violent attacks online and carry them out. That is enforceable by law enforcement; skinny DSA kids going to meetings talking about the socialist revolution does not give law enforcement probable cause to go in and put an end to these movements. You guys referencing historical eras are comparing apples to oranges. We are in UNPRECEDENTED times. Anyone says they know what's going to happen based on the past, is a fucking liar or their just stupid....\n\nTl;Dr? Basically stop LARPing like you're in the 1960s. Even if the power to go over right wing groups is somehow increased (And it won't be because there are progressives in Congress and the Senate), If my black ass isn't afraid of increased surveillance because I know they can't catch me up on anything, you don't need to be unless you're doing shady shit. Hey, don't do shady shit\n\nAnd <PERSON> already said the things I am saying and corrected your misconceptions, so why are you STILL on this line of Slippery slopes argumentation? It's BORING. Let's see what happens", "225" ], [ "> After a summer of unidentified federal agents snatching people off the streets and throwing them into unmarked cars, a fellow leftist on Reddit is accusing me of “LARPing.” <PERSON>. \n\nThat has NOTHING to do with the current situation at hand. Try to stay on topic. You're talking about the Democrat increasing the security State. *ALL THAT SHIT THAT HAPPENED THIS SUMMER WAS AT THE BEHEST OF <PERSON>*. ANTIFA being demonized was at the BEHEST of <PERSON>. If you leave out historical context then sure, you're right, but add it into the conversation and it becomes more complex lol. You cannot be this naive so I will have to conclude you're arguing in bad faith so this conversation has reached its natural conclusion.", "815" ], [ "I'm calling you a Trumpanzee because you argue in the same ways as a Trumpanzee. You are Trumpian. <PERSON> here is ALSO Trumpian. Bad faith, hyperbole, and false equivalences are your tools of trade.\n\n#You summarized \n\n\"People are mad at <PERSON> for being a white supremacist, but hey, why isn't anyone mad at <PERSON> for saying BJG coddles white leftists who haven't dealt with their white supremacy\" which increasingly seems to be true, and <PERSON> is one of those \"white leftist\". Not that you care about the dynamic between BJG and <PERSON>. White leftists like you specifically like to bring up drama between black people at irrelevant times like when you're tearing down <PERSON>, but then act like the BAD <PERSON> does is equivalent to the (maybe) one BAD thing <PERSON> did( He should speak to her). Not that you care, you just wanted to draw a false equivalence using black bodies as props just like <PERSON> and republicans do with ANTIFA and neonazis. <PERSON> will NEVER be as bad as <PERSON> though, but nice try. \n\nGuys like <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> now and even you are a stain on the left, so why don't all of you stop doing this bullshit and tell us how you REALLY feel about these things. \n\nTell us bullshit like it's unfair that everyone supported the Summer protests, but the media is overreacting about ARMED INSURRECTION. Go ahead, I've been awaiting that line for awhile now. ALL THINGS ARE EQUAL, right?\n\nConservtard:*Democrats only do unity if you go along with them...*\n\n👆🏿This is brain rot, and you have it. \n\n*The national security apparatus is bipartisan* \n\nsure but guess who created IT? The Republicans after 9/11 but to you and Dore-RATS, the Republicans = The Democratic party which is just absolutely fucking ridiculous thing to state... but oh well, your brain is rotting", "294" ], [ "> How are you, a compete stranger, somehow so in tune with my inner thoughts that you can be so sure I’m lying about my positions?\n\nBecause I've read your posts and their peppered with Trumpian arguments. That's about it dude. A sprinkle of lies here, a little bad faith there, some false equivalence over here, and we have your conversational style. \n\nIf I knew you in person, I'd have to fact check everything you fucking say because you misrepresent objective reality to suit your arguments LOL.\n\n#You summarized\n\n\"People are mad at <PERSON> for being a white supremacist, but hey, why isn't anyone mad at <PERSON> for saying BJG coddles white leftists who haven't dealt with their white supremacy\" which increasingly seems to be true, and <PERSON> is one of those \"white leftists\". Not that you care about the dynamic between BJG and <PERSON>. White leftists (Conservatives do this as well) like you specifically like to bring up drama between black people at irrelevant times like when you're tearing down <PERSON>, but then act like the BAD <PERSON> does is equivalent to the (maybe) one BAD thing <PERSON> did( He should speak to her). Not that you care, you just wanted to draw a false equivalence using black bodies as props just like <PERSON> and republicans do with ANTIFA and neonazis. As ANTIFA will NEVER be as bad as NAZIS, <PERSON> will NEVER be as bad as <PERSON>, but nice try.\"", "294" ], [ "You summarized\n\n\"People are mad at <PERSON> for being a white supremacist, but hey, why isn't anyone mad at <PERSON> for saying BJG coddles white leftists who haven't dealt with their white supremacy\" which increasingly seems to be true, and <PERSON> is one of those \"white leftist\". Not that you care about the dynamic between BJG and <PERSON>. White leftists like you specifically like to bring up drama between black people at irrelevant times like when you're tearing down <PERSON>, but then act like the BAD <PERSON> does is equivalent to the (maybe) one BAD thing <PERSON> did( He should speak to her). Not that you care, you just wanted to draw a false equivalence using black bodies as props just like <PERSON> and republicans do with ANTIFA and neonazis. <PERSON> will NEVER be as bad as <PERSON> though, but nice try.", "294" ], [ "Shitty VR LOL. No one is trying to get seasick my guy. The minimum requirement is 1060 6gb which most gamers have, but that's the MINIMUM requirement so I'm sure the visual fidelity wouldn't be on point. \n\nThe bottom line is the cheapest option for this is an occulus quest 2($400), but if you don't want that and want more visual fidelity and do not have a desktop computer (which most people do not have), Half Life Alyx is an investment of at least $800-900 dollars, my son.", "539" ], [ "> <PERSON> you just criticized the study for not being peer reviewed\n\nThat wasn't my only critique. The findings of the study are inherently flawed and I just put a link to the new England Journal of medicine with peer reviewed articles YOU COULD HAVE LOOKED UP YOURSELF IF YOU WERENT AN INTELLECTUALLY LAZY PERSON, in the comment above. Why EVEN ask the question????\n\n > you don't even know if there is peer reviewed material on point\n\n(SIGH) of course I do, BUT IT IS BESIDES THE POINT LAZY-ASS. \n\n\n > Yikes\n\nYup, yikes, you're not very bright. Got it. I have to know the number of peer-reviewed articles out there to be able to critique THIS article. Makes perfect sense.... idiot \n\n[NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE](_URL_0_)", "234" ], [ "> <PERSON>. I’ve never said the current context is “the same as 9/11.”\n\nYou are implying that the democrats and Republicans will be moved by the current situation enough that they will act in similar ways that they did after 9/11. You even use Slippery slopes and boogeyman stories from the last time the State security apparatus increased to make your point of comparison. In that way you are comparing apples to oranges. \n\nYou're saying since we had an event similar to 9/11, the State will crackdown on political organizations just like it cracked down on Muslim organizations after 9/11. I guess it gets hard to follow your own line of thought when you're all over the fucking place, but don't worry, I can keep up with ya. \n\nMy argument is you don't know HOW the democrats are going to react to this so stop doing useless speculation, especially considering that if some Bill did seek to increase the power of the State's ability to spy on people, we have PEOPLE in the House and Senate now to CHECK that type of law. We did NOT have those people 20 years ago, so STOP comparing apples to oranges", "468" ], [ "> And the Quest 2 starts at $300, not 400. So lot even half of 900, bro.\n\n.... 64 GB of internal storage @$299 vs 256 GB of internal storage @399. The $299 model is useless. \n\n > . More than a 1060, but that still proves my point that any modern gaming PC sold today can do VR at an acceptable leve\n\nNot any modern gaming cpu as the minimum specs are 1060 6gb. The BASELINE is the 1060 6gb, not even the 1060 3gb. \n\n > My CPU is TEN years old, the newest component is a 1070ti.\n\nBut your GPU is above minimum specs, if you had less than 1060, which is a lot of people, you HAVE to upgrade to at least that, and if you're going to do that, may as well get the most modern hardware, so either way it's going to be expensive to break in if you're under specs. Most people do not have desktop computers either so $399 investment for Quest 2 or at least $800-900 for new hardware because I'm not going to build a computer with old parts lol and I think most people are similar.", "757" ], [ "> You're confused because you don't realize there's a common bipartisan ideology here (namely neoliberalism).\n\nI mean, that's pretty much what I'm saying isn't it? Lol\n\nGo ahead and read more of the post. Don't comment though. No point\n\nNeoliberalism refers to *market-oriented reform policies* such as \"*eliminating price controls*, *deregulating capital markets*, *lowering trade barriers*\" and reducing, *especially through privatization and austerity*, *state influence in the economy*", "285" ], [ "> Real neoliberalism has never been tried.\n\nUnironically LOL....\n\n\n\"REAL SOCIALISM has never been tried\" \n\n👆🏿 I believe this Statement more than I believe your statement because your statement is FUCKING ridiculous, ahistorical, and empirical evidence does not bear out what you are saying... like at all.\n\n\"REAL Neoliberalism has never been tried\" guy🤣🤣😍🤣\n\nNeoliberalism refers to *market-oriented reform policies* such as \"*eliminating price controls*, *deregulating capital markets*, *lowering trade barriers*\" and reducing, *especially through privatization and austerity*, *state influence in the economy*", "534" ], [ "> You're wrong on two counts and it is easy to point out:\n\n > Neoliberals don't like to call themselves neoliberals.\n\nLOL nitpicking? You're about to get blocked. \n\n > Two of the prominent early neoliberal politicians, <PERSON> and <PERSON>, were conservatives.\n\n\nI'm referring to social conservatives, the majority of conservatives and we're keeping things confined to the US, not the rest of the world. \n\n > Shows a lack of understanding of neoliberalism's background on your part.\n\nNo, shows a lack of your ability to read and comprehend other people's writings.", "285" ], [ "> Right. It's easier to accuse the other side of nitpicking than to admit you're wrong.\n\nNo, I'm not wrong though and I defined neoliberalism correctly the first time.\n\nThe vast, vast majority of American conservatives do NOT know what you are referring to if you were to say neoliberalism. That word isn't even in the lexicon of American social conservatives. You do not know what you are talking about because you are a moron. Do you think <PERSON> knows what neoliberalism is, moron???\n\nHow about ANYBODY in his Whitehouse. Use your imagination. I can't use mine for both of us\n\nWhen I say neoliberals don't like to call themselves neoliberals, I am not referring to reddit but the REAL WORLD. Get off reddit", "285" ], [ "A democracy that isn't really a democracy with powerful elites controlling the country... but our country has always been that. The issue here is more the economic system and its tendency to concentrate wealth into few hands where those hands are able to control the societal narrative. Those elites can then create alternative information outlets that funnel misinformation to large swaths of people basically creating two or even more running narrative within society. \n\nThat's why conservatives think ANTIFA is fascist when they were the fascists all along... I mean, it's literally in the name. But they don't ACTUALLY think that, they do what they do out of racial self-interest and racial hierarchy, especially Evangelical Christians. They want their shrinking racegroup to hold a monopoly on political power within this country, and they will LIE, CHEAT, AND STEAL to do so. That is why I don't buy that these people are in a cult, they arent, they're at war and they consider this war to be [Total War]( _URL_0_) and maybe even the LAST war before you know who comes back, and <PERSON> is their guy now and forever. \n\nThis isn't about the constitution or politics or anything like that, this is strictly about identity. The propaganda that is funneled to them through people like <PERSON> are just talking points against liberal arguments, that is all. So ANTIFA are the enemy blah blah blah blah. You heard it I'm sure. Just rhetoric they don't even care about.", "593" ], [ "Racist, white conservatives HATE being treated in the same fashion as black people. You know what more they hate? They hate seeing articulate, well-off black men in society because that is an anathema to them, especially if those black men seem to be doing better than they are. Racist, white conservatives HATE running into that because it fucks their whole worldview, and increasingly, they ARE running into more successful people of color, and that is one of the impetus for the Capitol Riot...\n\nThey have to take their country back, put us all back in our places, and rule this country as a superior minority.", "1020" ], [ "> I am not a trumpist. I am a democrat. Voted for <PERSON> and then <PERSON>. \n\nReading comprehension. I said your BEHAVIOR is Trumpian and it is. You are LITERALLY being reactionary towards a headline. \n\n > Also, that WAS my argument\n\nWell, YOUR argument is a strawman because her argument is not \"we should take care of systemic racism before $2000 checks\", it is \"WHITE PEOPLE MUST ACKNOWLEDGE WHITE SUPREMACY\"! That is the thesis of the video. \n\n > Systematic racism is a whole different animal\n\nLOL\n\n > The conflation of these two programs help no one.\n\nWATCH THE VIDEO!!! What is wrong with you??? Do you not understand that you are BEHAVING like a Trumptard???? \n\nYou are commenting and making strawman arguments not even related to what she is talking about. Please stop if you really are a leftist because it is infuriating to black people like me. You are arguing against a strawman. PLEASE STOP IT. PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO, then comment (probable) white liberal.\n\n#YOU ARE BEING REACTIONARY", "614" ], [ "> Again, name one democrat worth his salt that the 2000 dollar check is meant to SOLVE systematic racism.\n\nYou want me to name one WHITE LEFTIST who has SUGGESTED this MAGA uprising is motivated by economic INJUSTICE? <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and I could go on and on and on. \n\n > Dude the video is like 10 mins long. I watched it already. You know that i am subbed to her channel right? I watch the MR. \n\nIf you watched it already, you are now misrepresenting her argument. What is the thesis of the video? I need you to answer that. What is the SUBJECT of the video??? Just break it down simply.\n\nAnd if you put the video at 2x speed, it's only 5 minutes long.", "337" ], [ "> Lastly, it was never my contention that MAGA capitol terrorists could be settled down with 2000 dollar checks.\n\nThen simply stop making strawman arguments.\n\nWhite people acknowledging systemic racism and people getting stimulus checks are not mutually exclusive things, but you are still behaving like they are. Your comment therefore is SUPERFLUOUS to the discussion at hand.\n\n > Her argument isn't anything new that Trumpists don't actually suffer from economic anxiety. Its pretty well known its cultural anxiety. I made this argument a few nights ago before the video was posted\n\nNo, it is not \"pretty well known\" as much as you want it to be. STOP SAYING THAT!!! A New York Times article from 2 years ago does not prove that white leftists are not taking this line of thought. <PERSON> is also one. Millions of people WATCH THESE PEOPLE. Stop hand waving their influence", "332" ], [ "> i am curious...do you think America in general is divided by race or class?\n\nWell, since I'm black, upper middle class AND RACIST SHIT STILL HAPPENS TO ME, I would have to go for ALL OF THE ABOVE, <PERSON>. \n\nWhy do these things have to be mutually exclusive? It is both a race (First and foremost) and a class issue. Most people in this country are NOT class conscious and if you say they are, we are done with this conversation. \n\nA RICH nigger is still a NIGGER to these people.", "987" ], [ "> ...i am just asking a question...\n\nLOL \"I'm just asking questions, guys\". Is <PERSON> not a Kenyan nigger to these people? \n\nquestions YOU ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWERS TO!!!!\n\nSo called \"allies\" like you are INFURIATING. <PERSON> calls for solidarity, and you cause more division by acting OBLIVIOUS.\n\nI am not going to \"relax\" until you stop being OBLIVIOUS. What is your goal in being this OBLIVIOUS? You're about to get blocked because this is SUPER GAS LIGHTING right now, and I can't even trust a word you say. You're gonna ask me if America's problem is related to EITHER/OR, but why haven't YOU considered it being related to BOTH????? Because you are not a true ally and you're perfectly fine with white supremacy.", "987" ], [ "> I am fine with white supremacy??? \n\nYes, you are it would seem because you would rather throw out Non-sequiturs and strawman instead of saying, \"I stand in solidarity with the black and brown communities to not only ACKNOWLEDGE white supremacy, but to eliminate it from our society.\" All you have done is deflect, make excuses , argue against things not being said, and the list goes on. Your very nature is TRUMPIAN. You never respond to any arguments either lol", "987" ], [ "Not another conservative. Go watch <PERSON> if you really want to understand what is going on. <PERSON> is an elite at the top who used these nazis to gain the Republican party power, but now they are no longer useful to <PERSON> so he's throwing them in the trash. <PERSON> helped create the mess, now listen to [<PERSON>_) to truly understand the *MONSTER* people like <PERSON> created, because I don't think <PERSON> even understands what he has sown.", "220" ], [ "Who is posting these trash rising videos??? Lol We Must do nothing, those are private companies. Instead of lobbying for Twitter as human right, why dont you lobby for Healthcare as a human right you fucking HACKS.\n\n#INSTA-downvote when conservatives gaslight and claim this is a \"freedom of speech\" issue while also saying to trust in markets. \n\nFuck outta here, I'm done with the FALSE EQUIVALENCES\n\nPRIVATE COMPANY =/= GOVERNMENT", "106" ], [ "I think the spirit of what <PERSON> was trying to say is this economic system and economic policies promotes the concentration of wealth into a few hands, and the hands where that wealth has concentrated into promote an alternative societal narrative and without proper INVESTMENT into our society, people are always going to be susceptible to that alternative narrative. And keep in mind I am only referring to Trumpist that are NOT Evangelical Christians. \n\nThe motivations of the Evangelical Christians is NOT economic, but religious and it's about their supremacy within this society. So to counter people like the <PERSON>, and <PERSON>, we have to invest in our society and under the current neoclassical neoliberal paradigm, the State promotes privatization and austerity measures instead of government spending to do things like educate its populace. We can't have a democratic society without an educated populace. \n\nAlso, this is an aside but I hope the Orthodox Marxists can see that violent revolution is not the way, especially if your reason are nebulous lol. I consider myself a socialist, promote socialist ideas, but am practical and understand that if we ever want a democratic and socialist society, we have to gradually move towards that through SOCIAL DEMOCRACY and once the population is SUFFICIENTLY EDUCATED, then and only then may we talk about a truly socialist society. And after that, the end goal: communism lol\n\nBut the socialist and communsit revolution isn't happening in our lifetime. I have accepted that fact, and \"socialism\" will have to be a GLOBAL system. <PERSON>'s idea of socialism NOT <PERSON>'s\n\nOrganizations like Diem25 are an example of this", "870" ], [ "There is a comment on this post, but I can't see it so I'm assuming the person blocked me. If they blocked me, I'm sure they're spouting that bullshit, so please argue in my stead. We know what this is about and we aren't going to let the contingent of the white boy left say this a \"class issue\" when it clearly is not. They WANT IT to be a class issue because they are COWARDS and talking about these things make them uncomfortable for some reason, but just because they want it to be that, doesn't make it so.", "987" ] ]
95
[ 19113, 18042, 4787, 5162, 1650, 24708, 275, 23990, 2351, 24844, 12417, 17466, 7824, 9861, 5076, 2774, 23715, 14598, 441, 13752, 7574, 18175, 11821, 3223, 7778, 9692, 14356, 18030, 16607, 15563, 23216, 16152, 11513, 21932, 9938, 3831, 22334, 17235, 6728, 24291, 6335, 24928, 5348, 547, 13308, 4213, 12382, 17465, 4323, 10874, 24185, 22393, 5264, 7712, 40, 15509, 2951, 15885, 15628, 1462, 23928, 14964, 24771, 8017, 19348, 23173, 17234, 11182, 6187, 9306, 13, 15477, 10785, 1499, 18681, 1237, 25126, 2743, 21782, 3, 694, 14139, 2633, 13092, 8108, 17236, 13987, 15779, 23806, 12160, 18320, 22006, 22124, 12800, 11431, 24085, 20950, 6406, 22983, 12447, 9308, 2134, 23117, 19870, 1884, 14179, 16724, 17237, 24083, 10134, 10718, 24445, 3092, 6642, 12361, 8819, 13002, 14710, 13416, 17048, 22798, 24575, 2484, 11810, 21742, 24474, 7047, 22034, 4547, 20063, 14191, 7543, 3907, 14319, 10416, 9672, 8558, 4797, 1535, 17016, 3072, 4638, 23053, 266, 6503, 19131, 21680, 25166, 12888, 18197, 12744, 2137, 22153, 6272, 15085, 6256, 14675, 8005, 3931, 19023, 20460, 3501, 24572, 15915, 7516, 15635, 22102, 22567, 7493, 19776, 5765, 10280, 6122, 8045, 1729, 12158, 15255, 13581, 24832, 3929, 15916, 15009, 23293, 6644, 23571, 11688, 16982, 5708, 12617, 7695, 2829, 10495, 14087, 3138, 3009, 2583, 15720, 1222, 14466, 23914, 22254, 10768, 23317, 12119, 24022, 2783, 18477, 25423, 13398, 18644, 4933, 22949, 22160, 6633, 6026, 2188, 3721, 8687, 20053, 20858, 22635, 14948, 3840, 19078, 2145, 8325, 15869, 22821, 10661, 8554, 19165, 7273, 1664, 4796, 3404, 15147, 11458, 633, 4910, 10664, 23163, 5698, 7338, 16584, 2467, 3988, 25471, 21667, 7701, 16798, 5661, 20067, 20238, 18914, 12920, 10672, 6704, 9323, 17508, 21033, 9373, 6973, 8158, 8207, 639, 493, 1704, 20553, 21462, 22242, 24129, 18248, 16540, 10537, 22688, 1254, 2277, 5759, 12907, 24390, 13363, 18063, 19708, 19410, 13778, 20316, 4243, 16681, 13551, 20845, 3818, 18160, 877, 23187, 18704, 24460, 3850, 19425, 18575, 16399, 7622, 8732, 21136, 24552, 2287, 20991, 5599, 7577, 15535, 5463, 8627, 19658, 14393, 9092, 8322, 14949, 12941, 23151, 10497, 4859, 4371, 4, 5993, 1633, 20332, 13054, 25052, 16447, 2191, 2224, 25404, 10328, 2489, 4277, 9466, 15890, 7271, 21170, 7791, 2793, 4889, 21811, 25508, 420, 6087, 3815, 18349, 7719, 20258, 9115, 2916, 14896, 5905, 19807, 2116, 22535, 17172, 6310, 20191, 17132, 7364, 17625, 18289, 7946, 5142, 5538, 14555, 22970, 5122, 6277, 6736, 13157, 9666, 7904, 5713, 12129, 22830, 4824, 22, 12873, 10759, 5947, 3427, 837, 15701, 13184, 19256, 11646, 22180, 20145, 19587, 14663, 14638, 7155, 8865, 8674, 2507, 5835, 13179, 21953, 24755, 19299, 8617, 13822, 17474, 21741, 5216, 19687, 12376, 11463, 10763, 24729, 5997, 25195, 18374, 3762, 488, 83, 5580, 12579, 16249, 5190, 16344, 19492, 20272, 20988, 16979, 21099, 24187, 11626, 19095, 13321, 15823, 18455, 2436, 9486, 21663, 19781, 12872, 17397, 499, 6821, 16569, 9752, 4269, 856, 13509, 10199, 24202, 12278, 9880, 22648, 11183, 25067, 2644, 11580, 8600, 23358, 22156, 2533, 21992, 14970, 15238, 10813, 11455, 15367, 1555, 16031, 11018, 15413, 23820, 13698, 12034, 10232, 286, 15186, 1321, 3406, 15555, 6276, 11845, 21460, 361, 10139, 7474, 2545, 13014, 8742, 18409, 10163, 7002, 23467, 8973, 17584, 6157, 24263, 14972, 2851, 917 ]
reddit_dump_-Ben------
[ [ "at these lower levels you, as a feral druid, want to focus on ambushes - that is prowl and rake,\ntry not to stay out of stealth too long because you are squishy,\nfor quite a large level bracket certain spells or abilities will just wreck you(like disc priest's penance, hits like a truck).\n\nremember to keep rake and 5 point rip applied to your main target, then maim or ferocious bite as necessary(i rarely use ferocious bite)\nlater you get a very hard hitting talent 'brutal slash', that often turns the tide of the fight.\n\njust remember to move *quickly*, weave around your target - while you do that they can't hit you effectively, until they face you.\n\ncasters often have a problem with attacking someone weaving around them, so they may use a knock back such as 'shining force' putting you at range for them to hit and slowing you,\nwild charge ability solves this as a gap closer\n\nanyways, have fun!", "128" ], [ "why do they deserve better?\n\nwhy do you need every death to be equal?\n\nrogues are assassins, assassins *could* very well kill ten highly trained anybodies,\n\ni feel like you're just whining because it's two Horde races that are the rogues\n\n\n<PERSON> i slaughtered every single night elf i could find, druids sentinels, etc.\n\ntell me why they deserve better ?", "1022" ], [ "i never seem to have a problem though the spec does feel lacklustre,\n\ni use Greater Judgement as it always crits at > 50% hp every target it hits, and your mastery effects only Judgement\n\nfor PVE if you're not doing too well try taking 'Justicar's Vengeance' + 'Divine Purpose',\nwhen DP procs use JV\n\ni'm not sure if that is much of a help anymore but towards the first half of the expac it was the way to go", "913" ], [ "i don't think you understand the concept of what is happening here\n\nyou will still be in a PVP state, PVPers will *STILL* be hunting you,\nnothing will change EXCEPT you can now no longer attack people who don't want to fight,\nyou will *NEVER* see people who are flagged differently to you,\nyou will *ONLY* see PVP flagged players if you are flagged for PVP.\n\nyou get extra talents if you're flagged as PVP so people will choose to flag themselves to use these\n\nit's a wonderful idea, i can't honestly think of a reason why it isn't, and nobody has stated anything factual that would see this as a bad idea\n\nits only people wanting to hunt unsuspecting lowbies,\nno other reason", "345" ], [ "English don't use American measurements,\nwe do use our own old imperial measurements meshed in with metric though.\n\nthe spelling thing is always overlooked but i will always spell the words the way they're supposed to be spelled,\ni do think it is important that British children(and everyone else bar Americans) are taught the correct English spelling/phrases/idioms/etc,\nas i see it there is no reason to favour the simplified American spelling/phrases over the actual spellings/phrases in English,\n\nlike if i was speaking Spanish i'd speak it as the Spanish speak it not, for eg, the way Mexicans do(unless i was exclusively living in Mexico).\n\nseeing as though the English global standard is English English(British) it would make sense to accept either spelling in America,\nbut the national institutions of America tend to err on the side of maintaining their own identity by enforcing slightly modified versions of languages/measurement standards.\n\nsince most Americans never leave the country; it often isn't an issue - or it wasn't before the internet age", "930" ], [ "you'll be using the old imperial measurements of Britain not the American imperial measurements(there's a slight difference in places),\nso like both would be '5 foot 7' but we'd use 'Stone' as a larger measurement for 'Pounds(lb)', which Americans don't use.\n\nthere are other examples i just can't think of right now.\n\n\nstatistics covers the consensus that the vast majority do not leave the country, if they holiday they do so in other states rather than other countries.\n\nyou can see quite easily what i meant by looking at what the enforced standards are and viewing American history since their independence,\nit's been a long battle for identity in a sea of other heritage identities,\n\neg; mostly dutch/german/irish/english\n\nthe general American consensus is an aversion to these 'mother' identities, so the idea is that the powers that be seek to be as individual as possible whilst retaining the tools of their predecessors(eg; language).\n\nit's the pre-during-post WWI/II American isolationism and nationalism", "455" ], [ "what?\n\ni don't understand why this has turned all sarcastic and bitchy?\n\ni meant 'we' as in 'us', the two English people here. you said you were English.\n\n > mostly with people who are also English.\n\nthat doesn't make sense?\nmy point was it always devolves into a UK vs US nationlist argument\n\ni've had these arguments many times but ubiquitously with Americans,\nbecause two English people having a nationalist argument their own country doesn't make sense in this context", "579" ], [ "it was the 'dampen your joy' bit that stuck out,\n\nbut all is fine, there was no offence taken\n\n\ni'll admit i do instantly dismiss nationlism from people i know or people of the UK,\ni disagree with the concept and, for the most part, people who have that ethos tend to be very angry and need something to direct that anger at\n\nthat being said; the vast majority of these heated arguments happen online where the worst of people's opinions come pouring out,\n\nwe wouldn't typically hear it in day to day life off the internet, well not much anyway", "579" ], [ "it's a bit like the missing verbal tones takes a chunk of the context away,\nfor me at least.\n\n\ni used to, some of my friends were paradoxically right wing(i'm left wing), sometimes these heated anti-muslim(etc) arguments ended up in shouting matches.\n\nneedless to say i don't see them any more,\nit's one thing to be part of a risqué discussion but another constantly having the same arguments that have no resolution to them,\n\njust the angry opinions getting airtime", "622" ], [ "me deleting those other posts has nothing to do with you,\nthey weren't in response to you, i have not deleted any of my replies to you, and they absolutely were not removed to 'strengthen my argument'.\n\nthis is the thing i've tried to reiterate countless times now; alpha stages are NOT for class balancing/fluidity.\n\ni am not talking about the full expansion,\ni was speaking specifically about the releases of MoP to Legion,\n\nthe first being terrible, second being better but still broke, and the latter being flawless", "508" ], [ "not sure for Aussies but here in the UK a 'block' would commonly be a tower block set of flats(apartments, etc),\n\nwe' probably use 'estate' instead but 'round the block' is definitely still used here, it would depend on the structure of the housing there - like in city centres we'd navigate using streets(go down that street onto the another then take the left street) rather than blocks(continue past the block)\n\n\npersonally i love these little foibles and similarities the English speaking nations have retained", "69" ], [ "that's one of the most interesting things about the UK(mostly England); the rapid changes in accents over very small distances,\n\npeople in nearby towns can have wildly different accents,\n\ni'm from the north of England relatively close to the border of Scotland,\nyou can hear the blend of Scottish and English in the Geordie accent.\nGeordies still use some words that were brought over by the Vikings, often with no clue of the origins\n\n\nsometimes we can't properly understand eachother, for example the Liverpool accent is called <PERSON> and when it's particularly thick it can be hard for non-liverpudlians to understand.\n\nthen there's cockney accent which sounds awful to us all(and what most of the world thinks we all talk like), its restricted to certain areas of London", "5" ], [ "that is not what i'm saying.\nyeah they add new skillls to test, to debug\n\ni have literally said numerous times what my point is;\n\nAlpha is for reporting missing floors/disconnect waypoints/functions that don't work/bad collision detection/sound syncing/zone transition bugs/etc,\n\nAlpha is not for seeing how your class plays in endgame or ingame at all - YET.\n\nthat stage has yet to come.\n\nevrybody here treating Alpha like it's Beta or like it's the finished game they get to play months before everyone else\n\n\nit's annoying to hear this crap about how classes aren't feeling as fluid as Legion endgame because it's totally irrelevant to the purpose of being an Alpha tester", "586" ], [ "if it was valid criticism it would be sent to Blizzard *directly* and it would be about an appropriate ALPHA topic,\nnot complaints about something that is not even supposed to finished or balance bitch posted on reddit.\n\ni don't care whether you concede whatever points you make,\nthe point is this is not what program Alpha stage is for;\nit's for fishing bugs and broken things,\nlate Beta stage is for class balancing/fluidity\n\ncomplaining about it on reddit in Alpha stages is pointless\n\n\n_URL_0_", "586" ], [ "well each of the accents have their own full set of colloqualisms, so much so we could talk to eachother using them and others would not understand\n\nlike that austin powers scene where he's talking to <PERSON> and the two japanese girls haven't a clue what's being said xD\n\n\n<PERSON> but to me, <PERSON> is ubiquitously awful - <PERSON> is horrible as well but it can be pretty sexy from the right person", "1007" ], [ "depends on your region, faction, and time of day.\n\nin EU atm Horde win 90% of battlegrounds throughout the day but we have to wait up to 10 minute for queues because Horde players queuing for the BG vastly outnumber the Alliance players(faction number pvp imbalance is why the mercenary buff exists),\nbut Alliance usually have to wait 1 minute for BG queues.\n\nbecause of that higher frequency of BGs i've got my Alliance characters to lvl 2 prestige in a fraction of the time it took my Horde characters", "822" ], [ "<PERSON> definitely isn't like a holy mage,\nthey have one ranged damaging ability and an essentially worthless gap closer,\nthey need to be in melee range or else they get kited to death, more so than any other class because you can't just jump/charge away/at/grab the target(DH/Warr/Monk/Druid/Rogue/Shaman/DK/)\n\nif you are caught at range without a healer you very likely will die with no chance,\n\n<PERSON> needs a jump ability like <PERSON> has", "354" ], [ "it's because, discounting the Nightborne, they are the only aesthetically pleasing race Horde side,\nthe vast majority of us don't like to have a character that is a literal monster from real world folklore,\ntrolls, minotaurs, goblins, undead people, orcs - all monsters.\n\ni don't want to be funneled into the self-righteous goody-two-shoes Alliance direction just because i want a character that is more a reflection of me than a 'hur dur i'm a bad guy monster person', i like to play Horde without being the epitome of a warband grotesque", "1022" ], [ "my issue with <PERSON> and the <PERSON> is; why would they allude to being back in Silvermoon when they all know their presence could destabalise and destroy the Sunwell?\n\nsurely <PERSON>, not being full of her own self-righteousness, would recognise that her, and the <PERSON>'s, presence in Quel'thalas would result in the Sunwell being destroyed *again*.\n\nif i were her or <PERSON> i wouldn't want to destroy the infrastructure of Quel'thalas and be the cause of so many deaths of my people simply because i felt like i *should* be back at home instead of exiled, where my new nature is a poison to the atmospheric energies of the Sunwell.\n\nI really don't like <PERSON> now, she has childish spiteful responses", "475" ], [ "yeah sorry mate, if instant spells from a mage wrecked you and your raid, then you're shit - full stop.\n\nquite clearly you're experience in PVP is bullshit because you would Cyclone him the instant he showed up, \nOR every should've focused him.\n\n\nlet's not forget you were fighting <PERSON> at the time, so add a faction leaders damage(and all his adds) on top of this random mage.\n\n\nto deflect; you need to L2P buddy, because i have NEVER been one shot by a mage(or anyone other than <PERSON>) in endgame PVP,\nthat's just laughably pathetic,\n\nso much so you had to come on reddit and cry your eyes out about it,\n\nyou're clearly not good at PVP otherwise that encounter would've went differently,\n\n\nsorry dude, you're just shit\n\n\n\n¯\\\\\\_(ツ)_/¯", "190" ], [ "that's not supply and demand,\nsupply and demand is the flux of prices based on demand for the product,\n\nwith Blizzards character boost none of that ever happened, it was introduced at that high price with a bullshit excuse as to why.\n\n\ni won't demonise a company for making money but i *WILL* denounce them for rinsing money from their customers with ridiculously unfounded overpriced services which are a fraction of the price in any other game.\n\n\nthere is a population of people willing to pay 20x the game and sub fees so they can rampage about elbowing people out the game.\n\njust because it's 'okay' doesn't mean they're not absolute arsewipes for doing so", "387" ], [ "no they made it for themselves,\nin the same way <PERSON> made LotR for himself not money,\nit's why, for the most part, they're all fans of the game world.\n\nit then *becomes* a good money pull when it becomes successful.\n\nwith the advent of multiboxers in WoW they realised they *could* rinse ridiculous sums from them, a person paying $60 20 times to boost their multibox characters.\n\n\nits shameless cash grabbing - the idea behind successful businesses is that they offer a service for a reasonable price, and *care* about their customers and their 'brand' loyalty.\n\ni realise i'm wasting my time trying to explain this because the reply will inevitably be something contrary.\n\nyou have excess of money to sink into overpriced services like this; the vast majority of us do not.", "905" ], [ "there was a place exactly like this in an old game i used to play called Yulgang,\n\nit was where everyone chilled when they weren't grinding exp\n\nthere'd be funny things like; some overpowered people taking control of the centre arena and killing all who entered, only for an even mre powerful player to arrive and kill them, letting everyone back in to play \n\nit was fun and a nice social area to congregate \n\nGMs would hold events there, like 'kill the GM' the person to get the killing blow won a big price\n\nit would take like half an hour with 50 odd people attacking the GM", "326" ], [ "<PERSON> is pursuing her plans,\n\nshe was using us to further her agenda,\n\nshe wants to be the one to take Azeroth into the Void,\nshe was the first to be destroyed, by her brothers <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON>.\n\nshe wants revenge and we gave it to her,\n\ni think if we defeat <PERSON> then <PERSON> will absorb the remains of all her brothers and become the last Old God of Azeroth,\n\nshe wants to be the ruler of a new Black Empire.\nshe will use us all to get there", "823" ], [ "i'm not sure of the other two but <PERSON> has said she will disappear without a trace one day,\n onto her next stage in the plan\n\ni'm excited to see if they do anything with her - they created a new Old God, there must be a better reason than just for a Legion weapon.\n\nlike we could have a small scenario where she disappears at the end and all you hear is her laughter fading away", "719" ], [ "if you do arrive at any time of year make sure it's spring, so you can enjoy the beautiful scenery at it's best,\n\nwe get all seasons roughly equal, not sure if thats the same where you're from,\nso we get white winters, orange autumns, etc\n\n\nwinter and autumn are pretty but the cold and wet grates on you very easily xD\n\nspring has just kicked in now the temperature is rising!", "891" ], [ "it's super obvious;\n\nKal'dorei treat the Shal'dorei like rats because of the War of the Ancients,\n<PERSON>'s xenophobia is never properly justified.\n\nthe Shal'dorei join the Sin'dorei because only they *KNOW* the pain and suffering the Shal'dorei went through deprived of the <PERSON>,\nbecause the same happened to the Sin'dorei with the <PERSON>.\n\ndiscounting the fact that both Shal/Sin'dorei cultures are heavily based upon mastery of the Arcane,\nwhereas Kal'dorei murdered magical practitioners and now have very tenuous tolerance towards their own mages, let alone anyone else's.\n\nthere was no reason for the Shal'dorei to join the Kal'dorei,\n<PERSON> made zero effort to win them over,\n\nthe Shal'dorei are where they belong with their cousins who understand", "1022" ], [ "personally i have it on *EVERY* character,\n\nthe glider and nitroboosts(super speed buff, 2min CD/watergliding(swim fast or walk on water,30sec CD) jets are just far too useful not to have, even on classes that can break their falls(priest, mage, warrior, hunter, dh),\n\nthat and the wormhole portal devices: 2x Outland(Toshley's Station, Area52,4hr CD), Northrend portal(all zones,4hr CD), Draenor portal(all zones, 4hr CD), Pandaria portal(quick cast, 15min CD, random location, great for escaping), Argus portal(same as panda portal)\n\nalso being able to use the mechanical auctioneers in Dalaran and the Shrines in the Vale\n\ni prize engineering - i try to get as many people to try it, i think its great", "675" ], [ "that's a fair bit of hyperbole, <PERSON>\n\ni really wasn't that simple\n\nthe only faction representative that liasoned with <PERSON> and the Nightborne was Lady <PERSON>.\n\ntherein lies enough of a reason to join her.\n\ntechnically it was the Dreamweavers that cured the Nightborne of their dependency withdrawals with the Arcan'dor fruit.\nwe didn't cure them, per se, we just helped them through it - like any compassionate creature would do, selflessly.\n\ni don't recall anywhere stating the Nightborne burn down Teldrassil, when was that revealed?", "823" ], [ "yeah i know what you mean,\n\nwell when you do eventually visit, try not to stay in London - it's very expensive, far cheaper in other places, and because the UK is small you can visit Wales or Scotland on a day trip. possibly even the Republic of/Northern Ireland - if you get an early flight!\n\n\ni sound like a fucking tavel agent hahah", "146" ], [ "i completely agree,\n\ni think all the Allied-Races should've taken just a little moment to consider things, or the faction leaders involved.\n\neg: Void Elves, while they were banished from Silvermoon, they didn't have to leave the Horde.\nthe banishment was a bit too strict, being barred from the Sunwell would have sufficed.\n<PERSON> aside i feel a lot of the Blood Elf Void practitioners that became Void elves wouldn't be so quick to jump into the Alliance - after all there is a reason the Blood Elves are not in the Alliance or friendly with them.\n\n\ni guess it was just made into a race to fill the factions", "436" ], [ "i'm not sure your doctor friend is really that correct,\n\ndrinking water stimulates the digestive system(to better digest food) but also supresses appetitie,\n\nalso warm water has very low oxygen content, IIRC a substance needs to match or exceed your own atmospheric oxygen exposure or else it will sap it from your body(like drinking pure water will steal nutrients from you).\n\ncold water retains nutrients(like Calcium, Magnesium, etc) and oxygen far better(sc: am aquarium owner)", "982" ], [ "that *is* how threat works, i've literally experienced that situation countless times,\nafter the warlock has pulled all the agro and died, the mobs splash onto everyone else,\n\nlower level tanks do not have a monopoly on threat,\nthe healer very often will pull agro when they're healing heavily\n\n\n > the pet will die quickly anyway\n\nwhich causes the mobs to run to the healer or other DPS\n\n\n\nyou're only convincing me you haven't played as tank in a DG 15-110 at all recently", "345" ], [ "she's not a Jedi,\nand even saying 'the last of the Jedi' could imply a plural - he didn't say 'when I die; you are the last Jedi'.\n\nand look at <PERSON> when she returns, it looks like she's been on a huge spiritual journey - a full transition into the true light of the Force,\nshe and the <PERSON>'s presence will have been doing important things elsewhere,\nwe know that the light Force grants pre-cognition and futuresight,\nperhaps she knew of <PERSON>'s plan, \nand saw <PERSON>'s destiny - she has no place in those events.\n\nthe Purgils are basically made of some kind of super strong material,\nthey are gas gulping, Force attuned space whales that can travel through hyperspace - energy bolts are going to have very minor effects on them,\nand assuming the Force allows them to see things before they happen; a canon bolt would be foreseen and avoided", "541" ], [ "as a gay guy on EU i've never really experienced this,\nof the few throwaway comments made they were mostly by children - at that age where they think saying nasty things is 'cool',\nor low english speakers thinking swear words are funny to say \nwhich is meh, i've experienced worse in real life by orders of magnitutde,\n\n\ni have to say though; the last 2 LGBT friendly guilds i was in were destroyed by a straight woman throwing a tantrum about something - then taking all the 'white knights' with her, ruining the guild", "418" ], [ "i used to think this a lot but i play SWtOR as well and i noticed something;\n\nit's me! it's my behaviour - even though i'm the kind of person to heal you or resurrect you if i happen upon you having a difficult time,\nit just never goes further,\n\ni assume people are doing what i'm doing; silently being nice because i feel like i'd be bothering people otherwise\n\n\ni've always wanted a friend a could play all the time with but it just never seems to happen,\n\nso after 9 or s years i'm finally almost certain that it's my fault and i need to modify my behaviour to be more approachable", "204" ], [ "living for thousands of years _would_ make you more powerful than your human equivilent,\n\nit's called experience, if a master human mage is a master for doing his craft for 60 years then an elf is far more powerful having perfected the craft over hundreds to thousands of years.\n\n > Why would an Elf need to study when they're so innately in tune with magic?\n\nit is their culture and has been for thousands of years, their lands are literally swimming in magic; everything floats,\n\nbasic arcane is known by everyone there\n\n > You have no idea what <PERSON> is. Stop using this term.\n\n\nan unfounded overpowered story individual,\n\nthat is exactly what she is - <PERSON>", "310" ], [ "> Yes, in the real world. This is not the real world. This is a fantasy setting.\n\nso what? applying that simply invalidates literally EVERYTHING any of us has to say on the matter,\n\nexperience has bearing everywhere even in fictional settings(duh?),\nthe fantasy elves live longer than the fantasy humans, therefore they are more experienced in their primes.\n\nthat is just logic\n\n\n\n > Nope. Try again buddy.\n\n\n\"<PERSON> is an idealized and seemingly perfect fictional character. Often, this character is recognized as an author insert or wish fulfillment.[1] They can usually perform better at tasks than should be possible given the amount of training or experience, and usually are able through some means to upstage the main protagonist of the story, such as by saving the hero.\"\n\n\nilluminate me with your secret 'true' definition", "310" ], [ "i mentioned the aquarium thing because of the water, not human body, water quality is something you have to be on top of when owning fish,\nyou learn a lot about how water carries certain things and at what temperatures.\n\nthe atmospheric oxygen thing is not what you need to breathe it just permeates us,\n\n\neg; if you were in space(without a body suit) the vacuum would sap the oxygen from the constituent parts of your body(regardless of whether you had breathing apparatus) because it is not matched by external atmospheric oxygen,\nwhen i is matched it is an equilibirum and so no exchange occurs", "982" ], [ "sorry man but if the basic concept of 'experience' doesn't apply in fantasy world(in your opinion),\nthen anything D & D has to say is also fairly irrelevant,\nget the point? you should - it's fairly basic.\n\n'experience' spans the real world _and_ fantasy worlds because it's a basic human concept with how we view reality\n\n\n > You're so adorable.\n\nyoure just arguing for the sake of it, nothing you said counters the original point made and you've added zero substance to the dicussion \n\nall of the points(if you can call them that) you made are opinions, with no backing in the story, eg;\n\n > PS.: <PERSON> shits all over <PERSON> and <PERSON> without even breaking a sweat.\n\nwhen? how? where? give me _any_ evidence of this bar your own fangirling.\n\nyou can't, this is pointless - you enjoy living up the fictional <PERSON>'s skirt - that's fine,\n\njust means there is nothing to be gained from talking to you", "248" ], [ "what is the relevance of that thread?\n\nhave you read it?\n\nthey're all mages at a base level because they can all _cast magic_,\nall the Thalassian Elves have innate magical ability,\n<PERSON> uses Arcane to grab and shield you in Pit of Saron(there are no Mages near her, only her Dark Rangers),\n<PERSON> can use magic,\n<PERSON> can use magic,\n<PERSON> can use magic,\n<PERSON> can use magic,\nthe Spellbreakers use magic,\n\nthe Blood Knights used their magic talent to acquire Holy infusion,\n\nthey all manipulate the Arcane in ways others can't (Arcane Torrent),\n\nthe Hunter ability Arcane Shot is a reference to this seeing as the main Ranger in the story was originally <PERSON>, Ranger General of Silvermoon.\nthose Elven Rangers use the Arcane to enhance their arrows", "1022" ], [ "ask <PERSON>, he was _killed_ by Orcs and still doesn't hold half the grudge the Night Elves do,\n\nit's not _their house_, it's land and the Night Elves do not have claim to the entirety of the Kalimdor continent, their home is Tel'drassil - they are xenophobic and insular,\nthey are most certainly not peace-loving hippies of the Warcraft world\n\nAshenvale literally borders Orgrimmar, your city will not last 5 minutes if you allow an enemy to hold settlements and areas that surround it.\n\n\ndon't bother with the; 'was here first' crap because if we follow that rule of thumb, it's the Trolls who were displaced by Night Elves", "436" ], [ "woah, alright mate \n\nyou didn't take in anything that was said there did you?\n\nNight Elves absolutely are xenophobic and insular, that's their identity.\n\n\n<PERSON> only attacked the Orcs because he thought they were Legion scouts, not because of whatever you said(using wood? look at Night Elf buildings)\n\n > meddle with the trees in Ashenvale\n\nlike i said, if you have a city that is surrounded on all sides by enemies, you will destroy them or force them out.\n\n\nif you want any clarification of what i have said please refer to;\n\n_URL_0_\n\nspecifically the part: Spirit within the Emerald Dream", "1022" ], [ "we are British and these are problems we experience,\n\ntherefore these would be _British Problems_,\n\nif all those other things were omitted it would likely be the same 4-5 concepts being posted _ad infinitum_\n\nit's a cultural thing, that minor complaint/social awkwardness is ingrained in our society,\n\nit may be _just awkward_ to people from other countries but it's part of our culture.\n\nit's really not that big of a deal, someone literally always says something to the theme of what you just said,\n\non nearly every single post\n\nwe get it", "579" ], [ "<PERSON> holy fuck - just read the goddamn page on Cenarius\n\ni am not engaging in hours of your petulant web of arguments regarding a slew of _other_ events.\n\n<PERSON> killed <PERSON>, <PERSON> changed his tune, <PERSON> doesn't hate them,\n\nergo his little Night Elf followers should imitate that\n\n\n\nthat's it, that was my original point and when you called for me to prove it; i did.\n\ni'm not letting myself get dragged into a mire of ambiguus opinions, meshed with aggression and call backs to nearly irrelevant shit,\njust because i provided a suitable answer to your incredulous demanding\n\n\nthanks", "212" ], [ "okay you're jumping the gun here,\ni didn't realise you were sarcasticly placing me in the firing line for the story writer's blame.\n\nno,none of that is my opinion.\n\nthe story has just begun - it's not going to be so obvious.\n\n<PERSON> has no reason to go all Lich King - she hates that concept more than anything,\n\nbut she is undead - she 'has no time for games' and has no time to pander to the feelings of the living when she has a mission to achieve,\n\na mission we haven't been made aware of because obviously that would undermine the entire point of a story,\n\nit's old god related, clearly, the Void hates <PERSON> and seems to be afraid of her in some way,\n\nwhich was why the whispers told <PERSON> to kill her with far greater intensity than when they suggested killing <PERSON>.\n\n\nthere's more to this story than that which is on the surface", "474" ], [ "> I would suggest you read the thread again.\n\nnotice how he is called out on that multiple times and does not offer a rebuttle?\n\n\nmage = magician = magi = someone who uses magic\n\nin Warcraft and other fantasy games being a learned Mage is the pinnacle, not just _being_ a Mage.\n\n'<PERSON>' isn't a special name for only the best of the best of magic users, it's an umbrella term for all of them\n\nand i'm clearly not saying that every single being that can use magic is suddenly on par with the greatest wizards or whatever, just because they _can_ use magic.\n\nlike very clear on that - for you to infer that from my words and then assume it is actually meant that way is, sorry, really stupid of you.\n\n\na Death Knight's Frost magic is different from a Mage's Frost the latter is powered by Arcane energy(all Mage class' spells are powered by Arcane), and the former is powered by Death energy(not a Mage but a Necromancer - which is the same except with Death magic).\n\nRogues use Shadow imbuement as Paladins do Light - they're not casting it in any traditional sense, ie; Rogues can't just summon a ball of Shadow and cast it at someone, but a Priest can", "310" ], [ "> Could you hazard a guess as to what they'll do with all those humans, dwarves and gnome corpses?\n\ni did in a thread not so long ago;\n\nthere is a great danger in the true war(against the Void) that if she had living allies they could be corrupted very easily and used to attack her,\n\nif they were all dead they'd be resistant to the Void\n\nan army of undead would appear to fare better against the Void than living beings would\n\n\nshe's undead and she's been to 'hell', she knows what awaits the world.\n\ni think she sees a bigger picture and cares very little for the feelings of the living because of it", "326" ], [ "it's not really a weak argument if it is known that the undead have a resistance to the Void by nature\n\n > the valkyr are gone\n\nthey aren't, there was at least 5 Val'kyr at the broken shore(but there would've been far more to airlift the Horde army out of there).\n\nshe has lost 4 of the original <PERSON> who took her place when she commit suicide, <PERSON> took her place when <PERSON> kills her, and <PERSON> is killed by Alliance),\n\nwhich likely means that the origingal 9 were greater <PERSON> and she still has mutliple lesser <PERSON> in her service,\nthese lesser Val'kyr can only raise Humans as Forsaken, they cannot take <PERSON>' place in the Shadowlands, greater Val'kyr _can_\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n_After the death of <PERSON>, only nine of the Scourge's val'kyr remained in the world. These nine, lead by <PERSON>, were bound to the will of their new dormant Lich King. Imprisoned atop the Icecrown, possibly for eternity, they hungered for their freedom. To gain this freedom they needed a vessel, one like them, a sister of war, strong, and who understood life and death. Someone who had seen the light and the dark. Someone worthy of power over life and death. <PERSON>, after having just committed suicide off the Frozen Throne, was shown what would happen to her people and herself if she was gone. Using this information, they convinced her to make a pact with them. In this pact the val'kyr would be free of the Lich King forever, but their souls would be bound to the Dark Lady. <PERSON> will walk with the living once again, but through the sisterhood of the val'kyr. As long as they live, so too will <PERSON>. All of them will have their freedom, life, and power over death_", "823" ], [ "> true sylvanas bias going on here\n\nwhat the hell are you talking about?\n\n > If you cant see what's wrong with this\n\nalright, what _is_ wrong with this? apart from 'feelings' or emotions\n\n > even weaker tactic\n\nit really isn't, suggest a better one.\n\n\n > <PERSON> put her on top of the pedestal because she is so popular.\n\nagain, what are you talking about here? her approval rating lately has dropped like a lead balloon,\n\nif you stop taking _everything_ at face value you might understand that it's all too blatant, there's clearly something else happening.\n\n\nthe more we talk the more you sound off like an anti-Sylvanas Alliance fanboy.\n\nnothing that could be said would move you from that way of thinking,\n\ni'm not even pro-Sylvanas here, i'm merely suggesting there's more to what is going on than Sylvanas becoming LK2.0", "759" ], [ "> Worgen are ALSO resistant to shadow magic\n\nyes but their resistance isn't called a resistance, it's a call to the fact they're an abberation, that gives them nature and shadow resistance because they're a comination of both,\n\nand why they typically cannot be raised into undeath\n\njust because someone hasn't suggested it doesn't mean it isn't true,\nwe see no instance of a Worgen falling to the Void but if we use basic logic we see that they have a hard time controliing the Worgen _rage_ let alone the pervasive manipulative whispers or control of the Void itself.\nForsaken don't have this problem, when they are sound of mind they don't feel overwhelming emotions, so they cannot be manipulated by them.\n\n\n > Cult of the Forgotten Shadow, have they had any lore since Classic?\n\nyes....", "1022" ], [ "the internet one is fairly irrelevant but the flies one is something im currently experiencing,\n\nwe are really not used to this kind of blazing weather, so we're not used to so many insects about,\n\ni understand that other people of other nations have this issue but for people to constantly point this out is just as bad - because they're always saying the same thing.\n\ni guess some people just want to talk to other British people in the time honoured UK way of complaining about minor things", "579" ], [ "> I'm saying <PERSON> isnt a good horde leader because. You argue her actions are justified. Im saying theyre not.\n\nthat is not even remotely the summary of this discussion\n\n\nit was more; you don't like <PERSON> right now, and i said there was likely a lot more going on that what we're seeing.\n\nyou have a polarised opinion and so you projected the opposite opnion on me; this happens with ridiculous frequency in this subreddit.\n\ni'm playing the advocate\n\n\ni nded up resorting to dimissing you as an Alliance fanby because all of your responses centered around how the Alliance races _feel_ and what is _right_ or _wrong_ from _their_ point of view, or when viewing _them_.\n\nall of that is irrelevant", "249" ], [ "it's not that you won't agree with me,\n\nit's that you still have a very very basic view of a polarised character.\n\ndespite all the things that have happened you are still basing your opinon of her on her actions in the very brief period of time from Legion going into BfA,\n\nmy point was to prvide you with the information in all of those instances that suggests she _had_ to do certain things, and that her priority is not with the morality of humans\n\n\nto summarise the whole point; wait befre you cast such damning judgement; the expansion hasn't even released yet", "474" ], [ "did you pay attention on the Skyfire?\n\nhe was looking for her specifically for revenge,\n\nhe was told by <PERSON> not to engange _anyone_ unless the situation DEMANDED it,\n\n<PERSON> then says ' i strongly suspect the situation will demand it'\n\nbecause they followed the Forsaken Flagship to kill <PERSON>,\n\nthe <PERSON> says something like 'i do not hunt without intending to kill my prey',\n\nso all he wanted to do was kill <PERSON>, he had _zero_ inclination of what she was doing in Stormheim because not even her own people did.\n\nbecause of that; loads of 7th Legion paratroopers were killed and the Alliance's Flagship Skyfire was destroyed.\n\nall because he wanted revenge at the expense of the greater war going on\n\n\ni'm not sure why people think her controlling Eyir would be a cataclysmic thing?\n\nshe already has greater <PERSON> in her pact - and the light Val'kyr did nothing to assist us against the Legion - nothing.\n\nthey only, like <PERSON>, protected the Halls of Valour", "212" ], [ "the Horde were brought by the Sin'dorei on their ships,\n\nthe Sin'dorei and Draenei are on fairly good terms(A'dal/the Sunwell),\n\nthey're just at odds because of the factions they're both on\n\n\n > that they have to rely on us to do anything\n\n\nwell the Draenei _did_ drag the Legion across the entire universe with them, destroying every planet and race they passed.\n\nit's only fair that they make the damn spaceship to ferry us all over to Argus to defeat <PERSON> - i mean, they've done absolutely nothing about the Legion but run and doing so ended the existences of billions and corrupted almost all else(Draenei are at fault for the corruption of the Orcs).\n\n\nI play <PERSON> so i have no major gripe with the Draenei", "521" ], [ "perhaps stabbing through the Maelstrom might've acheived that but we know from ancient times that there is an Old God presence that still taints <PERSON>, even after we beat <PERSON>, there's still _something_ there\n\n\n<PERSON> was angry and totally mental but he was single-minded in his quest to destroy all traces of the Void's corruption in world souls.\n\n\nbut he's not dead, maybe we'll get some information on that later, a letter from the seat of the pantheon xD", "823" ], [ "that' Scholazar basin/Wintergrasp, \n\nIIRC you enter the huge machine city thing that lies under Northrend and inside is a kind of shaft all the way down to her heart(i think? it wasn't explicitly stated),\n\nhe speaks to <PERSON> near a terminal but still miles above her heart - i'd assume her heart was in the direct centre of the globe, so the sword would strike it from any direction,\n\n\nbut from the lore we know <PERSON> literally cut a planet in half with that sword,\nthere must be a reason why he chose to stab it instead of utterly destroy it in one swing(aside from plot armour ofc)", "823" ] ]
110
[ 24254, 5815, 4810, 24780, 20248, 15166, 22988, 7076, 17344, 1293, 23236, 20104, 10710, 16651, 17026, 21623, 16146, 15982, 3787, 20103, 17391, 19549, 24092, 22529, 11532, 14088, 20047, 11872, 15536, 4368, 23733, 9959, 23651, 3664, 18605, 24602, 24549, 17024, 16016, 21898, 2586, 21849, 4591, 20344, 7989, 8864, 18989, 23913, 9295, 22383, 22441, 22892, 17941, 16247, 17823, 3311, 22229, 4730, 4745, 20984, 338, 995, 12921, 8591, 3483, 6237, 1785, 18130, 23082, 22505, 556, 16325, 18355, 502, 16766, 25123, 21473, 1620, 14252, 20758, 21260, 18171, 2885, 1416, 259, 25146, 10796, 10998, 1112, 24401, 20513, 4775, 23077, 18445, 20153, 20994, 8723, 14666, 18806, 24048, 947, 15568, 21981, 17743, 13650, 12186, 16482, 24478, 18708, 17770, 7639, 11717, 9446, 3901, 6114, 4343, 19620, 1759, 22165, 22647, 9458, 4748, 17917, 1893, 18448, 14185, 17875, 16507, 22100, 18098, 10513, 24760, 22667, 21188, 3077, 13552, 20425, 218, 25174, 11891, 25211, 23144, 2118, 24497, 6652, 2206, 8182, 17243, 9169, 19399, 9278, 9124, 954, 15002, 14925, 20709, 5376, 12932, 19648, 73, 13899, 463, 7228, 7310, 11558, 3881, 20335, 23446, 22212, 7853, 5853, 13042, 22686, 23682, 24013, 4476, 7391, 22765, 540, 22307, 756, 20267, 16155, 16754, 4493, 22928, 21180, 5623, 13516, 24214, 2423, 21073, 12145, 12250, 9022, 7417, 18740, 22028, 14766, 17426, 22577, 19922, 11069, 8455, 9877, 15003, 16871, 21003, 17442, 16440, 280, 15590, 8800, 22252, 17558, 5906, 8625, 21957, 14077, 16425, 22421, 7579, 22791, 5955, 10807, 25258, 3153, 4892, 4615, 10160, 1701, 3444, 16817, 14417, 23728, 5459, 17782, 11100, 12305, 7594, 24713, 23828, 18675, 16098, 25536, 23656, 8917, 13954, 16652, 12491, 15487, 11477, 18112, 13725, 14267, 5296, 18508, 9643, 25043, 12247, 2349, 21548, 5647, 23587, 14750, 11964, 18142, 3115, 3557, 24073, 24098, 18537, 5547, 21929, 6323, 11718, 21694, 21852, 19836, 9298, 18074, 16079, 23819, 3943, 17670, 12226, 6478, 22608, 11478, 10595, 22843, 17160, 6948, 8160, 25396, 12557, 16013, 5441, 12423, 20421, 25202, 4606, 16126, 6569, 17292, 10593, 10802, 19116, 1992, 12841, 3202, 8087, 2791, 21783, 15054, 15997, 2212, 5373, 2952, 25347, 21342, 18389, 12433, 22406, 20941, 11639, 6834, 8658, 23070, 19996, 22451, 3226, 17329, 15035, 13547, 543, 21826, 2875, 7910, 742, 23518, 23172, 3986, 6686, 19427, 17993, 11967, 18361, 23115, 8241, 9824, 17055, 12446, 21917, 18556, 10010, 3653, 5701, 11925, 8892, 10568, 22507, 5585, 24835, 11249, 22975, 13291, 16428, 24335, 17922, 12847, 2948, 10477, 20210, 14736, 10215, 9611, 3790, 20535, 3817, 5344, 20092, 15207, 20886, 23818, 7157, 3611, 9041, 23031, 16717, 3335, 20303, 7611, 4552, 16912, 20962, 23824, 8831, 15578, 3996, 18125, 14585, 23193, 14985, 25242, 17996, 12306, 20947, 16267, 3912, 6670, 5859, 25492, 16141, 18080, 4746, 10282, 12868, 15349, 21353, 12453, 1283, 17378, 21704, 24365, 1214, 18095, 13425, 12005, 11301, 24122, 18291, 10992, 23133, 20613, 23215, 7848, 15714, 15788, 22162, 6628, 15557, 17052, 19856, 1588, 1062, 4839, 23739, 16007, 9809, 762, 25036, 5595, 16664, 16476, 14578, 22996, 21138, 24725, 14112, 14358, 7754, 19927, 7518, 9268, 19169, 23832, 4215, 4273, 19793, 11954, 4723, 15996, 18087, 4241, 14488, 11282, 3639, 21582, 22534, 8057, 21941, 9627, 8579, 3172, 14808, 18893, 13129, 5784, 22206, 19938, 19864, 14280, 9915, 5740, 17835, 1998, 11971, 5874 ]
reddit_dump_-CJF-
[ [ "We're almost guaranteed a bill with $1200 stimulus checks and $600 enhanced unemployment in January or February if the democrats take the senate and the presidency. Likely the original HEROES Act.\n\nWe *might* get a bill with $1200 stimulus checks and $100-$300 enhanced unemployment in January or February if the democrats lose, but even this much would be contingent on the stock markets at that time and the bill will be stuffed with corporate bailouts for republican donors and interests and possible slush funds. It would also depend on whether or not the democrats could stoop to a low enough level to allow such a bill to pass the House.", "332" ], [ "I won't deny that getting <PERSON> out of office was the primary reason I voted for <PERSON> because it's true. Not that <PERSON> is bad, but as a progressive I really wanted <PERSON> more. However, I would've voted for almost anybody just to get <PERSON> out of office since he's a narcissist and a wannabe despot. That's not the type of person I feel comfortable having run the country.", "211" ], [ "? <PERSON> is not anti-cop or for looters. That's just <PERSON>'s fear-mongering. It's always fear with <PERSON> cause he has no merits to draw people in. He just spreads misinformation and lies. You will see for yourself because regardless of what <PERSON> says, <PERSON> **will** be the president on January 20th and society is not going to fall apart. The police will continue to operate and looters and rioters will not take over the country. If anything, *<PERSON>* made the rioting worse by sowing division over Twitter.", "220" ], [ "I agree with everything you said except to this day I still haven't heard a good excuse as to why she refused to piecemeal the stimulus checks and unemployment. The WH did suggest this and even if they would not have went through with it, why did she turn it down? Same thing with the problem solver's bill. If not for these two issues I'd be inclined to agree with you, but as it stands I really think the democrats need to pick a new speaker.\n\nEven if the republicans weren't serious about splitting the bill, the fact that she didn't take the opportunity to pass the ball to them is unforgivable. Now we get nothing until January, maybe not even then if the democrats don't win both seats in the runoffs.", "332" ], [ "I understand the republicans are shit and probably would've backed out of it anyway, but we'll never know since she never accepted the 'offer'. I just think it was very foolish on her part not to consider piecemeal on the stimulus and enhanced unemployment or the problem solvers bill because I don't think anyone would be blaming her right now if she had. It was a simple matter of passing the buck to the republicans by agreeing to it and when they backed out or tried to stuff in the liability protections, she could've called them out all over the media. I still haven't heard any good viable reason or excuse for it.", "557" ], [ "Yes, but the democrats could've came out looking like real advocates for the people if she hadn't written off the idea of piecemeal or dismissed the problem solvers' bill. Such a foolish thing to do politically and I honestly believe the democrats suffered for it in the election.\n\nJust to be clear, in no way am I absolving the GOP or <PERSON> of blame. They're easily the worst offenders, but I feel like <PERSON> missed a real opportunity by refusing the WH offer to separate the stimulus checks and the unemployment and by dismissing the problem solvers bill.", "557" ], [ "Fear-mongering is all they've got left to offer. They have no merits, nothing else to run on. Hopefully people are paying attention because everyone, regardless of party or policy differences, should be afraid of what the GOP is doing right now.\n\nIt is reasonable to debate on moral issues such as abortion, but there shouldn't be a debate about our democracy which is the framework of our country. Their silence is enabling <PERSON> and makes them complicit with his actions as he attempts to overturn the will of the people. If he were to be successful, what's left that separates him from a dictator and our country from fascism?", "604" ], [ "I don't know what they had in mind, but instead of crucifying piece meal on CNN she should've specifically stated what was wrong with the proposal if they were trying any shenanigans.\n\nFor example, when <PERSON> was talking about just pushing the stimulus checks, PPP and Unemployment, she should've said 'they want to put x in the bill also so it's unacceptable'.\n\nAt best, <PERSON> did a terrible job communicating with the American people about the issues with piecemeal/problem solvers bill and her own words made it sound like she's the one that had an issue with it.", "557" ], [ "Lol, idiots on marketwatch are freaking the fuck out over this idea. God forbid we pay people a fair wage that keeps up with inflation. And all the people on there are talking about replacing workers with automation and robots. If it were that easy they would've already done it, minimum wage increase or not.\n\nGod, I can't believe how many stupid mother fuckers we have on this planet.", "466" ], [ "I hope the Democrats are prepared to craft and pass the stimulus of all stimulus in January or February. It's going to need to be like, 6 to 10 trillion dollars to have a prayer of helping people.\n\nWe are 5 months overdue for the HEROES Act, and there's almost no chance we'll see relief in Nov, Dec, or Jan. The same $3.2T they wanted to pass back in May is not gonna cut it. We're gonna need a 3-in-1 bill by then.\n\nOn the plus side, the republicans basically just lost any chance they had of re-election. <PERSON> must really be doped up bad to make a mistake this big when the election is right at our doorstep. No clue what he's thinking right now.", "332" ], [ "On the plus side, he just fucked himself if he had any chance of re-election, and the entire GOP as well. He will not have a prayer at garnering any new support, and his base isn't enough to win re-election.\n\nOn the down side, he fucked us all on the way out. I hope the democrats are prepared to pass an enormous relief package in late January to early February. The HEROES Act is not even going to cut it by then.", "953" ], [ "It doesn't work like that. You can't flip a switch and restart the negotiations. The only hope of something getting passed now is if the republicans concede to the democrats every wish. Otherwise, <PERSON> will just defer to <PERSON>'s tweet. The republicans gave up any leverage they had here and no matter what, if something isn't passed, <PERSON> will be blamed.", "284" ], [ "His base isn't enough to get him re-elected. He needed crucial swing votes from people on the fence, and anyone on the fence most likely just fell over the other side after tonight.\n\nHis only chance at getting \"re-elected\" now is if he literally steals the election, and I'm hopeful that our country will band together and prevent that at all costs. Surely the democrats must be preparing for that possibility.", "953" ], [ "He didn't say he will send out $1200 checks through EO. He said if Congress sends him a stand alone bill for the stimulus checks he'd sign it immediately, but we already know that won't happen. If it were that simple, we would've had the checks months ago.\n\nThese negotiations were specifically because the democrats didn't want to piecemeal out the stimulus checks and the enhanced unemployment. If the democrats weren't going to go for $1.5T, why on earth would they go for this?\n\n<PERSON> is just trying to shift the burden back to the democrats, but it won't work.", "332" ], [ "The problem with waiting until February is that the stimulus that would be needed by then would be fucking astronomical. Like 2 HEROES Acts in one. We're already 5 months late on the stimulus (HEEROES Act was introduced in May 2020). Waiting until February 2021 is almost an entire year with no relief while the pandemic rages on.\n\nMeanwhile, people are still supporting themselves with debt and deferments. If a stimulus check were to be passed tomorrow, we'd still be $1200 behind since we're so late with this bill. If we have to wait until February 2021, the stimulus checks had better be for $3000+ or people are fucked.", "332" ], [ "I can't wait until November 1st to see the look on <PERSON>'s face when he gets fucking obliterated in the polls. It's got to be the biggest landslide in history...\n\n* He shifted the responsibility of the stimulus talks failure to himself with a Tweet.\n* Contracted COVID-19 and spread it all over the White House, shattering the illusion that all is A-OK.\n* Got shut down by the FDA on loosening restrictions, so no vaccine before the election as promised.\n* Tried to take healthcare from millions in the middle of a global pandemic.\n* Got himself impeached.\n* Undermined the CDC, FDA, his own task force, etc.\n* 210k Americans dead under his watch and counting.\n* \\- 10 million jobs.", "469" ], [ "Good luck with that.\n\nI mean, what's he going to do? Talk about how <PERSON> has infected the entire WH with COVID-19 and delivered the coup de grace to the economy in the space of 2 days?\n\n<PERSON> is even worse off in this debate than <PERSON> was in the last one. <PERSON> has all the same shitty values of the GOP but also has to answer for <PERSON>'s recent indefensible actions and he's a career politician so he won't even be able to talk over top of <PERSON> the entire time like <PERSON> did to <PERSON>.", "800" ], [ "If you can afford to do so comfortably, I would absolutely copy the data locally. I'm not saying it will be restricted at all, it's just better to be safe than sorry.\n\nUnfortunately I have 60 TB+ on GDrive so unless I want to drop $1200+, I just have to pray GSuite education isn't subject to the new limits. Unfortunately dropping that kind of money is not an option for me so I plan to just wait it out.", "448" ], [ "It's not really either or in terms of who has the blame. <PERSON> needs to be more flexible or nothing will get passed. <PERSON> is responsible for ending the talks and the GOP is responsible for not passing the HEROES Act or going up to $2.2T. The democrats can always come back and pass more stimulus in Jan/Feb, but right now we need something to get us by.\n\nI don't see the problem with the Problem Solver's Bill. It has, I think $400 EE + dual $1200 stimulus checks. Of course it might need some minor adjustments, but at this point we need to take what we can get because people won't last until Jan/Feb with no help.", "332" ], [ "There's a lot of questions that come to mind with that but the underlying argument does make sense from a political standpoint.\n\nHere's some concerns that come to mind though:\n\n* If that's true, that doesn't exactly paint the democrats in a positive light.\n* Why the deception and infighting when they could just state what you said in simple terms? Why would all democratic senators not be on the same side on this if it were true?\n* How would they decide who takes the heat for this and who gets a free boost in popularity among the electorate?\n* Why would they have 8 of them vote against it when that's more than needed to kill any chance of it passing, since it's clearly an unpopular choice with voters?\n\nIn any case, I do hope the democrats can find a way to pass stuff because excuses (even valid ones) aren't going to drive turnout. People want results. If the democrats don't deliver results, turnout will suffer and that's not going to be good for the congressional races. We already know the GOP is going to cheat this time around at unprecedented levels through gerrymandering and voter suppression. The democrats need to pull out all the stops and deliver, no matter what they have to do.", "284" ], [ "Yeah.. if they don't get rid of it, or at least agree to weaken it, the democrats are going to get straight up destroyed in the 2022 congressional races because:\n\n* As long as the filibuster is in place, the democrats will never, ever accomplish anything of substance. The republicans will vote against stuff even if it's not extreme just for the sole purpose of hurting their 2022 re-election chances.\n* The voting reform bill passed by the house MUST pass the senate or the democrats have no chance. Obviously it will not get any republican support so it's DOA in the senate unless they eliminate or weaken the filibuster to pass it.", "284" ], [ "What makes you think that? If they pass their voter reform bill it would go a long way in negating the GOP's voter suppression and gerrymandering B.S., and if they accomplish most of what <PERSON> promised, it would increase voter turnout.\n\nOn the other hand, if they get nothing done and let the GOP game the voting system, they're gonna lose because turnout will suffer and voting will be harder.", "845" ], [ "Well there's still time before the midterms to accomplish some of that, but not if they don't get rid of the filibuster.\n\nAs far as the $2,000 checks go, a lot of people think that was just bad messaging. In either case, I don't see that alone costing them the congress. Ditto with bombing Syria, although it seems to be an unpopular choice.\n\nThe $15 an hour minimum wage, health care reform, education reform, student debt forgiveness, and other issues that remain to be taken up by congress are more likely to have an impact imo, and that's problematic because NONE of this is getting done if they can't get rid of the filibuster.\n\nAnd like I said, the matter of the voter reform bill. Without that people couldn't vote the democrats in even if they wanted to, because the republicans are going to redistrict around democratic strongholds and make it harder to vote.", "332" ], [ "While I share your frustration, I don't think the democrats have lost just yet, but they will if they continue down this path. They must eliminate the filibuster and pass <PERSON>'s agenda that he ran on. People expect promises to be kept.\n\nOtherwise a combination of low voter turnout and voter suppression and gerrymandering are going to cost them to lose everything.", "953" ], [ "* Who says the republicans are going to take back over the senate?\n* The democrats could keep the senate, possibly indefinitely, if they deliver what the people want.\n* If the democrats want to deliver for people, they need to eliminate the source of the GOP's obstruction, which is the filibuster.\n* If the filibuster was a problem for the republicans, they could eliminate it at any time just the same as we can. It's not like the filibuster is safe if the democrats don't eliminate it.", "284" ], [ "The problem is that \\*attempts\\* to do something isn't enough to motivate voters. Results motivate voters. Seeing $10,000 removed from their student debt balance, seeing bigger paychecks because the minimum wage was raised, seeing $1400 checks arrive in the mail, being able to see a doctor when they're sick because they have health care coverage. That's what will lock in consistent and reliable voters.\n\nPromising to do something and then not getting it done is going to hurt turnout. Add that to the voter suppression and redistricting efforts on the GOP side and the democrats are going to have a tough time in 2022. That's why its important to eliminate the filibuster and find a way to get the more moderate/conservative democrats in line with <PERSON>'s agenda.", "953" ], [ "Getting rid of the filibuster isn't about dealing with <PERSON>. It's about being able to pass <PERSON>'s agenda through normal legislation. Things like education reform, healthcare reform, student debt forgiveness, student loan reform, police reform, etc. All of those promises are most likely not going to be allowed through reconciliation and none of them will have 60 votes to beat a filibuster.", "284" ], [ "But that's not a reason for you to be undecided about the need to remove it. That's a reason (and a valid one) why it might not *be removed*.\n\n<PERSON>'s platform might require some tweaking for <PERSON>, but I think they could still get a lot done with him there if they were to get rid of or at least weaken the filibuster enough to be able to get around the GOP. <PERSON> is a separate issue but I think if the whole party stood against him they could get him to fall in line with minimal concessions on their part.", "284" ], [ "I don't remember using the book at all for that one. Maybe just a glance at it to pick a graph algorithm for the project. I'm not sure if there are any good extra resources but the amount of Python required to complete the project is very low and can be picked up quickly on the fly, so I don't think a Udemy course would be necessary. If anything you may want to look for some resources that teach graph algorithms in Python.", "704" ], [ "The programming skills required for the project are pretty basic. If you completed SWI and SWII first I think you'll be fine. The hardest part for me was understanding what they actually wanted and building the whole system from scratch (the design of it, not the actual coding part) and figuring out which algorithms to use. I wasn't familiar with graphs so I remember using the book to examine the possible algorithms.\n\nThere's good write-ups on this sub about how to proceed, those are what I used. If you actually lack the programming fundamentals though, the book might be useful. I can't say one way or the other because I didn't read it since most people seem to think it's a waste of time.", "704" ], [ "And unlike most situations, I can totally understand the opposing view. It doesn't make those people any less wrong, but I can sympathize and understand why they feel that way. After all, it's their livelihoods at stake.\n\nStill though, <PERSON> has to do what's best for humanity as a whole and we haven't got any time to lose if we want to even have a chance at reversing the damage done.", "647" ], [ "It's going to depend on the results of the election. If the democrats take the senate and win the presidency, then they'll be able to pass anything they want. Whether or not they will honestly pass that will depend, but I'd say the probably is high if the election goes that way. There may be other ways through executive orders or the secretary of education as listed elsewhere in this topic, but I honestly have no clue about how that would work.", "284" ], [ "People were pissed at the GOP for that but that was then and this is now. She's turning down every single bill. At first it was reasonable because the offers were shitty, but she's turned down some offers that, while not perfect, would've been good enough to get us through. $1.5T. $1.6T. $1.8T.\n\nIf language is the problem, she needs to explicitly point out what the problem is. I could understand it if it were for the liability protections, but she never even mentions that. It's always about \"lack of a concrete testing plan\" or some other bullshit we can fix later with a democratic sweep. What we won't be able to fix is the financial ruin millions of Americans will endure if we have to wait until February 2021 for help.", "332" ], [ "Nobody blames her for trying to get more aid, but there is a point where you have to compromise with the other side. If she keeps it up, she's going to fuck us out of $1.62 trillion dollars worth of aid and we'll get nothing.\n\nIs it an ideal amount of money? Hell no. We needed the full amount of money in the HEROES Act way back in May... but when you're hurting, you don't leave money on the table. The $400 EE + $1200 stimulus would help a lot of people right now, while preventing a chain of god knows how many more layoffs starting from the airline industry.\n\nThe democratic package in May was relevant in May, June, and July, but since negotiations began with the WH, it's been irrelevant. That package is dead. The democrats know it's dead. It does us no good now. Yes, it's the republicans fault for not passing it, but that just makes it all the more important for her to work with them on this package to pass real relief for people, not a fantasy bill.\n\nThe $2.2T package the house passed today was symbolic and doesn't help anyone as it will never pass the senate. It's just as bad as the republicans trying to push through the skinny bill. Legislation that is designed to fail is a waste of everyone's time.", "332" ], [ "Personally I'm not telling <PERSON> to pass the $2.2T deal because of the following:\n\n1. <PERSON> is not the primary negotiator on this particular deal. It's <PERSON> and <PERSON> with the White House. When <PERSON> becomes the primary point of blockage he'll get plenty of heat again, don't worry.\n2. I expect more out of democrats than republicans because I already know the republicans don't want to pass relief. They don't even want to pass the $1.62T let alone $2.2T. I think the democrats do want to help people, but they're going to fuck us out of $1.62T while shooting for the moon.\n3. Time is running out to get a deal done. I know we will get nothing if it's not passed before the election. Think about it. Do you think the republicans will pass ANY bill without the pressures of the election looming over their heads? Do you think <PERSON> would not veto it if he loses or if he wins regardless?\n4. $1.62T is what we could have right now. That's not ideal, but it's enough to help people until the election is decided and we (hopefully) get a new president and administration. $600 EE was good and I would renew it in a heartbeat if I had the power, but it was also more than needed for most needy people. There is some income discrepancy in high COL places, but overall it's enough to get us by along with the $1200 stimulus checks.", "332" ], [ "Maybe. Enlighten me, but I already know there's tax cuts for the rich in there, and I doubt there's anything in there that would change my view given the alternative of passing nothing while people are being evicted by the thousands every day and lining up at food banks. Can you imagine how this is going to be 3 months from now? People are going to spend Christmas in the streets over this shit.", "683" ], [ "It's not just a fellow democrat, it's one of the most powerful democrats in politics who has the power to help the people and she's playing politics. It's bullshit.\n\nI had a much higher opinion of <PERSON> until she started turning down every bill. It started to get ridiculous after they offered $1.3T, $400 EE and $1200 stimulus checks. Yeah, I'm sure the GOP has some bullshit in there, but if it keeps people eating and off the streets without throwing them under the bus with liability protections, I can live with that.\n\nHolding out for shit like money for elections is pointless. We won't get a deal at all if she waits for that, and the election will proceed with or without it anyway. We can't nitpick if we want something to happen.\n\nAlso, if she really wants a deal she needs to spend more than 30 minutes a day on it. They should be on the phone for hours hashing out a deal. There's only a couple of weeks left to make one.", "332" ], [ "It's a tuple because it's surrounded with parenthesis, which in Python is syntax for tuple. Tuples are like lists but are immutable, which means you can't change that particular instance of the tuple after it's created.\n\nCompare this to the syntax for lists, which uses square brackets such as \\[ \\]. You might be confused because of the large block of code, but they're only showing it for context. All you really need to read is the initial question.", "446" ], [ "If you did 50 credits in one semester, you can definitely finish in a year if you really want to. I have four courses left and I only did 30 credits in a semester. Software II was rough for me also, but I think it also depends on your expectations. It kind of sounds like you were a hyper-accelerator so you probably thought you could do it in a few days or a week. That class took me almost a month. I think if you set realistic goals for the harder classes and take it one class at a time you'll have no problem.", "492" ], [ "My pell grant award shows up under \"Financial Services - My Account\" under payments for the next award year, but it doesn't show up under \"Financial Aid Progress\" and it says \" File Review and Processing .\"\n\nI think they might just be slow on the processing. I've emailed financial aid several times and they told me I'm eligible and I don't need to do anything else. However, they did tell me that if after 60 days the aid hasn't been processed, I could get a financial hold put on my account. I'm not sure how that's fair since there's literally nothing I can do about their processing speed, but hopefully it goes through in time.\n\nMy next term starts in 18 days so... I'm going to call them tomorrow.", "691" ], [ "I'm not sure if I qualify since I'm not knocking down classes in a matter of days, but I guess technically I do. I'm doing BSCS and cleared 30 CU in my first term with 18 days to spare. I could've done more but I would've sacrificed my mental health in the process. I took a week break (while enrolled in classes) here and there. I don't currently have a job. Hardest classes were probably Operating Systems for Programmers and Data Structures and Algorithms II.\n\nTips:\n\n* Always search your program's subreddit for the course number/name to read about other people's previous experience and tips before getting started. Some of the tips are really useful. Take notes on these.\n* Take a quick glance through the course chatter afterwards to catch even more tips and pitfalls. Sometimes people post things to look out for on the evaluations which can help prevent getting your PA returned to you, saving valuable time. Take notes on these.\n* Join your program's discord. Fellow students are always helpful.\n* For PA's, make sure you always check your finished assignment against the rubric before submission. Be relatively confident you have met all of the requirements. So far I haven't had any PA's returned using this strategy so I would say it works well.", "401" ], [ "<PERSON> is right and <PERSON> is wrong. Congress needs to come together for the good of the people and the country and make a deal this week. Otherwise there won't be a stimulus package until February 2021 in the best case scenario. Being passive aggressive about the issue isn't going to help anything. She came on CNN expecting a free pass and got told. Party aside, a lot of people are fed up with Congress right now. They are not doing their job.", "332" ], [ "<PERSON> was the problem, but negotiations between <PERSON> and <PERSON> have been ongoing for months. <PERSON> has the ball right now. When <PERSON> and <PERSON> reach an agreement and the Senate refuses to bring it to vote or votes it down, then they'll get the heat. Until then <PERSON> will have to deal with this.\n\nAnd this is not a discussion of party. I voted for <PERSON>, but that doesn't mean every democrat gets a free pass with me. I call out bullshit when I see it regardless of if it's red or blue.", "850" ], [ "But they're not at the table now. There's no way the GOP will ever be on board with the stimulus <PERSON> wants (and that we need), but something is better than nothing. Separate those things out and then hope for a blue sweep. Anything less and we won't get another stimulus anyway.\n\nIf <PERSON> loses the presidency, we all know he's going to veto any stimulus bills. He's not going to help set <PERSON> up for an economic recovery on the way out. If the GOP keeps the senate, we'll be in the same spot we are now but without the pressures of the election.", "953" ], [ "I'm sure there's bullshit relief in there for billionaires, but there's also $400 enhanced unemployment, $1200 stimulus checks, money for state and local government (although not as much as <PERSON> wants), money for back rent, etc.\n\nThe alternative is no bill. $400 a wk extra + $1200 stimulus checks is better than nothing to people who can't eat or pay their bills. If the democrats win everything they can pass another bill in February, but there's going to be hundreds of thousands if not millions evicted or starving by then if they don't come to an agreement.\n\nAs long as liability protections aren't in the bill, they will likely have to accept some bullshit.", "332" ], [ "It's not really 'rushing the bill'... this may be our only chance at a relief bill.\n\n* Nothing will be passed from Nov. 3rd to February 1st in the lame duck period.\n* Nothing will be passed if <PERSON> wins.\n* Nothing will be passed if the republicans keep the Senate, or at least nothing better than we could get right now.\n\nOur only other chance is a blue wave.", "953" ], [ "If an agreement isn't reached this week, I don't see how there can be a bill before the election. There simply isn't time. Neither side seems close to caving. I personally think we won't get a bill until February 2021. I don't think anyone benefits from that.\n\nI was under the impression that the current bill has $400 unemployment and $1200 stimulus checks. That's more than a month's worth of money if so.\n\nIn regards to whether or not a bill would increase the GOP's chances of keeping the senate, I don't know. Personally I think it would be fucked up to leverage people's aid for a political win so whether it helps the GOP or not is irrelevant to me.", "332" ], [ "It's not partisan. It's essential for our democracy. He didn't question the election results, he spread a conspiracy theory about widespread voter fraud (in the millions) and began doing so before the election even started. His claims had no basis in reality. His own republican-stacked courts turned him away.\n\n... and no other politician in modern history, republican or democrat, has ever done what <PERSON> did. Not <PERSON>, or any other democrat or republican.", "210" ], [ "If the democrats had allowed that to go in the bill, it would've given legitimacy in some form to his false claims. He already exhausted all of his legal options. His own supreme court turned him away. He had no proof and no case, plain and simple.\n\nAnd claiming Russian interference in the election--which is actually true, it doesn't mean the democrats would've won in 2016 or that the republicans had ANYTHING to do with it, but all of our intelligence officials say that the Russians did indeed interfere--is not the same thing as inciting a violent mob by spreading totally bogus claims leading to an attack on Congress resulting in the death of 5 people.\n\nThe truth is, <PERSON> is a narcissist that can't even admit to himself that he lost, because he loves himself so much. Republicans should be eager to distance the party from him like <PERSON> is.\n\nEdit: BTW, the democrats are working on stimulus simultaneously. That's why <PERSON>'s unveiling his stimulus plan today.", "800" ], [ "You make it sound like <PERSON> didn't have his day in court. He had many, and state after state turned down his baseless allegations. His own republican-stacked supreme court turned down his bogus claims. If <PERSON> is so sure there was fraud, why does he need an investigation? Provide the proof or STFU on the baseless claims that result in events like occurred on the 6th.\n\nAnd the democrats can fulfill their constitutional duty of impeaching the fuck out of <PERSON> while still providing stimulus and passing other legislation. Remember this conversation when you receive your $1400 courtesy of the democrats.", "210" ], [ "<PERSON>, <PERSON> and the rest of the politicians that referred to these as \"$2000 stimulus checks\" deserve all the flack they're about to receive from the progressive left. Either you don't know how to speak or you purposely deceived the American people. I don't like the implications of either one.\n\nAt this rate, why not call them $3200 stimulus checks? The $1200 we received back in May + the $600 from December and the $1400 in <PERSON>'s proposal?", "332" ], [ "It's a shame. <PERSON> is going to lose a lot of the goodwill he would've otherwise got for this because he keeps calling these $2000 checks, not $1400 checks. It's deceptive, intentional or not because we already got the $600.\n\nHe deserves all the flack he's gonna get from the progressive left for this. Democrats needs to be very careful with their promises because people are vulnerable after 4 years of <PERSON> and the GOP obstruction.", "332" ], [ "On the night before the runoffs in Georgia, <PERSON> said:\n\n[By electing <PERSON> and the Reverend, you can make an immediate difference in your own lives, the lives of people all across this country, because their election will put an end to the block in Washington of that $2,000 stimulus check, that money that will go out the door immediately to help people who are in real trouble. Think about \\[? what it ?\\] will mean, to your lives, putting food on the table, paying rent, paying your mortgage, paying down the credit card, paying the phone bill, the gas bill, the electric bill.](_URL_0_)\n\n[And that's not an exaggeration. That is a literal-- that's literally true. If you send <PERSON> and the Reverend to Washington, those $2,000 checks will go out the door, restoring hope and decency and honor for so many people who are struggling right now. And if you send senators <PERSON> and <PERSON> back to Washington, those checks will never get there. It's just that simple. The power is literally in your hands.](_URL_0_)\n\nHowever at this time, $600 had already been passed in Congress for weeks, so it was deceiving at best.", "332" ], [ "$600 that was contingent on nothing because it already passed. Here's a quote from <PERSON> *after* the $900b package with the $600 checks in it had already passed Congress, given on the night before the runoffs in Georgia:\n\n[And that's not an exaggeration. That is a literal-- that's literally true. If you send <PERSON> and the Reverend to Washington, those $2,000 checks will go out the door, restoring hope and decency and honor for so many people who are struggling right now. And if you send senators <PERSON> and <PERSON> back to Washington, those checks will never get there. It's just that simple. The power is literally in your hands.](_URL_0_)\n\nAt the time he said this, $600 had already passed. The democrats could've said \"$1400 more will go out the door\" or \"we'll send the difference\", etc. They need to work on the messaging.", "332" ], [ "It's deceptive because of the way it was worded. <PERSON>, <PERSON> and others continued to say we'd get $2000 stimulus checks even after the $600 had been passed, and in some cases, received.\n\nDon't get me wrong, $1400 is still amazing and it's better than the $0 we would've got with <PERSON> in the Senate, and yet I still feel cheated. That should tell you something about the messaging used. Wording matters. The democrats really need to learn this NOW. This money should be a great thing, yet many people are fucking pissed off because they were expecting $2000. They should've just said in the beginning, \"$1400 stimulus checks will go out the door to bring you up to the $2000 you deserve\" or something along those lines.\n\nAs I said before, this is $1400, not $2000. Because $600 had already passed.", "332" ], [ "Actually, democrats had $0 stimulus checks in the bill because they knew <PERSON> would never allowed it to pass.\n\nThen <PERSON> tweeted about $2k stimulus checks to try to win brownie points with people and <PERSON> threw $600 in to try to win Georgia for the republicans.\n\n<PERSON> tried to get it upped to $2000 but failed.\n\n$600 was signed into law.\n\nThen democrats continued to talk about the need to pass $2000 stimulus checks. Well by that logic, we didn't need to pass $2000 stimulus checks, because $600 checks had just passed into law. We needed to pass $1400 checks. The wording matters.", "332" ], [ "Here's what you said:\n\n > The method the 900bln bill used to pay out that $600 was through activating an emergency payout option from a decades old bill that listed a $600 payout. The legislation for the $2000 checks amended that bill to increase the emergency payout parameters. \n > \n > If it had been passed prior to the payout, the checks would have been for $2000.\n\nHow is that at all clear by what <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and many other high profile lawmakers have been saying? The American people should not need to understand how legislation works to interpret a message that should be clear to ordinary people.\n\nI'm telling you the democrats had many people (including myself) thinking they're getting $2000 when they're getting $1400. It's a messaging problem and they had better work on it or they're going to lose seats for no reason. \n\nThey have a very narrow majority in the Senate. I would like to see them keep that majority in 2022. If they continue to misrepresent what they're going to do, they will lose the majority and we'll be back ti Senate Majority Leader <PERSON> obstructing everything.", "332" ], [ "There is a difference, hence this discussion.\n\nThe $600 was already locked in. It was part of legislation that was already passed, yet they continued to talk about how $2000 checks would go out the door immediately if they win in Georgia. What they should've said is $1400 will go out the door immediately.\n\nTo be clear, the democrats are still great for making up for the republicans shortcomings, but they really fucked up the messaging and a lot of people are upset as a result.", "332" ], [ "That was when we were negotiating **with republicans** on the $900b bill. <PERSON> and <PERSON> referred to these as $2000 checks *after* that legislation had already been passed. It is not at all clear.\n\nThe only way for <PERSON> to rectify this now is to amend his bill to include $2000. Otherwise he's going back on his promise to Georgia and I think that could cost us the Senate in 2022. People don't like being lied to, even if $1400 is still better than the $0 we would've got with the GOP.\n\nNot that people who voted blue will vote red, but it will hinder turnout which is essential for defeating the GOP.", "332" ], [ "If I thought stimulus was coming in January, I would at least feel better about being in debt up to my eyeballs. But I don't, because:\n\n* Even with <PERSON> in office pushing a stimulus bill hard, he can't really force <PERSON> to do anything.\n* Even if we get a stimulus bill, it won't be adequate to meet the needs of the people. That would require $3600 direct payments to individuals, retroactive unemployment back to July, and a fund to pay everyone's back rent. If we get another single $1200 stimulus check it'll be a miracle.", "332" ], [ "A UBI would be **so much** better, but as others have already pointed out, that has zero chance of passing the Senate. <PERSON> would never even bring such a bill to vote. If the democrats take the Senate in January and are willing to eliminate the filibuster, then *maybe*.\n\nBut then again, as has been pointed out to me by others on here, eliminating the filibuster could be a nightmare in the future if republicans gain control. I'm still not necessarily against it, just not sure if it could come back to bite us in the ass later.\n\nI personally would be all for a UBI instead of student debt forgiveness. I'd just pay my student loans with the extra money from the UBI until it's wiped out.\n\nIn either case, if <PERSON> can forgive student loan debt via EO, he needs to at ***minimum*** eliminate the $10k he was pushing for while campaigning, otherwise it will hurt his credibility and damage the democrats in future races. That, combined with his reforms to IBR and PSLF and making college free would be a game changer.", "284" ], [ "You also have no loans anymore though. There's people without a job due to COVID-19 AND with the burden of student loan debt.\n\nThe fact remains that <PERSON> has the power to unilaterally ease that pain but I don't think he can unilaterally appropriate funds to reimburse people for their payments, because only Congress can appropriate funds. Even if he could, the logistics involved would make it difficult, and where would you draw the line? 2010? 1980?\n\nNow, that's not to say that the government shouldn't provide relief besides student loans... just in addition to. All workers should be getting enhanced unemployment retroactive to July and all Americans should get $3600 stimulus checks.", "683" ], [ "Sounds like you're talking about targeted relief/means testing. That won't work. Again, logistics. And time... it took what, 6 months for everyone to get the first stimulus checks? Some are still waiting. People have been waiting on Congress since July (well, actually May, but benefits started expiring in July). If relief came tomorrow, it'd be too late for millions. Pushing it out for months to means test would just increase the pain.\n\nBesides, the real problem with the first bill was that there were too many loopholes for the rich. Most of the blanket aid to regular Americans was fine.", "332" ], [ "Both Congress and the President have failed huge with this entire pandemic situation. The first and foremost responsibility of the government is to protect the health and safety of the people.\n\nUnfortunately this administration made a huge mistake and vastly underestimated the virus early on, ignoring warnings from experts in February and March. After it became evident they fucked up, instead of taking immediate action to mitigate the damage to people's health they chose to mitigate the damage to their political careers by attempting to sweep the issue under the rug. They undermined their own health experts, politicized masks (the one easy thing they could do to mitigate the virus spread), held super-spreader events, sowed doubt in our institutions (CDC, FDA, etc) and filled people with hatred and doubt.\n\nOn Congress' side, they let their petty political games get in the way of helping people. Also, senate republicans were complicit by supporting <PERSON>'s bat shit conspiracy theories.\n\nThe federal government has without a doubt failed its people. The only shining stars are some local governors with good sense like Michigan and New York.", "19" ], [ "Well I was going to write up a big post on why we don't have many options, but I'll save you the trouble of reading it.\n\nThe tl;dr of the situation as I see it, realistically, is that the democrats **have** to win those 2 seats in the Georgia runoffs in January. Then they can push through adequate aid without obstruction from the republicans. They might have to be willing to eliminate the filibuster to do it though.\n\nBarring that, we really don't have many realistic choices. The second amendment here is not a realistic choice. We can protest, but they'll just ignore it like they've been doing.", "284" ], [ "You can accelerate. I've never worked in tech or CS (although I did complete a degree in CS at community college...) and I completed 30 CUs last term and took the last two weeks off because I was afraid to start another class and not finish by the end of the term. They weren't all easy courses either.\n\n* Ethics in Tech (easy)\n* Software I (easy to medium)\n* Data Structures and Algorithms I (fairly easy, not ethics in tech easy though)\n* Software II (medium to hard)\n* Operating Systems for Programmers (hard -- too much info!)\n* Data Structures and Algorithms II (hard -- difficult to get started, medium once you got a solid framework established)\n* Software Engineering (easy)\n\nI could've easily completed more than this, but I transferred in all the easier courses. If you're starting fresh you could probably knock out 50 or 60 CUs in 1 term, assuming you have the fundamentals down.", "704" ], [ "This is precisely the problem. Some industries are absolutely fucked (travel, for example) while others have made the move to virtual and are mostly fine for now. Millions got called back to work and are doing fine, but most of the poor people and part of the middle class got shifted to total poverty in the process and Congress isn't doing shit about it.\n\nA lot of it is also an illusion because there's still lots of debt and rent currently going unpaid.", "479" ], [ "Honestly, I'm new to politics but I feel like the republicans let things go too far this time. The GOP might eventually recover but I have enough faith in our country and its people to believe that its going to be a long, long time before we see another republican president.\n\n<PERSON> and his enablers have done irreparable damage to their party by their mishandling of the virus, spreading of hate/fearmongering and ridiculous conspiracy theories.", "800" ], [ "I'm not 100% sure what you're asking but here's some information that might help.\n\nI got my associates of applied science in CS and transferred to WGU. I transferred in a lot more classes by having a full degree than I would have otherwise. I didn't originally plan to go to WGU though. In fact, I had no idea it existed. If I had known about WGU and the ability to accelerate, I'm not sure if I would've spent 3 years at community college and dealt with the scheduling conflicts I faced due to transportation. I was able to complete 30 credits in one semester at WGU.\n\nShe can look up the transfer guide for her college by going to [_URL_1_](_URL_0_), selecting her state, and then selecting her college. I would explore the UT website for that school. Also, community colleges usually have transfer agreements and counselors/advisors as well. I went to a no-name community college and they had advisors. I'd be very surprised if her college didn't have advisors to help with stuff like this. She can also contact WGU or UT directly and get help.", "688" ] ]
435
[ 5931, 15535, 4, 18477, 15255, 2225, 18301, 14598, 21317, 5572, 12038, 6415, 16286, 6083, 7944, 22816, 19043, 11837, 13179, 408, 19312, 18400, 5939, 11302, 10483, 61, 2970, 10837, 17210, 8806, 8838, 23565, 23053, 16744, 7402, 9419, 19095, 16724, 8351, 6361, 6006, 14522, 6277, 22814, 23093, 15254, 19433, 22149, 13573, 6961, 6850, 18914, 23820, 4609, 18061, 24314, 21156, 639, 14448, 18807, 19567, 16073, 18681, 12783, 3967, 21648, 2935, 8134, 16786, 25268, 19514, 17818, 17773, 16447, 15915, 12479, 15653, 11551, 11863, 23894, 21293, 13608, 3501, 13908, 10151, 11141, 22830, 21659, 11412, 11831, 12691, 15006, 10416, 20316, 19966, 18778, 20970, 22567, 21680, 15409, 19526, 3828, 16033, 10720, 2144, 20038, 8980, 12072, 9920, 16182, 23826, 9523, 9843, 6877, 12920, 22419, 12800, 22725, 4163, 11805, 2314, 8993, 12907, 25024, 223, 14087, 22552, 14164, 15615, 21007, 14791, 18718, 15807, 2403, 12939, 24424, 14676, 15062, 16411, 3849, 13630, 22347, 14821, 3197, 4362, 7695, 1079, 9913, 12308, 1192, 12448, 19850, 19339, 18867, 6262, 1254, 13928, 24593, 20145, 24083, 5561, 24113, 21730, 11874, 15401, 19329, 23337, 3566, 633, 752, 4004, 13755, 3804, 18390, 13120, 1723, 17997, 19494, 19553, 17599, 16387, 12581, 19687, 1165, 19559, 12626, 17541, 21229, 23806, 6402, 4224, 10002, 15823, 18333, 17910, 135, 23163, 19165, 367, 12793, 23124, 12650, 25350, 4248, 18562, 7629, 21083, 9244, 20801, 5713, 22506, 8732, 23188, 21038, 11317, 5500, 8217, 1203, 11398, 20988, 12413, 24834, 22648, 15092, 16173, 13767, 7034, 5968, 10996, 1878, 25508, 20858, 17821, 12059, 12990, 23629, 6587, 21667, 19389, 1580, 13094, 3785, 3861, 6731, 10162, 14896, 16189, 8384, 4774, 19234, 9370, 11016, 6672, 14226, 23533, 19259, 1881, 18182, 5471, 17840, 2249, 15973, 2960, 18523, 12205, 8817, 7613, 10465, 3279, 19668, 19740, 17826, 1778, 23080, 11491, 10063, 19425, 8851, 12877, 23579, 13701, 184, 17056, 19945, 1245, 8540, 1994, 22086, 18692, 24247, 851, 20188, 1037, 8520, 13453, 13411, 16047, 10074, 21742, 21120, 13398, 20603, 25066, 22688, 25096, 24390, 24766, 6434, 5142, 1678, 20279, 10907, 10108, 12984, 21590, 12382, 6555, 13528, 7516, 16091, 22424, 9690, 16096, 9264, 1496, 19429, 12999, 16628, 10868, 8764, 10497, 11038, 10744, 23655, 13082, 12136, 13655, 17410, 25134, 6959, 14582, 22515, 23928, 7364, 8751, 16030, 19497, 4529, 5729, 20628, 19223, 18787, 15922, 17300, 19588, 16344, 18689, 3092, 6397, 16244, 21005, 21932, 10724, 18309, 14378, 1796, 513, 16666, 22589, 22327, 1729, 16015, 8742, 598, 14276, 21190, 16577, 21723, 4699, 19831, 20072, 22828, 4132, 163, 12515, 2633, 5103, 24942, 6038, 16609, 23388, 12744, 11688, 21719, 19256, 18421, 15992, 18958, 9372, 18090, 23265, 20289, 18831, 25483, 1146, 11437, 18059, 2300, 11972, 24072, 4876, 10082, 6335, 141, 23216, 5695, 20440, 10228, 4387, 2846, 13342, 16510, 6710, 4208, 17177, 23571, 9082, 16378, 23420, 18230, 6833, 1229, 2127, 22411, 24693, 4844, 22604, 3259, 1560, 16403, 5804, 20330, 2832, 10968, 11723, 24686, 14346, 16256, 15346, 17497, 21460, 50, 8674, 5468, 22886, 13625, 7590, 14352, 22366, 20368, 6726, 2089, 3699, 15259, 9526, 2053, 16960, 490, 19724, 10745, 13059, 361, 12926, 19951, 1464, 6969, 1202, 6303, 2351, 2516, 5073, 14948, 13208, 24646, 22924, 24295, 4797, 2748, 11810, 10254, 16167, 12776, 19639, 3286, 5588, 2918, 9287, 11133, 20451 ]
reddit_dump_-Caesar
[ [ "Feelings have nothing to do with it. How is having or not having a flair on this subreddit at all affecting history? I'm not saying the game should be censored and not include the Waffen SS, I would never try to take away from the historical accuracy of a legitimate/artistic depiction of historical events. \n\nHowever, this subreddit isn't that. The flair is clearly just so a bunch of people can signal *something* (I won't say exactly what they're signalling, though I have a few ideas), and I think that's inappropriate, ignorant and ought not to be supported by this subreddit.", "342" ], [ "> According to the Modern Genocide: The Definitive Resource and Document Collection, the Waffen-SS had played a \"paramount role\" in the ideological war of extermination (Vernichtungskrieg), and not just as frontline or rear area security formations: a third of the Einsatzgruppen (mobile killing squads) members which were responsible for mass murder, especially of Jews, Slavs and communists, had been recruited from Waffen-SS personnel prior to the invasion of the Soviet Union. The Waffen-SS construction office built the gas chambers at Auschwitz, and, according to <PERSON>, about 7,000 served as guards at that camp.\n\nNot all Waffen SS members may have personally participated, but the scale of the war crimes/crimes against humanity committed by all the other Waffen SS members colours the entire organisation. As I said before, it was the military wing of the racist Nazi party.", "55" ], [ "Not at all relevant. I'll note that your link pertains to ALL US servicemen, not just rapes committed by the US Airborne, and I'd also bet money that the Wehrmacht and other Nazi organisations committed far more rapes during the war so I don't really see your point. \n\nIn any case, as I noted above, just because one side also does some wrong/bad things IS NOT an excuse for the other side. The Waffen SS doesn't get a free pass for literally participating in genocide just because US servicemen raped a few thousand people (as horrible as that is).", "454" ], [ "> Many Waffen-SS members and units were responsible for war crimes against civilians and allied servicemen. After the war the SS organisation as a whole was held to be a criminal organisation by the post-war German government. Formations such as the Dirlewanger and Kaminski Brigades were singled out, and many others participated in large-scale massacres or smaller-scale killings such as murder of 34 captured allied servicemen ordered by <PERSON> during Operation Bulbasket in 1944, the Houtman affair, or murders perpetrated by <PERSON>. The listed Waffen-SS units were responsible for the following massacres:\n\n > - Wormhoudt massacre by SS Leibstandarte <PERSON>, 1940, France\n- Le Paradis massacre by SS Division Totenkopf, 1940, France\n- Pripyat swamps (punitive operation) by the SS Cavalry Brigade, 1941, USSR\n- Ascq massacre by 12th SS Panzer Division Hitlerjugend, 1944, France\n- Tulle massacre by SS Division Das Reich, 1944, France\n- Oradour-sur-Glane massacre by SS Division Das Reich, 1944, France (Burned out cars and buildings still litter the remains of the original village in Oradour-sur-Glane, as left by Das Reich SS division)\n- Ochota massacre by SS Kaminski Brigade, 1944, Poland\n- Wola massacre by SS-Sturmbrigade Dirlewanger, 1944, Poland\n- Huta Pieniacka massacre by SS Division Galicia 1944, Poland\n- Graignes Massacre by SS Division <PERSON>, 1944, France\n- Maillé massacre, also by SS Division Götz von Berlichingen, 1944, France\n- Marzabotto massacre by 16th SS Panzergrenadier Division Reichsführer-SS, 1944, Italy\n- Malmedy massacre by <PERSON>, part of 1st SS Panzer Division, 1944, Belgium\n- Ardeatine massacre by two SS officers, 1944, Italy\n- Distomo massacre by 4th SS Polizei Division, 1944, Greece\n- Sant'Anna di Stazzema massacre by 16th SS Panzergrenadier Division Reichsführer-SS, 1944, Italy\n- Ardenne Abbey massacre by 12th SS Panzer Division Hitlerjugend, 1944, France\n\nI'm not going to post evidence of rape by the Wehrmacht, not because such evidence doesn't exist but because: (1) this discussion is not about the Wehrmacht; and (2) it's irrelevant, it doesn't justify or excuse the immoral crimes of the Allies or the Axis.\n\nBut anyway, it certainly seems to me like a significant enough part of the Waffen SS was complicit in war crimes and crimes against humanity. That was the conclusion the judges of the Nuremberg Trials came to when they declared it a criminal organisation. The post-war West German government came to the same conclusion evidently. \n\nWhy are you being so persistent in trying to defend the organisation?", "55" ], [ "It's enough that I noticed it, and one is too many - on principle the flair simply shouldn't be available. 4 days is also a weird timescale to measure on, and the activity on this sub is not that great so you're unlikely to get a decent enough sample size to get an accurate representation. It'd be more interesting to know what percentage of the sub as a whole uses the flair, but whatever that number is... it's too high.\n\nI'm also surprised that so many people are jumping to the defence of keeping a flair for the Waffen SS. The Waffen SS!", "185" ], [ "R5: I requested CS roll back my character because one of the questlines I was on was broken and could not be completed. Specifically, the Taris: Bonus Series (Republic). I had picked up the Taris: Bonus Series but had completed the quest 'Missing Link' before being directed to do so by the Bonus Series, so by the time the Bonus Series directed me there I'd already done it and I couldn't progress any further in the Bonus Series (abandoning and reacquiring the quest did not help). Thus, I requested a roll back and was denied without any other solution being provided. Can they just release this game as single player and give us a save/load feature already?", "538" ], [ "> You have to be joking to think that the people that chose the SS flair is doing it to push out a racist negative agenda to oppress others.\n\nI didn't say that. I said they chose the flair to signal *something* - I'm still not exactly sure what, but I think best case scenario they just mistakenly think the Waffen SS is \"cool\" and worst case scenario they actively sympathise with Nazism.\n\n > I mean, if you don't like something, why be around it then? Why do numerous people need to change to accommodate one person?\n\nBecause they ought to morally. They're either misinformed about the true nature of the Waffen SS or they don't care - either one of those is a problem. They should be properly informed and they should care. If they are properly informed and still don't care then they either don't *get* the gravity of what the Waffen SS did, or they hold fascist/nazi sympathies (or are immature and think the Waffen SS is 'cool') - in any case this sub is no place for that nonsense. They can go to Neo-Nazi websites/forums if they want to take part in that rubbish.", "743" ], [ "The Waffen SS is a criminal organisation inherently linked to the Nazi Party. It was the military wing of the Nazi Party! Having the Waffen SS as your flair is barely one step removed from having a Swastika as your flair. Should we be okay with people emblazoning themselves with a Swastika even if they don't spout racist Nazi ideology in express terms? I think not. We shouldn't be okay with a Waffen SS flair either.", "743" ], [ "Nah, even without the holocaust the war crimes committed by the Axis as against the war crimes committed by the Allies are nowhere near equal. Another reddit user here referred to 3500 rapes committed by US servicemen in Europe during the war period, I actually did look into how many people Wehrmacht soldiers raped (I knew it was a lot more, but I was actually very surprised to learn how much it was).\n\nApparently 'rapes of Soviet women by the Wehrmacht range up to 10,000,000 incidents, with between 750,000 and 1,000,000 children being born as a result.' \n\nYou can read more about it here: _URL_0_\n\nThose are just estimates of course, obviously war is chaotic so most rapes probably were never reported, or were glossed over if they were, or the records were destroyed/lost.", "55" ] ]
326
[ 22117, 12933, 9530, 12660, 18788, 16792, 14133, 11395, 2598, 25094, 8630, 22679, 9769, 15411, 23588, 8221, 1316, 14963, 414, 3088, 5898, 8544, 4681, 18189, 12096, 2223, 6989, 15985, 20383, 23091, 4196, 5920, 11755, 13722, 2092, 4618, 11203, 22187, 8273, 14535, 2344, 25541, 10694, 9440, 686, 10418, 8055, 4543, 8844, 9327, 7926, 16830, 10399, 20141, 23147, 18536, 12153, 4961, 12561, 19293, 8180, 16115, 14452, 1654, 682, 23101, 5394, 14823, 3864, 1248, 19381, 11660, 14911, 2931, 22883, 22034, 6402, 10373, 9228, 23444, 14558, 13100, 10061, 12551, 13322, 16255, 20858, 9443, 12598, 7104, 12410, 7811, 10485, 21840, 14830, 8110, 3478, 2675, 4731, 4430, 8423, 2630, 8447, 5699, 18716, 8208, 5224, 4460, 5322, 16616, 21148, 23883, 4879, 3712, 1781, 11315, 16880, 23318, 11569, 8049, 3719, 15739, 20177, 23171, 3788, 15019, 768, 7864, 14843, 6592, 19551, 22594, 14790, 5399, 11368, 9899, 5443, 16459, 10683, 23991, 11190, 21751, 10580, 20530, 10032, 18260, 11754, 5444, 3617, 24031, 10097, 10034, 7930, 7070, 24243, 20364, 4479, 16307, 6219, 11094, 11506, 19894, 7252, 11659, 581, 4105, 2555, 19707, 7605, 1343, 2400, 5431, 367, 8777, 11749, 21346, 11548, 14906, 13006, 5667, 10610, 449, 16500, 2854, 9482, 18951, 4688, 793, 1221, 18952, 4797, 7916, 8364, 9161, 13936, 3330, 4887, 4483, 16433, 24838, 25455, 6080, 10606, 24748, 21013, 4378, 1183, 1103, 676, 6959, 16329, 19495, 2240, 8118, 13729, 10055, 5610, 18543, 10708, 21834, 18323, 12132, 19850, 1700, 21922, 9256, 17498, 20510, 2942, 8248, 15570, 7662, 10027, 15916, 2251, 13583, 13896, 8543, 16619, 17406, 22801, 8116, 5055, 16138, 20155, 14415, 20147, 21500, 17359, 12225, 11580, 12017, 15313, 11834, 3268, 13196, 999, 6482, 16666, 21832, 17455, 1472, 6420, 22422, 7136, 21835, 11056, 22257, 21328, 15475, 1095, 24169, 2988, 19138, 10506, 4302, 3271, 12361, 4243, 7999, 20076, 3095, 16448, 21213, 8398, 6198, 24008, 17857, 21972, 17604, 1560, 18040, 3117, 1906, 21553, 16429, 32, 1789, 2541, 14279, 10470, 5878, 2545, 21394, 7827, 16376, 2347, 8719, 1660, 6336, 16464, 17058, 18844, 19099, 970, 19649, 16691, 16149, 8052, 16839, 20218, 6500, 13401, 13380, 343, 16496, 21166, 5988, 20676, 25069, 7709, 24201, 21680, 1145, 20983, 22795, 13768, 20467, 22886, 13489, 7236, 560, 19462, 14986, 11337, 7923, 16524, 12797, 11468, 24564, 2563, 9791, 25125, 24681, 17636, 4362, 25468, 15210, 9703, 988, 5724, 8099, 10196, 12212, 855, 6534, 9296, 4464, 12391, 5979, 10815, 10308, 4314, 18887, 11302, 9939, 19058, 582, 11950, 20445, 9435, 1259, 24676, 21626, 15977, 5498, 3757, 21070, 15979, 25274, 6354, 5553, 1924, 24792, 9409, 10094, 11322, 12637, 19667, 22528, 9762, 21648, 11799, 24507, 22714, 16244, 13465, 3334, 3504, 11128, 21760, 642, 18018, 11386, 13186, 22424, 14225, 5054, 7963, 8722, 8516, 25079, 24895, 23164, 23353, 1623, 1648, 22963, 22584, 986, 18384, 63, 4940, 3653, 12984, 4165, 16546, 16328, 2373, 3120, 8674, 14413, 18158, 22522, 6469, 7663, 17974, 19380, 21140, 223, 19178, 15671, 18562, 21090, 10593, 4281, 14938, 1102, 1138, 17236, 20526, 23977, 1452, 13358, 19998, 408, 9344, 16753, 20828, 20063, 11688, 13951, 25442, 15628, 1953, 12981, 24200, 12097, 15909, 639, 23086, 1229, 13017, 18234, 3363, 3629, 14004, 16037, 22049, 1371, 15435, 17818, 8595, 8969, 11460, 18654, 23312, 12650, 8010 ]
reddit_dump_-Captain-
[ [ "I get where you are coming from, but I respectfully disagree.\n\nWhen I'm playing a city building game I do indeed want to build and expand my city. However there needs to be some sort of challenge to keep me interested in it. A building game that let's me build everything straight away is just a free to build sandbox? Not really something I'm looking for in a tycoon type game.", "829" ], [ "> Is your main gameplay planning and building? Yes, good! Is it fast forward and waiting? Yes, bad!\n\nSo which city building game is doing it correctly according to you? You need resources to build something in most games I have played, whatever it's money or building materials. A little bit of waiting in between being able to build certain buildings is entirely reasonable. \n\nAnd next to that, you don't just build and wait until you can build again? No, there are lots of things you are doing in a city builder. If the only thing you can do in a game is place down buildings... yeah, then it's bad. Extremely bad. Though I cannot think of any game that is like that.", "829" ], [ "True. However you must be able to understand that not everyone is happy about this, because it does impact not only the game itself but also the entire gaming industry. Incredible high prices, games build around microtransactions, keeping non players in the back, shallow games with tons of DLC and so on are the standard, because there are people spending tons and tons of money on it.", "387" ], [ "Born and survive in a world like that? Yeah, raiders are stupid. However.... they have been surviving in that world. And you don't do that by charging at some guy in power armor with a little tire iron. That's beyond being dumb. Human have survived since before we knew or had anything, animals know when to flee and when to attack. Dumb or not, they are familiar with violence and they most certainly know they can't beat power armor with a pathetic melee weapon. \n\nThere is no logical gameplay reason for some AI behavior in the game. And that's fine I guess. I would have liked it more if they would recognize when to flee or at least approach some situations a little bit different.", "22" ], [ "It's fucking ridicoulus. To the point that I'm actually mad about it.\n\nI have a god damn PS4 with only 500GB. It's extremely fucking fucked. I don't want their shitty ass mods in the first place, but forcing me to download it while I'm never gonna touch it is beyond cancerous. \n\nYou can stop automatic updates from happening, but I really have no clue how much GB is on my system because of this shit.", "896" ], [ "Just pick a language. Both Java and Python will work; pick the one you are the most familiar with.\n\nNow don't start with your ultimate roguelike game. Start with small projects, maybe take a small part of a roguelike game and make that, try to find an open source roguelike in your language and add to it/fix some bugs etc. \n\nStick with it. It's a long progress before you are able to really create something of your own. It's not something you are gonna learn over the weekends, sadly enough. Get familiar with your language, pick up some books, follow along with tutorials and finish them. Don't limit yourself to one tutorial at the time. If you already have given up multiple times and started over... just don't. If you lose interest in that tutorial for a bit that's fine. Do something else and get back to it in a couple days. And don't just dive into the roguelike only tutorials, otherwise you will always be glued to that and very limited in what you can actually add yourself. Get some game development books for your language.", "491" ], [ "I like to say first that a “brand new direction” doesn't literally mean a “brand new direction”.\n\nQuick Google search let me back to a 2015 new sources also saying that Fallout 4 was gonna tak the game in a new direction. Sure, there have been some changes and it was less focused on the choice and story, but you can't really say they drastically changed the series.", "1021" ], [ "> **Fallout Online**\n\n > Fallout Online was a massively multiplayer online game (MMO) set in the Fallout universe that was being developed by Masthead Studios and was to be published by Interplay, with members of the Interplay team providing creative control and design. [...] Interplay's rights to developing and publishing this game have been the subject of a legal dispute between Bethesda Softworks, the current owner of the Fallout franchise, and Interplay. An out-of-court settlement was reached in January 2012, **in which Bethesda received full rights to the Fallout online game for two million dollars.**\n\n\nI don't think it is gonna be Fallout Online, but that was an interesting bit anyway. It does come from [wikipedia](_URL_0_) though and I'm way to lazy to fact check.", "1021" ], [ "I never really get this to be honest. \n\nDo people think developers put water in the maps because they just got bored and don't want to fill that part of the map up? I mean they literally recreated Boston.. and the water is right where it should be? It's not like they would have filled that part of the map with new buildings and quests. Sure there could be more gameplay besides swimming, but it's also to guide you around it and just to make the world feel more realistic... because, yes, rivers/seas/etc are a thing.", "20" ], [ "Obsidian, however, isn't the only company who would do a Fallout spin-off. Bethesda has a lot more people on board now and NW was made in like 18 months a believe.... so it's not impossible for them to create a spin-off like game. \n\nBut yeah, I do also think it feels abit too early for a new Fallout game. Not sure what else they could be hyping up like this at this point though.", "1021" ], [ "They knew what a stream like this would do to their fanbase. If they kept it up for an hour and then announced a remaster it would be fine, but this is just what they did with the Fallout 4 reveal (minus the countdown..) So yeah, I doubt it's anything but a new game at this point.\n\n > I don’t know how a Fallout Online would work plus having two mmos seems a bit counterintuitive.\n\nWouldn't be the first company with multiple MMO's, but I agree. I think it's safe to say most TES fans are also Fallout fans, right? Not that both games wouldn't have a steady playerbase at the same time, but I'm just not expecting that.", "1021" ], [ "If <PERSON> is indeed gonna stop I totally agree that the show should just make season 9 the finale one and at least try to go out with some dignity left. \n\nHowever I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they continued it. It's gonna lose viewers for sure, but if it's enough to make money I wouldn't be surprised to see it continue.", "116" ], [ "There were actual plans for a Fallout MMO a couple years back and according to wikipedia it was being developed.\n\n > Interplay's rights to developing and publishing this game have been the subject of a legal dispute between Bethesda Softworks, the current owner of the Fallout franchise, and Interplay. An out-of-court settlement was reached in January 2012, **in which Bethesda received full rights to the Fallout online game for two million dollars.**\n\nNot sure whether or not it's true. Didn't do anymore digging. But if it's true it could very well just be securing their IP. They probably don't want another company making a game with their IP without them having a hand in it. \n\nAnd yes, everything that isn't a new game/spinoff (ala New Vegas) is gonna create a huge backlash for sure.", "161" ], [ "They know what a stream like this will do. Especially if you gonna keep it up for a long time and keep mostly silent. They know that. They have done it before with Fallout 4. Everyone on the internet is talking about it. Everyone is hoping for something. It would be an incredibly dumb move by Bethesda to announce a remaster like this (and they never have done that for the Skyrim remaster either). Oh, and the news sources claiming it is something new and such don't help either.", "1021" ], [ "Sounds like we are getting an open world with something to do besides missions. Which is something that I have felt like was lacking in previous Rockstar games. And way more interaction between NPC's, a place of your own and the gang that is most likely a lot more then just a house or garage. Sounds good so far. Hoped for a little bit of gameplay, but it ended up being a very clickbaity title lol.", "14" ], [ "Like the others said, you might have used an item that boosts your stat for a period of them.\n\n > Is there anything i can do to increase my weight limit?\n\nYes! Increasing your Strength stat will add +10 carry weight per point.\n\nThere is also the strong back perk which will add a total of + 50 carry weight when you put at least 2 points into it.\n\nThere is armor that can increase your carry weight and if you upgrade your armor at a workbench you can also add a modification to it that allows for more carrying. \n\nAnd then there is one of my favorite charisma perks: Lone Wanderer, which will give you + 100 carry weight when you travel alone (without a companion, but you can still take Dogmeat).", "991" ], [ "Piss off already.\n\nThis sub has been screaming \"FUCKING CONFIRMED\" every time someone related to gaming farted. \n\nHow about we just wait and stop taking literally everything and spin it in a way that fits your narrative. If it isn't going to be announced at the Game Awards it will be the next event... as it always has been since the leak. Good god.", "342" ], [ "Biggest improve Fallout 4 brought to the table is that every single item matters. We could pick up a lot of things and random loot in previous Bethesda games, but it was just junk more often than not. With Fallout 4 everything is useful. You use it for crafting weapon and armor mods, cooking, chem crafting and settlement building.\n\nIt's seriously amazing. I've never seen another game do this so well. What other game makes you want to do supply runs?! I've yet to find another one.", "1021" ], [ "I definitely want Fallout 5 to be a Bethesda game. Are their games without fault? No, absolutely not. However there isn't another studio that has delivered me the same openworld experience that I have had in so many of the Bethesda titles.\n\nThey definitely need to work on their engine. It doesn't have to be replaced, but I do hope they have a team dedicated to the engine. It needs a bigger overhaul than a couple bandages slapped on top of it for their next release. Seeing the same bugs that already haunted their games a decade ago shouldn't be a thing anymore. \n\nThey have the resources and audience to be more competent, so they should be.", "1021" ], [ "> Would you buy remastered versions of old Fallout games?\n\nNo. I know people absolutely love remasters, but I don't care for them. If I want to play an old game I play an old game. I don't need a fancy new coating on top of it with a lot bigger price tag. \n\n > Do you want Bethesda to stop trying to innovate and just focus on getting FO5 done right?\n\nStop innovating... what? Because Fallout 76 is a multiplayer game? They can innovate quite alright within their singleplayer titles...\n\nAnyway, yes I rather just have them work on their main titles. Fallout 5 is a **long** time away from us. We first have to get Starfield and The Elder Scrolls 6. I want to see them innovating in these titles. I want a great innovative Fallout 5 eventually. I don't need to new service that remasters their old games or add some new content to that (which they basically already are doing in a way with the Creation Club for Skyrim and Fallout 4).", "1021" ], [ "> Obsidian was a small studio forced to start and finish New Vegas in less than two years. \n\nPlanning is also important. Did they not know what they signed up for?\n\nAnd let's not forgot that Obsidian couldn't keep the ball rolling themselves and have since been saved by Microsoft. You can't just make games without the business side of things. Planning, financial obligations etc all play a role in the game development process. \n\nAiming for the stars when given a small timeslot is incompetency in a way as well. When the company I work for takes up a project it goes through our planning department first, who will check if we have the time and resources to complete it.", "7" ], [ "No thanks. \n\nI have a lot of criticism about Bethesda games, but I also have my fair share of criticism for Obsidian games. I'm kinda curious... have you ever played anything from Obsidian besides New Vegas? \n\nBethesda nails the open world experience like no other in my opinion. I've more hours put into Bethesda titles than all the other games I've played combined. \n\n > Obsidian, although I doubt theyll get them, really deserves the rights ro the fallout series. Could make a case for elder scrolls too.\n\nYou are allowed to think that. I think Bethesda deserves it, because without Bethesda this IP would have been dead a long time ago. As for Elder Scrolls... no. I would love to hear your reasoning for that absurdity. \"Obsidian makes better games they should get the Elder Scrolls IP!\" that it? Lol", "161" ], [ "People are free to prefer either title. \n\nNew Vegas has the superior story, dialogue and RPG options. I don't think many people here are going to argue against that, BUT Fallout 4 brought a lot of new and interesting things to the table as well.\n\nPeople can are are allowed to prefer Fallout 4. \n\nYour statement says more about you than about anyone else.", "1021" ], [ "> So in your mind all games are equal and no game is objectively better than another. \n\nDefinitely not. There are mechanical details that are objectively better.\n\nLiking the story and RPG elements in one game over the other just isn't enough to make it objectively better. 4 doesn't run great, but runs objectively better than New Vegas. Graphics are objective better. You might like the art style in one of them better than the other, but that's preference and not a hard fact. Etc. However, everything together the games are still vastly different and both have their ups and downs so neither is objectively better.\n\nAnd yes, there are people that have played both titles and prefer Fallout 4. \n\n\nBut you are too stubborn to accept your opinion is not fact. Why that is I don't know. Ignorance, maybe? Anyway, it doesn't really matter. I don't see you accepting facts anytime soon so this is my end stop. I'm sure you'll understand me one day, I believe in you.\n\nHave a nice one.", "1021" ], [ "So basically ignored all I said, shoehorned in some ridiculous wild claim. Nice strawman. \n\nPlease lets continue the conversation when you are able to provide me with some facts. Googling about the UK education system, guidelines and teacher/student interactions left me empty handed on all the things you claim.\n \n... but wait ...\n\n\n... no, that's not true. What I found actually **contradicts** what you are saying. _URL_0_\n\nIn other words: you are full of it. It's time to stop.", "248" ], [ "Exactly. Building relationships rooted in mutual respect, proper boundaries to a teachers position. \n\nIn what world is commenting on a drawing inappropriate? Kid, you are reaching. Trying to find something to hang on to, too stubborn to accept that yes you are being ridiculous.\n\nYou ignored what I said because you can't actually share any data, facts, court cases or news stories with me. I had to bring something up and even then you try to spin them in your favor - horribly so, but still. \n\nHave fun in your fantasy world in which teachers are students are not allowed to interact. Sounds awful.. luckily it's not the case here. And neither in the UK.", "607" ], [ "Teacher giving a compliment (you know studies have shown that compliments are very great stimula?) does not equal staying after school with the headmaster to do extra 'homework'. \n\nBut the fact the only arguments you keep bringing up are extreme cases says enough. You are too stubborn to admit you were being ridiculous. \n\nImagine going apeshit over something like. I feel sorry for your kids and the teachers they have had if that is how you have been raising them. Though for their sake I'm hoping you are just a stubborn ass that wants to be right online, even when he is clearly wrong.", "607" ], [ "You an incel or something like that? Is that the problem here. You got some weird idea of how all woman should be held to different standards when you deem them attractive? \n\nWhy does her gender or looks matter anyways? It's a teacher leaving a nice comment. Jesus. You know nothing about her or her professor.\n\nAlso... please answer:\n\n > If a nice comment on a drawing is beyond inappropriate I'd love to know what you consider thoughtful and caring.\n\n > Teachers being blindfolded in the classroom so they can't look at their students? Is that thoughtful and kind to you? Lmao", "378" ], [ "I absolutely love this video tho. \n\nPerfect example of why the Fallout 4 combat is so much fun. Getting some VATS hits, the Mystery Man pops up, followed by a cinematic killshot, grenade flying over your head and exploding behind you in a big yellowish flash, killing an enemy, sending his weapon flying, throwing a quick bash while the rag doll physics doing their thing. And well, a bug to completely the classic Bethesda experience. \n\nRight lol, I love this game so much.", "14" ], [ "Really? I do not agree with that at all.\n\nThey have always been about creating big open world sandboxes to me and I personally feel that's been never been better than it was in Fallout 4 (haven't played 76).\n\nIf anything that's what they've been focusing on more than anything else. You just do your own thing in this big sandbox. In terms of quest design, choice and consequence they really haven't dialed back imo. It never was their strong suit if you ask me.", "1021" ], [ "The original Minecraft (Java) yes. But Microsoft didn't just buy Minecraft. They made their own version, basically the same but cross play between consoles, pc and phones. They brought that and even more versions to quite some platforms (Playstation, ps vita, switch, wii, nintendo). Same for the Minecraft spinoffs they made, they were not exclusives.\n\nNot saying that it will be the same for Bethesda's games. I personally don't see it happening tho. I think Bethesda will become Microsoft exclusive (at least the big titles from BGS), but only time will tell.", "161" ], [ "They never expected the game to get so much attention. Because of that they have increased team sizes, scope and level of polish. They've also since been bought by Riot Games.\n\nThey've done plenty of blog posts on their site. Honestly it's looking great. Ive been playing Minecraft for nearly a decade now and truly hope this will be able to replace that game for me.", "14" ], [ "God, those last couple seconds are truly heart wrenching. I think I'd break down right beside her. The squeaky thank you's at the end, my god poor girl went through hell. Thank god someone was able to spot something wasn't right... seemed like he would have gotten away with it fairly easy if it wasn't for this woman.\n\nLooks like the police knows who the pig is, hopefully they'll find him sooner than later.", "481" ], [ "Euh, we don't even need to show examples of other games running properly.\n\nEven if nothing else was there to compare it to, CDPR still sold the game for 70 bucks on these consoles. They still hid the way it performed on the consoles from consumers. \n\n\nAnd this is also why I love the Witcher 3 and not CDPR. Throughout the years I've seen plenty amazing companies take a bad turn or developers I never really enjoyed release something I loved. Etc.\n\nCyberpunk 2077 probably still will end up being a great experience with the next gen patch and updates down the road, but that does not excuse what they did with the base consoles. It's simply disgusting.", "995" ], [ "Here you see how great PR gets you pretty far. CDPR has some of the best PR, always playing in on customers and situations. Coming out with some (empty) comment when something happens in the industry, <PERSON>.\n\nPeople eat all their shit up after 1 great game. And they still bend backwards to defend them over a broken product on the base consoles.\n\nIt's not okay. You don't need to defend a multi billion company.", "995" ], [ "Correct me of I'm wrong, but I can't remember them changing multiple big features in TW3 as part of patches and bug fixes? Wasn't it mainly just fixing bugs and improving performance?\n\nYou are reacting to a chain of comments complaining about bad AI/worst police system ever in an open world game. And that's not the only repeating complaint.\n\nThere is a difference between squashing bugs and completely revamping entire features.", "586" ], [ "The next gen consoles aren't free last time I checked. Some people have no intention of buying a next gen anytime soon. You pay 70 bucks for a current gen experience then you can expect to get it. If you sell something on current gen it should work on current gen, simple as that. No matter what other versions you give away with it.\n\nMy problem isn't with the graphics - although literally blocky polygon people is a joke. It's that the game simply does not function on the base consoles.\n\nIf you cannot see the issue here then you either are choosing to give them a pass or you aren't aware of the shit show it is on the consoles at the moment.", "933" ], [ "I disagree.\n\nPeople have begged many developers for various games throughout the years, death threats and everything sadly are very common. Some of those games have still not been announced or released... If they even are in development.\n\nYou really think some mad threads on Reddit and some string of angry Tweets is going to push a multi billion company over the edge? You know they put their devs through pretty shit crunches, right? They don't care about a death threat from <PERSON> the angry 16 year old.\n\nAnyways, I find it almost sad to see some people put the blame on the fans when one of the biggest game studios in Europe decided to sell a non functioning product on the base consoles for 70 bucks. Also not something I've seen a lot before with other bad launches.", "161" ], [ "And yet CDPR sold it for 70 bucks, took all leaked base console footage down (even though PC streams were up and not taken down at the exact same time) and they did not send out console review copies.\n\nThey knew what a shit show it was and tried to hide it before launch to make that sweet sweet money.. and you are defending them. No wonder these companies keep doing the same shit, you are literally putting the blame on fans while defending shitty practices. Yikes.", "995" ], [ "> What am I missing? This game doesn't seem very sandbox-y at all which is disappointing.\n\nLook at The Witcher 3. Right now Cyberpunk is a bit of a hot mess, I hope they can solve that. I'm sure the game will be great eventually on PC and next gen. Not sure how much they can do for the PS4 and X one though?\n\nBut yeah.. TW3 is an amazing game for it's quests and dialogue. Yes, it had a beautiful world... No it wasn't a big sandbox to go fuck all in and do your own thing. I'm gonna guess that Cyberpunk 2077 is basically the same format. It will shine during the missions.\n\nNot to make this a comparison post, but Bethesda is still at the top when it comes down to the whole big open world sandbox feel. I've looked everywhere, but have yet to find another developer coming close to that (for me at least).", "369" ], [ "Bethesda is still at the top when it comes down to the open world RPG sandbox experience.\n\nNo one has come close as far as I know.. and I've looked around everywhere. Outer Worlds had a lot of hype around it, but it quieted down rather quickly after launch. People wanted to see a \"Bethesda killer\", especially at that time. The game wasn't bad, but it was not what people secretly want: a fucking Bethesda game.\n\nIt's also why I have not been worried about Starfield and TES6 at all. Yeah, the loading and engine showed it's age with Fallout 4, yeah I didn't care for 76.. but they've never let me down with their singleplayer experiences for 2 decades now.. and I don't they will with Starfield either.\n\nThey just got a very solid foundation for games that people just love and play for hundreds and sometimes thousands of hours. Also one of the biggest reasons they will stick with the Creation Engine. It's their golden goose.", "1021" ], [ "Thats fine, but remember that this goes for every big developer that releases anything in the next couple years. All studios around the world had to make compromises and changes. Some more then others, but still don't just forget about it a year from now. Games are in development for years.\n\nAt the end of the day, the thing that bugs me the most is not the bugs. It's that they knew it was a shit show on base consoles and made sure it wasn't known before launch day.", "7" ], [ "I currently am sitting at 3 charisma and am starting to expand Sanctuary (with settlers) and am slowly building up Starlight Drive-in (without any settlers). I'm gonna move all settlers to Starlight once I have that one setup with enough rooms and farms. After that I let new settlers come to Sanctuary and when I have enough I will higher my charisma through clothing and booze and then send those guys to Starlight too. That way you get more settlers then your own charisma would allow.\n\nThat said, I will at get the charisma bobblehead and put 2 points into it myself soon, because I need those 2 perks.", "174" ], [ "They will get their turn. I mean, I am both a big Elder Scrolls and Fallout fan, but I don't feel entitled to get a game from either franchise. Bethesda will put one out when they are ready. The Elder Scrolls will come out, have some patience. \n\nIn a couple years when The Elder Scrolls 6 comes out (I assume it's not gonna be announced anytime soon) there will be people here that are salty it's not Fallout 5. They are allowed to make their games in their order and at their pace.\n\nI get people want to have something new from the franchise in their hands, but honestly the entitled behavior is getting so old.", "422" ], [ "I'm not 100% sure either, but this is what they say on that channel:\n\n > TheConquerorPanda Hi,I checked with <PERSON> just a little while ago and he says yes and a big thank you to everyone,he’s thrilled about this,I’m the administrator for this YouTube channel that covers all of <PERSON>’s music and I admin his Facebook group as well,he issued a message on his Facebook page that said “all I can say is thank you,wow”", "371" ], [ "No, I don't want that. Neither did I said anything about how I feel about Fallout 4 besides the facts that I was happy with the setting and the lore.\n\nMy point was that it is all subjective. Maybe I should have been more clear. There are people who absolutely love Fallout 4, people that hate it and everything in between. \n\nI think it's way to simple to say \"Fallout is this\" when the Fallout franchise had already seen many changes and some pretty different spinoff titles.", "1021" ], [ "Fair enough, but It's been done... in fact this happens with almost every announcement . The \"I'll do this if it turns out to be this\" isn't something new. \n\nI don't know if that is worth being put in the game. I thought it was kinda lovely of Bethesda that they turned the brother of Fallout fan into Fallout 4 (who had died). Personally I think if they suddenly started to put things like this into it that it would take away their nice gesture towards <PERSON> and <PERSON>. That should remain something special.", "1021" ], [ "Melee is so fucking fun! I wasn't entirely sure about it when I started a couple days ago, but man I'm hooked as hell. I started with 9 in strength and agility and had barely any health, so I got easily killed in the beginning. But after you upgraded some perks you begin to one hit so many enemies. \n\nAnd when you really can't get through a quest, I just take Power Armor and drugs. Couldn't for the love of god get through the Forged gang, but with PA and drugs you go through them like they are butter.", "190" ], [ "That is what I was expecting with a show called FEAR the Walking Dead. I mean, <PERSON> literally told us that they are the Walking Dead. So, I always wanted this already. And everyone who has seen season 3 should have known this was gonna happen, it was very clearly going that direction.\n\nIt's a shame they had to drag Fear into shit as well, right when it started to become absolutely amazing. Fears season 3 was the best season from both Walking Dead shows for me. It really brought something new to the table.", "60" ], [ "I just started a new character a couple days ago. Kinda was done with the pistol build I seem to use in every Fallout game. I made a melee build, which is something I never did in a Fallout game and I gotta say combined with the right perks and VATS It's absolutely amazing.\n\nI suggest playing on survival, if you feel like you are pretty good at the game. It can be pretty brutal, especially early on. But it's so much worth it. I'm taking it pretty slow, sitting at level 27 right now and the only main quest I have done is \"Out of Time\" (which is the second). I'm slowly building up some settlements and working through some Minuteman quests. \n\nAnd when taking it slowly. Starting around Sanctuary, clearing locations around it out etc you'll find a lot more fun encounters and quests you wouldn't have come across if you just stuck to the quest markers. \n\nI suggest planning your build out. You can kinda throw your SPECIAL together and spend perk points randomly if you want, but it's much more fun if you know where you wanna go with your character.", "283" ], [ "You are going way to big. Get a settlement with 2 people and it's much easier. One settler is farming and the other should be a high level shop. Enough protection, water, food and beds and you should be fine. Cats, dogs and gorillas can increase the happiness too!\n\nThe wiki states it's best to stay around in the settlement with the workshop menu open.", "173" ], [ "I love survival. BECAUSE of the no saving you become more aware of everything around you. Dying because of bugs is fucked up, but there are so many beds and so many settlement locations that you can save pretty often. \n\nThey should have had some vanilla toggles, to turn certain things off. But to be honest it's pretty doable and survival should be hard and at times frustrating; it's what makes the game fun for (and will keep it fun for a long time).", "14" ], [ "Yes. When you reach level 30 you unlock the Nuka World radio station. For Far Harbor you need to do the 'Getting a clue' quest (in which you get <PERSON> as companion). If you have done that you'll also start a new quest that requires you to listen to a radio station (\"<PERSON> detective agency Radio\").\n\n\nto have met <PERSON>, if you have you will also get a radio notification for the <PERSON> detective agency.", "174" ], [ "I don't think the series is gonna be finished. I would already be surprised if we get Winds of Winter. \n\nThat's why I hope he has his stories and characters very well detailed and written down somewhere, so that they can make something like Pottermore for A Song of Ice and Fire. That way we can still read about the ending and what happens to certain characters. It wouldn't be the best, but with so many locations, characters, double meanings, foreshadowing etc I doubt any writer is gonna do the series justice.", "116" ], [ "Everyone who doesn't realize must be incredibly dumb and naive. Fallout 4 was and still is a huge success. Both financially and how the game is received by many players. \n\nIt was popular to hate on Fallout 4 on this sub for a long time, that's why I left it for a while because in every thread you saw people bashing Fallout 4. Or when there was a thread about New Vegas some folks had to come in and say something about how much better it was. It has cooled down a lot since. And I think Fallout 4 has found its place. Some people still don't like it and that is totally fair. It didn't have what a lot of us loved about the franchise, but it's still a great game. I've been playing it a lot more then any other Fallout title in the last couple years and I didn't touch it for a long time after rushing the the main quests when it came out.", "1021" ], [ "I just went through a lot of quests with him to max his affinity and actually liked him too. His chats whenever you reach a milestone are pretty neat and he seems like a honest caring person.\n\nHowever, if you do his quests he removes every change to roleplay as anything else as the good guy. He constantly praises you and thanks you for turning the Commonwealth around.", "283" ], [ "> I had to retract my foreskin first myself then he told me to go lay down and he retracted it. He managed to retract it further than me. It hurted a bit. \n\nMy doctor never did this, but I have heard this before. Did he force is down harder then you personally would have done? \n\nAs for the cream... no clue. How far can you retract? If your foreskin is already getting close to fully being fixed he might think you don't need cream, because you are already near the end? Otherwise no clue.", "893" ], [ "> Should I basically just keep retracting when erect? -\n\nFor as long as you can't confortable move your foreskin up and down, erect and flaccid, you keep stretching. You don't have to stretch when erect. I believe it's advices to do it when flaccid. \n\n > Also, should I retract and then put a condom on if having sex?\n\nYes. However make sure you don't get the foreskin stuck behind the glans, if you ever do go to the doctor immediately if you can't get it back up. \n\n\n > Is this unexpected?\n\nYour head has been hidden and protected by your foreskin for a long time. It will get less sensitive over time. Keep exposing it basically.", "581" ] ]
337
[ 6206, 14816, 20943, 10833, 19019, 21239, 19180, 7523, 1981, 16365, 20818, 12467, 1968, 11400, 2296, 5913, 14021, 14011, 12562, 6669, 13724, 412, 24191, 5006, 10551, 2404, 4171, 16812, 19926, 20953, 2738, 19255, 25376, 20024, 14682, 6092, 147, 12258, 13559, 12028, 4020, 15655, 14651, 1941, 3484, 19050, 23562, 12817, 14131, 19437, 12190, 14805, 7184, 3122, 372, 19693, 7222, 16385, 9982, 9547, 25266, 22373, 8593, 13255, 13287, 3114, 18484, 10705, 20095, 14614, 21815, 4489, 3515, 3638, 18155, 15712, 11906, 4076, 5948, 10848, 4120, 1821, 25192, 7599, 21143, 4674, 5325, 2113, 13791, 1636, 19421, 13228, 2051, 2, 5553, 10165, 14542, 22730, 5785, 25329, 13640, 10646, 12404, 4872, 18008, 2998, 13532, 4894, 7221, 5552, 16677, 25284, 20070, 5841, 1891, 5093, 6865, 16333, 5094, 17097, 2260, 9775, 20821, 13359, 19359, 8916, 7710, 7884, 18832, 21104, 2117, 13237, 1824, 11908, 12426, 24577, 9042, 7632, 13526, 6891, 12381, 5908, 11035, 18717, 8151, 11262, 5721, 23029, 16950, 7925, 21434, 16852, 14089, 25261, 14164, 18459, 1667, 12886, 25494, 22868, 20295, 24358, 8884, 9132, 25136, 418, 22820, 20882, 20284, 3622, 6984, 915, 830, 13422, 7246, 9748, 24109, 19400, 8114, 11844, 17488, 24481, 10939, 11288, 13528, 4984, 21499, 18631, 9920, 9539, 5058, 1370, 4437, 22799, 3316, 18461, 6529, 16309, 5417, 19576, 18291, 8757, 13418, 16648, 12369, 14250, 10288, 20133, 5891, 19942, 3216, 10106, 20443, 20098, 763, 11762, 21798, 11005, 7793, 2932, 1059, 1207, 5108, 8473, 4882, 19891, 23199, 10480, 7995, 1295, 19834, 9712, 11215, 3389, 22619, 23774, 16906, 7829, 1672, 501, 14348, 16233, 8367, 20278, 6574, 11134, 9664, 12646, 18414, 24332, 5194, 9777, 17261, 17281, 10313, 7253, 12300, 21337, 14477, 14756, 19602, 3857, 13911, 10074, 23353, 19643, 10123, 5105, 10967, 4174, 19132, 23227, 12719, 12575, 8896, 308, 12810, 9348, 19679, 1726, 6045, 4310, 4133, 6662, 6832, 1407, 21248, 9967, 2577, 4851, 2884, 13838, 19906, 21325, 13457, 6182, 22953, 23833, 5986, 16697, 8995, 7830, 25071, 23106, 24144, 10178, 2045, 8245, 1425, 9454, 17784, 7755, 11289, 5831, 15646, 11705, 10798, 5293, 14732, 24965, 2486, 10612, 4069, 4637, 3928, 20963, 9009, 15959, 22041, 16608, 3303, 18090, 14535, 15470, 8205, 7876, 1360, 15849, 2937, 13065, 18263, 16143, 17643, 11594, 25328, 17536, 9813, 883, 22389, 1711, 8628, 2573, 1371, 2642, 18217, 3460, 20291, 7005, 6258, 7769, 18140, 5336, 3833, 12395, 1773, 10999, 10047, 8599, 12231, 4142, 6718, 5112, 15507, 7750, 20134, 8038, 48, 5427, 11561, 18169, 5777, 4311, 22330, 4971, 6648, 4226, 4550, 25166, 22225, 7074, 9026, 7075, 2216, 17035, 17501, 12885, 1411, 7353, 13110, 9156, 14691, 7240, 5031, 14344, 345, 2055, 15399, 12017, 25433, 2457, 6245, 12531, 4214, 7298, 1191, 8749, 10213, 5309, 13279, 21175, 10970, 21930, 25132, 6507, 11760, 931, 2039, 21647, 13004, 4655, 12931, 2976, 1582, 15687, 22840, 2634, 342, 14518, 7530, 5537, 397, 18910, 18262, 2628, 20942, 9361, 10905, 23159, 3080, 14162, 10576, 2105, 14882, 22367, 12470, 5038, 6328, 6275, 9740, 16293, 5425, 9938, 13482, 4418, 16212, 9373, 10515, 24288, 25351, 20001, 7807, 614, 17178, 1641, 11188, 6894, 19616, 20927, 25333, 23525, 5874, 13736, 12842, 9925, 21549, 1342, 15371, 7657, 7016, 4806, 4656, 6047, 1829, 15243, 14046, 7280, 21088, 23414, 7257 ]
reddit_dump_-Cheule-
[ [ "Just received my second hub, and I moved 20 lights over to the new hub so that only 42 are on the old hub. Everything is much more responsive! I always thought the lagging bulbs were zigbee interference. I never thought it was an overloaded hub.\n\nI also found a really good article on how the hubs have a theoretical limit of 125 devices (63 light and 62 accessories), but that the slow down usually occurs at 50 lights and 12 accessories: _URL_0_", "333" ], [ "In Home app, go to the little Home icon upper left, then settings. Then click Hubs and Bridges. You can then disable the HomePod mini as a hub.\n\nI have 4 AppleTVs and 5 HomePods. I have 1 AppleTV disabled because it’s a 4th gen (not 4K) and the processor is slower.\n\nEdit: I’m right that the hubs are listed there, but for some reason I cannot enable the old AppleTV or disable the newer 4Ks... perhaps something changed? Or maybe I turned it off elsewhere? I’ll edit my post if I figure it out.\n\nEdit edit: oh! I remember now. I did it on the AppleTV itself under settings \"Airplay and Homekit.\" I guess that’s why your are having problems doing it on the HomePod! I don't see a way either.", "756" ], [ "All I can say is, it adds up quicker than you think. I have a pretty standard 2000 sq ft home. 3 bedroom 2 bath. But think about it, just one bathroom has two vanities of 3 lightbulbs each, and then a ceiling dome light of two bulbs. So 8 bulbs one bathroom. \n\nMy kitchen has recessed light fixtures, so we have 8 lightbulbs over the kitchen island alone. It just adds up. \n\nBut aside from 62 light bulbs, I also have an EcoBee 3 thermostat, Insignia Garage Door opener, 5 HomePods, 4 AppleTVs, half dozen smart wall plugs for things like shop lights and patio string lights, and a Schlage Sense smart door lock. oh, I just remembered I also have 5 Logitech circle HSV cameras that appear in the Home app.", "333" ], [ "We use the HomePods for music and Siri access. We have a HomePod in the family room, living room and home office, as well as a stereo pair in the master bedroom for TV watching. \n\nEven my 6 year old walks around the house saying things like “hey <PERSON> good morning” to turn on the hallway and kitchen lights, or “hey <PERSON> turn on the TV” to turn our home receiver on (via a smart plug) and the LG TV via a AppleTV wake command. I accomplish that last command via a Siri Shortcut.", "756" ], [ "In my OP I mention that I had accidentally deleted 5 rooms while pruning scenes in the philips hue app. When setting up complicated automations or using third party apps it easy to make mistakes you regret in HomeKit. My question is without a backup/restore in Controller, how would I go about restoring lost info from iCloud from a mistaken delete? I haven’t found a way.", "171" ], [ "...and since iCloud backups tend to be automatic, what if I didn’t catch my HomeKit mistake in time? The beauty of using Controller is you can make as many versioned backups as you want, by name and date. Then view the backup configurations before restoring. It really is very fine grain control. For the HomeKit-hardcore user.", "570" ], [ "Sound quality is *awesome* for a small form factor bookshelf speaker. I’ve had a few small form factor speakers like Jawbone Jamboxes/Bose/Amazon echo, and the HomePod is the best of them all. \n\nWith that said, it doesn’t hold a candle to my Yamaha receiver and Martin Logan electrostats, so it’s all relative. \n\nI will say this though, the stereo pairing helps more than I thought it would.", "563" ], [ "For me, bulbs is the better way because 1) I’ve moved a few times in the last 5 years and it’s far easier to pull bulbs than switches, 2) I often do things like turn on a single vanity light to 5% for a nightlight, and 3) I use the color changing for temperature. I usually have it set very warm via “hey <PERSON> set light to topaz”. I find “hey <PERSON> set light to white” looks like shit. My second favorite hue is “Navajo white.”", "333" ], [ "It’s not auto off, it’s something like “allow HDMI sleep” or something similar. It’s instant. If I long press the AppleTV “tv” button, and then select sleep from the side menu, both the AppleTV and LG OLED sleep simultaneously. \n\nWe only have AppleTVs, no cable boxes. We use Plex with a massive home media server, and then apps like HBO go, and Disney+.", "756" ], [ "I’m a lifetime Plex pass. I don’t think I noticed the tone mapping. I’ll check it out. I don’t think I’ve ever tried to use subs and HDR at the same time. I use subs sometimes, but it’s generally on 1080p SDR. Out of the 1300 movies I have, I’d say I only have 30-40 4K 10-bit movies, and wouldn’t ruin the experience with subs :). Subs are great at night when you don’t want the music loud, but if I’m watching a 4K epic movie, I’m cranking the 5.1!", "375" ], [ "Super simple. As some folks have pointed out in other posts, Controller isn’t able to do an exact restore so a few things like automations might be restored, but without the devices assigned. But trust me, it beats the hell out of having to remember what you named things and having to search for HomeKit ID labels to scan. \n\nAnother thing though, a lot of time when I use the restore function it’s because I’ve removed a device or room. When you restore, it does a merge. Meaning if my automations already work, it’s not going to undo that. So like last night when I restored, everything was back to normal. All my devices/rooms/scenes/automations and shortcuts were perfect. The only side effect was this: all the devices and room I had just restored ended up appearing in favorites again. So I had to spent a few minutes reconfiguring favorites. \n\nBut again, that was trivial to do. If I had had to do it by hand.... smh.", "707" ], [ "I have HOOBS as stated in my OP, I’ll look into that plug-in. This subreddit has revealed a lot of things I wouldn’t have otherwise thought of. For example, I just heard about and created an automation that turns all my HomePods down to 5% volume every night so that when I start issuing commands Siri doesn’t shout and wake the family.", "672" ], [ "I didn’t clear out anything in Home. I just opened Controller and restored. All my backups are always to iCloud (rather than local) because I’d be worried if I lost my phone I’d lose my backups. \n\nI just upgraded to an iPhone 12, and because I use iCloud as a save point, all my backups were there for about 3 years.\n\nI think the *only* reason Controller defaults to “local saving” over iCloud is for privacy and security concerns.", "697" ], [ "Yeah, my last edit points out that I had thought you could, but probably can’t. What I actually did was disable an AppleTV 4. I did it through the Apple TV interface, and it shows as “disabled” in the area of the Home app I described. However since there is no on screen interface for HomePods, there isn’t a way to do it that I can see.\n\nWhat I finally did was I unplugged the HomePods I didn’t want to be the hub. Let the ones I did want to serve as hub take over, then powered the other back up. \n\nObviously this might not “stick,” but it’s working for now.", "756" ], [ "Oh man, I’ve been there! I once had to reset my hue hub and I lost about 50 devices that time. Took me two days of setup to get it back. Having been through the experience already, when someone else talked about Controller for HomeKit, it was an instant-buy for me. \n\nI see a couple people in this thread saying things like “why would you need to backup, I’ve never needed that” and all I can say is, they’ve not been homekitting long or hard enough. They’ll understand one day.", "493" ], [ "For that, I use an app called HomePass. It allows you to scan and store all the codes in a database. Then later you can display the HomeKit \"label\" on your watch, phone or mac screen. Then you can scan the image on screen.\n\nObviously this won't allow you to go back in time... but it might help for future devices.", "697" ], [ "I haven’t done a lot of testing, but the main hub is usually a HomePod over an AppleTV. If I unplug all the HomePods, the first one I plug in usually connects and stays connected. \n\nTo be honest I haven’t given it a lot of long term testing because my HomeKit has been snappy.", "756" ], [ "It’s really funny! And as a video teacher, the only thing I would object to would be the jump cuts. Jump cuts are something that YTers do all the time that usually isn’t done in the real business. They basically show 1) it wasn’t storyboarded or 2) there wasn’t enough coverage to make edits properly.\n\nEdit: I’m realizing a lot of replies are indicating confusion over what I meant about “jump cut.” Jump cuts to remove time are used all the time in feature films. I was indicating editing from one camera setup to the same camera setup is generally considered “bad.” [This piece](_URL_0_) is full of jump cuts as well, but notice they are all to different camera setups. That's the difference between having enough coverage, and YT editing in general. Thanks to u/louieanderson for the clip.", "123" ], [ "YouTube is definitely more watched than traditional media at this point, but the money isn’t the same for sure. Projects for film and TV have much more money attached to them.\n\nThis might change at some point, but currently almost anyone working for a major feature film or TV show (like even crafts service) is making a salary you can support a family on. Whereas only a few on YT are making real money—the vast majority are making peanuts. \n\nIt could be argued that [Alphabet](_URL_0_) as a company is taking all the profits and leaving so little for the actual creatives, but it could also be that there just wasn’t much money being generated by the online ads in the first place.", "999" ], [ "100% agree with you, there are so many factors that it really is “whatever works.”\n\nHaving printed a fair amount of ABS, warp is usually the result of the delta between bed temp and nozzle temp. So higher bed and lower nozzle is one of the things that really helps stop my ABS warping. (I run my bed at 110°, and my nozzle at a relatively cool 230°)\n\nIn truth I don’t get PLA warp, but having printed so much ABS, I’ll also mention a couple other tips:\n\n- low ambient temps can cause it\n- air drafts\n- too much cooling, reduce fan speeds or even turn it off\n- increase layer time so that the next layer doesn’t go on until the last one has had time to slowly cool. Search “layer time” in Cura and set it from 10 sec to 30s+", "583" ], [ "If you mean to say that specific YT channels like Good Mythical Morning could make more money for the talent than the same talent might make on a lesser known indie film, I totally agree. I just meant to say the mean value of money attached to projects in mainstream TV and Film is more than the mean value for even well known YT channels.\n\nNotice I say “talent” because Alphabet still takes the lion’s share of the money generated from a given project, whereas the production company for a film might take a more reasonable cut today. I say “today” because if you look at the golden age of Hollywood, talent and directors made peanuts and the studio took it all—similar to what Alphabet is doing now. It took 80 years of contract negotiations to get to where the status quo is today for the film industry.", "321" ], [ "He’s very funny, and his instincts on what will make the audience laugh is as good as any top working comic or sitcom personality. But having jump cuts isn’t a comedy thing, it’s a directorial thing.\n\nEdit: apparently I wasn’t clear. The comedy is gold. The direction is not. There isn’t enough coverage. They could totally make it in feature movies as comedy writers or perhaps talent. But from what I’ve seen they got a long way to go before they’d be selected as a hired gun director by a studio project.", "936" ], [ "That’s really funny. Thanks for sharing. \n\nI think some of the argument around the term “jump cut” is centered around the fact that there are several definitions for it. \n\nIf you term “jump cut”’to mean “an advance in time” which is used often in professional filmmaking, just that clip is full of them. \n\nI was more pointing out the other definition that applies, which is generally a no-no, and that is when you edit from one camera setup to the same camera setup. This also produces a jump in time, but it’s considered an editing or directorial faux pas. Notice in the above piece all the edits are different camera setups.\n\nAnd please tell me you aren’t “the” L.A.?", "560" ], [ "I think some of the argument around the term “jump cut” is centered around the fact that there are several definitions for it. \n\nIf you term “jump cut”’to mean “an advance in time” which is used often in professional filmmaking, it is definitely used all the time professionally. \n\nI was more pointing out the other definition that applies, which is generally a no-no, and that is when you edit from one camera setup to the same camera setup. This also produces a jump in time, but it’s considered an editing or directorial faux pas.\n\nAnd of course even rules like the 180° rule are broken by venerable directors like <PERSON> in the shining for effect, so yes, even editing to the same camera setup happens in film. However, in YT we see it all the time, not in order to convey discombobulation or to put the audience on edge, but because it was a one camera setup, nothing was scripted, and the editor had no other shot to edit to but the main shot.", "560" ], [ "You’re right of course, no one wants to see a lot of fumbling around or unnecessary pauses in a monologue. I think my point is that these “unnecessary jump cuts” mostly stem from:\n\n1) not having the script memorized (or no script at all)\n\n2) not having enough camera setups to properly mask the jump cut (coverage)\n\n3) no insert shots\n\nReally we are saying the same thing, which is content on YouTube has less craft. I guess I’m just worried that, like the pig farmer that no longer smells the pig shit, the jump cut desensitized YT audience will become the content producers for feature films and network TV. Then, unnecessary jump cuts will not only be used more, but a “style choice.” In fact—that already might be the case. \n\nI guess I’m too old 😢. /end old guy rant.", "999" ], [ "I agree, and it’s fine for YT in general. It also shows a lack of scripting/memorizing lines/doing enough takes—which again is OK for YT. \n\nRemember this was supposedly a “film class final project.” As the video production professor, I think the lack of craft in this final project wouldn’t earn it an A. Especially if it was pitted against straight pieces that showed better direction or production or technical knowledge. \n\nI realize that the video is masquerading as “new guy doesn’t know what he’s doing,” so all these mistakes are “intentional.” But again, as the professor, I think I’d feel like “great, you’ve shown me you understand how to *not do titles*, but does that really show me you understand what I’ve been trying to teach you during this course?”\n\nLastly, the premise of this project is that it’s a live unedited piece—they are in a Live TV studio with a technical director and switcher (they reference it). So the jump cuts in time don’t even work for the premise.\n\nI’m not trying to trash the piece, I found it funny. But as a video instructor who tries to teach the “rules of filmmaking” to students, this is the kind of project I’ll get from a student that doesn’t want to take the time to do it right. And... if this is for a intro class or film project for non-film majors, I’d give this a high grade. It’s just not something I’d want to see from a seasoned film student.", "123" ], [ "Au contraire! <PERSON> is like a jazz player who knows his scales so well he destroys scale progression in his solo. This is a student project, and doesn’t show he learned his scales in the first place.\n\nI guess I’m just coming at this from the perspective of someone that sees hundreds of students every year who hand me projects filled with jump cuts because they didn’t script or storyboard anything. Then they attempt to call the jump cuts “style,” when it’s just an obviously rushed project.", "635" ], [ "Best of luck, hopefully someone knows (I don’t). But I had to post because the idiotic light patterns that are supposed to tell you what is going on are big part of why I dumped my Drobos.\n\nEven the dashboard (which you often cannot connect to if shit has hit the fan) doesn’t really tell you what’s going on.\n\nI really hope someone can guide you, I don’t wish data failure on anyone.\n\nP.s. the blue lights at the bottom look like the unit isn’t booted fully?", "653" ], [ "Funny thing is, it’s pretty easy to mask it too. All he needs to do is shoot that medium shot straight on, and have a second camera on a CU, and then a third camera on a loose medium to WS. \n\nThen in any respectable editing software (Resolve, Premiere, FCP), he can easily do a multi cam edit by watching the raw footage and “switching” in real-time between the cameras with the 1, 2 and 3 keys on the keyboard. All the “ums” and “ahs” can be edited out, and then you just fall back to another camera angle to mask the jump in body position. \n\nSometimes it’s a little more complicated than that (waiting for similar arm position etc), but it’s not tremendously difficult. I just wish YTers would hold themselves to higher standards. And of course, some do. You won’t find jump cuts in GMM for example.", "44" ], [ "Yes. And that’s mainly because they use traditional, non-proprietary RAID striping. Of course BeyondRAID (Drobo’s proprietary format) allows differing drive sizes, but it also is what makes them such a pain too.\n\nIf I take my 6 bay RAID (all with 6TB drives) and throw them inside 6 separate usb docks, they’ll mount without my RAID enclosure and work fine. Also in part because I use software RAID, and the driver is written into the boot partition of the HDs themselves.\n\nWhile hardware RAID solutions will need a hardware RAID enclosure to boot, there isn’t anything g proprietary about their RAID format or striping, so if the enclosure controller or PSU dies, you can just pop them into another enclosure.\n\nIn my case, the 6 bay RAID has all 6TB drives from different manufacturers, and it’s fine.", "448" ], [ "I use OWC ThunderBay RAID enclosures now. Absolutely love them. They come with SoftRAID which is for Mac. It’s a joy to use, gives me immense control and data on what’s going on. Super fast too. The RAIDs take about 15 seconds to come online from off, and give me up to 400 Mbps speed with slow 5400 drives.\n\nThe ThunderBays are all metal, top quality. I’m telling you, when I see pictures of plasticky Drobos now, I go “ewww.”", "448" ] ]
408
[ 22463, 10421, 13345, 25233, 1271, 23175, 8294, 14289, 17695, 17286, 10448, 15806, 16168, 20242, 16092, 2547, 15440, 9892, 189, 2429, 12596, 2889, 17152, 24425, 10525, 4335, 11217, 4650, 2581, 2059, 17934, 20876, 13090, 9756, 15399, 12385, 21011, 5570, 7654, 15857, 19709, 21802, 9931, 625, 1936, 24800, 12980, 12722, 6409, 3093, 12972, 165, 19795, 10532, 6883, 9413, 14278, 24304, 6786, 24455, 23971, 16686, 12763, 19580, 13916, 23010, 5163, 2307, 6856, 19594, 447, 17951, 11304, 23037, 4987, 21398, 20736, 5501, 20895, 1399, 16882, 9357, 1439, 2139, 5003, 11010, 24362, 11638, 5002, 914, 2778, 8700, 19258, 17074, 2389, 10834, 2415, 2286, 8616, 19387, 18587, 4017, 24154, 606, 12254, 14229, 1670, 8314, 6618, 1160, 17894, 2294, 22693, 1120, 8147, 4945, 1187, 3826, 10997, 20044, 23575, 4832, 24333, 99, 22459, 9060, 2079, 7431, 14502, 1474, 20966, 980, 18105, 14493, 377, 464, 18967, 20887, 22662, 5696, 3499, 5862, 5363, 10122, 17000, 298, 23176, 24359, 6346, 11485, 11290, 20951, 9618, 3743, 10084, 5953, 76, 12723, 1714, 4623, 9163, 4597, 16056, 10417, 5754, 8662, 3581, 14979, 429, 3192, 3533, 23125, 11557, 815, 16779, 18267, 6217, 17680, 21193, 12952, 24585, 1025, 20239, 20093, 11086, 6212, 23400, 23696, 22007, 13248, 7980, 8313, 6410, 17380, 22789, 19360, 66, 15084, 7919, 6024, 11943, 3038, 5539, 24437, 170, 15275, 22457, 3280, 6698, 20110, 20822, 349, 11881, 18243, 6816, 12407, 5674, 24171, 19714, 8762, 9332, 807, 14653, 15199, 7491, 21845, 18380, 20806, 12530, 18542, 20139, 3969, 4156, 22873, 23048, 16060, 11763, 14137, 19208, 8320, 14457, 17487, 25267, 17671, 8744, 21107, 23686, 14066, 11428, 12496, 538, 16529, 9329, 10394, 9960, 17084, 6030, 16421, 1542, 3237, 10590, 14916, 2560, 14240, 22935, 7874, 21705, 24783, 13839, 24739, 23842, 15846, 24687, 16934, 22769, 19383, 4574, 11168, 17964, 12053, 22477, 11287, 2997, 23643, 17370, 17173, 8496, 19505, 15096, 24408, 12875, 2660, 9521, 15416, 586, 2801, 24091, 10543, 8531, 18253, 21460, 14937, 6945, 7459, 18375, 17999, 9032, 20725, 11875, 3641, 23201, 20078, 17933, 1829, 406, 13618, 14560, 6250, 2259, 2185, 548, 6619, 5249, 13796, 20724, 23494, 17150, 22839, 6313, 10052, 9312, 10254, 2546, 465, 21997, 14141, 22064, 20862, 6551, 18901, 16469, 22279, 16709, 16183, 4427, 1129, 20464, 1517, 2193, 13450, 14514, 21471, 16725, 3803, 21311, 12388, 13648, 23464, 6315, 13890, 25450, 14373, 17942, 1232, 16516, 12084, 17090, 6720, 1455, 6649, 18796, 5179, 14588, 21306, 2182, 16891, 8735, 15329, 16905, 19172, 15308, 7672, 17660, 18120, 3372, 22810, 2312, 18812, 17601, 19542, 8467, 12213, 25176, 8935, 18126, 12896, 7425, 8484, 21510, 6302, 16985, 23415, 2788, 16368, 12054, 6048, 17402, 6620, 19006, 14108, 7372, 12426, 18880, 20917, 17556, 15855, 16070, 5256, 1447, 11929, 20299, 14868, 2836, 18525, 20577, 25531, 20135, 22075, 25422, 12046, 22278, 15513, 10928, 16107, 2620, 11862, 24750, 1509, 8868, 24142, 19070, 1334, 22674, 16644, 12850, 15839, 2852, 9846, 10491, 11034, 23847, 20394, 12649, 9673, 24866, 9471, 340, 10680, 9556, 241, 4581, 18550, 12625, 8657, 7601, 25363, 9999, 14273, 17327, 7043, 3417, 6759, 14383, 22420, 3847, 15584, 11756, 9808, 1027, 8209, 12138, 24395, 2141, 3921, 14324, 10493, 14611, 24937, 19028, 15048, 10291, 6694, 10077, 8051, 8092, 11648, 9374, 20963, 6767 ]
reddit_dump_-Deep_Blue-
[ [ "The wording is not awkward, I just don't think you want to understand.\n\nSomeone becomes a baker of their own free will, and then not the state, nor private individuals, nor god himself, has the right to decide when that person will bake a cake, how they will bake a cake, where they will bake a cake, or for who they will bake a cake for. Full stop. \n\nAnd libertarianism does give a right to discriminate, but not oppress, so you failed to understand two things.", "2" ], [ "Well I don't want to hang around leftist zealots who want to talk about how much they hate <PERSON> every second of every day in every public corner of internet or on every single street, building, organization, or radio or TV channel they can get their hands on. The annoyance level is OFF. THE. FUCKING. CHARTS.\n\nAt some point, apolitcal people who didn't care one way or the other are just going to punch you in the face.", "965" ], [ "It is indeed possible that people in subreddits can say some pretty nasty shit. But in regards to said shit, it's either all okay, or none of it is. That is kind of the basis of free speech. Without which, subreddits like AHS have the tools they need, even without little nudes, to go after other subreddits to their hearts' content.", "126" ], [ "Oh well if you like that freedom and equality thing, maybe you should abandon the same room as the leftists and join us in the Right to LibRight rooms. We do that freedom and equality thing HARD! You want to say some shit? Say it! You want to eat shit??? You go man! You do you! Ain't nobody stopping ya! And nothing says equality like 9mm Glocks for all. Fun for the whole family too!", "965" ], [ "Did you read the little message in the top-right corner of the OP pic? <PERSON> copied it all out for us in bigger type. The pic is also a parody of a tweet about RBGs death, here is the original [_URL_0_](_URL_0_) . This is not about opinions, this person expresses a desire to see this sub shut down and is using this to bring some negative attention to it. I don't think it will work, but fuck them, and anybody else for trying. Just leave the sub at that point, and don't try to get it banned for everyone else who wants to stay.", "434" ], [ "> They see the black person as less able, or think they wouldn't fit with the rest of the team, or maybe that they might steal from the company. \n\nSounds like you got an unconscious bias against HR people and their capabilities to not be biased.\n\nBut I guess, if a POC doesn't get the job, the answer is always \"bias\" right? Never mind any other factor that could have played a part. Only one answer is valid.", "205" ], [ "I so want to join you with the grilling, just two buddies, beer, and bratwurst. But if we do that, then the garbage you mention will only grow stronger. We need to stand out and stand up! Draw a line in sand! Wave a flag! Whatever! Just stop this crap!\n\nHow long do you think it will take anyway before your grill offends the latest perceptive truth of the day and needs to be taken away? I don't think nearly as long as we believe.", "673" ], [ "> which would allow preferential treatment for things like affirmative action, but still ban discrimination.\n\n\"Which would allow racism, but still ban racism\"\n\n > affirmative action is not racial discrimination, even though I know you want it to be. \n\nAffirmative action is racial discrimination aka *racism ,* even though I know you don't want it to be.", "205" ], [ "> Ok but how\n\nBy giving discriminatory or preferential treatment based on race using a criteria.\n\n > Words are meaningless if they can just mean anything you want at any given time\n\nAgreed, and I think you've been going to online dictionaries for any definitions on racism. Here is where a problem arises...\n\n > There is no definition of racism that defines preferential treatment based on race as it.\n\nThere is. You can find it on definition #4 under \"racism\" on [_URL_2_](_URL_0_) along with four other definitions. With dictionaries, words are often defined using a descriptive or prescriptive context. A prescriptive definition is when a dictionary defines the word as how it should be used. A descriptive definition defines a word based on how it it is used among its speakers. For a very long time, descriptive has been the rule of the day in dictionaries, but in regards to the word \"racism\" activists have been pressuring dictionaries to change the definition, from a descriptive one such as \" racial or ethnic prejudice or intolerance\" (the one I'm giving you), to a prescriptive one of \" a policy, system of government, etc., that is associated with or originated in such a doctrine, and that favors members of the dominant racial or ethnic group, or has a neutral effect on their life experiences, while discriminating against or harming members of other groups, ultimately serving to preserve the social status, economic advantage, or political power of the dominant group.\" (the one one I think you're giving me)\n\nThere was a time within the year, the \"systemic\" version of the definition did not exist in the dictionaries. It only does now because as mentioned, there are politically activists groups who wanted to force it in, regardless of how the general populace used it. There was first a women who was successful in getting [Merriam-Webster to change its definition](_URL_3_) (its funny, she had people disagreeing with her on the definition of racism, so instead of trying to win any argument, she thought she would just aim to change the dictionary to *her* definition), and then they've just been going [right down the line](_URL_1_) every since, and not just by race, but to fulfil the preferences of all kinds of identity activists.\n\nSo it is true that words have meanings in a given place at a given time, and among different people, but the dictionaries that should describe those meanings are currently being subject to political manipulation to *tell* people how to use a word, a definition used by only one group of activists. I've understood mine, and the 1st definition about it being an ideology, have been in the dictionary for a long time because that is what's been historically used. I have never in my life heard the latest until in the last decade. Yours was made up to suit the political needs of a political group for a particular time.\n\n > That’s just not how it works.\n\nI agree that's not how it should work. And this is for the purpose of weaponizing it so that they can support affirmative action polices and say such programs are not racist because \"only the system, or the people who benefit from it, can be racist, so a social program with a criteria of racial discrimination in the name of fighting systemic racism, is not racism\". Using mine, they could only say \"A social program that is to be implemented through a criteria of racial discrimination, is racist\"\n\nMy definition is still there is slot #4 on _URL_2_ (for now) and one of only two in the Oxford dictionary (which doesn't even include the systemic version). So I can still say giving preferential treatment based on race is discriminatory and racist. You are only going by the systemic version to justify your claim that \"Preferential treatment based on reason and data ≠ discrimination or prejudice\", *reason and data* that is based, I'm sure, on the ideas of systemic racism.", "715" ], [ "I understand and see how it is. But you know what? In LibRight land, you don't have to wait for any government for a more equal, more equitable society. You can get together with other like-minded individuals and start creating one today! No one needs to give you permission! You can just get right to it. You can have taxes, equal distribution of resources, or just for certain needs, whatever you want. You can say that everyone is equal and no one is the leader, or do everything with democracy. It's fantastic! And you know what else is great? Only those who want to be a part of it can do so. Those of us who'd rather do something else like grill all day can do that instead. \n\nSo what say ye? Feel like coming over to the great ol jolly land of the yellow quadrant? (we got cooookies!!)", "627" ], [ "Oh man I feel crappy from hearing that, so sorry. It is good to hear you trying though. I hope it doesn't get so bad you have to leave the place if you like it.\n\nKey thought mentioned: based on all the voting I've seen it do from afar, I never would have thought of CO as a libertarian state. They seem hella leftist if I just go by what the voting looks like.", "644" ], [ "I didn't want to talk about this, but I have some information for your question. This comes from some of my musings on libertarianism and even though it comes from that perspective, I think it will be useful to others. You see there being a conflict and you are right. The right of the mother for bodily autonomy, and the baby's right to life. But what are the rights for? To create freedom. Freedom for the mother to do what she wants with her life and freedom for the baby to have a life to do something with. \n\nA libertarian values freedom heavily and wants it for all, but there is a conflict between the baby's freedoms and the mother's. What do we do in this case? Among libertarians, this is recognized and there is large split between them. But I think there is a solution and I haven't heard this talked about personally from them. If we deny the rights of one, there will be a loss of freedoms for the other and that will be sad. However, the loss of freedoms are not equal. A mother has some freedoms removed for carrying the child to term, but they are not completely removed (she can still live a life, if but for some inconvenience), and this is only temporary (the months she is pregnant). For the baby, the loss of a life is a complete loss of all freedom. \n\nSo how should a system legislate when there is a conflict of freedoms such as this? I would say they should consider which action produces the most net freedom and go with that. That would be with siding with the child and so a pro-life decision.\n\nMany people are not libertarians, but the issue of liberty and freedom come up a lot as concerns by some, mainly liberals (this thought process is not considered by many who are religious I find). I think if those are important aspects, they can come to respect this thought process.", "626" ], [ "Politics is built on compromise; anyone who doesn't will always lose. By participating in the GOP coalition, we participate knowing who we are and what we stand for, but we acknowledge also that we must work with others to see any of those principles become a reality, even with those we might disagree with. There is no shame in this. Others in the GOP are making the same decision to help everyone in it, so as to also help themselves.", "313" ], [ "> Can't you see that the leftist trend is inevitable?\n\nNothing is inevitable unless we do nothing.\n\n > There needs to be a principled alternative besides socialism when shit hits the fan.\n\nIndeed, and that principled alternative is the freedom movement in all its forms. I simply suggest the best way to be that in the place that we are and with the tools that we have, is by working through the GOP coalition. If the socialist left can achieve so much through the democratic coalition, why can't we expect the same success?", "285" ], [ "> <PERSON> also did nothing to court the liberty movement\n\nI might say he did, but whether he did or didn't isn't entirely the point I'm hoping to make. I am saying we should support the coalition of the GOP. <PERSON> is not ideal, but he is but one player in a team sport. By supporting the team in all positions, we hope to all win something. I think libertarian policy passed in the legislature would have had a better chance of being signed by <PERSON>. What are the chances of that happening under <PERSON>? I think next to zero.", "211" ], [ "> you’re also assuming if <PERSON> wasnt on the ballot that every libertarian would have voted <PERSON>\n\nI haven't forgotten that. I am imploring those who who would have stayed at home, or voted <PERSON> if there had been no LP candidate, to have supported the GOP coalition. This year, supporting that meant supporting <PERSON>. I do hope libertarians will do more in the future to help the coalition.\n\n > there are left libertarians \n\nI have been a libertarian type involved in the politics of the movement for a long time, and I know people going by that label are the minority. They aren't who I am speaking too.\n\n > i mean we’ll leave it up to the courts but a man who has ran for president before and didnt even get close to being on the ballot when he was sane, now is what 77-78 and 3/4 senile won with a record amount of votes... seems sus \n\nIndeed, and maybe the courts will announce something different than everyone expected. But regardless if that is the case, I still encourage libertarians to support the GOP coalition in the future so events like this don't happen again.", "92" ], [ "You cannot guarantee that any election will be as close as this one. In 2016, <PERSON> one an unprecedented part of the libertarian vote with 3.31%, three times more than <PERSON>. It appears though that <PERSON> didn't need it that time to win. They are also very uncommon. The last time could be considered 2000 <PERSON> vs <PERSON>. In that one, it came down to a really tight margin, and in only one key state. How many could have even predicted that would happen? \n\nThe parties and politicians make a lot of their appeals based on who they think they need to win, but based on what I mentioned, I believe it is a very ineffective strategy strategy for libertarians to try to court those appeals on the hope that the election will be tight.\n\nInstead, I believe a better idea is to work through he major party apparatus of the GOP. This has already proven effective by the fact that some libertarian types have already been elected under the party ticket. Imagine what could be accomplished if we all put our effort into it, we could change the face of the GOP.", "939" ], [ "I have been a proponent of free market policies my entire life. It is very insulting then to insinuate that I would ever support leftist economic policies. \n\nAs to using the LP to court appeal the GOP, I think that is a very ineffective strategy. As I told someone else on this post, you cannot guarantee that any election will be as close as this one. In 2016, <PERSON> won an unprecedented part of the libertarian vote with 3.31%, three times more than <PERSON>. It appears though that <PERSON> didn't need it that time to win. They are also very uncommon. The last time could be considered 2000 Bush vs <PERSON>. In that one, it came down to a really tight margin, and in only one key state. How many could have even predicted that would happen?\n\nInstead of waiting for a chance like that to occur (which may not even be spotted by the GOP), I believe a better idea is to work through the major party apparatus of the GOP. This has already proven effective by the fact that some libertarian types have already been elected under the party ticket. If you believe the party is sick, then it is all the more of an opportunity for us to come in and try to remake it to our liking. Imagine what could be accomplished if we all put our effort into it, we could change the face of the GOP to that of strong libertarian party.", "953" ], [ "I am so sorry to hear that your relatives had to go through that, and I am so sorry those leftists just insulted their memory, but I can't say I'm surprised. They have no pity for any human life that they don't see as one of their own. A person is either a good communist, or they are a subhuman that needs to be put down. It's this superiority complex that makes them dangerous and merciless. \n\nI hope no one has to go through something like what your great uncle did ever again.", "965" ], [ "> But you're trying to use libertarianism and capitalism almost interchangeably and this doesnt work.\n\nI believe I can use them interchangeably. Capitalism relates to the economy, and libertarianism relates to a vision for government. Since libertarianism philosophy is about maximum personal liberty, a capitalist economy is a package deal.\n\n > there would not be a single capitalist country in the world since there isn't a state on earth that actually has 'no system' \n > \n > Since thats not the reality \\*anywhere\\*, its a moot point to argue about \n\nThis is all true to some extent, but if it is entirely true, socialist and fascist types wouldn't feel the need to do anything to increase power right? We aren't completely free, but we aren't complete unfree either. I was talking theory, but the interesting thing is that even though all countries in the world don't ascribe to a free market 100%, several come close. I don't need my theory implemented to perfection to still make valid points, for example...\n\n > you are NOT able to opt out of it \n\nIn a relatively free society and market, there is proof that you can. In the US we have religious groups like the Amish who cloister themselves away from world, reject technology, and actually do share a lot of their labor and resources among eachother. In the state of Virginia, I happen to know of a small, fully egalitarian community called Twin Oaks. It has about 100 who do not claim private property and share everything in a communal way. The US is not a completely free market or society, but it is closer than other places in the world; and in this setting, these communities are what are would definitely call \"opting out\". \n\nI would see the ability of people to live like this expanded, and less regulation and taxes relating to the central government to allow them greater freedom. How much easier then would it be for communities like this to start up and flourish. Such a wonderful thought.\n\n > Also wouldn't libertarianism be defined through at least guaranteeing freedoms to its people? Otherwise wouldn't it just be anarchy? \n\nAbsolutely true. We aren't anarchists.\n\n > So if I start to make an actual dictatorship inside that libertarian system, force more and more people to start paying taxes to me, and persecuting political enemies, wouldn't the libertarian entity have to step in, therefore meaning I can't even actually opt out (or in) of the libertarian system? \n\nYes, because what I said was \"if a person wants to give up that freedom *voluntarily*, then who is the government to judge that they can't?\". If you go around *forcing* people into your own personal dictatorship and attacking people who disagreed with that, a libertarian type government would step in. \n\nAgain, a libertarian society seeks to create an environment and market that is as free as possible. A free environment is by it's nature a blank slate, a void, so there isn't really anything to \"opt out\" from. People fill the void with their own systems and arrangements in this, and people will voluntarily participate or not with what they want -- that can include a private dictatorship that people can voluntarily submit themselves to. If anyone inside a free society forces others to join in on their system, that is taking away people's choice to opt in, and that is when a libertarian government would step in to preserve the freedom of choice for the individual to opt in or not. \n\nI hope that clarifies.", "627" ], [ "> If you’re European and an AnCap i frankly don’t trust your knowledge of the political spectrum in any country, because you’re already so far right your entire world view is skewed to think the market gives a fuck about your well-being\n\nIf you are American, and an AOC-Bernie lover, I would definitely not trust a single word you had to say judging the political spectrum of anything. You are so far to the left, your entire world view is skewed by socialist brainwashers who don't give a fuck about your freedom.", "285" ], [ "> Being at peace with myself is not worth trying to live a life filled with nothing but threat mitigation and damage control. \n\nThis is true, and this isn't what I'm proposing entirely. I believe we should work within the GOP to further the freedom movement. It is already receptive to some of our ideas and many are ripe for conversion. And by running our own candidates in the party, it will be conservatives who will need to compromise with us as we further our goals of a freer country. We just need be willing to be active in the GOP coalition and put in the effort. Nothing about that speaks about damage control and threat mitigation to me; it sounds like actual progression.", "604" ], [ "> in fact the ideology originally came from libertarian communism/socialism.\n\nI know this, but I haven't been defining it in that way. You are right that I live in America, and for other Americans, the word \"libertarian\" almost exclusively defines an ideology that supports a free society and free market. It makes communication simpler for us, but if you are not American, I am sorry for any confusion. I know in Europe and maybe other parts of the world, the more accurate term would be \"classical liberal\"? If so, you can substitute \"libertarian\" for that in my texts.\n\nI feel I already made enough relevant points earlier that to address your other points would be just be me repeating myself. I don't have anything more to add then.", "627" ], [ "If this is about Fox calling some states early for <PERSON>, I really don't think we should hold that against them. They and the AP hired projectors who were using different models for projection than the other major newscasters. They called certain states ealier than others and Fox managers listened and trusted that their predictions were correct. Maybe next time, they'll use the same models as everyone else.", "6" ], [ "My theory is that maybe if they wanted to invalidate a ballot for <PERSON>, they couldn't just affect the vote for <PERSON> and needed to throw out the entire ballot. In that case, they didn't want to throw out a vote for <PERSON>, even if the rest of the ballot was for other republican candidates. We suspect there was a lot of ticket splitting this year as many republicans still don't like <PERSON>, but did like a lot of their local republican candidates running. That's my theory anyway.\n\nI also am not sure about a large, organized effort to commit fraud, but I do think that smaller, independent actors could easily have done it. We are getting stories that individuals handling the votes could have been doing stuff, and without the knowledge of their county clerks, or local secretary of the state knowing about it. We won't know the extent of this, and who all was involved, until several investigations are done.", "103" ], [ "> We have to keep voting gold, and keep getting more people to vote for freedom over a security state.\n\nI absolutely agree that we need keep getting people more freedom and reduce the power of the state, but I do not see the LP as being the best strategy for that anymore. In first-past-the-post system like ours, you need a large amount of people to get past the 51% required in states and districts, so libertarians will never win on their own. We need the help of others, and the GOP is a coalition who can help make that happen. By working inside it, we have a much better chance of getting our candidates into office, and our policies passed. But we must work as a team and that means working with others we may not agree 100% on. But compromise is the nature of politics and it's how any of us are going to see the freedom movement advance.", "736" ], [ "Comparing the GOP to a monolithic, singular entity that is completely against libertarian values is an unfair comparison. They are a coalition of many groups such as conservatives, christians, pro-business groups, and patriots, and not all of them are against our values completely. Christians may not like gay marriage, but they do care for freedom of religion; a conservative may want tougher borders, but are often a proponent of free markets. It is this commonality that we can find agreement on, and as I mentioned previously, there are already libertarians working within the party to better those relationships between groups and make our voices more influential among them. With their help, we can push to make things like ranked choice voting an issue in the party, just like the democrats did in Maine. It could happen, but only if we do not try to do it all by ourselves.", "604" ], [ "It is unfortunate that they require flair for so many things, but it is a protection mechanism that keeps leftist trolls out and we should be thankful for that at least. I think that's the main reason their sub has been able to remain open during this time when the leftists were flooding the other rightwing subs. I have been looking around this one and I think they haven't been coming here too often because it's been under their radar so far (keep on guard mods cause that can change if more people start floating into this sub). \n\nIf you really want flair though on r/conservative, you will need to ask a mod. [Here are the rules](_URL_0_) they have about that. But personally, I don't see why you would want to post there too often when all they do is link articles all day. In places like here, articles, discussions, and memes are all encouraged and I like that diversity personally. And we're just going to see more people come in if r/trump and r/republican remain private.", "728" ], [ "I would say we allow the courts to look into the voter fraud and if there isn't enough to overturn the results, that's when it can be called. But it won't matter to a lot of us that <PERSON> is legitimate or not, his coalition is still what's causing all the problems for our country and we will not stop fighting them however we can. \n\nThank you for checking in though mate, we always appreciate our global conservative friends (oh but I'm sorry, it's \"liberal\" in Australia yes? LoL)", "210" ], [ "Actually, the word \"liberal\" predates \"libertarian\" and even the grand majority of American history so the American progressives didn't really have much influence here. \n\nWhen it first was coined in Europe, liberal represented almost all the ideas we might ascribe to libertarianism. Around the 1800s, there was a split in the liberal movement. Individual freedom and liberty were still the goal, but some saw government action and intervention as means to help this. These people began to be known as \"social liberals\" and those who disagree were termed \"classical liberalism\". The two sides went around the world espousing their views. In America and Canada, the social liberals became dominant and the \"social\" part was dropped along the way so we began to think that was the only form of liberalism. While in places like Australia, the \"classical liberals\" became dominant. The \"classical\" part was dropped there and so now you have the Liberal Party of Australia being the dominant party of free markets and individual liberty", "285" ], [ "Here are some things to think about. During the cold war, the Soviet Union union was very aggressive in its foreign policy and was fostering communism around the globe. Their actions included sending weapons to foreign communist combatants, funding communist movements in other countries, statecraft to bribe or coerce leaders into their sphere, and outright military invasion of sovereign countries. They did not care if anyone disapproved. The only ones who had any power to stop this was the US and its allies. The Vietnam war was just the latest battleground for this, and many forget that the Soviets were actively interring by supporting North Vietnam with everything from weapons, vehicles, and personnel support. \n\nConsidering this, was it right for the Soviet Union to interfere? If not, shouldn't someone have interceded? This show was just part 2 of feature that played out on the Korean peninsula. The Soviets supported the north, the US the south, and today, South Korea is free society with a very high standard of living while the North is a dictatorial hell hole. The same story could have played out in Vietnam. Had the north been stopped, wouldn't South Vietnam have had the chance to follow in the same path as South Korea? US involvement in Vietnam failed in this objective, but if freedom from dictatorship for South Vietnamese was ever important, one must wonder if there wasn't a duty to at least try.", "959" ], [ "I gave a reason, but don't think you read my larger post for it. I define racism here using definition #1 [for the Oxford](_URL_1_) , and definition #4 [here](_URL_0_). By these definitions, giving preferential or discriminator treatment based on race is racism. It does not matter what criteria you use to justify that, whether science, statistics, economics, or any other \"rational\" basis. \n\nYour constant assertion that it is not exhibits a racialized mindset trying to justify it's own desire to discriminate and it is very worrisome to see. You should just admit you want to discriminate on the basis of racism and be done with it.", "715" ], [ "Two ideas on that. The first is that Socialism is the umbrella term for all collectivist and redistributive ideologies. I think this is because the word is older and predates most others like \"communism\", so socialism is the big tent word for communism, social democracy, syndicalism, etc.\n\nThe second is when a split occurred in Europe during <PERSON>'s time. There was debate among Marxist followers about the means to achieve the grand the workers paradise they wanted. Some said a violent revolution needed to happen to overthrow the ruling classes and establish a worker's government; others said that a revolution wasn't necessary and that Marxist visions could be achieved through a legislative, and democratic process. The ones who advocated the violent revolution became the communists and the those for the latter were termed \"socialists\". I think communism stayed relatively coherent for a long time, but socialists broke up into different versions of itself like social democracy, democratic socialism, and some forms of leftist anarchism.", "534" ], [ "This assumes you know what people need, what they don't, and are willing to put forth the costs for fulfilling those needs without any compensation to yourself for providing them. That takes work and the incentive to do that work is profit. Also, you can get it wrong. It is often the arrogance of AuthLefts to think they know what people need and what they don't, and that they can provide them without incentives when in reality, no AuthLeft government has ever been able to do it affectively without force and coercion. \n\nJust leave the arrogance at the door and the production to those willing to do it for compensation. We all know AuthLefts can't do it without whips and chains.", "246" ], [ "I helped family members collect unsold food from grocery stores and brought them to food banks to give to them homeless. One day, the local government said we could no longer do that. Someone complained and said some food given was expired. Because of that, we and grocery stores were forced to stop giving to the homeless.\n\nDaddy government knows best kids.", "997" ], [ "Oh I would be on LibLeft if I thought they were all about fun town. But no, LibLefts are becoming as moralistic as old church ladies. Theme parks are capitalist, porn is sexist, liking reggae if white is racist. The only thing they allow with no particular limits is drugs (I'll keep my fingers crossed); for everything else, a particular \"ist\" tries to put a turd in the punchbowl for everyone.", "965" ], [ "I said, by these definitions, giving preferential or *discriminatory* treatment based on race is racism. \"Discrimination\" is in there. \n\nBut think it through, if you are being discriminatory against one, you are automatically being preferential to another. That's just logical, and in that, there is a relation to \"preference\" and \"discrimination\" that make them both bad for the purposes of deciding things based on race. Would you like me to *prefer* a black person in a selection, or *discriminate* against a black person in a selection? Either is actually wrong because race should not be the basis for any selection criteria.\n\nBut I'm thinking you are saying it does. Well as I have been saying, any criteria that allows for preferential or discriminatory treatment based on race is racist. You are a racist for saying otherwise, and the mental gymnastics you are doing to justify how you are not would put olympians to shame. By the rules of LibLeft, I now get to call you a fascist and am to hope you die a slow, and untimely death.", "715" ], [ "If the black man has a good business plan and presents it to the bank, it would be the same as the cookie -- they would be fools for turning down a loan to him becomes the interest on that loan is how they make their money, and if they don't make that money, someone else might (like a competitor \\*shudder\\*). They have a profit incentive to not be racist.\n\nI think the perception is from leftists like you is that businesses are greedy and only want money, until there is a black person to hate, then they are ALL about hating those black people. /s", "499" ], [ "I am not thinking that because of I've spent more time off this sub than on it; I only discovered this place like a week ago. I've met these people IRL, or got to read there unironic statements on Twitter, Youtube, FB, etc.\n\nTheir making sure everyone gets to join the party should not mean: I can't go to the theme park because I'm an enabler of capitalism and hate the poor, I can't watch porn because \"male gaze\" or some shit and it's making me secretly want to rape women, and I shouldn't like reggae because that's the whole cultural appropriation thing so I'm a bloody thief, and you know, racist. Lots of judgement, scolding, and all around moral grandstanding occurs around this. It reminds me of when I was younger of my old aunt <PERSON>. She'd come back from her Baptist choir practice, caught me masturbating to Loony Toons, and I got hit in the head with a bible so hard, Proverbs 26:11 lifted off the page and onto me. Without that verse in the book, I guess she wouldn't have known I was just going to do it again :).\n\n\\*Sigh\\*, <PERSON> was truly based AuthRight.", "272" ], [ "I just got to say, \n\n* commerce is an activity, capitalism is an economic philosophy. \n* Commerce occurs within captalism, and but can also occur outside of it. \n* Buying, selling, lending, and barrowing are activities in capitalism and may be apart of approved commerce activity depending on the place.\n\n Just wanted to get the terms correct.", "101" ], [ "This crazed behavior to infest the \"revolution\" into every little thing, it is not LibLeft, so much as it is religious zealotry. It is destroying not just reddit, but other online communities as well. They truly believe there cause needs to be broadcast in every corner online, offline, on TV, on radio, and on god forsaken Mars every. fucking. second. every. fucking. day. And to them, death is too good a punishment for anyone who gets in their way.\n\nWe need to fight back against these pricks; and in the online sphere, we can do things like be present, tell them to fuck off, and generally make it a hostile environment for them, but the biggest weapon of choice in this war is going to be the Ban Hammer. These people are seeking mod positions in subreddits I don't think they even care about, just so they can ban anyone they see as a threat to them and \"cleanse\" the grounds for their brethren. You get the mod positions, or keep them if you already have them, and you ban their asses if they try to take over. Simply say politics are not allowed if the subs apolitical. You can also send messages to encourage current mods who might be hesitant to do so; make them realize the threat. I don't care if that sounds harsh, these people are militant and it's like a game (or maybe more like a war) to take over these places.\n\nOur communities both here and elsewhere can be excellent places for so many, as long as we keep them excellent. All it might take is a few well placed scum bags to drag them down into a shithole where there is no getting out.\n\nDo what you can out there. The internet will thank you.", "126" ], [ "It is that way for now hopefully, but it could change very quickly. At some point, you'll hear the conversations change, and then, it will be non-stop. Everything will be about race. Economics, politics, lifestyle, hiring choices, buying choices, even how your hair is styled (in America, it became racist by many for a white person to style there hair in dreadlocks). I saw BLM protests in London, Berlin, and Paris, so I know there are people who would like to change the conversation to this. You must not let them.", "577" ], [ "I can see the idea is unpopular. Do you think I want to write this? Do you think I want to suggest taking away free speech after for decades feeling like it is a sacred right? It makes me unhappy to have to say this, but tolerating attempts to silence speech, is enabling the destruction of free speech and I for one don't feel like I can stand idly by and watch that happen.\n\nTo clarify, this in regards to attempts to shut down free speech only. The fascist can say whatever they want, and I would defend their right to say it; but if they move from shouting support of their ideology, to the encouragement to silence all opposition, that is not something we should stand idly by for. In order to preserve free speech, we must oppose those who want to destroy it in more than just argument.", "865" ], [ "I'm sure they do. The difference being though is that I won't do anything about them if they don't try to silence me, or anyone else. It is when they do call for silencing us, then that we need to stop them, and stop them hard.\n\nNo idea of value worth preserving, never had a time it didn't need to be defended at one time or another. Free speech is an idea worth preserving, and thus, worth defending.", "865" ], [ "> the US was going to war and needed the US worker's participation\n\nThey would have fought just like everyone else because, you know, draft. \n\n > it is strategically smart to make capitalism look good, before you start persecuting people who don't like capitalism. \n\nCapitalism will always look bad to socialists whether or not they're persecuted. But if appeasement is such a good strategy, how about you appease me? I want a free society with extremely low taxes, and hardly any regulations, and a near non-existent welfare state. You going to do that for me? Pretty please? I promise I won't burn government buildings and rundown leftists on the road if you do. 🥺 🤲", "1014" ], [ "> This sounds exactly like what a socialist would say about a capitalist\n\nOf course they would. Unlike any capitalist literature I know of, it is absolute dogma of the socialists to oppose capitalism everywhere -- to destroy it where it exists, and to snuff it out before it begins. So we got to destroy them so they can't destroy us. \n\n > Probably best to let everyone stick forks in whatever electrical outlet they choose. \n\nI would love for that to happen. Everyone just do whatever stupid thing they want. But the socialists are an exception in that they forcefully grab others by the hand, before they go sticking the fork in. They can't help it. They reach out, forcefully grab people and don't let go, and let the shock travel down the line. As Ancaps, that is brutal force we cannot tolerate.", "870" ], [ "> I have a B.S in Economics.\n\nCool. So do I, plus two more in marketing research and business.\n\n > The field is dominated by ideology more than science.\n\nThat is only among the leftist ideologues in economics. I have literally seen acknowledgement by them that certain economic data proves one of their arguments wrong, but I then it is said \"but who the fuck cares. We are morally right even if the data says it is economically wrong\" (I really heard a fellow student say that)\n\n > I consider myself more like a Post-Keynesian or ecological economics, which are heterodoxies in the field.\n\nI'm glad you acknowledge that they're heterodox\n\n > Classical economics include <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON>\n\nI have never heard <PERSON> included as a classical economist, but I have heard debate on if he was even an economist at all. If he was, he is labeled as heterodox.\n\n > economics, the least scientific of all social sciences\n\nYou have got to be fucking kidding me. There are mathematics and models in macro-economics, and at the micro level, there are all kinds of opportunities for behavioral analysis and experimentation. What kind of mathematical laws like supply and demand or calculations for dead-weight loss are equivalent in anthropology or history (which I'm not even sure is are social sciences). Only sociology can compare.\n\nYou got your B.S. in Economics, but I am wondering if you weren't being selectively attentive in your education. Or were you like some of the other students I knew and you threw out what was inconvenient to believing what you wanted about it. Either way, I'm not going to waste any more time on one so obviously biased in their understanding of the field.", "569" ], [ "> racial inequality does little detriment to the majority of the population, and yet I would unequivocally vote to fight racial inequality. \n\nAnd then...\n\n > I vote for the candidate that will produce the most amount of good for the most amount of people in a utilitarian framework. \n\nThen the utilitarian framework requires you to vote for the good of any majority against the good of a minority. I'm not blaming you if you meant something different, but what you said in the first statement is not compatible with a utilitarian moral framework.", "230" ], [ "What they are wanting is something akin to what North Korea does. In that country, they keep a record on any time you, or a relative of yours, went against the government. It doesn't have to be full on rebellion, you could just criticize it. The record of any infractions on this will affect you, and your family, in all areas of life, from work prospects, to advancement in your job, to food rations, and access to medical care and housing.\n\nThe authoritarian mindset of these fucks boils my blood.", "651" ], [ "Yeah, there's nothing serious about it. The way it was told to me is there was only purple to choose from when this sub first began. That was because the original political compass creator made the LibRight quadrant purple. But many LibRights didn't like that as there already was a strong political association with their ideologies and the color yellow, just like AuthRight blue, and AuthLeft red (LibLeft doesn't have a strongly associated political color yet. The green is just for convenience for now). So they demanded it be included and a yellow flair was produced, but the purple one still remained a choice.", "274" ], [ "I don't think the Republicans changed it. One of the major TV news stations followed the presidential results live and made Republican won states red and Democratic states blue. This was arbitrary and had no purpose other than to differentiate the states, but it was such a popular thing for the TV viewers watching, they became the de facto colors of the parties even though it was never official.", "313" ], [ "I avoid debating socialists most of the time. They are too dense and too radicalized these days to ever adopt a new idea. However, I do something else, something different. I look strategically for those who doubt, for those not solid in their faith, and I will see if I can engage with them. I don't \"debate\" in those cases either, I normally plant ideas or guide them to predetermined solution in the natural path of a conversation. I will even lie, pretending I am a more moderate version of themselves, and with that, I hope to sway them to my way of thinking. This is also very effective on those who are not socialist or liberal, or for those who are apolitical. \n\nThe opposite of this can also be done to galvanize those against them. I once had a moderate co-worker who didn't care for politics, but a socialist kept on trying to talk to her. In private conversations, I asked what she would talk about with them, and then go on to say how it all sounded so stupid, and it was obviously a ploy to brainwash her to their side, \"but you're too smart for them I know\". \n\nI think my methods have been effective in some ways. I encourage others to use a strategic touch as well.", "877" ], [ "No. I mean the hatred of money has caused many evils. I don't believe in a single root of all evil, but I do think there are things that cause a great deal of it, and I believe one of those things is the hatred of money. I do not need to speak much to explain than to simply mention communism.\n\nCommunism sprouted from a hatred of class; people who have money and people who don't. It also had a hatred of need and how money was required to buy what was needed. So it envisioned a world where everyone was equal in wealth and money would be eradicated.\n\nI don't think I need to type further to explain the atrocities committed by communism to obtain its goals.", "101" ], [ "Offhand, I know one big case of one not being broken up, but being greatly diminished, and that is Microsoft. I remember when many people said it was a monopoly that would never be overtaken by the market and the government needed to step in and break it up. But then, we saw the rise of major competitors like Google and Apple, and there are smaller competitors nipping at it from every direction as hot tech companies continue to push the envelope of what can be done. We cannot say Microsoft is a monopoly any more", "99" ] ]
380
[ 40, 5122, 19256, 19425, 21674, 7677, 6026, 4634, 20713, 1535, 18031, 25021, 14720, 19807, 4039, 12448, 11928, 14707, 479, 15902, 20017, 8006, 16569, 18349, 19441, 11565, 15098, 13822, 25207, 18767, 8077, 19184, 5210, 15211, 22207, 11496, 11824, 5759, 22156, 22688, 23293, 1499, 12877, 12744, 1011, 5463, 9665, 18379, 13666, 7451, 16611, 1927, 25521, 887, 23364, 23944, 7452, 25508, 14821, 23107, 2112, 5835, 8993, 10327, 4163, 3223, 5735, 6741, 19730, 15596, 4104, 13630, 493, 6277, 22325, 16463, 3604, 5330, 19803, 20409, 15555, 10011, 8108, 514, 13864, 10390, 9501, 10537, 5018, 21033, 2403, 25130, 23331, 14959, 13416, 2782, 25307, 10495, 6644, 11133, 13303, 17700, 5961, 22604, 6314, 2633, 24046, 15635, 6259, 22103, 16249, 13299, 11347, 9180, 1969, 4303, 21885, 16411, 6473, 1573, 8404, 7047, 17950, 14896, 10720, 12429, 18160, 14085, 8430, 8017, 24832, 10914, 19113, 9450, 13400, 22886, 12222, 4231, 13392, 16475, 22540, 19248, 10564, 9110, 3566, 13509, 13682, 24503, 12072, 22828, 1496, 16565, 6886, 8157, 11810, 1024, 9830, 13594, 4542, 14356, 2019, 2144, 1892, 21625, 922, 22949, 19332, 3767, 5045, 1526, 5326, 9938, 10022, 18421, 5567, 2832, 21284, 2736, 5727, 20628, 19429, 9539, 14655, 14602, 16960, 14329, 15963, 20330, 1806, 1201, 18477, 10431, 5035, 20930, 22243, 22438, 16344, 24009, 2436, 12090, 23977, 18230, 9293, 12781, 9361, 6739, 12417, 21060, 23054, 18061, 453, 24796, 10725, 14313, 19234, 2230, 19789, 24208, 10224, 22235, 24025, 2145, 7433, 270, 24766, 12931, 4933, 22244, 22237, 5146, 2188, 3804, 23902, 23852, 25124, 20028, 19708, 7440, 19760, 5996, 20000, 22567, 14179, 20460, 19572, 10700, 22393, 22366, 1778, 18346, 24083, 7493, 12913, 21728, 10208, 2610, 8863, 17759, 13930, 3840, 931, 13613, 19610, 5040, 499, 19966, 16898, 13573, 23605, 15113, 18988, 25463, 22489, 22411, 827, 13084, 23053, 7036, 16987, 923, 21433, 5941, 20163, 10715, 5698, 4004, 339, 20145, 19559, 17896, 15092, 18617, 18603, 17421, 8896, 8973, 1037, 8764, 9697, 11317, 5288, 8207, 18745, 1464, 5136, 23417, 10940, 19900, 18749, 22740, 3497, 2644, 3501, 14791, 23579, 3831, 24184, 8617, 22519, 3121, 20316, 11873, 16022, 23685, 18523, 9261, 14519, 17511, 10640, 9752, 4712, 5162, 333, 12716, 7111, 7695, 25471, 15401, 10797, 24735, 15561, 20530, 19792, 2102, 12793, 18248, 5090, 23586, 7284, 639, 19834, 10465, 18687, 16593, 16020, 11617, 23042, 16244, 12359, 3757, 63, 17564, 23928, 9998, 11386, 7674, 16806, 5655, 2287, 3141, 4707, 21090, 15477, 10096, 21105, 17095, 10, 1884, 184, 8742, 19197, 10813, 20809, 18393, 13179, 836, 15628, 5037, 10263, 19831, 20845, 16165, 3742, 24474, 7311, 22433, 17266, 4940, 1192, 22973, 13094, 22082, 21283, 6178, 8433, 7712, 20637, 5917, 21969, 18409, 6256, 12776, 5901, 6872, 8304, 8386, 21762, 6305, 12141, 9868, 2545, 2777, 7273, 22176, 10838, 5471, 21417, 6987, 14255, 9891, 3568, 24872, 11580, 11692, 13698, 15147, 3247, 8045, 319, 14598, 15890, 22713, 21667, 3815, 9476, 17355, 16786, 15505, 10090, 11359, 15403, 5888, 17757, 13219, 22552, 3197, 19023, 21040, 7402, 4929, 23558, 7477, 15615, 17382, 12597, 5142, 4547, 23603, 21843, 6361, 13321, 21627, 5776, 24769, 18725, 7985, 22648, 19095, 12402, 16584, 2351, 6317, 5345, 10185, 2983, 18308, 1857, 18301, 5190, 15935, 7356, 14575, 17656, 1428, 1531, 722, 23810, 12002, 16256 ]
reddit_dump_-DraconisImperium-
[ [ "No really though, that's a great point about certain things not getting the upvotes. I think I'm just sensitive about the issue because I know how frustrating it is to work hard to make something special and to not see any positive feedback or recognition for it. Must be an artist thing, haha\n\nAnd yeah, I knew that if I started a new streetwear forum that it would be better than what was going on over there as far as quality control and community, but I've been quite amazed at how well everyone has been doing as far what people are helping to build here. This is the most concentrated support I've even seen between brand owners regarding constructive criticism and community, and I'm really proud of everyone here. This place has already far exceeded my own expectations in that regard, and I'm really going to try my best to make sure that sense of community doesn't get diluted as we grow. You've been a great member here yourself, and thank you for that.", "336" ], [ "This is your best post yet, and it's nice to see you improve the quality of what you're offering in the forum to this level. See how this post has a much more favorable response in upvotes than the previous ones? People respond to that quality and refinement, and better photos put your brand in a more favorable light.\n\nThis post works out great: you've put forth a few of your best products with much better pictures, and it feels real and even tells a bit of a story that's far more welcoming for your brand. These are two interesting pieces, but I would definitely say that the sweatshirt conveys the true message much better with the \"Hearts Up, Guns Down\" tagline to keep it clear. I can't wait to see the new pieces you're working on for the brand, and thanks for your efforts.", "459" ], [ "Now *this* is the type of streetwear brand aesthetic that I can really feel. I love the look of these pieces, and the single sleeve art layout is simply divine. I don't want to fanboy too much because it's unseemly, but this hits that 'high art' sweet spot for me that I can't help but be drawn in by, haha\n\nI'm counting on you to stick the landing on the layout of your website when it finally opens up, so keep up that quality and overall branding for sure! Thanks again for becoming a member here, and I can't wait to see where this brand goes.", "883" ], [ "It's interesting, because I'm now wondering how much the amount of people in a forum affects how strong of a sense of community can be maintained as it grows. \n\nSure, It's somewhat easy to recognize and support people here now while we're small, but what happens when we get to 500 members, or even 2,500? Can a strong sense of community be maintained as the system gets drastically more complex and more difficult to guide? Food for thought.", "647" ], [ "That was an awesome and informative read; you're really good at that and you've made some really great points here.\n\nAnd I've definitely heard that moderation isn't the greatest experience for some people, to put it lightly, but I can say for now that it's been pretty incredible for me so far. I know that moderation without a doubt is easier with a smaller and more tightly focused community, so my real problems are going to be somewhere down the line, haha", "459" ], [ "Welcome aboard, and thanks for becoming a new member! This is one of those graphics that I literally want to kick myself in the ass for for not coming up with it first, haha. That's really clever and inventive, and it's awesome to see something interesting and new done with a timeworn classic.\n\nAnd talk about a great website; very rare that I get a sense of fun engagement with a site or that I check out every page to see what's what at this point, so very nice work on that as well.", "883" ], [ "Now this right here is exactly what I'm talking about, and everyone listen up close. People who know what real streetwear is all about and know the history will literally *feel* this graphic, while people who aren't studied on streetwear will look on in ignorance, not even coming close to understanding what's going on here.\n\nLogo flipping is an absolutely critical part of streetwear culture. It's not theft, it's cleverness and a celebration of those brands, making them new with a synergy and power that a board room focus group could only dream of. Adidas is cool and all, but it ain't *this* fucking cool, because *this is street*.\n\nThe fact of taking the Adidas logo and making it a weed leaf is cool, humorous and head-turning, and things like that will always be cool, humorous and head-turning. And haters take note: while you're all scoffing from the sidelines, designs like this can make serious stacks to get a startup going: Supreme did it, The Hundreds did it, Crooks and all manner of great brands did it. Even Obey did it by flipping Andre the Giant, so learn your streetwear history before you open your mouth on the fucking subject. Great work my man, and keep this shit coming. Glad to have you on board.", "179" ], [ "I would say that if it's not for you, it's not for you, so no convincing necessary, haha. Sure, of course the Adidas weed logo has been used a lot before, but at the end of the day, we're in the streetwear *business*. We're designers, so we may get jaded when seeing certain things, but there's a hell of a lot of people growing up or who haven't seen this or actually bought one before, and BOOM, copped.\n\nThere's a balance to be considered between art and commerce, and if making another weed Adidas logo flip means keeping the lights on for another month, feeding your family or spreading the reach of your brand to build capital so you can afford to take bigger creative risks later, why not?", "618" ], [ "Very cool style, with beautifully minimalistic and timeless pieces across your whole collection. I really love the added synergy of motorsports culture to your brand, which is revealed in an excellent and engaging manner on your Instagram page and website. That's the sort of thing that elevates this brand to *true* streetwear.\n\nThanks so much for joining our community, and we're happy to have you as a member.", "459" ], [ "Great question, and that's a real concern that I've pondered and had quite a few arguments with others with myself, haha. There's sort of a problem with 'purity' in art, where the creative type often believes that something is lessened in some way once there's a concern for commerce of any sort. There's also a reason why most artists are starving artists as well.\n\nI tend to look at it in a harsher light: *business is business*, and whether you're trying to sell a painting or a streetwear t-shirt, there's really no sense in not taking the market into account at all, because the market has the final say at the end of the day. I'd say it's a smart idea to design with creativity and freedom in mind of course, but temper it with certain real world concerns and proven wants in commerce. It also depends on how large of a target market you're after.", "889" ], [ "Thanks for joining up as a new member, and welcome aboard. That name and those various logo designs are actually really cool. The main white or red logos give me a heavy industrial or machinery vibe, kind of like the Nine Inch Nails logo, and that's a huge plus.\n\nThe other two are really cool as well, with some fun twists on the theme. You really can do a hell of a lot with a logo like that with a brand and vary it up for different projects. There might be potential problems if there is any other streetwear brand or major company with that name though, so I hope you looked into that online. Also, it might be hard to reach the first page on Google with a word for a brand name like that, which is also something to consider. But all in all, I definitely really like this work.", "484" ], [ "I work on my own brand full time right now, but what I did was plan it and work on it over a *long* period of time while I worked full time for someone else, basically using bits of free time here and there to design and come up with ideas. Once I came up with my brand name and logo, and an idea book of about 100 rough ideas and a few actual layouts I was really happy with, I knew I was ready so I had things that I produced and sold in small numbers on the side for the brand.\n\nOnce you are selling enough on the side, there's a certain point where you can see that it will just make sense to go all in on the brand and leave the job and devote yourself full time to it. You just have to be *really* sure when that time is, but also be dedicated enough to find the time to build up your brand before you leave. Also, in all honesty, many startup brands simply just aren't good enough to get the attention and sales from others for the owner to go all in full time, but that's a whole other story, haha", "460" ], [ "On the contrary I'm actually quite intelligent, and I've been around long enough to know that you REALLY hate yourself if you go around saying things online to others like you do. It's just a fact of life that you can't help but put out there what you really are deep down inside, and if you're putting hate out there it's because you really hate yourself. Takes a lot to get over that.", "633" ], [ "Thanks for the support. I think it's great if you can do cut and sew, but there are also a lot of problems with that field as well and it too is now a highly flooded market just the same.\n\nSure, you can differentiate from other brands by making a product that no one else has like your own hoody to your own specifications, but you *still* have to market it and get the word out just the same, and cut and sew is no guarantee of success.", "696" ], [ "Don't get me wrong... I do understand the appeal and exclusivity of cut and sew, but blanks have come a *long* way since the earlier days and they might not be as limited as you might think. It also actually depends on more of what you're after: since I'm an artist and more into the art and design part of running the brand, I honestly just don't want to spend time on redesigning something like a sweatshirt when it is already done by a dozen existing companies far better than I could ever hope to do.\n\nPlus, unless someone is reinventing the wheel or something and producing something in clothing never seen before, a hoody is *still* a hoody, so what's really the big deal about making your own? Am I missing something?", "889" ], [ "Well, you DEFINITELY wouldn't be interested in this particular game, because it is literally the scariest game of all time, haha. Seriously, I'm pretty brave all things considered, but I actually had to retrain my brain in order to play it all the way through and not just panic or quit. It seriously feels like you're actually there in the movie, fighting for your life against an unstoppable monster stalking you through an entire colony ship.", "22" ], [ "Use the discount code DRAGON at the checkout to receive an additional 25% off on top of our already low prices, and we're now offering free shipping in the U.S only.\n\nAlso, give us a follow on Instagram to be the very first to know about the three new upcoming drops in mid-January, and later an incredible collaboration with Aaron Riddle Tattoos. Stay tuned!\n\n[_URL_2_](_URL_2_/)\n\n[_URL_0_](_URL_1_)\n\n^(Imperial Classics is based in the United States and ships to the U.S. only, with free shipping on all orders.)", "118" ], [ "Truth be told, that is a *lot* of inventory for a new unproven startup, and that sounds like way too much stock if you haven't already been marketing with a lot of people already knowing about the brand.\n\nIs your Instagram account set up yet? How many followers do you have? If you have no serious interest yet, not even in the streetwear startup forum, then with those numbers you're basically setting yourself up for a high supply/low demand situation, which can potentially end in disaster.\n\nSeriously, I just launched my own brand online a month ago and I'm working full time for myself, but 90% of my time is devoted to marketing and networking to get the word out to others and generate sales. I wouldn't recommend getting any more than 24 pieces of each specific design to start with; you can *always* restock if things blow out, and that way you won't end up sitting on a ton of unsold products if the interest just isn't there.", "460" ], [ "*This is great. Yes I haven’t really built up much hype on my actual brands IG besides my personal.*\n\nI'm glad we talked, because I think I just saved you from a few major mistakes, haha. If you're talking big numbers in stock like you are, most people wouldn't jump into the game without five hundred to a thousand *real* followers with actual interest before they did that. \n\n*I don’t have any product on hand yet to even make any promotional content yet so I’m just sitting on my ass.*\n\nThat's exactly why you want to start with no more than 24 of each piece; it's like a 'test order' so you have something to promote for the brand, something to do photoshoots with, and also market without being in too deep financially. The smaller you start in overhead for your business, the quicker you can work your way to solvency and eventually profitability. Also, you can start your Instagram account for your brand right now by showing any early concepts and design work that you have; any interest you can build at all, even just a dozen or two followers, is miles better than nothing at all. You can always delete the early things and start over once you have the final pieces.\n\n*I don’t even plan on restocking in order to create scarcity and value for my pieces.*\n\nMajor, *major* mistake to think that way right out of the gate. It might be somewhat harsh to hear, but no one in the world will care about scarcity for your brand until you start hitting major numbers and the stock is practically selling itself. Don't limit yourself while you're small, because you're *already* limited by not being Supreme or Nike. The guy that runs Steady Hands just wrote a major piece on this the other day. [_URL_0_](_URL_1_)\n\n*I will definitely take that advice and make a more limited release. I just don’t want to run out of inventory too quickly but that’s just me being hopeful.*\n\nThere's one serious pattern I see over and over again with many startup brands: *everyone* thinks they're going to be a hit right out of the gate. What they don't realize is that they haven't done the research enough to know that having an outright hit on the very first collection is like winning the lottery at this point, because it's a flooded market and most brands just get buried in the competition. The only way out of that is to differentiate your brand in the marketplace in any way possible, offer the best possible products that you can at the time, and market your ass off six to eight hours a day *and like it*. No lie, the marketing aspect is what stops most new brands right in their tracks, because most often they'll have no idea the they have to do *actual work* once the t-shirts don't sell themselves, haha\n\n*Can I ask how much inventory you keep for your brand? How much do you spend on marketing? Do you do paid promotions on IG or FB?*\n\nI make it a habit to never tell someone to do what I wouldn't do exactly for my own brand. I started off just like I told you, with around 24 pieces of each design, but I then as I started to sell through a few things I restocked the bigger sellers in bigger numbers before they sold out to keep sales going. I don't spend a dime on marketing or do any paid promotions or anything, because I'm sort of old school in that I believe in slow growth and stability, because I'm in this for the long haul.", "460" ], [ "Perhaps consider it this way: your potential brand is like a whole pie starting at 100%. Anything and everything you give to someone else to do will take away from that pie, which is your potential profits and even control. As a brand owner, you will need all of the experience you can get in every aspect of your brand.\n\nTherefore, if you don't do absolutely everything yourself, your cut of the brand gets smaller and smaller over time. I would suggest to learn graphic design through a basic program like Adobe Photoshop and do everything yourself.", "460" ], [ "Announcing the arrival of the newest member and the historic first model of the Imperial Classics collective, <PERSON>. She's cool and beautiful, creative and dangerous... just like our brand, there's no telling what she'll do next, so you would do well not to sleep on her or her skills as she's on the rise.\n\nRepresenting New York and soon to start killing fashion draped in the black and silver, check out the origins of her work and style on Instagram at [@silverwhoo](_URL_0_) and watch our Silver Treasure shine.\n\nInstagram: _URL_1_", "25" ], [ "I don't know much about DTG, but $22 a shirt sounds *outrageously* exorbitant. That might be because your print runs are really low and DTG can take a lot of time, but still, that's highway robbery to charge a price for printing for close to what the final retail price should be.\n\nThere wouldn't be any point to being in business if you couldn't even make a profit on your products, so I would try to cut down on the colors and go with screen printing if you could.", "583" ], [ "It was fucked up. Here we all are, just sorting by new, and BAM, total dick pic selfie of a dude sitting on the toilet! I'm a dude, and even *I* felt violated so now I know how it feels when dudes send dick pics unsolicited to girls, lmao\n\nHe was obviously mentally ill or something, but he was pissed and ranting about how posts from r/teenagers showed up in his feed on Reddit, and he wanted to be banned by the mods but they wouldn't do it. So he did that intentionally to get banned.", "480" ], [ "Yeah, you *can* wear it, but I still wouldn't want to. It seems like there's still an association with him, almost like popularizing him or capitalizing off of something terrible? Tricky business there.\n\nBack when 9/11 happened, some people tried to make items like trash cans and t-shirts with <PERSON> image crossed out on it, but they were huge flops because no one wanted anything to do with it.", "936" ], [ "I think yours is one of the best brands in here, hands down. Your artwork and designs have a really awesome and interesting retro look that I love, so it makes a lot of sense that you're getting sales and doing well.\n\nSo many people just come in the sub to quickly promote and bounce, and then wonder why their posts don't get any engagement or upvotes, so I think it's really cool of you to upload videos like this to help others out.", "460" ], [ "My sentiments exactly, haha. Back then was just a different time period where hip hop had more impact and relevance. The 80's and early to mid 90's were an awesome time where hip hop dominated and set the tone for nearly everything else, and that was rap's golden age.\n\nDon't get me wrong, <PERSON> was obviously one of the greatest rappers of all time, but nearly everything from that point forward just imitated him to death. It kind of sucks that he was so great and influential that it just stopped any kind of innovation or uniqueness overall in rap, but I guess that everything has it's time.", "419" ], [ "I'll tell you one thing, as a brand owner myself, there's a hell of a lot of difference between an upvote and an a*ctual order*, haha. None of my posts are really popular in here, but that's not the biggest concern for me because I work full time for myself and have other marketing avenues and strategies that generate sales.\n\nI think a lot of people just upvote something that's weird or different because it catches the attention, but there's not much chance of them buying or wearing something like that in regular life.", "618" ], [ "Look at the objective evidence: you could have printed any image you wanted on a t-shirt, literally *anything*, and you chose <PERSON>. Why not run <PERSON> on a shirt next, or Chairman <PERSON>? haha\n\nWhatever dude; starting off with moves like that isn't a good indicator of any kind of future for you, so have fun with that fucked up direction. You're deliberately trying to trigger people and be edgy, and brands like that with nothing to back them up are a dime a dozen.", "179" ], [ "Hopeful new brand owners can get distracted by a lot, but the most critical thing to realize when first starting up is that you simply *must* design the best t-shirts and clothing that you possibly can. If it doesn't turn heads, it's not going to generate sales, period. If you can make something that looks better than many other brands, the rest can sort of take care of itself if you make the right moves as you go along.\n\nAlmost anyone should be able to scrape together a few hundred bucks or use a credit card to start up small, and if their lineup is good enough, then they should also have the basic business knowledge to know to roll the money they generate back into the business. If the brand is actually any good and you put real effort into your marketing, it shouldn't be long until you generate enough profit to pay yourself and eventually work for yourself.", "460" ], [ "For sure, the upvotes are great if you can get them, and just like anything else in marketing I think it probably works like a 5 to 10% order rate for the bigger posts, as in get 100 upvotes, you probably can get 5 to 10 orders.\n\nAnd the marketing is definitely where it's at; I was fortunate enough to work in the imprinted apparel industry for a lot of years, so along with the experience that gave me a lot of connections and people that knew me personally that were more than happy to support me and my move into starting my brand. I also try to make personal connections with my clientele, and that personal touch behind the scenes seems to make all of the difference these days.", "460" ], [ "Use the discount code DRAGON at the checkout to receive an additional 25% off on our already low prices, which is a great deal on top of our new free shipping in the U.S only.\n\nAlso, give us a follow on Instagram to be the very first to know about the new upcoming drops in mid-January, including an incredible collaboration with Aaron Riddle Tattoos, and the ThiccBoi Heavyweight collab coming up in the spring!\n\n[_URL_0_](_URL_0_)\n\n_URL_1_", "118" ], [ "The single most important thing I can tell you about starting out is this: *do your research on the field first*. I don't know if it's due to the internet destroying everyone's attention spans or what, but the current trend seems to be for people to just jump into the field by printing up t-shirts without even knowing a single thing about what makes a successful streetwear brand or how to run a business. Taking the path of least resistance is almost guaranteed failure, and the failure rate of small business in general is 80% after five years.\n\nTo do proper research, what you want to do is take your top three favorite streetwear brands, and study everything about them that you can find online. Study their websites and Instagram pages, and take actual notes on what makes them work, and most importantly, *why* you think they do what they do and are successful.\n\nIf you do that and take it seriously, certain patterns are going to start to stand out to you, and you should start to see why certain brands have such appeal and why they work. Apply those same principles to your own brand once you see them, and don't start up until you do. The streetwear market is absolutely flooded and has been for years, and lack of knowing anything about the field before jumping in blind is definitely one of the biggest reasons why most startups fail.", "460" ], [ "Awesome comment and feedback, exactly what I was looking for. Thanks so much! To explain, the black and white theme is something that sets up the branding and overall mood for the collection, sort of like how Starbucks uses green and white for their logos and branding.\n\nThis comment is now in the running for 50% off on one single entire order if you are interested and you live in the United States.", "274" ], [ "*Works on both mobile and desktop flawlessly*.\n\nPerfect, and exactly what I was after. Would you believe that this was the first site I ever even attempted to design? haha\n\n*The designs are nice except for the... mm I guess boring colors (then again black and grey are what most people wear)*.\n\nYeah, I've been getting that more recently. Black and gray are the official brand colors, but I'm branching out soon to add some more color to spice things up next week. Stay tuned.\n\n*Product dimensions? Amazing. Every store needs that*.\n\nAwesome! I totally went out of my way to do that listing of the measurements for both Americans and international customers in the future, and it paid off nicely.\n\n*The information under MISSION and EMPIRE is interesting*.\n\nThat's great, and I'm so glad that at least a few people have bothered to read them, haha\n\n*Free shipping is cool, only to the US is not. Lol sorry Canadians, no samurai for you*.\n\nThe prices for shipping in the US are *exorbitant*, like they literally eat up the profits if a brand owner isn't totally careful! haha. And I'll be shipping to Canada within a few months, because that's where our second most attention comes from.\n\n*The prices are a bit high, especially for broke ass teenagers. 25 bucks for a shirt? Damn, I can find ones on sale for nine dollars*.\n\nTeenagers claim to be broke, but nearly everyone finds money to buy what they want to buy and the parents definitely help out with that. Look at how many of you guys keep up with the latest PS4 though whatever Sony drops, along with as many games as you guys continuously buy. No problems there with money! lmao. But that $25 for a shirt is with free shipping to the US, and it's printed on premium heavyweight super soft and thick cotton tees, not some garbage that's going to wear out on you after six washes like a lot of those $9 tees will.\n\nBut seriously, thanks so much for the in-depth feedback! You've given me a lot to consider and think about for the brand, and that has serious value to me.", "118" ], [ "For those who don't know, this is an actual streetwear *logo flip*, not a bootleg, and not anything that will end up with a cease and desist letter, haha. If you've done your research, this is the type thing that what many of your favorite top streetwear brands have done in streetwear history, from Crooks & Castles flipping the Versace Medusa logo for their own legendary brand, to The Hundreds flipping Lakers colors and designs in their products.\n\nEven Supreme ganked *their whole logo itself* from the artist <PERSON>, which more people should know. Not saying that I'm going to be on the level of any of those brands of course, but if you are actually studied on the subject of streetwear, then that type of knowledge will help you immensely on your own brand.", "484" ], [ "And whoever that cowardly downvoter is hating constantly from the sidelines, let them stand forth and air out their grievances publicly with me or my designs. I'm ready to talk about anything that I share or say to anyone in here on what I say or offer, so why so afraid to just say what's on your mind? Am I really so scary or is it that you really can't defend any of your points against me?\n\nSeriously, anyone who knows anything about art knows that the true enemy of any artist isn't hate, but silence and apathy; you're only fueling my fire to keep going *strong* with your negative attention, so thanks for your energy, and stay tuned for a lot of hot new drops coming out in the next few weeks, <PERSON>", "877" ], [ "Don't just jump into the field without doing *actual research* on the field. That's a recipe for disaster, and what they don't tell you is that the failure rate for small business in general is 80% after five years.\n\nThe streetwear market has been absolutely flooded for over a decade, so if you don't offer anything that 100,000 other brands aren't already offering or doing it better than they can do, then there's really no reason to jump in and waste your money. Work on your basic designs first, and then upload them here for feedback in the startup forum to see if anyone is interested or if they're any good.", "714" ], [ "Rotated the Jordan 'jumpan' logo about 135 degrees, added a really cool distressed font to match the tone and feel of the original, changed the word JORDAN to TRIPPN, and that was it. Short, simple and sweet, like the original work. Why does the simplest and most direct way seem to work the best for timeless and legendary designs, I wonder?\n\nIt's a design project I did for my new streetwear brand that I had a lot of fun doing, and it's really a love it or hate it sort of thing, and that tends to get a *lot* of attention on a brand. Thanks ahead of time for any feedback you want to leave.", "484" ], [ "To celebrate this entirely unexpected achievement, the first few people to use our special discount code right now will receive 50% off on their entire order.\n\nJust type in the discount code BLACK in all capital letters at the checkout when ordering. It's limited to only a few people, but it doesn't work hit me up with a DM and I'll send you a code for 25% off everything.\n\n[_URL_1_](_URL_0_)\n\n^(Imperial Classics is based in the United States and ships to the U.S. only.)", "118" ], [ "I print on Champion blanks, and I can assure you that it's completely and legally fine by them for you to print on them. I buy them directly from a wholesale supplier for that very purpose, and had my mascot screen printed on their performance hoodies which turned out fantastic.\n\nThe only real problem is that Champion is as expensive as hell, so it definitely eats into your margins as a smaller brand. I can be worth it for the attention that Champion gets from buyers, though.", "583" ], [ "Damn, I was just checking out what you posted lately and I'm glad that I caught this. A post like this is really rough, but there's a lesson here for you. There's the inside subjective world of our thoughts, hopes and dreams, and then there's the outside objective world of often harsh reality. Reality is fucking *concrete*, my man, and our dreams are ethereal, ever changing and soft.\n\nSo what I'm getting at is that there are going to be a *lot* of people who don't get your vision, and honestly a lot of people that won't give a damn even if you try to practically give your apparel away to them once you create it. You are an unknown quantity until you are proven objectively.\n\nThe reason that this all is is because everyone is seeing things from their *own* perspective, and everyone is going their own way. They might not care about your art, so how do you make them care? That's why I always try to point out to new startups that it is absolutely imperative to take the end consumer into account, and to temper some of your wildest and most creative impulses to what is actually possible and to what people objectively want to wear.", "889" ], [ "Love you too, man. Us seriously creative types have got to stick together! haha. You know, it's funny; when I was first starting up the earliest ideas for my brand and showing them to a few people in here a year or so back, I definitely wasn't getting a lot of love back for what I did.\n\nTo be honest, that got to me, but I just kept grinding over time and improving... getting tougher and just constantly learning and getting better. If you don't give up no matter what, this world *will* bend to your will and what you do will eventually become undeniable. I just look at everything now as a lesson, and things are finally happening for me and the brand. No one can stop that authenticity or real hustle, and I don't even see a lot of those same people who were negative on me before, so all of that negative energy just causes them to fall off by the wayside as I keep moving forward.", "4" ], [ "<PERSON>... I love that. I'm glad that you look at things the way you do and have such a vision, and you just seem so unstoppable, like a force of nature. I'm getting impatient though, and I want to see some final works or real world mock ups! I want to see that damn mission statement! You ain't holding' out on me, are you bro? haha", "459" ], [ "That's awesome, and I'm just teasing you my man, haha. I know you'll get whatever you can over to me when you can. On a side note, I'm planning a few new pieces right now to produce and have ready for my brand in about two weeks, hustle mode. I'll run some of the ideas by you in a DM and see what you think probably sometime later tomorrow.\n\nAnd did you get my DM about me shipping out your order? You're about to be pleasantly surprised when you get it.", "355" ], [ "You can do what you want to of course, but I'm not really sure why people want to jump immediately into cut and sew right off first thing. It's hard enough to start up a brand and run it well even printing on blanks, and cut and sew just adds a whole other dimension of difficulty to what you are trying to do.\n\nSee how no one jumped in to answer your question? That's because in part, you've chosen a far more difficult way to start things up, and people aren't going to work for you or do your research for you for free. It takes god mode hustle to start up a brand and then fight for market share, and if you are starting up a brand, you can never sleep. Personally, I would recommend doing it the standard way and printing on blanks and then eventually building up to cut and sew as the brand grows.", "583" ], [ "We've received a really amazing response from people during our first week online, and a lot of sizes from a few different pieces look like they are getting ready to sell out. I'm planning some big things for our next move of six new upcoming pieces in a few weeks, so we'd like to clear out our remaining inventory with a special deal.\n\nJust type in the discount code BLACK in all capital letters at the checkout when ordering. This is a one time use 50% per customer discount good for all products on our site, but it's limited to just a few people to reach checkout right now. As a head-up, bear in mind that the 50% off deal is good for your *entire order*, no matter how much you buy, so don't miss out.\n\n[_URL_1_](_URL_0_)\n\n^(Imperial Classics is based in the United States and ships to the U.S. only.)", "118" ], [ "Thank you. This is my absolute favorite piece from our new collection, and it's screen printed in silver shimmer ink onto a black crewneck sweatshirt. I only had a bad digital camera at the time, so this photo doesn't even come close to doing it justice.\n\nCheck out my other comment in this thread if you're interested in getting 50% off on your entire order right now from my brand.", "583" ], [ "I know my streetwear history, and I know how rare it is to see women start up their own streetwear brands and what they're up against. You've got women like <PERSON> making historic moves in graffiti and streetwear, and the legendary <PERSON> of Married To The Mob getting serious attention for even pissing off Supreme with her brand, haha. We all need to support and respect women whenever you show up.\n\nSo first off, the name 'Badluck Market' is flawless. Checking out your site, your pieces are really good, and that's an amazing start in art direction and design for a new brand. The pieces are all designed very well and get the message across, and that Smoke tee *kills*. Bravo on your art and taking the leap to step into the game.\n\nI'm new to the game myself because my brand just dropped its first collection online this week, but I also look out for other people and startup brands that catch my attention. I specialize in refining brand stories and website about pages, and also giving needed in-depth feedback for startup brand owners, so you guys let me know and I'll do whatever it is within my power to help you out at no cost.", "883" ], [ "Hey, that's really cool man, and thanks for the boost. I'll have to study your brand some more and see how you guys are doing it, because you're obviously already pulling some <PERSON>-level moves, haha\n\nWe're doing well and selling steady for just opening online three weeks ago in the middle of a pandemic, but starting up in this way will *definitely* keep us lean and mean. You guys got some big things planned for the Spring?", "460" ], [ "That sounds interesting, but from what I've personally seen, a lot of startups aren't looking for real advice. It almost seems like most people go it alone, and sort of come out with a design or two out of nowhere only looking for it to blow up, and then they drop out of business if it fails.\n\nPath of least resistance and all of that, haha. People who honestly like to learn and improve are a rare breed, but I would be down to help if anyone else shows up.", "575" ], [ "We just did a price overhaul on all Imperial Classics stock, and all prices on everything left have been reduced by 20 to 30% in most cases. We also just added free shipping to all orders in the United States over $50.00. We're literally trying to clear every single item out of stock in order to prepare for upcoming drops in the next few weeks.\n\nAnd to the first three people to use it, we're offering an additional 50% off on your entire order! Act fast and use the discount code BLACK at the checkout to get the deal, no limit. If the first discount code has run out, use the discount code DRAGON at the checkout to receive 25% off, limited to the first 25 people to use it.\n\nSite: [_URL_1_](_URL_1_/)\n\nInsta: [_URL_0_](_URL_2_)\n\n^(Imperial Classics is based in the United States and ships to the U.S. only)", "118" ], [ "Alright, this is probably going to be *really* rough to hear for you at this early stage, but I can't stand seeing someone struggle not knowing what to do next if they haven't done the research and don't know anything about the field.\n\nFirst, this market you are trying to get into is *absolutely flooded* with competition, and it's more cutthroat than you would imagine. Not only are your t-shirts going to be coming out from an unknown and unproven brand, they're going against every other awesome brand out there, and you're also going up against Nike. Why would someone pay you twenty or twenty five dollars when they could just as easily buy Nike, or any other cool brand in this forum? Which leads me to my second point...\n\nSecond, you better have an AWESOME idea for that t-shirt if you expect to even sell a dozen or two of them, and chances are if you're looking for help with the basics on Adobe Photoshop, there's no way to simply design a hit right out of the gate. Without serious study of art direction, design or training, that would literally be like winning the lottery. Also, we've all done our own research in order to get into this field as brand owners, and if you can't even figure out how to get blanks, then how are you going to handle all of the problems that come up with running a real business? You wouldn't believe the problems I faced in starting up and getting to where I am; I've had so many setbacks and problems happen that it would stop many people right in their tracks. You have to be strong and resourceful to be a brand owner, and figuring out how to get what you need is a rite of passage.\n\nThird, and this is something that most new potential startup brands don't have the capability of understanding: *t-shirts do not sell themselves.* Everyone thinks that at first for some reason, so they print up their order and then make a website, and then sit back waiting for the orders to roll in. *It literally does not work that way*, unless again, you win the startup lottery.\n\nFor example, I just started up my new brand online just over three weeks ago and I work full time for myself, and do you know what I do for about eight to ten hours each day? I'm constantly marketing and networking with people, mentoring other small brands, and doing literally anything I can to get the word out and build up my brand into something. And that's in addition to solving logistical and production problems, and designing and refining new pieces to keep the brand going, and making sure that my clientele is getting the best customer service possible. Yes, it is an actual job and the shirts will not sell themselves if no one knows who you are. You don't really get into this business to make money, at least not at first, because all profits get rolled back into the company to give it a chance to grow.\n\nNow if you're willing to do all of that, and you can withstand and outlast all of your competition, then, and only then, will you have the chance of developing your brand into something that generates money one day. Are you ready for all of that?", "460" ], [ "Thanks for the support, and I've got to say that I really like what you're doing with your brand and you have some really interesting and well-designed pieces. This is a field that people literally have no idea what they're really getting into when looking at it from the outside in, and it takes months upon months if not years of direct experience to start to get things right enough to make it viable for others to rep and support the brand.\n\nIf people just stopped jumping into the field blind and did even two or three days of serious research beforehand to know everything that they were up against, I *guarantee* that many wouldn't even bother in the first place, haha", "460" ], [ "If you didn't create it yourself and it isn't from something from over 75 years ago from someone long dead with no estate to come after you, then *everything* is an issue with copyright, haha. Anyone can sue you for any reason that they want to, and that's doubly so for for something not in the public domain and not explicitly meant for specific non-licensed use. It has to be from a site that literally says 'copyright free' to avoid any trouble whatsoever.\n\nThis being said, hardly anyone is going to sue anyone over selling two dozen shirts, so at best you'll probably get a cease and desist letter if you even get noticed in the first place. People don't tend to get directly sued unless they're making a LOT of money off of an unlicensed image, so you should be in the clear. But don't hold me to that, of course. ;\\]", "48" ], [ "No problem at all. Try doing a Google image search like \"royalty free images skulls\" or \"copyright free skulls\" and take your pick out of all of the images that come up. Bear in mind though that you still have to do the research on each specific image and go directly to the site it's coming from in order to know the rules. Sometimes there's still a fee of some sort involved, or some kind of fine print to watch out for.", "48" ], [ "I'm totally old school, so the last thing I would ever do is trust a POD service online to produce anything for me. I got lucky, because I worked in the imprinted apparel industry for quite a while and through my contacts I was able to find a master screen printer for my brand once I started up. Why do you want to use a print on demand service if you can do your own screen printing, if I can ask?", "583" ], [ "I like the one with the car a lot, and that gives me some pretty serious nostalgia vibes from old school video games. And when I check the analytics on my brand's Shopify account and see the globe, I think of the saying \"The World Is Yours\" every single time, lmao\n\nAnd just as a friendly heads up, you want to make it easy on people and provide a link to your site directly in the comments if you know how.", "883" ], [ "Instagram, it's *always* Instagram, haha. Other than that, there are people here on Reddit literally from all over the world that have seen my brand already, and I just continue to make sure that I'm here every single day talking to people and getting the word out slowly but surely about the brand. In my opinion, Reddit has just as much importance as Instagram right now if used in the right way.\n\nWe're in the U.S. and aren't shipping internationally yet until sometime next year, but I'm definitely building some strong early relationships with people that are excited about the brand nearby in Canada and even far away overseas in Australia, England, Spain and Germany so far.", "945" ], [ "You know, I don't know if this was intentional or not, but you guys have something of that old school streetwear vibe going on with your brand that I love, and that means that someone was doing their homework. Brands like Bloodbath 66th used to crush the game a lot in the same way a while back, and I like to see that authenticity kept alive.\n\nThat tiger camo, the straightforward logos and killer artwork, that all adds up to something really resonant and cool, and I can see where the clientele could go all in on that. Just keep hustling, man.", "887" ], [ "*What kind of experiences are you working to create?*\n\nI'm looking to bond with people over Imperial Classics and make real and lasting connections with them. It's not just about the clothes; there's a lot of prior history to streetwear and the culture, and I want people to get the experience of getting in on the ground floor as if the brand was the beginning of something like The Hundreds or Crooks & Castles.\n\n*How are you connecting with people?*\n\nOne at a time, and by really taking the time to listen to each of my supporters and my clientele to keep the dialogue going whenever I can. The brand might not be huge yet, but the silver lining is that no one in the world can touch me on what I can do in customer service right now, because I actually care and go out of my way for the people that are real supporters of the brand.\n\n*How are you building your business or operations to support your brand?*\n\nEverything gets rolled right back into the business to help it grow, so every order counts to us. We're now making serious connections with local influencers, which will definitely take the brand to the next level in awareness soon, and that's in addition to a major collab that's about to happen. Also, I'm already working for myself with my brand, and having that extra time makes all of the difference when running something serious.\n\n*What are your major accomplishments so far and what have they taught you?*\n\nI would say that the most major accomplishment was in getting a brand started with six products right out of the gate, and keeping things running smoothly enough with logistics and production from day one. It might not sound like a lot to start with, but once Murphy's law hits a new brand it can all seem insurmountable at times, haha. What it taught me was to not only expect anything, but to be able to handle any problem quickly and to not let it affect things for the brand.\n\n*What have been your major setbacks or roadblocks, and what have those taught you?*\n\nThis is a crucial one. The most major setback I faced was in being a member of that other streetwear startup forum. Here I was with a new brand, in total need of any real and unpaid marketing venue and a supportive community, but the people there just didn't seem to understand or care about me or my brand. I don't think I showed one thing over there that ever got more than three or four upvotes at best. With a roadblock like that that I knew wasn't right, because I knew what I was offering with my brand had real value, I just blasted right through it and started up my own damn forum, even in the middle of trying to run a brand, haha. What that all taught me is that you should never rely on anyone else in the world when it comes to your own fate, and if something isn't right for you, then *make it right* with what you bring to the table. Be the change you want to see in the world.\n\n*What kind of questions have been burning at the back of your mind that you think the community might be able to step in and advise on?*\n\nYeah, what do you guys want to see the most in the future from Imperial Classics as far as art direction and products, so you all can help me design my next big hit! haha", "460" ], [ "*I suppose one question I have is what have other, more experienced, brands done when there is a lull in work.*\n\nI knew that there would be a potential for a lull in work after starting up, so I literally don't allow that to happen, haha. I would say that I'm working around twelve hours a day most days if I count everything, but every time there's a lull in anything I simply move right over to another task immediately... so if I'm not packing orders then I'm marketing, and if I'm not marketing I'm working on the forum, and if I'm not working on the forum then I'm working on art and design.", "975" ], [ "I'm halfway teasing you, but in all honesty introspection is tough as hell for most people. To be able to say *I'm at fault or responsible for this and I need to improve and change* can be one of the hardest things someone can do, and it's really putting yourself out there to start a business in the first place.\n\nAnd that's even before I get to the point that some people just honestly aren't all that interested in actual success, because many are simply dabbling in streetwear as more of a creative side outlet. I've gotten into a lot of trouble and arguments with people before I could identify the difference.", "328" ], [ "The new black on black version of Skull Abstraction is coming this weekend, and is shown here modeled by the newest member of the Imperial Classics collective, SueYoungg\\_\n\nGive her a follow on Instagram so you can see her upcoming work in the black and silver, and make sure to follow us as well to stay up to date on the newest releases. \n\nInsta: [_URL_1_](_URL_2_)\n\nInsta: _URL_0_", "201" ], [ "I've been growing my brand organically over time, and I think I'm a bit old fashioned because I believe in slow and steady growth as opposed to blowing up overnight. I'm planning on running my brand over the long haul, and I've seen a few brands blow up too quickly and then suddenly go out of business or lose serious steam because they quickly become uncool or get the dreaded 'cringe' label.\n\nWhat's worked for me so far is something that I don't think a lot of brand owners realize: not every online platform works for every brand, and I think it's best to focus seriously on at least three marketing avenues if you can and play to your strengths. I can't stand FaceBook so I didn't bother there and Twitter has been terrible; there's too many people vying for position on those platforms and too many distractions for potential consumers anyway. For me Instagram and Reddit have worked out very well, and I'm keeping my third one a secret, haha", "460" ], [ "The print quality actually looks good to me, and I really like your logo and the mushroom design. It could just be that you aren't used to seeing your artwork actually printed out in person just yet, and take it from me, it can be very, *very* difficult to get the reality of what can be done to match your vision. Is that screen printing on the front and DTG on the back, and did you have it done locally or sourced out?", "583" ], [ "Acquiring new customers is definitely an art form. I would say that you have to do much, much more than marketing on Reddit, and you really need at least three continually sustained platforms to gain any serious traction. It's tough to come to terms with this, but we're all in a flooded market with absolutely no real need of any of our products, so it really becomes a game of two can market the best over the next hundred brands in the field.\n\nAnd what's worked for me so far is to make serious efforts towards making real bonds with potential customers, and taking the time wherever I can to just talk about the brand and what I do. Business is about trust, and the more someone gets to know you and the brand, then the more the trust develops over time and the more chance they have of supporting your brand.", "460" ], [ "What's not a good look either is reaching out to me as a moderator and making a bunch of demands about how I run things with my own forum, and then not even bothering to thank me when I made some changes *specifically* for you when you're the only person who brought up any grievances.\n\nWhat also isn't a good look is overstepping your bounds and gatekeeping in a place and not being welcoming to the guests that I've personally invited. This all is throwing up some pretty serious red flags about you and how you operate.", "621" ], [ "While this is specifically a streetwear brand forum, as the founder and moderator here I don't see any problem with your survey, because it is at least fashion related and you're looking for feedback in trying to start up a new brand. That's also a pretty impressive record for your other brand, so I'm sure that we can all benefit from hearing what you have to share as a member in the future here.\n\nThis being said, just bear in mind that we do expect participation and support from all of our contributing members on other people's posts and such where they can, because we're trying to build a strong sense of community and support as we go on.", "883" ] ]
302
[ 14183, 6330, 19672, 18724, 14184, 3272, 9036, 760, 22912, 23897, 18084, 11880, 12787, 12344, 11576, 20450, 18285, 4710, 24791, 4950, 3908, 6978, 15562, 12173, 7299, 239, 14718, 2900, 17075, 4425, 10656, 11601, 6839, 17605, 13169, 10816, 11068, 1209, 7661, 19364, 22470, 15958, 21895, 20287, 25177, 9969, 8459, 5954, 13424, 9481, 3658, 22375, 21098, 4279, 12062, 22304, 25220, 17619, 19824, 18314, 3995, 10956, 6806, 2511, 13639, 21810, 4583, 12642, 18138, 7774, 12469, 15341, 25326, 12207, 14312, 14297, 24485, 20401, 3425, 22875, 16352, 10740, 3508, 10923, 21010, 816, 3491, 10033, 567, 20152, 3670, 7412, 22650, 3536, 9656, 10668, 5413, 9715, 9011, 8565, 1089, 18480, 23297, 3336, 8175, 23851, 5085, 13970, 4943, 12383, 21813, 11719, 12710, 18148, 16196, 10307, 3819, 18351, 20946, 15450, 20981, 11366, 22966, 9935, 22756, 17647, 10901, 24495, 13810, 10450, 21472, 16264, 10021, 14838, 21376, 5226, 14907, 12098, 10587, 25011, 10457, 4112, 23886, 3657, 12779, 15149, 24032, 18869, 9679, 3259, 8070, 23083, 1732, 7679, 2732, 22518, 1842, 20681, 4325, 1749, 3650, 13135, 3554, 8560, 7467, 18655, 12702, 21094, 15380, 24190, 21422, 20297, 3639, 14639, 5579, 2514, 16480, 19073, 14271, 21996, 7012, 9404, 8014, 15376, 6849, 9676, 5645, 3578, 14309, 19222, 19744, 7742, 22969, 15335, 448, 17624, 14840, 8936, 15173, 4434, 17747, 341, 11291, 12514, 15064, 10477, 21939, 10115, 4184, 21223, 4298, 11846, 19098, 8270, 4287, 2752, 2203, 12994, 7156, 23948, 10275, 21438, 18649, 8073, 23671, 12474, 14903, 20735, 14621, 20721, 11531, 22267, 6845, 21215, 11502, 24271, 12961, 23104, 13280, 8708, 1262, 11665, 23320, 14831, 25413, 9518, 4991, 23386, 8583, 4517, 15101, 246, 1363, 13667, 23161, 21361, 10884, 21123, 3885, 4983, 15592, 13732, 17215, 734, 18748, 20593, 15796, 17965, 23996, 11410, 11678, 17405, 15771, 2771, 24938, 3440, 20268, 20079, 19479, 15306, 6562, 17278, 9549, 15052, 9205, 4713, 5810, 19140, 13257, 474, 5484, 9908, 6820, 12879, 2390, 17390, 6064, 12855, 12510, 21025, 8174, 8999, 23254, 20777, 15688, 20944, 12697, 23667, 9566, 18004, 10386, 21110, 6771, 2542, 2518, 15622, 13770, 15008, 4657, 6389, 11795, 25285, 24703, 4167, 902, 14426, 1119, 17539, 25311, 18339, 22480, 13925, 596, 17529, 1438, 10630, 7872, 6189, 8991, 14817, 19737, 17633, 3946, 3384, 19838, 19782, 2532, 8779, 6524, 20412, 19438, 22805, 23413, 9552, 4067, 11451, 4452, 17171, 10499, 18106, 16625, 13062, 22553, 25100, 2179, 12880, 20606, 3751, 24274, 11433, 10239, 2434, 16169, 22609, 14850, 17381, 11657, 13798, 3258, 3871, 15716, 3927, 4289, 11924, 9073, 13166, 6296, 4644, 16057, 15707, 10016, 16135, 6163, 2671, 5744, 6098, 6383, 6634, 8029, 3183, 17477, 13190, 15877, 1175, 17731, 19565, 21378, 2766, 19751, 4566, 24149, 4974, 20568, 20009, 7336, 12281, 23021, 452, 23800, 21774, 11823, 4008, 19409, 13895, 21730, 21095, 18873, 19899, 18144, 5833, 1023, 19669, 18319, 12529, 24798, 11405, 10466, 24122, 10130, 569, 6873, 14072, 2099, 11357, 17600, 19878, 3420, 10772, 22447, 22379, 23273, 1590, 938, 18950, 8693, 20760, 5333, 10210, 17598, 3739, 19041, 7087, 15170, 20255, 8201, 14537, 15733, 8373, 10001, 10400, 11308, 4233, 1422, 1270, 6794, 23881, 21888, 6616, 5535, 4941, 3879, 3086, 4178, 2057, 4387, 16920, 23994, 10412, 14483, 7825, 23366, 5341, 14992, 1182, 16858, 22133, 469, 7923, 19032 ]
reddit_dump_-Edgelord
[ [ "legit question for <PERSON> people.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nWhy do y'all base your perception of an ideal society off of a highly caricatured ideal you hold of ancient societies? Like people realize how gay Rome was right? and how it was having a civil war half the time? Also how Roman prided themselves on the fact that they their culture integrated aspects of other peoples cultures and vice versa?\n\n & #x200B;\n\nThey weren't just a bunch of philosophers sitting around. Although the philosophers that did exist were usually just rich assholes that got free government tendies for being rich and contributing nothing to society.", "240" ], [ "I actually think that if that's true it will be an interesting test of the idea that rightwing boomers peddle about American society deriving its morals from \"Christian values\" because everyone knows <PERSON> was the Roman Empires most prominent neoliberal. My money is on China not changing its value system at all, and just integrating Christianity into their authoritarianism and conveniently ignoring the parts of the bible that go against prevailing social beliefs.", "848" ], [ "you know, the primary reason the west wants to import people because of declining birthrates while east asia is resisting the idea is because east asian countries are willing to destroy their economy and power forever in the name of maintaining racial purity while the based neoliberal west actually understands economics and knows that our continued high living standards hinge on constant growth.", "79" ], [ "Rome had the opposite of contentment, the whole empire was a pyramid scheme that involved concentrating wealth from its majority rural population into a small urban elite whose patronage funded a infinitesimal middle class. \n\nAlso, I hope you understand that the only reason that bronze age civilizations might seem more based is because there is less documentation. For example, most Assyrian texts relate to taxes and the histories of the exploits of government officials. Chances are bronze age Assyria was also actually a place that most authrights would scoff at if not for a lack of documentation making them look like a perfect militarist society when they were actually a hodgepodge of waring tribes kept in a careful balance by a military dictator.\n\nWe can see in history that people were constantly pissed about their roles in society, practically every peasant revolt in the history of china c=boiled down to them wanting land reform. Merchants were always pissed about their place in society, along with practically every other group.\n\nbasically the order and unity that lots of authrights seem to find in historical societies is mostly an illusion created by ignorance of the subject. \n\nHell, most ancient civilizations didn't even really have unified cultures. Latin was the language of towns and cities, but the countryside in many parts of the empire did not speak Latin, or even consider themselves Roman. They had little culture to unity themselves around and had very conflicting ideas about how society should work.\n\nHistorically the longest lived cultures are the ones that are amorphous enough to allow themselves to change and accept foreign individuals. They expand, and gown in power, and inevitably dominate others. Rome and China both followed this model, which is how they build empires that were larger than they had any right to be (I realize I just debunked Roman cultural homogeneity but the major administrative centers were definitely hella Romanized. Older civilizations like Persia and Akkad also did this to great effect.\n\nI realize that I typed way more than you want to read, but just consider that a culture that can adapt to change is always going to come out on top of a culture that rejects modernity to live in its own fantastic delusion. This is why cultural openness will always win imo, the question for me is if America wants to win or not. For me the answer is an obvious yes.", "842" ], [ "nope, but money is a good measure of how many resources your society can command, meaning that any society with more manpower will have more power in general since it can field more resources mush a larger force of individuals at its disposal.\n\nOnce resources are collectivized we will still need manpower to ensure a constant improvement in standards of living, scientific advancement, and to ensure continued economic, cultural, and political power in the world. Reject stupid shit like culture and embrace the only truth: power. I love me some power.", "246" ], [ "Wait I’m not authright tho, I’m a lefty. My point is that cultural openness is good for a culture, and that cultures naturally assimilate into each other. I don’t believe in forcing my culture only anyone, I just want American culture to be open to other cultures because it is beneficial to our society. I don’t plan on legislating cultural openness or institutionalizing it, I’m content to be part of a broader movement that pushes for a freer culture.", "68" ], [ "I might be biased since I lived abroad in China, but I’ll take Chinese people (or any human being for that matter) any day, they are excellent people, smart, productive, and kind. Now Chinese culture has a lot of problematic beliefs but they are by no means universal, also a lot of my friends from China actually took up pretty progressive idea when exposed to them so I highly doubt that large amounts of immigration from China would cause us to become less tolerant unless our population antagonizes them. Especially considering that within a generation most of those values would disappear because their descendants would be raised in American culture.\n\nEverything I wrote also goes for Indians, after all, nothing is more based than accepting immigrants from your two biggest future rivals, thereby leeching manpower from them.", "848" ], [ "I don’t have a problem with philosophy just giving rich assholes government tendies.\n\nThe reason I argue that Rome was hella gay is because Christian Rome is generally not seen as the glory days of their empire. The transition to Christianity saw the beginning of the transition to proto-feudalism. Homosexuality in the Byzantine empire was repressed, but even in the dating days of the west it was still nominally legal. \n\nAnd it’s good that most of y’all don’t think this way, but fascists need to step up their game and stop larping.", "418" ], [ "I never said there wasn’t a cultural aspect to declining birth rates, just that less time in the office can have a positive effect. But yeah, you would just accept immigrants who have marketable skills (which is actually a massive pool of people), although I’m down with letting in a number of us skilled immigrants and providing them with education or training. The actual number of people who would benefit from that program depends on what the max number of people it would be profitable for is.", "113" ], [ "That’s not so much an issue with immigration as it is an issue with the thermodynamics of living organisms. We need to constantly exploit more energy to continue our growth, but our growth is what provides us with a higher standard of living and better science.\n\nEither way, the solution to old immigrants is more immigrants. That is, until we either have such a high degree of automation that manpower is no longer a factor or we cure aging or something.", "113" ], [ "Yeah Rome was wired since even though being gay was cool would were always expected to bear children.\n\nBut my comment was more addressed towards fascists (which does largely hinge on the belief in an idealized past), which I assume you aren’t. \n\nEither way traditionalism isn’t what I was trying to go after, although I disagree with it for other reasons.\n\nRandom question, do you think you can define what separates degenerate art and glorious art?", "240" ], [ "I didn't read your whole post so maybe you address this later on, but not being able to directly monetize new content doesnt mean you make no money off of it. For example, No Mans Sky has released every update for the past three years totally free, and the updates are big too. They are open about why they do it too, each update generates a big enough spike in sales to justify the investment that they make.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nBungie is still incentivized to make new strikes because for two reasons. first, community backlash. They know what players expect and want to avoid bad press where possible, as it makes the game less appealing to potential new players and can disengage old ones. They also know that adding new strikes will give the impression of a growing game, which will entice new potential players to get the game. Sure they will enjoy the strike for free, but their chances of liking it and then buying a dlc or two to get the full experience is high.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nNow yes, there is less of a push to make them since they are not as integral to pve as they were in Destiny 1. This is why they are have started adding old strikes back, its a compromise to keep adding strikes while also being able to put resources into other pve content.", "838" ], [ "I didn't read your whole post so I might get something wrong. I think your are right except about men wanting attention from women, I know a lot of guys like this and they truly just want some level of reassurance from either sex. Problem is they themselves are too scared to compliment others, in some cases because they are awkward and other times because they think they will come off as gay. Speaking as a dude, I have been accused of being gay for making totally platonic compliments to other men.\n\nSo basically men need compliments but I think toxic masculinity is preventing men from complimenting each other because apparently being emotionally uplifting people apparently isn't the thing manly men do.\n\nA lot of guys act like somehow women are to blend for toxic masculinity, but let's make it clear. Aside from maybe a few women with very uhh...tradinonal beliefs, the only thing stopping guys from complimenting each other is other guys.", "256" ], [ "rome didnt really \"civilize\" europe as much as people think, the local celts/gauls (honesty they are a made up ethnic group for the most part) were a fledgling urban society. They built oppidas, which ranged in size from small forts to modest cities. Their government, and technology were actually very similar to that of rome. \n\n & #x200B;\n\nThey key differences that cause us to view them as a society that lacked notable achievements were the following:\n\n & #x200B;\n\n1. they built all their shit with wood. Meaning that no matter how grand a structure they built, it would decay pretty fast, this means that their architectural heritage easily died out after they were conquered.\n2. they could write but for religious and cultural reasons kept it to an absolute minimum because they thought that writing degraded collective memory. Their writings are limited to contracts\n3. the celts and romans were similar enough in regards their values and societal organization that in spite of rebellions the celtic nobility pretty easy became complicit with roman rule, which is why france became so romanized.\n4. Romans were definitely better civil engineers owing to their centralization and use of stone in construction. Hence it is easy for their achievements to overshadow the celts even if the celts actually had similar but smaller scale works beforehand\n\nall of these things mean that the knowledge of their existence as a highly complex trading society with cities, governments, and regular washing of hands has been lost until recently. They werent some great empire, but they were a powerful and wealthy civilization, not quite as \"tribal\" as we often make them out to be, although certainly less urbanized than the Mediterranean world.", "842" ], [ "its probably an exaggeration, historical texts love to make the \"other guy\" look like a bunch of savages. Natives in north america didnt live in tipis (not really good in that environment), in new england long houses covered in bark were the mains residence iirc. keep in mind these were semi permanent structures. The vikings might have set of some basic defenses and rudimentary shelters within days, but it certainly wasn't a grand walled town erected within days.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nThroughout history people have lived in whatever suits their environment. which is why people have lived in brick houses for millennia in the middle east, while living in a brick house in europe would have been a sign of vast amounts of disposable income.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nalso warfare was common in that part of the world, so there was a need to defend settlements, but with their lifestyles urbanizations and heavy defenses were less useful since tribes often migrated (they weren't nomadic however, they were agricultural people).", "824" ], [ "my understanding is that domestication is influenced by social factors of the nearby humans and physiological factors in the animals. I believe I once read that some animals that are closely related to domesticated ones often lack that behavioral patters needed to become domesticated. That also says nothing about a need for it. Bison were plentiful, and easily hunted. Also I imagine that without ideas such as private property there was less of a need to fence off your bison from some else bison, making \"farming\" them pointless. Especially when its easy to let them feed themselves than it is to cut into your grain supply to feed your animals.", "431" ], [ "the inca were pretty much a bronze age society, but because the club dominated warfare it really doesnt show, since armor was largely cloth since weapons were often blunt. They did however had bronze working on par with pretty much any Sumerian civilization imo, but a lot of things were different so the bronze age looked very different in south america than it did in the middle east.", "842" ], [ "maybe? these inventions actually weren't as common in the old world as we think. Idk what factors contributed to their adoption, but the Byzantine Empire, the most advanced European power during the early middle ages lacked the wheelbarrow. Even when their neighbors had it. Somehow they were still more urbanized and population dense society than their neighbors. That leaves me inclined to think that there were environmental factors at play in the adoption of the wheelbarrow. Especially considering that the frequency of toys that relied upon wheels in the Americas shows us that they knew of the wheel beyond any shadow of a doubt.", "842" ], [ "oh dont get me wrong, in modern times celts are an ethnic group. but back in the day \"celt\" was a sort of blanket term used by the romans for people living in a very large area speaking similar languages, i dont think the celts actually saw themselves as a single ethnic group, there were some pretty big cultural differences between various groups.", "842" ], [ "i mean, they were technically bronze age societies so you arent wrong, but that doesnt really make the architecture less advanced. In terms of scale and engineering aztec temples could rival the works of ancient rome and greece. I also think its fair to say that incan fortifications were superior to medieval european ones (castles).", "842" ], [ "I would agree. \n\nI think to an extent its sort of like races in America. this way not be a good example, but most people back in the day came to America not identifying with a \"Race\" but Americans none the less categorized various people into races. So even if you were Japanese and felt like you had nothing to do with Chinese people the fact that everyone just sees you as \"asian\" ends up creating an asian identity and culture because society essentially forced into into a category. \n\nmaybe not a great example, but hopefully you get what I mean, its both a real ethnic group and to some extent forced upon those people.", "255" ], [ "bro I understand that as historians we tend to think that history only took place in Europe, but china and europe were basically it. Keep in mind that places like india, persia, the middle east, north africa, south asia, and japan existed. And again, they werent present in all of europe even (byzantine empire).\n\n & #x200B;\n\nIts really beside my point though, the adoption of the wheelbarrow is precipitated by economic or social factors more than technological ones. Given that several very densely populated regions of the world were in contacts with wheelbarrow-possessing societies but didnt seem to have a need to adopt them. Just as an example. I imagine part of the reason that byzantium never adopted it, is because their major agricultural regions were not flat, and a wheelbarrow provides less benefit when transporting good across mountainous or hilly terrain. The same idea can be applied to the inca empire, where wheeled vehicles were useless due to the topologically varied terrain.", "842" ], [ "my university's calculus 2 class is designed to require a lot of abstract reasoning on the student's part. I think I can remember one instance this semester where the procedure laid out in my textbook was all I needed to solve a problem. A lot of the time you have the ask your professor because unless you are better as reasoning than me, there will be something you were never told to do, but logically had to do first. Apparently only cal2 is our only calculus that does this, cal3 at my uni is quite easy apparently. Other courses like differential equations and linear algebra apparently require a lot reasoning as well.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nI imagine it depends on the university and who is in those classes, but for some reason calculus2 is weirdly hard at my university, which is interesting since many people from other places tell me that calculus 2 is the easiest calculus class", "832" ] ]
10
[ 3466, 25044, 23914, 24600, 21473, 16781, 3792, 5701, 25021, 19564, 24266, 20365, 15483, 14819, 3045, 9022, 5155, 25020, 9873, 13180, 4194, 20226, 2538, 21449, 6153, 2442, 24688, 16031, 20111, 4810, 1469, 5496, 13613, 21033, 715, 6028, 19206, 2708, 15842, 479, 313, 13557, 4839, 25523, 9915, 17701, 16300, 21852, 16495, 14640, 3844, 24130, 15963, 12834, 14972, 3410, 14750, 17433, 11758, 23663, 20409, 15826, 23462, 18395, 2074, 24552, 18575, 20261, 11810, 18263, 23805, 10838, 1456, 13520, 23651, 4216, 11476, 21023, 9151, 13126, 1113, 3691, 22489, 17373, 15098, 8537, 13822, 13509, 6670, 23082, 17253, 18767, 14635, 3677, 21544, 25154, 4203, 6425, 2783, 23761, 3390, 6310, 12847, 1633, 15223, 16902, 20415, 6693, 3077, 17759, 159, 24832, 20886, 4451, 22923, 20634, 20704, 7954, 9958, 8685, 13749, 22235, 16804, 7605, 17670, 6686, 13316, 12129, 1084, 14887, 4829, 21554, 1055, 7341, 13164, 5917, 13551, 25088, 8795, 24478, 7924, 5697, 15035, 21663, 24273, 20146, 16533, 10595, 19441, 9560, 3029, 9501, 5040, 7036, 12247, 11965, 15635, 5240, 5901, 21054, 8307, 14261, 10959, 849, 21275, 3787, 8077, 18355, 9313, 13323, 12062, 2875, 22065, 12669, 21003, 3421, 14270, 2145, 6642, 15477, 13835, 5958, 1700, 10495, 23054, 12317, 14896, 12726, 453, 4493, 7451, 11146, 2216, 3917, 12800, 15561, 11066, 21643, 15206, 13374, 21811, 3662, 15271, 22162, 5285, 7719, 4836, 7617, 1073, 8617, 2112, 14193, 19430, 8284, 9474, 8206, 4299, 11100, 7981, 286, 18725, 3719, 16067, 435, 16464, 1057, 24009, 10199, 12673, 5776, 17035, 6077, 148, 2993, 2349, 13581, 23836, 11513, 9643, 14814, 24627, 16727, 14863, 6704, 2144, 681, 7712, 13, 10079, 2131, 2447, 24534, 18737, 16513, 1126, 19760, 24365, 9627, 21064, 594, 16524, 926, 8248, 19592, 5345, 4389, 14844, 6730, 7516, 18991, 5415, 19807, 21183, 16963, 23458, 4800, 1112, 13104, 23762, 24337, 7422, 1301, 23172, 24228, 18523, 266, 22557, 160, 7047, 14267, 24868, 9298, 21269, 1491, 7076, 16913, 4848, 16521, 2635, 1969, 16497, 21036, 15890, 9465, 16313, 5326, 17746, 6652, 4593, 3015, 8483, 24925, 1044, 10333, 14821, 21738, 5835, 7050, 13561, 20911, 8540, 19078, 14801, 21941, 12846, 2461, 16247, 23351, 23113, 12267, 17527, 7227, 12216, 21958, 3568, 14455, 13209, 10022, 18992, 11056, 4367, 3510, 18040, 14111, 4262, 7645, 22892, 11712, 13625, 15766, 21669, 4613, 7204, 17092, 18266, 13288, 17209, 6569, 9253, 17094, 24854, 11865, 10918, 7947, 24046, 6141, 21849, 9180, 24481, 17024, 13219, 2686, 1668, 3177, 7810, 9310, 25307, 13682, 12005, 19113, 14246, 15603, 16990, 10791, 19549, 3142, 11737, 6851, 7356, 7002, 73, 17172, 6654, 21112, 7228, 8330, 10196, 16414, 24549, 14720, 18679, 2039, 5471, 9123, 14282, 5190, 2017, 2277, 14835, 218, 16871, 6438, 11496, 25327, 9743, 3083, 18745, 25170, 7695, 5116, 18136, 17026, 4368, 24366, 9041, 10790, 9328, 15509, 22821, 12705, 12325, 333, 3620, 25108, 6529, 20768, 21090, 11996, 22507, 4507, 1312, 4042, 7985, 742, 6608, 19218, 4918, 14602, 18244, 5118, 18754, 630, 15837, 14789, 13867, 18349, 24471, 10282, 11624, 6434, 10362, 6260, 3416, 10192, 16233, 7235, 19927, 3735, 12913, 12527, 17782, 4971, 4735, 2586, 16935, 6587, 10075, 1463, 5122, 13864, 3444, 1531, 23028, 3531, 5461, 25347, 22229, 3332, 23493, 13741, 23616, 15814, 1927, 3988, 270, 5264, 20437, 7660, 1416 ]
reddit_dump_-Equestris-
[ [ "It’s included in the annexation of Morea. The fact that bunch of villages decided to rebel doesn’t mean they regained freedom.\n\nFor a country to gain freedom their previous owners should sign/be forced to sign a Declaration of Independence. \n\nTherefore they were de facto independent and de jure under the Ottomans as they are part of Morea.\n\nThey can’t be on the map until they declare independence. You will see that North Iraqi Kurdistan is also functioning like a state but they are not on the map.\n\nWhile Karabakh is a republic again not on the map until previous owners sign a document declaring them free.\n\nEdit: Also Mani was indeed under the Despotate of Morea you can open a map and see it. _URL_0_", "26" ], [ "I agree while I can’t accept your argument as truth I can’t say mine is true 100% either.\n\nI don’t have any access of information to the Republic of Mani. I just assumed they were part of Morea because I have seen them depicted as such in every source I have ever seen in my life but more often than not history is more complicated than this.\n\nI’m interested in the matter but have nothing to do with history didn’t know about Mani being a republic before this but the moment I checked it in the map I knew that it was part of Morea but it’s just because everything about the region I consumed until now shows it as this. \n\nTo know otherwise we should have access to archives but they are not scanned and uploaded to the internet as far as I see at least I can’t find any information in online archives of Ottomans for those regions if it was a independent country or a rebellion and so far found information only for battles fought there. Maybe this is your job to make this more popular as you can search wider about it than anyone outside of Greece especially if you are local to the region.\n\nThank you for letting me learn one more thing about history independent or not just heard about it a hour ago and already read dozen of stuff about the place.\n\nI also don’t know why I’m upvoted not the case with my flair lol I guess the map above influences how people think ah how turn tables😂.", "26" ], [ "Well they don’t exactly get bored their logistic supply gets thinner and thinner even if they have endless resources and eventually they fall into a situation where they can’t get war supplies and food/water to their Army therefore they can’t maintain the occupation. Harsh terrain and bad wether just add up to this and make it disastrous in the case of Russia.", "381" ], [ "If we include islands closer to Asia as Asian then no a lot of Islands are closer to mainland Anatolia. If the map is going to cut of Asia it shouldn’t make exceptions including Cyprus. \n\nBut I don’t see why this should happen especially in case of Turkey most of the time as it won’t make the map size undesirable neither will Cyprus(which gets added and stretches the map either way).\n\nOf course this doesn’t apply for this map which is good this way as if they include Anatolia as well they will have to include Ottoman Africa and Spanish Africa making this impossible.", "26" ], [ "What do you mean 1776 is a EU4 time😂.\n\nActually the system of Vicky2 doesn’t require exactly commoners voting you can have group of elites deciding the ruling party etc. but electoral collage like systems were very popular especially in republics of Italy(and the short lived Italian republic). The French Republic etc. Are all included in EU period.\n\nDemocracy where landed commoners participate is actually not unheard of from the ancient times it’s not a new idea.", "773" ], [ "I’m pretty sure you become a vassal state a century later and a independent country almost century and a half later...\n\nPuppet-113 years after this map\n\nComplete independence-143 years after this map.\n\nNobody who lived during or born in 1765 ever saw an independent Bulgaria so I wouldn’t call it “few years later”. Otherwise enjoy independence komşu🤍💚❤️.", "773" ], [ "Try one better.\n\n<PERSON> got his revenge for Armenia playing the bad boy while using Azerbaijani lives. They happy they got occupied land back but they are still nothing but Russian puppets.\n\nAnyway anything that will break Caucasian countries away from Russia is for the best of all of them. They will be much better off alone and might not magically decide to start decades old conflicts again for land that was already promised in negotiations.\n\nI wonder when bunch of Russian families native to Karabakh are going to appear out of nowhere. Usually how it plays out.", "26" ], [ "I think you are having hard time understanding my comment. \n\nWhen you stop a conflict you started you shouldn’t expect to be declared as a hero. \n\nYou broke the vase now you expect to be cheered for gluing the pieces back together.\n\n<PERSON> gave the green light for this conflict it’s all he has been planning for since 2018 and if it’s not plain obvious by now I dunno what else to say. Does somebody seriously think Azerbaijan can declare a war without getting the thumbs up by <PERSON>?", "26" ], [ "<PERSON> might have just tried to get him a little joy with stupid stereotypes. Not everything everyone says is supposed to be offensive.\n\nConsidering one of the top comments with 21 upvotes right now is a joke about French people using perfumes instead of taking a bath... which is a stereotype at least century older than mine. \n\nAaaannnyway see ya.", "181" ], [ "When you go to the beach for a swim you see it as a “swim” it’s actually not supposed to be just swim.\n\nYou can spend this time thinking about important life issues or if you have a friend/family member take them to deep water just speak to each other away from everybody relaxed in the water. Had quite a lot of the most meaningful conversations in my life like this.\n\nTo enjoy swimming your mission in the water should be something other than swimming.", "4" ], [ "I might one day.\n\nI look like a genuine turk very dark hair and incredible moustache growth.\n\nLook my ancestors are Turks for sure I’m sure I have Greek ones and Arabs ones as well but I’m not from the North East so Armenians would be a stretch. But I agree never claimed people in Turkey are Turkic lol.", "26" ], [ "There was a French guy over here who mocked me for saying France is doing the worst in Europe.\n\nHe said there’s no problem if people get more infected now because “we learned how to treat them”.\n\nThere’s a photo of a bed on a rooftop...\nImagine if they treat you in a rooftop.\n\nSeriously fuck everyone in Germany and Italy who is making protests... while our older generations are dying coughing and sneezing in pain. I’m proud with my people and that their ignorance reached only so far and thankful for once that I live in a authoritarian state.", "519" ], [ "The fact that 24 planes won’t make much of a difference when your enemy has 2 times your combat jets even though they can be slightly more modern.\n\nThose 24 planes could be better than anything Turkey can bring in but the fact that Turkey can bring in two times more changes almost nothing especially on air dominance terms.\n\nConsidering to dominate the Aegean you need to dominate the sea as well.", "775" ], [ "Dude we getting that jet as long as <PERSON> is gone and we will keep having those S400 and our own jet. \n\nSure as well it wasn’t worth starting to produce drones we can never have the capability of USA and Israel for sure... right\n\nAlso the jet itself will be cheap af for us and we can produce hella more for the same money rather than keep buying F-16 and we will still need F-16 style aircraft even if there’s newer generation lol. \n\nYou are comparing aircraft like pokemon cards.", "775" ], [ "Dude it’s about air superiority over the Aegean we are having dispute about the territorial waters and some dog fights etc. Etc. It’s about who shows more power really not a war.\n\nWar is unthinkable lol😂 even if we win it won’t be worth it. I think we will dominate in land and hold fairly on air but even without any outside help Greece is quite mountainous very hard to invade and very easy to defend.\n\nNo matter who invades Turkey the case is the same.\n\nAll out war between capable nations is not really an option in the modern world it’s almost never worth it.", "26" ], [ "Firstly mate no.\n\n<PERSON> didn’t call himself Roman that would politically destroy the country. He is knows to be half Greek to lay claims to Constantinople though(by his father). He took the title “<PERSON>” which means “Ruler of The Romans”. That was because he was literally ruler of the Romans. <PERSON> is a little later title than his times instead he called himself a Sultan and later an Emperor(Kayser-I Rum).\n\nWhen you are at peace with a country that doesn’t exist does it count as “We lived in peace”. When you count the time where you occupied a certain nation as being in peace with them it’s literally dumb founding mate. Maybe people lived in peace but for centuries we lived in peace is probably the most unreasonable thing I heard so far today. \n\nJust like Germany and Mordor lived in peace for centuries right.\n\nAlso dunno what you think but where I live half the country hates Greece and Greeks view them as something less than themselves. Stop acting like nothing is wrong in our country or trying to show it off better than it is. Look around yourself and stop isolating yourself in circle jerks ask <PERSON> what he thinks and you might really learn the opinion of the dumb populous.\n\nGood day to you.", "240" ], [ "Man Gray Wolves are worse they are not even nationalist anymore. I loved them when they used to be shit now they are Erdogans dogs.\n\nLook at them they lost their cause they wanted some pan-turkism shit. I hate that idea from start and I hate nationalism but I can respect them. I even respect Nazi’s you know disliking and respecting are not things opposing each other but those idiots they are not wolves they are little chihuahuas.\n\nTo Europeans you shouldn’t be afraid of these dumbasses they don’t have a centralised control everybody is doing whatever they want and they certainly lost their cause they are more of Islamist now not pan-tengrist. They are just dogs.", "911" ], [ "<PERSON> was great cool figure but wrong times to take as an example.\n\nOttomans are not what we should aim or take as an example. Just let’s be good neighbours let’s try to trade with our neighbours instead of fucking Pakistan. Neighbours aren’t big enough to sustain good gains from trading make the neighbours better. \n\nEverything is remembered in this world. We could have helped Greece build a better economy and we could have made ourselves best trading partners but look what we did. \n\nTurkey could have been a Germany like country influencing country around itself a great deal. We became militarised shithole.", "26" ], [ "<PERSON> remove <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON>. Turkeys aim has never being expansionist not trying anything military.\n\n<PERSON> right now might be using it as expansionist idea but even our involvement in Cyprus was not expansionist. Turkey has been good old secular 1923-2003 with few bumps like <PERSON> and never looked into expending her territories. Whatever we were involved in we were completely righteous(Cyprus) unlike Syria right now.\n\nWe had a good run.\n\nI agree with you except Ataturk was not <PERSON> vol2. <PERSON> was great but he had a lot of more resources for the time and he is rather Ataturk Beta instead of the other way around.\n\nHe was also quite progressive for the time.", "26" ], [ "I think parts of Serbia have been under Hungarian rule and the whole country was owned by Ottoman Empire for couple of centuries at least. Albanians in the region is a lot of Ottoman work for example and the Muslims too along with Southern Bulgaria and Bosnia this is one of the regions we saw worthy of assimilating although absolutely all of them failed and eventually the idea was abandoned. Who would know that it will cause so much trouble decades later.\n\nAs for Kosovo. Our bloodiest battle with Serbia was fought near Pristina during the 14th century and I do believe it’s rightful Serbian land.\n\nNo need for second Albanian country in The Balkans.", "26" ], [ "Maybe instead of doing it out of spite they should have continued working normally. Publishing offensive or not offensive stuff just like normally on daily and don’t give a fuck about what happens. The whole company right now because somehow the defender of European values while it certainly can’t hold up to that title.\n\nWhen a joke is good and it’s offensive on the way it’s a good joke. When the joke is offensive and this is what’s supposed to make it funny I dunno free speech and all but it’s a shitty joke I don’t want to see so much around.", "339" ], [ "Greece is certainly not the frontline. Mainland Greece was not effected at all nothing like Izmir. \n\nOther than that France can just not help anybody because there’s no need for help from anybody else anymore neither Greece or Turkey but they should receive a formal thank you from both countries.\n\nBoth countries right now are working together and a lot of countries sent help so far biggest commitment is from Israel as far as I’m aware.", "26" ], [ "It won’t.\n\nNot that I’m sure about the morals of Azerbeijan here but rather I don’t believe it will be profitable or even possible to go into much more tougher terrain of Armenia after NK which is also quite rough.\n\nI guess it will be very hard to try invade Armenia without ton of casualties and chances are you will be unsuccessful.", "26" ], [ "There are a lot of old dedes making their Raki at home in the villages.\n\nIt’s completely legal to brew any kind of alcohol for personal use. So I guess it’s quite high especially recently and popular with old people who can’t afford this kind of abnormal prices.\n\nErdogans been spitting on people’s face for couple of years now but some people keep respecting this jerk.", "26" ], [ "ISTANBUL (AP) — Two top Turkish officials who work closely with Turkey’s president have tweeted that they tested positive for the coronavirus.\n\nPresident <PERSON>’s spokesman, <PERSON>, said Saturday that he had light COVID-19 symptoms and was nearing the end of treatment.\n\nInterior Minister <PERSON> said he, his wife and daughter all tested positive after feeling unwell on Monday. They are being treated in a hospital, and “Thankfully we are a bit better,” he said.\n\n<PERSON> was criticized in April for announcing Turkey’s first weekend-long coronavirus lockdown just two hours before it went into effect, leading to scenes of chaos at markets. The president did not accept his resignation.\n\nTurkish Health Minister <PERSON> on Saturday reported 75 new deaths from COVID-19 and 2,213 new confirmed cases. The country’s death toll in the pandemic now stands at 10,252.", "266" ], [ "Saw a lot of ranking putting Plovdiv as oldest city but Athens(Attica) is both inhabited longer and consider a city before at least a millennia before Plovdiv.\n\nArgos is considered even older but it has been shifting back and forth a lot(city and village) and it is not known when it was a city for the first time.\n\nCadiz in Andalusia was also founded at least 600 years before Plovdiv.\n\nAt least according to [Wikipedia](_URL_0_) and not some ranking done by a random magazine. Still pretty beautiful and important city though and my favorite in Bulgaria.\n\nProbably we will never know the oldest city in Europe but it’s not Plovdiv because we already know older cities and older inhabited regions etc.", "146" ], [ "Yeah of course it doesn’t but you say he can destroy humanity as a single person and closest thing I can think of is <PERSON>. I know people underestimated the mustache guy too but I don’t think <PERSON> can pull anything close to that.\n\nIf he is destroying something he is destroying my country.\n\nAlso if we gonna have German miracle style economy after the war😂. I’m in", "533" ], [ "None.\n\nTB2 will still have ton of imported equipment however this is how it has to be. TB2 is supposed to be cheap so wasting money in development is not a good thing.\n\nThat’s the problem when r/Armenia etc. Jokes about TB2 being mostly import because it’s supposed to be. We have 70%-80% domestic drones developed by TAI and they are far more superior to TB2. We can produce as much of them to give away to Azerbaijan however.", "775" ], [ "Yes it’s almost like I can’t explain this basic thing to Armenians. We have some historical problems and yes we are involved with arms sale but there’s no reason you focus on us more than Israel.\n\nWe are just selling arms... Azerbaijan is not even in NATO so they really can’t be that close of a friend with us if they don’t cut ties with Russia.\n\nIt’s nothing but business and election propaganda of <PERSON>.", "26" ], [ "Well this is between you and Azerbaijan. Not that I will have any say in this but I’m absolutely certain that Turkey will never be directly involved in this war.\n\nMaybe you should calm people around you with the fact that Turkey even if successful has nothing to gain from invading Armenia(considering Russia will interfere being even being successful means hundreds of thousands of dead). \n\nI mean Armenia is full of Armenians there’s no resource except the people. Considering the media always shows us like we try to finish our unfinished business that’s even dumber as I said literally Armenia has only Armenians😅. You have very little amount of natural resources so you should focus on technology and education and I see nothing to gain from invading Armenia personally.", "26" ], [ "I see that most people don’t know what a **fighter pilot** is.\n\n“Others such as <PERSON>] and <PERSON>] preceded her as military pilots in other roles, but not as fighter pilots and without military academy enrollment.”\n\nHer Wikipedia page.\n\nNot everybody has to know military pilot roles and difference between air-to-air and air-to-ground combat and role assignments but it makes sense to read the title and search in Google accordingly.", "863" ], [ "Cool but it won’t show anything realistic that way.\n\nFor example Pizzaland elections:\n\nRight wing Pizza Union gets 35%\n\nLeft wing Pizza Union gets 30%\n\nCommunist Pizza Union gets 20%\n\nAnd other parties.\n\n\nIn multi-party system first party won but if you remove the other parties 20% who voted for the communist party will likely vote for the left wing party making the left wing party win.\n\nThis is why most countries have second round of elections if a party doesn’t win by 50% majority.", "207" ], [ "When you go to a country you should learn their language not vice verse. This is unacceptable behaviour by the Swedish librarians.\n\nEveryone permanently living in a country at a given time either has to know the official language or be in the process of learning it. If not this is an insult to everyone in the country.\n\nComing from a country where shop signs, street signs, advertisements turned into Arabic overnight. Of course <PERSON> loosing support right now has removed them but people know what he prefers. It becomes worse Sweden stop acting the hero.", "930" ], [ "ISTANBUL, Nov 9 (Reuters) - Turkey's lira surged 2% against the U.S. dollar on Monday, after Finance Minister <PERSON> said he was resigning for health reasons, the second surprise departure of a top economic policymaker in two days after the central bank chief was ousted.\n\nThe lira TRYTOM=D3 stood at 8.3650 against the dollar at 0325 GMT, strengthening from a close of 8.5445 on Friday, with analysts saying that the departure of the two top policymakers had set the stage for a sharp interest rate rise.\n\nThe upheaval follows a 30% slide in the lira to record lows this year amid the COVID-19 pandemic, as investors worried about falling forex reserves and the central bank's ability to tackle double-digit inflation.\n\n<PERSON>'s resignation, announced in an Instagram statement confirmed by an official, came a day after his father-in-law President <PERSON> replaced the central bank governor with a former minister whose policies are seen to be at odds with <PERSON>.\n\n\"I have decided that I cannot continue as a minister, which I have been carrying out for nearly five years, due to health problems,\" the statement said. <PERSON> became finance minister two years ago after serving as energy minister.\n\nTwo sources at the presidency could neither confirm nor deny the statement when reached by Reuters, but a Finance Ministry official confirmed its authenticity.\n\n<PERSON>, who appointed former finance minister <PERSON> as the new central bank governor on Saturday, would need to approve the resignation.", "587" ], [ "I still want to believe <PERSON> is an Islamist and his policies are bad especially on the matter of freedom(expression, media etc.) but I don’t think he ever had bad intentions.\n\nIslamist in Turkey we’re oppressed pre-2003 and even CHP supporters don’t deny this. They were arrested for unreasonable crimes and were absolutely not allowed to be represented in politics. <PERSON> was banned from universities and the parliament for example. <PERSON> himself was arrest for reading pro-Islamist poem.\n\nThis is very similar situation to what secular Turks face now in Turkey. Maybe he looks in the mirror one day and sees that he has become the enemy of the people, the oppressors he was against in his early days.", "293" ], [ "Turkey never had an national animal usually they are shown as Van Cat and Gray Wolf(AKA Timber Wolf) but we never officially declared a national animal.\n\nOur national symbol is indeed a a female hero.\n\nThe Gray Wolf is usually just used by the Far Right. You won’t see it declared as national animal in any government site as it is not but for some reason it appears around the internet as “national animal of Turkey”.", "26" ], [ "There are many private institution teaching Kurdish. There are schools with Kurdish as second language.\n\nIt would have been nice if all Kurds had option to learn Kurdish but that’s in no way an obligation rather a plus.\n\nBanned and is not being thought in school are two different things.\n\nAlso I’m openly atheist in Turkey I have never faced an issue dunno about Alevis.\n\nStop spreading lies.", "26" ], [ "Regions that have had heavy losses though the war have more female population regions that didn’t have more equal or male.\n\nThat will never change until there’s immigration of males into the country. As birth ratio(male to female) will always stay the same. The only other option is if females somehow die more than males until the gap closes.\n\nSome experts say somehow(magic I guess) after war females give birth to more males but even if that’s true it won’t be enough for WW2. I doubt this is true because humans are not some kind of collective organisms lol.", "490" ], [ "Generation doesn’t matter population grows but the ratio stays the same if female population doesn’t decrease or male population doesn’t rise.\n\nIf there are no more males born in the gap will never close.\n\n100 people are born every year 50 of them are male and 50 female. 20 males die if somehow one of the year there is no 70 males born the gap of 20 will always be there.\n\nOne side needs to decrease or the other to increase to equalize.", "490" ], [ "Thank you mate I do wish Kurdish was actively promoted by Turkey. \n\nMaybe if Turkey acted a little bit more like the UK instead of what they did Kurdish separatism was never going to be a thing. By oppressing people you make them different than yourself and you put them in a group while everybody is just a human trying to live his/her life.\n\nI think every citizen of Turkey should know Turkish no matter what(or be in the process of learning it) but this doesn’t mean Kurdish language and history shouldn’t be thought in school. It’s just that mother tongue law is one of the things I support especially in this age where we have 1/8 of our country filled with people who have nothing to do with it. Government treats those people better than Kurds who are our own people...", "26" ], [ "Turks before the formation of Turkey had no national identity. Every ethnicity in the Empire created their own national identity(Age of Nationalism). When you are the ruling ethnicity in the Empire your biggest enemy is nationality so you never adopt one and you give your allegiance only to the Emperor nothing else.\n\nConsidering this <PERSON> had to form a national identity if he wanted to establish any kind of country or the fight was lost from the start. Some radical steps were taken but they were much needed.\n\nGood for some people bad for other but he didn’t do it because he is a racist or any other personal feeling.", "26" ], [ "I wish Turkey extended its arm I wish we were peacekeepers in the region but it is not like that. I don’t like what <PERSON> is doing but I doubt we will be ever involved in Armenia.\n\nWhen we tried to make peace and good relations with Armenia they killed the diplomats who were establishing relation with Turkey... there was literally a shooting in Armenian parliament.\n\nDon’t act like we are the only problem", "26" ] ]
395
[ 13877, 14874, 4051, 1939, 272, 3234, 6965, 703, 16485, 11035, 6004, 12970, 3277, 17661, 21982, 2475, 5331, 1370, 15684, 24510, 17290, 24799, 22041, 6950, 1017, 10781, 8877, 23885, 12330, 20826, 873, 6971, 17866, 11853, 9459, 7998, 22950, 572, 7826, 12033, 13781, 5790, 6014, 4478, 24814, 16620, 12532, 22790, 242, 10736, 21049, 1164, 22563, 7384, 6799, 2582, 4442, 1314, 8485, 6308, 1113, 15765, 17569, 10131, 21592, 7472, 15999, 171, 6060, 3315, 10351, 6548, 23452, 15644, 3505, 2003, 15010, 7569, 15587, 25439, 8634, 10243, 10289, 11238, 12512, 17255, 5705, 14917, 17622, 21312, 4881, 18875, 2721, 21914, 860, 11734, 7005, 18159, 7612, 11521, 24884, 21579, 520, 5070, 365, 13143, 20543, 5841, 9337, 15106, 6313, 1638, 19710, 6015, 7560, 7631, 5212, 5772, 24487, 2756, 20711, 9859, 18114, 1843, 12992, 24923, 10911, 7261, 9064, 18567, 518, 15215, 1951, 20203, 5658, 2718, 8883, 16930, 7884, 20818, 1215, 1527, 14616, 978, 17316, 3340, 4798, 785, 4380, 9058, 15903, 4917, 21039, 7699, 20570, 24336, 293, 1091, 10173, 12653, 20485, 988, 19993, 13577, 9862, 6066, 19757, 1111, 19115, 4829, 6774, 11387, 5104, 22490, 11604, 11850, 23669, 19898, 6894, 13873, 19809, 24143, 18509, 15756, 14388, 10939, 8101, 308, 24101, 10526, 12905, 22278, 19235, 19299, 2462, 2246, 9120, 16812, 6049, 2105, 2987, 7688, 2131, 6480, 18730, 14389, 2557, 22834, 3621, 8205, 7067, 17496, 14563, 11202, 9673, 25170, 4575, 15000, 9619, 14079, 16728, 12480, 12035, 6758, 23833, 5473, 11890, 23799, 11354, 3983, 20724, 4489, 15339, 23108, 21367, 20953, 19833, 2432, 14881, 20940, 4916, 17471, 22543, 3999, 21478, 1653, 2111, 1470, 20725, 3386, 24647, 11533, 5425, 22147, 8696, 9677, 12566, 21101, 20095, 2138, 25498, 1548, 25393, 9502, 2311, 9558, 3391, 24281, 12216, 19447, 3928, 14371, 5590, 23138, 7488, 9520, 12202, 5194, 14200, 23663, 6343, 5193, 24355, 1064, 18647, 11610, 8130, 22400, 7376, 15097, 25120, 16626, 12265, 20965, 13446, 8497, 19895, 9725, 22065, 10079, 2764, 21669, 12840, 202, 24552, 1467, 6419, 21028, 24261, 12656, 21282, 1646, 534, 10689, 20443, 7407, 9855, 13901, 6892, 7725, 12125, 20126, 11641, 18804, 10198, 3222, 2048, 20505, 3383, 24964, 19238, 12243, 7828, 22904, 14584, 4899, 5218, 25464, 3475, 21416, 13589, 24259, 25359, 10070, 10081, 23840, 21104, 11534, 1831, 18157, 9988, 17512, 8363, 72, 6281, 11159, 11403, 1488, 13996, 10178, 21604, 6858, 22321, 2809, 13040, 19303, 7726, 20077, 19503, 21153, 3981, 23034, 6046, 587, 11876, 14762, 235, 7719, 21482, 20549, 11408, 2292, 4310, 401, 1886, 18540, 21873, 25033, 19801, 6297, 6442, 12900, 21647, 10886, 6770, 17283, 12692, 24474, 12259, 22432, 22265, 18443, 5060, 6836, 11295, 8761, 6985, 25278, 4071, 21513, 16848, 20242, 25197, 5624, 6730, 25065, 12299, 19402, 18570, 8849, 24864, 6217, 13564, 18727, 7418, 23611, 7592, 1131, 19225, 18444, 24237, 15619, 6104, 22134, 22486, 21271, 23584, 18363, 16083, 3438, 94, 7504, 18010, 6355, 24894, 18427, 9996, 24882, 18510, 18657, 11973, 6232, 9617, 18677, 5403, 8139, 14021, 18584, 20916, 1018, 13935, 9495, 23209, 8266, 14757, 24865, 3196, 23535, 4086, 12500, 8555, 6865, 19502, 5538, 4376, 11826, 7582, 7155, 10986, 19141, 1264, 23842, 20347, 3212, 21399, 14855, 23044, 10687, 5774, 9947, 19074, 22401, 8866, 4638, 5930, 967, 7071, 15467, 18381 ]
reddit_dump_-GregTheGreat-
[ [ "I think there is a level of nuance. Most suburban moderates aren’t remotely going to be alienated if you’re talking about how ‘you’re going to prioritize Canada first in trade’ and stuff like that. Straight up using ‘Canada First’ as a slogan during your federal campaign could backfire though.\n\nNow, ‘Take Canada Back’ was obviously awful and straight indefensible as a slogan.", "760" ], [ "He wasn’t. This was pretty blatantly an excuse for <PERSON> to remove a politically toxic member of his caucus and distance himself from the far-right (given all the drama that has been happening down south).\n\nEdit:\n\n > <PERSON> statement says <PERSON> is out \"not because of one specific event, but because of a pattern of destructive behaviour involving multiple incidents and disrespect towards the Conservative team for over a year.\"\n\n > Calls his actions a \"consistent distraction.\" \n\nSo yeah, it wasn’t really about the donation, it just served as a catalyst.", "915" ], [ "> <PERSON> statement says <PERSON> is out \"not because of one specific event, but because of a pattern of destructive behaviour involving multiple incidents and disrespect towards the Conservative team for over a year. \n\n > Calls his actions a \"consistent distraction.\" \n\nI just pulled that off Twitter. It’s clear that this was more of a politically convenient final straw then truly ejecting him for the donation.", "140" ], [ "One of <PERSON>’s biggest legacies will be kickstarting the ‘tough on China’ stance that nearly every other liberal democracy has joined into. It’s one of the few policy goals that will last beyond his tenure and something that I don’t believe <PERSON> would have been as willing to follow into.\n\nNow, he did a bad job at actually being tough on China but that’s besides the point", "533" ], [ "Potentially dumb question, but is anyone able to concretely say if NanoAvionics (which AST & Science owns a controlling share of) is going to be part of the NPA deal? I’ve only solely seen them talking about the Spacemobile part, and they haven’t mentioned Nanoavionics at all in any of the publicity for the deal. I’ve seen so many people saying contradictory things about it though.", "662" ], [ "Huh, is that a positive comment about <PERSON> I see? 🧐\n\nDid you know she singlehandedly locked up millions of African American men, was the sole person who ordered transgender people to be locked in the wrong prisons, and laughed at people who she sent to jail? It’s literally impossible for her to ever do a good thing and I’m truly arguing in good faith", "759" ], [ "Citron (a notorious short seller) recently took a short position in GameStop and said they were going to stream their reasoning yesterday. At the last minute, they cancelled because they forgot that yesterday was the inauguration and nobody would be paying attention. So they tried streaming today, except their stream wouldn’t work and basically just keeps freezing and buffering. In response to that, the GameStop stock started skyrocketing (directly backfiring on Citron and helping Wallstreetbets instead).", "96" ], [ "Yes, that was me. Thank you! I read through the presentation awhile ago but I wasn’t explicitly looking for it at the time so must have missed it. \n\nSo if I’m interpreting it right then their Nano stake should be part of the ASTS/NPA valuation, but naturally won’t be included in any revenue projections given Nano will just be reinvesting everything back into themselves?", "662" ], [ "I’m no constitutional scholar, but wouldn’t it just realistically play out like you said with no crisis? It’s the Queen’s constitutional duty to appoint the Governor General, and its convention for her to listen to the prime ministers advice. If <PERSON> didn’t want to resign, he phones up ol’ <PERSON>. She removes her, replaces her with <PERSON>’s new choice, and issue over. We have a bit of egg on our face but that’s it.", "216" ] ]
90
[ 9690, 4224, 18267, 24559, 16782, 19043, 9419, 24052, 15893, 8467, 16107, 15254, 4574, 11255, 14318, 19709, 2640, 20887, 20877, 4195, 12686, 249, 12403, 9843, 7547, 3781, 5754, 18702, 8363, 5696, 18497, 20876, 6360, 22932, 6970, 13711, 10928, 15266, 8109, 12973, 3038, 12388, 23328, 11217, 6385, 5490, 9652, 5862, 2327, 10525, 13618, 10037, 5768, 6376, 490, 22638, 1428, 21398, 1376, 17607, 21698, 20528, 24880, 24362, 23175, 14676, 332, 14659, 13702, 20770, 12831, 21306, 20878, 3864, 14979, 13755, 16188, 4863, 163, 12859, 24607, 16412, 9544, 6310, 21905, 8744, 12811, 13796, 13368, 22674, 1027, 17177, 15807, 9638, 15091, 6694, 15846, 22327, 5008, 8496, 19373, 2199, 3743, 1187, 14912, 13769, 15275, 25430, 18858, 6928, 22302, 7179, 24601, 2307, 13104, 13090, 12722, 851, 11875, 1439, 3921, 24866, 24765, 4439, 25421, 10077, 19542, 2259, 16594, 3055, 13765, 4570, 18901, 6587, 21129, 16458, 18569, 3192, 12800, 6482, 23806, 10246, 2225, 22923, 7597, 21460, 11302, 6083, 14788, 13214, 24687, 14469, 18343, 22007, 13720, 8616, 7431, 1994, 1878, 14189, 1455, 12984, 3093, 25450, 10724, 16799, 2026, 8700, 20186, 9294, 6445, 7328, 4518, 10922, 12054, 18126, 13916, 16411, 23411, 12972, 15713, 20731, 23425, 19556, 19526, 8520, 10575, 18162, 24142, 4811, 17644, 3874, 14108, 2286, 1128, 6370, 2144, 6434, 15084, 14289, 20013, 18233, 8426, 14136, 25157, 25350, 2996, 15525, 15857, 8735, 11763, 8774, 16495, 2693, 16407, 19060, 3967, 9434, 23696, 13656, 16320, 23296, 408, 18161, 24387, 2778, 18023, 728, 12267, 11103, 23801, 11485, 16686, 18718, 4928, 14493, 5063, 12346, 24264, 8751, 367, 6680, 10254, 11219, 21317, 357, 9087, 17628, 10483, 12391, 16709, 16529, 5724, 11267, 6856, 23826, 18894, 19580, 19217, 11130, 5674, 17480, 955, 528, 13831, 22589, 23894, 675, 15851, 22816, 2358, 17164, 24200, 1796, 12785, 20743, 14246, 1160, 12999, 2294, 22886, 1282, 22506, 5075, 14559, 19401, 3267, 16666, 20725, 21471, 17984, 461, 4522, 12479, 5614, 22034, 8105, 21832, 6208, 5073, 8508, 24584, 16786, 12095, 19462, 22418, 6805, 6429, 10680, 23514, 10394, 20135, 19993, 6551, 8256, 3591, 15411, 25298, 7613, 4482, 12154, 12900, 4156, 4406, 5103, 19698, 10532, 13248, 10162, 14943, 19223, 8353, 6415, 5249, 24395, 25503, 14278, 9296, 753, 23362, 3231, 13783, 598, 14293, 1699, 1550, 21229, 8720, 3809, 6786, 23486, 12038, 11437, 20727, 23545, 1230, 3198, 3685, 8939, 15006, 20299, 7374, 16173, 1654, 8310, 2461, 17671, 6527, 1972, 3847, 13453, 24175, 2873, 2177, 1028, 2525, 6850, 14818, 16753, 2425, 17601, 752, 21648, 20988, 10082, 11557, 10105, 24579, 8694, 5528, 2312, 20503, 16734, 9784, 12881, 12340, 5690, 8080, 6603, 1323, 9033, 9562, 22789, 17455, 23125, 3486, 16120, 11783, 18205, 8493, 2403, 4267, 13573, 22046, 1334, 24545, 7441, 23235, 23687, 14376, 17791, 11551, 8492, 1725, 22587, 5248, 6862, 4797, 2947, 22852, 606, 5492, 17043, 17672, 12998, 9575, 6807, 17680, 21613, 20359, 11805, 475, 19183, 22613, 21401, 20350, 11305, 6217, 9556, 12264, 15399, 12840, 7459, 349, 8301, 21355, 22593, 6409, 16327, 4459, 16922, 13325, 17951, 13676, 24689, 23977, 14276, 6303, 12496, 6811, 9585, 9471, 3775, 14514, 24558, 22590, 6346, 5932, 23052, 10968, 7385, 17101, 10416, 21519, 252, 9998, 14272, 6302, 20562, 9931, 24230, 3581, 23464, 18511, 1936, 2756, 12720, 3370, 8678 ]
reddit_dump_-GroovyChick-
[ [ "I'm from Russia and I can guarantee you that I'm probably the only person in my country who can understand <PERSON>. Usually I have no problem with understanding <PERSON>, it's just a little bit harder, but I can understand some bits from the context, it's easier to understand what he says nowadays, because he was even worse in the early years (thick accent, plus his mind kinda wanders a bit, he can start one phrase and won't finish it, or can say something really fast/quiet). There was a joke (amongst non-english speaking Oasis fans) that if you understand <PERSON> - you can understand anyone and your English level is beyond advanced.\n\nps My mom (When we listened to radio and <PERSON> couldn't shut up) You can understand what they're saying?\n\nMe: Mom, I can understand **<PERSON>**, and you're asking me about these guys!", "5" ], [ "I won't be a good mother, too much responsibility, I won't be able to give my child anything, I don't want to torture my future kid like that. I don't know what to do with them, how to raise them, what to say, etc. I can babysit a kid, that's about it. I don't hate kids, but that thing is not for me, I don't want to have kids not because of my ego \\- but because I really can't bring up one \\- poor thing will starve/be neglected and probably have issues later on. If you have a shitty dad \\- it's no biggie, a lot of people do, but if you have a shitty mom \\- you're fucked.", "361" ], [ "I always thought that Oasis/other British stuff were pretty popular in Poland, guess i was wrong, if you have no clue then why go to <PERSON>'s solo gig? In the 90's no one had a clue about Oasis either, people fancied stuff like Prodigy and Nirvana, but in the middle of the 00's British indie bands became hugely popular.\n\nps My mom is Polish, cheers!", "788" ], [ "It's cool that Oasis have fans even in Vietnam! Who cares about radio stations when you have Internet and can discover anything yourself?\n\nps A lot of Russian indie (and not so indie) radio stations played Oasis songs, even singles from the later albums. They even played WoG and HM last year, maybe they played other solo-stuff singles as well.", "782" ], [ "Placebo toured here (like proper tour, not just 1-2 concerts) a couple of years ago, they were always popular here, <PERSON> was here 4 times (he was here last weak) and <PERSON> was here once. Like I said before - some bands are more popular in Brazil than in Denmark.\n\nps Britpop, shoegaze and post-punk are big things here, if we're talking about young plastic Brit hipsters. Oasis would have made money here, unlike some less popular British bands.", "146" ], [ "What's your fav songs from this one?\n\nHere we go\n\nNGHFB could be me fav album, if 'Alone on the Rope' and 'Game of genius' were on it, but I don't like the production at all, Sardy sucked the life out of it. But it's a good album, the first half is amazing, the second one is just good.\n\nCY is my fav in terms of songs, it's the most coherent record (yet). Also production is much better, <PERSON> is capable of producing the record himself. TDOTL is my fav <PERSON>'s solo song ever. This album is a perfect combination of melodies and experimental stuff. It's the best post\\-Oasis release for me (at least at this moment).\n\nHis latest record is the most inspired one, it really sounds like he had a lot of recording it. Kudos to him for making something new and coming out of his comfort zone, not every old fart can do that. It would be too boring to have another CY or album full of mid\\-tempo tracks. My faves are Keep On Reaching, 'Sunshine' and the title track. It has two fillers (intrumentals), but it's still a very good record, probably the only flaw that it's not that... melodic? But HM and STMHTF are still very catchy. Can't wait for the next one, it's interesting with what he'll come up the next time, given the fact that he writes on the bass now.\n\nps <PERSON>'s stage presence really improved since his first record.", "665" ], [ "Only yesterday I thought \\- 'Hmm, <PERSON> is too quiet nowadays, it's too boring, he should tweet something' lol. Plus <PERSON> will play with <PERSON> in a few days, so I expect a new rant from <PERSON>. <PERSON> went back to his ' <PERSON> doesn't exist' tactics. <PERSON> doesn't even need to react to <PERSON>'s comments about him (because he doesn't talk about <PERSON> anymore) \\- so he just brings back something from 2011. These versions exist, but <PERSON> won't release them \\- so what? Plus in the latest 00's <PERSON> already sounded better than <PERSON>, but it would be nice to hear these things, but \\- alas!\n\nps Also I thought that they have met after 2009 at some point?", "323" ], [ "Nah, all that hatred towards <PERSON> died out a little bit, but things were pretty nasty in the fall, I've seen a lot of shit and got pretty biased towards <PERSON>. Plus people slagged off <PERSON> when he was away. some people are just stupid. Yeah, <PERSON> got back to his old tactics '<PERSON> doesn't exist'. He said a lot of stuff about <PERSON> in the past year, but it was because <PERSON> said a lot of stuff about <PERSON> as well. but what they both say about each other doesn't affect my perceptions of either of them.", "182" ], [ "Wow! That's so exciting! This man never rests, he's so devoted! A lot of great music is ahead! Don't know is it's a <PERSON> album or not, but <PERSON> said that he has one unreleased album, so maybe it won't be a <PERSON> album \\- <PERSON> will do his thing and <PERSON> will record something on his own too.\n\nWishful thinking \\- <PERSON> and <PERSON> are making music together.", "419" ], [ "When did I say Oasis isn't a great band? Mate, I mocked your username because 'supper' and 'super' mean different things! Supper is the main evening meal! You didn't undertand my comment? I just mocked your spelling and you turn it into a rant about Oasis, 'effect the music' and you thought that I'm a Noel's stan for some reason. I love Oasis that's why I'm hanging around this subreddit. Your English is far from perfect that's why I didn't understand your comment, I was just goofing around.\n\nps Btw, it was <PERSON>'s and <PERSON>'s band (Yes I'm a total <PERSON> hater, check out my avatar and signature). If I was a <PERSON>'s stan I would say that <PERSON> is untalented cunt or something like that. If you have problems with <PERSON> - fine, but I don't have problems with either of them and I don't think that the real fans should pick sides.\n\npps You wrote 'As you were' like I told you so! Good boy!", "419" ], [ "??? <PERSON>'s worked with <PERSON> a couple of weeks ago. He promised that it'll sound like Bring It On Down. Check out his Twitter.\n\nps Why we don't mention his name? Is he some sort of Lord <PERSON> or something? If I say '<PERSON>' in front of the mirror - will he appear?\n\npps I start to think that you're actually <PERSON> himself lol. Seriously - where are you from? You're quite a character.", "25" ], [ "My mom read to me a couple of pretty scary fairytales \\(about vampires and witches\\) when I was 4. It scared the shit out of me, she was truly sorry. But I wasn't traumatized for life, I just cried when he finished her reading and then I forgot about it. I found these fairylates a few years ago and read them again and then reminded my mom about them. She said 'Geez you was so scared' and I was like 'Of course I was, these faitytales are very entertaining, but they're not for kids'. Idk why my mom thought it was a good idea to read them to me, probably because she was 'a young mom' and she didn't really thought about the consequences. Plus she really loves horror movies and I think I inherited this trait from her.", "630" ], [ "Yup I hope he'll change his setlist, it's great and balanced, but it's becomming pretty boring now, he just swept BAWS with ILITL. I wonder - will he be able to pull off the title track? I don't like how some of his new songs sound live either (with the exception of BAWS maybe), they're either too fast or slow. I hope he'll play some Oasis classics too (but the ones that he sang originally) and play some other songs from his solo-career (for example Alone on the Rope).", "158" ], [ "Maybe some people just didn't get used to them. When I've heard ITHOTM for the first time I thought 'WTF? What he's doing?'. I also believe that it's better to listen to ballads/slow songs than to the plodding ones (like Mucky Fingers). Of course <PERSON> doesn't want to cling to nostalgia, he wants to move forward, there's nothing wrong with that. I don't want him to sing Supersonic or other Liam's songs anyway. Maybe The Masterplan?\n\nps Be careful and TRS... something have to go, these songs are quite similar. <PERSON> should get rid of one of them and bring back BAWS or play something else. He needs to add some more energetic songs to his shows. The Mexican maybe?\n\npps Maybe <PERSON> should start jumping on stage or something? At least he jokes about how shitty other towns are, it keep the crowd entertained. Both Gallagehr aren't performers anyway.", "158" ], [ "> because even Oasis trash is another band’s gold record.\n\nYup everyone knows that some Oasis b-sides are better than some band's A-sides. I like lyrics on LBL and MP lyrics, esp. the lyrics on the first one, (But my God woke up on the wrong side of his bed), MP has some corny lines, but it's good overal or at least not that bad as lyrics of Force of Nature or She Is Love.", "158" ], [ "I don't really think that <PERSON> is fond of Twitter and it's comment section (for obv. reasons), plus this guy replies to people... 'SM is for squares, innit?'. He has Insta account, but I really doubt that he scrolls down the comments. But the writing style is very similar to <PERSON>'s, so I don't know what to think.\n\nps But this thing is funny as hell 'Where I will find an other guitarist who can play Wonderwall?'. Allegedly Anais follows this account, someone should ask <PERSON> about this thing.", "371" ], [ "Yeah people always like 'Do you even eat? You was on diet?'. Idk what really happened, I eat helthy and don't exercise that much, althought I like to take long walks in the summer, probably my metabolism started to work in a different way. I was always kinda skinny, but my face was chubby.\n\nps Yeah green eyes rule!", "327" ], [ "Don't fucking read/watch any news, fuck it, everyone's lying to you. Politics topics is a pretty exhausting thing anyway, everyone's just screaming and no one wants to listen. If someone asks me 'Do you wantch the news? What do you think about that?', I always say 'No' and 'Nothing'. Art will save us all, anyway. Enjoy art, don't discuss politics.", "30" ], [ "It's better for him now, he has more freedom that before, because nothing stops his creativiry process and he basically can do what he wants. But DOYS wasn't a typical Oasis record, it has some 'non\\-typical'Oasis songs. \\(And I don't think that <PERSON> doesn't like LAMB, but he slagged off ICSAL in 2001\\), but he prolly didn't like <PERSON>'s acoustic melancholic songs because that's not rock'n'roll and <PERSON> started to sing more and more with years.\n\nps I remember that a couple of years ago <PERSON> said that <PERSON> is weird lol.", "419" ], [ "Second that! Now here come my rant.\n\nIn 2015 people praised <PERSON> and said that <PERSON> became a has\\-been who can't sing anymore, some people gave up on him. Now <PERSON> came back and some people jumped on his bandwagon because its cool to like <PERSON> again. Herd behaviour? Some people sided with <PERSON> because he embrases the past more than <PERSON> \\(and some people think that AYW sounds like Oasis, but I don't think that way\\), he represant Oasis more, and <PERSON>'s music now sounds complenetely different, his aproach to music changed, he wants to move forward \\(maybe too much\\) and don't have time for nostalgia and some 'convervative' fans don't like that. Plus some people think that <PERSON> is new <PERSON> because he doesn't want a reunion \\(and he broke up Oasis\\) or don't care what people think about his new music \\(that doesn't sound like Oasis at all too\\) or because he 'sold out'. To each their own, more music for me, it's not really interesting when you just prefer the one over the other. Why not both? When you can compare their music and career without all this drama, it's pretty interesting. I've seen a couple of <PERSON>'s haters too but I don't think that <PERSON>'s a dick because some people think that why or because <PERSON> said so. The same can be said about <PERSON>. I have my own opinion and perceptions, and other people \\(and The <PERSON> themselves\\) won't change that.\n\nps If you want to see some love for <PERSON> \\- visit Noelthegoodrebel Insta \\(or Twitter\\) account. Or velvetsky67 Insta accont. But they're both dedicated to his solo career.", "419" ], [ "Some people slagged <PERSON> off in the past, now people slag <PERSON> off \\- it's just shows how stupid people can be. Is this some sort of revenge \\- people slagged <PERSON> \\- now it's <PERSON>'s time? <PERSON> sometimes acts like a prick too. <PERSON> isn't that arrogant, he can be a bit of cunt, he pissed me off a couple of times last year, but he still got his charm. Don't know about <PERSON>, wasn't an Oasis fan in 2011, but I know that he got a tin of hate, but I've seen a lot of hate towards <PERSON> last year, proper hate, not just 'his new album is meh'. <PERSON> sold out, he's ugly, he always sucked, he turned into his father, he lost his talent, his wife is a witch, he broke up Oasis yadda yadda yadda. Some people just like to hate <PERSON>, because 'he changed and <PERSON> is real, man' his new album has nothing to do with that, besides he was making stuff like that in the past. It's just <PERSON> came back, he slagged off <PERSON> a couple of times and some people believe him entirely and now these people are confident because 'good <PERSON>' came back and now they can spread hate more than before, than when he was sitting at home. That's not a dig at <PERSON>, love him to bits, but people need to be more level\\-headed and not to choose sides, both of them can be dicks.", "182" ], [ "He lost much of his fanbase? Idk maybe some people \\(including me\\) don't like his solo stuff, but his perfomances are good, he sounds good. But I still think that he and <PERSON> needed each other, because <PERSON>'s guitar genius and <PERSON>'s melancholic lyricsism worked so well together. Bur it's still an ideal opening act for <PERSON>, because many Oasis fans like The Verve, plus <PERSON> is his friend. He should write a song for <PERSON>.", "665" ], [ "Like I said before - herd behaviour. Some people didn't care about <PERSON> that much when he was sitting at home. Now it's cool to like him again and it means... to dislike <PERSON>? Is this some sort of revenge - at first slag off <PERSON> and then - <PERSON>? <PERSON> is right and good because he came back? But when <PERSON> cancelled a show - now he's bad again and we need to write to him that <PERSON> never does that. What <PERSON> has to do with it anyway?\n\nps Really? People thought that <PERSON>'s album would suck? I always knew that it become a hit, because people missed him.", "419" ], [ "You stick with someone through thick and thin, not just jump on the band wagon or hate someone because people hate this person. People should thin with their own heads. I wasn't hyped for AYW, because I barely listened to Oasis at that time period, but I knew that it would be a hit. I liked FWIW immideatly, wasn't sure about WoG and didn't care for Chinatown. I wasn't hyped for CY, because I didn't really cared about <PERSON>'s solo stuff at that time, brcause I was still listening to Oasis, but I was hyped as fuck for WBTM straight away because it was something different, I saw the trailer and thought 'It's gonna be good'.", "788" ], [ "Love them both, but that's true, Blur are still together \\(kind of\\), their fanbase didn't split up, it would be strange as hell if Blur fans behaved like some Oasis fans and fought over <PERSON>'s and <PERSON>'s solo careers. Plus Blur's career was more evoling and Oasis burnt out pretty fast.\n\nps When Go out was released I was so happy, I even cried happy tears because it was a really nice surprise.", "782" ], [ "Maybe it has something to do with the fact that members of Blur worked together, they wrote music together, they had chemistry, all of them were different, but it worked well, it was like a four-headed monster (my God, that's <PERSON> quote). They had their rows, but they remained friends. When it comes to Oasis - it was 100% <PERSON>'s vision during the early years, he wrote everything and controlled almost everything too, he was the brains, then everyone started to write songs, but they all worked alone. But of course it doesn't mean that they didn't have chemistry, but the working process was different.", "419" ], [ "He changed in the last couple of years, didn't he? Hangs around with all these celebrities non\\-stop, forgot his roots.\n\nPolitical rants? I think that you confused him with <PERSON>. That bit about <PERSON> was stupid but <PERSON> didn't really talk about politics that much.\n\nAnyway, if we're talking serious \\- he's still pretty fucking funny, his posts on Insta account are pretty hilarious, plus he can say something funny in the interviews from time to time. Are we talking about the same guy? I see only the positive things.", "936" ], [ "I wouldn't say it's weak, to each their own, it's pretty subjective anyway, some people didn't like it because it's kinda different and people liked <PERSON>'s album and welcomed him because they missed him. Even if <PERSON>'s record was 'traditional' some people wouldn't care because <PERSON> came back. But controversy can be good \\- at least people talk about <PERSON> and his record, regarding of what they thinking about it. Would they be talking about a collection of plodding songs? People wouldn't care about it at all. Some people are just confident now because <PERSON>'s successful again and it means that it's time to slag <PERSON> off because they couldn't do that in 2015. Some people just hate <PERSON>. Period.\n\nps who knows \\- how the things will be in 5 years?", "419" ], [ "Who knows what will happen in 10 years? He has not only recorded another album, but he changed his approach to music big time, plus he wants to make another one with <PERSON> as well and did stuff like this in the past. And he has more freedom now, who how what kind of album he'll release next time? Some people that don't lke this one kinda hope that <PERSON> will slag it off in the future for some reason. <PERSON> said 100 times that he doesn't care if people like it or not, in September he said that this album won't sell as much as his previous records but he doesn't care. He seems more happier today than in 1998, when he was touring BHN and coming off drugs anyway. <PERSON> slagged his albums in the past, but it doesn't mean that he'll slag off this one as well. He didn't slag off this previous solo records. Even if he'll slag off this thing, it doesn't matter for me, because I like this one. Maybe he'll criticize some bits, but not the whole thing.", "419" ], [ "He also said that people gave him a lot of BHN copies to sign and he was impressed by the fact that people still buy this thing. He has some regrets, but not many. He hates BHN, of course, but I wonder what he thinks about the last 3 Oasis records.\n\nps I think he will be bragging about his number one albums for the rest of his life, he's proud of this archievement.", "936" ], [ "Really? Oasis hater? That's pretty refreshing!\n\nYou're not a very nice person, mate, if you call other people mentally challenged, go listen to <PERSON>'s last album if you think that he's been doing the same stuff for years. Maybe you have butthurt because <PERSON> slagged off <PERSON>? That's not very intellegent. And you call yourself a Radiohead fan? I thought they were all kind of brainy and don't insult other people. <PERSON> doesn't approve!\n\nps I like all these artists except <PERSON>. Am I worthy to join the intellectual club?", "419" ], [ "Usually nowadays <PERSON> criticizes bands for blandness and slags off bands that write songs about politics, of course he criticized Radiohead and AF in the past and said that <PERSON> is weird \\(when he was making this record\\), but that was 3 years ago.\n\nps I wouldn't say that a new AM album is that experimental, but nowadays <PERSON> def wouldn't criticize a band for being too expertimental because he always had a pretty eclectic taste in music, he just doesn't like some 'snobbish' bands.", "419" ], [ "I didn't even mention <PERSON>'s voice or <PERSON>'s music because many bands have good music and good vocalists, I just mention non-musicial things that made them so great. Oasis has personality, many bands sound good, but people just listen to them, no big deal, no hardcore fans. You have to have personality if you want to be remembered. I just mentioned <PERSON>'s lyrics because they're unique in some sense and not very band has good lyrics. I like Suede but <PERSON> lyrics don't do anything to me.", "419" ], [ "> probably <PERSON>'s greatest contribution to music\n\nno I meant that he chose the perfect name for a band, it's very important to have a cool band name. I didn't mean that he hasn't done anything significent in Oasis years and was useless. I love <PERSON> (take a look at my profile), I like his songs, voice and almost everything about him, who cares about YouTube comments? Yeah some people think that <PERSON> is a cunt and nothing will change that, so who cares about social media? Now it's all filled with hate towards <PERSON> anyway.", "419" ], [ "Oasis don't exist anymore, mate, relax. I know that Oasis' fans portraited as chavs with limited music taste (even <PERSON> hates this type of fans too btw), but I myself like many other music genres and listened to a lot of other bands down the years. I don't think that Radiohead fans are whiny suicidal bitches anyway.\n\nps Of course you don't care - that's why you came to this subreddit. <PERSON> likes to provoke people and offend the whole fanbases, he's known for that.", "556" ], [ "I don't think that Oasis fans listen to Oasis because their songs are hits, it's Oasis, not some pop artist. And some people listen to pop music because they genuinely like it, not because their mates listen to it as well. Pepople should discover music themselves anyway. And if the young generation likes Oasis - it'a a proof that their songs stood the test of time, unlike songs by some 00's bands.", "556" ], [ "My theory \\- <PERSON> doesn't wanna be in the same room with <PERSON> any more. <PERSON> is up for it, be he kinda slags <PERSON> off from time to time. <PERSON> said that it's beyond repair. He won't make the first step, <PERSON> won't make the first step either because he thinks that <PERSON> broke up Oasis and he needs some sort of criticism because he 'changed'.", "698" ], [ "Yeah this song is 'coming-out-of-drugs' type of song. This song is personal to <PERSON> because it was him who quit drugs (and not <PERSON>) but <PERSON> did a great job singing it and I can't imagine <PERSON> on vocals. I was talking about songs that make you ponder over things (Carry Us All, the Masterplan, Little by Little). <PERSON> can sing a song with dark or sad lyrics but when you listen to a sad/dark song that was sung by <PERSON> (I'm Outta Time), you don't really think about lyrics, you just feel his emotion. When you're listening to <PERSON> - you hear the message. But this is my personal experience.\n\nps, Of course, it's my opinion, I'm not saying one is better than the other, both are great for different ways.", "665" ], [ "Yeah but that's more interesting than just two ordinary rock concerts. <PERSON> said that after so many years to start to perceive songs in a different way. He said that he can't do 'that rock thing' anymore but he will play these songs because they mean a lot to people. Some of his versions of oasis classics are pretty interesting. So if you want 'a classic way' - listen to <PERSON>'s albums/concerts. If you want something new - here's <PERSON>.\n\nps How's <PERSON>? I know that he had a lot of health problems in the past. Can't believe some people called him a traitor and were angry at him because he is in <PERSON>'s band now. <PERSON> should kidnap him, he needs a good guitar player, <PERSON> should bring <PERSON> back :)", "788" ], [ "I don't think so. He's not that kind of person. I don't think he sees that as a competition. (But <PERSON> probably does, not a competition, but as 'You thought I don't exist anymore but I came back' type of thing). <PERSON> will be bragging about his 10th number one album instead (and maybe say that it was easy for <PERSON> because he doesn't write his songs). He gets angry only when <PERSON>'s talking stupid things about his family. And don't forget the fact that <PERSON>'s concerts make <PERSON> richer. <PERSON> said that <PERSON> means a world to him because Oasis albums are back in the charts :)", "419" ], [ "Plus this album went Platinum (like CY). Is it any wonder? People missed <PERSON> and his album is more radio-friendly. <PERSON>'s album is just different and not for anymore (I'm not saying - 'oh it's so deep you won't get it'). It's just different. It's funny how some people were complaining about <PERSON>'s plodding songs and now they're complaining about his new stuff. (But CY is still a better album in my opinion). <PERSON> deserves it - ha had many failures. <PERSON>'s career was always steady and <PERSON>'s like a rollercoaster.\n\nps Wonderful time. <PERSON>'s made an epic comeback, <PERSON> scored his 10th Number One album, two <PERSON>'s solo albums are on the way (made in different ways) and <PERSON>'s second album will sound like BIOD. What a time to be alive.\n\npps I wonder how much time the first two <PERSON>'s albums were on the charts. I also wonder why <PERSON> didn't sell all the tickets in Austria this time. It's f*cking <PERSON>!", "419" ], [ "The next few years will be very interesting (Holy Moly - 3 new albums!). All this sounds exciting. He said that his new album will sound more like Stooges/Pistols (or Bring It On Down). I hope he will take care of his voice and write a couple of tunes because I liked the songs that he wrote for AYW. Or maybe he should ask <PERSON> to write him a song. I would like to hear <PERSON> singing a <PERSON> song but that's not gonna happen :(\n\nps His last Instagram post was priceless.\n\npps Some of cosmic pop pickers liked <PERSON> as well :) Should I be afraid?", "665" ], [ "Yup you can even hug him. He said that is better than photos\n\nps Seen a video recently in which a fan was hugging <PERSON>. That girl held him as if he was some sort of saviour or lost relative and even shed a tear. You can see that <PERSON> means so much to her. another fan said that <PERSON> makes his life meaningful and <PERSON> answered that we all make each other lives' meaningful. I think it's better to communicate with people that you admire (if you have a chance) than just to take pictures.\n\npps When <PERSON> was sitting at home he was slagging <PERSON> off because he didn't like selfies. And now <PERSON> himself is tired of them lol", "480" ], [ "Yeah I like their 90s sound for its rawness (but I still think that BHN has too many guitar layers on it, <PERSON>'s vocals kinda get lost in them and you can't fucking hear the rhythm section at all). My only complaint about the old sound is that I don't fucking hear the bass because <PERSON> didn't care that much about it in the past. But he understood the importance of this instrument later and even writes songs on the bass now - we'll see what come out of it. I kinda agree that in 00's Oasis sound became a little bit cleaner, it was more natural in the 90's.\n\nps At first AYW sounded a little bit flat for my ears (like the first <PERSON>'s album). But I'm kinda got used to it now don't see the problem anymore. But CY has better production than these two. <PERSON>... I'm not sure about this one. I liked the album that's all I can say.\n\npps Of course it's my opinion, I'm not a sound engineer and English isn't even my first language but I hope that I articulated my thoughts properly.", "665" ], [ "Yup it's not that 'out there', it's just different but I liked it anyway. (But it was too much for some people who decided that <PERSON> 'lost his way' because he likes a couple of KW songs). I just don't know how to describe it's production, but it's certainly not a bad album, I only didn't like that instrumental. But for me CY is still a better album, a combination of traditional and experimental methods. And production of his last album is better than on the first one, <PERSON> kinda sucked the life out of it. And Some of <PERSON>'s new songs are better than his boring plodding stuff on the late 00's-early10'.", "665" ], [ "Asian sizes are weird because they're usually way too smaller than the European ones. and Internet Shopping can be tricky that's why I always buy clothes for myself in 'normal' stores where you can always touch the material (it can look good on picture but IRL it can be a bit unpleasant) or try on anything because maybe it won't be looking good on you. I bout a pair of Converse sneakers 4 years ago and I bought another one recently. It was 2 different models and 2 different sizes.", "433" ], [ "Actually, it was <PERSON> who called <PERSON> his former brother last year (on Twitter) and some girl even wrote that she begins to hate <PERSON>'s 'former' brother now. I remember it vividly so this guy isn't to blame. If you take it as a joke - that's fine and if you start to rant about 'which brother is wrong and which is right' - that's another level. There's no need to take it all seriously - it's like a big soap opera for me.", "182" ], [ "Wanted to create my own post and ask some questions too. I'm a casual MSP fan, don't know much about the band's life \\(although I know some stuff, watched a lot of early interviews\\). Anyway \\- I have 2 questions\n\n1. I know that <PERSON> didn't play guitar at concerts and didn't play on GT. Did he contribute some riffs for GAS and HB? Or <PERSON> did it all himself again?\n2. About writing process \\- did <PERSON> and <PERSON> write song lyrics together \\(for each song\\) or they wrote lyrics separately? Which lyrics were written by <PERSON> and which by <PERSON>?", "419" ], [ "i like the fact that <PERSON> wound up some people from this fanbase. '<PERSON> don't know anything about rock'n'roll anymore'. But of course you do \\- you're a middle\\-aged man who needs <PERSON> to so the same kind of thing that'll help you to relieve your youth. If you want to relieve your youth \\- go to <PERSON>'s concert \\(that not a dig at <PERSON> btw\\) and don't bitch about <PERSON>. Not all old Oasis fans are like that, of course. If you don't like <PERSON>'s remixes fine \\- but why you react this way? It's not the end of the world. Geez sometimes people are so conservative and music \\- it's all about expression. <PERSON> does what he wants and doesn't care what others think \\- that's the most rock'n'roll thing ever.", "419" ], [ "I think that they're tryng to milk this cow too hard. <PERSON> should take rest, but it's a big label thing, they want to make money. I just hope people won't get tired of <PERSON>, because he himself said that he needs to fuck off for a while or people will be fed up with him. He spends too much time in the public eye, but that's understandable, he was sitting on his arse for a couple of years. But I think it's too much. I'm still exicted for his record though.\n\nps <PERSON> writes with <PERSON>, he can't write a whole record on his own, it'll take him a several years. But he participates in the process very actively. They wrote 2 songs for the last album together, I suppose the writing process is the same.", "419" ], [ "CS and BIOD won't be the good live songs without <PERSON> too. And <PERSON> won't play songs from later albums, because he said that no one cared after that. I hope he will play Rocking Chair and Listen Up. Fade Away, CNS, RWI and Stay Young will be the good choices as well.", "464" ], [ "Music will be great, I'm just worried about <PERSON>'s voice, I don't think that his legasy will be ruined, most fans will buy anything that <PERSON> produces. I don't think that he will be releasing albums every year, Warner just takess advantage of the opportunity to gain more money because AYW was so succesful and <PERSON> is in limelight again.", "419" ], [ "I suppose <PERSON> just contrubuted some lines (if we're talking about WoG and CBTM). He was in the studio with <PERSON> ans <PERSON>, so I suppose his contribution was like that. Also he said that when he was in the studio he decided which bits should stay ans which should go and he didn't want this album to sound too poppy. Papercrown and Chinatown were practically given to him, that's another thing, <PERSON> didn't participate at all.\nFWIW was written with some dude, <PERSON>, he came up with the melody and then they started to work on lyrics together.\nWhen I'm In Need was written by <PERSON> (it was his second song) but there's also sound-engeneer in the credits, he kinda helped him with the sound, but <PERSON> wrote this one at home.\n\nps Saxopjones is the only thing that <PERSON> wasn't happy with, but there are saxophones on this album. Also he played acoustic guitar on a couple of tracks.", "419" ], [ "Yeah I've heard that bit about Americanisms as well. Also he said that they did 3 songs in three days (WoG, Come Back to Me and Papercrown). I suppose that he personalised the dirst two, because he got credits for it. 2 was handed out to him, FWIW was written with some guy and the others were written by <PERSON>. The first songs that were written by him were Bold and When I'm In Need, then he met with <PERSON> and <PERSON>, work with them and then wrote some more songs. I've listened to a ton of interviews last year because I wanted to know what the writing/recording process was like.\n\nps <PERSON> to 'The Guardian' in 2017 on his approach to songwriting. \"I just get my guitar, man, and I play it. I play the simplest song in the world, maybe I do bass lines, just to get a rhythm, and then I get a melody and I tape it on my phone\".", "419" ], [ "I don't think that <PERSON> will play GLIO. He also said that he wants to give people what they want (to play songs from the period when Oasis was in it's prime). But it doesn't mean that he hates these songs, in one interview he said that he loves them all. Also <PERSON> doesn't come close to the recorded vocals when he sings Slide Away, but he sings it anyway because it's a classic.\n\nps At least someone plays songs from BHN (side-eye at <PERSON>).", "419" ], [ "These two fuckers disappointed me big time last year \\(what this song is called?\\). But anyway \\- love seeing them together, they're probably two the most creative and interesting modern songwriters \\(from UK\\).\n\nps <PERSON> said that <PERSON> will probably play on his next album, what a bait!\n\npps Poor <PERSON>, <PERSON> stole his <PERSON> lol", "665" ] ]
465
[ 25250, 22351, 21032, 14752, 6009, 5117, 20936, 8414, 13128, 4881, 14115, 2068, 20938, 11836, 5111, 14131, 22448, 9531, 22563, 25133, 10729, 10209, 16124, 15069, 16590, 17078, 4342, 10871, 16353, 9020, 19473, 8104, 17317, 24932, 5707, 10480, 8046, 6892, 3346, 7928, 19308, 4975, 7287, 12333, 6548, 19848, 14523, 7137, 4023, 25481, 23611, 589, 22152, 15544, 20443, 20690, 2289, 9651, 8738, 25291, 20764, 20278, 2526, 16273, 25406, 24034, 20625, 11500, 17801, 19305, 8071, 8053, 19130, 785, 21101, 1127, 3656, 14211, 17916, 22831, 25325, 7191, 12390, 18262, 8316, 6419, 9796, 4720, 7005, 23050, 24492, 14082, 19726, 11381, 24827, 6752, 5194, 24344, 18298, 19093, 21492, 5849, 24805, 24906, 2410, 4456, 19388, 15512, 4115, 7180, 18531, 13329, 11536, 19153, 10498, 17178, 12569, 5080, 23535, 3755, 20290, 7898, 23669, 8933, 7480, 3772, 1094, 17893, 18840, 6092, 7279, 9470, 4260, 10562, 5409, 24568, 8038, 17105, 6923, 23634, 988, 10789, 5731, 23427, 19306, 9364, 6758, 22868, 18159, 19182, 11377, 14839, 17097, 4501, 1569, 13768, 20515, 2458, 860, 2111, 5513, 25494, 19817, 14756, 296, 6213, 8142, 16375, 2014, 8139, 20809, 10233, 3179, 2967, 18010, 4916, 9181, 25500, 17866, 1930, 19056, 23461, 20738, 3387, 13121, 6332, 1058, 20556, 23833, 3002, 15586, 18606, 1370, 10621, 24475, 20826, 2456, 7080, 10571, 978, 6927, 6770, 3322, 10227, 22665, 5973, 3573, 3937, 8266, 24859, 17036, 14637, 12457, 13032, 14724, 16959, 12821, 8065, 22426, 1134, 25182, 872, 15097, 9588, 19250, 19536, 18359, 19626, 23885, 21788, 9853, 25498, 15648, 10976, 11901, 6206, 14762, 11815, 699, 14645, 19176, 9910, 1365, 22400, 1490, 14527, 10155, 1533, 4120, 19180, 2288, 24104, 18456, 899, 1136, 470, 22720, 1672, 7507, 14250, 24854, 6792, 16093, 15731, 23641, 4169, 19934, 20573, 13881, 19791, 6650, 16415, 8925, 2738, 24000, 8152, 12436, 13143, 926, 9235, 1752, 10750, 4549, 16250, 6592, 4473, 7277, 22621, 17692, 16995, 4035, 16971, 12381, 16476, 6988, 7854, 23044, 16978, 22819, 11159, 19550, 11400, 23654, 12206, 25449, 17252, 3320, 21943, 10425, 13041, 3354, 25132, 7411, 13699, 7026, 5790, 6045, 13065, 19717, 17805, 20309, 5426, 9522, 15271, 25142, 7934, 4651, 94, 12152, 4761, 11582, 3846, 21039, 24278, 11171, 16019, 15233, 7714, 20281, 2828, 2624, 3552, 285, 22186, 18896, 25238, 20310, 13518, 7260, 17968, 20134, 4142, 18756, 14980, 20943, 58, 8111, 12707, 18321, 9344, 4339, 10758, 9862, 12860, 14906, 8617, 10566, 12389, 1155, 6713, 4418, 21323, 4655, 14874, 12653, 2991, 10216, 24289, 6291, 9695, 4563, 15231, 3379, 6718, 2474, 23717, 12564, 24006, 3976, 11035, 6844, 617, 13511, 19323, 4813, 19522, 4727, 20542, 3920, 17350, 19513, 7488, 10672, 9165, 8128, 293, 18169, 13996, 4382, 12502, 19579, 612, 12527, 5826, 787, 16648, 23657, 23213, 8409, 2295, 22083, 14616, 2574, 3612, 24833, 1734, 3980, 23269, 3386, 8422, 23911, 23675, 2158, 21699, 4356, 12276, 18461, 5094, 9660, 19605, 2006, 14934, 2543, 8903, 491, 8510, 5719, 18491, 17734, 5949, 4458, 18150, 9056, 16757, 7163, 25368, 20497, 17798, 21016, 25045, 14614, 5832, 9226, 9424, 10939, 5059, 2149, 8944, 23779, 7999, 949, 12851, 14936, 4626, 24826, 20022, 10631, 3082, 10698, 21316, 1111, 16805, 17715, 24179, 19482, 5294, 2048, 9532, 20441, 22840, 17890, 10935, 5523, 20611, 1886, 14433, 3492, 18910, 15292 ]
reddit_dump_-Hannibalized
[ [ "You don't need to leave religion to be atheist, depends on the religion though or what you perceive religion to be, Hinduism has many cultural aspects and philosophical aspects. I am Hindu atheist. There could be ideas (in any religion) you might enjoy but not necessarily think they are true or something you should practice.\n\nI liked certain ideas in Upanishad how God is defined and different ideas are presented, about brahman and jagat being mithya, about maya etc. I like many mythological stories and Mahabharata and approach it as any literature. Considering an idea as interesting is not equal to believing them as set in stone.\n\nI am a bengali and like the festive aspect of Durga puja and the many good food specially Kalipuja special mutton bhog. That doesn't mean I believe Durga/Kali exist as gods or the stories behind them are true :) I like some aspects they represent like <PERSON> as strength or <PERSON> in art and education.\n\nAgain it all boils down to what you consider being part of a certain religion means to you. I like many cultural, philosophical aspects of Hinduism while pretty much aware of the darker aspects, fanaticism etc. And the superstitious baggage that comes with religious-cultural mix. Like taboo on menstruation to begin.", "994" ], [ "Totally true, I have seen very highly educated people pursuing phd/post doctorate in core science subjects in American universities while pointing out to women they are impure for menstruation, following those at home, fasting for wellbeing of husband and children and making their daughter follow those menstruation rules. Because 'you never know what will happen', 'my mother always told do this', 'if it has been followed for years then must have a reason' or maybe to blend in and social approval ?", "772" ], [ "Indian here. What we do is cook a lot of food on the weekends and during the use do top ups. They freeze very well so not much hassle. Also we have developed a lot of fast techniques like the ones I use when cooking for my family check here - The key is prepping and following a particular order and knowing how much time each step takes. I can't think of eating anything less than rice + daal + 21-2 veggie dishes + one non veg dish + sides like papad/salad/raita. In USA my kitchen is really easy to work in. [_URL_0_](_URL_1_)\n\nIn India - everyone I know have maids, I had too - one for cooking and other for non-cooking works ( washing dishes, cleaning, washing clothes, dusting etc.) The kitchens aren't very comfortable so best to use hired labour.. chopping veggies, cleaning and prepping are very elaborate in Indian cooking, after the maids do the prepping cooking is easy peasy.\n\nContrary to some popular belief, many of those who make these elaborate meals love to do it, they take pride and pleasure serving a huge meal with several side dishes and condiments, it's a labour of love and act of showing love.", "967" ], [ "Usually in many restaurants, entrees come with rice or a choice between rice/simple veg or jeera pilaf/ some Indian bread..\n\nOrder additional Naans.\n\nA traditional thali is complete when you eat -- > rice and or chapati + dal + veggie stir fry + veggie curry + fritters + non veg items (1-2).. This is minimum bengali thali.\n\nBut in restaurant you may want to order less, one veg main-dish, one non-veg main-dish, one daal and additional Naan if Naan isn't complementary. Talk to the server if they have a set thali which they are ready to mix-n-match for you ? Usually if you order more, they are ready to do a jugaad ( some arrangement to seal the deal)", "967" ], [ "Ok, so my bilingual LO said almost nothing till 2 (very limited, knew most shapes and colors but no mama dada) then had a vocabulary explosion at around 2.2. I was worried and was checking with the paediatrician and also at PAT etc. resources, in person tests etc. All of them said that his development otherwise is fine so just expose him to more conversations. For me, I saw it might depend even on weather, like when he turned 2 it was peak winter, as soon as we could take him outside he very quickly strated learning 'flower' ;squirrel' etc.\n\nIf you are saying talking as in proper conversations with exchange of sentences then that happened much much later\n\nHe had another major vocabulary explosion between 2.8 months and now at 3.1 - from words-phrases to proper sentence (both languages) and being able to do a conversation.", "902" ], [ "Colorado ? we like Boulder, Manitou springs area a lot.\n\nIf distance isn't a problem at all then Grand Canyon area there are lots to see / Yellowstone.\n\nWith 2 y.o. it's easier than at 3 !\n\nFrom Iowa beaches aren't close but try Lake Superior, we did North shore drive in May and it was fun, my kiddo was 1.5 yo. I can share a shore drive map (Duluth to up north or to east), lots of interesting things to do.", "273" ], [ "your discourse is extremely trollish, what do you think atheists would think about idol worship ? Of course they don't believe there is anything divine about the idol. But many/some of us still enjoy the festival and respect the symbolisms behind every idol or they may just admire the artistic part of a particular idol. Many bengalis are atheists, that doesn't stop us from organising Durga puja, and have a celebration around something that symbolises a mother's homecoming, strength etc. And the food of course (who doesn't like soshti mutton roll), new clothes and karaoke.\n\nIf you want to meditate, do that. If you think an idol helps you concentrate fine...What exactly do you want to know from an atheist (apart from trolling).. none of us believe there is anything divine/ higher power/mystic about any of those exercises.", "943" ], [ "The series undoubtedly boasts of superior writing, imagination, style and originality.\n\nI doubt how valid the comparison is though, there isn't any absolute scale. It will be a disservice to both the versions. Silence of the lambs is a direct adaptation of the novels, it is well made and started a genre of it's own. Is that what you mean by superior ? Because I watched Silence in the 1990s, when it felt amazing, but with successive rewatches it feels ok, not earth shattering. While 1979 alien feels amazing in every rewatch, I love that genre so I had checked so many movies to match Alien and hardly anything ever came close. Sorry I am digracing from the main question - So I watched the series much later and wow I should admit I have hardly seen this level of storytelling in any format. Every rewatch is rewarding and sheds light on something I haven't noticed earlier, it's a much better adaptation of the source material imo.\n\nSilence did the job of making the franchise famous, but if we are talking about quality, style and superiority of ideas, Hannibal fares better. Let's not forget Hannibal got 3X13 episodes to be able to do that, so that's there too.", "60" ], [ "> Science isn’t really fake my friend. It’s objective, but incomplete.\n\nby fake I mean stuff some people say to explain religious practices. I gave examples - 'menstruating women emitting negative energy' is not science, it is about misquoting science and sounding scientific. It is a calculated move to fool gullible people.", "569" ], [ "My God, I didn't notice this - \n\n & #x200B;\n\n > The bromance didn't feel as plausible as <PERSON> and <PERSON>'s almost father-daughter like relationship in Silence.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nIn both the cases, <PERSON> is a mentor-therapist. **And in both the cases, the relationship is also erotic-romantic and all pervasive,** while <PERSON> goes the extra mile and could show the entire arc.\n\nCurious, why you feel <PERSON>'s arc less dramatic and <PERSON>-Hannibal less plausible ? I think you have missed the pillars of their relationship as in <PERSON> carrying an inner darkness and <PERSON> helping him to be more self aware through macabre therapy in season-1 which turns more familial, romantic, raw and intimate (as well as violent) as the show progresses.\n\nI just think you watched Silence carefully while you didn't watch the series too attentively, missed most of the inner layers of their characters, it is a tough one to get into sure. In this light I am not sure about your comparison.", "494" ], [ "Thanks for reminding - kundali, astrology, performing pujas to dispel bad omen, abiding to caste. So many people I know abide by caste system in marriage and social life, would perform rituals to negate effects of kundali mismatch. \n\nAnd then there is <PERSON> ( who had joined a college to be an architect) visited x number of temples to nullify manglik issues before marriage.", "384" ], [ "Oh did it ? It wasn't my intention. I think it goes without saying the audience of the post are people who are struggling to grasp the idea of curries. It is superfluous for someone who is very well versed with Indian cooking/ cooks eats everyday. Like I mentioned, I wrote it for those confused about curries wanting to learn to cook / understand or just know. And this is open forum, I would invite Indian food experts to fill in details and further information. \n\nSounds like you are really expert at cooking indian food, would look forward to your posts and comments.", "530" ], [ "I think it could be the braising, frying techniques and less to do with ratios. The frying, stirring, braising steps are often quite intense in Indian food compared to subtle sauteing done in many western recipes, and the cooking done in woks adds to intensity. I would suggest follow videos of cooking by India based chefs. \n\n\nRestaurants often cook with a lot of oil which caramalises the ingredients to give a sharp taste, and cooks on a low heat for several hours. And restaurants tend to double cook, and double temper dishes.. so It could be about what you are comparing with, the restaurant food isn't always a great reference of what a particular home cooked indian food should taste like.", "740" ], [ "1/4 of a large onion when made into a paste is quite pungent. And extra 1/4th is being added sliced if you notice. Tomatoes aren't traditionally used in Indian cuisine, I use it sparingly. Aldo note the marinade had spices. I can't think of adding any more than 1/2 of a large onion to 1 kg chicken. Maximum I can add another quarter or so if I need to make it richer. \n\nMy homestyle curries are well homestyle and mild and healthy. In our family we have always cooked in this way, with some adjustments like tomatoes were never traditionally used. You are free to turn the spice quotient up as per your taste. I never follow recipe ratios and quantities when it comes to Indian food most of them have exorbitant amount if oil and spices which aren't fit for home cooking ( my standard of course) \n\nAgain, my post is a discussion and not a recipe.. it is a loose guide and range of ingredients mentioned where people can develop their freestyle indian recipes :)\n\nIndian recipes vary a lot family to family individual to individual.", "530" ], [ "1kg of meat, will call for multiple (2-3) onions and like 2-4 tomatos\n\n\n.That is something I won't do at all for just a kg meat! You are free to do that as per your taste. Although I won't personally recommend. IMO that kind of quantity will overpower the dish, would strip it away from subtle flavour of all spices and would be unhealthy.\n\nFor mutton, you may need more spices though and I should add a note for that in my post.", "324" ], [ "To everyone who is wondering about amounts, you can adjust as per your taste. I didn't share any particular recipe but a broad structure where you can develop your own. The post is a discussion post mainly. My quantities are as per the traditional flavor profile of my family, we put a lot of emphasis on health and don't believe in overpowering dishes with spices. I keep adjusting different spices to come up with different variations. Like I like coriander so often add whole coriander seeds to my curry base paste, you can dial up the quantity of one or two ingredients and you will be surprised that you get a new flavor. For a yogurt based curry, I would add more yogurt, for ginger based curry more ginger and so on..\n\nI never follow recipes closely, rather check what spices are must add and what are must not add/ which spices dominate. That is a good way of doing indian recipes. I Never follow quantities of spices, oils etc. It's ok if you do.\n\n\n I added a note in my post for mutton and lamb : sorry I had missed it completely. Mutton and lamb are strong smelling meant and would call for 1.5-2 times the spices. Check the note if interested.", "530" ], [ "Onions are sugar. Beyond a quantity I personally won't use it. Vegetable by default doesn't mean healthy (or unhealthy), depending on quantity it may become unhealthy, and would also depend on what you are eating it with - other dishes, condiments, carbs. Too much onion also is heavy for the stomach/digestion and note that the entire thing is bhuno/fried in oil.\n\n**I keep repeating - add your desired amount, my post is not a recipe neither. meant for gatekeeping.** It explains a process and approach to develop your own freestyle Indian (meat) curry.", "956" ], [ "> but they all have one thing in common: the belief in a god (or in multiple gods).\n\nActually hinduism isn't very specific about it. Hinduism doesn't call for belief in God as a requirement, and many of it's philosophies question God.\n\nAt the same time it has a pantheon. Basically all schools of thoughts - agnosticism, atheism, polytheism is a part of Hinduism and Hindu way of life is about choosing your path from any of those. \n\nSpecially the initial philosophies in Ved, Upanishads. And neither dogmatic. Sadly an extremist is an extremist and is concerned more with the dogmas which developed in the later ages than the philosophy of the religion.", "129" ], [ "Hinduism is not about divine command, there are some but not all. Hinduism is a body of different schools of thoughts and way of life along with some pantheons and then someone sprinkled dogmas and gatekeeping. It was very different from organised religion as is known in the west with a few books with command from God, prophets.\n\nBut the way it's now good luck trying to tell that to an average Hindu driven mad by extremist idealogies.", "129" ], [ "I am sorry for the confusion, I was supposed to be sharing measurements in lb not kg. I use 1/2 an onion for 1.5 lb chicken. I make this mistake between metric and US system, jetlagged and whatever no excuses. \n\nBut you re right, I tend to make lighter curries and easy on onion garlic. I actually wrote higher proportion for this recipe than I use at home. \n\nReally sorry for the confusion. I have edited my post, I wrote kg by mistake.", "455" ], [ "Correction - I was thinking in lb and wrote kg. I buy in lb in US. Very sorry for this mistake !! \n\nFor upto 1.5 lb I use half an onion or less at home, I tried to write higher proportions for this one. I try not to use tomatoes. Though I don't exactly double the amount of onion for double meat.. since onion paste is quite strong I increase quantity carefully.", "783" ], [ "About onions though we have agree to disagree, onions are sugary and there can be done health factor when sauteed or eaten raw. When cooked thoroughly - the paste is fried with oil on a high flame, the paste you are left with isn't particularly healthy in any sense. When used too much, It makes a lot of people gassy, can have acidity. \n\n\nPeople with diabetes or those watching their diet should be careful too.", "530" ], [ "Ok. \n\nTempering means heating oil and putting selected spices typically used for tempering and frying them for 2-3 minutes or more till they are tender and flavourful. Tempering can be done at two stages.\n\n1. At the beginning, heat oil, add spices then add the main ingredients ( like meat/ potatoes or whatever you want to cook) .. \n\n2. Tempering at the end is where we do it in a separate small pan and We add this concoction to the prepared daal/curry/ chutney. At home I usually do second tempering for daal and south indian dishes but many restaurants do it for regular dishes to enhance flavor. The rule of tempering varies across regions.\n\n\n\n3. What is used in tempering ? Depends on the dish. For daal/lentils these are common- cumin/ mustard / asafetida / tomatoes / onion - garlic - ginger etc. Any combination of that, for south indian food curry leaves are added. Sometimes garam masala is added in some tempering specially meat. \n\n\nFor my regular daal, I do tempering at end by adding the oil spice mixture to boiled lentils. Same for regular chutney. In many other dishes, the lentil or curry is already spiced, and the second tempering adds more flavor rendering a richer taste. \n\n\n\nNot sure if it helped ! You can find recipes that use hing. Like Roghan Josh/ daals / many vegetable curries. I am not aware of it's usage on fish dishes.", "324" ], [ "Thoroughly disappointed with my dark <PERSON>. I felt the author was just riding the tide of a hot topic and never went any deeper beyond Sensationalization. Though it might not be the intention, sometimes it feels like a badly written erotica. The books never goes beyond shock value, doesn't deserve any of the hype it has got.", "1010" ], [ "**Finished** \\- My dark <PERSON>\n\nThoroughly disappointed with my dark <PERSON>. I felt the author was just riding the tide of a hot topic and never went any deeper beyond Sensationalization. Though it might not be the intention, sometimes it feels like a badly written erotica. The books never goes beyond shock value, doesn't deserve any of the hype it has got.\n\n**Still** **reading**\n\nSolo by <PERSON> ( love the style, enchanting, lyrical )\n\n**Started** **reading**\n\nThere there\n\nMexican Gothic", "1010" ], [ "**fiction**\n\n\\-Three men in a boat\n\n\\-House in the cerulean sea\n\n\\- any of your comfort reads, mine include hound of the Baskervilles\n\n**comics**\n\nAdventures of Tintin\n\n**Non** **fiction**\n\nHow to be idle\n\nPacking for Mars\n\nBrief history of time and similar books diver my attention to big mysterious questions and detaches me from reality.\n\nbooks about food.\n\nHindu philosophy (I am agnostic-atheist, somewhere there)", "540" ], [ "I am confused are you making garam masala or a curry powder ?\n\nI dry roast these - cinnamon, green and black cardamoms, cloves, black peppers, a little cumin. Sometimes a hint of mace and fennel. Then grind to a coarse powder and keep it in a jar. The aroma lasts for 1 month at least if properly used.\n\nIdeally cinnamon, green and black cardamoms, cloves, black peppers and bay leaf are considered 'garam masala', maybe even cumin, sha jeera (caraway) and fennel, when you add other ingredients it becomes your own curry powder :) bay leaf should ideally be kept whole for better flavour and not ground in the powder.\n\nBut I guess the definition varies from region to region and family to family. I am <PERSON> and I shared our garam masala.", "794" ], [ "just use less oil and chillies in any recipe. Also don't consider any written recipe set in stone, the quantity should be as per your choice and taste.\n\nyou can check my posts\n\n[_URL_4_](_URL_0_)\n\n[_URL_5_](_URL_1_)\n\n[_URL_2_](_URL_3_)\n\n\\---\n\n**The most simple curry** ? I lb chicken marinated overnight with lime juice from1 lime /yogurt 3 tbsp, homemade garam masala powder 1 tsp.\n\nThen heat 1 tsp oil in a wok, temper with whole garam masala ( 1/2 inch cinnamon, 2 pods cardamom, 2-3 cloves, 1 dry red deseeded chilli, 1 bayleaf) - add 1/2 large chopped onion + ginger garlic fresh paste 2 tsp - fry with 2 tsp salt till onion is light brown and wilted, add 1/2 -1 chopped tomato, add 1-2 tsp turmeric, 1 tsp cumin, 1 tsp coriander. stir and mix your meat, cook till meat is opaue or till it is lightly browned. Add water (as much gravy you want), adjust salt, sugar and cook chicken till done (usually 30 mins). If you want thicker curry then instead of adding chopped tomatoes add a paste of tomatoes and 1.5 tbsp soaked cashew nuts/almonds.\n\nthis is the homestyle everyday chicken gravy, play around with spices and ingredeints, can add paste of spinach and coriander for green gravy etc.\n\n\\---\n\nI use 1 tsp oil for any recipe of chicken (apart from biriyani which cannot be made without ghee and oil) for 1 lb chicken. Use bone in thighs and legs for best flavour.", "324" ], [ "You really don't need, and you can use your own quantity no matter what recipe you are following. In Indian dishes one needs to take care of the frying, tempering process well.. that is more important than what qty of oil or spices you are using. Remember to temper oil by putting your tempering spices till they are aromatic ( and they change colour ) which can take 1-3 mins depending on your flame and type of oil. And remember to fry you curry base well till they wilt and look somewhat like a coarse porridge, and they should change color.", "324" ], [ "Oh well Jackfruit is an Indian fruit-vegetable :D The ripe fruit cannot be used in cooking, the young fruit has a slight meat like texture and taste, and takes on the taste of the gravy. In India I used to get it anywhere raw in the market, in USA mostly canned or if lucky then in asian stores. _URL_0_\n\nI think mushroom will work fine for you.", "530" ], [ "Most Indian curries don't need any dairy, some southern Indian recipes use coconut milk. But most of the stuff is made without milk or coconut milk - from the rest of India which is 3/4th India.\n\nActually it's strange question because curries don't usually need milk :D\n\ncheck bengali recipes, Punjabi, basic Indian curries. If there is use of yogurt in marination then replace it with lemon juice. Skip malai, they aren't a major step.", "559" ], [ "I am not sure what do you mean by garam masala :) Curious are you Indian ? I am Indian and cook Indian food everyday, speaking from that knowledge.. no offence meant. Garam masala is just not any spice powder but special spice powder to add richness to dishes. I think you are confusing the definition. These are considered garam masala - Cinnamon, cardamom, cloves, black pepper... it can stretch to include cumin, star anise, fennels, mace and caraway seeds for some recipes/ some regions. You can use them whole or ground to a powder, bay leaf is used with garam masala.\n\nFenugreek, coriander, nigella seeds, mustard seeds are strictly not a part of garam masala family of spices. Nigella seeds are used for stir frying in some parts of India (like where I come from) also for making Indian pickles and likewise specific uses.\n\nUsually dishes where you use nigella seeds, garam masala isn't added. These aren't flavours that go together.\n\nFor understanding Indian spices and cooking process you can check these -\n\n[_URL_1_](_URL_2_)\n\n[_URL_3_](_URL_0_)", "530" ], [ "Yes some of us do dislike the word but most of us don't take offence. \n\nYou can call it your own masala concoction or masala powder :) though it's difficult to have a single concoction which can work for several recipes. You can have a few - like garam masala powder ( actually many Indians prefer using homemade garam masala powder), sambar masala, North Indian masala mix - which can combine garam masala with cumin, coriander, red chillies. Then you make your own Biriyani masala, bisibellebhat masala etc.", "530" ], [ "I forgot all about it - Hilsa biriyani is a thing in bengali/Bangladeshi cuisine. My mother made Hilsa pulao and it's a traditional recipe, there is a biriyani version in Bangladesh.\n\nSindhi Biriyani is something I heard about, have anyone had ?\n\nThere's Parsi berry pulao or zersek pulao.\n\nIf you stretch your geography then you can look into the cousins and forefathers of Biriyani - from Persia and Central asia - I love the Uzbek Osh ( Lamb meat + spices + carrots + rice + chickpeas and herbs.).. I ate it at Uzbek restaurant in Canada, it's bland for the Indian palate and would work well with beef because the spices aren't enough to work on lamb or mutton. I had recreated it at home with mutton and more spices as well as beef with traditional osh style spices.\n\nIranian rice dishes are amazing, check rice tahdig with potatoes at the bottom of the pan, it has different versions - like biriyani rice is layered with saffron, herbs, meat with additional ingredients like berries etc. I had made tahdig and it's a hit amongst kids for the crunchy brown bottom layer of saffron rice and potatoes.\n\nWe need a thread for rice dishes :)", "738" ], [ "Get a wok !!! A chinese style wok works fine and if you can get a kadai nothing like it.\n\n... I have tried many pans while they work the typical everyday curries need a wok to be made. They are not costly (around-25$) , you will get at a south asian/ asian grocery. You will get it in Ontario. Use the lid of your widest pan for cooking, or use foil.\n\nI have a family, we have this set up - a rice cooker since we eat a lot of that, a pressure cooker, a wok, a dutch oven and different sauce pans of different depths and width.", "324" ], [ "That's a nice recipe idea, thx batter fried chillies, gourd flowers and some other veggies are made anyway. \n\nSo many ingredients/dishes that are now considered to be part of a particular cuisines are late introductions. We swear by poppy seeds but they were introduced much later. In bengali food - different types of Taro/kochu is quite ancient, we eat the entire thing from flowers to tubers to stems mostly with garlic and dried fish/ fresh fish heads, and maybe some coconut . Similarly plantain - we eat stem, flower etc.. moringa (flowers, drumsticks), many leafy greens are part of ancient cuisines. \n\nYeah food history is super fascinating !", "530" ], [ "Kolkata and Lucknow versions are actually close, history of Kolkata biriyani is about Awadhi influence, it has a bit of sweetness and distinct attar/ittar essence, 1-2 potatoes and one egg each serving with one big piece of mutton. Ideally never chicken, though it is sold as a cheaper alternative (big difference in cost) At home you can do anything of course. Also Kolkata biryani is not traditionally served with raita.\n\nI ate two versions of Lucknow biriyani, still confused which one is authentic. One had no herbs, one had some herbs. I feel the biriyani I usually have from Shiraaz/ Aminia/Arsalan in Kolkata was greasier (more ghee?) and stronger aroma (saffron+attar+kewra+?), no distinguishable birista while ther recipe uses birista so either it melted or it is added as a paste, there are no sides (raita/gravy) but we ordered extra korma or chaap\n\nI am witness to some biriyani wars though :D at work, we had people from all over India and everyone claiming their biriyani is the best. Someone said bombay biriyani is best and got punched (yes) by a guy who swears by Hyderabadi biriyani.", "738" ], [ "I am now married to someone who just like me is Hindu atheist, he had been a long time friend, we have a kid.\n\n > I like the Santa Claus, and <PERSON>, but I'm atheist so I don't do the religious aspects. But as you said, it might be easier as a guy.\n\nDifficult to say since I don't know inner workings of western families, and western isn't homogeneous. Also, in India I had those freestyle chill groups from work/education. Hope I will figure things out here eventually. Being on the spectrum makes things a little more complicated, but thanks for reading this.\n\nI do participate in Christian festivals, basically any festival.", "710" ], [ "I watched season 3 and after several episodes still missing the hook. Actually I was supposed to start with season 1 but by mistake started with season 3. I felt it's neither here nor there, not much of mystery or suspense, not psychological enough either and then some badly done queerbait. This kind of idea of dark bonding between two people have already been executed by other shows in a much better way. \n\nSince I haven't watched other seasons, are they different ? Is the flavor of the show supposed to be psychological ?", "522" ], [ "Goalondo steamer curry is from Goalondo (or as written in English [Goalanda](_URL_0_) ) upazila in Bangladesh, which was a part of undivided India. The heritage recipe was a (muslim) fishermen's one pot chicken dish made inside fishing boats (the boat referred to as steamer ) and is a popular dish among both India and Bangladesh in both Hindu and non hindu communities.\n\nIt has nothing to do with Goa, which is in Western coast on India.\n\nYou should continue to refer to dishes from Goa as Goan.", "738" ], [ "Hey ! I know OP isn't trying to insult.\n\nAnd, sure every place probably is. Japan must have variations too ! The variation sometimes gets wider if the country is too huge and has different cultural influences, climates, colonial past etc. Like India has several state each speaking a different language (not dialect but each separate language), so it behaves more like the continent of say, Europe ! What I am saying is that the differences are not nuanced it is not like different regions in France/Japan. It will be like generalising all European food, they can be generalised as having less spice though.\n\nExample - someone said yogurt, chutneys, filter coffee represent India. Someone said Idli !! They don't, they represent some regions. The ideal answer should cover different regions and what the representative ingredient is, it's the answers which baffle me. Or start answers with 'from my region in India'..\n\nMost people aren't aware of the stark regional variations, even Indians and in the process many regional cuisines are sidelined.. In this post I am not talking about that at all. In an India-only forum I would definitely have talked about that :)", "738" ], [ "I am not sure where you are from India but definitely the kind who sidelines some regional cuisines, I wasn't insulting OP at all hope I made that point clear.\n\nSo yeah - my generalisation that every Indian household has a variety of spice works then.\n\nBut If you tell me Idli, chutney or yogurt then that's just regional answers. Because most answers would be regional at the end of the day. I take my poppy seed paste very seriously, someone tales their dumplings seriously, someone does <PERSON>.. \n\nAlso you are wrong about the extent of regional variations.", "530" ], [ "You need to marinate meat far longer. The quantity of spices feel seriously low.. like 2 cardamoms ? You need 7-10.. You need way more spices, also did you use onions ? Ideally onions to be fried till brown and made into a paste and added. At least overnight marination is required for meats like mutton. Prepare homemade garam masala powder for additional flavor. Then you need aromatics if you can find - kewra water, mitha attar. Also, you can't make biriyani without saffron.\n\nOne way is to divide the masalas into two sections - one keep them uncooked. Cook the other portion in oil and grind it to a paste. Then mix with mutton. Dry roasted / fried spices have extra flavor. \n\nI know you want to make kachhi biriyani but with mutton it never turns out satisfactory because the meat is strong smelling, I always precook it basically not kachhi anymore but serves my purpose.", "324" ], [ "I like one - steamed chicken breast with a little red chilli bean paste + scallion + ginger + 1 tsp chinese cooking wine + 2 tsp soy sauce + dry soy beans few + ground jasmine rice 1-2 tsp. Adjust salt and sugar as per your taste, 1-3 tbsp water. Steam in air tight container ( I steam in my rice cooker) for 30 mins. Chicken breast cut into chunky but even pieces.", "324" ], [ "Or maybe you are still grappling to understand him and was expecting something specific that didn't work out ? <PERSON> had always repressed a dark side which is his true self and <PERSON> is helping him become more self aware and accept who he is. Season 3 first half shows the struggle of both men trying to deal with each other's influence in the aftermath of Mizumono. I can understand <PERSON> can be frustrating with his constant back and forth, at the same time his conflict is reasonable. \n\nSeason 3 uses several creative ideas, goes experimental with art and art being subjective, parts of season 3 can be subjective. Some sections of Episode 2-5 have pacing issue, they had budget issues too.. the pacing problem goes away from episode 6 onwards. I struggled with some arcs like Chiyoh and Lecter Palace.. while I appreciate the significance, I found it not compelling enough. \n\nS3e1 is one of the best episodes ever imo.", "13" ], [ "I honestly have only made mutton kachhi biriyani once and didn't like because I have issues with the smell of mutton, I observed the strong smell doesn't go untill I am cooking it then putting in dum. If you aren't particular of making it in kachhi style then better to do pakki biriyani with mutton. \n\nThis is a good recipe for chicken kachhi biriyani - you can work around it as you wish _URL_0_\n\n( Note for the recipe - I cook rice with twice the amount of spices indicated and chicken marinated overnight, also I cook the rice less. I also use some extra ingredients like mitha attar and 6-10 alubukharas. ) \n\nTo answer you question\n\n1) biriyani is not an easy recipe, you will only get it with practice so relax. \n\n2) for spicier rice you have to boil it with more spices - like 1.5-twice the amount indicated in this recipe. Put spices in a slice pouch or diy cheesecloth potli. Ideally potli (6 cloves + 1 inch cinnamon + 6-8 cardamom+ 1 star anise + 1 tsp caraway + some mace + 6-8 black peppers ) put a bayleaf and 1 tsp ghee in rice with 1/2 inch ginger. \n\n3) use a good store bought hyderabadi ( or whichever style you are making) biriyani masala to be used over and above your masalas ( the recipe I shared covers all this and what masala to buy. I use Shaan menoni biriyani masala for Kolkata style biriyani. \n\n4) use herbs ( mint, coriander, saffron milk etc) and birista when layering rice, the top should have a layer too. All this is explained in recipe.\n\n5) sprinkle biriyani masala while layering for extra flavor, sprinkle 1/4 tsp in every layer along with regular ingredients like saffron and herbs. \n\n\n\nProblems you may face - first time you may get overcooked rice or on the contrary - burnt bottom layers. Next time you may have to adjust amount if liquid or rice cooking time to take care of these issues. Usually with chicken there isn't a lot of problem.\n\n\nYou may try the same recipe for mutton with say 20-25% more spices and 1-1.5 day marination. Try smaller pieces for mutton to facilitate cooking\n\nBong eats has a nice mutton pakki biriyani recipe but it's not the spicy style but aromatic style. Check pakki mutton hyderabadi biryani recipes if you want the herbs and spices.\n\n\n\nEdited to add - I heard this earlier but may not be your case. Some people think kachhi biriyani is authentic method, pakki isn't. This myth originated because some restaurants cheat and mix precooked fully cooked rice with fully cooked curry meat and serve it as pakki biriyani. This is their dishonesty ! Pakki biriyani is 70-80% cooked meat + yakhni+ 70%-80% cooked rice layered well with spices and put into dum the same way as kachhi but needs less dum time.", "324" ], [ "I was diagnosed in my late twenties, I had severe unexplained work related anxieties for which I approached a counsellor in a local well known private hospital (By that time I had accepted the fact that I don't fit in and I am ok with it) . I approached someone (India) and they shared the diagnosis privately, there is a lot of stigma attached to mental health, still it's fine if it was just depression or anxiety but this is not something I can talk about.\n\nI have huge problems understanding unspoken social code, gender roles etc. I am non conformist, atheist, have few very close friendships, enjoy my time alone or with a close friend/partner only, don't feel any need to socialise etc. Simple social expectations rattled me like you aren't expected to join a celebration or a ritual if you are on your period etc.. just never accepted anything. In a way, I think ASD gives me a different worldview and I think it's not bad.\n\nThe worst memory is how rude kids were when I was little, may be not intentionally. Kids understand who is different and they avoid, bully.. it was the worst part.", "652" ], [ "> rajma and brisket on a tortilla\n\nI know some people who love Indian-Mexican combo like my spouse does. I have made for him, I don't quite like it myself. Personally I like some Mexican food, but some just feels like an odd combination of Indian food like rice with avocado etc inside a tortilla feels like eating rice with roti.", "530" ], [ "You raised avocado.. so my son loves them. I tried some mix and matches, when you mash it up as in guacamole with some more spices it can act like a chutney with fried items too. We eat quite a bit of fish, so any stuffed or normal fried fish/ rava fried. In chutney form I have served with cheela/ rice etc. \n\nMole sauces are pretty much like some Indian curry sauce with of course difference in flavour. I haven't explored much of Mexican food beyond the obvious and on lookout for more. I am obsessed with some regional Chinese - Sichuan food rn, to the extent of trying to marry some Indian veggies with it.", "530" ] ]
314
[ 9561, 22633, 24016, 22202, 17114, 11230, 16605, 17755, 23584, 20843, 16576, 15088, 18956, 10278, 20549, 15038, 22127, 18457, 8705, 5473, 1957, 16527, 22750, 20954, 22232, 15659, 15298, 3923, 23276, 22870, 16774, 14040, 21987, 17721, 15763, 2994, 1679, 20314, 22922, 24319, 17313, 15225, 10511, 24347, 1319, 21507, 9979, 12492, 10521, 8263, 16833, 16181, 6487, 4212, 20448, 14149, 7189, 24882, 24322, 2612, 20208, 19431, 4828, 19866, 14886, 21777, 4935, 4700, 15539, 22231, 11384, 107, 16555, 22950, 5410, 21513, 1298, 13556, 18060, 1107, 12653, 11631, 24498, 7379, 8348, 483, 22937, 7090, 24822, 3674, 20232, 17189, 15112, 23064, 19303, 24150, 22035, 15901, 11176, 25464, 12163, 20916, 13529, 9147, 21994, 1886, 297, 15541, 21101, 21133, 14927, 4270, 8876, 12339, 13143, 18366, 3438, 3324, 12735, 20075, 19929, 19331, 20474, 15756, 25114, 16909, 11035, 19136, 5841, 18347, 20318, 4296, 8606, 22700, 19798, 23731, 19325, 17080, 20062, 5218, 12176, 19853, 25238, 24736, 23833, 19271, 24606, 2209, 22863, 9394, 16065, 15937, 17893, 7281, 5619, 23378, 11656, 24905, 6343, 17640, 23911, 21287, 22032, 15770, 14616, 25182, 6707, 10758, 5774, 4108, 9653, 18417, 13728, 11882, 16484, 13181, 6185, 15467, 17922, 11776, 16995, 21889, 23138, 12866, 16601, 23799, 15580, 2674, 5475, 21530, 17928, 7376, 25536, 6183, 3553, 23802, 21634, 968, 2068, 15322, 15543, 18070, 6548, 12569, 3609, 25367, 22398, 8455, 4051, 15544, 13877, 13966, 22858, 12259, 25399, 10288, 21411, 24923, 13174, 10887, 17661, 1487, 7806, 15183, 23641, 5102, 10013, 12527, 10216, 10538, 17268, 4442, 9619, 15955, 22400, 9346, 10537, 6744, 6565, 15395, 1939, 19069, 1734, 12746, 2305, 1645, 2158, 23708, 11500, 8877, 20956, 7649, 17120, 1951, 3778, 24808, 9655, 11223, 11871, 14915, 4530, 1127, 13855, 11298, 6223, 2228, 2435, 19784, 7018, 23636, 16462, 22778, 17259, 13246, 6854, 16223, 20187, 21599, 7228, 4641, 19764, 18171, 22335, 15494, 25391, 6713, 4162, 4677, 21870, 21173, 18010, 17916, 9062, 19261, 14536, 12511, 16174, 12366, 22337, 21265, 4906, 20212, 527, 6070, 17470, 12502, 23050, 25068, 21612, 22265, 860, 2587, 17290, 24556, 9795, 19787, 18444, 9195, 15355, 13993, 11836, 8485, 22128, 6358, 21943, 5440, 19385, 25045, 2837, 12471, 24749, 21579, 24475, 744, 21028, 25129, 22925, 16599, 19503, 7970, 11963, 5508, 16624, 5778, 4579, 6967, 4295, 1136, 10410, 11387, 22580, 6160, 23170, 8266, 6788, 19911, 17557, 16455, 20161, 22451, 23750, 1551, 10363, 20471, 9266, 19225, 587, 703, 23765, 5070, 13001, 5805, 3943, 5305, 19632, 19887, 2527, 17095, 11967, 13840, 20292, 9520, 20821, 18921, 2288, 14499, 23814, 22804, 24446, 5859, 8128, 14580, 15046, 15690, 24778, 11728, 11800, 22145, 17113, 2111, 9958, 24799, 4376, 21263, 13408, 3652, 2462, 16355, 8312, 1113, 18540, 9862, 2858, 24214, 15903, 19251, 17613, 25059, 13923, 13399, 11299, 10729, 13746, 22070, 25065, 21256, 535, 18594, 7715, 17022, 14545, 12825, 9023, 4168, 14576, 20738, 17188, 15917, 10886, 15648, 20193, 365, 12547, 21415, 1370, 296, 1603, 25120, 11454, 20826, 13785, 11276, 16904, 20936, 24100, 5462, 19968, 14752, 22968, 16626, 25475, 15643, 20654, 10425, 11901, 14622, 18280, 11381, 18055, 6842, 3572, 327, 785, 24044, 18080, 13310, 7805, 16386, 22866, 12715, 4273, 7377, 15550, 6927, 12041, 11358, 22647, 9235, 25405, 22691, 5537, 10828, 8716, 9707, 6502, 18202, 13641, 10360, 8569 ]
reddit_dump_-HarryManback-
[ [ "Can't imagine how difficult it must be for our black and brown 'pedes who dare think for themselves. \n\nMan, could that be a powerful documentary. Wish someone made one months ago. Family, friends, the election, BLM, and social media. Just had the idea, could still work now but damn it could be good.\n\nStay strong friend. You know who you are inside and why others are like this.", "633" ], [ "We need to start really giving a shit here because this is a power play to thrust Marxism on even younger children without parental consent.\n\nThey're teaching elementary school kids about trans, white guilt, pro Islam, <PERSON> bad, etc in public schools. Making trans bathrooms is a huge step into normalizing this for young children who will then see their parents as \"bigots\" if they tell their kids how they're against it. When it becomes normal at school, teachers preaching it's out of being nice and inclusive, and peers accepting it'll drive the wedge because the message sure sounds nice on the surface. \"My/your parents are crazy and wrong for not accepting everyone\".\n\nWhether you agree or not, clearly this shouldn't be the standard in public schools in elementary or Jr. High where parents have no choice other than a private school. *Maybe* in High School there's an argument to be made but even still.", "292" ], [ "Gender roles long predate anything resembling society. Don't understand this thought. If anything it's modern society that challenges and dilutes these roles. There's a reason why men are stronger and can track fast moving objects (hunting/threats) with better spacial awareness (find way home) while women are more empathetic (child raising) and can distinguish between shades of color (gathering) better.\n\nAlmost as if we evolved to become human and biologically posses differing characteristics to play our roles in the game of survival and procreation.", "490" ], [ "Top story...\n\n > Oscars controversy shines light on lack of opportunity for minority artists \n\nFew down and holy fuck...\n\n > Immigrant communities in fear, <PERSON> administration tries to quell nerves - stronger enforcement actions against **immigrants without documentation**\n\n**ILLEGALS!**\n\n > Researching religions leads one woman to identify as a \"Catholic Muslim\" - People sometimes ask <PERSON>, \"How are you Muslim if you're Mexican? I don't understand.\" \"Islam is for everybody\", she says. -- related stories... Muslim teen hopes to help diversify emojis with a hijab version and Muslim girl wants to knock out old boxing rules to wear hijab in the ring \n\nNope, no Islamafication at all...\n\nMOST LOVED THIS MONTH\n\n > Border wall is a recipe for ecosystem disaster, park conservationists say \n\n > Immigrants march to protest <PERSON>'s new policies \n\nWow, no agenda at all and that's just the front page on a random check. Unreal. Sadly so many have no choice but to send their kids to publics to be exposed to this shit. Thanks for upsetting me and the link lol.", "799" ], [ "He knows everything we know and so much more on a great many things. Not sure why this is a surprise. People asked <PERSON>'s First Member whether he knew about <PERSON> and his orgs then got excited when he confirmed that he did (<PERSON> mentioned <PERSON> by name in 2 (3?) of the 3 debates). He's probably knew about him 20 years ago and he's known <PERSON> is a pedo and <PERSON> flew with him a long time ago too.\n\nJust find if funny and rather strange sometimes how we wonder if <PERSON> knows of this or that.", "504" ], [ "100% a dereliction of duty. You are elected to represent you constituents, the American people, not foreign nationals. \n\n > 18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or **adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States** or elsewhere, **is guilty of treason**\n\nWhile technically not \"enemies\", couldn't one make the case? Resources stolen from American citizens taken (or given) by foreign nationals. These same foreign nationals who protest to \"Make America (or California) Mexico Again\". Open sedition by these foreign nationals and organizations like La Raza (among others who side with illegals against <PERSON>/Gov) advocating to overthrow <PERSON>/our Government. Mexican Government encouraging illegals to come to America, says they won't take them back. Cartel and gang members who clearly are enemy combatants/soldiers. \n\nAny legal 'pedes know why Gov officials openly disobeying Federal Law isn't a prosecutable offense (you don't get to choose what laws you obey)? Why isn't this an immediate grounds for dismissal as well? Is there a reason it's not?", "733" ], [ "You invite a person into your home and they demand to eat your only steak and drink that top shelf scotch you've been saving because your gracious offer of free frozen pizza and beer wasn't good enough...it's almost as if you'd tell them to leave because they're an asshole.\n\nMotherfuckers, we let them come into the greatest country on Earth from their absolute shitholes and want to make demands of us?", "897" ], [ "Really hate the way the law is written where it sure seems you do have a better case by killing another person instead of shooting into the bush. Cop did so and everyone ran. Threat over.\n\nE.g.: I'm walking down the street late at night and 4 men approach me talking shit. Are they just drunk, are they just having fun trying to scare me, or are they about to try and beat/rob me? I'm fearful of what might be but have no idea yet what's about to happen and by the time I do it might be too late to defend myself. So what do, wait or pull out your CC and start firing? \n\nImo, the best and obvious action is to pull out your gun but not shoot them. Better safe than sorry (insofar as before the threat occurs) which goes for yourself and them in this instance. Killing someone should be a last resort and I just hate the fact it's almost encouraged to shoot first by so many. Perceiving a life threatening situation is open to interpretation and absolutely hate the idea of leaving that up to any ol' idiot to decide in the moment. If I'm dead I don't give a motherfuck if the guy gets convicted. \"Got into a heated argument with a much bigger guy than me and I feared for my life so I shot him.\" Very reasonable chance he wasn't going to actually fight the person. So again, pull gun and it'll be over 99% of the time right that moment. /rant", "1016" ], [ "They're referring to the normal people on the left who were anti-establishment up until Cultural Marxism fully took hold they did a 180 without even realizing it. They'd say they still are I'm sure.\n\nAstounding really just how far it's come in just the past couple years. It's been bubbling underneath the surface for decades but only widely accepted by the \"highly educated\" in education and the elites. Unsure of the catalyst? Social media is what spread the infection so widely in such a short amount of time among the youth to become so widely accepted it seems.", "827" ], [ "Sure but regardless, has zero relevance today considering it's always in reference to \"but but Christians did bad things too\". Along with the very very few attacks carried out by Christians for a cause now some how, for some reason, relates to the overwhelmingly disproportionate terrorist attacks carried out by Muslims throughout the world. Which is why this should always be the main counterpoint if it's brought up. Zero relevance to the modern world of Islamic terrorism.\n\nI'd commend them for their amazing new invasion strategy if the reason wasn't because we're completely cucking our own selves out of altruism. Our ancestors literally can't even.", "293" ], [ "The retards didn't desperately want to go against <PERSON>!? \n\nHoly shit...did <PERSON> fear going up against <PERSON> due to the <PERSON> family deep state ties (imagine that internal battle)? Even after <PERSON> and how terrible <PERSON> is there is no fucking way America elects a third <PERSON>, let alone a low energy Guac bowl merchant.", "469" ], [ "And they'll motherfucking kiss the ring and not mention it when in the room.\n\nThen again I wouldn't be surprised if former ski instructor <PERSON> goes full retard and completely tanks the talks to make some self righteous moral stand...\n\nDid <PERSON> leak <PERSON>'s reporter scandal to make him feel extra weak going into big trade talks? Hmm....", "452" ], [ "> disinformation\n\nWhich would be getting us all to REEEEE this is obviously a hitman hired by <PERSON>/Hillary to make us all look dumb. \n\nHow do people here still not get this? This is the real tactic of alphabet agencies online, they literally want us to latch onto conspiracies and the wilder the better to discredit all of us. Jumping on any and every conspiracy is exactly what they want.", "298" ], [ "Was going to disagree with needing security but he then goes on to explain exactly why it'd be necessary. \n\n<PERSON> lead mob instigator (with others salivating in the crowd to attack I'm sure) along with the subject matters will make the tensions sky high and if JBP dare go against their identity politics in such a hostile atmosphere against, the chances of something awful happening raise exponentially. Just a spark need to ignite that.\n\nOr ya know, some big guys like you (for me) could be there in the front row to defend him against the mod?", "673" ], [ "But that's exactly why the Radical Commie Left has taken near complete control of the West. \n\nLEFTISTS DO NOT COMPROMISE NOR PLAY FAIR! Why the hell do you think the West is in this mess? We play nice, we compromise in good faith. \n\nPolitically and socially inch by inch over decades they laid the foundation and now we're finally seeing the ramifications of the Leftist's Uptopian vision politically and socially (clear evidence for decades actually). Nearly every country in the West is now completely run by the Left (moderate Democrat would be in very conservative party) or infested with it like here. \n\nThis is utter shit advice! Exactly why America's 1A and 2A are being threatened and exactly how other Western countries got disarmed and now they're really clamping down on what \"free speech\" the subjects are allowed to have.", "886" ], [ "No, that's best case scenario given the alternative is they're propagandists waging mass manipulation and social control techniques which literally alters reality. Be it ideology or actual mouthpieces of the Gov Establishment on MSM panels telling you what you should believe. Former <PERSON> aides, former heads of the CIA <PERSON> and <PERSON>, FBI, other life long heavily connected members of the political establishment and the elite.\n\nIt's been clear since the first Iraq war and they haven't stopped since. Undeniable after 9/11. Former Generals and top Establishment officials, the \"top minds\" in geo-political theory, all for show to manipulate favorable public opinion for a war.", "827" ], [ "Funny enough is they were so close to a total Victory but full extremists became their social demand and the social and institutional acceptable norm in just the last 5 years it shocked the masses into waking up to look down at their paved road to Hell. \n\n10-20 more years and it might have been too late (and still is for multiple countries when the \"refugee\" policies really come into full effect) for us in America. \n\nDon't ya love the \"superiority\" of the EU calling on us to give up our guns and free speech? Huh, Iran and all of our enemies want exactly this too. Almost as if outside and inside forces openly want America and everything we stand for to fail. Sick part is how it's not only socially acceptable, political parties and politicians openly support...well, basically destroying their country, culture, and history to make usher in their Commie Uptopian dreams.", "725" ], [ "And the amazing thing is that <PERSON> is 100% anti alcohol and drugs, said he's never done them and yet is not only open enough to understand but will actually do something about it.\n\nHmm, glitch in the Matrix liberals? Feel that cog dis twinge? An old white man billionaire Conservative is going to lay the foundation of full legalization (all states will quickly get in on the new tax revenue) which in turn paves the way for future big changes in reforming drug laws. How long have the cucks wanted this? 8 years of <PERSON>'s and he even had the supermajority but still didn't do shit but yep, just memory hole how <PERSON> didn't do a damn thing to help inner cities nor minorities in America.", "382" ], [ "Sometimes you have to play the game and put on a show to get the people interested. More importantly here, laying the foundation to bring people together on this lava hot topic.\n\nDo you think <PERSON> meeting top experts from blah blah on Prison reform moves the needle at all? Brings us together? No, so you find a better way to pave the road so we can come together on this issue. \n\n<PERSON>/<PERSON> -- > <PERSON> \"in her expert knowledge\" gets <PERSON> to commute the sentence which in turn moves the damn needle putting this issue in the spotlight.\n\n\"Hey you here about <PERSON> and <PERSON>? Crazy and now <PERSON> commutes this black lady's life sentence with the help of <PERSON>? If that's not mind blowing enough did you hear what <PERSON> just told the protesting NFL players and other athletes? He said they should come to him if they personally know of a great injustice done and he'll look into pardoning or commuting their sentence too. <PERSON> says he wants to help and wants to talk with them about these serious issues.\"\n \nNot difficult to follow nor see <PERSON>'s strategy here.", "622" ], [ "I know we're not suppose to sexualize fighters but is it against the rules to sexualize mods here? \n\nI mean that's not what I'm all about haha but I don't want to be banned if taken the wrong way. Its, its just this natural high I get here being around him, like a bee you could say. So much pressure and difficult for me to put into words ya know? Like how would you even go about saying these things to someone without looking crazy? Advice for my friend?", "621" ], [ "And who loves endless self masturbatory hypotheticals? So damn lazy intellectually as is REEEing \"X fallacy\". Shut up and just succinctly make the argument on why it's \"lolz fallacy u lose bro\" if you actually want a chance to persuade someone and/or showcase your intellect. Best way to make your point and make the other look a fool which should be simple for one such as you.", "248" ], [ "Hey now, <PERSON> was also a part time ski instructor who just so happened to be the definition of power, privilege, marketing, running solely on his last name and looks. \n\nBut he's like, dude weed bro and ultra feminist so it's totes okay for him and <PERSON> to only be relevant because of their last names. *waves hands* We are not gaslighting you, hypocrisy is okay when we do it.", "777" ], [ "<PERSON> comparing <PERSON> to <PERSON>, why? <PERSON>'s gameplan is clearly 50%+ setting up pressure to clinch, go against the cage, and take down threats. \n\n<PERSON> throwing haymakers to set up the clinch and also throwing volume kicks to again, put striking pressure on to setup clinch/takedown. No <PERSON> 1-2s that I saw here but...\n\n<PERSON>'s style is comparable to <PERSON> because... umm, why again <PERSON>?", "456" ], [ "### <PERSON> is a LARPING FAGGOT exploiting <PERSON> death\n\nInstead of cleaning up a new comment I'll just [**Link to past comment calling this POS out**](_URL_0_)\n\nCalling it now because it's just so easy to predict, this faggot makes a HUGE claim but you have to just trust him on the proof because it like totes puts his and his legit investigative team in danger of literally being murdered by the Deep State. \"We have the proof, we can tell you but if we showed you we'd all end up dead\"...now please donate to my patreon \"my fellow MAGA Patriots\". \n\nThis \"YUGE REVELATION\" will be nothing I guarantee it and everyone who believes in this cuck and upvoted should answer after this \"MAJOR BREAKING NEWS\". (Check how long I've been here before you REEEEE \"SHILL\" like an idiot)\n\nEither just a pos faggot trying to get famous off this or an obvious disinfo agent making us ALL look bad. \n\nThink not? Ask yourself then why has <PERSON> never once uttered <PERSON> name before or after the election when he's known all along and knows far FAR more than we do? Maybe there's a reason, hmm? Optics are a thing like it or not and I'll go with POTUS here and (ducks at incoming stones thrown) say <PERSON>, call it what you will, 'Conspiracy' is just plain bad optics. Amidst all of this DNC \"hack\"/Muh Russia BS <PERSON> has never mentioned him once and obviously there's reasoning behind it (whatever that may be).", "988" ], [ "Important to leave out the success part because that's why it's the REEE argument of these fools.\n\nIf one thinks it makes America look what, stupid to even try to talk with NK because of the past and because \"well it won't work anyways\"...that's fucking retarded.\n\nOnly a REEEtard would be pissed if <PERSON> tried to denuclearize NK and user in a peaceful future, hopefully. Not trying and unwilling to sit at the table would be retarded. Sure some would've \"savaged\" <PERSON> over this but most who disliked him even wouldn't have over trying diplomacy. \n\nRemember the Iran war scare in the media (hmm, persuasion to accept any Iran deal so no war?) and did all the <PERSON> haters think he shouldn't try a diplomatic solution to avoid war?", "308" ], [ "But he never used the app, never hooked up on it, those who claimed as much were all proven liars.\n\nGreat narrative to push, no? Nope, just a self hating gay because religion just like Christianity would've led him to do. Nothing to do with Islam\n\n[**FBI Has Found No Evidence of Orlando Jihadi’s <PERSON> ‘Secret Gay Life’**]( _URL_0_)\n\nAnd yet to this day there's many who still believe this because that's the narrative immediately pushed hard; even here and if you get your news from Fake News you likely never heard it was all a lie. FBI came out a week or so after to say there's zero evidence.", "646" ], [ "Logic in both but now that I think about it, it's pretty clear. The normalization of every and all degeneracy is the Left's MO so what happens 10-20-50 years from now (look around today)? Next thing you know finding uncle <PERSON>'s robot baby sex doll is no longer horrifying. No biggie, socially acceptable now. \"Oh lil <PERSON>, that's just uncle <PERSON>'s child sex doll. Neat, huh? Now put it back and wash your hands.\"\n\nAs we see in the increasing numbers of kids/young adults who identify as LBGT due to normalization, why wouldn't that be the case here? It becomes more and more accepted in society, everyone knows there's child sex dolls, online forums, porn of it, and so on. Not nearly the same increase sure, but the more socially acceptable it becomes, hard to imagine it wouldn't.\n\n\n\nAnd so if they get this \"outlet\" to simulate but how long until it's no longer enough to satisfy? Roleplaying situations how many times before it would make you more likely to act? That's to say, thinking about doing something horrible is very different from carrying it out for real, and so would this \"prepare\" them to be more likely to follow through? Slowly eroding how evil it really is in their mind by living out their fantasies over and over again for months, years, until it's easier to follow through because you can only fuck a robot for so long.\n\nWho hasn't thought about robbing a bank? Now let's you never thought about going through with it of course but you play a bank robbing video game every night and every night you \"win\". After how many months or years of doing this everyday until it increases the chances you'd actually go through with it? Maybe not a lot and let's say you're still unlikely, but you'd think it would increase the likelihood if your chance arose so to speak.\n\nAnd of course this won't be enough for the Left, soon they'll be promoting more ways to help the poor pedos like a place where they can \"watch\" kids play behind one way glass and then it's more and more, inch by inch, until what then?", "965" ], [ "Eh, correct me if I'm wrong but the '97%' Myth was born by asking ANY AND ALL scientists if they thought it was reasonable to believe man made pollution could affect the climate. \n\n > So you're a scientist studying to cure diseases but have you ever thought about ~~the Coming Ice Age~~ ~~Global Warming~~ \"Climate Change\"? I mean, billions of people means lots of waste dumping into the Environment so that just has to have a negative impact ~~like the Ozone layer burning up killing us all soon because of hairspray~~ long-term, right?\n\n > Yes, well that would make sense but at to what scale and your model is....\n\n\n > OKAY GREAT! We will put you down as an empathetic \"YES\" that in you're SCIENTIFIC OPINION the whole world will die soon! Thanks a bunch!", "269" ], [ "> but, but...we should \"rise above\", eye for an eye makes the whole world blind dontchya know?\n\nYes and with your open eyes glance across to see modern Western civilization has been infiltrated and subverted by the Commie Left in almost every government institution along with the \"influencers\" helped usher in what is and is not socially acceptable. The Social Groundwork laid the past ~20 years (even longer under the surface at Uni among \"intellectuals\") but exponentially accelerated by social media and mass manipulation tactics (CTR/SB among legit Alphabet agency equivalents in nearly every country attempting to influence their own masses or more).\n\nAnd that's exactly why it's come to this, they play a dirty game whether you want to play along in the mud or not. \n\nSuch insane hypocritical ideology would get you rightfully mocked and laughed at just a few years ago but again, with social media and the foundation laid for decades to accept social change as inch by inch the leftist relentlessly move forward.\n\nBeing \"nice\" because why not, non-confrontational, live and let live and \"Muh Principles\" bullshit is EXACTLY why we're here. Mocking and making the Alt Left a complete joke is how you win, they're fucking LOSERS! Not to judge a book but the \"cover\" Leftists display to the world sure is telling when over and over again it's proven.", "965" ], [ "Quality is KEY my fellow pede.\n\nAn Info War we are in and there are so many ways to deceive and infiltrate to control perception inside and out I could probably write a book on how to do it on T_D alone given I've seen it from nearly the beginning. It's obvious if you look. \n\n[**How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations. <PERSON>_)\n\nFar as I know the greatest article on the subject but of no surprise, really. 100 years since <PERSON>'s wrote the book on 'Propaganda' and advanced via the scientific method to do far more than sell cars to men and beauty products to women. Newspapers to TV to now the greatest mass manipulation technology ever created with social media.\n\n\nNotice how there's a few talking points to discredit us? By no accident nor was it when the term \"conspiracy theory\" when it popped up out of thin air to describe those who dared question the official Warren Report (JKF). And it is absolutely by no accident that lizard people, tin foil hat, flat earth, etc etc has now become synonymous with \"conspiracy theorists\". If you dare question you are socially ostracized and also in hopes of others to not question at all for fear of being ostracized and so instead you conform. Deja Vu?", "969" ], [ "\"Why Millions of Part Time Service Jobs are the Future of the lowly American Worker hoping to get by...\" - Brought to you by the Utopian Liberal Dreams project as we've seen such tremendous Liberal Democrat SUCCESS IN Chicago, Detroit, DC, Baltimore, St. Louis, and so many more must I go on with the living Liberal Utopian dreams ALL the poor and working class live with our great leadership.\n\n\"Our decades long Democratically controlled inner cities and the education of those who need our help most has just been amazing, for real trust us. American big cities are all Utopias and especially in California where income equality isn't a thing at all. We've SOLVED IT YOU GUYS BUT GIVE US MORE MONEY AND CONTROL OVER EVERYTHING IN YOUR LIFE!\" - Liberals", "612" ], [ "[162,000 refugees came to Sweden - 494 got jobs](_URL_0_)\n\n[Germany: Of 1 million migrants 54 got high-skill jobs](_URL_1_)\n\nPretty please ignore also the rising crime rates and social tensions that inevitably clash when incompatible cultures that do not assimilate meet, not good so don't say okay...\n\nOh and please don't mention the billions and billions it costs our already over-taxed ~~subjects~~ citizens.\n\nAlso forget the polls that show your own people do not want their country sold out to complete outsiders and have to pay for it no less and if you complain the coppers will be at your door for 'Wrong think\".\n\nYou know what? Let's just keep it really fucking simple okay? If you dare speak out we'll just ruin your life publicly, professionally, and maybe even throw you in jail if you dare speak out against us you...You fucking got that!?", "678" ], [ "Ahh yes, please forget that a HORRIFYING ~15-20% of Western Muslims in a survey OPENLY ADMIT they APPROVE of Jihad against the West, Sharia Law and Islam should DOMINATE America and the World. Not to mention the Pew Poll numbers show the clear majority support Jihad/terrorist attacks against America in countries that are 90%+ Muslim and that Islam should rule the world.\n\nIgnore it all and pay billions every year to increase horrible crimes against your citizens and increase social tensions. Not to mention long term ramifications because \"lol Hanlon's Razor we're totes just stupid and don't know the future impact of our Commie policies, oops\".", "293" ], [ "Almost as if upvoting low effort circlejerks and reposts while strategically downvoting others is obviously the best tactic to use against us. Almost as if it's been happening for many months now without anything done about it. But nah, why would we want to get rid of at best karma whoring faggots or at worst shills overloading with low effort circlejerks for easy upvotes. Why would we want to make sure our top 25-50 posts aren't filled with spam so when those on the outside looking in we're best using our collective and immense power to influence by spreading the truth, reporting news and commentary you won't see anywhere else debunking fake news and narratives, posting hard hitting memes and top tier hilarious ones? Nah fuck that we can't take away the, \"show some love\" (insert pic), \"we're being brigaded (insert cute girl), \"make this the first result\" (insert pic), \"no pepe\" (insert most common pepe), here's another repost (gimme karma), etc etc karma whores, what would we do without them?", "263" ], [ "The voices may be amplified by astroturfing but they still echo the sentiments of far too many.\n\nIs the hate all whites and men merely astroturf too? Ofc not, these are the same loud voices spewing absolute contempt against anything not aligning with their dogma and they are indeed no small fringe group. These SJW beliefs are socially acceptable in a manner not even comparable to what they accuse us of.", "763" ], [ "Not really a gamer anymore but a bi/weekly thread for friend requests and making or joining clans/leagues sounds like it'd be fun and great for the community.\n\nBi/weekly photoshop battles, roast/shit talking/bantz, airing of the grievances ala Festivas and/or challenge/bet, among other threads of the kind for fun in the offseason when there's really only so much you can say sounds like a good plan. In the challenge threads winners could get a special icon/flair perhaps?", "109" ], [ "You're missing the point which is we grossly overpaid <PERSON> so we didn't have to commit long term to him or anyone. \n\nI absolutely agree we shouldn't have and took our chances starting fat <PERSON> who works at Dominos instead of paying <PERSON> and using the money elsewhere, anywhere else. But we had the space and pissing away ~$5m for just one year wasn't actually a terrible decision.", "747" ], [ "With how the league is and seemingly how our offense is (or should be) moving towards, it's all about the pass blocking OL imo. Avg run blocking can absolutely be more than enough for success with good play calling.\n\nCurious with his terrific pass blocking skills if he could move to LT. But it's not <PERSON> so a top RT is worth not potentially fucking him up into being a below avg LT.", "536" ], [ "I actually could use a few terrific autistic programmers. My basement is yours and your cravings for tendies shall never leave you wanting. The Mountain Dew in your cups shall over floweth. Your fingertips never left uncoated with Dorito mist.\n\nNot even joking actually...\n\nFree room and board and also a fair percentage of the company/profit if it ever made anything (it would, it'd be YUGE). I'm not greedy at all, especially since I couldn't do it without help so...Obi One Autismo, you're my only hope.", "652" ], [ "Yes, we overpayed him about double his value hence pissed away $5m.\n\n<PERSON> was a high want because potentially could play LT but was too much to risk on the small sample size. But wow I thought you must be off with the \"only two year commitment\" but he did get all his money up front. Yeah, now I'm definitely even more unhappy we didn't make that move. Or even for that, name blanking, former Sea LT signed with Den with no guaranteed.\n\nStill don't like the idea of paying top dollar at OG for <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, or <PERSON>. Position is far easier to find in the draft but then again, if we can only commit to 2yr I have no problem with it but still, ideally it goes to OT over OG. There's some intriguing young and very talented former busts like <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> who'd be cheap I'd take a flier on to battle a 2nd/3rd rookie to start.\n\nMy ideal route is the stud stopgap <PERSON> at LT. <PERSON> the long term answer at RT. And a cheap potential guy in FA to battle for LG (move <PERSON> to RG), <PERSON>'s flexibility for OT is nice and who knows he could put it all together. 2 of our first 3 picks are LG and C. Pass on LT this year because it's absolutely our '18 1st round pick. Do not want to rely on a mid 2nd LT as the future at arguably the 2nd most important position in football, especially in this weak draft class, so banking on a 1st in what should be a better draft is the far better option imo.\n\nMoney shouldn't be an issue unless we're stupid with AD but if <PERSON> isn't an option due to staying in CIN then I guess it's a short 1-2yr commitment to a Kalil ($7.1 calculated market value according to spotrac) or Reiff ($5.3).", "228" ], [ "According to spotrac estimated value <PERSON> is at $1.8m for whatever that's worth. He is interesting but wouldn't want to invest much unless we didn't get two top OT, then throwing like $4-5m for 4-5yrs would be worth the gamble if we're only committed to 2yrs. Those others are estimated at $8.5-10.5m+ and <PERSON> at $6.2.\n\nIf we can get both we absolutely should. Can't settle for only a decent fix and would have to pay ~$6m at least for a below avg LT like <PERSON>. Clearly big moves need to be done to fix the shit show we've dealt with so what's an extra ~$5m or so spent there for a couple years to upgrade it as much as possible? If we cut AD, that plus Fusco's money alone is enough to sign <PERSON> and <PERSON>. Give <PERSON> $22m/2yr fully guaranteed year one and draft his replacement 1st round in '18 is perfect.\n\nNot a fan of <PERSON> and agree on <PERSON> so a gamble on <PERSON> at LT (or RT maybe try <PERSON> at LT) I'd be on board with as plan B and no <PERSON> or trade. If <PERSON> is off the table then a 2nd and 4th for <PERSON> would be worth it. Plus sign <PERSON> and we go from garbage to a top 5-10 OL. \n\n<PERSON> has to do everything he can to upgrade our OL the very best he can. If he doesn't make huge, only moderate improvements at OL his seat should be warm. If he keeps and overpays AD and neglects any big moves for OL it should be hot.", "228" ], [ "Mostly agree, at the least major hot seat in '18. The OL problems were completely foreseeable imo but <PERSON> banked on everything just working out. <PERSON> garbage since his rookie year (fluke vs poor competition), <PERSON> multiple injuries and age, <PERSON> one good year then injuries and horrible since, <PERSON> getting older and a big injury so even a tiny loss in mobility ends a career when you're that huge. And he didn't invest any high draft picks there since <PERSON>. Shit, like <PERSON> and still have hope for <PERSON> but there's two 1sts right there who've done fuck all.\n\nWhy wouldn't you for <PERSON>? Hate to give up picks but have zero faith we'd get a good LT there. He has a great contract and if we can get 3-4 years of top 5 LT play it's absolutely worth it imo. That's our Championship window as well with this roster.\n\nBesides OL we don't really have any big holes. Draft RB in the 3rd. Vet 2 down LB are cheap (hopefully <PERSON> starts). Not really anything else assuming we re-sign most of our guys but we have others to fill in their spots if 1-2 leave/retire. Basically everything should take a backseat to fixing the OL immediately, we can't wait nor hope it'll work out.", "195" ], [ "We do have two 3rds and an extra 4th so can still go RB and OG/C. I've yet to delve into OL prospects so only know it's thought to be a very weak class. A good LT is just so hard to find and we're absolutely desperate so have no problem giving up those picks. \n\nAgree on the championship window thinking but pointing out how we'll see big changes roster-wise after then so my thinking is specifically on our current group of core players who are all now or will be in their primes the next few years. That 5-0 team is the team we are with a good OL, only thing holding us back from being legit SB contenders now and for the next few years.\n\nBrowns are in a complete rebuild so adding picks for <PERSON> along with trading down their 1st overall is best for them imo. They're not competing anytime soon, <PERSON> will be retired or about to by the time they get their shit together.", "964" ] ]
479
[ 13246, 23151, 19916, 9244, 23685, 12846, 915, 727, 17643, 15926, 5216, 6672, 10488, 23187, 14710, 11534, 14364, 16108, 21723, 2958, 24950, 23712, 11957, 11851, 7878, 13030, 13327, 23568, 6910, 7539, 2085, 22225, 16713, 8843, 12575, 17802, 16152, 11809, 4136, 16403, 2927, 19687, 9617, 2166, 9372, 16468, 11811, 20828, 2451, 13302, 13335, 9525, 10303, 12549, 20815, 14188, 747, 2131, 16988, 4262, 15186, 10283, 833, 5390, 432, 1425, 1625, 12265, 1093, 17544, 5468, 19376, 7799, 21909, 3097, 14512, 72, 8322, 8508, 22020, 6038, 9758, 19325, 5348, 21595, 12411, 20330, 10895, 384, 4711, 3457, 2914, 11866, 17625, 397, 15122, 14164, 11556, 8502, 7047, 88, 12426, 21811, 20272, 7920, 24094, 11133, 19243, 11063, 18945, 21522, 4744, 409, 9677, 7995, 19870, 24912, 4949, 8262, 21183, 8204, 2533, 11773, 11526, 16399, 16099, 12416, 12916, 2134, 21420, 16522, 19661, 7498, 9885, 5035, 18329, 8533, 18441, 21843, 9936, 25356, 1941, 14855, 24188, 3988, 19359, 13610, 10614, 15585, 18224, 24693, 16309, 5537, 6861, 13428, 3122, 22456, 31, 2, 2998, 4638, 23163, 5072, 5804, 22851, 6685, 1062, 14598, 6095, 14316, 18353, 6741, 2105, 8767, 6373, 13092, 7229, 1352, 10497, 21932, 9719, 18940, 14139, 5649, 13732, 13628, 11991, 2718, 20754, 1819, 7781, 19740, 24043, 4526, 2045, 8980, 12531, 24577, 19251, 8695, 4324, 18286, 3982, 18461, 3131, 9127, 15295, 25049, 10763, 3381, 4704, 22373, 22259, 22178, 25180, 16708, 20610, 16182, 861, 10657, 21104, 7879, 5946, 9033, 7305, 13891, 23440, 4872, 17668, 18864, 12414, 6744, 10867, 22149, 2363, 12470, 9041, 17079, 22443, 3442, 2691, 5466, 15915, 171, 11192, 18706, 25343, 19050, 8418, 21663, 15707, 7954, 14011, 11036, 12724, 11074, 11837, 10376, 10813, 21151, 2125, 16804, 13228, 441, 18898, 23135, 25341, 6600, 6644, 15890, 20755, 14920, 11157, 4768, 11632, 20371, 17592, 2551, 4836, 14542, 15658, 9672, 6272, 23902, 9294, 12597, 10859, 8879, 2249, 9687, 6680, 3611, 20088, 145, 3824, 9308, 19711, 8066, 14969, 14261, 14436, 21316, 11119, 14178, 15135, 8790, 15259, 7291, 8319, 21778, 10981, 23288, 14545, 22275, 21023, 12402, 9019, 1203, 21756, 19437, 15129, 9268, 24627, 24314, 11326, 1650, 4969, 10812, 17132, 20210, 9097, 18042, 2078, 22535, 13780, 24734, 2970, 24652, 1763, 7184, 10081, 23635, 2336, 4971, 1358, 13759, 25333, 4171, 11503, 11902, 15563, 8626, 13961, 17609, 14418, 17580, 6813, 5841, 12028, 22180, 11455, 2109, 8250, 19027, 2398, 1851, 3150, 9227, 16589, 19516, 14618, 13625, 22254, 11545, 18341, 20604, 22116, 18212, 13411, 15904, 16278, 1799, 16862, 8973, 20478, 16886, 14977, 10118, 11946, 8832, 25493, 3928, 12465, 135, 10955, 23804, 15255, 2294, 19910, 24193, 8514, 13157, 20789, 12518, 3397, 4273, 15494, 1339, 1896, 16462, 3654, 427, 13868, 3911, 12271, 13701, 3406, 15758, 2641, 7923, 12537, 11801, 20662, 23792, 21036, 18003, 13419, 660, 3529, 18905, 20039, 22062, 13818, 8158, 4105, 18717, 3420, 22983, 10479, 5078, 6058, 15880, 17410, 25328, 129, 4507, 21395, 22905, 17875, 3797, 8272, 7158, 19759, 14538, 670, 12035, 10982, 8063, 4996, 6881, 3009, 4891, 18912, 23351, 14162, 19347, 4941, 16802, 9381, 1264, 17488, 22730, 21618, 10576, 2573, 1898, 4992, 17759, 8896, 8557, 17997, 15994, 8224, 14505, 2904, 24694, 17016, 16102, 22022, 22328, 14100, 12289, 654, 17894, 5960, 10726, 1230, 4486, 3821 ]
reddit_dump_-Hououin-Kyouma-
[ [ "Eh, I'd say there were other things that be criticized; like the repeated \"fake out\" deaths of the 12 Moons, or the sexualization of a 12 Y/O, but overall I'd generally agree that it's biggest issue was having a rushed ending. Perhaps a bit of a lack of direction too, I'm not entirely sure the author knew how they wanted to beat <PERSON>. It feels a bit too throw together for my taste, but again that probably a pacing issue. With a bit more time the ending could've been much better. Except for chapter 205; that would've shit no matter what.", "513" ], [ "Oh I mean WHEN they fought them. In the Upper Moon 6 the one that was a brother sister combo they faked out killed them AT LEAST three times. I'd have to back and check, but I actually think it was four. And for reference when I say fake out death I mean stuff like ending a chapter with someone decapitating them and then starting the next chapter with \"I cut my own head off a half second before you decapitated me!\" (Yeah I'm never gonna let the author live that one down.) It was fairly prolific in the latter sections especially, and since the latter sections were most Upper Moon fights it ended up being REALLY common during those. I THINK it happened at least once for every fight, but <PERSON> might not count since I don't recall them doing that except when he regenerates without his head. Which didn't really count IMO since he dies anyways. \n \nAs for the sexualization of a 12 Y/O; I don't recall who <PERSON> was, but I'm talking about <PERSON>. Hiking her kimono up all the time was whatever, a little weird, but pretty tame for <PERSON>. Then there stuff like the 6th Upper Moon fight where her <PERSON> practically falls off and I cannot stress enough; since demons stop aging that means <PERSON> is for all intents and purposes still 12. Even after the two year training time skip TECHNICALLY making her 14, and even then she slept for those two years anyways so it hardly counts. But my point is pretty much any time <PERSON> actually fought her <PERSON> pretty much came undone and that was a super creepy application of fanservice since she was canonically 12, or at best 14-15. I mean shit at least <PERSON> was 19. \n \nI actually liked the Hashira's/Pillar's well enough despite the pacing. I've read a fair amount of shounen so the short time frame wasn't too much of an issue IMO. The author generally did a good enough job of having the reader get to know them, they could use some work on their flashback placement, but overall the only one I think really failed to land their character arc was the <PERSON> guy. We just didn't him long enough, and when he dies they fucking act like we just killed of <PERSON> or <PERSON>.", "13" ], [ "Yeah seriously! <PERSON> helping him kill <PERSON> was the quintessential Shounen way to end that fight. There wasn't point in bucking the trend for the sake of bucking the trend just have your cool moment and enjoy it. \nWhile I can see the anime maybe adding some epilogue to the show unfortunately I doubt they cut the additional stuff from the <PERSON> fight. They could cut chapter 205, but I doubt they'll do that either...", "13" ], [ "I'm going to build the Sentinel Gurren Lagann (and eventually Lazagann) kit(s) is there anything I should watch out for/any advice for building these? \nWhen Topcoating is it okay to spray in sections? Like say head/torso/arms/legs or should I disassemble the whole kit first? \nAlso, is there any good way of making the MG Unicorn less...unstable? I just put most of it together and holy shit does it feel like it going to fall apart.", "59" ], [ "Out of curiosity have you read much Shounen Manga/Jump? Cause I'm really curious if the fake out stuff was just a lot cooler if I hadn't grown up reading YuYu Hakusho/HxH/Bleach/Naruto/Etc. \nAlso I understand that there's going to be fanservice, and I agree that the author did a great job at keeping it to a minimum, but using the 12 Y/O as your primary vehicle for it was really my problem. I don't care how popular she is <PERSON> is again canonically, technically twelve but, at best 14-15.", "709" ], [ "Yeah my bad, I was thinking Upper 6 not 4. I mean 4 definitely had that \"You cut off my head, but wait I'm actually 4 kids wearing a trenchcoat, but I'm actually a fifth (even tinier) guy in the trenchcoat, but wait there was actually a smaller tenchcoat inside the first trenchcoat and I'm inside the second trenchcoat\" (That metaphor got too convoluted and I'll be the first to own up to it.) But that sort of thing is actually exactly what I'm talking about. \nUpper moon 6 might not be as bad as I was thinking though. They do the power level fake out a lot (Normal, With Sash, I feel like I'm forgetting a powerup but I don't want to go look up the chapter, with brother) but now that I'm thinking on it the only fakeout in that fight might be when they reveal the brother. \nAs for <PERSON> I actually coincidentally don't count that because despite the fact that he comes back he dies immediately afterwards anyways. I totally agree <PERSON> though, even if they hadn't already pulled the fakeout card so many times it was obvious that cutting off his head wasn't going to kill him, so I didn't take too much issue with that either. Like I said it was mostly stuff like \"I cut my head off a half second before you did!\" that really made me roll my eyes.", "254" ], [ "Yeah third eye, that was the other power up! I just mean the standard shounen jump fare of \"You beat me, but I wasn't really at full power!\" like <PERSON> in DBZ. I call it a fakeout because in a lot of cases there isn't really any point to them not just going all out from the start. Using Upper Moon 4 as an example of that is pretty bad though as for the most part it made sense why she wasn't batting 100 out of the gate.", "189" ], [ "Oh yeah I actually agree. I'm saying that although they did use the \"Power up\" card several times during the fight I actually didn't mind it too much because it was decently well written. I mean it's still a little annoying IMO, but there is a clear line of reasoning you can follow to see why she does it that way. Essentially I'm saying that although I did bring up the \"power up fake out\" it's really not that bad, especially compared to \"decapitation fake outs\"", "535" ], [ "2) I'd personally say either painting or even paint pen would be the best way to go. I don't think line accent would work very well for a wide detail, but I could be wrong. \n3) It shouldn't be possible as long as the cap was fully on. I've used mine over about 2-3 months and it's just fine. I suppose it could be defective? Have you tried pressing lighter or harder? Also I'm not sure how recommended this actually is, but you MIGHT be able to get it to work by scraping the end of the tip lightly with a hobby knife.", "761" ], [ "Oh I liked it in concept I just thought it drug on too long. Showing every single member of the Corps descendants/reincarnations and giving pretty much ALL of them a line or two just makes the chapter too long IMO. I would've preferred if it was short 1-4 pages of the modern day. Overall though a pretty enjoyable read, and I had a lot of fun discussing it with everyone in this thread.", "1010" ], [ "I personally haven't built the Wing Zero, but I can chime in and say Barbatos is pretty solid. It's pretty straightforward too; I didn't have any issue at all putting it together. It'd be a pretty good place to start MG IMO except that it's pretty damn recent so if you build older MG's after that you'd be spoiled. I agree with <PERSON> though, \"Wow cool robot\" is totally valid, and more often not how I decide what to buy.", "144" ], [ "Damn son, yours is looking a LOT cleaner than mine... \nPersonally I actually bought the MG Sazabi first, but had it shipped from Japan (Still haven't got it yet 0_0) and then I bought the MG Nu Ver Ka. and realized I probably shouldn't build that as my first MG. So I wound up building Char's Zaku 2.0 as my first MG. Was a pretty good place to start, simple and solid with very little issue. Other than that goddamn tubing.", "144" ], [ "Ah thanks, I couldn't find it on the translated list, so I didn't know where to check, but since everywhere seemed adamant it was March I wanted to see if anyone knew what was up. \nIf there's gonna be a kit drought then it's a real good thing I just stocked up to high hell and back. I'm gonna have 1 MG, 4 RG's, 5 HG's, a 1/100 NG/FM, and a non-Bandai kit to finish. So thankfully that won't impact me too terribly much; hell it'll encourage me to not keep buying more kits (thus adding to my mounting backlog.)", "599" ], [ "MS Design was mostly cool, but holy hell do I think it was one of the absolute worst shows I've ever watched. It literally has no central plot to follow most of the time, and a LOT of the side characters honestly don't contribute anything to the show. Mix that with what little plot it honestly has feeling like a knockoff of Turn A and I just really couldn't get into it.", "522" ], [ "I'm sorry to say you might have made a terrible mistake. Make sure to be very careful and read the instructions closely. Also, it might me pretty loose in some (or most) places once you're done. I feel like you ought to know in advance (assuming you don't already) so that you might tapper your expectations a little bit. In my opinion MG Unicorn was a less than stellar kit, which is not to say it's outright bad, just less good than a lot of others. I might also be a bit biased since I built it right after the Sinanju which was a pretty fantastic build.", "59" ], [ "Hmm I haven't personally built an HG Bael but I assume it uses polycaps? If that's the case I assume you're wearing them out, though 6 days does seem excessively short. If it does use polycaps than you might be able to purchase a set of replacements; if it's not a polycap and it uses a peg of some sort, you might be able to dab a bit of superglue on the peg (wait for it dry BEFORE reassembling) to tighten up the joint. However I'm sure someone who knows a bit more about your specific issue will come along later, so take this all with a grain of salt seeing as it's purely hypothetical.", "301" ], [ "Sorry if there's a understanding, but I'm gonna lead by clarifying that I'm talking about Japanese shipping in general here. I'm guessing S7E probably uses Sea based/small air packet shipping to reduce shipping costs. \n That said I ordered a MG Sazabi from Banzaihobby just about 2 monthes ago now, and I'll I've got for an update is some limited tracking that tells me it left Kanagawa February 2nd. That's an entire month (coming up on two) with no contact whatsoever. Not responding to an email for two weeks IS pretty unreasonable, but the shipping time itself isn't that weird for Japan. \n S7E has a pretty good rep overall, so I'd personally shoot the guy another E-mail and give it a week or so (after this second e-mail) before assuming I've been duped. I believe Paypal gives you 90 days to raise a complaint, so unless you need the money RIGHT now I'd say you have nothing to lose by giving him a second chance. That's just my overly long two cents though.", "682" ], [ "So the loose part is the part connecting to the polycap? When you say the legs upper joints I'm afraid I'm unsure of where exactly you mean. I assume you mean where the leg meets the waist. Hmmm it'd be a bit difficult to say since I'm not super familiar with the part you're referring to any chance you could take a pick of the part in question or the specific part of the manual that shows said part?", "301" ], [ "Hmmm well if the loose part is the leg peg going INTO the polycap you might be able to put a bit of superglue onto the peg, wait for it dry BEFORE reassembling, and then popping it into the PC and seeing if that tighten up the connection a bit. That said I'm unsure whether that will really work I'm kind of shooting from the hip here. You might consider waiting to see if someone else can offer more concrete advice.", "301" ], [ "Depends on what you expect from it really. Everything I'd built up until then had been rock solid, so the loose connections and finicky transformation mechanic were definitely shocking. On the other hand maybe you did just get lucky, cause even now I don't really want to mess with how I've got it posed cause I know SOMETHING will go wrong. OOC do you keep it in Unicorn or Destroy?", "453" ] ]
374
[ 22704, 23352, 11578, 15325, 5763, 19689, 16615, 18259, 8799, 404, 21189, 7013, 7953, 13774, 4350, 8670, 8900, 22917, 6457, 19320, 9477, 15100, 10620, 8212, 15693, 6161, 292, 10137, 13884, 6475, 18471, 23277, 11172, 6294, 10949, 8261, 13514, 13814, 6887, 6912, 12117, 7258, 13897, 9890, 14432, 4957, 517, 18158, 8622, 2937, 14843, 6889, 12040, 13189, 3693, 13731, 10344, 2077, 25108, 11440, 4743, 19675, 8380, 11769, 4984, 22090, 9774, 8608, 2356, 2268, 7897, 11190, 6476, 6823, 7596, 5814, 14849, 8731, 12463, 22953, 14742, 23129, 12688, 13100, 7077, 11933, 4445, 6243, 16692, 8767, 16546, 4098, 9387, 14632, 19640, 24248, 23065, 20182, 2063, 25485, 7196, 17865, 3337, 9183, 7020, 442, 21175, 25418, 1248, 4302, 5552, 18069, 10805, 1002, 19676, 1114, 12406, 11737, 5777, 4976, 20201, 9647, 855, 350, 11660, 23547, 3972, 12981, 17717, 10308, 6553, 14832, 23414, 9218, 8473, 8105, 19684, 9233, 14492, 15559, 1282, 14414, 3162, 5001, 19777, 14441, 2217, 11752, 23380, 7798, 6253, 4386, 9426, 24331, 10847, 13999, 10990, 17594, 12029, 12438, 20346, 22282, 15354, 3119, 5095, 16340, 1157, 12460, 1226, 24540, 7743, 8983, 738, 1284, 358, 2039, 14244, 1684, 13914, 7082, 7185, 3718, 1081, 16149, 7657, 13151, 23660, 10517, 23496, 9488, 7168, 3982, 13029, 2406, 3265, 11338, 6871, 25435, 15918, 875, 12298, 3887, 1978, 13430, 9118, 3531, 9389, 15017, 5982, 3435, 126, 5928, 12924, 9925, 2833, 62, 4850, 21079, 11527, 854, 4831, 18350, 23275, 6692, 19990, 13605, 16341, 10162, 9444, 13287, 24137, 3298, 9801, 15213, 18020, 11598, 24041, 8884, 11976, 21976, 1844, 1199, 16923, 17009, 7302, 3884, 16722, 1934, 9614, 1407, 13841, 15273, 13262, 22985, 25513, 12080, 8488, 13640, 13445, 8127, 14316, 7070, 2843, 13944, 11540, 9716, 6477, 5066, 14059, 5347, 23508, 14793, 2117, 22999, 19612, 19209, 25266, 23300, 2016, 8083, 14046, 4415, 2329, 16479, 24181, 5448, 7428, 14413, 9079, 2825, 20804, 7355, 6587, 14001, 6446, 20034, 13697, 6921, 6791, 5836, 8652, 14002, 5308, 3294, 8578, 110, 3882, 22730, 433, 1578, 21252, 3571, 10042, 22452, 18008, 6293, 25047, 18236, 10699, 17870, 23344, 17071, 12615, 2400, 10078, 12316, 3681, 11057, 11504, 14133, 5896, 938, 52, 9967, 4785, 6589, 13932, 1454, 32, 1174, 12026, 8637, 17406, 13422, 2634, 5756, 24315, 13271, 828, 14063, 17974, 3724, 24892, 21300, 25407, 21721, 7093, 13981, 14572, 11337, 1409, 13582, 21448, 555, 7305, 8500, 22583, 5456, 18287, 6195, 15569, 579, 12231, 2162, 17665, 13434, 12360, 12297, 7797, 20568, 12766, 16026, 10381, 25541, 3829, 11318, 21876, 3314, 65, 5846, 13744, 6549, 14048, 11262, 16115, 22447, 4127, 11203, 13134, 5262, 23348, 4663, 8425, 23290, 167, 6214, 23898, 24241, 13036, 10301, 7811, 14676, 2741, 16184, 13341, 15239, 14768, 22439, 3370, 20882, 3712, 17063, 9881, 21315, 6458, 17975, 10905, 14512, 2100, 8959, 10919, 21014, 14481, 25273, 20467, 4161, 15471, 16125, 1803, 3468, 5474, 15223, 13252, 12017, 19516, 1598, 6601, 2251, 9397, 8746, 16598, 14012, 957, 12626, 6630, 4844, 14052, 9876, 1357, 16179, 19424, 12494, 4570, 22107, 9142, 21731, 9541, 24798, 6580, 19434, 3467, 13386, 19214, 22171, 11700, 17109, 24481, 3415, 4887, 13673, 24369, 2800, 11045, 12473, 21336, 5738, 13218, 1879, 9940, 19707, 23537, 3283, 19405, 20581, 16049, 7859, 2603, 23413, 15271 ]
reddit_dump_-HypogeanMk2
[ [ "Can you imagine the archetypal guy from the 1950s sitting down to his kitchen table in the morning, <PERSON>, braces and slacks about to open the newspaper and he sees this shit. Just conceptualise that reaction and you'll see why bug culture is terrible.\n\nThey probably have grandfathers or great grandfathers who fought in WW2, Imagine their reactions, It's not like these guys are being like this because they have a small child around that they're trying to keep happy. These guys are reacting like this for themselves. Arrested development has been encouraged and so here we are. Grown men, reacting like toddlers would to seeing their favourite character on some cereal.", "871" ], [ "Just let them, their hubris is going to and already is backfiring as normies start to feel uncomfortable. When our side makes them laugh and is welcoming, The momentum will accumulate. It's inevitable at this point I can't tell you how many people I've seen say that they went from \"liberal\" to right wing. Italy, Austria and even Sweden for heaven's sake is demonstrating that their political pendulums are shifting probably for the next few decades into right wing traditionalism, nativism and actual conservation of the cultures and nations. \n\nThat's why I get annoyed at blackpillers and hope other people do too. Stop being miserable because you're a chock against the wheel to any normies waking up.", "965" ], [ "It's also not how evolution works either.\n\nDominant traits pass down through replicating processes and mutations randomly occur when exposed to various environmental factors.\n\nDoes the guy for example believe Kangaroos who evolved on their own are any less of an animal or lack capability because they were \"out of the gene pool\".\n\nJust absolute nonsense encouraging nobody to look like their ancestors. \n\n*I FVCKING <PERSON>! they say.*", "931" ], [ "I think Great Depression 2 is going to happen before then, which is when people will have no fucks left to give and the modern political paradigm will be completely destroyed.\n\nSee how long the soymen in cities will stay soft and beta when the food supply chain breaks down.\n\nAll the corrupt politicians who sold out their countries for money will be broke as everyone else and the ire of the people will be unstoppable.", "725" ], [ "You mean like how when yt became overwhelming minority in Rhodesia and South Africa? Where they were and are routinely blamed for every ill in the world whilst also being victimised by the state's that they inhabit.\n\nIf yt becomes a minority in America, they will justify the asset siezing and inevitable violence as reparations for slavery. In the UK it will be \"because of the Empire\", In Germany it will be because of WW2... and so on.\n\nWake up before telling others to look at reality.", "180" ], [ "Learn where the nearest woodland / meadow area is and where those wild edibles could be found, In a total starvation tier great depression, in the UK for example there are Dandelions, Nettles and thistles that grow almost anywhere, If you research how to prepare them you can eat them, Not exactly the most tasty thing but it's still better than nothing -being able to identify edible nut trees like Hazel for example. \n\nLearn where wild game congregates like rabbits and the like, Pure consumer normies will not know this and you'll probably be the only person to have a hunting spot if you're clever about it. \n\nIf you're surrounded by concrete jungle You can do indoor hydroponics and grow things on your windowsill if you don't have a garden. Even though I have a garden to grow things, I have my house's windowsills with peppers growing on them. You can grow things like Beans almost anywhere, Mushrooms can literally be grown in the pitch black in a closet and have a quick harvest time 2-3 weeks and Potatoes can be grown in anything from shopping bags to buckets. Fastest vegetables to grow are stuff like raddishes too.\n\nClassic one people can do if they have a balcony, Is grow tomatoes upside down and hang them on the balcony. You can get at least 1 or 2 trusses from a 2 litre bottle converted to hang tomatoes as I've tried it myself, probably more if you have optimal nutrition for the plants.\n\nI love learning this information as a hobby, Gotta have the mental knowledge to survive if clown world shits the bed.", "388" ], [ "Good luck when the food stores run out because \"ha, lol, you want to survive off wild edibles and cultivate food indoors or in general lol it's not gonna sustain you bro\" ... \"oh no my last baked beans tin is empty NOW what will I have to eat? I WAS TOO BUSY LAUGHING TO LEARN WHAT'S EDIBLE!!!\". I'm just messing with you, I get the point.\n\nHowever, A box of white button mushrooms can cultivate a shit load of protein in a short amount of time and it can be done out of sight too. Your MREs and shit won't last forever so it's best to have not only a food store, But all of what I talked about as well.\n\nI would also say if you've got the land or space for them, Having your own chickens helps too. The eggs they lay are still a perfect protein source for humans. So if you have a huge barrel of rice in your basement or whatever, You could feasably have eggs, mushrooms and rice for a decent amount of people. If you wanted variety, Beans grow quite easily too and are a decent source of protein and fiber.", "166" ], [ "> Why tf are grown men these days obsessed with superheroes and <PERSON> toys\n\nIt's a substitute for the inate need to live for something higher than themselves. I know it sounds crazy in regards to bugmen but I think these people are searching for the modern equivalent of the great biblical stories or the ancient legends of <PERSON> and odin etc... It's been engineered that they seek that fulfillment amongst consumerism.", "645" ], [ "Anything from MIGardener to Styxhexenhammer666's gardening videos. <PERSON>'s videos on his ThuleanPerspective channel about Permaculture and sustainable living etc... I usually follow the trends of gardeners like GrowYourGreens and the recommended videos.\n\nMIGardener has some indoor gardening videos for cultivating fresh salad greens and stuff too.\n\nSearching for Kratky Hydroponics or \"no electric hydroponics\" etc... \n\nThen for wild edibles, Channels like \"Learn Your Land\" are a wealth of knowledge in that area.", "391" ], [ "Even though these are screenshots, This is a conspiracy theory güy!\n\nFor real though, This obvious agenda pushing being exposed over and over turned me from a normie classical Liberal to whatever I am now, a woke nationalist, traditionalist actual conservative -wanting to conserve their people and homeland.\n\nI kept excusing it saying \"It's just one example, one asshole writing a headline\", Then the twitter \"fellow white people\" hate coming for no reason, until I just realised that only one political side has answers to fix this, before the West becomes entirely South Africa 2.0. - Seeing what's happening out there was also a red pill.", "827" ], [ "Here's how I stop myself from getting down in the dumps; imagine it's your responsibility to record how you beat the depression, so that one day you could help others. Like atlas, take the burden upon your shoulders to make sure you're able to help the next generation. \n\nAlso if you have space for it, Gardening or growing a bonsai tree can help with the connection to the world, knowing that you're helping \"mother nature\" has been a tremendous positive aspect to my daily mood.\n\nhope some of that was helpful bud.", "306" ], [ "What's weird is that my dreams have been incredible lately literally entertainment lol, I haven't had to actively induce lucid dreaming, It could be coincidence, but I only seem to have dreams like this when on a streak. \n\nFor example, I was having a nightmare that was obviously going to end badly, pitch black shadowy monster and the group I was in the dream with were being picked off one by one until it was just me left. It was a industrial grungy warehouse or something as far as I can remember. \n\nI felt that familiar \"oh shit, it's a nightmare\" feeling you always get before waking up, except this time I had a realisation, literally as the monster was about to pounce on me. The thought came through my head, \"this is your dream why are you letting this happen\" and as cheesey and gay as it sounds I willed wolverine claws and cut the thing's head off after which the whole warehouse lit up white. One of the best lucid dreams I had.\n\nI've had lucid dreams about being in WW2 and even having shoot outs with old school gangsters. Always seems to happen when I'm on a streak, My gut instinct is that it's my subconscious knows I like lucid dreaming and therefore is making them happen for the dopamine replacement or something, during the recovery from PMO super stimuli and the subsequent dopamine.", "188" ], [ "This is one of the foundational groundwork questions I ask in a relationship. If we're aiming together long term, that she doesn't become a ham planet - As I also say I won't too. If she's already into fitness and stuff, it's an easier sell, other than that expect a Class 3 Enterprise tier Braphog by the time you're 18 months married if you haven't brought it up. \n\nSo many thin / average men I see being dragged around by gigantic women and I just can't understand how you can be so soft as to not only let themselves become unattractive to you, But to enable their health being at risk.", "209" ], [ "In response to the meme, The Nazis didn't prosecute a guy who taught his dog do a nazi salute in the 1930s.\n\nThe modern Scottish government did.\n\nNot advocating either, Just pointing out historical facts in regards to edgy jokes. The absolute state of leftist memes again, They didn't salute whilst marching because of the \"tick tocking\" it would enable in the formation... basic historical military knowledge would help in making the memes more effective. They seriously can't meme.", "743" ], [ "I've never been more aware of ideological subversion than what is taking place on T_D. They are brainwashed into thinking they're saving America, whilst they endorse the demographic collapse of the founding population. It's as bad as certain youtube personalities, Where they think Anglo-Saxon values of liberty, will still exist after the Anglo-Saxons become a minority in their countries or cease existing at all.\n\nThe moment the demographics collapse in America, You'll have Brazil 2.0 / Venezuela 2.0. The UK will be Lebanon 2.0, The EU will be Sharia-Commie states.", "827" ], [ "Take the OMAD, Whole foods Paleo or Keto pill.\n\nDon't let the Simple Carbohydrate hook you. If that's not viable, Have one cheat day every other week. Replace sweets or junk food and shit, With raisins or grapes (they even have resveratrol which is a natural aromatase inhibitor- Stops fat turning Testosterone into Estrogen, therefore helping T-levels increase). Eat Celery, Onions, Kale, Spinach or Broccoli or cruciferous veg with every meal. Replace unhealthy processed fats with Olive Oil, Extra virgin olive oil even, Coconut Oil and 100% pure Peanut Butter...\n\nHGH is released when you do OMAD or intermittent fasting, which helps you build muscle, burn fat and depending on how old you are, Will make you taller (wish I knew this before I was in my 20s tbh). This contributes to higher overall testosterone levels and peak fitness.", "727" ], [ "Something that I realised a long time ago, Which lead me to quit watching porn permanently was that it dawned on me how many random Western women were involved with it - no doubt chewed up and spat out. Not the \"big name pornstars\" but the one-offs who are basically nameless... \n\nIt must be a fairly large percentage of the population involved with it, to have so much shit being uploaded to those sites daily. Amateurs or whatever, but them putting their faces out there with that sort of thing... It's like guaranteed self destruction, regret and certainly neuroticism issues. Huge amount of them being pretty American white young women, who have been drawn in by the postmodernist \"sexual liberation\" culture, with no shame. \n\nDoes anyone else understand what I'm getting at?\n\nIt's fucked up when you notice it.", "518" ], [ "Yeah, I've been lifting, I think I've experienced what the studies say first hand, HGH that is encouraged by OMAD is maintaining and building muscle. I notice that I recover quicker on OMAD, not noticed any decline in strength only improvements. IF has similar benefits of boosting HGH too.\n\nThe key is making sure you get adequate sleep and eat healthy fats, protein and nutrient dense green vegetables.\n\nThe thing I like about OMAD is that you can technically cheat or have a meal out as a social occasion and as long as you fast back to your normal eating window, You don't get tripped up fat loss wise, although water retention could happen. It turns from \"one bad day\" to \"one bad meal\" instead.", "412" ], [ "It's not precise for me, but for example one day I might have 4 fried free range eggs in olive oil, grilled bacon rashers and a pile of steamed broccoli, spinach and kale with gravy. Hitting ball park protein and fat macros whilst getting the vitamins and minerals from the veg.\n\nIt depends on how big you are and how big you're trying to get.\n\nIF 16:8 might be easier for some to bulk up and train, However I believe that the hormonal balance brought by OMAD is more important than being laser accurate with macros, but that's my anecdotal experience. If you're hungry during training it might mean you need more healthy fats in your meals.", "516" ], [ "Doesn't smoke or drink or do drugs either after his brother passed away from alcoholism.\n\nWhether people like it or not he's a good masculine archetype and rolemodel for men. Which is why the media and beta male leftists and feminists hate him so much. He has a large family, is successful with business and has a beautiful wife younger than himself... It's everything that the left hates.", "936" ], [ "Another thing I should add is that stomach acidity is key to absorbing nutrients, so if you're doing OMAD, having some apple cider vinegar diluted in water will help, if you drink lots of water (alkaline mostly) your stomach acid may be weaker. You can usually tell because you'll have indigestion or bloating after eating.\n\nThere are videos on youtube about it, I've gotten into the habit of having 1tbl spoon apple cider vinegar in 1/2 pint of water before a meal. Make sure you rinse your teeth afterwards though, swishing and spit plain water to make sure the acid doesn't effect your teeth over time.\n\nObviously this is dependent on how you feel so don't take this as medical advice because everyone is different.", "346" ], [ "They're not as upvoted as much as you would expect, so maybe normies are waking up to the demographic replacement that is undeniably happening, because they FUCKING love science, except for the biological reproduction data across the west. Whoever coined the term \"white genocide\" was controlled opposition to make the term sound inherently hyperbolic, especially if they weren't specifically talking about the brutality in South Africa.", "1020" ], [ "Nah, the capital is lost, But when the Cavaliers are summoned they shall be routed forth. \n\nOr we wall off the capital. \n\nSeriously though, I'm starting to think separatism for Wales and Scotland is the best course of action. Wales is where I would choose because they're still patriotic as fuck, Everything is named in Welsh so it keeps foreigners out, they still speak their ancient language and you could build a Wall along Offa's Dyke. 98% face country and reinstate the Marcher Lords to protect the border from cultural enrichment.", "105" ], [ "Also, who's the heroin addict looking fuck? He totally looks healthy and his opinions will be sound. It's just a right wing conspiracy theory though güy.\n\nTheir hubris will be the downfall, because I'm not going anywhere, neither are the other redpilled people across the West and I've already red pilled everyone in my life. There will be people who once said \"it's just a conspiracy theory\" who will have their minds changed by videos like this. So I hope they keep bragging about it.", "337" ], [ "They're rare but not totally rare. I've met some nice women in clubs (wholesome clubs like shooting) but they're usually already taken or they were older than me.\n\nThere are some classy and traditional women out there, but in the modern culture they're hard to find. There should be some dating site or something so that women who want this lifestyle can put it out there and men can do the same. I mean if you watch any redpill genre youtube video, there are broads in the comment sections -yeah they could be catfish, but the point is they're out there.\n\nI mean you've got tinder for degenerates and spreading STDs. \n\nBut there's nothing that I can think of that says \"Are you red pilled and do you want a big family?\". I mean we've got the internet, so you'd think it would be easier than ever.", "1017" ], [ "That's why we need women in the movement, they draw other women out of the brainwashed \"you're empowered by being a corporate drone\" logic.\n\nI've seen women commenting on <PERSON> videos, hell even <PERSON> videos saying that their eyes were opened to the potential of having a family. So all isn't lost yet.\n\nWhen <PERSON> was talking about the demographics of his audience, They were 75% male to 25% female so they're out there, All opinions about <PERSON> aside, the one thing he supports heavily is the atomic family unit and the traditional roles of Men and Women and their respective archetypes.", "490" ], [ "Good news is Western men are starting to reject porn anyway because of it's detrimental effects on mental health. I sometimes hear on random podcasts even, people bringing up the \"NoFap\" stuff, hell I think <PERSON> brought it up on The Dick Show which lead me to reading about all the silently omitted studies from the \"porn is good for you crowd\"... All the ncbi studies, all the anecdotes, the videos talking about super stimuli effecting your brain and my own personal feelings it was pretty straight forward from then on.\n\nOh and then finding out it was used as a weapon of psychological warfare to pacify an enemy in a \"\"\"CERTAIN REGION\"\"\" of the world, except in the 21st century it's being projected onto the Western people.", "518" ], [ "I've never used the term \"white genocide\" a part from describing what is happening in South Africa, from the torturing to death, to the necklacing, to the crucifixions... That is happening to people out there. \"White genocide\" was a term made up so it could be dismissed as hyperbole.\n\nDemographic trajectory of the West isn't some obscure timeline. White people are set to become minority within the next 50 years across the West. When White people become minorities, You end up with South Africa 2.0 and self-justified acts of violence for \"reparations\" etc... that rhetoric can already be heard from the UK to Universities in the USA. Wake the fuck up, you counter signalling shill.", "1020" ], [ "You're an idiot. Do you think I'm basing this on short term migration?\n\nFor the last 50 years America has been letting in upto 1,000,000 people a year or more.\n\nFor the last 50 years the UK has been letting in 50,000 to 300,000 a year.\n\nAlong with it came terrorism, foreign barbaric cultural practices from FGM to the grooming gangs, cartels in the case of the USA with a similar track record of violence. It has never changed or stopped.\n\nYour figures are wrong. Your ideas are literally wrong and you've obviously been conditioned by some countersignalling nihilist. London isn't even British any more. Any capital city of any nation you expect to see the host nation's culture. Not in the UK because of people like you excusing it. \"you're just fear mongering <PERSON>\" they said. Now the Anglo-Saxon is a minority in his own homeland's capital city.\n\nHere's a long video that goes into detail, All the facts can be checked for yourself: _URL_0_\n\nYou have no concept of demographic momentum, Which is what I realised is absolutely happening. Which was what tipped me from being a person who argues your crap, To talking about what's actually happening and is demonstrably happening in the USA, UK, Germany and France.\n\nFear mongering? If that's what you're going to call it... Yeah, the truth about what's happening is scary. Deal with it. Also, calling it \"fear mongering\" doesn't make it incorrect.\n\nI was in your spot once, But one day the penny will drop.", "678" ], [ "I've not been in an echo chamber at all, literally the opposite. I was a leftist, then classical liberal until I realised these ideologies have no answers and their thought leaders and activists are doing nothing to stop the degradation of the West. Since you bring up e-celeb posts; <PERSON> (classical liberal) who's probably considered far right to you, Said he doesn't even care about native british people and their future, with all his historical knowledge and stated pride in English history, He basically admitted he would take living in Somalia 2.0 as long as he can play his video games. I watched his videos for a long time, until I noticed a pattern of no ideological answers.\n\nUnironically posting <PERSON> and <PERSON> video too, where he played apologetics for the migrant crime wave that swept through Europe.\n****\n[That's just not true, White countries birth rates are going down.](_URL_0_)\n\nI'm not arguing about this with you any more. You don't just disagree, You're a troll by your shit tier comments: \n > Watch out bruh bruh the scary brown person is coming for your women \n\nIf you're a fan of exiting echo chambers watch the video I sent you and live by your own standards.\n\nThe only way Anglo-saxon values of Liberty exist, is if the Anglo-saxon stays the majority... and I'm sick of pretending like it's otherwise. When demonstrably every demographic minority in the USA and UK and EU for that matter, All vote for either hard left or socialist parties that want to constrict liberties and sap resources from the natives, whilst rewriting their heritage. Innocent people including children have died because of your sort of apologia being pumped out into the culture, by migrant terrorists, who wouldn't have been able to harm anyone, had they not been allowed in the first place. I'm sick of the bullshit and denying self evident reality.\n\nHow many cities in the UK need to become minority native population before you raise an eye brow? Same for the USA and so on. I'm done replying.", "579" ], [ "It's completely accurate as well.\n\nThey're happy to watch the ship sink because they don't truly care. They have no intention of having a family or feel anything in regards to tradition or their roots. They've undermined their true happiness with short term dopamine and ego inflating about how good a person they are. Whilst the terrible things happen around them because of the politics they advocate.\n\n\nYou couldn't come up with a better descriptor.", "142" ], [ "You don't neccessarily have to be religious, but I'm not joking when I say this, Just follow the NoFap thing and stop watching porn, jerking off in general. Mental clarity, needing less sleep, more energy and no lethargy. You'll need to put in effort to find a girl too.\n\nAfter every science rag, infotainment outlet and corporate bribed media firm was saying \"porn is okay\" and having no standards in regards to sex, masturbation and promiscuity or sleeping around -is a good thing, I decided to try the NoFap November meme being the contrarian I am.\n\nIt's night and day, after around 7 days abstaining, you get a 150% testosterone boost on average. \n\nEven higher overall after 21 days: _URL_2_\n\nProlactin is a hormone that is secreted after you've bashed the bishop. This is a hormone in a large or consistent quantity in your body is what leads to lethargy, procastination, lack of drive and tiredness. In my personal anecdotal opinion, I believe it's why people get depressed, even leading to the archetypal sexual deviant on twitter who will occassionally post about how bed-bound or depressed they are.\n\nI have found after committing to it fully and making my brain find dopamine elsewhere, That I'm more productive in my business ventures, My hobbies are productive outlets too. I can elucidate and articulate my thoughts about wider societal affairs without having the train of thought be derailed too and an improved sense of humour.\n\nNot saying you should become a total monk, Just saying to try it. No sexual activity basically outside of being with a woman.\n\nAlso the scary part, jerking off and watching porn -probably sexual deviancy in general too, literally makes your brain shrink (frontal lobe) and your grey matter shrink... Irreversible damage that people were never told about. - Effecting the parts of the brain that control rational decision making. REALLY MAKES YOU THINK HMMMMM!\n\n#Any of you guys here able to back me up if you're doing \"nofap\" yourself?\n\n\n******\n\n#More SOURCEs!?! Souarces! > \n\n* _URL_0_\n\n* _URL_1_ - *NCBI studies and Meta-Analyses included and listed on page.*\n\nWoah, güy, I fucking love science but this science contradicts my pozzed worldview and life style, checked your post history too, <PERSON>. God, I'm so smart. <PERSON> is a good man and by the way did I tell you that I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE, except for that science that contradicts my shit opinions about lifestyles and health... hahahah yeha.\n\nSorry for the hate facts. Unshackle yourself from degeneracy and ubermensch yourself, you fuck.", "524" ], [ "I know man, I was being facetious.\n\nI totally agree to be honest, but this subreddit is a catharsis for me knowing that I'm not alone in clown world. There's a baseline of information that people understand here that's higher than the people I know in real life, so it's one outlet I guess.\n\nI had the same experience as you when I started gardening, farming chilli peppers mostly, propogating hedges, roses and so on... It's just something that clicked with me. However the choices I've made earlier in life have made it so that my primary income, even though I run my own business comes from working on computers a lot of the time. The one saving grace is that I can decide when to go out into the garden or have a day gardening etc...", "1005" ], [ "Good, Colonialism was a good thing compared to necklacing people in South Africa that goes on to this day.\n\nIf the British and Americans had left the artefacts they found in the middle-east, They would have been destroyed by now. Sorry, it's just reality, I'm sick of denying self evident reality out of fear of offending some historically-ignorant retard.\n\nThe only reason the sphinx and pyramids haven't been destroyed by cultural enrichment is because it takes too much effort and can't be done with a sledge hammer, Like what happened across Syria and Iraq... over retard-tier claims of idolatry about ancient historical sites.", "773" ], [ "Similar along the line of thought, as individuals we should take it upon ourselves to make cultural artefacts for our side, artwork, sculptures etc... Paradigm shift needs high culture too fam.\n\nMaterials for framing, sculpting etc... to the cement, sand and other information can be bought relatively cheap, it's the effort that makes the art.", "889" ], [ "There are different checkboxes being ticked for various Western countries.\n\nI have legitimately started looking for houses in Hungary and Poland to get an idea for the finances needed. Just in case.\n\nBut when you get blackpilled, or start to think it's over, that's when they win. If you can stay strong mentally and productive with a positive energy outlook, Momentum for change can occur.", "1004" ], [ "Holy shit I need to read more <PERSON>... How the hell was he so on point? How is it even possible to encapsulate the modern bugman? - actually saying that, It's the standard lifecycle of every rising and falling society in history.\n\nThe attitude he describes, is the exact phenomenon explained when we see <PERSON>'s 1984 or <PERSON>'s Brave New World being enacted by governments and individuals willingly, Whilst their works were the equivalent of <PERSON>'s warnings, this is encapsulated with the usual \"It was supposed to be a warning, Not an instruction manual.\"", "520" ], [ "I try to be positive but this is a whole other level of tyranny. I don't even know how to articulate it... he was reporting trials that were going on and was dragged away and incredibly quickly given 13 months. - a potential life threatening term, given the prison population of the UK and his notoriety.\n\nThey are taking everything, every figure head, every movement, every outlet. They would be shooting people if they had the power to do so. At what point do people say they've had enough?\n\nWhat disheartens me so much, Is that the people responsible will more often than not go to bed thinking that they're the good guys. Whilst the country crumbles around their manufactured perception of reality and false hero egos.", "279" ], [ "Thanks for the kick when down bud.\n\nI am not a clairvoyant, Had I known they would fall to this level, I'd have kept my mouth shut. I've never seen the British government be this harsh before.\n\nIt's just terrible. I can't really elucidate it. I'm just genuinely tired that I never ever hear my country doing anything even remotely positive.\n\nI've never snarked about America being worse either like you're portraying. I love America and the Americans. We're literally cousins by blood. I've always and only said that America and Britain are being attacked in different ways and along different avenues. \n\nCherish your constitution never let it go, never let it be modified, as it's the only shield that is holding back the poisonous hydra consuming my nation. If my homeland is truly lost, I may end up seeking refuge like the Britons of the 17th Century to the USA. I know that family members of mine from the 18th Century moved out there to Pennsylvania.\n\nedit: I should clarify, I am not blackpilled, After some reflection I believe this will be a streisand effect and PR disaster for the tyrants. We must remember we are ahead of the curve of information to normies. But it always trickles down eventually. Stiff upper lip, I guess. Patience and working on changing the culture via memes, comedy, entertainment etc... is still a real tool to manipulate change in the long run. Godspeed chaps.", "579" ], [ "It's like being trapped in an asylum where the lunatics have taken over. Every other week I'm staggered at the new echelon of low that is discovered, by people of all levels of government allowing it to fall to.\n\nIt staggers me that police officers from working class backgrounds can go to bed at night and think they're being the good guys, \"but they're just following orders\" never heard that one before...", "279" ], [ "Another Brother war? No.\n\nBy the way, YOU'RE A CONSPIRITARD! the great replacement is just a tinfoil hat plan, idiot. Even though the numbers, the statistics, the admitted political motives and talking heads saying it's happening, whilst headlines like this are found almost daily... You're just a conspiracy clown like <PERSON> who isn't controlled opposition to discredit legitimate right wing concerns. hahahaha, try again sweaty.", "827" ], [ "Intermittent Fasting, Lift heavy and low reps until you can't any more. Then lift lighter until failure. Get adequate rest. Eat Olive Oil and Eggs and plenty of cruciferous vegetables. Repeat for about 12 months = Makings of Ubermensch body.\n\nRead your history and culture, Learn their languages even if ancient -hell learn Italian, German or Russian. Understand your ancestors plight and how you arrived at where you are because of them. Reject Multikulti globohomo clown world that wants you to be a part of a grey mass, Don't rely on technology and keep your brain sharp, learn something new every day = Ubermensch Mindset\n\nIf you're self employed work hard and aim for 15 hours a day if you're in your 20s with that energy. Build something great, write a book, work towards something that is permanent improvement. For example, if you're an architect, Design a building that your great grandchildren can be proud of, that you made. Take pride in your environment, even if it means gardening and assisting nature. = Ubermensch Productivity.\n\nSet your goals as high as possible but be pragmatic. Always mentally prepare for opposition.\n\nOur side will win inevitably because our side works hard and has the science, statistics, acheivements and hopefully aesthetics when the time comes. We already have the memes and most of youtube sympathetic. Patience güys. Patience.", "306" ], [ "America and UK were built on Anglo-saxon and Celtic blood, sweat and steal, but the world deserves to use our countries like buffet tables!\n\nYou should go over to the capital city of Pakistan or something become mayor, because that would happen. Or go over to a South American city, and become a mayor or something there instead if you don't like what's happening! <PERSON> is winning against <PERSON> and there's nothing you can do about it sweaty!", "579" ], [ "I literally don't know who or what you're referencing. \n\nI guess if one retard with shit optics says something, it must be bad, completely wrong or by default incorrect then, retard says 2+2=4, you're gonna say otherwise? In fact, you're totally right, I should allow your shaming language -tactic of the left for literally decades, to undermine ideas I came to hold after great struggle and stress on my own, and organically. My reasoning is based on scientific data, crime statistics and self evident reality of living in a homogenous society.\n\n\"Alt right\" lol, that boogeyman. Conservative is more honest. 50 years ago it was normal conservative talking points. I want to conserve my country, my heritage, what my ancestors left me and my people. So right wing conservative is literally accurate.\n\nNo matter how much you try, you won't make me hate. I'm not the caricature you've been brainwashed with. The outrage is repressed by a vocal and powerful minority, but when push comes to shove, the average man on the street you pass daily, Agrees with me... there's nothing anyone with any sort of money, corrupt ties or power will be able to do when he says he's had enough... and some people think that Brexit and electing <PERSON> was them saying they're not happy? lol. Try talking to your opposition like human beings instead of the evil villain you've painted. Paradigm is shifting and there's nothing that can stop that now.", "965" ], [ "I've often wondered how many diseases and illnesses are passing through because it's \"racist\" to check people now.\n\nHow many people with TB have crossed the border for example? \n\nIt's one of the reasons that <PERSON> got knocked down a notch in my books to being just a bit better than a normie, he was arguing in parliament that a racist statement was made and virtue signalled about it being horrible and disgraceful etc... Whilst not addressing the core of the point. -That comment was about diseases and illnesses spreading into Europe via the mass migration wave. The man who said it, was apparently related to some fascist group or something, So therefore what he said must have been outrageous simply because of the source from which it came... When it was a valid point. I don't care if the Pope, <PERSON> himself or some Eskimo taking a shit in the sea said it, Illnesses and disease are likely to cross the border if nobody is being checked for good health.\n\n\"I'm sorry that argument is invalid because a poopy head said it. Hahahahah. Let them in.\"", "678" ], [ "Your media says we don't have guns. It's simply not true.\n\nOur speech is culturally enriched in public now so obviously it's taken a back seat, but in private venues etc... it's still absolute.\n\nMonarchs if used in accordance of a strong society are more stable forms of government than elected and bribable politicians. This has taken a down turn from WW1 onwards.\n\nOne thing I don't understand about people like you is, Are you a shill or just a nihilist? or something else? because instead of presenting a unified front to the world and having each other's backs. There seems to be a lot of divisive comments like this.\n\nIt's the equivalent of a guy pointing and laughing at his brother's boat sinking whilst his own is taking on water. Rather than working together there's pointing and laughing, snark and other bullshit. Which will ultimately end in the ending of both parties.", "593" ], [ "\"ultra right wing\"\n\nThe limitless hyperbole and boundless shakespearean hysterics.\n\nthe dude literally retweeted some funny but offensive memes...\n\nRepeat a lie often enough and people just believe it apparently is how these people live. <PERSON> and the rest of them should be able to sue the fuck out of the media outlets for this level of defamation. It's getting to the point where even I have a problem with it.", "272" ], [ "Unironically crowd fund and pooling skills -engineers, architects, fishermen, farmers, hunters and builders too. Buy massive oil tanker or freight transporter, empty hull out, Fill with crew space, hydroponic solar farming, solar panels and modern renewable tech, flat packed or prefab buildings. Sail to unclaimed part of Antarctica, establish new state, Global warming makes climate temperate and arable. Live rest of lives in peace.\n\nDrones for recon and site picking. Possibly even machinery to go subterranean to insulate from extreme temperature fluctuation.\n\nWhilst initial buildings are being constructed, solar hydroponic farming aboard the ship combined with caught fish and ration packs would feed crew.\n\nSatilite internet for global connection.", "78" ], [ "Looks like Mount and Blade Fire and Sword to me, Could be wrong though. Looks like it could be the Sands of Faith mod.\n\nProbably one of the best RPGs on PC. In M & B warband you can start off with nothing, but by being loyal to a monarch or being a raider etc... you can recruit men to join you in battle. Then if you so choose, Forge your own Kingdom. Pretty dated visuals but the gameplay is literally top tier. It's the chadest rpg.\n\nLast character I created fought in arenas as a gladiator, kicked ass and got stronger, became a wealthy leader of men, recruited a large army of peasants and raided enemies, then when they were strong enough I invaded the Sarranid Sultanate capital and made him King of a new nation dangerous time sink if you don't have any other hobbies.", "368" ], [ "Britain and America literally invented everything and anything worth a shit and combined have been hegemonic powers for about 500 years... built by our ancestors Saxon-Celtic and Germanic alike, but yeah, step asside sweaty, me and my gay retard posse calling you names and slandering is enough to shut down your movement and undermine your greivances, god I'm such a good person.", "773" ], [ "It's just the pathological altruism combined with high access to resources in his case, in my opinion.\n\nI don't think <PERSON> is one of those sorts of people - I could be wrong, But he probably just thinks he's doing the right thing to help Africa out of squalor. A form of \"white man's burden\" upon himself.\n\nI've heard all sorts of reasons as to why Europeans are more altruistic, like it evolving from having to cooperate to survive during the Ice Age, but this attitude continued into the modern multikulti era where it's not repaid both ways... and outright exploited. The reality is, for all the shaming about how \"intolerant\" and basically evil, that white Americans and British people are for wanting to limit immigration etc... They're quite literally some of the most tolerant people on the planet. Their good nature is exploited by those that should know better. Combine this with an already softening population and lower testosterone levels, You have clown world manifesting itself.", "1020" ], [ "Who's the Greek who built Buckingham Palace?\n\nI kid, I understand that they had a role. The Romano-British combining with the Angles and the Saxons made some pretty big brained nibbas though. The concept of modern Western Civilization is literally an Anglo saxon thing, going back to the Magna Carta as the milestone and example foundation of Liberty. That's why the Americans have a copy of the Magna Carta alongside their Bill of Rights.\n\nFuck, typing that out made me angry and depressed, how could our boomers let it fall this far?", "773" ], [ "Reminder he's the only guy who actually lives by what he says online. Has huge family, lives self sufficiently or at least working towards it. Homeschools but still memes.\n\nThe counter-vargnalling is indicative of shill entryism. \n\nWe should ignore the true european cultures, HATE THE EUROPEAN CULTURES!!! because that's how we win güys! The only faiths and their values güys, just divide even more güys!!!! I wonder why the \"\"\"christian leaders\"\"\" are doing nothing to stop globohomo clown world? is it because they're subservient to other interests? Go back to sleep.", "633" ], [ "*Understanding the title;*\n\nPopulism = Concerns of the ordinary man.\n\nNationalism = Concerns for the good of the nation.\n\nIdentity politics = Knowing your culture and heritage and where you come from.\n\n#*... and here's why those are bad things and you should be homogenous grey mass of consumerism.*\n\nOnly one that is potentially negative or neutral is \"tribalism\" because it can be mindless and the author conflates them all as being one... \n\nWe need to open the borders and save the west by injecting hormones into teenagers. Somalians wearing maga hats = win win!!", "68" ], [ "Are these people from orphanages or something? Like, does the thought never cross their mind \"what if <PERSON> saw this?\" ... Do these people never have the self awareness? For fuck's sake I know they take dick for money so they have no shame, But pretend to atleast have some sort of self respect.\n\nThe idea that these people get more eyes and attention than almost anything else, Is also a damning indictment on the state of the modern Man.", "282" ], [ "Right wing populism is coming lads and it's fuel will be this sort of shit hitting the ordinary working class in their timelines and news feeds, autists should use this shit to carpet bomb redpills. There's no way to make ordinary people accept this. Put this horrific ideology vs monarchism for example on a ballot and you'd see. This sort of literal societal cancer is being produced and distributed by a very small minority of the worst fart huffing nihilists, they will dig their hole with their hubris.\n\nLol and to think people in the media act like the newly elected religious conservatives in Italy are edgy. I've never been really religious but this stuff makes me wish or hope that God is real and that divine justice against evil will ultimately happen.\n\nThe key is getting people who are good at making memes and graphics to distribute it effectively.", "827" ], [ "The whole idea that children are expensive is myth too, pushed by consumerist interests to make you buy expensive shit, whilst also effecting the birth rates. If you have a full time stay at home parent, Yes you'll technically earn less, but you'll be able to look after your children cheaper. \n\nI don't have a child, but I want a big family one day 4-8 children hopefully and so I decided to research the shitlib talking points to be \"child free\". For example, one of the things stated often is that \"diapers / nappies\" are so expensive now! Solution to that; the traditional method of folding cloth diapers which are literally buy once, wash and reuse. They ignore it on purpose, A stay at home mum or dad for example could do that easily.\n\nBaby food being expensive argument; Simply cook the same meal for your child as the adults (obviously within reason) and blend it up in a food processor. I found out my Grandma and Mum did this, So if we had chicken and vegetables for dinner, they'd make a baby portion of it and blend it up into mush.\n\nAs long as you're not treating your child like a fashion accessory \"aw, he's got to have the latest air jordans n sheeeit and iPhone 45-S XL\", It quite literally is bullshit about how expensive children are. Only barrier is the immigrant population compressing wages and taking up houses, Which makes it harder to own your own house, but not impossible.", "198" ], [ "Asside from the political implications, They're daytime adverts too, from bingo to poker too. It makes me sick. There are literally bingo adverts on programmes like the <PERSON> show (British <PERSON> basically).\n\nHow is it the UK has libertarian \"let people do as they please\" in regards to this sort of shit, but is inconsistent when they're throwing people in prison for jokes and journalism?\n\nAnother example, as if the UK has \"selective liberty\" or something, You can get firearms after filling the paperwork in and getting a proper safe, even though they are pretty strict with how you use them -hobbyist, hunting etc... Yet you're just allowed to pick out suppressors freely. You can get a full blown Remmy 870 with Suppressor without extra paperwork. Yet in the USA, they are outlawed in some states entirely, yet the guns themselves are easier to get with less paperwork. It's just weird, It's like the Anglo values that founded America are still there but it's like an Oak tree that has Poison Ivy strangling it. You can see the remnants of liberty under the surface, but there was no constitution to help protect it.\n\nI guess the Anarcho-tyranny might be hyperbolic, but it definitely is along that sort of path.", "651" ], [ "Glad to see some people get the 15 hour work day mindset fam. In my opinion you should get a trade or build a business in your 20s as a man. Work your ass off while you have the energy. Then later in life it'll be easier and you'll be attractive to good women because you're a good man. Worry about the relationship shit later on as men don't have the \"wall\" to hit.", "429" ], [ "Had a scary encounter that I've never mentioned before, I was walking home from the shop at night and he came running barefoot out of an alleyway, He collared me and started frantically speaking -*\"Have you even read <PERSON>?! A town full of Somalies is going to uphold Anglo values! When Anglos become minority in my lifetime Anglo values will live on! The Liberalistismic way of life is the default state of men when they touch Anglo soil! Jenkem huffers become English tophat stereotypes as soon as the cliffs of dover are crossed! Uphold English values and preserve Albion by giving it all away to the world!\"*\n\nHe then slapped foot back into the dark yelling about dinosaurs and chuckling as he ran deeper into the darkness.\n\nVery scary. I subbed to his channel shortly after. I found it inspirational tbqhwyf.", "980" ], [ "He's a classical liberal that thinks those values will exist in Britain when British natives are inevitably made a minority by current birth trends and demographic momentum, Within his own life time. Even though some departments in the UK government have cultural enrichment running them and we're 88% native, yet rights and values are already being bent, broken and out right destroyed.\n\nHis demeanor comes across to me as someone who is so obviously more woke than he's letting on, but he doesn't want to be painted as a villain for his wokeness, so he has this behavior of having to deny studies, statistics and biology that contradict his idea of how the world should work. He's a good guy so far as I can tell, Has a bit of an ego lately but seems to genuinely not be able to see it, He got me started on redpills after <PERSON> started - with his eviseration of a soyboy in his \"Philippic against Matt Lees\" when they were fucking with video games. Following the ideological breadcrumbs back to their source... 4 years later nearly and I've found my political rooting.\n\nThe reality is the only way classical liberalism will work is with nativism, but to admit that only Anglo countries are and were Classically Liberal, undermines his JBP-lite schtick. It also would concede ground to the people he personally dislikes more than the truth about the ideas.\n\n<PERSON> doesn't seem to like <PERSON> very much, but I think what <PERSON> says is kind of true in a way, Not denigrating <PERSON> or his efforts, But I think it's true that his viewers wanted actual solutions and so they outgrew him if that makes any sense. The guy's so selectively woke though.", "211" ], [ "Exactly, <PERSON> = letting them win.\n\nIt's a relatively new culture, but people get nihilistic because they were born into it, it's all they know, because they're young. It doesn't have to be like this.\n\nIf our ancestors could see us or speak to us, They would agree with our side, because this degenerate postmodern culture is a blip in the span of world history and can be brought down as it was built up.\n\nWhen we win, There will be statues to remember the victims of globohomo clown world.\n\nThe corrupt boomers who caused this will get old and our side is more competent than the pozzed-left, so it's just a matter of time. Be patient, get fit, stay healthy, keep reading your literature and be a positive and constructive role model. Enough men doing that will have momentum to change our societies for the better.", "871" ], [ "Good post, wholesome and helpful. Thanks bud.\n\nAs for medical costs, forgot about that for America, but they are negligable because I pay my taxes fam. I live in a gay-communist nation where the hospitals are actually pretty good for now.\n\nIf my businesses go well before I have a family, I'll definitely set up a private healthcare thing too just incase.\n\nI'm pretty woke on the baby-formula question versus natural milkers, with the soy and additives etc...", "661" ], [ "*(driver lights cigarette from flip lighter, looks into rearview mirror, slow pulsing synthwave track in background bassline)*\n\n**\"So Dr.<PERSON>, Good to see you and everything, big fan of your work, But let's be completely authentic for a second, What is the dragon that needs slaying in our society? I think I'm ready.\"**\n\n*(there's a few second pause, eye contact in mirror)*\n\n**\"Finally someone asked.\"**\n\n[*(cuts to black title card, synthwave track drops into full rhythm and beat)*](_URL_0_)", "481" ], [ "Imagine unironically thinking that being able to create life is not empowering or worth something. That being a career drone or trying to compete with men in the workplace is more empowering than literally being able to carry and create life. This nihilistic culture is everywhere.\n\nAlthough she'd probably be a shit parent anyway given that post, but most likely she's a white woman who's been programmed by the culture to think that's normal. Have fun growing old and alone in your twilight years because husbands tend to die before their wives.\n\nI understand the idea of being \"pro-choice\" and choosing but to be actively say you're \"pro-abortion\" is vile to me.", "674" ], [ "> You can still go since nothing you run into is going to change your mind.\n\nThis is true, I'm going to go back to become a structural engineer / architect now I have found an appreciation for Europe's beautiful traditional buildings.\n\nOnce red pilled, you're inoculated against globohomo clown world. Conceal your power level, get your qualifications, ?????, ????? and win.", "829" ], [ "Why do these people always cuck out? Every. Single. Time.\n\nNever apologise, In fact double down with the humour and release the thing. You'd make a ton of sales through notoriety as Steam has pledged to not censor the marketplace -since that game Hatred, letting the free market decide. So what was the issue?\n\nSome retards got offended at some jokes. Wow. Definitely worth sinking the capital that was poured into it, what a piss poor business decision -indicative of Low T, because now they've alienated everyone. Yeah, some screaming pink hair and soylet article writers are suddenly going to purchase your games now.\n\nHell if they released it and got vilified by the media, I'd buy a copy just to support the developers and to say \"fuck you\" to the glorified bloggers. - Tell me I'm wrong that you wouldn't too?", "342" ], [ "I'm usually not as harsh about these things but does nobody else see the genuine tragedy in the photo? The bloody video games are framed as to imply they're more important that his son, that his son is a background object to the main event of the video games. You couldn't make it better if someone straight up photoshopped a depth of field blur over his child whilst keeping the video games sharp. - feel free to do that if you've got the ability.\n\n\nMen need a higher purpose for god's sake and in the modern culture it's totally bereft.\n\n\nThe absolute state of bugmanry.", "921" ], [ "They can fuck you in the USA for alimony and child support for cohabitation too.\n\nIn the UK and USA both they've been known to throw out prenuptial agreements. This is why my standards for a trad wife who won't fuck me over are high.\n\nI want a family but I realise that \"powers that be\" are putting hurdles in the way of that goal.\n\nIt's one of the reasons I don't shit on the MGTOW types, because I've known men in my own life who were absolutely decimated by the state and family courts. From \"You can never ever see your child because the mother said so, But you still need to pay for them and pay the mortgage\" to \"Oh, your favourite relatively new car on a hire purchase? That's your wive's now even though she fucked you over\".\n\nCertain demographics have turned the process of divorce into an industry in and of itself.", "83" ], [ "They're autistic, gamers and uneducated? Sounds accurate and charitable tbh. Uneducated glumpf supporters blown the fuck out.\n\nUnlike the ever increasing degenerates, pozzed and \"gender studies educated\" bug men and screeching pink hairs who oppose them.\n\nJust wait until they put 'em in Gamer internment camps. guys it's call of duty time, don't let them uninstall your hobby from this reality. rise up ✊", "342" ], [ "That apprehension and doubt they have when questioning right and wrong is supposed to be is where a guy can do his own \"shit-test\".\n\nIf you just asserted that they're fucking themselves up and what they're doing is wrong, they'd argue and probably yell, but from my own experience with these sorts of women, they'll either reject what you say and they're a lost cause or they'll later become infatuated with you, which is awkward when you're polite and don't want to call them a trash heap to their face because of their track record prior. \n\nThat's why I don't understand why some men who are by most standards good people are literally intimidated by basic thots.", "971" ], [ "Lol a future cat lady almost guaranteed neurotic thot mocking wholesome trad woman.\n\nThat's like a guy who's walking along the sidewalk and treads in dog shit, pointing and laughing at a Ferrari.\n\nIt's like a guy shitting in a dirt hole and laughing at the guy with the Jap-robo-toilet.\n\nIt's like a guy who found a penny laughing at a guy who found a $100 bill.\n\nMaking any sense yet fam?", "702" ], [ "There's also a baseline level of knowledge here that makes for good conversation, Where as if I'm talking to normies even about politics, I have to lay the ground work every time for that conversation, that I had already got through my head 3 years ago. \n\nFor example, a relative of mine when we were talking politics, on their own brought up \"Islam is a religion not a race, so how is it racist to criticise them\", I understand they made progress on their own which is good, but that's shit I got through my head years ago when I went through the typical \"<PERSON>\" phase.\n\nSo you can understand how I can't really go all in talking about postmodernism and it's poisonous interweaving with neo-marxism and it's effects on destroying systems of standards and dignity.\n\nAlthough, that being said about normies, when visiting a hospital wing for a relative in, the entire ward of old ladies and boomer ladies were talking about how <PERSON> was right. -Not joking. I walked into a ward of woke old ladies. It was a whitepill and made me realise that the paradigm is shifting.", "647" ], [ "As I said earlier engineering and architecture, because when we win, we're going to need those skills. \n\nHowever, Don't pick something that you have no passion at all for. I love European architecture so I am going into engineering and architecture, to contribute to that myself.\n\nSTEM in general is pretty good. Soft sciences and humanities are compromised entirely by leftists.\n\nThen again, if it's military college it might be better.", "907" ], [ "Lol, You guys need a TV liocense! Lol wot about a spoon loicense!\n\nOh by the way, Literally anyone from any part of the world who passes-by can elect our leaders. Oh and sometimes special taxes for simply being self employed and also needing business licenses.\n\nFor real tho;\n\n#\\#EndAngloDivision\n\n#\\#BothSidesOfThePond\n\n\n#🤡🌍🤡🌍 ^🤡🌍🤡🌍 ^🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍 ^^**🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍** ^^^🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍 ^🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍 *^^^🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍 ^🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍 ^^🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍🤡🌍*", "579" ], [ "I think the tolerance is running out though, seeing people come out with stuff that would suprise me. Old ladies even talking about <PERSON>. \n\nSoon it will dawn on people that the economy being an excuse is not acceptable, that there are things more important than GDP.\n\nThe one place I think may be genuinely screwed is Germany if they don't turn it around soon, because they aren't even allowed to be nationalistic without being dragged away for \"illegal opinions\". At least in the UK we have nationalist parties and some new ones popping up, Including ancient orders like High Toryism gaining momentum because of clown world.", "725" ], [ "The people who make these things must unironically be social geniuses on an analytical level or some shit. It takes a genuinely decent amount of witt to encapsulate the average leftists' brainwashing with that sort of brevity, whilst making the point and making it funny too. It's like the purest form of meme.\n\n\nSome retard postmodernist with his 500 page sophistry about why we need to be culturally enriched for our sins gets BTFO with an autist and MSPaint.", "965" ], [ "I've seen people theorise that feminism is just a giant shit-test by young women. \n\nBut it's a form of gaining company in misery for the old munters who've hit the wall or make no effort, like the fat pink hairs.\n\nThe number of feminists who outright say they wouldn't date or marry a \"male feminist\" re-enforces that theory. That it's a darwinian way to weed out betas and orbiters. You think a male feminist is going to strangle a burglar with his bare hands if need be at 3am? whilst guarding his family and home. Nah.", "278" ] ]
256
[ 12414, 727, 3939, 15186, 18533, 9268, 15207, 13961, 6438, 10593, 10957, 9041, 4262, 16804, 1339, 4892, 7844, 10859, 13652, 16601, 18291, 13923, 7970, 20698, 2131, 8243, 21220, 23310, 25202, 12411, 17609, 22456, 23351, 21778, 3817, 1551, 4252, 16557, 91, 16399, 23467, 10688, 20615, 16996, 23580, 4526, 19156, 22062, 9567, 15994, 4552, 8533, 1514, 742, 493, 8235, 18461, 9124, 1156, 3131, 17016, 12846, 19376, 16108, 10991, 489, 12062, 13246, 4105, 1062, 24807, 11326, 20012, 9308, 15215, 25200, 7280, 10118, 1337, 1819, 20613, 15707, 5678, 25164, 25064, 1463, 12575, 10992, 21425, 17290, 24572, 11626, 10895, 11191, 18481, 4839, 9617, 5425, 17397, 6141, 3813, 1650, 16468, 4273, 12705, 6606, 4971, 10280, 5221, 12251, 6373, 16462, 3806, 4732, 3956, 17259, 5261, 13084, 12465, 8502, 4136, 17052, 7848, 2336, 16267, 23568, 10725, 9151, 24663, 20962, 10501, 204, 10872, 6652, 14118, 15102, 13746, 22784, 11773, 17481, 8158, 10743, 4507, 5357, 8919, 20323, 24950, 21164, 10389, 22225, 3247, 20210, 18197, 19287, 8879, 17701, 14350, 6226, 7684, 2, 9936, 13129, 6005, 11556, 22948, 22495, 7436, 2989, 9958, 1800, 13014, 12921, 10282, 6108, 24556, 24633, 6276, 13181, 19034, 11570, 17761, 2392, 13761, 11983, 1149, 21562, 14436, 11569, 21932, 12140, 12724, 15295, 24318, 29, 20230, 16152, 10230, 1920, 21811, 923, 9028, 11157, 25020, 171, 5859, 13950, 18302, 13228, 18865, 8238, 15085, 21100, 24716, 8591, 15478, 834, 7464, 1306, 17875, 2233, 24901, 11378, 9791, 427, 7400, 24497, 15221, 9885, 13, 17802, 4735, 2966, 13436, 24474, 5874, 16104, 922, 21096, 21663, 5478, 762, 14545, 7975, 4996, 10513, 10022, 19127, 72, 19598, 24763, 8922, 7435, 5072, 1704, 1621, 3406, 23064, 5285, 7273, 8246, 10226, 6590, 21782, 8537, 16102, 22879, 2078, 3483, 10011, 22740, 13664, 15522, 7486, 13520, 25021, 313, 7255, 11063, 12289, 17212, 2142, 14188, 8040, 8581, 21153, 7977, 2304, 20828, 42, 6569, 15579, 13867, 23203, 3993, 3572, 21985, 20649, 13428, 17337, 23054, 4836, 2134, 2772, 17199, 23902, 8216, 25493, 1423, 11021, 2467, 15634, 23736, 13240, 18047, 3970, 23172, 11619, 11534, 17132, 25248, 18540, 23685, 5390, 4215, 10741, 5841, 14526, 10548, 14782, 10215, 20329, 10303, 15916, 1214, 15570, 1461, 14855, 6471, 21036, 7799, 287, 14807, 10376, 23928, 11839, 23616, 19968, 11198, 11909, 1691, 9078, 20039, 2188, 16019, 2145, 20800, 25213, 13095, 22020, 10040, 6244, 23663, 14316, 3522, 8847, 3815, 4638, 13057, 20457, 3390, 1586, 10667, 7347, 5789, 15494, 1370, 11758, 7787, 7567, 13316, 23227, 11851, 10479, 846, 12916, 8508, 6237, 18160, 9677, 18436, 10497, 14667, 5441, 2363, 11399, 22173, 22576, 6644, 25463, 6633, 23856, 13374, 14150, 10842, 12607, 16497, 14539, 13822, 15210, 9221, 21151, 17243, 14258, 20483, 612, 25468, 10827, 19243, 15890, 8417, 11853, 7036, 6123, 17668, 1951, 10328, 830, 3999, 20387, 4941, 11023, 21450, 6741, 2970, 15343, 4796, 4902, 19636, 13954, 4952, 9537, 6191, 7539, 6122, 2783, 14105, 23151, 6962, 6233, 5247, 18552, 3264, 20755, 6642, 8695, 20288, 11755, 22905, 23735, 14658, 1700, 25037, 25180, 15206, 17258, 11216, 22022, 10980, 9279, 1093, 4213, 5808, 23280, 115, 10581, 19256, 23174, 21875, 19027, 25538, 10994, 25071, 2721, 8511, 10272, 1708, 14494, 7930, 24627, 18042, 16912, 19437, 14393, 21970, 6685, 23288, 4826, 6953, 8626 ]
reddit_dump_-Karakui
[ [ "At what point does the game register destruction of monsters in battle? So, for example, I have an Aromage Cananga on the field, alongside Aroma Garden and a face-up Dried Winds. My opponent attacks Cananga with Star Eater, which can't be affected by card effects until the end of the damage step. Cananga is destroyed, triggering Aroma Garden's effect, restoring 1000 life to me, and triggering Dried Winds' effect, which destroys 1 face-up monster. Will Star Eater be destroyed by dried winds, or does this chain resolve still in the damage step?", "991" ], [ "I think it's very unlikely. Maybe a 10% chance of happening? At least from what I've observed. Most decks are doing perfectly well even with just 15 cards. I mean, Zoodiacs lose most of their ED on archetypal cards and still make up at least 75% of all winning decks in the OCG, which is way more than their fair share, so it doesn't look like they really need extra space. I've never had a deck in which I realistically *need* more than 15 extras, and something quite a few people seem to forget is that you can also put ED cards in your side deck if you want to switch up your techs.", "471" ], [ "Ok, here's what I've come to view as true over my course of complaining:\n\nCards, no matter how strong, are not the problem. It's the powercreep that is. Lets take a look at Kaijus as an example, since they're the ones I dislike the most. Kaijus allow you to instantly defeat even the strongest of monsters. This can be absolutely devastating to decks; you can wipe out 3 turns of work in a single move. However, this isn't actually what happens. Because of how quickly most decks can churn out monsters, and how easily they can recover, <PERSON> can be defeating as little as one third of a turn's work. If the game was less powercrept, <PERSON> would be broken, but would never have been created either. As it is now, they're a necessary evil. \n\nThe same is true of things like Anti-spell - this would not be a problem in a slower format.", "535" ], [ "All cards go at the same time. I'm assuming you want to trigger some kind of card effect in response to Rainbow Dragon (maybe your field spell lets you draw 1 when a monster leaves the field, for example). The returning effect is all one action, so card effects can only be activated in response if they're chained to the initial activation of the effect (ie, after the cost has been paid but before the effect has resolved). The only chance to activate effects after the chain has already begun resolving is after all the cards have been returned to the deck. Basically, you can't activate anything if an effect is in the middle of resolving (RD would still be resolving while returning cards, so nothing can be activated until every card has left the field).", "922" ], [ "Nah, this is a mistake quite a few people make, but Pendulum itself isnt a problem. I actually quite enjoy the mechanic, it rejuvinates many decks. The problem was some of the individual decks that just happened to use Pendulum. They did bad card design, not bad mechanic design. This is an important distinction to make, because without it, someone looking at Dragon Rulers could say Xyz in its entirety was a mistake, rather than the few decks abusing it were.", "535" ], [ "Imo D-barrier isn't too much of a problem for Cybers. They pick Fusion? Just go Infinity. They pick Xyz? just go Chimeratech. They're one of the few decks capable of getting around barrier. But anyway:\n\nThanks for the PSCTing!\n\nThese are pretty nice cards, although honestly I dont think I'd use them. The extra deck is better filled by fusions, xyz and tech. Also, the level 8 synchro is difficult to summon on its own, so maybe allow the Tuner to decrease levels too. Additionally, the level 8 synchro has difficult to understand text. It would be better if it says \"Once per turn, you can special summon this card (from your extra deck) by sending 1 \"Cyber Dragon Impulse\" you control to the graveyard (this special summon is treated as a synchro summon)\". \n\nAnd finally: Technically, there's no need to put \"or \"Cybernetic\" \" on Cybernetic Foundry, since \"Cybernetic\" still contains \"Cyber\", meaning it can be searched by any card that says \"one \"Cyber\" spell/trap card\".\n\nSide-note: All Cyber Dragon Xyz have 2100 base ATK and 1600 base DEF, so it'd be a little more thematic if the Synchros did too. Arc Flash is going to gain stupendous amounts of ATK straight away anyway, so this won't change much (it'll have at least +600 when summoned, and more likely +1200 if you draw right or have discarded for Galaxy Soldiers).", "344" ], [ "As <PERSON> says, Exodia isn't efficient enough and is very lucky. It's also very sacky, so feel free to play it but don't expect anyone to like it, or to play against you casually. Exodia is ***boring***, so I really don't recommend it. It's boring for anyone playing against you because whether they win becomes entirely dependent on whether or not you're lucky. It also needs absolutely zero skill to play, which means you'll get bored of it too. You don't want to waste money on a deck that you'll use 3 times then dismantle and throw into random drawers.", "344" ], [ "Good point. Does need you to go first, though. And as the earlier parts of this thread point out, Ghostricks can be stopped really easily without harming the zoodiac's plays at all, with continuous effects no less, not the one-turn nature of D-barrier. Draw a perfect hand and go first is pretty much the only way I can see of beating <PERSON> with ghostrick.", "183" ], [ "Even if you do, no one else does. They're boring to play against. Good players of any game make the game fun for all players involved. Also, activating draw power cards in sequence does not count as \"combo\". Equipping a Magical Library with Wonder Wand and Bamboo Sword then churning through spell cards is something anyone could do with zero practice or talent. If you want a combo deck, look at something like D/D/D. Just deck cycling doesn't count as \"combo\" anymore. It may be a combo in MTG because you have mana to manage. it actually takes deckbuilding skill to be able to draw your entire deck in MTG. That's not the case for yugioh. It's so simple that you can netdeck it perfectly.", "344" ], [ "Draw power ain't gonna do it, though. Since your decklist only actually contains 1 or 2 of each card, and your perfect hand is still *really* easy to beat, whether or not you win is currently based entirely on you getting great luck while your opponent simultaneously gets abysmal luck. Rather than attempting to luck into drawing exactly the cards you need on a 1 in 40 chance (2.5%), you should add multiple copies of cards, which would increase that to 7.5% per draw. Then you need to look at running cards with a 100% chance of searching the exact card you're looking for, rather than giving you an additional 7.5% chance. The reason most meta decks are so good is because they can search perfectly.", "535" ], [ "Nah, Shaddoll Fusion isn't too bad. You can only activate it once, so you're still only ending up with +3, and on top of that, it only works if you're going second. Since you can only go into <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> or <PERSON> with it currently, it's not enough to respond to your opponent's first turn of board establishment anymore. <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON> are all there to shut down your opponent's plays, and <PERSON> has the attack power of a Kuriboh so she ain't breaking anything any time soon. It was Shaddoll Fusion combined with Construct that allowed <PERSON> to respond with so much power. \n\nAnd El Shaddoll Fusion was limited because it let any of your shaddolls completely avoid destruction, negation, banishing and bouncing effects, while still getting you a +1.", "456" ], [ "Yep, pretty much. If your DS is an older model (eg DSL or DSI) then you can probably get an R4 card for it, which will allow you to play all the DS and GBA games for only the price of the R4 card (though do a lot of research if you do do this, because many cards are shit and just break). I haven't played the PSP games, but I've heard they're better than the DS games. The first 2 or 3 Tag Force games are probably GX and earlier cards, and Spirit Caller and Nightmare Troubadour are the DS games with GX and earlier and DM only cards, respectively. Spirit Caller only does up to the end of <PERSON>'s arc though, so you don't get any of the later GX stuff like Crystal beasts.", "890" ], [ "**13th Hour in the Haunted Mansion** Continuous Spell\n\nWhen you activate this card, add 1 \"<PERSON>\" field spell from your deck to your hand. Monsters you control can be flip summoned the turn they are Set or Special Summoned face-down. Once per turn, if you Normal Summoned a \"<PERSON>\" monster, or set a monster from your hand this turn, you can special summon 1 \"<PERSON>\" monster from your deck in face-down defense position. Once per turn, if a card that contains \"<PERSON>\" in its card text would be destroyed, you can destroy 1 \"<PERSON>\" monster you control instead (if it is face-down, flip it face-up first, but its effects are not activated). \n\n**Hieratic Seal of Immortality** Field Spell\n\nIf a monster would be tributed, you can tribute 1 \"Hieratic\" monster from your hand or field instead. Once per turn, if you would tribute a monster to activate the effect of a \"Hieratic\" card, you can also tribute \"Hieratic\" monsters from your deck to complete the cost. Once per turn, if you would tribute a monster to activate the effect of a \"Hieratic\" monster, you can also banish \"Hieratic\" monsters from your graveyard to complete the cost. Once per turn, if you control no monsters, you can tribute 1 \"Hieratic\" monster from your hand; add 1 \"Hieratic\" monster with the same level from your deck to your hand. \n\n**Cathedral of Illumination** Field Spell\n\nOnce per turn, you can send the top 3 cards of your deck to the graveyard; special summon 1 level 4 or lower \"Lightsworn\" monster from your hand or graveyard. You must control a \"lightsworn\" monster, or have 2 or more \"Lightsworn\" monsters with different names in your graveyard to activate and resolve this effect. While you control 2 or more \"Lightsworn\" monsters, or have 3 or more \"Lightsworn\" monsters with different names in your graveyard, you can activate effects of \"Lightsworn\" monsters you control that have the condition \"Once per turn, during your end phase:\" during your Main Phase instead. Once per turn, while you have 4 or more \"Lightsworn\" monsters with different names in your graveyard, you can target a number of cards that are banished or in either player's graveyard, up to the number of \"Lightsworn\" monsters with different names in your graveyard; return those cards to your deck. \n\n**Crystal Parthenon** Field Spell\n\n\"Crystal Beast\" monsters in your hand, field, graveyard, deck and extra deck are treated as Pendulum monsters, with pendulum scales of 5 if they are Level 3, or 2 if they are Level 4. If a \"Crystal Beast\" card(s) would be sent from the field to the graveyard, you can place it face-up in your extra deck instead, or place it in your pendulum zone (or place it face-up in your spell/trap card zone as a continuous spell card). Cards you activate that would interact with \"Crystal Beast\" cards in your graveyard can also treat \"Crystal Beast\" cards in your extra deck as if they were in your graveyard. Once per turn, when a \"Crystal Beast\" monster(s) is normal summoned or special summoned to your side of the field, you can add 1 \"Crystal Beast\" monster with a different name from your deck to your hand.\n\nAnd Finally:\n\n**Daring Prison Break** Field Spell\n\nBefore the duel begins, show this card in your deck to your opponent and agree that KOA needs to take certain cards off the banlist, then banish this card face-up. For the duration of the duel, both players decks may contain any of the agreed cards at any of the agreed numbers (max 3). If a judge makes a ruling decision that at least half of the spectators disagree with, ignore that ruling, use your own ruling, then tie that judge to a chair and confiscate his judge license. For the duration of the tournament, you may act as a judge, however, if a real judge corners you and you are unable to convince him you haven't broken any rules, tear this card into tiny pieces.", "961" ], [ "Hm, fair enough. Either way it'd still get abused in pretty much every deck so it needs a condition that says you can only use its renaming effect if you're running a neos deck. Something like \"You can reveal 5 fusion monsters from your extra deck, field, graveyard or that are banished, whose names contain \"Neos\", then target 1 monster on the field; it's name becomes \"Elemental Hero Neos\".\" This way if you do want to use this effect, you have to take up a huge chunk of your extra deck space with otherwise worthless cards, but at the same time since it's taking the fusion cards from anywhere they can physically be, the reveal requirement shouldn't disrupt the Neos deck's ability to still use it even if their extra deck Neos fusions have been reduced to less than 5.", "535" ], [ "Yes it is. It's what it means in PSCT at least, may not be what the creator was intending. Lets say you have a card that says \"If a card you control would be destroyed by battle or by card effect, you can banish this card from your graveyard instead\", for example, {{Hymn of Light}} in your graveyard, and a {{Saffira, Queen of the Dragons}} on the field alongside a {{Ritual Cage}}. Your opponent summons Judgment Dragon then uses its effect. You can't use Hymn of Light's effect in response to this, because thanks to Ritual Cage, Saffira wouldn't be destroyed, meaning the \"this card is about to get destroyed\" condition never becomes fulfilled.", "535" ], [ "Building a deck requires lots and lots of practice and time. Lets start at the beginning (a wonderful place to start):\n\n1. Look up decks that have topped on topdecks. \n\n2. Figure out and learn why each card in those decks are in there (for an easy example, Effect Veiler may be in a deck because it provides instant but continuous negation of all a cards effects). Some techs may be much more difficult to figure out. Watching videos of the deck in action will help.\n\n3. Take all the cards you think are most important to the archetype, and put them in. Then fill up any left over space with staples. Generally speaking, you want most cards at 2 or 3. So Shaddolls for example, need 3 Shaddoll Fusion and 1 El Shaddoll Fusion (preferably 2 or 3 if it wasn't limited to 1), and they can't function without these cards, but they don't need Shaddoll Hound or Curse of the Shadow Prison: they have better options.\n\n4. Playtest the deck. Then playtest it again. Playtest it All of the Times. Every time you find yourself thinking \"Oh damn, I wish I had Card X right now\" or \"I really need to draw Card Y now\", note it down, then put more copies of those cards in your deck. Also, note down all the times you find yourself going \"This is a good card for later, but it's doing more harm than good in my opening hand\" (eg Wulf, Lightsworn Beast), then reduce the frequencies of those cards. Eventually, you'll get a good balance of card numbers. Basically, if you use a card a lot, put as many copies as possible. If you don't use it very often, remove some copies. \n\n5. Keep your deck to maximum 40-42 cards in Main Deck. More cards means a lower chance of drawing the card you need, so there's no point throwing in 3 Mirror Force just in case you need one if you end up topdecking Mirror Force instead of something that lets you start an entire combo. The only time you want 60 cards is if you're playing a Lawnmowing deck (which instantly deposits 20 of those cards into the graveyard anyway)\n\nThis is a general guide for deckbuilding, but different decks have different priorities, and learning a deck inside-out will really speed up the deckbuilding process. A lot of it is just down to experience.", "668" ], [ "Bring a Shaddeidollon deck, go Winda + Caligula and then laugh as you prevent 3 other people from playing their combos!\n\nBut basically, to be the most polite Tag Dueller, ask before you use your partner's cards or activate things that'll prevent them doing anything, and if you have useful cards but won't be able to make anything out of them, set them and let your partner use them to aid their combos.", "344" ], [ "Except when I just googled \"Why is Shaddoll Construct banned\", \"Should shaddoll construct be unbanned\" and the like, it turned out to be everyone else's opinion too. 51:3 for Construct being brought to 1, 2 or 3 on one thread. So, make of that what you will. \n\nAnd just because something was once meta doesn't mean it still will be. Seems someone's forgetting Lightsworn used to be meta. Seems someone's forgetting TeleDAD used to be meta. Get the point?", "621" ], [ "No idea, don't play em. People seem to consider them budget, though, which makes sense. You can by 3 of the latest structure deck, Pendulum Domination, for what, $45? That gives you pretty much your entire main deck, without staples, and a big chunk of the extra deck. Most of the cost is in extra deck and meta staples.", "835" ], [ "Nope. \n\nHonestly, most meta decks are combo decks, just cos you need to do a lot of things in a given turn to establish the board control necessary to win. Blue-Eyes, ABC, True Kings... then you have the Zoodiac and Wind Witch engines too, which are self-closing combos that you can splash into any deck for even more comboing. In fact, Zoodiac combo is so good that every meta deck from now until Zoodiac get banned will be running it.", "344" ], [ "Yep, shaddolls are still casually viable, although they're significantly weakened without Construct. The builds I've had most success with mix them with <PERSON> and co. Your typical objective with Shaddolls is to go first and shut down your opponent's ability to use special summoning: A first turn <PERSON> is really easy to make and stops them using any Xyz or Synchro monsters, and combined with her \"cant be destroyed by card effects\" line, she's relatively difficult to get rid of (assuming your opponent didn't draw into kaijus). Depending on the deck you're up against, Anoyatyllis will stop them using spell/trap effects to special summon (although very few decks do this now), Shekhinaga will allow you to negate the effects of their special summons and Grysta will outright prevent them special summoning. If you're playing Eidolon Shaddolls, you can usually get out a Caligula turn 1 too, which will not only prevent them special summoning but also mean they can only use 1 monster effect each turn, and only conduct battle once per turn, which is really useful for protecting your stuff. \n\nGoing second is much harder without Construct, but not impossible. <PERSON>'s crew really helps a lot here thanks to things like Cocytus and Purgatorio. It's wise to run hand traps so that you're not caught off guard if you go second. If you can recover, then Shaddolls should work fine, but it's all dependent on that recovery. \n\nBiggest thing to look out for? <PERSON> and <PERSON> nerf you too, so if you've got them out, play carefully.", "453" ], [ "Get better country. \n\nYeah same for me, sunlight is bad, but I'm not a big fan of the heat either. The sunlight gives a direct burning sensation which is much less tolerable than general \"i'm hot\". But actually I tend to go on holiday to warmer places (mostly because there aren't very many places colder than England that are still worth visiting), but also because then it's my decision to be there and I don't have the right to complain anymore, which makes it easier to do the traditional British \"shut up and get on with it\".", "891" ], [ "You say that raw potatos won't make you sick, but... \n\nraw potato ferments in your intestines. Have fun with that.\n\nraw potato can contain many pathogens absorbed from the soil. Salmonella and E.coli, for starters. \n\nmatured raw potato contains a substance called solanine which, in extreme cases, results in death. And before you jump on the matured bit - many of the illnesses associated with raw meat only arise once the meat is given time to go off. Just like potatoes. \n\nYes, neanderthals were definitely smart enough to wash fruit. I doubt australopithecus were, considering no apes wash food. However, this is still a form of preparation. If you want to say that anything done by Neanderthals does not count as \"preparation\" then cooking meat doesn't count either because Neanderthals likely did that too. In fact, they are much more likely to have cooked meat than washed fruit. Preparation is to reduce the chance of infection from eating the food, however, waterborne pathogens would have been very prevalent in the age of Neanderthals, and washing fruit may simply have made it more dangerous to consume.", "642" ], [ "Yeah, they do, but it's not capable of conveying detailed information. And while there are times sign language is more useful than verbal, there are also times when verbal is more useful than sign language. Believe it or not, this is why we all default to speech instead of furiously flailing our hands. \n\nJust because non-verbal communication can be useful, it doesn't mean that it's possible to create civilised societies with it alone. In fact, development of complex language is likely to have aided in brain evolution, rather than been a symptom of it. Once you have proper spoken language you begin to need to memorise a huge variety of sounds and meanings, and thus people who can memorise a larger range of words will be more likely to be successful. This is even further boosted by the creation of written language. \n\nNon-verbal communication only aids verbal, it cannot replace it. Also for the record, the majority of non-verbal communication is facial expression anyway, which requires you to be really close to the \"speaker\". Verbal lets you communicate over much longer distances, and in dimly lit areas. Which would be important, as most of the daylight would be dedicated to hunting and gathering and only night time was available for transference of knowledge.", "902" ], [ "Yes I can! So first we'll define \"sense\". This is basically anything that the human body has evolved a specific system for gathering information about.\n\nSo first you have the traditional 5 senses:\n\nSight (Retinas) \nSound (Ear drums) \nTaste (taste buds) \nsmell (nose taste buds) \ntouch (pressure receptors)\n\nNext you have the non-traditional senses (4 of them) \n\nBalance, acceleration (detected by systems in the inner ear) \ntemperature (detected by thermoreceptors) \nProprioception - knowing where all your body parts are at any time (measured by systems inside the brain using information from signals it's sending to motor neurones) \npain (detected by all systems) \n\nFinally, the more dubious internal senses, used for measuring things going on inside the body (not gonna expand on most of this cos pressing enter is hard): \n\nHunger, pulmonary stretch (sensing how much your lungs are inflated), suffocation receptors (measure CO2 levels in the brain and tells you you're suffocating if it gets too high), chemoreceptor trigger zone (measures hormones and other chemicals in the blood), blush receptors (measure vasodilation in skin), intestinal stretch receptors (measure gas content in the gut), receptors in the eusophagus (measure the existence of stuff in the food pipe), receptors in the pharynx that detect foreign objects, receptors that measure dilation of blood vessels, receptors that measure heart activity, and receptors that measure fullness of bladders. \n\nObviously, many of these are still up for debate and can really be fit into other, broader senses. \n\nThere are 3 additional senses that don't have systems specifically detecting them: \n\nTime perception - the brain does actually seem to measure the passage of time. \n\nAgency - the sense that your actions are controlled by yourself (inhibited in many people with schizophrenia)\n\nFamiliarity - different to recollection in that this is the feeling that you've seen something before, rather than the specific memory of having seen it before. Responsible for deja vu.", "595" ], [ "Because the one percent can hire a lot of people to stop the 99% from doing that.\n\nAlso, do you realise what would happen to the world if everyone got an equal share of the 1%'s money? Only one thing: prices of everything would go up and the money would be devalued, and in the end everyone will be in exactly the same state they started in only a little bit worse off because now no one is paying their salary.", "580" ], [ "Because it's the kind of thing that happens a lot, and it can get very frustrating. It's much like small, flying insects. One or two a week you can tolerate. If you're walking into swarms of them every day, you're gonna start getting pissed off. After a while, the person plagued by flies will snap and buy a bug zapper lightsaber, and the person plagued by bad spelling will snap and bang on their keyboard angrily.", "64" ], [ "Exactly! Whenever its sunny I always get criticized for wearing long sleeves: \"you're going to overheat\". \"That's stupid\". I don't care if I'm going to overheat at least it doesn't feel like I'm on fire anymore! \n\nI don't wear sunscreen though, hate the feeling of it on hands and how it gets on everything you touch. I just wear long sleeves if its sunny (actually, since I'm usually wearing a jumper of some kind, I usually do this anyway)\n\nAlso I was doing some research on this a while back (it's called photosensitivity) and sunscreen can actually cause it in the first place :P", "179" ], [ "OK how much are you actually planning to take though? The 1% basically own the world. if they have no money, you have no money because you're employed by them or your customers are. Also, most of their money doesn't exist. It's virtual money in the form of debts. How would you plan on ceasing that virtual money? You can't just break into an estate and steal something that doesn't technically exist (which is the best kind of existence). \n\nThe best way to redistribute wealth into infrastructure and the like is actually what we're already doing - taxes. Taxes are the only way for the 99% to get a cut of the 1%'s virtual wealth. And if the question you next ask is \"Well can we raise taxes on that virtual wealth?\" the answer is \"no\". This is because if you raise that tax, the rich people will simply move the wealth to a country with lower tax - screwing over your country and providing some nice extra money to the new country.", "143" ], [ "Oh yeah definiteyl, tyops are no big deal. Even if you're making dozens of them you can still pretty effectively convet your meaning. And t prove this, I am typing this comment without editing out any of my rypos. However, by doing so I will also be proving another point: Point 3. So without further ado:\n\nPoint 1. Spelling and grammar are very important because they are the language itself. If you misspell enough, or you use incorrect grammar, you can completely change the meaning of your senzence. An example would be a post i saw the other day titled \"If thought could kill, who would have you killed\" (or something to the same purpose). The intention was clearlyt \"I want you to tell me who you would kill with a thought.\" However, the meaning of waht they actually wrote was \"I want you to tell me who would have killed you if thought could kill\". For similar means, spelling is important and can result in misunderstandings, especially considering how many words in English have very similar spellings or pronunciations but completely different meanings (right and rite, for example).\n\nPoint 2. Typos, while not a big deal, still cause problems. They set the tone of the discussion. If I make a comment tht has perfect crammer, and spelling, and no typis, I come across as much more intellectual than I would otherwise. This makes the discussion seem a lot more mature and far reduces the likelihood of the discussion devolving to name calling. Howeve,r if I write exactly the same things but have many typos, it makes me look immature. It makes me look as if I don't care about what I'm writing - as I'm sure you haber obserververd by now with this experimental post: I sound more like a bumbpling fool than someone who knows what they're talking about.", "251" ], [ "Pah, if your mind had really blown, your blood vessel dilation receptors would have triggered and given you a really nasty headache!\n\nBut yeah, biology is awesome. I really like the 21 senses fact. It's really surprising and awesome but at the same time really easy for even non-scientifically minded people to understand. \n\nFun experiment to do with proprioception: Chop off your forearm. Then smack yourself in the face with your stump (so where you hand once was would hit your nose). At full force. You'll instinctively dodge the hand, even though it's not there, because your brain is certain it is, and is still thinking it's sending motor signals to the severed arm.", "461" ], [ "Yes, you could, but that is *very* hypothetical. Because all it takes is one country to go \"no actually guys I think I'm gonna keep my tax rate low\". Now that country might not be getting as much per virtual dollar as the rest, but they do have a hell of a lot more virtual dollars. And I would bet every virtual dollar I have that there are dozens of countries that would do this. Because frankly if the entire world is saying they'll raise tax and I run a country, I would definitely not raise tax. And neither would anyone else. It would be one big game of bluffs. \n\nYep, 100% agree with you there. Earth is fucked and it's our fault. \n\nWe are not accepting the fact that there are ongoing crises because a large portion of the human race believes in the Chosen People thing - they're basically in denial. They've gone \"but we're special, we can't possibly be doomed! And even less by our own actions! We don't want to comprehend this!\"\n\nI think a big part is that people are really really scared. Of everything. Everyone has huge problems in their own life. In comparison, the end of life on Earth seems like a long way off. It seems like the job of those pesky politicians and experts to solve, not the little civilians. And so everyone volunteers to ignore it.", "786" ], [ "Racism is basically impossible to solve all together, but I think once the racist liberals realise the racist conservatives are beginning to die out, and thus they die out too, it'll get OK. The thing with racism is that it's one of the strongest unifiers, in a way, next to sexism. Humans love to fight. Every human wants to find ways to blame other people for their own problems. However, humans also don't like fighting, because fighting is difficult, especially alone. But then along come a group of people who all seem to have very different lives to you. You begin to realise that the people you were fighting against are very similar to you, but you still need someone to blame... and so now it's that new group of people's fault! There will always be tension between groups, whether it's racial, gender-based, political beliefs, country of origin, ancestors, wealth... If you ever learn one thing about humans, it's that it's *never* that human's fault.", "1020" ], [ "But I've been online all day... I guess before I got online, I touched the desk my PC is on, so since that's made of quite light wood, i should be OK. But tbh, I don't like water, and I know how Standard Islands work so I'd probably just build a shelter then hunt some food then wait for the next boat/plane to come by and build a huge SOS sign like in the movies.", "388" ], [ "if you were to give up religion for lent, then would you get it back at the end or give it up forever because you no longer have religion to tell you to end the lent?\n\nAlso I know quite a few non-Christian people who still exercise Lent. It's easier to stick to your guns if lots of people around you are also working hard to give something up, so many people of other religions and no religion at all organise their next diet etc around then.", "529" ], [ "First off, *find someone to read what you write*. There are quite a few online sites for this, and I reckon there'll be a subreddit or two which critiques writing. \n\nSecond, do a *lot* of reading. When you read, your brain is subconsciously absorbing new words and ways of stringing said words together, and before you know it you'll have a much more mature writing style. Probably works best when you have the brain of a child though. You won't pick up writing styles as easily with an adult brain. \n\nIt's not possible to improve what you write, though. If you're already uncreative and boring, you'll probably never become interesting, because it means your imagination wasn't exercised enough as a kid.", "1018" ], [ "Assuming you're OK not playing competitively, you might want to look into Level 7 synchro. Crystal Wing has a little sister called {{Clear Wing Synchro Dragon}}. It has similar effects, but its much weaker. It's pretty good in a synchro matchup though since your opponent's monsters are all going to be level 5 or higher. On that note, Black Rose Moonlight Dragon is a nice bet too. There are a lot of things you can do with level 7s. \n\nCan't tell you much about plant synchro besides \"Aromage are plants and can do synchro\" though.", "128" ], [ "I was playing Civ 6 and screwing around with the new unit stacking thing and my civilisation was separated from the rest of the continent by a 1-tile-think pathway through mountains (the only land-accessible route) so I just set up a double-stacked Swordsman unit in that tile with double stacked Crossbows on every adjacent tile behind it and watched as my opponents (who apparently didn't know how to unit stack) naively threw single-unit after single-unit at it. If it died, I'd just move another doublestacked Swordsman into it, because I could produce and move them faster than they could kill one. \n\nCourse, then they all upgraded to naval warfare and I'd put everything into winning land fights so they completely destroyed me later...", "190" ], [ "I've said it before and I'll say it again. Explain to me how ghosts are possible. I perfectly well understand the difference between lack of evidence and impossible. I am saying there is lack of evidence because there is simply no evidence. I am saying it is impossible because ***the laws of physics do not allow it. there is no way that they could possibly exist within the mathematically established laws of the universe***. And if someone does find evidence? well, I'm glad I'm not a theoretical physicist because they're going to have a hard time reconciling their existence with the existence of all the rest of the universe. \n\nThe thing is though, the laws of the universe are the default. You do not have to prove that something breaking the laws of the universe doesn't exist because if you did we'd still be busy proving that telekinetic laser whales don't exist. You have to prove the existence (or possibility) of something that *doesn't* obey the laws of the universe. So if you want me to believe that ghosts and souls are possible, then you need to explain to me *how* they would be possible. \n\nFurthermore, you cannot compare ghosts to the electromagnetic spectrum. We can, and indeed have, successfully measured the entire electromagnetic spectrum. Furthermore, the electromagnetic spectrum makes sense and obeys physics. Ghosts do not make sense, nor do they obey physics. On top of that, no one has ever successfully measured the existence of them. **Even further**, the full electromagnetic spectrum is just the simple extension of the visible light section. It can be mathematically predicted and then immediately tested. It is repeatable. You get exactly the same result every time you run the test and every time you run the maths. All you have to do is change the wavelength. Ghosts would be an entirely new phenomenon. They cannot be predicted or tested and they sure as hell ain't repeatable or all those haunted houses would still be haunted when the skeptics came to visit. Do you not think it's curious that ghosts only ever appear to individuals? Most of whom are some kind of crazy? And all of whom can only ever see it while alone?", "787" ], [ "Entertainment in general really, not just athletics. Anything that requires creativity or where the entire job is based on the skill of humans. However:\n\nLeadership, ironically, can often be a very easy job to replace. Supercomputers are far better at analysing risks and costs and the like than humans can ever be. I reckon the intermediate stages (like, sub-leadership) will become automated pretty soon in the grand scale of things.\n\nDiagnostics will also be automated for a similar reason. Supercomputers can analyse databases basically instantly, whereas doctors only know what they know and can only diagnose based on things they remember. Computers can remember *everything*, and share any new information with every other computer instantly. Computers will actually be much better at diagnosis than humans. Human doctors will just become consultants instead. \n\nSalespersons really don't need to be human. Most people don't even use salespersons unless they genuinely have *no* idea what they're doing, in which case the answer is \"Well why the hell did you decide you want one of these without doing any research at all?\"", "917" ], [ "Yes, yes it is. That is undeniable. However, 1 person becoming a vegan and then stopping has no impact on meat production *whatsoever*. The reduction in profit from one person is so negligible that farmers would spend more figuring out how to adjust their programs in response than they would just continuing to produce the same amount. One person becoming vegan and never converting anyone else is comparable to 1 atom of Uranium decaying and those neutrons never hitting any other atoms - y'ain't getting an explosion unless you start a chain reaction.", "909" ], [ "No way. You can actually get a pretty accurate representation of which jobs will go first just by looking at the technology we already do have: We have many translation services already which are improving constantly. We even have software that translates speech as you're speaking it, and apps that translate words you hold in view of the camera. \n\nWe don't on the other hand have any programs that can design video games for us, or negotiate with the Israeli government, or discover cures for Alzheimers... you get the point. There's a big leap from \"Ai that can defuse bombs\" to \"Ai that can think creatively\", while only a small leap from \"Database that can translate words\" to \"Database that can translate more words\"", "917" ], [ "1. Anyone wishing to vote, drive, drink and do general adult things must take a maturity test every 4 years. Fail, and you aren't treated as an adult, for any purpose (except crimes), for the next 4 years. If you can't vote responsibly you can't vote at all!\n\n2. Some system of proportional representation will be applied to all democratic processes. Haven't figured out which yet.\n\n3. No democratic process can be opened to the public until a full draft detailing the specifics of the motion has been completed (no more brexit-style tomfoolery anymore!)\n\n4. I (the writer of this comment) gain the ability to review any political activity should I choose to do so and gain the final say on whether or not that activity is allowed to continue. Applies for as long as I (the writer of this comment) continues to be alive.", "845" ], [ "True, but even then a larger database will suffice. You can database a larger variety of words and sentence structures. You can also quite easily combine it with a program that figures out context. Yeah, google translate is pretty bad now, but it's still far closer to a completed product than something like an AI artist is. Just the progress that's been made on Translate in the last few years is evidence enough of that.", "917" ], [ "Things like that don't really need justifying the expenses for. If you can afford them, it's easier to keep on having them than to tell everyone your new number. Especially when you haven't been keeping track of who has which number. Cable is pointless, though. Newspapers are a convenient source of news and appropriate for people who don't understand computers (or how to avoid clickbait articles). They also keep high schoolers in pocket money which is OK.", "927" ], [ "No see, that's not what those mean. You are *just* an introvert. I do basically the same thing. I'm perfectly capable of conversing with people and indeed do so often. I can also see the value in interacting with others. Just because of these though, it doesn't make me an extrovert. I still find interacting gets tiring after a while. A sociable introvert is still just an introvert. An asocial extrovert is still just an extrovert.", "394" ], [ "And to keep it on the topic of intangibility, the conversation seems to have gone straight *through* yours.\n\nI feel I'll need to explain this too so here we go (although I don't expect you to understand it, far too complicated for you right?): See, ghosts can phase through things. One of their traditional properties is the inability to touch anything in the mortal plane of existence. Another way of saying someone isn't paying attention is with the expression \"in one ear, out the other\". This conjures an image of the words going straight through one's head. Since words would literally go straight through a ghost, it makes this a pun, see?", "147" ], [ "\"and so Earth was invaded by Aliens. Not those unconvincing CGI aliens. These were low quality aliens, much more reminiscent of 80s movies. They did on the other hand, still look perfectly realistic. As if to test that he indeed *wasn't* in an old alien invasion movie, <PERSON> got a sledgehammer and set to work on demolishing the aliens one by one. <PERSON> was the one controlling all the cameras in this scene, and was in charge of editing in general, so she knew that at no point would anyone ever suggest faking the footage of this in any way. No, this was a real sledgehammer and it was brutally colliding with the faces of real aliens, with a satisfying 'crunch' sound. At one point, <PERSON> wandered into the wrong place and also got sledgehammered, but this would later be considered simply minor collateral damage.\"\n\nSomething like that, where you specify that no camera or animation tricks can be used... would work. But it would be a cheat in itself I suppose.", "550" ], [ "Because it's pointless now. I reckon anyone paying attention would be able to predict a good 50% of the winners just on how much the producers will likely have paid in bribery. Furthermore, pretty much every Western film of the last year has been complete bollocks. There wasn't anything good enough for people to go \"Oh I liked that, I wonder if it'll get an award?\". Then on top of that you've probably got a bunch of boycotters from last year.", "321" ], [ "Depends. If what I'm drafting has diagrams n' shit, I'll draft it on paper because diagrams are a pain to make on a PC. If it's just writing, I'm not even gonna draft it I'm just gonna leap right in. There was a nice line on Bojack Horseman: \"I don't need to know the shortcut for undo. I don't make mistakes\" or something along those lines.", "676" ], [ "OK but even then, daily calorie intake is ~3000, and most people on that don't get fat. Then remember that <PERSON> is a badass warrior savin' the world n' shit, so is gonna be burning a fuck ton of calories, and she has to go even further over 3000 to start gaining weight, and then remember that she's an anime girl so is even *more* immune to being anything but thin... Unless she's literally drinking seeds she should be fine :P\n\nAnd if she is drinking seeds, I probably have way bigger problems than her weight... cos those seeds raise affection and like, 150 seeds per day, bearing in mind that 18 *in a lifetime* is enough to get to romantic love, and she's gonna be some crazy psycho...", "516" ], [ "Hah, the moment I saw the picture I was like \"That's clearly a meteor\" and then one of the theories turns out to be that it was actually a meteor! Yeah. Way too much confusing stuff. At least geology is a great subject for people who like to play with their food though! There's a surprising number of things that can be accurately represented with treacle or cake or something.", "950" ], [ "Honestly, if they get to star wars age and don't already know that thanks to the internet, they've done the internet wrong... Plus, it's just not that big of a twist anymore. Even before star wars, it was done occasionally, but thanks to star wars, like, 40% of books and films, especially childrens ones, have the villain turn out to be related to the protagonist in some way. As a younger person who only watched star wars once it was completely finished, all the Big Reveal did was make me laugh.", "946" ], [ "Not in my experience. I did some QA work for a game company last summer. it was pretty shit. First off, you might end up working for a company that makes terrible games, like Football Manager, that are phenomenally boring to play repeatedly. Second, you don't really get to play the game, you just test the same small bit a hundred times on 20 different PCs, vainly trying to reproduce a bug that another QA tester encountered once. You also have to be simultaneously very skilled at the game and capable of playing like an unskilled person but while still trying to be good (cos difficulty testing you can't just purposefully make mistakes when playing badly, you have to convincingly make accidental mistakes). \n\nImagine if you had to run Bleak Falls Barrow 100 times, using exactly the same convoluted armour combinations on Expert difficulty at level 1 and trying to use only shield bash to kill enemies. QA testing is ten times more tedious than that.", "575" ], [ "The receptors are simply recepting different things. If anything at all. Perceiving that yes, your liver is still there and hasn't changed at all isn't useful information, so the nervous system doesn't pay attention to it. Now, if a knife has been placed in that liver, *that's* information that the brain needs. Nerves only detect a *change* in something, so if things are staying exactly the same, nothing is going to pick it up.", "926" ], [ "OK well: Because humans don't run on being nice. \n\nAlso, the thing with insurance is that you can't predict where the money's going to go. Salaries are easy, they stay pretty much constant. But what if a massive earthquake hits a city? suddenly that insurance company is going to be paying out far more than it was predicting, and if it's not got any reserves cos it's invested it all, suddenly that company is broke.", "396" ], [ "Yeah, but even then nationalism doesn't work. The only way nationalism can create new jobs is by paying companies subsidies to employ locals instead of foreign or cheap labor (or robots). As such, you're going to get massive tax increases to compensate for this. Especially considering <PERSON> wants to spend so much on the wall. Companies will then have to charge more for their products, which means the value of currency decreases, so now the minimum wage has to be raised, and now companies can't afford to pay as many employees so jobs are lost. You *can't* make more jobs with nationalism if you're also interested in not losing your country.", "466" ], [ "Except, yknow, the EPA is important, and your field probably isn't. Hence why the world was going fine without the extra jobs.\n\nAlso, creating jobs is meaningless. You could declare that the government will subsidise potato farming and it is now illegal to not hire at least 200% more potato farmers than necessary. Congrats. You've made new jobs. You've fucked the economy, but you've made new jobs!", "941" ], [ "You really don't get it, do you? The EPA *is important*. You can't replace the EPA, you can't outsource it, and because it's not a business, profit doesn't matter. The oil industry *is* business. The reason the oil jobs were lost is because they're jobs that *aren't needed*. Robots do those jobs better, or maybe it's because the profit from selling the oil isn't worth the cost of extracting it, so the business shuts down? Either way, these jobs are gone *permanently*. Bringing them back is *meaningless*. It will be essentially paying half a million people to do *absolutely nothing*. This is not good for an economy! This is exactly the same as the whole national living wage. The *only* difference is that Nationalists lie about what's going on, and socialists don't.", "28" ], [ "The thing is though, if we stayed we'd continue to be exempt from most of the terms. Additionally, we'd have an input on what the terms actually were. Now, we have *no* control, but will still be subject to a bunch of laws we may not like - if we ever want to trade with Europe, which is something we need to do, we will now be at the mercy of the EU, and they are not going to give us a nice deal. This is why brexit was so irrational. It's like making a daring prison break and then crawling back to that same prison and asking if you can continue to sell toilet wine to the inmates. \n\nFurthermore, the \"laws you may not like\" *only* regulate trade. They exist to prevent any EU member gaining an unfair advantage and monopolising business. On top of that, you'll still have to deal with laws you may not like coming from the British government itself, making the whole affair just a pointless mess.", "631" ], [ "> Not really, the people can only vote to have their Representative ASK the EU council to do something. The counsel does not have to listen to them.\n\nThis is still better than having no say at all. Also, you're clearly not a politician. Politicians know that you never get something done simply by asking. Good politicians use blackmail!\n\n > Trade with us Yanks =D\n\nEw no thanks. But seriously, we already traded with the US as part of the EU. Losing the EU is still a tremendous blow that can't be replaced. The US market just isn't big enough to be able to compensate for the entirety of Europe. \n\n > EU's open border immigration policy, would you want to be part of that? It's done major damage to both Germany, and Sweden.\n\nYes, I would. It's very useful. And can you provide proof for your claims of damage to Germany and Sweden? Cos those are serious claims that I've never seen evidence to support. Open borders allow European globalisation to be far more efficient, and has brought a lot of good to the continent.", "437" ], [ "Except <PERSON> and <PERSON> are proof that democracy, much like socialism, is nice on paper and terrible in practice. It's because democracy lets people who have absolutely no idea what they're doing have a say in something as important as politics. There's a reason that all the world's most powerful countries became powerful when they weren't democracies. \n\nAnd yes, I do realise that the EU is attempting to become a single nation, much like the US. I think that's potentially a good thing. No EU country is powerful enough to compete against the likes of China, but combined, there's formidable wealth. The EU is simply the beginning of the inevitable. Eventually, countries won't exist, the world will just effectively be one nation and a few city-states. And there's nothing that can be done to stop this, except self-destruction. And if you ask me, being on the ruling council of the world is far preferable to not existing, or being absorbed into a larger region. \n\nName one EU law that doesn't regulate trade in some way. \n\nAnd you've clearly been deceived, somehow. Yes, all countries trading with the EU obey the same laws (except y'know, all the internal EU laws), but there's one key difference: People outside the EU pay tariffs. People inside the EU do not. We'd still have a bunch of rules to obey, but we'd also have to pay the EU to sell anything to them, making business for the UK far more difficult. There's a reason that more than 90% of UK business owners (and even mid tier workers in those businesses) think Brexit is a terrible idea.", "437" ], [ "And if they do that, then they're perfectly upstanding citizens and deserving of EU citizenship. You clearly don't recognise just how difficult it is to get citizenship. Germany requires you to have lived in the country for 8 years (legally), be fluent in German, both spoken and written, have a clean criminal record, and surrender of any other nationalities. Sweden requires 4 years of legal residence. You can't just cross the border, pop down to the local government and say \"i'd like citizenship please\". And if they've been in a country so long they pass the citizenship requirements, they're going to have established a life there anyway and be less likely to leave. This is not a problem at all, you simply want it to be so you can blame whatever insecurities you have on migrants.", "914" ], [ "Wat'chu talkin' bout? Japanese is easy! Hardest part are the kanji, but they're of secondary importance anyway. Learning to speak and understand grammar is the first objective, since google translate can tell you what kanji mean, but generally sucks at telling you what an entire sentence means. If you haven't already, at least memorise the Katakana and Hiragana. Get those down and reading becomes a *lot* easier. You can figure out the general gist of a sentence just from the hiragana and the context (since hiragana are used for word endings and even many complete words now).", "902" ], [ "Nah, you don't take over the world by invasion, people will stop you then. You take it over with trade. Make the entire world so dependent on your market that they do everything they can to stop you having problems. China, if unchecked, will become this very soon. The EU is also a good candidate (or was before nationalism. Hopefully it'll recover). The success of the shared market means that eventually they could add a large proportion of the first world to it, and impose a wide array of laws.", "848" ], [ "Fair enough... although they seem to be a pretty asocial bunch. If there's a sign but you can't read it so have to ask someone, they'll probably be a bit miffed. Also, if you plan on visiting, make sure to familiarise yourself with the way they pronounce English words, cos they'll be saying them a lot, and their pronunciations are much harder to get used to than most other countries!", "930" ], [ "Well, from things like google street view, and the bits of anime where they set them in actual towns, English on signs seems pretty rare... and if it is, it's usually stuff like store names. It's quite common written in Katakana though. And also, their \"most basic English\" is very different from most other countries. They tend to get grammar wrong and it can be quite confusing.", "605" ], [ "One day I'm going to become a world-class tv producer, and write a world-class tv show that people will talk about for generations, and that will run for many amazing seasons that never decline in quality. And then when it finally ends, it'll end on a cliffhanger, leaving everyone desiring more. I'll come back on my death bed and make the final special episode that wraps it all up, and the very last scene will be the protagonist waking up from a coma.\n\nIt would be the greatest troll *ever done*.", "420" ], [ "Language is already art in my opinion - it's far more artistic than most modern art after all! Something can be art and language at the same time. In fact, most art exists to communicate something in the first place! They're not mutually exclusive things.\n\nBut anyway... I don't know how many caves you've been in, but they generally have stone floors. Sand and dirt are very rare inside caves. Also, any loose sediment *outside* the cave will be far too easily dislodged by wind and other movement. Furthermore, the contrast between \"dirt\" and \"slightly depressed dirt\" is very small. You need people to see your message, which probably wouldn't happen if it was just a trace in the soil. \n\nAlso, I suspect you haven't seen cave paintings either. Cave paintings aren't carved. They're just pigments painted directly onto the rock. This is a very easy thing to do. The benefit of your message lasting and having a much higher chance of being read far outweighs the cost of having to spend half an hour finding and producing the paint. \n\nAlso, as with all language, the pictures probably contained far more information than \"I saw an animal\". It also contains details on what the animal was doing, where it was and when it might get there. For hunter gatherer societies, keeping track of migratory animals is incredibly important. \n\nAnd they *definitely* had other things to do. The life of a caveman was very busy. Hunting enough food for the entire group takes a long time, even when working in teams, if you're only using primitive weapons. That puts the men out of action for a good half of each day. Same applies to berry gathering. Not a lot of fruit on the plains of Africa. Then you also have child rearing, tool making, firewood collecting... all tasks that take a considerable amount of work. Stack on top of this the fact that Homo erectus was nomadic so couldn't have used art... \n\n\nOf course, another, quite compelling theory is that it is neither intended as decoration or communication but as a ritual, which makes the most sense: Art is of no use to cavemen and communication can be more easily done using speech. This theory goes that the group's shaman would head into the dark cave, do some stuff and paint pictures of animals on the walls. This was then supposed to increase the abundance of wildlife.", "426" ], [ "Ah OK according to the internet, the full thing now has 12 bloody letters: LGBTQQIP2SAA\n\nL,G,B and T are obviously obvious. The first Q stands for Queer which apparently means \"basically anything that's not a straight cis-male/female\". The second Q is \"Questioning\" so people who don't know yet I guess. I is for hermaphrodites, except I guess Intersex is the politically correct term now. P is for Pansexual which apparently means exactly the same thing as Bisexual so theres another redundancy. 2S stands for \"2 spirits\" which I have no clue about and the article isn't saying anything beyond \"some people call themselves this\". The first A is for asexual, so people who don't feel lust. And the second A is for \"<PERSON>\" which refers to anyone who isn't one of the above but still thinks LGBTetc deserve rights. So basically the acronym LGBTQQIP2SAA Now just means \"literally everyone who isn't a straight cis-male/female homophobic asshole\".", "640" ], [ "Because when bows were invented, civilisation didn't exist. This means there were only a few people at a time trying to figure out how to invent the arrow. You had a lot of small incidences of attempts, which isn't very efficient.\n\nWhen Playstation was invented, civilisation had progressed so much it was worldwide. A worldwide civilisation allows you to share information. You have millions of people now working on exactly the same project, instead of a few thousand groups of 5 trying to invent it from scratch. \n\nSo if we were trying to invent the bow and arrow now, if one person figured out how to make string, they could tell everyone else how to do it. Now the entire invention process is one step along for the entire world. Then if someone finds some springy wood, they can tell everyone and move the entire process along again. Then if someone figures out to connect the string and the spring, they've invented the bow. This is far faster than having each individual person trying to invent it individually. If the playstation had been invented in the same way as the bow... well it wouldn't be invented for another 2 million years.", "917" ], [ "No dude this is not a matter of belief and theories this is a matter of fact. We have fossil evidence of humans using tools 2 million years ago. We have fossil evidence of humans using bows and arrows 64000 years ago. You cannot have an opinion on something that is fact - if you do, and your opinion is not \"the facts are literally right there\", you're just wrong.\n\nAnd to answer your question? *Scientists know*. Believe it or not, scientists are really fucking curious about human evolution. We've discovered a lot of very interesting stuff.", "931" ], [ "Um, actually *dude*, it kinda does. Fossils are perfect proof. Are you telling me fossils aren't good enough for you to believe dinosaurs existed? Cos we haven't got any other proof for dinosaurs and yet surprisingly enough literally every scientist knows dinosaurs exist. Even the children are beating you on this one if you say \"yes\". Fossils are in fact some of the best evidence we have for anything, because anyone can look at a fossil and go \"well shit, that's awesome\". They don't even need to repeat the experiment. You can literally see a fossil with your own eyes. It is impossible to doubt the truth of something if there is conclusive fossil evidence proving it true. \n\nAnd mate, \"millions of years ago\" is a *really* ***Really*** short length of time. Life on earth has existed for at least 3.8 BILLION years. 0.002 billion is *insignificant* in comparison. It is just 0.05% of the time that life has existed.", "366" ], [ "Except that clearly scientists are too useful to execute. On top of that, you would end up executing people who had no choice in the matter - it was either cooperate with the regime or die. Considering this is something that humans have decided upon and that is solely based on morality, it is by definition gray. The dictionary definition says things like genociding a large portion of society. Except how much \"large\" is is completely open to interpretation.", "55" ], [ "Only in your eyes. And you, my friend, are not the one deciding what defines a crime. \n\nThe people who defined \"crime against humanity\" were old farts in suits in a board room of some description. Then came a world war and some scientists who worked to surprisingly cruel means. When this war was over, the losers were put on trial for their actions. The winners were not. Thus we've already established a boundary here: If you win a war, you're exempt from being punished for any crimes you committed doing it. Most of the scientists on trial were spared from execution on the grounds that they would work for the Allies. And here we have another boundary: Old farts have decided that if you are useful enough, you do not need to be held accountable for any crimes you commit. Even if that crime was contributing to genocide. \n\nFurthermore, genocide is completely and utterly grey. Let me just give you one example. Remember World War 2? Remember how millions of people died? Millions of people definitely counts as genocide in my books. Except because of the grey nature of genocide, the people who committed it are considered heroes, not criminals.", "55" ], [ "Oh shit I completely forgot the premise of the post. My apologies!\n\nYes, there is a grey nature to genocide, as I literally just gave an example of when there was a grey area. Genocide, just like all crimes, only gets sentenced when the country doing to prosecution has nothing to gain from it. So the genocides committed by US soldiers in WW2 go unprosecuted because the ones doing the prosecution are the ones who committed the crime in the first place. The Nazi scientists go unprosecuted because the Allies (the ones doing the prosecuting) gain more from keeping them than they do from killing them.", "55" ], [ "Evidence? Logically speaking that makes no sense. You would not live in Siberia before you tried to inhabit China. China would get inhabited first because China is not \"stupid fucking hostile\" levels of stupid fucking hostile. \n\nAlso, Humans lived in Africa before they lived in Europe, and yet we evolved paler skin because it better suits the less sunny climate. Even if Chinese people did move down from Siberia, you would still expect them to lose the fold.", "842" ], [ "That does depend on them moving down from the North in the first place though, which doesn't make sense to me. Logically speaking, humans would have moved East from the Middle East, following the warm climate. You wouldn't move North until you really had to cos other tribes had taken over everything else, and the slow pace of everything in Siberia would mean those moving into China from the South-west will be moving into it much faster.\n\nAlso the sciency word for humanologist is anthropologist.", "842" ], [ "I disagree with that, but I think Konami has done a good job of hiding the OPness, and simultaneously mitigating the OPness of old cards. <PERSON> for example I would no longer consider OP because so much can resist or outright negate it. Still a Limited card forever though :). They do still make really OP cards but they disguise those cards as archetypes. <PERSON> for example, I would consider far more OP than any of the old cards. I think if you can find a card or cards in like, 75% of competitive decks at any given time, that's a pretty good indication that it's OP - the OPness of Raigeki comes from it's splashability and ease of use after all, which are both things that can easily describe many meta engines.", "535" ], [ "However people should also not be forced into being able to use only a small amount of stores simply because the town's store owners are closed-minded rednecks. But surely there's a simple solution to this: make a law that says it's illegal to treat people differently based on things about them that are beyond their control, right? Oh wait [this is already a law](_URL_0_). So there we have it! While religious store owners may be forced to violate their feudal religious beliefs, they must do so in order to coincide with the law, so it's all fine!", "165" ], [ "There's a difference between being an asshole and breaking the law though. It is actually a criminal offense to refuse someone service based on any factor that is out of their control. Also, being an asshole to LGBT people would at absolute worst be shouting insults. If you do anything that actually interferes with someone's ability to conduct daily life, you're no longer being an asshole, you're being a sub-human entity.", "2" ], [ "No. Feel free to have a non-mainstream religion. That's fine. And that's why I asked if you converted. If you'd said \"no I was indoctrinated into it\" I would not mock you because you weren't given a choice. Since you did convert though - you made a conscious decision to start worshipping different gods - you get mocked. \n\nAnd this is true of all religions. If you convert religion I will mock you for it. The only excuse for following a religion is indoctrination, and even then that's a pretty shitty excuse. Actively deciding to want a different set of gods to be real is pathetic.", "165" ], [ "It's a bit silly but it's fine. Give that food to starving Children and they'd probably eat for a week tops. Y'ain't gonna achieve anything if you're acting on such a small scale. If you feel really guilty about it you'd achieve far more by putting the money spent on that food into something like Wateraid instead. Cos clean water that isn't going to make them turn inside out is far more important in the long run.", "997" ], [ "Somehow I got the impression you were recounting this as if you had actually been there... which is weird. Yeah I mentioned in another comment that there was a possibility that Siberia wasn't as Stupid Fucking Hostile back then. Also, anthropology is one of the fields that's changing pretty rapidly and that has a large variety of theories in it. I would be very surprised if you have been taught everything (for example, where you aware that humans (I can't remember which species but I'm pretty sure it was sapiens) actually moved *back* into Africa after moving out it?", "842" ], [ "Dots, when they first appeared, actually still signified a pause. A dot in the middle of the line (about the level of this hyphen - ) indicated a short pause, such as that of a comma. A dot at the bottom of the line indicated a longer pause, such as that at the end of a sentence. The ellipse is commonly confused with being three dots but it is actually a different symbol all together. It is believed to have been created by playwrights to indicate the kind of hesitation found in natural speech (such as when you've briefly forgotten the word you're looking for). It actually used to be a much *longer* pause than that of a period/full stop. Over time it evolved into the form used today - it still serves a similar purpose... it actually indicates a longer pause than that of a full stop. You're simply reading it differently. I, and everyone I know, read it as an extended pause.", "251" ], [ "If you're gonna make claims like this you're gonna have to provide a link to the studies.\n\nAlso, I'm pretty sure this is going to be a test on reaction times, so let me give you a metaphor (now please be aware all of you who are about to call me racist - I do not mean any of this seriously, I do not think asians or black people are any less intelligent than white people, it is simply to point out that reaction speed is irrelevant).\n\nYou have to get from A to B. You are presented with 3 options. The Red car, the Blue car and the Yellow car. The red car has a top speed of 120mph, and has no obvious flaws. The yellow car travels at 140mph but you can see that the gearstick has been replaced by a stick from a tree, sellotaped in place, and you know from the make that it has to stop for fuel every 30 miles. The blue car travels at 180mph but you can clearly see that the wheels are about to fall off. Which car do you take? Just because something is faster it does not mean it's going to be better at a test of power and efficiency.", "54" ], [ "I dunno, don't ask is the thing. Just act. So, most of my hobbies are stereotypically masculine - video games, tabletop games (like D & D), and I have a relatively masculine dialect too. I've found that the best way to not get treated differently is if everyone just views you as \"one of the guys\". Being able to hold your own in a competitive game is very valuable here! Although I suspect being gay helps quite a lot here. Turns out men quite enjoy talking about which women they find most attractive so being able to join in that conversation is like a golden ticket.", "289" ], [ "If you want to be competitive... not really. Extra deck cards are *very* expensive. Crystal Wing is something like $70 and it's basically a necessity in any synchro capable deck. I'd say your cheapest still competitive option is probably going to be Monarchs, although I don't know how long they'll remain viable. There's about 2 days until Zoodiac after all. If you'll only be playing casually, there are loads of options, it's really just up to what your tastes are.", "471" ], [ "WHY IS SHADDOLL FUSION $7 THATS WAY TOO MUCH. WHY AREN'T THEY PRINTING A SHINY LUMINA WITH THE LARGER PICTURE BOX? MY DECK LOOKS WEIRD. WHY HAVE THEY NEVER MADE SUPER RARE HIERATICS. THEY'RE MADE OF BLOODY STARS THEY'RE THE PERFECT SUPER RARE CANDIDATES. WHY DID THEY CANCEL GHOST RARES THEY LOOK AMAZING.\n\nAND WHY AREN'T YOU ALLOWED TO USE OCG CARDS IN TCG? LIKE, I GET IF THEY'RE MAIN DECK COS DIFFERENT CARDSTOCK BUT EXTRA DECK DOESN'T NEED TO BE UNIFORM AND IF THE CARD'S ALREADY BEEN RELEASED IN TCG MODE IT MAKES NO SENSE. EVEN A JUDGE COULDN'T EXPLAIN IT TO ME, HE WAS ONLY ABLE TO SAY \"WELL THATS THE RULE, WE'VE GOT TO FOLLOW THE RULES\". ITS JUST A MASSIVE BLOODY CASH GRAB.", "471" ], [ "But all of these cards rely on other cards to work. They're hardly OP if not combined with power creep. At the time of creation, Last Will had very little to search for, Magical Scientist was only really getting 2500 and below attackers with relatively weak effects and I think you read Painful Choice wrong. Your opponent chooses only 1 card, which goes to your hand. The rest go to the grave. Your opponent is then free to choose something completely useless and bricky, and at time of release nothing really existed that could make use of a mill 4. The only cards that were truly OP at time of release back then were Raigeki, Harpie's and Monster Reborn. Which are all much weaker now. Oh and Sixth Sense, which has been made even stronger but still only because of external powercreep. However, thinks like Zoodiacs are different because they were released when powercreep had already happened, so konami knew exactly what to expect from them. I think they are also going to be difficult to power creep because the game is already about as fast as it can realistically be.", "535" ], [ "Can use it on fusions too :) You can normal a shaddol whose flip you don't need, then nephe it which allows you to fusion summon any monster you want. You don't need a fusion card either cos Nephe can fusion summon. Then you get the send to graveyard effect of the normal'd shaddoll. It's actually quite good if you don't use your normal otherwise.", "453" ], [ "I don't think cards that aren't splashable are actually OP (unless they are genuinely broken, like \"If the only monsters in your deck are X-archetype monsters, you basically win the game\"). So Raigeki, Reborn etc would be significantly less OP if they could only be used in certain kinds of deck. \n\nAs for Zoodiacs... it is actually possible to get more than 1200 ATK lol, it's just the way the current meta demand it be played focuses on using them for other purposes. If you look at some of the extra deck cards, it looks like they were intended to build up big beaters with a bunch of effects. \n\nAnd of course, no deck can work with a single card in it, but you know what I mean. Raigeki can always be used in any deck, as can Monster Reborn, independent of the strength of each card. Raigeki is almost as good today in combo-heavy meta decks as it was long before archetypes were invented. However, Magical Scientist only became good once decent level 6 and lower fusions came out (and especially once synchro and xyz came out which could make a one-turn fusion that can't attack directly become useful.", "344" ], [ "Not that I know of, I think it's just there to make organising the database more convenient. Many prizes come from which ranking bracket you landed in (usually a multiple of 8), and this makes it easy to group the top decks. It also allows some leeway in terms of draws and player strategy - if a deck says it came top 8, rather than 2nd or 3rd, then people using it will expect to get 8 or higher, rather than expect to get 2nd.", "286" ], [ "I never had a problem with Standard tbh... Standard is pretty cheap and thanks to the way the game works you can pretty easily make budget versions of decks and still have them work competitively. Then again, I didn't play Tarkir or Innistrad, and I only started in Ravnica, so if they were those 2 or from before <PERSON> then I don't know anything about it. New Ravnica that is, just before <PERSON>.", "344" ], [ "Except fire can also be blue, purple, white, pink, yellow, green... I mean, did you not see all the Infernoid cards? So much blue fire on those. They could quite easily have used a different colour fire. And, brilliantly, thanks to the same Lore explanation, it should have blue flames - if you burn a diamond, you will create blue flames.", "274" ], [ "That's not what mathematically not possible means. If revealing 5 tuners was mathematically impossible, Star Dragon would have to say \"reveal the top 4 cards\". It is entirely possible to reveal 5 tuners. Assuming you have 5 tuners left in your deck, and 30 cards left total, and you shuffled just before using Shooting Star, that's a 5/30 x 4/29 x 3/28 x 2/27 x 1/26 chance of revealing all 5 tuners: So with these conditions, the chance of revealing 5 tuners is 3.8%. 3.8% is definitely not \"mathematically impossible\". In fact, it's only 1.2% away from \"So mathematically possible that your experiment was shit and you'll have to do it again\". Of course, this chance goes up with more tuners and/or fewer remaining cards.", "805" ], [ "There are many cities with the first world status to contain a rich cunt looking for god cards. London, Paris, Berlin, whichever is Spain's best city (Probably Barcelona, they do a lot of game stuff there), Singapore... actually Singapore is the most likely since it has lots of strange buildings and architecture, perfect scenery for normal monster beatdown mirror matches!", "146" ], [ "Lightsworn (but I wouldn't Max rarity the entire thing). I only want Ultra Luminas with the modern image size. Also Super Fairy Tail - Snow would be nice. Since I already have the rest of the deck in high rarity, I'll have at least $1000 spare that I didn't use on Minerva, with which I will also Max Rarify Aromage and Hieratics! Cos Hieratics in Super would be amazing. And then I'd still have a bunch left over so I guess I'd just use it to buyout the stupidest, most pointless card to really confuse people.", "471" ], [ "OK just do the maths and you'll know. He needed 4 more duels. Now, we can't seem to determine whether this was to boost his win ratio from 50% to 60% or to boost his total duels from 46 to 50. Now, if as you say, he already had the 50 duels necessary, then if he has exactly 50/50 win ratio, the minimum number of duels he must have won is 25. Now, if he were to win 4 more duels, it would only bring him to a 53.7% win rate, since he would now have 29 wins and 54 total duels. By dividing 29 by 54, we get 0.537: 53.7%. Now, it is possible he has *more* than 50 duels. Lets go with 60. However, to have a perfect 50/50 win record, this would mean he had 30 wins and 30 losses. Add 4 more wins to this makes 34 wins and 30 losses, with 64 duels total. 34 divided by 64 is 0.531: only 53.1%. Now lets say he has 80 duels, meaning 40 wins. Plus 4 wins means 44/84. 44 divided by 84 is 0.524: just 52.4%. So as you see, the more total duels you have, the more wins you need to bring a 50% winrate up to a 60% win rate.\n\nThus, since he only needed 4 more wins, it is only possible that he already had the 60% win rate and needed 4 more wins to get the 50 duels.", "805" ], [ "Huh, my apologies. I was certain that Grysta was the possessed form of Gem-Knight Master Diamond, not Cairngorgon. However, there is still a problem. Cairngorm is a form of quartz; specifically, a form that has free silicon molecules. These molecules make the crystal even more fragile than it already is - when exposed to even a small amount of heat, quartz fractures and splinters into many pieces. Furthermore, should one get it hot enough to burn, they will see - you guessed it - purple. \n\nAnd, actually, there are quite a few differences in the shaddolls. You have Construct and its forms (Shekhinaga and Anonyatillis), Winda, Wendigo and then Grysta. Trying to emphasise that Grysta is different from a bunch of different things is really not very impressive, especially considering that they completely butchered its artwork just to make a point. Grysta is to shaddolls what post-modernism is to art - Sure you may have a point to make but it doesn't really matter when your picture is painful to look at or your song frustrating to hear.", "416" ], [ "No, they shouldn't. It would cost them far too much money to do and wouldn't be worth it because few people would bother going to see it again. People who desperately want a little extra quality are capable of watching the subbed version, after all. Now don't get me wrong, I can't stand pointless censorship, second only to how much I despise (and I mean *despise* localisation) but \"things that should have been done from the start\" is very different from \"things that should be done now\"", "526" ], [ "Haha true, science doesn't really fit the evil burning computer demon thing, but since you decided to bring up what colour fire is I felt the need to point out that fire isn't always fire coloured :P \n\nThere are pretty big holes in the Duel Terminal lore anyway though, so there's quite a lot open for interpretation. I bet they'd make a good deal of money releasing one big book that explains all of the Duel Terminal world. I know I'd read it.", "274" ], [ "I will propose a counterargument to Clown's: YGOpro is terrible for new players. It has absolutely no tutorial features, it just drops you in the middle of a bunch of players who know what they're doing and says \"here's over 8000 possible cards, have fun.\"\n\nFor new players, I would highly recommend Legacy of the Duelist. It is organised into 4 different campaigns, one following each of the TV series' plots, and involving cards and decks from that era. This means new players can select which kind of decks they want to fight and gives lots of time and recommended deck recipes to ease new players in. Once you get your confidence up with that, you'll probably then know enough about how to build a deck and how to play the game to try fighting other people on Ygopro.", "344" ], [ "Yes, that is what I'm saying. Most of <PERSON>'s attempts at drama are just a bit embarrassing on behalf of Konami, whereas Abridged actually accomplishes what it aims to do - it is funny. Thus, I would prefer to watch an Abridged movie than a 'proper' one. \n\nI mean, it's Abridged that kept me playing the game for so long. if it didn't exist I'd have dropped it years ago, and I only watched DM in the first place to see how badly 4kids really did it.", "192" ], [ "Well why not, it's great!\n\nBut seriously: no there's nothing hard to understand about thinking the original is better than the dub, especially if it has more content. The bit that makes you seem like a weeb is that you want them to release a more accurate dubbed version, giving several impressions on your true nature: first, that you'd rather watch dubs but simultaneously prefer subs, making you seem like a hypocrite, and second that you don't understand simple economics and feel there's no reason everything shouldn't go your way. These two impressions are what make you seem like a weeb.", "869" ], [ "It doesn't matter whether or not you do, what matters is whether or not *other* people *think* you do. You give off the *impression* that you don't know what you're talking about, and considering that no human is capable of reading minds through a computer screen, the *impression* your words give off is what people use to determine your personality and qualities.\n\nOh and also, that's not how economics works. There's a lot of demand for faster than lightspeed space travel. Ain't any more likely or less likely to happen because of it. You would need millions of people to demand (and I mean *demand*) a redub before anyone would even consider it. Then you need to persuade 4kids to give up the license to it, and then you need to convince Konami to give that license to someone else, and also you'd probably need to found a new studio capable of doing it properly cos even Funimation probably can't meet your standards.", "505" ] ]
348
[ 22117, 7709, 11614, 827, 12766, 1248, 2347, 25442, 13100, 1188, 13530, 3238, 15422, 8528, 4165, 1095, 4314, 8853, 14843, 2843, 1623, 2738, 25253, 22714, 1803, 19293, 11660, 11203, 12769, 10506, 6458, 5542, 24224, 7173, 21988, 5443, 16115, 19707, 16479, 16615, 16635, 6873, 10034, 14391, 676, 24063, 11367, 4731, 20270, 6403, 8630, 12772, 25148, 13452, 854, 12987, 9450, 22082, 12660, 23588, 16313, 18640, 1477, 9614, 14111, 1993, 1193, 10881, 16167, 12212, 25541, 9370, 7478, 21951, 3057, 16499, 3162, 7916, 9222, 5610, 4161, 3019, 9890, 8755, 7003, 12477, 8516, 8609, 11589, 2707, 21090, 9344, 82, 17970, 2624, 23116, 6969, 5090, 4564, 14610, 3022, 23029, 4216, 11128, 1526, 25460, 6590, 20467, 23614, 5205, 11468, 7999, 16387, 8870, 15404, 9551, 5607, 11037, 22034, 15935, 5017, 3757, 8544, 12096, 23638, 12981, 11700, 22741, 6921, 1317, 13070, 2687, 12146, 3186, 2800, 292, 3352, 7433, 24247, 21538, 16666, 10452, 23665, 686, 16149, 4221, 20324, 16249, 18323, 8248, 14535, 14279, 14726, 4274, 19209, 2832, 442, 4681, 3133, 4821, 1694, 19380, 13729, 23977, 4106, 8265, 9443, 11422, 14968, 6361, 16463, 4603, 10465, 376, 21706, 7163, 1727, 3593, 3712, 20364, 8532, 9228, 6405, 21175, 13445, 18951, 3142, 16370, 22237, 4887, 15853, 10470, 4464, 16611, 5049, 11337, 1011, 9361, 2217, 9685, 10842, 2909, 184, 24503, 2603, 5265, 12493, 7930, 17403, 8095, 3120, 1456, 12298, 25196, 9939, 7645, 5495, 17599, 9256, 736, 13180, 9606, 6990, 19631, 8269, 20026, 678, 23091, 19834, 1057, 18158, 20286, 3761, 1145, 14133, 4825, 15498, 23291, 4831, 5567, 6473, 12561, 18069, 13019, 16845, 13772, 10805, 9405, 8783, 12277, 4479, 18035, 15223, 23344, 6936, 13024, 1279, 9791, 2690, 14519, 11803, 11388, 4691, 10467, 18716, 4783, 1740, 21184, 24792, 10362, 11452, 3286, 2373, 3864, 20844, 4494, 7013, 8926, 8162, 11789, 19312, 16786, 13401, 9461, 3616, 21972, 17891, 7578, 14503, 7396, 16793, 2403, 15143, 14484, 8969, 1043, 18596, 17896, 12902, 855, 3467, 11030, 6425, 10836, 11932, 8856, 9689, 17746, 11831, 16711, 4624, 14004, 11796, 6987, 4929, 5972, 15019, 7677, 9982, 15985, 1254, 5025, 5235, 22828, 3717, 7086, 8208, 3330, 9910, 10150, 11609, 23071, 14116, 2490, 3367, 12040, 8398, 706, 17058, 4608, 4894, 19699, 3056, 3029, 12017, 18176, 13434, 13264, 1948, 5553, 869, 7411, 367, 9740, 23896, 14793, 1924, 11900, 16730, 7953, 10611, 3121, 10308, 5325, 21433, 11169, 24228, 25021, 6106, 11386, 4850, 15667, 10044, 8056, 16978, 6137, 10222, 6887, 2933, 18301, 8645, 5333, 2953, 21639, 2401, 21803, 10964, 9241, 12985, 3698, 2743, 17077, 24139, 14481, 3156, 2918, 1636, 18346, 23129, 19083, 9238, 6692, 16803, 12860, 3622, 3567, 8836, 9774, 2417, 23312, 7290, 15882, 17826, 14441, 4976, 14713, 13611, 25079, 741, 8878, 7187, 4708, 374, 7181, 2233, 9304, 10094, 19106, 14520, 12080, 8773, 3435, 4378, 4491, 11622, 16049, 5802, 7218, 5138, 22296, 404, 22282, 546, 2339, 414, 10536, 10436, 20942, 10683, 11594, 9684, 15500, 6078, 10107, 334, 12774, 65, 8099, 19210, 13640, 20076, 16015, 4302, 4088, 14432, 7070, 3786, 11569, 21617, 17741, 18884, 14084, 16114, 13583, 21343, 10194, 3332, 23278, 10381, 10775, 12754, 15204, 18189, 4052, 479, 14329, 12761, 11693, 24368, 4619, 24301, 17974, 14348, 16429, 16077, 1367, 17070, 18725, 14181 ]
reddit_dump_-Kerosun-
[ [ "Oh, I see... right wing STATE terrorism?\n\nLike the Baltimore riots? With the majority black police force, the majority black city council, black governor, black mayor, black Attorney General, black President, all \"left wing\" from top to bottom. Can say the same for most of Ferguson, most of Wisconsin, most of Dallas and just about any other urban locale such riots have taken place in. THAT right-wing STATE terrorism?\n\nAnd EVEN IF TRUE, why does that justify \"left wing\" terrorism against left-wing communities with left-wing business owners where left-wing people work? OR terrorism against people completely uninvolved with the supposed right-wing state terrorism?\n\nCome on... you can't seriously believe that even if true, it justifies terrorism against your own people or a 3rd party unrelated to the supposed right-wing STATE terrorism.\n\nWe're done here.", "690" ], [ "Both sides have their specific rejections of science.\n\nThe side that is for abortion will deny that the unborn fetus is alive or is say it is not human. Science tells us that the unborn fetus is 100% alive, 100% human and a unique/individual organism.\n\nThe left tries to suggest that gender and biological sex are not linked and that gender is just a societal construct. Science tells us that this isn't the case. Science tells us that gender is linked to biological sex in some way and it is not purely societal constructs that create gender biases or gender norms. To deny that gender is linked to biological sex in some way is to deny science.\n\nBeing anti-vax is also not directly correlated with being on the right or the left. There are plenty of liberals that ascribe to anti-vax conspiracies. This also falls into homeopathic treatments that don't just have no scientific backing to them, but even homeopathic treatments that are directly juxtaposed to medical science (essential oils, healing crystals, etc.).\n\nThere are plenty of additional examples where the left dissents from science, but these two examples are on the forefront of left-leaning ideology, so I feel this is sufficient to prove my point.\n\nThe right certainly has their issues. My overall point, is that both sides do reject the science if it opposes their political ideology.", "674" ], [ "Fun fact: For most people, weight training actually burns more fat that cardio because of the calories your body burns to repair the damaged muscle tissue. You have to do very long, high-intensity cardio to burn off more calories than from weight training. Weight training also increases muscle mass which means there is more muscle to use, meaning your body requires more calories to do the same tasks as before (weight from fat doesn't use calories, weight from muscle does and we know muscle weighs more than fat).", "35" ], [ "The reason a \"sunset clause\" (official term) was written into the bill for those taxes was because not enough democrats voted for it. In order to make those changes permanent, it would have required a super majority of Congress to approve the bill.\n\nSo, you either disagree with the tax changes in the first place and are happy that the sunset clause is in the bill OR you wish more Democrats voted in favor of it so the sunset clause wasn't necessary.\n\nWhich is it? Also, the next administration can extend or make them permanent if enough senators would vote in favor of them. Do you want them permanent or not?", "284" ], [ "They would be right, though.\n\nWhy? Because the only reason the tax cuts couldn't be made permanent was because in order to make them permanent, it requires a super-majority vote of approval. Since no Democrat Senator voted in favor of the tax cut, it couldn't be made permanent.\n\nSo, if <PERSON> doesn't advocate to extend those tax cuts, he would be allowing them to expire.\n\nAlso, if the Republican controlled Senate passed a bill to extend the tax cuts and no Democrat Senators vote in favor, then it is not a veto-proof bill and <PERSON> would have the power to veto the extension or approve it.", "284" ], [ "No. It wasn't made permanent because they didn't have enough votes to make them permanent. It required a super-majority vote of approval to make them permanent. No Democrat voted in favor of the bill, so the sunset clause had to be written into it.\n\nSo, you either disagree with the tax cuts in the first place and are glad they weren't made permanent, OR you like the tax cuts and wish they were permanent and should call up your Democrat senators to support a bill that extends or makes them permanent (if you have any).", "284" ], [ "Using YOUR logic, you could also say that it's all about physical activity.\n\nThat should show you why your logic is flawed. Both matter. If you don't change your diet but change your physical activity, you will see changes in your body.\n\nWhat you're saying is that only the first number in an addition problem matters. Is that true? Of course not.\n\nI see what you're trying to do, but the logic doesn't work no matter how much you think it does. Both matter and that is irrefutable. To continue to refute it is to argue against an objective fact, but here you are doing just that.\n\nAnd for that, I'm out.", "261" ], [ "> This view is not mainstream, nor the point of the pro-choice movement.\n\nIt comes up in just about every debate or argument between the two sides. Such phrases as \"it's not human\", \"it's not alive\", \"it's just a clump of cells\", etc. And even if it is not the point of the pro-choice movement, many people that would side with the pro-choice movement will argue any of the phrases I mentioned as a counterargument when people that are pro-life argue that abortion is killing a life.\n\n > Cite your source, as I don't believe this is correct.\n\nWait... you *really* need a source on this? You really need me to provide sources that show that gender is not purely a social construct and that gender is in part influenced by biological sex? Well, here is just one source among literally hundreds of thousands on the topic.\n\n_URL_0_\n\nAbstract:\n\n > Basic genetic and physiological differences, in combination with environmental factors, result in behavioral and cognitive differences between males and females. Sex differences in the brain, sex-typed behavior and gender identity, and sex differences in cognitive ability should be studied at all points in the life span. Hormones play a role in behavioral and cognitive sex differences but are not solely responsible for those differences. In addition, sex differences in perception of pain have important clinical implications. Research is needed on the natural variations between and within the sexes in behavior, cognition, and perception, with expanded investigation of sex differences in brain structure and function.\n\nA few paragraphs in the article:\n\n > No single factor produces sex differences in any one behavioral or cognitive trait, let alone in all of them. Until recently, it has been popular to focus on cultural or experiential causes of these differences. Thus, for example, sex differences in the occurrence of depression have been considered to reflect women's greater social orientation (which is itself assumed to be cultural) or stresses associated with women's multiple social roles (as also mentioned in Chapter 3). In the past 10 years, however, there has been increasing appreciation of the fact that genetic and physiological differences between males and females might also influence behavioral sex differences. Although some might argue that the pendulum has swung too much in favor of genes and physiology (Fausto-Sterling, 2000), there is considerable interest in examining the joint effects of genes, physiology, and experiences.\n\n\n\n_______\n\n > You are correct here, these nutters are everywhere. Thankfully not many politicians share these views.\n\nAgreed.", "177" ], [ "So, I mostly believed this in the first PublicFreakout that I saw where it was in the car. After this one, it just seems too staged. I'm pretty good at picking out people that are acting by the way they're talking and the mom just comes off as not genuine and acting.\n\nI'm not suggesting that this doesn't or can't happen; just expressing incredulity about this being a true example of it happening.\n\nEdit: You can really hear the voice acting in the first part of this [video](_URL_0_). Even the mom knocking when she is that upset and about to kick her daughter out is not believable. Then adding the caption about her mom not noticing that she is recording when there is no way the mom didn't hear her talking to people. It just all seems disingenuous and staged. And when the mom sounds completely overacting when she is saying \"Oh my god, this is unbelievable, this is fraud this is fraud\". Just sounds completely faked and overacted at that point. Maybe that's why the OP cut it out of their clip?\n\nEdit: Fixed the link", "337" ], [ "If done properly, HIIT is performed until the participant can literally no longer continue. Very few people will actually do cardio to that level. Weight training takes much less time to hit the positive gains and the \"burning overall fat\" point so it is much easier to get the fat-burning effect; especially for people that are very overweight and/or have poor cardio.", "412" ], [ "Yeah. I think whoever uploaded OP's source (or even just the OP) cut that portion out on purpose. That really makes it sound staged to me, not to mention how each video perfectly captures each stage of the moment. Not just talking her into voting, but after voting and then the moment the mom comes up to kick her out. The timing is just too perfect, the seemingly overacting in her voice, everything about this suggests it is staged to me.", "337" ], [ "Thanks for showing you don't know the different between tax rate and effective tax rate.\n\nTo help you get started, \"effective tax rate\" is the percentage of total income someone pays in taxes, regardless of tax bracket and after all deductions have been claimed.\n\nThe article you showed me is solely talking about tax rates and says nothing about the differences in the effective tax rates between the 50's and today.\n\nThe fact that you don't know this tells me how much weight I should give your (uninformed) opinion on the topic.", "606" ], [ "Suggesting the tax rates have declined is not something that can be disagreed with. It is verifiable, irrefutable fact.\n\nTax rates are defined by tax law. Whatever the tax says the tax rate is for a particular tax bracket, that is the tax rate. The tax rate does not change once it is set.\n\nEffective tax rate is completely different as it is a metroc.of the ACTUAL portion of income someone pays in taxes. Tax rates have changed. Why people actually pay in taxes (after deductions)has stayed about the same today as it was in the 1950's.\n\nWhen I mentioned that, you presented an article describing the tax rates having changed. If you understood the difference at the time you made the comment, you wouldn't have presented an article describing the change in tax bracket as a refutation against my comment saying the tax rates have changed but the effectivr tax rate is relatively the same.\n\nYou can't backtrack out of this one. Just accept that your reply regarding the tax rates was irrelevant and not a refutation of the point I am making. If you can't admit that, then we have nothing further to discuss.\n\nAnd for that, I'm out.", "322" ], [ "> ...don't have a right to free speech, or a speedy trial, or gun ownership because they aren't things that we have \"in nature.\" \n\nYou are misunderstanding what the other commenter is trying to say. They are saying that the Framers identified inalienable rights that are afforded to people by nature of existing, and then crafted the constitution to say that the government cannot infringe on those rights.\n\nHealthcare is not identified as an inalienable right that is afforded to people by the nature of existing. It is nonsensical to say so.\n\nWith that said, let's pretend that it is and compare that with other rights. One of those rights is the right to bear arms. Does this mean that the government must provide guns to every person and if the government fails to do so, that person's rights are not recognized? Let's compare it to the right to free speech. Does the government have a duty to ensure that the person exercises that right and uses mediums to express that right? No. The government has no duty to ensure someone is exercising a right. They just cannot limit one's access to exercise those rights. So, if Healthcare is a right, then the right is not a right to have healthcare provided by the government. The right is more that the individual would have access to healthcare. That means, if we are to assume that healthcare is a right, then the government cannot limit someone's access to healthcare.\n\nThe government does not provide people their rights. The framers identified certain inalienable rights afforded to all humans and designed the constitution to ensure that the government cannot infringe on those rights.\n\nWith all that said, healthcare is a service provided by private citizens who work for private practices with a profit incentive by either the private individual, private institution or private company.", "341" ], [ "To be honest, I thought a lot about this and I can find a way to support Red Flag laws but ONLY with certain crucial caveats.\n\nBefore I get there, I want to say that there are cases where the court system has been given the power to limit one's freedoms before the completion of due process. An immediate example is someone being denied bail while pending a trial/verdict. Effectively, this person is being denied certain freedoms before they are found guilty of a crime. Another example is with certain restraining orders. A restraining order can be awarded by a judge even if there isn't a crime. A restraining order can limit an individuals freedoms, especially if the restraining order has a no-contact order or a \"not within X feet\". This limits the person's freedom of movement in public spaces and in the absence of a crime or conviction, this would be without due process.\n\nThe common thread in those examples is that these decisions are made by a judge. The police or any other entity of the executive branch have NO power to enforce any such orders unless a judge has weighed the evidence and merits of the request and approved the limitation of those freedoms.\n\nIn my opinion, Red Flag laws could fall into the same category of these laws. I would support Red Flag laws so long as they can ONLY be enforced AFTER a judge has signed off on it, and there is a renewal process where the order must be reviewed (perhaps by a different judge each time?) with an appeal process and a guarantee of the order being temporary (if not reviewed or renewed, it is automatically withdrawn and the rights restored). The RF laws I would support also cannot have ANY ambiguous language that provides too much room for the judge's personal opinion so that the decision rests as much on their professional judicial capacity as possible without any personal influence whatsoever.\n\nGive those stipulations, I can support those types of Red Flag laws under the same logic that I support restraining orders and denying bail to certain individuals. And the police CANNOT have any decision making power; it must solely rest on the judicial system where a judge is the designated authority and in the absence of a judge's decision, then nothing can be done by the police.", "733" ], [ "When you use your blend to make patties, you roll them into a ball instead of forming them into patties straight away.\n\nThe \"smash\" part is when you put the ball on the cooking surface (usually a griddle or a flat-top of some sort), you \"smash\" the ball down to form the patty. When you do the \"smash\", you use a spatula and hold it downto get a nice, even sear on the bottom of the patty. Some cooking establishments will use a weighted cooking utensil (called a \"hamburger presser\" or \"steak weight\") so the cook doesn't have to hold the \"smash\" and can cook more burgers at once. When you flip it, you will give it another smash.\n\nThe purpose of the smash is it makes a nice, even crust across the burger. Forming a patty before cooking will result in a more rounded patty where the edges and some of the bottom might not get some of that crust/sear. Due to the \"smashing\", these burgers will generally be thinner. The patties are cooked individually and usually combined in doubles or triples and stacked (sometimes with cheese on each or stacked on the grill and the cheese placed on top and melted down). Very versatile. Very easy to do. Very good. Not for everyone as some people enjoy a nice, thick burger. The key is cooking with a high heat to get a very quick sear with the \"smash\" ensuring the sear goes all the way across the patty.\n\nWendy's is similar to a smash burger but doesn't get as much of the crust. Steak & Shake is probably as close to a smash burger as you can get from a national fast-food chain.\n\nHope that clarifies it!", "324" ], [ "> If someone is that much of a threat\n\nNot all threats or levels of threats are criminal and would lead to a detention. Within my examples, I mentioned restraining orders. In some cases, the restraining order is applied even in the absence of a chargeable offense or before due process is completed by way of a conviction. I think the same exact logic that justifies restraining orders and denying bail in certain situations, can extend to RF laws.\n\n > If you can't meet that burden of proof,\n\nWhen it comes to denial of bail, this done prior to the completion of due process. I don't see how someone can accept denying someone bail before due process is completed or accept that restraining orders can limit someone's rights without due process, and also reject Red Flag laws wholesale.\n\nI am a staunch conservative and have been my whole life. I own guns and have always lived in a household that had firearms. I took a lot of time to think through the logic of the Red Flag laws, and I think if they are adjudicated in the same way a judge can award a restraining order or deny bail prior to the completion of due process, then I can see certain VERY RESTRICTIVE Red Flag laws as beneficial.\n\nWhat I will also add, is that perhaps the stipulations and limitations I am placing on Red Flag laws that I would support, would make them inept and ineffective. If that is the case, then so be it. I will not support any Red Flag laws that give the police any authoritative control over restricting rights beyond what they already have, and any Red Flag laws that has an arbiter that is not an appointed judge, I completely oppose.", "733" ], [ "Generally speaking, I find that he strays away from Conservative values too often for me to consider him a \"classic right winger\". I wouldn't say he is a populist. I think the best description is to say that he is a right-of-center libertarian.\n\nOne of the primary reasons is some of his anti-capitalist views. Granted, he is NOT a socialist by any means, but he does have anti-Capitalist views; albeit they are well-intentioned.\n\nOne such example is his opposition to self-driving, automated trucks. He would support anti-Capitalist policies to ensure that truck-drivers are not pushed out of truck-driving jobs. He justifies this by saying that truck-driving is the largest job for adult males of a certain age group. The well-intentioned part comes in when he suggests that these truckers have these jobs because of a lack of skill/trade in other areas and self-driving trucks would cripple this demographic.\n\nThat is one such example but there are more. I am not suggesting that <PERSON> does not believe in Capitalism, but his policy propositions to stave off this particular job getting automated out of the work force, is certainly anti-Capitalist which pushes him much closer to the center than most \"classical right wingers\" would get categorized. To enforce these protections would take government intervention in the way of regulations or high-taxes to discourage businesses from replacing truck-drivers with self-driving semis.", "285" ], [ "> And when a person is denied bail they are present to defend themselves.\n\nAs with restraining orders, there is a court date and the person is notified of that and can defend themselves. For me to support Red Flag laws, they would have to afford the same opportunity to appear and plead their case to the judge before a \"Red Flag order\" is allowed to be signed by the judge.\n\n > Restraining orders don't really restrict ones rights\n\nBut they do. It can limit one's access to public spaces, their freedom of speech, etc.\n\n > ERPOs and RF laws restrict your rights and don't offer you a chance to defend yourself prior to restriction of your rights.\n\nAgain, I would ONLY support Red Flag laws or ERPOs if the individual is given the chance to defend themselves in court in the same way an individual is given the chance to plead their case to a judge when it comes to bail or Restraining Orders.\n\nI would support Red Flag laws ONLY if those stipulations are in place. Again, I find no reason that the same logic that justifies denying someone bail or awarding a restraining order against someone (when there isn't a conviction or criminal charges behind the restraining order), can't be used to justify Red Flag laws/ERPOs if they are treated in much the same way with the police not having ANY executive power without a judge's approval.", "733" ], [ "Yes. Judicial overreach is always a concern. I would propose that there is either an appeals process or a special court (with an odd number of judges) that can review ALL Red Flag orders to review the signing Judge's decision and uphold/overturn the decision. I'd imagine that Red Flag laws, if given the strict stipulations that I would support, would not get awarded very often so it is reasonable to presume that such a \"special court\" could quickly review such cases shortly after they are awarded by a local/circuit judge.\n\nThis would help sniff out judicial overreach and could work towards tweaking the laws and establishing a precedence to how the Red Flag orders should be applied and enforced.\n\nI would also propose that each renewal of the Red Flag order (let's say, a mandatory review every 30 days with an avenue of the individual applying for the order to be lifted at any point once it is applied) would require a different judge, if available, than all prior renewals that were awarded.\n\nThis is how I could support Red Flag laws from a conservative perspective. I would not, in any way, support the type of Red Flag laws being proposed by those on the left.", "699" ], [ "> !The answer is the first option. Between each symbol, the amount of dots increases or decreases based on how many spaces it takes to get to the next object that has the same symbol. Since we know the answer is a spade, you just count from the visible spade to the question mark, and you get 7.! < \n\n > !With all that said, this problem is a bad one (did you make it yourself?). The reason I say this is because given the rules that we know, the matrix becomes an impossible one. We know that there are 9 unique dot formations. Given the symbols that are revealed, we can surmise that each square will have a unique number of dots. We also know that the number of dots corresponds to the symbol in the corner and how many squares the symbols are separated from each other by. That rule is how we determined the number of dots in the missing square since each option had a spade as the symbol. Given those rules, we can attempt to fill in the missing squares. If you write out the possible options for each square and remove the possibilities that would duplicate numbers, then you can determine what number/symbol there are for each square. We know that the available numbers are 2, 4 and 5. Any option that includes those numbers can be removed as a possible option.! < \n\n > !With that logic in place, lets try and solve it. The middle-top (column-row) square would have these possible options: Heart-7, Spade-8 or Diamond-4. Given that 7 and 8 are already represented, then this square must be diamond-4. The left-middle square has these options - Heart-5, Spade-6 and Diamond-2. We can rule out 6 because it is already represented. Then, the middle-middle square, the options are Heart-4, Spade-5 and Diamond-1. Note: I am presuming that the 9 goes to a 1 when you count ascending. If you don't like this assumption, then you can start with the bottom-right square and count down from diamond-6 (which would make the top-left square 5, and ending at diamond-1 for the middle-middle square as you count along that progression); either direction you go, you end up with D-1. Since 1 is already taken up, we can rule that out. Now that we have outlined the possible options for each square, let me summarize that below with the known duplicate numbers removed:! < \n\n > !Middle-Top : D-4! < \n\n > !Left-Middle : H-5, D-2! < \n\n > !Middle-Middle : H-4, S-5! < \n\n > !Looking at these possible options, the middle-top must be D-4. This means that the H-4 for the middle-middle is ruled out and must be S-5. From there, we can assume that D-2 is the symbol for Left-Middle since the #5 must go in the middle-middle square. This is where it gets nonsensical to me. This would mean the Diamond symbol is represented 4 times in this matrix, while Heart is represented twice. I would think that having 3 symbols with 9 squares would mean that each symbol is represented 3 times. However, you cannot achieve this given the known rules and applying them with the squares provided in the puzzle. Not having each symbol represented 3 times in a puzzle like this is nonsensical. As a confirmation, I did check the possible options for the top right square while only using the provided squares (not using any of my deductions for the hidden squares), and the options are Spade-7, Heart-6 and Diamond-3. With that, we know that 3 and 6 are already used in the revealed squares, so the answer must be S-7. We can determine this even if this wasn't a multiple choice option and we ignore what the possibilities are for the hidden squares.! <", "87" ], [ "I wouldn't agree that those are a Catch-22. It says that the judge can weigh that, among 13 different other criteria, in making a judgment on the RPO.\n\nHowever, I don't think any judge would agree that simply meeting 8 and/or 13 would qualify \"a preponderance of evidence\" in legal definitions. Simply owning a firearm (8) or expressing desire to purchase one (13), without qualifying ANY of the other rules, would never be considered as a \"preponderance of the evidence that the respondent poses a significant danger of causing personal injury to self or others by having in his or her custody or control, purchasing, possessing, or receiving a firearm, the court shall issue a risk protection order for a period that it deems appropriate, up to and including, but not exceeding, 12 months.\"\n\nI have problems with that bill, but I wouldn't consider the existence of the criteria that you pointed out as issues with the bill. If any judge uses only 8 or 13, with no other evidence that qualifies any of the other 11 criteria outlined in that section, as meeting \"a preponderance of evidence\", then there would be swift ramifications for that judge as get held accountable for depriving someone of their rights by an unreasonable and unlawful application of that law.", "12" ], [ "Restraining Orders don;t always have to be attached to a criminal conviction. In some cases, the reasons provided to get a Restraining Order are not criminal in nature and there is no due process. A restraining order can be awarded even in the absence of a criminal charge or conviction. In that sense, it could be argued that restraining orders of that nature are a violation of an individual's freedoms (for example, a restraining order can limit one's access to public places and also limit their freedom of speech if it also includes a no-contact clause).\n\nAnother example is denying someone bail. If someone is denied bail, then this is limiting their freedoms and their rights before they have been convicted of a crime. Even under the \"innocent until proven guilty\", we as a society have accepted that in certain cases, it is reasonable to limit someone's freedoms by denying bail while pending a trial.\n\nIn both of the above examples, it requires a JUDGE to make that decision and sign off on the order. I find Red Flag laws could fall under the same logic that is used to justify the limitation of rights in the above examples.", "733" ], [ "I think with my very strict guidelines of what kind of Red Flag laws I would support, it really limits them.\n\nI would not agree with any of the Red Flag laws that I see proposed by Democrats, nor do I completely support the Red Flag laws my state has.\n\nHowever, I could theorize a Red Flag law that I would support. In that regard, I don't think I have ever seen one (passed or proposed) that I would completely support.", "744" ], [ "> ...**reportedly** at the [request of White House](_URL_0_) staff\n\nAnd even if they did, it could have been at the request of <PERSON> (the baby's uncle) and the grandfather and the White House staff made it happen.\n\n > <PERSON>, the child’s uncle, and brother of <PERSON>, said: “I think people are misconstruing President <PERSON>’s ideas. My brother was very supportive of <PERSON>.” \n > \n > The boy's grandfather told Spanish newspaper [*ABC*](_URL_0_) the family were \"very happy\" with Mr <PERSON>'s visit and that the president was \"kind and sympathetic\".  \n\n(all quotes are from the posted article)", "906" ], [ "> it’s your turn to answer for the grin\n\nYou assuming that the grin/thumbs up is something that needs to be answered for.\n\n > This is just another embarrassing example that you and your excuse making followers can’t wade out of. \n\nIf the people he is taking a picture with are supportive of <PERSON> and the uncle is smiling as well, it is likely that there was a pleasant conversation prior to the photo or perhaps that photographer said \"Smile!\" or \"Say cheese!\" to draw out a pleasant look.\n\nHonestly, if <PERSON> appeared remorseful, I say it's safe to assume you wouldn't give him credit for that either. I think you'd say he is playing it up for the camera, or you might say that he should be trying to lift their spirits instead.\n\nIn any case, your response proves my claim that you already drew your own conclusion and that nothing anyone could say would change your mind.", "480" ], [ "The burden of proof rests on the person making the POSITIVE claim that \"<PERSON> is a racist\".\n\nSaying \"<PERSON> isn't a racist\" is not making a POSITIVE claim that can be proven. You can't prove a negative.\n\nIn that case, you are left with the burden of proof to prove that the absolute claim of \"zero evidence\" is a false claim. You can't ask someone to prove that there is \"zero evidence that <PERSON> is racist\".\n\nWhy? Let's do a thought experiment. If someone says \"There is zero evidence that <PERSON> is racist\", and that statement is 100% true in this hypothetical, then how might someone prove that? To prove that, they would have to provide EVERY bit of literature on <PERSON> that has ever been made and show how ALL of that has \"no evidence\" that <PERSON> is racist. And even then, it wouldn't be proof that he isn't, within his mind, a racist but just doesn't express it.\n\nSo, what should be done? If someone makes an absolute claim that can't be proven, then all you have to do is say that they are making an absolute claim; and then provide ONE piece of evidence that falsifies the absolute claim. And if <PERSON> is a racist and you assert that there is not \"zero evidence that <PERSON> is a racist\", then it should be an easy task for you to provide ONE piece of evidence that falsifies the absolute claim.", "977" ], [ "> Saying a person can’t do their job impartially because of where their parents were born \n\nThat's not what he said. <PERSON> was suggesting that the judge on his Trump University lawsuit might not be impartial because the judge was a child of Mexican immigrants AND was a member of one of the largest pro-immigrant movements in the country. The suggestion was that <PERSON>'s campaign platform around anti-illegal immigration, immigration reform and building the wall might cause a conflict of interest in a judge that is a public pro-immigration advocate. I don't find this unreasonable. <PERSON> later praised the judge for his impartiality in the judge's ruling on the Trump University lawsuit as well as the same judge's ruling on the border-wall construction in Southern California.\n\n > Painting a whole ethnicity as rapists and murders\n\nThis is objectively wrong. <PERSON> said that rapists and murderers were among the illegal immigrants crossing the border. Considering the fact that illegal immigrants have been charged with murder in the U.S. as well as the fact that a high percentage of females are raped during their transit to the U.S., it is a fact-based conclusion that there are murderers and rapists crossing the borders. <PERSON> never said that ALL illegal crossings are rapists and murderers.\n\n > with some fine people in it \n\n<PERSON> did not say that the neo-Nazis or the white supremacists were \"fine people\". He was specifically referring to non-violent people that solely wished to support or oppose the removal of the <PERSON> statue and the renaming of the park. These people existed and it was well documented. They came out publicly and denounced the hate-groups and their ideologies, and said that they simply wanted to oppose the removal of the <PERSON> statue and the renaming of the park. Given that these are the people <PERSON> was referring to \"on both sides\" of the oppose/support of removing the statue, and given <PERSON>'s statement almost immediately following the \"both sides\" comment that he was not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists, because they should be \"totally condemned\", then it is obvious that <PERSON> was NOT calling them \"fine people\".\n\n > ...is racist. \n\nGiven that I explained how each of these examples are NOT evidence that <PERSON> is racist, this makes your conclusion of \"is racist\" a false conclusion built on false premises.", "799" ], [ "Yeah. The ref didn't handle this one properly at all. I remember the announcers afterwards saying that <PERSON> should have been given a DQ-win instead of being basically encouraged by the ref to continue the fight. I know the ref can only say so much because they shouldn't be encouraging the fighter, but if <PERSON> can get a DQ-win from an eye poke when he CLEARLY could continue, <PERSON> should have been allowed to take the DQ-win.", "252" ], [ "Are you talking about a recovered person or the reinfected person?\n\nIn order to be contagious, not only do you have to have a significant enough viral load, but the virus has to be present in the respiratory system. Both need to occur in order to have respiratory droplets that carry enough of the virus to pose a significant risk to someone contracting it.\n\nIf someone is infected but their viral load is so low that they test negative from the PCR test (more reliable as it detects the virus itself, the other test just looks for antigens related to the virus), then at the time they test negative they are not contagious as the viral load is low enough that even if the virus is present in the respiratory tract, that not enough of the virus is there to infect others through respiratory droplets. This would stand to reason that a REinfected person would be contagious if the virus has reasserted itself to the level that the viral load is significant enough to cause infectious respiratory droplets. If the PCR test can detect the virus, it is assumed that they have a viral load level that makes them contagious.\n\nIf you are talking about a recovered person, who has not been reinfected, then the same logic applies: If someone is recovered AND immune, then their body can eradicate the virus to the point that the virus cannot take hold in the body to where it is either not present at all, or so miniscule that the virus does not replicate enough to get to a viral load where the person becomes contagious.\n\nHopefully that answers your question. It is important to note that there are over 58 million people identified as \"recovered\" from the virus and less than 100 that have been \"confirmed\" as reinfections.\n\nEdit to add: I will point out that it is not known if these reinfections are people that were fully and completely recovered (as in 0 virus left in the body) and then re-contracted it. Remember, testing is only sensitive enough to detect a certain viral load. It is possible, and I'm sure they are doing their best to study these cases, that the virus was still present and was able to reassert itself in the body meaning that they didn't fully recover and the virus was not completely eradicated (this is one possible scenario of how someone could become \"reinfected\"; more study is required but it is so rare, that it might be impossible to draw conclusions).", "266" ], [ "Yes. If the virus is present in any capacity and not showing symptoms, they are considered asymptomatic. However, being asymptomatic does not mean contagious. The virus must be present enough in the respiratory track to cause the infected person to have contagious respiratory droplets. Many people get the cold or flu and are not contagious because the virus is not present enough in the respiratory track to make the person contagious. Just ONE virus is NOT enough to make someone contagious or for someone to become infected. Hence why it is not necessary to refine the PCR test to where it can detect any presence of the virus; it is sufficient for its purpose to be sensitive enough to detect a significant viral load (I forget how sensitive it is so I apologize for not sharing the exact figure). This is also why they don't do blood or mucosal testing for COVID which would be the much more sensitive than the PCR test.", "266" ], [ "If the risk of \"sorry\" is so extremely low, then it doesn't logically follow that we all need to take additional measures to be \"safe\".\n\nFor example, the risk of contracting small pox is so low, that very few lines of work require getting small pox inoculations even though the \"sorry\" of getting smallpox is a death rate around 30%.\n\nYes, being safe is important, but at some point the risk of \"sorry\" must be taken into account. Following your logic to its extreme, the U.S. should ban pools on private residences since the \"sorry\" of owning a pool is one of the leading causes of accidental death in young children.\n\nIf there are 58 million recovered COVID patients, and we have less than 100 known reinfections of which are yet not well-understood, that means out of 58 million people that should be immune, less than 100 reinfections have occurred. Is that \"sorry\" worth being \"safe\" for to the effect that societal functions are significantly impacted?", "912" ], [ "If 58 million people remained infectious after recovering from the virus, we would know it.\n\nIt required a certain viral load, AND that viral load being in the respiratory track, for someone to be contagious. Of the 58 million people having recovered, less than 100 of them are known to have become reinfected to the affect of being infectious to others.\n\nYou can attempt to diminish my comments to \"muh freedom\", but there is a lot of \"sorries\" you already accept in order to exercise your \"muh freedom\" that you don't talk about. This does not need to be politicized or controversial. Of the 58 million recovered, less than 100 have become possibly infectious again. That is such a staggeringly low number, a number much lower than other \"sorries\" you don't stay safe for, that it is most likely not worth the social, economic, personal, and professional ramifications that come from the \"safe\" measures associated with that particular \"sorry\". 100 out of 58million is less than 2-millionth of a percent. I don't find that risk of \"sorry\" happening to be significant enough to perpetually remain in a lockdowned society and forever alter our social interactions.", "912" ], [ "> Let’s go back to your pool example. Imagine if lifeguards didn’t follow the better safe then be sorry rule. What if we just stopped putting fences up around pools? How about we allow kids to dive in the shallow end? All of these things are put in place to protect you, even if you’re not likely to die.\n\nAnd yet, with all of those measures, drowning is still one of the leading causes of accidental death in young children. If you want to make the argument that > 100 out 58 million is a risk worth perpetually remaining in lockdown and permanently altering our social interactions, then it stands to reason by YOUR logic, that we should do even more to prevent the accidental death of drowning. Why not make it illegal to own in-ground pools on private resideNces?Such social measures make sense if given all of the safety precautions you identified are still not enough to keep drowning out of the leading causes of accidental death, right?\n\nI'm not trying to be condescending. I am just making the point that there are many, many \"sorries\" that are greater than 100/58,000,000 thatwe don't do everything we can to avoid because of either individual freedoms or the impact oto society f \"doing everything we can to avoid it\" is not deemed worth it by the public.\n\n > How is this so different from <PERSON>?\n\nI am specifically talking about the chance of a recovered person becoming reinfected again. Notice that nothing I have said has applied to society as a whole. Hopefully you did not extrapolate my points on this specific matter onto the snecessary ocietal measures we currently take. If you did, then it is a strawman, albeit I grant it is probably an unintentional one.\n\n > You can say all you want but after millions have died and thousands more are dying each day.\n\nI agree. I am not talking about the societal measures we took in the past or are taking now. I am talking about the specifics of continued societal measures regarding people who have recovered and/or are vaccinated.\n\n > I’d rather be the person who looks silly wearing a mask too long, rather than the person who realizes in another 10 years that they were part of the problem.\n\nI agree. I have worn a mask and practiced social distancing since it was made known we should do so. What I am talking about is not that, but specifically speaking about the \"sorry\" relating to the recovered/vaccinated and the potential for reinfection.", "651" ], [ "Statement from <PERSON> addressing this, I do hope you read all of it:\n\n > I took the American Board of Ophthalmology (the largest governing body in ophthalmology) boards in 1995, passed them on my first attempt (as well as three times during residency), and was therefore board-certified under this organization for a decade. \n\n > In 1997, I, along with 200 other young ophthalmologists formed the National Board of Ophthalmology to protest the American Board of Ophthalmology's decision to grandfather in the older ophthalmologists and not require them to recertify.\n\n > I thought this was hypocritical and unjust for the older ophthalmologists to exempt themselves from the recertification exam.\n\n > In forming NBO, the younger ophthalmologists agreed to require recertification for all ophthalmologists.\n\n > In my protest to the American Board, I asked, “If the ABO thinks that quality of care would be improved by board testing every decade, shouldn’t this apply to all doctors, not just those of a certain age? In fact, many of us argue that the older ophthalmologists need recertification even more since they are more distant from their training.\n\n > Is it fair that the ophthalmologist down the street can claim board certification, without renewing it, but that a younger ophthalmologist, who passed the same boards, is disallowed?\n\n > This is the kind of hypocritical power play that I despise and have always fought against. It reminds me of congress passing health care legislation but exempting themselves from their own laws. I protested to the ABO, as did many other younger doctors. This is when I came up with the idea of creating a competitor to the ABO, and formed a new organization, the National Board of Ophthalmology. Keep in mind that neither of these groups have anything to do with medical licensure, which is handled by the state boards.\n\n > ABO claims it is illegal to call for recertification of all ophthalmologists. This is untrue. ABO is a private group and create any rules they wish. (even discriminatory policies based on age) Having all its members recertify is not illegal just impractical because the older ophthalmologists will vote against it.\n\n > ABO argues that the older ophthalmologists were given \"lifetime certification.\" This is also untrue. The certificates of the older ophthalmologist do not refer or explicitly grant \"lifetime\" certification.\n\n > ABO argues that they are the legitimate organization because they are recognized by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). They fail to explain that ABO helped found ABMS and gets to vote on who is approved by ABMS. One can imagine why ABMS and ABO would not want to approve a competitor.\n\nTL;DR - <PERSON> certification was more strict than that of the ABO since <PERSON> board required ALL ophthalmologists to take the recertification exam; <PERSON> started the NBO because younger ophthalmologists were required to take the recertification exam but older ophthalmologists were not.\n\nI wonder what you will do with this information as it is clear you were either misled about it or were misinformed...\n\nEdit: Adding a source that speaks about this issue from within the ophthalmology community: _URL_0_", "679" ], [ "I added a link that includes an article written by an ophthalmologist talking about the issue from within. Perhaps give that read.\n\nRegardless of what you think about <PERSON>, it is objectively true that he started the NBO (with 200 certified ophthalmologists backing him) in protest to the ABO not requiring recertification for ophthalmologists that were certified before 1992 but requiring all ophthalmologists certified after 1992 to recertify every ten years. He was advocating for ALL ophthalmologists, regardless of certification date, to require recertification. Regardless of what you think of <PERSON>, his protest was for MORE stringent certification and not less.\n\nI can defend him on this because it is objectively defendable. It is not a contradiction to accept the defenses here AND hold the criticism you stated. He can be all the things you stated AND still be acknowledged as a sitting Senator that volunteered his professional medical services to help with the pandemic.", "850" ], [ "I find it disingenuous to sea-lion for sources when something can be Googled and discovered in 5 seconds. This is not some formal debate. If I was speaking about something that was obscure and buried in some medical journal that would take quite a bit of effort to locate, I would provide a source. I am not going to pander to your demand for a source when a minimal level of effort is required to locate millions of sources speaking about the information.", "566" ], [ "> If I have already had COVID-19 and recovered, do I still need to get vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine? \n > \n > \n > \n > **Yes.** Due to the severe health risks associated with COVID-19 and the fact that re-infection with COVID-19 is possible, vaccine should be offered to you regardless of whether you already had COVID-19 infection. CDC is providing recommendations to federal, state, and local governments about [who should be vaccinated first.](_URL_0_) \n > \n > At this time, experts do not know how long someone is protected from getting sick again after recovering from COVID-19. The immunity someone gains from having an infection, called natural immunity, varies from person to person. Some early evidence suggests natural immunity may not last very long. \n > \n > We won’t know how long immunity produced by vaccination lasts until we have more data on how well the vaccines work. \n > \n > Both natural immunity and vaccine-induced immunity are important aspects of COVID-19 that experts are trying to learn more about, and CDC will keep the public informed as new evidence becomes available.\n\nThis was specifically talking about getting the vaccine if you've already recovered, it does not reference continued safety precautions regarding the recovered or vaccinated, which is what we're talking about here. Hypothetically, if the rate of reinfection is 100/58,000,000, then that would mean the risk is so low, that it might not be socially prudent to continue the drastic measures that we need to combat the pandemic while most people are never-infected and/or unvaccinated.", "235" ], [ "Your search was obviously narrowed to a very specific search term that required \"100\" and \"infected\" to not only be present in the result but also they had to be within a few words of each other.\n\nWe both know that's not how you would search for the number of known and confirmed reinfections.\n\nWith that said, I'll grant that my \"less than 100\" could be out of date information and perhaps there are more confirmed reinfections, but that doesn't change my overall point unless the known/confirmed reinfections becomes significant enough to warrant perpetual safety measures associated with the pandemic.\n\nAnd to that, here is a live tracker that provides the known/confirmed cases of reinfection worldwide: [_URL_1_](_URL_1_)\n\nI'll add this as I do with most sources I link that are not well known: [_URL_0_](_URL_0_)", "266" ], [ "To be fair, the effective tax rate is the more important figure when trying to compare different taxes from different times in U.S. history. Effective tax rate is the % of someone's income that was collected in taxes and paid to the government. This figure comes from the combined taxes paid throughout all of the tax brackets the individual falls in, after all their deductions and exemptions are considered, and their final tax bill is shown. Take the tax bill and divide it by their income, and you get the \"effective tax rate\".\n\nThe reason I point this out is that even though the taxes were as high as 90+% in pre-Regan days, the effective tax rate was relatively the same AND tax revenue as a percentage of total GDP also remained the same.\n\nThis is to say that even though the tax brackets did scale much higher than today, the amount people actually paid in taxes back then is about the same percentage of the income people pay today.\n\nYou can make the argument that taxes today should be higher for \"the rich\", but just pointing out that the brackets were higher back then as an argument for raising them today doesn't support that argument when the effective tax rates from \"back then\" was about the same as it is today.\n\nI would be all for keeping the brackets as they are, but simplifying the tax code so there are not as many avenues of reducing one's tax burden that you have to be \"rich\" to take advantage of. This should increase overall tax revenue (hopefully reducing our deficit to the point of having a surplus) without having to make the tax bracket reach up to 90+%.", "143" ], [ "> This revealed 28 suspected cases in which someone tested positive at least twice during follow-up.\n\nThis is \"suspected cases\". What is important to note is that in order to deem these as a reinfection, you must KNOW that the person was fully recovered. The reason this is important is that someone that is deemed recovered could have a viral load below the sensitivity of the tests, all symptoms have subsided, but still have the virus present. It needs to be determined that the reinfections are true reinfections and not just people that seemingly recovered, did not have a viral load that resulted in a positive test, but had not fully eradicated the virus and it reasserted itself in the individual and symptoms returned.\n\n > This is more than 12,000 higher than the '100 in 58 million' that you cited (.00000172%).\n\n\"100 in 58 million\" would be .000172%.", "266" ], [ "To be fair, that sub is not moderated and does not require Mensa membership to join. Most of the posts are \"how did you score in this online test\" or \"how did I get this question wrong\" with the rest rounding out as obvious trolls just having fun.\n\nThere is a private sub called mensaverified that you have to prove Mensa membership to join; that is much less toxic and elitists. The content posted there is much more diverse and not anything like what is seen on the crossposted sub in the OP.", "728" ], [ "Most of the \"TRILLIONS\" was jus the stock market returning back to normal. The people citing the \"money made\" by corporations was just looking at the stock value rise around after it had dipped quite a bit. If you are to look at these figures objectively, then you would first acknowledge that they \"lost TRILLIONS\" before the stock market started to recover. If you had $1,000, then lost $900, and then made a $1000 for a final total of $1100, would you really say that this person gained $1000? No, you wouldn't.\n\nAnd the only way they \"made TRILLIONS\" was when the market started to recover because they \"lost TRILLIONS\" as the market crashed. Without the crash, they wouldn't have \"made TRILLIONS\".\n\nAlso, most of the relief for businesses are aimed at small businesses.", "200" ], [ "If you think those links refutes anything I've said, then you really don't know what you're talking about.\n\nJust to help you, the first article is talking about the total value of Apple as a company. This is typically calculated as the current stock price for Apple and then how many shares exist for Apple. When you multiple these two figures together, you get the market value. What this article from 2018 doesn't show is what you said about corporations making \"TRILLIONS\" since March '20.\n\nThe 2nd article is basically an update on the first article showing how Apple's market value makes it the first company to reach 2 trillion in market value. This still doesn't support your claim.\n\nThe last article is behind a paywall but is just a profile of <PERSON>, the founder and majority owner of Amazon. Sure, he gained billions since March '20. However, nearly all of that comes from having lost billions before then as Amazon's stock value dipped. Since then, it recovered and then continued to grow. Now it shouldn't be a surprise that the most popular online purchasing company would stand to profit from the increase in online-purchasing during a pandemic that saw people reduce their public interaction by doing things such as ordering online.\n\nNow, do you care to actually refute anything I said, or are you content with just sharing unrelated links and throwing out ad hominems?", "598" ], [ "No, he did not specify that at all. Nothing in the below interview is specific to N-95 masks. In fact, the points he brought against universal mask-wearing apply to any kind of mask.\n\nSuggesting he mean n95 masks when he said this is revisionist history. Don't be like the <PERSON> supporters everyone made fun of for 4 years. Acknowledge the facts and then present a counter argument (such as \"this was back in March and he has completely changed his position on this and fully supports the CDC guidelines regarding wearing masks in public).\n\n***<PERSON>, March 8:*** *There’s a lot of confusion among people, and misinformation, surrounding face masks. Can you discuss that?*\n\n***Fauci:*** *The masks are important for someone who’s infected to prevent them from infecting someone else… Right now in the United States, people should not be walking around with masks.*\n\n***LaPook:*** *You’re sure of it? Because people are listening really closely to this.*\n\n***Fauci:*** *…There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences — people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.*\n\n***LaPook:*** *And can you get some schmutz, sort of staying inside there?*\n\n***Fauci:*** *Of course, of course. But, when you think masks, you should think of health care providers needing them and people who are ill. The people who, when you look at the films of foreign countries and you see 85% of the people wearing masks — that’s fine, that’s fine. I’m not against it. If you want to do it, that’s fine.*\n\n***LaPook:*** *But it can lead to a shortage of masks?*\n\n***Fauci:*** *Exactly, that’s the point. It could lead to a shortage of masks for the people who really need it.*", "855" ], [ "The rotation is pretty static. Sometimes they shift as they add new legendary characters, but the order doesn't generally change.\n\n<PERSON> (a pretty active content creator) has an Infographics section on his Discord. Join it and check through the individual channels and there is one that has the most up-to-date schedule. Doc Oct was a recent event that changed the order a bit and then <PERSON> is a new legendary character so I'm not sure how current the latest graphic will be but it will be a fairly reliable guide.\n\nDoc Oct did just happen, so you are looking at about 3.5 to 4 months before he comes around again. However, as a new character, you probably aren't unlocking all the X-Force characters in time to get him next time around, so I wouldn't put too much time into it. Negasonic is not going to be farmable for you for a long time and X-23 is a long grind in War which requires you to be level 20 AND particpate in War.\n\nMy advice for new players is to focus on Defenders + Pun (all farmable, used in Block Party flash event, a few of the daily challenges like the gold one, good all around team for war/raid/blitz to help with early content, hero campaign, etc.), Guardians of the Galaxy (easily farmed, access to Star Lord, another decent Blitz/War/Raid team for early content), and Sinister 6 (works for Shuri and Invisible Woman unlocks).\n\nSome of my advice might be a bit out of date so if anyone else has some critiques of my suggestions or anything to add, please do so!", "491" ], [ "2 things: \n\n1) Cardio can improve the blood flow to your cardiovascular system, including blood flow to the penis. Are you taking any supplements? Certain types of supplements can increase heart rate and blood flow that can hsve a marginal effect on size (you'll recognize this more as having a stronger erection, which can increase your measurements)\n\n2) If you're cutting down your body fat %, then that includes whatever fat that accumulated around your pubic bone at the base of the penis. Even though your previous measurements might have been bone pressed as well, you still have fat underneath the skin and muscle that could have gotten in the way of completely bone-pressing during your previous measurements.", "115" ], [ "1) I didn't trim anything. I copied and pasted from a website that everyone would recognize as a liberal-biased media source.\n\n2) Does the missing portion from the quote change the context of what <PERSON> is talking about? I provided these quotes as a refutation against the claim that <PERSON> was talking about n95 masks and not regular masks. Does anything in this interview imply that <PERSON> was referring to n95 masks and not masks in general, with or without the trimmed section?\n\n***Fauci***: *The masks are important for someone who's infected to prevent them from infecting someone else. Now, when you see people and look at the films in China and South Korea whatever, everybody's wearing a mask. Right now in the United States people should not be walking around with masks.*\n\nIn fact, when <PERSON> changed his tune in June and was asked about the above quote and why he is now encouraging masks when he didn't in March, he had this to say:\n\n*\"We were concerned the public health community, and many people were saying this, were concerned that it was at a time when personal protective equipment, including the N95 masks and the surgical masks, were in very short supply”*\n\nSo even when he spoke in June about why he said not to worry about wearing masks in March, his statement implies that he was talking about any PPE masks and not just N95 masks; which contradicts the claim I was refuting in my original comment.\n\nAgain, the original claim by the comment I replied to said that <PERSON> was talking about N95 masks in his comments in March about not wearing masks. I pulled a quote that, admittedly, excluded the portion you're referring to as the \"relevant line\"; but that \"relevant line\" doesn't support the original claim nor does it change the context of the quote I pulled. Furthermore, <PERSON>'s own words in June when pressed about changing his tone provide additional evidence that <PERSON>'s original comments in March were not specific to N95 masks and that he was referring to masks in general.", "855" ], [ "> He's clearly talking about saving masks for healthcare workers here, which seems to be his main point.\n\nNothing I said nor any of the quotes I provided are trying to refute this. What I am refuting is the claim made in the original comment I replied to that <PERSON> was specifically talking about N95 masks and not masks in general. Nothing in either of his quotes suggests that <PERSON>'s comments were about N95 masks and not masks in general. If you are not arguing for the claim \"<PERSON> was only talking about N95 masks\" or not arguing against my counterargument, then you're speaking on a different topic than I am and I replied to.\n\n > And his statement on masks not being very effective for the person wearing the mask is true. The mask wearing is to protect other people, not yourself.\n\nNothing I said refutes this nor was my comments intended to refute anything about this quote.\n\n > This was on March 8th when there was very little community spread but huge paranoia. We didn't know how effective this disease spread through asymptomatic people yet so if you were sick you were supposed to stay home.\n\nThis doesn't change the fact that the original comment that I replied to was claiming that <PERSON>'s comments in March were specific to N95 masks. The quotes I provided were specifically intended to refute the claim that <PERSON> wasn't talking about masks in general but was only talking about specialized masks like N95 masks.\n\nAny response you provide that is not a specific refutation of the counterargument I am making is just a strawman on your part OR you're arguing a separate topic that I did not involve myself in nor am I interested to engage in.\n\nIf you don't have a refutation against my counterargument against the claim that <PERSON> was referring to N95 masks, then you are not engaged in the topic or purpose of my original comment.", "855" ], [ "<PERSON> in March:\n\n > ***LaPook****: There's a lot of confusion among people and misinformation surrounding face masks, can you discuss that?* \n > \n > ***Fauci****: The masks are important for someone who's infected to prevent them from infecting someone else. Now, when you see people and look at the films in China and South Korea whatever, everybody's wearing a mask. Right now in the United States people should not be walking around with masks.* \n > \n > ***LaPook****: You're sure of it? Because people are listening really closely to this.* \n > \n > ***Fauci****: Right now, people should not be worried. There's no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And often there are unintended consequences. People keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.* \n > \n > ***LaPook****: And can you get some schmutz sort of staying inside there?* \n > \n > ***Fauci****: Of course, but when you think mask you should think of health care providers needing them and people who are ill. The people who when you look at the films of foreign countries and you see 85% of the people wearing masks that's fine, that's fine. I'm not against it if you want to do it that's fine.”* \n > \n > ***LaPook:*** *But it can lead to a shortage of masks?* \n > \n > ***Fauci:*** *Exactly, that’s the point. It could lead to a shortage of masks for the people who really need it.*\n\n & #x200B;\n\n<PERSON> in June:\n\n > *“We were concerned the public health community, and many people were saying this, were concerned that it was at a time when personal protective equipment, including the N95 masks and the surgical masks, were in very short supply,” <PERSON> told The Street. \"We wanted to make sure the people, namely, the healthcare workers, who were brave enough to put themselves in harm's way to take care of people who you know were infected with coronavirus, and the danger of them getting infected. We did not want them to be without the equipment they needed.\"*\n\n & #x200B;\n\nIt's revisionist history to suggest <PERSON> was referring to the specialized N95 masks either in the original statements made on 60 minutes in March or when he clarified in June why he said that in March about wearing masks.", "855" ], [ "I'm sorry to be so blunt, but you're wrong. <PERSON> did say, in March on a 60 minutes interview, that people did not need to wear masks. Here is a portion of the exchange that included \"Right now in the United States people should not be walking around with masks.\"\n\n<PERSON> in March:\n\n > ***<PERSON>****: There's a lot of confusion among people and misinformation surrounding face masks, can you discuss that?* \n***Fauci****: The masks are important for someone who's infected to prevent them from infecting someone else. Now, when you see people and look at the films in China and South Korea whatever, everybody's wearing a mask. Right now in the United States people should not be walking around with masks.* \n***LaPook****: You're sure of it? Because people are listening really closely to this.* \n***Fauci****: Right now, people should not be worried. There's no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And often there are unintended consequences. People keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.* \n***LaPook****: And can you get some schmutz sort of staying inside there?* \n***Fauci****: Of course, but when you think mask you should think of health care providers needing them and people who are ill. The people who when you look at the films of foreign countries and you see 85% of the people wearing masks that's fine, that's fine. I'm not against it if you want to do it that's fine.* \n***LaPook:*** *But it can lead to a shortage of masks?* \n***Fauci:*** *Exactly, that’s the point. It could lead to a shortage of masks for the people who really need it.*\n\n<PERSON> in June when asked about telling people not to wear masks:\n\n > *“We were concerned the public health community, and many people were saying this, were concerned that it was at a time when personal protective equipment, including the N95 masks and the surgical masks, were in very short supply,” <PERSON> told The Street. \"We wanted to make sure the people, namely, the healthcare workers, who were brave enough to put themselves in harm's way to take care of people who you know were infected with coronavirus, and the danger of them getting infected. We did not want them to be without the equipment they needed.\"*", "855" ], [ "I'm sorry, but this one line from <PERSON> directly contradicts your counterpoints.\n\n > Right now in the United States people should not be walking around with masks.\n\nHe even gives reasons why it might be counterproductive to wear masks:\n\n > Right now, people should not be worried. There's no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And often there are unintended consequences. People keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.\n\nYou're right that masks weren't as readily available then as they are now, but if your counterpoints are true, <PERSON> or someone would have recommended homemade face coverings and probably had a demonstration on how to convert garments into a facecovering that would have been better than saying \"no one needs to be walking around with a mask\".\n\nI do appreciate you providing counterpoints, but I don't find them compelling.", "855" ], [ "The comments I provided prove that he flipflopped. He originally said not to wear masks, period. He didn't say not to wear N95 masks, he didn't say save them for the healthcare workers, he said \"right now... people should not be walking around with masks\". By June, he was saying everyone should be wearing masks. Regardless of providing specific as to why he originally said not to wear masks, he still said it.\n\nThat's the \"flipflop\" which you are arguing against. You are arguing against the notion that he flipflopped by suggesting he just \"detailed his specifics\". Sorry, but that is abject mental gymnastics. The 2nd quote doesn't support your point, it just explains why he was saying one thing in March and then said the opposite in June. That's the exact definition of a flipflop.", "855" ], [ "Nothing you've said here refutes, with supporting evidence, anything I've said in any of the comments I've made on this post.\n\nMy comments on this thread refuted three different claims made by various people.\n\nClaim 1: During his 60 minutes interview, <PERSON> wasn't talking about all masks, just the medical masks used by Healthcare workers.\n\nClaim 2: <PERSON> never said that people shouldn't wear masks.\n\nClaim 3: <PERSON> didn't flip flop on the issue.\n\nThe quotes I provided directly refute these 3 claims. Nothing you've provided counters this refutation outside of your own mental gymnastics and/or speculation surrounding <PERSON>'s comments.\n\nIt is objectively true that <PERSON> said people shouldn't be wearing masks unless they were infected or were a Healthcare worker in the March interview. It is objectively true that <PERSON> was referring to masks and not just the ones Healthcare workers need. It is objectively true that <PERSON> said one thing in March and then changed his position later. It is objectively true that <PERSON>'s comments in June is objective proof that <PERSON> told people not to wear masks.\n\nTo continue to argue against these objectively true statements requires an Olympic level of mental gymnastics. I find it no longer interesting, meaningful or fruitful to continue to argue with someone who is arguing against objective facts.\n\nAnd for that, I'm out.", "855" ], [ "If you LISTENDED to him saying it, you'd know the tone was sarcastic and in jest.\n\nYou're not being objective if you're taking the exact words and forcing it to mean what you want it to mean rather than accepting and understanding the context of what was said.\n\nThis is no different than the \"both sides\" statement while ignoring the \"and I'm not talking about the neo-nazis or white supremacists, they should be condemned totally\" and then saying 'he called neo-nazis and white supremacists good people\".", "730" ], [ "Because the media were using the increased infection numbers, that was a direct result of expanded testing, against him without acknowledging that the increased infection numbers was a direct result of the expanded testing that they have been asking <PERSON> to do.\n\nThe media chides <PERSON> for not expanding testing.\n\n<PERSON> expands testing.\n\nAs a direct result of the expanded testing, infection numbers increase rapidly.\n\nThe media chides <PERSON> for the infection numbers rapidly increasing without acknowledging it was a directand expected result of the expanded testing.\n\n<PERSON> makes it a point that the infection numbers would go down if they stopped testing, pointing out the media's.\n\nAt no point did <PERSON> take ANY action to decrease testing; this fact, along with my other points, proves that <PERSON> never wanted to decrease testing nor did he ever work towards decreasing testing. In fact, the opposite true; not only has he worked towards continuing to expand testing, he has supported the development of the rapid test and his administration hosted a press conference that talked about it and demonstrated it. All of this in the interest in expanding testing even though the media used the increase in case numbers, due to the expanded testing, against him.", "19" ], [ "No. He was complaining about the media using the numbers against him when the increase in numbers was an inevitable consequence of expanded testing.\n\nIts not that hard to understand. A little bit of nuance goes a long way.\n\nYes. He was joking and making a point that the media shouldn't be harping on the increase in infection numbers so much since it was an inevitable result of the expanded testing.\n\nAnd yes, they should, but they should have acknowledged that the increase in numbers was a direct and expected result of the expanded testing. They did not and used the increased infection against him without pointing out that it was inevitable to follow from expanded testing.\n\nHopefully you can see the problem with the media doing that.\n\nI hsve nothing more to say on the topic.\n\nAnd for that, I'm out.", "19" ], [ "Context is more important than the words.\n\nHe never told his people to actually slow down testing.\n\nHe never slowed down testing.\n\nThe context in which he said these statements was always surrounding rhetoric associated with the media using the increased infection against him even though it was a direct and expected result of the expanded testing.\n\nHis points was that if testing was stopped, the media wouldn't be able to use the increased infection numbers against him, pointing out their double standard in saying \"<PERSON> needs to expand testing\" and then when he did to change to \"look at all these new infections\" without admitting it was a result of the expanded testing.\n\nIf you can't understand this, then we have nothing further to discuss.", "19" ], [ "The testing did not go down over all of September.\n\nIn mid September, there was a decrease of dialy testing. But you have to prove that this was because <PERSON> (according to your side's argument) told his people to stop testing.\n\nThink about that for a second. So <PERSON> tells his people to stop testing, so the front-line Healthcare workers stopped administering tests? Right. Because that's how it works (it doesn't).\n\nIn fact, by mid-late September, there were daily record highs in testing numbers, exceeding over one million tests per day.", "266" ], [ "Most developed countries that the left likes to point to for progress America should take have pretty strict Voter ID laws (where any form of government ID, certain employee badges if they require similar prior-verification as government issued ID, etc.) where a valid identification is required to vote.\n\nI don't find it unreasonable to require a voter ID to vote in person and some form of nationwide enforced signature matching for mail-in/absentee voting (some states have very lax laws when it comes to validating mail-in/absentee ballots).\n\nI'd also think it reasonable to allow people to vote at any polling station but the systems are all linked so the person receives a ballot appropriate to where they are registered to vote. This would greatly reduce the need for mail-in/absentee balloting.\n\nThats just a couple of items off the top of my head and I don't see how any of these would be considered voter suppression at face value.", "350" ], [ "\"Anyone who supports <PERSON>\"\n\nThat's a generalization.\n\nYour \"second\" affirms that a generalization was made even though your first contradicts the notion that a generalization was made.\n\nYou literally defeated your own argument.\n\nAnd yes, it would be a generalization because not all Democrats are pro-choice. Not all Democrats are pro-Israel.\n\nIf the belief was a requirement to entry into the *insert group label*, then it wouldn't be a generalization but a characteristic of the group (such as \"Christians believe <PERSON> is the son of god\" since that is what the definition of what the group label means).\n\nThanks for not only defeating your own argument, but also for supporting mine.", "856" ], [ "> Consolidating power\n\nLike wanting to give more power to the government and less power to the states?\n\n > invalidating elections\n\nLike the Democrats tried to do, actively working to undo the results of the 2016 election?\n\n > removing checks against power\n\nLike mobilizing the Supreme Court to pass policy that the Senate couldn't pass on their own?\n\n > removing checks against power like the media\n\nThe press is just as free today as it was before <PERSON> was elected.\n\n > These are all things the Democrats have done and also are the definition of Fascism.\n\nFTFY", "112" ], [ "He did condemn \"the <PERSON> killing\"...\n\n > I want to express our nation’s deepest condolences and most heartfelt sympathies to the family of <PERSON>. Terrible event. Terrible, terrible thing that happened. I’ve asked that the Department of Justice expedite the federal investigation into his death and do it immediately, do it as quickly as absolutely possible.\n\nIn another instance, he called it a \"grave tragedy\".\n\n > \"The death of <PERSON> in the streets of Minneapolis was a grave tragedy. It should never have happened. It has filled Americans all over the country with horror, anger, and grief.\"", "486" ], [ "That's not why whataboutism is.\n\nWhataboutism is when I would agree with the accusations made against <PERSON> and then either justify those accusations or deflect from them by pointing to someone else and basically saying \"they did it\".\n\nYou see, it is objectively obvious that that is not what I did. What I did was point out that what they're accusing <PERSON> of is not true and is actually more applicable to the Democrat party's platform. Thats not whataboutism; that's simply pointing out the projection, deflection, and hypocrisy.\n\nBut, whatever makes you feel better, go ahead and keep deflecting.", "16" ], [ "<PERSON> doesn't qualify any of the points made by the person I replied to. Therefore, the person I replies to is wrong to suggest <PERSON> is a fascist based on the points they presented.\n\nIf we are to expect someone to explain how *insert public figure* is not *everything they are not*, we would have no time to discuss anything else. Therefore, it is on the other person to support their accusation. I refuted the points they made and showed how the Democrats are more in line with those points than <PERSON>.\n\nYou're obviously not good at this.\n\nAnd for that, I'm out. Have a good day.", "856" ] ]
481
[ 4414, 15255, 23565, 5045, 19095, 9526, 2983, 10940, 4634, 10797, 23820, 13701, 20451, 16607, 4039, 3071, 25053, 23053, 14598, 408, 15004, 14085, 11580, 21674, 2810, 3197, 12796, 10237, 8534, 5976, 22830, 12413, 22325, 20526, 6227, 22201, 11372, 21742, 11496, 739, 3090, 24589, 5371, 15596, 5142, 16500, 16447, 8304, 1201, 5500, 634, 18819, 1496, 20628, 18118, 14655, 4231, 16442, 14896, 21581, 15259, 21470, 9409, 4479, 25066, 2444, 25521, 1428, 5713, 5054, 23605, 21590, 18778, 24113, 4953, 12744, 20316, 15890, 432, 18760, 8322, 19966, 7706, 5708, 3604, 3850, 13573, 24708, 5146, 11837, 16584, 5453, 19332, 9523, 11221, 17802, 22243, 18349, 24715, 2935, 7402, 21147, 24734, 4213, 20553, 13635, 2918, 23642, 10469, 15640, 12907, 2610, 24695, 16138, 22506, 24314, 1674, 2970, 16182, 24693, 3302, 24390, 21317, 6821, 1729, 1573, 1414, 17537, 16244, 7695, 17700, 12448, 8502, 2633, 1950, 25126, 5941, 3009, 3753, 2787, 8851, 6741, 5895, 17862, 6644, 16073, 9830, 1794, 21543, 3549, 19256, 12402, 3748, 9777, 6731, 12920, 13082, 23803, 1169, 3497, 22648, 13594, 5035, 16744, 13680, 633, 18175, 13107, 11133, 3321, 5993, 1007, 449, 10537, 16037, 10744, 19425, 9449, 15681, 23188, 8627, 9476, 17612, 11302, 13590, 6277, 20279, 14720, 13851, 12894, 16378, 5122, 24338, 18286, 6510, 1778, 18197, 8932, 16968, 9306, 23684, 10002, 22419, 2272, 25067, 13630, 6901, 25348, 2144, 17530, 22254, 9639, 12355, 20330, 10077, 25268, 19339, 4589, 15401, 17820, 18681, 15087, 20272, 8909, 23242, 8734, 13908, 2154, 23629, 19444, 18219, 8742, 17878, 22552, 10813, 24513, 18477, 8204, 12913, 5847, 13305, 13608, 12376, 4538, 2314, 1560, 18543, 11874, 21639, 14448, 11165, 10640, 2851, 18, 12926, 21989, 20145, 23571, 14948, 2403, 10245, 13342, 25016, 24759, 24942, 20647, 10585, 11692, 16745, 7238, 24141, 13162, 22945, 16786, 12691, 6026, 3501, 15611, 19165, 5432, 10867, 14513, 23280, 13913, 13094, 22725, 8540, 4573, 12205, 21625, 17545, 10236, 2907, 17221, 2249, 18658, 8400, 21440, 21659, 3247, 13536, 16468, 13464, 25024, 11845, 22031, 12072, 7451, 1037, 6361, 5602, 21922, 9097, 12887, 9264, 19526, 18826, 18914, 21375, 4278, 7461, 15535, 20028, 22476, 2642, 9717, 12984, 672, 9722, 22251, 7673, 16033, 24083, 11182, 12182, 5931, 13299, 4933, 19850, 10950, 1202, 21053, 5178, 15409, 7127, 3566, 18745, 8359, 16015, 16577, 16030, 22558, 1435, 159, 4163, 7197, 7909, 12601, 21033, 13017, 21258, 25307, 1192, 18620, 14087, 11821, 13014, 17687, 15158, 14904, 5326, 14786, 16806, 8384, 17831, 18379, 20072, 22207, 19429, 14949, 17037, 8325, 10495, 12555, 15671, 2644, 3697, 16519, 4, 12971, 1430, 16047, 23834, 9665, 24844, 22, 7058, 4097, 14346, 23293, 13857, 18031, 6728, 18562, 20970, 4168, 20858, 6038, 14482, 18400, 19411, 17406, 14295, 22964, 14121, 1478, 11810, 23146, 19611, 17728, 19259, 10921, 5572, 24129, 24694, 19131, 4699, 12877, 2351, 21730, 23685, 25287, 3951, 12591, 3344, 887, 19945, 4139, 3793, 15915, 13995, 19572, 1705, 15922, 6432, 50, 3815, 4992, 17421, 17935, 5961, 8993, 21213, 3568, 8281, 21044, 8459, 16427, 23291, 16750, 23054, 2136, 16705, 4197, 3310, 17352, 457, 13410, 25034, 13508, 22688, 21890, 23002, 20845, 12549, 12136, 19433, 19918, 3091, 40, 7536, 12604, 13804, 6314, 16475, 4940, 9102, 2420, 15320, 21553, 20650, 3406, 6473, 5588, 10483, 24208, 7505, 14483, 21741 ]
reddit_dump_-Mediocrates-
[ [ "And also she just got caught rigging another election when she had all sorts super ballots destroyed AFTER a subpoena was issued for them by the courts. ...... ..... and she didn’t even get in trouble... ..... .... she’s still in office.\n\n.\n\nMore proof that the elections in USA are a fucking scam and we are all getting fucking played..... like a bunch of ducking chumps!\n\n.\n\nFuck the dnc", "210" ], [ "<PERSON> is a faux progressive. She’s part of kabuki theatre. Bankers get caught and part of the Kabuki theatre is a 5 minute hot seat sizzle reel of <PERSON> talking aggressively at the banker.; this makes for great “optics” to appease the people. Then afterwards the banker rarely gets fined more than the fraud (if at all). Thus, the punishment is considered “cost of doing business.” He then resigns (though we are told “fired”... again for “optics”). Then said banker possibly becomes a lobbyist or retires rich as fuck. The new banker is promoted and the cycle repeats.", "499" ], [ "I wish <PERSON> and <PERSON> would actually read “the art of the deal.” This book outlines lots of <PERSON> strategies. And believe it or not, a lot of his actions in the presidency follows this book. \n\n.\n\nLuckily I’ve read this book and I’m gonna make a prediction on how this will all play out. \n\n1) <PERSON> loves being perceived as crazy and unpredictable so this is a stage he sets all the time. This is taken further in his promoting <PERSON> war hawk. So now everyone is scared and panicking \n\n.\n\n2) then <PERSON> loves to hurt people in their wallets to get them to bend. So he implements tons of sanctions. \n\n.\n\n3) after lots of posturing by Iran and USA and lots of skirmishes and false flag attacks... chicken little the sky is falling blah blah blah... Iran and <PERSON> are going to make a deal and war will be avoided. \n\n.\n\n4) <PERSON> is a lot less hawkish then establishment democrats AND establishment republicans. Don’t believe the chaos... it’s manufactured and intentional as outlined verbatim in “the art of the deal.”", "308" ], [ "Who gives a shit about anti-trump? Are you establishment dem making establishment talking points? Hmmmmmm\n\n.\n\n\nNot everything <PERSON> does is bad. Also many sanders supporters voted <PERSON> after dnc and <PERSON> fucked our guy. For example he’s absolutely less hawkish than both establishment dems and establishment republicans. Also some of his tariffs seem like they are working well. \n\n.\n\nI’ll vote <PERSON> for if he indicts <PERSON>.", "249" ], [ "No proof that <PERSON> cheated. <PERSON> probe is a complete joke to anyone who’s been paying attention. Only person got caught cheating is <PERSON> and her repulsive legion of skank neo-lib hags via primary rigging. Only person caught colluding with Russia is <PERSON> and her legion of skank neo-lib hags via uranium 1. I hope <PERSON> has the sand to lock these pieces of shit up!", "860" ], [ "Never gonna forget when <PERSON> told the progressive movement to “suck it up.” Fuck that ass-clown-uncle-Tom 6 ways till Sunday.\n\nDefinitely not uniting behind ANY establishment candidate period. And who the fuck cares about partisan politics? I’d vote for <PERSON> I’d vote for <PERSON> I’d vote for <PERSON> id vote <PERSON>, I’d vote <PERSON>, I’d vote <PERSON>, I’d vote <PERSON>, and I’d even vote <PERSON> if he indicts <PERSON> and her skeleton crew. I dont give a flying fuck about Democrat or republican ... I care only about the policies and the character of individual running for office.\n\n.\n\nThe majority of the country feels this way. There are more independents than democrats or republicans. Most people in this country are independent. It’s not even close. \n\n.\n\nFuck the dnc and fuck <PERSON>. Lock her up! Democrats unite? Suck my fucking dick.", "468" ], [ "Yea I know right? The book is stupid. Only a dumbass could have pulled off the greatest political upset in the history of the United States vs the most expensive campaign in the history of the USA by one the most prolific political families. Yea <PERSON> is soooooo dumb and his books are dumb. I mean only a dumbass can dismantle the entire multi billion dollar legacy media propaganda apparatus and permanent state/deep state with poop tweets.... Oh wait.... \n\n.\n\nGo ahead and keep under estimating <PERSON> and crying wolf and see how that works out for ya . I personally do not under estimate <PERSON> and I know he’s going to be hard to beat unless a <PERSON> type character runs against him.", "495" ], [ "Actually “go fund me” needs to be investigated. Corporate elites and corrupt politicians use “go fund me” to launder money and to avoid funding loopholes. True story. Massive corruption going on there. Sucks because “go fund me” is used for so many good things as well. :/ \n\n.\n\nBtw in case y’all didn’t know, “go fund me” #1 campaign is help with healthcare expenses. We need Medicare for all (just like every other modern nation on planet earth) immediately. USA has the most expensive healthcare by far and only ranked 35th-40th. We get Better outcomes and cheaper costs with Medicare for all. The best healthcare on planet earth are in countries with single payer. \n\n.\n\nGoogle search: countries with best healthcare \nGoogle search: countries with most cost effective healthcare.\n\n.\n\nUSA can’t even take care a of it’s own people. What a joke.", "36" ], [ "Original Iran deal has lots of flaws. I suggest you watch some independent news other than the <PERSON> smearing kind. So for example Iran has a lot of areas that inspectors weren’t allowed to go that contained nuclear testing.... allegedly. \n\n.\n\nAlso Iran dropped petro dollar \n\n.\n\nAdmittedly I don’t know much about the Iran deal but I’m not gonna claim the “sky is falling” until I see how this app plays out. Let’s see what happens. I think assuming <PERSON> is an asshole based on legacy media is dumb", "985" ], [ "Great point. I don’t even identify with right or left so those words I don’t pay attention to. \n\n.\n\nI was cross posting from a donald sub because I thought it was worthy here. They injected the left right narrative and I was too lazy to change it \n\n.\n\nObviously the point we really care about is censorship\n\n.\n\nI’ll be more careful next time \n\n.\n\nThank you\n\n.\n\nI’m usually in the donald subs these days looking for election fraud stuff but this one caught my eye", "728" ], [ "Dnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2016 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught\n\n.\n\n\n\nUndeniable proof of outcome changing election fraud \n\n.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections\n\n.\n\nDominion voting machines have been used in this country since 1990s (<PERSON> crime family was in the whitehouse) right after <PERSON> came out of nowhere and got over 20% of the vote. Since then an independent or third party never got over 2% (2.5 decades) ... hmmmmm \n\n.\n\nHow long have our elections actually been rigged?\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections", "103" ], [ "This is what a country that has nothing to hide and has fair, honest and transparent elections looks like. Democrats definitely didn’t steal an election. USA totally definitely doesn’t have fake elections \n\n.\n\n\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2016 and got caught.\n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught.\n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught.\n\n.\n\nUndeniable proof of outcome changing election fraud \n\n.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections", "210" ], [ "No lol. These treasonous con artists are getting more brazen because it’s getting harder and harder for them to keep their grip on power without taking such actions. Democrats are Full mask off to anyone barely paying attention . They are vile and repulsive \n\n.\n\n <PERSON> rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2016 and got caught.\n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught.\n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught.\n\n.\n\nUndeniable proof of outcome changing election fraud \n\n.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections", "210" ], [ "Settle down <PERSON>\n\n.\n\nIt’s time stamped to the best part just for you \n\n.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n\n\n.\n\nIt’s unedited footage of election fraud hearing. Who gives a flying fuck what icons are put on the sides of the screen \n\n.\n\nYou just exposing yourself as a shitlib shill when you can’t argue against the merits of unedited footage and instead slander “icons graphics”", "337" ], [ "And <PERSON> can’t accept that a country that rigs elections all over the world, also rigs its own elections\n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs bernie in 2016 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs bernie in 2020 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught\n\n.\n\n\n\nUndeniable proof of outcome changing election fraud \n\n.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections", "210" ], [ "“We don’t see things as they are, we see them as we are.” - <PERSON>\n\n.\n\nYou are projecting your own story onto the world. Who is paying you?\n\n.\n\nAnyways , \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs bernie in 2016 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs bernie in 2020 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught\n\n.\n\n\n\nUndeniable proof of outcome changing election fraud \n\n.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections", "210" ], [ "Says the shitlib who is offended to click on a video because of icon graphics \n\n.\n\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2016 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught\n\n.\n\n\n\nUndeniable proof of outcome changing election fraud \n\n.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections", "103" ], [ "Nah it’s literally the top data auditors in the country. If you bothered clicking and watching video you’d know\n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs bernie in 2016 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs bernie in 2020 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught\n\n.\n\n\n\nUndeniable proof of outcome changing election fraud \n\n.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections", "103" ], [ "Yes they do show the data. Literally. They even show every single calculation at every step on their twitter and website \n\n.\n\nHere watch it again.\n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2016 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught\n\n.\n\n\n\nUndeniable proof of outcome changing election fraud \n\n.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections", "103" ], [ "Yes they literally do ... literally. Go to the part that starts off with:\n\n.\n\n“In the spirit of transparency” \n\n.\n\nFocus you 17 year old crack skinny smooth brain mouth breathing shitlib shill... focus! \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs bernie in 2016 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs bernie in 2020 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught\n\n.\n\n\n\nUndeniable proof of outcome changing election fraud \n\n.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections", "103" ], [ "Video literally says all steps are shown. Links to website and media are there as well.\n\n.\n\nRight at the part where they say “in the spirit of transparency all calculations are shown at every step” \n\n.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n\n\nHere watch it again \n\n.\n\n<PERSON> rigged it vs bernie in 2016 and got caught \n\n.\n\n<PERSON> rigged it vs bernie in 2020 and got caught \n\n.\n\n<PERSON> rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections", "103" ], [ "Sure right here... just listen to it for a few minutes you can’t miss that part. It’s an entire section\n\n.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n\n\nHere watch it again \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2016 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections", "103" ], [ "Apparently you aren’t listening close enough. \n\n.\n\nLiterally the part that begins with :\n\n.\n\n“ In the spirit of transparency ....”\n\n.\n\nLiterally that part. Please rewatch again and this time listen for it \n\n.\n\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs bernie in 2016 and got caught \n\n.\n\n<PERSON> rigged it vs bernie in 2020 and got caught \n\n.\n\n<PERSON> rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections", "210" ], [ "Fair honest transparent elections affect progressives too. Election integrity is not a partisan issue. It’s an American citizen issue \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2016 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught \n\n.\n\nDnc rigged it vs <PERSON> in 2020 and got caught\n\n.\n\nHere is undeniable proof of outcome changing election fraud: \n\n.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\n\nUSA has fake elections", "210" ], [ "Just pop in any <PERSON> sub and take a look or ask. You are being insistent in asking me to predict the future which I can’t.\n\n.\n\nJust so you understand where I’m coming from: I was part of <PERSON>’s campaign in 2016 and 2020 and I saw the dnc rig it against him each time first hand. Ie: I was literally there and literally watched it happen. \n\n.\n\nWhen <PERSON> claimed rigged election in the exact same ways bernie was rigged and in many of the exact same counties bernie was rigged, I got hooked. I started following because finally someone with power is fighting our rigged elections. \n\n.\n\nThrough this experience I’m starting to understand the in fighting within the Republican Party . \n\n.\n\nSome of the mods of this sub encouraged me to post election fraud stuff, so I am. \n\n.\n\nThat’s it. \n\n.\n\nIf there’s a question you want answered just go to a <PERSON> sub make a post and ask . They are t assholes for the most part.\n\n.\n\nAll I know is that :\n\n1 - <PERSON> for sure had this election rigged against him in an outcome changing way. \n\n.\n\n2 - <PERSON> is fighting it in an impressive way \n\n.\n\n3 - his supporters will have an unbelievably large demonstration in dc on Jan 6th\n\n.\n\n4 - allegedly we ain’t seen shit yet. Way more damning evidence and proof to be released on jan6th . Which I find fascinating as /r/WOTBElectionIntegrity has some unbelievably damning evidence and proof of election fraud already. \n\n.\n\n5 - more and more senators and house members seem to be siding with <PERSON> every day", "939" ], [ "A lot of natural deodorants are not anti perspirants. It's the aluminum in chemical deodorants that prevents sweat. Also lots of studies show that sweating is good for you for a bunch of reasons. \n\nI've been trying lots of organic/natural deodorants and I found this one brand called \"Organic 101\" and I think they make the best natural deodorants hands down. Highly recommend you check them out. I buy mine on _URL_0_", "229" ], [ "I think \"Organic 101\" makes the best deodorants hands down. Usda certified organic and no baking soda. I've never gotten a rash and they have great customer service. I usually buy mine on _URL_0_. I've tried dozens of organic and natural deodorants and so far so I have a pretty good idea what's out there. Lots of scammy companies say they are natural or organic when they aren't.", "1015" ], [ "Baking soda can cause rashes and burns. I've tried literally dozens of organic deodorants and I highly recommend \"Organic 101\" brand . Lasts all day for me no rashes no stains ... usda certified .. just overall a great product as far as natural deodorants go. I cannot recommend them enough. Usually buy mine on _URL_0_", "383" ], [ "As far as natural deodorants go, I highly recommend Organic 101 brand. Hands down the best natural deodorant I have ever used. Usda certified, no baking soda, does not stain clothing , lasts all day for me. Usually get mine on _URL_0_\n\nLymph nodes and breast gland tissue all around the armpit area. Chemicals do permeate through your skin and can affect breast milk .", "1015" ], [ "<PERSON> of google says labor jobs are vanishing at an exponentially faster rate. At the same time it's never been easier to start your own business with free technologies such as Facebook, instagram , YouTube , email etc.....\n\nAmerican citizens need to become entrepreneurs.... United States creates more self made millionaires than any other country (china may have more millionaires but that's largely due to the child getting 2 inheritances) \n\nThere is always another genius in his/her moms basement programming the next \"whatever\" (such as Uber or Airbnb or snapchat etc) that's going to disrupt jobs in xyz vertical. \n\nChange can't be stopped and Americans live in the most service and products society in the world.\n\nThe jobber argument is a slippery slope because that forces special treatment of old industries that dont go away such as oil and coal etc... we need a more dynamic population that can be agile to the market. Entrepreneurship is where it's at. Free school and redefining your skill set to fit an effulgent and dynamic world is where its at. Single payer healthcare to relieve the massive stress of protecting your family so people can go out and start a business or invent something and pursue their dreams is where its at. \n\nWhy need an educated, self actualized, agile, confident population.... not a dumb, afraid, linear thinking population.", "28" ], [ "<PERSON> is spot on when he talks about free college and single payer healthcare. When jobs get out dated can always learn a new relevant skill. When you got single payer healthcare you no longer feel as much pressure to work that shitty job and can peruse your dreams. Being poor isn't as bad when u got healthcare. Being poor w no healthcare is unbelievably stressful.\n\nYou want to unleash the entrepreneur potential of the USA? Give us single payer so more people will take that risk.", "36" ], [ "I like both, lately though I'm all about that lemon haze scent. It's more subtle and fresh smelling. The cedarwood spice smells similar to original old spice which I like. If you like lemons I'd say go for the haze. At worst (I'm talking heavy workouts), organic 101 deodorants last a solid 10 hours for me. At best, light activity (office work with, walking around the city) it's all day effective. So for example right now I haven't showered yet, and I just took a whiff of my armpit and still smell the lemon haze from yesterday. Yea there is a hint of my bo too, but keep in mind this is from yesterday with no shower today. So I find that really impressive.\n\nYea it's a bit more expensive but it's usda certified organic so no shortcuts or labeling tricks to fool us and it's 3.25 oz where most deodorants are 2.5 oz so you do get more. \n\nThe redness in your pits is probably caused from the baking soda. I get that too so I specifically avoid natural deodorants with baking soda in them. \n\nThe thing is that our lymph-nodes are where our armpits are and women have all their breast tissue around the armpit area... now consider the constant friction, moisture, and heat in the armpit. Some of those chemicals are permeating through the skin for sure. Look at our breast cancer rates and/or our Alzheimer's rates in the USA? Something is going on here so I'm sold on natural deodorants. I don't mind spending an extra few bucks for one that's effective and usda certified. It's a premium product for sure.\n\nWhat I love about Organic 101 is that they don't take shortcuts. They do it the right way. I read somewhere that one of the founders was a usda organic chemist who worked directly under the president of the national Academy of Sciences. It didn't mean anything to me at the time, but after the first week, it was clear to me that this company brings a level of sophistication and understanding to their products that many \"natural\" brands don't. I know I sound like I'm selling this hard but that's because I've been trying various natural deodorants for a long time and I just think Organic 101 is super legit", "1015" ], [ "Download Skype. Hire Filipinos for 200-400 a month to do your work remotely. Put your products on a slew of different sites similar to Amazon. If u sell a service then sell it on service sites. The future is internet based income. 30k in USA is starvation wage. 30k on planet earth is 1%er so that Filipino is happy to work for 400 a month. The internet opened up the world. No longer are fortune 500s the only ones who can hire a labor force over seas. Anyone can do it", "460" ], [ "I just want to chime in and say that breast feeding moms (and all women especially), should consider using a USDA certified organic deodorant for a few reasons:\n\n1) lymph nodes, breast tissue, and major arteries are located under the armpit. Heat, friction, and moisture under the armpit create an environment that allow chemicals from the deodorant to permeate through the skin into the blood stream. This adversely affects breast milk, lymph nodes, breasts, and the brain as well. Consider increasing rates of breast cancer, lymphatic cancer, and alzeimers among other degenerative diseases.\n\n2) not all organic and natural products use the quality ingredients. \"Organic\" ingredients from china means nothing. \"Organic\" in the USA is a legal term. However, both are sold in the USA. On top of that many companies lie about the quality of their ingredients because they would rather just pay the fine. This is why you should only trust USDA certified organic products. \n\nI recommend and advocate the use of a USDA certified organic deodorant for these reasons (especially when you consider how fragile a developing baby is and how important it is to do everything right in those first few years of development). I can get more into it but I dont want to bore anyone. Over the years I've tried many \"natural\" deodorants so I know first hand how difficult it can be to find a good one. The best one by far is by a company called Organic 101. Their deodorants are hands down the best quality, and the most effective. I usually buy mine on _URL_0_. \n\nIf anyone wants to know more just ask and I would be glad to go into more detail.", "1015" ], [ "You realize that an election just got certified with <PERSON> levels of election fraud. This is going to become the new normal now that precedence was set.\n\n.\n\nI’m scared for my family and friends and what the future holds. \n\n.\n\nI’m in pure shock that this is happening. This is not good. I have zero faith that our government is legitimate and I’m not even a <PERSON> voter. When I look at <PERSON> I don’t see a president I see a vile criminal . I look down on <PERSON> I do not look up to him. He’s a legit criminal pretending to be a president. It’s creepy as fuck \n\n.\n\nPeople from all over the world know that the USA elections were massively rigged . The only people getting fooled are our own citizens. This is going to be really awkward from a foreign policy perspective. All these countries know we live in banana republic clown world. \n\n.\n\nThe series of events writes like a Star Wars sequel and the sith just took over again", "134" ], [ "You know the left is week as fuck right? Our thought leaders are such bitches. Such scared punks it’s embarrassing. \n\n.\n\nAt least <PERSON> supporters got balls of steel . \n\n.\n\nThey did the right thing today and it is unbelievably alarming to me that progressives did not pay attention or join in on this stop the steal thing vs a common enemy. Dnc rigs it vs us and vs republicans. This is clown world that we can’t unify on this one issue is not a good sign. \n\n.\n\nNot caring about election transparency because “<PERSON>” is like not caring for Medicare for all because “<PERSON> dore.” The hypocrisy are friction points where narcism and the ego hides. \n\n.\n\nDnc rigs it vs everybody. Progressives and republicans. Facepalms when progressives complain dnc rigging again. Maybe then they’d realize what an opportunity this one moment in time was. \n\n.\n\nAnd all these shitlib shills... they are selling out their country for some garbage money. What 20 per hour to post and strife people on Reddit who are pointing out real crimes? Vile bitches.", "468" ], [ "<PERSON> dad, <PERSON> was a murderous bloody gangster who took over Chicago after <PERSON> got taken down. Then <PERSON> won some elections (probably rigged) and got into government.\n\n.\n\nWhen considering our rigged fake elections elections, <PERSON> being a Chicago crime boss in politics, and <PERSON>’s suicided rate, it really makes me wonder if the <PERSON>’s are a political mafia crime family still in control today", "220" ], [ "They aren’t stunned. They were wondering what’s been taking usa citizens so long to fight back. \n\n.\n\nI was in a live twitch stream watching everything go down with hundreds of thousands of people from all over the world. \n\n.\n\nThe entire planet sees our fake elections and talks about it openly\n\n.\n\nUSA has fake elections and everybody knows it\n\n.\n\nHere is undeniable proof of USA fake elections \n\n.\n\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\nPlease help spread awareness", "210" ], [ "yes! please share far and wide\n\n.\n\nI also think Im being followed by bots because any election fraud post I make gets instantly downvoted regardless of how obscure the time I post or which sub Im in. \n\n\n. \n\n\nthis post will likely stay pegged at zero upvotes regardless how many people upvote it.", "263" ], [ "Grayzone is completely getting it wrong on election fraud. I love grayzone but on this one they are COMPLETELY incorrect. \n\n.\n\nIve been trying to get the word out. Everything I post on reddit that has to do with election fraud gets almost immediately brigaded with downvotes which suppresses the reach. \n\n.\n\nThe entire Georgia Election fraud hearing is DAMNING!!!!! but this timestamp clip is especially convincing. \n\n.\n\nCan you please help me get the word out? I do not have these sorts of connections. After <PERSON> was robbed in 2016 and 2020 I started obsessing over Fake Elections. I believe <PERSON> had this election stolen and Im not even a <PERSON> voter. \n\n.\n\nPlease help get the word out.", "103" ], [ "please hep spread far and wide. USA has fake elections. It's not even debatable anymore.\n\n.\n\nThe georgia election fraud hearing is over 5 hours long of DAMNING evidence... but this clip is undeniable PROOF.\n\n.\n\nThere is a difference between proof and evidence. Evidence is \"highly suggestive\" but \"proof\" is UNDENIABLE.\n\n.\n\nI watched every minute of every election fraud hearing and Georgia's is the most damning and Michigans was highly convincing as well.", "103" ], [ "Because it’s the only place to get his point of view. \n\n.\n\nI need to get many points of view before I can figure out a more accurate representation of the truth. \n\n.\n\nOverton window tactics and gas lighting tactics are just sophisticated lies through omission that change the narrative. \n\n.\n\nHearing and seeing more than 1 point of view of any incident is the common sense thing to do\n\n.\n\nThis is why deplatforming is unfair and extremely dangerous and is anti-american", "30" ], [ "I think <PERSON> has been treated very unfairly and he’s been vindicated enough times that I looked into it more. \n\n.\n\n<PERSON> was right about <PERSON> spying on him when the world mocked <PERSON>. \n\n.\n\n<PERSON> was right about no russian collusion for 4 years as the world mocked him on russiagate for 4 years. \n\n.\n\nSo yea... <PERSON> insisted he won, I took 20 minutes looking into it. I saw tons of damning evidence . I started digging ....\n\n.\n\nSo I started watching all the election fraud hearings. There is so much evidence and proof in these hearings it’s jaw dropping. Im sure this election was rigged. \n\n.\n\nAlso, I know dnc rigs elections because I’ve experienced dnc rigging first hand in 2016 and in 2020 vs bernie so there’s that too. Dnc has precedence of rigging elections \n\n.\n\n\nThen on top of that lots of creepy astroturfing from people like you and others only solidified it for me. You are creepy as fuck", "169" ], [ "#Just found out that USA gave 1 billion dollars to Leonardo Company very recently. What for??? \n\n.\n\nCould it be that our derp state paid Leonardo Company as a business transaction and/or reward for rigging our elections? <PERSON> is less of a war hawk than Neo Shitlibs such as <PERSON> (who lied us into the Iraq war and is pro every war),\n\n.\n\nHmmmmmm\n\n.\n\nPlease pass around this incredible breaking news and spread awareness of our rigged and fake elections far and wide. \n\n.\n\nElection integrity and transparency is not a partisan issue. Only corrupt people want corrupt elections.", "915" ], [ "where is your proof that it was not stolen?\n\n.\n\nThe DNC rigged it vs <PERSON> twice in 2016 and in 2020 and got caught each time. The DNC also got caught rigging it vs <PERSON> in 2020 right here:\n\n.\n\n[_URL_1_](_URL_0_)\n\n.\n\n#Are we to believe that the DNC ONLY rigs it in the primary and then totally definitely doesnt rig it in the general? \n\n.\n\nI dunno man. That seems preposterous to the average person. It's way more believable that the DNC rigs it in the primary AND the general (because it's their nature). \n\n.\n\nSo I do not understand how you can make such a statement without proof.", "210" ], [ "It sure is /u/martini-meow! \n\n.\n\n#WOW! Those are some fast links ya got there.\n\n.\n\nIsn’t that strange? \n\n.\n\n#What on earth has Leonardo Company ever done to earn 1 billion of our tax payer’s very hard earned healthcare money? \n\n.\n\nThough unsavory to consider, rigging a USA election sure does seem like a task worth a sum of 1 billion dont it? \n\n.\n\nHmmmmmm\n\n.\n\n# #CasePointProven", "915" ], [ "Nah. That was a different link. \n\n.\n\nThe one you are talking about is this one here which shows the Italian Job in action being exposed by one of the best data forensic teams in the USA: \n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\nThe link pinned on top of this sub (for maximum visibility) is an election integrity activist and investigator and a hero. She just broke the biggest story in our lifetime. \n\n.\n\n\n\n# #ItalianJob", "0" ], [ "#quick summary for those who are late to the party.\n\n.\n\nSo this is how it packs together: \n\n.\n\n#1\n\n\nThe hero who exposed the #ItalianJob to rig our elections via a 1 billion dollar bribe is <PERSON> (she’s also exposed election fraud in Broward County Florida in the past). Her interview is found here: \n\n.\n\n\n_URL_5_\n\n.\n\n.\n\n.\n\n#2\n\nEvidence of the Bribe disguised as a “military contract” can be found here:\n\n.\n\n\n_URL_3_\n\n\n.\n\n.\n\n.\n\n#3\n\nHere is the affidavit of the lawyer who prosecuted <PERSON>:\n\n\n.\n\n_URL_4_\n\n.\n\n.\n\n.\n\n\n#4\n\nThen here is the #ItalianJob being exposed from a data standpoint by one of the best data forensic teams in the USA. Notice how the data forensic teams findings line up PERFECTLY with <PERSON> findings and they dont even know each other; isn’t that interesting. This forensic analysis can be found here: \n\n.\n\n\n_URL_2_\n\n.\n\n.\n\n.\n\n#5\n\n<PERSON> directly implicated + great breakdown of events found here:\n\n_URL_1_\n\n.\n\n.\n\n.\n\n#6 \n\nOfficial press release of Nations In Action (<PERSON>) \n\n.\n\n.\n\n.\n\n\n\n_URL_0_\n\n\n\n\n# #ItalianJob\n\n# #StopTheSteal\n\n# #YesThisReallyHappenned", "0" ], [ "#quick summary for those who are late to the party.\n\n.\n\nSo this is how it packs together: \n\n.\n\n#1\n\nThe hero who exposed the #ItalianJob to rig our elections via a 1 billion dollar bribe is <PERSON> (she’s also exposed election fraud in Broward County Florida in the past). Her interview is found here: \n\n.\n\n\n_URL_4_\n\n.\n\n.\n\n.\n\n#2\n\nEvidence of the Bribe disguised as a “military contract” can be found here:\n\n.\n\n\n_URL_2_\n\n\n.\n\n.\n\n.\n\n#3\n\nHere is the affidavit of the Italian lawyer who prosecuted <PERSON> in Italy: \n\n\n.\n\n_URL_3_\n\n.\n\n.\n\n.\n\n#4\n\nThen here is the #ItalianJob being exposed from a data standpoint by one of the best data forensic teams in the USA. Notice how their findings line up PERFECTLY with <PERSON> findings and they dont even know each other; isn’t that interesting. This forensic analysis can be found here: \n\n.\n\n\n_URL_1_\n\n.\n\n.\n\n\n#5 \n\n<PERSON> directly involved + great breakdown found here:\n\n.\n\n_URL_5_\n\n.\n\n.\n\n.\n\n#6 \n\nOfficial press release of Nations In Action (<PERSON>) \n\n.\n\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.\n\n.\n\n.\n\n\nElection integrity is a non partisan issue. Being against election integrity and #StopTheSteal because “Trump” is no different than being against #ForceTheVote because “<PERSON> dore.” \n\n.\n\nTo think that Dnc ONLY rigs it in the primary against <PERSON> in 2016 and 2020 but then totally definitely doesn’t rig it in the general is absurd. It’s DNC’s nature to cheat and rig regardless of primary or general. Not to mention fair and transparent elections will be necessary for People’s Party (or progressive candidates). \n\n.\n\nPlease <PERSON> and/or <PERSON> - please consider covering this unbelievable yet true breaking news. USAs elections are rigged! We know who did it. We know what company he represents. We know what country did it. We know how much money involved. The story checks out; the forensic audit matches exactly what <PERSON> says and they do not know each other. Please help spread awareness! \n\n.\n\n.\n\n/r/nikomcsc please review and if it checks out, please consider covering this unbelievable and historic breaking news . \n\n/u/nikomcsc\n\n.\n\n\n# #ItalianJob\n\n# #StopTheSteal\n\n# #YesThisReallyHappenned", "210" ], [ "There are literally videos on YouTube of <PERSON> saying to literally withhold votes to prevent someone like <PERSON> from getting elected. She made these videos when she was getting elected. \n\n.\n\nWould be a shame if we were to flood her twitter with said videos showing her contradict herself.\n\n.\n\nPeople are dying in a pandemic and 70% of the country wants Medicare for all. It’s fiscally conservative option as well and we are in the middle of a recession.\n\n.\n\nWhat the fuck is her problem? She’s corrupt. \n\n.\n\n# #CovidCortez\n\n# #<PERSON> \n\n# #HoldTheVote", "557" ], [ "If <PERSON> is telling the truth then...\n\n.\n\nAs a citizen of this country, a long time <PERSON> supporter, a long time WotB poster, a long time progressive, an ex-libertarian, and someone who does not approve of many of <PERSON> policies....\n\n.\n\nI approve of <PERSON> in this moment, exposing election fraud to the world! \n\n.\n\nAnd I promise you that the mods in this sub are extremely concerned with election fraud (if it’s true). \n\n.\n\n\n# #StopTheSteal\n\n# #DrainTheSwamp", "249" ], [ "I actually disagree with many gun reforms. Over 92% of mass shootings are linked to opioids or opioid withdrawals. That’s never talked about. It needs to be looked into. It’s not fair to take away someone’s rights because of the actions of another. \n\n.\n\nWith all the election fraud that’s been going on, I’m 100% happy so many citizens have guns . Maybe if our government was less corrupt I’d feel differently .\n\n.\n\nMost violent crimes are crimes of poverty. Get rid of poverty, and violent crime goes way down\n\n.\n\nAt this moment I don’t believe guns are the issue", "701" ], [ "Just want to say that we are surrounded by hypocrites in both parties. \n\n.\n\nCan’t be “pro life” and be anti Medicare for all (which would save many lives and lower costs).\n\n.\n\nCan’t be “pro life” and be pro war \n\n.\n\nCan’t be “pro life” and be anti green new deal and/or not believe climate change is an issue. \n\n.\n\nCan’t be “pro life” and not give a shit about the homeless (who die from diseases of exposure).... giving homeless a home would save money by lowering medical costs and increasing property value. \n\n.\n\nCan’t be “pro life” and want to cut programs such as social security\n\n.\n\nCan’t be “pro life” and be anti living wage \n\n.\n\nI can go on and on and on.... the hypocrisy is so absurd it exposes the manipulation and manufactured consent. \n\n.\n\nCall yourself “pro life”? Ok... let’s have that conversation....", "817" ], [ "Dnc has operatives hired at Facebook and Twitter as employees in positions that make censorship decisions. This sounds conspiratorial but it’s 100% true. It’s a massive story that no one covers\n\n.\n\nAlso ... just saying... even if the bans come, is it really hard to use a vpn and just create another account that the platform thinks is from a different location?", "106" ], [ "Yea hi ratfuck shitlib,\n\n.\n\nYou aren’t fooling anyone in this sub\n\n.\n\nSo many of us in here are <PERSON> volunteers and/or hires from his campaign. We saw dnc rig elections right in front of our faces in 2016 and 2020. We even had an election fraud lawsuit vs the dnc. \n\n.\n\nSo let me guess... \n\n.\n\n\n the dnc ONLY rigs elections in the primaries via:\n\n1. mystical magical absentee ballots and \n\n2. secret source code black box voting machines \n\n.\n\nBut then the dnc totally definitely doesn’t rig elections in the general via: \n\n1. mystical magical absentee ballots and \n\n2. secret source code black box voting machines\n\n.\n\nCompletely absurd. The dnc cheats and everybody knows it. Not only that, but we’ve experienced it first hand many times in the exact same same counties that <PERSON> is contesting; just a coincidence I’m sure.... \n\n.\n\nYou are 100% wasting your time here with your lame ass beyond obvious shitty attempts to manufacture consent \n\n.\n\nLong story short: \n\nEven though we don’t agree with many of <PERSON> policies, WE WANT <PERSON> TO EXPOSE ELECTION FRAUD that we’ve known about for decades. \n\n\n.\n\n\nAlso, this sub has some of the most politically savvy people on the internet. We care about policies only. We see identity politics of any kind, as politically weaponized blackface. \n\n.\n\n<PERSON>: it’s perfectly OK that the “journalist” is trans. But bragging about it (as if it has anything to do with election fraud or good reporting) is a giant dog whistle that the “journalist” is a ratfuck shitlib. \n\n.\n\n\nPlease sit down you clown \n\n.\n\n# #StopTheSteal", "103" ], [ "<PERSON> is real life <PERSON> living out his final fantasy before the constraints of society come crashing down on him. \n\n.\n\nThe irony is not lost that he is one of the cruel architects of this draconian world that is about to eat him.\n\n.\n\nNerd talk is over... \n\n.\n\nI predict <PERSON> will be arresting anyone who is not supporting a transparent audit of the votes beginning late this week or early next week. It’s getting more and more uncomfortable on <PERSON>’s twitter . He’s been giving more than ample warning explaining what he’s going to do every step of the way and seems more than fair to me \n\n.\n\n# #StopTheSteal", "220" ], [ "She’s corrupted . Money and power too much for her to handle \n\n.\n\nThere are literally videos of her on YouTube talking about doing exactly what <PERSON> is talking about. Literally. Yet now, in our greatest hour of need and desperation she backs down. \n\n.\n\nWe are in a pandemic, an economic recession, and people are dying as a result due to lack of healthcare . Not only that, but Medicare for all is the fiscally conservative option and the humane option and the pro life option. 70% of the entire country wants it. \n\n.\n\nFor AOC to not back Medicare for all now is nothing short of corruption. It’s obvious! \n\n.\n\n# #CovidCortez \n\n# #PestilencePelosi \n\n# #HoldTheVote", "19" ], [ "You can’t be watching the actual election fraud hearings and then think that this election shouldn’t be fully audited. \n\n.\n\nEspecially after Dnc rigged it from bernie in 2016 and 2020\n\n.\n\nIf you are in fact watching the election hearings and you think <PERSON> won then I don’t know what to tell you. Just massively disagree with that sentiment. So much so that saying that the dnc didn’t rig the election comes across as crazy talk to me", "210" ], [ "1. This guy is creepy as fuck. Fuck no \n\n.\n\n\n2. What the legacy media calls “right” or “left” isn’t really right or left it’s makemups. The democrats aren’t left at all. In fact <PERSON> is to the left of <PERSON> and <PERSON> and <PERSON> on many issues and he’s a “republican” so does that mean he’s “right wing” because republican? The whole thing is fubar. \n\n.\n\n3. Fuck it. Color outside the lines. It’s more true that way anyways. I recommend avoiding the use of creepy people, simplifying the message, and avoid using bullshit left-right paradigms In the first place.\n\n.\n\nSo for example:\n\n.\n\n# #CancelCancelCulture\n\n.\n\nBoom done. No dumb as fuck makemups line in the sand “left” or “right” paradigm. Just freedom from weaponized juvenile social constraints. Cancel culture is some Lord of the Flies shit. Cancel all cancel culture.", "828" ], [ "Suppression nonsense . \n\n.\n\nIt really doesn’t matter. Water cooler talk... or better yet, people sitting at home passing around links from home to home .\n\n.\n\nOne great thing about this nonsense covid lockdown is that everyone has more free time to learn and investigate and learn some more on the issues. This lockdown is absolutely not helping legacy media suppress awareness. This covid lockdown is accelerating everyone’s learning on these issues \n\n.\n\nIts really a shame. Google YouTube wins no matter who is president and no matter which policies get passed. Why do they take an active role in suppression is beyond me. Imagine if google YouTube just let everything run without giving unfair bias. Our country would be advancing so much faster. \n\n.\n\nGovernment is holding back human potential.\n\n.\n\nSucks. \n\n.\n\nWe could be so much more if they just got out of our way and I don’t mean that in a menacing way.", "106" ], [ "<PERSON> wanted medicare for all in the 1960s and made ENTIRE speeches about it. It’s now 60 years later. Still don’t have it. 60 fucking years... how long are we going to be told to wait? this is so absurd. How are people falling for this obvious con job? I hate to say this but AOC is gone! Shes corrupted. It's obvious. \n\n.\n\nM4All appeals to many political ideologies:\n\nIt’s the fiscally conservative option\n\nIt’s the pro life option \n\nIt’s the humane option\n\nIt’s the freedom option \n\nOver 80% sheeple dem voters want it. \n\nOver 60% durrr-durrr repub voters want it. \n\nOver 70% of the entire country wants it \n\n.\n\nWe are in an economic depression. \n\nWe are in a pandemic. \n\n.\n\nThe time is now!\n\n.\n\nspineless sith apprentice <PERSON> ! \n\n<PERSON> (we see you bitch) and her master,\n\n<PERSON>\n\n\n\n.\n\n# #KabukiCortez\n# #PestilencePelosi \n\n.\n\n\n\nSith Rule of Two:\n\n“Two there should be; no more, no less. One to embody the power, the other to crave it. The Rule of Two.”", "66" ], [ "Election was rigged. We all know it. We feel your pain too.\n\n.\n\nDnc used many of the same tactics in the exact same counties that were used against bernie in 2016 and 2020\n\n.\n\n<PERSON> fighting this thing makes me like him more.\n\n.\n\nSCOTUS even threw out the case for the exact same reason our dnc lawsuit was thrown out. (<PERSON> lawyers are amazing lawyers and they were unsuccessful as well)\n\n.\n\nAlso, we have to wonder how many decades our elections have been rigged for. I know for a fact <PERSON> was rigged vs <PERSON> as well because I was there and saw it. How on earth can a TelePrompTer know the results of a vote before the vote has taken place? Yea exactly ....", "210" ], [ "I hope <PERSON> sees this through to the end. I don’t like many of <PERSON>’s policies but 100% agree with him here on this one. Many of us feel the same way. Wish him luck\n\n.\n\nOh and for the record. <PERSON> isn’t a socialist at all. He’s a ratfuck shitlib neo-liberal ... so <PERSON> is 100% wrong when he says <PERSON> is a socialist. <PERSON> is more like <PERSON> actually... Ie: a corporate socialist aka: fascist", "211" ], [ "highly recommend you check out the actual election fraud hearings (not to be confused with voter fraud that <PERSON> didnt find... that wasnt an accident... <PERSON>'s words \"voter fraud\" while <PERSON> going after \"election fraud\" extremely deliberate)\n\n & #x200B;\n\n. \n\n\nCan't be listening to any \"news\" org that pumped russiagate for 4 years. Any organization that did that (for 4 years) is blocked. Instantly out of my reality. Besides with today's technologies, we can just hear it right from the horse’s mouth. Dont even need reporters much anymore. So for example, do you want to listen to someone's spin of the election fraud hearing or do you want to just hear the entire election fraud hearing and decide for yourself? \n\n.\n\nArizona election fraud hearing was EXTREMELY fascinating. shit's better than game of thrones.\n\n.\n\nARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!", "103" ], [ "one country's patriot is another country's terrorist. <PERSON> is USA's greatest patriot and UK's greatest terrorist. American exceptionalism lacks awareness, compassion (that all men are created equal), perspective, and maturity.\n\n.\n\nWe are ruled by emotionally damaged children pretending to act like adults; and Im not necessarily talking about <PERSON>). They arent real leaders, it's embarrassing. \n\n\n. \n\n\nJust look at the \"leaders\" our system vomits up every 4 years. There's a problem with the system.", "227" ], [ "don't hold your breath. change comes from the bottom up. not from the top down. Ill be shocked (in a good way) if anything gets done. <PERSON> is weak as fuck on law and order. Easy to throw poor and desperate in prison. Much harder to throw the most powerful criminals in the country in prison. <PERSON> aint it.... maybe ill be proved wrong shall see.", "279" ], [ "DNC dances between the raindrops on legalities.\n\n.\n\n1) DNC is a registered not for profit - so they MUST follow their charter which includes fair elections in the primary.\n\n.\n\n2) DNC is Federally Funded - this also means that they MUST follow their charter which includes fair elections in the primary.\n\n.\n\n3) DNC argues in court that they are a private company that doesnt have to follow their charter.\n\n.\n\n4) soooo yea.... dont know whats up with their ability to argue that they dont have to follow their charter when they are Federally Funded AND a registered Not for Profit. In fact, most not for profits that get successfully sued, are ones that violate their own charters.\n\n.\n\n5) So this is very strange that the DNC can make these bogus arguments in court. Just seems massively corrupt to me. Just shows that the judges are corrupt too", "736" ], [ "Ahhh ... no shit. Well <PERSON> been putting out good content. I’m in! \n\n.\n \n*BUT* I still think <PERSON> is a total beta bitch when it comes to actually pressuring politicians with action reform. We see this now as he disagrees with <PERSON> on forcing M4all vote in a pandemic.... in a recession... 60 years after <PERSON> made speeches about M4all... and “incrementalists” (Ie: con artists), still have been unable to get the job done for 60 years... and getting a vote on M4all is controversial.... after 60 years.... can’t even get a vote... even though 70% of the country wants it. \n\n.\n\nSo we gotta get way more aggressive ... and sirota ain’t it. But his role as a journalist super legit.", "182" ], [ "Dont be mad at us for moving toward our Medicare for all agenda in the middle of a pandemic. \n\n.\n\nLet’s be honest here: You ratfuck shitlibs know what progressives are about; and we progressives know what you ratfuck shitlibs are about. No need for the charade.\n\n. \n\n\nMayyyyyybe you ratfuck shitlibs should take a long hard look in the mirror and be mad at <PERSON> for losing so many seats over the years; even with the DNC rigging elections against the people for decades. She’s lost so much (in spite of every advantage) that a handful of progressives are actually influential now. \n\n\n. \n\n\nIf <PERSON> didnt constantly lose, then 15 progressives pushing support for medicare for all wouldnt be enough to force anything. Don’t be mad at us for doing what little we can to push for Medicare for all. I suggest you ratfuck shitlibs look in the mirror for once. Your arrogance is stunning. \n\n.\n\n\n\n\nplease sit down you clown\n\n.\n\n# #PestilencePelosi\n\n# #CovidCortez\n\n# #HoldTheVote", "468" ], [ "How is this even controversial? \n\n.\n\n\nHow can anyone side with a government that constantly lies to us?\n\n.\n\n\nHow can anyone side with a government that holds us back as a people in order to keep current power structures? \n\n.\n\nHow can anyone side with a government that lies us into wars?\n\n.\n\nHow can anyone side with a government that constantly and continuously eats away at our freedoms? \n\n.\n\nHow can anyone not side with someone who exposes powerful entities wantonly violating our rights ?\n\n.\n\nThis is not controversial at all. \n\n.\n\n\n\nPlease Pardon <PERSON>\n\nPlease pardon <PERSON>", "30" ], [ "3 points \n\n.\n\n#1st point - there’s no such thing as glitches in computer code. That’s not how computer code works.\n\n.\n\nI do not need to prove <PERSON> integrity in this sub. For those who do not know he was the Technical Director at the NSA for 36 years and he is a military veteran and a whistleblower. So I will quote him on his comments on election fraud specifically: \n\n.\n\n \n“They call these kinds of things glitches. They’re not glitches. Software does exactly what you tell it to do. If you tell it to change something from one to another it does that. If you have a problem in your software we call it a bug and you have to get rid of the bug for it to perform properly. Whatever the bug is, it does it universally all of the time. So it messes up all of the time.” - <PERSON> \n\n.\n\nHere is the time stamped link. Please feel free to watch the whole interview on election fraud :\n\n.\n\n_URL_1_\n\n.\n\n#2nd point - votes came in faster than the machines could count them which means they were changed from within the code.\n\n.\n\nHere is Military Intelligence Officer Colonel <PERSON> (who had worked many years with Dominion). Again I highly recommend everyone listen to his entire testimony but I time stamped this part specifically to make this point \n\n.\n\nThe votes came in much faster than Doninion machines could possibly count them \n\n_URL_2_\n\n.\n\n#3rd point - how come Dominion refuses to testify and/or allow their machines to be legally audited in order to shut everyone up and restore trust in our elections? 47% of the entire country does not trust our elections. \n\n.\n\nA Rasmussen poll in November shows 47% of the country thinks the election was rigged and changed the outcome (including 30% democrats). That number is probably over 50% of the country by now with all the info being dumped. \n\n.\n\nDnc and Dominion is fighting tooth and nail to prevent machines from being audited. This just raises more suspicions and only makes Americans distrust the elections even more. \n\n.\n\nThe lack of transparency is a massive red flag that cannot be ignored! Why the secrecy on a machine that’s only supposed to ADD Votes??? The code either counts properly or it doesn’t. No need to be secret. \n\n.\n\nThis is the poll from November. It’s probably over 50% of the country by now. \n\n_URL_0_", "103" ], [ "The av rows show zeros in the 2nd document. You said that the Av columns in the first doc were the absentee ballots. \n\n.\n\nYes... I absolutely do have this much trouble reading charts. I need people like you to ELI5\n\n.\n\nSoooooo where are absentee numbers in the 2nd chart?\n\n.\n\nAnd yes! I absolutely do believe Colonel <PERSON> and <PERSON> on issues such as election fraud specifically. That’s why I link these 2 everywhere until their statements get debunked . These are the 2 people that triggered me to start taking trumps claims seriously \n\n.\n\nTruth does not need to hide in the shadows like Dominion and our non transparent elections in of which over 47% of the entire country thinks are rigged", "103" ], [ "There are 46 pages of zero absentee ballots . The data set is incomplete by a lot. \n\n.\n\n\n46/105 pages x100= 44% of the pages of that document is incomplete absentee ballot data ... this makes me question the validity of the entire document \n\n.\n\nFuckery is afoot and it’s obvious. \n\n.\n\nWho are you kidding? Not me. Not 47% of the country\n\n.\n\nThrow more passive aggressive insults though, that might work . Totally doesn’t come off as weird or defensive or anything and will totally win people over.", "103" ], [ "Literally 46 pages of 105 pages are literally missing data.\n\n.\n\nIf 46 pages out of 105 pages are incorrect, you don’t think that brings into question the validity of the remaining pages? Thats obvious .\n\n.\n\nFurthermore, the fact that you don’t find that suspicious either is very telling as well. Our election data available to us is incomplete. That’s a massive red flag. Where is the transparency????? Are you trying to prove my point or rebut it? Because so far you only prove my point; insufficient transparency \n\n.\n\nDo you think it’s ok that 46 out of 105 pages with incorrect data is perfectly acceptable in such a high stakes moment in history? \n\n.\n\nThe data you submitted is on shaky ground (is an under statement)\n\n.\n\nAfter all, the dnc has a history of rigging elections vs <PERSON> in 2016 and 2020. So dnc has a recent history of massive outcome changing Cheating.\n\n.\n\nDnc rigs elections and everybody knows it", "103" ], [ "These aren’t press conferences . They are literally election fraud hearings. Literally. \n\n.\n\nIf you care enough to know another narrative (than the one brought to you by the same entities that brought you russiagate for 4 years) then you can click on <PERSON>’s twitter and learn some shit.\n\n.\n\nI’m not gonna spoon feed anyone too lazy or too-far-gone to click on a twitter profile in order to learn the truth.\n\n.\n\nPlease sit down you clown", "988" ], [ "I’ll take 50% my comrade! \n\n.\n\nDnc totally rigs the primary via \n\n1 - Mystical magical absentee ballots and\n\n2 - black box secret source code vote flipping voting machines \n\n.\n\nThe dnc absolutely totally definitely doesn’t rig the general via \n\n1 - Mystical magical absentee ballots and\n\n2 - black box secret source code vote flipping voting machines\n\n.\n\nI mean why would DNC use many of the same rigging techniques in the exact same counties in the primary that <PERSON> is contesting in the general? That’s totally a coincidenceski I’m sureski \n\n.\n\n# #Totallyski", "103" ], [ "Use every situation to our advantage imo.\n\n.\n\nWhether <PERSON> just wants to win or doesn’t really care about election integrity ... those are assumptions. \n\n.\n\nSo let’s assume you are correct. If <PERSON> exposes massive election fraud motivated by narcism who gives a fuck. The important part is exposing the corruption. \n\n.\n\nIt’s it gets exposed as part of his narcissistic political wake... ok?.... and?....\n\n.\n\nIt’s still to our advantage \n\n.\n\nNever waste a crisis", "210" ], [ "Statistic anomalies:\n\n\"Receiving 75% or more votes for one candidate in a precinct is abnormal... Receiving over 90% is a marker for fraud.... In Fulton County alone, we can see that over 150 precincts voted 90% or more for <PERSON>.\"\n\n.\n\nALSO:\n\nPROOF of Vote Switching with ZERO human contact: over 12,000 votes switched from trump to biden in 3 counties alone. It's VERY important to understand the DIFFERENCE between PROOF and EVIDENCE. Evidence shows \"strong likelihood\" and PROOF is CONCRETE TRUTH THAT IS UNDENIABLE. What is shown in this clip is PROOF.\n\n.\n\nALSO:\n\nPROOF: of deleting over 30,000 votes from <PERSON>\n\n.\n\n\"The burden of proof is on the system to prove our elections were fair and not the people.\"\n\n.\n\nALSO NOTE:\n\nThe entire 5 hour Georgia election fraud hearing is unbelievably damning in and of itself. This time stamp part in this post is but 1 piece of 5 hours of nonstop election fraud evidence and proof.\n\n.\n\nIf you continue watching all the way to the end, you can see and hear the senate members clearly state the parts that were most convincing to them.", "103" ], [ "Literally the president of the United States literally communicating directly to the people every day . <PERSON> communicates more with the people than any other president ever; more than the fire side chats. \n\n.\n\nVs.\n\n.\n\nLegacy media pushing russiagate for 4 years after it was debunked about 2 weeks after it dropped. Hmmmmmmm I wonder who is more believable. You are choosing to believe legacy media that just lied to us for 4 years straight. Durrrrrrrrrr .... who are you kidding??\n\n.\n\nYou sound so full of shit, that I don’t even need to respond to you. Not even dumb people will fall for your line of bullshit.\n\n.\n\nPlease sit down you clown\n\n.\n\nOrrrrr \n\n.\n\nContinue to respond and help this thread go sticky for more exposure . Sucks don’t it? \n\n.\n\nYou are being fuckboy, and everybody can see it. \n\n.\n\nPlease stop", "906" ], [ "That’s not how the overwhelming majority of people see it. Have you actually watched any of the election fraud hearings?\n\n.\n\nThe Michigan one is especially fascinating. The Arizona one is also great. Today is Nevada and I assure you that one will be especially good.\n\n.\n\nTo think that the dnc can cheat bernie in 2016 and in 2020 and get caught both times. Then all of a sudden the dnc plays its cards straight in the general is absurd", "103" ], [ "You are misinformed \n\n.\n\nMilitary intelligence officer Colonel <PERSON> is a cyber security expert and had worked with black box voting machine companies directly (including Dominion) and he has spent hours and hours explaining how they rig elections in the election fraud hearings. \n\n.\n\nHis testimonies are so thorough that even establishment dem Shitlibs cant poke holes in it. It’s fascinating. Keep in mind that colonel is 1 rank below general . So it’s pretty damn highly ranked officer. \n\n.\n\nHighly highly highly recommend everybody (including you) go to <PERSON>’s twitter and watch these election hearings. The legacy media, that lied to us for 4 years about russiagate, is blacking this out and mocking it. They are already talking about prison sentences and locking these people up for the rest of their lives. Shit is going down\n\n. \n\nArizona’s was amazing \n\nMichigan was even more jaw dropping. \n\n\nToday Nevada will be even more spectacular I suspect", "298" ], [ "I said this before and Ill say it again:\n\n<PERSON> exposing election fraud paves the way for progressive candidates in the future. How many anomalies did <PERSON> have to beat <PERSON>. I mean <PERSON> won every single state that historically won the primary yet somehow <PERSON> still won? DNC did the same shit to <PERSON> that they did to <PERSON>. How many decades has the DNC been rigging our elections both in the primary and in the general? Hundreds of millions of lives suffering constantly every day for decades. So much pain and suffering. No amount of money can compensate this. Im so fucking filled with rage!\n\n.\n\n#THIS IS TREASON OF THE HIGHEST ORDER.\n\n.\n\ngod damnit I do not believe in the death penalty but part of me would be completely ok with it in this instance. \n\n.\n\nI 100% fully support <PERSON> on this election fraud issue. I may not agree with much of his politics but I agree with this. AND BESIDES, <PERSON> seems to be outlefting democrats a lot lately. Makes me wonder what he would do if #ForceTheVote gets a vote ... hmmmmmm", "210" ], [ "<PERSON> exposing election fraud PAVES THE WAY FOR PROGRESSIVES IN THE FUTURE! \n\n\n. \n\n\nHow many DECADES have progressives had their shit rigged against them? \n\n\n. \n\n\nEven <PERSON> says we need to \"over win\" to win; which literally means rigged elections. Then he mocks trumps election fraud claims. Im sitting here like... BITCH! You are so fucking blind <PERSON>! That kid needs to get a fuckin clue. ALL those progressive indy media types WHIFFED HARD on this one. \n\n\n. \n\n\nanyways.... I hope this shit steamrolls from here on out HARD. I hope all yall passing this shit around. If Georgia is this rigged then ALL THE OTHER STATES THAT <PERSON> talks about must be looked into as well!", "210" ], [ "Yea well... DEMS just got caught and they need to be tried for TREASON! \n\n.\n\nIm so fucking pissed. Im so full of rage! Im having serious moral dilemmas. I dont believe in death penalty... but on this one... god damnit.... Im on the fence. \n\n.\n\nHow many hundreds of millions of people have been suffering for DECADES due to our RIGGED ELECTIONS overriding the will of the people. HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF LIVES WOULD HAVE BEEN SO MUCH BETTER! \n\n.\n\nI GUARANTEE we wouldnt have engaged in so many FAKE WARS ! THE HISTORY OF THE PLANET WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT. YOUR FAMILIES' HISTORY WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT. GENERATIONS OF RIGGED FUCKING ELECTIONS! EVERYTHING WAS A FUCKING LIE! \n\n.\n\nDECADES OF RIGGED ELECTIONS MADE THE WHOLE PLANET SUFFER when you consider the size of our military and how aggressive these CORRUPT PIECES OF SHIT ARE!\n\n.\n\nI thought it was so weird these randos brigading our sub arguing until they were blue in the face for hours... its weird and felt off. Makes sense now. I would have hired people to do the same thing if I had to keep such a devastating secret.\n\n.\n\nthe motherload of all conspiracies is true. Secret groups rigging our elections and controlling the world with our \"muscular military\"\n\n.\n\n#NOBODY KNOWS WHO CONTROLS DOMINION!", "210" ] ]
72
[ 4033, 16808, 1747, 11606, 20323, 21655, 23288, 18030, 2279, 8807, 559, 11340, 7472, 3643, 3965, 4371, 17034, 14444, 23098, 18318, 14397, 6421, 1473, 22322, 17608, 9358, 18046, 16202, 8883, 19064, 5060, 24281, 5334, 25111, 8695, 7569, 1921, 21383, 22834, 24928, 9996, 10500, 13419, 11826, 3510, 24487, 11419, 24212, 23151, 2359, 22443, 17508, 4796, 6232, 18042, 11448, 22148, 15805, 3381, 9644, 20347, 2047, 9064, 5680, 2500, 20301, 19191, 15779, 22305, 12293, 12749, 10173, 21746, 10190, 3961, 778, 10070, 14466, 494, 6979, 11331, 25409, 5989, 9066, 3340, 4942, 5700, 3733, 4175, 6313, 24460, 10930, 10664, 22774, 12035, 22827, 362, 3529, 14595, 9521, 12916, 13873, 1841, 14098, 2680, 410, 17906, 14895, 11046, 5387, 19035, 21462, 18828, 6768, 20390, 925, 7622, 14248, 24781, 20786, 8216, 21390, 15150, 2765, 14695, 11415, 24662, 11459, 7000, 24026, 19710, 21781, 17321, 3325, 3136, 13016, 14373, 7998, 242, 16957, 22635, 24143, 23842, 7799, 10718, 18043, 2622, 3607, 4996, 17025, 6122, 12309, 15663, 7616, 6212, 1871, 1709, 19997, 16825, 16988, 21203, 9758, 5234, 22925, 24376, 3803, 1131, 14910, 16040, 11626, 727, 12160, 7145, 2204, 11202, 7684, 21161, 2529, 21136, 25143, 9308, 5587, 16907, 16728, 2062, 20664, 17231, 14191, 9846, 16148, 18425, 9216, 18730, 7587, 1198, 3277, 4912, 5331, 17517, 1457, 22727, 2142, 7265, 5127, 4153, 17577, 1016, 10624, 4359, 17944, 420, 2904, 1017, 2764, 17334, 9399, 14273, 10978, 1558, 5591, 15936, 3626, 7132, 824, 14284, 17333, 5348, 19325, 6146, 3039, 9033, 23663, 2560, 8018, 16951, 7981, 21396, 5458, 5125, 10934, 1470, 19011, 4107, 11515, 15221, 20427, 2691, 3374, 18931, 22180, 17397, 9833, 4305, 13308, 3126, 23226, 4526, 2354, 16193, 3675, 22721, 14229, 22644, 19326, 12768, 10083, 3076, 19492, 2914, 7860, 24620, 14653, 14678, 3365, 24575, 20671, 9058, 17544, 23530, 16248, 22904, 12023, 14494, 21425, 19299, 15894, 2688, 14434, 14296, 290, 21601, 14710, 14139, 10622, 15251, 1516, 24722, 6, 9119, 19107, 8830, 2829, 2581, 17369, 6071, 22321, 1650, 8849, 25419, 16485, 4128, 1878, 6276, 10582, 23864, 22254, 21106, 9842, 5816, 24522, 24552, 1088, 1685, 21768, 12223, 4498, 3215, 10763, 18464, 19456, 19074, 9453, 15510, 10736, 16436, 17668, 7692, 19661, 21401, 3710, 13477, 1619, 14393, 5279, 16161, 15869, 3400, 10454, 23010, 16587, 23173, 5366, 877, 6095, 14618, 8889, 105, 11073, 24910, 12785, 24964, 22564, 2221, 10760, 24050, 2928, 8287, 7778, 5189, 2309, 8684, 19603, 281, 1107, 7729, 1292, 10844, 9349, 15911, 1933, 24771, 13147, 24629, 24156, 19232, 23975, 5953, 17512, 23888, 7548, 4853, 18565, 4897, 21482, 7719, 12012, 228, 557, 21324, 17569, 9350, 3754, 2524, 23125, 11356, 8, 25033, 20161, 15119, 11698, 23034, 22537, 20077, 20932, 4638, 2631, 13987, 12846, 4383, 10152, 5703, 24276, 24336, 16, 17836, 8961, 22278, 22873, 12606, 17466, 15720, 22326, 24349, 14929, 15261, 20575, 4701, 25339, 9563, 9006, 14426, 12409, 17788, 1555, 4234, 1368, 2604, 19674, 12550, 11974, 17130, 23940, 8634, 12119, 17017, 23840, 8339, 3505, 16522, 1760, 217, 2980, 796, 10099, 2078, 20058, 12447, 834, 21782, 3263, 13402, 17625, 378, 11238, 5335, 18853, 14431, 4241, 25479, 20041, 17673, 17306, 10156, 2779, 3598, 2469, 4845, 11886, 19733, 3264, 21384, 22192, 2030, 24377, 20396, 7577, 17237, 11641, 6261 ]
reddit_dump_-Mez-
[ [ "So the datamined background implies that I'm in bed with my opponent and shows off a couple of panties? <PERSON> or not, that feels pretty odd and seems like its trying a little too hard, but whatever. Not a deal breaker. Just slightly annoying in public.\n\nI like the idea of background changes more than boards. The boards are cool, but as mentioned they stand out a bit too much and don't quite blend in with the current background style. I did start to like them more as I was playing yesterday though. Still looking forward to seeing what all gets changed with the big overhaul of the board.", "887" ], [ "Not saying they should remove a row, but I have yet to see a good argument against it that wasn't basically just that it would change the gameplay or that this is what its always been so it should stay that way.\n\nIn fact, the most intriguing thing I've seen mentioned multiple times (and already in this thread too) is that the siege row could act more as a hand row. With more hand to hand, hand to board, or board to hand interactions. That sounds palatable, but its hard to say without knowing the full picture of what they want to do yet. \n\nBasically, I think its an interesting idea, and I hope they give or gave it a good amount of though regardless of what they actually do in the end. It may or may not be the right choice, but its an interesting one.", "880" ], [ "If I'm understanding your suggestion correctly that would be pretty bad from a human computer interaction standpoint. UI in cases that are mimicking a real life situation (like playing cards) tries to mimic what the brain would expect to experience. Our hand would be held in our hands in real life, so our brain expects to see it below the board and above the board. Most people are also very used to reading left to right which a single row on the bottom does nicely. A vertical row of 1 or even two columns would feel more difficult to parse over a second or two.\n\nThere are also already design elements that exist in those spaces. They just don't appear all of the time, and you probably wouldn't want to have them cover the hand. If you're looking at a card your opponent played on the board or in their past turns, you'll likely want to see your cards in hand at the same time. Since you are likely looking at it to think about your next move. If they overlapped it would be a lot of flipping back and forth.", "286" ], [ "It's going to be a day 1 purchase for me just because it is a main series Pokemon game, but I mainly just want to see design improvements over feature improvements. I don't need new features. I don't care if I can pet my Pokemon, if they follow me, if I can take pictures with them, or if we visit every region that has existed if the world is as simple and boring as it has been these last two generations.\n\nThey can throw in all the extra stuff they want, but I want the main game to have areas that are actually interesting to explore for more than 2 minutes. I need an actual victory road equivalent that feels like an accomplishment. I need dungeons/bases/lengthy routes. The level design needs to step it up again. Just because we're in 3D now doesn't mean that a cave which is just one room with one push puzzle is acceptable and fun. Gen 7 carried itself on good Pokemon designs, interesting bosses, and a nice atmosphere, but I don't know if that alone is going to be enough for me again.", "935" ], [ "This is a result of Gen 1 balance problems. Water/Dragon would be too strong in that generation. The only dragon move in Gen 1 does a set amount of damage, so there would be no way to effectively attack a Water/Dragon. And Dragon types were intended to be extremely rare. Now Mega Gyarados, yeah they missed the opportunity there. Also, the devil's advocate point would be that they don't have to follow a myth down to every little detail just because they grabbed some inspiration from it.", "254" ], [ "Can't speak for the current Pokemon team or the ones who have had the chance in the past, but they probably don't see a need to. The theme still comes across as intended, and Fairy was a new type being introduced which caused retroactive updates. They probably don't really care if Gyarados has a typing that was already around when it was created. Choosing Dark for its Mega just further shows that they don't feel it needs to be a dragon to fulfill their original vision.", "935" ], [ "I'm sticking around because I play games that I enjoy and I still enjoy Gwent. I don't try to force myself to play every day, every week, or even every season, so meta's don't really get stale to me. If I lose interest I just come back in a few weeks after my interest is back. If I got bored with games that aren't releasing significant content every month I wouldn't be a Diablo 3 player. I don't look at one game to be my sole source of dynamic and interesting online gaming entertainment all year.", "20" ], [ "They often show up with some kind of plot. Usually to steal Pokemon or win a competition with a prize that the main characters are also participating in. I'm not sure how it has been in the middle seasons, but Sun and Moon has given them a couple episodes with more focus on what they are doing when they aren't messing with <PERSON>. They have at least one episode where they clash with some Team Skull members, and some others where they bond with their Pokemon more than they try to steal anything.", "935" ], [ "If you're planning on playing when homecoming releases the best thing to do that we know of at the moment is open during a premium weekend now. Cards will mill for full value at homecoming's release, so even if you get all duplicates you can still mill everything you got at the time of homecoming's release and just craft every new card you want with premiums. Or you could wait for a premium weekend after homecoming releases if they ever have one again.", "471" ], [ "I take it this is just for the story? Seems good enough to me with the right amount of grinding. Meganium is probably the weaker starter to choose with what you'll be up against in game, but if its a preference choice then it'll still work out. \n\nI'd recommend not planning out specific movesets unless you've looked at all of these and seen that the TM's are available within reason or the Pokemon learns it by level. Gen 2 is notoriously bad about the TM's they give you before Kanto, and early gen Pokemon games generally had garbage moves from leveling up. I haven't checked or remember each of these Pokemon's movesets, but some of this looks like stuff you won't have full access to until you're basically finishing the game.\n\nWhat are you planning on doing for HMs? I only see fly and surf and you're going to need more than that to move around the world. Cut in particular is one that sucks to have, but is a huge convenience factor given how many cutable trees are around. The rest like whirlpool, flash, and waterfall you can probably just swap in as you need it, but you still need to have a plan on what you will be swapping in and who you will be willing to swap out.", "935" ], [ "I used Cat gear in my base playthrough. Went with a quen/igni and fast attacking style. I ended up switching to Ursine for the looks in new game + though. Manticore looks are also pretty good as a callback and the combo's you can do with it are great, but its less available than the others. Wolf looks cool and gets points for being <PERSON>'s school, but it comes at an awkward time in the game. The final stage of wolf clips pretty badly with <PERSON>'s model from what I remember as well. Griffin is great for signs and probably would have been my choice for my original playthrough, but I just wasn't a fan of its colors and general shape. Sometimes you just have to fashion over function.\n\nBasically, all are good at something different. None of them are a bad choice. Pick whichever one compliments the kind of Geralt you want to play and compliments the aspects of combat that you enjoy most.", "330" ], [ "> I agree with your point. However, I dont see how FL4K Torgue Shotgun / crit build damage could be reached, even at 10% of its potential, by a Zane with his current kit. His skill tree just dont allow it. I know there should be differenciations between VH, but here the difference in DPS potential is so huge that you feel literally useless as a Zane Player. Because utility is cool yeah, but if you can kill all your foes before you get hit, it is even better right ? \n > \n > They either need to nerf others or buff him & buff general endgame content which is a joke for FL4K/Moze since Day 1.\n\nAgreed and that's why I called out those characters in my first paragraph since they trivialize the game to the point where their other builds are ignored and in some cases other characters feel shafted. I also mentioned that I don't believe those setups are going to exist in their current form forever, and I still believe that unless gearbox just really doesn't care if certain people can kill every boss in a few seconds and are never going to use Fl4ks pets or Moze's mech because of the power imbalance.", "884" ], [ "Damage-wise the clear winner right now is Fade Away combo'd with shotguns, high damage pistols, etc. Pick up Guerillas in the Mist to make all shots fired critical hits for 8 seconds while you're invisible, and then pickup the skill that returns bullets into your magazine when you crit. You can build it out from there however you want, but most people are focusing on legendary shotguns, tediore shotguns, and jakobs shotguns. Pick up the critical damage skills along with this and anything else you can afford that buffs Fl4k. His pets aren't performing very well right now in comparison to this build, so most people just take the jabber since it happens to be in the Stalker tree anyway.\n\nLeveling is a little different since you really don't need that much damage to level and the FA build is more single target focused. You can use anything you want to level really. If you use the FA build I'd run with Jakobs shotguns since they ricochet bullets into groups and they are available from the start of the game.", "675" ], [ "<PERSON> is great at clearing groups of enemies. That doesn't really kick in until you get done with the early game. He does lack a game-breaking build that he can use to dps down bosses and everything under the sun a few seconds though.\n\nSwapping is a personal preference based on what you have fun with. It may be worth switching if it means you'll get more fun out of your playthrough based on what <PERSON> and other characters provide.", "456" ], [ "Just 6 pros and 6 cons that come to my mind first. The cons are nit picky things as I am really enjoying the game, but they have at one point or another negatively impacted my enjoyment.\n\nPros:\n\n* Gameplay feels great\n* Classes are all pretty fun and I like the character designs\n* Environments look nice\n* The loot loop has been nice so far. Hasn't felt like a chore but also haven't felt like I have exactly what I want with nothing to work towards.\n* Easy to get into a game with friends\n* Great music\n\nCons:\n\n* Some of the UI is better but some of it is pretty bad. The inventory management is severely lacking. The shop and backback menus seem like they went for style over substance. Its hard to quickly hop into your inventory or a shop and immediately parse and compare information. Every time my backpack is full I feel a sense of dread at having to look through everything. It needs to be much cleaner and simpler to look through.\n* Some of the humor lands well, but some of it makes you feel like its wasting your time while you're waiting for them to get to the punchline so that you can continue doing a thing.\n* Some of the mission structure feels really dated. For example, at one point they have you run back and forth between a bridge and a cargo bay more than feels necessary just to pick up an item, talk to a person, plug in an item, talk to another person, hit a button, and then go talk to <PERSON> who went down to the cargo to wait for you. Like, really, you told me hit a button on the bridge just to then tell me go back to the place where I just was before you had me run back up here to talk to <PERSON> who didn't say anything other than \"hit the button now\"? It made sense when it was acting as a tour for the different areas of the small map, but once they had shown you each zone that should have been the end of it. I was basically manning the thing by myself when we have a whole crew of capable people currently standing by the button that needs pressed and the ability to talk over long ranges to let those people know they can push the button now.\n* The balance between builds and classes is kind of out of whack, but that's to be expected since its new. Its unfortunate that some classes are basically ignoring things that make them unique because one thing is the clear best option in their trees. Its extremely disappointing to me that Fl4ks best option right now is just to pretend that they're Zer0 with a monkey friend to talk to. And it almost feels like they had multiple people making gear/skills for <PERSON> who had no consensus on where to direct him. He has multiple contradictory skills and gear bonuses that don't make much sense to have on one character.\n* Can't skip the opening cut scene and it is rather long when making a second character.\n* Technical issues some people are having on all platforms", "14" ], [ "Treasure hunters (vault hunters) are lured to Pandora by the rumors of a hidden vault of treasure and riches. Pandora is a desolate wasteland where convicts, travelers, etc. have at one point or another been deserted there. Vault hunters are known by the locals for chasing something that probably doesn't exist in an extremely hostile environment and most everybody gives up or dies. The main characters of the first game come to hunt the vault, fight bandits, get mixed up with a squad of Atlus soldiers who are also hunting the vault, and eventually they succeed. The Atlus leader manages to open the vault as you arrive, and instead of power, riches, fame, etc. she is rewarded with an otherworldly creature that was imprisoned in the vault. It kills her, you kill it, and thats the end of the main mission.\n\nThe dlc involves the Crimson Raiders (the atlus soldiers) sending more people to Pandora but you kill them too and take their mass armory full of more weapons than you can imagine, and there was a dlc where the claptrap robots rose up in rebellion because Hyperion reprogrammed claptrap to assassinate/kill you. You had to kill the robots and their leader which basically wiped out all but one claptrap unit. There was also a zombie and mad moxxi dlc, but it really wasn't heavily tied to the main story in a way that carries over into 2, so I'm not going to explain it.", "326" ], [ "Probably <PERSON>. She's strong enough that she doesn't even really need her action skill for anything. <PERSON> would be the only one I'd consider to contest her considering his Fade Away build, but he's definitely more of a single target/boss killer whereas <PERSON> can very effectively clear mobs and bosses.\n\nAt this point with what we know right now its probably: <PERSON>/Fl4k then <PERSON> then <PERSON>. Unless someone experiments with an unknown combo or finds some items that open things up more, thats looking like the current status of things.", "456" ], [ "Yeah thats partially why I was hesitating to definitively list her above him. They've both got a lot of survivability and ability to do just about anything you'd want in game depending on what guns are used. If anything becomes significant enough to AoE kill <PERSON> while he's cloaked he might fall behind <PERSON> considering her survivability is insane, but for now <PERSON> is fine surviving by not being targeted since nothing like that seems to exist.", "354" ], [ "An example of the clashing synergies involve <PERSON> not knowing whether he wants full shields or empty shields. The first tier on the shield tree would imply that he wants high capacity shields and shield regen, but the next tier has a skill that rewards you for having empty shields or no shields. Theres class mods that also reward you for having empty shields I believe. There are more examples but that's probably the easiest to point out since if you want to use the skill that gives you benefits for having no shield, you have to waste 5 points in a shield boosting skill to get to it.\n\nSome could argue that it's so he is versatile and can build multiple ways. But when opposing skills like this are in the same tree it hurts him more than it helps compared to the other hunters that whose skills synergize without much fault.", "991" ], [ "I'd agree with that about the mod, but the whole point is the mod makes sense to combo with one particular skill in the shield tree. The skill I'm talking about however is on the second tier of the shield tree. Rise to the occaision I believe its called? It's a skill based on <PERSON> having empty shield to gain health regen, and yet you are forced to take 5 points in the tree to get it and the only skills on the first tier boost shield capacity, regen rate, or gives him a bonus based on how full his shield is in the opposite way. It's the complete opposite of what you would want if you wanted to play with rise to the occaision. \n\nIt's a skill that should pair excellently with that mod. Except it doesnt because you either spend 10 points to get it and only get 5 points of value or ignore the skill that should be helpful to you entirely. It's not game breaking by any means, but when people say his trees seem poorly thought out in some ways compared to other classes this is a good example of why.", "163" ], [ "In what scenario would you ever pick rise to the occaision in the under cover tree then? Theres no point in having it unless you intend to be running around with as little shield as possible. That skill doesnt compliment the aim of the rest of the tree at all and definitely not the shield boosting tier right before it. You can say it's not contradictory, but theres literally a skill right before it that gives you % boosts for how full your shield is instead how empty. \n\nIt's not a problem for just that mod. It's a problem for the tree itself because if I'm going down the under cover tree there is a skill that I cant use effectively because all of my other skills are focused on an opposite goal in that tree.\n\nLike I said before, it's not game breaking and it doesnt make <PERSON> awful. But it is absolutely out of place and hurts that skill in the long run for no reason.", "453" ], [ "And yet <PERSON> boosts the ability to keep the shield up. He boosts recharge rates and delays, he can drop his own shield in that very tree for \"oh fuck\" situations, and if he goes down other trees he can completely recharge his shield by dropping a clone. \n\nThis all comes down to optimization. If a character has a focus on having big shields, carrying a shield, and recharging his personal shield then a skill that focuses on not having a shield is contradictory. Optimal builds dont mesh well with things that try to cover everything and the kitchen sink, and the thing that's going to affect a characters ease of play is how well they lend themselves to be optimized for certain goals. And if <PERSON> wants a build that plays off of no shields, it shouldn't be located in a spot that forces the player to makes it harder to trigger that condition.", "354" ], [ "And yet I didnt mention the mod at all in my last post. I was talking about the skill. You're essentially saying well i dont believe it so your argument is irrelevant. If you'd like to bring the mod back into it, the fact that the mod and the skill synergize together at all strengthens the point because the game implies these two would work well together. Which they would if the skill wasnt housed in a tree that doesnt work well with it. \n\nIf I have to look at the mod and say: It goes well with rise to the occaision but you probably wont take that skill unless you have 5 points to use for nothing because the tree doesnt go well with having no shields then that is a problem. \n\nBut anyway, we're beating the point to death at this point. My stance is that a skill that can be used to great effect but has its benefit reduced in efficiency because you have to spec into skills that run opposite to it to get it is a problem. Especially when Zane isnt over achieving to begin with so theres no reason to add a barrier of access to a good quality of life skill for a playstyle that the game is encouraging players to try through a class mod. You can disagree still if you'd like as I was mainly just pointing out an example because you said you hadn't seen any contradictions in his tree. I'm not here to convince you otherwise if you are set on it.", "508" ], [ "I don't know if this is a bug, but I have a hard time believing its intended. NPC dialogue is playing every 3-5 seconds when I'm in side quest zones even when I'm fighting. It's at the point where NPC's are basically repeatedly shouting at me to interact with whatever the mission objective is while I'm still fighting mobs and bosses that spawn because of the objective. It's extremely annoying hearing the same 2 lines over and over again in the middle of a gunfight and needs to be toned down.", "439" ], [ "I found the lower red chest quantity to be an issue with Borderlands 2. At least compared to 1. It felt like they were gun shy of people abusing red chests to get loot and wanted to push people toward mobbing and boss farming. Seems like this continues with 3 as the only time I've really found red chests has been during missions. I've looked around nooks and crannies to see if they've hidden any in the maps and haven't found much really.", "444" ], [ "<PERSON> and Moze have been my favorites to play so far. It feels good making use of <PERSON> gadgets even if they aren't game breakingly strong, and <PERSON> is just really good at using guns and grenades while surviving pretty much anything. Fl4k was fun but I didn't enjoy his pets as much as I usually do in pet classes, and once the novelty of going invisible and seeing everything die wears off there isn't much else to do.", "369" ], [ "I'd say Moze=Fl4k > <PERSON> > Zane after what we've seen in the first few days. Both Moze and Fl4k are ridiculous in going through endgame content quickly, but there are some considerations to keep in mind. They both can make the game just as easy, but in my opinion <PERSON> seems like she'll likely be more resilient to change in the future because her skills are just really good and synergize really well. Fl4k gets a power spike because of Fade Away and specific guns interacting with Fade away, and there is an inherit fragility to the build if any pieces of that combo changes in the future. In terms of pure power though, the difference is negligible considering nothing is hard enough to challenge either of them. They both make everything too easy for very little investment in the end.\n\n<PERSON> has a lot of potential and also does very well, so I just want to note that I'm not knocking her by putting her below Fl4k and Moze. I know less about her since its still early and I haven't played her a ton. And as far as <PERSON> goes...he's viable and shouldn't be avoided just because he doesn't have an easy to access broken build.", "456" ], [ "I haven't heard of any item combos that lead to <PERSON> being as crazy as FA Fl4k yet. His skill trees are so jack of all trades that he doesn't really hone in on gun damage, crits, and crit damage the same way Fl4k does. Without a heavily damage focused base to start on a lot of skill synergy towards a singular goal its harder to find overpowered combos than it is with Fl4k.\n\nPeople seem to be doing either cryo builds with shield/drone or shield/clone or speed builds rooted in drone/clone or drone/shield. People have been having mixed feelings on whether the clone can live in the endgame or not, so it seemed like drone/shield and cryo was the flavor of the day yesterday. Downside to that is cryo doesn't help on bosses, so it doesn't really give that Fl4k effect at all if you're looking for a bonus on bosses. Haven't seen much discussion on it to indicate any new results yet today from any new legendary weapons or mods.", "656" ], [ "If you get lucky and get a nice torgue shotgun you can use fade away to blow up badasses around lvl 10 and on. The full build doesnt come online til much later though. I'd run rakk attack so you can use any gun without having to worry about having high bullet counts for fade away.", "128" ], [ "Exactly. If they were trying to nail down Fade Away with that nerf then its a little concerning that they thought damage was the best option to try first. Nerfing damage is just going to make them worse for everyone except Fl4k. Note: I haven't used Moze enough yet to know if it affects her at all, but it sounds like she's flexible enough that she wouldn't care either.", "884" ], [ "I'd agree with this also because it could lead to some use on his abilities that want him to activate skills often. It feels like he plays tug of war between maintaining uptime on his action skills and using his action skills to keep all of his potential buffs up, so being able to pick it up and put it down right away to kick off more buffs would be nice. Not necessarily needed, but a nice option to have.", "221" ], [ "Correct. You could disconnect your ps4 from the internet in the settings, or if you're really afraid of it auto-downloading you could temporarily turn off your router until you go into the ps4 and remove the internet connection. Basically, anything that stops it from downloading will let you run on the old version of the game. Not sure if there is an option on ps4 to tell an individual game not to update or not, but if there is you could do that instead of disconnecting your connection to everything.", "450" ], [ "Sure, no problem. There is a modifier called Guerrillas in the Mist. It changes the skill so it lasts 8 seconds and you can fire as much as you want in those 8 seconds. However, the drawback is supposed to be a longer cooldown with lower crit damage. What actually happens, though, is that you use a torgue shotgun sticky bomb and detonate the bombs after Fade Away is over. Because the skill is in cooldown, you have the opportunity to reduce the cooldown of it by dealing critical hits. All those bombs you laid are guaranteed critical hits because they were shot while in Fade Away. The result is guaranteed crits that then reset your cooldown which then puts you back into Fade Away to do it all over again. So 8 seconds of invisibility and crits really becomes invisibility and crits for as long as the user wants.\n\nWhich is why a damage nerf seems out of place because it doesn't change the problem that Fl4k can basically remove themselves from combat while still dishing out a wave of constant crits. A damage nerf slows them down, but it also punishes <PERSON> and <PERSON> who could have used it without exploiting its properties.", "884" ], [ "There haven't been a ton that have stuck with me personally. The psycho's have some good lines like usual, but most of the bandit lines I remember revolve around the Children of the Vault or their theme of worship/sacrifice. I don't remember a ton in BL3 that are just outright iconic and funny like past games outside of the psycho's craziness. Its still early though so maybe some will stand out to me later.", "369" ], [ "People don't play diablo 3 seasonal long term anymore because no one wants to fish for perfect condition rifts to compete on leaderboards for the xth year in a row when seasons aren't coming with any new worthwhile content. Doesn't have anything to do with the loot. Those loot rates existed when seasons were still being played religiously as well.", "538" ], [ "> Start up the season, get to lvl 70 in 3-4 hours, get your full set 1-2 hour later, then you farm to get your missing pieces in like 1-2 days and you are done and all you have left is greater rifts and ladder.\n\nYou don't have everything you need for seasons just by having set pieces and a few legendaries. If your whole goal for a season is to get the gear you need to start playing the end game and stop leveling, then sure I guess? \n\nThere's plenty to strive for in a season that takes more than a week for an average player that isn't playing 8 hours a day. The problem is that the method of grinding those itself is boring after you've done that method 4-5 years in a row with minimal change. Ranking up gems, finding ancients, finding primals, grinding out paragon, etc. There's plenty of treadmills to jump onto but the problem is it all comes back to having to do rifts to achieve them. Barely anyone still wants to do the same rifts they were doing when you aren't providing them new content to them. \n\n > dont you think people would be playing seasons longer if loot drops were lowered? it would add in more content to look forward to instead of just competing one the leaderboards.\n\nYou're acting like in a 5 year old expansion to a game the loot rate is the only variable that needs to be considered. You could drop the drop rates of diablo 3 and start a new season and no one will rush over to play it because there's nothing new on the table other than \"go do rifts with lower drop rates!\".\n\nYou could have your fabled low drop rates in BL3 and the playerbase is still going to be bored in 5 years if the endgame isn't constantly providing them with something new to do.", "360" ], [ "The progression of the game should be fixed then. If mayhem 3 loot rate is high and players are getting into mayhem 3 on day 1 then the question should be why is mayhem 3 easy enough for players to jump into on day 1 with no difficulty at all? The buildup should be getting to Mayhem 3. We shouldn't be nerfing the ultimate reward for building your character up. We should be making it so you actually have to build your character up in Mayhem 1 and 2 first. Mayhem 3 should be the \"farm your BiS annointed gear\" mode that is hard enough to justify that loot rate while Mayhem 1 and 2 should be your \"you're going to get a couple legendaries per couple boss fights and most will be trash but it will help you get to the better quality crazy loot rate in Mayhem 3\" slightly easier modes.\n\nIf one legendary gun didn't break the entire structure of the game then there wouldn't need to be a fear of a player feeling like they don't have to work for anything after finding a few legendaries.", "360" ], [ "Yeah...Apparently its decided that hunting for legendaries with the rolls that you want isn't rewarding enough. You have to hunt for any legendaries at all otherwise its not grinding or earning anything according to the people who \"have nothing to work for\".\n\nIdeally they need to change the quality of loot drops if they are going to reduce the drop rate on the one mode that should have a rewarding drop rate. There's a lot of legendaries and most of them aren't worth anything except cash. If I'm going to get only a legendary or two if I'm lucky for killing a boss a few times in the final difficulty of the game then they should be legendaries that are worth my time and not just vendor trash.", "360" ], [ "I would argue that the ability to make it a cakewalk by reloading is a reason why I would call Mayhem 3 easy. I know what you're trying to say, that there is some valid challenge in it. And there is. But, if I were making a list of \"why are people getting to Mayhem 3 and farming it effectively so fast\" stuff like reloading mod's to get exactly what you need to walk through the boss would be on that list. Not sure how they would fix it in that regard either, sadly.", "360" ], [ "That seems to be the way the wind is blowing. They may just say 1 and 2 are a bit of a wash at this point, and make 3 another step along the way by making another mayhem or two further out that is designed for people with more gear to min max their rolls through more rewards. It would be a good sell for them to include it with a dlc, and they give themselves some time to tune the progression difficulty more. I'd say your expectation is a safe bet right now.", "880" ], [ "That could be a good solution. Really I think the struggle right now is that we have people who want to optimize rolls and get perfect copies of weapons tugging on one side of the rope and people who want each legendary drop to feel special even if it means that you're more likely to just get an average copy of an item than you are to ever get a perfect roll. Improving roll quality instead of drop rate could be a good compromise in the long run, or at least I hope its something they'd consider.", "221" ], [ "Theres some good ones here and there, but a lot of it feels forced. And not forced in a borderlands way. Forced in a \"oh we need to be hilarious, what is topical or funny for the youths from 4 years ago?\" Or...its just, you know, butts and poop. \n\nMy guess is it's different writers on staff? I'm not sure. It feels like someone who likes borderlands humor wrote a lot of it but they dont quite know how to hit the same tone as past borderlands humor. Almost every character feels like they're posting to social media and trying to be the person who gets the most laughing emojis. Which makes sense for the villains, but when most npcs do it there is no contrast and it feels off.\n\nTheres some stuff I genuinely laughed at, but it was usually the subtle stuff that was more like wow I'm glad they thought to do that. (Like the tinks in the Mouthpiece fight)\n\nNote it's worth mentioning that I greatly prefer a humor level somewhere around bl1, dr. <PERSON>, and general <PERSON>. Something in between bl1 and 2. A mixture of serious and humor so that when the humor is there it feels like a treat to find instead of a smack in the face.", "522" ], [ "It's important to keep in mind that for a lot of people legendaries aren't the best gear. Anointed legendaries with the correct roll are which were still quite rare and would have been more rare on its own without the loot tink. Some people who are upset aren't upset because they are getting less legendaries that they'll sell anyway. They're upset because less legendaries means lower chances to roll the 1 out of the 100+ weapon they want with ideal rolls to perfect their build plan. It's a grind for them either way, but they want their efforts to at least feel possible.\n\nGeneralizing that group as being people who are annoyed by effort is a bit disingenuous considering how much effort it takes to get BiS annointed items in this game to begin with.", "924" ], [ "Thank you for saying this. So many people try to defend low loot drops by bringing up Borderlands 2 and acting like the faithful hardcore of the series want low loot drops because thats how Borderlands 2 does it. In reality, Borderlands 1 exists. Where you could farm the armory and terramorphous and walk away with hundreds of legendarys per hour. And people still played and enjoyed that game for a long time until BL2 came out. Because they weren't walking away with perfect rolls or with pearlescents (seems like annointments are the stand-in for these until we actually get them).\n\nGetting legendaries doesn't end the grind when there is a significantly large pool of legendaries that can drop from anything and most legendaries aren't going to roll well at all. This isn't a game where you get one copy of a legendary and that is all you need for all time (if the game difficulty is actually difficult that is, right now its broken but thats another issue). Applying Borderlands 2 logic to a game that doesn't drop loot and handle legendary quality in the same way that Borderlands 2 does just because you played Borderlands 2 is shortsided to say the least.", "538" ], [ "A nice compromise may be to make smaller loot pools based on the planet or activity, but I wouldn't want to see exactly what BL2 did again. I'd rather get frequent drops that may or may not be what I want anywhere in the world instead of no drops from 1 boss until I eventually get the drop I want (maybe) days later. Honestly if they just made the loot system Borderlands 2 again I'd just walk away. Anything that involves me playing for a couple hours in one night and getting nothing is a no go. I've got too much going on for that. I'd rather get some random legendaries to evaluate if they're keeps or walk away with a nice legendary that I wasn't looking for. Targeted farming just feels really bad to me.\n\nIt all comes down to psychology. If a player gets a legendary frequently it will still feel like a reward and activate that part of the brain even if it isn't what they want or the big payoff. Because it could have been what they wanted. If the game gives them nothing for long periods of time until they maybe get what they want that doesn't happen. There's a reason the lottery has smaller rewards than the jackpot even if the reward is just enough money to buy another ticket. If a player doesn't feel like a reward just around the corner then it isn't as addicting and runs the risk of being weighed an invaluable use of their time.", "360" ], [ "Yep. And you could still get godlike rolls on the legendary that made a difference that you could feel. It's just the difference between showing off that you got a legendary at all and showing off that you got the perfect amazing everything you could have gotten on that legendary. I played Borderlands 1 for over 1000 hours between two systems and still didn't have perfect rolls on most of my legendarys even though I had looked over a countless amount of legendary drops. And those that I did have near perfect rolls on you can bet I felt proud of. The idea that you can't be proud of a special drop unless nothing is dropping at all is a really weird tone that Borderlands 2 has set.", "221" ], [ "How many legendarys did you get that were keepers and annointed, though? Thats why some people are complaining about the complaints that may have lead to a drop rate nerf.\n\nBecause a lot of the people complaining about the drop rates before the nerf are applying a Borderlands 2 mindset of \"I should go a long time without getting a legendary drop\" to a game that has a completely different philosophy to legendaries. BL2 was setup to be a targeted loot farm where you could manipulate the RNG by fighting specific bosses. That targeting necessitated a low drop rate because players could narrow down what would drop on their own. BL3 is a massive loot pool with significant variance in rolls on top of annointed properties that can drop anywhere.\n\nThere is very little BL2 targeted farming as of right now, so everyone complaining how everything drops more than BL2 are missing the point that you're way less likely to get what you want so drops have to be higher to make up the difference. Now people who were complaining that the rate wasn't close enough to BL2 are clashing with the people who have either accepted the new system or understand the need for a higher drop rate (ala BL1 or diablo) which is drawing all of the complaining to a boil.\n\nTL;DR: Legendary drops weren't rare. Good legendaries were. People who want BL1/diablo 3 loot versus people who want BL2 loot are complaining at each other now.", "656" ], [ "The blue tree tier 3 skill actively hurts <PERSON>'s skill tree design imo. It puts an extremely restrictive box on every skill tree he has.\n\nAs a skill its...fine. Its boring. A flat numbers increase to a number of <PERSON>'s other skills.\n\nAs far as why I believe it actively hurts his trees: They have to balance around it. They have to give him a lot of kill skills to make it worth it, but none of those kill skills can be too good on their own otherwise the skill becomes unreasonable. As a result you have a bunch of okay kill skills that go from okay to decent/good and barely any passive buffs that other hunters get in their trees.\n\nIts a bad balancing act because if its too good then <PERSON> has to take it to get more value out of their kill skills. A skill you must take to make a chunk of your other skills good is bad. If its bad then no Zane wants to take it and their left with a bunch of average kill skill buffs in place of anything else. So on the player side you're almost expected to take the skill if you take any kill skills because they were all designed with that skill in mind. It should instead be introducing something for <PERSON> to do that he couldn't do before.\n\nThe skill would be better if it wasn't +40% effect and was instead something like per active kill skill x happens. Or when you trigger a kill skill, x happens. Anything would be better than a % value buff that just leads to inherently lower value kill skills all over the trees.\n\nEdit: Changed color. Figures I say red instead of blue. I meant the blue tree, my bad!\n\nEdit2: trying to salvage my post from my brainfart. Removed references to capstones.", "656" ], [ "Pretty sure it's the opposite. The trigger on action skill is mid and the percent and duration buff is cap. But I've been jumping between characters a lot so I dont mind a fact check if I happen to be wrong.\n\nEdit: looks like I'm wrong if the app is right. Well I guess my post is just all over the place then. I do believe that particular skill hurts his trees, but I guess it's not relevant when talking about capstones anymore :\\", "991" ], [ "They've said this before and have mentioned that they would prefer to add new skill trees onto existing characters instead. Which I am personally fine with. I'd rather see them also use that time to come up with new modes or some kind of seasonal gameplay instead of expecting the same story to be as fun a 5th time just because they added a new character. I know that no dlc characters won't be everyone's preference since its a change of pace for the series, but I want to see how it plays out before I judge the choice too heavily.", "116" ], [ "Exactly how I feel. The everything can be anywhere style is much more friendly to me because I don't want to run the same boss over and over again. Sure, one might say there is one best boss to run right now, but I am not forced to run that if I don't care about losing some efficiency. In BL2 you have to run the one boss that drops the item you're looking for and that is a major buzzkill. Going into BL3 for a few hours I can decide whether I want to farm warden or if I want to do anything else. Going into BL2 I felt like I was wasting my time if I didn't play the one boss that dropped the item I needed most.\n\nAnd in the BL2 style its a lot harder to find an accidental surprise. Maybe in Diablo 3 or BL3 (or even BL1, honestly) I'm looking for one item but I get this insane godlike roll on another item which encourages me to try something I wasn't planning on doing. That is exciting gameplay and that is really hard to do when you're practically required to pick and choose specifically which legendary you're going to allow yourself to farm that evening. Pushing the bee button over and over again until the bee falls out is boring as hell because you're either going to get a bee you can use or you're not. There's practically no surprise besides whether or not you have to keep killing that boss or you can finally stop.", "250" ], [ "The same could be said about targeted loot farming as well. There's only a select few legendarys that you actually need for your build, so once you have that you're done. You'll go kill X the invincible just to use your gear against a challenge but ultimately you know you're just going to use those items you target farmed because they're the combo that you farmed to kill the endgame. Unless you go back and kill story boss <PERSON> for 12 hours to see if you get a new drop better than yours, you aren't replacing your gear very often if at all because you know most of the game doesn't have a chance to give you a replacement. Especially not if you're using items that you specifically farmed from mission rewards because a lot of those are more godlike than a lot of the legendary.\n\nNo matter what the loot system is the players who can play more than an hour a week are going to hit a plateau where only minor adjustments will cause them to exchange a copy of their weapon. At least with diablo 3, borderlands 1, and borderlands 3 you can do any content you want and still have a chance to find it.\n\nAs an example, in BL1 that had a similar freestyle legendarys everywhere plan: I replaced my Corrosive defiler more times than I can remember. Each one was different in slight ways. Until I did eventually get one that was a near perfect roll a couple years later. And you can bet I showed that one off to all my friends because they didn't have one like it. In BL2 once I got the legendary I needed as long as it was usable I didn't farm for it anymore on that character. Why would I? If it got the job done there was no way I was going to subject myself to repeating the same boss over and over again just for a chance at one legendary. The idea that players don't feel value in getting legendarys everywhere and that you won't feel proud of it unless you worked your fingers to the bone just to get one drop is crazy in a series that already disproved that with its first entry through the armory, terramorphous, and the world legendarys in general.", "924" ] ]
468
[ 1407, 5777, 8372, 10765, 20321, 10620, 7122, 13262, 7755, 5517, 16341, 6258, 10123, 4984, 7498, 18471, 13944, 14481, 19855, 16179, 5404, 11427, 738, 8473, 20768, 6214, 13222, 10517, 21079, 22811, 17594, 19883, 21189, 9432, 6293, 17342, 11215, 18036, 19616, 6553, 3110, 10847, 18918, 21615, 24357, 1174, 6931, 7253, 1081, 13506, 2843, 4663, 1891, 10308, 19400, 11323, 9664, 13252, 25417, 2039, 18155, 17433, 14768, 12028, 10905, 12435, 3073, 19942, 10074, 4590, 153, 9797, 3156, 15668, 23537, 4882, 22736, 19050, 12822, 21617, 7022, 5552, 167, 7460, 1059, 3294, 7739, 14512, 14693, 9233, 5115, 3303, 1625, 3515, 16630, 14798, 22820, 16009, 5892, 11714, 16333, 21336, 9881, 12494, 13339, 13287, 7797, 4183, 9585, 1284, 9716, 7204, 16657, 13532, 12003, 14818, 9547, 3829, 1598, 19926, 13897, 2485, 4562, 13218, 23277, 16233, 8399, 23898, 16697, 2706, 17408, 855, 24528, 25415, 20780, 7318, 6041, 11091, 22704, 8960, 24702, 15482, 5803, 21175, 9214, 9118, 13867, 4831, 9605, 8066, 22071, 13732, 12019, 5994, 18008, 14237, 7188, 2120, 20882, 12719, 25491, 12117, 6206, 25347, 22458, 24577, 10222, 17110, 3563, 25266, 7666, 16950, 12460, 14460, 10085, 4415, 24907, 11250, 2634, 22897, 14522, 6363, 9774, 2918, 8284, 11769, 3441, 7650, 15055, 7740, 10407, 16387, 9982, 7750, 7016, 13492, 4844, 11965, 5951, 17488, 1144, 22373, 1641, 17099, 14496, 8884, 14816, 13999, 501, 4235, 24540, 18530, 25108, 15213, 4386, 7788, 7798, 19207, 110, 11612, 8629, 2172, 10381, 12404, 23774, 13386, 24275, 14603, 14021, 7233, 14046, 5336, 433, 2045, 12586, 17097, 19429, 12202, 7550, 13653, 25243, 19643, 21252, 1427, 3802, 14785, 10551, 23156, 21801, 16278, 21121, 4976, 14106, 17109, 23300, 15100, 6294, 9621, 337, 5502, 2329, 21434, 13144, 11737, 7196, 753, 11440, 2738, 8652, 13132, 17245, 11760, 6630, 9925, 20360, 18793, 22137, 22730, 15354, 17998, 2356, 24228, 20330, 209, 733, 5093, 1248, 19602, 14368, 5471, 23420, 10102, 11134, 12065, 19420, 13640, 1280, 2296, 3724, 17635, 9123, 4999, 10150, 7457, 15959, 1722, 6153, 5192, 3426, 13036, 4302, 8261, 21938, 21457, 6182, 13440, 23414, 4176, 12343, 3616, 19218, 6823, 21798, 25163, 13445, 19516, 14825, 18490, 13841, 20295, 12482, 11599, 4535, 12473, 16025, 19676, 1636, 3638, 3696, 12577, 11403, 2920, 5913, 830, 12118, 23525, 2404, 12942, 24598, 1968, 6457, 9389, 25420, 6957, 2998, 8913, 292, 1057, 17261, 16132, 18090, 10805, 6391, 7995, 11504, 13279, 14832, 24332, 1224, 24473, 14544, 8980, 7897, 804, 1961, 23775, 21089, 9873, 5396, 20834, 3415, 22874, 22022, 15918, 22282, 20942, 23344, 11598, 1810, 19019, 25513, 4970, 118, 3884, 5642, 7185, 16899, 6251, 22479, 4076, 6243, 12190, 25487, 12515, 389, 14535, 2260, 12395, 10162, 21005, 11796, 13865, 12812, 7023, 5293, 5177, 8219, 19846, 1561, 283, 23065, 1981, 5101, 10175, 8821, 22917, 10344, 21523, 11488, 334, 14682, 7670, 12554, 3468, 2537, 12931, 6507, 25261, 9541, 13666, 8731, 24343, 21851, 11258, 5863, 9671, 6672, 15847, 6895, 16059, 1694, 12549, 383, 13301, 14542, 14575, 16479, 7251, 2934, 20804, 21270, 7184, 9770, 24490, 442, 14853, 20143, 3698, 12967, 2363, 6195, 3273, 3906, 7728, 3314, 14801, 1124, 24973, 12555, 3810, 23453, 13791, 16309, 25299, 18224, 5415, 8581, 22953, 16244, 9967, 7229, 5013, 14957, 8609, 17546, 24191, 313, 24288, 350 ]
reddit_dump_-Mochaccina-
[ [ "> Ok, won't even bash that since I'm not knowledgeable about it.\n\nBashing is unChristlike.\n\n > What role does it do? What dominion do they have over teaching and church?\n\nThe ordinary and universal Magisterium which make up the Magisterium is the teaching authority of the Church, the Deposit of Faith.\n\nFrom the *Catechism of the Catholic Church*:\n\n85 *\"The task of giving an authentic interpretation of the Word of God, whether in its written form or in the form of Tradition, has been entrusted to the living teaching office of the Church alone. Its authority in this matter is exercised in the name of <PERSON>.\" This means that the task of interpretation has been entrusted to the bishops in communion with the successor of <PERSON>, the Bishop of Rome.*\n\n86 *\"Yet this Magisterium is not superior to the Word of God, but is its servant. It teaches only what has been handed on to it. At the divine command and with the help of the Holy Spirit, it listens to this devotedly, guards it with dedication and expounds it faithfully. All that it proposes for belief as being divinely revealed is drawn from this single deposit of faith.\"*\n\nHere is more on the Magisterium: _URL_0_", "320" ], [ "> \"made in the likeness of what's in the earth, sea, or heaven.\"\n\nThat would mean to worship. Statues aren't worshiped. You're using modern definitions again.\n\n > so we see a graven image of virgin mary, carved from stone. hard to dance around that, and these children are bowing their heads to the virgin mary?\n\nBowing isn't worship. It's reverence for the woman who birthed the King. If we say it isn't worship, you need to respect that because you are on the outside looking in and don't fully grasp from your modern viewpoint our old ways.\n\n > This catholic website states CLEARLY that they pray to <PERSON> and saints.\n\nPray doesn't mean worship to us. In the modern sense it may, but in the older sense that we go by, it means merely to ask and petition. We \"pray\" to the living asking them to pray for us. The Saints are alive in Christ. You're spouting off basic stuff that shows ignorance to ancient Christian practice. There is a term, \"pray tell\" that used to be used in conversations, \"Pray tell me what you mean?\" as an example. It does not mean, \"Worship tell me what you mean?\"\n\n > \nkeep an open mind and a watchful eye, things aren't as they appear.\n\nThat is advice to you, someone obviously ignorant to Catholicism. I've been studying it for YEARS. You put everything into your modern understanding and wonder why you see things that aren't there.\n\nTo perpetuate your myths is damaging when you've been told that you have misunderstood. I told you about the 10 Commandments, how you were wrong, and you perpetuate the myth still. That's a sin of bearing false witness.\n\nI'm educating you here.", "703" ], [ "> What is natural marriage? Is it the term for marriage that occurred outside of the Church's purview?\n\nAs the other commenter said, it's when the husband or wife isn't baptized, or both, and they are marrying for the first time or widowed. Even being married in the Catholic Church, there can be a natural marriage if one spouse isn't baptized.\n\nSacramental marriages occur when both husband and wife are baptized validly.\n\nIf a person who is baptized Catholic or, in the case of converts, has been received into the Church, they must marry in the Church or receive a dispensation to marry outside a church or their marriage is neither Sacramental or natural but invalid.\n\n > Is it cohabitation?\n\nNot unless there is no civil authority. A natural marriage occurs with a public declaration of the intent to be married, to be exclusive, to be unto one another, and with the intent to be open to life just like with Sacramental marriage. That in society is done with civil marriage.", "83" ], [ "> Does the baptism have to be Catholic? I’m a lapsed Catholic married to a Baptist.\n\nIf you were married in the Catholic Church or received a dispensation your marriage would be valid. If you married outside of the Church and received no dispensation, your marriage is not valid and you are cohabiting. Your cohabitation can become marriage by convalidation. You'd have to see a Priest for that.\n\nValid baptism requires running water (examples are full immersion, pouring over the crown of the head), the intent of the minister of baptism to do as the Church and Christ command, have Trinitarian intention, and baptize \"in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit\". Baptists cover all of this for valid baptism.", "320" ], [ "> And I would add to that , the more difficult life in Christian churches becomes.\n\nI don't mean to be \"that guy\" but Protestants don't have churches but instead ecclesial communities. It is important that even though we must have a sort of ecumenism, as they are Christians, that we do not hold that their ecclesial communities are equal to the Catholic Church. It is important that they become Catholic and join with the Catholic Church and the Body of Christ in full communion.", "320" ], [ "> <PERSON> said I am the way the truth and the life, no one comes to the Father except through me. (John 14:6). He is the only way to the Father. Mary and Saints aren't. 1 Timothy 2:5 says For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man <PERSON>.\n\n > The ten commands also forbid idols. I'm staying with the Bible, not a passive aggressive post of someone who wants to clash me and / or promote Catholics and Orthodoxes.\n\nYou still show ignorance to Catholic and Orthodox teaching.\n\nIf you bothered to look at our Catechism (Catholic) you'd see that we believe <PERSON> to be the only Mediator. Maybe like another commenter said, you should look into what Catholics believe by Catholics before spouting off because it makes you look bad.\n\nWe don't go by the modern definition of \"pray\" which to you means only worship. We go by its true meaning, to ask and petition. Christians have always believed that those in Heaven are alive in <PERSON>, therefore we ask them and those on earth to pray FOR us to GOD. If we're getting specific we pray (ask) to those on earth to pray for us to GOD. You need to stop perpetuating these damaging myths about brethren in Christ.\n\nWe do not have idols. Idols are things put before God. God is only worshiped by us and put first before everything, even the Bible.\n\n > The church accepts everyone, Atheists, Catholics, Muslims, etc.\n\nAlso, the fact that you lumped us in with Atheists and Muslims shows that you have no idea what you are talking about as unlike the other two, we're Christian.\n\n > But, they also accept \"Christian\" couples living in iniquity (fornication),\n\nAlso, about fornicating couples: In our Church they may not receive the Eucharist, however we believe like the Orthodox that the Church is not a museum of saints but a hospital for sinners. You act like a Pharisee not permitting sinners into your ecclesial community's chapel.\n\nYou are a sinner like them. You have bore false witness in your post and in your comment. I am a sinner too. We're all sinners.\n\nEDIT: Reformatted comment, added more.", "320" ], [ "> I really don't think I am the one who is right. I read the bible and it says fornicators will not inherit the Kingdom of God. These couples know they live in sin.\n\nSo they should just have to sit at home until they are not fornicating anymore? Perhaps going to service might plant a seed that their way of going about things is wrong. Also, how do you know they are fornicating?\n\n > But sex is more important to them (their words, not mine).\n\nDid you interview them to find that out?\n\nYou sound like the Pharisee who was glad that he wasn't a tax collector.", "589" ], [ "I wouldn't personally as others who may not know you might have the wrong idea, as others have said they are worn by gang members, for some reason. I don't know your gender but if you're a woman, there are Rosary necklaces out there for you to show your devotion to God and also use as a Rosary. They're often smaller than a regular Rosary with smaller beads and don't hang as low, and also clasp behind the neck. I don't think that's disrespectful as it's intended to be a necklace (although intention matters) and AFAIK wouldn't have the gang stuff attached. As long as you're not wearing it for just jewellery, you should be fine.\n\nAlso, it's a bit late for saying <PERSON>! But belated <PERSON> anyway. ;)", "179" ], [ "My Parish prints out how much was donated weekly in every bulletin; it includes what was put in the baskets, paid online, through text message, the kiosk, etc. Once a year all the Parish finances are put in a bulletin so we know how much went where. My Diocese is also pretty open with its finances. One of the stipulations for Pastors in my Diocese is financial transparency instituted by our now retired Bishop and no doubt will be continued by our Bishop Designate.\n\nAlso, Catholics don't tithe, they gift. :-P", "703" ], [ "I've never come across this myself at any of the Novus Ordo Masses I've gone to, thankfully. For the Easter Vigil Mass we have a small orchestra with drums, but usually it's organ or piano rarely a violin if we don't have the pianist/organist at later Masses (I prefer organ only if an instrument has to be used..my Protestant upbringing only had organs).\n\nNow, at the TLM I love to go to there's no instruments at all and outside of two a cappella hymns, only chant. ❤\n\nI hope NO Masses will go back to organs only if an instrument has to be used and no contemporary music, only hymns and chant.", "703" ], [ "I don't know what all to say but I would offer you a big ole warm hug!\n\nIf my husband was like that you bet ya I'd do what you did and get the keys and go anyway. You're a smart lady! That was very mean and out of line of your husband not to take you guys to church if he didn't want to go. Yes, as wives we're supposed to be submissive but our husbands are supposed to love us in return, and being that controlling isn't showing you love. I hope that he realizes this and makes a change for the better, for you, for your children, for his relationship with God.\n\nMay God Bless you all!", "164" ], [ "The Mass isn't really about the Homily, though it's good for teaching. It's about the Liturgy of the Word and Most Holy Eucharist (emphasis on the latter). Catholics must go to Mass every Sunday and day of obligation. One should be trying their best to pay attention. If your mind wanders, focus and bring it back. That works with me. Homilies are shorter than sermons, we have homilies.", "703" ], [ "I can give these bits from the *Catechism of the Catholic Church*. Make of it what you will. It all boils down to you and your free will, choosing to believe or not to believe.\n\n----\n\n**CCC 1033-1036:**\n\n1033 *We cannot be united with God unless we freely choose to love him. But we cannot love God if we sin gravely against him, against our neighbor or against ourselves: \"He who does not love remains in death. Anyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him.\" Our Lord warns us that we shall be separated from him if we fail to meet the serious needs of the poor and the little ones who are his brethren. To die in mortal sin without repenting and accepting God's merciful love means remaining separated from him for ever by our own free choice. This state of definitive self-exclusion from communion with God and the blessed is called \"hell.\"*\n\n1034 *<PERSON> often speaks of \"Gehenna\" of \"the unquenchable fire\" reserved for those who to the end of their lives refuse to believe and be converted, where both soul and body can be lost. <PERSON> solemnly proclaims that he \"will send his angels, and they will gather . . . all evil doers, and throw them into the furnace of fire,\" and that he will pronounce the condemnation: \"Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire!\"*\n\n1035 *The teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, \"eternal fire.\" The chief punishment of hell is eternal separation from God, in whom alone man can possess the life and happiness for which he was created and for which he longs.*\n\n----", "649" ], [ "It's a case closed scenario. Pope St. John Paul II closed the door on female ordination with *Ordinatio Sacerdotalis* which was infallible, it's dogmatic. If the Church changes her stance then that would mean that she was wrong and cannot be the true Church. The Church cannot be wrong in Faith and Morals, doctrine and dogma. All the faithful must assent to this dogmatic teaching of male only ordination.\n\nThe Church does not care that \"it's 2017, guys!\" Truth is timeless.\n\nWho are you to say that OP does not do charity? He or she is just stating Catholic belief in a Catholic subreddit.\n\nIf the beliefs of the Catholic Church cause arguments among Catholics then those on the other side of the argument are simply wrong.\n\nIt wouldn't make sense for a woman to be a Priest since the Priest is married to the Bride, the Church, and he acts *in Persona Christi*, which a woman cannot do.", "320" ], [ "The Priest acts *in Persona Christi* (in the Person of Christ) in the Mass. <PERSON> is the Bridegroom of the Bride which is the Church. A Priest is married to the Church, the Bride. How would it make sense that a woman would be married to the Bride? It doesn't make sense. Nuns are married to <PERSON>. It wouldn't make sense for male nuns to exist because they couldn't be married to <PERSON>, just as females cannot be married to the Bride of Christ.\n\nThe Catholic Faith is not *sola scriptura*. Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition are both important.", "320" ], [ "For the sake of this reply, we'll say God is real. If God is real, why would He bring those who rejected Him as being not real to Him after death, being as they were not His adopted children as those who believed/were baptized (or intended to be baptized or were martyred) are? They chose by unbelief, have separated themselves and thus He honors their free will by separating them from Him since He cannot and will not force belief on his creatures. Will they know that God is indeed real at that point? I believe so. Perhaps they regret their not believing, maybe they don't. It is not unjust, it is just for those who didn't believe as they didn't do as God willed us. Mankind chose free will instead of His way, so ultimately it is us who are unjust and unfair.\n\nThose who through no fault of their own who didn't know of <PERSON> or His Gospels, if they do what is written naturally into the heart of man and honor God some way, they too may achieve salvation.\n\nOne cannot get more plain in answering you. Even if this didn't help, I wish you well. :)", "951" ], [ "Basically the reason why it's missing is because it's an error of translation, the Bibles who have this verse are based on the Textus Receptus (think the KJV and its modern translations) which wasn't an accurate manuscript. Those verses aren't exactly Scripture even though for 5 centuries Protestant Christians have used them. The Latin Vulgate, which is the first translation of the Bible does not have these omitted verses you may stumble upon when using the TR translations, which the TR came about roughly 11 centuries later. The Alexandrian texts are more accurate than Byzantine, which the TR used the latter. Modern translations that use the former are more accurate to the actual Scriptures in their languages and omit the erroneous verses.\n\nNone of my Bibles have verse 21 of <PERSON> either.", "487" ], [ "You're being really unreasonable and not at all charitable or loving. First off, adults need jobs to survive in this world, to feed themselves and their families. If my husband didn't have a job we'd be on the streets right now. Second, she's being a loving mom wanting to give her child a good birthday. She's here asking for support and all you can do is chastise her for needing to keep her job?! She has doubts, we all do, we're human! Pray for her that she can keep her job and restore her Faith!", "198" ], [ "We venerate <PERSON> as she is the tabernacle who bore the New and Everlasting Covenant. I can't say that I put her above God. Wet don't pray to her, only God. Asking intercession is a far cry from praying (in the context you're using; pray also means to ask).\n\nGod is the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, by the way.\n\nI'm not fooling myself..Allah is Arabic for the word god.. Arabic Christians use the word of their tongue for God.\n\nEDIT: Corrected the second paragraph and fleshed out the first.", "447" ], [ "Your question has no answer, really. However, if God made Himself known definitely, due to human nature, some would go with Him (that wouldn't have before because He had not revealed Himself yet) some would still reject Him because they have their own wants in this world that don't correspond to His wishes. So, no, not everyone would follow Him. I guess this won't be to your satisfaction either.\n\nForgive me for not answering to your liking, I'm very sick in real life with severe pelvic pain, leg pain, and nerve issues. Things get foggy brained because of it.", "951" ], [ "Mass is meant as a prayer to praise God, to be in His Holy Presence and especially the Presence of God the Son in the Most Holy Eucharist. Our feelings on Mass are irrelevant. I left Protestantism for Catholicism because Mass was the first place that I ever really felt His Presence and He is truly\npresent.\n\nAs a Catholic Candidate I would say that the Bible is not complete without the Deuterocanon. We use those books in our liturgy. They are Scripture and have been since the beginning, in the Canon.\n\nWas the whole slight at the Catholic Church in your last sentence necessary? What is your issue? Christians up until the 16th century used the Deuterocanon. The majority still do.\n\nHonestly, it doesn't seem that you're here to learn but rather to express bigotry against the CC, and maybe the other Churches that use the Deuterocanon.", "703" ], [ "You could say the same about the Eastern Orthodox Church, but it wouldn't be true. Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition have always been important since the beginning of Christianity. The Catholic Church does not lead anyone astray. People lead themselves astray by reading into teachings what they want.\n\nCatholics should be praying only to God and merely asking intercession of the Saints to pray to God on their behalf as they too pray directly to God along with the Saints. The ones you know don't follow the teachings if they're not praying (in the context of this comment, it means to give worship) to God. I haven't encountered what you've encountered.", "320" ], [ "Yeah, all those Catholics giving my family food when we were in need for nothing in return, being friendly and helpful are uncharitable, especially at Mass by not letting me receive the Most Holy Eucharist since I'm not in a state of grace as I'm not in full communion yet are big meanies! I mean, come on, really? Devout Catholics are the best. I can't wait to become a Catholic because of their charity (and want to contribute) and of course, first, belief, which would not have been possible were it not for Catholics and seeing the way they are and wondering how I can have that too, then looking into Catholicism and seeing its truth and feeling God in the Mass.", "320" ], [ "Again, the Pope is only infallible on matters of Faith and Morals, which you're not getting into. Vicar of Christ does not mean that. I've been studying for years to become Catholic and nothing you say is surprising in the least, nor is it anything the Church's Magisterium teaches even if said by a Pope. Sorry, but I'm not going to be a Protestant again.\n\nUpon further investigation, the quote you wrote is not on church documents but something said by Cardinal <PERSON> (later on Pope <PERSON>). The translation of what he said was \"The Pope represents <PERSON>.\" Not that he is. It was a Homily, by the way. He also cleared up what he meant in another Homily.\n\nEDIT: Second paragraph.", "320" ], [ "Actually, Latin Rite Catholic children take First Eucharist around 6 or 7 and are Confirmed (Chrismated) around 16. Eastern Rite Catholic infants are baptized, Chrismated, and communed like Eastern Orthodox.\n\nIt's only converts that must be Confirmed then receive First Eucharist (same Mass for all Sacraments including baptism, if not already baptized).\n\nThere's also a vast difference between Baptist communion and the Catholic Holy Eucharist.", "703" ], [ "I honestly don't think there's any room in Heaven for sadness. I believe, after all, once in Heaven we will witness the Beatific Vision and feel the warmth of His love and glory. Nothing on Earth can compare to that feeling of joy. Our earthly attachments will no longer matter to us. Along with the free gift of Salvation, free will brings one to God because they chose to believe and follow Him. Our free will will not be removed in Heaven but we'll no longer have our human minds, needs, wants, therefore the only thing left is to behold God in all His magnificent splendor with the rest of the Church Triumphant.\n\nHell is eternal separation from God. That is torture. Free will is also, I believe, present in Hell and either those in Hell will curse God for \"sending them there\" or lament for eternity wishing they had followed God, or had believed and followed Him. Free will can send people to Hell just as it can bring people closer to God, the avenue to which to be closer to the Father, through the Son, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God forever and ever.\n\nWe chose free will in the garden and now we have to live with it and take any consequences that may come. God is fair and just..we are not.", "951" ], [ "I recommend that maybe you take a step back and study the Catholic teachings and reasons for the things you object to. You might find instead of finding a church to match *your* ideas of Faith and morality that there's genuinely something to the oldest sects of Christianity in Faith and morality. I would suggest attending RCIA at your local Catholic Parish, doing study, reading the [Catechism](_URL_0_) and a [companion Catechism](_URL_1_).\n\nMay God Bless you on your journey!", "529" ], [ "Being a Christian is not dependent on carrying a gun or not. That's nuts. I am a true Christian and I would never carry a gun -- maybe except for a tiny keychain Derringer because it looks cool. Never loaded. Maybe one of those faux gun lighters. Anyways, we can get along just fine without them. I have no problem with those who only have them to go to the range, I do that too but I don't like the idea of guns in the church proper or even on the premises unless this person is a cop on duty. We have stepped up our security so it shouldn't be a problem. I also have a problem with people who carry knives over 3 inches.", "349" ], [ "> I'm somebody who cares about all of God's people and actually wants to know if something I'm doing might be inappropriate to somebody based on things that I wouldn't know due to my own limited experience.\n\nI care about all of God's people, I just can't live my life worried about walking on eggshells around everyone because I don't know what the list of offensive things of the day is. I generally just am polite to everyone and that works wonderful. :-) If you're not a jerk you have nothing to worry about.\n\n > That includes my black neighbour who might get offended by people wanting to touch his hair.\n\nNormal people don't go around touching other people's hair.", "336" ], [ "The New Testament is in koine Greek. There is also the Septuagint, a B.C. copy of Hebrew Scriptures. My Parish uses koine Greek for services (and English).\n\n > The Sabbath is definitely Christian (it is just not the Western Christian tradition).\n\nNor is it Eastern Orthodox or most of Oriental Orthodoxy (Tewahedo meet on Saturday and Sunday) which both have been around since the first century. We celebrate the Lord's Day. In the early Church, Christians had Liturgy and Eucharist on the first day of the week. Jewish converts went to synagogue on the Sabbath and Gentiles did not but both met on the first day of the week. We do that still.\n\n > These traditions are alive and well today, it is also why they insist on using the mispronunciation of <PERSON> (or <PERSON>).\n\nWe call Him Ἰησοῦς Χριστός (<PERSON>) as that is what He was called in the NT. <PERSON> is fine. He's not legalistic.\n\n > It is clearly a commandment to follow the Sabbath.\n\nWhen we follow <PERSON>, we follow the Sabbath.", "703" ], [ "> Christians are to observe the Sabbath as per Gods laws which are eternal and by our acceptance through <PERSON> as per the grafting. \n\n<PERSON> taught us not to be legalistic. Convert Gentile Christians didn't go to Liturgy on Saturday but instead on Sunday with their Jewish convert brethren who went to synagogue on Saturday but met for Liturgy on Sunday. Even in the 1st century Church Christians met on Sunday.", "703" ], [ "> <PERSON> observed the Sabbath. The apostles observed the Sabbath even after <PERSON>'s death. The early church observed the Sabbath for centuries. The writings of historians throughout the centuries confirms this eternal truth written by the very finger of God Himself.\n\nGentiles were not commanded to observe a specific day. Since the 1st century Christians met on the first day of the week. Jewish converts went to synagogue and the next day Liturgy. We observe the spirit of the law and that is fulfilled on that first day of the week for the fourth commandment.", "649" ], [ "> Everyone else understood who commented.\n\nGood for them. I'm sorry that I don't understand your wording. I will stand by that it was not clear.\n\n > we aren’t connecting you’re just telling me what you think I should know and won’t put faith that maybe I have seen what I say I’ve seen.\n\nYou may be wrong as you are not with these people 24/7. If you are visibly praying in public and making sure everyone knows you're reading the Bible, you're doing things wrong.\n\nI'm trying to get you to see that perhaps you are wrong about some people.\n\nI only put faith in God.", "951" ], [ "> When I meant Eastern vs Western Christianity, I did not mean to imply Eastern = Orthodox.\n\nEastern Orthodoxy is not Western Christianity nor is Oriental Orthodoxy.\n\n > Rather the original Christianity in the time of Yeshua. By Western Christianity, I meant to say the Catholic and subsequent Protestant traditions (mostly centered in the USA). \n\nOrthodoxy is neither of those. Orthodoxy has been around since the first century.\n\nHonestly you are communicating like some fringe groups of Protestants by insistence on a legalistic Sabbath and the \"proper name\". I'm guessing you're American.\n\n > Meeting on the first day of the week is not the original commandment, and that is the whole point. It is a tradition applied much later (and without Biblical significance). \n\nWe're not Jews are we? This is all covered in the council of Jerusalem. Even in the Bible Christians met on the first day.\n\n > And using the Greek name of <PERSON> is closer to the original, but still not his original name.\n\nAnd what does it matter? If someone called me a Greek version of my name or Hebrew I'd be cool with it. I'm sure <PERSON> is too for He surpasses nationality for there is no Jew nor Greek in Him.\n\n > I don't see the point if you already know his original name (as he called it).\n\nWe don't know the proper pronunciation or English spelling of it, much like the Tetragrammaton we should not say. I doubt He cares if we use English or Greek or whatever.\n\n > And Greek isn't as useful as a descriptive language as Hebrew anyways, it is a much more abstract and thematic language, whereas Hebrew is based on common root words, and more practical. \n\nIt's what the NT is written in, so I'll use that. If we're pedantic, He spoke in Aramaic.\n\n > And if you have Lord's day on Sunday, and then say we follow the Sabbath, it sounds like duplicity.\n\nWe follow <PERSON>. He is our Sabbath as He is the Lord of it. It was for man, not man for the Sabbath.\n\n > And obviously if you're a Bible follower, it is not up for interpretation.\n\nLike the early Christians, I'm not *Sola Scriptura*.", "703" ], [ "> In all respect for your denomination and Catholics why does it really matter.\n\nDenominations are in Protestantism.\n\nIt matters because we pass on our faith to our children and get our marriages blessed in the Church. For example, I would not want my children raised Protestant or Roman Catholic.\n\n > I guess I would think if your part of the body of Christ it really shouldn’t matter where you get married or attend as long as it’s supporting growth and keeping you focused on <PERSON>.\n\nRespectfully, we disagree on what the Church is. The Protestant belief is an invisible church of all believers, Apostolic Churches believe in a visible Church, the Church Militant and in heaven the mystical Church Triumphant. I won't debate that as it won't be fruitful. I am answering your question.\n\nEDIT: Corrected autocorrect errors and added a bit more.", "320" ], [ "> Would you mind explaining why that is. I though the Eucharist was pretty straight forward all around.\n\nWe're not all in communion with each other. To partake of communion means to affirm everything that ecclesial body holds as doctrine. Also, Catholics believe in the Real Presence, that the bread and wine become the Body and Blood of Christ.\n\nSome Protestants believe so too like Anglicans and Lutherans but with the latter the theology is different.\n\nIn Orthodoxy it's similar to Anglicans and Catholicism save for the method of how the Holy Gifts become the Body and Blood. One must not partake in an unworthy manner or it may eat or drink judgment on oneself.", "320" ], [ "I go with the Apostles who were taught by <PERSON> and the Church Fathers, a lot of whom weren't Western. I'm not a Western Christian although you sound exactly like a fringe group of Western Christianity. You seem to be upset going by the amount of insults.\n\n > instead opting for someone else to do it for them on Sunday morning, and barely listen, of course, and retain little knowledge, as Sunday afternoon is reserved for gossip between the members. This is your typical Sunday service. \n\nYou've never been to Divine Liturgy. You're coming from a Western mindset that the sermon is the center of worship when it never was until a couple hundred years ago.\n\n > And Latin Jesu.\n\nNo, it is <PERSON> actually. I used to go to dabble in Latin.\n\n > I wasn't referring to any of these concepts, you brought them up. \n\nI brought them up because those are Eastern Christian faiths that do not observe the Jewish Sabbath. I also happen to belong to a Greek Parish.\n\n > And it matters because it shows the latent sloth and laziness of the Western mind (and tongue) that everything has to be Western to be valid (Christianity included).\n\nDon't know why you're ranting at me. Not a Western Christian.\n\n > You think you can create a Western <PERSON>? With light features? It's a fantasy. He was a middle eastern man, with dark features, and nothing like is displayed in those graven images on Church walls (or houses).\n\nYou don't know anything about Eastern Christianity and ignore when people talk to you. He's portrayed as olive skinned which is what He was/is. You are too into Western Christianity.\n\nGraven images are worshiped. Eastern Christian Icons are not worshiped.\n\n > But if you're an anglocentric, of course that wouldn't be something you'd know, since English is King for anglophonic people. \n\nMy Church uses koine Greek.\n\n > The truth however is Hebrew is the main language that matters (and not English). \n\n*shrug* There is no Jew or Greek in <PERSON>.\n\n > And Sabbath is not legalistic, it is just the Sabbath, you either follow the commandment or you don't. \n\nI do in <PERSON>.\n\n > and then Catholic Church (horrible examples of Christians) \n\nJudgmental.\n\n > And you can quote the right Sabbath verses, but if you don't actually practice the Sabbath, you are profaning it. It's all talk, with no walk. \n\nI'm not Jewish.\n\nMuch rant, little truth. Have a blessed day. I hope you research Eastern Christianity one day.\n\nWe're done here. No more replies since you're resorting to insults and condemnations which means you already lost, not that there are winners or losers.", "703" ], [ "> What are the differences between those three church’s that the Apostolic church beliefs in.\n\nIt's a bit much for me to put here. You can always ask r/OrthodoxChristianity though.\n\n > So what is the overall stance of those church’s on the Protestant church.\n\nThere is no one Protestant church. It is a sect of denominations. We believe that they have some truth but not the full truth and perhaps prepare those in them for receiving the full truth. We know where the Holy Spirit is, we do not where He is not.\n\n > Because I’m not part of the Orthodox Church would I still be considered a born again Christian in your view?\n\nThat concept isn't exactly used.\n\nWe are born again at baptism and receive the Holy Spirit and are sealed with the Holy Spirit at Chrismation by laying on of hands of our Priest.\n\nWe live a life of Sanctification, the fruits of faith being partaking in the Sacraments which transmit God's grace, obedience to God with His grace, and good works by His grace. Salvation isn't one and done, it's a process cooperating with God's grace.\n\nWe are saved at baptism (Justification). We are being saved (Sanctification). We hope to be saved in the end (Glorification).", "320" ], [ "I would say that you need to be Catechized to learn about Christianity. That may help you to articulate different views.\n\nNone of us can earn heaven. Faith will have the natural fruit of works but works themselves will not get us to be in communion with God in the end. We become God the Father's adopted children through faith and baptism.\n\nI of course recommend [Orthodoxy](_URL_0_), one of the four ancient Apostolic Churches. If you have any questions, please visit r/OrthodoxChristianity.", "320" ], [ "> Contending knowledge is earthly and devilish. God finds humility gratifying. Anyways the entire Original post was evidence, my brother acts the exact same way with this belief, was fed by churches now can't break it.\n\nTake your own advice as you are not a learned theologian nor do you have the knowledge or humility to proclaim such things. Far wiser by far than you have affirmed the Holy Trinity. Taking some layman's word (yours) isn't smart.\n\nThis thread is a month old so I'm going to retire my comment tree. Have a nice day. :) If you were so invested in the conversation you would have replied before a month.", "951" ], [ "There is nothing you can do that will take away God's love for you, He is all forgiving and all merciful. If you have shown contrite or perfectly contrite repentance (repentance because of fear of losing God, not fear of Hell), God has heard you. Once God forgives a sin, it is forgotten. You now need to let go of your guilt (it will be a long process) as you're now clean in His eyes of that sin. This isn't to say, as you can guess, that we should go and sin all over the place. No, because that wouldn't be contrite and would be abuse of God's mercy, love, and kindness.\n\nIt seems to me, a mere laywoman, that you are sorrowful, contrite (only God and you know if you're perfectly contrite), and realize the extreme wrong that you have done in the eyes of God and your unborn child who awaits in Heaven for you. <PERSON> forgave all multitudes of sin on this earth when He walked upon it and still does; you are among them. Know what you have done, forgive yourself as He has forgiven you.\n\nI recommend if you're Orthodox or Catholic to confess to your Confessor for absolution ASAP and also have a general counselling session if you can. If you are not, then please see your minister ASAP for counseling and if you need to, a Christian counselor who specializes in these things. Talking it out is a huge help!\n\nYou deserve to live as you are His beloved adopted daughter, and He believes that you are worthy. None of us are worthy of His all powerful mercy and love but He gives it anyway. The only thing we can do is push His mercy and grace away (which could end us up in a state of Hell), which it doesn't seem that you're doing. Let Him give you His mercy and grace.\n\nMay God Bless you and yours. 💕\n\nPlease keep us informed on your progress!", "951" ], [ "> I mean in regards to marijuana the LDS church opposes all mind altering substances. Alcohol, caffeine, they even used to oppose any hot beverages like hot cocoa lol. So their opposition to marijuana isn't surprising.\n\nLDS aren't forbidden from consuming caffeine just coffee, tea, and alcohol. They can, for instance, drink sodas and energy drinks. They never opposed hot cocoa just tea and coffee since that was more known back then when the rule was put into effect.", "382" ], [ "> In fairness they do a lot of good aid work, it's not as if some shareholders or CEO is making bank off of tithes and business enterprises in the name of the LDS Church.\n\nThey could donate more to aid relief given how much they're worth. The truth is that most of the tithing money goes to SLC HQ from the stakes, from the wards. LDS are basically forced to tithe or no temple recommend. But again because they are not transparent with their finances we can't know the exact number, but we do know that the bulk of tithing goes to SLC HQ. They are also highly encouraged to do fast offerings which stay at ward level usually. So, this all coupled with their other ways of making money means that they could afford a lot more towards charity and relief efforts, and still afford that $17,000 rug in the temple.\n\n > Their finances are not relevant\n\nTheir finances are relevant when they could be helping more people, and be open and more honest with their benefactors, tithe prayers, etc.", "974" ], [ "> And, if you will notice, many of their temples and wards are located in or near wealthy neighborhoods.\n\nAt least as far as the temples go it makes sense since they require that 10% of one's paycheck be given to them in order to have the privilege of entering the temple.\n\nIt makes sense with the wards too since they're more likely to get the 10% they require from the rich than from the poor.", "384" ], [ "> Yes being a good person by doing good works and following the 10 commandments etc.\n\nOnly God is good.\n\nHave you read the *Catechism of the Catholic Church*?\n\n > But again, I’m a catholic yes, but as a Christian I believe that any person of any denomination can go to Heaven. The Pope has said this and I never have met a catholic that thinks otherwise\n\nThe Pope's words are often misinterpreted. He is an orthodox Catholic and he goes by doctrine/dogma and teachings of the Church which stands by what I have stated, that the Catholic Church is necessary, that being Catholic in good standing is necessary. It is the usual way of Salvation through Christ. As an aside, not everything a Pope says is infallible. We must stick to the teachings of the Magisterium.\n\nSadly, most Catholics are poorly Catechized and do not know their Faith as they should. If they read the Catechism and a companion they will know their Faith better.", "320" ], [ "> Bowing is worshipping, the devil told <PERSON> to bow down and he said NO, because he only bows to the Lord his GOD.\n\nPeople bow to each other as greeting in Japan. Do they worship each other?\n\n > Not a fan, just seems like an excuse no offense\n\nAnd you seem to look for excuses to continue your anti-Catholic bigotry. No offense.\n\n > Ignorant of the religion maybe, but not of the pagan practices\n\nNow you have to go there. First off, Catholicism is a Christian Faith. Secondly, they aren't pagan as back then even the pagans were put off by Catholics. Thirdly, if you're going to act rude like you have here why continue to converse? You reject everything truthful I have painstakingly written because your anti-Catholicism is so deeply ingrained, example being the 2nd commandment thing which you won't budge on.", "320" ], [ "> maybe, but i can't ignore pagan practices of worshipping <PERSON>..\n\nYou need to stop bearing false witness right now. You're antagonizing and attacking us all. You have no idea what you are even talking about. We tell you what we believe and do, and you need to accept it instead of causing discord by continuing to perpetuate your myths of your ingrained ideas of what Catholics do. Enough is enough!", "754" ], [ "> Do you know anyone that drinks coffee or tea?\n\nI drink tea because I like the flavor. I stay away from soda except once in awhile and also stay away from sugary juices and other drinks. Because of that, my health is better.\n\n\nI only drink hot coffee at my Parish's socials and other functions because I like the flavor.\n\nI like the taste of mocha too (hence my username) and drink it for that, not caffeine.\n\n > The addictive qualities of these drinks are why I think they are advised against.\n\nCaffeine is not why those drinks are forbidden for you all otherwise soda would be forbidden too. It can be addictive and used to stay awake like coffee.", "1002" ], [ "> Ok, why are they forbidden then? Shits and giggles?\n\nI don't know. I guess to you guys it's just obedience.\n\n > Were the Latter-Day Saints smashing back Coke and Redbull? Is that what fueled religious fervor then?\n\nThere's a legend behind why it was included as part of the WoW but the LDS answer is that it just is because <PERSON> said so. It has nothing to do with caffeine.\n\nAre they now smashing back Coke and Red Bull? No doubt.", "754" ], [ "> And since you are (presumably) NOT a Returned Missionary, you would have been about as desirable as used toilet paper. Those gals have REALLY been conditioned to go all-out for an RM.\n\nCan confirm. My husband was LDS all of his life until 30 and no LDS women would date him because he was not a Returned Missionary. He gave 10 years of service to his YA ward with two callings and nada. He was strongly discouraged from dating outside of the LDS (it broke us up at 16) and so remained single until 29 when he said screw it and dated the woman he'd been wanting to date for 13 years who is proudly never-Mo despite his ward's higher ups not wanting him to.", "193" ], [ "> I don't do anything just to obey. There's more to everything than just that. Latter-Day Saints doing that in opinion wom't have much of an argument when someone challenges them and the WoW. There's too much depth to WoW to just say \"oh, idk, I do it because God says so?\"\n\nWhen I've asked, the answer has been obedience or false notions of health concerns which don't pan out. It doesn't seem like there's depth to the WoW, just don't do this or that..and cherry picking like eating meat sparingly which the majority of LDS don't do. If the WoW is supposedly a health guide with its dietary restrictions, sugar should have been included in there.", "261" ], [ "> the true ten commandments has the verse about idols, notice how many statues and images are in a catholic church. Catholics \"seperate\" the 9th into 2 commandments, getting them back to \"10\".\n\n**Exodus 20:3-17 (Revised Standard Version 2nd Catholic Edition):**\n\n* 3 *\"You shall have no other gods before me.*\n* 4 *\"You shall not make for yourself a graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth;*\n* 5 *you shall not bow down to them or serve them; for I the LORD your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me,*\n* 6 *but showing mercy to thousands of those who love me and keep my commandments.*\n* 7 *\"You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain.*\n*8 *\"Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.*\n* 9 *Six days you shall labor, and do all your work;*\n* 10 *but the seventh day is a sabbath to the LORD your God; in it you shall not do any work, you, or your son, or your daughter, your manservant, or your maidservant, or your cattle, or the sojourner who is within your gates;*\n* 11 *for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day; therefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day and hallowed it.*\n* 12 *\"Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long in the land which the LORD your God gives you.*\n* 13 *\"You shall not kill.*\n* 14 *\"You shall not commit adultery.*\n* 15 *\"You shall not steal.*\n* 16 *\"You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.*\n* 17 *\"You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, or his manservant, or his maidservant, or his ox, or his donkey, or anything that is your neighbor's.\"*\n\nYou should pay more attention to verse 16.\n\nAdding:\n\n**Exodus 20:3-5 (Douay-Rheims Challoner Version):**\n\n* 3 *Thou shalt not have strange gods before me.*\n* 4 *Thou shalt not make to thyself a graven thing, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, nor of those things that are in the waters under the earth.*\n* 5 *Thou shalt not adore them, nor serve them: I am the Lord thy God, mighty, jealous, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me:*\n\n**Exodus 20:3-5 (New American Bible Revised Edition):** This is a Catholic Bible as well.\n\n* 3 *You shall not have other gods beside me.*\n* 4 *You shall not make for yourself an idol or a likeness of anything in the heavens above or on the earth below or in the waters beneath the earth;*\n* 5 *you shall not bow down before them or serve them.d For I, the LORD, your God, am a jealous God, inflicting punishment for their ancestors’ wickedness on the children of those who hate me, down to the third and fourth*", "649" ], [ "> bit of confusion here-- i don't read catholic bibles so can't discern a difference between them. how is it that you find a commandment missing when searching on google but yours has the original 10? Different branches?\n\nPerhaps it's because you only look for anti-Catholic sites. There are 24 churches in the Catholic Church however you are referring to the Latin/Roman church only and I am copying from Bibles used in the Latin/Roman Catholic church. The oldest is the Vulgate which has the graven images commandment. The second oldest that I used in my comment was from the 1700s.", "320" ], [ "The *Catechism of the Catholic Church* (CCC) has an entire section on Baptism:\n\n_URL_0_\n\nThis is a summary of the section though I would recommend reading the whole section.\n\nCCC 1275 *Christian initiation is accomplished by three sacraments together: Baptism which is the beginning of new life; Confirmation which is its strengthening; and the Eucharist which nourishes the disciple with Christ's Body and Blood for his transformation in Christ.*\n\nCCC 1276 *\"Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you\" (Mt 28:19-20).*\n\nCCC 1277 *Baptism is birth into the new life in Christ. In accordance with the Lord's will, it is necessary for salvation, as is the Church herself, which we enter by Baptism.*\n\nCCC 1278 *The essential rite of Baptism consists in immersing the candidate in water or pouring water on his head, while pronouncing the invocation of the Most Holy Trinity: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.*\n\nCCC 1279 *The fruit of Baptism, or baptismal grace, is a rich reality that includes forgiveness of original sin and all personal sins, birth into the new life by which man becomes an adoptive son of the Father, a member of Christ and a temple of the Holy Spirit. By this very fact the person baptized is incorporated into the Church, the Body of Christ, and made a sharer in the priesthood of Christ.*\n\nCCC 1280 *Baptism imprints on the soul an indelible spiritual sign, the character, which consecrates the baptized person for Christian worship. Because of the character Baptism cannot be repeated (cf. DS 1609 and DS 1624).*\n\nCCC 1281 *Those who die for the faith, those who are catechumens, and all those who, without knowing of the Church but acting under the inspiration of grace, seek God sincerely and strive to fulfill his will, can be saved even if they have not been baptized (cf. LG 16).*\n\nCCC 1282 *Since the earliest times, Baptism has been administered to children, for it is a grace and a gift of God that does not presuppose any human merit; children are baptized in the faith of the Church. Entry into Christian life gives access to true freedom.*\n\nCCC 1283 *With respect to children who have died without Baptism, the liturgy of the Church invites us to trust in God's mercy and to pray for their salvation.*\n\nCCC 1284 *In case of necessity, any person can baptize provided that he have the intention of doing that which the Church does and provided that he pours water on the candidate's head while saying: \"I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.\"*", "649" ], [ "> he was god's first born. If <PERSON> is god then how did he cry to himself? If that was his \"human mode\", then you're no longer a trinitarian. you're a modalist at that point. <PERSON> also calls <PERSON> the ONE TRUE GOD. he can't lie.\n\nNot only would that be Modalism but Nestorianism.\n\nThough <PERSON> is the ONLY begotten Son of God, He was/is the Word of God who has existed with the Father eternally as we see from John 1. He was begotten in the flesh by the Father through the Holy Spirit but still has a dual nature of true Man and true God.\n\nHe prayed to His Father because They are not the same Divine Person even if They share the same essence/substance of the one God. The Father is the one true God, as is <PERSON>, and the Holy Spirit. Therefore <PERSON> did not lie.", "649" ], [ "I found out about our estranged brethren, the Eastern Orthodox, and that if I wasn't convinced by Catholicism would have to begome Ordodox.\n\nI also found out about the Eastern Catholic churches. I'm leaning towards looking into becoming a Byzantine Catholic, as I'm currently in RCIA right now, but I'm too shy and scared to do it much less attend a Divine Liturgy, since I've been told repeatedly that I have to become Latin Rite Catholic if I become Catholic. I'm part Slovakian descent but-- *shrug* What do I know?", "703" ], [ "> As a Catholic you can attend and receive communion at a Catholic church of any rite. You don't ever have to formally switch rites at all unless you want to be ordained to the clergy in a church of that rite. Just attending Divine Liturgy (whether it's once or for the rest of your life) doesn't require anything of the sort\n\nI'm still in the process of converting. I might just continue into the Latin church and do that, attend Divine Liturgy as well as Mass.", "703" ], [ "> Yeah. That's because the Latins hate the eastern church. I lived it first hand when I was one. Going orthodox was the best thing I've ever done. An eastern catholic friend of mine is marrying a Roman. Her roman church spread rumours that they weren't Christian. You're getting into a world of incompatible theology and worldviews. Western imperialism is forever. Always being told you need the filioque, that your leavened bread is wrong, that you should speak Latin in divine liturgy. They want to do the same abuses they did in old Ruthenia.\n\nIn my experience being around the Latin church I've never heard anything negative. I've only heard that unleavened bread should be used in the Mass. Perhaps things have changed. At any rate, I think I might just continue into the Latin Rite.", "703" ], [ "> \"Throughout the years, the Catholic Church encouraged Bible reading, but kept control of the interpretation of the Bible as part of the Church’s inspired authority to teach the truth and preserve the unity of the Church.\"\n\nThat's how to keep from having many conflicting interpretations where all interpreters claim to have the Holy Spirit guide them. That just isn't logical or true. The Magisterium (Extraordinary and Ordinary) helps to guide the person to the truth by the power of the Holy Spirit instead of the person injecting their own biases and modernity.", "320" ], [ "> a google search of catholic 10 commandments, you saying that google hates catholics?\n\nI thought we settled this. You are obviously only looking for anti-Catholic sites, as evidenced by the one you keep posting all over this post's comments section. I have provided you with evidence and Google searched as well and find the same thing I relayed to you from my own digital Bibles.\n\nHere's an excerpt from pretty much the oldest Catholic Bible, from the 5th century, for what is now Exodus 20:3-5 (there weren't chapter numbers or verse numbers then): (This is from _URL_0_)\n\n* 3 *non habebis deos alienos coram me* (Thou shalt not have strange gods before me.)\n* 4 *non facies tibi sculptile neque omnem similitudinem quae est in caelo desuper et quae in terra deorsum nec eorum quae sunt in aquis sub terra* (Thou shalt not make to thyself a graven thing, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, nor of those things that are in the waters under the earth.)\n* 5 *non adorabis ea neque coles ego sum Dominus Deus tuus fortis zelotes visitans iniquitatem patrum in filiis in tertiam et quartam generationem eorum qui oderunt me* (Thou shalt not adore them, nor serve them: I am the Lord thy God, mighty, jealous, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me:)\n\nEDIT: Changed sources from _URL_2_ to _URL_1_ due to possible copyright issues with the former.", "320" ], [ "> John 1-1 is better translated as \"And the word was as god was!\" meaning that <PERSON> was as god was; perfect. This was not a COMPLETE translation but it was another way that the verse COULD be translated.\n\nHaving taken a look at the Koine Greek (not modern Greek), I doubt that can be ascertained. The Jehovah's Witnesses have more credence than your claim and they translate it as, \"And the Word was a god\".\n\nSorry but your explanations don't really make sense given the way the Koine Greek translates. We can ascertain that the Word was God or that God was the Word. Looser translation can translate it as \"a god\" due to the lack of an article.", "649" ], [ "> art of graven images of <PERSON> who will presumably go to heaven\n\nOh my goodness.. You and other iconoclasts mistake graven images for any bloody statue or icon! Graven image means an idol which means it's bloody well worshiped..which the statues and icons are **NOT** worshiped! They..are..not..graven..images.\n\nWhat the heck are you even talking about in the last part? That makes no sense \"who will presumably go to heaven\"..who will presumably go to heaven?", "821" ], [ "Did <PERSON> scold the woman who used her expensive perfumed ointment to anoint <PERSON>'s head as she also washed his feet with her tears and dried his feet with her hair? No! He took it as her sincere devotion to Him even though as the Pharisee pointed out that the ointment could have been sold for a hefty sum to feed the poor. <PERSON> still took this gesture she made to Him, this worship. That is what Catholics and Orthodox do with beautiful vestments, icons, statues, beautiful churches..they use it to glorify God.", "703" ], [ "> I know a priest is supposed to bless the Eucharist.\n\nHe doesn't merely bless it, he consecrates it.\n\n > But in unexpected scenarios is there a reason to not participate in the body of Christ?\n\nThe Catholic Church is the Body of Christ.\n\n > And I would disagree in saying the Eucharist is the source and Summit of our faith.\n\nIt is literally the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Christ, God the Son. So it is because it is linked to that moment on Mount Calvary.\n\n > The source of our faith is God the Father and the summit is Christ's death on the cross.\n\nThe Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are God. Christ in the Flesh and Blood is the source and summit of the Christian Faith.", "703" ], [ "I am actually about to purchase some headscarves for Divine Liturgy! We veil what is precious, what is set aside for God. I see head covering (not face) as submission to God. Women are not obligated to cover, however, she honors God when she does with this practice of humility and dedication. I highly recommend it for all women. <PERSON> is in the Flesh and Blood in the Divine Liturgy/Mass/Holy Qurbana as well as in the tabernacle! We do not have to cover outside of Divine Liturgy/Mass/Holy Qurbana however some women feel a calling to do this. It is a devotion to God either way and those feeling called should heed the call.", "972" ], [ "> IMO, having one's head uncovered is more respectful than having it covered.\n\nI know you aren't an orthodox Catholic, but maybe you should listen to women who cover and why we do it. We do it out of love for God, submission, devotion, humility, and lastly our femininity. He is present in the Eucharist so we ought to humble ourselves. As well we do it because we are precious in the eyes of God and what is precious is veiled.\n\nHere's a primer: _URL_0_\n\nYou can't let your secular cultural norms dictate your worship of God. He is beyond mere American culture.\n\n > Men are supposed to have their heads uncovered during Mass.\n\nYou are not a man therefore why treat yourself like one? We are different than men, there is no disputing that even if we have equal dignity. Man and woman are complementary.\n\n > Why are women somehow lesser than men?\n\nSo covering makes one less than a man? That's just ludicrous. We are different! The link I posted explains.", "703" ], [ "> Why not use Saturday as a day of rest and solitary/family prayer, and Sunday for fellowship and community worship?\n\nTo Catholic and Orthodox Christians Sunday is a day we rest in Christ (everyday we rest in Christ as well) and meet with Him in the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity (also in Third Hour Prayer for Byzantine Catholics and daily Mass for Latin Catholics). We don't have the same outlook on fellowship as Protestants do that church is a social time as well as worship. We are a community of prayer as the Divine Liturgy/Mass/Holy Qurbana is a prayer where we are in Christ's literal Presence.\n\nEveryday should be a day of solitary prayer and family prayer.", "703" ], [ "> if one committed the act of adultery, and even though they are working everything out with their spouse, what happens with that concept of marriage?\n\nThey're still married.\n\n > Does that holy sacrament cease to exist or is it destroyed?\n\nIt can't be destroyed.\n\n > but is that marriage still a marriage in the eyes of the Lord or is it a flawed and ruined thing?\n\nIf it was a valid marriage before the adultery it's still a valid marriage after the adultery.", "83" ], [ "From [*Catechism of the Catholic Church* (CCC)](_URL_0_):\n\n2291 *The use of drugs inflicts very grave damage on human health and life. Their use, except on strictly therapeutic grounds, is a grave offense. Clandestine production of and trafficking in drugs are scandalous practices. They constitute direct co-operation in evil, since they encourage people to practices gravely contrary to the moral law.*\n\nIt is best to be sober.", "615" ], [ "> But since he will be the one earning all the money he has a right to at least know what I'm spending his/our money on and limit it if necessary.\n\nYou have the same right. Let's say he's bad with money..do you not have a right to limit his spending to keep your finances positive? Yes, you do. It's not HIS money, it's BOTH your money. We are to be complementary with our husbands, not voluntary or involuntary slaves. If he truly is going to be the head of the household, he shouldn't be controlling or limiting to you as you wouldn't to him. It's a complementary partnership.", "312" ], [ "> He is the father.\n\n > Yes to all theee questions. Can baptize in holy sprit in the name of <PERSON>\n\nI don't quite understand what you're saying as you're not clear.\n\nIs God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit or is God just the Father? Christians believe that He is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Three Divine Persons of one God. We baptize in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.", "649" ], [ "I defend the Christians living in Israel and Palestine, and those being downtrodden as well. I also, in spirit, defend the Christian Holy Sites in Israel.\n\nDo I support Israel? I believe it has a right to exist but not to the detriment of those in the Gaza Strip. Palestinians too have a right to exist. I don't agree with either's governments, I side with the afflicted, the innocent.\n\nThose who blindly support the State of Israel no matter what do so because they believe this is the Israel of the Bible. The land may be the same, sure, that's why we should protect the Holy Sites. Other than that, it's not the Israel of the Bible and therefore up to scrutiny just like any other State.", "677" ], [ "I started out as a non-denominational Protestant not of the Baptist variety, then I went to join the Catholic Church as a Roman Catholic after going to Mass on and off for 15 years, and 3 years later I'm now going to be joining the Catholic Church as a Byzantine Catholic. Eastern theology makes much more sense than the Western and I love the Liturgy more as well and just everything..I can't put it into words very well.\n\nProtestant -- > Roman Catholic Candidate for Confirmation -- > Byzantine Catholic in the near future!\n\nI'll also add that Catholicism taught me more about Christianity than my former Protestant community ever did. For that I'm thankful.", "320" ], [ "Here's the [*Catechism of the Catholic Church* (CCC)](_URL_0_) on the Death Penalty:\n\n2267 *Assuming that the guilty party's identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor.*\n\n*If, however, non-lethal means are sufficient to defend and protect people's safety from the aggressor, authority will limit itself to such means, as these are more in keeping with the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in conformity to the dignity of the human person.*\n\n*Today, in fact, as a consequence of the possibilities which the state has for effectively preventing crime, by rendering one who has committed an offense incapable of doing harm - without definitely taking away from him the possibility of redeeming himself - the cases in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity \"are very rare, if not practically non-existent.\"*", "178" ], [ "> You notice how many posting around here is about talks of \"Spirit of Vatican II\", \"Go to latin mass\", \"Fr Z\" / \"Fr <PERSON>\", \"Sensus Fidelius\", \"Veiling\"? They are all talks of Traditional Catholics -- the desire to Go back to the time before 1962 (or 1955)\n\nSome of us are proponents for Divine Liturgy. :)\n\nCovering/veiling is not a woman wanting to be back before 1983 (when the Roman church's new CIC was adopted and the 1917 CIC's requirement for covering was dropped in the new CIC), it's her having total submission to God and reverence for Him in the Flesh and Blood whether she's Latin Rite, Byzantine Rite, Maronite Rite, etc. You can look down on us who cover and make up your excuses on why we do it, and even call us traddies or rad trads to shame us but we'll continue to do it as we feel called to do it. We don't cover for people, we cover for God. If people don't like it, that's their problem not ours.\n\nAlso, there's nothing wrong with Latin Catholics and Eastern Catholics wanting to keep to the ancient Faith instead of having it broken apart by modern things.", "703" ], [ "When I go to a Roman Catholic Mass (NO or TLM) I wear a veil. At Divine Liturgy a scarf is more suitable than a Mantilla. There's some women who cover and most don't but I don't let that bother me because covering is between God and myself and no one should have any say over it. Plus <PERSON> is in the Flesh and Blood! You should cover if you feel that you ought to to show the utmost reverence to God and submission to Him. May God Bless you!", "703" ], [ "> The celibacy of priests, for example. I think it's an unfair characterization to say that someone who desires to change that (and to be clear, I don't have an opinion on it) isn't \"assenting to the Church's teachings,\"\n\nFrom my three years here hardly anyone mistakenly says that is doctrine. It's a discipline. Also, Eastern Catholic Priests can be married before ordination.\n\nYou know very well that I am speaking to doctrine and dogma, not discipline.", "320" ], [ "> I know very well that if someone came in here advocating for priests to get married, they'd get downvoted to hell.\n\nWell, that's because Priests can't get married..they can be married before ordination (and in the Latin Rite if the discipline is lifted), sure. You made it sound like in your previous reply that you meant Priests being married already. Two different things. One would not be orthodox.", "83" ], [ "> It can if the Church changes the rules someday, which is literally possible, because it's not Dogma. The Church has deliberated on it a number of times. It is, as Pope <PERSON> has said, a matter of \"discipline, not of faith.\"\n\nThe whole article is about men being married BEFORE Ordination which is what I said was a discipline in the Latin Rite! You just backed up what I said already. Eastern Catholic Priests, as I said, can be married before Ordination already. It's a Latin Rite discipline to not allow Priests to be married before Ordination (and even then convert Priests can be married before). The Eastern Rites have married Priests.", "83" ], [ "> Changing the celibacy rule of priests — which is a rule, and not dogma — is possible.\n\nPRIESTS CANNOT MARRY IN ANY CATHOLIC CHURCH.\n\nMEN WHO ARE MARRIED CAN BECOME PRIESTS IF THE DISCIPLINE IS LIFTED. EASTERN CATHOLIC PRIESTS CAN BE MARRIED PRE-ORDINATION.\n\nThe article you posted was about men being married BEFORE Ordination which is not what I'm talking about!! YOU are talking about single men being Ordained and then marrying which can't happen.\n\nGet it now?", "83" ], [ "> Also, there are already married priests under the current discipline, in the Latin Rite, if you didn't know.\n\nI already said that in my post before last! Do you not know how to listen? You are talking about single men being Ordained and then marrying whereas I'm talking about married men being Ordained.\n\nDo you not know the difference between men already married being Ordained which is a discipline, and single men being Ordained and then marry which is not allowed?\n\nI feel like I'm being trolled.\n\nAre you reading my comments even?", "83" ], [ "> You didn't address my statement towards the end of my post. Will <PERSON> allow him that overcomes, to sit in His throne?\n\nI searched your posts, that wasn't included as a question. That would be consistent with the Beatific Vision in Heaven. It does not mean becoming a god of one's own, however as there is one God, no other gods.\n\nI guess you guys changed your doctrine or teachings again because last I checked you all believed in getting your own planet and having spirit children. My husband was LDS and his family still are.\n\n > Yet that wasn't what he wrote.\n\nAgain, since he was not a henotheist it's safe to say that what Mormons erroneously think he said isn't what was meant..or else we'd have believed the same conclusion since the beginning since the Catholic Church has been around since then.\n\nAgain, as it says in the Catholic Answers article which is orthodox Catholic teaching, that usually has <PERSON> in their articles, by the way, not just a random article on the internet, the word used for \"gods\" could also be rendered \"deified\" as the Greek allows for that thus making it partakers in divine nature such as in the Beatific Vision. Again, given St. <PERSON>' belief in the Trinity he would not believe in more gods. And again, since the Church was around then had he meant what Mormons think he would have been deemed a heretic, or in heresy.\n\nYou can hop over to r/Catholicism to discuss this as many would be willing to help and we have theologians as well.", "320" ], [ "> sects of Christianity will recognize one another as at least forces for the cause of God, rather than obstacles to it.\n\nIt's rather unlikely that the Apostolic Churches, including my own, will ever see LDS (and the like) as Christians unless you guys begin professing the Nicene/Niceno-Constantinopolitano Creed (the summary and core of Christian Faith) and believe in the triune God. As it is we don't accept baptisms from your community even though we accept 98% of baptisms from the Protestant sect. Baptism incorporates one into the Body of Christ, and in an imperfect communion with the Catholic Church, if the baptism is done outside of her. You guys aren't in any communion. My husband, thank God, will be baptized next year as he left the LDS in 2015.", "320" ], [ "> This. Facebook does not have a physical person reviewing every item that has been reported. Mistakes do and will happen.\n\nTell me about it. I've reported death threats before against others and Facebook comes back that it does not violate their community standards. I've also reported pornographic pictures and the same thing happens, yet things that do not violate their community standards such as honest negative restaurant reviews that stick to facts only and no slander or libel gets me nearly banned from Facebook.", "611" ], [ "That does not say that they are assured heaven, it just says who is or isn't considered Christian.\n\nCatholicism does teach that being Catholic is important because she is the Church of Christ and has the Sacraments that confer His graces namely the Sacrament of Reconciliation, but does acknowledge that maybe some outside of full communion may be saved with perfect contrition and being ignorant of the Church through no fault of their own (if in imperfect communion). For those in no communion if they do as God has written into the natural heart of man and seek Him perhaps they would be saved too.", "320" ], [ "> You didn’t really respond to the rest of my points which pointed out a lot of things that supported my view point.\n\nI didn't see a point since it was reiteration of the same opinion with different wording. I don't feel well and felt it was best to move onto something fresh. I will side with the Church because of the logic and, most importantly, because it is God's will, even though I can understand that you have your doubts.\n\n > People are allowed to have different opinions and feelings.\n\nSure you can but you must assent and not teach that contraception is okay in certain circumstances. To teach that it is okay is to go against the Church.\n\n > You’re saying I’m being overly sympathetic. I don’t think there’s such a thing.\n\nThere is. Just look at the SJWs. I'm not saying you are one, but they are an example of over sensitivity and too much sympathy. It clouds judgment.\n\n > I’ll pray for you to come off as more understanding one day.\n\nNow *that* is holier than thou. I was merely trying to explain rationally to you. You would accuse me once again that I'm \"holier than thou\" if I ended my comment with \"I pray you one day see the logic and truth of the Church\". I'm not going to.\n\nI'm understanding, however, logically speaking the Church has made her decision and it must be assented to by all the Faithful and the contrary not be taught. Contraception is not allowed. I don't see a point in harboring a contrary opinion since it's futile and also as well it's logical to be against contraception even if I weren't of a Catholic mindset.\n\nAnywho, any further discourse with you won't change your mind about something the Church says you must assent to. If you must accuse any opposition of being holier than thou, so be it. Peace.\n\nEDIT: Fixed typos and added stuff.", "529" ], [ "> SJWs, are you like a <PERSON> supporter or something?\n\nNot that it's any of your business but no. You assume I'm American. Yes, I am, but best not to assume. I'm neither Left nor Right in American politics. Even those on the Left get tired of them.\n\n > Those terms are complete irrelvant \n\nThey are relevant because people get tired of them.\n\n > Makes sense why you are in black and white.\n\nNot everything is.\n\n > If you don't see the point in harboring a contrary opinion? You might be the most self righteous catholic I've met on the internet.\n\nIf you must call me that, so be it. I'm actually a Candidate in RCIA, though. If you think I'm bad, you've haven't been around here long. I'm mild compared to some.\n\nYou cannot teach contrary to the Church's hard teachings, doctrine and dogma. It creates the sin of scandal and can lead others to sin.\n\n > I'm just saying I think the catholic church got it wrong, and there was a majority of bishops who voted on the matter who agreed with the opinion I held.\n\nSo you believe the Church of Christ is wrong on matters of Faith and Morals. That's prideful.\n\nQuite a few Bishops now believe gay marriage should be allowed in the Church. That does not make them right.\n\n > That might have been the most hostile peace I have ever been given.\n\nYou've been so throughout the exchange. It doesn't really bother me, I'm used to push back from those who think the Church should get with the times.\n\n > I hope you got something out of it as well.\n\nYes, you are closed to understanding the logic behind the prohibition of contraception and do nothing but double down. You accuse me of being closed minded (not that that's always a bad thing) but you are as well and cannot see it.\n\nGod Bless.\n\nEDIT: Added a little bit.", "754" ], [ "> And no wonder, youre not even a fully fledged catholic. I'd be warry about what you say.\n\nWhy? I speak truth. Others here who are full Catholic are more to point than I am.\n\n > to explain myself further, you're allowed as a catholic to DOUBT the faith, and other things of the church, it's a normal process of discernment as you go through the catholic rite.\n\nYou cannot teach contrary, however, it creates the sin of scandal.\n\nI've already been through RCIA. My discernment process is long gone.\n\n > And I also think you lack self awareness in this respect. If you think you are mild. You're clearly wrong.\n\nI'm aware but compared to others, as I swyped, I am mild. I never swyped that I am mild in general. Therefore, I'm correct. I'm to the point which is important in written exchanges.\n\n > No where in my arguments have I said directly the catholic church IS wrong, \n\nYou said that you believe that she is wrong on this.\n\n > It's funny how you keep pointing out that im closed minded,\n\nIt is funny that you do the same. Pot kettle.\n\n > you havent told me anything I didn't already know on the matter. \n\nLikewise.\n\n > Can you even summarize what I've been a proponent of anyways?\n\nIn a round about way you are a proponent of contraception for some situations. You try to reconcile that with trying to assent personally with the teachings.\n\nAnywho, God Bless.", "320" ], [ "> I don't believe we should be owning weapons because more guns in more hands means more deaths on our hands.\n\nAll the rifles I've met have never shot anyone and are used only on the range. They make bad home defense weapons because one has to put in the bolt and load the magazine to use it. It's faster to use something else.\n\nHandguns, on the other hand, are better for defense but a responsible owner having one doesn't necessarily mean more deaths.\n\nI own a sword but I'm not going out killing people and neither are the gun owners I know.\n\n > Bottom line, you don't shoot a gun to injure someone, you shoot a gun to kill them.\n\nActually, I'd shoot to disable, or strike with a melee weapon to disable.\n\nIt is important in a Godless society to have weaponry of some form against those who would due unjust harm to one's family.", "349" ], [ "> Now some body who has mental problem goes to Doctor and is prescribed with pills after pills but in <PERSON> time if he went to <PERSON> he would cast out the demon . There might be some physical aspect , Hormone etc ... but a lot of that is demonic. You should overcome the demonic influence and please watch <PERSON> videos and read his books.\n\nTIL that I'm possessed. Thanks qualified exorcist that had gone through exorcist training and knows what he/she is doing! Nevermind that this, from a theological perspective, is a result of the fall..man's choosing free will and all that comes with it.\n\nI think I'll skip the <PERSON> guy..something tells me he's no expert.\n\n > You have been processed by female demon and you need to cast it out.\n\nYou've been watching too much *Supernatural*. I love that show.\n\n > The attraction to same sex will go away. Unfortunately a lot of people are not aware of this warfare.\n\nIn some people it does, in a lot it doesn't. It's all brain chemistry stuff that's still being looked at by scientists.", "983" ], [ "> Remember not to shame him and to understand urges are natural and normal, especially at that age. It's so important you don't berate him and call him a evil sick sinner like some people do. Think to yourself how would <PERSON> handle this? with compassion and love. You don't have to agree on everything. This isn't something to break up over. It's soooo common. It'll be alright and trust me don't take it personally\n\nWhat about how it makes her feel? Just because an urge is \"natural\", it doesn't make it good and contrary to popular belief men can control themselves, they aren't lesser animals. They can even learn to not have those urges at all or hardly at all over time with control. Looking at pornography plus lusting and even masturbation are sins, grave sins. It is cheating as well. Why should a woman stand for a man who cheats? I wouldn't and she shouldn't have to. She should bring her concerns to him charitably and let her feelings be known. If they were to get married, this isn't acceptable behavior in a marriage and it's best that she find out now how he will deal with it before so she can determine if that's what she wants in a life time marriage. Shaming isn't always a bad thing, by the way, as long as it isn't extreme.", "901" ], [ "King <PERSON> was a foreshadowing, theophany as you say, of the coming of <PERSON> even offering up bread and wine in allusion to the institution of the Eucharist, the literal Body and Blood of Christ.\n\n<PERSON> is THE High Priest in the order (manner) of <PERSON> (there is no other High Priest, and all current and past Sacerdotal Priests (Catholic, Orthodox, the others with Succession) act *in Persona Christi\" in the Person of Christ, so in effect there is but one Priest now). Every Priest is in the order of <PERSON> (meaning 'in the manner of'). There is no other Priesthood (besides the Royal Priesthood, but that is different). The Levite (Aaronic) Priesthood is gone, the Sacerdotal Priesthood (order/manner of <PERSON>) has replaced it because it is of <PERSON>.", "703" ], [ "> So a prisoner who is doing life in prison in say China won't ever have a chance to be baptized, so by your logic he can never be saved even though he believes in <PERSON>.\n\nLogically speaking that would be baptism of desire, that is he could be baptized he would. By God's mercy he would be counted among the baptized.\n\n > Some say belileve and be baptized, but the majority say faith is all that's required.\n\nThe oldest Churches that were around when the NT was being written believe baptism was indeed necessary then and now.", "951" ], [ "> Ya idk what that is, it's not in the Bible.\n\nThat's the name of the thief, as I said if you read it. Do you have a better reply to what I wrote?\n\n > Baptism isn't a requirement\n\nIt's necessary, actually, and as I said the oldest Churches have always believed it since even before the NT was finished. Baptism incorporates one into the Body of Christ, into the New and Eternal Covenant.\n\nYour reply was rather empty.", "649" ], [ "> Where's the verse that he is givin a name?\n\nWe learn his name from this wonderful thing called history. You didn't address the rest of my paragraph about <PERSON> being God. Try to engage in the conversation, please. Here's the paragraph again:\n\n\"<PERSON> is God and God doesn't have to work through the ways that He has set up for us in the Sacraments, works of the Holy Spirit. He wished to save <PERSON>, the thief, and so He did. The usual way is baptism which is incorporation into the Body of Christ and confers His grace, belief, and obedience by God's grace.\"\n\n > It's not necessary, only faith is.\n\nGrace is necessary.", "649" ], [ "> If God wanted it to be how groups such as Catholics or Mormons teach,\n\nDon't compare us to Mormons, we believe in the triune God and profess the Nicene/Niceno-Constantinopolitano Creed (and our Church, as one with Orthodox and Coptic, was there at the drafting of such) whereas Mormons do not believe in the triune God or the core of Christianity; their religion is a 19th century invention.\n\nUp until the last few centuries Bible only wasn't a practice, the oldest Churches (Catholic, Orthodox, Coptic) have always had Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition balanced (which the latter helped determine the Biblical Canon in the 4th/5th centuries).\n\nMost of Christendom believes in Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition.\n\n > how people consider the Pope more important has more power?\n\nHuh?", "320" ], [ "> I'm not a Protestant\n\nYou believe in the 5 solas, therefore you are. We use Protestant to mean not of one of the four ancient Apostolic Churches, as those outside are in protest to these Churches. It is little different than reference to the Protestant Reformation where even non-denominationals are descended from.\n\n > Just because you have pride in Catholics doesn't mean there correct in there understanding if the Bible, I've already brought for more verses holding my argument up. Your just saying I know because Catholic, it's honestly seems pretty arrogant.\n\nCatholicism and Orthodoxy compiled the Biblical Canon and know how to interpret the verses having been there, having a teaching authority. You can call it arrogance but it's more logic.\n\n > Also you kinda ignored my point to talk about how much better you are.\n\nI'm sorry you feel that way. I say this all because I worry about those who think that believing is enough and they need not have any fruits for true Faith. You can say anything you want about me that makes you feel better, and I'll take it, but willfully not being baptized is a very dangerous thing.\n\nYour verses don't hold up to the traditional interpretations of those verses. I am not *sola scriptura* as Christendom is majority not and has not been.\n\nGod can do as He pleases but we generally have to follow the way He set up, graces through baptism, believing, fruits of true Faith that make good works..", "320" ], [ "> but I do still think I should give far more than I do.\n\nThen do as you say.\n\n > as staying in a same-sex monogamous relationship because a gay Christian doesn't want to be celibate.\n\nAll are to be celibate outside of marriage in my Faith. A lot don't want to be celibate. We all have to do things we don't want.\n\n > I'd say celibacy is a much bigger sacrifice than foregoing most luxuries.\n\nSpeaking as someone who's done both, I'd say it's a draw.\n\n > But unrepentant luxury buyers are treated with far more understanding, because more people have a desire for luxury than a desire for same-sex sexual relationships.\n\nNot in my Church.", "589" ], [ "> Faith, baptism is a public announcement of that faith. You get baptized because you believe, your faith is what saves you.\n\nPart of the core of Christian belief is that there is one baptism for the remission of sins. Baptism does save with Faith. It confers God's graces.\n\n > For what does the Scripture say? “A <PERSON> believed in (trusted, relied on) G od , and it was credited to his account as righteousness (right living, right standing with God).” ROMANS 4:3 AMP\n\nThat is reference to the Old Covenant, however being that it mentions <PERSON>.", "649" ], [ "> If your not trusting <PERSON> for salvation alone. And your trusting that your saved because you got baptized your kinda trusting in something you did to get saved. The Bible teaches we are trusting in <PERSON> alone for out salvation, where not trusting in baptism.\n\nI trust in Him because baptism is a work of God, nothing of man. I work out my Salvation in fear and trembling being baptized as was commanded in the name of the Father, and of the Son, of the Holy Spirit. I don't cherry pick verses like you do but put them together for the whole picture. As a verse says baptism now saves, I take it at face value instead of the erroneous thought that because X is said more then Y isn't important. That's missing the whole picture.", "951" ], [ "> I'm just arguing that when approaching the subject of gay Christians (people in general, but especially fellow Christians), treat it like the sins you struggle with and give into the most often, not the ones that repulse you. For anyone already doing this, that's awesome.\n\nAgain, my Church does.\n\n > I have to remind myself about all the video games I buy\n\nBuying video games occasionally for oneself isn't a sin if one is donating alms and/or money and/or time. Moderation is key to all things like this.", "589" ], [ "> Accordingly, as reformation celebrations are happening throughout the Western world to commemorate the 500th anniversary of <PERSON>’s 95 theses,\n\nI found that day to be a mournful one, not one of celebration.\n\n > seeing the current state of Protestantism and faithfully guiding us into its future is no less urgent.\n\nI'm scared to see its future with all the destruction that it's caused, sadly.\n\n > end (cessation, limit, or purpose) of Protestantism.\n\nThe end of Protestantism should be joining with the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church as Protestantism's intended purpose is long over.", "703" ], [ "> Like buy this whatever and you'll go to heaven.\n\nThat's never been doctrine or practice of the Church.\n\n > If they actually believed the Bible condolences would have never been sold.\n\nEvil men sold INDULGENCES, not condolences, that were not endorsed or okayed by the Church. It wasn't doctrine or dogma or anything else.\n\n > But there's a very ling history of them going against the Bible.\n\nYour forefathers of the Protestant Reformation did just that.\n\nYou never answered me about the Deuterocanon. Did you read it?", "960" ], [ "> It kinda was for many years, it was indulgences.\n\nWe are talking about the SALE of indulgences, pay attention, please. Selling was never doctrine or dogma.\n\n > <PERSON> was very against them.\n\nHe was against the non-doctrinal sale of fake indulgences.\n\n > The pope at the time was pushing then heavily on the people.\n\nThat does not make the sale doctrinal or dogmatic.\n\n > And when he found out about then he saw no biblical bases for them, which lead to him seeing there was no biblical bases\n\nHe gave into the heresy of *sola scriptura* but then again he had a lot of crazy heretical ideas.\n\n > Roman Catholic church had, and still has.\n\nIt's called the Catholic Church. The Roman Catholic church is one of 24 churches in the Catholic Church. Again, we're not modernist so we have Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition, therefore your point is rendered moot.\n\n > The history we are concerned about is the history at the exact time these letters where wrote.\n\nAnd yet you still use modernist ideas when attempting to interpret....\n\nAnyways, have a nice day, you go your way, I'll go mine. Peace.", "320" ], [ "It depends on things such as was the person mentally ill, what was their motivation, did they cooperate with God's grace in life, etc.\n\nPurgatory isn't a place, it's a state of purification.\n\nIf you're considering suicide, please contact someone pronto who can ease your mind and comfort you! Don't take chances that you may or may not end up with God. God and us all want you to live. You are important.", "168" ], [ "> No need of purgatory. The final purification is done on Earth when a man believes him. \n\nI didn't say purgatory in the beginning of my comment. I merely corrected you on your usage of it in the parenthesis.\n\nPurification starts on Earth cooperating with His grace but it ends in His Presence, as God is an all consuming fire. If you think just belief is enough for theosis..you might want to rethink that. <PERSON>'s blood covers all sins for those who repent and cooperate with His grace. Everyone is free to cooperate.", "649" ], [ "> But you are not on earth, in heaven, or in hell while in the \"state\" of purgatory so\n\nI'll be more specific for you. I believe in the Eastern Christian belief of the final purification which does indeed happen in the Presence of God.\n\nI was just correcting the user above that purgatory is thought to be more of a state in Western theology. I prefer the Eastern theology, however.\n\nPurgatory doesn't have to be a place as God isn't limited by any laws.", "951" ], [ "> Common sense is not a good source for theology and doctrine only God's word.\n\nActually it helped the Church Fathers quite a lot.\n\n > I believe the current heaven has been tainted by sin.\n\nYou can believe that but it's completely not true.\n\n > <PERSON> fell from there and has visited-he is still a member of God's court.\n\nUh. What. Verses.\n\n > Can you be specific about a reference that says nothing imperfect can enter?\n\n**Revelation 21:27 (RSVCE):**\n\n27 *But nothing unclean shall enter it, nor any one who practices abomination or falsehood, but only those who are written in the <PERSON>’s book of life.*", "649" ], [ "I just want to welcome you home with Christ! My husband left the LDS church in 2015 (he has yet to officially resign) after finding <PERSON>. He never looked back.\n\nDoes it not feel like a weight has been lifted off of you? Also, how did your family take it when you left their church? My husband's family and friends basically shunned him after all he'd done for his ward with two callings and all he'd done for his parents.\n\nMay God Bless you!", "529" ], [ "> To add to what others have said, there are numerous stories within the church of how the magic underwear protects you from not just spiritual, but even physical harm.\n\nOh yeah! My husband's ex-best friend liked to tell the story about how when he was in a minor motorcycle accident that his garments protected him from injury wherever they covered his body. I'm thinking that it could be the extra layering of clothing and the type of fabric of all the clothing together that helped to prevent injury.", "459" ], [ "> Mormons do lead very clean lives - in my experience.\n\nIn my experience, many times it's superficial, keeping up appearances. They are encouraged to rat on one another to their Bishop so it's essential to keep your dirty laundry buried deep in your closet. For instance, my husband's ex-best friend was Endowed (wearing the under garments), was a returned Missionary, had a temple recommend, fancy house and car, the quintessential perfect Mormon on the outside who served his ward and went to the 3 hour block on Sundays, and abstained from coffee, tea, and alcohol. He wasn't even filed for divorce or had a consultation before sleeping around with another woman, also looked at porn, and whacked it. If that got out he'd have lost everything so he kept it hidden except to his <PERSON> Mormon friend.", "193" ], [ "There's 24 now, actually, with 7 Rites. :)\n\nLatin, Coptic, Ethiopian, Etritean, Maronite, Syriac, Syro-Malankara, Armenian, Chaldean, Syro-Malabar, Albanian, Berusian, Bulgarian, Greek Church of Serbia and Croatia, Greek Byzantine, Hungarian Greek, Italo-Albanian, Macedonian Greek, Melkite Greek, Romanian Greek, Ruthenian Greek, Slovak Greek, Russian Greek, Ukrainian Greek.\n\nLatin, Byzantine, Maronite, Syriac, Armenian, Chaldean, Alexandrian.\n\nEDIT: Adding stuff.", "703" ], [ "> It's an odd sad thing I don't take lightly, which why I was shocked to run into the Eastern Rite in r/Christianity They may not be on this sub as I guess it is tacitly understood to be the Latin Rite but they have all the same problems of new members in which their ways are the true ways and all the rest of us, even with lineage going back to medieval times, are never treated with courtesy.\n\nThe Catholic Church has always had Eastern churches and Rites or churches coming from the Orthodox (after 1054 A.D.) who were Catholic before being Orthodox and coming back into communion. The Eastern Catholic church that I'm joining HAS ALWAYS been in communion with the Pope and has always been Catholic.\n\nLike I told you over there at r/Christianity, my family has been Catholic since before Medieval times and you didn't treat me with any courtesy yet you ask others for courtesy. Why should you get any awe for your supposed lineage?\n\nAll because my Catholic father didn't get me baptized as a baby you treat me badly even though I've been studying Catholicism for a long time, have assented and live as a devout Catholic, and been going to Mass on and off for 18 years (illness now prevents me a lot). I'm more knowledgeable than a lot of cradle Catholics.\n\nYou treat converts like second class citizens when they're just as Catholic as you are. You're not being very charitable and act like some great respect is owed to you because you are baptized as an infant, and you don't give respect in return. You put yourself above others, not very Christian.\n\nI'm sorry that my father dropped the ball! There you happy? Why should anyone even convert to Catholicism if everyone had an attitude like yours? You treat Catholicism like an exclusive club that only those baptized into her as infants are worthy to be joined. You need to check yourself.", "703" ], [ "> You have stated repeatedly in a previous thread that Purgatory is a third option to death (contextually, it was a third option if the person committed suicide, but the sentiment remains). Which is it, friend?\n\nI never stated it as a third option. You have misconstrued. The final purification takes place in God's Presence, *friend*. For the record, again, as I have stated, I believe in the Eastern Christian belief that differs from the Western thought of Purgatory..if you actually read what I wrote.", "951" ], [ "> You have me intrigued, where is it in scripture?\n\nThere's a lot of metaphor, of course. The Great Communion, the start of Theosis with the foundation of <PERSON>, works, purification, the whole thing.\n\n**1 Corinthians 3:10-15 (RSVCE):**\n\n* 10 *According to the commission of God given to me, like a skilled master builder I laid a foundation, and another man is building upon it. Let each man take care how he builds upon it.*\n* 11 *For no other foundation can any one lay than that which is laid, which is <PERSON>.*\n* 12 *Now if any one builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble—*\n* 13 *each man’s work will become manifest; for the Daywill disclose it, because it will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done.*\n* 14 *If the work which any man has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward.*\n* 15 *If any man’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire.*", "649" ], [ "> Third option as in, it's another path.\n\nNo..it's not.. You just don't understand. I could elaborate but you may further misunderstand.\n\n > I disagree with your stance on this,\n\nYou don't understand my stance.\n\n > but that doesn't mean you're less of a person.\n\nI don't know that that was necessary to include. It seems rather condescending and borderline passive aggressive.\n\n > All I ask is that you don't resort to such measures;\n\nUh, what measures?\n\nAlso, what's with the \"friend\" stuff?", "809" ], [ "> Eucharist is a big deal in Protestantism too. It's one of our two sacraments (baptism and Eucharist). We regard the other Catholic sacraments as rites (such as confirmation).\n\nThat's not all of Protestantism. Some of Protestantism eschews Sacraments altogether or sees them as ordinances that don't confer grace, the Eucharist (meaning the Real Presence) is denied as the Real Presence in some Protestant circles and what they call communion isn't practiced often. Protestantism is all over the map with different beliefs to the many ecclesial communities.", "703" ], [ "> okay girl, if you have trouble believing the lord died for your sins you are hellbound.\n\n > If you think there is some deep process to Believe that, you are not saved. \n\nGirl? Don't be rude. I'm way older than a mere girl. You are not acting Christian.\n\nI said I believed, however you cannot say who will be saved or who will not be. You are not God, thankfully. There is a deeper conversion process for Apostolic Christians, the original Christians.\n\nI'm beginning to think you're trolling.", "951" ], [ "> Second, much of what <PERSON> & His apostles taught was not clearly spelled-out in the Old Testament (or found in it at all). Did that then justify the Jews & Gentiles of their day in rejecting their message & ministry?\n\nThey carried on certain Jewish traditions such as liturgy for worship, for example.\n\n > No, because it was a new revelation/dispensation; hence, additional things pertaining to the salvation of mankind were being revealed.\n\nYes, by the Word of God made Flesh. After He ascended back to be with the Father there was no more need for prophets as He is the final word, the final revelation.\n\n > And as is always the case, it took a great deal of faith to accept & live the new doctrine.\n\nAnd that is why we call it the NEW and ETERNAL Covenant. No more public prophecy or covenants are needed. There have been none since <PERSON>.", "649" ], [ "> I believe it because God has confirmed its truthfulness to me many times by the power of the Holy Ghost.\n\nThe same happened to me with Byzantine Rite Catholicism.\n\n > And I invite you to repent by ceasing to rebel against the God of The Restoration lest you bring upon yourself the fullness of His wrath.\n\nI'm happy with the triune God, the only God in existence, thanks though.\n\n<PERSON> isn't Christian Scripture.", "951" ], [ "> Christians disagree on when the Rapture will happen.\n\nMost Christians also disagree that it is Biblical and disagree that it will even occur since Rapture ideology has only been around for two centuries.\n\n > It is important for our comfort to include the Rapture in our doctrine because it gives us hope that we and our deceased loved ones in Christ have a final destiny with our Savior the Lord Jesus Christ forever!\n\nTruth is more important than comfort, though.", "960" ], [ "> From what I can tell, Eastern Catholics can be a little softer on this approach than Roman Catholics.\n\nI dunno, it seems to be the opposite. Roman Catholics say it is possible that some Protestants may be saved and it's backed up by their theology and the Catechism, however Eastern Catholics take more of an Eastern Orthodox stance and just say we don't know.", "320" ], [ "< It is also the Catholic position that you can earn your way into heaven from purgatory,\n\nHaha, no it's not.\n\n > must confess your sins to an earthly priest,\n\n<PERSON> did give the Apostles the ability to forgive or retain sins. They passed it on and so on.\n\n > it was a position that you could get your sins absolved for the right price...\n\nSource?\n\n > but I do think that if the Catholic Church doesn’t reform itself it’ll be in the same vain as the LDS Church and The Watchtower Organization.\n\nConsidering none of what you said was either truth or you don't understand a teaching, I guess no reform necessary. To lump the Catholic Church in with the LDS and JWs is silly because Catholicism teaches the Trinity and professes the Creeds. If we are throwing Trinitarians into the LDS/JW grouping there are a few Protestant groups that have odd views like them..", "320" ], [ "You sound rather shallow, no offense meant. You might want to find out why you feel uncomfortable around biracial or multiracial couples and get that resolved. Also, we shouldn't call a group of any kind ugly either, that's wrong. It's okay to not be attracted to every opposite sex individual you come across and to have preferences but at the same time you shouldn't rule women out based solely on genetics. What about her devotion and faithfulness to God and practicing of Eastern Orthodoxy? What about her personality? Things like that.\n\nI remind myself that if it weren't for biracial couples, my husband nor I would be here today. I have Chinese ancestors from long ago, Turkish ancestors, and a Native American great great grandmother. My husband has a Native American great great grandparent and I am unsure what else.\n\nEdit to add the best advice: Talk to your Priest about this.", "255" ], [ "When we went to the Tridentine Mass, the chant was always a capella and beautiful. The sad part was that we couldn't hear the schola very well because the Tridentine Mass doesn't allow microphones and so the Priest and schola were hard to hear as the church's architecture wasn't built to amplify sound.\n\nAt least in our Parish the Byzantine chant seems to go well with soft organ playing.", "703" ], [ "> and the church is not a building or an organization its the true followers of <PERSON>.\n\nLikewise the Orthodox Church isn't a building or organization but is made up of followers of <PERSON>.\n\n > the catholic church does not teach that , they teach that people are supposed to \" meet god half way in Holiness\" \n\nNo, it teaches that cooperation is possible only with God's grace.\n\n > Catholicism is works based and not the true gospel.\n\nNo, it teaches that true faith has the natural fruit of good works. Even Protestantism teaches that.\n\n > leading to you have to work and get credit for some of the sanctification that you go through.\n\nOnly God's grace makes Sanctification possible. Therefore no credit goes to anyone but God.\n\n > the sacrifice of <PERSON> accredited that righteousness to us in the eyes of God. that is why we still have sin in our lives and it takes a whole lifetime to become sanctified( that happens when you die). \n\nCorrect.\n\n > but these works are meant to be done joyfully not with the expectation of being paid back by admission to heaven.\n\nCorrect. It is to be done by God's grace with love of God.\n\n > in conclusion salvation is through faith alone. there is nothing we can do to win a spot in heaven. and <PERSON> did it all by giving his life for us.\n\nCorrect. Also, when we have faith any good work we do is because of God's grace and therefore are His works, not ours so we cannot boast in them. Any works done without God's grace are as filthy rags which is why unbelievers cannot buy their way into heaven (none of us can).", "320" ], [ "> I'm sorry that these people look the way they do.\n\nThat's rather arrogant.\n\n > Perhaps if they were beautiful, it would've gone to their head and they would've fallen into great sin?\n\nTo others they very well are beautiful, therefore your point is moot. You are more than likely not attractive to everyone; should you be sorry for how you look because some people don't find you attractive? Of course not.\n\n > Perhaps God wants to contrast them with us as a warning of what can happen if we don't repent?\n\nWho is \"us\"?\n\nSo you're saying that people who aren't white are so because they haven't repented? That sounds like a teaching from LDS Mormonism.", "378" ], [ "> If your biggest fault is the way you look, then that's nothing.\n\nMy looks aren't a fault at all. I'm happy with them and so is my husband. He says I'm the most attractive woman he's ever seen.\n\n > I just don't want to be in a relationship with them and I'd prefer for other attractive people to do the same.\n\nWhat you think is attractive might not be for others and what you don't think is attractive is to others, therefore you're mad over nothing but your subjective opinion which you have to admit is a bit immature.\n\n > It'd be nicer if society got more attractive, that's all.\n\nSince that's subjective your idea is nonsensical.\n\n > The only way that can happen is for attractive people to stick together and outbreed the ugly people. But it's not an enormous deal. \n\nThat's gross.", "378" ], [ "> Well if the Catholic Church didn't add books that wasn't part of the Jewish Canon and are contradicting..\n\nThey didn't have a solidified Canon until the middle ages. All these books we have are in the Septuagint that was widely in use at the time of <PERSON> and the early Church. They're also not contradicting.\n\n > and I'm sure you do hate that guy who translated the Bible into common language, because people were able to see through the false teachings.\n\nThe Bible was started to be translated into English (a dialect no longer in use but was used then) in the 8th century by St. <PERSON>. Most laity could not read for the longest time and the printing press was not invented until the middle ages so bibles were expensive and hand copied. Literate laity could go to their Parish and copy what they wanted from the Parish Bible. When the printing press was invented and thus literacy was more widespread the Catholic Church started printing the Douay-Rheims Bible in 1610 (NT 1582).", "487" ], [ "> cooperation would mean that we become 100% sinless while on this earth. and that's just not possible for humanity ( its possible for God but only does that when we come home thats the end of sanctification that you said correct to)\n\nHence why I said that only with God's grace is it possible.\n\n > so if im understanding what you are saying ' do good works and that will instill ( infuse ) true faith in you' its the opposite direction of that its that faith produces good works.\n\nI said faith produces good works. Why twist what I said?", "951" ], [ "The Christian way is in marriage and only between the spouses. After that if you're a Roman Catholic Christian you can only have PiV sex to finish with no artificial birth control or barrier methods (other sexual things for foreplay are fine). Otherwise the non-RC Church or ecclesial community doesn't get involved in the bedroom as long as the sexual stuff stays between the spouses only. Birth control can be hit or miss depending on sect or denomination and/or intent to use it (in Orthodoxy it's not the ideal and should be avoided (NFP being the preferred way to space births and in dire situations) and one should talk to one's Priest before using it but there's never been a prohibition on it except since 1937 in the Church of Greece.) The sex also has to be consensual, of course.", "589" ], [ "I've never really thought of <PERSON> as blonde haired, blue eyed and fair skinned. Maybe because I'm none of those things. I'm also unfamiliar with a lot of Protestant paintings too. I have rarely seen LDS paintings but the ones I have seen He has fair skin, light brown hair, and blue eyes. I prefer Eastern Christian icons for a reason.", "887" ], [ "I started in 2015 but back to back illnesses have prevented me from being able to make the meetings (which my Catechist says you must be there or else another year) and monetary issues and not being able to get out of the house a lot have prevented getting the annulment that I need. It costs like $150 just to file the paperwork. I made a resolution during the Vigil Mass last night that these things were no longer going to hold me back. If I have to drag myself to RCIA wheezing and in pain, I'll do it.\n\nThank you for your sweetness. Happy Pascha to you and yours!", "42" ], [ "He might have and the paperwork was just the old costs. I'm going to talk with my Priest about that. Yeah, my husband has been in talks with the Catechist but she seemingly won't budge. He's being baptized next year. I'm just a very shy lady and don't want to make a scene but things can't remain this way. We will talk with the Deacon again. He seems very nice and helpful always. I guess I'm a bit afraid of the Catechist..that sounds dumb.", "529" ], [ "> Is getting tubes tied really that black and white to people?\n\nIt's grave matter whether it's life threatening or not. I didn't miss that part of your post. I have my own concerns if I got pregnant, having a uterine fibroid tumor 2/3 size of my uterus that's very painful. I use NFP because of grave reason. NFP utilizes a woman's natural cycle, not disrupting it like with HBC or stopping it like with HBC implants, or being a foreign object in the uterus like an IUD, or being a barrier to unity like with condoms, or mutilating the body like with sterilization. NFP leaves fertility in God's hands.", "343" ], [ "> Does the Roman Catholic church not disfellowship (excommunicate) heretics and the unrepentant? Might need another peek inside that catechism.\n\nIt's the Catholic Church as the Roman Catholic church is one of 24 churches within. A person can be excommunicated *latae sententiae*, however that is not a formal action like disfellowshipping. Sometimes only the person knows if the Priest doesn't. I know my Catechism, thanks. Even a formally excommunicated person must go to Mass without partaking of the Eucharist.\n\n > When I mentioned the church I was referrring to the catholic church (not Roman Catholic), of the west.\n\nNot all Catholics in the Catholic Church are Latin/Roman Catholic. Also, we're not the same church. Though you guys are in an imperfect communion with the Catholic Church by virtue of baptism, that would be the only way we'd be connected church wise.\n\n > My second paragraph was addressing the OP as any response should/could continue to address.\n\nThen perhaps make a second comment, explain that? I don't usually come across people doing that often.", "320" ], [ "> The RCC uses a translation called the American Standard Version.\n\nI'm just trying to help you refer correctly to the Church in which you are addressing. The Latin/Roman Catholic church uses the New American Bible Revised Edition (NABRE) in the U.S. and Philippines. I have never heard of the American Standard Version, it probably is a Protestant version. Canada uses the NRSVCE or close to that. In Europe a lot use the Jerusalem Bible.", "703" ], [ "> you can't come 2000 years later and claim you, and only you, have some Oral Tradition of the Apostles none ever heard of just because you wear a mitre in Rome.\n\nThe Catholic Church has been around nearly 2k years..we didn't just crop up last week.. The Catholic Church has been practicing Apostolic Tradition since the beginning..as have the Orthodox....\n\nMost Protestants DON'T accept anything but the Bible....", "320" ], [ "> I forget exactly where I heard they were using the ASV, isn't the NABRE only for private study and not the liturgy? If I'm not mistaken the liturgy is some version of the RSV, Ignatius Bible, though I could be wrong. (The ASV also comes from the RSV so I guess I got mixed up)\n\nA modified version of the NABRE is used for liturgy in the U.S. and Philippines.\n\n > If I'm not mistaken the liturgy is some version of the RSV, Ignatius Bible, though I could be wrong.\n\nThat would be the RSV2CE and it may be used outside of the U.S. and Philippines. It's different than the RSV. We don't use Protestant Bibles.", "703" ], [ "> Remember there is a difference between the legal agreement of marriage and the religious ceremony.\n\nMy Church accepts non-Catholic marriages that are done between the unbaptized as they are called natural marriage which can only be between a man and woman. Therefore in light of that, any union that calls itself marriage that is not man and woman is a simulation of a Sacrament or natural marriage and we should not accept them as equal to that of a Sacramental or natural marriage, and thus must take exception to those being called marriage. I do feel the same about divorce and remarriage as well.", "83" ], [ "> We are both protestant and catholic. We believe that the Eucharist is the real presence of Christ, the Communion of Saints interceding on our behalf, and the succession of Bishops from the Apostles.\n\nYou're not Catholic despite having a Catholic aesthetic. The Apostolic Churches see your ecclesial community's succession as only male Bishops who have been ordained outside of the Anglican Communion as Succession was broken. Having Succession does not make one Catholic. The Anglicans have always been called Protestant, especially the CoE and the Episcopal church.", "320" ], [ "> They can try to keep the wine from the ordinary people, but they cannot stop anyone from benefiting from the saving blood of <PERSON>.\n\nWe believe the Blood is present in the Body, also a lot of Parishes offer both species. Eastern Catholic churches always have both.\n\nAs a non-liturgical Protestant, this doesn't mean anything to you anyway as it's just a symbol you don't do all that often. It's just crackers and juice. You're concern trolling.\n\n > it's not in the scriptures,\n\nNot everything is in Scripture.\n\n > they are all the traditions of men,\n\nLike *Sola Scriptura*.", "703" ], [ "> The Orthodox Church is still the Catholic Church \n\nMore like the Eastern Orthodox Catholic Church.\n\nThe Catholic Church has the Roman Catholic church and 23 other sui iuris churches within including those of the Byzantine Rite, for example.\n\n > It is the Church of Christ because it was founded by <PERSON> and is His body.\n\nSo is the Catholic Church. The Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, and Catholic Church were one Church once.\n\n > But to avoid confusion with the Roman Catholics, or the Church of Christ denomination, or the Baptists, the name \"Orthodox\" was chosen because it is our straight teachings, straight down from the Apostles, that separate us from them.\n\nThe Baptist church and Church of Christ weren't even around when the name Orthodox began being used. Not to mention, Baptists and Church of Christ are Protestant and Catholics are definitely not.", "320" ], [ "> I don’t debate with people who don’t understand basic science.\n\nThen in this instance you should refrain from debating, yourself.\n\n > but at least the wall doesn’t hate and try to control people and things that are different to them.\n\nLike a certain Left ideology who police people's language, their values or else they'll be publicly shunned, etc.?", "965" ], [ "> You do not have to try to put words into my mouth, I already know the typical \"license to sin\" replies that the free grace message receives. It's too good to be true, that's why it's a gift of God.\n\nYeah that's all good and all but you keep dodging. What about each sin committed, do you EVER ask forgiveness or are you presumptuous that no matter what you you'll be forgiven anyway? All the sins you'll ever commit are covered and thus you don't need to curb the sinning? That's not orthodox.\n\n > That is actually what you wrote.\n\nI summed the position you're implying up nicely for you.", "951" ], [ "> Younger people want the opposite,\n\nWhen I was a teen I always loved my Protestant chapel because it was structured and reverent, more traditional. The order of the service was in the bulletin, much like Catholics have Missals. As soon as I attended Mass as a teen, I was sold because of the tradition and reverence. I've noticed a lot of young people are becoming more and more traditional even now like you said.", "703" ], [ "> I believe that I was forgiven when I was saved, and if I am not forgiven, then I am not saved.\n\nSo you can essentially just do whatever you want then? Yay or nay? Stop beating around the bush.\n\n > I have lots of unorthodox beliefs,\n\nThat's unfortunate.\n\n > I believe <PERSON> was an unorthodox preacher.\n\n<PERSON> is God so He can do as He pleases and can never be unorthodox.\n\nGuess there will be no straight answer.", "951" ], [ "> First, the law is the entire law.\n\nThe Ceremonial and Civil Laws were fulfilled by Christ, the Mosaic Law. We still have the Moral Law as reiterated in the NT which the Church has believed for 2,000 years almost.\n\n > Second, no one is justified by the law.\n\nIf one has true Faith they will bear good fruit. That means avoiding sin.", "649" ], [ "> I know but that doesn't mean you have to have sex with your partner, you can still live in a loving marriage just without this. That confused me for a long time where I thought we were under some obligation to reproduce which we are not. \n\nEh, maybe you should speak to a Priest.\n\nI'll add..\n\n > I know but that doesn't mean you have to have sex with your partner, you can still live in a loving marriage just without this.\n\nMaybe that might work for you but not for all. A lot of us must because we love our spouse and need to be one with them.", "993" ], [ "> The idea goes back to the Gospel: In Mark 9:38-41, <PERSON> tells his disciples not to interfere with a group that could reasonably be descibed as non-Apostolic Christians...\n\nThe idea of an invisible church by way of Protestants is a relatively new thing. We recognize that those outside of our Church are Christian by virtue of baptism and are in an imperfect communion much like those others in the verse were in an imperfect communion.", "320" ], [ "> Even the Vatican doesn't deny it outright,\n\nPope Francis has talked about Hell a lot, therefore some 93 year old guy who is known to twist words because he never keeps record of what was said..it wouldn't be a farfetched thing to believe the opposite of what he said given that as I said Pope <PERSON> talks about Hell.\n\n > Opening the church to same-sex civil unions,\n\nThat can't happen since the matter is settled.\n\n > allowing priests to forgive the \"sin of abortion.\"\n\nWhat's wrong with the repentant being allowed to have absolution..and so you know Priests have been forgiving abortion in the U.S. before Pope Francis.\n\n > Gatekeeping, saying that those who produce firearms can't be called Christians,\n\nWow, he has an opinion.\n\n > saying he wont judge gays.\n\nHe said he won't judge celibate homosexuals.\n\n > Then there's the time he said anyone could go to heaven, including atheists.\n\nHe never said that. Then again you're so virulently anti-Catholic that you'll believe anything the media reports.\n\n > All of these point to <PERSON> being the end to the Catholic church, the black pope seen in St. Malachy's vision.\n\nI don't believe in it, so.", "320" ], [ "> NFP is just a loophole and is a sin.\n\nThe Church says otherwise when used for grave reason. Contraceptives mess with the body, NFP uses the body's natural functions. There can be contraceptive intent, though for grave reason it is moral and licit to use. Contraceptives distort the being open to life end of sex and say no definitively, some methods are not unitive either. NFP when used for grave reason realizes that conception can occur and does nothing to stop it from happening. A couple does not always want to have sex or have to have sex. When there is grave reason to use NFP, the mood for intercourse is kind of gone anyway IME. With contraceptives, one can have sex all month long, getting your cake and eating it too..with NFP there is sacrifice and no eating that cake.", "992" ], [ "> > Obviously you and the catholic church disagrees,\n\nNope, we don't.\n\n > I did a bit more research and saw that sterilization is okay under the church when it is not a direct result of health care:\n\nWe were talking about contraception and you know that, not medical issues which is not contraception. It wouldn't be mutilation if it's for a medical reason, obviously. That is part of the reason why I used the word mutilation.\n\n > Anyways what I mean by out of touch I just don't think the Church sees that all situations arent equal, but in an effort for uniformity condemns it as a whole.\n\nSometimes our feelings can get in the way of objective and rational thinking and I believe that is happening in your case. It's a human thing.\n\n > I'll do my best to follow it I just don't think its understanding of situations where pregnancies might want to be avoided. For example my friend's wife almost died last time she gave birth, she had sepsis and it was a miracle she survived. So is now the only acceptable way for her to avoid another pregnancy and going through that way is basically abstinence and NFP? It just doesn't seem sympathetic or reasonable\n\nTruth isn't always sympathetic, but it is reasonable.", "529" ], [ "> It’s OK I come third in a line of people trained like that but I quit the paid ministry when I read what <PERSON> said about it - I can understand financial needs makes obeying scripture hard for some so they carry on being paid for serving God - but hired hands never care enough do they.\n\nYou seriously don't know anything about Catholic Priests, Bishops, and Deacons? They go through seminary and years of training, they're ordained, they serve the people all day everyday, their whole day is devoted to the Lord. For Priests and Bishops they get paid enough to live, room and board, and then they donate most of what they have.", "703" ], [ "> I think he was the Elohim of the Old Covenant before he was born as a man, now he is the first born of something new. If we want to continue believing that <PERSON> is still God now in his new spiritual body, then I think this is the same thing as saying that we will also become like God when we receive the same new bodies.\n\nAre you a Mormon?\n\n > I think the Son left behind his god-powers when he became a human like us, so if he somehow picked them back up again,\n\nThat's the ancient heresy of Nestorianism.", "649" ], [ "We gift rather than tithe. My Parish shares a financial statement annually that tells where each penny has gone. Our gift envelopes tell us where the money will be going before we donate. A lot goes to keep the Parish and church going (it's also a school) and to pay employees (people need work, not just charity), the rest goes to help those in need via food pantry and such. There's many ministries too.\n\nWe give about 2.5% as that's all we have.", "974" ], [ "> In what way? She gave birth to <PERSON>' physical body, but nowhere does he say we should pray to her.\n\nMother <PERSON> is the Mother of God. <PERSON> is fully God and man in which these two natures are inseparable. To separate <PERSON>'s two natures of true God and true man is the ancient heresy of Nestorianism.\n\nMother <PERSON> is not believed to be a Mediator as that is solely <PERSON> (because of being true God and true man..the perfect Mediator for us). She is able to intercede, though, to ask her Son, God the Son, favors as she has His ear so to speak, being His Mom and all. Praying doesn't always mean to worship.", "649" ], [ "> Why do you use the word sect for Catholicism? Catholics are united under one Church which is made up of churches in communion with each other just like the Orthodox.\n\nFor me, I believe that the Orthodox Church is THE Church, therefore other Christian sects aren't the Church, though there are other churches (lower case 'c'). Sect is more apt than denomination as above was discussed that Orthodoxy and Catholicism aren't denominations. Orthodoxy too is a sect.\n\nMy app apparently didn't update the edit where I was more specific.", "320" ], [ "They don't have lineage from the Apostles whatsoever as Mormonism nor the Book of Mormon (as <PERSON> was its author) wasn't around in any form until the 1800s. Apostolic Succession means that the laying on of hands and specific ceremony has been carried on from Apostle to Bishop and that Bishop to another, and so on. Mormonism *claims* that Priesthood authority was given by St. Peter in the 1800s to <PERSON> but it's only a claim used to usurp the ministerial Priesthood from Eastern Orthodoxy, Oriental Orthodoxy, and Catholicism, and isn't what is understood by ancient Christianity to be Apostolic Succession, and definitely not what is understood by Orthodoxy. Mormonism doesn't have a valid Priesthood.", "320" ], [ "> People are unhappy because they have no direction in their life.\n\nIn my case it's a chemical imbalance.\n\n > Those lacking in your life is because you don't believe in God.\n\nI believe in God but I still have depression and OCD. I believe it's a cross that I have to bear in this life. When I bear it and try I am following God's will. Also, my meds help correct the chemical imbalance so I can function.", "739" ], [ "The Priest at my former RC Parish started ignoring me after an issue with the Catechist, even after we told him that I had been in the hospital with an upper GI bleed, he just walked away saying nothing, and refused to talk to me for awhile before and after. I kinda felt shunned. It wasn't that that caused me to drop Catholicism, I would have just moved Parishes if I still believed, or ignored the Priest's ignoring me.", "529" ], [ "That happened to my husband at his former LDS ward. He was accused of something in his youth and it was dismissed in court as the plaintiff having lied and falsely accused him, which the plaintiff did lie and it was very easy to prove. Still, his ward members refused to accept this ruling and told him to repent and shunned him, he was even denied to serve a mission though he was innocent. That resulted in him not being able to find a girlfriend in the YSA ward (he and I had dated but he wasn't allowed to date non-LDS so they broke us up) or going to the temple for Endowment.\n\nHe screwed up with the law in his early twenties after having had a bad heat stroke that wasn't treated due to his devout LDS mother saying that he didn't need treatment and diagnosed him with something else (strokes can mess your mind up), and even after he served his time, the ward still had their backs turned to him. They acted like he wasn't there even after his repentance time. Women refused still to date him despite him being a nice guy and easy on the eyes. He still couldn't serve a mission or be Endowed in the temple which meant no temple sealing and no devout Mormon woman would date a man who couldn't be sealed to her and thus both getting to go to the Celestial Kingdom. His own family was cold to him too.", "193" ], [ "> And seeing as I specified Russian, you're grasping for straws on this.\n\nI'm not grasping any straws. If you had done the slightest research you'd be saying Byzantine Rite instead of Eastern Rite which there are 6, therefore meaning they are not one Rite but many. The Rites shouldn't be lumped together. As I said as an example, the Maronite Rite is different from the Byzantine Rite. It's about respect for differences.", "703" ], [ "> Let me repeat yet again. The term \"Orthodox Church\" is redundant, since the church is orthodox.\n\nIt is not redundant. That is the name of the ancient Church, well, Orthodox Catholic Church to be more precise, but also called the Orthodox Christian Church. It's of the East, not the West. This notion of an invisible church of all believers was a foreign concept before a few centuries ago.", "320" ], [ "> He has a physical body (Genesis 9:6) and formed man in His likeness and image. In order for God to have done this it would require Him to have a body if not then we would not have a body\n\nNo, it means that we are in the image of what He wanted to create, in His imagining. Neither Jews nor Christians believe that He has a body or ever did. After all it wouldn't make sense given that <PERSON> is the Word made flesh as the visible icon of the Father who is invisible and no man has seen. If the Father had a body then God becoming flesh in the incarnation (<PERSON>) would have been not needed.\n\n > These demonstrate this truth so either <PERSON> was praying to Himself or to His Father. \n\nThis shows ignorance of the Holy Trinity. The Holy Trinity are three Divine Persons of one Godly Essence (not mere purpose which would mean three gods). <PERSON> prayed to His Father. You're confusing Trinitarianism with Modalism.", "649" ], [ "> tithes and fast offerings are used to forward the work of God and to help the poor so I think that the word pretentious is out of place \n\nThey go to the various temples being built and other things than the poor. Very little goes to the poor. Also the lack of transparency is troubling.\n\nTithes are required to go to the temple and do endowments and marriage sealings. That's basically purchasing Salvation which in Christianity is called Simony and is not allowed.", "703" ], [ "> So it is wrong to build a church building and to ask for willful donations to that cause?\n\nThey're not really wilful if they're required to get to your highest house of worship. I go to my Church's temple every week and we don't require recommends or tithing to enter. Everyone is welcome to worship with us in Divine Liturgy. My LDS in-laws even worshiped with us on Christmas Eve.", "529" ], [ "> The primary reason for the schism, beside the papacy, was that the West was not using the creed anymore, but a modified version that speaks wrongly about the Holy Spirit...\n\nI'm quite aware of the whole *Filioque* debacle, however it's still the Creed even if it has an illegitimate addition that should not be there. The liturgical Protestant ecclesial communities use it sans some traditional Anglicans. It's used all over the West. Therefore you're saying ALL of them aren't Christian by extension and that's utterly ridiculous.", "320" ], [ "> There is no male or female accoeding to scrioture are you sure you want to be called a 🚺? \n\nYeah, I want to be referred to as I am.\n\n > And you need to get over your prjudice of <PERSON> he is a part of mankind just as you are.\n\nYou're prejudice against the Church Fathers.\n\n > If you dot like <PERSON> just don't get involved in posts referring to him\n\nThen you shouldn't get involved in posts not about <PERSON> to warn people against Christianity.", "181" ], [ "> What I’m talking about it is a personal prayer language that you first have ‘utterance’ of when you receive the Holy Spirit. And it is meant for every* believer who asks. Like what happened to <PERSON> (the first gentile believer to receive the Holy Spirit.\n\nI'm aware of the cherry picked verses to support this modern doctrine of Glossollalia, which I mentioned before, is not Biblical and not seen before a century ago. The personal prayer language is most likely beyond verbal utterings and a groaning of the spirit itself, not verbal. We don't see Glossollalia in the early Church.\n\n\"Glossollalia\" is experienced when the mind has an overload of stimuli. It is not a prayer language but the brain's natural reaction to over emotion.\n\nI have experienced something beyond mere ramblings of random syllables which is what Glossollalia is, rambling.", "703" ], [ "> Doesn't matter his message is for all so it is from God.\n\nSo is the Church Fathers.\n\n > As <PERSON> says it is from God if it is not in the name of self so if his message comes in the spirit of all mankind it is from God.\n\nSo the messages from the Church Fathers are from God. Glad we agree.\n\nEdit to your edit:\n\n > As <PERSON> denies his own self so did <PERSON> the message is always the same and from God if the whole is accointed for\n\nChurch Fathers denied themselves. Therefore, you agree.\n\nAnother edit to your edit of your edit:\n\n > thats why God gave him a gift. It doesnt make him better as a soul. He is still worth just as much as anyone else\n\nThe Church Fathers have a gift. You agree.", "951" ], [ "> I see where you're coming from, but with congregations this large, you need a simple, sanitary way to administer communion.\n\nMy former RC Parish managed. But then again the Apostolic Churches (and traditional liturgical Protestants) believe what <PERSON> said during the Last Supper so it wasn't juice and crackers. I guess it doesn't matter when it's just symbology.\n\nMy current EO Parish does intinction administered by a spoon. It's sanitary.\n\n > The value of communion isn't in the elements themselves, it's in the heart of the consumer who knows they are nourished by the spirit of <PERSON>.\n\nOnly bread and wine can become the Body and Blood of Christ. As is in our pre-communion prayer, it nourishes the body, mind, and soul as it is <PERSON> in Body and Spirit.", "703" ], [ "> just suggest correcting any incorrect statements that can come off as offensive or incorrect.\n\nWell, my comment was not such and I stand by the original but didn't want anymore backlash or petty downvotes.\n\n > Even low church evangelicals have liturgy.\n\nPeople will know what I mean by adding traditional. I'm not doing any further changes to appease anyone.\n\nPlease don't ask me again on this in the future or reply complaining about it. I don't need the stress or to do anything against my beliefs.\n\nEnjoy your day.", "703" ], [ "> While don't necessarily disagree with you, I'm just saying. This language \"God the Son\" is not really biblical.\n\nIt doesn't matter if it's \"Biblical\" or not. Things exist outside of the Bible. You're splitting hairs for no reason.\n\n > I don't think you're gonna call <PERSON> in heaven God, the Son. You're just gonna refer to him as <PERSON>\n\nHere on earth, we need qualifiers to know what we're talking about with one another. So I'll continue to be explanatory so people can understand.", "649" ], [ "> <PERSON> 7:9\n\n<PERSON> was described similarly in Relevation.\n\n**Revelation 1:12-15 Revised Standard Version (RSV):**\n\n12 *Then I turned to see the voice that was speaking to me, and on turning I saw seven golden lampstands,* 13 *and in the midst of the lampstands one like a son of man, clothed with a long robe and with a golden girdle round his breast;* 14 *his head and his hair were white as white wool, white as snow; his eyes were like a flame of fire, 15 his feet were like burnished bronze, refined as in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of many waters;*", "718" ], [ "> 79 million amercans have HPV, each year 3 million new cases are diagnosed.\n\nExactly. And a lot are innocent people. Like a wife/husband who got it from an unfaithful spouse or somehow contracting it through touch after the person has gone to the bathroom and didn't wash..stuff like that. It's not God's punishment at all. It's not detectable in men and there's few strains that affect men. But women have hundreds of strains that can kill them.", "65" ], [ "Glossollalia is few centuries old unBiblical gibberish. End of story.\n\nAnd don't assume things about me. In the last year I've had to reevaluate my beliefs. However, Glossollalia is proven gibberish. The actual personal prayer language goes beyond mere verbal utterings. Repeating the same syllables over and over is babbling as the pagans do.\n\nAgree to disagree. Case closed and good night.", "487" ], [ "> Only those who were born with easy lives say what you just wrote\n\nMy life is anything *but* easy. Living in extreme poverty is hard, being ill all the time is hard and painful, not being able to leave the house hardly because of illness, not being able to stay awake a lot, being just a full time house sitter, having an old car that always breaks down, having no money, scraping food together every night.\n\nYeah that's an easy life. Much easier than just thinking oneself is ugly. /s\n\nWhat I speak is truth. We follow God because of love, not gain.", "142" ], [ "My husband was 29 before we got back together. Women ignored him, wouldn't go out with him, friendzoned him. He wasn't great at socializing. He's overweight but kind and funny. Women didn't want any of that. Although I do even if they did not and ignored him. Their loss. There's one woman out there who is probably socially awkward as well. My husband and I both broke out of our shells together at our Parish after being socially awkward our whole lives (I have mental issues too, PMDD is a suspect of what it is). My husband stopped caring about relationships and moved on with his life and when he did that it just happened that we got together again after a long time. Maybe do that.", "585" ], [ "> I'm not the one with problems from the opposite side, choosing to downvote to disagree.\n\nLooks like multiple people disagree with your insistence on forcing debate.\n\n > My bias isn't keeping me from considering other things, yours is.\n\nYou pestered me first when I had ended the conversation with the other person and you wouldn't let it go. This is on you.\n\n > but I honestly just want people to have the right mentality when it comes to discussing and debating theology.\n\nYou called me a cuss word, that's how you debate. I never did that to you. I get impatient when I'm insulted, called names, and I have tried to end the debate but you keep on. Are all Baptists like this? I hope not.\n\nNow go away please.", "730" ], [ "> The cross is not a symbol of who you are, it’s a Catholic cultural aesthetic.\n\nThe Orthodox would like a word with you as well as traditional Protestants. Also, it's not mere culture.\n\nJust because you've had bad experiences with people who had crosses on doesn't mean all are like that. People can wear whatever they want and act however they want however unfortunate. Christians can still wear their cross and act proper. I see it in my own Parish.", "320" ], [ "> The cross holds no meaning on its own, some people just use it for aesthetic.\n\nIt does even if the wearer denies the true meaning.\n\n > I wouldn’t call everyone bearing a cross a Christian.\n\nNo but the cross is still a Christian symbol.\n\n > But just because a cross is plastered on something doesn’t make it holy.\n\nAlthough the symbol itself is holy by virtue of being what it is even if the subject wearing it or object with it isn't. It isn't worshiped, but it is a sacred symbol even if abused.\n\n > It’s what the creators intention was for putting it there that holds its meaning.\n\nThere's only one meaning for the cross despite any intentions.", "960" ], [ "> There is not a command in the Bible to draw crosses everywhere we go and that this is what God ordained a cross to mean when you see one.\n\nGod and Christianity isn't constrained to a tome of books even if inspired.\n\n > It was something man chose to do and any man can see it and interpret in in their own way because there is no definite truth behind it as God created all truths and man only creates opinions and interpretations.\n\nSounds like *Sola Scriptura*.", "487" ], [ "> Sure but at the time the Catholic Church and the pope held more power than the king.\n\nThat's still not where it originated.\n\n > The Protestant revolution didn’t happen until later and those denominations spread through colonization where there was a separation of church and state. So people could ignore the local churches if they wished as it wasn’t forced upon them.\n\nChurch of England, anyone?", "773" ], [ "> i wouldn’t know about that, most churches are private and independent. At least here in America.\n\nI'm American yet I know history.\n\n > I can only speak of Americans who wear crosses since we live in secular neighborhoods.\n\nPeople wear all sorts of things just because.\n\n > That doesn’t make both of these persons one and the same theologically.\n\nNever said it did.", "960" ], [ "> Oh yes I see, you’re orthodox.\n\nCatechumen for now.\n\n > The Bible contains God’s Word and was hand written by those directly inspired by God.\n\nI did write the word inspired.\n\n > I don’t believe we can come to an agreement based on biblical truths if we cannot agree that the Bible is truth and those that disagree with the Bible are false, so I will leave it here.\n\nIt's part of the Truth.\n\n > Have a nice day, sweety.\n\nDon't be condescending.\n\nPeace.", "320" ], [ "This is asked quite often. Perhaps a search of the subreddit can help.\n\nApostolic Christians (Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Roman/Eastern Catholics, Church of the East) ask intercession from Mother Mary and the Saints just like people ask in this subreddit for prayer requests. That's intercession. They are alive in <PERSON> as He is the God of the living, not the dead. They pass our prayers along to God just as those on earth do for us. It doesn't hurt to have someone intercede for you.", "703" ], [ "You come here too? Hi my friend!! Yes, it is my understanding from my husband who was Mormon for almost 30 years that once the Twelve perished that the church was taken up to heaven since it had gone into the Great Apostasy and the Priesthood was lost along with Apostolic Succession and all that goes with it.\n\nHowever what puzzles me is that it is said in LDS Mormonism that St. John of Patmos/the Evangelist didn't die.\n\nI'll stop there and let an actual Mormon answer.", "703" ], [ "> You called me condescending, that’s an insult.\n\nI said you're being condescending with the \"sweety\" remark.\n\n > Has a grandmother never called you sweety before?\n\nIt has an air of superiority and since we're not friends, acquaintances, or family the connotation is of one talking down to the other. Perhaps you are unaware of cultures.\n\n > I suppose it can mean anything to anyone and no ones really wrong, as God hasn’t given us a definition of sweety Himself giving it no definite truth.\n\nI don't like being called such. I'm a grown woman.\n\n > I’m sorry if our interpretations got mixed up there and caused offense.\n\nAnd downvoting my replies isn't?", "730" ], [ "> Mormons believe that the Pentarchy's Apostolic Sees are just bishops as per LDS Bishops\n\nAlthough that isn't what we see in the early Church of even the second century.\n\n > and that an Apostle organizing a bishopric is not the Apostle designating that bishopric as being a successor to the Apostle\n\nEven though that was the intention.\n\n > but that like the choice of <PERSON> the Apostles needed to meet as a quorum in order to refill the quorum with the death of an Apostle.\n\nAlthough <PERSON> was chosen by lot and then hands laid on him.\n\nWell, they are entitled to those beliefs.", "703" ], [ "> They also point to things like the papal seat being bought, popes resigning, etc. to teach that the true and proper authority to act in <PERSON>’s name and lead His church was removed from the earth, as things were done properly.\n\nThey forget that Christianity wasn't only in the West but that there were and are churches in the East. Rome was but one of several churches in one Church. We don't have a Pope and when we did he was first among equal Bishops.", "320" ], [ "> Is intercession for those who won't pray on their own? Can't exclusively be because <PERSON> asks the churches to pray for him and we know he prays. Is it then to cover the time when we are not praying? Is it because a group of us makes more of a presence before our Lord?\n\nYou bring up brilliant questions. Perhaps it's all of the above? I'll have to think about this.\n\n > At the end of the day i think the point of the corporate prayer actually rests on us being a community of believers. A body. THE body. That our agreement is the important thing. Our standing together.\n\nBingo. Communion of the saints.", "703" ], [ "> I think it would be more appropriate to say that Mormons believe the apostles failed to pass on the necessary authority to continue the church.\n\nIf that is so then <PERSON> chose His Apostles unwisely.\n\n > Like if every Bishop and Cardinal and the Pope (obviously very heavily intersected groups) all were instantly killed, I don't think that there would be enough authority left to re-establish the Catholic Church as Catholic doctrine is currently understood.\n\nAccording to Catholicism, Orthodoxy has valid Apostolic Succession so one could be ordained through the Orthodox Church.", "320" ], [ "> You know that Mormonism rejects Tradition except for the Bible (provisionally), right?\n\nI'm aware but that doesn't change anything. They accept their own 19th century tradition though so lets not pretend they're *Sola Scriptura*. [Edited]\n\n > The text of the Bible says <PERSON> for various people where we don't have the description of it being by lots or other method of choosing them, which is what I meant and not questioning the laying on of hands.\n\nAlthough it says in the Bible that <PERSON> was chosen by lot. Therefore that's one method.", "487" ], [ "> For those who are Orthodox it doesn't impact how one sees their faith, for those who believe in the loss of the original church it can be seen as an evidence of that.\n\nIf one refuses to go any deeper than the surface on their research, sure.\n\n > I mean for Orthodox you hold as an axiom essentially that the church will never fall and that God has given the church once and for all; so literally nothing could impact the faith from within the perspective of the faith.\n\nAny limb that does is severed off from the Body as we saw with Gnosticism, Arianism, Marcionism, Nestorianism, etc.", "320" ], [ "> That's not my experience, though some insular parishes of ANY ethnicity can be so.\n\nIt's obviously not my experience either, however I must listen to people when they say that and those who have recommended OCA as convert friendly. The last thing anyone wants to do is take a gamble and then that person turns away from Orthodoxy all because of a Parish that doesn't take well to converts. Usually the OCA is a good recommendation I've seen many users of various jurisdictions offer to those inquiring.", "529" ], [ "> I mean, this assumes that (1) there were others out there who would have done a better job, and\n\n<PERSON> is perfect therefore He would have chosen individuals who would further His divine plan.\n\n > (2) that He didn't intend to allow the world to go into apostasy.\n\nThat makes no logical sense and negates his promise. If He would allow the Church to go into apostasy so soon He wouldn't have brought Salvation to the whole world then after having prepared the Israelites for the Messiah for so long. Yes, there is free will, however those He chose were for good reason and to say that They would let Him down is saying that He chose unwisely.\n\nAlso, who's to say that LDS church hasn't gone into apostasy and another restoration is needed?", "649" ], [ "The universe is ~13 billion years old give or take. Evolution whether macro or micro is a possibility of the chain of events God put into motion.\n\nAdding: Original sin, or ancestral sin, comes from our level of sentience, choosing free will over the will of God and thus having the inclination to sin. It is something we're all born with generation after generation and can only be healed through the medicine of the grace of God. There was no spiritual death before the rebellion of mankind.\n\nDoes the disagree button pusher want to share their disagreement to a contributing comment?", "787" ], [ "My first civil marriage was a disaster as I married a guy who had been married before and I quickly found out why he had been divorced before. He was a heartless conman.\n\nMy now husband would say yes it's awesome to have a wife but I respectfully disagree. I'm a bit of an adult hellion. :-) It depends on who the woman is whether it's awesome to have a wife or not. Same as with a husband. I think it's awesome to have my husband. I can't speak to having kids as we only ever had cats and they are awesome.", "164" ] ]
392
[ 12780, 11399, 16392, 17332, 15745, 22747, 13034, 9709, 24287, 9830, 4495, 24036, 13146, 5449, 25400, 8681, 21074, 7531, 18777, 18413, 1392, 22848, 25151, 10224, 5522, 17458, 22896, 6582, 1050, 8163, 19185, 9665, 4172, 2969, 13672, 22390, 10211, 19461, 7554, 18633, 22243, 11167, 19489, 6073, 6112, 6779, 13061, 23943, 24821, 23831, 23605, 12182, 17862, 15748, 21480, 13997, 10744, 11297, 9237, 12638, 8322, 16297, 16229, 7626, 6586, 23261, 21273, 11655, 1583, 6234, 12278, 23527, 6317, 13614, 7071, 22053, 2513, 22263, 8573, 11508, 5330, 20424, 2177, 23963, 4802, 15230, 13130, 2963, 24417, 5018, 13856, 8006, 21283, 1449, 20165, 6644, 17980, 20370, 10243, 8887, 21218, 5536, 11274, 20063, 17612, 12661, 15830, 14038, 23834, 25377, 24502, 21627, 17144, 9456, 6435, 6204, 2859, 5210, 18805, 11159, 24028, 5961, 24696, 4571, 19877, 9373, 4910, 11246, 1551, 10828, 5689, 15186, 23561, 1046, 3850, 6878, 17842, 10431, 10147, 1540, 14085, 23702, 19820, 23364, 20113, 18981, 17966, 24081, 1205, 21741, 2633, 16103, 14508, 3071, 737, 113, 20280, 16102, 15158, 22066, 5594, 20619, 10260, 6741, 13834, 19332, 2689, 10335, 23570, 17382, 8897, 2536, 15127, 20614, 5076, 18058, 19613, 8400, 652, 18943, 6872, 16468, 23571, 20339, 4301, 6058, 18362, 9438, 6276, 5099, 18905, 40, 6953, 8157, 4213, 24373, 13254, 8221, 22580, 22, 712, 5142, 18595, 7909, 23820, 1185, 10752, 22900, 6579, 6999, 3210, 5216, 12597, 11580, 10212, 4768, 21291, 12382, 16519, 14275, 19572, 3310, 21689, 17937, 12933, 15420, 22801, 432, 4479, 17502, 6881, 7817, 17404, 6229, 8734, 11837, 18881, 14300, 3453, 4808, 3907, 3041, 10712, 7883, 23242, 1301, 12056, 15931, 10725, 522, 2351, 15684, 13851, 13977, 17711, 2269, 16450, 333, 11565, 13590, 9025, 2156, 3997, 9098, 19256, 6747, 24939, 1370, 20756, 3545, 17421, 21535, 20136, 23307, 3524, 10189, 836, 6528, 8923, 633, 18031, 16364, 22201, 18455, 7369, 13792, 22241, 4981, 6027, 24187, 897, 21077, 24988, 2105, 8863, 15902, 19819, 13984, 13023, 1616, 25070, 683, 1024, 7832, 25404, 21406, 19109, 3011, 14558, 14225, 8457, 21649, 18188, 24862, 33, 17009, 23685, 4012, 16620, 3501, 17387, 12222, 4511, 22519, 19058, 17674, 10931, 13464, 5463, 4985, 19502, 7685, 11516, 9861, 19789, 20316, 7375, 16137, 7668, 24250, 17541, 15939, 21044, 24735, 5397, 17249, 18912, 24759, 3256, 14164, 6277, 9014, 797, 6152, 22833, 11821, 15887, 23977, 22166, 5045, 24308, 3671, 7373, 5445, 6784, 7154, 145, 15475, 5391, 2907, 23786, 14446, 19587, 23207, 1778, 11084, 10022, 1201, 10095, 19727, 16610, 25310, 17450, 4905, 3497, 24010, 8108, 8563, 18469, 9455, 19165, 24261, 10797, 20327, 11632, 1332, 22254, 21602, 2941, 10303, 4, 1794, 14720, 23783, 8204, 6026, 6655, 514, 7273, 2215, 9276, 5571, 1203, 15385, 10598, 12796, 13159, 24590, 19515, 10113, 21285, 17881, 21120, 986, 2583, 17355, 10495, 21543, 10096, 21533, 23579, 9239, 25109, 2772, 9722, 10026, 10813, 24120, 4826, 8158, 7934, 15092, 6321, 1867, 1678, 13698, 2851, 6736, 15043, 3141, 4964, 22713, 14860, 23755, 7946, 3714, 17481, 4933, 16258, 14885, 14627, 19425, 19859, 4589, 20999, 2545, 10172, 22851, 4442, 13953, 6090, 12995, 9323, 11716, 7202, 21619, 5567, 17802, 16277, 17445, 17903, 9548, 5290, 9994, 20858, 20460, 23833, 20330, 13842, 13768, 13635, 7100, 22567, 10245, 4872, 3271, 22103, 11059, 13652 ]
reddit_dump_-Murton-
[ [ "This.\n\nAlso the PS4 uses the FreeBSD file system. FreeBSD is a non-fragmenting file system in which all of the files belonging to a single application are stored physically near each other on the disk vastly reducing seek time. If the PS4 doesn't have a large enough gap to store or update an application while keeping all of its files together it will start copying other applications to other parts of the disk to make that room. Which is why you sometimes get error messages telling you need way more space than game actually needs.", "933" ], [ "The games industry sets a new record for both revenue and profit every single year. If any other industry saw sales growth on the same level as the games industry it would literally shit itself in shock.\n\nThis weird belief that every game deserves to be a blockbuster smash hit of over six million units needs to stop as it's hurting the industry. We have games being developed and released that are little more than slot machines because publishers are hedging their bets with unlicensed gambling as a means of making the profit number higher just in case the game doesn't hit that magic 6 million number (some publishers set that number even higher)\n\nThe industry needs to go back to seeing games as an art form and trying to make the best games they possibly can, good games will sell gangbusters, shit games will not, not every game can be a hit.", "387" ], [ "Fun fact: Sony doesn't own a single one of the CDNs used for PlayStation. They're all third party and out out to tender meaning the lowest bidder wins and we get what Sony pays for.\n\nJune 2015 seems to have been the turning point when lime.light, a very cheap CDN provider increased their market share for PlayStation downloads to almost 50%", "933" ], [ "OP.\n\nYou've been given a lot of information about server side issues but nothing to help on your end. There is a client-side cause for slow downloads.\n\nEvery game and application on PS4 reserves some bandwidth from the network card for itself, this is known as a receive window. This is something that is enabled by default in the SDK whether the game or application requires a network connection or not and the default value for the receive window is too high.\n\nThere are only two effective ways to improve your download speed from your end.\n\n1: put the PS4 into rest mode. This will suspend all applications and allow the maximum bandwidth possible for the download, but then you can't use your PS4 and switching it back on will unsuspend those applications and tank the speed.\n\n2: ensure that no applications are running in the background. There is no way to know if a game or application on PS4 has actually closed down fully, so restarting your PS4 dgouod be your go to troubleshooting step if you want to continue using your PS4.\n\nHonorary mention: pausing and resuming your download can result in you connecting to a different CDN who might deliver a better speed, but that's RNG and it might take several attempts to get a more reasonable speed.", "784" ], [ "It already is an EU law, it's just not being enforced.\n\nIt has always been illegal to run a gambling operation without a license and always been illegal to offer a gambling operation without sufficient age checks to prevent minors from gambling. It's just that nobody really checked whether what the games industry has been doing meets the legal definition of gambling, which of course it does.\n\nThe Dutch gambling authority wants to push for prison sentences to make an example but are yet to detail which individuals they would seek to prosecute as you can hardly place the entirety of EA in prison. My hope is CEOs but they might push for someone of more direct responsibility like the producers of the offending games.", "834" ], [ "Depends how annoyed you are by frame rate stutter I guess. It was a great example of why locked frame rates are better than unlocked. During general play the frame rate will be in the 50s, as soon as things like muzzle flash and grenades appear on screen in the heavier firefights it will tank as low as the high 30s. I found such swings in frame rate to be overly jarring and didn't finish the game on PS4 as a result hoping for an update that either better optimises those effects or allows a frame rate lock, sadly neither of these happened.", "404" ], [ "Unless Sony broke into Epics systems and did it for them (which they didn't) then it's Epic that did the dick move, it's their accounts on their servers after all.\n\nFrom what has been said so far it would appear to be the purchases that Sony is concerned with on this cross account stuff, the wanted Epic to cut the cake and keep the pieces separate, Sony shouldn't be blamed because Epic used a hammer rather than knife.", "161" ], [ "The legal definition of gambling, or to use the specific term that the Dutch are using \"game of chance\" doesn't necessarily mean the prize has to be cash or even be something that can be traded for cash. The prize merely has to have value, and by virtue of the fact you can pay for a ticket on the RNG means the prizes automatically must have the same value as the ticket or greater.\n\nOne of the argument made involved character skins, these are often marked as \"common\" \"uncommon\" \"rare\" etc. The ticket costs an amount of money, to make things easy 1 ticket = 1 cash. Immediately your \"common\" items are now worth up to 1 cash, \"uncommon\" are 1 cash or more, \"rare\" are worth even more and so on. Doesn't matter that they can't be traded or sold or even bought direct, those are the perceived values to the player and that's enough to argue that the roulette wheel that is the lootbox has a \"win\" state where your prize is worth more than your stake. Add in that many games allow you to obtain useless duplicates and the boxes also contain a \"loss\" state, you can now pay money and either win something or lose, that is both the literal and legal definition of gambling.\n\nAs for not being Dutch and not buying lootboxes and therefore it doesn't affect you, that's a big shortsighted. Shareholders to these publishers aren't going to be happy that their new infinite revenue generator has been shut down and the pressure is going to be on to replace the gambling system with something that makes as much money if not more, it's not enough to be profitable in business, you have have growth, if you don't make more profit this year than last then you're a failing company. It's stupid but that's how business works. The lootboxes didn't affect you specifically, but the next thing might, and then the thing that replaces that and so on until the next industry crash.", "834" ], [ "But then Epic agreed to those terms knowing that it would adversely affect users and kept that agreement secret from them. They also sold the game (I know it's free but sold is the only word that makes sense) under the false pretence that progress and purchases were transferable.\n\nTruth is Epic could allow account migration with or without Sony's permission. It's easy:\n\n\"This account has been used on another system and cannot be used on this system. Please click the button below if you would like to migrate your account. This will reset your progress and purchases, your migrated Epic account will credited with the requisite V-Bucks to repurchase your items, we are sorry any inconvenience this may cause.\"\n\nAnd that's assuming that Epic truly can't extract your progress data from their account systems and transfer it to another platform, something we know for a fact they can do because they've been doing it since release day. We also know that they can separate out the purchases because there are PS exclusive skins that PS players can't use on the PC version.\n\nI don't get how despite there being mountains of evidence that Epic fucked up somewhere nobody dare question their involvement in something that happened to their accounts on their servers. It's stupid.", "450" ], [ "First of all, EA don't do progress saved to accounts that they have claimed and demonstrated cross platform linking of progress on.\n\nSecondly even if they did and then added a bizarre block meaning an account used on Platform A couldn't then be used on Platform B that would be EAs fault because, and I can't stress this enough, it is *their* account, *their* server and *their* decision to lock those accounts.\n\nSony have literally zero say on how Epic runs it's accounts and Epic have literally zero obligation to follow Sony's instructions on can or cannot be saved and transferred via those accounts. Sony can stipulate that items bought from another marketplace can't enter their ecosystem but that can be done without locking all accounts to specific platform groups. This is an issue of Epics creation and they should be held responsible for that terrible decision.", "161" ], [ "No it doesn't.\n\nThe servers belong to Epic.\n\nThe accounts belong to Epic.\n\nThe systems that link those accounts to the consoles belong to Epic.\n\nUntil someone can explain why Sony somehow have control over Epics servers, accounts and linking systems this is very much an Epic problem.\n\nThis as as easy as Epic making an unlink account button and enabling a system for transferring the newly unlinked account. They haven't done that, or is Epics lack of action also somehow Sony's fault?", "450" ], [ "They did sort of start the whole unlicensed child gambling craze with FUT though.\n\nWeirdly it wasn't the gambling that people were outraged over with Battlefront but the idea that the lootboxes were the only mechanic for character progression and that the game was pay to win. If they hadn't done that then it wouldn't have made the news and not been seen by legislators across the world who are now waking up to an unlicensed gambling racket that has been operating for years in plain sight and selling itself children no less.", "905" ], [ "I didn't say it was, I said other plays raged about plans for pay to win and ignored the fact that the game was little more than an interactive skin for an online slot machine.\n\nThat rage boiled until the mainstream non-gaming media picked it up, not really understanding games and not having the industry directly feeding them text to print alongside bags of cash and free games they had to do their own research, discovered that game was a combination of the most revered franchise in the planet and gambling. The coverage in the actual proper news caused Disney to become aware who ordered the removal of the evil pay to win mechanic that gamers didn't want due to the brand damage. Meanwhile state legislators seeing the news couldn't care less about the idea of paying real money for a competitive advantage as they had just learned that the gaming industry operates dozens of not hundreds of gambling services without a single license between them and worse, they're actively targeting children as a growth demographic for that gambling.\n\nThis whole gambling in games thing is going to make for some very interesting essays in undergrad law and politics degrees.", "905" ], [ "Buying a pack of trading cards isn't gambling because you know exactly what your getting. You buy a pack of 10 cards and you get 10 cards. You may not need any of those 10 but you have the option to trade with other players that do need them to get what you need. The value is tied to the tangible goods themselves and you got what you paid for. With lootboxes trading is often not allowed and duplicates are worth significantly less than the money you staked to open the box, creating a very definite loss state, meanwhile the item rarity rating creates a win state and the legal and literal definitions of gambling only need you to pay real money for a potential of winning something of a higher value than what you paid based in chance, in essence lootboxes sold for real cash are gambling, they always were and if they're suddenly not going to be that would only be because laws had been changed to make them exempt.", "834" ], [ "But contracts are two way, Epic would still have to give their agreement to those terms which makes them at least partly responsible.\n\nAlso it is very unlikely that Sony has the level of knowledge of Epics systems that would be required to make such a specific request. It is much much more likely that Sony said \"make it so purchases from other consoles aren't available on PS4\" and then Epic put this lazy solution in place rather than find a way that fulfils their brief from Sony while not breaking people's accounts.\n\nAlso let's not forget that the V-Bucks and Fortnite store are both on Epics servers, they could very easily offer a migrate account option that would delete the original account, create a new one tied to the other platform and then credit that new account with the requisite number of V-Bucks to buy back any purchases. But the whole \"nothing we can do argument\" means gamers need two accounts, which boosts the all important monthly active users statistic and rebuy all of their purchases which boosts the all important revenue and profit numbers.\n\nI have designed and run databases where data needs to be changed and migrated across different parts of a department or organisation, the idea that an account can be locked in a particular state and not be alterable afterwards is something that can only happen by design. Someone somewhere made the conscious decision to lock those accounts for whatever purpose and that someone could only have been Epic as they own the database.", "161" ], [ "So your issue is needing to make a second account and rebuy the things you've already bought on a new platform.\n\nNow l wonder who stands to gain from your needing to do this. Let's see, what does Sony gain from you creating a second account for your Switch? Nothing. What does Sony gain from you buying V-Bucks on the Nintendo EShop, nothing. Does Sony lose anything from this, they still have you a PS user, they still have your money from those V-Bucks you already bought on their store.\n\nSo if Sony don't gain anything from you making a second account, and don't directly lose anything from you making a second account, we can only logically say that either, they're not that involved in the situation, or they're just being assholes.\n\nLet's see, is there anyone out there that is involved quite heavily in what's happened who stands to gain monetarily from you having a second account and your intention to make purchases on that second account. Nope, can't think of anyone who matches that description. Well, maybe Epic of course, but they couldn't possibly be responsible, I mean sure, they own the servers, the accounts and the systems that link those accounts to consoles, and they get additional investment from a growing monthly active user figure and direct cash gains from your purchases and could have avoided all this by implementing some sort of account unlinking or migration systems before the release of the Switch version, but even with all of these things being true let's not consider them as part of the issue at all, its that evil Sony with nothing to gain, nothing to lose and no right or access to your account that is responsible. Makes perfect sense...", "387" ], [ "Just to add some industry experience here:\n\nI used to work as a QA tester for a medium sized publisher and was friends with guys in both the marketing and finance teams. I have also been writing my own applcations, business stuff mostly for a couple of years now.\n\nThe way lootboxes are implemented in most game it literally doesn't matter whether people buy them or not. Most games will give you free boxes for leveling up, completing specific tasks or just grinding some gameplay element or another. This means the lootbox, all of its artwork and it's code exist in the game and were part of the games original budget. A few lines of code to implement a delivery system for purchased lootboxes, a quick test to make sure they work as intended and that's it, the rest of the code for their inclusion is simply the same subroutine that is used for earning one via gameplay. In essence, real money lootboxes are free to produce and pure profit. Even if literally nobody buys a single one their inclusion didn't affect the bottom line so they won't be removed, they will however have their importance on the game increased so that they become essential to certain players, ultra-competitive types need them to stay top of the leaderboard or completion is need them for those lootbox exclusive skins or whatever.\n\nBasically, gamers shouldn't blame themselves or each other. The industry discovered a way to produce free money and they abused it and we all ended up here together.\n\nAlso from a financial perspective, even not buying the game at all has much of an effect on the really big games as publishers are paid by selling units to retailers, not to gamers.", "905" ], [ "> Unless I’m mistaken we are still part of the UK so the vote was accepted.\n\nIn that case the UK hasn't \"broken the vow\" because Devo Max might still happen, so there's one of the arguments for why another vote is apparently so important wiped out.\n\n > The argument that we shouldn’t have another vote is one that baffles me really cause I was too young to vote in the last one.\n\nAnd if you have a vote next week and Yes wins should we have another vote a couple of years later for the benefit of the people too young to vote now? And another a couple years after that for the people who couldn't vote then? I somehow doubt that would be agreeable.\n\n\nIt's pretty clear that the Nationalist side have made their mind up and will keep on demanding vote after vote until they win, even by a single vote at which point that will be the end of it and the book closed thrown into a fire. At that point Scotland really should just go the UDI route rather than pretending to pursue a democratic route, because locking the population in the polling station and only releasing them when they vote the correct way isn't exactly democratic is it?", "852" ], [ "Where's 7 years coming from? It only took some parts of the SNP a couple of weeks to start talking about rerunning the referendum and <PERSON> started demanding it pretty much immediately after the Brexit referendum.\n\nSo answer the hypothetical. There's a vote next week and Yes wins, two years later there's a demand for a vote to cancel the Yes result, would you support that?", "564" ], [ "For fucks sake. Damages aren't justice.\n\nGive me a Covid vaccine, a plane ticket, diplomatic immunity and an SAS extraction team and I'll fucking sort it. It'll take a week tops, she'll be in the dock in a British courtroom before anyone even notices she's missing.\n\n\nDisclaimer: I'm obviously not being serious, but let's face it we've properly let <PERSON> down with the way this has been handled. The cowardice of our so called leaders to allow this woman to evade justice without any challenge is fucking pathetic.", "24" ], [ "> that thing democracy\n\nBut it isn't democratic to keep rerunning the same vote because you don't like the answer. You may as well label the choices on the ballot paper \"vote again in a few years\" or \"just stop it with the votes and do what you like\"\n\nAgain, to me it seems that minds of nationalists are already made up and nothing will change them, so why not save everyone the inconvenience of the referendum and just go UDI?", "845" ], [ "Is it democracy though? Option 1 is major constitutional change and irreparable harm to millions of people. Option 2 is keep your calendar clear because we'll be running this vote again in a few years time.\n\nDemocracy doesn't work if whoever is in government at the time can simply say that they don't like the result and discard it.\n\nAlso, I'd like to hear how changing the constitution of a country of almost 70 million people based on the votes of a subset of 4 million is democratic.", "593" ], [ "First of all, don't presume to tell me what my own opinion or position is. Yes I'm Unionist but I'm a democrat first, you had a free and (mostly fair) vote and lost. That result should be allowed to stand.\n\nNow let's look at what you said.\n\n > you don’t want they’re to be another vote because you believe you might lose\n\nHow is this worse or even different to crying for a repeat of the referendum solely because you lost?\n\n > If you can’t vote on the matter because you don’t live in Scotland your views are irrelevant\n\nAh, the \"you're an Englishman so your opinion isn't welcome or wanted\" bit. I'm not just English though, I'm British too. Nationalists like yourself are demanding a change to the constitution of *our* country that we both share while claiming to espouse democracy, and yet I'm not allowed to vote to protect the constitution of my country or to help prevent the irreparable harm that would be befall my friends and family living in Scotland? Doesn't sound very democratic to me.", "852" ], [ "It's something that started as a joke earlier in the story, as I saw the idea of extra-judicial arrest on foreign soil as more likely than agreed extradition or holding the trial and sentencing over there.\n\nBy justice slips further and further away I embellish it further, hence I now get an SAS team.\n\nLet's be honest, my plan has way more of a chance of being agreed by our government than extradition being agreed by theirs.", "24" ], [ "Ad hominem, always the hallmark of whoever is on the correct side of the argument...\n\nAre you deliberately misunderstanding the wider implications of Independence?\n\nWe both live in a country called the UK along with 47 million other registered voters. What you are suggesting is that the constitution of *our* country should change at just a couple of million voters (assuming similar turnout to previous referendum and that the result matches current polling) - that would be a rather extreme case of minority rule, the wishes of 2 million pushed through without even engaging with other 40 odd million. If the constitution for the whole country is to change shouldn't the whole country get a say? That's what democracy is about isn't it?\n\n\nI also see you repeatedly used the word \"England\" where the correct term would be \"United Kingdom\" - I bet you claim you're not anti-English despite that attitude as well don't you?", "564" ], [ "What are you on about? Imperialist? This part of that \"Scotland is an oppressed colony\" shtick?\n\nAnd no, I don't think I should have a say on how Scotland is run as I don't live there, that would be crazy. I do however deserve a say on changes to the UK constitution because I do live in the UK. What is so hard to understand about that?\n\nI'd love to say it's weird that you've dropped your whole \"but democracy\" thing in favour of insults, but sadly it's very common around here.", "852" ], [ "You can view yourself as Scottish, that's fine, everyone has the right to an opinion. Doesn't change the *fact* that you're a citizen of the UK the same as me and we should both have an *equal* say on the constitution of *our* country.\n\nAddressing your double post:\n\nAgain with the imperialist nonsense, the whole \"poor Scotland oppressed colony\" thing, you do realise this is massively disrespectful to people who were colonised right? Or do they go into the same column as the people's who's votes you say don't count because they're also dead?", "852" ], [ "Depends on how the matchmaking service for that particular game works.\n\nIf it's using your PSN ID then it'll be whatever region the ID belongs to.\n\nIf it's hardware ID it will be whatever region the PS4 belongs to.\n\nIf it's game ID it'll be whatever region the game was purchased from.\n\nIf it's IP address it will be whatever region you are physically sat in.\n\nBasically, there's no way to answer this question with 100% certainty.", "450" ], [ "They haven't exclusively picked anything.\n\nMake a new account on Switch or Xbox and then try to unlink it and use it on PS4, the same thing will happen. Surely if it was Sony that locked the accounts they'd be more than happy for people to leave the other platforms for theirs, especially knowing that once they had done so they'd be locked in.\n\nAll I'm saying is, Epic did this, not Sony. Why they did it, I can only speculate. But they are the ones that both own and control the account system, the only ones capable of making this happen and the only ones that stand to gain financially from making it happen. To place the blame for this anywhere but at Epics feet is delusional at best.", "161" ], [ "Not \"not easy\" - genuinely impossible. You can't emulate more powerful hardware and in terms of CPU clock speed, the PS3 is considerably faster than the PS4, 3.2GHz Vs 1.8GHz.\n\nThere's also the fact that the PS3 had more active processing cores thanks to the SPUs, which the PS4 couldn't hope to emulate.\n\nCodebase is also very different, some of the best PS3 games used a process known as \"to the metal\" which means your code speaks directly to the hardware rather than an API, meaning those games would require some recoding to run on a PS4 even if emulation of the hardware was possible.", "933" ], [ "And that's the big question isn't it.\n\n<PERSON> has always had an agenda to make the the non-Open modes invalid methods of play. He's says the figures show Open has the most players but doesn't reveal the figures or how they were calculated.\n\nTotal number of players in all modes is meaningless, what the total hours spent across the modes? That's the figure that would ultimately prove what's what as it would naturally remove board flipping from the stats, but I suspect those figures wouldn't suit his motives.", "430" ], [ "I'm not saying he's fudged the figures, just that he's using the ones that best support the argument he's trying to make, an argument that isn't very popular in certain circles and sets a precedent for game content being removed from select players.\n\nI strongly suspect that the figures he's using are derived from how many players have ever clicked \"open play\" meaning every private or solo player who has ever tried it just once it has ever flipped a board is being included and that's wrong. Total hours played in all modes would remove accidental clicks, giving it a try and board flippers and tell everyone very accurately how the modes compare in popularity.", "221" ], [ "Bad wording in my part. I dun goofed.\n\nWhat I meant was <PERSON> has access to all of the figures, he has chosen ones he thinks best support his argument to remove content from a large group of players, but the numbers he's chosen are very easy to question as he hasn't said how those numbers were acquired.\n\nIf I wanted to claim that a specific mode has a majority I would of course use the number of players who have ever launched into open, doesn't matter if they ever flew their ships, everyone who has ever clicked \"open play\" is an open player. If however I wanted to *prove* which mode had a majority I would use the total number of game hours in each mode, that way I can show not only a strong population but a population that is dedicated to the mode, <PERSON> no doubt has that number and knows that number holds a much stronger argument, but does that number support an argument for removal of content from a large part of the community, I suspect it probably doesn't.", "508" ], [ "Pretty much this.\n\nI tried really hard to like Demons Souls and I just didn't. Tried Dark Souls, same result, gave Bloodborne a really solid effort as I love the setting, still didn't like it.\n\nShame really as I'm told the games are great and I did like some of the gameplay, but I need a narrative in those sorts of games. I don't want on screen markers telling me exactly where to go and what to do but I would like an NPC or something to give me an objective and purpose in the game world, just a guy to say \"go into this area, head west and find this monster and kill it\" a map would be nice too as navigating their worlds can be a bit of a pain. Without these the game is pretty much \"wander aimlessly in the area until you either stumble by accident on the thing you're supposed to do or into an enemy several levels higher than you that kills you in one hit can makes you lose your stuff\" and that's not much fun for me.", "239" ], [ "Welcome aboard. The first thing you need to know about Elite is, the tutorials are shit.\n\nThey're good for learning the controls and some of the basics but do nothing for learning how to play the game. The combat tutorials are particularly bad.\n\nDo the tutorials for flying, plotting a course and docking at a station then start the game properly in either private or solo. Do a little learning in the actual game and get some credits together, upgrade or replace your starting ship then go into open for a little while to see how well you get on with Commander <PERSON>. You can always switch back to private or solo if you get sick of being ganked for no reason.", "403" ], [ "My first job, first interview, but it was part time bar work for minimum wage, they weren't exactly picky. Before that I lost count of the number of applications I had sent that didnt even get a response.\n\nMost UK employers don't take the time to contact unsuccessful candidates. Way I see it if you don't have the guts to tell someone they didn't get the job then you're not qualified to employ people full stop, what do these people do when they need to fire someone?", "979" ], [ "I see. Their games do a really bad job of explaining themselves don't they?\n\nI think I possibly went into BB with a preconception that the NPCs were just set furniture again and didn't really do anything useful as that was my experience with Demons Souls, I knocked on a few doors after realising that was a thing and when all I got was some scared noises confirmed my own suspicious and resumed wandering around.\n\nMight redownload BB and try it again. Thanks dude.", "148" ], [ "Regarding \"bricking\"\n\nThis is very unlikely, very much an absolute worst case scenario. Most likely outcome is that you completely corrupt the PS4 operating system making it necessary to complete a full factory reset, and likely a reinstall of the firmware via USB before the thing will boot again.\n\nMy recommendation would still be to complete a proper reset but if you're pressed for time, create a non-PSN user on the PS4 then delete your profile then do a quick initialisation and sign into your PSN account on the web to deactivate your console. This is the quickest way to make you PS4 safe to give/sell to someone.", "450" ], [ "I think you're overestimating how much space the relatively small fan in the back of a PS4 slim actually needs.\n\nIt will be fine, as long as the area is kept clean and free from dust that PS4 will last well into next gen.\n\nWhen Sony say \"well ventilated\" they simply mean don't place it as far to the back as you can. As for the silly seatbelt analogy, a car crash is always going to hurt no matter what, the seatbelt is about reducing harm not preventing it. Sony advice to leave space behind the console however is prevent them being sued someone covers their fans and breaks a PS4.", "493" ], [ "No, this has been done before. A few E3s ago Sony announced that the TV show \"Powers\" would be included in PS Plus. Though that show was part funded by Sony, not sure about Preacher.\n\nPowers Season 1 was also not added to PS+ in Europe, instead it sold exclusively to a number of subscription based streaming services that only operated in single countries. Is this offer global, or is it another SCEA deal that has failed to announce itself as America only?", "933" ], [ "Most developers are private companies, all of the big publishers however are public so you can look those up. Makes for interesting reading, as they show development costs have been shrinking steadily for ten years at EA and Activision while marketing costs have skyrocketed to unsustainable levels, hence stuff like MTs and gambling mechanics existing in every game recently.", "161" ], [ "Nope. I'm all for a cosmetic shop, buy a skin for a dollar or whatever, and I'm mostly fine with random rewards during gameplay, a \"lootbox on level up\" if you like, but as soon as real world cash for random reward comes in, that is gambling and that should require an 18 or AO on the front of the box and a gambling license for the games creators, and that's not a matter of opinion, that's the actual law, it just isn't being enforced.", "834" ], [ "They might if the Dutch Gambling Authority has their way and when more countries realise that the games industry has been running an unlicensed gambling operation and allowing children to gamble for *years* without being noticed.\n\nThe deadline for the games named by the Dutch passed this week so they have started their second investigation now. If the named games haven't been altered to comply with the law then they intend to file for criminal proceedings. Unlicensed gambling has a maximum prison sentence of 5 years, they also have a neat child protection law where if your victim was a child then the sentence for the criminal act is doubled, making this a potential 10 year sentence for whoever the Gambling Authority decide is ultimate responsible, I do hope they cut the middlemen and go for CEOs.", "834" ], [ "Publishers have been spending less money on development year on year for a decade now, EA, the worst offender for lootboxes peaked it's development budget in 2009 and has been spending less on development but exponentially more on marketing since then.\n\nGame prices have also only really remained static in the US. Game prices in the UK for example have almost doubled since the release of the first PS console. You're totally right on the economy of scale however, the market is huge now compared to 20 years ago, the sheer volume of sales has allowed the games industry to see profit growth that would make any other industry shit itself with glee and hire extra accountants to double check that the figures are right.", "387" ], [ "It wasn't at first though, I believe it was added sometime after season 2 started.\n\nIt was a big topic for ages on the PS blog as the EU blog manager had confirmed that it was coming to Europe and then it didn't. Forget which country but a subscription service called \"Lightbox\" had paid for exclusivity in a country meaning until that deal run out they're legally couldn't make it available via PS+ at all, some other countries had similar deals too.\n\nClassic miscommunication between Sony Europe and the rest of the corporation.", "422" ] ]
179
[ 8679, 10859, 12554, 4952, 6787, 14689, 19551, 7108, 1183, 8247, 582, 11494, 15065, 10601, 21295, 6336, 17720, 20374, 17993, 733, 6167, 25125, 4681, 1452, 25468, 10023, 18312, 3537, 12660, 19099, 12561, 4838, 7358, 11247, 12251, 10455, 10881, 19676, 1240, 4818, 11351, 16267, 9551, 24074, 8628, 17213, 16752, 12465, 8629, 22157, 24951, 3790, 23588, 17258, 5553, 8390, 2217, 21252, 3335, 4782, 19127, 21938, 6280, 6108, 2018, 8777, 23086, 3918, 14843, 18982, 20483, 24056, 450, 3468, 11203, 21619, 5693, 2378, 8110, 3131, 18440, 11425, 8853, 5928, 4721, 11506, 15102, 24497, 12988, 11099, 9762, 110, 14162, 4366, 3415, 4377, 2672, 5472, 6141, 10055, 15708, 11913, 9889, 23812, 21388, 2339, 7233, 22516, 3817, 6652, 25516, 8364, 8010, 13028, 13413, 15046, 3478, 8567, 5144, 5430, 22608, 13390, 23306, 25094, 20656, 1698, 8180, 23583, 20613, 12070, 7970, 25342, 4812, 280, 18358, 21500, 337, 12097, 2210, 21328, 21195, 2347, 10839, 23290, 15109, 3579, 21835, 24978, 3484, 22999, 10344, 2942, 19999, 1819, 6450, 19516, 1284, 11191, 18641, 5354, 7393, 1283, 2370, 9849, 4493, 13118, 7864, 11022, 21343, 18235, 17865, 22542, 6656, 16636, 7464, 12132, 23360, 3531, 742, 6500, 22087, 1306, 9296, 1297, 14823, 16433, 19173, 8055, 23019, 830, 11813, 9138, 16141, 14105, 12017, 2100, 9474, 20740, 21153, 11422, 24719, 10175, 9537, 13489, 12921, 9929, 15398, 19380, 23091, 1906, 13957, 24787, 12490, 13867, 9112, 18461, 12013, 7246, 204, 10047, 8358, 10240, 11187, 13206, 24406, 19998, 10805, 18865, 3191, 10688, 18155, 14963, 12537, 13124, 23227, 7341, 2988, 19707, 96, 18951, 1987, 58, 20835, 13279, 13787, 3257, 7863, 18459, 549, 7070, 1920, 19821, 11659, 8878, 12153, 12479, 8057, 18291, 11839, 886, 11352, 16572, 7653, 8581, 4540, 10548, 2487, 9585, 2400, 10705, 20668, 22760, 22052, 1708, 8116, 23278, 13074, 19478, 7229, 25440, 15478, 5590, 3942, 11979, 14280, 9221, 1178, 2843, 6569, 10435, 20349, 17145, 15545, 1371, 3647, 13722, 11699, 4915, 10123, 7567, 17501, 5322, 12165, 23827, 11265, 11569, 20566, 5466, 3534, 7858, 11473, 793, 4618, 3984, 21394, 7016, 24201, 17005, 2748, 11440, 10251, 25064, 17160, 14535, 19293, 6022, 10509, 7173, 846, 22332, 8821, 13869, 18705, 9172, 16114, 5889, 13526, 9800, 24382, 25452, 19451, 14985, 11288, 19926, 20487, 23518, 15210, 23616, 11815, 13287, 21626, 6441, 12443, 8052, 7086, 14807, 3295, 8447, 24851, 16885, 11965, 20828, 593, 18069, 10519, 8939, 16010, 14603, 5192, 9124, 11834, 5999, 25347, 22059, 24867, 1009, 8626, 20510, 3367, 14750, 7252, 14906, 13654, 18728, 10074, 16338, 642, 153, 16783, 9547, 17541, 19075, 23172, 5469, 2485, 6962, 911, 10675, 15111, 16711, 10905, 8243, 9936, 7671, 692, 21466, 2690, 11127, 14452, 3140, 22820, 8016, 11100, 9743, 3162, 25446, 1062, 1250, 21972, 17874, 13289, 22702, 13650, 5093, 2329, 7930, 5444, 22020, 15507, 2686, 19071, 7551, 6156, 23284, 3616, 25483, 21067, 250, 12734, 11752, 16912, 1461, 19649, 7318, 5404, 7822, 20469, 5337, 22000, 1649, 21409, 2251, 14802, 20312, 501, 22449, 2820, 7017, 19453, 605, 4348, 3648, 25175, 25062, 13374, 8213, 3665, 15985, 761, 835, 14241, 5078, 1059, 6675, 18338, 18893, 13923, 13532, 1343, 25202, 14030, 14820, 9026, 24296, 21051, 21908, 14609, 5505, 122, 13944, 13498, 10586, 6925, 14118, 11484, 8796, 3359, 24679, 12481 ]
reddit_dump_-Nelly
[ [ "That's not how it works. It was legal and popular to smoke cigarettes in any location at any time. Inside, outside, restaurants, theaters, cars, airplanes, *everywhere*. In states like Colorado with legal recreational marijuana, it's heavily controlled and you aren't allowed to smoke in most public places. There are places where you can smell it, but they seem to be the same places you'd smell it in other states- concerts, college campuses, near a house where someone's smoking inside with the windows open, that kinda stuff.", "568" ], [ "I was complimented on something I wrote in fourth grade, by my teacher. She was so impressed, she asked me, and *only* me, to read my story in front of the class. They were also impressed and getting complimented on schoolwork was something I hadn't encountered before.\n\nI hadn't tried very hard at all. I wondered what would happen if I actually put some effort in. Since then, writing has been like working out, I'm always pushing myself harder to see if I can improve.", "104" ], [ "I don't mind that it's a discussion, I would just like some consistency. I can respect both viewpoints on their own- \n\n* Races should be able to change because the story matters more than the cast's ethnicity\n\nor\n\n* Races shouldn't be changed because that changes the story.\n\nBoth sides can be argued and both have logic behind them. But there's an obvious double-standard. You can make The Honeymooners or Annie with a black cast, but you can't make Shaft or Sanford and Son with a white cast. That's weird.", "660" ], [ "I kind of prefer his middle stuff. Early on, he wasn't really even in his own act. It was all characters like the Hippy-dippy Weatherman. Later on, as he got older, he seemed a bit more angry, and it was as if he was trying to get all the words out more than trying to make people laugh. Both ends of his career are still towering achievements, don't get me wrong; but for me, the best stuff was between the 7 Words era and the late 90s.", "936" ], [ "I was dragged to a <PERSON> concert by an ex. We were front row center because her daddy had money, and I was miserable the entire time. I still can't believe I didn't burst out laughing when one guy pulled out a guitar that looked like it was made of riveted metal with a strap made of a Party City-quality \"metal\" chain, then began fake-crying while talking about America. \n\nEdit- Here's a picture of a nicer guitar on the same chain. _URL_0_", "957" ], [ "I don't remember the company behind the ad, but there was one that started with a man saying, \"I'm a t-shirt and jeans kinda guy...\" who then went on to tell a story about some event he had to go to where he needed nicer clothes, and then plugged the store. It's stuck with me, but not in the way they intended. I only ever wear t-shirts and jeans, and it's pretty much entirely due to that commercial making me equate those clothes with comfort and casual dress.", "179" ], [ "<PERSON> golfed 306 times over 8 years in office. There were 2,922 days in <PERSON>’s two terms. So that’s one round of golf every nine-and-a-half days. \n\n<PERSON> has gone golfing 13 times since becoming president. March 31 is <PERSON>’s 71st day in office. That’s one round of golf every five-and-a-half days.\n\nSo <PERSON> golfs twice as much as <PERSON>.", "826" ], [ "I guess because you eat what your parents raise you to eat, so if they're eating nothing but sodas and candy, you'll probably grow up thinking that's normal. So you end up fat just like them. On the other hand, if your parents are fit and eat well, you will learn those positive habits early and have a higher likelihood of carrying that behavior into later life.", "261" ], [ "Haven't been able to sleep for two days and am seriously thinking about killing myself but I know I'm too cowardly to ever attempt it so really it's just like a happy fantasy, thanks for asking. \n\nI have severe social anxiety, insomnia, and depression which I successfully self-treat with marijuana because I'm extremely sensitive to the side effects of prescription drugs and because none of the medicines I've been prescribed have had any positive effects. Pot is the only effective treatment that calms my anxiety, makes me comfortable with social interactions enough to get through them, and allows me to ever fall asleep. \n\nBut I'm not in a state where it's legal so I have difficulty gaining access to it, and have run out. So now I'm fighting off phonecall-induced panic attacks by distracting myself on reddit but I'm miserable because I'm so tired it feels like my gums are vibrating.", "268" ], [ "\"How will we steal energy?\"\n\n\"Let's try setting a trap in a mall or a nail salon or something. Again.\"\n\n\"Sure, that always fails, but let's do it. Where should we set the trap?\"\n\n\"In the same zip code as all the others, that way we know Earth's only protectors will be nearby.\"\n\n\"Do we want them there?\"\n\n\"No, not at all, they always thwart our plans.\"\n\n\"So why do we only attack that part of Tokyo?\"\n\n\"I dunno.\"\n\n\"Hm. Well, I'm off to try this trap thing again.\"\n\n\"Good. Oh, and by the way, I know I say this every time, but if you fail me again I'm totally gonna kill you.\"\n\n\"Great, in that case I'll summon a random monster which, like a pokemon made of makeup and charm bracelets, can only say its own name and has a horrible gimmick. Also it's easy for a Sailor Scout to beat with one attack. Which is fortunate for them, since they each only have one.\"\n\n\"Cool.\"\n\n\"Cool.\"", "326" ], [ "Smoke from a small pipe and cap the ends after every hit. I use a one-hitter and smoke inside, and unless I just finished smoking, you can't smell a thing. The smoke you breathe out isn't nearly as smelly as what comes off the bud directly, and when you breathe out you can just do it into a folded tissue, a cloth, your sleeve, whatever. Then you either throw that away or spray it with febreeze. I don't even bother worrying about what I breathe out and it still doesn't linger.", "568" ], [ "I don't trust either party, and I don't agree 100% with either of the \"packages\" they offer. The golden rule dictates most of my views. Treat others as you would have them treat you. \n\nI don't want anyone telling me what kind of sex to have or who to marry, so I'm not going to tell gays and lesbians what to do. I would want the freedom to avoid having a child I didn't want and couldn't care for, so I think women should have that option as well. I wouldn't want something taken away from me just because someone else did something stupid with one, so I leave gun owners alone. And so on and so on.", "497" ] ]
5
[ 9450, 16036, 20173, 9461, 4165, 4487, 4926, 18738, 25110, 16435, 24421, 22082, 11169, 14968, 14202, 6653, 23124, 5793, 22223, 9637, 10613, 5329, 12772, 3872, 2933, 3922, 1367, 3760, 6137, 11803, 14181, 11016, 24138, 19880, 9789, 13094, 23526, 24260, 11589, 548, 14074, 676, 23024, 9344, 13530, 23492, 9274, 2089, 20893, 6987, 10116, 25364, 15471, 16167, 25117, 5265, 4352, 302, 10467, 1738, 19312, 13522, 23041, 11831, 6734, 15831, 21229, 2624, 11180, 5783, 17193, 8724, 844, 5988, 13059, 16791, 13763, 23246, 9247, 2164, 12574, 15865, 11147, 555, 20131, 6555, 14797, 13860, 14899, 23767, 24247, 14519, 611, 6873, 6274, 8751, 13698, 2261, 13842, 21222, 18640, 17826, 334, 16987, 14872, 3757, 9603, 3503, 17689, 5572, 8784, 24245, 17439, 15418, 6609, 1323, 3255, 18661, 13876, 18954, 3849, 18604, 15935, 5068, 7524, 367, 18035, 5542, 7433, 4868, 9370, 8994, 11006, 1507, 4850, 21744, 4844, 24503, 24200, 1454, 10658, 11985, 20957, 7144, 9634, 21809, 17331, 4202, 1692, 1884, 15653, 19083, 5129, 22828, 11329, 12493, 851, 14400, 5119, 12867, 6850, 14610, 23597, 18653, 5398, 16387, 18346, 20603, 1248, 23043, 1229, 13534, 22924, 18523, 2909, 10775, 22714, 14626, 19268, 22411, 14937, 25074, 7629, 5385, 10788, 8795, 2512, 19390, 546, 11278, 22099, 17639, 10045, 23356, 10362, 17741, 16029, 16585, 3954, 11900, 1355, 1586, 3089, 3161, 405, 20621, 20147, 20234, 12273, 24331, 7196, 2832, 9238, 12038, 10536, 17599, 6581, 12463, 16611, 5939, 21797, 18127, 14719, 22589, 22354, 9591, 16015, 13348, 9614, 22001, 5018, 19310, 15754, 223, 6709, 3269, 6458, 20268, 8764, 2388, 8394, 8773, 13223, 1165, 16096, 20875, 22362, 12996, 6943, 6880, 14048, 10794, 8619, 23237, 2393, 22440, 17058, 18807, 15818, 23572, 8404, 22237, 8198, 2053, 17962, 24077, 19209, 7003, 11975, 12072, 1253, 8269, 4703, 13583, 10208, 6718, 16876, 7677, 15968, 25051, 24766, 5470, 8410, 1477, 11398, 15688, 15847, 1735, 4208, 19007, 17360, 20812, 5539, 14352, 13120, 22943, 9681, 17970, 12691, 19707, 6646, 3809, 10465, 3804, 11877, 10977, 4267, 6347, 12146, 23826, 7759, 5397, 18553, 21325, 1778, 4004, 10107, 22299, 15435, 1332, 15019, 18301, 11798, 1036, 12460, 22117, 23225, 23169, 3243, 16779, 25193, 21803, 25394, 1948, 2579, 5405, 326, 24686, 13908, 7894, 12681, 6286, 7010, 15983, 12406, 14791, 912, 4480, 14533, 8682, 5718, 11128, 19765, 6415, 25047, 1011, 9408, 65, 23614, 21697, 13683, 14484, 22668, 6723, 3932, 3709, 24632, 871, 24788, 18179, 1670, 4774, 994, 7565, 3786, 15363, 15308, 20326, 25253, 20704, 15375, 12294, 1223, 10697, 16593, 8674, 2137, 7348, 4191, 6320, 10609, 7900, 2040, 17974, 6654, 5171, 11723, 21583, 2300, 11302, 18499, 10842, 15254, 19559, 13019, 13755, 16666, 24192, 23764, 6408, 13029, 20026, 24948, 25511, 16115, 18687, 15425, 10063, 8522, 4125, 23223, 13439, 10777, 8095, 24700, 3259, 14238, 6402, 19699, 22613, 24301, 11348, 13111, 7540, 17482, 339, 4145, 3142, 19103, 11807, 11334, 7600, 16786, 17340, 21224, 13459, 8299, 8609, 4875, 15013, 23692, 11892, 16738, 11559, 2707, 19484, 10651, 20637, 2589, 18364, 8690, 2144, 8838, 8865, 9419, 22745, 19389, 12766, 22103, 20838, 18831, 6303, 12737, 2782, 13179, 11338, 719, 17739, 201, 15271, 23894, 16187, 8528, 9689, 19779, 11095, 14959, 1456, 17757, 11059, 3864, 5610, 1013, 17595, 18914, 23977, 13006, 11468, 6369 ]
reddit_dump_-NotEnoughMinerals
[ [ "Dude. I'm tearing up listening to \"all your'n\" right now. I'm playing that for my wife. I love this line, also:\n\n > The place you learned to say your prayers\n\n > The place I took to praying\n\n > Loading in and breaking down\n\n > **My road dog, door deal dreams**\n\nGreat picture and description there. I love driving long distances and just seeing the landscape. Imagining a guy just traveling alone, his road dog hanging by him out the window dreaming with him. \n\n\nSo I'm not huge on country. I listen to rap a lot (2 12s in my car) but I like all music. I liked *some* of <PERSON> and some good <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, (that destroying the big red pickup truck song is amazing). But that's about as far as I typically go. I'm just digging the the bouncy country bop the body back and forth, a'swangin the beer around stuff. Basically, give me something that is easily digestable/catchy to ease me into it. This <PERSON> guy seems good to me because although I'm playing it in my work truck, it sounds like it's mixed well so it won't be so flat sounding, it'll have some nice oomph in my car (I can't stand playing an old old album or even a new album and it's basically all treble, no low end to it. No oomph)\n\nEdit: house fire is dope.", "213" ], [ "How is that legal? And how do I turn the amp shit off? When I click a Reddit link from gogle I just want it to open up sync for Reddit. Instead I have to click the link on Google, then click the comment amount count and then it'll open my app. If I click elsewhere it sends me to the play store to download reddits shitty official app", "945" ], [ "No idea about the square. \n\nThe frosty mix comes in a large bag weighing maybe 5-10lb. It's like 8 percent milk fat IIRC. Pour a small cup of that before you throw it into the frosty machine and it's the most delicious chocolate milk you'll ever taste. I personally like the vanilla frosty though. It's very rich, and doesn't get talked about enough. Chocolate is chocolate. A good vanilla is impactful.", "559" ], [ "Illinois is largely democratic. It's a blue state. \n\n\n_URL_0_\n\nThere's an article from <PERSON> by basically saying \"my people always vote Democrat..what is there to show for it? We're all still poor\"\n\nThe shootings in Chicago. The relentless homelessand crimes in Seattle \n/Oregon (all blue city), the violence happening there as well...what exactly are Democrats doing besides raising taxes and pretending to be for equality?", "619" ], [ "Before crews started to fall trees along i5 near Northgate (more northish of Northgate actually) you saw these houses several hundred feet away from the freeway with the only thing separating them being the sound barrier walls. Right in the way of the new link line. Now, the surrounding trees are gone and houses (admittingly looking old as dirt) are gone now, too. Just curious how that works out if people live there- does the city pay the owners a large amount of money to GTFO so they can continue, or how does that work?", "904" ], [ "I love the way the 350 and 370 look. It's been my dream car since I was underage, and I'm 29 now. Parts of the 350 I prefer over the 370 and vice versa. I know the car isn't the legend and show off it was *over* a decade ago, and I know the interior is lack luster and it's missing a ton of new tech. But what else looks like these cars? What else has that exhaust sound? (The Infiniti doesn't count. If I'm getting the same car, I want the looks I prefer) I have owned 3-4 90s Camrys, 1 2001 Camry, and now a 2010 Camry. I just want a 300hp manual z. It'll knock the socks off of myself, and it's reliable. That's what I want. \n\nI have never had an interest in the chop tops. They look ridiculous. Destroying the lines. Big ass bloopy messes. Sad to see this is the news. No one is going to buy this. This is the end of the z. I was hoping for another redesign so the 12-17 370z get even cheaper.", "93" ], [ "Thank you bro. I posted this on my local FB audio group and someone suggested a bad ground as well. He said, \"sounds like a bad power problem or ground problem, those Amps shouldn't cut out like this.\"\n\nI said:\n\n\n > I went to xxxxxx, The owner is totally bitchin, and the dude installing my stuff seemed cool as shit, but when I was reading up on it afterwards, I learned this stuff should really be metered and adjusted appropriately, and I don't know if he did that at all if all he was doing was just turning down the gain with lil <PERSON> \"a milli\" bass heavy song until it stops cutting out. I think he even had me blow a fuse at some point because he went back to the shop to replace something. I mean, it was playing fine for the 3 months afterwards, but I know the systems ceiling now, and it seems to be dying out before that ceiling, which is before the *actual* ceiling.", "872" ], [ "Hahaha. Listen here. I would love a Porsche. But I'm a tradesmen getting into journey. I got a wife and a kid. I want a simple fun sporty car to exillerate me and have me loving driving. It's a weekend escape. I also hate spending money and buying cars because it's nothing but money lost, hence why I buy Camrys. The z clicked because it's sporty, was relatively fast, but still knock the boots off my Camry, *and* it's reliable, *and* fun. *and* sexy.", "257" ], [ "You're right. I could buy a nice newer Camaro or mustang GT and accumulate 300-500 dollar payments for the next 3+ years. I prefer to buy my cars outright, or have minimal payments. Word up to $1500, 180k+ mileage Camrys lasting 4 years, or my 2010 with 150k on the dash I bought for 6k from a Mormon 3+ years ago with no major work to it. \n\nI'm not an enthusiast. If I had money to expose irresponsibly, with no wife and no kid, I still wouldn't do it. But I don't deny envying those making those choices because I'm sure it's well worth the cost when they drive. I just have to be realistic and reasonable.", "130" ], [ "This is something I recognize as a person working in a trade and entering into a lot of people's apartments.\n\nYou guys pay a lot of money. And there is no AC. If there is, it isn't working correctly. A majority of the time, there is a limited resources of actually DIY solving- the window setup does not allow it. \n\nI just *really* don't understand how people are paying 1500+ for a small studio, and in the same building 2 bedrooms go for 2500+ and...no ac? That's messed up to me", "932" ], [ "I just went for another drive. Played a THX bass test. It cut out mid way, lower bass. \n\nI rebooted the stereo. Played some other hard hitting tracks but kept it within reason the subs sound like drt on the lower notes. Not cracked or blown. Bottoming own. The low rumble that isn't crisp.", "872" ], [ "My coworker got ticketed after arriving for an emergency service call in seattle. bad luck for him, the rounds didn't play in his favor. He got a 50 dollar ticket. Luckily for us, hell probably pass it onto the boss, and after so many situations of raised parking fees/ticket expenses, the boss will simply just incorporate an extra fee for Seattle area. Which means people who have to pay HOAs or are in apartments will be paying for. Captilism is great. Don't worry yall. Just give us a little more money, lol. We went from 50-70k to 75-110k thanks to yall lol.", "610" ], [ "You're pressing your own subconscious worries about being descriminative onto me.\n\nThere was nothing remotely close to being racist in what I said. Saying <PERSON> is a well spoken quarterback doesn't have to have any extra meaning behind it. Many athletes are poorly spoken. That could be because they simply hate doing interviews and are just there *so they don't get fined*. It doesn't have to be about race, unless you want to be outraged for no reason. \n\nThink about it like this. You assumed I am white (I am, TBH). And you assume black people see a negative connotation with those statements. Just let it be. Treat a black person just the same as you would a white one. That's what they want, and all they have ever wanted. Saying he has a good head on his shoulders isn't like a pat on the head to a child. It's just a compliment. I should never be scared to speak naturally (and inoffensively of course) to a person just because of their skin color. That's what makes you prejudice.", "715" ], [ "I haven't received any infractions for a long time. Last one was in Lynnwood. When I went there, I was behind 30-40 people with driving infractions. Not sure what box I ticked, but I went in there saying I did it, and \"please lower the fine\" basically. So maybe mitigation? Definitely had no lawyer. And didn't see no lawyers in the room. Just people spending their time showing up, and over and over again the judge knocked down the tickets.", "462" ], [ "Why do criminals always do this? You take *millions?* Dude. You bought a 160k Tesla (how? Are the p100 that much? Why not a fucking Porsche or something you can track with?) 1.6m house, I mean, life is good. Why are you thinking you'll never get caught? Shuffle away a few hundred K and view it as a bonus and be done with it. It's *always* the people that *dont* stop. \n\nReally, you make 116k a year. You're already in the winning circle. So stupid.", "314" ], [ "Yes. Because you said \"SLOW DOWNNNNN!!!!!!!\"\n\nDepending on time of day and area where lack of enforcement is, the traffic very well could be going 70-80. And you had *no* reply to my comment where I had addressed the high potential risk of doing 60 when everyone around you is doing 70-80. \n\nYou need to follow the flow of traffic. Period. Maybe that user was lying, and even with a speedy flow of traffic, I'm still not pulling 80. I'll dabble in 75, but I watch it like a hawk and routinely throttle off when I need to (not passing, etc) but even then, I'm still doing 67 just to keep up with the rest.", "523" ], [ "/u/just_add_coffee\n\nThis is exactly what I am talking about. Read it. Nothing but sympathy and empathy for this poor soul. Admittingly, the daughter is being interviewed, so of course that's how she views her father. But it's being published and going to pull strings. \n\n_URL_0_\n\nHe was lighting everything up. This is what I am talking about. It's a different setting when someone is a bat shit crazy leftist. These are the same circumstances of what the Charleston guy did. These people are not different. The only difference is their views. They were mental, and needed help. Risked hundreds of lives. The only difference is, the guy that was right wing was motivated to do it due to <PERSON>'s talk. Clearly <PERSON> wasn't motivated to act this way, with AOC saying these facilities are like concentration camps (which is a quote from <PERSON> who suicided by cop). So, we can blame <PERSON> for the shit he causes crazy people to do...but we don't blame leftist politicians to cause crazy leftist people to commit heinous acts?\n\nEnlighten me", "965" ], [ "Why does every person who is broadcasted on the radio on the radio (99.9 kisw or 102.5 with <PERSON>) *always* have to ask \"hey\" and then radio hosts say \"hey\" and then the caller says \"how ya doing\"\n\nBitch, get to the fucking point. Seriously. You're in the 3rd hour of the show. Literally every caller has asked how they are doing. After the first 5 callers, they start to quickly redirect \"doing fine, what's your experience\". Get the hint. \n\nI just imagine that if I ever called in I would be logically to the point. I'm calling for a reason. The show needs to be entertaining. I don't need to waste 15-20 seconds of delay and common useless questions or statements \"hola bitcholas!!!\"....pause.....pause...\"how you guys doing\" ...\"still just fine per the last caller, thanks\"", "622" ], [ "Yep. Because someone who was left leaning decided to plant bombs and throw bombs as well as hold a rifle. When your purpose is death, what does it matter if it's from vehicle or finger? \n\nWould you say <PERSON> is part of your party? Is that what your party stands for? Do you think an average <PERSON> supporter who simply supported more jobs and better taxes to be a Nazi racist supporter of like <PERSON>?", "743" ], [ "Ok.\n\n\n_URL_0_\n\n > in the the simplest, most popular sense, anti-fascist organizing—often known as antifa—is a militant, no-tolerance approach to far-right, racist nationalism. As a practice taken up by the far left, socialist and anarchist alike, antifa is an illiberal intervention that does not rely on the state, the justice system, or any liberal institution to resist fascism. It finds organization online, in the streets, on campuses—wherever fascism is to be found. Much antifa work today involves exposing white supremacists online and taking action to shut down spaces where fascistic desires get fostered, fueled, and legitimized. Sometimes this involves physical, confrontational tactics\n\n\nIm ready for the que of some Nazi destroying human life equating it to <PERSON> as a reply, completely irrelevant to the context.", "815" ], [ "Only the right is bad. That's why people wearing a black with masks and weapons beat a journalist. But that's a fake story. Haven't seen the hospital records yet.\n\nOnly the right is bad. Driving into opposing political views crowds. The man who blew up his car, exploded bombs, and carried an assault rifle to gun people down was for the greater good saying ICE is bad. Like when you mow down a church. They disagreed. Silly people.", "673" ], [ "Fuck. I know I'm going to get slapped hard for this...\n\n when I read your post before I heard the song (op link dead, had to search the comments) I was dissapointed. It reads pretty typical of today's effort.\n\n\nSo I find the song. It's sounding pretty epic, introspective. Soulful/impactful. And I hear something reminiscing of juveniles [ha](_URL_0_) and I just think...what a waste of an experience. Aura. Presence. Cadence. Not hearing that in the way I expect <PERSON> at his career level and trophy wall. I feel like <PERSON> and <PERSON>, for some two quick examples have all aged well and sort of grown into that undeniable tops in their field. \n\nI'm *really* not trying to push on anybody here. But there has got to be *somebody* who can love an artist but look at a song negatively, but constructively.", "158" ], [ "> could understand idling if Seattle got super hot or super cold and you needed some kind of air conditioning or heat to be comfortable, but this is not Arizona or Alaksa. It's one of the mildest climates in the country, \n\nWe get 83-90 degree days in the summer. That's over 100 degrees in a car. We get 22-35 degree days in the winter. Consider young kids. Pets, and other health ailments that you may not realize for a reasoning why they do that. (although admittingly, that's stretching a bit. The vast majority have no good reason)\n\nAnd if your worry about idling engines destroying the climate, then don't worry so much. The ferry you're using 6-10 times a week probably does more damage than all of those idling cars. Even if the ferry doesn't cause the most environmental damage, were talking about ferry lines. The amount of co2 produced from the 0.0000001 percent of cars on this earth idling in ferry lines couldn't even be placed on a scale in the grand scheme of things. This is a pretty angry article for what results in \"this isn't actually a law. Or a rule. It's just about being considerate and least impactful\" guess they shouldn't start dumping sand into people's fuel tanks. \n\n\n\n\nHeavy note though: I do agree. Don't just sit there idling. It's wasteful. And it is still bad for the world.", "891" ], [ "its 85 out. there is limited breeze. its muggy. regardless if the window is rolled down or not, its still hotter in the car. whats behind you? a car. whats infront of you? a car. whats to the left of you? a car. whats to the right of you? a car. what do all four of those cars have? 1) engine. 2) exhaust. 3) they're likely idling.\n\nyou ever worked at a fast food joint at the drive thru? i have. the temperature radiation from an engine on a summer day *easily* elevated my little drive thru window area up 10 extra degrees. do you know how horrific it is to be at a window where the sun is beating down on you, behind you 5 feet away are 350 degree fryers, and the little bit of breeze you get from the drive thru window actually just sends 200+ degree temperatures from an engine right up to you?", "891" ], [ "You just made a comment discounting what I said by saying you can just roll down the window. I just explained to you how that is ineffective. Now reply back to the topic at hand. Don't be dancing around poking fun about something else I said. Address it. \n\nAnd for the record, first job. 16. 100 degree temperatures, no relief. The little platform was also stainless steel so it blinded you. It was horrific, and not worth 7.15 an hour.", "428" ], [ "That's gate keeping. They don't have to reside in Seattle to have an opinion of Seattle.\n\nMaybe they lived in Seattle for decades and just recently moved. Maybe they work in Seattle everyday, where they spend the majority of their time. Maybe they are up to date on every policy and article pertaining to Seattle.\n\nWhy is it an exclusive club? It's not. Anyone can post here. And it's fine if they speak about anything they want pertaining to Seattle.", "644" ], [ "Some high up tech analyst on Kiro radio this morning was talking about Google/FB and their influence in elections. They said that if they only sent out reminders to vote to Democrats specifically, that could gather 400k+ votes. This was said at around 6am, so details are hazy now, but essentially they said they did this. And apparently you can verify that online now? And they can do it again. Or something like that. The main point home was, things like this are completely subliminal. No one would know those ads or statements were made to *only* one party or that they were even being advertised to. \n\nIt just scares me. Last year was Russians, no one knew it until it came out. Really, with the media, what is actually even true anymore? No click bait. No hyperbole. No word of mouth. No major interests. Does it honestly even exist anymore?", "103" ], [ "> Your ability to craft a sentence is questionable at best\n\nWell to start off, you referenced OP. The comments were taking about the user verylittlefingers. But I was trying to tell you that your comment delivered fair points. What was my last English teacher? Well, firstly, I've been drinking. Secondly, I don't proof read. Thirdly, I'm texting. And the last- what does it matter? You think you would know my English teacher? I left high school (regrettably) at an early age. However, I have my GED which I scored well at. And in my adult life I have managed to land a consistent and well paying job, which afforded me a 12 year old house, a wife, and a child. I have no car debt, and no student debt. Pretty great odds considering both parents were addicts. \n\n \n > Grammatically, this sentence is missing a beginning. Responding to the core statement you posited, Facebook data is a poor way to verify location (among its other flaws), as its the same self-identification as here on Reddit.\n\nYou're getting boring. And the difference with Facebook is, when you ask to join a private group, you typically are verified. That means you are asked several questions. Ie- what cross streets are around you. Do you live around here, etc. Obviously anyone can bypass this...but as I'm sure you'd understand since you're way smarter than me with much better grammar literacy, you can agree it's *slightly* better than a random person making a random username and deciding to post in this sub. \n\n\n > Yes, and what happens outside Seattle also affects Seattle. Doesn't mean we get to bud in and demand < insert local police force > operate differently, given we have no interaction with them or their jurisdiction\n\n<PERSON>. It's a damn internet forum.This is the only city oriented subreddit I have been in where you're all anal about credentials. It's stupid. These are just random people. It's a glorified Facebook community group. What they say doesn't matter. Or it does, cause they can vote since they live in the city. Pointing out so and so doesn't even live here is meaningless. If they don't live here, they have no power of voting. So what does it matter?", "611" ], [ "Yep. Smoked a big bowl and watched my last episode. Left in a pretty upsetting mood. Really said <PERSON> died. I didn't like that at all. I also thought the way he died was weak- could he simply not leave the area? Does he really have to sacrifice himself? Can't he start running away from it and go where the mom is? Like, before she turns the switches?\n\n\nUltimately, I would love to revisit season 1 now, just for nostalgia and them being young and and \"simpler\" times.", "522" ], [ "> You could go farther if you had a better mastery of the English language. Large blocks of poorly formatted text are annoying and frustrating to read, and your consistent overuse of periods breaks up the idea you are attempting to convey\n\nNo. \n\n > Clue in, **your missing** the first half of your idea there, and are hoping the reader will infer it.\n\nMy what?\n\n > This ain't NextDoor, feel free to check out /r/Seattle if **your so annoyed** by us locals not liking nosy neighbors trying to tell us how to do things\n\nMy what?\n\n > Reddit is not Facebook, nor is it meant to be used like Facebook.\n\n[ok.](_URL_0_)", "945" ] ]
355
[ 4733, 19908, 10702, 19910, 9368, 7593, 11248, 1864, 12576, 25356, 1425, 2441, 7829, 6026, 7075, 6408, 3779, 4321, 17625, 10176, 8619, 22176, 15930, 7676, 20765, 9938, 17592, 20927, 17580, 4996, 21191, 4718, 6466, 20371, 19425, 5518, 8151, 5388, 15429, 12374, 25051, 10214, 10704, 2573, 4653, 15470, 20236, 13868, 16104, 11133, 6718, 7701, 14164, 20499, 25166, 10017, 6531, 4171, 6095, 4524, 23790, 17465, 16522, 17374, 14777, 22411, 20617, 3824, 24025, 10785, 24226, 24511, 3230, 14555, 24788, 25341, 15757, 11183, 9539, 1673, 20251, 20024, 19050, 6813, 23685, 8124, 8186, 1941, 13822, 22326, 15624, 5040, 9245, 8502, 5953, 12770, 21798, 915, 2622, 10446, 12034, 12060, 20794, 10597, 11537, 9509, 17399, 21909, 13240, 8884, 9455, 19113, 14919, 11059, 1462, 410, 19172, 15504, 1895, 712, 22438, 1594, 4711, 362, 18090, 24188, 21100, 10932, 10437, 21058, 22688, 20663, 13477, 14326, 12347, 20330, 18897, 145, 13314, 10136, 1851, 2127, 14411, 9752, 3138, 6005, 1845, 11820, 10550, 17788, 4656, 14518, 7192, 25433, 6685, 11400, 21036, 12289, 10006, 647, 7710, 23955, 8690, 14011, 441, 19377, 17737, 16996, 6134, 22188, 20070, 20531, 12090, 2633, 13014, 3762, 13321, 14885, 23579, 22740, 7946, 5969, 13311, 17466, 861, 15658, 17111, 11762, 17079, 11942, 18436, 1786, 18940, 20387, 9630, 16924, 14331, 21043, 3806, 5960, 10614, 6648, 11456, 17656, 6877, 25232, 10315, 10011, 21004, 19834, 22627, 9244, 22983, 9665, 432, 15516, 21549, 19759, 11489, 1981, 3356, 6250, 20923, 3903, 25049, 17098, 25037, 11851, 13628, 2460, 6286, 9599, 9194, 4824, 15403, 21325, 3288, 13559, 10110, 9677, 5908, 15017, 7677, 17103, 23902, 14460, 25394, 17431, 17365, 21961, 4948, 12794, 20457, 22183, 8123, 2398, 9833, 9635, 1207, 22030, 18302, 5804, 8686, 679, 3442, 20662, 16906, 17017, 10208, 5946, 20098, 1892, 18435, 18631, 24120, 4293, 2905, 19906, 3507, 7221, 24263, 3990, 6797, 9110, 397, 24682, 931, 7655, 24115, 18421, 19027, 10600, 6052, 5348, 17415, 15655, 654, 17049, 9674, 4872, 14352, 4177, 10763, 20603, 2404, 14526, 19026, 1670, 22475, 23408, 13365, 7874, 5035, 971, 5387, 23029, 12364, 4545, 2454, 4020, 3364, 6029, 18341, 11555, 4313, 25082, 22024, 2362, 13698, 6265, 2782, 9258, 5939, 23151, 17421, 25362, 16101, 10845, 17668, 21785, 8790, 8059, 4971, 2448, 13308, 24043, 21958, 5769, 9325, 15509, 19666, 13480, 14920, 23078, 15646, 8200, 18346, 792, 20253, 10263, 8518, 2283, 547, 21104, 16462, 3577, 21667, 25297, 23173, 25380, 6545, 18717, 4849, 13355, 723, 5941, 9392, 9968, 15395, 3603, 2579, 21705, 20191, 10776, 363, 7807, 17612, 23393, 25018, 9866, 3747, 1763, 25265, 23187, 2129, 3495, 14508, 12539, 16119, 6272, 2837, 11928, 493, 9628, 13086, 1458, 17475, 13029, 19693, 18971, 4089, 24964, 19037, 303, 3247, 25096, 17847, 5043, 4269, 2109, 13808, 7995, 13578, 12467, 3857, 9248, 13197, 25066, 9612, 24261, 19038, 20665, 372, 2642, 5821, 16882, 15849, 6728, 25334, 3009, 18715, 21460, 4568, 586, 11236, 11957, 18628, 12119, 13917, 2776, 22535, 5068, 18991, 4744, 3711, 19852, 5216, 25508, 18432, 8067, 4582, 1479, 2137, 10119, 14505, 23271, 22997, 22050, 21143, 4513, 22022, 15529, 18336, 15925, 18442, 25514, 10727, 1586, 20900, 10100, 15885, 4844, 19133, 84, 21136, 6886, 12597, 17928, 22178, 2591, 25097, 22635, 1093, 12843, 1024, 14080, 18340, 22194, 20713 ]
reddit_dump_-P5ych-
[ [ "I know, but I find solution best described as \"self-ghettoization\" -- spacing ourselves away from the greater society to create our own bubble. Meanwhile, the ones promoting censorship gain a platform to speak from every public space to promote their message. By combining their message with censorship of opposing view, they become the only message to be heard and thus saturate the public with only one mode of thinking. After that happens, it will be only a matter of time before any space we made for ourselves get's taken away as well.\n\nWe need to be out there in all the public squares making our voices heard, and we need to fight for the ability to do it.", "633" ], [ "> Being kicked off of a platform doesn't mean you don't have the freedom of speech.\n\nRule #7 of this sub is \"don't defend the indefensible: \"private corporations, like governments, are capable of restricting speech. The removal of any material for any reason is censorship\"\n\nThis has been discussed many times on this sub, and it's been said to be a distinction without a difference. Censorship is censorship whether by private or public institutions. The argument you make is more often made as an excuse for promoting censorship. \n\nIf free speech is good and censorship bad, then there is no difference on whether it is a public or private institution that does it.", "865" ], [ "We have comments on this post by user <PERSON> who is going to provide me a demonstration of action. <PERSON> said,\n\n > You're support of speech which is leading to violence is going to be the reason speech is further regulated. You want free speech, attack the conservatives using it as a brainwashing's tool for radicalization of terrorist. \n\nSo essentially, they are saying we should censor conservative ideas to protect free speech. No <PERSON> -- we protect free speech by protecting the expression of all ideas, including conservatives'. If <PERSON>'s criticism was just of conservatives, that their ideas are terrible and they are bad people, that should be absolutely be allowed -- but they are calling for their silencing, and that is something we cannot abide. \n\nIn full transparency of my actions, and without malice or anger, I will be be reporting <PERSON>'s comment after one day with the goal of having them banned from the sub. I would claim they are possibly breaking rule #7 of this sub, but even if the mod's don't agree, I will argue that we need to change the rules to ensure that support of censorship not be allowed on this sub; that the only thing that should be censored is censorship itself.\n\nThis action should be replicated in all subs on reddit, in social media, in forums, and offline in our offices, our schools, our media, and our private lives. Administrators in these areas should be pressured to create \"free speech policies\" that will protect the people who want to express ideas, and punish the censors who want to silence them. We should not let the \"paradox of tolerance\" lead to the destruction of free speech.", "865" ], [ "That makes sense, now that I know AHS was involved, I know then that it could be every single LBG in support of that sub, but if AHS wants it torn down, it will be torn down.\n\nThat sub is a blight on the universe. We are all tired of their bullshit as they have come after so many. That they are now targeting specifically LBG groups, or these new \"superstraights\" is a new one to me. They have previously gone after or tried to go after every remotely rightwing sub on reddit, and even some that were not political, but still in some form or fashion, ticked them off. It is terrible they are just extending their target list, but I expect nothing less than pure evil from that sub now.", "728" ], [ "I remember this all from history education back in elementary and the high school level. Small, biological families were the first units. Some tribes actually started as just large biological families. The idea of tribes with multiple unrelated families came a bit later, but for a time, there were so few humans on the planet that they even had trouble finding enough of each other to do that. \n\nI am kind of just regurgitating what I remember from my history books given to me and I don't have any strong interest whatever the case was. If you really want to dispute the topic, take it up with my old history books. \n\n > Humans are like wolves \n\nEvolutionary science says we are closest related to bonobos monkeys and chimps. I don't know where people like to make a comparison of dogs to humans, but that's just scientifically false.", "931" ], [ "A popular view these days is that a lot of politics is not on a spectrum, but a graph. The [political compass](_URL_0_) is such a graph with four quadrants making up the dominant political orientations. The *x* axis designates economic ideas, whether free market or collectivist; and *y* axis designates authority, whether society is socially free or controlled by a strong governmental authority. As some examples, libertarians are said to be in the bottom-right part, communists hold the top-left, conservatives might be anywhere from exactly on the right axis, to a little higher, and fascists are really high, but people debate on whether they are centrist economically, rightwing or leftwing economically. \n\nThis graph is not perfect and doesn't provide all information, but it is more useful than a single, flat line.", "285" ], [ "Fun fact though, [South Korea spends more money per capita on porn than any other country on the world](_URL_0_). An article with more recent data from the Japan Times confirms this and mentions Japan as a very distant second place. It's behind a paywall though so it felt useless to link.\n\nWhatever laws are in place to ban porn sites there, I don't think they're very effective.", "518" ], [ "Japan's definitely odd in this way, but one thing that might explain it is a particular cultural mindset unique to them. I've read about this in some places, and even had it said to me from family and friends who spent time there. There is a great deal of separation when it comes to things like porn (but it can be other things too). What you do in public is going to be looked at very heavily and pressured to conform with social norms, but what you do in private is going to be a lot more acceptable. And if you are going to bring any weirdness in public, it's got to be more discreet and off to the side. \n\nSo when you have a very conservative society, but you DO have an outlet away from it available to you, I guess you put much more energy into that outlet, and that explains why some of Japan's tastes can be a little...interesting.", "709" ], [ "> Missionaries flooded the country and one of the many things they really pushed was enforcement of the basically forgotten Article 175 of the Criminal Code of Japan, aka, the pixelated dicks law. \n\nSo it was missionaries influencing the creation of the law? Well that gives me an idea! We can offer the rational to Japan that the porn pixels are because of western, christian influence in their country, and so you could spin this into a nationalist issue and you could even get the conservatives on board with repealing it!", "655" ], [ "I don't know what made you think that. These are considered very conservative socially and in fact, communism has probably helped make them more so. Some of the messaging is that communism is about community, and the only way to make strong communities is to have strong moral values. So thus, porn is banned, sex outside of marriage is discouraged, and only wholesome family friendly entertainments are promoted.", "518" ], [ "I don't think you understand when we say the words \"cancelled\"\n\nWhen you get fired, harassed, your voice muted on all media, your home and property vandalized, your children spit on, you're physical wellbeing threatened, and your demographic discriminated against, then you will understand what it means to be \"cancelled\". \n\nBut don't worry. Its not a cultural thing. Its just reality. Progress. Don't be afraid when things change or come to an end. It be will okay.", "828" ], [ "I read your text, but I really want to focus on your last paragraph. I am so glad to find someone anywhere on the left who understands that concept. I bring it up occasionally in other circles and you would not believe how \"live and let live\" is so alien to some forms of leftwing thought. \n\nA month or so ago, I was in r/SocialismVCapitalism trying to tell a self-proclaimed communist this: \"we don't have to fight, we can neighbors -- friends even! I want a world where you can practice you're beliefs without interference, if only you can just allow others to do the same\", he basically said that all other beliefs are mutually exclusive to communism -- that he can't be a true communist or have it unless everyone else is the same as him. Needless to say, it was very disheartening. I am just glad to hear someone opposite of me understand that concept where recently I've been experiencing a failure of understanding.", "870" ], [ "The AHS crowd likes to frequent r/leapoardsatemyface where they revel in the pain of people who got hurt by their own political side: \n\n\"I never thought [**leopards**](_URL_0_) would eat MY face,' sobs woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party.\" -- *from the about page*\n\nYou're right AHS, no one ever thinks their face will get eaten...until it does.", "272" ], [ "You cannot stop them from affecting your life. If you do nothing and ignore them, that won't stop them from coming from you. You will still have to engage with the world when you work, when you shop, when you socialize -- and when you least expect it, \\*bam\\*, you're in their crosshairs and your life is ruined.\n\nDon't believe this can be a true story? [Listen to the innocent souls who were just doing their jobs but who's lives were destroyed by a privileged black princess who used the color of her skin and the false accusation of racism to put them in the national spot light.](_URL_0_)\n\nThe article I gave also lists others who stay silent for fear of saying anything or doing anything that will make them stand out. To say that free speech lives well on American campuses would be BS.", "987" ], [ "> My hope is that as the ideals of Wokism become more and more unhinged, the ideology of those who have been deplatformed will come to resemble my own\n\nYou have made a serious miscalculation. \n\nIt is taking them further and further away from anywhere close to your ideology. I associate with the right, and I definitely have my ears towards conservative media in all forms. Where once a thought of compromise could have existed towards the left, it has been replaced by pure disdain for even the slightest form of leftism. Some have even felt pushed to associate with actual neo-nazis and racists. \n\nA serious miscalculation indeed.", "965" ], [ "So if those who were claiming to be gay were talking about how much they hate women, they aren't actually gay? \n\nThey can bash women to the moon and back, for a hundred years, and that wouldn't make them not gay. Only if a gay man actually had sex with a women is it proof the guy wasn't really gay, not what they discuss. \n\nThat the topic of conversation allows you decide the sexual orientation of a person is a failure in logic.", "640" ], [ "> The sub you mentioned literally says in the sidebar it does not support hating on virgins who are not incel\n\nLOL and AHS has rules against hate on their sub. Read the actual material posted there and on others like r/IncelsInAction and see how there is no thought to a distinction made. No one clarifies their words and generalities are made all the time.\n\n > and until the hate will spill onto hating virgins as you claim \n\n And they are. Go to subs like r/ForeverAlone or forums like [_URL_0_](https://_URL_0_) which play host to many virgins (but not all are) and claim to not be for incel types, and you will hear stories how the hatred of incels has shaped their real life experiences for the worst.", "244" ], [ "> That doesn't ever happen.\n\n\\*LOLs while gesturing towards AHS\\*\n\n > Go look on any left wing subreddit and look for people supporting <PERSON>, there's always comments that are left up \n\nCan I find some? Maybe. Can I find many? Not at all. Can I find numerous posts about the banning and censoring of conservatives by the left? Tons.", "965" ], [ "> mean that's cool, they probably got banned for breaking rules, not being right wing.\n\nIf you actually heard the specific cases when it happens, you'd know it's because they were banned for being conservative, or maybe you wouldn't because you already believe they have a problem with things like transphobia and homophobia. The left calls all conservatives these things all day by default, so big surprise that you think they have a problem with that. \n\n > [r/conservative](_URL_0_) bans you specifically because you are left wing. \n\nOr maybe because they broke some rules.\n\n > Also left wingers aren't the one constantly crying about \"cancel culture\" and \"safe spaces\" \n\nOf course they're not, because it's the left are the ones doing the canceling and enforcing the segregation, I mean safe spaces. Why does a banner need to feel fear about getting banned? They have as much to fear as a carnivore surrounded by their fellow carnivores, the animals they hunt though would definitely have a bit more to feel anxious about.", "965" ], [ "> Right, but no one cares about their sexual orientation.\n\nI do. You should do if you're going fly the green flair.\n\n > Reddit doesn't have rules against having a particular sexual orientation -- it has rules against transphobia and misogyny. \n\nFrom the reddit rules page: \" *Reddit is a place for creating community and belonging, not for attacking marginalized or vulnerable groups of people...* Marginalized or vulnerable groups include, but are not limited to, groups based on their actual and perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, immigration status, gender, gender identity, ***sexual orientation***, etc...\"\n\nThose who were referring to themselves as superstraight had experiences of being attacked for not wanting to date or sleep with trans. They would not be allowed the right to a preference and so described what they were as a gender orientation. That you think it is made up goes against EVERYTHING LGBT activists have been fighting for for years. It really is shameful.\n\n > If the gay subreddits post nothing but misogyny, they'll get banned. \n\nI know you are libleft, so you don't understand the words \"free speech\", so I won't even go into why they should be allowed to say whatever they want. But as to the specific claim that a gay subreddit would be banned, no they won't, you know why? Because there is a double standard here at reddit that winks at some punishes others. r/FemaleDatingStrategy, r/IncelTear, r/AgainstHateSubreddits, r/TrollxChromosome, r/FragileWhiteRedditor, r/BlackPeopleTwitter, r/whitepeopletwitter, to name just a few, have all contained a lot of vitriol for people with immutable characterstics to rival and surpass anything on that was said about trans on r/superstraights. If the rules are applied in one case, but not the other, it is an unfair system and you should be angry about that. But instead, you probably won't advocate for any of the subs I listed to be banned claiming they do nothing wrong, but you do insist r/superstraights did. I wonder what it feels like waking up everyday knowing that you're a little dictator on the internet. The power must be intoxicating.", "126" ], [ "Are you accused of transphobia for having a Marvel preference? If someone did, you might think differently about what you're saying. And the force behind those accusing the r/superstraights did not acknowledge their preference, and instead, accused them of transphobia when those preferences didn't correspond to their desires. They also had the institutional power to shut down their sub and get a GoFundme to block their charity activities. Would any DC fanbase do that? *Could* any of them do that even if they wanted to? No? Then maybe there is something disgusting about what happened to r/superstraights.", "847" ], [ "> Except that's not what they're doing\n\nThat is exactly why they were created and what they are doing, and every other suggestion you made to them not being that way is false. Any actions done by them to claim they are not that are just hollow gestures so that they claim they aren't just misandriest hate group (I've read some of those discussions in the past, I could not believe how many responses to any good faith requests for advice was met with \"stop being the problem\", \"stop feeling entitled\", \"be less of a man\". I hardly ever saw empathy, understanding, or an acknowledgement that anything going on was not their fault. It always was. Even in an place it claims to be wanting to help, it's hatred shows) \n\nYou don't see it because you are wholly swallowed by one side of every view point, and like a trained little child, you're brain will not recognize the hate and vitriol that flows from those subs and how it generalizes to all virgins as a result.", "16" ], [ "> is a pretty shit argument when most commenters in your subreddit are likely not mods of other subreddits and therefore have no control over such nonsense \n\nI hope you realize I wasn't just talking about reddit subs.\n\n > I think that just radicalizes people.\n\nOr, it will teach them a lesson about consequences. You do \"A\", you get \"B\". That this has been gotten to the point that it has is the left has been able to proceed in almost all in it's efforts without consequence. It is time we show them that can no longer be the case.", "126" ], [ "> They really dont have any influence\n\nThey pulled a sub they don't like off of reddit that had tens of thousands of members, and they got GoFundMe to pull their charity page for a women's shelter of their account. That's influence.\n\n > both sides knows that everyone is allowed to fuck and not fuck whoever they want\n\nExcept the trans who called people out as being transphobe when those people didn't want to fuck them.", "847" ], [ "> That's what it's like for everyone participating in American politics right now\n\nNot for the grand majority of the American political left who say and do the worst things and hardly every face consequences. You don't believe me, but then you really are safe in your little bubble, that you brave a big bad rightwing website makes me laugh. Are you're prefered leftwing platforms in danger of being banned, or having their servers dehost them? No, no you do not. You are safe in your little bubble protected by enormous institutional power, which you use as much to defend yourself from consequences while attacking others. I don't know about you, but I call that the markings of an oppressor. \n\n\n > But making a subreddit to bash transgender people is both contributing to overall toxicity and is against Reddit's ToS. \n\nThey did not make the sub specifically to bash trans. They're declared sexual preference and orientation was twisted to be interpreted as transphobia which they were accused of simply to get their sub banned (but the CP posted by AHS helped too I bet). And I have listed to you several subs that generate tons of toxicity and are against reddit's ToS, but are not banned. They happen to be all subs that promote things you like, so you are a hypocrite to say you even care about reddit's ToS.", "728" ], [ "I believe any post I could produce will be dismissed as \"not biased\" by you. This is because you make a distinction between incels and virgins, and I claim, they don't make that distinction in their regular activity. You can point to the sub rules and the advice post, but as I've already said, any actions done by them to claim they are not that are just hollow gestures so that they claim they aren't just misandrist hate group . And the fact you say you haven't once seen it shows a mental disconnect from interpretation I don't think your exercise will remotely correct. And even if I agreed to your faux attempt at understanding, I can't go to those subs.", "244" ], [ "> It's endless self-pity and absolutely no sympathy for others.\n\nDescribes the left perfectly, no wonder people are so tired of your bullshit that they get to the point of wanting to strangle your necks.\n\n > Not that beat up about it. \n\nYeah, because you have a hundred other places to go. The ones for people who don't want to be you have precious few places to feel safe from your side.\n\n > Every post was mentioning transgender people. The sub was obsessed with transpeople. Specifically, with talking negatively about them. \n\n1. r/inceltear has every post about incels/virgins, the sub is obsessed with incels/virgins. Specifically, with talking negatively about them. We should ban them too by your logic. \n2. Transpeople were specifically targeting them, so of course they would talk about them, but the sentiment was about claiming their sexual identity and preference, something that apparently couldn't be respected as the sub was banned.\n3. Free speech\n\n > let's go post by post. \n\nAnd I already said you are too brainwashed to consider anything I show as breaking ToS, even though I believe I could show several. Also, I said I can't go to those subs already.", "244" ], [ "> Are you an LGBT activist\n\nI am a libertarian type, so by default, yes. And greater than you it seems as I actually support the preferences and orientations of all people. Something you can't seem to do by wanting r/Superstraights gone.\n\n > And I'm willing to go post-by-post \n\nI will not be drawn into your useless faux attempt at understanding. A better use of time would be to bang one's head against a door in comparison.", "418" ], [ "> I don't want them gone. I want them to follow the rules. \n\n They would never have followed the rules according to you by virtue of them being calling themselves superstraight. You're side does this all the time. Are you white? Racist. Does matter what you say, it will be racist. Male? Sexist. Does not matter what you do, you are inherently sexist and will always be. Superstraight? Transphobe. \n\nAnd let's say it again to the high heavens. The rules are shit because: Free Speech. \n\nBut even if I agreed they were being transphobic and you claim you wanted them to follow the rules, then you would support the banning of things like r/inceltears. But you don't so you know, you're a fucking hypocrite. \n\n > evidence. \n\nWhat I claim is evidence you will claim is not, and all we will have proven is your a brainwashed little shit who loves oppressing people.", "16" ], [ "> Do you want to strangle my neck?\n\nDo you want to strangle mine?\n\n > They can feel safe in literally any subreddit. \n\nI am one of those people, and I do not feel at all safe in many, many leftist subreddits. I am not alone in feeling that way. Why did you create such uninclusive environments? Oh that's right, it's because you're a racist, a sexist, and generally hate anyone who is not like you. Fucking oppressor.\n\n > Do you really think the terms are synonymous? \n\nYes. One's an definition and ones an insult of that definition. Learn English.\n\n > Because the sub doesn't \n\nYes they do.\n\n > and they make that pretty clear. \n\nThey lie with a few rules on the side of their board that they don't believe for one second. They speak their truth in the everyday comments. Their truth is their hatred. \n\n > I somehow doubt the transgender people started this. \n\nAnd yet how do you explain the GoFundMe page that gotYou underestimate the zealous hatred of your side. It energizes them to be very quick. \n\n > Unless you want to say that transpeople have been targeting them before the subreddit was even created. \n\nAnd they posted that many times. [Here you go.](_URL_0_) All before the sub was even released. Not that this is going to do much good getting into passed your programming. \n\n > Uhh, they're public \n\nI can't go in them. I won't explain further. \n\n > And you could be too brainwashed to consider my points. \n\nNope, you are the only programmable peon here. But even if I was brainwashed, I know I have been hurt, personally hurt in my life by your fucking ideas made realized. Others did it, but you support the ideas that enabled them, so thus, you and all others on the left are guilty for hurting me. Through a brainwashed mind, nothing is still more clear than pain, and I know who did it, I know why, and I know what justice would be to satisfy it.\n\n > Why? \n\nBecause we don't have time, you got to go work! Pucker up shithead 🍆💦", "272" ], [ "> Right, so you're attributing things to me that I didn't do\n\nI'll break it down for your two-year old level intellect. You have evil ideas, other people share these evil ideas and go do evil things because of them. By you supporting the ideas, you support the evil actions, and thus have the evil attributed to you. See how you're a bad bad person? You should do the right thing and punish yourself...with a cactus 🌵. \n\n > Nothing in your link mentions anything about superstraights, supergays, superlesbians, etc. \n\nFUCKING BINGO! I present you a HUGE list of the hate straights, gays, and lesbians have received for wanting to assert their orientations and preferences. I mean the stuff posted in that link is toxic as fuck! And then you say, \"well, Nothing in your link mentions anything about superstraights, supergays, superlesbians\". This kind of hate MADE people started adding the \"super\" prefix, it is the reason they started a sub to share their experiences, to let eachother know that they were not alone in those shared experiences. That you don't see that is sick. And you wonder WHY I don't go over posts with you? Really? You're reaction right there was what I said would be the case, and I was right. It will be that way for any other post because you can't get over your programming. What am I to do at this point with someone like you? Well I have a few ideas, but I can't type the letters for risk of being banned. I hope you get me. \n\n > so then how do you know what the comments say? \n\nI was in those subs every night for quite a while, so I know very well the the kind of hate that spews from there. Now, I can't go back there again. \n\n > You've literally never seen me in your life. \n\nI've never seen <PERSON> in my life, but I know what to do if I ever saw him. 🌵\n\n > You are the one who is attributing things to me that I'm not writing. \n\nI'll break it down for your two-year old level intellect. You have evil ideas, other people share these evil ideas..and I'm not going to repeat myself just cause your smooth brain can't retain information. \n\n > but I really don't think it's attributable to me \n\nRenounce you're ideology and it won't be. Keep it, and it's aaaall attributable to you and every other green and red square like you. \n\n > I'm not making you type responses. \n\nNope, you're just supporting ideas that fuck me and my family over. Thank you very much. \n\n > I'm not what's preventing you from doing literally anything else. \n\nI want a superstraight sub on reddit. But you support the ideas that are held by others that pushed the button to get one banned. So you are essentially preventing me and many others.\n\n > Do you know who is responsible for that? \n\nYou.", "247" ], [ "> It was filled with transphobia\n\nIt was not. \n\n > it broke Reddit's Terms of Service and it deserved to get banned \n\nWhich it did not, and if it did, it was selectively enforced because the same kind of rhetoric is spewed from other subs (namely subs you like) without consequence, which then makes the reddit ToS unjust. But then, there should be no ToS that specifies what you are allowed to say. I know the idea is anathema to tiny dictators like you, but you should try looking of \"free speech\", it might burn you eyes to look and the words, but keep at it and you'll get used to it.\n\n > The idea that SuperStraight was filled with victims of transgender oppression is completely backwards. \n\nCompletely TRUE dipshit. I showed you in another post the hate and vitriol received by gays and straights for wanting to have a freaking preference on who they fucked. By supporting the silencing of their voice, you are saying they don't have control over that aspect of their lives. They WILL be told who to like and who to love. The feudal lords of old would be so proud. \n\n > They didn't want to commiserate about their shared suffering -- they wanted to inflict suffering and derision on other people \n\nThey were commiserating, you are just are incapable of seeing it as such. So you use the big hammer of \"transphobia\" to control the environment to have your way. But imagine for a moment you are right (you're not), just for a moment and the rhetoric was about wanting to inflict harm. I say the rhetoric on places like r/IncelTear is the same and they don't want to commiserate about their shared suffering -- they want to inflict suffering and derision on other people. You should then want to ban them too and other subs. But you won't, because you're a tribal hypocrite who only cares about their side, but you are lying to yourself that you are anything but. I am not. I am tribal, but I know for the safety and security of not my tribe, but so many others, yours needs to get fucked and fast. \n\n > Particularly people from a marginalized minority group. \n\nThat marginalized minority group had the influence and power to get them banned off of reddit and GoFundMe to yank their charity page off the web. They got tons of enablization from fucks like you. Sounds to me like there was a serious power dynamic at play against the superstraights. By your side's rules, those in a position of power can never be victims, so the superstraights have to be the victims as they had no power to stop what was done to them. But yeah, somehow you'll rationalize how those rules didn't because you didn't like what those superstraights were saying and you know, you = big. dipshit. hypocrite\n\n > And I'm glad they can't do that any more.\n\n You're glee is a sign of your black heart and oppressive mind. One day, we will ban you and every sub you care about so your sickness can't hurt anyone else.", "126" ], [ "> You're fantasizing about hurting me because you aren't getting the satisfaction you want from your comments.\n\nReally? I find all my comments amusing. \n\n > so you imagine a rape scenario where you do have control. \n\nI could imagine other scenarios for you, but then I'd be banned from reddit. \n\n > But that's not what's actually happening. Is it? \n\nIt could though. Would you like to do the just thing and doxx yourself? It's only fair after how your side doxxed so many others and ruined their lives. I will then place the information in all the rightwing subs and beyond, I'm sure we can get some wonderful people to visit. Such an act would exemplify you from all the evil you've supported for sure, a fine repartition. Or do you no longer believe in punishment of collective sin?", "247" ], [ "> Right, it's not their sexuality at all.\n\nIt was and you are being extremely homophobic and straightphobic to say it was not. \n\n > It's something they made up so that they could talk about how much they didn't like transgender people \n\nGay was something just made up so that they could talk about how much hate women. Lesbian was something just made up so that they could talk about how much hate men. Asexual was something just made up so that they could talk about how much they hate people who have sex.\n\nSee? I can be phobic bastard and assume things about other's sexuality too. I don't believe any of those words, I do believe gays, lesbians, and asexuals. That you can't add claims of the \"supers\" into your heart shows phobic nature that deserves all the ridicule it can. \n\n > Those were the only experiences they wanted to share -- positive experiences with people they were attracted to were not something that was at issue. \n\nWhen people want to talk about cars, they go to a place for cars. When gays, lesbians, or straights want to talk about people they are attracted to, they go to other places. When they are viciously attacked by trans types as being transphobic for not wanting to sleep with them, they will want to go to a place for that. But \"NOPE!\", said the great and powerful <PERSON>, \"I don't like them talking about that. I think it's mean to other people even though similar things are said by others (but I like those people, so I'm going to leave them alone). I don't care if they disagree, I support banning them\". Thank you for your swift and terrible judgement, every single one of us REALLY wanted you to support interference in our free will to speak /s\n\n > Uhh, those \"ideas\" are in the Terms of Service. If you don't like the ToS, go to another website. \n\nIf we were living in the 50s, and you said you didn't like Jim Crow laws, and then someone said \"well it's the law. If you don't like it, move somewhere else\", you'd be right to slap that person in the face. Those ToS are unjust to have rules on censoring most of what they do. Even if they were justified, they are being wielded selectively like a weapon against some and not others. We who are affected know very well the proportion of of which side the hammer falls. And wonder why rightwing subs talk about cancel culture and censorship a lot. \n\n > What about the rest of us who like (or tolerate) what we signed up for? \n\nThen you are akin to one who likes (or tolerates) Jim Crow laws aka unjust laws. But like a racist white from the south, of course you love laws that benefit you and yours and oppress others. Don't you? \n\n > the things we want don't matter, because you don't like us. Did I predict that correctly? \n\nClose. The things you want don't matter, because want you want is evil. I don't need to hate you to want to stop you, but I do. But then, hating oppressors comes naturally to most.", "418" ], [ "> Except you can't see those subs.\n\nBut I did, for a long time, and a while ago. So I do know what kind of hate is spewed from there. \n\n > So go to 4chan. \n\nBut the battle against unjust ToS is here, you don't go where the battle is for the most part is won! Furthermore, the left and you are here, and wherever those are, some cactus TLC must be delivered forthwith!\n\n > It wasn't a post on Reddit. \n\n\"there were no holes to see inside the gas chambers\" (A famous holocausts denial trope if you are that uneducated to know). Really digging the bottom of the barrel to disregard those people's pain are we? You know I mean \"link\" fucktard. \n\n > Alright. Let's try it. You're being transphobic. \n\nSoooo cuuuute! \n\n > Are you gonna change your behavior? Or does that \"big hammer\" not work the way you say it does? \n\nIt seemed to work just fine on the reddit staff who banned that subreddit. It worked just fine on the people at GoFundMe who yanked a charity for rape victims (proud work there by the way. Very proud work) \n\n > Turns out your tribal affiliation and the truth happened to be perfectly aligned. \n\nAs they are with you my little green square; as they are with you. But there was a I time that even though I was always against yours, I wanted peace between the tribes. But yours escalated things by saying only your tribe should exist, now yours has to go for the good of all the tribes. Sorry (not sorry). \n\n > Those are the old rules. New rules are intersectional. \n\nThey are almost the same, but even based on intersectionality, the power dynamic favored trans. But I really don't care, because those rules are sexist, racist, ageist, and all-around FUCKING. EVIL. I really look forward to doing a digital book burning of every book that teaches it. I am so glad your side taught me about digital book burning; I will be sure to copy your method to the letter! \n\n > No, you won't. You're imagining that because you find reality uncomfortable. \n > \n > But it's reality just the same.\n\nRemember, I'm am out here. I'm in your reality too. And as I go to work, shop at the store, walk through the park, I lie to everyone and say I am like you. But really, I am always aware for your type, and I am always looking for things, actions, or ideas. And I'm not alone, we are growing because of what's been done to us. What your side has done. If you renounce your side, even to become an apolitical centrist, that would be the end of it. But continue to support ideas that hurt us because we don't want to be you, and I do see a forecast for thunderstorms in the future.", "728" ], [ "> We could just go to the gay subreddit and read what they talk about. What percentage of the time do you think they talk negatively about women?\n\nWhat percentage do they talk negatively about trans? Is that low too? So that must mean gays can't be transphobic. Any gays who were participating in r/superstraights were wrongfully accused! And if that's the logic were using, then straights and lesbians can't be transphobic either because there are places on the web where they talk about their attractions with probably little mention of trans. And there is no proof that the three weren't participating in r/superstraights, and all these other places. I mean, this logic is groundbreaking isn't it /s\n\nOr, their \"negative talk\" was a commiseration that you failed to acknowledge as such because: programming. And even if you disagree, you still will go on to support the existence of subs like r/inceltear because even though they are obviously spewing hate (which I was there to see for a long time), it's hate you like, which in your brain must be translating as \"commiseration\" in their case.\n\n > There's no shortage of places to talk about that. We're talking about it right here, right now.\n\nOh, did a trans tell you you were transphobic for not wanting to sleep with them? Have I talked about an experience like that? No? Then way to go on the fucking false equivalency. There was a place to talk about that, it was r/superstraights, but apparently, you support people to shut the fuck up about such an experience or share the experiences of others who have. Just lovely.\n\n > There's a bit of a difference between moving your house and just.... typing a different URL into your web browser.\n\nWhat is a death by a thousand cuts vs a death by complete obliteration? Just a matter of time and scale. The morality of doing either to a person is the same.\n\n > Except that everyone agreed to the laws when they signed up.\n\n\"everyone agreed blacks were subhuman when they moved to Alabama. You accepted the laws when you moved here\" -Agilofing\n\n > If you didn't like the law, don't make an account and go use a different website. There are plenty\n\nYou would love that wouldn't you, but in case you haven't noticed, I'm a rebel and will not submit to your oppression. I am specifically on reddit to target injustice and fight leftist oppression. Nothing else. I would be on Twitter, on Facebook, on Instagram and all the places the ToS are against me, and the people are too. I found you here, so here I am. Move in mass with your side to another platform, and I will follow.\n\n > predictable, predictable, predicable\n\nYou really can carry only so many words in your head at a time can you. \"The word of the day is \"prediction!\".....any other words? No more room you say? Okay.\n\nI know full well what you and yours think of yourselves. Of course you don't think you're evil, of course you are good people, etc. etc. And all the same thoughts are reversed when thinking towards me. No one ever thought of themselves evil at any point, including the nazis. But that doesn't matter does it, ideas do, actions do, and actions enabled by those ideas do. You're tribe, of which your affiliation and ideas are one in the same (just like me), declared war on several others and declared itself the one and only tribe that should be around. I am the product of the reaction by my tribe, so essentially, you created me. Tell me, how well did you predict your side's actions would have that consequence? You should have foreseen it, and yet here you are, seemingly surprised that I exist, and that I don't just \"go to 4chan\", or \"why don't you just accept the ToS?\". Well what's that saying, \"you reap what you sow\"? Always a classic.", "847" ], [ "> So much for the argument that you're oppressed, disadvantaged minorities looking for a safe space. \n\nI'm looking for the places where we are oppressed, and then stand there, and rebel against the oppressors. If something akin to superstraights was set up on another place and allowed to be, there is no reason for me to go there. But it happened here, and so this is where I need to be. Where the oppression is happening and confront the enablers (aka you). \n\n > You're specifically looking for people to bother. \n\nLeftists, actually make a living doing this! And even those who don't are all to eager to volunteer via places like r/AgainstHateSubreddits. What? You don't like it when I look for people to bother? THEN STOP FUCKING SUPPORTING IT AGAINST ME AND MY SIDE!\n\n > They read a post on a New Zealand website, didn't want to go to 4chan because there's no leftists there, and so came here to violate the ToS. And you're still calling that \"pain\"? \n\nYes, and it is homophobic and straightphobic of you not to recognize such pain. And they can go wherever the fuck they want now to commiserate about it. \n\n > Right, so you didn't change your behavior. So that proves my point about accusations of transphobia being \"the big hammer.\"\n\nIs this feigning of stupidity temporary, or a full-time job...got to be full-time \n\nYou keep on ignoring the power and influence that allowed for r/superstraight to be banned and the GoFundMe page to be yanked. If I could do that to anything of yours, I would do it in a heart beat. Tell me, why can't I? Could it be I have little influence here? If so, then who has the most? Hmmmm, could it be the people who didn't like r/superstraight and charity support for rape victims?\n\n > Libertarian leftists are famous for wanting to get rid of those who oppose them. \n\nThey are now. \n\n > Not like right wingers ever banned anyone before \n\nLess than leftists, but I'm working on the slackers as best I can. Give me some more time and we'll catch up, I promise no more slacking on the banning! :D\n\n > More fantasy.\n\nDr <PERSON> is no fantasy, w*hen <PERSON> Became Sally* is no fantasy, Amazon's decision to vague policy to pull books that encourage hate speech is no. fucking. fantasy. \n\nAny idea of what to do to you all, I have a general rule that I first need to see it on the left. So again, thanks for giving me the brilliant ideas!\n\n > I think I'm pretty secure in my political beliefs. \n\nLol, anonymity is wonderful isn't it. I'd love to know if that sentiment remained if it was every broken\n\n > pro tip, if you are trying to intimidate someone else, maybe don't open with how oppressed you are and how everyone hates you. That kinda undercuts your \"we are growing because of what's been done to us\" \n\nThanks, I'll log that away in my wonderful bag of useless information I will never use. \n\nThe tactic you describe may be *the* best way to grow a populist movement. BLM did it with enormous success, so sounds like a great tactic. \n\n > Transphobes are weaker than ever. Do you not agree? \n\nIf by \"transphobes\", you mean people who disagree with you. Then nope, I think we are getting much stronger. Three years ago, I would not have been here saying these things, but here I am! Keep trying to ban those superstraight subs, \" The more you tighten your grip, the more that will slip through your fingers\"", "728" ], [ "> Or it means that particular subreddits don't allow transphobia?\n\nI would never trust you, nor anyone like you to ever know what that is again after this.\n\n > if only Reddit's rules addressed this specifically. Something like...\n\nOr, the ToS are bullshit and unjust and need to be change to allow the free speech of individuals. \n\n > did you even look at the image that started this entire thread? \n\nFocus. Did a trans tell you you were transphobic for not wanting to sleep with them? Have I talked about an experience like that? \n\n > Except no one is dying. Your subreddit got banned. Pretty sure <PERSON> was a bit more than just banning hateful subreddits. \n\nAnnnd the analogy is lost, way to go on missing the point dumbass. \n\n > You're specifically trying to go to left wing spaces and bother them. \n\nYeppers! I am practicing the methods and techniques of the great masters of the art: the left. Every method I know, I am trying to copy from what I see of them. I do not do anything in my plan of attacks unless I first know it was done by them.\n\n > But you don't seem to want to actually show off that superpower. \n\nWhen I showed you the shame receipts on the NZ websites, your reaction of dismissal was so predictable I laughed my ass off. I got to read that again for giggle.\n\n Where such predictions actually matter though, I'd never reveal anything, as one of my leftist co-workers found out about a little too late. Trusting in his behavior, and manipulating the belief that I was one of his, getting him fired was fairly easy that time. I eagerly await such an opportunity again. \n\n & #x200B;\n\nNow it's been fun using you as my little punching bag, but there are others who also need the love, so I'm going to head on out to find them. I'm not even going to read what you have to say on the other posts. \n\nI'll just leave this last thought for you. You live in a bubble of extreme density. You don't seem to be aware of your side, their actions, or what they are doing. If you were remotely on mine, even just a little, you'd see all the legal persecution we are having to endure and feel the hatred we get for just existing, and worst of all, it's barely about being rightwing anymore. There is rage and anger from your side over not so much people wanting to become rightwing, but who just don't want to be you! I have seen the stories of the centrists and the apolitical who were targeted by your group when they DIDN'T express opinions; they had to, and they had to be of the left's. I get to talk to these people online all the time. They are the number one new influx of new people that I see, and I am in several spheres to get to see them. \n\nSo continue to be unaware, continue to believe in the lies of goodness and acceptance your tribe tells you, and always dismiss the hurt and pain expressed by those not of your side. The NZ posts I got was not a random search, but circulated among the people at r/superstraight. And I remember them saying \"yes, this has been my experience, but no one believes me\". It's seriously the best recruiting tool that we, and especially, *I* have ever had. A large portion of the right is not on my side yet, but with this, I'm making new friends all the time. \n\nPerhaps one day, we'll reach a critical mass and the pendulum will swing not in your favor. Then we will start the banning, rewrite the ToS, and apply any of these rules only to you while never harming our own. And then, maybe at that point, you'll finally understand where I was coming from. \n\n & #x200B;\n\nAnd also.....cactus rape 🌵🌵🌵. May it forever lodge itself as a permanent fixture to your smooth brain. See a cactus, and remember me fondly :D", "847" ], [ "Nope, <PERSON> is correct and it was because he was upset the temple was being used as a place for business. Biblical scholars understand that that activity should not have been taking place in the temple anyway, and generally agree that he was just looking to get the rules enforced. Also of interest is why he isn't reported doing it again anywhere else in the gospels. He should have been throwing over the tables left and right in every town market place if your theory was correct, but that surely would have been reported.", "754" ], [ "I absolutely agree we need to go back to an earlier time like the early 2000s, but how can we do that when so many are against free speech and are growing their numbers. Part of how they do this is they will censor dissent wherever it appears. They have no compuction, or morality that says they can't do it, so while we try to argue with the facts, they don't, they just make sure no one can hear them. It's like fighting with two hands tied behind the back.\n\nWell I say we even the playing field. We support free speech, but not that of those who advocate against it. So yes, we let the guy use his free speech; no, we do not let him use it to destroy free speech. I hope I am making that clear.", "865" ], [ "I'm a libertarian type, and I have a framework that says war should not only be accepted by libertarians, but actively engaged in. \n\n**Argument one.** Libertarians say they respect the liberty of individuals, and will support that liberty to be defended whether by police, a military, or a militia. But that only applies to people within our national borders. When we look at people on the other side of the border, their liberty doesn't matter to us if a warlord, dictator, or socialist party tyrannize them. The solution told to me is that it is their problem and theirs alone to deal with, we need to only look to our own. \n\nThat logic has never sat well with me. I was told that the individual liberty of ALL humans was important, why should it be less important just because some humans are on the other side of an arbitrary border? The concept of a border is already weak to most libertarians. We support the free movement of people and if they come into our nation, we will protect their liberty more; when they move out, we could care about it less. It's like as if, not all liberty is equally valued -- that all *humans* are not equally valued. \n\nI for one value the liberty of all humans, whether they are in my nation or outside of it. If others are becoming oppressed by others, their concern is mine, and I think it should be that opinion for all libertarians. Thus, the defensive war concept should be expanded beyond our borders to encompass the whole world. \n\n**Argument two.** Even if we think we should not interfere in other nations, that does not mean others won't abide by the same standard. One of the greatest threats to liberty in the 20th century was the Soviet Union, and some forget that they didn't just believe in their oppressive communism, but they also believed they had a mandate commanded of them to spread it to every corner of the globe aggressively. \n\nThey sent military troops to squelch freedom movements in their own soviet states, and they sent troops and support for the communists of Ethiopia during the Somalia-Ethiopia war, and they plainly tried to conqueror the sovereign nation of Afghanistan. And they were not the only one's to do it. Cuba also sent troops to prop up the communists in Ethiopia, China sponsored the terrorist rampage of <PERSON> and support for North Vietnam, and I don't need to explain how odd it was to see advanced MIG Jet fighters taking off from relatively low tech North Korean airbases during the Korean war.\n\nRemember, they were not being hypocrites about anything, they were following their mandate to make the whole world communist -- to take away all liberty and self-determination from all people. Such a belief like that is anathema to everything libertarians believe in, and yet the belief we need to be anti-war means that if libertarians had been in charge during the cold war, the communists would have just kept on going, toppling the nations like dominos, becoming stronger as they take their resources and gaining momentum. \n\nI argue that it was right to fight them in every avenue where we did, in every theater. This argument isn't about protecting the liberty of people so much as it is stopping the anti-liberty aggression of oppressors. So I say it was right then, and it is right now that we actively engage these anti-liberty forces whether they mobilize here at home or abroad. Freedom is incompatible with oppression, and the communists knew this, so it is that we need take that to heart and take the initiate against oppressive forces to preserve freedom for all.", "627" ], [ "> What's the difference in libertarianism and anarchy?\n\nLibertarians are not anarchist that all do believe in a small amount of government for specific purposes. There is debate on those purposes, but there is high consensus at least that says those purposes need to be for the defense of people and their property, the enforcement of contracts, and maintaining a justice system with courts and jails. For those that we don't agree on, we at least agree on the guideline \"as much government as necessary, as little government as possible\". I for example do think that administering environmental protections would be in the purview of a libertarian government. Several disagree, but I'm interested in building a consensus on it. \n\nThere are those that disagree to the idea of a government at all and those are right anarachists aka anarcho-capitalists. They have a sub elsewhere", "627" ], [ "This actually surprises me little. I know how bad these people want their utopia. To strive for it is to reach for the face of god. So because of such focused zealousness, there is never too high a price to pay, no hypocrisy too hard to tolerate, no alternative idea too dangerous, and no life too valuable to be kept spared.\n\nTo quote one of the commenters from that post, \"To badly paraphrase <PERSON>, you can't have a revolution with white gloves, but you can have one with a clean conscience because you *know*, as a revolutionary that the work you're doing, while it may be unpleasant, inconvenient, and might not even totally align with our values, is so incredibly essential that we cannot *not* do the work. \"", "142" ], [ "Communism seeks to be an all encompassing idea that permeates everything. It is like a toxic gas that fills every gap and chokes any other life it finds. There can be no alternative idea in the minds of people, it WILL have a monopoly on all thought for any idea that is not it's own is a threat.\n\nIn contrast, philosophies like libertarianism and capitalism are not so much about being the sole idea in the land as they are very much about being a vacuum for all ideas. Anyone is allowed to think and place their ideas forth in the marketplace of ideas without worry or fear of retribution, and the activity creates a diversity of thought as wonderful as a full market with a diversity of goods for everyone's unique taste. But this will cease to be if we do not work to secure the market against the monopolistic force that is communism.", "534" ], [ "Oh, I hate it when that happens even among friends and family! The most I've personally gone without texting someone is one day, so it is worrisome to say the least if it's been over three days. I wonder if he's physically okay. If I were to send a text further, my inquiry would be about that. It would be close to, \"It's been a few days and I'm feeling a little worried if you are alright. I'm worried something might have happened. I really would appreciate you texting me back at least to let me know you are alright\".", "432" ], [ "51% of women were asked if they would date a man based on one criteria in a scientific setting with a simple yes or no answer. We are all more than a single criteria and the depth of an actual relationship changes things immensely.\n\nIf you could somehow have those women think of the men as someone they had common interests with, was really great to them, and as someone they really liked, then when the question would come up on if they cared if they were a virgin, the answer of \"yes\" would be significantly lower.", "209" ], [ "The narrative now seems to be that because Asians are seen to be a more successful demographic in society, they must not be experiencing racism. There's even jokes about Asians being \"honorary whites\". This is all bullshit of course. You experience racism, whites experience racism, but society is now acting like the only people who ever can experience racism are blacks.", "987" ], [ "If you're reaction is NOT like authrights quadrant, you are really disconnected from reality. I liked the idea of women going in the military if the standards were the same, and I was told that was the case. But if they are even thinking about lowering the standards, then this is a huge problem.\n\nThe military has a job, an incredibly important job, and the ability to do it is all that matters. Do NOT lower the standards for ANYONE who asks for it, man or women.", "798" ], [ "It originally meant someone in the libleft quadrant who defined their politics completely on their hatred of <PERSON>, hence the name \"orange\" libleft, but the term has begun to encompass those those loud, race obsessed leftists referred to as \"the woke\". \n\nIt is popular to assume that this is a subsection of libleft, and does not represent the views of the majority of the quadrant, but based on the I see playing out in the world right now, I'd say they are the dominant force on the entire left, not just libleft.", "965" ], [ "I've tended to hear something about terrorists blasting home made bombs in northern Ireland and killing innocents, but I am going to say I don't know enough about those events to comment.\n\nWhat I do know is even if she can be hated for her involvement there, she was a true rightist that deregulated the economy, took on the corrupt unions, privatized state owned assets, and pissed off the leftists to no end. That definitely counts for something.", "690" ], [ "I don't know where you are getting any of this. Right-to-work does not disallow a union to exist or to bargain, it simply means people do not have to be forced to join a union as a condition of their employment, but they can if they want to. If they choose not to, then the lack of members could weaken the union. If the members think the union is valuable though, they will join up voluntarily to ensure it remains operational, just like any other free market organization.", "334" ], [ "I think you were right when this trend started. The networks you mention specifically I believe found there was more money to be made catering to a specific political demographic. But then later on, as they got more partisan people to provide more partisan news for this purpose, those people ensured their ideologies really did permeate in every office corridor, and they ensured only their own would be hired. Now, I really believe that they believe in what they are saying and money is a secondary concern.", "840" ], [ "> it sounds like you restricted yourself to only dating partners you considered marriable in the first place\n\nAnd that's exactly right. I don't think we were dating the same way then.\n\n > It sounds like you're in a more comfortable place in your dating life right now \n\nDating still has plenty of issues, but In comparison to how things were, absolutely.\n\n > so keep it up, and best of luck to you \n\nThank you.", "1003" ], [ "> both North and South Vietnam were one country\n\nUnder a former emperor, not a communist government. Then it was the Viet Minh who took over the North and the country relinquished control of it to them deciding to focus it's control over just the South. So it sounds to me like the communist north didn't want to be one country first, so by your logic, it would have been right if the South Vietnamese had marched in and forced them back in the fold. \n\n > Countries can be easily bribed or coerced to give out recognition\n\nNo communist state recognized South Vietnam and all recognized the North. I wonder if coercion from Moscow and Beijing had anything to do with that.\n\n > Do you know how South Vietnam could suddenly pop out of nowhere \n\nThe same way North Vietnam just popped out of nowhere, recognition.", "839" ], [ "> What year are you referring to? \n\n1949 to 1955 under <PERSON>\n\n > And why do you call the liberation of the North from France's colonial occupation a \"takeover\"? \n\nI said no such thing. The French relinquished control not to <PERSON> DRV, but to <PERSON> to start a provisional government, and then to <PERSON> for the years I mentioned as a full \"[State of Vietnam](_URL_0_)\". The DRV then decided to takeover the northern part of the country, not from the French, but from the State of Vietnam. They then proceeded to lay claim to the whole of the country being under their rule.", "120" ], [ "> hat right did the French, colonial aggressors and invaders, have to \"relinquished control\" to anyone\n\nEveryone recognized their claim to the region as their colony, so they recognized the claim of the State of Vietnam when they gave it to them. \n\n > without a permission from <PERSON>, the president of Vietnam \n\nHe was a self declared president of nothing. He did not have the country and no one then recognized his claim until the Soviet Union and China did*.*\n\nYou seem care about the legalities of the situation accept when the result does not mean the communists control all of Vietnam, then it's \"it wasn't right for the French to even be there!\". I'm starting to think you're a authleft posing as a centrist.", "120" ], [ "> And somehow those \"everyone\" had more right to select Vietnam's government than the native Vietnamese? \n\nSomehow you think are substituting \"<PERSON>\" with \"native Vietnamese\". Both are not what I actually support, but given the consensus of the international community vs the tyranny of one man over a people, I'm going on the opinion of the international consensus. Seeing what you support, you should change your flair over to a red square right now. \n\n > Basically, your argument is...\n\nThe French had the recognized claim to the colony, so they could give it to whoever they wanted, and who they gave it to was recognized by 88 countries. If you want to say they never had that right to begin with, well then I say neither did the communists who simply asserted their right through military might. No democratic action would ever be legitimate for them.\n\nNow turn in your centrist square you poser.", "839" ], [ "> the international community, who were basically fat white men sitting on the other half of the planet, recognizing the enslavement of an entire population. \n\nIs that what you call democracy when it doesn't agree with you? Because that's essentially what \"international consensus\" means, it's democracy on a global scale. Unless you are saying \n\n > And since you're the one advocating for internationalism and globalism, for native people to be subjugated and persecuted by the \"international community\", why don't you change your flair? \n\nI've only been explaining the legalism that precipitated events during that time, I don't believe I have specifically advocated for any of it, because I don't. What I really support is the French didn't have a claim to do anything there, but neither did <PERSON>. It doesn't matter if he had 80% supported him (which considering communists' reputation with democratic processes, I don't believe for a nanosecond was true), no one would have had the right to oppress the other 20% in what was just as brutal a regime as <PERSON>'s. I too could care less about what was legal and only about what was right, and no communist regime anywhere is ever right to rule a country, under no circumstances. If you're going to disagree, it just confirms more your faux centrism.", "870" ], [ "> The legalism back then was very simple.\n\nIndeed it was. It was a colony of France who gave it to a former emperor of the region as the State of Vietnam. Any claims by <PERSON> and his faux \"democratic\" government were what were illegal..\n\nBut as I said, I don't care about any of this. France shouldn't have been involved, and neither should have any communists. \n\n > you oppose the heroes who saved the country and liberated the people \n\nI oppose the \"villainous bastards\" (FTFY) who enslaved their people in a \"communal oppression\" (also FTFY) they would never escape. \n\n > you support the traitors who worked for international invaders.\n\nNow you are making stuff up. I never supported the French in Indo-China. \n\n > Had the French won, all Vietnamese nowadays would have continued to live in cages with chains on their necks and work to death in coalmines and plantations \n\nAnd unfortunetly, something worse happened, <PERSON> won, and forced labor camps and political genocide occurred to a degree that made the French look like benevolent angels in comparison . But I expect nothing less for a brainwashed authleft to have the opinion that it was happy happy all day long under big pappa <PERSON>.\n\n > Basically, for you, what was right was for half of the humankind to stay enslaved and subjugated? \n\nNo, that is what you support by being a good little authleft and supporting communist dictatorships, they are the ultimate slavers and subjugators, and you are one by proxy for support them. Only they brainwashed you very well to actually think you are on the side of the liberators (lol).", "839" ], [ "I don't think you understand that when I mean \"repentance\", it was divine repentance to be directed towards god. This could be the mechnism that often saved one's life in front of an angry, self-rightous mob.\n\nCompare to The Bachelor's host <PERSON>) who couldn't seem to apologize enough for pissing off the mob, and will still be canned from the show. We also have country music star <PERSON>) who drunkenly called one of his friends the N word (his friend was white) in jest. He apologized profusely, but he was kicked from his record label, barred from AMC award eligibilty, and had his songs removed from over 400 radio stations and digital streaming services.\n\n[And don't think the woke will not kill.](_URL_3_) <PERSON> was a conservative counter protestor at a BLM rally in Portland and was shot in cold blood by protestors. Rather than coming out on how terrible this was, the protestors [gathered around to praise his death.](_URL_2_)\n\nI'm thinking there is something far worse about today's left. And even if there is disagreement, the old puritans are gone; the new puritans are here, and the levels they will go to further their cause just keeps extending.", "754" ], [ "> Very few in Authleft unironically look up to <PERSON> and <PERSON> and see them as models.\n\nMaybe you don't go to places like r/sino or r/genzedong much. \n\nAnd let's be clear, if it's a contest between anyone on the left and a whore, I will take the side of the whore, or the side of a fat obnoxious kid with bad teeth, or a conspiracy nut who believes aliens are trying to steal our chickens, or the gay cross-dresser who loves yiffy yaoi shit, or ANYONE over someone on the left.", "336" ], [ "99%?! Not even I'm that pessimistic as to the state of the planet! Besides, if you really want to know, I just want to go after the commies in power. The ones who aren't may continue to suck air...unless they try to go after the power again.\n\n > Heaven, or the <PERSON> character?\n\noooo tough choice! The <PERSON> character *is* pretty bad-ass. \n\nUnfortunately, it's not a choice. We got to be Doom Guy fighting the demons to get our <PERSON>, and then we got to remain the Doom Guy to keep it.", "874" ], [ "> My statistic...\n\nWell then that's not fair. There were many good freedom lovers who voted republican in the last elections. It may not have been ideal, it may not have been everything they wanted, but in a reality where a winner needs 51% of the vote, they couldn't let the \"perfect\" be the enemy of the \"good\". That's no reason to be complacent though, and work should be done to make the \"good\" more \"perfect\". For freedom lovers, that often means working outside of the libertarian party.\n\n > commies in power are like Hydra, cut one head off, and another one grows back.\n\nSeems they were able to accomplish this in Chile. And in the case of Japan, all it took was the offing of [just one commie](_URL_0_) for which the commies never quite recovered from. So it seems pretty possible to me.\n\n > but we can instead live in a, say, 12% Statist Nation (say, Switzerland, one of the least Statist, most Minarchist nations), and then push toward a 100% Free Country\n\nI'd do my idea, but that's a great idea too. We could do both!", "519" ], [ "> What am I saying is that Stalinists and Maoists are authleft\n\nGlad you can admit this.\n\n > but they represent a very tiny part of all people that are authleft \n\nSo it's not that you want to kill a millions, just a few hundred thousand here or there? Well I honestly don't care, every authleft has in them a variation of some atrocity waiting to be free. Whatever opinions you have about yourself and your reasoning for being authleft is wrong. You are humanity's villain for being what you are, and until you give up your beliefs, that's never going to change.", "870" ], [ "> I believe true evil starts when you stop even considering the other person as a human being and see them at fundamentally vilanous because of one of their perceived belief. \n\nTo stop considering one a human and see them fundamentally villainess because of a belief is inherent to what it means to be authleft. So, if I am doing that, it's because your side did it first. You do not deserve the respect of humanity for carrying your beliefs, and so for that reason, I can't possibly want to kill millions of people, because you're not people.", "219" ], [ "If someone specifically says they are against free speech, then we don't need to support them. They could have whatever other idea they want to promote, but the moment they say \"and we need to shut down free speech\", that is when we should bring the hammer down on them.\n\nOne can say that killing is wrong, but when others are trying to kill, you are then morally vindicated if you pick up a weapon to stop the killers. You are not being \"just like them\" when your goal in stopping the killers is to prevent the killing.", "865" ], [ "If you have consistent data, the answer can still not be \"bias\". That that is the conclusion every fucking time to any discrepancy in race is why people more and more just stop listening when someone cries \"racism\". And these studies are not often looking for an answer, they are looking for THE answer -- the one that confirms an already believed hypothesis of racial bias. Funding will hardly be granted for any study that is not trying to prove this. Any variables that does not get the answer they want are thrown out or or ignored; I already know how that plays out for one of these. The reason black people get harsher criminal sentences for the same crime is because there is a higher amount of repeat crime for individuals there. You commit the crime, you get a sentence; you do it again, the penalty is harsher. If that one variable can explain that, what other variables are you not considering that could easily explain the others? How many ARE known that are being purposely withheld or suppressed because it goes against the a predetermined political narrative of racial bias?\n\nAnd even if it turns out there was legitimate bias in cases, this does not mean that the answer to fix it is more fucking racism! Affirmative action, quotas, reparations, elimination of due process, double standards based on race, are all racist as fuck, and fuck any racist bastard that believes any of these is a grand idea.", "205" ], [ "> They dont exist man.\n\nIf they did, they would never be shown and never be discussed. You would never know about them. Did you know about the variable for longer sentences for past offenders? If not, why not? What else is being kept from you that lead to a different conclusion on any data set?\n\nAnd as for policy, if fixing any discrepancy in race requires discrimination based on race, then fuck that. It's really that simple.", "205" ], [ "> But if litteraly all the good studies you can find say the same thing its pretty conclusive.\n\nAnd I seriously doubt that they are good studies, any of them. Academia is drowning in the Idpol, critical race theory dogma and no one is going to get in who doesn't sing the same song. By the same token, no study is going to be submitted or provided that doesn't help prove it. If someone dares to do so, they will be marked and promptly cancelled.\n\n > Also it obviously isn’t that simple \n\nNo, It really is.", "859" ], [ "> Let me know why there wrong.\n\nI told you, the academia establishment won't allow them to be wrong. They are dominated by you and yours and the narrative of systemic racism has been set. Anything that gets in the way of that will be done away with, anyone who tries to challenge that will become a marked man. There is no room for debate in that kind of environment. You might as well have had better luck trying to publish a study explaining the benefits of capitalism from a Soviet university than to study non-racially based variables that explain racial discrepancy.\n\n > Also your philosophical reasoning has the nuance of a 15 year old lol.\n\nI think a 15 year old has a better understanding of grasping this concept than you. Let's bring it down to a lower level and maybe you'll get it: racism. is. bad. Your marathon level attempt to rationalize how it is justified is astounding.", "859" ], [ "> We don't have to uphold anyone's speech\n\nRead what I said, I am not saying we should uphold anyone's speech. Nor am I saying we need blanket censorship of ideas. I am talking about silencing one thing and one thing only, and that is calls to attack free speech. \n\n > OP wants to fight so-called censorship by using moderation-based Reddit. \n\nExactly, and with every other tool at our disposal in all arenas, online and off. This is the tactic we are forced to adopt. We are at the point that free speech is under attack in every area of life, and the censors are not shy in using the tools they have to shut us down. If we act like pacifists on a battlefield, we will be obliterated from existence, and our precious idea of free speech with it. We have to fight if we want to see any chance of a future for our ideas, and I say that means censoring those who would want to censor us.", "126" ], [ "Well we got to work on that don't we. And not just here, but everywhere. We need to fight in every arena, public and private, offline and off, in social media and face to face. The position of the free speech movement up till now has been like that of a bunch of pacifists afraid to hurt anyone. We don't fight the censors because we are afraid to interfere with their speech. Well I say enough of that; it's time to pick up a weapon and fight.", "865" ], [ "> I do question the validity of my science\n\nIf that was true, you'd question if the results found in your studies could be the result of anything other than racism, but you didn't. I already told you how one of them could be invalid, is that going to make you stop and wonder about the rest? \n\n > I would love to have you look over my sources and talk about them \n\nYou expect me to take seriously any study or finding you have regarding race knowing the environment from which they sprung? You cannot honestly be serious. Anyone with half a brain who is not you and yours knows that your leftist tribe is obsessed with race; you practically worship the concept. It is the thought that paralyzes critical thinking, just like god to the puritans, or communism to the Soviets. If the KKK released a study claiming they have proof that blacks are subhuman, would even give it two seconds of thought? No you wouldn't, and you'd be right not to. \n\nSo it is with you. I will not waste any brain cells on any claim from your side. You've proven not with facts, but with actions over the years just how zealous to your new religion you are, how destructive you are in seeing it implemented, and how hostile you are to any critic that dare confront you with an opposing idea. People have been silenced, doxxed, fired, harassed, vandalized, beaten, and even killed by your fucking side. You are unfit to hold even the slightest amount authority as you emulate the worst human traits when you hold any of it. \n\nGiven all this, you think I need to consider your fucking studies?! No, I'm just going to concern my efforts with the complete dismantling of your entire existence, the healing of the mental harm you've caused, and the erasure of your influence from the face of the earth.\n\nDo you get me? Good. Now go fuck yourself.", "569" ], [ "Everywhere I look on this post, there is near unanimous agreement that you can date or have sex with whoever you like, or don't like, and that your sexuality is your business.\n\nBut the thing that keeps on going around is that this r/superstraight sub was still banned. That really tells me there are people out there who believe that your sexuality is their business, that your desire is there's to direct, that such a personal aspect of your life is not yours at all. And also, they exist in large enough number and with such support that they not only managed to get that sub banned, but also got it's GoFundMe page for a women's rape center taken off!\n\nIs anyone else's heart beating out of their chest in fear?", "418" ] ]
380
[ 22, 887, 5122, 5463, 14707, 5835, 1535, 18349, 22688, 15113, 6259, 18160, 12744, 6704, 8006, 7356, 12913, 12402, 2230, 19760, 4039, 7273, 7451, 14720, 19256, 8207, 14896, 6026, 15555, 19332, 24832, 5037, 7284, 6473, 10236, 23902, 23054, 16569, 1700, 2188, 8077, 8017, 5961, 25021, 7047, 8045, 16249, 479, 19425, 4303, 3677, 9293, 15628, 25471, 2403, 8896, 9110, 13822, 23293, 2545, 8449, 1499, 10022, 1650, 3223, 5210, 8108, 4634, 15098, 12420, 15477, 14179, 6644, 23586, 18374, 21625, 14503, 6305, 18767, 5146, 12417, 18031, 10661, 9323, 5330, 5727, 21400, 14356, 23944, 11496, 11565, 17700, 7677, 21380, 8687, 16565, 18379, 25521, 25307, 21064, 1884, 514, 8863, 999, 8617, 5090, 12872, 13091, 23042, 5142, 6721, 15085, 10495, 10564, 18178, 1337, 22325, 7036, 13321, 15211, 11928, 25463, 6187, 10263, 21220, 25166, 13400, 5735, 5759, 2134, 21060, 14944, 18575, 8973, 13416, 1927, 1633, 21885, 21033, 19807, 9180, 1201, 24046, 21674, 15890, 9745, 3512, 22821, 5901, 24708, 12361, 19730, 19441, 19113, 22217, 14329, 17234, 15635, 10303, 20145, 16152, 25130, 1526, 286, 5947, 7701, 5708, 5162, 24083, 3121, 11441, 10226, 6741, 5190, 1969, 5661, 493, 24769, 9361, 8200, 20330, 5941, 23117, 12877, 23715, 10011, 21811, 12141, 2019, 19429, 13551, 19803, 10376, 15902, 20530, 12222, 23364, 13509, 13581, 17236, 3721, 6314, 20713, 13122, 7764, 5471, 1937, 13184, 23261, 13002, 22243, 16, 16798, 4129, 24474, 11431, 3566, 20146, 4329, 922, 17070, 14744, 16781, 12278, 25124, 24028, 917, 8158, 13613, 2916, 1045, 3831, 25544, 11513, 16960, 10327, 2644, 23685, 23331, 15963, 19789, 9938, 20106, 8235, 2895, 7695, 12382, 9395, 7556, 17759, 6670, 21992, 22156, 2951, 11692, 8157, 22874, 13864, 2145, 8921, 2783, 20039, 14821, 13666, 2736, 14575, 3564, 21433, 6590, 2453, 1301, 17802, 13084, 11197, 17701, 23523, 18175, 24844, 1704, 19900, 2633, 19184, 8558, 1573, 16949, 10907, 6503, 7493, 4933, 23053, 8742, 23914, 12036, 11580, 12359, 21649, 22006, 8304, 17896, 11923, 2907, 18603, 22393, 3931, 5567, 23107, 22014, 3815, 5449, 10389, 19613, 12448, 10537, 923, 14598, 22828, 25207, 24208, 20531, 6277, 20409, 16344, 25508, 8590, 10813, 11059, 14649, 20068, 7111, 22096, 5216, 7712, 3676, 1011, 6427, 7636, 1193, 6642, 24022, 20063, 7738, 22242, 20858, 9665, 270, 20460, 14004, 18230, 4171, 9308, 10, 63, 9501, 12755, 11084, 4872, 2200, 10914, 24185, 24942, 10465, 5544, 19377, 20553, 22567, 19248, 2107, 652, 13126, 13557, 5076, 22740, 7778, 11066, 15481, 3497, 13, 22334, 17805, 10640, 4231, 4839, 13303, 11133, 16277, 10768, 16463, 19223, 18409, 4389, 2144, 17355, 7289, 13749, 21102, 15083, 9830, 9409, 2112, 4280, 8533, 25404, 12597, 3793, 22983, 9373, 333, 4547, 5191, 633, 2223, 13756, 4971, 14519, 10797, 4136, 453, 9891, 3757, 13299, 16936, 2105, 6465, 24184, 2533, 12429, 17095, 24807, 22012, 14000, 19078, 12090, 449, 7824, 11183, 2136, 7810, 9697, 16022, 15563, 8732, 7034, 5689, 18420, 16786, 12887, 24074, 17466, 11758, 18436, 7291, 16244, 22970, 7645, 22648, 10838, 10224, 6861, 3719, 22433, 5993, 21843, 9439, 12034, 11130, 18197, 1084, 9752, 936, 20991, 18248, 20628, 12796, 11984, 10390, 15092, 13092, 5045, 2347, 19410, 2287, 15367, 2782, 3141, 8993, 6846, 12410, 20707, 9059, 24503, 23490, 17656, 5040, 18681, 11422, 23417, 21619, 9539, 7578 ]
reddit_dump_-RadarRanger-
[ [ "> horribly faded paint\n > \n > dent in the hood\n > \n > pieces of the grill missing\n\nYou can't hold that against them. The last one was built almost 30 years ago.\n\nAnd I'll take that velour over leather seats. My wife and son each have cars with the mouse fur interior and that was a selling point for us versus others that came with leather, because leather after a bunch of years cracks and splits, where the fabric interiors just lasts *forever.* My car has leather seats. :-(\n\n > obvious blown rings (Mitsubishi engines only)\n\nDon't forget the teflon timing chain guides on the \"silent shaft\" motors. Those motors were great when new, but the impossibly complicated carburetors, the two-mile-long timing chains, and the self-destructing teflon guides made them all but unserviceable.", "400" ], [ "I was blown away by how car-like they drive, and the size is just perfect, and the versatility of the seating made them just awesome utility vehicles. I took the back one out for awhile to give myself lots of storage room while still maintaining seating for four; then I took the middle seat out so I could move something another time but left the back seat in so when I rode in the back it was like a limousine with all the legroom, LOL! You could put either seat in either location.\n\nThe only thing better is that the new ones have Stow-and-Go, where the seats disappear into the floors--and when they're in the upright position, you've got big ol' smuggler compartments!\n\nOne of ours (the one with the four-cyl, not the Mitsu-6) even had a sunroof!\n\nDamn, I'm getting nostalgic for our old van now...", "93" ], [ "[This](_URL_1_) was my bicycle growing up. There's never been a more 1980's bicycle in all of history, and it was *glorious*. Those body louvers made an eerie howling sound as it cut through the wind. The wheel discs were just seven kinds of *radical*. The tires and pedals were white because it was the 80s. And the [crank sprocket](_URL_0_) had a finish that made it shine like a CD.\n\nThis was a vision of the future as seen through the lens of the 1980s.\n\nYeah, I was a <PERSON> kid.", "788" ], [ "That birthright citizenship and universal suffrage should be eliminated.\n\nJust being born on territory declared as American should in no way be enough to make you a full-on citizen. Your parents' citizenship should play a role in it. Anchor babies are a genuine phenomenon.\n\nLikewise, you ought to have to take a test to prove you're aware of the current issues and the stands that various politicians take on them before being allowed to vote.\n\n**EDIT** Whoa, answer the question calling for a controversial opinion by actually providing one and get downvoted out of existence. Never let it be said Reddit is a place for honest conversation!", "845" ], [ "> earn the same exact credits that transfer over\n\nNot necessarily. This is generally true of State colleges, which have agreements with Community colleges to accept 100% of the credits. Go to a different State, or a private university, or worse try to transfer to any college from a private for-profit school, and they're gonna play the pick-and-choose game.\n\n\"Yes, you took Composition 101 already, but we're only counting that as 20% of the four credits you require for our program. So you have to take it again.\"", "154" ], [ "> Restricting voting rights is a very slippery slope\n\nBut remember that nobody has *truly* universal suffrage. Even the United States excludes a good quarter of the population according to age, birth, criminal record, citizenship... I fail to see how a thirty-year-old moron can vote more wisely than a fifteen-year-old genius.\n\nTo vote is to wield authority. It is in our political system the supreme authority from which all *other* authority derives. To permit irresponsible authority is to sow disaster.", "845" ], [ "Wow, oh, wow. I don't know how those guys kept their cool when those bikes began to wobble. I don't know how they found guys willing to intentionally induce steering wobble at 90 mph! But thank God they did.\n\nTL;DW: Lie down on the tank and the wobble goes away. Get control, get it stopped, and get it towed!", "449" ], [ "Your argument makes no sense. A group creates a country by establishing borders and then defining the laws regarding how politics and commerce will be practiced within that sphere of influence.\n\nScientists create vaccines to fight illnesses and keep people healthy.\n\nThe two concepts are not similar.\n\nYour argument is about as cogent as saying, \"Yeah, well, knives are sharp.\"", "651" ], [ "Long about the time it starts to get nice out, the cops begin staking out high traffic areas to begin writing tickets.\n\nAt least in my area.\n\nIt's revenue generation, pure and simple. I think it makes up for all the time spent sitting in their cars and stations *not* writing tickets during the winter.\n\nA couple years ago they popped my wife for having missed the renewal date on her driver's license. It cost us half a grand. And the rat-faced prosecutor had the nerve to give me a big toothy politician's smile like he was doing us a favor.", "462" ], [ "> The “test to vote” thing sounds like a good idea until you consider that it’s pretty discriminatory against people who don’t have access to even baseline quality public education\n\nReserving the vote exclusively for informed individuals who can ensure the country is on an appropriate course is the very point. Uneducated or undereducated people should not be able to vote.\n\nNow more than ever, access to information is nearly universal. Even the homeless can keep abreast of global events, if they're so inclined.", "845" ], [ "That's all they get from me; if they miss it or it's not enough, fuck 'em.\n\nI wish the wave weren't a thing. Yeah, the community aspect is nice and all, but on days like today when it's the first 70°+ day since September and every third vehicle on the road is a motorcycle, it gets old in a hurry, you know? But you don't wanna be \"that guy\" who's too cool to wave, sooooo... you just have to conform to expectation, I guess. Sure is annoying, though.", "891" ], [ "> So not a significant difference then?\n\nNot a *measurable* or *quantifiable* difference. Two bikes come off the assembly line the same hour. One is ridden conservatively and the other is beaten on. The first is going to go a lot more miles with many fewer problems than the second. You'll go through consumables faster: brake pads, chains, tires. But nobody can say \"Each minute above 5000 RPM equates to 10 miles traveled,\" because nobody knows that. \n\nAll you can do is understand that if the cam chain tensioners fail early, or the engine throws a rod, or the bike starts blowing smoke and burning oil, it's pretty much your fault and that you've brought it on earlier than it needed to happen. Your machine; your choice.", "318" ], [ "You're assuming that in 50 years they'll still be teaching history. The Trump administration wants to [combine the departments of Education and Labor,](_URL_0_) I guess to cement into policy the cynical idea that public education exists solely to prepare tomorrow's laborers for a life of service to their privately-educated betters.\n\nEighth grade reading and math is all you little people need to be taught.", "762" ], [ "Man, there was an early episode, out in the West someplace, where the cop just swaggers over to this guy leaving a bar and grabs him, throws him on the hood of his box Caprice, and harasses the guy for nothing. Even then it was shocking to me. Apparently that's just how it was back then.\n\nEDIT: This is getting a lot of upvotes, so I'm sure other people remember it. Can anyone find a link? I've never been able to find one, but the toss onto the hood was, I believe, incorporated into the opening montage for a season. It has to have occurred in a *very* early season.", "980" ], [ "Heehee, this was me with my Literature major. But it wasn't the medical type classes that put me off my Psyche major, it was when I heard that the four-year degree was worthless and I'd need \"at least a Master's\" in order to find entry-level work in the field. I didn't have time for that (already married with a kid and an apartment) and I didn't have the money for it either (already married with a kid and an apartment). Switched to Literature. Didn't end up in a teaching position, but rather an adult counselor-type role because the State Labor Department was the first to offer me a job. And... I haven't left yet.", "104" ], [ "Okay, so remember Back to the Future? <PERSON> had to stop <PERSON> from making it with <PERSON> to ensure that she got together with <PERSON>, because if <PERSON> and <PERSON> didn't get together at the \"Fish Under the Sea\" dance ^(I know that's not it's proper name) , then <PERSON> would never have been born.\n\nSame thing here. If <PERSON> had been able to keep Hot <PERSON> all to himself, he would never have gotten together with Regular <PERSON> and <PERSON> would never have been born.", "475" ], [ "It most definitely wasn't a date. She's got a boyfriend (and mentions it in *every* conversation) and I'm married. But we'd started a conversation walking into work and I wanted to expand on it some in a less-professional environment (it was political). I'm an office worker; \"going to lunch\" is what we do to socialize. \n\nShe and I don't work together, so I might've crossed a sort of professional boundary there.\n\nShe's given off indications before that she's hyper-sensitive about being \"hit on.\" She's one of those people you can't really do anything for without her thinking you're trying to get into her pants. She's actually a bit crazy, but nice enough and fun to talk to sometimes.\n\nSo ever since, she makes a point of being on her phone the entire walk from her parking space into the office. Every morning.\n\nMeh.", "603" ], [ "Ooh, I was in the vicinity one Black Friday when Power Rangers were hard to come by; I witnessed one woman start attacking another woman over snatching the (Pink? Yellow? Hard-to-find) Ranger out of her cart. \"I don't know what you're talking about, but it isn't yours until you've paid for it anyway,\" she said as she put her nose in the air and toddled off.\n\nIt was obvious what had happened. Hell, even /I/ wanted to punch her out!", "980" ], [ "You see them being interviewed on the news every year. These folks make a tradition of it. Some people pitch tents and bring thermoses of coffee. There's always some woman and her daughter telling the newscaster about how they wrapped up Thanksgiving dinner super early so they could hustle out here to stake a place in line.\n\nLike, gang? You're really missing the point of Thanksgiving. Yeah, the big TV for $200 is great and all, but your elderly parents aren't gonna be around for many more holidays, and that TV's gonna be $200 in just a couple years anyway. Remember when people got trampled to death to snatch up $30 DVD players? That's what they go for at retail *all the time* now!", "527" ], [ "The US has [slower internet speeds](_URL_3_) and [less access to it per capita](_URL_0_) than most other developed countries. What passes for broadband speeds in the US is embarrassing [next to South Korea and even Norway(!)](_URL_4_). And [we pay a shit-ton more for it](_URL_1_), too. Plus, ole [Chairman <PERSON> just screwed us all](_URL_2_) at the telecom industry's behest, so in addition to paying more for less, the ISP's we pay now have the ability to say, \"Nah, you don't need to visit that site--but if you really want to, it'll cost you extra.\"", "717" ], [ "Don't even get me started on the misuse of the word \"whenever.\"\n\n\"Whenever\" is supposed to be used to describe uncertainty, either because you're not sure the exact moment when something occurred, or because you're describing something intermittent and can't say for sure when it'll happen again.\n\n**Example:** Whenever it was that the car struck this pole, it has to have been before these people put their garbage out because you can see that the tire tracks go under the trash cans.\n\n**Example:** Whenever it rains, the cable goes out.\n\nYou're not supposed to use it to describe something you are certain about regarding time. That's what the word \"WHEN\" is for.\n\n**Example:** I told him he'd better shut up. He didn't. He made one more \"Your Momma so fat...\" joke. That's when I punched him in the mouth.\n\nBut--and I see this all the time on Judge Judy--when young people are describing events that occurred with certainty, they'll improperly use the word \"whenever.\"\n\n**Improper Example:** My shift ended at three. I got my time card, but *whenever* I went to punch out, the manager was there waiting for me to tell me I was fired.\n\nYou may not have noticed it, but start listening for it. Keep an ear out, you'll pick it up.\n\nEDIT: Here's a couple of others that have come to mind:\n\n\"Taken back\" instead of \"Taken aback.\"\n\n\"Irregardless\"\n\n\"Literally\" when they don't mean *literally*\n\n\"Altercation\" to describe anything from an argument to a full-on fistfight\n\n\"Drug\" instead of \"dragged\"\n\nWhen did \"anyway\" become pluralized? *\"Anyways...\"*\n\n\"Got incarcerated\" or \"was incarcerated\" instead of \"went to jail\" or \"served time.\" The difference here is in the tone of the action verb. *I got put in jail* is different from *I went to jail* in that the former externalizes agency. It's no longer something that *you did*, it's something that *was done to you.* The formality of the word \"incarcerated\" also makes it seem like a sophisticated or institutional process, something kind of mechanical and neutral and impersonal rather than a punishment, which of course would carry a negative connotation. The neutrality of the turn of phrase cleans up the situation and attempts to remove the stigma. Bad people *go to prison,* but anybody can *get incarcerated.*\n\nHave you noticed how many people don't \"live\" anywhere, but instead they \"stay at\" such-and-such a place?\n\nReddit is also always mixing up \"adverse\" with \"averse.\" You may be *averse* to a suggestion, but it's the *adverse* outcome that you really fear.\n\nAnd with everyone being so \"woke\" these days, how come so many people get \"triggered\" when controversial opinions are expressed?", "458" ], [ "My ultra-conservative Christian in-laws were travelling down south and, facing a Sunday away from home, needed to find a church in which to worship. They came upon a small clapboard baptist church, introduced themselves to the pastor, and everything was \"brother\" this and \"brother\" that, and they were made to feel quite welcome.\n\nBut when the sermon began, the pastor started railing against the evils of the Jewish media and the \"mud people.\"\n\nIt was one of *those* \"Southern Baptist\" churches. They sat there with their eyes popping out of their heads for a good minute or two trying to figure out what to do before dad decided it was time to go. Without a word they bolted to the car and took the hell off and didn't stop at a strange church again the rest of their trip, hahaha!", "193" ], [ "Yes, and that's what's surprising. One expects that South Korea is going to have easy access to high speed internet since they are a major tech hub and all of big smartphones manufacturers are located there. Likewise Japan: they're famously tech-centric. European countries are small and densely populated, so deployment there would be relatively easy too, and Europe has become a model for consumer-first policies that keep ISPs and other big companies from abusing the public like they do in the US. But the Scandinavian countries aren't renowned for being densely populated or for being major tech centers. They're not huge manufacturing or commercial centers either. So why would they have better, faster, and cheaper broadband than the US where the technology was born?\n\nI dunno why, but they do.", "79" ], [ "They're called [traffic circles](_URL_0_), and they're largely being replaced with safer, conventional intersections.\n\nTraffic circles don't scale well. They're fine until traffic gets really heavy, then it becomes a <PERSON>-style free-for-all with flashing lights, shrieking horns, broken mirrors and dented fenders. The Cardiff Circle in Egg Harbor Twp., Atlantic County, was the deadliest circle in New Jersey until it was finally transformed into a large square with four conventional intersections. (A little more than a decade later, the Shore Mall was demolished and the Cardiff Power Center--a shopping center across from the mall--lost its anchor stores (and subsequently most of the rest of the store fronts) as well, which also helps to moderate the amount of traffic through the area.)", "904" ], [ "> Or that a manager screaming obscenities and threatening half the team every day because it's not going so well at home will at least see a reprimand. \n\nI've experienced exactly this. At one job I worked, a new Regional Loss Prevention manager came in and gathered everyone up for a talk about how serious the threat of *shrink* was, and to scare everyone about how seriously things were going to be run from here on out. I asked a question about something he said. He didn't like the question. I became his target. I was fired soon after and found out later that he used my termination as an example to the rest of the team of how serious he was and how they'd all better shape up or they'd be next out the door. Needless to say--this was a Union-hostile workplace.\n\nMuch later in my life, I'm working at a Unionized site. We had a supervisor who was just crazy, drunk with power. He was verbally abusive to the staff. He made idle threats and idle promises, things he couldn't actually do--but who was gonna challenge him? He was a raving fucking lunatic*. He stood over this old lady and berated her and said to her, \"I can be your best friend or your worst enemy. You don't want to see the monster in me.\" Just a little old lady answering phones for fuck's sake.\n\nWell, I drafted a group grievance and sent it up the chain. He was reprimanded. He went back to his shit. I sent a second grievance. He was terminated.\n\nIn the former instance, we would have been completely without recourse. In the latter, we were able to get this crazy bastard replaced with some reasonable governance--which was better for the employees *and* the clients.\n\n\\* - *He was also probably a coke-head. He was certainly manic and had delusions of grandeur. Also talked non-stop, even spraying spittle while he was going on and on. Guy phrased everything in metaphors of violence, too. \"You're gonna do what I say the way I say until I tell you otherwise, or I'll keel-haul you!\" \"If you don't follow my orders exactly, I'll string you up!\" \"Such-and-such-concept is the enemy--we'll march together and destroy the enemy!\" Dude never had a single day of actual military service.*", "428" ], [ "The one I like that gets trotted out a lot is, \"Imagine you see something that needs tending to in an adjacent department. Only you're not allowed to take care of it because of cumbersome union rules that strictly divide employees by department. We don't think that's a good way to go. In our company, we're family, and we look after each other.\"\n\nThat's ridiculous. Now, it is true that some of that kind of thing goes on at union construction sites: only electricians can plug power tools into outlets and things like that. Seems ridiculous, and maybe some of it is turf and job protection, but mostly it's because on a construction site you can't know what's going on elsewhere in the building, and that circuit may be live, may not be live, may not be complete, and/or may represent a shock hazard. You're a carpenter, you don't know. Who does? The electricians.", "334" ] ]
124
[ 2532, 2766, 13364, 15626, 9995, 3992, 14297, 19878, 18660, 14287, 10840, 24370, 4233, 15562, 22569, 5902, 23784, 9566, 21110, 15777, 8708, 2178, 16169, 17747, 22151, 18541, 4658, 16394, 11846, 19751, 755, 23996, 4903, 24272, 8019, 23661, 24853, 23273, 8699, 6820, 8901, 1211, 14828, 12396, 22776, 21660, 12961, 21672, 101, 5284, 19041, 4158, 2291, 13925, 16732, 4633, 9676, 19040, 18398, 16994, 10451, 5004, 688, 15943, 448, 15319, 23195, 13349, 5452, 6508, 4687, 19811, 9518, 4210, 21810, 11531, 25257, 10852, 10923, 6771, 14907, 20194, 23484, 22650, 22966, 15716, 6840, 5032, 22514, 14101, 8462, 5954, 21376, 5184, 17600, 15052, 1448, 19063, 9656, 22470, 4517, 6885, 2058, 7742, 12714, 14054, 9283, 423, 23021, 18314, 7062, 3086, 6179, 12252, 23961, 11405, 21532, 19950, 21009, 3491, 17142, 11795, 14157, 12787, 22634, 8341, 17829, 18311, 18339, 10318, 15796, 18084, 25303, 18724, 24145, 18789, 2064, 5833, 23851, 20640, 18519, 5559, 16203, 21575, 20412, 2763, 3885, 15335, 997, 12611, 7911, 13810, 19273, 10115, 12469, 7679, 21888, 11970, 17620, 14041, 4178, 16920, 4080, 6036, 13135, 15984, 17042, 13424, 12401, 14840, 13895, 19754, 7219, 20348, 12946, 7619, 22772, 17633, 9309, 1842, 4434, 15101, 14909, 14071, 14784, 4924, 12295, 8254, 4644, 15177, 9701, 13150, 16264, 4986, 10248, 21578, 6659, 20086, 11410, 3739, 23254, 5575, 19737, 6634, 21215, 13554, 18351, 23906, 6794, 23369, 11899, 635, 6898, 341, 16393, 24127, 10884, 1023, 4931, 3731, 10764, 11940, 20244, 2229, 24639, 18123, 23693, 10033, 21559, 9956, 151, 13051, 15290, 24703, 7052, 1894, 6389, 15306, 6334, 20944, 13294, 22518, 20287, 13466, 20735, 20313, 20255, 13805, 21025, 6320, 23177, 7850, 4425, 12535, 14747, 22371, 7336, 469, 17218, 23689, 23858, 3968, 7140, 11451, 24416, 3476, 23839, 9545, 15850, 14817, 7501, 7299, 3908, 7703, 8680, 6132, 8618, 4393, 16478, 2096, 20190, 22126, 12636, 16352, 16128, 9781, 11081, 5382, 4390, 4333, 13062, 19219, 9481, 9937, 18198, 4777, 4008, 20824, 16226, 25300, 8220, 3096, 18119, 6000, 19364, 5341, 16574, 24118, 2179, 16675, 4289, 3183, 3432, 20306, 24269, 4583, 23752, 13166, 19105, 24353, 23824, 10458, 11860, 13190, 13066, 19290, 22640, 24196, 23671, 17299, 17750, 20910, 8201, 10400, 1502, 12004, 2830, 13807, 10787, 24555, 1809, 11669, 18506, 25453, 19509, 8027, 4325, 2278, 22256, 15149, 5328, 7940, 6828, 10589, 6319, 24495, 19716, 8432, 10655, 23320, 17845, 19845, 18033, 7156, 17250, 7652, 9963, 15134, 12690, 15173, 8905, 20221, 1739, 6064, 4537, 22875, 5226, 24938, 24506, 20540, 10371, 11858, 9670, 3551, 18652, 3043, 13956, 51, 1262, 22480, 18748, 10466, 22880, 17004, 14608, 3570, 15602, 13160, 8999, 10354, 21341, 5160, 20760, 19409, 18649, 15978, 4050, 24399, 15015, 7445, 24941, 2152, 17947, 8476, 14838, 21037, 10630, 12897, 23507, 11291, 19955, 11264, 23531, 20773, 2433, 14298, 16643, 16332, 9073, 2390, 6559, 22483, 5820, 20825, 2835, 5312, 21591, 12960, 10427, 15064, 10810, 9317, 14317, 20032, 9552, 18187, 21564, 12678, 11596, 12775, 13254, 16633, 3751, 7642, 1255, 2001, 8859, 1624, 22084, 23691, 246, 12354, 15473, 12170, 10391, 7966, 11576, 11665, 9467, 23433, 21351, 19568, 18148, 23219, 16505, 21094, 10629, 9734, 18742, 13887, 10546, 21682, 21095, 23922, 23103, 2203, 8174, 10924, 13298, 25418, 6735, 16235, 14993, 22912, 14517, 7009, 18354, 3930, 25029 ]
reddit_dump_-Reactionary_Vizier-
[ [ "Here's some good hotkeys for troop control in battle (these are HD edition hotkeys which I guess is what you have, voobly or disk may be different, but you can also set your own hotkeys). I think you need to press a button next to the minimap to see the advanced formations and stances, which are very useful\n\nA - sets the selected units to Aggressive Stance. useful when you want some melee troops to go absolutely ham especially cavalry, don't use this often as they will run off and get killed usually.\n\nS- Defensive Stance. Defensive stance is great and should be viewed as the default stance for most situations. It lets you put your troops somewhere and they'll stay reasonably close, but still be able to move around a bit to attack nearby enemies. \n\nD- Stand Ground Stance - no moving around. This is often useful for archers. Since they have range, you don't want them chasing after a specific enemy troop when they can simply change target easily. I find this makes my archers way more effective.\n\nZ- Line formation. This is the basic formation you want to use most of the time. Except for......\n\nC- Spread formation. Use this against enemy AoE attacks like onagers/scorpions.\n\nAlso try to keep up technologically, AoE punishes you hard for being behind in blacksmith or other techs\n\nuse building selection hotkeys, rally point and unit production hotkeys to easily reinforce mid battle. For example, you want more crossbows? Crtl-A to select the range, shift-A to queue multiple crossbowmen, right click to a suitable rally point", "500" ], [ "They also changed Martyrdom to Sacrifice; looks like political correctness to me. \n\nFun fact, did you know that aoe2 was originally going to accurately portray janissaries as having white hats, but removed the hats because those braindead soyboy libtards thought it looked like the KKK? _URL_0_ see trivia section. Lol who needs historical accuracy in a mediaeval setting when you can censor things as part of a circlejerk about 20th/21st century politics instead", "267" ], [ "Wow, you have just devastated me. I was really hoping that an internet argument over a tech name in a decades old computer game was going to be 'RELEVANT' lol\n\nI love being an edgelord on the internet, it's funny to see people get triggered over nothing and trying to come up with weak counterarguments, not because I said anything incorrect, but because I said it in a MEAN way :( :( :(", "342" ], [ "> Right so they destroyed nothing\n\nOBVIOUSLY changing an interesting and unique name to a generic one is destructive. They destroyed the original name and replaced it with something far less flavourful. Do you think pedantry is clever or something?\n\n > You don't get to talk shit about other people probably being offended by words, because you ARE so offended by words\n\nI am offended by the removal of a word, not by the inclusion of its replacement. How are you actually dumb enough to get this completely the wrong way round lmao", "730" ], [ "> They didn't censor anything stupid, the changed the names. \n\nIt's clearly politically motivated censorship when they change the two most potentially offensive tech names. And obviously replacing a thing with something else is a tool censors can and do use.\n\nI don't even play Age of Build Orders any more, so I am not persecuted, I am just pointing out how absolutely pathetic leftists are that they censor anything that *might* be offensive", "342" ], [ "How exactly am I persecuted by a change to a game I don't play, in an edition I will never purchase? My interest is just pointing out how leftist game designers (or in this case rehashers) let their shitty politics get in the way of cool features. Also arguing with all the triggered kids like you who try to score points while not having any actual points to make\n\n > \"Leftists\" censored nothing.\n\nit's all very well saying that while totally failing to provide any alternative explanation for the change\n\n > Microsoft edited their IP as they see fit and have every right to do.\n\nObviously. So what, you can still bitch about something even if it's legally allowed.", "793" ], [ "> took a time machine and went back to 1999\n\nLeftism has always been a thing, it got particularly obnoxious starting with the Enlightenment, or maybe the Reformation actually. EPIC time machine fantasy, really btfoed me!!\n\n > destroy some random-ass videogame? (And \"destroy\" is really over-selling it here; it was one change. Literally just one.) \n\nBut I didn't say they destroyed the game, I complained about them destroying a feature in the game. Then I noticed they also changed Martyrdom for the same reason. So it's not one feature but two. You are trying to score petty little pedantic points off me, but you're just showing you have poor reading comprehension.\n\n > the evil almighty SJeWs would do something more substantial \n\nThey have of course", "965" ], [ "Lol you guys are so sad, you each have one or another subreddit you reference that exists purely for people to bitch and feel intellectually superior, how pathetic\n\nThe left has done lots of things obviously, why do you want me to point out something the left has done in the past few centuries? What sort of bizarre non-question is that? Am I supposed to be talking only about SJWs because you say so? More terrible reading comprehension", "965" ], [ "I didn't call you a leftist. By 'you guys' I just mean whiny, girly redditors who flock around someone being rude and react with pathetic non-arguments trying to score points.\n\nEvery single time you reply it's as if you read my comment from a parallel universe because your reading comprehension is so poor.\n\nWhy the fuck should I give you a citation that the left exists and has done things? What sort of retarded question is that? At least you have the intelligence to not take this too seriously (o Rational Skeptic) and make me feel like I'm the one being trolled.\n\nWhen the rehasher-devs replace the names of Jihad and Martyrdom, do you really not see that it's obvious political correctness?", "965" ], [ "I am British myself, and the politics are more leftwing here, although we did win Brexit (I support UKIP, which is the most right-wing of the noteworthy parties and has about 10-15% of the vote). \n\nAnyhow I did talk as if my point was valid for the USA so I shall try to defend it there.\n\nThese are individually weak points but hopefully together they make my claim to be a political 'minority' less indulgent and foolish.\n\n-Utter overwhelming majority of big newspapers supporting <PERSON>\n\n-Republican Party being 'moderate' in my eyes, with <PERSON> being the most radical (not so much further to the right, but certainly more radical) of the Republican candidates, and attacked/delegitimised by the establishment candidates much more than is normal.\n\n-Clinton being a bizarrely weak choice, even literally with the health issues. Easily could have been a Democrat elected if it hadn't been such a hollow career politician at the helm. And to be pedantic, <PERSON> *did* lose the popular vote.\n\n-People in my demographic group - university students - being much more leftwing than the general population. I think I am easily in the 'most right-wing' 1% of that social group.\n\n-Half of my family is far-right (soldiers of Rhodesia) and the other far left (as in politicised uni subject straight into leftist pro-refugee government-harrying NGO). I've been attacked verbally very viciously, but also physically (only by a woman though), by the leftwing side; I also had a sister be repeatedly rude to our father for him being 'racist' and then she cut me off when I responded rudely about 'buzzwords....' at some length. So it really seems to me like the left is much more violent and expects people to submit to their views. They really hate it when people don't share their values, unless it's Islamic colonists of course. Even when they're not technically the majority they think they are and they act like it. That's not just in my family but also in general we've seen serious violence from the left in the past few months in America. \n\n-Also, if you wanted to get into trouble with law enforcement, or jeopardise employment prospects by voicing unpalatable politicial views, you can do that very easily by making far-right statements, but you can't so easily achieve the same effect by voicing far-left statements. (for example, when trying to make a good response to your other comment I saw this headline on Breitbart: ''French Mayor Faces Fine for Calling 91% Muslim Classrooms a ‘Problem’'')\n\nSo..... individually those are pretty weak arguments and you were probably right to pull me up sharp on that one! So despite my excuses I concede your point.", "886" ], [ "It's a distraction from good governance. If a politician can get into power by appealing to ethnic identity, that means it becomes less and less about actually doing a good job, and more and more about setting one group against the other, doing what's best for a subgroup rather than for everyone.\n\nThe surest way to avoid that, in my view, is to have a monocultural, monoethnic state. You can't have racial tension if everyone is the same race :p Although clearly that's no longer possible for the USA, it's still beneficial if we keep the lid on identity politics.", "1020" ], [ "But is that the issue? If that was all there was to it, then the Tibetan population would eventually recover, things would eventually go back to a sort of normality in future generations. But with all the Han Chinese coming in, the Tibetans lose the cultural and demographic majority. They may well be permanently dissolved as a nation through assimilation and colonising immigration. If there were no immigrants, just a Chinese state apparatus, then if ever the Chinese government collapsed, or became liberal and granted independence/autonomy, the Tibetan nation would still exist. But with a Han majority, if those things ever happened the new Tibet would still not be Tibetan. It's only with immigration that the nation can truly be destroyed.", "839" ], [ "> things I learned about in grade school that are generally considered as morally bankrupt \n\nWhat exactly is 'generally considered'? You're directly saying that everyone should accept childhood political indoctrination and expect everyone else to agree with it too.\n\nI mean, sure you can be puzzled about why someone holds a view so different to your own, that's natural, just like it's natural for every culture to indoctrinate its children with certain values. But it's ironic to hear such cultural supremacism and rigid 'traditionalism' from a leftwinger :p", "151" ], [ "Well, it'd be nice if it wasn't political, but I think it is. Especially since some religions, like Islam, are inherently very political indeed.\n\nAlso, with judging a racial group - to treat an individual differently, is wrong, because you can judge them as an individual. But it's a fact, maybe a sad one, that as groups the different races aren't all in the exact same situation. I think to judge a group as a group is quite normal. Regardless of the reasons behind it, it *is* a fact that blacks are more likely to be criminal. Taking it to fear and hatred is a bit far, but you can still acknowledge the fact.", "271" ], [ "They do have stuff like (national council of) 'La Raza'. Also, depending on the definition, a colony can simply be a group of people forming a community in a foreign land. Do that enough, and the whole place has been colonised, as a new language, political/cultural slant or religion, and such, become much more influential.\n\nThey also have multiculturalism and the left as a vehicle; not so much for creating a new unitary culture of their own, certainly, but with great potential for crippling the old.", "824" ], [ "You can totally have a negative opinion about a group of people in general, while having a positive opinion about individuals in that group. Or vice versa. \n\nOr you can note individuals you like, without it really changing your logical views of their entire group (might change the subconscious views).\n\nOr you could consider subdivisions within the 'black people' group, to say that for example - the blacks who had stable families can turn out great, but the inner city blacks with terrible, undisciplined schools and fragmented families will have a very hard time (As someone who saw very little of my father in childhood, due to divorce - I think this is an extremely serious issue). In that case it's no longer really a skin colour thing, but a marriage thing. *However*, you'd notice single motherhood doesn't occur at the same rate between races - due to historical reasons, say. In that case, the true essence of the issue isn't race, but upbringing. \n\nNow, you can't tell at a glance whether or not someone was brought up by both parents. You can certainly tell what race they are, though!", "987" ], [ "Here's an example - I'm 4.6k, but I really, really can't be bothered to time 1000s of autoattacks properly, so I only play support because the lasthitting minigame is too much 'effort' for me.\n\nIf you want a more quantifiable metric - how about pings on spells and items? Bonus for pings calling out enemy blink daggers, shadow blades, bkbs, and observers. I am pretty sure some of this sort of data is available on _URL_0_\n\nAnother thing could be how varied the location of sentries and observers is. If they're in the same places every game, that could be a low effort player", "430" ], [ "Sounds like a dodgy and inexact, back-of-an-envelope calculation. However, it's clearly that the number is way too damn high, possibly a majority of the young Muslim colonists.\n\nI think we need to go through the paki population with a fine-toothed comb to identify the Islamists and deport them. Anything from 10%-50% should be stripped of their citizenship and deported, and the rest clearly told that they must behave themselves or else.\n\n In this country, if the police see a burkha or an islamic man wearing a large beard, they should tear the burkha off and drag the man into a police station and shave the beard off. There's absolutely no reason for explicit symbols of Islamism to be permitted.", "972" ], [ "Eastern Europe has always been less developed than Western, even going back to the Roman Empire when Britannia was a province and the future slav areas were quite desolate.\n\nThe USSR reinforced this.\n\nRacial makeup is a red herring, and I'm sure the comparison is less flattering if you compare the behaviour of western nonwhites, especially muslims, to Eastern Europe.", "842" ], [ "Seems like good changes but nothing too interesting, just a lot of small VERY sensible changes\n\nNotice how they added a bunch of advertising for their dogshit weeb arcana but couldn't be bothered to give the new tower armour buff any description or icon\n\nAll the OP heroes are still OP and the underpowered still underpowered, just not as badly", "880" ], [ "Her 4k and 5k winrates are okay at 47-48%. I think it would be even higher if <PERSON> weren't so popular, as pudge is one of her best counters. Also, I think there aren't many dedicated <PERSON> players so the hero is often played very badly - needs some practice to be played properly. Edit: just checked dotabuff and apparently there's a 'meta trend' this week with her having 53% winrate in 5k+.\n\nHowever, at the 6k+ or professional bracket <PERSON> does appear to be nonexistent. I am not sure how much she needs to be buffed to bring her into the meta.\n\n<PERSON> is good when her allies have stuns. She is good against carries that have weak or no nukes, especially if melee, so that they can be jewed by decrepify. She is good against heroes without stuns, good against heroes with poor juking, high manacost spells, and low HP heroes she can simply nuke to smithereens. She is good against highground defense since she can demolish towers from further away than any other hero, even sniper, and doesn't need hg vision to do it. \n\nShe is bad against most strength heroes apart from Timbersaw, because they have high hp, low manacost spells, good stuns. She is also bad against splitpushing and escape.\n\nYou can often decide to pick her based on 'number of strength heroes on my team minus number of strength heroes on theirs'.\n\n_URL_0_\n\nI have a perfectly reasonable time playing her in pubs, you have lots of damage, amazing pushing (easiest highground siege ever) and you can constantly jew enemy carries with decrep, especially if they're melee or have no nukes. \n\nI think urn is extremely underrated on her. You can heal allies' health with urn allowing you to then restore their mana with your ult. The stats are also even better on Pugna than on most heroes. Also, I've been intending to try out Pipe sometime, since physical damage is already covered by decrepify, and it fits with 5 man pushing. Aether Lens is a totally core item, even more so than Aghs.\n\nI would like to see a buff to ward's mana degen, and maybe making Lifedrain grow more damaging the longer a channel lasts.\n\nAlthough, I do wonder if it would be interesting to grant Free Movement (like Brood has) to decrepified units. Would probably have to reinstate the allied slow for that.", "395" ], [ "<PERSON>'s interventions have been relatively small and cheap for Russia, working with local ethnic groups or powers - Ossetians, russians living in Ukraine, <PERSON>. Crimea was gained almost effortlessly.\n\nThe West's interventions since 2001 in the Middle east have been huge in scale, highly destructive, vastly more expensive, and based on a shoehorned ideal of democracy, rather than on the political factions which are actually present in these countries. \n\nIn my opinion the true division in the politics of a middle eastern state is between secular and islamist, not between democratic and authoritarian. It's nice that Tunisia managed a democracy of sorts but I don't think it's practicable nor a priority elsewhere.\n\nWhere <PERSON> is cautious and competent, the Western leaders have been insanely ambitious and foolish. \n\n<PERSON> didn't want us to depose <PERSON> and has been proved right.\n\nHe didn't want us to depose <PERSON> and I believe he has been proven right on that score as well, although it's more ambiguous.\n\nHe was never hostile to <PERSON> while the West stupidly gave him a cold shoulder at times.\n\nAnd lastly, I cannot imagine that <PERSON> would ever get embroiled in something as insanely stupid as the Iraq and Afghan nation-building exercises. Admittedly there is the Ukraine war, but that is being run in a much more low-key manner.\n\nHe works with <PERSON>, a stark contrast to the coalition's de-Ba'athisation and army disbandment in Iraq, which strikes me as utterly absurd. Generally, the army in an Arab state is vital for stability and is also a secular instution. Weaken it and you get Islamist chaos. Details such as this are far more important than vague plans to establish a democracy over an unready and divided populace.\n\nI support interventionism as a general principle, but not when it is totally incompetent. I don't trust the Western liberals to ever understand how to do it properly.\n\nLastly, I do not view Russia as much of an aggressor, certainly not from the perspective of the USA or Britain - although I do understand the perspective of Russia's immediate neighbours. Certainly we should remain allied with the Baltics, and not let Russia menace Poland or cross the Dnieper. But it's actually the West which has vindictively attacked the Russian economy with sanctions, making life harder for innocent Russians and boosting their support for <PERSON>. The Russians haven't done that sort of thing to us.\n\nThis kinda sums it up:\n\n > At a news conference at the G-8 summit in St. Petersburg, President <PERSON>, describing to reporters his meeting with Russian president <PERSON>, reproached Russia for failing to live up to democratic ideals. “I talked about my desire to promote institutional change in parts of the world like Iraq where there’s a free press and free religion, and I told him that a lot of people in our country would hope that Russia would do the same thing.”\n\n > <PERSON> replied to <PERSON>’s criticism by knocking it out of the park: “We certainly would not want to have the same kind of democracy as they have in Iraq, I will tell you quite honestly.”\n\n > According to the AP, “<PERSON>’s face reddened as he tried to laugh off the remark.” Then <PERSON> essayed his own comeback, which was not in the same league as <PERSON>’s. “Just wait,” <PERSON> said about Iraq.", "381" ], [ "If <PERSON> had been allowed to use chemical weapons the war would (Edit:might, or it would have helped at least) be over, but apparently it's more unacceptable to kill thousands swiftly than tens of thousands over the course of years.\n\nBetter not let anyone use a weapon that would negate the defender's advantage in urban areas! Gotta make sure it drags out for, hmm, maybe a decade should be nice. Much more humane.", "1014" ], [ "I think the contrasts you mention, while still there, might be softened by the generally low/informal quality of troops in the war, especially on the rebel side.\n\nIt seems like a lost cause to me to try to minimise civilian casualties in such a conflict, where it's mainly urban fighting and the ethnic/sectarian civilian presence has military significance, other than simply trying to win as swiftly as possible. \n\nYou could call it the Hiroshima & Nagasaki principle.", "1014" ], [ "> The problem is the assumption that they're effective. They manage to be both pretty ineffective at dealing with combatants and terrible for civilians. \n\nBut aren't the troops in Syria generally poor quality, or at least certainly not trained or equipped against gas attacks?\n\nIf you're correct, aren't such programs are simply a waste of resources? Then why be paranoid about them so as to have international agreements - why not let their own ineffectuality cause their disappearance? Why would a government want to use them?\n\nAlso, weren't they powerful in World War I - and isn't urban warfare comparable to trench warfare to some extent, with all the entrenched infantry and the extremely slow-moving battle lines?\n\nObviously I didn't mean to imply they have comparable strength to nuclear weapons. \n\nI'm not persuaded on N & H. Supposing the Soviet entry was sufficient to cause the Japanese to surrender: that means the nukes were unnecessary, but it hardly means that by themselves they wouldn't have been sufficient.\n\nN & H is not the only example of nuclear deterrence. What of the USSR's vast army, poised to invade Europe? Was it not discouraged by non-conventional weapons? Why was the Cold War Cold? Even the newspaper article you linked me suggests that one motive for the N & H bombings may have been to intimidate the Soviets. I can't read your first link as it wants sign-in.\n\nThe last one discusses non-nuclear destruction of cities from the historical record - such as the conventional bombing of Tokyo you mentioned. Naturally I was thinking to myself that 'surely nuclear weapons are more fearsome and therefore the comparison is not there'. The article dismisses that idea with the vague aphorism ''means\nare\nrarely\nmore\nimportant\nthan\nends'', which I don't consider an impressive argument at all. Consider 9/11 as just one example; It was given an importance totally out of proportion to the casualties. They are ignoring the psychological element.\n\nAnd they say\n\n > The\nmutual\ncaution\nof\nthe\nCold\nWar\nis\nevidence\nthat\nnuclear\nweapons\nare\ndangerous\n,\nnot\nthat\nthey\nare\neffective\nweapons\nof\nwar\nor\nuseful\nfor\nthreatening\n\nDangerous so as to engender caution, but not effective in war or for deterrent? Sounds like paradox. The same paradoxical attitude you express, that such weapons are powerful yet weak, useless yet unacceptable. They're so useless that they should be banned.\n\nAnd then they practically say 'the fact that nuclear weapons are dangerous and inspire caution is not proof of deterrence'! Nonsense!\n\nAnd it says lots of other stuff, like the Third Punic War being the *only* ever war of extermination, or comparing one-sided extermination of cities in conventional war to the two-sided extermination offered in nuclear deterrent. Only in nuclear deterrent is the conventionally stronger party under equal threat.\n\nI do wonder if perhaps nukes are not useful as a proper military weapon (I'm no expert). But even then, isn't it clear from the attitudes of many historical figures that nukes held a psychological value? Paper money could be said to be worthless, but it is valuable because people think it is.", "1014" ], [ "> I honestly don't know why I'm bothering to talk to you about this; the stuff you've said so far shows so little respect for human life, suffering, and international norms of war. It's a little sociopathic\n\nI would like to see civilian casualties minimised by one side winning the war, instead of having been hamstrung by Western sanctions, threats and aid to its enemies. I am concerned for civilians, but not in a way that might override military convenience. Especially since in this sort of conflict the line between military and militia and civilian becomes ever more blurred - it's far easier to hold territory where the populace is sympathetic, making them a militarily useful feature. For some of the nastier elements the ethnic makeup isn't merely useful or detrimental, but also something that can be changed as an objective; so I'm not convinced a civilian-military dichotomy is really applicable, although it must be an appealing narrative. So tld;dr yeah I guess my views are a little sociopathic.\n\n > if you paid attention to the examples of Iraq and Angola\n\nSo I looked up the Angolan war and I see this in wikipedia - ''Although the status of its own chemical weapons program remained uncertain, South Africa also deceptively bombarded Cuban and Angolan units with coloured smoke in an attempt to induce hysteria or mass panic.[75] According to Defence Minister <PERSON>, this would force the Cubans to share the inconvenience of having to take preventative measures such as donning NBC suits, which would cut combat effectiveness in half. The tactic was effective: beginning in early 1988 Cuban units posted to Angola were issued with full protective gear in anticipation of a South African chemical strike''\n\nIf you want me to 'pay attention' to those examples, how about a source? Preferably one I can read, not from <PERSON>.\n\nYou didn't seem to directly answer my question about why chemical weapons didn't fall out of favour by themselves if they're so ineffective. Why would treaties be necessary?\n\n > deploying weapons which disparately hurt civilians means that wars completely destroy the livelihood of a country when they conclude, rather than forcing political concessions and a military surrender.\n\nGood thing that didn't happen, Syria is doing just fine. Only *normal* methods of killing and ethnic cleansing are being used. I can agree that such devastating long-term effects should be considered to some extent, but at this point the war itself might be long-term.\n\n > [In WW1] Additionally, no, they weren't terribly useful. They did very little damage to troops\n\nOnly 1.2 million casualties. Admittedly most were able to return to duty after a while.\n\nAlso, when I try to look up why chemical weapons weren't used in WW2, I see claims not just that they'd not have been useful against the quality forces involved, but also that neither side wanted to open that can of worms. The latter rather contradicts the idea that chemical weapons are useless - as does the Iran-Iraq war. Weren't they quite powerful there?\n\n > The costs both in terms of human life and material cost of a conventional war were certainly more significant. It's an appealing narrative, but it gives entirely too much credit to nuclear war rather than the cost of having a large-scale international war, nuclear or not\n\nThe rest of the time you point out that nuclear weapons are uniquely devastating, due to destroying entire cities, but somehow they aren't a massive part of the 'cost' of a potential war? I don't agree that a Power is only deterred by threats against its military, although it must be an appealing narrative.\n\n > nuclear weapons...... impact is felt most by civilians and not by the military\n\nTactical nukes are a also thing, but I suppose we have ended up discussing strategic nukes.\n\nWhy do you think so many powers have put so much effort in nuclear weapons over the years? North Korea, Iran, Israel, India & Pakistan..... are they all just mistaken fools, while you know better? (They might be wrong, I am not trying to argue sarcastically that the minority view must be wrong).", "1014" ], [ "> IMO this is how you properly engage with muslims. Deny them a platform and isolate them into ghettos.\n > \n > \n > \n > As I've been proven again and again you are not interested in civil discourse in it's essence, and you are only interested in upholding liberal values like freedom of speech and freedom of ideas when it serves your purposes, when it allows you to recruit and spread your feeble and diseased ideology. I've been told many times that we \"liberals\" are obligated to hear you out because it is \"our ideology\" to respect different opinions, and following that, be forced to hear that this \"opinion\" you want so hard to have metastasized, actually has an end-game objective of stripping society of these same liberal values like freedom of ideas that got you into power in the first place.\n > \n > \n > \n > Well, no more. Fuck off back to your sad little bigot hovels. I'm glad you're gone, and I spit on your face.\n\ntrololol", "293" ], [ "> You conveniently missed quite a bit of that wikipedia article, so yes, you do need to pay more attention: \n\nNo, I read that part too. What point is to be found there? I have been talking about the military impact, not disputing environmental stuff.\n\n > given the expense of chemical weapons compared to conventional weapons, the extent to which they were deployed, and more of those casualties being injuries rather than deaths, no, they are not effective\n\nAre you going to bother looking into what those costs were, the extent, or anything else? Or will you just state that? I don't think it's practical to quntify such things anyway. Apart from anything else, it forced the opposing side into their own expensive research.\n\n > Chemical weapons are not tremendously effective against the military but could be used to create chaos among civilians; this tactic is considered unacceptable, so chemical weapons, along with biological weapons, which again pose their greatest threats to civilians, are considered taboo.\n\nOkay, I see now. Although clearly I don't have quite the standard views of what's acceptable or not, or what's civilian or not in such a conflict. And I hardly think an infantry and artillery assault on a town is going to be much better for those living in it.\n\n > The uniqueness of nuclear weapons is the degree to which they create lasting damage after the war has concluded to civilians and the environment\n\nAnd isn't that a large part of why they're a good deterrent, unless we suppose that such concerns aren't considered by the great powers? And you seem to contradict yourself, saying that nuclear weapons have a uniquely long term impact, but then saying that *any* war, even non-nuclear, would have huge impact on the ensuing peacetime. Which is all true, but aren't the points being made there contradictory?", "470" ], [ "What a bunch of cliches about 'change'.\n\n > Progress is struck down by conservatives, but throughout history, the only way we've been able to make it to this point in time through advances in science such as medicine and technology\n\nIt's pretty rare for the right to outright oppose scientific improvements. Scientific progress is the most important thing for humanity; moral or political '*progress*' is thorougly dubious. The two should not be conflated!\n\n > People must be open minded to others cultures even if it might seem to destroy your own.\n\nIs this a troll post? A lot of what culture is, is saying things you *must* do, or *mustn't* do. Obviously this means that different cultures can be categorically incompatible, in which case you can only combine them by destroying parts of them.\n\nThe rest of your post is painting the left's racial agendas as fair-minded and beneficial, which it isn't.", "348" ], [ "> I sense some ideological hostility here.\n\nYeah, it's unfortunate that I was the first to make it explicit, it's a cheap thing to do. But I really do think your positions are based on ideology not a natural analysis. You think your positions aren't ideological because you've allowed yourself to be ''educated'' by ''neutral'' sources which you unfortunately thought were neutral.\n\n > I don't give a flying FUCK what <PERSON> did.\n\nSo then why are you expressing opinions on Islam? If you don't care about <PERSON>, you don't care about Islam.\n\nIslam is a political ideology as well as a religion. \n\n > Do you know who also use religion as an ideology?\n\nProphet <PERSON>. \n\nIn stark contrast, <PERSON>, <PERSON> and a fair few others didn't use their new religion as a basis for making themselves a powerful tyrant. In fact it's thought by some that <PERSON> sold <PERSON> out precisely because he was resentful of <PERSON>'s refusal to foment an anti-Roman rebellion. 'King of the Jews' was never intended to be a practical title.\n\nIf the Vatican defined Christianity the way <PERSON> defines Islam, I would be hostile to Christianity most likely. The Vatican and the Papacy as a state, and the Pope as a powerful political figure who even lead armies at times, weren't really required in christian ideology: that's why they were always weaker compared to their Islamic counterpart, the Caliph. The Caliph isn't just a religious leader like the Pope but also a *by definition* an imperial and military ruler. It was a big thing in the Mediaeval era several times - the Holy Roman Emperor having a very dubious and often hostile relationship with the Pope. In Islamic civilisation the great emperor and the great religious leader, far from ever being at odds, were the same person. In the West we had a separation of political and spiritual power that Muslims didn't have, and that's one reason our civilisation was and is superior. I'd be making this argument even if ISIS didn't exist, but I think the way they're causing mayhem is a nice little cherry on top so I will bring them up too. \n\nThe Vatican only really ever had a proper claim on holy grounds within rome - a subsection of a city. The Papacy did sometimes swell to control central Italy, but it could never compete with the power of a Caliph.\n\n > If you try to bring this shit up again then I swear to God I'm going to lose my fucking mind. Fuck me.\n\nIslam is a political ideology, as well as a religion. It was used by <PERSON> to make him a powerful ruler, and by his successors to conquer vast territories, and to rewrite the customs and laws of the Arabs, and to destroy the pagan religion of Arabia. but go on claiming that's not an ideology for whatever bizarre reason.\n\n > Excuse me for being blunt, but holy fuck. I can almost feel my sanity waving goodbye.\n\nLack of arguments detected :)\n\n > I will most likely be ignoring your next reply\n\nYou shouldn't express opinions on this topic ever again, all you have is anti-historical bigoted lies.", "680" ], [ "The botched final act is why I left a negative review. All that time looking for a way to fix the resonance chamber but it just floats into the room after half an hour offscreen with a <PERSON> who was still covered in <PERSON> vomit. In general the areas are quite claustrophobic, with some cut entirely. You can see the loose ends of cut content in many places.\n\nAlso the setting is too much random, disconnected atomised trinkets, with little or no cohesion. The frustration from that is exacerbated by the overly adjective-heavy writing. Sometimes less is more. Plus, I don't find an endless series of literal *Deus Ex Machina*s a satisfying narrative device.\n\nThe character portraits are apparently photos of faces that then got surrounds painted onto them - <PERSON>'s face is set square to the camera while his body and head are at an angle. Not only that but I saw some much better alternative portraits, which Inexile made, which looked far better than those used ingame, for <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>. The ones in game are expressionless; that's arguably fitting for <PERSON> and <PERSON> and <PERSON>, who are cold, depressed and vacant respectively. But the alternative portrait for <PERSON> is so superior - it expresses her personality very well. Reminds me of an exgirlfriend of mine.\n\nAlso, what's with the lighting being so flat?\n\nHowever, Rhin is not only good, but is something I've never seen in an RPG before. very unusual concept. It's a decent/good game but it's so obviously worse than what it should have been, it pisses me off.", "148" ], [ "I have no clue why you don't think it's political. It's very obviously an extremely political religion. It was absolutely used as an ideology to create an empire, including by <PERSON> himself.\n\nIt very plainly has ambitions to political power, to create a legal system in its own image, to make non-Muslims 2nd-class citizens in order to pressure them to convert. This is all in the core Islamic scriptures.\n\nFor comparison, Judaism is also a political ideology, but it's a nationalist one, so its politics are only relevant within Israel. It states that there's a jewish nation, and that it should rule itself in its homeland. Meanwhile Islam is open-ended and effectively seeks world domination, as should be obvious from that fact that within 120 years of <PERSON>'s death his successors had fought Franks in the West and Chinamen in the East.", "680" ], [ "> Ideologies haven't even existed as a concept for more than a century or two.\n\n?!?? Where on earth did you get this amazingly stupid idea?\n\nYou said 'I don't care what <PERSON> did', making it clear you don't care about Islam. Now you say you don't know about the huge number of ideologies that have existed throughtout history. You don't care about Islam, and you don't know anything about history apart from 'muh poverty!' and 'It's the fault of Western Imperialism!'. Since you don't know anything about Islam or history, you shouldn't hold or express any opinions about these things.\n\nIslam is not a race. It is an ideology. <PERSON> was the first Islamist terrorist, he created an ideology and used it to make himself a powerful political figure.\n\nAmazing how you think it's a stretch to call a religion that made its prophet king of Arabia an ideology, but you DON'T think it's a stretch to say it's somehow like an ethnicity.\n\n\n\nMuslims had a 'Golden Age' because they conquered incredibly wealthy regions and parasitised off the non-Muslims there. Naturally they squandered this opportunity and their civilisation stagnated, because Islamic legal systems and society are inherently inferior.", "680" ], [ "> The Golden Age of Islam lasted HALF A FUCKING MILLENNIUM\n\nI'm supposed to be impressed by a mediaeval civilisation that failed to progress past that point, leaving it to Europe to create the modern world? I don't know why you're so impressed by their 'golden age', which is largely a propaganda fiction.\n\n > I've never said it is.\n\nThen why did you write all that rubbish about blacks? Not only is Islam not a race, there is no similarity between judging a religion and judging an ethnicity. That was the worst attempt at an analogy I've ever seen.\n\nWere you seriously trying to imply that different religions aren't fundamentally different? That they don't impact society and the legal system, and therefore assist or hinder the progress of civilisation in many different ways?\n\n\n\nI don't see why the black idea matters. If blacks were racially stupid and incompetent, or even had racially superior intelligence, why would that have any relevance to a discussion of a religion? Am I supposed to be SO SCARED of being racist that I even allow it to change my views on discussing things which aren't races? That would be stupid and crazy.\n\nIt sounds like you see a world where all religions are basically the same, and where there weren't any ideologies until the Enlightenment era. I feel sorry for you. It must be so boring.\n\n > The word itself was only coined in 1796, and the concept was born out of the French Revolution. \n\nDo you think a word can only be used to describe things that occur after the word's invention?\n\nSo I guess there was never an IDEOLOGICAL feeling among many Romans that monarchy was bad, and the Republic better? That can't have been an ideology, because ideology was only invented in the 18th century. It must have been something else.\n\nWhen the ancient Greeks compared their forms of government to the despotism of the Persians, that can't have been an ideology, that must have been something else. Because for a Greek or anyone else to have an ideology, they have to first wait for the word to be invented in 1796.\n\nI guess when <PERSON> preached that Islam should be the dominant religion, that wasn't an ideology. He could make himself a powerful ruler, conquer Arabia, he can create an entire religion and have his sayings later turned into a full legal system. But no, making a political ideology is beyond him, because political ideology was only invented in 1796.\n\nWhen the Pope and the Emperor clashed over whether the Pope's endorsement was necessary for a new monarch - that can't have been a pair of competing political ideologies. Because people only learned to have ideas of that type after 1796.\n\nWhen the Tondrakians opposed feudalism, and like similar heresies supported equality of the sexes, that wasn't a political ideology, it was... well what exactly? It can't have been an ideology, because this was the middle ages. You're not allowed to have an ideology until a European coins the term in the late 18th century.\n\nWhen the Chinese had all their funny little schisms between the Legalists, the Mohists, the Confucians and whatever else - I don't remember the details. That can't possibly have been an ideological conflict. None of those factions can possibly have represented a political ideology, because you need to wait for a bunch of proto-communist shamelessly regicidal Frogs to guillotine each other before you can make a political ideology.", "680" ], [ "> I think you'll find that this idea of yours that Islam is an ideology didn't pop up until very recently.\n\nNot at all. I'm also not American, and it's not the USA which has a terrible Muslim problem, but rather west Europe. So the Consititution isn't that important really. Admittedly, it's useful for the 'muh constitution' arguments about the muslim ban. But if I thought that Islam was only a religion, it wouldn't be so necessary to ban them. It's because of its wider political ambition that it's such a problem.\n\nIslam was our enemy for millenia before communism.", "293" ], [ "> Aight, let's see your sources, then.\n\nEdit: I mgiht find a source, since my answer is pretty cheap otherwise. So, wikipedia's entry on <PERSON> seems comprehensive. It should suffice. Kinda rude of me to recommend a vast article like that but whatever.\n\nThe problem is, though - you have a pre-conceived notion that religion aren't fundamentally different, that one religion or another won't lead to different historical or social outcomes. So I don't know if any actual knowledge will matter to you more than that preconceived idea.\n\n\nIf you don't know facts about Islamic history, why are you expressing opinions in the first place - I supposed because you think all religions aren't fundamentally different, therefore the details don't matter to you. These are fairly basic facts about Islam or <PERSON>; It's common knowledge, why should I provide a specific source? He made himself ruler as part of his prophethood, he conquered Arabia making it Islamic in the process, made himself a Lawgiver, and laws since then in the Muslim world were mainly based on the fiqhs and ulama, for whom religious scholarship and legal understanding had a huge overlap in their study of and interpretation of the hadith.\n\nChristianity doesn't have equivalents for sharia, we don't have fatwas drawn from hadith, or for <PERSON> or <PERSON> being Emperors or conquerors.\n\nIt's because of Islam's much more direct ambitions in politics and the legal system that it's appropriate to call it a political ideology.", "447" ], [ "> The Constitution specifically states that non-Muslims are not required to take part in religious wars started by the Muslims.\n\nCan you imagine <PERSON> making himself a political leader and reassuring people they won't have to take part in his 'religious wars'? If you can, you nothing of him. This is a proof of <PERSON>'s political ambition, and of how he united militarism and religion in a way that several other prophets would never have done.\n\n > This was three years before his death in 632. It is important to note that the conquest of Mecca was remarkably peaceful. \n\nWhat the wiki maybe doesn't tell you, is that he demolished the pagan centre of worship, destroying the statues just like the Taliban destroyed the Buddhas of Bamiyan. That there weren't many casualties is a testament to his strategic/diplomatic genius, he was still a militaristic religious supremacist.\n\n > Crusades\n\nCrusades are a later invention. They aren't part of Christianity. In your very next paragraph you're asking for specific Koranic passages, but you must surely know that neither 'Crusade' nor anything like it occurs in the New Testament. What hypocrisy.\n\n > Islamic social changes in areas such as social security, family structure, slavery and the rights of women and children improved on the status quo of Arab society\n\nCompare <PERSON>'s pre-Islam wife, a woman older than him who employed him, to the multiple wives and concubines he had afterwards. It should be downright obvious that Islam, even if it made some improvements, was downright bad for women, with restrictions on their movement, treating their testimony as half that of a man's, giving them half the inheritance rights etc.\n\n > Specific verses from the Quran that make Islam resemble an ideology. I don't want what <PERSON> did. I want what <PERSON> wrote down in the Quran.\n\nAs far as I know, all the records we have for <PERSON>'s life come from*hadith*, which are holy Islamic scripture. Not as trusted or holy as the Koran itself, but still an integral part of the religion. Islam also states that <PERSON> is an exemplar to be imitated.\n\n > Christianity doesn't have equivalents for sharia, we don't have fatwas drawn from hadith\n\nI really mean this. It's very easy to find material for creating a full legal system from the koran and hadith. \n\nIslam has sharia, Judaism has halacha, Christianity doesn't have an equivalent to these. The closest thing is canon law but even that's only intended for the catholic church to administrate itself, not for the whole community. And even halacha has much more room for rabbinic discretion and innovation.\n\nCalling the Pope a 'secular ruler' of the Vatican is a big stretch considering the Vatican is a religious institution.\n\nEdit: for some actual Koranic verses, you can look at, say, Sura 8. The amount that it's talking about battles and treaties and war loot and fighting unbelievers is very political. Particularly 8:41 should give you pause for thought - what can sound more suspicious than a religious leader claiming the right to distribute 20% of the loot taken from disbelievers?\n\nEdit: I didn't want to go all out with the koran verses, so I shan't but there's certainly a lot of Islamophobes' favourites out there about fighting unbelievers.", "447" ], [ "> Fucking lol. How dense is it possible to get? Do you honestly have no idea how much sway the Church had over politics in Medieval Europe?\n\nThey would never have been able to, say, ban the printing press. I'm glad our church didn't have even more influence than they did.\n\nWhenever I say there's something negative about Islam, you require a specific Koranic verse (there's also hadith). But for a positive thing about Islam or a negative thing about Christianity, you're okay with bringing up things with no scriptural basis like the Crusades, or ''Many muslim countries today ban polygamy''. What hypocrisy. And the one time you found a specific verse from the New Testament, you said it was a general proscription; but that head-covering was only a requirement for religious services, from what I just read.\n\n > The Bible is very clear that women shouldn't be rulers. As is Islam. Not much difference there.\n\nFortunately, we in the West didn't have our whole culture dominated by the faith to the same extent as Islam. That is because Christianity didn't aspire to contain a complete legal system, nor did the original scripture have too much to say about political organisation - imagine if <PERSON> had set himself up as a political leader, and stated that his successors should unite religious and political authority, like <PERSON> and the <PERSON>. I think our civilisation would have turned out much different, although the concept of a single ruler would have been less damaging in Europe because uniting Europe would be impossible thanks to us being much more finely divided by geography and language than most areas.\n\n > In that respect, there's little difference between Christianity and Islam.\n\nNot at all. When believers are persecuted, Christianity teaches that you should preach anyway and if you get killed (which is what I meant by persecuted, my bad) you are a martyr. Islam teaches you should protect yourself by remaining silent, but you become a martyr on the field of battle. The Islamic definition is clearly militaristic.\n\nAs regards suicide bombing, I do think they are heretical. But I can see the argument that since such bombings are an effective military tactic, it's not so different from dying in a more normal way on the battlefield. I think it reflects badly on Islam that it only takes one heretical view and you get suicide bombing. It would take many heresies to have a Chrstian suicide bombing.\n\n\n > As for all religions being fundamentally different from all other religions, that's pretty handy when it comes to religious freedom.\n\nYes, it is. But I'm too right-wing to value that principle much in the first place, and I don't hold the views on Islam I do *in order* to argue they should be banned, but vice versa.\n\nIslam is a choice, it's people choosing to follow a way of life. (Or at least it would be if not for the whole executing apostates thing, which is another example of Islam being more hungry for real-world power). That's not the same as an ethnicity, which is not some chosen. \n\n > With that said, however, the vast majority of Muslims are non-white. While I wouldn't make the argument myself, it's not too much of a stretch to assume that someone who fears Muslims actually fears black people and brown people.\n\nCan you imagine how disgusted they feel about the white Muslims? So even for a racists I don't think it's a racial thing.\n\nAnd yes, peace and prosperity, but without technological progress is downright disturbing. In the end, there was more worth in the wartorn existence of small classical Athens than there was in the life of the Roman Empire.", "680" ], [ "> I'll buy he wasn't really Islamic, just someone with a mental issue.\n\nThat's something of a false dichotomy. Loads of terrorists are mentally ill as you would expect, that doesn't mean their views and opinions don't exist. The <PERSON> was certainly a primitivist, <PERSON> was certainly an Islamophobe, even though they were also mentally ill.\n\nIt is interesting though, how several of these terrorist muslims are very unobservant muslims. Like that gay nightclub slaughterer was himself a poofter IIRC. So maybe self-hatred is what bridges the gap between mental illness and their 'pious' ideology.", "293" ], [ "My name is not important. What is important is what I'm going to do... I just fuckin' hate this game. And the cosmetics buying shitters feasting on its carcass. My whole life is just cold, bitter hatred. And I always wanted to grief violently. This is the time of vengeance and no MMR is worth saving. And I will put in the trench as many as I can. It's time for me to troll. And it's time for me to feed. My matchmaking genocide begins here. <PERSON>\n\nSeriously every time I see someone whining on reddit about toxicity, and how they wish the game was a hugbox, I end up griefing a game a few days later", "439" ], [ "Can't report the enemy acc buyer who literally feeds every game.\n\nCan't report enemy smurf who picks <PERSON> and gets team to pick ogre <PERSON> to buff him \n\nCan't report enemy who constantly whines in all chat, whose team asks for him to be reported\n\nThis sucks. And so does being unable to report/commend during a game. Stop the handholding please.", "439" ], [ "Account buying is worse, and more deserving of LP, than intentional feeding. An intentional feeder might choose to not feed next game, whereas an account buyer feeds every game because he is a delusional dunning-kruger shitter. Delusional feeding is worse than intentional feeding.\n\nNo wonder you're in favour of hand-holding when you apparently can't think about stuff that Valve didn't suggest as a category for you.\n\n > there's literally no reason you should be able to report enemies\n\nHow about account buying, smurfing, and being a whiny fag that pissed his whole team off? Those are excellent reasons.\n\n > I don't care if they're walking down mid\n\nYou don't care if they ruin the game? Then why even have an opinion on LP if you don't care about game ruiners for arbitrary reasons.\n\n > That's for their teammates to report. \n\nSource: your ass.", "439" ], [ "These terrorists come from within a large and growing civilian population, whose Islamists symathies are significant. Significant enough to wear a quite tightly applied hijab in the middle of one of the world most cosmopoitan cities. \n\nThose foul rags belong in the desert. Unfortunately, banning the hijab might simply be conspiring with the muslim men to keep the women segregated and unassimilated. But we should certainly ban the burkha outright.\n\nI also think we need to find a system to go through the entire Islamic population, using a massive spying apparatus say, detect the Islamists, revoke their citizenship and deport them. Unfortunately that goes against the normal British way of doing things so I guess we just have to wait while an Islamist 5th column burgeons. \n\nCertainly, the terrorist this time around was obviously a traitor, he'd made it clear for years that he was a traitor. Why shouldn't we have a system in which obvious traitors are deported?\n\nIslamism should be treated as treason, because that's what it is.", "972" ], [ "I stopped playing when I reached the battle while the resonance chamber is charging. \n\nWhen I saw the chamber float in, <PERSON> become <PERSON>, the <PERSON> become the First, and the Sorrow appear, it was obvious that they'd run out of money and botched the ending.\n\nI'm definitely not going to bother finishing the game for ages if they didn't even write a good explanation for the Sorrow.", "190" ], [ "Main quest to repair the resonance chamber for most of the game, but in the end it just floats in after half an hour with <PERSON>, who was probably still covered in black Bloom-bile, and doesn't even need those big 5 injectors it had back in the Dome.\n\nConsidering the little plot point where you can accidentally leak the resonance chamber's location to the Memovira, and some of her guards turn up in the Reef, they were clearly planning on having us return there imo. Maybe with the Sorrow and Changing God loyalists in pursuit. Shame they didn't have the resources to make a proper final chapter.", "719" ], [ "Honestly, most of those attitudes deserve a satirical meme of their own. I don't feel an obligation to acknowledge such flimsy proposals. Your liberal friends endorsed a victimological Islamist view of history and current events. They might as well be reading out the Koranic verses that portray non-Muslims as hostile and as causing Islamist reaction.\n\nSimilarly, I don't think the left is being disingenuous to use the equivalent meme to say that the right doesn't support substantive policies to limit gun attacks. Isn't it true that the right doesn't support any new, direct and substantial policy to limit gun attacks? The right cares more about gun rights than it cares about gun attacks. \n\nIsn't it true that the left cares more about multiculturalism and immigration than it does about assimilation or security? To such an extent, they even claim that more immigration and more multiculturalism will lead to security and assimilation. A very *convenient* narrative which amounts to dodging the issue.", "965" ], [ "> Not letting people in doesn't stop this from happening.\n\nActually, it's precisely because of the USA's relatively good immigration policies that its Muslims are relatively less criminal than the core citizenry. Something that is certainly not true of basket cases like Sweden and France's Muslim colonists. And kicking people out - how exactly are they going to make an attack if they're not even in the country?\n\n > Perhaps - do you have stats to back it up?\n\nYes, within the USA they're about even with the far-right, I believe. But then you realise they only have like 1-2% of the population to draw on and are still keeping up....\n\nI don't find the shimmy over to talk about relatively mundane crimes particularly helpful. I think the topic here was Islamism and terrorism, not crime in general.", "690" ], [ "What exactly do you mean by 'victim of violence'? Far from oppressing them, we were a non-Islamist administration, which is the best type of government you can usually get in that region. I don't think the post-colonial regimes have been an improvement at all. Suppressing rebellions violently is something basically everyone in history has done, including their holy prophet.\n\n > They reject the importance of cultural assimilation itself.\n\nSee, my main policy for stopping terrorism would be to completely destroy the Islamist communities in Britain or whichever other country. Part of that would involve allowing them participate in secular society. However, a lot of it would be coercive: deporting Islamists, banning more muslim immigrants, banning the burkha, banning cousin marriage. It's because of the left's assimilation policy, which either doesn't exist at all or is totally limp-wristed, that I think the mockery in OP's image is justified. I mean if your policy is 'be nice to them and hope they stop being religious fundamentalists out of the goodness of their hearts', then you're not really proposing anything.", "579" ], [ "> I mean that since around 1920, the US and Europe have basically been constantly engaged in some form of military action in the region. Over the last 100 years, the US and Europe have started or been involved in conflicts that have killed literally millions of people in the region. \n\nAre we talking about the colonial era here, or other stuff like Iraq/Afghan intervention which was not the same sort of thing. There would have been wars in any possible history, and the Muslims started several such as their foolish attacks on Israel.\n\n > For liberals, what kind of government it is, is immaterial. People have the right to chose their own governments, and outsiders have no right to impose a government on them.\n\nLiberals think it's fine for the EU to replace democracy, and for outsiders to immigrate and swing elections to the left.\n\n<PERSON>, was he even a Christian? Neo-Nazism is much more a pagan thing if you ask me.\n\nI don't agree about the causes of radicalisation. Blaming non-muslim society for an Islamic problem that's an issue in most Muslim countries seems very wrong if you ask me. Aren't the most secular Islamic communities in former USSR countries? Perhaps we should take that sort of attitude.", "680" ], [ "> Are you advocating for white nationalism? \n\nWhat? I'm saying that someone with obviously brown skin is not 'ethnically British'. Calling a literal black person 'ethnically British' is the most retarded thing I've seen for weeks.\n\n > Or to outlaw a religion, in direct violation of our Constitution?\n\nNo, to outlaw Islamism. And.... do you think Britain uses your Constitution or something?\n\nI can see that your reading comprehension is very low and you are not thinking clearly. Take a deep breath and try to read next time.", "579" ], [ "Muslim terrorists draw their inspiration from a foreign ideology, and are thus never homegrown.\n\nIslamism is a political ideology, not just a religion; I don't see how Islamism is protected under freedom of speech, because freedom of speech doesn't defend incitement to violence. And I don't see how the Constitution says anything about immigration laws; it's freedom for the citizens, not freedom to immigrate.\n\nIslam is a foreign, hostile ideology, that should never have been allowed in civilised countries. Muslims by definition reject America's principles, if they are devout at least, so I don't know why you think that's a good argument to bring up.\n\nMoreover, we are having this discussion in the context of a British terror attack. It's not always about the US.", "293" ], [ "In order to make use of Doom's +80 gold from Devour talent, you have to:\n\n-Get level 10 reasonably fast\n\n-not feed for a significant time after getting it. Dying massively disrupts this talent's efficacy. \n\n-not get screwed over by leveling Devour multiple times when you could have maxed your two skills that actually *do* things\n\nIt is not reliable or practical imo.", "163" ], [ "For me the dumbing down was mainly adding easy sustain and easy durability.\n\nGlimmer feels like an incredibly cheap/gimmicky item and after a period of abusing it I actually can't stomach buying it any more.\n\nRaindrops are too easy, they are guaranteed hp and mana sustain and sometimes they also save your life. Like Glimmer, it feels like a cheap get out of jail free card.\n\nThere's also windlace, which was another terribly convenient item. Instead of the old boots versus no boots dichotomy, we have two cheaper items that give less movespeed (boots were cheapened and their speed reduced).\n\nArguably raindrops glimmer and windlace are no longer cancer because they were all nerfed repeatedly, but I still resent them even as I abuse the latter two.\n\nBetween raindrops, mangoes, and *especially* the +50 base mana increase it's now way too easy to have mana sustain. I could add the clarity cancellation change to this complaint but I agreed with that one because I feel an extreme hatred for the 800 aggro radius of ranged creeps. On the other hand, IIRC basi mana regen was slightly decreased so that's nice.\n\nAnd that's before even mentioning shrines.\n\nAlso there was a period of making support's lives way too easy, with what felt like free gold and xp lying around everywhere due to a variety of reasons including the 4 bounties, but also going back to aoe gold/xp and glimmer/raindrops keeping them alive in fights, along with overemphasised income from kills rather than creeps. However the 'free gold/xp' syndrome was fixed by 7.03 imo.", "656" ], [ "The states in the Sahara are weak and backward, so their opinion doesn't matter. Also, they are backward and Islamic so adding more muslim barbarians makes no difference.\n\nThe Constitution, well firstly I was more thinking about Britain and European countries where the Muslims are more numerous and lower quality. And secondly I don't want to deport muslims in general, but specifically those who are detected as being Islamists. This guy in London was a known serial criminal and Islamist traitor.\n\nWhy the hell do I keep getting replies from people who think I said 'deport muslims' when I said 'deport Islamists' 'deport the serious Islamists'?\n\nI do think there should be a carrot side to assimilation where we are actually nice to Muslims and give them opportunities to participate in society. That's why I don't think we should ban the hijab - we might be conspiring to keep muslim women from integrating. But we should also forbid excessive Islamist displays like the burkha. I'd be fine with it if the police, on seeing a muslim man with a stereotypical Islamist beard, had the right to take him into the station and shave it off.", "972" ], [ "> Then I do think it's odd that Islam really only became 'bad' after\n\nIt was always bad, right from the moment <PERSON> started preaching.\n\n > the argument that Muslims are bad because they're Muslims is pretty much exactly the same as the argument that black people are bad because they're black\n\nIt simply isn't\n\nI can't even argue in detail with you here, you are stating a flatly incorrect view of history, and somehow equating an imperial, supremacist political religion with a race (?!). Islam is an ideology not an ethnicity.", "293" ], [ "How is anyone supposed to be impressed by Muslims getting wealthy when they conquer one of the wealthiest regions on the planet at the time? Similarly with the science, if they hadn't done something from that position it would have been really, really bad. The Muta'zilis were crushed by the conservatives in the end, so I don't find it impressive. A lot of the science was done by religious minorities. As the centuries passed, the religious minorities were slowly exterminated and the scientific progress stalled. Perhaps that's just a coincidence.\n\nA lot of the relative 'tolerance' of Muslims is because they came in as a conquering military elite, meaning they were initially only a tiny fraction of the whole population in many cases. They were not always in any position to persecute the overwhelming majority, until more of the people were muslim. Muslims are tolerant when they're a minority. \n\nThe Ottoman Empire was 'multicultural'? THey stole the Hagia Sophia and turned it into a mosque. They made non-Muslims second class-citizens and even stole their children to indoctrinate them as Janssaries on occasion. Such diversity and tolerance. They then banned their muslim citizens from using the printing press, at the behest of the islamic priestly establishment. So progressive!\n\nBy 'always bad' - here's an example. <PERSON>, <PERSON> had a wife who was older than him and employed him as a caravan administrator of some kind. After Islam, <PERSON> had 4 wives, one of which was disturbingly young, a whole bunch of concubines, and instead of participating in trade caravans he sent out raiders to destroy and capture them. You know that a 'holy' text is trash when the 'prophet' literally talks about what portion of the loot he gets to personally distribute from the stolen goods of an infidel trade caravan (koran 8:41). Even the pre-literate society of pagan Arabia was far better than Islam.\n\n > See, most, if not all of the reasons why Muslims are generally 'bad' are more accurately attributed to poverty, lack of education, backwardness, fear (yes, fear), and of course religious extremity, not to them being Muslims. \n\nSurely you must have expected me to not share that opinion. That's YOUR view, mine is much more about Islamic principles, morality and civilisation being inferior to ours. How else can you possibly explain that their civilisation stagnated at precisely a time when the Ottoman Empire held a measure of military superiority over us, and we were being raided and enslaved by the Crimean Khanate and the Barbary Pirates? Islam is backward in itself, because of its contemptible attitudes to women and secular lawmaking. among other things.\n\nWe only gained control over the Middle East when those countries had already become laughably backward compared to us.\n\nActually, a lot of the issues with blacks at least in the USA is also their culture, so maybe it is similar. But neither argument rests on race.\n\nIslam is an ideology. If you don't think it is then you know very little of it. <PERSON> conquered Arabia, destroyed the pagan statues of Mecca, and set his successors on the past to massive conquests, because his religion is also an ideology.", "680" ], [ "<PERSON> is definitely one of my favourites. I don't pay attention to names and genres too much. But I was in a cathedral choir in Britain and so I do remember a few names like <PERSON>. Actually, very few names, it's been ages....\n\nMost stuff before 1900 AD is pretty darn good in my eyes. From there it starts to degenerate massively. I like <PERSON>, but all that discordance was a sign of things to come sadly. Also true of a few other things like architecture. if you compare a 12th century cathedral to any modern architecture, you realise that while technology has progressed, many other things have not.\n\n_URL_0_\n\nCompare the noble sentiments of this music, to modern pop music.... I feel such an absolute hatred for the degenerate trash of modern music it makes me wish the Third Reich had won, for no reason other than because they would have regulated music. Obviously that sentiment fades as soon as I escape from whatever environment has the music I so hate playing.\n\nClassical religious music speaks to a divinely ordered universe (I'm atheist, so I don't mean this literally). Pop music..... doesn't. It's more like a pig wallowing in the mud of vice, failure, stupidity and crudity. Instead of a pure, soaring divine architecture, it evokes a morass of doubt, gross sensuality, and ignorance. At best, it is utterly frivolous, as befits a ''civilisation'' that has allowed divorce rates and single motherhood to skyrocket without any concern, and barely even any comment.", "556" ], [ "Ah yes, 'to pimp'. That really promises some lovely transcendent topics and emotions. I opened a random youtube video with those keywords in just now, skipped to a random point and immediately heard the words 'drugs and gangs'. I will give it a try but I don't expect to enjoy this.....\n\nMy opinions seem to change to become more extreme, not less :p", "371" ], [ "Needed a little VPN to see that. I hate it. Can;t get 5 seconds in and he's already swearing gratuitously. 30 seconds in and I have no clue what he's on about, I have an easier time understand sung latin. I made out some words - 'i was going to kill some rappers but they did it themselves, everyone's suicidal'. How is this not simply evil? I'd call it satanic if I wasn't an atheist.\n\nI hate the heavy-handed didactic hypnotic 'beat' underlying so much modern music. It's so lazy and hamfisted.", "337" ], [ "The less civilised side should be subservient to the rightful colonial overlord. Of course Israelis don't just have the legitimacy of the modern colonial power, but also of the original inhabitants. A 'Free' Palestine would not be an interesting or worthy place. The world really isn't missing anything.\n\nEven if you're an antisemite, you should admit that Israel does make a genuinely valuable contribution to the world with its science.", "677" ], [ "> I really don't see how the recent descent into backwardness \n\nBy 1500 they were already beginning to fall behind, if not earlier. Of course this was a gradual process, however.\n\n > Yes, it was. \n\nNo, the Ottoman Empire was not multicultural. You might as well praise apartheid South Africa as 'multicultural' for giving the coloureds and blacks some basic infrastructure and bantustans.\n\n > This is the main reason why the Empire stagnated\n\nLet's just ignore that thank's to <PERSON>'s power-hunger, the judiciary and the priesthood are closely associated in Islam, allowing the ulama to ban the *printing press*. Can you imagine Europe's history where we didn't have strong secular legal systems? Can you imagine if the Vatican had banned Europeans from using the printing Press?\n\n > Now who's toting 'flatly incorrect' history?\n\nYou are, massively. <PERSON> traipsed across the backward failing Ottomans a long time before we actually dismantled it. The stagnation of Middle Eastern countries goes back centuries before we conquered them, in fact it began while they still held a measure of military superiority.\n\n > The Middle East wasn't all that backward at the time, I think you'll find. Nor was it all that backward for quite some time after. It's really only after all the wars and proxy wars waged by other countries (like Russia and the US) that shit went south fast.\n\nEvery single socio-economic indicator will have been shit compared to Europe by like 1700. How can you not understand that we were only able to trapise over their lands so easily because their whole society was centuries behind us in the first place?\n\n > poverty, fear, lack of education, and backwardness\n\nThose things are caused by inferior cultures such as Islam. Those things are the *definition* of failure, they cannot also be the *causes* of failure. Leftists like you have to pretend that they're caused..... by themselves, because for the sake of your precious equality you have to deny reality and pretend all cultures are equal. Of course you're massive hypocrites, you'll praise Islam for its supposed 'successes' but deny any responsibility for its failures. And you'll claim Western superiority is just because it conquered the other regions, while slandering its mediaeval past.\n\n > things like poverty, fear, lack of education, and backwardness do not depend on religion.\n\nWrong. Islam caused the stagnation of Muslim countries.\n\n > However, you define culture, at least you realise that arguing that Muslims are bad because they're Muslims is like arguing hat black people are bad because they're black\n\nNo, because 'black' is not an ideology. How do you manage to have opinions while being so dumb?\n\n > Islam is a religion. Islamism is an ideology. I wasn't aware this was a point of debate. It's perfectly possible to be a Muslim without wanting all government decisions to be made strictly according to a fundamentalist interpretation of the Qur'an, but if you do then you're an Islamist.\n\nIslam is an ideology. it served as one when <PERSON> used it to conquer Arabia. How much land do you have to conquer for it to count as a political ideology? The Muslims who aren't Islamists are precisely the less pious ones who put real-world, pragmatic or modern values above their religion.\n\n > Unless you also define Christianity as an ideology\n\nChristianity doesn't have a legal system, nor does it have a desire for political domination. Islam does have those things, because *different religions are not the same*. Unfortunately your ideology requires you to pretend that different religions are the same. You're not actually interested in looking at the details of history or religion, you just want to blame the failures of the bad civilisations on the success of the good ones, so that your relativist lie can stay unmolested.", "680" ], [ "Even though the US is a democracy I do not believe the ordinary citizenry are responsible for the crazy foreign policy of their government. \n\nNow, if you proposed housing these refugees in the mansions of the (neocon/liberal) political elite, then I would support that for sure!\n\nEdit: and of course, failing that, a government should prioritise its citizens before non-citizens. To let in refugees would be to compound one error with another. Maintaining order and civilisation where it already exists is more important than trying to save or redeem the whole world.", "678" ], [ "No shared christian heritage? No memories of latin or greek culture from the classical era? No shared European customs and attitudes going way back to the mediaeval era?\n\nThere's a huge number of greek and latin loan-words and derivations. <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, to think of just one. Spanish and Brazilian are among the languages that owe most to latin.\n\nIf you are unaware of those things, it's not because there is no shared culture.", "172" ], [ "Even a secular culture can implicitly contain vast amounts of moral bias from previous religiosity. The jedi-sith divide in Star Wars draws quite heavily on Christian attitudes. If instead of being made by a post-Christian society, that franchise had been made by a post-Muslim society, then the stereotypical behaviours exhibited by jedi and sith respectively would be somewhat different. I cannot predict in any detail how it would have turned out, because I don't watch Arab or Turkish soap operas or films. But I guess jedi would be written as much more accepting of (righteous) anger as natural and good, and the sith proclivity for backbiting and internecine scheming emphasised even more.\n\n > I'm trying to understand how, for example, marrying a non-white person would destroy my 'cultural heritage'.\n\nIt depends, I guess if they're also from the same Latin American country then it won't make a difference. But that's just my view and I don't place the same emphasis on race as many here do. Are you sure there aren't cultural differences between ethnic groups in Latin America? Perhaps not always, but I assume there are in some cases.\n\nA huge amount of implicit biases and ways of seeing things are part of culture and some have persisted for an extremely long time unnoticed; even stretching back to the classical era and <PERSON>. If a priest with a classical education is influenced by classical literature in the 1900s, and influences some of those in his parish with a few witty aphorisms, and those people pass on similar conclusions to their children, then a thin thread of culture certainly exists there.\n\nYou must have *some* culture, some predispositions in how you see the world. No-one is totally independent-minded.", "680" ], [ "At the very least, you should understand that religions teach different things, even if you're not the type to say 'this religion is good and this one is bad'. They still lead to different results. I am an atheist if it is relevant, although politically I might as well be a fundamentalist christian.\n\nAs an example, even going back to the mediaeval era Christian and Muslim countries have had a distinction in their legal systems. Christianity doesn't posit the union of political and religious authority; Islam does. The Pope is not viewed as a great Emperor or General. A Caliph however, is like Pope Emperor and General combined in one man. The religious courts often held much influence in Europe, and often priests would also be legal experts. But they were still two different things, just with plenty of overlap. But in the Muslim world the legal community WERE a type of priest and laws were based on the qu'ran and hadith. Christianity is too vague to build a full-blown legal system on which isn't true of Islam. This goes back to the example of <PERSON>, who made himself a real-world ruler and conquerer, making laws and sending our raiding parties and armies, and demanding tribute. Very different from <PERSON>.\n\n > The only reason human rights have progressed so much in Europe is in spite of religion, not because of it.\n\nThis seems like a very crude view, 50% right at most. Quite often it was the most religiouss who pushed for human rights innovation. People all know about the Spanish Inquisition; but during the Conquest of Mexico the priests urged restraint in the replacement of the pagan religions.", "129" ], [ "> The only reason the conquest of México took part in the first place was because of religion.\n\nAh yes, the famed piety of military adventurers. The *only* reason? What utter rubbish. I guess the conquistadors asked after gold so much because they wanted to emulate the gift of the Magi?\n\n > And European politics were very much religion-based.\n\nIndeed, but there was not the same union of religious and political authority. There doesn't have to be *full* separation of church and state for the difference between the two religions to be stark. You can be opposed to the significent catholic influence on politics, but it has never matched up to its Islamic counterpart of Islamism.", "129" ], [ "> Christians were burning women and scientists at the stake at some point. \n\nWell, that clinches it. We couldn't possibly analyse history or religion to any greater level of detail than this. /s\n\nIslamic conservatives banned the muslims of the Ottoman Empire from using the printing press for three centuries, because the priests and calligraphers had a huge powerbase as the administrators of the legal system.\n\nIf the Catholic church tried anything similar, the reason I am unaware of it is because such attempts were vastly less successful. And the reason for *that* is that Christianity never suggested the same unity of politics and religion that Islam does.", "680" ], [ "No offense meant. I shall lay out my arguments more fully.\n\n<PERSON> wasn't a military or political leader, <PERSON> was. <PERSON> made a famous comment 'render unto <PERSON> what is <PERSON>'s' while the Koran has a verse commenting on how much of the loot from a raid is to be distributed by <PERSON> personally (20%). <PERSON> didn't craft a full legal system or give enough source material, such as hadith, from which to derive one. <PERSON> did. Thus Christendom has always had a far stronger tradition of secular lawmaking. The figure of Pope or Patriarch in Christianity was never considered a rulership like that of <PERSON>. Christians didn't immediately conquer a vast area after their religion was founded, but instead took over the first few states from within. Crusades came centuries after Christianity, but Jihad was invented by <PERSON> himself. The legal system in Christendom was never nearly so dominated by religion or priests as was the legal system in the Islamic world. Today, Islamists are vastly more influential than Catholic political movements were even back a entury or two ago.\n\ngoogle 'islamic schools of jurisprudence' and compare that to the reults for 'christian schools of jurisprudence' or 'christian law'. \n\nIslamic conservative actions such as destroying the Ulugh Beg observatory, or hindering the printing press, easily rival or exceed their Christian counterparts. The only thing I cannot address is the witch-burning phenomenon.", "680" ], [ "> Where Islam is dominant it seems trapped in the 7th century barbarian phase. \n\nI unironically think this is unfair on barbarians, who I think were fairer to women and had a generally secular legal system. Look at <PERSON>'s own pre-Islamic wife <PERSON>, who was older and wealthier than him and who *employed* him. A stark contrast to how he ended up with a dozen concubines from conquest.\n\nActually, I am sure the big coastal cities would be just as nice as Europe, but I could believe things falling off rather as one headed inland.\n\n > I wonder what happened with their contact with Islam that made them fare off worse than Jews or Christians? \n\nI don't really know, but let's compare the Egyptian Christians, who are still 10% of the population, with the Zoroastrian Persians, who are now only 3,000 IIRC. The difference is quite stark. I guess the Egyptian Christians had sympathy from foreign Christian nations, who would request the Muslim ruler to deal mercifully (that would sometimes work). And Egypt was ruled as a colony of Britain for 1882-1950ish. If the Persians had had these great Zoroastrian foreign powers, maybe they'd still be evident in larger numbers. \n\nI am sure there is also a big psychological affect, which would encourage giving up and converting to become a first-class citizen. It is a big morale boost to know that Rome or Constantinople are in the hands of your coreligionists, the Zoroastrians didn't have that - they just had an exile in India, where they were welcome but a minority, and where the Muslims eventually also conquered.\n\nJews are uniquely stubborn, what sort of lunatics (I use the term fondly) recreate a nation after 2,000 years? They are a special case.", "680" ], [ "> You don't think a religion with thousands of years of history will be a little more complexity in terms of denominations than a political ideology that has existed for less than 100 years?\n\nWhen you put it like that, I must concede a little, but I did say I wasn't concerned with stuff like Ahmadiyya, Alawites Ibadi etc, instead looking at the Sunni and Shia mainstream. Also, Islamism is a very clear political force, and even the moderate Muslims regularly make concessions to them. But I think I have switched topic a little from Islam to Muslims, which was careless. And comparing a non-religious political ideology to a religious one is always going to be a little iffy. I did that initially as a troll comment to be fair.\n\n > Muslims don't necessarily want their religion turned into a political ideology\n\nThey are 1400 years too late for that. Islam became a political movement ever since <PERSON> started his rise to power in Medina. He was a strategic genius as it turned out; he ended up as the ruler of most of Arabia, and had a triumphal entry into Mecca at the head of an army. Can you imagine if <PERSON> or <PERSON> had come from obscurity, to become genius military-political leaders comparable to <PERSON> as part of their evangelism? I find it easier to imagine if <PERSON> or <PERSON>, who were also geniuses who united the tribes and set them to conquer foreign lands, had founded religions.\n\nAdmittedly, there are other prophets who mixed prophesy with conquest, such as in the Old Testament. But the Jews seek to conquer a specific homeland that is small, arid and doesn't even have oil, whereas Islam is much more open-ended.\n\n<PERSON>'s immediate successors would complete the conquest of Arabia, defeating many who rebelled (Riddah War) when they saw that the great leader <PERSON> had died, and within 130 years the Caliphs would have defeated the Romans, entirely conquered the Persians, and be fighting border wars with the Franks in the West and the Chinese in the East. At what point does this start to sound political?\n\n > A theocracy is not a new concept and it doesn't always lead to conflict or instability.\n\nThe Caliph in Islam is defined as the military, political and religious leader all at once. By contrast, in ancient Israel the High Priest and the King were not the same: or if we consider the Papacy, it at most held military sway only in central Italy and was not originally *defined* as military or political, although it would become military and political at times. The titles of Pope and Emperor were not mixed, or in Orthodox Byzantium the Patriarch and Emperor were also separate. This is related to one serious issue with Islam which is its strong association of law with religion. Christianity is vague on the issue of law and that's why we have always had a secular element, usually dominant, in our legal system.\n\nI agree about theocracy not necessarily causing instability, in fact quite the reverse! The Ottoman Caliphate banned Muslims from using the printing press for three centuries (courtesy of the legal-priestly elite, the ulama, who were also the calligraphists). That is way too much stability!\n\n > Muslim shouldn't be a catch all term\n\nI think I don't know what we are talking about with 'catch-all term'. Islam and Muslim are pretty clearly defined if you ask me. We are probably always going to talk at cross-purposes on this point.\n\nI am also atheist, but I try to look at religions from a religious person's point of view.", "680" ], [ "For me it's feeling free to play 'support' position 3, or position 6, or retarded stuff like boots first support necro or support Sniper. (4.4k)\n\nIt's not optimal, but I play MUCH better when I'm enjoying myself, trying something new and maybe trolling my team by picking retarded and then spamming all chat flaming the enemy for dying to support Sniper. In contrast you are tryharding and playing A LOT of games. Better to play 2 games in a week and win both than 10 in 3 days and win 5.\n\nI used to like to analyse dota2 but I kinda feel now that it's just a retarded shitshow being turned into League of Legends so that the fat fuck <PERSON> can sell more hats and stuff his face with 50 fucking McChickens, thanks to bounties and shrines everywhere and you should just fight like a bloodthirsty 2k Russian", "558" ], [ "A hoax and a racket, to an extent. Even if it was totally true it would also be a racket, and as for the hoax side of things, the long-term climate is an amazingly recursive complicated system, I do not think we are close to analysing it properly and we should be reacting to climate change on a pragmatic basis instead of creating a socialist world-state or handing MASSIVE tithes to certain corporations which make inefficient (financially) form of energy production.\n\nDunno about Chinese involvement, that sounds CHAINA meme-worthy.\n\n'scientists stuck in ice' is when some researchers got their boat stuck in ice. I believe they were supposed to be looking into shrinking ice caps.", "687" ], [ "- union of secular and religious authority\n\nBoth in the Caliph (Emperor-Pope) and the ulama, which is a priestly-legal class that creates fatwas and enacts sharia. Christianity was always very vague about law - what the hell does ''I have not come to destroy the law but to fulfil it'' even mean? - which is why Christendom's legal systems always had strong secular elements. This is one of the main reasons we advanced while the House of Islam stagnated. Today, sharia courts are still totally widespread, for example in the Muslim colonies in Britain, the mutawiyyah of Saudi, or the senior clerical council of Persia. And if you go to a site like _URL_0_ you will see a vast number of ordinary muslims, many in the west, asking for priestly guidance on matters which are not really related to the divine - or wouldn't be in the eyes of a Christian. Their religion is too all-pervasive and authoritarian. \n\n - attitudes to violence versus humility. \n\nMaybe it's not important to agnostics on a individual level, but Christian emotional biases still pervade every aspect of culture even in the most atheistic countries of the West. The full impact on culture of Christian ideals of humility and forgiveness versus the Islamic ideals of victory, honour/humiliation and superiority cannot even be (easily) analysed because they are so pervasive, fundamental and implicit.\n\nVery random example, but stuff like <PERSON> or <PERSON> sacrificing themselves is heavily drawing on Christianity, perhaps not even consciously. If muslims had made those films I doubt they would have had the same tone at all: in fact I'd be very interested to consider how an Islamic filmmaker would have ended up describing the moral dichotomy between Light Side and Dark Side. \n\nThe moral and emotional tone of the New Testament compared to the Quran, or <PERSON>' actions compared to those of <PERSON>, are extremely stark. You should read about <PERSON>'s life. Then try to imagine what the new Testament would be like if it had a verse that said <PERSON> got to personally distribute 20% of the loot from raids he ordered.\n\n*And know that out of all the booty that ye may acquire (in war), a fifth share is assigned to God,- and to the Apostle, and to near relatives, orphans, the needy, and the wayfarer,- if ye do believe in God and in the revelation We sent down to Our servant on the Day of Testing,- the Day of the meeting of the two forces. For God hath power over all things: Quran 8:41*.\n\n - attitudes to women\n\nTheir rights have always been fewer than in Christendom, or even than the rights they had in pagan Arabia; and polygamy is an abomination. This is probably the most important one, but needs no explanation.\n\nI'm an atheist if it matters.\n\nEdit: Also\n\n > There were other countries such as Malta, Spain, Greece that derived from Middle Eastern and Islamic cultures\n\nThis is an extremely vague argument, if it's even trying to be an argument. Greece has been backward or stagnant for an extremely long time, we should be respectful of their golden age achievements in the classical era, but what's so great about their post-Muslim situation? Nothing really. \n\nAnd the Greeks even got genocided by Turks. MOST of the ancient Greek homelands have been totally cleansed and the Hagia Sophia was used as a mosque for 500 years. Even now it still hasn't been given back to Christians. That leaves your list with Spain, which (while it was indeed influenced culturally) ethically cleansed the Muslims very thoroughly, and Malta, which was the frontier outpost against Muslim powers and the home of a crusading religious order. I'm really not feeling the harmony and multiculturalism right now!\n\nAlso what faggots downvoted the OP, this is an important question we should be willing to answer.", "680" ] ]
451
[ 10593, 15210, 642, 10272, 8273, 23259, 1649, 19178, 13500, 25200, 4430, 14491, 21433, 17349, 18235, 9140, 11755, 9239, 682, 18775, 24060, 20012, 19047, 16237, 4348, 8077, 15540, 7926, 17506, 15478, 19285, 7608, 17200, 22807, 115, 10032, 24658, 742, 25455, 16014, 22542, 20463, 9907, 1239, 14627, 16792, 20649, 5272, 19380, 23523, 23278, 18636, 6499, 6400, 5381, 14004, 922, 9791, 4835, 12561, 16459, 4929, 19649, 6590, 13181, 4353, 20403, 12144, 879, 8962, 227, 2922, 22656, 19998, 10586, 250, 7930, 13177, 16376, 7400, 10519, 24831, 4280, 11422, 23281, 4250, 12096, 19173, 4681, 20872, 10055, 6162, 9161, 10435, 9193, 9530, 16636, 19598, 17790, 23812, 19138, 15313, 16370, 17833, 12442, 414, 20844, 866, 21067, 21717, 999, 593, 20566, 869, 14118, 23101, 612, 10694, 11962, 4377, 2230, 15689, 18728, 10580, 24155, 8815, 3851, 1316, 16629, 7108, 8116, 335, 5554, 12598, 22025, 17054, 13930, 11834, 24497, 5667, 17020, 15171, 19291, 450, 7392, 4347, 3853, 3117, 1909, 13077, 4314, 22801, 21972, 14911, 5914, 9268, 7764, 4141, 11315, 2854, 20791, 25245, 10947, 736, 23172, 20230, 3788, 10815, 16118, 20530, 14782, 6652, 8951, 1920, 16601, 16408, 63, 22117, 4205, 5901, 12132, 7671, 1362, 4700, 12776, 280, 25472, 8364, 2347, 17780, 17523, 19900, 2145, 11280, 24867, 19800, 8897, 24787, 54, 24869, 923, 15614, 582, 1660, 16180, 10399, 9864, 11093, 21090, 3396, 21643, 10196, 24836, 25185, 2135, 16019, 8617, 4162, 4647, 13380, 6702, 231, 8243, 13289, 7054, 14449, 12866, 23758, 3019, 44, 22967, 7975, 13126, 22786, 25202, 346, 23308, 13662, 22528, 3454, 25021, 24533, 8878, 23992, 20288, 5687, 2895, 5394, 22027, 23860, 23710, 2223, 12437, 7436, 10094, 3371, 22198, 1259, 8246, 14985, 22784, 7567, 15046, 10040, 3367, 9737, 1178, 7331, 11191, 18868, 19099, 4721, 18260, 14823, 15882, 16401, 3332, 12477, 7478, 16793, 22619, 23974, 6478, 18716, 20510, 16328, 21953, 13130, 11351, 15085, 23318, 19301, 22795, 13729, 10992, 9551, 15500, 24501, 12251, 15669, 3817, 12159, 18280, 16267, 3905, 4618, 3719, 18852, 15018, 10230, 21832, 1080, 10027, 18641, 1306, 13114, 710, 25505, 14112, 25289, 4105, 17145, 7036, 13921, 23631, 21220, 22089, 13026, 18982, 4460, 7686, 5682, 10455, 13646, 20962, 11022, 7863, 22495, 13998, 4281, 16902, 10881, 3470, 2022, 4762, 20732, 1615, 8386, 8940, 23477, 1949, 15186, 6259, 21394, 327, 17259, 16823, 16910, 11565, 11143, 7758, 8247, 13074, 21245, 3268, 25463, 550, 9104, 14391, 10389, 7970, 21538, 1698, 14111, 2357, 15109, 6221, 18189, 16433, 20556, 17236, 12696, 3363, 19200, 18951, 13431, 23805, 2630, 21148, 22883, 3238, 14955, 24057, 5663, 7104, 22263, 11189, 21069, 12465, 10506, 12612, 10047, 23304, 8110, 4527, 12359, 21529, 4509, 1461, 8580, 22006, 23581, 2690, 25471, 9431, 14415, 8248, 20850, 25094, 1193, 21115, 5054, 2794, 2783, 24169, 24854, 19462, 8543, 15330, 18614, 10022, 4243, 24238, 25201, 6869, 12755, 10226, 7709, 2745, 12448, 10044, 16310, 5578, 13794, 3942, 892, 13129, 17234, 3257, 19220, 20615, 8192, 14038, 2081, 21483, 1451, 15985, 4366, 12660, 5051, 17548, 8755, 7358, 10683, 11590, 11614, 10390, 21048, 10538, 20329, 13613, 19667, 11839, 17199, 14801, 20177, 8058, 15268, 10839, 11508, 21479, 3299, 17993, 7653, 905, 18788, 19186, 12655, 18420, 6070, 10994, 21400, 11984, 22584, 9124, 12585, 1210, 21619, 14707 ]
reddit_dump_-Rozes-
[ [ "People actually think the AIBs would waste all their chip allowance on reference cards? \n\nCheck next week when the aftermarket cards launch and there will be more stock. \n\nIn any case, the demand is currently sky high so of course it will be hard to get a card.\n\nI remember when Vega launched and sold out in minutes too and no one was screaming paper launch.", "816" ], [ "Dude - this was ONLY a reference card launch, and AMD don't make their reference cards. \n\nYou think the AIB partners would waste their chip allowance making reference cards?\n\nWait for the aftermarket card launch next week and you'll see more stock. Wasn't there literally a post on here a few days ago saying exactly that? \n\nAlso, the 3080 released 8 WEEKS AGO and is still out of stock everywhere I look. Don't even try to compare day 1 of AMD to that shambles.", "816" ], [ "Wait did people actually expect stock for AMD's most anticipated launch ever?\n\nI remember VEGA selling out in minutes. This just happens on launch day. \n\nAnd AIB cards haven't even released yet! Do you really think the partners will waste their chip allowance on reference cards? \n\nEvery one of these threads feels like an Nvidia slide thread.", "816" ], [ "> Price and performance are all that matter to the end user. That was not a comment about what caused supply issues and can't be honestly interpreted as such.\n\nThe comment you were replying to was: \n\n > The 3070 is a much higher volume SKU using a much smaller die than either the RTX 3080/90 and RX 6800 line. You know that, right?\n\nAnd you said: \n\n > The 6800 is in the same price bracket ($500-600 vs $580) and had significantly worse availability.\n\nYou brought in a price bracket comparison into a discussion about die size. \n\nDon't talk shit.", "816" ], [ "> Individually, while you could say <PERSON> is maybe equal with Sypical (he isnt), Arsenal & Retals have been far better than Garrettg & Squishy this year\n\nI said this a few weeks ago and got massively downvoted even though it's extremely true. Each player on SSG is better than their NRG counterpart. \n\n > But the universal issue is the complete ignorance, denial, or flat out lack of respect for SAM & OCE. The fact they're not even in the conversation goes to show that barely anyone watches them\n\nDisagree, if you watch them enough you'll know they whiff WAY more than any NA or EU team. They're improving but not enough to be top 15 IMO. \n\n > I do think he's overestimating KCP & Peeps\n\nAgreed - I think teams like OXG, TB, Giants and DIG would play either of those very closely. \n\nI agree with your top 4, but I would have: \n\n1. BDS\n2. SSG\n3. RV\n4. NRG\n5. NV\n6. Giants\n7. TB\n8. G2\n9. KCP\n10. OXG\n11. <PERSON>\n\nThen a bunch of teams very unlikely to place anywhere above top 6 at a hypothetical LAN.", "720" ], [ "I think G2 has such a specific playstyle that once you can counter it consistently, you should always have a decent match against them. I think SSG does, and therefore think teams like Giants and BDS who play a fast counter game would too. \n\nTB is also a counter team so I think they'd also have a strong match against G2. \n\nI also have to give Giants and TB the edge as G2 is consistently unable to break into the top teams in NA when it matters in Regionals and Major, and obviously I think G2 is a terrible LAN team and would suffer in any rating based on a hypothetical LAN. \n\nI guess I would say that my G2 bias puts them 8th but I don't think they're any higher than 6th in the list I gave, you could probably put them above Giants and TB and I wouldn't do more than a small grumble.", "720" ], [ "> <PERSON> has ice in his veins, always get it done\n\nI mean, does he? He hasn't won a LAN without a strong LAN team behind him...\n\n > don’t really need to say anything here, his finals record speaks for itself\n\nYeah absolutely agree <PERSON> is a LAN pro.\n\nAgain - I'm not doubting NRG at all - but describing them as a LAN team is just odd to me.", "820" ], [ "> You're not going to win a LAN without a strong LAN team, unless you depend on a one in a million fluke.\n\nWhat I'm saying is that it's *easier* to be good on LAN when you have a very solid team AND a LAN player on your team. \n\nSaying JSTN \"always gets it done\" on LAN is just false considering it took him 4 seasons to win one.", "558" ], [ "> No he definitely wasn’t. I’m assuming you didn’t watch that whole LAN.\n\nOh I definitely did and Turbo looked easily like their best player for a number of matches, keeping them on the level and keeping their morale up too. \n\n > Anyway winning MVP doesn’t mean anything, especially since he stole it from JSTN, too bad it isn’t his first time taking an underserved MVP.\n\nAh you just seem like a Turbo hater. I seem to remember him actually GIVING <PERSON> his MVP in Season 4.", "791" ], [ "> So youre yelling me that G2 isn't proven on lan when they have had top finishes at every lan\n\nI never said they were unproven, I said they were LAN chokers, only able to make a final before crashing out. \n\n > I'm saying envy are unproven on lan as a squad, with no real results on lan (not their fault) so until we get to see them play on lan, you can't say that they're a stronger lan team because there are no results for them as a team to back it\n\nEnvy are all very good LAN players though, with better results than G2 during the regular season. You can't suddenly say players LOSE their LAN skill just because they're on a new team - and even if you did think this, Envy have already proven they play well as a team. \n\n > I'm saying G2 is stronger solely based on the fact that they are proven, and envy havent had results yet. They could very well be a stronger lan team, but there are 0 results to show it, so its not wrong to say that\n\nSurely making that comparison requires some results to compare to?", "720" ], [ "How is that passive aggressive in any way? You failed to address my point. You're blabbering about only results mattering but you don't have <PERSON> in your top TWENTY players despite his team finishing 1st across the first 3 Regionals? Why would <PERSON>, Chicago, or in fact any of the other 20 players be above him if results were the thing that mattered most?\n\n > If he were good enough, he would carry harder there, is that what you wanted to hear?\n\nHe does already lol. If you genuinely think a single player can carry vs other top teams then you're absolutely deluded and more oblivious than I'd previously thought. \n\nThat list has <PERSON> on. Where did Liquid finish this Regional? Dead last - what about MUH RESULTS?", "600" ], [ "> It’s ridiculous to say that this list is wrong, flat out.\n\nWhy? There's glaring issues with the list. Aztral is objectively better than Kaydop and Retals, Squishy is objectively better than Turbo and Ronaky, and Itachi is also. These aren't opinions. \n\nBasing any list on a team's results and not the player ability is so unbelievably disingenuous it makes my head hurt. \n\nIf you want to go by results, you think Atomic isn't even a top 20 player, despite being on a top 3 team in NA? \n\n > I find it difficult to believe that you actually think there is an objective list of the best players, and that any opinion piece that deviates from it is “incorrect”.\n\nThere's no objective list but there are objective comparisons to make. If my list had <PERSON> above Alpha, would you think that's just an opinion? Like I said, there are some glaring issues on the list, and some are objective, and others are obviously my own opinion, which I didn't think had to be clarified.", "410" ], [ "> <PERSON> played on Barca last split. They finished top 8. (Bet you really thought you had me with this one huh?)\n\nNo, according to you it's only results that matter so you should now instantly rate <PERSON> much much lower than you did last Split. See how the results argument is trash?\n\nThe season before with Aztral, DIG finished 1st in EU. But somehow THAT result isn't enough to carry him into top 10? Get out of here. \n\n > The reason why you dont see <PERSON> on that list is the same reason you dont see squishy or rizzo. They simply didnt do \"as much\" as the other players on their team.\n\nYou think <PERSON> is in the same league as <PERSON> and Atomic? Lol dude. \n\nAnd in that same vein, if Atomic does nothing for Envy, how can Turbo and Mist not be rated top 10 players, despite Envy being a top 3 team?\n\n > <PERSON> has carried teams to LAN wins\n\nWhen was this again? 2017? Is that still relevant?\n\n > Oh and also I was wrong. You arent passive aggressive, youre just aggressive. Im sorry that you favourite player isnt on the top 20 player list of people who analyse rocket league for a living, but sometimes thats the way the cookie crumbles mate.\n\nSo you concede you're talking utter shit and need muh analysts to come and save your opinions? Nice to know.", "549" ], [ "> Jesus christ, who hurt you? Seriously are you okay? How can someone be this aggressive and negative. Please dont completely ignore when other people give you reasonable arguments. Have a nice evening, i dont think any good will come to me from this discussion with you. This is not \"conceding\", i simply dont think its healthy to have a conversation with you right now.\n\nOnce again you bail out actually responding to my points with the typical Reddit \"who hurt you\". \n\nYou've given absolutely zero relevant information, trying to bring up a 2017 LAN win to justify <PERSON> being in the top 20 players but ignoring <PERSON> winning a Regional only a few weeks ago with <PERSON> who's not top 20. It's very sad.", "806" ], [ "> just eyeballing this one it does not match up with what I would make.\n\nThis is literally all I'm trying to say across the entirety of my posts. \n\n > Also, Atomic would make my top 20 I think.\n\nSo you agree the list is wrong. This is what I've been trying to say this whole time. \n\n > Looking at your suggested amendments it seems like you very highly value solo plays and mechanical ability. Clutch out of no where scoring ability from players like <PERSON>, <PERSON>, etc.\n\n[Weird how this sub also rates those players but once their hero analysts say otherwise, then you're a pariah for questioning their list?](_URL_0_)\n\nMost of the top rated comments in that thread have <PERSON> in their top 5 with a bunch of players having Mist in top 5, etc.\n\n > How cool is their car design?\n\nI can't actually tell if you're serious here so well done for a potential \"gotcha\", but you consider a pro's car design when rating a list of best players?\n\n > As for making a list with <PERSON> at the top, be my guest. I love the guy and I root for him whenever he plays but he wouldn’t be on top of my list. **I’d probably ask you why you put him there and even with your reason I likely would not agree**. I don’t really know how you want me to respond to that. \n\nBecause he's objectively not #1. My point is that some comparisons can be made objectively and the list in the OP has some objective errors. \n\nIn any case I can appreciate you at least attempting to argue with my posts and not just downvoting and calling me names so cheers for that.", "410" ], [ "> That's not a strawman when who the best EU player was was clearly disputed, one way or another.\n\nThe argument I'm making was that someone at the very top of EU is somehow only rated 15th a few months later. The strawman you created is a detailed argument about whether Aztral was 1st or 2nd when it's not relevant. \n\n > I haven't watched the video.\n\nYikes. Maybe watch it before trying to argue against all my posts. The entirety of my point is that the list in the OP video is not correct.", "562" ], [ "I accept your analysis but <PERSON> who dragged DIG into EU #1 for all of Season 9 being only 15th does not make sense to me. Everyone who has watched more than a minute of OXG gameplay can see he's still at that level. \n\nI don't understand how people can say it's so heavily based on team results and then ignore the fact that Atomic isn't even top 20, and Turbo is only 20th, despite Envy being FIRST SEED going into the major, based on Regionals performance. If it's not based on Atomic or Turbo, it must be <PERSON> right? But he's only 11th, behind 2 members of NRG despite having equal or better results than them based on the Fall split, and 2 members of RV despite having equal or better results than THEM based on the Fall split. \n\nSuggesting it's based on what people achieved over a YEAR is odd, considering less than a year ago DIG was top of EU with a Regional win under their belt and now the only player left in the list is <PERSON> at 15th? After finishing essentially 3rd at RLCS8 too? \n\nThen <PERSON> being 4th despite being the best player on the best team in NA? After SSG made top 4 at RLCS and 2nd in RLCS9 too? \n\nIt just seems they've mixed up rating people based on team results and personal performance too much, with some people weighted way too heavily on past results and/or team performance. \n\nAnd not a single mention of any OCE or SAM players too, not even a shoutout which is also a bit odd.", "410" ], [ "> stake + zamué > <PERSON> + aztral\n\nNah not even close. The way Chausette and Aztral played yesterday was absolutely insane and they're the only team so far to take a game off BDS. \n\nStake and <PERSON> panic way too often to be reliably consistent at the top tier. \n\nItachi + <PERSON> and Aztral would be an absolutely dominating roster. \n\nBut I still want Itachi to go to RV for Kaydop.", "720" ], [ "He's a good analyst, as all ex-pro players are - which is why he should be on the desk with <PERSON>. He was great during the DH circuit when they had him on the analyst desk full time. \n\nHe can't cast though, especially under pressure. He starts sentences and half the time they never end up making sense, he makes up words, slurs words, etc. \n\nI would just rather him in a position he's good at.", "555" ], [ "> I think there's a bit of a question on how they will handle LAN play and the pressure of playing in front of thousands of people. As all 3 of them never really had that kind of experience before.\n > \n > But I don't think that'll be enough to stop them beyond maybe a few shaky first games.\n\nI mean, if you're really truly honest, apart from <PERSON> and <PERSON>, and possibly Mist, all of the top NA players are huge chokers on LAN.", "63" ], [ "> <PERSON> and <PERSON> are world champions and you can’t say anything about that.\n\nAfter <PERSON> had 7 attempts at it? They only won because <PERSON> dragged them over the line or they would have choked to Vitality again. \n\n > <PERSON>, <PERSON> and chicago went to the finals at worlds as well.\n\nYeah and choked out of winning after destroying everyone else they played that entire weekend. They also made the finals for DH Montreal and choked vs the Peeps. \n\n > I don’t understand what are you trying to say tbh\n\nReally? I thought it was quite clear... Most of the top NA teams have players who've never been as successful on LAN as their domestic performance would indicate.", "720" ], [ "> I've been told this is my \"old man\" tell. I really don't care about any of this RGB shit. I don't want a glowing motherboard and ram and fans. I don't want a case with a tempered glass panel. I want the shit to be silent, cool and not draw attention to itself - That's the monitors job.\n\nI'm in my 30s and think that a well designed look can add to the aesthetics of a room. I don't see any harm in including RGB, especially as you can turn it off. Or in your case, it doesn't even matter because you can't see it. So what's the harm in including it? \n\nIt's just such a poor attempt at gatekeeping it makes me laugh. \"Oh no I'm too MATURE for RGB\". Get out of here.", "989" ], [ "It's not <PERSON> hate, although I dislike him because he's a flakey bullshitter. \n\nIt's acknowledging that a non-negligible amount of his success is because he has has an insane level of support from his teammates allowing him to just spend every game taking perfect shots. \n\n<PERSON> and <PERSON> are literally like ambrosia for someone who wants to be a striker, and <PERSON> is hardly the player to take that striking spotlight. \n\nAlso, it's not an insult against <PERSON> to suggest that he can't score if his current teammates are shit, which is the other half of what these comments imply.", "806" ], [ "> I think Guild were implementing a possession heavy, high pressure playstyle that caused them to reign in their instincts a bit and SNG are happier for their players to solo play a lot more, which will suit <PERSON> well.\n\nI made a comment back at the start of last Split that Guild looked like they were always saying \"no after YOU\" to their teammates and it left some very weird defensive errors where no one would actually go for the ball. Like <PERSON> didn't want to come in and take control and wanted to be polite and not called out as a ball chaser. \n\nSNG are the opposite, they look for passes and say \"take this pass and go with it\". It's so refreshing to see and must be a blast of fresh air for <PERSON> too.", "439" ], [ "> no NA team outside of the top 4 has made a grand final since regional 3 it starts to get a bit old for me\n\nYou mean, the ONLY time was Regional 3. \n\n1 - SSG NRG \n2 - NRG Envy \n3 - Envy KCP \nMajor - NRG SSG\n\nApart from KCP there's only 3 teams to ever make a GF in NA.\n\nAnd I saw you edited to include WSOE: \n\nWSOE - NRG Envy\n\nSame 2 teams.", "720" ], [ "> what do you mean bot playstyle?\n\nWhat does bot playstyle mean to you? They stack the opponents half and spam shots until one goes in. It's not skillful it's boring. Every touch they make is a hard clear or a shot. Rotating through looking for demos and spamming endless shots is so boring to me. Requires no skill, no outplays, just mindless spam.", "411" ], [ "> Wat, aggresive rotations and keeping the pressure on winning challenge after challenge to get shot after shot requires no skill? Come on man you must be trolling now. They're an extremely skillful team and deserve to be top 4, try not to be too biased in your observations.\n\nWinning challenges? No, spamming shots over and over until the opponent runs out of boost is a playstyle I don't like. They don't win challenges, they don't go for challenges, just long clears and boomer balls. \n\nAgain - suggesting I'm trolling because I don't think their playstyle is worth watching is not exactly true.", "558" ], [ "> Nah I'm calling you a troll because you're saying their playstyle requires no skill, which is just blatantly wrong. Dislike their playstyle sure but to say they're not a skillful team and get by on luck is ridiculous\n\nIt requires way less skill than counterattack based teams or defensive based teams absolutely. The most basic technique in all of Rocket League, the thing that even Silvers know how to do, is spam shots. \n\nRacing round taking a shot then looking for a demo is literally plat tier gameplay. \n\nThey're also easily one of the luckiest teams in the entirety of pro Rocket League. Their Grid run last season: \n\n\nWeek 2 SSG stops moving at 0 seconds and hands G2 an overtime in game 4, giving them momentum to come back and win the Grid.\n\nWeek 6 SSG memes around in the Dominus and lets G2 win game 2 and then gain momentum and win the series, going on to win the Grid. \n\nWeek 7 EU suffocates G2 and looks poised to win the series and knock G2 out... only to leave midway through the Bo7 thinking they'd won, and lose all momentum, G2 goes on to win the Grid. \n\nAlso the only team in all of NA to benefit from the game advantage for multiple weeks, with back to back weeks going to \"game 7\" where the series actually ends 3-3. \n\nAND THEN IN WEEK 9:\n\nSSG forfeits, essentially handing G2 the Grid spot.\n\nAND\n\nKCP's best player Beastmode internet goes out so KCP had to play G2 in the lowers with a sub. If G2 lost this game NRG wins the Grid.\n\nName a SINGLE team who has things go more in their favour than G2.", "720" ], [ "> but what would make a better list in your opinion??\n\nThere's loads of errors that could be fixed. \n\nItachi > <PERSON>, Squishy > Turbo, Kaydop is not even top 20 anymore, Aztral needs bumping up like 10 places, Archie and Mist > <PERSON>, Firstkiller > <PERSON>, Atomic not even top 20, JSTN being number 1 etc etc etc\n\n<PERSON> not even getting a notable mention but *RelatingWave* getting one? \n\nThere's loads of errors.", "300" ], [ "> Yes, along with everybody else in this thread, I am unable to comprehend what you are trying to say\n\nA lot of non-native English speakers on this sub\n\n > What are you saying is “laughably incorrect”?\n\nEven this is confusing for you? The list presented in <PERSON>' video is wrong. \n\n > I truly do not understand what your perspective is and every comment of clarification you’ve left has only made it more confusing.\n\nThe point I was making is that <PERSON>, or anyone, should make a counter video explaining how the list presented in the OP video is incorrect. For some reason people have jumped on and tried to inform me that in fact <PERSON> made the list in the OP. \n\nThe fact <PERSON> contributed to the list in the OP has no bearing on whether the list is correct or not. \n\nMy comment was a request to create the video \"This list is wrong and here's why\" because the OP video is wrong. It just so happened to be <PERSON> I was replying to, because he made that comment. \n\nIs this really that confusing?", "337" ] ]
399
[ 10545, 22849, 10298, 5512, 21329, 13302, 8995, 1054, 16212, 4020, 10812, 15482, 10133, 10470, 20626, 16095, 1386, 10040, 1908, 17099, 8110, 8628, 24614, 22034, 1207, 7074, 20512, 13273, 11599, 215, 20767, 20821, 3763, 19602, 23889, 24102, 10967, 18370, 3316, 22811, 11686, 22384, 1726, 24473, 5441, 7025, 13489, 19421, 14250, 14173, 613, 5396, 2634, 24209, 4866, 11494, 6293, 18380, 15655, 6030, 22864, 13526, 6574, 1831, 14665, 16335, 13292, 8114, 13780, 11005, 10269, 18158, 7165, 12003, 22584, 2142, 2172, 25284, 4206, 12802, 16648, 21270, 12967, 9585, 16917, 23165, 12482, 15453, 14693, 20828, 18887, 15663, 14793, 1618, 10509, 25328, 3784, 3857, 19758, 1683, 24331, 4214, 3205, 2377, 9628, 13752, 5913, 12017, 2113, 13936, 2559, 24583, 24023, 8146, 12817, 6775, 14689, 14535, 13037, 11336, 8777, 1343, 3131, 15269, 23029, 5302, 11861, 22944, 17240, 2417, 5791, 8136, 25069, 2049, 1667, 5753, 3191, 9943, 17402, 25266, 20284, 12988, 22296, 9716, 17863, 20740, 3006, 16034, 8749, 13028, 9112, 17501, 8772, 1557, 9009, 9712, 6975, 10568, 17342, 831, 7329, 2370, 411, 13457, 10313, 2760, 15849, 4174, 1452, 6585, 2045, 4375, 3638, 18631, 6472, 24259, 16807, 6377, 22328, 695, 5093, 2117, 1935, 4731, 24109, 11753, 3833, 6984, 7246, 11762, 11760, 23467, 23227, 17720, 24699, 10062, 22627, 9303, 13110, 15712, 14162, 12586, 11805, 12251, 10047, 3159, 5686, 2560, 3911, 8208, 7083, 14816, 18589, 25012, 4779, 10980, 14700, 3156, 12095, 1883, 8403, 20942, 3544, 654, 19419, 11756, 2783, 122, 18923, 13629, 10308, 8367, 21938, 13, 6826, 2129, 2755, 17480, 3988, 4599, 25056, 11965, 14877, 4395, 2691, 14935, 25025, 3805, 16152, 12942, 2329, 23106, 25468, 3172, 8969, 692, 23813, 16657, 3460, 20766, 20375, 21499, 14046, 17784, 24313, 7211, 3125, 10175, 14703, 3368, 2296, 10576, 19894, 14368, 5642, 7964, 15413, 2211, 5940, 2340, 21700, 18461, 18560, 9497, 4535, 13228, 19437, 4970, 21886, 1407, 23123, 8599, 1062, 7188, 6016, 11484, 18459, 10515, 10705, 6219, 24382, 15563, 14763, 1358, 15102, 3292, 6630, 24078, 14118, 13957, 10103, 16403, 7248, 283, 22071, 4783, 7776, 11914, 11838, 14691, 5408, 4560, 1124, 10315, 24197, 5411, 16798, 18705, 11834, 12202, 3616, 2480, 21879, 2, 22509, 14370, 1663, 18291, 12065, 20098, 16988, 10863, 10513, 12018, 24481, 1568, 3193, 3563, 2494, 15954, 1447, 13911, 11263, 7632, 14080, 19316, 24979, 11187, 10885, 25491, 4764, 3906, 14713, 5478, 23353, 20088, 3485, 2932, 19392, 9138, 23774, 18898, 13759, 20520, 1648, 12478, 9082, 150, 15361, 5088, 7347, 2457, 7075, 7400, 4120, 23414, 1479, 18274, 6815, 24406, 20675, 798, 25192, 18414, 2347, 397, 14661, 12264, 13732, 13198, 15349, 5134, 17125, 23086, 9621, 7778, 17604, 11355, 10359, 19516, 2489, 3765, 14282, 25052, 8839, 3162, 13687, 209, 19951, 9389, 1555, 4198, 14682, 7334, 24364, 49, 9509, 4324, 17675, 5620, 11507, 1891, 24332, 345, 15668, 3961, 3413, 18939, 9115, 2404, 22373, 8706, 1279, 3512, 876, 5553, 16862, 6044, 17493, 24702, 5199, 21677, 13650, 13418, 17488, 24144, 8256, 9485, 5343, 1482, 13729, 1313, 4674, 10621, 19661, 4366, 23304, 4882, 4076, 9936, 4813, 20522, 21405, 13122, 25343, 13005, 11554, 11137, 25241, 14806, 4815, 6628, 24276, 472, 25132, 16697, 383, 18251, 3773, 3009, 22270, 2809, 10848, 10151, 830, 3426, 24893, 8514, 6445 ]
reddit_dump_-SA-HatfulOfHollow
[ [ "> The most level headed and reasonable comments are actually coming from the fans who watch Leicester week in, week out, funny that.\n\nHow do you know they are that and not one of these people:\n\n* [/r/videos - Reddit is Being Manipulated by Professional Shills Every Day](_URL_1_)\n* _URL_0_\n\nThey are specifically hiring people with credible profiles who have a credible posting history.\n\nIf Leicester City wanted to run a PR campaign to manipulate opinion about their latest decision on social media, this would be the perfect time.", "423" ], [ "Do you actually really think this is simply going to blow over?\n\nU.S. citizens have just allowed a Kremlin-compromised fascist to take over the White House. The legitimacy of a presidency is not just about electoral votes: constitutional oaths are made and have already been violated. Conspiring with Russians to hack the e-mail server of the Democratic National Committee is highly illegal. Not divesting from business interests violates the Emoluments Clause. Waging war on the First Amendment alone should be enough for impeachment. Being mentally ill in general voids your fitness to serve as commander in chief, and <PERSON> is clearly mentally ill.\n\nThis can't wait to 2020, and the damage will never be undone unless impeachment is undertaken, and right now, with Republican support.\n\nIf not, 2020 the United States might not even exist.\n\nEdit: spelling.", "554" ], [ "Americans: \"OMG let's go vote in the midterms! Democracy for the win!\"\n\nMeanwhile: seditionist puppet, with Kremlin puppet staff so bad the IC community won't say anything sensitive in the Sit Room, runs the White House.\n\nYeah, that can wait till the midterms, when there's going to be some actual useful resistance .. the kind that restores enough power to impeach the clown... yeah right, that will never happen and the Republicans will win again.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n<PERSON>'s favorability trend has been improving *massively* since April. Barely half (50.9%) the country rates <PERSON> \"unfavorable\".\n\nScrew that.", "953" ], [ "Your comment is misleading too. From OP's E.U. anti-disinfo article:\n\n > While RT refers three times to the opinion research as a “Gallup poll”, **Bloomberg is more precise and calls the source of the poll “WIN/Gallup”. It ends the article with the remark: “WIN/Gallup International — which is not related to U.S.-based Gallup Inc.** — polled about 1,000 people in each of 66 countries around the world”.\n\n > **The website of WIN/Gallup carries a disclaimer: “WIN/Gallup International Association or its members are not related to Gallup Inc., headquartered in Washington D.C which is no longer a member of Gallup International Association.** Gallup International Association does not accept responsibility for opinion polling other than its own. We require that our surveys be credited fully as Gallup International (not Gallup or Gallup Poll).”\n\n > **The detail in the name of the polling institution made little difference to RT.** When a polling result can serve to underscore the pro-Kremlin narrative that some nations in Russia’s “near abroad” might actually feel comfortable about Russian protection, why not add some credibility to it?", "629" ], [ "> Yeah, I didn't even click on the article\n\nNo shit. \n\n > Labour is not always on the wrong end of Russian propaganda. The BBC reported on Wednesday that a network of pro-Russian Twitter accounts seemed to be trying to swing the crucial Stoke-on-Trent Central by-election in favour of <PERSON> party. The multiple accounts were first identified by researcher <PERSON> as posting pro-Russia, anti-Ukraine propaganda.", "629" ], [ "The amount of apologia and PR-massaged unity messaging in this thread encouraging Democrats to accept further compromise is astounding. \n\nThey even have the gonads to complain about Russian manipulation and astroturfing, while it is abundantly obvious that what would serve <PERSON> best is a docile, meek opposition which would not aggressively probe impeachable offenses, including Kremlin puppeteering.\n\nWhat would serve <PERSON> best is not having <PERSON> as the leader, but sideline him just enough to be present without being in charge. It's controlled opposition, it's been happening inside the obedient, docile, corporatist and compromise-ridden Democratic party for ages.", "468" ], [ "Not just Twitter, but information warfare across the spectrum, through all channels, social media, tv, websites, etc.. and let's not pretend it has not succeeded to devastating effect across a range of issues, demographics and regions.\n\n > **Is the disinformation campaign successful? Definitely yes.** Just as the purpose of a campaign run by a car brand is not to make the consumer like their advertisement in this or that magazine, but to buy the car, similarly the purpose of a disinformation campaign is not to make consumers like the outlets but to buy the disinformation message as credible information. And many of us are buying. **If we look at those few focused opinion polls measuring how many people accept an obvious disinformation planted in pro-Kremlin media (5), we have to conclude that the disinformation campaign is extremely successful.** It’s incumbent on us all to be more careful what we consume.\n\n > (5) See _URL_3_, and _URL_0_. Similar conclusions to be seen e.g. _URL_1_, _URL_2_, _URL_6_, _URL_4_.\n\nSOURCE: EU Anti-Russian-Propaganda Taskforce - **_URL_5_", "629" ], [ "> You do understand my point many posts ago saying no one here is being arrested for telling the truth? \n\nNo, I don't.\n\n > Here no one is arrested. In Sweden and Denmark they are.\n\nNot true, but even if it were, we were speaking about France, not Sweden and Denmark.\n\n > If you will be arrested for posting facts then there is a 100% chance that the facts will remain obscure\n\nUnderreporting of rape to the police in the United States is just as severe if not worse than in France.\n\nStill not quite sure what you're talking about.\n\nEdit: also, whistleblowers are arrested all the time in the United States.", "878" ], [ "> What is a corporatist?\n\nA politician for sale, a manager without ideology, a pragmatist without humanity, a corrupted kleptocrat who defends big money interests unwaveringly, who acts primarily in the interests of the wealthy upper class, who worries little about externalities and the consequences on the environment of the perpetual growth paradigm, one who is subservient to the interests of captains of industry over the interests of workers.\n\n > Because the real definition is basically \"someone who believes that special interest groups exists and responds to their needs on a group-level basis\".\n\nIt would be handy if you got to redefine \"corporatism\" as something positive and endearing, wouldn't it? Yet that is quite a transparent gambit. What is torture? Perhaps it is enhanced interrogation. What is murder? Perhaps it is a \"disposition matrix\". What is mass surveillance? Perhaps it isn't surveillance, but merely \"collection\". Plenty of such Orwellian redefinitions have been attempted.\n\nI understand that you would probably take this in the \"debate ourselves to death\" direction where all meaning is lost in an endless back-and-forth about semantics.\n\n > She's a politician. Check <PERSON>'s stance on gay rights in the 90s, it wasn't staunchly pro-gay, iirc it was mostly \"ehh sure gay people are fine, but not in New Hampshire, leave it to the states\", which I'll agree was ahead of its time, but is basically a republican stance now.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n > Also again, careful with your words. Having a stance that becomes more progressive over time is not \"flip-flopping\"\n\nRead the source.\n\n > That's again, a good attribute.\n\nOrwellian redinition of bad concepts is never a good attribute. It serves to confuse, obfuscate and muddy the discussion. Flip-flopping means to adopt a position not out of principle, but to pander to the whims of the electorate for political expedience. <PERSON> embodies that sentiment.\n\nI appreciate your attempts to muddy the waters so carefully and shrewdly, it helps to sharpen my pencil.\n\n > You need to appeal to the center.\n\nNo, you actually need to move the Overton Window back to the real center, where leftists aren't constantly shafted by compromising Democrats who exacerbate the extreme politics of the far-right by constantly pandering and catering to them.\n\nThis time calls for appeal to the real base of the Democratic party: the lower-middle class. \n\nThe notion that pandering and spineless principle-abandoning should still be front-and-center in Democrat politics after 8 years of obstructive aggression followed by the election of a far-right, fascist radical is sheer lunacy.\n\nYou are singing the praises of the worst kind of enablers, the kind who keep inching closer to the other side of the isle which is moving farther and farther to the extreme right, losing identity and roots in the process, and selling out the people who are counting on Democrats to be the counterweight to the odious, counterfactual, anti-scientific, radical madness gripping the Republican party and the White House at present.\n\nCompromise and centrism are the worst possible solutions nobody needs right now.", "285" ], [ "> I am always open to having my mind changed. \n\nI am open to trying, unless one look at someone's comment history reveals aggressive gaslighting on behalf of The_Donald.\n\n > Could your reluctance to comment on it be related to there not being any evidence?\n\nCould your rhetorical questions be related to there not being a *genuine* openness to having your mind changed?\n\n > You mention information warfare through all channels which, in theory, would suggest there is compelling evidence for it?\n\nThis entire act of not at all knowing about this evidence is insincere: you know very well what has been going on. \n\nMy question is, why would you so obviously pretend to be blissfully unaware of the escalation of Russian propaganda efforts since the War in Ukraine?\n\nWhat would be the purpose of acting so surprised and unaware? It could only be dishonest rhetorical posturing, could it not?\n\nOne way to break the mould in situations like this has traditionally been to have you outline which news sources you would accept as factual and authoritative, and have you enumerate what you think constitutes \"compelling evidence\".\n\nYou would then respond with endless subterfuge, or you would post hesitant and vague descriptions of sources, amenable to change at your whim, or you would be exceedingly forthright and list Breitbart, Fox News and the Washington Times as some media outlets you trust, revealing the narrowness of sources you would want to impose to minimize the chances of being forced to accept facts and evidence you would find unpalatable for your position.\n\nYou would also invent an artificially unattainable standard of \"compelling\" so as to further dash any hopes of having your \"open\" mind convinced by data, reports and evidence.\n\nPersonally, I find one tactic particularly amusing, and that would be to bombard you with endless sources in foreign languages: media organizations you know very little about yet are very established and reliable in the European nations I would cite them from, and whose nations I understand the language of.\n\nBut what would be the use? As I said: it would be much more productive and efficient for you to immediately list your elaborate dismissals instead and save us both the effort.\n\nEdit: spelling", "977" ], [ "> accusing someone of being unwilling to debate because they asked for some supporting evidence\n\nIf you read my comment, asking for evidence wasn't the reason. Unwillingness to accept any evidence was, as clearly evinced by rabidly Trumpist post history.\n\n > when the article failed to provide any\n\nWe weren't discussing the article, but Russian information warfare in general, about which endless reports and articles have been written. So how could it be relevant how the \"article\", meaning OP's posted link to an article, \"fails to provide any\"?\n\nThese are vexing questions, don't you think?", "977" ], [ "Suppose I assumed good faith on your part as third-party interjector, and I took one simple example to avoid getting bogged down and said \"Ukraine\" and \"MH17\", what would you say?\n\nWould you deny massive Russian propaganda efforts in that department influencing public opinion?\n\nSuppose I cited one link:\n\n_URL_1_\n\nWhat would your response be? \n\nI ask these questions because of the steadfast tactics of obfuscation I am accustomed to: if I post one link, an attempt will be made to discredit that one source, if I post multiple links, they will likely be together discarded as \"Western media who lied to us about Iraq\", if I post a massive collection of links, I am used to hearing: TL;DR or \"copy pasta spam\".\n\nThe reality is, I do have a very large collection of articles on Russian propaganda. \n\nHere is another example, from NATO:\n\n_URL_0_\n\nAre you truly open-minded? \n\nAnother question comes to mind, if you are a frequent contributor to Reddit, an active and longtime user, as you clearly are, could you honestly, cross your heart and hope to die, claim you haven't heard of this before?\n\nWould you elevate the required level of evidence to a point unattainable at present so as to facilitate denial?\n\nPerhaps you are *truly* well-intentioned and all these considerations I previously listed are merely cynical and inappropriate. \n\nPerhaps you will take my skeptical attitude about the alleged openness of minds in this thread as a point of contention, ignore the evidence and grab on to that.\n\nThere are many possibilities, and since 2014, all of it has happened in the Reddit comment section one way or the other. I'm certain you'll understand the sentiment.", "629" ], [ "Of course. I'm saying the same thing you are, but I tried explaining it with copiousness for a change: I've done plenty of curt rejections, I can see it coming from a hundred miles away and so can you.\n\nUnfortunately MH17 couldn't.\n\nYou know the game starts when they start requesting answers they already have ready-made dismissals for, which one could probably find in their post histories if one took the time going through it.\n\nAs for those cyberattacks: with IT experience it's especially amusing seeing the prevarication going around.", "226" ], [ "I do believe that the ideologicals think the end justifies the means, so lying and pathological denial are fair game to them. Losing face about these matters is like losing your core identity. They can't psychologically afford to do so, and they can now maneuver in the Putinist swamp of total rejection of fact: making it easier in present-day society to maintain social peer acceptance while lying your ass off.", "30" ], [ "These aren't random comments: they're all from one thread; and this was the actual thread which may have broke the camel's back, because this is also the thread where <PERSON> started altering comments.\n\nNow, to be clear, I don't really care what issues you think you have with <PERSON>. Just know that we are *absolute* polar opposites of each other and I would like nothing better than to see you and people like you financially ruined and your lives destroyed for the type of behavior you support or condone.\n\n<PERSON>, tolerant man that he is, treated this filth with too much respect. \n\nEdit: also, I don't know if you filthy, atrocious, dog-brained cunts can read the fucking writing on the wall, but clearly, you gotta be able to look at /r/pizzagate and /r/altright and have some tiny remaining mental capacity available for ***learning lessons***.", "837" ], [ "Yeah? Profound! \n\nEven moreso knowing the article says \"Bloomberg\" at the bottom and ... *gasp* is written by these same journalists:\n\n_URL_0_\n\n.. which is a Bloomberg article from yesterday.\n\nAnd what a complete surprise to discover you post in The_Donald and you're projecting the \"fake news\" phenomenon you lot invented on everybody else. \n\nYes, Daddy <PERSON> dictates the news. His list of \"fake news\":\n\nABC, NBC, CNN, the Washington Post, the New York Times, the BBC, the Guardian, CBS, the Huffington Post, the LA Times, the Boston Globe, the Wall Street Journal, Fox News, Des Moines Register, NY Daily News, Reuters, Associated Press, The Daily Beast, Politico, Univision, Time Magazine, Rolling Stone Magazine, the New Yorker...\n\n...but Breitbart is fine, of course. ;-)", "67" ], [ "> Lol did you just send me an <PERSON> quote as a source to why he didn't start ISIS? \n\nYes. It's not as if the pathologically lying, delusional kookloonery from the far-right has any merit: they won't even cite sources to begin with, so all of their idiotic fake news can be dismissed out of hand. They hate that, so they attack news organizations like CNN, the Washington Post, the LA Times, Politico and the New York Times and project their own fakeness on them. \n\n > By pulling out the way he did\n\nBy that logic, you created IS.", "67" ], [ "I argued the issue, you have nothing to bring to the table but crackpot far-right delusion and no sources. I mean, this debate could be settled merely with this:\n\n > Jordanian radical <PERSON> founded Jamāʻat al-Tawḥīd wa-al-Jihād (lit. \"The Organisation of Monotheism and Jihad\") in 1999.^[38] In October 2004, <PERSON> pledged allegiance (bay'ah) to al-Qaeda leader <PERSON> and renamed the group Tanẓīm Qāʻidat al-Jihād fī Bilād al-Rāfidayn (lit. \"The Organisation of Jihad's Base in Mesopotamia\"), commonly known as al-Qaeda in Iraq or AQI. Under <PERSON>, the group participated in the Iraqi insurgency following the March 2003 invasion of Iraq by Western forces. In January 2006, the group joined other Sunni insurgent groups to form the short-lived Mujahideen Shura Council.\n\n > **After <PERSON> was killed in June 2006, the Mujahideen Shura Council merged in October 2006 with several more insurgent factions to establish ad-Dawlah al-ʻIrāq al-Islāmiyah, also known as the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI).**^[182] The ISI was led by <PERSON> and <PERSON>-Masri,^[183] until they were killed in a US–Iraqi operation in April 2010, after which <PERSON> became the group's leader.\n\n > In August 2011, following the outbreak of the Syrian Civil War, ISI, under the leadership of <PERSON>, sent a mission into Syria. Under the name Jabhat an-Nuṣrah li-Ahli ash-Shām (or al-Nusra Front), it established a large presence in Sunni-majority Raqqa, Idlib, Deir ez-Zor, and Aleppo provinces. In April 2013, <PERSON> decreed the reunification of the Syrian al-Nusra Front with ISI to form the \"Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant\" (ISIL). However, <PERSON>-Julani and <PERSON>, the leaders of al-Nusra and al-Qaeda respectively, rejected the merger. After an eight-month power struggle, al-Qaeda cut all ties with ISIL by February 2014, citing its failure to consult and \"notorious intransigence\".^[4][184]\n\n > In early 2014, ISIL drove Iraqi government forces out of key cities in its Anbar campaign,^[49] which was followed by the capture of Mosul^[50] and the Sinjar massacre.^[51] The loss of control almost caused a collapse of the Iraqi government and prompted a renewal of US military action in Iraq. In Syria, the group has conducted ground attacks on both the Syrian Arab Army and rebel factions.\n\n_URL_0_\n\nISIS/ISIL/IS was created in 2006, and that, is the end of that.\n\nNow, you lot go do what you do best: harrassing restaurant owners in DC with false pedophilia accusations.", "819" ], [ "Sure, the question isn't about winning, but mandate. And if <PERSON>, ghastly person that she clearly is, can beat <PERSON> by millions of votes, the problem with the Democratic party isn't getting votes. It's about getting votes in a certain key state.\n\n<PERSON> has won the presidency with the biggest popular vote loss in history. That means his win is a win, but the worst win in American history.\n\nSo, indeed, \"still winning\", but the *shittiest win* ever.\n\nNot only that, but *likely* winning by illegally conspiring with Russia to hack the DNC's e-mail server, a crime worse than Watergate because not only did his team resort to criminal activity, they did so in collusion with a hostile foreign rival.\n\nSo, given all that, the shittiest win in history by *fact*, and the very real *probability* of criminal collusion with a hostile foreign power, I don't see any reason for Republicans or far-rightists to be overly confident, overjoyed or proud.\n\nIn fact, the campaign and the presidency so far have been an utter shitshow.", "953" ], [ "> except for the fact the British also likes to poke fun at the French for the same thing \n\nYou may recall they were involved in the fraud.\n\n > and the simpsons called the French cheese eating surrender monkeys in 1995. \n\nYes, and <PERSON> revived it for more negative, serious ends, in the midst of the \"Freedom Fries\" malarkey.\n\n > The sentiment was no doubt re emphasized in 2003\n\nWhich is why I said \"recent wave\"\n\n > it's just a common way to poke fun at the French military failures in the modern era \n\nThe ***only*** thing that saved the Brits from being absolutely ***smashed*** by the Germans was the Channel. Yet they act as if it was their valor and military might and mock the Europeans for their cowardice. Don't make me laugh. From behind the safety of seawater, all they had to endure was air raids. No occupation, no genocide, no infantry and artillery. Then they waited for the Russians and the Germans to finish each other off before they joined in.\n\n\n\nAnd looking at the Americans, from Vietnam to Iraq to Afghanistan, they've had their fair share of running away as well as failure.\n\nThere is a strain of bitter jingoist pomposity going around in American, Russian, Chinese and British culture. From time to time, they get so drunk with nationalist grandiosity, they lose touch with reality, refuse to see their own weaknesses and failures, cling to mythology and dreams of empire and require an external force to ridicule.\n\nTo paint the French as cowardly surrenderers is an American and British national pastime, and before 2003 I hardly ever heard of it: now it's something every American or British armchair general comedian repeats as gospel.\n\nI'm not French, which is why I know I'm not responding out of nationalist spite. It's just disgusting knowing how this propaganda went off the charts in an effort to destroy the reputation of a nation who dared resist America's illegal war.\n\nIt's especially disgusting, seeing as the French gave the Americans their nation, and later the Statue of Liberty, seeing as 5 million French people died in World War I. After World War II, in which the French resistance fought valiantly, you just don't start major wars without taking on the image of a rogue state and aggressor.\n\nNevertheless, France participated and assisted in the First Gulf War in 1991, came to the U.S.' aid in Afghanistan in 2002 and fought there, subsequently kept the peace in Ivory Coast when it was asked, kept the peace in Haiti and Lebanon, fought in Libya and Mali in 2011 and 2013 and joined the U.S. in the fight against IS.\n\nSo you'll forgive me when I tell the children on the internet who parrot the \"French = Coward/White Flag\" meme to grow the fuck up.", "120" ], [ "There is a significant difference between seeing an animal as a tool and treating it with respect; a tool is an object to be dispensed with after it has outlasted its utility.\n\nSo either it is not a tool and has dignity or it is a tool and it loses the value of life. That what the semantic meaning of \"tool\" connotes.\n\nI understand this conversation is going nowhere, but I'll gladly take the downvotes to emphasize that one more time. \n\nIf you want to see an animal as a \"tool\" first and foremost, that could well be an acceptable moral act in present-day society. Don't then also claim a tool is a living animal to be treated with respect. Then it's not a tool: it's an animal with a job. Like a person with a job, also not a \"tool\".\n\nYou may have the last word.", "766" ], [ "Yes, what she did was a disruption of the court, disrespectful of the judge, the proceedings and the victim's relatives. Yes, she should go to jail for it. The law and the imprisonment is just and legal.\n\nInherently, law codifies what people think is morally wrong. You think it goes too far in this case, others don't, the status quo is in favor of the others.\n\nNow what, smartass?", "733" ], [ "> Laws codify what are and are not a violation of rights, anything more is an unnecessary and unjust function of an overly-invasive government. The only time morals have anything to do with it is at the most basic level asking \"Should individual rights be preserved?\"\n\nThat's your *opinion*.\n\n > I would love to know how the subjective concept of \"disrespect\" ever came to be a legally punishable action.\n\nI can just repeat:\n\nInherently, law codifies what people think is morally wrong. You think it goes too far in this case, others don't, the status quo is in favor of the others.\n\n > The disruption had allready occured, arguably at the hands of the judge herself.\n\nNo such thing happened, the judge didn't disrupt anything, she leads the proceedings and what you claim is a bald-faced lie.", "733" ], [ "> Fortunately your leaders are smarter than you and disagree. \n\nThe funny thing about American jingoists, to me at least, has always been their split personality towards this issue: one half wants to tell Europe to fuck off, but then the other half desperately wants to be needed.\n\nThey so deeply want to be needed, the colonel <PERSON>. \n\n > We valued freedom here.\n\nROFLMAO\n\n > address the ridiculous amount of hypocrisy, irony, factual errors, and logical inconsistencies\n\nIs there an echo in here? Or is your brain being operated on?", "227" ], [ "> Man did I hit a sore spot.\n\nNot at all! I'm complety \"zen\" as I write this. The topic does annoy me, you, on the other hand, are a dime a dozen. If anything it's your ineptitude in writing, not your argumentation: you have none. This, for me, has been a battle of wits with the unarmed. But remember: this is not a private conversation. That would never be worth it.\n\n > I don't need to justify the fact I am American. I am American and I am damn proud.\n\nYou're not even American yet, are you? You're a green card holder or something?\n\n > Rage on bruh.\n\nAre you a teenager or in your early twenties? Who even speaks like this unless they're still in puberty or a minority in greater London? ;)", "730" ], [ "> The first two are NEWS people.\n > \n > The rest are OPINION people.\n\nThey are all bullshit people, working for a bullshit organization.\n\nThe other day, this happened:\n\n[Fake Sweden expert on Fox News – has criminal convictions in US, no connection to Swedish security](_URL_0_)\n\nIt now appears imperative that we provide English news from Europe to Americans to compensate for the nonsense Americans are being fed by their own.", "6" ], [ "They're pretty simple and similar, actually. They all want to destroy the E.U., they're all anti-intellectual and anti-immigrant, they're populist, absolutist, sometimes outright fascist... and they all *adore* totalitarian murderous dictator <PERSON>, who also wants to destroy the E.U. and Europe.\n\nThey all want to destroy \"the system\" whatever the fuck that means in the heat of the moment. It usually tends to mean the judiciary, the free press, civil liberties, defense against influence from Russia, anything that could facilitate a new order of fascism.\n\n<PERSON> is a clown, literally.", "112" ], [ "An article like this appeals to Reddit's \"counter-circlejerk\" tendencies. \n\nAfter a while, Reddit tires of position A, so it starts to embrace its polar opposite, position B. These have to be positions not fully settled by culture or ideology.\n\nIt doesn't matter whether or not position B makes any sense, or has any evidence in support: what matters is that it is polar opposite of A, and that embracing B feels like a liberating exercise of freedom of choice.\n\nSo you get the twitchy, capricious Reddit mob spouting their uninformed opinions as they careen back and forth, like Leicester, promoting and relegating.\n\nThis Guardian piece is the journalistic example of that: pathological contrarianism decorated with the florid language of a columnist who wants to make a name for himself.\n\nHe's saying: \"Look at me, I'm distinguishing myself from the chorus of fans, pundits, players and experts condemning the sacking of <PERSON> - find me wise and distinct - read my writing - I'm different!\"\n\nAnd that's about all he has, the rest is mostly fluff. Take this sentence:\n\n > Meanwhile <PERSON> has become <PERSON> again, the same slightly twitchy manager sacked by Greece in his last job after his rejigs and hunches had confused the players.\n\nWhat kind of cretin writes such a thing?", "806" ], [ "There we go with the victim narrative again. <PERSON> and his fans have been bullying, harassing and threatening people as a key component of their campaign for a year. The_Donald has been botting and terrorizing Reddit to the point of moderator intervention on multiple occasions. /r/altright was banned for doxing campaigns and /r/pizzagate were shut down for orchestrating false pedophilia accusations that led to an entire street full of business owners being harassed by delusional far-right fruitcakes, even to the point of a Trumpist kook shooting up Comet Ping Pong.\n\nTerrorist attacks were committed in Canada and Sweden by <PERSON> supporters, while <PERSON> references three fake news terror attacks that never happened.\n\nYou're not the victims, you're the perpetrators, and you will be treated as such. As scum.", "294" ], [ "I'm not sure what you think you know, but let me teach you.\n\nMass surveillance in its current form exists since 9/11, is an American idea, using American infrastructure and American corporations. ([Source 1](_URL_3_), [source 2](_URL_1_)). It has only tangential relation to Echelon. The combination of increased data storage, increased data processing capacity, and human beings increasingly interacting through technology leaving transaction records enables governments to obtain the godlike power of omniscience, if not now, then eventually.\n\nAs for the false equivalence you're pushing: whether you know it or not, you are parroting the propaganda meme \"everybody spies\" pushed by American intelligence in the wake of the <PERSON> Leaks. Here's how that *really* works:\n\nNobody spies on the same scale as the United States:\n\n > Mr. <PERSON> found himself in September standing uncomfortably beside the president of Brazil, <PERSON>, who was furious at being named as a target of N.S.A. eavesdropping. Since then, there has been a parade of such protests, from the European Union, Mexico, France, Germany and Spain. Chagrined American officials joke that soon there will be complaints from foreign leaders feeling slighted because the agency had not targeted them.\n\n > <PERSON>, the director of national intelligence, has repeatedly dismissed such objections as brazen hypocrisy from countries that do their own share of spying. **But in a recent interview, he acknowledged that the scale of eavesdropping by the N.S.A., with 35,000 workers and $10.8 billion a year, sets it apart. “There’s no question that from a capability standpoint we probably dwarf everybody on the planet, just about, with perhaps the exception of Russia and China,” he said.**\n\n_URL_0_\n\n > **Few in Washington are challenging the administration's claim that \"all nations\" engage in similar forms of espionage.**\n\n > **However diplomatic sources have told the Guardian that the White House's declarations that its practices do not differ from those employed by \"all nations\" are deeply misleading.**\n\n > **The sources said that while the US, Russia, China, Britain and France are well-known to engage in aggressive cyber espionage, including against allies, many other countries do not have anywhere near the same surveillance infrastructure – and concentrate their more limited resources on counter-terrorism and serious crime.**\n\n_URL_2_\n\nEdit: also: how many instances can you list of Five Eyes nations spying on each other? \"Everybody spies\", right? What reports do we have of the U.K. spying on Canada? Australia spying on the U.S.? New Zealand spying on the U.K.? The U.S. spying on the U.K.? As far as we know, very little, if any, although there admittedly have been tensions and interference between the U.S. and Australia. That, and some minor friction in general.\n\nSo little interference between the five allies. Why is that? Could it be that the mantra \"everybody spies on everybody\" is a lie, and some are more equal than others?\n\nInteresting, isn't it?", "298" ], [ "Yeah, and we also have different definitions of \"leader\". \n\nYours is a man-child throwing delusional temper tantrums on Twitter.\n\nI know the majority of Americans had nothing to do with the election of this despicable treasonist fuck and are ashamed of him, yet here we are and it happened anyway. For all their misdeeds, <PERSON>, both <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON> at least had a touch of class, dignity and reverence for the office.\n\n<PERSON> is a disgrace, a filthy blot on Mount Rushmore, a nauseating embarrassment, one that can now never be wiped away from the annals of American history.", "614" ], [ "> I don't know. Historically, this is just their routine\n\nEvery single thread, every single time.\n\nAnd every time, no mention of Russia's increased global volume of ADIZ or even airspace intrusions, larger formations, increasingly reckless behaviour with civilian air traffic/transponders and more aggressive manoeuvring and posturing against intercepting pilots.\n\nThat, and going as far as conducting simulated nuclear attacks on, say, Sweden.\n\nThings have escalated considerably since 2014, yet every single thread, every single time, I find a highly upvoted comment in these threads claiming how routine it all is, when it certainly, definitely, indisputably *isn't*.\n\nOne can only look at it that way if one deliberately forgets the complete picture of wildly escalating Russian army, navy and air force manoeuvres the past three years and selectively forgets context.\n\nEdit: noticed an error.\n\nEdit 2:\n\nYou want evidence I'm right? In this specific case, even?\n\n\n > **Russia stopped conducting regular bomber patrols in the 1990s and early 2000s, but has increased its patrol activities in the Pacific Ocean following the Ukraine crisis in 2014 amid the resulting isolation from the West.** As I reported in October 2016 (See: “Russia to Set up Heavy Bomber Division to Patrol Japan, Hawaii, and Guam”), the Russian Aerospace Forces are in the process of setting up a new long-range heavy bomber division in Russia’s Far East to patrol the Pacific Ocean inside the Japan-Hawaii-Guam triangle.\n\n...\n\n > Japan’s MoD also announced earlier in the month that it recorded an uptick of 36 percent in the number of times the JASDF had to dispatch fighter jets in response to foreign military aircraft approaching the country’s airspace. Between April and December 2016, the JASDF scrambled its warplanes 883 times — 644 times in reaction to People’s Liberation Army Air Force aircraft and 231 times in reaction to the Russian Aerospace Forces. Six incidents involved Republic of China Air Force aircraft.\n\n > **If upward trends continue, the number of incidents could surpass 1,000 by the end of Japan’s fiscal year 2016 in March 2017. Fiscal year 2015 saw 873 overall sorties, with 288 in reaction to Russian military aircraft. During fiscal year 2014, Japan scrambled fighter jets 943 times, a record 473 of which were in response to the Russian Aerospace Forces.**\n\n_URL_0_\n\nYou decide if you want to believe the Kremlin apologist rubbish in this thread.", "381" ], [ "Actually, technically he did no such thing. His statement reads:\n\n > Ah yes silly Japan, obviously all airspace is belong to ~~Glorious Workers Paradise of CCCP~~ Russian Empire.\n\nWhich says nothing about Russia violating Japan's airspace: it simply states that all airspace belongs to Russia. It does not logically follow that the airspace in question must alternatively be Japan's, because that isn't the only alternative.\n\nObviously you knew that from the beginning, you just deliberately misunderstood his statement to construct your silly little straw man.\n\nWhich brings us here, where I am forced to exhaustively unpack a simple quip to settle this farcical \"discussion\".\n\nWell done, <PERSON>.", "629" ], [ "> Which facts seem \"alternative\" to you?\n\nThe entire sourceless Kremlin press release you just wrote.\n\n > **If upward trends continue, the number of incidents could surpass 1,000 by the end of Japan’s fiscal year 2016 in March 2017. Fiscal year 2015 saw 873 overall sorties, with 288 in reaction to Russian military aircraft. During fiscal year 2014, Japan scrambled fighter jets 943 times, a record 473 of which were in response to the Russian Aerospace Forces.**\n\n_URL_0_", "381" ], [ "> some basic inference skills would be recommended. \n\nI agree. And a basic training in the recognition of cognitive biases, reasoning errors and logical fallacies. In this case, recognizing that the negation of statement A doesn't magically imply that an illusory statement B must inferred as if it were the only feasible implied outcome.\n\n > the element he chose to exaggerate has been proven incorrect\n\nNo shit, <PERSON>, it's a fucking exaggeration.\n\n<PERSON>.", "414" ], [ "What would American <PERSON> voters know about that? They don't understand German, Germany, <PERSON>, or anything else, really. <PERSON> voters are fake news consuming cretins and pathological liars who can't even come to grips with crowd numbers at an inauguration, let alone matters of sociological or geopolitical import. \n\nThe few intellectual lights among them can't shine through the sea of psychopathic, solipsist shit they're swimming in.\n\nThe bumper sticker American won this election, they are \"fascistifying\" the nation and its goverment at an absolutely dizzying pace and simultaneously spewing their pathological filth all over social media.\n\nThese people are an absolute cancer on this world, just like the \"poor, victimized\" Filipinos who elected that mass murdering, <PERSON>-partnering lunatic <PERSON>. \n\nWhat the ... no I'll stop here before I lose my cool.", "220" ], [ "Do you know in what year 9/11 happened? One can hope. Read on if you want to know why I ask.\n\n > PRINCETON, NJ -- Three in 10 Americans interpret the Bible literally, saying it is the actual word of God.\n\n_URL_1_\n\n > According to a new Pew Research Center analysis, six-in-ten Americans (60%) say that “humans and other living things have evolved over time,” while a third (33%) reject the idea of evolution, saying that “humans and other living things have existed in their present form since the beginning of time.” The share of the general public that says that humans have evolved over time is about the same as it was in 2009, when Pew Research last asked the question.\n\n_URL_0_\n\nTaking into account population growth, we're looking at approximately 100 million total fucking idiots. Bonus:\n\n > Asked what year the attacks occurred, the numbers were a bit worse. Only a bit over two-thirds of adults correctly identified the attacks as having occurred in 2001, a figure that decreased as respondents got older. Those 65 or older only got the year right about half the time — but, then, they’ve had a few more years to keep track of. And, for that matter, a few more national tragedies.\n\n_URL_2_\n\nAbout a third of Americans don't know what year 9/11 was. \n\nI'd be surprised if they could spell their own name.\n\nTherefore, such a gigantic volume of stupid people isn't \"far-fetched\" at all. In fact, it is reality. <PERSON> voters, not all of them, but most of them, represent a unique toxic overlap of bible-thumpers, science haters, racists, misogynists, white nationalists and a hodge-podge of other ignorant malcontents.\n\nAnd you expect these fucktards to opine on the intricacies of German domestic politics?\n\nI have a better explanation. They are brainwashed alt-rightist fucktards who parrot anti-German hate speech they gobble up on their stupid fucking websites, and they don't have the *slightest clue* what they're on about.\n\nEdit: and I assure you, plenty of Americans in the other bracket are just as pissed off as I am. They are forced to watch this despicable fascist cretin reintroduce torture and turn pathological lying into an official PR policy.", "960" ], [ "I wonder why a libertarian fraud would pretend to be \"old\" and \"leftist\".\n\nYou're not the only one over 35 present. I am. But frankly I wouldn't give a fuck if you were 90. It is a complete myth that wisdom accompanies old age as if by magical metamorphosis. If you were stupid, you still are stupid, and you will remain stupid. \n\nYou are lecturing about nothing, calling somebody who actually gives a shit a narcissist, but that seniority you like to throw around: that's vanity. You're not wise. You're weak. And that compromising, milquetoast disposition is the absolute perfect enabler for psychopaths like <PERSON> and <PERSON>. The world doesn't need more <PERSON>, <PERSON> or <PERSON> either: the world needs <PERSON>: an old man with some fighting spirit and guts. \n\nBut in the end, personalities are unimportant, principles are. Remember that next time you feel like playing <PERSON>.", "495" ], [ "> I don't see how this is even news\n\nThe 90 people who upvoted you didn't, the 800 who upvoted this thread apparently do.\n\nI never understood the utility of walking into a thread to start complaining it's \"not news\". Maybe not to you and a few others, so why don't you scupper on out of here then and find something you *do* find interesting.\n\nOf course, that's not what it *really* is: you're a <PERSON> sympathizer and this is your way of expressing disagreement. After all, you said:\n\n > Good luck, America. A more intelligent <PERSON> wannabe (<PERSON>) just announced his intention to lead our conservative party. We might be right there with you in a few years. \n\n\nYou don't find it uninteresting or \"not news\" at all: you're just offended and hurt that a politician from your own country joins the ranks of the sane and decent people around the world condemning this piece of shit as the fascist he obviously is.", "856" ], [ "> I'm saying that the more you learn in life, the more empathy you will have for your fellow citizens.\n\nThe complete lack of self-awareness of this statement is absolutely stupefying. Where was your \"empathy\" for Mexicans when <PERSON> accused them of sending rapists to the United States? Where was your \"empathy\" for gay people when <PERSON> put <PERSON> on the ticket? Where was your famed \"empathy\" for Muslims when <PERSON> proposed banning them entirely, before settling on another one of his fucktard concoctions, which hits, for example, Iraqi minorities fleeing their country to the one which owes them everything after the carnage they inflicted, where was your fucking \"empathy\" for women when <PERSON> bragged about being able to \"do anything\" including grabbing them by the pussy? Or when he attacked women on Twitter? Where was your empathy for your fellow citizens or fellow *human beings* for that matter?\n\nWhere was your \"empathy\" for black people when <PERSON> disgraced the entire nation by becoming the most visible proponent for a disgusting racist conspiracy theory about <PERSON> for years on end? Where was your so-called \"empathy\" when <PERSON> took aim at scientists and made his supporters collectively even dumber than they already are with his preposterous anti-scientific delusions?\n\nIs there any group <PERSON> and his crony supporters haven't bullied, harassed, smeared, threatened or humiliated? \n\nThat, and the utter mental illness of <PERSON> supporters labeling themselves \"victims\" after unleashing this constant stream of utter SHIT on their fellow citizens and foreigners? \n\nYou want sympathy? Try looking between 'R' and 'T' in the dictionary.", "219" ], [ "> insulting someone is a terrible way to change their mind on something. \n\nAnd yet the <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON>-type of politician keeps gaining momentum while their core modus operandi is bullying, ridicule, humiliation, incitement, pathological lying, provocation, memetic shitposting and a psychotic siege mentality.\n\nSo which is it? \n\nEither these four hardly insult people or they do and they are succesful nonetheless.\n\nThe reality is that the left has Stockholm Syndrome and wishes to mollycoddle its \"alt-right\" fascist encirclers.", "16" ], [ "> That's all it took. \n\nWhy? I don't see any causal explanation by from you how that paragraph implies partisanship. I'm sure you *think* you're cogent here, and it's not that I don't appreciate listening to a grab bag of older posts, but do try to make sense.\n\n > So many people seem to embrace a two party system\n\nSo tell me, you persistently ignorant, raving fuck: which party and system am I for?", "856" ], [ "> Keep on 'fighting' racism, xenophobia and Islamophobia online. \n\nKeep making assumptions.\n\n > Pretend that it is very helpful\n\nFrom Russian troll factories, to American intelligence, to Chinese and Israeli propaganda online, to t_d on this very site, as well as its counterparts, as well as this thread itself, this battle will continue. You're not a \"curator of positive thinking\" you despicable fucking hypocrite. The only problem for you is that deep down you know you're like a spoon in a gunfight. So you think singing the praises of spoons will save you.\n\nNow, earlier I asked you a question. I asked you which party and system I was for. You've been trying to divert and distract since. In fact, you've not answered a single straightforward question appropriately.", "827" ], [ "There clearly is and was Russian meddling; various things are mentioned, but for <PERSON> to host a bunch of Russian students from Russotrudnichestvo (<PERSON>, ring a bell?) and market them as Ukrainian is the height of gullible stupidity.\n\n > For his part, Mr. <PERSON> acknowledged that some of his “Ukrainian” helpers were perhaps Russian but said it was not his job to verify their identities.\n\n > “I never ask people to see their passports,” he said during an interview in The Hague. “If they support our political platform they are welcome.”\n\n\nWhat a complete idiot.\n\nTo think I have voted SP all my life, I will never do so again.", "629" ], [ "Direct democracy would have prevented the ascent of <PERSON> into office, ironically opposite of <PERSON>'s exact warning.\n\nOf course, any democracy must be safeguarded against destruction from within through constitutional guarantees, but no democracy is safe from populist movements where populations become beholden to mass hysteria and, given the right conditions, destroy the very institutions they themselves once erected. \n\nTo imply that the American framers' elitist electoral college beats direct democracy in terms of expressing the will of the people, and to proclaim it \"perhaps the nearest approach to an *actual* democracy yet seen in the world\", when it was and is actually a watered down version of its foreign predecessors, that is simply a 1920s version of the same exceptionalist hubris filling up /r/shitamericanssay today.\n\nThe best Constitution? Minus the black people 3/5ths of a person clause, fortunately removed, yes, probably. Best democracy in 1920? Nonsense.\n\nEdit: spelling", "593" ], [ "> dropping the charade of claiming to be a politically neutral sub\n\nDespite what the modern internetting parade of Trumpian fascists think, opposition to this outrageous, corrupt, dictatorial lunacy isn't a question of \"neutrality\". It's a question of common sense, faith in basic, fundamental, constitutional rules. \n\nThere has never been anything like this monster in the White House. People tend to want to downplay events happening in front of them and attribute more \"seriousness\" to things that happened in the past, which, of course, is self-deceiving nonsense.", "827" ], [ "> what do you thing he is gonna due that is going to affect you specifically in anyway? \n\n<PERSON>'s backers are financially funding <PERSON> to the tune of hundreds of thousands. This movement is international and involves Kremlin puppeteering and facilitation. The <PERSON> White House coming to power directly impacts us in Europe who are currently battling <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON>.\n\nHave you been keeping abreast of recent events or have you just crawled out of your hole after a 2-year meditation?\n\n<PERSON>'s first military operation was a catastrophe.\n\nMany millions if not billions of foreign people will be directly affected by <PERSON>'s presidency.", "308" ], [ "> It's not that you said this is the straw that broke the camel's back which is something a never claimed you said. You said \"opposition to this outrageous, corrupt, and dictatorial lunacy\" **(emphasis mine)** (emphasis mine) in a thread and comment string where we're talking about a specific incident\n\nWho cares about what you emphasise? You think you get to emphasise \"this\" and then point to anything you like, then claim to read my mind and speak on my behalf? Is this seriously your best shot?\n\nI was quoting a comment, saying:\n\n > dropping the charade of claiming to be a politically neutral sub\n\nDoes the comment reference the thread topic?\n\nNo? Then try again, and think of a different spiel this time. \n\nSeriously, before you replied, I already knew what you were going to say. It's all so predictable.", "809" ], [ "> Because Alternative for Germany has far-right, like far to the right of <PERSON>\n\nYou have to have serious delusional nerve to \"warn\" about a fringe party in the German political system which is about one of the few sane left in the world.\n\n<PERSON> and his party are absolutely fucking bonkers far-right, beyond anything I have ever seen, and I was born when <PERSON> was president. Not only that, but on top, a group of fascist Putinists currently occupying the White House and their supporters agitating to turn Germany to the far-right because of the \"Islamist and refugee invasion\"\n\nAmazing, amazing delusion.\n\nI suggest you get your own house in order.", "1009" ], [ "That just makes me think he's an extreme weirdo. Having a prime minister who loves rimming people in darkrooms isn't my idea of a shining example of the Netherlands. He's free to do that, it's his right, but I can think he's disgusting too, that's my prerogative.\n\nHowever, what I find truly astonishing is how you're apparently prepared to ignore the *other* paragraph.\n\nI'm sure some Americans these days would prefer falsely accusing restaurants in DC of being pedophile networks and then shooting them up, but here we have an actual trace of pedophilia and you're blatantly ignoring it.\n\nWhy?", "504" ], [ "> That post showed nothing to disprove the above point, namely that he/she thinks that <PERSON> doesn't just pander but believes what he is saying.\n\nActually, if you read the book \"Undercover bij de PVV\" by <PERSON>, you'll know that the PVV actually constantly pander and mislead, but that's not really relevant anyway: there is no requirement to not believe what you're saying.\n\n > Only <PERSON> can confirm/deny what he believes himself\n\nNo, actually, a broad consensus of Dutch journalism can very well decide what <PERSON> and his party represent, because we have been able to study his idiotic incitement politics for 15 years if not more.\n\n > showing links to other people calling him populist doesn't change that\n\nSure it does: not only does it show consensus among domestic and international media organizations, I also cite an actual academic expert on right-wing populism.\n\nThis argument of the alt-right in this thread is a lost cause. I just absolutely demolished the entire argument, and your best response is nothing more than \"the other guy disproves you\" and \"here's a nonexistent criterion which must be met\" and \"you're only showing people calling him populist\" - yeah, no shit, <PERSON>.", "988" ], [ "> One reporter's claim, not an intelligence report.\n\nFalse. Read the source. You can read Dutch, I hope. The AIVD attempted to retrieve the disks, because they contained \"state secrets\" and the report cited, is, in fact, an intelligence report.\n\n > And what's the problem with him being gay?\n\nThere is a problem with raping Maroccan boys, as the intelligence report states. As for the rimming, different strokes for different folks. Darkroom rimjobs aren't at the top of my list of PM qualifications, but if he liked that, he can do whatever the hell he wants, I, in turn, can think and be of the opinion that I don't want a PM who is known for his extreme fancy for licking ass.", "624" ], [ "> Yes, because writers are known for being honest and not making things up in order to get book sales up.\n\nI have no reason to doubt the writer, and I have every reason to doubt pathologically lying internet trolls and their delusional, treasonist, Putinist leaders.\n\nYou're also dodging the second point. Address it.\n\n > And what I'm saying is that if you choose to define populism\n\nActually, not just me, but national and international consensus, and yes we can, including and especially the expert I cited.\n\n > Yes, call people you disagree with racists\n\nI'll call racists racists, and I don't give a flying toss if they like it or not. If you're a racist, or a fascist, my objective is to take you on and resist you, not convince you. You're already screwed up beyond redemption if you believe in racism and the destruction of the state and its institutions because they don't pander to your extremism. \n\nLet me know if you have a real argument.", "715" ], [ "\"<PERSON>\" means \"according to him\" and it relates to him saying he got the disks from an employee of the regional intelligence service (the RID).\n\nYou might be shocked by this, but this is how journalism works.\n\nAnd as far as the journalist goes, he has a stellar reputation solving unsolved crimes.\n\nNot only that, the AIVD wanted the disks back because they contained \"state secrets\". Why would they want them back if they were fake?", "749" ], [ "> Not all politicians seek to represent the interest of ordinary people. For many politicians, representing the interest of ordinary people instead of representing the interest of a certain, not necessarily financial affluent, elite.\n\n<PERSON>' current poll numbers represent about 18% of the total number of available seats. The reason he might win with that is because votes are scattered all over the place. However, it does mean that about 82% of the remaining seats are the result of votes by Dutch citizens who ***don't*** feel <PERSON> \"represents\" them, despite his claims to be \"for them\".", "207" ], [ "> It was just a small addendum at the bottom of my message and in no way the main point. \n\nActually, it was a pretty bold claim, and here you are still defending it.\n\n > Why the obsession? \n\nWhy your obsession?\n\n > Why the conspiracy thinking? \n\nThere is no \"conspiracy\": you're just one person spreading disinformation. I know this, because despite ample opportunity to revise your misleading statement, you don't, even if confronted with a large body of evidence you're wrong.\n\n > I guess you must think <PERSON> is a real nazi then.\n\nWe've had 15 years to assess <PERSON> and his politics. An assessment of <PERSON>' populist politics over all these years in no way compares to a slander campaign by a few American media, which is also easily disproven.", "969" ], [ "> I ignored it because I have no way of evaluating whether I should believe you when you say that.\n\nYou have plenty of idea, because I'm citing sources. This isn't up to you believing me.\n\n > I ignored it because I have no way of evaluating whether I should believe you when you say that. While with rimming I can judge you to be a weirdo\n\nI can judge you to be a clown as well for thinking you can judge me to be a weirdo for thinking that ass licking isn't a good qualification for PM. \n\nI mean, I *could*. But since this is all in the hypothetical and you're just hypothetically insulting me directly, here I am hypothetically doing the same. Not really, of course. Just possibly. Hypothetically. That's how people like you get around moderation these days, don't you?\n\n > without having to have a wider knowledge of Dutch issues.\n\nAnd what would you know about Dutch issues?", "248" ], [ "> Because you keep on bringing it up\n\nOf course, I'm responding to your responses, aren't I? How silly is it to allege I \"keep bringing it up\" when you're the one who keeps \"bringing it up\" as well in your responses?\n\n > You're the one who keeps bringing it up.\n\nSee above. \n\n > But your only argument is that you say that it's true \n\nFalse, and that is covered in the [post](_URL_0_), which you apparently didn't read. However, I'm not going to hold your hand and walk you through it: you're expected to do your due diligence and read the post for comprehension.\n\n > other people say that it's true so it must be true.\n\nAgain, this is covered in the [post](_URL_0_). Moreover, these aren't just random people, like you, the litany of sources I'm citing are respected mainstream media, and several experts are commenting. In fact, even other far-right writers like <PERSON> admit it.\n\n > Hardly a large body\n\nMany, many, many times larger than what you claim is just a:\n\n > small addendum at the bottom of my message and in no way the main point. \n\nYou did say this, did you not? \n\n\nThat \"small addendum at the bottom of your message and in no way the main point\", which is nothing more than your opinion as a random anonymous Redditor, now suddenly outweighs the laundry list of reliable mainstream sources I cited? \n\nI don't think so.\n\n > \"We\"? Who's we, is this the royal we? Your highness, is that you?\n\nDutch society, my precious.\n\nNotably journalists, academics, columnists, other politicians, etc. etc.\n\n > I'm just puzzled by why you think that should be done in such a hostile manner. \n\nI always think it's quite comical to see attackers spin such an elaborate victim narrative around their thread presence. \n\nOf course, you're not a victim at all, and from your allegations of \"obsession\" to \"conspiracy thinking\" to randomly claiming I must think Pewdiepie is a Nazi to trying to sarcastically address me as \"your highness\" ... what is it with the victim complex if you're clearly not a victim?\n\n > Here, I'll make it easier for you. You win. You have vanquished your enemy. I grovel before your might and wisdom etc etc. \n\nThat doesn't quite make it easier for me, because the extreme sarcasm, obviously, means you've done no such thing at all, quite the opposite. The real answer is that rather than actually putting in the same amount of work I put into collating that national and international consensus on <PERSON>' populism, you've been resorting to obfuscation and personal attacks (obsessed, conspiratorial, insinuations of neckbeardery, etc. etc.) *alone*.\n\nYou haven't really made your case, and it's important that for once, we have some opposition in threads like these where people with Dutch flairs think their Reddit comments are a substitute for journalism, academia, expertise or even just proper sourcing in general.", "247" ], [ "Sure I did. By the author of the original post's own admission, he only wrote a:\n\n > small addendum at the bottom of my message and in no way the main point. \n\n...Whereas I compiled a laundry list of national (Dutch) and international articles talking about <PERSON> and his populism. It wasn't just sheer quantity of media consensus, though: the compilation includes discussion by actual experts, one in particular who is a Dutch professor in the U.S. who specializes in far-right populism.\n\nWeighing two competing explanations, his and mine, there is no doubt whatsoever that the weight of the body of evidence I compiled demolishes a fleeting \"addendum\" without citations or proper academic scholarship by some Redditor whose only aim is to improve <PERSON>' standing as a serious politician, when in fact his entire party program is one sheet of paper. \n\nEdit: spelling", "566" ], [ "> Using the same negative logic 86% of Dutch Citizens don't feel that <PERSON> represents them and 98% of Dutch Citizens don't feel <PERSON> represents them.\n\nExactly!\n\n > Using similar flawed logic I could say: \"It is impossible to find somebody in the Netherland of whom Dutch citizens feel that represents them better than <PERSON>\"\n\nI can't quite make sense of this sentence. Could you rephrase into something somewhat comprehensible? No offense.", "856" ], [ "Like <PERSON> is cleaning up the mess right now? \n\nIt's quite clear how much of a failure alt-right populism is in governing already.\n\nAlso, you don't speak for the younger generation. And please tone down the personal attacks: next time is me pressing the report button and moving on. Either we all get to demonize or none of us get to.", "725" ], [ "Current trends in far-right extremism also prove <PERSON> right. So both <PERSON> and VvdG were right, it seems. The United States is currently in the process of a fascist takeover, as <PERSON> and his cronies wage war against the state they seek to destruct, with <PERSON> <PERSON> threatening France and <PERSON> threatening the Netherlands.", "827" ], [ "If you want to cite something, cite all of it.\n\n > Individuals with Moroccan or Antillean backgrounds are almost six times more likely to be suspected of a crime than native Dutch. Especially among 18 to 25-year-olds, there are relatively many suspects. For example, one in ten young adults with a Moroccan background is registered as a suspect. It must be said that among non-western youths, the second generation are more often suspects than the first generation. If we do not consider age, however, those with a non-western\nfirst-generation background are more often suspects. The largest difference between men and women is seen among people with a Turkish background: males are 6.8 times more likely suspected of a crime than females. Among native Dutch this ratio is 3.9.\n\n_URL_0_", "5" ], [ "In general, having to read Americans and their worldview on this sub is enough to want to die. It's one of the worst forms of psychological torture imaginable.\n\nThe cartels were trained by Americans.\n\n > The second manual, \"Human Resource Exploitation Training Manual - 1983\", was used in at least seven U.S. training courses conducted in Latin American countries, including Honduras, between 1982 and 1987.\n\n_URL_0_", "0" ] ]
210
[ 4250, 17349, 999, 10841, 525, 12410, 2092, 4586, 10683, 6702, 15496, 20063, 13708, 20899, 3371, 11315, 10827, 25455, 1478, 4243, 4618, 23497, 23694, 4450, 21400, 9239, 9913, 23093, 12420, 1103, 1210, 1953, 22626, 23860, 17236, 17590, 24844, 12461, 8273, 3072, 21060, 19186, 19342, 4835, 2223, 6510, 8946, 13092, 1278, 1331, 17053, 5708, 12507, 21198, 16138, 21070, 306, 24022, 14417, 3091, 5878, 1909, 4249, 22242, 9143, 2895, 3428, 8005, 23974, 22547, 8423, 24243, 1973, 11755, 12442, 10196, 19654, 12872, 7354, 19175, 19900, 25423, 22786, 20272, 16037, 710, 5052, 21953, 9409, 15666, 20038, 10389, 22006, 15916, 9439, 6105, 13983, 12261, 21680, 9287, 3271, 6459, 23174, 12820, 20850, 15481, 14449, 21553, 8719, 5544, 10272, 3497, 21922, 23586, 19138, 20068, 11590, 5962, 10237, 14275, 7466, 18681, 11984, 7284, 4347, 2767, 24942, 15135, 16030, 11827, 25474, 12913, 14598, 2282, 20811, 12359, 5667, 23318, 22315, 6876, 9139, 25159, 12776, 5532, 16500, 22495, 25201, 16152, 887, 25053, 17234, 25472, 21433, 4555, 24445, 7556, 2545, 11143, 8978, 922, 21648, 751, 18859, 504, 18562, 1616, 6162, 12893, 4199, 4488, 1259, 6465, 18682, 10226, 8932, 13114, 24128, 14451, 3071, 20851, 6344, 12897, 15423, 23281, 18697, 21742, 1580, 9104, 9745, 16209, 15330, 11156, 24983, 92, 475, 23293, 5760, 15085, 8734, 18344, 2794, 12503, 2134, 14938, 16166, 18842, 768, 23710, 18654, 18819, 24129, 1587, 5546, 18258, 10328, 24644, 16990, 7212, 14474, 14401, 8325, 1476, 4910, 17903, 16390, 2230, 8204, 22102, 15015, 7926, 25404, 21379, 25471, 12585, 9533, 4213, 8077, 12141, 14911, 23545, 1108, 13073, 11498, 20883, 12837, 13537, 9523, 1932, 923, 24308, 24127, 5219, 4280, 13500, 21832, 16607, 14319, 18843, 10163, 3719, 15346, 2917, 4277, 7119, 19058, 13002, 2784, 3993, 5054, 716, 10027, 20345, 457, 18614, 1236, 19859, 16329, 9475, 8118, 17382, 8580, 9431, 8974, 6989, 8712, 15589, 802, 17235, 8788, 7385, 21840, 14020, 8909, 4027, 10741, 5566, 21346, 3096, 13930, 24113, 628, 18728, 9225, 15762, 5481, 1560, 20188, 507, 7273, 12402, 7764, 4940, 24187, 8221, 11460, 9669, 25115, 22424, 19725, 24003, 11221, 9014, 21459, 3154, 642, 364, 4779, 11822, 6869, 6773, 19966, 10921, 18160, 11129, 12933, 6259, 12361, 21274, 17210, 5782, 13177, 20072, 4193, 11548, 19047, 4479, 11336, 7706, 19131, 17237, 9264, 19639, 7708, 346, 17631, 7219, 17829, 10957, 5371, 24083, 25322, 23280, 3446, 2478, 16258, 15628, 1745, 6501, 13882, 10593, 14360, 2088, 11395, 14627, 8886, 5976, 14072, 8940, 2107, 3788, 21792, 12888, 13200, 4121, 11949, 16080, 5238, 18280, 20530, 11959, 11733, 2516, 22886, 18536, 8426, 603, 23766, 19004, 15511, 11409, 6390, 7608, 23407, 24735, 12984, 23362, 21380, 23270, 5578, 24849, 23803, 5146, 7051, 15711, 8630, 11094, 24573, 20400, 11831, 3721, 24028, 10694, 7662, 2058, 11580, 4248, 11431, 5966, 19638, 14087, 6188, 3717, 3567, 3332, 6314, 15320, 10813, 1102, 10851, 1472, 5561, 20528, 8428, 18658, 18270, 20359, 5661, 8050, 22114, 8551, 25006, 22422, 18740, 18573, 456, 112, 15063, 12920, 24451, 13768, 22578, 18374, 10580, 739, 18704, 4740, 16793, 13921, 2879, 16019, 12591, 21099, 10283, 6145, 5653, 24367, 4353, 13077, 2321, 4162, 13333, 14527, 6704, 4538, 6596, 21811, 5185, 4529, 9802, 115, 12278, 15094, 10661, 15098, 6354, 4205, 19410, 1110, 10248 ]
reddit_dump_-SaC
[ [ "> This is the kinda shit (sic) that should make its way into a Fallout game...\n\nThere's no errors prior, did you mean something other than *(sic)* there?\n\n\n & nbsp;\n\n**Edit** (since you've now deleted the response):\n\n > *Because it was using both figurative and literal shit simultaneously.*\n\n & nbsp;\n\n*[sic]* indicates an error in the piece you're directly quoting / reporting, which you're leaving as it was originally spelled. \n\nFor instance, if I wrote in a press release \"It's a massive load of grease and shitt, which will take weeks to clear\", then you'd quote it as \"It's a massive load of grease and shitt *[sic]*, which will take weeks to clear\", because 'shitt' is an incorrect spelling but correcting it would be directly editing the quote (which obviously a reporter would want to avoid, even to that small degree). \n\nIt translates as 'thus', but is often remembered by the backronym 'spelled in context'.", "809" ], [ "Nah. We can’t be angry.\n\nYou can’t be angry at the child who has to go to school with shoelaces keeping their trousers up; it’d be wrong to point and call them ‘shit-belt’. A good belt might be too expensive for the family, or maybe old shoelaces were good enough for their grandparents growing up, so they’re good enough for everyone. But it’s not the child’s fault if they grow up thinking the shoelaces are the height of fashion and remind them of childhood.", "335" ], [ "Metaphor nicer than just saying ‘Hershey’s is shite that tastes of vomit thanks to the butyric acid, but if you grew up with it then it reminds you of your childhood and many people have a positive association with it, which is understandable.’\n\nBut to address the TV licence, like any service, if you don’t use it then you just don’t pay. I don’t pay for the BBC because I don’t use it. I also don’t pay for Xbox live because I don’t have an Xbox, for Netflix or for food subscription boxes.\n\nThere’s a weird assumption that everyone has to pay the TV licence, when not too many bother. Those who do tend to be very happy with the TV they get in return; hundreds of ad-free hours of <PERSON>, Doctor Who or whatever else box sets is probably well worth it to them. So they pay to access it. \n\nNot sure I know anyone who pays for a licence. There’s probably an aunt or something somewhere in the family who does, but that’s down to them.", "526" ], [ "I’ve considered getting a licence as there’s an absolute shedload of content for the money; movies, full box sets of apparently basically everything the BBC has made from Doctor Who to all of the <PERSON> nature documentaries, sports and so on.\n\nI might get round to it sometime. It’s a couple of quid more than Netflix per month, but I ran out of stuff I really wanted to watch on Netflix after a few months. \n\nBut yeah, there seems to be a weird assumption that everyone is automatically signed up and forced to pay, or something. Like if you were told you had to get breakdown cover, even if you don’t drive a car.", "526" ], [ "The flag being absolutely everywhere is my lasting memory from visiting the US. \n\nComing from somewhere where house flags are incredibly bloody rare (and can often tell you a lot about the sort of person living there), it was just so jarring to see. No reason why not, if that’s what people want to do, but it’d be like going to a country where everyone has a pet deer on a lead in the local park. Your brain just has to keep readjusting.", "744" ], [ "Some countries now have laws banning this. In the U.K., what’s shown has to exist in a ‘reasonable portion’ of the game, and be available to the player within a reasonable amount of time - ie, if the game has 500 levels, don’t just show the shiny glitzy bonus level 499 on the ad. \n\nThat match-3 game where you ‘renovate a garden’ got a bollocking recently because the puzzle their ad showed was only available something like 120 levels in, and that was the only instance of it in the game.\n\nAs you say, it’s purely to get people to give them money based on false advertising.", "905" ], [ "Had a customer request two refunds for items that hadn’t arrived. \n\nShe ordered them (separately) on Sunday night. The refund request was sent 4pm yesterday, around 18 hours after the purchase. \n\nWhen I pointed out that they only went in the post at 10am that morning, she got very cross and said she’d waited in all day for them. \n\nAfter working out what the issue was, I patiently explained that ‘1 day despatch’ doesn’t mean ‘next day delivery. She wasn’t having any of it. Amazon can deliver the same day, I was told, so next day delivery was the minimum we should expect from others.\n\nShe was also angry that she can’t leave me negative feedback yet (as eBay doesn’t allow it so quickly). Apparently that’s me disabling negative feedback to make myself look good.\n\nWe left it with her telling me she’s sending them straight back when they arrive as she needed them today. She wants me to pay the return postage. I don’t have to, so I certainly won’t be.\n\n & nbsp;\n\nAll this over packets of buttons for £2.95.\n\n & nbsp;", "467" ], [ "This has been posted many times, and it’s extremely wrong. It is pointed out every time, but still gets trotted out by people who don’t check before posting.\n\n[Here’s a forum post from 2013 with this map and people trying to work out what the heck is going on with it.](_URL_1_)\n\n[And a Quora post going into the origin of this map,](_URL_0_) a sensationalised book by <PERSON>.\n\nThe issue is that it counts all of the countries the army has ever set foot in as ‘invasion’ - such as Belgium in WWI, Italy in WWII et al.\n\nIt also includes countries that didn’t even bloody exist the last time British forces went near them, regardless of intent.", "773" ], [ "The book this map comes from seems to define an invasion for the purposes of this map as:\n\n* any military presence in a country, including in support of the local power;\n\n* any naval actions in territorial waters, even against third parties;\n\n* military actions by non-state actors such as British mercenaries and pirates, assuming they had at least tacit consent by Britain.\n\n & nbsp;\n\nBy <PERSON>’s weak definitions for his map, that means that if your next door neighbour was being beaten in his garden by a guy with a baseball bat and you went and helped him out, you have just made a hostile attack on your next door neighbour. \n\nIt means that if you were flying a British fighter plane in pursuit of a German bomber and they passed through the Netherlands airspace, Britain and Germany both (according to <PERSON>), at that moment, invaded the Netherlands. \n\nIt’s a ridiculously weak set of vague self-defined conditions for something that has an actual dictionary definition. Like me deciding that my kitchen sink now counts as as a public swimming pool because other people have been in my kitchen once upon a time, and they may have wet their hands in the sink.", "157" ], [ "If it’s a soft stone, drill a few small holes horizontally, chip out slit, drill again with longer drill and repeat until you reach the bottom, then jam sword in.\n\nIf it’s a very hard stone, do the same to a shallower depth, break the sword so you can remove a middle section of the blade, then jam the top section of the sword in the top of the stone. Repeat underneath with the bottom of the sword. Hey presto, ‘sword in a stone’.", "473" ], [ "You’re correct, they were a tad more valuable that, say, in the Elizabethan period where swords were for fashion as much as utility and you could purchase one on a sliding scale ranging from barely more than a good loaf of bread up to...well, the sky’s the limit.\n\nLaptop wouldn’t work too well, though. You want a laptop for plastering, not stirring.", "127" ], [ "> Page 403 of the 2011 Swindon Yellow Pages.\n\nOnly goes up to 332, since ‘11 was the year of the Swindonian General Phone Strike, in which all landlines bar business numbers went on strike for better conditions. Peacefully resolved, though there was an attempted coup by a pearl white slimline cordless handset, now believed to be living ex-directory under an assumed name.", "882" ], [ "And <PERSON> mother was forced to dance herself to death in red hot iron boots for trying to have her daughter killed and her lungs harvested.\n\nPlus sleeping beauty becomes pregnant and gives birth to the prince’s baby while still in her comatose state.\n\nAnd as for a naked <PERSON> having to piss and shit in the bed with the wolf...\n\nThe old versions are weird and a bit messed up. Though the ‘Littel Gest’ of <PERSON> is boring as arses, compared to the exciting later versions.", "420" ], [ "Once she knows the wolf is going to eat her, and the wolf knows, she tries to work out how to leave. The wolf makes her strip so she won’t just run away, and get into the bed. She thinks hard and says she needs to go outside to use the privy, but the wolf says she’ll just run away, so do it where she is or be eaten for lying. So she pisses the bed.\n\nThen she steps it up a notch to be allowed to leave for the privy, but again is told to do it there, so shits the bed. \n\nWolf falls asleep, she cuts open his stomach and fills it with rocks, flees, wolf wakes up and goes to drink at the river, falls in and drowns.", "810" ], [ "Not in the very early <PERSON> translation. Her Mum is the Queen, extremely jealous of her daughter, and sends her out with the huntsman to be murdered. She demands her lungs as proof (a later translation adds ‘to eat’), the huntsman kills a deer and presents those lungs instead.\n\nAt the end of the story, her mother is made to dance herself to death in red hot iron boots at the wedding.\n\nBecomes stepmother very quickly, which is better.", "857" ], [ "<PERSON> is a very weird one when it comes to age her, as it says she went into the tower aged 12 and very shortly after, the prince came. After an unspecified period of time, <PERSON> was found to be pregnant when she complained that her clothes were starting to get tight, then the old crone laid in wait for the prince. \n\nIt’s theoretically possible the prince waited a few years before humping away, but very unlikely in the grand scheme of things.\n\n<PERSON> I need to re-read, the Littel Gest is so bloody dull though compared to later versions. Not heard the king part, does <PERSON> order the nuns to kill him?", "475" ], [ "<PERSON> book ‘An Orc On The Wild Side’ gives a really good reinterpretation of <PERSON>, concentrating on why it was so easy to find out his name. \n\nVery long story short, he’s a NY mob money launderer whose eternal punishment has been to travel through time and parallel universes to atone for his sins by stopping great wars, which he does by spinning straw to gold. Both sides of the conflict want gold, so set more land to wheat, which requires soldiers being brought back to help, which gives plenty of bread almost as a side product, and suddenly gold is near-useless but straw is a de facto currency. Both sides have forgotten the war, and are trading straw with each other, building infrastructure, commerce centres, educational centres of learning to study better crop yields...then <PERSON> is moved to his next ‘target’ in another place and time.", "846" ], [ "<PERSON> has a troll or ogre under the bridge, though it does generally get drowned and washed away at the end.\n\n<PERSON> fills the wolf with rocks, and he’s pissed off that she’s escaped after his hard work, so goes for a drink at the river and falls in. The rocks part continues in some versions quite late on, and there are certainly illustrated copies of the book going up to the ‘80s that feature that particular ending for the wolf. I learned to read with one of them; I’d need to check but it might be one of the old ‘read yourself’ ladybird books.", "420" ], [ "There are something like 60 versions as far as I know, and the rocks ending only features in some (in others, the woodsman just comes in and chops the wolf’s head off, chases him away, cuts him open and let’s him die, etc.) - but even then, it’s subdivided. In the version I mentioned, <PERSON> is alive and cuts him open to fill him with rocks. In others, the woodsman comes in and they both do it together. In others, the wolf just eats <PERSON>, so the woodsman cuts him open to get <PERSON> out and *then* fills him with rocks. In yet others, both <PERSON> and her grandmother are in there to be rescued.\n\nThe whole story, other then the beginning, is really like one of those choose-your-own-adventure books. There are many different versions of each major section after the beginning, and they vary by age and popularity.\n\nInterestingly, as far as I’m aware, the beginning is always the same - grandmother sick in bed, <PERSON> sends red out with a basket, tells her to stay on the path and keep away from the wolf. She strays, meets the wolf, tells him where she’s going. After that, it’s a choice of continuations.\n\nBut with regard to the being able to cut him open, in the versions where <PERSON> (a seven year old girl) does it, I suppose we just have to take it as creative licence that she knows how to do it and the wolf won’t wake up.", "420" ], [ "I got a steak out for Christmas dinner, then a small one for today. Made dinner last night, couldn’t eat half of it, so now I’ve got half of my Christmas dinner plus a whole little steak which I suspect I’ll have tomorrow instead. \n\nBeen saving that steak that I had yesterday since summer, I don’t want to waste the rest of it in sandwiches rather than a meal. \n\nThe snacks, though...oh boy, the snacks. Three boxes of mince pies already in the freezer.", "967" ], [ "Yeah, they freeze really well. When Aldi reduce them I always buy about five boxes, freeze them, and will get a few a week out as a snack. Usually lasts me until about April, May.\n\nI’ve got a shelf that’s just for that sort of thing. Egg, mashed potato, dough, milk, mince pies, jam doughnuts, mr <PERSON> style cakes if reduced, jam tarts etc.", "794" ], [ "On this line, I can very much recommend \"A Victorian Schoolboy In London, 1881\", the diary of <PERSON> (14). \n\nA middle class teenage boy is forced to write a diary by his (minister) father, and it starts off basically pissed off that he's being forced to do it, but eventually gets into it. Lots of everyday stuff about life in London in 1881, but there's a huge, huge number of doodles and pictures he draws to illustrate people he meets, diagrams of how playing on 'the pole' (a scaffolding pole on a rope) in his garden works, drawings of places he goes and his family (especially his much-loved younger brother <PERSON>) at special events, and so on. The drawings are all copied into the published version. \n\nA contrast to the tragedy of <PERSON>, of course, but they're both quite intimate works that give us an insight into people who, ultimately, never got to live out the future lives they were thinking about and hoping for in their diaries. \n\n( > !<PERSON> died a few years after the diary aged just about 18, when he was thrown into a wall by a horse. His favourite younger brother <PERSON> had died only a few months before, having run away to sea aged 16. He was on a ship that went down with all hands lost.! < )", "846" ], [ "To be honest, mine's not really big enough to do it. I've just got one of the small under-counter style ones, so if I've got mince pies or anything like that in, I have to rearrange my plans for a while to ensure I've got enough space. That or a super game of tetris. \n\nI'm looking to maybe get a cheap second one from the British Heart Foundation, as currently my three shelves consist of 'veg & potato shelf', 'meat, egg, and leftovers shelf' and 'bread and misc shelf'. I want to be able to buy a 2ltr tub of ice cream one day and not have to sacrifice a loaf of bread to do so.", "295" ], [ "Hahaha, yeah. I’ve gone a bit over the top this yeah, as it’s the first year I’ve been able to buy nice things for people since about 2011. I keep seeing silly things like old Bunty annuals and adding those for people - I’ve got another two on the way xD", "527" ], [ "Oh oh oh! I got an Epson XP-225 and some sets of unbranded bulk inks, if that helps find something cheaper. They epson is dead cheap by itself, but I also got the inks really cheap.\n\nBought 18 each of XL cyan, blue and magenta plus 36 of XL black (90 total split into 3 sets of 30) for £22.77 in March 2016, still going through them. I print for work every day, and closing in on 5 years later I think I have about 4-6 left of each colour plus about 8 or so black. Still working perfectly.\n\nCame from a company called Printing Pleasure on Amazon, they were sold under the product title ‘30 (6 sets + 6 black) compatible epson ink cartridges’.", "885" ], [ "I enjoy working for myself, even if the income is very low. I have the opportunity to build up the business with hard work and a bit of luck, and really enjoy developing skills as well as learning about the constantly-changing trends and fashions. Over this year I’ve managed to build up to the point where I’m now on par with what I’d be getting if I were still on the dole, and I’m incredibly proud of that - it means that, for the first time, what I’m doing isn’t entirely pointless. \n\nThere are some parts of the job in terrible at - I’m absolutely bloody awful at marketing and anything related (as some who know me here can attest to!) but I’m trying. \n\nI get to contribute to my local and the wider communities, which has brought me more in touch with people compared to the distance I tried to keep previously.\n\nIn general, I work really long hours and days - I work 7 days a week, generally 14-16hrs a day, every day of the year (though I have Christmas morning off), but it doesn’t really feel like work since all I’m doing is sorting beads, photographing buttons, putting sequins into packets or similar while in the background I’ve got documentaries on, podcasts, audiobooks or whatever I want. It’s not like ‘proper’ work, when I used to stand in a shop stacking shelves or whatever else. \n\nAs others have said, be friendly and you’ll be fine. Office gossips are the worst, you’ll soon get to know everyone. Best of luck!", "1005" ], [ "I usually do use Hermes (they’re really good just in my local area), but I know they’re really bad by <PERSON> and lost two boxes of parcels last year, sadly. Everyone decent is around the same sort of price, so it’s just a case of choosing my poison, sadly.\n\nThere’s some breakables in this lot, so I don’t reaaaally want to risk it with anyone too cheap, if that makes sense.", "1015" ], [ "Hopefully they’re still available, but I chose this particular printer as my IT bloke at work at the time told me that (in his opinion) they’re the cheapest decent all-in-one that there are mass-produced cheap non-branded cartridges for. That might have changed, but hopefully they’re still around.\n\nI think I paid about £30 for the printer, so with the £24ish for all 90 extra cartridges, that’s put me at under £55 for the lot, about £11/year plus I definitely have enough for another year or so.\n\nAs a tightarse bastard, this makes me very happy.", "583" ], [ "One of our parents gave birth, not one of the ones in my class but one I vaguely knew from a colleague’s class.\n\nThey came in to show the baby off after school one day, as parents often did, and started at one end of the school and worked their way down. \n\nI hear running feet. Secretary comes haring down the corridor into my room and drags me to one side.\n\n‘(Parent) is here with the baby. DO NOT ASK QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SECOND ONE.’\n\nShe ran off to tell the person next door before I could ask any questions. Now, I didn’t even know they’d had twins, but then they weren’t in my class so I wasn’t really at the forefront of the information, so evidently there were twins but one of them...I don’t know, had a squint? Cleft lip? Something I’d notice and wasn’t to make a big deal about. Fair enough.\n\nI heard the parent coming up the corridor to the room next door, and lots of muffled ‘ohhhh, how lovely!’ and similar noises coming from my colleague on that side. Then the *back* door of my classroom opens and the colleague from next door comes in looking horrified. She’d left the parent talking to a TA to come and warn me.\n\n‘(Secretary) just came and said not to ask about one of the twins,’ I said, ‘what’s wrong with them?’\n\nColleague shook her head and said ‘nothing’. She told me that the two little bundles of joy were called <PERSON> and <PERSON>, and she’d opened up the blankets to have a good peek and a coochie-coo at the babies.\n\n<PERSON> and <PERSON> were not twins.\n\n > !<PERSON> was not a baby.! < \n\n > !Lotus was the placenta. Wrapped in a blanket. Purple and veiny, still attached to the baby. Staining the blanket.! < \n\n > !Mum was having a ‘Lotus birth’, where they were keeping the placenta attached until it dropped off. They kept it wrapped in separate blankets to the baby and talked about it almost as if it was a twin. They were going to keep it and preserve it once it dropped off naturally.! < \n\n > !In her haste to see the ‘other’ baby, my colleague had almost grabbed a handful of big purple veiny placenta.! < \n\nI went and hid in an outside cupboard so I wouldn’t have to see.", "770" ], [ "For once, nah. I got a ClearanceXL order that had an [absolute shitload of out of date cakes](_URL_0_) like Mr <PERSON>, Lyons, Cadbury etc in it. \n\nCost me just over £20 for everything in that pic, but there was also another box full of water bottles too (about 24 more, I think). I ended up with most of those cakes in the freezer, though the battenburgs went out for the birdies because...yeah, nah.", "783" ], [ "I think <PERSON> might be the original emotional support animal. <PERSON> was definitely born too early and thus missed by the ADD people.\n\n“<PERSON>, please deliver this parcel to Lord-“\n\n“Okay, at the stately home ooh it’s heavy ooh ooh”\n\n“Yes, now please delivery it quickly, but be careful and don’t -“\n\n“HOLY FUCK THERE’S A FUCKING SUIT OF FUCKING ARMOUR IN HERE!”\n\n“-Yes, it’s very valuable and has just been restored. Please close the box and take it t-“\n\n“IMMA FUCKIN WEAR THIS JESS LOOK LOOK LOOK I’M A FUCKIN KNIIIIIGHT”\n\n“<PERSON>, please take it off; it’s very valuable and you might-“\n\n“OKAY GONNA DELIVER NOW BYYYYYEEEE”\n\n-*distant clanking followed by the sound of someone trying to change gear in full armour-*", "25" ], [ "Exactly. This’ll be people bidding to piss off the scalper, who’s going to see the auction finish with a stack of bidders, none of whom are going to pay.\n\nTheir options are either to keep offering a ‘second chance’ bid to each lower bid in turn and waste several weeks trying to get through everyone, or take the hit and just cancel the sale & try relisting. \n\nAnd exactly the same will probably happen again.", "937" ], [ "I thought the kids aspect of Stardew Valley would be more involved than it was, with them growing to maybe take over one day, or at least help you out. As it is, I completely avoid having them as they’re just a bit of a hassle that adds nothing of real value to the game. Hopefully that might be addressed at some point, the game is huge as it is so there’s no massive drama in skipping having kids.", "361" ], [ "It’s practically a god-tier magical item that certainly nobody should just be able to go out and buy or choose, that’s something you go out and quest hard and long for at a very high level, or get incredibly lucky with a deck of many things. It’s like hearing your ten year old niece learning Baa Baa Black Sheep on the violin, so you go and spend a couple of million on a Stradivarius for her.\n\nIf your DM is that loose with what you can just have as starting gear, that’s cool and have fun. But it’s a bit insane.", "924" ], [ "A lot of the games I played as a kid or teenager are still very playable now. Dune 2, Monkey Island, Sensible Soccer, K240, Wings...\n\nChuckie Egg is not one of these. It’s bloody awful to go back to. For every game that stands the test of time, five hundred don’t. If you hear anyone saying that games were always better back whenever, they’ve got a very selective memory...", "921" ], [ "My grandma pushed to get me in from a very young age, thinking it’d be some sort of benefit. \n\nI lived on the streets and in homeless hostels, with people around me in various stages of addiction, mental illness, withdrawal and so on. But I can safely say that by far and away the biggest shower of extraordinarily slappable cunts I’ve ever met were at the two or three MENSA meet-ups I went to.\n\n & nbsp;\n\nThere was a magazine that I got every month or so. It had stories and puzzles in it, often submitted by members. One story summed up the entire MENSA experience for me:\n\nIt was about a girl’s 11th birthday. She was having a party at home instead of getting a present, but she didn’t have any money for a cake or party food. Walking down the street, she found a nice crisp £10 note. She took it home and memorised the serial number as it ‘slept’ on the pillow next to her. Let’s pretend the serial number was XB-1190-2808.\n\nThe following day, she took it to the shops and bought a cake and lots of party food - crisps, sausage rolls, jelly and ice cream. She told her parents that it was all thanks to her new friend XB-1190-2808. Her and her parents had a lovely time at her birthday party, and she went to bed very happy, where she said out of the window: “Thank you, XB-1190-2808. Thank you for the best party I could ever have wished for.”\n\n & nbsp;\n\nWhat a lovely story. Until you note that\n\n1. Her parents weren’t going to pay for the cake or party food\n\n2. They were happy to let her pay for her own party aged 11, which she only managed by sheer fortune at finding a tenner.\n\n3. No friends came to her party, nor did they ever seem to have been part of the plans.\n\n4. The friendless party that she paid for by herself was apparently her birthday present from her parents.\n\n5. She couldn’t think of any way that party could have been better. Such as friends or parents who weren’t arseholes.", "898" ], [ "My eldest nephew and I are close in age and he loves <PERSON> as much as I do.^^^Fnar.\n\nThe youngest one is 19 now and hates <PERSON> with a red hot vengeance. He calls it ‘*that shit you all like about those two closeted rapists’* and says anyone finding it funny should be on a government watchlist because they’re ‘not safe around women’. \n\nI get the whole edgy teen thing, but Jesus fuck, calm yer tits.", "282" ], [ "It’s a little over £21, which seems a fair price for a standard bit of kit.\n\nAs a random comparison, you could get a haircut for one and a tanner *(one shilling and sixpence, sixpence being half a shilling)* at this time, so the cheapest globes were the price of 13-and-a-bit haircuts. With my last haircut being £7, that’d work out a bit under £100 now, so it’s a good job we don’t use the haircut as a basis for inflation, like my grandad always did. “*Ooh, when I was a lad, for the price of a haircut you could...”*", "610" ], [ "Personally, I’m strongly against any nat1 result that disarms the player or breaks an item. Nat 1s happen regularly enough, especially in big fights, and the reasonably high chance here to lose or break weapons and armour that the player has worked hard for can put a real downer on things. I can see a lot of potential frustration.\n\nFor a nat 1, it’s obviously just a miss in standard gameplay, but I like to see it as a chance to add some flavour - maybe a crossbow bolt misses the enemy, ricochets around the room bouncing off the wall, the ceiling, someone’s shield, a dwarf has to duck it, the rogue has to jump over it, it whizzes past the wizard’s hat and lands with a plop at the feet of the orc the ranger was firing at. They both look down at it. They look up. A little embarrassed shrug, and the fight continues.\n\nEvery game is different though, and if it works for you (as it clearly does), that’s awesome :)", "924" ], [ "Interesting thing about Carry On - in Carry On Dick, <PERSON> has a good old roll around on a very nice old bed.\n\nThis bed belonged to a props company and was used in a few other programmes and films over the years. It was eventually auctioned off (after almost being lost, dumped by a skip in a hotel car park).\n\nThe auction buyer was very keen for it because he suspected it was older than it was being described as; in fact he thought it might be something that had been missing for a very long time. \n\nHe did some digging around and, long story short, not only is it an authentic Tudor bed, but it was the missing marital bed of <PERSON>, the bed in which <PERSON> was likely conceived.\n\nSo, if you ever watch Carry On Dick, you can see <PERSON> unknowingly rolling around in what is effectively <PERSON> wet spot.", "25" ], [ "Not much dramatic. I’ve got a big bag of cheese footballs to work my way through, but my main dilemma currently is **how to sort beads by size quickly**. I’ve got about 11kg of mixed beads I need to sort into size. \n\nI’ve looked at buying some stacking boxes and drilling holes of different sizes in the bottom of each one so I can just tip beads in and let them sort themselves as they fall through the stack. Main issues with this are:\n\n1. I can’t find any appropriate boxes that I can afford for it\n\n2. My drill is dead and has been since about 2002\n\n3. I am bloody awful at all forms of DIY.\n\nSo, it’s a good plan that is perfectly achievable except for every part of it.\n\nThis is mostly in anticipation of an influx of requests for the free bead boxes once the new thingy starts this week. \n\nI’ve switched up a bit so I’m now making [bead *bags* like this](_URL_0_), which have 5 items in instead of 7 and come in a large gift bag, which means postage is halved and I can get them out to more people I hope, ‘cos I suspect more people are gonna need them. Also, it can be a sort of stocking filler, I suppose. Either way, the number of requests has gone up month by month and it’s gonna go up a lot more, I think - this way, I get to cover everyone who asks without having issues. It’s good that people are enjoying them and passing on that they’re available :D\n\nBut fuck me, sorting beads is a right ballache.", "295" ], [ "Ta! I’m really bloody awful at DIY, I can’t do anything without bollocksing it up in some way. Safest way is just to not do any. Plus I’m not allowed to do anything in my flat anyway; took me two years to get them to agree to let me hang some sodding pictures up. \n\nThe battery doesn’t charge any more when I put it in the charger. The charger makes a rattling sound. I suspect my best option is just to buy a new drill whenever that becomes viable.\n\nIf I had any skill whatsoever, I could make a set of wooden sorting trays I’m imagining in a couple of hours. If I try, I’ll waste my money, hurt myself, and end up with...broken wood.", "309" ], [ "...wasn’t it a boy, not a girl? IIRC, he got to aid and survived, but sadly died from something while a young man. Might be thinking of something else completely.\n\n**Edit:** Nah, I was right.\n\n > In 2011, the child's father revealed the child was actually a boy, <PERSON>, and had been taken care of by the UN food aid station. <PERSON> had died four years prior, c. 2007, of \"fevers\", according to his family.", "288" ], [ "£20, but I was *incredibly* bloody lucky. I skipped over the lot a dozen times, because the guy was just selling a single comic for twenty quid, which was stupid.\n\nIn the end I went on a day or two later and looked at it, wondering what was so special about this one comic. Turned out to be a stack of between 150-200 comics, he’d just taken a picture of one of them, and nowhere in the title did it mention there was more than one. Never hit ‘buy it now’ so fast in me life. \n\nThere’s some still with the free gifts and everything. I’ve got a badge, several sets of sticks, some weird thing to go on a bike, a poster, and I’m hoping there’s more.\n\nIn general though, from watching them for a couple of months (wanted to buy some for my brother), you can get a decent stack of 50 or so for £20-30 if you keep an eye out.", "527" ], [ "‘So while we’ll shut down some businesses, we’ll keep schools, colleges and unis open to enable spreading, and also reclassify construction and manufacturing as essential workers, so that Mavis can get back to the factory where she has to make essential teapot stands. \n\nThen, in a month, when closing some things isn’t working and everyone is really pissed off, I’ll blame the public for wanting a lockdown and it not being helpful. If someone says ‘no, a *proper* fucking lockdown’, I’ll say something in Latin and fluffle my hair a bit.\n\nWhen nobody’s looking, I’m bloody well reopening the Commons bar, too. Can’t expect us to do this shut sober.’", "801" ], [ "The Amiga mags are definitely very very collectable, especially if they're Amiga Power or The One Amiga with the coverdisks. \n\nBasically though, eBay is your best bet. Job lots do really well, the more the better *up until a certain point*. But if you had, for example, a whole year's run of comics, they would be way more sellable. \n\nThe other bits I'm not sure about, but it might be worth auctioning things like the coins - might be worth an r/AskUK post about those?", "118" ], [ "The front cover has been running sponsorships disguised as strips for a fair while. Often they're to do with free gifts or competitions, but [this one from 1984 was for a new album by the bloody Krankies](_URL_0_).\n\nAs was mentioned too, there were ad-disguised-comics constantly - the pics I've taken of the '90-'95 comics have regular ones from Rice Krispies, Trio, Sodastream, Fiendish Feet, Choc Dippers, Wimpy, Captain Bubble drinks, stamp collections, Coco Pops, Lucky Charms, Chewits and more.", "484" ], [ "From a rough as fuck estate in the U.K. here; I feel much the same when I see people with doormats or hanging baskets. \n\nOutside my front door I have a tiny sensor light. I paid £2 for a pack of three, knowing they’d be nicked. First one was gone within three days, all three were gone within two weeks. \n\nI have more, but I just put them up in the winter and when I am expecting a delivery or something.\n\nA doormat wouldn’t last the weekend. Halloween decorations would be barely worth unpacking, you might as well just hand the box to the next person you see.", "62" ], [ "Exactly this. The house opposite has cameras, but they're attached to the upstairs bedroom windows. This is the only reason they've not been nicked.\n\nIf, however, they caught a tape of someone stealing something, it'd just be a case of \"ah, we can't see their faces\" if the police bothered to show up at all. \n\nThree or four years ago, a guy banged up on meth tried to kick my door in because he thought someone else lived here. This was about 3am, and I phoned the police. Still waiting for them to arrive. \n\n(FWIW, I later found out who it was because he came round to apologise. His mate was with him, and was trying to stop him doing it because he knew whoever it was didn't live here any more. I'm a very big bald dude with a more scary accent than the local one, and this guy is a very skinny snappable sort of twig. He apologised when his mate told him to, and it's all fine. We say hi on the street now, and he's looking much healthier these days so I'm hoping he's getting clean. Good results, really.)", "765" ], [ "Think of it from his perspective. There is no way he’s not going to tell all of his friends that he banged that woman. This happened during the time he was ‘abducted’. His mum is going to find out, either from him or (more likely) rumour and his friends.\n\nThe woman can protest, once the police track her down, but <PERSON> specifically kept the lights on so that he could see her nekkid. He can describe her body reeeeeally well; if she’s got a mole or mark anywhere secretive, that’ll be what puts her away for a long time.\n\nSure, she can try the ‘he only turned magically into an 11 year old boy in front of me after I dropped him off!!’ defence, but...well, that’s not going to help her much.", "741" ], [ "Yeah, to be fair my brother ruined it for me. We both loved the film when it came out in the ‘80s, and a year or so ago we decided to rewatch it on his suggestion.\n\nWhen it finished, there were many, many questions centred around ‘wait, what can possibly happen next?’ and how long until the woman is arrested. \n\nBut yeah, the sex scene isn’t really a sex scene; they start getting undressed, she turns the light off, <PERSON> turns it back on so he can see as he has a play with a boob, and that’s as much as it is before cutting away.\n\nBloody great film, though, and helped shape my thoughts about what being a kid in the US must be like (minus the magic).", "869" ], [ "Air travel is weird. Here in the U.K. it’s obscenely cheap and train travel is obscenely expensive, to the level that it’s far, far cheaper for me to fly from my city in the U.K. to Germany or France, then get another flight from there to the city my Mum lives in here in the U.K. \n\nThe last time I did it, it cost just over £39 return. The train would have been about £180 (**Edit: just looked it up; £166 if you go at very inconvenient times, £355 otherwise**). It’s a 4 hour journey, so between £40-£90/hr cost.\n\nCoach (as in a large bus, not flying coach class) would have cost £37.50, but would have taken over 13 hours.\n\nPre-Covid, if you had £20 and fancied visiting a European city, plane was about your only option. Obviously it’s all different now.", "780" ], [ "I’m currently doing a naked brutality cannibal run on the ice cap, decided to only allow cannibals to join.\n\nThe game provides pretty well; it seems desperate for me to have more colony members so I get a lot of refugee pod crashes. If they’re not a cannibal, their bed is a sleeping spot outside until the situation takes care of itself...\n\nKeeps me well stocked with man-meat and human leather, which is nice.", "326" ], [ "It’s *such* a weird thing to see from outside the US. \n\nIf it’s not a World Cup at the time or similar, seeing someone with an St. George’s cross flying at their house here in England gives you a reasonable idea what they’re going to be like without having to meet them.\n\nMy musical partner is originally from the US, and says the flag is a ‘temporary stand-in measure until we get some history’. How true that is, I dunno. Doesn’t seem it, but it’s not my country.", "744" ], [ "I feel your pain. I’ve currently got a really sore calf muscle and have been using Deep Relief freezing gel; about half an hour ago I got a bollock caught in me undies and dislodged it without thinking, right as I had just finished reapplying the gel. \n\nOnly regained feeling in the rogue spud a few minutes ago.", "893" ], [ "**Hi!!**\n\nCan't help noticing that you're parking your car facing the street rather than facing the house. It's our fault, we should have mentioned - we like to face the house. It's just a silly little thing; we think it looks more *homely* as you're facing the home rather than the road away from it!!!\n\nAnyway, if you can rectify this and continue this way going forward, we'd all be really happy - just as we would be if you could replace your net curtains with half-blinds, as a couple of people have mentioned in passing that they've said to you about it but we see you still have those less *homely* net curtains - I'm sure you've just not got round to it yet, and it was just a little mistake!!!! \n\n & nbsp;\n\nAnyway, fab to have you with us!!!!! Much love!!!!!!\n\n & nbsp;\n\n**PS:** You probably weren't told yet, but every second Wednesday we take it in turns to have an 'open home' so we can all get to know each other. This coming Wednesday is the turn of your beautiful little home!!!!!!! It's nothing fancy, but it *is* all day so you may have to take the day off work; a cold collation of select meats (NO PORK, number 18 is flatulent with pork) from the butcher in the village; some fresh baked rolls and bread, any cakes you happen to have in (home baked is best!!!!!!!!) and the usual teas, coffees, cold drinks, squash for the children and so on. Nothing to put yourself out over, it's very relaxed!!!!!!!!!.", "765" ], [ "Nah, I'm lucky. I live on a small island now, and the locals are fine with me not joining in with much - they have even offered me the starring role in their upcoming celebrations, which is very nice of them. I'm looking forward to that. \n\nMust dash, *another* two lorries delivering wicker have just pulled up onto my drive by mistake. Seems to be happening a lot this week, can't imagine who's ordering so much.", "355" ], [ "Not letting your player become an incredibly powerful immortal undead creature without working their absolute arse off for it isn't \"screwing him over\" or not letting him have fun, it's a perfectly reasonable response. Say no, stick to your guns, and then it's down to him. \n\nThink of it in the same way as if a player said \"hey, I know I'm a dragonborn - but now I'm gonna be an ancient red dragon. I'mma just add all of the abilities etc. of one of those.\"\n\nYou've been far, far more generous and reasonable than I would be, stick to your guns and if he ends up being pissed off and leaving because you won't let him become basically king of the undead with no work, then that's down to him. \n\nIf I was a player and that was allowed for another player at the table, I'd be reassessing making my character a storm giant or similar.", "445" ], [ "I’ve been having a lot of issues with sciatica these past couple of months; it’s gone from my back to my leg and is now localised in my calf. I’ve got deep treatment muscle rub that freezes it.\n\nToday, shortly after applying and before I could go and wash my hand, I caught a bollock in the side of my boxers and, without thinking, freed myself. \n\nThat was at about midday. It was tea time before I could properly feel my left spud again.", "893" ], [ "“Dear Madam,\n\nI’m writing to thank you for your letter regarding the placement and timing of my bins. It reminded me somewhat of my childhood, toddling at knee-height around the quiet dusty streets of Leeds in the late 1930s, men-folk starting to vacate to a war I didn’t know or understand. Those were the days, of course, when nobody noticed a little lad in a one-stripe woollen jumper, my chilly knees poking out from the bottom of the canvas shorts I’d somehow inherited from an unknown beneficiary, curiously engaged in searching for shiny bits of copper or tin to take home and proudly show Mother.\n\nGone are the days of my little canvas shorts, but I must advise that if you decide you’re going to notice me, and my bins, I’m going to set light to your fucking dahlias.\n\nYours ever,\n\n<PERSON>.”", "630" ], [ "The quickest way is probably going to be [Click & Drop](_URL_0_), if it’s not something super duper important and needs tracking etc.\n\nDon’t need to buy books of stamps, you can just print off a postage label yourself and pop it on the envelope, then it just goes in any post box.\n\nIf it’s just a normal letter or card, that comes under ‘letter’(65p second class), if it’s a padded envelope and under 100g weight then that’s a Large Letter (88p second / £1.15 first).\n\nWe all have to learn everything, should never be embarrassed to ask for help :)", "682" ], [ "To be honest, people complaining about ‘Americanisms’ like Fall and gotten is a mild annoyance for me, because (like soccer, too), they were words used here first, so it’s not an American import - fall is the shortening of ‘fall of the leaf’, which is the opposite to spring (itself a shortening of ‘spring of the stem / sap / bud / blood, depending on region), and we used it until shortly after the colonies were settled and then switched to autumn. Those overseas didn’t change, of course, so now people think it’s purely an American import. It’s a perfectly nice word, and I like it.\n\nYou do you, my dude, and all power to your elbow.", "157" ], [ "That last one especially pissed me off by proxy. But god, Christmas is an absolute ruiner to the ratings and feedback. A week before the last post, I start upgrading everyone to first class free to help them get through the mad rush, but still ended up with a refund request rate of about 20% this year because the item they ordered a day before the final post never arrived and now Christmas is spoilt and apparently that's my fault. \n\nA significant number of the ones I refunded messaged me at the start of Jan saying 'oh, it's just arrived', and I suspect all the rest arrived too. Harrrrumph.\n\nI do work every day, but it'd be nice if it wasn't *assumed* I do. I get a lot of messages early Saturday morning or Sunday afternoon, and if you don't respond within an hour or so you get a right moody message from some of them.", "691" ], [ "I suppose a mix of idealism and balls-out fronting it. They could knock him off in Germany, maybe he thinks he might as well just go back and front it out, daring it to happen, rather than spend the rest of his life looking over his shoulder.\n\nIt's obvious he also still has his political ambitions, so is presumably hoping to rally enough opposition to do something.", "29" ], [ "A petardier had two options when attaching his bomb to the gate or wall instructed. Either:\n\n* Wear extremely bulky armour and protection, causing you to move slowly. You were well protected from the arrows of defenders while you worked, and pretty well defended against the explosion if you didn’t *quite* get all the way back, but you ran the risk of injury by not being able to get far enough away in time...and if you fell, you were utterly fucked.\n\nOr\n\n* Wear very little to no armour and rely on speed. Plus side, you could get in and out extremely quickly with your petard, doing the damage and getting back very fast. On the negative...it only takes one arrow. Or worse, you’re hit and fall after lighting the petard - you have no chance. You’re going to be hoist by your own petard.", "864" ], [ "As a kid in the ‘80s, I had an Usborne book about the Lambton Worm, with the very distinctive art style of the illustrator whose name I don’t remember.\n\nAll that sticks in my mind is how damn *juicy* the worm looked, especially when it was being chopped in half near the end. It was shiny and glutinous and looked like it needed a damn good lick.", "630" ], [ "Mine’s not worked since the day I got it. The engineer warned me “it’ll work for half an hour, then you’ll get a network error and it’ll stay that way.” He said it was a known error that everyone was blaming on everyone else, affected a lot of people in the area, and there was no fix at that time. \n\nSure enough, it did. I called British Gas and said my electric smart meter had stopped working, so they sent an engineer to poke it. Different guy came, he brought a new one but said “it’ll work for half an hour and then stop”, which it did again. \n\nFast forward about four years to now, when I had the power board replaced in the flat. I thought that was a good time to come and get someone to prod the meter, because surely there’s a fix by now.\n\nBloke arrives with a new meter in tow, prods all of the stuff a bit and tells me “unfortunately it’ll only work for half an hour or so, then it’ll stop. It’s a known issue in the area.”\n\nGah.", "672" ], [ "The most famous bullshit merchant of it probably being <PERSON>, who used to charge between hundreds and thousands of dollars to look at either a photo or a cast of your arse, before spouting the usual bollocks that these charlatans do.\n\nIIRC from an interview she said she did it to help people who are too anxious to go and get their palm read. But apparently not too anxious to send a picture of their arse to <PERSON> mum.", "527" ], [ "Bloody love Big Country. I was just too young to go and see them when they were near me a little while before <PERSON> died, but I caught them about ten years ago when it was still <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON>’s son <PERSON>; I got <PERSON>’s set list from that one. It was good, but you’re always going to miss <PERSON>.\n\nThink <PERSON> left after that, and <PERSON> was sort of on-off. \n\nCan’t beat the old albums, though. I learned to place bass to Without The Aid Of A Safety Net, and The Crossing is my favourite album of all time.\n\n & nbsp;\n\nIf <PERSON> was in Runrig, wonder if he was in the episode of The Young Ones episode that I seem to remember having Runrig on? (Edit: Nope, it was Rip Rig + Panic, not Runrig.)", "788" ], [ "Long as they were actually dead and not tunnelling through into the house again as part of an elaborate heist plan, no reason to mind.\n\nI’d actively consider a gaff like this because of the lower price, like the areas in the US when they by law have to state openly if a house is haunted. The price is much lower if so, and I’ll happily go along with their delusions to save a third off the price.\n\nI’d want to know about the logistics, though. I assume people might want to come and pay their respects sometimes, which is fine, but I’d like a heads up. Also whether there’s anything I’m not meant to do; is the ground consecrated and as such is the vicar going to be grumpy if I’m lying in the garden with my moobs flopping about like hippos in clingfilm?", "765" ], [ "I find myself doing this (not to that extent, obviously) on Discord, and it’s because I type in the same fashion as I speak, separating the sentences or short chunks as I naturally would in speech.\n\nLike this.\n\nThis would have been three messages, but the second only came into my head after I’d sent the first, and this one after that.\n\nI do have a friend who sends one message at a time, and each is a mini-novel. You can watch him typing for ten minutes before anything arrives, and then it’s like having a newspaper delivered. \n\nAny extreme is a bit on the irritating side, but people have styles of typing that are extremely recognisable in the same way that their speech patterns are.", "1018" ], [ "Very random question, but I’ve got ten out of date tapas snack boxes being delivered at the weekend, and there was no description of what was in them. The box gave no clues as it was ‘de-identified’, so had most info blocked out.\n\nAny clues what I might expect? They’re down as a ‘tapas snack / lunch box for 1-2’, about the size of a hardback book, and were originally £2.99 each. \n\nBought them on a whim for lunches, but no idea what the heck tapas is and am skipping google for it so I can get some human interaction out of the query.", "783" ], [ "Sounds good though, and theoretically healthier than grabbing a burger or something.\n\nI’m hoping it’ll be like a dead posh version of a dairylea lunchable; from the picture I’m sure I can see the edge of a biscuitty looking thing. That’s just about make my week, discovering grown-up lunchables that aren’t wank.", "530" ], [ "Putting this here so I can check later, because I reckon I'm going to want to make basically everything that gets posted. \n\nLast time there was something similar a few years ago, someone showed us how to make flipping great giant trays of jammy sponge cake and a chocolate cake with chocolate custard.", "559" ], [ "Yeah!\n\nMy grandma used to make a brilliant one, a coconutty custardy jammy tart. It's so easy, but I just can't make it. Layer of shortcrust pastry cooked, then a layer of jam, then fillllll the tray up with custard, let it set in the fridge and sprinkle dessicated coconut on top. \n\nCan't make it like she did.", "559" ], [ "Nah it's actually something I thought about myself! I used to help her make it, and it was always Birds powder from the tin, and she used to get me to make it while she did other things, so I remember that part a bit more than normal. \n\nThe custard doesn't come out of tray, though - the whole thing was made in a fairly shallow glass oven dish. That had the pastry placed within (the pastry came up the edge, too, like a pie without a lid - that kept another layer between the custard and the glass). Then when the pastry was ready, the jam was put on, then the custard was poured in and left to cool. When cool, the coconut was sprinkled on and the whole thing - in the glass dish - went into the fridge overnight. \n\nWhen it came out, it was served cold, and was bloody amazing.", "559" ], [ "To be honest, for all I know, the jugs of custard I made when I was 8 were sneakily whipped away while I was distracted by a Beano and replaced with her 'proper' custard. There's just something about people who can cook expertly though, they make it all seem so effortless. \n\nI'm really tempted too, to be honest! I froze some milk yesterday, tempting to get it back out and give it a crack...", "559" ], [ "<PERSON> pulled off a second ‘final scene of Blackadder’ moment at the end of Upstart Crow. \n\nNot as good a series as Blackadder, of course (though they’re in the same universe, with <PERSON> appearing in both), but fuck me <PERSON> and <PERSON> were good in the last bit of the last episode. I realised what the series was probably heading towards a couple of episodes before the end, but didn’t expect to be made to Feel Things^TM .\n\nNothing like on the scale of Blackadder, of course; that’s an incredible finale. But it was still powerful.", "666" ], [ "I heard <PERSON> speak, and of course the first question in the Q & A started ‘Ah, <PERSON>...’ - he talked about the eye twitch, and how it just...stayed after filming. It took him about six months to get rid of it, and involved some form of therapy (that he didn’t specify) - he’d pretty much given himself a full-on nervous twitch by accident for the series.", "186" ], [ "There’s not really a whole lot that can be discussed about this; there’s a very firm no politics rule. \n\nAny decision must be made based on now and in the future, rather than the past. If people want it to remain, that’s fine and their efforts should be encouraged and supported where appropriate. But it’s not a vital tool of communication any more, whatever the reasons. We can’t bring back the dead who spoke it exclusively and have another go, without the historical unpleasantnesses, same as we can’t do the same with Old English once it was superseded. It’s not lost. There’s no reason why people shouldn’t be able to learn and continue to use the language, but it’s not a sole language to many - if, indeed, any.", "930" ], [ "You weren’t, so far as I can tell. It’s just different cultures, and that bloke being a bit of an arse.\n\nRealistically, not many people here who go digging into their family history are going to discover Scandinavian roots from the 9th century then decide to try learning the language. If you present someone with their results, they’ll probably say ‘oh, that’s nice’ and potter off to make a cuppa.\n\nHowever, non-native US citizens seem to like to know their history before their family’s emigration and embrace it much more dramatically, as if they were missing a part of themselves and want to be a part of it. We see it with people whose great-great-great-great grandparents came to the US from Kildare, so tell people they’re Irish. \n\nHonestly, my full family is like the It’s A Small World ride. We have bits of the family from the US (Pennsylvania), England, Ireland, Wales, St Lucia, Nigeria, New Zealand, Italy and other areas. The only guys who are even remotely interested in finding out about things like this is the Pennsylvanian chunk of us - the rest of us are just in the ‘oh, that’s cool. Anyone want tea?’ camp. \n\nNow it may well be just that the Americans in the family are this particular way - it’s a small sample size, after all - but there is certainly some truth in the adage that a hundred years is a long time in America, and a hundred miles is a long way in the U.K. - that is to say, the Pennsylvanian guys will go insanely orgasmic over finding a building 150 years old and want to know all about it and tell their friends and family, whereas we might live within walking distance of a dozen or two churches that are 500, 600 years old. On the other hand, they’ll casually mention they’re going to visit friends in the next state on a whim, we’ll look it up and think WHAT THE FFF... THAT’S LIKE HERE TO GERMANY ON A BLOODY WHIM, whereupon they just shrug and say ‘yeah?’ and get in the car.\n\nThat’s not to say either are correct or incorrect; it’s just...different.\n\nI guess what I’m saying (very long-windedly, apologies) is that there are very different cultures at play here. Not many people move too far here historically, and not many are really bothered about the languages or similar their ancestors may have spoken, outside of an ‘oh, that’s interesting’. \n\nIt’s cool that you’re excited by your family history, but prepare and temper your expectations in anticipation for vague indifference from people on the subject, even from those from the areas and who may once have historically spoken the language.", "5" ], [ "The character left the assassins guild to become a painter. You’ve got a solid plot hook for them right there, so I don’t see any reason why the player needs to come up with any other plot for you.\n\nDid they piss someone off? Fail a job? Get tired of it and just want out? Is someone likely to be coming after them, on the basis of tidying up ‘loose ends’? Are they protecting someone? Do they ‘know too much’? Or did they have some sort of crisis of conscience and need to get out and live a more peaceful and noble life? Is painting how they cope? Maybe they’ve joined the group for cover, for protection, or for convenience. \n\nYou have a **huge** amount to dig into there.", "326" ], [ "Easily. Just needs thinking about rather than dismissing.\n\nIf he’s hiding out with the party, then clearly something horrendous happened to make him leave the assassins guild. The painter thing is cover that he has to keep up. Someone must be after him, possibly because of something he did or something he knows - and someone powerful.\n\nOffhand and off the top of my head, I’d have his old assassins guild in absolute disarray as the top figures have been taken down / wiped out due to traitor/s within. \n\nThere’s even two ways you could play *that*, depending on preference. Either he was high up and fears he’s next on the list to be taken out, in which case you have someone hunting him *who’s powerful enough to wipe out the entire top hierarchy of an assassins guild* and scare others into fleeing (could have him coming across other old members who ran, alive or dead), or he could be the one who took them down - a minor cog in the machine who betrayed the guild for money or power. Consequently, the entire remainder of the guild is now after him.", "326" ], [ "May have accidentally^TM bought 5kg of mixed loose beads from someone on eBay. Fun times sorting those next week :D\n\nOoh, and my 9kg of sequins has arrived from Poland and is in Leicester. Hoping it’ll come tomorrow, but there’s always the outside chance it’ll be today...\n\nOther’n that, a chill day. Just finished work, time for sleeps. Have a lovely day everyone, give my regards to the earth’s atmosphere.", "355" ], [ "> Pumpkins have a high, natural affinity for magic. For very little magical input, a pumpkin farm can yield multiple, massive harvests all year long. Even children with magical power can assist pumpkin growth with just their magical aura.\n\nYou *are* talking about sort of...lore from the series, right?", "310" ], [ "It's set at the point where I'd have been in the same year as <PERSON> at school, so I just generally assume (based on my single reference point) he'd want all of the same sort of shit I wanted. Teenage Mutant Hero Turtles stuff. Beano annuals. Sodastream. Mr Frosty. An Amiga. Footie stickers. A satellite dish so you could make your mates envious that you get to watch The Simpsons...that was the ultimate goal.\n\nThough, to be honest, what he'd probably want first is 'not to live under some stairs'.", "630" ], [ "Not here in the UK. I was a teenager at the time, and while a couple of people at school had them and they were novel and interesting, most of us who had any kind of computer game system had an Amiga or Atari ST, or a C64 / Spectrum if you still had the older stuff. This was a pretty common formula around the country; if you had anything at all then it was much more likely Amiga/Atari/Speccy/C64 etc.\n\nIf you had an Amiga, for example, it was a no brainer with basically no reason at all to switch over. Far more in the way of marketing for the Amiga etc., more games, cheaper games, big name game series’, expandable and upgradeable, and there were more magazines available, each of which threw coverdisks crammed full of demos / free games at you. \n\nDemos and free games was a huge part of it. You could buy The One Amiga, Amiga Power, Amiga Action, Amiga Format and CU Amiga and walk away with demos for maybe ten major upcoming or existing games, with probably another ten full PD games and bits of software free, too. There were Nintendo mags that came out, but they didn’t come with two or three free cartridges stuck to the front each month.^1\n\nNintendo didn’t market well over here. The NES was very much on the sidelines.\n\n & nbsp;\n\n^1 As an example, in the **June 1994** issue of **Amiga Power**, on two coverdisks you got the following:\n\n* Atom Smasher\t (PD Full game)\t\n\t\n* Strikes 'N' Spares\t(PD Full game)\t\t\n* Super Obliteration\t(PD Full game)\t\t\n* Vector Battleground\t(PD Full game)\t\t\n* Crash Test Dummies\t(Demo)\t\n\n* Racing Maniacs\t(PD Full game)\t\t\n* Syndicate: American Revolt\n(Never-seen-before add-on mission for Bullfrog's ‘Syndicate’)\n\nThe same month, if you bought **The One Amiga**, you got:\n\n* Armour-Geddon 2 (Demo)\t\n\n* Digger\t(PD Full game)\t\n\n* Touch 'n' Go (PD Demo)\t\n\n* Gulp!\t(Demo)\t\n\n* Kung Fu Charlies\t (PD Full game)\n\nSo if you were lucky enough to get both mags, that month you got 7 full games, 4 demos and an expansion for a major game. Not too shabby.\n\n**Amiga Action** had two demos on two disks that month (Puggsy, Rugby League Magnager).\n\n**Amiga Format** had four disks containing 8 full graphics, fx and other utility programs, two full PD games (Dieserzug and Asteroids), and a demo of the excellent **Dreamweb**, which is basically the original **Hotline Miami**. \n\n**CU Amiga** had three coverdisks with some free video editing software plus three game demos (Statix, Sierra Soccer, Tactical Manager).\n\nBeing immensely rich and getting all 5 mags in June 1994 would have netted you 13 coverdisks with 9 full games, 9 full free utility/editing bits of software, a game expansion and demos of 10 games. Mind you, getting that many mags would have meant everyone wanting to come to your house after school to play them.", "628" ], [ "A stack of three makes sense, you could have them loading different tapes so you didn’t have to wait half an hour after playing Chuckie Egg...\n\nSkool Daze & Back 2 Skool were ones I never managed to work out. I’ve seen a longplay of Back 2 Skool and it’s no wonder I never worked it out, there’s a lot of complicated stuff that you’re not told about in the manual.", "628" ], [ "Never found it an issue. Might be an age thing; I grew up playing games that took 30mins or more to load from tape and were basic ‘lose three lives and game over, start again from the beginning’ types.\n\nIf you grow up just accepting that sort of thing as ‘just how games are’, then as loading times shorten and games improve dramatically in terms of gameplay but also allowing saving, level codes, checkpoints and allowing you as many goes to complete it as you need, I think you’re only going to get more patient and chill. \n\nI dunno, I was in my 30s before I met someone with a proper gaming anger problem (my ex), and she scared the shit out of me with it. It just never really registered as a thing before. My siblings are the same.", "265" ], [ "Ehhhh, I absolutely adore the Amiga and will always defend it, but I think they’re very very optimistic and looking back through rose-tinted glasses.\n\nI have an emulated Amiga set up with pretty much every game ever released, including most of the independent PD games. Over the last five years I’ve been going through them all, making notes of hidden treasures - we all know the groundbreaking games, some series of which are still around today *(Worns, Civilization, The Settlers, Lemmings, Theme Park, Sensible Soccer, Theme Hospital, Dune 2 which invented the RTS genre etc)*, but there’s also some amazing games that never really had the huge limelight they deserved.\n\nHowever, those are few and far between. What I discover every day is yet more handfuls of absolute and total wank. Games that make no sense (WHY does water kill <PERSON> - he’s a duck!), games that just don’t explain what you’re meant to be doing either in game or in the manual, games that are boring as hell with nothing happening, games that put 100% into graphics and 0 into gameplay (Rise of the Robots), games that are otherwise great but punish you hard for things you had no way of knowing (Wizkid), so so many games that are just there to show pixelated boobs, and games that are fantastic but the technical limitations meant it was flawed (UFO: Enemy Unknown, the first game in the X-COM series, where you could easily wait 20-30mins for the enemy to move on each of its turns).\n\nSo yeah, there were amazing games that hold wonderful memories, but there are similarly amazing games today too. You can’t really compare the two, but since today’s PC system means you can have your game but also pay a video or music or audiobook in the background, flick between those and spreadsheets, your pics and vids etc effortlessly...well, the modern is really the only way to go *except* for those very few who can’t accept it. You can love the old stuff but be realistic about other newer systems just being comparatively better on the whole. The old great games are still around; I often play Wings or K240. But we’ve moved on.", "369" ], [ "I’ve confused myself even more, tbh, especially since I didn’t ask a question but I’ve apparently answered one anyway. I don’t drink coffee, and didn’t realise there were multiple different ones you put ice in. I don’t know what one my sister in law drinks; she makes it with the kettle, rams a handful of ice cubes into the travel mug, screws the lid on and buggers off to work. \n\nIs that iced coffee or coffee with ice? Is there a third alternative? Who are we and why are we here? What happened to all of my pen lids? Why do I need a nap?", "1002" ], [ "> **Product description:** Our chief buyer had the idea of making classic British biscuits whilst trying to keep his mind off an insanely dangerous journey across Southern China with his boss, and we love it! \n\nThis is a bloody weird start to a product description. Normally they just say ‘3pcs, plastic, random colour’ or similar.\n\nReminds me of those recipes you sometimes come across where you think ‘I fancy making that’, but it starts with four pages of:\n\n ‘*Well, since becoming a Mumma for the THIRD time (shout out to <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON>!), Darling Cheri (epic yoga instructor! link at bottom) suggested I needed some real me-time. Cue an impromptu trip to the Guatemalan wilds!!! Here I met <PERSON> and <PERSON>, a sky-couple from Wapping, and it was probably an hour into our three-way (see full album for £19.95 below, you naughty sausages!) that I had the idea of putting the beans ON TOP OF SOME TOAST! So I wiped my face clean of the gloopier of our extrusions, and set out for the nearest Waitrose.’*", "406" ], [ "You can tell <PERSON> that the ‘it’s illegal to die in the Houses of Parliament’ one is wrong, unfortunately. It’s a bit of a myth.\n\n\n & nbsp;\n\n**It is illegal to die in Parliament**. \n\nTrue? **No.**\n\nThe issue of dying in Parliament appears to arise from the idea that anyone who dies in a Royal Palace is eligible for a state funeral. We have not been able to trace any such law, and neither have the House of Commons authorities. \n\nUnder the Coroners Act 1988, the coroner of the Queen's household has jurisdiction over an inquest into a death in a royal palace. However, state funerals are not mandatory.\n\n\nThere have been at least four deaths in the grounds of the Palace of Westminster:\n\n- <PERSON> and Sir <PERSON> were both executed in the Old Palace yard (the present buildings being the New Palace, built after the fire of 1834).\n\n- <PERSON>, the only British Prime Minister to be assassinated, was shot and died in the lobby of the House of Commons in 1812.\n\n- Sir <PERSON> collapsed and died in the House of Commons ‘Aye’ lobby in 1907, while casting his vote on a sugar duty Bill.\n\nNone of these men received a state funeral. <PERSON> was a private funeral at his widow's request.\n\n[Source](_URL_0_)\n\n & nbsp;\n\n_____\n\n & nbsp;\n\n**Similarly, the shooting a Scotsman is also very definitely untrue.**\n\n*It is illegal to shoot a Welsh or Scottish (or any other) person regardless of the day, location or choice of weaponry.*\n\n*The idea that it may once have been allowed in Chester appears to arise from a reputed City Ordinance of 1403, passed in response to the Glyndŵr Rising, and imposing a curfew on Welshmen in the city. However, it is not even clear that this Ordinance ever existed. Sources for the other cities are unclear; Hereford, like Chester, was frequently under attack from Wales during the medieval period.*\n\n*Unlawful killings are today covered by the criminal law.*\n\n & nbsp;\n\n______\n\n & nbsp;\n\nThe fun part is those which are very much true.\n\n **It is illegal to beat or shake any carpet or rug in any street. However, beating or shaking a doormat is allowed before 8am.** \n\nTrue? **Yes**. \n\nThis is an offence under s 60 of the Metropolitan Police Act 1839. In other districts, it is an offence under s 28 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847. Other offences covered by s 28 include:\n- keeping a pigsty in front of your house;\n- slaughtering cattle in the street;\r3\n- erecting a washing line across the street;\n- singing profane or obscene songs or ballads in the street; and\n- **wilfully and wantonly disturbing people by ringing their doorbells or knocking at their doors.** (This also covers the knock-down <PERSON> one)\n\nAnd\n\n**It is illegal to handle salmon in suspicious circumstances.**\n\rTrue? **Yes**\n\rThis is an offence under the Salmon Act 1986.", "903" ], [ "The Royal Mail seems to be having massive issues right now in some areas. \n\nI sell buttons/beads/sequins online. The number of customers I’ve been contacted by recently saying their parcels haven’t arrived is unprecedented; I’ve had about three times more missing item complaints in the past month than the whole of the previous five years combined.", "682" ], [ "<PERSON> is a bloody treasure and I love him to bits.\n\nMy sister is non-verbal with severe and complex needs, and uses Makaton sign language. For the past 25 years or so she’s enjoyed kids VHS tapes that involve signing, a huge number of which are by <PERSON> <PERSON> also did a lot of charity events, a few of which we were able to get to.\n\nHe’s made my sister happy and engaging for most of her life, and he’s one of the few people she recognises outside of the family. He’s a bloody diamond.", "25" ], [ "That's what you do. Put it on the conveyor belt, then as it's scanned put it straight back in the trolley/basket, then take that over to the packing shelf and sort it into your shopping bags. It's to keep the things speedy for the till operator, rather than anything to do with convenience for the shopper - it's one of the ways they keep prices down. \n\nIt's the people who get their bags out ready and try packing it into the bags at the till who hold it up for everyone else. They also usually say 'I don't hold anyone up, I can pack quickly!', but yes, yes they do hold it up. \n\nI'm about the only person in my immediate family who hasn't worked at either Aldi or Lidl (I did the Co-op instead), so I've never experienced the whole thing about needing a minimum scanning rate or you get in trouble (and people packing at the till holds that up, because you have to wait). The Co-op didn't care, they just used to pay much much less than Aldi/Lidl.", "616" ], [ "**Story time!** \n\nI once met <PERSON>; in fact **she probably saved my life - and my brother’s**.\n\n & nbsp;\n\nI was only a toddler, and our garden had a wall that separated the garden from a drop of about 12 feet to the road behind the house. My brother and I were playing, and him being older, he decided we should play walking on the wall, despite <PERSON> telling us we weren’t ever to do so.\n\n\nMy balance has always been bad, and all I remember is slipping and grabbing my brother’s leg as I went. We both landed remarkably intact in the long hedge next to the road below, with the road there and no way of getting back up. The idea of walking around didn’t really come into our minds for some reason, but we couldn’t reach the wall to climb back into our garden - it was like the wall of a citadel at that age, and even now as an adult, at about ten feet high it’s pretty imposing.\n\n & nbsp; \n\nAnyway, we’re doing what comes naturally - crying in the hedge - when we hear a car pulling to a stop. A nice lady climbed out of the back along with the driver, and she tottered over in heels to comfort us. She told us her name was <PERSON>, asked our names, kept us talking and calmed us down enough to explain what had happened. \n\n\n\nThe driver had reversed the car right up to the wall next to us at this point, and we got out of the hedge and were helped onto the car by the driver as <PERSON> climbed onto the back of the car (still in the heels, I remember). \n\nThe driver passed myself and my brother up to her, and she was able to reach up with us and help first my brother and then me to get back over the wall into our very own garden. \n\n & nbsp;\n\nWe shot back down the garden to the house, where my brother made me promise never to tell <PERSON>. But I’ve always had a happy, warm fondness for <PERSON> ever since, as does my brother. I’ve no doubt she’d get on that car in high heels for anyone. After all, <PERSON> lifts us up where we belong.", "980" ], [ "What edition are you playing? You don’t go into negative HP in 5e, you’re into death saves at that point and attacks are simply two failed death saves as a crit against a downed opponent.\n\nFor a straight kill, an attack has to do over their max HP at this point, and it’s not cumulative. If you think about it, it -can’t- be cumulative, since each attack would be two failed death saves, and they die at three anyway.", "345" ], [ "Let’s assume you have 12hp as max. \n\n* Creature hits because you’re downed. You roll damage *in case* it’s more than your max and thus kills you, but in this case it turns out to be, say, 6hp damage with auto-crit.\n\n* This *becomes* two failed death saves, but the 6hp damage isn’t ‘saved’ or tallied - it’s just *become* two fails.\n\n* If creature attacks again, they still need to exceed your max to kill you outright, regardless of that initial 6hp - another 7hp won’t translate to enough for an instant kill.\n\n* However, the fact that you’ve been hit again *does* mean you’ll die, because you’re then taking another two failed death saves and are very, very dead. You can roll damage to add flavour, but it’ll be the failed saves that kill you, not the 7hp damage.\n\n* If you’re stabilised or healed after the first time you go down, you don’t start on -5hp, as that damage was converted into failed death saves, which were nullified by stabilisation or healing. So, you’re either stable on 0hp or back up with whatever healing you got.\n\nHope that helps!", "991" ], [ "Reading some of the comments [on this reporting of the story](_URL_0_) really makes me despair. So many people agreeing with the mayor, smugly pointing out that they have supplies, water and generators for their families so, basically, everyone who doesn't can just happily die off and leave the few like them. \n\nEven when confronted with things like the 10yr-old who died of carbon monoxide poisoning, they just say that if the family can't deal with a heater, they should really expect such things. \n\nAbsolute fucking cuntbags. I'm glad there's an ocean between me and them.", "270" ], [ "Maybe the USA should stop cutting bits of baby boy's dicks off for non-medical reasons. \n\nThe regular reason of *\"it's cleaner!\"* is absolute bollocks that tells you plenty about that person. Washing your cock doesn't take an extra hour a day if you have a foreskin; you don't have to grind the smeg out with a spoon. You just *wash your body*. The people who say *\"but it's cleaner!\"* are the people who clearly wash so infrequently that a yoghurt pot full of smeg built up around their helmet would be a real possibility if it wasn't taken away from them. \n\nIt's not hard. Wash your cock. Don't chop bits off other people's without good medical reasoning.", "451" ] ]
260
[ 12452, 15667, 15673, 4860, 7358, 20566, 562, 19462, 20732, 16596, 23076, 22073, 15525, 708, 16553, 17793, 6479, 16398, 16010, 9867, 15111, 19821, 12561, 11390, 4522, 24296, 11128, 19349, 15398, 5558, 9798, 15524, 16940, 231, 1178, 19149, 8655, 318, 4141, 23827, 22313, 8512, 15390, 1009, 13788, 3835, 12132, 335, 16395, 11301, 8678, 16714, 15018, 9713, 15521, 1138, 15472, 17462, 19036, 21129, 14138, 439, 24564, 10455, 6366, 16338, 5462, 3734, 23419, 13794, 7973, 16783, 21835, 16328, 3268, 24719, 9576, 1030, 1698, 4314, 16823, 11022, 12399, 12630, 10292, 14491, 16795, 16636, 10504, 25212, 6337, 18201, 12153, 24615, 682, 19590, 5168, 2525, 709, 2370, 23230, 9412, 12876, 9256, 8521, 20040, 16307, 4928, 1999, 24685, 8419, 13980, 23758, 8364, 7751, 7039, 18636, 22277, 24831, 5381, 10610, 6167, 14609, 16370, 1136, 9551, 2493, 21883, 6657, 18705, 16691, 10399, 10055, 23478, 18893, 21951, 10411, 21864, 1581, 952, 16361, 2331, 2036, 6197, 18000, 5292, 17523, 1924, 18668, 7785, 9496, 23991, 1962, 21398, 9899, 5015, 2339, 18039, 3339, 10586, 23465, 17176, 5374, 10373, 360, 10039, 10580, 19293, 8286, 12720, 12991, 12706, 12696, 21067, 11950, 11123, 14857, 23296, 14153, 24624, 25497, 17791, 1648, 2639, 21087, 8436, 10506, 20791, 21373, 16374, 21479, 12443, 12612, 14133, 15582, 16880, 13068, 10360, 16429, 17145, 16194, 3478, 16401, 19707, 24658, 23308, 13390, 24444, 1515, 15669, 25185, 22257, 13969, 22078, 19589, 11206, 6010, 9140, 18281, 25094, 5139, 20844, 407, 6336, 13214, 6500, 18952, 16903, 20312, 10632, 22883, 8447, 1649, 7441, 970, 4348, 10094, 8667, 19285, 18502, 2705, 10265, 5719, 15426, 7070, 11909, 6400, 23390, 12152, 21069, 9629, 7927, 582, 6022, 2922, 16962, 22808, 19723, 20277, 8052, 5972, 2217, 21972, 10619, 11204, 550, 25446, 11099, 24630, 6360, 5533, 1832, 25382, 18921, 3795, 12292, 506, 14265, 20189, 14391, 20569, 11189, 24929, 16376, 10859, 17409, 21328, 11389, 16408, 4681, 23101, 21500, 20166, 23445, 12811, 11232, 8777, 6048, 3363, 13357, 6441, 19508, 19692, 25014, 14266, 236, 20876, 20487, 249, 17897, 4377, 21245, 22117, 7218, 24230, 9460, 11569, 7864, 9598, 13662, 12660, 3140, 24494, 6785, 21687, 18641, 4144, 3955, 4980, 10008, 16113, 10384, 18775, 883, 14954, 20795, 3117, 13117, 19857, 1550, 10032, 12598, 7374, 14823, 25465, 3213, 13769, 11425, 4952, 20510, 18563, 13469, 1609, 14730, 18101, 14698, 5687, 2630, 10654, 11203, 4611, 18716, 2239, 11494, 1931, 21195, 13074, 4666, 7780, 11597, 16310, 24004, 3360, 7213, 649, 18440, 25103, 21717, 10076, 23896, 2347, 20740, 21538, 8878, 4218, 9879, 16503, 23426, 16928, 227, 25448, 22038, 866, 2670, 2931, 8608, 16351, 14215, 9864, 15210, 22702, 450, 642, 8853, 19800, 15545, 7324, 3116, 16860, 13849, 13153, 19099, 19224, 20661, 24472, 17833, 7054, 18938, 12629, 14726, 10581, 20403, 3470, 22501, 13920, 14963, 8657, 18868, 16255, 2745, 12534, 21865, 17977, 6556, 22187, 10839, 17814, 17005, 4430, 10548, 22967, 19667, 12154, 7173, 9193, 25289, 19649, 15422, 10124, 22594, 6585, 18235, 5246, 10519, 18906, 7980, 1920, 9582, 24400, 17646, 8282, 21495, 5394, 14241, 8516, 7017, 17327, 23304, 17799, 1451, 4527, 13145, 19173, 15159, 96, 23306, 7252, 2555, 24787, 23472, 18338, 23147, 7567, 6108, 10337, 10121, 2636, 9497, 12070, 19079, 1987, 17874, 16885, 9568, 24142, 1297, 4509, 13664, 16939 ]
reddit_dump_-SandorClegane-
[ [ "I'll take it a step further and give <PERSON> credit for his role in the process. I don't have to like it, agree with it or even believe he did anything calculated. \n\nIf this actually comes to fruition and anything he did influenced it, he deserves credit. I'm not a Republican, so I have no problem praising an action by \"the other side\" that yields a positive result. They're the ones that seem to have an issue giving \"dumbocrats\" a pat on the back for a goddamn thing.", "856" ], [ "I'm happy for him. It may not seem like it, but this is really the ideal situation for a player like him at this point in his career. I don't see his situation being much different than <PERSON>'s (although, <PERSON> is still a world class player IMO).\n\nThe MLS catches a lot of shit for being subpar and/or a retirement league. \n\nThe \"subpar\" argument is totally valid. It's hard watching EPL on Saturday / Sunday morning and La Liga in the early afternoon without cringing in the evenings while watching the MLS games. The talent level is worlds apart. A lot of it has to do with the whole pay-to-play system we've got going on, but that's a separate conversation.\n\nThe \"retirement league\" thing isn't something I see as so much of a negative. The fans here aren't going to threaten your life if you miss a PK or fall down on defense. Some of the older players who have come to MLS seem to find a new love of the game and the fans recognize it. \n\nThe game is growing in popularity in the US and being an ambassador for it isn't such a bad thing. I hope <PERSON>'s stateside stint is a positive experience for him and is enough of a good thing to overcome the disappointment I'm sure he feels not being the superstar in his home country he once was.", "555" ], [ "<PERSON> probably isn't the BEST comparison because he's kind of anomaly. His talent seemed to peak at an age when most other players start to lose it. \n\nThe things <PERSON> still has that I think will really stand out in MLS are his shot accuracy and his passing. It's tough to find players in this league that are consistently accurate on set pieces. His legs might be gone, but if he gets used in a sway that utilizes what he can still do at a world class level, I think he can still make a big splash. \n\nHopefully, <PERSON> doesn't do what <PERSON> did and put him at CM where he has to track back on defense for 90 minutes.", "820" ], [ "Not defending <PERSON> or his music, but...\n\nHere's a list of just a handful of musical artists that have been arrested, admitted to or been accused of battering women:\n\n- Pretty much all of Guns n' Roses\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- **<PERSON>**\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON>...with one arm, no less.\n\n- <PERSON> (obviously)\n\n- <PERSON>\n\n- Tone Loc\n\nStart cleaning our your music collection, folks.", "419" ], [ "Often times, people are much more comfortable being someone else than they are being themselves.\n\nOnline interactions make this kind of thing pretty easy and A LOT of people do it.\n\nIf you are specifically talking about men posing as women and engaging in romantic or sexual conversations with other men who believe them to be women...???\n\nI don't know. Is it the thrill of deceit? Do they like the attention? Are they exploring their own sexuality? \n\nThe answer might not be the same for everyone, but I agree it is a very interesting phenomenon. \n\nI'd also be curious if there is a significant number of women who do this. If so, how do their motivations compare to that of the men?\n\nTo be clear, none of the above is meant to include transpeople.\n\nThe internet is (in all likelihood) the first place where they feel they can be their true self. In that sense, they aren't really \"posing\" as anything regardless of their biological gender. I'll assume this question excludes that segment of the population (as it rightly should).", "640" ], [ "<PERSON> has used custom-manufactured cable routing by Whirlwind. He uses four electronic pedals for his left foot to ~~play the pieces~~ **throw the punches at his wife** he used to ~~play~~ **throw** with his left arm, which ~~from left to right trigger sounds of a closing hi-hat, bass drum, snare drum, and a tom drum~~ **still give him a solid 1-2 combo**.", "481" ], [ "What we call body odor is actually hexanoic acid gas. It is a waste product produced by lipophilic diphtheroids that feed on the protein rich sweat excreted from our axillary and pubic sweat glands.\n\nThese areas of the body have clusters of lymph nodes that process the waste from our cardiopulmonary and digestive processes, so they are much more nutrient rich than the sweat that is excreted elsewhere.", "982" ], [ "I don't think there would be a correlation there. \n\nWe're talking about waste produced by the major organs. Your digestive system is still handling all the protein you ingest. If someone was consuming massive amounts of protein far in excess of what their body needed, they would just shit it out. The things a person eats can and do affect how they smell, but to a far lesser degree than other factors.\n\nIn general, you can make yourself smell worse by causing your major organs to work harder. That's part of the reason why people sweat a lot when they exercise. In addition to the excess heat the body is generating, the heart and lungs are also producing more waste.\n\nThe excretory system in general is very interesting and complex. One of the most interesting (and probably least understood) aspects is how it works in conjunction with the endocrine system (hormones and sexy pheromones). This relationship seems to have much greater influence on how you smell than diet alone.\n\nWhen people fall in love, they tend to enjoy (or at least be more tolerant of) their lover's unique stink. \n\nDiabetics will actually smell sweet when they are having insulin issues and the body starts sweating excess sugars.\n\nI'm getting out of my depth here and can't really speak intelligently on how it all works, so I won't try.", "956" ], [ "Agree. \n\nGood example might be \"Killing Me Softly\".\n\n<PERSON> wrote and recorded it back in the 1970's. It was popular at the time, but not really considered a massive hit. \n\nRadio tends to stick to top 5 charting songs in their rotation, so it wasn't heard by a lot of millenials (I'm sure many of us did though, please don't issue a correction just because you heard <PERSON>'s version first).\n\nThe Fugees come along and do a cover that is hugely popular. <PERSON> voice sounds much better to most of us. Aside from being a great vocalist, her version is the most likely the first time we heard the song.", "213" ], [ "My paternal grandfather died when my dad was 14.\n\nI think it made it difficult for him to relate to his male peers and he became something of a loner. Even now, he socializes and can be very outgoing, but he really seems to prefer solitude in his downtime. \n\nMy theory is he missed some guidance and reassurance he would have gotten from his dad during that critical time when he was \"becoming a man\". He didn't have the ability to form bonds with other men and develop close friendships. Maybe the prospect made him anxious. Being alone was more comfortable for him.\n\nHe has no problem developing these kind of relationships with women, so I've got to think the dead dad thing is big factor here.\n\nHe's a good dad though. I'll give him credit for overcoming his personal tragedy and developing into a quality parent.", "981" ], [ "Yeah, that's gotta be tough.\n\nJust knowing you've got a dad around is kind of psychological security blanket. Even though I did't have the same close relationship with my dad that my sisters did, he'd still be my one phone call if I got arrested or something. \n\nJust knowing I had that kind of back-up if I fucked up or something probably gave me more confidence in general. That confidence is probably what makes it easier to form male / male relationships since men tend to be very competitive with each other.\n\nHope you're doing okay overall. I wouldn't worry too much about this kind of thing. It is what it is. Accept who you are, be grateful for what you have and don't let other people dictate your happiness.", "502" ], [ "I'm going with <PERSON> for practical reasons. \n\nHe's been fighting at heavyweight for years and DC hasn't. DC is used to manhandling guys at 205 and fighting <PERSON> will be one of the few times he won't necessarily be able to overwhelm his opponent with raw power.\n\nThe other thing is speed. He's known for being deceptively fast at LHW and I'm not so sure the 240 pound version will be at the same level.\n\nI could be totally wrong though. Both of these guys are champs and they didn't get there by losing fights. We'll probably get a boring first round with a lot \"mutually respectful\" jabs and feints. Anything that happens after that wouldn't surprise me. They're both pure class.", "252" ], [ "If it happens, just do the following:\n\n- Pull the power plug (or pop the battery out if it's a laptop).\n\n- Reboot\n\n- Choose \"Start Windows Normally\" Option on the Blue screen that pops up \n\n- Go to Control Panel and select \"Show Hidden Files\" under folder options.\n\n- Go to your C:\\ drive in file explorer and search for \"System32\"\n\n- Delete every file and folder with that name\n\nYou computer is now fixed.", "653" ], [ "gf is prego\n\nwe like to get kinky anyways\n\none night things get particularly saucy\n\ni'm sticking my noodle in her when I notice weird fucking chunks coming out, so I turn on the lights\n\nwtf it's red everywhere and she's obviously not on her period\n\ni look up at her, she's got a glassy, jarred look on her face and she's not answering\n\nohshitohshitohshitohshit\n\ni rush her into my car and speed all the way to the hospital\n\nshe's still bleeding everywhere\n\nby the time we get there, she's not bleeding much anymore, but all the color has drained and she looks colorless and almost transparent\n\noh shit, she looks like she's in a vegetative state\n\nstorm into to the emergency room, cary her to the nearest doctor and explain eveything\n\nhe takes one look at <PERSON> and says\n\n\"sir, i'm sorry, there's nothing we can do\"\n\n\"WHY THE FUCK NOT???\"\n\n\"we don't operate on empty jars of spaghetti sauce\"", "481" ], [ "My dad handled a lot of VIP security at a certain magical place in Central Florida back in the early 90's. He would typically be spending the day with the VIP versus just having a brief run-in with them, so he had a little more time to form an opinion.\n\nAccording to him, <PERSON> was the nicest. <PERSON> / <PERSON> (married at the time) were total asshats.", "898" ], [ "*I'm about to go /r/asoif on that ass...*\n\n*EDIT: To add TL;DR below the great wall of text*\n\nI get what you're saying, but I think if you look at it with some historical context, I think it's an easier pill to swallow.\n\n<PERSON>'s Conquest was only possible for three reasons: \n\n1. He has dragon. \n\n2. He has another dragon. \n\n3. He has yet another only this time fucking HUGE Dragon.\n\nTo borrow an expression from Alt-Shift-X, it's the ultimate trump card and the Targaryens are the only ones holding it. <PERSON> knelt before <PERSON> rather than seeing his people slaughtered. 500 years later, the people of the North still refer to him as \"The King Who Knelt\".\n\nAlong comes <PERSON>. For all intents and purposes, he is a Stark. He was born to a <PERSON>, he was raised by a <PERSON> and comes to be recognized as a <PERSON> even though he is a bastard. He restores Northern pride under <PERSON> banners. He manages to do this while simultaneously being a bastard.\n\nNow here comes the Dragon Queen who wants everyone to kneel or die. The alliance with <PERSON> is made under the assumption he is a <PERSON> bastard. When the Night King and <PERSON> are defeated, <PERSON> will have made it to the top of the foodchain answering only to one person: his queen. \n\nWhy does she get the top spot instead of <PERSON>? <PERSON> - Dragons - Trump card.\n\nIf a meteor hits <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON> and no one ever find out about <PERSON>'s true parentage, he still achieved more than any Stark had in 500 years. Yeah sure, he has to kneel to one person from time to time, but he gets to eat her ass right after that, so not that big a deal. \n\nWhen the time comes for <PERSON> to play HIS trump card, the only person he's defeating with it is <PERSON>. The Northern Lords aren't going to bail because <PERSON> is still a Stark, now legitimized, so even better. <PERSON> isn't going to kneel just because <PERSON> turned out to be a Dragonisto. She's still going to burn KL to the fucking ground. <PERSON> is pretty gay for <PERSON> already and they've got that bastard bro thing going on. \n\nThe \"rightful king\" thing serves no other purpose than to have <PERSON> willingly step aside (and probably get her <PERSON> on). <PERSON> being <PERSON> is just the means by which the ultimate trump card gets trumped because he can do the dragon (and incest) thing, too.\n\nSo what are we left with? Yeah, it kind of sucks that the bastard that rose to such great heights actually was the rightful king all along. How tropey. \n\nHere's the critical thing to remember: \n\n**<PERSON> never would have lived his life as a bastard if his father was someone other than <PERSON>.** \n\n<PERSON> wouldn't have had to sacrifice his honor to protect him. He would have been <PERSON>'s legitimate son and sat at the big table with is cousins as an equal (or been head of his own house depending on who his father was).\n\nIf you still don't like it, consider all of the other characters in the story that became more than their circumstances would predict. <PERSON>, the dwarf. <PERSON>, the scarred mercenary, <PERSON> and <PERSON>, the slaves, <PERSON> \"the beauty\", etc.\n\nLike I said, I understand wanting the underdog hero to have earned his place at the top. In my eyes, he has. The \"rightful king\" thing he's had in his back pocket this whole time has been far more of burden than anything else and when he finally has to play it, it's probably going to hurt him some more.\n\n**TL;DR** <PERSON>'s success is due far more to him being a bastard than it is to him being a secret Targ.", "475" ], [ "> DC has manhandled every heavyweight he has ever fought. \n\nIt's been almost 5 years since he's fought at HW.\n\nI just meant he's gotten used to fighting guys smaller than <PERSON> and that might have an impact on his performance.\n\n > He overhead slammed 250lb <PERSON>.\n\nIf he does that to <PERSON>, I will go get a job at Taco Bell and never visit this sub again.\n\n<PERSON>'s TDD is excellent and even though I am certain DC is more than capable of picking him up and throwing him into the 12th row of the arena, I don't see it happening. <PERSON> has proven in his title defenses that it's going to take more than raw power to finally beat him. \n\n > I think he would have been UFC heavyweight Champion long ago if he stayed at heavyweight.\n\nHard to disagree. \n\nLike I said, I could be totally wrong about DC having an issue going back to <PERSON>. He might even benefit from it and be a fucking animal in there because he's not coming off a weight cut.", "252" ], [ "Yeah, he disappeared a while ago.\n\nThe jumper cables thing wasn't always an immediate punchline. He kinda had to build up to it and work it in slowly.\n\nI posted a crackpot theory a while back about <PERSON> and <PERSON> being the same person. The timeline of when <PERSON> disappeared and <PERSON> joined fit together nicely.\n\n<PERSON> showed up to deny it said something like \"I'm an amateur compared to that guy. He's next level.\"", "186" ], [ "I'll give some folks a pass on that one. \n\nA lot of people get tested when they are kids, so I can understand why some of them might know the number and not the scale. I got tested around 5 y/o (alas, I am not a genius). The only reason I know what I scored is because my parents told me. \n\nI'm not sure it's a good idea to put numbers on this kind of thing in the first place. Yes, you can measure things like spatial reasoning and logical processing, but that's not nearly the full picture. \n\nIf you get arrested and put in handcuffs, chances are you did something stupid. \nYour intelligence in that moment isn't very high. BUT...if you know how to be get out of handcuffs and manage to do so, no you're a genius. UNTIL...the cops chase you down and beat you senseless. Now you're dumb again.\n\nThis is a stupid example, but I guess what I'm saying is people develop certain knowledge and abilities based on their experiences. Being \"intelligent\" under one set of conditions doesn't necessarily make you \"intelligent\" under another set of conditions.", "438" ], [ "I'm guessing you mean the occasional nasty nut.\n\nPro-tips: \n\n1. The nuts that don't open very much (or at all) when they are roasted probably aren't worth opening. The moisture inside is what causes the shells to split open in the oven. Dry nuts don't open and taste like shit.\n\n2. Rub the skin off the nut before you eat it. If it doesn't easily slide off, it means it's rancid.", "794" ], [ "I respect that.\n\nBy the time I got to my college senior year, I had two kids. I just wanted to be done with the shit and stopped caring about grades so much. \n\nI knew public speaking / presenting was what people wanted to do the least in group projects. I started volunteering for it at the beginning of every project in exchange for other team members doing the writing and research.\n\nIn every case, this was perfectly agreeable with everyone involved.", "104" ], [ "This meshes with my understanding. I'll piggyback a bit.\n\nAsiatic languages in general are difficult for westerners. They are considered \"tonal\" languages. \n\nIn English, if you make the correct series of vowel and consonant sounds, you just said a word. You can change the tone of the sounds and it doesn't change the word (although you might sound like a jackass).\n\nIn Mandarin, you might have a single syllable sound like \"ba\" that means 5 different things depending on the inflection and tone used.\n\nThe difficulty goes both ways though. Verb conjugation is murder for native speakers of tonal languages. They are not accustomed to past / present / future tense changing the word you say. Western languages are all about doing this and are really inconsistent structurally.\n\nswim - swam / trim - trimmed\n\nWTF???\n\nIn general, island tongues are considered more difficult because it implies some historical isolation and potential for dissimilarity with other regional languages. Icelandic and Japanese are considered the most difficult major languages to learn thanks to certain unique aspects of both.", "625" ], [ "Hmmm...I think I should don the Liverpool flair. Besides the fact that \n\n1. I do root for Liverpool in any game on the other side of the Atlantic\n\n2. MLS flairs get no respect around here \n\n3. I am actually quite a bit of a cunt.\n\n4. I publicly predicted the win over ManCity (first loss) right after <PERSON> left for Barca.\n\nEDIT: Wow, downvotes? You guys really are cunts. I'm totally a Liverpool fan now.", "423" ], [ "GE uses a sealed pressure transmitter specifically for combustion dynamics monitoring on their gas turbines. For awhile, the only approved unit installed on their monitoring panels was made in a single factory in Coventry UK.\n\nThere was a fire in the factory a few years ago. It took them 9 months just to be able to make the ~~silicone~~ silicon wafers again. Even then, there were so many quality issues, GE had to start using another manufacturer.", "304" ], [ "**Captain <PERSON>:** Are the engines back up yet, <PERSON>\n \n**<PERSON>:** Aye Captain. Tisn't the prettiest patching up, but the old girl should get us back home safe.\n\n**Captain <PERSON>:** Good work, <PERSON>. Did you find out how it happened? Was it sabotage?\n\n**<PERSON>:** Can't say for sure, Captain, but it is a bit strange that a piece of debris managed to make its way all the way to the core of the ship without causing catastrophic failure of the entire hull.\n\n**Captain Kirk:** All the way to the reactor? Hmmm...I'll assign a security detail to the engine room just in case there is a traitor in our midst. How did you manage to repair the reactor core without shutting off life support? \n\n**<PERSON>:** Oh, it was nothing Captain. I pulled the shite out and stuck a piece of chewing gum over the hole. As I said Captain, it wasn't pretty, but she'll get us home.\n\n**Captain Kirk:** As I said, <PERSON>...good work.", "485" ], [ "I had the same issue with the coils. I switched over to the RBD with a TV8 BBB tank. I ran a set of 0.3ohm clapton coils in it for over two months (I re-wicked a couple of times).\n\nIf you're going to go this route, I suggest buying two decks. Keep a fresh build handy so you can swap it out easily and don't have to sit down and do a rebuild every time you need fresh coils. \n\nIt's definitely the way to go cost-wise.", "542" ], [ "I noticed.\n\nAt the time, I assumed it was because <PERSON> already scored and <PERSON> was giving his back-up a better chance to net one by putting him up top.\n\nI've got to say though, it makes a lot of sense stylistically to move <PERSON> out wide when he plays with <PERSON>. As you said, <PERSON> is more of a target man while <PERSON> has more ability to create the space needed to send in crosses.", "195" ], [ "ATL is currently in first place with a hefty goal differential. \n\nIf we beat them, we'll both have 22 pts with Atlanta edging us out on GD for the top spot, but it will be a pretty monumental statement game. Really hoping to see <PERSON> and <PERSON> back in the lineup for it. \n\nIf yesterday was evidence of anything, we really need <PERSON> back there.", "720" ], [ "We should probably make a distinction between fame and wealth. \n\nFame isn't always a good thing. It comes at a price. \n\nBeing worshiped by adoring fans is cool, but getting chased around by paparazzi isn't exactly my idea of a good time.\n\n<PERSON> is well-liked here on Reddit. He probably deserves the the positive reaction he gets because he seems like a real bro. But he's also had a stalker break into his home...more than once.", "336" ] ]
457
[ 5871, 18541, 6610, 15943, 1943, 3183, 22470, 22875, 14903, 18558, 8140, 17392, 14958, 17991, 1119, 12529, 6508, 24030, 3946, 22871, 3739, 23103, 9648, 15196, 2132, 15991, 21010, 17632, 12510, 585, 22189, 3879, 9011, 6036, 8760, 4390, 25188, 2472, 6248, 6172, 15372, 23922, 8254, 19878, 14574, 10302, 22256, 13049, 19352, 452, 6179, 12961, 9679, 24640, 22805, 20681, 4517, 23706, 19063, 15179, 14501, 23552, 10221, 4328, 13845, 6468, 15319, 17395, 21491, 15562, 12047, 17133, 1346, 19768, 16203, 3258, 8854, 15341, 25316, 13639, 6242, 15205, 11780, 16460, 2511, 17947, 2699, 3731, 9987, 2082, 16235, 7268, 22483, 16554, 21654, 18026, 3043, 14999, 19438, 17868, 21094, 5032, 4702, 5226, 21037, 8468, 21575, 8334, 25413, 5726, 10591, 5458, 15761, 10810, 7447, 10840, 11405, 7911, 19811, 14070, 3086, 23507, 3373, 15843, 15026, 6899, 9467, 7394, 10923, 23021, 9586, 22286, 9857, 5328, 7156, 10391, 17310, 6439, 6885, 15622, 16933, 7134, 2860, 5954, 22080, 22772, 4793, 11608, 20735, 20123, 22818, 7019, 5341, 23369, 16144, 5184, 20175, 22118, 13626, 19314, 14483, 5082, 9317, 7703, 6839, 23320, 11858, 19669, 9656, 5494, 17280, 20575, 22637, 18748, 10876, 10731, 5534, 9057, 9895, 17932, 4233, 3915, 13524, 21009, 24567, 8999, 3554, 22672, 3871, 24496, 14747, 9909, 13160, 10787, 8094, 853, 11081, 23289, 2309, 8160, 7603, 24405, 17096, 15450, 19672, 22609, 7336, 13661, 6209, 20715, 17845, 2766, 24791, 21131, 12295, 20348, 10623, 18857, 13710, 80, 6211, 10354, 4715, 7619, 10033, 6431, 18948, 1255, 18649, 20244, 4713, 4373, 4903, 21881, 9283, 14412, 151, 23590, 24196, 20375, 2813, 6200, 22908, 24477, 7549, 6742, 8443, 11860, 12642, 15012, 4333, 23839, 2649, 8506, 9875, 19682, 16243, 18148, 12535, 18198, 1624, 23996, 25526, 795, 3885, 22151, 18602, 13807, 20255, 22832, 4111, 9670, 13671, 15170, 9549, 14297, 22763, 15290, 17832, 16422, 1089, 23484, 9975, 24945, 23226, 8129, 10987, 3658, 15777, 13745, 16675, 3578, 7789, 3957, 15733, 17633, 10466, 15560, 10009, 14840, 6444, 12966, 15771, 13294, 2229, 22779, 15173, 18655, 2532, 7658, 18314, 1543, 13135, 14287, 2203, 17781, 2763, 18319, 15064, 12383, 4943, 18004, 14107, 25300, 1525, 24495, 14377, 1438, 11382, 15053, 17390, 688, 1434, 6572, 314, 997, 23161, 8859, 16509, 23521, 19716, 12610, 18239, 2308, 13234, 5971, 17299, 25011, 10275, 9073, 12775, 9552, 21682, 19950, 12678, 9061, 24654, 20985, 21097, 5764, 5091, 9566, 7052, 24271, 5902, 18187, 7651, 20601, 569, 8191, 5833, 5047, 24118, 3272, 23488, 635, 19041, 16625, 17624, 3773, 7767, 875, 7346, 8341, 3995, 1015, 22063, 4924, 3384, 6849, 4222, 7753, 18214, 6845, 12331, 1211, 22480, 19509, 11366, 25102, 16563, 6393, 10655, 16505, 21223, 23576, 23386, 2980, 9182, 9202, 24541, 6454, 14409, 19588, 3675, 1225, 7140, 19646, 25214, 25218, 9404, 23793, 19118, 9160, 3437, 3538, 22375, 5882, 1862, 16451, 23949, 18138, 15249, 162, 13349, 21591, 21378, 1510, 21638, 5266, 21351, 24049, 20934, 20825, 16680, 13798, 4372, 19098, 2121, 13364, 15070, 24399, 22387, 23361, 5746, 19393, 19040, 10336, 16394, 10035, 19219, 1658, 12589, 14041, 12672, 18831, 19865, 7501, 14090, 7882, 4942, 1340, 1422, 277, 17620, 18084, 2786, 23959, 20032, 7062, 25177, 25277, 10516, 6064, 14517, 8699, 10984, 17027, 21949, 11665, 19403, 23851, 7679, 8905, 19145, 9442, 6978, 4391, 16196 ]
reddit_dump_-SmashingSunflowers-
[ [ "He was telling me a story about whenever I was born, haha it was actually kind of funny. my 25th birthday is coming up which is what brought it up. He said he was so sleep deprived for a split second he thought the placenta was me and felt terrified until he heard my little baby screams. Apparently he didn't see my mom give birth because he had my older half brother who he was trying to take to my mom's sister and didn't come back in time.\n\nAnd then the moment had to get ruined because for some reason he still obsesses over my mother and how much she apparently wronged him even though he's already remarried and has been for well over a decade", "512" ], [ "Thank you, you're right and I agree. I think for the longest time I put up with it because he is a parent to me more than my mother ever was. I live about 2 hours away from him and I used to be in a community choir, and even though he has a sickness he still drove 2 hours just to come see me sing for a couple hours whereas my mom couldn't even be bothered to do that when I was in high school and we lived 10 minutes away. There's so many different instances he's done things for me my mom hasn't\n\nmy life is so fucking complicated and crazy. My dad growing up was very abusive to my mom and half brother, so when I was 9 and we ran away, my mom and brother ended up abusing me. my mom was very resentful of the shitty choices she made in life and she took it out on me because I wasn't planned. \n\nHonestly I always feel guilty when I talk to him because I know how he treated my mom whenever I was growing up, I witnessed it. I need to not have the notion in my mind that just because he might treat me better than my mom treated me doesn't mean that he's treating me good. For the longest time I also made excuses for the abuse my mom put me through because she was a single mother living in the USA taking care of two kids when she could barely speak English. My fiance put me straight on that, though. my mom had a tendency to throw in my face how much she had to sacrifice for us like I had any choice", "851" ], [ "Sadly it's what I'm doing now! I'm 24, I work full time as a welder, and in January I started school. I am only taking 2 classes (paying out of pocket), one isn't intermediate math class to help me get back on track towards college math, and the other is composition. Even with just two classes it's kind of difficult juggling riding my essays, studying for my math, while working full-time \n\nI'm getting all of my general studies done at a community college, trying to pay out of pocket, and the hopes that I can get a computer science bachelor's degree at the end of all this \n\nHopefully I didn't shoot myself in the foot and this all pays out in the end. I don't have a family to rely on, so I'm on my own with this venture", "104" ], [ "I am hung up on it because this woman has been abusive to me for so long, but this post isn't about <PERSON>. I have had <PERSON> blocked for a long time, she was completely out of my mind until <PERSON> randomly sent this out of the blue. I'm too busy juggling school and full-time work.\n\n This post is about my absolute best friend betraying me by telling this chick all of my personal problems, knowing our history. I completely understand <PERSON> is the way that she is. That's why I have her blocked. I'm just shocked my best friend did this", "572" ], [ "I sent <PERSON> a very long message about how I feel a very strong boundary has been crossed and that I really don't want to talk to her for a while. I told her that she has a very similar friend who did things to her that <PERSON> did to me, and I would never end a million years tell that chick anything about <PERSON>. And I am just utterly sad that <PERSON> even thought this was okay. <PERSON> is <PERSON>, she's never going to change which is why I have her blocked. But <PERSON> strongly crossed the line and I made sure she knew it", "572" ], [ "honestly I was very embarrassed to post this because I knew comments like that would be brought up. You are absolutely right that this is something 14 and 15 year olds would do. I'm going to college for fuck sakes! And <PERSON> has a kid, I'm not sure how she has the time to do all this. honestly I was very proud of myself for the message I sent <PERSON>, telling her how I felt a very strong boundary was broken and I feel like I need a break from this relationship. Because this is something I would have never done to her, I reminded her that she has a very similar friend who has done terrible things to her like <PERSON> has done to me. And I told <PERSON> I would have never told that woman anything, because why would I? Why should that person know?", "751" ], [ "I just find out hard to think that it's the first one because she would constantly tell me that I'm her only friend, that I'm the only one who reaches out to her when she has problems, and that no one ever helps her out of a situation like me. Honestly I think she's just dumb and or two faced. There are many times she would tell me about any random friend of hers who would be mean to her, or wrong her in any way. And then they would hang out immediately afterwards. I should have seen the signs, but I made the mistake of thinking I was exempt from that since we were best friends for so long. That was my mistake\n\nIronically enough, in those text messages she screenshotted me she told <PERSON> the same thing. That she's never had a friend like <PERSON> before. When I pointed out to her, that she would trash talk <PERSON> to me and said that I was her only friend, and then tell <PERSON> the same thing, she just came up with some excuse about how that was actually about me. My brain cells died when she said that. Made no sense. I genuinely feel embarrassed being 24 and having to deal with this", "572" ], [ "I don't think anyone is saying you don't love your cat or that you're shitty to your cat. I think they're trying to say that if you're going to play with your cat like that, it's better to use a toy than your hand.\n\nI have a very wonderful and fluffy cat. He is the light of my life, but he is an absolute nightmare sometimes when we play around. my fiance made the mistake of playing with him as a kitten the same way you are, with the hand and not with toys. Now the cat thinks it's okay to bite and play aggressively with body parts. Our other two cats don't do that because we didn't do that with those cats, but this kitten was just so darn cute and fluffy. \n\nEven now if we just pet him, he will love the pets and then suddenly randomly attack like how your cat is. it's not that we are harassing the cat, like you're not harassing the cat, but the cat now thinks your hand is a toy or something to be played with and it's a hard habit to break once you get tired of it.", "287" ], [ "Yep I make sure to watch for body signs like the ears going back, eye squinting a bit or what have you. I can't blame my fiance, the cat was so cute and fluffy and adorable and it was so cute when he played with your hand, didn't even cross our mind that it would carry on.\n\nHonestly the worst of it comes whenever they are ready to get fed. We have them on a feeding schedule because I have an orange cat who was overweight. when it gets close to feeding time my big fluffy boy comes up to the bed and starts nibbling on me. Little asshole lol", "287" ], [ "<PERSON> has been in the child's life since he was a toddler. The bio mom is dead, it's not like they're gonna divorce and the child still has loving mother to be around. Actually, that is what's gonna happen because <PERSON> adopted the kid. That's her kid, she's the kid's mother. If <PERSON> didn't do that, and they divorced, he would have not allowed the kid to see <PERSON>, who has been the mother figure in his life since toddler age. You're a cruel person if you think that's ok.", "843" ], [ "> and his custody might be brought into the divorce where it wouldn't have been before\n\nYou're right, it wouldn't have before because OPs ex could have made sure the child won't see <PERSON> again, which is just wrong and cruel. The kid already lost one mother. She's been in his life as a mother figure since he was a toddler. She did the right thing by legally adopting him that way she can still mother her child even though she isn't with the cheating ex.", "774" ], [ "Do you think it would have been better if they divorced and she wasn't a part of his life anymore? If you don't, what other way could she have gone about this? Even though she was his mother figure since he was a toddler, the father could have legally kept him from seeing her. How would that not damage him, either? To not only have 1 mother lost, but the woman who took care of you for years and years just disappear because his father couldn't be bothered to not sleep with everything.", "774" ], [ "She was his full blown mother when he was only 3 years old, and was in his life long before then. I get he is the bio father, but she has been in his life practically the whole time. The father only had one or 2 years (at most) more than she did, we can't objectively say his bond is stronger or not. Especially when he was banging some ex and getting her knocked up. Doesn't seem like a good bond to me. He was going to leave the country with the kid. How do you explain to your child that you will never see mom again, and by the way, she actually was never your mom? The kid was calling her mom and he was going to take that away from him.", "774" ], [ "> You’ve known him for a few years, his father has known him his whole life.\n\nShe was his full parental mother figure by the age of 3, and has been in his life even longer than that. The father having the kid a year or 2 max longer than OP is hardly *you've only known him a few years whereas the father knew him his whole life* as far as children can recollect in their past, she HAS been with him his whole life. That's his mother, the only mother he's known.", "502" ], [ "Meh. It was either that, or have the father rip the kid away and having to explain to the kid why the woman he calls mom suddenly isn't around anymore. Both are traumatic. But one leads to him having the same mom since he can remember who loves him enough to fight for him, or having idk how many different step moms since the husband is terrible enough to cheat and destroy this kid's family. But you can see it how you do.", "502" ], [ "Yep, blame the dad for that one. If he never cheated and if the threat of the kid being taken away was never there, this situation would never have happened. there are many many biological families who are literally going through this. The term staying for the children is a saying *for a reason*. a divorce is traumatic, it was always going to be traumatic for the kid regardless. Thats why cheaters are looked down on so much, they're destroying their own family just to fuck someone else \n\nWith this divorce, he still gets to see his mother who he's known since he was a child. If they divorced without the adoption, he would have never been able to see the woman he called mother again simply because she was not legally his mother even though she raised him since he was a little toddler and he's all she's ever known. Which is absolutely traumatic in it's own right. So, the divorce with the ability to still have his mother in his life seems to be a bit better than the divorce and her all of a sudden not being in his life anymore and the father having to explain that the woman he called mother was never his mother and that's how fast he can lose a mother .. *again*... \n\nshitty situation, wish the father never put <PERSON> and the kid with that in the first place.", "774" ], [ "She stated she's does not live in the US.\n\n4 years of lies of not having a perfect family I can guarantee would be just a bit less traumatic than having a second mother disappear and not be in your life anymore. Jesus. Just imagine the abandonment issues the kid would have. At least the kid knows OP loves him enough to go through that to keep their bond. Crazy as it may be, parents do crazy things for their kids.", "774" ], [ "And you don't think problems would have been prevalent if the father took the kid to another country like he was planning to? explain to your child why the woman you call mother is seemingly not in your life anymore? Never to see her again? That would be the second time he lost his mother. you want to talk about abandonment issues. The moment the father cheated on his wife, and threatened to take his kid away to another country, there was going to be problems and trauma. At least here, op insured that the kid would have the person he called Mom since he could talk in his life. \n\nLike I told another comment, the divorce was going to be messy regardless. It was going to be traumatic with the kid regardless. He was going to take the kid away from the only mom he's known, THAT'S using your kid as a pawn for your own gains. I've been through a divorce with my biological parents, many kids have. it can really mess with you. and then have the person you call Mom just not in your life anymore at all, as a kid you wonder what you did wrong. even though realistically it was the father's fault, as a child you don't know that kind of stuff and you think it's you. you think the father's going to explain to the kid that he cheated and took his kid to another country and that's why he can't see the mom anymore?\n\n He already lost one mom, and then he was going to lose a second mom. That's absolutely shitty. What are you gonna tell the kid? \"Oh, that woman who you called mom actually wasn't your mom. Your real mom is dead, and this lady although was a mother figure to you since you can recollect memories, she wasn't legally yours so you're just not going to see her again. It's okay, you'll be okay, though, because that wasn't your real mom anyway. \n\n\nFucked up. this whole situation is fucked up. No one to blame but the father.", "774" ], [ "Nah, what her boyfriend is doing is not support and that's what she's complaining about. You say she should get used to it, I say that's a load of shit. She got her bachelor's degree, that's no easy feat. She deserves to have support and even some *superficial* cheerleading for that. He didn't even congratulate her. You think that support? are you really implying your wife wouldn't even congratulate you if you got a bachelor's degree? Seems sad to me", "164" ] ]
433
[ 11888, 10898, 3576, 10426, 10340, 20356, 9604, 7676, 16200, 944, 14400, 787, 25236, 25166, 22560, 17655, 11059, 21043, 2565, 956, 7593, 21563, 18170, 22105, 1296, 23692, 19417, 21481, 15531, 13603, 25048, 11183, 15375, 11666, 10721, 11292, 6408, 18942, 657, 712, 20336, 17817, 6718, 152, 9635, 1596, 14988, 8771, 19561, 17674, 14490, 7565, 21447, 20105, 5711, 13272, 10667, 10437, 19910, 23257, 9749, 22292, 7260, 24323, 9658, 3794, 24286, 2137, 22768, 2834, 16280, 5548, 25542, 20922, 6291, 11633, 930, 15607, 22888, 6101, 23237, 18628, 17111, 2189, 12294, 20326, 9455, 18350, 7600, 1253, 15847, 12930, 12851, 6609, 20305, 13111, 15252, 22299, 621, 10715, 17595, 8522, 7316, 9918, 18092, 7040, 24724, 19550, 20162, 9247, 22581, 9470, 2591, 2543, 21944, 20234, 20518, 4851, 4083, 23132, 17475, 12833, 14465, 1544, 2911, 5300, 22099, 13348, 21282, 131, 772, 20205, 7282, 13123, 13698, 20836, 4694, 4926, 22176, 21702, 10203, 3356, 9094, 12468, 13762, 9070, 14006, 24432, 8896, 10109, 1412, 5129, 21285, 22745, 19832, 13866, 24524, 5504, 17389, 20875, 19050, 12068, 1055, 18263, 2236, 7757, 8925, 19396, 22475, 18002, 16512, 9234, 20765, 9311, 23779, 19266, 8045, 18535, 16091, 18738, 20327, 16435, 8151, 25139, 17538, 9194, 347, 8619, 2513, 15642, 25168, 8858, 9196, 18324, 4544, 4356, 10382, 3596, 5950, 23572, 18500, 5426, 24786, 10747, 10189, 6629, 14968, 4844, 14922, 10060, 17504, 22744, 17651, 16756, 5876, 5405, 9667, 1332, 19680, 5203, 6218, 20547, 6289, 25394, 2393, 13350, 1564, 16020, 3872, 6672, 10613, 7694, 24868, 18162, 21644, 24686, 8791, 22826, 15312, 5655, 24863, 18678, 12021, 2924, 9344, 13086, 16753, 7144, 2252, 25074, 15245, 9319, 18102, 25117, 24587, 5783, 14432, 17759, 4484, 3976, 2173, 23242, 24042, 19449, 2523, 3561, 25180, 6654, 17905, 16539, 1576, 7832, 12273, 8784, 3068, 24421, 22354, 12704, 6394, 20309, 4933, 20250, 13528, 16362, 25254, 2941, 24992, 21817, 22194, 2388, 11006, 14282, 24431, 10474, 17058, 4964, 17765, 19014, 20794, 3619, 21154, 13990, 17842, 18810, 5457, 25269, 9775, 4656, 10356, 4602, 14629, 7047, 12185, 9637, 21560, 13054, 4855, 14777, 607, 4352, 18029, 21393, 17363, 21281, 12283, 18321, 23377, 8227, 17466, 9219, 5801, 19554, 2362, 21684, 22217, 14503, 2300, 20370, 18072, 4867, 13303, 15424, 570, 9436, 1884, 17700, 21259, 21640, 8637, 6133, 24596, 10729, 22410, 20769, 3503, 11942, 20064, 6329, 23823, 21789, 3907, 16741, 19234, 11892, 1226, 15529, 22223, 24820, 16449, 15236, 23683, 22983, 17228, 2482, 12662, 16513, 211, 790, 21498, 17360, 22195, 1522, 7733, 22241, 23067, 11033, 15308, 23526, 7114, 17175, 11329, 24723, 22610, 493, 20005, 11791, 18951, 15631, 22718, 3569, 5398, 16184, 18625, 18811, 17284, 18604, 8199, 18357, 11675, 14164, 2642, 1068, 18601, 7060, 15408, 2570, 22411, 15271, 13683, 21707, 25141, 15326, 5100, 6220, 820, 18094, 3708, 16042, 8526, 18196, 3310, 12064, 2404, 931, 14047, 17203, 17853, 9145, 21871, 8964, 3347, 11121, 11377, 2156, 21697, 3032, 18388, 24816, 16588, 16336, 9938, 21546, 12576, 4152, 15079, 18905, 11283, 12320, 20665, 13041, 445, 13827, 18432, 6494, 22491, 15575, 6055, 2633, 14508, 6635, 21190, 1507, 4971, 9993, 4613, 19906, 14511, 24077, 25370, 2130, 13941, 6286, 1981, 13912, 4545, 17324, 17068, 3779, 15030, 19974, 4431, 15405, 20704, 5569, 18805, 11902, 13341, 13534, 18163 ]
reddit_dump_-TheOutsid3r-
[ [ "Actually, the Alliance did not win that. It was a stalemate. Just never properly explained but partially due to the way the assault was conducted. Remember the quest text about \"Not behaving like the Orks\" and \"surgical\". \n\n_URL_0_\n\nThe Horde gets hurt by the attack but manages to beat it back. It then goes back to endless fighting in the middle as both player sides are send off to the next place. Blizzard pretty much wasn't willing to give Alliance this victory at all. Despite <PERSON>, <PERSON> etc. \n\nCataclysm in it's entirety was a mess, especially since the whole \"the Alliance will strike back and we'll phase the world throughout the expansion!\" never actually happened. Heck they admitted they build up to something they could never deliver on. BfA seems like they're making that same mistake, AGAIN.", "212" ], [ "To be fair, that would only work if your enemy is as stupid as can be. What commander would have ALL, absolutely ALL of their troops charge in then follow in themselves to allow the enemy to seal them inside afterwards. After they allowed the enemy to break the siege ring and move out the bulk of their troops. \n\nYou can say her actions were \"stupid evil\" but a plan like sealing the Alliance inside UC would make the Alliance just plain stupid for not only falling for such a childish ploy but actively setting up the situation in which it could happen.", "105" ], [ "To be fair, even that doesn't make him all that trustworthy. It merely means that he'll do anything to survive. \n\n<PERSON> isn't necessarily stupid. She's never shown to be that. She is however arrogant, overconfident and absolutely convinced of her own superiority. This has been a problem for her all along. She didn't send runners to aid and warn <PERSON> untill it was far too late for example, even before she was raised into undeath. In the exerpts we have about her as living elf we see her as self absorbed and arrogant (partly justified). \n\n<PERSON> problem isn't plain stupidity, it's thinking everyone else is a complete and utter imbecile and seeing herself as infallible despite having ample proof she is anything but. She rejects the very notion she could be outmaneuvered or twarted.", "474" ], [ "Not only that. People who say you should wait have a certain way of arguing: \"It's not finished yet, you should wait and see!\" which leads to \"This is only the first patch, we don't know where things are headed yet!\" all the way too \"Maybe you should've said something earlier when they could've changed something!\" at the end of the expansion. \n\nIt's basically endless goal post moving. First you're supposedly too early, then it's a story in progress and then you are too late to complain. Rinse and repeat indefinitely. We got the same advice back during Cataclysm Alpha/Beta and we all know how that turned out.", "7" ], [ "Actually, the reason he left the Alliance was because he was one of those who wanted to be done with the Orcs. The Orcs who were mostly war criminals and part of the old horde rather than lock them up. Which in hindsight might've been the better idea given how that turned out. \n\nAs for denying all Lordaeron survivors entry, this is surprisingly reasonable. Yes it's nasty business. It's however nasty business that likely saved them from the spread of the plague. Nobody else survived it in the Northern Kingdoms. It was actively being spread by infiltrators and many infected who tried to flee.", "212" ], [ "Erm what? He incarcerated the Belfs under <PERSON> for working with the Naga. Who had proven themselves to be enemies of the Alliance already. Oh he absolutely distrusted the Belfs, that much was obvious but it was not the motivating factor behind him locking <PERSON> and co up. \n\nThen again, people forget that the <PERSON>/later <PERSON> weren't any better. They were always condescending/looking down upon non Helfs. They only ever used the Humans in their wars against the Trolls and buggered off as soon as possible. They were completely content to let the Humans deal with the Horde and <PERSON> untill both threats came knocking at their door. In the later day kicked it in and beat them over the head with it. They were nominal allies at times but there wasn't any love lost between them. \n\nYou also see that he expresses no such sentiments towards Dwarfs/and or Gnomes. So it doesn't appear to be \"non humans\" in general but rather certain groups of non humans. \n\n<PERSON> had a bunch of issues, being a bad commander and short sighted were amongst them. Neither <PERSON> nor <PERSON> were any better however where prejudice and general nastiness were concerned. \n\nAnd she wouldn't have left him \"in charge of the Alliance\", she would have left him in charge of the remnants of the Lordaeron Alliance. A position he mostly got because everyone else was dead.", "212" ], [ "Citation for that statement? Not doubting you, would just like to actually see it. He also didn't send them against the undead, he told them to hold the position they were occupying. \n\nIn game it's never shown whether he had a legitimate need for those troops, it was his often shown ineptitude at play or if he was trying to get them killed. So if Blizzard gave a canon reason I'd love to see it to clarify that. \n\nAnd I've never contested that he was an incompetent asshole, who ended up in charge solely because he was pretty much the last guy around in Lordaeron at that point. His interactions with basically anyone make that fairly obvious. In case of the dwarfs however we don't know if he's basically a general ripper who shouldn't be in charge of anyone and just refering to his troops.\n\nHe also was NOT in charge of the Alliance in general. Heck his legitimacy overall was rather dubious.", "212" ], [ "It's not really a shift though. Sylvanas was always like this, large parts of the Orcs were always like this. People just chose to ignore it. If anything it's a return to how the Horde usually operates. Thralls/Voljins Horde were the outliers, not the other way around. \n\nSeems odd to throw in ones lot with a faction that goes so against ones beliefs and views.", "1022" ], [ "<PERSON> was going of the rails for quite some time. Which was very much intentionally caused by <PERSON> and <PERSON>. The problem is, <PERSON> was not wrong. It was nasty business, horrifically so but we've got ample evidence that dealing the way he did was basically the only way to deal with it at all. \n\nThe whole thing was set up to drive a wedge between him and those close to him and it succeeded beautifully. It left him angry, isolated and vengeful. Which in turn caused him to chase <PERSON> to Northrend and become increasingly unhinged. By the time he met <PERSON> again, he already had a huge chip on his shoulder.", "34" ], [ "We also see it in the Caverns of Time. The city is overrun with zombies and worse in short order. Yes there's some people who haven't turned yet trying to flee but this only adds to the issue. Even if we simply assume that 90% of them were genuinely not infected, the remaining 10% would've caused the outbreak to swep through the kingdoms in the way it later did once nobody was around to reign it in. \n\nIt was a win/win situation for <PERSON>. Either he'll isolate <PERSON>, force these choices upon him and drive him towards a desired outcome or he'd unleash the plague and ravage <PERSON>.", "110" ], [ "Pretty much, yes. They have a lighter version of this in other games such as WoW. Where a streamer tested it out by having people report a completely harmless remark such as \"I love WoW\". He first got banned from chat, then a short term suspension on his account.\n\nIf you wanted, you could get a crowd together and basically report a player en masse. Then when their ban runs out do so again to eventually rid yourself of them entirely.", "496" ], [ "Even if paused, it's still running. Think about pausing a game. However when you actually close and end the program, it's gone. The difference here is between keeping the actual program or making a copy of it. \n\nIt's like \"moving\" data by copying it while simultaneously deleting the original. If said data was alive, you'd be killing it and making a copy in its place at exact same time. It's not the original, even if it believes itself to be. \n\nWhy this matters is simple, because we're talking about consciousness transfer. Any approach that does not keep the program itself running without interruption, any approach that constitutes making a copy and destroying the original is NOT a transfer. It's killing the original to cover up it never went anywhere to begin with.", "926" ], [ "Well yes. It's like advising one side to not show up to the battle so the other side will \"feel stupid and go home\". Which isn't really what happens. If you don't show up to fight the marauding invaders they wont feel stupid, they'll just happy skip the battle part and instantly go to pillaging, looting, killing the townspeople and so on.\n\nAdvice to ignore them is either misinformed and a horrible interpretation of the situation, such as your mother in grade school telling you to \"ignore the bully till he gets bored\". Which doesn't bother the bully at all, because it's not about attention or an reaction from you, it's about having an outlet for their violent tendencies, exerting power and so on.\n\nOr worse, it's malicious. Someone trying to discourage you from fighting back, trying to shame you for it and convince you to be passive and just endure. Most often because they're roughly aligned with the bully if not outright in their corner.", "877" ], [ "This, makes absolutely no sense as a rebuttal whatsoever. None. Not one tiny bit. Ignoring your opposition throughout history has never worked, unless you were in power, could shut down any dialogue and effectively silence them. Which isn't the case here at all. \n\nYou're telling people to not organize, to not back up those under attack, to not prevent them turning ones flank over and over again. To sit content, placid and passive even as they launch assault after assault after assault and carry home victory every single last time. Because you showing up doesn't mean they'll run out of propaganda, it merely means they're going to make something up. \n\nThe way <PERSON> did, the way <PERSON> did, the way that other chick did. Where they're simply logging out, writing their own harassment and threats and then decry those. \n\nYou sir, are vile. To an extreme degree. You're right now blaming the actions of the SJW mob, how they perverted justice and decent behaviour on their opponents. For opposing them. That's absolutely insane.", "763" ], [ "There is an object at your friends, let's say a vase. You get the exact schematics for said vase. You make a copy of said vase at your place. Now your friend smashes the vase at his place. \n\nYou could use some weird esoteric argument as to how said vase is now at your place, as you have an exact 1:1 replica of it. That however is simply untrue, you do not. You have a replica, the original never moved and was subsequently destroyed. In fact you could've had both the original and replica exist at the same time. \n\nI've seen people use a weird esoteric approach to the entire \"transfer\" question quite often. Same for \"teleportation\" that's effectively a suicide/copy booth. \n\nThen again, your entire response makes little sense. As you're handwaving away the fact that the object was not moved but instead copied and the original then destroyed to hide that fact. You then go on to accuse the other side of having an \"esoteric\" approach, like souls and faith. It's effectively a non retort that refuses to address the basic problem, instead trying to misrepresent it.", "768" ], [ "> They never managed\nI can stop you right there. Because that is verifiably untrue. Were you invited to the UN? Were you even recently touring the Bioware Studios, are you getting a DC comic, are you being upheld as an icon and so on and on and on. \n\nIt was people like you who from the get go sabotaged the entire thing, whether out of ignorance or maliciousness is really besides the point. You are using minor instances of these people not delivering on their promises, not doing their jobs properly and not following up on things and pretending \"THIS WAS ME, I DID IT REDDIT BY IGNORING THEM!\". \n\nThat is so completely insane an argument. Because from the get go, YOU WERE NOT THEIR TARGET AUDIENCE. They couldn't give less of a shit about you. You were their opponents. Their target audience were game developers, publishers and the public at large. And guess what? You ignoring them had very little impact on how that went one way or another. \n\nYou ignoring them DID NOT kill their exposure. They got plenty of that one way or another. You ignoring them did not tank their sales, you were never their customer. The outrage mobs short attention span, low quality and low effort did that. You ignoring them did nothing to slow down the progress they made with publishers, devs and in the industry. If anything it helped them as the actual customers remained silent. \n\nYou sir, are a condescending piece of s*** with absolutely no clue. May I assume you're a Sargonite, because that would explain a whole lot. Because you're espousing the same goddamn tactics, the same goddamn approach, the same goddamn head in the sand, run away screaming when \"their alarms go off\" and \"they notice us\" that has allowed them to steamroll basically everything since the late 60s. \n\nYou are advocating passivity, defeatism and cowardice. While simultaneously demanding people revert to ways of dealing with these people that haven't worked in the last 60+ years and if anything have played right into their hands. While supposedly YOU are dealing with thhis, YOU are the \"SPECIAL\" forces who know how to handle this. You're a clown.", "342" ], [ "They've completely overtaken literature, to the point where it had withered and died up untill the gate keepers were removed as ebooks became popular. Most of the large publishers are dead or rapidly dying. Sales are in the gutter. Both appeasement and ignoring them was tried and failed, which lead directly contributed to their success.\n\n\nThey've completely overtaken the education system in most of Western Europe, the US and Anglosphere with their \"march through the institutions. Both appeasement and ignoring them hoping they'd go away was tried. It failed and directly contributed to their success. \n\n\nThey've basically overrun much of the media. Both appeasement and ignoring them hoping they'd go away was tried. It failed and directly contributed to their success. \n\n\n\nWe can continue this list indefinitely for every place where they manifested. If they weren't vigorously opposed, kept out and stonewalled they'd get a foothold and expand from there. One of the few places who managed to knock them out was hilariously enough the BDSM community. They didn't give them an inch, they removed people with these inclinations from websites, forums and other social venues. They actively engaged and fought them and they pretty much drove them out entirely in short order. \n\nYet here this guy is, telling everyone to do what has been tried and failed, because only HE is smart enough, only HE knows how to deal with this, only HE is \"Special Forces\". Obviously he can't tell uss any of this, we wouldn't understand anyway! Just trust him, <PERSON> never bothering to finish her series yet walking away with the money and her connections was a win of his. Those games failing because they were terribad? His work! Sure they still get the credit and all but eh!", "633" ], [ "It's kinda funny, you can basically disregard many books if they're professionally published nowadays with the rare exception. Because the big publishers, cons and such have been completely undermined and corrupted. \n\nThe best thing is, their sales are absolute garbage. As in absurdly low. To the point where some Naruto fanfics on the internet have more readers in a week than these books sell in months. Seriously, 2-3 thousand sales are often already a \"best seller\".\n\nSelf published authors on Amazon and other websites, seem to absolutely leave them in the dust in terms of raw numbers. People like <PERSON> completely trounce them in the Amazon statistics and there's no way in hell these people could get their books published by most of the established gate keepers. \n\nThis seems increasingly like the last hurrah of a rapidly fading crowd. Who managed to drive out most of the fans, who tanked sales, ruined publishers who existed for a very long time and completely trashed the literature. Using their last bit of power to go on another power trip.", "215" ], [ "It's bullshit. No seriously, it's absolute bullshit. Just as a quick example, amongst the rapidly growing crowd of self published ebook authors there are some who are genuinely good writers. Often more so than many \"established\" ones. As added bonus, some of them pump out books and stories at an insane pace that makes one think that if these people were to stop being so busy jerking one another off they might already be done with their current series, the series after that and well into the next one.\n\nHeck I am a subpar writer, I picked it up mostly to improve my English. I'm doing commissions for certain crowds one can't post in polite society amongst other things. Things do not take anywhere near as long as these people would have you believe. Especially when looking at how subpar their works often are, with a fairly childish and simple story, inconsistent and underdeveloped characters, weird inter character relationships that only work because \"the author said so\" etc.", "505" ], [ "Yes! Hell yes! I absolutely HATE it when an author finds some political cause, ideology or other thing and suddenly want to peddle it to their readers. Not only are authors not moral authorities or the betters of their readers who can and should preach to them, in some cases they're arguably the exact opposite.\n\nSo it comes off as condescending and often times completely derails the story, wrecks characters etc. A good example would be Andrew Seiples Dire Series. It started out okay <PERSON> Punk esque story. Around book two - three the American election happened and suddenly his MC was hunting down and murdering a rapist <PERSON>. Then brought him back to life so an eastern European character whom he had raped could torture him to death again. Shortly after they time travelled and murdered lots and lots and lots of Nazis. \n\nIt was such an extreme departure from the story up untill then, it was so ill fitting and retroactively changed some characters to make it fit that it instantly klilled the entire thing for me.", "1010" ], [ "The funny thing is, they're not really popular. They basically have no audience if you look at books shipped and actually sold. So they're \"decreed to be popular\" by the \"powers that be\" with all the powers they still hold, which is increasingly less and less due to their own doing. \n\nAs for what they call you, most of these people are frankly speaking clowns. None of this is really \"deep literature\", at least where the stories themselves are concerned. It's people simply deciding whatever they prefer, mostly due to it having the right politics and espousing the right views is \"better\". For example take <PERSON> (he writers under several pen names), he'd be a complete monster according to these people. His books are mostly guilty pleasures to most of his readers, they have everything these peple hate and then some. The stories themselves while interesting are also not all that deep. \n\nYet he uses a bunch of interesting concepts, from human nature and behaviour, all the way to conditioning and \"training others\" to act in certain ways the MC wants to see them act. Fostering <PERSON> jumps to mind here. It basically does what people like <PERSON> try to do with <PERSON> and <PERSON>, but in a realistic way and properly explains it rather than \"X was tortured and turned evil, cause psychology\". It describes the processes, shows the slow shift and shows at least a basic understanding of the way these things work. Yet I'd guarantee you he'd be treated as \"stupid\". Because \"stupid\" is a good way to disqualify anyone and everyone they dislike, cause you don't have to engage \"stupid\" people. \n\nThey're not smart, their female characters aren't strong, their worlds often make little sense once you start asking even basic questions and begin poking holes into their internal consistency and logic or lack thereof. For example, have you ever noticed that in a great many works it's basically just \"Los Angeles/New York society but in a fantasy setting!\", with all the same ethics, values and behavioural norms no matter how little sense this makes? Seriously I could rant and rave all day about this, this stuff is one of my personal pet peeves. Because it makes so little sense and then they expect you to see this as \"smart\" and \"witty\" and \"breaking grounds\" when it's usually just lazy, self induldgent and the same as any number of other \"established\" authors.", "1010" ], [ "Good job, you invented the Ship of Theseus paradox! Unless you already knew of it and are trying to peddle it as your own? Which once again, is fairly esoteric a paradox that's basically just a \"grounds\" for people to argue and test their theories on. \n\nLet's ignore for a moment how you're reducing this entirely to the physical, i.e the self, what fills the vase is markedly absent. It would likely be destroyed in the process of replacing it piece by piece. \n\nAt a certain point, about 50% the vase would lose continuity. It would still retain it to an extend as there'd be no other contender. If you exchanged it in its entirety, you'd both have the same vase and a new vase for a short time. \n\nThis however ends when you require all the original pieces into another vase. Said vase would effectively be the original, it would therefore challenge the copies claim to continuity and anull it. Because the other vase does not retain anything that was part of the original, neither the shell nur the content. \n\nThe reconstituted vase however would be 100% the original vase. In all likelihood minus the contents. As you'd lose them somewhere along the process. You can just fill it with a flower of the same type and water again, however this would not be the same flower. You'd basically have a copy of the contents inside the original shell and a complete copy at that point.", "970" ], [ "Forsaken have ALWAYS been this way. It's just that for once there isn't anyone that can be \"blamed\" for them acting the way they did since the game came out.\n\nThe Unit 731 stuff in Undercity? In game since day 1. Hating the living and loving to inflict suffering? There from the start. Various quests that show them as cackling evil doing evil stuff for the evilz, there from the get go. Heck, they actively hunted down and killed forsaken who didn't go along with this. \n\nFrom killing farmers in Hillsbrad and at the time neutral Kirin Tor, to going full internment camps with \"seedlings\". This stuff has been around every time the focus fell on the forsaken. It was just that there was always some scapegoat that could be blamed and held solely responsible. Which missed the point that usually it wasn't because they did these things but that these things were often done incompetently and didn't yield beneficial results.", "874" ], [ "Yeah but I am fairly certain it was more convenience than anything, as she had a bone to pick with some people in the Twillight Hammer. <PERSON> isn't a real Orc, she has more reasons to hate Orcs than most everyone else not only because of her paternity but also because of what happened to her herself. \n\nIt still feels odd to see her on the Horde side, if anything she should be neutral. Going full \"fur da horde!\" seems really weird.", "280" ], [ "To be fair, while being the bad guys we still win basically everywhere. Undercity is destroyed but it's on Sylvanas terms and the Alliance doesn't even hold it. Stranglethorn Valley, Blasted Lands, all firmly in Horde hands right in the Alliance backyard. Meanwhile from what we've seen the Horde rolled up the Alliance all the way to Darnassus and basically took all their holdings in Kalimdor. \n\nIn a way it's like the usual game, where you come in as protagonist and see your side on the brink of being wiped out. Except as both sides are playable you never get the \"pay off\" where you drive the \"bad guys\" back and reclaim the stuff. Which means while the Horde descends into cackling madness every time the two sides come to blows and the alliance is the moral victor. The Horde makes all the ingame gains and never has to give anything back. \n\nAt this point, if we have another Cataclysm/BFA the Alliance would've run out of places to destroy and the Horde basically owns Azeroth. :/", "436" ], [ "But here's the important question. Do we get to keep Ashenvale, Teldrassil and all the other stuff we grabbed while also reclaiming Undercity and everything around it. While Gilneas remains a smoldering crater, blasted lands and Stranglethorn are held by us despite being right in the backyard of the Alliance and the Alliance also abandons everything else?\n\nBecause if yes, then if we have 1-2 more of these wars were the Horde loses the Alliance ceases to exist.", "436" ], [ "\"The King of Diamonds is a pawn.\" - Likely <PERSON>, seems odd given how that turned out.\n\"Her heart is a creater and we've filled it.\" - Either <PERSON> or <PERSON>. \n\"At the hour of her third death, she ushers in our coming.\" Likely <PERSON>, combined with the former quote it would make sense both apply to her. \n\nThen again, there's no reasons for <PERSON> to be truthful with us, lying and deceiving people is kind of the old gods shtick.", "474" ], [ "<PERSON> never \"died\" though. She was injured twice now. Preventing her from dying is the reason why the other old gods were contained rather than smashed by the Pantheon and also something we're trying to do from BFA. So she doesn't qualify. \n\nAnd well, we know for certain <PERSON> is right out already. \n\nAs for retconning it. True but people also run with \"the boy king\" and assume it's refering to <PERSON> rather than others such as <PERSON> who's \"the black prince\" which is fairly close. It just feels odd that people desperately want some of this to be true and important while dismissing other parts they dislike despite it being the same source.", "768" ], [ "Your reaction to downvotes seems, interesting. Some people have been around for quite some time. They've seen the slow and gradual shift in mod behaviour (not necessarily rules), the new additions, the reach out to other groups who went into laughing fits over it and the background of certain mods which \"supposedly is in the past\" is well known. \n\nYou describe it as \"reality\", pretending to be objective aswell as right. You're neither and most folk seem to fundamentally disagree with you. The whole \"no it's everyone else who's wrong here!\" strongly applies. Guess what, the people on NeoGaf and similar sides also saw their views and take on things as \"reality\", saw themselves as reasonable and didn't see any escalation and shift on their part.", "263" ], [ "\"Meh feels over realz\"\n\"Attack arguments not people\"\n\nI guess you're in violation of the rules then? Because you're very much guilty of attacking people mostly in a roundabout but also very direct manner for disagreeing with you. \n\nThen again, if you want to go the whole \"it's always been like that\" route. Why not talk about how basically none of you guys were part of the original mod team. That you guys were part of the reason most of them are gone, which is still fairly well documented. And that many of you have a rather dodgy background and attitude. \n\nWhat you guys been doing bit by bit slow cooker style is ban discourse, ban topics, ban users and all at your own leisure. Slowly but certainly dismantling what KiA used to be while prevent a mass migration to an alternative by doing it too fast. Killing it slowly instead.", "621" ], [ "Erm, no the Alliance does not hold Undercity. Nor do they hold Gilneas for that matter. They're all the way back in Stromgarde again. Which is where the warfront is. \n\nThe Alliance basically went all the way and then fell back all the way. Which is why this is a pyrrhic victory and seems like a low blow especially when compared to how the Nelves got trounced. \n\nYes the Draenei are still there, same as the Belfs. This is mostly due to them being TBC zones which they wont touch. The Vindicaar seems to be basically forgotten for plot convenience, otherwise it would've swooped in and obliterated the Horde advance on Teldrassil to begin with. The Alliance fought and lost, they lost in Ashenvale, they lost in Dark Shore and then Lost in Teldrassil. All of it is destroyed and quite amply documented. The Horde also seems to HOLD these places. \n\nAside from the Draenei, there is basically no real Alliance presence left in Kalimdor. The Cataclysm places you still see surrounding Theramore are lore wise GONE. The Horde won the barrens, as all of those relied upon Theramore to support them. \n\nMeanwhile, stuff like Stonard in the Swamp of Sorrows which SHOULD have been destroyed. As it's effectively cut off from any Horde territory right in the Alliance backyard is still around and kicking. Nethergarde Keep for example is destroyed, where Rockard/Dreadmaul Hold are still under Horde control. \n\nIt's a bit of a ludicrous situation, with the Horde having various basis in the effective middle of nowhere (from a Horde perspective) right in the backyard of the Alliance. Which for some reason are usually entirely ignored by the Alliance when they should be prime targets for removal. I could draw a map, prolly should and cross of the stuff destroyed during Cataclysm/BfA and fill in the still existing places.", "436" ], [ "Putting the Orcs in camps rather than offing them was one of the reasons why they said screw this we're out. Which in hindsight likely would have been the better chocie from a Human/Elf centric view.\n\nPeople often go \"these poor Orcs!\" but forget that the Orcs in the camps were part of the Horde that initially invaded Azeroth. They set out on a genocidal campaign against the Azerothians. They burned down entire cities, slaughtered civilians and raped their way across Azeroth.\n\nYou could say that later generations do not bear that guilt, the early camp inhabitants however very much did. Many of them are still alive nowadays and as we've seen as recently as Cataclysm. They changed not one bit. Worse, they even turned on their allies and started subjecting them to the same treatment as they did their enemies.", "1022" ], [ "Yeah. She helped the Horde to kill her own father to cement an Alliance with the Orks and <PERSON>. Which rapidly broke down anyway and lead to the eventual destruction of Theramore. \n\n<PERSON> for several xpacs actively worked against the interest of the Alliance such as during the Siege of Undercity after the Wrathgate. When she finally needed <PERSON>, he basically told her to go take a hike. Because unlike her, he had his priorities straight and didn't give a damn.", "475" ], [ "<PERSON> alive, stronger Alliance etc. The whole \"the Orcs were needed\" was the excuse used to justify them sticking around and people going out of their way to keep them around.\n\nHorde and Alliance have done more damage to each other than many of the \"villains\" over time. And if the game couldn't just conjure numbers up out of thin air the conflicts would've been ruinous to both sides. \n\nJust looking at the time frames involved, there should be barely any Orcs around.", "1022" ], [ "Sure but they CHOSE to have stuff go down this way. So the entire thing is on Blizzard and their writing team. This doesn't change how <PERSON> appears within the story. \n\nAnd groups like the Forsaken were always pretty darn evil. Heck my first character was an Undead and the stuff in Undercity goes back as far as Vanilla. The younger Orcs also rapidly drifted that way and you can find instances of this. Even as it slowly escalated <PERSON> characer stayed exactly the same.\n\nExcept when instead of others she was the one who got burned. Suddenly she does an 180 and finds she has helped eliminate most of the militaristic part of the Alliance, actively driven out others and alienated those who would want to do something.", "212" ], [ "The problem is that <PERSON> seems to have two different type of writers. The ones who want to have \"noble savages\" and the ones who basically have \"The Horde\" as it always was. \n\nThis leads to a situation where the Horde constantly engages in absolutely astonishingly evil actions such as Sylvanas Unit 731 she used to run in Undercity all the way to Orcs capturing the Theramore escapees and forcing the parents of children to beat each other to death bare handed because they have their children. Children we never find so they might already be dead. \n\nIt's two different approaches that simply do not fit. Where both sides are portrayed as equally as \"morally grey\" yet one side constantly and regularly pulls stuff like this and is never called out on it, often it's even outright celebrated. It makes the entire faction likes slightly schizophrenic and everyone else weird for never mentioning it. \n\nMAKE UP YOUR GODDAMN MIND BLIZZARD.", "1011" ], [ "Doubt it. Fighting the Alliance is no fun in any way. I leveled my first Alliance character during Cataclysm after playing the Horde side and finding the entire thing completely depressing and grimdark. \n\nIt's as if she Alliance wasn't even aware it was at war, it's barely referenced and the story was shoddy. It made fighting them feel, unfulfilling because it was a one sided curbstomping. I remember being supposed to be outraged over <PERSON>, except I had been to Silverwind Refuge earlier.", "148" ], [ "Which, isn't necessarily canon anymore either. We have similar issues for a bunch of other races, where their reproduction would need to be through the roof to sustain all these wars and conflicts but smaller starting populations obviously make this harder.\n\nMuch of the information we have is 20+ years old and isn't really reflected ingame. I haven't seen litters mentioned anywhere, most of the Orcs we meet appear to be regular single births and have about the same growth/aging as humans do. \n\nI'm fairly certain Blizzard is avoiding this entire topic on purpose and for all the races. Because you'd run into some real number issues. Writers and no sense of units and scale is a bit of a trope in itself.", "1022" ], [ "I might be mistaken but didn't the Trolls start these wars and with a genocidal agenda themselves? \n\n > Humans are brought to EK by their Vrykul parents\n > Settle mostly in places like Lordaeron\n > They expand and come into contact with the Trolls/Elfs\n > Trolls decide they're not going to have another group stick around and try to remove them\n > Stuff goes terrible wrong for them\n\nThat conflict is actually a lot more morally grey. Which makes it more interesting. Fairly sure they even started the wars with the Helfs as they arrived because those did indeed settle in what the Trolls considered \"theirs\" and Trolls not being partial to outsiders in general. Of course the other side in those conflicts didn't act any less savage once they driven back the Trolls.", "1022" ], [ "He's also surprisingly hypocritcal. He took <PERSON> aid at several points, promised her friendship and cooperation. She went so far as to actively conspire with him against the Alliance and commit <PERSON>. This wasn't the only time she aided him mind you.\n\nThe first time she needed him, he told her to go take a hike because the conflict did not concern him. Then however showed up to stop her from destroying Orgrimmar in retaliation for the destruction of Theramore. \n\nBasically, unless you're an Orc you CANNOT, absolutely CANNOT bank on <PERSON> helping you in any kind of way no matter what. The <PERSON> and others had to find out the same thing. <PERSON> only got involved once <PERSON> started bringing down heat on the Orcs and messed with the Elements.", "212" ], [ "Training at that early an age isn't actually all that impressive. Sword fighting, bow shooting etc was trained at an incredible early age during the medieval. So that isn't really all that much of a gauge. \n\nWhat's interesting though is that [w 34][w 35] directly contradictor one another. One says they're strong enough to start hunting at 12-13. Which would hold true for a human aswell. The other one says <PERSON> was the size of an adult human at 6. This does not align.\n\nHumans are technically \"young adults\" by age 14-16. They still grow after that and develop but they can take care and survive on their own even before that and have reached sexual maturity.", "881" ], [ "Dunno, a lot of this stuff is almost 20+ years old. It's also contradictory. At one point it says Orcs can \"hunt on their own\" at age 12-13. Which humans in theory could to. Another author says <PERSON> was basically the size of an adult human at 6. \n\nThe authors and such seem to regularly contradict one another. At times you can even find mentions of \"litters\" which are never brought up or supported anywhere else.", "881" ], [ "I like how you ignore almost my entire post to go the \"colonizer evil route!\" ignoring general Troll savagery, xenophobia etc. \n\nLarge swaths of the EK where almost entirely uninhabitated by the time the humans arrived. The Trolls were still around but they didn't live in places like Lordaeron. Otherwise the humans wouldn't ever have been able to gain a foothold. They only came in contact with the Trolls as they slowly expanded. At which point they came into contact with the Trolls. \n\nThe Trolls reaction to this wasn't \"You stay over there, this place over here is ours!\" it was declaring war upon them.", "1022" ], [ "In the intro you hear <PERSON> tell <PERSON> that the Horde won a naval battle in front of Tanaris. This wasn't an actual battle, it was them running down Theramore refugees. \n\nDuring SoO, about where you find the Orcs training civilian Orcs, torturing the fat Panda guy whoms name I forgot and forcing the Goblins to dance for their amusement you also find them having leashed human women who are fighting each other bare fisted. When you engage the Orcs the Theramore Citizen also attack you yelling that they got their children.\n\nOthers have already been killed, used for target practice etc. I might be mistaken but I think the most of Theramore citizens we find in SoO are female, which gives some other unfortunate implications given how the old Horde acted during their initial invasion. \n\n_URL_0_", "1022" ], [ "And well, how did that work out? Mind you this isn't about any children or civilians they brought with them. Which still seems a tad odd and mostly was introduced later to explain how they could sustain themselves after the Dark Portal was closed.\n\nBut they had a bunch of people who commited heinous crimes, who tried to pretty much wipe out most of the people living on Azeroth and partly succeeded and that was if you were lucky. There's quite a number of half orcs in the lore who came about during this time and not exactly consensual. \n\nWe're not talking about people like <PERSON> who was a child here. We're talking about those who acted like a complete monsters. Most of whom ultimatively escaped custody, never faced any real consequences and often later on repeated their actions. You have some such as <PERSON> who genuinely regret them and tried to keep future generations from repeating them. That didn't work out very well. Many others however went straight back to it.\n\nWorse they and later generations still venerate people like <PERSON> and celebrate their actions and approach. Which directly contributed to the conflict under <PERSON> and likely to the one under <PERSON> now and the Orcs willingness to engage in these.", "212" ], [ "<PERSON> would actually have been a great choice for <PERSON>. He's one of the few Orcs who experienced most of these conflicts and who came away having learned a bunch of important lessons from them. \n\nHe was one of the few trying to teach <PERSON> and influence him for the better. One of the few who tried to stop stuff from going the way it has done TWICE now. \n\nThe problem is. He's burned out and obviously tired. He makes that much understood. Having seen the younger Orcs and <PERSON> go down the path they did likely didn't help, nor having his Son die during the Wrathgate and other stuff that happened since.", "475" ], [ "We have no idea what bargain she struck with <PERSON>, which is moot as <PERSON>'s dead anyway. We do know what her goal was however. <PERSON> KNOWS what waits for her once she dies, she has died and seen it before the Valkyr brought her back. Her crimes are as egrious as <PERSON> and she'll end up in the same place and with the same fate. \n\nShe's doing everything she can to avoid this. She's currently running out of dark Valkyr. So she was trying to subjugate <PERSON> who can create more Valkyr and resurrect people. Both to shield herself and possibly produce more/better forsaken given the dark Valkyr are effectively just an inferior copy of <PERSON>.", "474" ], [ "Last time I checked they still made a conscious choice and then added some more every step along the way. They might've been manipulated to an extent but they gleefully threw themselves at the task they were given and then excelled at cruelty and savagery far beyond simply wiping out their goals. \n\nYou know <PERSON> had an actual breeding program involving captured female Draenei for example? Which given the Orc warriors themselves did this stuff when they marauded through the landscape of Azeroth likely didn't take much effort on his part to set up. Can't really blame that on the Legion.", "1022" ], [ "Half-Orcs have been mentioned since the first war in various sources. So unless you think the human women were just charmed by the rugged apperance of the Orc warriors who just murdered their families and torched their villages, we can assume these did not come about consensually. \n\nThis stuff isn't exactly advertised for obvious reasons such as the game age ratings. But it's there in the supporting material and even referenced ingame albeit rather low key.", "1022" ], [ "1. Fully aware they retconned <PERSON> and the breeding program <PERSON> set up. This doesn't mean the Orc warriors would have not engaged in such behaviour. Saying it was \"solely for experiments\" makes it sound as if the involved Orcs were reluctant and only did so under duress, there's nothing to support this. \n\n2. While <PERSON> was retconned, which made sense as the whole time line and such didn't add up properly. The behaviour of the Orcs once they were through the portal wasn't for the most part. They still commtied these crimes and the existence of Half-Orcs in its entirety has not been retconned. Only some of them had their origin swapped around. \n\n3. \"Aka close to genocide\" was attempted genocide. It was the Orks goal and what the Burning Legion send them to Azeroth for in the first place. That a lot of the other stuff has been quietly swept under the rug and not been touted openly makes sense too. Since the game is T so 14+ while the movie is rated PG13. Actually spelling out the stuff they did and possibly doing so graphically wouldn't go over all that well. \n\nHeck many people missed the Theramore Citizens in SoO. How most of them are female. How they were used for target practice, others forced to fight each other to the death with their bare hands under duress of the Orcs holding their children captive. Children which are nowhere to be found and might not even be alive anymore.", "1022" ], [ "It's relatively normal. They cut the EU forums down to bare bones in general. I am not joking here. They cut out parts such as the \"Healing/Tank/DPS\" forums on EU and various other forums. \n\nCompare the EU Hearthstone forum to the US Hearthstone forum. The best thing about this is, the money they save this way should be absolutely neglible. They don't give a damn about their Eu customers and make that abundantly clear.", "437" ], [ "Eh, given how Allied races turn out so far. I can understand the Alliance being a tad pissed to be absolutely honest. 2 of ours had a huge impact on Legion and we're getting some pretty awesome ones such as Zandalari too.\n\nAlliance got, inferior elves with tentacles and no representation, fat humans and goats with slightly different beards.", "1022" ], [ "To be fair, Nightborne shouldn't have been Horde and Void Elfs never introduced. Void Elfs in their entirety just seem like some odd excuse to throw the Alliance a race as they had no idea what to do after they gave the Horde the Nightborne. \n\nIf anything, after losing Dalaran the Alliance has \"no magical faction\" anymore. Where the Horde now has two. With the Nightborne and Blood Elfs.", "436" ], [ "Kul'Tirans seem to be just as divisive. They're frankly speaking extremely unoriginal and seem more like a filler too. Up untill BfA they used regular human models whenever we've seen them. Now they made them slightly fatter. Which some people like for the males. Nobody I've seen has yet said anything positive about the females. Dark Iron seem to be the only great race but technically those were already Alliance just not playable. \n\nThe \"closests\" contender to \"mehness\" are arguably Highmountain Taurens. Who are very similar to regular Taurens. This however is mad up for by their Druid Forms. Which are quite distinctive and interesting. \n\nHere's the question. Do you think the Velves will get actual story developement, presentation and such in game? Because I kind of doubt that. So far they seem similar to the original BC Draenei and <PERSON>. Where they had to come up with something for the Alliance fairly late, threw it together in a few weeks and then shipped it out. \n\nI have exactly ONE Alliance character, a human rogue. Every other character of mine is <PERSON>. I'm looking forward A LOT to <PERSON> and such. When I look at the Alliance side so far, it seems like a bad joke. I know people still hold out hope for \"cool stuff\" like <PERSON> but so far it seems that isn't going to happen. Especially once they stated that \"parity\" and \"fairness\" are of no essence to them and they go by \"logic\" and \"what makes sense\" aka however they feel at that point in time.", "300" ], [ "I give you Dark Iron Dwarves. Only issue is. Lore wise they were already Alliance. And on the other hand you have Zandalari, Nightborne etc. \n\nThe other races are, uninspired and feel more like fillers. I know there's some people who like Kul'Tirans and they seem like they had some effort put into them unlike Velves and Lightforged. But up untill BfA those looked like regular Humans. They were never really \"distinct\" in any way. So suddenly introducing them as an Allied race kinda screams filler to me.", "1022" ], [ "People bitch because they feel the Nightborne need more customization options and such. They're still around surprisingly often given how new they are which speaks against them \"being complete shit\". Also, what other side? All but one of my characters are Horde. \n\nAnd so far the Allied races sans Dark Iron Dwarces are pretty lopsided in terms of story developement, representation and quality.", "435" ], [ "Except they accepted the Highborne back into the fold, which is why they can be mages now. The Horde under <PERSON> is also GONE and DEAD ever since <PERSON> took over. We had a brief resurgance under <PERSON> of similar ideals but it died right again under <PERSON>.\n\nOrks themselves are actually one of the least accepting races, as they've amply shown during Cataclysm and MoP persecuting most of the other Horde races for not being Orks. They're basically an entire race of Garithoses, with a few exceptions such as <PERSON> and <PERSON>.", "1022" ], [ "I'd still stick with Horde any day of the week though. I've leveled my first Alliance character back in Cataclysm to see the other side of the story. It's basically a depressing chain of defeats, stalemates and \"you can't hate the other faction!\" preaching by mayor characters. Their supposed victories are never actually shown in game but usually relegated to books and the likes. \n\nSure the Horde acts more evil but our victories are shown ingame, we regularly steamroll the Alliance and make them look like complete push overs. We kicked their teeth in all throughout Cataclysm and our \"loss\" at the end of Pandaria meant we kept EVERYTHING we gained up untill then and they walked away. \n\nBasically our choices in the game currently are. Mustache twirling evil but cool faction who is shown winning a lot but supposedly loses in the end with no consequences whatsoever. Faction that is wholly unaware it's at war most of the time, completely inept and can't win a battle to save their lifes but ends up winning becasue the story demands it at the end.", "435" ], [ "Because, technically they are. Being \"good\" isn't really all that fun, especially when you get your teeth kicked in and then preached to by that fat Panda as if both sides acted equally anyway. \n\nCataclysm was a completely one sided curbstomping. This continued in Pandaria with the Alliance appearing inept, incompetent and outright stupid/naive. Their victory was getting Dalaran (which went neutral again, never shown ingame to be Alliance) and supposedly winning the war. We kept everything from Azshara to Hillsbrad Foothills we claimed during the war. If Blizzard didn't tell us the Alliance won the war, one would assume it was a Horde victory.", "212" ], [ "* You can't really ignore places like Stonard, Gromgol Base Camp etc. \n* Alliance never had that many interesting/fleshed out leaders. So fewer to lose. The Alliance leadership used to be woefully underdeveloped. \n* Alliance are the good guys, they however most of the time lose. They only win the wars in the end and mostly because if we won they'd be gone. We'd finish them off no questions asked. Their wins however have never been shown ingame.\n* Alliance has become progressively weaker. Their \"strenght\" lies in supporting material and Blizzard telling us so. It's never shown in game where the Horde takes the aggressive/domineering position during the wars. Same for infrastructure, where the Alliance usually gets two tents and the Horde a huge base. \n* Unrelated to story. In EU aside from human racial the Horde has dominated for a long time.\n* developed/underdeveloped. Thunderbluff > All.\n* That's a personal preference. I just wished the snow would go away.\n* Hard to lose more than gain when they have so few to begin with, no?\n* \"Sack\" does not apply. There was no sacking done whatsoever. The Alliance played second fiddle in a Horde civil war. They came in, helped us a bit in disposing <PERSON> and then buggered off. They even conceded territory despite supposedly winning. \n* Legion is about... the Legion. Velen has a big role but that's basically it. Otherwise it's mostly the orders who are neutral. Broken Shore is Surama (Horde) and High Mountain (Horde). Greymane is tied with Sylvanas.", "436" ], [ "The only thing I find hilarious about this is how it flipped. It's likely not the same folk but we used to have regular \"Sylvanas did nothing wrong and is just misunderstood\" for the longest time. During Cataclysm for example. \n\nNow BfA comes around and she basically did not change all that much, it's just more center piece and the public opinion seems to have flipped completely. Or at least who dominates it. With many of the people who hate her... being Horde.", "759" ], [ "Aren't the Kirin Tor still neutral though? In theory they should revert to Alliance anyway, as the reason they \"worked with the Horde\" was the Legion. But after the last time they stuck around in neutral territory for the longest time. \n\nGiven that factions like the Nightborne and Highmountain Tauren stopped being neutral they should in theory default back to Alliance aswell. Doubt they will.", "436" ], [ "Honestly, I don't get this. There's a bunch of people who are upset with being evil. I personally don't see the issue with it, same as playing Sith in SWTOR. It's ultimatively a story and characters we're playing as, it's not real and thus good and evil don't really matter. It's about what one likes to play as and there's options for both. \n\nWhat I however find odd is when people fail to acknowledge certain characters acting in unjustifiable/evil ways even within the universe and it's ethics with one side being clearly worse than the other. Whether consumer or producer is besides the point, the latter however usually being worse. It tends to kill willing suspension of disbelief for me, when third parties act as if both sides are equally wrong or the \"bad guys\" are portrayed as designated villains.", "874" ], [ "*<PERSON> came around in Cataclysm. Classic, BC, <PERSON> he played no role. \n*<PERSON> many Alliance actively loathed her. Because up untill <PERSON> nuked her she was sabotaging the Alliance in her attempts to keep peace between Alliance and Horde. She also did zilch till <PERSON>\n*<PERSON> basically didn't exist till <PERSON><PERSON> did next to nothing from vanilla up untill around MoP. <PERSON> came back around in Cataclysm and instantly finger waggled the Alliance.\n\nAnd \"official novels\", yeah. No. I'm talking ingame here. The actual main story we're being portrayed in the game and experience ourselves.", "719" ], [ "TL;dr! No but in all honesty. <PERSON> are the outliers if anything. His Horde was the ONLY one that deviated from the usual modus operandi we've seen. \n\nI don't mind playing the bad guys personally, as long as the story is engaging and both sides are somewhat equal to make it an interesting fight. The Alliance however are just pushovers in most ingame instances where we're dealing with them. Worse, they aren't even allowed to be \"the good guys\", despite their faction being styled around it. Which means the Alliance LACKS any kind of proper identity and features. Which makes them a milquetoast opponent.", "874" ], [ "Not a fan of <PERSON> to be absolutely honest. In a way he's everything that's wrong with the Alliance and certain neutral factions to me. They act and behave as if the \"faction conflict is childish\" and \"they're above that\" before waggling their fingers at both sides. In most cases actively sabotaging and undermining the Alliance because they usually only get involved in pro Alliance factions. \n\nIt's ignoring how the aggression is mostly one sided, how there's a clear distinction in behaviour and goals between the factions. Imagine you and your friend stand around, some other guy walks up and starts beating up on you. You start fighting back defending yourself. Your friend instead of helping you screams how \"violence is not the way\" and how \"fighting is childish\". \n\nIt's like <PERSON> up untill the Horde nuked <PERSON>, like <PERSON> during Hyjal with his attitude contributing to the Darnassus camp fire all you can eat night elf buffet. Now <PERSON> has taken up that role. It makes me loath him.", "1007" ], [ "No, I'm merely not nitpicking the parts I like while ignoring all the others. Have you already forgotten <PERSON> and other Orcs and how they behave in Wc3? Have you forgotten how Orcs quite regularly behave in WoW ever since classic?\n\nYou're taking <PERSON> and <PERSON> and saying \"THIS! This is the Horde, these are Orcs!\" while ignoring that they're in the minority and the moment they're not in charge things go downhill.", "439" ], [ "\"We will never be slaves!\" screamed <PERSON> as he lovingly squeezed <PERSON> hand. The Orcs finally having broken free from the Legions thrall. Thunderous cheering of the surviving Orcs and Draenei answering him. Looking over at <PERSON> who gazed back at him lovestruck he knew that things would finally be alright. <PERSON> and <PERSON> coming together to create a future, together.", "718" ], [ "<PERSON> was a late change in her character, where she did a 180. People didn't take that well. Many weren't exactly fans of her to begin with and didn't buy it, which was justified as she flipped back to her previous peace mongering TWICE because she got some love from <PERSON>. Others didn't like it because she was now anti horde, especially Horde players. It's where all the dreadlord <PERSON> and \"deranged\" memes come from. \n\nThe novels are canon, they're also completely irrelevant to the story unfolding in the game as they're not reflected there and not experienced by the mayority of the player base. \"Sure, you didn't get any cake at the party, you never do. But there's some dry bread in the kitchen if you'd like. You can nibble on that later!\"", "1011" ], [ "Wat. You're putting words in my mouth I've never said and making a bad comparison to boot to dismiss those. \n\n<PERSON> got no screentime in Classic, BC and Wotlk. Because he wasn't part of the story up untill then. He also IS NOT the counter part to <PERSON>. Goblins and Worgen are matched nowhere. I've never said he got \"little story\" after he was introduced. He got quite a bit. Mostly because he and the Worgen were matched with <PERSON> and the Forsaken. \n\n<PERSON> is matched with <PERSON>. Goblins with Gnomes. Both are more or less ignored the same. If you want to compare <PERSON> with <PERSON> for some odd reason, then you'd have to compare <PERSON> with <PERSON> and you'd find it evenly matched again.", "280" ], [ "Never said the body builder is weak and or slow. He's still at a disadvantage against plate armor and a sword. Constitution doesn't save you from a sword. Unless you use it to run. \n\nAnd while Orcs are physically stronger, they used to be shown as far less bright. Exceptions exist of course, more talking about the average Orc. And their advantage is often overstated, with some people claiming they \"can punch through plate armor\". They're showin as stronger and sturdier but not to that extent. Being vastly outmatched by the actual \"buff guys\" such as <PERSON> and <PERSON> and closer to humans in a direct comparison.", "498" ], [ "The Trolls are actally pretty cool, same as the Tauren. The ones being \"evil\" and stirring up trouble are usually the Orcs and Undead. The Undead have been this way since the get go, they just weren't the most prominent in the lore. Orcs always had issues, it was <PERSON> that used to reign them in. You'd need <PERSON> or the likes in charge to keep the Orcs from acting up.", "1022" ], [ "Oh, it's apparently now actually becoming a thing. Young women are now increasingly outearning their male peers. Apparently if you try to fix something that does not exist, it will have an actual impact across the board. Not only raising the wages of some regardless of hours worked and circumstances leading to lower pay but also those who do not have these circumstances yet/wont thus leading to them earning more for the same work.", "867" ], [ "Both Goblins and Worgen are overdue for an update. They're now vastly older than classic characters were when they got their overhaul. It's supposed to happen \"SoonTM\" but has been pushed back since about WoD. \n\nThe \"bones\" that make up the <PERSON> and Goblin skeletons for example are FAR lower than the ones of the reworked and newly added races. And by that I mean by several factors. Which is important for everyhing from facial animations to how the bodies move. The same goes for Polygon count and the likes. The difference is about as big as classic vs cataclysm in terms of how much of an improvement there is.", "300" ] ]
298
[ 337, 5375, 21677, 18560, 12017, 24191, 2113, 2, 17786, 4489, 4171, 5763, 384, 1529, 8151, 11952, 1941, 2457, 14575, 22820, 4882, 5396, 1407, 2937, 4971, 23106, 25333, 11971, 14816, 4302, 10749, 16365, 12812, 11981, 3162, 8745, 11262, 17488, 1726, 12028, 15243, 7352, 7750, 5913, 24382, 7074, 13237, 11005, 3512, 9621, 3294, 15959, 14877, 8141, 3857, 1636, 10365, 2998, 24604, 17953, 6925, 4836, 2404, 136, 14118, 2031, 20284, 22730, 11762, 3746, 25243, 18737, 10460, 7304, 6585, 3316, 7995, 1931, 18414, 20001, 9488, 8590, 1174, 6507, 17281, 1961, 9267, 10615, 1360, 21938, 6574, 5216, 14046, 11091, 2783, 18530, 14196, 24481, 2045, 12365, 3467, 13640, 11809, 7022, 811, 804, 23029, 18832, 10612, 10238, 7253, 1124, 11788, 7320, 12360, 9666, 12531, 18459, 16233, 13962, 8884, 6293, 4764, 16899, 14162, 20882, 14028, 4332, 3097, 7073, 6872, 8867, 14132, 12491, 2603, 3654, 12426, 12470, 18155, 8629, 1834, 13302, 711, 8532, 12482, 7233, 7544, 6245, 3822, 5649, 25059, 2085, 5777, 1020, 13004, 17109, 5108, 8245, 12508, 25417, 12761, 9079, 918, 2117, 6148, 2932, 13122, 5093, 12573, 8896, 8960, 25284, 6077, 11760, 1891, 11263, 9801, 14280, 9151, 12590, 7498, 8952, 2855, 10308, 1280, 5948, 12040, 4783, 11554, 2105, 1057, 13321, 13418, 20, 10673, 1279, 3457, 5668, 14703, 20531, 2579, 20467, 23252, 10783, 6258, 21343, 13482, 2417, 4872, 21353, 3102, 2976, 1463, 14477, 19916, 7082, 2120, 11338, 14897, 695, 8749, 11622, 5067, 7530, 7650, 20295, 10646, 11461, 10376, 13734, 4711, 5886, 9740, 11098, 283, 9026, 6529, 20209, 12931, 3714, 9925, 13244, 5716, 6251, 2705, 13246, 10551, 11866, 11758, 1895, 24102, 2347, 23227, 18864, 9559, 7121, 12026, 22373, 1981, 10778, 594, 9539, 23889, 19429, 883, 3114, 17099, 24109, 10833, 830, 3205, 20942, 3355, 3389, 4665, 9361, 19019, 20330, 8913, 2488, 13262, 4183, 7188, 9890, 5325, 14542, 10980, 14835, 11701, 12070, 8553, 19132, 2634, 3397, 21617, 16950, 2348, 15282, 10967, 18898, 12790, 14292, 12810, 13185, 16150, 24812, 1621, 24763, 1628, 13897, 1960, 2958, 3833, 7204, 4984, 10986, 10313, 8626, 12003, 19050, 7318, 3468, 3419, 19071, 9378, 6670, 15668, 14787, 8319, 9454, 19377, 745, 8916, 13932, 2216, 11332, 12805, 10675, 23154, 4599, 7249, 9381, 10074, 10738, 3293, 7291, 1295, 19693, 13926, 2385, 13811, 2072, 24228, 17675, 19759, 12467, 14177, 9296, 10786, 7863, 8272, 11965, 12460, 23121, 8995, 3075, 4891, 1343, 11932, 5321, 9432, 17009, 9406, 14682, 18236, 917, 4088, 15482, 4570, 8980, 21340, 3451, 11422, 4568, 7738, 6630, 9716, 8499, 14368, 19516, 9596, 2923, 5378, 14021, 14544, 22591, 21248, 8855, 13360, 11769, 21183, 1808, 14348, 7020, 11694, 6907, 10812, 11906, 7916, 4136, 18274, 20149, 15646, 14672, 12190, 7701, 20898, 9813, 10040, 733, 14663, 19421, 4976, 17966, 16843, 10133, 13428, 7492, 8581, 3862, 13228, 4329, 3984, 1207, 7289, 17245, 17554, 412, 1261, 8698, 9077, 9803, 25347, 6575, 21201, 747, 8648, 6206, 21276, 17355, 21023, 9348, 21104, 5892, 21252, 7305, 14793, 25543, 5012, 3911, 14188, 22874, 25433, 8514, 12118, 18705, 20676, 3638, 11215, 15918, 9568, 16341, 13867, 21189, 23152, 8207, 11494, 10085, 5001, 693, 12717, 12957, 9110, 11452, 5702, 11905, 4069, 8224, 2119, 2400, 7593, 915, 13281, 7451, 23775, 14843, 9455, 4535, 12988 ]
reddit_dump_-UserRemoved-
[ [ "Huh, I guess I never thought of calling them that. I believe most just refer to \"horizontal\" coolers as low profile or SFF coolers.\n\nNone of these will be much of a step up from the stock cooler. Unless you were very space restricted and need every last bit of thermal overhead, I wouldn't go for one.\n\nThe alternative is generally referred to as a tower cooler. Given heat dissipation is relative to surface area (general statement), tower coolers will offer better performance. This would be a better route, however it would also be unnecessary unless you plan on overclocking and/or the stock cooler is too loud. Fitment would need to be verified given your relative smaller case.", "81" ], [ "> they recommend 1060, but that's nowhere to buy for normal price new\n\n1060 has been obsolete for some time now, so buying new is only getting more unlikely by the day.\n\nAs the game has not been released yet, we don't have actual performance metrics to go by, any suggestions would be pure guesses as far as performance.\n\nThe best you can do is buy the card that best fits your budget, and provides performance that you want in the games you currently play. We would at least need to know your budget though if you want a rec.", "757" ], [ "There's nothing wrong with Z370, I've run my 9900k on Z370 boards just fine for a few years now. The issue is the Pro4 is pretty darn low end, which would be fine for stock but might cause issues like high VRM temps or higher voltages than needed, which in turn can cause high CPU temps.\n\n > So if I were to hypothetically start from scratch with whatever the newest gen mobo is and a 9900k\n\nYou can only use 300 series with 9900k, so Z370 and Z390. Current gen is Z490, and only works with 10th gen.\n\n > So if I were to hypothetically start from scratch with whatever the newest gen mobo is and a 9900k, I would always need aftermarket cooling better than the hyper 212?\n\nYes, mobo makes a difference when we're talking about overclocking, espeically higher end overclocking. As the CPU cooler cools the CPU, you spec it out based on CPU, not mobo.", "81" ], [ "You know they make M.2 Sata drives right? \n\n[PCPartPicker Part List](_URL_0_/list/YpvVLJ)\n\nType|Item|Price\n:----|:----|:----\n**Storage** | [Western Digital Blue 500 GB 2.5\" Solid State Drive](_URL_0_/product/rcRFf7/western-digital-blue-500gb-25-solid-state-drive-wds500g1b0a) | $64.95 @ Amazon \n**Storage** | [Western Digital Blue 500 GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive](_URL_0_/product/6j448d/western-digital-blue-500gb-m2-2280-solid-state-drive-wds500g2b0b) | $59.99 @ Amazon \n | *Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts* |\n | **Total** | **$124.94**\n | Generated by [PCPartPicker](_URL_0_) 2020-10-20 10:46 EDT-0400 |\n\nI mean, the P1 should be right around the same price as a quality Sata drive so why not at that point.\n\nI don't think your Sata ports and M.2 ports share bandwidth, but I would still double check your manual prior to purchasing.", "448" ], [ "Read/write speeds are advertised for sequential speeds, and are pretty irrelevant for load and boot times as you generally aren't loading massive files but rather a bunch of smaller ones.\n\nThis means NVMe vs Sata SSDs make very little difference, if any at all. You can look up benchmarks comparing the 2, there are probably hundreds at this point. It's certainly not a noticeable difference, especially given your workload is gaming.\n\nWhich makes what you're asking incredibly trivial and 100% not anything that will be noticeable.", "448" ], [ "Hence why I said almost every mobo instead of all. Even so, splitters are cheaper and far more common than fans that still use molex. In the post you linked, I'd still say splitter is the correct response. If ya can't spare $5 to properly wire your PC fans, then I'm not sure why you're building a PC in the first place.", "81" ], [ "Have you custom looped before? I mean, it's not any easier than other SFF cases.\n\nThe only SFF case that's a tad easier to loop in is the NR200 IMO, as well as some of the slightly larger cases like TU150, A1plus, or Jonsbo UMX1 (which is what I'm currently running). When you get that small, they're all just as difficult.\n\nYou may also want to check out the Loque Ghost for the modular top hat which makes looping easier.", "144" ], [ "Motherboards don't change gaming performance.\n\nBetter motherboards are more suited for overclocking, using better/more VRMs for more stable and clean power delivery.\n\nZ390-E is a midrange board IMO, Z390 Master is a high end board. Either one is fine for standard overclocking with a 9900k. \n\n > Is there any difference between the gaming performance when overclocked and when not overclocked.\n\nIn CPU bound games, there might be a difference on paper but it won't be anything noticeable with your FPS counter turned off.", "121" ], [ "9700k and 9900k perform nearly identical, which makes 9700k better value.\n\nIf you need the extra threads, 3700X will provide a similar gaming experience while also being cheaper than 9900k, with an upgrade path using the same mobo. There is no upgrade path with a 9900k.\n\nConsoles have nothing to do with PCs. There's a reason why Rockstar takes over a year to release games on PC compared to console.", "153" ], [ "I bought mine on BF for $350 at BestBuy. I've seen that same sale every year since that monitor was released.\n\nThis was great back when you had to get Gsync, but as Freesync is available to all it doesn't make much sense to spend that much unless you really really want Gsync.\n\nThe monitor itself would be good for $200, but it kinda under-delivers on everything but Gsync and motion blur. Colors and viewing angles are meh.\n\nI would shop around for 1440/144Hz monitors to see what you can get new first, or wait until BF and see what other sales are out there.", "989" ], [ "Dolby Digital and DTS are more home theater standards, it's not anything we really deal with for PCs.\n\nAlso, headphones don't need 5.1 or 7.1, that wouldn't even be possible in headphones as that's an odd number of drivers and headphones have 2 sides.\n\nIf you're watching a lot of movies and such, then DD/DTS might be more beneficial to have, but for games and other media consumption it's not necessary or needed.\n\nAs onboard sound on motherboards nowadays are pretty darn good, so sound cards are rather obsolete at this point. If you want better quality sound, external DACs and AMPs are preferred, although typically you would also want higher end audiophile headphones to match.", "329" ], [ "Your post title is: What SSD NVMe M. 2 should I buy?\n\nMy response is, NVMe vs Sata makes no difference, so buy whatever SSD you want.\n\n > But I kind felt that my SSD is lagging behind. Windows and games are loading slower, and I am looking for upgrading my XPG GAMMIX 512GB S11.\n\nFirst off, your SSD is not lagging behind. If I slapped my 8 year old Sata SSD into a PC and my 970pro NVMe into another identical PC, you probably couldn't tell me which is which. \n\nIf your PC feels slower, it's likely because you filled your SSD up too much, which will happen with ANY drive. \n\nBuying an expensive NVMe isn't going to do anything for your as you aren't benefiting from the increased sequential speeds. My literal advice was don't overspend here as any SSD (including Sata) will provide minimal load times. Which also directly answers your question \"So what is the possible best option right now for my rig?\". Buy another drive so your primary isn't filled to the brim, and don't overspend on speed you aren't using.", "448" ], [ "> So question number one is what is the surround standard for PC's that isn't DTS or DD based?\n\nI believe for movies it's still DD/DTS, i'm not the person to ask on this though as I don't consume that much media on PC, and I haven't run > 2 channel audio on PC for well over a decade. Compression standards mean nothing to your average PC user. \n\n > How does Surround sound work in games with surround sound, especially since Creative EAX is outdated - most I see are using the industry standards like DD / DTS - this has been the way since I bought my first surround system for my PC in 1999 to full enjoy 'Thief' (Creative / Cambridge labs 5.1)\n\nIt's all simulated in headphones, given each ear can only hear respective drivers. For speakers, you don't need to simulate as noise from the direction is subject to both ears. In headphones, the delay from one ear to the other needs to be simulated. In all games that require directional sound, this is simulated by changing tone, wavelength, and delay.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n_URL_1_\n\nIf you have multi-channel speakers and want better audio than onboard, then go ahead with a sound card. PCIe sound cards will likely be taking CPU lanes away from your GPU though, if that matters to you.", "872" ], [ "For QL's I can understand the need for that given only 1 channel works. It's a bit redundant to have both lighting node and commander though if all you need are lighting channels. I guess if you really had a lot of RGB. \n\nI'm not using my commander at all, currently it's 6 fans into lighting node and 4 RGB strips into other channel. 9 fans total running on mobo headers, RGB for lighting node controlled by iCue and that's it. (I have 3 LL's without RGB running currently as they're external to the case).", "333" ], [ "Use the onboard sound, if it's not good enough then upgrade. What other people say should not influence your opinion here, they're not the ones using it.\n\nAs the other user mentioned, external DAC is generally preferred for ease and quality. The A5+ are good but I notice zero difference between my mobo onboard and better DACs. Generally, I hear the differences when running headphones, or higher end tower/bookshelf speakers.", "329" ], [ "Uh... depends on how much you smoke around your PC and how much you care I guess.\n\nI mean, I had a PC I didn't really care much about (super budget build in college), didn't clean it for about 2-3 years. It was nasty, still worked somehow though. Had I cared, probably once every month would be needed to keep it in reasonable condition.\n\nIf it was my PC now, I would not have smoked around it and just gone outside. It does irreversable/uncleanable damage and stains your parts. Probably have to clean it every day to ensure there is no sign of smoking.", "568" ], [ "Honestly, it's not too difficult if you want to, like really want to. I think you know the conviction I'm talking about given you're in the same situation. In retrospect, the hardest part is the extra time and not knowing what to do with it lol.\n\nI used to think stuff like \"I can't enjoy this meal if I don't have a cig after\" or \"waking up would super suck if I didn't have a cig\". That always kept me smoking, dreading the alternative. Tried quitting numerous times before, but even my \"I'm really going to this time\" speaches to myself did nothing, those thoughts really were harmful to my goal. Tried the gum, patches, vape, etc... It's a mental addiction more than anything though, IMO.\n\nAround last year Christmas, I was just over it. I think the key for me was realizing the negatives were far outweighing the positives, and I was reaching a point of no return. I really thought on that hard, for a couple days. I used to play lots of sports, that is something I'm working hard to get back at, I went from being really in shape to being that guy that wasn't sure if he could finish a basic hike in the woods. Friends were sick of my \"smoke breaks\". Constantly hiding the smell, sneaking off, etc... Life is easier if I just don't smoke. Literally had a panic attack. \n\nNext day, didn't tell anyone I quit, just decided to stop buying cigs, bought lots of gum instead. I used to think telling others I quit would help, because they would hold me to it, and call me out (which they did). That's meaningless. Self-accountability is the only way. I wanted to quit, I was going to quit, and that was that. It was between me, and my habits.\n\nFrom there, honestly wasn't too bad. First week obviously sucked, your body still wants it, your habits are still there, you feel like you need to and you're forgetting something all the time. After that, my habits changed, and you slowly forget about it until it's maybe one or two urges a week, which is relatively easy to handle. For me, that will probably never go away, but it's easier every time. \n\nMy advice, you can only quit by doing it for yourself. If you truly want to, and I don't mean just what you tell yourself, but if you truly convince yourself you don't want to, it's not anything that's difficult. It's the mental switch from \"I want to\" to \"I'm going to\" that's really hard, and I wish there were actual words I can say to help here, but there isn't because it's a literal internal battle.", "568" ], [ "Just to make you aware, response time and input latency are not the same thing. Response time deals with motion blur and ghosting, and advertised numbers can largely be ignored as they're pretty meaningless. Input latency is not anything that is advertised, as there are many many more factors between your mouse sensor and your display output. \n\nAs we don't know how you feel (I personally feel no difference going between my monitors, except in Rocket League), it's really quite impossible to advise here.\n\nYou can use sites like _URL_0_ that have specific tests for input latency, and create your own opinion and buy from there.", "989" ], [ "> PSU Corsair HX1200i -140 euro (B stock, discount for missing cables , I have spares anyway)\n\nWhy not get a new PSU for same or cheaper? You don't need 1200W for this, and PSU cables are not universal. Should you need to buy new cables, that's not cheap. \n\n > I don't think the 8 core option offers a good bang for buck although benchmarks might prove me wrong.\n\nGiven your workload is gaming, I'm a bit confused here. There is nothing bargain about 3900X/3080 build, you're literally shopping top end parts. If you wanted to save money, the PCIe4.0 NVMe drive could have easily been scratched, you paid extra there (even on sale) for no real benefit.\n\nThere is no reason to believe the 5600X wouldn't be good enough for modern gaming, unless it somehow is worse than the 2600 or 3600 before it. As it's not actually real to us yet, we can't advise. If 3900X is too much, why not 3700X? I mean, benchmarks show these 2 are very close for gaming workloads.", "592" ], [ "In context to this post, that's kinda irrelevant though. Those benchmarks are showing synthetic tests. \n\nYou are right about DRAM, as you generally get 1GB per 1TB of storage (exceptions like 660p is 256GB regardless). Again though, in the context of this post, it's likely not going to make any mentionable difference. \n\nI guess I could see more NAND chips making a difference, but I have yet to see any gaming benchmarks that show this. Was hoping you had some solid data here in relation to context.", "448" ], [ "So here is what you need to do. Start with rereading the instructions as they have pictures to help you see what needs to be done.\n\nThe stock cooler installation involved removing the stock mounting brackets, and screwing the cooler directly to the backplate.\n\nYou need the stock mounting brackets here, hopefully you stored them in a safe place. That gets reinstalled back onto the board.\n\nYou then install the AM4 brackets onto the AIO cooler head, which then clip under the stock mounting bracket and get tightened using the thumbscrews.", "81" ], [ "Single fan AIOs perform as well as lower mid range air cooler (which is undersized for a 9900k anyways) while also costing twice as much. They are also rather noisy, which is counter productive for the only other practical benefit that AIO's can provide. The only instance where I could see a single fan AIO being beneficial is in small form factor builds where it may be the biggest cooler option that will fit.\n\nHaving the biggest thermal overhead is the point in overclocking as stability is dependent on multiplier and voltage. I would at least get a 280mm if you want to overclock a 9900k.\n\nIf you're that stingy, air cooling would be far better value. Top end air coolers like NHD15 or DRP4 would be roughly $80-85.", "81" ], [ "> Can I fit one x4 and one x3 of these in my build\n\nx3? Do you mean PCIe4.0 and PCIe3.0?\n\nWhat are you using these drives for?\n\nPer the spec page as well as the motherboard manual (_URL_0_):\n\n- 2x M.2 slots (Key M)\n\n- M2_1 slot (from AMD Processor)\n\n- Supports PCIe 4.0/ 3.0 x4 1\n\n- Supports SATA 6Gb/s\n\n- Supports 2242/ 2260/ 2280/ 22110 storage devices\n\n- M2_2 slot (from AMD B550 chipset)\n\n- Supports PCIe 3.0x4\n\n- Supports 2242/ 2260/ 2280 storage devices\n\nBoth M.2 slots support NVMe so yes, it will work.", "968" ], [ "I don't know your workload, but you probably will want to research into whether or not you're even benefitting from NVMe. Most people using the drive for general use and gaming are not benefitting from NVMe in any meaningful way compared to any other Sata SSD. Taking it another step further with Gen4.0 isn't going to change that. Unless you have a need for sustained sequential read/writes, don't overspend on a drive you aren't benefitting form.", "448" ], [ "There is no way a bottleneck calculator can give any accurate result.\n\nEvery game uses your CPU and GPU differently (and those aren't the only 2 components utilized either). This means the bottleneck in every game will vary, and can easily change depending on user settings as well.\n\nSo anything \"calculator\" that spits out a single number to represent the concept of a bottleneck is a rough guesstimation at best, or they just don't understand what a bottleneck actually is.", "430" ], [ "Future proof is spending real money on a chance that future games can leverage sequential speeds to improve load times, as no current games benefit much. Chances are by the time that happens (if it ever happens), NVMe will be standard in PCs.\n\nSamsung makes industry leading drives in terms of performance and reliability, however none of uses you listed will benefit from that. Any SSD would be just fine. I would suggest a M.2 Sata drive like MX500 or WD Blue, or a cheap NVMe with DRAM like P1 or 660p.", "448" ], [ "> are the new Ryzen CPU's competitive with Intel?\n\nDepends on the application, but in general yes. Go gaming, Intel still has the edge but CPU isn't too big of a deal. Going Ryzen isn't going to make the game unplayable by any means\n\nI would upgrade GPU btw, as that's where you will see the biggest improvement. Your CPU is currently still very capable, upgrading wouldn't do a whole lot for most games. I would recommend a 1070 Ti, but I don't know your budget or monitor you are running", "153" ], [ "I know you're probably set on a white theme there but here's potentially how cheap you can get it w/o losing performance\n\n[PCPartPicker part list](_URL_2_) / [Price breakdown by merchant](_URL_1_)\n\nType|Item|Price\n:----|:----|:----\n**CPU** | [Intel - Core i5-8400 2.8GHz 6-Core Processor](_URL_6_) | $178.89 @ OutletPC \n**Motherboard** | [Gigabyte - B360 HD3 ATX LGA1151 Motherboard](_URL_0_) | $87.98 @ Newegg \n**Memory** | [Patriot - Viper Elite 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR4-2400 Memory](_URL_4_) | $80.99 @ Amazon \n**Storage** | [Toshiba - OCZ TR200 240GB 2.5\" Solid State Drive](_URL_8_) | $61.44 @ OutletPC \n**Storage** | [Western Digital - Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5\" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive](_URL_5_) | $43.85 @ OutletPC \n**Video Card** | [EVGA - GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB GAMING Video Card](_URL_9_) | $294.88 @ OutletPC \n**Case** | [NZXT - S340 (White) ATX Mid Tower Case](_URL_3_) | $49.99 @ Newegg \n**Power Supply** | [EVGA - SuperNOVA G3 550W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply](_URL_10_) | $49.99 @ Newegg \n | *Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts* |\n | Total (before mail-in rebates) | $888.01\n | Mail-in rebates | -$40.00\n | **Total** | **$848.01**\n | Generated by [PCPartPicker](_URL_7_) 2018-04-23 10:32 EDT-0400 |", "15" ], [ "No point getting Z370, as you can't OC that CPU anyways\n\n[PCPartPicker part list](_URL_2_) / [Price breakdown by merchant](_URL_0_)\n\nType|Item|Price\n:----|:----|:----\n**CPU** | [Intel - Core i5-8400 2.8GHz 6-Core Processor](_URL_10_) | $226.50 @ Vuugo \n**Motherboard** | [Gigabyte - B360 HD3 ATX LGA1151 Motherboard](_URL_3_) | $108.99 @ PC-Canada \n**Memory** | [G.Skill - Aegis 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 Memory](_URL_9_) | $108.99 @ Newegg Canada \n**Storage** | [Samsung - 850 EVO-Series 250GB 2.5\" Solid State Drive](_URL_8_) | $149.50 @ Vuugo \n**Storage** | [Seagate - Barracuda 2TB 3.5\" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive](_URL_1_) | $72.95 @ Vuugo \n**Video Card** | [EVGA - GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB GAMING Video Card](_URL_4_) | $399.99 @ Memory Express \n**Case** | [DIYPC - Ranger-R8-G ATX Mid Tower Case](_URL_5_) | $54.99 @ Newegg Canada \n**Power Supply** | [BitFenix - Formula Gold 450W 80+ Gold Certified ATX Power Supply](_URL_7_) | $79.99 @ Newegg Canada \n | *Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts* |\n | **Total** | **$1201.90**\n | Generated by [PCPartPicker](_URL_6_) 2018-04-23 11:49 EDT-0400 |", "15" ], [ "Here's the thing, bottlenecking is a stupid term that the industry uses. It's reckless, in fact, that they use it so often. You will inevitably experience bottlenecking, regardless of your setup, one part of your system will always be the slowest. But here's the thing, EVERY program, application, game, etc uses CPU and GPU differently. You could get the best CPU in the world, and it'll bottleneck your GPU, and vice versa. To worry about bottlenecking is a waste of time and energy, unless you decide to build a different computer for every single thing you do on your PC.\n\nWith that said, the most important thing when considering upgrades is to determine if your build is balanced enough. You don't want to put a 1080Ti with a FX4300 for example, as they are on the opposite ends of the spectrum. With your current build, you're looking at a low to mid range CPU, with a mid range GPU, so you are going to be just fine. Now lets say you are playing a MMORPG, and you know the CPU is the weakest link. Sure upgrading your CPU would probably go a long way, but realize you would be spending hundreds of dollars so that one game would perform better. At that point, if you figure it's the weakest link on many games, then spending the hundreds may be worth it, but as of now, getting another mid range CPU wouldn't benefit you all that much.", "153" ], [ "Now this is where an upgrade starts making more sense, your money would go a much longer way if we start considering applications that you use regarding music production. I do believe music production programs tend to favor single core speeds, so you may want to keep that in mind.\n\nGood luck bud, let us know if you have any more questions", "153" ], [ "First things first, all those headers function in the same way. The *only* difference is the current rating per header. As a general rule of thumb, standard fan headers will be able to handle up to 1A. Pump headers generally can handle a bit more, but they are all 12V with same pinout.\n\nTo check current ratings, look in your motherboard manual and it will provide amps per header. Then, check your fans/pump for the current draw (generally .15A-.2A for a fan). If you're looking at just one component per header, this isn't anything you should really be concerned with. If using a splitter, total current is sum of all currents in a parallel circuit.\n\nNot sure if that RGB will work. In the world of RGB, not much is compatible with eachother.", "542" ], [ "A single exhaust fan isn't going to make much difference, and there are plenty of reviews to confirm that as well. Going from one 140mm, and replacing it with another 140mm fan isn't going to make his system run a significant amount cooler. especially if the original was a stock fan. At most, we're talking a couple degrees C, this is a realistic expectation. Telling him to spend an extra $10-20 for a fan to drop his system temps by 2C is unrealistic. Not to mention, you shouldn't be running fans at full blast, no one does that anymore. \n\nWhat you should be telling him to do is balance his airflow, as that is much much more important than what fans he sticks in there, especially case fans.", "81" ], [ "Since your setup is pretty new, you are most likely running 4 pin fans and 4 pin headers. The pinout is as follows: Gound, 12V, Tach, PWM.\n3 Pin fans/headers do not have the PWM portion, and are voltage regulated to achieve specific speeds. The PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) basically tells the fan how fast to spin, hence is much easier to control fan speed than using voltage", "81" ], [ "> So plugging a 4 pin fan into any 4 of these headers would yield the same results?\n\nYes, they will all supply 12V, with speed adjustment done via PWM\n\n > I believe the Fractal fans that came with my case are both 3-pin, so they are most likely not adjusting, but running at a static speed?\n\nBy default, yes. 12V is always supplied through the header, so speed will be static. *However*, many motherboards now also allow speed adjustment through voltage regulation (labeled DC control in your BIOS). You generally can't fine tune like you can with PWM, but if yours is like my mobo, it allows me to set speeds according to 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% voltage", "81" ], [ "> having a aftermarket cpu cooler isn't a bad idea\n\nFor most people on a budget, the money saved instead of buying a cooler can go a long way. Getting an aftermarket cooler in no way guarantees lower running temps, and you're looking at the top end coolers as the only option that provides a sizable difference in cooling capacity.\n\n > Reduces running temps and over all higher running temps degrades more than lower temps.\n\nAgain, not entirely true. What they do is decrease the delta T (change in temp in relation to ambient) by increase thermal dissapation. However, to lower temps would assume the heat produced is near the max tdp of the stock cooler, which for many is not the case. Also, in theory, excess heat does degrade electronics, but these chips are designed to run up to 90-95C, meaning if you are running at 65C and your friend is running at 80C, the difference in longevity of the CPUs is negligible, not to mention untestable as *every* CPU is different than the next (hence the silicon lottery). The reality is, even if this were true, components around the PC will fail or the PC will be so outdated it would require replacement, before a CPU running at acceptable temperatures will fail.", "81" ], [ "1. Maybe, although I would recommend at least 4 cores. You may benefit from higher single core speeds across the four cores rather than lower speeds across more cores. Either way, I've used Matlab since college (2005) and it's not exactly demanding, hardware wise. I would definitely recommend 16gb of RAM or more though (MathWorks recommends 4gb per core)\n\n2. Absolutely use an SSD for boot drive, it speeds everything up and makes everything smoother. Regardless of application, SSD for boot drive is something I will always recommend.", "127" ], [ "It's a battery backup. \n\nIn the event of a power outage, it'll keep your PC running for a few minutes extra. If you're working on something important, this gives you time to save your work and shut down the PC properly.\n\nMany will also have built in line conditioning for people in areas with dirty or inconsistent power.\n\nGenerally speaking, most users that don't experience brownouts or blackouts often in their area won't find much use for them, as they can tend to be rather expensive. A good surge protector is usually enough.", "1006" ], [ "Consoles and PCs do not compare...\n\nWhen developers code for consoles, they have one set of hardware they need to account for.\n\nWhen they code for PCs, they need to ensure the experience is playable across a spectrum of hardware. \n\nAny SSD, either NVMe or Sata, will provide minimal load times. You can look up benchmarks to confirm before spending extra money on something that likely won't benefit you.", "217" ], [ "8700k is a really good CPU still, and it's not very old. It's among the best as far as gaming performance goes, higher end CPUs at this point are just one small step up. There are plenty of benchmarks comparing 9900k to 8700k/9700k, you can look those up to verify expected difference. \n\nI mean, it's your PC so I'm not trying to convince you how to spend your money, but it certainly would make more sense to upgrade when the CPU is actually lacking (basically if you have uses that can leverage > 6c/12t), or at least another generation when Intel (hopefully) updates their architecture, or AMD moves to AM5. At that point, justifying hundreds of dollars would actually net a performance increase worthy of that money, IMO.", "153" ], [ "Hello, and thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed. Please note the following from our [subreddit rules](_URL_2_):\n\n**Rule 6 : No submissions about sales, deals or unofficial giveaways**\n\n > * To find or share sales and deals, visit /r/buildapcsales. \n > * For queries about upcoming sales, please use the [stickied simple questions thread.](_URL_1_)\n\n**Rule 8 : No submission titles that are all-caps, clickbait, PSAs, or pro-tips**\n\n > This includes titles containing emoji, asking to be upvoted or not upvoted, PSAs, LPTs, \"pro tips\", \"reminders\" and all other common tactics attempting to draw extra attention to the title.\n\n\n\nThank you.\n\n---\n\n[^(Click here to message the moderators if you have any questions or concerns)](_URL_0_)", "477" ], [ "Hello, and thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed. Please note the following from our [subreddit rules](_URL_2_):\n\n**Rule 6 : No submissions about sales, deals or unofficial giveaways**\n\n > * To find or share sales and deals, visit /r/buildapcsales. \n > * For queries about upcoming sales, please use the [stickied simple questions thread.](_URL_1_)\n\n**Rule 10 : No self-promotion, begging, advertising or surveys**\n\n > This includes self-serving/affiliate links, advertisements of your own services/content/fundraising, or begging of any form.\n\n\n\nThank you.\n\n---\n\n[^(Click here to message the moderators if you have any questions or concerns)](_URL_0_)", "804" ], [ "Yes, if you have other uses. We all justify our purchases differently.\n\nThere are also factors like 1% lows that can paint a better picture of user experience.\n\nInstead of worrying about bottlenecks, you should research a bit more into what they are and how they actually effect you. Bottlenecks are inevitable, and obviously vary per game/program/application (as well as your personal settings) as usage of your components are not universal.\n\nIf you have any sort of budget, 3090 shouldn't be considered. It's not really even a gaming GPU, just marketed that way so more people will buy it.", "757" ], [ "You aren't really benefitting from NVMe to begin with (based on your mentioned uses) so the Samsung drive doesn't seem worth it to me.\n\nThe additional speeds here are primarily in sequential read/writes, which means they're intended for people working with large, single files (think 4k video editting or transferring). The other benefit is reliability, which also isn't a concern if you aren't doing daily sustained read/writes.\n\nCrucial P1 would be fine, and wouldn't make any noticeable differences compared to 970Evo or any Sata SSD for that matter (fractions of a second for most cases compared to any NVMe). Crucial P2 does not have DRAM, so I wouldn't suggest that if general use is your intention.", "448" ], [ "3090 would be the best GPU you can buy. It's up to you to justify x2 the price of a 3080. For me, 3090 would be completely budgetless build as it's literal hundreds of extra dollars, and the biggest benefit would be performance assuming 3080 was enough.\n\nAnything past 5600X likely won't make any noticeable difference. Again, you can justify any CPU past that however you like, although it just makes sense you buy the best CPU if you buy a 3090, as you're already spending hundreds of dollars here for minimal gains.", "757" ], [ "Drive failure and longevity are negligible here as again, your intended uses aren't going to cause any issues that would compromise the drives. Realistically, any SSD under standard uses will last far longer than your other components. \n\nThe reliability again, only plays a role in situations that justify it. Like doing sustained workloads on a daily basis that really stress the drive, or having work related projects that cannot have interrupted workflow. Losing your game saves is probably not worth the extra money here, and this is also why backups like cloud storage or external storages exist.", "448" ], [ "Any single fan AIO is going to perform like a mid range air cooler at best. Heat dissipation is relative to surface area.\n\nNot only that, due to the M22 design with the pump in the radiator, it in fact performs worse than most single fan AIOs.\n\nIf you're at stock, the single fan AIO should be just fine and you shouldn't be reaching 100C temps. This is likely user error as to why this is happening. \n\nReset your CMOS first and foremost, make sure the CPU is running at stock. From there, make sure you have the AIO properly installed (with pump near bottom since air goes to top) and the block is properly mounted.", "81" ], [ "> around 65 and 75 respectively, which is way too hot\n\nThat's not way too hot.\n\n > And I'm pretty sure they would probably climb either if playing more.\n\nGaming isn't a sustained workload, so why would it probably climb?\n\n > So the solution I came up with is that I would like to buy an adapter instead to plug it in one of the other 2 PCIE slots below the GPU so it can breathe better.\n\nYour M.2 slot is running on chipset lanes. Getting a PCIe adapter would likely take CPU lanes. Yes, your GPU would likely run at 8x. No, this probably won't make any different to performance from both GPU or SSD.\n\nI don't think you actually have any issues here.", "121" ], [ "Your GPU running at 8x wouldn't make any difference, although when you get a 3080 it might, so this isn't ideal.\n\nSince you aren't even utilizing NVMe for the sequential speeds anyways, any SSD would provide similar boot/load times. I believe throttling to the point you notice generally happens over 80C. Just having it run 65-75C isn't going to make any difference, it could run at 1/5 the advertised sequential speed and still not change anything, which is shown when looking up Sata vs NVMe benchmarks for load times. If you're that concerned, then put a small heatsink on it. although only the controller needs to be cooled here.", "121" ], [ "I mean, people can justify their builds however they want. We're only here to aid in making educated decisions.\n\nHere are some reasons I can think of:\n\n- You have a 4k TV and want to occasionally game on it\n\n- 4k/60Hz requires around the same graphical power as 1440/144Hz\n\n- You have other uses that require higher end hardware\n\n- One of the games you play is RDR2\n\n- You have money and just want the best parts regardless", "375" ], [ "> I will be using the 2 TB SSD as my sole drive for windows and gaming, so with that taken into consideration, which 2 TB SSD is best for under $300?\n\nConsidering differences here are minimal given your workload for *any* SSD, then it doesn't make much difference.\n\nIf your definition of \"best\" is best value (price/performance), then the cheapest SSD would be best.\n\nIf your definition of \"best\" is best sequential speeds, then one of the PCIe4.0 NVMe drives would be best.\n\nGenerally, somewhere in the middle is where you want to be. MX500 or WD Blue are my recs for Sata. P1, 660p, or Sabrent Rocket are my recs for NVMe. Any of those would be fine.", "448" ], [ "\"Speed\" doesn't help load times much past standard SSD, you'd literally be paying twice as much money for fractions of a second off load times, at best. Say you cut down your IO time in half, going from 1 second to .5 second on a 16 second load is pointless. Load times are far more dependent on other components at that point.", "448" ], [ "From what you have now, not sure if your video editting can take advantage of NVMe. For gaming and streaming it's a complete waste.\n\nThat PSU is a bit much as well, no one uses 1000W PSU for a single card system, 750W would be fine even if you plan on overclocking heavily.\n\nFor memory, you likely want to aim for 3200-3600mhz memory, depending on pricing.\n\nDunno what you want in mobo so I'll skip that.\n\nDunno if you're overclocking so can't really comment on cooler either. It does come with a sufficient one though.", "592" ], [ "[PCPartPicker Part List](_URL_1_)\n\nType|Item|Price\n:----|:----|:----\n**CPU** | [AMD - Ryzen 9 3900X 3.8 GHz 12-Core Processor](_URL_2_) |-\n**Motherboard** | [Gigabyte - X570 GAMING X ATX AM4 Motherboard](_URL_3_) | $169.99 @ Amazon \n**Memory** | [Corsair - Vengeance LPX 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3200 Memory](_URL_5_/product/KntWGX/corsair-memory-cmk32gx4m2b3200c16r) | $149.99 @ Amazon \n**Storage** | [Samsung - 970 Evo 1 TB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive](_URL_5_/product/JLdxFT/samsung-970-evo-10tb-m2-2280-solid-state-drive-mz-v7e1t0baw) | $278.60 @ Amazon \n**Video Card** | [Sapphire - Radeon RX 5700 XT 8 GB Video Card](_URL_4_) | $399.99 \n**Case** | [be quiet! - Dark Base 900 ATX Full Tower Case](_URL_5_/product/G34NnQ/be-quiet-dark-base-900-black-atx-full-tower-case-bg011) | $199.90 @ Amazon \n**Power Supply** | [SeaSonic - FOCUS Gold 750 W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-modular ATX Power Supply](_URL_0_) | $95.00 @ Amazon \n | *Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts* |\n | **Total** | **$1293.47**\n | Generated by [PCPartPicker](_URL_5_) 2019-07-16 12:42 EDT-0400 |\n\nHopefully your productivity work requires the 32GB of RAM and 970Evo, it's a bit much otherwise.", "15" ], [ "> I am thinking I should get the ASUS 2080 Super, since I have an ASUS Motherboard.\n\nMakes zero difference besides maybe RGB\n\n > Is there anywhere to pre-order the 2080 super or do I just have to wait till the 23rd and hope I grab one off of Amazon?\n\nPre-ordering is stupid, wait for benchmarks\n\n > I am looking for a monitor in the $200 - $300 dollar range, 144hz, preferably 4k but not necessary.\n\nAdd another 0 if you want 4k/144hz. You should be looking at 1440/144 monitors, no point spending so much money on this build to skimp out on monitor.\n\nJust so you are aware, 9900k is low on value for gaming, considering the 8700k/9700k perform nearly identical for much cheaper. It gets even lower when you consider Ryzen. There is no point spending all that on CPU, when you don't even have an SSD in your build.", "989" ], [ "> Or is it just benchmark being an idiot\n\nMate... you're not interpreting the results correctly. UBM compares your results to everyone else running the exact same hardware, most of whom are overclocked. At stock, the 20-40% range is completely normal and expected.\n\nWhile yes, the way they present it is relatively idiotic, you also need to learn how to properly interpret your results. There is nothting out of the ordinary here.", "121" ], [ "Well obviously.... but the context here is pretty much assumed, as it always is when we are talking about high resolution gaming. The same way we say RX580 is a 1080p/60hz card, or when we say \"there's no overkill for 1440/144hz\", they're general statements based around modern AAA games running at given resolution/refresh. \n\nCurrently, the general consensus is that the 2080ti is the only card that can consistently run 4k/60hz, while the 1080ti/2080 are good enough, but will struggle.", "757" ], [ "> What I'm asking is possibly for some temperature charts on different case fans and how well they perform.\n\nThere are many benchmarks out there, the most relevant ones are ones that compare noise. Performance is rather irrelevant since 1) barely anyone runs fans at max, it's usually on a curve and 2) standard application doesn't require special fans.\n\n > I'm also asking what's your opinion on if it's really worth it getting such good fans to try get better FPS (overclocked, so better fans will be able to handle it better right?)\n\nNot really. More thermal overhead just means you can push more voltage. Whether or not that equates to higher frequency is up to the overclocker.\n\nWith Nvidia's GPUs, they run on turbo boost which will boost to a clock speed dependent on power and thermal overhead. However, the increased clock speed does nothing notable to real world performance.\n\n > if it's ok to just not need to go with crazy fans like Noctuas and instead stick with a mix of aesthetics and performance?\n\nYou are thinking far too hard about this. They're fans, all they do is move air. Standard fans in a standard case are sufficient enough to remove heat and introduce fresh air at an acceptable rate. If you are getting that specific that fan performance becomes an issue, you are pretty deep into overclocking and at that point you'll have a better understanding of this than most anyways.", "81" ], [ "> what exactly is a fan curve?\n\nFan curve is a profile that tells your fan how fast to spin, according to a component temperature (usually CPU).\n\n > if you were looking for performance and went with noctua, would you really notice even much of a difference, even in the high ends?\n\nDepends on the situation. It's almost always for noise, Noctua have the quietest fans around. The performance difference is mainly seen in high air flow situations, or high static pressure situations (like radiators or closed off front panels). There are so many variables in this though, that's it's near impossible to test all the fans and compare to eachother.\n\n > like would you get maybe up to something like 5 degrees better?\n\nI'd say 5 degrees, from my experience, would be a noticeable difference. If you look through my post history, I have used many fans in my build, and have never seen a 5 degree difference with just changing the fans. Noise and aesthetics are the most noticeable. \n\n > im super glad i re-thought this cos now im gonna grab myself some rgb fans\n\nIf you don't get RGB and don't want to pay for Noctua's, Bequiet is the best middle ground, their fans are incredibly quiet. I have yet to find RGB fans that compare noise wise to Noctua's or Bequiet's.", "81" ], [ "There isn't an exact way to build a PC, the order I do things could be very different from the next builder, and neither is wrong if the result is a working PC. \n\nWatch as many build videos as possible to give yourself the best idea of what needs to be done. Then follow the one you like most while you build yours. By familiarizing yourself with what needs to be done, you're minimizing mistakes and issues. \n\nAlso, mistake will happen. I've been building 15+ years and still make beginner mistakes. Lots of builders I know do as well. Just stay calm, and work through it. We're here 24/7 to answer questions if you aren't sure, ASK IF YOU ARE NOT SURE.\n\nLastly, I always recommend breadboarding before actually building. This can save you time and a headache if anything happens to be DOA.", "217" ], [ "Again, lower temps is pretty irrelevant at this point. The lower noise absolutely makes a difference IMO, but I've built so many PC's at this point that small things like fan noise is a big deal to me.\n\n[I have those LL fans](_URL_0_), I don't like recommending them as they are expensive as hell and aren't as quiet as I like. Nothing wrong with them though, just stupid expensive.", "81" ], [ "I sure hope you have a high refresh monitor if you need a top of the line CPU.\n\nEither way, benchmarks are widely available comparing the 2. Real world, you probably won't notice a difference between them, seeing as most games are GPU bound and both CPU's can handle any refresh rate.\n\nWe can't tell you how much your money is worth. If the difference in performance is worth the price to upgrade, then go for it.", "757" ], [ "You absolutely should pay for your OS, it's $100 for software that literally runs your PC. Honestly, it's a bit absurd that people are willing to pay upwards of $1200 for a GPU, but can't find $100 in their budget for OS. Windows is a product that people actively work on for their jobs, it's wrong to think it should be free and/or exploited. Your friend in the IT sector should be well aware of this, assuming he likes getting paid for his job.", "217" ], [ "idle temps mean nothing, on max temps are relevant. If 80C is the hottest you are seeing on your GPU, then you're fine. Turn up the fan curves if you don't feel comfortable with the temps.\n\n > I feel like my (small) room heats up way too quick with my PC on and my window (next to the computer) wide open!\n\nImproving efficiency of heat dissipation in your PC is only going to lead to heating up your room even faster.", "121" ], [ "> I'm seeing used stuff wayyy above msrp.\n\nWelcome to the last 6 months of inflated GPU pricing.\n\n > I've heard about the shortage on 30 series because of mining, scalping, etc, but... 10 series too?\n\nIf you can't buy 30 series, you start buying 20 series. Once those are out, you start buying 10 series. Etc....\n\nEnd is no where in sight. We have no idea when things will be normal. There are many factors, including a global silicon shortage, that are to blame. No we do not have a guestimate as to what will happen.", "816" ], [ "At this point, you buy what you can find at a price that is OK with you. How much something is worth is how much someone else is willing to pay, that's the current market. If you find something, you can look on ebay or any other marketplace to compare with what others are buying/selling them for. \n\nThe alternative if you need something soon is to be patient and diligent shopping in the retail market.", "618" ], [ "I'm not sure if you're aware, but it's worldwide and not just confined to the Philippines. \n\nGiven the state of the hardware market, primarily GPUs, there isn't much advice we can give. You're likely overpaying if your buying a GPU today, whether that's worth it is up to you to decide as we all value money differently. An item is worth the price someone is willing to pay.", "217" ], [ "Using an invoice that is not yours is fraud. No one here is going to do that for you.\n\nThe card is worth how much you paid. Just because the market sucks now and it costs much more doesn't mean your entitled to more. Trying to spin a profit off a lost package is not the correct way to go about this.\n\nYou have the Amazon invoice the for the entire PC, that's what you need to use if they're asking for an invoice.", "467" ], [ "> But things are cost exactly how much others are ready to pay for it\n\nTransactions have definitive times. The cost of an item is how much others are willing to pay for at that specific time.\n\n > If i bought 10 bitcoins years ago for 20 bucks that doesn't mean in cost same price now.\n\nSay you bought 10 bitcoin off a friend for $20 years ago. How would you feel if he called you today and demanded you compensate him for what it's worth now?\n\nAn invoice shows the correct price, as that's what it's worth at the specific time of purchase.", "618" ], [ "The pinout for 4pin fans is 12V, ground, tach, and PWM.\n\nWhen using PWM mode, the 12V is always 12V and speed is controlled via the 4th pin for PWM.\n\nIn DC mode, speed is regulated via voltage. So 12V would be full speed, 6V is half speed, etc....\n\nYes, you risk burning up the fans. You could run in DC and make sure it never goes above 40%, but I certainly don't recommend using them at all, just go buy some proper fans. Dunno where you even got 5V fans, but you can get standard case fans for relatively cheap.", "542" ], [ "There's not a whole lot you can do, and you've already listed everything that could possibly be suggested. Coil whine is annoying, but not detrimental in any way. It's caused by the coil physically vibrating, you can't really stop that. Given every game utilizes your GPU differently, it's common that whine is more noticeable in some games than others. The most success tends to be from undervolting or capping GPU usage.\n\nMost of my GPUs have audible whine. I wear headphones when I game so it's not anything that ever bothers me, and I'm also pretty used to it at this point. Granted, I'm old AF and my PCs growing up made far more noises from HDDs to floppy discs to 56k modem...", "121" ], [ "> so I went looking for a 5m DP cable to run from my PC to Acer Z34 monitor. Took me ages to find one that does the job and even now if I knock the desk (usually from jumping out of the chair quickly) I'll still get momentary flicker.\n\nJust so you know, the ideal length for DP is around 2m and just from personal experience, issues tend to be far more common when using 4m or longer cables.", "989" ], [ "> 2 as intake for the radiator on the top inside the case)\n\nWhy not exhaust?\n\nIf you have 5 fans as intake and 1 fan as exhaust, you're fans aren't running very efficiently. You can't create/destroy air, at equilibrium air in = air out, so it's not ideal having 1 fan trying to keep up with the other 5 fans. \n\n > They way I am thinking of it as the 2 fans i have on the radiator are the exhaust fans so I don’t really need another one on the rear i’m guessing.\n\nOn paper, this is certainly far more ideal. Given we all have different setups, testing different fan configurations yourself is the only way to know for sure.", "81" ], [ "> I want to play in 1080p 144hz and I really want to avoid a bottleneck\n\nInstead of worrying about bottlenecking, you should instead research what a bottleneck actually is. You can't avoid bottlenecks, if you could then we would all have infinite performance.\n\nThis should also allow you to understand why your 2600 is probably still just fine. I have a 2600 and it handles every game I play at 144Hz just fine.\n\n > I saw the 10600kf which seems to be a very decent cpu but I am not sure if its worth it.\n\nThis would also require you to upgrade your motherboard. \n\nWe upgrade when we feel the CPU is lacking and verify the CPU is the issue. Otherwise, you're just throwing money and making no noticeable difference in performance. If your CPU is running just fine now, then there is no reason to believe it won't continue to do so.", "757" ], [ "> Unless he's using a DDC pump, the D5 pump shouldn't produce anything more than a low pitched hum at best which ends up being mostly inaudible in a good case.\n\nYes, but D5's can still make noise, I've had a couple that hum and vibrate. It's not as loud as a fan, but still audible. And definitely still louder than nothing at all\n\n > Secondly, unless he's push/pulling (for some unknown reason, as the benefits are negligible at best for most scenarios) his fan count would be roughly the same as it would without watercooling, the one caveat to that is of course cases with basements which as a first timer he probably won't have.\n\nRoughly the same being the key word here. Just saying watercooling is quieter isn't true, it's the fans that cause the most noise, and you can run fans at low RPMs just as easy on air as water. I'll give you the point that GPU fans can be loud as hell, so eliminating those fans can make a big difference in noise.\n\n > So to follow up on this and the fan count, liquid is a far better conductor of heat which means there should be almost no situation where he would have to run his fans faster on liquid with adequate radiator space than he would strictly on air to reach the same temperatures.\n\nUmmmm.... no? Water is a terrible conductor of heat. Copper is a good conductor of heat, which is why it's used as the cold plate. Conductivity of an object is it's ability to transfer heat, aka if it heats up fast, it's generally a good conductor. Water has a higher specific heat, which is why it's thought of as superior to air for cooling as it can carry more heat away from the source. This is why water takes longer to cool down to room temperature than air (obviously).\n\nYou should really keep your toxicity levels in check\n\nEdit: For the record, I didn't downvote your toxic yet ironic post", "81" ], [ "Correct me if I'm wrong, those are the CPU and DRAM lights (it'll say in tiny print next to the light). \n\nCouple things to check and try here:\n\n- Is the CPU power plugged in. It's a 8 pin to located above and left of your CPU.\n\n- Is your CPU seated correctly. Had a friend recently do this, everything seemed right, but his CPU ended up not being seated properly. \n\n- Try using only 1 stick of RAM, and try all the slots.\n\nIf none of those work, let me know", "653" ], [ "8700K is not a great CPU for SFF builds unless you manage to win the silicon lottery. General rule of thumb is 120mm rad per component and an extra 120mm if you OC, this is for *custom* loops on CPU's don't don't run as hot. For AIO you would probably want minimum of 360mm to OC any decent amount on that CPU. You might as well save some money and go 8700", "592" ], [ "Feel free to check my history, I posted my latest hard line build. I've talked my friend through it over the phone as well. Really not too difficult to do, just takes patience (and lots of money lol). I did a quick write up for a few redditors if you want it, maybe it'll help. I would offer my services but it's hard for me to design a loop without having the actual parts assembled in front of me. Either way, if I can be of service, let me know. I'm in Cleveland BTW, so not too far", "742" ], [ "Not really, I've been building custom loops for almost 15 years now. Using barbs and soft tubing is almost dummy proof. Even easier if you get a res/pump combo. That's like saying subtraction is harder than addition, yea that's true but it's not a whole lot harder. Hell, I still think mounting the CPU block is probably the hardest part.", "742" ], [ "It could work, I wouldn't worry about undervolting though. I pretty much lost the silicon lottery (4.9 @ 1.39V, no offset) and still can manage 1.2V ish at stock which isn't hard to keep under control. My comment was mainly for overclocking. 4.7 on all cores may be doable with that AIO, you may even be able to get 4.8, but if you happen to get a chip like mine you'll be pretty much stuck at stock.\n\nRegardless of OC, if you get a 8700K I would recommend a delid, it goes quite a long way. OC'ing when the CPU starts showing it's age won't do a whole lot, generally OC'ing doesn't take a CPU far enough to make it relevant again as there are many other factors that are much more important (lithography, cores, threads, etc...). That's why when people say I might OC down the line, I generally answer you might as well just do it now. It won't decrease the usable life span so why not.", "121" ], [ "8700K is stock clocked at 4.7 btw...\n\ncore1: 4.7, core2: 4.6, core3: 4.5, core4 & 5: 4.4, core6: 4.3\n\nPeople like to use IBT, P95, cinebench, 3dmark, aida64, unigine benchmarks. I use these when I'm initially testing voltages\n\nI personally use every day tasks to test stability, like rendering videos in premiere, constantly loading and closing games, and other stuff I can do to push my CPU.", "121" ], [ "Yes that is turbo clock, which is stock btw as it is on by default. But what I said before, it's only 4.7 on *one* core, the other cores have different turbo clocks.\n\nNo one can tell you what you may or may not be able to overclock, it's up to the exact chip you recieve (aka the silicon lottery). You will most likely be able to run 4.7 on all cores, probably even 4.8 on all cores. But again, it's not a guarantee. We also can't tell you voltages and what will be stable, that you will have to test for yourself.", "121" ], [ "The key word there is marginal, OC'ing will never take a CPU from low-mid range to high range, it'll just make it slightly higher. 10% increase is pretty good in today's terms. Keep in mind, with gaming that 10% is even less since most games are GPU dependent. You *will* get a FPS increase though, just nothing worth noting lol. Either way, OC'ing now vs OC'ing later isn't going to make a difference. Delidding will void your warranty, but it's kinda a crap warranty to begin with. If you have SL delid for you, they warranty their work, which turns out is better as they will replace if anything ever happens to your CPU.", "404" ], [ "Nothing wrong with prebuilts btw, they *may* be more expensive, but keep in mind they come with Windows installed and a warranty, which goes a long way if you're new and something goes wrong. \n\nNo one can tell you how fast stuff goes out of date, no one can tell the future. Also, people's definitions of what is acceptable differs. Most gamer's could acceptably play on 4-5 year old pc's running 1080p 60fps, whereas people that have played on 1440p 144hz may struggle to find that acceptable. With that said, that PC is pretty outdated already, it's not even a 1080p machine.", "217" ], [ "Don't build around last gen CPU, it costs just about the same but performs worse. Not good value.\n\nFor a non-K CPU, mobo makes less difference. You still don't want to get the cheapest of the bunch though as the VRMs are probably crap, but you also don't need the most expensive. It's tough as reviews probably won't help much either, so I would just say stick to brands you trust (ASUS, ASrock, Gigabyte, MSI are all good).\n\nCoolers does make a difference, but with a non-K version, again you don't need anything spectacular. Generally, the stock one that comes with non-K chips is sufficient. If you want to upgrade, 212 EVO is a small step up and great value.", "592" ], [ "Forget about solidworks for now, any PC build in the last decade can run solidworks. For high end gaming, Intel remains on top. The 8700K right now is the best CPU for gaming, followed by the 8700 and 8600K. I would recommend researching those cpus. On the Ryzen side, the new 2700X seems to be a very good gaming CPU as well and offers more cores/threads. That would be the only chip I would research on the Ryzen side if you are looking for high end. \n\nJust so you know, the K at the end means that the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, meaning you can overclock. If you don't plan on overclocking, just get the version without the K as it will be cheaper and have a cooler included.", "153" ], [ "I was kidding, just more poking fun at the endless posts that ask if their system has a bottleneck or if blah blah will bottleneck blah blah. Someone should script a bot that answers the SLI and bottleneck questions with generic answers.\n\nEdit: not making fun of you OP, it's the companies that advertise useless technologies and use irrelevant terms that I'm irritated with.", "370" ], [ "It's personal preference, I'm nowhere near good enough to comment on this as I'm probably subpar in PUBG, but I do play a lot with some pretty decent players.\n\nI have been playing FPS games for a long time, and my personal preference is smaller screens since that's what I'm used to, if I'm trying to play serious (Tribes and CS1.6 on a 17\" CRT, Modern Warfare and battlefield on 22\" LED). I recently upgraded all my monitors to 27\" or bigger because, well, I'm getting destroyed by 12 year olds nowadays so might as well look good doing it. Bigger screens are more immersive, but I do feel smaller screens give people a competitive advantage. You can see the entire screen easier, which makes identifying HUD items easier. You also get better pixel density. I can understand why people say recoil would be easier as well, as physical the pictures are moving less distance due to smaller picture size.", "989" ], [ "M50x with modmic without a doubt. Open backs like the K7xx will net you an even wider sound stage which is great for direction and distance.\n\nIf you need scientific proof, let me show you the light. You have 2 ears, so why get more than 2 drivers? Well, your ears tell direction and distance by time delay, wavelength, and frequency. So you might ask, well why do 5.1 speaker systems work. That's because the noise is not isolated per ear, so time delay, wavelength, and frequency come naturally. With headphones, delay needs to be simulated since what your left ear hears, your right ear will not. Every game simulates this. It doesn't matter how many drivers they put in each ear, or their location, that's just not how your ears and brain work. Also, many of these \"gaming\" headsets use virtualization to simulate direction, which is just software. This again is unnecessary as you are literally just compressing the audio twice. Why pay for extra software and extra drivers, when you can spend half the price and get better quality and sound. \n\nSo good headphones (M50x are fantastic) and modmic are the way to go. If you want to improve quality, get a good DAC/amp.", "329" ], [ "Basically what those 3 said.\n\nI have 2x r9 290s in xfire, I can tell you when I use that PC for gaming I only run a single card, the other card is just a $300 space filler. At most I see a 30% increase in FPS and the added microstutter is about the most irritating thing ever. Oh, and it generally takes about an hour of testing to get Xfire to run the way I want it to", "757" ], [ "> Buying an AIO will greatly reduce the heat that my cpu produces\n\nNo it won't, that's not how it works. Your CPU produces the same heat regardless of what's sitting on top of it. Better cooling just means you are removing more heat. \n\nAny low-mid range air cooler would be more than enough. Watercooling here would be paying extra for aesthetics, which is fine as long as you know what you are paying for.", "81" ], [ "Hello, and thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed. Please note the following from our [subreddit rules](_URL_0_):\n\n**Rule 4 : No laptop or prebuilt PC questions**\n\n > /r/buildapc is primarily a desktop PC building and troubleshooting forum. \n\n > For laptop questions or suggestions, try /r/suggestalaptop, /r/gaminglaptops or /r/laptops instead.\n\n**Rule 11: No selling, trading or requests for valuation**\n\n > If you want to buy, sell or trade hardware you should do so on /r/hardwareswap. Price evaluations should be requested through [/r/hardwareswap's Discord server](_URL_1_). \n\n > Discussions of privately buying, selling or trading software are not permitted.\n\n\n\nThank you.\n\n---\n\n[^(Click here to message the moderators if you have any questions or concerns)](_URL_2_)", "804" ], [ "I get it, you were talking about temperature, he was talking about heat/energy prodcued. The misinterpretation is the distinction between heat and temperature.\n\n > My 960 2gb produced more heat than the 2070 super i have rn\n\nThis is a prime example. Your 960 might have run hotter, but it certainly did not produce nearly as much heat as your 2070S, we're talking about nearly double the amount of heat from 2070S. Only it's expelling twice that amount as well so the temperature you see each run at does not mean your 960 is producing more heat, it's cooler is just not as good at dissipating it.", "722" ], [ "Your car has a rev limiter so you can't just floor it and blow up the motor. Your CPU has a clock multiplier so it doesn't do the same. Overclocking is essentially setting that limit a little higher, at the cost of additional power/heat as well as potential stability and/or longevity.\n\nThe most basic form of overclocking is finding voltage required for stability at specifics clock speeds.\n\nExplaining how to do it could take anywhere from a couple hours to a couple years depending on how in depth you want to go. Head over to /r/overclocking and read through their wiki/tutorials.", "121" ], [ "I mean, that probably would happen. I didn't go into logistics of how this would work, just the underlying factors.\n\nIt most certainly would not work in a standard water loop as you eluded to, given the pump certainly would stop functioning at some point and the tubes would freeze and shatter. Not only that, liquid helium would be changing phase, making this more like a HVAC unit which would likely cause issues with internal pressure as liquid turns into gas.", "722" ], [ "> What do I need to know in order to use all slots?\n\nWhich slots are you referring to?\n\nYour motherboard manual is the go to reference for these types of questions. \n\n > I would like to have a gpu, some sort of raid card, and a USB hub as well as a m.2. Is that even feasible?\n\nYou have 16+4 CPU lanes on Ryzen. That's 16 to the PCIe slots (some may go through chipset, again refer to motherboard manual), and +4 to drives (generally top M.2 slot). \n\nIf you need more CPU lanes, then you should be buying HEDT and not mainstream. Otherwise, your components like USB hub will likely run through chipset lanes. \n\nAny reason you need/want a RAID card?", "968" ], [ "Unless you plan on creating an array with HDD's, RAID is rather pointless and any SSD will already provide minimal load/boot times.\n\nIf you want more storage, buy bigger drives. If you fill up all the M.2 slots, then just use Sata. If you really hoard that much data, then buy a hotswap drive bay or buy a NAS.", "448" ], [ "We build desktop PCs here. Desktop components use standard form factors making building rather modular.\n\nLaptops have soldered components and are designed to fit in a specific chassis, which the OEM also designs. \n\nWe can't answer this, you're basically asking a car sub how to modify your boat. We don't know. This would be completely DIY and would require you to do the proper research, mods, and fitment as needed.", "127" ], [ "> but I read that some discourage those manufacturers.\n\nDunno who is discouraging EK and Corsair, they're like the 2 biggest water cooling companies out there along with Bitspower. \n\nAny manufacturer is just fine, I mean it's just machined parts. Proper research needs to be done on your end, things like mixing metals are issues that need to be avoided. I would avoid the really cheap stuff (or brandless components), which doesn't make any sense to buy anyways as custom looping has extremely little actual value.", "144" ], [ "> I actually don't understand why some AMD owners are so aggressive towards Intel owners.\n\nWe don't either.\n\n > Also why is there a hype over AMD Ryzen, like now their prices are higher than Intel, and still people buy AMD.\n\nWe assess each build on a build to build basis. If it makes more sense to recommend one over the other, then we will. We don't control what people buy or prefer.\n\n > Also once I asked for a PC here, and git no Intel based rig, just AMD.\n\nDid you specify your brand preference?\n\nAlso, we don't provide builds here. That's r/buildapcforme, see rule #2.\n\n > I'm not hating AMD, Ryzen owners in any way, I just want to know what's with the hype, etc.\n\nI would suggest asking this in a sub with a brand bias, like r/AMD", "85" ], [ "> I read some comments that EK and Corsair are too expensive for the proposed stuff\n\nI mean, again it's just machined parts. They are rather expensive, but seeing as a custom loop costs hundreds of dollars and provides little to no practical benefit, saving money seems a bit counter-productive. \n\nBrands like Barrow, Bykski, etc... are just fine as well.", "885" ], [ "Hello, and thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed. Please note the following from our [subreddit rules](_URL_0_):\n\n**Rule 8 : No submission titles that are all-caps, clickbait, PSAs, or pro-tips**\n\n > This includes titles containing emoji, asking to be upvoted or not upvoted, PSAs, LPTs, \"pro tips\", \"reminders\" and all other common tactics attempting to draw extra attention to the title.\n\n**Rule 9 : No submissions that are low-effort, memes, jokes, meta, or hypothetical / dream builds.**\n\n > /r/buildapc is a community dedicated to helping those who need assistance in building or troubleshooting their PCs. To keep discussion on topic, hypothetical or dream builds, joke, low-effort, memes, and meta posts are not permitted.\n\n**Rule 10 : No self-promotion, begging, advertising or surveys**\n\n > This includes self-serving/affiliate links, advertisements of your own services/content/fundraising, or begging of any form.\n\n\n\nThank you.\n\n---\n\n[^(Click here to message the moderators if you have any questions or concerns)](_URL_1_)", "156" ], [ "What temps are you reaching?\n\nYou need a way to mount it. Depending on the PCB, some \"hybrid\" kits may fit. Otherwise, something like the G12 with an Asetek cooler would what you want to look at.\n\nI'm not sure why you would want to do this though, it's going to cost > $100 which this card really isn't worth all that much anymore. That money could go towards a better GPU.", "592" ], [ "We don't talk people into buying things, that's not what we do. What we do is help you make an educated decision, as this is ultimately your PC and you should buy what you want.\n\nI have no idea what your workload entails, but if you can make use of the additional cores/threads, then 9900k could very well be worth the upgrade. If not, then there probably isn't much point to doing so. I would try looking up benchmarks for the particular games, programs, or apps you use.", "592" ], [ "Why did you change all those numbers? Did you just pull those numbers from someone else?\n\nThe very basic principle of overclocking is finding voltage required for stability at certain clock speeds, which is going to vary from CPU to CPU depending on the silicon lottery. I would suggest reading through the guide on /r/overclocking prior to changing any more numbers. Clear CMOS to revert to stock.", "121" ], [ "3200 is advertised speed, it's what the manufacture tested the RAM at themselves and was stable.\n\nThat RAM can run at whatever speeds to want, however it can be assumed that going over the advertised number would be rather difficult.\n\nIf your motherboard has a max of 2666, then you can set it to 2666 and it will run as such. If you buy a new motherboard that can support 3200, then you can set it to 3200.", "121" ], [ "2 is generally enough, 1 in and 1 out. This can often be relatively loud.\n\n4-6 fans is ideal and should provide plenty of airflow while still running the fans at relatively lower speeds.\n\n6+ is a luxury for the vast majority of builds.\n\nYMMV, we all live in different environments, run our PCs differently, do different things on them, use different components, etc....", "81" ], [ "Yes, that is exactly what I am saying. Not sure if you weren't aware...\n\nAdding fans means you get the same airflow while being able to run the fans at lower RPMs. 2 fans running at 800RPM is much quieter than 1 fan running at 2200RPM. \n\nThere is obviously a point of diminishing returns, as at some point adding more fans is pointless and increased airflow has minimal benefits. \n\nThe same concept can be used to size a cooler, by increasing surface area for heat dissipation, you can get equal amount of \"cooling\" while running the cooler fans at lower speeds.", "81" ], [ "Are you overclocking? If so, neither of these coolers should be considered.\n\nIf not, then thermal overhead doesn't really matter so long as your CPU is running at safe temps. The 212 should be just fine.\n\nWhile I never advise getting single fan AIOs as they perform no better than low to mid range air coolers, the M22 stands out as especially bad by performing worse than other 120mm AIOs while also costing much more.", "81" ], [ "Hello, and thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed. Please note the following from our [subreddit rules](_URL_3_):\n\n**Rule 2 : No build spoonfeeding requests**\n\n > If you would prefer to :\n\n > * Learn how to put one together yourself, please visit [our wiki](_URL_1_) & take some time look through recent build [help](_URL_5_), [ready](_URL_6_) & [complete](_URL_7_) posts.\n > * Have a list provided for you, please visit [our Discord server](_URL_4_) or /r/buildapcforme\n\n**Rule 12 : No excessive posting (more than one submission in 24 hours).**\n\n > If you are unhappy with the attention your post received, or are looking for advice on a range of topics, you can :\n\n > * Comment in the daily [Simple Questions Thread](_URL_2_)\n > * Wait 24 hours & make a post again\n > * Visit our [Discord server](_URL_8_).\n\n\n\nThank you.\n\n---\n\n[^(Click here to message the moderators if you have any questions or concerns)](_URL_0_)", "804" ], [ "> Is there any reason I should keep my OS separate from my other files?\n\nIf you have a workload that benefits from NVMe, then sure it can help to leave one empty to be used as a scratch disk. Otherwise, just buying one for boot is personal preference. You can accomplish this by partitioning your drive if the plan is to reformat/reinstall OS often.\n\n > thought about getting a cheap $40 nvme that only has a 200 MB/s read speed.\n\nWhy not just get a Sata SSD? They make M.2 sata drives as well.\n\n > Is there any reason I should keep my OS separate from my other files? \n\nYou haven't told us what you're doing with them other booting. Chances are it won't benefit you by any noticeable amount.", "448" ], [ "Those are sequential speeds and pretty meaningless if the context is talking about boot and load times.\n\n > I just want to have apps and my computer boot very fast, and I’ve heard that putting a bunch of other stuff on your boot drive will cause the speeds to lower.\n\nAny SSD including Sata will provide minimal load and boot times. Also, any SSD will slow down when reaching max capacity.", "448" ], [ "I mean, watercooling doesn't perform any better than air cooling unless we get into the territory of insufficient surface area from top end air coolers. The vast majority running water cooling are doing so for the aesthetics.\n\nWhich makes wanting a \"hybrid\" cooler pretty pointless, as you're paying extra and not actually benefiting from the reasons why people choose water or air. \n\n3700X overclocked can be cooled just fine via top end air coolers. You go watercooling here for aesthetics.", "81" ], [ "Watercooling functions no different than air cooling, and is often times louder since you are literally using the same 120mm/140mm fans blowing through a heatsink to dissipation heat, only now you're adding in pump noise as well.\n\nQuiet comes from oversizing a cooler, as you can achieve the same amount of heat dissipation running fans at lower speeds using more surface area.\n\nWithout having any relevant information here, like what CPU you are trying to cool, it's quite impossible to give proper advice.", "81" ], [ "> A bigger radiator means better heat disappation, which means less need to run the fans at high speeds for the same performance as air.\n\nYou can say the same thing about air. A bigger air cooler means less need to run fans at high speeds for the same performance as water.\n\nYou want the biggest cooler, whether air or water. Heat dissipation of convection is Q=hA(T1-T2). Surface area is key, so if you want to make the comparison of water vs air, make it a fair one with equal surface area.", "722" ], [ "> Can I just use an internal ssd inside a gaming pc ?\n\nYes. Any reason you think otherwise?\n\n > Do I need to buy thermal paste if I doing water cooling\n\nYes. Thermal paste is to maximize heat transfer between the cold plate and the IHS/die. Watercooling is irrelevant here.\n\n > Is the 2060 worth buying now?\n\n\"Worth it\" generally falls on price and performance. You haven't provided price, and 2060 isn't going to cost the same around the world. The second half of \"worth it\" is your personal opinion, as you can literally justify whatever purchase you want for whatever reason, it's your build.", "81" ], [ "You're on the right track.\n\nHeat dissipation is relative to surface area. You can verify this by looking up the formula for heat dissipation via convection.\n\nWater vs air makes little to no difference, an air cooler with roughly the same area as a radiator will perform roughly the same as well. This is why in your example, top end air coolers generally perform between a 240 and 280mm radiator.\n\nWhere custom looping has the advantage is the ability to add more surface area, should that be needed (aka you're saturating the existing cooler). If you have a really power hungry system, you can decrease noise by adding in far more radiator than needed, thus maintaining heat dissipation at lower fan speeds (there is a point of diminishing returns).\n\nA custom loop with 240mm of radiator will perform roughly the same as an AIO with 240mm of radiator. Otherwise, custom loops do also use better equipment, like D5/DDC pumps, although AIO tend to have sufficient flow anyways so not much difference in terms of performance.", "722" ], [ "Refer to your motherboard manual, read the sections for expansion slots and storage.\n\nExpansion slots:\n\n > Intel® 10th Gen Processors\n\n > 2 x PCIe 3.0 x16 (x16 or dual x8) *1\n\n > Intel® Z490 Chipset\n\n > 1 x PCIe 3.0 x16 (max at x4 mode)\n\n > 3 x PCIe 3.0 x1 *2\n\nStorage:\n\n > Total supports 2 x M.2 slots and 6 x SATA 6Gb/s ports\n\n > Intel® Z490 Chipset :\n\n > 1 x M.2_1 socket 3, with M key, type 2242/2260/2280/22110 storage devices support (SATA & PCIE 3.0 x 4 mode)*3\n\n > 1 x M.2_2 socket 3, with M key, type 2242/2260/2280/22110 storage devices support (PCIE 3.0 x 4 mode)*4\n\n > 6 x SATA 6Gb/s port(s)\n\nYour M.2 connectors run through the chipset, this doesn't effect your CPU lanes going to your GPU.", "968" ], [ "> PCIE GEN 4\n\nWhy do you need PCIe4.0? What is your use case?\n\n > 2 PCIE 16x slots(preferably running at 16x speeds\n\nThere isn't a single X570/B550 board that supports x16 bandwidth to both multiple slots. This doesn't exist on mainstream, as every Ryzen CPU only has 16+4 lanes. Regardless, you probably won't saturate PCIe3.0x8 to begin with, much less PCIe4.0x8\n\n > Good VRMs\n\nFor what CPU? Overclocking?", "153" ], [ "Your GPU runs directly to the CPU via CPU lanes. Your CPU has 16 lanes, with 16 going to your GPU. The rest going through the chipset, so there is no way it could share lanes unless you connected your drive to a PCIe slot using CPU lanes via a PCIe adapter. You have CPU lanes, and you have chipset lanes, with DMI3.0 connecting them.\n\nAll your drives on Z490 run chipset side, and have zero to do with your GPU which runs CPU side.", "545" ], [ "> I've heard that it should be possible to have the motherboard split the PCIE 4.0 16x to two slots running at 8x speed\n\nThis is called lane bifurcation. If you want x8/x8 split, look for any board that supports SLI as SLI requires x8/x8 split. If it says Xfire only, then it's likely x8/x4. This sort of information can be found on any motherboard spec page or manual.\n\nI dunno where you live (availability) or what your budget is. You can use _URL_0_ to filter motherboard selection via your requirements to narrow it down. Any mid range to high end board would be perfectly fine for your uses.", "592" ], [ "None of this makes any sense for gaming or mining.\n\nWhy would you pick a 165W TDP processor for mining? Do you plan on mining with the CPU? Makes even less sense for gaming.\n\nIf so, why would you pair it with a low end 212 with 150W TDP?\n\nWhy do you have conductonaut in your list? That's liquid metal that almost exclusively used for delidding. If you're at this point of using LM, then a $40 air cooler doesn't make any sense.\n\n64GB of memory?\n\n$144 NVMe drive for gaming?\n\nThe sound card will take up a PCIe slot, which is pretty valuable if this is intended as half a mining rig.\n\nI mean, $3500 PC? With a 3060, you're looking to mine about $4-5 a day running all day long. That means it would take about 2 years to make your money back, assuming the market stays exactly how it is for 2 years.", "592" ], [ "> i like responsive browser so i got 64gb.\n\nDo you plan on having literal thousands of tabs open? 32GB is overkill, 64GB is just wasting money. Dunno what your productivity requirements are, but I see nothing here though would require > 32GB of memory.\n\n > i wanted to try it out with the air cooler before messing with liquid cooling.\n\nLiquid cooling is no different than air, you're just dissipating heat through a radiator/heatsink. In fact, AIO's aren't any more difficult than any other air cooler. I would certainly drop conductonaut though, zero reason to use LM here. \n\n > alot of games and things i want on the m2 ssd\n\nMake sure you research the distinction between NVMe and Sata. M.2 is just the form factor. You don't benefit much at all running games on NVMe compared to any other SSD, much less one of the most expensive ones.", "448" ], [ "> and i dont want to deal with any loading times. i want < 10 second restarts and all the good shit\n\nNone of this has to do with RAM amount, and NVMe only barely helps, seeing as any SSD will have minimal access times. Sequential speeds make little to no difference here. Boot times rely on the initialization process of the exact motherboard.", "448" ], [ "Hello, and thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed. Please note the following from our [subreddit rules](_URL_0_):\n\n**Rule 7 : No submissions about retailer or customer service experiences**\n\n > Submit customer service experience posts to /r/PCRetailers. This includes talk about RMAs, retailers, sales people and all other things retail.\n\n**Rule 8 : No submission titles that are all-caps, clickbait, PSAs, or pro-tips**\n\n > This includes titles containing emoji, asking to be upvoted or not upvoted, PSAs, LPTs, \"pro tips\", \"reminders\" and all other common tactics attempting to draw extra attention to the title.\n\n\n\nThank you.\n\n---\n\n[^(Click here to message the moderators if you have any questions or concerns)](_URL_1_)", "477" ], [ "There are a whole lot of drives between a HDD and a 970evo... I would certainly suggest a cheaper SSD if all you're doing is gaming.\n\nYou should do a little research on NVMe vs Sata for starters, and you may want to look into M.2 slots and which one of the 2 is supported (or both).\n\nSSD will not boost your FPS for the vast majority of games. What you will notice is much faster load times in many games, as well as your overall system feeling \"snapier\" assuming you have never used a SSD before.\n\nSSD is definitely worth it. The one you picked is probably not. I recommend MX500 or WD Blue Sata SSDs for you, they are available in both M.2 and 2.5\" versions. If you want NVMe, then get a cheaper one around the same price like the P1 or Sabrent Rocket.", "448" ], [ "> Google has suggested a million different fixes and I have no idea which one to try.\n\nThis is because your issue could be from a million different reasons.\n\nBasic troubleshooting is eliminating possible points of failure to pinpoint exactly what is wrong. Simplify the build by trying to run it with the least amount of components possible. This is called breadboarding. \n\nCheck the easy things first. Is your TV plugged into the GPU? It won't work plugging into the mobo. Is your TV on the correct input? Are all your power cables installed correctly? Are there any debug lights on? etc...", "653" ], [ "It's not broken, when you run a game at a non-native resolution in full screen, obviously the displayed resolution on the monitor will change. So if you exit, it's likely just retaining the settings you put in the game.\n\nFreesync only work when your framerate is below the refresh rate, since it syncs the refresh to your output framerate and you can't go higher than it can go. \n\nIt's rather pointless to run Freesync if you are over the refresh rate, and the point of running a lower resolution is to increase framerate. Dunno how you have it set up, but the best ways would be either cap the framerate below refresh (so like 141FPS) to force adaptive sync, or run with no sync and max FPS. Trying to mix both isn't really going to be ideal.", "404" ], [ "I think at that level it's way more about what they are comfortable with, even if it's subliminal. I doubt many pros actually understand the hardware side, as you can probably tell from the 1080Ti's running CSGO at sub 1080p resolutions lol. I would guess that since they are trying to make a career out of it, any amount counts even parts that will do next to nothing for them.", "404" ], [ "> Is a dual-setup as easy as using one HDMI cable and one Display Port-HDMI cable?\n\nPretty much yes. If you have extra HDMI cables, a DP to HDMI adapter would work as well.\n\n > And how much impact will this have on the GPU, assuming I'm only going to use the second screen for additional windows and not to expand the FoV in any games I play?\n\nSmallest non-zero number", "756" ], [ "Yea, so advertised response times are pure marketing, they literally don't mean much to the consumer at all. Most people think it's input latency, which is probably why manufacturers keep advertising it. It's not, it's actually the time it takes for a pixel to change from one color to the next, and deals with motion blur and ghosting. There isn't a standard way of testing this, so companies will test/tweak to make that number as low as possible to advertise, but that doesn't mean the number is realistic or will even be minimal for ghosting. Just ignore it, and read multiple reviews on each monitor to formulate you own opinion.", "989" ], [ "My point was that I'm no doctor, and neither is anyone responding here. We are in no position to be offering advice on proper posture. You need advice on a GPU? we got you. Wanna know if your chair will cause scoliosis? The only way I know to answer is just to blink rapidly and stare at a wall. \n\nMaybe look up what makes a good ergonomic chair and what to look for to promote good posture. I have no idea personally.", "893" ], [ "Ok, well assuming this is a gaming build...\n\n- 9900k is a waste of money, if you look up benchmarks you'll realize the 8700k/9700k perform nearly identical for less money. Then if you look at Ryzen, you'll see it gets even worse for value.\n\n- Dropping down also means you don't need a $180 AIO when a $80 air cooler will perform just as well for less than half the money.\n\n- 32GB is pointless for a gaming build, you'll barely ever need 16GB but I don't know your workload so maybe theres a small chance you could actually use it. \n\n- NVMe is pointless for gaming, much less one of the most expensive ones. Unless you are utilizing sustained sequential read/writes on a daily basis you're just throwing money for a drive that isn't being used for what it was designed for. \n\n- Dunno if you need WD Black drives, not sure what kind of benefits you think you'll get from them. \n\n- Paying $1400 for a 2080Ti is pretty bad. A 2080Ti will perform like any other 2080Ti, so why pay $300 extra. \n\n- Platinum is just efficiency and does not mean it's higher quality than a gold rated PSU. It's generally pretty pointless to get plat, as it would take about a decade of your PC being on under load 24/7 to make back the money from energy savings.\n\n- Do you actually use the features in W10 pro or did you just pick pro because you think it's better somehow?\n\n- You probably don't need 3000RPM Noctua Industrial fans unless you plan on running them at 100% all the time for some reason.", "592" ], [ "Ok, well I do some testing on Xfire and SLI, and my response to you would be Xfire/SLI is dead so I'm not sure how else you want me to respond. It literally sucks butt and I have it disabled 99% of the time, pretty much only use it for Tomb Raider and benchmarks. \n\nIt's only going to get worse, which is clearly indicated when AMD left it off the 5700/5700XT and literally no one cared or even noticed.", "784" ], [ "I saw a 50-70% increase in framerate which is probably the best I've tested with minimal stutter, but that still sucks because I was [literally pulling 800W+](_URL_0_) do to so.\n\nBFV I had a terrible time with. It scaled decently well (as did APEX) but the stutter made it impossible to play online/competitive seriously.\n\nBTW, benchmarks do show real world experience, that's literally why their there. If they omit experience with microstutter, that's likely because it's to be expected anytime you run multi GPU.", "404" ], [ "What you want defies the laws of thermodynamics. Heat/energy cannot be created or destroyed.\n\nYour PC is going to produce the same amount of heat, since it has a specific power requirement to run. The temperature at which is runs is a function of heat introduced, heat dissipated, and ambient temperature. \n\nIf you improve cooling, all that means is you are expelling more heat into your room, aka your room gets hotter. You're still producing the same amount of heat, and now you're just dissipating it faster.\n\n82C is completely safe, you could run your components at 82C 24/7 for the next 10 years and it shouldn't have issues. If you want to lower temps, then turn up your fan speeds.", "722" ], [ "It's just people repeating what they hear. Bottlenecks got a bad connotation somewhere down the line and now people just throw it out there like it's an actual issue. Doesn't help when manufacturer's use it as a scare tactic to get people to upgrade more often, it literally drives all the regulars here bonkers how often we get \"bottleneck\" questions. u/psimwork even coined the term \"bottleneck boogieman\" because of how unrealistic this fear is with beginners.", "370" ], [ "Having dealt with MSI GPU warranty first hand, it's likely more trouble than it's worth. Unlike EVGA, MSI will stand by their \"of equal performance\" for replacements. OP sent in a 1060 3GB, they sent one back, it's a fair deal in their books. \n\nIf OP was to send it back, it would likely result in at least a few more weeks of waiting, on top of (what I assume) the few weeks he's already waited.", "757" ], [ "I believe their mobo cs is different than GPU. They use a 3rd party company in Vegas to RMA GPU's. Basically they get what you send in and quickly try to replicated the issue. If the problem you described exists, they scrap the card and send you back a refurb. If they can't replicate, then send back exactly what you sent in. This all takes 3-4 weeks as well.", "545" ], [ "NVMe is faster than sata, M.2 is just the way the SSD connects. Both NVMe and sata are SSD's. \n\nIt's probably not worth it, since performance is dependent on use case. For gaming and general purpose, you won't notice the increased speeds of NVMe since you aren't utilizing it.\n\nIt's not actually a \"problem\", your M.2 slots share bandwidth with your sata ports. Otherwise, they would be taking CPU lanes away from your GPU.", "448" ], [ "Unless you're loading a new area/cell, texture loading is done via VRAM. Yes, it can make a difference, but it's on so few games that' it's still pointless, access times are far more important and sata SSD is already minimal. And I would argue that \"noticeable\" part, if load times are that long that a NVMe will change load times more than a few seconds, you probably aren't sitting there counting anyways. \n\nMate, benchmarks comparing NVMe to sata are widely available, everyone's mom and dog has benchmarks comparing the two, and the overall consensus is it's completley pointless for gaming and differences in load times are nowhere near what we saw going from mechanical to solid state. Some have mad the exception for heavily modded games, but that's really it.\n\nAnd before you go on about \"but the P1 and 660p cost the same as Sata\", i literally don't care, you're getting a lesser SSD IMO.", "448" ], [ "This is all a bit confusing, M.2 is just the connection interface, like USB. M.2 SSD can refer to either NVMe or sata.\n\n > I tried to tell him the difference in Windows boot time/OS operating speed, etc between SATA and NVME SSDs but he still says it doesn't matter and I feel like he's wasting a lot of potential here.\n\nWhat difference? The big difference between sata and NVMe is sequential read/write speeds. For boot times and access times, sata SSD is already incredibly fast, hence why it felt so \"snappy\" going from mechanical to solid state. Improving access times further isn't going to do much. In this case, I would agree with your friend, I'd rather have a large SSD that handles everything fast, then get a NVMe for a unnoticeable improvement and a stupidly slow mechanical drive that's only good for file storage and media.", "448" ], [ "> Most people do not OC their memory and in 80% of cases there is no real world benefit to doing so anyway.\n\nAnyone using XMP is OC'ing their memory, by that logic we should only recommend 2133-2666MHz\n\n > Other than the fact we don't know what board OP is using and how many channels it supports for memory, the system will not slow down sticks on a separate channel. That's the entire point of multichannel mem slots.\n\n[_URL_0_](_URL_0_)\n\nThe slowest DIMM module populated in the system decides memory channel speed.\n\nThe entire point of multichannel is to increase bandwidth available between CPU and RAM\n\n > Having extra memory available when needed, even if it's just for opening more browser tabs, is always a good thing\n\nI'll agree it's a good thing, but yea... there is no real world benefit to doing so anyways. If you're getting by with 8GB to begin with, how much difference is it going to make going 24GB over 16GB?\n\nI mean, you're right, we don't know what OP has, which is exactly the point of my comment, more memory doesn't always mean better. It's entirely realistic OP could be using 5GB of memory right now on average, running 2400MHz memory. If he/she bought 2x8GB of 3200MHz memory, you're probably better off leaving that last stick out.", "121" ], [ "I'm confused here, you have a custom loop but also an AIO, h80i is an AIO? What do you mean the pump isn't working, what kind of pump? D5 or DDC? How many reservoirs do you have?\n\nIf your pump isn't working, then your temps will steadily climb until your CPU thermal throttles, it won't just sit around 74C forever, temps will continue to climb as little to no heat is being dissipated.", "81" ], [ "IMO I would just invest in a new monitor, DVI is outdated and no longer used, hence why your 2060 doesn't even have one.\n\nDP to DVI would likely work, but chances are you will need an active adapter to get 144hz, which costs around $100+. At this point, you might as well just buy a whole new monitor, as there are many high refresh options at the < $200 range.", "989" ], [ "Yikes, call the OEM and have them deal with it. I doubt they used AIO hardware to run a custom loop, that makes very little sense and is pretty wrong if they did.\n\nNot sure how you can tell if water is moving through the tubing, it's clear. For reference, I build custom loops and it's nearly impossible to tell if water is moving if the loop has no air bubbles, hence why we use flow indicators. \n\n > What temps are usually thermal throttling at?\n\nWell you never told me your CPU so I have no idea, but most CPU's will throttle around 100C.", "81" ], [ "Yes, the GPU supports NVLink, but that' doesn't mean the game supports it or if it'll even work. SLI/NVLink is a dead technology and a complete waste of money. So much so the new AMD cards don't even support it, it just went away and no one said a word because it sucks, just a matter of time for it to be completely gone. \n\n > What kind of PSU would I need to support this setup (with NVLink) while running two 27\" LCD monitors?\n\n850W+, most ran a 1000W+\n\n > How would the noise of the coolers/fans be? The original build was designed to be quiet even on high workloads, I'd like to keep it that way if possible.\n\nWell, that depends on your fan curves, but since SLI can dramatically increase heat and your doubling GPU fans, it sure won't be quieter.", "81" ], [ "> From what I understand, almost all GPUs below the 20XX series is too weak if you want to play smoothly on recent titles.\n\nAt 4k? Maybe. At 1080p? I think every decent card dating back to 2013 would disagree. This also depends on what you mean by \"smoothly\" as felt smoothness is personal opinion.\n\n > So my question is, if I get the 3070 (which is $500), would it be fully utilized in a $1k build? Should I get a 20XX series instead? And if so which one?\n\nWe don't have any of the proper information here to assess this.\n\nWhat resolution? What refresh? $1k for just the PC? How much are 20 series in used market? What games do you play?", "757" ], [ "Your list is private\n\nAt 1080p, there are lots of relevant cards. For AAA games, \"smooth\" is often 30+ FPS, although most will likely prefer 60+ FPS. \n\nBuying 20 series or older is just fine, assuming you find them at a good price. The used market will give you a good indication of good pricing on older gens.", "404" ], [ "I've had zero issues with the riser cable. IMO, they're all kinda crap to begin with. You're just adding another point of possible failure anyways. \n\nThe biggest issue is VRM cooling as there is no actual airflow. People have taped fans, used USB fans, etc... to rectify this. Generally, not an issue for standard use at stock settings, or if you are using an air cooler, but it should be noted as many using this likely won't be running either.\n\nThis is a good test bench, that can be turned into a mediocre case.", "1006" ], [ "No, any Z370 will run a 9900k at stock (maybe super low end ones may struggle). If you are overclocking, any higher end Z370 should still be just fine. \n\n > and I've heard that vrm might get hot but I don't really have any idea what it is. or how to cool it.\n\nVRM = voltage regulator module. It converts power that is usable by the CPU. They generally have heatsinks (you see them around the CPU socket) to cool them down, and would be just fine with any standard airflow in your case.", "81" ], [ "Z370-A is midrange. Should be fine for a 9900k without overclocking.\n\nYou update the BIOS before installing the 9900k, your PC won't post if the BIOS doesn't have updated microcode to support newer CPUs. \n\nI can't guarantee nothing will overheat, this isn't like universal. We all have different ambients, different cases, different fans, different level of cleanliness, etc.... It shouldn't overheat though.", "592" ], [ "Without active cooling, heatspreaders can be over-saturated relatively quickly, it's just prolonging assuming heat is consistently introduced. This is an actual concern on open testbenches, as even high end boards can easily overheat running trivial loads. X570 is the only chipset in the last decade or so with active cooling.\n\nEither way, this isn't relevant to the context of this post. OP is (probably) asking about VRM quality and this thread was taking his incorrect terminology literally.", "121" ], [ "Any SSD will be just fine here, again NVMe vs Sata SSD makes very little difference if your workload is gaming.\n\nIf you have the budget for a 2TB SSD, then sure that would be great.\n\nIf you say, have half that budget, then going with a 1TB SSD with a 1TB HDD would likely be the best option, and you would use the HDD for general storage, as well as games where load times aren't effected or don't matter.\n\nDon't overspend on expensive NVMe drives here is my only advice. There are plenty of reliable Sata drives, or cheaper NVMe drives that cost around the same (~$200-220 USD for 2TB).", "448" ], [ "RAID0 with NVMe is beyond pointless. Especially on Z490 when both drives on are chipset anyways, and you'd be limited to half the bandwidth given DMI is only x4. You're doubling risk of failure for fun at this point, and in fact losing performance in areas like boot times due to initialization of RAID arrays.\n\nHaving 2x NVMe drives would be useful if you're working with large files, mainly transferring from one drive to the next. \n\nFor general use/gaming, makes no difference at all. NVMe is already negligibly better than any Sata SSD for these uses as the sequential speeds don't mean much.", "448" ], [ "That's a good point and I'm interested in your opinion on this as well.\n\nI mean, I don't think there's a single benchmark that's the go to for all answers, should be mixed results to formulate personal opinion. I've seen the /r/NewMaxx resource and that seems to be pretty solid. Puget systems has some good articles as well. \n\nI'll admit, i generally disregard endurance ratings. I haven't found any confirming tests, and my own experience is it makes no difference as I have yet to have any of my SSDs fail (HDDs are a different story).\n\nIt's your discretion on what we are telling people. The way I see it, if I'm wrong, then that'll just lead to good discussion and everyone involved learns something new.", "448" ], [ "I would certainly agree with you, at least a \"buy it for many PCs\" component lol. My 840EVO is doing great, although the 250GB capacity went obsolete faster than the drive did. \n\nReally would be curious about endurance with PCIe4.0 drives, you'd think just purely based on increased bandwidth, it should decrease endurance. If we could have a definitive result on this, might shed a bit more light on expectations for a normal user from testing the edge case scenario.", "448" ], [ "Yes, you need to change boot priority in BIOS.\n\nIt should be noted that cloning isn't guaranteed to work, and you also would need to extend the partition or you'd be stuck with 120GB of usable space still and the rest unallocated.\n\nOr, just leave OS on the current SSD because realistically your boot times likely aren't going to change much going to NVMe, or any other load times for that matter. And assuming you have workloads that utilize the increased speeds of NVMe, leaving it as empty as possible for a scratch disk would be ideal. If not, just use it as another install directory.", "159" ], [ "NVMe is a drive interface that uses PCIe bus. These drives can be multiple times faster in sequential read and write speeds compared to standard Sata SSDs. They also offer such benefits as lower latency and increased IO. _URL_0_\n\nThe catch though, is that none of that makes much difference if you're just using it for gaming, or general use. It's generally fractions of a second faster for load times, and usually won't make a noticeable difference if you've already been running a Sata SSD. Now say you work with large files on a daily basis (like 4k video editting or large work projects), then having all that extra speed could make a huge difference.", "448" ], [ "You can look up benchmarks comparing NVMe to Sata or even HDD if you want to see differences. There are likely some that will compare the games you play. \n\n > And what if I what videos or movies in 4k.\n\nI mean, you can watch a 4k movie off of a HDD and it will load almost right away. Going NVMe would be a waste of fast drive space for this purpose. \n\nAny SSD should vastly outlive your PC. I have a SSD that's been through 4 machines at this point and still going strong.", "448" ], [ "> Whatcha mean by \"how low in value a 10900k is\"?\n\nAssuming this is for gaming, you can look up benchmarks comparing 10900k to other CPUs. It's marginally better than 10700k/9900k/9700k/8700k at this point while costing significantly more. You paid extra money to say you had the best gaming CPU, which there isn't anything wrong with that, but that does make it very low value (price/performance). This isn't even accounting for AMD's offerings. \n\n > So even if I'm just using integrated for nothing intensive, with that older, stock cooler, it would probably end up toast? It was good enough for the i5 when they released it though, but this chip just runs much too hot for that?\n\nNot even close. 4690k is maybe 100-120W at full tilt, 10900k will run 200W+ easily. It should be noted, the cooler you have has a TDP of roughly 140W, assuming it's the one I'm thinking of.\n\n > I'd rather spend the $50 on a better radiator or other fancy add-ons for the loop, etc..\n\nI mean, custom loop is literal hundreds of dollars extra that you're paying for aesthetics. A 360mm AIO would be just fine even with overclocking a 10900k. $50 more into the loop wouldn't benefit you at all, whereas $50 for a cooler means you can use your CPU now, and the air cooler also retains it's resale value. Custom loop components do not.", "81" ], [ "There are no Intel CPU's that currently support PCIe4.0 so BIOS update isn't going to change that. You would need next gen CPUs to even utilize it.\n\nSo unless you plan on buying 10th gen now, and 11th gen when it releases, this isn't an issue and PCIe4.0 likely won't make a difference for your GPU for this or next gen.\n\nI doubt Intel will support this chipet past next gen.", "545" ], [ "> EKWB is much more up my alley with kits starting from $260 - $300\n\nYou best make sure you're not looking at the aluminum line. That block is nickel plated copper, and should not be used with aluminum products. \n\nJust so you are aware, custom looping isn't going to provide any practical benefits. You're paying hundreds of dollars for pure aesthetics. We custom loop as a hobby above all else.", "885" ], [ "Well, I can't see 5 years into the future so there is no way I can advise. At this current time, which I do have information on, there is no real benefit to PCIe4.0\n\nIncreasing drive speed isn't going to deliver more gaming performance. Drive speeds deals with load times, and NVMe already provides very little benefit over Sata SSD as the increased sequential speeds don't really matter.\n\nFor video editting, it might make a difference, but you'd have to be editting only a daily basis to say PCIe3.0 isnt' enough for your workload, IMO.", "448" ], [ "I think RDR2 would disagree, sub 100 FPS is just fine for most people, and generally more framerates aren't going to improve user experience for AAA titles, especially compared to increased visual fidelity.\n\n > 60 fps died with Pascals release. Sub 100 gaming is for plebs.\n\nThat sentiment aligns more with PCMR. We are not PCMR. People can literally enjoy whatever they want, however they want. No one is playing games for them. \n\nFact is, high refresh gaming is still the minority: _URL_0_", "404" ], [ "> Also, it is important that the SSD does not slow down significantly when filled\n\nLiterally every SSD does this, you shouldn't fill any SSD up all the way. Get one with DRAM if that's a big concern, every SSD I recommended has DRAM.\n\nBoth of those drives are needlessly expensive given your workload. Again, you aren't even benefitting from NVMe, much less one of the most expensive ones.", "448" ], [ "Crucial makes the MX500 and P1, they are pretty big in the drive world.\n\nWestern Digital makes the Blue drive, arguably the biggest name in the drive world.\n\nIntel makes the 660p.\n\nSabrent is the only brand there that is lesser known.\n\nIt sounds like you want me to justify your Samsung drive, in which you do not need my approval to buy it. I'm only here to provide information, what you buy for your build is 100% up to you.", "448" ], [ "Max performance is rather irrelevant if you aren't running them at max speed.\n\nAlso, AIO rads aren't very thick or restrictive, so fan choice here likely won't make any thermal difference worth noting. Especially given the 240mm is more cooler than you need for a 3600, even overclocked.\n\nYour biggest difference would be noise here. Outside of that, you can test these for yourself to see if there is a significant difference.", "81" ], [ "a) I'm not following. The 16 lanes are physical. If you add in multiple components, they split those 16 lanes, you can't just add 16 more lanes to accommodate another GPU. If you need more CPU lanes, then generally running HEDT is the solution.\n\nb) Depends on the GPU. If we're talking all PCIe4.0 then x8 won't make any difference. If we're dropping down to PCIe3.0, then x8 still likely won't make a difference, but possible slight loss in performance when using the highest end cards.\n\nc) Build another PC for guests using leftover or older parts.", "757" ], [ "Are you looking for a custom loop? If so, I'd put an emphasis on **custom** loop. \n\nYour best bet in that case would be to buy a kit, even then I doubt it will be under your current budget. Considering custom looping is like 90% prep work and research, no one can help you plan for a loop for free. \n\nWatercooling isn't providing you with much practical benefit here, it's hundreds of dollars for aesthetics above all else. Watercooling the GPU won't do anything as Nvidia cards are power limited, so any performance increase will strictly be on paper.", "757" ], [ "Are we talking modern CPUs? If so, they're all DDR4.\n\nFrom there, you take a look at the exact CPU, as well as your budget. Do you need 8GB? 16GB? 32+GB?\n\nIs your platform dual channel? Quad channel? If dual channel, then buying 2 stick would be better. For quad channel, 4 sticks.\n\nAre you on a Intel B board? If so, 2666/2933 would be best, as you can't go over anyways. If you're no a Z board, then 3200 would be just fine, up to 3600 if you can afford it or have memory intensive tasks.\n\nAre you running AMD? If so, memory frequency plays a bigger role as IF is memory speed dependent, running 1:1 up to 3733 (Ryzen gen 1, 2, and 3) or 3800 for Ryzen 5000.", "592" ], [ "I don't think your student will enjoy playing epsorts games like rocket league if via network VM. Any amount of input latency tends to be exaggerated in these games. I mean, even going PC with a monitor to PS4 with a TV is like night and day as far as latency goes IMO. \n\nAre there any other options? Any computer labs?", "155" ], [ "> I do have OCD so I notice like 6 frame differences lol\n\nDo you? So if I turned off your FPS counter and had one game at 60 and one game at 66, you could tell me which is which? I'd venture it's subliminal at best.\n\nAnd for reference, taht would be a 10% difference. Difference in clock speed if we're talking one power level lower is like 1-2 FPS difference. \n\n > I just want to know if this is the computer not boosting as high because it’s high temp\n\nAgain, 6 FPS difference would be generous here if that was the case. Maybe if you were getting like 180FPS to begin with, then year maybe 6 FPS more. Lowering temps will increase clock speeds, how much is dependent on the exact card, settings, firmware, silicon lottery, etc...\n\nAs someone that's been watercooling GPUs since 2003, modern Nvidia cards dont' benefit any noticeable amount by lowering temps. Zero chance it dropping 10C is going to change your actual performance worth mentioning.", "404" ], [ "I mean, it completely depends on the game you are playing. There are many games where this just isn't possible with any current hardware. RDR2 is a prime example. Generally speaking, \"ultra\" presets have a lot of settings that will significantly lower framerate while not adding much in terms of visual fidelity.\n\nAs we can't see the future, we can't tell you how well a 6800 or 3080 would be able to run games that have not been released yet.", "757" ], [ "No, the cable type should not change how smooth anything is. As this is a digital signal, differences between connects like HMDI or DP won't make a difference, assuming you can reach intended resolution/refresh.\n\nHaving higher bandwidth doesn't make any difference if you don't need the extra bandwidth. If you need to move 1 liter of water, it's not going to matter if your bucket is capable of holding 3 liters or 5 liters.", "938" ], [ "A distro plate isn't going to effect performance at all, unless it changes the flow of the loop itself.\n\nGiven your temp is relative to heat introduced and heat dissipated, only the rads would do anything to change temps here. As you didn't tell us what size rads, or even what components you are cooling, it's quite impossible to advise. Most likely, adding extra rads isn't going to benefit you much at all, as benefits are only noticeable if one rad wasn't enough to begin with.", "81" ], [ "> not directly marked as gaming cards?\n\nYou mentioned the only one, 3090. In preivous generations, we had Titan cards. \n\n\"Worth it\" is the prospect of value, which is performance per price. If you have no budget, anything can be \"worth it\" as you can justify your purchase however you want. For most people with any sort of budget, 3090 is probably not in consideration for gaming purposes as it falls very low in value.\n\nIMO, it only makes sense to upgrade by going 3080 or better, as the 2080Ti/3070 are just one notch above 1080Ti. Or if you really want RT/DLSS.", "757" ], [ "Hello, and thank you for your comment. Unfortunately, it has been removed. Please note the following from our [subreddit rules](_URL_1_):\n\n > No piracy or grey-market software keys\n\nNo piracy or so-called \"grey-market\" software keys. This is includes suggesting, hinting, or in any way implying to someone that piracy or the use of these licenses is an option. If a key is abnormally cheap (think $10-30), it is probably one of these, and is forbidden on /r/buildapc.\n\n\n\nThank you.\n\n---\n\n[^(Click here to message the moderators if you have any questions or concerns)](_URL_0_)", "793" ], [ "Hello, and thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed. Please note the following from our [subreddit rules](_URL_2_):\n\n > No laptop or prebuilt PC questions\n\n/r/buildapc is primarily a desktop PC building and troubleshooting forum. For laptop questions or suggestions, try /r/suggestalaptop, /r/gaminglaptops or /r/laptops instead.\n\n > No excessive posting (more than one submission in 24 hours). \n > To prevent spam and allow everyone to receive they help they want, only one post per 24 hours is permitted.\n\nIf you are unhappy with the attention your post got, or are looking for advice on a range of topics, you can :\n\n* Comment in the daily [Simple Questions Thread](_URL_1_)\n* Wait 24 hours & make a post again\n* Visit our [Discord server](_URL_3_).\n\n\n\nThank you.\n\n---\n\n[^(Click here to message the moderators if you have any questions or concerns)](_URL_0_)", "804" ], [ "M.2 is a form factor. They make M.2 Sata drives, which are the same as 2.5\" sata drives, only they connect via M.2. The distinction here is Sata vs NVMe.\n\nThe only use case you list here is booting OS's, which the increased *sequential* speeds of NVMe aren't really going to benefit you much, if any. Sata vs NVMe makes very little difference here. Now say you edit large 4k videos, or work with large project files, then sure the sequential speeds of NVMe would likely benefit you a lot.", "448" ], [ "Consoles and PCs do not compare directly.\n\nHardware is not comparable as there is no consistent performance metric in which to compare them (aka benchmarks). Consoles are usually configured to dynamically scale settings to reach a target framerate. PCs have the ability to completely configure the settings.\n\nNot just that, but consoles also have software that is optimized for the hardware, since the hardware selection is set and developers do not need to accommodate thousands of different hardware combinations.", "404" ], [ "Why mainstream? Why not Intel-X? Is there no GPU rendering here? \n\n32GB of 4000MTs RAM? Is your workload ram speed dependent? Are your project sizes relatively small? \n\nThis seems like a specific purpose built PC that benefits from single core speeds? Also, the GPU is pretty low end, if you just need video out the CPU has a iGPU. Why were you chosen to spec this out? Why was a 3rd party not hired and held responsible?", "757" ], [ "A lot of this still doesn't make sense, and your hardware choices seem to contradict each other.\n\nIf you're not working with large files, then why the NVMe drives? Why RAID0? Also, you specc'd PCIe4.0 drives here for a PCIe3.0 platform? My assumption would be at least RAID1 for the redundancy, as RAID0 is double the risk. You're also increasing risk by running high speed memory, it's typical to spec 2666MTs or lower memory in a productivity setting for max stability. It's a bit odd you need that much sequential speed, yet don't need more than 32GB of memory?\n\nI'm not trying to be rude or anything, but I would suggest telling your company to hire a 3rd party for this build. There isn't any reason to put your name and your career at the company on the line doing a job that isn't in your job description. It would alleviate the burden of responsibility from you, and your company would be getting exactly what they are paying for, including tech support from the OEM.", "448" ], [ "> Why would speedier memory be less stable if it's run at it's spec speed? \n\nYou mean advertised speed. The faster you try to make your RAM go, the more difficult it is on the IMC and it becomes less stable it becomes. Like with literally anything else, pushing components to the extremes results in less reliability. \n\n > Do you have a recommendation for a PCIe4.0 motherboard?\n\nIntel does not have any CPU's capable of PCIe4.0, so no given your requirement is Intel only.\n\nAgain, you're doing yourself and your company a disservice here.", "121" ], [ "> I'm looking at buying a new headset as I'm trying to get into doing some streaming and was wondering what headsets are the best in terms pure audio quality as I'll be using an external microphone.\n\nYou are going to get better quality from regular headphones. Directions can generally be improved with a wider soundstage (so open back headphones may be more appealing to you).\n\nSennheiser HD 559 would be my rec for open back, AT-M40X would be my rec for closed back. I would say the $150-200 range is the sweet spot for quality audio, you may want to check out /r/audiophile for more recs.", "329" ], [ "> Any precaution I should take with mounting CPU coolers / applying thermal paste directly on the die?\n\nYes, many.\n\nThe IHS acts as a protective shell for the die, so overtightening here could result in cracking the die.\n\nNot only that, coolers are all designed to be mounted to a specific amount of pressure. If you take the IHS off, then that design goes out the window.\n\nWhen we do this on mainstream, you generally will use a direct die bracket (_URL_0_) or design your own to compensate for lack of IHS.", "304" ], [ "The proper terms and distinction is between volatile and non-volatile memory.\n\nVolatile memory (aka RAM) only retains data while powered, so as soon as there is no power, all the data stored on it is gone. Non-volatile memory retains all data regardless of power. \n\nVolatile memory tends to be faster, with data more easily transferred compared to non-volatile memory.\n\nCache on storage is basically memory for your drive where commonly used data is stored on the cache for faster access.", "448" ], [ "Hello, and thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed. Please note the following from our [subreddit rules](_URL_6_):\n\nWe don't cater to requests for prebuilt recommendations, or questions asking whether X prebuilt at Y price is good value; If you would prefer to :\n\n* Learn how to select a parts list yourself, please visit [our wiki](_URL_1_) & take some time look through recent build [help](_URL_4_), [ready](_URL_3_) & [complete](_URL_5_) posts.\n* Have a prebuilt suggested for you, please visit [Discord server](_URL_0_) or /r/suggestapc\n\n\n\nThank you.\n\n---\n\n[^(Click here to message the moderators if you have any questions or concerns)](_URL_2_)", "804" ], [ "Extra storage? PCIe4.0 doesn't increase capacity.\n\nI would suggest looking up load time benchmarks, as NVMe vs Sata already makes little to no difference (and that's a direct side by side comparison). Sequential speeds don't mean much for loading games. Taking it one step further with PCIe4.0 isn't going to change anything worth noting, it's just less value if the intent is load times.", "448" ], [ "> I seen people use the box the motherboard comes as a test bench. Is this safe?\n\nThis is typically to test for DOA as a quick setup, not meant for extended use. I mean, you can, but it's far from ideal. \n\nThe old case would be best, as I see no point spending a decent amount of money on a test bench for 2 weeks of use.", "493" ], [ "Generally in a gaming scenario, your CPU tells your GPU what to render, and your GPU does the rendering.\n\nIf your CPU is near 100% utilization, you can't increase framerate by magically increasing GPU usage, as at that point your performance is limited by CPU, not GPU.\n\nIf your GPU isn't fully utilized, then something else is limiting the end performance, whether it's another component or a setting in your software that's limiting it.", "404" ], [ "If the game natively supports SLI, then sure that would work.\n\nBut most games do not, which means you need to create your own profile to force SLI. This more often than not results in microstutter or an unplayable mess with less than 30% scaling (sometimes even negative), which renders it pointless to even enable.\n\nThe issue at this point is developers don't care about SLI anymore as single cards are plenty powerful, and hardware follows suit with AMD and Nvidia abandoning it completely (except the 3090 which isn't really a gaming GPU anyways). That means new games where you would benefit most from multi GPU aren't even going to work with SLI (DX12 opts for mGPU anyways, which *requires* developer support).\n\nSo basically you'd be spending $200 for a hotter and more power hungry PC. For reference, I've been running and testing SLI and Xfire for about a decade now.", "757" ], [ "> I know that 1 TB isn't enough with games nowadays being huge.\n\nDepends on the person. For most, 1TB is plenty for OS and their commonly played games. \n\n > I won't put the operating system on the M.2 because I don't want to waste potential on a device\n\nI would advise looking up benchmarks comparing Sata to NVMe if this is a concern of yours. Or PCIe4.0 vs 3.0 for load times, because realistically it's not making a noticeable difference in either scenario.\n\n > What do you guys think is the best, cost-effective solution?\n\nSata SSD or cheap NVMe like Crucial P1 or Intel 660p.", "448" ], [ "> Probably not at the moment, but I am building this rig to last a while without updates, for personal reasons.\n\nYou are betting real money that optimization for *future games* will utilize direct data streaming, which it probably will not. As we already know about load times in current games, this isn't something I would suggest doing. Sequential speeds don't matter, certainly not doubling that with PCIe4.0. Using the new PS5 as a reason for PC parts is useless and they don't compare. Developers have the distinct advantage of coding for one set of hardware for ocnsoles. If they want to make money on PC, it would be silly for them to optimize for the smallest and most niche percentage of gaming users.", "933" ], [ "A good miner will undervolt to save energy.\n\nThe analogy to make here would be, would you rather have a car with 100k miles but the driver only drove the speed limit, or would you rather have a car with 20k miles but the driver took it to the track every weekend.\n\nBasically, it should come down to the previous owner and whether or not they knew what they were doing. Mining vs gaming shouldn't make much difference, at best the mining card might need to have the fans changed, if it was run for a very long time.", "543" ], [ "Hello, and thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed. Please note the following from our [subreddit rules](_URL_2_):\n\n**Rule 12 : No excessive posting (more than one submission in 24 hours).**\n\n > If you are unhappy with the attention your post received, or are looking for advice on a range of topics, you can :\n\n > * Comment in the daily [Simple Questions Thread](_URL_1_)\n > * Wait 24 hours & make a post again\n > * Visit our [Discord server](_URL_3_).\n\n\n\nThank you.\n\n---\n\n[^(Click here to message the moderators if you have any questions or concerns)](_URL_0_)", "156" ], [ "Hello, and thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed. Please note the following from our [subreddit rules](_URL_1_):\n\n**Rule 8 : No submission titles that are all-caps, clickbait, PSAs, or pro-tips**\n\n > This includes titles containing emoji, asking to be upvoted or not upvoted, PSAs, LPTs, \"pro tips\", \"reminders\" and all other common tactics attempting to draw extra attention to the title.\n\n**Rule 10 : No self-promotion, begging, advertising or surveys**\n\n > This includes self-serving/affiliate links, advertisements of your own services/content/fundraising, or begging of any form.\n\n\n\nThank you.\n\n---\n\n[^(Click here to message the moderators if you have any questions or concerns)](_URL_0_)", "156" ], [ "> I have bought a PC recently and I am just now being told that it has a terrible CPU (AMD FX-4300 Processor.)\n\nYes, that processor is terrible\n\n > After being told my CPU was bad I was suggested to upgrade it to the AMD FX-9590\n\nDon't listen to that person. That processor shouldn't have ever come out and isn't good for anyone\n\n > and that the AMD FX 8350 is the best option.\n\nIt's the best option available without upgrading anything else. Still not a very good CPU though.", "153" ], [ "All PC fans are 12V, and so are you headers. Splitters work by wiring the fans in a parallel circuit. If you do not know anything about circuitry, voltage drop in a parallel circuit is the same across all components. They do this because fan speed is determined from voltage so all fans need same voltage. By controlling speed via voltage, each fan will spin at the *percentage* of what speed you set. Here's an example:\n\nFan 1: 1800RPM \n\nFan 2: 2200RPM\n\nIf both are on the same header, and you set voltage to 50%, fan 1 will spin at 900 and fan 2 at 1100. Fan control is based on percentages to simply things for the user. Likewise, if you were to set voltage instead, 6V should net the same results.", "542" ], [ "Who said that? I sure didn't.... Sure I wanted a bigger screen but there's absolutely a limit and 27\" is about as big as I want my monitor.\n\nThere's a reason why competitive gamers prefer 24-27\" monitors, and really only graphic designers are using larger displays. 27\" is pretty ideal, maybe going up to 32\" would be alright as well, but anything bigger than that is too much IMO. I think the industry introducing ultrawides was their remedy for getting more screen real estate without giving up pixel density or convenience.", "989" ], [ "So what your saying is you want a VR headset...\n\nPeripheral vision has no place in this conversion as you can't use your peripheral vision for anything productive, and, it's again why ultrawides came out (not to mention the 49\" super ultrawide that Samsung just announced). Just because you can doesn't mean you should, and your focus sure isn't 135°. The only reasoning would be immersion, and again if that's what your going for just get a VR headset. For most, getting higher pixel density is more important, as we can fit more into what we can actually focus on.", "539" ], [ "It's not that it's too much, it's just we try to recommend value and performance over \"buy what's most expensive\"\n\nI won't comment too much, but that processor is purely for production and not gaming. It's like buying the most expensive SUV so you can take it racing. Sure you can, but why? If you want to do both, the 2700X would be your best bet.\n\nAlso, SLI is a dead technology. It seems to help in 4k gaming more than anything else, but it's no longer supported or developed for and the industry is past the point of \"we're going away from this\". It's just not a viable or practical solution unless you really hate money. You'd be much better of waiting for next gen GPUs and run a single 1080Ti for now. \n\nI get that you don't like compromising on graphics, but the tech isn't there yet. I mean, I don't like compromising on the way I travel but flying cars and jet packs just don't exist.", "757" ], [ "> My reasons were that I could imagine to start video editing --- > gonna need more cores for that; second reason for why I didn't look around in the cheaper AMD section was that I wanted to keep an Intel/Asus build\n\nIt depends on the program you are using. Also, more cores isn't always better. Fast single core speeds can sometimes beat out more cores/threads. Not to mention, AMD's Threadripper will net you more cores for half the money if that's the direction you want to go.\n\n > My thought behind that was AMD just might not be the most efficient thing when combined with an NVIDIA gpu/ASUS motherbord but that's more guessing than knowing.\n\nThis isn't a thing\n\n > well I've read an article stating that future games might be able to utilize 12 cores\n\n100% speculation. We have no idea if they will or not. You can guess, since some games now are able to take advantage of more cores/threads, but for it to be a standard would be purely a guess, and absolutely you won't see it implemented in the lifetime of any new PC. On top of that, game performance at the current time is GPU limited (general statement, there are obviously exceptions), more CPU power isn't going to net much performance gain.\n\n > plus I just think that 2 gpus will be able to beat absolutely anything available in the todays and even future market\n\nYou don't just plop it in and it works. They require a driver profile for them to sync with eachother, which are specific to the game/application. It's unsupported because many many games do not have these profiles that allow 2 GPUs to work together. Now you can force it, but it's a pain to get them to do anything production. You get terrible scaling (30% increase in framerate is considered good, while you are using twice the power) and microstutter (feels jittery, laggy, and unstable). \n\n > I don't believe in a single gpu being able to handle as much as the dual's do\n\nYou can actually get negative results from running 2 GPUs", "153" ], [ "[PCPartPicker part list](_URL_0_) / [Price breakdown by merchant](_URL_0_/by_merchant/)\n\nType|Item|Price\n:----|:----|:----\n**CPU** | [Intel - Core i5-8400 2.8GHz 6-Core Processor](_URL_5_) | $178.89 @ OutletPC \n**Motherboard** | [MSI - H310-A PRO ATX LGA1151 Motherboard](_URL_10_) | $69.99 @ B & H \n**Memory** | [G.Skill - Aegis 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 Memory](_URL_1_) | $154.99 @ Newegg \n**Storage** | [Samsung - 850 EVO-Series 250GB 2.5\" Solid State Drive](_URL_2_) | $99.99 @ Samsung \n**Video Card** | [MSI - GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB GT OCV1 Video Card](_URL_8_) | $299.99 @ B & H \n**Case** | [Corsair - 200R ATX Mid Tower Case](_URL_6_) | $39.99 @ Newegg \n**Power Supply** | [SeaSonic - FOCUS Gold 550W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply](_URL_3_) | $59.99 @ SuperBiiz \n**Optical Drive** | [Lite-On - iHAS124-14 DVD/CD Writer](_URL_4_) | $13.79 @ SuperBiiz \n | *Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts* |\n | Total (before mail-in rebates) | $967.62\n | Mail-in rebates | -$50.00\n | **Total** | **$917.62**\n | Generated by [PCPartPicker](_URL_7_) 2018-06-04 14:06 EDT-0400 |", "15" ], [ "I think you're confusing a few things here. The CPU cooler you linked is an AIO. If you're looking for water blocks for your GPU, you'd most likely be seeing blocks for custom loops. Custom loops and AIO's are not the same and not compatible with each other. Despite that being semi-modular, it's still a AIO in the sense that you can't just add on another AIO with pump header. You'd be better off getting a separate AIO just for it, not to mention having separate loops would be better for water temps (people don't because custom loops are very expensive).\n\nNow if you want to use an AIO on your GPU, this is a possibility. You would just need a bracket like the NZXT G12 with a compatible AIO cooler. These types of solutions do tend to be lacking in the VRM cooling department, but it shouldn't be much of an issue.\n\nJust a heads up, none of this should be a concern because Pascal is limited in voltage, it's pretty hard to damage even if you try to.", "81" ], [ "> CPU Bottlenecks a GPU, not the other way around. And no.\n\n > A current or last generation i5/i7 will never bottleneck anything \navailable at the present time.\n\nI think you had it right the second time.\n\n > I'm not certain there has ever been a time where this wasn't the case.\n\nThere is but it's mainly just for competitive gaming. They turn graphics down all the way to get the highest FPS possible. This creates a CPU bottleneck. I think it's silly to do but hell, I'm not the one wasting a 1080Ti so w/e.", "153" ], [ "> Any recommendations for mine?\n\nKeep it simple, everything is over done nowadays (mine for example lol), there's something to be said about simple, clean, and well built. Yours checks all 3.\n\n > Should I add a second fan to my CPU cooler?\n\nI have extremely little experience with air coolers, been doing custom loops for a decade and a half now so I hate to comment on stuff I don't test for myself. However, if the same applies to air cooling, push/pull won't benefit much at all, and might just add noise.\n\n > Should I add 2 more fans to the top of the case?\n\nFor thermal reasons, it may help, it may not, tough to say because generally 3 fans in a small case is plenty to get the air in and out. Aesthetically, I would say no. There's a gap under your GPU and the gap up top kinda balances it out. Adding fans would make your build look top heavy and too busy up top.\n\n > I have my OS on the m.2 and my games on the SSD. Would I be better off selling both and getting a 1tb m.2 970 pro? My friend said its always better to have the games on a second drive. Never said why, and I never asked lol. \n\nFor gaming, NVME drives provide zero benefits outside heavy modded ones. It's expensive and does nothing for you that a standard SSD wouldn't. It does get rid of some cables though, but that's a steep price to pay for that.\n\nIt's better to put games on second drive because the OS running on the primary may take up some resources. My personal experience is this is negligible and makes no difference.", "81" ], [ "I bought all 3 monitors at once, for what I was going for it made sense and money wasn't an issue. [This is what they look like](_URL_1_)\n\nI actually didn't want a curved TV. When I was buying, I had every intention of getting the 75\" Samsung Q7F, which $3000 at the time. I decided to do some last minute browsing on similar TVs and ended up stumbling upon the 75\" Q8C, same TV but curved. It ended up being $2700, so it just made sense. [Here is what my TV looks like](_URL_0_)", "989" ], [ "Ryzen CPUs are not difficult to keep cool, and certainly do not require AIO/high end air coolers. AIO's also do not perform any better than their air cooling counter parts. \n\nIf you want the best AIO, then get the biggest radiator you can fit in your case. It's rather unnecessary but water cooling capacity is directly related to radiator surface area.", "81" ], [ "I would recommend youtubing tutorials first.\n\nPascal is slightly different than other architectures, there is only so much you can actually do. Here's how I OC on Pascal:\n\n- Turn voltage, power, and temp all the way up. This is completely safe because Pascal is limited to 1.093V anyways.\n\n- OC the memory first. This is going to be a bit different than normal, since memory can go rather high with no stability or artifact issues. Open up a benchmark and watch the FPS as you OC memory +50 at a time. There will be a point where framerate starts dropping off. Example: I can get my memory up to +800, but I get best performance at +350.\n\n- Put memory back to stock, and start OC'ing the core clock. Go in smaller increments here, maybe look up what other people were able to get it get a general idea.\n\n- Once you reach instability on core, back it off 10-20mhz and reapply the mem OC you got from before. \n\n- Bench and stability test with numbers you found to insure stability with both mem and core OC's. Monitor temps to make sure you don't get too hot. Take note of what boost clocks reach.", "121" ], [ "Nothing unless your temps are too hot. That CPU comes with a cooler is that good enough for everything up to mild-heavy OC. I generally don't recommend AIO's as they are rather expensive and provide no benefits outside of aesthetics. Occasionally, I see an instance where space constraints require an AIO, but as long as you realize you're paying a premium for looks, then there's nothing wrong with going AIO either.", "81" ], [ "It's nice having your work recognized and validated, even the people that hated my build. I built it as a show rig, it's intended purpose was for criticism. \n\nYea, definitely post your build when it's done. r/battlestations is a good place if you wanna include your entire setup. I'll be doing that soon, just need to clean first and i'm far too lazy lol.\n\nMore power to you if you can get over 21k upvotes! You'll be getting one from me.", "620" ], [ "First, it's going to produce heat. Bottom line.\n\nWhile the GPU produces the most heat, every other component also does as well. Lowering voltages would be the only way to reduce heat output (would probably require underclocking as well).\n\nI had a similar issue in college, as the dorms I lived in had no AC, and since I was in engineering all our dorm rooms got pretty toasty. We solved this by going to home depot and buying air duct tubing for pretty cheap, then taped the duct around the exhaust ports and out the window (some even hooked it up to a window fan for more efficiency). That's the only way you're going to get the heat down, as it's just the laws of physics.", "81" ], [ "> Is it the same as the 4 pin IDE connector\n\nNot sure what you mean by 4 pin IDE connect, as IDE was pre-sata days, and is a data cable.\n\n > Do I need to buy an adapter?\n\nPossible. 4 pin RGB headers are pretty standard, **BUT** there are 5V ones and 12V ones. If you get them mixed up, you can possibly damage something.\n\n > My mobo doesn't seem to have one (as I read newer mobos have the 4 pin RGB connector already).\n\nI don't see one on your mobo either\n\n > I want to get some leds, but not quite sure what do I need. Thanks for the help.\n\nJust buy a kit, like NZXT Hue or Corsair Lighting Node. Trying to find compatible stuff is a pain and probably won't even work like you want.", "968" ], [ "This entire post is rather confusing.\n\n > I mean the 4 pin IDE power connector (the name might be wrong, but its the one I plug the IDE HDS to), not the grey data cable (since it said 4 pin).\n\nGeneric RGB strip that you plug into 4 pin headers on your mobo don't require separate power. I am incredibly confused by the 4 pin IDE. Where did you get that from, can you link it? Are you referring to the 4 pin molex?\n\n > So if I buy an adapter where does it go in my pc, to which cable of my power supply.\n\nI have no idea what your PSU has anything to do with RGB strips. What kind of adapter are you referring to? None of this makes sense or has anything to do with one another.\n\n > I guess main concern is that my power supply is kinda old (but great) and I don't know if newer ones have connectors that mine doesn't have.\n\nAgain, not sure what your power supply has to do with this. It's just a power supply and has nothing to do with case lighting.", "968" ], [ "Ok I get it now lol....\n\nSo, first things first, don't buy that strip. You plug that into a RGB header on your motherboard, which you do not have. The header provides power and controls color. This isn't an option for you, and there are much much better options out there anyways.\n\nYou want something like [this](_URL_0_) or [this](_URL_1_) as they will include the rgb strips as well as the controller you need to use them.", "968" ], [ "1. Makes no real difference. Might as well use the NVMe as OS drive. If you look up benchmarks comparing NVMe to Sata, you'll see that any SSD will provide minimal load/boot times as the sequential speeds don't make much difference for these situations.\n\n2. No, unless you have sustained workloads that you did not list, you very likely will not need a heatsink. Monitoring temps will tell you for sure.", "448" ], [ "Value isn't much of an opinion. \n\nValue = price per performance. Both are measurable numbers.\n\nI don't know how one brand is better value than another brand. You buy individual cards, so when you are building/shopping, you compare one card to another. Not one brand to another.\n\nHaving a brand bias is doing yourself a disservice as you're literally counting out half your options for no real reason. However, it's your build so build it however you want, you can justify your parts any way you like.", "618" ], [ "You need to understand the information given by UBM.\n\nUBM compares your results to others with the same hardware. Since many people overclock, this will naturally skew the average results higher. This means a stock card will very likely fall in the 20-40 percentile.\n\nLook at your results, mainly the bell curve. Your GPU falls well within the bell curve, meaning there is nothing wrong.", "121" ], [ "Wait, you bought a 9900k, but you have a budget and can't afford a proper mobo, and you aren't overclocking, and this is mainly for gaming? I have a hard time making sense of this. \n\n > So my questions are, should I use this mobo with 9900k? \n\nAny Z390 motherboard can handle the 9900k at stock settings\n\n > Will it be able to handle the temp of the cpu?\n\nThat's rather irrelevant. The issue with cheap motherboard is power delivery as well as cooling the VRM's properly.\n\n > Also, I have a 650w power supply. Is it enough?\n\nYes", "592" ], [ "You may want to ask next time before investing $500 on a CPU. If you check benchmarks on current games, you'll see that the 9700k performs nearly identical at a decent amount less. This puts the 9900k extremely low on the value list, which is pretty counter productive to a budgeted upgrade. \n\nThe only way the 9900k would be more \"futureproof\" is if games can utilize more than 8 threads, which is pretty unlikely.", "153" ], [ "There are far too many factors to answer that with any certainty. Ambient temp, fan curves, case, etc.... Again, a 9900k should run fine at stock on any Z390 board, but it's impossible to say for sure.\n\nMobo suggestions would be minimum Z390 Aorus Pro Wifi, recommended Z390 Taichi or Aorus Ultra, you can always go over but it's diminishing value at that point.", "592" ], [ "1. What do you mean? Are you asking if the fans on the AIO can provide sufficient airflow for the rest of the components? \n\n2. It's always good to balance the airflow, so if you have 3 fans on the AIO, I would consider 2-3 more.\n\n3. Doesn't make much difference either way. \n\n4. They're just fans, don't overthink it. If you want the quietest, Noctua and Bequiet are the best IMO. Other than that, it won't make much difference.", "81" ], [ "The kraken is NZXT, not Razer. They both offer shit software but there is a difference nonetheless. \n\n > if the motherboard has no AIO_PUMP connector, how do you connect it?\n\nAttach it to any header, the AIO_PUMP is just a fan header with a higher amp rating to accommodate a pump. However, your AIO doesn't actually run off of that, it's only using it for the tach (notice there is only 1 wire running to the connector, and not 4).\n\nThe pump itself is powered via sata/molex power connector and is regulated via USB.", "81" ], [ "This isn't something we know mate, for one the drive hasn't even been out 8 years so literally impossible to test. My 840 Evo I got in 2013 is still running just fine now.\n\n > Does it mean that it has the potential to last 8+ years of average use? (small workloads, gaming and every day usage).\n\nSeems a bit conter-intuitive here mate. You pay extra for a 970 pro for speed and durability, yet your uses don't utilize the speed nor need the durability, so what do you wanting to pay extra for here? Why not just get a solid M.2 sata ssd for half the price?", "448" ], [ "I wouldn't recommend paper towel for 2 reasons. 1) It leaves behind small fibers/pieces and 2) it's basically fine sand paper.\n\nIsopropyl alcohol is preferred as it's just iso and water so it won't leave behind anything, it dries extremely quickly, and it breaks down dried thermal paste well.\n\nYou don't need it, but it's cheap and widely available so there's not much reason not to.\n\nAs for paper towels, I recommend using cotton swabs/pads and/or coffee filters instead.", "229" ], [ "> I know SSDs would technically be better for gaming since they give you shorter loading times, but if I get two SSDs, would the loading times be like 2x faster?\n\nNo, this would only be true if the drive accounted for 100% of the load time, but that isn't how it works as there are obviously other parts that factor in, like CPU and memory.\n\nThe drive \"speed\" you are referring to also doesn't play much role. What does is the access times which are significantly faster on a SSD (solid state drive) than a mechanical HDD, since the SSD is completely electronic data can be located and loaded extremely fast.\n\nBecause of this, drive speed past any regular sata SSD doesn't make much difference to load times, and load times reliance on drive speed becomes extremely minimal. At this point, you could have a drive that is instantaneous and it still wouldn't lower load times by all that much.", "448" ], [ "If you install Windows on your SSD, then your computer will boot from your SSD. Same goes for your games and programs, it'll load from wherever you install it.\n\nFor people using SSD and HDD, the general usage is games and programs get installed on SSD, HDD is used for file storage like movies, pictures, documents, music, etc... Some games (like Rocket League or CSGO) don't take long to load as it is, so you may consider throwing those on HDD as well.\n\nAs for your SSD + HDD or SSD + SSD, there isn't a correct way to go. It comes down to personal preference as well as use. For my gaming PC, I run only SSD's since all it is used for is loading games. I have another PC that I use as a general purpose/network PC so that one I just use a small SSD for OS and a bunch of HDD's for storage.", "448" ], [ "You need to distinguish between two issues here. Mainly, you are talking about NVMe drives, as the increased throughput creates more heat. This isn't any sort of concern on Sata drives (minus that silly RGB one).\n\nThe second issue here is that extra cooling for NVMe drives is *not* recommend in most cases, as most cases will have sufficient airflow to keep them cool with the stock cooling (generally the sticker is copper). NAND likes running hotter, it was designed that way, cooling them down improperly can actually be detrimental. Only the controller as u/Potato_Plays844 mentioned needs to be cooled, but again this isn't an issue in most cases so use the drive the way it was designed. This isn't a case of \"just do it to be safe\".", "81" ], [ "It's a bit unusual, I would expect overnight to be shipped at lastest the following day it was ordered, then delivered the following day (in your case, Thursday). Generally, the ridiculous costs of overnight trigger a red flag for most companies that the stuff needs to be out the door ASAP.\n\nWith a store like Microcenter being more focused on brick and mortar though, it's a bit more understandable.", "691" ], [ "Yikes.\n\nThis is a competitive industry first and foremost, and you're giving a very one sided story. It's really quite simple.\n\nIntel was (still kinda is) king for gaming. They know this, AMD knows this, we all know this. They charge us stupid amounts because they know people will pay premium to have the best, as their competitive has nothing to offer. We get mad at Intel because they take advantage of this and charge us the premium.\n\nThis doesn't mean we \"ignore\" AMD. Instead, we fault them for not being able to compete and hope they can (which they did with Zen2). Competition is good for the consumer, we benefit in performance as well as value.\n\nThis example can be easily replicated when you look at GPU's, with Nvidia charging $1200 for a 2080Ti because AMD can't compete.\n\n > Why are people fanboying so much?\n\nYou're in the wrong sub if you think we \"fanboy\" here. We advise based on value. This isn't PCMR, we couldn't give 2 shits about Intel vs AMD vs Nvidia outside of the fact that more competition means we all benefit, so we may root for AMD to do well but it has nothing to do with being a fanboy, save that meme crap for another sub.", "816" ], [ "> AMD for Pure Gaming because \"it's better value\" even tho Intel is clearly still leading in that Department\n\nIntel is leading in value? How so? The only one I can see is the 9400f with a recent price drop is pretty good value. Seeing as your account is 4 months old, you probably don't remember us recommending the 8400 for like 90% of budget builds. In fact, Ryzen gen1 was hardly recommended here at all, it was strictly Intel if the word \"gaming\" was anywhere in the post.\n\n > If i said that, i get downvoted hard.\n\nYou wouldn't get downvoted if you backed with with actual information... What you are failing to realize is this sub is facts and opinions. Facts are benchmarks, core counts, etc.... Opinions are everything else. If you give a valid opinion with facts, the majority of regulars here would have no issue backing you up. \n\n > Don't say there's no Fanboys here Man, that's just bullshit.\n\nI will absolutely say that, because I've been in [this sub regularly for years now](_URL_0_). I recommend what I feel is best for the poster, I couldn't give 2 shits who makes it. If you think I'm wrong, then I have zero issue having a discussion about it, I'm always open to new opinions. I can tell you, having spoken to many of the regular responders here over the years, the vast majority go about it the same way. If you back it with legit information, I have no problem changing my mind.\n\nIt's absolutely asinine to group the \"fanboys\" in with the majority of us here. We do this shit for free to help others, in our spare time.", "153" ], [ "That's fine, and it's also why we specifically request people put their location in when they post. If they don't, it doesn't make us AMD fanboys for advising based on US pricing. \n\nThese posts are absolutely ridiculous, 2 years ago we got these posts calling us Intel shills because we recommended the 8400 all the time. Yet we have the same regulars responding, and now it's people calling us AMD fanboys. Yall just need to make up your minds. u/psimwork u/coololly", "85" ], [ "> Last thing I want is to waste wonga on parts that will be overkill where I can spend it better in other areas\n\nIf you're looking for the best value, you're going about it a little backwards here. Look up benchmarks comparing the 9900k to the 9700k, then compare the prices. You should also know that custom looping is probably the lowest value upgrade you can make, there is next to zero benefit including performance noise, it's a lot of money for 99% aesthetics. Source: I build custom loops, check my post history.", "592" ], [ "I don't think you should remove the comment next time, upvotes and downvotes mean nothing.\n\nThe point of this sub is to expose people to as many opinions as possible, that's how people make the best decisions. You don't buy a GPU after reading one review on Amazon, you make a decision by reading multiple reviews from multiple sources. You read positive ones, and you read negative ones. Who cares if it's downvoted, people read it and thought about it, that's what's important. \n\nAnd I'm not so much trying to be defensive, this is a public domain after all and anyone can choose to respond or not. What irritates me is being grouped in with PCMR and that nonsense. I know what we do here, we've been called Intel biased, AMD biased, Nvidia biased. We've been called it all.", "263" ], [ "You don't see any because \"best\" is 100% subjective. We all see differently, we all prefer different things and we all have different budgets. Plus there are products coming out all the time, it would be a job by itself just to keep an updated list of monitors.\n\nInstead, figure out the features you want/need, then narrow it down to the monitors that have them. From there, read reviews defining the key aspects that are important to you. _URL_0_ is a good place to start, as is _URL_1_", "989" ], [ "You shouldn't just buy stuff like this if you don't even know how it's going to benefit you.\n\nNVMe drives are *not* going to benefit gamers and general purpose users in any meaningful way. They are a lot faster than sata SSD's in *sequential* read and write speeds, making them great for working with large, single files like editting 4k videos. However, most people just looking for fast load/boot times are not going to benefit, as that relies more on access times. \n\nSo if you're after the best value here, you're barking up the wrong tree as you aren't really benefiting (albeit I have no idea what you are using it for still, but I'm assuming it's not heavy productivity work). Instead, why not get a quality M.2 sata SSD like WD Blue or MX500, as that would technically be the best value.", "448" ], [ "To understand what a bottleneck is means you need to understand the CPU and GPU relationship for gaming. In general, the CPU tells the GPU what to render, and the GPU does all the rendering. Based on this relationship, CPU generally only cares about framerate. Hence when we size a CPU for a build, knowing the refresh rate of the monitor is the most important part, since then we know what the target framerate is. \n\n > but the fact that Im talking about a high end GPU should tell you something about where and in which games the bottleneck might occur.\n\nIt literally does not. Your CPU requirement for 4k/60hz is a lot less than 1080p/240hz or 1440/144hz, yet we would likely size the same GPU for all 3.", "404" ], [ "Not sure what benefits you are looking for but if it's just quality you want, then get a gold rated PSU that's of good quality. Titanium rated PSU's are a complete waste of money and it would take roughly a decade of running your PC 24/7 to make the money back in energy savings.\n\nSeasonic Focus Gold, EVGA G2/G3, Bitfenix Formula Gold, or Corsair TXM/RMx are my recs.", "592" ], [ "That has nothing to do with crypto. The inflated prices are because it's an obsolete item that was replaced when 20 series came out (or rather in this case, the 1660/1660Ti). Since pricing is dependent on supply and demand, with supply never increasing, the pricing will only go up.\n\nYou can find the same issue with any PC hardware. Try buying a 4770k brand new and you'll see the pricing is stupid high.", "1008" ], [ "Watercooling is almost never \"worth it\", assuming worth it means value to you. Not sure if you've heard otherwise.\n\nThere isn't really a temperature difference unless we get to surface areas that air coolers just can't allow (such as a 360mm radiator). Since a 240-280mm can cool just about every CPU on the market overclocked, then 99% of the time going watercooling is a purely aesthetic decision.", "81" ], [ "This is so strange...\n\nWith that large of a IHS, you would likely use the same methods as you would a TR but on a bigger scale. Likely, a big fat X across the chip would do, but maybe watch some videos on TR application.\n\n > But the CPU is slightly squishy.\n\nWhat? I would imagine this would lend itself to the spreading method, as the generally \"let the pressure spread it\" method might not be so effective.", "968" ], [ "> I stable OCed my CPU to 5ghz@all cores\n\nWhat voltage?\n\n > I feel that I can get better temps with better case.\n\nRun your PC with your side panel off, how much do your temps improve? You can also test with front panel off.\n\nIt sounds like to me, you haven't tested any of this and you're just trying to justify scratching your upgrade itch, which is fine but I don't see any issues with your current setup.", "121" ], [ "You haven't listed anything here requiring sustained read/write speeds. All I see is OS, gaming, and various files. \n\nIf your productivity work requires that much sustained read/writes, then sticking with Samsung would likely be beneficial for both drives. Otherwise, for OS, gaming, and various files you aren't utilizing that, so it's not really going to make any difference worth mentioning. At that point, just get what's cheap, or stick to a reliable M.2 sata drive.", "448" ], [ "What is your intended resolution and refresh? What games do you play?\n\nYou aren't benefitting from NVMe speeds, so getting a 2TB one that costs $300 is wasting money. Either stick to a M.2 sata drive or get a cheaper NVMe, they'll be extremely similar for gaming. Save $100+ here.\n\nI can't really comment on your CPU/GPU selection as I don't have answers to above questions, but this doesn't seem ideal IMO. \n280mm isn't really needed unless you plan on really pushing your CPU for daily driving. You could get relatively the same performance out of a $80 air cooler, so don't spend $140+ here.", "592" ], [ "That extra cooler is pointless, the included one is good enough. If you want an aftermarket cooler, you can do much better for $40.\n\n590 isn't enough of an upgrade from 580 to justify the price, IMO.\n\nI believe JonnyGuru labeled that PSU \"the worst PSU ever made\". So yea, I would advise getting a better quality PSU.", "81" ], [ "Your current setup is fine, and is considered ideal. \n\nPush/Pull won't realistically make any difference worth noting, and it's generally not a good idea to put different fans on opposite sides of a radiator.\n\n > I have 2 spare stock fans and im just wondering if i would notice an improvement by doing that\n\nThere are a million variables here that are not accounted for. The only way to answer this is to test it yourself.", "81" ], [ "This doesn't make sense. AIO as exhaust means heat from CPU goes through the rad, that's the logic behind it. AIO as intake means you are blowing warm air from rad through the case, so CPU won't be getting fresh air.\n\nFrom testing and verified through other benchmarks, the difference here is generally negligible as air won't be saturated with heat. This can vary case to case though.", "81" ], [ "Larger distributors are generally cheaper, my assumption would be bulk purchasing discounts.\n\nIf you live near a Microcenter, CPU and mobo deals are generally second to none. Other components tend to have fairly competitive pricing as well.\n\nIf you live near a Best Buy, you can likely have them price match other retailers like Newegg or Amazon.\n\nOtherwise, check out the PCPP retailer list for the region you live.", "217" ], [ "Full transparency here.\n\nGrey market is called grey as it is a mix of legit and not legit keys. As we do not have the resources to vet every single rec, we just don't allow any of them. This is for the safety of both our users, and the sub as a whole as illegal suggestions could easily result in the subsequent suspension/banning of the subreddit. Not to mention, the common occurrence of deactivated keys which we do not want to handle in the sub.\n\nRunning unactivated, which this is a breach of ToS, is considered safe to do, as Microsoft has never been known to go after anyone for this, and their general stance seems to be rather mute on the subject. As we do not allow grey market suggestions, this was what we considered the best alternative to budget builds that can be recommended safely, as the only other alternatives are free OS's like Ubuntu, which is not ideal to recommend to beginners. \n\nWhile we are rather lax on moderating the latter, we generally encourage responders to at least inform users of the ToS.", "370" ], [ "The amount you can overclock to is up to the silicon lottery (I had a couple 8700k's that could not run 5.0 stable). Since that's a relatively high OC for daily driving, having a mobo with good VRMs to supply power is certainly more ideal.\n\nThere are lots of mobos between a Steel Legend and Aorus Master.\n\nAt minimum, I would suggest Asrock Extreme4 or Aorus Pro boards. Ideally, you'd want something like a Taichi, Aorus Ultra, or Hero.", "121" ], [ "I've built with 8th and 9th gen Intel quite a bit.\n\nZ370/Z390 Taichi or Aorus Ultra stood out as 2 boards I used most for higher end builds. I'm [currently still running the Z390 Aorus Ultra](_URL_0_) with my 9900k. I ran my previous 8700k's on [a Z370 Taichi](_URL_2_). For 300 series, Gigabyte did the best IMO, as I did also buy a Z390i Aorus Pro Wifi for [my SFF build](_URL_1_).", "592" ], [ "Activation doesn't always carry over. You can always try, but it doesn't always work. You can also try contacting Microsoft and ask them to transfer it in the event that it doesn't, they might just help you out.\n\nOption 2: We do not discuss grey market in this subreddit per rule #3\n\nOption 3: You can buy from an authorized distributor like Newegg. This will save you some money (OEM keys for $99 currently, $120 for retail)\n\nYou can run unactivated with no limitations outside of personalization and the watermark. It should be noted that this is in fact a breach of Microsoft's ToS, although they don't really seem to care.", "574" ], [ "This is not the correct subreddit, as laptops have nothing to do with the process of building a PC.\n\nThe issue here is laptops use different hardware, much of it being proprietary. This would require knowledge of such hardware, which many desktop users will not have. \n\nI've been building for a long time, and couldn't answer this question with 100% certainty without calling Lenovo and inquiring about channel configuration on their laptops.", "127" ], [ "> but I don’t understand the difference between motherboards?\n\nFor starters, chipsets determine compatibility with CPUs. Different chipsets offer different features, like X570 has PCIe4.0 chipset lanes while B550 only has it on CPU lanes.\n\nIf we're comparing within the same chipset, then differences come down to features and quality. Generally, higher end motherboards offer more features, like additional ports, better debugging features, better power delivery, etc...", "153" ], [ "Air cooling would likely be quieter.\n\nIn this case as your CPU won't saturate the best air coolers available, water cooling won't provide a noticeable advantage as additional surface area is not needed.\n\nGiven you use the same fans to dissipate heat through a heatsink/radiator, watercooling (assuming comparable performance) would be louder as you also have a pump. \n\nIf noise is your concern, oversize the cooler so you can dissipate the same heat running the fans lower. Ant tower cooler would be fine here. I typically recommend Noctua or Bequiet for noise oriented cooler suggestions as their fans are among the quietest.", "81" ], [ "Sequential speeds matter very little for loading times, or \"snappiness\" of a system. NVMe vs Sata makes very little difference here. You can look up benchmarks to confirm, there are plenty at this point. For gaming/loading/booting, I would certainly go with 2TB as difference isn't noticeable and you get twice the capacity.\n\nWhere NVMe does benefit you is possibly in video editting, were editting or transferring large files will benefit from the faster sequential speeds. If this isn't something you do daily though, it probably still isn't worth it, or at least not one of the most expensive NVMe drives available. There are much cheaper ones like Crucial P1, Intel 660p, or Sabrent Rocket that you could be considering instead.", "448" ], [ "<PERSON>, this is quite impossible for me to advise anything as you haven't given me any specifics. \n\n > So I would be able to use any motherboard with a cpu and graphics card?\n\nNo, again chipsets determine compatibility with CPU. GPU compatibility isn't much concern, unless you have a motherboard from 2003. You can use the built in compatibility feature on PCPP if you are not sure.\n\n > Would it be better for me to get a motherboard with multiple ram slots?\n\nEvery modern motherboard has multiple ram slots\n\n > I’m planning on using 2x32gb (64gb) of ram and thought that would be better than just 32 but would it be better to get a motherboard with more ram slots for more 32gb ram sticks.\n\nWhat workload do you have that would benefit from 64GB of memory? If you don't need 32GB of memory, then having 64GB isn't going to benefit you by any amount worth mentioning.", "592" ], [ "You could use a Sata SSD and likely not notice any difference in load times. Or just get a cheaper NVMe like Crucial P1, you aren't benefiting much from NVMe so I wouldn't recommend one of the most expensive ones. \n\nSustained workloads utilize the SSD for an extended period of time working with large files. Loading your game is a few seconds of random read/write and that's it, which is a much different workload than editting/transferring a 300GB 4k video file for an hour.", "448" ], [ "> Assuming the sticks you have are fine speed wise\n\nWe are not assuming this, as we don't have any info from OP. So adding 2x4 could lead to worse *potential* performance. Given 8GB sticks of DDR4 are far more common, the price point is likely worth it, depending on current speed/timings.\n\n4 sticks is also more load on the IMC which can make it more difficult for overclocking or stability at higher speeds. Again, no info so it's impossible to say with any certainly.\n\nOP could be running older HEDT, in which case maybe he has quad channel. etc...", "592" ], [ "> I just need help with what I need to do to get deep rich bass from this setup.\n\nI understand that but I don't understand the underlying issue, which is why I'm asking all these questions. For all I know, your expectations could be the issue, and I have no gauge as to how much bass you are getting.\n\nCan you hook the speakers up to another amp/receiver? Does it sound better?\n\nCan you hook the amp up to other speakers? Does it sound better?\n\nIs the amp plugged into your motherboard? Did you install the onboard sound drivers? Do you have an external DAC? Did you install drivers for that? What is the audio source? Can you try a different source with known output?", "872" ], [ "Your prebuilt had an OEM key, therefore cannot be transferred.\n\nYou have 3 options on how to proceed:\n\n1) Call Microsoft and ask if they will transfer the activation to your new build. They might, but probably not. Worth a shot though.\n\n2) Run W10 unactived. This is technically a breach of Microsoft's TOS, but generally considered safe to do. Only limitations here are personalization settings, as well as the overlayed watermark.\n\n3) Buy a new key. If you buy a retail key, they would be able to transfer if you plan to upgrade again.", "159" ], [ "> Just doesn’t seem to hold up to the performance of liquid cooling unless you have the absolute bulkiest heatsink hanging off of your board.\n\nThey function the same, water cooling doesn't somehow destroy heat. If we compare a radiator and a heatsink that have relatively the same amount of surface area, then they will perform relatively the same as well. So unless you have a CPU that saturates the biggest air cooler out there, then performance would essentially be the same up to that point.\n\nJust some quick advice, diving into the deep end here might not be the best idea. Custom looping as is is primarily research and planning, which is about 80% of the process. That part becomes vastly easier once you dip your feet in and acclimate yourself to how it works, why we do it, and what needs to get done. Hardline is much more difficult than soft tubing, and you're greatly increasing chances of leaks as well. I would certainly recommend starting with soft tubing first, then jump to hard line after you have one build under your belt. All you would need to do is change out fitting and worry about the bends, rather than try to solve all your problems at once as a beginner.", "81" ], [ "I don't know who you are, but I certainly believe you are capable of doing it as well. Just my opinion, but it's more or less an unnecessary risk, and I think you're making it harder on yourself.\n\nJumping into the deep end isn't always a good thing, sometimes learning to float first gives you advantages you weren't aware of. Understanding the process in this case, can greatly reduce any possible complications you might run into, as introducing hard line adds complications of it's own. \n\nYou're going to have to learn all the stuff involved with both soft tubing and hard tubing anyways, so why not learn and be able to practice once at least, before making it harder right off the bat and risking expensive hardware while doing so?\n\nPlus having soft tubing components around makes troubleshooting much easier, should you have other issues arise.", "742" ], [ "That was not mentioned in the post.\n\nHow much is up to the silicon lottery, there is no set number. Look up tutorials and guides on how to overclocked your exact GPU, many of them will include conservative numbers to try. \n\nJust to make you aware, you'll only really see a difference in performance if you stare at a FPS counter while playing games. Even then, I wouldn't expect too much.", "757" ], [ "Hello, and thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed. Please note the following from our [subreddit rules](_URL_1_):\n\n > No submissions about memes, jokes, meta, or hypothetical / dream builds.\n\n/r/buildapc is a community dedicated to helping those who need assistance in building or troubleshooting their PCs. To keep discussion on topic, hypothetical or dream builds, memes, meta and joke posts are not permitted.\n\n\n\nThank you.\n\n---\n\n[^(Click here to message the moderators if you have any questions or concerns)](_URL_0_)", "477" ], [ "Between those 2 drives, difference is negligible, and you aren't using sequential speeds much for load times anyways. The big difference here is the DRAM, which makes the SN750 more appealing for your use.\n\nYou can look up NVMe vs Sata for load times and you'll see even this comparison makes very little difference, and the gap here in sequential speeds is much much greater.\n\nI would suggest a cheaper SSD with DRAM, either Sata or NVMe. MX500 or WD Blue are my recs for Sata. P1, 660p, or Sabrent Rocket are my recs for cheaper NVMe.", "448" ], [ "This post is likely better suited for PCMR. \"Fanboying\" tends to get called out rather quickly in most instances here as we're a help forum offering advice.\n\nMany people appreciate AMD in recent times for many reasons. They've offered better value in the low-mid range for both CPUs and GPUs, they tend to lower pricing on previous generations (mainly CPUs), they're kept their word and supported the AM4 socket through 2020 (with some caveats), and most importantly they offered competition which has greatly accelerated technology for the consumer in the past 4-5 years.\n\n > Why is there so much fanboying for companies in this hobby?\n\nYou can literally say that about any hobby. Ford vs Chevy, Apple vs Microsoft, etc.... It's completely OK to be enthusiastic about supporting a company.", "85" ], [ "_URL_0_\n\nThere is a section labeled **USB**\n\n\t\nChipset:\n\n1 x USB Type-C™ port on the back panel, with USB 3.2 Gen 2 support\n\n1 x USB Type-C™ port with USB 3.2 Gen 1 support, available through the internal USB header\n\n2 x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports (red) on the back panel\n\n5 x USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports (3 ports on the back panel, 2 ports available through the internal USB header)\n\nChipset+2 USB 2.0 Hubs:\n\n8 x USB 2.0/1.1 ports (4 ports on the back panel, 4 ports available through the internal USB headers)", "968" ], [ "PCIe4.0 is twice the bandwidth of PCIe3.0\n\nThat additional bandwidth is utilized in sustained sequential read and writes. If you don't have usages with large, single files, then that additional speed isn't going to translate to anything noticeable improves. In fact, NVMe in general doesn't prove any noticeable differences to any Sata SSD for most uses. Maybe your video editting or rendering, but even then I'd assume upgrading the rest of your hardware would go much further.", "448" ], [ "> Individually? How would that work?\n\nI mean, it would obviously depend on the program you are using. Take for example mining, you run each card on it's own, despite there being just one program doing one task. I believe Redshift and Octane both leverage individual GPUs as well.\n\nNVLink and SLI before that sync the cards. For SLI, the cards are synced and function according to a profile to tell them how they are to render (AFR or 1:1 for gaming). In this instance, each card needs to access the same data at the same time, so VRAM is cloned and not shared. I believe NVLink is much different, and is something I did not research at all as I was only interested in the SLI functionality which in large part is dead at this point.", "545" ], [ "2 cards for gaming is pointless, the second card would literally just hang there as you said. SLI is dead, AMD abandoned it altogether and Nvidia only has it on the 3090 (which is in reality not really a gaming card to begin with). Not only that, SLI (which on 3090 would be SLI over NVLink) requires support from the game itself to function well, otherwise you get minimal (sometimes negative) framerate improvements with added microstutter while still pulling twice the power (30% improvement to framerate is considered good here...). Then you add in DX12 opts for mGPU over SLI, meaning support in the future is nonexistent. AFAIK only Tomb Raider can use multi GPU running DX12, you can't even force SLI in any other DX12 title. Taking it another step further, the only games you would benefit from SLI, I'd be shocked if a single 3090 wouldn't be overkill as it is. \n\nI don't see any reason here why you wouldn't just run them individually.", "816" ], [ "> -Who has the best quality for the price with custom loop parts?\n\nThey're just machined parts, use whoever you want. They all use industry standard g1/4 so you can use multiple companies if you wanted to. Barrow/Barrowch or Bykski are probably the most common \"budget\" brands, but given how low value custom looping is it doesn't make much sense to be shopping for cheapest possible. You're already paying hundreds for just aesthetics.\n\nMixing and matching is just fine as long as you're not mixing metals.\n\n > My build plans are as follows\n\nYou're going to build with soft tubing and then hard tubing? That's going to cost you quite a bit more, fittings are not cheap. Leaking testing with soft tubing isn't going to mean your rigid tubing setup won't leak. Most leaks are from the fittings/tubing anyways.", "885" ], [ "> I will note it will cost a me around an extra £100 for the full system water cooling\n\nUmm... I've never built a loop for that cheap. It's multiple times more. GPU block alone is probably more. At minimum, a kit from EK would be $400 USD for both CPU and GPU. You might do it for slightly cheaper if you go aluminum but that's certainly less than ideal. In general, my loops costs upwards of $800+ USD.\n\nAnd you should note, it's almost purely for aesthetics. Worth it in this case is whether or not the aesthetics are worth the hundreds of dollars it costs. For many of us that custom loop as a hobby, it's worth it. For your average gamer that just wants a working PC without the hassle of planning, building, and maintaining a loop, it's probably not worth it.", "217" ], [ "I'm not understanding, you want to just leave the stock fans on the front and put the QL fans directly inside? What purpose would your new QL fans serve at this point besides just aesthetics.\n\nIt's generally not idea to have push/pull with different fans, much less without a radiator in between. You're probably just adding noise at this point, you aren't moving 2x the amount of air.", "81" ], [ "> Crypto is a huge portion of the problem\n\nMost people are not going to buy new cards to mine mate...\n\nFor one, Bitcoin is nearly impossible to mine using consumer cards as at this point the difficulty is too high and the competition is mining farms filled with ASICs miners.\n\nThat means your average miner is likely mining ETH, which isn't all that profitable. Most miners out there are using *existing* hardware that they already own, or bought a new GPU for their personal use and mine with it when they're AFK. If you bought a brand new GPU with only the purpose of mining, especially in this current market, it would take a year or more to make your money back, probably more given the decline of ETH pricing recently.\n\nLinus just put out a video addressing this if you don't want to listen to a random internet stranger: _URL_0_\n\nTo be straight, I'm not saying it's not contributing to the problem, but it's certainly not nearly as big a deal as most people think.", "543" ], [ "For just a gaming workload, 8700 and 9900k would perform pretty close to the same as their single core performance is about the same. Where the 9900k has the advantage is with 8core/16thread compared to 8700 which is 6core/12thread. For CSGO, 8 cores is rather meaningless.\n\nYou may benefit in streaming here if you are CPU encoding, although at this point upgrading your GPU would provide benefit to all your games and new RTX cards can utilize NVENC to encode with very little performance penalty.", "153" ], [ "The primary focus of this subreddit is helping people with the process of building a PC. As this question gets asked about a hundred times a day, and we obviously cannot see the future, posts asking for such advice are actively removed. Our priority is people with relevant questions pertaining to how to build a PC, not how to shop for PC parts. Keeping the feed clear for those people will continue to be prioritized.", "217" ], [ "I'm guessing OP is referring to mGPU on DX12, which would require developer support to utilize multiple GPUs to render the game.\n\nThis is distinctly different than SLI as mGPU cannot be forced without native support. Currently, the only game I know that supports this is Tomb Raider, and a couple benchmarks.\n\nWhich means.... developers likely won't implement mGPU as that's additional work aimed at an incredibly niche crowd and multi-GPU should not be used for any practical gaming PC.", "545" ], [ "> This is extremely relevant to the topic. \n\nNo, it is not. Again, we do not help people shop here. If you read our sub rules, it is very clear we do not offer advice on shopping for components. Again, we are focused on the actual process of building a PC, not picking components (rule #2), shopping for components, sales and deals, or anything that has to do with purchasing of hardware. \n\n > I'm not asking for psychics. I'm asking for data. News. Information.\n\nThe entire supply chain, from TSMC to AIB, is at max capacity and there is a global supply shortage of transistors that has even affected the automobile industry at this point. Asking \"when will parts be in stock\" is absolutely asking us to predict the future, the manufacturer's themselves don't even know. This is why you got the responses you did, we're literally all in the same boat and no one has any answers. Everyone has been asking this for 6 months now and there isn't a single person in the world that can answer this with any accuracy. \n\nIf you don't believe me, here is a video <PERSON> put out a couple days ago addressing this exact issue and why no one has any answers.\n\n_URL_0_", "493" ], [ "Hello, and thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed. Please note the following from our [subreddit rules](_URL_0_):\n\n**Rule 11: No selling, trading or requests for valuation**\n\n > If you want to buy, sell or trade hardware you should do so on /r/hardwareswap. Price evaluations should be requested through [/r/hardwareswap's Discord server](_URL_1_). \n\n > Discussions of privately buying, selling or trading software are not permitted.\n\n\n\nThank you.\n\n---\n\n[^(Click here to message the moderators if you have any questions or concerns)](_URL_2_)", "804" ], [ "[PCPartPicker part list](_URL_8_/list/GZRQyX) / [Price breakdown by merchant](_URL_8_/list/GZRQyX/by_merchant/)\n\nType|Item|Price\n:----|:----|:----\n**CPU** | [Intel - Core i5-8600K 3.6GHz 6-Core Processor](_URL_7_) | $238.99 @ Amazon \n**CPU Cooler** | [Noctua - NH-U9S 46.4 CFM CPU Cooler](_URL_6_) | $57.19 @ Newegg \n**Motherboard** | [ASRock - Z370 Pro4 ATX LGA1151 Motherboard](_URL_5_) | $96.98 @ Newegg \n**Memory** | [Team - Dark 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 Memory](_URL_4_) | $149.99 @ Newegg \n**Storage** | [Samsung - 860 Evo 500GB 2.5\" Solid State Drive](_URL_0_) | $113.88 @ OutletPC \n**Video Card** | [MSI - GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB Video Card](_URL_3_) | $459.99 @ B & H \n**Case** | [Rosewill - Challenger S ATX Mid Tower Case](_URL_1_) | $48.04 @ Amazon \n**Power Supply** | [SeaSonic - FOCUS Plus Gold 650W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply](_URL_8_/product/WrNypg/seasonic-focus-plus-gold-650w-80-gold-certified-fully-modular-atx-power-supply-ssr-650fx) | $69.99 @ Newegg \n**Wireless Network Adapter** | [TP-Link - TL-WDN4800 PCI-Express x1 802.11a/b/g/n Wi-Fi Adapter](_URL_2_) | $35.01 @ Amazon \n | *Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts* |\n | Total (before mail-in rebates) | $1320.06\n | Mail-in rebates | -$50.00\n | **Total** | **$1270.06**\n | Generated by [PCPartPicker](_URL_8_) 2018-06-29 11:56 EDT-0400 |\n\n- No reason to get 7th gen, when the 8600K is better and cheaper. Also, no point in getting a K chip with a B board.\n\n- Faster memory doesn't cost a whole lot more\n\n- You don't need the expensive SSD\n\n- Added cheaper 1070 Ti, although I guess since you're in Canadia you may not be able to get this\n\n- Changed PSU, but that's just my preference, again may be difference since you're in Canadia", "15" ], [ "> I have a pre-built one and it's pretty bottleneck\n\nOh dear... please no\n\n > It says the parts are compatible, but there has to be more too it, right?\n\nNo, PCPP does all the work for you\n\n > Please let me know if it will break without liquid cooling or something!\n\nI don't understand this? Why would it break without liquid cooling.\n\n- Don't get 7th gen Intel, there's no reason to when a 8th gen i5 out performs it and costs $100 less.\n\n- Don't get a B board with a K chip", "81" ], [ "Wow is pretty CPU dependent, as are most MMORPGs, that's why I asked.\n\nHere's the thing, at max/ultra settings for most games, your max FPS will be determined by your GPU (except MMO's). When dealing with high refresh monitors though, many people will turn down graphic settings to achieve the desired framerate to match their refresh. When you do this, you are putting a bigger strain on your CPU to keep up with putting out that many frames that fast (aka creating a CPU bottleneck). Some CPUs can't even reach 144hz regardless of the GPU.\n\nThis information is important, as your GPU can clearly handle 1080p, but with the increased refresh, it's up to you to tweak the settings to achieve the desired performance.", "404" ], [ "> Considering a Xeon E5450 which I saw for 30$. Someone told me they wouldn't buy a Xeon if they were me, is there any particular reason for this?\n\nXeon processors are for workstations, they weren't designed for gaming at all. That's like trying to drink soup using a fork.\n\nYou're GPU is also pretty weak, granted your resolution and refresh are relatively low, still your system is going to struggle to run Fortnite. I would recommend saving your money for a gaming system.", "757" ], [ "NVMEs are significantly faster than SSDs in sequential read and write, the random read and write is not nearly that big of a gap. This makes NVME drives great for scratch disks and production, but game/program loads as well as booting windows, you won't see much difference at all. Not to mention, booting off NVMEs is different than booting off sata, so that may not even be faster at all. Use it however you want, as any benefits would likely be marginal at best.\n\nAlso, heat shouldn't really be an issue for these, they are designed to run a tad hot. The only thing is, if you have it above the GPU, it may get hotter than it should and throttle.", "448" ], [ "For many people that do editing and stuff like that, they are loading large files such as videos and working on them. This would be using sequential read and write. I'm no expert on this stuff so I would recommend doing your own research as far as exact applications.\n\nFor loading games and programs, that does use random read and write though, so no you won't really benefit from NVME and it's more or less just an expensive SSD. This is why for gaming builds, we don't recommend NVME drives, while m.2 sata drives are great as pricing is relatively the same and you eliminate wires.", "448" ], [ "You take two cards that are the same (we won't get into different SLI), and they share the workload. There are a couple ways this works.\n\n- The primary card runs as normal, with the secondary card filling in gaps when the primary card falls behind.\n\n- The primary and secondary cards render every other frame, ideally doubling the output\n\n- VRAM is cloned between the 2 cards, that way they each can access the same information at the same time (so if you have 2 cards that each have 4gb VRAM, you still only have 4gb VRAM when you SLI)", "968" ], [ "Keep in mind though, each game needs a profile that tells the cards how to work with each other. Very few games have official profiles, and no new games do. Support for these profiles has also ceased to exist and the industry is moving away from SLI. \n\nOn top of that, you can create a profile for each game, however since they were not designed to be run using SLI, this often leads to issues involving stability, bad scaling, increased power consumption, and microstutter. That is why we tell people to stay away from SLI.", "659" ], [ "Fair enough, it looks like the VRM temps aren't too high either but I just wanted to make sure as I've seen it happen where people mistakenly cool the chokes and not mosfets. \n\nIf you don't mind me asking, what were your temps before this? How much were you able to drop? Also, how much did you OC? I'm a bit surprised with such good temps, your boost clock didn't go higher than 2012MHz.\n\nEither way, looks good man", "121" ], [ "It's Pascal, go ahead and up the voltage all the way, you're capped at 1.093V anyways. You can also up the temp and power all the way.\n\nFrom +100, go up by intervals of 5 until you reach the point of instability. You can then back it off by 5-15ish and you should be good. For mem, I went by intervals of 50 with Heaven running the entire time. You should be able to reach really really high numbers here, but after a certain point there is no increased performance (mine can go up to +850, but around +350 is my max gained).\n\nFor reference, my card is at +135 core and +350 mem. Boost clocks reach 2101 core and 3002 memory. You should be able to get close to those numbers (I am custom looped and got lucky in the lottery as well)", "121" ], [ "A AIO/CLC will not give you an advantage in the summer, it'll be the same as any other high end air cooler, so you can easily go that route as well if you wanted and save some money. The liquid will be at ambient temps anyways, as will the air going through the radiator, so the delta T is the same regardless of air or water.\n\nIf you do plan on overclocking, a 240 rad is recommended, even if it's just a little overclock. I wouldn't worry about the differences between the AIOs too much, just make sure you read some reviews first.", "81" ], [ "Orientation doesn't matter very much and is dictated by the case you buy. It'll only go in one way, see case manual if you need further assistance there.\n\nTo pick a PSU, first don't cheap out. There are great value PSUs out there. There isn't a set brand that is ok to buy, it's completely up to the specific model of PSU, as every company puts out duds as well. _URL_1_ is a good place for reviews if you are not sure. You can also check [this tier list](_URL_0_) for a general idea", "144" ], [ "You can't overclock a 10400 on a B460 motherboard. You need a Z motherboard (like Z490) and a K CPU (like 10600**K**) in order to overclock.\n\n > My question is, what is the maximum i can overclock to? Moreover what's a safe overclock speed?\n\nYou need to research more on overclocking, this isn't anything we can feed you as the silicon lottery exists. We also all run different setups with different cooling solutions in different environments. \n\nStart with the wiki/tutorials over at /r/overclocking for more info.", "121" ], [ "> The big thing here is read/write speed. \n\nIt's actually access times and IO throughput. Sequential speeds are generally what is advertised, and makes very little difference to load times. This can be seen as NVMe barely provides any benefits over Sata SSD, despite being multiple times faster in read/write speeeds. Since SSD doesn't have moving parts like HDD, access times for any SSD will be minimal, hence why all SSDs will provide similar load times.", "448" ], [ "Push vs pull makes little to no difference. Go with whatever makes more sense to you, whether it's aesthetics or fitment. From testing, push might have the slight edge but it's certainly nothing to go out of your way for.\n\n > radiator in a PULL configuration and his temperatures went down about 8°C\n\nThis is the opposite of what most tests conclude, and 8C is significant enough that I'd certainly criticize his testing method, I'd guess something else here maybe be contributing to that significant of a difference. \n\nDon't overthink this, if you're truly this concerned about it, test it for yourself as that's the only way to know for sure. Basing it off of others' tests is pointless, you aren't running their system.", "722" ], [ "I was recently discussing with a friend who recently got into building PCs, and there are a lot of things that new builders find odd. This was one of them, so I'm not surprised.\n\nWe also discussed GPU compatibility with AGP, Pata/IDE cables, modems used to go in your PC, multimonitor support being near non-existent until more recently, cleaning mouse balls, and cold cathodes being the best way to light up a case.", "217" ], [ "The big issue is the ability to use larger coolers, since more surface area = more heat dissipation. \n\nBigger cases also utilize more fans, means more air can be moved with fans at slower speeds.\n\nAlso, your internal components have more access to air, same reason why removing your side panel to allow the components ample fresh air generally results in slightly lower temps. I don't think this is as much an issue as the 2 factors I listed above, assuming ample air flow is not an issue.", "81" ], [ "Despite him not understanding boost clocks, \"regularly OCs to 5GHz\" is not actually real. Binning statistics show only top 30% reaching 5 all core: _URL_0_\n\nOf the 2 I've tested, I would only daily drive 5 with one of them. I don't understand what workload you have that could get you this ragey about not hitting 5GHz, it's not like that's really doing anything noticeable outside of edge case productivity tasks with sustained workloads.", "121" ], [ "> Pure performance, <PERSON>, though the Auros is already a fantastic MB for OC.\n\nHow do you figure... motherboard doesn't effect performance and OC ability is almost entirely up to the silicon lottery. Having additional power phases does nothing for anyone short of LN2. Now before you link that tier chart, please noe the part that says *preliminary opinion* at the bottom, and the actual lack of numerical data.", "153" ], [ "I agree with that, but I'm not convinced you need a $200+ motherboard to reach peak OC and maintain stability. Not to mention, the greatest contribution to OC stability should be thermals before motherboard. I'm not convinced anyone running an air cooler with no delid is even going to come close to needing the additional power requirements. Hell, I'm running the Z370 Krait with a delid and full custom loop, and had I decided to get the ASUS Formula, my max OC would remain the same. I'm not getting any higher regardless of mobo. The point is, I'm running 1.39V to keep stable, I'm not going higher than that regardless of motherboard, and there's no motherboard that's going to drop that number down.", "81" ], [ "> I've not yet had reason to look at watercooling, other than how unique some builds look\n\nCustom loops have measurable performance gains over AIO and air. (Rigid tubing with white liquid, feel free to look in my post history). Custom loops are the best you can get short of active phase change or LN2.\n\n > Having said all that - It all depends on your case. A closed-off system, with minimal vents and access to air, you'll definately struggle with an aircooled system. Not to say watercooling doesn't require fresh air, but the effect is lessened.\n\nIt's not lessened, at all. That's not how thermal dynamics works. The whole point is, you have parts that create heat, and it creates the same amount of heat regardless of what cooler you stick on it. You want to get that heat away from the part, which in a case is outside. Watercooling is great for this as it has a very high specific heat, and can carry more heat away from the source, to the radiator. You still need to expel the heat though, which requires air just like with air coolers, only with water you can move the radiator around. The amount of cooling capacity comes down to the size of the radiator. That's why custom loops are better (also the parts are better but the main reason is the rads), because the largest air cooler isn't going to be able to match up with a 360+mm radiator, it's just not physically possible.", "722" ], [ "> does anyone know if they'll support the AM4 socket and current boards for gen 3?\n\nNo one can tell the future, but the general assumption is yes. AMD said they are going to support the AM4 socket through 2020, take that with a grain of salt. Intel, I doubt the 300 series will be supported past coffee lake, but we'll see.\n\nKeep in mind, for future proofing we can only guess based on trends and current hardware. Currently, more cores and threads are not as important as single core speeds (for gaming), but it's trending towards the prior (you can see comparisons between 8700K and 2700X). Regardless, if you buy a high end CPU, it will most likely be good for a solid 3-4 years, so buy whatever you want and worry about the future when it comes.", "153" ], [ "I love AMD, even for the pure fact they make Intel work that much harder. I try buying AMD whenever possible. \n\nYou may want to keep in mind, the AM4 socket may be the same but compatibility may not, which means you may only be able to use the same cooler. On Intel's side, this can be seen with the LGA1151, series 100, 200, and 300. All the same socket, not all compatible. AMD did also have this issue, just on a smaller scale. The 9370 and 9590 FX chips could only use a handful of AM3+ mobos (due to power limitations), and many AM4 mobos required a BIOS update to run gen 2 (which often required gen 1 CPU to update). But again, all speculation. Personally, I always plan to change mobo when I change CPU, as mobos generally aren't they much (they can be, but $100-150 mobos are more than what 99% of users need).", "81" ], [ "> Would my Corsair H100i v2 be good enough to cool the 8700K?\n\nThe \"runs pretty hot\" is over exaggerated. You don't need any special to keep it under wraps. It runs hot because people throw large amounts of voltage at it trying to OC and get stability. Under normal conditions, it's maybe a tad hotter than the rest.\n\n > I currently have an ASUS z270e motherboard and I like the design of of ASUS motherboards. I am planning on getting the z370e. Is there a better ASUS board for around the same price(~$20 difference)?\n\nBetter is objective, it's about what you want or need. The Z370-A and Z370-F are both around the same price. Most people settle for the A version because it's cheaper, and performance is same across the board.\n\n > I am also planning on getting a new case. I have heard the the Phanteks Enthoo EVOLV is a great case, but is weaker on the cooling side. The CPU will be water cooled, but would my GPU, Strix 1070, be effected in a noticeable way?\n\nAgain, over exaggerated. The difference is a few degrees C with proper air flow. This means nothing for performance or longevity. It's extremely rare that a case lacks air flow to the point that's it's detrimental to performance (looking at you mITX). Get whatever case you want.\n\n > I am sure that this will be a yes, but does the Enthoo EVOLV have enough space for 2 3.5’ HDDs and a Samsung EVO SSD?\n\nYes", "81" ], [ "I'm not arguing the worth it point at all, I'm just saying many people are incorrectly under the assumption they need to spend $200+ to reach the magical 5.0 or that they can squeeze out an extra 300mhz from the mobo itself. The value criteria is clearly opinion and personal preference, but to me it's like people buying NVME drives to put their games on, there are better values without a doubt and gains are minimal at best. I was addressing <PERSON>'s post directly, and again I'm not trying to deter him from getting the motherboard he wants, but there are surely better values available for him with minimal to no negative effects.", "217" ], [ "I agree with that, I hope you don't think I'm trying to be a toxic troll or anything, I'm just trying to offer better value for what he wants. There's a lot of misinformation out there and people taking information out of context, like that tier chart that everyone keeps posting. It's a person's opinion should be used as such (stated at the bottom of the chart), and really only applies to a single chip going for the highest OC that specific chip can obtain.", "85" ], [ "Yes but much of it is overkill. We can all agree quality VRMs with jap caps are good to have, but more power phases is a bit overkill. 10 is enough for 99% of users overclocking, you just don't need more for daily driving. That tier chart you posted is also someone's opinion, it's not a factual guide to what's the best Z370 board. Not only that, it only applies to the 8700K being pushed to the absolute limit, most people back it off for gaming as 100mhz isn't going to drop their framerate a noticeable amount, that's why I'm arguing the 100mhz point. I'm not saying the Taichi isn't worth it or you shouldn't get it, it's just not necessary for most people.", "757" ], [ "Coil whine does not come through headphone jacks, that's just not possible. Coil whine occurs from the coil physically vibrating, it's something you will directly hear come from the GPU itself.\n\nWhat you are most likely experiencing is some sort of electromagnetic interference. This generally occurs when you have something magnetic near either the jack or the onboard sound. To remedy this, people often buy a $7 usb adapter from Amazon, just search Sabrent.", "329" ], [ "This could very well be it. I play with my phone on my desk and people can often hear the interference in my mic when someone calls, it's creepy because they'll say something before it ever rings.\n\nYour wireless charger is, in my best guess, the source of the issue. It is in fact made of coils and utilizes electromagnetic fields. I am curious to see if this is the cause of the issue.", "658" ], [ "Keep in mind that tier chart is an *opinion*, it states it right there at the bottom. It's also meant as a tool for people overclocking and maintaining their 8700K at the furthest it can possibly go. You shouldn't be using that chart as a \"ranking\" for what motherboard to get. For one, 99% of overclockers are daily driving at the max, that's just silly. Also, it only ranks based on risk assessment of the VRMs, which if you don't know what that means you probably shouldn't take the chart too seriously.", "121" ], [ "Get a Z370 board with an 8700K, no reason not to\n\n3000-3200mhz ram would serve you much better\n\nThe problem is, or what it seems like, is you went all out on the CPU because you want to stream. However, you cheaped out on the parts surrounding it. This isn't the way to go, and you're doing yourself no favors. You will find a similar if not better experience with the new 2700X from Ryzen. It will perform marginally close for gaming, all while providing extra cores to help stream. My advice for mobo and RAM apply for that CPU as well.", "592" ], [ "This is a pretty standard 8700K/1080Ti build. Only thing I would suggest is getting a cheaper cooler, as that performs no better than an air cooler less than half it's price. \n\nI would also recommend getting a standard SSD as well. The NVME you can use for boot or scratch disk, as improvements will be noticeable there, but for gaming it's going to be an expensive way of not getting any benefits.", "592" ], [ "I would still recommend against it, but many of the financing companies most likely require credit history. There are some intended for bad or building credit, but generally they are for necessities like furniture, cars, etc... I think Best Buy even has one for that. You can also look into credit building credit cards. All of these options will have **high interest**, and will absolutely set you back years if you start missing payments. Again, I do not recommend this, this is a terrible idea, but if you are *absolutely certain* that you can be responsible, this is always a route that you can take. If you can, maybe find one that has zero interest introductory period.\n\nOne last piece of advice, **DO NOT** overspend or buy above your financial capabilities. It's better to get something cheaper than you think you need, as you can always upgrade when money isn't as tight. A shitty computer plays porn just as well as any monster out there.", "537" ], [ "The problem is with the \"affordability\" factor of AIOs as well as radiator sizes. You bare min custom loop costs $200, so to get that down you are looking at cheaping out on parts and mass production to loose specs. Aluminum rads are not nearly as effective as copper rads, not to mention surface area of rads on custom loops is enormous, while AIOs are limited (granted the 360 ones are getting pretty darn big). They also probably use fluid with lots of preservatives, which may or may not drop the specific heat of the fluid.", "81" ], [ "AMD is great right now because they are making fantastic all around CPUs at a really affordable price point. They are decent gaming chips that offer lots of cores/threads. Where they fall behind is for people building pure gaming builds, as Intel remains king in gaming, while still providing enough cores (up 2 cores from last gen on i5's and i7's) to do exceptionally well in productivity and streaming.\n\nBasically, they both offer great CPUs at every level. AMD is preferred for production due to high core counts and is generally cheaper. Intel is preferred for gaming PCs due to high single core speeds, but can still offer good performance in other applications. Intel still seems to have the edge, but I believe the overall experience for either side has been overwhelmingly positive as competition is pushing both companies in a very consumer friendly direction.", "153" ], [ "Why Intel only? You're doing yourself a bit of a disservice by limiting your options, especially since you are giving a modest budget.\n\nWith that said, it seems single core speeds are a bit more relevant in audio than video since things happen more in series than parallel. 8700 might be the way to go for this. Another option would be the 7820X, which I've never actaully recommended but it may work for you, as long as you don't mind not having a budget for a GPU.\n\nIf you were to consider AMD, the new 2700X would probably fair very well for you and you could utilize the extra cores/threads, all at a more reasonable price than the 7820X", "592" ], [ "> So I understand that various cards have different voltage limits\n\nThis is incorrect, all Pascal cards are limited to 1.093V. \n\n > so what card should I buy to get the highest overclock when water cooling.\n\nAgain, with Pascal it's not going to make much difference as voltage is capped. Not only that, boost clock is calculated by the card, so it's not like you can tell it to go faster than it wants to. To increase boost clock, you have to increase thermal headspace, which you can absolutely do by going custom loop, but don't expect a huge jump. I'd say 50mhz extra is a pretty significant increase from stock boost clock.", "121" ], [ "That article is a bit outdated and referring to first gen Ryzens. \n\n > The next generation of Zen chips is already on the horizon and we have to keep in mind that the current one is the first generation to leverage this technology, so the is still plenty of possibilities here that the gap will be closed even further as the sub-system is improved upon and fully optimized over the coming years.", "85" ], [ "Neither, bottlenecking is inevitable, and is different per game. This is not anything you should worry about as it is unavoidable. The pairing is fine, just stop worrying about bottlenecking, it's the industry's stupid way of getting people to keep upgrading their hardware and spending money. 99% of the time, your GPU is going to be the bottleneck anyways, regardless of what CPU you get.", "153" ], [ "I'm not trying to be rude, but SLI is absolutely crap. There is literally no support for it anymore and no optimization for it for any new games. It's very clear the industry is ditching this technology, and widely accepted as such moving forward. I would even go as far as to say you would experience negative impacts on new games, due to microstutter, power consumption, and possibly even negative scaling. It should not be considered an option for anyone except for professional benchmarkers.", "896" ], [ "You've got the thermal headspace, I'm assuming you have a half decent cooler, so my best guess is you can probably rock it up to 1.35V, but I wouldn't go over that for now.\n\nAlso, Cinebench isn't the greatest for finding max temps, as it only runs for like a min. To find max temp, generally you want to leave a test open for hours.\n\nI would start with OC'ing individual cores, since you have a baseline @ 4.9. Knock it up 100mhz on single core, then two, then three, etc using same voltage and see if it will stay stable. When it becomes unstable, go up on the voltage by .01V at a time. Don't go over 1.35V, and try to stay around 85C max, 90C would be where I would call it quits.", "121" ], [ "3 weeks sounds about right, only EVGA and Sapphire have surprised me with how speedy they are. Most recently, MSI took 4 weeks and sent me back a different refurbed card (which is an issue because I custom loop and PCB design was different), they contacted me exactly 0 times and the card randomly showed up.\n\nSame goes for Asus and Gigabyte. Asus mobo RMA's are sometimes so bad they take 3 weeks and send you back the exact same mobo without even touching it.", "816" ], [ "The sub you are looking for is r/buildapcforme\n\n > because trying to understand Hz and refresh rates\n\nHz is the measure for refresh rate, it's frequency (# of times per second). So a 60hz monitor will refresh the image displayed 60 times per second. This is similar to FPS, which is how many frames your PC outputs per second. The idea is to match the PC to your intended resolution and refresh rate.", "989" ], [ "> could someone explain why I might want to buy an extra paste instead of the stock paste?\n\nIf you are trying to lower temperatures for additional overhead (usually people trying to increase a thermally limited OC), then a few degrees here and there can add up. For most, it's not worth it, especially if you aren't running a high end cooling system.\n\nThermal Grizzly is also the company, they produce Hydronaut, Kryonaut, Conductonaut, etc.... They pretty much have a paste for every budget.\n\nI wouldn't recommend getting TG Kryonaut if you're running a 212, you won't notice any difference. However, I do recommend picking up extra thermal paste just in case, a $5 tube of MX-4 will perform just fine.", "81" ], [ "Yup, that's exactly why I removed mine from my desk. \n\nIMO, it's usable if you use a TKL keyboard, frees up a bunch of space.\n\nI lift my mouse quite often, so depth was a big deal for me. My knuckles would always hit the underside of my desk. I ended up getting a low profile TKL keyboard, and a small mouse because it couldn't comfortably use a MX Master.\n\nIf it was wider, and had more depth, that would be key IMO to a much better experience.", "144" ], [ "2080Super, you are asking about resolutions/refreshes that current hardware can still struggle at, you want the best card you can afford.\n\n > Once available, I would prefer a hybrid/AIO water cooled card.\n\nSave your money, there isn't much point. Maybe if you compared to a blower card, it would be considered quieter but performance wise all modern cards are power limited so it's rather pointless.", "757" ], [ "The pin board on AMD sockets shift and lock the CPU by compressing them, it's just friction. Not like Intel where the bracket physically holds it down and it's impossible to remove the CPU.\n\nIt's not super difficult to remove an AMD CPU even with the lever lock by simply pulling the CPU out. You likely won't even damage anything unless you bend the pins.", "85" ], [ "Cooler and CPU TDP's don't mean a whole lot and don't compare directly, it's a rough guideline at best. If you put a 100W TDP cooler on a 95W TDP CPU, you'd have issues. Not only that, Intel TDP's are based on base clocks and AMD TDP's are based on boost clocks.\n\nThe limiting factor here is the architecture as it's just a refresh. They push the chips further by increasing power and clocks.", "121" ], [ "You sure are making a lot of decisions on information you clearly haven't looked into.\n\nIf you have a Ryzen CPU, forget that delidding even exists.\n\n > i heared it makes a 20⁰C diffrence\n\nYou must not have heard the rest of the sentence as that statement usually is followed by \"for Intel CPU's running previous gen TIM rather than solder\".\n\nEDIT: Please look at his history before choosing to engage", "85" ], [ "1. Maybe. Do you have a 3000 series Ryzen?\n\n2. Positive pressure, not airflow. You can create positive pressure by adjusting fan curves, it's impossible to say what pressure you have, as we don't know what fans you are running and what curves they are on.\n\n3. BeQuiet and Noctua are, IMO, industry leading for fan noise (as in they are the best).\n\n4. Not sure, it may be using DC voltage regulation rather than PWM but I have no experience with that controller.", "81" ], [ "In case you weren't aware, advertised sequential speeds dont' really matter if your use case is gaming and booting OS. NVMe vs Sata barely makes any difference. Spending significantly more on an expensive Samsung drive is very low value, you're paying for no real benefit. If NVMe vs Sata makes so little difference, then difference in NVMe's becomes more trivial.", "448" ], [ "> The whole situation around pc parts this year has been absolutely ridiculous.\n\n<PERSON>.... This isn't exactly a typical year.\n\nI mean, do you intend on ripping on every release? Are all tech companys bad too? Sony too? Microsoft? Console releases are generally all difficult to get at launch. I remember camping out for the PS2 and not getting one. What about the PS5? Xbox Series X?\n\nWhat about Intel's 8th gen launch? Did we forget about that one? \n\nWhat about the mining crisis 2 years ago? What about the one in 2013 that saw people paying $500+ for a R9 290 which was quite difficult to get a one?\n\nIt's literally launch day. Let's pull this back a bit.", "933" ], [ "I'm gonna guess you set your graphics settings to low.\n\nTurn them up if you want your GPU to be the bottleneck instead.\n\nThis isn't an actual issue and it's a self inflicted CPU bottleneck if so.\n\nOverclocking isn't going to change your performance by any noticeable amount.\n\nIt sounds like you're trying to fix an issue that doesn't actually exist due to a misconception that bottlenecks are bad.", "121" ] ]
235
[ 15702, 4185, 7823, 3189, 20691, 5586, 2535, 924, 1096, 22270, 20328, 7208, 3494, 10509, 19483, 10719, 9138, 21598, 12885, 4830, 3342, 13540, 15045, 18251, 4989, 1235, 3228, 7632, 8440, 23324, 9768, 16269, 17835, 23613, 18521, 18152, 19480, 7611, 11914, 6827, 2383, 11842, 13981, 18656, 25071, 2421, 16552, 24571, 21499, 5236, 12120, 17239, 25477, 12614, 13301, 24342, 13526, 6673, 11709, 24813, 12914, 12100, 4508, 15800, 7274, 16185, 14928, 16050, 11868, 8846, 23353, 11594, 12929, 2238, 4938, 9611, 5666, 2615, 10345, 4015, 24698, 671, 549, 4866, 8561, 15712, 24152, 24467, 8971, 9497, 13201, 20662, 14143, 18176, 8090, 23460, 19602, 1761, 20967, 11104, 24265, 14232, 329, 24509, 6815, 25438, 18370, 7910, 19146, 20821, 13865, 21287, 654, 7879, 12210, 17296, 1711, 9082, 1651, 1562, 15244, 3703, 21100, 4437, 8093, 14194, 24697, 11259, 8021, 18239, 17894, 4395, 129, 16917, 22316, 21993, 15162, 16335, 11986, 8523, 21838, 16641, 2325, 13982, 307, 22783, 18719, 21360, 4817, 24979, 7171, 18481, 20917, 8086, 24197, 17536, 8599, 3235, 8839, 18732, 25133, 14482, 12967, 20582, 20009, 17529, 3316, 2939, 25190, 13650, 19453, 11309, 7876, 8748, 4952, 21525, 9316, 22953, 12817, 4636, 24406, 24528, 20453, 22069, 4504, 24745, 25440, 9920, 23092, 18253, 13457, 16912, 2496, 5286, 14913, 22420, 17723, 845, 19894, 3622, 6296, 24741, 18512, 14651, 3918, 2738, 15556, 17503, 12395, 11257, 18283, 15960, 19861, 10333, 4375, 8010, 20862, 23300, 15331, 1661, 5006, 975, 1059, 17501, 779, 24174, 1636, 12531, 5108, 10470, 4972, 9084, 22689, 8136, 3465, 197, 6466, 21248, 5552, 5002, 15646, 4387, 24392, 3314, 9528, 707, 13302, 8816, 23311, 23449, 9075, 12272, 20433, 215, 2231, 25290, 17707, 2004, 19871, 7347, 11012, 16608, 3292, 23078, 11507, 25235, 6848, 20035, 23086, 3484, 18051, 384, 13287, 3766, 17406, 8245, 1258, 15021, 17594, 23672, 14383, 5093, 4599, 1665, 16831, 3512, 14398, 21450, 10981, 19855, 8789, 23337, 23774, 21402, 6745, 21452, 15028, 21831, 8502, 6275, 19906, 22079, 14893, 1275, 15387, 13279, 4674, 19949, 14378, 12515, 22225, 10670, 14722, 12626, 18217, 14535, 13005, 15549, 10047, 2877, 17998, 10359, 5343, 15553, 12677, 18274, 5, 10975, 1968, 8591, 9929, 17899, 19467, 11440, 10428, 19756, 5422, 15255, 6961, 14019, 18887, 3520, 15031, 5791, 19255, 2070, 3118, 19106, 11679, 5123, 4002, 12736, 13082, 11461, 19421, 5839, 14703, 14887, 4017, 23029, 23155, 12707, 25272, 9205, 19935, 8960, 3611, 11496, 4485, 1667, 1641, 9067, 24442, 8876, 4500, 8304, 3398, 13433, 15065, 20461, 21639, 15863, 5648, 18140, 19512, 3117, 12095, 10812, 9389, 831, 20636, 7418, 4043, 7246, 24074, 17784, 18459, 23898, 13218, 10793, 13732, 1950, 16967, 140, 17488, 12903, 12019, 9236, 18090, 15683, 3459, 16736, 3097, 10905, 3727, 7769, 7257, 16749, 25025, 14510, 12621, 21175, 24111, 3468, 21512, 20567, 17001, 25514, 11468, 10602, 14154, 21745, 13110, 1195, 2400, 13867, 9585, 24313, 14219, 3094, 9537, 3040, 24332, 1230, 9252, 14164, 8008, 18331, 8628, 22850, 16723, 7964, 23537, 11866, 1407, 13701, 2251, 23089, 4711, 12586, 17571, 3216, 5512, 10119, 12805, 22214, 7016, 1248, 17925, 8658, 24845, 1818, 14045, 19606, 4546, 13464, 13271, 18898, 12842, 16413, 13780, 963, 3102, 8744, 7236, 13014, 20789, 16403, 12942, 11452, 25192, 6574, 3493, 1207, 8796, 3460, 17079, 21937, 2937 ]
reddit_dump_-VismundCygnus-
[ [ "Are you really confused or are you just trying to be argumentative? It's not a rare thing to be very excited for a movie, but ultimately let down. It's even worse when it's not offensively bad, so you still have hope or still wish you *could* like it because you *want* to.\n\nSo no, it's completely ridiculous to say \"you either like a movie or you don't.\" It's as if you're unaware of the existence of context or nuance or opinion.\n\nIt really says more about you than OP that you jumped from 'wishing you liked a movie more' to the completely different concept of 'wanting to fit in with the crowd's opinion.'", "869" ], [ "That's great.\n\nYou can enjoy art however you want. It's *super weird* if you watch a movie one time and then immediately decide your opinion on it, never to change it, but hey whatever you can do what you like. I could even argue that that's an incorrect way to experience art, but again, you can live your life however you want.\n\nRegardless, the majority of people aren't like you. You can think whatever you want about films, I'm just telling you that it's completely ridiculous to say that people aren't allowed to wish they liked something more or learn more about movies in order to gain a further appreciation of it. I'm just telling you that your statement of \"you either like a movie or you don't\" is objectively incorrect, because that's simply not how opinions or enjoyment of art works.", "889" ], [ "> Why did <PERSON> buy 60,000 worth of \"hotdogs\"? \n\nlol, uh maybe a party? \n\n > Why does <PERSON> & <PERSON> match the time schedule for alledged child kidnapping in spain, and the Spanish police have matching sketches to? \n\nThey don't. Also those police sketches were both of one person. Not two.\n\n > Why are all of these pizzerias held within confidence?\n\nThis doesn't even make any sense?\n > Why did the CC TV traffic camera MOVE TOWARDS THE POLE the night before the \"armed investigator\" came to comet pizza? \n\n[](_URL_0_) \n > Why did it move back towards the intersection after the Reddit thread got traffic later that day?\n\nAre you trying to imply that the shooter was a false flag? If he was a false flag, what do the cameras have to do with anything? He would have walked up to the building the same way whether he was an actor or not.\n\nBut this is silly. You, like all Pizzagaters, already have your mind made up. You're not looking at evidence, you're forming a conclusion and then hastily and desperately trying to build up evidence to support your hypothesis. Like the rest of us have already said, it's completely insane. You are a completely insane, idiot child. That's really all there is to it.", "741" ], [ "It's really silly to try to compartmentalize \"politics\" as something that is its own unique, distinct topic that should only be discussed at certain times or in certain venues. It's an absurd way to look at the world. Politics isn't some random topic of conversation like sports or film. It's a massively important part of life that affects the lives of everybody on the planet more than any other concept. There's almost nothing you can do that isn't touched by 'politics'.\n\nAnd there's no better time than now to have it be the forefront of our society - when it's incredibly divisive and an outrageously pressing matter. There is a new government coming into power that is already changing the way everything has always operated for decades. There are going to be incredible effects on everybody on earth, and almost all of them are sure to be overwhelmingly negative.\n\nSo no, this isn't something that should be kept out of conversation. *Especially* in a subreddit based around an artistic television show that is known for its social commentary.", "647" ], [ "Of course there's a difference, but that doesn't mean either one is any more valid. In OP the original picture involved a smarmy, slimy salesman printing an ad that was purposely disingenuous and misleading. The image was altered to show <PERSON>, a smarmy, slimy salesman who advertised a purposely disingenuous and misleading message. It's funny, it's relevant to the readers of this subreddit, and it's relevant to the Simpsons. There's no issue. If the image was edited to make a point about sports or microwaves or sea-turtles, i.e. a completely random and irrelevant topic, the criticism would be fair. I'm saying that political discussion is never irrelevant.", "339" ], [ "It helps pay for reddit's server cost and it has many [additional benefits and extra settings](_URL_0_) for using the site. It was actually the first result when googling \"reddit gold.\" People like to be snarky and bitch about how 'useless' it is, but it's really quite useful. The fact alone that it syncs your 'read' submissions across platforms (e.g. desktop and Android apps) is worth the price in my opinion. Amazing setting.", "945" ], [ "Turning off ads is great, because it actually supports reddit unlike using an adblocker. Comment highlighting is amazing. Remembering which submissions you've read across platforms is a ridiculously useful feature which is, like I said, worth the price of admission alone. And there's still a bunch more assorted little things.\n\nIt costs $4/$2.50 a month and it's *main* purpose is to help support reddit. Honestly if your reaction to these features for that price is \"meh\" it's clear you just wouldn't be pleased by any reasonable features offered. Reddit Gold isn't the problem, your expectations are the problem.", "945" ], [ "> You can block adds with ABP \n\nI guess if you want to be a jerk and deprive reddit of revenue while they already have some of the least intrusive, least obnoxious ads of any top 20 website. \n\n > you can just remember the links you've visited\n\nYes, it's simple to remember hundreds of links every day. That's absurd, you could brush off the utility of any neat feature with this logic. Yeah, you could just \"do X\" instead of using any tool on any website. But, you know, it's kinda neat not to have to.\n\n > how many times do you really need to sort by 500+ comments or threads. Kind of useless.\n\nYeah, it's pretty clear you're just ridiculously entitled and have completely unreasonable expectations. The Reddit Gold benefits are absolutely acceptable. They're several quite handy additional tools added on top of the *main* reason for reddit gold, which is to *support reddit.*", "945" ], [ "> We have a long standing tradition of at least half the population hating the current administration\n\nThat's *reeeeeaaally* underselling the current situation. This isn't a normal left vs. right situation, despite how desperately <PERSON>'s followers try to frame it as such. People don't *absolutely despise* <PERSON> because he's a Republican, they despise him because he's an absolutely despicable person. It's not lefty snowflake cupcake crybabies unhappy with \"losing.\" Hating <PERSON> is not remotely exclusive to those on the left in any regard. It transcends politics - even the most low-down and dirty politics historically - on so many levels.\n\nIf this were normal 'left v right' politics, things would be a lot different. But now we have an absolutely immovable **cult** of followers vs. the *rest of the world.* Historically, people generally follow party lines. If a politician does something out of party lines, their support wavers. But that's not what this is. <PERSON> *is* seriously an Emperor-king to these people. Their beliefs are <PERSON>'s beliefs. As He changes His view, His followers react accordingly. It doesn't matter who you are, if you can be perceived as criticizing Him or, god forbid, He speaks negatively about you, well... you are then **the enemy.** It doesn't matter if they *loved* you the day before.\n\nSo it's incredibly disingenuous to try to sell this as being similar to something like the left's reaction to <PERSON> or the right's reaction to <PERSON>.\n\nThis is quite a unique situation we find ourselves in.\n\n---\n\nEDIT: Thanks for the gold. I'll go throw an extra $5 at Planned Parenthood in return.", "249" ], [ "> The cult of personality around <PERSON> is no worse than it was with <PERSON>. <PERSON> still unironically champions a \"scandal free administration\" which is happily eaten up by his remaining supporters.\n\nThere's no way you can honestly believe that. You don't have to look very far to find somebody who used to be a huge <PERSON> fan but has since been disappointed and let down by his administration. It's a pretty common theme. He was a bit of a mythical figure towards the beginning, but it didn't last very long. And even at its height, it was *nowhere* near the level of the unwavering, religion-like support of <PERSON>'s followers.\n\nThere's not really any ambiguity about whether or not <PERSON> has stirred up a cult of personality that hasn't been matched by any American politician in recent history.\n\n > The reality is that the GOP barely has a majority in the Senate, and there's at least four to six Republican senators who are prepared to fight <PERSON> on anything from his cabinet picks to any possible civil rights issues. <PERSON> is loud, brash and unapologetic, but unless he actually uses nuclear weapons (pro-tip: he won't) then the United States as a country will be fine long term.\n\nGo ask a <PERSON> follower what they think of those GOP Senators who aren't kissing <PERSON>'s feet. They'll tell you that they're just as bad as the leftist snowflakes. They're the enemy. Because you're either with <PERSON> or you're against him.", "800" ], [ "> I realize you are not american but our gov't has a system of checks and balances. The jist of it is. Nothing crazy is going to go on with america. the president does not have as much power as you think he does or reddit does for that matter.\n\nThe US system of checks and balances is only so good as the people in charge of implementing and enforcing the rules. And nobody is concerned about the concept of a '<PERSON> presidency' in a vacuum. They're concerned about the concept of a <PERSON> presidency in symbiosis with a GOP controlled Congress and a GOP controlled Supreme Court.\n\nCombine this situation with the fact that <PERSON> is already exhibiting an *unpresidented* level of lack of decorum and lack of regard for the rules. Combine all those things with the fact that the GOP's stated declaration is to completely gut the entire federal government, destroy every social safety net, roll back anti-discrimination regulation, pretend climate change doesn't exist so they can suffocate the planet, isolate from the world while imploding our international diplomacy efforts of the last 70 years, and basically erase every reason the United States has been held in high regard as a first world country, and well... Anybody paying attention can see why this might be a problem. More specifically, anybody paying attention can see why this is noteworthy and explicitly not the *normal state of affairs.*\n\nThe fact that <PERSON> is a nauseatingly stupid, immature, reactionary, petulant child who is likely either actively or passively beholden to one or more hostile foreign governments is just the cherry on top.\n\n > You guys know whats going to happen with a <PERSON> presidency....Hold your breath its a doozy......NOTHING. NOT A GOD DAMN FUCKIN THING. Life in america will continue to go as it always has no matter who is president. We will all go to work tomorrow.\n\nSo you're really very naive if you believe this. Maybe you've been paying attention, but it's not even inauguration day for two weeks and the GOP is already beginning their efforts to dismantle the ACA and defund Planned Parenthood. Medicare and Social Security will be next. These specific actions may not affect *you* yet, but I assure you that eventually they will. In the meantime, the rest of us are adults who don't have the luxury of being able to put our fingers in our ears and pretend like everything is still all just hunky dory.\n\nThe fact that people still exist who parrot the \"there's nothing different about this, you're all being over-dramatic\" spiel astounds me. It shows that you are incredibly unobservant and ignorant of how the world operates, but you still want to pretend like you have something useful to say, so you try to put on the cynical middle-school \"ehhh they're all the same!\" act. It really shows everybody the level at which you operate and accordingly the level at which should be taken seriously, and it's not a high one.", "725" ], [ "I'm well aware what MAD is. That has nothing to do with what we're talking about. Russia isn't the only country in the world. Nobody in this conversation is talking about Russia or nuking them, you just brought it up out of nowhere.\n\nThere are 8 countries with nuclear weapons. There are about 188 countries without them. So if <PERSON> were to use nuclear weapons on almost any one of those 188 countries, the world would probably not end. Like that one time the United States used nuclear weapons and the world didn't end. It's not like Russia would fire nukes at the United States if <PERSON> decided to nuke whatever random country annoyed him on Twitter.\n\nIn the event that <PERSON> *did* use the bomb, there would obviously be communication with the rest of the nuclear powers to give them a little heads-up that we're not attacking them. The US wouldn't just fire off a nuke without informing anybody.\n\nSo, once again, the point stands that using a nuke doesn't automatically equate to worldwide nuclear annihilation. Maybe if we were attacking Russia or another nuclear power, but that's orders of magnitude less likely than using a nuke in general.\n\nSo that's where /u/Choppin_Brokkoli has flawed logic in implying that <PERSON> wouldn't use nukes because he cares about his family - the false implication that using nukes in any context would immediately result in complete nuclear war.", "853" ], [ "Conversation isn't exactly a subjective art form in which any random response is equally valid.\n\nMy post had a pretty clear point, in the context of a pretty clear conversation. Responding with \"<PERSON> was just as bad!\" is wholly irrelevant.\n\nAnd honestly, if you're still sticking with that line at this point, it's embarrassing. If you think <PERSON> and <PERSON> were even on the same playing field of incompetence, corruption, inexperience, maturity, or stupidity then you're really just dumb. There's really no excuse for being that level of misinformed at this point.", "248" ], [ "> No it wouldn't be out of spite. They would quickly nuke us to protect themselves regardless.\n\nIt's pretty ridiculous to think that Russia would just go crazy and launch their nukes at the United States if <PERSON> decided to nuke some random, unrelated country. They would have literally nothing to gain from starting *certain* global nuclear war.\n\n > You have to be an idiot to think that <PERSON> is just going to \"launch a nuke as he pleases\". Pull your head out of your ass. Jesus fucking christ.\n\nI'm pretty sure I never said that <PERSON> is going to \"just launch a nuke as he pleases.\" You seemed to not be able to read.\n\nI said that's it's flawed logic to assume that the US using a nuke would absolutely result in global nuclear annihilation. It wouldn't, unless <PERSON> attacked another nuclear power.", "853" ], [ "> And no, its not irrelevant. This sub is so heavily biased towards her that the majority doesn't want to hear it though, so you need to make up excuses as to why it shouldn't be part of the conversation.\n\nYou're right. I guess I forgot that /r/television was a notorious <PERSON> subreddit. Silly me.\n\nI'll let you in on a little secret though. The election was over two months ago. <PERSON> won. So now for the next 4 years, when people are discussing <PERSON>, it's pretty *irrelevant* to insert <PERSON> into the conversation for no reason.", "557" ], [ "You're missing the point and projecting again. Let me try to spell it out for you:\n\nMe saying: \n\n > **<PERSON> using a nuke wouldn't necessarily immediately result in total nuclear war**\n\nis actually not the same thing as me saying:\n\n > **I think <PERSON> is going to use nukes**\n\nSeems pretty simple to follow honestly. But I forget, nuance and context aren't big things on this website.", "809" ], [ "> You guys are fucking ridiculous. Could it be that a lot of people didn't like either candidate? That they're tired of the bullshit a lot of politicians constantly spew? Could it be people didn't like <PERSON>? No that's not it, it must be a cult!\n\nHey man, <PERSON> lost. You gotta stop bringing her up eventually. *Especially* if you're trying to use her as an excuse for the concentrated intensity of <PERSON>'s following because, well, <PERSON> is done and yet... <PERSON>'s cult of personality is still in full swing. It's almost as if <PERSON> being a crappy candidate has nothing to do with <PERSON>'s cult of personality. Weird.\n\n > You're taking shitposting way too seriously. Were you also one of the people saying <PERSON> was a hate symbol too?\n\nShitposting? What does that have to do with anything? Do you think I'm basing this off of /r/The_Donald...? No, I'm basing it off of the undying support and blind, rabid fanaticism no matter what <PERSON> does.\n\nHe could contradict himself ten times in a day and his followers will make excuses. He could enact free college, socialized health care, and open immigration and his followers will applaud and claim it was his plan all along. He could *shoot somebody in the middle of 5th Avenue and he wouldn't lose any followers.* It's truly insane.", "249" ], [ "Does Brave's ad-blocking require root? Because if not, it's likely that they block ads in a similar way to many mobile browsers which tout this feature - by routing all of your web traffic through their servers, in order to strip the ads. Which means everything you do will be sent through a third party server, likely unencrypted. If this is the case regarding Brave, it would be worth mentioning in your post.\n\nEDIT: Seems I'm misinformed.", "358" ], [ "> \"Top story tonight, Redditor's opinions puts random people in harms way\"\n\nKinda like that time a maniac carried a rifle into a random pizza place filled with innocent bystanders and started firing shots. Because he thought the paranoid delusions of internet troglodytes was the real world.\n\n > You're right I should be careful and believe everything the news and government tells me.\n\nIt doesn't take the news or government to make one's brain work properly. Nobody who isn't some idiot child would ever believe this paranoid insanity. You believe that somebody is a pedophile because you disagree with them politically. As somebody who has repeatedly viewed all of the information you morons use to support your theory, there is no evidence. There is nothing other than political disagreement. It doesn't take a news report or government press conference to figure that out.", "969" ], [ "I mean, they should have called the cops if he was flying it illegally. If he wasn't, then they can get over it. Lots of people annoy me every day. But I'd be a huge insane asshole if I just destroyed people's belongings every time it happened.\n\nThis is so absurd to me, I'm getting downvoted a *ridiculous* amount for saying that it's not okay to destroy somebody else's expensive electronics because they're annoying you. I feel like it's backwards day. This seems like really simple stuff, grade-school morality choices.", "486" ], [ "I'd stay out of this conversation man.\n\nI've racked up around 150 downvotes between a few comments by saying that it's unreasonable to destroy somebody's property just because they're annoying you. I don't care about the downvotes, I just think it's absolutely fucking *insane* that apparently everybody is totally okay with this.\n\nLike, it's apparently not even controversial. Everybody here seems to think that's a totally moronic point of view and if somebody is annoying you, you have every right to do whatever you want to them - destroy their things, attack them, etc.", "837" ], [ "Saying thank you to somebody for doing you an immediate service or favor is different than saying \"thank you for your service\" without knowing anything a stranger has done. The situation you described is more akin to saying \"thank you\" to a cop for getting your cat out of a tree. You're thanking them for a specific action, not for the vague notion of simply 'being a bartender.'\n\nI worked directly with Marines for many years. Let me tell you, the vast majority of them are assholes. *Far* from heroes or anybody who should be thanked for anything. Most of these guys are sweeping hallways and cooking shitty eggs and impregnating and marrying girls they just met at the bar right outside base for the benefits, they're not jumping on grenades to save America from some grave threat.\n\nIt's incredibly silly and ridiculous to thank somebody for their service when you don't even know the person's name, let alone whether they happen to be a huge cunt or a mediocre boring cop or anything. It's weird. If somebody does something heroic, they should be commended but what we have in America is creepy unnecessary brainwashed boot-licking. Let's just reserve judgment until somebody actually does something worth being thanked for. Putting on a uniform isn't enough.", "920" ], [ "The thing is, there's nothing wrong with hating a group of people when an inherent part of the group they're in is something you think is despicable. I'm not speaking about Republicans specifically, but think of something like \"flat earthers.\" To be a flat earther, you inherently have to believe the earth is flat. So it's pretty fair to say that all flat earthers are idiots.\n\nWhen you extrapolate this out to something like 'voting for <PERSON>,' it would be easy to say that all <PERSON> supporters are idiots because at this point, there's really no way a non-idiot could be supportive of him. If the core belief of a movement is something only a complete idiot could get behind, it's fair to describe all of the movement's followers idiots.\n\nI don't think this applies to Democrats or Republicans though, because they're much more difficult groups to pin down. There is no one single core belief that either of them hold. It's fair to dismiss followers of a political personality if you think the person is despicable though.\n\nAnd speaking specifically to what <PERSON> has said, it's not exactly a new or novel idea to say \"You shouldn't call all Republicans morons.\" I think a lot of what <PERSON> says is interesting, but this is pretty lame, low-hanging fruit.", "856" ], [ "> how drastically the left overreacted to him\n\nI've seen very little overreaction to <PERSON>'s election. He's a slimy, immature, thin-skinned, corrupt con-man with the mental capacity of a 16 year old. It seems really fair to say that we've never had less qualified President in any manner whatsoever, not just referring to political experience.\n\nThe problem arises when people try to act like this is normal political bickering. Like this is a normal GOP President being elected and thus this is normal liberal outrage. It's not. There is nothing normal about this and there is no overreaction taking place. The reaction is pretty reasonable to the events taking place.", "614" ], [ "I found a few links.\n\n[ > <PERSON> says most pachinko parlors are still owned by Koreans living in Japan. And about 30 percent of those owners have ties to North Korea. He says at the peak of the industry in the nineties those owners were sending several hundred million dollars a year, in cash, to Pyongyang.](_URL_2_)\n\nand\n\n[ > <PERSON>, profiling the group last year on _URL_1_, wrote that in just the 1980s, \"Chongryon's business and criminal enterprises, which included off-book pachinko parlors, pubs, prostitution rings, and real estate, reportedly produced over a billion dollars a year in revenue.\"](_URL_3_)\n\n[Here](_URL_0_) is more information on these people known as 'Chongryon' aka 'General Association of Korean Residents in Japan.'", "959" ], [ "> More akin to you sitting next to me, me thanking the bartender, and you leaning over and saying, \"that's his job\".\n\nNo. It's actually *nothing* like that. Nobody thanked the cop in this thread for doing a specific act, like making a drink. That has nothing to do with anything. The cop was thanked for being a cop. You wouldn't thank a bartender walking down the street just for being a bartender. That would be weird and creepy.\n\n > But, its whatever, if you don't want to be appreciative of first responders or the military, that's your choice.\n\nThis sort of brainwashed bootlicking is the problem. Am I unappreciative of ice cream men because I don't say \"thank you for your service\" to every ice cream man I meet walking down the street? It's fucking weird man.", "141" ], [ "But that's another hard truth that people don't really want to hear. Even if war did break out, would it be necessary? Did the dudes who died fighting in Iraq or Afghanistan do it to, I dunno, \"protect America's freedoms?\" Does fighting for a non-noble cause deserve thanks? Not every conflict America gets involved with is a noble or necessary one. I can't imagine I'd be very thankful for somebody who fought in a war that makes no difference to me.\n\nI just wish this sort of critical thought on the matter was a bit more prevalent. The military worship is insane here. It's rare that an event in the news happens that doesn't get twisted to involve the military by my military friends. These guys who have never left the chow hall and think of themselves as heroes. *\"Oh <PERSON> won't stand for the pledge of allegiance, he's pissing on the grave of every military member who ever lived!\"* Like shut up man, this has nothing to do with you or the military.\n\nThis sort of brainwashing isn't helped by the majority of Americans involving themselves in the blind bootlicking worship.", "920" ], [ "> No, but when you spot me doing it and tell me that's his job, you do. Maybe I love ice cream, and hold ice cream truck drivers in the highest regard. Who are you to rain on my parade?\n\nI didn't tell you that's his job. I'm the person who replied to you to tell you that saying \"that's his job\" is not the same thing as telling police to \"go to hell.\"\n\n > This is just ridiculous. Appreciating someones efforts is not brainless bootlicking. Sounds like you have the impression that I love the police and would want to parade every officer around on my shoulders. Quite the contrary, the majority of my interaction with LEOs has not been positive for me, I don't get excited when I see a squad car get behind me on the highway. I do however recognize and appreciate the fact that if I get in an accident on that highway, that officer is going to be the first one there, and do try their damnedest to make sure I'm ok. That is why we thank people with those types of jobs. It's your choice to not be of that mindset, and that's fine. But when you start chastising others for it, that's when you become an asshole.\n\nOk. You may not be a mindless bootlicker, but that doesn't change the fact that a majority of Americans are. And it doesn't change the fact that it's a problem. Or that it's weird as shit.", "141" ] ]
45
[ 14087, 11831, 20038, 7136, 10002, 6402, 4708, 12926, 10237, 20628, 12413, 1948, 24247, 5610, 10469, 6361, 11038, 15915, 18871, 2545, 12776, 13179, 24942, 5146, 4362, 2970, 14791, 16034, 18301, 7466, 6459, 11412, 11984, 22515, 19433, 12941, 11972, 10014, 686, 639, 9264, 12990, 18859, 1478, 1560, 12913, 1202, 18689, 16030, 18974, 4464, 13094, 12410, 1278, 5572, 12650, 23533, 3967, 9439, 20364, 3721, 19918, 18770, 19410, 10328, 24983, 2053, 3279, 12034, 17070, 20899, 21070, 2832, 887, 3120, 16167, 16033, 19312, 18272, 10745, 5544, 4248, 13411, 3567, 2223, 768, 19259, 2403, 2918, 12503, 408, 16047, 6420, 24083, 11688, 7364, 1573, 16244, 4940, 8134, 25115, 19175, 11367, 6314, 21648, 9913, 11458, 20073, 19165, 21581, 4399, 16165, 3717, 8732, 18819, 24593, 14294, 25024, 1909, 8146, 21922, 16344, 7034, 7197, 12920, 25053, 22296, 22828, 7325, 1165, 10921, 9828, 10724, 17818, 19966, 14255, 21116, 12744, 5988, 21322, 7900, 13708, 2134, 12984, 9367, 21890, 1229, 1193, 10465, 18447, 19339, 23002, 17821, 6465, 16786, 22552, 12902, 7695, 6666, 22884, 3793, 10074, 11302, 8217, 92, 6510, 12783, 223, 16990, 24364, 15500, 5471, 22424, 7556, 14896, 6850, 20146, 7706, 4740, 24424, 8742, 20988, 21293, 21044, 20188, 7493, 7037, 12448, 8325, 12361, 3330, 13581, 1781, 6959, 22924, 23766, 3440, 8834, 17970, 16614, 22874, 8395, 24113, 2895, 449, 3804, 22334, 184, 19223, 24023, 16744, 14121, 367, 21625, 12043, 24834, 18562, 5979, 22757, 16628, 5847, 1580, 24085, 17053, 17950, 1254, 6188, 14519, 18477, 20858, 11348, 12894, 1079, 15983, 23053, 5782, 9370, 7051, 8980, 15853, 1953, 2916, 3786, 6710, 22733, 18887, 14226, 9373, 22161, 6936, 22886, 13073, 3090, 13777, 23293, 8674, 14111, 8909, 19945, 18681, 4887, 2251, 10661, 22318, 13608, 25064, 7033, 22688, 21719, 17498, 5765, 4208, 21751, 21099, 4102, 17739, 16182, 5804, 3009, 13070, 1406, 15133, 11498, 6359, 6262, 12146, 5434, 20526, 2230, 9287, 21147, 23353, 16378, 16607, 8856, 14685, 10370, 8044, 18035, 15006, 23164, 12955, 3259, 23826, 15688, 23895, 24072, 24263, 8865, 1616, 14214, 10959, 12907, 21989, 5142, 5162, 14786, 499, 15671, 25442, 22237, 16793, 1611, 11748, 1169, 13694, 21953, 1587, 21680, 13200, 822, 3409, 11522, 10609, 5238, 5450, 5333, 2516, 22059, 22006, 19131, 10955, 19631, 8773, 1103, 17217, 5532, 1757, 22392, 6495, 14177, 24139, 22964, 24948, 21400, 18914, 14598, 19639, 3286, 20834, 21959, 5588, 628, 13506, 13184, 4378, 23042, 13701, 11805, 275, 23124, 10907, 5713, 11978, 24484, 5371, 21834, 343, 12601, 22994, 10896, 5209, 3029, 10063, 5793, 10228, 18052, 14938, 19004, 15563, 14319, 7667, 18704, 21590, 8806, 14484, 23174, 24200, 17300, 21379, 12272, 21346, 16015, 4217, 696, 3428, 13011, 12599, 23785, 3352, 4779, 19763, 18844, 17406, 6751, 23820, 18807, 8351, 10683, 10502, 5962, 2329, 12591, 22242, 6596, 18654, 12376, 11930, 19095, 25521, 14819, 21246, 13600, 21120, 11194, 14020, 13882, 21083, 20609, 11065, 22626, 15158, 17689, 5561, 13913, 18400, 11463, 11580, 3648, 23900, 12072, 20668, 5711, 15916, 5708, 4474, 16387, 13908, 10996, 3854, 14535, 21742, 21213, 25048, 11822, 3056, 3588, 10916, 11391, 8624, 12872, 20043, 13082, 3568, 7284, 5054, 8204, 17236, 7923, 10658, 2373, 17697, 21459, 2092, 12355, 8558, 25159, 18740, 2188, 13767, 4507, 22830, 5319, 16115, 25404, 19656, 25317, 14522, 2559 ]
reddit_dump_-WhistleWhileYouLurk
[ [ "Earlier this evening, my wife and I were talking about how nice it had been to see NASA news all over the front page, instead of <PERSON>'s latest ass-hattery. \n\nSo that was a good twelve hours or so, where we could daydream about life on other planets, like we were all kids again. Now back to the business of being horrified adults, watching our senile alt-right grandpa shit himself at dinner and blame it on \"the gays.\"", "1012" ], [ "Fact is, it looked like a pretty even war if you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.\n\nThe North never had to get desperate, never remotely had to tap all its resources or even greater foreign aid. The South fought a truly desperate war of attrition, from the wrong side of it, and never had a humming bird's chance in a hurricane of achieving their goal.\n\nSince people are asking elsewhere in this thread, by the by, the absolute primary goal of the secessionists was to be left alone to keep slaves. Doesn't matter what your senile drunk grand-pappy told you, it was in their goddamn declaration of secession.\n\nFrom Georgia: \"The prohibition of slavery in the Territories is the cardinal principle of this organization.\"\n\nFrom Mississippi: \"Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization.\"\n\n[And the rest.](_URL_0_)", "180" ], [ "It's called [\"root girdling.\"](_URL_0_) The roots have grown in so tight around the tree, that they're going to choke it out and kill it.\n\nThe reason it looks like a solid piece is just because the roots have fused together, from growing so tight around the base of the tree.\n\nSource - Former parks & rec Maintenance I employee, have planted (and maintained) a couple hundred trees in my time working for a local suburb.\n\nEdit - TBH I'm shocked they've managed to keep this tree alive this far in to the process. I've never seen anything remotely like it. Any time root girdling is covered in a textbook, this should be one of the accompanying pictures.", "408" ], [ "To prevent it, the two biggest things are to make sure you don't plant the tree too deeply, and don't put mulch right up against the tree. Of course, that doesn't matter for the tree in OP's pic - it happened because of the tree growing up in the middle of all that cement.\n\nAs far as saving a girdled tree, the one in the pic is almost certainly beyond saving. There are a few things you can do in less severe cases: \n\nOne is making sure that plenty of the root flare is visible at ground level. If you can't see any of the roots flaring out from the base, you've likely got an issue. Clearing soil from the top of the roots a few feet around the tree will help. You can see this in action in the second closest tree in OP's pic. That tree was beginning to girdle itself, and someone has cleared out a lot of that soil. \n\nYou usually don't want to trim any roots yourself, unless you're a professional arborist. You're more likely to do harm than good. Just give the roots room to grow, and usually it'll work itself out.\n\nThe other thing to do is to remember to *never* pile mulch up around the base of the tree. Doing so traps a lot of moisture against the trunk, and ensures that the roots don't *have* to grow away from the base. It's a near certain way to cause girdling.\n\nYou want to make a mulch ring around your tree, but with a good patch of soil inside the ring between the mulch and the tree. You want 4 - 12 inches of clear space, depending on the size and type of tree. You should periodically rake it back away from the trunk (and hopefully off the first foot or so of the visible root flare), because it's going to settle in against the tree on its own.\n\nPutting down a good mulch ring can also help save a girdled tree. Once you've exposed the root flare like I mentioned, setting up the mulch ring traps moisture away from the base of the tree - encouraging the roots to grow outward.", "408" ], [ "Sure!\n\nThe big problem here is that the 'root disc' is going to continue swelling in size, whereas the rope in your example never gets any tighter. Sooner or later, that flare is going to choke the tree off completely - and I'm pretty certain that the flare can't be safely removed. If it isn't removed, it will definitely finish killing the tree.\n\nSecond, the roots have nowhere to go. There's obviously nowhere for them to go above the concrete, and if there was somewhere for them to go underneath the concrete then they would have done so in the first place. Either the concrete goes too deep, or the soil underneath it is too hard-packed. To even attempt to grow out new roots, you'd have to clear several feet of the concrete out in a radius around the tree. Probably need to till the soil, too.\n\nLastly, you can see a lot of signs of rot all over the tree. Even if you could clear out a bunch of concrete, encourage new root growth, *and* safely remove that flare, the tree is already pretty well on its way to dead. You can see the dark brown patches where the roots and tree are beginning to succumb to rot, and the lighter patches of bark where the bark has already died. Anything you do might already be too late.\n\nThat said, there are plenty of folks out there who know a lot more than me about a lot of things - so you never know.", "408" ], [ "No, not a bad idea at all. Plenty of trees have smaller root flares, roots that grow deeper, or are of a smaller species and don't require as much room to grow. Given the proper amount of space around the tree for root systems to develop, you're fine.\n\nWith OP's pic, the tree was improperly planted, poorly taken care of, or maybe even not intended to grow there in the first place. It may have started up in that crack, and somebody just did a poor job of clearing room for it to grow. An oak could probably survive in that spot, given the right care.\n\nEdit - I do see a lot of landscapers who plant trees improperly, or in places where they will eventually die, though. Thing is, you can plant a tree in the wrong place, care for it like shit, and it may still grow for *years*. So I can't guarantee that every tree you see in a median or sidewalk is going to survive there.", "408" ], [ "Which, [given my admittedly rough understanding of Geography](_URL_0_) translates in to: Central and South American illegals will all be sent to Mexico, regardless of country of origin.\n\nAnd sure, we can say that. And we can drop all those folks off at the border, where they will stay. Because, unless we use force to make them, Mexico doesn't have to let them in.\n\nSo, which of <PERSON>'s buddies do you think will get the contract to build the inevitable border slums that we'll also end up having to police and govern?", "356" ], [ "Sure, I wish people would go through the proper process for naturalization. I really do. Problem is, these people are already here. Can we undo that by deporting them? Sure. Should we deport them? That's a pretty hot debate right now.\n\nBut, the question that this particular argument is based around is: can we deport them to a country that they are not citizens of? The answer is no, not unless that country willingly accepts them. We can't take our illegal immigrants and just will them to be Mexico's illegal immigrants.", "796" ], [ "Yeah bud, that's more than worth a visit. It's hard to get past all the anxiety, the self-loathing and the apathy - but seeking help is worth it. I've been there, and it only gets worse; never better. Not on its own, anyway.\n\nI'm proud to say that I'm on medication, and getting regular help. It took a tremendous force of will to seek help at all, and to stick with it for the first couple of years where it seemed like I wasn't making progress.\n\nIf you can't afford help, your state likely has free or income-based services available to get you what you need. If you're having a hard time finding that help, feel free to PM me your city and state and I'll do my best to help you find something. I can't make any guarantees, but I'd be glad to try.\n\nIf you know of or find a place that can help you, and you're having a hard time convincing yourself to go, ask a friend or family member to text or call you *every day* until you schedule an appointment, and every day after that to make sure you keep it. A good friend did that for me, and it really helped me stay motivated.\n\nEdit - I'm going to get a few hours sleep, but feel free to message me if you need anything.", "873" ], [ "You can see it here, too. Plenty of folks dickering over where this first round of sanction removals is actually coming from, and the wisdom of following through.\n\nThe next round will be met by less criticism from the public, because the administration was able to excuse this one away. And supporters will be able to argue from firmer ground, without having to dig too much in to the wisdom and necessity of the next round, because this one was so easily excused.\n\nThe first two weeks of this term are the PR equivalent of lube and a pinky finger. We have yet to grasp how well and truly fucked we're going to be. By the time we figure it out (in six to ten years), we'll be crying to the world and trying to explain why we didn't resist, and these boys will be far outside the reach of our legal system.", "906" ], [ "Is it possible that they had to overestimate because they weren't sure what things would change during a woman's cycle under the affects of a zero gravity environment?\n\nWhat happens to frequency and severity of cycles under that new stress? Only way to find out is launch a woman in to space with a 100 count, and hope it's enough.\n\nYou don't want to under-shoot on that one, yet at the same it costs like ten grand a lb. to launch that cargo - so space is at a premium.\n\nYou don't pay ten grand to launch a pound of anything in to space, unless you're *absolutely* certain you're going to need it.", "359" ] ]
200
[ 2152, 24853, 5875, 4289, 5004, 15777, 22634, 1211, 8466, 6885, 9518, 21672, 4903, 15290, 3992, 2163, 18660, 13364, 10923, 12946, 25453, 23671, 997, 20348, 9566, 10115, 7445, 25169, 22966, 13895, 7742, 2178, 8341, 9481, 635, 23254, 15626, 23931, 18649, 448, 13925, 11531, 19822, 8462, 13554, 7299, 2203, 14297, 11376, 3369, 19737, 7651, 24370, 12753, 17142, 7219, 23996, 16732, 20641, 14409, 10840, 22776, 1894, 12504, 23839, 10135, 22772, 2813, 3739, 16203, 14071, 10852, 6508, 7987, 14907, 24040, 14317, 16394, 21805, 23886, 7603, 18398, 22480, 4722, 23661, 15101, 3751, 21580, 14101, 2532, 18541, 10466, 23006, 13810, 5902, 21376, 5484, 22912, 19878, 16920, 23021, 12961, 18873, 5717, 1856, 3570, 20194, 1403, 8201, 2380, 24639, 24127, 4434, 22650, 14157, 1270, 22151, 7156, 14831, 9309, 11860, 7501, 9731, 18314, 4644, 20540, 10810, 15458, 8859, 24495, 19118, 10655, 9937, 25447, 13349, 17747, 15592, 1089, 19782, 14271, 16169, 8699, 6820, 19509, 15319, 25300, 23961, 1434, 4687, 10451, 9205, 1023, 13294, 10772, 18198, 3491, 8282, 21228, 23752, 24032, 14287, 3658, 12690, 755, 8680, 20735, 3096, 3560, 4908, 22518, 9552, 7911, 10929, 1075, 8019, 4158, 14070, 1842, 14828, 11451, 14840, 17624, 6634, 14054, 18225, 8175, 17222, 25029, 17600, 3420, 21810, 20306, 13466, 6036, 317, 24399, 12469, 643, 8763, 2291, 18857, 13135, 2771, 14608, 17206, 8459, 16505, 1809, 21564, 20601, 7774, 41, 7966, 16994, 5833, 15796, 19619, 19219, 5452, 14328, 10884, 10973, 19955, 18084, 246, 14984, 15047, 21094, 5382, 10685, 16332, 10784, 22470, 18667, 2830, 4390, 2179, 12055, 15612, 20944, 12166, 9656, 20086, 13412, 23552, 18799, 15397, 6843, 15064, 15562, 5851, 3995, 21532, 23851, 23948, 4678, 17947, 1502, 9995, 2699, 10771, 13754, 18980, 12642, 4184, 16264, 3989, 20412, 3819, 7679, 23824, 13062, 20760, 688, 21657, 1887, 21368, 22371, 23784, 101, 469, 3272, 24941, 12610, 2096, 18986, 3086, 24272, 5266, 18583, 3554, 16574, 2732, 12009, 21578, 20825, 6189, 14304, 15040, 16707, 24088, 9545, 983, 4050, 4178, 15377, 21025, 18519, 10787, 14394, 7727, 14630, 8546, 18726, 3885, 14909, 4233, 12396, 1063, 9111, 18148, 15008, 2433, 5954, 19751, 3336, 4287, 17902, 4074, 6064, 15306, 22514, 9781, 6849, 9857, 13160, 3036, 13239, 3183, 14447, 19811, 20245, 23161, 15237, 22875, 19140, 12252, 10714, 13805, 17877, 24506, 226, 862, 5328, 5575, 15984, 3463, 14483, 18232, 17868, 10391, 20411, 4658, 14817, 11410, 25496, 7652, 11665, 7062, 466, 7140, 5135, 21223, 5226, 2766, 331, 6172, 9935, 5820, 19409, 6809, 1599, 8476, 5341, 21110, 11899, 24014, 24335, 8936, 5332, 151, 15149, 20169, 21009, 4816, 11520, 7872, 2900, 15277, 11081, 4517, 14999, 21037, 24269, 20255, 14537, 2763, 5005, 2632, 12994, 18652, 1175, 15602, 19059, 4333, 17732, 12714, 24872, 3635, 6562, 11657, 11264, 8162, 14870, 24451, 15850, 10956, 5543, 8254, 15015, 760, 5082, 604, 17605, 17250, 13704, 6978, 19042, 23796, 4154, 12535, 20752, 19858, 1663, 5559, 6344, 1262, 6771, 20480, 22172, 18724, 14747, 20287, 24118, 10350, 7703, 25006, 19518, 20827, 9011, 9283, 9963, 15316, 25401, 17627, 25177, 8506, 18748, 23858, 17620, 18187, 25387, 1438, 19438, 12678, 1745, 7099, 22569, 15205, 11576, 8029, 12295, 4583, 22126, 4633, 8834, 21863, 22658, 15881, 12285, 15341, 7012, 22056, 22028, 22637, 22317, 17424, 23395, 19041 ]
reddit_dump_-_-Doctor-_-
[ [ "Just a thought: for the sake of simplicity, you may want to consider condensing all of the \" a type of magic that lets the caster see the past, present, and future\" categories into Divination of some kind and then separating the methods out as schools or some such. \nAlso, I highly recommend [this book by <PERSON>_). It was used to form the backbone of a very, very good RPG supplement called The Laws of Thaumaturgy for Steve Jackson Games and provides a good foundation for the construction of magical systems. \nThat said, keep it up man, it looks good.", "491" ], [ "<PERSON> approaches the book from the perspective that magic is \"real\" (whatever that may mean) but his findings synthesize a great deal of literature, practice, and theory into something that makes a great deal of sense from a world-building perspective. \n\nIf you're in an environment intolerant of anything vaguely magical, I do not recommend flashing it around. I only say this because, after advising someone else on what a great book this is, they showed it to their fundamentalist parents and drama ensued. It's a well-written text that takes a scholarly approach and isn't \"dangerous\" or anything, I just don't want to get you in trouble. *The Laws of Thaumaturgy* is nearly impossible to find in print, but I know there are pdfs floating around.", "310" ], [ "I wouldn't call it a \"no go:\" I am sure you can find very good information on there... you can also find reliable information on Twitter, but that depends entirely on the source. I would not assume that, because it's on Medium, it's good. They pay their authors, so there may be some form of quality control, but it could also be based solely on hits. As with any other open platform, the credibility of the author may vary dramatically.\n\nWhat kind of information are you looking for?", "67" ], [ "You would need an abundance of \"rare earth minerals\" as well as lithium, cadmium, and others. You'd likely also need an abundance of (somewhat) easily reachable gold and silver. In order for all of these things to be near the surface, you'd need the planet to be tectonically active, though no more active than our earth (though you might want more). The tectonic activity would also be needed to provide a magnetic field capable of protecting the robots from both normal and exotic solar radiation. \n\nA planet like an Earth-sized Mercury (which is thought to be the core of a smashed planet) with a molten core would likely be ideal due to the abundance of metals as well as sufficient size to hold an atmosphere.", "78" ], [ "Since spirit guide meditations are deeply personal, I really can't speak to what is and isn't a good, direct source on the subject presented in magical/mystical/spiritual terms. \n\nI can however, provide a bit objective (i.e. scientific) material which may be helpful in deepening your understanding of the meditative process and thus get you where you need to go more easily. \nMany of the sources cited in [this paper](_URL_0_) are excellent for understanding the psychological and physiological processes at work, though the paper itself is not super helpful. Again, while this won't provide a step by step guide to spirit guide meditation, it will help you understand how you reach a meditative state and what that entails, which can in turn provide a firm foundation going forward.", "299" ], [ "Devil's Advocate\n\nWhile on the whole, I agree with <PERSON> (mostly due to some other things which put the whole thing in context), I don't think it's as cut and dry as some people are making it.\n\nThe stockings are part of her gimmick, an element that sets her apart, and, in a very real way, a part of her character. Here are some examples of other clothing items a fan could conceivably send to a wrestler that run the gamut from \"totally acceptable\" to \"dicey af:\"\n\n* A scarf for MJF\n* A noose for Hangman <PERSON>\n* A bottle of baby oil for <PERSON>\n* A white towel for <PERSON>\n* A black latex cutout of a handprint for <PERSON>\n\nSomewhere in there, it goes from reasonable to questionable.\n\nAgain, I am not saying it wasn't creepy, I am just saying it's not by default creepy and horrific. In a vacuum, without context, I could see it being an honest mistake. I think the disgust has more to do with the identity and tone of the sender than the item. Just think about how our response would be if a woman sent the stockings. Would it be different? Would we care if the sender was interested in women? If the note had been, you know, ***not*** creepy, would we be as offended? \n\nTo repeat: in this situation: creepy. In the end though, is it the item we find so dubious, or the sender's intent?", "710" ], [ "If anyone has ever been to an event with <PERSON>, they'll know he's an absolute class act. That said, there is plenty of evidence this wasn't always the case. Before he became the <PERSON> we know today (money, mainstream celebrity, etc), I can understand why he was protective of his brand. You could argue if he wasn't so diligent about protecting his brand, he might not be where he is today. I think he paid some of it back with his recent <PERSON> match at Mania. He's obviously matured a great deal in the last decade. Is there anyone that can look back at all the decisions they made 10 years ago and say \"Nope, no mistakes were made?\"", "820" ], [ "Depending on the epoxy and the size of the chunks, they might sink in water, meaning you could dump it in a bucket a little at a time then scoop the sawdust off the top. Also if the epoxy shavings are not the same size as the sawdust, a sieve might work to get it out. \n\nIf you can't get the epoxy out, I'd try a single batch of oysters or something fast using pftek, check the growth and, when the flush is done, cut open the cake. If there are little epoxy chunks in there, the mycelium didn't eat it. Most epoxy is nasty stuff though. \n\nThat said, you can get [hardwood pellets for pretty cheap](_URL_0_) (about $10). They just fall apart in water; even dry they crumble to dust with a little grinding.", "648" ], [ "I found the heating mats difficult to control with any kind of precision. I've already invested a fair bit in the rig, and mats with built-in temp control can get pricey. It's a balancing act I suppose. Directly pushing hot air into the tub would allow for fairly precise temperature control, but you run the risk of the hot air not defusing fast enough and cooking something. The open closet method might be viable for what I have to work with. Maybe a pvc frame and some cloth. \n\nI really appreciate the advice. I'll ponder on it.", "722" ] ]
325
[ 9876, 376, 14343, 13470, 16187, 9351, 19699, 19622, 7020, 18185, 22222, 22566, 9222, 12774, 25148, 13017, 18406, 8488, 23628, 11338, 10737, 2426, 12212, 12438, 14642, 9834, 23870, 19439, 12599, 7293, 22460, 13897, 595, 2401, 10916, 20676, 2042, 10107, 15906, 25085, 12108, 6446, 21803, 11057, 25418, 17659, 779, 8099, 123, 20888, 6940, 2385, 16839, 1199, 20890, 19715, 16788, 22234, 14133, 16722, 23332, 11609, 6405, 765, 404, 1441, 12899, 3935, 10658, 15804, 5138, 1528, 5353, 16838, 11169, 16429, 21706, 12415, 18676, 20820, 9220, 17665, 22031, 9638, 23153, 23164, 20324, 101, 3632, 14119, 2572, 8826, 590, 24505, 950, 9964, 21876, 17974, 16546, 15971, 3200, 8499, 13894, 20807, 19745, 22171, 22144, 10218, 627, 12486, 4557, 11968, 19990, 20918, 7181, 8509, 19656, 3095, 13160, 635, 271, 14028, 14520, 19614, 24507, 6086, 14141, 20937, 15402, 896, 15435, 17170, 23097, 1071, 14726, 8890, 17381, 3597, 22239, 11337, 2445, 15123, 19989, 1602, 18364, 23492, 19106, 6137, 5738, 1993, 18442, 11413, 20057, 9186, 15854, 17947, 1158, 1256, 2391, 10964, 16479, 5934, 2102, 25518, 9079, 14501, 5983, 9142, 5576, 14956, 11739, 21749, 9282, 13401, 8162, 23895, 13434, 11723, 5448, 15754, 14340, 19684, 6598, 20249, 8091, 2909, 4007, 14632, 12871, 9593, 17576, 6882, 10612, 10005, 24394, 18460, 5894, 4774, 9584, 23444, 24423, 13463, 5, 12945, 23085, 5724, 23121, 811, 12466, 11711, 11883, 5984, 5650, 11142, 13814, 4200, 6464, 6044, 19527, 23065, 12131, 13456, 14367, 17406, 23772, 12037, 13505, 9680, 20046, 24233, 24872, 2544, 3351, 11037, 15683, 13233, 13187, 8677, 24675, 23945, 4103, 442, 6567, 24189, 5480, 11452, 12029, 3017, 17923, 17229, 1911, 9626, 16167, 1795, 12463, 2589, 4570, 1623, 10330, 20833, 3799, 8056, 10475, 7650, 6495, 2986, 23690, 18288, 14121, 2381, 17298, 17530, 6428, 1654, 13723, 19051, 2625, 16054, 12889, 12396, 11667, 21223, 15476, 16164, 22409, 21158, 17122, 25429, 16186, 21318, 20645, 12230, 12266, 8712, 20854, 3666, 2705, 10806, 15724, 19226, 5055, 18755, 11278, 16499, 7859, 7236, 3283, 10308, 12850, 25309, 10414, 4144, 2472, 25161, 16322, 18855, 19500, 21884, 11952, 24137, 17157, 23903, 13779, 19066, 16272, 17040, 706, 23621, 22485, 2464, 6395, 19210, 9397, 11907, 16400, 14719, 11560, 6986, 19779, 14212, 3739, 17291, 1894, 8548, 3004, 13404, 13876, 13691, 4271, 3025, 4831, 9685, 8184, 1189, 7077, 11030, 10836, 3401, 25215, 10794, 8614, 15421, 1788, 12460, 1318, 2707, 18018, 22365, 8096, 11451, 1472, 23899, 1077, 12603, 8988, 4850, 11279, 3120, 17185, 2054, 5744, 3845, 5527, 14497, 4292, 8476, 22617, 10611, 16619, 3173, 18495, 1060, 10692, 18272, 10222, 25131, 23000, 24715, 13122, 19901, 13844, 14861, 20777, 2316, 14161, 13591, 1879, 6148, 9507, 23230, 4223, 19209, 4542, 22696, 6587, 11067, 18610, 11151, 18723, 21736, 24240, 7342, 18035, 1468, 9552, 2638, 10531, 22001, 6158, 15491, 1175, 12857, 1563, 7052, 4765, 3667, 10180, 25282, 21834, 4030, 3458, 18634, 24934, 14723, 24886, 24139, 21829, 14851, 21762, 9365, 18653, 9405, 11840, 3718, 9180, 7234, 10224, 8881, 11170, 13208, 334, 13185, 17639, 25103, 8292, 6299, 19207, 15853, 20467, 4665, 10441, 24674, 7172, 4258, 16027, 4419, 16501, 2946, 18697, 17503, 18752, 11900, 23785, 14001, 12104, 6454, 1740, 14769, 15845, 13294, 14484, 22380, 3913, 14116, 7033, 13772, 17876, 17030, 23036 ]
reddit_dump_-_-NAME-_-
[ [ "Not my picture I am not OP. OP always has a little blue microphone next to their name. I don't even have a 2070 I was just curious how you got them that low on Kawpow which is a very intensive algorithm and not at all comparable to gaming. It's more like a stress test. I mine eth and ravencoin and kawpow always pushes my AMD cards much harder. I don't have nvidia.", "816" ], [ "I'm honestly worried about the nodes being a volunteer network. I set one up and found it used like 70 GB of data in a day. There's no financial incentive to run one and if your ISP caps data it can actually cost a fair amount to do so because you will easily surpass most monthly caps. Not having enough nodes could mean longer transaction processing times and network congestion. I feel like that could hurt the coins long term growth. I admittedly am still learning so I might not understand something that makes this not the case. If so hopefully someone will enlighten me.", "543" ], [ "I have plenty of emotion and empathy for living people. I even have emotion and empathy for people who recently lost loved ones, but emotion and empathy for the hypothetical next of kin of a long since dead and cremated person stuffed in a bag in a wall? Cmon now. Nobody gives a shit about that bag of ash.", "981" ], [ "Man I'm just talking about paying off maybe half the value of a few cards. That said you have to understand a few things. 1 that we're only talking about the hashrate of GPU miners and 2 that it's not a 1 to 1 conversion. So if 50% of GPU miners move over RVN hashrate will increase by something like 60% of Ethereums hashrate divided by 2 divided by 2. <PERSON> did an analysis of this very topic. Built a model and everything.", "543" ], [ "> I think you're saying RVN is more of an escape plan than it is a long-term solution.\n\nYeah I mean my original comment only says you will \"likely\" be able to recover the rest if and when Ethereum mining goes to shit. It's not exactly saying RVN moon or anything. I've got some Ravencoin put away and mined a few just in case because it costs less than the price of a good dinner right now and I don't care if I lose it, but I'm not about to invest anything significant in a coin worth $0.16 I wouldn't advise anyone else to either. <PERSON> said the money was already spent though and I was just mentioning it as an option before selling the cards.", "831" ], [ "Bikes are all about forward motion. If the bike isn't moving you keep a foot on the ground. Like a kick stand. As long as the bike is moving and you keep your body straight the bike won't fall over. It's all about confidence really. You don't need any real skill. You just have to pedal and believe and not do anything crazy with the handle bars or your weight. No big movements except on the pedals.", "318" ], [ "Riding a bike doesn't really take coordination or balance like the other things you mentioned. All you have to do is pedal and if you stop put a foot on the ground. It's really that simple. Most people I see struggle to ride a bike it's because they are trying to do too much. You don't really even need the handle bars to go straight. It's really just about keeping forward motion. It more or less balances itself while moving. I mean think about it. We don't drive bikes. We ride them. Very little operation required. You're not the driver you're the engine.", "990" ], [ "Just talk about the Louisiana purchase. Like did you know that <PERSON> purchased more than 800,000 square miles from <PERSON> in 1803? And in that one deal bought the land that would eventually make up 15 states including Louisiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Iowa, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, and Oklahoma along with most of Kansas, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, and Minnesota? Here's an interesting fact too. The Louisiana Purchase almost didn't happen. Congress passed the purchase with a vote of 59-57, with many leaders opposing <PERSON> plan. They thought it might start a war with Spain, and that the President didn't have the right to do it.", "619" ], [ "I've never had any problems with them and I have bought from them and withdrawn to my wallet several times. I just filled a buy limit order at 0.150 for about $20 worth of RVN last night and withdrew it to my wallet. I've never had an order partially filled. I don't know how long the process takes or what it's like. I understand your frustration, but I doubt Bittrex is going to rob you.", "71" ], [ "Running a register is not a skill. It's designed to be intuitive. And they've already created technology to replace that position and honestly, it's far superior. Customer interaction is completely unnecessary 90% of the time and we have machines on assembly lines that fry and broil food every day in mass quantities. These jobs are already obsolete and often poorly done. And I've worked these jobs. They aren't hard. They are basically brainless.", "28" ], [ "First if god was real you couldn't speak for what he would do. And there's the whole concept of free will. Second he might feel very different about different things he created. Like say if some of the things he created had more of him in it. Think of it like this. You're an artist. You doodle on a napkin for 5 minutes. You also spend a month on a painting. The napkin gets thrown in the trash. No big deal. The painting however you care what happens to it. Just another perspective to consider.", "916" ], [ "Have you worked these jobs? Because I've worked in fast food and in retail and at a grocery store. And I worked with some of the dumbest most useless brain dead people I've ever met. Some were drug addicts. Some were literally drunk at work. Sorry if me calling it brainless gets your panties in a bunch, but it is. They are jobs that literally anyone can do. I even see them hire people that are actually mentally disabled. All you do is roll your eyes because you have no rebuttal. You can't argue with reality without looking like a fucking dumbass. So you resort to mockery.", "941" ], [ "I did not argue anything about a living wage. I argued against these being skilled jobs. You just moved the goal post because you couldn't actually counter. And it is a living wage. You can live on minimum wage. I did for years. If you want a higher standard of living you have to develop skills and get a better job than Burger King. You Don't deserve a 3 bedroom house and a $30,000 car for existing. Money doesn't grow on trees. If you want more money you have to provide more value.", "466" ], [ "Expertise is literally a synonym for skill lol. Running a register, again, is intuitive. It requires no ability to do well. Anyone can do it. And the assertion that people in these jobs have good customer service skills is erroneous. You like your definitions when they suit you, but living wage has one and you didn't cite it.\n\nLiving Wage:\n\na wage that is high enough to maintain a normal standard of living.\n\n A minimum wage is enough to achieve this. Luxuries are not part of a normal standard of living. A normal standard of living includes food, shelter, clothing, etc. An arbitrary number a state decides on is not reflective of real life. And the comment about 30k car and a 3 bedroom house was obvious hyperbole. I don't really care if you're offended on behalf of other people. They are paid for the value they provide. Which is little. If the wage is raised they will be replaced with automation. You're not going to make 100,000 $8 an hour jobs become 100,000 $16 an hour jobs. Those jobs are for the most part just going to disappear entirely. So I'm glad that's all you have to say about this <PERSON> because you don't really understand it anyway.\n\nEdit: Formatting", "466" ], [ "<PERSON> regularly said \"and that's all I got to say about that\" it was meant to be humorous not insulting. Was attempting to have a light hearted moment. When I speak of value I'm talking about the value someone brings to the market. Not value I personally place on someone. I'm going to ignore your absurd request for state to state information on living costs. Not only is it requesting too much work, but state wide averages are irrelevant to this conversation.", "248" ], [ "Because the whole point of a PC is it's an open hardware platform. When you make it a tiny compact device that can't be easily accessed or upgraded full of integrated parts it might as well be a Mac. Or a Cell Phone. Or a Tablet. And very few if any people actually need a Laptop. Most mobile tasks could be done on any mobile device and don't require a lot of power. More and more people work from Tablets for example. That type of device isn't about peak performance. It doesn't belong in this conversation.", "127" ], [ "You can't understand me because you're dumb as a pile of doorknobs. I was hoping you'd just fuck off out my inbox like I asked. I don't like you. I've repeatedly insulted you. You keep coming back. Do you get off on this shit or something? Do you think we're going to come to some understanding? Are you trying to achieve some hollow internet victory? All rhetorical questions. I don't care. Fuck off.", "248" ], [ "Article II, Section 2, Clause I of the Constitution, the president of the United States is “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several States. The President IS the Supreme Commander of the military and they must obey his orders. You swear to defend the Constitution, but you also swear to obey the orders of the President and all superior officers.", "216" ] ]
435
[ 14597, 19974, 24261, 12323, 1024, 8144, 19094, 11777, 24343, 5009, 24120, 7757, 14490, 6763, 21302, 10681, 16951, 10474, 8979, 16510, 9674, 3618, 1629, 13473, 4625, 7690, 12283, 13341, 3711, 6254, 1327, 2127, 13142, 8612, 2651, 8840, 19643, 6121, 17847, 17340, 25049, 2537, 6272, 3113, 21798, 15987, 16739, 17064, 1238, 17408, 6214, 8080, 25341, 11216, 864, 1312, 10185, 5198, 2362, 4038, 2491, 22560, 21683, 17842, 6964, 3824, 25269, 15946, 6455, 15821, 3828, 18007, 22919, 5282, 24476, 1332, 20332, 20765, 21282, 7995, 14952, 25205, 9384, 12904, 1723, 10715, 10712, 12485, 6730, 11908, 11443, 4844, 2125, 23579, 12245, 8817, 14743, 14656, 8231, 9599, 5383, 14885, 12294, 8692, 61, 14018, 16278, 13709, 12147, 21585, 17087, 17297, 23687, 6277, 11555, 25175, 10874, 23436, 14859, 18945, 4609, 11807, 21882, 22446, 14922, 24162, 19977, 2477, 1594, 9377, 8195, 3821, 16362, 1625, 18899, 24336, 566, 8792, 2686, 1955, 20953, 22176, 16859, 3903, 23986, 21420, 8610, 6711, 8186, 14754, 19126, 20603, 5783, 22321, 25265, 21549, 13666, 5676, 1851, 17016, 6568, 11245, 3785, 13348, 6608, 4788, 23052, 6058, 4163, 18212, 3735, 20225, 10211, 10664, 18387, 9938, 8151, 1589, 20930, 23159, 7676, 6545, 12581, 13492, 10301, 9098, 20875, 19245, 17738, 18766, 8619, 2255, 2908, 14110, 9856, 4001, 3280, 9270, 10700, 1505, 2823, 10161, 22600, 14129, 25299, 17496, 3037, 6784, 23368, 18405, 20927, 9051, 7878, 19234, 10858, 22326, 25354, 19663, 418, 15366, 6119, 20256, 352, 16441, 10948, 11408, 14959, 8490, 9275, 5628, 10251, 5061, 11549, 18090, 11222, 3296, 22814, 16104, 8866, 22366, 14177, 10368, 6991, 17333, 10109, 17984, 3662, 7946, 14400, 11811, 6663, 19172, 11948, 2026, 20258, 3225, 17331, 8185, 16822, 1840, 19691, 25108, 13277, 5881, 24180, 20233, 8007, 21424, 7622, 10898, 5672, 15897, 14947, 1184, 17309, 22068, 6291, 23977, 5029, 19026, 1289, 20823, 24480, 7404, 14579, 14568, 22275, 11306, 6041, 10437, 2597, 12397, 19741, 21281, 9792, 20460, 16062, 17284, 22952, 12473, 19801, 6672, 6286, 4629, 10110, 9873, 5939, 25253, 22847, 12737, 23792, 4876, 7415, 16102, 9630, 20882, 6934, 8181, 2915, 14972, 23847, 6126, 19463, 24215, 20126, 21121, 18309, 19250, 10507, 12093, 8925, 25166, 23163, 23563, 8764, 25356, 18435, 13290, 372, 21983, 3997, 15727, 13446, 4361, 1892, 23876, 18510, 25219, 17360, 5696, 16934, 8108, 13355, 20091, 25147, 14217, 22519, 24157, 21426, 9053, 20336, 24487, 11537, 14246, 20897, 7904, 3877, 3087, 18525, 11150, 24887, 14201, 9078, 17644, 10982, 16986, 8257, 1715, 12793, 16239, 21261, 22508, 11683, 14853, 3747, 7103, 8483, 14487, 13334, 21325, 23248, 24186, 0, 20923, 21817, 16156, 10139, 12641, 24923, 17203, 25479, 15385, 1185, 17759, 5336, 4015, 660, 12617, 5204, 14039, 8114, 19554, 13197, 21858, 971, 22363, 5796, 24788, 6026, 18163, 13358, 9771, 11386, 5651, 14465, 24584, 6303, 19113, 3581, 14178, 15542, 20398, 7954, 12289, 2105, 17043, 6489, 6718, 23250, 2299, 7511, 22984, 8698, 3150, 21079, 21735, 19050, 11666, 23790, 19406, 6374, 8197, 2929, 6075, 13784, 11958, 11664, 6293, 18888, 16534, 9373, 9733, 20991, 24185, 1352, 6256, 25338, 4515, 25099, 23494, 11830, 11183, 10597, 7883, 6734, 24702, 11557, 15928, 1981, 3907, 5457, 16852, 9454, 7182, 23993, 5709, 16447, 12049, 3501, 17287, 1608, 11016, 20309, 20017, 10176, 22949, 8136, 16071, 3588 ]
reddit_dump_-_-_-_-otalp-_-_-_-
[ [ "I don't think they see it coming, but Wall Street and the ycombinator community on HackerNews(a useful proxy for silicon valley worker sentiment) have turned on Tesla the last few weeks. \n\nIn many ways I think <PERSON> represents the limit of what you can do under capitalism. I think his motive with his companies is genuinely not personal profit or selling people stuff, but really is to push humanity forward. \n\nEven with good motives and billions of dollars, if you're doing something non-trivial(unlike selling customer data which requires little capital expenditure) you're going to burn through all your cash in months unless you have a path to profitability. In order to be profitable in an industry with high barriers to entry(most industries), you *have* to exploit the workforce and vehemently fight unionisation. There's really no way a new entrant in the car industry can survive with a strong union and giving their workers good benefits - even with tons of government subsidies, which Tesla gets but is going to dry up soon. Even if the entire management is run by socialists and anarchists, attempts to have worker control will destroy the company, because all the profits in the industry have been made by exploiting people beyond what they can handle. \n\nConsequently, having strong union laws can actually reduce competition because it prevents new entrants from exploiting workers, while GM and Ford have to exploit workers less these days because they've built a solid foundation over decades of worker exploitation. \n\nThat's why <PERSON> was opposed to things like stronger labour laws, a higher minimum wage and universal healthcare: these things benefit capitalism in the long run because it makes worker life tolerable while preventing competition. The companies opposed to these things(and most tech companies support them to an extent) value short term profits over the long term sustenance of the system. \n\nAs for his outlandish claims, if he was even reasonably in touch with reality with his statements none of his companies would have been able to raise billions. Tesla cars currently being sold with \"self driving hardware\"(that comes at an extra $3000), are *never* going to be self-driving as everyone in tech knows. But it's excellent PR even if it is borderline criminal to advertise it as such.", "49" ], [ "<PERSON> has repeatedly stated that he supports a full and through investigation into <PERSON>'s ties with Russia. But he has also extensively documented not only the media's obsession with it, but how everytime they falsely report something on it, *it is always in the direction of falsely proving collusion*. Things like the ridiculous Hamilton 68 got cited so much that even the creators had to come out plead with media to stop referring to everything online as the work of russian bots. \n\n<PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON> are increasingly being dismissed as Russian pawns. Any activism online is increasingly being dismissed as the work of bots. \n\nBy all means, investigate the collusion. But when MSNBC, the so called \"liberal\" channel, spends 95% of time talking about Russiagate and literally 0 seconds(until they were called out) talking about a massive teacher's strike, you know that the situation is just being used to deflect from real change. \n\nLook at the liberal admiration of former <PERSON> appointed FBI directors: <PERSON> and <PERSON>. <PERSON> wanted Apple to create a backdoor for government spying. He's a hero to liberals. <PERSON> lied about Iraq having WMDs to Congress. He's considered the second coming of <PERSON> by democrats. \n\nWhat's amazing is that pointing this out gets critiqued even in supposedly left-leaning sub like this! The world is in a very bad place.", "860" ], [ "There's not a single time that <PERSON> or <PERSON> have said that russian interference *isn't* objectionable. Nobody says this. \n\nYou have election interference of all kinds. If your goal is to have elections with a well informed populace, what are the major factors stopping it?\n\n- Nobody seriously claims that Russia influenced the election more than Fox News, <PERSON>, the <PERSON> or US corporations. \n\n- Interference by US entities is something that US citizens, through pressure on their government *can do something about*. \n\n- The internet is free and open, and you're *never* going to stop entities from buying ads and making bots on it, *except* pressuring the companies that have a monopoly to exert more control on the internet, essentially making it less free and open. \n\n- This has already begun. Google has drastically punished all non-mainstream sites: so sites like Truth Out, Alternet, DemocracyNow, Intercept, Al Jazeera, etc. have been heavily demoted on Google Search. On the other hand, 'reliable' sources such as the WSJ, WaPo, NYT have been promoted. On a <PERSON> sub I hope I don't have to explain the problems with this. \n\n- If you truly care about informing citizens, the easiest way to start would be reducing corporate and billionaire control over politicians and media. This is something we can literally do tomorrow if the right people are in control and will have a 10x bigger impact than if you somehow stopped other states from buying ads. Influencing the decisions of Russia or other state actors are not just harder, they are basically impossible unless you have hegemony over them. Luckily russian influence on the US election is negligible compared to internal factors that the US can do a lot about.", "169" ], [ "> The reason media outlets are covering the Russia story so much is because of ratings. People are obsessed with the Russia story and they want to hear about it. That is the media bias -- toward ratings -- toward giving the public what they watch the most.\n\n > I'm only saying this to reject the notion you're suggesting that there is primarily a pro-liberal political bias driving how much they cover Russiagate.\n\nI don't know if I can sum up the whole point of Manufacturing Consent in one comment. There are so many events happening now that the population would be more incredibly interested about - if they even knew it was happening. \n\n- The J20 protestors are facing 50+ years in prison for protesting - this is the kind of stuff that happens in Russia or Saudi Arabia, you can have enormous media coverage at the outrageous nature of the case and precedence it will set for the future of democracy. \n\n- Chemical weapons are in the news lately, but what's never mentioned the the US supplies chemical weapons that Saudi Arabia has used on children in Yemen, again - outrageous, and even more outrageous for US citizens as their own tax money is going towards this. \n\n- We know that there are many issues in the recent past - net neutrality and <PERSON> for example, that have huge interest behind them but are scarcely covered by media. \n\nThe reason is not a conscious pro-liberal bias - it's what has always existed in the media: don't question serious power, because then you'll get into serious trouble. It's not like <PERSON> or the Washington Post editors are even completely aware of this- again, hard to sum up the entire point of The Propaganda Model in one comment, but let's just say that The Washington Post praises the war criminal and chemical weapon user MBS not because <PERSON> recently had a friendly dinner with him, but because the editors *wouldn't be the editors* if they hadn't long internalised and believe that US power shouldn't be questioned(See the excellent Intercept piece by <PERSON> on how NYT editors surpassed negative coverage of the Iraq War by saying they \"wanted to remain in mainstream opinion\"(at a time when a near majority of people were opposed to the war - mainstream here means mainstream power consensus, though the editors might not believe that)). Same with Russiagate - **it doesn't threaten any serious US centre of power, so it's allowed**. \n\nAs to surveillance - well with a 15 years of surveillance the FBI or NSA cannot point to a single folied terorroist attack(there are about 3 ludicrous ones they claim to justify a multi-billion dollar system, but even that didn't involve a direct threat to US civillains) However they are and will be used to shut down any protests against government or centers of power, which is why both historically and the present the FBI is far more concerned with surveilling and disrupting black activism from MLK to BLM(_URL_0_) than White Supremacists, who constitute a significant part of the police force. \n\nNot to mention that this is hardly the worst thing <PERSON> has done - he just happens to be an extremist who literally thinks it should be impossible for anyone to communicate without the government having access to their communication - de facto making it impossible for any activism that seriously threatens power.", "853" ], [ "I'm not oversimplifying it - if anything I'm explaining how it's more complicated than saying \"they're doing it for ratings\". \n\nIf you look at the general population - <PERSON> is the most population by far, but is barely covered and seen as fringe. There has been majority public support of universal healthcare and higher minimum wage but this is seen as far-left issues. \n\nThe public is certainly concerned about Middle-east terrorism. The biggest supporter of it - and the one that there's strong evidence had involvement in 9/11 - which would outrage every American, is of course Saudi Arabia, whose leader gets glowing puff pieces from the NYT. Imagine the news cycle if Iran were involved in 9/11 or using Chemical Weapons on civilians - it would be 24/7. There's no historical difference between Iran and Saudi Arabia to the general public - except that the US supports one, so the citizenry don't even know what they are supporting, but there is so much focus on the the (comparatively) less criminal nation of Iran in the name of \"human rights\". \n\nIf that was truly the concern it would be easy to stop the biggest humanitarian crisis in the world right now, being carried out by SA.", "985" ], [ "<PERSON> is a good source for contemporary writings on India and <PERSON> write a good book on <PERSON>. I think you might be referring to Aryan Invasion Theory which has largely been disproven. \n\nI have a pretty good understanding of India and Indian history, and in my opinion it's not incorrect to call Hindu Nationalism fascism despite a few minor differences. \n\n- For one, a large part of it talks about taking society back to 'the good old days' of pre-Mughal invasion, which is lionised as some sort of utopia far greater than any civilisation today or in history despite heavy casteism and misogyny. \n\n- There is a strong hatred of things that \"degrade the superior hindu culture\" like western movies and clothes. \n\n- There is a huge scare and fear-mongering about hindu-muslim couples and persecution of them. When the man happens to be muslim, it is considered \"Love-Jihad\" and there is widespread acknowledgement that this is a plot to destroy hinduism by converting away women. \n\n- Misogyny is rife, as is the belief in female traditionalism - the majority of young men and *women* believe that it is acceptable for a husband to hit his wife according to an extensive UN study - this, in a country where martial rape is completely legal. \n\n- <PERSON> is not particularly reviled in many parts of the country, with many seeing him as a patriot who lost. Other despots are not particularly hated either. In one state the ruling leader literally named his son(and soon to be successor) <PERSON>. \n\n- Intellectuals, scientists, atheists, anti-superstition activists and rationalists are murderered, driven out and beaten. \n\n- There is a lot of cult and idol worship - idol worship extends to political figures, and there's a lot of big-brother vibes. \n\n- People who openly call for the ethnic cleansing of muslims occupy high positions of the government and are widely respected by the public(the current PM likely was involved in ethnic cleansing himself). \n\n- The existing government works with corporations to reduce taxes and unionisation. The left that existed in many states as mentioned in the interview have virtually been decimated and large images of <PERSON> are found everywhere in the country - a sinister departure from previous governments. For context the previous(largely popular) PM was a soft-spoken liberal economist who was the anti-thesis of the current deified one - which is a departure from norm since the ruling class of Congress under the <PERSON> family saw hindu nationalism as dangerous and unstable.", "858" ], [ "A lot of them have the same problems, which is why early race scientists included anatomists and anthropologists. There's also a big [Replication Problem](_URL_0_) in medicine, which is why you see rapidly changing headlines on what food is good or bad for you. \n\nEconomics in particular is vulnerable because it is heavily funded by corporations/WallSt and close to 40% of studies are not replicated. Studies which benefit the status-quo are not heavily scrutinised while those that lay out a case for something out of the mainstream have ideologues come out in masses to shred them. A good example would be someone like <PERSON>, a chief economist at the IMF who warned that there was an impending crisis in 2005 but was dismissed and mocked as a luddite.", "569" ], [ "If the author has not replicated the research, it *is* an argument from authority, though often a justified one. After all, replication doesn't get you grants, new research does. But very often even when replicating scientists dismiss results that go against the prevailing authority. A real world example, which <PERSON> said was a great shame to Science and scientists, would be how the values of the [Oil Drop experiment](_URL_0_) changed. \n\nMillikan got a number much lower than the real value. Scientists took a long time to finally reach the true value despite dozens of replication attempts. <PERSON> explains: \n\n > Why didn't they discover the new number was higher right away? It's a thing that scientists are ashamed of—this history—because it's apparent that people did things like this: When they got a number that was too high above <PERSON>'s, they thought something must be wrong—and they would look for and find a reason why something might be wrong. When they got a number close to <PERSON>'s value they didn't look so hard. And so they eliminated the numbers that were too far off, and did other things like that ...", "569" ], [ "> Americans say \"look at those brutal Russians, aiding <PERSON> to gas Syrian civilians\" while they starve Yemeni children; meanwhile, people in Russia say \"look at those brutal Americans, aiding Saudi Arabia to starve Yemeni children\" \n\nI agree. Both of those are whataboutism. The case here is Americans saying stop giving Saudi Arabia chemical weapons, which is the exact opposite of whataboutism - it's about literally stopping your own criminal actions. \n\n > If America can constructively (key word here being constructively, not just bombing until <PERSON> is dead) do something to avoid chemical weapons attacks, it should do so.\n\nAgain, agree. Easiest way to do so would be to stop providing chemical weapons and cluster bombs for Saudi Arabia to kill civilians with. That can be done tomorrow. It's in our hands. Syria is far more complicated. It's not a case of *never do anything about things you're not responsible for*, it's this: if the motive truly is human rights, start with stopping the human rights abuses you're carrying out. That's far easier than influencing a non-ally state.", "819" ], [ "Yes, but if you don't actually replicate it yourself you're taking it as a matter of faith. Moreover, replication isn't really incentivised either, and that leads to further biases. The wiki page of Argument from Authority gives two nice examples of the reality of doing science: \n\n > An example of the use of the appeal to authority in science can be seen in 1923, when leading American zoologist <PERSON> declared, based on poor data and conflicting observations he had made,[20][21] that humans had 24 pairs of chromosomes. From the 1920s to the 1950s, this continued to be held based on <PERSON>'s authority,[22][23][21] despite subsequent counts totaling the correct number of 23.[20][24] Even textbooks[20] with photos showing 23 pairs incorrectly declared the number to be 24[24] based on the authority of the then-consensus of 24 pairs.[25]\n\n > This seemingly established number created confirmation bias among researchers, and \"most cytologists, expecting to detect <PERSON>'s number, virtually always did so\".[25] <PERSON>'s \"influence was so great that many scientists preferred to believe his count over the actual evidence\",[24] to the point that \"textbooks from the time carried photographs showing twenty-three pairs of chromosomes, and yet the caption would say there were twenty-four\".[24] Scientists who obtained the accurate number modified[26] or discarded[27] their data to agree with <PERSON>'s count.\n\n > A more recent example involved the \"When contact changes minds: An experiment on transmission of support for gay equality\" paper. The paper was a fraud based on forged data, yet concerns about it were ignored in many cases due to appeals to authority. One analysis of the affair notes that \"Over and over again, throughout the scientific community and the media, <PERSON>’s impossible-seeming results were treated as truth, in part because of the weight [the study's co-author] <PERSON>’s name carried\".[28] One psychologist stated his reaction to the paper was \"that’s very surprising and doesn’t fit with a huge literature of evidence. It doesn’t sound plausible to me... [then I pull it up and] I see <PERSON> is an author. I trust him completely, so I’m no longer doubtful\". The forger, <PERSON>, would use appeals to authority to defend his research: \"if his responses sometimes seemed to lack depth when he was pressed for details, his impressive connections often allayed concerns\", with one of his partners stating \"when he and I really had a disagreement, he would often rely on the kind of arguments where he’d basically invoke authority, right? He’s the one with advanced training, and his adviser is this very high-powered, very experienced person...and they know a lot more than we do\".[28]\n\n > **Much like the erroneous chromosome number taking decades to refute until microscopy made the error unmistakable, the one who would go on to debunk this paper \"was consistently told by friends and advisers to keep quiet about his concerns lest he earn a reputation as a troublemaker\"**, up until \"the very last moment when multiple 'smoking guns' finally appeared\", and he found that \"There was almost no encouragement for him to probe the hints of weirdness he’d uncovered\".[28]", "569" ], [ "Yes, I understand. But in reality most parts of the chain do not get tested. Moreover, scientific papers don't always say \"*If* X study is true, this holds\". They say \"X study has been shown this to be true, and that's why my result is true\". Of course, you can always in theory go back and try to replicate X. But there are problems in reality. If X is widely accepted and has the backing of influential figures and is also expensive to replicate, you're not going to get funding for it. \n\nSo while in *theory* it can be replicated, social factors like the weight of authority behind it, how much acceptance it has amongst the scientific community and the funding needed to replicate it make it *in reality* a matter of faith if people cannot replicate it without harming their careers or using up their grant money.", "569" ], [ "> The only way to not make a paper an argument from authority is for every individual who reads it to go back and test every relevant piece of information pertaining to it\n\nYes\n\n > something thats impossible to do\n\nYes\n\n > To the reader the author is just another person claiming things when the reader hasnt done them themself\n\nYes, though if the author says he has replicated every single argument then it is a matter of trust. If the reader than uses this paper for his own argument without replicating them himself it becomes an argument from authority. \n\nOf course none of this means that science is useless or worthless. The whole structure is set up in a way so that over time these arguments from authority can be tested and replicated. After all if you're going to launch a rocket or create a pill you can't run on completely false arguments. \n\nThe difference between science and say religion, is that in the latter some arguments from authority *must not* be questioned. In science they can *in theory* be questioned even if in reality there are significant barriers. However if you're building something in the real world that makes use of these theories and it doesn't work for some reason, or if an observation is at odds with the existing theory, you're going to have to go and question every argument from authority no matter how deeply entrenched, and if it's considered an important topic the previously existing barriers drop off. This is why hard sciences generally progress faster than something like economics, where you cannot question certain things because they are not profitable or threaten centres of power.", "569" ], [ "Citations in <PERSON>'s book also make use of the work of Human Rights organisations, local newspapers, historians and other intellectuals. Most this indeed is an argument from some authority because the evidence presented comes from some source that in most cases I trust because of their track record, even if they may be wrong on any individual case. \n\nBut it's useful in the real world in the same way science is useful, and therefore worth discussing.", "520" ], [ "Evidence you haven't found yourself is indeed reliant upon you trusting an external entity who says that something is true or that they've observed something. \n\nHowever nobody would function if you literally never trusted anyone other than yourself. You have to make approximations and trust people based on their perceived track record or standing amongst other people with a good track record. This is fine and necessary to do anything in the world. \n\nIf your sources(or authorities) are not acting in bad faith or delusional, you're going to get evidence which is *largely* true and helps construct a realistic view of the the world. But there are caveats here, and ways it can go wrong, as shown in the examples I gave about science taking much longer to progress than it should have, because of sociological factors which can be changed.", "569" ], [ "Yes, I'd agree with both statements. I'm less interested however in this kind of discussion about epistemology and more interested in how sociological factors direct science. The study of elementary particles for instance was considered useless and not worth funding, until it's potential for weaponry was realised, when massive funding went into it to the point where it still dominates science today. Social factors influence the direction and sometimes results of science, and that I think is worth studying and improving.", "569" ], [ "Evidence =/= Proof. All data is evidence, from both our senses and other people. Whether the evidence is correct or can be used to prove something true, is a different matter. \n\nI mean, it's impossible to disprove that Universe came into existence just 30 seconds ago - that all the atoms in the universe and neurones in your brain just popped into existence 30 seconds ago. It is of course completely unfalsifiable and has no evidence supporting it, but that doesn't mean it's not true. \n\nI think you're asking when will an argument form authority turn into *proof* that something is true. From an epistemological standpoint - never. This is hardly something radical or modern either. One of <PERSON>'s biggest influences, <PERSON>, was the one who famously came to the same conclusion: <PERSON>. \n\nThe only thing you can know for certain is that you're thinking. That is all. Everything else, you could be wrong or mistaken about or might be an illusion.", "844" ], [ "The argument mostly is not that the United States should never be involved in affairs it wasn't directly responsible for, it is that it never does so primarily because of humanitarian reasons. \n\nThis is important, because the illusion of the US caring for human rights is what allows Saudi Arabia to carry out violations of human rights. How can you question the US support of this when after all the US is the leading voice of human rights? \n\nSometimes the state's interest just so happens to align with the interests of humanity. But we have to be careful not to draw morality from this. <PERSON> and <PERSON> were opposed to <PERSON> not because fascism is evil - they after all admired <PERSON> and both countries initially supported <PERSON>, but they were opposed to him because of the geopolitical instability that he started. But that was not the lessons of WWII - the lessons were that the UK and US were deeply moral agents when in fact they were just preserving order and this happened to be for the benefit of humankind when in most cases it isn't. \n\nThat's the same point - make a case for being involved in Syria(even <PERSON> doesn't advocate simply leaving the region) if you want, but don't ascribe morality to the US for doing so - but this is being done, and this will make stopping the atrocities committed by the US much harder to do.", "819" ], [ "It's not how reddit works. Karma is still Karma, the top comments will still be the ones with highest upvotes(circlejerk). If anything, people stop upvoting/downvoting once they see a comment has a lot of points(since their individual vote won't change much). If scores are hidden, people are going to upvote and downvote more. It amplifies the circlejerk. \n\nr/politics is a subreddit which hides karma for 24 hours and they are one of the biggest circlejerks in the history of the internet. \n\nOne solution would be to randomise the comment order, which is possible, but people aren't coming here to see comments of random quality, they click on a thread to see top comments. \n\nTL;DR: Human nature sucks", "263" ], [ "If we win the CL, I recommend making a final, collaborative mega When I'm Liverpool and retiring the meme. In fact, I'd ask you to consider saving your 2nd leg WIL for the post-final one. \n\nIf we lock top 4 at Brighton, I plan on making an edited compilation of every WIL this season like I did [last year](_URL_0_). Last year, I had to add a lot of content since there were only like 4 When I'm Liverpools, but this year it'll probably just be editing together the best parts of all the videos put out this season \n\nAs far as I'm aware, aside from a couple of one-offs the only people who've made multiple When I'm Liverpools are you, me and <PERSON>. I think we can all agree to retire the meme after this season.", "423" ], [ "I'm sure you *feel* persecuted. Nevermind that Reddit is the internet's largest white sumpremacist platform and the <PERSON> sub has twice as many subscribers as the sanders sub. Never mind that open white supramcists have millions of followers and patrons on twitter and youtube. No, you are the oppressed one. No one is more oppressed than you. The most oppressed group in the world right now is undoubtedly the one you belong too. That's just being objective. That's what you *feel* and what you see in your bubble, never mind trying to see who the people who actually hold power are.", "633" ], [ "Anyone who thinks Black Lives Matter is a hierarchal organisation with well defined leaders clearly has no idea at all what they're talking about. Next you're going to say that the Hacker 4chan from Anonymous is a racist so you hate Anonymous. Anyone can start a black lives matter chapter. Anyone can start an Antifa chapter. Anyone can claim to be Anonymous. \n\nYou don't go register at BLM LLC to become a member lol", "577" ], [ "There are no 'levels'. Anyone can organize events. If you want to start a protest, you can. You don't have to be CEO of BLM Corp. to organize events. Any random person can start and most people attending the event don't even know what started it. \n\nI can start a Twitter account, tweet some popular stuff at first, then proclaim myself to be a leader of a BLM chapter I started and say whatever the hell I want. According to you this would make me \"a leader\" and my views would represent the entire movement.", "577" ], [ "Yes. Ignore every argument: The president, the party having the house, the senate. The most watched news channel. Most local news outlets. Most tabloids. All owned by conservative white people who are apparently super oppressed. \n\nAll of this is not enough. Even if you come across one dissenting view from a 14 year old girl on tumblr(which you used as an example to show how white people are oppressed???) it is undeniable proof that white people are oppressed. \n\nIgnore all this, focus on my explanation for why anyone would have a such a ridiculous view.", "1020" ], [ "Please show me a poll which says most or any significant number black people in the US think white people are defects and need to be removed. If you cannot do this, your entire argument makes no sense \n\nIs your argument really \"one random person on Twitter that most people haven't heard of said something and claims to represent a movement that anyone can claim to represent, therefore, everyone who doesn't immediately disavow the movement agrees with them\"?", "987" ], [ "Business elites and most of the population don't really care about <PERSON>. It's a comedy show and since it's HBO(less reliance on ads) <PERSON> and his team are given creative freedom. It's the same reason why an Anarchist show like Mr.Robot is acclaimed - good entertainment but little impact on policy. \n\nCorporate Tax Avoidance is also a pretty mainstream issue for both liberals and conservatives: <PERSON> talks all the time about making Apple bring back tax from overseas. It's not really a super important issue for businesses and it doesn't really challenge neoliberal capitalism: it is just a policy opinion.", "323" ], [ "Made what claim? <PERSON> says IQ differs between races, that it is heritable(genetic), and that the validity of testing iq and its importance in the real world are both uncontroverisal.\n\nThe only point of extensively discussing IQ differences between races(since any individual can drastically differ) is an attempt to create a racist society. IQ probably also differs between tall and short people, but nobody seems to be talking about that, because there's no one's trying to create a heightist society.", "438" ], [ "Not at all. After controlling for variables like academic performance, legacy status, social class, type of high school (public or private) and participation in athletics(most of which also benefit wrote students) an Indian or Asian still has to get over 140 more in their SAT and the difference in their ACT is almost as high as vs white over black. \n\nFrom NYT:\n\n > Often-cited examples of race-blind meritocracy are New York City’s elite public schools, such as Stuyvesant High School, for which admission is based solely on a standardized test. Stuyvesant is about 74 percent Asian, 18 percent white, 3 percent Hispanic, 1 percent black, with 4 percent multiracial or other\n\n_URL_0_\n\nCompare that to an elite university that is majority white and you'll know who the largest beneficiaries of affirmative acton at top universities are. \n\nIf admissions were race blind all top universities like the ivies stanford and MIT would be filled with asians, and in STEM fields they'll be over 90%. In raw numbers for top unis white people benefit more from affirmative action than any other race.", "205" ], [ "> but doing this most effectively is by looking at your own wrong-doings first and foremost. Thus there seems to be a value of effectivity.\n\nThis is not true. \n\n<PERSON> repeats this a number of times, but he operates on what he calls 'an elementary moral principle': You are responsible for your actions, not that of others. In democratic societies, citizens can influence the policy of their own state, not others. \n\nHe uses the example of Soviet dissidents: They would criticise the USSR, and when the commissars would say \"what about america, there's so much wrong there why not point that out instead of your own country?\" the dissidents would say that they neither knew or cared about America, they were concerned with the crimes of their own state. They were of course unanimously praised in the US for this, all <PERSON> says is that the same standard should apply to US dissidents. \n\nThis sums it up:\n_URL_0_", "593" ], [ "Interesting that you talk about the Kurds being slaughtered by \"Syria and Russia\" when the primary aggressors against the Kurds in the region have been Turkey, a longtime US ally.\n\nAs the Kurds themselves say, they have no allies except the mountains. Temporary alliances form but they are quickly discarded when not useful anymore, like when the Kurds trusted the US to defend them against the Shah of Iran, and the US sold them out, leading to a huge massacre. \n\n15 years back people were using the Kurds and <PERSON> to justify the biggest war crime of the 21st century in iraq, which I assume you still strongly support based on your line of reasoning about the Kurds and despotic rulers. The vietnam war too, involved similar rhetoric. Anyone opposed to the Iraq war was called anti-american, to the Vietnam war 'communist' and now I suppose the terminology these days is 'russian bot'", "819" ], [ "Point of these programs is to have diversity and have a college demographic similar to society at large. The minorities targeted are \"under-respresented minorities\" - black and hispanic. Again, like the new york school I mentioned(which are completely race blind), if the top 10-20 schools were truly race and need blind, in the prestigious programs it would be 70-80% east asian and indian. \n\nWithout legacy admissions, university policies would benefit black and hispanic students while putting white and asian students at a disadvantage(asian students much more than white at the top universities). With legacy admissions, university admissions favour white students followed by black and hispanic.\n\n It's very obvious if you look at the scores, GPA and admission rates that the majority(conservatively, probably 70%) of white students wouldn't have gotten into good programs at the top 20 universities if they were indian or chinese. But all the focus is on the few black people who make it, with people arguing many of them wouldn't make it if they were white(true, but then most white people at those universities made it because they were not asian).", "205" ], [ "Star Trek is basically fully automated luxury space communism by the way, and it's a straw man to claim that people think \"capitalism will fail because people will realise communism is more appealing\" - I've neve heard anyone serious say that. \n\nAlso blockchains bringing us to utopia, lol", "571" ], [ "The phrase 'Manufacturing Consent' was coined by <PERSON>, the 'father of modern journalism' who also coined 'cold war', 'stereotype' and believed the media should 'guide' rather than inform the masses.\n\nThe media according to the propaganda model, does not have a 'conservative' or 'liberal' bent, but a point of view that serves powerful interests. This is why the \"liberal\" new york times(incidentally run as a nepotistic family business) has supported every major war from Vietnam to Iraq. Individual journalists may have anti-power opinions, but they either learn early on that this is not compatible with making a successful career - and internalise the values that are needed to make it to the top, or they are censored, like when <PERSON> wanted to be critical of the Iraq War but the NYT wanted to stay 'in mainstream opinion' and not be too critical of it: _URL_1_\n\nIf you don't have time to watch a full documentary or read the book, go through this youtube playlist: _URL_0_\n\nOr for further discussion with people familiar with the model, visit r/<PERSON>", "840" ], [ "Reminds me of a BBC interview that <PERSON> had where he talked about the propaganda model. <PERSON>, the interviewer and one of the BBC's highest paid writers, didn't even know what COINTELPRO was, and was highly skeptical of everything <PERSON> was saying. One segment went like this:\n\n<PERSON>: \"How can you know I’m self-censoring?”\n\n<PERSON>: “I’m not saying you’re self-censoring, I’m sure you believe everything you say. But what I’m saying is if you believed something different you wouldn’t be sitting where you’re sitting.”\n\n...to which <PERSON> had no response. Years later when he was asked about the interview and that response, this is what <PERSON> said: \n\n > When he suggested that \"if you believed something different, you wouldn't be sitting where you're sitting\", I immediately realised that this was not so much brilliant, as unanswerable. He comes quite close to the position that the propaganda model means \"everybody who disagrees with me\". And the conversation was taking place in the context of me expressing disbelief, in his view, that all mainstream journalists were essentially the same - I had said that **it seemed to me the Guardian and the Telegraph posed very different world views.**", "840" ], [ "<PERSON> wants women to be hanged for abortion and <PERSON> cannot distinguish between real and parody accounts on Twitter, using a painfully obvious fake right wing antifa account which literally mocks antifa in their pinned tweet as main evidence for her point about antifa. This was somehow allowed by the editors of the NYT", "294" ], [ "> We don't take many refugees at all from Saudi, Pakistan or Afghanistan\n\nDo we take so many refugees from Iran and the other countries on that list apart from Syria and Iraq? \n\n > While we develope a stronger vetting process\n\nOur current vetting process has let in tens of thousands of refugees, none of whom have committed any major crime. Also none of these countries have ever had a citizen who carried out an attack on US soil, while people from Saudi, Pakistan and Afghanistan carried out 9/11.\n\nAlso what on earth is the rationale for preventing permanent residents from entering the country?", "296" ], [ "The OSU attacker was born in Somalia but came through Pakistan, and also nobody other than him died in his attack, so it was not major, just notable because it was a Muslim attacker. \n\n > according to reports that was 6 people on one flight from Cairo\n\nI wish, but Air Canada have also released a statement saying they cannot allow green card holders from these countries to enter the US, and other sources from elsewhere agree. These people have stayed here for more than a decade in many cases and have families in the US.", "296" ], [ "> It's not as bad or radical\n\nYeah, it's from the whitehouse. What do you expect? Torture is \"enhanced interrogation\", bombing hospitals is \"collateral damage\". They're not going to put out \"Muslim ban\", but that's what it is. \n\nIn a country with incredible levels of inequality and a broken helthcare system, where children still go starving, they focus on something completely irrelevant to divide the people. Banning refugees when they've never committed a serious attack. Building a wall when immigration from Mexico is dropping like a rock. They talk about 9/11 while exempt the countries which funded and still harbour terrorists. They want to talk about safety but don't even want to pass background checks before getting guns. \n\n > In addition, the United States should not admit those who engage in acts of bigotry or hatred ..... other forms of violence against women, or the persecution of those who practice religions different from their own\n\nIf only they would apply that standard to their own president.", "296" ], [ "...which will lead to even more regulations against immigration. I'm sure that's what <PERSON> wants:\n\nKeep people talking about immigration, crime and race while he gets admitted to ultra high level security briefings and fulfils his admitted ambition of destroying the state, or at least setting up a system where the state is essentially functionally worthless and a small few at the very top control all aspects of society. \n\nNot mentioning Jews during the holocaust statement has <PERSON> written all over it. He was also the one who apparently stated the law also applies to Green card holders. <PERSON> controls <PERSON>, and is consequently de facto leader of the world now, I wish I was being hyperbolic.", "799" ], [ "50 years from now people will ask what your position was, and how you responded to what's happening these days. I hope most people can say they didn't just sit back and carry on because it didn't affect them directly until it was too late. I hope people say they woke up, exercised their democratic rights by voting and protesting and threw out <PERSON> and every single politician who's not outraged by what he's been doing.", "134" ], [ "Yeah, I'm aware. But it's like the constitution guaranteeing equal rights to \"All men\" when it in reality excluded everybody but white men, and for many years even poor white men. \n\nBut still, it was an ideal to strive towards that eventually led, centuries later, to equal rights for blacks and women. \n\nNobody is arguing for millions to be let in. But the US is largely responsible for the instability in the middle east that has destroyed so many people's lives. If you're not going to use those words in times like these, they are utterly worthless. Which they possibly are.", "1020" ], [ "These are just a few I can get in a few seconds, but there are a LOT more:\n\n- Those who are most sensitive about \"politically incorrect\" terminology are not the average black ghetto-dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any \"oppressed\" group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual, white males from middle-class families.\n\n- Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals), or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit it to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not suggest that women, Indians, etc., ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology).\n\n- Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.\n\n- Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist's real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.\n\nI'm not joking when I say the unabomber would be a legend if he posted on T_D", "965" ], [ "<PERSON> has said he's trying to be the rational voice and try to convince <PERSON> that certain issues are important. His position is that it's best to try to influence <PERSON> rather than leave him be to wreck havoc. \n\n<PERSON> is doing a couple of important things - building the worlds largest factory(and transitioning cars to electric) and trying to make space flight affordable - both of which rely on government subsidies, and both of which could collapse if <PERSON> wants. He doesn't have much of a choice really.", "771" ], [ "> On average, we are getting about 80,000 page views every day\n\nInterestingly the overall traffic has declined pretty dramatically since last year. We used to get 4-5 million pageviews a month in the second half of last season but it's now barely crossing 2 million this season, even when we were doing well in November-December. \n\n_URL_0_\n\nThis is actually not unique to this sub. I've been following this for a while, and r/soccer and many other major clubs are also declining in pageviews and uniques compared to last year, despite their subscriber count increasing. Either people are leaving Reddit(unlikely) or don't care about football anymore. I know people blame the falling viewing figures on the use of illegal streaming sites, but maybe people are just tired of all the insane money and manufactured drama in the PL these days. It's not what it used to be.", "423" ], [ "The primary concern for the US(or any major state) is hegemony - control or influence over the state. This means the state has to either be de facto dependant on the US or be relatively stable(instability cause the US to lose control over the region). The's why the US funded <PERSON> - they could count on him early on, but by 2003 he was too independent and had to be taken down. \n\nIf you look through that prism most decisions will make sense. <PERSON> is from a neoliberal right-wing party that is friendly(relatively speaking) to US business interests and Honduras is comparatively today more 'stable'(read: not likely to have a people's revolution) than Guatemala. In Guatemala the situation is not looking good at all. At this point, the US probably judges that the best hope for 'stability' is removing the sitting party/president and replacing them with an approved alternative.", "308" ], [ "The business *is* in trouble right now, which could explain his tweet rants - he's never before tweeted as much as he has in the last few weeks. \n\nThis is undoubtedly Tesla's worst period since 2008, with one exception: back then they could've been bought out since they were a small company. But now they're worth 50 billion, Apple's teamed up with Volkswagen, Alphabet has Waymo and Softbank invested in GM/Cruise. No one is there to save them now. \n\nIt's going to either be the greatest escape in business history or collapse. I don't see anything in-between. \n\nThe only thing that has taken Tesla so far is <PERSON> promises and marketing : any other sane founder/CEO would have kept Tesla a niche company. Insanity ends in failure 99% of the time, but that 1% chance could change everything.", "49" ], [ "Space X is a private company so not much is known. They are much more stable than Tesla, and I seriously doubt they will help Tesla out since they are in a business with razor thin margins. \n\nAlso they were supposed to send some people to the moon this year but that was quietly canceled. \n\nI really see a < 1% chance of a Mars Base. Aside from technology they need huge amount of capital for that, not enough from just launching satellites. Only chance is if Tesla wildly takes off and becomes worth 700 billion(according to <PERSON> compensation plan he would then be worth twice as much as <PERSON> now)", "74" ], [ "1) I totally agree with the board. <PERSON> should not have been fired from chairman because he's the main reason they're afloat and even big in the first place. \n\n2) The companies that hold the stock do so because they believe two things: Tesla will raise billions this year, and production rate will reach 10k in a few quarters. \n\nThe next 6 months are crucial. If tesla don't do either the investors will start selling. If tesla manages one of the two, they should be good for another 6-9 months.", "49" ], [ "1)10k to justify long term sustainability and the current valuation. 5k to stay alive. \n\n2)Tesla have literally done this multiple times before. Generally it's not a good idea to state that you need to raise money(makes it seem like you're in a bad situation and temporarily hurts stocks) and stockholders know that <PERSON> has done this before. \n\nGenerally, Tesla announce a new project and say they need money for that after previously saying they don't need to raise money", "49" ], [ "Yeah people are usually aware of the story. If tesla go bankrupt they've still \"won\" because their original goal was to 'advance the advent of electric cars'. \n\nBut, you have to be critical and ask if this was the best way to do it: billions in public subsidies for luxury cars, horrible worker conditions and tons of carbon emissions.\n\nThe best way to combat global warming is actually not selling people more(electric) cars but encouraging and improving public transportation.", "49" ], [ "I am a CS student as well. If you're talking about FSD(as I was) the consensus indeed is that a vision-based and radar system is not on the verge of a breakthrough in the next few years. But maybe you're a PhD and working on something most people don't know yet. But one thing's inarguable: all the money and funding is going into LIDAR enabled cars(Tesla is not and doesn't have the hardware for it), that's why Uber and Waymo are testing self driving fleets and Tesla isn't. \n\nAre you seriously saying Tesla is going to achieve FSD before Waymo? I doubt even <PERSON> would say that. Here's an article on a recent study that compared all exiting self driving systems: _URL_0_", "49" ], [ "Your article literally states the opposite:\n\n > But it won’t be, argues <PERSON>, a professor at the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business. The margins on the Model 3 must still pay for a cost structure that legacy carmakers don’t have, including planned factory expansions, new automation investments, and its own dealership network. While Tesla has its own advantages, like integrated solar and energy storage products and no costly pension liabilities, the company is counting on fat gross margins of 25% to stay in the black. (Ford by contrast has 10% margins.)", "49" ], [ "I didn't expect this to blow up and now I'm regretting it. I originally wrote this to show to people already aware and agreeing on these facts to get their opinion on what to add/remove and how to change it(you can see a post I made 2 weeks back). \n\nMost of this is sourced from quarterly earnings statements (available online) and public statements and analysis. \n\nIt's very late here, I'm on mobile and I didn't expect this to blow up. as there were 1000s of comments when I posted. But I will have this fully-sourced this weekend and edit the comment. \n\nIf you're interested in more discussion r/RealTesla is a good place. Quite a few knowledgeable people there, though like any sub you have to wade through nonsense,", "49" ], [ "I've not shorted any tesla stock because I'm a university student and I've never invested in stocks before. I was interested in Tesla and a few months ago began extensively researching them and diving get deep into their finances. \n\nI'm not fully happy with the entire text because some parts are overly speculative/negative and some negative points havent been mentioned. But I think it does an OK job of summarizing the bear position that most people never hear.", "49" ], [ "Unless you can get into Renaissance or something Index funds will out-perform hedge funds on average(after accounting for fees). So if you don't have time to research every stock you invest just put most of it in an Index fund. You can usually withdraw 4% from that forever, so if you have your yearly living expenses * 25 in different index funds would mean you can retire. \n\nI'm not a trader, as I mentioned in my comment. But unless you have the time to do it full time, index funds are the way to go.", "507" ], [ "Hmm there's no real single source I'm afraid. Follow the news everyday, read quarterly reports, etc. There's some good people at r/RealTesla who are much more experienced than me with market analysis and they post well researched comments that I learn from(and the threads after quarterly reports are great to identify where and how tesla and other companies paper over cracks in their reports). Seeking Alpha's quality varies *very* much but you do find the occasional great article from them.", "49" ], [ "2500 is the last officially reported number, and it was a burst rate so useless - real rate over quarter was much less. They \"expect\" 5k by the end of this quarter(also expected that in 2017) but that's also likely to be a burst rate(one time increase rather than consistent 5k a week)\n\n_URL_0_\n\n > <PERSON>, a professor at the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business: The margins on the Model 3 must still pay for a cost structure that legacy carmakers don’t have, including planned factory expansions, new automation investments, and its own dealership network. While Tesla has its own advantages, like integrated solar and energy storage products and no costly pension liabilities, the company is counting on fat gross margins of 25% to stay in \nthe black. (Ford by contrast has 10% margins.)\n\nCompetion to tesla isn't the Bolt but, at the 48k model 3 average selling price the competion is lower end Audi, Mercedes, BMW, etc. All coming out with their first mainstream no-compromise electric in the next 12 months.", "49" ], [ "Skeleton Tree by <PERSON> and The Bad Seeds is the best rock album to come out last year, IMO\n\nOther than that, good rock albums I can think of right now, that came out after 2008 are:\n\n- Wasting Light by Foo Fighters\n\n- A Moon Shaped Pool by Radiohead\n\n- <PERSON> by Arcade Fire\n\n- Terror by The Flaming Lips\n\n- <PERSON> by <PERSON>\n\n- <PERSON> by <PERSON>\n\nFrank Ocean's Blonde isn't technically rock, but it has a very experimental vibe to it and is certainly one of the best albums of the last few years.", "464" ], [ "No, because 65 million people voted for <PERSON>, and they share responsibility for all his actions. The proportion of people who would've voted for <PERSON> but instead voted for <PERSON> is a rounding error. \n\nMaybe more people would've come out in the rust belt states if <PERSON> was the candidate. Nobody can know for sure, but that doesn't change the fact that millions of people voted for <PERSON> and agree with most of what he says. \n\nYou can't really shift the blame away from the people, especially when it's not like Republicans are less corrupt than democrats(Assuming corruption is what made them vote Trump- which is laughable in in itself).", "92" ], [ "What I find most interesting and ironic, is that climate change is going to lead to mass migrations of the kind that we've never witnessed before, and millions and millions of new refugees. \n\nSo you'd expect, in an ordinary world, that people opposed to migration and refugees will be at the forefront of environmentalism, because if things become worse, very quickly the current migrant crisis will look like a trailer to a full length feature film. \nBut the people who dislike refugees are also the people who are very often vehemently opposed to taking steps to prevent climate change. It's bizarre. \n\nEdit: There's a reason the pentagon classifies climate change as a threat to national security. Here's a [relevant article](_URL_0_). \"Climate change is set to cause a refugee crisis of “unimaginable scale”, according to senior military figures, who warn that global warming is the greatest security threat of the 21st century and that mass migration will become the “new normal”.\"", "687" ], [ "It's still not an acceptable view. There's going to be global instability, more war and the threat of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of an unstable state reeling from climate disaster. The quality of life in such a situation will be worse for almost everyone. \n\nAnd what are you going to say when people from Bangladesh ask why they should be the ones to pay with their homes and livelihood when the average American family of 4 has a larger carbon footprint than 80 people in India? \n\nNobody benefits from this.", "637" ], [ "> he rich have parachutes like heavily fortified and plentifully stocked bunkers. They'll avoid the migration problems\n\nYes. But they are the top .01%, not the millions who don't want to do anything with climate change and dislike refugees. \n\n > some people want bring about the apocalypse because it is god's will\n\nWhich is why I think fundamentalist thinking is dangerous regardless of religion. ISIS is horrific of course, but the US has a cult of people who believe that the end of times is something to be welcome, and these people are very close to the top and make decisions.", "690" ], [ "I don't remember the first time I heard of <PERSON>, but his name always came up in the mainstream media with adjectives like \"controversial\" and \"anti-American\", but they also usually conceded in one or another that he was an intellectual titan. I didn't grow up in a liberal or left wing environment- far from it, so the idea that the US could be anything other than the 'good guys' was something that never even crossed my mind. Sure, US foreign policy made a lot of mistakes, but they always had 'good intentions', right?\n\nThe first time I actually heard what <PERSON> had to say was in the <PERSON> debate. To be honest, I thought <PERSON> was unnecessarily rude in that exchange, but the point he made about intentions caught my attention, because I'd never thought of it that way. Then I saw some of videos on YouTube, realised he was saying things that were radically different from how I'd always seen the world, and backing it up with evidence. I read a couple of books he did with <PERSON>, and Necessary Illusions. \n\nIt's a surreal experience, having everything you ever believed in crumble before your eyes. I recall reading a while back <PERSON> describing how he'd first come across <PERSON>. His experiences were strikingly similar to mine, though he'd come across <PERSON> when he was a year older than when I did. I think that might warrant it's own post, so I'll do that.", "520" ], [ "<PERSON> is a stain on them, but I think they still perform a very important role in general. There are many, many kids and teenagers in fundamentalist households who view the world in a completely different way because of them. \n\nThe usual criticism of the new atheists is that they take on the easy targets- the creationists and fundamentalists. But in a world where more people in the US believe in Angels(77%) than in evolution(51%), you can't just pretend that the majority doesn't exist. There needs to be people calling out ludicrous BS as ludicrous BS, even if more important problems exist in the world. Criticism of religion is crucial to challenging existing power structures.", "129" ], [ "I understand *why* <PERSON> was rude, I just don't think it was the right tactic, in particular employing phrases like 'sorry for the accuracy' and 'as you well know', while also interpreting his silences as evasions and 'setting a trap' by asking him to show him what he'd written about <PERSON>. Since <PERSON> made it clear from the outset that he intended to publish the dialogue, it was clear that <PERSON> wasn't only speaking to <PERSON> but all his readers as well. \n\nThe fact is that <PERSON> occupies an extreme minority position on the political spectrum. He happens to be right about most issues, but he's still on the fringe. If <PERSON> is an apologist(which he probably is), then so is > 95% of the population, especially if you consider the sky high approval ratings of drone strikes, for example. But <PERSON> at least acknowledges the tremendous atrocities committed by the US in the past, most of which he agrees are unjustifiable: that alone makes him(and his readers) more open to reason than the majority of the population, who don't even think that the US has committed terror, who think Vietnam was a mistake because 'we' didn't win and don't care about the sanctions or Iraq in the 90s.\n\nWhen it comes to convincing thousands of <PERSON> readers about important issues, the matter of rhetoric becomes a moral issue. <PERSON> could have well expressed his disdain for <PERSON>'s views without, say, berating him for not retracting his statement before even the second email and before <PERSON> could properly respond to the things <PERSON> was saying.", "308" ], [ "I don't think this even addresses much of what I said. Or if it does, it misrepresents my point. For example\n\n > The amount of people who believe and support something doesnt mean theres any evidence for it or that its rational or its not that bad \n\nI never implied that that was the case, in fact I stated the opposite:\n\n > He[Chomsky] happens to be right about most issues\n\nBut since there's a misunderstanding I'll reiterate my points more clearly. \n\n1)I understand *why* <PERSON> was angry, and agree with him that to even discuss some of these things is to lose one's humanity. \n\n2)Nevertheless, <PERSON>'s position on most things in politics is a minority one, and many lives are lost because more people don't share his views.\n\n3)Therefore, <PERSON>'s aim should be to convince the maximum number of people of the reality of the world, and state terror in particular, in order to spread awareness and reduce suffering. This is my main point.\n\n4)Since <PERSON> made it clear at the outset that he would be publishing the conversation, <PERSON> knew that this wouldn't merely be a private correspondence, where he might have been justified in being as dismissive as he was. \n\n5)Thus, since thousands of readers who don't necessarily have strong or fixed political views would go on to read the exchange, either <PERSON> should have refused to discuss anything with <PERSON> at all - and stated his reasons for doing so(that <PERSON> was an apologist and we shouldn't debate these things), or, having agreed to discuss his views, he should have focussed on the issues themselves rather than distracting from them by attacking <PERSON>, making assumptions about his silence, etc.\n\nMy criticism is purely tactical: that there is no benefit from agreeing to discuss(and therefore saying the person is worth discussing with) and then not having a proper discussion. \n\nSide note: good point about the vietnam war, I had forgotten about that poll. But that came after so many American lives - most poor or middle class, were lost. But I think the point still stands. <PERSON>, for example, is widely loved by the public despite being the one to start the war.", "414" ], [ "Yup, honestly 90% of YouTube tech reviewers are clickbait bullshiters in it for the money first and actual quality reviews second. \n\nThe only two channels I know which don't resort to clickbait titles, misleading thumbnails with question marks or arrows, etc. are FlossyCarter and DetroitBorg. Both just start out by unboxing the product with no fancy intro or music, and both spend time talking about the nitty gritty details. They don't dumb it down too much either, which is a problem amongst big YouTubers like MKBHD.", "999" ] ]
462
[ 10980, 15628, 23805, 7002, 14118, 3931, 4280, 25052, 11923, 24060, 17507, 25523, 22886, 695, 6702, 13617, 14520, 2287, 18067, 23117, 20442, 21140, 4347, 15268, 8311, 14668, 25455, 20261, 8617, 24699, 22801, 270, 22795, 63, 6259, 441, 6256, 24407, 12096, 10761, 3028, 23928, 24832, 24836, 23467, 18121, 3985, 3757, 21148, 22034, 736, 3159, 13613, 20507, 892, 21755, 12361, 19200, 11066, 18024, 11513, 266, 22495, 21680, 3029, 25154, 3988, 1535, 18414, 20463, 24083, 24854, 24213, 4243, 7271, 4488, 21400, 1649, 7036, 19760, 19708, 16344, 13752, 13126, 5264, 1499, 21847, 13729, 18575, 22816, 926, 2783, 7502, 6499, 5519, 13822, 12999, 4162, 4345, 22337, 21090, 4645, 10280, 20872, 9395, 21932, 7028, 21347, 16249, 8077, 25021, 4441, 21643, 16495, 24067, 25073, 22424, 7574, 2304, 19148, 20177, 22798, 12933, 13413, 1884, 17349, 23095, 16152, 5037, 11191, 7211, 4848, 82, 1239, 917, 2484, 10196, 14821, 22072, 15098, 5136, 5667, 18093, 13238, 14455, 3223, 23856, 10593, 14863, 5905, 16019, 15885, 22012, 2760, 13122, 22062, 42, 16792, 10097, 3470, 20039, 16569, 17997, 10040, 22720, 286, 21992, 22117, 8246, 6704, 19610, 11656, 9745, 5901, 13768, 11143, 21183, 13749, 21492, 5107, 8541, 15009, 7712, 10432, 10694, 9239, 8416, 16979, 17666, 3818, 9115, 6642, 12553, 16524, 1475, 10346, 18477, 16124, 10538, 19441, 17236, 5185, 4779, 3002, 17805, 11409, 4707, 593, 23914, 2895, 5824, 22235, 19135, 2774, 8758, 25226, 12359, 25124, 7838, 7634, 18274, 132, 2275, 20983, 16744, 275, 24538, 24771, 10362, 4910, 9907, 13646, 14235, 25251, 11422, 18756, 11056, 2507, 11130, 612, 2583, 17493, 15509, 3019, 499, 12129, 21104, 21111, 5997, 11692, 6406, 7543, 24009, 21545, 16781, 4835, 16256, 7629, 7400, 24575, 14844, 5835, 8273, 9180, 8248, 9110, 13777, 15413, 4366, 21433, 9525, 4314, 13629, 9577, 12417, 19244, 19301, 3045, 5996, 414, 8017, 7925, 13363, 17028, 18682, 11834, 7930, 19592, 12598, 12159, 25541, 12937, 18175, 1062, 15842, 20331, 20488, 7474, 22489, 15916, 4547, 1949, 19998, 3466, 12059, 16031, 14241, 16666, 2277, 150, 17212, 8221, 18999, 17790, 8207, 6175, 18167, 18234, 14949, 23029, 1708, 13551, 4783, 23163, 7331, 11431, 6891, 14527, 2145, 11473, 20950, 12509, 22334, 24355, 5394, 22586, 24568, 15477, 23074, 24006, 2223, 13, 16936, 13398, 15689, 21924, 8674, 20578, 15223, 23764, 1188, 22567, 17200, 1907, 3614, 15085, 2426, 22187, 3467, 23523, 3172, 13673, 16830, 12579, 16711, 23812, 460, 19023, 21064, 14177, 10429, 24895, 19779, 3831, 4614, 12800, 10151, 18705, 20962, 23418, 14819, 12938, 22268, 15882, 1302, 17234, 12755, 10199, 20157, 2230, 3229, 24311, 11456, 5272, 3117, 24390, 6402, 822, 2489, 22930, 757, 6587, 8777, 6590, 7516, 22444, 23860, 668, 6146, 20076, 11496, 19885, 22967, 8116, 24921, 7155, 14111, 15019, 5040, 13453, 16978, 5162, 14663, 21843, 3646, 8533, 18272, 20649, 250, 24961, 15963, 22807, 25508, 10621, 24962, 19178, 5727, 11322, 12215, 10, 5761, 22684, 23351, 21723, 13778, 15135, 24844, 24948, 13500, 3413, 8108, 7209, 3637, 11565, 16035, 12888, 20991, 9372, 15974, 22124, 8325, 8743, 20193, 25178, 16902, 7509, 7899, 9293, 10970, 2467, 18737, 6335, 8386, 11351, 20828, 13780, 15787, 1057, 18489, 16461, 10672, 25536, 7695, 21664, 24085, 24870, 17547, 3809, 18749, 21832, 10896, 25334, 7738, 12420, 17132, 12527, 11395, 11315, 19305 ]
reddit_dump_-_Annyeong_-
[ [ "Yeah I have to say I was absolutely stunned they lasted this long. They make perfect sense in European cities where turning circle, sight lines and a small footprint can be critical but in the U.S. our infrastructure makes them a style over substance car. They're just too much of a compromise when a Toyota Corolla etc. is just THAT much more practical and the size isn't a huge detriment.", "93" ], [ "I actually had a Miata and looked at a Fiat and, you're right, it's far more usable but compared to a 4 door Civic, Jetta or Corolla which could be had for about the same cost you're giving up on a lot of space, MPG and highway comfort. \n\n\nIt's a wonderful car but it just doesn't make sense for the US outside of very specific markets that are better served by public transit anyway.", "93" ], [ "I used to despise crossovers but when I was looking for a car for my wife the XC40 or Cx-5 was basically perfect. Comfortable, good amount of room and, most importantly, it's easy to get a toddler in and out. Kid seats are heavy (maybe 35 lbs.) and pulling them out of my wagon absolutely sucks as you need to pull then up and out vs. Just slide them. She doesn't care at all about sporty but cares about a small footprint, great sight lines, MPG, safety, and comfort. Minivans and SUVs are just too big to park here and MPVs are either too big or work van based so safety kit and NVH isolation aren't great. \n\nShes the average car buyer and I'm absolutely not. If I didnt care about sporty I would have definitely bagged a CUV. Fight me!", "93" ], [ "I had an 08 Camry Hybrid and, as an appliance, it was far and away the best car I've ever owned. That car took me on a month long road trip through the US through snowstorms and LV heat and never once had a hiccup. Got me through high school and college where I was commuting 2 hrs. A day and a long distance GF requiring 4 hour trips every weekend. Kept me safe and sound in 3 car accidents. It was just unbelievably comfortable and great on gas for such a big car. \n\nI finally sold it because it stopped making sense when it needed a good amount of work (wear items like all 4 brakes, suspension was original etc.) and the batteries started their decline at 212k miles. I sold it for 6k USD even after telling the new owner what it needed. I bought a Miata instead which turned into a maintenance nightmare (I suspect flood damage) Best and worst trade ever. \n\nIt had 1 issue outside of wear items ever, a fuel filler neck installed at the dealer for 900 USD at 170k miles. That's it...Seriously that's it. Toyota earned their reputation and if I ever need an appliance again I know what dealer in headed to.", "352" ], [ "I stayed at a nice hotel in Boston once and they parked my freshly washed and waxed, lowered Miata on Enkei wheels out front. It was insane seeing it next to a 911 turbo, a Bentley and a Ferrari. I have to admit I was kind of proud thinking it was a draw for the hotel. When I asked why they immediately peered down their noses and said \"it's a clean convertible that looks sporty and no one knows the difference...\" ugh I was crushed. I felt like I'd just been negged.", "93" ], [ "I knew a guy who was a rabid Porsche fan and he would have maybe 8-10 different 911s at a given time. He said it was because he could never choose interior/exterior colours and options so he just ordered 3-4 at a time on the same day and after a year or 2 would trade in the ones he didn't want. There would be 3-4 modern 911s and then single older models in very used condition like a 70s Targa or 993. When I last saw him he was dailying a 930 Turbo with 160k miles on it. Looked like shit but was mechanically flawless. \n\nFucking totally bizarre. The guy had diagnosed OCD and extreme fuck you money. If you're looking for a reason I'm at a loss but it sure made him happy.", "54" ], [ "They actually told me they were warrantied until 100K but would like die around 150K. At the time I was concerned gas prices would hit $4-5 and thought I'd sell around 120K so this was OK by me. There was a significant drop off in MPG at about 190K miles (from avg. 38 mixed to 34 at best and avg. 32). The winter were also super hard on MPG as well and that got worse as the car aged. When I drove across the country I had no issue getting 35-36 in the south but up north I was doing about 31-32 through cold flat ass Nebraska.\n\nComparing my ROUGH overall average of 38 MPG to my friends 07 which averaged 31 I saved about $3K over 212k miles. This is definitely not perfect math as I'm trying to average historical gas prices (which were far lower), our driving habits etc. but if I had to do it over I'd gotten the non hybrid and I probably would have driven it into the ground at 280k.", "352" ], [ "This is either a fantastic hoax or terrifying. Reminds me of the time my friends and I came home from the bar and my friend dialed his shortwave radio in the kitchen to a Spanish numbers stations. Just a series of numbers read over the air. I've seen scary movies but nothing made me as uneasy as that damn broadcast. what is it for? Who is the intended audience?", "443" ], [ "*The selection and presentation of advertising and other promotional material are, of course, the responsibility of licensees. However, in this selection process, licensees should take into account, under the public interest standard, possible hazards to the public.* ***Accordingly, in making decisions as to acceptability of commercial and other announcements, licensees should be aware of possible adverse consequences of the use of sirens and other alarming sound effects.***  \n\n\n\\-Per the FCC \n\n\nBasically it's not illegal but generally frowned upon like masturbating on an airplane.", "903" ], [ "> Motherfucker fired the guy who said inviting the Taliban onto US soil near the anniversary of 9/11 was a bad idea. Let that shit sink in. How low can the MAGA cultists go to still support this fuck.\n\nThis is the comment started all of this. I was simply saying that taking a shot at <PERSON> is stupid at this moment when boltons firing is fantastic news. I absolutely hate <PERSON> but in this instance I'll say I agree with <PERSON> in firing that absolute animal <PERSON>. I despise <PERSON> but I *really* despise <PERSON>.", "272" ], [ "Do not listen to this idiot. If the medical personnel truly did not explain the test properly it's not fair for you to pay again. The person above has obviously never been a patient for this type of test or been a person to explain the test. It's not just \"pooping in a cup!\" Even a urine sample can be improperly done if the patient is not told how to clean the area etc. I have explained this type of tests hundreds of times and it's important to always have the patient tell YOU the steps after you explain. Theres no use in wasting time and money.", "723" ], [ "You could say its sexist to get your husband a nice coffee thermos, tool set, expensive suit, or fancy briefcase and pen for work but no one ever does right? Work is their hobby right? \n\nAs a stay at home dad it drives me crazy when people try and call it sexist without acknowledging the obvious double standard.", "139" ], [ "If you listened to a problem in her life and found something that would help her you did NOTHING wrong. You literally got her an expensive thing that she was asking for...\n\nI complained about cleaning the floors and my wife got me a vacuum and it made me super happy. It solved an issue in my life and was an extremely thoughtful gift. She listened to my issue and solved it. No one ever complains when a woman gets a man a nice briefcase for work or a new drill so don't listen to their obvious bias.", "710" ], [ "It's totally your money but it's a warning sign to him. An S1 is a very expensive car and he knows your finances may one day be joined if you stay together. If you're so set on buying something so expensive and can't be talked back it's a bad sign when it becomes both of your incomes on the line. If you plan on staying together the debts you accrue now may as well be his. If he is a car guy and doesn't want you getting an S1 theres a big part of this story you're not telling us. \n\nMy ex talked about how she was going into an extremely low paying career field but would be taking about 300k worth of student loans out and not work for 6 years. I told her it made no sense and it was a terrible choice but she could not be talked back. She said \"But it's my money!\" I knew this same convo would happen when we bought cars together, bought a house together and when we saved. That was enough for me to leave honestly.", "312" ], [ "I'm a stay at home dad and got a vacuum for my birthday. My wife heard me complain (as OPs wife did) and bought me something to help me. She listened to me, acknowledged my unspoken request and solved my issue. That's the definition of a thoughtful gift but society tells us it's sexist somehow? Is my wife an asshole? No? Then neither is <PERSON> for doing literally the same thing.\n\nMy guy friends always get work related gifts like fancy pens, briefcase or home repair stuff like drills and tools. They never complain because society tells us that's what men get for gifts.", "710" ], [ "Depends how long you're planning to own it really. My view was find the car size I need for the time I'm owning it then sort out all options. \n\nNot to get off topic but if you're doing well and plan on keeping it a longer time I'd personally buy a certified pre owned car. Leasing is expensive and you're just buying depreciation. If you buy used you typically get a warranty if its certified and you enter an entirely new market. I got my fully loaded C43 with a warranty and 18k miles for about the same price as a new loaded S1. A used S3 would fall right into your price range if you choose used it's faster and much nicer inside than the Golf R too!", "352" ], [ "OK yeah sorry I am doing a few things at once so I don't have too much time to reply and maybe I was unclear (sorry!) let me try and get everything out at once vs. peace meal.\n\n\\-People claim <PERSON> is sexist as he bought his wife a vacuum. I disagree, she was VERY literally asking for it and it is an expensive gift that is quite thoughtful. It makes her life easier and I take a bit of offense to it being sexist as it's a gift I received and absolutely covet. I was ecstatic when I got it because it meant my wife was listening to what I was saying and wanted to help. People would never claim my wife is sexist for this gift even if I am a stay at home dad.\n\n\\-People claim a gift of a vacuum, regardless of whether or not she asked for it, is sexist because it involves societies idea of \"womens work.\" But people in general have no issue with a man receiving a briefcase, drill or suit because it's societies idea of \"Mans work.\" My friends never asked for these gifts but why is the connotation of \"Here, go do some more work.\" Why wouldn't the same logic of Vacuum=woman work=sexist apply here?\n\nWhat I am saying is she literally asked for the vacuum whereas my friends didn't ask for drills etc. so they have just as much reason to claim sexism as commentators here about OP if not more. No one really thinks about this same type of gift item in reverse. I am sticking up for <PERSON> because I think his wife is extremely rude to snub her nose at a gift that is genuinely thoughtful. So many guys walk into a jewelry store and grab the first thing they see without a second thought, I think getting a useful thoughtful gift means so much more.", "710" ], [ "A light bulb maybe be a few dollars but a hand held vacuum could be $250+. To me a better example would be if you asked for a lightbulb and your husband installed a full house phillips HUE system that (For this example) you'd also been asking for. This is how I view what happened but we could both be very wrong it's just how we interpret info OP provided. \n\nI don't agree he sucks hard here, I think he needs to work on communication but who couldn't? I just feel like it was a thoughtful gift but people keep claiming it isn't. Had he bought her a POS $50 vacuum than sure but, an expensive nice handheld one?", "885" ], [ "Yep, when they rolled it out I thought they'd lost their marbles. But I did some thinking about it...\n\n The S6 and S4 have always been the responsible choice against the M3/5 and the C/E63. But with the new lower spec AMG and M stuff coming out they are losing significant market share. MB and BMW never competed with a turbo 6 cylinder AWD sport tuned model from M and AMG so it's not surprising they may try and differentiate themselves again with diesel. It's a bold move but I don't believe the S6 (and maybe even S4) would live on after having fair competition that is significantly better as a sports car and they are no longer the only \"responsible\" choice. Instead of \"Well I want the E63 but I'll settle for the S6 as it's more reasonable\" people are just buying the E43 and loving it. The S6 diesel will win again when people start running the numbers of fuel costs, taxing and registration. Audi, in my opinion, has been VERY smart here. \n\nWouldn't surprise me entirely if the S4 went diesel as well as BMW and MB have eaten into their niche. I test drove the M340, C43 and S4 and the S4 finished dead last as it's a bit of a wet blanket. Not as sharp as the BMW M340 or as frantic and ridiculous as the MB C43. If the S4 went diesel it would have made my decision FAR more difficult when I looked at the ancillary costs here in Europe. Even 5 MPG more and cheaper gas makes a massive difference.", "393" ], [ "I drive the ultimately hated AMG (C43) and I'm perfectly happy. The M340 is also a fantastically fast and capable car and both are on par with the exalted S4 Avant so why wouldn't AMG and M try and break into a new market? \n\nFor the C200 AMG line it's just a sportier trim of the C class. For a lot of people they want a decent handling and sporty car without the added costs of an AMG engine they'll never use. \n\nI looked at a VRS and the 245 is a fairly quick wagon and it's on par with the GTD and Focus ST estate. No one knocks the GTD or Focus ST so why the vRS? \n\nThe problem with badge snobs is they have done nothing to build the name they pretend to care so much about. They haven't spent a single moment in the workshops, in the meeting rooms and marketing department. They try and sit themselves on high by throwing around buzzwords like brand dilution when they've never built a brand themselves. Its embarrassing.\n\nWhen Porsche built the Cayenne every badge snob moron hated it. Porsche gambled big on the Cayenne as without a sales hit Porsche was going tits up. If AMG or M wants to slap their name on a toaster to try and stay afloat it's their right.", "393" ], [ "Realistically these offers are for people who want their car immediately. If you were to order one they would spend 45 minutes explaining how long it would take and it could be 6 months. The Golf R is ONLY made in Wolfsburg and getting one here can be tricky. In Germany these cars are everywhere but in the US they are quite rare so to get one immediately is massively expensive.", "393" ], [ "I keep that cover in place about 90% of the time. I keep things like bug remover, a first aid kit etc. In the trunk and I have always feared those items going airborne in an accident. My kid sits rear facing so her face is only protected by the headrest but anything coming in at an angle is gonna cause problems. \n\nIt's a bit paranoid but not unfounded. In a relatively minor accident I had a CD case hit my friend with enough force to cause a nasty bruise. In a severe accident loose items become missiles.", "949" ], [ "Right sorry maybe I wasn't clear. American buyers typically but off the lot whereas all the Germans I know have been fine waiting months to pick up a car. The Golf R is quite rare in the US so off the lot they charge this ridiculous mark up.\n\nGetting it to the US is tricky because the dealer will want a hefty deposit to make sure they dont wind up with a difficult to move car. Not many Americans want a 40k Golf.", "565" ], [ "What's wrong? Didn't take enuff high school math?\n\nLets clarify his situation with some quick maths. 50k divided by three years is about $16.5k a year. I know people who spend 5k a year on fucking cigarettes and another 2k on coffee. If that's half his income (as he stated) he is making 32k a year. That's less than 16 an hour but he clearly states he is doing serious OT every week and likely getting 1.5. That means he is probably making AT MOST $11-12 an hour. That income is brutal if you have debt because its nigh on impossible to get out of. \n\nTake your self-righteous gatekeeping back to your wank shed in your coal town and leave him alone. This guy earned the right to complain as much as anyone else that bought into the lie my generation was told in HS. Dudes struggling and you see an opportunity to poke fun? Eat a dick hick.", "392" ], [ "Very true, I know a few guys that got into management as they \"aged out\" of typical programming jobs which is wild. Good money in management though and far less debt than being a specialised doctor. \n\n Personally for me working in a hospital was wild though. All of your calculations could either be perfect or you kill someone. The income is very high but malpractice insurance and 8 years of debt then 4 of making nothing is a tough pill to swallow. You lose a ton of your earning years young which is terrible for retirement planning or owning a home. I know some specialised doctors making 250k a year but are still 400k on debt in their late 30s. I know a few electricians that make as much as a doctor (120k) BUT they have been doing it since 20 and are on a much better financial position.", "392" ], [ "It's a calculation of cost of materials and energy prices. My home in Germany is fantastically well insulated whereas my home in the US had horse hair plaster for insulation. You literally could not touch the walls it was so cold. But due to lower heating and electricity costs my house was just as comfortable in the US. Because I could crank the AC without a significant change to my bill month to month\n \nIf you go all out in the US and make your home super energy efficient you will need to wait decades for it to pay off. Not saying it's the right thing to do but I understand why people dont do it...yet.", "731" ], [ "The Golf is a car that is far more expensive than most others in its class. To call it an economy car isn't entirely fair as they START at 21K new. A mirage, Fiesta, Fit or Focus are all economy cars and they are all thousands cheaper than a new Golf. Around Boston they were typically driven by older people who wanted a nice interior and the \"euro\" feel. It was quite rare to see someone younger cruising around in a new Golf but very typical to see them in older Golfs so maybe I should have been clearer. VW also doesn't have (this may have changed) great APR or financing deals whereas Ford or Chevy you could walk out with a new truck for 0 down and a 72 month note.\n\nI have seen the buyers demographics for a number of manufacturers and vehicles in the US and the Golf (excluding the GTI) is typically purchased by middle to upper middle income individuals between 40-65. This is by VW's own numbers. I have never seen the demographics for truck purchases specifically so maybe I can't talk to that but, again, by their own numbers it's a fact. Numbers for the TDI were wild though, typical buyer was worth (average) over 100K.", "352" ], [ "The S3 has a far nicer interior and much better options and digital dash etc so it's not just a Golf R with an Audi badge. I've sat in both and the Audi is a much nicer place to be. I really thought this too until I sat in the S3, it's just a nicer car and the price reflects that.\n\nI'm merely stating what other cars exist inside the price bracket of 0-67k not what else competes at 67K specifically. You could have a Focus RS or a Civic as a track toy and a Corolla to daily OR just a Golf R to flog and have to daily.\n\nWhen I looked at *used* cars I saw the Golf R sitting around 41-43K euro which is a ton of money. The car was great and I had my heart absolutely set on it BUT then I looked in that price bracket used and it's insane what you could get instead. The other cars in that bracket are better and it is not worth the 40K being asked when everything else is better at an identical price point. Value isn't relative when you can get more for the same amount that's pretty basic.", "352" ], [ "Oh yeah not disagreeing but my comment was only for me personally. I am secretly a Ford fanboy and have very fond memories of my Fiesta ST. Honestly at the same price I'd take the RS because, personally, I like it more. BUT there is no doubt it's worth the 5k extra for the Golf as it's just a better car. \n\n\nBut to speak to overall value....\n\nI came so close to buying an R wagon until I saw what else I could get in the used market. I splurged a bit for my C43 because it was literally loaded (Like vented seats in a C-class loaded) . It was \"only\" 6k more than a used, same mileage mid level Golf R wagon that didn't even have leather seats or a Pano sunroof. Option the VW as high as it gets (nowhere near the C43) and it was just as expensive for significantly less power, luxury and safety kit.", "93" ], [ "Did you have those god awful 19\" wheels on it? They look great but they ride like absolute shit. I have them and desperately want to swap theM out. I have to say the e class interior grew on me. At first it seemed a bit gaudy but then it just kind of clicked with me.\n\n\n > Out of interest, do you think the x43 (and I guess x53) AMGs will hold their values as well as the x63s?\n\nDo you mean sink like a stone? The x63 cars hold their value like a sieve and, truth be told, my car with 20k miles and 2 years old was literally 45k euro cheaper than when it was new. But they hit a plateau after the initial 2 years and seem to have stayed there whereas the x63 dont. \n\nI think the x43 series AMG cars are holding their values better as there is far more MB than AMG underneath so repair costs will be far lower and theres a far larger pool willing and able to buy one and run them properly. The x63 cars are also much more finicky with break in etc. So buying used is much more risky.", "352" ], [ "This just isnt true. The Mustang 4 cylinder and RS always shared an engine block. The head gasket issue was related to the factory mislabeling parts and using the ecoboost gaskets in the RS motors causing them to fail. This was a true fuck up but affected a relatively small number but the owners were very vocal (understandable). The RS has been dropped because the Focus has been dropped in the US and a new model was released in Europe so no new RS for a few years. \n\nThe RS is not an unreliable car overall but they absolutely did have HG issues which were addressed and fixed in a recall.", "393" ], [ "I think I know the wheels you're talking about. They have those super thick spokes with tiny little openings between? Oh god knows those are for MPG or something because they're hideous Haha. Be glad you didnt have the 19\"s though. I test drove a C43 with the 18\"s and loved it but when I drove my car after ordering it felt like they are just too heavy and large for the car. May be better on the E class though?\n\n > I should've elaborated, I was referring to the used market. I feel like used performance Mercs tend to demand a higher asking price than the equivalent Audi or BMWs.\n\nFrom what I've seen the MBs dont fair that well. The m340 wagon or S4 Avant started about 7-8k more than my C43 for lower specced used models. I'm really surprised to hear that actually, I would have had a very hard time choosing between a C43 and M340 if the price was identical but the MB (at the same price) had way more kit and lower miles. This may depend on area but I live about an hour away from Stuttgart so MB is king in my area. Where (roughly) are you from?", "93" ], [ "It's not a rumour and it has been known since dec. 2017. The part number of the gasket pulled from blown motors literally matched the EcoBoost gasket and not the RS. Exactly 48 cars were isolated from Focus RS forums as being related to this mix up from the 2017 model year (approx. 3500 total sold that year) and every single one was repaired at no cost to the owner. Ford estimates 3% of vehicles from the 2017 MY were affected but most had not experienced a problem but likely would have. This issue got blown out of proportion by people who had social media accounts and a grudge. \n\nA recall that affects 3% of cars is nothing out of the ordinary for a low volume sports car and does not mean it was unreliable. \n\nThe STI has KNOWN HG failures and Subaru did jack shit for years. Ford did right by RS owners.", "393" ], [ "You know what, we all made a gross miscalculation here. We all forgot US state and city sales tax isnt included in the purchase price of the car! In my home state (no idea what state he is in but it ranges from 4-8% and total can reach 10%) its 6.25% plus another few hundred for city taxes so the final sales price would be...$71690 or approx. 65,500 euro. That's another couple thousand euro to spend on the options list. \n\nSo keep in mind my original premise, the C43, S4 and M340 are all in striking distance of this wildly overpriced Golf R. With a few thousand euros to tick boxes your not walking away with a stripper.", "352" ], [ "No clue, I wish I knew exactly but to throw out a guess I'd say it's because many Europeans get their cars through company leases whereas this is far more rare in the US. If you have a lease you know exactly when you're going to move cars but if you own it youre less likely to know when yiure going to want to sell? Again this is all speculation I have nothing to back that up", "257" ] ]
483
[ 8792, 22600, 25341, 9733, 22728, 19416, 3824, 2719, 5403, 18945, 15408, 9270, 13917, 9856, 22446, 25337, 19404, 13341, 11119, 17738, 19643, 19516, 23792, 16693, 19071, 7670, 18212, 24343, 18222, 9674, 11811, 4433, 3928, 16278, 6214, 16950, 12416, 14512, 7919, 2818, 14597, 24215, 25175, 5240, 5864, 23879, 12846, 7544, 20927, 1625, 24404, 14618, 8144, 19192, 10712, 16239, 7992, 10982, 10944, 11758, 9599, 8692, 19741, 19496, 24261, 21882, 8557, 14201, 16523, 13353, 10507, 3563, 24694, 14947, 7530, 19464, 3682, 8979, 2110, 25000, 4285, 22710, 11908, 7408, 6272, 8186, 11851, 4697, 7995, 12245, 9123, 20233, 18435, 23151, 8610, 20882, 17431, 20423, 18399, 10176, 17847, 2906, 8483, 1736, 16857, 11958, 13888, 12426, 21798, 23163, 19570, 25049, 6949, 23804, 2299, 8472, 3735, 4053, 12539, 18405, 18800, 4386, 21152, 20828, 1238, 20406, 16713, 24682, 655, 5009, 18904, 10161, 15664, 5388, 18766, 13835, 4629, 7341, 2823, 8342, 11482, 16534, 12559, 7954, 20897, 10079, 4771, 4891, 24162, 17951, 18746, 23470, 6763, 23635, 22738, 12620, 23687, 2362, 480, 7006, 8473, 19330, 25265, 14773, 19977, 10110, 9454, 462, 14465, 18898, 19486, 22539, 18510, 16907, 19322, 16510, 3389, 438, 10474, 11777, 21121, 12325, 8206, 14445, 17726, 23980, 20083, 3113, 17521, 16309, 13246, 18888, 4453, 5697, 2166, 15821, 24321, 16055, 2017, 2908, 25342, 21522, 7688, 6455, 3087, 20595, 8698, 9677, 19567, 17408, 15926, 22583, 7059, 3762, 23135, 19126, 16951, 9873, 2131, 25380, 16212, 20078, 3618, 11120, 21045, 11186, 397, 178, 5723, 22188, 4131, 253, 7229, 3127, 1185, 10601, 14178, 14217, 1312, 17297, 17389, 1864, 10023, 4531, 24688, 11995, 1467, 7878, 15904, 6672, 6894, 20794, 8514, 6218, 14200, 16514, 16929, 23498, 10681, 24197, 13209, 23159, 9389, 15366, 135, 22134, 7710, 19475, 1840, 11957, 25479, 6374, 18217, 24120, 22275, 10765, 6568, 22597, 10755, 17528, 18854, 25475, 14144, 2651, 7515, 14162, 5881, 21271, 22030, 10075, 3821, 15976, 11020, 21193, 13327, 283, 7075, 21282, 25356, 10858, 16099, 21416, 20570, 25108, 12160, 4045, 20953, 17716, 6324, 14314, 23496, 14261, 2686, 16572, 18858, 4733, 24783, 6143, 4824, 6335, 13473, 18385, 3797, 21409, 10792, 12093, 7498, 8298, 10918, 19993, 8454, 12289, 21721, 17079, 19855, 16410, 16083, 18387, 11183, 20336, 1433, 20225, 20271, 8136, 7248, 2039, 6058, 12129, 10657, 14010, 14021, 18003, 7486, 24188, 9509, 2557, 5590, 18964, 1967, 24596, 915, 22360, 24313, 11683, 19804, 15138, 19812, 23901, 6537, 5821, 17842, 2497, 122, 25219, 6663, 18567, 2045, 14881, 3265, 7920, 13784, 13953, 10178, 11127, 17884, 24530, 1358, 23374, 25205, 1006, 9112, 18309, 6677, 20958, 23108, 14306, 12323, 19406, 9394, 17525, 2477, 1629, 2105, 5672, 21938, 1332, 20291, 13987, 5628, 7752, 12147, 22068, 10510, 9793, 2685, 22020, 8612, 11042, 24635, 4638, 6075, 3209, 145, 24130, 21291, 25333, 3710, 2149, 14877, 22070, 2018, 16441, 16988, 23152, 3138, 15509, 22456, 20398, 864, 10522, 20317, 21983, 23248, 6293, 10379, 17333, 23030, 11192, 3828, 13311, 6025, 2125, 20274, 20126, 1425, 17453, 5468, 2573, 19234, 3484, 1680, 13577, 18215, 16739, 16275, 12018, 24702, 22574, 13142, 9849, 6254, 15946, 5478, 9050, 23148, 8884, 22919, 13316, 16343, 11245, 372, 10948, 6065, 1941, 10301, 16233, 5336, 53, 9866, 5295, 4915, 12269, 17016, 20332, 10080, 9936, 6608, 5078, 21066 ]
reddit_dump_-_Spitfire_-
[ [ "Respectfully disagree. The redesigned angled turret is an improvement, but frankly its too little, too late. \n\nI'd rather we mass manufacture upgraded T90s with active protection systems, and procure T-14s to address shortfalls. \n\nI'm guessing the army was talked into buying this tank just to keep the production line going, and perhaps infuse some cash into HVF's ongoing R & D programs.", "775" ], [ "> just to prop up PSUs.\n\nThat's only partially true. We can't keep making the same mistake we did with the LCA. \n\nEven if the initial version only meets ~75-80% of user requirements, its still an indigenous platform that can be improved over time. \n\nFor example, the first JF-17 (block 1) was a very, very basic fighter, but they built an entire ecosystem around it as they worked on upgrading the jet. Now they can comfortably churn out a squad of block 3's every year, with all the requisite training and maintenance facilities already in place.\n\n\nLets hope the DRDO invests the money from this order into future programs and delivers a better iteration/derivative in a couple of years.", "775" ], [ "> we also have hot borders\n\nYeah, but so do the Pakistanis.\n\nI agree our borders are always tense, but the probability of a full fledged war involving massive tank formations is unlikely. We're prepared for it, of course, and our inventory already outclasses/outnumbers anything the Pakistanis can muster. \n\nThankfully the terrain in the north isn't conducive to armored warfare (for the most part). \n\n > Sometimes we dont have the luxury to wait.\n\nIt isn't simply a question of development, but also integrating it into the armed forces. That includes maintenance, training etc. The entire supply chain and indigenous ecosystem that surrounds it is just as critical as the platform itself. \n\nWe're talking about rolling out multiple versions of the Tejas now, but that's only feasible because we have the human capital and technical expertise required to support such an endeavor. \n\nI could be wrong, but I think the army can afford to take a long term perspective when it comes to tanks.", "124" ], [ "Just answer the phone and tell him he's being fucking weird. \n\n1.He didn't have the balls to talk to you in person\n\n2.Calling you from different numbers everyday makes him appear desperate\n\n3.Having his friends call you seems pointless and demonstrates immaturity \n\n4.You can press charges\n\n\n\nIf you walk him through just how retarded his approach is, maybe he'll get his act together someday. \n\n\n\nI feel like a lot of sexually inexperienced guys behave like children, simply because they have little to no exposure to the opposite sex. \n\nI almost feel bad for this kid given his total lack of game. How is he ever going to get laid if this is how he behaves as an adult? Pathetic.", "206" ], [ "No, it isn’t. Antifa is a legitimate movement in the west. We, otoh, have brain dead morons who have no idea what side they’re on or why. \n\nIn this case, we have a self proclaimed environmentalist who supports stubble burning and 1940s farming practices. Why? No idea. Even she doesn’t know.\n\nWe need to quit using a western paradigm and labeling desis. 9/10 they have no idea wtf they’re talking about.\n\nUpper middle class Hindu women in South Asia legitimately believe they’re fighting fascism? In India? Are you fucking kidding me?", "858" ], [ "Another view: every major story about India over the last 2 months has had ~25 awards.\n\nIt’s basically paid advertising at this point, and 99% of people here have absolutely no understanding of the situation.\n\nI doubt I’ll change any minds here, but if you’re genuinely interested, i encourage you to research this yourself.\n\nIf you can come up with an objective analysis to disprove the IMF, I’m all ears. \n\nAlso, since the other guy brought up Kashmir, you may want to look up the Kashmiri pandit genocide or the hundreds of terrorists attacks by Islamic terrorists in India.\n\nDon’t rely on click bait headlines, do your own research.", "858" ], [ "2 front page news stories about India in as many days, each with dozens of awards.\n\nHeadlines deliberately written in a manner to induce anger/outrage/shock etc.\n\nThis bot war has been going on for sometime now, not sure if anyone has picked up on it. \n\nThere’s a consistent effort to highlight negative news and make it appear as though minorities are under attack, <PERSON> is fascist etc.\n\nYou’ll see all the standard buzzwords like “nazis”, “fascism”, “far right”, “hindutva” used in roughly similar phrases.\n\nThe idea is to try and bring down the government, this isn’t about Muslims or farm laws. It’s politics.", "858" ], [ "To be fair though, even <PERSON> supports the farm laws. He’s just making a fuss because he’s currently in the opposition. \n\nThis isn’t about reform or moving the country forward.\n\nThe issue here is she worked with a self proclaimed Canadian khalistani. He will never leave North America to live in South Asia, but thanks to him, this woman is going to hang. \n\nMaybe don’t work with terrorists? Sounds fair to me.", "760" ], [ "True, now that I see this she just sounds like a run of the mill liberal college student.\n\nShe’s obviously parroting a lot of what she hears from idealistic/naive kids, but this woman is hardly the brains behind this disinformation campaign. \n\nEither way though, working with khalistanis = death penalty imo. I don’t see any alternatives I’m afraid.", "293" ], [ "The utter nonsense that gets upvoted on reddit is baffling tbh. \n\nThe organization you’re talking about worked with both the Nazis and the Japanese, because India was colonized by the English. Duh?\n\nLiterally all western institutions were created by white supremacists. Or did you conveniently forget that?\n\nIt has nothing to do with nazi ideology, they were simply working with England’s enemies. \n\nThe swastika is an ancient Hindu symbol. Again, nothing to do with hitler or Germany. \n\nJfc reddit.", "1009" ], [ "Yeah I know, let’s side with England that’s colonizing us, or America where they love black and brown people.\n\n > they are technologically superior \n\nYeah dude, how the hell else were they supposed to get weapons to fight the English?\n\n > cover it up like it was all about independence \n\n<PERSON>, you’re arguably the dumbest person I’ve spoken to on here so far.\n\nDo you think <PERSON> was president during WW2? Are you somehow not familiar with western history?", "227" ], [ "Yeah, I know dude. \n\nThe guy I was replying to thinks the leaders of India’s independence movement were nazis because they worked with Germany.\n\nWe were colonized by the English, and literally everyone was basically a nazi. Wtf choice did we have? We obviously worked with England’s enemies. Fucking duh. \n\nI’ve seen so many comments on reddit by brain dead morons about india being fascist. \n\nIt’s shocking how much disinformation is casually thrown about here. It’s almost as bad as YouTube comments at this point.", "858" ], [ "And? Was the attack on the Capitol a protest or a riot? \n\nWhat do you think America is going to do when they find the people who beat that cop to death? Is America fascist? \n\n400 cops were attacked with deadly weapons, they planted what amounts to the ISIS flag on the Red Fort, and they collaborated with known terrorists. \n\nYou think laws only matter in America? Do we look like fools to you?", "609" ], [ "He isn’t the only one. \n\nDubai used to be the preferred base of operations of the Indian mafia. Some our most notorious gangsters, smugglers and homegrown terrorists operated out of Dubai before we signed an extradition treaty with the UAE.\n\nSome of them live in Pakistan now, while others live in south east Asia under false identities. I believe Indian intelligence “repatriated” a couple from Oman a few years ago, but nobody has heard from them since.", "858" ], [ "1. Racism: India has its problems, but white people just need something to complain about and/or exploit. \n\n2. Directed propaganda: Obvious psychological warfare along all the usual fault lines line religion, ethnicity, language, gender etc\n\n3. Internal biases + machine learning algorithms: Negative stories get more attention, and the sites are designed to keep you engaged. It creates a feedback loop of outrage porn and regular porn basically. So we’re all either horny or angry pretty much all the time.\n\n4. Idiotic behaviour by desis themselves: We have a lot of fucking idiots in our country. Ultimately it’s up to us to address some of these issues.\n\n5. Self hate: This is a growing concern in the liberal upper middle class/NRI/ABCD segment.", "858" ], [ "I don’t understand how we’re “bhakts”, but somehow your theocratic state with blasphemy laws is a paragon of virtue. What does that make you exactly? \n\n > “taking over Kashmir”\n\nWell I certainly don’t see you or your countrymen harping about Uighurs, and the four wars we’ve fought in the past may have coloured my opinions. \n\n > it is however concerning...consistent pattern of rape\n\nCome on. You and I both know this is a stretch, and you’re grasping at straws in a laughable attempt to conceal your strategic designs as some kind of “principled stance for human rights”.\n\nThe Indian army can’t get away with such things, be real. This is india we’re talking about, not Balochistan. \n\n > this is a trend\n\n<PERSON>, did you also notice a trend when millions of hardcore Sunni fanatics were protesting against the French president in Karachi a couple of months ago?? How about when Shia miners were butchered in Balochistan? \n\nThe truth is you’re a banana republic, and upper middle class Pakistanis like you have no faith in your own government. You expect more from Indians and Hindus than you do from your own people.\n\nMy suggestion would be to quit worrying about Kashmir, and start seriously thinking about how you’re going to reform your country.", "858" ], [ "I doubt you believe in anything you’ve said here, and at this point you’re just arguing to argue.\n\nWe fully understand the situation in our country, and we’re more than capable of handling it. I’m sure this is obvious to you as well, but of course you have an agenda of your own. \n\nAs for China, not only did we kill 45 of their soldiers but they’re now disengaging as well. Too bad we didn’t go to war like you thought we would.\n\nYou can keep fantasizing about Kashmir. We’ll keep reforming our economy and moving forward.", "753" ], [ "You’d have to be an idiot to marry a woke girl in a country like India to begin with. Unless she’s a perfect 10, it’s not worth the trouble. \n\nJust go down a notch in the socioeconomic ladder and find someone from a modest background. \n\nI know more than a few single feminists over 30. 99% of them will die alone. \n\nThere aren’t very many educated middle class men in India. You can find alternatives. It’s the poor men who will be left hanging tbh, and that’s going to be a serious issue in the future.", "490" ] ]
72
[ 10575, 14729, 14229, 3510, 17321, 3324, 21655, 18542, 7587, 22537, 464, 18380, 24901, 14981, 18509, 10099, 19064, 18730, 10491, 14397, 13396, 17601, 2286, 19587, 3965, 5249, 14049, 20688, 17944, 12651, 6160, 25233, 9521, 2889, 15096, 10696, 2560, 3847, 12023, 8830, 14916, 20887, 1399, 1555, 14678, 22873, 3159, 20528, 23125, 9162, 6315, 5163, 10432, 15849, 15806, 3743, 1936, 8345, 7654, 24349, 17486, 8807, 14289, 25052, 5754, 3533, 20725, 14931, 8196, 3803, 21403, 2809, 15869, 11356, 2239, 11782, 23241, 4597, 22590, 16988, 21401, 1921, 18280, 4700, 11763, 4620, 14373, 13873, 10532, 14937, 8869, 2688, 3020, 22278, 20440, 17485, 22075, 7161, 10718, 24453, 20347, 4853, 10417, 4018, 10299, 24575, 14948, 20341, 1125, 4574, 11423, 10538, 4454, 14360, 16060, 6409, 10008, 24386, 17839, 21782, 12053, 14278, 9846, 19200, 23971, 10525, 9329, 24583, 15416, 23493, 4071, 1558, 5922, 24078, 7597, 7936, 13292, 1120, 12800, 12478, 11287, 4922, 6856, 3840, 13656, 1447, 16779, 17954, 25363, 21802, 2944, 16458, 13308, 23173, 24264, 2500, 12215, 6146, 5073, 23467, 10978, 11753, 2764, 7131, 18505, 17756, 6620, 13961, 11816, 22949, 20442, 10511, 16946, 19710, 13765, 12998, 16066, 17150, 2062, 3486, 18967, 18318, 7459, 19208, 8694, 12952, 17493, 2311, 16236, 8849, 14108, 16808, 19580, 18267, 2259, 12999, 11010, 6212, 18428, 2760, 2223, 21669, 5938, 23928, 13752, 9977, 7472, 24319, 10529, 17480, 2599, 18436, 4832, 16686, 2415, 19853, 18880, 21910, 22034, 24362, 7090, 5539, 11785, 4783, 13629, 2836, 2294, 1482, 18043, 12483, 4528, 20671, 9413, 21221, 751, 1458, 13248, 17235, 4086, 21994, 7915, 12701, 16083, 23010, 6728, 18122, 4815, 3277, 4441, 1018, 11875, 2323, 2142, 3899, 13147, 7008, 11284, 17464, 9032, 914, 23074, 23842, 10493, 2116, 11350, 3093, 2277, 4581, 6406, 8535, 7235, 22798, 6680, 24928, 18059, 10763, 21705, 12119, 21482, 17680, 21332, 9996, 11827, 12695, 12820, 4547, 2489, 1016, 14848, 7002, 13686, 4987, 441, 99, 25318, 3857, 4466, 14246, 4598, 8646, 15857, 9115, 7537, 12721, 2604, 24730, 8320, 24154, 12831, 18243, 10980, 8426, 7419, 11864, 21133, 6276, 4584, 5107, 9089, 14307, 606, 3029, 15752, 21396, 4036, 24866, 14319, 2873, 14618, 14118, 6551, 22662, 6786, 9544, 10040, 22197, 3757, 21924, 2182, 10077, 6390, 22321, 8147, 9739, 7543, 8531, 24612, 3767, 13796, 14949, 14150, 24921, 14474, 7569, 22935, 9942, 3499, 10572, 16181, 17507, 9466, 9893, 20161, 19592, 3988, 22046, 21132, 19258, 6232, 5498, 15477, 8378, 12785, 18923, 5572, 18796, 20950, 14873, 5921, 24771, 9653, 21136, 21508, 22902, 10084, 1670, 5411, 4996, 18525, 12606, 12010, 17130, 3753, 1878, 19895, 16979, 16485, 11046, 12296, 2292, 6310, 11485, 15440, 9636, 7335, 14964, 4572, 17797, 21319, 16990, 2199, 8256, 5792, 21896, 18040, 6273, 20238, 9916, 22671, 1439, 6429, 874, 171, 5953, 5369, 12972, 1160, 9369, 21496, 16814, 24359, 15275, 22495, 2783, 1895, 8211, 7899, 18587, 22007, 17236, 17559, 2989, 11648, 12128, 233, 14788, 2204, 8700, 1396, 817, 14231, 18787, 22944, 18233, 17237, 1207, 5378, 15885, 8336, 3637, 25201, 5674, 14932, 20242, 7213, 6445, 12859, 3532, 15916, 6250, 17990, 19331, 8683, 12035, 20966, 4616, 5620, 1455, 8313, 2774, 3921, 20828, 2700, 10977, 18060, 7145, 13780, 8883, 8758, 9396, 14695, 9692, 1747, 10857, 9331, 3280, 2895, 20212, 11431 ]
reddit_dump_-ah
[ [ "> Nobody needs to wait until 2024, there’s real-time data in the form of the markets.\n\nSorry.. Which markets give you business creation and closure data?\n\n > Sterlings gonna bite it soon and that will put the government in quite the spot.\n\nThe pound is at a 9 month high and currently projected to rise (see [this](_URL_0_)) the consensus is that it's undervalued at the moment.. The FTSE250 is pretty positive too if you are looking at market data, manufacturing PMI is positive too. And I'm still not sure how you are linking this in to the initial issue around businesses relocating to the EU...", "841" ], [ "Just had one of our lath and plaster ceilings taken down (which is a shame, because when it's solid, it's incredibly good at insulating sound etc.. but it's stupid expensive to put back if it needs to come down, the cost of lath is massive and getting someone who knows how to do it is hard enough) and the amount of coal dust and other crap that had accumulated over period while it was in place was truly insane.\n\nUnfortunately we've now got a crack and a break in another room, hopefully it can be rescued rather than taken down, but we'll see..\n\nLime plaster is pretty interesting though, especially in older housing, the few places where we've had bits of the house plastered in gypsum (well, previous owners..) you end up with more condensation and damp issues. Replace it with line and that basically goes away.", "309" ], [ "As I understand it, in the context of UK law, as long as the buyer is in the UK the law applies and they have their statutory rights and it doesn't matter where in the world the seller is. If the seller decides to ignore that then the buyer should be able to get their money back either way (because their bank/payment source..) will likely also be in the UK, and if nothing else will comply with the rules and they'll have recourse that way.", "467" ], [ "> The EU aren't having problems shipping their catch to the EU.\n\nThat's a somewhat narrow perspective. EU fishermen are losing access to UK waters (gradually, but still) and at present there are delays/barriers in getting UK caught seafood to EU processors, there are issues for portions of the UK industry (and that's not a good thing, although somewhat expected) but on the EU side, the impacted industry is quite a bit larger although likely to see transitional support. The barriers that UK exporters are facing are essentially replicated in the other direction too, although obviously the EU and UK may take different steps to mitigate any issues.\n\nObviously the UK press is focusing on the UK's industry, but even just looking at quota issues and the English language reporting, you have Ireland facing issues, and of course the wider loss to the nine coastal states involved is around £160m (with Ireland seemingly having the most at stake). Some of the regulatory (import/export) issues can likely be settled and some is around process rather than anything else, but the impact is very much not limited to the UK side.", "631" ], [ "If you had an accident and it turned out that you should have been wearing glasses (because without them you don't meet the minimum eyesight standard for driving) then you'd have an issue, but it's not particularly likely that anyone would neccesarily find out or know. Obviously the point being that you don't want to endanger other road users if you can avoid it..\n\nIf you need glasses to meet the minimum standard, or your eyesight deteriorates to the point that you do, wear glasses. If they improve your ability to see things and so reduce the risk that you'll end up in an accident, or hit something (or someone) wear your glasses. Being able to see is incredibly useful when driving, I mean I change my windscreen wipers when they stop working well because it makes a massive difference to visibility, and visibility is a good thing when driving, if I could improve my eyesight with glasses, then I'd wear them too (and indeed I do wear polarised sunglasses when its sunny because it really makes a difference...).", "362" ], [ "> A minor and diminishing inconvenience compared to all the crap Ireland have had to endure from our British neighbours from hell\n\nGiven the history of Ireland that's not something a sane person is going to dispute. I suppose my point is that people on the remain and leave side of this discussion are often very insular, the UK press focuses pretty hard on UK impacts in isolation, while the impact of the UK leaving the EU is very much not limited to the UK. That was expected, the FTA mitigated that in both directions etc.. It applies to the costs and to some extent the benefits too, the UK being out of the political project means it is no longer a block on things like EU defence cooperation or further integration, the whole push to borrow for the covid recovery would likely have been blocked by a UK government too.\n\nIt's a bit bizarre to see people treating this like its only relevant to the UK.", "631" ], [ "Probably worth pointing at the actual guidance too ([Coronavirus (COVID-19): EU Settlement Scheme - guidance for applicants](_URL_0_)) as it's clearer than the article about the impact and what the outcomes are under a given set of circumstances, essentially it seems to be that if someone decided to leave the UK and then decided not to return (but were not prevented from doing so) for a significant period, then the status being sought under the settlement scheme could be impacted, unless someone can show an exceptional circumstance.\n\nThe headline makes it sound a bit like EU nationals who were forced home, or could not return to the UK would lose their status, that isn't the case. Although hopefully people will be reading the article given it gives a more accurate picture...", "631" ], [ "> Also, depending on your job, smoking does impair your ability. Basically any job that needs you to be healthy and physically fit would (statistically) be impaired to some extend by smoking.\n\nThen you could argue that eating unhealthy food would (statistically) impair your ability to work too. Just not immediately.\n\nThe difference between most recreational drugs and alcohol are that they impair your ability to do your job immediately, rather than potentially impairing it in the future. Oh and the acceptability of alcohol also varies somewhat by workplace.. Having a beer/wine with lunch still is a thing in some (ever smaller numbers of...) positions..\n\n", "594" ], [ "> Then you need to request a return through the returns process, get shipping label and post the items.\n\nYou'd want to exhaust the options with the seller in the first place... If you can solve it with then then there is no issue either way. You might want to read up this thread, I'm talking about the applicability of distance selling rules to non-UK sellers, like I said, the tax issues don't come into it.", "467" ], [ "> Follow up far enough and you get to someone claiming distance selling regulations means they can get a refund via chargeback just because they don't want to pay import fees.\n\nSure, but again, the question I responded to was whether distance selling regulations apply to non-UK/non-EU purchases. And they do, they grant rights to the consumer and the seller is required to comply, where they don't you have several avenues to get your money back.\n\n > That's the thread I was picking up.\n\nRight, but I responded to /u/<PERSON>'s questin of \n\n > > I'm honestly not sure how that works when the vendor is in another jurisdiction.\n\nOn the tax side, it's either a fuck up (double VAT payment) in which case you speak to the seller, or it's VAT that's due (in which cease it's due...), if you return that item you might also need to sort out a vat refund from HMRC at that point. Although in all cases you want to speak to the seller first to sort it out, and if they don't comply with their obligations and leave you out of pocket because they aren't following the rules that apply in the UK, you can follow up with your payment processor.. \n\nAnd again, that has been true for non-EU purchases or indeed EU purchases where the seller has taken the piss prior to brexit.", "467" ], [ "> The retails has no obligation to work out your import obligations.\n\nThey generally have in incentive to, and they might well have an obligation if they haven't made the original source of goods clear (as that is part of the distance selling regulations), or are failing to adhere to UK VAT rules. If I sell something and represent it as being in the UK, and then it arrives with you with a massive additional customs and tax charge as it actually came from the US, I'm in breach of my contract to you or UK regulations after all.\n\n > So yeah ... Sure, if they broke EU distance selling regulations, you'd have a case but that's not the scenario being described here where people are saying they could demand a refund after refusing to pay import duty.\n\nAgain, I replied to someone asking whether distance selling regulations apply to non-UK sellers. They do.", "467" ], [ "> Christ, have we now descended to \"If they outright commit fraud\"?\n\nNo..? But omitting information about the source of a good seems to be a common issue at the moment with EU sales, the issue not being that the goods come from the EU, but rather that they are bought from an EU seller, selling non-EU goods.\n\n > YES, there are obligations on the seller. Sorting out your import fees is NOT one of them.\n\nVAT compliance is (depending on seller to some extent), but beyond that no, but I haven't suggested otherwise.\n\n > Correctly labelling the item is, but that has nothing to do with paying the fees beyond allowing them to be calculated correctly.\n\nEnsuring that the source of a good is visible at the point of sale is relevant as to whether the customer would expect to see any additional fees. \n\nIf we are looking at the parents issue here, it would appear to be either VAT (so they failed to notice that VAT was not being paid and it was due on arrival as the seller has not or does not have to register for UK VAT), or that the goods in question are subject to duties because the good is not an EU good.\n\nNone of this is particularly new or special bar the VAT change..", "322" ], [ "Right, but at the same time I think we can probably put the idea that races should be separated and keep to their own geographic, with the attendant positions that various countries should ideally be racially pure and that mixed marriages are a bad thing as broadly falling into the same broad category as racism, especially in a contemporary context. I'd also find it fairly unsurprising if people were to cover racism (seeing other races as inferior) which is after all broadly unacceptable these days with the sort of position being advocated here. Not least because that kind of separation and us vs them mentality tends to generate hostility.", "1020" ], [ "I doubt that he said anything of the sort to be honest, the line is basically that company policy prevents them from having personal data on their laptops or phones and that they only use their laptops/phones for communication. If any of our guys were stupid enough to try it on, or claim that they had security clearances in excess of a border guards etc.. They'd cease to work for us quite rapidly as the antagonism creates issues (and this year I've had guys in the US, China, Vietnam, Germany, Poland and even Russia (specifically Kazan for a conference..) so it's not just a US issue.)", "779" ], [ "Rsync does a good job generally, although moved, and a huge number of backup solutions are built on it. Check out 'back in time' it makes most of that (and scheduling and even restores) easy.\n\nYou are right that renames and moves can cause issues, but they are issues you can generally be avoided by thinking about your backups before you make major changes.\n\nFor context, I use a combination of rsync and back in time to maintain backups of a slew of linux boxes ranging from laptops through to servers.", "570" ], [ "It won't see renamed (or moved..) files as the same file, which, if you move large amounts of stuff around can lead to larger incremental backups. However the scenario you are talking about above is handled well, you can carry out daily (I do 6 hourly) incremental backups and with a bit of tweaking manage them fairly well. That is to say, I can view any of my last months 6 hourly backups and restore completely from any one of them, or a file from any of those points in time from any of those backups. See [this](_URL_0_), or look at something like 'back in time' that'll automate it for you.", "171" ], [ "True. Although I wonder if it wasn't a better visual (if 'better' is the right word..) than having him be drowned out by protesters and be 'chased off'. If it were me and he had control over the press conference, I'd probably have suggested he go out and then speak when able, and make the point of being quiet when being drowned out, but remain until he had managed to say whatever he wanted or the conference ended, but I'm not sure that it wouldn't have just been reported as him having been heckled 'off' either way.\n\nThe reporting of these things is incredibly fickle at the moment (The 'get out of my town' thing, or indeed the '<PERSON> heckled by her own party members' things both spring to mind, neither being particularly great stories in anything other than a spin sense).\n\nThe '<PERSON>' line from him was insane though.. Was that somehow aimed at younger voters? Had he just finished watching the second infinity war? I mean that's on a par with the Greens suggesting they want to ban ice cream vans in terms of shitty messaging that was only ever going to cost him.", "469" ], [ "> The City of London will be done for if the current Brexit situation goes through. \n\nNo, it won't, even in a worst case, no-deal exit, the City is expected to be broadly fine, it may not grow as quickly or it may even grow more quickly, it rather depends on what the Government decides to do policy wise. It's not going anywhere, and the winners of any change will be New York and Hong Kong. There is a certain amount of 'branching' happening, which will no doubt be a little beneficial to the likes of Germany, France the Netherlands, Dublin and so on, but very little risk to the core of the cities business. You'll find it hard to find anything that suggests a different outcome too..\n\n > I don't think the country will be considered safe for business anymore if more than half of the people are unemployed. \n\nThere is absolutely no suggestion that unemployment will rise to 50% there is a risk with a no-deal exit that it could rise to 5% however, which would still leave the UK below the EU and Euro area average, below the level of France, Italy, Spain etc..\n\nAgain, if you have a prediction for 50% unemployment, or ever 15% I'd be impressed..\n\n > Or do you reckon the Brits are so well-trained and obedient that they'll just let it slide and let the billionaires go about their business as usual? Not out of the question. But it's one thing to be a formidable little wageslave, and quite another if there's no wage to be had.\n\nI'm not sure what that's supposed to mean.. The current worst case predictions in terms of recessions in the event of a catastrophic no-deal are all relatively shallow and relatively short, they don't approach 2008 or even 1990/1973 levels so given the UK seems to have managed through both, even in the worst case it'd manage through a recession caused by leaving the EU.", "631" ], [ "> You're not sure what that's supposed to mean? It means I'm belittling your neoliberal world view. \n\nReally? I'll have to work out what my neoliberal world view is I suppose..\n\n > And I mean, who could fault you? You would have been right the last ~ 40 years. But people (at least on the continent) have been slowly realizing that globalization and global finance have been cutting into their country's sovereignty and thus into their own political power, so with all the problems we're facing, and I'll admit, the current roster of politicians have been kinda successful in keeping them away from the people, I fully expect it all to come crashing down within my lifetime. You're welcome to think of me as naive, I surely feel that way about you.\n\nAnd this in the context of the EU, as a market orientated, broadly neo-liberal economic block looking at tighter political and social integration..?", "437" ], [ "> because I bet this will cost more than their auto liability policy covers.\n\nWhat are the minimums? IIRC the UK has a legal minimum of £1m in third party property damage cover (unlimited cover for injury or death..) with 'RTA Cover' but I've never seen that available to buy, mostly the cheapest cover you can pick up is third party and that has the same unlimited cover for injury or death, plus a minimum of £20m in property damage cover.", "667" ], [ "> and proroguing to dismiss parliament's objections is clearly a significant one\n\nIt would be, but given Parliament hasn't managed to actually voice those objections in any meaningful way, it's difficult to come to the conclusion you have.\n\nParliament can get rid of the government, they can still legislate, the issue isn't that a new session is being called with an unusually long prorogation, the issue is that there appears to be significant opposition to the outcome of legislation MP's have already passed, without that opposition having the numbers to do anything meaningful about it (and so pushing to try and build a majority to create a delay, albeit one that is dependent on a third party).\n\nIt's a really odd scenario, MP's don't want the legislation they passed to come into effect, but don't really want to do anything that means they are tied to preventing it from doing so.", "236" ], [ "> Yes but it's important to realise where the concept of a political sovereign came from. Originally the King or Queen was the supreme sovereign said to represent both god and the people, and could override parliament, shut it down, and select MPs and ministers on a whim.\n\nRight, and that essentially started to die with the Bill of Rights in <PHONE_NUMBER> and has only been eroded since.\n\n > The legal sovereignty of parliament was always subservient to the political sovereign. \n\nSort of, but not really, or at least unlike the question of Parliamentary sovereignty vs the power of the Sovereign, it hasn't really been tested in the same way. Parliament hasn't always been subject to voters, indeed it largely hasn't, and the franchise has changed over time. Parliament is sovereign, it is only subject to political will as far as it is willing to be, the barriers there are essentially customary, with the barriers (public opposition and potentially the crown) bring pressure to bear from outside of the Parliamentary system as it were.\n\n > After suffrage most of the power of the political sovereign fell to the electorate\n\nThey fell to the electorate in so far as the electorate determine the make up of Parliament..\n\n > but many powers stayed under royal prerogative, including the power to prorogue and until FTPA dissolve them completely. Because that power nowadays lies with the government, \n\nThe powers sit with government, but the power lies with Parliament. Government is 'of' Parliament and Parliament can shift where powers sit, government can't (without the consent of Parliament), the Crown can't (without the consent of Parliament...). \n\n > that means in many areas the government has power and sovereignty over the mere legal sovereignty of parliament. \n\nNo, it has delegated competencies that it can make use of, as long as Parliament doesn't say otherwise. It doesn't have an independent source of legitimacy or power outside of Parliament.\n\n > Parliament can obviously change the law to take that power away from the government, just as they could theoretically take the power away from the electorate. But in reality they won't.\n\nThat being the point of Parliamentary sovereignty.. Parliament is sovereign even though it allows Government to exercise executive powers, it is still sovereign when it hands competencies to the EU, or when a treaty binds it. The point is that only Parliament can rip all that up and do essentially whatever it wants with it.", "236" ], [ "> Secondly, parliament don't decide elections, they happen every 5 years via the fixed terms act.\n\nParliament legislated to fix the periods at which elections are held, as part of the FTPA, before that (So before the coalition..) it was down to the PM to decide when an election was help (and a PM had the majority in Parliament..). As part of the FTPA Parliament can decide to hold an election at any point, they just need to vote to have one (With an increased majority) or they could repeal the FTPA and enact legislation that lets them hold elections whenever they see fit.\n\n > Third, parliament could not take away the queen's powers because all law had to go through Royal ascent. Legally and constitutionally she is the top of the food chain. Parliament is not this all powerful being, they are subject to both the people and the crown.\n\nIn theory the Queen could refuse, in practice she doesn't, because it would cause an actual constitutional crisis, and then lead to either the requirement for royal assent to be remove (Parliament is sovereign after all) or the dissolution of the Monarchy.. Parliament is sovereign, it is not subject to the Crown or the People if it doesn't want to be.\n\n > Fourth, I really think you are getting confused over how democracy works, you're listing of all these powers parliament theoretically has. Yes MP's can technically vote how they want, but that doesn't mean its 100% democratic whenever they do. Parliament can abuse its power, as it is doing now, and no longer be an instrument of democracy but an instrument of dictatorship. Like you said:\n\nWe are a representative democracy, MP's can and do vote how they want. That's literally how our democracy works. It's not as democratic as other systems might be, but it doesn't stop being a democracy and again, it is how our system works. If we don't like it, we can change it, it wouldn't be the first time, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of support for that.\n\n > This is an example of what parliament could potentially do (which spoiler alert, due to what I've said above, it couldn't) that doesn't make it democratic.\n\nYeah, you were wrong above. Parliament can do those things, it is held in check by what would happen if it did, not a lack of power in a constitutional sense.\n\n > I'm not arguing that parliament isn't a powerful tool, I'm arguing that it's one that needs to be put down for now. \n\nAnd I'm saying you are absolutely, fundamentally wrong. The only way we leave the EU is with Parliament legislating for it (which it has done), and the whole basis of our democratic system is that Parliament is sovereign, something you seem to want to throw away. MP's get to vote how they want, the pressure they face is political not legal or constitutional. If they wanted to revoke tomorrow they could, and by the same virtue if they wanted to take the UK out without anyone saying they should and without a deal in place they could do that too.\n\n > I really don't get where you're going with a largely incorrect list of what parliament hypothetically can and can't do\n\nI'm not wrong, but you seem to be poorly informed about how our system works and how it is supposed to work.", "236" ], [ "> I mean, it does. It has the power of royal prerogative. That is not something parliament can exercise, even with a majority.\n\nIt is something that Parliament has and can exercise if it decides to either by setting a new precedent (see the whole consent before declaring war thing that came about post Iraq, of if you want to go right back to the first 'loss' of a prerogative power, the inability of the Sovereign to interpret common law..) or by legislating (see the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011...).\n\n > It has sovereignty over the law alone. It can use that power to take more powers, but checks and balances provided by the prerogative powers of government and political power of the electorate would prevent it. Our constitution is very clear on this, parliament is not the ultimate sovereign of this country.\n\nIt has the power to remove prerogative powers in their entirety.. The only thing preventing it is Parliament itself.\n\nYour own quote says as much...", "236" ], [ "> You easily admit that a prison is a place where crimes are committed, in our case rape. \n\nIIRC the reported rape of sexual assaults in UK prisons is lower than in the general population (although it has been rising over the last decade). It's something like 0.3% of prisoners reporting an assault in the UK vs 4% in the US. It should be 0% obviously, and funding and staff cuts have seriously hurt the prison service in the UK, but the prison rape joke things seems to largely still be an imported cultural thing from the US rather than something endemic to UK prisons.", "878" ], [ "> Brexit or not, Britain does not oppose anymore the integration. \n\nWhen the UK leaves sure, if in the unlikely event the UK remains it is almost certainly going to oppose any and all further integration, and there isn't a huge amount of pressure that can be brought to change that. It's not like further integration is particularly popular with the remain side of the current split, and it obviously isn't with the leave side, future UK governments in a UK that doesn't leave the EU are going to be hamstrung and aiming to keep the EU pretty static.", "564" ], [ "The rejoining element is really quite interesting. One of the reasons the remain faction in the UK is fighting so hard now is, at least in part, because they are aware that rejoining is incredibly unlikely any time soon, and becomes less likely if the UK and EU diverge and specifically if the EU integrates further.\n\nThat said, you are absolutely right, the UK and EU are neighbours and, outside of the EU, the UK should be looking for a close relationship as a partner in the region.", "631" ], [ "Indeed, it seems like the principle being outlined would effectively undermine the power to prorogue entirely, or it doesn't quite fit, although there is something in the argument to 'bound' the powers of prorogation, although whether it actually limits parliamentary sovereignty is bit of a stretch.\n\nIt doesn't help that he wants to rely on a principle, ignore some of the reality of the current situation and yet use the current situation to define what is impermissible..", "236" ], [ "> Depends on when exactly that prorogation was. Also a shorter version would still leave more time on either side. It could have written something more detailed about avoiding no deal in all circumstances not just on the 31st. \n\nIt could have done that anyway, the issue there was a lack of parliamentary support not time..\n\n > Or it could have continued to force <PERSON> to reveal his \"plans\" to get a deal. They have to be able to react to what is happening in real time rather than waiting until mid October.\n\nIt could have done a lot of things, if it had support in Parliament, and that's got to be a consideration. Prorogation doesn't really appear to have prevented Parliament from acting because Parliament has had time to act and seems disinclined to act in any case. The principles being discussed come down to whether the PM can use prorogation to stifle Parliament, well it does that regardless (it terminates bills and questions etc..) so it comes down to the time taken, and the argument there would be one of very specific practicality.\n\nI'll be interesting to see where the SC lands.", "236" ], [ "> The UK will have to remain compliant with all EU market regulations regardless. There will be no readjustment for the markets, because they will still be intrinsically tied to one another.\n\nOutside of the EU, the degree that the UK remains aligned will depend on the UK, it almost certainly won't remain fully aligned, doubly so in terms of its internal market. \n\n > The risk of leaving was not the largest issue for remain, it was that the EU is extremely beneficial to all members.\n\nIt was the single largest driver as given by leave voters after the referendum. Which isn't surprising as it was also the largest plank of the remain campaign (and continues to be...).", "631" ], [ "> Time is needed to build support and work out details.\n\nAnd Parliament has had three years in total, several months since the last extension (where it decided to have its Easter recess just before the exit date and then the summer recess..). The argument that there wasn't enough time doesn't hold up at all, the issue isn't time the issue is consensus.\n\n > <PERSON> can do a lot (or not a lot) between now and the 14th with out Parliament being able to challenge him on it. Parliament has to be able to react to events.\n\n<PERSON> can't legislate and it has time once Parliament is back to challenge him on anything he has done with the Powers granted to him by Parliament. And again, Parliament could have removed him in the interim too.", "236" ], [ "It's not is it? As a start, vaping isn't smoking and smoking seems to be in a continuous decline (and rightly faces a rather hostile environment both socially and legally). Vaping as an alternative seems to have the same sort of 'cool' factor as anything else with linked to adulthood and possibly a little of the illicit allure that drugs, tobacco and alcohol have. \n\nIt is however odd to see people vaping who didn't smoke before, although to a certain extent that is a question of personal choice and perception.", "568" ], [ "The UK IIRC only got rid of it fully with the 1981, Germany, Greece, Ireland (for a range of odd reasons...), Spain and others have shed it as they have modified their approaches to nationality too.\n\nYou can probably argue that citizenship and nationality simply weren't very important for large periods of time and so common law (in those jurisdictions) created an automatic grant and statute law took time to appear as it was required.", "773" ], [ "> This makes a complete mockery of our parliamentary democracy system.\n\nHow? This process is the courts reviewing the use of a power that forms part of our Parliamentary Democracy. That is absolutely right and proper.\n\n > And this guy and the government are not being truthful. \n\nDo you have any evidence whatsoever to support that at all? And I mean, this is the supreme court looking at an issue, with two rather well qualified individuals making the case for and against... If he is being untruthful then that is for the court to decide...\n\n > You can read all my other comments if you'd like to understand a bit more.\n\nI've skimmed them, I can't quite see, other than thinking the government doesn't have a case, what your issue is.", "593" ], [ "> 'the conferences were planned for that date and couldn't be moved' is such a cop out.\n\nIt's not a cop out, it's factual. The conferences were organised, tickets sold, venues booked and so on. Again this is a repeat of the issue last Easter where MP's were expected to cancel their recess (for far less of a reason..) and then didn't. The idea that suddenly MP's were going to cancel conferences is pretty out there.. Throw in that a prorogation was still necessary (and so would have to come after even a shortened recess) and it gets you no further.\n\nEven more absurdly, no-one is even half suggesting what MP's have been unable to do given the loss of the days they lost.. It's not like they are champing at the bit to revoke, agree a deal or anything else.\n\n > What would they have done if the conference centre burned down? Cancelled the conference? Like hell they would, they'd find another venue.\n\nYes... But I'm not sure how that's relevant.", "236" ], [ "I often drive a route that takes me through a pass, over the top of some moors and back down again onto a plain and you end up with some very beautiful, but also really odd phenomena because of the way you enter and leave (and rise above..) cloud layers. There is something really odd about emerging from a clout layer into glorious sunshine, only to drop back into it, or where there is a low cloud, driving from a sunny day and blue sky into 15m visibility.\n\nThat said, this is an awesome photo, my dashcam never does similar situations any justice.", "362" ], [ "> You're under a false impression. \n\nNo, I don't think I am.\n\n > He only has two ways out; a deal approved by parliament, or no deal. \n\nA deal approved by Parliament, no-deal approved by Parliament or no offer of an extension from the EU IIRC.\n\n > Parliament has legislated against a no deal,\n\nIt has legislated to require an extension, it can't outright legislate against no-deal without further amending the Withdrawal Act and arguably revoking A50. No-deal is still the default after all. The PM does have to seek and accept an extension if he can't get a deal, or get Parliament to agree to a no-deal exit though.\n\n > and he's prorogued until the 14th October, barely two weeks before the deadline, and only 5 days before the statute demands he appeal for an extension. He has no negotiation team to speak of, as confirmed by multiple members of the EU. When they say \"We will leave no matter what\" the \"what\" is that legislation. They've locked themselves out of forming a deal.\n\nAnd he has repeatedly suggested he'd bring back some mildly modified version of May's WA and that he wants to leave with a deal in place.\n\nThere is, as I said, no-one saying that the PM will break the law, that is being implied by assuming (likely rightly..) that Parliament won't vote for a no-deal exit, and (somewhat more ambiguously) that no-deal can be agreed by Parliament in time to leave on the 31st.", "236" ], [ "Here is the quote:\n\n > And, asked if it was “remotely conceivable” that a second [prorogation](_URL_0_) would be ordered – if the [Supreme Court](_URL_1_) forces a recall of parliament – said the political situation was simply too volatile to make predictions. \n > \n > “For me to sit here and imagine what might happen at end of October, I think, is idle,” Mr <PERSON> said. \n > \n > “What I do know is that, if we are able to, we will have a Queen’s Speech in mid-October.”\n\nThat reads to me something along the lines of 'if the Court decided that the current prorogation was unlawful, the PM might have to prorogue in order to get a Queens Speech and new session, but I don't want to speculate', without wanting to suggest that the court might act in that way.", "236" ], [ "> 1) No Deal is no deal, regardless of how it's reached.\n\nSure, but <PERSON> can't at this point simply not request an extension, so no-deal is only possible with either Parliamentary consent, or the lack of an extension from the EU. It's not something <PERSON> can seek as such, or cause to occur unilaterally.\n\n > 2) Parliament has legislated against no deal in as much as it will not allow a no deal Brexit at the currently stated date without appeal for a further extension.\n\nYes, so it has legislated for an extension, it can't legislate against no-deal without revoking or amending the Withdrawal agreement. Arguably, the legislation that Parliament has passed still leads to a no-deal,\n\n > Trying to nitpick so you can defend these machinations doesn't stand you in good stead, or constitute a defence of your position. \n\nI'm not nitpicking, it's really important to be clear that Parliament has not legislated against no-deal, as it does not have a majority to do so, otherwise it would have.\n\n > clear in the intention behind the Act in question, the prevention of an imminent no deal Brexit.\n\nYes, but only so far as to demand an extension, not so far as to actually legislate to prevent a no-deal.\n\n > <PERSON> can't mildly modify anything without EU also approving it,,and every indication from the EU is that still no deal has been reached between them, and even if it had, it would be impossible to even begin the process on our end without parliament sitting, which won't be until at least October 14th. So <PERSON> has 5 sitting days to complete a Queen's Speech with a minority government, and pass a bill that's already failed three times, which the speaker might not even ALLOW to be brought, given his prior resistance to such a move.\n\nSure, but again, it seems that <PERSON> wants to bring back <PERSON>'s WA with minor modifications, it would need the EU's approval. The new session is at least in part required for that to come back at all (hence the prorogation..).\n\n > The suggestion that he will ignore the law was floated, carefully, to multiple outlets, by multiple ministers, for exactly this reason; to prep for the inevitable without it being a shock when he does it, to minimise the effect when he does.\n\nI'd argue that the notion that he will ignore the law is largely being pushed by the remain side to counter the claims being made that the UK will leave on the 31st (which in turn is being used to gain BXP support..). The reality is that no government source has said that the PM will breach the law, but rather that the UK will leave on the 31st (by legal means).", "236" ], [ "> legally <PERSON> can't simply not request an extension. Practically he just has to not do what's legally required of him.\n\nAnd no-one is suggesting he will break the law.\n\n > Which is exactly what we were meant to be discussing, and you're trying to pretend can't happen.\n\nI'm pointing out that no-one has said he'd break the law in the way you are suggesting, the claims are that the UK will leave on the 31st, not that he will try to avoid the impact of the Benn Act, not least because there would be time to force the issue before the UK leaves.", "236" ], [ "> The problem is that Brexit is, in itself, contradictory.\n\nBroadly it isn't. At it's core it's a question about whether the UK should pool its sovereignty with other countries and so have a say in a large block that in turn has more power than the UK (or any of the individual members) has, but where each member is constrained by the others or whether it shouldn't and so be fully able to exercise the smaller degree of power it has outside of a block. You can throw in that the question of political union itself is quite relevant there. In that context you can argue to remain or leave in a perfectly consistent manner.\n\nAs to your points:\n\n > It promised to increase the UK's self-determination by formally reasserting sovereignty. However, in practice, the UK's loss of influence and power after Brexit will limit the scope in which this self-determination can be exercised.\n\nThat's the trade off, it's not a contradiction. Reasserting the sovereignty currently delegated to the EU is reasonable, the loss of a say in the influence of the EU (remember the UK is part of the EU, not all of it, it does constrain action) is a cost of that.\n\n > It promised economic improvement by creating economic inefficiencies in the form of trade and travel barriers.\n\nSort of, it promised the potential for improvement in external trade by having specific trade agreements and being better able to propose and conclude them rapidly. That's probably true, the UK will be better placed to conclude agreements at all with the likes of the US and possibly China than the EU is, it'll have less leverage than the EU would if it does, but then it'll also not be pooling pooling market access and so constraints either.\n\n > It promised less foreigners in the UK, but without considering that these foreigners fill vital roles in society.\n\nIt promised an end to freedom of movement and that looks to be the case, immigration policy at that point will be wholly domestic. The 'take back control' element there is valid, it leaves immigration policy entirely in the hands of parliament, subject to popular opinion and economic requirements as part of that.\n\n > It promises increased efficiency by removing the institutions of Brussels and replace them by equivalent, if smaller and thus more costly, institutions in the UK.\n\nTo be fair that's a bit of a daft one, a huge number of EU institutions are coordinating institutions with regulators in member states still operating and doing most of the heavy lifting. The loss on leaving the EU isn't so much institutional for the UK, it's that rather than being part of a pan-national regulatory framework it'll be a much smaller one.\n\n > All of these promises contain severe internal contradictions. It is impossible to formulate a coherent policy that implements them. It is therefore impossible to negotiate a treaty that delivers them.\n\nPeople voted leave for a slew of different reasons (and people voted remain for a slew of different reasons too for that matter), any policy approach to leaving the EU is going to require compromise, much as remaining in the EU at this point would mean a UK government taking an approach to the EU that is a compromise (the UK would have to block further integration for example and be more bullish in both using its say to direct the EU while remaining on the periphery, which realistically means becoming ever more of a barrier to the EU's institutional aims than it has been..). A coherent policy is entirely possible, the issue right now is finding a majority in Parliament to move in that direction, because it does require compromise.", "631" ], [ "> Plenty of people are suggesting he may break the law.\n\nThe initial argument was that people in government, or government mouthpieces were making that suggestion... That's rather different. Yes, lots of people are indeed suggesting he may break the law, although most of them from the remain side it would seem, as part of the '<PERSON> is breaking all the laws!' thing.\n\n > That discussion didn't come out of nowhere, nor is it fearmongering.\n\nIt's spin.\n\n > It's a direct result of his refusal to state that he will abide by parliaments decision, but instead insist that \"we will leave no matter what.\"\n\nAnd it is people reading into that whatever they feel meets their narriative, which is why he's using it. It doesn't suggest he'll break the law though, it suggests he is working toward taking the UK out, legally, by the 31st.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n", "236" ], [ "> But I think you are misleading people by saying birthright citizenship was in any way common or usual in Europe.\n\nI don't, for a very long time being born or living within the boundaries of a state effectively made you a citizen of that state, the modern need to manage citizenship properly is somewhat recent, the concept is ancient enough, the practice less so. People didn't have ID, they didn't have passports, they were recorded in city, town and parish registers as being born or living in an area without much regard for their citizenship as such. Women often didn't hold citizenship separately from their hustbands/fathers.\n\nIt's only relatively recently (the last 100 years or so) that birthright wouldn't have meant automatic citizenship in most European countries.", "914" ], [ "> It is difficult to argue properly against vague statements but in many european countries, nations, even historically, before the birth of the concept of citizenship, not everybody born there was equally native. Think of jews, or roma people or other ethnic minorities settled in foreign countries. And birth being registered did not necessarily make them citizens, if citizens was even a concept. Even right now, a birth might be registered but registering a birth does not give citizenship to the child bortn.\n\nNo I completely agree, and you also had analogues for citizenship (including class, professional associations and guilds, and more local arrangements essentially relating more to the jurisdiction of the local authority (often nobility, but sometimes a town or even church..) than the state.\n\nThe point being that all modern citizenship stems from those and the rights we normally associate with citizenship (to the extent that they existed..) applied then too. And some of this lasted into the late 1800's and early 1900's so it's not some 'ancient' or distant thing with no relevancy.\n\nThere are some really interesting questions around nomadic groups and long established, but still deemed foreign groups (Jews being a great example, but not the only one...), especially if you look at port cities and so on.", "818" ], [ "That's not really true either though is it? The PM can prorogue Parliament but can't govern in the absence of it, and (as per the government argument..) Parliament can prevent prorogation or legislate to shift the power. Essentially if the SC rules that PM's can prorogue Parliament based on practical and political considerations we are exactly where we have been.\n\nThe issue now is only really interesting because Parliament legislated for one thing, but now doesn't want the default outcome of that legislation to come to pass, while also not wanting to change the legislation.. It's a wierd impasse.", "236" ], [ "> sure, which is why I think it is a misleading statement to say Europe had birthright citizenship till recently. On the contrary, I think as the concept of citizenship got established, European nations mainly used jus sanguinis, apart maybe from nations with complicated border issues maybe.\n\nI think possibly the issue here might be the definition of recently.. I'd take that to mean the last 100 years or so, if you are using it to mean the last 30 years or so I'd agree with that last statement..", "842" ], [ "> That is him suggesting that he will break the law if he fails to get a deal.\n\nNo, it's him suggesting that he doesn't want to extend and will do whatever he can to avoid it...\n\n > He has said that deal or no deal we're leaving on the 31st of October \"no matter what\". So no matter if he gets a deal through or not, no matter if parliament somehow agrees no deal, no matter if it's legal or not - no matter what. That means he'd have to break the law.\n\nExcept he clearly believes he won't have to. Again, inferring that he'd break the law makes no sense, not least because he won't be in a position to.\n\n > I know he hasn't uttered the words \"I will break the law\" but we're all intelligent enough to put 2+2 together. Whether he actually will or not remains to be seen, but he's said that he will.\n\nExcept again, he hasn't. The only way you get there is if you discount the possibility of him taking the UK out of the EU on the 31st in compliance with the law, which is still far more likely than not.", "236" ], [ "To be fair, allowing students to go on strike seems to be somewhat beyond the point. I've made it clear to my kids that if they are going on the climate strikes (and they have been) then consent sort of defeats the point. They shouldn't need my consent to go on strike or indeed my encouragement nor should they need Schools consent. If school have an issue with it and take action then that is the cost of standing up for an issue they care about...\n\nSo far at least (and I am proud of them for it) they have gone, school has noted them as absent and we've had no major issues with school coming back at us or at them. And this way it feels like, and is \\*their\\* thing not something that we have pushed or are pushing.", "607" ], [ "> What do you mean he won't be in a position to?\n\nThe point at which he has to ask for an extension is well before the 31st, if it looks like he won't comply he can be compelled to, or someone else can do it in his place (with him facing all manner of potential consequences) making any resistance on his part pretty pointless.\n\n > No, you get there if you accept that it's possible he won't be able to take the UK out of the EU in compliance with the law. \n\nWhich remains to be seen.\n\n > He might be able to and he might not. It might be more likely, but it's still possible that he can't yet he said he'd take us out no matter what.\n\nIn which case he can't do that, at that point it is more likely that his statement will have been qualified, or arguably 'a lie' than that he will break the law to ensure it remains true.", "236" ], [ "> In most cases involving parliamentary proceedings, I would think along those lines as well, however in this particular case, parliament finds itself unable to legislate as it has been prorogued.\n\nIt has legislated.. The issue Parliament has with legislating in terms of brexit isn't that it has been prorogued, it's that it lacks consensus.\n\n > And as this seems to be the first time that this prerogative power has been used for this purpose, \n\nTo be fair, this is the first time Parliament has had an issue in that it doesn't want legislation it passed to come into effect, while simultaneously not wanting to repeal it or modify it to avoid an outcome that MP's apparently don't want.\n\n > parliament has not had time to legislate in order to prevent or set rules by which it can be used. \n\nI'm not sure that's particularly true, the notion that Parliament might be prorogued has been around for quite a while, indeed the Northern Ireland (Executive Formation etc) Act 2019 was supposed to limit it, and obviously there was an opportunity to legislate (and Parliament did) with the Benn Act.\n\n > The courts, it would seem, are the only way to hand power back to parliament in order to allow parliament to make a decision on this. They would be acting as a useful safety net in defending parliamentary sovereignty from unprecedented threats\n\nOnly if you assume that the power was ever taken away in the first place and that the courts are needed to return it.\n\n", "236" ], [ "> Yet, for many of us, we are not talking about \"other countries\" like some random fanclub - we are talking about fellow Europeans. The EU, for me, is the realisation of the efforts of generations of European thinkers who wished to see us work together as one federation with a common set of principles shaped by Enlightenment thought.\n\nSure, and I assume that's why you voted remain. But again, for quite a lot of people (me included) I don't want to see the UK remain in a deep and broad political union with aims I don't particularly subscribe to. European cooperation in a slew of areas? Sure. Deep economic ties? Absolutely. The ability to live and work in other parts of Europe easily? Again, no problem with that. But I don't like the idea of political integration, I don't like a regionalist view over a more global one, I have issues with the structures and direction of the EU as a political project, and it would seem I'm not alone. In that context being in the EU is more problematic than being outside of it and forging a close relationship with it (and that was true in the context of the UK's existing membership on the periphery, which to a certain extent was becoming untenable..).\n\nMy point is that your view is broadly one of two, both are valid, neither is contradictory. I'd also argue that your position is very much a minority view (even among remain supporters) rather than a majority view, and that's pretty important in terms of our democracy.\n\n", "437" ], [ "> I get your point, but in a seat like mine which is something like 60% Tory and 30%, it wouldn't have the same influence as the \"spectacle\" would of the main event.\n\nPossibly, but it might also mean that some of the third party candidates get to put pressure on the main ones, not least that the spectacle tends to then override local considerations and your MP's actual views..\n\n > And of course, it shouldn't be about that, but I could go and see my local hustings - these events are just more fun I guess, but it's not much fun if it's just the same 2 angry old men slugging it out.\n\nAlso true, but that's who you get to vote for.\n\n", "207" ], [ "For the same reason that people come to conclusions on things like the NHS or welfare on ideological grounds, peoples positions are informed by preference. If we are honest, most parties want a better UK the difference is in what they see as 'better' and how they want to get there. I'd assume that Labour, the Tories, the Lib Dems and everyone else want better healthcare, lower crime, better education, people in work, higher wages, less need for social support and so on, people however tend to vote on the basis of the ideological approach that gets them there..\n\nThe EU's political aims are pretty divisive in a UK context, most people (including a huge slew of remainers) aren't particularly happy with the notion of a closer union, preferring a looser one of cooperation, in that context surely its not absurd or outrageous that some people see being outside of a union that they don't support the aims of as a preferred outcome?", "564" ], [ "> if you look to the beginning of our conversation, we're discussing whether there is 'a serious case' for leaving\n\nYes...\n\n > that means it needs to have serious support for the position\n\nAnd last time I checked this did have serious support... Indeed it was one of the major factors that led to leave being the outcome of the 2016 referendum and why the UK is leaving the EU.\n\nI've lived in Germany and France (and I speak German and can just about get by in French...) and the attachment to the EU in the UK is very different from the views in both of those countries. That has led to support for the UK not to be part of the EU. It's largely about what the EU is and what it represents, as well as its aims and ambitions. That gets tied into things like common EU foreign and defence policy, freedom of movement in the context of the four freedoms and so on.\n\nRealistically one of the most solid arguments made by the remain campaign during the referendum was the notion that the UK could remain in the EU and see reform (or reform its membership), that brought along quite a lot of people who don't really like what the EU is or does, but like aspects of it (And reform was vague enough to offer almost anything in that regard). Indeed 6 years or so ago I'd have supported remaining in and reforming the EU (that was somewhat quashed because I ended up doing some work with MEP's from Germany and EU institutions..).", "564" ], [ "Volume to a large degree. Essentially the bigger the market, the more sellers there are if you are buying, and buyers there are if you are buying, so you have enough supply and demand to satisfy everyone and a single market to do it in. \n\nThrow in secondary markets and it becomes a question of size and stability with no single actor able to move or make the market. There are additional benefits of things like institutional stability, legal certainty and (don't laugh..) political stability around the financial service sector too.", "976" ], [ "> When one country demands changes the rest don't want, you don't get to cry \"unreformable\".\n\nNo, but you do get to argue that the reform that the UK, or a significant portion of people in the UK are interested in (which tends to be a little varied, but away from closer integration) isn't viable. It's a bit silly to argue that the EU being capable of reform, but not in the direction that the UK seems to want means it is reformable in the context of that debate.", "437" ], [ "> you can't cite a 'serious' case behind the 2016 referendum using the 2016 referendum, given the narrowness of margin and tactics used by leave\n\nSorry.. Why? Even if it were a minority view it'd still be significant and serious.\n\n > so get rid of murdoch\n\nBit late for that isn't it? And that assumes that the <PERSON> press aren't largely mirroring and pandering to existing political positions. Lets also not ignore that the bulk of the opposition to the EU over the last few decades has come from the right not the left, and that it is only relatively recently that that shifted.", "564" ], [ "> I think 50k spent on a single project could be an overlooked declaration or misfiling. They were punished all the same as they should be.\n\n£50k is a fairly major breach, but you are right that administrative fuck ups happen, as do 'creative' attempts to meet the letter of the law. They should be dealt with appropriately and the EC should have the powers required to make sure they don't happen again and to sanction those involved.\n\nWe shouldn't be treating any of this lightly and overspending by one group can't justify it from another.", "712" ], [ "> because of the disinformation pumped out by leave\n\nThat might make sense if the referendum had been a low point in support for remaining, but it wasn't.. Indeed you can hardly look at the last 40 years and conclude that the UK has always been massively supportive of the EU as a project. Indeed the high point of support appears to have been the referendum in the 70's that ratified our joining.\n\n > too late? no\n\nIt would seem that it's a bit late given the level of opposition there is to EU membership.\n\n > <PERSON> isn't left-wing, so i'm not sure what your final point is supposed to mean\n\nThat's the point.. Left-wing opposition to the EU has been around longer, and for a long time was the larger component of opposition to the EU, and it certainly wasn't driven by the <PERSON> press.\n\nThe issue with the EU is that it isn't something that aligns well with what a lot of people in the UK, left and right support. There are a fair number of people who will tolerate it for the perceived economic benefits, but even among remain voters, support for the EU on the basis of the EU's only came to about 15% of voters reasons for voting the way they did (the largest chunk wanted to avoid the potential economic impact of leaving).", "564" ], [ "> it makes sense, full stop\n\nNo, it doesn't, which is why I pointed out the flaw in that argument.\n\n > nope. unless you want to allow him to continue to destroy democracy\n\nYour argument is what, that we ignore things that we think may be positions pushed by <PERSON> where the public support them, in the name of protecting democracy?\n\n > you just wrote the opposite: Lets also not ignore that the bulk of the opposition to the EU over the last few decades has come from the right not the left, and that it is only relatively recently that that shifted.\n\nYou are right, I screwed that up (it's 0030 after all) it should have read:\n\nLets also not ignore that the bulk of the opposition to the EU over the last few decades has come from the **left** not the **right**, and that it is only relatively recently that that shifted.\n\n > there's no 'tolerating' the eu. even then, the trouble is people don't realise what the eu actually is and / or does\n\nIndeed, there isn't, hence the UK leaving. And I agree that a lot of people don't know what the EU is and or does, but those that do aren't exclusively on the remain side either. Indeed I leaned toward remain until I spent more time having to understand what the EU is, what it does and how it works.", "437" ], [ "The answer to all of the above is anti-vaxx, support for leaving the EU has a reasonable amount of support given the issue and has had for most of the time the UK has been in the EU, it doesn't exist because of lies, but because of a difference in political opinion, leaving the EU certainly has costs, but it's not without benefits in terms of competencies exercised by the UK rather than the EU and while there are some cult like zealots who support leaving (and remaining, and the Tories, UKIP, BNP, Greens, Labour, Lib Dems and likely everything else..) it's a minority.\n\nBut feel free to continue.", "564" ], [ "Absolutely. But the Lib Dems pushed and supported a referendum on EU membership, the argument being that the normal political process couldn't deliver an answer and Parliament needed to take advice. Reversing that without another vote is problematic. They'd be entitled to do so, but they would almost certainly be seen as anti-democratic for doing so, much as <PERSON> would be seen as failing to have a mandate for taking the UK out of the EU with no-deal by a large number of people, without explicit support.", "564" ], [ "True, although looking now the prices aren't much lower, in fact a cursory look still leaves me without somewhere for $50/night. The closest I can get is the Travel Lodge at £47/night and one guest house at £55.\n\nI assume that the USAF get some negotiated discounts though so they may well do better than the posted rates (and if they aren't, they should be..).", "610" ], [ "Right... OK. \n\nSo lets start at the beginning.\n\nIt was <PERSON>, a Tory Prime minister who pushed the UK toward the EEC in the early 60's on the basis that the UK would be worse off outside in the long term. At that time Labour was the major Eurosceptic element with the likes of <PERSON> opposing membership, and indeed decrying the EU as a federal project.\n\nThen it was <PERSON>, another Tory PM who took the UK into the EU with Labour split, although largely against membership. It was then a Labour PM in the form <PERSON> who, under pressure from the left, promised to put the issue of membership to a referendum, after a renegotiation of Britain’s membership terms (sound familiar?).\n\nHe allowed his own ministers, notably <PERSON> and <PERSON> to campaign against membership, while most of the Tory press backed staying in, indeed the Daily Mail, Daily Telegraph, Daily Express, the Sun (A Murdoch paper at the time), the Times, the Financial Times and so on backing membership...\n\nThen we had <PERSON> who campaigned to stay in the EEC in 1975 and who signed off on the Single European Act in 1986 who was hardly a Eurosceptic as such. She was a 'reformer' but at least as 'pro-EU' as <PERSON> et al in 2015. She wasn't however a federalist, and so you started to see a shift in Tory views of the EU in the mid 80s.\n\nOn the other side you had <PERSON> pushing a social Europe, but he faced opposition from both the unions, Labours left and the likes of <PERSON>.\n\nThen you hit the 90's the ERM disaster, <PERSON><PERSON>' and the birth of modern, right wing Euroscepticism, along side 'traditional' left wing opposition to what was seen as (and arguably is..) a capitalist driven neo-liberal economic project. Amusingly you had the likes of <PERSON> and <PERSON> on the right now pushing a very different euro-sceptic narriative.\n\nThen we have <PERSON> and <PERSON> both pro-EU, anti Euro, anti- having the EU as a domestic issue (not surprising given what happened with <PERSON>). At this point the EU gets effectively removed (bar some noise around the Euro and Labours three tests) from public debate. Even expansion isn't really discussed or seen as a domestic policy issue. In response you see a nascent UKIP fail to make headway until the end of Labours time in government.\n\nSo assuming you have no major issues with that, I think we can see a broad pattern in terms of scepticism on both the left and the right, with it being more mainstream on the left until <PERSON>, relatively 'bipartisan' within the minority groupings of both the major parties through the 90's and early 00's leading to UKIP building the issue into a public one and then a right wing surge in Euroscepticism (and a left wing decline somewhat).", "564" ], [ "> Because it makes it settled law that the Executive can, at any time, for spurious reasons, (and therefore for any reason) suspend the Legislature, making the Legislature a plaything and playground of the Executive, fundamentally overturning the Constitutional balance of the government towards the office of the Prime Minister, whom, in the absence of Parliament (who's absence the PM can mandate) has no political accountability whatsoever.\n\nExcept it doesn't do that does it? Parliament can legislate against prorogation, the executive can't legislate without the rest of Parliament and the constitutional balance doesn't shift at all absent a decision (because the status-quo remains). If anything a lack of action in 1997 would arguably mean this has been the situation for more than two decades without it ending representative democracy.\n\nAnd just as an aside tin the absence of Parliament he office of the Prime Minister may well lack political accountability, but it also lacks the ability to act...\n\nThe current situation is somewhat unique because Parliament doesn't want legislation it passed to come into effect but also doesn't want to repeal it or modify it significantly. That's an edge case and a half to be using to decry the end of representative democracy in the UK..", "236" ], [ "> The thing is, political manifesto should be able to be changed. \n\nAbsolutely, and they do. Although obviously if you win an election based on a given manifesto you should probably aim to deliver on it and not change it significantly without going back to the people..\n\n > This is obviously a change in lib dem policy but if somebody votes for Lib Dem to repeal A50, why is that any different to the BXP claiming to leave without a deal?\n\nIt's not, both would however, in the context of the referendum, lack legitimacy, arguably the Lib Dem position a bit more given it completely reverses the intent of the referendum outcome, and a Lib Dem mandate (Even if they gain a majority in Parliament) will fall short of the mandate from the referendum. In that context a second referendum would be seen as more legitimate.\n\n > At the end of the day, we live in a representative democracy, not a direct democracy. The referendum was always a guiding vote, not a binding one. (as every referendum has been). Especially if there is a general election i don't see an issue with the LD position.\n\nI agree entirely, but that doesn't mean that the perception of acting in that way won't be negative.\n\n > If the Conservative Party did the same thing right now, without say <PERSON> who at least won a plurality of seats then yes, I could see the argument against a choice of the people but the Lib Dems haven't faced an election since announcing this policy and are obviously running on it heavily\n\nIndeed, and lets face it, they aren't going to come close to a majority, not even a fourth place in terms of seats, but you can see that even without it being a realistic likelihood it has (as people have suggested) simply polarised positions further and seems to have done some damage to the idea that the Lib Dems are democrats first.. Oddly it seems to have been more damaging than the earlier statement by <PERSON> that she wanted a second referendum, but would (essentially..) ignore anything other than a remain result in terms of how she'd vote.\n\n > So personally for that reason I don't think it's any more of a problem than for instance <PERSON> running on a team privatisation platform without a referendum (which obviously there wouldn't be on that topic).\n\nI'd argue that'd be true as long as there hadn't been a referendum in which a 'team anti-privatisation' had won in the resent past, and after which team anti-privatisation hadn't seen their position implemented despite promises to do so. Although just for the record, even though such a referendum would be very unlikely, I doubt that team anti-privatisation would win any such referendum in the first place..", "564" ], [ "> Depends on how long Proguement lasts. I don't think there's anything against Proguing Parliament for half a decade oh look new Elections.\n\nEven in that, fairly absurd scenario, you'd be left with a PM who couldn't legislate, or govern, the absence of a Budget and indeed the passing of the annual Finance Act would be problematic to say the least, then you have a slew of statutory obligations that the PM couldn't meet.\n\nIn short, it isn't a credible risk, and to get to this being a problem you have to go off the deep end with 'what ifs'. The equivalent would be to suggest that the Queen could use her discretionary powers in lots of odd ways, they are there after all, curtailed somewhat over the decades, but still present, but she doesn't..\n\nSo again, even if the SC rules in favour of the government (which it probably will do and likely should, although it'll be interesting to see where it goes later today) it doesn't even slightly risk our representative government, and doesn't go anywhere near ending it.", "236" ], [ "Some places did (and likely will if there are issues again this time around). I'd assume it's a bit of a pain in the arse for the shops though and they are better off simply having additional stock where they can. \n\nIt's also a bit hit and miss, not only can it lead to issues with customers being arsey, but it also creates real problems for people with larger families who are trying to reduce the number of times tey shop a week (During the last lock down, our local Aldi had limits on tinned goods, you could buy 2x of anything, same on UHT milk and a few other bits. That effectively meant my weekly shop for 6 people involved 3 trips rather than one). Obvious hoarding might be easier to detect but given you also have people shopping for vulnerable people and all the rest of it, as well as people not just filling a trolley with loo roll but buying 48 rolls when they'd usually buy 12.", "616" ], [ "Oddly enough the UK exceeds the EU minimums in many areas as it is, the risk isn't that the UK drops domestic standards, its that imports don't need to meet UK standards (which by the way is already a thing as part of the EU, the UK bans the production of foie gras for example, because it's pretty damn cruel, but can't ban the import as an EU member.", "631" ], [ "> I don't remember a single thing <PERSON> has said about this and he's had months to do it, not just him and his team but labours PR operation in totality.\n\nReally? That's odd. \n\n > <PERSON> is a regional mayor, it's not really relevant to most people in the UK what he says.\n\nIt's relevant that he said it, that it was extremely visible and that people who are not usually interested in following politics were aware of it.\n\n > What is labours attack line on this?\n\nThat the Government should extend the furlough.. \n\n > Edit: I just googled 'Starmer furlough' and got a single news item from multiple sources for mid September. That is not effective opposition.\n\nHe's been talking about it since before it ended, there are headlines from July through to September, then headlines about financial support for the local lockdowns equivalent to the national ones in March.", "365" ], [ "Yeah, we banned production but generally as an EU member you can't create barriers to selling goods within the single market (except under some pretty specific circumstances, and even then it can be challenged and some categories of goods..). That is after all the whole point of the single market, that producers can sell their stuff to anyone in the market and that the benefits of the much larger market outweigh the costs of member states losing the ability to directly regulate large chunks of their internal markets as a result.", "631" ], [ "You can suggest whatever you want, but I'm not sure why you are expecting campaigns rather than opposition. Labour needs to hit the Tories on every issue and point out what should be happening, ask questions about why things aren't happening and present an alternative. \n\nThat is opposition, the 'campaign' in that context is that Labour are more competent than the Tories, running specific campaigns on each issue and turning governance into pithy soundbites is less useful outside of election periods, than being see to be competent and capable of governance.", "365" ], [ "I've only looked at this in the context of clubs, but the answer is likely 'maybe', the point to start is the specific sports governing body though, the good ones will lay out what funding is available and how it can be accessed. Sport England are also worth reaching out to, and while you are right that a lot of funding streams dropped off because of Covid not all did and there is a lot less going on so there may be less competition for the same pots of money.\n\nIt'd help to know which sport though..", "423" ], [ "Odd, I've seen it work more often than not, with the winner of pretty much every election I can remember being the one the public though could actually govern, not the one that ran the most campaigns.. Election campaigns are important obviously, because they let you highlight the failures again, but if people don't see the issues already they won't get you very far.\n\nIt's not that far off what people have been complaining about with Brexit, it wasn't the final campaigns that ensured a Leave win, it was long term work pointing out the issues and suggesting that the alternatives were viable. I've been on, and no doubt will continue to go to protests, I've campaigned in elections and on issues and I've canvassed and it all helped to some degree, but it was never effective unless the rest of the work was done too. And in that context I've probably achieved more in terms of actual change with consultation responses, and credible opposition to daft ideas... It works.", "564" ], [ "> There is a reason that <PERSON> has been more successful than the official opposition and it's because of campaigns. That you think that is below what politics is shows the weakness in a technocratic approach to opposition.\n\nSorry, I don't think campaigns are below politics, but I do think that people get campaign fatigue and that there is a demand for governance. Campaigns aren't a substitute for being seen as capable and competent, being seen as competent isn't a substitute for good ideas, and both good ideas and being seen as broadly competent isn't a substitute for being able to campaign.\n\nMy point is that not everything should be a campaign, sometimes it is really, really important to be able to show that you could govern effectively. The Party's aim is after all to replace the current government, it is not an endless stream of single issues..\n\nCampaigns work when you can bring a critical mass and momentum to an issue and where the Government can't cut the knees out from under it by simply taking the issue on as their own and 'solving' it for you. Opposition works when the Government can be pushed to do something it appears not to want to do, and you can show that they were wrong and you were right..", "736" ], [ "The Tories have been in power for more than a decade and frankly <PERSON>' lot aren't any more the Disaster Capitalist Team than the last lot were. I mean given <PERSON> has a relatively solid majority, and given you are assuming he's aiming for a no-deal EU exit (based on the above..) and mass deregulation, why didn't he start there with his 80 seat majority? He could have legislated already, it'd have guaranteed the EU wouldn't do a deal regardless of what the UK said and apparently would have ticked all of <PERSON>' boxes..\n\nAh, yes.. It's because the Tories aren't actually Disaster Capitalists under <PERSON>, and they have both political and practical concerns, not least with the people who vote for them, and the notion of reducing food standards is pretty universally seen as a negative, which is why the Government have worked so hard to repeat that they don't intend to drop them.. (It's also why food standards is a really good skewer to attack the government with, and we should continue to do so, it maintains that pressure and makes any moves in that direction unlikely..).", "365" ], [ "> Ok do let me know when we see either from this incarnation of labour. They could have owned this topic, sick pay in the context of covid, free school meals, any of it. They look as though they need to focus group any statement atm and no one will vote for that sort of weakness.\n\nI think we are seeing that from Labour now, but it's gong to take a while to bed in given where the public perception of the party was a short while ago...", "365" ], [ "No.. It really isn't, moreover the next GE is in 2024 (Although that might change if the FTPA is binned..) so obviously there is time to continue to improve public perception beyond the gains already made. If <PERSON> can present much of the <PERSON> economic strategy sensibly and continue to be seen as a competent leader then things are looking a hell of a lot brighter than they have been any time for most of the last decade.", "27" ], [ "I'm on Debian too, so this should all be relevant if your set up is broadly 'standard'.. Stop me if it isn't.\n\nSo to start off with it'd be useful to know how you've set your static IP, I'd assume via the network manager (so nmcli at the moment), if you've set it in /etc/network/interfaces then we'll do something different, but I'll start assuming nm.. I'm also assuming IPv4 so again, if you are doing something more interesting with IPv6 let me know.\n\nTo start, if you could provide the output of:\n\n nmcli device show | grep IP4\n\nThat'll tell us what your current (so static..) network configuration looks like. That command breaks down as 'nmcli' (network managers command line interface), being asked to 'show' the configuration of your network devices. That's being piped to 'grep', so will only show the bits relevant to your IPv4 config.\n\nIt should list your IP address, gateway, some route information, DNS server and hostname (and possibly a few other bits). I don't need the hostname..\n\nOnce you've done that, it'd be useful for you to change one of the machines back to DHCP rather than having a static address set, letting it grab an address, and running the same command again.\n\nAt that point we can work out whether the static address scheme is correct for what your current setup network likely is. From that it'll either be really clear what the problem is or that we need to look a little more closely at your set up.", "685" ], [ "> Yes it really is, labours support is draining away if you go by recent polling,\n\nErm.. Which polls are you reading? The long term trend since <PERSON> election has been positive, there is no trend showing support draining away unless you are looking at single polls in isolation.\n\n > not that I do, but anecdotally I know plenty of labour voters enraged by <PERSON>'s antics.\n\nI'm sure there are a few that are, although anecdotally most of the Labour voters I know don't seem particularly bothered, and are broadly happy with Labour.\n\n > His own ratings show he is popular with conservative voters but 'don't knows' are increasingly breaking negative. The more people see him the less they like him unfortunately.\n\nI don't think there is a trend to suggest that's true either and he has a solid positive approval rating.. Again, in terms of leadership, Labour is in a far better position in polling terms now than it has been in a long time, and again, there is a long way to go before we hit an election.", "365" ], [ "> Yougov personal approval tracker shows exactly the trends I described, \n\nIt doesn't though does it? \n\nTell you what [here is that data graphed](_URL_2_), with the Tory, Labour, Don't Know, and Overall approval/disapproval all in one place for you (I'll throw the data at the bottom so you can check it against the data if you want).\n\nSo, you said Labour's support is draining away, that wouldn't be reflected in Starmers personal polling, but we can see from the [Politico poll of polls](_URL_0_) that that's simply not true.. \n\nIn terms of personal approval and from the yougov data you referenced, he's also not seeing an issue personally either, those saying he is doing well has sat fairly solidly above 40%, moving around a bit, but with no significant trend, certainly no significant negative trend.\n\nAs to Conservative voters, he does have a relatively high personal approval rating (given that this is from people supporting the Tories..) but there is a mild uptick in disapproval in recent polling, but again, its hardly a trend (and looking back over the series, not unusual).\n\nAnd then on don't knows.. There clearly isn't a trend one way or the other unless you literally pick a high point and a low point..\n\n > I get the feeling there's no evidence that could shake your convictions though eh.\n\nI'm not sure why you'd come to that conclusion rather than the more obvious one that is that you don't have the evidence to support your position. The only way you can draw the conclusions you have is if you look at really short periods of specific movement, ignore wider polling and essentially pick the data to match what you are saying rather than coming to a conclusion based on the data.\n\n(If you want to compare to ensure I'm not presenting bullshit data, here is the source: _URL_3_ (and the direct link to the [data](_URL_1_))\n\n||10th May 2020|8th Jun 2020|6th Jul 2020|3rd Aug 2020|31st Aug 2020|28th Sep 2020|26th Oct 2020|\n:--|--:|--:|--:|--:|--:|--:|--:|\n|Tory (All Well)|34.00%|38.00%|38.00%|43.00%|38.00%|41.00%|35.00%|\n|Tory (All Bad)|25.00%|33.00%|37.00%|33.00%|37.00%|37.00%|47.00%|\n|Labour (All Well)|54.00%|71.00%|65.00%|69.00%|62.00%|64.00%|61.00%|\n|Labour (All Bad)|11.00%|8.00%|14.00%|11.00%|15.00%|18.00%|19.00%|\n|Don’t Know (All Well)|16.00%|53.00%|20.00%|32.00%|13.00%|44.00%|22.00%|\n|Don’t know (All Bad)|29.00%|5.00%|33.00%|7.00%|20.00%|18.00%|19.00%|\n|Overall (All Well)|40.00%|48.00%|46.00%|48.00%|43.00%|46.00%|44.00%|\n|Overall (All Bad)|17.00%|21.00%|23.00%|21.00%|25.00%|26.00%|31.00%|", "365" ], [ "Can you also confirm that I'm not <PERSON>? \n\nIn all seriousness, I was going to read through the service provisions before reading too much of the analysis to see what my take was first (And regardless of anything else, focus on data protections in trade is something that is going to only get more important so looking at these first moves by the UK to adopt an approach is pretty important, as is push back).\n\nReally someone, maybe some sort of non-political organisation with a little credibility in this area could make some noise about a broad consultation on how the UK should approach that generally... Because I can't see the political orgs doing it other than to make some noise from time to time..\n\nAnyway, good luck as always.", "236" ], [ "That'd be the 'I don't know if he's doing well or not' group, not the 'I don't know who I'd vote for' set... Don't knows are not 'increasingly braking negative' that's in the data tables, they aren't. The number of people who don't know whether Starmer is doing well or not can only be seen to be shifting to 'doing badly' on two (non consecutive) data points in that set... So you are either shifting what you are talking about or using a single data point to infer a trend....\n\nOut of interest, which is it?", "185" ], [ "To be honest, if you sit on this sub for any length of time you do repeatedly see polling from different polling organisations covering different periods that aren't really useful without looking at the trends (from the same questions, by the same pollsters obviously..).\n\nThat said, given you suggested earlier that I was holding a position contrary to the data available and now seem to be agreeing that it's not in the data I do wonder if you are maintaining your claim in the absence of any additional data and in the face of the above.\n\nAfter all I'd hate to suggest that no evidence that could shake your convictions.", "76" ], [ "> Edit - It was the Redfield Wilton leaders poll from 22nd Oct I was thinking of, and if you go further back his don't knows converting to disapprovals is a trend. Hell I can't stand him and <PERSON> thought he was ok in January.\n\nYou are taking the piss a bit here. Firstly by editing above the thread (where I wouldn't see it unless I looked) and pulling a single data point and then referencing earlier data that again doesn't show what you are claiming (the movements in approval are relatively small and move over short periods reacting to events, without there being a trend..).\n\n > Hell I can't stand him and <PERSON> thought he was ok in January.\n\nWhich is a great anecdote, but would suggest that no evidence is likely to shake your convictions at this point and that you are actively ignoring actual data and inferring things that don't exist in the data you are interested in.\n\nAnd as we all know, making decisions based on poor interpretations of data lead to shitty outcomes (or poor conclusions).\n\nYou might be right, maybe Starmer isn't making enough noise, maybe there should be more of a campaign feel to the approach the party is taking in opposition, but broadly I think it's probably more accurate to say that you'd prefer that, rather than to suggest that polling supports your feeling.", "249" ], [ "> It's more that I am putting my child to bed and you post too many things for me to respond to\n\nI'm pretty much just responding to your comments though, and you can wait.. There is no immediate need to reply after all (I just cooked tea for my lot and I'm responding when I have a moment so..)\n\n > I notice we aren't talking about the party's most recent polls for example.\n\nDepends, your data set from yougov and the Redfield Wilton polling you pointed are both a couple of weeks+ old, but it's hardly massively out of date. And it's not as though there are a slew of additional more recent data points that are being ignored. The Party polling on the other hand is up to date.\n\n > This is with an entirely sympathetic press and a government who have killed blah blah blah you know the rest. \n\nSure... But as we've seen, the government fucking up isn't enough in and of itself to lift Labour support, Labour needs to also be seen not fucking up, which it mostly has for the last few months. \n\n > I honestly think labour are dead on their current course,\n\nAnd oddly enough I disagree, <PERSON> isn't exactly who I'd want for Leader, although if the party retains much of the policy set from <PERSON> I'll be largely happy with a Labour government under <PERSON>. And that has to be the aim, a Labour government, we've had a decade of Tory governance after all.\n\n > unionist\n\nI'm not sure when Labour hasn't been unionist.. More to the point, supporting the union does not exclude support for self-determination..\n\n > pro-privatisation, pro austerity, pro landlord. \n\nHappily Labour isn't pro-pro-privatisation, pro-austerity or pro-landlord, so in terms of Labours 'course' that wouldn't seem to be part of it.\n\n > They are eagerly killing the voter coalition that got them closet in a decade.\n\nThey are looking to build enough support to get elected, because getting close doesn't help anyone.\n\n > Anyway I'm sure you think different.\n\nI do.", "365" ], [ "The reason renationalising schools is going to be a nightmare is that the Tories managed to do it in an incredibly destructive manner, selling off assets to the groups running the schools in a way that will make buying them back either massively expensive, or potentially impossible in some cases.. I'm not sure that Tory privatisation being hard to reverse is the same as Labour being pro-Privatisation though.", "365" ], [ "They could but they likely wouldn't. It'd be a nightmare.. If <PERSON> were able to legally hold on to power (the whole Contingent election scenario sometimes presented say) then there would be a real issue in the sense that <PERSON> would be the legal head of state based on the US's own legal order, saying otherwise would be meddling in the US's internal political affairs and obviously the US is a superpower and pretty important to a lot of western states. And in pure practical terms, if <PERSON> is able to govern, they have to take on that reality too.\n\nIt doesn't really bear thinking about.", "216" ], [ "> Really? I admittedly don't know much about UK politics but didn't <PERSON> help lead Brexit and push a law that the EU said was illegal under international law?\n\nHe did lead on Brexit (but Brexit was a broady cross party issue..) and his government has brought in legislation that could (if used in certain ways) breach the UK's obligations under the WA (which would likely lead to the EU making use of the dispute settlement elements of the WA..) so yes, it could break international law in the sense that any breach of a treaty technically does.\n\n > Genuinely interested in the British point of view.\n\nIt'd depend on who you talk to... But if you look at policy or ideology there isn't a lot to link them, <PERSON> seems to have liked <PERSON> rather a lot more than the reverse too (<PERSON> called <PERSON> unfit to be President for example). Policy wise, the Tories under <PERSON> have more in common with <PERSON> than <PERSON> and obviously <PERSON> refused to support <PERSON> (and actively counterd..) on things like the Iran deal, the Paris accords, China, Russia etc.. There has been a pretty conscious effort to link <PERSON> and <PERSON> in the UK though, that's largely because <PERSON> is so unpopular here that any association is pretty much a negative..", "236" ], [ "The UK is pulling out of a political union and will be as much of a competitor as any number of other countries that see the EU as an ally. The UK will remain dedicated to the defence of Europe both because of its own interests and NATO. The UK will remain a close international partner in other areas of foreign policy, as it has been. The UK will remain a close trading partner. The UK is not suddenly turning into an antagonistic regional power... The legacy of WWII was an end to most European countries using violence to solve border issues (and that was and continues to be threatened by the likes of Turkey and Russia even while the UK was in the EU), the UK isn't..\n\n > We are sowing the seeds for dismantling of UK. \n\nWe held an independence referendum in Scotland before the EU referendum was a thing because here was demand for it. Scots have a right to self-determination... I'm not sure how that's relevant though.\n\n > Not sure how more direct that can be.\n\nIt's not linked to the legacy of WWII for a start, it's not even linked to the legacy of WWII in Europe. You can make a better argument that in joining the EU the UK turned its back on those nations that contributed so much to the UK in WWII and that the EU is a vehicle for preventing war between France and Germany, not something to keep the UK from invading its neighbours.\n\nNot sure how more direct that can be.", "631" ], [ "> They would take a deep breath, talk to economists, look at financial forecasts... and congratulate <PERSON> on his second term.\n\nThey might have to, and they would be unlikely to do anything that directly undermines that 'formal' outcome. I'd expect to see a lot of divergence though, the US would have to be treated as an unstable country, there would effectively have to be a gradual move to insulate the rest of the world from the issues in the US and a move to supplant both the US and dollar given the risks..\n\nIt'd become massively more complex if <PERSON> didn't accept the outcome and if that led to outright splintering within the US though.", "134" ], [ "It depends partially on the boundary changes (which are unfortunately overdue and a fair division will favour the Tories...) and partially on whether <PERSON> can maintain momentum and pull both support and enthusiasm toward Labour. It's certainly not impossible (and between Covid and everything else, even in three years it's entirely possible the Tories trash their biggest selling points around competency..). \n\nA Labour/SNP coalition with a promise of a referendum seems somewhat less likely if only because there is no good outcome for Labour after that first term, doubly so if a referendum is close, or ends up with a leave result for Scotland.", "852" ], [ "> I don't know why the government aren't more willing to play brinkmanship here.\n\nBecause the UK benefits from being open to the EU, playing political games with access in this way would damage the attractiveness of the UK as a financial centre beyond any impact from the EU's decision, while the EU's approach essentially makes EU centres less attractive to anyone who doesn't have to use them, and more expensive for those who end up being required to..", "631" ], [ "And:\n\n > Analysis of tests shows younger and disadvantaged children hardest hit by school closures\n\nAlthough I'm not sure why it's shocking, it was effectively the cost of the lockdown, it has been repeatedly pointed out that it creates a disproportionate number of problems for the most disadvantaged and we've been talking for months about how far it set pupils back, and what the long term impact will be on social mobility. The Sutton Trust was putting stuff out in June.", "762" ], [ "You may want to provide a little more information on the terms. A quick look at their site suggests that there are no early repayment fees and that you can pay off the loan early, but also that there are arrangement fees and that they offer APR's ranging from 99% to 799% (so... Yeah) over a period of up to 24 months.\n\nJust for context, that APR range is massive, but if it shows you paying back $5600 over the period, then you are presumably having to pay around $233 a month, so an APR around 350%.. That's insane (Although 799% would be even more so...). You need to find out how much it'll cost you to pay it off now (or at least 'early'), which may vary depending on fees, and then raise that money somehow (as it'll be a lot less than the total you are looking to pay). Just don't get behind on your payments either, I can't imagine that would help.\n\n*Edit: Just realised why I ran into an issue with my APR calculator.. I'm in the UK which regulated in 2015 to protect customers from escalating debts, part of that (in addition to a maximum daily interest rate..) it created a cap on the total cost of the loan of 100% of the loan amount. That is to say that a borrower would never have to pay back more than double the initial amount borrowed.* \n\n*Obviously you have bigger issues right now, but you can see just how much of a problem escalating debt can be and how punitive this sort of lending is. If you are ever in a position to support/promote/encourage/lobby for or otherwise influence your state or national government into regulating that sort of lending effectively, do take the time to do it..*", "643" ], [ "> Scotland didn’t vote for independence before brexit. \n\nNo, it didn't, but there certainly was a lot of support (more than some expected), and of course Scotland hasn't left the union yet either.\n\n > Brexit has caused the likelihood for them to vote to leave the U.K. to increase, possibly tipped it over the edge. It’s a great example of where brexit has potentially triggered a huge change in the relationship, ultimately leaving them politically, socially and whatever distanced from the rest of the U.K.\n\nI think the last decade of Tory government likely did as much if not more, and arguably things were an issue a way before then too. Frankly a sensible devolution settlement would likely do more in that area than Eu membership.\n\n > Nobody is suggesting that war is about to break out, but that it is a historic event that can trigger a series of deteriorations in our relationship. That is what people are referring to, it’s not that hard to conceptualise.\n\nJust to be clear, the parent said:\n\n > > Large numbers of the UK population have already forgotten. They voted for the UK to leave the institutions of the EU, created for the express purpose of avoiding future war in Europe. That was the legacy of the fallen, now discarded by people who value the UK and the fallen lower than the time it would have taken them to check their facts. \n\nThe EU is a political project that has changed continually since it's predecessors were formed with an aim of preventing war in Europe between France and Germany, the idea that it is a betrayal of those who fought and died WWII to leave that political union, one the UK didn't really ever align with fully is patently false..", "852" ], [ "I don't see it as likely, but there are a couple of (unlikely..) routes that are in accordance with US law, at least on the face of it, that leave <PERSON> in power (essentially refusing to concede screwing with the verifications/electoral college vote so it ends up with Congress). It's just really unlikely.\n\n > I dont see this happening because American institutions are too solid when it comes to these matters I believe.\n\nThe impeachment process, the way appointments have been made to various courts and the sheer volume of political appointees within the Government sort of make that a little bit of a questionable claim. Essentially it hasn't really been tested much, and in the last four years, each time it has been tested it has failed as often as not. That said, if the election is seen as valid and the electoral college votes in line with the election (And so <PERSON> formally loses...) then I can't see him even attempting to stay on (he'll probably fling some shit, but it won't come to the Secret Service being forced to remove him.. I think...).", "554" ], [ "> It's not like they actually left it to the last minute and are now throwing their weight around.\n\nDepends on how you look at it, the stat is that the UK and US both spent about 7x per capita more on vaccination prep. A huge amount was spent by them on development (as it was by individual member states) support for producers, pre-orders and so on, the EU apparently prioritised value for money. Individual EU member states were ready to move earlier but didn't and the EU is using a more comprehensive approvals process. All in that does sort of amount to leaving things to the last minute (or at least later than many) and then wanting to be treated in the same way as everyone else, despite that delay presumably creating issues for producers and planners.", "374" ], [ "> I can see what you mean, still though the agreement with the company was made some time ago and wasn't really last minute.\n\nSure, but there is a fair bit of lead time with this, and development and all the rest of it. I get where the EU was coming from (this is a non-trivial cost after all) and it is moving forward as a block so you aren't leaving individual members behind, although I do wonder exactly what the 3 month delay was about (they apparently had an agreement pretty much ready to go as the UK did).\n\n > If we hadn't got in there first and essentially reserved the first 100m doses, this shit just wouldn't be going down.\n\nPretty much, even without getting in there first, if the EU were negotiating a contract at the same time as the other purchasers it'd at least have been factored in to everything else. As it was it came relatively late and after AZ appears to have made stronger commitments to other purchasers. And the EU appears (From what I've read..) to have taken a softer approach too, at least in part because producers wouldn't guarantee deliveries.\n\n > On the other hand... would it be right if I get one (being healthy and 'relatively' young) ahead of some vulnerable person in Greece?\n\nNo, I don't think so either. Then again, you could ask whether it's right that we get one (being healthy and relatively young) before someone more vulnerable (or even just more at risk) in Africa, South America, the US or the poorer parts of Asia either.", "374" ], [ "Generally the issue is the interaction between humans and nature, we move stuff, bring useful plants to new places (where they compete with the existing plants), introduce non-native animals on purpose or by accident and the end result is more of a need to manage things, especially if we want certain outcomes.\n\nAs to culling the human population, obviously that'd be pretty abhorrent and from most peoples perspective would be seen as both very different and far more unacceptable than managing animal populations.", "431" ], [ "> Personally, I would forego my vaccine and spend longer in lockdown to make sure people most at risk get it first, their location is irrelevant to me.\n\nThere is a mildly selfish element in it for me in the sense that I'd really really rather not catch it and spread it to my other half and kids (and so being vaccinated when those at greater risk seems pretty key), and I do have to work with people on occasion (mostly WFH), my other half is the same boat and so on. It's hard at the best of times to look beyond your immediate community too, I mean you could take the same argument and apply it to any life-saving care for example. To a certain extent I'm very much a fan of the UK working to improve the situation in countries with poorer care and to provide help and support to poorer countries generally, a 'levelling up' if you want to take the current Tory metaphor global. With a pandemic that's obviously on a completely different time scale and with very different risk profiles though, it's relatively easy and if it saves some lives, even by increasing my risk marginally then I'd be all for it too. \n\nEither way I'd like to see the UK produce and export as much vaccine to those who need it, wherever they are, Oxford (and Astrazeneca) have already done a lot for that, I'm happy to see that the UK worked globally via the various groups that were set up too, so its not all negative.", "110" ], [ "> There is greater incentive for hospitals to attribute any particular death to Covid, as they receive a greater amount of funding from the government.\n\nAre you seriously suggesting that hospitals are misattributing deaths to COVID for funding? If nothing else that doesn't really make sense given how NHS funding works, and secondly it'd be obvious in other stats (not least excess mortality). \n\n > However using comparisons to other epidemics, terror attacks and wars is the wrong way to go about making that point.\n\nThat's a much more reasonable point, and obviously when you start comparing it to other diseases its alarming (and very much up there...), but is somewhat more comparable.", "912" ], [ "> What killed them? Covid or the Stroke?\n\nThey died with covid, and it'd be recorded as such if they died within 28 days of having a test, that's pretty consistent. That said someone who had covid a month ago and then ended up having a stroke as a result of it (and the risk is significantly increased by covid) it wouldn't be a covid death. There is likely some over-counting, but the excess mortality stats would suggest that it's not distorting the impact of the pandemic.\n\n > If you were the manager of a hospital, I'm sure you'd be incentivised to put <PERSON> somewhere in the coronor's report. ESPECIALLY if you feel your hospital has for years received a lack of funding.\n\nI'm a tad confused, what role does a hospital manager have in issuing a death certificate and why would there be a coroner's report, especially if we are talking about a hospital death where the person who died was under the care of a doctor?\n\nAre you sure you aren't importing some of the bullshit from the US (where the above might make some sense..) and trying to apply it to the UK?\n\n > To think these decisions don't happen otherwise is just outright naive.\n\nExcept you seem to be somewhat confused about how hospitals are funded and how deaths are recorded.", "912" ], [ "> You're just plain wrong, Greater London had the highest % of remain votes in Britain. Of the 10 most heavily remain constituencies, all 7 that are English were in London.\n\nNo, I'm not wrong. Although you can tweak it by redefining what you mean by London, that said, assuming you are using the 59.9% remain figure for Greater London then that falls short of Manchester and is close to where Liverpool and York were. London is however bigger. It did have a lower remain share than Scotland though.\n\n > Manchester was more pro Leave than 19 (of 32) London boroughs. Only 4 boroughs voted leave, all boroughs that were added to Greater London recently and have more in common with the Home Counties than London proper, and all 4 border Home Counties.\n\nI'm sure we can find areas of Manchester that were more remain leaning than various London Boroughs if we had the breakdown data. Either way, London had a greater share of leave voters than Manchester, unless you (as you seem to want to do..) remove the bits of London that didn't vote Remain to the same degree.\n\n > Liverpool ranks even more pro leave than Manchester.\n\nIt does, 58.2% remain vs London at 59.9%, York was at 58%.\n\n > Edinburgh was less remain than 6 London boroughs, Glasgow was less remain than 14, Aberdeen was less remain than 18.\n\nBut considerably more remain leaning than London.. And again, I'm sure we can find parts of Edinburgh, Glasgow or Aberdeen that had higher rates of remain, especially given that they had an overall higher rate or remain voting than London.\n\n > Absolutely sick of northerners acting like London is the home of Tories or brexiteers when its actually the opposite.\n\nAnd I'm sick of Londoners making out that London doesn't have a massive number of leave support. 4 in 10 Londoners voted leave compared to a bit over 5 in 10 nationally after all. Leaving the EU belongs as much to those London leave voters as it does to those in the Midlands or the North.", "564" ], [ "> Everyone who dies gets a death / coronor's report. They don't just fling the body out the window.\n\nThey get a death certificate, issued by a GMC registered doctor. It goes to a coroner under certain conditions, but where a doctor knows what illness caused the patient's death and has seen the patient and treated them for that illness within the 14 days before they died then it doesn't go to the coronorer does it?\n\n > Hospitals haven't been receiving extra funding to tackle the pandemic? They haven't been looking at areas hit particularly hard by the pandemic and distributing funding accordingly? I'm confused more by your logic tbh lol\n\nYes, generally out of central government funding, dependant on need (including occupancy)... the allocation of funding has largely however been driven (as far as I am aware..) by testing, not deaths. The usual funding for treatment still applies too, it's not like there is any benefit, or profit to be made by anyone for treating a person for COVID when they don't have it after all.\n\nAgain, this sound suspiciously like the arguments that were made in the US because, you know, completely different health funding model, that makes little sense in a UK context.", "912" ], [ "> I’ve here used death certificate and coronor’s report interchangeably. But the point still stands - Hospitals will use whatever evidence they can to inflate the numbers one way or another in order to receive extra funding.\n\nIt doesn't stand at all, you claimed hospital management would inflate the numbers, they can't, they'd have to pressure doctors (who would lose their job and have pretty good professional organisations to prevent that). And then you appear to misunderstand the basis of the funding too.\n\n > No benefit / profit for treating? \n\nThey are NHS hospitals, they don't make a profit.\n\n > I don’t think they can base the need to allocate funding based on negative tests over positive tests and deaths. It’s about measuring BURDEN. You can also have many positive tests and be coping quite well nonetheless.\n\nIt's based on regional and local positive testing... That's carried out by DHSC and local authorities, not the hospitals and is used to gauge risk. And again, they are getting paid whether someone is in hospital for covid or not.\n\n > Leicester has a smaller population than London and would thus have fewer negatives / positives. Doesn’t mean they weren’t overwhelmed and didn’t require more funding than Charing Cross for example.\n\nObviously... But I'm not sure how that relates to anything else you've said here.", "237" ], [ "> You keep saying they’ll get paid irrespective of Covid cases but that’s the whole crux of the discussion. I’m saying if a hospital can show that they’re struggling to bare the burden, they’ll get more funding.\n\nRight, but the hospital doesn't need to fake causes of deaths to get that support and you'd need doctors to jeapordise their careers for your notion to be correct. In short, it doesn't really make any sense.\n\n > NHS hospitals may not overtly run for profit however if they feel like they’ve been operating on a shoe string budget for years, you bet the hospital management will want to receive as much help as they can get at a time where the government is essentially saying ‘here’s money for those who need it’.\n\nAnd they are getting that money, again, they don't need to fake causes of death, and if doctors were routinely faking death certificates to bring in funding it'd be pretty notable (and we'd be hearing about it).\n\nInstead this is practically a copy and paste (especially with all your references to coroners reports) to the US conspiracy theories around the pandemic actually not being that bad, and hospitals faking it for money.\n\n > DHSC and local authorities may do the formality of assessing the burden (I’ll take your word for it), but they’re only going to base their assessment on numbers purported by the hospital themselves.\n\nThey manage the testing.... The hospitals don't do the wider testing, the lock downs and everything else is based on the massive test operation ongoing, that is not run by the NHS or NHS hospitals.\n\n > The last point is to show how Burden of the pandemic can be quantified and this guide the distribution of funding. Greater funding in high burdened areas - > Inflation of numbers - > Headlines showing how the UK has failed to adequately cope with the pandemic\n\nWhich has what to do with faked causes of death?", "237" ], [ "> 4 in 10 Mancunians also voted Leave?\n\nA bit under yes..\n\n > And given London is the largest bastion of non-Tory voters in England, I'd say there is considerably less blame to be thrown at our feet vs yours or people from the Midlands, the North etc ad nauseam.\n\nI'm not casting blame, I voted leave. If you read up the thread, this started with the notion that s about the Southerners have more in common with Scots (apparently because they supported remain) when the south voted majority leave..\n\n > The reason why I split London by borough vs using the Scottish cities/Manchester as whole cities is because they're all dwarfed by London (as you mention yourself). Manchester (115km²) as a whole provided 121,823 remain votes. Wandsworth alone (13km²) provided 118,463 remain votes - more than the entirety of Liverpool.\n\nSure, but again it also provided vastly more leave votes too. There are very reaminy bits of London, but as you pointed out, there are less remaining bits, and outright leave supporting areas too. On balance it tips 60/40 in favour of remain.\n\n > Only 10 regions of Scotland yielded > 50k remain votes, vs 28 London boroughs. You might not want to because it reduces your argument to semantics, but a single London borough is comparable to the entirety of Scottish/Northern cities.\n\nAnd again, if you are looking at absolute numbers, London also provided massive numbers of leave votes, if half of those had gone to remain instead the UK would be staying in the EU. I'm not suggesting that large parts of London didn't have a lot of remain support, but I'm not going to ignore that there as a huge amount of leave support too.\n\n > The outer, newer boroughs did waver, but using them as a stick to beat the whole of London is ironic considering you're not adding Salford, Bolton, Bury, Stockport, Trafford, Wigan into what you're calling \"Manchester's\" brexit results\n\nI'm not beating anyone with anything, I'm pointing out that you are trying to selectively use bits of London to paint a skewed picture of London as a whole, if you wanted to point out hat X borough was massively remain supporting I'm not going to disagree with you, but if we are looking at Greater London then there was a majority to remain, but a lot of leave support. And again, in the context of the south, London pushed the remain number up significantly, but the south still largely voted to leave.\n\n > Why dont you average all those out and compare it to Greater London's results, and see what comes up?\n\nBecause it wouldn't be particularly relevant? Again, it sounds like you want to selectively ignore and include areas in a definition based on how they voted, obviously that skews any outcome to the point of being meaningless.", "852" ], [ "Freedom of movement is a treaty right, the UK couldn't have controlled it, EU nationals have a right to move between EU countries to live and work, the controls that people have suggested the UK could apply essentially involve removing the very, very small number of EU migrants who failed to meet the requirements that the EU sets in terms of FoM.\n\nThis notion that is doing the rounds that the UK could control EU migration under FoM is pretty absurd and completely undermines the whole basis of the EU (and the four freedoms..).", "631" ], [ "> it would be pretty naive to say it's not Brexit related. If the EU feels entitled to supplies made in other countries then why single out the UK? \n\nBecause the EU's issue is specifically with the AZ vaccine and the UK has production capacity and is receiving vaccines?\n\n > Oh right, because they know that Brexit made the UK public enemy number 1 in Europe, so it's the target that will get the most people to fall for this PR shitstorm they're deliberately generating.\n\nI'm not sure that Brexit made the UK public enemy number 1, and more to the point absent that it'd still face the same issues. It's not like the EU hasn't repeatedly scapegoated its own members in the past where it has hit issues (whether Greece being a fairly painful recent example, but hardly alone).", "374" ], [ "Just taking your quote, something governed by English law wouldn't really give the UK a role in this beyond being a venue for disputes, English law is really, really popular when you are talking about any sort of international trade or finance, so it's not surprising that it'd be very common for bonds to be governed by English law. The articles focus is on the UK's G7 role (which seems a lot more relevant..) and including private lenders in that framework.", "631" ], [ "> I don't know how it works in the UK. You need an actual breach of contract if you want to win in court because there was a breach of contract.\n\nIn Belgium, like the UK an anticipatory breach is a thing, if you know the person you have a contract with will breach it, you don't actually have to wait for them to breach it, or say that they will before taking action. Obviously under most circumstances it's quite hard to show that someone is going to breach their contract (although where you have hard and fast lead times and they overrun it's usually quite clear), but where you can that's helpful in that it allows you to mitigate the impact of someone intending to breach a contract.\n\n > If one of the party states that they're not going to fulfill their part of the deal that's a breach of contract itself.\n\nYep, it absolutely is, and if they outright state that they are not going to fulfill their contract obviously makes it far easier to show that breach (compared to say, where they are telling you they will meet their obligations, but you can show that they can't..).\n\nI suppose a better way to word is is that you don't need to wait until the terms of the contract have not been fulfilled before a breach has occured (a breach of a contract isn't just non-compliance with the terms or timetable), it being clear that they won't be fulfilled, or where one party has no intention to comply with the terms is enough.", "712" ], [ "Just as an aside, that's pretty much exactly what people were saying in 2004 about Labour and to a certain extent what some of the expectation was in the run up to the coalition government (the number of people I know that voted Lib Dem because they wanted to send Labour a message, but didn't want a Tory government is a bit insane..). Incumbents however definitely have an advantage, but where there is viable opposition changes are entirely possible.\n\nThe notion that people will vote Tory regardless is false, its just that most people are voting on the basis of the direct impact they've seen from government and some aspiration, not neccesarily what you might see as wider policy impact.", "365" ], [ "I'm not sure that you can really look at this and suggest that the reaction has been particularly unreasonable, and it's not like the UK government hasn't been getting (And continues to get..) a massive amount of stick for its handling of the pandemic. If anything it has been a little bit alarming at just how happy some people are to blithely accept what has come out of the EU and Germany specifically over the last week, with little thought to holding the EU institutions to account. \n\nThere is an assumption on the UK side that we will see an inquiry (whether people are confident it'll lead somewhere is a different issue..), on the EU side it seems that most of the calls have been to investigate AZ and exports, but no real questions about the timeline on the contracts or the oversight etc..\n\nLets not pretend that this is about a mass of parochial, petty, nationalist, little Englanders and paranoid Europhobes, quite a lot of the people raising questions and making comments on this have come from those who appear to have been pretty well disposed toward the EU after all. \n\nI can see that it has been a bit of a shock for some (with the brexit divide meaning that those on the remain side have generally sided, uncritically with the EU even where they EU was in the wrong or taking the piss, and the leave side uncritically supporting the UK where it fucked up) because it does present a glaring set of issues and seems to expose not only some failings (which you'd expect..), but also a shifting of blame and arguably an attack on things like confidence in vaccinations during a global health crisis.\n\nAt the end of the day, the outcome should be that the EU and UK get as much of the vaccines as they have ordered and out into their respective vaccination programmes, the aim is to save lives. Pissing about, and especially pissing about in public and undermining those efforts is pretty counterproductive.", "374" ], [ "The referendum was inevitable (82% of people said they wanted one...) and frankly leaving was inevitable too. The UK's aims in terms of the EU and the aims of most of the rest of the membership base don't align, hence the UK being on the periphery of the project and there being so little support for the political project (never mind the monetary union, defence and so on..). \n\nThe EU would continue to try to integrate, the UK would either have had to opt out of all of that becoming increasingly isolated within the EU building pressure to leave, or UK governments would have had to agree to a level of integration that people in the UK outright objected to. Remember that the demand for a referendum on treaty change was already a thing and that while the EU might not have been the top priority, it was a consideration.\n\nThe whole 'most important issue' thing being used as a 'people didn't care' argument is daft anyway, if you were voting in a GE at any point in the last few decades, your stance on the EU was effectively rendered pointless by the complete lack of choice. All the major parties were pro-remain and the only leave party was a bit mental (but still got votes in elections that people in the UK saw as being unimportant, including EP elections).", "564" ], [ "> I disagree. If you're going to do something irreversible that will have an immense impact on everyone's way of life then you better make damn sure people won't have buyers remorse once you go and do it.\n\nSomething being the status quo doesn't mean that it should be preferable, leaving the EU also isn't irreversible (although I doubt the UK will rejoin), it is however incredibly problematic to have a majority vote to leave a political union and then remain part of it, especially if it can legislate for the UK and cause the UK to legislate etc..\n\n > As it currently stands, we are a nation that would prefer to be in the EU (the polls have been consistent on this for a long period of time now) \n\nThe polling hasn't really moved very much and is pretty close to where the UK was before the referendum. At best you could argue that the instability and uncertainty worried people, but it's not as though there is a majority to rejoin the EU at this point either..\n\n > but have just left and will never be able to get back membership on the terms we've thrown away. That to me is far more illegitimate and frankly tragic.\n\nWe'll almost certainly not rejoin at all, because the view of the project isn't particularly positive. Most of the remain feeling was driven out of a fear of the economic impact of leaving, as that recedes I can't imagine even the current levels of support being sustained for very long.", "564" ], [ "> I totally agree, but the prism through which this is being reported is very different in the UK and EU. \n\nI'm reading the German reporting and the UK reporting, the UK reporting is certainly more focused on the risk to the UK's vaccination roll outs, but the tone seems pretty similar. It doesn't seem wildly different especially if you look at comparable discussions .\n\n > All the europhobe fanatics can barely contain their glee, \n\nAnd all the europhile nutters were in pretty much the same position, seeing this as some sort of mechanism to 'punish' the UK with a 'trade war' (or rather export controls) with a few accusations of 'theft' thrown in.\n\n > whilst the facts are probably not as clear as they think.\n\nThey probably aren't as clear as anyone thinks, but the implications are relatively clear, the EU's media push, and how that led into a variety of other European politicians making statements, has also provided some clarity.\n\n > Most of them can only cope with simple, binary scenarios, so it's to be expected. doesn't stop me calling them out for what they are.\n\nRight...\n\n > It's one thing to be a remainer who says that the EU was clearly tardy in its decision making, which is bound to have consequences. Even the most ardent remainer (like me) has never pretended the EU bureaucracy was good in an emergency. It's entirely another to be a remainer who says \"this has proved me wrong, and I'm happy with Brexit\".\n\nI'm not sure either is particularly unreasonable. If the remainder was one of those that thought (and there are a few..) that the EU always acts rationally, compassionately and doesn't engage in petty politics and push a narriative for a domestic political argument, you might look at what has come out of the EU and from European politicians over the last little while and consider some of the things that came out during brexit too. It undermines confidence after all. It's not unlike those people who decided to vote leave, despite liking the EU, largely because of what they saw as EU mistreatment of Greece during the debt crisis etc..\n\n > The probability at the end of all this is that despite a quicker roll-out of vaccines in the UK than the EU, we'll still end up with the worst casualty figures.\n\nI'm not sure how the casualty figures are relevant unless you are trying to turn this into an EU vs UK handling of the pandemic. In that context you have a fairly mixed picture after all, the UK did poorly initially in a number of areas (especially testing), but then did a pretty good job in ramping that up, on sequencing and on the vaccine (not just the roll out..). The UK also isn't exactly a massive outlier when compared to Spain, Italy and France, especially when what counts as a covid death does vary enough (see Belgium...) to make a difference.\n\nIn any case, no-one is suggesting that the UK has generally been a shining star in handling the pandemic, we know that deaths are higher than they could have been, the focus is on the EU's interaction with AZ and the UK and the issues around accountability.", "374" ], [ "**Sorry, your submission has been manually removed by a human!**\n\nYour submission does not meet the post requirements of this subreddit. This could be for example;\n\n- Source is contained as a link, but you've made a selfpost. Please link to the article/source directly as a 'link post' and make your comments as a comment reply. Keep the same title as the source.\n\nGiven the source isn't behind a paywall, I can't see any reason why you'd post it as a self post with the article text, other than to change the headline. I can see that the headline isn't massively clear, but I'd be happy for you to post it with say [The Good Law project] included at the beginning or the end to make it clear what and who the question relates to.\n\n*If you believe this message is posted in error, [message the /r/uk team](_URL_0_) and include a link to this post. Please don't do this lightly, we're very busy and have likely acted correctly.*", "156" ], [ "It's a bit of a weird one really the UK and EU have agreed not to reduce employment rights below the standards that existed on 31 December, but only somewhat narrowly (essentially where it impacts trade or investment). Obviously both can diverge from future employment law changes in the other territory, with (subject to certain constraints and an arbitration process) the potential to apply measures to rebalance any apparent imbalance that arises, although again only if there is proof of a material impact on trade or investment.\n\nThe EU 'having a word' is unlikely to be a thing though, if anything the EU hasn't really been a major barrier to downward trends in employment protections (UK protections generally exceeding the EU minimums and all that). The barriers to stripping workers rights in the UK have been, are and will continue to be political..\n\nOr maybe the EU jumped in and saved the UK's workers rights again (or at least is being handed the credit for it again...). People seriously forget that the rights we enjoy were fought for, come from hard work from the labour movement (and party...), they were not something gifted by the EU..", "631" ], [ "What evidence is there to the contrary? The Lib Dems supported a referendum because it was popular, the Tories did too, that pushed support for a referendum (among remain and leave supporters..) incredibly high. Support for the EU dropped significantly during the migration crisis and each previous EU crisis, the political project has objectively never been popular (the economic elements far more) and the UK is on the periphery. \n\nYou could make an argument that people were slowly coming round to the EU and that brexit might have pushed that, but its undermined by the reasons people gave for voting remain, indeed it is massively undermined by how few people felt that support for the EU as a project and its aims were relevant to their vote. It was largely around the potential economic impact. One of the more popular remain arguments early on was 'remain and reform' with the reform for many people apparently being 'change the EU into something else'. You still have remain supporters arguing that we could have left the EU while significantly restricting FoM too (which is false...). \n\nWe had years after the referendum where the remain campaign effectively continued to campaign for remain (via revoke and a second referendum), but two GE's where they were unable to crystalise that support and even at the end of all that, at the point where people thought the UK would leave with no-dea (and so the economic harm was seen as most immediate), support bounced around (albeit with remain generally ahead) with increasing numbers of 'don't knows'.\n\nThe notion that the UK had changed its mind was kicked off the day after the referendum (initially with a 'people had to google what the EU was'/they don't know what they voted for line) and has been arguably a continuous noise since. That has had an impact, but that impact is almost certainly going to fall away going forward and the support for the EU will go with it. Especially as people look at the EU from the outside with all the issues it has internally, rather than focusing on the potential economic loss from leaving (given we've left).", "564" ], [ "It may be the rather long, deep and pretty complex UK/US relationship, especially at operational levels is something they are aware of and so don't look at it from the perspective of the current political climate at any given point?\n\nThe UK and EU do have a close relationship, in many areas closer than the UK had with the US, that has generally supported US and UK interests (and Europes in many areas) to paint it as mercenary is to miss the point.", "437" ], [ "Broadly because of how the denial differs (and the motivation behind a lot of holocaust denial vs covid denial) and can vary - denial that covid exists vs denial of the impact/seriousness vs any number of other bits, and then the denial of a historical event vs the denial of scientific evidence. They are both obviosly bad, although you could argue that covid denial is currently more dangerous in the short term, holocaust denial more dangerous in the long term. \n\nThe 'stupid' bit is broadly the issue around using extreme examples to make a point, especially where the emotive nature of one side of an example is likely to distract. I mean you could go with something else extreme that is still denial of accepted science (say flat earth..) and you'd have a better comparison and not offer something for someone to divert to.", "569" ], [ "> Why go to the effort of learning everything like that, and passing the tests, and getting the proper licence, when you can just drive for Uber in your own car?\n\nOr drive any other type of minicab.\n\nThe benefit of black cabs is that they can pick up anywhere without a booking of course, and minicab drivers (including uber drivers..) still need a private hire license.", "114" ], [ "> It has been clear for some time that there's a majority in the house against no deal. \n\nIt has also been clear that there is no majority for any avenue that actually prevents a no-deal. It is not enough for Parliament to be 'against' no-deal, they have to be for a deal, or for revoke, or for something else, and if they are they should legislate for it (again, because it being clear that there is opposition to no deal is a tad tenuous unless you can point to something that actually shows it).\n\n > The truth is that before <PERSON> went, it was clear that she was determined to leave with a deal. It is clear now that <PERSON> is determined to leave without a deal. \"Why would when <PERSON> took power be particularly relevant?\" is disingenuous; you know perfectly well that MPs face different consequences for the country now.\n\nBut MP's knew that the UK would leave without a deal if they didn't act, the only difference now is that they didn't believe that <PERSON> would, and do believe that <PERSON> would. They've also known <PERSON> was going to step down and be replaced by a harder brexiteer for a long time.\n\nThis shouldn't be a surprise, it isn't some huge shift, and the issue remains the lack of action on the party of MP's and the unwillingness of MP's to take a stance.", "236" ], [ "> Some clearly hoped that a rational moderate would replace <PERSON>.\n\nThe issue is the legislation though, not the PM...\n\n > Yes it is, it's just not a shift that bothers you personally.\n\nIt's not a huge Shift, <PERSON> said essentially the same thing <PERSON> did, just no-one believed her, and again, the legislation is the same, nothing has changed in terms of the law, MP's can't ignore that they legislated for this and haven't been able to say anything other than 'we don't like it, but we don't want to do anything to stop it..'\n\n > It's just that you can't deduce \"we should leave without a deal\" from \"parliament is divided about what to do to avoid leaving without a deal\".\n\nBut Parliament legislated to leave with or without a deal, and hasn't been able to find a majority to change the legislation. \n\nYou wouldn't deduce \"we should not eat this evening\" from \"we disagree about which restaurant is best\".\n\nNo, of course not, but again, MP's legislated to take the UK out of the EU, have had months to change that and haven't (because a significant portion don't want to be seen as anti-leave). They have had several avenues to shift the default or make it clear that no-deal cannot happen, they haven't. And even now, the majorities we are talking about potentially existing against no deals are in single digits.", "236" ], [ "It's based on [Birth Control by <PERSON>_) and you can absolutely hear broadly the same melody and there are bits lifted directly, but then it's Ska so much of it is either based on existing reggae/ska themes or emulates them. A lot of the mellow end of the sound is pretty much there in the 60's anyway. The add from The Specials is the punky/angry element if anything, which is definitely a product of the times.", "665" ], [ "It did, it then went through the negotiation process and came to an agreement with the EU. There is after all, fairly broad agreement between the UK and EU on a huge slew of issues. The problem was that deal hitting Parliament, where it was promptly opposed by both Government rebels (pushing for a no-deal exit) and the Opposition (on a mixed basis, including that any kind of exit should be opposed).\n\nThe issue here isn't that the UK government and EU couldn't find an agreement, its that Parliament doesn't (or didn't) or potentially can't provide a majority for any kind of deal because it is split into three factions, those that don't want to leave at all (and so oppose any deal) those who want to leave with no-deal (and oppose a deal for obvious reasons), leaving a minority in support of any WA.\n\nDifferent negotiation positions, different policy aims and different red lines would simply shift those groupings somewhat without really solving anything, unless MP's start to compromise (something that arguably the threat of not-leaving and the threat of no-deal might have provided).", "564" ], [ "MP's took their Easter break before the first deadline, they took their summer recess too. The legislation to force an extension is in, so that isn't an issue... The problem is that MP's don't seem to want to find an actual workable way forward, they want to avoid having to do so and be held accountable. I mean come on, the last month has been all about 'avoiding' a no-deal but only by demanding an extension. \n\nThis prorogation was intended to be used as a political tool, to run down the clock and apply pressure, but frankly even that has failed at this point given that we have both anti-no-deal legislation in and opposition to an election.", "236" ], [ "The issue here being that the tariffs on steel would have caused more issues for UK industry. The UK has a demand for cheap imported steel (and exports parts and finished goods made from that steel, as well as being involved in advanced metallurgy) so closing off cheaper imports hits UK manufacturers and exports by increasing the cost of raw materials. The UK can't (and hasn't been able to for a long time..) compete with Chinese production (nor can EU producers..) and it can't compete with subsidised EU production (because the UK didn't prioritise or protect its steel industry in the 70's in the way that some EU members did). \n\nIn that context, the issue here really is that the UK's requirements don't match the overall EU requirements and so what is best for the EU as a whole wasn't good for the UK.", "631" ], [ "That's a really odd stat, I want the UK out of the EU, but if it isn't done fully within the law, it lacks legitimacy. \n\nRight now that is the case, there is legislation in place that takes the UK out of the EU, there is also legislation that requires an extension to be asked for if no agreement is in place (or where Parliament doesn't consent), there is no getting around either so while ideally a deal should be put in place, an extension should be sought (and in good faith) if that is not possible. If the law is ignored it legitimises everything else that has come so far.\n\nIf people want to hold their MP's to account for not doing what they want or feel is right then a General Election (early or otherwise) is the point where we can do so. In the interim we can apply pressure via the normal democratic process and public debate. Suggesting that we ignore the law goes against that and there is, at least at this point nothing close to a justification for it.", "236" ], [ "> I completely agree with everything you said, but you're missing my point, which is the Government, under <PERSON>, tried to, like <PERSON>, completely bypass Parliament. Brexit was always going to be a legislative process. It was stupid to ignore the legislative branch. She should have built a consensus before going to the negotiations.\n\nNeither has tried to bypass Parliament (<PERSON> comes close with this prorogation, but realistically given the timings even that isn't really true). Both have tried to work with what they saw as the largest groupings likely to lead to an outcome, in the absence of a majority for a specific brexit outcome within their own parties.\n\nThere was no way to build a consensus along the normal lines, so it could only ever be about finding a compromise position, a compromise position that in turn could only be pushed in contrast to the extremes.\n\nThrow in that the issues around A50 being triggered also being a precondition to start negotiation with the EU and you end up with a mess, you have three (really four or more..) finely balanced blocks on one side, and the EU on the other and you have a mess.\n\nAnd again, you can't ignore that the referendum (while non-binding) brought about enough political pressure for MP's to pass the Withdrawal Act, there was consensus to move forward. The Government managed to find a route to an EU withdrawal agreement what they felt their Parliamentary support could vote for in support of those on the opposition benches that supported a deal too. That was the miscalculation. You suddenly had both no-dealers and hard-remainers opposing it and so no way to pull support from the middle. Essentially we ended up with polarisation.\n\nThere is no point before triggering A50 that a consensus that also worked in terms of the EU's position could have been found (or rather, it would be seen as 'cakeism'), the only approach that would be likely to work is to put together a broadly reasonable deal (and the WA isn't far off that) as a starting point and push support for it in the face of no-deal or no-brexit, especially in the face of a ticking clock. Unfortunately it seems that the ticking clock sort of stopped and MP's seem to feel that they can get away with not making a decision as long as the UK remains in Limbo.", "236" ], [ "That doesn't solve the issue that there is no consent to remain in the EU. You might be able to get a plurality of people to get behind remain in that context, but if most of the country doesn't want to be in the EU (albeit for different reasons) you don't actually solve the core problem.\n\nNow, you could have a 'leave vs remain' referendum (well, we have..) and then a referendum on which leave option people prefer, but that is supposed to be Parliaments job. You can't however end up in a position where a majority of people want to leave the EU but we remain because they have different ideas about how we should leave.", "564" ], [ "Absolutely, and it's sort of what you'd expect when a given forum is largely uniform in terms of outlook, dissenting positions as well as problematic ones are generally downvoted below the threshold for visibility and so engagement becomes either impossible or pointless. It's effectively what you see in any 'bubble'. I'm not sure it's particularly healthy but it's both understandable and almost impossible to avoid.\n\nIt also leads to shit tier posting, as you pointed out you just 'troll them and have a bit of fun on their expense', which tends to mean that the majority of posters from the 'other side' tend to be trolling too.", "263" ], [ "Sure, and that'd work at this point (As we know roughly what options are available) but there is a reluctance in Parliament to push that forward for a number of reasons, not least questions about what should be on the ballot, issues about having no-deal as an option, issues around how binding such a vote would be, especially in the face of MP's already saying they'd ignore certain outcomes, and so on.\n\nFundamentally though, we shouldn't even *need* a second referendum on how to leave, that is quite litereally what Parliament is supposed to do, and a referendum as you are proposing, with various leave options, would be a direct policy question rather than one of direction (and I'd argue, many would disagree, that referendums are best about a binary choice of direction rather than a specific policy implementation, and even then only where there is no easy way to solve the issue via the normal political process as was arguably true with brexit and to a lesser extent AV).", "564" ], [ "> Realistically we voted for \"Thingy\", but nobody could agree on what \"Thingy\" meant. That's not a direction - that's meaningless.\n\nNo, we voted to leave the EU, everyone knows what 'not being in the EU' means, the problem is that there are several different ways you can leave the EU, and several different ways the UK could interact with the EU afterwards. The only really clear thing is that 'remaining in the EU' is not 'leaving the EU'.\n\n > I'm as uneasy about direct democracy on policy decisions as you, but realistically it's the only way to get a democratic mandate for any particular course forwards from here.\n\nBut again, our representatives would have to set that up (and for it to be meaningful, set it up in a binding manner). That has a slew of problems, and will cause issues with legitimacy. I doubt that the remain camp would concede to a referendum on 'how to leave' and I doubt that the leave camp would be happy with a remain vs several leave options referendum. I'd throw in that I'd be uneasy with a no-deal option directly, but I couldn't justify it not being there either. If you run some sort of preference vote, you then have legitimacy issues regardless of how it goes and a problem if there is either less participation or an ambiguous result.\n\n > It's easy to say \"it's up to government to decide on a specific course of action\", but if they'd decided on a soft \"Brexit-in-name-only\" where we gave up our vetos/votes but were still bound by the CJEU and regulatory conformity to the EU then hard Brexiteers would have been rioting in the streets.\n\nBut that is quite literally their job. And if they chose a very soft brexit then sure, hard leavers would be upset by that but given anything the UK does is going to be, by definition, a compromise, there are going to be a slew of people who would have preferred a slightly different outcome.\n\n > Likewise now, just because <PERSON> incompetent shower of fuckwits ran down the clock and now <PERSON> is sprinting for a no-deal Brexit, I don't think you can justify that with \"we voted Leave with no agreement on how or when - in fact in the face of stark, emphatic promises from all concerned that it wouldn't involve no deal - so therefore any method of Leavingt is acceptable\".\n\nAnd I'd agree that no-deal would be the worst way to leave, but it is at least on the 'leave' side of the outcome. Ideally I'd expect MP's to work together to avoid that and put in place an agreement and a framework that is flexible enough to shift as we move forward. We did vote to leave, that makes remaining in the EU incredibly problematic from the perspective of consent (the EU governs for us and causes the UK to legislate after all).. A referendum likely wouldn't clear that up (I doubt it'd go to anything other than a majority for leaving in some manner...) and would still leave us in the hands of MP's who would have to facilitate the outcome.\n\n > Just because we voted for a hand-job over full sex, that doesn't mean we should still be bound to that when they pull out the sandpaper gloves - that's just bait-and-switch.\n\nDaft analogies are daft, just because we can't decide whether to put a fire out with a hose or a fire extinguisher doesn't mean we should let the building burn down...\n\nThe point being that if you see leaving the EU as in the UK's long term interests, then yes, leaving with no-deal might be the least attractive way to do it, and indicate a massive failure of Parliament, but it is preferable to remaining. Doubly so given that the shower of shit that this process has been so far would likely make it incredibly hard, regardless of popular opinion, for governments to be pushed to offer a choice again, leading either to the UK forever in, but on the periphery of the EU with all the risk that entails, or some GE in the near future leading to a BXP (or similar..) government that takes us out of the EU and also fucks us domestically.", "564" ], [ "> We all know the time beforehand was wasted by the Tories, but that's not something that can be helped.\n\nMP's have had a huge amount of time to sort out the issues here, this isn't a 'the Tories wasted time' thing, this is a 'MP's legislated and are having a hard time putting together a majority to stop that legislation coming into force'. The problem is that MP's have steadfastly refused to either change the default from no-deal, and avoided doing anything to actually avoid a no-deal.", "236" ], [ "> Again, how are any rights beeing violated if it's all voluntary?\n\nAnd again, because we have legislation that grants and mandates certain elements when it comes to employment. I can't volunteer to work on a basis that breaks the law and employers can't coerce employees to agree to do so either. It's the same with a slew of rights, you can't give them up as breaching them is unlawful whether you are happy with the notion or not. It tends to protect society generally and prevent a race to the bottom in working conditions.\n\n > If all these \"rights\" do is get in the way of the workers then they aren't actualy rights, just government controling their lives\n\nAll rights get in the way of people doing things that they want as they tend to prevent someone from doing something 'to' you one way or another. And all rights essentially amount to the things that people have collectively (via government and legislation) decided are rights.\n\n > Then it's a bad thing. A company whent down for no reason\n\nIt'd be a bad thing for the company, arguably a good thing for the employees and society in general. After all, it will be the taxpayer who picks up the bill for injuries, harm, low pay, and so on. Essentially what you are asking for is state subsidy for a firm to allow it to continue breaking the law..\n\n > Irrelevant, if they agreed to it then it's because it's profitable for them and you are doing them a disservice by stopping them\n\nIt's relevant because they can't agree to terms that are not lawful. There are any number of jobs that would be more profitable if people could disclaim things like safety rules (think truck drivers, or even radiography or ATC), we limit time working for some roles, we don't allow people to work for less than statutory minimums when it comes to income, firms could pay staff more if they failed to comply with pension laws.\n\nBut that isn't how any society works. Uber isn't in compliance with the law, if it can't comply with the law and be profitable that's tough shit for uber, all of its competitors have to comply with the law after all.\n\n > And again, if all the law does is get in the way of the workers shouldn't we just get rid of it?\n\nNo, because it also protects workers and society more generally. \n\n > You keep arguing about the law, but the law should be changed to fit what makes sense, not the other way around. If we have no reason to do something outside of \"the law demands it\" then we should just get rid of that law\n\nSure, but in this case the law protects workers, employers and tax payers, so it's probably better we keep it and ensure that companies like uber adhere to the law rather than taking the piss in a manner that both exploits workers and creates unfair market conditions.", "334" ], [ "The argument would presumably be that her racism created an issue in terms of staffing at the hospital, created an unpleasant working environment for someone who didn't have much choice but to be there, and added cost to everyone else. It's a minor harm, but even ignoring the wider social context, it still creates problems. \n\nAdditionally, paying for something (via taxes or otherwise) doesn't generally entitle people to anything more than the services offered and within the bounds that they are provided. It doesn't mean you get to be a dick to someone and they have to accommodate whatever you want anyway.", "36" ], [ "> All you keep doing is bringing up the law\n\nWell yes, the law, and the reasons behind having the legislation in place. It would seem pretty reasonable to ensure that all those involved in the economy play by the same rules in that context and that the rules make sense. They do, and where people think they don't there is an entire independent judiciary that can look at it too.\n\n > If the law goes against the wishes of the workers, why keep it?\n\nIt doesn't go against the wishes of workers generally, this case was brought by a set of uber workers and their union, and most workers (and voters in general) seem to think that legislation that protects them is a good thing, not a bad thing.\n\n > You fail to present a single reason why these kind of laws are necessary. Only vague \"protects\" without actualy explaining why do people need to be protected against their own choices\n\nThey protect workers against making choices that society deems harmful. They protect society from having to bear the costs of those harmful choices.\n\nI mean if you want to take some sort of libertarian approach to employment legislation and the economy in general, then all you'd need to do is convince enough people of that.. Unfortunately people tend to prefer safe working conditions and having a social safety net, and that requires employers to play by (the same..) rules. \n\nIf uber can't do that and be profitable, then its better for everyone that it doesn't offer services in the UK, those companies that can and do will take up the slack.", "334" ], [ "I speak decent, fairly unaccented German fluently (lived and worked in Germany for years..) and it's always interesting when I'm in Germany after I haven't been for a while. Obviously if you don't use a language regularly you get a little rusty, you tend to have to search for some words and sometimes just trip over yourself. \n\nThe reactions vary from the comical (people who think you are slow, or have some sort of mental health issue, because instead of saying 'Tankstelle', you say 'Das ding... wo man ein Auto mit... Benzin... auffüllen kann'), to the shitty (people who think you are taking the piss out of them, or similar). Seriously had a women at Dusseldorf Airport outright have a go at me when I was picking up a rental car because I blanked on 'key/Schlüssel'... \n\nSo mostly for the first couple of days I tend to exaggerate an English accent and drop in English words to show that no, I'm not an idiot, or taking the piss, I'm just a Brit doing my best. amazingly it almost always results in an English reply rather than a German one (which is arguably unhelpful, but unless you mention it people aren't going to know). \n\nOddly I have exactly the opposite reaction in France (My french isn't quite as good as my German so maybe that's the difference) in that almost no-one switches to English and if anything people go out of their way to pick at your language or not quite understand even when I'm reasonably sure it's not unreasonable.", "930" ], [ "> If it didn't, there would be no reason to even implement it, for the workers just wouldn't do it anyway, without the need to use the law to stop them\n\nSo your argument is that we don't need any employment law, because individual workers would simply manage that? I'd assume you'd be happy with widespread unionisation then and no regulation of those unions given that'd be the only reasonable way to balance the power differential between workers and employees? \n\nAgain, there are a vast slew of rights that you can't voluntarily give up, that protects workers and society from costs and harm. Hence the legislation. If uber doesn't want to comply with that they probably shouldn't set up in this way, in a country where those rules are in place.\n\n > That's entierly unecessary. Didn't you agree we don't need to force people to do what's good for themselves?\n\nIt's not un-necessary though is it? We have a court case here where apparently a set of workers felt that they were entitled to their rights under the law, and the firm failed to deliver. The result almost certainly led to costs for the state too, and so an indirect subsidy for uber.\n\n > You keep repeating that it's \"better for everyone\" but don't point out any way in wich alowing people to do as they please is harmfull, both in specific and general\n\nI've repeatedly pointed out that there are societal costs (in work benefits, housing benefits, tax costs, pension poverty etc..) where employment laws are not followed, those costs fall on society as a whole, neither a subset of individual workers nor any single company should be in a position to create that sort of generalised cost. Hence society creating a situation where governments end up legislating.\n\nIf most workers want that to change, they can create that change by lobbying government after all, we live in democracies, we can create change. The issue would seem to be that there is broad popular support for those protections (if anything, support to expand them).", "334" ], [ "> Exactly. The only problem I have with unions is that most of them only ask for government intervention instead of just negociating. But in theory they are completely fine, even if I don't see their value\n\nThey tend to do both, and surely that's their role (they act collectively and lobby government and employers). Companies do the same after all. And how don't you see their value? Companies are people pooling capital to achieve an aim (and profit) unions are people pooling labour resources to achieve an aim (and increase income etc). \n\n > Such as...?\n\nYou can't abrogate your right to life for one (if someone gives you consent to kill them, you are still criminally liable for their death), but broadly you can't give up any of your statutory rights voluntarily. It's a breach of the law for someone to violate them.\n\n > This is what I keep complaining about. You keep saying they protect people, but never explain how\n\nI've explained several times..\n\n > Also, don't you think it's disingenuous to call that a \"right\" when it's just infringing upon the liberty of people? A right is a right to do stuff, beeing forced to do something you don't want isn't a \"right\", it's beeing coerced\n\nRights generally mean you have a legal claim or a legal protection... They can allow you to do something, or not allow others to do something to you.. And things like the right to a fair trial mean that you are entitled to a process which requires other people to do stuff, pay for stuff and so on. It's hardly coercion. It's society.\n\nRights are social constructs, they exist as far as society is able to determine and protect them Hence the court coming to the decision it did in this case.\n\n > Then the workers can just leave. If the Deal offered is not to their liking that's what they should do. They still have no right to coerce others into doing what they want\n\nThe company has no right to act unlawfully either though, and that's what it is doing. Surely you'd agree that employees and anyone else for that matter should be entitled to make use of the courts to ensure that the law is being followed, especially where they are losing out.\n\n > What? How? That dosen't even make sense\n\nThe state provides support for individuals when they don't have pensions, sensible incomes, or other issues that arise because their employment is precarious...\n\n > No, you claimed there are but fails to explain how does the ineraction between two consenting adults somehow affects people unrelated to the transaction\n\nBecause their interaction doesn't happen in a vacuum? If an employer incorrectly categorises an employee and so doesn't pay national insurance contributions, that creates a burden on the state, if they don't pay into a pension that creates a burden for the state, if they fire the employee and don't provide redundancy that creates a burden for the state, if they pay them less than the minimum wage, or mess with working ours to achieve that, that creates a burden to the state. \n\nThe UK has a social safety net, people see benefit payments, tax credits, unemployment benefits, health provision, pensions, housing benefit and so on. Those are all costs to the state. Where an employer fails to follow the law and so an employee ends up more reliant on the state (even if they are happy with that..) then the employer is essentially being subsidised by the state.\n\n > Or they can just do weatherver they want as a free individual. \n\nNo, they can't, because they are an individual that lives in a society with rules and collective decision making.\n\n > There is no need to involve government, and doing so will only lead to people beeing coerced\n\nExcept that government is already involved and that seems to have the support of most people, and again, as a society, people get to make choices together about how they are governed.\n\n > You keep making overly long replyes that deviate a lot from the discussion. You need to learn how to write more consisely\n\nAnd I'm free to do so, and if you are having issues reading the replies, that's your problem!", "334" ], [ "> If you aren't gonna explain your points why do you even write?\n\nI have explained my points.\n\n > You are yet to give reason why we should:\n > \n > 1 Impose those \"rights\" on people\n\nBecause we are a society and collectively define rights.\n\n > 2 Not change the law so that it alows people to do what's best for themselves\n\nBecause there doesn't seem to be a mandate to do so.\n\n > Your only argument was \"government forces them to take part in certain programs that they don't want to, if we alow them to do what they want the government won't be able to take money from them\"\n\nNo, my argument was that as a society we are at a point where government provides a safety-net and so we have rules that ensure fair play and ensure that people are equally protected.\n\n > You didn't give us a reason why doing this is a net positive, why is it moral, or anything. You just said \"because that's the way we do stuff and that's what we decided to do\"\n\nBecause that is the way 'we do stuff' and as a democracy, it would seem to have the support of the country.\n\n > Yes, but why is it a good idea to do this specific thing? Why shoiiwe just let people free to do as they please with their own lives?\n\nIt is a good thing because it protects individuals from abuse, in a relationship where they are usually the weaker party and because it reduces the wider cost to society. The cost to the individual is smaller than the benefits to the individual and to society as a whole.\n\nI get your point, you think that people should be able to enter into whatever agreements they want with others and that government and the law shouldn't intervene (possibly not even to the point of enforcement? Its not clear).\n\nWhat I'm saying is that while that's an entirely valid view, you don't get to impose it on others. Given people are and have shaped society, do have a say in governance and can make choices in that context, and apparently rejected your position in favour of one where we have employment laws and see collective and individual benefits, that would seem to be something for you to change at a society level.\n\nOf course that'd be a problem for uber. After all uber relies on that same society. The roads it drives on, the mobile phone networks it uses, the internet, the payment processors, the fuel in its cars, the ability to use the courts and so on are also products of that same society. The employment laws are part and parcel of what makes uber a viable business, they don't get to undercut them and the courts have just said exactly that.\n\nIf you want to change that, all power to you, but it'll be a pretty hard sell. And at the moment at least, we live in societies governed by law, and those laws are made by people we elect..", "651" ], [ "> Obviously, I'm not proposing we overtrow government. But if we have no reason to have certain laws why shouldn't we just vote them out?\n\nMy point would be that you should be proposing to overthrow the government, or more accurately, if you want this sort of policy approach, you'd need to influence government and push that view, probably by convincing others that it's the right approach.\n\nThat'll be a hard sell because most workers rights were pretty hard fought and workers tend to think they are a good thing. That isn't to say that there isn't a place for flexible working and self-employment, but there are rules around how that should work to prevent abuse and ensure there is a level playing field.\n\n > You don't give any reason for these specific rules to be in place. Just say \"we do it because we have the right to do it\"\n\nAgain, I've given you the reasoning behind them. Essentially that individuals face a restriction in choice to support the protections they have. If we apply it to something else it might be clearer - you don't have a choice to buy a car that doesn't meet UK standards, because the car might be dangerous, you don't get to make that choice as it endangers you and potentially other people. The same applies here, but with a different set of dangers (but still societal harm).\n\n > I already explained how it's negative to restrict people of their freedoms (not that I should need to). Why should we keep doing what's bad?\n\nBecause not doing so harms other people, and society in general.\n\n > And you fail to justify keeping that in place\n\nKeeping what in place? The social safety net? The justification for that is that it has popular support and prevents broad negative outcomes for people who are at risk. It's arguably an ideological choice, but one that can be justified by basically resulting in a society that is fairer for most and less likely to result in people being destitute.. \n\n > Once again, there is no need for that. People will only accept a deal if it's profitable to them, as I already explained several times\n\nAnd that is false, the reason we have labour unions, and employment protections is because employer/employee relationships are not equal, there are imbalances and employees are often at the mercy of employers. \n\n > Another baseless claim you don't even bother to explain. You need to be more clear what you mean\n\nAgain, we live in a society, we balance collective and individual need. You can't own a handgun because it is a danger to other people and provides very little benefit. Now I love shooting handguns, but if I want to change that I need to convince everyone else that the benefit of me being able to shoot handguns is worth the cost of that likely leading to increased gun related fatalities and gun crime generally..\n\nIn short, society involve a lot of balancing, this is one of them, it seems to work pretty well, it seems to be popular. If it weren't, it'd change.", "651" ], [ "> I don't accept that. It doesn't reflect reality. Voters and people are easily manipulated.\n\nSo no democracy at all then? Or something vastly more limited? The issues around the EU not being part of the national discussion and so a festering opposition to it with no outlet are pretty well understood now after all. People have a right so decide how they are governed, we do that via elections and referendums whether or not people agree with the outcomes.\n\n > No, because I still have to live here. But I won't give politicians more of my support by voting in their broken system.\n\nBut others will, I mean its your choice, but it's not as though that'll even make a statement, never mind have an impact.\n\n > Sure, if by works you mean votes were cast and an outcome delivered.\n\nYes.\n\n > I see it differently. I felt like my eyes were opened to just how badly broken it all is and how easy it is to lie and get away with. You simply just add more lies, and point at foreigners, or boat people, or poor people. Works every time.\n\n80%+ of voters had made up their mind on how they'd vote before the campaigns.. You make it sound like voters largely voted based on the output of the two campaigns, they pretty much didn't..\n\n > Not something I want to continue to participate in.\n\nLike I said, that's fair enough, I'm not sure how it helps or hinders. I suppose it'll save you 10 munutes every once in a while.", "845" ], [ "> You explain that people want to keep the laws, but don't explain why they are needed outside of vague claims they \"protect\" people and would \"endanger\" others, without explaining how that would actualy happen\n\nI've explained both, if you seriously don't understand the concept of balancing individual need vs societal need (which is pretty core to all of this) then I really can't help you. \n\n > This is a great example of what I'm talking about. What dangers? A properly handed weapon causes no damage to anyone (just like a car) so you aren't causing anything to anyone else just by owning one\n\nAnd ye more handguns in a society generally lead to more gun deaths and gun crimes.\n\n > So it makes no sense stopping you from doing so. You have the right to do as you please and it's up to you to decide if the benefits outweight the costs\n\nNo, you don't have the right to do as you please and the benefits and cost don't only apply to you, Society as a whole, so 'we' collectively get to have a say.\n\n > It's the same thing with jobs. You only affect those that decide to voluntary ineract with you.\n\nNope your choices have an impact on others.\n\n > The only exeption is if government forced itself into the transaction, in wich case all taxpayers were forced as well, hence why It m shouldn't happen in the first place\n\nExcept it should, it creates a society that functions.\n\n > You also once again argue we need a level playing field, when the only reason we don't is because of government interfirence in the first place, as I already pointed out\n\n > This is going nowere like this\n\nNo, it's not.", "651" ], [ "**48% of Britons will refuse to accept blue vaccination passports.**\n\nIn an apparent blow to the governments vaccination roll out, 48% of Brits have said that they will refuse to get a vaccination due to the colour of the documents. While they really really don't care about the colour of their vaccine passports, they won't have a blue one and will keep hold of their old yellow fever certificates instead.\n\nAccording to polling for the Independent while 52% of people said that they would prefer some shade of blue, there was a significant split between 'dark blue' and 'black blue' and so the only real mandate was for burgundy.\n\n<PERSON> from Bristol commented that a blue vaccination passports, manufactured in Bristol by a Scottish company \"epitomises the absurdity of the UK’s approach to vaccination and serves as unwelcome reminder that the UK is probably worst country in the word\".\n\nWhen asked about the 'worst' she said \"I mean we aren't even really vaccinating people, France are ahead if you only count people who have been fully vaccinated, by a European vaccine, the UK's vaccines don't really work and are probably racist\".\n\n\"Hopefully other countries don't recognise this one because of its blue colour, not that it matters because we can't go abroad anyway because people laugh at us and the pound isn't worth anything\" She said speaking at a regional vaccination centre after having had her first jab.\n\nThe Campaign for Burgundy Vaccine Passports said it would protest vaccination centers and provide burgundy covers for those traumatised by the colour blue. TCBVP said it would lobby the EU to have them grant the victims or blue vaccination passports the blue EU version instead.\n\nHowever, the EU scheme is unlikely to come into place for another few months at least as the European Commission's order of burgundy vaccination passports includes a contractual obligation for the production facility to be moved between Brussels and Strasbourg on a six monthly basis and the documents will be delivered on a best effort basis.", "929" ], [ "> Because there is no such a thing. The society is composed of individuals, by alowing these individuals freedom to do what they want you are already helping society\n\nExcept that's how our societies are structured, and how we continue to structure them, we limit individual freedom through rules for the benefit of society as a whole and to provide collective benefits (From roads, education, healthcare, policing and defence, through to social programmes). \n\n > Objectively false. There is no correlation, between violence and accessibility of fierarms. Wich makes Sense, because criminals don't Care about the law anyway\n\nExcept you know, there is. The UK sees vastly fewer firearm deaths because it has vastly fewer handguns, the UK's firearm deaths dropped after various measures were taken to limit access to guns. Criminals are vastly less likely to use guns in the commission of a crime.\n\n > You fail to explain how anyone outside of those to voluntarly enter a transaction are affected by it\n\nNo, I've explained it several times.", "701" ], [ "> As I already explained several times, that's not an argument\n\nAnd I've explained several times that societies are apparently how people want to live and they have a choice in how they live. Whether you want to or not, or whether you think that's valid or not is not really relevant. I also explained that there are lots of benefits to people living together as societies (Which is presumably why we have done for so long) including self-governance, infrastructure and basically being able to do lots of things that individuals can't in isolation.\n\n > Perfect examples. If people wanted this things, they would just buy it themselves. At best you gain nothing by restricting their freedom (as they would do that even if not forced) and at worse you are wasting a lot of money\n\nAnd again, if that's what people wanted to do they could, as it is we seem to have formed societies where people decide what they can and will do collectively. \n\n > Correlation =\\= causation. Gun crime was already dropping before and was unefected. Total violence was also unafected. \n\nNope total violence has fallen pretty consistently.\n\n > Same thing with Brazil, who restricted guns but violence doubled over the years, as it was already rising before and kept rising after\n\nThat's nice, but not relevant.\n\nAnd in either case, it reduced gun deaths in the UK.\n\n > No you didn't. Your only example was through government intervention, meaning without it there would be no interfirence\n\nI'm going to leave it at this point, but basically your issue is that you don't like a group of people coming together to act in a given way if individuals can't somehow opt out of that. That's a fair point, but at the end of the day, absent societal structures and laws, people would simply be forced to comply with a majority anyway, who would protect an individual rights at that point?", "651" ], [ "Sure, but I think it's also important to realise that the 'both weak and strong' thing isn't a poor argument in and of itself and often creates a really good indication of failed policy or problematic institutional set ups. They aren't 'bad' arguments. If anything a lot of the suggestions that a given policy is clearly a step on the road to fascism or communism are far more problematic as they tend to take people away from the issue being discussed and instead try to badge it as 'bad' by applying a given label.\n\nThere was for example a period just after 9/11 where all sorts of things started being labelled as terrorism (as in government policy, policing, articles, opinions, etc..), because people were using 'terrorism' as a synonym for pretty much anything that created fear, involved violence or could lead to oppression. But mostly it was used to tar whoever was engaged in the argument with a label that most people understood as 'really bad'.\n\nI mean by any sane reasoning the Tories aren't fascists, or heading toward fascism, much as Labour isn't (and also isn't heading toward authoritarianism communism, and wasn't under <PERSON>) . And yet you have a lot of people that will ascribe pretty much any policy suggestion as being part and parcel of a fall into fascism/communism..", "112" ], [ "> I also dont think Labour are communist, the communist party are for that, but especially not under <PERSON> who is taking after <PERSON> and <PERSON> with the \"new labour\" tactic.\n\nNo of course not, but the point is that people make that comparison around Labour in the same way that their opponents (usually on the fringes) do to the Tories. It's like calling the Greens eco-fascists I suppose.\n\n > Just for context, I am a socialist, not the SocDem kind though\n\nAnd I'm a Labour member and tend toward socialism although the evolutionary kind and tend to get interested in the issues balancing individual liberty and collective action.", "285" ], [ "Report it and let the police make a determination, but be aware that the above could be a factor in them not taking any further action. You'd have been doing your bit (reporting a dangerous pass), you aren't responsible for what the police does or doesn't do and you can take into account what u/cyclegaz has said going forward. \n\nAs an aside, I've started reporting close passes from my car dashcam as well as on the bike, it's not massive issue on my part and it does seem that the police are not beyond simply talking to drivers where the threshold for further action isn't met.", "990" ], [ "Not really. Anything that was ever brought into this country from somewhere else, even raw materials (which affects nearly everything), will be impacted by that. \n\nDepends on when they were purchased, but sure, it also depends on what the price of those items did at the same time, and what proportion the cost of raw materials has on the product price. Again, we didn't see any significant uptick in inflation, it remained at historic lows. People didn't get poorer, and certainly not 15-25% poorer.\n.\n > We may pay GBP for our morning coffee, but the coffee from Brazil/Colombia/Indonesia was purchased in USD.\n\nSure..\n\n > Much of the packaging was likely purchased in USD. \n\nAlmost certainly not.\n\n > A good amount of the input costs for power generation to run the lights in the store or run the coffee roaster were originally in USD.\n\nPossibly, although that rather depends.\n\n > Exchange rates are embedded in just about every product in this country, so yes, it does make a difference.\n\nSo how do you explain the difference between the change in the value of the pound and the prices consumers and businesses paid over the same period?", "73" ], [ "Oh come on, not only is the commission not elected or appointed by the EP, it's also not 'of' the EP, and doesn't really have an analogue with UK governments, And then you can throw in that even if it were it wouldn't really matter because of where powers sit within the European institutions, especially on things like legislative initiative and oversight. \n\nThe UK has any number of issues, but an election can and does change the direction of government, that's simply not true of the EU, it is an intergovernmental organization at the end of the day, the democratic elements are bolt-on's and there is still all the tension between member state powers and the EP.", "437" ], [ "> however if we might be pedantic for a moment, one side is trying to maintain access with a binary in/out and the other is simply trying to not have a reduction in their sphere. \n\nBoth sides are trying to maintain access and it's only binary in the sense that there has to be an agreement for any level of access to continue. The UK and EU have obviously both been negotiating about what that level of access looks like, and what conditions apply.\n\n > The EU is losing nothing that they wont already have with other countries (there are 27 of them) whilst the UK will lose access which it cannot mitigate or replicate elsewhere. A deal is advantageous to both sides but its only the EU that can say yes.\n\nThe EU can't say yes in isolation though, it requires both the UK and EU to agree... Moreover, the EU stands to lose privileged access to the UK market (the reverse is obviously also true..), that will lead to costs, there is no alternative market that is just waiting to take up the slack from changes to UK/EU trade, and obviously if EU goods become more expensive, that makes both domestic and non-EU competitors more attractive. And specifically on the linked article, there is nowhere else the EU can go to get access to UK waters.\n\nBeyond the immediately practical, you also have the wider issues around influence. If there isn't a mutually beneficial agreement, the UK simply wont sign up to it, and obviously the EU's peak point of leverage in that context is now. If the EU/UK deal is the first comprehensive deal that the UK enters into, that will shape the UK's future trading approaches to some extent, if the UK instead has to pivot to look to mitigate the impact of no-deal with the EU, it makes it more likely that the UK moves away from the EU..\n\nYou also have the broader issue in terms of the EU as an economic and political project too. It is after all a large trading block that is looking to become significant player on the world stage, one that is trying to assert influence regionally and globally. But if it can't conclude an FTA with the UK it will not have an FTA in place with any of its three largest trading partners, with three of the four largest non-EU economies.. Not only that, it'll have failed to reach an agreement with a country that currently has exactly the same regulatory approaches it does..\n\nIt goes well beyond the potential to shift business and adapt to the new trading environment, there are a huge number of factors that make it very attractive to the EU to put an FTA in place sooner rather than later. But obviously not at any cost, any agreement has to be mutually agreeable, and if that can't be achieved it'd indicate a major failure on the part of both the UK and the EU.", "631" ], [ "You can (and should) go after anyone directly involved in the commission of a war crime (and most of the examples given are individual actions, torture, rape, killings etc..), and then those who were in command who were complicit, failed to prevent a war crime, or were in any way involved in a cover up. \n\nIf you want to address larger issues (like states deciding to go to war illegally) you have a much more complicated situation, but you can go after the people who made the decisions.\n\nAnd we have courts, investigators, legislation and all the rest of it to ensure that where there are problems, they can be investigated. \n\nThat all seems pretty fundamental, indeed the Rules of War are taught to members of the armed forces (and refreshed regularly..), it's not news that you can't torture a prisoner, or kill them out of hand..", "733" ], [ "> UvdL: The EU wants to improve everyone's lives by continually raising standards and improving society - all we ask is that you do the same, at the same time\n\nAlso <PERSON>: But also don't improve your standards beyond where ours are,, because that'd be a barrier to our products..\n\nCome on.\n\nThe EU doesn't just want the UK to not regress, it also doesn't want the UK in a position where EU exporters face regulatory barriers where their standards are lower.", "631" ], [ "Christ I hope not. As much as I want to see an agreement, any long term fudge is just kicking the can and compounding the cost with little or no likely benefit to either side. If the UK and EU really can't come to an agreement at this point (given how much they have in common) I can't see that changing much over the course of another 18-24 months. We'll just end up with another long period of broad inaction with a frantic rush at the end.\n\nAn implementation period for a negotiated agreement would be sensible enough, but a vague 'lets just keep talking' position would be pretty useless.", "631" ], [ "> So you're saying the EU are scared of the UK improving standards more than the EU?\n\nIt's not scared of it, but it's the other half of the same coin. If you have lower standards but relatively open trade you could in theory undercut a trading partner by having cheaper production. If you have higher, or just different standards you create a regulatory hurdle that reduces the ability of a trading partner to compete in your market.\n\n > Is this the same UK that gave the world Mad Cow disease by feeding sheep to cows, persecutes its weakest via the DWP, wants to remove human rights conditions, and gut the NHS by selling it out? \n\nErm.... The UK also bans fur farming, and the production of foie gras (but as an EU member can't prevent imports), and obviously the EU has no say over the DWP or NHS as it is. More to the point, even with all of that the UK exceeds EU standards in many of the areas where it is permitted to. The UK isn't going to turn into a low regulation, low tax country outside of the EU.\n\n > I don't think the EU is worried about improving things to match the UK, we all know the UK government is going to fuck about even more than it has.\n\nThe EU is almost certainly concerned that it's exports could suffer if the UK creates regulatory barriers, not least because they have done the same to others in the past and it can skew FTA's (see the issues with Canadian Wheat for example..).\n\nThe reason the EU was seeking alignment rather than non-regression is because alignment means that the UK follows EU regulatory approaches, whether they are better or worse, and so removes barriers for EU exports as well as providing protection for the EU's internal market.", "631" ], [ "Arguably it's clearer if you look at the changes to the PD (between May's initial draft and the one <PERSON> passed). [The Institute for Government covers it all very well here,](_URL_0_) but it's worth looking at the change from: \n\n*Both parties will uphold standards applicable at the end of the transition period in the areas of state aid, competition, social and environmental standards, climate change and tax.*\n\n*Appropriate mechanisms to ensure effective domestic implementation, enforcement and dispute settlement, reflecting \"relevant Union and international standards\" and including \"a robust and comprehensive framework for competition and state aid control\".*\n\nTo:\n\n*UK is committing to level playing field provisions in accordance with standards in place at the end of the transition period.*\n\nThe IFS's view on the change explicitly references the shift from dynamic alignment too:\n\n*No longer any commitment to build on the level playing field arrangements provided for in the* *Northern Ireland protocol**; instead both parties commit to upholding existing standards at the end of the transition period. Rather than the “dynamic alignment” suggested previously, the government looks to be closer to agreeing “non-regression”.*\n\n*Greater emphasis on international principles and rules, including explicit mention of the Paris Climate Accord.*", "631" ], [ "> Thanks again for a trained discussion. Only time will tell which of us is correct. I'm much more concerned for the impact on my children and future generations and I think the risk/reward makes it not worth it, but it's a done deal (and let's hope we get one).\n\nOddly enough I'm pretty much focused on the impact on my children and future generations rather than the immediate impact too. It's a bit annoying how much focus there has been on the immediate rather than the long term potential (and potential costs). \n\n > It's good to come across a <PERSON> supporter who isn't saying \"you lost get over it\" or \"sovereignty\" with little more to contribute than that.\n\nThere are far more of 'us' than there are of 'them' in context, it's just that the debate tends to be quite toxic. There is an underlying assumption around the reasons people voted leave and it gets nasty pretty quickly outside of leave echo chambers (and they, like their remain equivalents tend to be pretty pointless...).\n\n > I'm fine with us disagreeing - brexit is done. I just wish that we had someone more competent at the helm. \n\nWell there is something we can agree on. I'm incredibly pissed off that we are leaving under a Tory government, I saw <PERSON> as someone who could be very credible on Brexit and Labour managed not to make use of him (and he had enough other faults, but still). That said, it's not about the current government, but the next, and the one after that etc.. \n\n > I struggle to believe even <PERSON>, for all his bluster and all the pressure from the ERG, wants us to leave with no deal, but I can easily imagine him finding himself backed into a corner and letting it happen anyway.\n\nI don't think he does either, and the ERG are a lot weaker now than they were in 2019, so of there is a deal to be done I think we'll get there. I'm still mostly optimistic, but I'd be happier without the stupid political gaming.\n\n > As you said. We will see .... Fingers crossed!\n\nIndeed. Cheers and good night. \nI struggle to believe even <PERSON>, for all his bluster and all the pressure from the ERG, wants us to leave with no deal, but I can easily imagine him finding himself backed into a corner and letting it happen anyway.", "564" ], [ "> That’s a fair point. I wish we weren’t a country with a significant number of antivaxxers who needed such an advertisement but fair enough, at the end of the day, it’s no harm, no foul\n\nWe aren't, but the numbers are still higher than I'd like!\n\n > I’m not sure if we’re on the same wavelength here but we’ve got <PERSON> saying we’re a better country than France, Belgium, the US etc which is why we have it first. There’s <PERSON> saying that getting the vaccine finally makes us proud to be British. It’s being framed as if it’s a British triumph when it’s categorically not. (No beef from my end. I’m just tired of it being treated like the brits and only the brits made the actual vaccine)\n\nThose were all daft statements, but they were about the approval not creation of the vaccine (the incorrect suggestion being that the EU would have held the UK back, or that other regulators weren't doing as good a job as the UK). I don't want to take anything away from UK regulators and I'm glad they managed to get through the approval process quickly, but at the same time the statements by <PERSON> were insanely unhelpful..\n\nI touched on that [more broadly elsewhere in this thread earlier:](_URL_0_)\n\n > > Fact is this 'Covid nationalism' has been around way before vaccines were mentioned. \n\nIt's absolutely stupid too, there were people (a very small number thankfully) suggesting that the UK could use the Oxford vaccine for leverage at one point.. Happily very few countries have gone that way (a bit of bluster here and there from a minority of people) and there has been a vast amount of international cooperation..\n\nRealistically we should be celebrating that, it's a global effort that has achieved this, none of the 'national' vaccines are truly national and countries have spent vast amounts of money and effort to get to a point where they get a vaccine and been clear in their intent to make that vaccine available to as many people, globally, as possible.", "374" ], [ "IIRC The UK left Euratom because while separate from the EU, it is governed by EU institutions (It came out of the ECSC after all) including the European Commission and is under the jurisdiction of the ECJ. It also requires freedom of employment for nuclear specialists. \n\nThe EMA on the other hand is an outright EU agency, it's also not a replacement for the national regulators (but a coordinating and harmonizing body) so in that sense it makes sense for the UK not to be part of it. The UK has (and had) a medical regulator anyway and while cooperation with the EMA makes sense, membership doesn't outside of the EU.\n\nEASA includes the EEA members, plus Switzerland and arguably the UK could have remained a member (if the EU/EEA agreed..)..", "631" ], [ "That's somewhat double edged, there is already a lot of disruption because of COVID, brexit isn't likely to make that significantly worse and to a certain extent we are going to have a recovery from that so adding an additional issue when things have recovered is just as much of an issue. Not to mention that we also extend this period of uncertainty (that has its own costs). At best we are creating larger costs over a longer period.", "631" ], [ "I'd argue it's the right thing to do, I haven't seen a huge amount of push back either. If anything I'm mostly seeing people from the remain side pushing the notion that they'd oppose it by default (in much the same way as some people were arguing that leavers would get upset if non-EU migration rose to offset non-EU migration). They aren't really comparable though, and the notion that the leave side would have massive issues with it only follows where people have made the mistake in thinking that most leave voters are horribly racist and xenophobic).", "564" ], [ "> Well... the EU wasn’t the cause of most of our problems and yet we’re severing our ties to it.\n\nYeah, we are leaving a political union that hasn't been a great fit and where there was significant popular opposition to continued membership.. That doesn't seem to apply here at all.\n\n > Never doubt the ignorance of the electorate if a competent snakeoil salesman is around.\n\nI'm not sure it's ignorance of anything to be honest.", "437" ], [ "> I mean it’s not smaller, \n\nIt is a smaller issue, but still a significant one. The income thresholds shouldn't exist, but they are low and the number of people with an issue (so in the circumstance where it's relevant and not meeting the criteria) is limited.\n\n > we’re making Imperial claims over Hong Kong citizens as a flex rather than protecting the rights of our own citizens.\n\nWe aren't making imperial claims over anyone, BNO passports are something that HKers can get hold of, not something being forced on them. The same goes for migration to the UK. \n\n > The restrictions on spouses are for immigration PR but all that goes out of the window when it’s a matter of Empire.\n\nThe UK doesn't have an empire.. And yes, there are more restrictions on spouses than on various other groups (and less than many others). It needs to be addressed, but it's not really relevant to the issue at hand either. It's not like one impacts the other.\n\n > It’s fucking bullshit.\n\nBecause living up to the responsibilities that the UK has to HK is somehow a negative? You'd get more sympathy from me if this wasn't entirely voluntary on the part of people in HK and if China hadn't breached its obligations with regard to both HK and BNO's in HK.", "79" ], [ "It's not a bad approach. It's also notable that the UK is looking at a lot of the other service oriented economies, if the UK can drive for broader service agreements that'd be a pretty big win (The EU has arguably been reticent about that, even when it was looking at TISA, at least in part because it sat at a lower priority). \n\nCPTPP membership would certainly be interesting, coupled with a UK/EU FTA and a potential UK/US FTA at some point in the future that'd be a solid basis for UK trade.", "631" ], [ "Not really no, the UK is very unlikely to drop below the level of EU environmental protections if anything the reverse is much more likely, and workers right sit well above EU minimums in many areas anyway (and the EU is not above gutting them to deal with economic issues as it did with Greece). \n\nIt creates an issue whereby the EU, regulating to address its own members concerns negatively impacts the UK and the UK is unable to act in its own interests and in relation to its own international trade. Non-regression, or even a common floor would be reasonable enough (and address all the issues you've listed above..), but a one way dynamic alignment means the UK can't regulate appropriately and can neither reduce nor improve the regulatory approaches it takes.\n\nIt's also a pretty absurdly excessive demand to make of a trading partner.", "631" ], [ "> I realise, but we are acting like we do to appeal to certain parts of the population.\n\nI'm not sure that makes any sense either, the UK is far from the only country acting on this, China is clearly in the wrong, the UK pushed this unilaterally, essentially disregarding public opinion (although public opinion, remain and leave, left and right seems to have lined up behind it). It's not a policy designed to pander, it's a reaction to action by China.\n\n > The point is, why is it the priority. \n\nBecause China is arresting dissidents now, has passed problematic legislation in HK in a problematic fashion and is now threatening the rights of BNO's in HK.\n\n > Why should people on the other side of the world have more rights than me as a citizen, and my high-earning tax-paying wife.\n\nThey don't have more rights than you as a citizen, and if you or your wife is high-earning you don't have an issue in terms of a spousal visa. The risk there are for couples that are not high-earning given the thresholds.", "839" ], [ "> Lists a load of pie in the sky reasons that will likely go the opposite way due to our incompetent and corrupt government who you’ve just given 100% power to. A government that can’t even take a pay freeze/cut during a pandemic and economic crisis are totally going to drop VAT.\n\nThe point is that the UK can't do any of those things at all in the EU. It's an incredible bit of short term thinking to look at the current government and then take a position about the next 25-50+ years of this countries future on the basis of which muppet is currently in power. \n\n > So you voted for a government based on Brexit alone. \n\nI didn't vote for this government at all.. I voted Labour.\n\n > Even though they have a history of not giving a crap about the people in this country, who cause austerity and like to line their own pockets. So not only do half the country have to live with being dragged out the EU we get another term of the Tories fucking us to go with it. Bravo, give yourself a pat on the back for all those brexit benefits that will never come to fruition.\n\nThe UK being out of the EU is the aim, that is happening. That means that UK governments will have responsibilities in these areas, that's the benefit.. Having these decisions made in the UK, subject to domestic political accountability.\n\n > Other parties in the election ran multiple policies that benefit the people of this country. \n\nYes... I know, I voted and campaigned for one of them.\n\n > But all it took was bumbling <PERSON>/<PERSON> shouting about Brexit means brexit and that’s all it took to throw away actual progress for regression.\n\nLeaving the EU is progress, not regression. \n\n > And now here we are. A country in absolute shambles and chasing the US for poor quality chicken and title for most embarrassing country.\n\nThe UK isn't chasing the US for anything...", "564" ], [ "> The more immigration the more we have to spend. You can't just keep chucking money at something whilst making the situation worse.\n\nImmigration creates both pressure (on services, and housing etc..) and brings additional economic activity. If taxes are set appropriately and spending meets the requirements in the right places, you can have positive migration, see the benefits from that and mitigate the costs. \n\nIt's not a one sided issue, immigration brings wealth into the country, increases capacity and increases the size of the UK market, it drives investment and it provides a net benefit to our ability to sell to other markets. All in that should balance the cost at the very least, and in the long term provide a greater benefit.", "113" ], [ "It's partially because people don't push back, those presenting those views rarely get challenged on them and as a result seem to think that everyone feels the same way (it's the same issue you have with echo chambers and anti-LGBT/anti-semitic positions, and the response should be the same, it is unacceptable..). It also leads to an almost impossible situation if you want to discuss addressing the issues that the community faces broadly, no-one wants to be seen as in support because the perception of the community is so negative, but we'll never see a more positive perception if people aren't challenged.", "647" ], [ "> Did some quick reading and read that the 500mbps on the powerline adapters is just referring to data transfer speeds and not internet speeds and the port itself is 100/10?\n\nYeah, that's some reasonably shoddy advertising, the claim is that the TP-LINK TL-PA411 AV500is HomePlug AV standard compliant and so capable of high-speed data transfer rates of up to 500Mbps, and while that's true, it's between adapters, given it is only equipped with a fast ethernet port, you won't see more than 100Mbps at any given end point.", "938" ], [ "This'd make a whole lot more sense if boomers were a monolithic group and if the other generations (before and after) didn't also include people wish problematic views.\n\nIf you intended to be intolerant of intolerance then great, but really it seems that you are presenting a prejudice against a given age group because of the actions of a subset of those that are part of that. It's not unlike calling all gypsies criminals, or suggesting that all Muslims are homophobes..", "871" ], [ "So we are going to use 'voted <PERSON>' as a proxy for intolerance and ignore the large minority that didn't vote <PERSON>, not to mention the large minority of non-boomers who did vote <PERSON>?\n\nAgain, this is like calling all gypsies criminals based on reported arrests, or suggesting that all Muslims are homophobes on the basis of polling around views on homosexuality. \n\nAttack the people who hold intolerant views by all means, but the moment you turn it into a binary issue between generations it lacks both credibility and any justification. It's basically othering on a generational basis.", "845" ], [ "> If that is who you vote to represent you and your nation, that is who you are.\n\nWell for starters, I don't vote Tory. And secondly, a large chunk of the boomers didn't, and a large chunk of young ger voters did, including (weirdly..) one in five 18-25 year olds.\n\nSo again, I'd suggest that it is problematic to try and lump in a lot of people with very different views into one single one, and try to ascribe views that they don't hold to them, because it makes it easier for you to point at a group and define them as the problem. Even if we took your view above as gospel, your issue would be with Tory voters, not boomers, and there are a lot more tory voters than there are boomers.", "871" ], [ "You could just run a cron job that pings something every once in a while and if it fails have it execute the python script (and anything else you need to do when your connection comes back up). That way you could only run the login script if a number of conditions are met (failure to ping a couple hosts over a number of attempts) and obviously execute any number of actions on failure. Plus if you are using cron you don't need to have something running constantly and can tweak how often you execute it.", "117" ], [ "> Right so your problem here is you don't understand basic statistics.\n\nThat doesn't seem to be my problem no.\n\n > No one cares if every single person of a certain group is exactly the same. I am sure there are plenty of homophobic gay people out there, hundreds of them! It is irrelevant.\n\nActually yes, I do care. And again, the number of boomers not voting <PERSON> isn't tiny based on the polling, it is a significant minority.. Using the data tables from your graph above, you are talking about 45% or so of boomers who vote not voting <PERSON>. If you take into account non-voters, that increases (non-voters didn't vote <PERSON> after all) further to more than 50%..\n\nSo less than half of boomers actively voted for the Tories, of those that voted, 45% did not vote <PERSON>. But you think I have an issue in understanding basic statistics, and think it's sensible to lump that 45% of non-Tory voters in with Tory voters because it serves your narriative more neatly?", "845" ], [ "> as we cannot remain a leading first world nation if we become the Cuba of Europe with hostile relations with the super-power on our doorstep.\n\nYou understand that regardless of the outcome of these trade talks, the UK and EU will not have hostile relations, that the EU isn't a superpower and that the UK won't be subject to a Cuba like embargo right?\n\nNeither the UK nor the EU are likely to capitulate, either there is an FTA in place, or the UK and EU end up trading on a similar basis as the EU trades with its other two largest trading partners, it involves a bit more friction, and more costs, it's not economic isolation, never mind political isolation or active hostility..", "631" ], [ "> The EU is an economic super-power. Not sure why you brexiteers consistently reject reality. Its simply a matter of fact I'm stating here.\n\nI'm not sure what the definition of 'economic super-power' is, but sure, the EU as a large trading block may meet whatever criteria you set of that, but that isn't the same as a super-power as we'd accept the term. It'd be like claiming that the UK is a super-power (because I've decided to define it is a financial services super-power). So no, you weren't stating fact, you were at best misusing a term to mean something else, significantly changing the meaning of your claim.\n\n > We don't have hostile relations yet.\n\nNo, we don't. In fact we have good bilateral relationships with most EU member states and the only issue at present is around concluding a trade agreement.\n\n > Just wait until the brexiteers start their blame game going in order to absolve themselves of responsibilty for what they've done. We all know its coming.\n\nWe all know what's coming? More to the point how does that turn the UK's relationship with the EU and EU members from one of close cooperation (albeit outside of the EU) into one that is actively hostile? This sounds like a bit of a fantasy to be honest..\n\n > Doesn't require an embargo, hostile political relationships cause their own sort of economic freeze.\n\nExcept of course even with a no-deal exit you can expect a large amount of bilateral trade, and a hostile political relationship is unlikely.. \n\nAnd of course you've now moved the UK from being like Cuba, to the UK being like any number of the EU's other major trading partners.", "631" ], [ "> I was hoping for a much more aggressive response from the UK.\n\nThe Competition and Markets Authority has just set up a new dedicated Digital Markets Unit to regulate this area, so it'd seem that the UK Government didn't feel that self-regulation was functioning as well as it should. The UK also brought forward its digital services tax (to which the US objected quite strongly..) and the suggestion now is that penalties on companies like facebook that seek to muddy the distinction between where revenue comes from and where they book it will be fined based on global income...\n\nI'd suggest that that's reasonably sensible (although the detail will be interesting) and probably not what <PERSON> was after.", "631" ], [ "> It doesn’t have to be literal war for relations between the UK and the EU to get cold very quick \n\nSure.. But compared to most countries that the EU deals with, the UK is pretty damn well aligned almost by default. The UK and EU have slew of shared interests, both economically and otherwise. Those aren't going away. The UK also has very broad bilateral agreements in place with EU member states in a slew of areas, and works with EU and non-EU members internationally.. \n\n > and the EU has plenty of economic Andy political means to make life miserable for the UK if the latter is seen as attempting to undercut or free-ride them on trade.\n\nIn theory it has a lot of clout. In practice though it mostly doesn't. It has failed to address Turkey due to internal differences, the common foreign policy approach is a mess and it can't leverage it's economic power effectively to support its foreign policy because of how its competencies are split.\n\nThere is only so much the EU can do, more to the point, the UK isn't china, it doesn't want, nor is it in a position to undercut the EU and 'free-ride them' on trade. The EU is as worried about the UK applying its domestic standards on EU trade as it is on undercutting them (As that will create more of an issue for EU exporters..). \n\n > The UK simply does not have the power and leverage to become a fourth pillar in a world dominated by the EU/US/China. \n\nThe world isn't dominated by the EU/US and China though.. At the moment the US is the dominant power, China is an aspiring superpower and he EU lags that. If the UK were to join CPTPP that block alone would be larger than the EU.. More to the point, I don't thinkhe only options available is either:\n\n the UK is looking to be a fourth pillar, it seems far keener to look globally rather than regionally and build in the international rules based order, rather than lock itself into some sort of attempt at a multi-polar challenge to the US.\n\n > the only options available is either:\n\nNo they aren't...", "631" ], [ "> Look. Like you said we’ve been over it thousands of times. We actually had a chance to make change inside the EU. We had veto rights and a lot of political power.\n\nWe had some political power, but it was pretty constrained. Hence the UK being on the periphery, its one thing to say that the UK had a hand in setting the direction, but you also have to acknowledge that it couldn't do so given the stark differences in the view of what the EU should be..\n\n > Now we’re outside, those things won’t change anyway and we’re going to pretty much have no power whatsoever. \n\nOver the EU? No, obviously not..\n\n > We’re now little Britain surrounded by giants. \n\nThat's daft. The UK is larger than every economy on the planet bar 5, has significant soft power and regional influence. The UK isn't a superpower, nor has it been for almost a century and it has neither illusions about that nor any intent to try and reclaim that status. But then the EU isn't a superpower either. \n\nIf the UK were to look at something like the CPTPP it'd be part of a block that's larger than the EU, but without the same political entanglements, or the regional focus for example.\n\n > We don’t have the might of the EU when it comes to negotiating trade deals. Look at the Japanese deal that pretty much sells out our peoples privacy.\n\nAnd yet we are rolling over EU trade agreements, and going forward will be able to build on them.. As to the Japan deal, I support ORG and I have issues with the way privacy protections are implemented and the lack of value placed on them, but it's absurd to suggest it 'sells them out'.\n\n > There’s a reason most economists and experts think it’s stupid and people like <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON> encourage it.\n\nThere are lots of reasons why people supported and opposed the UK leaving the EU, some were good reasons some weren't. I'm sure that you'd agree that some of the reasons given by people like Lord <PERSON>'s (the chairman of the then chairman of the remain campaign) to remain are pretty problematic (suggested that leaving would mean that wages of low skilled workers would rise, hurting UK businesses).\n\n > The negatives just far outweigh the positives which won’t happen anyway under a self serving government full of chaos profiteers. \n\nAgain, that rather depends on your priorities doesn't it. \n\n > This country is about to become a whole lot poorer \n\nNo, it probably isn't. It may, for a time get richer more slowly though, and that is a problem, and shouldn't be dismissed, but it's rather different.\n\n > Life will become more expensive for the average man and the youth will have fewer prospects and freedoms. As someone who was on track to working in the EU I’m now stuck in no mans land.\n\nI agree, FoM will be the biggest loss the UK faces from leaving the EU, and its likely that inflation will increase by around 1% compared to where it is now. That is not devastating, but it is a cost.\n\n > It’s yet to be seen how regressive it will be but to say it’s progressive is based in some make belief fantasy world where everything goes perfectly and we’re not lead by conmen\n\nI don't need a world where everything goes perfectly to achieve what I'm looking for from the UK's exit from the EU. Largely I just need the UK to be out of the EU, and to be able to vote.. I have that.", "631" ], [ "> Well, if automotive and related industries collapse, or farmers and fishers can't sell their goods, plenty will feel it very directly.\n\nObviously, and at every point where there has been significant economic change, some people will have seen negative outcomes while others positive ones. The question tends to be around the scale of risk and the time frame of the change. A short term collapse (As with manufacturing under <PERSON>) would be pretty devastating to a lot of communities, a more gradual pivot (As we've seen over the last quarter century) significantly less so, with more scope for people to pick up the benefits. \n\nPrior to brexit, as an EU member, the UK saw increasingly poor distribution of the benefits of membership and ever growing inequality and it has had far less control over its future development than it would outside of the EU.", "841" ], [ "Not being part of a regional trade block and having the competence to enter into agreements independently in a way that suits the UK? The EU has been focused largely on goods for a long time, there are a slew of countries that want to see broader trade in services agreements, the UK is one (as is singapore, switzerland and a number of other countries) and there is an opportunity there now.\n\nAs to the point on a multi-polar world, if the political noise in the EU about the EU being a competitor or adversary to the US (and China) plays out then the EU seeking to isolate itself from the US and China is hardly a good look, or something that the UK would benefit from.", "631" ], [ "> There are 3 superpowers, or regional centres of gravity:\n\nThere is one superpower, the US. It is (and has been for some time) in decline, but it is the only country that qualifies. China is catching up but lagging. The EU is nowhere close, it'd need to go through a massive integrationist shift to get there.\n\n > From economic strength flows everything else.\n\nIf you are talking about a country you might be right, but the EU isn't a country. It can't join up all the elements needed to actually projecet power or push its influence..\n\n > We were a part of the decision making structure of the EU, now we are not. Don't be surprised if the EU makes decisions we don't like, and don't be under the illusion there will be anything we can do about it.\n\nThe EU could make decisions that impacted the UK in far more detail, and with far less control on the UK side when the UK was a member. Outside of the EU the UK has no say in how the EU operates, but it is autonomous enough and has a choice about how it interacts with the rest of the world..\n\n > For example - on Jan 1st the EU will decide whether to allow UK citizens to enter the EU, or to bar them like those from almost all other countries that have not reduced Covid to an acceptable level.\n\nSure... That's a decision for the EU, and the UK of course will also be able to decide whether to allow EU citizens to enter the UK and on what basis on the back of COVID. If the UK were in the EU of course that wouldn't be the case, UK nationals could still travel within the EU for leisure purposes, and all the UK would lose in return is its entire trade policy, internal market regulation, choices around tax, and a slew of other minor, but important elements.. Coome on.", "437" ], [ "Just as an aside, the risk with private healthcare is fragmentation and loss of control, it's also (in a UK context) incredibly difficult to reverse privatisation trends. Keeping the profit motive as far away from care delivery as possible, and ensuring that there is common ownership of the infrastructure and popular control over approaches is pretty important in my view.\n\nAlthough obviously about as far away from being viable in the US as... well, I was going to say <PERSON> remaining in office, but maybe I'll go with alchemy being real instead.", "36" ], [ "> The inequality was due to Westminster's own choices, nothing to do with the EU. The same is true of regional neglect.\n\nMost of it was (domestic policy has more of an impact on the economy than anything else after all), some wasn't (the EU does limit state intervention and embeds various approaches), but it could be both blamed on the EU (so reducing UK accountability) and underlines the issue with GDP as a measure that people will see as relevant to them in terms of Brexit. Slower GDP growth would be seen as a positive if it were more equally distributed for example.\n\n > Moreover, what becomes possible on leaving the EU is easily overstated; the UK will feel the shifting winds of international competition more keenly, and will often find itself more constrained to win concessions.\n\nThe other side of that coin is that what the EU is able to achieve is also easily overstated, and the benefits to the EU generally, vs member states specifically tends to get lost. You could well argue that the EU's focus on goods tends to favour German and France (And to some extent Italy) over the UK in international trade. Moreover, the UK may well find itself needing to win concessions, but it is more able to tailor those concessions.\n\n > Keeping up may well also require rethinking our social model, at least to an extent.\n\nThat needs to happen anyway, we have several major issues that are going to come to a head with or without the EU.", "631" ], [ "That is the aim. Obviously in the short term, this maintains the current position, reduces disruption for both Vietnam and the UK and hopefully becomes something to build on. If the UK does decide that joining the CPTPP makes sense there is a reasonably good chance that UK/Vietnam trade and the broader UK/Vietnam relationship can deepen too. \n\nThere is a lot potential good for both countries in that, especially given the massive amount of progress Vietnam has made in a slew of areas over the last few decades.", "631" ], [ "Obviously it's a bit of a false comparison (diseases tend to be vastly deadlier than wars), but it doesn't half give you some appreciation of the scale of the disaster.. More to the point, a fairly decent chunk of those 3000 were almost certainly avoidable, I mean even of the countries in Europe that have been struggling, only Italy exceeded its first wave peak and have been on a downward trend for a while, the US looks to be accelerating upward with no new measures (as far as I've seen) being generally introduced in quite a few areas to mitigate it.", "912" ], [ "What does the threat profile look like for older equipment these days? I tend to use older ex-enterprise kit at home simply because it tends to have capabilities that cheaper consumer kit doesn't, but I'm always a tad concerned that I don't see security updates (although I do track vulnerability reporting and it seems as safe as most new consumer gear, especially with mitigation). \n\nIs there any compelling reason to grab a cheap consumer AP over a more expensive bit of Cisco kit from a couple of years ago from a security perspective?", "370" ], [ "> Why didn't the UK prioritise service trade with the EU?\n\nYou'd have to ask the negotiators, but broadly it's partially because it'd have been difficult to do in the time frame and partially because the UK is pretty competitive when it comes to services anyway and the EU doesn't have as much choice in terms of alternatives. The EU's single market in services is also very fractured as it is (again, an indication of the issues that the UK has with the EU more broadly ). It's also arguably easier to export services absent an agreement than goods, with less of an impact on the value of those service exports.\n\nIn terms of the fragmentation of the single market in services, it's also important to note that the regulation of services remains a shared competence between the EU and member states (and the difficulty the EU has had with mixed/complex agreements underscores the risk there). That's also why there is a gap in the EU's FTA's in terms of services.\n\n > Why do FTA's rarely do anything when it comes to services...\n\nServices aren't generally directly affected by tariffs when compared to goods, but can be significantly affected by non-tariff barriers. That makes bilateral agreements, especially alongside traditional FTA's much more complicated and why international frameworks are more viable, and indeed why separate services agreements between countries with similar aims are more viable (and could form the basis of a better international framework..). It's also worth noting that for many of the UK's service export targets (like the US) policies on the trade in services are almost always considerably more liberal than their GATS schedules and so trade in goods.\n\nThat doesn't mean that there isn't pretty broad scope though, the UK is obviously in a somewhat privileged position in terms of language and law, but even beyond that there have been a couple of aborted pushes to move forward with things like TISA, as well as the current focus on how to deal with digital services.", "631" ], [ "> Why aren't we mourning? Why are our flags not at half mast? Why is the media not showing photos of the lost 24 hours a day? The fact that we are willfully desensitizing ourselves is very concerning. The US has possibly lost the last of its humanity.\n\nIt's a good question, but the US seems to have a strange relationship with health and avoidable deaths in a few areas, so that may be part of the answer. COVID also seems to have been politicised to a unique degree in the US. It's pretty bizarre to watch (even from a country that is not far off where the US has been up until now and with an often similarly inept, if not close to as batshit, government).", "912" ], [ "Fair enough.. I ended up just rewriting the script so, this works for me:\n\n # Imports\n # Import all things that we'll use\n \n import socket\n import time\n from twill.commands import formclear, showforms, fv, formaction, submit, go\n \n # Some definitions\n # Define the things we'll use later\n \n gateway = \"<IP_ADDRESS>\" \t\t\t\t\t# this should be your gateway IP, not my dev box..\n sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) \t# Same as your socket connection\n sock.settimeout(3)\t\t\t\t\t\t# Added a timeout, because..\n sleep = 1\t\t\t\t\t\t\t# Set sleep time if there is a connection, was 120\n result = sock.connect_ex((gateway,80)) \t\t\t\t# Get the result from the socket connection\n \n # Functions\n def login():\t\t\t\t\t# This is essentially your login function\n \turl = gateway #\"gateway_IP_portal\"\t# the gateway url as defined above\t\n \tmy_username = \"username\"\t\t# Form username\n \tmy_password = \"password\"\t\t# Form password\n \tgo(url)\t\t\t\t\t# Were to post to\n \tformclear('1')\t\t\t\t# Clear all values in the form.\n \tfv('1', 'username', my_username)\t# Value (form, field, value)\n \tfv('1', 'password', my_password)\t# And again...\n \tsubmit('0')\t\t\t\t# Submit using the 0th submit..\n \n # Do things\n # A simple if statement.. \n \n if result == 0:\t\t\t\t\t# If the return code from the socket connect is 0\n \tprint(\"Trying to login...\")\t\t# let someone know (should also write to a logfile rather than just stdout.)\n \ttime.sleep(sleep)\t\t\t# Sleep for the sleep period before attempting a login\n \tlogin()\t\t\t\t\t# The Logiin Function\n \tsock.close()\t\t\t\t# Close the socket\n \texit(0)\t\t\t\t\t# Exit with a 0\n \n else:\t\t\t\t\t\t# If the return code from the socket connect is anything other than 0\n \tprint \"Port is closed\"\t\t\t# let someone know (should also write to a logfile rather than just stdout..)\n \tsock.close()\t\t\t\t# Close the socket\n \texit(1)\t\t\t\t\t# Exit with a 1\n \n\nI don't write a lot of python anymore so.. In any case all I've really done is create an if statement that's a tad cleaner and worked on the basis of the return code from the socket connection (zero being success), which seemed to be missing from your script, and I've pulled some definitions to the top and added a socket timeout. \n\nYou'll want to add your values back in obviously.", "117" ], [ "> Wait what. No, it was because the UK prioritised ending freedom of movement of people and \"sovereignity\" over trade in services. And still does.\n\nAnd yet it is still negotiating on trade in goods...? The UK could have pursued an agreement on services too. The issue of FoM (well, all the four freedoms) aren't really related in the context of an agreement with the EU as such, well beyond the UK leaving the SM. The EU has very limited agreements on services with other partners after all and there are components of service related elements in the other agreements the UK is taking up.\n\n > It is, but it's because reducing trade barriers is hard. Sovereignity and that sort of thing.\n\nOr in context, a lack of priority because you have 20+ partners with different priorities. The UK couldn't however easily strike separate services agreements within the EU, it can outside of the EU.\n\n > No it's not. You can't export services at all if eg. your professional qualifications are not recognised (not to mention if you're unable to get work visa) Cross-border service trade becomes extremely limited. Reducing tariffs is easy, reducing trade barriers is difficult.\n\nThe UK's largest service export market is the US, there is no services agreement in place between the US and EU at present, trade is on WTO terms so.. No?\n\n > And still that's not the UK's aim with its biggest trading partner. And what FTA's can do is very limited (see CETA which goes further than any other FTA).\n\nWhat isn't the UK's aim with the EU? Trade in services with the EU will be on the same basis as trade in services with the US from next year..\n\n > So, is the UK abandoning the current idea of sovereignity in order to liberate trade?\nNo?\n\n > What actually is the goal of the UK's trade policy?\n\nAs I understand it it's low tariff liberal global trade, while maintaining standards and to look at building a framework for services. Not a regionally focused approach that is the hands of the EU and so shared across a slew of other countries that have competing interests. \n\n\n >", "631" ], [ "> The UK currently is larger than every economy bar 5. Its yet to be seen if that sticks outside the EU. We had a good position as the door into the EU for countries and a lot of our economy is probably thanks to being a member of the EU.\n\nIt's not going to shift because the UK leaves the EU though is it? And for clarity, our economy is not the size it is thanks to being an EU member, that is a component, but not a significant one..\n\n > Ah, the CPTPP. We’ll be trading with our closest neighbours there then. Great for our economy and the environment..\n\nNo.. The EU/UK FTA that the UK is currently trying to put in place, plus the agreements with other European states that the UK has rolled over are intended to deal with trade with our closer neighbours. the CPTPP approach would form part of the UK's wider global trade. \n\n > Well, I hope you’re right and we prosper. \n\nSure.\n\n > But reality has us struggling to get any trade deals while our currency plummets, unemployment rises and our rights are discarded while chaos merchants like <PERSON> get to fill their pockets and we get privatised health care. Such a bright future.\n\nGood job that's not likely to happen to any significant degree then based on the current projections.\n\n > Brexit is a complete failure. And will no doubt fuck us harder than a pandemic. Lucky for us we get to do both at once.\n\nThe UK has left the EU, it is no longer part of a political and economic union that was both unpopular and somewhat problematic for the UK (hence it being on the periphery..). In that context, it has already been a success. Whether the UK does well outside of the EU or not is now down to the UK.", "631" ], [ "> Remember the main dispute of the UK government is that they want to resist being forced to increase worker rights and standards (the LPF) by the EU. You actually expect the Tories to negotiate in the interest of workers?\n\nThe LPF is not about increased workers rights. It's about the EU wanting the UK to maintain similar standards to the EU going forward so that the UK can neither undercut the EU by taking lower regulatory approaches, nor cut it out by having higher ones, and concerns around state aid etc.. It is absolutely not about workers rights, the UK has and will maintain workers rights above the level of the EU's minimums anyway.\n\nChrist.", "631" ], [ "> Because a deal like this would typically take years to negotiate - but in this case all that negotiation had already been done and both parties simply agreed to carry it over. It is misleading to look at this and say: \"See I told all those remainers that striking deals with other countries would be easy\"\n\nRight, but the UK now has that agreement with Singapore... You could argue that it's easier because there was an agreement to roll over (and it absolutely was), but the suggestion previously was that countries would seek concessions to roll over deals because the UK wasn't big enough, or worth having a similar agreement with, or that the UK simply couldn't negotiate roll overs at all.\n\nThis is the UK having the same agreement with a country as it had with the EU, while not being in the EU. So all the benefits of the trade agreement, without the costs around pooled sovereignty, it also means that the UK can build on the agreement, something it couldn't do inside the EU.\n\nSo this is a deal, it's now a UK/Singapore agreement and it both limits disruption, is not dependent on EU membership, and provides a starting point for future agreements.. \n\nIf one of the benefits of EU membership was this sort of agreement, then it would seem the UK has done a reasonable job to replicate the benefit without the costs.", "631" ], [ "That's a typo, it should have read:\n\nthat'd block EU exports to the UK.\n\n > You sound very confused, and you are ignoring the point that, despite our standards currently being higher, we refuse to guarantee we will not lower them. In fact the government just removed such an amendment recently.\n\nThe UK has agreed to non-regression in other FTA's already, I'm sure it'd be happy to agree to the same with the EU. What the EU is asking for is alignment, so maintaining similar regulations to the EU, even as the EU continues to regulate, so a one-way alignment. That's problematic obviously.\n\n", "631" ], [ "> Why exactly, if our standards are already higher already?\n\nBecause the EU doesn't want different standards between the UK or EU as it hinders market access? If the UK goes ahead and regulates differently that creates a preference for UK producers.. \n\nThe UK currently bans the production of things like foie gras and farmed fur for example, but can't prevent imports. If you want comedy, you currently have car manufacturers starting to suggest that the ban on the sale of ICE cars similar should be considered an access to market restriction that would derogate from the fully harmonised provisions of the type approval framework within the EU.. The UK may well look to allow things like pulse fishing (given the relative environmental impact of trawling) and ban some types of trawling which would disadvantage EU fleets.. And that's before we get to things like subsidy rules, where arguably the risk is less that the UK will suddenly change direction and make massive market interventions, but more that it'll challenge EU subsidy regimes where they harm UK producers.\n\nHarmonised standards reduce trade friction and create a level playing field, deviation creates barriers. The EU wants to avoid barriers as the UK is a pretty lucrative export market which it about to lose preferential access to after all.", "631" ], [ "> That's a unique and bizarre take.\n\nIt's neither unique, nor bizarre...\n\n > LPF is a lower limit, and does not prevent higher standards.\n\nA level playing field can mean any number of things, the WTO includes LPF provisions, the UK/Japan agreement does, it can range from very little through non-regression out to something else (like joint bodies etc..).\n\nThe IFS addresses that in their discussion of the political declaration - ([see here](_URL_0_)), that highlights that the EU was looking for “dynamic alignment”, and that it was indeed something that <PERSON> had considered, but that the government took a position was closer to “non-regression”.\n\n > If unilateral standards create new trade barriers, such as between the EU and USA, there are ways to resolve that by adjudication.\n\nThe US and EU trade on WTO terms, the US and EU both have any number of non-tariff barriers to trade and the EU and US have both added to those over the years, the US sees real issues around EU approaches in a whole slew of areas. They are also not generally resolved by adjudication absent an agreement (and the WTO would be included in that to some extent).", "631" ], [ "> So with PoE APs I'd need to wire ethernet each AP?\n\nYes, but the benefit is that they get both power and network connectivity from the same cable (you'll need a PoE capable switch or injectors..) which reduces your cabling requirements and can keep things nice and neat.\n\n > Two or three in a house my size would work I think. \n\nYup, I'd assume two, but it depends on the house, three should absolutely cover you.\n\n > If you go that route do you need a server or other hardware? Hope it doesnt get too expensive or cumbersome ...\n\nNope, it should be simpler than a mesh. You'd need a PoE switch (or injectors) if you are going for power over ethernet, but the AP's essentially just act as gateways to your network in the same way that a Mesh would, but without them needing to create a complete wireless network to transfer traffic..\n\nNot sure that's really clear, but... \n\n & #x200B;\n\n", "551" ], [ "The relative value is important too don't you think? Either way, total EU exports in 2019 amounted to around £4,741bn, the UK was the EU's 2nd largest export market, with £374bn exports from the EU to the UK. That's closer to 8% of the EU's exports, and worth more in absolute terms.\n\nSo in terms of EU trade, the UK is more important than every other EU trade partner bar the US and China, and the UK buys significantly more from the EU than China does.\n\nI'd say that the EU absolutely does care about UK market access. I mean if the UK and EU don't have an FTA, that'll leave the EU with no FTA with it's three largest trading partners and a big chunk of its trade.", "631" ], [ "> This is where the prosciutto makers and BMW come to the rescue of Brexit, right? \n\nI doubt it, although I'd assume that both car makers and agricultural producers will be unhappy if there is no UK/EU FTA as it does hit them disproportionately to other industries. At the end of the day the EU is doing to make a decision based on its wider interests though.\n\n > The EU is not going to compromise the single market\n\nNo, of course not. Why would it? A UK/EU FTA with non-regression wouldn't compromise the single market though would it?\n\n > for a country run by Britain <PERSON> right-wingers \n\nThe conservatives in the UK are about as far right as the Germans or the French, quite a lot of EU member states are vastly further to the right than the UK is.. And as an aside, <PERSON> isn't close to <PERSON> in any sense, certainly not politically or ideologically..\n\n > who are just rearing to deregulate just for 8% of their trade.\n\nThe UK isn't about to deregulate significantly either, it'd be practically and politically impossible to do so at this point. And again, the UK would agree to non-regression, so that's not an issue that the EU has to address either way.", "631" ], [ "> Exactly why? \n\nThe UK could have reduced workers rights in the EU further than it did, it didn't because it's politically unpopular, even things like like parental leave and minimum wage provisions, notice periods and pensions etc.. which the UK could have binned haven't been touched. There are some areas where there might be some tweaking, but there is very little economic benefit from a shift, and a lot of political and economic risk to one.\n\n > Workers right would actually be a pretty good target, since it does not affect product standards.\n\nWorkers rights also provide a benefit to the UK generally, and reduce government costs. The last thing the government wants is a major push back toward Labour unions and issues with employers. Oh and obviously the UK will still need to attract people from abroad (perhaps even moreso), including skilled workers, poor working conditions or the perception that they are dropping tends to push against that.\n\nThat said, it's possible, but the reaction to it would be predictable. It'd be the fastest way to get a Labour government in 2024 (And then more solid workers rights than the current set).", "631" ], [ "Your first point to me at least was that there were no tangible benefits, there are (we've gone over them). My point above is that it's very unlikely that workers rights drop, moreover, you'll remember that Lord <PERSON> (chairman of the Remain Campaign at the time) made the point that one of the risks of the UK leaving the EU would be higher wages for low skilled workers, so if he's right about that it'd seem that workers voted with their interests even when it came to pay.\n\nPeople voted based on their interests and their priorities in any case..", "564" ], [ "> When no-deal hits us, the Tories tank. Food shortages on shelves, mass layoffs in the tens of thousands, riots in all major cities. They hit the mid to low 20s in polling. People argue that it's guaranteed that Labour wins a majority come 2024.\n\nYou do realise that when you set the bar that low (so low that even no-deal will hurdle it relatively easily based on the current projections.) you create a situation where people are expecting a massive catastrophe, but when it turns out to be relatively minor in comparison, they then get to claim a success were there was in fact a failure (and no-deal would be a failure of government..).", "365" ], [ "Now you are conflating a reduction in bureaucracy with deregulation...\n\nIndeed that linked article isn't about dropping standards, or binning regulation is it? The EU is unwieldy in quite a few areas, the UK for all its faults has become a lot better in the last decade in terms of finding more efficient ways to achieve things, especially with digital services. We have got issues with the amount of layered crap around EU funding, CAP, the approaches it takes on gold plated regulation on novel business... That's not the same thing as slashing workers rights or outright deregulation though is it?\n\nYou appear to be reading everything through the prism on an expected outcome and ignoring everything else.\n\nAnd even if the Tories were to take that approach, the next government could and likely would reverse it.. The nice thing about these things being UK competencies now, the whole point in fact, was that it is down to UK governments and if Brexit has shown us anything, its that people can force UK governments to change if they don't like what they are doing.", "631" ], [ "> Sorry, economically distressed countries do not up their standards.\n\nLuckily the UK is not economically distressed to any significant degree then isn't it? And of course the EU is facing a slew of economic challenges too, are we expecting them to reduce standards again (they did after the Greek crisis..).\n\n > When we are competing with Singapore and Vietnam, our workers are not going to get longer maternity leave and shorter hours.\n\nWe aren't going to be competing with Singapore and Vietnam though are we? Our economies are very different, it's one of the reasons why trading with them is a good idea, we have a lot of areas where trade is complimentary. \n\nAnd as to maternity leave, they'll have longer periods available than most in EU countries, and I can't see hours worked suddenly being pushed up massively either.", "841" ], [ "> We are in recession to be worsened by Brexit. Yes, we are economically distressed.\n\nWe are not in a recession... The UK has just had a quarter of growth. In terms of COVID, pretty much every economy has taken an economic hit and there projections are a recovery (and as an aside, the impact of brexit is now projected to be slower growth not further decline in any case).\n\n > Which is why we lost those Dyson jobs to Singapore and crab packing jobs to Vietnam, right.\n\nWe lost those to those countries exactly because we can't and won't compete on labour or tax..\n\n > Which bring some back again to my point - the new Blue Wall voters are competing against Singapore and Vietnam.\n\nThat's not accurate at all..\n\n > Regarding EU reducing standards - they can only raise our standards, not lower them.\n\nAnd that's not true either. The EU can change standards however they want, the EU has required member states to reduce protections in the past and can do so if they sit within the EU's competencies. There is no requirement for the EU to only raise standards.. Where are you getting the idea that that's the case?", "631" ], [ "> But now we have sovereignty. Singapore on Thames does not mean tea time.\n\nWe can't compete on labour or tax either way, its politically impossible and economically negative, it doesn't provide a benefit... If you want to make an argument about the Tories being anti-worker, then the concern is offshoring existing work (which has already largely been done...), cheap labour and production in the UK hasn't been a thing since <PERSON>, it's not coming back, the UK has too low a level of unemployment, issues around resource and all the rest of it.\n\nIt's not a thing. Even things like financial deregulation don't make a lot of sense for the UK as one of the reasons the UK does well is because it has a good reputation, a solid legal basis and good regulation (so people are confident about using the UK). The EU is catching up with that (as member states catch up to the EU in implementing EU directives and as the EU takes enforcement action to push it) but hey.", "631" ], [ "> God damn dude. Nobody wants to read through 10 paragraphs and have a 5 hour debate about with you about this. Debating this is now futile, the damage is done.\n\nAh shite, sorry mate. I thought we were on a message board for discussing this, and that I'd responded to a comment of your, discussing this...\n\n > I get that you feel butthurt about my dismissive attitude towards this agreement but I just don't give a fuck.\n\nThat's grand, although I'm not hurt about your attitude, I'm simply posting my view (again, message board for discussion and all).", "248" ], [ "> Non AI autopilots have been flying planes for decades and AI recently demonstrated that it could take human opponents and shoot them down with a 100% success rate.\n\nThat seems pretty unlikely, do you have a source? Things like well integrated AD systems with SAM's aren't generally 100% capable of shooting down an manned fighter and that's effectively with an unmanned kill vehicle that only has one job, doesn't need to care about target discrimination to a large extent and where you can put a large number of them into the air relatively rapidly, in an environment where you have a vast number of sensors and various command and control options. Most of the jobs that fighters are used for are a lot more complex than that (and obviously there are a lot of other jobs that manned aircraft do..) and I haven't seen anything that comes close to meeting the claim from above.\n\nAnd yes, aircraft (including things like cruise missiles and both target drones and the more normal UAV) have been flown without a human pilot for a long time and that part tends to work well, it's the decision making and dealing with any sort of adverse issue or edge case (never mind damage etc..) that tends to create issues that, as far as I am aware are nowhere near being solved. Never mind target identification and autonomous intercept.", "917" ], [ "That's not close to being the same thing, it's an AI pilot in an entirely simulated environment (not something running on an aircraft..) and with the neural net 'learning' a very specific task on a trial and error basis. It's what any final autonomous system will come out of but it's not an AI pilot beating a pilot as such, it's closer to the AI that you'd get in a flight combat game than anything else. Mating up the 'flying the plane' and the 'fighting the plane' using kit just in the plane, and just the sensors on the plane will be a huge step (think Tesla autopilot vs an AI car in a computer game...).", "917" ], [ "How are you 'accessing it by the router' at the moment? If you have a phone jack (some ISP routers would simply have a phone jack that you could connect any normal phone too to access the provided VOIP line, and you can buy dedicated kit if not..) you can almost certainly simply use it in the same way as any other phone jack. If they've given you a way to access a VOIP service, then you'll need some hardware that manages the voip connection and gives you a standard line to plug in to. If they've provided you with a standalone VOIP phone then it'll depend on whether they allow you to use your own kit.", "551" ], [ "You realise that an autopilot on a commercial aircraft (well, the most modern ones anyway) essentially follows a set of pre-programmed instructions around altitude speed and bearing to go on a known route and depend on ground systems for landing (And are generally not used for takeoff..)? On older aircraft they amount to a system to maintain a bearing and altitude.\n\nThat's fine for an airliner with a specified start end end point, it doesn't really get you very far, it's arguably less complex than the 'autopilot' on a Tesla (which has to contend with lanes, other traffic etc..). You'd actually be better off using the fly by wire in any modern military aircraft, as that does most of the work of keeping the aircraft flying anyway.\n\nWhat autopilots in commercial aircraft don't do is make decisions about where to go, they hand off to pilots when conditions become problematic or there are unexpected conditions.. They are a very long way away from replacing a pilot except for routine, pre-planned, operations within a fairly narrow set of tolerances. \n\nAn autonomous fighter is a lot more than an autopilot..", "863" ], [ "> On one hand there’s autopilot who has proved to fly planes safely for over a century, \n\nYes.. Although for most of that time 'fly safely' meant fly straight and level.\n\n > on the other there’s AI that has proven good enough to beat human pilots and algorithms have flown combat missions and made on the spot decisions.\n\nNo, there is AI that, in certain controlled circumstances, using ground based equipment and computers, can beat a human pilot.\n\n > You’re weirdly attached to a WWII vision of the RAF that is outdated and obsolete.\n\nNot at all, automation is absolutely the way forward, but we are nowhere near that being viable yet, certainly not in the context of an adversary with even rudamentary EW capabilities or the ability to degrade communications. It's not a thing yet, it might well be in 25 years, and there are a lot of people working towards it, but it's not there yet and not really all that close.", "917" ], [ "It doesn't as such (and it largely amends other legislation, but hey). However the Bill does require that any activity authorised and so carried out by undercover food standards agency agents (or anyone else..) has to be compliant with the Human Rights Act and indeed the European Convention on Human Rights, so that means that torture, murder and sexual violence would all not be things that can be authorised. \n\nI don't see any reason why that can't be explicitly repeated in the legislation (and would prefer it were frankly..) but even absent that, it is still limited. The legislation could and should be better, but something like it is needed as it brings oversight that is currently missing, it brings a legally enforceable protection that currently doesn't exist and it means that undercover agent can't be authorised to commit crimes that breach the HRA or the ECHR, and that would stand up in court.\n\nSo unless you can come up with a scenario where it would be even slightly reasonable to authorize an undercover food standards agent to commit a sexual offence (or more specifically rape someone) without breaching the HRA or ECHR I'm not sure how you think it authorises it... \n\nOr to put it another way, there are a lot of reasons why this legislation isn't great, there are a lot of things that could be done better, but we need something like it, and making daft arguments that don't stand up to scrutiny (like yours in this thread) aren't helpful and detract from the actual arguments.", "903" ], [ "> I mean, EU FOM goes both ways for starters.\n\nAbsolutely (although people in the UK have been pretty bad at making use of it, which I think is at least in part because of the poor state of language teaching and the lack of focus on it in the UK..). \n\n > I'm not saying that's 100% not the case, but in my case it's definitely vindictive pleasure at things coming crashing down for Brexiteers. It's pretty satisfying to see something that you warned someone over and over again not to do because they wouldn't like the result actually do exactly what you warned them it would while they laughed in your face.\n\nAnd I think the issue with that is that for most it's not about race, for the anti-migration lot I don't think they care whether it's someone from India, China or Pakistan, they'll be unhappy at there being migrants at all. \n\nMy point is more that the notion from some remainers that they 'warned' leavers that more non-white migrants might arrive, as though that is somehow obviously a bad thing seems to suggest more of an issue with those making the statement than anything else. From a personal perspective, I think the loss of FoM is probably the biggest negative of leaving, but if it results in an uptick in migration from elsewhere then that balances things a little.", "564" ], [ "> I always took it as 'warning' people about something they knew they didn't like - or at least pointing out the faulty logic in Leave arguments. Leave arguments based on kicking out 'the muslims' ...so leaving the EU were always peak stupidity, and the 'warning' was just drawing attention to that.\n\nOh I completely get the logic, but it feels like someone stuck in their own bubble with a weird caricature of half the population, who only got the leave arguments from the most remainery of remainy blogs.. There were no doubt some leavers who thought that Brexit would mean the 'forrins' would get kicked out, but they were a tiny minority. Muslims being kicked out certainly wasn't an argument being made by anyone semi-rational, it wasn't even made by the Kippers. Even EU nationals being kicked out wasn't an argument that was made (because rightly it'd have turned rather a lot of leave voters off and obviously isn't a thing..). \n\n > ...so leaving the EU were always peak stupidity, and the 'warning' was just drawing attention to that.\n\nExcept you really aren't, all you are really doing is pushing the 'leavers are all racists' thing in a way that makes it seem (at least to me..) that you are the one with the problem with Muslims and non-white European foreigners.\n\nBecause again, I only really see this narriative in the wild from remainers..", "564" ], [ "> Surely that should've been before the referendum. \n\nNot really, the EU referendum was rightly binary, it's a question of governance and self determination, it needed to be narrow. \n\nIt'd be like asking whether the UK should switch to PR, obviously people would vote for that for a variety of reasons, you wouldn't bundle it with the question of who should be in government after.\n\nThe leave campaign, like the remain campaign, campaigned on what was and what was not possible in (or out..) of the EU, and the leave arguments were pretty clear that the idea was to take competencies back from the EU and have UK governments make use of them.. \n\n > We don't have an election for or against the government where, if we vote against, there is a \"period of discussion\" amongst a small number of people about what happens. There should've been a precise and achievable plan for what would happen next.\n\nNo, because when we vote in a GE we are voting for an MP, while looking at broad party manifestos. In the EU referendum we were asked whether the UK should be a member of the EU or not, not what the UK should do if it left..", "564" ], [ "> Then you could have had a 2nd referendum on the details, but that part was skipped since a representative democracy can ignore the will of the people entirely.\n\nArguably the bigger issue there was that it got bundled in with the remain vs leave thing. A second referendum offering a variety of exit approaches would have been fine, but obviously if you have a variety of exit approaches and 'remain' then all you get is a perverse outcome with the 'leave' block split across a variety of options and the 'remain' grouping concentrated in one. \n\nOh and it also really didn't help that MP's basically came out and said that they'd still not shift their position after a second referendum (so in terms of the parliamentary deadlock, and actually moving forward pre-WA it was a political mess either way).", "564" ], [ "> The problem is there are a discrete number of options and we've ruled out all of them as being preferable.\n\nAre there? I must have missed that discussion.\n\n > Hence the internal market bill attempting to create an extra option (though it doesn't really) for another longer period so we can stare dumbfounded at our options for longer before we decide to not make a choice again.\n\nThe IMB was designed (poorly..) to counter the EU pissing about with the N.I. protocol to the point where the agreed situation (N.I. being part of the UK's internal market and customs union..) would not come about, and the entire mechanism for assessing the risk of goods entering the SM was to be sidestepped with a blanket 'all goods' being used. I mean it was technically clever from the EU side, but the reaction was never going to be the UK agreeing to it..", "631" ], [ "> That's strange, because it's literally in the withdrawal agreement that the UK signed.\n\nAs is the mechanism to assess goods via the JC (well, it's in the N.I. protocol) and the declaration that N.I. will be in the UK customs union and internal market.. The point is that the UK and EU agreed to a compromise that worked for both sides, the EU decided to use that as leverage and broke the compromise. The response was pretty predictable.\n\n > When you're dealing with a trade border you have to have your checks somewhere. The options are:\n\nSure, and again, Northern Ireland is, as per the N.I. protocol, part of the UK market, and part of the UK's customs area. The compromise was that it would also effectively be part of the SM, and that the EU and UK would work together to ensure that that wasn't abused (by identifying at risk goods). It's not a great outcome, but it's a compromise. It would have meant minimal checks on goods entering N,I, an open border with Ireland and something that could be built on with an FTA. The EU then decided that they would simply not use the mechanism to assess risk and all goods entering N.I would be deemed at risk....\n\n > IMB was a desperate attempt to try to have options 1 and 2 at the same time and pretend that it doesn't undermine either the UK trade border or the EU trade border.\n\nIMB formalises what was agreed in the N.I protocol about the position of N.I. while potentially breaching the agreement that at risk goods would be managed sensibly. It's a counter to the notion that all goods are at risk.", "631" ], [ "> Ah, the old \"forget your principles and beliefs, and switch to campaigning/working towards something you honestly believe will be detremental to the country\" argument.\n\nThat's not my argument, and I've said it again and again, it's entirely reasonable for remain supporters to have kept pushing for remain, but that came with a cost as it wasn't successful.\n\n > It never ceases to amaze me how many people actually think this is reasonable.\n\nSurely it is reasonable to point out that by not moving on to the 'how we leave' from 'should we leave' after the referendum, and as it became clear that popular opinion wasn't shifting significantly, created a situation where those looking for a more distant relationship faced less opposition than they should have. It left us in a position where people who wanted to leave the EU but keep a close relationship, but did want to leave could get no support from former remainers, and so looked instead to support those who wanted a 'cleaner' break, because it at least ensured the exit..", "564" ], [ "> Your turn, please provide links to it not being a disaster.\n\nYou realise those links don't support the claim right? Either way, if we are just listing things that we think are good then:\n\nThe competencies that the UK devolved to the UK start to return:\n\n[_URL_6_](_URL_6_)\n\nThe UK government uses those to make VAT changes:\n\n[_URL_2_](_URL_2_)\n\nAnd enter into trade agreements outside of the EU:\n\n[_URL_3_](_URL_3_)\n\nAnd address issues around marine protections:\n\n[_URL_1_](_URL_1_)\n\nAnd addresses animal welfare issues:\n\n[_URL_5_](_URL_5_)\n\nIn a number of areas:\n\n[_URL_0_](_URL_0_)\n\nAnd acts independently of the EU given the EU can't act:\n\n[_URL_4_](_URL_4_)", "631" ], [ "> We could issue sanctions before,\n\nSure, the pound has also fallen in the past, and jobs have left the city, oh and the UK hasn't broken up and the supply of goods won't be threatened if there is an FTA.. . In this instance however the UK seems to have explicitly decided to ditch the EU as it was taking too long, something that's easier to do if you are not part of the group.\n\n > and ban fur sales,\n\nProbably not, we could (and did..) ban production, but as with fois gras, banning the sale of goods that are generally allowed to be sold in the single market is creating a market barrier. We could have asked permission to do so, but any member state with an interest in selling fur in the UK could have objected.\n\n > the vat changes were coming anyhow so this is just a slightly faster.\n\nThe VAT changes may or may not have been coming, now they are part of the UK's normal political process and can be managed as appropriately, up to and including binning VAT for something less regressive.\n\n > Our record on getting good trade agreements is a little rocky so far, but its early days so the jury is out on that one\n\nTrue, although you could argue that the EU's record on getting decent trade agreements with its largest trading partner is pretty shit, so if the UK lands an EU FTA it's doing better than the EU has been for a while.\n\nEither way, this is me listing things I like, and the parent listing things that they don't like, it comes down to the fact that I don't want the UK in the EU and they do. Leaving the EU isn't a disaster, it does have costs and benefits, if you value the costs more highly, you'll see it as a negative if not, then on balance you wont..", "631" ], [ "> The UK losing well paying jobs in it's main industry,\n\nFinancial services isn't the UK's 'main industry', and 7500 jobs is a lot, but there is vastly more fluctuation than that annually anyway. The UK's financial services have strengthened relative to the EU's over the period..\n\n > reduction in quality of life from reduced access to food and medication, \n\nThere has not been a reduction in access to food and medication, if the UK and EU put in place an FTA that's not happening, if the UK and EU don't, there may be some disruption, but again, the prospect of medium or even long term harm is pretty much nil.\n\n > the end of the nation with country splitting up, \n\nExcept the UK hasn't split up..\n\n > international markets showing a poor outlook in UK industry causing the £ to fall \n\nSure, those are negatives that will not go away until the UK and EU sign on to a deal (or not), it is driven by uncertainty.\n\n > and a complete destruction of the UK's standing on the international scale by showing we're not to be trusted in deals doesn't support that brexit is a disaster?\n\nWell that hasn't happened at all so.. No?\n\n > First link, what competencies? there is nothing in the article apart from a new 50p (now worth 40p) and removing flags.\n\nSeriously? You aren't aware that the UK had to devolve power to the EU as part of its membership, and that they are now returned to the UK? \n\n > 2nd link, if it wasn't for the referendum the EU would have done it anyway\n\nExcept we've been trying to do it for year and the EU keep shifting away from it.. We couldn't have done it, we might have been able to do it if we asked the EU nicely and they agreed, and maybe they were going to look at it again in 2022.. Now we can simply, you know, do it.\n\n > 3rd link, none of those deals will be as valuable as free trade with the EU or the deals the EU could negotiate.\n\nOf course they will be, and they won't have to take into account the protections that 27 other EU member states need. Indeed UK FTA's could be significantly more valuable, put in place more rapidly and leave the UK looking at more well tailored agreements.\n\n > 4th link, \"has given the strongest hint yet \" so not even a declaration of intent, just a hint, most of the supertrawlers came about because of how the UK sold off the fishing rights anyway against the advice of the EU\n\nAs an EU member, the UK couldn't protect the Marine Protected Areas it had designated, now it can...\n\n > 5th + 6th link, \"A spokeswoman for Defra said: “We have some of the highest welfare standards in the world, and that is both a source of pride and a clear reflection of UK attitudes towards animals.\" and yet they want to bring back fox hunting and refuse to set into law animal welfare standards for food, a bit hypocritical,\n\nNot hypocritical at all, and I don't think Defra want to bring back fox hunting, and animal welfare standards for food are not at risk either, indeed the government has repeatedly said it'll protect and expand them.\n\n > last link, it's a pity we have trashed our international reputation so much recently or else someone might have taken notice.\n\nOdd that we were able to act in concert with international partners, and actually put in sanctions that matter and have an impact, but the EU weren't though right?", "631" ], [ "> You still think that autopilots only fly planes “straight and level” and apparently you’ve never heard of this DARPA experiment which is arguably the biggest landmark in combat aviation this decade, so I’m going to doubt your overall understanding of the subject. \n\nAre you having issues with reading comprehension?\n\n > And if a UAV has ever been hacked or rendered inoperable by Electronic Warfare please provide your source.\n\nFirstly it wouldn't matter if there hadn't been, it's still a massive risk, but in any case the Iran RQ-17 take down would seem to be one fairly public example.", "863" ], [ "Fuck knows, probably because <PERSON> is a tit? Although it's probably worth pointing out that he wasn't part of the official leave campaign, he was roundly criticised for that poster (rightly..) and the feeling was that it reduced support.. If it was such a driving issue for leave voters, why didn't the actual leave campaign push that notion?\n\nAh, that's right, because it's at best a fringe position. It'd be like claiming all remainers are fascists because the 'friends of <PERSON>' are remainers or suggesting that the 'white Europe' pro-EU types are some how representative of UK pro-EU people..", "564" ], [ "Erm...\n\n > <PERSON> negotiated the Best of Both World’s deal in 2016, allowing for participation in the EU institutions we want to remain a part of.\n\nThat really depends on how you look at what he came back with, for the remain side it probably was as close to a best of both worlds position (kills further integration, some move to protect the UK's interests etc..). Probably not if you had issues with the EU as it is now.\n\n > This deal was rejected by the UK public in the 2016 referendum.\n\nIt was, although 'remain and reform' was probably the most attractive argument that came out of the remain campaign. \n\n > The next 4 years have been spent renegotiating a new arrangement, which if accepted would be consistent with Best of Both Worlds.\n\nThe WA and FTA negotiations have been negotiating a rather different outcome to Camerons renegotiations, again, I'd agree that some might see it as the best possible compromise if you take the PD as a guide (So open trade, no political union, no FoM, but a relatively close relationship..). I'm not sure that anyone on the remain side would see that as the best of both worlds though.\n\n > The outcome of a leave majority is indistinguishable from what in 2016 was proposed as the outcome of a remain majority.\n\nNo, it's about as different as it gets, the UK is out of the EU, outside of the political union, outside the economic union and single market, the competencies handed off to the EU return to the UK.. It's not close to what <PERSON> negotiated..\n\n > Defence and security isn’t even on the negotiating table, so continued participation in an integrated EU defence is all but assumed.\n\nQuite the reverse, the UK wasn't involved in PESCO and will sit outside of the CSDP. The UK's contribution to European defence will be bilateral (the existing French/German etc. agreements) and through NATO. Intelligence sharing and so on will be on a very different footing indeed. In terms of defence and security the UK's interests haven't changed so I can't see their position on defence within Europe and the EU changing, but the prospect of being dragged into some sort of EU wide defence mechanism is pretty dead (not that it was very alive before).", "631" ], [ "> The concessions now being discussed are in order to maintain access to the single market right?\n\nAccess to, not membership of, sure. And only in a fairly limited way (the four freedoms being reduced to one, and not in an absolute sense..). \n\n > And as the WA transposed all existing EU regulations onto UK statutes, I find it hard to see the significant differences.\n\nThe difference is that the EU can no longer legislate for the UK, nor cause the UK to legislate, the UK can modify existing transposed legislation (or repeal it..), the UK is no longer part of EU trade agreements and can manage its own etc.. It's a vastly different outcome constitutionally, politically and practically..\n\n > Regarding defence, it’s only in the UK there’s any denial of the looming federalised military arrangement as it would be untenable to the electorate, but is made quite explicit on the continent - both in the media and EU policy discussions. \n\nRight.. And that's a matter for the EU and EU member states. If they want to integrate their armed forces at some point in the future then there isn't a lot the UK can do within the EU or outside of it. It could only limit its own involvement and possibly create some barriers to using some of the existing EU framework while in the EU.\n\n > We’re still participating in PESCO albeit as a 3rd party state, the door to furthering this relationship in future is by no means closed.\n\nWe didn't participate in PESCO as an EU member, and won't continue to participate in the CSDP. The UK's interests appear to be around ensuring that UK companies can bid for EU (EDF/whatever) contracts more than any particular intention to participate in EU military operations, not least because half the EU ones seem to mirror NATO ones anyway.", "631" ], [ "> the concessions for access to the single market will involve continued regulatory alignment, will it not? \n\nThat doesn't seem to be the case no, the position currently is non-regression on the UK side (as with the Japan FTA as it happens) which seems sensible given the UK meets and exceeds the EU baselines anyway and there isn't exactly a lot of demand to regress. That also protects the UK if the EU starts to shift its regulatory direction, or EU members undercut EU minimums.. \n\n > Therefore Brussels will still be legislating for the UK.\n\nThat'd be the case if the EU's initial position of dynamic alignment were agreed, but it's not likely, we'll see no-deal before that (and rightly so in context).\n\n > I agree EU defence is a matter for the EU, if UK armed forces decision making isn’t subordinate to Brussels then no problem, but UK defence industry are unlikely to be able to bid for contracts without participation/subordination.\n\nWhy wouldn't the UK defence industry be able to bid for contracts without participation or subordination? The UK currently sells to the US and others, the EU wants to continue to be able to sell to the UK and others, they are more likely to put in place a framework for 3rd party procurement..", "631" ], [ "> at the very least, regardless of the nuances of the deal, UK politicians can no longer play the “... but Brussels” card without admitting to their own inadequacies in fulfilling the wishes of the public.\n\nAbsolutely, the big win is that this pushes all these issues into the domestic political discourse, our elected MP's are responsible, and can be held accountable in a way that MEP's and the EU in general couldn't be when we were a member of the EU.", "631" ], [ "> Look at countries in Asia. Look at Germany. Look at the US.\n\nGermany narrowly avoided a recession before COVID, if you look at GDP growth in Europe, the UK [isn't exactly an outlier](_URL_0_) and even the mid-term growth predictions are more than reasonable (although messy given COVID), the UK was and has been growing not shrinking (again, up until the Covid lock downs, and obviously is in recovery from that..). When it comes to Asia, sure, lots of countries have seen massive growth a they have shifted from being developing countries to more developed, that's to be expected (you see the same with more recent EU members, or any country with low output..). \n\n > Business wise...I dont have too much hope for this country.\n\nGrand, but you don't seem to be basing it on any meaningful data. The UK may, with a poor brexit outcome, see slower growth than it might otherwise have done, long term it depends on what the government does with the competencies that have been returned to the UK. Some businesses will do well, others won't, but the UK is and will remain one of the richest countries in the world, it will continue to grow, it will continue to develop, and living standards will almost certainly continue to rise (after having stalled somewhat).\n\nAny number of things (Covid, <PERSON>, The current Government, <PERSON>, any unexpected drama moving forward..) could have an impact on the UK economy, but you have to be wilfully blind to think that the UK is regressing or that it doesn't have the potential to progress.", "841" ], [ "> well from what I've read the bill is trying to make it so that British military personnel cannot be prosecuted from war crimes committed overseas after 5 years have passed. Would that not effectively reduce the hold the Geneva Convention has on our military?\n\nNo, firstly because it doesn't make it so that military personnel cannot be prosecuted for war crims after 5 years, and secondly because the Geneva Convention (at least in context) applies to conduct during a conflict anyway. If troops are breaching the Geneva Conventions to commit war crimes then it doesn't really matter whether they are prosecuted or not, the breach has already occured.\n\n > War crimes are already hard to prosecute for, and many atrocities only come to light well after they've been committed (since victims in war zones aren't normally in any kind of position to contact the courts) - I don't see how adding a new, incredible quick statute of limitations will not make that worse.\n\nThere is no statute of limitations on war crimes under UK law, with this legislation or otherwise. And yes, crimes that occured a long time are hard to prosecute unless there is really good evidence to support them, this doesn't change that either, arguably that's what it is taking into account because at present, a crime from 5 years ago, that happened overseas, potentially with very little evidence available would lead to a prosecution, under this legislation it would no longer automatically lead to a prosecution (but if there were good evidence that a crime occured, it would still be prosecuted). Its in response to a large number of cases that turned out to be false being brought against UK forces, with all the issues that creates..", "733" ], [ "> If a british soldier kills your family and nothing happens to them, do you think you would treat the next british soldier you meet fairly?\n\nI'm not sure how that's relevant. Emotionally I'd want them dead, but I'm also pretty glad that I don't have a say in that. If we remove the emotional aspect, I'd want it to be investigated, the soldier charged and prosecuted and, if they broke the law, found guilty and jailed. This legislation doesn't stop any of that though does it?", "528" ], [ "> This bill will not prevent prosecution, that is true, but I'm done some more reading and it will raise the bar for enacting a prosecution after 5 years.\n\nWhich is fairly reasonable, you want a really low bar during a conflict, but it is not unreasonable to suggest that 5 years after the fact, when it becomes incredibly hard to investigate the bar is a tad higher because the prosecution itself has a massive impact on the target of those prosecutions and the ability of the armed forces to act (reputationally etc..), cost a lot and take a lot of time. \n\n > I will admit I was wrong about the exact specifics, but my main point does not change and I do not think you have addressed it - the Geneva Convention only really matters if it is enforced. \n\nBut again, it is. The UK armed forces place an enormous foruc on that in training and operationally. If you report an incident it gets taken seriously and acted on (in terms of abuses by soldiers, the issues tend to be around a lack of reporting...).\n\n > War crimes only really matter if war criminals are actually punished. This Bill does make it easier to get away with war crimes, simply because it makes prosecuting after 5 years have passed harder - it's not a Statute of Limitations (I was wrong about that), but that doesn't change the fact that many victims of war crimes are going to take longer than 5 years to get their voices heard. \n\nIt also makes it harder for people to pursue false claims that, just by existing, impact soldiers, the country and real victims.\n\n > That is what is meant when we say this bill affects Britain's relationship with the Geneva Convention - Britain has an obligation to bring war criminals, alleged or otherwise, to trial. Any Bill that affects that obligation absolutely does affect our relationship with the Convention.\n\nIt does not as the UK will still conduct itself in line with the Geneva Conventions and act where there is evidence that soldiers broke the law.", "24" ], [ "Looking at the wiki page on the subject, the suggestion is that SIM locks are not illegal or banned, but that the carrier has to inform the consumer that the phone will be sim locked, and that the carrier must unlock phones on demand. That's pretty much the current situation in the UK (and as in Brazil, many phone carriers don't lock phones in the first place in the UK), this new set of regulation would however ban locking outright, rather than leaving it up to the carriers and mandating that carriers unlock phones.\n\nObviously it's entirely possible the wikipedia entry is wrong, but it sounds like Brazil has largely functionally binned phone locking, but not actually banned it.", "574" ], [ "Sure, and again, in the UK you could get your phone unlocked (carriers were required to do so if asked), your number is portable and so on, but carriers could still sell locked phones (And did, which meant you had really cheap PAYG phones for a bit as people were tied into networks...). Quite a few UK carriers didn't lock phones either, but it wasn't banned. Now the UK is banning the sale of locked phones outright. Brazil appears to still allow the sale of locked phones (but carriers have to unlock them) although phones in Brazil seem to be largely sold unlocked anyway.", "927" ], [ "It's travel insurance, even if you are 80 you can generally pick up travel insurance for the US or anywhere else in the world for relatively small amounts (although it does taper with age, anything up to £100 or so) with relatively comprehensive cover and little/no out of pocket expenses. That's in part because it isn't 'normal' health cover, they aren't going to be covering long term treatment etc.. but largely emergency care and potentially repatriation.", "42" ], [ "> We now have 4 superpowers\n\nNot really, we have one superpower (the US is really the only country that can claim that title..). Russia is a major military power to an extent, but it's basically leaning on its nuclear weapons at this point, the same is largely true for China, except it's leaning on its economic weight more than its military capability. After that you have a slew of major regional powers/great powers(Japan, Germany, the UK, France, possibly India at some point etc..) that have varying strengths..\n\nI don't think that the UK was ever going to recapture the position it held before WWI though.", "753" ], [ "The system is generally important as it creates different outcomes in terms of proportionality. You also have to address the whole geographic link element (you may well find it hard to have MP's who represent constituents and a proportional result for example). PR systems tend to require lots of modifiers to prevent unintended or problematic outcomes, you'll find things like thresholds (that a party has to get more than 5% of the vote to get any seats for example), or different classes of MP's (constituency MP's and those elected on party top up lists say). \n\nEssentially its easy to agree that elections should yield legislatures that match, broadly proportionately, the votes cast in elections, but that doesn't necessarily lead to better representation, or even (depending on the system...) governments that actually represent public demand or voting intention either. It also tends to transfer a lot of power to party infrastructure (in a way that the UK system currently doesn't) with at least some legislators being even more beholden to the party that got them elected than to a given electorate.\n\nBut yeah, the UK needs to see some reform.", "207" ], [ "> Which, again, when pitted against FPTP, is a meaningful enough distinction.\n\nSomewhat, you can have FPTP with top ups getting you both FPTP and a PR outcome, and FPTP can have outcomes that are as proportional as PR systems (when those PR systems include other measures, which they usually do, like thresholds). But yeah, I'd use it as the distinction.\n\n > That's neither here nor there to your original point that PR is too vague, which is what I was responding to.\n\nPR is too vague as there are way too many approaches with different outcomes and there are quite a few PR approaches that I'd see as worse than FPTP all in (And that others would likely too). I suppose my issue with this sort of question is that there are very few people who oppose election systems that are proportional, but that it fails to address what people actually want from an electoral system (a ranked poll of what people want from their democracy would be incredibly interesting though..).", "207" ], [ "> I'm guessing there is a large overlap with the people now protesting against Face masks, against Free school meals and against the BBC.\n\nProbably not a huge one, the mask protesters are a tiny minority (as are the anti-5G lot) and they seem to include a bizarre combination of people from the fringes of the political spectrum. The anti school meal people seem to be either Tories or libertarians and the anti-BBC contingent seem to include a really large number of people who want to see the BBC shut down/defunded because they blame it for Brexit and giving UKIP/Farage too much air time.\n\nAnecdotally (although I think it's also reflected in the polling.) most leave supporters I know seem to want the Government to put in place a sensible FTA with the EU and think that the Government haven't done a great job so far in negotiations. Even the no-deal set within the brexit camp is a fairly small minority (Well the, 'let's aim for a no-deal' lot anyway, as distinct from the 'no-deal would be a shit outcome, but better than some sort of BINO mess' lot.", "564" ], [ "Ah yeah, if they are covering cancellation it might get expensive (although the last travel cover I picked up included something like £5k cancellation and half that for abandonment due to delay and £1k if you miss a flight, so it still seems pretty extreme..). \n\nJust for context, my European car cover (at £60..) covered the repatriation of a car, flew 5 people back to the UK and provided a hire car for me and a pet to drive back to the UK (from France..) and then paid to replace 2x tyres on the car (although the latter was a good will gesture after they fucked about for a week..). They'd also have covered 5 days of accomodation. Premiums are usually pretty low compared to the cost of something going very wrong simply because usually it doesn't (that's insurance after all). I assume at the moment it might be a tad different given risks have skyrocketed, but I'd also sort of assume that insurers are just not covering COVID related anything when it comes to cancellation..", "396" ], [ "Pretty much the opposite. EU membership is a binary state, having an in/out referendum on membership is entirely sensible, but it makes more sense if the period afterward (and before the triggering of A50 in context..) is used to discuss and define a direction outside of the EU. It all goes a bit to tits if it never moves past the leave/remain issue on to what the UK wants or what the UK can negotiate with the EU.\n\nArguably with electoral reform it should be easier, we could (should really..) be dealing with this in a gradual way (Which wasn't possible with the EU vote) and parties should be offering reform as part of the normal political discourse. Unfortunately, like the EU as an issue, the major parties don't seem to really want to push for that reform and so it is hard to focus pressure even where there is clearly a lot of support for change.", "564" ], [ "> If I were asked a simple binary question like this, I would think of “PR” as meaning a straightforward party list allocation system: vote for a party, calculate percentage share of votes, allocate corresponding percentage of available seats to parties (probably in accordance with a pre-published ordered list).\n\nRight, but I'm not sure most people would understand it like that, a straight up partly list allocation (regionally/nationally/or otherwise) is after all just one implementation, multi-member constituencies would be another. If you speak to people about PR (I did during the AV referendum, on the doorstep..) there seems to be a demand that elections be fair and proportional, but also that people are voting in their constituency for an MP **and** somehow for a government at the same time. Obviously that doesn't quite work, so any PR system would likely have to take into account other elements.\n\n > I think saying PR is just any system other than first past the post makes it so broad it’s not a useful term. It’s not just about outcomes; it’s about mechanisms.\n\nObviously saying PR is just any system other than first past the post would be false, it isn't. But PR is any system that results in a proportional outcome, that could be straight up party list voting, it could be AMS or anything else that is proportional (or largely so).\n\n > I would never describe single transferable vote as a PR system, for example. It doesn’t hinge on percentages or parties (which is really the defining feature of PR: that parties get representation which is proportional to their vote share).\n\nBut it is, and the Electoral Reform Society does describe it as a proportional system..\n\n > That said, I freely admit that I’m opposed to any form of voting for a party, and that may colour my view of what these terms would naturally and ordinarily mean!\n\nWhich becomes problematic in most contexts when you are looking at a PR system (as it is generally the 'party' that is the collective unit that you can assess votes on..). Getting rid of Parties in that context would be interesting, but would essentially require FPTP at a constituency level.", "207" ], [ "> Leaving the EU was not a binary issue.\n\nThe decision absolutely was, it's a binary state, we are either in the EU or not. The question is one of governance.\n\n > We have literally spent 4 years proving that by having individual parties unable to agree what it means between them let alone the country.\n\nEveryone agrees what being in the EU or not means, the issue has been around what to do outside of the EU, with a large rash of people wanting to go back to the decision to leave or not.\n\n > The Lib Dems, the Greens, the SNP and others all have policies on this (and Labour did in previous elections but have never moved to implement it).\n\nThey had policies on what the UK position should be on leaving the EU? Do you have links to those positions? I felt that largely they were pretty vague.", "564" ], [ "I don't think most people could claim the same either though, it's not about policy position I like (I voted Labour..) but looking back over the last couple of decades it's fair to say that bar perhaps the coalition, most government positions as expressed during a GE were the most popular ones. Not universally popular obviously, but liked by more people than the alternatives in most instances.\n\nThe issue for opposition parties has been, and remains, making their popular positions link up with what people see as most important or relevant.", "365" ], [ "> I think a focus on outcomes is looking in the wrong place.\n\nI'd agree, but I think that if you are talking about proportional representation, you can't really talk about anything other than the outcome. The whole point is that the representation people have after an election is proportionate to how votes were cast. How you get there can vary, but how proportional a result is is pretty evident.\n\n > The question of whether a system is proportional, though, depends on the mechanism which underpins it, not the results it produces.\n\nI'm not sure what you are trying to say here. A system can't be proportional, it can only lead to proportional outcomes (or more proportional/less proportional). Unless you are looking at say the franchise it doesn't seem particularly relevant.\n\n > I’m not sure that necessarily sheds any light on what people would have in mind if confronted by a straightforward “X or Y” question. People can have lots of demands or desires without necessarily thinking that the way of satisfying those should have any particular label.\n\nSure, and people need to balance different priorities all the time. The point however is that the demand for proportionality will almost certainly be constrained. You could even argue that 'proportionality' is more likely a proxy for 'fairness' or the notion that all votes should count, or possibly more accurately that people feel that their vote should be able to change things, and that they feel the current system doesn't give them that (not that a PR system neccesarily would change that..).\n\n > I suppose I’m trying to understand this particular question, and to do that I think it’s natural to pin down both options. “First-past-the-post” is clearly being used as a shorthand for our current system (and not some other system which could be described as first-past-the-post – say, a presidential-style election of a single legislator). PR must therefore also be being used as shorthand for something, and why wouldn’t that be the most straightforward and unadulterated version?\n\nBecause there isn't a straightforward and unadulterated version? There isn't a default PR system. I think it's more reasonable to argue that while FPTP is likely a proxy for the current system, 'PR' is simply a proxy for any system that people deem 'fairer' in terms of outcome.\n\nSingle transferable vote in multi-member constituencies doesn’t have any more inherent connection to a party than first-past-the-post. If you think that assessment of “proportion” in a PR system requires some sort of “collective unit”, then I don’t see how you can say STV is proportional representation.\n\n > Single transferable vote in multi-member constituencies doesn’t have any more inherent connection to a party than first-past-the-post. If you think that assessment of “proportion” in a PR system requires some sort of “collective unit”, then I don’t see how you can say STV is proportional representation.\n\nIt's the difference between voting for an MP or a party. In any practical PR system seats are parcelled out (whether directly, as additional seats etc..) on the basis of party, often on the basis of party lists (With orders selected by the party somehow internally). Currently people are voting for an MP in a 650 separate elections, they might well vote along party lines, but it is about the individual candidate. The moment you step beyond that in an attempt to create a more proportional outcome, you need something to guide what 'proportional' means. That has generally come to mean that a party should have about the same proportion of seats as it got votes and to achieve that you have a slew of routes (that might or might not make that outcome more likely..). Hence the party being the collective unit in terms of proportionality.", "207" ], [ "> I mean, this is just patently untrue. Maybe in the 1990s and early 2000s. Russia has recently recreated itself as a Middle East powerbroker in a way that it simply hasn't been since the 1970s. While under pressure in the South Caucasus from Turkey - it remains a strong regional influence from the Baltics, an undisputed influence in Central Asia. It plays a disproportionately outsized role in international politics.\n\nIt does, but only regionally and in a fairly limited way, Russia's reach is pretty limited at the moment because it doesn't have the economic or military weight that it had, it's pushing again and expanding its influence in some areas where it had previously seen it collapse, but it is still a massive way off from being a superpower and hemmed in by countries and blocks that are certainly not superpowers. I mean you could argue that the UK is in a fairly similar position in terms of influence (it is disproportionate given the UK's current role) buy no-one would claim that the UK is a superpower.", "381" ], [ "You could argue that the difference is that the journalists in the UK still ask the questions (And often when there is no answer, use that to imply whatever they want anyway..), while Journalists in the US don't seem to ask.\n\n Take the 60 minutes interview with <PERSON>, the questions weren't tough, they were pretty straightforward and fairly soft, but because they marginally challenged a narriative some see them as tough. \n\nLooking at UK vs US (and indeed German and French vs US) reporting, the difference really does seem to be that US journalists can't as easily challenge politicians (either because they don't have access or support to do so) and so much of the discussion seems to be peripheral, in little opinion bubbles, while in the UK, German and France politicians are put on the spot and are challenged. \n\nAlthough yeah, getting politicians to answer properly seems to be getting somewhat harder than it felt like it was in the past.", "519" ], [ "> Quite possibly – but then you’re really stretching the definition, if by “proportional representation” you just end up meaning “fairer than the current system”.\n\nGiven we are asking the public a question, that does seem more reasonable than assuming a given PR system though doesn't it?\n\n > Single transferable vote doesn’t. You vote for individual candidates.\n\nWell, you rank them, the idea being that the people elected are those that have the most support with the outcome being proportional to the (usually top ranked) votes cast. And you get your proportionality nationally by having more proportional local results, which in theory leads to a more proportional national outcome (although FPTP can be pretty proportional - although arguably that can be driven by things like tactical voting too.).", "207" ], [ "> Our political system doesn't allow nuance. The only thing we know is that a party had more MPs elected and in most cases didn't win the overall popular vote.\n\nIt certainly does allow for nuance, and because we are electing MP's you end up with parties that are effectively coalitions from the outset. As to the popular vote, you are sort of right. The Governing party almost always (IIRC there is one modern exception in the UK) has the largest share of the popular vote. It doesn't generally have have an overall majority..\n\n > We don't know that their policies had more than 50% support in the country and in fact I'd say it is more probable in most cases that they did not.\n\nI'm not suggesting that they had 50%+ support for many policies (although there are obviously a lot of areas where there is little variation between parties), but then that's not true of most coalition governments in countries with proportional systems either. However it is not unreasonable to suggest that Government policies usually receive more popular support than the alternatives. Where they don't they tend not to be able to pass them without opposition.\n\n > My vote doesn't count. I am irrelevant. I play no part in this political process whatsoever and am not represented at all. I will not vote again until this changes.\n\nYour vote does count, although you are one of thousands of people and so it isn't usually decisive, you are however represented and it seems a bit odd not to vote until that changes, given that voting is one of the ways that you might be able to push toward a change. I mean come on, what an absurd position, the only thing less effective in terms of getting your vote heard in the current system is not voting at all.", "207" ], [ "> And the EU would certainly love a Europhile country joining at this moment in time.\n\nWould Scotland be a Europhile country? It went 38% leave in the referendum, about the same saying 'no' to rejoining which would put it below all the nominally eurosceptic EU members, support for the Euro is pretty low, most of the same issues in terms of remainers being unenthusiastic about the EU as a project.. It's more pro-EU than England or the UK as a whole, but I'm not sure that it'd be seen as a Europhile country in the context of the EU more generally.", "852" ], [ "They were apparently waiting for QA, some were destined for non-EU COVAX countries and some of the vaccine doses were not produced in facilities approved for EU use. Because you know, vaccine production is global. Apparently it's also not unusual for producers to produce vaccines and stockpile while awaiting approvals.. I'm sure someone else can give you a more comprehensive overview though.", "374" ], [ "It's unclear whether they did or didn't, or which authorities were involved, apparently the EU has been a bit shit about all of the admin around all of this. I mean it's not as though AZ are randomly producing vaccines without telling anyone and this seems to have involved imported vaccines being bottled so.. No idea. It seems pretty unlikely that the initial claims (that this was all somehow a stockpile for the UK) is in any way true though. It's people playing politics.", "374" ], [ "> AZ is not UK. You don't have to defend it's actions by kneejerk reaction.\n\nSure, but I'm not. I'm reading the reporting on this...\n\n > It is obvious that authorities did not know about this patch.\n\nIs it? It's obvious someone fucked up, but I'm not sure it's obvious that 'the authorities' (whether in context that's a national authority in one of the relevant member states, or Italy, or one of the EU bodies..) were not aware of it..\n\n > EU doesn't have any problems with pfizer or moderna it feels bit odd to suggest that problems are only because eu has somehow failed\n\nI'm not sure how that's relevant? The Italian police appear to have raided a vaccine plant, apparently at the behest of the EU, after the EU seemingly tried to brief the press that it was an issue, and now it looks more like incompetence on the part of the EU. It shows a failure by the EU, it doesn't suggest that the EU has failed..", "374" ], [ "No? Only if you look at the reporting on this story.. I mean it's not very credible that all the reporting is in fact wrong, that AZ kept the real destination and source of the vaccines hidden, despite the police raid on their plant, that the EU have some evidence that they don't actually want to present about all of this and that it's all a massive conspiracy to... I'm not even sure what, discredit the EU's approach to vaccine management? I'm not sure that's even needed.", "374" ], [ "> So they had enough vaccines to fullfil their deliveries to EU ready, but chose to be quiet about them even when they were threated with export ban\n\nNo, they didn't and (again, from the reporting..) not from EU approved sites, I also haven't seen anything to suggest that they were being 'quiet' about them or that this changes anything about the export ban.\n\n > But yeah. EU ball bad. Thats literally your reasoning here. Only thing missing good old \"unelected bureucrats\" line\n\nI haven't said that the EU is bad. What I've said is that the EU has made some poor decisions, some clearly false statements in terms of vaccination and in this case it would appear that there is an issue with communication.. Not least given what the Italian police have said. \n\nI mean come on..", "374" ], [ "> Is crowd control an option that mods have to collapse specific comments?\n\nNo, it's automagic, although as of recently those of us on .new can uncollapse collapsed ones, so that's nice.\nAye I thought it was something like that. Their settings are set to collapse comments under x score etc.\n\nI think the default is anything negative, but I can't remember (been ages since I looked), I think mines set to whatever the lowest possible is anyway.", "621" ], [ "> I know what they meant\n\nI'm not sure I know what they meant other than self-ID not appearing to have created any risks in Ireland. I don't think broad criticism of Ireland is a useful counter. t'd be like someone suggesting that Canada's policy on cannabis is an indication that it doesn't lead to mass criminality and drug problems and you countering that with the fact that canada has a higher road death toll.. It's not really relevant and seems to be geared toward diverting away from the risk issue that you brought up.\n\n > There's simply no benefit to self-ID that outweighs the risks it brings.\n\nNot to speak for the parent, but I think their point was that Ireland shows that the risk is minimal and so your weighing of the risks and benefits may not be particularly accurate. But I think the parent has taken that up with you down thread in any case.", "579" ], [ "Because the EU presented itself as a production hub for vaccination and the producers set up there on the basis of that, the EU is producing vaccines for export that other countries have paid for (including those donated to yet other countries) because the EU had an existing production capacity and intended to ramp up massively. If you compare that to the UK, which had essentially no production capacity and is only now ramping that up it makes sense. The EU expected to see a benefit in terms of production capacity and investment, which it got.", "374" ], [ "> Would that apply to a harold <PERSON> or a scout leader who abuses kids?\n\nThe UK generally doesn't stack charges, so in both cases there would be an equally serious charge with a potential life sentence anyway, not much point in proving misconduct if someone is already going to jail and the facts are already relevant to determine sentencing..\n\n > I want a system where if someone gets 20 for abusing kids and 10 for abusing the public trust then the judge has no choice other than to send them to jail for 30 years total.\n\nWhy? Surely you want a sensible sentence and not a situation where the police charge people with a slew of additional offences. It'd be like charging someone for a robbery, and then every road traffic offence they commited evading the police too. \n\n > If there is a system in place to do that then brilliant but I dont think there is.\n\nThere isn't, and there shouldn't be, it tends to be abused.\n\nHowever there is a mechanism to deal with, say a police officer, who covers up a colleagues crime, which I thought was the initial point.", "24" ], [ "> I'm not asking for a US style system where every single count of an offence gets their own consecutive terms and people can be sentenced to hundreds of years for large numbers of petty crimes but people who abuse the public trust should always get longer for their crimes than those who dont.\n\nWhich is generally part of the sentencing guidelines and again, where an offence is minor, but breaches the public trust there is a serious offence available, so a police officer might face jail time for something where you or I might face a fine or a suspended sentence.", "24" ], [ "Everyone has paid for vaccines that haven't been delivered, as there are delivery issues. The EU set up as a production hub though, the whole aim for the EU was to draw in production and export. As to 'semantic legalese bullshit', again, that's only a tiny part of the issue.\n\n > The distribution of the vaccines really does make the world feel very ... Anglo-centric.\n\nReally? Why?\n\n > It's \"America first\"-philosophy in practice.\n\nFor literally the US yes, it's not like the UK has or expected to have excess production capacity, the UK didn't sell vaccines for that very reason. The EU did expect to have excess capacity and explicitly set itself up to sell.\n\nThat isn't something that has been done to the EU.", "374" ], [ "> The pandemic is a matter of life and death. The EU should use its capabilities first to protect its citizen before exporting to the UK or US. They then could choose to build up productions elsewhere.\n\nThat seems to be the popular position now yes. But again, at the point where vaccination production was set up, the US took that approach, were clear that that was the approach they were taking and as a result didn't see companies set up production for export in the US. The EU seems to have thought it could take advantage of that and you saw major pharmaceutical companies set up production in the EU, because they were aware that they could produce there and supply the countries that were placing orders with them. If the EU had said that they would follow the US route, then production would be more fragmented, the EU's production capacity would be lower than it is.\n\nAs an aside, the UK has a tiny vaccine manufacturing capacity, it didn't intend to export and expected to import the vaccines it wasn't producing domestically. No-one ordered vaccines from the UK because it did not have, nor intend to have the capacity to support that early on.\n\n > Unfortunately the EU commission did act differently than the UK and the US (Defense Production Act, Operation Warp Speed) and therefore has a much slower vaccination of its own citizen. This costs billions of euros and many thousands of lifes in the EU, and UK and US profit from this behaviour of the EU.\n\nThe EU took a gamble on being a production hub, and is only really being hit for that decision because of other issues (the production delays and member state distribution issues).", "374" ], [ "I don't feel strongly about it, it's what the situation is. Everyone, the UK and Canada included were wary of production from the US and actively avoided reliance on the US because of <PERSON> and the whole 'America First' thing and the understanding that the US would not allow exports. \n\nSo people didn't include the US in their vaccination supply chains... The EU on the other hand spoke out against the US position and presented itself as a production hub, which is why producers set up there (that and the EU has a really good manufacturing base for vaccines, with existing supply chains...). It's also why the UK exports components, why the EU is finishing vaccines produced elsewhere and so on.\n\nI'm sure the US is feeling good about banning exports, but the EU took a different direction pretty early on, and so no-one is reliant on the US, while a lot of countries are reliant on the EU, because the EU effectively told the world that it could be relied on.", "374" ], [ "> Do you seriously think that our vaccine production facilities just appeared in the last year,just because of our Covid policy? \n\nNo? the vaccine production facilities were built out, there was massive investment and re-tooling of existing facilities, a huge amount of money was spent to get them operational. That money was spent by a lot of countries (within and outside of the EU) and put up exactly because people wanted to get production on stream. \n\n > Do you think that if the EU banned export, there would be any non-banning nations the UK could export components to?\n\nSorry, what? If the EU banned exports, then I'd expect other production hubs to try and take up some of the slack, the UK and other component producers would presumably still export to the EU (unless there was a tit for tat response, which I'd hope wouldn't be the case...). Obviously countries using the EU for finishing would likely look elsewhere, but broadly it'd just create a massive bottleneck.\n\n > You seem to be under the impression that the EU owes you and everyone else something. Like you are all doing us a favour buying up our produced vacciness, like there a plenty of alternatives around if we don't deliver.\n\nYes, because it does. Because it told the world that it would be a production hub and that countries could place orders and base their production there, and those countries paid for the doses they are getting. The EU can of course intervene in that if it wants, I can see a fair few countries seeing that as a bad thing, and indeed that undermining confidence in the viability of using the EU for critical supply in the future.. \n\nAgain, the point here isn't that lots of countries demanded that the EU do something, it's that the EU positioned itself to do something and has had issues delivering, and is now trying to shift the narriative.\n\n > The US isn't exporting. India isn't exporting. So this is very much a sellers market right now, and if we close the door we're not really loosing out.\n\nThe US was never expecting, or expected to export. India and the EU were and yeah that'll have repercussions. And it is a sellers market, the EU can cut off supplies to other countries. I'd expect a backlash if that were to happen, but it certainly can do so, and if it does it should be criticised for doing so.", "374" ], [ "> Mate, the world isn't going back to global logistic chains for vaccine production. There is no future in this narrative of \"trusted hub\". That's done. We're lucky our first experiences with the end of the \"liberalize strategic assets\" non-sense wasn't food production.\n\nThat's where it is now.. \n\n > We're all shifting to pharma-protectionism now, and that isn't going to be about \"attracting investment\" , \"lobbying customers\" or \"building confidence\", what it's going to be about is command-and-control economics.\n\nThat'd be pretty devastating for the EU and everyone else, it means lots of fragmented small scale production, issues around licensing, difficulties in securing components and precursors. In short, it'd be a worse situation than the current one, with very few wins for anyone, we only really get there if the EU decides to go down that route and india intensifies its position..\n\n > Like I told you, read the room. Nothing you are arguing about matters anymore.\n\nYes. It absolutely does, because the next step will be what the response is to the supposed production hubs binning exports, assuming the EU does.", "374" ], [ "> In the end, it will be an Airbus vs Boeing situation, large pharma mega-complexes with government backers entering in a competition of global hegemony as smaller players either find a very specific niche or die.\n\nNot really. If your prediction is right it'd end up more like the more generic defence production with countries producing for a domestic market and licensing output but not the underlying tech. You'd end up with most major countries being able to produce domestically with some element of international trade along various lines. You'd see a spike in costs for vaccines (and other medicines given this stuff clusters) too and a loss of investment and spending in the existing hubs as their customer bases collapse.\n\nYou need to be a massive country to be able to support aircraft manufacture at any sort of reasonable scale, pharmaceutical production falls a little short of that. Although you'd have to hope it doesn't also fragment research..\n\n > We don't grow components or precusors in fields, they're location-agnostic. \n\nThey are, but they thrive on specialisation. Having one country produce a lot (or even all) of something specialised rather than having lots of countries produce much smaller amounts of the same thing tends to be vastly more efficient. Sure, you can probably do it anywhere (assuming you can license the technology and techniques etc..) but it creates costs.\n\n > And, btw in case you haven't catched on, the previous regime of global liberalization has exactly lead to a scarcity of components, which is what we are seeing right now. There is nothing to spare for the crisis, because \"spare production\" is not profitable.\n\nAgreed entirely, it's why there was such a focus to ramp up in those places with existing infrastructure, rather that every country building out a duplicate.\n\n > The EU has no impact on if this future comes about, it is coming. We only choose if we are one of the players or the board.\n\nThe EU absolutely does, if it decides to bin exports, that collapses the existing model and you'll see fragmentation and a shift toward self-reliance, if it doesn't its more likely to be seen as a trusted partner and be able to maintain what it has built around vaccination and pharmaceuticals more broadly.", "374" ], [ "> Passport control for everybody, and everything gets controlled.\n\nThe UK and Ireland have a CTA so there is 'free movement' between Ireland and the UK and visa cooperation, outside of EU membership and so no requirement for passport checks.\n\nIreland also isn't in Schengen, so there is already a requirement to pass through immigration control (and so passport checks) when EU nationals enter Ireland other than via the UK. \n\nIreland manages its own entry and exit requirements (Schengen visas are not valid for Ireland or the UK..) as it is not in Schengen, that isn't going to change with the UK leaving the EU.", "631" ], [ "> Workers should always work \"to rule\".\n\nSort of, there are times where (with good management..) you can ask more of staff for a week of two, but the key is to pay them, make sure they get TOIL and so on. It's when you expect staff to 'volunteer' to do more than they are being paid for, in exchange for nebulous benefits, or where there is an expectation of overwork (or stupid things like not taking time off when ill) where you have an issue.\n\n > Do it right the first time and you don't have to do it a second time usually. If it takes 4 hours to overhaul a planetary horn valve, then that's how long it takes. If management is telling you to cut corners, but not which ones to cut, then you are the scapegoat when something goes tits up.\n\nAbsolutely.", "641" ], [ "> Not sure that's good enough anymore now the UK left the EU.\n\nThat's the situation though, the EU can't change it and I can't see Ireland or the UK wanting to.\n\n > There's also goods. You could bring in illegal stuff through the UK, then into Ireland and then into the EU. I don't want to eat poisoned fish from China that got into the EU by that route.\n\nGoods do need to be checked, they don't need to be checked at the border. That's sort of the important part.\n\n > And I'm also thinking illegal migrants could use the UK as a loophole to get into the EU.\n\nThey can use Airports in Ireland to do the same if they wanted to, I mean, in the context of a loophole and the EU's other external borders, having a CTA that has external controls (Ireland has them with the rest of the EU, as does the UK..) I'm not sure what it changes.\n\n > It's good Ireland isn't in Schengen, BUT anybody that got a residence permit in Ireland would, as far as I know, be able to go anywhere in the EU because of the free movement of labour.\n\nYeah, that's not how that works. Just because someone can get to Ireland doesn't mean that they have a right to live and work in Ireland, never mind the rest of the EU. Just getting to Germany from Ireland doesn't mean a thing if you are a non-EU national without a visa. Indeed a non-EU national legally living in Ireland needs a visa to travel to the rest of the EU now under quite a few circumstances.\n\n > We don't want Ireland to become the new Greece with migrants pouring through.\n\nIt wouldn't. Or at least not unless the EU Schengen states reduce their own border controls with regard to transit from Ireland.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n", "631" ], [ "> In Ireland it was never up front anyway. The results on the search page and the map (as well as using the max/min cost limiter) were always lower than what you would actually pay even though you already have all the specifics given (dates and people).\n\nThat's interesting, was it just straight up misleading or was it additional charges?\n\nIt's quite amusing if you look at the UK south coast though, you end up with loads of cheap offers just on the other side of the channel, and much more expensive ones on the UK side (but that's probably just the market).", "146" ], [ "> With incoming tarrifs people will buy European fish which is cheaper. \n\nThe title of the article is... \"The European Union has reached its fish dependency day, theoretically exhausting all of its fishing supply and now relying on imports\"\n\nAnd just as an aside, it'd be quite a bit earlier if the EU actually set quotas based on the scientific advice it commissions rather than above what is suggested.", "631" ], [ "> IDK, that looks good to me for people and visas etc.\n\nNot sure what you are trying to say there (Sorry, may be being dense..). \n\n > Just not sure if the goods would not have to be checked at the border, for tariffs etc. If you don't check them AT the border, you could import dodgy illegal stuff through the UK from god knows where, then switch them with something legal, have the legal stuff checked, and voila the dodgy illegal stuff is inside the inner market.\n\n > The controls have to be better for that, since before they were like pre-checked by having entered the UK. But not, if the UK makes a deal to accept to import like poisoned fish from China or whatever, it's not like that any more.\n\nAbout 2-3% of goods are checked at borders (the current EU borders..), that increases for high risk shipments, decreases for low risk ones. Not everything is checked. Given that Ireland is an Island, it should be workable to check goods at ports, report (for tariffs) and spot check at logistics hubs. It's not perfect, but nothing is.\n\nA huge amount of 'dodgy' goods are detected once they are in country (and being sold) after all, under the current system, within the EU.", "631" ], [ "> It really doesn't. The articles makes no point about what's the fish deficit of the UK, so you can't separate it from the rest of the EU. You might be right, it's certainly believable, but the articles doesn't demonstrate that.\n\nTrue. In theory, if the UK's demand was a little more than half the total EU demand and the UK catch (or catch in UK waters..) was negligible it would be possible that the UK is actually the cause of the EU needing to import fish after a certain point. \n\nHowever since we know that isn't the case, or close to being the case I think its fair to suggest that the article demonstrates that the EU is not in a position where it doesn't need to import fish to meed demand.", "631" ], [ "The argument from the article is:\n\n > The origins of the left are in arguing that ordinary people ought to have a right to a say in political affairs, to shape and determine their political surroundings and everyday lives. From the Peterloo Massacre to the Chartist uprising to <PERSON> radical cries for female suffrage and socialist democracy, every significant left campaign of modern times has been devoted to expanding the democratic ideal; to involving as many people as possible in decision-making processes that were previously considered the preserve of the well-educated and the aristocratic. In devoting itself to overturning a radical act of democracy, a vote for democracy, Labour tramples over this tradition and positions itself as the party of the new globalist elites rather than the majority of British voters – a party of the few, not the many. Many of us have said this for years, but others will now surely realise it too: Labour is in no meaningful way a left-wing party or a party of the working class.\n\nSo in reversing its position on the referendum result, and arguably in delegating powers to the EU (which can rightly be argued to be an institution that is geared toward supporting a capitalist system and weakening socialist positions..) thus weakening public political input in areas that are pretty core left wing issues (like working conditions, and economic policy..) one could argue that Labour backing the EU is 'betraying' the things it should stand for, and pushing to maintain the status quo which hasn't been particularly kind to lower income working class groups in the UK.", "365" ], [ "Essentially a lot of the fish caught is discarded at sea (too small/wrong type etc..), obviously that screws with management of stock levels, Norway started to ban that (for various types at least) in the mid 80's, the EU started down that route (IIRC) about two decades ago, it came into force this year. However, the compromise was that given commercial vessels could no longer (legally..) discard significant portions of their catch anymore, and had to land it, that the amount of fish they were allowed to land was increased to balance it out..\n\nAnd on the latter, the advice given about levels of catch (Total Allowable Catch, should have expanded that..) are generally quite a bit higher than what they should be based on the scientific advice on what is acceptable to maintain stocks and retain an ecological balance. That's because the advice is fed into a negotiating process and the actual catch levels (via the CFP..) are set in a political context rather than a scientific one (as such).", "517" ], [ "> ??? You have this 100% backwards. \n\nNo, I really don't.. The EU economic project is about creating and protecting markets in Europe, it is fundamentally founded on a broadly capitalistic endeavour (which makes sense, that's how the world broadly works..) it removes state intervention as a tool and aims to pool regulatory powers within a single body, with the effectiveness of the market being the aim (the thought being that with free markets, people are free and more prosperous - that's an ideological argument of course..).\n\n > The EU is the largest consumer protection and workers rights body in the world,\n\nIt might be the largest body responsible for managing them (although arguably the Chinese Government would be larger), but surely the relevant aspect would be what it actually does with those powers? Unions and Labour movements have done far more than the EU has done to protect workers. Some EU member states (including the UK) have seen a reduction in workers rights while in the EU. Indeed the EU has pushed for the erosion of worker and consumer rights in a slew of areas and has at times forced member states to reduce protections (because higher protections are barrier in a market, and mean there isn't a level playing field..). Not to mention that the where there has been a conflict between the operation of the EU market and specifically the Euro, the EU has actively thrown things like unions under the bust to solve issues. The EU does provide minimums, but member states regularly exceed them in the areas where that is permitted (so where the EU hasn't regulated, or has specified a minimum).\n\n > leaving the EU is what industrialists and capitalists want because it will increase their profit margins at the cost of the social benefits the EU insists on.\n\nAnd yet big business, industrialists and capitalists are calling for the UK to remain in large numbers... Almost as if it wasn't quite that simple.", "437" ], [ "> Such as?\n\nEstablish the basis for pretty much all of the workers rights we have now, as well as the idea of the welfare state? Workers rights are the result of Unions and Labour movements fighting for them both politically, economically and at times in the streets.\n\n > Such as?\n\nMost recently? In terms of consumer rights, reducing protections around Net Neutrality in the Netherlands and in terms of workers using the Greek Bail out to impose what are arguably some of the harshest anti-union measures (effectively massively raising the bar for collective action) in Europe on Greece?\n\nNone of this is particularly controversial..", "334" ], [ "> However, in my experience, what a lot of people in here and the other place consider to be working class are nowhere near working class. That's where I find a lot of misunderstanding and confusion comes from.\n\nTo be fair, the definitions for classes have always been somewhat vague and have only become more so as our society and indeed economy has evolved. It's almost more about self-identification now and aspiration than anything else.", "954" ], [ "> I'd argue the EU has done more for a larger group of workers than any Labour movement anywhere ever.\n\nThat might be right in an incremental sense (although I'd love to see some analysis) and probably if you ignore the Chinese and India (China is a hideous regime, but they have pulled massive numbers out of abject poverty, India is having to do the same, but in a mostly democratic context, and the numbers are staggering). The EU can certainly have a broad impact, there almost certainly have been benefits for workers in some EU member states. But even if you look in isolation at the UK, France and Germany, all of them have done far more domestically than the EU has done, and the EU poses a potential threat to all three if it regulates in areas where any of them have stronger protections than the EU offers.\n\n > <PERSON> is this really the best you could come up with?\n\nThe examples you asked for? What did you want?\n\nI mean compared to 'I'd argue' followed by restating what you said earlier, it at least has the benefit of being grounded in fact.\n\nI mean come on, how, with any understanding of the history of things like workers rights, can you come to the conclusion that the EU has done more than the Labour movement or Unions? The one argument about the EU that is arguably offensive when it comes from the left, is that it is responsible for protecting workers rights. That is essentially shifting the credit for a massive amount of work done by normal people, fighting for their rights collectively and handing it to an organisation that at its core balances corporate need and markets with everything else.\n\nIt's mad.", "437" ], [ "> So the Lisbon treaty didn't happen, because that's impossible? \n\nNo, it happened because the existing members agreed to it. Members aren't going to agree to anything that allows a member to be removed as the act (or the threat) would massively undermine most of the protections EU members have.\n\n > That's exactly what I mean by politicians making up their own rules. I didn't say that it's all done in a cozy afternoon for them.\n\nIn which case sure, any rules can be changed if you get agreement, but that is so vague and pointless as a statement to be irrelevant to the point you responded to. EU members cannot be removed, there is no viable process that is likely to change that as it goes directly against member state interests.", "437" ], [ "It's a bit odd looking at a map, NI is obviously quite a bit smaller than Ireland, but it's 5x smaller with a population of around a third. Then again I always think that Belfast is bigger than the 500k population makes it sound, and that the whole region that is Derry and Strabane only has a population of 150k.\n\nI'm also slightly surprised that Galway isn't bigger in population terms.. But then the rural parts of NI feel fairly sparsely populated, and given that it's about half as densely populated as Yorkshire, that makes sense. That Ireland is half as dense again (or about) just seems a bit mad. Although I suppose Dublin might skew that a bit.", "908" ], [ "> Except socialism has it's roots in transnational ideas and internationalism. \n\nAbsolutely.\n\n > The nation state is part of the false consciousness and helps mislead the proletariat. Thus the EU, as a transnational body, helps unite workers who have more in common due to their economic class.\n\nWhich would make perfect sense, if the EU weren't what it is, didn't have the aims or structure it has and so on. Just because something is multinational or internationalist doesn't make it inherently a socialist construct, or positive with regard to a socialist cause. Obviously..\n\n > Whereas in reality we see the EU strengthening workers rights and working conditions. The working time directive for example.\n\nExcept we don't always (often its about finding a floor at the base of what EU members already have in place), and we have seen it weakening workers rights.", "534" ], [ "> Why should I take the time to engage you in a detailed discussion involving actual analysis? You seem really, really daft.\n\nMostly because otherwise it looks like you are pulling nonsense from your arse? I mean that is the case anyway, but it'd be fun to see you try to justify it.\n\n > <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON> are, ironically, the greatest things to ever happen to Ireland.\n\nProbably not, Ireland will be fine, but it's arguably also one of the biggest losers from the UK leaving the EU, the UK will be absolutely fine too of course, and at least it actually has control over its own internal governance, commercial policy and trade going forward. But hey, as long as Ireland is happy with an ever integrating EU that's a net positive for everyone isn't it?", "631" ], [ "You could make the same argument about the 70's and 80's. To a certain extent you had a window from the mid 1990's until 2005 or so where things went really well (the 'end of boom and bust', consistent growth, a government focused on social spending and infrastructure investment etc..). If you look objectively at most of the period in which the UK was in the EU it has hardly been particularly pretty.\n\nThe key point however is that its domestic government policy that makes the most difference, the EU thing is something of a red herring in that regard, what I would say is that leaving the EU means that UK governments have more of the right tools to make a difference and position the UK internationally, but if you want to see domestic improvements, that's still more down to UK government policy than almost anything else.", "631" ], [ "> I don't have any ego wrapped up in your opinions, so that's not a motivator.\n\nAnd yet your entire narriative here seems to be counter factual and egotistical and a tad jingoistic to boot.\n\n > You can't even feed yourselves\n\nYes the UK can feed itself... Food is available and cheap.\n\n > and your economy has collapsed enough to set a 300 year record, \n\nThe economy dropped more than it has in 300 years, it also recorded the highest growth in the same period, it contracted less than Spain, and around the same amount as France and Italy.. You may have noticed the massive global pandemic..\n\n > But you think everything is going to be fine. Under an administration which seems to think it's the 20th century, and can't even meet basic deadlines.\n\nYes? Because again, that's what the economic projections from everyone, including the EU suggest..\n\n > Someone who thinks that's all fine and dandy is the sort of person you laugh about, not the kind of person whose opinion you value.\n\nErm.. OK.\n\n > We'll be fine. At minimum, we can feed ourselves independently. You cannot. Countries will be able to charge you anything they like for food imports, and I hope they're as merciless to you as your government was to us.\n\nAgain, that's an absurd analysis.. The UK has had no issue securing food and will have no issues securing food, it hasn't been self sufficient in food production at any point in modern history, I think 1750 is around the point where it last was. It's far from alone in that it's just not a risk.\n\n > This has been a thoroughly enjoyable little back and forth. Thanks for being you, and for contributing toward the UK's current trajectory.\n\nSure, but you are obviously still somewhat confused about exactly what that trajectory is.", "631" ], [ "> The CFP managed to make fishing somewhat sustainable \n\nThat was the aim, but it didn't, the sustainability targets have been pushed off so many times that they are still not in place, and the quota assignments continue to overshoot the levels that the EU's own scientific advice. It's not perfect, it's essentially an institutionalised patch that allows unsustainable activities to continue with a veneer of acceptability. Most of that is because of the political aspects not the practical ones. As an aside it also hasn't really protected fishing communities either, but rather provided a boon for the larger players (especially the multinationals..) in the industry.\n\nIt hasn't been all bad but I'm not sure it hasn't followed fairly inevitable change rather than led it.", "517" ], [ "> lol...you don't know anything about your own country.\n\nYou keep saying that without backing it up in any way..\n\n > Without importing vast quantities of food, you all starve.\n\nYes, the UK is not in any way self-sufficient, the UK doesn't however have any issues importing food, which is why UK food prices are low and availability is high. The UK has not and will not face issues feeding itself going forward.", "1000" ], [ "> Ah, you also seem to struggle with differentiating between past tense and future tense. That inability to discern our present position in time just might be the root of your collective insanity. Ye still think ye've the leverage of an empire. 😄 How quaint.\n\nNot at all...\n\n > \"We never ran out of food when everything was different, so we'll never run out of food or face the consequences of our extreme dependency on foreign food.\"\n\nWhat planet are you on? No-one but you is suggesting that the UK is going to 'run out of food'. It's not a thing, it makes no sense, it has no basis in any reality. The UK is able to import food, there is nothing preventing that.\n\n > Like, I half think you're satirising the English. Is that what's happening? If so, 10/10.\n\nIt is a bit <PERSON>'s law to a certain extent, I can't tell if you are trolling or really this misinformed.", "579" ], [ "Maybe I should have been clearer, how is that relevant here? They can take positive environmental action without much cost to themselves, little cost to the UK industry, appear to get one up on the EU, and get environmental brownie points all at the same time. This is one of those things where oddly enough the politically beneficial thing for the Tories to do is also the environmental positive.", "365" ], [ "> The UK must import food. Regardless of the cost. It has no alternative. All us food producing countries have to do is mostly agree to pillage the UK on this basis.\n\nBut 'all you food producing countries' don't generally agree to do so (and really it's about exporters not countries anyway), and of course there are huge numbers of countries that export food (including the UK..) and buy other foods and other goods. There is no scenario here where the UK can't source foods, or the 'world' somehow conspires to not sell to the UK.\n\n > What fascinates me is this generally English delusion that the UK still has some major advantages, proper leverage. \n\nThe UK does, it's a massive advanced economy with a lot of soft power and military capacity.. It's wealthy, innovates, does a lot of manufacturing and so on. I mean, for context the UK exports 3x as much in the way of foodstuffs as Ireland, it imports more too, but that's sort of the point of trade. Countries trade, the UK is well positioned to trade, there is no issue with it accessing food imports.\n\n > While it still does a few things reasonably well, like finance, it no longer has anything uniquely going for it. \n\nExcept being a really big, advanced economy\n\n > Essentially everyone else in the world thinks the Brexiteer English are insane...but, they've somehow convinced that everyone else is dumb. It's the European version of America's ideology of exceptionalism.\n\nSome certainly do, but I'm sure as someone from Ireland you understand the value of self-determination as much as anyone.", "631" ], [ "> It's not necessarily all or nothing. If only half the country want independence, why not negotiate something else?\n\nIf half the population don't agree to union, then remaining in the union is illegitimate, if you think you can convince some of those over to remaining part of a union before the vote by offering devolution, then you probably need to do that before any vote.\n\nI get where you are coming from, but the point is that absent a 50%+1 support for the underlying governmental system it doesn't seem particularly viable without creating massive issues with legitimacy and consent, and indeed the whole principle of self-determination.", "593" ], [ "> You're still missing the point, by way of diversion to extremes. I never suggested that the UK will be unable to source food in the next decade or two, only that the situation is vastly, even obscenely, in favour of the foreign sellers. They have you by the short and curlies, and they'll every millimetre of that expansive, thick leverage -- it's what humans have always done.\n\nYou suggested that countries could band together to price gouge the UK specifically, something that makes pretty much no sense in the context of how the world works at the moment. And again, the UK has lower food prices than most of Europe, there is no issue with price gouging or sourcing goods. Arguably it is often a sellers market, that's why the EU and others put up barriers to imports.\n\n > You tried to hand wave the situation away by pretending that I was referencing an absolutist extreme like \"there will be no food imports whatsoever and ye'll all die.\" G'wan away ya gomie. You're going off about fantastical binary extremes, and I'm over here talking about the gradients of the real world.\n\nAnd in the real world, the UK being a net food importer is pretty irrelevant, yet you are suggesting it somehow contributes to the UK being 'doomed'. The UK isn't doomed, economically or otherwise.\n\n > Genuinely chuckled when I read your description of the UK's only unique advantage: preexisting wealth.\n\nThat's not unique to the UK, it's pretty relevant though given it means that there is inward and external investment and it comes with decent living standards and opportunity..\n\n > Sure, here we agree. Fools and their money are soon parted. Empires crumble all the time. Countless. One more for the pile.\n\nThe British Empire died a long time ago, the UK hasn't been an imperial power for a very long time, so I'm not sure how that's relevant..\n\n > Then, I realised, for certain, that I'm talking to someone whose ego exceeds their capacity; it revealed itself when you compared the UK's food output to Ireland as a total, rather than as a ratio, and thought 3x Ireland's ouput was something to brag about (hint: the UK's population is ~10x larger).\n\nIf we ignore the fact that you were trying to suggest that the UK's imports of food were somehow a massive issue..\n\n > We, here in Ireland, should start organising general price fixing on sales to the UK;\n\nYou should. Although the outcome would simply be less sales to the UK (That is something that Ireland has been happy to see of course, as it reduces Irish dependence on UK trade). I mean if you'd prefer the UK to buy elsewhere then raising prices would be the way to go.\n\n > among survivors of English abuses. A campaign to take back that preexisting wealth you mentioned. It wouldn't take much to start moving prices up, and every bit counts. 👍🏻😄\n\nWell good luck with that. By the by, the word you are after is 'British' not English, Scotland and Wales were as complicit as England in Empire, arguably Ireland has a bit of intertwined legacy there too. But hey, you carry on. It sounds like you have some things to work through.", "631" ], [ "> Wow, you really don't know your own history. Shockingly so. If you did, you'd know how effectively the UK used these same tactics, and how devastating they were against food-dependent targets.\n\nAnd if you can explain how that's relevant now, in the globalised economy we operate in now, that'd might be useful. But it's not is it?\n\n > You're hysterical. I'm genuinely torn about whether or not you're satirising them, because it's uncanny.\n\nRight, because I'm the one having a fit about how little old long suffering Ireland might be able to use food as leverage against big bad Britain..? Come on lad, stop being daft.", "579" ], [ "I'd agree with all of that, although again, the projections on loss were predicated on no mitigation by government, which is somewhat unlikely again (and domestic policy tends to have more of an impact, arguably government spending alone has a significant impact on GDP). Leaving the single market creates a level of trade friction with the EU that isn't likely to be balanced out by other FTA's obviously, but that doesn't mean that a combination of trade substitution, FTA's, domestic policy shifts and so on aren't likely to minimise the risk. And again, compared to the impact of covid, it absolutely is marginal.\n\n > Economically, this whole project seems to be ill-conceieved indeed\n\nIt not being an economic project as such, is probably one core reason for that though. The point was to remove the UK from a a relatively inward looking regional block that is integrating and involves a broad and deep political union, that there were likely to be economic costs, certainly short term ones has been clear since before the vote (with both leave and remain sides seemingly being aware of that). The focus on GDP is also somewhat flawed, it doesn't really give a good measure of the impact on individuals in the UK after all.", "631" ], [ "> You're right.. FTAs with US and CPTPP might be slight mitigating factors, however they don't even a cover a fraction of the loss from leaving the internal market. We could say it's all damage limitation..\n\nIt creates opportunity and potential, that's not a bad thing, but its not a drop in replacement. What it does mean is that the UK is responsible for those relationships (and so can be tied into foreign policy, aid and so on far more closely).\n\n > Likewise, the 08 financial crisis is marginal compared to COvid, when it comes to gdp contraction..Still would not inflict it deliberately on a nation though..\n\nNo, but then being in the EU is not zero cost, it's just hard (much like leaving..) to really quantify it beyond the direct financial transfers and VAT payments etc. I mean in an economic context the UK had a pretty shit time for a lot of the period it was in the EU (not neccesarily because of the EU, although some of it was certainly linked..). If you look at the 70's, 80's and early 90's, and then the period post 2008, it's hardly pretty, we essentially have a good run from the mid 90's through to 2008, while the rest of it is incredibly volatile in terms of the business cycle and economic growth.\n\nLeaving the EU for better trade opportunities with the EU would be daft, but leaving the EU to regain regulatory control over the UK's internal market and to leave the political union is something different again.", "631" ], [ "> You evidently don't keep up on international issues, because the nature of extreme imbalances in essential goods has remained fundamentally the same and as easily exploited as ever.\n\nI do keep up on international issues, and again, food is subsidised by most countries and freely traded, there is no issue with access to food for the UK, nor is there likely to be. Countries usually try to make it hard for food to be imported to protect their own producers after all.\n\n > And we'll mock, satirise, and exploit yiz until you change your culture and make an effort to undo your inherited legacy. Or until our population recovers to pre-genocide levels.\n\nWell good luck with that.", "1000" ], [ "> In an economic context the growth and prosperity Britain witnessed since the early 1980s ( big bang) until 2020 has been staggering which is partly a consequence of being in the internal market which was a driver for liberalising trade.\n\nYou have to massively ignore the disparities in terms of where those gains landed and the massive increase in inequality to get there though. The UK essentially went through a massive economic pivot, the 'big bang' of the 80's mated up financial deregulation with deindustrialisation, massive inflation, huge unemployment and the loss of mass employers (partly as a consequence of being in the internal market, which reduced barriers and killed UK industry which was comparably less well supported...). Essentially there were a lot of losers, hence the unemployment rate, massive pension poverty and so on. \n\n > (No wonder every developed European nation joined it). Additionally, boomnand busts happen all the time through ouy time whether you're part of a block or not..\n\nSure. But the economic pivot that the UK went through after joining the EU arguably exaggerated the impact in the UK (and it's hard not to link things like the ERM crisis more directly into that).\n\n > Also gaining regulatory control is always a means to an end. What is the end though? Higher gdp per capita , higher HDI, increased welfare?\n\nDepends on the government, you'd hope it'd be focused on HDI/living standards rather than raw GDP given the inequality of the gains, you could probably argue that targets around employment and income factor into that too.\n\n > Alas brexit does not provide any of those.. the aim of government policy should always be to try and increase the welfare of its citizens, which leaving the EU evidentially does not provide\n\nBrexit in isolation is a political and economic shift, everything else is about what government does with the powers returned to the UK, raw GDP growth is a bad measure of the welfare of a countries citizens too.", "841" ], [ "> The demise of the coal and the British manufacturing industry was primarily due to domestic policy and the woeful management of British companies - nothing to do with the European single market.\n\nThe competition with more efficient (or simply subsidised) EU firms as part of the single market was a factor though. UK domestic policy could have been used to shield and support UK industry, but obviously that wasn't really a thing at the time. The impact is the same though.Heck, the west \n\n > German economy was powering along and the single market didn't seem to hurt their economy( or Dutch, french or other Western nations).\n\nAgreed, but they were subject to both more state intervention and were already part of the EC when the UK joined, in short they didn't face the same shocks but a gradual shift. Domestic policy failures in managing EC ascension coupled with an ideological (failed as it turned out..) approach to the economy by <PERSON> were pretty dramatic. \n\n > And yes GDP growth is a massive indicator of public welfare. Why do you think every country is desperate to drive growth? Furthermore it's directly linked to living standards, you can't stem growth and increase your living standards.\n\nGDP is an indicator, but not the only one and again significant inequality in the distribution of GDP gains devalues it massively. It is linked to living standards, but again, if the last decade has shown us anything, it's not directly coupled and there is a huge amount of variance when it comes to gains and benefits.\n\n > By that argument Wales, Scotland , Bavaria ( or even smaller regions like Unterfranken) should want sovereignty because economic welfare is not as important.. interesting logic\n\nScotland does, parts of Wales do, Ireland did. Economic welfare is important, it is however not the be all and end all, we constantly compromise the potential for GDP growth for other reasons (privatising the NHS would lead to a fairly significant GDP boost for example, but would also likely hit living standards and access to healthcare, I doubt many people would argue that it'd be worth doing on the basis that it'd provide a boost to GDP).", "841" ], [ "> What <PERSON> says and what he does are not the same. \n\nHe also seems to have been pretty opposed to <PERSON> broad foreign policy approaches, was pretty clear he'd lost the election and as far as I am aware didn't do anything to enable <PERSON>.. What makes you think that he supported <PERSON> or fascism/white nationalism?\n\n > Perhaps cryptofascist would be more accurate.\n\nI doubt that..It doesn't make sense with anything we know about <PERSON>.", "211" ], [ "> By 2024 it's highly likely that the full negative consequences of Brexit will have hit, on top of an economy already beaten up by covid.\n\nSort of not really, by 2024 the UK will have likely been through a post covid recovery that largely masks the short term brexit shock, if the EU is slow in its vaccine roll out, or hits any other issues it is not unlikely that they'll be lagging somewhat. Anyone expecting some sort of significant or visible impact of brexit to use to attack the Tories in 2024 are likely to be disappointed.", "631" ], [ "Fuck that, a written constitution and federalisation, alongside massive structural reform? No thank you, I'd be happy with all of those (bar perhaps a written constitution in the US sense) as aims for evolutionary change, but not quickly and not without looking at the impact. The FTPA was relatively minor and caused massive issues, can you imagine what a written constitution would do or rapid federalisation? The UK broadly 'works' because change has been gradual and the kinks have been slowly worked out, rapid and significant change is a recipe for disaster. Let's start with some electoral reform, then see if there is a consensus and consent for some structural reform and shifts in institutions.", "45" ], [ "> whereas the Japanese can quite happily push around a country like the UK.\n\nThe UK rolled over the EU's FTA with Japan and more to the point, what is 'a country like the UK' in context? It's a massive economy, there aren't exactly a lot of countries larger or more capable. Indeed once you hook UK foreign policy into trade policy (which the UK can do now), the UK is in a pretty decent position.", "631" ], [ "> As you say, 50% of the population voting for independence would make the Union untenable - so why not demonstrate that?\n\nBecause we do usually infer from a vote, and obviously because if you have 50%+1 voting for independence, then you have an even smaller proportion voting in support of the union, it still undermines the legitimacy of the constitutional settlement.\n\nAll in it'd probably be better to try and actually get people to vote to remain in the union rather than changing the way we handle referendums and voting and so, undermine the legitimacy of the whole thing.", "845" ], [ "> Where are the mods here? Can I please get some support to the amount of abuse I’m getting for literally owning a flat? This is crazy. I’m trying to work and my phone is going mental with people calling me a parasite, a leech, all sorts of horrible things.\n\nRemoving outright personal attacks where they are reported or we see them. Obviously that'll happen after they are posted, and doesn't extend to removing comments from people who expressing a negative view of landlords more generally.", "621" ], [ "> So as with most of the \"democratic failings\" of the EU, the problem there was with the national governments, not with the EU.\n\nJust as a side note, in context the national governments are the EU. The EU doesn't operate in isolation. \n\nI mean it's probably fair to say that most of the tensions within the EU end up being about whether powers sit with the EU or the member states, and what legitimacy there is to exercise them.\n\n > The national governments chose not to follow the conventions, and the EU itself doesn't have enough power to force them to do so. Unfortunately certain national governments (often led by the UK) have spent decades blocking most attempts to fix these sorts of problems; not wanting to give up power to the democratic process.\n\nSure, because in context that leads to a power transfer, and the democratic process in an EU context is still flawed and obviously not the same (EU wide) as nationally. I don't think there has been a lot of popular support and so consent on the UK side for a larger transfer of power to the EU, which leaves the EU as the ugly duckling both lacking democratic consent or the powers to do anything about it, and people not wanting to hand off powers to the EU, as it lacks a solid democratic base, and of course the issues around the notion of a single european demos.\n\n > Of course, this is still slightly more transparent and democratic than the UK's system, where sometimes Prime Ministers are appointed based on internal party political processes; neither the public nor the House of Commons got to have a say in appointing <PERSON> or <PERSON> as Prime Minister, for example.\n\nNot really, the system is well accepted and subject to parliamentary approval in any case, bar the problems that the FTPA caused, it's hard to call the EU approach more transparent, it isn't even consistent or predictable, nor is it really subject to popular political accountability.", "437" ], [ "Which of those was appointed PM immediately after a GE where a slew of other people were presented as the choices on offer?\n\nYou seem to be conflating the process of what happens after a PM stands down with the process expected after an election.. You'll note that all of them (bar <PERSON>) won the elections they called after taking over as party leader too. I don't think the UK has had an election where people voting for the winning party ended up with a PM who wasn't the leader of the party going into the election.", "207" ], [ "> What I'm pointing out is that the PM at the time of the next general election isn't necessarily the candidate for PM at the last election\n\nAnd that's fair enough, but that applies to every system including the EU, US and everyone else. The difference is that in a UK election, the people going into the election (so presumably form some of the reasons people vote for a given party, rightly or wrongly) are the people who become PM and lead the government. That wasn't the case in 2019 with the EP election.\n\n > and due to that results of the 2019 European Elections the Commission President wasn't able to be the PES' or EPP's first choice so a compromise candidate was chosen instead with the Parliament retaining their oversight of the Commission should they wish to exercise it. <PERSON> and <PERSON> were more conventional as due to the results of the elections they were allowed to be as the EPP had more political capital with the number of MPs.\n\nSo the EU ended up with a situation were the slate of candidates that were seen as being those who would take the presidency, based on how their parties performed in the EP elections, were essentially dumped, and not because of the EP, but rather because of the heads of government (so the Council..) didn't like the alternatives. The equivalent would be the UK having a GE, Labour being in a position to form a minority government and being told that rather than the party leader being PM they'd get someone else from within the party (although not an elected MP) to take the job instead.\n\nIt's not really equivalent.", "207" ], [ "GDP has been rising, the UK is not currently in recession, 2020 was absolutely a disaster of a year, but it included a quarter of record breaking losses and a quarter of record breaking gains. The UK is projected to grow this year, the pound is up against the dollar and the Euro.. The UK economy is still bigger than it was 5 years ago and there are countries that have seen bigger contractions. \n\nObviously we'll see where we are at the end of 2021, but the Covid impact is hardly a 'normal' recession in context.", "841" ], [ "Before the election? And I was very much paying attention, she wasn't part of the picture in the run up, she didn't take part in any of the discussions/debates and wasn't subject to any proper media scrutiny (outside of Germany, or EU related anyway) until essentially the point she was put forward by the council. And I say that as someone who watches the German news as much as anything else. \n\nThis wasn't some normal process similar to how PM's in the UK end up in post, and that's fine, the EU isn't a national government, it doesn't have the same powers as one and the roles of both its elected and unelected elements are different, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have a democratic deficit, and that some of the elements presented as democratic aren't essentially a veneer.", "437" ], [ "> No, the difference is that the UK doesn't use proportional representation so the issue of having a compromise candidate being chosen by MPs to be PM is unlikely as majorities are much much more likely.\n\nThe UK has had coalitions though, the outcome being the leader of the largest party still ending up as PM.\n\n > If Labour had 10-15 more seats in 2010 then we could get well have seen a directly parallel example with <PERSON> stepping down for a coalition with Lib Dems led by a Labour MP other than <PERSON> but that didn't materialise, the Lib Dems literally had it as a stipulation for potential coalition negotiations. \n\nPossibly, but I don't think so. Even at the time the discussion was not about picking some alternative Labour MP to lead (the only time I've seen that discussion play out was in the run up to 2019).\n\n > Given the ability of Lords to become PM as well, it's entirely possible that it could have been someone other than an MP.\n\nThat hasn't happened for a very, very long time though has it?", "207" ], [ "> What you are saying is inaccurate, as I never said the country is in recession, I’m saying that it is shrinking. You can go to the Office of National Statistics and see that what you are saying is inaccurate.\n\nExcept that right now it isn't (based on your link...) it's growing...\n\n > Year over year, GDP went from 544 billion in 4q 2019 to 504 billion in 4q 2020, with an 84.7% debt to GDP as of March 2020.\n\nThat just means that the UK economy hasn't recovered from the losses in Q2 2020 though doesn't it? It has grown since and is currently growing. Generally 'shrinking' would suggest that the trend is the UK economy becoming smaller, it isn't (and isn't projected to either). \n\n > While the GDP is on a growth trend through the end of the year the country still hasn’t recovered from the lockdowns, and the current numbers were taken during the holiday period where high commercial growth is to be expected. There are no current statistics for debt to GDP (read end of 2020) that I could find.\n\nNo, the country hasn't recovered from the incredibly harsh drop in GDP in early/mid 2020, but again, it is growing again. If you'd have said that the UK economy was smaller than it was in 2019 I'd agree with you, but it is not shrinking at the moment, nor is it expected to.\n\n > This means that, unlike other countries, we do not know what percentage of GDP is dependent on government stimulus.\n\nWe don't really know that for other countries either...\n\n > There is no current narrative that supports a climbing pound. In fact, the only narrative that makes sense is a climbing Yuan.\n\nOf course there is. There is a strong argument to be made that the pound is currently pretty solidly undervalued when compared to a basket of currencies that includes the Dollar and Euro, there is optimism around the vaccine roll out, and the uncertainty around brexit has slackened off. That makes the recent gains the pound is making against the euro and dollar (and the projections of continued strengthening over 2021) entirely reasonable.", "841" ], [ "> So far, but due to our political system coalitions are exceedingly rare and even rarer are post-election coalitions like the 2010-2015. Meanwhile, I'm not sure whether a single party grouping in the European Parliament has ever got a majority.\n\nI'm not sure how relevant that is, the issue on the EU side, that isn't reflected on the UK side is the expected outcome was simply set aside, after being hailed as a way of democratising the EU generally and commission specifically.\n\n > The discussion was about in a hypothetical Lib Dem-Labour coalition who would be the compromise PM, as it wasn't going to be <PERSON> or <PERSON> who stood as the \"candidates\" for PM in 2010.\n\nBut it's not a hypothetical discussion that was had, it seems to be something you are suggesting might have happened, while the issue the EU has just seen actually happened.\n\n > <PERSON>-Home in the 1960s, I personally wouldn't call that a very, very long time ago.\n\nFor what, three days? And again, it was a change in leadership not the outcome of an election.", "207" ], [ "> As I said, the friction is now permanent or until we end up in EFTA by another name. Labour's policy was/is to remain/join the SM/CU - see their manifesto.\n\n<PERSON> policy was a second referendum in the GE before we've left. Labour don't have a policy to rejoin or join the SM an/or CU at this point..\n\n > I'm not sure about your last statement - the popularity of the EU has never been higher across Europe - see polls.\n\nThe popularity of the EU in the UK isn't exactly massive though, rejoin has less support than remain did (and that's likely to fall). The EU as a political project has never been popular, things like the Euro are wildly unpopular.\n\n > Coming back to the fish - when the chief Brexit leader is claiming that the issues with fish is due to restaraunt in Europe - it does create a lot of contempt for <PERSON> - [_URL_0_](_URL_0_)\n\nHe said that reduced demand was compounding the issues.. Which is in line again with what is being see, there has been and continues to be a reduction in demand for fish (because of the various national lockdowns..), that isn't new, it has been a thing for a while.", "631" ], [ "There is a weird disconnect too, one of my other halfs siblings lives in a converted van, doing he whole vandweller thing (well, not so much with the pandemic, but still). Works well for them as they have a decent job, can work remove and get to travel all over the place. My daughters teacher touched on living in vehicles as part of their PHSE lessons a few months back and explained to a class of 13 year olds that it was illegal. When my daughter mentioned her uncle, the teacher doubled down and basically suggested that not having an address was illegal and that anyone who deliberately made a choice not to have an address was probably a criminal.\n\nI mean granted I probably wouldn't want to live permanently in a van (although some of the conversions are awesome and photos of waking up in different places around the country every other day are quite appealing), but the narriative around it and the level of misunderstanding is excessive.", "257" ], [ "**Sorry, your submission has been manually removed by a human!**\n\nSorry, your submission was deemed to lack content for the subreddit to discuss. But don't be dismayed!\n\nPlease consider finding an appropriate submission to fit your comment on. If to no avail, consider the use of the megathread, if available, or, another subreddit. Or expand on it a bit...\n\nIf you believe your content was infact worthwhile, discuss it with us in modmail and we can suggest how to make it better. Typically, this involves providing more information, detail, and/or talking points.\n\nYour submission may be better suited to another subreddit. This may be present in the flair text (top left of your submission title). If not, here are a few which may apply;\n\n- AskUK for general questions Brits may be able to answer\n\n- AskABrit for questions from tourists and others about the country, customs, norms, etc\n\n- AskReddit for questions which are better answered by any Redditor\n\n\nIf you believe your content was in fact worthwhile, discuss it with us in modmail and we can suggest how to make it better. Typically, this involves providing more information, detail, and/or talking points.\n\n\n*If you believe this message is posted in error, [message the /r/uk team](_URL_0_) and include a link to this post. Please don't do this lightly, we're very busy and have likely acted correctly.*", "804" ], [ "> There's a huge hidden demographic of people like us, because only the problematic communities get noticed. There's also loads of people living in anonymous white vans parked by city parks, supermarket carparks, and industrial estates.\n\nIt's one of those strange things where you only notice it when you know about it.. There are a couple who park up on a layby up near where I am semi-regularly, noticed the van for years (big old green German ex-work truck). It sort of clicked later that people were living in it.. \n\nI didn't go and knock on (As apparently that isn't a thing you should do I'm told..), but managed to have a chat with them when I saw them out and about and offered them use of my outdoor tap if they want water, so now I see them every few months when they are in the area. They get around a bit too by the sounds of it.", "125" ], [ "> The lockdowns were in place before January 1st though. \n\nAnd demand for fish was already down (and being reported on at various points see: [_URL_0_](_URL_0_))\n\n > And you would think that if there is less demand, then there should be less problems with transporting the fish - which is not what is happening.\n\nArguably it is. There are the additional issues with the new export systems, but the impact is arguably smaller than it would be were the volume of trade 'normal'. It's a double hit on exporters of seafood. Arguably that's true across a range of issues and may well end up mitigating the impact of the last minute agreement and rapid shift in rules around export with little prep time.\n\n", "110" ], [ "> If it's the case that MPs just vote with their party regardless, then I don't understand why we vote for people to represent us in the first place.\n\nThey don't though, there are rebellions, MP's do vote against their party positions and they also obviously discuss and debate (if they are good local MP's) the issues important to their constituents. At the end of the day they are accountable to their constituents in GE's and by-elections as they need their votes to be an MP, and they are accountable to the party they represent.", "207" ], [ "> People are making a killing on furlough right now and secretly working.\n\nIf they are 'secretly' working for their normal employer, then that's a breach of the rules. If they have found alternative work then that's (IIRC) within the rules, and obviously makes a fair bit of sense. They can't do their 'normal' job, may well lose it (far more likely to I'd have though...) and having additional work in play is not unreasonable.\n\nAt the end of the day this is a bit of a nightmare period, it's hard to say with any certainty what the right solution is, but providing support for people who cannot work their normal jobs seems reasonable, barring that group from working at all seems unreasonable.", "679" ], [ "It they can't do their 'normal' job, then I don't see why not. Furlough isn't a benefit its supposed to be about retaining jobs that would otherwise be lost, if they can't do their job and their employer has decided to furlough them (which costs the employer too) in order to retain them, then that would seem to fit. That they are also doing work on the side seems reasonable enough, if potentially not very equitable to people who are out of work and not on furlough. That is broadly how the scheme is supposed to work though.", "602" ], [ "There are going to be a fair number of people who will find it hard to make ends meet on just the furlough pay, some people with multiple jobs who have been furloughed from one and are WFH or just working for the other and so on too though.\n\nThere are going to be edge cases and it's not going to work perfectly, but I'm not sure that there is an easy way to both protect jobs (the positions..), protect people who can't work, and protect those who need to work.\n\nYou could have some sort of scale down (so you lose furlough pay in line with pay above your normal income or something..), but that'd be quite hard to rapidly implement too.", "479" ], [ "> What is the benefit of \"unemployment not exploding\" if it costs more, while the people still suffer from all the effects of being out of regular work?\n\nThe benefit is that people have more money to spend, and you don't kick off a recessionary spiral, the companies employing these people are more likely to survive and so when this rather abnormal situation starts to resolve itself it is easier to have things running again. Those that are out of work are still getting the same support that they would otherwise (as shit as that is..) with a bit of a top-up, and obviously with a slew of other measures in place around accommodation etc.. It's not ideal for anyone, but the furlough scheme had a set of aims it seems to be broadly achieving.\n\n > What advantage is gained by someone being paid £30k a year to sit at home not looking for work, instead of paying them £15k in benefits to sit at home and look for work?\n\nThe benefit is that they are being paid by an employer (who is getting a top-up from the government..) who will want them back when they can reopen/restart normal operations.\n\n > And, most importantly, why wasn't it important 12 months ago? Or 2 years? Or 10?\n\nBecause there is currently a massive pandemic, and this is a very abnormal situation where the Government outright banned a massive number of businesses from operating, largely those in the services sector (so the largest single portion of the UK economy...) and has put massive restrictions on both businesses and customers? It's a pretty unprecedented situation.\n\n > Furlough made a lot of sense during the first lockdown, and has made far less sense as time has gone on.\n\nIf it made sense during the first lock-down, why doesn't it make sense now?", "801" ], [ "> Because, as you have said, it was intended as an emergency. You don't just leave it in place, without changing anything.\n\nThe emergency hasn't ended though has it? And changes were made from the pre-October and then the November approach to the scheme (although nothing as drastic as some are suggesting in this thread).\n\n > Unless the real intent is to protect the precious middle classes from the horrors of life on benefits, which they have been more than content to allow others to suffer for years.\n\nThe intent is protect any number of people from losing their job end having to rely on benefits, as well as protecting business from having to lay off staff.. That is the point.. And it's hardly about the middle classes, it's about anyone who can't work. I don't know how it breaks down, but at least in my experience most of the people in solidly middle class roles appear to be working from home.. \n\n > Automation of jobs, was unprecedented, the consequences of climate change were unprecedented, \n\nAutomation has been an issue and led to employment changes constantly for the last century, its one of the reasons we no longer have typing pools and why the proportion of employment in agriculture and manufacturing is tiny now... In that sense, it isn't unexpected or unprecedented, nor was or is it an immediate shock, it was and continues to be a gradual change. The same goes for climate change.\n\n > yet not a single fuck was given while the people suffering were the poorest in society.\n\nYou think automation and climate change is only causing issues for the poorest in the UK? More to the point, governments have intervened repeatedly in those areas too, not in the same sort of extreme way as with this, but then again, this is as a result of a pandemic pushing the government to actively shut down large sections of the UK economy. It's not comparable.\n\nYou are treating it as though it were some sort of long term intervention designed to prop-up the middle classes, it's clearly not.. More to the point if you are really calling for it to be binned and have everyone on it be pushed on to UC (where their employer can't hold the position, or pull them back into work), you realise that (even setting aside the public health issues) will do more harm to the poorest in society than not too right?", "28" ], [ "It's really not that hard. There are two, separate issues that the fishing industry is having to deal with, one of them is lower demand. That has been hitting the fishing industry since March of last year and is related to the lockdowns and Covid.\n\nThe second issue is Brexit and the new, additional (and permanent..) friction in terms of meeting the paperwork requirements to export to the EU, and the regulatory checks on export. However at the moment that has been compounded by teething troubles, that is to say some exportes have not met the requirements or were unaware of what was required, creating unnecessary delays above and beyond the additional friction.\n\nDoes that make sense or are you still confused?", "631" ], [ "> Not if you raised unemployment benefit to the point where it isn't shit for anyone who ends up on it.\n\nHow does that solve any of the other issues this is intended to address though? I mean I agree with you, UC should be enough for someone to survive on sensibly, but the furlough scheme isn't an unemployment benefit and isn't intended to replace it.\n\n > If it wasn't punitive, then it wouldn't be an issue for people to end up on benefits. (And, for the record, putting people on \"furlough\" so they don't end up \"on benefits\" is like bringing in a \"purchase surcharge\" so you don't have to \"raise VAT\").\n\nOf course it would. Benefits are not going to be a wage substitute after all, and if instead of furlough people were dropped onto even a much more generous unemployment benefit the issue would still be that they no-longer had jobs (they can't just go back to them when their employers re-open), it means that they are still likely to have issues in maintaining things like rent payments, loan repayments and any other costs that someone on UC might drop. They may need to move out of more expensive rental accommodation etc.. It essentially creates a whole set of triggers that likely creates recessionary pressures (people spend less, so other businesses end up in the shit too, kicking off a wave of further job losses). \n\n > Any benefit to be gained by putting people on furlough will be equally beneficial to people being made unemployed.\n\nExcept that unemployed people don't have a job to go back to, which again, is the point, maintaining the jobs and trying not to nuke the economy beyond the point it already has been.\n\nYou'll get no argument from me that we need to do more around unemployment and the benefits system generally, but again, that's not what furlough is.", "683" ], [ "**Sorry, your submission has been manually removed by a human!**\n\nYour submission is better suited to another subreddit. This may be present in the flair text (top left of your submission title). If not, here are a few which may apply;\n\n- AskUK for general questions Brits may be able to answer\n\n- AskReddit for questions which are better answered by any Redditor\n\n- UKPersonalFinance for posts related to finance in the UK\n\n\n*If you believe this message is posted in error, [message the /r/uk team](_URL_0_) and include a link to this post. Please don't do this lightly, we're very busy and have likely acted correctly.*", "804" ], [ "No, the opposite, make sure that there is good access to job training, college education and healthcare to the point that it isn't a driver into the armed forces (I'm ex-Army btw..). There are benefits in terms of training, discipline, pensions and pay anyway obviously, but I found it strange working with US soldiers who didn't want to be soldiers, but were serving to be able to afford to do something else that would otherwise only be attainable to people who are well off.\n\nDon't get me wrong, in the current context that is better than nothing, but there has to be a better set up.", "798" ], [ "That's a bit bizarre. I can understand avoiding anything that might confuse a consumer into thinking something \\*is\\* a product, but where it is clear, and where it is sold either as a standalone or as an alternative to a dairy product it is pretty much just taking the piss. \n\nThe whole 'They would also be unable to use packaging designs that call to mind dairy products, such as yoghurt pots or milk cartons' would be odd too, given you have things like orange juice and soup using the same containers. It'd also be completely counterproductive to prevent producers from showing a climate impact (where that is accurate..) by comparing the carbon footprint of their products with dairy equivalents as that outright reduces customer information and so the ability to make an informed choice.\n\nI'd want to take a look at the proposed legislation first (although I've seen similar proposals in the past..), but if the article is even partly accurate then whatever the EU does, the UK really shouldn't follow suit.", "642" ], [ "> And yet the fishermen (who along with the customs agents were meant to be the biggest winners from this version of Brexit) are now complaining about Brexit.\n\nYes.. Because they are hitting issues with the new processes as well as there being additional friction, and the issues around covid..\n\n > Something tells me this does not have much to do with the \"restaurant closure\" BS.\n\nAnd yet restaurant closures have had a major impact on the prices of fish since March. It's almost as if there are a whole slew of factors in play.", "631" ], [ "> But it's not milk. Milk is specific a thing. You can't have almond milk because almonds are not mammals and don't produce milk. Almonds come from a plant.\n\nAnd no-one is confused about that, no-one is putting milk of magnesia on their cereal, no-one thinks almonds are a type of cow, coconut milk has been a thing since forever.. Formula milk might technically be milk, but it has been altered, should that be called something else too? What about coffee creamer? There isn't an issue here.\n\n > Would you call your car \"milk\"? No because it's a car. How about your shoe? No that's a shoe and not milk. How about a cabbage? That's not milk either.\n\nSure.. But we are talking about a slew of things that have pretty much always been called X milk, so there is no confusion, if anything if you suddenly have to call soya milk soya bean extract, you'd be causing confusion as people know it as 'milk'.\n\n > There are an almost infinite amount of things on this planet that are not milk - and only one that is. Don't confuse them.\n\nThere is no confusion though is there? That's sort of the point. These are alternatives to dairy, no one is selling them as just 'milk' either, they are all being sold as 'something milk' and have been for a long time.\n\n > Call it soaked almonds juice or something but not milk. Because it's not\n\nWhy? In terms of common usage, it's almond milk, that's what it's known as, there is no risk to consumers, consumers are not being misled..", "642" ], [ "> Why don't we just stop using names for things. Every thing is a thing so we only need the word \"thing\".\n\nBecause that'd make it hard to differentiate between things...\n\n > No confusion there and you will always get the name right, no matter what it is.\n\nBut you won't know what it is... See that's the exact opposite of the issue here, you know what milk is, it comes from cows/goats etc.., it comes in bottles/cartons marked 'milk'. But you also know what almond milk is, or what soy milk is, and if you don't, it helpfully tells you on the packaging. In fact in most cases it explicitly spells out that it is a dairy alternative!\n\nSee how the use of 'milk' in that context is not confusing? And how forcing a change in the language is actually worse for consumers given it requires you to rename a load of things that people already know about? Language is great, it's shaped by usage, almond milk, soy milk etc.. are all perfectly well understood, there is no issue to fix here.", "642" ], [ "No? Exporters would have to meet the EU's requirements when shipping goods to the EU, but not for the UK market. EU exporters would also have to meet the UK's requirements, although that'd be reasonably easy for them to do given the EU's requirements would likely still meet UK requirements anyway. The question would be whether using a new name would sell well in the UK.\n\nThat said, it's not as though a lot of goods aren't sold under different names in different EU member states as it is (although why catisfactions are sold as dreamies in the UK I'll never understand...).", "631" ], [ "> Oat milk producers aren't going to pack in tetra paks for the UK and other packaging for everyone else. \n\nDepends on their production line and the impact of changing packaging and the proportion of their production that goes to EU customers. More to the point, given this is intended to undermine the sale of non-dairy products, why would they make a move that harmed their sales in the UK if they didn't have to?\n\n > That would cost them so much more, and for what reason?\n\nIt likely wouldn't cost them very much more at all, if only because the UK market is pretty massive and there is still enough of an economy of scale to make it worth while.", "631" ], [ "The EU isn't some loose alliance of European nations, it isn't the only forum for European cooperation, nor is it responsible for peace in Europe, it is however a broad and deep a political union with an aim of becoming ever more integrated.\n\nIn that context, the UK, which has been on the periphery of the union, sceptical of its aims and not exactly supportive in any popular sense, is almost certainly better off as a partner to the EU rather than a member of a union that is not a good fit.\n\nIt's also a bit daft to suggest that WWII has been a driver in terms of Brexit, the same goes with the narriative around empire. They are both things I have largely seen pushed by those on the remain side that wanted to paint a picture of a UK that is so small to be insignificant and their opponents so deluded that they still think the UK is an empire.\n\nThe reality is of course that the UK is neither a superpower (or empire) but that it is also not insignificant by any stretch, the argument that the future rests with the EU would make more sense if other economic blocks looked anything like it. The UK will be absolutely fine outside of the EU, it will almost certainly look globally rather than regionally (that is certainly the apparent approach in terms of foreign policy and trade, and has always been the case in other areas of policy that it can now link back in to commercial and trade policy).\n\nThe point of Brexit is that the UK had to hand off significant control over its domestic market and legislation, as well as trade and a number of smaller areas to be used collectively as part of a union it did not feel particularly connected to. The obvious outcome of that is a feeling that the UK is not in control over its own destiny (and that its own governments are not in control, and so the electorate has less say). All of that is true, would you see the US enter into an economic block that could legislate for the US and cause the US to legislate, and indeed where a complete change in government couldn't lead to a major change in massive areas of governance?", "437" ], [ "Yeah it's daft. But it doesn't mean there aren't EU diplomats in the UK. More to the point the EU actually blocking vaccine exports to the UK would go well beyond the status accorded to any given diplomatic mission, the UK's actions could be seen as petty, if the threat implied in the article were to be realised that'd be a lot closer to hostile. In the context of UK/EU relations, certainly politically, it'd be pretty devastating, the UK press would (arguably rightly..) blame the EU for directly and deliberately contributing to deaths in the UK.", "374" ], [ "> The point of diplomatic immunity is to stop simple misunderstandings spiralling into serious conflict.\n\nIn context its to protect diplomats from the host state.. Not really an issue in context but you know..\n\n > If the UK had proper channels of communication with the EU it could just have sent the EU a list of where exactly it sourced all its AZ from vaccines and you wouldn’t have these allegations that the UK “stole” vaccines meant for the EU swirling around.\n\nThe UK does have proper channels of communication with the EU, I get the impression however that the EU hasn't actually asked anyone bar AZ about vaccine production and end destinations. \n\n", "374" ], [ "They've broadly failed as alternative currencies, the am was initially at least to facilitate exchange (Especially cross border..), the actual outcome has been pretty insane vulnerability and a fair number of practical bars to broad adoption. And he's right:\n\n*But he said that crypto-currencies in their current state were not likely to be the final settling point, as businesses, consumers and regulators would look for digital currencies which are stable, safe and well-designed before fully shifting away from traditional currencies like the pound and dollar.*\n\nThat's basically it isn't it? The lack of stability and regulation are a problem, we aren't there yet.", "1008" ], [ "> International imports and exports are often significant of a small business becoming incorporated though. \n\nHow are they relevant at all to the majority of small businesses being incorporated? The vast bulk of UK SME's don't export or import and provide services..\n\n > The glass ceiling just got lowered a little bit further.\n\nThere is a little bit more friction, yes.", "631" ], [ "I'd assume that somewhere in the chain of lookups that dnsmasq is doing, it is finding something equivalent to /etc/hosts that includes and entry for [<IP_ADDRESS>](_URL_0_) as an address for its hostname, and then providing that as the address.\n\nSo for example, the hosts file on my DNS server is:\n\n <IP_ADDRESS>       localhost \n <IP_ADDRESS>    dnsserver.mydomain dnsserver \n <IP_ADDRESS>    dnsserver.mydomain dnsserver \n <IP_ADDRESS>    dnsserver.mydomain dnsserver \n ...\n\nNote the absence of an entry as [<IP_ADDRESS>](_URL_0_) or [<IP_ADDRESS>](_URL_1_) (loopback..) for dnsserver.mydomain/dnsserver\n\nWhile on my laptop, my hosts file is:\n\n <IP_ADDRESS>       localhost \n <IP_ADDRESS>       ix.mydomain ix \n ...\n\nIf my laptop were the DNS server, it would inform clients that ix.mydomain or just ix had an address of [<IP_ADDRESS>](_URL_0_) as the lookup order tends to start with local ones (hosts, then locally defined addresses, then addresses from the DHCP database, then external lookups IIRC)", "963" ], [ "> It would be sufficient to enforce existing law, coupled with giving a bit more bite to some of the penalties - case in point being the fine awarded to _URL_0_ being 0.7% of its campaign funds (that we know about). Obviously this has to get through parliament.\n\nCompletely agree (and I'd love to see the EC with more teeth and find some solution around time limits - the obvious point there is that elections have to be final, you don't want long periods where people can challenge them..).\n\n > It's possible that you and I are closer than this thread would suggest, and I'd be interested to continue this exploration, but I fear the time investment is going to be too high. So I'll say thanks now and look forward to chatting again.\n\nHa, no drama. It might be interesting though and I have no issue responding over a period of days..", "736" ], [ "Odd.\n\nThe council decision specifies that the extension is only valid if we hold EU Parliament Elections (which we did..) and ratify the WA before the 22nd of May.\n\n(*\"This decision shall cease to apply on 31 May 2019 in the event that the United Kingdom has not held elections to the European Parliament in accordance with applicable Union law and has not ratified the Withdrawal Agreement by 22 May 2019.\"), Article 2 if you are wondering.\n\nGiven the UK has not ratified the Withdrawal Agreement, and didn't before the 22 May 2019, then surely the decision no-longer applies.. But the decision is the basis for the extension.\n\nHow does that work then?", "236" ], [ "> Process the applications in France, as they should be under EU law?\n\nWell yes, but that is something only the French can do.\n\n > By allowing the refugees to get to the UK, they reduce their costs (they don't have to provide for them while their claim is investigated, pay for the investigation, or pay to deport if the claim is unwarranted). \n\nCurrently the UK is paying for a reasonably large portion of that, presumably it'd stop. \n\n > The delays don't affect them unless they are severe enough to displace business, which is a very high threshold.\n\nThe delays would become significant if there is suddenly a massive security issue to manage. Throw in that the cost will fall predominantly on French firms and it becomes a political and economic cost.\n\n > Rotterdam / Zebrugge to Hull is an overnight journey rather than a couple of hours. \n\nThere are other French ports but yes, any longer routes will add costs, those costs will end up increasing the cost of anything transported via those routes, causing an increase in price relative to other goods..\n\n > There isn't really a short term option to replace Dover-Calais, so there are really no disincentives for France here.\n\nThere aren't, although displacement is still a thing, and fines will be likely.", "631" ], [ "You can pull the numbers yourself from [here](_URL_0_), there are 650 Seats in the commons, 7 are held by abstentionist MPs (Sinn Fein), and 4 by the Speaker and his deputies. That's 11 seats that essentially aren't relevant. And of course there is one seat vacant, decided by the by-election tomorrow.\n\nSo as of tomorrow (with the vacant seat no longer vacant..), there are 639 seats in Parliament that are relevant to a majority. The Tories need more than half of them, so 319.5 or better, as we can't have fractional seats that means 320 is a majority.. \n\nThe Tories currently have 311 seats outright, but one of them is held by a deputy speakers so only 310 that are of use to them. They also have the C & S agreement with the DUP and so have their 10 MP's. That means that the Tories have 320 of the 650 seats in Parliament, and all the other parties have 318 combined (plus one vacant seat!).\n\nIf the Tories lose, then they still have 320 seats, and the 'others' goes up by one from 318, leading to them having 319 seats combined. The Tories are left with a majority of 1. If the Tories win, then their total goes up to 321 seats (vs everyone else remaining on 318) and they have a majority of 3.", "207" ], [ "> The French are paying nothing to process asylum seekers, as they're just not doing it - they're allowing them to sit just outside the port, unregistered, repeatedly attempting to cross. \n\nThey are processing asylum seekers and repatriating them, they just aren't pushing it very hard. They have also repeatedly cleared the temporary camps. The French have been running repatriation flights since at least 2017, the UK has contributed to that..\n\n > The UK are paying a substantial amount of the security costs of Calais to reduce our processing costs, and every failure of that security costs the UK, not France.\n\nThe UK is also contributing to the security costs, but that't not all the UK is paying for or that the French are doing.\n\n > Our costs will only go up if security at Calais reduces (hence us picking up most of the bill), and the cost to the French stays the same or reduces.\n\nIt rather depends on what the response is. The biggest cost for the UK would be if the French simply allowed people to board Ferries at Calais unchecked, and the Ferry companies didn't act either. If that happens, the UK will end up in a position where it has to take action to limit the impact.If it doesn't, then there is a route through Europe to the UK without any barriers at all. The UK would almost certainly curtail Calais/Dover traffic at that point and that absolutely hurts France and the UK.", "631" ], [ "> Yeah so that's exactly what's going on. The problem I have now is that the edgerouter rewrites the /etc/hosts file and /etc/dnsmasq.conf at boot. I'm not sure how that's being done, but I can't simply edit the files to fix it.\n\nI have a similar issue with a NAS (although with a upsd configuration...) my temporary fix was to re-write the config with my config after a reboot... There should be various ways to achieve that via \n\nThat said, given this is pretty common networking kit and dnsmasq is presumably a common use case on then I'd find it odd that this wasn't fixable by some slightly more sane route. I take it now that you know what the issue is the ubiquity forums can't get you a little hardware specific support?", "685" ], [ "> Our \"democracy\" couldn't solve a simple problem and made us the laughing stock of the world. The job needs to get done.\n\nWe are a democracy, the electorate (and country more generally..) are split on a specific issue, the split is quite narrow (as seen from the referendum, a relatively small majority want the UK to leave the EU, a minority want the UK to remain). Parliament mirrors that split. As a result, it's quite hard for anyone to force anything through as such.\n\nHowever, Parliament have legislated to take us out of the EU, and we are going through that exit process. It is not, and should not be surprising that given the large amount (albeit minority..) support for remaining, that a concerted effort has been made in Parliament and generally to prevent it (presumably in the hope that there is a significant shift in public opinion).\n\nThat is our democracy working, it means that people have a say and see their views reflected by their representatives in Parliament. It doesn't mean we won't leave, it doesn't mean that one side or the other are being ignored, but it does mean that neither side can rapidly or easily simply do whatever they want.\n\nIn that context, what 'simple' solution is there for this 'simple' problem? \n\nAnd as an aside, the amount of disdain for democracy (when people feel it hasn't delivered for them) and the apparent confusion about what the implications of people having a say in their own futures means is far more problematic than any international perception.\n\nThe job is being done, there isn't an easy way through, mistakes are always going to be made in a complicated political process, they always are. But there is no easy or rapid solution or any way to guarantee that a fractured country, led by a minority government will be able to deliver anything quickly or clearly.\n\n*\"Edit - Failed to close a bracket..\"*", "564" ], [ "> I assume then that they were talking about in the event of a GE in which the deputies can vote, leaving the result at 320 to 321. Any idea if deputies can vote in anything other than forming a government? The wiki isn't very detailed\n\nI assume by GE you mean VONC? (they all get to vote in a GE, as they aren't MP's..) \n\nBy convention the speaker (or whoever is sitting in for them) would vote against a no-confidence motion if there happens to be a tie (so a VONC needs a majority without the speaker), and IIRC neither the speaker nor the deputies vote in VONCs. Indeed if you look at the confidence vote in May from January, they didn't.\n\n > Any idea if deputies can vote in anything other than forming a government? The wiki isn't very detailed\n\nAs I understand it they don't vote on partisan matters as a matter of convention, confidence votes are about as partisan as you can get. \n\nAs an aside, while the Governments majority would only be 1 if it loses, there are also several non-Tory MP's that are expected to vote with the Government (or just not with the opposition..) in various votes around either Brexit or a VONC, so even saying the Tories have a majority of 1 isn't really the whole story.\n\nOh and people suggesting that the potential <PERSON> (so <PERSON>..) by-election shifts this further away from the Tories, obviously it doesn't. As the seat isn't currently vacant, it's included in the 'not-Tory, not-abstaining' number now, when he steps down it becomes vacant (and so technically decreases the opposition numbers..) and is likely to be filled by a Lib-Dem (possibly Labour but I seriously doubt it..) MP who would also remain part of those 'not-Tory, not-abstaining' number.", "236" ], [ "> The Greek bailout could be viewed as altruistic or political or of economic benefit to Greece or some combination of all 3. \n\nIt could, but it could also be viewed as a self-serving move to limit contagion and protect Eurozone economies at the expense of Greek voters, leading to long term economic issues rather than a shorter, sharper shock.\n\nYou can find pretty serious criticism and caution from economists about the approach taken after all, and if you look at the investigative reporting from Germany outright condemnation of the approach taken as allowing Greece to suffer to protect European banks most exposed to the Greek economy.", "437" ], [ "It rained so hard here that the street (a 1 in 4 incline..) turned into a 2 inch deep, rapidly flowing river, there was enough water pressure to rock several of the cars, setting off car alarms..\n\nOn the plus side, the kids made full use of it and we aren't at risk of flooding, but I wouldn't have wanted to be living close to any of our local rivers when it was coming down.\n\nAs a side note, I had to drive north on Tuesday when we were having huge downpours interspersed with heavy rain and Christ that was a mess. I was on the M1, just before the junction with the M18 when it really started to come down, visibility dropped to a few dozen yards pretty much immediately, and even with my windscreen wipers on full I could only just about track the two cars in front of me (as they handily had their fogs on..).\n\nNow I figure most people would have the same reaction as I did (and as most other people did..), you slow down to a speed that means you can stop if something appears in front of you, you make sure your lights are on (fogs if visibility drops below about 100m) and move left if you can, maintain a decent stopping distance etc.. \n\nBut there are apparently a few very special people who think that stopping in the right hand lane is a good idea, there were a couple of cars that quite literally just stopped (leading to people having to dodge them as they appeared out of the murk). Still others who think that 90 is fine when you can't see and everyone else is doing 40/50..\n\nOh and then there are the really special people who drive grey cars and don't know where their headlight switch is, because there is nothing more fun than invisible traffic.", "449" ], [ "> Yup. Fixed it with \"set system ip override-hostname-ip x.x.x.x\". Thanks for the help, much appreciated.\n\nNo problem! \n\n > I briefly contemplated some kind of post boot script, but realized that was probably a rabbit hole I didn't need to go down since it would have to intelligent enough to adjust to changes in config from other sources, and I was able to google better with the new understanding.\n\nGood, I'd avoid that kind of kludge unless you have no other options (usually you solve issues and create new ones, or end up with odd outcomes when you hit any sort of edge cases), it works, but it's usually not a great idea.\n\n > The only thing that bugs me is that I don't know what else to do but set the router override ip to the one with the subnet for LAN2. ( x.x.2.1 ) So I'm not sure what the behavior is like on LAN1, but at this time, only my TV is on LAN1 so it's not a big deal.\n\nWell.... I just had a quick look at the config option you used to fix the issue and there is also [this](_URL_0_) that suggests you might be able to avoid elements of some configs from being overwritten, which in turn would give you a few additional options.", "685" ], [ "Some other [reporting](_URL_0_) - \n\n > Successive UK governments resisted changing the law, prompting a dispute with the European Court.\n\n > This ended in 2017 when voting rights were given to about 100 inmates in England and Wales released on \"temporary licence\".\n\n > Following devolution on the issue, Holyrood and the Scottish government became legally obliged to comply with the ECHR.\n\nThat's good overall I think, ensuring that prisoners have a say in society is pretty important since we expect them to reintegrate and they are subject (in a very real way..) to penalties for having not complied with societal norms..\n\nHowever it's also notable that the numbers are quite small..\n\n > It will allow prisoners who meet the wider franchise criteria, and who are serving sentences of 12 months or less, to register for a vote in the by-election in time for the 13 August deadline.\n\n > It is estimated the order will extend the franchise to fewer than five people.\n\nOh, and Tories being Tories:\n\n > However Scottish Conservative equalities spokeswoman <PERSON> criticised the move which \"sets precedent\", saying that prisoners did not \"deserve\" to vote in future elections.", "236" ], [ "I'll briefly repost what I posted last time this came up, because it's worth understanding the basis of the claims about the pound being overvalued:\n\nIt comes from [this](_URL_0_) IMF analysis from February 2015 that suggested the pound moderately overvalued, even after removing cyclical factors that are temporarily reducing the income and trade balances by somewhere in the region of 5-15%, and then again [this](_URL_1_) from June of the same year that increased the upper bound of the overvaluation (at least in part because, as you'll remember, the pound bounced to a high just before the referendum). \n\nThe response to that in purely valuation terms is that the pound has fallen by somewhere in the region of 23% since the high point, so if it was 20% overvalued, it'd now be 3% undervalued assuming nothing else had changed. Obviously things have changed, and there is a bit of a row as to whether the pound is mildly overvalued (due to underlying issues and the earlier overvaluation, or mildly undervalued due to downward pressure that doesn't reflect the economic reality of the UK economy...\n\nAs an aside, my view would be that it was overvalued in 2015, but that right now it'd be hard to properly value sterling given the political and economic uncertainty and the varying factors weighing on the UK economy. The trajectory is going to continue to be downward until we are in a position where confidence to invest in the UK returns and some sort of long term view of the UK's economic future can be projected without the 'will it/won't it' question around no-deal and brexit throwing very different potential outcomes into the mix.", "73" ], [ "Mostly it has come back stripped of context:\n\n\n*\"So I was a bit surprised to see that on August 1 the Danes joined several other European countries – France, Germany, Austria, Belgium – in imposing a ban on the niqab and the burka – those items of Muslim head-gear that obscure the female face. Already a fine of 1000 kroner – about £120 – has been imposed on a 28-year-old woman seen wearing a niqab in a shopping centre in the north eastern town of Horsholm. A scuffle broke out as someone tried to rip it off her head. There have been demonstrations, on both sides of the argument. What has happened, you may ask, to the Danish spirit of live and let live?*\"\n\n\"*If you tell me that the burka is oppressive, then I am with you. If you say that it is weird and bullying to expect women to cover their faces, then I totally agree – and I would add that I can find no scriptural authority for the practice in the Koran. I would go further and say that* ***it is absolutely ridiculous that people should choose to go around looking like letter boxes;*** *and I thoroughly dislike any attempt by any – invariably male – government to encourage such demonstrations of “modesty”, notably the extraordinary exhortations of President <PERSON> of Chechnya, who has told the men of his country to splat their women with paintballs if they fail to cover their heads.*\"", "972" ], [ "To add to what /u/OrangeInnards said, it also explicitly allows a no-deal with Parliamentary approval, doesn't change the issue that it only forces an extension and we still have legislation in place that takes us out of the EU and of course the A50 notification in with the EU.\n\nIt doesn't compel the PM to revoke as an alternate default for example, nor does it (or could it) require Parliament to accept a deal. And it doesn't do those things for obvious reasons, there may be a majority to avoid no-deal, but there isn't close to one to revoke or for the WA.", "236" ], [ "> The overall argument is not illogical, but undermining your point by using a childish remark like \"looking like letter boxes\" just screams \"this is all an excuse to express my racism under the guise of writing thinkpieces.\"\n\nIf you read most of his output it tends to wander into the provocative or the whimsical (often to the extent of losing his own argument), this fits with that. It doesn't really work as a dogwhistle, and frankly it doesn't fit with what we know of <PERSON> from his political history either.", "730" ], [ "> What makes you think we have the ability/leverage to secure a better deal than membership offers? They'd never agree to that since it would make leaving the EU more attractive than remaining\n\nIn a purely economic sense? There is no better deal than membership, there is no way to have fewer barriers to trade than exist within the single market.\n\nBut most people, myself included, didn't vote to leave the EU on the basis of the economic outcome..", "631" ], [ "> To me, it mostly seems like a useful way to suppress working poor voters.\n\nI'm not sure why it'd suppress working poor voters less than requiring ID, it doesn't cost anything to register, you can do it online, by post or in person and so on. In lots of countries you'd have to maintain your address on your ID to maintain your vote, in the UK you have to register to vote if you move, what's the difference? It's not like you need to register before every election or something.", "350" ], [ "I mean, the majority of the countries on that map aren't part of NATO, some of them are countries that NATO was set up to counter, or that NATO has taken action against at one point or another (often with a UN mandate..). Throw in that several of those countries do meet their NATO spending targets and also happen to be spending their share of the UN budget and you can probably see why this isn't the greatest argument out there.\n\nOh and that's before you get to the minor point that the 2% spending target (which I happen to agree with, the UK meets, but that should probably be capabilities based rather than funding..) isn't actually binding, there was a non-binding commitment for countries to work toward spending 2% on defence.", "124" ], [ "> So is the UN so what’s your point? \n\nSo is the UN what?\n\n > And besides, you guys were expected to increase your share based on the increase of your GDP but end up instead decreasing your share. How the hell does that work?\n\nThe UK increased it's defence expenditure in line with GDP, it hasn't decreased it dropped briefly after the financial crash (but then so did the UK's GDP) and it has been consistently above 2%.\n\n > Come on are your Europeans by nature hypocrites? \n\nI'm sure some are. But then surely the US failing to pay its UN dues falls into the same category doesn't it? Hard to criticise those European countries that fail to meet their commitments while failing to meet your own.\n\n > Or is your ego that important to you? Because you talk about it actually not being binding and yet you guys bring up the UN. Like there is something wrong with this picture. The UN... binding lol.\n\nAmusingly, the UN fee payments are binding as per Article 17 of the Charter of the United Nations that the US signed up to, the NATO targets are a target, there is no requirement to actually meet the 2% spending target in anything the countries that aren't meeting it signed up to.", "124" ], [ "> The UN as in the thing that every country breaking almost every \"binding rule\" in the book.\n\nGenerally countries don't break 'every binding rule in the book' though do they? Generally there are few binding rules, and on top of that the countries that determine whether there has been a breach and what consequences there might be tend to be fairly limited in their actions. But then that's what the UN is supposed to be isn't it? A vehicle for avoiding conflict?\n\n > I wasn't referring the UK. Especially sense the UK is one of the few members actually paying the 2%. I'm more referring to Germany. _URL_0_\n\n > I wasn't referring the UK. Especially sense the UK is one of the few members actually paying the 2%. I'm more referring to Germany. \n\nThen say what you mean, otherwise you just look silly.\n\n > I wasn't denying about us not spending our share in the UN. I was proving a point how much hypocrates you guys are. \n\nYou'll have to explain who 'you' is here. I'm a Brit, the UK seems to be meeting its NATO and UN commitments, is there a reason the US can't? The UK is also meeting its climate change obligations, the US dumped that, the UK is also meeting the terms of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the US binned that too... I don't think in that context that you have a lot of grounds to call me hypocritical. Or are you sort of vaguely lumping a continent together because that's somehow easier?\n\n > Americans by nature are the number one criticizers of the US. While Europeans love to feed their ego. But once facts come their way it hurts them like hell. And the downvotes prove that.\n\nReally? That doesn't seem to be the case here though does it...\n\n > And besides we have begun to have more negative feelings towards the UN.\n\nSuper, so take action on it, push for reform, leave... Of course the UN has served the US very well over the years, essentially this is domestic politics playing silly international games because it brushes against the US's ability to act unilaterally.\n\n > As I mentioned before, every country has broken almost every \"binding\" in the books. Let alone listen to what the UN has to say at all. But you guys won't admit that.\n\nAnd I pointed out that most of the rules countries break aren't binding. The interesting thing with sovereign states is that they don't like to bind themselves when they can avoid it, so you end up with agreements to make use of specific dispute resolution mechanisms, rather than outright bans (mostly).", "437" ], [ "> Oh they do break every rule in the book sweet summer child.\n\nThe key word you were looking for and missed was 'binding'.\n\n > Tell that to Rwanda and Bosnia. \n\nWhy would that change anything? The UN aims to avoid conflict and provide an alternative, it doesn't always achieve that, even less so when you are talking about either internal conflict or the division of states..\n\n > And the US and UK had to fix it because you guys just sat around while watching it unfold. And let's not even talk about the UN incompetence regarding their missions in both.\n\nThe UK is in Europe, and I'm in the UK, so who are the 'you guys' in context here?\n\n > Says the the person who brought up the UK even though they have been paying their share. \n\nI brought up the UK because they have been meeting their spending targets and meeting their UN payments... And because I'm in the UK.\n\n > And it isn't even just Germany. Spain and many other Western European countries have been backtracking their spendings. Nations even with a much smaller and weaker economies are paying more which is shameful.\n\nGreat, but the UK hasn't, nor has Poland..\n\n > Yes, just like the dealings of the UN, no?\n\nI'm talking about the UN so... Obviously?\n\n > Ok so why the fuck you guys bitching about our spendings towards the UN? You already whoring yourselves with our defence money going towards NATO so why complain? Every peacekeeping missions that you guys take part end up in humiliation. When these genocides happen the UN sits back and watches.\n\nAgain, I'm in the UK, the UK meets its NATO commitments, commits forces to peace keeping operations, and so on. And the UK also manages to meet its UN commitments, yet the US does not.\n\nAnd just to be clear, When these genocides happen the US sits back and watches too, everyone does unless there is a consensus and a will to take action.", "124" ], [ "> Ok so what I'm getting at is you are defending the UK because you are from the UK. That is fine. But I was talking about more of Europe in general.\n\nSo my point again is if the UK (and other European countries, albeit not Germany..) are able to both meet NATO spending targets and meet their UN obligations, but the US refuses to meet its UN obligations (binding at that, as per the UN charter) how is the US not at least as hypocritical as the likes of Germany. And why wouldn't the UK, or Poland be able to call out the US for that kind of approach. The same goes for the US's approach to meeting its climate change obligations, and the terms of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.\n\nThe US seems to be quite happy to ditch its obligations wherever it deems it useful for a domestic political audience, that really is hypocritical.\n\n > That would change everything. IF they haven't dealt with the most recent past genocides. What is its purpose for then? To just make statements?\n\nThe UN member states, and specifically the UNSC *are* the UN, you are talking about the UN like it is some external imposition, the UN failed miserably in Rwanda, the US shares that blame with every other UNSC member and involved member. The same goes for every single time the UN is prevented from acting (by say a veto), limited in its actions (because the TOR's are too narrow, or the ROE too constraining). \n\n > That is bullshit and you know it. \n\nHow is it bullshit? The UK has met its NATO commitments since NATO came into being, there were tens of thousands of UK troops in Germany for all of the cold war, UK defence expenditure was massive relative to its size, it has been involved in every NATO operation. It continues to meet its spending obligations and is going through a major modernisation programme (you'll note the aircraft carriers and submarines, and frigates, and new aircraft and new vehicles...). It also meets its UN commitments, engaging in operations and sitting on the UNSC. And it does so while meeting international climate targets and upholding its other international commitments.\n\n > You went from someone that has given pretty decent arguments to just adding your British ego. \n\nNo, I'm contrasting the UK with the US in this context.\n\n > And that is comes from that fact that right now your ego is what represents your country's fractured political climate right now. I had respect for you but what you are doing right now is making me think twice. Don't bring in your nationalistic ego into this conversation.\n\nSorry, your reply to 'if the UK can do it, why can't the US' is that the UK has a fractured political climate? I mean sure, democracy is messy at times, but that's why it works. But if in that fractured political climate the UK still manages to meet its commitments to the UN and NATO (oh and by the by, meets its ODA foreign Aid commitments too, the US doesn't come close), most of which are politically sensitive given domestic cuts what exactly is the US's excuse?\n\n > So you are proving my point about the UN. Good.\n\nMy point about the UN is that the US should either pay what it said it would, or work through some reform. It can only do what it is empowered, by its members, to do after all.", "124" ], [ "This is a bit odd in that regard, either everyone is wrong on what the 'plan' is, or <PERSON> thinks that most people don't know enough about how Parliament works that this doesn't matter. I suppose allowing the Lords to stop the bill would sort of eat into the narriative he is trying to spin around the People vs Parliament in much the same way that this bill passing squishes the whole 'coup' notion, and he'd have issues with the Lords being the vehicle used to stop the bill but still.", "236" ], [ "> We still use Imperial units for some things because every time somebody tries to change it the Daily Mail starts frothing at the mouth about the government wanting to imprison pub landlords and vegetable sellers.\n\nFor some things it makes sense because you are dealing with pre-metric (UK switch that is) stuff, so a vast number of houses were built using non-metric measures, which means they 'make sense' in imperial, but don't in metric (think the width of floor boards and joist separation for example). You can work in metric, but it's far easier working in the measurements that were built in.\n\nEssentially that should mean that people are familiar with both systems and we use metric by default wherever it makes sense (and keep moving in that direction where we can). \n\nMoving back to imperial is mad though, it'd be like trying to shift back to pre-decimal currency. It might help some people improve their maths (seriously, a lot of this thread seems to be more about people not able to manage fractions than anything else..) but it'd be a nightmare in every other sense.", "455" ], [ "> I allocated preferences based on who I felt those voters were more likely to support, it was fairly obvious most of the time.\n\nWhy would it be obvious?\n\nWith this it'd be useful to see the assumptions you made, ignoring the usual issues (that people would vote differently if systems were different..) you'd presumably have a hard time distributing second preferences from Labour given the variation in vote drivers, especially in 2017 and it'd get messy for swing voters and party members, not to mention the likelihood of quite a few voters not including a second preference.\n\nYou'd generally expect preference voting to be more proportional than FPTP, but obviously in this case it isn't (although that'll always be skewed if you do it properly, at the constituency level).", "207" ], [ "I think that's pretty problematic, even just in the context of where voters went and came from for parties like the Greens and UKIP, and certainly for both the Con/Labour assumption. \n\nAs interesting as it is, I'm not sure it really amounts to anything beyond pulling numbers out of the air.\n\nYou might get something with a notion of validity if you look at it at a constituency level and compare regional, local and EP voting patterns with national ones, exclude membership votes and 'core vote' figures (to ID people who won't offer a second preference) and adjust a preference for small parties (because it's almost certain that people are dissuaded from voting for small parties in a non-preference system). But even then it's still far to flaky. Maybe there is some polling that could be fed in, although if there is I haven't seen it.", "207" ], [ "People are really bad when it comes to temporary road closures.. Where I am, we've had rolling closures of a few major roads while the council have been doing major works, and the number of people who will stop and do u-turns (often really dodgy ones..) at the first 'Road Ahead Closed' signage, because there are cones and it's a big red sign is insane, the road continues, there are options to turn around, and a diversion but no, a 9 point turn next to a traffic island is what you decided was the best idea..", "523" ], [ "Just before I left school I had a job in retail (essentially stock and some till work in a reasonably larger chain), they'd do random security checks based on employee number, after a shift had finished. Now while it wasn't great feeling like the management suspected people of stealing, it was random (so didn't feel targeted) and more importantly it counted as another hour of work. I think the longest it ever took if you were the last person checked was about 20 minutes.\n\nThat said, the company did go bust about 5 years later and they had some pretty archaic practices (you'd get paid by cheque or cash rather than a direct payment, and you had to go and collect your pay & payslip from the manager in the office, it felt like something from the 1950's..).", "616" ], [ "> So when in real life people have heart attacks and strokes and remain conscious and lucid, they assume that's not what's actually happening to them.\n\nPretty much. My grandad drove himself to the doctor when he was having a heart attack, because he didn't realise he was having a heart attack. Sounds ludicrous in retrospect and obviously was potentially lethal, but it came down to not realising what was happening, and the symptoms not presenting anything like how they are portrayed in media, or matching what people would talk about.", "461" ], [ "I'm a leave voter. If you don't factor in inflation when graphing prices it becomes misleading quickly.. House prices outstripped inflation, so obviously an inflation adjusted series still shows a rise, but it also more clearly shows the fluctuations and keeps the pricing broadly comparable across the years.\n\n[See this for the inflation adjusted equivalent of what you posted..](_URL_0_)", "73" ], [ "> Burst came about to reduce training cost.\n\nThat's an interesting concept. In terms of controlled fire (up to and including automatic bursts..) I don't think I ever had real issues in being able to manage that personally or on a section basis, it's a massive training focus and pretty much all of the fire and manoeuvre drills do become incredibly ingrained (As does counting rounds fired for that matter...). And that's with rifles that didn't have a 'burst' option. \n\nI suppose it means that you can get fresh soldiers firing reasonable bursts from the outset rather than having to train to do it reliably, reducing range time.", "808" ], [ "> My tires still have plenty of tread, \n\nWhat is the tread depth? \n\nI'd expect tyres to last around 20k miles, a little less if you are on all-seasons or similar, but obviously if you use them hard it'd be less than that again. I don't tend to get 25k miles out of the tyres on my car between new and being below the legal minimums, I'm not sure why you'd expect to, especially if the car isn't being used for a large part of the year too.", "803" ], [ "The Treasury isn't independent of government, nor is it able to ignore legislation (quite rightly in both instances). Any objections are going to come from the courts and Parliament and the 'how' is pretty important there. \n\nSetting requirements for domestic ownership (as many countries do with various industries, notably airlines..) in order to maintain licenses and such is viable, but it has to be done in such a way that shareholders can exit in a reasonable manner - otherwise it does cause issues.\n\nWhether it's a sensible notion is another question again, but as with rail, doing something over time, and doing it in a sensible and planned manner should be viable.", "23" ], [ "It's not impossible to do something like this, although 'seizing' anything wouldn't work very well and leave the UK open to a slew of issues. Requiring domestic shareholding however is possible and can be done through regulation (and is done for a slew of industries by a large number of countries, including the US, and indeed blocks like the EU).\n\nThe 'How' is really important, but once you get beyond the notion of seizing anything it is entirely possible, the assets and services provided are, after all, in the UK and well within the reach of UK legislation.", "631" ], [ "I suppose the point would be that with the notable exception of the US, most of the rest of the western world, including most of the US's NATO allies would prefer to maintain the current agreement and pull Iran back into a more 'normal' state in terms of international relationships. In terms of the deal, the EU (including France, Germany and the UK) don't seem to feel that there is any particular need to increase sanctions or to unilaterally act against Iran at this point, and that again seems far more sensible than the US approach.\n\nThe US approach to Iran isn't working any more than the US's approach to Cuba did, indeed even with Iran being a real problem in the middle east, even with it acting as a state sponsor of terrorism and even with it being openly hostile to US and EU interests it seems to have managed to appear saner than the US in this area, because the US looked like it was arbitrarily trying to punish Iran rather than acting in response to something openly (the claims that Iran was somehow in breach of it's agreements turned into '<PERSON> doesn't like the deal that <PERSON> agreed, because <PERSON>'. \n\nThat's not a good look for the US, and frankly I'm sure Iran is enjoying that, it has after all damaged US soft power more than any number of other daft positions the US has taken over the last 2 years, including pulling out of the Paris agreements.", "985" ], [ "Not really no. Firstly, this sort of aid could fall foul of EU rules under certain circumstances but it is a loan guarantee so assuming that JLR are not facing financial difficulty, there are a set of rules that apply that would make this legal under EU state aid rules, specifically related to where states can provide a guarantee. Now it could be challenged, for example if it were determined that JLR wouldn't have been able to find this funding commercially, or that the government is offering better than commercial terms then it could still fall foul of the rules.\n\nGenerally the argument from Labour is that direct intervention isn't possible outside of a very tight set of rules, and that's accurate enough.", "236" ], [ "Go for direct to LAN then, it's the simplest approach and 99% of the time it just works. \n\nI have a print server that offers printing and scanning to the network across a couple of printers, but bar being able to shift stuff from one print queue to another a little bit of accounting (because the photo printer is expensive to run..) I think everything you might have traditionally wanted to use a print server for is available directly on modern printers these days anyway, up to and including printing when out directly from a mobile. The only other feature that I can think of that isn't is pooling them, but that doesn't sound like something you'd need and frankly while I use it I don't think I actually need it. I think once I replace my current photo printer (it's a great printer in terms of output, but the print server on it is flaky..) I'll switch mine.", "583" ], [ "It actually feels stressful.. I mean, anyone driving in a city is going to come across lots of stupid shit daily, mostly it's not actively dangerous and if you drive with a hint of caution you can avoid any issues, but I do find that mostly its not worth getting stressed over. Some of those went beyond minor though, the BMW pulling out was one (although at least they had the good grace to apologise via hazards..), the VW, while not dangerous for the cammer was pretty daft.. Some though (the first clip with cars already in the junction when the lights changed and so blocking it, the black fiat 500 (I think) moving slowly to park were non-events, and most of the rest were certainly minor..\n\nAlthough to be fair, a decent number of the clips on here seem to be incredibly minor and I do enjoy the OP's regular postings if only because it seems to indicate that W Yorkshire is a little bit worse than S Yorkshire..", "38" ], [ "If it's working when tethered and then continues to work via your normal network connection, then my thought would be a DNS issue (either on whatever you are using at home for DNS, or your ISP's DNS servers, or your configured ones.). If I were you, the next thing I'd try is changing the DNS settings on the machine you are using at home to say, googles ones (<IP_ADDRESS> & <IP_ADDRESS>) and see if you can access the site then.\n\nI'd really wouldn't expect your router to be the issue if you can continue to access the site after a first hit via a tethered connection, and your browser/machine is almost certainly caching DNS answers so that's where I'd start.\n\nIf that doesn't work though, I'll have a think.", "685" ], [ "UKIP post-referendum, BXP and the BNP amount to the right fringe though, not part of that mainstream right. In electoral terms BXP pulled in less votes than the Greens in 2019, the BNP a little over 500 votes total nationally and UKIP sat somewhere behind the Yorkshire party with 22k. There are factions within the right, we've seen that over Brexit, but there are fewer broad ideological fractures.\n\nThe right does splinter, but there is also more cohesion around a central block of positions, the left seems to splinter despite common aims because small shifts in position on specific policies create much more animosity.", "207" ], [ "> The UK gov will now claim ownership of it, having done literally nothing to get us to this point. :-(\n\nThat's not quite true is it? The UK Space Agency invested fairly heavily in Glasgow a few years ago and before that the Cubesat contracts went to Glasgow too, indeed Glasgow seems to have been part of that UK wide strategy for a while.", "74" ], [ "It's not to 'keep society running', it's to limit the massive harm that closing the schools does to children, especially from low income families and those that are vulnerable. The damage done is to the education and so prospects of this years year 9's, 11's and year 13's, it's already significant and sits along side of the health issues, the employment issues that they will walk into and the cumulative damage to everything from housing to social support that a decade of Tory government has done.", "762" ], [ "> And that isn't how people thought of it or it was presented at all.\n\nWhich? Voting reform or the EU?\n\n > The Lib Dems specifically call for STV [_URL_0_](_URL_0_)\n\nSure, but the Lib Dems also pushed AV (and AV+ IIRC) and obviously pushed an in/out referendum on EU membership too. I'd assume that they would support both moves toward PR and or a switch to some other (appropriate) approach that leads to a more proportional outcome in elections. \n\n > Which is why people should vote for parties that want it to make it an issue rather than voting for the same parties and expecting things to change by magic.\n\n As long as the major parties can ignore the issue (As they have done with electoral reform, or indeed things like the EU pre-referendum) or prevent it from being more relevant than their core issues they likely will. As long as voters feel that most of their core issues are being addressed they can relegate electoral reform to a nice to have once those core issues are covered. That is unless someone offers them a choice outside of the normal political discourse.", "564" ], [ "In terms of political parties you could argue it was incredibly stark, during the referendum the official party of the Greens, Labour, Lib Dems, Plaid Cymru, the SNP etc. were all remain, the Tories were Neutral (the Tory government officially remain). \n\nBut if you look at the party affiliation of voters in the actual referendum you have 58% of Tories, 37% of Labour, 30% of Lib Dems and 25% of Greens voting leave, and obviously a majority of voters over all voting leave, on an issue where opinion polling has always had significant portions of the country saying that they'd like to leave.\n\nHence a majority position that was very poorly represented in Parliament and in the normal political discourse, you could well argue that if Parliament were more representative that majority faction would have been far more able to push for an exit from the EU, and likely quite a lot earlier and it would have been harder for Parliamentary parties to effectively silence their own internal opposition in the way that they were able to in the two+ decades before 2010.", "564" ], [ "I tend to be pretty religious in moving right on the Autobahn even when driving quickly simply because you have to focus more on what's in front of you anyway, and it's not that uncommon for someone to be moving faster than you, even when you are really shifting. Obviously you need to move out again with a lot of time and be very aware of what is happening in front of whatever you are passing.\n\nGenerally I assume that if I'd have 30s or more in the right lane before needing to overtake again (I think the rule of thumb is 20s in the context of the Rechtsfahrgebot, although, in all honestly that feels too short when there is a bigger differential..), I'd move over. Depends on traffic of course and what I'm driving to a certain extent and I try not to completely take the piss in terms of speed differentials anyway (especially on 2 lane segments). \n\nAnd again, you'd have missed the bird (probably, unless it was trying to hit you....).", "523" ], [ "He's right though, the issues around NTB's is still extant, the issues within the EU around the impact that the committee structure has and the impact on the EP (as they are decision making bodies) as are issues around ratification for that matter. \n\nTake this view form [Agricultural producers in Canada](_URL_2_), the open letter referenced is here: [_URL_1_](_URL_0_)\n\n*However, CETA has now been in force for three years and it has failed to deliver on its promises for Canada’s agri-food exporters. This outcomes results from the EU Commission and EU member states continuing to impose a wide range of trade barriers for pork, beef, canola, sugar and grains, or failing to reduce those that were to be lowered or eliminated altogether through CETA. As an example, Italy’s country of origin labelling (COOL) regulation for pasta discriminates against Canadian wheat exports, is unquestionably offside from both the EU’s CETA commitments and EU law and present the danger of being replicated on other commodities and jurisdictions.*\n\nLets not pretend that this is an issue of Canadian businesses not being agile enough to make use of the agreement, it is at least in part the EU acting in a way that is counter to the agreement, both directly and in terms of the intentions.", "631" ], [ "> A rollover deal with Canada is an average deal for UK. The services are just a stub and Canada is unlikely to expand on that in a future revision.\n\nWhat are you basing that on? UK/Canada trade makes up the bulk of what was EU/Canada trade and most of the extant barriers (in both directions) in CETA are things that can be reduced in a UK/Canada agreement, given Canada's streght in agricultural exports and the closer compatibility of the UK/Canadian service sector (And that Canada already makes use of UK services..) there is a lot of scope for future revision, without a lot of the more contentious elements that the EU has to take into account to protect EU member states that more directly compete with Canada..\n\nAnd just for clarity, the UK and Canada are intending to negotiate a more advanced deal from next year: [_URL_0_](_URL_0_)", "631" ], [ "> It seems like damage limitation to me. \n\nPresumably because you do not see leaving the EU as a positive in the first place, which is fair enough, but it does ignore the foundation of why people voted leave.\n\n > Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like we have trade agreements with EU countries\n\nWe are no longer in a political and economic union with the EU, so we no longer share the same market. That is the point of leaving the EU though, to remove ourselves from that political union..\n\n > plus countries like Canada and so on.\n\nThe EU has a slew of trade agreements at various different levels that have been negotiated by the EU to benefit EU members generally. If the UK can maintain those to some degree and then (As it is doing with Canada) build on them by putting together agreements that more closely match the needs of both trading partners (and without having to protect 27 other economies), and the UK can tie its wider foreign policy into its trade policy, that's a step up.\n\n > We've lost all of those trade deals and this is just us not losing one of the deals, rather than gaining a new deal\n\nWhich is a positive, and a first step (among a few first steps) to detangle the UK from the EU while maintaining and then building on international relationships.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n", "631" ], [ "> The foundation was a protest vote, it's not more complex than that.\n\nNo, it really wasn't. Indeed that was at best a marginal issue. You might find [this](_URL_0_) useful in context, it covers the motivations for the leave vote (and remain vote) and the issues around how the sides see each other, essentially (as it says..) Leavers have a better understanding of Remainers’ motivations than vice versa and in the context of your comment, it would seem that you have a particularly poor understanding, but you aren't entirely alone in holding that misunderstanding. (And it's always nice to be able to help correct a misconception).\n\n > This is a very long winded way of saying that any deal we strike will just be damage limitation with the theoretical benefit that we could make deals that suit our economy more closely.\n\nNo, it's me saying that the immediate cost in terms of trade are more than balanced by the UK leaving the political union and puts the UK on a better path going forward than it is on as part of the EU.\n\n > Which I would agree is a genuine benefit, but it would mean we'd have to agree to most of the things we already agree to like freedom of movement etc.\n\nExcept we are currently negotiating an FTA with the EU that explicitly does not include the four freedoms (including FoM) nor being part of the political union or the wider integration..", "564" ], [ "> Will the UK be able to stand to the pressure to accept agricultural products from these countries though? That means, lower our standards?\n\nI don't see why the UK wouldn't be able to stand the pressure.. \n\n > The choice against factory-farmed, hormone treated beef and chlorine washed chicken is more on the realms of morality than science, \n\nAnimal welfare standards are however evidence based..\n\n > I believe. How does one square that in a trade deal?\n\nOne has the evidence available if there is a dispute.\n\n > Competition too, of course. If we want to keep better animal welfare standards (a moral option, not scientific) then we cannot compete with cheaper, but less ethical, production methods.\n\nTrue. But if we have decent domestic production standards there is no reason that we can't mandate them on imports. That way UK producers are not at a disadvantage in relation to foreign exporters, and foreign exporters have a level playing field in the UK.\n\nJust for clarity, the UK has higher animal welfare standards now than the EU (but with the single market and during the transition, no way of preventing imports from lower standard regimes).", "766" ], [ "> They asked people why they wanted to leave, they're hardly going to admit they just threw their toys out of the pram\n\nEspecially when they didn't...\n\n > As someone else noted the costs of us leaving have already exceeded the benefits of 20 years membership, that's not an insignificant amount\n\nOnly if you really fuck with the numbers ignore opportunity costs and don't ascribe costs to any of the things that EU membership required..\n\n > Any deal we strike with the eu that doesn't accept the four pillars will make us worse off than we currently are, every single economic forecast makes that prediction.\n\nIn terms of trade sure, it creates trade barriers that currently don't exist. But given the reasons people voted to leave and given that we do lots of things that we see as important, despite the economic impact, I'm not sure that's the only issue we should be looking at.", "564" ], [ "> They absolutely did. \n\nYou've got reams of evidence that indicates they very much didn't, including analysis around why there are misconceptions around how and why people voted and your arguments is essentially 'But I think they did because it fits my prejudices better'?\n\n > You're giving the electorate far too much credit if you think all those people who chose sovereignty know what sovereignty means, like the follow up should have been can you define sovereignty and i guarantee all of them would have said \"err like the queen is a sovereign or something..\"\n\nOdd, I spent a lot of time talking to remainers and leavers before the referendum, and almost all of them had a pretty good idea about what they thought about where control should lie. the 'Sovereignty' argument boiled down to where powers rested, who had control over or a significant say in various policy areas... This wasn't some mass of morons dribbling 'the Queen' into their pints..\n\n > Take it from an economist: the economy is the only reason anyone does anything. Everything else is secondary.\n\nSo food standards should be lowered to reduce prices then? The NHS privatised to generate a boost in GDP? Working standards cut and unions banned because lower costs for employers increase profitability? We can bin environmental regulations too presumably given that they create a short term cost (even if it avoids a long term one?). \n\nEconomics is absolutely relevant, it isn't the be all and end all. In the context of Brexit and the UK economy more generally, you can also point out that there has been a decoupling of growth from wages and living standards, so the risk of reduced growth is less critical for a lot of people..\n\n > When people can't feed their kids they're not going to be arsed about what court ruled on the maximum length of bananas. \n\nNo, but then it seems more likely that fewer people will have issues feeding their kids in the future than now, and I don't think anyone is particularly bothered about the length, shape or classification of Banana's, but quite a few are bothered that market regulation more generally is insulated from UK political opinion because it had been handed off to the EU.\n\n > If you genuinely believe people care more about courts of arbitration they didn't know existed until 5 years ago than they do about their real income decreasing you're very much mistaken\n\nI think people care about a whole slew of things, including the long term future of the country, it's not a one dimensional view of immediate benefit especially in the context of the EU where the benefit comes at both direct and opportunity cost.", "564" ], [ "> I really don't have time to argue this,\n\nSure, but can we at least agree that claiming evidence based approaches to assessing things like voter motivations are false when you don't particularly like the outcome is problematic? \n\nObviously when it comes to a referendum on a subjective political question, the reasons people vote will vary, but it is entirely possible to look at motivations in an evidenced way and polling is just that.\n\n > we'll see the outcome in a couple of weeks when you either begin denying you ever supported brexit or you begin the shift into blaming brown people for all our problems. They're the only two outcomes, you can believe what you want but its worth noting that anyone who's qualified believes you're wrong.\n\nSorry, are you now suggesting that despite advocating for the UK to leave the EU, the UK actually leaving the EU, and that having very little to do with 'brown people' in any sense, that there is going to be a sudden change of heart? This feels a lot like the post referendum rationalisation that has been bounding around for the last few years.\n\nShocking as it may be to you, but the aim that leave voters have is to take the UK out of the EU, that has been done. The next element for leavers (and remainers one would think) is discussing and advoacting for what the UK should do outside of the EU.. All in though I think you have an extremely flawed view of both leave support and probably the country in general. And frankly as an economist you should really reconsider some of the more absurd claims you appear keen on making.", "564" ], [ "> No the Lib Dems were offered a referendum on AV as part of a coalition agreement. That wasn't their policy.\n\nThey accepted it and ran with it though, which is reasonable enough given what they were aiming for, and that it's a compromise.\n\n > They didn't ignore the EU pre referendum you can't have a referendum if the Government is ignoring an issue. How do you see that choice happening.\n\nSuccessive governments ignored the EU as an issue, after the ERM crisis and <PERSON>'s 'Bastards' and then New Labour on it was ignored by everyone bar the hard left and the hard right as an issue. It took UKIP putting the issue into the frame for it to be politically relevant in the domestic discourse at all and to the point where the Tories felt it would be electorally useful to pursue. And even then you had a remain supporting PM assuming that he could use a 'reform' approach to get buy in and refused to seriously consider leaving being a likely outcome.. It was hubris on Camerons part, but it did give people a say on something they at they wanted a say on..", "564" ], [ "> They didn't ignore it they decided to stay in the EU.\n\nThey did ignore the issue, they avoided bringing it into the public discourse and treated it as though it were not open to discussion, never mind subject to change and as though the public had no say in what was a fairly major component of the UK's constitutional set-up. They did act to minimise the EU (both in terms of domestic politics and by aiming to keep the UK on the periphery of the EU where possible) and did so for more than two decades. The fact that the Tories were eventually pushed into offering a choice doesn't negate what came before.", "564" ], [ "Generally tweets are too short to be particularly useful in isolation, and where they link to a story or other larger bit of content that larger bit of content should be what is submitted, so that's something that mods could take into account. All in I'd normally be wary of banning any source directly, but frankly a lot of the tweets amount to outsourced editorialising most of the time anyway (tweets that pull sections from a poll, article, report or wider source with some opinion attached) and so could just be managed by applying the existing rules.\n\nI'd also sort of assume that Tweets that would otherwise break subreddit rules would be binned anyway..", "621" ], [ "> So prorogue of parliament and lying to the monarchy is perfectly acceptable?\n\nNo, it's not.. And the courts dealt with it, and it made absolutely no difference (as in Parliament didn't actually do anything with the extra time either..).\n\n > Oh no body, the French only closed all frieght for shits and giggles after he declared the navy would be keeping on eye on those notorious french fishermen.\n\nThey closed their borders temporarily due to COVID, the UK and France have an incredibly close defence relationship and good bilateral relationship though..\n\n > Not all conservatives are advocates of a smaller state, <PERSON> and the likes are more a diluted mix, the cabinet are by far the most extremity of the Tories.\n\n<PERSON> was a one-nation conservative so less extreme than <PERSON> in that regard but still pro-small state, in that context <PERSON> is closer to her than <PERSON> (and appears to take a less hard line approach elsewhere). The idea that <PERSON> was moderate (after her time as Home Sec) and <PERSON> is extreme doesn't really match up..\n\n > So, are you saying that <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON> do not use language to with the intent of stirring divisions that are inherently dangerous? Some politicians may use emotive language but saying \"drain the swap\" and \"take back control\" is only designed to create divisions, us and them if you will, an attack on white British people , their voting base.\n\nI think that they use language to pull in support, I'm not sure that 'take back control' is intended to stir divisions, and drain the swamp would be similar to the calls to end the revolving door between politicians and the private sector in the UK. <PERSON> really did push anti-black, pro-white narratives he made some outrageous statements from the podium, he implemented outright abusive policies and presided over abusive policing and so on.. That's nto really comparable.\n\n > I think you're been ridiculously naive especially when many UKIP, BNP ect voters voted for <PERSON>.\n\nAnd I think you are being insanely simplistic and have a massively skewed view of politics in the UK vs elsewhere.\n\n > A man who is on record saying <PERSON> should be nominated for Nobel peace prize,\n\nHe didn't say that though did he? He said that if he fixed the issues in North Korea and Iran that he'd be a contender.. That's pretty much correct isn't it? Except obviously <PERSON> didn't and couldn't have fixed the issues in North Korea and Iran.\n\n > But ya know, that's perfectly normal behaviour for an idiot like <PERSON>\n\nExcept, it's not something he did.", "236" ], [ "> Less so when you add friction to your biggest trading agreement. You are still running your race (ie in control of domestic policy), but you now have to start in a bathtub full of treacle.\n\nAgain, not really. The reason NTB's are a bigger barrier to trade and create more costs than tariffs and quotas is because NTB's hamer competitiveness and make trade less viable. If you apply that to broad market regulation, to service delivery within the UK (so what, 80% of the domestic economy, most of which does not export) it becomes a big thing. If you can reduce costs by a small amount for hair dressers you'll potentially see more of a return than a trade agreement with a small country for example..", "745" ], [ "> Trade isn’t a small component of the UK economy - it accounted for c60% of GDP in 2019. _URL_0_\n\nThat's total trade as a percentage of GDP (so all imports, plus exports as a proportion of total GDP), not economic activity. You'll be aware that the calculation for GDP includes net exports (exports, less imports...) for example. Most companies in the UK, most employers, most of the service industry does not export. Most economic activity is domestic, the gains to be had from trade are marginal compared to the gains to be had from domestic economic, industrial policy and indeed taxation..", "841" ], [ "> they dont fit the bill thats my point they werent a result of anything other than a collapse of the main parties a wider disenchantment with the political class they were created by the patronage and indeed came from that same class and the media which largely supports them. ems popular support engagement with the population is minimal as has been amply demonstrated throughout macrons rule\n\nBut again, they presented themselves in a manner aimed to appeal to a population that felt neglected by the political system in the face of the FN also pulling in support from marginalised voters..\n\nIsn't that exactly what we are talking about? Who the media supports is irrelevant, how well they actually deliver on engagement is irrelevant, they absolutely did try to pull in votes (and were somewhat successful in doing so..) on a very similar basis. You absolutely could argue that FN did the same but on a very different set of issues (much in the same way that the Tories, or BXP or UKIP pushed for a different set of neglected voters than Labour or the Greens do in the UK). \n\nYou said it yourself, they are a symptom of a wider disenchantment with the political class.", "365" ], [ "> GDP is a yardstick for economic activity \n\nIt is, but it's somewhat daft to take imports + exports (trade..) as a proportion of a calculation that already includes net exports (which is a negative..). Or to put it another way, if you removed imports and exports from the GDP calculation, GDP would be higher (as the UK is a net importer..).\n\n > When you say “most of the service industry don’t export”, what do you mean? The below is a list of the largest companies in UK plc ranked by Forbes. With the exception of the supermarkets, which ones of these don’t export either a good or a service?\n\nI mean that most services are not exported, the vast majority of UK services (by value, employees, and tax revenue) don't export.. Large companies (and certainly multinationals..) are likely to export but they make up a minority of the UK economy.. The UK exports more goods than it does services, services make up the bulk of the UK economy, most people are employed by small businesses (a proportion that gets quite a lot bigger if you only look at private sector employment too).", "841" ], [ "The aim of civil disobedience is, arguably, to get arrested, put pressure on the authorities and the court system and show that a lot of people believe that the Government (or the law, depending on the issue..) is wrong, the idea being that 'they can't jail all of us' and indeed that that becomes a catalyst for change.\n\nIts why the actions being taken are deliberately unlawful, the aim is to end up in court, to have that argument to apply that pressure and do so very, very visibly.", "733" ], [ "My point (and like you, I agree with their aims if not neccesarily their methods) is that the enforcement priorities are probably in the right place and arguably what XR would be looking for. Lockdown breaches are a bit of a difficult to compare to given the aim is to get broad compliance not punish transgressions as such - the police approach (or at least the previous one..) of educating and informing in the first instance and using fines and other measures as a follow up made a lot of sense..", "141" ], [ "> I think it’s interesting that you side stepped the question\n\nI didn't side step the question, of course there are large multinationals and large UK companies that export, they make up a small minority of all businesses though and represent a relatively small portion of economic activity generally.\n\n > Small service companies which you rightly say employ a lot of people, do not have the expertise to deal with the raft of regulations needed now. Many will just not bother.\n\nThe vast majority of small service companies didn't have the expertise or the desire to deal with it before hand, the single market in services was fractured in any case and obviously the vast majority service UK clients in a the UK market with no capacity to export.\n\n > Every single piece of credible impact analysis on brexit from the past 5 years states that the impact of a hard Brexit (like we’ve now got) will be negative for the economy. They only really differ on how negative the impact will be. Arguing otherwise as you’re trying to do now, just makes you look ill informed.\n\nNot at all. I agree with the modeled projections, but it's worth pointing out that they assume no government action to mitigate the impact and the impact itself is relatively small. Domestic policy tends to have a large impact than anything else, usually by a pretty large margin, tax changes, investment, market regulation, all have more of an impact than shifts in the openness of trade does (up to a point in terms of that friction). \n\nNone of those things are cost free in other contexts, but it is not unreasonable or unlikely that the UK can't make use of the policy areas it has regained to create a better economic outcome over the next decade than what would otherwise have been the case. The government could decide not to, could fuck it up, or could continue with their current trend of incompetence and just fail to do anything at all, but the opportunity really is there.", "631" ], [ "> Specifically interested in how being in the EU was stopping us taking it last year.\n\nThe UK was still part of the single market and customs union and bound by (most..) EU rules last year so that's what was stopping the UK making any changes at all.\n\nIn terms of opportunities, changes to VAT categories are pretty big ones in a domestic market context (you saw that with excise taxes while the UK was in the EU given that is, at the moment a national competency). The UK can now use VAT as a broader policy tool, potentially by adding additional categories (for say luxury or non-green items to dissuade purchases, or provide VAT reductions or exemptions to promote the purchase of a given good or service, whether to promote an activity or arguably support a sector). \n\nIf you want a really focused one then the UK could reverse the EU mandated October 2019 VAT changes when the VAT charged on Energy saving materials, including solar, rose from the reduced rate of 5% to the standard rate of 20%.\n\nMore broadly you have the various roll-over FTA negotiations that are likely to result in more specific UK FTA's with existing trading partners, the UK is likely to star making use of its own investment bank, the subsidy changes in agriculture will take effect, the UK's approach to state aid could potentially make a significant difference to developing industry sectors. More open regulation around biotech and fintech (well.. tech generally) is also likely to drive investment and activity.", "631" ], [ "And by Monday you can get on with Protesting the new government. I'd argue that's the kind of efficiency to strive for.\n\nAs an aside, the long transition thing feels odd from a UK context too, the results of an election are almost always immediate and there isn't a period of transition (the Shadow government thing helps obviously..) where the previous PM can act as though they haven't just lost an election.", "236" ], [ "That's a reasonable point to make, but I'm not sure it really makes that much of a difference. The UK essentially runs 650+ elections (often quite a lot more where you also have local/mayoral and other elections thrown in) and every single one of them is decided on the day, there is no transition period. There can, in theory (and it happened in 2010 for the first time in a long time), be a period where no government has been formed, but even that leaves the UK in a sort of caretaker mode, there aren't months where the government is deliberately run by those who lost the election.", "207" ], [ "To be fair, the first part of that thought is not unreasonable (I'm all good, my chances of it killing me are pretty small), the problem is that something that kills only a small proportion of a large population is still devastating in a public health and national context, and of course that if you can reduce that 'pretty small' still further (and so reduce the risk for other people..) you end up saving a lot of actual lives.\n\nHeart and circulatory deaths kill something like 170k people a year in the UK, if you could reduce that by 1% that's almost 5 people a day who are not dying who would otherwise be.. Small changes in that context save a lot of lives. Corona isn't that scary on an individual level (even in terms of long-covid) if you think about your individual risk (especially if you are younger, not in an at risk category etc..). \n\nOf course you can reduce that risk quite a bit by doing very minor things to protect yourself and others and, at a population level, even a moderately small individual risk adds up to being a massive tragedy very, very quickly. It's the one thing that really pisses me off about people not wearing masks (happily rare enough where I am..) or not taking sensible precautions, sure your risk is minimal, as is mine, but if we can reduce that risk it reduces the risk for others who face far greater consequences.", "912" ], [ "> The EU sets minimum on VAT, not maximum.\n\nThe EU sets both a minimum and a maximum, it also defines the categories where they haven't been grandfathered in. Changes are and can be agreed collectively, but unilateral action isn't generally a thing.\n\n > If you want to incentivise domestic greening (or anything really) this can be done via rebate / subsidy as they do in Germany (and we did in the UK).\n\nWhich are subject to EU state aid rules, can be argued to distort the single market (and so are open to challenge) and can now be done via VAT changes too..\n\n > The UK could have launched state owned “investment bank” inside the EU. Germany has the Landesbanken.\n\nIt absolutely could have (and did at various points..) but again subject to EU rules in terms of how it competes in the market and in terms of the objectives it can support..\n\n > FCA is already the benchmark regulator in fintech and harmonisation with the EU increases the size of the market.\n\nThe UK (and FCA) has had to fight pretty damn hard for that and had to compromise quite regularly, there has (and remains..) a tendency within the EU to push for regulation that is proactive and tighter than you might like for financial innovation. Not a bad thing in the context of 2008 if you assume that regulators aren't doing their job properly, but as you pointed out, the UK's FCA (and its predecessors have generally done a good job). Very specifically in a UK context there has been a push to taper regulatory requirements based on the size of a company (so giving newer, smaller, less risky forms more space to grow) and around making it more viable to provide and offer insurance (to meet regulatory requirements) for smaller firms.\n\n > bio / agritech I don’t know much about, but in a similar way to fintech, to be able to export there needs to be harmonisation of regs\n\nTo be able to export there needs to be compliance with the importers rules, those rules do not need to be applied to the UK domestic market and they need to be appropriate to manage risk, preferably not politicised and used to create barriers to entry. The UK lost a huge amount of biotech and agritech opportunity to the US because of the way the EU as a whole approached regulation (and continues to..), it effectively put the UK in a position where it could not benefit domestically or in terms of growth in something it was inarguably a world leader.", "631" ], [ "> If that was your intention, why didn't you say something like \"While that may be true, do you agree with that they are factual?\" or \"That may be true, but at least they are factual.\"?\n\nBecause I'm commenting on reddit and not defending a thesis? The contents of the article are true, the article (and most reporting..) has a bias, both of those elements are in the comment... Why you'd feel the need to dissect the language used sort of escapes me, but either way, it's a discussion about the article on a message board, I'm not sure what you'd be expecting..", "809" ], [ "> If the sentence \"It's broadly factual..\" is not properly adressing the quoted \"And the article is heavily biased\", do you think you should expect me to assume that your other sentences are reasonably constructed?\n\nWhy would it address it? If you said, 'your car is old' and I responded 'my car is fast..' would you assume that I was disputing that it was old, or would you assume that I was suggesting that age isn't the only relevant element? Doubly so if I addressed the point that the car is old, later in the same conversation....\n\nTo be honest, I'm not sure what your point is at this point, you didn't like the way I responded to the parent, fair enough.", "809" ], [ "Who, leave supporters generally? Of course people only live for a given length of time, but the assumption that new voters will be in favour of joining the EU is a push, the assumption that those who voted remain would support rejoining is also a push. Younger voters generally may well look at the EU more critically going forward anyway given it is hardly the most progressive or positive of institutions.", "564" ], [ "> Because I have seen other people in the past making the mistake of thinking that if something is factual it cannot be biased. Have you not seen that mistake been done before? If you have not, then it makes sense that you would not expect it to be able to be interpreted in that way.\n\nRight, but you read the whole comment not just that one little bit right? Which is why I touched on bias more broadly and why this article was hardly an egregious example of bias (and that bias can come in many ways, from selection to tone). \n\nIt feels like you've made a massive assumption based on one line in a comment and run with it for some reason..", "809" ], [ "It was a completely last minute decision, we normally host a party and set off some fireworks, but obviously not this year given everything, so we figured we might head out into the peak (so I didn't drink anything - nearly screwed that up when the mulled wine came out.) and then at about half eleven decided that it might be better to get somewhere high instead. Bundled everyone in the car and decided to head up to watch the fireworks. It was like a war kicking off over the midnlight period, but pretty damn awesome to watch and listen. \n\nWe were up there for about an hour and there must have been another three or four groups of people total so pretty quiet and easy to find a quiet place to watch from.\n\nAll in it was a pretty nice place to be at midnight.", "8" ], [ "> I have not met people before who reply in that manner without attempting to provide a counter-argument.\n\nOK. I can't really help you with that.\n\n > I stop and reply on the first part I find interesting. \n\nIs that not an insane way to reply to issues if you then find the bit you find relevant has been addressed later?\n\n > Reason being that it is usually pointless to read and discuss later parts if I already disagree with an earlier part.\n\nIsn't that the equivalent of reading the headline of an article and assuming you know what it's about? I mean that's utterly bizarre.\n\nIf it works for you then grand, but I can't quite see how it would... It seems like you'd miss the point of any discussion that is even marginally complex or nuanced.", "248" ], [ "> Based on my personal experience, it is very rare that the gain of later information offsets the waste of reading something when you already disagree with a prior part. You may have a different experience.\n\nDo you find it actively hard to read things you disagree with? More to the point, if you disagree with a position presented, doesn't it make more sense to read through any arguments made so that you are aware of them and just in case there is anything new that might challenge an existing position you have? \n\nIt almost seems like you'd be creating your own little bubble if stop reading when you disagree with something, and that you must have some really odd conversations is you always jump at the first point of disagreement and then ignore the rest...\n\n > Almost all news titles from serious newspapers make sense and don't contradict my expectations.\n\nThen you must be readint a very, very limited amount of news. I tend to look at anglosphere news sources and then French and German ones and I'd argue that most headlines are misleading. Bar AP and Reuters (who obviously aren't papers) who tend to be a tad more, but not uniformly, able to provide simple succinct headlines, almost every serious and non-serious paper out there creates headlines geared toward getting people to click through.\n\n > If a serious newspaper wrote \"<PERSON> has been shot dead\", I would expect it to be an article with information regarding how <PERSON> was killed through shooting. I.e. it is extremely rare that I disagree with the title of a serious newspaper.\n\nWhy would it be relevant if you agreed or disagreed with a headline though...? I mean, with an opinion piece sure, when it comes to outright news reporting there is generally nothing to agree or disagree with in terms of the news, at best you might disagree with the presentation (As with this article) or any slant applied..\n\nI mean, if the article were 'World Mourns as new US President is short dead', would you find that problematic or something to agree/disagree with? \n\nGiven the media landscape as it is now and frankly as it has been for decades, I'm somewhat confused about how you can feel informed at all if you skip anything that has something you disagree with in.", "67" ], [ "> All the data shows the under 50s want in and now even more so since the vote. The under 30s even more.\n\nYou'll have to source that data, the remain vs leave question isn't the same as the 'rejoin' one, I can't see rejoin getting close to 'remain' levels of support any time soon if ever.\n\n > There’s a clear trend and given the Eu looks like a progressive utopia next to the Tories (“let’s bring back the death penalty” <PERSON>, etc) I don’t expect it to change\n\nYou have to be kidding.. Have you seen the state of social progress across most of the EU? \n\nThe EU is as likely to slide to the right as anything else, and generally sits right of centre, if you think that the EU is going to look attractive on the basis of its pro-market, capitalist policies while it ignores fairly massive social issues and inequality, then I've got a bridge to sell you. \n\nThe Tories are bad, but they are pretty moderate by the current European standard (certainly not being significantly to the right of the French or German governments, never mind the Polish government. Throw in that the 'right' across most of Europe is significantly more reactionary than the UK's right and it gets messier still... Not to mention that the Tories are only one GE from being consigned to the bin and a UK Labour government is vastly more likely to be able to attract younger voters and just as unlikely to even hint at EU membership any time soon.", "564" ], [ "> In most cases they either keep on building the former statement which I already disagreed with or never later on present any elaboration of their arguments; in that sense you are an exception. It makes sense to in most cases already at the source intervene.\n\nHow would you know if you aren't reading the rest of a comment or argument? And as an aside, given I do tend to read and write reasonably long and complete responses on reddit, I'm not sure I'd agree with the premise that most cases people keep on building the former statement, even if they did, it's still usually worth looking how they construct their arguments..\n\n > For whether or not I stop to ask them regarding what they wrote (which is unrealistic for newspapers, but since it is a fictional case, I'll pretend as if I could), it matters whether or not I am disagreeing with them.\n\nWhy? Surely you'd read the article and then come to a conclusion based on that not the headline..", "414" ], [ "> Ican’t be arsed in all honesty. Its New Year’s Day and i’m watching <PERSON> but a quick google will find it for ya. Maybe try you gov or some shit.\n\nSo.. No then?\n\nEvery single poll on re-joining the EU has 'rejoin' falling below that of not joining, and most of it predates the current situation (with a deal agree). Even in that polling 'Join the EU' is a minority position for everyone over 35 (not 50..), it has a marginal majority in the under 25 age group, but nowhere near what the 'remain vs leave' position is in similar polling. That's based on the BMG polling for the Independent..\n\n > But to paint the Eu as a far right organisation in comparison to what we’re dealing with is kinda laughable honestly.\n\nI'm not painting it as far right... I'm saying that it is arguably centre-right, certainly economically, and a bit of a failure when it comes to social reform. It is reflective of its members after all, the vast majority of which are more socially conservative than the Tories.\n\n > Our “moderate” tory party has been purged and all that remains are yes men being fed bullshit by <PERSON> etc\n\n<PERSON> wasn't a Tory last time I checked, and the Tories aren't exactly politically distant from other European conservative/centre-right parties (many of which are in government) even in an international context they are closer to the likes of <PERSON> or indeed <PERSON> than anyone actually further to the right..", "365" ], [ "The UK legislating for it and UK courts being politically independent, and the UK regulator actually having teeth? IIRC the EU is currently still trying to get member states to comply with EU regs via infringement procedures, the UK was the first member state to implement most EU regs in this area.\n\nIt's generally pretty important for the UK to be, and be seen to be well regulated, it's one of the reasons the UK is as attractive as it is for business internationally.", "631" ], [ "> I have in the past and using statistical analysis to infer about future comments.\n\nHa, seriously, you are using statistical analysis to infer future comment content? That's laughably unlikely to the point of being almost absurd, if you are doing it it's hilarious that you'd take the time to given the alternative of just reading the comments or simply ignoring the posters, and if you are just claiming it it's a tad sad.\n\n > Thinking more about it, I would probably read it because I would think they are just joking if they are posting something that I don't agree with as the title. And to be more specific: the disagreement refers to something where one option is right and another is not; not a case of where the title is subjective and there is no right answer.\n\nBut you didn't read my comment, much as the parent didn't read the article and felt you could comment in an informed manner.. Now you are saying you would generally read the content? That's somewhat contradictory isn't it? \n\n > Since I can't recall ever reading a newspaper title from a serious newspaper I disagree with in that manner \n\nReally? What do you define as a 'serious newspaper'? Again, I read quite widely and I doubt that there would be a day where I wouldn't see at least a few headlines that are problematic or misleading at first glance, that'd be especially true when it came to politics, the economy and anything science related..\n > \nand the nature of newspapers is very different from the nature of reddit posts, I cannot use statistical reasoning from reddit to infer about newspapers.\n\nYou can't really use statistical reasoning from reddit about reddit posts either.\n\n > The inferrence only works for reddit posts and other types of posts where I do have sufficient amount of historical data.\n\nExcept again, you don't do you? The amount of analysis you'd have to do in terms of content would make it utterly pointless, it'd shift by subreddit and poster, time of day..", "247" ], [ "But that's not what they said is it? It was more:\n\n<PERSON> to UK: We'll supply you with the first 100 vaccines made in the UK.\n\nThree months later...\n\n<PERSON> to the EU: We'll supply you with the first 100 vaccines made in the EU.\n\nAZ makes 80 vaccines, 60 in the UK 20 in the EU. \n\nEU to the world: Yeah, we're thinking about taking your vaccines because it isn't fair that we aren't getting them, even though they weren't promised to us and we acted really late..", "374" ], [ "Not the OP, but from the link:\n\n***What does the study involve?***\n\n*If you choose to sign up, you will be contacted in a couple of weeks to take part in an initial 10-minute session, where you will complete questionnaires about your everyday thoughts, feelings and behaviours, and complete a brief online task.* \n\n*After approximately one week, you will be contacted via email to take part in a second, online session lasting 35-40 minutes, where you will once again complete a set of questionnaires and online tasks aimed to test how you recognise emotions of others from written text.*", "401" ], [ "> Food prices going up. \n\nFood prices are about as low as they've ever been, inflation is still absurdly low, including for food items.\n\n > Import costs being ridiculously high.\n\nImport costs aren't particularly high either (certainly not for the end customer), some elements of the cost of importing goods have increased (although that's been true for a little while), but it doesn't come close to being 'ridiculously' anything.\n\n > Many companies refusing to even ship to the UK.\n\nA very small number of companies refusing to ship to the UK, largely because they have to register for VAT..", "841" ], [ "> Really??\n\nYes?!\n\n > I disagree. It costs the taxpayer much more than you’d think to keep this worthless sack of human garbage alive and in prison. What’s the point?!\n\nThe point is that I don't think the state should kill people where it has other options and that when it starts to you end up with mistakes, but mistakes that you really can't mitigate, as the person who was subject to them is dead. The state shouldn't have the right to kill someone unless they pose an immediate threat, once you've arrested them, they aren't.", "178" ], [ "> Keeping people in prison is a complete waste of resources, and mistake are extremely unlikely to happen during this age of cameras and DNA testing etc etc.\n\nIt's not a waste of time, it means you don't kill them. Mistakes are also pretty common, even when it comes to CCTV and DNA testing, never mind issues around mitigation.\n\n > The state has the complete right to kill whoever disobeys the laws of that state, as it has been in most places for the last few thousands of years.\n\nNope, it doesn't, which is why the UK doesn't have the death penalty and has moved away from killing people for disobedience, Its unconscionable and unjustifiable at this point. If someone poses an immediate risk to someone then sure, beyond that? Nope.", "178" ], [ "> The question is whether such a huge achievement would convince Labour they can go it alone or whether it underlines the need for PR.\n\nIt's not even about convincing Labour that they can go it alone under FPTP, it's that looking at it purely from a political perspective, Labour will lose votes under PR and potentially split and so will end up having to put together fairly broad coalitions after any election, without much of a guarantee that those elections are more likely to lead to outcomes in which the remnant Labour party is part of any governing coalition. \n\nPR pretty much guarantees that we won't see a Labour government again. It does do the same to the Tories (although I'd assume to a lesser extent), but obviously that's not much of a consolation if you want a Labour manifesto implemented by a Labour government, rather than a Lib/Lab/Green government implementing a compromise manifesto.", "365" ], [ "> I’m sure if this vermin killed a member of your family you’d feel vastly different.\n\nI'm sure I'd want to see them dead, but I'm also pretty damn glad that it wouldn't be down to me.\n\n > Why do you care either way?!\n\nBecause it's the society that I'm part of, and when the state kills people, we are responsible for that.\n\n > It’s the same as killing rats, or taking out the rubbish when your house starts to smell. Some things are just necessary\n\nNope, it's not necessary, and it's killing a person, very much not the same as killing rats or taking out the rubbish. Which again, is why it's not a thing, and why capital punishment is not likely to make a comeback.", "528" ], [ "> he literally admitted to it. There you go. No possibility of any mistakes being made.\n\nPerhaps not in this case, but how many convictions have been overturned in the past because of false confessions, or where mentally ill people have copped to things they didn't do, or worse were coerced into it? Hardly unheard of. But in any case, the issue remains the same, it's not down to the state to kill people when there are better alternatives, and not killing someone is almost always a better alternative.\n\nBut what is it to you whether they are dead or alive in prison? At a certain point I get the impression that people are keen on the death penalty not because it is cheaper, or because it might bring closure to some families, but rather because they get some sort of weird jollies from the idea of people being killed on their behalf. I'd avoid that too, it's not very nice from a societal perspective.", "178" ], [ "It'd be funny if it were, but unfortunately not, they were pushing the whole 'taking a deep breath and holding it in before releasing it and letting out a cough' thing as a way to avoid contracting covid', and later they were pushing something about holding warm water in your mouth for a period to prevent covid infections etc.. I think basically they were things that help with colds/flu/coughs (in the sense that they can make you feel better if you are congested, not that they help with the underlying issue) but obviously don't protect you from anything, and it was shot through with abit of covid denial and other weirdness.\n\n*Edit: apparently I typed caught instead of coughed...*", "80" ], [ "The police that I've spoken over the last little while seem to be pretty good at making an assessment as to whether they need to go beyond the first three of the four 'E's that they are using (engate, educate, encourage, enforce IIRC.). That is to say that they'd almost always want to resolve an issue and push compliance short of making an arrest or similar (which isn't that different to how they approach most things, although ymmv depending on where you are, I suppose my local police may be feel that they have a lot more problematic stuff to deal with).\n\nThe notion that people are being arrested left and right, rather than generally being warned off seems to be a fairly narrow one after all, if anything a lot of the initial reporting on policing lockdown rules at this end was around the police being over-zealous, and then that calming down.", "141" ], [ "Depends a lot on where you ride and the speed differentials, I tend to find riding in town (sheffield, so not London..) far less of a problem, bar the tram lines anyway, than riding out in the peak, a car passing relatively close at 30mph when you are already aware of traffic, and feel like they are aware of you is relatively common, but usually not outright scary (or that dangerous as long as nothing else enters into the mis).\n\nIf I'm riding on a smaller road out in the peak and have traffic pass at the same sort of distance but at 50, and often with poor visibility forward (and less warning before they arrive behind..) it's a completely different thing. Same sort of goes when riding on dual carriageways around town where you have drivers either fail to give space or find themselves squeezed (and so take up more of the space that you want to keep yourself relatively safe...). \n\nThrow in the issues of riding over shitty road edges, sunken drains, tram lines and it can be pretty hairy.\n\nI'd say that I see the same when driving too, especially in the peak, especially on the snake. I know where I can overtake a car or bike on the snake and I'll almost always leave as much space as possible when I do, but you don't half see some stupidly close and fast passes on those roads or people who simply don't expect to have to leave space (or worse still, people who think that not passing a bike on a blind corner or on the crest of a hill is a silly idea and so instead overtake me in a car, and the bike on a blind corner or on the crest of a hill..).", "990" ], [ "> Proto fascist if you will. As in heading in that direction.. \n\nExcept they aren't are they? Or rather if the UK government are proto-fascists, then most the governments of European countries and indeed most developed western democracies are to.\n\n > Never said they were (although I understand how the sycophants might misconstrue my words to claim their faux outrage to cover up their erroneous perspective)\n\nAnd I didn't say you said they were. The issue I have (and you've clarified it nicely in the above) is that fascism actually means something, the Tories aren't fascists (on that we would seem to agree), but they aren't moving toward fascism, or proto-fascists either. \n\nAnd I'm also not sure what I'm supposed to be being sycophantic about, or how your words are being misconstrued (never mind any faux outrage). \n\nComments like yours above distort political discussion and understanding, they mislead and they create exactly the sort of toxic environment that makes it so hard to create change. If everyone you disagree with is moving toward fascism then what engagement is possible, and if you broaden your definition of proto-fascism to include the Tories then it is so broad that it can be used to smear almost anyone (hell, there have been people suggesting that <PERSON> might be a fascist because of his position on the spycops bill and because he is perceived to be more centre left..).\n\nIts daft and its wrong.", "112" ], [ "> This is what I expect from people defending the Tory government. \n\nAnd where did I do that exactly?\n\n > Complete dismissal and ignorance to the evil and threat they pose on the majority of the population, even if many can't comprehend it.\n\nAh, so it's something that only you and likeminded people can comprehend... And yes, I'm completely dismissing the notion that the Tories are proto-fascists, because they aren't. Not because I can't see it, but because fundamentally, they don't meet the definition and are not on their way to meeting it, or heading toward it or anything else. It's not a defensible position (which presumably is why you've gone with a misrepresentation of my position, and then a suggestion that others just can't see it).", "365" ], [ "> I think if you give them the choice of having a few years where the Conservatives go on a destructive fuck up which then requires Labour to try and put society back together again or never having to worry about society being fucked and in fact making it better progressively then they'll choose the latter.\n\nWhy would you never have to worry about society being fucked up though? The Lib/Con coalition was a pretty major fuck up, if we look at France, Germany, the Netherlands etc, and UK voting trends, we'd be as likely (if not more likely..) to see that sort of centre right coalition being the norm with less chance of a centre left coalition taking power (and arguably more of a risk of a centre left coalition having to include groups like the Lib Dems, preventing a reversal of some of those norms...).\n\n > There will of course be folk that don't like societies progress but they are increasingly dying out.\n\nI'm not sure what your point is there.. There isn't going to be some massive demographic shift (slow or fast..) that leads us to a point where the left or centre left would govern, we'd see the same rolling issues of people becoming more socially conservative as they get older (because society keeps moving forward there anyway..) but have fewer opportunities for Labour governments to make real and lasting change.", "365" ], [ "> Encourage... people to break the law by allowing high profile government advisors who have blatantly broken the law to get away scot free...?\n\nI think its 'Encourage people to comply with the rules'. The police generally won't take more serious action against someone because they have a higher profile either, so the question would be around what would happen to anyone else doing the same sort of thing at that point.", "314" ], [ "> They should have just fined the fucker, he can challenge it in court or just pay it.\n\nThey could have, but they weren't doing that in similar situations for others <PERSON>, that whole consistent approach thing seems to basically have been the reasoning for the approach taken. I'm reasonably happy with that, I'd rather the police treat people equally when it comes to enforcing the law. I'd expect the PM to have more backbone though and realise the damage done and take action.\n\n > That's what I expect from people in public life, I find it strange those who consider themselves more 'conservative' don't agree. Seems to me like rules should matter.\n\nRight, but we are talking about the police... The police should be consistent in their application of the rules, if they weren't being then I'd agree with you, since they seem to have been I can't quite get to the point of blaming the police. I mean from a personal responsibility perspective (and I think the Tories generally see that as a conservative value...) he should have resigned when it created an issue, and again, the PM should have done something, but the police? I'd rather they were apolitical and acted consistently.", "141" ], [ "> It’s almost as if the remainers... were right all along? \n\nOn what? The economic question. In some areas yeah, but then it's not as though leave voters weren't expecting costs in terms of UK/EU trade, the issue for remain was that the leave voters were happy to accept some level of trade friction and economic disruption to leave the economic and political union that is the EU.\n\n > How about it brexiteers, are you ready to admit the battle bus was a dog whistle to the worst in you and not a serious economic proposal?\n\nThe reasons why people voted leave have been bounced around again and again from the post-referendum polling, it would seem that the primary aims that leave voters gave for leaving the EU are broadly being met.", "564" ], [ "> Rubbish, I recall at the same time a guy was fined for going for a curry in Manchester and there were stories of fines for homeless people living on the street where I live.\n\nWhich aren't similar situations.. There were also all the stories of Derbyshire police taking the piss on exercise, and for a while taking an extreme interpretation of the rules, again, they were panned by the media, the public, the government and the college of policing.. Mostly however fines have been pretty rare, they seem to have defaulted to warnings except where people were either completely taking the piss or offering no reason at all for a breach of the rules. The absolute vast majority of outcomes have been a talking to.\n\n > The law was clearly broken, \n\nI'd say so, the police seem to agree, but they also seemed to think that the claim (he needed parental support for childcare?) was reasonable enough that he'd get a talking to rather than a fine. If that's how they'd have dealt with you or me in the same situation (which seems to be the case) then that seems reasonable.\n\n > the man was supposed to be setting an example, I couldn't give a fuck about consistency. \n\nIt doesn't matter whether you or I think he should be setting an example, it shouldn't matter to the police either, it should matter to the government (which is why he should have been sacked). And consistency matters, the police and courts should always be aiming for consistency, it's sort of fundamental to UK law.\n\n > He should be subject to the rules he had a hand in and justice should be seen to be done.\n\nYes, and by the sounds of it he was on the same basis as everyone else. He should however have been sacked and he did get (rightly) pilloried in the media.", "669" ], [ "> According to who?\n\n\nLooking at the main reasons leave voters gave for leaving? The big two of those seem to have been that voters didn’t want the EU to have any role in UK law-making and wanted the UK to regain control over EU immigration. That seems to have been met. The return of competencies (the sovereignty argument) is tied around that first point after all\n\n > I’m not going to lie, if you believed the Brexit hype you could just as easily be gaslighted into believing this is what you wanted all along or that what you wanted has been achieved even if it wasn’t. \n\nIt probably depends on what individual voters were voting on. I suppose the difficult part at the moment is still that remain voters have a poorer grasp of why leave voters voted leave than the reverse, and the confusion about remains argument on the economy not being what drove people to vote leave..\n\n > There’s also a layer of pride there that will stop most brexiteers from admitting they haven’t got what they wanted (imho it was mostly the prevention of Middle Eastern immigrants).\n\nExcept it wasn't 'mostly the prevention of Middle Eastern immigrants' was it? I mean come on... That seems to have been something that the remain side presented as a caricature of leave voters rather than a significant factor, indeed the remain side seem to have attracted as many of that the outright racists with the argument that EU membership means less non-white migration (a message that has weirdly become louder over the last few months..).", "564" ], [ "> Which aims?\n\nThe big two of those seem to have been that voters didn’t want the EU to have any role in UK law-making (so the return of competencies and the sovereignty argument and wanted the UK to regain control over EU immigration. Those seem to have been met. \n\n > Putting smaller companies out of business so they can be bought up by multinationals?\n\nThe fact that there would be economic disruption was pushed hard by remain and accepted by quite a few (if not all) advocating leave.\n\n > Applying to join CPTPP where we won't have a vote?\n\nIt's a trade agreement, it's not a political or economic union, so yes there was a lot of discussion about the UK being able to run an independent trade policy that would seem to fit.\n\n > Allowing millionaires like yourself to avoid EU tax laws?\n\nI'm a millionaire? And last I checked the UK has done a better and more comprehensive job or implementing the rules the EU is trying to put in place than the EU has.\n\n > Waving everyone through customs because our border control systems can't cope? Preventing British culture being showcased in Europe?\n\nErm..\n\n > Isolating ourselves on the world stage? Weakening the West's ability to stand up against China and Russia?\n\nThe UK isn't isolated and the EU seems to be doing a shitter job than the UK at standing up to Russia and China.", "631" ], [ "> Disagree, this weak sauce shite is exactly why we have 100k deaths.\n\nYou disagree with the policing approach or that most police interactions have been a talking to rather than a fine? The latter is simply a fact, you don't have to disagree with it. You might be right that enforcement of lockdown rules has contributed to poorer outcomes in terms of the covid response, but I'm not sure how that's relevant to the consistency of the police response.\n\n > That claim was utter bullshit, and even if it was true was not reasonable anyway.\n\nThe claim sounds like it was about right, whether it was reasonable or not seems to have been down to the police and does seem like it sits about where the police generally went with the words of advice rather than fines though. It's not a 'I wanted to ride my motorbike' or 'I'm going to my summer house' or even the 'I wasn't aware of a pandemic' bullshit. \n\n > This is why I can't be arsed... you give him the benefit of the doubt if you want. I'll tell you this though, I'd say the same for any adviser or MP and I don't believe you can say the same.\n\nI'm not the police, I'm saying that they gave him the benefit of the doubt roughly on a par with how they appear to be treating everyone else. And I'd say the same for any advisers, or MP or anyone else.. In fact that's my entire sodding argument.", "141" ], [ "> Indeed. Guess which part was the fuck up? Allowing the Tories close to power.\n\nRight.. But that's what you'd end up with again and again under PR too.. The Tories would likely be the largest centre right grouping, they'd be more likely to lead any coalition government than not.\n\n > There already is. I think it was YouGov that showed it was only the over 65s that voted Tory in a majority.\n\nI'm not sure that's really relevant in the context of a switch to PR.\n\n > This is a myth.\n\nNo it's really not... the point is that the notion of a 'conservative' view shifts as we see progress. People tend to end up with fairly rigid views by the time they hit 30-40, where those positions are overtaken by social progress they cease to be particularly progressive.. You can see that in the british attitudes study over a pretty long period.", "365" ], [ "> The Tories have nobody to govern with. I'd argue they only get anywhere near Government now because there is literally one party to vote for if you have any inklings of right wing views.\n\nOf course they do, the Lib Dems would still govern with them, the parties to their right that will likely see some uptick in support will likely govern with them, they'd end up being the largest party in a centre right grouping. \n\n > With regards to the demographic shift that's what I was referring to. The YouGov study showed that people aren't shifting to the Tories now as they get older. Therefore if folks views are entrenching then they are entrenching away from the Tories. You can't really blame them either. You may as well rebrand them as the Conservative and pensioner party.\n\nThe issue around that is that they aren't becoming more left wing either. The moment we have PR it'll all be about capturing that centre ground and building enough support out to the fringe. I can see that being harder for Labour than the Tories.", "365" ], [ "It is a caricature. And you might have had it said to you, but it's not exactly a mainstream view, indeed its pretty unacceptable and very much a minority position. It's also not exactly limited to leave voters. Racism and xenophobia are definitely issues in the UK, but hardly to the level you claim.\n\n > These people are the UK\n\nNo, they aren't.. Just as an aside, if you've ever lived abroad in say France or Germany you'll also be aware that racism and xenophobia are hardly limited to the UK and that if anything the UK tends to do far, far better than its peers.. The sort of comment that you are suggesting above I've heard outright in public in Germany with everyone nodding along, in the UK, anecdotally at least, it tends to be said in private because it is frowned upon.\n\n > Sorry if that shatters your world or something.\n\nOf course it doesn't given it's not particularly valid..", "579" ], [ "> Their response is not consistent, they have a mountain of evidence and they haven't done anything to enforce the law.\n\nWe have a mountain of evidence to suggest that they have taken the same approach to enforcement (with a few outliers that have been criticised) and that the response to <PERSON> appears to be consistent with that.\n\n > Further, we should be holding him to a higher standard due to his position.\n\nThe police shouldn't be, we should be (to be fair I think we are..), the PM should have too, it's a piss take that he wasn't fired.\n\n > It wasn't reasonable, he had the virus and travelled to an area of the country with few infections. No reasonable person could think that was reasonable and his excuses about his kid were pathetic.\n\nHe didn't actually have the virus did he? He was supposed to be self isolating because his other half had some symptoms and they decided (stupidly) to self-isolate with their parents so that they could look after their kid. I agree that it was wrong and broke the restrictions, and that he should have known better, but the police seem to have done what was expected at that point.\n\n > I don't buy it at all, and I find it highly suspicious that the police would.\n\nBut again, that's pretty much how the police have been reacting across the board. That might be an issue in and of itself, but beyond that?\n\nYou aren't asking for the law to be applied consistently, or for <PERSON> to be treated the same as anyone else, you appear to be asking for <PERSON> to be made an example of by the police.. I generally don't like that idea (its what the press are there for to a certain extent given he's a public figure, and not firing him was a fuck up by the PM), oh and politicising the police is generally not a positive in my book.", "141" ], [ "> The reason the economic argument didn't work is because sensible things like that wasn't what the leave voters cared about.\n\nIt'd because it didn't address the core concerns that leave voters had about the EU as an integrating political project. The EU was hardly popular beyond the economic, even among remain voters.\n\n > Insular xenophobic nonsense is what motivated leave voters. It's not confusing at all really.\n\nExcept we have polling to show what motivated leave voters (and indeed polling to show that remain voters have a really bad grasp of what leave voters were voting for).", "564" ], [ "> Maybe not in whatever polite society you live in where people don’t say it out loud, but as far as I’ve ever been made aware, it’s pretty wide spread.\n\nI live in Sheffield, I have colleagues and friends who voted leave and remain, I'm hardly in some sort of isolated bubble. And on that, racism and xenophobia are looked down upon by pretty much everyone I know whether they voted remain or leave.. \n\n > This is exactly the point and equally, it doesn’t mean the racism doesn’t exist or is in some way not the mainstream. It’s absolutely at least a solid 30% mainstream view give or take and other white supremacist or British exceptionalism adjacent views are even more mainstream than that even on the left wing.\n\nSo a minority of people are racist to some degree (and quite a few of them voted remain..).. People being driven to vote on that basis would also seem more marginal. I mean come on, there were remain people arguing that leaving the EU would increase non-white/muslim/etc.. migration.. And yet leave voters still seem to have voted leave. Could it be that the reasons that they stated, including migration rates rather than nationalities/ethnicities, might be more indicative?\n\n > Given the race baiting of the tabloid news it should be very clear to you that racism sells here and is by no means a minority viewpoint. The amount of opposition just to a the black power fist being in fireworks at New Years was ridiculous let alone the actually harmful headlines and outrage that gets thrown around on a daily basis.\n\nI'm not sure that indicates that racism is a majority position at all..\n\n > Polite middle class British people just don’t think they’re racist because they don’t say it in a blunt way. They live in the cushy world of “well that doesn’t happen here”. Yes it does. Yes it does. Saying it in private doesn’t make you not a racist.\n\nIt would seem that my little part of deprived Sheffield, well below average pay rates and shitty housing and education, large migrant populations and so on is significantly less racist than wherever you are where people are happily out and about being racist shits all the time.. And yes, saying it in private makes them just as racist, but it indicates that society is not particularly up for that. Christ, the most openly racist person I know is Polish and vehemently pro-EU (and yeah, that'll be an outlier, but it's pretty shocking sometimes).", "579" ], [ "> No we don't, there's loads of examples where people have been prosecuted with less evidence and for a less egregious breach including homeless people who had no choice but to be outside. He travelled knowing he had the virus, by his own admission.\n\nWe have a few examples where that is true, and there has been massive push back. We know that the police are stopping vastly more people than they are fining though, and where fines have been upheld we can see that the threshold has been quite high. \n\n > Your partisan justifications are pathetic.\n\nHow the fuck is this a partisan justification? Are you confusing me with a Tory?\n\n > I'm done with this, you're never changing my mind and clearly you'll defend the indefensible until you die.\n\nIt's not indefensible, demanding that the police act differently depending on someones job or position is pretty indefensible though.", "651" ], [ "> Having lived and studied in Sheffield, you are in a pretty isolated bubble. In my estimations it’s probably the friendliest city in the country and it doesn’t surprise me that people are at the very least less likely to be open about their reasons for voting leave or are less aware of the biases that drove them to. It’s a pretty solidly liberal or labour town. Hillsborough, pitsmoor etc. are pretty run down, wouldn’t run it by them about how they feel about the other side of town. Heeley probably has the largest Asian population, right?\n\nFor context I'm in Upperthorpe... Not sure about Heely having the largest Asian population though, I'd assume Pittsmore/Burngreave as well as the bits around Darnal, although Sheffield is relatively diverse anyway, if slightly 'enclavey' partially because of the student areas and cost disparity. Upperthorpe has a reasonably large Yemeni population but is pretty mixed. I work out toward Tinsley so.. Yeah. But I've also lived/worked in Salford, a couple of places in Hampshire, Durham, Derbyshire etc..\n\nI will say that small rural towns tend to get the closest to the sort of casual racism that feels pretty normal in Germany, the nastier racism that felt common in France seems less of a thing in the UK generally though. In terms of xenophobia, I did a fair bit of canvassing in and around Bury (manchester) and saw a lot of it, mostly people out of work, mostly people blaming Poles. Some of that was sort of understandable (Polish being a requirement for supervisory positions for example, houses being sold off as HMO's with huge numbers of EU migrants living in them, poor community integratin and social services etc.. being a driver). \n\n > I'm not going to say there weren’t other dupes in the leave campaign that were not racially charged and were instead simply economic or law related untruths. I’m also not going to say people that live in run down areas are a monolith.\n\nI think you are sort of missing that you don't have to have been duped to vote leave, it's not a case of 'stupid or racist', its a perfectly reasonable political position, it just isn't one you can justify on the basis of GDP growth or an immediate economic benefit. But then the leave campaign doesn't really seem to have done that anyway. It was essentially a remain argument that didn't land.\n\n > Certainly though, a relative of mine who lives out in Woodley east of Manchester, can’t stop thinking about how much whiter Hyde was 60 years ago.\n\nYeah, I've got a relative in Chorlton who takes the same position, staunch remainer though (was hoping to sell his house and retire to France, and somehow avoid capital gains tax along the way). \n\n > I think this mind set is far more common than city dwellers or suburb dwellers want to believe. Indeed the conversation where I confronted this point of view was in the cafe Nero on Ecclesall road, probably the most liberal end of Sheffield. Doesn’t mean that this conversation wouldn’t have felt different to have in the butty shop by the hillsborough Morrison’s or the spoons on the highstreet. I certainly think it would have felt different.\n\nI think it's less of a driver for most people though and a far smaller component in the leave vote than people are willing to accept. It's easy to call leave voters racist, but it doesn't really stack up. There are a fair few racists in the UK, a lot of them voted remain, on balance I'd assume more voted leave, but I'm not sure they voted leave (or remain..) because of a racists position. People really, really didn't like the EU as a political project, or in terms of EU legislation, FoM and so on.", "644" ], [ "Absolutely, the whole point in a democracy is that nothing is settled and that people have a say in how they are governed. And while I wouldn't be surprised if the Lib Dems push that way anyway (and likely the greens..) UKIP did show that a single issue party can be a catalyst (Especially if it can bring pressure to bear in unexpected places. Whether it works or not is a different question of course and under any circumstances it'd have a long road ahead of it. Simply getting rejoin support close to where remain support was will be incredibly hard.", "365" ], [ "> Because we could. \n\nThe could, to a limited degree on line with the UK's obligations as an EU member. People are right to say that the UK could have taken more action, but it's also fair to say that it'd have made very little difference to the actual outcome. On FoM, most EU nationals in the UK were exercising their treaty rights, there would have been no grounds to reject them (the tabloid press notions of people coming 'over here' to be on the dole, or get benefits not really making a lot of sense), and that's before we get into the issues around what action the UK could have taken and what broader impact that would have had.\n\n > Several countries in the EU have enacted border checks this year due to covid so there is already plenty of evidence that we could have border checks.\n\nIt's also worth pointing out that COVID (and to a certain extent the migration crisis) don't represent 'normal' action being taken, but rather special measures that have to be temporary and proportional. The UK was never in Schengen so had more scope for border controls, bit it still couldn't have just blocked entry to EU nationals arbitrarily, or created a different approach to immigration for EU nationals (as they rightly had rights under the EU treaties the UK signed up to).", "631" ], [ "I'm somewhat confused at how you've come to the conclusion that the UK 'gave away everything else' that isn't what the reporting on the agreement would suggest from either the EU or the UK. It seems like a reasonable balance has been struck and that the UK has managed to largely extract itself from the EU while mitigating a lot of the risk, the EU too has achieved most of what it was looking to achieve, while mitigating risk and ensuring that there are mechanisms in place for both the UK and EU to prevent future risks arising as a result of change..", "631" ], [ "No, it really wouldn't. This mitigates most of the risk (not all) while creating a fairly stable set of conditions for the UK to move forward with. It allows for further divergence if that makes sense for the UK (or the EU) and takes the UK out of pretty much all of the elements that were problematic in terms of EU membership.\n\nA no-deal exit would only have created additional costs without much in the way of a benefit short or long term. I can't think of a reasonable argument for a no-deal exit that isn't possible with this agreement in place (regardless of whether you were hoping for a future relationship with the EU that is closer or further apart..).", "631" ], [ "Sure, but again, the impact on the UK's service exports is pretty marginal precisely because the UK is competitive. There was a bigger risk in both import and export terms on goods. The UK's service industry isn't getting a great deal here (but we knew that 8 months ago when the TOR's were put together) but it's not about to take a hit either, and it does see potential gains simply because it sits outside of this agreement entirely and because the UK is outside of the SM and so the common commercial policy etc..", "631" ], [ "> Losing passporting rights for the whole services sector, \n\nLosing financial passporting will have something of an impact but its one that firms have been looking to mitigate fow a while now, it'll be fairly limited and while there will be some cost, it also shifts risk and while it creates a new barriers with the EU to some extent (we'll see what happens next) it also creates opportunity elsewhere. You'll note that it's been fairly quiet around this issue even when it was clear that it wouldn't be part of this agreement.\n\n > as well as having to pay VAT based on the country they sell the service to, will affect the service sector a lot though.\n\nThat's much less of a factor, it creates a somewhat minor additional administrative hurdle, but that's about it (and there are already a fair few administrative hurdles, even in an EU context given the fragmentation within the single market for services). It's additional work, but even for small firms, a very small amount. And of course it only impacts a very, very small subset of the services sector that actually exports at all.", "631" ], [ "> We’ll see in a month or two. Odds are that the British service sector will have the same issues as dittos in other third nations to the union, and that business will start to shift to within the EU.\n\nBut that isn't what we see in terms of services with other non-EU countries is it? And again, especially with financial services, those moves have been made in the last 8 months precisely because we already knew it was out of scope for a UK/EU FTA. There isn't likely to be significant movement at this point within that set (And the movement we have seen so far has been fairly small and largely administrative). You'll also note that there has been movement in both directions (because the barriers are not one way, even if the UK has been broadly more accomodating, precisely because it sees it as a benefit rather than a cost..). \n\nBut yes, lets have a look in a couple of months, it's pretty reasonable to assume that compared to where we are now (or where we were three months ago) very little will have changed at all.", "631" ], [ "The response you received is somewhat flippant, but it's not far off. You can do several things to increase capacity for covid patients, cancelling elective procedures is one, shifting non-elective, and less time critical work is another. If pressure continued to build, you can take more extraordinary steps like activating this sort of additional physical capacity and spreading staffing more thinly to do so. Obviously each step has an additional cost (often long term) but the theory is that the cost is lower than not taking the step.\n\nIt's good that this capacity exists but also reasonably good that it hasn't been used up to this point.", "237" ], [ "I can't read the article as it's behind the Times paywall, so apologies if this is already covered in the article.\n\nIn addition to your point, the UK also sequences a far higher proportion of it's documented cases than most countries, currently it sits at around 7.4% of its more than 2 million documented cases, that means proportionally only 8 countries sequence more, in absolute terms the UK is responsible for a large chunk of all the sequencing and analysis being done. To compare it to the US (because the US also has a lot of cases, and is a well developed country with decent scientific and medical capacity..) the UK has sequenced around 150k samples, the US on the other hand (with far more cases) has only sequenced around 50k.\n\nThat should make tracking changes more possible for the UK (which is a good thing from a surveillance perspective) but also means that it's more likely to see, report and potentially act (where there is a need) on anything identified by that.", "519" ], [ "Why? If the UK pursues CPTPP membership and aims to build on a global (rather than regional) approach to services then that's progress without looking back to the EU as a route forward.. The issue with the EU is that it is a much broader and much deeper relationship than most, it is a political and economic union. There is still a lot that can be done (arguably can only be done) outside of a the EU as a regional approach.\n\nMore to the point, if you take the point being made:\n\n*\"The idea that the treaty we're about to get is the end of this is simply incorrect.*\n\n*\"Everything in the world is dynamic. It doesn't stop. The EU is going to develop, the United Kingdom is going to develop in various directions - how exactly, we can't predict.*\n\n*\"But the geography isn't going to change. The geography is that we are a European nation. We might be an offshore island but we are part of a European cultural, political, and economic space and that is going to continue.\"*\n\nThe first two are a given, countries relationships continue to change. CETA isn't some end point for EU/Canada relations, the EU/Japan agreement isn't the end point for that pairing. No trade agreement, or bilateral is the end point (you could argue that even things like the Acts of Union have developed with devolution and could develop further if Scotland pushes for independence...). Things always change, the question is how, there is no default direction, certainly not a default toward European integration in the EU.\n\nWhich takes us to the last part of that quote. He's right, Geography isn't going to change and the UK is a European nation (geographically and culturally as much as any other is). That doesn't however imply that regionalism and a political union within Europe as the EU is any more likely than a close partnership, or even divergence. If the last few hundred years have shown us anything, it's pretty clear that there isn't some inevitable path toward European integration or any given model that is guaranteed to work.\n\nEven the EU isn't a finished thing, it is constantly changing and will continue to develop.. I'd hope no-one is looking for something akin to a final relationship with the EU that never changes, it wouldn't make sense (given the UK, EU and world will change...).", "631" ], [ "> ok but what about the gov ability to send back people that have no jobs after 3-6 months? it’s up to the eu member state to act on this, the rules are there to follow.\n\nThat is one of the tools they could have made more use of, but it would have made almost no difference as very, very few EU nationals come to the UK and don't get jobs (or are exercising their treaty rights in some other way).\n\n > if they work and they pay their taxes i fail to see why an eu citizen is worse than a british citizen.\n\nNor do I, but those people concerned about the levels of migration from the EU, the lack of control over that migration and so on did see an issue.", "631" ], [ "The issue is that it's incredibly hard at the best of times to compare the impact of different regulatory regimes, someone who has been talking about 'red white and blue' tape for months isn't really analysing anything, they are presenting a consistent narriative. \n\nIt's not an informed view at that point, it's a continuation of a previous opinion, it's not some helpful new bit of analysis that gives you an idea of what the impact of this deal is, it's just additional noise pushed out within what amounts to an echo chamber.\n\n > They might just be biased (your implied rationale) but they might also just be right. Or they might be both.\n\nThey are almost certainly biased, and they are almost certainly correct if they mean that the bureaucracy around trade will now stem from the UK rather than the EU to some degree. It just isn't sensible analysis and you could have gotten the same message at any point in the last few years from an informed person or an uninformed one.\n\nWhat it absolutely doesn't do however is tell you anything useful about what the agreement actually means. It's 'take back control' level of messaging.", "631" ], [ "Do you really think that the Tories sit around scheming to make things worse? In my view their ideology is wrong and won't achieve what they want and I think that we need to be more collectivist, we need to support each other more and that growth should be balanced with everything else a society needs. But I also think that the Tories do believe that what they are pushing will lead to a better society via a different approach, the reason I vote Labour is that I think Labour is more likely to achieve a better society, not that the Tories are actively trying to do the opposite.", "365" ], [ "No, I just can't accept that. Neither <PERSON> to the Cabinet Office, nor Chief Mouser of HM Treasury at Whitehall are positions that get handed down to descendents, the various post office mousers are not simply bred.. of the office holders.. New candidates are selected and appointed as required. Anything else is madness.", "305" ], [ "> Brexit is to a certain extent a known quantity. Economists know that freedom of movement will end, x industry has moved or is looking at moving to the continent, border checks will need to be implemented, certain regulations and programs will change etc. from which they can derive predictions. \n\nThose projections were also based on a baseline (non-Brexiting) UK model and had to assume essentially no mitigation (beyond the deal scenarios). It's as problematic with as much variation, and it was pushed out long term largely because the short term costs are variable.\n\nIt's not unreasonable to make long term projections (around brexit, or in this instance) as long as we also take into account that they are almost always wrong even when they have large error bars, and that any unexpected event (covid now, but it could be anything even much less serious events) can significantly shift the trajectory.", "631" ], [ "That'd potentially be counter-productive for the UK as any rapid/last minute agreement with <PERSON>'s name attached would potentially be politically problematic (in the UK as much as the US). It'd make far more sense to wait until <PERSON> is in and see what can be done before the TPA is due to expire.\n\nI mean the government, and <PERSON> specifically have been hammered pretty hard with even fairly notional links to <PERSON>, a US/UK mini-deal with <PERSON> signature on would just feed into that.", "236" ], [ "> London is going to lose clearing house status for the euro soon, and that will be catastrophic for the UK financial market.\n\nIt almost certainly isn't, because there is no sensible alternative (certainly not within the EU), it's also only a small portion of what London does. The EU may try to fragment it, but that just increases costs for EU businesses and makes the Euro less attractive. London is a global financial centre, the next biggest in Europe is Geneva (also not in the EU..), Frankfurt, Paris, Amsterdam etc don't play in the same league and won't unless something fundamentally changes within both the EU and national approaches to governance.", "631" ], [ "> Nope. We had alignment and control over one of the biggest markets in the world, with enough clout to influence global standards. Now we're a rule taker, because divergence means tariffs.\n\nThe UK had a say in how the EU operated, it didn't have control (hence the single market in services still being fragmented and the UK being on the periphery of the EU to a large extent). The UK isn't a 'rule taker' based on this agreement either, or if it is, it is as much of one as the US or Japan are, and obviously the EU also has to comply with UK rules or both risk more friction.\n\n > We left last year, this was to stop a catastrophic outcome for all parties, and mainly UK focused member states. The EU looks out for its members' interests, it's why it was set up, that was the entire point.\n\nThe EU did spend rather a lot of time assuming that the UK would seek a far closer agreement than it did (despite what the UK had said..). There was also an early assumption that the UK might not leave (Although that hasn't been true for a while). The EU is looking out for its members interests, but it does have to balance them because they do not align perfectly.\n\n > Yeah, this is one of those talking point that seems to wander about without realising the difference between contributions, and the wholistic impact of the entire arrangement. \n\nIt was misunderstood by people on both sides. It's hard to actually calculate the benefit that the EU provides to the UK in terms of GDP growth (the UK trades as much outside the EU as it does within, is a net importer of EU goods etc..). The EU benefits different members differently and the UK was both a net contributor and benefited less from many areas of the EU (like institutional stability etc..), while also losing opportunity by haind off competencies to the EU.\n\nIt's reasonable to argue that trade friction with the EU will increase and that membership provided a benefit in terms of privileged access to EU markets, but it came with costs well beyond the contributions.\n\n > Our benefit was around 600BN of trade very year, with complete dominance of the EU financial services markets.\n\nNo, it wasn't. Most of that trade would (and will) still occur, but on different terms. The argument is that a proportion of that trade would have been impacted. And the UK dominates financial services globally not just in an EU context. That isn't because of the EU, arguably its a bit 'despite' the EU.\n\n > Finacne and services are the bulk of our GDP\n\nServices are, but that's mostly not financial services, and obviously mostly that is not exports. The UK exports more goods than it does services after all. Not to mention that UK service exports are hampered both by an EU focus on goods, the EU having to consider all the other EU member states (many of which are net importers of services) and the fractured nature of the single market in services within the EU.\n\n > and this deal has no arrangements for that sector. We have lost things like passporting rights and equivalence that made London such an attractive place to base a lot of those transactions.\n\nIt also leaves financial services outside of the scope of the agreement to a large degree and allows the UK to leverage that. You'll note that when it became clear (at the beginning of the year..) that this would be the case, there wasn't a huge backlash from the city.. That's because there is almost certainly more opportunity here than cost. \n\nAnd lets just make it very clear that London is not attractive because of passporting and that we have seen a huge number of EU firms set up branches in London to mitigate the risks (in the same way that UK firms have set up branches in the EU).", "631" ], [ "> Yes... And I was saying that people are already campaigning for it, and did have political movements for it. \n\nSure, but that tends to be as part of a wider set of positions. The argument from some on remain was that UKIP as an essentially single issue party was the catalyst (by pressuring the Tories and Labour) for the current situation, and want to emulate/repeat that. And yes, there are a slew of almost invisible parties doing that already too.\n\n > OP's post seems to ignore this and the fact that it's overwhelmingly an unpopular position, even I think, amongst remain voters.\n\nIndeed, I think it's probably less popular than opposition to the EU was after the EEC referendum in the 70's, the starting position is going to be behind where the 'leave' lot were way back when, although obviously that was a long and winding road..\n\n > Your post was equally odd in saying 'there should be/are no barriers to it' because it ignores that the position already exists, and the very real actual barrier is that it is unpopular.\n\nI'm not ignoring that the position exists, I'm saying that it's healthy in a democracy for people to advocate for their positions as effectively as possible (if only so that they see that success is dependent on them winning support not some issue with the political process in and of itself). \n\nI was pretty clear that the issue was support and that under any circumstances it'd have a long road ahead of it. Indeed I finished by saying that just getting rejoin support close to where remain support was will be incredibly hard.", "564" ], [ "> A FTA with the UK has to be the least controversial thing <PERSON> has ever done from an American perspective.\n\nRight, but the bar is pretty damn low there.. The risk of politicisation and simply legitimacy (given his current 'I won the election') bullshit is problematic. If it can be agreed under <PERSON> now, it can wait and be agreed under <PERSON> in a few weeks. \n\n > The Conservatives don't need to care what other people think as they've got a huge majority and the FTA doesn't require an act of parliament.\n\nThe Conservatives don't need to care, but they don't need to invite an issue when a little bit of time makes the outcome more secure and more politically positive. The Tories being able to point to a mini-deal with a <PERSON> administration (especially after the whole 'back of the queue/protect the GFA etc.' stuff would be a benefit too.\n\nIf it were me and I had a choice, I can't see why waiting wouldn't be preferable.", "564" ], [ "> If it can be agreed now then why wait for <PERSON>? <PERSON> is currently president of the US, we can't just ignore that. Secondly, it's the senate that needs to ratify the treaty and it's obviously going to be popular with both parties.\n\nBecause <PERSON> is a political liability and it would potentially create a political issue for the UK government to agree a deal with a US president who is as damaging as <PERSON> is, at a point where his legitimacy is utterly shot?\n\n > I think you're falling into the Reddit idea that <PERSON> is bad and anything he touches is bad. In reality people are more reasonable than you seem to think.\n\nI'm saying that from a UK perspective, it's not a good idea. <PERSON> is a political liability (rightly so), the last 4 years has been punctuated by people trying to smear the government by association with <PERSON> (even though by any analysis, <PERSON> is closer to the current UK government than <PERSON>..) and this would enable that. There is no point in taking that risk.", "308" ], [ "> This is true, however I would argue leaving it outside the EU's jurisdiction is politically unfeasible, regardless of the economics. Something will be done, who knows what that is.\n\nArguably the reverse is true, the EU trying to exert political control over the Euro more broadly, especially in terms of clearing. For the EU to try and centralise that (by legislation) would weaken the Euro, add costs and give the appearance that the Euro is not a global currency and one the EU wishes to use for political leverage (beyond what the US does..).\n\nRealistically the best option for the EU would be to become more attractive for clearing generally and build up a market that can compete with the UK, but that's quite hard and way off.", "437" ], [ "> He's literally the lawful President of the United States. How can his legitimacy be questioned?\n\nBecause he's currently arguing that he won an election he lost? He lacks credibility because of his behaviour over the last 4 years and he is incredibly unpopular with pretty much everyone in the UK. \n\n > A FTA between the UK and US is not partisan and is not between <PERSON> and the UK. It's between the entire US and the UK.\n\nThere is no scope for an FTA between the UK and US at this point <PERSON> or no <PERSON>, there are some agreements that can be made around tariffs and some other very marginal elements, but why not have that discussion with the incoming administration so that it can be built on to achieve an actual agreement with the US?", "631" ], [ "> I have a bank account in belgium, germany and lithuania, and I'm dutch.\n\nI had a German bank account up until a few years ago, I was only able to open it because I had evidence of German residency, same goes for France. I could maintain the bank account, but I couldn't choose to open one from the UK (or from France). \n\nAgain, this isn't controversial, the single market for services is fragmented along national lines within the EU, the UK has said so, the IMF has said so, the EU has said so (and suggested ways to fix it.) various political parties at the European level have campaigned on it (including the EPP).", "437" ], [ "> He won the 2016 election and that makes him president now.\n\nYes, of course... \n\n > The 2020 election is irrelevant. \n\nNo, it's not. Because it means that he won't be President in a relatively short period of time, the period in which any agreement between the UK and US would come into play. The UK and US are going to be far better aligned across a whole slew of areas (from foreign policy, climate change through to trade and international relations) when <PERSON> is no longer involved. That all points to the 2020 election being important for the UK's relationship with the US.\n\n > Whether he says that he won or not is also irrelevant.\n\nOf course it is. He is currently damaging the political stability of the US, that harms the UK (the US being a key UK ally..). It's far worse than the various other bits of damage he has done to the UK over the years (either by playing with the international rules based order or indeed releasing UK intelligence information without consent..). \n\n > It may also be better to work with the existing people. How knows what will happen when the administration changes. It takes time to get into a job and build those connections.\n\nThe UK has a permanent civil service, it doesn't do the strange politicised thing the US does and almost certainly already has built relationships with the people that <PERSON> is going to put in post. Again, the current instability and political issues are a bad thing from a UK perspective, given <PERSON> will be gone in a relatively short period of time and there is no rush, waiting makes more sense in almost every way.", "134" ], [ "> Relations are fairly good now. None of this is relevant to a trade deal though. We just want some tariffs lowered. Very uncontroversial stuff.\n\nRelations are pretty strained across a slew of areas, on Iran, digital taxes, climate change, the WTO, the WHO, international norms, trade norms, even intelligence sharing. The UK and US are strong allies in a range of areas, despite <PERSON>.. And of course its relevant. The UK is looking for a reasonable FTA with the US, one that does take into account things like climate change and wider international change, the UK is looking toward CPTPP (the US might too) in context, that makes it very, very relevant going forward.\n\n > I'm aware of what our civil service is like. The point is that their civil service is going to get purged and who knows what it'll be like.\n\nMy point is that our civil service and our diplomatic staff are not only talking to the current <PERSON> political appointee set, but also with the people <PERSON> is looking to bring in to replace them..\n\n > Again, I think you're paying too much attention to far left American talking points.\n\nI'm not paying attention to US talking points at all, I'm looking at UK interests and UK perception. <PERSON> is a problem in that context, <PERSON> isn't.", "308" ], [ "> That's right now, EU will start rolling things back.\n\nWhat do you mean by 'back'? \n\n > it cannot have that much financial action outside, but as this deal does not cover it they can do it on their time.\n\nThey can't legislated it into the EU without being less open to international markets, the issue with clearing is that you generally have multiple parties, that you need broad and deep markets and that you can't fragment it. The UK does well because it carries a lot of clearing, not just Euro clearing. For the EU to compete it'd have to be more attractive for that than the UK and it has been trying to do that for decades.", "631" ], [ "I honestly can't tell if you are now agreeing that the UK and EU looking to put in place an FTA isn't somehow the UK seeking all the benefits of membership without membership, of if you just really like every tangent on offer.\n\nBrexit was 40 years in the running, the UK has been on the periphery of the EU for a long time, there are a lot of things that the UK would like in terms of a UK/EU relationship, but it doesn't come close to wanting to retain all the benefits of membership without the costs, and again, the UK and EU have both been clear on their aims.\n\n > What they did not have - as demonstrated by the idiocies of the Transition Period - is that they have spent forty years demanding something and never actually understanding what it is they are demanding or how it would be achieved in practical detail.\n\nSo they don't have an y practical detail on what they want, but they also want the same benefits of membership, but not as members? And the UK and EU are negotiating and have been for quite a long time, on the detail (according to the UK and the EU)... \n\nI'm not sure that your view of leaving, leave supporters, or the UK/EU negotiations really reflects reality to any useful extent.\n\n > You would be surprised at how many people would accept a Brexit In Name Only.\n\nQuite a lot of people would, have, if the remain side had gotten behind it rather than pushing a second referendum and revoke, the UK could have delivered on that, and the UK and EU could have diverged over a much longer period. As it is, that didn't happen..\n\n > The problem for that is it would end the Tory Party. Not a bad thing in the opinion of the 60% (and more) who voted against them in every Election since 1992.\n\nI'm not even sure it'd end the Tories, I do think it'd be better of Labour though, and a Labour government right now, would be far better than this shower, certainly one in 4 years has the potential to actually make use of the competencies and powers returned to the UK by its EU exit effectively.\n\nAlthough I'm not sure how relevant the Tories electoral chances are to the UK's current negotiating position, the issue for the Tories was the inability to recognise the remain vote with any type of exit and there being more leave supporters.", "564" ], [ "No.. Firstly the term comparable isn't just defined as 'capable of being compared', it's also a synonym for 'similar'.\n\nSecondly, the state arresting people for protest is not close to being the same thing as a political party having rules for its members and organisation. I'm reasonably sure for example that it is not hypocritical to expel a Labour member for campaigning for the Tories, or standing against a Labour candidate in an election, while also supporting the right to vote, or encouraging people to stand in elections. \n\nThis isn't about the danger, or the type of activism. It is the difference between a state doing something that goes counter to the fundamental principles that are supposed to apply in that state and so limiting democratic activity at all, and a membership organisation having rules that might at best mean that people have to chose between membership and certain activity. It's not comparable, it's not hypocritical to support HK pro-democracy protesters while supporting the ability for the party to take disciplinary action.", "651" ], [ "> Get back to me when you are ready to talk in good faith about this.\n\nI am commenting in good faith. You aren't, and frankly that's a massive problem in terms of discussion on this sub.\n\nYou kicked off not with a point, but by playing with definitions. You took the use of the word 'comparable' and turned it into a 'we can compare these entirely different situations, so they are comparable'.. They are however, completely different. \n\nBeing arrested in HK for taking part in pro-democracy protests, or for making statements that could be seen to be disparaging the police, is not remotely similar to anything currently happening within the Labour party. To suggest it is, is at best hyperbolic although mostly it's just daft. \n\n > \"discplinary action\". Gee I wonder why you keep calling it that when we're clearly talking about only the \"discipline\" related to voting within the rules that bureacrats are intefering with and not any of the actual issues that require, you know, discipline.\n\nBecause it is disciplinary action? I mean how would you define it (and I mean the act, not the outcome..).", "673" ], [ "\\ > Do you think its pro-democracy or pro-peaceful protest to allow a historically anti-leftist spy agency to kill where they deem fit?\n\nNo, of course not. Do you think that's what that legislation allowed?\n\n\\ > How's that not relevant to <PERSON> tweet? Starmers Labour was whipped to abstain on the bill that allows MI5 to murder.\n\nBecause, setting aside for a moment that it doesn't allow MI5 to murder people, MP's can vote how they want, Labour abstained and was clear as to why, and because it's probably a good idea to regulate when and how the security services break the law?", "236" ], [ "> Yeah more bad faith nonsense. I'm not wasting my time here. I have said in each post \"It's comletely bad faith to pretend that any such comparison is saying they are the same, similar amount of danger, etc\" and you keep insisting it.\n\nI keep insisting what? All I'm saying is that they are not comparable, they are not similar, not in terms of the danger, but functionally. The state taking action against citizens is not the same as a membership organisation having conditions on that membership. \n\n > You can think I'm wrong but at the point you're going \"no I want to argue against this so I'm ignoring what you say you mean and arguing that\" you're not disagreeing with me, you're arguing with a strawman in your head.\n\nI'm disagreeing with you... This isn't about the scale, or the danger, it is a completely different relationship (voluntary membership in an organisation vs citizenship and the state) and so creates a completely different dynamic. And as a result, trying to compare the two leads to a very false picture being pained, becuase the two are not comparable.", "651" ], [ "> They abstained on a bill that meant undercover cops were unable to be prosecuted for any crimes they had committed. It literally puts them above the law, if that isn't unaccountable policing I don't know what is.\n\nIt may be worth reading the legislation, or at least the explainers, and I would certainly suggest looking at the reasons given for the abstention. The issue here would seem to be that you haven't quite got a decent picture of what the situation was before the legislation passed, or what the legislation did (and indeed why it was poor legislation).\n\nThe police are not above the law, literally or otherwise. They are constrained by the law.", "582" ], [ "> It allows state agents to commit crimes to stay undercover and there is no clear line drawn as to what those crimes are.\n\nExcept of course there are clear lines drawn as to what those crimes are in terms of the constraints under the Human Rights Act and so the European Convention on Human Rights. Again, it's not great legislation, but it creates oversight and limits where previously they essentially didn't exist.\n\n > there are If they are able to break the law and not be prosecuted they are functionally above the law.\n\nExcept they aren't functionally above the law, or above it in any other context. They have to comply with the law, while previously they were simply not subject to prosecution. This legislation didn't make the security services less subject to the law, quite the reverse.\n\nAgain, it's well worth reading the legislation and the arguments around it.", "733" ], [ "It has nothing to do with this sub or social media, <PERSON> is genuinely (and not exactly unreasonably) disliked by most people in the UK, on the left, on the right, offline, online etc.. Given this would just give some elements of the traditional media another excuse to paint the Tories as similar to <PERSON> (remember <PERSON>'s US visit?!) that its just not worth it.\n\nThere is nothing to gain for the UK, and potentially something for the government to lose (and for the UK to lose if the US goes further to shit with the nonsense coming out of the White House..", "365" ], [ "We weren't relying on being the centre of the world by dint of EU membership, nor will we be relying on an empire that hasn't existed for decades either.. There is however a vast amount of inertia, London is attractive because the markets are broad and deep, the legal system is sane, the UK is stable, the language, infrastructure, regulatory basis.. London is where it is because it has worked hard to get and remain there, it's not in anyone else's gift, nor is it reliant on something that doesn't exist.", "773" ], [ "> My feeling was that London probably benefitted materially from being a large city (as the capital of the empire at the turn of the century) that then became a convenient english-speaking location for entry to the EU common market. I agree that the UK's status as a stable first world country give advantages but I struggle to see what massive advantages we would have over somewhere like Frankfurt except for already being big, which is a double-edged sword (London being amongst the most expensive cities on earth).\n\nUK law is a massive benefit, the long term approach the UK has taken to regulation is another. Again, the EU (and Germany, France and the Netherlands) have tried for a very long time to supplant London as a financial centre, they haven't come close to being able to. The UK's competition isn't in Europe and that's unlikely to change unless there are massive changes within the EU and within the member states.\n\n > Ultimately I have no idea how this is going to shake out. The UK might end up being a corporate tax haven, \n\nThat's fairly unlikely, it would be damaging to London in terms of its international trade and reputation.\n\n > London might end up gutted of large institutions \n\nThats unlikely for the reasons already given.\n\n > or everything might rumble on more or less the same as at present. I'll be very clear that I am thoroughly against brexit but it will be interesting to see how things go in either case.\n\nThe thing to watch is whether the UK can realise its ambitions of taking a global approach to services and looks globally for opportunities rather than regionally. I'd argue we are already seeing some of that.\n\nArguably long term the biggest risk is the EU actually taking the steps to make itself attractive (rather than trying to legislate it), places like the Netherlands are arguably more of a threat in those circumstances.", "631" ], [ "There is a massive issue with this position in the sense that borders are not simply arbitrary lines of division geared to keeping people out, they are also the lines between where one set of rules and laws starts and the next end, they delineate social and political division as much as anything else. \n\nAt the moment there is not only a huge amount of wealth disparity globally, but also ideological variation, religious division, social division and indeed racial hate and xenophobia. you can't simply wave that away. \n\nFor some reason people seem to assume that open borders would result in a more open society, but I'm not sure that's true at this point. But then maybe first we need to define what we mean.\n\nIf we mean that the UK should be a safe place for people seeking asylum then absolutely. It should be, where people are persecuted the UK should both provide support to people who want to come to the UK, and to those that want to end that persecution in their home country.\n\nIf we mean that the UK should be open to migrants who wish to come to the UK then again, that's not inherently a bad thing, indeed it provides a lot of benefit to the UK. But it comes both at a cost for the countries people are leaving, and creates a potential risk to the UK to the point that being selective is not neccesarily a bad idea, especially with the world as it at the moment. A huge portion of the world is less tolerant, more conservative, less inclusive, more reactionary, more religious, those views don't disappear when people migrate (indeed often they are briefly reinforced). I'm not aiming that at any particular group of people either (and the UK has its own share of problems...), homophobia is a problem whether it comes from a Nigerian, Polish, American or Pakistani migrant after all, doubly so if that is perpetuated in response to a more liberal society.\n\nIf we mean that we borders should be open to anyone who wants to make it to the UK we do introduce problems, especially if we wish to ensure that our society is fair and people have access to healthcare, social security, housing, education and all the other things we advocate for. The risk after all is not only to the potential future direction of the country but also to those already in the UK. We shouldn't close the doors (far from it..) but we should be looking at this holistically. \n\nWe need to see a more equitable world, one where people move because they want to live in a given society due to its values as much as the opportunity provided. That would seem to suggest that international aid and work to make other countries safe where they are not, better off where they are poor, better supported where infrastructure is lacking etc.. Ideally that would mean that people build the societies they want to see in the places they are as much as they will seek to move to gain access to them, rather than a few rich countries being seen as a place to get to, we might see a world that can have relatively open borders..", "678" ], [ "Isn't the issue here likely to be that even at this point that it won't be seen as a fuck up? Arguably the issue with the Tories is still about Austerity, the failure to properly fund social support, the mess they made in terms of governance, the corruption, the utterly piss poor approach to large parts of the <PERSON> response and so on...\n\nBut brexit doesn't really fit the bill as an example why they should 'never ever' vote conservative, especially if in a few years time (As seems pretty likely) the UK isn't worse off and future governments have more scope to act in the UK's interests outside of the EU than they did inside it? If the EU continues down its current role (or worse, we see more right leaning governments push the EU in that direction) I'm not sure that no longer being part of it will be seen as a bad thing by most. Labour\n\nFar from the notion that has been bounced around that in a few years leave supporters will be saying they were actually remainers, it seems far more likely that people will try to minimise their own positions and leaving the EU will be seen as just another step along the way..", "564" ], [ "You do understand that leaving a political and economic union is a subjective political decision, not something that is somehow objectively correct or incorrect (or 'false'..) right? Moreover, you do realise that (As others have said) the EU isn't exactly providing good incentives via CAP? \n\nIn addition, I just looked briefly through your links and none of them seem to suggest that there is any particular science that should be listened to, it's not evidence for remaining in a political union, nor does it in any way 'prove' what you said is true.\n\nIndeed if we take just the first point of your statement:\n\n > What are the benefits of Brexit? There are none.\n\nIt's piss easy to provide a list of benefits to not being part of the EU whether that is something tiny (like being able to prevent the import of foie gras on top of the existing ban on production) or something large, like being able to reform CAP (or abolish VAT, or negotiate trade agreements, or run a coherent commercial policy etc..). \n\nThe issue seems to be that you would prefer to see the UK remain and don't see the benefits of leaving as outweighing the benefits of membership. But that of course is subjective on your part, based on your personal positions and priorities, not some objective truth.", "564" ], [ "> I think it’s far more likely that our time in the EU will come to be viewed as a golden age of prosperity and relative equality.\n\nThat seems incredibly unlikely.. The UK saw some of its deepest recessions (immediately after joining and then again post 2008) as an EU member. Inequality increased significantly over the period. You essentially have the '97-08 period as a counter, but most people would likely paint that as a Labour benefit, not as an EU one..\n\n > We’ve effectively bargained our way out of being in the influence club, you can’t come back from that unless there’s a huge change in global economics or geopolitics, which seems unlikely.\n\nThe EU underperforms though.. It didn't really provide a boost to the UK in terms of influence beyond the regional, and it was pretty limited even there (in part because the UK wasn't at the core of the EU, but put itself at the periphery). If the UK had been more in tune with the EU project, or shaped it more you'd have a point. As it is, not really.\n\n > More likely, the EU will go ahead with closer alignment and we’ll be left on the outside looking in.\n\nIt absolutely should, it has to to meet its potential, but I'm not sure that a lot of people in the UK would see that as a benefit as such. Moreover, if the EU does integrate and does try to throw its weight around it's more likely to be seen as problematic than something we'd have wanted to be a continued part of (it'd be like suggesting that people in the UK will be sad that it didn't become a US state, or a Chinese outpost...).", "437" ], [ "It's probably worth pointing out that there will be a middle ground of people who see that there are costs and that it is not a 'perfect' deal for their personal view, but that it does extract the UK from a political and economic union and does remove the issues around control and sovereignty (any country has to take into account the likely reaction of its trading partners, especially where they have preferential access to a market). The difference is however massive when compared to EU membership.\n\nIn short, it ticks enough boxes for all but those on the fringes of the issue (so those no-dealers, or people who saw anything other than remaining as unacceptable). It also creates a lot of potential for change and leaves that in the hands of future governments.\n\nI'm about half way through a second reading of the text and yeah, I'd have liked to see things in it that aren't there, and I'd prefer elements that are there weren't, but the balance is (at least on an initial read though) not particularly problematic. Indeed it's quite a lot better than I'd hoped for in 2016.\n\nEssentially you are right, it contains elements that most groups have issues with to some extent, but it balances enough of them with things that those groups want (that is better than remaining, or not as bad as no-deal) that it turns into a viable compromise, and certainly better than a no-deal exit which is the alternative at this point.", "631" ], [ "That is how the EU works though, that is effectively the limit on the union, on solidarity within the union. There are obviously those that want to see more integration, some that are happy with where the EU is and some who want to see less, but the current framework allows the EU (collectively) to act where it is sufficiently unanimous (or actually unanimous, depending on the issue). \n\nCountries aren't hijacking the whole thing, they are operating within the established parameters that they signed up to.", "437" ], [ "I have to say, looking at this headline from outside of the US is interesting. The notion of elected judges always feels off anyway, but the complete politicisation of that is frankly scary. If you have judges that present a given political ideology, or the assumption from voters that they can elect a judge to act in line with a given set of political views then surely that utterly undermines the administration of justice? \n\nIt shouldn't have a bearing on whether a judge is in post or not and as you point out, being a good judge should mean her political affiliation is meaningless (and preferably not public in my view, but obviously different systems work for different people). Of course in a system where all of this is politicised (and so in my view, pretty broken from the outset), I suppose it's nice to see someone with similar views to my own in a position of authority, but damn, I couldn't square that with my view of the judiciary (any judiciary that isn't independendent and apolitical is a problem).", "861" ], [ "> So you reckon what Poland and Hungary did by vetoing everything is ok?\n\nI didn't agree with it, but it is in line with the rules and at the end of the day, countries sign up to the EU with an expectation of those rules applying, that is the amount of power they hand off. The EU (or a majority of members..) don't and indeed shouldn't have the power to shift that. That would be far, far more dangerous than what we are seeing from Poland and Hungary.\n\n > If the majority wants to move that direction and there's a single country that vetos it, the whole EU has to stay in its existing direction?\n\nBecause the EU is a union of sovereign states that can only move in any given direction when there is consent from all states. The UK showed the issues with that repeatedly (first by gaining opt-outs to the elements it disagreed with, then by leaving when it seemed clear that it couldn't reverse some of the things it had agreed to, but found it was beholden to popular political pressure). The EU can't force members to act in a given way if they haven't already agreed in principle to allowing the EU to do so.\n\n > So If France decides to veto the deal against UK even though the rest of the EU wants wouldn't that be called hijacking the outcome?\n\nIt wouldn't be hijacking the outcome no, and it would come with political costs within the EU for France, but it would be the EU working as intended..\n\n > Indeed its countries acting in it existing parameters, this doesn't have to anything with more or less integration. Its a fundamental problem with the EU, that a single country can veto something that could be beneficial to the whole of EU just because it has some sort of stake in it.\n\nAgain, that is what the EU is and yes, it's a problem for the EU if you want it to be able to make use of its size and meet its potential as a regional power, but the EU is the member states, they are not subordinate to it or any individual, or collection of member states. In that context, any country can veto anything that isn't an exclusive EU competency, or where it is subject to a QMV procedure. \n\nIf you want to change that, you need treaty change, which obviously requires consent in and of itself.", "437" ], [ "> Yet, the objective is different from the solution: we should never forget what we want to achieve by subscribing to a left political movement which the labor party represents, even if the objective looks hard and seems far away.\n\nSure, but it's hard to argue that ideologically the 'left' in general subscribes to the notion of open borders in general. It is usually internationalist and progressive, but that isn't the same thing (Again, depending on the definition you take..). A lot of people would argue that advocating for intervention in foreign countries where they are a threat to their own populations goes against many of the principles of the left, even while not supporting people does. And of course there is a history of outright international support and intervention in armed conflicts against opression by those on the left..\n\n > I do not want to vote left only to promote slightly higher taxes, a little bit less worker class exploitation etc etc. That is good, but does not satisfy me: it is simply not enough!\n\nGood..\n\n > I want to know that steps are made in a direction of great achievements: everyone should be well off, no poverty, no racism, no exploitation, free mental care, no prejudice towards any sexual preference, gender, religion etc etc... That is what moves people, and I think the party should also talk about that and how to realistically achieve those big objectives in the longer term.\n\nSure, but then (as above) we need to discuss the problems, the practical issues in solving them and how we can incrementally start to do that. It becomes problematic when people want to sell simple solutions to complex problems (Especially where those simple solutions create more problems). So lets have that debate and find those steps, and then propose them as policy. While we are at it, lets do what we can to promote the party so that it has a better chance at government, and so that those policies can be more than aspirations for a political party and be policies to be pursued by a state.", "886" ], [ "> In your country how do you quantify if a judge’s rulings in the past have been fair or impartial?\n\nDefendants can appeal a ruling to a higher court (which is also made up of appointed, apolitical judges..). If a ruling is extreme or out of line compared to either the guidance or other judgements then a challenge is viable (common law systems, the US included, are generally good at that). Although the US does sort of throw a spanner into that at the higher levels and how that intersects with questions of constitutionality.\n\n > In the U.S. we recognize that a judge is a glorified opinion on how laws are interpreted. Every judge is going to have a different interpretation of the law, so we pick judges based on if their legal interpretions align more with left wing values or right wing values.\n\nBut why is there a political angle at all? We use an appointments process that is effectively internal to the judiciary and legal profession. It's apolitical and doesn't involve an assessment of a political slant, but is based on the qualifications and actions of the appointees.\n\n > If you judge judges only by how many of their cases get overturned you’re missing a lot of crucial information about how your judges are locking people up.\n\nAbsolutely (although it should be a factor). But I'm still not sure why a political element is desirable or even appropriate. The need to interpret laws is usually fairly limited (new situations, unexpected outcomes, questions of law..) that tends to end up with higher courts much of the time for review, potentially all they way to the supreme court. The US seems to politicise whole segments of that (including the supreme court..). Surely the decisions made by senior courts should be based on normal practice not on the political make up of any given panel? The outcomes should be consistent. I quite literally don't know (and can't find..) details on the political balance of the various circuits or the supreme court..\n\n > Judges absolutely should be viewed in a partisan way. I don’t know if they should be elected or not. Probably not. But they absolutely are partisan and have political beliefs and their rulings will absolutely reflect their political beliefs. In my country and in yours. You should be paying attention to that.\n\nI'm not sure why judges should be viewed as partisan, that'd be a failure of the system. I'd expect a judge not to rule on the basis of their political positions, nor should they be interpreting law on the basis of their own positions. Surely a judge should weigh the law based on the legislation and precedent, in very rare cases would they be looking to establish something fundamentally new (And that'd be reviewed by other courts). I don't understand how you can achieve a fair judicial system if you have 'progressive' and 'conservative' judges that will decide cases based on a political or social view. Moreover, that seems to be almost flawed at the outset if the process is politicised to the point that judges are elected and have known party affiliations..", "861" ], [ "> On the menu: Roast turkey with **gravy**, cranberry sauce...\n\nThank god, I couldn't see any gravy in the photo and that just wouldn't do. \n\nI tend to add red-cabbage, a root vegetable mash and pigs in blankets and ensure that there are at least 2 types of potatoes, roasties+mash usually.. Oh and the standard peas & carrots thing option (and nice steamed green cabbage..) The latter bits are important for the production of bubble and squeak in the days to come. \n\nEssentially I've taken the position that I have to max out the serving bowls I have, if there is one I'm not using for something, then I haven't quite done all that was needed.\n\nAs an aside, I don't particularly like it, but my other half takes the view that Christmas dinner without bread sauce is in fact just a sunday dinner so... \n\nBy the by, your yorkshires look a lot better than mine did this year! Hope it all tasted as good as it looks.\n\nA belated Merry Christmas!", "324" ], [ "You realise that UK and EU firms have mitigated a lot of the risk specifically around financial services by establishing in both the UK and EU right? The UK temporary permission regime has seen more than 1500 EU firms get clearances too. And on clearing (as that's what your article is about...) we'll see in 18 months, but the EU isn't going to be able to achieve the massive onshoring required to duplicate the UK's effort there either..", "631" ], [ "> There is no such thing as something being absent of political dimensions.\n\nI'm not suggesting that there is. I am however suggesting that a system can be put together that aims to limit it and force an apolitical outcome wherever possible (it won't always work obviously..). And I'd argue that that is far preferable to having a political element deliberately infused by creating a situation where people may have voted for, or against a judge on the basis of ideology, or where someone may end up in front of a judge with a different political position and (not unreasonably) assume that it'd be a factor.\n\n > Even the myth of meritocratic competency within a technocratic firm is a political ideal that is ultimately unattainable, rather than some description of actual justice systems.\n\nSure, but its worth striving to get as close to that ideal as possible, rather than running headlong in the other direction.", "593" ], [ "> I don't think it is - meritocracy only acts as a myth to obscure nepotism and class warfare; it has no real grounding in improving material conditions and justice for the largest share of society.\n\nImproving the material conditions and justice is a role for elected politicians is it not? Judges exist to manage the conduct if a trial in accordance with relevant law and practice and offers decision on legal questions with an aim to ensure that the law is applied equally and fairly..\n\nMuch like the civil service implements policy whether they agree with it or not, to ensure it achieves the stated aims of the government of the day (Rather than say, running their own policy..) the idea is that they act on the basis of the law not that they try to create it or shift it.. Again, that is a job for the legislature who are accountable to the electorate..", "593" ], [ "> I think what’s flawed is your belief that judges in your country do not rule with their political biases. If your country isn’t even investigating this then you have a serious transparency problem in your courts.\n\nThey are required to act in an apolitical manner.. More to the point, there is a statutory prohibition on salaried judges undertaking any kind of political activity, including fundraising or being associated with political activity, never mind being \n a member of, or being supported by a given party. \n\nYou can add in that where a judge is perceived to hold strong views on a given political issue for whatever reason, it is inappropriate for them to hear a case in which it is relevant, irrespective of whether the matter is raised by the parties...\n\n > You also seem to think guilty or not guilty is a clear cut issue but every defendant is a individual, and every circumstance different, and sentences for crimes are often nuanced. \n\nSure, but then judges aren't deciding on guilt, juries are. Judges can give guidance on the law obviously. I'm not suggesting that it is easy to determine whether someone is guilty or not, but it is fairly reasonable to suggest that that decision should not balance on a judges political affiliation.\n\n > Should somebody caught selling cocaine be put in jail for 1-2 years or be released on probation? What if he’s a straight-A college student? What if it was only a couple grams? What if it was an ounce? What if he cut the coke himself? What if he was carrying a gun while selling this cocaine? What if he’s been convicted for drugs before? What if he’s never been convicted of a crime before? What if his previous conviction was just for selling weed to a grown man? What if he offered to testify against somebody who sells way more cocaine than himself?\n\nRight.. Which is why sentencing guidelines exist with exhaustive examples for judges to lean on to ensure that outcomes are balanced and proportionate and that someone in front of one judge won't get a 10 year sentence for something that a different judge would give probation for. And that guidance comes from years of judges looking at and evaluating cases, and evolves as societal and legal issues change.\n\n > There’s a lot of factors that can and should or shouldn’t affect a convicted person’s sentence. Judges have a lot of factors to weigh in their decisions, so precedent isn’t always helpful. A judge with a progressive streak in their rulings may be more tempted to let an otherwise good kid with no prior offenses except selling weed to his aunt be released on probation with rehab and community service and constant supervision. A judge with a conservative streak may see a repeat offender whose crimes center around drugs and wants to stop this kid from thinking he can get away with felony distribution of a serious drug and sentence him to a 2-3 years in jail.\n\nSure, so making sure that both are looking at the same guidance and being aware that any sentence can be scrutinised and appealed seems reasonable. It would also seem sensible that Judges aren't seen as being driven by an internal political position rather than the application of justice.\n\n > Both of those rulings may be reasonable. But one of those things is more likely to happen to black kids, and one of them is more likely to happen to white kids. \n\nThis seems to be massively more of a thing in the US with elected judges though..\n\n > So knowing which way you personally lean, you may want a more progressive judge on the bench or a conservative one. That’s up to you. Again, I don’t know if electing judges is a great idea, but you should absolutely be wondering if your judges in your country are ruling based on their political biases.\n\nI think the point is that if I were aware that a judge was driven by a political position, I'd expect to be able to challenge a decision on that basis alone (which would be the case) and that that should lead to sanctions for the judge (which it would).", "12" ], [ "> The law itself is political, though - it is dangerous to even allow the illusion that there is any domain of social life that transcends political will and maneuvering.\n\nOf course it is, it is written by elected individuals in a directly political environment. However the support and enforcement structures (so the police, the judiciary, the civil service, the armed forces..) should be as apolitical as possible and certainly be visibly so. You don't want someone involved in law enforcement to be openly politically partisan any more than you'd want to see that from a soldier or a civil servant. I can't see a case why that would or should be different when it comes to the judiciary..\n\n > At no point can we feel secure in some sort of ahistorical, 'apolitical' stability that exists outside/beyond society's exploitation and violence.\n\nNo, but we can do what we can to ensure that the political aspects of governance sit with elected representatives who shape the law, rather than with those who are tasked to exercise executive functions within the state. A police officer should have discretion to act on the basis of the situation he faces, but not on the basis of his personal political views on a given bit of legislation, a police force should have discretion about how to allocate resources, but based on risk and harm, not on their agreement (or not) with the law.\n\nYou create a less predictable, less stable and far more volatile society when you actively promote partisan political decision making at an operational level..", "582" ], [ "> But how would you ever find out if a judge was making decisions that slightly lean toward his political biases if your country isn’t investigating that?\n\nBecause if there is even a hint of it in terms of the decisions being made it'd be challenged by the defence (or prosecution) and then it'd be investigated..? More to the point, if a judge joined a political party, attended a protest, advocated for a political cause, donated to a political cause etc.. they'd be in breach of their statutory obligations..", "733" ], [ "> This is preferable to ossified corrupt societies; \n\nNo it really isn't, it means that political control via the electorate is broken, leads to an unpredictable and broken application of justice... \n\n > it at least gives the masses greater potential for revolution against oppressive structures.\n\nExcept it doesn't does it? More to the point, what happens after your revolution when you face exactly the same issues in terms of the judiciary and end up with an unpredictable and distorted application of justice.. surely that just makes counter-revolution more likely..\n\n > Stability is not a neutral, apolitical good either. It is an equally political (or \"partisan\") aim.\n\nStability in context is something of a guarantee of consistent application of the rules (whether the rules are good or bad being an issue for the people). A stable system may be good, or it may be bad, but any system where the rules are unstable or arbitrary is bad for those living under it, regardless of the intent.", "593" ], [ "> Brother you’re just explaining things that judges in America generally adhere to, \n\nExcept the whole 'being elected' bit, and having open political affiliations.. That, in and of itself, undermines the perception of the judge does it not (see this thread..).\n\n > they’re supposed to be apolitical as well. If you’re not actively looking for biases in your judges’ rulings you are failing to protect your citizens. \n\nAgain, surely the place where you'd look for that is in the judgements handed down, that is subject to scrutiny from the defence and prosecution by default (And anyone else with an interest in the subject matter..). That'd be people actively looking for biases and being well motivated to do so.\n\n > I appreciate that you think biases are always obvious but they’re not. \n\nI didn't suggest that biases are always obvious, I'm saying that the US system introduces obvious and visible partisanship into the judiciary via elections and political association. That is above and beyond all the normal issues that exist in terms of judicial impartiality and the perception of the same.\n\n > I hope your country is investigating this more than you’re letting on, because you have an unhealthy level of trust in people to remain unbiased. All people are biased.\n\nWhere am I trusting anyone to be unbiased..? I'm suggesting that when judges need to be elected in a partisan political system you already have a massive issue with the perception of bias before you even get to the judge doing their job.. You are front loading all of those issues already before you even need to look at what they might do on the bench. You are concerned about potentially issues around less visible biases and partisanship in the context of a system that is already explicitly partisan from the outset..\n\nIt's like saying that detecting racial bias in policing is difficult because its often subtle and hard to spot while the official motto of the local police force is 'white power'... Sometimes dealing with the overt issues is a good idea before we talk about how difficult it is to eliminate all the smaller ones.", "861" ], [ "> What's the reason for it being mandatory?\n\nMuch like things like licensing, it's to ensure that if something happens (Whether it is your fault directly or not) that the impact can be remedied. If you hit someone, or a building, or a bridge and damage property, it makes sense that the cost falls on you, but given that the cost can be massive, it's reasonable to ensure that you are able to cover it. A bond, or insurance guarantees that. It means that when you cause £1m worth of damage with your 2ton car, the bill doesn't end up getting passed on to the taxpayer.\n\n > Are there taxes involved in insurance?\n\nPresumably that depends on the country, but generally I'd assume that they are.\n\n > As far as I'm aware, where I'm from we pay for a WOF which costs around $60 plus repairs to get the car worthy to be on the road.\n\nSure, most places have some requirement to show that a car is roadworthy..\n\n > We pay a registration fee which I think is about $100 a year depending on the car which help with upkeep of the roads etc.\n\nAgain, that seems about right, most places have some sort of cost related to the registration of a car.\n\n > And I'm pretty sure we pay our tax on petrol when we buy petrol which is why we pay nearly $2 a litre.\n\nYes.. Which presumably pays for things like road maintenance, cleaning, building etc.. (among other things) and may well even be geared to offsetting the costs of the harm done by burning that petrol.\n\nNone of that covers an unexpected event (which is generally what insurance is there for) like an accident that causes damage (or injury) to a person, and the vast majority of people would not be able to cover the costs of a serious accident, hence the use of insurance mandates to mitigate the risk to other drivers (at least in cost terms), coupled with things like the need for driving licenses to ensure a minimum level of training and often points system to punish poor and dangerous driving.", "667" ], [ "> Some clown on the internet when caught talking out of his ass continues to talk out of his ass to someone who is actually working in the field that the clown is talking out of the ass about\n\nI've been working in essentially the same field for quite a long time, exporting both services (design, prototyping, support and maintenance etc..) for machinery, some of that is obviously exporting goods (parts..) the rest is services. My customers have been in the EU and the US and elsewhere... I'm pretty well aware of what I'm talking about, but obviously if the parent is in financial services he'll see a different impact if compared to design services.", "702" ], [ "> In England almost all senior judges are conservative because the institution appoints its own. \n\nI'm not sure that's even true in a political sense, they are establishment figures by design, but I doubt that they are by any means all Conservatives. \n\n > The idea that any judge is impartial is insane.\n\nThe idea that you introduce outright political direction is insane. Perhaps it's more of an issue in the US because you effectively only have a somewhat conservative and a somewhat progressive party (and so any judge will fall into either almost by default), but that doesn't quite fit for the UK.\n\n > Just reading through famous English judgments throughout the 20th century makes this obvious.\n\nDoes it? I've looked at a fair few of the more interesting ones and while it can be surprising where judges seem to take socially progressive positions, but they tend to be internally consistent and in line with the directions of the courts generally.\n\n > What each branch needs is to be appropriately restrained, starting ofc with the executive which is why the US has just survived a coup attempt that England might not.\n\nThe US barely survived a coup and is still facing issues now, institutionally it failed to restrain <PERSON> for 5 years, the issues around impeachment were frankly mad, the lack of accountability that the US can bring to bear on the executive is frankly unhealthy.. That said, US institutions appear to have been just about strong enough even with the inept battering that they too. The UK on the other hand seems far more able to quash those issues early on, there is less political capture of the state at each election (it'd be seen as a disaster of a deep state by the US far right I'd assume.) and again, an entirely apolitical element not subject to popular control..", "861" ], [ "The UK wasn't the issue with reform, the UK has been pushing for reform for a long time. The issue the EU will have is that it has a tendency to over-regulate and that member states will see this as a potential cash cow and are averse to risk, while simultaneously failing to mitigate it. EU27 banks are under capitalised and somewhat risky at the moment, the EU has a somewhat broken (but developing) currency union and a slew of issues around government and private finance that London solves.\n\nThe EU could fix that, member states could fix that, but they all need to decide how and then achieve that, so far that hasn't really been a thing.", "631" ], [ "Financial services isn't the UK's biggest export sector, the EU only accounts for a minority of the UK's services exports, and the sector has spent the last year or so knowing it won't be included in this agreement and so we have the UK setting up mechanisms to mitigate access issues for EU firms, and UK firms actively establishing branches in the EU.", "631" ], [ "> 'Reforms' to keep more financial trade within the bloc I mean ( general reforms of EU27 banking are overdue) . We got a foretaste with Euro clearing. Without a veto, there is less we can do to protect UK interests considering GATS exemptions, and we have less sway on the shape of general reforms.\n\nThe problem with that is that it runs counter to the EU's own aims in that it makes the Euro less attractive and business more expensive, it also faces opposition internally. And of course the UK has less sway in the direction the EU takes, but it arguably has more sway in the global landscape as it is, actions taken to harm London's interests also harm the US's and China's too for that matter. It's not something that will be easy for the EU to navigate internally or externally, and any reform will be slow (much slower than the reactions will be from elsewhere..).\n\n > Regulation is also a double-edged sword. Over-regulation is indeed a risk, but so is under-regulation. We're still discovering the destabilising consequences of the latter post-GFC. \n\nThe 'amount' of regulation is always a bit of a daft argument, the key is generally 'good' regulation (which sometimes is only obvious in hindsight), right now though, the UK is in a better position than the EU in regulatory terms (quite a few EU member states haven't even fully implemented the last raft of EU reforms properly) and obviously those elements that sit with national regulators are a bit of a mess in an EU context.\n\n > Indeed, it's probably no accident populists took the reins in the US and UK. A measure of caution toward freewheeling finance may be no bad thing.\n\nAbsolutely, but again, the UK has been pretty damn good at that (both before the GFA and since), if you look at systemic risk, it's not really sitting in the UK, indeed the UK has seen a reduction in risk (even more now that there has been something of a shifting of responsibility for EU/non-EU holdings..). There is a massive risk within the Eurozone both around government debt and bank holdings, that's before we get to the potential impact of COVID on the mid-term and any other little crisis that might pop up (and I can imagine that Italy, Greece, Spain, Poland and Hungary all have plenty of opportunity to spark one..). \n\nEither way, the EU could compete with the UK in this area, but it would take a fairly major change to get there, and we aren't seeing that. At best we've seen attempts to regulate business into a given area, and that doesn't tend to work out that well.", "631" ], [ "Fair enough. If it were me I'd figure out which were the commissioned ranks (IIRC from the French that's anyone not wearing a chevron, but has rank insignia....) and salute them as you would your own officers.Given you aren't an officer you at least don't need to start counting bands to figure out whether you should be saluting or be saluted. \n\nIn terms of rendering a salute (by whatever means..) wherever I've been it has always been about your own customs granted as a courtesy to foreign officers, and they tend to take that as read. I wouldn't (didn't..) salute a US officers if I wasn't wearing headdress even if that would be the norm in the US for example, and our lot wouldn't salute US warrant officers as a matter of course either, which can get interesting.\n\nAlthough I get the impression that US military culture is sufficiently varied that that professionalism tends to win out even if it comes across as somewhat stilted, and the approach to fraternisation tend to get relaxed quite rapidly when mixing with foreign forces. Apparently everyone having a piss up round a WO's house, including a fair number of junior ranks is not so much a thing in the US Army outside of 'semi-formal' events.. \n\nI also wouldn't worry too much about knowing the specific rank, you don't speak French, feel free to make an effort but 'sir/ma'am' tends to do the job pretty well 99% of the time. \n\nI'd suggest 'be nice, make them feel welcome' but if you aren't actually working with them that might be a tad harder anyway.", "798" ], [ "The top 25 just as it's a few clicks in and I'd assume people are interested in the rankings as much as they are the methodology etc..:\n\n1. Finland\n2. Denmark\n3. Switzerland\n4. Iceland\n5. Norway\n6. Netherlands\n7. Sweden\n8. New Zealand\n9. Austria\n10. Luxembourg\n11. Canada\n12. Australia\n13. **United Kingdom < -- You are probably here.**\n14. Israel\n15. Costa Rica\n16. Ireland\n17. Germany\n18. United States\n19. Czech Republic\n20. Belgium\n21. The UAE\n22. Malta\n23. France\n24. Mexico\n25. Taiwan", "519" ], [ "Significantly limited access to guns, not banned. And obviously we also have incredibly low levels of gun crime involving actual firearms, a low number of gun fatalities and few police shootings. As much as I'd like to still be able to do pistol target shooting, I can mostly live with the UK's approach to guns.", "701" ], [ "This sub is only for content which has a substantial relevance to England.\n\nAnything else should be directed towards the UK subs;\n\n- /r/UnitedKingdom\n\n- /r/CasualUK\n\n- /r/UKPolitics\n\n- /r/AskUK\n\nNote: Given you've got an answer and it doesn't look England related I've binned it as per the provisional rules. If anyone disagrees ping the mod team, it's part of the discussion about the purpose/direction of the sub..", "579" ], [ "**Hi, your post has been removed by a human..**\n\nI've removed this as the source is problematic if you read the article, a fair few bits don't make sense and it appears either translated (badly) or someone has pulled the daily mail article on the same subject and then tried to randomly change some of the words (so: *who was kicked off a prepare for fare dodging / at Oxford Street prepare station in Manchester / who requested the lady if she had a sound ticket. / <PERSON>, generally known as the ‘the mom of the liberty motion* etc*...).*\n\nI've noted the source as problematic, but you are obviously free to post the same story from a different source if you wish.\n\n*If you believe this message is posted in error,* [*message the /r/uk team*](_URL_0_) *and include a link to this post. Please don't do this lightly, we're very busy and have likely acted correctly.*", "477" ], [ "No. It's a terrible website because it hosts a huge amount of scientific literature that would otherwise be hard to access and facilitates the sharing of knowledge in an a way that is not legal and likely harms publishers, even if it seems researchers quite like the idea. You should warn others, especially those that might have in interest in science and who are not aware that the site exists, I'm sure if they take a look at it and the issues around sharing knowledge and scientific journals they will come to the right conclusion.", "566" ], [ "They are moderated in the same way. Comments that break the site or sub rules are removed and where appropriate action is taken against the user involved. Comments that do not break the rules, even where individual moderators don't agree with the opinions expressed are obviously not removed . If there were significant numbers of comments promoting or inciting violence, or threatening other users this thread would be marked as moderated and comments would all be reviewed. \n\nIf you see comments that you think break the sub or site rules (and I can't see any that have not already been removed), report them.", "156" ], [ "How does anyone, ever think that that is a sensible move? It's bad enough when you occasionally see people fuck up overtaking before an exit and cut it fine, occasionally people will miss one from the fast lane and cross multiple lanes, you can sort understand that (if not condone it) even though it's also potentially lethal, entirely avoidable and pretty daft. But effectively coming to a stop on a motorway, in that sort of weather, with another exit seconds ahead? That's some properly high grade stupidity with potentially lethal outcomes.", "523" ], [ "I'd sort of assume that only works if people understand what is expected, in both instances I'd have found it incredibly odd (probably wouldn't have caught on with the first one at all), the second maybe, although I'd have wanted some paperwork to show that I'd paid.. \n\nYou can probably throw in that almost all of my interactions with government (in terms of payments) whether its tax related, building regs, driving license additions or changes etc.. are all pretty universally electronic and now largely on-line via government sites. I also sort of get the impression that individual civil servants/officials/police etc. don't really have the ability make things appear and disappear without a (digital I'd assume) paper trail. Essentially any bribe/payment would have to either fit in with those systems or sit entirely outside of it which (at least on the individual level..) seems to largely not be a thing. \n\nThat said, it doesn't change the fact that if you have the money you can pay to go private in a healthcare context, or pay for a private place at a nursery, although again that'd be open, transparent and recorded.", "779" ], [ "> I work in an industry that has very tight regulations on 'gifts' and construction contractors seemed especially eager to give out free football tickets, etc. to staff (pre-pandemic of course); banks also seem to be fond of gift giving, I've seen offers of race days at Silverstone to Finance Directors.\n\nYup, some of the networking sort of falls in that direction, although I suppose the point is that it is essentially networking. There is no wider obligation (if you get taken out to a restaurant or on a race day by a potential supplier, that might push you toward using them, but you obviously don't need to and often you'll have multiple people involved in signing off any purchase anyway. Even within small firms the value for money aspect tends to take a bit of precedence, the networking element is essentially about trying to build relationships on top of that).\n\n > For example, cronyism was a consistent theme of <PERSON> time as London Mayor and it has been and will continue to be a theme of his premiership; but I'm not sure how much bribery is involved instead of just preferential treatment for his mates to get paid exhorbitant amounts by the taxpayer. Corrupt, yes, but probably not anything as direct or prosecutable as bribery.\n\nYup, that's essentially a combination of nepotism and cronyism, and even then sometimes the perception is pushed a little (the whole, X had ties to a business that had ties to Y). Be interesting to see what comes out of the inevitable look over the Covid contracts though.", "460" ], [ "> Say you have a construction company. You could invite some key players to a nice dinner and give them premium cards for a football match. In exchange they put in a good word for you on the deal. And you just bribed someone.\n\nThe 'In exchange' part tends to be the issue. Or rather it becomes rather grey, if there is no obligation (which there isn't) and where companies have any issue around their own reputations, it'd take more than a dinner or some tickets to get the good word in, generally there has to be some level of trust. And obviously that 'good word' doesn't mean anything either unless it would open an opportunity that wasn't available otherwise. If you offered a false reference on the back of it then sure, but beyond that? Dishonesty or illegality is implicit if we are talking about a bribe, a supplier taking a customer out for a meal in the hope that they'll recommend them to others doesn't really reach the bar for a bribe. It'd be like someone paying you to allow them to promote the fact that you use their services/products.", "460" ], [ "> I made it more explicit here than it would be in real life, but that is how it would work in reality. And a good word may mean much or not much. It could be the building permit that gets a higher priority after you went golfing with the relevant supervisor. It could be a loan application that is looked at more favourably.\n\nThe difference there is that a good word 'can't' generally get a building permit a higher priority (because the processes tend to be non-discretionary and the people involved in the process are disconnected from approvals and applications).\n\nI mean I could try and bribe my local building control, but it would have to be extremely blatant and so likely to be identified and acted on. Same goes with loan applications, simply picking out an application and treating it differently would be massively problematic simply because it pops so many flags around money laundering and so on. It's hard (not impossible obviously..) to have that sort of influence in formalised processes and where individuals have little personal power to act in isolation of others.\n\nIn short it is the ability to dishonestly provide an expedited service in almost every instance. The person you discuss your loan with at the bank can't authorise the loan or prioritise it, at best they might be able to chase on your behalf (the same applies to building control..), and the special treatment is then exceptionally limited and so worth less.\n\nBribes work when you have someone (or a group..) you can provide a benefit to so that they act against the interests of whoever they work for and in yours. That almost certainly exists everywhere, but it is much, much harder (especially at a 'retail' level) to achieve if there isn't a single person or tight group that can act.", "499" ], [ "**Sorry, your submission has been manually removed by a human!**\n\nWe mostly don't accept polls, surveys or petitions in this subreddit, due to the volume we receive.\n\nWe make exception on a case by case basis, usually only for petitions on the official Parliament site, linked directly to the description page. Although this is by no means a guarantee of Submission Approval.\n\nConsider /r/samplesize for surveys. If we have a sticky megathread available, you are typically permitted to make a comment there.\n\n\n\n*If you believe this message is posted in error, [message the /r/uk team](_URL_0_) and include a link to this post. Please don't do this lightly, we're very busy and have likely acted correctly.*", "804" ], [ "It's not that different, it is very much a perception thing though, it is seen as a rich person's game (and while it mostly isn't, it can be quite expensive to get into..) and it can lead to quite a bit of land being not public anymore. That said, a lot of courses up near me are on land you couldn't build on for a slew of reasons and are less manicured (so presumably provide some bio-diversity/habitat protection) while still being accessible. \n\nIn short there are some real issues and a I think a few where it's just an 'easy' bit of demonisation, you see similar issues around some other sports/activities that are associated with the rich and so seen as problematic regardless.", "729" ], [ "Some people really like to push to see what they can get away with. I think the longest and most comical discussion I had in the same vein was about some pressure switches needed for a relatively harsh environment, so we ordered what were supposed to be ruggedised single epoxy coated aluminium cased sealed switches good for very cold temperatures and vibration, which are quite expensive on a per unit basis. What turned up were relatively standard, cheap plastic ones, with a sticker on saying that they were for harsh environments..\n\nWe ended up sourcing replacements from elsewhere anyway and hadn't paid the invoice we had, and I basically spent about 9 months having an email back and forth about these switches. The supplier was absolutely amazing in terms of comms. They started by taking the position that they were in fact the ordered item, then that they weren't, but were in fact better, then that they weren't and weren't better, but were very affordable, then that while they were expensive for what they were and not suitable, maybe they'd be useful in some other context. They offered a discount on our next invoice, they offered to send more of the same switches, they offered a discount on our actual invoice..\n\nIt was absolutely amazing. It was almost sad when they gave up and told us to keep the switches (And that any future orders(!) would be payment in advance....). They still send us a catalogue though.\n\nCompletely bizarre.\n\nAlthough lower level versions of the same a pretty damn common, it's almost always worth finding and sticking to a supplier who doesn't dick about even where its more expensive given the amount of other work it creates dealing with the drama.", "618" ], [ "If you look at the polling on why people voted leave and indeed the aftermath I think it's fairly reasonable to say that racism probably played a fairly minimal role. You had a minority of racist/xenophobic leavers pushing it as such, and even some on the remain side presenting leaving risky as it'd lead to more 'non-EU migration', but most (both left and right wing...) leave voters were seemingly driven by a slew of issues around the EU. Even the hard anti-FoM lot were pushing the lack of fairness in (primarily white european..) migration from the EU as an issue..", "564" ], [ "Which IIRC was lambasted by pretty much everyone involved (and I mentioned in my other comment), and was run by the unofficial leave campaign. It'd be like me linking to the literal fascists who supported remain and suggesting that white Euro-nationalism was a major driver for the remain side...\n\nIt was a factor, more racists voted leave than remain, but it wasn't the driving one based on the polling.\n\nThe whole 'leave voters are just racists and xenophobes' messaging was and remains pretty shite because it was and is still being used to mask the issue that people don't really like the EU as a political project even to a large extent on the remain side. It was an easy attack line that didn't work and doesn't really stand up to scrutiny.", "564" ], [ "You are aware that he wasn't part of the official leave campaign and was seen as divisive by the official leave campaign though right? The issue being that he was seen as neither able to build and indeed problematic when it came to building a broad coalition for leaving the EU? \n\nIf we are discussing the politics, he was absolutely pivotal in putting pressure on the major political parties, especially the Tories and so getting a referendum at all, but he was deliberately sidelined and boxed off during the campaign. That poster is a good example of why, to win, the leave campaign needed a lot more votes than the UKIP faithful, it needed votes from those people that didn't like the EU, but also didn't like <PERSON> (so most of the leave voting left, and a fair portion of the leave voting 'centre'). \n\nI have no doubt that he was useful in maintaining support among the right and his support base, but they were broadly not going to vote remain anyway.", "564" ], [ "> Won't inflation sky rocket this year due to increased costs (i.e shipping) a la brexit?\n\nNo, if you look at the inflation projections around brexit they sit at around 1% above the current 'normal' and the current normal is a pretty historic low. There was no suggestion that inflation would 'shy rocket' from anyone sensible, although obviously price rises are not uniform (so some goods will be cheaper, some more expensive..).\n\nGiven that the pound is also slowly rising (it's at a year long high against the Euro, three year high against the dollar at the moment...), that'll offset that a little too. All in there are a lot of factors when it comes to the prices consumers pay, there is a little more upward pressure than there has been more recently, but it has been far weaker than normal for quite a while.", "73" ], [ "I'm not trying to whitewash anything, I'm trying to point out that the reason there now seems to be some confusion in trying to match up broadly pro-immigrant, pro-immigration, less racist/xenophobic polling with brexit is that people seem to be ignoring the polling on why people voted to leave. \n\nThere is a massive over-estimation as to the impact that racism and xenophobia had on the brexit vote, and that is borne out by the polling, yet people seem confused when polling on things like islamophobia, racism, xenophobia and indeed sentiment toward immigration doesn't match up to that narriative.\n\nDoes that make sense? \n\nIt's also really important for us as a party if we want to address the issues people have, the notion that Labour is (or should be!) catering toward public opinion in these areas, without apparently understanding what that public opinion actually is.", "564" ], [ "It really really is. It's a bit of a pisstake really. \n\nTo a certain extent you could maybe assume that because any replies get downvoted fairly massively that that'd be a reason for it, but I think it's more likely just promoting a fairly false narriative. (honestly don't understand how people managed to get through the referendum and the period since without seeing something..). It always gets upvotes, anyone responding in good faith tends to find that they are told that pretty much any reason given, any legislation referenced or anything else presented is somehow not relevant, and then in the next thread you see exactly the same vacuous claim.\n\nI've broadly stopped engaging with it, but I'm not sure that that's the right approach eiter.", "263" ], [ "Indeed, and it has to be said that none of this is particularly new (the Soviets made it incredibly easy to pick individual phrases from speeches that without context were massively more threatening than they were likely intended to be, so that's what we did...), but it is incredibly annoying when people only see it when the 'other' side does it, and worse, where they take it as fact and so dismiss the rest of the point.\n\nThere is a lot to dislike about <PERSON>, but the argument that people will distrust experts who appear to be pushing an ideological line despite getting their predictions wrong again and again is valid enough, using it (as has been done) as a suggestion that the leave camp didn't want to listen to experts in general was a fantastic bit of campaigning, it fed into the 'stupid brexiteer' thing perfectly, but that is polarising and it isn't helpful to actually solve the issues we face..", "30" ], [ "> He shut down parliament in an attempt to prevent Brexit deal negotiations, effectivery enforcing a \"no deal\" Brexit. This was a real violation of democracy by an unelected politician, and a move condemned by conservatives and labour alike.\n\nThat doesn't really make any sense.. Shutting down Parliament doesn't prevent negotiations, and it didn't prevent Parliament from passing a bill to force an extension.. \n\nIt isn't a violation of democracy either, it is arguably a political ploy, but it's not as though MP's are champing at the bit to do something about brexit but <PERSON> has prevented it, if anything the opposite is true, MP's have been trying to avoid doing anything about brexit (which is why we have legislation for an extension, not agreement on a deal, or a revocation) and <PERSON> appears to have been trying to use pressure to force action.\n\nThat said, it's your college you get to do what you want, although in my view this tends to look more petulant than practical (and I say that as a Labour member who doesn't particularly like <PERSON>).", "236" ], [ "Lots of different things.. Is there a specific are you are interested in? \n\nBroadly though (and again, it varies..) there tends to be a rural/urban divide and a major difference between sports shooters and everyone else. Broadly though, there is support for fairly stringent regulation and restrictions on firearm ownership generally. There are very very few people who support firearm ownership for self-defence (in a preemptive way, absent a specific threat anyway) or without some other good reason. \n\nCurrent issues in this area would include the current push to restrict some types of weapons further (see the Offensive Weapons Act 2019 and the current EU push) as well as issues around doctors signing off on firearms certificates, as well as a slew of other minor (and less well developed) issues.\n\nFrom the sports shooting side there has been a reasonably long term push to relax rules around pistol shooting (That last became newsworthy around the 2012 Olympics IIRC). \n\nOther trends include discussion about routinely arming the police (the polling tends to come after incidents, so has been as high as 70%...) and support among the police is relatively higher than it has been at the moment too, although it is still something that governments (of all stripes..) seem to oppose and that is seen as a negative by senior police officers.\n\nThe UK has it's own [NRA](_URL_0_) that is rather different from the US one, and worth a look if this is an area of interest...", "225" ], [ "> I mean but that is the thing just about anything can be used as a weapon a car a chair a plate.\n\nSome things are designed as weapons, and lots of 'dangerous' things have licensing or handling restrictions in law, whether that's chemicals, vehicles or alcohol. A gun is a better weapon than a chair or a plate and is regulated as such... \n\n > I believe that people should own guns not just for self defense but to use them in an act of rebellion incase a tyrannical government rises to power\n\nGreat, most of the UK wouldn't agree with you, and in a practical sense it almost certainly isn't particularly useful a countries armed forces will generally be better armed than civilians anyway (in the context of the UK, or US or any major country, significantly so), in the event of rebellion, you need some of those people to fight against the government for any chance of success, and if they do, they come with actual weapons. Throw in that the first thing any potentially 'tyrannical government;\nis going to do is further restrict firearms (and most law abiding people will go along with it) it doesn't seem like something that should be particularly relevant to how firearms are regulated.", "349" ], [ "> How is shutting down parliament to stop it from forcing him to ask for an extension (which he has said he will not do even if it means breaking the law) so he can force through something which would be deeply damaging to the country not a violation of democracy! \n\nWell firstly, and obviously, he didn't shut down parliament to stop it from forcing him to ask for an extension, that should be abundantly clear given that Parliament did indeed legislate to force him to ask for an extension. Indeed there was time (which parliament used to legislate) before prorogation, and time once Parliament is sitting again, before the UK leaves the EU. In short, Parliament has time to act and has indeed acted (although only to force an extension, not to actually resolve anything)..\n\nI also rather suspect that his suggestion that he will not request an extension is on the basis that he will be able to pass a deal through Parliament (likely <PERSON> deal..) not that he'll ignore the law, not least because of the <PERSON> amendment, but also because simply not complying with the law isn't really an option for a PM and Parliament can still act if it looks likely..\n\n > It would be like if <PERSON> suspended Congress because they were going to impeach him.\n\nExcept not like that at all, because Parliament has sat and will sit, did pass the legislation they were mulling for the best part of a year and it isn't trying to act, it's trying to avoid having to act (an extension rather than an exit deal or a revocation..).", "236" ], [ "> Up til now his politics is just promises. \n\nHe was Mayor of London and an MP for quite a long time.. We have a voting record and a legislative history there that would indicate a rather different political direction than we have seen from <PERSON>..\n\n > Let us see what he and his British “Republicans” actually are going to deliver.\n\nI'm not sure that the Tories are analogous to the Republicans in any meaningful way, the only reason they tend to be lumped together is that they are on the right of their respective national political spectra. The current UK Tory party (and indeed <PERSON>..) is probably closer to the US Democratic party than the Republicans, especially if you go with the major threads of policy. There is some overlap if you look at very moderate republicans and broad economic philosophies, but that's about it.", "365" ], [ "It's relatively common for parties (both large and small..) to breach electoral law, often the Electoral Commission will help get parties into compliance or give them time to come into compliance, where that isn't possible you'll find fines and reprimands. There used to be a nice pdf of everything breach related, however now there is [this](_URL_0_) that gives you an overview. You'll note lots of late filings, lots of failures to report, lots of issues with accuracy. \n\nThe new EC site makes it much harder to find stuff though..", "636" ], [ "> That is nice to hear that he is not so bad as he appers right now (seen from the Continent).\n\nIt's because everything is being distorted by different ideas about what brexit is (the notion it is a hard right policy position makes no sense in a UK context...). Throw in the easy comparison with <PERSON> on a visceral and superficial level (see the hair!) and it becomes a bit of a trope that doesn't really match the reality.\n\n > About the Tories/Republicans. - I was a bit to harsh there. Sorry. \n\nDon't be, the Republicans are diabolical, but the Tories are a major problem in and of themselves, both ideologically and practically for the last decade. It's important to keep the 'why they are a problem' in mind though.\n\n > It is just when I see those who talk 100 % like their leader I get this impression. \n\nIf you think that <PERSON> (or the Tories in general) sound like <PERSON> then you either aren't listening to <PERSON>, or aren't listening to the Tories (or <PERSON>..). <PERSON> is scary in terms of the official (and so intelligible) statements and arguably even scarier with his unintelligible nonsense statements that seem to come from him directly. <PERSON> occasionally spouts bullshit, but mostly he is both intelligible and broadly sane sounding. The egotistical ravings of <PERSON> are pretty much unparalleled.\n\n > And many do. Like when they say that <PERSON> do not want an election while the truth appear to be that he wants to stop no deal before an election can happen.\n\nNo-deal is off the table, legislation has been passed.. And remember that legislation was passed in the time between the end of recess and prorogation (when people were arguing that there had been a 'coup' and that <PERSON> had usurped democracy). So in that context, the hyperbole and spin is coming pretty thick and fast from both sides in the UK. It's also on a rather different level from the 'Arrest her!' bullshit that <PERSON> would come out with.\n\n > There is a difference there which the Tories do their best to hide. And when the Tories mimic that some “negotiations” are going on with <PERSON>. While we in the 27 know that this is not true. Also it is silly that Tories pretend that they can get “a better deal” than the one which actually exists. And that your “negotiation position” might be weakened if something bad is going to be disclosed to the public. For there is no \"negotiation position\" to weaken. - It is all make-believe.\n\nAgain, the issue here is more about how it is being presented than the content. The Tories want to leave with a deal, they can't pass the current deal through Parliament, there are discussions ongoing about what might be possible to make the deal palatable, there is a major issue (hurdle is too small a term) in the backstop, but again both the UK's 'it's all going splendidly' and the EU's 'we will not move at all for any reason' are broadly political statements and to some extent spin. If the EU can see a way through to a deal, it will shift, as long as that is the case the UK will claim its all wonderful and possible.\n\n > <PERSON> seems to be the most sensible as she is trying to support a change in your voting system, so you start voting \"proportionally\" instead of \"winner takes it all\". This \"proportional\" system plus having a bit more parties to choose from is what seems necessary to avoid that you have to argue with each other for generations to come about this Brexit.\n\nNo, what would be needed is consensus in the country about how to leave, that isn't going to change with more parties involved (it'll just mean more parties that can't agree on a common position). The issue right now isn't proportionality it is that the issue crosses party lines and the usual divisions and that there isn't a parliamentary majority to push either a deal, no-deal or a revoke.\n\nAlthough more broadly there is need for reform!", "365" ], [ "> Ye I mean the drop from 2008-2009 post financial crisis was obviously worse but we still posted the lowest level in cable since 1985 last week which was deemed quite significant.\n\nIt's not just the actual rate, it's the movement. The 1993 drop is significantly more significant than the post referendum drop, as is the 2008 drop. If you smooth out the speculative rise pre-referendum it's not a massive shift from the existing trajectory. That said, it is hitting new lows, but then it has been broadly falling against the dollar since the 50's..", "928" ], [ "Unless you are trying to access the content of a phone the pin/fingerprint/face locks are all gone when you force a factory reset, a silly proportion of people don't use screen locks at all and another group seem to have very long timeouts. That said, for a sophisticated thief, an unlocked phone can be a bonus if it gives them access to things like email accounts and usernames (think password resets with 2FA where the phone both has the account details on, is set to receive the email and 2FA code..) for anything that allows them to spend or transfer money, or make payments directly.\n\nFor everything else, a factory reset will generally leave the thief with a resell-able phone. Things like IMEI blocks often don't happen either or are network specific, often victims won't go through the hassle of reporting properly, and sometimes insurers seem to not bother.\n\nEven where a phone ends up blacklisted, they tend to be sell-able for 'spares', especially displays, especially on newer models. \n\nI've only really had experience of this from the security side (it's amazing how people who should really be security conscious manage to open huge holes into their organisations on the basis of convenience..) but from what I understand, a stolen phone is usually worth very little to the thief, but quite a bit to the people knowingly buying them for peanuts and turning them around.", "927" ], [ "> Existed and used are different things. \n\nSure, but we are talking about 8mm, that stuck around for a long time (well into the digital era..) shooting to 8mm tape and then either watching it back directly playing from the camera or playing it out to a VCR was pretty common for consumer camcorders. As to sales, 8mm single unit camcorders dominated the 'home' market because they essentially created it, before the 1980's home video is rare and was expensive.", "854" ], [ "In many countries the police absolutely can break into your house and steal evidence, or indeed have someone else do it, they would be subject to prosecution though. It doesn't generally disqualify the evidence (and certainly doesn't prevent the police from using it to direct an investigation), but it can make it easier to challenge depending on the context. Assuming that the aim of the justice system is to get to the truth, then just because evidence has been obtained illegally shouldn't generally disqualify it on its own (although if there is any question of it being planted, tampered with and so on that obviously becomes something for judges and sometimes juries to look at). \n\nThe while 'fruit of the forbidden tree' thing from the US is somewhat unusual in that context.", "260" ], [ "> Note that the evidence would have been admissible in the states as well as the police neither broke in themselves or instigated the theft (paid or told someone else to do it). While the unclear chain of custody means that it wouldn't hold up in court as the sole piece of evidence the police would have been perfectly justified to conduct a warrant. \n\nAbsolutely, although it would likely have been challenged to some degree and becomes problematic quite quickly. However my point was aimed at the claim about 'The police can't break into your house and steal evidence or have someone else do it' in lots of countries they can, it doesn't taint the evidence in the way it does in the US, but the police are generally still culpable for any offence they commit along the way. \n\n > The prosecutor might have to establish in court the potential motive of the thief, but since that it basicly \"Would the average american, even a thief, have been so offended by this that he would have been motivated to do it?\" that wouldn't be very difficult.\n\nIndeed, the police would however have to show that there is no link between them and the criminal, or go down the few other routes available for including illegally obtained evidence.", "260" ], [ "Yeah, I do this with computers, servers and phones on a fairly regular basis, often buying fairly random lots on ebay.. It's also generally how I maintain my existing kit. The exceptions are when it comes to storage and batteries, those I'd buy new.\n\nI think my biggest success in that area was buying a random lot of kit that included a samsung phone I wanted a screen for (eldest child broke his display, I figured I'd fix it). The lot included an ipod, an iphone and a few other bits of randomly broken gear. It arrived and within 24 hours I had a working ipod and iphone (both had battery issues that were overcome with a slow trickle charge and then a full charge, I factory reset them and use the ipod for running...) a repaired samsung (IIRC I ended up swapping the battery into the 'new' phone and flattening it rather than repairing the other one in the end as it turned out the one I bought was in better shape. The remaining kit IIRC comprised of working parts, some random RAM (that happened to fit my printer..) and a few other bits.\n\nOn laptops, I semi-regularly buy and recondition lenovo X series laptops, they tend to be cheap to buy (so picking up one with a broken screen and knackered plastics, and repairing it with parts from one with water damage is easy, quick and usually doable) and as ex-corporate there are a lot of them out there. Currently the whole family (6x..) have a well specced laptop each and I have a pile of spares.\n\nI have wondered a few times if it would be worth buying a few (I think I average about £50 for a working X230) cleaning them up, throwing in a cheap SSD and selling them again but I don't think the value is quite there (I might make £70-100 per laptop, but it'll take a couple of hours per machine to diagnose, clean and repair, and then package and ship so..).", "923" ], [ "**Sorry, your submission has been manually removed by a human!**\n\nWhen linking to articles, please keep the article title verbatim, and never give your own opinion within it.\n\nCertain sources have further instruction:\n\n- Twitter - Use the Tweet as the title. Please keep your comments to a comment reply, rather than the selfpost.\n\n- YouTube/video (news) - Use the video title\n\n- YouTube/video (other) - Provide the most accurate reflection of the video you can, with no opinion.\n\n\n\n*If you believe this message is posted in error, [message the /r/uk team](_URL_0_) and include a link to this post. Please don't do this lightly, we're very busy and have likely acted correctly.*", "156" ], [ "Since you are looking to remove bias, I'll just preface this with the fact that I'm a leave voter, so you know, take that how you will in terms of the below.\n\nYou the nail on the head by saying that the definition of crisis is relatively critical, and I'd argue that by any reasonable measure it's not a crisis for the EU. It might create issues for some EU exporters (those that rely on the UK For a significant portion of their exports) just as it is for UK Exporters in the same boat.\n\nIt'd also seriously question what the long term scale of trade diversion is in context. We know there has been a bit of a shock to exports and imports, some of that is confusion (VAT/Customs forms) much of it for larger firms was about reducing burden at the point of transition. We also know that the UK has been reducing dependence on EU imports for a while. Obviously that's not 'a third of shoppers', but rather the wider import picture and probably the much larger part, if it looks like some significant portion of that is substituted (either onshored production or sourced from other markets) it'd have an impact on the EU and could create a crisis, but we are nowhere near seeing an indication of that yet. Moreover, given that while UK/EU trade friction has increased, it's only really increased to the same level (or lower) than other imports. \n\nFor individual shoppers I'd be frankly astounded if on larger platforms, they actually look at who the seller is. I can see people avoiding anything where there are warnings of additional charges (so any non-VAT registered, DAP sales essentially), or where it is confusing (while people get used to the idea anyway), but I have no idea what that is in terms of the proportion of imports. So at best this probably comes down to a third of buyers not buying some things they might otherwise have (very rarely anyway) directly from EU sellers. That'll be a tiny proportion of trade and likely have an even smaller impact on the EU. Now again, for the individual firms selling things it might be problematic, but I doubt its a crisis.\n\nAs an aside, looking at population is a bit daft in isolation, even if you assume a uniform spread, there likely weren't 4.7m people knowingly buying from EU sellers on a regular basis anyway, but then UK buyers are also generally high value buyers (so there isn't a 1:1 population map..), and also have a massive online buying preference compared to many in the EU.\n\nRealistically we'll start seeing trends in sales information and the wider economic data relatively quickly, the first few months are likely to be somewhat uncertain, but it should give an indication of the direction of travel at least.\n\nI'd also avoid looking at individual companies and individual stories to try and infer a sector or economy wide trend, it's a bit like currency movements, or job losses etc. You often only see the negatives (and so it can seem that only bad things are happening..) and don't actually get a real indication of scale. A German seller losing 30% of their sales because UK buyers are sourcing things elsewhere for example (something that isn't that unlikely by the way, some of the worst hit businesses are going to be those importing from places like China, in low cost EU countries who were previously reselling block wide, with the UK as a major customer) is only really an indication that that seller has a problem, not that it applies to their sector generally, or all EU sellers. Anecdotes not being data and all that.\n\nSo no, it's not a crisis (certainly not yet), it could be for certain businesses, sectors or even countries, but we don't know yet and won't for some time.", "631" ], [ "> I don't know about that, I think it was a pretty significant factor, definitely amoungst the top 3 issues for most voters voting for Brexit I would guess. Had a quick look at Lord <PERSON>'s poll and immigration is the second highest reason for voting leave at 33%, with making decisions for Britain in Britain being first at 49%. \n\nJust for clarity, voters who were driven by issues around immigration are not also racists . The arguments around immigration were generally aimed at white, European immigrants for starters and focused on employment, housing and house price rises, wages and social service/local service spending. You'll recall Lord <PERSON> (chairman of the Remain campaign..) arguing that one of the downsides of voting leave would be the need to pay low skilled workers more for example. Throw in the fairly large portion of various BAME communities that voted leave as they saw FoM as unfairly discriminatory against non-EU immigrants. So of that 30% some where almost certainly driven by racism and xenophobia, but then we are talking about a minority of a minority.\n\n > In the other questions 81% of leave voters agreed Multiculturalism was a force for ill and 80% said immigration was a force for ill.\n\nThat's arguably a better indicator, although if you look at the data tables it becomes slightly less clear cut given the majority (of both remain and leave..) supporters selecting the middle ground of what was a 10 point slider, and there being more age correlation (and so the remain/leave split being more associated with the age split).\n\n > According to this collection of studies immigration is the second or first most common \"single reason\" for voting for Brexit.\n\nIt was the second most common reason to be seen as their primary motivation for voting leave, and so about a third or leave voters voted with that in mind. But again, that's not something you can map to racism directly.\n\n > I am not sure what your issue is with that. \n\nMy issue (again...) is that we are conflating racism, with any reasoning to vote leave.\n\n > 17.5 million people voted to leave, in 2016 when the population of the UK was around 65 million. That's like 27% of the population. We can see from the tweet that roughly 26% of the population would be considered intolerant towards Muslims, forgetting about other forms of racism that might contribute to voting to leave because of fears of immigration. I don't think it's a huge leap to conclude that the leave voters could still be largely made up of intolerant people voting due to fears around immigration. Obviously not the full 26%, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was 18% of the intolerant people contributed to the leave vote which would still be a significant contributing factor to the leave voters...\n\nAnd the remainder voted remain? My point would be that the leave vote almost certainly (even just on an age split) contained more people who are racist or xenophobic, and that that was a driver to some degree for some. It is not however what drove most or even a significant majority of leave voters to vote leave, and a similar (although likely smaller) minority of racist/xenophobic voters voted remain.\n\nRacism and xenophobia are consciously and unconsciously pretty prevalent in the UK, I'd like to think we've made some decent progress in tackling them, but they remain a factor, but racism is (believe it not, even among people who arguably are racist...) not popular. I won't get into the whole post-race racism debate, but it's a really important point for the brexit referendum. It makes little sense that people vote leave because they didn't like BAME people, or Muslims, it was pretty damn clear that leaving the EU wouldn't reduce non-EU migration (and could increase it..), and that is broadly born out by the post-brexit polling on attitudes toward migration, race and islamophobia etc..\n\nWere some voters motivated to vote leave by racism and islamophobia, absolutely, some likely unconsciously. Was it a significant factor overtly or subconsciously in the leave vote? I don't think the evidence supports that, or rather, the evidence would suggest that practical considerations that don't rely on race, xenophobia and islamophobia drove decision making.", "564" ], [ "> Edit: meaning... no offence but I don't see what a survey conducted from Oxford Uni, about emotional psychology has to do with r/Yorkshire. As much as I'm glad to see people helping them out!\n\nCompletely get that, it was passed because we hadn't had one since the NHS COVID-19 APP Survey from Imperial. Oddly I think I'd be right in saying that we see way more requests from Cambridge and Oxford than from anywhere else, the odd one from Sheffield, and I think I've seen a York and a Hull one too. \n\nAs an aside, what do you think about the NHS/Covid one ([here](_URL_0_))? That one was passed largely because it seemed like it might actually be reasonably important and relevant for once (rather than someones dissertation project), but not Yorkshire specific?", "234" ], [ "Sorry... Did you miss the last decade? The idea that the EU acts as some sort of significant moderator of national government policy is pretty daft. It has significant competencies in areas like trade and market regulation, but most of the problematic notions in UK politics, from <PERSON> to <PERSON> tended to sit outside of the EU's competencies. Even looking at the EU now, do you see any significant claxons going off in countries with more batshit governments? In poland over abortion laws and the judiciary, Spain over Catalonia and all the rest of it?\n\nThe UK knows how to be a country, there are no massive issues in that regard and the impact of leaving the EU, while somewhat significant in terms of UK/EU trade isn't close to being, or likely to be catastrophic..", "437" ], [ "Assuming that's what she'd be charged with, the sentencing guidelines are here: [_URL_0_](_URL_0_) and pretty broad.\n\nI can't find source data but the Sun (yeah..) reported that about a third of drivers (a bit over 260) involved in fatal accidents and convicted didn't end up with a custodial sentence, that included 30+ people who were convicted of causing death by dangerous driving (The rest would have been for lesser offences...).\n\nSo its far from impossible that she'd have received a custodial sentence, but its also not a given.", "24" ], [ "> We'll have to agree to disagree. People are still incorrectly blaming Labour for the global finance crisis in 2008.\n\nTo be fair that is at least partly because <PERSON> apologised for failures in financial regulation in the run up to 2008 crash, and appeared to take some responsibility for it, not least the issue around how Labour presented the economy before the crash. To be clear, Labour were not responsible for the crash but (having spent a lot of time canvassing in 2010...) people felt that Labour had failed on the economy for not mitigating the impact and seeing it coming.\n\n > The Tories have mismanaged so many things economically since then and continue to do so. \n\nSure, Austerity was a complete shit show, but again, it was sold as necessary and people bought that. \n\n > Brexit is economic mismanagement but people love the Tories for it.\n\nNo, it's not, it's an ideological reaction to a political and economic union, with some negative economic consequences. It does however return the competencies needed to manage the UK's domestic market to the UK. It does allow the UK to interlink trade and foreign policy and it removes the UK from the wider EU policy agenda (And the entire political union..). \n\nYou can obviously disagree as to whether that is a good thing or not, but it unquestionably hands additional tools to manage the UK economy to UK governments. \n\nThis isn't after all about the current government, but all future governments regardless of party or policy platform.", "365" ], [ "It goes both ways. It's often credited with having powers in areas it doesn't and considerable powers it does have are downplayed. I mean it's a fair question to ask 'how can the EU be powerful and weak at the same time', but it is answerable, the EU has a lot of power around its exclusive competencies (Arguably more than is justifiable given the democratic deficit), those powers are broad and deep and do mean that EU membership means handing off significant control. But it has very limited powers in others. \n\nThat doesn't mean it's all powerful in all areas, nor does it mean that it has no powers.. The take back control narriative was pretty much focused on areas where the UK did have to hand off control to the EU after all.", "437" ], [ "Oh come on, surely this is something worth actually talking about rather than blowing off with a shitty response? \n\nIt sort of cuts to the core of the whole brexit issue, the areas where the EU has influence, where it has actual power, and where it hasn't were pretty relevant to the UK leaving the EU, and continue to be relevant going forward (Especially in terms of how the UK uses those powers). \n\nYou might disagree with my points above, but you could at least attempt to address them, if only because you seem to feel that the EU was somehow quite significantly important in the UK being able to act as a country (something that leave voters would agree with to a certain extent, albeit not in the same way..).", "564" ], [ "Because you seriously don't know what powers the EU had (The exclusive and shared competencies devolved to the EU, the treaty commitments from members, the ability to legislate and cause members to legislate etc..)? \n\nOr are you just looking to have me spend some time pulling together a long list for you, so that you can turn around and say that actually you don't think that the UK should be responsible for those things anyway, or that pooling them is better anyway.\n\nHappy to that together for you if you really need it, but it seems sort of silly and I'd honestly assume someone with a view on the UK's EU membership would have at least a passing understanding.", "437" ], [ "That's obviously a different question, but sure.\n\nBroadly the EU has a fair bit of a tension between its member states and itself, member states retain significant control (as a group..) over the direction of the EU and what it acts on. The EP is a bit of an afterthought to a certain extent and even the processes around governance and the commission are somewhat in flux and subject to the council. In short, the bits of the EU we vote for (so MEP's) don't really have a lot of control over how the EU makes use of its competencies and devolved powers and can't act independently. Member states (via the council) do, but with far less scrutiny and in a manner that makes it hard for electorates to hold them to account.\n\nThat makes the EU a venue for forum shopping (allowing member states to enact policies that apply nationally, but would not be possible within a countries own democratic process) and with little ability to prevent or reverse those policies going forward. It also means that MEP's and so voters voting for them can't set the direction of the EU. The Commission (which is supposed to be sort of indirectly elected, via the EP elections was also supposed to sort of moderate that, but we just saw that fall to bits in 2019.\n\nIn short, in some areas there is too little representation of the electorate in decision making, and in others, the elected elements of the EP have too little power relative to the states. While all in the EU has powers that arguably 'bust' some of the foundational principles of its member states (From the primacy of EU law through to the idea that you can't bind future Parliaments..). \n\nSo the EU being able to legislate for and cause the UK to legislate, to require the Member states to implement a Value Added Tax or for the EU to be able to weaken net neutrality in a member state despite existing legislation that passed via a normal democratic process would all be indications of powers in excess of democratic representation.\n\nYou can also see where that has fallen apart a bit on the EU's exclusive competencies in relation to trade. The EU has had a bit of a mare with complex agreements and member state sign off in the face of popular political pressure. The solution the EU has taken is to avoid that (by splitting complex agreements into the elements that are EU exclusive competences and those that might need ratification). \n\nNow personally I'd argue that you can fix most of that with a bit of integration, a transfer of some additional powers from member states to the EU and indeed that that is necessary for the EU to meet its potential. But I'm also not sure that I'd want to be a part of that EU.", "437" ], [ "Fair enough, in that case doe the list in brackets above cover enough? You could thrown in market regulation as a pretty massive one, the requirement for VAT, FoM (given that's a favourite of some...), CAP and the CFP.\n\nObviously none of those now sit with the EU with the UK out of the EU, and the EU can no longer legislate for the UK nor require the UK to legislate.", "631" ], [ "> Which exclusive competencies would you argue the EU has arguably more power than it needs\n\nI'd argue that the EU needs more powers (and essentially more exclusive competencies), not less to meet its potential and function properly, but I'd also argue that it lacks the popular support to have more powers handed off to it..\n\nAs it is most of the more problematic power the EU exercises (outside of trade and commercial policy ) is exercised via shared competencies in terms of regulating the internal market. That's a fairly massive issue and you the use of directives and regulations in that are are are one hit (once governments agree that the EU can regulate, that power effectively sits with the EU, and member states can do little to reverse it, well, bar leave anyway). The VAT directive is a good example of that, but you could arguably pick any.", "437" ], [ "Sure.\n\nAs an aside, I also get the 'remain and reform' argument with the intent to address the above (either by tightening or loosening the EU/UK relationship) I just don't see it working well as the UK tends to pull in a different direction to the core EU and was already on the periphery (Something addressed to some extent by the '<PERSON> renegotiation'). All in it's quite a complicated subject though, a bit like discussion about regulation, the specifics are relevant, the raw 'volume' is often less so.\n\nAnyway, cheers for that.", "631" ], [ "> I mean hasn't it been shown that we've had the ability to reduce immigration the whole time and yet haven't used that power? Immigration is a non-argument when talking about the EU.\n\nNot really. Some people have made some relatively poor arguments that suggest the above and apparently struck a chord, but the absolute bulk of EU migration to the EU has been well within the Treaties,. \n\nThat is to say that the people who moved to the UK absolutely had a right to, and acted in accordance with their obligations to exercise their treaty rights. We could have implemented a registration system and an ID card system (although essentially for everyone, not just EU migrants) and that might have meant some really small number of EU nationals might have been removed for not complying, but it wouldn't have had a significant impact in migration levels.\n\nI mean unless you are a Daily Mail reader and think EU migrants are coming for benefits (which isn't a thing anyway..) and not working (while also somehow taking all the jobs...) the argument that the UK could have limited EU migration significantly is pretty much nonsense.\n\nFoM is a treaty right, member states can't constrain it beyond what the treaty says, and it gives people the right to live and work anywhere in the EU. That's a good thing, that's how FoM (And indeed the four freedoms generally) have to work. You can't allow individual member states to pick and choose how they apply those. \n\n > And as for the fishing policy, that's another thing that's irrelevant to the huge majority of the country, can't say it affects the lives of any apart from 10,000 or so. Still, we could actually have elected competent MEPs to properly argue the case of those fishermen instead of showing up every few months to put on a show.\n\nSure, I'd actually argue that the issue with the CFP is the EU failing to make it sustainable and the politics actively overriding the science on quotas, but it's not some massive issue.\n\nI'll pull a quote from my other reply in this thread though:\n\nAs it is most of the more problematic power the EU exercises (outside of trade and commercial policy ) is exercised via shared competencies in terms of regulating the internal market. That's a fairly massive issue and you the use of directives and regulations in that are are are one hit (once governments agree that the EU can regulate, that power effectively sits with the EU, and member states can do little to reverse it, well, bar leave anyway). The VAT directive is a good example of that, but you could arguably pick any.\n\nThe EU has significant power in regulating the internal market, it's a shared policy, but where the EU has regulated, member states are then subject to that regulation. Member states and the EP have a little more say in that at least, but obviously member states can't reverse it (so if a Tory/Labour government agrees to a slew of market reforms the next Labour/Tory government can't change them..).", "631" ], [ "> Take back control was mostly used in immigration narrative and false truths like straight bananas etc were being used to ridicule it.\n\nIt was used in relation to migration, and to market regulation, the latter being quite a massive thing. It was also used around CFP, CAP and VAT. Those are quite a lot of fairly major things, that were part of the powers devolved to the EU.\n\n > UK did not choose to exercise their rights to control their borders and deport non economy contributing EU citizens who overstayed more than 90 days for example. \n\nThat's true, but the absolutely vast majority of EU nationals in the UK were complying with their obligations under the treaties. For the UK to enforce registration or ID requirements, it couldn't have discriminated against EU nationals either. So that'd be a massive shift for the UK and an unpopular one. For pretty much no impact. \n\n > UK also had a seat at the table in the EU, with significant influence and could (if it was willing to), lobby and shape the EU policy. \n\nSure, but it was only one country in more than two dozen and it was on the periphery. No-one is claiming that the UK didn't have influence, the issue raised was a lack of control and a lot of power handed off to an EU that even at the best of times wasn't particularly popular as a political project.\n\n > To paint it as a simple hapless rule taker is bending the picture. \n\nSure, but that isn't how it was painted. The argument was that EU membership required too much control to be handed off to the EU as a body and that pooling sovereignty to the extent required by the EU was excessive.\n\n > Hence \"taking back control\" is in my eyes a pure propaganda slogan and not much else. Its is more like \"giving up control\"\n\nIt was a campaign slogan, so was 'Remain and Reform', 'Stronger, Safer and Better Off' and 'Yes to Europe', that doesn't invalidate the underlying issues and discussion though.\n\nEU membership does require handing off sovereignty and acting collectively, it does mean control in some areas shifts from EU members to the organisation as a whole and you will find any number of arguments from pro- and anti- (And in between..) people about the problems and issues with that. It's not something that can just be dismissed.", "564" ], [ "Yes, the UK could have limited migration from accession states from 2004 to 2011, it couldn't have done so in the run up to or after the referendum though.. There weren't permanent measures it could put in place It couldn't have limited migration after 2011. Oh and obviously migration after 2011 was significantly higher (as in it more than doubled) after 2011..\n\nAs a side note, had the UK government decided to change its mind (say because of a change in government or circumstances) it also couldn't have reapplied controls and limits on migration from the accession states either (and did apply restrictions on Bulgaria and Romania). \n\nIf you are saying that previous governments could have somewhat reduced migration under very specific circumstances, from some EU states, up to 2011 I'd agree with you, but I'm not sure that's really what:\n\n > we've had the ability to reduce immigration the whole time and yet haven't used that power? Immigration is a non-argument when talking about the EU.\n\nWould suggest is it. Unless you think the UK could retroactively apply restrictions...", "631" ], [ "Depends on where you are, I've lived in Germany and France and bits of the UK, there are always bits of variation. The UK is shit when it comes to cycling infrastructure, but arguably where I was in Germany, the motorway network was worse (congestion and roadworks..) than it is around Sheffield, the road network was mixed. That said that reverses in other parts. You also have really poor parts of all three where you see very significant issues.\n\nThat applies across the other areas you've talked about too, especially in terms of housing, education and healthcare. And most countries have something that they excel at. I am also pretty conscious of the 'grass is always greener' thing too, Germany was great for eating out cheaply I really miss that, France had fantastic food in supermarkets more consistently there are a slew of things I'd like to see in the UK from both. That said, when I was in Germany banking was a pain in the arse, I spent more on food, and you forget that vegetables are a thing when eating out, in France I'd look at things like setting up a phone contract, or managing my admin as nightmarish compared to the UK..\n\nThe UK tends to be ranked in the middle of the pack when it comes to its peers, but if you shift priorities somewhat you can basically shuffle most of those large countries (like France and Germany), so all in I don't think the UK is significantly worse than most of its neighbours, or significantly better. \n\nEssentially if you live somewhere for a bit you get more of an idea of what works and what doesn't I suppose, when you remember it you tend to remember the good bits and it makes it hard to come to a rational comparison. If you compare data, you have an issue in how you determine how to rank/weight elements.", "841" ], [ "> It is true that it was not possible to impose restrictions later, but the UK was one of the strongest advocates of allowing those countries in quickly.\n\nThe UK government was (I'd agree with them too, but I don't have an issue with FoM), there was plenty of opposition at the time and since though.\n\n > By regulating in the beginning, the disruption of the labor market could have been limited. Don't underestimate the effect of following friends who had already settled in the UK and advertised that way to come too.\n\nSure, but by 2005 there wasn't really anything anyone could do about that, so in terms of people arguing now that the UK could have remained in the EU and limited migration, it doesn't make any sense. The argument people are pushing is not about what happened in 2004, but rather that the UK could have been more scrupulous about checking on EU migrants going forward. That'd have made almost no difference. \n\n > Just like Brexit, the UK often goes for maximum damage.\n\nErm? Firstly migration from the EU has been broadly a positive and brexit isn't about to cause maximum anything.", "631" ], [ "> About ten years later, immigration caused social unrest. Many countries saw that coming.\n\nRight, but given we don't have a time machine, there is no particular way for the UK to go back and change that, and so no way to change the issues going forward as part of the EU, where it doesn't have control over FoM\n\n > I think differently, but everyone can have their own opinion.\n\nSo to be clear, you think that a significant portion (so what, 300k or more each year) of EU migrants are not complying with the requirements under the EU treaties and the UK could have barred them? \n\nCome on, you are entitled to your opinion, but that's a particularly daft one unless you only read the daily mail.\n\n > \"You're entitled to your opinion, but in my opinion, you suffer from the material disadvantage of being completely wrong.\"\n\nExcept if you look at things like the projections of the impact, the data we have. Or to put it another way, I'm not wrong.", "437" ], [ "There is also a tendency for people to oversimplify where they don't have a decent understanding of all the factors involved. You see it all the time (even in engineering..) where counterintuitive steps are needed to solve an issue. Where you have a lot of moving parts, and quite a few of them don't respond predictably (or factors like confidence and institutional inertia play a part).\n\nA fresh set of eyes (Especially those belonging to a half decent analyst) are often quite useful, but people also tend to revert to type and see every problem in the frame of the problems they've solved in the past.\n\nYou see that quite often in engineering/IT crossovers around things like legacy systems, and failures to understand the cost of change, the value of reliability and so on.\n\nOr to put in place a shit analogy, you don't need a knife expert to tell you not to leave sharp blades lying on the floor, but depending on the environment, and other surfaces available picking up a blade might not be the immediate action to take either, and an expert who has worked in the field, and dealt with a similar problem before might have a bit more insight.", "575" ], [ "It does depend on the funding stream, but if you look at total EU structural fund spending across the UK, it's still a drop in the ocean both regionally and nationally compared to national spending (And that' snot surprising..). On an annual basis even Wales (which saw the highest level of funding) didn't see billions of pounds worth of funding from the EU (but did see billions of pounds worth of infrastructure spending from government).\n\nYou can absolutely find specific projects where the EU has spent significant amounts of money, but overall EU structural funds are a very small part of UK infrastructure spending and arguably they aren't that much more effectively targeted (And again, they are relatively expensive)", "631" ], [ "> This is interesting as until 3 years ago I was in the \"never change anything without need\" camp. More recently I've been working on software with actually malicious design (one of my fellow engineers more or less pointed me to the chaos on day 1 in hope I'd do exactly what I did and declare Jihad on existing systems). I'd tear that shit up every day, you just need to fully understand and be able to control how transition happens and crucially be able to go backwards. I think the business has benefitted from an active approach on this front.\n\nHa, I'd largely agree with you. My view would generally be to ensure that there is an understanding of the change being made and that change should derive a benefit or extend life. The issues I tend to run into are changes for the sake of change (we need to upgrade software/hardware because new versions exist, not because there is a feature requirement, or a risk of not being able to get parts etc..) and, for want of a better word, fads (and especially fads that create additional complexity). \n\nOh and prioritisation is a bastard too, well done, all the W2k boxes are now running something modern, now maybe we should think about having backups of these operationally critical systems...\n\nAnd yes, transition planning should always, always include sensible regression plans and preferably be part of a longer modernisation roadmap, and that regression plan shouldn't just be about the immediate change, but allow regression when it turns out someone missed something in a week or a month, or that we do something different during the winter maintenance cycle etc..\n\nIn short, being static is not a virtue, change for the sake of change is not a virtue, planning and preparation prevent piss poor performance, priorities should include support systems and, last but not least, change should be driven by business need (which includes resilience), not just operational needs (so features). But damn I do like shiny things too, but I like them best when they work.", "575" ], [ "I think the issue that people had with FoM was with the volume of migration to the UK and the inability to manage that from within the EU. Personally I think FoM (as it relates to workers) is the biggest loss that the UK will face from leaving the EU, but that isn't to say that it doesn't and didn't come with issues and create pressures.\n\n > British media is looking worse and worse. I have become supporter of Brexit recently and less supportive of the EU signing the deal.\n\nWell I'd argue that the EU and UK are better off with the UK outside of the EU and a partner to the EU so it would seem we are of a similar opinion.", "631" ], [ "> You seem to keep returning to looking at the UK as a whole when we are discussing infrastructure investment in the poorest areas, \n\nI'm looking at both, you did say that large chunks of the UK receive more funding from the EU after all. I would agree that some of the poorest areas saw additional money from the EU that they wouldn't have seen from the UK.\n\n > which the EU funded at a higher level them the UK government. \n\nSpecific projects yes, but I don't think that you'd find a large, poor area that saw a higher level of EU funding than UK funding. National funding tends to absolutely dwarf EU funding even in areas where UK funding is lower than it should be.\n\n > Remember that half of the total spend on infrastructure goes just to the South East of the UK. Also if the UK is better at funding these projects as you claim, then why are funds that would have been worth billions to improve the poorest areas of the UK being replaced by funds 50x smaller?\n\nThe UK should be better at funding these projects (the cost of the funding should be lower for a start). That said, I haven't seen the detail on the replacement funding and would be surprised if funding were 50x lower.", "841" ], [ "> The 50x smaller comes from the UK government talking about spending in Cornwall compared to the equivalent from EU funding. \n\nFrom what I've seen that's all been pretty much speculative, and nothing about a 50x reduction in spending (half has been bounced around) and that's before the full spending outlay and proposals have been finalised IIRC\n\n > Should also point out that after 2 press releases talking about replacement funding the UK government keeps insisting that nothing has been agreed. The UK should spend a lot more on infrastructure investment, often it seems to be too little too late.\n\nI agree with that entirely, the Tories have traditionally been shit at this but there is arguably an opportunity for them in every sense, to do the right thing at this point.\n\nNone of that obviously supports the notion that the UK spends less than the EU, but rather that the UK should be spending more (and should at least match and frankly preferably outstrip EU spending, while targeting it more effectively and attaching fewer strings).", "631" ], [ "> Surely there must be some data protection information aimed at students of this age out there. \n\nThere is! And some schools/teachers do a fantastic job, I think others don't really frame what surveys are for or how they should work (you can sort of tell by the questions). \n\n > If the collective agreed on these surveys would it be too much trouble to send them out some links to give them tips on creating secure surveys that ensure anonymity? (Out of interest I'll probably have a look but someone might already know)\n\nI try and do that anyway, the issue is usually that the survey is already up and live (and they've had parents/siblings etc..) and so there isn't a lot of scope for change. Tends to be more of an issue at GCSE level (the issue at A-level tends to be poor survey design and often what looks like a last minute 'oh shit I need to....' thing).\n\nThat said, if you wanted to put something together as a guide we could take a look, adapt if neccesary then drop it into the wiki and link it from the rule. That'd be something of a public service I think!", "779" ], [ "Here is the data on EU structural fund spending by country: [_URL_2_](_URL_2_) for the 2014-2020 period (so not annual..). Here is an overview of UK central government infrastructure spending over almost the same period: [_URL_0_](_URL_1_)\n\nIs that sort of what you are after? Beyond that we'd have to compare specific regions. It's not exactly controversial (given the size of the EU budget and total EU spending in the UK) to suggest that national infrastructure spending is vastly higher, it's also what you'd expect from a country. The issue tends to be around priorities.", "841" ], [ "You seem to be conflating EIB loans with EU structural funding, the difference should be relatively obvious, and yes the UK will lose access to the EIB but it's not like the UK (at any level) has issues gaining access to funding..\n\n > I'm no fan of the EU, but one thing that can never be denied is the significant amounts of infrastructure and development spending that came from it.\n\nBut when we are comparing it to national spending, we do actually have to compare the amount spent, governments (in pretty much every EU member state) spend more directly than the EU spends on infrastructure. It's not controversial nor problematic.\n\n*Edit: As an aside, I didn't downvote you (quite the reverse), and I'd suggest that understanding and discussing the interplay between all of these things (the EIB/EFSI/Structural funds, other subsidy spending, as well as the EU's funding streams, the various rebate mechanisms, the objectives and processes for funding..) is quite important. It's shit not being able to have a discussion without someone being downvoted below the visibility threshold.*", "631" ], [ "> Are seriously trying to make a point about the difference between a loan and funding??? What are you even talking about????\n\nOf course I am. Public and private borrowing from the EIB is rather different from EU funding, for a start it has to be repaid..\n\n > Hahahaha. The same government which claimed that it doesn't have a magic money tree???\n\nAnd still spent and borrowed vast amounts of money?\n\n > Lets be realistic, where will the gap likely be plugged?\n\nThe borrowing from the EIB does not create a gap, its borrowing. The funding (via structural funds and the various other funding streams) will almost certainly be met by UK expenditure, the terms of that and how it is spent is still however not clear.\n\n > We all know the answer, conglomerates, funds and the likes of China, India, America and Saudi/UAE. If you think that same investment wont come with a caveat I have beachfront in Birmingham to sell to you. If you think a Libertarian Tory government is going to spend any money it doesn't have to then you're living in lala land.\n\nSorry.. What? We are talking about a range of different things here. UK Government spending and borrowing isn't reliant on China, India or the US and UAE. The UK has domestic banks and government investment and loan facilities supposedly geared to replace the functions of the work from the EIB, and you have a direct replacement for structural funds too. There isn't a practical issue with access to lending or funding.\n\n > LOL stop. You don't know what you're talking about and the links I posted refuted everything you have to say. We dont have to compare anything. The EU contributed signficantly to infrastructural projects in this country. Unless you're going to act as if there is something you know that the House of Lords and LSE does not.\n\nThe argument isn't that the EU didn't contribute, it's that it spends vastly less than the UK government does... If you want to argue with someone about the EU funds not contributing, I'd suggest finding someone who is making that argument.", "841" ], [ "> This is a comparison of no meaning. You said EU contribution to the UK infrastructural spend was minuscule.\n\nNo I didn't say it was miniscule, and I was talking about relative spending. The UK spends vastly more than the EU did in the UK, and is looking to replace the EU's spending.\n\n > A third (in a single year) is not miniscule by anyone's metric. \n\nAnd isn't EU spending, it was EIB lending... So Public and private borrowing, you understand that that has to be repaid right?\n\n > Again, you're digging a hole. Even moreso you're considering the EU, where at least 25-26 member states have economies smaller than the UK.\n\nErm.. How is that relevant?", "841" ], [ "> You seem to be trying to make an arbitrary seperation between a fund and a loan.\n\nIt's not arbitrary. The UK borrowing to fund infrastructure is not the same as the UK receiving funding from the EU. The latter is part of the UK's contribution to the EU budget anyway and comes with conditions on spending, the former is borrowing that the UK has to repay.\n\n > What point are you even trying to make? Whether it came from the EIB in the form of borrowing makes absolutely no difference.\n\nThat EU funding in the UK, is significantly smaller than UK spending in the UK, and that borrowing via the EIB is.. borrowing and has to be repaid? \n\n > The EU's contribution the UK infrastructure spending is not miniscule\n\nThe only person suggesting its miniscule is you though..\n\n > and try to dredge up obscure points about the EIB (which isn't even the largest contributor) doesn't make your point work either.\n\nThe EIB isn't a contributor, it's a lender, the UK government and public/private borrowers use it to get loans that they then have to repay with interest. That's not EU spending, that's UK spending.. At least with the structural funds that's money coming into the UK.", "631" ], [ "> Exactly. People \"felt\", but they were wrong. No government saw it coming.\n\nThat confidence and perception is important though. And it was a fairly abrupt shock to what at that point was a view that Labour were managing the economy in an extremely competent manner (which arguably was true..). You are more likely to get a kicking for failing at something you are supposed to be good at after al.\n\n > And once again, demonstrates our population is incapable of properly holding our government to account.\n\nNo, it doesn't, it shows that a lot of people agreed with the government, the electorate will only ever hold a government to account for what it sees as its successes and failures, not on some external standard.\n\n > Yes and almost every expert everywhere says that regardless of that, it will be bad economically.\n\nAnd? The driver there wasn't economic, it was as much about consent as anything else and in context the party that 'supported' the popular view is hardly going to be punished by those who hold that view.\n\n > Your proposition was that our voters hold our governments to account for economic mismanagement.\n\nMy proposition is that governments are held to account by the electorate when they are seen by that electorate to have failed.", "365" ], [ "> There would be a lot less contempt for Leavers if Brexit was not a ####show.\n\nI'm not suggesting that people shouldn't be raising hell about the issues that they see, or making whatever points they want about trade friction, the loss of FoM, government planning, the FTA etc.. My point is that the way it is pushed by the parent is as bad as, and does about as much good as the whole 'TraITorS!' bollocks from some on the leave side in the past. It's divisive and only really works online and in a bubble..\n\n > For me (and other Remainers), those disadvantages outweight the advantages of leaving EU's SM/CU (not that there are many).\n\nSure, otherwise you'd have voted leave presumably!\n\n > Only once you recognise the above, you will understand why Remainers are unlikely to get behind the Brexit cause, despite the government promise that Brexit is now somehow finally done.\n\nWhich is fine, but again not getting behind the Brexit cause and perpetuating a bullshit picture of leavers (and in many cases of brexit, the whole 'there are no good reasons to vote leave'/'they are all to thick/racist/fascist' narriative is pretty absurd. It means that there is less engagement, in fact it arguably makes engagement impossible, leading to this rot of weird outcome where people think that making frankly unfully, largely sour at this point digs, based on a half arsed caricature is somehow useful.\n\nThe parent can comment however they want obviously, but this does put them in the same category as the idiots who spout shite from the leave side, or indeed any of the other fringe groups that attack anyone they don't like through crass caricature and exaggeration.", "564" ], [ "Ha, nothing wrong with the thickness of my skin, I'm not about to go and cry in a corner, the issue is that it nukes discussion and drives polarisation. I think I can argue that on all of this, I've generally pushed back in this sub where I've felt it viable, but the sort of daft nonsense like that from the parent likely means most won't bother because rightly they'll see the sub as too far gone and any sort of discussion as pointless.\n\nIt's worth calling out just for that, bubbles aren't healthy, if only because they lead to people being confused that large numbers of people who don't share their view actually exist and oddly enough that warps their view of society and the likely outcome of things like elections.\n\nIt's like the <PERSON> supporters who were absolutely certain that <PERSON> had won,and that the could only have lost if there was some sort of conspiracy, after all, everyone they knew, interacted with online and so on voted <PERSON>.. How could he possibly lose?!", "282" ], [ "> Ban anyone from Eton from ever holding public office.\n\nI'm honestly not sure that'd solve anything..\n\n > Restrict MPs to a maximum of two terms.\n\nThat's a mildly interesting idea, although I'm not sure that it's a great one, the argument is usually that term limits are a gift to lobbyists, and obviously people not being able to keep hold of good MP's they like is a potential downside.\n\n > Rejoin the EU\n\nLets not.\n\n > Make tax avoidance illegal as tax evasion and all enablers criminally responsible.\n\nTax avoidance would include a whole slew of things that the government is trying to incentivise by offering tax incentives. That includes (as the parent below pointed out...) things like ISAs, Pensions and a slew of individual schemes, but also things like the inducements for R & D spending, supporting training and apprenticeships and so on. Crack down on tax evasion by all means, but people being able avoid tax by doing things we want them to do (and where the incentive is paying less tax) seems like a good thing.\n\n > Low cost high speed broadband for all.\n\nYou probably want to start with lower cost, higher quality housing to be honest, but low cost high speed broadband being more available would be good too.", "236" ], [ "> Let me give you an example why many Remainers think of many Brexiteers as dense as steel:\n\nYou understand why that goes both ways though right? Apart from the fact that you've tried to boil down a complicated issue into a stupidly simple one, you only really go on to misrepresent the issue. \n\nDid leaving the EU introduce additional barriers for fishermen? Yes it did, but the immediate impact was that those additional barriers were unexpected and exporters were unprepared. It's not impossible or even that much harder to export fish to the EU now, it does involve more paperwork, and it seems a lot of exporters were not ready for that (not all, but certainly some).\n\nIn short, it is a combination of issues, teething troubles because of the new processes and actual friction, the teething troubles will disappear in time as people get used to the processes, the friction is permanent.\n\nAnd of course it is right to say that the UK now has more control over both its waters, fishing quotas and regulation of its market and is better able to provide targeted support to the industry.\n\nIf you only read the most upvoted comments in this sub on that issue you'd however walk away with the false impression that somehow all fishermen voted leave, that the UK got no concessions on fishing, that fish and seafood can now practically not be exported to the EU and that all the fishermen are stupid and should have seen this coming. Never mind the frankly schizophrenic 'We sacrificed everything for fish, but also sacrificed the fishing industry for a deal' thing.", "631" ], [ "> You see, the friction is now permanent or until Labour reverses that.\n\nYes, I'm aware of that (although I don't see Labour taking a drastically different position on EU/UK trade). However the lack of clarity as to what would happen after the beginning of this year is a one off, the change is a one-off, people not being prepared for the new export requirements were a one off and so amount to teething trouble. You get the difference right? The bulk of the issues we've seen haven't been because UK/EU trade is massively more complex or harder to manage (there is new paperwork, there are some specific issues), but rather that people were not prepared to deal with it and in some cases didn't..\n\n > On paper we do have more control (not sure for NI waters though), but as soon as we try to reduce their quota, they introduce tariffs. And I am not even mentioning British fishermen who used to fish in French and Spanish waters.\n\nIn reality we have more control.. And you may find [this](_URL_0_) useful in the context of market access and the potential for retaliation.. \n\n > As fo targeted support, that £350mn balance is getting smaller by the day.\n\nThe money 'saved' by not having to pay into the EU budget is essentially spent anyway. On the plus side, the UK is no-longer part of an integrating political and economic union that is frankly not popular.", "631" ], [ "Setting aside the media response and how that fed into the election, there certainly was an issue in terms of <PERSON> attracting those harder/further left-wingers into Labour, who had previously not seen the Labour party as sufficiently left wing, who also represent that very much anti-semitic left (that I assume you wouldn't disagree exists?). \n\nI certainly saw that. Some of the people who I'd seen on the local political fringe (that I'd come in contact with during the occupy protests etc..) who would actively talk about incredibly fringe issues and conspiracy theory, as well as treat anti semitic tropes like jewish media control, or jewish control of government, arguments around the holocaust as real (or even a given) were suddenly Labour members (or more often supporters). It was actively problematic. \n\nA fair number of them dropped out again over the period (both while <PERSON> was leader and when it became clear he would cease to be), but for a period it was an active and pretty visible issue locally. I doubt it was limited to just the areas where I'm active too.\n\nThat obviously doesn't equate to <PERSON> being anti-semitic, or supporting anti-semitism but it certainly does represent an issue for Labour.", "763" ], [ "Looking at the screenshot, that seems to be a \"The EU care workers set to lose right to stay in UK” are the ones who aren't aware of the settlement scheme and so have taken no action whatsoever to engage in it. \n\nWhich makes the Indy headline (surprisingly..) a tad misleading in the sense that it appears to suggest that they are being told they can't stay, rather than having either decided not to, or have not yet sorted out the admin so that they can (unlike 5m or so people who have..).", "564" ], [ "Under most circumstances I'd completely agree with you, but in the context of the settlement scheme, there has been a vast amount of coverage, targeted advice and informational campaigns, news (both good and bad) about the implementation and roll out and so on. It's not quite the same as keeping abreast of slightly obscure immigration changes. Throw in that the application process appears to have been designed to be simple for once, and translated into a slew of languages.\n\n\\ > I feel that if you would have the right to stay if you did the paperwork, the government should actively support you to do that.\n\nSure, but the issue being pointed at is people not realising that they need to apply, or deciding not to.", "914" ], [ "> We are already changing absolutely everything about how we live. Easing off our young peoole is completely off the table? \n\nNo, it's not, but in the context of it being Sunday, and Schools starting from Monday the practicalities of what happens in the next few days are pretty relevant..\n\n > We are talking about universal basic income, and permanent changes to our economy, but a term remote schooled is completely bonkers because SATs?\n\nAgain, no, the issue is that the impact is happening now, that the Tories are in government and that we aren't in a position to create significant meaningful change to the entire economy over the next few days. Talking about UBI and permanent shifts in the economy are something we need to do, as well as implementing sensible changes going forward, but this isn't about having a discussion about what might happen in a year, or four with education, it is the impact that is felt from the kids that have missed most of a school year this year, in the context of the current system.\n\n > If that's what must be done, destroying their mental health (I can't sit exams, can you?), Then don't phrase it as their ability or their future. Phrase it as our broken system is still torturing them needlessly.\n\nAnd it's not going to change in the next 24 hours, or the next week, while the damage done is already having an impact.\n\n > Other countries do not to this stupid dance around kids assessment, or indeed 17 year olds. They just don't. \n\nI'm not disagreeing with your suggestion that we need to see changes, I'm saying that given the current government and given the current situation, we need to have short term solutions as well as long term aims.\n\n > Universities are remote, for crying at loud!\n\nWhich doesn't help someone like my neighbour who has two kids with one computer between them, and the large numbers of other people in the same or similar positions. Remote learning is awesome, but it doesn't work for many (and skews, again, toward being more of a problem for the poorest, who have the least room, less access to quiet spaces and equipment) and we have and are seeing that in how well kids are doing in school. And, unfortunately, how kids are doing in school will impact them going forward regardless, never mind if we see another GCSE/A-level fiasco in the summer.", "762" ], [ "As someone else pointed out, it's the same advice the CDC are offering:\n\n\"Still, it’s not without precedent: Health authorities like the C.D.C. have previously said that if it’s impossible to give doses of a vaccine from the same manufacturer, “providers should administer the vaccine that they have available” to complete an injection schedule.\"\n\nThe UK would appear to be taking the same approach as the US at the very least.", "374" ], [ "MacMillan is headquartered in the UK and has a slew of international subsidiaries and branches (the parent company is German..). I assume a US court will be able to act on their publishing in the US, but not necessarily elsewhere (depending on how receptive other national courts might be to this approach..). \n\nIt might also be a bit late if he was paid in advance (and I'd sort of assume he was paid an advance of some sort either way).\n\nIn any case, I picked up a copy today (in the UK) so it'll be interesting to see whether whatever amount he is supposed to get from the sale ends up with him or somewhere else..", "662" ], [ "In a UK context they tend to go hand in hand.. But generally an old house thing. \n\nThe rest of Europe had to do a fair bit more rebuilding in the late 40's early 50's. Indeed about 20% of all houses in the UK are pre-1919, and only 24% built after 1980. Mine is 150 years old next year and it's on a street with 30+ more of the same age, in an area where there are hundreds of roughly the same type of 'two up two downs', plumbing, electricity, gas etc.. is all stuff that has been retrofitted, hence the coal cellar. As an aside, my Mother in Laws house is closer to 500 years old and in a square with two dozen other houses of similar age, and has a collection of cellars from when the house has been altered, extended and so on over the years.\n\nThe biggest pain in the arse is that doing anything with the cellar (like say, removing the rubble in half of mine and essentially adding two usable rooms below the first floor...) tends to be problematic and expensive as pulling that much weight out of the base of the house can cause structural issues.", "69" ], [ "> It's hard to interpret what <PERSON> is doing as aiming for anything else. He's not negotiating anything, \n\nAs I understand it, there are ongoing discussions happening, they just don't seem to be getting anywhere (both internally in terms of the backstop and with the EU, the EU has said it'll listen, but don't seem interested in anything so far suggested in terms of dropping the backstop, for obvious reasons..). \n\n > he's got nothing he can get past Parliament\n\nNo, he hasn't, but then the only two things that could even be presented to Parliament that avoid a no-deal at this point are the existing WA (which Parliament already rejected and <PERSON> doesn't like) and potentially a revocation, although that also won't pass Parliament and obviously isn't something the government wants. That leaves the legislation that is already in place and so a no-deal exit or an extension (via some mechanism) which doesn't avoid a no-deal so much as postponing it. \n\nObviously the problem with an extension is that it doesn't really move anything forward, unless MP's are willing to either look at the WA again, revoke or push something like a second referendum or a GE. Of those, only the GE seems even mildly viable.. The utter lack of progress since the last extension really underscore that and I don't think that all comes down to Government not shifting, it does include issues around the EU having been very clear that there will be no renegotiation and MP's remaining in fairly entrenched positions.\n\nEssentially that's a massive mess. \n\n > and he's made no effort at reaching out or building consensus. \n\nI get the impression that there is no consensus to be had at least with the WA available and the positions being taken in Parliament. I don't know if there has been any real attempt to open discussions since May vaguely tried to way back when, although I'd expect MP's to be talking to each other regardless.\n\n > To me, it seems like his actions so far are most consistent with going for a no deal exit and finding a way to blame the EU for it.\n\nI'd agree that his actions so far are most consistent with us ending up with no-deal (because he has been clear that he won't keep the UK in even if there is no-deal) and I'm sure the Tories will try to blame everyone else, the EU included, Labour, as well as the Lib Dems and SNP.\n\nAll that said, I still haven't found a 'no-deal' first supporter in real life, which is consistent with the 'no-one voted for no-deal' argument and indeed the debates and discussions before and after the referendum. So I do find it somewhat alarming that polling is apparently throwing up reasonably large numbers of them.", "236" ], [ "> Not according to the EU (though I can't find the source I got that from now - will update when I do). And why would they waste the time, when he hasn't got consensus here? They've been down that road with the UK already.\n\nI'm reasonably sure that there are ongoing discussions at a technical level at least, as a friend of mine who works within the permanent German delegation in Brussels still seems to be permanently pissed off about it and is desperately trying to shift jobs. Whether that's multilateral, EU or indeed whether they are useful, or moving forward, or just treading water is a different matter again of course.\n\n\n > True, but one that is unpickable with a sensible referendum.\n\nIn theory sure, but I'd bet that the 'sensible' part of that would be hard to deliver on. Assuming a majority for a second referendum could be found, I doubt that Parliament as it is at the moment could agree on a form, question or proper terms of reference.\n\n > Perhaps, but then it's still moronic to push ahead with a no deal Brexit on that basis.\n\nIf there isn't a deal available and seemingly no route to one, and a lack of support for revoking, what's left?\n\nMost of the 'solutions' I can think of that make any sense involve time travel at this point.\n\n > Yes, same here. I know of a couple of friends-of-friends on FB who are no-dealers, but they've gone totally off the deep end. It doesn't seem like there could be enough support for it to get anywhere near a majority, but nobody seems to think that finding that out would be a good idea.\n\nMy local UKIP perma-candidate (who pretty much defines 'swivel eyed loon' isn't even a no-dealer, which is saying something as he is one of those confused souls who really doesn't know what is going on and is primarily worried about foreigners, house prices and that he is being massively defrauded by VW (who were set up by <PERSON> don't you know) because when he fails to maintain his shitty van, it costs a fortune to repair..", "564" ], [ "This needs to be said more often, there are so many other bars (including the use of discretionary powers by the Crown in that scenario - given that the Crown is held in check by Parliament not the executive) that it simply becomes absurd. In theory the courts have an insane amount of power and discretion too, but we don't generally pre-emptively curtail them and they hold themselves within an understood framework.\n\nThe current situation exists because Parliament doesn't want legislation it passed to take effect, but doesn't have the support or the will to repeal that legislation or modify it to create a different default outcome. That is a far bigger issue than the prorogation or any potential outcome from this case.", "236" ], [ "> In the current situation of course, Parliament is withholding those actions to try and avert a different calamity.\n\nIn the current situation Parliament doesn't want legislation it passed to take effect, but doesn't have the support or the will to repeal that legislation or modify it to create a different default outcome. It doesn't want to use some of its more significant means of holding the executive to account, including allowing a GE or a VONC because it is concerned that it would lead to a political outcome it doesn't want.\n\nThat sort of undermines to at least some extent the claims that it is prorogation (rather than the political issue at hand) that is the problem for Parliament.", "236" ], [ "> you're trying to ignore the nationalist element that has always been at the heart of the discussion:\n\nNo, I'm not. Not at all.. What you are describing above encapsulates the different outlook the UK has when compared to the likes of Germany and France in terms of how we view the EU (I'm basing that on having lived in both countries..) but it doesn't only inform a right wing position and it doesn't counter where opposition to the EEC and EU came from or indeed continues to come from.\n\n<PERSON> position informs <PERSON>'s position on the EU as much as it does <PERSON>'s..", "437" ], [ "There are a fair number of <PERSON> supporters around, I know a few Tory voters and they seem to be broadly happy with him, and I'm in Yorkshire. The leave supporters I know seem to view him in a fairly mixed way, the harder-leave types seem to like him, and a few of the more moderate leavers seem to think he'll pull something out of a bag to take us out of the EU, but not with no-deal (although the details on the how tend to be lacking). \n\nHe's genuinely popular though, and it shouldn't be surprising he is seen as fairly moderate (although that is being chipped away at). There is a lot of outright hate of him too and that's understandable too given he poses an arguably bigger electoral threat (and so the worrying possibility of another half decade of Tory government..) than <PERSON> did.", "365" ], [ "Sure, and <PERSON> opposition to entry into the EEC was at the time in line with Labour positions, not Tory ones. Again, I'm not suggesting that there were no right wing eurosceptics or that there are no left wing eurosceptics now, but the 1975 referendum was forced by the left, opposition to EEC membership initially came far more strongly from the left... That has shifted more recently, right wing Euroscepticism rose with UKIP (and outside of the conservative party, the largest right wing grouping..) it hasn't been close to being the primary driver. It's also why you had a lot of left wing Eurosceptics voting leave in the referendum (a minority, given that the right had taken over the issue to some extent by 2016).", "564" ], [ "Yes, and there have been left wing eurosceptics opposed to the EU (in the form of the common market), opposition to the false choice between European regionalism and internationalism (see <PERSON>) and so on.\n\nBut it was the left that fought against entry, pushed for a referendum and argued for reform and against UK membership up to and including the period that covers <PERSON> government.. \n\nI'm not disagreeing that the right has included elements opposed to the EU for a long time, I'm pointing out that the drivers initially were left wing not right wing and that changed effectively with UKIP in terms of prominence.", "285" ], [ "The same ones that <PERSON> and people like <PERSON> have been making for a long time. The EU is at its core a regionalist, capitalist entity pushing a neo-liberal economic policy without sufficient democratic constraints. It pushes a particular model of economic development, has in the past either actively pushed to reduce worker protections or stood aside while member states did so and so on.", "437" ], [ "Not really... The EU minimums are a good backstop, but EU member states and non-EU countries often exceed them, union protections vary significantly across the block. Essentially you'd be right to say that worker protections across the EU are some of the best in the world, but largely that's down to national action and varies a lot. You'll also note that the EU pushed Greece to weaken protections as part of the bailout process and hasn't intervened (indeed called for liberalisation..) when countries (the UK included) has reduced protections.\n\nThe reason we have good worker protections is because of unions, the Labour movement and the Labour party, not the EU, lets not get confused about that..", "437" ], [ "> The UK joined the EU in 1973. Since the mid-1970s, the European Union has played an important role in protecting working people from exploitation and combating discrimination, but it was not until the 1986 Single European Act that there was a significant increase in the volume of health and safety Directives. That Act aimed to facilitate the free movement of workers within a single market, in particular through the new Article 118a. It abolished national vetoes in a host of areas relating to the single market, increased the legislative powers of the European parliament and made the first commitment by member states to create a \"European Union\"\n\nRight.. And I don't disagree with any of that, the EU was handed competencies in that area after all and has done important work to protect workers in the common market, and facilitate free movement. It also doesn't in any way contradict what I said above, nor does it support your notion that the EU has the best protections in the world. It doesn't, individual EU member states have stronger protections in many areas, as do non-EU members.\n\nAnd I note you ignored everything else from the post above too.\n\nBut just to get back to the point, do you somehow still think that the left wasn't the main driver in the 70's for Euroscepticism and that the right only took over that mantle with the rise of UKIP after the New Labour years? Because you seem to have wandered way off the point.", "437" ], [ "Do you actually think that's what you've done in this thread? \n\nYour arguments so far largely haven't addressed the issue, and you seem to be confused at what you are arguing about or what constitutes 'exposing' anything. \nIndeed your arguments come across like those of an anti-vaxxer who thinks that evidence that a single vaccine has caused an issue for a patient proves all vacines are bad, or a climate change denier who thinks that a cold winter proves climate change wrong..\n\nBut you know, whatever floats your boat.", "687" ], [ "> The problem is the supposed protections that have been put in place for workers have had the opposite effect in practice as they have made it increasingly worthwhile for employers to circumvent them which employers are doing by issuing fixed term contracts, using self-employed freelancers, temporary staff, etc. Greater protection for workers from the EU and/or states have had a more singular effect than any other factor in reducing workers job security than anything else.\n\nI'd disagree with that, I'd argue that a combination of weaker than required workers rights (and I'd point at the UK in this, the EU minimums are poor and fall well below that in many areas) and a simultaneous push to create a flexible labour force have created too many opportunities for employers to abuse things like FTC/ZHC's, self employment and so on. You can also throw in that the decline of the unions, and indeed the decline of mass employers has left the Labour movement with less of a direct influence on both policy and the economy (and some of that comes down to anti-strike and anti-union legislation as well as breaking up large public employers and replacing them with fragmented private ones). \n\nI'd stick with the notion that the EU is broadly OK, but far from particularly great when it comes to workers rights, they only form one part of its primary focus (which is broadly the market..).\n\n*Edit: As an aside I'm surprised you got this far into this thread..*", "334" ], [ "Which doesn't explain why euroscepticism has been either a close majority or in the majority since the UK joined, the high point for EU/EEC support being the 1975 referendum. You are treating the referendum outcome as some sort of surprise based on misinformation, and the press pushing it and ignoring the underlying issues that you even alluded to with your points about <PERSON>. The EU isn't popular in the UK for a slew of broadly ideological issues, there isn't the same view of what the EU should be in the UK when compared to France or Germany. Hence why there is opposition from the left and right (and that it started largely on the left).\n\nAnd again, opposition to things like shared sovereignty is not based on a misunderstanding as shared sovereignty is a core component of EU membership. The same goes for opposition to the EU on the basis of FoM (Personally I like FoM but it's not misinformation driving that either).\n\nAnd yes, we've touched on it, and you seem to have gone off at a tangent at every opportunity or failed to actually make a point.", "564" ], [ "> You are putting the cart before the horse. Things like FTC's/ZHC's/self-employees/etc. have never been illegal but were not introduced until after worker protections became excessively onerous. They were a reactionary response.\n\nThey represent a push for labour force flexibility rather than a way to counteract or circumvent protections though, the reason they have been largely allowed is that the outcomes are seen as positive (you can add things like longer probationary periods as a means to reduce employer costs of hiring too..).\n\n > But this too had an inverse (and to the left, counter-intuitive) effect on job security, quality of life, etc. which increased from when <PERSON> crushed the unions until the end of <PERSON>'s first term.\n\nSort of, you probably want to look back to the 60's rather than <PERSON>, given that by the time we get to <PERSON> we are already seeing the tensions caused by a fairly major economic shift in the UK and indeed EEC membership. And throw in issues with increased inequality over the period too.\n\n > I'd put it the other way around, with the EU preferring workers rights to the interests of the market.\n\nI really wouldn't, the EU sees workers rights as one component in managing the single market, and as a lever that can be used to reduce costs or push given policy aims. The market comes first (before workers rights, the environment or indeed consumer protection), with some of those being used as leverage in NTB terms to protect the EU market from external factors too.\n\n > I was having a parallel discussion about patriarchy with the individual you are engaging and as I don't downvote comments myself I thought I'd go through and upvote all of the comment's they've been downvoting which is where I came across your thoughts here and I thought \"that's a point worth engaging with!\"\n\nHa, right. Fair enough. It feels like I'm rather far down the rabbit hole in context. Having glanced at the other thread, I think I'll limit my replies to the parent somewhat though, it seems like a bit of a pointless exercise..", "334" ], [ "That still wouldn't work from what I can see about China's force mix, and the published UK/French numbers. \n\nDon't get me wrong, the Ohio is a potent weapon, but then so is a UK Vanguard, and the french Triomphant fleet for that matter. Throw in the large Chinese land based ICBM's and the preference there for large yield warheads and the numbers don't really work.", "753" ], [ "No, [the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017](_URL_2_) gained Royal Assent on the 16th of March 2017, that's the one authorising the PM to notify under Article 50. [The European Union Withdrawal Act](_URL_0_) (that [repeals the European Communities Act 1972](_URL_1_) on exit day, among other things, and takes us out of the EU) received Royal assent on the 26 June 2018.\n\nIt's the latter that is more relevant here, not least because it is the legislation that effectively creates a no-deal default (it's also what the 'Letwin-Cooper Act' and 'Benn Act' build on.\n\nA fairly important distinction...", "236" ], [ "> Ok, clearly this country is more fucked than I thought if people can't read numbers on a graph.\n\nI can, I'm wondering if you can...\n\n > So almost every fucking poll ever produced, gives remaining the in EU a clear lead. Yet here you are saying it's not clear. Open your eyes mate.\n\nIt fluctuates, between the margin of error and don't knows it can go either way and in the context of polling, where remain has had a lead it hasn't been a 'clear' one by a mile.\n\nI'll add that if you look at voting intention (which seems to be what we are talking about here) parties with explicit leave positions seem to have managed to pull together more of a vote share, most of the time, and that's assuming Labour are all remain, which they aren't (although for the purposes of a GE it would be silly to put them into an outright leave position).\n\n > Number of people who want to Remain > Number of people who want to Leave.\n\nYeah, and that doesn't seem to be the case..\n\n > And the gap is getting bigger everyday.\n\nReally? If we look at February of this year we get one of the biggest remain leads, 48% vs leave on 38% (14% DK/WV) and yet now it's back to 44% each way... That would seem that views are trending about where they were before the referendum.\n\nIt is not at all clear that even in a remain vs leave referendum that remain would win (in fact I think its somewhat unlikely..), and this poll gets you no closer to that.", "564" ], [ "> Go ahead and plot all data of the remain vs leave questions on google docs, invite me to the doc and then you will warrant a reply and full response.\n\nOr you know, use any of the many sources that already do.. Maybe even from the same [source you used](_URL_0_)? \n\nIf you look at the point around the actual referendum, and now you'll note something interesting, and of course if you look at the last few months you'll note a tightening not an increasing remain majority. And again, February of this year (it's an outlier, bit its there) is probably the closest to your claim. But then the fact that it's an outlier and that remain support in the same sequence has dropped relative to that point it sort of kills your follow up.", "564" ], [ "> But flashing your high beams in that manner can also be interpreted as the cammer letting the other guy use the gap in traffic to overtake.\n\nIn Germany? I've only ever seen it used (and used it...) as an indication that the 'flasher' is intending to overtake.\n\nBut I totally agree that the honking and flashing and weaving at the end was clearly unnecessary and dangerous. Frankly I'd want to get well away from the guy who pulled out.", "523" ], [ "Are they all the same bike? If not that isn't going to work in a practical sense, and there are enough cameras around to make the old plate cloning approaches really risky and indeed that's why people now clone plates for the same vehicle (make colour and year) for short periods only and avoid ANPR cameras (which is hard if you live anywhere other than the countryside). \n\nIt'd be interesting to see what was going on there as presumably the only saving would be on road tax (so at most £91/y) given it's relatively cheap and easy to switch insurance between similar bikes, and possibly an MOT but again, they are relatively cheap and easy for a bike.\n\nEssentially they'd be risking a lot for not much in savings.", "318" ], [ "Assuming a population of 5.5m, a sample size of 1003 adults means a 4% margin of error with a 99% confidence level assuming a decent sample. Given it was a poll by Survation, and they are member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules it seems unlikely that that is problematic. \n\nIndeed the biggest issue being raised is the question, which seems (based on the EC and various other sources..) to be less problematic than a yes/no question would be.", "185" ], [ "**Sorry, your submission has been manually removed by a human!**\n\nDepending on the submission, we are directing some Brexit posts to the stickied megathread on the top of page (in Hot view).\n\nPlease post your submission there as a comment.\n\n\n\n*If you believe this message is posted in error, [message the /r/uk team](_URL_0_) and include a link to this post. Please don't do this lightly, we're very busy and have likely acted correctly.*", "804" ], [ "So no then? \n\n > I have genuinely not heard one argument with an actual, tangible and fact-checkable benefit so far.\n\nHow...? I mean if you said you felt that the benefit wasn't important or didn't justify leaving the EU then sure, but you can't honestly say that you have not heard one argument with an actual, tangible and fact-checkable benefit so far. It's absurd unless you add 'that I agree with' to the end of the statement..", "564" ], [ "> Well, what is one tangible, fact-checkable benefit of brexit?\n\nUK governments will be directly accountable for the UK's trade and commercial policy? Governments can change VAT rules (or get rid of VAT)? Governments can legislate and be held accountable for policy in those areas currently sat with the EU? I mean the list is pretty damn long, it has been repeatedly talked about in the context of the referendum, it's fact obviously fact checkable and true..\n\nIf you want to stick with things that the government has actually done in the 18 or so days since the transition ended, I suppose you could go with the UK can and now has entered into trade agreements independently, can reduce VAT on sanitary products, is able to manage its own marine resources etc..\n\nGiven that everyone has been talking about the massive changes that come from EU policy areas returning to the UK and whether that's actually worth it, I don't quite see how you'd fail to be aware of it.", "631" ], [ "> Because not one of those things is a benefit. Most of them will actually see us worse off than being in the EU.\n\nIn your opinion none of those things is a benefit, and on balance they might leave the UK economically worse off in the short term.. That doesn't invalidate the fact that future governments will be accountable to UK electorates on economic and trade issues that currently sit with the EU, it doesn't invalidate the benefit of the UK having control of its own sales taxes or control over its own waters, subsidy approaches, environmental regulations and so on.\n\nAgain, you are conflating your opinion with some sort of hard and fast set of facts. You are confusing a subjective opinion with an objective one.. \n\n > They're benefits in the same way that quitting a great job with a pension and benefits gives you more time to concentrate on your garage band who are definitely going to make it big because you really believe in yourself.\n\nIf you want.. I'd disagree, but sure. It's a bit like leaving one job where you were making a decent amount of money but you didn't really like it and didn't like where the company was going to retrain and do something different.. It might well come with a short term cost, but it'll leave you in a better place going forward.\n\nBut again, I think what we've actually established here is that you think leaving the EU is a wrong choice (which is fine.. you get to decide what you think), not that there are no benefits from leaving. You just don't think that they benefits of leaving outweigh the costs, and in some cases don't think the benefits are benefits.\n\nBut surely you can see that that is based on your opinion and your priorities, not some objective truth? Surely you get that more than half of voters in the referendum and a very large portion of the country disagrees with you, because they have a different view? You understand that that doesn't mean that there are no benefits to the UK from leaving the EU?\n\nOr are we going to go round and round with the 'well I disagree so it's not a benefit' thing, because if we are we can leave it there. It's just unfortunate (and honestly I don't get how people can hold a secure position on anything if they can't also see the argument from the other side...).", "564" ], [ "> Edit: Lol, imagine downvoting me for that...\n\nIt's a little bit infuriating sometimes to read through a thread like this. The pattern is horribly predictable, someone makes an absurd claim (like 'I've never seen a valid argument for brexit/no-one has ever said what the benefit is of leaving the EU/no-one has ever explained to me why they voted leave') and all the actual responses that address that get downvoted below the viewing threshold while comments like:\n\n*Because <PERSON> from Boston couldn't stand to hear someone speak in Polish on the bus anymore mainly* (via u/GasTheToryScum in this thread..)\n\nEnd up at +33 because they happen to play to the prejudices of a majority..\n\nAnd then tomorrow there will be a thread about how leave supporters have all gone very quiet and never defend their position..", "564" ], [ "> To be fair if you were swayed by facts and data in the first place you'd have voted remain so it's a pointless exercise.\n\nThat pretty much says it all doesn't it? It's not an issue that there are different facts, we agree on the facts, you presumably don't disagree on the distribution of powers between the EU and its members, but you literally can't grasp the notion that having UK governments, accountable to UK electorates being able to exercise them could be seen as a benefit.. So in your mind that simply doesn't count.. \n\nIt's absurd. Do you look at Scottish independence in the same way? You see that there is no strong economic argument, that it is an issue of governance and legitimacy, and then decide that all of those arguments are bollocks and so there can be no benefits around Scotland leaving the UK? \n\nThe bubble you are inhabiting is as dangerous as any other, if you don't understand why other people may take a different position to you (and assume that it must be because they are incapable of making the right decision..) then you are going to find yourself perpetually confused when people disagree with you, because they have different aims and priorities..", "852" ], [ "The current parties are effectively already coalitions, and anyone advocating PR is going to have to explain exactly what approach they want to take, because there are both costs and benefits to a PR system, and they vary depending on type.\n\nI'd love to see a more proportional outcome, but I'm not sure I want to lose the geographic link, I don't want to see minimum thresholds, and I don't want a system where independents have no chance, or where every election involves me voting for a party that then ends up doing something completely different because it entered into a coalition with a set of parties I very much didn't vote for, not least because it reduces accountability..\n\nAnd as an aside, the whole 'Make Votes Matter' slogan is incredibly annoying, votes matter now, pretending they don't drives apathy and damages the cause for electoral reform in my view.", "207" ], [ "> There is a very clear and contrary reason that Scottish independence is anathema to brexit: Scottish independence allows Scotland to remain a part of the largest and most efficient trade union in the world (the EU), whilst maintaining their sovereignty (mostly by veto, but also by WTO law, which all WTO members (regardless of EU membership) must comply.\n\nSo what you are saying is that it's reasonable for Scotland to leave the UK because it could, potentially, assuming it applies,the EU allows it and people in Scotland want it, to then join the EU at some point? Obviously Scotland can't 'remain' part of the EU, it has left, even with it's majority remain support, it has significant numbers of people who are eurosceptic, and I'm not sure that support for the EU on terms other than what Scotland had as part of the EU will be as attractive.\n\nAnd again, in purely economic terms, rejoining the EU would do little to mitigate the damage that it'd do in leaving the UK (and at that point presumably leaving CPTPP too..).\n\n > Scottish independence gives Scottish government the benefit of remaining EU membership.\n\nIt'd mean Scotland could apply to rejoin the EU yes, assuming that's what a future Scottish government decides to do and people in Scotland support..\n\n > I'm not totally sure what your point is about Scottish independence. Could you elaborate?\n\nThe arguments around Scottish independence have been around governance, sovereignty and control of their own destiny. Those are all valid, important and very real reasons to take an action that is pretty sketchy economically and could (would..) create significant economic costs. Because as with the UK's EU membership, economics is not the only issue.", "852" ], [ "> Have a look how many independents there's been in the last 50 years. It's quite clear that independents have practically no chance under FPTP. Those few that do win it tends to be over a single issue and their support drops come the next election.\n\nThey have more of a choice of pressuring individual candidates in a Parliamentary and forcing issues onto the agenda. And that single issue element isn't exactly unimportant either.", "207" ], [ "> My vote does not matter. I will get a labour mp and three labour councillors, no matter what I vote for. \n\nBecause more people vote for those candidates than the candidate you support presumably...?\n\n > While we were in the EU there was a possibility my vote mattered there because of pr though\n\nIt'd have meant that your region would be more likely to have someone from a party you voted for, assuming that you voted for one of the major parties. The threshold to actually get a single MEP will have been vastly higher though (and that's before we get into the issue around what powers MEP's actually have...).", "207" ], [ "> Ind. will include any Independent candidate elected as that or a Indepdent collective, like Independent Alliance in Ireland 2016. Ind.+ will include parties on or less than 5 seats, if <PERSON> won Ashfiled he'd be as independent as <PERSON> if she won East Devon. Maybe there could be a better way of putting it. Speaker/CC not counted as Ind. or Ind.+.\n\nVoting for an independent candidate in context would be voting for a specific candidate in my area that might be standing on a specific issue, not voting for any independent candidate... \n\n > Something that most forms of PR have, including the two we use in the UK like STV (NI Assembly, NI Councils, Scottish Councils, Welsh Councils) and AMS (Welsh Senedd, Scottish Parliament, London Assembly)\n\nThe key point there then is to talk about which PR approach people want to take, AMS preserves the constituency link (or can do) and I'd have few issues with a top up system (as that'd mean people get to vote for specific candidates, but the eventual Parliament is still more or less proportional.", "207" ], [ "> You acted like our system aides Independents, this can be shown to be wrong looking at the UK alone, Ireland just shows how much more wrong it is cause PR helps Independents.\n\nI'm saying that some forms of PR make standing as an independent candidate almost impossible, which means that all the politics is left to parties and alliances, it creates a massive bar to anyone who thinks something is wrong and wants to do something about that. Currently the hurdle in the UK is a few signatures and £500, vast numbers stand at every election, a few get elected, all of them get to highlight some issue or other (or highlight why they shouldn't get elected..). \n\nIt's not just about who gets elected, or whether votes are shared out proportionally between parties after all, it is about candidates standing to represent voters. I mean if nothing else, with purely list systems you end up with parties potentially wielding vast amounts of power and being the arbiters of who can stand at all. But again, it depends on the approach taken.\n\n > As does STV or d'hondt many systems do so your only issue is it's general for PR not a specific system?\n\nSTV in an MMS system can do the same (although you end up with multiple representatives within a large area.., d'hondt can, but again, it depends on the implementation. Few people oppose a more proportional electoral system, the issue is almost always around the detail. You can have a system that is nominally proportional, but by the time you've included a threshold, or create significant barriers to entry you can end up with an outcome that is less proportional than the average under FPTP, more to the point you can end up distancing the political process from the voter if most elections result in coalition forming processes that deliver policy platforms that don't representa a majority view (the whole post coalition regret thing...).", "207" ], [ "> We are where we are at with the union facing dissolution not really because of Brexit but because there's no sign a lot of leave voters will admit to being had. If they don't then the country is fucked. Normally people who don't take a step back will end up doubling down and being had again and again. The country cannot realistically survive that.\n\nNothing about EU membership has changed since the referendum.. Someone who voted leave for the reasons that (according to the polling at least) were apparently the drivers of the leave vote would presumably vote leave now too.. It's not as though there has been some massive shift, or some unexpected outcome. The EU hasn't changed direction or structure, it still has the same requirements for members..\n\nWhy would informed leave voters feel the need to shift their position in that context? And before we get a 'most leave voters were not informed' argument, I'm sure that they were as informed as remain voters were.\n\n > I feel slightly more hope every time a leave voter makes an admission like this. For every one willing to do so a hundred are thinking the same way.\n\nPeople change their minds and that's a good thing, doubly so if they made a decision based on a false premise in the first place, but if you think that there is some mass reversal among leave voters, then it's not one I'm seeing. There is obviously concern about how the Government has handled the exit (although with a WA in place and an FTA it seems to have relaxed somewhat), but I don't see a sudden reversal or the notion that leavers have suddenly seen some unexpected outcome and are regretting their initial vote.", "564" ], [ "> Sure that doesn't change that our system is the same.\n\nNo.. Our system makes independent candidacy incredibly easy, it's hard to win any given election though. That's different (and our current system is hardly the ideal... I just don't want to lose elements of it that are positive..).\n\n > No they don't. I gave you the numbers before\n\nWhich indicate that a few get elected..\n\n > I mean a bunch of random nobodies getting a hundred votes isn't gonna change shit. There is literally only one candidate who's a Independent who can have any impact and she's failed to win three times on the trot.\n\nIt's participation in democracy though, people are voting for them so they have someone to vote for, they attend hustings and their votes count as much as anyone else's. And occasionally when there is an issue they are good on, they get elected, and even when they don't they can force other candidates to look at their issues.\n\n > Riddle me how that would happen.\n\nDepends on the system in use and the scenario.. And a barrier to entry could be independent of the voting system..\n\nBy the by, I think you might be confusing me with someone who doesn't want to see a more proportional voting system, or thinks the existing system is ideal, it isn't, but there are lots of small positive elements that I don't want to see thrown away, which is why the specific implementation is important.", "845" ], [ "> , though it'd be interesting to see if we could shift the <PERSON> window enough that the Tories were the far-right.\n\nIt'd be more interesting because presumably while it might, looking back, make the Tories appear far right, it'd likely force them to the left. I'd love to see that, but I think the only way we do is by getting Labour elected and then actually legislating effectively toward the left.", "365" ], [ "> Then let's push hard to stop torturing children with exams and focus on their wellbeing in school. And trust our young adults by reforming our grades obsessed culture. Prime opportunity to do that. Instead of pandering to \"but their grades\" at all costs. \n\nI'd love to see a lot of that done, but given we have a Tory government at the moment, given the impact on kids and education is already a thing, I don't quite see how we reform our education system and frankly large portions of our society over night, more to the point even if we did manage to do that, how on earth would that mitigate the damage done by kids losing a fairly large chunk (in terms of their total education) of some of their more critical time in education? \n\nOne of the reasons absenteeism was targeted by both previous Labour and the last few Tory governments is because it has an impact on achievement and capability quite rapidly, especially in core subjects. School closures of ten days or\nmore reduce achievement, with the biggest impact in maths.. That has a knock on effect all the way on.. It's not some 'but their grades' whinging (Although again, in the current system that absolutely will have an impact on A-levels, and so university entry and potentially future employment prospect..) it's about a real measurable impact on educational outcomes.\n\n > Grades are a means to an end, they should not dictate public health.\n\nBut education is a massively important factor in social mobility and future prospects, until we get to a point where grades don't matter and it doesn't matter that some of our kids have lost a fairly large chunk of their foundational education (And so large bits of relatively important knowledge and skills..) we are going to see a problem that impacts lives pretty severely.", "762" ], [ "> Well that would be an argument against thresholds.\n\nYes... It would.\n\n > Also most threshold cut offs are for regional seats only so if you can win a constituency seat you will also be eligable for regional seats, why parties like ACT in New Zealand have a constituency seat they try real hard for.\n\nYeah, there tend to be variable approaches (so national seats vs local vs regional) and in some cases they don't apply where a party gets a seat in one context, or there are top ups available.\n\nMy point is that I want a system that delivers a proportional outcome, but also maintains a low bar for participation.\n\n > Though yeah thresholds are shit we didn't have any when we had d'hondt for the EU elections.\n\nNo, although the cost of standing in an region for the EP is excessive in the first place and creates its own additional barriers, the UK emulating that for some of the mayoral races is pretty crap too.", "207" ], [ "> but could have been controlled, was never an EU problem, was our own government who decided that anyone from the EU could work here, it could have been controllled at any time and numbers limited, it was a problem made up that never existed, all stats show eu workers on average brought more into the economy than a uk resident.\n\nSorry.. That's broadly wrong. The UK could have limited migration from the accession countries when they joined for a period, but beyond that EU citizens have a right to work anywhere in the EU. The UK couldn't have limited the number of EU nationals coming to the UK, it could have checked more closely that EU nationals in the UK were complying with the requirements under the treaties, but the bulk were.\n\nYou are absolutely right that immigrants are a net positive for the UK in economic terms, but let's not try to present FoM is something EU members states can arbitrarily restrict to reduce migration.", "631" ], [ "> What the other guy is saying is with regards to people who voted for Brexit who were not well informed, and the move is clear: if Brexit happened today, without the lies about £350m/week to the NHS and all the rest, Brexit would not reach a majority.\n\nThat's really not clear at all. Again, if you look at the driving motivations behind the leave vote, the campaigning had faily little impact (most people on both sides made their decision before the campaigns..). If you held another vote now, with what we know in terms of the exit agreement and so the remain campaign couldn't campaign using things like grounded aircraft, economic collapse, massive unemployment and an immediate recession as arguments either the remain campaign would lose a lot of that 'its a massive risk' element too. Did the bus figure contribute? Sure, but most leave voters appear to have voted on substantive issues. \n\n > Some people voted for Brexit because they didn't know or understand the breadth of consequences. Some voted for Brexit because they bought into BoJo and others lies. Some voted as some sort of weird \"fuck you\" to <PERSON>.\n\nAnd some remain voters bought Camerons bullshit, some to retain mobile roaming, some because they don't like non-white immigration. By the by very very few appear to have voted as a protest vote. \n\n > Brexit only barely passed. If it happened again today, it would lose.\n\nNo. I don't think it would.", "564" ], [ "> To whom is it paid and who sets the price? How are competitors kept out? I thought these things were supposed to be decentralised. That's a large part of the point about blockchain cryptocurrencies, and being forced to use an intermediary who can impose a fee rather seems to defeat that.\n\nReally simply, you have to understand that cryptocurrencies are basically big long lists of cryptographically secure transactions that everyone agrees on (they include the creation of the currency and then where it goes). They aren't stored digital coins as such, the transactions are the important bit. Those transactions are held in a decentralised manner (although again, it varies by currency...), and essentially everyone has to 'agree' to every change (or the transactions diverge). The validators/miners add to those transactions, the block chain, and they verify each block. If you want your transaction to be recorded (and enough people to agree it happened..), you basically need to firstly get the transaction on the blockchain and then have everyone accept it as having happened, transaction fees are part of that, they are the small portion you offer to pay to someone to maintain or distribute that record.\n\n > Besides, there is no meaningful expense in calculating chained hashes, and the zero marginal cost should, given proper free competition, converge on zero cost (other, as I say, than for matching buyers/sellers on an exchange or converting fiat currencies). git does this all the time at no cost, after all.\n\nThe current cost of running something like a bitcoin miner is pretty massive, and with things like bitcoin, transaction fees aren't fixed, they fluctuate depending on activity (and again, you have some control in that you can jump the queue by paying more...). \n\n > Miners already got compensated by discovering the coin's hash anyway. And there is not any central registry in which to record the transaction in any peer-to-peer system..\n\nA wallet to wallet transfer still needs to be recorded on the blockchain, you can exchange a wallet with someone else, but then you are talking about off chain transactions (which lots of big transactions these days are, so that they don't impact the price..) but that's then the equivalent of me handing you cash, which also doesn't come with a fee..\n\n > That sounds like somebody's bullshitting somebody. It is certainly artificial.\n\nOf course it's artificial, or rather, the whole system is artificial... \n\n > I don't know much about bitcoin specifically, but I know enough about the underlying technologies to be deeply suspicious of the certainty of such fees.\n\nIt's worth looking at cryptocurrencies, (and blockchain more specifically) it's really fascinating, there are a whole slew of interesting issues around having a decentralised currency, with problems like double spending, blockchain splits, disagreement management (whether a transaction happened etc..), and the whole mining element to look at. \n\nAnd again, not every cryptocurrency is the same, I've lost track over time, but some are now more centralised, some geared toward rapid transactions, some toward anonymity, some toward reducing traceability, and some geared toward reducing the cost of transactions (and no doubt loads of other shite by now..).", "543" ], [ "> But as with the EU referendum, it should always have required a super-majority and a also subsequent confirmatory referendums.\n\nAs much as I don't want to see Scotland leave the UK, you can't require super-majorities for issues of governance like this. If more than 50% of a country actively disagree with the system under which they are governed (not the party, but the underlying system or constitutional settlement...), then it lacks legitimacy entirely, that undermines anything that that is carried out under that system.. \n\nThere is nothing wrong with confirmatory referendums down the road as such (Although it should be because there is something new to confirm, or there has been a significant shift in opinion..), but you can't stack the deck to the degree that you are suggesting toward the status quo and still be seen as having any credibility.", "852" ], [ "It's not even that simple, but even in that context, unless you take a Daily Express view that some massive number of EU migrants aren't working (which is false...), it'd make no difference. The vast majority of EU migrants exercising their treaty rights and coming to the UK were abiding by the requirements set out in treaty and subsequent decisions. It would have had next to no impact on the numbers of EU nationals coming to the UK, and the UK could set no meaningful limits as an EU member, on FoM.", "631" ], [ "> Well, you can, but whether it is reasonable to, much less wise, is another matter altogether.\n\nFair point, I'll rephrase that as 'I can't justify it based on what I see as important in a democracy'. \n\n > One possible test for whether a supermajority should be required is whether 'No' represents a safe, status quo option. \n > \n > It's hard to argue against that, for Scottish independence, remaining is the safe option, it's just not politically palatable for about half the population.\n\nYou'd have to define safe, and explain why the status-quo overrides a fairly core notion that people have a right to self-determination (Again, my view..). \n\n > In that case, the UK has not had legitimate government in a very, very long time, because it's rare that the winning party ever gets more than 50% of the popular vote. It's nearly always the case that, where there are more than two parties to vote for, more people voted against the winner than for it.\n\nNo, I was really, really clear. These are questions around the constitutional settlement and system of government, not a question of which party is in government. The difference is massive. There are absolutely groups of people (myself included..) that want to see changes in the way the UK is governed, but they are largely incremental changes, and I doubt that at this point there is a majority for any given change. My view of the UK's constitutional settlement or system of government doesn't change based on who is in government after all.\n\n > That's especially true under PR, hence why the need to form coalitions (and which is its selling point, to my mind). I know of only one exception: last year's GE in New Zealand in which Labour got the thinnest sliver over 50% of the popular vote. That's certainly a first since NZ's last FPTP election in '93.\n\nThe questions with PR are always about implementation. You have issues with legitimacy and accountability there too (you cand hand quite a lot of power to parties, and abstract a lot of the democratic choice if you are looking at proportional systems and expecting coalitions to be the norm, plus power imbalances around majority and minority members of a coalition, but I digress - and they are all solvable..).\n\n > Clearly, this is an absurd reading, so I don't think that lacking > 50% of popular support especially undermines the legitimacy of a party's governance.\n\nIt doesn't. 50%+ of a region voting not to be part of the country they are currently part of however, does. As does 50%+ of a country voting against or for a major constitutional change and that change being blocked by the votes of a much smaller proportion of voters.", "852" ], [ "Or rather where you vote for an MP not a party and there are 600+ elections not one big one.. We need a more proportional system, but frankly boundaries are always something you have to decide, and any proportional system probably needs to sit along side something that maintains a geographic link.\n\nNot all MP's from the same party are equal after all, and I'm not sure I like the idea of parties being able to use positions on party lists in elections as another tool to force conformity.\n\nWe really need to have a discussion about changing the way the UK elects MP's to some extent, but that has to include more than just a focus on proportional outcome.", "207" ], [ "> Although there should also be other changes too that I think are justifiable, like having a \"none of the above\" option as a legitimate box to tick instead of only being able to spoiling your ballot or not vote at all and being discounted entirely.\n\nThat's not unreasonable as it'd formalise a recording of those who weren't for or against, although I'm not sure how that'd really work given that NOTA would presumably be the same as voting against a change in practice (and in terms of outcome), even if someone intended it as a vote against the status-quo.. \n\nIt'd have to lead to something if only because if you had say 43% Yes, 46% no, 11% NOTA you suddenly have no majority support for anything and that undermines the legitimacy of the status quo too (although not to the extent of no-change after a vote against..). \n\nArguably the 'person equivalent' of NOTA for an election (so essentially re-open nominations...) is something we should have. Being able to say no to a slate of MP's to force another election might be quite interesting.. Although that's addressing a different set of issues.", "845" ], [ "**Sorry, your submission has been manually removed by a human!**\n\nYour selfpost concerns the Coronavirus. We are trying to keep the volume of these down.\n\nPlease consider /r/coronavirusuk or use of our megathread.\n\nYou might also consider the stickied megathread on the top of page (in Hot view).\n\nYou can post your submission there as a comment.\n\nLastly, on your specific question, I take it you've looked at the guidance about how settled and pre-settled status has been hit by COVID travel restrictions. See here: _URL_1_. If not, that might be worth a read too.\n\n\n*If you believe this message is posted in error, [message the /r/uk team](_URL_0_) and include a link to this post. Please don't do this lightly, we're very busy and have likely acted correctly.*", "804" ], [ "The core point however remains the same, there was a large amount of EU migration and UK governments were not able to use the same tools that they can for RoW migration to manage that (or shape it..). \n\nNow I think FoM is a good thing, but to argue that that is false, or to argue that the UK could control or limit migration under FoM as you did, is just as wrong as the Express presenting the appearance of a large number of EU migrants being on benefits (usually by conflating out of work and in work benefits..).", "631" ], [ "> As a matter of law, neither Scotland nor England (for that matter) has any right to self determination, so the question is not whether the status quo overrides a non-existent right, but rather whether Scots should have that right.\n\nThe reason I put \"Again, my view\" there was because I'd argue that regardless of whether it is a legal right, it is a fundamental component of any democratic system. Preventing a region, state or other sub-entity from a path that leads to independence, or preventing the electorate from making a decision on their own governance fundamentally undermines democracy..\n\n > Then there's the question of how Scots' interests are set against those of the rest of the UK and why Scotland's preferences should trump rUK's, even if Scottish independence is to the detriment of rUK.\n\nSure, but as per the above I'd argue that the need to take into account the interests of the UK as a whole, or the rUK's in relation to Scotland leaving ends at the point where Scots (or anyone else for that matter..) makes it clear they no longer want to be part of the UK. There is no good argument as to why a region that wants to be independent and has said so clearly should be held by a larger state because the larger state fears a cost. Again, that lacks legitimacy.\n\n > How is it reasonable for the 63% of Scotland who voted remain to impose its will on the rest of the UK when it presumably isn't okay for the rest of the UK to have a say at all on whether Scotland can and should leave the Union?\n\nIt isn't reasonable for 63% of Scotland to impose its will on the rest of the UK, and in the context of a UK wide referendum I'm not sure how it would. Scotland is part of the UK, the UK voted to leave, how individual regions voted isn't really relevant, it is an action taken by the UK as a whole.\n\nScotland leaving the UK however is not Scotland imposing on the UK, it is Scotland indicating that it is no longer part of the UK.\n\n > I appreciate that and I agree, but we're talking about political legitimacy and, in particular whether an absolute majority of popular support is a required threshold.\n\nI'll put it another way, as long as there is support for the constitutional settlement, that allows a government to win a majority of seats in Parliament, with less than a majority of votes overall, then there is legitimacy. That has been tested quite a few times (with things like the AV vote, but also votes on devolved parliaments etc.). The system and the constitutional settlement (including the set up of Parliament..) is legitimate, governments elected in that context are legitimate and have the right to govern.\n\n > One reason why majority support might not be an implied requirement is that no system enjoys majority support (as we saw with the brexit indicative votes). Yet we have to use something, even if more people are against it than who are for it.\n\nThe lack of a majority for a specific alternative might be the next best thing after a majority for a given outcome.. And yes, although more around Parliamentary breakdowns, brexit is a good indication of what happens when you have a set direction of travel, but no agreement on the specifics. Parliament did a bit of a piss poor job there.", "852" ], [ "> My local MP for a start.\n\nSo not in this thread then?\n\n > \"It creates strong Governments\". \n > \n > No what you mean is it lets a minority of voters wield 100% of the power.\n\nThere is an argument that FPTP creates stable governments (more often than not anyway..) because it makes majority government more likely, it makes coalitions less likely so you could argue that more people in absolute terms will get a government that does what they voted for. It does however, as you point out, mean that a minority hold a disproportionate amount of power.\n\nI will take issue with the notion that they hold 100% of the power though, they don't, the opposition in Parliament wields a fair amount of power and does act as a check on government, your MP not being part of the government doesn't leave them powerless after all, and governments have to hold on to that majority in the house (in both electoral and support terms..), so it is very much not a free hand, it is constrained by both opposition within the governing party and outside of it.\n\nIn short, it's far more complicated than just FPTP bad, PR good, the type of PR is important and the intended outcomes and aims of any reform are important too. I'd argue that a proportional system where a minority coalition partner can push a policy agenda disproportionate to its support base is also something that needs to be considered (and there are lots of interesting things around formalising coalition agreement approaches, or doing so before elections to ensure that voters aren't pushed another remove away from decision making..)", "207" ], [ "> I stopped reading there because you've clearly got a tizzy on about something.\n\nErm? OK.\n\nI was simply pointing out that I'd said I didn't think anyone in this thread was suggesting that the current electoral system was fine (indeed we seemed to be having a decent discussion...). \n\nAs to having 'a tizzy' I think the whole 'I'm not reading that because I found a line I didn't like' might possibly indicate that there is more of an issue at your end. Either way, that's fine!", "856" ], [ "> The authoritative record is decentralised, by being held in identical copies on millions of hard drives. You can run a bitcoin node if you want, if you have 300GB to spare.\n\nThat's basically the crux here and it's hard to conceptualise, it really is decentralised and the authoritative record is essentially whatever the most people agree is, and that can and has led to splits in a blockchain, where people then have coins on both chains!", "986" ], [ "> I would have thought all of those are reasonably well-solved problems in computer science. Certainly things like concurrency, transaction locking and problems equivalent to double spending are basic computer science 101. (Hah, inflation affects everything, so perhaps 201 these days.) Maybe one day I'll take a look at how cryptocurrencies apply those techniques.\n\nJust on this, they aren't when you don't have centralisation, when it really is decentralised with an absence of a central authority.\n\nEssentially the difference between this and version control, or simply using any sort of cryptographic verification is that the core aspect is that the transaction log, the block chain is held by a large number of people, where they agree to changes and record changes, everything seems pretty similar to any other decentralised system. Someone makes a change, it is propagated to everyone, everyone has the same thing again.\n\nHowever in this instance, there is no 'correct' authoritative list of transactions. Essentially, the current state of the blockchain is whatever the majority agrees it is, and they can (and do...) disagree. When that happens, you suddenly have two chains. Usually one dies (and the transactions beyond the point of the split become essentially meaningless). However sometimes both survive, so now you have two blockchains, with people holding 'coins' on both. If one pulls more people over, that one will tend to dominate and be sees as the 'original' whatever it is, while the other effectively becomes a new coin..\n\nThe same goes for the rules for any digital currency, if you get enough support, you can change pretty much anything about its operation. If you can't and try anyway, you split away as a different chain.\n\n > As you can probably tell, I am deeply sceptical about bitcoin. But then I'm also deeply sceptical about lotteries or, for example, horse racing. Some people find it fun, which is cool.\n\nI felt it had utility as a means of exchange and facilitating payments where there are barriers (indeed I had quite a lot of bitcoin, I used to demonstrate to people how you'd exchange coins, how paper wallets worked, looked at the transactions etc..), as an actual store of value.. Yeah, that's quite scary.\n\n > But nothing I've ever heard suggests that bitcoin is, of itself, a good thing or has any serious place in a substantial economy.\n\nBitcoin is way to volatile, but it seems to have become a thing in its own right, and as long as people see it as valuable it will remain so. How that looks long term is a very different question.\n\nBlockchains more generally are pretty decent, but if you look at the commercial implementations within banks and financial organisations, they all tend not to be decentralised, and at that point I'm not sure why (other than there being a lot of code out there ready to pick up and use) there is an advantage in using cryptocurrency rather than anything else..", "831" ], [ "> yes there was some lag before benefits began to be felt but we were there because of our prior mess, not joining them. We became the sick man in the 60's.\n\nYou can't really see the benefits in the economic figures though, and the impact (shock if you like..) was far greater than the impact leaving is predicted to have.. That's really quite important.\n\n > I remember what a shithole we had become all too well. The years following it began a period of vast improvement that lasted decades.\n\nFrom 75? Arguably the UK didn't do particularly well at all until the mid 90's and again, the level of inequality had jumped at that point. The 'improvement' didn't span the whole country either. Moreover, it's not like the UK economy suddenly shifted to a different level of growth from before, or that we saw more stability (although I was willing to believe we might have been there in 2004..). \n\n > This situation will extend the austerity period for another decade or more sadly.\n\nMore likely, the government will use spending to mitigate the issues that are raised. \n\nThe notion that before the EU the UK was in a state, and then on joining it all went well doesn't fit the economic data, nor does it really match economic history. The problem there is twofold, it tool a long time for the UK to restructure on joining the EU, that led to massive issues across the UK, some of which we are still dealing with. \n\nSecondly, the period just before we joined thee 'long boom' a really relatively long period of strong economic growth that started after World War II and ended with the 1973-75 recession.\n\nSo if you are going by the sick man of Europe thing, before it joined the EU, the UK saw a two year decline after significant growth for almost two decades, on joining the EU it saw two decades and of economic strife, followed by a decade of New Labour and boom, followed by the worst recession in a long time and a decade of Austerity and lacklustre growth..", "841" ], [ "> The only safe way to ensure that we don't get no deal is by ensuring that the PM isn't going to allow that to happen.\n\nThe only safe way to ensure we don't get no-deal is by agreeing on an exit deal, or deciding to remain. Everything else is tinkering around the edges until the EU says 'no' or Parliament fails to do something and the legislation that MP's already passed comes into effect.", "236" ], [ "> At least ensuring that we don't have a prime minister actively working to get us a no deal would be a good start.\n\nI thought the issue was that <PERSON> would be happy to renegotiate (which, other than MP's accepting the WA on the table is basically the only other way we get a 'deal') but would take the UK out with no-deal if that was impossible, rather than 'actively working to get no-deal'\n\nGiven that it seems unlikely that a GE would resolve the current impasse, and given that everyone looking to 'prevent no-deal' seems to want to do it by not doing anything to take the UK out of the EU, or ending the exit process, I don't really see how that helps either.", "236" ], [ "> It's a means to brute force Brexit of which parliament has countlessly voted against.\n\nEverything has been voted against, that is the problem. We avoid no-deal by agreeing a deal or revoking (as unlikely as that is). Anything else is just prolonging the uncertainty and pushing the decision off.\n\nAt the moment the situation is that we have a piece of legislation that takes us out of the EU at the end of the A50 process and an impasse in Parliament about how we leave, unless Parliament actually makes a decision, the legislation (that Parliament put in place..) would still seem to be outcome of the democratic process.\n\n > If you weren't aware, there was an election in 2017 in which MPs were elected to represent and act within the interests of their constituents. These remain constituencies have a fundamental, binding right to be represented. If no deal cannot summon a majority in light of this then they do not have a mandate for no deal brexit.\n\nThere is no mandate for any particular exit from the EU in Parliament, nor consent (or a mandate) to remain in the EU. There is legislation in place that takes us out of the EU though. Simply delaying the exit and hoping that the EU will continue to support that is no more valid than anything else.", "564" ], [ "> The solution is to hold another general election in attempt to gain consent for a pathway forward.\n\nThat's not really a solution. It's a chance to shake up the commons, but it doesn't seem likely that it'll actually shift anything significantly one way or another, as public opinion on leaving the EU doesn't seem to have shifted significantly. We'd almost certainly still end up with a Parliament that can't build a majority around any specific course of action (bar possibly endless extensions), and frankly just time wise it seems a bit pointless right now.\n\n > Forcing a no deal Brexit against parliamentary will just because there is a means to leave is nothing sort of tyrannical and an absolute disgrace to our democracy.\n\nParliament doesn't want to do anything as such, but it did pass legislation that takes the UK out of the EU. If Parliament wants to prevent a no-deal, and it had a majority to do so it could push through a vote of no confidence, but what it can't do is say it doesn't want no deal, retain the legislation that takes us out whether there is a deal or not and not agree on a deal..\n\n > Even if this was to happen, the next step in terms of policy would be to then create a trading arrangement with the EU. In trying to do so, we would find ourselves in the same situation we are in now. Complete deadlock, with the only exception that some MPs may be willing to fold on certain issues to minimise the suffering of their constituents.\n\nThe difference would be that we would no-longer be in the EU and while an FTA with the EU is desirable, it isn't necessary for the UK to move forward outside of the EU. While we are in the EU we can't move forward on anything at all, with non-EU countries (or indeed with the EU..).\n\nAnd just to be clear, once we are outside of the A50 process, the EU doesn't have the competencies to bring in something like the WA, it'd need to be renegotiated from both sides as (likely) a set of agreements. The starting point would also be different (as the UK would be outside of the EU, rather than transitioning out..) things like a transition period would be problematic (again, as we are out..) and so on.\n\nWe either get a deal now (and that'd be the right approach) or we end up in a rather different position, albeit without the constant deadlines and ability for Parliament to ignore the issues and press for extensions.\n\n > It is utterly despotic and should not be an option open for consideration. A general election should be called.\n\nThe current situation is untenable, we can't just continually extent the exit process and maintain uncertainty while Parliament tries to be all things to all people while not making a decision.", "564" ], [ "> <PERSON> has said we will leave on October 31st. He won't become prime minister until the end of this month. There is no time to renegotiate and agree everything. So I would say his current stance is no deal.\n\nTo be fair, there is a WA that is largely uncontroversial. If he wanted to start from scratch then sure, but beyond that? The real issue in the context of renegotiation is that the EU has said it won't reopen the agreement at all, arguably that makes no-deal more likely as long as Parliament is dead set against the WA.\n\n > He also has the support of all the no deal fans from the ERG, he must have promised them something.\n\nYou realise that there are far more Tories who are not ERG than are though right?", "236" ], [ "> Outside of the A50 process we would need another GE to proceed with a mandate anyway.\n\nWhy? It'd just be foreign policy at that point, unless we are seeking an association agreement or joining the EU in some way it wouldn't have anything like the same impact. It's not like we need GE's or referendums to approve things like trade agreements.\n\n > We would be operating under different leadership, under an entirely different set of circumstances and pursuing completely different policies as promised in 2017. Why not just call a GE now?\n\nI think we should call a GE now, or rather, <PERSON> should have gone some time ago, the Tory leadership contest should have been done and we should have held a GE to ratify that change some time ago. The issue that we are running into now is that a GE isn't likely to change much and that it eats the remaining time we have before we leave the EU.\n\n > We shouldn't force an untenable parliament to act against the interests that they were elected on.\n\nWe aren't forcing Parliament to act it can only decide to do that itself, and given the split in public opinion coupled with FPTP and so on I can't see another Parliament at this point being that keen to act either. So that leaves the legislation that is already in place.\n\n > There is also nothing stopping on from moving forward on policy within our current status except for our own parliament. The EU isn't uncooperative in trying to reach a deal and we are slowly securing trading arrangements with countries outside of the EU, a recent example being South Korea..\n\nThe problem is that all of this is broadly based on the split in public opinion, you can't really separate Parliament from that, the issue isn't really a lack of a GE its a lack of consensus in Parliament and among the electorate. \n\nAs to the UK 'slowly securing trading arrangements with countries outside of the EU' it isn't, it is securing commitments to secure trade arrangements once the UK is out. The UK doesn't currently have the competencies to enter into, let alone conclude trade agreements.", "631" ], [ "> we haven't left yet, the assessments of various scenarios are very different to the nonsense <PERSON> put out.\n\nRight, but we did join, so you can look at things like GDP growth, employment, interest rates, inflation and so on over the period before and during our EU membership. It's rather difficult to look at the period 1960-1985 and conclude the UK was better off post 1975.. \n\n > I would say the improvement did. the industries that were dying were doing so anyway. certainly areas like here on cornwall couldn't get much worse and slowly got better. EU investment was a massive boost and no Westminster will not replace it.\n\nThe industries that died were deliberately run down, it was government policy, in part informed by an economic shift driven by EU membership (government policy, but aimed at the EU). The push down to the south is the same. As to EU investment, it is a fraction of UK investment, and that was far too little, so while it is obviously welcome, it falls so far short of national, local and indeed private investment that it is hard to claim it was a 'massive boost'. Indeed EU development funding tends to be a (comparably..) poor way of driving development, at least in the UK.\n\n > Another analysis tells another story [_URL_0_](_URL_0_)\n\nThat analysis is interesting in that it seems to need to compare things that aren't really useful comparisons. Growth in empire up to 1914? Why ignore the period post war? This statement for example:\n\n*\"An important bonus is that the benefits of growth in Britain have been divided much more fairly than in the US.\"* compares the UK to the US, but fails to recognise that inequality jumped massively post 1975...\n\nThe period from 1950 to 1969 is one of the more major booms in UK economics, living standards improved, wages grew, unemployment was low, it gets referred to as a 'golden age'. I'm not close to being old enough to have experienced it, but again, looking at the economic data it's hard to see the first decade and a half of EU membership as anything but a serious negative across everything that actually means anything to people, from wages, interest rates and inflation to employment and job security.\n\nThere is an argument that this was tempered by EU membership, and that our membership of the EU produced better outcomes than staying outside of it would have, but they rely on assumptions about 'what might have been'. What do you think drove the view that the EU wasn't good for the UK? The high point of UK support for EU membership was 1976..\n\nSo again, leaving the EU is likely to have a much, much smaller impact on the UK than what we saw after joining the EU. In that context, rejoining or pining for EU membership seems unlikely.", "841" ], [ "It's the lack of public interest that really is the issue here, this doesn't expose government, it doesn't show the ambassador or FCO doing something wrong, it doesn't even really surprise anyone. All it has done is put the Ambassador in a dubious position and embarrass the UK, while arguably threatening the ability of ambassadors and others to give candid impressions and advice, if it was done for the benefit of the leaker, or to further the political agenda of the leaker then frankly the risk rests with them.", "452" ], [ "> but again you're not providing anything here that shows we weren't the sick man,\n\nWhat I'm pointing out is that we had 2 poor years prior to joining the EU (73-75) but that the period before that was pretty damn good for the UK in social and economic terms. We joined the EU and the UK went through a fairly major, long term set of issues that were uniquely felt by people (it wasn't just a lack of growth, it was massive unemployment, inflation, high interest rates and a massive increase in inefficiency..). \n\n > or it didn't help. it did hugely or this isn't set to harm us massively, it is.\n\nNor are you, you linked a letter, I'm suggesting you look at the actual data from the period. The analysis around it is all about whether the long term benefits were worth it and how you attribute growth or benefit to EU membership. It's a bit of a bastard because the UK didn't do particularly well in the EU compared to countries outside of it and there is no decent baseline anyway..\n\n > The data is there,\n\nIt is, but you seem to be ignoring it and buying into the 'The UK was the sick man of Europe before it joined the EU' thing, it's a nice narriative but it's actually not a great one in context. Things didn't massively improve when the UK joined the EU, and while there is a consensus that EU membership likely contributed to UK growth it is incredibly hard to show that it wouldn't have performed better outside of the EU (although in that instance it is largely down to government policy..).\n\n > the analysis are here.\n\nIndeed.\n\n > I guess you have a view and a hope based on that view, I have one and a fear based on it. again we shall soon see.\n\nWe will, but it is important that we understand the underlying data, and have a decent idea of what we actually want to see. I'll take slower growth in exchange for greater equality in an economic sense, I'd prefer lower interest rates and reasonable inflation, I don't want to see significant unemployment and stagnant wages in exchange for higher top end growth or single market access for example. \n\nI also think it's worth being more concerned about where we are in a decade than where we are in a year. Obviously your mileage will vary.", "841" ], [ "> the recession followed our decline, entry started our recovery.\n\nThat doesn't match the economic data at all though does it? You can't point to the period post the 73 recession as a recovery, or rather, if you do, it was the epitome of a recovery for 'the few', unemployment jumped, wages slumped, interest rates spiked, inflation spiked, and hardly short term...\n\n > I don't think we're going to agree on this though.\n\nIndeed, and that's fine, but obviously we can't disagree on the data. I get it if you think that joining the EU led to a better position in the early 90's than otherwise, but you can't really look at the period from joining to that point as anything other than pretty dire.\n\n > I do however understand the \"we never voted for closer union\" and respect that and revert to a pure trading relationship.\n\nOh absolutely, there are lots of good reasons to leave, my initial point was more that the economic impact of leaving is almost certainly not going to be perceived as drastic or damaging as some are suggesting.", "841" ], [ "A reasonably vanilla multi-lane roundabout with a few exits, would mean reduced visibility of the route ahead, lots of variables based on traffic on the roundabout especially indication and road position, I'd assume that'd be at least as complex as an intersection with complex lights, or a shopping mall parking lot, and obviously you'd be managing several of them on any moderate journey (bar possibly in rural areas).\n\nOne thing I bet it would be good at though would be narrow, fast roads. Having almost immediate notification and slowing/stopping ability must be handy.\n\n*Edit: Just an additional thought, the road markings for roundabouts tend to be pretty messy and non-existent around exits too, and sometimes counter intuitive (my lane departure monitoring thing gets pretty sad most of the time..) so that might complicate it too.*", "523" ], [ "> But in general roundabouts narrow variables. Cars are coming from a single direction and at roughly similar controlled speeds. Cars can yield or enter. That's all in benefit to ai systems designed for it\n\nThey do come from a single direction (so that's easier than a junction with cars crossing across you, a huge benefit of having them in the first place) when you are joining, but movement is more unpredictable unless you know where a car entered (and you often can't see that) and obviously route finding through a roundabout is variable and depends far more on other traffic.\n\nI would argue that I've had more near misses on roundabouts (at lower speeds, and with far more time to react..) anywhere else, because someone going straight on from the third lane that is marked as a left exit, or (worse) continuing around the roundabout from the left lane with no indication is fairly common. It also seems like people are more likely to make radical lane adjustments so that they don't have to go around, as well as 'forcing' you into an incorrect position, which can be pretty screwy.", "523" ], [ "> You are blaming remainers for the wrong kind of Brexit? That is some kind of mental gymnastics. \n\nNo, I'm suggesting that the polarisation meant that the moderates on both sides were swamped by the hard liners, and now positions have hardened. The push for a no-deal is relatively recent and a direct reaction to the inability to pass any kind of other exit, and as an opposition to the continued push for any sort of remain, rather than compromise from much of the remain side.\n\n > Soft Brexit was never on the table, not under <PERSON>, not under <PERSON>, and not even under <PERSON>.\n\nPossibly, but frankly even a hard brexit is preferable to a no-deal brexit, and if there had been more engagement, the extremes could have been hard brexit vs remain, with a central point around a soft brexit, rather than the extremes being no-deal vs remain, and the centre point being unobtainable..\n\n", "564" ], [ "> It's one or the other.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nIt is, and that's sort of the point. Most people in the UK don't really like the EU very much in terms of the political project that it is, its aims and so on. The Euro is unpopular, Schengen is unpopular, integration is unpopular... Essentially all the important unifying elements that are the EU are things that the vast majority of people in the UK don't like. What people in the UK do like is the single market and visa free travel.\n\nSo where do you go from there, we have a referendum that points to leaving the EU, public opinion on that seems relatively fixed (and if we are honest, has been like that for a long time..), the EU needs to integrate to solve some of the issues it has, and to meet its own potential, and we don't like that. I don't see how we can remain in that context. \n\n > Most people don't take an active stance in any politics. \n\nNo, but they did take part in a referendum, and of those that do take an active stance, it seems that being pro-EU isn't a massive portion either.\n\n > Plus, one doesn't have to support the EU project to desire the benefits of membership. Gatekeeping Remain voters who don't actively support the project is ironically like gatekeeping Brexiteers who accept compromise.\n\nNot really, and we should be seeking and accepting a compromise. Practically though, if we don't have at least majority support for the EU, membership is impossible, but we should absolutely be looking for a close relationship with the EU, in a framework that can shift. What I think is absurd is conflating remain support with support for the EU as a project, that support is important it is what would make it viable for the UK to actually take part, without it we will always be on the edge of leaving.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n", "564" ], [ "> It really depends on how you define \"actively wanting to be in\".\n\nI'd define it as having a positive view of the EU as a political and economic project, and wanting the UK to be a part of that project. So beyond the 'if we leave bad things will happen' or the 'we can remain in and veto any change' type positions. Even the 'remain in and reform' sort of falls apart on that as the reform is inevitably (in most cases...) directly the opposite of what the EU is doing.\n\n > In response to my comment about taking an active role in politics, you replied \"No, but they did take part in the referendum\".\n\nMost people don't take an active part in politics, but most still have a view (there are various drivers, for that, some think the bar to taking part meaningfully is high, when really it is ludicrously low, there is apathy and there is antipathy..).\n\n > Now, if that's an adequate threshold for taking an active stance, then a consistent ~48% of the electorate takes an active stance on staying in the EU.\n\nNo it means that about 72% participated in the process. 48% of the electorate voted to keep the UK a member of the EU, but that's not quite the same thing as supporting the EU. It's much like the notion that 52% of the electorate hate the EU, or want the EU to disband, or collapse etc.. It doesn't map.\n\n > One could easily argue the counterpoint that most Brexit supporters take no active stance on what sort of country they want to live in post-Brexit.\n\nNot really, it would seem that most brexit supporters do but that there is variation across the group. But then that's presumably true on the remain side too.\n\n > It's unfair to prescribe one set of standards to one camp and one to the other. \n\nIt is, and I wouldn't..\n\n > Plus, as antagonists to the status quo, the intellectual and moral responsibility for actively shaping the future is on the Brexit-voting public, not Remainers.\n\nThe responsibility for shaping the future lies with all of us, it is up to us how much we participate and what we contribute, but ideally we'd aim to work together, because if we don't we end up with outcomes we don't really like (like a no-deal exit from the EU when something milder should be entirely possible).", "564" ], [ "> People (remainers) generally do take a positive view of the EU. Recognising and admitting its flaws does not infer a negative view of the EU.\n\nOpposition to integration, to the direction of the project, the political elements of the project, often to FoM and so on are negative. Remainers tend to come to the conclusion that the negatives are worth it, and statistically (from the polling at least) that seems to come down to the economic risks of leaving, rather than support for the EU.\n\n > I'm not sure why you feel that actively supporting the EU is a requirement for validly wanting to remain in it.\n\nIt's not a requirement, it's a problem if it isn't the case, because it means support is incredibly soft. If you compare 'support' for the EU in the UK to support for the EU in Germany, it's a world of difference, and it means that rather than tollerating EU membership and effectively opposing 'everything' the EU does, you end up with a better balance and long term commitment. \n\nWithout that the UK will always have one foot out, and that is simply not sustainable for the UK or the EU. It either isolates the UK within the EU (And so we end up wither holding up EU integration, or being overridden, or we end up with divergence..). \n\n > This isn't born out by evidence. Brexiteers have been woefully unsuccessful in organising an in-person rally at any point in the last three years.\n\nWe are leaving the EU, I'm not sure there is any need to organise a rally to support what is government and opposition policy tbh..\n\n > I totally agree. The thing about Remain vs Leave is that we have compromise already.\n\nWhat compromise? There was a fairly unanimous rejection of the WA and both sides pushing harder to their extremes. There doesn't seem to be much of a compromise there.\n\n > Brexit is an inherently uncompromising move,\n\nIt's binary, we can't be in and out, any compromise is essentially about how close to the EU we remain outside of it. But there is a lot of scope ithere.\n\n > but attempting to capitulate in any way to the EU (i.e. compromising) is seen as a betrayal of Brexit now. \n\nBy a minority of people (essentially the very hard/no-deal lot)..\n\n > Vying for a no-deal outcome is tantamount to admitting that you aren't responsible for shaping the future, because doing so disregards attempts to negotiate with the EU.\n\nPushing no-deal because the view is that no deal is achievable given the lack of support on both the leave hard fringe, and the remain side. However it also creates realisation that while it'd be better to transition away from the EU gradually and to a relatively close relationship, if the only way to leave is no-deal, then leaving and rebuilding is a less idea, but still valid alternative.", "564" ], [ "> That's a pretty high threshold for support. \n\nI'm not sure that agreeing with the aims and direction of a political union is a particularly high bar for support..\n\n > I'm repeating myself here, but it's like suggesting Brexiteers don't support Brexit because they accept they'll lose some of the benefits of remaining. \n\nAgain, I'm differentiating between support for remain and support for the EU. I support the EU, but I'm very much a leave voter. That isn't contradictory, you can be a remainer and not like the EU. \n\n > Poll after poll has found that Leave voters recognise and accept negatives of leaving, so why are you gatekeeping remain support on that basis?\n\nI'm not.\n\n > The recent elections were a proxy vote for Brexit in which a party called \"The Brexit Party\" campaigned on the basis of the betrayal of the vote and against govt and opposition policy, and won the largest vote share, yet failed to produce a physical presence in the streets, despite its many attempts.\n\nWhy are rallies relevant in context though? And you are right that some in the BXP (and broader leave) grouping seem to think that there will be a 'betrayal' but if seems like very much a minority view.. \n\n > I was referring to the practical matters of EU membership, being free trade, regulatory alignment, \n\nBut not the political project?\n\n > But since you're on the topic, the WA was an example of compromise that was bilaterally rejected, further proving that Brexit is the antithesis of a compromising political movement.\n\nSurely it shows that leaving the EU has the country and public opinion split and that there was no willingness to compromise. It was rejected by the hard remain/hard leave supporters after all.\n\n > and the MPs that support Brexit yet rejected the WA and alternatives.\n\nAnd by MP's that support remaining..\n\n > Remain and reform, the WA, Norway, and other established alternatives (that contained an element of compromise) were all valid, achievable, and rejected. No-deal is hardly a valid alternative.\n\nNo deal is a viable alternative in that it removes the UK from the EU. It is far from ideal, but it is certainly viable.\n\n > It only serves to excuse its supporters of responsibility for championing an outcome with a clear direction and vindicating their supporters against immigration.\n\nNo.. It takes the UK out of the EU.", "564" ], [ "> Almost All farming receives subsidies. And if it's not profitable without. Then the British government has a job to do replacing them with domestic subsidies.\n\nRight, but CAP isn't the only approach and having subsidy levels subject to domestic political pressure is arguably more accountable and could be far more effective. It's certainly easier to make wholesale changes than it is to reform CAP.\n\n > And if they don't than don't vote tory.\n\nAbsolutely.", "365" ], [ "> It's also costly especially since they will have a lot more expenses going forward and less income.\n\nWhy would we have more expenses and less income? \n\n > Farmers going bust is a sacrifice they are willing to make\n\nGovernments of all stripes have both supported businesses that couldn't operate independently and allowed them to fail, usually it depends on the government. Farmers are partially right though, governments can't let them fail if that creates problems for voters, and the cost of subsidies is relatively small (compared to most other government spending at least).", "786" ], [ "> uk builds ~200k houses a year and population increases around 300k a year. Unless i'm wrong in assuming that babies don't have their own houses, and you on average have more than 2 people living in any house, the supply is enough.\n\nSince 2008 the UK has built on average 158k houses a year, only in one year did it build 200k (2018, 205k dwellings. That's a total of a little less than 1.9 million houses. Over largely the same period (a year less...), the population grew by around 4.97 million (from 62.26m to 66.80). And that ignores the demographic banding too. Oh and between 1997 and 2007 alone the number of people living alone increased by 16%, to 7.7m people. \n\nAnd yes, on average you have more than 2 people living in any house, i think it's about 2.3 people if you average it, although it's a tad more complicated when looking at housing, but either way. The level of house building however doesn't support that, and never mind that we are also seeing demographic change (an aging population) and that a reasonable portion of the UK's population increases have not been driven by new births, but by immigration of adults (who do need somewhere to live).\n \nBut we have lots of data, so lets take a look at the period from 1989 to 1996 (inclusive), because over that period we saw a fall of house prices in real terms, the building rate was higher (185k/y) with 1.48m houses built, while we saw population growth of only 1.8m.... Hmm.\n\n > Even though disagree about your thoughts on supply, we both agree that the hypothetical supply shortage is artificial, correct?\n\nThe supply shortage isn't artificial in the sense that it is a real shortage, the issue is that builders are currently almost incentivised not to build to maintain prices.\n\n > More like 37%, and most people do buy houses as a \"safe\" investment.\n\nNo, more like 37%, and most people absolutely buy houses to live in, not with the intention of selling at some point later at a profit (and profiting from a sale is generally not required for people to be better off buying at the moment).", "302" ], [ "I'm not sure it is where it belongs (the UK will be a better partner to the EU outside the union than it was a member) but that aside, any attempt to rejoin will take decades, not least because things would need to shift significantly within the UK, there would need to be much greater support for membership than we've seen for a long time, and obviously all the political parties are feeling a bit burned either way. Throw in that the UK is moving away from the EU on trade and will incur a cost to do so, and would incur another cost to move back eventually and indeed that the EU will have changed in that time and it becomes less likely still. And then you have the issue on the other side, would the EU really want to see a UK that had previously left come back and potentially bin it again at some point?\n\nIt's possible of course, given time, but it's not something that is likely in the next couple of decades and even then EU integration may well mean that it is even less attractive.", "631" ], [ "So the parents said:\n\n > The EU demands nothing.\n\nWhich is clearly false (both sides are asking for things, both sides have things that they are happy to offer, and some that they are not, hence the negotiation.\n\nI said that they did, pointing out that it is not one sided.\n\nBut how did you get from that to:\n\n > Oh my god, how dare a separate trading entity make any demands while representing their members... don't they know who we are?!\n\nDid someone somewhere suggest that neither side could ask (or demand...) something? I clearly missed that comment...", "437" ], [ "They aren't worthless arguments, they are arguably the whole point. If the government has the power to act, it can be held accountable for how it acts and when it doesn't. They can't hide behind the EU. And obviously it's not just this current government, but all future ones..\n\nSuggesting that the competencies that sat with the EU should sit with the UK is entirely valid and valuable, it is absolutely not fallacious at all..", "437" ], [ "> They're worthless because they rest upon a hypothetical which is very unlikely to happen and bears little relation to the realpolitik of this country.\n\nNo.. They aren't based on a hypothetical. The competencies do return to the UK. It is down to UK governments to make use of those powers going forward and they are accountable to people in the UK.\n\nThey might not do what you'd prefer, or what I'd prefer, and maybe you'd like them to remain with the EU because you like way the EU operates or it's aims etc.. But there is no hypothetical in terms of where powers rest.\n\n > Governmental accountability hasn't been a thing in the UK for years. Scandals no longer lead to ministerial resignations and our electoral system is incapable of representing the actual will of the people.\n\nLets assume for a moment that that is true, that doesn't change the issues around where powers sit and the EU is essentially only accountable to the UK via the UK government (given where the power sits in the EU's institutions..). \n\n > It's beyond naive and into the realms of deliberate misrepresentation to suggest that the EU won't be the Tories' scapegoat for the ongoing future.\n\nThe Tories can try to scapegoat whoever they want, they are however responsible for governing and that includes the powers that they now have that were delegated to the EU.\n\n > Suggesting these competencies will lead to the ideal outcome (and \"we would have done it faster\" is a particularly incredible stretch) for every given argument is disingenuous to say the least and especially so given our current kakistocracy.\n\nI'm not suggesting that there will be an ideal outcome in terms of the use of the competencies, I'm pretty sure people would disagree about what 'ideal' is. I am suggesting that the return of those powers in and of itself is a large part of the outcome that people were looking for, and that every time we have an election, we'll be talking about how those powers are used, and all our political parties will be able to make the case about how they will use them.\n\nBrexit was a long term decision, looking at it through the lense of the current government is pretty absurd in that context. It's not about this government, or even just the next, it's about every government from here on forward.", "631" ], [ "> Not this bollocks again. \"EUSSR\" is a much easier shorthand.\n\nIt's much easier shorthand for something completely different....? The EU has a built in tension between member states and the democratic elements that have been added on afterwards. Most of the power still rests with the member states (hence member states still being sovereign as part of the EU). It's the government that can agree to pass off more power (without going to the electorate to confirm it, and with it being hard to reverse) and the member states exercise most control over those powers.\n\nI'm reasonably sure the USSR didn't function on that basis, but.. You whatever you want..\n\n > Again, our electoral system is incapable of representing the will of the people and so this accountability you're suggesting is a factor simply doesn't exist.\n\nOur electoral system is entirely capable of producing Parliaments that are representative of the country, that accountability absolutely does exist. You could argue that the EU referendum (and subsequent votes..) are a pretty big indication of that, it forced a change in government policy and representatives followed through on it..", "437" ], [ "> What were the 3 words after \"aberration\"?\n\nIn our system? They aren't though, they get used very sparingly when it comes to issues that directly impact governance and where there are issues in Parliament dealing with the question (that's true for the Indyref, the NI referendum, the EC referendum, the EU referendum, AV and the various devolution related ones..). They are however very much direct.\n\n > The GE didn't confirm anything.\n\nIt returned a government that said it would take the UK out of the EU, the next largest party said it would offer a second referendum...\n\n > Aside from elections being multifaceted and thus impossible to use as a bellweather for a single issue, the only two viable parties of government both offered pro-Brexit platforms - there simply wasn't the option to vote for an anti-Brexit party given the realities of FPTP.\n\nRight, but there had been a referendum that was binary previously and two years in which parties made decisions on their position.. Arguably your point about the two major parties being pro-leave emphasises why from time to time referendums on issues like this are required, after all, in the decades before the referendum, all the major parties only offered pro-EU membership positions. There was absolutely no scope for anyone to vote for anti-brexit party given the realities of FPTP..\n\nYet that doesn't make the UK government unaccountable or Parliament not representative of the country as a whole, it's imperfect (every system is), and again, compared to the EU it is far, far more accountable to the electorate. In that context, the powers returned to the UK are far closer to domestic control and far more subject to the accountability than they were when the UK was in the EU.", "564" ], [ "> But because on the whole the regulations imposed by the EU upon the UK have been positive, its accountability hasn't really been tested.\n\nThat's arguable, EU regulation has been broadly in line with regulation that you'd expect from well regulated democracies, there have been some failures, some near misses, a lot of very ambitious, but broadly decent regulation, and one or two actual strides forward. But there has been fairly little input and often public action is seen as a negative (or outright eurosceptic) and that's problematic.\n\n > However, should the EU suddenly turn around and do something monstrous, the electoral system for MEPs is much more likely to produce a swift rebuke than the UK voting system, which has for decades now let governments get away with widespread corruption and cronyism.\n\nProbably not, if only because the role of MEP's is not the same as the role of MP's and the relative strength of the EP vs the other EU institutions doesn't come close to the power that Parliament has... The EP's ability to hold the EU as a whole to account is fairly restrained (again, by design, because of the split in responsibilities between the states and the EU).", "437" ], [ "> The problem with the referendum wasn't a lack of representativeness, it was a lack of specificity and accountability.\n\nThat'd I'd agree with. When it comes to questions of governance, the yes/no question is supposed to lead into a 'how', that is what Parliament is supposed to be good at after all. Given the referendum was close, but went leave it created a problem around legitimacy, but it did not set a course for a hard brexit. That was something that Parliament and the government should have built on, and that should have come out of wider political debate.\n\nInstead we spent a couple of years shouting at each other about leaving or remaining, rather than what leaving could or should look like. That in turn led to increased polarisation. I mean initially there was a lot of discussion among the leave side about what an exit should look like, but it ran into a whole slew of issues (for one it broke the leave group into several groups with different aims for brexit, but all still wanting to see the UK out of the EU, that was somewhat hammered by the notion of multi-option referendums (soft/hard/remain etc..) and it was impossible to build a consensus around anything much beyond 'leave'.\n\n > It wasn't designed to build a mandate for Brexit, after all, but to kill it, and so there were no government proposals, with the idea of what Leave meant being wide open for campaigners to come up without any responsibility for delivering. \n\nIndeed, and that is very much on <PERSON>. He wanted the uncertainty of brexit as a lever (and it almost worked..). Obviously no-one could have offered a guaranteed outcome (the EU would have to agree), but it would have been possible to lay out some options and then balance the costs/benefits of each.\n\nUnfortunately I think <PERSON> felt that that would make a leave result more likely (and I think he'd have been right..), so instead went the other way, preventing the civil service from even considering an leave outcome etc..\n\n > And so it came to be wielded as a weapon to be used by those claiming that their personal interpretation of the result is \"the will of the people\" and to disagree with them is undemocratic, even to the extent of trying to bind future Parliaments and individual MPs.\n\nYeah I agree there too. It was a binary issue, a question of consent, but the ERG or Tories claiming that their view of brexit had majority support was false. Labour also screwed up, they arguably had the most credible leader in terms of leave support, but neither used him to set out a vision for the UK outside of the EU, nor really managed to articulate anything else other than opposition to a 'Tory Brexit'\n\n > Something like Brexit has to be the project of a government that's elected on a manifesto to deliver it, and that is what we now have. They have every right to do so, and I certainly hope that they are held accountable if it isn't everything that was promised.\n\nI'd agree with that too, although we wandered from 2017 through to 2019 with first an objection from the opposition to a GE on the basis that the Tories might win, through to the mess that was 2019.", "564" ], [ "> The article would seem to underline that national governments can decide policy, as shown by the ECJ ruling.\n\nIt does, but it's from October this year, up until then it was less clear (the whole point being that an authorisation for use across the market was valid across the market, with national regulation on how it could be used to some extent). In short, it's not quite as simple as this being a UK competency (it is a shared one...).\n\n > As you say a legal challenge can be placed. But in the UK it would almost certainly fail. The courts very rarely decide in favour of judicial review cases.\n\nAs I understand it, it can be challenged at the EU level on the basis that the assessment of its safety doesn't stand up. The benefit that France (and others) had on neonicotinoids was that the EU was already shifting in that direction, so it was less contentious.", "631" ], [ "In which case you are probably missing most of the arguments.. \n\nNo doubt some of it is about 'difference' but it's also about similarity. Independence movements are generally about self governance and having laws that reflect the people that live wherever it is. That can be negative (say someone wanting a theocratic regime...) but also positive. And yes, it is about identity, people who don't see themselves as Spanish say, but do see them selves as Catalan and so want more say in their own affairs than they have as part of Spain.\n\nAnd as an aside, identity works both ways, the objections to independence tend to be pretty similar to those used to support it.\n\nAll in self-determination is pretty important, the legitimacy of government rests on it. Any given independence movement could be positive or negative, but at the end of the day it comes down to the people who feel that they are different or the same and want to see a change..", "68" ], [ "> To me as a British citizen, I personally feel that the UK certainly does belong in the EU, and I will continue to state that until the UK has re-joined, or I've regained EU citizenship another way. \n\nSure and that's your right and frankly also healthy in a democracy..\n\n > Also, the significant shift that you mentioned has already started happening in a major way now that people are seeing the truth about Brexit, with a majority of people polled now saying that Brexit was wrong[1]. \n\nNot really, there isn't more support for the EU, or the EU as a project and a political union. There is marginally more opposition to leaving, largely caused by the uncertainty of the UK's exit. Whether that grows, falls away or simply stagnates remains to be seen. I'd also argue that while the UK can and has made changes on the basis of fairly small scale differences (essentially a simple majority), I don't know if the EU would want a member where even 40% of the population opposed membership (and that'd suggest support well above where it is now for an EU membership that won't exist in the future..). \n\n > Whilst I agree with the idea that it will more than likely take a long time for the UK to re-join the EU, I think that, at the very least, the hard Brexit this incompetent government is pushing for will not stand the test of time.\n\nIt may well not, but things will also change over time, this government won't be around for ever and the UK will deal with the challenges that the exit creates for it. It's not going to be some permanent disaster, the UK and EU will move on.\n\n > Also, I'm curious to know where you get the idea that the UK is moving away from the EU on trade, as, our biggest trading partner is the EU [2], and I don't see what other major nations are going to fill the massive void that reducing trade with the EU would cause. Even with a hard Brexit, the UK will not be able to just simply move away from trading with the EU if it wants to remain a significant economy as so much of our trade is with the EU, and that is simply not going to change.\n\nMost of the UK's trade doesn't come from the EU, and the UK is looking to build on that. The noises around joining CPTPP, looking at multinational services frameworks, tighter ties with Canada, the US, India and Africa all move the UK away from the EU and while the UK and EU will always see a lot of bilateral trade, those international relationships will be important as the UK moves forward.\n\n > Its clear that most other significant economies around the world, such as the US, will rightly prioritise trade with the EU over the UK , and trade deals with small nations like Côte d'Ivoire are certainly not going to fill the void.\n\nThey'll prioritise market access. The EU is not an easy body to strike a deal with (see the issues around CETA) and the UK has a relatively open economy and seems to want to work internationally. In that context it is not a competition between whether someone trades with the UK or EU, it'll be about the terms of trade with either.\n\n > From the EUs point of view, I personally feel a lot of sympathy for the notion that the British should be punished for Brexit. I think that the EU has every right to reject the UK in the future over fears of a second Brexit, and I also think the EU is indeed better off without the UK in many ways. But despite this, I hope that the UK can and will change eventually and become an outward looking sensible nation again, that has no intentions of putting sanctions on itself. The UK needs the EU more than the EU needs the UK, but the fools in the UK government don't seem to realise that.\n\nThe UK is an outward looking sensible nation, the EU has benefited from that for a long time. Arguably the EU's regional outlook and inability to actually make use of its size is one of the things that has pushed the UK in the direction it has gone. The UK is and will continue to be progressive, quite possibly more than the EU given the challenges the EU faces.", "631" ], [ "> It hadn't been challenged in court, which is a very different thing. The rules already allowed for national policy. This case would appear to be the industry having a last-ditch attempt to have the rules declared illegal.\n\nNot really, the point of the single market is that goods allowed in one country are allowed in all (which is why the UK can ban the production of foie gras, but not the import..), with active products it hinges on regulatory approval and guidance for use. The latter being a member state competency. And it gets messier still where various EU competencies intersect. So IIRC France banned the use, but not sale of neonicotinoids, and I think I'm right in saying it hasn't banned production. And then there is risk, EU regulations on phytosanitary products allows for exceptions where there is no alternative method to deal with a pest (something that France is facing in relation to Sugar Beet), regardless of a national ban.\n\nIt's not simple, but again, you are absolutely right that the UK could take action on it as an EU member. The competencies that are relevant, are shared.\n\n > I could perhaps imagine an argument that goes \"the EU says it is safe, so it should be allowed\". But given a rule that allows countries to implement their own restrictions that has been upheld to be legal, I can't see that argument getting very far. \n\n > The ECJ can only rule on EU law, so the matter would be passed back to the UK courts to rule on whether parliament is being fair when restricting such sales. My understanding is that the supreme court generally will deem that Parliament can make whatever law it wants, so long as it is equitable and not unnecessarily discriminatory.\n\nHypothetically the ECJ would be ruling on EU law because it'd relate to market access if the UK banned the import or sale of something (even a pesticide) and it could be challenged if there were an issue with the justification for a ban. It is a barrier to the market. Indeed IIRC it was an issue with the leaded petrol phase out way back when, and there have been arguments around the ban on new ICE cars too (it's easier when a national ban intersects with EU policy though..).", "631" ], [ "It's a negotiation between partners that both want access to the other, in absolute terms the EU has a little more on the table than the UK too. There is a disparity (in that larger countries have more to offer..), but trade agreements are mutually beneficial and the proportional gain tends to benefit the smaller economy more than the larger one (see any of the EU FTA's with smaller partners). Both sides can also say no...\n\nIt'd be true to say that the EU has more leverage than the UK at the moment, the EU can save the UK quite a bit of money and effort in offering an acceptable agreement (And that is worth something to the UK) although that starts to fall off if the UK exits the transition without a deal.", "631" ], [ "I came across this earlier on a different sub, and ended up watching all of it. The professionalism (not unexpected obviously..) of the Irish Navy shines through and gives a better indication of the issues that they faced in the med. Obviously I've seen and read about the issues that were faced by rescuers/migrants and indeed some of the things the smugglers did, but this does help put that last segment into perspective.\n\nYou also have to feel sorry for the Sailors involved, a lot of what they've had to deal with here will have been harrowing and quite different from what they routinely trained for previously. Anyway, thought I'd share.", "735" ], [ "> This isn't true at the low end of the market. \n\nOf course it is, people are still making choices about what type of property they want to buy, where and so on. Choices are limited by budget, but they are still very much present and very much drive prices.\n\n > Right-to-buy is itself a terrible corruption of the market.\n\nIt was although one that creates a steady supply of below market value property for council tenants.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n", "302" ], [ "> If you can't afford a rental car short term, then you most likely can't afford to be traveling long distances via a car.\n\nThe cost differences between those are pretty significant.. It's usually relatively cheap to travel in your own car, renting tends to be multiple times as expensive per mile (and usually more expensive than other public transport..). I'm pretty sure that in terms of budget alone not being able to rent a car short term wouldn't indicate that you can't afford travelling long distance by car in most countries..", "130" ], [ "> That is far cheaper than traveling long distances in your own car.\n\nThat will likely very much depend on where you live. Where I am in the UK driving is generally cheaper than public transport (certainly so if you have more than one person in the car) and renting the cheapest care you can get hold of for a couple of days would tend toward £15-18/day plus fuel, that's considerably more expensive than owning a car..", "130" ], [ "It is part of china, but China agreed to split approach to governance (one country, two systems) when the UK handed it back. The reason it's an issue for China is that China essentially violated the agreement it had with the UK in a fairly fundamental way and in doing so (plus the news today..) stripped people in HK of the relatively limited control that they had as well as significantly changing HK's viability as an international hub.", "839" ], [ "It does mean that other countries will have more to say about what China does in HK specifically because China is breaching its obligations to others, it is China's territory, but only because China agreed to run it in a certain way for a while.\n\nWhen it comes t other countries, China's interests tend to conflict with others, but that was seen as less of an issue (say with NK..) previously because China was seen as trying to become a 'good' member of the global community. That view has shifted more recently (because of HK among other things).", "753" ], [ "> I think $100k for property damage and corresponding medical coverage should be the minimum. I run $250kI\n\n'm always amazed at these threads looking from a UK perspective, the UK minimum would be an 'RTA policy' which you essentially can't buy (falls below the 'normal' minimum third party cover). Includes an unlimited indemnity for bodily injury or death caused to third parties, including passengers, property damage cover to £1,000,000, plus a slew of other bits. The actual minimum sold includes unlimited indemnity for bodily injury or death, plus £20 million for third party property damage. (see here for [more details](_URL_0_)..). \n\nI suppose the point there would be that while most accidents cause very low cost damages, it spirals quite quickly where they aren't. An accident on the motorway will get expensive very rapidly, hitting anything related to infrastructure (roadside/utilities/barriers etc..), accidents involving goods vehicles or on roads where recovering a crashed vehicle is har all can lead to insanely high costs to repair and mitigate.", "667" ], [ "> It's great that you can do this pretty quick in UK too, but it's just that much faster in Estonia.\n\nI'm not sure it's faster, let alone much faster in Estonia to be honest, although the point I'd make is that Estonia and the UK have been doing really well with this (not sure who else in Europe comes close...). It shouldn't be hard after all. I have had to look at doing it in Belgium (albeit a couple of years ago) and it would have taken weeks at the very least and cost a fairly significant sum too.", "146" ], [ "OP deleted their post, but just going on context from the thread...\n\nDiscussions tend to be fine up to a point, sales and solicitation tends to be where it gets messy (and reddit does act on it, which can create issues for subs if they don't..).\n\nThe issues tend to arise when people solicit one way or another on non subject specific subs, oddly enough it gets reported (but likely wouldn't on say, r.drug..) and if reported as a prohibited transaction that goes to reddit admin staff, who will remove posts & comments (and potentially mod control..).", "126" ], [ "Believe it or not some people aren't very tech savvy, there are a reasonably large amount of pirated music, games and film available to buy online and offline (markets etc..) and people do. It's easy, you get media, someone has pre-cracked it or sorted a key, or for film and video made it easy for you to play it on your stereo/TV etc... It's a convenience/know how thing, and obviously it's usually still vastly cheaper than buying/subscribing to a service.", "793" ], [ "In context it might be more sensible if you did [u/MyCrazyBanana42](_URL_0_)..\n\nI mean come on, why delete your own comments on a topic and then refuse to respond to people when they reply to you? I get the impression that your issue isn't so much the sub, or people replying to you, but he way you are interacting with others.. You were calling the lack of discussion 'pathetic' earlier, and then (again..) binned your own comments..\n\nAnd obviously you can delete your comments if you want, but it starts to look a bit sus when its most of them, and then when you complain about the discussion.", "248" ], [ "> I just don't want negative vibes?\n\nBut presumably if you want to talk about something you know that you aren't only going to get positive responses..\n\n > Again I literally said, who smokes? I can only assume regulars on this Subreddit have an issue with life saving medicine.\n\nI have no idea what they have an issue with, and given the way you interact with people it may be less about that than about your comments.. Although obviously it's hard to tell without looking through deleted comments...\n\n > Downvoting someone for saying who smokes is so pathetic lmao. If you don't then fine.\n\nTo be fair, so is deleting comments because they are being downvoted.\n\n > But I'm a god damn moderator on a subreddit bigger than this one and I am always sure not to be sus\n\nWell done you, although I assume it's on a different account given it isn't showing on yours. And I also mod larger subs and it does look sus if you are deleting most of your comments.. Its what (As you'll know..) moderators look at if they think there is an issue.\n\n > Also I'm not reading that wall of text out of principle.\n\nI'm not sure which principle that would be, you kicked off a discussion and then didn't like the responses and so replied shittily.. It's a bit crap on your part.", "263" ], [ "I make a point to hold the light for my kids after working them through a fix (to avoid the issue being addressed in this post...). It does have some drawbacks and some unexpected benefits. The biggest drawback is that rewiring a socket suddenly takes five times as long, the benefits are when shit does break there is more than person who can deal with it competently and quickly... \n\nOur brake light bulbs both (might have been a brake light and a driving light..) left and right blew while driving through Germany a couple of years ago, replacing them involves removing the light clusters entirely etc.. it's a pain in the arse, not a massive job, but fiddly, it was dark, it was raining etc... Had the kids do the replacement as a race, it was like the weirdest F1 pitstop. I stayed dry, the bulbs got changed. What more could you want.", "1006" ], [ "> I speculate that <PERSON>'s game in this extreme scenario is to progressively change the context under a cloak of confusion, the bullshit-baffles-brains approach.\n\nHow?\n\n > After the election <PERSON> will have that power (in the extreme scenario). That power can be applied to whitewash the dirty trail that led to power.\n\nAgain.. No, apart from the fact that he can't actually do what you are suggesting. He also can't, as PM whitewash anything as he's subject to the courts.\n\n > In the meantime, legal power is not the only currency, he has access to many other sources of power\n\n > <PERSON> has the support of major newspapers (Sun, Telegraph, Express, )\n\n > <PERSON> has support of people with lots of money and people with very sharp brains and very good information.\n\n > <PERSON> has the support of powerful nations (USA, KSA, Israel) who would prefer his party in government to any alternative party.\n\n > <PERSON> has charismatic power with a large proportion of voters.\n\nWhich is great, but doesn't get him past the mild issue that if he breaks the law, he's going to be facing the courts...\n\nSo again, you are laying out lots of individual factors, some that would make it very viable for <PERSON> to take the UK out of the EU after a General Election, but none that would allow him to bypass the law to take the UK out of the EU before the 31st, again, the only viable options there are either that Parliament agrees to no-deal (very unlikely), that Parliament signs off on a deal (somewhat more likely, but not very) or that the EU doesn't offer an extension....\n\nWild speculation about mystical things that <PERSON> might be able to do using the media, Saudi Arabia, the US and charisma is just that, wild speculation that gets you no further..", "236" ], [ "> I only checked the first, <PERSON> was one of the 273 who voted for the customs union which failed by 3 votes. Why are you being disingenuous?\n\nI'm not being disingenuous, you seem to now be conflating actual votes on a deal, with the indicative votes (which even if any of them had led to a majority, wouldn't have had any impact, as there was no legislation to support them at that point).\n\n > Can you reassess your list and give me some Labour MPs who haven't voted for any deal as your previous list appears to be false.\n\nYou are asking a different question here, I assume what you are trying to ask is did any Labour MP's not vote for any of the options in the indicative votes? Is that what you mean? If it is, I'd love to know how its relevant..", "564" ], [ "Pretty much everyone here is aware of it because if you get 6 points in the first few years of driving you lose your license entirely (have to redo your theory and practical test IIRC) and after that period, 12 points in 3 years also leads to a disqualification. Speeding comes with a minimum of 3 points IIRC, other offences like driving without insurance come with hefty fines and 6+ points, and obviously some things like drink driving lead to outright bans..", "462" ], [ "I loved the bit where he suggested I was a shit driver because in a similar scenario I'd probably not move either (granted, the UK has stricter rules on zebra crossing..)... But at night, with a fast moving bike on a pavement, looking like its going to cross, and not stop, how could you fault a driver for stopping? Personally I'd want to avoid hitting the cyclist, or having them hit me, odd approach I know.. My usual issue on a bike is that cars utterly ignore than I'm there..\n\nAnd frankly even that is somewhat excusable if he had stopped and waved him on, or been remotely polite to the driver, but the whole \"What part of my hand indicating you to go on do you not understand\" wound me up. As did the stopping in the middle of the road in front of an oncoming car that he thought was being driven by an erratic drunk, albeit for different reasons.\n\nAnd yeah, it spirals from there. Ah well, what can you do.\n\n*Edit: I hadn't realised it was an e-bike by they by, so he wasn't peddling like a lunatic to catch him then, which was my first thought..*.", "990" ], [ "> A direct quote from you,\n\nYes...\n\n > I'm asking you which LAB MPs don't agree with leaving. You're making this out to be a big deal, when you haven't even provided me one name, whereas there are 30+ known ERG members and many others who are not known.\n\nSorry, you've lost me again. There were three votes on a deal that would have taken the UK out of the EU, the ERG and the Labour MP's I listed (and the SNP, Lib Dems and Greens...) All voted against each time it came up.\n\nIf you are talking about the indicative votes, I'm not sure what the relevance is given that none of them got close to a majority in support.\n\nI'm not saying that Labour MP's wouldn't vote for some exit approach, I'd assume they'd vote for a Labour deal for example, but that doesn't really help very much as we need a majority of MP's to all vote for the same thing for it to pass..", "564" ], [ "> Anyone have any insight into that?\n\nI'm betting there are a few lawyers who are desperately waiting to be able to discuss just that to be honest. It'll be a massive decision when it happens because no-one involved (Driver, Drivers Insurer, Tesla) will want to be responsible for the actions of the car acting autonomously. \n\nI had a bit of a discussion at a tech event (well advanced manufacturing and industrial process control, interesting bunch..) on this a while back and one of the thoughts was that if the current insurance approach remained the same, the car might need insurance that is separate from the driver to cover it when acting autonomously, with a component of that covering the manufacturer.\n\nAt the moment though the view was that it'd be the drivers liability (but that stemmed from the notion that you'd be 'in control' of the vehicle even if you weren't there, when summoning, the idea being that it'd be similar to if you crashed a drone while it was on autopilot, or indeed rear ended someone on cruise control.", "38" ], [ "> How can it possibly apply to Labour MPs in leave areas if they are voting for deals,\n\nOnly 5 Labour MP's voted for the deal on the table.. So a Labour MP who doesn't agree with leaving, or a given deal might not vote for one? It doesn't matter if a Labour (or ERG) MP might vote for a different deal if that deal isn't available..\n\n > whereas the ERG aren't??? \n\nBecause it's not about whether a Labour MP would vote for a deal in principle, it's whether a Labour MP would vote for a specific deal..\n\n > This is a deeply confusing path of logic you've chosen to follow and continue to stick to...\n\nNo.. It's not. If we held a referendum, and it came back with a 'leave with Mays WA' then an ERG MP might well say no, they won't vote for <PERSON>'s deal (and didn't when it came up in the commons) because they think it's a bad deal. A Labour MP might well also say no, they also won't vote for <PERSON>'s deal (and didn't when it came up in the commons) because they also think it's a bad deal. The difference is that the ERG MP would want the UK to leave with no-deal, while the Labour MP might vote to leave with a Labour deal. It however results in neither voting for a deal.\n\nWhich is why you had 34 ERG MP's voting the same way as the bulk of Labour MP's when the votes on the withdrawal agreement were held..\n\nI'm not sure what's confusing here.", "236" ], [ "> Because it's a false equivalency.\n\nHow? The outcome is the same. It doesn't matter if an MP would theoretically vote for a deal, it matters that they aren't voting for a deal that is available.\n\n > They have voted for a deal though??\n\nNo, they voted in the indicative votes that they might vote for a deal if one was presented.\n\nThere were three votes on a deal, Labour voted no to all of them (bar the 5 mentioned above).\n\n > Can you just name a single Labour MP who follows this statement of yours. Where they haven't voted for a single deal.\n\nYes, the 200+ mentioned above... \n\nYou are conflating the possibility of Labour MP's voting for a deal, with actual votes on a deal. And you are using the indicative votes for some reason, when all they indicated was that there was no majority, or anything close to it for any of the options presented..\n\nAgain, for a deal to pass, it needs a majority of MP's to vote specifically for it, not just a majority of MP's who might vote for a deal of some sort..", "845" ], [ "> It is an extreme scenario in which you cannot assume that existing power structures will endure. Treaties can be walked away from. I paint it with a broad brush because it will not be possible to predict the detail.\n\nIt's important to at least outline the approach. Otherwise its broadly nonsense. <PERSON> could invade France theoretically, he could do any number of illegal things, but he can't use the CCA to bypass the Benn Act, he can't take the UK out of the EU without breaking the law if Parliament don't opt for a deal, allow a no-deal or no extension is offered...\n\n > Yes it is unlikely to happen. But to totally ignore the possibility of an illegal coup\n\nThe reason it's reasonable to ignore the possibility of an illegal coup is that it isn't likely. I mean, the Army could take over tomorrow, but I don't think that's very likely either. <PERSON> doesn't have the support he'd need in the country for a coup, never mind in Parliament or government.\n\n > and to keep thinking that laws and courts and constitutions will always keep us all safe is wishful thinking. \n\nRight, but the process we are talking about here, the 'leaving the EU' thing is a legal process, it has to happen in line with our rules and the EU's rules. <PERSON> simply deciding to carry out a coup would kill that dead. He wouldn't have the power to act.. There is no scenario that is even remotely viable that gets you to a coup of any nature.\n\n > Look at what is happening elsewhere in the world where might repeatedly trumps right.\n\nGreat, and if <PERSON> had an Army behind him you might have a point, but he hasn't.\n\n > To consider extreme possibilities (e.g. Black Swans) is not mysticism.\n\nNo, but it's utterly stupid in context because it takes you so far from the likely as to be absurd. <PERSON> carrying out an actual coup is on the same sort of level as Russia nuking us this week, the Army taking over because they've had enough, the Crown reverting to direct rule and abolishing the Parliamentary system, or the EU invading. It isn't credible and so it's not worth wasting energy on.", "236" ], [ "Yeah, I don't really get it either. I thought it'd go the other way (because the timing for a prorogation is always going to be political to some extent and there is a need for a new session...) but the reason I thought it would was largely because it didn't seem like it'd make much difference. \n\nThe situation is pretty extraordinary, and while a prorogation beyond the 31st or indeed one that tried to cover the whole session would have clearly been a problem for Parliament, the fact that legislation is in place, and Parliament would sit before we left made it seem political, but not pushing it too far.\n\nAs it is, I was wrong and we have somewhat clearer boundaries on prorogation, that's fine with me.. I'd maybe prefer some legislation to make it clearer still now (although after the FTPA maybe not..) but I don't see it changes anything.", "236" ], [ "This is absolutely right, if the Lib Dems could pull together an outright majority there is an argument that they'd still lack the numbers to revoke without there being a lot of push back (given the number of people likely to vote in a GE vs the referendum), but it'd indicate such a massive shift in public opinion as to likely make that irrelevant.\n\nI'd argue that the bigger issue (because a Lib Dem majority's vanishingly unlikely..) is the Lib Dem leader's comments about simply ignoring a second referendum that didn't go remain. That totally undercuts the narriative as far as I am concerned and obviously makes a second referendum almost entirely useless (if MP's are going to continue to justify their positions on the same basis as before a referendum, then what changes?)", "564" ], [ "> The vote must be..is this what you still want?\n\nIn that scenario shouldn't it be a leave vs remain referendum though? Or at best a leave vs remain referendum, followed by a 'how do we leave then' referendum, assuming Parliament still can't make a decision?\n\nThe problem with any referendum is going to be that there will be opposition to no-deal being an option and opposition to remain being an option, there will be opposition to a ranked referendum, and almost certainly issues in making it binding..\n\nAt that point it's not going to solve anything.", "564" ], [ "> Serious question. Why does your side continue to ignore the fact that the ERG (Hardcore Brexiteers) also voted the deals down?\n\nIt doesn't... The frustration seems to be with Parliament in general not being able to find a compromise, I'm as peeved with the ERG as I am with everyone else in terms of not delivering a deal that Parliament could get behind (and government for not working across parties for that matter).\n\n > Facts show, had they not continuously done so, Brexit would have already happened. They kept voting them down and tried to call a vote of no confidence in <PERSON> and lost.\n\nAbsolutely, they made leaving with a deal harder, because that's what they are aiming for, a no-deal. But you also now have a slew of parties who voted against a deal, but also legislated to leave the EU, who won't get behind a deal and don't want a no-deal.. That's a bit of a problem, and the blame can be cast pretty wide there too.\n\n > The issue is not Remainers nor the opposition. It’s the silly manchild like MPs in your own camp. Try thinking logically for yourself for once, look at the facts and stop parroting the nonsense on social media spread by <PERSON> and co.\n\nThe issue is with the remain side for not moving from 'remain vs leave' to 'how do we leave' and the leave side splintering into a set of different leave options and not being able to pull remain support to any of them, or concentrate leave support on a single one either.", "564" ], [ "> Not that I think a car randomly exploding is exactly the same as autopilot failing I will play devil's advocate here and say that if someone was injured as a direct result of the autopilot decision making process and that can be proved then the autopilot function is not operating normally and as it should.\n\nI'm not sure the second part follows. I'd assume that there are any number of scenarios where an injury could result from the autopilot operating exactly as it should, much as you can have a car accident even though you've done everything right. Say there is a car stopped around a corner and the autopilot sees it, but it is neither clear to move around it and can't stop in time (and so there is a collision), or a pedestrian walks out between traffic and the autopilot brakes, but hits a pot hole, or something on the road and skids slightly into a car..\n\n > If there is some situation which is completely unavoidable and the autopilot was given a choice between potentially hurting person A or potentially hurting person B then autopilot can hardly be blamed. \n\nExcept it could be and would be. much as a driver would be, the injured party might still have grounds to recover damages (especially if there is property damage...). Doubly so if the injured party isn't directly involved (car avoids a pedestrian, scrapes a parked car..\n\n > Of course with footage from the car itself these things should be much easier to discuss on an individual basis. \n\nThat's true, the reasonableness of the action would be easy to look at. However that's presumably where the car manufacturer hits a problem. They are the ones responsible for the programming and how decisions are made (or weighted). They presumably don't want every single accident to become a potential point of liability for them.\n\n > Point being that I don't think it's quite as simple as saying \"an injury caused while autopilot is active is/isn't a manufacturing defect\". I think it could be a manufacturing defect, but it also could just be the autopilot system being put in a bad position.\n\nIndeed, and it could be that the assumptions made in programming it didn't work out adequately in a given situation, it'll be a really interesting area of law as it develops.", "38" ], [ "I haven't got the specifics, but given it's gene therapy, it may well be very specifically targeted. So rather than it being one dose, it's effectively a process that is then tailored to an individual, if it's brand new the costs will likely be around the sequencing and production of a single therapy geared toward a single patient, which is pretty insane if you think about it.\n\nGranted, it still seems absurdly high in terms of costs (and it's the US, so...) but it's also entirely possible that it'll take a while to bring down costs as it becomes more commonly done.\n\nI suppose it's the difference between developing a drug you can then sell to thousands, if not millions of people (and so you can split your millions in R & D across a lot of people) and developing a treatment that will only work for one person (even if you can use the process again to some extent) and still costs a silly amount to do on a per 'dose' basis.\n\nSomeone who can read the links may have a better idea though.", "833" ], [ "> No Deal can only happen if the government defies democracy to make it happen. \n\nNo deal happens (because MP's legislated for an exit and the A50 notification) if MP's agree to leave with no-deal, or the EU doesn't agree to an extension.\n\n > If for some reason they refuse, we can unilaterally revoke article 50.\n\nWhat makes you think that there is a majority that would vote to revoke in the event that no extension is offered?\n\n > No 10 has no right to try to blackmail parliament into backing it with the threat of No Deal.\n\nOf course they do, it might be a weak threat in context, but its a perfectly valid one.", "236" ], [ "> For some reason you seem to be assuming that coup = > armed/military coup.\n\nNo, I'm assuming anything that meets the definition of a coup..\n\n > You also seem determined to restrict deliberation to legally-permissible activities.\n\nYes, because the PM acting illegally doesn't help him take the UK out of the EU, the UK's exit has to be in compliance with UK law, if it isn't, it'll be challenged (And again, the timings here mean that nothing will be last minute).\n\n > I am simply exploring the possibility of a coup (non-legal grab of power) by non-violent, non-military, partly-illegal means (lies, trickery, distortion, exagerration, blackmail, bribery, coercion, co-option, populism, incitement, sabotage, psychological brain-washing, media corruption, vote manipulation).\n\nRight, and so far its nonsense because you haven't described how it helps <PERSON> get over the two major barriers he has. The first being that he has to ask for an extension before the 19th, the second that the courts and Parliament can act to counter anything that he does that is not lawful.\n\n > The CCA in my opinion could be used as one plank in a (mixed legal + non-legal) strategy for a plutocratic group to grab the majority of power.\n\nHow? He can't repeal legislation, the CCA is subject to both parliamentary and judicial oversight, and its hard to use at all.\n\n > Yes of course it is improbable, but that does not excuse complacency.\n\nIt's completely beyond the bounds of what is probable, which makes it a bit pointless, as I said, there are millions of very improbable scenarios that could in theory be run through, but the only way the UK leaves the EU on the 31st with no-deal is if either the EU doesn't offer one, or Parliament agrees.\n\nA coup of any type would require <PERSON> to be able to hold power in the face of Parliament and the courts (and the rest of the state...) but illegally. That simply isn't viable.", "236" ], [ "I'd look at what else the Server is doing while you are downloading, first glance would suggest that either it's having an issue writing out the dowloaded file to disk (you are pulling it down faster than it can be written to disk) or you have something else utilising the disk/RAM/network at intervals. The reverse could also be true, the server doing the upload may be having issues reading the file when requested, or be 'doing' something else that is intermittently limiting the amount of data it is able to send.\n\nIn theory you might also have a network device/security appliance causing issues if it is say carrying out edge virus detection.. \n\nWhat else is happening process/memory wise? You want to narrow this down..", "938" ], [ "> Don't forget the BXP. Right now the Tories probably have a lot of traditional non-Tory voters following them because of their current stand. If this stand crumbles and fails at the last hurdle, I can see a lot of voters turning to the BXP. \n\nThat's the risk for <PERSON>, and I think arguably what happened with <PERSON> when she tried to play her 'You might end up with no-deal' to remainers, and 'you might end up with no-Brexit' to leavers, as well as her essentially ruling out no-deal toward the end. I can't see <PERSON> going that way, and while people seem to think that him failing to deliver an exit might be enough to push support away, I think it's more likely that it'll be seen as Parliament/Remain/Labour having stymied him from doing what he wants..\n\nI also vaguely get the impression we'll see BXP voters move back to the Tories in the face of an election, with the ones remaining being those who never voted Tory in the first place. I wonder if we'll see the Greens drop too again. The difference on the remain side however is that the Lib Dems have done a far better job at pulling support in that they can probably keep. To a certain extent the BXP problem is that they are pro-leave but also single issue, they are less credible in terms of a vote in the GE, the Lib Dems less so. That might mean that remain remains more split than the leave lot.\n\n > If the extension is requested and granted, and if Labour can keep it together for a few more weeks without shouting at each other, I think it is anyone's guess what happens next.\n\nThat's very true, and it only takes one fuck up or new issue. Which is why we are seeing everything that can be flung, being flung.", "365" ], [ "> A \"how to leave\" referrendum makes sense, and is a compromise for both sides.\n\nBut won't have support from the remain side, and has essentially no chance of passing in Parliament between people who only want a referendum with remain on it and those that don't want one.\n\n > A stay/leave rerun that invalidates the original vote does not.\n\nIt certainly doesn't solve anything, we'd just end up in the same place we are now.\n\n > Not a popular opinion here but its the reality. Banning such opinions only serves to cement this sub as a left leaning echo chamber. You're already so far out of touch as a group that sensible opinions like mine garner double didgit downvotes.\n\nSure, maybe to and take that to someone else though, and it's not as though it isn't obvious. I'd also add that no-one is banning any opinion, but rather that the demographic and political persuasion of the other people in this sub means you'll see more downvotes if a post doesn't fit within the general view of the sub.", "564" ], [ "To be fair, MP's are also using weird procedural tricks to avoid the results of laws they didn't like but passed, and don't want to repeal, while also avoiding a VONC in a government that clearly doesn't have the confidence of Parliament. The issue here is that there is no way to move forward in any direction, beyond asking for more time, but without any clarity on what that time would be used for.", "236" ], [ "I think from an EU perspective, and from a 'lots of UK voters' perspective, going from we don't know how we are going to leave the EU to, we are going to have an election, but still don't know what that means in terms of leaving the EU doesn't shift things very far. After all, a quite likely outcome of a General Election is a Parliament that is opposed to no-deal, won't pass the existing deal, won't repeal the Withdrawal Act or revoke A50 and so on. A slight Tory majority seems most likely, a Tory minority with DUP support seems next most likely, assuming the Tories lose, you end up with a Labour minority government (Which at best means we have a GE, then a referendum, and then potentially issues passing the outcome of that referendum when it goes leave, and we are 12 months down the line..).", "564" ], [ "It's likely that they will be broadly what they are now. Labour offering a second referendum between remain and a Labour deal, the Tories offering a deal, but no-deal in the event of not being able to pass one, BXP offering no-deal regardless, the Lib Dems offering revoke.\n\nIf, as is entirely likely, none of them get a big enough majority to deliver on that directly it doesn't move things forward, if Labour were to get a majority (which I'd love to see, but seems unlikely) there would be a period before another referendum and a need to put together a deal, and for the commons to legislate, if we end up with a Lab/Lib C & S or a Tory/BXP C & S or a Tory/DUP C & S it gets messier still.", "365" ], [ "In theory yes, but you have the same issue with Parliament. Any referendum would have to be binding with legislation being passed in advance, would remain MP's sign off on legislation that takes the UK out of the EU without them having a further say? Probably not, same goes for ERG MP's who wouldn't want to sign off on a deal. \n\nThen you have the issue of the question, there is a very good chance that MP's aren't going to agree to having no-deal as a referendum outcome, if that's the case there will be opposition from the increasing numbers of leave supporters who, however insanely, see that as a preference to the deal. If that means a significantly lower turnout or an active campaign to boycott a referendum, it kills legitimacy (plus, any binding referendum is almost certainly going to have a minimum turnout threshold).\n\nAnd of course if you end up running a non-binding referendum, there is nothing to force MP's from doing what they are doing now in terms of not supporting positions that they don't agree with, if it goes to remain we have to revoke A50 and repeal the EUWA, if it goes to leave with a deal, MP's would have to sign off on a deal, if it went to no-deal MP's would be somewhat more boxed in (That's the default in the existing legislation) but could still work to prevent it.\n\nI'd also bet that Labour in particular sees a referendum on the current deal (rather than a 'Labour deal') as a problem because the opposition generated at the time of the 'meaningful votes' could well spill it to a no-deal leave outcome (Especially if its a preference vote).", "564" ], [ "I'm not suggesting that at all, my point is that there is no point in doing so unless the outcome of that is actually implemented, and there are a slew of barriers. A GE might help overcome some of those, or it might not.\n\nRealistically, the best chance we have in actually finding a working solution would be to find a deal that Parliament can actually get behind rather than having to play off hard remain vs hard leave with no-one wanting to do support the existing WA.\n\nThe issue I see right now is that an extension gets us nowhere in and of itself, it only opens the door to more time to finding a solution. A GE potentially doesn't actually provide a solution on its own, neither does a referendum unless its binding which seems impossible. So.. I don't know, I'd rather have an extension and 2 months of pure 'Parliament working with the EU, to get a deal' than 'lets hope something shakes out of a GE / Referendum etc.. that doesn't just piss everyone off or maintain the deadlock.", "236" ], [ "> I think if the public supported the WA then most MPs would vote for it. If the public supported no deal then it's harder to argue against it, if the public supported remain then that gives you cover to revoke article 50\n\nSure, but if we end up (which again, isn't unlikely..) that no-deal or the current WA gets the most second preference votes in a multi-choice, rather than a convincing majority it will cause an issue. As would any 'close' referendum result, which, given the country seems largely as split as it was in 2016, isn't unlikely either.\n\nA GE or second referendum might yield a decisive outcome if things changed, but as it is, a narrow win for one of the leave options seems likely, and that seems likely to run into opposition from both remain supporters and leave supporters who don't like that outcome (ERG/Labour). If anything a GE has the potential for the largest shift as that is filtered through FPTP (so we could end up with one group getting a larger majority than votes alone would justify.", "564" ], [ "Thinking of buying a BMW K75S... Thoughts?\n\nA mate is getting rid of his as he doesn't ride it, it's well maintained and in good condition and he'd like it to go to someone who will ride it.. It's quite a bit bigger than anything I've ridden and obviously not a new bike but I had been meaning to look for something that I could enjoy riding at the weekend and for an occasional commute..\n\nI hadn't however even mildly considered a bike that falls into the 'classic' category so.. I'm a tad torn.", "318" ], [ "> Are you mechanically inclined or experienced? \n\nYes! I mildly figured an older bike might be a bonus in that regard too, but I haven't looked at it properly to see where the line between 'I'll sort that' and 'needs to go into the shop' would be.\n\n > Do you want to become an expert at poring over parts diagrams, finding old parts and creating solutions where the original documentation has faded into obscurity?\n\nNo, but he has a decent mech who does his MOT's and seems to have a line on parts and they seem to be readily available, not that he seems to spend much on it in terms of maintenance, if anything I was more worried that it's not the most economic bike to ride in terms of fuel (but weekends and the occasional commute mitigates that, it's not like I'll be riding 15k/miles a year..", "318" ], [ "> I suspect house price increases over last 10 years in UK have had a bigger impact on gdp growth than everything we produce and export.\n\nThere is pretty much no chance of that being close to accurate, buying a newly built house obviously has a direct impact on GDP, buying and selling existing houses has a much, much smaller one, and UK manufacturing is pretty massive, as are domestic services. \n\nHousing is a massive factor in individual wealth, and house price growth will have contributed to that significantly, but not GDP. \n\nAs to interest rate rises, I'd suggest it'd have to be a very, very significant increase to have a real impact on prices, if only because interest rates are absurdly low and because for a huge proportion of mortgage holders, they would be able to weather a trebling or more of the retail rate without too much of a problem. If we see the sort of 12%+ rates we saw in the 70's & 80's etc.. you'd start to see issues, but likely more for recent buyers, who would also be those most likely to end up with negative equity.. So only a relatively small portion.", "73" ], [ "> The only real way I can see out of the bubble is a slow one, and that's sustained stagnation. We need house prices not to rise for a decade or more.\n\nThat's pretty much it, ramp up supply in areas where people want to buy, so keeping demand below the level of supply and removing the upward pressure on prices, do it long enough that inflation starts to eat into the real value of the property and wage increases make houses relatively more affordable.", "302" ], [ "> Average house price is South East is c£450k, and 5-10% pa increases occur in some areas.\n\nThat's almost double the UK average, they'd have still needed around 200k 12 years ago to buy it and the mortgage would have had to have been affordable for them at that point, so they wouldn't have been earning 30k/y then. \n\n > I know a fair amount of ppl who reckon their house 'earns' more a year than they do. \n\nIt's not unheard of, but it tends to be people who bought houses a long time ago and who are paying very little in mortgage payments as a result (certainly relative to rent..) and have all their equity in property because it has appreciated. You also however likely know a fair few people who don't own houses and vastly more people who earn significantly more annually than the value of their house increases.. \n\n > Add remortgaging / equity release and its a huge chunk of our economy at risk to interest rate increases.\n\nObviously interest rates have a huge impact on the economy regardless, and on growth driven by borrowing, I'm not sure that there is good evidence to suggest that house price growth is a significant driver of economic growth more broadly though and it sure as shit doesn't come close to the contribution from wider domestic production.", "488" ], [ "Not as far as I am aware for this type of good, and France would have been able to challenge it. Essentially you are looking at Article 34 and 36 of the TFEU (and the case law around it.. article 35 is about banning exports btw...).\n\nSo, article 34:\n\n**Article 34** (ex Article 28 TEC)\n\n*Quantitative restrictions on imports and all measures having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States.*\n\nNow article 36 sounds like it allows fairly arbitrary limits to be set if you ignore that last section (And arguably that's where the case law is relevant):\n\n**Article 36** (ex Article 30 TEC)\n\n*The provisions of Articles 34 and 35 shall not preclude prohibitions or restrictions on imports, exports or goods in transit justified on grounds of public morality, public policy or public security; the protection of health and life of humans, animals or plants; the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value; or the protection of industrial and commercial property. Such prohibitions or restrictions shall not, however, constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.*\n\nHappily, the EU provides a nice little [fact sheet](_URL_0_) that goes into a fair bit of detail, including the case law and is worth reading.", "631" ], [ "> Here's a thought ... maybe the English public consists predominantly of bigoted, toxic, sad, dysfunctional, ignorant people who are just too stubborn and arrogant to change their ways despite that the rest of the developed world is leaving them behind?\n\nIt's certainly a thought, I don't think it's a particularly profound or accurate one (and obviously the conclusion is incorrect).\n\nYou are right about republicanism being fairly unpopular though, I do wonder how much that has to do with an opposition to change and the lack of enthusiasm for the alternatives, not to mention the cultural association people have with the UK being a monarchy (it's in the name, the emblems, various organisations etc...). Obviously all of that could be replicated in a republic, but I'm not sure there is enough demand.", "579" ], [ "> I'd say it has more to do with the UK being a failed state that is more obsessed with clinging on to the past when we were a relevant country rather than having any interest in taking steps to ensure we're relevant in the future.\n\nI think my point would again broadly be that that's simply not very accurate. The UK clearly isn't a failed state by any reasonable definition, it is still relevant (albeit not close to being a superpower as it was up until WWII), and it is taking steps to ensure that it remains relevant.\n\n > From the monarchy, to the lack of investment in tech to putting all the countries funds into the elderly while ignoring the youth unfortunately it's as clear as day.\n\nThe monarchy isn't really relevant in context. You have a point about investment (although I'd go wider than tech), and spending on the elderly is arguably a holdover from trying to deal with pension poverty in the 90's. The huge issue there (as in other parts of society) is inequality. That said, the UK isn't uniquely bad in any of these areas, indeed it tends to be pretty good compared to its peers.\n\n > We just have too many old people due to the size of the baby boom generation and the nations priorities have skewed far too much to looking back at the past than looking at what we could do in the future\n\nI'm not sure that's true either, you are right to say that there is some political pandering to older people (they vote..) and we saw that that cost <PERSON> in 2017 and arguably that <PERSON> pushing that way on WASPI women too. I don't think you can look at the UK and suggest it isn't forward looking though. The UK does do well when it comes to research and development, it does a good job relative to its european peers on tech, and seems pretty committed to education and creating opportunity. Although again, access to that is not equal. \n\n > The monarchy makes me ashamed to be British but in truth it's probably a sad but accurate reflection of the British people.\n\nThat's unfortunate for you, but it's hardly universal and I'd assume for most people it's not really something they see as a significant issue.", "579" ], [ "Lords reform and electoral reform are both almost certainly more relevant, although as with any massive constitutional change, it really does have to be done properly. I sort of vaguely get the notion that some people think that institutional reform (like binning the monarchy..) will lead to political change rather than realising that political change is likely needed to drive any institutional reform (and that that institutional reform should be gradual and be careful not to come with a load of problematic unintended consequences like we saw with the FTPA).", "207" ], [ "> No, they're not \"hard to impossible\" to change.\n\nThey are hard to impossible to change within an EU context as they essentially require broad consensus across the EU, quite a bit of legislation and treaty change.\n\n > This merely goes back to the economic debate in the 1970s. I do not accept that <PERSON> had the correct ideas. I think her analysis was superficial and fatally wrong.\n\nI completely agree with you, but a lot of that was embedded in the set up of the single market and is part of what we are seeing in terms of the EU's direction.\n\n > I think Thatcherite neoliberalism was fundamentally a wrong turn, and need to seek to undo it rather than build on top of it.\n\nSure and that's viable outside of the EU, but not within it.", "437" ], [ "> Yup, I tend to do that. Easier than deleting and reposting. Who cares, these are very casual discussions\n\nIt's a tad confusing when you do it after a reply that quotes the initial one. It doesn't matter, but you know, it does make it look like I'm quoting random crap you didn't say.\n\n > You may be correct, and that would be a legitimate reason for leaving the EU.\n\nI'd actually take it a step further, it means that the issues revert to being a domestic political issue and part of the domestic political discourse. Governments can't simply point at the EU and parties have more scope to present implementable economic policies across the full range and we get to hold the accountable for it.\n\nI think there is a strong argument to say that that absolutely was one of the reasons why people vote to leave the EU.", "437" ], [ "It's an interesting dilemma, I'd like to elect the head of state, but to a certain extent I'm also not sure if an elected head of state is a great idea, it would depend on the powers they had. If they are elected, I'd sort of expect them to have some power, throw in that if they are elected they'd be political by default and it's not neccesarily a net positive (for a lot of change). And I have massive reservations about a written constitution.\n\nI think it probably comes down to the reality being quite complex and there not being a lot of simple answers to the issues people have, and of course that even with shitty approaches, when they've evolved over decades, they tend to include quite a few good bits that are hard to replicate without creating a similarly problematic set-up, or something complicated that could lead to some nasty unintended consequences.", "593" ], [ "The Irish Presidency is probably about as close as you can get (function wise anyway) to the crown, up to and including the customary apolitical element, but yeah, the constitutional upheaval would still be massive and it'd need to be really well put together. It's one of those slightly bizarre areas where I feel like a shock event (independence/liberation etc..) tend to be a better driver as it's the country acting in unison, rather than something that comes out of an almost always partisan political process.", "236" ], [ "> I would have thought it could have been argued under one of those non-economic considerations.\n\nYup, because that's what it sounds like, this is the case with a lot of EU law, but it's not, this tends to lead to massive misunderstandings around what controls EU member states actually retain, it comes down to a fundamental failure to understand how the shared competencies work. And happily we have an EC statement on exactly this that is able to express it far more clearly than I could:\n\n**3 August 2012\nE-006033/2012**\n\n*Council Directive 98/58/EC on the protection of animals kept for farming purposes allows Member States to apply within their territories stricter provisions for the protection of animals, provided they are in compliance with the general rules of the EU Treaties.*\n\n*The Commission considers that not allowing trade of foie gras between Member States, on animal welfare grounds, would be in breach of Article 34 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Such quantitative restrictions are prohibited between Member States.*\n\n*The Commission considers that in the case of foie gras the grounds invoked in Article 36 of TFEU to prohibit or restrict the marketing between Member States cannot be applied, since foie gras production is covered by Directive 98/58/EC concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes.* \n\n*The European Court of Justice has held in its judgment in the case Hedley Lomas (Case C‑5/94) that recourse to Article 36 is no longer possible where [Union] law has already provided for harmonisation (par.18).*", "437" ], [ "> Right, so not at all confusing XD OK so we couldn't have blocked them on grounds of mistreatment of animals - pretty daft.\n\nYup, I worked with some MEP's a few years ago on civil liberties, it's amazing how many seemingly obvious statements within the treaties and charter (and directives..) aren't, or where judgements and interactions with other legislation fundamentally change what they actually achieve. That's a feature of legislation generally of course (you can't read it as plain english, and often other legislation amends, or courts constrain or expand), but it does make it harder than it should be to determine what the rules are. \n\n > Since our now current position is we don't want to make it and (when they do it) we don't want it in the UK, could we not just have made it illegal to possess though? Akin to drugs? Would that have provided a mechanism to ban imports? Portugal/Netherlands is what comes to mind.\n\nNo, and for broadly the same reasons, the UK could restrict excise goods, it could act on goods that are restricted and where the EU hasn't harmonised the rules as such (say firearms..), distinct rules apply to pharmaceuticals, drugs, and so on.. But where EU legislation and UK legislation clash in an area of shared competency, it's the EU's legislation essentially that takes precedent. \n\nMaking it illegal to possess would amount to Quantitative restrictions on imports in essentially exactly the same way. It's the same reason why when things like the net neutrality legislation passed, it strengthened the regimes in countries that didn't already have protections, but weakened protections in the Netherlands (where stronger protections already existed). The protections in the Netherlands would after all have undermined the internal market by limiting market access.", "631" ], [ "No problem at all, it's really quite interesting (given what the EU is, the balance between states and the EU as an organisation, and the sort of cooperation/delegation required to make a market across a whole set of borders, different legal approaches and so on work). \n\nTo be honest this feels a bit like the 'The UK could have done more to restrict EU migration' argument, it's technically just about true, but realistically freedom of movement is one of the four freedoms (people, goods, services and capital) that the EU designed to facilitate, so individual member states can't really do much to limit it.\n\nAnyway, glad you found the above helpful.", "437" ], [ "To be honest, I tend to find that it makes more sense to take a position based on what you think/believe/want rather than who else does or doesn't support it. The vote was going to happen, it was unlikely that there would be another opportunity and done is usually better than perfect.\n\nSeems odd not to take a position in that context, indeed being neutral would effectively be taking a position in favour of the status quo (and you had literal pro-EU fascists too..).", "856" ], [ "> But it's not certain what I want since Leave is a risky decision with lots of opportunity cost.\n\nThat's an entirely reasonable position.\n\n > It's equivalent to a difficult problem in maths, where you don't know the answer. Only a fool is going to have a definite \"opinion\" when you can't possibly know the answer.\n\nI'd disagree with that, it's a subjective question about governance. That said, if you can't come to a decision because balancing the various factors is difficult and there is too much variation in the projections, then not voting makes as much sense as anything else.", "845" ], [ "That's true of any political decision, not least as they tend to have wide and broad social and economic impact. Even electing an MP can lead to poor consequences. When it comes to democracy generally the idea is surely to make a decision based on what you want, preferably in as well an informed manner as you can and so have a say in how your society is run?", "593" ], [ "I'd have likely noticed it anyway just because I tend to read through these threads including the heavily downvoted ones (not a masochist, but I do mod ths sub so..). Others not so much.\n\nThe issue with much of this is around the general leanings of the sub, stuff will often get downvoted even if it's a reasonable question or statement if it is on the wrong side of a polarising subject, even where it's wrong. Short of utterly abusing the sub and pinning posts/comments that isn't likely to change rapidly, although I do get the impression that discussion is being voted on less one-sidedly more recently and that we are seeing a little bit of a broader set of views.\n\nAnd yeah, I hate it when I see informative posts getting downvoted below the visibility threshold, about the only things you can do is upvote and reply, and do look at things in those collapsed threads..", "263" ], [ "My (older) cat eats mushrooms and broccoli if you leave them out (more of a problem when the kids were young), anything with actual meat in it is fair game, cat food, dog food, people food up to a point, anything that drops to the floor etc.. Our younger cat tries to eat from the bin, its a significant training challenge.\n\nThe pair of them managed to steal and eat a breaded pork steak yesterday (cooling for freezing, they worked together to remove the metal grate over the dish..). My eldest literally used to come home with other peoples teaspoons attached to her mag-collar. Both of mine will happily eat almost anything, never mind having a brand preference.. Although on the plus side, that food drive also makes them somewhat trainable (they respond to 'sit' so fast its absurd, you can make her fall off things because she'll prioritise getting her arse down on a surface over being on a stable surface, all because we got them to sit before feeding them...).\n\nSome cats are picky bastards, some really, really aren't.", "287" ], [ "> Some questions being impossible doesn't mean that all questions are impossible. That is true not just in politics, but in science, mathematics, and life in general.\n\nPolitical questions are almost always subjective, you have an outcome you prefer and then there are different routes to get there, at best you have evidence to support one approach or another. There is rarely certainly, there is always complexity.\n\n > There being complexity in the world, doesn't somehow give you a free pass to spout whatever random nonsense enters your head and ever after insist on it dogmatically.\n\nNo.. And if I were doing that you'd have a point.. I, like you, and everyone else do however get to have a view on how we'd like society to work, on priorities and on outcomes we'd like to see for themselves or others. That doesn't require dogma, although there are political frameworks and ideologies that offer a consistent approach that people can and take from (often with a body of evidence and support around it..).\n\n > I'm open to the possibility of being wrong. \n\nAbsolutely, I am too and I go out of my way to challenge positions I've come to and try to make sure I understand the positions that the people I disagree with hold and why.\n\n > I don't think it's remotely on the cards that I'm wrong on climate change, on <PERSON> being harmful to the world, on the Tory economic programme and Tory corruption being harmful to the UK.\n\nSure, same here, and while I probably don't spend a lot of time looking for things I've missed on climate change or <PERSON>, I do try to look at economic policy outcomes and discuss that, and indeed look at the discussions around corruption to make sure I understand the issues and where the facts meet hyperbole etc.. I doubt my view that the Tories are a net negative for the UK would change either, unless their policy positions changed significantly. \n\n > Brexit, though, was much harder to slice either way.\n\nIt is harder to slice, but far from impossible, and you can reduce it to principles (where you hold relevant ones that are important..). The question would presumably become one of whether there was a principle at stake for you either way. If there wasn't, then that's obviously entirely reasonable. \n\n > Being agnostic about Brexit doesn't imply that I should sit on the fence about every single issue.\n\nI don't think anyone suggested that either. My point was that it was a political question that can be answered and almost always would be answered on the basis of persoanl preference, it is subjective. Hopefully the choice made would be supported by evidence and fact, but the underlying question is still a subjective one.\n\n > It's really surprising that I have to spell this out. How can you be that confused?\n\nYou don't, but you don't really seem to have understood my point, so maybe that's the issue.", "1019" ], [ "> I feel that that's kinda how we seem to be leaning more as a society, or maybe I've just noticed it more. As a remainer I posted the foie gras article in another thread elsewhere, brexiters jumped on it goading remainers, remainers brushed it off as so what. I'm just sat there shaking my head wondering why we can't give credit where it's due and not act like arses with fingers in their ears ignoring or avoiding anything that disagree with them or their ideas. If you've seen an opposing trend on the sub, that's a good thing IMO.\n\nThat's arguably (as a leaver) the tune I've been singing for a long time. We needed much more discussion and an understanding of the 'other' viewpoint. Instead we had a lot of people arguing against caricatures of their opposition and too little focus on what we wanted for the UK or EU going forward. That ship obviously sailed a long time ago, but it has been massively polarising. And yea, I feel like there is a little bit of a shift on some areas, perhaps at least in part because the immediacy (referendum date, then A50 trigger or not, then the revoke thing, then the two 'no-deal' risks) is dropping away a bit, maybe just exhaustion.. We'll see I suppose.\n\n > And I could see how pinning comments could be abusive to an extent, but then in our exchange, your comments were upvoted and I feel those deserved pinning because, well, they're informative, they're upvoted, and they'll be hidden because the parent comment is/was being downvoted. I'd feel that could be an acceptable case, but that's me.\n\nAbusive in the sense that the tools we have are limited and so we can only pin things at the top of threads, and to a certain extent it means picking arguments that you think are good vs what floats to the top. Although your point about decoupling a good comment that is below one that has been downvoted is a decent one, it's just not doable without pulling the comment out of context and mod intervention (and since we are all fascists/communists/woke/whatever that'd hit a fair bit of pushback too, and weirdly community support is required for any of this to work).\n\nOh and with self-posts you do immediately run back into the issue you describe in your first paragraph too.", "579" ], [ "> No, they're not. \n\nYes, they are, because they always rest on an intended outcome that people think is good, what people think is good is almost always subjective. \n\nFor example, I'd argue that the state killing people in cold blood is never justifiable, as such the death penalty is bad. Others would argue that the state killing people for vicious crimes against others is right and so the death penalty is good. That's a subjective position, it involves a moral and a political choice. \n\nImplementing one or the other is a different matter (you can have an entirely evidence based discussion about execution methods, or how you hold long term prisoners..).\n\n > The legitimate and defensible core of political decision-making is purely centered on the empirical as opposed to the \"subjective\".\n\nExcept it's not. You have three different things here, the expected outcomes (most people want to improve people's lives), the ideological, which often includes something of a definition of what that improvement should involve, and the implementation. That last one is evidence based, does the policy do what the politician has said they want to achieve or not. \n\n > \"Subjective\" makes it sound like you're deciding on a different flavour of ice cream. \n\nI can't help it if you don't like the term, but it doesn't change the fact that politics is subjective, peoples aims are built around personal preference and priorities and what they think is good and right for them and their societies. Oddly enough, people disagree on what a good society looks like, what is important for an individual and what it is reasonable to do to get there.", "230" ] ]
207
[ 15172, 6022, 23306, 18641, 22807, 18852, 4502, 15046, 7108, 22352, 18358, 3062, 8247, 3478, 11022, 8777, 25185, 11351, 11099, 13074, 1698, 6336, 21483, 20566, 23827, 16823, 9284, 10455, 25094, 605, 3955, 16408, 20835, 21067, 2331, 10055, 3363, 12153, 14985, 19149, 15739, 24999, 15111, 15478, 23765, 12142, 16629, 15673, 16636, 9798, 23285, 642, 1297, 23019, 231, 1512, 7838, 5088, 22157, 10149, 20791, 12132, 8739, 22052, 18982, 5687, 4721, 15576, 12561, 19460, 21029, 10360, 25497, 16795, 18235, 7567, 15390, 18502, 16613, 3257, 2745, 8364, 7252, 21117, 22187, 15307, 1924, 3534, 15426, 3335, 21605, 6362, 10548, 1962, 6010, 12097, 17588, 25019, 22608, 21864, 10586, 4377, 10032, 11360, 981, 13794, 1178, 7864, 8888, 24867, 20487, 24554, 2922, 6525, 15540, 24497, 24444, 8390, 1250, 682, 18668, 1987, 16053, 22449, 2899, 17780, 17523, 15313, 12863, 952, 3820, 15525, 5144, 10519, 23419, 11434, 8796, 21295, 16328, 4227, 17977, 9598, 19285, 14241, 13310, 7358, 13026, 16310, 12660, 16940, 7448, 17874, 23740, 12292, 450, 21835, 5554, 7780, 6167, 10399, 407, 24060, 6478, 19451, 9140, 21069, 16783, 3579, 11093, 6366, 2630, 4647, 280, 24300, 22542, 24044, 23478, 3140, 18893, 9551, 17833, 7973, 18039, 4509, 18418, 8447, 19998, 13654, 10270, 18938, 21717, 16146, 13390, 4366, 15524, 18338, 2135, 21195, 3468, 18135, 6556, 22530, 16752, 866, 17176, 12598, 1451, 8815, 886, 19821, 6342, 18952, 18775, 19127, 1648, 16170, 5394, 15210, 4348, 12612, 23390, 23284, 19667, 582, 18705, 12327, 21855, 25062, 14013, 23426, 12680, 24658, 25480, 13500, 19079, 20656, 18028, 17873, 24808, 683, 14495, 19649, 14138, 1138, 7821, 789, 37, 4611, 8655, 2493, 9268, 3745, 954, 593, 6500, 11990, 14491, 16180, 21148, 22556, 14004, 21388, 18281, 20312, 6173, 14308, 18384, 24501, 11425, 17258, 16255, 21883, 19178, 18636, 1316, 250, 8939, 1515, 4782, 10632, 2153, 7700, 17161, 24523, 10047, 20463, 10694, 23758, 21947, 11913, 17213, 15109, 5920, 14415, 3055, 13921, 1183, 2530, 5693, 1440, 13380, 21115, 12070, 5381, 17086, 13145, 2670, 15285, 15398, 9736, 23445, 14064, 16141, 10601, 19800, 8358, 20482, 21832, 20654, 18921, 24456, 2241, 2018, 2705, 10124, 4682, 9492, 8626, 11352, 1283, 3665, 25342, 24382, 590, 15882, 9193, 9296, 15689, 24978, 8598, 8286, 15572, 4430, 22883, 3323, 4493, 25446, 20718, 13641, 17145, 7930, 24630, 20483, 21090, 13920, 4182, 4952, 6479, 19025, 13407, 18440, 23101, 19381, 14969, 2571, 3213, 22268, 24296, 3339, 7847, 3010, 18728, 5462, 22801, 14790, 23198, 237, 5859, 16237, 17649, 13662, 835, 11189, 24831, 16880, 8057, 15582, 7653, 5928, 14709, 14963, 15781, 19047, 17462, 812, 9597, 10674, 20011, 9849, 4681, 12921, 2335, 25306, 7671, 13138, 8567, 4058, 15667, 22501, 14609, 5149, 18743, 24869, 16361, 24678, 21972, 1240, 549, 14820, 3537, 13787, 22249, 4838, 12399, 10384, 23308, 1452, 20040, 11896, 16847, 22313, 9460, 1949, 15787, 20374, 22712, 9256, 24851, 17793, 21569, 7054, 803, 750, 17901, 8460, 4105, 4618, 22078, 1660, 14362, 21711, 970, 11204, 12965, 5999, 7705, 10859, 24787, 8853, 4857, 11839, 23259, 13923, 19676, 5444, 8679, 15102, 2022, 227, 1168, 6450, 25125, 17506, 20510, 3117, 14425, 17724, 1708, 18096, 6521, 25239, 1287, 14689, 1239, 19291, 13541, 16106, 4572, 5792, 9497, 24929, 11506, 12491, 7159, 7514, 1880, 22257, 9195, 9161 ]
reddit_dump_-eagle73
[ [ "I can't believe anyone thought Crystal Palace were going to win.\n\nHalf an hour before the match I put a small DNB on Newcastle because Palace gave Burnley of all teams a win, they're still without <PERSON>, and Newcastle isn't *so* bad as to mess up against a team with these factors. I was sure it'd be a draw but at least I won something.\n\nI think even with <PERSON>, Palace can be shit at times. We drew with them except ours was a legit goal and theirs came from a penalty, they otherwise couldn't get one in.", "720" ], [ "The first at 2040-2041, as anyone can guess, was the Realistic Population mod. I knew the consequences but I was sick of having one tile using only high density residential max out at 50K so I went for it.\n\nThe second period between 2066 and 2071 was thanks to the second mod, now lesser known because more people use the Lifecycle Rebalance mod, which I didn't want to use because of everything else that came with it in changing defaults in the game. It's [this mod](_URL_0_) that randomises ages of people moving in, and does the same for their education levels.\n\nI didn't have the traditional death wave issue of hearses causing traffic, but a lot of the working population did retire/die at once and it wrecked sections of my office and commercial. The mod helped make it manageable.\n\nIt's both stressful and fun to throw mods like these into the middle of a save. The latter saved me, the former took some time to manage but I solved most of its issues fairly quickly, even changing up the roads and testing it with TMPE's vehicle spawn disabled to see my traffic comes to 85%.", "829" ], [ "I lost money too (went for Liverpool + o1.5) but I'm a Brighton fan so I was kind of pleased with that decision. It was clearly a foul and that's not even from a place of bias - another user already explained that <PERSON>'s foot got kicked, there was no fight for the ball. People call it hypocrisy because of no penalty being given to AV against Brighton last week, but it's not the same as <PERSON> was clearly going for the ball, not someone's leg. Liverpool were playing rough especially with the first penalty given, it's not a surprise that they'd do it again.\n\nThey didn't spend long inspecting <PERSON>'s goal but I wanted to see it since it otherwise looked like a good one compared to anything <PERSON> was doing. That's twice <PERSON> was quick to go for offside chances.", "549" ], [ "> especially redittors will speak confidently on a subject that they've never researched\n\nEvolution is probably the biggest. Whenever there's a thread asking why humans do something, someone will always appear to fudge a fairy tale response about how it helped our ancestors, even though they don't back it up with anything and often make it up as they go along.\n\nAnother example I know is internet-wide, where people believe that the American accent came from the old standard English accent, which people believe was widely rhotic (pronouncing the R).\n\nThis is parroted so much nowadays, nobody cares to research to find the existence of the West Country accent, which is rhotic, or even consider the Irish accent's influence on the American accent.", "931" ], [ "Shouldn't give a fuck about what people are saying, I watch the Sky highlights and see everyone cry in the comments because their beloved Liverpool (even non supporters) didn't get the win, but at the end of the day it was all square. That penalty was properly given, maybe Liverpool players shouldn't be so violent, and <PERSON> would've had them ahead if he was able to score legitimately and not rely on trying to violate offside rules. <PERSON>'s was a legit mistake but <PERSON> was very clearly offside twice.\n\nPeople will almost always say it's not fair when the underdog causes trouble but that's their problem. Many are even now saying it's wrong that we got given a penalty but <PERSON> didn't against us last week even though it isn't the same thing. None of them will bother to remember how the clock ran on when we played Man U, allowing them a penalty.", "806" ], [ "I don't see faults in <PERSON> as much as I do with <PERSON>, but after seeing <PERSON> perform, I am very open to him being on much more. He wasn't spectacular or anything, plus we didn't really get a chance since Spurs took very few shots overall, but I want to see what he can do in several matches.\n\nI can't recall much from the West Brom match for hints of them two getting at each other, probably because I was too busy yelling at the screen like a drunk granddad, but if <PERSON> flings shit at <PERSON> for letting one in then <PERSON> himself can get 10x back for generally being detrimental to the team.", "549" ], [ "What's funny about this is how riled up both sides of the YouTube highlights comment section were over the ref. We were annoyed that they ruled penalty for <PERSON> diving, everyone else is annoyed that <PERSON>'s goal was given.\n\nI don't care if it sounds biased - <PERSON> knew what he was doing, and the guy pleading for a foul to invalidate <PERSON>'s goal was only doing it because the goal was scored, he was otherwise fine and could be seen playing up until that point. It was a foul but he really didn't seem to make a case of it until it really inconvenienced him, and it's not as if refs have overlooked other fouls before, even against us.\n\nWhat really needs to be stopped is these stupid decisions. There have been more biased refs against us this season so <PERSON> wasn't too bad, I don't actually know who makes the final decision if VAR is called upon.\n\nI remember one time last season <PERSON> straight up got a yellow for diving and it was far less obvious than <PERSON>'s tactic, I don't recall the last time anyone got punished for diving this season despite players hungry for penalties now. These rulings are turning football into theatrics more than a sport now, for who can look more sad and injured.\n\nThat <PERSON> goal was excellent though. That match really should've been 1-1.", "203" ], [ "The first one. There's so many posts on there about \"OMG AMERICANSISMSMSMS MAKING THEIR WAY HERE I HATE IMPROPER ENGLISH\", [look through the comments here](_URL_0_) and I can only picture these people as some cross between snobby upper class and a typical English super villain in an American movie.\n\nI don't know how to compare it in American terms, maybe just snobs. Just remember that not everyone is like that. This sub's generally full of decent people, so is /r/CasualUK.", "579" ], [ "We don't have huge developments like this where I'm from so for a long time I'd only seen these in Cities Skylines screenshots from players planning ahead. It's faint but you can see how huge the planned neighbourhood is. This is located north west of Albuquerque, New Mexico, if you want to see it yourself and zoom in.\n\nEDIT: The only street view available shows that there are *some* houses here and a lot of dirt roads but I assumed it was planned out for future use. Any Americans feel free to correct me if this actually turns out to be some sacred ritual to spawn traffic masters from the sky or something.", "904" ], [ "How much customisability do these frameworks allow, if we wanted to do our own economy set up?\n\nIs OneSync completely optional/a luxury feature? Or is it 100% a prerequisite to opening a FiveM server? I can't really find much reading about it at all, whether it's optional or not, and if it is then what performance is like without it. Its running cost and slot limitations make it sound very problematic.", "570" ], [ "I don't actually listen to MF DOOM at all but KMD's two albums are among my favourites of 90s east coast, his death* makes listening to their albums a much different experience. It was eerie enough knowing <PERSON> has been dead for a while but now both of them are gone.\n\nEDIT: closest thing I listen to under his DOOM persona was the [Gas Drawls demo from 1994](_URL_0_) which may be an unknown treat for some of you.", "788" ], [ "I didn't really like any of his music as <PERSON> (had never heard of MF DOOM until checking KMD comment sections on YT years ago) but he was pretty deep in early 90s east coast. In his KMD days Mr <PERSON> was a pretty abstract project for 1991, he addressed the US Senate at one point with his then rhyming partner <PERSON> (who's still alive but is very low profile) and there was a whole connection between them and talents like <PERSON>, Kurious, LONS (<PERSON>) and others.\n\nIt's probably not many people's flavour but <PERSON> and <PERSON> are nice albums. Even between those two years he'd gone from a religious, conscious teenager to an angry, drug experimenting, still conscious young adult, and that's before his brother died (arguably what got his brother killed too).", "419" ], [ "What we're aiming to do goes beyond just changing values which is why I'm wondering whether ESX is a good route or whether we should opt to put in the work and make our own framework.\n\nI figured that would be the case - there are literally no comparisons out there between OneSync and no OneSync, because coming from RAGEMP I'm actually used to terrible sync anyway so I'm wondering how bad it actually is. Is there any way to test it? I suppose as a group of three/four, we could get a key, locally host our own server and have OneSync disabled in the config or something?", "570" ], [ "By the way I may as well ask since you're a server owner - I know it's against FiveM's terms of service for server owners to profit off of FiveM, so I assume traditional RP server shops are out of the question, but are server owners allowed to set up donations from players to pay for costs like OneSync and hosting?", "63" ], [ "I think free access to OneSync supports up to 32, right? I read somewhere that it's free for testing purposes.\n\nEDIT: Just to summarise, I assume there's no way to have OneSync disabled and exceed the 32 player limit? Regardless of what route you take as a server owner, you have to pay to get more player slots?\n\nYou've been a great help by the way, I really appreciate it because there's surprisingly little out there for the questions I have.\n\nEDIT 2: For anyone that stumbles onto this in the future, OneSync gives you 48 player slot support for free, not 32.", "63" ], [ "I think their story alone makes both their albums worth listening to at least once for those that haven't but like DOOM, it's like lesser known golden age history. You could listen to Mr <PERSON> all the way through for the first time with its easy lyrics and consciousness/hints of religion, and you wouldn't imagine* just two years later the youngest member got addicted to drugs, (allegedly) talked about blowing up train stations then died running across a highway for reasons nobody could explain.", "788" ], [ "The Wiki page kept on changing drastically. I wish I had a screenshot but at some point it was edited to have this under the death section:\n\n > His cause of death has not been publicly announced, however it is highly speculated that his death was from a heart attack that occurred after witnessing a llama eating a cat.[58]\n\nI only have that because I pasted it to a Discord, it's gone now but maybe it's somewhere in the edit logs.", "288" ], [ "Have you ever checked KMD? It was his group before his DOOM persona, from the early 90s. I knew of KMD before DOOM and, without trying to upset any hardcore DOOM fans, it's such a night and day difference knowing that he went from a young poet to a more messy niche rapper.\n\nIf you're not into listening to a whole album Peachfuzz is their best known song.", "464" ] ]
179
[ 20374, 7070, 11569, 10839, 18461, 3468, 11494, 16114, 4681, 20310, 11815, 110, 16476, 21328, 1214, 10859, 12988, 6280, 25198, 14906, 16194, 15926, 22760, 1452, 17865, 15065, 24031, 21252, 879, 15129, 5777, 24787, 204, 9537, 12660, 2942, 7229, 13390, 16551, 23290, 2100, 7970, 2339, 13957, 10344, 2217, 17261, 16267, 12300, 738, 4952, 21189, 8364, 24241, 17432, 742, 12251, 5553, 9551, 14603, 450, 16115, 7653, 24719, 18291, 12561, 7191, 10094, 11203, 10455, 4563, 16752, 25342, 24564, 11752, 4366, 11422, 23086, 2619, 1641, 11461, 20268, 15708, 9740, 10175, 733, 5469, 3216, 23588, 20493, 17993, 15918, 9881, 11430, 4550, 23380, 13206, 20904, 17058, 21626, 20668, 8811, 1248, 22087, 12391, 11679, 4663, 11265, 6652, 1460, 10047, 6482, 7567, 5552, 8247, 1963, 7723, 12554, 19707, 8706, 5928, 23360, 23227, 1920, 8629, 9687, 9664, 1183, 19482, 6601, 13821, 18008, 15210, 19999, 21985, 11258, 11187, 15504, 18094, 804, 25468, 2158, 37, 7022, 337, 17005, 8731, 15271, 23300, 4098, 21175, 25069, 13788, 16711, 14802, 5468, 12821, 7173, 14481, 9929, 5357, 9585, 12017, 8424, 4507, 20278, 4302, 2039, 19861, 12443, 22394, 19827, 849, 7663, 3387, 25446, 9813, 2738, 13653, 17296, 1810, 3817, 10435, 14432, 14512, 21864, 7251, 3846, 7185, 2135, 6592, 8066, 22820, 12132, 2400, 14535, 3117, 5093, 23898, 14823, 7975, 2927, 17720, 6553, 17998, 16923, 18047, 13218, 13867, 16708, 12578, 14963, 17078, 16255, 4843, 9361, 15213, 12231, 18155, 12680, 3809, 17303, 231, 1178, 6167, 2210, 7016, 8403, 22608, 22953, 22000, 10247, 3435, 1803, 9344, 11352, 23268, 21723, 1569, 12628, 7498, 12892, 3251, 3712, 18951, 12860, 10470, 7930, 19513, 4782, 10162, 854, 5325, 8878, 23616, 20312, 8900, 22117, 2304, 793, 21938, 19647, 7204, 6962, 11534, 9296, 6058, 15055, 3191, 2394, 23091, 3648, 9920, 5337, 2149, 19380, 9936, 19855, 25483, 2843, 25136, 20828, 5471, 24041, 5221, 409, 9982, 24357, 20467, 19880, 18312, 12072, 6045, 13611, 16673, 24400, 16666, 16403, 15223, 24826, 15207, 18226, 4812, 24074, 16615, 9082, 1968, 8608, 7163, 6930, 20257, 1343, 10074, 19197, 3805, 22985, 14348, 15478, 13279, 13074, 24497, 18516, 21434, 19792, 18705, 9372, 1226, 9596, 8980, 10519, 22967, 25438, 197, 5405, 14801, 2970, 24528, 19602, 9762, 25490, 3956, 8920, 8277, 24540, 24868, 883, 24679, 11839, 8821, 830, 18604, 24332, 15985, 582, 16370, 6969, 15111, 9684, 19293, 2300, 20898, 19676, 5846, 13731, 10251, 1283, 12991, 10123, 433, 14118, 7358, 8208, 292, 256, 21640, 6500, 988, 327, 3515, 10151, 19926, 6656, 12028, 617, 1789, 13923, 10842, 14519, 4262, 14957, 16425, 24615, 22656, 153, 14433, 3268, 4818, 21525, 2555, 692, 1427, 18137, 3310, 7551, 1550, 21615, 19958, 7352, 6654, 8418, 14258, 2825, 13833, 17406, 12165, 25440, 9494, 3579, 23353, 5719, 14858, 11123, 23222, 22883, 19453, 19846, 24834, 24627, 6443, 8532, 23583, 10620, 3616, 2410, 12399, 4838, 4731, 12681, 2086, 25266, 9118, 13869, 8645, 5251, 14820, 10805, 21405, 21295, 10536, 3246, 16912, 10705, 24275, 9743, 21951, 23352, 1124, 21467, 13287, 8624, 13302, 2370, 8110, 10150, 13734, 12040, 9360, 7864, 12333, 23297, 11813, 15184, 9849, 21448, 1136, 12531, 12465, 11866, 13865, 6336, 9631, 10509, 4076, 16415, 11507, 17594, 17340, 3433, 4218, 6921, 6108, 9138, 5565, 729, 13262, 20510, 8796, 12077, 22876 ]
reddit_dump_-eimaj-
[ [ "Oh god. Is this seriously the point you wanna make?! lol\n\nYou said (and I quote) \"besides his personality, he has top-tier equipment\" \n\nNow you're throwing equipment, production value and editing out and saying that his vidoes are \"top tier content\" simply because they have PewDiePie in them?! Him being in a video, regardless of how well the editing is or how much effort is put in, instantly makes it \"top tier content\"?! Oh god no. There is no way you're actually about to try and argue this point..lmao\n\n > content is what is provided to the viewers not the effort or production value\n\nSo if we take away all of the editing and equipment (which includes Cameras, computers, editing software, etc) then that would still he considered \"top tier content\" just because PewDiePie is the one who made?!", "919" ], [ "What you're saying is just wrong. I'm sorry but the idea that putting a certain person in a video (with no editing and no equipment whatsoever) would instantly make it a great video is just wrong. You can say that, in your opinion, PewDiePie showing up in a video instantly makes it a great video for you but you used the word \"objectively\" which is so wrong in this context. \n\nAlso, nice little attempt at an insult again lol. You're trying to get a reaction and it ain't working because I'm making valid points that you're just ignoring. \"not everyone is born with a good eye and the perception for these things.\" Okayyyy buddy...\n\nMy original argument was that no one could make the same content and become successful because they're not PewDiePie, and your argument was that his editing is \"top tier\" yet you've now decided to change that and say that his videos are \"top tier\" without any editing or equipment because its him. I understand that you don't want to lose this debate but its getting to the point where you're making statements with the word \"objectively\" in them lol like wtf.", "337" ], [ "Now you're backtracking. The point you just made was that, without any production value whatsoever, PewDiePie's videos would be \"top tier\" simply because he's in them. \n\nYou're also twisting my words. I never, at any point, claimed that using better editing software and having professional editors would result in having \"top tier\" content. Again, my original point was that his videos are only as successful as they are because he is a well established YouTuber. Your point was that the editing is \"top tier.\"\n\nI also like how you didn't address any of what I said in the paragraph above. Youre just gonna ignore what you said about his videos being \"objectively\" \"top tier\" just because he's in them lmao. \n\nLet me make this *very* clear:\n\nA top-tier video (at least in my opinion) isn't one that just gets a lot of views. That is why I said earlier that, if you were to give me a little while, I could go out and gather hundreds of channels with editing that shits on PewDiePie's editing. A top-tier video is one that is well thought out and is *very* well made. Not just some zoom-ins and pictures flying across the screen. Im talking about 'Lemino' level of editing. I thought that should've been quite clear from the beginning but apparently not.", "999" ], [ "Oh god. I dont understand how you can possibly think you're right at this point. The fact that you're honestly trying to argue that PewDiePie \"objectively\" has a \"top-tier\" personality and \"top-tier\" skills is laughable. Its subjective. Look up the definition of subjectivity. \n\nI mean, you just made a comparison between PewDiePie's skills and gravity lmfao. \n\nFirst of all, for being the #1 most subscribed YouTuber, his views aren't as high as you'd expect so Idk how high views (which his aren't in comparison) mean anything in this context. Views dont always equal \"top-tier content.\" If that were the case then what about <PERSON> or <PERSON> or <PERSON>?! Do they make \"top-tier\" content lol.\n\nOh and that comparison to actors aint gonna hold up either. You brought up <PERSON> earlier, right?! Well if you're seriously trying to suggest that putting <PERSON> in a movie immediately means that movie is \"top-tier\" then dont bother. Thats an argument you can't even begin to explain. 'Ad Astra' starred <PERSON> and it was generally regarded by most as one of the most boring movies of last year. Having <PERSON> in the movie didnt exactly do much for that movie. \n\nAt this point it seems that you're just a diehard, biased fanboy.", "192" ], [ "Top-tier: of the *highest* level of rank with regard to quality, reputation or importance. The result of artisanal production techniques that demand rigorous attention to detail\"\n\nBeing number one has nothing to do with the level of quality. He's been around for so long that there were no other channels like his when he started which is why he stood out, not because his editing was out of this world. We're talking about his *content* here not his *persona* lol. This whole argument started about the editing yet you've shifted it to be all about <PERSON>'s \"persona and acting skills\" which is irrelevant when it comes to the quality of his editing. \n\nOkay, I'm now 100% convinced that you're just a biased, immature <PERSON> fanboy/fangirl who can't take a step back and look at things from a different POV. \n\nOh and the example that I brought up has had a successful channel for 8 years so..\n\nAlso, I'm very confident that your master <PERSON> would agree that there ARE so many great artists and creators who are massively underrated and who deserve just as much success as him, if not, more.\n\nfUck oFf:((((((", "999" ], [ "I love these little snarky cop-out replies you keep coming up with like \"oOh u JeAloUs\" \n\nLike, I've tried to have a real discussion about an interesting topic but you keep throwing out these little, petty, immature remarks as if im meant to fall to the floor in complete pain and admit you're right lol.\n\n<PERSON> has a lot of money which everyone, yourself included, wouldn't say no to. As far as everything else, I'm fine. I'm not in love with his wife, I dont share the same interests as him and I dont desire to live in Brighton. I'm happy being me, but you can keep saying \"yOurE sO JeAlOus BrOooOo\" it just proves my point more and more.", "98" ], [ "Right now, we don't know if the Island will be available in free-roam. Rockstar insiders have given us reasons to doubt that it'll be in free-roam and Rockstar themselves haven't mentioned free-roam being available. It'll most likely just be part of the new heist missions but who knows. The island doesn't appear to be massive from the comparisons that have been made between the Los Santos map and the image we have of the new Island. Should still be a fun update, regardless.", "422" ], [ "Yeh like I can't tell if the character is meant to be this irritating and maybe he'll get better eventually? <PERSON> was like this when <PERSON> first joined the show. Everyone hated him and couldn't understand why he was so irritating but he's grown on most viewers at this point. Most recastings are weird at first but eventually the audience gets used to it. \n\nI think the issue with the new <PERSON> is that he rarely ever gets any screen time and when he does its always him being a piece of shit. Sleeping with <PERSON> (who was in a relationship at the time), demanding cash from <PERSON>, being Jealous of <PERSON>'s mental illness, threatening <PERSON> and now it looks like he's gonna start an affair with <PERSON>.", "513" ], [ "Locked <PERSON> in the boot of his car and tormented her for hours on end by making her think he was gonna blow the car up with her in it. \n\nHad <PERSON> thrown in prison for attempted murder (which <PERSON> did to himself).\n\nTried to rape <PERSON>.\n\nBeat up <PERSON> for being gay and being interested in <PERSON>.\n\n(Potentially) Killed someone who he also tormented when they were kids. He framed the guy (<PERSON>) for his attempted murder (because <PERSON> got a confession that it wasn't <PERSON>) and the last scene we saw of <PERSON> was <PERSON> hanging him over a huge dam.", "486" ], [ "I thought so too. I was convinced for a while that they would bring back his feud with the <PERSON> and it would end up being his exit storyline but they haven't shown any signs of that happening. They've continued to go further down this path of <PERSON>. I like the actor a lot and I like the idea of him being a family man but the error in continuity is so annoying.\n\nHe shouldn't be able to go from happily watching <PERSON> rot in prison for months and attempting to rape <PERSON>, to starting a family with <PERSON> and having cozy nights under the duvet. Its ridiculous.", "513" ], [ "Its been almost a year since Coronavirus was first detected and people still need to be reminded of the purpose of the masks. Fucking hell, how can people honestly be so dumb. \n\nWhether you're in great health or not, you should always wear a mask to protect the next person because once you get it and pass it onto the next guy, he then goes and does the same. Pretty simple concept.", "855" ], [ "From _URL_0_: \n\nIf you use a surrogate, they will be the child’s legal parent at birth.\nIf the surrogate is married or in a civil partnership, their spouse or civil partner will be the child’s second parent at birth, unless they did not give their permission.\nLegal parenthood can be transferred by parental order or *adoption* after the child is born.\nIf there is disagreement about who the child’s legal parents should be, the courts will make a decision based on the best interests of the child.", "843" ], [ "Yup, and the things is that people in this sub will say \"well you shouldn't have gotten your hopes up\" or \"it's your fault for making a big deal out of it\" but it's pretty difficult to not get hyped up when the cast are constantly saying things like \"I can't wait to see y'all's reaction\" and \"I got to work with an actor who I always wanted to work with.\"\n\nIt just annoys me that people around here act dumbfounded as to how fans could get their hopes up. I dont mind being disappointed but I'd like to not be treated like a dumbass for actually believing what the cast are telling me.", "522" ], [ "Fantastic Four is coming in 2023 and we know that Marvel loves to lay the groundwork. I mean, there have already been F4 easter eggs in the past.\n\nIn episode 4, they mentioned astronauts who went missing and they've been teasing an aerospace engineer \"who would be up to the challenge\" *cough cough* <PERSON> *cough cough* (Dont worry, I know it won't be him..you can delete that aggressive reply lol). \n\nI don't think Fantastic Four connections would be surprising at all at this point. X-Men, on the other hand, is way too soon. There will be mutants dropped here and there but none of the major ones like <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, etc. That's 3 years away at bare minimum.", "567" ], [ "Yes and my point is that it easily *could* have been <PERSON>. You said \"NOW\" as if Fantastic Four are so far away. We're already in the 3rd month of 2021 and that F4 movie drops in 2023. Marvel loves to drop hints and make connections early so it's not impossible for <PERSON> to make a quick appearance a few years before his movie. \n\nI think we both agree that X-Men is way too soon. Fantastic Four, however, could easily be brought in now. Their movie is like 2 years away and it's not like Marvel hasn't done that before. \n\n<PERSON> showed up in 2016 then got his own movie in 2018 and <PERSON> showed up in 2016 then got his movie over a year later. \n\nI'm not saying it's likely but this idea that Marvel wouldn't introduce <PERSON> this early has nothing to back it up other than people saying \"I dont think <PERSON> would do that\" which is dumb since he's proven that he likes to throw the audience through a loop.", "934" ], [ "Ideas?!! Oh of course. I think you're underestimating <PERSON>'s patience though. The reason why he's successful is because he doesn't rush these things. Gaining access to those properties and starting development on them right away is something DC would do. <PERSON> knows better. I believe the official discussions started relatively recently. There were some fun ideas being thrown around before but not \"this is what we're going to do\" kind of talk.", "7" ], [ "We didn't know it was in development. Marvel announced F4 last year but there's been radio silence about X-Men. They name dropped \"mutants\" at comic con 2019 but this is the first we've heard of active development on an X-Men project happening. \n\nThis means they're currently developing it. Not just having \"what if\" conversations. Like, deciding which characters, a time frame for it, what story they want to adapt, etc.", "422" ], [ "I really liked the episode but I'd be lying if I said it didn't feel quite generic and safe. There was a big CGI battle and the dead character (Vision) was brought back. I just feel like we've seen this so many times before. It was like they ticked off all the boxes. I mean, there was a fuckin skybeam lol.\n\nI am happy that the leaks were so wrong but Idk I guess I expected a different ending because WandaVision seemed so different. It wasn't your cliche comic book show. It was dark and disturbing but the ending was all bright, epic and empowering.", "735" ], [ "Yes we know that *now* but before we didn't. People like <PERSON>, DanielRPK, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, etc were all absolutely convinced these things would happen. You're acting like it was obvious that <PERSON> was playing a random. Now that we've seen the episode it's easy to take the high ground and laugh at people for believing certain theories.", "311" ], [ "Sure but saying \"told yall\" and \"you couldn't think for one second\" sounds like you're treating people like idiots for believing this stuff. \n\nThis wasn't a random rumour started by <PERSON>. This was all coming from people who got a ton of stuff right. There's a reason most people in this sub believed <PERSON> and <PERSON>. They built up a reputation. When they say something is \"100%\" gonna happen, it convinces a lot of people since they're never really wrong. \n\nI was open to them being wrong but I didn't except them to be since they have such a strong reputation (or I guess had..lol)", "969" ], [ "The things is, people are going to completely ignore this when they shouldn't. Sure he's gotten lots of things right but no one ever brings up the times when these guys are wrong. It's like they only count the wins and not the losses. He didn't just say \"I heard Doctor Strange might show up.\" He said it was 100% going to happen. He wouldn't back off of it. \n\nPeople are \"crucifying him\" because he's always held to such a high standard. Everyone always acts like he never gets anything wrong but this is proof that he does.\n\nNo matter how much he's gotten right, this will always be something he got wrong. No point in hiding it.", "936" ], [ "This is possible though unlikely. The leak I kept hearing was that <PERSON> shows up 28m in. If that was true then there's no way covid is responsible. They wouldn't cut him out if he had a significant role. If it was just a tiny 5 second cameo appearance then sure, they could've said \"meh, we don't need it\" and went forward.\n\nAlthough, people are speculating that the last scene was filmed while they were shooting Multiverse Of Madness since the camera movements look a lot like <PERSON> style. If this is true then I don't get why they couldn't have just filmed <PERSON>'s cameo on that set and set it over to WandaVision. They've done that several times in the past.", "192" ], [ "Also, the actors hyping it up hasn't exactly been great either. \n\n<PERSON> says she can't wait to see our reactions when we find out who the aerospace engineer is and it ends up just being a random <PERSON> who shows up at the very end\n\n<PERSON> says he got to work with an actor he has always wanted to work with and it ends up being himself (okay this one is pretty funny but also annoying at the same time)\n\n<PERSON> says there's a cameo she's \"surprised hasn't leaked yet\" which was probably <PERSON>, even though the <PERSON> appearance was leaked all over Twitter in the week leading up to the episode.\n\nLike, I get that it's their job to hype the show up but I'd really appreciate it if Marvel uses this as a learning experience and tells <PERSON> and <PERSON> to be careful with what they say. It's led to a lot of disappointment with WandaVision.\n\nOh wait but that's somehow our faults?!! <PERSON>", "311" ], [ "Don't give him a pass just because he's normally right. I'm so sick of people only counting the wins and not the losses. If he was wrong then remember that for next time. Don't let him forget it. \n\nI'll only give him a pass if <PERSON> (or someone else at Marvel) comes out and says that <PERSON> *was* going to be in the finale but covid messed up their plans..or any other reason. <PERSON> said it was 100% going to happen and it didn't. There has to be an explanation or he's full of shit.", "806" ], [ "It's pretty difficult when you have someone, who's almost always right, who says \"100%. I'm not backing down from this\" about a popular rumour. Not a crazy rumour either. Strange showing up made complete sense on so many levels.\n\nI didnt take it as 100% confirmation but I very much expected it to happen.\n\nAt least I know now that he isn't as safe of a bet as people made him out to be. Hopefully this has been a great learning experience for a lot of us.", "969" ], [ "Believing a fairytale your parents tell you is completely different from believing a popular rumour that comes from someone who has proven he is *very* reliable. Obviously no one should take it as confirmation but I find it funny how people like you are now acting dumbfounded as to how anyone could believe the leakers. They had an incredible track record and some of the rumours made complete sense. No shit people were gonna believe them.", "969" ], [ "It's a little more than just a fancast since <PERSON> reportedly met with Marvel to talk about it and then, on the exact same day, got on his YouTube channel and made a little tease. \n\n*Shows fan art* \n\n\"Well I guess I better appreciate this as its the closest I'll ever get to playing a comic book hero\" \n\n*smiles and tilts head while staring directly at the camera*\n\nIt could be a coincidence but he knows everyone wants him to play <PERSON> since he's been asked several times and has said he would love to do it. \n\nAlso, Marvel comics made <PERSON> look exactly like <PERSON> and that's the way that <PERSON> got the role of <PERSON>.", "463" ], [ "We've seen that same shot of him high-fiving the guy on the super bowl field so many times lol. \n\nTbh, It's probably just Marvel not wanting us to know that he has a bigger role. I think they want us to see him as a villain who won't be around for very long but he'll end up being a good guy and he'll stick around until the end of the show. Just a thought.", "936" ], [ "Dumb, sure. It wouldn't be shocking at all though. I don't even think this is gonna be called 'Deadpool 3' since they likely want audiences to know that this one takes place within the MCU unlike the others which loosely take place in the Foxverse. I doubt <PERSON> will return too. He worked out like crazy for DP2 and, by the time they start shooting DP3, It will have been like 5 years since they shot DP2 so he's 5 years older now. Idk if that workout is as appealing when you're nearing your mid fifties.", "417" ], [ "True but I'm not talking a year or two. Let's say <PERSON> does season 1 of Moon Knight and then does an MCU movie. He's a very busy actor so it's unlikely that they're gonna be shooting season 2 right after. He'll likely do a bunch of indie projects and then Moon Knight season 2 will show up 3 or 4 years later. I get that these aren't like most shows but it's still weird to have that much of break inbetween seasons.", "567" ], [ "I'm not saying there's a \"issue\" but I'm just pointing out how weird it is to have 3 or 4 years in between seasons. <PERSON> isn't desperate for work. He has a ton of projects coming out just this year. Moon Knight will likely do a season or two and then tie into a movie. The movie will take time to film and then they have to wait for it to release. Most shows don't have a huge gap in between seasons, that's all I'm sayin...", "116" ], [ "I never said we wouldn't lmfao. I'd love for you to find a quote where I said that.\n\nAll I was saying is that TV shows and Movies are different. There's usually a gap in between movie sequels. TV shows usually start working on the next season right after the first one has aired. I would love for you to find me 10 TV shows that had their first season and then started working on the next season 2 and a half - 3 years later. It's not normal and I was just curious as to how Marvel Studios planned on working it out.", "567" ], [ "The whole point of my comment was that it's weird to have season 1 of a show then 3 or 4 years later pickup where they left off. A movie is different. That's a complete story. A TV show is a continuous story that is being told from season to season. The idea that a TV show would go from season 1 in 2022 to season 2 in 2028 is absolutely ridiculous lmao. That was the whole point of my comment. Look, I get it. You don't want to be wrong. That's fine. I'm just pointing out the fact that having 6 years in between seasons isn't normal. \n\nAgain, find me 10 TV shows that have done the same. You keep saying \"Marvel is different\" but that's just an excuse. Why would anyone have over half a decade in between seasons of a TV show?? It's absurd. A movie works because a movie is a complete story. A season of a show is part of a long-running journey.", "116" ], [ "> because it's Marvel.\n\nOkay, look, you don't seem to be understanding me so I'm going to leave it here.\n\nA TV show isn't a movie. A movie is a complete story. A season of a TV show is part of the overall journey. Compare season 4 of Breaking Bad to Doctor Strange. Doctor Strange was a complete story so they were able to have 6 years in between the two movies. Breaking Bad was an ongoing story so they didn't have a massive 6 year jump in between seasons. \n\nAgain, you want to be right and I get that. Still, there's no way you're going to convince me that movies and TV shows are the same.\n\n<PERSON> will have so many supporting characters and ongoing storylines. Do you think they're all gonna come over to the movies with him?! Oh no wait, they're gonna wait 6 years and then bring the cast and all the storylines back, right?! Ridiculous. Know when you're beat.\n\nYou can keep pulling this \"We're going full circle\" trick if you want but it's just a poor excuse 🤷‍♂️", "367" ], [ "At first I believed it but then it became all information that we either already knew or at had at least speculated about. \n\nWe *know* Fantastic Four is looking for writers\n\nWe *know* Antman 3 is going to be a larger scale family movie\n\nWe *know* Guardians 3 isn't casting right now\n\nThen there's just so many fan theories and speculation being thrown in like <PERSON> and <PERSON> being considered for future roles, <PERSON> being a whacky fun show, <PERSON> returning, <PERSON> being super dark, etc. \n\nPlease stop linking 4chan posts.", "417" ], [ "You're absolutely right. I just wanna know why since it makes no sense on so many levels. I like the idea of not saying anything at all and showing her that she can't just click her fingers and have me come running, but the idea of never finding out why is horrible. I'll never get back with her and I intend on sticking with no contact but this has left me so surprised. It's the last thing I thought would happen today. \n\nAnyways, thanks for your comment :)", "432" ], [ "That's possible but it just seems weird to do that after 3 years. Based on the way things ended, I can't see us being good friends. I was shocked that contacted me at this point. She dumped me before and then I (stupidly) got back with her so I think it's a repeat of that situation.\n\nMy guess is that she hasn't had a boyfriend for a bit and is thinking \"He'll definitely date me again\" since it was easy for her to click her fingers and make me come running last time. \n\nWe weren't together long enough for me to make that much of a lasting impression so I can't think of any reason as to why she would want to be my friend now lol. I blocked her anyways so it's all good. Thanks for your comment :)", "432" ] ]
341
[ 18321, 8319, 3278, 22718, 4876, 19250, 1625, 1591, 9596, 11786, 10597, 2480, 25425, 6984, 22273, 21174, 13528, 3205, 13655, 2055, 1981, 3638, 23420, 21434, 7807, 8652, 4420, 12988, 19951, 11018, 1891, 11458, 11181, 10848, 17277, 12018, 9775, 20234, 24331, 10162, 16950, 18350, 13973, 12015, 22856, 8403, 14802, 15375, 4851, 2117, 7180, 24587, 16091, 20882, 9373, 1968, 3863, 12258, 13687, 12467, 4020, 20927, 6738, 23216, 13228, 10151, 18094, 11688, 3370, 14882, 1882, 22917, 12426, 8071, 7593, 23754, 21190, 14568, 2300, 4970, 18877, 4813, 8165, 3009, 10301, 11660, 2296, 11661, 17408, 11760, 19643, 14522, 17415, 4663, 4023, 14010, 6272, 1829, 1723, 2356, 6718, 9609, 20157, 2166, 13912, 23779, 9042, 22613, 8600, 3122, 5862, 4048, 11908, 7897, 10982, 23989, 21045, 9070, 6286, 5028, 21079, 3110, 3029, 15730, 16914, 6277, 7184, 23414, 12404, 915, 4133, 411, 1313, 21337, 15946, 3715, 10370, 2743, 2137, 19741, 19561, 6415, 15274, 13838, 20460, 12794, 17284, 5398, 2935, 7710, 22924, 15668, 3967, 15927, 23227, 4844, 1757, 6669, 5814, 15655, 6574, 13926, 13487, 8593, 9233, 10672, 25265, 25343, 15363, 15849, 3484, 7165, 2085, 752, 18535, 17103, 25328, 16899, 23525, 3911, 19785, 8884, 24248, 15642, 13891, 2918, 3997, 20801, 397, 24686, 2934, 11779, 18631, 13445, 8619, 22068, 2249, 21798, 18158, 6539, 14691, 2998, 23388, 7461, 9627, 13724, 18263, 5803, 18914, 11725, 4214, 10483, 6092, 8683, 14935, 2113, 23163, 2628, 17847, 13142, 17342, 6280, 11134, 9050, 1332, 19446, 14818, 210, 18887, 12978, 1343, 6654, 24693, 5162, 4890, 5375, 16697, 6335, 12168, 4594, 25299, 6736, 372, 20828, 19975, 8772, 20668, 6214, 22034, 22442, 20459, 24473, 9304, 3877, 2738, 16727, 14535, 10705, 11348, 17863, 4850, 18215, 24909, 10898, 25166, 1358, 20124, 3002, 5553, 798, 23165, 15922, 17214, 851, 21325, 14460, 20496, 1824, 1803, 792, 1706, 2404, 468, 15413, 21239, 4894, 8698, 9403, 23687, 17389, 8257, 24288, 23159, 10063, 22814, 6041, 2607, 10608, 14164, 16001, 12264, 24885, 12017, 23977, 7629, 131, 8105, 7516, 25268, 14087, 5095, 19094, 1413, 1371, 12283, 22907, 19926, 20205, 17671, 24247, 21270, 21316, 19602, 6293, 2299, 2924, 25266, 24077, 2573, 21089, 4454, 13311, 16212, 6311, 5216, 25069, 19050, 12294, 18727, 6095, 7191, 1471, 2108, 1411, 14011, 20895, 7259, 3735, 14131, 18717, 3861, 2642, 22884, 13358, 19234, 14080, 12205, 17643, 14922, 12821, 4063, 4783, 16275, 5076, 19467, 10765, 20603, 14046, 6291, 1452, 8012, 20309, 3687, 9118, 6507, 9724, 16786, 20356, 20, 12245, 17097, 14949, 3907, 3785, 1683, 14885, 18604, 10183, 24390, 21723, 21038, 14947, 21590, 4, 22983, 6206, 11805, 6470, 15482, 20996, 19348, 11723, 14610, 2045, 408, 8620, 21944, 16514, 21457, 5974, 5821, 22071, 5905, 12460, 5507, 9321, 20694, 3141, 11902, 5329, 2692, 7006, 18994, 10726, 21700, 3824, 499, 12470, 7995, 25269, 4626, 18267, 9967, 24313, 21121, 11915, 7275, 3802, 2005, 9454, 3298, 20581, 2846, 10460, 10502, 9085, 16309, 7645, 575, 22852, 19507, 1941, 4616, 17261, 3928, 24228, 20098, 15041, 21588, 10074, 15847, 12649, 3762, 7543, 13685, 1237, 19915, 8732, 21617, 17538, 15653, 3314, 19019, 23579, 1454, 9944, 24487, 8151, 14663, 14400, 19740, 6058, 7900, 4120, 13262, 5572, 441, 2340, 6734, 5552, 6477, 2285, 18059, 11714, 4646, 8628, 1934, 19437, 10972 ]
reddit_dump_-im-losing-it-
[ [ "When I was about 7-8 years old, me and my sister (11-12 years old) where helping my dad with some small tasks during the reconstruction of our house. At some point we were holding a door straight up so my dad could put it in the doorframe. Suddenly I get the feeling that it gets more difficult to hold the door up when I hear a loud smack. My sister had fallen backwards and smacked her head against the wall. She kind of slipped collapsed onto the floor. Non responsive. Afterwards it became clear she just fainted for some reason. Me not being familiar with 'fainting' at that time, I was convinced she died. I completely zoomed out, total chaos inside my head. My dad was tapping her cheecks and yelling her name, when he noticed. Which was quite fast since I'd let the door fall onto the ground. I just went to my room, while crying, not knowing what to do. After a minute or so she was conscious again, but I swear, it seemed like an eternity had passed between those moments.", "875" ], [ "Want a picture taken of yourself, ask another tourist with a big camera, he or she mostly knows how to take a good picture. Preferable one you can outrun, if they want to steal your phone/camera\n\nAlso bring your online-banking-machine thing with you. If there is a problem with your bankcard/limits/big money transfer,. it can almost always be solved with online banking (sometimes with assistance of your bank) but not many people put it on their list with 'stuff to but in the lugage'", "949" ], [ "Basically, after going to another school, when I would propose to meet, he would always say 'yeah sounds good, let's go swimming' I hated swimming and would propose something else but he would insist to go swimming. Eventually I would just make up excuses for why I could'nt go swimming and after a while both of us stopped asking to meet up.\n\nReally stupid reason when I look back at it", "413" ], [ "As a kid my grandma bought me and my sister this toy. I'll do my best to describe it:\n\nA transparant plastic roll/sausage like thing, which was double layered so in the middle of this roll there was a hole (in the length). The roll was filled with blue water/gell and small fishes. You could kind off squeeze it.\n\nAt first we just played with it. Since it was summer we figured out to put it in the fridge and cool ourselves with it after it got cold. Then put it back in etc (I know, good use of the toy) \n\nThe next step was me deciding to cool the inside of my mouth with the toy, and then I thought, you know what.. I should squeeze it with my teeth!\n\nThe thing exploded, and all the gell/water went straight down my throath since I was laying down. Luckily I didn't choke on the fishes.\n\nMy mom got so mad that she took some scissors and destroyed my sisters toy to prevent further accidents.\n\nMy mom called the doctors but they said it should be fine or something, but I went to bed thinking I wasn't going to wake up the next morning...\n\nWas really releaved the next morning, jumped out of bed, ran to my parents room yelling ''I'm still alive''", "630" ], [ "I don't think anyone can be truely satisfied. Everthing we experience won't feel the same the second time. For example, everytime you drink caffeïne you need x times more the next time for the same experience. My opinion is that this is applicable to everything in life, just different ratio's. We take more to get satisfied, leaving us crave for more to get once again satisfied, an endless circle. People are often happier when almost reaching their goal than really reaching it, for example people who become rich and don't know what to do next to get the same 'high'. \n\nMy advice, accepting that you won't be satisfied, never, there will always be a certain void craving for more. Don't be sad about it, just accept it being there, traveling along with you", "4" ], [ "A friend and I going to a town in The Netherlands for a school-project (+5h driving from where I live: Belgium). Making a stop in Amsterdam to eat (somewhat half-way the trip). It was about 21h30 when we returned to the 'secured' car park. All car windows smashed, laptops and bags stolen. After looking for a police office that would help us (they wouldn't let us in, because it wasn't an emergency and we would have to wait till the next morning) we decided to return home. 2+ hour drive at 1am during the winter with all windows smashed. Real wild, fun times.", "449" ], [ "Not me, but my dad had a severe car accident when he was about 20 years old. He smashed into a car that was parked behind a turn. The passanger side was destroyed. But he survived. He isn't a religious person or supersticious. But he has always said he saw his life flash before his eyes. It was like a movie playing. A continious flow of fragments of himself througout his life. It was not from his own perspective, but he was spectating himself.", "449" ], [ "It's in our dna. Stories used to be told to learn and adapt. Example a hunter managed to kill a large animal when he got attacked, the tribe made a hero-story about it and told it to the next generations so they also could learn how to survive in/handle such events. Storytelling enabled people to create an advantage in otherwise ''new'' situations. People who didn't participate in storytelling, didn't learn from mistakes (from others) or new discoveries and were eliminated. Only the storytellers survived or had a better chance of survival\n\nSomething along those lines, I've picked up somewhere", "931" ], [ "Working as intern in a bank. I was the first person people came to when they had questions, wanted to do transactions,..basically anything they didn't need an apointment for.\n\nIt was my first day, fist client is a sketchy looking guy, 40 - 50 years old. Wanted to move money from different accounts to others and then back again to other accounts so there would be a rounded number on his balance of some of his accounts. Had to calculate all of the amounts that had to be transfered, didn't know the computersystem at all at that time so it took me a while. \n\nOff course this guy becomes impatient but eventually everything is done and he leaves.\n\nTwo days later, right before closing time (only people with appointments could come then). This guy walks back in, there was no one else, and is overly polite.\n\nHe comes to me and start explaining extremely polite that i fucked up his transcations (afterwards it became clear I didn't) and then he laughs and tells me not to worry because he had a little suprise for me and he taps this plastic bag he's carrying. \n\nHis mood changed and he started claiming he was Israeli CIA or something and that I would regret messing up his transactions\n\nNoped the fuck out of there...\nReally feared for my lifex expecting him to pull out a gun.\n\nI told him he was right and that I would get a manager to make sure he got help right away.\n\nManager decided not to call the cops but just ask him what needed to be done (concerning the transactions) and let him leave. The guy also claimed that he had access to all of our security footage and that should be fired. \n\nI feel like I escaped something there by leaving the confrontation.\n\nWorked there for six months and almost every day some crazy shit happened there\n\nEdit: I know that guy was talking complete bullshit, but the fact that he was clearly mentally unstable, really not in his right mind, was the scariest part", "428" ], [ "Reminds me of a story involving my sister.\nWhen she was 6-8 years old, she was in her room making a huge puzzle. When it became evening my parents went upstairs and thought it would be funny to make my sister crazy. They acted like she had spent the whole night making that puzzle. The acted (fake) angry like 'what? You've been up all night while you have to go to school in a bit'?? My sister believed the sun going down was the sun rising in the morning and she just panicked and started crying.", "630" ], [ "If can get away safely, run.\n\nIf you can't get away, hide. \n\nThen run away when you can.\n\nIf you can't hide, fight.\n\nWhen confronting the shooter look them in the eyes, always heard it's more diffucult to shoot someone while looking them in the eyes.\n\nAlso try running when they reload, this should give you a better chance I guess", "500" ], [ "The Medal for War Welfare was donated on 17 September 1915 by Grand Duke <PERSON> of Hesse and was intended for award to persons who had made a special contribution to the field of warfare during the First World War. The round medal made of bronze shows the monogram E L E (Ernst Ludwig Eleonore). The Hessian Grand Duchy's crown can be seen above. On the reverse, surrounded by a narrow laurel wreath, the three-line inscription For War Welfare. The award was worn on a red ribbon or on a women's bow with wide white side stripes on the left chest. As of June 27, 1916, the awarding of the honor for war care only to women who did not meet the conditions for a ceremony of the military medical cross.\n\nDarmstadt is located in Hesse\n\n_URL_0_", "749" ], [ "Create the habbit of taking notice of escape routes, things that could give you cover, places where you are exposed.\n\nDo this whenever you enter a new location.\nMake a short scenario in your head where to go to en what to do when shit gets real.\n\nYou'l know what to do when bad stuff happens. Not the kind of stuff that's easy to figure out when there is a shooter in the building for example.\n\nBe prepared", "306" ] ]
365
[ 9871, 17350, 21017, 7726, 4295, 7884, 5417, 5541, 7005, 12792, 25045, 6190, 5832, 2964, 12398, 25500, 7854, 1746, 17317, 8065, 3976, 21181, 5112, 5771, 11377, 293, 22840, 1127, 14980, 8011, 25291, 19180, 19791, 15512, 8205, 25406, 1049, 14762, 23833, 8130, 20655, 19833, 13096, 5883, 18262, 12246, 2987, 21887, 717, 5849, 19917, 14974, 11276, 22806, 23050, 2456, 5785, 7377, 5790, 22448, 12335, 9364, 13881, 22746, 1111, 13408, 7215, 978, 5958, 10659, 15619, 1752, 860, 22572, 16631, 3528, 16476, 19536, 2482, 1370, 23461, 2527, 12381, 1645, 7028, 11387, 4637, 21788, 7925, 12464, 7480, 8434, 15997, 6639, 10798, 12370, 22893, 11808, 14029, 12692, 4501, 4473, 7483, 19473, 4520, 15677, 23885, 3552, 9347, 4488, 1904, 2828, 8672, 7631, 13996, 7277, 22799, 13781, 11713, 20276, 14354, 4081, 15010, 9753, 24034, 14752, 5841, 17805, 12390, 9520, 13329, 18531, 17290, 4114, 763, 14767, 24104, 4814, 21101, 7898, 2515, 10750, 9470, 25494, 12440, 12564, 14208, 14619, 22041, 19054, 7301, 1734, 3889, 21039, 12595, 12569, 13859, 4149, 2940, 22487, 24426, 4898, 21417, 7091, 14839, 8142, 412, 10758, 16507, 20134, 18886, 19968, 1533, 944, 5059, 342, 11159, 20367, 24061, 23096, 1765, 22169, 7109, 16677, 9612, 3859, 8566, 4640, 20990, 20592, 25164, 94, 9862, 142, 863, 14934, 13121, 7186, 3387, 4677, 19323, 2068, 19141, 10970, 15813, 7508, 3299, 17201, 1064, 14082, 11477, 14089, 2543, 15988, 23192, 12922, 7507, 5853, 21323, 12653, 5425, 10288, 4260, 18555, 1180, 22619, 9023, 7260, 722, 12594, 5805, 4549, 9796, 9809, 5230, 12436, 296, 20, 18010, 22195, 22395, 25133, 24716, 6009, 6004, 11035, 8723, 19303, 7340, 13513, 10564, 14543, 5811, 18540, 8485, 19306, 9619, 9339, 1365, 10911, 12163, 6792, 13835, 19427, 20443, 724, 3573, 9532, 6419, 12333, 7734, 6308, 21217, 14636, 25362, 12746, 24932, 7261, 12500, 5427, 6972, 23269, 1826, 256, 10020, 17734, 15395, 9667, 6049, 23329, 23138, 11901, 9424, 15220, 5741, 12860, 6426, 10420, 19452, 4718, 22330, 23232, 23799, 10216, 3179, 4456, 20018, 12851, 4798, 4115, 9531, 15648, 19814, 25174, 25023, 13816, 13782, 9947, 9813, 757, 13001, 12866, 17178, 21096, 1766, 18087, 4727, 10729, 21173, 17712, 10562, 2991, 10233, 9812, 3806, 12512, 7517, 2395, 18077, 8847, 22400, 6140, 15030, 5986, 11628, 1191, 17036, 614, 14671, 23920, 6191, 589, 5117, 13067, 22826, 17373, 10845, 20916, 16124, 6636, 17916, 22790, 18732, 13469, 3346, 845, 4252, 20382, 14019, 18114, 11500, 4553, 820, 3114, 13568, 15504, 21331, 1067, 21424, 920, 19202, 8172, 7222, 4492, 10667, 7137, 6962, 10939, 8266, 14131, 10484, 10762, 18694, 5392, 607, 1091, 14250, 10297, 9166, 3216, 1603, 22185, 22868, 7955, 12149, 20936, 7286, 22948, 1401, 1214, 25294, 630, 7026, 19717, 2486, 18150, 24254, 23955, 8307, 12499, 10051, 4138, 10890, 7203, 23044, 152, 11853, 13603, 14704, 8342, 13502, 9682, 6131, 311, 13935, 5537, 15774, 8037, 7424, 1508, 5194, 2956, 4656, 8757, 2613, 20022, 4686, 18169, 19820, 5667, 9376, 10663, 6328, 7698, 5339, 7376, 4881, 9966, 1707, 21109, 3209, 11675, 7367, 8925, 18181, 7085, 5633, 13799, 8152, 12282, 1886, 1155, 11963, 18128, 287, 20666, 18347, 19176, 8549, 1136, 4360, 10648, 5705, 8316, 22824, 21299, 20391, 6758, 320, 19246, 13451, 20538, 16626, 18456, 4028, 18594, 24317, 7612, 13112 ]
reddit_dump_-jjjjjjjjjj-
[ [ "This is just wrong. The org is sustainable, or at least was within reach of sustainability. Scouts don't make their money from dues. They subsist on donations from churches, scout alumni, and government programs. They are going to have to add millions of dues-paying girls to make up for the loss of church and traditional alumni donations. I don't see that happening, especially given that the girl scouts is already a thing and they won't take losing a bunch of members to the boy scouts laying down.", "214" ], [ "I wouldn't call that an attempt to injure another player. It was a dirty play, but it was at least an attempt to break up a basket. Shit like <PERSON>'s tearing <PERSON>'s shoulder out or <PERSON> destroying <PERSON>'s head are attempts to injure. <PERSON>'s hit on <PERSON> was an attempt to injure. \n\nDon't get me wrong, <PERSON> is trash, but people on here are reacting worse to that shove than to the <PERSON> hit. That shove was pretty benign as far as scumbag plays go.", "425" ], [ "It sounds like you weren't watching this or any other game and are just reading the box score. <PERSON> is fucking abysmal. He's a liability on D and he constantly gets rejected by smaller defenders. I've never seen someone as big as him get bullied so hard by a smaller dude in the paint. The Cavs give up 10 points a game on failed <PERSON> post plays because he has absolutely zero talent in the paint. \n\nHe's an overpaid <PERSON>.", "600" ], [ "What are you talking about? You think the fucking team doctor is telling the FO to ask for more in a trade? I guarantee you all the doctors said was that he was hurt, his return timeline would be longer than anticipated and that he might have XYZ complications. A doctor isn't going to comment on whether to trade for the guy or whether to seek more compensation. They just tell you if the dude is healthy enough to play and when he might be healthy enough to play.", "228" ], [ "I think the biggest mistake you didn't mention was taking <PERSON>. I don't know if they didn't think they'd get <PERSON> back or what, but he had no chance on that team once they did and everyone knew it so his trade value was diminished. Taking <PERSON> or <PERSON> (or better yet trading down for more picks) would have given them an option to develop a usable player alongside <PERSON> or at least given them someone they could trade without being fleeced.\n\nThe second biggest mistake was trading <PERSON> for <PERSON>. <PERSON> is terrible. The dude was playing above his ceiling due to insane usage rates and ample garbage time in Minnesota. Expecting that to continue when he was turned into an off-ball pick and pop player was incredibly dumb.", "791" ], [ "Everyone on here talking about the <PERSON> trade being awful, should look at the <PERSON> trade. <PERSON> was forcing his way out and they still got something that looked decent at the time for it. \n\nThe Cavs traded TWO #1 overall picks for a dude that put up good stats with an insane usage rate on a team with no other options and an injury history. There was never any chance of that trade being good, even at the time. Even worse, it saddled the Cavs with a massive terrible contract and continues to destroy any lineup flexibility the Cavs might try because <PERSON> is such a liability in both a fast offense and any defense.", "791" ], [ "They didn't decide to go with just in time. That's just the PR spin. They consciously decided they didn't need to order spares or maintain a supply chain. This is just how they are covering up the reality that they willingly let their military equipment fall into disrepair to be able to keep a balanced budget while spending heavily on Herr <PERSON>'s social programs. This is no different than any government raiding its departments to pay for its dear leader's preferred projects.", "308" ], [ "This is why there will be no peace. You're not dealing with rational people. <PERSON> is a monster, but he's not a fanatic. He has a sense of self-preservation if nothing else. \n\nThe Palestinians would gladly die if it meant killing a Jew. From the time they are born they are taught hate and Islam. Even if Palestine gets a leader that wants peace, the public would never tolerate it. The UN and the Arab League created this situation by creating the narrative that the Palestinians could someday get their land back. Every other territory that's ever been conquered doesn't have this problem because the previous inhabitants are exterminated or beaten down so badly they go somewhere else and resettle.\n\nIf we really want peace, the world should let Israel and Palestine fight it out. Loser gives up their claim and gets the fuck out.", "677" ], [ "You can tell your investors that, but generally they'll negotiate themselves a member or two on the board of directors who will be there to make sure you're not squandering their money by overpaying yourself. You'll also have a hard time raising subsequent funding rounds if it goes around that you're paying yourself a lot.\n\nYou also don't pay yourself stock, at least early on. You already have 100% of the stock when you found the company. You dilute yourself over time by creating more shares to give to investors or employees you can't afford to pay all cash. Investors hate to see the cap table diluted and they will be very unhappy if you just issue yourself a million new shares for every million you sell to them. Share issues also require board approval for almost all corporations.\n\nEven if you did pay yourself tons of stock its worthless unless you've IPO'd, because there's no market to sell the equity. No investor will want to buy the equity of a founder who is jumping ship. Assuming you're a successful startup and you've lasted as CEO, you're probably considered the face of the company. If you leave the company's value disintegrates. No investor would have wanted to touch Facebook if <PERSON> left a few years into FB's life. If you're toxic and have given up enough equity, you'll be forced out ala Uber and at that point you don't generally have much say in what your stock grants look like.\n\nThe true dream if you want to get rich through a startup (and not have to work your ass off forever) is to found a company, get a ton of hype to pump your valuation up to the 8-9 figure range quickly. Then get acquired by Google/Apple/etc. and retire on a beach. Fuck IPOs and fuck whatever piddly salary you could get yourself. As founder/CEO you likely still have double digit percentages of equity meaning you're walking away with a lot of money (just don't forget to negotiate the fact that you don't have to stay on for very long after the acquisition).", "200" ], [ "I go to NYC about once a month. The first few years of Uber were like a golden age compared to NYC cabs. The last few years its been people with shitty cars that are dirty as fuck with no working AC, people who don't speak English, people who don't know where they are going. Its worse service than cabs now. Uber's prices have also gone up to the point where most of the time Uber X is as much or more than a cab. The only benefit Uber still has is that you don't have to fuss with paying.", "114" ], [ "There's nothing special about Snag or these gig-services. Every issue they raised in this article is actually an issue with the independent contractor system being abused. The Snag service actually seems great for people that do just want quick part time gigs. The pay is competitive for those types of positions.\n\nThe issue is that Snag (and every other employer) is able to profit here because they can take what used to be an employee and replace them with an independent contractor that they can save insane amounts of taxes and insurance on.", "479" ], [ "These gig workers are pretty much the definition of independent contractors. No set workplace, no set hours, no direct oversight. Snag gives them a job, they can choose to take it. They show up and work it and leave. I have a number of issues with the independent contractor system pushing employer's costs onto taxpayers, but at the very least these people are being legally classified as independent contractors.", "602" ], [ "They certainly are propagandizing the party governing. <PERSON> might sit in the Oval office, but the establishment has thousands of loyal devotees in all branches of government and represents all but a few of our elected representatives. Look at how many of <PERSON>'s policies have been slowed, halted, or overturned and its clear that <PERSON> is not in charge. He's trying his best, but our government was never designed to be run by one person (which is a good thing). The media is going all-in for the establishment. They know that they can probably ride out 8 years of <PERSON>, but its vital they keep the citizenry compliant so they don't have a <PERSON> 2.0 in 2024.", "826" ], [ "It's offered for two reasons: 1) Its a party-trick that people love to show off and thus is a terrific marketing tool for Tesla (as long as people stop getting killed at least); and 2) Tesla uses its drivers as guinea pigs. They collect all the autopilot data and use it to improve/train their autonomous driving programs.\n\nTesla is getting marketing and R & D value out of offering a shitty beta piece of software, why wouldn't they, other than the fact people keep dying from it?", "49" ], [ "This is literally the biggest bullshit excuse. Think about what you're saying in the context of other crimes: \"if there is punishment for murder, nobody will ever admit they killed someone...\"\n\nThe punishment for making a false report is the deterrent. We don't want them doing it in the first place. The punishment should be the same as the crime you falsely accused someone of. Then you wouldn't need to worry about accusers being scared to recant, because they wouldn't make shit up to begin with.", "12" ], [ "People almost never own up to other crimes they commit, yet we still find them guilty. People this stupid generally aren't smart enough to keep their lies straight and many of them tell their friends or family about what they did. If this was treated like an actual crime and investigated using the powers the police use on things like domestic violence, you'd be able to suss out most of these false accusations with or without a confession.", "12" ], [ "You've clearly not spent much time at your local government's benefits offices. If you really want to you can pull in a lot of welfare using children. Yeah you're not getting rich on it, but if you feed them junk and get free clothes from whatever kid's charities there are and neglect their school supplies, toys, healthcare and everything else you can definitely pull in more than they cost.\n\nGo to any public school in a low-income area and you'll see how tragically common this is.", "683" ], [ "Its unsurprising. Kids aren't the focus of relationships anymore. Young people are more \"selfish\" in that they want to pursue their own interests, not pop out a baby to be the focus of their life.\n\nBesides that, student loans and housing prices are very high compared to 30 years ago. But, the biggest economic issue is that spending power has been crippled. Decades of near stagnant wages coupled with the virtual elimination of benefits such as pensions. Adjusted for inflation my dad made as much with a 4 year degree as I do with a graduate degree in the same field at the same point in his career. Except he got full health insurance with no deductible or co-pay and was eligible for a pension.\n\nI pay $1,000/month for my and my wife's health insurance (which is pretty good) after my employer covers their share, but we have a $6,000 deductible. I also have no pension and have a 401k plan instead. So basically I make the same money as him, except I also have to pay for healthcare and retirement savings. In reality my earning power is almost 50% less than his was.", "954" ], [ "The biggest problem with the sequels, besides the SJW BS, is that there isn't a single new idea. It's literally the same story being retold for a third time. It feels so mind-numbingly bad because the first six Star Wars installments essentially told the story of the rise of the jedi and their fall and then rising again after the one who fell to the dark side saw the error of his ways. Yet after all of that, the galaxy just immediately fell apart again. Empire took back over easily. New Dark side people show up. Its Sisyphean to the audience. You just feel like you've seen this same shit before and you can't believe its happening again. Its the worst writing I've ever seen in any media.", "946" ], [ "Its not that the costs have gone up (generally all costs go up over time), but that compensation has not kept pace. Young people have high debt loads from student loans and are entering a work environment where wages have been largely flat for 20 years and benefits worth tens of thousands (like cheap or free employer-provided cadillac health insurance plans or pensions) are rarely offered anymore. About 25% of every after-tax paycheck I have goes to retirement savings and health insurance. So not only has my wage declined relative to inflation compared with my parents at this stage in their career, but I have to pay 25% of my already not-competitive paycheck to pay for benefits they got for free from their employers.", "56" ], [ "I mean isn't that the dream that economists thought would happen as a result of industrialization? <PERSON> predicted in the 30's that we'd be working 15 hour weeks in a generation. I think Japan has the right idea. Automating to eliminate menial jobs rather than the immigration model touted by you that is the modern day version of slavery. Can't find anyone willing to do that job for that wage in your own country? Just bring a third world foreigner here and tell them to do it or they get deported back to their shithole. Really progressive.", "28" ], [ "Even worse is, at this point, almost all of the growth is occurring in developing nations. Look at the CO2 emissions and consumption of resources generated by China's billion plus as it industrialized. Look at India starting down that same road. We're going to have billions of people living in poverty and then waves of pollution as these countries industrialize. They all will want to raise their standard of living to what we have (rightly so) and will want to do it quickly and cheaply (which is dirty). That's how the US did it, how Europe did it and how China did it. Are we really going to be able to tell them no?", "848" ], [ "Japan doesn't have an extensive welfare system and still retains somewhat of the Confucian values of taking care of your parents. Despite their severe population imbalance they are in better shape than we are to weather the coming retirement and end of life of the largest generation.\n\nThe United States is fucked. It's going to be borrowing a trillion dollars a year by the 2020's to pay for its retarded social security system.", "655" ], [ "Its more that the species of horse that has been bred as the racing thoroughbred is at the physiological limit. Making it more muscular or taller just makes it slower. They already have big problems with these horses breaking legs and hooves now because they've been bred to have lighter bones.\n\nTo find a faster horse you'd need to basically go back to the drawing board and start with a new species and then selectively breed breed it for 200 generations until its as refined as the current thoroughbreds.", "351" ], [ "<PERSON> has a history of bucking the Hollywood bubble and then being whipped back into line. I feel bad for him. He's a fragile man who had a decade long meltdown because people liked his show. \n\nWe've seen how intense Hollywood gets when a black man gets uppity with how they've treated <PERSON> the last few days. Not everyone is strong enough to endure that. <PERSON> clearly isn't. He should retire though because he's only funny when he's bucking the party line. Otherwise he's just lost in a sea of whiny black comedians blaming the White man for everything.", "323" ], [ "Satellites are almost all powered by solar. Larger ones have thrusters that use some sort of gas to maneuver. These can be used to avoid collisions, but as far as I know it would have to be done manually as I don't think any satellites have built in collision detection. Smaller satellites generally don't have much or any maneuvering capability and are not made to stay in orbit for long periods.", "576" ], [ "This is why <PERSON> was so harmful. Its 100% true that some police are corrupt and that some kill people without justification. However, these are extremely rare. There are far many more good cops and justified shootings than not. But, because of the <PERSON> scapegoat us against them rhetoric we can't have a real conversation about it. The police are under attack by the media and the left and so they can't say, yeah some of our people aren't good. They circle the wagons because all of them are being lumped together.\n\nWhat the good cops do to protect the bad is exactly what moderate muslims do to protect radial muslim terrorists. One is bigoted and one is laudable to the left.", "582" ], [ "This is my problem with <PERSON>'s management, much more so than his weird investor relations behavior and the fact that he lies out his ass and burns through money at insane rates.\n\nIt makes it so damn easy to poach his top talent. Once Ford and Mercedes and the gang get serious about EVs, they'll have no trouble at all poaching the best people from Tesla. People put up with Tesla and SpaceX's cancerous work environment because its a great resume booster. Nobody I know at either company likes their situation. They do it because they want to land a high-paying and laid back gig down the line.\n\nTesla's set itself up for a massive brain drain and its cashflow woes will make bidding against companies like Ford and Mercedes impossible.", "49" ], [ "Its pretty scary that apparently Tesla has lacking or completely absent procurement and supply chain procedures that allowed open contracts and chain after chain of subcontractors. Its even more scary that <PERSON> apparently only just discovered this.\n\nI'm convinced that there are no companies in Silicon Valley that are competently run at this point. God help the markets if these companies ever get evaluated by investors based on reality and not hype.", "49" ], [ "Based on how bad the problem of subs and contractor agreements apparently is, I doubt the managers have any idea. I've seen this happen at a lot of big engineering companies that are growing quickly. Group manager sets a project and schedule. One of the engineers says I need a contractor to do this and that. Manager says okay send me the bids. Engineer solicits and sends bids and one gets hired. That's the last the manager ever hears of it. The engineer that wanted them hired will have 10 other things to do so he's not standing over them all the time, especially since they probably are working at least some of it remotely in India or elsewhere.\n\nNow <PERSON>'s coming around to all the managers asking them to vouch for their contractors. <PERSON> sees you have the contractor your engineer needed, but you've got at best a few reports from the engineer on how the project is going. No horror stories, but the engineer didn't sing their praises either. You have no idea how the work is split and whether the engineer has been fixing it himself or whether its been good right from the contractor.\n\nYour job's on the line here based on your answer. If you vouch for them and it turns out it was a bad contractor or a bad agreement, you're done. If they were good or at least decent and you didn't vouch for them, you just made one piece of one part of a project harder for someone else in your team. You can hire someone else or just shift work around (or maybe even just drop that part of the project). \n\nThe point is, there are ways for the manager to recover from losing a good contractor. There is no way he comes back from vouching for a bad one.", "641" ], [ "Its also common in places like North Korea where you're encouraged to report neighbors and family that aren't quite loyal enough. No company that is pleasant to work at uses this practice. Any company using this method should be fled from, particularly if they use it on actual employees and not contractors. Employees should be getting performance reviews based on their performance, not a popularity vote from the masses.", "402" ], [ "They are coming here to take American jobs and do them for below the wages Americans would accept. Why do you think RINOs like the <PERSON> bros. want an open border? Its because they, like all corporate shitstains, want labor to always be a buyer's market. America's wages have been largely flat for 30 years. Almost exactly the same period we've been importing workers and entering into globalist free trade agreements. Hmmmm.", "113" ], [ "Possibility Seeker is always positive in a constructed environment. You don't lose the shuffled cards you just put them back for a bit. Even in a combo deck you'd run it for the chance of grabbing answers or more combo pieces. The downside isn't that you might shuffle cards you wanted in hand because you don't have to play it. Constructed isn't so tempo heavy that you lose if you forgo playing a 4/5 on 4. So the downside is you have -1 hand slot.", "286" ], [ "That's what happens when you prioritize hiring programmers that identify as dragonkin over competent ones and set project guidelines based on demographics and social justice instead of what users actually ask for. Google is a perfect example of why Monopoly power, even over a single sector is completely cancerous. Google's stranglehold on search and web ads has made it so they can literally hire thousands of morons and completely fuck up everything else they touch and still stay extremely profitable.", "99" ], [ "You misunderstand. When they say redesign for mobile they don't mean something that works on desktop and mobile. They mean something that works like shit on desktop so you are forced to use mobile, where they are able to collect more data on you thanks to insane app permissions and lack of root access on most phone platforms to block the tracking shit.", "927" ], [ "I know you'll probably disagree with me, but <PERSON> is more of a technocrat than any President in at least the last 20 years. He's the only President since <PERSON> with significant private sector experience. There's room to quibble over whether his experience in the private sector qualifies him in any technical capacity, but even if he was the blundering businessman he's often painted as, his expertise and knowledge in his fields of business will surpass that of Presidents who have spent their entire career in public service or jurisprudence. I think, more than anything, <PERSON>'s business experience is what ingratiated him with voters. So I would strongly disagree with you that technocrats are not electable at the moment. Of course, not all technocrat candidates are created equal, but if you look at who has been winning high-profile Federal elections recently, they tend to be people with more private-sector experience and less raving lunatics or career political types.", "939" ], [ "Well this game is essentially Smash 5 with the old characters put back in. They said themselves most of the mechanics are the same minus a few tweaks and that there weren't going to be many new characters. Basically all the design was already done. They homogenized final smashes and had to make new models for the old characters not in Smash 5. It's more like a remaster of the last game than an entire new game.", "14" ], [ "I think BF1 was properly raked over the coals for what a shitshow it was with how it treated the source material. On one hand I get it, its a game its not meant to be realistic or historically accurate, but if that's the case, why bother even paying lip service to the actual history. You could make way better combat using tactics and weapons of that era if you started with a blank slate.", "896" ], [ "This has more to do with the severity of crashes that cause ejections than actually being ejected. It's hard to get ejected from a vehicle if you just got into a fender bender. Often a crash resulting in an ejection occurs at insanely high speeds with a very solid object or results in a roll over at very high speed. The survival rate of anyone in those sorts of accidents is single digits.", "38" ], [ "Except Tesla has no worthwhile battery, energy capture, or energy storage IP of its own. Its batteries are designed by Panasonic. The proprietary Tesla charging and control software and circuitry is not new or particularly valuable. \n\nAny company that can achieve scale can immediately compete with Tesla in the energy storage department. Tesla is a completely niche player in the solar market so its energy generation business is also nothing to get excited about.\n\nTesla was a company founded on the premise of taking proven electric vehicle tech and wrapping it in a sleek body. Essentially they wanted to be the Apple of cars. This revisionist history that Tesla is actually a technology pioneer in the energy space is nonsense.", "49" ], [ "The Tesla truck is vaporware. Tesla haven't talked about it since shortly after the big reveal and <PERSON> himself deflected like crazy on the earnings calls. I'd bet big that nobody sees a single delivery in the next 5 years. Tesla is also desperately far behind on self-driving and is currently under multiple investigations by the government related to their self-driving. Tesla is more likely to be sued out of existence by the families of the dead morons who let their Tesla drive itself than to have a reliable autonomous semi in the next decade.\n\nThey also don't have a two year lead on battery tech. They are using the same battery tech everyone else has been using for 30 years. Tesla also sheds talent like no other company and so what design experience advantage they do have regarding battery tech walks out the door week by week.", "49" ], [ "What do you like about it over the 911T? The 911T is faster everywhere except 0-60 (I think the new 911T is actually faster than the p100D 0-60) and handles better in any kind of spirited driving. The interior is miles ahead of Tesla. \n\nI'm sure the Tesla is more comfortable on the street with the air suspension, but a Panamera craps all over Tesla's ride quality if that's what you wanted. Yeah a Tesla is the best EV out there, and it has some cool tech features, but that's about it. As a car its no longer special.", "54" ], [ "Unless you're mixing a ton of this shit in a small unventilated area you shouldn't die, but you can suffer respiratory distress and it can damage your eyes. Still not a good idea, but there's no need to panic if you accidentally mix a bit of ammonia and bleach (for example if you were using an ammonia glass cleaner for a bathroom mirror and a bleach cleaner for the sink/vanity underneath it and some of the liquids mixed). Obviously don't pour them into a bucket together.\n\nAlso, regardless of what you're mixing or using to clean, always ventilate the area. Open doors and windows and turn on exhaust fans. If you ever feel any burning in your lungs or your eyes sting like you're cutting a ton of onions, take a break and go outside for 15 minutes. If symptoms don't improve call 911.", "376" ], [ "People generally panic when this happens and it causes everything to clench up really hard. Also, if it goes all the way in it can be really hard to get the anus to open enough to get it back out. Most people sticking things up their ass tend to use things quite a bit bigger and harder than a piece of shit. Also, the colon will absorb most lubricants quite quickly, which means that it can be really hard to get a toy to slide back out.", "581" ], [ "Chances are any company that puts a policy like this in place is smart enough to put a plausible paper trail together when they fire you. Law firms are experts at this stuff and every firm I've ever worked at has said that salary information is \"confidential.\" That means they aren't prohibiting you from talking about it, but part of the conditions of your employment is that you don't discuss confidential firm information outside of those working on the same matter. If you do, or if you go posting it outside the firm they are legally well within their rights to fire you for disclosing confidential information in violation of your terms of employment.", "402" ], [ "Its not surprising when you realize a substantial fraction of the Democrat party sided with sadistic gang members when <PERSON> called them animals. Throw in neocons who don't want peace in the first place and I'm more surprised it even hit 50%. Even if he'd come out of there and announced that NK had turned over every scrap of fissile material to the marines and that while he was in there he also balanced the budget and invented a way to generate power by consuming CO2 in the atmosphere, there would still be a sizable portion that disapproved.", "468" ], [ "They ignored him because he wasn't a white male. The same way everyone just forgot <PERSON> was a woman beating piece of shit the second he got out of jail. It happens because people are not only tolerant of sexual and domestic abuse by black men but considers it a bona fide that makes them more of a \"thug.\" It's the same as how we consider a business person that uses shady practices to make a lot of money a successful businessman and not a crook.", "132" ], [ "If you look at the other side of what she's saying, it is that she thinks everyone in the world is entitled to the full rights of a U.S. citizen. If she thinks there's no difference between denying due process to an illegal alien and a U.S. citizen than she can't find any distinction between a foreigner and a U.S. citizen. This mental deficiency might explain why she was so willing to take hundreds of millions of dollars from foreigners during her time as SOS and as a candidate.", "557" ], [ "Its crazy to me that someone can even make a career out of this. Even the most braindead econ 101 student could have predicted this. Money doesn't come from nowhere (don't tell the Fed). If immigrants are winning and businesses are winning, someone must be losing. \n\nThe analogies people draw to the European immigration to the U.S. during the 18th and 19th centuries are laughably inapt. Back then we weren't importing low-skill workers. We were importing farmers, metal workers, machinists, farriers, and all the other trades of the time. In an era before modern electronics, these were skilled jobs. The low-skill labor we did import led to some of the most repulsive human rights violations in U.S. history. The Chinese that were brought over to build the railroads were treated as badly as African slaves were.\n\nThere are no examples of a country importing masses of low-skilled labor and having a just society and a thriving middle class. Every nation in history that has done this, whether actual slave labor or pseudo slave labor by paying below market wages, has been tyrannical and rampant with human rights abuses. Egypt, Rome, Qatar, China, and the list goes on. Anyone advocating for mass low-skill immigration is either a corporate shill or wants their slave class. Neither deserve to live here much less to be given a say in immigration debates.", "113" ], [ "I recommend everyone read Justice <PERSON>' concurring opinion on this case. He has a very good takedown of nationwide injunctions that provides a lot of great historical context for why they are not allowed. More than anything, this is the biggest threat to the U.S. from its judiciary. If any hack district court judge can make policy for the entire country, there will never be justice. No matter who you support or who is in the White House, there will always be a clown judge from the opposing party there to substitute their own feelings and beliefs for that of the American people that voted for an administration that enacted the challenged policies. Its an absolute travesty.", "861" ], [ "Not true. It was 5-4. There were 2 dissents and each dissent had one justice joining. It was <PERSON> and <PERSON> dissenting with <PERSON> and <PERSON> joining. The standard cast of characters.\n\nThink about that. We were one <PERSON> away from the SCOTUS determining that the President is not allowed to protect national security because he tweeted mean things about Muslim people. Those hacks can't die fast enough.", "988" ], [ "I really think the DOJ or someone in the <PERSON> admin needs to haul <PERSON> back in for this. In light of the SCOTUS opinion, its clear that she was either acting maliciously or was so grossly incompetent that she misunderstood the most basic tenants of statutory interpretation and the rational basis analytical framework. In either case, she had no business even working at DOJ, much less running it. Moreover, if it was the former option, she needs to be tried for treason.", "693" ], [ "The saddest part about posts like these is that Twitter will be long gone by the time future historians study this period. All of these posts by groups like the ACLU that are on the wrong side of history will be gone because they post them on platforms of companies that are also on the wrong side of history. That means in another 150 years we'll have a Robo-Hillary running on a platform of tearing down the third great border wall and admitting billions of cyber-heroin traffickers and people will actually support it.", "633" ], [ "Keep in mind also that this poll was in 2014, before the Iran deal, before it came out that he'd traded multiple terrorist leaders for a deserter, before ISIS was a big deal, before Black Lives Matter and the Ferguson riots, before DACA, before the <PERSON> email scandal broke, before the Paris agreement, before he threatened the UK over Brexit, and before he tried to veto the bill that would allow 9/11 families to sue Saudi Arabia.\n\nThere were another 2 and a half years of scandal-free presidency after this poll was taken. Any other President would have been impeached just for half the shit that <PERSON> did from 2014 to leaving office and he was already voted worst President since WWII without any of that.", "533" ], [ "You can really consider <PERSON> I through <PERSON> as one presidency. All four were giant globalists that did nothing but sell out America at every opportunity and preside over the largest wealth redistributions (from poor to rich and from America to its enemies and rivals) in modern history. Those four presidents are responsible for more than 10 trillion dollars in American wealth being pissed away and going straight into the pockets of middle easterners that want us dead.", "533" ], [ "At least two. <PERSON> is 81. <PERSON> is 85. <PERSON> is 79. <PERSON> and <PERSON> are still young (64 and 59), but both are unmarried/divorced, don't have kids, and are overweight, (and <PERSON> is a diabetic) which are all risk factors for dying young. <PERSON> will be 73 by the start of <PERSON>'s second term so I could see him bowing out too. He's already been on the bench nearly 30 years.\n\nIt would be unprecedented, but its possible <PERSON> could have 4 more appointments during his terms. By 2024 there could be a 5 vote majority of just <PERSON> appointees.", "826" ], [ "It was truly depressing to see four justices admit that the law clearly gives the President the power to regulate immigration, and to admit that overturning the proclamation based on the supposed animus <PERSON> has toward Muslims would be contrary to the large body of SCOTUS rational basis review precedent, and then to still find that they should have overturned it based on animus. Four lawyers, supposedly at the top of their field, were willing to completely and totally fabricate a justification for a pre-determined ruling and fly in the face of over 200 years of precedent. If Congress had any integrity they'd bring articles of impeachment.", "861" ], [ "Confronting the police is idiotic regardless of whether you're in the right or not. Cops don't really know the law. They get training from the department which had it vetted by a laywer, and is supposed to comply with the law, but the cops don't actually know the laws and they frankly don't even remember everything they were taught.\n\nMost cops are just out trying to do their jobs. If you get stopped its because they thought they saw you do something wrong, you look like you did or will do something wrong, or you match a description of someone alleged to have done something wrong. In all of these cases, arguing with them does nothing. The cops aren't going to let a criminal or a suspicious person go just because you tried to quote statutes at them.\n\nIf you're wrongfully arrested, just go with it. The beauty of our system is that you'll get a lawyer and you'll be set free easily if it was a wrongful arrest. Resisting or running your mouth can only hurt you (sometimes fatally).", "141" ], [ "Its right there in the fourth amendment if you read it correctly. It says:\n\n > The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,[a] against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.\n\nObviously if you read that you would understand that this means we have a right to privacy, you shitlord. Then if you read the words \"right to privacy,\" it is obvious that this means the right to get an abortion (and also to pack another dude's fudge). I don't know how much clearer I can make it for you Drumpftards.", "865" ], [ "A common reason this happens is because a lot of people have ridiculously open clubfaces in the backswing and don't get back to remotely square until just before impact. When the ball is moved back in the stance you hit it earlier and for a lot of people that means a more inside-out path and an open club face than their normal impact point, which is a recipe for a huge hook. Its also easier to mishit when moving the ball in your stance so that can contribute too.", "525" ], [ "They know that. The more deranged among them are convinced <PERSON> did ask the Russians to hack the election or hack <PERSON>. The less deranged think they can entrap <PERSON> in a process crime or snag him on some other unrelated thing like they did <PERSON>. Sadly for them <PERSON>'s been rich and famous for a long time and knows how to avoid getting into legal trouble.", "169" ], [ "Ha. They had their minority test case in Missouri. The Missouri State Rep. straight up called for <PERSON> to be assassinated and wasn't punished beyond a meaningless censure. She didn't have to resign, she wasn't expelled. She hunkered down and it blew over. If even a heavily <PERSON> supporting state didn't oust a lowly junior rep for straight up calling for <PERSON>'s murder, why would they fear an consequences for one of the leading lights of the DNC calling for harassment of <PERSON> admin employees? <PERSON> is in an unlosable district. Unless she gets primaried by an even bigger welfare enabler she'll stay in that seat until she dies or retires. They can trot her out to do the dirty work and nothing will ever happen.", "850" ], [ "Yeah, but that's always been the case. This resolution does nothing to move the ball forward on that front. Its just yet another toothless demand for compliance. The previous 100 have been ignored, this isn't going to be different. No other employee in any industry could get away with insubordination and refusing to turn over documents to your boss for a year and still be not only at that job, but not have even been disciplined. Until the articles are drafted and up for a vote, this is just grandstanding.", "641" ], [ "People don't get this about <PERSON>, but his number one priority is success because he values his image as a winner above almost all else. He sees what those of us here wish wasn't true, that <PERSON> is as close to a sure thing as there is in any race this cycle. <PERSON>'s majority in the Senate is 1 vote. He can't really afford to start fracturing his own party. I'm sure he'd like to drain the swamp, but it'll be hard to do that if he's facing impeachment because Democrats took control after the GOP fractured.\n\nAt some point in everyone's lives they have to work with someone they absolutely hate. <PERSON> will gladly work with the <PERSON> and the <PERSON> and the <PERSON> if it means he gets one step closer to accomplishing his goals.", "939" ], [ "<PERSON> knows he won't survive if he fractures the GOP over a shitstain like <PERSON>. The reality is if <PERSON> keeps saying nice things about <PERSON>, <PERSON> looks like a fucking clod to the GOP base when he attacks <PERSON> unprovoked. <PERSON> will vote with the GOP in the Senate because he's a good cuck. He's not <PERSON>. They both want the spotlight, but <PERSON> is used to being hated because he's been a traitor most of his life. He's willing to piss off his colleagues to get a few more minutes of spotlight. <PERSON> is a cuck and won't go against the grain just to get attention.", "800" ], [ "They don't come into the interview with <PERSON> written on their forehead. This guy had falsified evidence. That's bad, but it could entail a lot of things, for example he forgot to check an item into evidence on time and falsified the check in log to avoid getting punishment for breaking the regulation. That's not good, but its a far cry from sprinkling some crack on a dead guy. \n\nI'm all for keeping bad cops off the force, but we get a very selective and narrow picture of what's going on in the news. Its possible that what appears to be a dirty cop is just one that made a mistake. I'm also not defending this particular cop or what he did, but more the concept of assuming that any cop that has broken rules and been disciplined is corrupt.", "141" ], [ "Any Sheriff's office will enforce a court order or a subpoena. However, they don't do it on their own volition. There are specific procedures in place to request a sheriff to assist in carrying out a court order. I don't know for sure, but I suspect if a Sheriff refused to enforce child-support orders when lawfully requested, he could be held in contempt by the issuing court, but I do not know that for sure. It may be possible there is no recourse other than to find another agent to enforce the order.", "260" ], [ "Look at this lady's life story: \n\n > <PERSON>-<PERSON>'s own story begins in the Bronx, the same borough that, along with parts of Queens, delivered for her on primary day. She was born and raised there, the daughter of working class Puerto Rican parents -- her father born in the South Bronx (he died in 2008, while she was in college); her mother on the island -- she went on to study at Boston University and work in the the office of liberal lion Sen. <PERSON> of Massachusetts.\nWhen she returned home, <PERSON> worked as a community organizer and, eventually, with economic stresses rooted in the recession and the loss of her father taking hold, began low-wage, long-hour work at restaurants to help support her family.\n\nSounds a lot like the early days of <PERSON> life, without the Harvard education.\n\nQueens and the Bronx are going to have a great representative for themselves. Someone with no life experience beyond waiting tables, but a sense of entitlement a mile high. She truly represents her constituency.", "259" ], [ "You don't really mention what it is she does that's so bad, but given that you're in pain I assume its going Jaws on your dong. Every girl I've ever had that problem with can't really fix it. Their mouths are too small or don't open enough to not have some tooth on dong action. Or their mouth gets tired quickly and they can't keep it open that wide for very long.\n\nIf that's the case for your gf you're SOL and you'll have to tell her that BJs are out. It's not the worst thing. It will be moderately painful because you've been lying about it so long, but you can get back in her good graces eventually.\n\nIf its a matter of technique (or she doesn't realize she's gnawing on it), you could tell her you like how enthusiastic she is, but when she's going at it, the friction from her teeth eventually causes pain and you've got some suggestions. Just present the problem as small and minor and bookend it with positive things.", "552" ], [ "That's like saying you don't think we should treat people who want to murder people harshly because they haven't murdered anyone. We need to get these people treated or otherwise out of society. Every criminal, whether a pedo or a murderer is just someone with \"Desires\" until they actually do it. Its disgusting normalization of absolutely abhorrent behavior to point to one anecdotal account of someone that hasn't raped a child *yet* and claim pedophiles should be given a break.", "94" ], [ "Teaching isn't really a one-size-fits-all profession. There are public school teachers making 6 figures. There are also public school teachers making 30k a year. Sometimes within the same district.\n\nBecause the majority of teaching jobs are public (i.e. state government) jobs and because most teachers are unionized you end up with the worst outcomes of those things. Namely seniority is king and the union sacrifices junior teacher pay to make the older teachers happy. \n\nTeacher pay was also historically low because they had the summer off and usually had a fairly generous state pension. However, these days schools are so understaffed and underfunded that many teachers are forced to work long hours and through the summer for little or no pay. Many states are also in serious danger of defaulting on teacher pensions because they mismanaged them for decades and are now slashing benefits in a desperate attempt to keep the fund solvent for at least the older teachers (see Illinois). Young teachers are again pretty fucked regarding pensions.\n\nIf you look at private schools, teachers are actually paid quite well considering it only requires a four year degree (although many teachers do have grad degrees these days) and the hours are generally better than most corporate gigs.\n\nYoung teachers need to be paid better, and certainly some states are way behind in what they should be paying, but I don't think its fair to state that teachers in general are underpaid.", "601" ], [ "I mean he says it right in his op-ed. He's concerned about the precedent this sets. Nobody has even investigated <PERSON> and we already have evidence of dozens of people breaking dozens of laws and possibly colluding with people from a handful of other countries, both related to the election and during her time as SOS. If <PERSON> succeeds in axing <PERSON>, the next time a Democrat gets into office will last about 3 weeks after the GOP version of <PERSON> gets appointed. If we decide as a country that Presidents should be surveilled during their candidacy and be subject to endless borderless special counsel investigations, no deep state politician of either party will ever be able to hold office without putting the entirety of the DOJ in their pocket.", "693" ], [ "Its not just Democrats. Nobody in government is talking about making schools safe by applying a TSA-model. The GOP is talking about arming teachers, but that's never going to go anywhere. Most teachers frankly are not responsible firearms owners. I like giving the option to those that want it, but arming teachers is not going to solve this issue. We need to be securing schools, checking students coming in, putting trained officers in place that can identify warning signs. \n\nThe reason nobody in Congress is talking about this is because the truth is our politicians don't mind dead kids. Democrats can use it as an anti-gun campaign ad. Republicans can use it as a law and order campaign ad (or claim the Dems will take the guns away if they don't elect them as the pro-2A candidate).\n\nThe other thing is schools are largely a state and local government matter. Certainly the funding is largely local. The GOP has already blown the budget out the ass this year with giveaways to all sorts of stupid shit and they cut taxes. There's no way they are going to want to allocate another 50 billion dollars (TSA has a roughly 8 billion annual budget and there are many thousands more schools than airports) to renovating schools to make them secure and paying for RSOs. Democrats won't push for it because they wouldn't get credit for it under a GOP admin.\n\nIts honestly so disgusting that our elected officials are so partisan that they'd rather do nothing than take any action and risk losing an edge in the next election.", "225" ], [ "I don't mind not arresting pot smokers, but issuing executive orders not to enforce certain laws is not how you should be doing it. For one the state and federal police have no obligation to follow it, and the next mayor can easily revert it.\n\nBut, the worst thing is it takes the pressure off on actually reforming the law. If all the smokers can already do it openly they aren't going to be pushing as hard for real legalization.", "382" ], [ "Its easy to say it, but its going to be very hard to do. These people aren't going to go back willingly and they are no strangers to mob violence. There are over a million of them already in Italy. Imagine the chaos if even 20% of them resist deportations. Now imagine it in a place like Germany or the UK where there are 10s of millions. It's not a joke that its too late for Europe. Nothing short of a massive military deployment will remove the refugees and the EU doesn't even have enough weapons and ammunition to arm its active troops, much less the ones in reserve.", "678" ], [ "Ironically, the term Uncle Tom didn't come to mean what it does today because of <PERSON>'s novel (where <PERSON> was meant to be a Christ-like figure). Instead, it acquired that meaning after Southern Pro-Slavery groups (who were primarily Democrats) made derivative works of the <PERSON> story where <PERSON> was often turned into a dunce or even a slavery apologist. \n\nEven nearly 200 years ago Democrats were still using identity politics and obscuring the truth.", "303" ], [ "It wasn't a single adaptation. Back then copyrights didn't protect much more than the specific text so it was common for people to make derivative works of popular media. Many of these works were made by pro-slavery groups that obviously wouldn't agree <PERSON> as a christ-like martyr, and so they often made him into a slavery supporter. \n\nI'm sure some Republicans were involved in at least some of these adaptations so I agree that its not fair to make a statement like the other guy did about this being a Democrat thing. But, given the political makeup of the pro-slavery groups in the 1850's and following decades, its safe to say the majority of these adaptations were written or performed by Democrats.", "180" ], [ "<PERSON> is absolutely correct when she says we need to call out fake news when we see it and support brave journalists and their reporting. For example, the NYT is owned by a Mexican billionaire that stands to lose billions if <PERSON> cuts off the flow of jobs and capital to Mexico by killing NAFTA and sending home illegal immigrants and it employs partisan hacks that couldn't write a factual story if you held a gun to their head.", "67" ], [ "The reason people oppose these things is that a lot of these long-shot experimental treatments are incredibly toxic. They have very low chances of working and often patients are too sick and their illness too complicated to get any useful research data.\n\nYes, for terminal patients it doesn't change the ultimate outcome if it doesn't work, but these drugs can give families false sense of hope and can cause agonizing pain to the patient, making their death much more unpleasant than it otherwise could have been.\n\nI'm not opposed to this bill, but there are drawbacks to making experimental treatments like these easier to access.", "764" ], [ "Monarchy does have its benefits. In a monarchy everyone knows where the buck stops. Even if the king had corrupt advisers, the king knew if the people became too unhappy it was his head they would come for, so he had a vested interest in picking his people carefully and watching over them.\n\nIn truth the most efficient form of government is a dictatorship. Power centralized under one person means quick decisions and no bureaucracy. Of course, it would need a perfect human to make sure the decisions are beneficial and correct. But, in reality there are no perfect humans and those that seek power are particularly imperfect, meaning that any dictatorship eventually devolves in tyranny.", "593" ], [ "The register workers are the minority of store employees. They will still need the food-prep staff. Also, most of the McDonalds I go to the people working the register are doing double duty filling drinks or making ice cream or coffee orders. You wouldn't be able to just fire all register staff. You could cut 1 or 2 per shift, but you still need at least someone doing the drinks/ice cream.\n\nYour argument is brought up every single time minimum wage is mentioned on reddit and its always hilariously off base. Losing 1-4 employees per shift from automated registers is a drop in the bucket in a store's total labor overhead.", "616" ], [ "I mean unless she's planning to stick it out until 2024, there's no longer any reason to stay. If <PERSON> gets another solidly originalist nominee on the bench the liberal wing will lose every close case 5-4. Writing 6 more years of dissents won't change anything. Her legacy is already ruined in the eyes of liberals because she didn't let <PERSON> replace her. The only way she can salvage it is if she remains on the bench until the next Democrat takes the White House and there's no guarantee of that in 2024.", "953" ], [ "There's not really a non-devastating way to come out to an opposite sex spouse. Sex positive counselor or not, its pretty much the worst thing you could do to a person. It destroys your family, makes them feel betrayed by the deception, and also destroys their self-esteem by making them feel like it was their fault you were gay, or that you were grossed out by them all this time. \n\nBefore a counselor, I would suggest talking to a good divorce lawyer. I don't see any way coming out to your husband ends in anything but divorce. You'd better know what to expect on that front before you fire the opening salvo.", "732" ], [ "The hilarious thing is that people here and elsewhere constantly suggest exactly that to straight people who have even the slightest inkling they might be gay or bi. People here suggest exploring same-sex relations to anyone who has even the slightest doubt about being straight. Yet, its offensive to gays to suggest that after carrying on an active heterosexual sex life for 7 years, that the person might not be actually homosexual? That's ridiculous. I wouldn't be able to carry on, much less enjoy, sex with a same sex partner for 5 minutes, much less 2-3 times a week for 7 years.\n\nOP can identify however she wants, but it would be disastrous to her life to ruin her marriage coming out and then find out she was just feeling a seven year itch. It shouldn't be insulting to counsel someone to really be sure its what they want before they turn their whole life upside down.", "640" ], [ "It won't be her choice. I can't imagine any person, man or woman, wanting to stay in a marriage with someone that lied about something so huge for the entire marriage. It would also destroy my self-esteem. Knowing that you thought of the other person as your soulmate and the whole time they were grossed out by you and thinking that they'd rather be with another person. That's horrific. Not only do I not think anyone would stay with a person like <PERSON>, but she deserves whatever comes her way. She wasted her husband's life because she couldn't accept who she was.", "901" ], [ "She'll hold out through 2018. If the Dems retake the Senate (or there are signs they could in 2020) she'll try and ride it out through 2020 and hope <PERSON> loses. If <PERSON> wins in 2020 or the GOP keeps the Senate, I think she throws in the towel. She'd have to last until 2024 and if <PERSON> wins in 2020 and the GOP keeps the Senate through 2020, I can't see a realistic chance that a Democrat wins in 2024 either. \n\nI find it hard to believe she gives up the ghost though. She's obsessed with her legacy (which is why she didn't retire for <PERSON>, she wanted her replacement to be nominated by the first woman President) and liberals will never forgive her if she hands <PERSON> another seat. The only way her legacy survives is if she holds on until the next Democrat President.", "953" ], [ "> In the 7591 words contained in the US Constitution, the word God is not one of them. It's fine of course to worship. Just read the Constitution and the Amendments. The liberties given were from the Founders and subsequent lawmakers.\n\nThis is the top reply to <PERSON>'s tweet. This falsehood about where liberties and rights come from is rampant among liberals. None of the founders believed they were giving any rights to anyone. They believed God gave those rights and they were prohibiting government from impairing them. This is made most clear in the Declaration of Independence where it states: \"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.\"\n\nLiberals need government to be the source of rights and liberties because then the government can redefine them or take them away as they desire. Tyranny is impossible under a natural rights theory.", "45" ], [ "Which tracks pretty well. On most holes a tour player is aiming for a birdie. If they take a penalty they are hoping to be able to save par or at worst a single. Most casual players go into a hole hoping for par or bogey. If you can take a penalty and end with a double, your recovery game is relatively equal with a tour player. Of course, tour players are playing on insanely harder courses than most of us, so I'm not saying we're as good as tour players at scrambling.", "286" ], [ "I never seriously considered the 4C because in every video I ever saw of someone driving one on public roads they all talked about how the car is ridiculously unstable and walks all over the road if you're on any sort of crowned or less than pristine road. I could have dealt with the barebones nature and no power steering, but a badly configured steering rack that I have to correct constantly just to keep on the road is horrible.", "257" ], [ "Not that its justified in 99% of the cases, but this is an actual thing. There are minority TA's that handicap or fail white men because they want to take on white privilege themselves or whatever. If you google it you can find people bragging about doing this on twitter, whether or not they actually do is anyone's guess. I'm certainly not suggesting its common or even uncommon, but there are people who at least claim to be doing it.", "987" ], [ "Except every cheat sheet I ever made was either copied from someone else's or just me flipping through the book and copying every equation from the sections we covered in class. I leaned so fucking heavily on those cheat sheets and never actually studied. Teachers might think these get kids to study, but anyone that studies to prepare a cheat sheet would have studied anyway.", "948" ], [ "I don't hate the illegals either. The vast majority are doing what they feel is best for their family. Can't hate someone for trying to protect and provide for their family. But, that doesn't mean we have to allow it to happen either. We've also gotta protect our families by ensuring the country doesn't get overwhelmed by needy dependents or by criminals who sneak in with the good ones. The ones who deserve the hatred are the Democrats who encourage illegal aliens to break the law and then demand the laws not be enforced. Those people are traitors.", "799" ], [ "Which is why everyone shit on Blizzard when they barely nerfed druid with the spreading plague and innervate changes. They needed to nerf UI and/or nourish. Druid decks are almost all combo based and normally that requires a ton of draw. Druid doesn't need that because it can just run UI and nourish and branching paths and it has more draw than any other class and all of that draw provides alternate utility. People complain about druid armor, but that's not that good. We saw a period of 80 armor warriors and it wasn't good. Druids are so good because they can run so much draw in 6 cards that also have tier 1 utility besides draw.", "344" ], [ "Democrat politicians refuse to denounce Antifa who are literal brownshirts. <PERSON> pondered whether we needed to feel bad about <PERSON>'s shooting because she disagreed with his stance on gay marriage (which turned out to be a lie because she's a homophobe). <PERSON> called for people to find <PERSON> cabinet members wherever they are.\n\nI think if you look at the amount of political violence in the last two years, you'll be surprised to see how little of it is conservative caused. The only notable incident that comes to mind of right-wing violence was Charlottesville and that was organized by a fake conservative who was an Occupy-Wallstreet Berniebro a year before he suddenly became a white supremacist piece of shit.", "815" ], [ "Hell, <PERSON> used a shotgun as the example of an acceptable home defense weapon when arguing against allowing civilians to own AR style rifles.\n\nGuns are not the issue. Not treating mentally deranged people and a violent culture are what has changed from 60 years ago when many people owned guns and very few were killed in mass shootings.", "225" ], [ "I don't support forcing anyone to be armed and I know you were making a joke, but one of the journos tweeted they hid while the guy was reloading. If one of them had a gun they could have stopped him. Obviously, it should not come to that, but for myself I would rather have a gun and have a chance to defend myself than to sit under my desk trembling and waiting for the end. People should at least have the option to be able to carry a weapon for protection.", "349" ], [ "> <PERSON> took advantage of all of these breaks in style: he attacked, he pummeled, he aggressively charged forward in spite of obstacles that likely would have finished any other candidate.\n\n<PERSON> admits any other candidate wouldn't have been able to capitalize on these lucky breaks, but his peabrain can't quite connect the dots and realize that means <PERSON> isn't a bumbling moron like he is.", "252" ], [ "It was really sad they didn't nail his ass to the wall for that comment. Even a second rate junior lawyer would have lit him up for that. We aren't talking about 1 of 110k employees here. We're talking about the FBI's head of counterintel and one of only a dozen people on the <PERSON> probe. If he's saying he can't manage the special counsel's 12 people he has no business running a lemonade stand much less the DOJ.", "776" ], [ "I'm convinced <PERSON> is just a liberal operative. He somehow always manages to say something or do something that lets the media blame conservatives for whatever tragedy happens shortly after. He fucked up the free speech shit in Berkeley, he talked positively about pedophilia, and now he talks about killing journalists a day before journalists are killed. This dude is cancer.", "294" ], [ "Yeah its largely a myth that people get hurt badly falling into water because of surface tension. You get hurt because water is dense as fuck and largely incompressible and when you fall into it it decelerates you fast as fuck. If you dive in feet first you break the surface in less than a millisecond and you impart almost no momentum to the water at that point.", "955" ] ]
435
[ 19312, 6277, 6397, 12038, 16387, 14597, 16510, 24314, 11805, 4844, 22814, 4163, 13179, 18914, 19559, 19389, 12877, 6415, 15653, 3785, 16173, 12581, 13059, 5192, 6083, 16244, 1327, 14821, 22816, 3828, 18400, 23163, 18301, 8817, 2403, 8080, 17746, 18778, 2832, 10483, 23820, 15254, 19433, 6303, 17818, 11016, 367, 10185, 20256, 15006, 7932, 13666, 6672, 8773, 24948, 14226, 23124, 5939, 24138, 25268, 23826, 17826, 2225, 11398, 13453, 16611, 25265, 1229, 18692, 5931, 16411, 8284, 11412, 4876, 19567, 2651, 24593, 752, 6272, 23629, 20603, 17340, 5572, 14582, 21648, 11837, 19234, 18807, 21005, 16096, 1238, 9501, 25253, 13608, 4, 4609, 6361, 639, 8384, 2686, 6734, 9370, 6385, 1165, 21617, 6850, 8764, 1059, 22565, 23626, 9599, 17541, 8683, 17497, 20970, 15615, 24343, 22515, 18250, 4132, 17847, 10063, 11386, 19330, 2933, 20368, 3699, 16073, 8979, 12479, 4774, 13411, 7629, 3964, 851, 14676, 11807, 4362, 8994, 21798, 20991, 2164, 18523, 22604, 18477, 8732, 223, 18090, 23687, 25205, 2144, 8108, 13908, 5917, 16149, 22366, 25021, 15092, 24313, 12031, 13625, 16475, 4038, 3735, 18309, 6293, 19114, 12793, 10720, 14972, 21667, 12800, 11831, 3330, 10874, 5155, 5783, 3926, 15223, 13492, 22684, 8980, 16410, 7037, 8540, 22519, 1694, 18718, 18182, 8256, 2912, 184, 8514, 7677, 20460, 9873, 8851, 18393, 19256, 16047, 5696, 1254, 19043, 7495, 10228, 14602, 7364, 15823, 19494, 17759, 21183, 10327, 1678, 3089, 19165, 20280, 19544, 16786, 18831, 9762, 23977, 18, 16666, 17331, 16447, 10700, 13581, 13348, 7954, 25299, 6503, 13029, 19424, 8795, 7613, 13316, 14460, 5265, 16344, 18061, 13142, 18898, 10907, 9082, 10495, 79, 18689, 21120, 17056, 15062, 4708, 19126, 8751, 2583, 18024, 1884, 3588, 18333, 6402, 8674, 19223, 25049, 5169, 22476, 24228, 3029, 23072, 20332, 5555, 15401, 5500, 19429, 6310, 12382, 1796, 10370, 8105, 19094, 9361, 12059, 20038, 2123, 5610, 16015, 8181, 3988, 12626, 3113, 6959, 17599, 10116, 23483, 3721, 9270, 6680, 17064, 13180, 9843, 5068, 24009, 5073, 22444, 14579, 10858, 5672, 11323, 9674, 12391, 566, 10712, 11551, 22567, 339, 19945, 9541, 11306, 1413, 15973, 5018, 9264, 10162, 23159, 24083, 1948, 11359, 9053, 3501, 6153, 6741, 7341, 23482, 18272, 10715, 11141, 18387, 18230, 5336, 13445, 24503, 2846, 5496, 13398, 9051, 6434, 13238, 16540, 14490, 6041, 5651, 13655, 16523, 2053, 13082, 13120, 21590, 14922, 1024, 13520, 9389, 12267, 8838, 4004, 20988, 12136, 13208, 20330, 12294, 6427, 23579, 24093, 1223, 18031, 15098, 5063, 6082, 4487, 4624, 6286, 1079, 11721, 22446, 13767, 18234, 15633, 4861, 6256, 17256, 5471, 16167, 14791, 14246, 7516, 9419, 16286, 5737, 2681, 18535, 1237, 10837, 17271, 1192, 18405, 4161, 11313, 17910, 15200, 14201, 15963, 9964, 21843, 4889, 13341, 19977, 16120, 24688, 23810, 14177, 2362, 12691, 12283, 6877, 16960, 11863, 1881, 4850, 21606, 21229, 1332, 12831, 10497, 18687, 8144, 2026, 16744, 15555, 17950, 332, 1312, 18469, 7904, 2992, 20186, 25354, 11773, 3409, 13534, 24364, 2112, 20628, 21426, 2089, 23331, 7003, 11824, 21674, 1729, 11598, 8627, 23041, 16087, 8558, 23764, 8186, 7004, 1531, 15482, 6335, 3809, 24783, 4875, 17773, 16609, 13157, 17177, 4208, 11996, 13687, 21190, 24693, 12043, 6991, 16869, 11348, 13822, 18725, 8794, 6961, 2127, 633, 17408, 18274, 4590, 22149, 24530, 7050, 17223, 8916, 2105, 5076 ]
reddit_dump_-jp-
[ [ "Yeah, I used to be in a guild with a kid that was that stereotypical hyperkinetic hunter. Hopped around constantly, burst into lolrandom-isms at odd times, that sorta thing.\n\nBut he never did anything toxic, and when it came time to raid he followed instructions, played his class well and didn't make excuses for when he fucked up or dump on people when they did. More than I can say for some of the \"adults\" I played with.", "439" ], [ "idk man, maybe I'm missing some important context, but a blacklist with the express intent that they are \"never allowed in anything that the actual good guilds... are doing\" seems pretty toxic to me.\n\nPlus if what the guy wants is opt-in world PvP, he could just roll on a PvE server and unflag any time he wants to be left alone.", "439" ], [ "I'm not figuring on playing on the streaming server so I don't really have a horse in the race, but if you're on a PvP realm expect to get ganked. And if you're famous--regardless of whether you stream, expect to get explicitly targeted.\n\nAnd--again--if you want to avoid being harassed, there's an easy and obvious way to do so baked right into the game. This blacklist idea just seems like a bad solution to a non-problem any way I look at it.", "919" ], [ "Here are some things that I remind myself:\n\n- Assume everyone around you is explicitly plotting to kill you. I'm not being flippant--you have *no* idea what anybody else is gonna do, and all you can do about it is drive defensively. Plus traffic flows better if you keep a safe distance from the guy in front of you anyway.\n- There is no wrong lane. If you miss your turn, just take the next one. There is *always* a next one.\n- That said, 90% of the time if you are in the left lane (or, if it's more than two lanes the second-left lane) you will be able to make your exit.\n- Exposure therapy helps. The more you drive in an area the more you'll get a feel for how traffic flows.\n- Technology *can* help but it's not a panacea. I recently had a rental car that I could plug my phone into and get maps up on the touchscreen, and that was super useful. I've also had my phone blindside me with directions to turn off onto weird industrial roads for no reason. Use common sense and if you need to stop to figure out where to go by all means do so.", "523" ], [ "Well, of course I didn't mention the bubble, because I don't fault him for that. In fact I'm hard-pressed to think of a reason that would even be his fault. Had that been the only reason the deficit went south under him I wouldn't criticize him for it.\n\nLikewise, if the reason for the deficit was that we changed how we account for our spending, that wouldn't bother me either. But I'm just straight up not willing to ignore that we not only wasted trillions of dollars to arguably make the mid-east situation ten times worse, but we paid for that shit by just pretending it was free and letting it be the next generation's problem to figure out.", "264" ], [ "Where the hell is this crap even coming from? In the last month or so I'm seeing \"oh, well if [racist thing] makes me a racist, then I'm a racist!\" or \"oh, I'm a r.a.c.i.s.t: [stupid backronym]\" or some inane shit like that.\n\nAll this time these chickenfuckers have been so butthurt about some hypothetical lib' calling them racist, and now they *want* people to call them racist? What the fuck?", "715" ], [ "Ah, don't get me wrong, it's not that it's got a conservative bent per-se. I actually kinda like that perspective, since after all who opposes spending less money? It's just that like I said that's a lot to take in and idk that guy from <PERSON>, know what I mean?\n\nI'd also like to see the debt lowered. It doesn't hafta be zero, mind you, but I'm *exceedingly* skeptical that it $22 trillion is justifiable, considering that's [75% of our GDP](_URL_0_).", "264" ], [ "Sorry for the downvotes, for what it's worth it seems like a sincere question to me.\n\nThe [United States Refugee Act](_URL_0_) doesn't as far as I can tell put any such limits on refugees. The restrictions tend seem to be more pragmatic things such as the upper limit on how many refugees we're willing to accommodate.\n\nWhich if you think about it is sensible really. If you're willing to take in people who would be in danger if they returned home, who the everloving crap would care where specifically they came from?", "796" ], [ "I'm genuinely curious how you would more charitably interpret a statement like \"If being against illegal border crossings and taxpayer paying to shelter feed and provide healthcare to them makes me a bigoted racist then I'm a bigoted racist.\"\n\nBecause that sounds to me a hell of a lot like the words of some cumsmear who explicitly abhors providing food, shelter and medical care for people who desperately need it, which is *egregiously* appalling even *before* you get to whether or not his reasoning is racist.\n\nYou *sure* you're on the right side, man?", "799" ], [ "Ah, you misread me. I don't find it *confusing*. I find it *idiotic*. This whole \"you can't say the R-word!\" thing is not new. I'm *well* aware you're desperate to get out from under the ugly facts.\n\nI'm just wondering who in the brain trust decided that reclaiming the word was a good plan. It's such a stupendously bad idea I'm kind of at a loss that somebody even *suggested* it.", "809" ], [ "I'm gonna oversimplify a lot here, but the gist is, Libertarians are ostensibly fiscally conservative but socially liberal. So you shouldn't be expected to pay anybody's way, but aside from that you're entitled to do whatever you like so long as you're not hurting anybody else.\n\nLike any ideology it has some good points and some dumb ones. Take the good parts and leave the rest and don't worry too much about labels.", "627" ], [ "Nng. Okay this might go terribly wrong for me but I gotta at least try to curb this shit as best as I can.\n\nI have some pretty debilitating anxiety issues. I got rid of all of my firearms *specifically* because I was worried I would hurt *myself*. Hurting other people never even crossed my mind.\n\nIt's nobody's fault here, mind you. If you're worried about me, or people in an even worse situation than I am, then thank you. But for everybody else, *please* for the love of fucking God don't dump this mass shooting shit on our heads. You are *not* fucking helping.", "1016" ], [ "I'm not sure it was even a political calculation. We talked friggin' Canada into supporting the war. For understandable reasons <PERSON> had a *lot* of political rope after 9/11, and he decided to hang us with it to make his daddy proud.\n\nAnd it was all perpetuated on lies. He could have just not done that one single thing and I honestly think I'd consider him a good President. :\\", "533" ], [ "I met a rogue this weekend who kept trying to kill the mob I needed for the Voidwalker quest. There's at least three guys who spawn with her so we kept dying without actually getting any of them down. I invited him to a group, we wrecked their shit, I got the choker and let him have the chest and everybody walked away happy. Game's easy if you don't get mad about stuff like that.", "326" ], [ "Yeah, I agree. At the time I gave <PERSON> *way* more latitude than he deserved in retrospect. I wasn't really *for* the war but I could see the argument justifying it, and could even think of some ways it might work out favorably.\n\nI rather admire <PERSON> for being prescient enough to realize from the get-go what a fustercluck it was going to be, but I'm not inclined to be *too* hard on people who bought into a war predicated on lies, know what I mean?", "308" ], [ "Now I wonder if it was something someone Frankensteined together. That’d be even more odd though since it was such a weird form factor. Man I wish I still had the thing now.\n\nEd: so after doing a little more digging, I think I found what I probably had. The Model 25 can be upgraded to use an [NEC V30](_URL_0_) which has 80186 instructions. Whatever I used at the time must have identified it as a 186, and I'm just misremembering the bit about it having an MCA bus since that's one of the first things that come to mind whenever I think of the PS/2 line.", "968" ], [ "Note there's a practical upper limit to how many times <PERSON> can pull off those big flashy attacks. He doesn't have any special cold or heat resistance in particular so producing a lot of ice almost immediately begins to affect him.\n\n<PERSON> though doesn't appear to have any such restrictions. As long as he has a source of sand he evidently can control [as much as he wants](_URL_0_) without limit or effort.\n\n<PERSON>'s best shot would be to get the drop on him and finish it in a single attack. Even then it'd probably be a tall order, since he'd have to punch through <PERSON>'s Sand Armor, which must be *incredibly* dense considering it's one of the few abilities that actually drain his stamina at all.", "183" ], [ "Ah, yeah. I had to go back and watch it again since it's been a while. Of course that was at the very end of the fight, after he'd been extensively using his Sand Armor to fend off <PERSON> in his curse seal form, and his next attack was still to bury him under hundreds of feet of sand.\n\nWhich isn't too surprising really. In Naruto a lot of emphasis is put on the \"completeness\" of a juitsu, and how unwise it is to use a technique that has significant drawbacks.\n\nQuirks on the other hand frequently come with *massive* drawbacks, whether it's <PERSON> breaking his own body because it can't withstand his own power, <PERSON> risking becoming stuck phased partially through an object, or in this case <PERSON> giving himself frostbite. Even his father with all of his natural power and a decades-long career of keeping up with All Might is overcome by his own flames in pretty short order.", "40" ], [ "Yeah, I've been following it since watching <PERSON>'s process is really fascinating. He made a point of making his levels insanely hard, but not have Kaizo-esq bullshit. <PERSON> is actually good enough that he *can* beat his world but it's going to be fun watching him figure out the trick to some levels. Hope they aim for a full clear, since heck, what else are they gonna do on the Backstreet Boys Reunion Tour?", "385" ], [ "That first micro exposure is one of those things that really seems to stick with people. Mine was a TI-99/4A set up in a cubby hole in my grade school classroom. I never did much with it but play Honey Hunt, but it wasn't long before I started making little Hypercard games on the school's IIgs and enviously coveting the IBM PCs that were being advertised on TV.\n\nI wonder if there's a way to replicate that experience for kids today who grow up with a cell phone orders of magnitude more powerful in their pocket. Kids are creative, and learning that you can use computers to make things is a massive game-changer.", "630" ], [ "I dearly miss Steam Train. <PERSON> tended to play more games that <PERSON> loves. <PERSON> strikes me as the kind of guy who will make an effort to enjoy pretty much anything, but still there's a noticeable difference when he's playing an old Sierra game or something of that ilk. I will never forget them losing their shit over the silly madlibs phone sequence in Leisure Suit Larry, for example.", "628" ], [ "This sentiment doesn't make much sense to me. There's plenty of fun games where you use dice to decide results. D & D would be the best example, since you kind of make your own fun in that game and the actual gameplay is fundamentally just rolling numbers to see if you died.\n\nMind you I love a good game of skill--I think I've never had such a good time as recently when I was playing Doom Eternal, zipping around blasting demons and desperately trying to stay alive. I'm just saying there's more than enough room for both, and it's okay if folks like what they like.", "221" ], [ "I kinda wonder what MMO the guy even played where standing there pressing your rotations is all you do. If you do that in WoW, for example, *at minimum* the healer's gonna be fucking pissed because you'll invariably be standing in poop. And on harder content you'll either immediately end up tanking the floor, or wipe the group. Either way you'd be a lodestone.", "439" ], [ "Sadly this is my reason as well. I would probably love MOBAs but the community is just the absolute worst. And somehow it seems like the more developers do to combat that the worse it gets.\n\nFor example, all my favorite TF2 servers had open comms, where red and blu could hear each other. Folks would just chat amongst themselves, sometimes talk smack, and sometimes you'd hear when some sneaky bastard pulled off a particularly cheeky kill (I played Engi and always put my turrets in dumb places, so I got this a lot.) But it was always amicable. Everybody could hear you, so everybody would know if you were being a dick.\n\nOn the other hand, there's Overwatch, which is basically the same game. I quit playing that after about a month, since even though people couldn't talk directly you could tell when they were being jerks. And since nobody except jerks ever had anything they even *could* say, it got unfun real fast.", "372" ], [ "That honestly wouldn't surprise me. What he was accused of was pretty heinous and for a good while we had only the girl's side of the story, and no real reason not to believe her. And then of course the stuff with <PERSON> and <PERSON> actually seems to be true, so you know, as I've said, people are entitled to their opinion of him.\n\nPeople spreading lies about this stuff is all kinds of problematic. It doesn't just affect the wrongly accused, but also people who ought to come forward but think they won't be believed. About all any of us can do though is to be judicious about these sorta situations.", "504" ], [ "Setting aside that there are literally no consequences whatsoever to getting downvoted, I have seen plenty of people criticize <PERSON> without getting dogpiled. It has to be justified mind you, so the most common one that comes to mind recently is that his levels have design flaws that are not reasonable to have left in. <PERSON> just really isn't a scandalous person aside perhaps from being the living embodiment of the \"problem?\" meme.", "263" ], [ "Having given the matter the consideration it is due, and taking into account the facts of the case, the rumor come out. Does <PERSON> is gay? We intend to prove to the court that, in fact, he just came out with his bad rumor which is spread massively. Not this time is about his music career but about his bad rumor. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we will ask that you decide: do you still believe or not?", "12" ], [ "Hm, that gets me thinking. Instead of the rebels you could perhaps have outlaws. Replace the Force with chi-powered revolvers. <PERSON> could be a guy who goes to the frontier of space to find his fortune and runs afoul of bounty hunters who are actively tracking him down and also seeking the same motherload of treasure hidden out in the stars. You could make <PERSON> a feline life form, like a mountain lion kinda. Maybe make him female just to, you know, spice things up a bit. Maybe even give the vessels grappling arms so ship-to-ship combat is more like a traditional bar brawl.\n\nThe only thing I can't figure is what to call it. Star Wars isn't quite accurate anymore, since westerns aren't really about wars usually. So it'd be more like outlaws traveling the stars. I definitely think there's some \"there\" there though. I'll hafta brainstorm it a bit.", "547" ], [ "Maybe next time <PERSON>'s slogan could be Actually Make America Great Instead Of Pissing And Moaning On Twitter For Four Straight Years And Generally Making Everything Worse. It'll be tricky to fit on a baseball cap, but maybe they could use one of those giant <PERSON> fruit hats instead.", "220" ], [ "What's really aggravating is for all the stupid hoops everybody has to jump through to placate their stupid algorithm, it still suggests nothing but things I have already seen. And their curated content is even worse. I don't want to get my information on COVID or race relations from freaking YouTube, and have dismissed it a kajillion times now, but god damn if they don't still continually shove that shit in my face.", "999" ], [ "Which would be relevant if that were happening but it isn't. So-called \"cancel culture\" is nothing other than people using their discretion to choose who to listen to. Perhaps you suppose we ought to have mandatory recitals of <PERSON>? Wouldn't want cancel culture to conquer Communism would we? We could make a day of it, have a Pol Potluck!\n\nThat's effectively what you're advocating for here. This inanity that people can't think for themselves. Hell you can't even come up with your own retort, you just threw mine back at me and actually thought that'd sway me.\n\nAll these stupid fucking buzzwords are like that. Today it's \"cancel culture.\" That's just critical thinking. Before that it was \"social justice warriors.\" That's just people fed up with the rampant victimization of our own neighbors. And before that it was \"political correctness\" which is nothing but telling people to quit being such a fucking asshole all the time.\n\nSo god damn done with this stupid shit. Some talking head coins some asinine phrase and you lot just thoughtlessly shriek it at everyone unfortunate enough to be within earshot, like that crow from that meme.", "828" ], [ "I'm one of the folks who downvoted you and it's in all frankness for this exact attitude. You say you don't want to be a mindless zombie and bully for you for that, but then you aren't willing to take the utterly trivial amount of time needed to even verify your assumptions are correct.\n\nIt's not like anybody's mad at you or anything, you're just spreading incorrect information and the way to respond to that is to downvote it.", "263" ], [ "I reckon that's the only kind of <PERSON> supporter that has any leg to stand on. The idea his bombastic blustering was just an act and he'd go in and shake up politics was an extreme long shot, but I can at least see the rationale. Four years later though, we know unequivocally he's just a bigoted, treasonous, bumbling incompetent, and supporting him today is just throwing good money after bad.", "249" ], [ "I've always been registered non-partisan, leaning towards the (I think, still sensible) idea that all other things being equal, less government and less spending are better than more.\n\nBut that's all things being equal. I will *long* remember that while Republicans were in power, they spent all their time fighting among themselves over which of their cronies to give the biggest tax windfalls to, and specifically how to fuck everyone out of remotely affordable health insurance, and now that Democrats are in the same position the COVID relief bill may very well have saved me from financial ruin at a moment when I most needed that little bit of help.\n\nAny Republican in office today ought to be fucking ashamed of themselves, to say nothing of their party. Pity I know that not a single solitary fucking one of them actually is.", "612" ], [ "Online RPGs are quite an interesting microcosm of actual society. I recall that back when MMOs were basically multiplayer text adventure games, there was an article recounting a case where a player's avatar was repeatedly and savagely violated, and the effect it had on the actual person behind the character.\n\n_URL_0_\n\nAnd then of course there's Penny Arcade's more glib but no less accurate *[Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory](_URL_1_)*", "239" ], [ "If you want something similar that works on an actual original machine, there is also a FPGA VIC-II replacement in development that does HDMI out. <PERSON> [reviewed it recently](_URL_0_).\n\nNote the dev board is too large to fit properly in the 64, so pragmatically speaking this is mostly a project to keep an eye on at this time, but as a proof of concept it works impressively well.", "545" ] ]
409
[ 9614, 4161, 6921, 5209, 9815, 9282, 3409, 18640, 7033, 20026, 25418, 10034, 24240, 5724, 18536, 8751, 11711, 25317, 18367, 323, 16167, 1189, 6359, 14413, 5333, 12277, 17122, 4642, 10536, 9828, 21222, 21519, 18654, 6262, 11278, 12734, 3242, 2089, 18301, 16619, 11348, 1260, 23533, 15929, 19312, 8398, 17063, 12316, 11203, 18069, 5532, 6403, 5173, 9370, 17974, 11831, 4351, 7943, 3351, 10086, 14084, 21293, 9191, 20073, 9933, 21626, 15688, 10639, 10805, 21354, 6420, 18264, 4464, 25483, 24247, 13894, 12412, 1602, 6959, 12899, 17689, 3001, 3809, 21959, 6137, 10683, 22318, 6320, 19670, 7396, 8959, 13755, 24054, 15099, 25442, 20645, 7216, 11103, 6882, 23091, 14801, 12990, 7897, 12897, 6458, 21719, 24409, 19209, 14133, 12599, 10465, 7542, 18844, 9142, 15050, 11169, 11338, 4887, 7247, 14823, 18789, 1248, 19631, 3648, 22828, 16722, 14059, 9778, 8706, 3864, 19497, 15500, 223, 628, 24674, 4202, 8682, 18785, 22749, 14519, 13196, 4387, 11547, 20668, 3030, 4267, 16115, 16405, 8773, 10107, 17591, 23766, 1454, 1193, 24834, 9685, 11460, 19484, 2373, 20376, 8630, 6850, 10916, 18035, 5782, 3938, 555, 14279, 16029, 4939, 12146, 17576, 20188, 3458, 2225, 24041, 11598, 17455, 17777, 17441, 13876, 1323, 13006, 1635, 12477, 18580, 4457, 4419, 23506, 9762, 18282, 153, 3401, 17461, 14384, 17053, 7759, 6873, 20568, 4200, 2735, 768, 23884, 4399, 21749, 7332, 6587, 17778, 6482, 4312, 24200, 7278, 21175, 20364, 13520, 4487, 19061, 5544, 3954, 804, 22439, 18859, 25198, 16628, 6555, 594, 21660, 23543, 11098, 11131, 18437, 1745, 16329, 8785, 20147, 1580, 4708, 23785, 4248, 8118, 21322, 3816, 3435, 24593, 14294, 14726, 21158, 17077, 2555, 18770, 11398, 2217, 24142, 1623, 9626, 16715, 19210, 15992, 8386, 19083, 17533, 2912, 20324, 23124, 10745, 3259, 8834, 5443, 8570, 6106, 16849, 871, 13120, 19614, 2329, 23071, 22296, 5480, 16666, 13401, 11190, 23767, 1406, 4249, 12776, 16149, 4831, 6969, 18689, 14020, 22733, 24139, 2707, 24224, 20038, 15818, 6495, 334, 2521, 16493, 4116, 14121, 11038, 20043, 21500, 8105, 14830, 21120, 22924, 18078, 11625, 1229, 14901, 21224, 24700, 13708, 5898, 2414, 10162, 4765, 25047, 9703, 20961, 24586, 15831, 10121, 7003, 17406, 19707, 2843, 11840, 18249, 14533, 4861, 15342, 17498, 5169, 367, 23492, 18596, 12460, 10609, 681, 4197, 7524, 15981, 5934, 546, 13411, 813, 18685, 19065, 12626, 8284, 9584, 23653, 21168, 17885, 1796, 10959, 12650, 11593, 3861, 18528, 3120, 9118, 12766, 10964, 16803, 2933, 678, 10777, 17193, 12463, 8329, 237, 23080, 17910, 2375, 21648, 15254, 24368, 4362, 15672, 1560, 12102, 16738, 8722, 21116, 11563, 12902, 4055, 3352, 20033, 13465, 10452, 14870, 2057, 18323, 25115, 13100, 15918, 7709, 22280, 12051, 11968, 21762, 7735, 16869, 16054, 9172, 13200, 3922, 10724, 11589, 15006, 23547, 22743, 18447, 12461, 3786, 5653, 23726, 21834, 9039, 14719, 17300, 8712, 15340, 18834, 8095, 2833, 2401, 13070, 16096, 6880, 1389, 22967, 17826, 12054, 8528, 18697, 21951, 11701, 19024, 11883, 14797, 20439, 18722, 22943, 20988, 5119, 6078, 20171, 1413, 12772, 326, 9405, 5738, 7900, 8395, 12720, 9699, 6361, 22237, 22409, 12391, 3279, 19683, 14472, 1472, 11302, 22706, 15630, 17746, 13082, 2832, 24260, 3330, 21379, 17677, 8632, 23131, 19433, 11748, 21346, 10775, 23075, 25064, 3761, 17970, 17583, 17739, 13212, 13221, 6709, 17424, 9551, 17757 ]
reddit_dump_-jute-
[ [ "Well in some case its definitely true, though. Especially in development countries you often only have a single industry and a single employer near you, and not exactly the means and the environment/infrastructure to become self-employed, so you have to throw yourself at the mercy of your employer or resort to illegality. \n\nWe actually saw a film about this happening in places in Latin America, where you e.g. in Colombia in some places either work for the \"cut flowers industry\" or decide to try to smuggle drugs to the US because it pays more and you have to sustain yourself and your family, but I'm sure it happens a lot in Africa, Asia too. \n\nAnd some places in the US and possibly Europe are not far from this either, sadly. \n\nThe solution obviously isn't to nationalize everything, or anything like that, but find a way to prevent some actors in the market to become to powerful that they can essentially dictate the conditions under which the rest has to work and live, such as (stronger) anti-trust laws, support of individual entrepreneurship, co-operatives etc. through building of better infrastructure, education maybe redirected subsidies etc.", "976" ], [ "Sadly this still happens a lot in the world, even in the US, albeit to a lesser extent now than maybe 110-120 years ago.\n\nSo while that is definitely a good idea, something is still preventing the market from becoming a truly free place for everyone (as <PERSON> had envisioned), not dominated by anyone, as laid out in [this article](_URL_0_) by the Harvard Business Review.", "976" ], [ "> > Bartering is only found in post-monetary societies or failed states.\n\n > I assume you're being sarcastic here but, I mean, it's not. Casual bartering exists in every culture - formalizing it is just a question of making it more efficient and reliable, which is where money came in.\n\nThe user might have been exaggerating, but he's not entirely wrong. \n\n > But various anthropologists have pointed out that this barter economy has never been witnessed as researchers have traveled to undeveloped parts of the globe. “No example of a barter economy, pure and simple, has ever been described, let alone the emergence from it of money,” wrote the Cambridge anthropology professor <PERSON> in a 1985 paper. “All available ethnography suggests that there never has been such a thing.”\n\n > <PERSON> isn’t alone. Other academics, including the French sociologist <PERSON>, and the Cambridge political economist <PERSON> have long espoused similar arguments.\n\n > When barter has appeared, it wasn’t as part of a purely barter economy, and money didn’t emerge from it—rather, it emerged from money. After Rome fell, for instance, Europeans used barter as a substitute for the Roman currency people had gotten used to. “In most of the cases we know about, [barter] takes place between people who are familiar with the use of money, but for one reason or another, don’t have a lot of it around,” explains <PERSON>, an anthropology professor at the London School of Economics.\n\n[\"They Myth of the Barter-Economy\" in The Atlantic](_URL_0_)", "170" ], [ "Oh, it does include that and say that inter-community trade was more similar to barter.\n\n > Trade did occur in non-monetary societies, but not among fellow villagers. Instead, it was used almost exclusively with strangers, or even enemies, where it was often accompanied by complex rituals involving trade, dance, feasting, mock fighting, or sex—and sometimes all of them intertwined. Take the indigenous Gunwinggu people of Australia, as observed by the anthropologist <PERSON> in the 1940s:\n\n > > Men from the visiting group sit quietly while women of the opposite moiety come over and give them cloth, hit them, and invite them to copulate. They take any liberty they choose with the men, amid amusement and applause, while the singing and dancing continue. Women try to undo the men’s loin coverings or touch their penises, and to drag them from the “ring place” for coitus. The men go with their … partners, with a show of reluctance to copulate in the bushes away from the fires which light up the dancers. They may give the women tobacco or beads. When the women return, they give part of this tobacco to their own husbands.\n\n > So it’s a little more complicated than just trading a piece of cloth for a handful of tobacco.", "824" ], [ "Yes, but still, it was never the simple barter that you usually seem to get taught/assume took place:\n\n > No academics I talked to were aware of any evidence that barter was actually the precursor to money, despite the story’s prevalence in economics textbooks and the public’s consciousness. Some argue that no one ever believed barter was real to begin with—the idea was a crude model used to simplify the context of modern economic systems, not a real theory about past ones.\n\n > “I don’t think anybody believes that was ever a historical situation, even the economists writing the textbook,” <PERSON>, a lecturer in political economy at the University of Sydney, told me. “It’s more of a thought experiment.”\n\nSome kind of currency or other trade usually took place, I think. The point is, barter economy in the \"stereotypical\" version barely existed.", "170" ], [ "Well, I have seen someone say once that monopolies just show the \"superiority\" of one company and can be an acceptable result of free market competition. Thankfully that isn't really common at all.\n\n > This is why you need a strong state and local government to stop this type of thing,\n\nMultiple people I've seen online or talked to have said that it's somehow the government alone that is responsible for the existence of monopolies, that with no government there would be no monopolies either. They usually can't ever be convinced of the opposite either.", "976" ], [ "Oh right, that was the part referenced by that one famous video about Japan:\n\n > And Russia rushes in out of nowhere and says, \"Stop no you can't do that we were gonna build a railroad through here to try to get some warm water\"\n\n > And Russia builds their railroad, supervised by a shit ton of soldiers\n\n[...]\n\n > Feeling confident, Japan goes to war against Russia, but just for a moment, and then they both get tired and stop", "655" ], [ "Well in any case it at least shows that members of a religious minority and <PERSON> supporters can get along, something you might think is not as much the case with all the hostility you hear about on Reddit, the news or something like that. \n\nThis is probably because nice people don't make the headlines as much, or don't make for a good topic to base an opinion piece around.", "249" ], [ "Maybe you have a different view of \"philosophical anarchism\", but the article on Wikipedia more or less reflects my view on it:\n\n > Rather than taking up arms to bring down the state, philosophical anarchists \"have worked for a gradual change to free the individual from what they thought were the oppressive laws and social constraints of the modern state and allow all individuals to become self-determining and value-creating.\"[9] \n\n > They may oppose the immediate elimination of the state by violent means out of concern that what remains might be vulnerable to the establishment of a yet more harmful and oppressive state. \n\n > This is especially true among those anarchists who consider violence and the state as synonymous, or who consider it counterproductive where public reaction to violence results in increased \"law enforcement\" efforts.", "870" ], [ "> Adjacent to the centre square on the filled-in moat is the \"House of Soviets\", which in 1960 was intended to be the central administration building. Continuation of development was stopped in the 1980s as the massive building gradually sank into the structurally unsound soil stemming from the collapse of tunnels in the old castle's subterranean levels. \n\nDang. How could that happen?\n\n > Many people call this the \"Revenge of the Prussians\" or \"The Monster\".\n\nHahaha.\n\n > The outside of the building was finally completed pending a visit by President <PERSON> in 2005. The inside remains unfinished.\n\nSo it's like standing unfinished for more 50 years, and is probably not going to be demolished soon either?", "199" ], [ "> We make enough food for 10 billion people to eat, but people starve because they can't purchase it.\n\nThat's still true, but also partially because of corruption, not all of which can be blamed on capitalism, I think. But it does play a significant role. The problem is just that it's difficult to implement a system that wouldn't make things even worse, and destroy the progress that has been made already.", "1000" ], [ "If the US hadn't won WW 2 (together with allies), that would have been the end of liberalism. Likewise, if the US had done nothing during the Cold War, the Soviet Union would have grown to be more influential over the time and ended liberalism around the world, like they did in East and North Eastern Europe (though in Finland only in a limited sort of way), Afghanistan etc. In that sense, the interests and threats of the UK/US and liberalism align for the most part, like they did in WW 2", "876" ], [ "I can get better, academic sources (not that you have backed up your claims either) I just picked the text because it was an openly available text that explained my problems with him better than I could have - that he was no democratic socialist and clearly showed signs of wanting to establish a dictatorship from the start, with help of the Soviet Union, and that his authoritarian attitude was not caused by the US or <PERSON>. \n\nThe US didn't want another Cuba on the continent, so they supported the opposition, like they did in Eastern Europe as well.\n\n\"The upper class owned the media and railed against him\". So like with <PERSON> these days? Cracking down on the free press isn't justified either way\n\nNationalizing the economy is very undemocratic, as now an often corrupt or kleptocratic government has a monopoly on everything. Not like <PERSON> cared much about elected representatives providing a check to his power, after all, so I'm not sure how you can claim that this left-populist strongman was an example of democratic socialism. Dictators are still dictators even if their policies are supposed to help the poor and marginalized.\n\nNationalizing also makes the economy unable to make needs everywhere met, resulting in widespread ineffeciencies and food shortages. You don't need sabotage for that, Venezuela and the Soviet Union managed it entirely on their own.", "778" ], [ "On the Discord you were liked even less, at least by the moderators. Source: talked to the one that banned you.\n\n<PERSON> was banned for being partisan, plenty of the sub liked him, especially the centerleftpol crowd, who all couldn't stand you.\n\n > not that it matters, I'm still laughing about how the brightest spot in your day was someone else's subreddit ban. <PERSON> jute\n\nYou are being delusive if you think reddit is the only thing in my life, but maybe it's reflective of your day more. I just was on the bus and checked Reddit because I had time on my may to the medieval fair I wanted to visit, that's all. \n\nAnd to be honest, I have had enough from being active on Reddit for a while and was going to delete the app from my phone now anyway.", "126" ], [ "> You didn't answer my question about India. Let's extend that question to the newly-independent nation's from 1949 through the 60's. Why wouldn't they have embraced liberalism?\n\nSoviet propaganda and/or intervention? Afghanistan used to be liberal. South Korea was invaded, if the invasion had succeeded, they would not be liberal now.\n\n > You're avoiding the fundamental critique - the US didn't support a global liberal order. \n\nThey literally created all international liberal organizations - WTO, World Bank, lead to the foundation of the EU etc. and the world market.\n\n > What was liberal about Vietnam? \n\nDomino theory was the idea at the time. (Not that I necessarily agree with it)\n\n > What was liberal about Guatemala? What was liberal about Iran? \n\nSame reasoning as above (<PERSON>, I don't agree with it all, but paranoia and excessive worries about Soviet influence weren't unfounded during the Cold War with the Soviets)\n\n > Just because the US wasn't as tyrannical as the USSR doesn't mean they embraced liberalism. This is silly, cold warrior nonsene.\n\nImagine acknowledging the US wasn't as tyrannical and still not being a cold warrior now that Russia is expansionist and invading again. I'd rather live under a US hegemony than a Russian/Soviet one like much of my family had to, thanks.", "167" ], [ "Blaming the poor for their problems (which this essentially is) is not just cruel, but also short-sighted, if that many people die from heart disease due to poor lifestyle it indicates some bigger societal problem. \n\nOf course this doesn't have to mean more government is necessary, but not addressing it at all aside from saying \"just drink water instead\" is really way too much simplifying and will lead to resentments, and people like <PERSON> being voted in.", "246" ], [ "> the 1% must not exist, for the sake of freedom\n\nAre you Marxist? \n\n > the middle-class owner of property, this person must, indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible. \n\nI'm not sure how killing or otherwise eradicating the 1 % helps anyone. \n\nAside from that, 100 % of humanity deserve freedom, and if the freedom for some happens at the expense of another part of the population, the solution is certainly not to turn it around because this would just lead to the same and also new problems.", "246" ], [ "\"Haha it's so funny how other subs talk about me a lot\"\n\nRepeat that for almost every day, and then be surprised why you get accused of hypocrisy. Or as one CTH poster put it:\n\n > Wow epic style ownGe my man! love the posts, keep it up\n\n > spending hours a day talking to/about people youve already identified as teenagers is Absolutely LEGEND!", "434" ], [ "Yes, and it was unpopular until then. The genocide clearly changed the minds of many Jews on Zionism.\n\n > And the original Mayflower migrants, as well as many of the subsequent Protestant European ex-pats, were fleeing the violent persecution of non-Catholics in the Old World.\n\nThey had a right to settle and defend to some extend, but clearly things like the Trail of Tears were still atrocities. Same with a lot of the push westward and \"manifest destiny\" and \"bringing civilization\".", "107" ], [ "> I mean, the initial population of Israel largely came from outside of Israel, and settled it, appropriating land occupied by native inhabitants.\n\nImmigration is also not a bad thing, it's not like they invaded it. Also, I'd say they have a claim to the land just as much as Palestinians.\n\n > If the white people were British instead of Jewish, this wouldn't even be up for debate.\n\nOf course not, because British had a country, hadn't been persecuted for 1800 years or so, and weren't just the victims of a giant genocide.\n\nMost Jews coming to Israel were in fact kicked out (expelled) by Arab or Islamic regimes in Iraq and in other countries, or from Russia, and not coming from democratic Western European countries.", "107" ], [ "> The majority of Israeli Jews are Mizrahi\n\n > Mizrahi Jews, Mizrahim (Hebrew: מזרחים‬‎) or al-Mashriqiyyūn (Arabic: المشرقيون‎), also referred to as Edot HaMizrach (עֲדוֹת-הַמִּזְרָח‬; \"Communities of the East\"; Mizrahi Hebrew: ʿEdot(h) Ha(m)Mizraḥ), Bene HaMizrah (\"Sons of the East\"), or Oriental Jews,[10] are descendants of local Jewish communities in the Middle East from biblical times into the modern era.\n\nIn other words, the majority of Israeli Jews are not even from Europe, but often from the same region.", "107" ], [ "> There's a difference between immigrating to a country and forcibly evicting the occupants of land you want and forcing them into ethnic ghettos.\n\nThat is also not what happened when the first Jews settled in Palestine. It only happened during the war 1948 when they were attacked by their neighbors, and to some extent Palestinians were told to leave by Arab leaders as they though they could soon return when Israel would be gone. What I mean is, the history is actually much more murky and not clear-cut, much more than it was the case with the US and Native Americans.\n\nAnd most of the Jews who immigrated to Israel were not rich Jews from the UK or US, but from Russia or even from other Arab or Northern African countries where they had been expelled themselves by the leaders there. It really isn't comparable to colonialism.\n\n > Okay, so any people who suffer a genocide get a free pass when it comes to violently expelling people (who had little to nothing to do with that genocide) from their homes.\n\nNo, but suffering a genocide did show why Israel was needed, and as above, Jews didn't just waltz in and started expelling Palestinians. That is not correct. Some terrorists existed, but equally some Palestinian terrorists attacked those that weren't attacking anyone else.", "107" ], [ "> I mean, there is definitely a historical path where Israel might exist and this violence doesn't occur\n\nOne where its neighbors don't attack it and try to destroy it.\n\n > If Israel wasn't an explicitly Jewish state, I doubt Hamas is explicitly antisemitic in its platform\n\nAnti-semiticism runs deep among fundamentalist Islamist terrorists, it's not all just due to stuff Israel has done.", "686" ], [ "> So, by your estimation, Hamas would exist as an antisemetic organization even if there was no Jewish state occupying the land they view as their homeland?\n\nNo, because they are anti-Semitic, but focusing on Israel.\n\n > I'm not sure why the history of Jewish oppression would matter to the people who lost their homes during the formation of Israel.\n\nIn the end it doesn't, but it justifies the immigration and formation of Israel. And again, the destruction of pre-1948 Jewish settlements by Palestinian terrorists is just as unjustified. Again, there is no obvious lighter shade here, in my opinion it is closer to e.g. the Finnish Civil War where both sides engaged in terror.", "107" ], [ "> I said comparable, not identical. The similarity is that both people-groups feared that if they allow voting rights for their subjects, that they would move from a dominant minority to an oppressed minority. It's not an unrealistic fear, it happened in Zimbabwe, but it's also not an argument for continued disenfranchisement and colonial rule. \n\nAlright, though I still don't like it because it muddies the difference between colonialism and Israel, and ignores the ethnic diversity of Jewish people in Israel. \n\n > A two-state solution would also provide the Palestinian refugees in the diaspora a homeland they could immigrate to\n\nYes, but that solution seems unlikely right now, too, and would likely be insufficient from the perspective of both Israel and Palestinians.", "107" ], [ "> So I'm confused. Is Hamas primarily motivated by a hatred of Jews, or by the goal of ending what they view as Jewish occupation of their homeland?\n\nBoth. I don't think they would cease to be anti-Semitic if there was no Jew left in the region.\n\n > However, those historical reasons don't necessarily grant the Jews a better claim to that land than the people who were already living there,\n\nNo, but they have an equal claim. \n\n > And it's less clear that granting the Jews a homeland that was already inhabited by a colonial populace is justifiable.\n\nregardless, immigration to it was and is justifiable.\n\n > But it isn't clear that doing so wouldn't have been far more justifiable given the complicity of many citizens in Europe in the suffering and extermination of Jews during not only the holocaust, but countless pogroms throughout European history.\n\nOnly Jerusalem has the holy site of the Jews, though, and is the ancestral homeland. And after their experiences in Europe it's not difficult to understand that many would want to get away from it. (Personally, I wouldn't have had anything against carving a Jewish state from German territory, though.)", "107" ], [ "They weren't colonizing the land, they were immigrating to a place to found a country for stateless people like themselves. \n\nAny persecution happened at first, before 1948, only due to terrorists on both sides, which then escalated when the Arab countries around Israel invaded it. During war, it's not easy to avoid horrible things, though some certainly could and should have been avoided. But that is the sad reality of wars. It wasn't like they just went and expelled them for no reason. That's more what happened to Jewish people in many other Arab countries from what I know.", "107" ], [ "> It's not as though this is a normal western democracy like Canada or Australia, where ethnicity isn't considered by immigration policy and where actively maintaining the dominant majority of a particular ethno-religious group would be considered reprehensible.\n\nIt's not, no.\n\n > Israel itself muddies the distinction between liberal democracy and colonialism. \n\nThe current government does with their settlement policy, but that's not inherent to the state.\n\n > \n\nIt's the consensus position of the governments of the EU, UN, Israel, Palestine, OIC, and Arab League. Its also the only solution that can square Israel's aspirations of being a liberal democracy with its existential desire to be a dominant Jewish-majority state. Annexing the West Bank leaves Israel with a declining 57% Jewish majority (declining to 53% by 2035). I'm fine with that (I'm not a nationalist) but its pretty much a binational state proposal. \n\nWhile I'm not opposed to a two-state solution, I have heard a lot now that realistically a Palestinian state would be not much more than a \"Bantustan\" with limited sovereignty and so not enough/not accepted by Palestinians and their supporters.\n\n > Annexing the West Bank leaves Israel with a declining 57% Jewish majority (declining to 53% by 2035). I'm fine with that (I'm not a nationalist) but its pretty much a binational state proposal. \n\nIf it brings peace and retains the function of Israel as a refuge nations for Jewish people from all over the world, I would not be opposed to this either.", "677" ], [ "> See, I disagree that Hamas would be any more antisemitic than average if Israeli rhetoric didn't make it really easy for them to blame their suffering on \"Jews\" qua Israel. I don't think that the propensity of people all over the world to hate Jews would necessarily not also exist with Hamas, but absent Israel, antisemitism almost certainly drops out of their platform.\n\nYeah, I don't think Israel is as much to blame here. Regardless of what Israel would do, Hamas would still be a genocidal regime that would want to kill all Jews in the region.\n\n > At least in 1947, I disagree.\n\nI don't, because Jews were living there already then (and not that few) and because immigration is acceptable. \n\n > What I am challenging is that they have an exclusive claim on Israel which overrides that of the non-Jewish inhabitants who were displaced in the years following Israeli independence. \n\nIt doesn't override it, but as said, the war is mostly to blame for the displacement, and the causes for the war aren't really something you can blame on the Jews living there alone, as they were being attacked by several countries at the time rather than aggressively expanding on their own in peaceful times.", "677" ], [ "> Neoconservatism is not \"any sort of aggressive and chauvanist foreign policy\",\n\nLiterally what I said. \n\n > its the ideological cover given to American imperialism, where strategic hegemony hides behind the concept of a \"greater good\" global policing strategy and liberal orde\n\nImperialism isn't necessarily fascistic. I can see that it would be called imperialism, but fascism seems like a stretch.", "285" ], [ "Encouraging Central Asian nationalism and such might help. r/neoconnwo actually had a decent conversation about it recently, [link](_URL_0_)\n\n > The Chinese and Russians are always gonna be able to outbid/outinfluence so I've always advocated a central Asia policy that asymmetrically counters the strengths of our rivals.\n\n > The primary goal should be to foster strategic and cultural rivalry between China and Russia. This means that the U.S. cannot be seen to be vying for influence in the region as that will encourage Sino-Russian cooperation against the U.S. If we're gonna go full <PERSON>, the U.S. should seek to turn the region into a diplomatic (and even military) quagmire that swallows Chinese and Russian diplomatic/military/financial capital while amplifying the clash of their national interests.\n\n > In this way, America can use the central Asian region towards her national interests. If we try to outbid them, we'll lose and our credibility will suffer or else well get stuck in the very quagmire we want our rivals to fall in.\n\nby u/DeadPopulist2RepME", "753" ], [ "> The LREM parliamentary group is completely subservient to <PERSON>'s will, and has brought ridicule on itself for its complete U-turns whenever <PERSON> snapped his fingers\n\nAnd if they weren't, they would be criticized for blocking reforms or something.\n\n > In effect, <PERSON> and his two closest advisers, <PERSON> and <PERSON>, pretty much run the country.\n\nAnd they can be voted out of office again.", "236" ], [ "> Where do you live where advertising is analogous to mind control?\n\nThat's not exactly what I said, is it? \n\n > What sort of idiot knows about something, doesn't want it, but then sees an ad and suddenly has to get it? This has literally never happened to me in my entire life.\n\nIt's called being persuasive? \n\nThere's no need for mind control involved, just promises like status, comfort or anything like that. \"Buy this and you will be popular\", or \"Buy this and you will have less problems\" etc. are the messages sent out by advertisements. A lot do ignore them, but many also don't and buy things they wouldn't thought they needed. \n\nIn particular all the stupid \"Home Shopping\" ads rely on selling often useless junk like some tilted bowl that is supposed to be much better than a regular bowl. [Link](_URL_0_)", "358" ], [ "Even if I agreed with that, the user spun that into a debate into how \"government\" in general is \"evil\" and immoral, and how it \"initiates violence\" on behalf of people, i.e. the usual \"anarcho\"-capitalist claptrap. \n\nAnd in general, libertarian leftists tend to built on educating people and persuading them to join their cause, rather than to do things like establish \"vanguards\" or dictatorships.\n\n > Why do you think every communist country never got around to removing the state, and even had to drastically expand its authoritarian abilities? \n\nBecause they were authoritarian communists, i.e. Leninists, Maoists or something similar?\n\n > Communism has only ever been successful on small scale, where everyone knows each other and cares, giving them a reason to abide by the system. Communes basically.\n\nThis is exactly what anarchism/libertarian communism strives for: complete decentralization of power and reduce everything to the smallest scale.", "870" ], [ "> Evil, no. Immoral, I agree. The current involuntary large state is immoral in how it operates, and it quite simply does \"initiate violence\" or force to achieve its goals.\n\nThe US? Maybe. The concept of states enforcing rule of law and protecting civil rights? No, because otherwise you have not much left that is protecting the rights of the weak and vulnerable, especially under a capitalistic system.\n\n > Communism can not exist at large scale without being enforced. Someone is going to want to pay someone else a buck to take out their garbage at some point and suddenly you've just brought back wage labor and capitalist trading of goods and services by private parties. Capitalism is unavoidable unless suppressed when not everyone agrees that private ownership and production is bad. And when they have no obligation or reason to work in the collective interested.\n\nCommunists also want to abolish money and persuade people to use other economic systems. Other libertarian socialists have no problem with markets as long as they are not hierarchical (i.e. everyone is self-employed or in a worker-owned company) The latter would certainly avoid the problems you talk about. Instead of working for someone, you'd just work with other people. \n\n > Some I've heard say that the entire society should be socialist/capitalist, not just their community. I'm not sure how those specific people don't see the irony in wanting to get rid of authority but also want to force one way of living at the same time. \n\nSimilar to the abolition of slavery (which still exists in some places in the world) it's an end goal.\n\n > Libertarian communism is a bit of an oxymoron. It's just libertarianism, adding the second label suggests that everyone must use that specific economic system. Having only one for everyone would be very anti libertarian, as its anti self determination and free will.\n\n > The issue comes from the people that don't want anyone to be capitalist, even when it's their voluntary desire. I've never seen an anarcho-capitalist be against people living in communist communities.\n\n<PERSON>, the original anarcho-communist in the 19th century explicitly said that capitalist could try wage labor, but that with the hierarchical organizations eliminated that protected capitalism, it will not thrive and people will not likely turn to wage labor when they can be self-employed or co-owner instead.\n\n > This is exactly what anarcho-capitalists want by the way, anyone can voluntary do whatever as long as in doing so you aren't violating someones rights. \n\nAnd there's no one left to enforce that, since there'd be no independent police, courts etc. anymore. Etc. You know the common criticisms of it.\n\n > Libertarian communism is a bit of an oxymoron. \n\nYou do realize that libertarian socialism was the original libertarianism, and that the word was first described to refer to anarchists? Therefore it can't be an oxymoron. As for economic systems, any left-libertarian will tell you that capitalism is an hierarchical system as well that often only leaves you the voluntary choice between being an underpaid worker or being unemployed.", "101" ], [ "Also, yes, it's blurry. Half the time I'm not even sure what I'm supposed to stand for aside from something vaguely worker-empowering and exploitation-reducing. But that also has its good side, because it means I'm not in any way dogmatic and open to compromises and be convinced by one or other idea as long as it meets some basic requirements. \n\nAnd I believe that way you can achieve much more than trying to rigidly adhere to some theory and accept nothing else.", "647" ], [ "The NAP is the most ridiculous and incoherent \"moral\" principle ever applied and as I said even [libertarians tend to see that.](_URL_0_)\n\n > . Living by principles is the only way to mitigate this\n\nAnd rule-less capitalism would be the worst way to go about this since it will quickly result in criminal exploiters gaining the advantage and forcing other people at gun point to give up their land and work for them, since there is no state and no independent police to enforce property rights.\n\n > <PERSON>\n\nThe person who thinks that women are the sole reason for all war, drug abuse, sexually transmitted diseases and child abuse? Who seems to claim that men never abuse their children? The person who tells young people to leave their families forever and instead pay monthly rates to listen to him? \n\nHis ideas would run all of civilization into ground if they were followed more, and then he'd probably blame it on women.\n\nHe's the worst person I heard about all week and I would hope no one ever listens to him again.", "651" ], [ "> Do you think fair trade goods do more harm than good?\n\nIn general no, though sadly there are probably some exceptions. The comments below [this article](_URL_0_) provide some good points.\n\nAlso, if you have the choice between \"regular\" chocolate between 1 € or dollar and fair trade-organic for 1.30 €, do you really think donating these 30 cents regularly would help more than creating demand for environmentally sounder economic practices and for products from fair trade farms, which already suffer from oversupply anyway?", "618" ], [ "And all those apologies in the comments talking as if consumers and producers in the West only had the possibility to support it or boycott it and put them out of work. As if there's no other option. And if there's none, there needs to be, because the safety of workers is at danger either way.\n\nAfter all, it's not just that the conditions are slavery-like and often even involve unambiguous child labor, the buildings and such are often in terrible conditions, too, and have proven to be death traps more than once. Not to mention that no one can tell me that a company that has driven people to suicide (and fought that with \"suicide nets\") is in any way or shape a laudable improvement. \n\nJust because Europe and the US went through this in the 19th century is no reason we have to let China, India etc. go through the exact same cruel procedure as well. Isn't that what foreign aid and NGOs are for?", "725" ], [ "> Depends on how it's implemented. I don't think state socialism where every bit of the economy is micromanaged is a good idea. There's a difference between cooperative owned companies and state-owned companies. I think people need friendly competition to innovate, and as little hierarchy as possible. Most socialist countries struggle to innovate, while social democracies are at the top of the innovation index.\n\nIf I agree with this, does this make me a social democrat, too? :P", "534" ], [ "> That is about literally what opposing capitalism entails.\n\nIt can also be opposing to the accumulation of capital, buying out of businesses by foreign investors and hierarchical companies. Instead advocating for some sort of economic egalitarianism, with co-operatives. If that's still capitalism to you, then whatever. Post this to r/muhcoops/ for all I care.\n\n > It's less about \"ideological purity\" and more about \"following base crucial pillars on the fucking ideology\".\n\nWell, I don't follow your ideology, so this doesn't apply to me. I'm proudly not a Marxist.", "870" ], [ "A decade ago? Oh wait, 2007 really is already 10 years ago, I was wondering what kind of crisis there was 2002-3.\n\nIt's true they have problems, but somehow they managed to avoid most of them and seem to be doing the best out of all nations hit by the recession. Better than their neighbors, better than Spain or Portugal and [much better than Greece.](_URL_0_)\n\nThat might have to do with how they don't have that many social programs as those countries did and how they avoided large spending projects (like the Olympics) and didn't rely on the building sector for growth that much (like Spain)\n\nBut the flipside is that while the state is doing relatively well, there are still problems with poverty and other things. Pensions aren't exactly high and the healthcare system, while being universal, suffers from underfunding.", "841" ], [ "Even in closed rooms. Also, you can build an FM-radio on your own, it's a very low-tech system, and much safer from hacking and all other things plaguing digital technology. With RDS and such there's in my opinion not much of an advantage left aside from \"more channels\" and \"better sound (in some places)\".\n\nWith digital you get either good sound or none at all, with analog you can still make out news, weather and traffic reports even when coverage is bad.", "443" ], [ "Not just did they manage to counter the thread of communist Russia successfully (even if with a significant loss, but considering their odds it's still almost a miracle), what's so special about Finland is that they *also* managed to squash the fascist threat from within. \n\nGiven these things, this is really one of the anti-communist leaders that can be celebrated with less reservations, since as far as I know the only morally repugnant thing he's associated with is the White Terror, and this was during a civil war, where the enemy wasn't exactly a moral paragon either. This isn't to relativize those crimes, but to show that it wasn't as unprovoked as for example the coup <PERSON> ordered or the disaster that was the Vietnam war.\n\n(And by the way, Finland lost all that they gained in the Continuation War, and had to cede even more territory, including their access to the Polar Sea.)", "167" ], [ "That's not really true. Not all market economies are capitalistic. Capitalism is a system, and no more natural than some other economies. (Communism not being one of them, obviously)\n\nIn fact, it requires a state, private property rights (not just personal property) and other institutions like a bank and some sort of stock exchange or equivalent to function properly. Communism, as it was the case in the Soviet Union, China etc. also requires a state.\n\nBut there are also systems that can arise naturally aside from an non-capitalistic market economy (which is what I would favor) and don't require one. One of them is explained neatly in this article by the [Atlantic](_URL_0_)", "101" ], [ "Well, I thought the difference exists because unlike with species, \"races\" are biologically equal and exist only sociologically, so saying something both unscientific and derogatory about any of them would be \"racist\", but the same is not true for species, so \"speciesism\" is usually not unscientific, since difference between species does exist.\n\nHowever, I think you're correct after all that you could call it \"speciesism\" if you think the Neanderthal is inferior just for not being a homo sapiens.", "177" ], [ "There are decent historical or geographical ones that can really spark a huge interest in you. The trouble is you can't as easily look up whether what they are telling you is right. \n\nSometimes I have also seen political ones make good points, though they probably tend to be, like news sites, at least slightly biased to one side.", "566" ], [ "> and I think I always read The Lord's Believers as just the evil fundie faction.\n\nMost players actually still seem to do, but since I got into contact with the quotes before the actual game (and in fact only got the games because of them and the story in general) she was, together with <PERSON>, my favorite faction from the beginning on and the one I like to play as the most. \n\nI also like how the game managed to have a diverse cast while at the same time not making it look it was forced onto the game. It all made sense with the backgrounds and formed a coherent story together.", "14" ], [ "Social conservatives have also noted the similarities between feminism, or some kinds of it, with their views. See [here](_URL_1_)\n\nOr [here](_URL_0_)\n\n > The 1989 cultural freakout over the 2 Live Crew album As Nasty As They Wanna Be was fueled by the religious right, which viewed it as a threat to purity and chastity. Today it would be much more effectively opposed by feminists as a retrograde product of \"bro-culture\" and an encouragement to rapists. I leave it to others to figure out which charge is more moralized. \n\nInterestingly, this isn't limited to feminism in any way:\n\n > Even \"natural family planning\" methods that were the secret knowledge of extra-chaste Catholics and extra-crunchy liberals are now a [hot investment in Silicon Valley.](_URL_2_)", "278" ], [ "And I thought the r/anarchism mods were supposed to be the worst in the leftist part of Reddit.\n\n > Edit: HOLY FUCK they just banned me for posting porn in a completely unrelated sub...funny thing, after criticizing the furry ban in someone's post over there, they LOOKED THROUGH MY POST HISTORY to find just the slightest thing they could possibly ban me for. Way to go guys.\n\n > Edit2: and I'm a fucking socialist\n\nWay to alienate your userbase. This is strange, I suppose authoritarianism ends up having similarities no matter if it comes from the left or the right. Authoritarian centrism might be different, though.", "728" ], [ "What exactly do they hope to achieve with this? For their remaining userbase to understand how important they are? I thought socialism was about self-organization, so shouldn't you just expect the creation of a new sub somewhere?\n\nReally though, a strike by moderators of a socialism sub is as if managers in a factory went on a strike for their workers to recognize their importance. If they really think this will affect their posters and commenters and make them compliant, then this seems to belie their alleged true beliefs in socialist ideas. After all, this would imply they think their post- and comment-workers aren't able to organize themselves, which, as I said, is what I would expect real socialists to do.\n\nEdit: \n > People are not seriously taking part in political self-reflection over important issues\n\n > A common sentiment is that the moderators are being \"authoritarian\", well we are interested to see how community self-moderation goes.\n\nIsn't that how it technically should have been from the start? Of course that's probably not actually possible due to Reddit's system, but involving the userbase more should be a good idea and in particular be very much in line with socialist ideals.\n\nSomeone likened what happened to the behavior of abusive partners, who will blow everything out of proportion and then try to guilt-trip their opposite into submission. \n\nEdit 2: Less than two hours later, the strike seems to be over.", "126" ], [ "Oh gosh they are using \"amerikkka\" unironically, I thought this was just a term made up by those mocking them...\n\nAside from that I have to admit that even if it's of course wrong that you can't do better than Cuba did, it is true that the current Western lifestyle is still rather unsustainable and would require more resources than exist and infinite growth to continue in the next decades, both of which are impossible on this planet. \n\nThis is really something that is to my knowledge also said by almost all liberal environmentalists. (I mean, otherwise you'd have to disagree with the linked BBC article, too)\n\nThe problem here is how far they stretch this in an attempt to defend Cuba and disparage the US, because obviously even with a more sustainable lifestyle that doesn't rely on any exploitation of the poor (e.g. Foxconn or child labor in clothing factories in South Asia) or of natural resources around the world you would, through trade, specialization, innovation etc. still be able to have a much better and higher standard of living, even if it could be somewhat more modest than what exists now.", "519" ], [ "Not being submissive. There's nothing wrong with that if you do it voluntarily. I was talking about treating someone as if they were, or had to be submissive to you regardless of whether they want to or not.\n\n > Saying someone is hot doesnt mean that they are just that and not a full human being, it only means that they are also hot. \n\nSure, I agree with that.\n\n > Same thing for even vulgar sexualization, those women are there because they are attractive ( lets say <PERSON> ), but they are also more than their body, and I dont see how sexualization could imply otherwise.\n\nIt would depend on the context. In some works women certainly don't seem to serve any other function other than to be a sort of \"sex object\". \n\nThis isn't even necessarily the case in pornography, but it can be in other ones, and can also be prevalent to some extent in some young people, particularly those who seem to talk about \"friendzoning\" the most.", "506" ], [ "I don't think you understand what I mean. Sometimes women are depicted in a way that objectifies them, e.g. by making them little more than \"trophies\" or when they just are there to fulfill a character's sexual desires, and have no free will or desires of their own. This is often criticized as objectionable.\n\nBut that doesn't of course apply to all depictions of attractive women. It's about the context, and the intent behind a picture or an appearance in a comic, film or video game. \n\nIf there's nothing either way, then I guess you could see it as both. And sometimes such a depiction can also be empowering/feminist. It's not a black/white thing.", "506" ], [ "I looked at it half an hour or so ago and one of the first posts is literally again about how the horseshoe theory is wrong, forgetting that it's never been a real theory, just an informal view held by some people. Is there any reason for still going on about the same things?\n\nHere's an idea that /tifu seemed to do well with: ban low-effort or \"common\" posts or redirect them to a general thread (like r/badlinguistics)\n\nThings like \"got the definition of socialism wrong\", \"says the political spectrum is a horseshoe\" etc. could go in there, which would then leave more space for actual, new posts.", "728" ], [ "> The deconstruction of morality for an ethics more in harmony with our biological characteristics.\n\n???\n\nSounds like an appeal to nature, which is a horrible way to build a code of ethics.\n\nAnd coincidentally, 'free love' is one of the things I disagree with the far left on, while otherwise I'm socially liberal enough to be called a 'bleeding heart'. One 'political test' called me 'socialist bleeding heart traditionalist' :D", "230" ], [ "> wew\n\n[Link.](_URL_1_) It actually says \"communist\" but that's what you get if you are in support of welfare and measures fighting income inequality...\n\n[This](_URL_0_) is the older one. It seems I shifted towards being more conservative/communitarian socially, while also being more left-communitarian economically. Still all in all a \"moderate\", though.\n\n > Not quite right. Someone on askphil recommended me this book that I think adresses some of my thoughts.\n\nAnd what did you mean with \"natural\", then? More in line with the \"natural\" needs and abilities of humans?", "870" ], [ "> If we improve that situation as well as finding a more sustainable immigration plan then the far rights base will be diminished entirely (What else would they even have to draw upon?)\n\nI sure hope so. \n\n > Just calling them racist and doing nothing else doesn't work anymore than simply just calling Commies 'reds' didn't work in the Cold War\n\nOf course not, especially since it's often just not really true unless you are being somewhat pedantic/academic. A lot of it is unintentional, too.", "1020" ], [ "> But what is the alternative?\n\nSupporting fair trade and ethical business practices? Also, aid can also take the form of microcredits or similar, so it'd be \"helping someone help themselves\". What do you think most NGOs are you doing there right now?\n\nFor example, you can buy cheap chocolate often made with child labor (often tastes mediocre, too), or you can some that is better for some mark-up which can make it possible for children in those countries to go to school and get a better future.", "974" ], [ "> You're stating that everyone is the same and all people of a certain group can be accurately stereotyped like that.\n\nI wasn't. I was just trying to explain what I think he meant. Besides it wasn't a serious point, more like a generalization to make a joke or something.\n\n > of which your definitely projecting your own prejudices by stating all \"rich\" and \"white\" people are the same. \n\nAgain, not my own views. I certainly know that you shouldn't generalize, and I don't do that either. (Check my posts if you don't believe me) \n\nAnd I think this was just a joke anyway that you weren't supposed to take so seriously. Yes, a bad one, but still not meant to show that he thinks white people are all the same and rich. \n\nIt's like when some are saying \"New Yorkers\" when they mean \"hipster\" or something like that. It's of course not true, but stereotypes are sometimes used to make jokes, or bad jokes.", "987" ], [ "Canada and Australia are also the \"kidnapping capital\" of the world, by the same reasoning.\n\n > On the face of it, it would seem Sweden is a much more dangerous place than these other countries.\n\n > But that is a misconception, according to <PERSON>, a sociologist at the National Council for Crime Prevention in Stockholm. She says you cannot compare countries' records, because police procedures and legal definitions vary widely.\n\n > \"In Sweden there has been this ambition explicitly to record every case of sexual violence separately, to make it visible in the statistics,\" \n\n > **\"So, for instance, when a woman comes to the police and she says my husband or my fiance raped me almost every day during the last year, the police have to record each of these events, which might be more than 300 events. In many other countries it would just be one record - one victim, one type of crime, one record.**\"\n\n > But <PERSON> says the statistics don't represent a major crime epidemic, rather a shift in attitudes. The public debate about this sort of crime in Sweden over the past two decades has had the effect of raising awareness, she says, and encouraging women to go to the police if they have been attacked.\n\n > The police have also made efforts to improve their handling of cases, she suggests, though she doesn't deny that there has been some real increase in the number of attacks taking place - a concern also outlined in an Amnesty International report in 2010.\n\n > \"There might also be some increase in actual crime because of societal changes. Due to the internet, for example, it's much easier these days to meet somebody, just the same evening if you want to. Also, alcohol consumption has increased quite a lot during this period.\"\n\n > **\"But the major explanation is partly that people go to the police more often, but also the fact that in 2005 there has been reform in the sex crime legislation, which made the legal definition of rape much wider than before.\"**\n\n > The change in law meant that cases where the victim was asleep or intoxicated are now included in the figures. Previously they'd been recorded as another category of crime. \n\n[Link](_URL_0_)", "878" ], [ "Catholicism is one of the pillars of modern Western academics, it founded and funded the first universities. It kept the records and writings of ancient writers alive (alongside with the Muslims), which made the scientific revolution and the renaissance possible in the first place.\n\nMany famous scientists were Catholics, including the [first developer of the Big Bang theory.](_URL_0_)\n\nIf you're looking for a \"blind faith\" denomination, Catholicism would be the wrong one to look at.", "320" ], [ "Sorry, but how can you make such a blanket statement on the scientific community? You didn't even specify any fields or particular problems except from \"some studies are bought\". That's why you read through donors and affiliations and are critical, but dismissing all of science seems really unreasonable considering they are the foundation of the society we are living in.\n\nIf you reject all of science (which you seemed to do for me), how can you justify living with the results and developments stemming from it?", "569" ], [ "> But you have to recognize that it's gone up in the past two years as well.\n\nThe study looked at the long-impact over several decades, so what might be called \"fluctuations\" like that isn't included. Also, did it even go up? I hadn't heard of that.\n\n > If the studies finding that immigration equals low crime, does that mean immigration is going down?\n\nNo, but that immigrants in the long term can be more law-abiding than natives in some regards, I think.", "113" ], [ "You misunderstood, they aren't related in that way. The study said that generally there is no link between increases in crime and immigration, only some decreases. \n\n > Higher levels of immigration are in fact related to a drop in some types of crime, they discovered.\n\n > “The results show that immigration does not increase assaults and, in fact, robberies, burglaries, larceny, and murder are lower in places where immigration levels are higher,” said Dr <PERSON>, an Associate Professor of Sociology at the university.\n\nPerhaps this is because they tend to be more cautious and law-abiding, from what I have heard.", "113" ], [ "Probably hurtfully accurate, at least with a surprisingly high number of people calling themselves anarchists.\n\n[One commenter](_URL_0_) makes a good point, though:\n\n > \"Is that person wrong though? Being fat isn't an inherent bad thing. There are plenty of fat poor folks and there have been for centuries. \"\n\n > Actually : no. Both the imply of cartoon and you are wrong. Because you are both missing the context.\n\n > At this time, most of the poor people were actually thin and being fat was considered a priviledge. Because appart from exceptions, there were little or no fat poor people. For obvious reasons. As long as nontheless capitalism was working on scarcity (you can read <PERSON> about it) but it was the war.\n\n > Now a day, you can eat a lot of cheap and shitty food. So for most people it's not that hard to eat a lot even if you are poor. Consequently it's not hard to get fat even as a poor person. As I'm both.\n\n > On a class point of view, this has only changed by nature. Plus at the time, many rich bourgeois were actually fat, and doesn't feel like it should be shamefull because it was a sign of \"well being\" and external wealth. Now a day most bosses and capitalists are thin because it's the modern sign of health and wealth. Back in 1936, there were no such thing as \"slimfast programs\" and other detox and diet rehab stuff.", "379" ], [ "> He absolutely did. He said things that were repetitions of the same claims Breitbart previously made.\n\nThe only thing he said was that he didn't trust mainstream media, which many <PERSON> supporters and moderate libertarians also don't do.\n\n > That is pretty much the #1 thing white supremacists want to hear: someone who superficially doesn't agree with them agreeably repeating a whole bunch of their talking points, as it gives the impression that they aren't just a lunatic fringe.\n\nA whole bunch? It was literally just the one about the media. He didn't say anything about immigration, \"races\", religion, politicsm or anything else like that.\n\n > Repeating white nationalist talking points - especially for someone who superficially appears far less extreme than white nationalists - absolutely is enabling them.\n\nTalking points can be used by more than one group. Criticism of media isn't limited to white nationalists.\n\n > That's absolutely preposterous and nowhere close to anything I said. It's not that it agrees with a position white nationalists also happen to hold, it's that it's specifically uncritically repeating white nationalist propaganda.\n\nI believe he is still vehemently opposed to white nationalism. This means that yes, he shouldn't have given that interview, but his intention was still not to show any kind of support for that site. \n\nOn Twitter, when someone asked \"I don't disagree with what you said in the interview, but I am confused as to why you'd want to be associated with Breitbart.\" he said \"because people need to stop fearing dialogue between supposed \"sides\" of the political spectrum\". [Link](_URL_0_)", "614" ], [ "> tweet about <PERSON> being 'red-pilled'\n\nThat was probably a joke. \n\n > and why does he constantly moan about 'Cultural Marxism',\n\nProbably picked up the term somewhere and has no idea what it means himself.\n\n > Could it be that 'classical liberal' is a shitty euphemism and these people are, as <PERSON> explained, fascist enablers?\n\nEh, or they are just uneducated videobloggers who don't really know much about what they are talking about and take what seems to be the most common position of young video gamers, something akin to \"brogressivism\".", "294" ], [ "> but only under capitalism have they expanded to oppress those beneath them and be suppressed by those above. \n\nUmm? Feudalism and other systems certainly had those, too, and to a much larger degree. 17 points, too.\n\nThat sub is really what Soviet reddit would have looked like if it had been around back then.\n\nEdit: This is even called out by a responder:\n\n > Lol WTF are you talking about? Apparently the plebeians and serfs of old weren't being oppressed. It's OK to criticize capitalism but you seem to suffer from historical blindness.", "778" ], [ "> Makes me feel real good though.\n\nYeah, it's one of the most efficient simple ways to help improve your mental health or keep it in good shape! I almost always feel better after just ten minutes spent outside in broad daylight, and sometimes at night, too.\n\n\"[A new study, based on reports from more than 10,000 individuals, has found that physical activity, whether or not it is classified as exercise, can have a positive effect on emotional well-being.](_URL_0_)\"", "412" ] ]
19
[ 5667, 17790, 1155, 6499, 8617, 13768, 12159, 12359, 23281, 12866, 19900, 8273, 22422, 12933, 14527, 12156, 21492, 24854, 2574, 15614, 24303, 15628, 18082, 13181, 7870, 11143, 15546, 10947, 17054, 8863, 20134, 12430, 3117, 23523, 6906, 11409, 2200, 3299, 4835, 13114, 1752, 20530, 19760, 15882, 10390, 8978, 11984, 12860, 21433, 25471, 710, 342, 8568, 10196, 12420, 10970, 9409, 892, 18731, 24328, 6190, 21177, 15233, 22795, 22619, 18606, 4488, 21418, 19305, 4651, 8077, 4929, 5653, 2230, 7277, 11395, 869, 6115, 20556, 25505, 9239, 7999, 1806, 8993, 8058, 6739, 5731, 201, 9257, 6259, 1700, 25472, 11280, 8128, 978, 7301, 4280, 23833, 21703, 11084, 25359, 112, 9193, 12227, 16947, 988, 18756, 2502, 6704, 13646, 14449, 20507, 21643, 10262, 19647, 12598, 18623, 54, 18751, 12913, 22801, 4115, 20983, 23974, 5878, 1103, 14520, 364, 6702, 24028, 16978, 11294, 1756, 15496, 14938, 11966, 1362, 11316, 11565, 19138, 270, 5059, 23171, 11755, 7709, 13451, 4655, 8804, 24962, 11923, 1365, 24060, 22741, 21060, 7764, 7671, 2736, 3937, 15731, 9939, 9740, 9228, 21680, 10429, 373, 11700, 5901, 827, 13077, 1037, 20858, 11656, 10449, 4347, 2794, 12872, 23318, 18174, 2895, 10199, 7204, 25541, 25306, 24756, 15014, 10376, 17349, 16666, 22807, 18420, 6162, 1193, 10914, 9745, 4940, 999, 9910, 4553, 4442, 10815, 20811, 7700, 11359, 16628, 21090, 10186, 16677, 15223, 15441, 14112, 17687, 1108, 2974, 21148, 16830, 9143, 2783, 2675, 10026, 14433, 23805, 11129, 5682, 2420, 14821, 2282, 9813, 19178, 18021, 8052, 40, 13749, 17801, 19934, 492, 7155, 19813, 3757, 22372, 15220, 15500, 24878, 1475, 13977, 8510, 6321, 7028, 10564, 5431, 1095, 1770, 12307, 4162, 1370, 19668, 23422, 6655, 22998, 13833, 23586, 5663, 15404, 6972, 13264, 3053, 21414, 5443, 9684, 115, 2158, 13573, 25463, 10219, 4366, 21751, 4418, 18067, 24507, 1961, 23928, 23404, 14415, 2344, 13572, 8248, 15188, 20076, 4081, 19301, 22586, 12585, 82, 24482, 18379, 16033, 7278, 22081, 8118, 7925, 19220, 5546, 13930, 5316, 3021, 1885, 10482, 7320, 12803, 6105, 12744, 8221, 13159, 12650, 11130, 7034, 893, 23600, 20146, 13718, 3453, 22089, 5339, 24006, 879, 6922, 7215, 23746, 10014, 9361, 8713, 1259, 327, 5392, 16115, 11692, 21922, 13613, 21741, 18412, 11592, 9323, 9261, 15475, 6419, 15151, 20409, 21284, 19495, 17225, 13537, 7356, 18881, 6670, 13380, 18714, 21604, 22567, 24514, 11298, 42, 14023, 2486, 9920, 20625, 15356, 4872, 19248, 11210, 23860, 10897, 7367, 12335, 7926, 11422, 24424, 926, 10761, 22281, 16495, 25523, 4532, 4820, 887, 25021, 1080, 8328, 10022, 22, 16792, 23312, 16781, 4027, 5805, 22641, 14896, 18044, 17236, 10007, 491, 16463, 25533, 21504, 10850, 5997, 25423, 1112, 1909, 11159, 11922, 8307, 2807, 5272, 3361, 12486, 23588, 15127, 15916, 11834, 22041, 3090, 19078, 785, 12043, 1973, 22117, 5689, 22489, 11281, 9904, 10519, 13299, 9742, 12402, 5173, 4501, 917, 4277, 18034, 17805, 16902, 7444, 10593, 11580, 18271, 11491, 15681, 1210, 6482, 16496, 1145, 9907, 17820, 21140, 13859, 13328, 22072, 5582, 14118, 9363, 21890, 13126, 24083, 2024, 10465, 25307, 24337, 14250, 20574, 19850, 20063, 2964, 12527, 15979, 1535, 1488, 15132, 25201, 456, 6886, 14405, 5463, 4193, 25455, 5039, 24834, 7944, 24483, 13260, 13186, 20286, 5824, 8045, 5727, 1937, 7695, 22886, 16182, 10389, 25181 ]
reddit_dump_-life_starts_now-
[ [ "Edit: \n\nUpdated information as of 6:54 PM EST\n\n > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ON BEHALF SHERIFF <PERSON> AND THE GILCHRIST COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE:\n\n > At approximately 3:00pm this afternoon, two Gilchrist County Deputy Sheriffs were shot and killed in the Ace China restaurant in downtown Trenton, after a suspect walked up to business and shot both deputies through the window. As fellow deputies responded to the scene, they found the shooter deceased outside the business, and both Deputy Sheriffs where they died of their wounds.\nAt this point, it remains an active criminal investigation with no apparent motive or indications as to why this tragedy occurred. Sheriff <PERSON> has been on scene throughout the afternoon with his deputies and their families, notifying additional loved ones, and will be speaking to the media at 7:00pm EDT.\n\n > A Media Staging Area has been established in front of Duke Energy (not related to the incident) at 1532 East Wade Street in Trenton, Florida. Requests for footage of the scene will be accommodated and updated briefing times provided as soon as they are available. Officials from the Levy County Sheriff’s Office, the Alachua County Sheriff’s Office, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, and the State Attorney’s Office have all responded to the area to assist.", "553" ], [ "Florida is so low probably because old people + hispanics.\n\nLots of old people and old people generally aren't super obese because you can't get super old while being super obese.\n\nLots of hispanics and most people don't put a lot of weight on until they're older. Median age of hispanics is 25, and median age for whites is in the 40s.", "379" ], [ "I'm planning on moving to one of these green states. I want to be around fit people. (I live in a middle state). Its really obscene how obese everyone is here. \n\nBut not only obese in their body, but obese in their minds. I live on the 4th floor of my apartment, and I always take the stairs, even when carrying groceries and stuff. People always look at me like I'm an alien. They say stuff like \"is the elevator not working?\" and \"why are you taking the stairs?\". I also sold my truck and used the money to buy a bike last month and it just dumbfounded my neighbors. They looked at me like I was crazy when I told them I sold it to buy a bike. I get weird questions why I buy food like \"That's a lot of vegetables, do you work for a restaurant?\". Everyone here is completely averse to any kind of physical activity and healthy eating.", "644" ], [ "Yup. I love it. I actually don't have a gym membership right now but I use my stairs as my gym. My building is 6 stories tall and I will just hit the stairs for 20 minutes every day just going up and down the stairs. I get crazy looks haha. \n\nI also weigh 465 pounds so I guess they think I should be in a mobility scooter.", "412" ], [ "I actually tried this last time unripe avocados were on sale at Aldi for 25 cents each and I bought 40 of them. \n\nI put 5 in a brown bag with bananas, 5 in the fridge, 5 just sitting on the table alone, and 5 in my fruit basket [this thing on my kitchen counter](_URL_0_). The ones in the fruit basket were ripe the fastest. They were surrounded by apples, mangos, bananas, limes, oranges, tomatoes, onions, etc above and below them. They went from 100% hard avocados to ripe in less than 2 days while the rest took 4-5 days or much longer.", "794" ], [ "No limit. I live in small town missouri and no one knows what avocados are lol.\n\nDo you mean neat as in tidy and not messy? I try lol. It's a blessing to have a roof over my head so I try to keep it nice.\n\nAnd yes, fruit is awesome. I'm pretty much whole food plant based so I don't eat any processed stuff. I also buy a lot when it's on sale. That pineapple was 99 cents and the oranges were 1 dollar for 3 pounds :D", "783" ], [ "No one ever got obese from eating watermelon. \n\nProcessed and refined carbs are bad. Good wholesome carbs from whole plant foods are fine.\n\nObesity is caused by excess calories. It doesn't matter if its extra carbs, or extra protein, or extra fat. If you eat more than you use, you're going to gain fat.", "956" ], [ "That's fine. I'll take it. I've lost 140 pounds on a high carb diet so its not making me fat. Its just calories in, calories out. And carbs happen to be where the most nutritious food is. Sweet potatoes, brocolli, spinach, greens, mushrooms, tomatoes, onions, quinoa, etc, etc. All these awesome healthy and anti cancer anti heart disease foods are all in carbohydrates.", "978" ], [ "Yep. Keto is just a fad diet like everything else. Its not hard to sell a diet that lets you eat all your favorite greasy food, and then depletes your carbs in your muscles and liver, and thus water weight, so you drop a lot of weight quickly. But its just water. \n\n\nIf keto helps people lose weight, go for it. I'm all for it. I'd rather have people on keto and losing weight and keeping it off than staying obese, but its when they try to say its the ONLY way to lose weight, or its the healthiest diet, that I start having a problem with it.", "978" ], [ "> People have absolutely gotten fat from eating whole-grain pasta/bread, though.\n\n\nPeople have gotten fat from overeating calories. The reason I said no one's gotten fat from watermelon is because in order to hit a normal persons regular 2000 calorie diet, they'd have to eat like 20 pounds of watermelon.\n\nAnd honestly, I seriously doubt many people have gotten fat from whole grain pasta. Its pretty hard to eat enough to gain weight. What they're getting fat from is oils and cheese and calorie dense products poured all over the pasta.\n\nThere is only around 550 calories per pound of cooked whole grain pasta. That's a lot of food for only 550 calories.\n\n > carbs are less filling\n\nNo they're not. White bread and processed carbs are less filling. But Literally the most filling food is boiled white potatoes. [source](_URL_0_) Second is oranges.\n\nPlant food is incredibly filling. Today I stuffed myself on a pound of spinach, a pound on tomatoes, and a pound of onions. I was full for HOURS after eating that.\n\n\n > eating foods with higher glycemic index contributes to heart disease.\n\nUh, so again, don't eat white bread and processed garbage.\n\n > Eating carbs is bad for endothelial health\n\nThat is not a road you want to go down if you want to talk about endothelial health while promoting animal fats and animal proteins. There is far more evidence to show that endothelial cells are damaged by animal fat than from \"carbs\".\n\nLook, I'm not arguing for eating donuts here. I'm talking about whole plant foods.", "261" ], [ "I'm a vegan that eats a whole food plant based diet with the addition of clams, oysters and mussels. I've found that it gives me the perfect combination of health and ethics, as clams and mussels and oysters have no real central nervous system. I was having a really hard time getting enough protein on a vegan diet, and I have 250 pounds of lean mass that I'm trying to maintain as long as possible.\n\nBut I agree with you on everything you said. Its really factory farming that produces so much harm, but to our bodies and to the animals. If everyone could reduce their animal intake to just grass fed and hunted game, we'd be a lot better off as a society.", "909" ], [ "LVNR/blood chokes are safe with young healthy males, but if you try it on a person over 35 in poor health or someone with cardiovascular disease, you can kill them or cause a stroke.\n\nWhat can happen is you can overstimulate the carotid bodies, a cluster of cells in the carotid arteries that senses pressure build up. This can cause a huge overstimulation of the vagus nerve, which downregulates heart rate. If it downregulates it too much you can kill the person. In younger people, direct stimulation of the carotid bodies is actually a technique that a lot of old school paramedics use to lower heart rate in tachycardic patients. I've seen it used on a 19 year old girl with a HR of 200 that had taken too much cocaine. He was able to get her HR down to 110 just from stimulating her carotid artery.\n\nBut anyways, what is more likely is that with the crappy diet that most Americans eat, the vast majority of men over 30 are going to have some cardiovascular disease, and plaque build up in their carotid arteries. When you do a blood choke, you are risking breaking off that plaque and sending it to their brains. Which can cause a stroke and permanently disable them or kill them.\n\nThis happens to older men sometimes when getting choked out doing BJJ. You can find several instances by googling \"triangle choke + stroke\".", "955" ], [ "I used to raise rabbits and chickens for food and I killed them myself. I'd eat wild game a lot too. \n\nPersonally, I enjoyed the meat, but the act of killing them myself is too much for me to handle. Its not something I wanted to keep doing, and if I can't kill them myself, I don't want to outsource the killing to other people.\n\n\nAs far as mussels and oysters.. They're more like mushrooms than mammals. They are just biological water filters. There is no brain or anything that can feel pain or even experience the world. There is more evidence to show that mushrooms experience the world more than clams do.\n\nThe health benefits are also out of this world for oysters, mussels, clams, etc. Huge amounts of omega 3 fats and good quality protein. A lot of vegans would be pissed off at me for eating them, but I'm not choosing my diet so I can get membership into a club. I'm choosing it so I can reach optimal health and wellness for myself.\n\n\nI've also lost 140 pounds since I've been eating this way :)", "517" ], [ "Is there such a thing as too many greens? \n\nI recently mentioned on reddit that I pretty regularly consume 1 to 2 pounds of mostly raw leafy greens like romaine, arugula, spinach, kale, etc. Someone told me that it was bad to eat that much, but I feel great. In fat, I feel better than I ever have in my entire life.\n\nShould I cut down? Are there any negative effects that I'm risking?\n\nThanks.", "327" ], [ "No!\n\n If your slow cooker will not boil water, do not cook beans in it!\n\nSome beans like kidney beans need to be boiled for a few minutes at least to kill off certain anti nutrients that can make you very sick. I have personally experienced this. 3 days of horrible cramping and diarrhea. Do not recommend.\n\nAlso if you're just a single person, I'd recommend the [$59 instant pot](_URL_0_). Its more than big enough for 1 or 2 people.", "740" ], [ "Start climbing walls. Train for what you're failing at. You're not failing at squats and stuff, you're failing at climbing walls. Find or build a wall and fucking climb it every day. Multiple times per day. Get out there and do it. \n\nI don't know how you didn't figure this out after the first failure. If I failed a cell biology test I'm not going to go study bird anatomy to work on my biology knowledge. I'm gonna study cell biology every day until I get that shit down.", "306" ], [ "No I'm not. I've read studies about people that get gastric bypass surgery. SMO people, people that used to weigh 500/600 pounds like me, always have a lower metabolism once they reach their goal weight when compared to folks that have been at a normal weight for their entire lives.\n\nResting metabolic rate is 25% lower per BMI in super morbidly obese people compared to regular people. \n\n_URL_0_", "379" ], [ "I'm making a bean soup right now actually.\n\n So I just put a cup and a half of beans in the instant pot with cumin and seasoned salt and vegetarian better than bullion, set it for 35 minutes. On the stove in a big wok I have 2 onions, 5 carrots, 5 celery stalks, cook for 10 minutes, then adding 1 cup corn and 2 cups chopped brocolli cook for 10 minutes on low. After the beans are done, I'm putting everything in the wok inside the instant pot. Soup done.\n\n\nIf you eat meat, you can make the beans with something like chicken thighs instead of the vegetable stock. Just throw in a couple thighs with the beans and let them cook for 30 minutes. The meat will fall off the bone and all the flavor will be imparted into the broth. Its pretty good.", "324" ], [ "That's cool. How has your hunger been? I used to be insatiable when I was eating the standard American diet. Now I get full pretty quickly after about 6 to 7 months on a WFPB diet. Even for months on a WFPB diet I never got full. It's like there was no off switch in my brain and I just ate all day long. Now it seems like that's been fixed for me.", "327" ], [ "So this is blowing my mind, but I gained another inch in height in the last 4 months when I lost another 80 pounds.\n\nWhen I went to the doc last September they measured me at 5' 9\", then I lost 80 pounds by february and was 5' 10\" at my next Dr's visit, now I just had another Dr's visit this week and I was 5' 11\".\n\n2 inches gained after 165 pounds lost!!! I may be 6 feet tall by the time I lose the rest of my weight!", "115" ], [ "OK that's it. <PERSON> is one I stopped watching after 10 minutes but with all the threads about it, I have to go back and watch it now.\n\nI will report back later!\n\n\nEDIT: \n\nOH GOD.. <PERSON> SLICES ON WHITE RICE?!?!?!? \n\nEdit2: Wow, I feel horrible for all those EMTs. That is not worth the 9 bucks an hour they're all probably making. They need hazard pay for this.\n\nEdit3: what... does <PERSON> do for that food...Oh god... what does he do...", "337" ], [ "I cook 99% of what I eat and I also weigh everything. Right now I'm eating 1500-1800 calories per day and losing about 3-4 pounds a week.\n\nI went 2 weeks without losing anything when I was at 2200 calories per day.\n\nHowever I haven't been exercising like I normally do because of my gallbladder pain and for the last 3 weeks I've been pretty sedentary.\n\n\nI just adjust my calories when I stop losing weight. I personally think my maintenance calories right now is around 2500 calories.", "516" ], [ "Check out r/instantpot - Its awesome\n\n\nFor me, I don't ever really use recipes. I just use what I have and what works with beans. I just made a bean soup today that is really yummy. I put 2 cups of beans in the instant pot with some vegetable stock and seasoned salt, and on my stove I sauteed carrots, onions, celery for 10 minutes, then added corn, and broccoli for 10 more minutes. By the time I was done cooking the veggies, the beans were done, and then I combined them all in the instant pot and let it cook another 5 minutes. Boom bean soup.", "324" ], [ "Taking the child away from their parents can often be worse than leaving them with them. She thought she was protecting her kids. Look at her body language. She thought someone was in the house coming after her kids. She was not trying to hurt anyone. \n\nThis can easily be managed with medication. She doesn't need to lose her kids over this. She's 23 years old. This is likely the first case of her mental illness. \n\nUntil more information is known, and depending on if drug use was a factor or not, I'll be withholding judgement.", "851" ], [ "Its a lymphedema that is caused by obesity and a lack of proper blood circulation, and excess insulin. The dark coloring is often from something called acanthosis nigricans\n. Its a thickenening and darkening of the skin, caused by too much insulin and insulin like growth factor 1 in the blood. Insulin and IGF-1 are hormones that \"build\" your body. They signal for things to grow, essentially. Places like skin are extra sensitive to these hormones, especially because new skin has to be growing to hold in the obesity, and so they start building up more and more keratin(skin protein) over top their skin until it gets darker and darker. \n\n The skin also ends up getting less blood supply and fluid drainage, because the excess weight puts pressure on the veins and lymph vessels(lymphatic system drains extra fluid in between cells back to the veins).. When you have less circulation of blood and fluids, you end up getting ulcers and sores, and injuries take much, much longer to heal, and become sites for an infection called cellulitis(this almost killed me in 2015). A lot of diabetics end up losing their legs from infections from small injuries, like as small as mosquito bite that they scratched too much and it became infected.\n\nWhen you see <PERSON>, he has the worst case of cellulitis I've ever seen, even in medical textbooks. The fact that he is alive honestly blows me away.\n\n I had it in a much lesser extent as these guys, but it made my lower legs about 2 to 3 times thicker than they should be. After losing only about 170 pounds they just completely deflated, which is the perfect word to describe them. They look like wrinkled deflated balloons. \n\nSurgery is the only thing that will take away the loose skin.", "160" ], [ "> 18-8-306 \n\n > Any person who attempts to influence any public servant by means of deceit or by threat of violence or economic reprisal against any person or property, with the ** intent thereby to alter or affect the public servant's decision, vote, opinion, or action** concerning any matter which is to be considered or performed by him or the agency or body of which he is a member, commits a class 4 felony.\n\n\n\n > (o) \"Public servant\" means any officer or employee of government, whether elected or appointed, and any person participating as an** advisor, consultant, process server, or otherwise in performing a governmental function, but the term does not include witnesses.**\n\n\nPretty sure this statute has nothing to do with EMS.", "733" ], [ "Ah. I bet that's fun. Probably lots of druggies?\n\nI did my EMT in Tucson, AZ. Really busy. It was pretty fun. Lots of traumas. I did like 100 hours of clinicals in only level 1 trauma center in southern AZ. It was a teaching hospital and they let us do as many extra shifts as we wanted, so I took advantage of that. I got to get a lot of trauma experience really fast. I really enjoyed it. \n\nWhen I moved to Indiana I had to do some extra CE and clinical hours to get certified there and it was not fun. Pretty much all alcoholics and drug addicts. We had a dude that I got to see about 4 times in a week. Always drunk on mouthwash. Didn't even know that was a thing until I tried my hand at EMS. Got puked on a few times. Can't stand the smell of Listerine to this date.\n\nAre you a medic or an EMT?", "898" ], [ "I take my BP every day. Right now its 105/66. Its higher in the morning, 126/77 this morning, lowest at night , sometimes in the high 90s, low 100s(systolic).\n\nI changed my diet to a whole foods plant based diet about 6 months ago and that's how I've controlled it, and lost 175 pounds. Dropped my total cholesterol from 280 to 130 as well, no statin. Also exercise. Although I haven't been able to exercise as much since the pain has been getting worse.\n\nAlso, I've been losing about 20 pounds a month. Should I put off surgery and just deal with the pain for a few months? If I lost another 20-40 pounds would that reduce the risks?\n\nI'm terrified of going under anesthesia.", "35" ], [ "You cannot outrun a bad diet. Weight loss happens in the kitchen, not the gym. Just remember that.\n\n.5 lbs per week is pretty light. You have to realize that at those settings, a few slip ups here and there, going over your calories, and you're done for the week. OR a few days of not keeping up with your exercise and you're done for the week. If you decide not to exercise one day, and go over your calories by 100 calories, you won't lose weight.\n\nWith a goal of 0.5 lbs per week, you have to be absolutely 100% precise. Everything, I mean everything that goes in your mouth that contains calories, has to be weighed to the gram. No exceptions.\n\nAlso, as long as you get enough protein to maintain your muscle mass, which for you would be something like 60-70 grams per day, maybe a little more if you work out a lot, the macros don't really matter. Its more of a function of what keeps you satisfied in a certain calorie range. \n\nIf I were you, I'd up my goals to something like 1 pounds per week, and that way you're covered with any slip ups.", "35" ], [ "Well, most plant based cultures that have the best health consume less than 5% of their calories from animal products. So 3 meals out of 21 meals is 7% of meals. It depends on how much animal product you're eating for that one day per week to figure out the calorie count. if your normal days are 2000 calories and your cheat day is 3500 calories, its going to work out to more than 10% probably of weekly calories being from animal products.\n\nPersonally if you're going to eat animal products, I'd keep it to one meal per month.", "516" ], [ "You basically can't unless its juiced.\n\nI mean, I eat 2000 calories per day and probably 1 to 2 pounds of fruit per day and I'm losing crazy amounts of weight. So if you're worried that you can't drop weight while eating massive amounts of fruit, I'd say don't worry as long as you're eating less calories than you expend.", "35" ], [ "Agreed on 2. Its such an important thing that $40 or $50 bucks can save your life.\n\nThese are the ones that I have, and I've tested them and they both work great.\n\n_URL_1_\n\n_URL_0_\n\n\nThe Kidde is the best. It registers very small levels of CO so you can tell if you're getting a lot of low level exposure, which can still be harmful but not over the limit to set off the alarm.\n\nI've set one up about 10 feet from a fire where I was sitting before and was getting like 75 ppm of CO. Its good to know. \n\nAlso I'd highly recommend these rechargeable EBL 9V batteries. _URL_2_", "672" ], [ "I don't because I've had bad lucky with vagabonds/dirty kids. One of them nearly burnt my house down and stole my shit for drug money. Another one's dog shit all over my carpet and then he refused to clean it up. Another one accidently left his heroin rig in my truck. I only found it a week later. Had I been pulled over I would have caught a fucking felony for my good deed.\n\nIt also pissed me off how you guys fly signs like you're homeless, but you're homeless by choice. I was homeless for several years because of mental illness and other problems out of my control, and I never flew a fucking sign.\n\n\n\nAlso, [this](_URL_0_) is why I don't pick up vagabonds.\n\n\nAlso, you seem like a real piece of shit.\n\n > \"being homeless and constantly traveling around is a decent way to avoid paying child support.\"\n\nAnd\n\n > I dropped out of school with $20,000 in student debt. Three years and thousands of miles later, I haven't made a single payment on that debt and it hasn't effected my life in any way whatsoever.", "681" ], [ "You basically said everything I wanted to say. Great reply. I've had a few encounters with dirty kids or whatever they call themselves and theyve all been terrible. These people will use you up as fast as they can. You're just another commodity for their use. And it was pretty obvious in ops post that he views us that way. \n\nAlso, they all smell terrible. I don't want that stink in my vehicle.", "98" ], [ "I'm disabled and live on 750 dollars a month. I just know how to shop for food. The sales dictate what I buy. This week I'm having a lot of nectarines and pineapples, because pineapples were a dollar each, and nectarines were 45 cents a pound. Also I'm eating plenty of bananas. I get organic bananas for 10 cents a pound because I buy the ones the store marks down as \"bad\". Because they're all brown. I just take them home and freeze them all. They're perfectly ripe.", "783" ], [ "Hey bud, watch your oils, and get dressings on the side at all times. \n\nMake sure to track all of your calories. Dressings, oils, sauces, etc, all are very easy to hide calories in. \n\nHoney mustard, for example, is fucking evil. One of these [bois](_URL_0_) is 200 calories of pure fat and sugar. \n\nIf you need any weight loss tips, shoot me a PM. I've lost 200 pounds in the last year.", "516" ], [ "I basically knew it was wrong ever since I heard a discussion involving <PERSON>. Dude has impeccable logic. I still continued to eat meat, but tried to get it from ethical sources, and then decided to raise all of my own meat so I knew how the animal was treated. But that didn't change the fact that I was killing to eat, and I was a killer, to eat. And I wasn't willing to keep doing that.\n\nBut I guess my point is, it takes time. It took me 5 or 6 years \n of knowing that it was morally wrong before I ended up going vegan. OP knows it wrong. That's a huge, HUGE step. The best thing we can do is encourage her.", "909" ], [ "> Have you tried the awesome replica products like Beyond / Vivera / etc. ?\n\n\nNope. I don't have those in my area. The only place here that sells the fake meat is walmart. They have some good sausages. They're so calorie dense though! They're actually more calories than actual meat! \n\nI find myself craving BBQ chicken quite a bit. I need to figure out something I can make with that flavor/texture I suppose.", "18" ] ]
61
[ 15296, 5953, 14047, 9968, 5068, 1200, 16035, 11537, 23928, 18850, 3779, 8600, 6537, 17465, 11600, 10244, 1423, 11978, 25265, 9970, 7240, 1670, 4996, 12576, 6408, 2362, 3603, 10214, 12851, 20024, 13142, 8619, 20457, 17496, 8135, 7282, 5069, 9682, 7659, 25362, 8502, 7687, 20336, 13348, 17466, 3495, 12002, 17482, 25394, 24286, 13123, 8692, 21944, 13987, 5029, 11626, 16382, 14518, 14201, 19026, 16996, 4853, 10696, 4020, 10785, 12364, 3414, 3577, 24788, 15429, 20836, 5040, 17049, 24477, 14629, 12090, 18807, 679, 19417, 22411, 372, 8067, 17193, 3145, 15082, 3138, 3247, 1711, 7629, 6095, 9539, 3009, 4245, 17629, 9188, 19101, 2157, 23063, 11666, 19679, 5336, 10640, 14011, 17365, 10141, 16104, 18263, 4656, 7757, 14282, 844, 3903, 4718, 2275, 5108, 14947, 462, 22024, 19939, 7710, 1024, 19849, 8757, 24157, 20332, 22768, 20098, 21191, 22176, 22627, 22949, 5129, 20956, 5831, 2032, 4645, 4545, 20630, 17675, 21961, 21488, 14948, 22366, 16447, 7075, 1507, 15280, 25154, 9599, 3990, 12607, 597, 12447, 5482, 20018, 410, 14856, 14246, 8794, 1728, 6113, 8108, 22560, 2046, 14691, 15757, 2097, 14429, 20251, 5905, 25510, 6029, 2127, 19592, 12579, 11289, 8008, 145, 4897, 11012, 6681, 13974, 7338, 499, 11864, 9248, 10397, 1522, 14949, 20786, 24147, 20653, 18991, 13778, 16268, 25051, 13359, 6052, 3695, 11664, 5411, 1981, 3767, 17788, 13014, 6635, 18831, 1238, 19162, 7516, 19978, 14355, 22745, 23159, 20930, 14885, 8607, 13627, 3, 13365, 2137, 23930, 6558, 10025, 7609, 4252, 10445, 18983, 19348, 5397, 23901, 23771, 2019, 18642, 14467, 7677, 11059, 19234, 23388, 18002, 8549, 23242, 2208, 1967, 23265, 10667, 12451, 23205, 16882, 3510, 24025, 1845, 6685, 18165, 1786, 21782, 23393, 13953, 25364, 2570, 10597, 20291, 15813, 3762, 10079, 9811, 15655, 24487, 24868, 4612, 14952, 5518, 16156, 7419, 5071, 11317, 24686, 39, 13027, 24476, 4926, 8416, 17476, 11555, 8375, 16710, 7593, 8537, 12999, 22112, 22254, 21100, 1192, 493, 18971, 16907, 13238, 15617, 14639, 3209, 2489, 8764, 8684, 8211, 17625, 23715, 12129, 19329, 24132, 21004, 9612, 6718, 3729, 21707, 20157, 17231, 2573, 10744, 22194, 24724, 18966, 18421, 1083, 21560, 24007, 13385, 23781, 20531, 13603, 16845, 4602, 24441, 7793, 25166, 25508, 20765, 13435, 22475, 8865, 22867, 821, 9759, 10362, 15837, 11902, 15707, 12478, 2743, 6934, 22360, 4889, 20316, 18188, 24970, 6061, 19464, 3760, 8817, 8191, 1425, 2078, 9543, 3977, 7768, 10600, 25018, 441, 24226, 4851, 707, 3824, 12258, 15470, 15573, 19287, 6291, 9056, 1736, 23593, 8206, 20205, 2577, 18749, 24421, 13808, 1313, 135, 6894, 5637, 21667, 21036, 25195, 6335, 6005, 19906, 18897, 15849, 10664, 3806, 22740, 13789, 1332, 18090, 14400, 10735, 2260, 18523, 9938, 23029, 5141, 23856, 8795, 18432, 14202, 17592, 6877, 4971, 14494, 19995, 19872, 8114, 12978, 21137, 18600, 7040, 20603, 19214, 24261, 12060, 15392, 2622, 13917, 19084, 19339, 12950, 6937, 21291, 19189, 21588, 3134, 10977, 5921, 17079, 1884, 681, 630, 8454, 2441, 20978, 16256, 18954, 4876, 24961, 16954, 22050, 19834, 15822, 2711, 15579, 22648, 11942, 16730, 19899, 9197, 84, 8671, 22696, 10063, 16236, 25341, 16559, 3481, 17847, 18493, 16681, 14164, 3618, 10462, 23337, 15363, 15474, 25075, 12374, 3356, 20250, 14966, 79, 22519, 2916, 23814, 10119, 2393, 8151, 10176, 11180, 20392, 25269, 1757, 3720 ]
reddit_dump_-methane-
[ [ "The thing is it's insanely hypocritical of *them* to claim that my playing a hero where I'm rusty with them is the primary reason we lost. There are so many mistakes made in any match of Dota, by all ten players, that all they're wanting to do is find an easy answer why they lost. This is exactly why people say shit like \"report Techies\", because they're too blind to see they made mistakes as well.", "806" ], [ "This is gonna sound like a stupid question but - can you block a target? For example, in Dota since it's isometric, you can obviously choose your target as long as you have the attack range. But in Smite, can you get in front of a god that is about to die and block the basic attack? Or do attacks pierce through gods? Or maybe ever god has a different way to basic attack???\n\nAnd is there actually any point to jumping with space bar?", "183" ], [ "I love me some Dota but I think I could get into this, too. Body blocking like that sounds like it could be the difference between a loss and a win. \n\nSo far my only REAL complaint is this: in Dota, I like clicking the minimap to check what items my teammates and enemies have, and their exact positioning, to determine if I should go and help them or if I'm better off letting them die so I don't feed them another kill. Is there any way to check up on everything like this in Smite?", "558" ], [ "OK hey, since you were so helpful earlier I'll ask you here something else. I've been going through the HUD editor and one by one disabling stuff that I think is, quite frankly, worthless clutter. \n\nI don't care about the accolades. The enemy/friendly deaths seem pretty redundant because of the kill message, ditto for the \"you've reached level 5!\" thing because you'll be told you level up even if you disable that. \n\nI might be wrong here, but I think the \"notifications\" element is also pointless because the announcer will tell you basically anything that will pop up here. \n\nGot rid of objective health, too, because it's already on the screen. (Might actually keep this one, though. Should I?)\n\nGot rid of surrender because I don't plan on surrendering - never had the option in Dota, why would I ever back down from a fight? :)\n\nSo, that leaves me with why I made this post. What, exactly, do \"Objectives\" and \"Upgrade Display\" do? \n\nObjectives says that it lists what buffs a camp will give you - but it doesn't seem to do that. Upgrade Display obviously shows what abilities and items you bought - but is that only for yourself? For example, in Dota, if someone buys an important teamfight item, like an aura, everyone will see who bought that item. Does that happen in Smite? Because if it doesn't, this seems like more clutter I'd just rather disable.", "924" ], [ "Oh. I'm used to Dota where if you mute their typing/voice chat that they can still use chat wheel and pings... well, that's a little conflicting. I'm still thinking I'll mute the toxic ones because, generally, if they're spending time flaming you in chat, they're not going to give anything helpful in terms of VGS, either. That's based on my experience with Dota, anyhow.", "439" ], [ "I think I'm adapting to the idea of Smite supports faster than I expected, because I *do* play a lot of Ogre Magi, probably the hero in Dota who gives the least amount of fucks about getting attacked in the early game.\n\nAnd the lack of TP scrolls might not be as weird as I thought, because a lot of heroes do seem to have insane mobility. What I like to do in Dota is TP to a low health teammate and turn around a gank - and <PERSON> can do that with her ult, pretty much. Same with <PERSON>. <PERSON> can kinda do this with her passive, though I'm not sure that she can be played as a support.", "354" ], [ "I think I'm actually going into Joust with the wrong mindset. I'm trying to choose a support like Athena to do the typical MOBA thing, when really it's meant to be (as far as I can tell) an all-out brawl like Arena mode, except there happens to be a lane. So I picked <PERSON> after googling which heroes are good for Joust, and I did just fine. \n\nSo, I see Joust as good mindless fun when I don't feel like supporting. But when I want to actually play support, I'll just go Conquest.", "410" ], [ "> It just means it's more important that your carry properly manage the wave\n\nThis is currently the part that stands out to me the most - I'm at a low MMR where it doesn't matter who's in the lane. Two carries, or I'm a support and there's a carry, or I'm a carry and there's a \"support\" - there is not any attempt at freezing the lane. There's constant autoattacking and then there's me making a desperate attempt to deny creeps. In that situation, is pulling a good thing to do?\n\n(Although maybe it's all cancelled out in the end, since the enemy is similarly autoattacking our wave)", "525" ], [ "Is there a list of all the gods that can be run as support who aren't guardians, or is the meta set in stone that generally they're the best? For example in Dota, while most supports are intelligence, my two favorites are Treant Protector and Vengeful Spirit, and they're strength and agility, respectively. \n\nI know warriors can sometimes be supports. What about mages, hunters, or assassins? Or are they generally too squishy to be the tank that Smite supports typically are meant to be?", "476" ], [ "OK, so if I want to focus on a small group of supports that are both fun and useful - would <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON> work out? I tried <PERSON> and <PERSON>, and honestly they seem to die too easily. Then there's <PERSON> who is supposed to be good but kinda bores me. Also <PERSON> is supposed to be pretty good for support, but he doesn't seem to have enough CC, probably totally wrong there, though.", "456" ], [ "As a Dota player slowly taking up Smite as a second game, this sounds all too familiar. I main support and if they decided to take some insane fight without me, I'm not going to teleport to die along with them.\n\nAnd I don't know if this is a good idea or not in Smite, but if I notice my carry overextending for no reason and getting himself killed two or three times in the early game, I'll just abandon that lane and go help out mid or offlane. Sure, he'll suffer even more and we may even lose a tower because of my rotation, but I would rather make sure whichever player is doing great can instead be doing excellent.", "345" ], [ "This is pretty refreshing to hear, that guardians can adapt their item choices. One of my favorite things to do as a support in Dota is determine with my limited gold which items are going to counter the enemy. Looking at Smite guides, you'd think guardians only ever build the same four items and MAYBE a couple situational items after that.", "924" ], [ "I'm the type of person who's played Dota for a year and content to play the same heroes over and over for simple reasons: Vengeful Spirit's swap is so satisfying to punish someone out of position, Crystal Maiden's global mana regen has a sneaky way of winning games, and Treant Protector's ability to heal towers is amazing. So I don't particularly care if a hero is one dimensional as long as they're fun.\n\nThe thing that does bother me about Smite is the static builds. I've only played Smite for a week, but I can see this turning me away from the game eventually. Counter building, as any role but especially support, is one of the most fun things to do in Dota. Yet consistently I've seen people say it's barely a thing in Smite. Hopefully season 4 with go towards adding possibilities. \n\nAlso there was a dev video where it was claimed they're trying to make it so any god can be played in any role... I don't know if that's empty hype or not. If it's true, I'm pretty excited.", "656" ], [ "Tbh I'm starting to think that's the truth... looking at <PERSON> Offlane builds, all of them build mobility/teamfight items that I'd build on a support. \n\nAnd especially at lower MMRs where people don't farm that well anyhow, where I'll always grab some farm even if I am support since the carries are off having an adventure.. I could probably really make use of an offlaner in the support role. :x", "829" ], [ "I don't think you've ever played this game. The majority of people have no interest in working together as a team. All they want to do is take to the keyboard and flame everyone else. I don't know why I ever uncheck \"mute all incoming chat\". There needs to be a way to strip the chat away entirely with a console command or something, because no one ever says anything useful.", "411" ], [ "I mean, sure it's a rant. People have reported me for other stupid reasons lately. I'll say \"Hey guys, I'm rusty on this hero so I'm gonna practice\" and if we happen to lose - then of course they'll say \"report this guy\" at the end of the match, looking to place the blame on someone else. People take unranked way too goddamned seriously.", "806" ], [ "But talents are often more like a \"free item\", as I've heard a few people describe it. You hit level 18, you know exactly what those skills are going to do. You hit level 20, how are you supposed to know if Dark Seer took +25 int or +12 str?\n\n... ok looking at most of these talents I've realized, as with a lot of 7.00 UI complaints, all they really need to do in most cases is let us see the fucking stats at all times again. wow.", "163" ], [ "Nice. I'm always the glutton for punishment in any online game (i.e. support), so of course I've been playing around with the guardians. Athena and Bacchus are so fun. <PERSON> has some great skills and his passive actually reminds me of Phoenix'x egg. Ymir's ice wall is so great for the tight spaces that Smite maps tend to have.\n\nStill can't get used to the whole idea that supports are tanks, though, since supports in Dota are typically squishy.", "300" ], [ "I can understand the idea. You want your work to remain pure from outside influence, that's why you get these one-man indie dev studios, or super controlling directors like <PERSON>, or whatever.\n\nThe problem is they're clearly not following their own guidelines. I know this because every other time the game is patched, something from the reddit front page is added.", "161" ], [ "Dragon Ball has two things going for it, the charming 80s art style and the fact that it doesn't take itself too seriously. By contrast, Naruto's art style looks too slick and its characters (from what little I've seen) kinda seem brooding and angsty. \n\nI might just go with your final suggestion of <PERSON>, since a couple others have also mentioned that one, not to mention it's one of those shows where I watched a little bit of it on Toonami as a kid and never finished it. Definitely going to watch more of <PERSON>, too. After that, I'll dig deeper into the more obscure series mentioned here.", "386" ], [ "> They come across Konoha being completely destroyed, hundreds of thousands dead and..break into a joke? The dude threw a rock earlier and he jokes about that rock accidentally smashing Konoha. Like, what? Haha genocide lol.\n\nWow, now I kinda want to watch Naurto just because this sounds like a train wreck. Is the comedy \"so bad it's good\" or is it just outright terrible?", "34" ], [ "The reason I give up, typically, is bad writing. I'll come across a book that's highly regarded... and there are simple, boring sentences everywhere. Or a bit of the opposite, where you can tell the writer is trying REALLY hard to show off. Writing that is either too simple or too grandiose really pulls me out of the experience, so <PERSON> and <PERSON> are equally annoying to me.", "505" ], [ "His writing screams \"look at me! look at me! I am incredibly witty!\" He's not at all transparent and it's annoying as fuck.\n\n[And look at this list where <PERSON> trashes basically every well-respected author.](_URL_0_) <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> - nothing is sacred to <PERSON>. He doesn't say this, but it seems to imply \"My work is FAR superior to these fools.\" Who does this asshole think he is?", "495" ], [ "I mean, I guess more than other writers, his themes are very apparently repeated from book to book. Within ten pages of <PERSON> I was like.. wait.. this just seems like a retelling of Pale Fire, without the cute poem and commentary. And the synopses of a few of his other books just seem like exercises in perfecting the <PERSON> story.", "1010" ], [ "Yeah, I've always been the type of nerd who loves to think about the meaning of novels but NOT when forced to do so by teachers. When they ask something like \"Why was this piece of clothing/furniture red or blue or green\", I'm always thinking who gives a fuck? On the other hand, I read literary criticism of my favorite authors like <PERSON> or <PERSON> just for fun. I feel like they always had more interesting and surprising insights than my teachers. \n\nedit: On that note, what's the most interesting lit crit available to read online? Do you have to be a university student to access it?", "721" ], [ "That's the problem, high school teachers tend to phrase their interpreations in such a way that they're the objectively correct ones. They don't even hint at the possibility that there are two, five, twenty, hundreds of other interpretations. I realize this is partially to simplify things, but I don't think they understand the damage this does for students. An opportunity to reignite (or begin) a love for reading is lost.\n\nA little story. My junior year teacher had us read one book a month for Accelerated Reader (idk if you've heard of it, it's pretty stupid, you can only read certain books that have a comprehension quiz attached to them.) I read <PERSON>'s The Sound and the Fury and <PERSON>'s To the Lighthouse back-to-back. Understandably, I would think, I was a little bit mentally exhausted. So after that, I decided I'd try <PERSON>' The Heart is a Lonely Hunter. But my teacher was like \"You know you're smarter than that, why don't you pick something else?\" Bitch, are you serious? If I didn't already love reading, I'd have probably been turned off from it for a long at that moment.\n\nI understand reading can and should be used for learning/enlightenment - and this is still my favorite use for it, part of why I'm so A.D.D. about what I read, can't easily find something that suits me - but it's also for entertainment. To put down the <PERSON> just because it's not as deep as <PERSON> or <PERSON> seems a little absurd to me, especially because it's still more substantial than plenty of other things I could be reading.", "1010" ], [ "> However, maybe try to focus on one book at the time, because sometimes the issue isn't the book itself but your attention span. Juggling several novels at the time could certainly reduce the pleasure and investment you can have in either of them.\n\n\nI think this is probably the biggest thing. I need to stop trying to read four books at the same time. \n\nAnd as for exhausting great books and then starting on good books, I've always more enjoyed the idea of just re-reading the great ones. If they're good enough for me to finish, it's almost always because they had to depth to them that I can appreciate even more on a second or third reading.", "721" ], [ "Skipped around the first 15 minutes and it's so choppy. Things begin with the scene where <PERSON> and <PERSON> are buying their house, years ago, interspersed with a couple shots of <PERSON> from season 5 looking at his vandalized house. I'll admit that was interesting and got my hopes up.\n\nBut the chronology is so strange. Immediately following is the \"chemistry is the study of change\" scene. Then you get <PERSON>'s cancer diagnosis, then the 50th birthday breakfast, then all of a sudden <PERSON> and <PERSON>'s party. And then a little after that, you get to see <PERSON> on his trip with <PERSON> to watch them bust a meth lab.\n\nIt just feels very disjointed, and not in an interesting <PERSON>-esque way.", "522" ], [ "> Writing is like music - it's a sign of good taste to be able to recognise the merit in lots of different styles.\n\n\nI know this sounds reasonable in theory, but I can't really abide by it in practice. With music, I can listen to pop music that is simply \"enjoyable\" instead of \"amazing\" because it's only 3 or 4 minutes long per song. With books, even an easy read is going to take hours of my time.", "635" ] ]
478
[ 17998, 334, 5634, 12766, 16115, 17403, 12463, 22822, 18158, 12460, 21803, 25012, 10308, 9461, 16692, 4831, 18035, 20676, 1248, 17863, 9982, 12316, 7650, 9778, 1547, 6873, 5177, 2735, 13100, 8706, 1145, 25266, 11589, 5325, 12277, 5552, 21539, 10034, 14535, 24247, 23065, 15831, 25460, 16322, 21175, 7897, 3712, 6601, 1367, 3057, 21617, 1623, 1189, 9360, 9585, 17974, 21329, 24288, 6717, 1389, 23414, 292, 18640, 24331, 6458, 11723, 5777, 16025, 10452, 678, 2918, 11660, 804, 10620, 23246, 3906, 855, 9321, 8261, 20787, 23167, 19989, 24369, 24421, 5495, 17342, 3922, 24260, 23099, 8609, 20143, 19365, 11169, 7013, 20364, 22296, 24700, 17665, 10847, 17444, 9344, 18887, 17071, 2624, 9685, 17599, 9789, 2843, 25364, 7798, 3864, 19846, 23268, 19209, 2172, 23155, 9222, 4161, 8751, 19675, 13779, 16479, 62, 17594, 23492, 2909, 12406, 5724, 8095, 10222, 9626, 19320, 6936, 3861, 14719, 24458, 24023, 3887, 6930, 14935, 3426, 9370, 4562, 15050, 19707, 1305, 13528, 1978, 20268, 11278, 12681, 11803, 22741, 8652, 24200, 197, 17876, 223, 9082, 7999, 2049, 7003, 7196, 1891, 10609, 19215, 7433, 20963, 15584, 14899, 20295, 11348, 17741, 19699, 23614, 676, 16029, 16722, 25541, 21108, 16926, 14348, 5333, 854, 18844, 19631, 6587, 1323, 12797, 24039, 8608, 11754, 38, 4494, 17717, 1261, 14798, 11594, 14133, 2176, 10062, 3120, 555, 6848, 9774, 10536, 617, 25131, 6718, 2707, 12719, 22743, 16493, 1124, 10153, 17677, 13731, 25418, 5793, 8127, 23353, 25198, 21523, 13748, 7527, 4894, 6137, 24116, 19392, 6405, 14084, 2401, 25511, 2356, 1454, 4535, 18346, 3156, 5934, 8773, 20026, 17077, 1411, 13070, 5329, 24481, 14662, 22282, 23547, 16096, 10658, 15672, 2738, 11337, 21325, 23665, 3809, 10359, 12942, 13445, 8969, 23297, 19083, 21529, 20668, 21744, 14519, 15847, 11440, 6921, 5572, 3255, 10162, 8682, 22117, 3760, 20171, 7739, 12131, 17498, 7294, 153, 405, 13611, 23344, 9726, 23767, 3435, 7894, 17962, 8398, 2089, 5642, 7859, 15630, 20234, 10107, 2544, 13094, 12734, 4663, 6880, 3273, 14632, 17583, 17423, 1413, 1748, 6395, 23774, 13252, 13936, 17784, 10842, 2800, 14702, 25163, 19106, 20324, 3757, 15653, 9614, 22440, 5398, 14481, 2261, 17621, 14768, 1694, 17653, 14059, 3810, 9890, 1371, 3616, 7247, 6986, 19834, 12626, 4564, 5138, 15918, 24007, 4487, 6391, 11016, 11551, 14244, 6367, 25420, 19196, 18282, 21014, 21884, 22924, 9773, 3558, 6420, 5553, 16619, 3073, 7723, 5753, 16978, 20603, 23420, 2057, 13763, 17536, 16435, 9621, 4267, 23672, 10848, 20493, 6734, 11625, 15019, 15853, 10465, 7755, 3259, 5119, 20854, 10094, 21936, 6723, 23036, 6709, 7657, 10470, 22669, 546, 11701, 9450, 1803, 24674, 12899, 15688, 23726, 3473, 22082, 10775, 18460, 12428, 19616, 7953, 19880, 9405, 15363, 23533, 11883, 22223, 5093, 7702, 5465, 25398, 7709, 23124, 2150, 5347, 13821, 23653, 25117, 21959, 813, 7185, 7070, 4076, 851, 12395, 16719, 9843, 1036, 15983, 1133, 8445, 6347, 7900, 11900, 22811, 4065, 4850, 9827, 18259, 5083, 1591, 16898, 14111, 468, 2833, 20974, 9191, 20376, 7769, 6154, 15254, 13140, 8916, 8995, 21229, 16615, 18653, 11038, 22458, 20621, 11338, 22071, 22953, 22589, 14823, 19268, 20568, 9282, 4302, 7253, 5857, 15375, 6403, 23874, 11468, 9488, 21434, 17777, 14181, 20882, 7664, 3334, 13006, 3462, 7759, 11012, 2933, 9634, 828, 3351, 19295, 9769, 6775 ]
reddit_dump_-mostlyharmless1
[ [ "Ok, so I was actually about 1/3 when I replied initially and I’m now fully in your camp. At the 1/2 mark I just put it down. The plot went from fun to trite and I found myself hoping for the imminent death of <PERSON>. \n\nYou’re right, The Martian wasn’t a masterpiece but with its structure it played to <PERSON>’s strengths. He is a really smart guy and in the Martian it didn’t seem like he was showing off, it fit. In Artemis he just beats you over he head with it. I just looked up the summary on Wikipedia after I’d decided to quit and saw plot wise I didn’t miss anything.", "148" ], [ "1. No, it was where one book ended and another began, why wait to move forward?\n\n2. He didn’t know anything about the ship or it’s crew, and his daughter was his focus after that. Lots of people died. He’s a botanist. \n\n3. Actors tend to be good looking. \n\n4. We could use an update but we haven’t seen <PERSON> either.", "311" ], [ "Well you’re in a sub with over 57,000 subscribers. \n\nThe show was cancelled and the fans renewal effort was unlike anything ever seen in TV, it got national media coverage. \n\nAnd if you like sci-fi you’ll like this show. It has great characters, starts with a great mystery, it’s as realistic as sci-fi can be, and it’s based off a great series of novels. \n\nAlso important is that the show, being based off the books, has an end in sight. They’re not making it up as they go along.", "60" ], [ "I forgot to add Archer Liquors in Garfield Ridge. I’ve never actually bought whiskey here but I used to live close by and the guy takes his beer seriously. He updates his page often to show what’s fresh. \n\nI decided to check his page out since I hadn’t in awhile and noticed he lists all his in stock bourbon. Stagg Jr. is on there at $57. A bit more than Kenwood but a worthy price for the bottle.", "885" ], [ "I don’t like it. Make bourbon like bourbon has been made forever. Give me that history in the bottle. Lots of shitty bourbons have the whole “made like my grandpa made it” marketing. But when you get a good bourbon that actually does that and you get the years of consistency behind it you’ve got me hooked. I like a little romance with my booze.", "830" ], [ "You really think <PERSON> just needed to be there and didn’t have a lot to do?\n\nThe first two seasons are about the building threat of the PM. <PERSON> is the guy that makes the universe wake up to the PM. Unfortunately for him he just riled up the key players and they all want it because it’s dangerous. \n\nAnd <PERSON> has done a great job with <PERSON>. He’s a character that always does what’s right which subsequently leads his life to go to shit. He’s got a great “this is a terrible thing happening” face.", "1007" ], [ "I just finished the third book yesterday. \n\nI read all three in a row and honestly I don’t recommend doing that. \n\nJDATE was fun and creative. The next books were sleds fun and the creativity turned to redundancy as I went along.I was growing bored by the end. They’re a bit redundant and eventually the jokes start to fall flat. \n\nHe really should have trimmed 50-100 pages of the second and third books. \n\nI still recommend them but with reservations now.", "1010" ], [ "That’s <PERSON>. Righteous to the point of exasperation. It’s also the reason <PERSON> is the captain and nobody else could be. Had it been someone without such strong convictions the crew of the Roci would have never stayed together. \n\n<PERSON> just wants to stay with his girl, but he’s comfortable doing so because he learned <PERSON> is on the right path, but he’s also willing to challenge him. \n\n<PERSON> was ready to end <PERSON> during his first broadcast, but as the events unfolded he learned that <PERSON> has what he lacks. <PERSON> could have the same level of happiness anywhere, but he finds a certain degree of comfort knowing that his talents will be used doing the right thing is he follows <PERSON>. \n\n<PERSON> is one-note and it’s why the story works. What you see in his progression is increased confidence in his actions. His moves would be the same no matter if he does so in a barely space worthy shuttle or the Roci. <PERSON> was getting a bit cocky, before the events of the last 2 episodes he was figuring it out, his surprise was a game changer which gives us peak “oh shit” face.", "1007" ], [ "I’m telling you these next 2 because you’re similar to me in loving a good mountain story. I have a mild obsession with Mount Everest and it’s history and love stories based around it. The caveat is these next 2 are not good. \n\n\nOn the more horror side of things you can check out Ararat by <PERSON> and The White Road by <PERSON>. \n\nArarat is just a mundane horror story without letting the setting add much, it’s probably the best part of the book but otherwise you’ll read it and immediately forget it. \n\n<PERSON> is an author I have a love hate relationship with. Her first book The Three had me gripped and freaked out for 3/4 of the book, then it fell apart. Her next book Day Four is based in the same universe and falls apart after 1/2 the book. The White Road was interesting for about 1/10 of the way. I keep reading her stuff because she had so much potential.", "540" ], [ "I never do when I grab a shoulder, I can’t imagine unless you were sold the wrong cut. Did you get it bone-in?\n\nHow about your rub? Maybe it was too salt heavy and drew out too much moisture? I’m throwing darts here. \n\nThe thing I learned after my first couple cooks with the anova was to be aggressive with seasoning. On my shoulders I rub at least 12 hours before cooking then reapply before going on the egg. But that’s not your issue.", "740" ], [ "I don’t agree. I love the world but when an author(s) tries to get too much out of a world it gets stale. Much like <PERSON> and Old Man’s War. The first 3 were fun but everything after wasn’t necessary. <PERSON> had the same issue with The Laundry Files. \n\nWe’re getting 9 books plus the novellas. I’m already looking forward to their next Trilogy because they’ve proven they can build a hell of a world and fill it with exciting and deep stories.", "1010" ] ]
224
[ 2307, 15806, 11927, 4616, 11775, 22477, 15911, 12972, 6618, 11648, 18967, 19625, 11898, 20044, 914, 23847, 3581, 25531, 21047, 7490, 14155, 23842, 18730, 11034, 1120, 12649, 17150, 25267, 11785, 18525, 15199, 20724, 1447, 4018, 24304, 19486, 25233, 10814, 1706, 10997, 13090, 5127, 15399, 22278, 21910, 6737, 815, 2286, 6030, 3645, 14069, 10590, 8294, 606, 3532, 13345, 5255, 9967, 17797, 586, 3969, 17130, 17173, 24336, 13644, 21482, 13248, 8866, 18243, 15625, 16934, 22643, 8320, 19064, 2323, 13220, 16092, 6255, 12689, 8203, 15203, 24097, 11287, 12075, 10978, 3277, 16950, 16083, 24690, 3280, 3237, 11638, 14916, 10969, 9698, 8496, 19655, 12980, 5363, 7335, 11875, 5862, 3641, 308, 20895, 14187, 13796, 6409, 7965, 12063, 24362, 10493, 17084, 1829, 349, 19773, 23010, 12957, 8165, 6945, 18550, 1715, 20822, 22321, 13926, 2764, 6250, 16516, 20242, 429, 11881, 24800, 2906, 4597, 17695, 18222, 18267, 20317, 21193, 25479, 4498, 22834, 11010, 18385, 11290, 24257, 18105, 15126, 23034, 3775, 565, 22007, 4815, 1215, 17087, 8662, 6313, 3826, 5501, 10174, 2997, 17402, 2778, 12426, 16694, 17287, 1018, 10105, 9521, 18791, 17951, 22273, 13724, 1396, 13334, 11086, 2582, 1982, 22432, 10999, 17719, 1399, 8531, 6217, 4863, 9275, 14229, 10532, 7654, 18680, 6311, 13147, 9723, 2845, 3093, 20736, 16848, 8698, 11202, 13487, 6346, 3063, 566, 1568, 12530, 24078, 19172, 7614, 9411, 11225, 4335, 17644, 2415, 17485, 8849, 189, 5487, 1082, 9434, 20078, 8484, 11683, 6772, 10394, 24520, 18380, 1271, 9357, 21408, 22873, 15987, 17847, 25168, 17680, 11408, 22638, 20595, 5696, 15369, 11138, 13916, 17090, 4987, 5577, 16421, 14373, 5189, 22674, 8109, 15851, 16882, 8935, 20243, 1139, 9162, 464, 21698, 495, 11557, 16168, 14129, 23971, 24455, 6786, 14325, 16985, 9374, 20725, 24408, 12138, 5163, 14289, 22591, 9960, 18796, 12900, 20940, 24476, 11499, 11181, 7491, 3814, 1482, 12641, 2546, 18054, 10510, 24783, 23494, 5921, 13577, 14273, 7919, 17241, 3743, 2889, 12850, 21502, 2581, 1921, 6762, 7530, 15091, 17556, 9696, 6696, 99, 12625, 241, 14560, 13477, 21905, 19710, 12763, 14514, 24453, 465, 5089, 8562, 2720, 16113, 5674, 21221, 13446, 2836, 16060, 22219, 19986, 16107, 25433, 21914, 22064, 6410, 14231, 10575, 20731, 20239, 16891, 4307, 16062, 3192, 6024, 4582, 12722, 8411, 17601, 10491, 9756, 9977, 7472, 7786, 6376, 10084, 23048, 10341, 14853, 462, 24144, 21802, 18342, 23452, 14025, 14457, 1187, 21510, 25265, 518, 447, 4847, 6315, 1334, 7415, 22677, 9213, 23936, 1849, 12084, 21236, 170, 25376, 2547, 6759, 625, 24584, 13435, 22662, 20577, 7655, 22846, 3505, 17334, 2623, 3803, 24635, 7145, 5539, 2358, 21655, 4623, 8313, 12007, 22769, 13587, 1137, 12011, 18702, 18564, 20727, 21340, 2891, 5451, 9509, 9038, 7059, 11706, 15096, 14210, 8772, 4293, 12785, 14559, 10526, 2204, 14618, 16534, 23400, 22509, 14307, 9377, 13396, 23052, 19580, 5570, 18215, 12723, 18570, 9673, 8336, 22459, 1936, 9599, 20139, 6542, 9371, 20132, 1402, 15855, 17500, 16469, 21669, 5943, 9856, 1439, 2294, 25176, 19643, 4625, 9312, 20975, 508, 20675, 8214, 20186, 196, 3222, 9349, 16248, 4515, 17333, 770, 14246, 18253, 16686, 6104, 20927, 22457, 15821, 16685, 20882, 14268, 8868, 19447, 9519, 3847, 18065, 23063, 20874, 12296, 13478, 4228, 13793, 22113, 12891, 6212, 22600, 8792, 2996, 23678, 6136 ]
reddit_dump_-music_maker-
[ [ "They Seydels and Suzukis in general are awesome instruments. Almost all my new harmonica purchases are from those two companies.\n\nMy specific favorites from Seydel are the 1847s and the Favorite with the Nobel covers, which is probably my current favorite harp in my favorite key - I just really like that one. I swapped out the reed plates at some point for 1847 plates, so it's basically an 1847 as well.\n\nOn the Suzuki side, I really like the Pure harps and the Manji. \n\nAlso, I still get a surprising amount of play out of my Lee Oskars. At they're price point, they're a fantastic value. \n\nThe Chromatic is also one of my favorites, but I only have the one so not much to compare it to.\n\nAs for avoid:\n\n- I don't really bother with Hohner any more. I don't play them nearly as much, and I don't really buy them any more. At some point, I will eventually try out the crossover and the thunderbird, but their overall lack of innovation at the lower price points turned me off to them years ago.\n\n- The Suzuki Folkmaster is a fairly crappy harp - but I bought it knowingly because I wanted something cheap to tinker with. But definitely not a professional quality instrument. Even still, I'd probably recommend a Blues Band for folks looking to tinker with something.", "424" ], [ "> I've only wired one.\n\nWell, there ya go. The first tree I wired probably sucked too. Since then, I've read books, watched videos, taken wiring workshops, and I've wired a ton of trees. And it still feels like a struggle some days.\n\nKeep at it - you'll get better. Feel free to post pics of your wiring to the beginner's thread if you want some critique and advice.\n\nThe big things are to use proper bonsai wire of the appropriate size, wire in 45 degree angles, and anchor branches to other branches wherever possible. Those are probably the three biggest things I see that most beginners need to work on.", "1006" ], [ "I keep seeing people say that crassula is no good for bonsai purposes, or that you can't do bonsai techniques with them, or that the bonsai you *can* do with them is somehow different than with other trees. \n\nI've been experimenting with these for years now, and I can tell you first-hand, these are myths. You can absolutely create miniaturized versions of these, and it's actually quite easy to do.\n\nFYI - there are [some jade tips](_URL_0_) in the wiki. \n\nOne update I need to make is that I've recently gotten very interesting ramification results by pruning multiple times a year instead of just once. One early summer pruning, and then one late fall/early winter pruning.\n\nAnd another ramification tip:\n\n- Prune branch back to a leaf pair where you want new branches to grow.\n\n- Wait for new branches to develop. \n\n- Once your branches have developed sufficiently, prune off the original pair of leaves that you cut back to, leaving just the two new branches.\n\n- Lather, rinse, repeat.", "408" ], [ "Did you hard prune it back just before you put it in the pot? What did it look like before? Birch can be very, very fussy about pruning like that. \n\nI think what /u/small_trunks was referring to is that this tree needs a lot of growing time to develop trunk and major branches. Assuming it recovers OK from the (presumed) hard pruning, this is the kind of thing I'd want to grow out in a much larger pot. \n\nHaving it in the small pot probably won't change much for this season (and there can be utility in keeping a tree constrained to a small pot for a season or two before scaling up), but I'd strongly consider up-potting each time the roots fill the pot to let it scale up over the next few seasons at least.", "408" ], [ "You owe it to yourself to get a copy of <PERSON> *Bonsai with Japanese Maples*. It will give you lots of idea for how to work with these. The JM eventually probably needs to be chopped down to one of those lower branches and the entire trunk re-grown. \n\nI'd make sure I set the roots in a good direction first, and then give it a season or two to grow. You might even be able to air layer and get a second tree out of that one.\n\n[Here's one of mine](_URL_0_) that I chopped and re-grew. If you read the threads in the stickied comment, it has the history going back to 2010 when I first chopped it. \n\nIt's actually due for a styling now, and I'll be posting an update after I do that work.", "408" ], [ "I can't say that I've done properly controlled scientific experiments or anything, but I do have a couple of birches, and one in particular that I've been working on for at least a few years now. The first season was a bit of a disaster, but I have learned how to work with them fairly well at this point.\n\nHere are some data points:\n\n- Root work seems irrelevant, but I've not done any truly major root-work on mine. Both are still in nursery pots, and I've done some light re-pots that do not in any way seem to impact growth. So, hard root work done in the same season as a chop could be a problem, but that's not what I've done. So yes, trunk/branch loss has been experienced without root work.\n\n- Die back tends to happen most often if you don't leave a completely viable branch behind so the tree has a reason to keep that pathway alive. Also, do NOT cut a branch back past the branch collar. Just these two things alone mitigates most problems you'd be likely to have.\n\n- If you cut back to a viable branch, but then decide to trim the viable branch back to a bud, you're likely to lose the entire thing.\n\n- I'm very hesitant about pruning back to anything other than a branch. Pruning back to buds sometimes works, but sometimes not in my experience. Even less likely to work if you don't seal your cuts, iirc. \n\n- I seal any larger cuts with cut paste.\n\n- You CAN prune these throughout the growing season, but it's best to keep the bigger cuts to earlier in the season. But I do occasional ramification pruning all season long. \n\n- As a general rule, I work these pretty slowly. Small amount of work, let the tree recover, small amount of work, let the tree recover, etc. \n\n- If you keep them lightly constrained to a canopy, you'll get much better and more predictable results than if you try to hard prune them each season. They do back-bud reasonably well under those circumstances. \n\n- This is one of those species where I'm far, far more likely to \"chase back the foliage\" over time than to chop and re-grow.\n\nWhen I get a few minutes, I'll create a birch section in the [species-specific section of the wiki](_URL_0_). If I think of any more tips in the meantime, I'll post them there.", "408" ], [ "I'm open to that in theory, but I only have two, and I have long-term plans for both of them that I'd like to see through first. And as-is, mine would cost a fortune to ship anyway. They're both in relatively large nursery pots and are not tiny trees.\n\nRiver birch is relatively common at nursery shops, though, so if I happen to see one that would be good for experimenting with, I can pick one up and we could swap with that. Or if I find a source of collectable ones, that could work too.", "408" ], [ "It's my understanding that the biochemical processes are identical regardless of tree size. A tree's a tree, after all.\n\n- Trees get bigger as they have the space and resources available to expand, and (importantly) the time to do so. \n\n- If they're constrained, they naturally stay at the size they're at and do the best they can to keep growing. The resulting growth size is often reduced as a result.\n\n- I can tell you from experience that the size of the available root space makes a massive difference in how much the plant can grow. This is why we so often tell people here to get their immature trees out of bonsai pots. They'll just stay small under those circumstances.\n\n- Similarly, if a tree is regularly pruned (as happens in nature with grazing animals or in our gardens with shears), the tree is similarly constrained and stays the size it is (or maybe more accurately, it remains at the scale it is at). \n\n- The combination of constraining the roots and constraining the foliage growth naturally lead to smaller and smaller branches being able to grow. A big part of that is that we stop the growth before it's allowed to grow and thicken the branch too much. That's an important detail, actually. Branches don't just thicken up as a result of existing. They thicken up as a result of smaller branches growing off of them and, the parent branch has to grow correspondingly bigger to support them.\n\n- If you're reducing the scale, you prune a branch, then new ones grow that you prune at a size that's smaller than the one they're growing off of, and so and and so on. Each new set of branches comes in smaller and smaller.\n\n- Over time, the tree has added enough wood to support all those extra layers of branches, and the trunk thickens up. But it happens very slowly this way.\n\n- But if you just ignore it and let it run for multiple years, or if you were to plant the tree in the ground and let it grow completely unrestricted, it would quickly revert to it's larger form.\n\n- Phytohormones most definitely play a significant role in how we develop our trees. Auxin and cytokinin in particular are worth a deeper dive. I see you have an article linked about that already, but that's an interesting area for study.\n\n- When you prune, you temporarily upset the balance of those hormones and the tree responds accordingly. This is why when we prune a branch, a back-budding response often is the result. You've temporarily removed a lot of the auxin that was keeping the inner buds at bay, and you get a flush of new growth.\n\n- There's a great article from Phoenix Bonsai Society called \"How Trees adapt and Respond\" that's worth reading. Unfortunately, the link is down, and I can't my link to the copy right now, but somebody here will probably see this and re-post it.\n\nHope this helps. You may want to read through [the wiki](_URL_1_) as well. Might be something in there you can use. I know what I've given you here isn't scientific articles, but hopefully it at least points you in the right direction as far as what functionally happens. \n\nAnother place you might ask is over at _URL_0_. That's also a very active community, and there's a good likelihood that some folks there will have some more resources to throw your way.\n\nAlso, /u/treehause, one of our other mods, might have something deeper to add on this topic. This kind of thing is usually right up his alley.", "833" ], [ "> I think the first step is gradually reducing the foliage to get everything closer to the trunk.\n\nThat's what I would do. There's enough foliage there that you should be able to build some semblance of a major branch structure and then just let it exist at that scale for a bit. \n\nDefinitely interesting material. I definitely wouldn't rush this one. You just want a nice canopy that frames that crazy trunk.", "408" ], [ "Yep, that's the article I was referring to. I'll try not to lose it this time. =)\n\n > some of the journal articles I linked seemed to indicate that stunting causes trees to change morphologically based on biochemical responses. Unfortunately, most of those articles are a decade or two old. \n\nSounds like you're ultimately trying to get at the answer of *why* the size reduction occurs from applying bonsai techniques. \n\nI've not seen much more than the kinds of things you've found, and I suspect most bonsai people probably know this stuff at a fairly high level. Anyone who's been doing this a while could describe for you in detail precisely *what* happens when performing certain techniques, but far fewer people are likely to know exactly what is happening at the biological level or why. Some almost certainly do, and somebody out there probably does this kind of research. Studies that investigate these mechanisms might not be directly related to bonsai though, which could make finding useful information a bit tricky. Definitely post this on bonsai nut. \n\n > kind of serious rules here : )\n\nJust FYI - the rules are primarily to prevent the front page filling from up with duplicate questions that are easily answered in the wiki or the beginner's thread, and secondarily to prevent people from complaining about that happening. ;-) Things like this are totally fine.", "833" ], [ "Man, what a narrow-minded point of view to say this isn't bonsai. \n\nMy definition of bonsai is practically identical to yours, so I find those kinds of pedantic arguments that try to narrow definitions baffling. You've got to be going for \"miniature tree\", but beyond that, I see no point in excluding various styles or philosophies because they doesn't meet the Japanese standard. That would necessarily exclude some wonderful additions and innovations to the art. But as somebody who also prefers more naturalistic trees, I'm clearly biased.\n\nBut that's kind of like a member of religion X saying that other religions aren't real religions because they're not religion X. Oh wait, I guess that kind of thing happens all the time. Apparently you've stumbled into a religious argument. =)\n\nPeople seem to forget that the people that made all this stuff up are/were just people, and that it's perfectly reasonable to adapt and improve over time. We do that in every other human endeavor - why not bonsai?\n\nSome people also often fail to appreciate the context in which certain things arise. Your example of Japanese nurserymen being businessmen first is spot on. Just because someone in Japan artificially narrowed the definition based on what they could sell, why should that limit the definition for all practitioners world-wide? And that's just one reason. Climate and availability of raw material is another. Are people only allowed to practice bonsai if they live in precisely the right climate to work on all the trees that the Japanese use? Hogwash.\n\nWe're applying the same techniques, and arriving at a practically identical end result, in many cases, an arguably *better* result. Perhaps they'd be happier if we started calling our trees *gaijin-bonsai*? Then again, come to think of it, I wouldn't be surprised if somebody already does. o_O\n\nFor me, above all else, the word \"bonsai\" represents the set of techniques we use to create and maintain a tree at a miniature scale. *How* one chooses to apply those techniques shouldn't dictate whether or not it is a bonsai, but rather the fact that you applied them to whatever material you were working on.\n\nHaters gonna hate, man ... keep doing what you do. =)", "709" ], [ "Like /u/small_trunks said, covering the drainage holes is a really bad idea. If you don't have easy access to bonsai mesh, you can get sheets of craft mesh at the craft store for super-cheap (like less than a dollar cheap), and cut it to whatever size you need. That's mostly what I use now since I discovered it. Essentially the same thing, and it's way cheaper than the stuff labeled \"bonsai\".\n\nAnd when you re-pot, *always* put a healthy layer of soil down first. Also, I would personally work this up to a larger pot size over time for development purposes, but this size is fine for now.", "408" ], [ "> \"River birch is a terrible bonsai subject\"\n\nI can see why someone would say that, because it takes years of working with them to figure them out, and they are in fact different in how they behave and respond to techniques. \n\nI'm somewhat convinced that most people abandon them because their standard bonsai techniques quickly result in failure and they give up. The jury's still out, but I've seen no evidence that I can't make nice miniature trees out of them given enough time.\n\nI never had the \"benefit\" of having someone old and wise tell me it couldn't be done, so I went and did it anyway. ;-)\n\nIn another 10 years or so, I should have a stronger opinion. Who knows, maybe I'll be right there with <PERSON> at that point. But my work on them to date has led me to believe that not only are the possible, but potentially quite beautiful.", "408" ], [ "That same roll would probably last most people a decade or two. =)\n\nEven the mesh sheets from the craft store was a huge improvement when I discovered them. I could probably also get a 3-year supply for the amount I would use at about the same price. \n\nThe bonsai-specific stuff is incredibly overpriced.\n\nEDIT: Case in point: [this <PERSON> stuff](_URL_0_) is the equivalent of about $1 worth of craft mesh (at full retail price!), and probably roughly what I'd use in a season where I did a lot of re-potting.\n\nSo $13 worth would probably buy me close to a decade's worth of mesh. lol", "885" ], [ "That's a good point about the particle size. This will be a fairly high-maintenance tree this way.\n\nfwiw, I've never had a problem using aluminum wire to anchor a tree. I usually use 1.5-2.0mm wire, and I crank the wire down nice and tight, then fill in very solidly with soil. I use two wires crossing over the root ball in two different directions whenever that's an option.\n\nOver time, the roots grow in and hold the entire thing solidly enough in place anyway. \n\nSo yeah, copper is technically better, but from a practical standpoint, I've never seen it turn into much of a real-world problem.\n\nAnd yeah, I would have put this in a pot 2-3x bigger. I wouldn't necessarily go much shallower, but definitely wider would be better long-term. It's fine for one year like this though.", "408" ], [ "Huh. Not sure I've ever even seen metal mesh used for bonsai purposes. I could imagine it probably gets completely corroded within a season or two unless it's SS. \n\nI don't really see what the advantage would be there. Especially since my biggest alternative use of plastic mesh is to protect branches from guy wires. I don't think I'd be comfortable using metal mesh for that purpose.", "304" ], [ "Are you just looking for a training pot to grow something out in? If so, no need for a fancy $400 pot for that. Mica pots are good and very durable, but there are definitely much cheaper options.\n\nDallas bonsai used to have some decent sized pots, but their training pot selection has seemed to dwindle year after year. Not sure what's up with that.\n\n[Kaizen Bonsai](_URL_0_) might have something you can use also, though you'd obviously have to pay international shipping to get it.\n\nIf you have a local bonsai shop, they might have something. My shop has all kinds of large plastic training pots for way, way less than $100.", "885" ], [ "Metromix 510 is what I use - it's literally the only soil I've seen that I would recommend as a component for bonsai soil. If I didn't have easy access to that, I'd just mix in regular pine bark.\n\nSave the MiracleGro soil for house plants, especially if you like fungus gnats. It always seems to come with them.\n\nAnd fwiw, the soil I mix in does have fairly small particle size overall, I just don't mix in so much of it that it causes any issues. 25-30% soil won't hurt anything assuming that the rest of your components balance it out. For me, the biggest consideration is drainage. If the soil drains quickly, it's generally getting a decent balance of water and air, and the roots get what they need. \n\nHaving all of the same particle size and 100% inorganic soil is a nice optimization, but trees can grow very well in other mixes. My trees grow strong and healthy each season in the 25-30% organic mix that I use, and my trees are overall lower maintenance as a result, which is the main reason why I use the mix that I do.", "408" ], [ "> Professionals don't use them.\n\nThat's not entirely true. \n\nThe mix I use is based on what they do at Bonsai West (local bonsai shop, been around for longer than I've been doing bonsai). \n\nThey mix roughly 25% MetroMix 510 into their soil, and they've probably potted thousands and thousands of trees in the stuff over the years. The rest is inorganic (turface & granite, mostly), but they're definitely mixing in potting soil. Granted, it's really nice, professional potting soil, but it's still potting soil. \n\nfwiw, though, it's the only potting I've seen so far that I would actually recommend for such purposes. There's a significant percentage of pine bark in it.", "408" ], [ "What /u/<PERSON> said. I'm also in zone 6, and all of my maples have been tucked away leafless since November or so. If this has been inside the entire winter, that's the problem. These require dormancy. \n\nAt this point, there's not much you can do other than wait until freezing temperatures end and then put it outside. This will definitely need a solid season of outdoor growth followed by proper dormancy to get it back on track. Japanese maples absolutely cannot live indoors.\n\nAlso, as MD_bonsai mentioned, [tree health and identification questions belong in the weekly beginner's thread](_URL_1_). We get tons of questions like this, so the beginner's thread keeps the front page from having lots of duplicate questions. Plus, [it gets archived](_URL_0_) so future people can learn from it.\n\nI'm going to close out this thread now since I think you got your answer, but if you have any follow-up questions, feel free to post them there.", "408" ], [ "They're just different. The best ones look like miniature versions of full-size jade trees. Go figure. ;-)\n\nI mostly have them as house plants, but they're a lot of fun to mess around with, and I've been doing all kinds of bonsai experiments on them in recent years. \n\nMy favorite bonsai species are definitely things like maple, elm, and hornbeam, but there's no harm in branching out. Just one of many species I play around with.", "408" ], [ "> There are plenty of great bonsai pics around using this species so why any would doubt is astounding.\n\nI don't know, but I see it all the time.\n\n > Curious about your project though- is the large leaf from the same period of growth?\n\nNot exactly. That one was from a cutting I took over the summer. I was mainly just trying to show what can be achieved through timing the pruning correctly, and the leaf size that yields. If you don't prune them back to ramify like this, they put out much larger leaves on the non-ramified branch, even during the winter. \n\n > I'd expect weaker and perhaps smaller growth on a plant indoors for the winter. Curious how reduction goes during the growing season outdoors\n\nThat's pretty accurate. The trick *seems* to be to develop branches during the outdoor growing season, and then work on reduction during the winter. \n\n- The leaves do get bigger over time, but you can keep them small for quite a while by keeping them regularly pruned. If you ignore them for too long, they do go back to growing big leaves and branches again so you have to keep up with it throughout the year. The important thing is keeping everything to scale.\n\n- If I wait until those tiny new leaves come in a bit more, and then prune them again, the smaller leaf size stays locked in place for a while.\n\n- You can definitely choose when you prune them in order to achieve a particular result. Regulation of light and timing of pruning seems to really be key for these. \n\n- If you consistently and regularly prune back all new growth before it gets bigger than you want, you get finer ramification as well as inner growth. But if you prune at just the *right* time, you do get smaller leaves and branches. \n\n- I'm going to play around more with some defoliation techniques on a couple of them over the summer and see what I can do with that. Also, I'm going to do some more controlled experiments between full sunlight and shade while they're outside. I'm starting to think that lower outdoor light may yield better results, but I need to confirm. \n\n- I suspect they're likely one of those species where you get the once a year money shot if you prune the whole thing at once, and then the leaves start to get bigger again. But plenty of regular trees are like that too, so I don't see that as a huge issue if that's the case.\n\nI've been working with these for a long time, but it's only been relatively recently that I've started piecing a lot of this together into a unified technique, if that makes sense. My results have gotten significantly better in the past couple seasons as a result, and I'm pretty sure I can at some point have trees with canopies full of those tiny leaves, at least long enough to take a good photo each year.", "408" ], [ "Yeah, they seem to respond well to everything but over-watering and freezing temperatures. =)\n\nEvery pruning technique I've ever tried just seems to yield something better as a result.\n\nI'm going to put some of them through the full defoliation treatment this summer and see how that goes. I have a bunch of them, so I'll probably experiment with doing it at different times and in different lighting to see if the results vary at all.", "408" ], [ "Interesting. \n\nI'm going to try something similar, but I want to see the difference between putting them in full sun vs. in the shade after defoliation. I also want to see how the results vary if I acclimate them first, and then defoliate mid-summer. \n\nI rooted a ton of them last season as I pruned, so I have no shortage of material to experiment with at this point. I'm going to need to find homes for some of them eventually. As you probably know, it's easy to get overrun with jade if you propagate the cuttings.", "408" ], [ "It's a clean design, but that doesn't really represent how deciduous trees grow, and you'll be fighting with it every year to keep it looking like a pine tree. \n\nIf this were to show up on my doorstep, I would add more movement to all those branches, and ultimately, get them all pointing upwards, and I'd up-pot into a larger training pot. \n\nI would spend probably the next 3-5 years developing a canopy using these initial primary branches as the \"frame\" to grow everything else off of. Mostly, that would just be an excuse to grow it out and thicken up the trunk, though.\n\nIf, somewhere along the way, I decided that wasn't going to work well, I'd let the thing run to thicken up the base, and then chop it way back and re-grow the trunk and major branches from scratch. \n\nThe base is a decent start, and it will at some point make a nice tree. $15 was a good deal, and I would have paid more than that just to be able to eventually chop it. \n\nUltimately, though, as long as your happy with it, it's your tree! =)", "408" ], [ "I'm kind of contrarian, so take what I'm about to tell you with a grain of salt.\n\nToo much organic soil, or too many fine particles in your soil mix can definitely clog it up and cause problems. \n\nThat said, as long as the ratio of fine:larger particles overwhelmingly favors larger particles (75-80% larger particles), then I've not found it to be a problem at all to have smaller particles floating around in the mix. \n\nIn fact, having a bunch of smaller organic particles helps to retain a little bit of extra moisture and makes my trees lower maintenance overall. They still can handle daily watering and frequent fertilizing, but they can also go a bit longer without watering than trees in 100% inorganic substrate. That's the primary reason I do it.\n\nBut I also tend to pull the root ball once a year and clean it up, shake off the loose soil, and re-pot with fresh soil. Some trees I'll let go an extra year, but I don't usually go much more than that unless I have a reason to. I'm not talking major re-potting here, but light touch work. I don't even really count it towards my 1 insult per year. That way, I get to freshen the soil and also make sure the roots are doing what I want them to. \n\nBut many people would probably say that what I'm doing won't work for a whole host of reasons, or that their preferred way works better for X, Y, or Z reasons. But I think my trees speak for themselves, and demonstrate that the mix is at least reasonable. \n\nMore than one way to skin a cat, and all ...\n\nEDIT: And especially for a grow bed - the ground works differently than a pot. Any additional drainage is a plus, but not as necessary as it is in a pot.", "408" ], [ "Go outside and look at every deciduous tree you can find. Try to find even one that's predominantly growing like yours is. I'm guessing you'll find it difficult to do so.\n\nDeciduous trees point their branches up towards the sun as they grow and *then* they get weighted downward over time. But even then, the new growth will continue to point upwards to the sun. It creates a completely different type of canopy.\n\nEven if you are going with an informal upright style like you have here, it manifests differently on a deciduous tree than on a conifer.\n\nYou might be able to make this work with the main branches you have here, but you need scale it up a bit to get the proportions and scale correct. That's probably a 4-5 year project to frame out the canopy, and another 5-8 years of refinement from there. And if it doesn't back-bud where you want, you could end up with some sparse areas.\n\nOr, you could just chop it way back and re-grow everything, and you'd probably get a workable, but smaller tree sooner.\n\nIf I get some time later tonight, I'll play around with it in photoshop and show you what I mean.", "408" ], [ "No, just make sure you get solid core wire, and you'll want a set in the various gauges. You don't just want one size of wire. For copper, you want to use a wire that is roughly 1/4 the size of the branch you are wiring.\n\nAlso, when annealing, be sure to evenly heat your wire so that it is evenly annealed throughout or you'll get inconsistent results.\n\nI haven't done this myself, but last I checked there are numerous youtube videos on the topic.", "542" ], [ "Quick question - assuming this is an evergreen azalea ... I normally would avoid pruning off all foliage from evergreen branches at all costs. I've learned this the hard way on numerous species over the years. \n\nAre there any other obvious evergreen species (broadleaf or otherwise) off the top of your head that can handle this level of pruning? Ilex crenata is the one that immediately comes to mind that I'm most curious about, but would love to hear of any others that you might have seen.\n\nOr is this actually a deciduous azalea and I'm making an incorrect assumption here?", "408" ], [ "Nope - I actually use aluminum wire most of the time. Haven't used copper in years. I just happen to know a bit about annealing. \n\nPast few times I just ordered my wire off of Amazon - last time was 1kg rolls from Dallas bonsai, iirc. Haven't checked pricing since last year, so ymmv as to whether that's still a good deal.\n\nThere are some folks here who have decent sources of copper wire, though it is definitely bonsai-specific wire. I believe /u/ZeroJoke has a source for copper wire in the states that he likes. I just can't remember who it is off the top of my head.", "885" ], [ "> I think that basically all azaleas are deciduous depending on climate\n\nOh! I was not aware of that. I picked up a Weston's popsicle azalea a couple of seasons ago, and it is the first I had seen that was obviously deciduous. Cool, that significantly changes some assumptions I had been making. \n\nThe WPA still has a season of recovery before I beat on it (it wasn't potted properly when I bought it), but that completely changes my long-term plan for that one.", "408" ], [ "The roots themselves are fantastic - very strong, healthy tree. The nebari needs a lot of work, but will develop as I develop the branches, especially the way I just potted it (shallower pot, room to stretch out).\n\nThe trunk is definitely substantial, and will serve as a solid foundation for some gnarly branches. My main rationale behind getting this one was that it had a trunk that I could potentially do some carving on somewhere down the line, and a *ton* of possible branches ready to go.\n\nIt's a very long-term project, but I think it has potential to be something really nice.", "408" ], [ "Yes, it's always satisfying to pull out a solid root ball full of roots. Shows me that the tree is happy, and makes the root ball reduction a lot easier.\n\nIn non-root work years, I still pull the root ball and do some light combing out and trimming, sometimes even pull the root ball in maybe an inch or so all the way around. \n\nAfter 2-3 years of that, you generally end up with a pretty workable root ball with a ton of feeder roots, and at that point, there's usually no question that it can take a fair amount of reduction if it's time for that.", "408" ], [ "It will be fine in that larger pot with regular soil. It would be preferably to use bonsai soil, but do what you gotta do. \n\nI wouldn't rush to get another bonsai pot, either. It will probably turn into a much nicer tree if you leave it in a bigger pot for half a decade or so (these grow slowly).\n\nIf you don't disturb the roots too much, you can re-pot with better soil later in the season (sooner is better, obviously, but if you're really gentle with the roots, it should be fine).\n\nThe most important thing is don't let it dry out. That will kill it.\n\nAlso, for future reference, plant health, ID, and troubleshooting questions belong in [the weekly beginner's thread](_URL_2_). We get lots of similar questions, so it helps to keep them all in one place, plus the beginner's thread questions [get archived for others to learn from](_URL_1_).\n\nI'm going to close out this thread since you got your answer, but feel free to hit us up in the weekly beginner's thread with any follow-up questions. Also, I would recommend [reading the wiki](_URL_0_) if you haven't already. \n\nCheers,\n\n~MM", "408" ], [ "There's some [jade info in the species-specific section of the wiki](_URL_0_). There's also some sprinkled throughout [the rest of the wiki](_URL_2_) as well.\n\nAlso, [here's something I posted](_URL_1_) about one of mine.\n\nThe short answer for pot size is \"it depends on what scale you want your jade at\". With these, you let them run until they get really top heavy, then chop back. Then let them grow again and repeat the process. \n\nJust about any cut above a node will reliably generate new branches, especially if you make the cut mid-summer and the jade is growing outdoors. And almost anything you cut off will root just by sticking it in bonsai soil.\n\nIf you have any further questions, please hit us up in the weekly beginner's thread. It helps to keep the basic questions like this all in one place, and the answers there are archived for others to learn from. \n\nI grow lots of these, so happy to help out.\n\nCheers,\n\n~MM", "408" ], [ "There's definitely a time and place for copper, but yeah, aluminum is a great all-around performer. I straighten and re-use it as well, even the scraps can be useful for things. \n\nIf I were wiring a tree that was to be shown in that state, I'd almost certainly use copper. Or if I knew I was going to leave the wire on for a very long time (like with certain slow-growing conifers), and I wanted to be sure that the branch didn't move, I might consider it for that too.", "304" ], [ "It's a juniper. I would recommend that you read the [beginner's walkthrough in the wiki](_URL_3_) to get started.\n\nHere's [one of mine from 2010-2014](_URL_0_), and an [update that covers 2015-2017](_URL_2_). That should give you a sense for how they grow. \n\nAlso, for future reference, plant health, ID, and troubleshooting questions belong in [the weekly beginner's thread](_URL_1_). We get lots of similar questions, so it helps to keep them all in one place, plus the beginner's thread questions [get archived for others to learn from](_URL_4_).\n\nI'm going to close out this thread since I've answered your questions, but feel free to hit us up in the weekly beginner's thread with any follow-up questions. \n\nCheers,\n\n~MM", "408" ], [ "They're usually pot-bound when you get them. I find it's useful to remove it from the pot, lightly comb out the perimeter of the root ball, maybe trim it up a bit and then either put it back in the original pot or maybe up-pot one size. So yes, but don't just leave it in its original state - root bound plants are generally not happy plants.\n\nWhat I *don't* do with brand new stock usually is radically reduce the root mass. Unless the trunk is already where you want it, that's often completely counter-productive. I usually give it a few seasons of fairly unrestricted, but balanced growth (I'll hedge prune back to the canopy about once per season) with a lightly cleaned up root ball each season.\n\nBut doing this, you end up with much better raw stock than what you paid for. The only downside is you can end up sitting on new material for 3-5 years before doing major work on it.", "408" ], [ "> 2) I don't really know if I'm cut out for bonsai in general. All the videos that I watch or books that I read talk about the greater plans for a tree 1,3,5,7,12 or more years down the line. I don't know if I'm able to think that far ahead, it feels like chess (which I'm also not very good at), how I need to plan 5 moves ahead and have 10 of those plans so that I can adjust as the game develops. Am I overthinking the design process? or is it really that complicated? Is it possible to have ok-good level bonsai if I just take it season to season with no real plan.\n\nHere's a strategy. \n\n- Each season, make every branch look as good as you know how to make it. \n- Pay careful attention to how each tree grows. \n- Experiment with new techniques on parts of the tree that you are pretty certain you don't need, or on material you don't care too much about. \n- After a while, you'll start to get a sense for how the tree is going to respond when you take actions.\n\nIt's really just a time and experience game. It seems daunting to think ahead because what happens next is still a mystery to you. The more you work on trees and see how they respond, the more confident you will be with how they will respond to certain things.\n\nStick with it - in about 10 years, you'll be dispensing this same advice to somebody else. =)", "408" ], [ "The point isn't to discourage people from playing. Not at all.\n\nThis is just something we decided to try - if it radically reduces the number of entries, then we can consider moving back to how it was before.\n\nPlease don't make it into an elitism thing - it's definitely not that. If that were the case, we'd set the limit to $300, or make it unlimited or something. It's simply because in some urban areas, $50 buys you a whole lot less than it does in other places, and a $25 bump seemed reasonable.\n\nYou do make a good point that beginners may not be ready to spend $75, which is valid. I'll be paying close attention to how it plays out. \n\nAnd like <PERSON> said, we actually had way more than 12 to start last time - some never got around to buying a tree, and some killed their tree early and dropped out. 12 was just what we ended up with at the end.", "835" ], [ "$20 isn't even that bad a price by Massachusetts standards. I see almost the exact same trees sell up here for $60-80+. At $20, it's a cheap starter tree at an affordable price. \n\nAt $60-80+, I kind of want to rage flip the table their sitting on. Especially lately, they've been particularly skimpy rooted cuttings. Probably about $3 worth of material max. \n\nIt's like the ultimate caveat emptor game - around here, you could drive down the street to Home Depot and get at least 10x the juniper for under $20. But you'd have to know that already.\n\nI'm not opposed to the mallsai concept quite as much as I'm opposed to the scaminess involved.", "885" ], [ "Not sure exactly - my record with cuttings is kind of hit or miss, and I've actually never tried a JPN. If I were to guess, though they probably root the first season, and establish the second, and then they sell them after that. But that's just a guess. \n\nAnd they're probably rooting thousands of new ones every year so there's always new ones to sell each year, regardless of how long it takes.", "567" ], [ "I tend to just let mine grow, and when it's looking nice and strong, I take the shears to it. On the one I have, I've tend to take off about 25-30% at a time when I prune. I've had it about 3 years, and I've pruned it twice - once after I got it, and once again last week. \n\nI'm just slowly chipping away at it. New growth will make it bushier, but that's giving you more options to work with later. It can probably take more pruning than what I've done, but I prefer to just chip away a little at a time. For me, that's at least as much because I have many other trees to work on and the rough cut only took about 10 minutes.\n\nWhen I prune, I take a few good whacks off the top, then balance out the rest of the branches by shortening them a bit. On their own, they sometimes die back quite a bit, but they also backbud on their own very aggressively, so the result is usually just that the tree becomes more interesting. \n\nNow is a reasonable time to prune them in the northern hemisphere. \n\nAfter you watch it grow and respond to pruning for 2-3 years, you'll get a better sense for them. You could probably work them faster than I have too, mine are just long-term back burner projects.\n\nEDIT: I would definitely take treehause's ID over mine. That said, I don't see any reason why it would need to be treated radically different than a thuja though.", "408" ], [ "It does make a certain amount of sense since you can do early pruning on other things like maples. But there the thing you're trimming is clearly separate from what's left behind. With larch, you're trusting that the juvenile foliage will respond positively after you remove a piece of it. \n\nFrom what I'm seeing here, it sounds like it will, which as I said above, is kind of a game changer for me. I have a couple larches that are approaching phases where this will be interesting.", "408" ], [ "Do it in stages so you can understand how the tree will respond before making the final chop. When I get new species, I always chop high the first time so that I know what to expect. Plus, it redirects growth to lower branches, so that can be a good first step in any case. \n\nFor the first few years after I get new material, I'll often just lightly constrain growth occasionally while letting it fill in overall. After 3-4 years of that, I usually end up with *much* better pre-bonsai material than what I paid for. Gradually shortening trunk and branches and then mostly just letting it grow each year is how I do that.", "408" ], [ "Leave them alone. Get more trees. =)\n\nI like that juniper the best - nice structure, clear apex. It just needs to grow in, I wouldn't prune this one at all until *at least* next season sometime.\n\nTwo of your other trees needed an apex the last we saw them (the larch and the blackthorn). It looks like they're growing out of that, but I would be sure to preserve that the next time you do structural work. Credible trees have an apex.", "408" ], [ "For now they mostly just need to grow. The larches and willow leaf ficus are the farthest along - the rest *really* need some unrestricted growth in order to develop trunks. \n\nWatch them all grow for the season to start to get a sense for how they grow and develop. Also, I'd at least put that ginkgo in the ground for sure - they can take a long time to thicken up, even in the ground.", "408" ], [ "> So can I trim during a growing period, or is that wrong?\n\nIn general, yes. But don't over-prune. When I work on things at the stage yours is at, I generally wire the branches, then only prune back lightly when things start to become dominant. And even then, I just shorten and gradually work the branching back with generous periods of growth between pruning. \n\nSo more growth than pruning, and the stronger you get the tree before pruning, the stronger the back budding response when you do, and the thicker the trunk can become during that period of growth.", "408" ], [ "Probably a bit of sunburn. I put mine outside into shade first, let them acclimate, and then gradually give them more sunlight. If you put them straight out, they almost always get burned. \n\nThe good news: they are practically impossible to kill as long as you don't over-water them or freeze them. Water thoroughly, then let it dry all the way out, then water thoroughly again. Repeat that cycle and it should recover in time. If it's sunburned, the damage is already done, so probably no point in changing the location now. The burnt leaves will gradually be replaced.", "408" ], [ "> Most posts in the beginners superthreads get zero response from what I've seen.\n\nNot sure how closely you've looked at our weekly beginner's threads, but that's really not true at all. Tons of questions get answered in the beginner's thread every week, and a number of experienced people spend a lot of time in there. \n\nSome do occasionally get missed, but most do get answered. There are hundreds of comments, and lots of back and forth in the threads each week.", "620" ], [ "Be careful not to over-prune. It arguably didn't need pruning between the first and second photo. My rationale is that in photo 1, everything is already to scale. It looks like a tree you might see on the street. Cutting back hard at that point is kind of counter-productive.\n\nI would have just wired some motion into the branches and let it get it's full spring flush. Then, around mid-June or so, lightly prune back new growth to 1-2 leaves each. Then let it run again for the rest of the season, only pruning if something was becoming too thick for the design. \n\nThen, the following spring you'd have 3-4 times as many branches to work with. At that point, you shorten the dominant branches back to the canopy and repeat the process. \n\nYou can still do this, just start from where you are now. If you hard prune every year, trees can start to lose their vigor. Everything must grow or die.\n\nNice trunk, btw. I hope to see more pics in the future.", "408" ], [ "fwiw, there are some exception to the \"don't prune indoors during winter\" rule. \n\n- Crassula doesn't stop growing as long as it's getting reasonable light and the temps are high enough. If you're trying to ramify them, and you don't do it during winter, they may outgrow the scale you were going for. Took me a *long* time to figure this out. I'm talking light, strategic pruning though, nothing crazy.\n\n- For ficus microcarpa, they have a tendency to drop leaves throughout the winter when they're inside, starting with the inner ones closest to the trunk. You can mitigate this somewhat by pruning back the tips of the branches that become dominant during winter. Nothing major, and I don't prune back unless I can prune back to a self-sustaining branch. But it helps keep the tree in balance so that you're not completely starting from scratch filling in leggy branches in the spring.\n\nIt's a good general rule, but it helps to know your trees and what they can handle.", "408" ], [ "If your tree is awake and growing (post a pic and we can help you decide), it's fine indoors for another couple months. In fact, if it's awake and growing, putting it outside now could kill it. A lot of people will give you a knee jerk \"outside!\" comment, but only dormant trees can survive outside for any length of time in sub-zero temps, and they need to gradually acclimate to the cold in the fall.\n\nBut as soon as the weather is nice, you need to put it outside and then leave it there for good. They do need to go dormant or they will eventually die. \n\nAlso, don't ever let it dry all the way out or you'll probably kill it, and make sure it has as much sun as you can give it.", "408" ], [ "Ok, I'll let you know as it gets closer. There are a number of people in our area on here, so we should at least be able to get a small group together. I always go regardless, but it would probably be more fun as a group project.\n\nI typically go on the weekends, but with a bit of notice, just about anything is possible. Right now I'm thinking early to mid April, but winter sometimes dictates timing for us.", "273" ], [ "Depends on what work you plan on doing. I wire most of my trees into shallow pots, but some I don't bother with. \n\nMy little seiju, for example, isn't wired in - the root ball fits firmly into the pot, and it doesn't budge. It's a clip & grow tree, so it's not getting jostled around at all. \n\nIt wasn't wired when I got it, and I kept it that way when I re-potted. The pot's tiny, and it doesn't have wire holes, so any kind of wiring would be ugly as hell. So that one's an exception.\n\nAs a general rule you should wire into the pot, but there definitely can be exceptions here and there. The larger the tree, though, the more likely I'd be to wire it in. Really depends on the circumstances ...", "408" ], [ "I tend to go with a bit more organics than other folks, but I still stop around 20-25% pine bark max. \n\nToo much organic material causes problems.\n\nIt retains *too* much moisture, and on top of that, it's hydro-phobic when it's dry. That combo tends to lead to inconsistent water ing, and the tree's either too wet or too dry at any given time. \n\nNow, mix it in with some other components, and you have some decent soil.", "408" ], [ "You're not using mulch here, you use the finer stuff. And drainage is so much better if you mix in other components. You don't want pine bark as your primary ingredient for this purpose. It might technically work, but trust me, it will be way too easy to screw up the watering.\n\nThese are well explored things ... unless you're really keen on experimenting, I would stick to the recommended soils as described in the wiki.", "408" ], [ "I probably would have developed it in a larger training pot for at least a few seasons to develop the trunk a bit, but I tend to take that approach with most things. \n\nThis will obviously work, and it looks nice, but I've noticed that hornbeams seem to grow especially slowly in small pots.\n\nI really like the pot, though, and I do like how it looks in it. Looking forward to seeing this one progress.", "408" ], [ "You can certainly grow a tree in a rock, but the right way to do it is to use something more established. I've seen people use small junipers for this kind of thing quite often.\n\nApple trees need to be bigger to work as a miniature (crabapple works better), and you don't grow a tree from scratch in such a small \"pot\" anyway. I mean, you could start it there, but you'd need to transplant it to something bigger fairly quickly, so there's not much point.\n\nI would recommend that you read the wiki. Lots of info on developing trees in there. If you have follow up questions, please post them to the weekly beginner's thread.", "408" ], [ "Check out the [Additional Resources](_URL_0_) section of the wiki. In addition to the direct references, there are some threads on books in there.\n\nOne of the most eye-opening books for me was *Bonsai with Japanese Maples* by <PERSON>. It's obviously species-specific, but it's one of the few books I have that shows how to build a trunk from scratch, and most of the techniques can be applied to other deciduous species without much modification.\n\n*Bonsai Life Histories* by <PERSON> was also very enlightening, although that one hasn't aged quite as well for me. \n\nI remember when I first read it, I was amazed at being able to see so many trees being refined over decent chunks of time, but now I go back and the \"finished\" trees that I thought were impressive back then mostly just look like intermediate-level trees to me. Still, it was a useful mindset shift at the time, and I would still recommend it highly for people starting out. One of the biggest gaps most beginners face is have never seen a tree grow and develop over multiple years, and it helps with that.\n\nAnd +1 for Naka's Bonsai Techniques I & II. There's some dated info in there, but there's still a tremendous amount of useful reference info all in one place.", "540" ], [ "Agreed. \n\nIf one doesn't have bonsai experience before attempting it, they're a lot less likely to take the appropriate actions along the way to increase the odds of getting something usable for bonsai purposes. \n\nJust growing a tree from seed really isn't the same thing. I'm not anti-seed so much as I am pro-learning how to develop bonsai correctly. \n\nPeople really need to learn how to work with mature material first so they have some idea what path they need to take those seedlings down in the first place.", "408" ], [ "For that seiju:\n\n- If you want those branches to thicken up any time soon, you'll probably need to put it in a bigger pot. \n\n- Also, I'd let it run until early/mid-summer, and then lightly hedge prune back to roughly this canopy. If you do that a few seasons in a row, you'll probably get new branches in other places on that main trunk, plus you'll just have a lot more to work with.\n\n- I could almost see this becoming 2 trees, if you could air layer off the trunk just above that first branch, that top would make a decent tree on its own. The base that remains would make a decent start to a new trunk. Just a thought ... it's pretty unique as is, though, and will look more natural if you get a few more branches in the right places.\n\n- You could also chop it back and re-grow the trunk to build taper. You'd be signing up for a fairly long-term project, though.", "408" ], [ "[<PERSON> talks about it a lot](_URL_0_).\n\nEssentially, you let the tree grow out in a fairly balanced way, and then about once a season, you prune it back to a relatively set distance from the trunk. It's like giving the tree a hair cut.\n\nI tend to prune back the most dominant branches in spring (around now), then let everything grow until early-mid summer, then hedge prune it back to a canopy that still looks like a tree (as opposed to hard pruning and hacking the hell out of it).\n\nBy doing this, you accomplish a few things:\n\n- You start to develop ramification\n- You allow sufficient growth to add some character to the trunk \n- You let the tree get nice and strong \n- You are able to trigger a bunch of inner growth that fills in after the summer pruning (ie, you maximize the effects of auxin/cytokinin)\n- This method creates very natural looking trees in relatively short time frames", "408" ], [ "> I think a bonsai tree that's not yours can be a calming, serene sight - but if you're the one cultivating & caring for the tree, which you are, you're essentially putting a project in front of you in a spot whose very nature is for you to tune-out and focus on nothing - to me, putting one of my bonsai on the table that's near where I meditate (when doing sit-down meditation) would be akin to putting a BMX hub on the table, it's a project I'm working on and it would be the hallmark of distraction, 100% antithetical to meditation!\n\nI actually couldn't disagree more with this. \n\n- a) If you can't look at your tree without seeing a project, let those thoughts just drift on by and let that be part of the meditation practice. =)\n- b) I actually find working on my trees very meditative, and in my experience, meditation doesn't necessarily require a formal setting to happen (look up *walking meditation*, for example). \n- c) If I were meditating with a bonsai present, I'd just try to appreciate the bonsai in the moment, for what it is, in the state that it's in.\n\nThere are few things in life I find more peaceful and meditative than walking around my garden and looking at my trees.\n\nMeditation is really just about being in the moment, and that can be done regardless of physical distraction, and sometimes in spite of it. I once venetian plastered the entry way to my house by hand. One coat of plaster took about 40 hours, start to finish. I think I ended up using 5 coats, plus I turtle waxed the whole thing when I was done. Took me most of the summer, in every hour of spare time I had. Most meditative thing I've ever done.", "299" ], [ "There's not much to do with this right now other than just let it grow, and learn to keep it healthy. They grow pretty slowly, so it will be a while before this one has much that needs to be done.\n \n- [Here's one of mine from 2010-2014](_URL_1_)\n\n- [And here's an update that brings you up to 2017](_URL_2_)\n\nBetween those two albums, you should get a sense for how they grow and develop, and also for how slowly they grow.\n\nIf you want to thicken up the trunk, you'll need to put this into a larger pot at some point. If I were you, though, I'd just enjoy it for what it is for this season. I usually let new stuff grow as-is for a season before doing anything drastic to them. When you do re-pot, look into proper bonsai soil (there's info in the wiki) - this soil looks way too organic.\n\nI'd actually recommend you get some more material, probably in the form of nursery stock, so you'll have more to do. You'll learn a lot more that way, plus it will keep you from wanting to over-work this one.\n\nAs others have mentioned, [this is the kind of question that belongs in the beginner's thread](_URL_0_). \n\nWe get a ton of questions like this, and it helps keep the front page clear from having a ton of duplicate questions that don't require much discussion. Plus, the beginner's thread gets archived for others to learn from.\n\nI'm going to close this thread out now, but feel free to follow up with more questions about developing this tree in the weekly beginner's thread.\n\nCheers,\n\n~MM", "408" ], [ "fwiw, when people completely cross the line, the comments do get deleted and the civility rules enforced. I just don't like being too much of a hard-ass about it, and honestly, have better things to do with my time. So things that are kind of in the gray area do slip by sometimes.\n\nBut sometimes I do feel the need to step in and be the adult supervision, because we should be talking about trees, not engaging in pissing matches. If a thread turns into (or is about to turn into) a shit show, it gets managed.", "621" ], [ "> I think thirty is a good number to learn on. I'm actually trying to reduce the size of my collection this year.\n\nNo guts, no glory man. More. =)\n\nOf course, as I say that, I have at least a half dozen fairly substantial projects that need to be wired this week before they leaf out, and the big ones will all wake up soon and need re-potting/pruning/wiring on top of that, including a few that are undoubtedly all-day projects. Going to be a busy next few weeks ...\n\nBut aside from the busy season in the spring, the rest of the year isn't *that* much different between 25 and 75-100 trees. Mostly just keeping them watered.", "408" ], [ "I guess for me, every one is another experiment on my quest to learn how to develop trunks and branches. \n\nI could see maybe at some point much later, settling down with 10 or 20 really nice ones and then just using what I've learned over the previous decades to maintain them, but that seems like something to do when I'm too old to lift nursery pots any more. =)\n\nI get the space thing though. For me, winter storage space is the bigger issue. If I used my space more efficiently, I could definitely squeeze in a bunch more, but it's definitely a bit tight right now. They also take up a lot of my yard, but I'm OK with that. At this point, I just consider the yard a workshop/bonsai garden.\n\nI just moved a few from nursery pots to (largish) training pots, so they're much easier to move around now at least.\n\nBut I just can't help myself - I love the process of digging through nursery stock to look for gems.", "408" ], [ "This is one I've had for about 3 years or so, and it was finally time to put it in a training pot. It started waking up, so it was either now or wait another year. It took me a solid two hours to carefully work the root ball down. \n\nI plan on letting it develop in this pot for *at least* 3-5 years, so this is it's new home for a while.\n\nIt needs some wiring and pruning as well, but this is all I had time for yesterday.", "408" ], [ "I still want the trunk to thicken up, so chopping back is kind of counter-productive right now. \n\n- My plan is to gradually reduce inward over the next few seasons at least (chasing back the foliage), so that way it mostly gets to grow and add wood to the tree. That will yield me both better branches and a better trunk over time.\n\n- I can always chop later once I get the trunk where I want it if I need to. If I chop now, I get better ramification in the short-term, but I'd just be slowing down the overall process.\n\n- My general philosophy for growing out material is to grow branches so that they form a frame, and then let it exist at that scale for 2-3 seasons as it fills in. Then reduce the canopy back and repeat. \n\n- I've already got the frame going here, so it's perfectly positioned for that. It may look over-grown for the next few seasons, but the trunk will look significantly better in a few years as a result.", "408" ], [ "Pumice is great if you have easy access to it. I find perlite to be way too light for bonsai soil.\n\nI use roughly 2 parts turface, 1 part grit, 1 part Metromix 510 (fancy potting soil), but I tend to tweak the mix as I go, so that really is an approximation. I usually end up adding more turface if it looks too organic.\n\nNot sure what \"too salty\" means. This mix is mostly inorganic, and any excess fertilizer or salts will regularly get washed out with daily watering. Lots of people have odd ideas about turface though.", "408" ], [ "For this season, my plan is to use the balanced canopy I have to help the roots recover and fill back in, and then I can start playing games with letting certain parts grow at different rates than others next year. For this year, I just want to reconfigure it to work with this pot.\n\nThere are a number of things I can do from there to impact trunk growth rates for artistic purposes. In person, the trunks work better together than they appear to in the photo in any case.", "408" ], [ "Thanks! This was a seriously lucky find. I wasn't even particularly looking for a tree that day, but I bought it on the spot as soon as I saw it. And as a bonus, it was priced as nursery stock, not bonsai. \n\nThe way you see it here is just a slightly refined version of what it was when I got it, too. I've given it a haircut the past couple of summers to encourage inner branching, and I've done a small amount of branch work, and a couple minor repots, but that's about it. This re-pot was the most significant work so far by a large margin.\n\nThis is definitely one of my favorite trees now. I'm looking forward to eventually seeing it in a bonsai pot.", "408" ], [ "I did consider that, and I still might later. It's larch, so shouldn't be too hard to still do it next season if I want to, even if it requires raffia or vetwrap. \n\nBut I kind of like it the way it is, tbh. I see real trees do this sometimes. For whatever reason, the tree's main trunk slants, and then the rest of the branches fill in normally. \n\nThere was also a bit of practicality to it. I needed a lot of wire to get all the branches where I wanted them, and running a 5mm wire up the middle in addition would have been a pretty tight squeeze in some places. \n\nBut mostly, I just kind of liked it the way it is.", "408" ], [ "Ah, you haven't learned the trick yet. ;-)\n\nPut the clay over the cut, lick your finger, and then smooth it out. I learned that trick from <PERSON> years ago, and have been doing it ever since. It's like a completely different product when you apply it that way.\n\nThe latex stuff is great too. Both types are useful for different things, and each is arguably the best tool available for the things they're good at.", "761" ] ]
321
[ 12456, 22380, 15364, 12148, 23595, 3017, 16502, 23153, 11214, 21901, 124, 7476, 19439, 7234, 5984, 17229, 2659, 23036, 6954, 2316, 9680, 1980, 16254, 11279, 18634, 10475, 20888, 22409, 950, 22427, 23332, 8290, 3511, 11078, 4662, 7744, 22045, 15425, 3632, 12711, 24148, 10554, 22617, 18085, 11560, 13017, 15754, 2867, 17652, 21280, 16765, 6509, 8162, 8836, 5420, 13210, 10358, 15742, 10904, 5397, 13433, 15448, 24494, 21884, 16872, 4312, 20616, 3935, 19695, 23185, 6661, 3816, 17183, 16570, 9186, 23672, 11900, 17185, 14854, 3718, 393, 25155, 19032, 1299, 24943, 4769, 15630, 7205, 5342, 3799, 14723, 19607, 5, 14095, 8929, 23720, 325, 18467, 24622, 17576, 10691, 17778, 5714, 22566, 8530, 9584, 23625, 23097, 13212, 1795, 24507, 16479, 8891, 19989, 21869, 16054, 17618, 6936, 2887, 9767, 8331, 8743, 13580, 12879, 14141, 16637, 13894, 8712, 2657, 16788, 8954, 8346, 19272, 19963, 15683, 12268, 22664, 20410, 52, 156, 6278, 24872, 20080, 4030, 24617, 24553, 5648, 9351, 21762, 4230, 21952, 16027, 10567, 21484, 1542, 25469, 2705, 17071, 15848, 17170, 12428, 23962, 2665, 22794, 3845, 22918, 1567, 11452, 21948, 17639, 22222, 1389, 23560, 20458, 9876, 595, 22043, 19295, 10386, 7010, 8748, 20787, 13276, 3938, 22376, 19497, 1256, 23137, 21163, 16991, 51, 18460, 17694, 15595, 2375, 19137, 5807, 8091, 12977, 19525, 14880, 5244, 24262, 20597, 21469, 2971, 3493, 18364, 20737, 23653, 10016, 10658, 25459, 16314, 12104, 13187, 1731, 20213, 11754, 18955, 19973, 13468, 11278, 17665, 2123, 11896, 22464, 17305, 16873, 16234, 9479, 12890, 12857, 14731, 16429, 229, 21525, 15688, 19905, 376, 17503, 12174, 16349, 801, 19006, 24994, 19651, 24409, 20159, 5934, 16299, 24544, 22663, 3730, 12536, 880, 9685, 972, 1528, 20645, 123, 6068, 15706, 8388, 17162, 21829, 18761, 2986, 23230, 3922, 3760, 5353, 20827, 14901, 982, 7190, 25304, 11483, 20918, 17757, 19614, 25161, 21784, 24509, 17923, 20449, 22751, 13463, 18331, 636, 24632, 5467, 7968, 25191, 10467, 2625, 9282, 22293, 10504, 19912, 10794, 11563, 6166, 11634, 11637, 2271, 459, 25103, 12451, 1189, 2909, 8259, 7982, 23455, 811, 24054, 7502, 707, 19774, 4557, 18723, 18452, 24595, 16472, 8650, 10350, 3827, 25137, 6395, 17704, 24957, 11704, 11433, 25420, 15941, 22013, 22146, 17974, 11918, 17423, 16764, 12486, 4344, 7226, 4619, 10745, 18769, 24146, 22374, 24603, 15067, 19329, 11589, 21242, 14497, 3224, 12871, 16400, 14632, 24105, 12472, 20705, 765, 5634, 17371, 17659, 12108, 23492, 443, 22741, 20831, 21156, 5983, 17739, 10644, 17982, 3100, 5911, 15741, 13876, 21571, 16026, 3422, 22388, 18844, 16187, 10091, 15024, 9626, 14060, 19372, 1311, 16348, 10968, 24235, 10330, 14212, 19734, 9577, 5497, 25217, 10612, 15045, 14383, 4410, 22453, 17650, 5894, 15983, 17914, 5010, 20621, 16898, 15040, 11992, 25371, 16211, 23496, 22234, 20784, 3244, 21749, 15402, 9650, 16499, 20721, 17666, 24139, 3586, 1663, 24869, 15468, 10103, 24023, 4327, 20324, 4103, 23559, 24137, 4200, 23658, 10695, 1692, 19954, 8972, 5068, 15421, 12504, 7745, 20046, 7795, 4880, 18770, 8386, 12876, 9928, 2426, 23413, 11158, 16844, 14851, 22749, 12367, 7641, 9354, 16175, 17122, 22545, 22248, 11883, 8475, 9222, 17911, 20501, 23865, 21503, 7039, 25289, 12266, 11343, 6882, 14396, 9899, 19276, 7276, 22239, 18812, 334, 5549, 327, 18273, 24930, 6044, 19779, 16486, 1977, 6263, 9024, 21376 ]
reddit_dump_-not-a-serial-killer
[ [ "I'm not sure why you're being downvoted just for not instantly knowing this stuff. It's really common to see riders at my local crits racing in the lower grades on mtb pedals. By the time you get to C grade, they're pretty rare and I've never seen someone race A grade with them.\n\nIf you do switch to Shimano road pedals eventually, ignore anyone who tells you that you need to progress through the cleats (yellow to blue to red) reducing your float to get better pedal connection. I was misled by that advice when I got into it as well. I've since gone back to yellow cleats. \n\nThere are very few people who should ever use the zero-float red cleats at all. Of those few riders who should, they still need to have their bike fit absolutely perfect or else they can end up doing damage to their knees. Many sprinters prefer blue, but there's nothing wrong with choosing more float if that's what you're comfortable with.", "318" ], [ "Where did guns come into this discussion? I'm just saying that these are examples of people who use religion for political gain. <PERSON> once publicly stated pro-abortion views and has certainly lived a particularly lavish and unchristian life. Once he started running as a Republican, he suddenly needed to appeal to the party's base, for whom the church is very important, so he changed his tack on many issues including abortion and paid off the pornstar he had an affair with, to keep that quiet as well. It seems like a pretty clear example of using religion as a tool. Do you believe that I'm mistaken and he's actually a deeply christian man who is genuinely concerned about living a godly life?", "754" ], [ "It's the only thing that's ever worked for me and I would say that it's kept me alive at times. Despite racing at quite a high level, fitness gains are only the second most important consideration in my training. I try to find that sweet spot between getting as fit as I can, while still enjoying the rides as much as possible. For me, that means avoiding intervals and structured training almost entirely. Luckily I respond really well to high-volume training, because I do love going out and stomping 200+km in a day. Bone-conduction earphones have made it even better, because I can now put on a podcast or playlist while I go. I don't have to think about anything but living in the moment and enjoying the ride.", "9" ], [ "> I think Dell should replace it quickly?\n\nThat was what I thought a few weeks ago, but after wasting all this time with Dell Support, I still haven't been given any indication of what they plan to do. In fact the last email they sent me four days ago was literally blank. No hello, no content, just the default signature for no reason at all. I replied to it immediately in case it was an accident, but have been ghosted since then.\n\nThe original replacement wasn't done by Dell Support either, but by going back to the store right after I'd bought it. I unfortunately couldn't do that with this one because it was taken overseas for two weeks the day after I bought it.", "691" ], [ "The specs on it are awesome for the price. I bought an Inspiron for the same reason, but it was a terrible mistake. They're just more cheaply made than the competition, which is why they can do such great specs for the money. Spend a bit more on another brand to spare yourself the nightmare that is Dell Support. \n\nI had to replace the first unit I got for being faulty. Unfortunately I was also given a defective replacement and that's what I'm currently stuck with. I've wasted so much time on Dell Support, yet I'm no closer to having something usable.", "127" ], [ "I bought an Inspiron and the battery is the component that fails on me just about every day. I bought a laptop for the portability, but it thinks that it has no charge in it if I try to turn it on while unplugged. It's not that it runs out of battery either. If I close it at home with 80%, then it'll either not turn on at all or it'll die within seconds. If I then get it to turn on while unplugged, it miraculously finds the 80% that it had before and I can then use it without the cable.\n\nI've desperately tried to get Dell Support to help me with it, but for all the hours wasted, I'm no closer to having a computer that I can use. Buy something else from a brand that stands behind its product.", "706" ], [ "The inspiron has good specs for the price, but they do that by making it in a particularly cheap build and having non-existent quality control. I just recently bought myself an Inspiron and after getting the first one replaced for being faulty, I'm now still stuck with the defective replacement that I was given. I've wasted way too much time with Dell Support to still be without a functional computer. Get a Microsoft Surface or something from Lenovo where your warranty is worth more than the paper they write it on.", "127" ], [ "I don't have experience with the Acer or Asus models that you're looking at, so all I can do is tell you not to get the Dell. I just bought an Inspiron and a month later, I'm still trying to get to the point of having a usable computer. I was originally sold a faulty unit, which was replaced with a new one. Unfortunately they replaced it with another faulty one, which I'm still stuck with. For all the time that I've wasted with Dell Support, I'm no closer to being able to use this garbage. Get something else from a brand willing to stand behind their product.", "127" ], [ "It's basically a well-specced laptop in all respects except for graphics. Unfortunately that doesn't tell the whole story. I just bought an Inspiron myself. After the experience that I've had with it, all I can say is don't do it. Don't waste your money on an Inspiron and don't waste hours with Dell Support trying to get them to sort out their dodgy product. After buying a faulty unit, I was given a replacement, which is also defective. For all the time that I've wasted with Dell Support, I'm no closer to being able to use the computer that I bought.", "127" ], [ "Why pay for extra warranty when they don't stand behind their warranty anyway? I just bought a Dell unit and after getting the original unit replaced (by the store, not Dell) for being faulty, I'm currently stuck with the also-defective replacement. For all the hours wasted with Dell Support, I'm still no closer to having something I can use. At this point, I sincerely regret wasting my money on Dell. I'm now saving up to get something else, but unfortunately I don't have the funds to splash out for a new laptop every couple of weeks.", "923" ], [ "Are you absolutely set on getting a Dell? You can get some pretty great specs on a [Surface Laptop 2](_URL_1_) or a [Surface Book 2](_URL_0_) for that price, especially once you get their 10% student discount on top. The big advantage there is having something from a brand that stands behind their product and cares about their warranty. I bought myself a Dell for this semester, so I'm now stuck using a pen and paper more than I have since school. I'm on my second defective unit and for all the time that I've wasted with Dell Support, I'm no closer to using the laptop for what I bought it for.", "127" ], [ "If the video about the macbook warranty has scared you towards Dell now, don't think that they're any better. I'm currently trying to navigate Dell Support to get them to help me with the defective unit that I was given when I returned my first one for being faulty. I've wasted so many hours with Dell Support for weeks now, but I've made no progress at all. I'm now saving up to buy myself a new computer, because it looks like I'm shit out of luck. They have no interest in helping me with this one.", "923" ], [ "The Dell might heat up on you or it might not. The problem with Dell is that they won't help you if you're one of the unlucky ones who has an issue. I fall into that category having recently bought a faulty unit. I've wasted way too much time with their Support team getting absolutely nowhere. I can't really afford to buy a new computer every few weeks, but it looks like I'm going to have to make an exception because Computer Science isn't really a subject where you can do your studies just with pen and paper. I'd love for them to prove me wrong, but it's taken so long now that that's looking very unlikely.", "493" ], [ "My hate comes from their treatment of me after I bought a faulty one myself. The store where I bought it (not Dell Support) replaced it for me, but unfortunately the replacement is defective as well. I've been trying to get them to help me for weeks, I've spent hours on the phone and tried reaching out to them in any way that I can. For all the time that I've wasted, there has been absolutely no progress. It turns out that it's not easy to study computer science when I'm restricted to pen and paper.", "493" ], [ "Lenovo would be my pick for sure. I unfortunately fell for Dell's strategy of packing in the best specs for the money with no regard to how well it's built and no quality assurance. I've spent hours with Dell Support over the past weeks desperate to get them to help me. Unfortunately I've made no progress so far. It's taken so long now that it looks like they're not interested in helping me. I'll just be buying myself a new computer despite really not having the budget for it after getting this crappy Dell.", "127" ], [ "The problem with the Dell units isn't necessarily that they're too old , but rather that you'll be reliant on Dell Support if something goes wrong with it. I just bought a Dell laptop here in Australia and I can confidently say that I've never regretted a purchase as much as this one. The first unit was faulty, so JB Hi Fi replaced it for me (not Dell Support), but being another Dell, the replacement was also faulty. I've now wasted weeks with Dell trying desperately to get them to help sort this out for me. They're just so unresponsive and that's even after I've tried contacting them on every platform possible. They say that they'll get back to me promptly, then I don't hear from them again until I come back and ask them if they have any updates. It's taken so long now that I've had to start saving for a second computer that I just can't afford right now.", "493" ], [ "I'm not really familiar with either of those, but I recommend very strongly that you buy the Lenovo. The biggest advantage that it has is just not being made by Dell. If you have an issue with the Dell one, they will not help you. I just recently bought a defective Dell and it's been a nightmare. If I'd known just how bad Dell Support is, then I would never have bought it. \n\nIt's been going for weeks and after all the hours spent on the phone where they concluded that there was indeed a major problem with the laptop, they now tell me that they won't replace it.", "127" ], [ "The problems that you see on this sub might not be particularly common in the real-world. The real problem with going for a Dell is their non-existent after-sales support. After going in circles for weeks, since contacting Dell about the issue that I'm having with mine, they got back to me today saying that they won't help me with it. Their tech had concluded over the phone that there was a major issue that he couldn't solve, so he would need to escalate it. The Ecalation Team then decided that they weren't interested in helping me.", "370" ], [ "You can try. Dell Support is probably not going to help you though. I had their technician tell me over the phone that there was an issue with mine that he wasn't able to fix remotely. After going in circles with their support team for weeks, they finally get back to me and say that they won't help me with it. Did you buy it from a store or direct from Dell? if it was from a store, I recommend just returning it to the store for a refund.", "493" ], [ "During my interaction with Dell Support, I mentioned taking it back to JB Hi Fi for refund as an alternative. They replied to me by email, so I have the following in writing from them:\n\n > it is also subjected for approval from our Escalation Team. Also JB HIFI requires an approval from them as well in order to start the refund process.\n\nWhile I believe that JB Hi Fi has the right to issue a refund without consulting Dell, Dell assured me that they don't. This email should take care of that question right?", "467" ], [ "JB would need approval to get their own refund from Dell, but Dell can't stop them from giving back my money before that process. Working in retail, I've processed warranty claims before and sometimes if it's on a weekend (for a warranty department only open weekdays) and absolutely clear that the claim is valid, then I'll just grab a replacement off the shelf for the customer. I then just throw the defective one into the warranty bin to get processed eventually.", "467" ], [ "Absolutely don't go for the Dell unit. I made the mistake of buying a Dell and it's been defective since I got it. I've tried to get a solution from Dell Support, but they've been so unhelpful that today I decided that I may have to sue them. \n\nI've gone to a legal advice sub and written about [my experience](_URL_0_) for advice. Read through that to see if that's the sort of after-sales support that you want to be relying on.", "493" ], [ "I needed a computer immediately. There was a huge discount (~33% off JB's price) on that model online (new not refurb or anything). JB Hi Fi price matched that, making it a few hundred dollars cheaper than anything else with the specs that it has. I meant that I didn't get an extra discount specifically because it was a display model, but I was originally okay with that because I was already getting a big discount regardless.", "618" ], [ "I used to agree very strongly with you and until just recently, I was still racing on tubulars as well. When I picked up my new bike, it was set up tubeless and I didn't get around to changing it immediately, because I figured that I'd just throw in a tube the first time that I got a flat. Thousands of kilometres later, I'm still waiting for that flat. I even have my separate race wheels set up with lighter race-day tubeless tyres as well now (I sold my rim-brake tubular race wheels when I bought my new disc-brake bike). I've done races like the Grafton to Inverell and the Melbourne to Warrnambool on my tubeless setup without issue.", "318" ], [ "Tyre choice is certainly still a really important factor. The tyres that I've had such good luck with are the rather beefy Giant Gavia AC 0. If I did all of my riding on the Vittoria Corsa Speed tyres that I race on, then I'd be dealing with regular blowouts as well. The only real advantage of training on road tubeless is that you can ride tyres that are a little lighter and faster-rolling, while getting fewer punctures than you would with tubes. My Giant training tyres ride a lot more nicely than Gatorskins or Duranos, while getting the same puncture resistance when set up as tubeless. Not trying to tell you that you have to switch, but just that they've had not trouble with the high pressures that I've been running on the road.", "803" ], [ "Just go for the Lenovo so that you have a real warranty and after-sale support. I made the mistake of buying a Dell and unfortunately ended up with a defective one. I've wasted so much of my time with Dell Support who've done nothing to fix the issue and decided that because the issue wasn't noticed immediately, they don't have to replace it. It's still well within the warranty period, so I'm not sure how they came to that conclusion.", "923" ], [ "You're using a lot more variables than you need to. You also aren't naming them in a way that's at all descriptive. If you keep naming variables like this, your code will be unreadable when you're writing long programs.\n\n #include < stdio.h > \n #include < cs50.h > \n #include < math.h > \n \n float get_positive_float(string prompt);\n int main(void)\n {\n int totalcoins = 0;\n int coins;\n float change = get_positive_float(\"Change owed:\");\n int exactchange = round(i*100);\n if (exactchange > = 25)\n {\n coins = exactchange / 25;\n exactchange = exactchange % 25; \n totalcoins = totalcoins + coins;\n }\n if (exactchange > = 10)\n {\n coins = exactchange / 10;\n exactchange = exactchange % 10;\n totalcoins = totalcoins + coins;\n }\n if (exactchange > = 5)\n {\n coins = exactchange / 5;\n exactchange = exactchange % 5;\n totalcoins = totalcoins + coins;\n }\n if (exactchange > = 1)\n {\n coins = exactchange / 1;\n exactchange = exactchange % 1;\n totalcoins = totalcoins + coins;\n }\n printf(\"Coins used:%i\\n\", totalcoins);\n }\n \n float get_positive_float(string prompt)\n {\n float i;\n do\n {\n i = get_float(\"Change owed:\");\n }\n while (i < 0.00);\n return i;\n }", "446" ] ]
362
[ 24152, 14913, 6873, 15584, 25438, 12406, 1195, 6848, 4508, 16025, 6369, 25110, 21108, 19365, 3314, 18848, 4015, 23065, 11659, 140, 20009, 18653, 676, 12737, 1367, 11259, 8055, 11194, 20312, 7070, 223, 24700, 23246, 7171, 23638, 6137, 7003, 23155, 21511, 7196, 14535, 3351, 8816, 15471, 2933, 22301, 18517, 24054, 13748, 11874, 12883, 4098, 11594, 18844, 11842, 3922, 4165, 10345, 22117, 7527, 12614, 5634, 17594, 2383, 22362, 11320, 6509, 9769, 5793, 24137, 4636, 12551, 1738, 13944, 17599, 13894, 13779, 1978, 14922, 15702, 25520, 20691, 22270, 8088, 22953, 20567, 16029, 6717, 16987, 12212, 3631, 10222, 2123, 6814, 18855, 23086, 13865, 13703, 12463, 16115, 302, 23225, 10286, 6619, 2872, 13931, 5873, 20747, 23665, 19707, 13100, 7113, 219, 2738, 7172, 19899, 18995, 11095, 5718, 9039, 23041, 8404, 1327, 7823, 827, 5265, 11738, 11468, 2615, 24970, 21744, 14657, 5405, 11016, 19056, 10643, 13981, 8994, 10116, 6653, 5495, 22182, 4185, 19076, 23930, 3142, 15950, 16015, 25022, 21617, 11006, 22069, 11551, 11386, 21280, 5, 5552, 5783, 611, 18778, 25253, 19083, 11985, 3832, 9099, 12490, 15653, 22589, 24031, 8751, 23492, 23756, 4064, 9082, 21830, 19634, 20268, 24265, 20621, 3120, 22282, 17176, 1389, 17757, 8846, 24684, 19106, 13878, 16429, 3864, 12793, 25047, 1248, 9252, 6880, 15595, 23593, 25279, 2624, 16745, 14899, 23614, 2289, 1355, 13301, 23894, 11128, 2995, 12466, 14802, 10467, 15865, 16499, 7769, 20862, 3255, 12291, 9634, 15723, 17826, 3699, 13583, 3395, 23024, 5985, 3723, 2150, 11979, 13990, 17970, 16730, 16611, 15404, 7524, 15672, 10557, 21662, 18312, 17170, 7126, 7894, 9418, 24697, 7540, 575, 4817, 16753, 2707, 4879, 4850, 22714, 11440, 4821, 8394, 3330, 7348, 9274, 5143, 25511, 65, 9637, 20645, 19544, 14167, 5159, 25071, 12879, 18152, 17307, 13082, 23099, 7010, 12772, 18672, 20888, 16666, 18901, 13941, 21653, 12428, 6581, 334, 8440, 6961, 1507, 19861, 19855, 9982, 11203, 23324, 19480, 11761, 13540, 950, 8399, 4352, 1145, 16435, 1547, 11147, 5724, 20510, 8549, 17403, 21673, 16387, 8208, 855, 1827, 16187, 851, 12232, 17777, 38, 1413, 22049, 18247, 20096, 4398, 22099, 24503, 17340, 24745, 14400, 7952, 7272, 9370, 2089, 3025, 13860, 7316, 4004, 4145, 22733, 17056, 23935, 17331, 24331, 2164, 12899, 6601, 13739, 18611, 19699, 14205, 2918, 24298, 8090, 5333, 21945, 17689, 8821, 17748, 14301, 1371, 16692, 9138, 24615, 9591, 1694, 20893, 17665, 12561, 13161, 19329, 10246, 405, 20568, 16635, 21607, 1071, 11754, 10788, 17809, 21803, 2777, 11709, 20974, 4887, 13453, 4202, 8814, 14676, 10735, 11555, 12460, 3622, 4499, 9241, 17275, 21679, 19949, 12596, 3964, 19209, 20305, 9603, 10794, 17360, 20393, 20650, 21006, 24467, 6555, 24147, 4919, 6361, 6367, 7811, 9614, 14074, 25446, 8261, 9238, 5593, 10678, 21360, 8255, 4709, 21500, 1493, 15117, 844, 17342, 20013, 1059, 23079, 7168, 17439, 11660, 21972, 8217, 2541, 20131, 555, 3409, 14731, 12438, 23013, 6538, 19457, 1305, 2628, 15262, 24200, 1623, 3766, 17071, 23268, 20080, 3849, 23356, 4989, 2781, 17576, 6336, 21598, 22766, 17702, 1253, 18896, 17818, 3372, 4868, 19051, 12903, 11569, 807, 18917, 15600, 21613, 5527, 20996, 1505, 1567, 18357, 6943, 13908, 19310, 5010, 22734, 19612, 11598, 10277, 17998, 20603, 19424, 23420, 6673, 16154, 20542, 24052, 2057, 17495, 12574, 24737, 23353, 16479, 13059 ]
reddit_dump_-o-o-o
[ [ "I have heard conflicting results ala Ponds and <PERSON> with Cold Fusion so I am still interested enough to do some digging.\n\n _URL_1_ **Null Result for Prediction of Asymmetrical Anomalous Force from Frustum-shaped RF Resonant Cavity.**\n\nAuthors: <PERSON>\n\nNASA's Preliminary Paper\n\n_URL_0_\n\nMeasurement of Impulsive Thrust from a Closed Radio-Frequency Cavity in Vacuum\n\nA vacuum test campaign evaluating the impulsive thrust performance of a tapered radio-frequency test article excited in the transverse magnitude 212 mode at 1937 MHz has been completed. The test campaign consisted of a forward thrust phase and reverse thrust phase at less than 8×10−6torr8×10−6 torr vacuum with power scans at 40, 60, and 80 W. The test campaign included a null thrust test effort to identify any mundane sources of impulsive thrust; however, none were identified. **Thrust data from forward, reverse, and null suggested that the system was consistently performing with a thrust-to-power ratio of 1.2±0.1mN/kW1.2±0.1 mN/kW.**\n\n\nRead More: _URL_0_", "234" ], [ "Exactly. We need to dismantle the ''national security state'' How? The same way it was built. Person by person Agency by Agency.\nRepealing the Patriot Act and all of the excesses would be a first order of busines. Disbanding the TSA and Homeland Security would be Job 3 or 4 . Auditing and then Abolishing the federal reserve would be job 2.\nStrict adherance to the Constitutionality of any Agency and its actions at home and abroad. We would need to build some more jails. We would be spending the next 20 years bringing people to trial for crimes against the people they were supposed to be protecting.\n<PERSON>, <PERSON>,<PERSON>,<PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> , <PERSON>, <PERSON>, All members of the senate,congress oversight for NRO,CIA,FBI,DIA,DHS,IRS,NSA, there is plenty of room for pulling the fangs of the domestic activities of this group and prosecuting and jailing those who permitted and authorised those actions.", "298" ], [ "say what you like they have 47% of the daily Ethereum trade volume..Kraaken 11%. \n<PERSON> & <PERSON> personally handled a DGD-DAO ICO issue within a matter of 8 hours which saw my Coins stuck because of an error. \nThat said..no overnighting on an exchange. Anything you leave should be considered ''lost'' Pay the costs and move your funds daily or be at risk.", "831" ], [ "A report of a remote viewing session in attempt to glean intelligence on a high performance aircraft using CRV,TRV,or ERV Co-Ordinate Remote Viewing,Technical Remote Viewing ,Extended Remote Viewing. Your tax dollars at work. <PERSON> ran a program for the CIA teaching the technique to remotely gather intelligence using Psychic Interogation of a given target. This report was an attempt to look at a UFO and glean any useful data.", "226" ], [ "_URL_0_\n\nDear /u/Dan_in_San_Diego\nThis is just a little sample of the actual documentation required to operate an actual Solar Power set up in Borrego Springs from 2013 Complete to the Gallon of water usage for 30 years. Image analysis of the area shows no such project(like yours) and a public records search will no doubt reveal the same\n_URL_1_\nYour posts and story's are complete and unadulterated bullshit from start to finish\nThe various claims about SDGE are demonstrably false. Your claims about FREE WATER from a well are absolutely false. Your claims of supplying produce to employee's of 30 Hospitals in California also false.\nHere's the thing Dan_in San_Diego if you are going to BS people there are people who are going to look you up.\nHeres a Bitcoin address if you want to roll the dice and call me out. 12UB4vgk712YSNZCWjhsYwpk8auimPBSQG\n\n(Yea thats a deposit only address because I won't be paying you a single satoshi)", "731" ], [ "His story is wrong in so many ways ''free water'' \n\nEdit* Regs _URL_0_\n\nPublic Record search will come up empty\n\n_URL_1_\n\nBill Horn is on the Board of Supervisors responsible for ground water use in the Borrego Springs area and any Commercial use of groundwater in this area will be subject to review. Public Records for any commercial project will require regulatory application and review.\n\n Land Use and Zoning\nAs a new agricultural business you will need to know about the regulations that apply to your\npotential business location. Zoning and Land Use information can be easily obtained from the\nCounty of San Diego, Department of Planning and Land Use. Through the parcel number and/or\nphysical address of the site, the Department of Planning and Land Use will be able to provide you\nwith the approved usage, as well as possible restrictions, for your future agricultural business site.\nThe Department of Planning and Land Use will also be able to assist you with questions regarding\nexisting and planned facility use.\n\nCounty of San Diego, Department of Planning and Land Use\n5201 Ruffin Road\nSan Diego, CA 92123\nPhone: <PHONE_NUMBER> or <PHONE_NUMBER>", "31" ], [ "Monday morning when the County opens they are going to have a lot of requests for information on commercial agricultural land usage below 100 acres within their jurisdiction.\n**A Project listed in Section 67.711 that will extract or use at least one acre-foot\n(325,851 gallons) of groundwater per year shall include one or more groundwater\nuse reduction measures listed in subsection B below. The groundwater use\nreduction measures shall fully offset the amount of groundwater that the proposed\nproject will use and shall result in “no net increase” in the amount of groundwater\nextracted from the Borrego Valley Exemption Area.**", "31" ], [ "**1.I will apologize and donate $100.00 in your username to the Charity of your choice upon the *verified* proof of your many claims.** *Proof of Donation to be posted* If its to Wikileaks or EFF then the Blockchain Tx Id will be provided along with the apology.\n\n_URL_0_ to your offer of a ''gentlemans bet'' since the last shyster on Reddit failed to deliver on a far far smaller amount. If you would like to prove you have 500 BTC by all means do so.\n\n\nThis is all very public since you like the number 500 so much I will donate $500.00 to the Charity of your choice in your username. \nProof and apology to be posted as a toplevel post in /r/btc.\nIf the Charity accepts Bitcoin the Tx Id will be attached.", "71" ], [ "Naw too busy looking up land sales records in Borrega Springs in case you think I am slacking.\n\nThe APN numbers system is quite interesting. Satellite imagery from 2007-2016 is quite good for the area.\nYour big problem is there is all ready 2017 data available for the same area. If there was something to see there I would have found it long ago. Image overlays show the changes or lack thereof. Tax & Land Sale Records are pretty good. It will take some time.You are bullshit artist and not a good one.\n\n_URL_0_", "904" ], [ "who knew there were so many Hospitals in San Diego County? \n\nNot me\n\n Alvarado Hospital Medical Center – San Diego\n Bayview Hospital – Chula Vista\n Children's Hospital and Health Center – San Diego\n Children's Hospital of San Diego – San Diego\n Fallbrook Hospital – Fallbrook\n Green Hospital of Scripps Clinic – La Jolla\n Kaiser Permanente Medical Center – San Diego\n Kindred Hospital – San Diego – San Diego\n Mary Birch Hospital for Women – San Diego\n Naval Medical Center San Diego – San Diego\n Palomar Medical Center – Escondido\n Paradise Valley Hospital – National City\n Pomerado Hospital – Poway\n Rady Children's Hospital[4]\n San Diego County Psychiatric Hospital – San Diego\n San Luis Rey Hospital – Encinitas\n Scripps Health\n Scripps Green Hospital – La Jolla\n Scripps Memorial Hospital – Encinitas\n Scripps Memorial Hospital – La Jolla\n Scripps Mercy Hospital – Chula Vista\n Scripps Mercy Hospital – San Diego\n Sharp HealthCare\n Sharp Cabrillo Hospital – San Diego\n Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center – Chula Vista\n Sharp Coronado Hospital – Coronado\n Sharp Grossmont Hospital – La Mesa\n Sharp Memorial Hospital – San Diego\n Sharp Mesa Vista – San Diego\n Tri-City Medical Center – Oceanside\n UC San Diego Health – San Diego\n Hillcrest Medical Center – San Diego\n Jacobs Medical Center – La Jolla\n Thornton Hospital – La Jolla\n U.S. Naval Hospital – Camp Pendleton\n Vencor Hospital – San Diego\n Veterans Affairs Medical Center San Diego – La Jolla", "237" ], [ "I am not <PERSON>. I am making appropriate inquiry to ascertain and verify the claims. So far the extensive imagery of the area in question fails to support any of his claims. Land ownership and transfer records are being checked as are the business claims he has made regarding his produce business. His claims of 33% efficient Solar Panels have all ready been shown to be false\n_URL_0_\n24% Efficiency is the current ''state of the art'' commercially available. \nHe has made other claims which will no doubt be found demonstrably false.\n9-5 demands means this will wait until later.", "731" ], [ "They and We should expect that every possible impediment will be levvied and in a manner that is the most beneficial to the PBOC 's wishes. Silent seizures of equipment and infrastructure with some fortuitous market shorts for the inside players. There will be blood and a so called ''black swan'' will be massive. Expect the largest single one day losses the world has ever seen with a corresponding upswing to follow that will take Bitcoin out of the reach of the smaller investor. Capital concentration that will make Billionaires over night.", "1008" ], [ "Here's a newsflash from the future Bitcoin hits $10,000 a coin in panic buying as China attempts to halt capital outflows. Bitcoin will trade at $10,000 US a coin amid global geo political tensions before settling back below $8000.\nIf you don't have any now you will wish you had if and when this happens.\nEthereum is going to be the network of choice for people in China to speedily and safely circumvent any attempt at capital controls. Expect absolutely unheard of demand and the very real possibility of a market shortage of Ethereuem or any other viable crypto currency. If and when it happens it will be a day that will shape the world. People will wake up with a networth of BILLIONS not millions but billions. Step one..have something to sell. The day is coming.", "1008" ], [ "excepted from;*According to Malahov, Aeternity’s competitors include Gnosis, Synereo and Ethereum, the largest cryptocurrency platform after Bitcoin.*\n\nAeternity tokens are planned to sell in the first quarter of 2017.\n\nDevelopment of Aeternity’s Blockchain includes an emphasis on a unified consensus mechanism, a system for smart contract storage and execution, with planned improvements in system governance. The coding is also on Erlang, an industry-proven programming language.\n\n“Malahov's approach to decentralized processing elegantly addresses issues of scale, by taking the state channel approach to the nth degree,’’ <PERSON>, co-founder and chief technology officer at BigchainDB, said in an interview. “That makes it easier to connect emerging decentralized networks.”*\n\nAeternity “could end up being the TCP/IP of decentralized processing,\" <PERSON> said, referring to the protocols that govern communication between networks on the Internet.", "831" ], [ "From the article:\n*A secretive project that would aim to make ethereum more suitable for corporate users is taking shape, according to multiple sources familiar with the project.*\n\nRumored to be called Enterprise Ethereum, the exact nature of the effort remains veiled behind an unusual degree of privacy – especially so for participants who are better known for their work in more transparent open-source communities.\n\nBased on comments from sources, the group – which has the appearance of a broad consortium – intends to remain quiet until it is ready for a forthcoming public launch. Yet, word is already beginning to leak out.\n\nOn Thursday, 15th December, a group of startup founders and representatives from some of the world's largest financial institutions reportedly gathered in New York to discuss the common problems they face when building enterprise applications on ethereum.", "831" ], [ "3 Fingered Hand..with 8'' long fingers..\n\nA group of self-proclaimed paranormal researchers claim they have found a giant claw with belonging to an alien in caves in Peru.\nThey believe the 'giant three-fingered hand', which has fingers at least eight inches long and was allegedly found in tunnels near the ancient city of Cusco, belonged to an alien or ancient human-like creature.\nThe group have so far refused to reveal exactly where the bones were found.", "426" ], [ "> /u/prestonjbyrne deleted the following\n*It's a Medium post.\nI am deeply skeptical of consortium-driven blockchain DB approaches and don't see what the utility of creating \"a Hyperledger Project for Ethereum\" is.\nEveryone already has the spec for the EVM (and the Ethereum Foundation is the custodian of that VM design).\nIf there is a feature which should be implemented in the main chain protocol the proper venue for that is a pull request in the Foundation's core GitHub repository. If there's a feature which some other startup wants to implement that startup is going to do it themselves in a way which makes the most sense for what they are trying to do.\nSo this initiative strikes me, mainly, as a marketing exercise and an attempt to wrest some governance control and brand value away from the Foundation and into the hands of private enterprise.*\n\nI say\n\nIts a Medium post but it shows strategic thinking.\n\n**The medium is the message.**", "831" ], [ "He just saved 12 Billion Dollars by shopping at GEICO\n_URL_0_\n\n According to an official within the Department of Energy, this past Friday, the President-elect’s team instructed the head of the National Nuclear Security Administration and his deputy to clean out their desks when <PERSON> takes office on January 20th.\n\n**The NNSA is the $12 billion-a-year agency that “maintains and enhances the safety, security, and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile.” It’s unclear when the two officials will be replaced.**", "825" ], [ "Prediction DGD-DAO $ 13.80 on Feb 15th 2017 who has an Ethereum Prediction for Ethereum on that day?\n\n_URL_0_\n\n_URL_1_\n\nHow to Compete\nOverview\nModels are ranked by their weight and correlation within Numerai's meta-model. The meta-model is an ensemble of all our data scientist's predictions. Generally, a lower logloss score results in a better rank.\nYou retain all intellectual property rights to your model. You never have to tell anyone how you built it and you never have to tell us who you are. You only upload your predictions.\nDatasets\nnumerai_training_data.csv\nUse this dataset to train your machine learning algorithm. The target column is the binary class you’re trying to predict. All other columns are features.\nnumerai_tournament_data.csv\nOnce you’ve built your model, you can use it to generate probability estimates on this new dataset.\nUploading predictions\nTo upload your predictions, sign in and click the Upload Predictions button on the leaderboard. The format of your prediction upload should be a CSV file with two columns:t_id and probability. The probability column is the probability estimated by your model of the observation being of class 1.\nLeaderboard and earnings\nThe public leaderboard displayed on the homepage is calculated on a subset of the total tournament data. Earnings are calculated on the remainder of the tournament data: the private leaderboard. This discourages overfitting to the public leaderboard.\nEarnings accrue based on the meta-model rank on the private leaderboard. They are presented based on the public leaderboard rank, but accrue based on the private leaderboard rank.\nEarnings are denominated in USD but paid out in bitcoin.", "430" ], [ "Stimulus-Response they say buy the rumor sell the news if you need to sell don't wait sell. I always like to give people a week to sort out their priority's and assimilate the news and then take action FOMO is 1 to 3 but I am not seeing that..so in about 7 days no matter what floor will be in or the bull run will begin or we will be the same as today. Dont wait if you need the money get what you need and then let the rest ride. Nothing is happening in 7 days other than time passing", "691" ], [ "Please bow your heads to hide your snickering faces\n\nDearly beloved\nWe are gathered here today\nTo get through this thing called life\n\nElectric word life\nIt means forever and that's a mighty long time\nBut I'm here to tell you\nThere's something else\nEthereum\n\nA world of never ending happiness\nYou can always see the sun, day or night\n\nSo when you call up that Broker in Beverly Hills\nYou know the one, Dr. <PERSON> it'll Be Alright\nInstead of asking him how much of his Eth is left\nAsk him how much do you need, baby?\n\n'Cause in this life\nThings are much harder in the Bitcoin world\nIn this life\nYou're on your own\n\n with apologys to <PERSON> - Let's Go Crazy Lyrics", "831" ], [ "Gold Price per Gram today for the DGD-DAO guys\n\nGold Price Per Gram = 37.96 US Dollar Bid Price: $37.96Ask Price: $38Day's Range: $37.66 - $38.16\n\nPrice of DGD-DAO? $9+/-\nPrice of DGX = 37.96 if you could get some which you can't but you will be able to soonish soon this year..when 2.0 is a go.\nBecause DGX is backed by Gold bought and Sold Trade and Hold DGX is backed by Gold not just blockchain baby!", "610" ], [ "DGX are backed by Gold and the Blockchain which is a pretty good pairing.\nDGD-DAO is like buying discount Gold. People are just not getting it. ie you buy an asset at $X.00 Dollars this asset pays you out in another asset valued against a gram of gold..$38.00 a gram today..whats not to like?(not to mention silver & Diamonds they have all ready said Silver is on the cards( I expect a vote for another ICO) with current holders getting a discounted buy in. Stealth buy of the decade and a legit 10 bagger", "831" ], [ "Each DGD-DAO is Divisible so 0.5 DGD May well be $15 or for that matter\n 0.25 DGD-DAO may trade in the $7 area. No matter which way I look at this over time the prices today will be seen as an opportunity that should not have been missed..so I am not missing it. Worst comes to the worst I will wind up with some Ethereum. My personal goal is to buy at least another 1000 DGD-DAO in the next 90 days up down or sideways.", "928" ], [ "_URL_1_\n\n\n\n_URL_2_\n\n_URL_0_\n\n**Models are ranked by their weight and correlation within Numerai's meta-model. The meta-model is an ensemble of all our data scientist's predictions. Generally, a lower logloss score results in a better rank.\nYou retain all intellectual property rights to your model. You never have to tell anyone how you built it and you never have to tell us who you are. You only upload your predictions.*<PERSON> IS a 29-year-old South African who runs a hedge fund in San Francisco. Or rather, he doesn’t run it. He leaves that to an artificially intelligent system built by several thousand data scientists whose names he doesn’t know.\n\nUnder the banner of a startup called Numerai, <PERSON> and his team have built technology that masks the fund’s trading data before sharing it with a vast community of anonymous data scientists. Using a method similar to homomorphic encryption, this tech works to ensure that the scientists can’t see the details of the company’s proprietary trades, but also organizes the data so that these scientists can build machine learning models that analyze it and, in theory, learn better ways of trading financial securities.\n\n“We give away all our data,” says <PERSON>, who studied mathematics at Cornell University in New York before going to work for an asset management firm in South Africa. “But we convert it into this abstract form where people can build machine learning models for the data without really knowing what they’re doing.”\n\nHe doesn’t know these data scientists because he recruits them online and pays them for their trouble in a digital currency that can preserve anonymity. “Anyone can submit predictions back to us,” he says. “If they work, we pay them in bitcoin.”\n\nThe company comes across as a Silicon Valley gag. All that’s missing is the virtual reality.\nSo, to sum up: They aren’t privy to his data. He isn’t privy to them. And because they work from encrypted data, they can’t use their machine learning models on other data—and neither can he. But <PERSON> believes the blind can lead the blind to a better hedge fund.", "662" ] ]
76
[ 3584, 20396, 15980, 7801, 13598, 23338, 17919, 10316, 7618, 19074, 20986, 23917, 15896, 157, 14595, 23094, 6123, 9150, 17921, 6699, 11454, 16372, 5331, 10081, 1644, 6855, 288, 10716, 1743, 9086, 21915, 415, 23848, 14989, 22148, 12715, 22978, 10349, 19703, 12224, 5334, 23500, 20323, 20782, 2857, 4371, 7145, 13125, 24888, 2290, 10195, 4157, 17333, 10952, 24652, 14098, 17567, 2524, 17519, 22445, 7860, 15953, 254, 19035, 24864, 281, 25033, 6949, 19713, 23014, 16693, 11271, 23288, 15767, 12409, 4033, 14076, 3027, 13643, 7015, 23346, 11951, 23026, 17611, 20775, 2818, 1473, 24781, 8702, 9513, 21533, 23637, 13016, 22496, 13606, 18220, 11340, 6979, 11331, 494, 24440, 19107, 1853, 11766, 15366, 25535, 6040, 13486, 21241, 9750, 11448, 7345, 438, 20067, 5700, 14583, 7610, 5929, 25312, 3529, 21171, 17608, 24465, 16210, 3026, 12916, 24124, 22603, 21179, 21931, 18303, 13414, 22322, 10895, 11726, 1467, 9806, 21119, 21970, 1092, 17912, 5683, 13313, 7761, 19595, 20880, 3643, 25524, 6854, 24597, 24535, 9000, 18808, 18376, 22134, 18766, 22539, 4801, 7992, 24318, 2305, 1274, 3953, 12286, 13631, 11734, 984, 9901, 20447, 5070, 24556, 7539, 12418, 10143, 22804, 16148, 19297, 11641, 7530, 20224, 21271, 5364, 1747, 18621, 78, 17884, 20219, 24316, 24522, 18335, 19661, 15928, 10264, 24662, 11041, 21082, 21781, 2631, 20622, 1384, 17668, 9996, 16951, 9980, 13584, 1457, 19503, 24884, 16818, 8635, 14434, 7057, 20427, 7828, 23151, 8613, 23311, 21122, 21118, 6128, 22230, 15990, 362, 20953, 12768, 5730, 2557, 10703, 5258, 24397, 10950, 9733, 13399, 253, 10622, 3202, 18656, 1156, 877, 5075, 24578, 13789, 8490, 9971, 23110, 9046, 21785, 16957, 7852, 17939, 222, 3481, 2592, 925, 15395, 3364, 14273, 12633, 13746, 20860, 5615, 24217, 228, 1312, 7622, 23967, 11731, 17376, 15241, 16343, 6122, 117, 16560, 2779, 17443, 21050, 17119, 11698, 5739, 19211, 11102, 3381, 18394, 11419, 11077, 2046, 18643, 21389, 14220, 14410, 23724, 2297, 19315, 18188, 5279, 19720, 3270, 22174, 3400, 2497, 9001, 18381, 1504, 22096, 5236, 11720, 25152, 15183, 11227, 10290, 11050, 24722, 20484, 5060, 381, 7981, 17678, 9833, 13523, 21188, 158, 1713, 23701, 16303, 745, 1016, 12724, 14743, 759, 580, 5009, 24281, 1017, 4024, 18582, 17986, 16531, 11674, 3039, 3296, 371, 9804, 21065, 2837, 8339, 18798, 24913, 4263, 11303, 12693, 3813, 15558, 7684, 8695, 5245, 10136, 14446, 16981, 9707, 21046, 8302, 5697, 8001, 10023, 17335, 4996, 34, 17089, 14510, 18588, 11832, 25428, 13318, 8822, 19354, 1555, 14155, 5562, 1099, 6152, 10461, 18577, 19569, 19191, 23135, 8106, 25087, 6244, 410, 16223, 937, 21572, 3182, 19555, 2737, 200, 11208, 7404, 2215, 15310, 23247, 22812, 10004, 19156, 22710, 670, 11826, 7375, 15770, 23663, 11073, 15083, 7427, 6093, 2326, 53, 19756, 859, 11561, 5877, 9308, 16386, 2627, 13967, 18645, 8367, 10240, 23476, 25315, 11225, 10664, 17577, 22254, 22580, 22959, 19459, 25271, 24629, 5243, 6890, 24436, 8539, 14005, 11553, 24309, 21153, 19112, 24026, 277, 5234, 4869, 8634, 14545, 967, 12305, 10260, 3087, 16790, 14841, 9391, 16907, 6067, 21164, 15805, 727, 20570, 13953, 6292, 15784, 8641, 9368, 16988, 2906, 13378, 8961, 6980, 16571, 10600, 1986, 83, 1524, 565, 19155, 2355, 19491, 3143, 9358, 25409, 1109, 25004, 5828, 12663, 14875, 10268, 8877, 13139, 14371, 4845, 13569 ]
reddit_dump_-paperbrain-
[ [ "I'm having trouble imagining neutral child raising or a neutral diet.\n\nCould you go into more detail?\n\nEverything you consume or use potentially carries some values, and apparently in your eyes even abstaining from foods is forcing a value.\n\nDo you just buy one of everything in the grocery store and let the child choose?\n\nIf there's a choice between a product made with slave labor and one without, do I have to buy both so I'm not forcing a moral stance on my child?", "997" ], [ "\\ > nothing wrong with doing so for an omnivore. \n\nDogs CAN potentially get all of their nutrients from vegan sources, but it's easier said than done. It's also much easier to mess up than a diet rich in animal protein. That's not necessarily a full stop reason one shouldn't try, but if you don't have the resources to work with a veterinary trained nutritionist, you're putting your dog's well being at risk.\n\nAnd I do think there's a good question, much harder to answer objectively over whether dogs on a vegan diet are as happy. Their taste receptors certainly respond strongly to the umami of animal proteins, even the advocates of vegan dog diets will tell you that as they attempt to replicate flavors with yeasts, mushrooms or whatever.\n\nAs an omnivore who MOSTLY eats vegetarian, I can tell you that fake meat doesn't scratch the sensory itch quite as much. And while both humans and domesticated dogs eveolved with an omnivorous diet, theirs has been much more largely meat based, snd their ancestors were closer to carnivors than us.\n\nI can't say it with absolute confidence, but I find it plausible that vegan dogs are at least a bit deprived of joy.\n\nAnd owners are very free to weigh that against the lives of animals who may be slaughtered for pet food and decide they're okay with their dog being a little less happy. That's their choice to make. But I don't think we can say it's all the same with no downsides.", "909" ], [ "Technically, the third option is assimilation.\n\nMulticulturalism doesn't mean a range of skin colors and genetic backgrounds, it means a diversity of values, customs and social norms.\n\nNow there are some who call assimilation a type of genocide, but that's generally when it's propagated by force. Many cultures assimilate within others to various degrees without being forced to do so.\n\nNow I don't agree with OP, and I believ multiculturalism to be incredibly valuable and worthwhile. But you're not the only poster to say that multiculturalism is the only option other than genocide, and that's not accurate. We in the US and much of the west actively choose to encourage and sustain the diversity of culture within communities here.", "818" ], [ "But the thing is, <PERSON>'s not a real person. Neither the fictional character <PERSON>, notrthe actor who played him chose that makeup because of their commitment to a game of D+D.\n\n<PERSON> (or someone else on the writing staff) chose to put <PERSON>'s character in that makeup. And <PERSON> or whoever (ultimately <PERSON>'s responsibility) weren't unaware that the makeup resembled blackface, they had another character comment on it. You're right that the joke being made isn't at the expense of black people in the same way as historical blackface. But the joke still depends on the shocking and transgressive image of blackface, not just an overcommitted geek. They could have done that with any other color face paint. They made that choice because a reference to racism is edgy, but making it inadvertent from an oblivious character gives them permission to use an edgy image without being perceived as racist.\n\nThat's not racist in the sense that the joke mocks black people, but in the sense that it uses a trauma as a cheap transgressive thrill.", "660" ], [ "> For one, if you have a force that is better funded, it acts as a deterrent to hostile powers, and if war does break out, a better funded force can end a war faster, saving lives on both sides of the conflict. \n\nHow did that work out in Iraq, Afghanistan? Vietnam? Our high level of funding did not create swift ends to those conflicts saving lives. Rather the size of our military allowed us to start politically motivated conflicts that then dragged out interminably resulting in continued chaos and loss of life.\n\nIt doesn't seem to be terribly effective.", "1014" ], [ "Might depend on how you define inhumane.\n\nMy grandparents spoke fluent yiddish. My parents know very little because when their parents came to the US, there was a strong cultural stigma against seeming foreign or \"other\". It wasn't government force, but it was a set of cultural expectations. As a result, I only know a few swears in Yiddish.\n\nToday, under the banner of multiculturalism, a Chinese family might even hire a tutor to be sure that their child is able to speak and write Chinese to conctinue their connection to their parents' culture. There has been a shift.\n\nI see it as a positive one.\n\nBut if diversity of culture and preservation of personal cultural heritage weren't actively valued and celebrated, we would see a more homogenized culture.", "5" ], [ "Seems like a better question for \"Askaconservative\".\n\n & #x200B;\n\nI can't get inside anyone's head, but I can guess.\n\nThere are a great number of people who use \"Dr.\" in some for and the writer being a worldly fellow has clearly encountered the use before, but only found it worthy of an op-ed now. \n\nI'm supposing that like a number of conservatives he's frustrated by the outcome of the election, whether he regards it as a fraud or a loss I can't say, but I think I'm safe saying he's likely to be displeased.\n\nIf he's anything like our friends over at r/conservative, then a few other things are likely to be true.\n\n1) Part of his consolation to himself is some level of self congratulation that he's not currently burning down cities or marching in a pink hat. But given that he's prided himself on having no physical reaction, he needs to create a verbal/written reaction letting off some amount of that steam/rage without making it seem like he's really angry, because caring about stuff is not cool.\n\n2) He perceives the last four years as a constant stream of unfair attacks against his party's leader. And one of the few consolations of this power shift is that now it's his turn. His mom may never have mentioned the math between adding up two wrongs.\n\n3) Triggering the libs.\n\n4) Whether it stems from point number four or deep seated hatred or just a weird coincidence, conservatives seem to have a knack for going after women and minorities that plays on stereotypes and challenges they face while vigorously denying that's their motivation.\n\nI don't know this guy, and full disclosure, I got the point of the op-ed pretty quickly and didn't have the stomach to finish it. Maybe I've got this gentleman all wrong.", "134" ], [ "Starting in the 60s, the GOP undertook a policy for shoring up its support by appealing to angry and scared interest groups and they've been gobbling them up ever since.\n\nFirst it was poor white racists in the south who felt resentment towards the progress of civil rights because it seemed to herald a new era where the poorest white guy could no longer see himself as above any black man. This is sometimes called \"The Southern Strategy\".\n\nThen they picked up evangelicals and got them super riled up around abortion. It seems like an eternal trinity these days, the GOP, abortion and religion, but it was very much constructed in the late 20th century. Remember that <PERSON> was really an evangelical. And if you look to earlier religious discussion of abortion, the positions were actually a lot more mixed and certainly not nearly so much a central voting pillar.\n\nThen it was the Tea Party, a group they more or less created themselves around the idea of an anti tax protest, but that contained dog whistles for a lot of less savory and defensible positions than just not liking taxes. It included an outlet for angry racists who unlike the batch in the 60s desperately didn't want to admit to being racist, conspiracy theorists and people deeply distrustful of \"the system\" but willing to be selective when the people who made up \"the system\" had an (R) next to their name.\n\nAnd in the last four years we get Qanon, pizzagate, proud boys, Unite the right, \"Fake Newsers\".\n\nIt's all a natural progression and it was inevitable. In some ways we're lucky they coalesced around such a dumb grifter instead of one of the scheming ice cold psychopaths who have been engineering this whole game. My biggest concern is that they're way past the point of no return to go back to the conservative values they abandoned so far back. They created a base that doesn't want that and they're afraid of their Frankenstein's monster. So I'm shuddering to think where this goes next.", "604" ], [ "> I think we will need $6 trillion next year to keep the country afloat, and I think we will get this with the <PERSON> admin. \n\nDepends entirely on the Georgia race. The president can't disburse massive amounts of money on their own authority. Congress holds the purse strings.\n\nIf the GOP retains control of the senate, given their obstruction of the last democratic president, I would not be at all surprised if they adopted a policy of obstructing any <PERSON> led efforts to help shore up and rebuild our economy because they would LOVE to be able to claim the economy failed under <PERSON> and they are sociopathic enough to make sure it happens.", "953" ], [ "Most of the things that we consider \"good\" behavior evolved either biologically (things like mirror neurons) or culturally (particular practices and values.\n\nThose tendencies survived and replicated because they were advantageous.\n\nThey were advantageous because we're a VERY social species.\n\nBeing nice to those around you means you can work together, it means they're more likely to reciprocate when you have a need, it means we're able to specialize because we can count on cooperation.\n\nIt's true for big \"natural rights\" like life, liberty and property, and for small niceties like remembering birthdays. All other things being equal, treating others well increases the chances of them treating you well, treating them poorly increases the chances that negative reciprocation or a lack of the positive things you may need and want.\n\nSo it isn't really a question of whether good behavior on average generates good outcomes. The fact that it evolved and survived is the proof that it leads to good outcomes. If it didn't, we likely wouldn't have come to value it.\n\nAnd of course, I'm talking about a social, emergent kind of karma, not a supernatural, cosmic sort.\n\nDoes it work in absolutely every case? Of course not. Are there exceptions and other social forces and changes capable of short circuiting it? Of course. But just because it can be circumvented sometimes does not mean it doesn't exist.\n\nFriction exists even though lubrication can overcome it.", "931" ], [ "Does karma require 100% effectiveness in each and every case?\n\nCertainly some people do terrible things and reap enough wealth and power to do whatever they want, and being sociopaths, they don't care that they cause harm or miss the genuine human connection of being a caring person.\n\nThose people are certainly a small minority, and even if many don't necessarily suffer consequences, they're also high on the list to get assassinated or sold out by their similarly sociopathic coconspiritors.\n\nJust because a bad outcome isn't guaranteed for each and every person who causes suffering, doesn't mean there is no karma. It just tends to work more though the odds and some assholes get lucky.\n\nTrue and complete sociopaths are somewhat rare. We've probably got a lot more narcisicists like <PERSON>, who I assure you is miserable and will continue to be so, whether or not he continues to be wealthy and stay out of jail.", "944" ], [ "I like to use food analogies to look closely at social ideas while getting away from the baggage.\n\nBear with me.\n\nWhen I look at a menu and something makes me salivate or order, or get excited to eat it, it's because of an expectation I have that I will enjoy eating it. This is a very visceral experience, but it isn't divorced from values, ideas or thought that we hold.\n\nFor instance, I love lo mein noodles. But if I watch that scene in Lost Boys where the noodles turn into worms, they're not so appetizing anymore.\n\nWhen I was a kid, I didn't like cauliflower. I may have had it prepared badly or just had underdeveloped tasebuds, whatever the reason, i hated it.\n\nEven as my tastes expanded and I came to enjoy more veggies, I would still see cauliflowe or notice on a menu it was part of a dish and that dish would not be appetizing to me. But eventually, I had some indian dish where I didn't expect it and it tasted good AND had cauliflower in it. What? I had simply been prejudiced and expected the veggie to be unenjoyable, and my prejudice led me away from many potentially positive experiences.\n\nLike whether we find a dish appetizing, whether we find a person attractive is visceral, but that doesn't mean it's uneffected by ideas and yes, prejudices. Now having preferences doesn't necessarily make you racist. I might have legitimately not enjoyed the flavor of cauliflower. I think it's worth some self reflection to ask whether prejudices color your attraction.", "530" ], [ "If we fully considered them publishers, then they would have to vet every single message and media that goes up online to make sure it isn't IP infringement, defamation, incitement, violation of recording consent, and on and on and on.\n\nThose are standards we hold publishers to. If Random House put content in a book, or the New York Times put it into an issue and it created liability in any of a large number of ways, that publisher could be successfully sued. For that reason, publishers are very careful with what they publish. They have teams of lawyers go over it.\n\nThe amount of volume on social media is just massive in comparison to what any publisher handles, aand instead of being created by a small, prevetted stable of content creators, it's created by every human with a computer.\n\nIf they somehow had the army of lawyers and checkers necessary to allow anything resembling a tiny fraction of the current volume to be published on their sites, the only way they could keep safe from liability would be to become absolutely draconian in what they allow to be posted. You absolutely, 100% would not get to post politically controversial content.\n\nBut in reality, the vetting team needed even for that would be logistically and financially impossible. Most would either fold, or switch to a model more like record companies where they're not social media at all, just another venue for a finite vetted stable of content producers.\n\nWhat this would not accomplish, by any means or in any way or by any stretch of the imagination is creating more freedom for individuals to share things. It would unquestionably and inherently do the exact opposite.", "106" ], [ "I suppose it depends what you mean by \"acting like a publisher\"\n\nActually acting like a publishher would be doing all of the vetting that I described and more. That's what publishers do. Social media does not now do that.\n\nPublishers select relatively small amounts of content from relatively small amounts of vetted contributors, check it for quality and legality.\n\nThe largest umbrella book publisher, Penguin/random House manages 250 imprints and brands across five continents, and they only release about 15000 new titles a year.\n\nThere are about 720,000 hours of content uploaded to YouTube every day.\n\nPublishers aren't the only sort of organizations that care about content within their space. Walk into a shop or a museum and start singing a song about your penis at the top of your lungs. Most spaces make some decisions about kinds of speech they don't want to happen in their private spaces. That doesn't make them a publisher of the speech that they do allow, it simply means they put some limits on how they allow their space to be used.", "215" ], [ "By extreme, you seem to mean a major deviation from the norm.\n\nIf it's totally mentally healthy to go along with Nazi Germany because their beliefs and actions within their society are the norm, it would be a bit extreme within that context to believe <PERSON> was a horrible dictator and that Jews were human beings like anyone else who deserved to live as your neighbors. Such a person would be exhibiting a great deviation from the local norm. Would that be a mental defect?", "743" ], [ "It might depend a little bit on the model you chose to use to define what a mental illness IS.\n\nRight now, some of the most popular models, including the one used by the DSM focus on harm. If your mental state brings you distress or creates a disability in living a reasonably contented life, then we might label it as a disorder.\n\nIt's not objective. There is no model of the platonic normal brain that it deviates from. The question is more or less whether the way your brain works makes you or those in your society unhappy.\n\nSo by that standard, it very much is relative and won't necessarily correlate with what you and I, or any other random observer in a particular place and time would say is desirable or normal.\n\nHumans are social animals and we have a set of basic physical and emotional needs. If your brain isn't significantly getting in the way of filling those needs, you're not crazy.\n\nAnd historically, that means plenty of people have been wildly factually wrong, and harmful to certain others without fitting this model of mental illness.", "338" ], [ "I'll tell you what. I admire your confidence. I have equal confidence that you're incorrect. How confident are you?\n\nLet's check in January 21st.\n\nIf I'm correct, and <PERSON> has been sworn in, you promise to make a donation to Planned Parenthood, $10.\n\nIf you're correct and by Jan 21st <PERSON> has not been sworn in, then I'll happily make a $10 donation to the legitimate 501c3 non profit of your choice.\n\nNow if you're as confident as you seem, this should be a no brainer to agree with, correct? There would be no risk of you having to donate to PP and you would be directing a little bit of money to some charity you think is worthy. You up for it?", "974" ], [ "It seems unlikely to me that a woman seeking an abortion would change her mind because financial support from medicaid wouldn't cover it.\n\n\"I wanted to abort, but I can't afford it so I'll have a baby instead... That seems cheaper\".\n\nIt would mostly make women who need an abortion a little poorer, deeper in debt, or beholden to someone. Since nearly 40% of Americans can't afford a surprise $500 expense, and that's around the median abortion price, I can see that having a negative effect on a lot of already vulnerable women.\n\nAnd if anyone somehow DID choose not to abort because of lack of funding, now we have a kid being raised by someone super poor and not smart enough to either find a way to get 500 bucks, or to recognize that a kid costs more. Who didn't want the kid. Maybe some of these will turn out to be hallmark card, <PERSON>, loving homes, but probably you're looking at a fair number of terrible upbringings and early pregnancies continuing a cycle.\n\nI think if we really want fewer abortions, things like comprehensive sex education and wide availability of contraception do a lot more. Specifically, I think the US needs to destigmatize IUDs.", "409" ], [ "It seems far more extraordinary to me that humans, who vary in so many ways should have a metabolism that throughout a 24 hour period uses the exact same amount of energy within the calorie value of half an apple slice. The person I responded to affirmatively declares that variation in human metabolism doesn't exceed 5 calories per day\n\nThe person I'm responding to is certainly making a positive claim. They're couching it in scientific certainty. It's not common knowledge and it's extraordinary. If you're saying that doesn't carry any burden what you're saying is that it should be accepted without supporting evidence.", "516" ], [ "Now hold on a sec. Just looking at 2019.\nGlass was a sequel/offshoot. Detective Pikachu very clearly draws on an existing popular franchise. What Men Want was a gender switched remake of What Women Want. Doctor Sleep was a sequel to The Shining. Little Women has already been adapted before. I'm not familiar with all of your titles, but a significant amount of them seem to be the sort of thing OP is complaining about.\n\nEDIT: Just looking into a few more. After seems to be an adaptation of a book expanded from a fanfiction. The two horror films sound a lot like a whole lot of other standardized horror films. The musician biopic is part of a recent pack of similar biopics. I know I'm getting farther from very directly derivative works and there's no absolute hard line, but I'd say the 2019 crop of movies you're listing is not a great argument for the overall freshness of the stuff making it to production.", "472" ], [ "Yeah, I can see where that's going and there's some validity to the idea.\n\nThat said, I see Palm Springs as a lot closer to a remake of Groundhog Day than most of the other films in the category. It's in many ways closer in tone, structure etc. Sure it has its significant divergences but if we see it as a piece within a GD genre, it owes more to the original than most.", "472" ], [ "For one thing, I think you're a bit confused about how a nul claim works in a practical sense in a casual conversation.\n\nFor instance, if you claim that everyone who lives in Wyoming is the exact same height, and I claim that their height varies. Between reasonable people there isn't an expectation that the first claim of no varience should be accepted until a high degree of scientific proof otherwise. We're not coming into this conversation naked and without priors.\n\nI think the \"board game rules\" approach to rules of logic and discourse tends to miss some of the finer context points in what appropriate or realistic expectations might look like. \n\nFor instance:\n\nPoster One: Black swans never exist, all swans are white.\n\nPoster Two: I was on vacation in Nepal last year and I saw a black swan.\n\nPoster One: That's impossible, all swans are white. It's scientifically proven.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nNow both posters are making claims, and if they wish the other to accept them, both claims might require some backup. The person claiming to have seen a black swan could be lying, or they could be mistaken and have seen a swan in shadow, or a swan covered in oil, or a black duck they thought was a swan. But in casual social setting, not a peer reviewed journal or a televised debate, we generally accept that people have and share direct experiences. We don't have to accept them as true, but we can understand why people accept their own experience. And in this sort of exchange, someone claiming to know clearly and with justification a peer reviewed truth should be able to share that in a way someone who had a direct experience has not represented that they already have.\n\nFurther Example.\n\nPoster One: It is illegal to sell tuna fish in the United States.\n\nPoster Two: Dude, I just bought tuna at the market last week. I've seen it for sale in every grocery store I've ever been in.\n\nThe first poster is couching their claim in legal certainty, so legal sources would seem appropriate to back up their claim. The second poster is describing a common occurance of direct experience.", "76" ], [ "You're still misunderstanding my position.\n\nI'm not saying that personal anecdote should be accepted as fact. Like I said, I could be lying, I could be mistaken. \n\nBut when one person says \"X is an incontrovertable scientific fact\" and someone else counters \"That hasn't been my personal experience\" then asking the first person for scientific corroboration is asking them to present what they say they already have. Asking the second person is telling them to embark on an in depth research project that they're not even claiming to have done.\n\nThat doesn't mean that the second person's claim should be accepted as fact, but one is a much more reasonable ask in a social situation than the other. You can dismiss my personal experience, that's fine. But you can't say I have a moral or logical obligation to undertake a research project to assure that my personal experience is backed up by peer reviewed science.", "569" ], [ "Not the person you responded to, but I was going to post something similar to what they did.\n\nI think in context, when a number of red flags appear one can have some reason to consider those criticisms have roots in some kind of bigotry.\n\nI'd say that criticism that's uneven and \"just happens\" to fall along the lines of bigotted categories can be one red flag. When behavior in one country is ignored, and in another country it's criticized, there should be a good reason to be so selective.\n\nWhen criticism of a particular country falls into the territory of longstanding negative stereotypes around those people.\n\nWhen criticism is extended to generalizations about the people of a country rather than just the government.\n\nYou make an exception for vulgar language, but I think word choice, including vulgarity can be another very important strong red flag. For instance, <PERSON>'s \"Shithole countries\" remarks should cause alarm. But even non-profane critical words can be a tip off. If someone living in the west is criticizing an African country and continually insists on words that align with old racist stereotypes abotu Africa, that should send up a red flag too.\n\nI would agree with you that some countries and their supporters abroad can be too quick to try to shoot down reasonable criticism by labelling it as bigotted. But the opposite occurs as well, criticism drawing from or made to appeal to bigotry being excused as reasonable critique.", "16" ], [ "I think you might find that working on your personal issues around black men (and around porn) is going to be better for your personal well being and marriage prospects than keeping this on your values list and monitoring a potential wife for the skin color of her friends.\n\nIf this issue is important enough to you that you list it in the #2 thing you value in a life partner, then things you're picking up from porn are having an outsized effect on your mental well-being. There are so many important issues for compatibility that if this is taking up enough space in your day to day thinking, you may benefit from some therapy.\n\nThey're a mixed bag in a lot of ways, but if porn is having such an effect on your thinking, you might want to take a look at r/nofap as well.", "518" ], [ "I agree plumbing the grey areas of an idea is a good way to see what it's made of.\n\n > Is it because of religious symbolism?\n\nA broader category might be items or symbols that have a deep importance and an in-culture expectation of respectful treatment and sometimes particular rules for use. Religious imagery often qualifies for that, so do things like military honors or personal significance.\n\nI would expect some members of the US military community to feel offense if someone made purple heart dangly earrings as a teen fashion craze.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Is the adoption of a collared shirt or necktie across the world (which is primarily a british invention) also cultural appropriation by the same vein? \n\nThere are a few important ways that spreading of western standard dress norms is dissimilar from problematic kinds of missappropriation. For one, western dress norms were spread intentionally by the cultures they originated in. Not just intentionally, by sometimes forcefully. They're also not sacred or of comparable types of deep importance. And most people adopting that style of dress are doing so reasonably within the expected norms. \n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Just want to understand if you see it as one-directional and whether there are specific boundaries other than \"part of a tribe\" or something. \n\nThere are a few directional and in-group/out group concerns that tend to come up when looking at how culture spreads between groups. One example, when a particular group is not overall well treated or well thought of by a larger majority group, but some aspect of the culture of the minority group is monetized in a big way that the minority group is excluded from.\n\nFor instance (and I'll use a pure hypothetical, just to create clear boundaries)\n\nImagine the Abba people were immigrant minorities in a country mostly populated by Babba people. Babba people largely hold negative stereotypes about Abba people. Abba people can't get business loans partly because they experience discrimination from Babba people. Babba people love some elements of Abba cuisine though, and some enterprising Babba entrepeneurs open up a huge chain of Abba themed restaurants. Maybe some Abba people get hired as busboys and dishwashers, but millions and millions in profit flow to the Babba owners of the restaurant in a country where most <PERSON> can't afford to open more than a tiny hole in the wall.\n\nI can see how many Abba people in such a situation could see that as a negative.", "972" ], [ "Not entirely. Note the example of the purple heart medal. The US military may be in some ways the least oppressed group in the world (at least as an institution) but something important to them could still be misappropriated.\n\nAs a general trend, majority cultures are more likely to not just willingly spread, but pressure minority cultures to adopt their dress, language, food, religion and other norms. There's not much question of appropration in that kind of context because what's given or forced can't reasonably be seen as having been stolen.", "227" ], [ "I'm saying the practical benefits of making such public structures illegal could meet or exceed the practical benefits of having such a structure.\n\nAs you say, the structure is there so that a homeless person can sleep in a warm place.\n\nThrow is a meal or two while in custody and you're coming out ahead.\n\nI suppose the specifics around enforcement could do a better or worse job at providing that, but within a police force that's at least somewhat sypathetic to homeless people (as some but not all can be) it can be a net positive. I have reason to believe that some departments policies during winter months involve arrests of homeless people for their own comfort and safety during dangerously cold temperatures.", "681" ], [ "> \\ > I couldn’t have got that job because of my criminal record. \n\nAre you certain that's the case? Felony conviction could pose a risk to employability, but I doubt unauthorized shelter construction is a felony. Particular jobs might care about particular kinds of infractions. \n\nBut practically, I'm fairly certain that when it comes to infractions like this against homeless people, many police departments can use their discretion to release without pressing charges. I very highly doubt that enforcement of these laws regularly results in any sort of conviction.\n\nI say all of this as a person who has been arrested in the past and has applied to and gotten many jobs involving a background check, including jobs working closely with children.", "681" ], [ "I don't know your employers, it's not impossible.\n\nBut in general, there are relatively few doors that are closed by an arrest without a conviction for violating a statute that isn't a felony, isn't violent, isn't theft related, isn't drug related etc etc.\n\nI'd guess that on average a resume gap while homeless or the outstanding medical bills from frostbite might be more of an issue for future prospects than this particular arrest. But then again, as I said to another poster, my position is influenced being in the Northeast, where winter temperatures can be deadly, and there's a body count for people in improvised structures. In a milder climate, I'd be less likely to support such a policy.", "679" ], [ "I don't think it's an insane thought. About 20% of homeless people have a similar thought.\n\n[_URL_0_](_URL_0_)\n\nWe're discussing what are city level ordinances. Cities don't control the policies that fund the private prison industry. That's higher up the food chain. If we were talking what the ideal utopian system would be that overhauled all the laws on every level, sure, defunding private prisons and building more homeless housing, both shelters and other options, transitional housing, and more would be on the list. \n\nI'm looking at this from the same small local level where these particular ordinances are written. And I'm looking at this as someone who lives in a part of the country that becomes deadly cold for a finite period of time in the winter where some people cannot, or will not go to shelters, and some number of those people freeze to death or lose things to frostbite in improvised shelters.", "681" ], [ "Freezing to death doesn't seem like a big win either.\n\nThere are about half a million homeless people in the US at any given time.\n\nAs you might expect, they are heavily clustered in parts of the country where it's warmer.\n\nThere are about 700 deaths of homeless people every year from hypothermia. That's not even counting serious medical injuries from cold. Those 700 are not happening among the majority of the homeless population who live in warmer areas. The people sleeping in shelters are not dying of hypothermia there. I'll leave you to work out the risk rate for the very small share of that half a million left who end up sleeping outside in freezing temperatures, in makeshift shelters.", "681" ], [ "I don't think too many other regular CMV posters live in your country or are super familiar with all the facets of how things work there.\n\nBut as far as the term privilege goes, the term wasn't just coined to categorize any advantage. As used in academics and activism, \"privilege\" as a concept normally is meant to point out disparities that are invisible to people who don't experience them. In fact, it was coined in a book called \"White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack\".\n\nThe general idea (rooted mostly in an American cultural and historical context) is that non white people tend to face a number of specific disadvantages, burdens etc that white people mostly don't face and mostly don't notice. The goal of the term and the discussion around it was to help white people who wanted to be allies become aware of disparities they benefit from that they may not have put much thought or consideration into.\n\nYou're in a country with different demographics and different history than the US, so valid applications of the idea of privilege SHOULD look different to you than they do in the US. But if your meaning of it shifts too far, the term becomes meaningless and useless.\n\nSo I can ask you to answer a question that you're in a better place to answer than I am. Is the affirmative action you're talking about invisible to most who benefit from it? Is it part of a wider system of benefits that exist within your society that creates broader meaningful disparities of power and outcome to the detriment of the people lacking this privilege?\n\nIf so, then it might be an appropriate term.", "205" ], [ "Taste is subjective, and there's nothing wrong with that. What your list suggest to me is that you personally prefer the often heavier, saucier, sweeter American versions of things. Nothing wrong with that. I like a lot of Americanized foods.\n\nMy SO is Mexican and when she came here for college, pretty much everything she ate here tasted too sweet. Even the varieties of vegetables we grow here are sweeter.\n\nAll that said, how many exceptions does it take?\n\nYou've already ceded French and Italian. I personally consider authentic chicken in black mole to be a religious experience. I was kind of agnostic on Mexican and Tex Mex in the states, but when I visit Mexico, I cannot eat enough of pretty much everything.\n\nI would find it hard to argue that any American Japanese food comes close to super fresh sushi in Japan. I feel blessed to have had the opportunity to try that. \n\nMore authentic Chinese food is probably less to American tastes, but while I like the American stuff as junk food, it's all sugar and grease. The best chinese meals I''ve had have been dining with Chinese friends who knew what to order at less Americanized places.\n\nThe only one on your list I can't speak to directly is Indian, but haven't we already covered a lot?", "738" ], [ "It's important to be clear what's meant by \"most popular\". It's not the same thing as a plurality. Polls that are single choice will show the same thing that a FPTP election. When I talk about popularity, I mean exactly what I said in my example, that someone who is the first choice out of five of 30% of voters and the last choice out of five for the other 70% would win if the votes were more or less evenly split.\n\nIt's a bit hard to show that in retrospect because we don't do much ranked choice polling, so it would need to be extrapolated from other social information at the time. Since we're not talking about the 2016, and <PERSON> was clearly hugely popular in the elections before that, we'd have to go pretty far back in time and argue a lot of subjective things. I'm not too interested in that rabbit hole.\n\nThe fact is emergent and mathematical, it doesn't need historical corroboration because it's simple math. Vote splitting is not a controversial phenomena.\n\nIf a populist in either party has a plurality, they can win even if they're the last choice of the majority.\n\nWe can see a reasonable parallel in <PERSON>. He certainly won the plurality of polling, but the people who didn't poll for him at the time didn't seem to be ranking him a close second. Look at the things prominent members of the party were saying about him during the primaries.", "92" ], [ "I think predicting the future of politics is at best a party game.\n\nThings change, and if it were predictable, we wouldn't need to wait for elections to see the results, and <PERSON> would have been out of a job sooner.\n\nPeople make predictions, and SO many factors play a part that it isn't hard to come up with plausible sounding justifications. And some number of them will have been right. \n\nIf you randomly guessed a coin flip, and repeated it 100 times, you'd likely get about half of them right.\n\nIf you had enough people guessing randomly, you'd start to see some of them getting all 100, and if you didn't know better, you'd think they were GREAT at predicting coin flips. But it's just statistics.\n\nMake guesses where you have a little information and you start to see even more people who seem always right, even if they're essentially just lucky. Happens in the stock market, happens in political predictions.\n\nIs AOC too far left for the party?\n\nParties change over time. <PERSON> talked about amnesty, paths to citizenship, stuff that would be branded the most bleeding heart disgusting open border talk nowadays. Yet they still hold him up as a great conservative idol while trash talking positions he held when democrats even come near them.\n\n<PERSON> was publicly against gay marriage and <PERSON> and <PERSON> were very into being tough on crime.\n\nAOC is pretty young, and careers can last a LOONG time. Look at the septegenarians we're riddled with.", "134" ], [ "The thing is, whether all the tickets/consoles or whatever are bought out by bots, people who scalp full time, or people just reselling one, the effect is the same. They're all acting as middlemen who only add the value of convenience to rich people while making an option less available to dedicated people with less money.\n\nIs it necessarily evil?\n\nEh, that requires a comparison of specifics. If it's the only way you can pay your bills or feed your kid, I could see the need outweighing the harm.\n\nBut at a baseline, it's a harmful act, so it's only mitigated by need in the same way other harmful acts might be. It makes the world a worse place. And even if they're only playing a very small roll in making the world a worse place, they're still playing a role.\n\nIt's a bit like asking if littering is wrong if you only drop something small. Just because big companies pollution is a much bigger issue, doesn't mean you're not a jerk for dumping your starbucks cup in the middle of the park.", "23" ], [ "I don't fully agree with OP, but Home depot like most large stores are a gridded design. They're also mostly single level stores with exits at multiple places along one wall. In fact, IIRC, there are generally exits to the outside along all outer walls if you include emergency exits and the exit through the plant nursery It might require a lot of thought to find a specific doodad, but you can thoughtlessly find the front wall of the store and an exit. You walk in one door and walk out a door that's right next to it. They're called \"Big Box\" stores for a reason.\n\nYou don't need signs to find the exterior wall.\n\nMost Ikeas I've been in are at least two levels, with the entrance being on a separate level from where you spendmost of your shopping time. In fact, i can't say whether this is universal, but I believe the Ikeas I have visited had you enter on one level, take an escalator up to a higher level to look at furniture, then down stairs or escalators two levels to go through home goods and an elevator to go back up to the original parking level with your stuff.\n\nI'm absolutely sure Ikea complies with all local safety laws, I'm sure there are lighted exit signs. I also know in an emergency, not everyone is always good at looking for signs and I'd wager, whether you ultimately call it the store's fault or the customers, that if an alarm started ringing and the stores started filling up with smoke, the customers in a big box are going to find the exit and be outside faster.", "62" ], [ "Consider <PERSON> argument in \"In defense of abortion\".\n\nIf fetuses are a class of people who depend on a specific womb for survival, and that need creates a moral obligation from the person whose womb that is and a moral right that the fetus possesses, then we could imagine other situations with a similar dependency, which ought to create the same moral obligations, no?\n\nImagine you wake up and strapped to your back is a famous violinist. He has a rare kidney disease that can only be treated by human to human dialysis. You just happened to be the only blood type match close enough to perform the procedure on in time to save his life. His fans hooked him up to you while you slept. He was unconscious at the time and is as surprised as you are. If he is unhooked, he will die within seconds.\n\nSo now, we have another human who has a particular need to sustain his life. He needs to be attached to your kidneys. Are you morally obligated to remain attached?", "626" ], [ "I guess I'm trying to understand what qualities of existing in a womb create a moral obligation from the mother.\n\nIt seemed like you were saying the relevant quality was that they needed that particular womb to live.\n\nI gave you a parallel case in which an individidual needed another specific human to live.\n\nIs there a different quality of fetuses or wombs that you meant to refer to?", "626" ], [ "Have you ever heard the phrase \"Science advances funeral by funeral?\" That's true for any major change.\n\nYou are absolutely correct that you don't change someone's mind by insulting them.\n\nBut in reality, you don't change someone's mind much at all. I'm sure there are plenty of heartwarming stories of people who showed juuuust the right blend of love and education to reason people out of an entreched position.\n\nAnd people DO change their minds about things.\n\nBut overall, that's not how public opinion changes. People don't make their decisions rationally. On balance, opinions change because the people who held the old ones died. Or because enough of them died that social norms shifted and people shifted to keep up with the new norms of communities they wanted to participate in.\n\nWe didn't get the level of acceptance for LGBTQ people we have now (67% think gay marriage should be recognized by law) by making loving and rational arguments to homophobes. We got here by creating a culture where new young people are regarded as assholes if they're homophobic and the old homophobes died.\n\nWe're not going tochange the minds of the antivax idiots no matter what we throw at them. The solution is to make sure that their kids understand it's a dumb and schmucky position and don't continue it so when they die (some of them from preventable diseases) the next generation won't continue their dumbass ideas.", "30" ], [ "I mean, of course it would be better to change the parent's mind.\n\nThat's just a very rare thing, and it isn't the mechanism that's going to create the much needed broader change.\n\nPeople who choose to embrace dangerous and out there ideas change their minds juuuust enough to be the subject of a few heartwarming videos on YouTube or a random infotainment show. The overwhelming majority wont, no matter what you do.\n\nBut the enough of their kids, when they learn (like all kids do) that what their parents believe is dumb and lame, will form other beliefs while they're still squishy unformed people.", "151" ], [ "Mostly, people mourn based on how much we'll miss someone more than whatever judgements we'd place on them.\n\nI suppose we could get into whether it's healthy to mourn celebrities the way we do, but that doesn't have much to do with how they died.\n\nIf your brother died, you'd probably mourn. It doesn't matter if it was a car accident, cancer or a drug overdose. Mourning is an expression of loss, not a referendom on the responsibility for their death.", "168" ], [ "It means putting a lot of energy into the unlikely possibility of tiny local victories (which will not come) is a waste of effort.\n\nIf you want to save lives by convincing people who already think they've done extensive research to vaccinate themselves and their kids, you'd save more lives per calorie burned by instead getting another part time job and sending the money to a mosquito net program in a country plagued with malaria.\n\nIf you happen to have a close friend or relative who has a special relationship to you, you're welcome to try, but even that is unlikely.\n\nIf we want the next generation to know better, helping spread through the culture the very true idea that their parents ideas are super dumb is probably going to be more effective in the long run.\n\nYoung people decide not to continue their adult life in their parents' religions not because there are kind and patient atheists knocking at their door with a smile and a pamphlet, but because they realize those ideas are dumb. That's been how young people reject their parents' ideas since the dawn of time.", "929" ], [ "That's one reason, which is sometimes justified,. But some places have tap water that's fine and people still consume a lot of bottled water there.\n\nIn some cases it's a convenience in some cases it's just a bad habit, in some cases it's ignorance in people who don't know that tap water is fine.\n\nAltogether though, there's room to consume a lot fewer bottles", "594" ], [ "> But did anybody change their actual beliefs because of shaming? \n > \n > Speaking personally, I have never changed my mind about anything just because my old view has become 'shameful'.\n\nI'm not saying they do.\n\nPeople who have fully formed opinions as adults that they think are considered, moral or justified by research very rarely change them for any reason.\n\nBut young people who don't have fully formed opinions DO form them initially around cultural norms, and those norms include what is publicly shamed. In fact the ubiquity of public shaming of homosexuality is a substantial part of why previous generations adopted homophobia as they formed their core values and beliefs.\n\nYou can't argue that young people's values and beliefs aren't partly formed by avoiding what they think is lame.", "418" ], [ "The core of the new funding model is spending that budget in other ways. That hasn't happened.\n\nAnd Minneapolis's new budget doesn't include fewer officers. The article is very clear about that, as it was a point of high contention.\n\nSo I don't think a year with high crime in the middle of a pandemic and social unrest, with a traditional budget in place is much of a test of a new budget that hasn't been implemented yet.", "582" ], [ "Sales taxes are added onto a purchase price and collected directly from a consumer.\n\nIf I'm a shop, I get to advertise my widget at $5.99 regardless of what the tax rates are. Customers look at the sales price, which more or less react to the market, then the customer and only the customer, pays that sales tax.\n\nAnd as others have mentioned, because lower income people spend a greater percentage of their money on goods subject to sales tax, that becomes regressive.\n\nAs it stands, we tax corporate profits, not their revenue, which means I can set up a shell company in a a country with no income tax, call them a consultant, have my company with a lot of revenue in the US pay them a \"Consulting\" fee equal to my revenue and pay zero corporate taxes because I technically have no profit. The actual she'll game is more complicated, but that's the idea. \n\nThe basic takeaway is that for a big, unscrupulous company, profits are not really taxable, because they'll always find a loophole. In that way, corporate taxes on profits could be called regressive because the huge companies can get out of paying it, and small businesses who don't have super high paid \"creative\" accountants end up paying.\n\nRevenue could be seen as an improvement because you can't make revenue disappear the way you can profits and still be technically legal. In that way, a revenue tax would include those big ticket companies and not put that whole tax burden on small ones who try to play fair.\n\nNow one might be concerned that a revenue tax would land squarely on consumers because the companies would just pass it along, and it would function like sales tax. That's a fair concern. \n\nBut a few things, depending on implementation, make it better. To the extent that it could be passed to consumers, current coporate income tax on profits could be as well. And a few things shift in ways that lend to being more progressive than current taxes.\n\n Small AND large businesses would now be taxable. Large ones couldn't skate by any more. And if we're raising a similar amount of revenue but now including those large company transactions, the rate would be VERY low compared to the income taxes small business is currently paying, evening out the advantage of scale large business currently has and boosting small local business. If big business doesn't want to lose their current advantage, with prices set by the market, they'd have to eat the tax from profits and not pass it to the consumer.\n\nIf regulations are such that, like income tax and not sales tax revenue tax can't be added on at the point of sale, then there's another disincentive to pass it on the way we do sales tax.\n\nRevenue tax would also include a great number of services that don't currently pay sales tax and may depending on their creativity, pay little or no corporate tax.\n\nWe can keep going, but the takeaway is that in a number of ways, taxing revenue ends up being less regressive as a whole economic effect than sales or corporate income taxes.", "322" ], [ "My unpopular opinion. It doesn't matter if reaching across the aisle is doomed. We have to do it anyway.\n\nIf we want to move this country forward, we need to move beyond the current and growing attitude that seems to held on the right and left that the other side is insane and unredeemable wicked.\n\nEven to the extent that it's true, we can never get better by loudly proclaiming that and taking a \"Fuck the other side\" attitude to politics.\n\nI don't know exactly how we get better, but I know that writing off 40% of the country isn't how we regain sanity. Any path to a healthier future includes leaving the door for cooperation open even if right now they're too hopped up on obstructionism to use it.", "647" ], [ "> So taking monies for officers salaries and benefits to spend elsewhere. yeah, what could go wrong. \n\nI'm not entirely sure what specifically they're cutting. I'd imagine overtime hours would be high on the list though. The cut is about 4.5% of the yearly budget. I'm not certain how much Minneapolis specifically spends on overtime, but I believe it's a very substantial part of budgets for city police forces.\n\nBy paying other professionals, who aren't getting time and a half overtime pay and don't have quite the massively generous pension that police unions negotiate, you might actually get many more man-hours of service for the same total spending. Police are pretty pricey.\n\nAs for the general strategy. You said it yourself. The stats for the past year with standard spending on police have been terrible.\n\nIn a company, if a department that does a wide range of jobs is not doing them well, they might pay more to train that department, sure. They might also send some of that work to a different or new department with the more specialized training and culture to handle those tasks, leaving the original department to concentrate on the more narrow range of what they're best at.\n\nIt's not a radical idea. Businesses and other parts of government do it frequently. It's just thinking about specialization.\n\nThis only looks like a problem if you start from the assumption that all of the tasks we currently put on police officers are perfectly and eternally things that can only be done by police officers.", "582" ], [ "I will note, there's no guarantee Minneapolis's program is going to be successful. Just like any policy it can be implemented well or poorly. In their case a lot of the details are either up to people who don't want to see the policy succeed or are an attempt at compromise which can water down any effect.\n\nJust like there's no guarantee that any given police department operating under the current model will do well next year.", "582" ], [ "The Expected Family Contribution takes into account whether or not you're dependent on your parents. if you are not dependent on them, then the EFC has zero to do with them.\n\nYou can look at the criteria in more detail in the pdf at the link under \"What’s the Expected Family Contribution (EFC)?\" here:\n\n[_URL_0_](_URL_0_)\n\nThere is a list of criteria, any one of which makes you an independent student. the very first item on the list for next year is being born before Jan 1st. 1998. Essentially, any student over 22 is automatically considered independent. The second item on the list is whether the student is married.\n\nIf you used EFC formula A, then you used the incorrect formula. You should be using Formula B or C depending on whether you yourself have dependents. The formula determines the amount you and your spouse might be expected to contribute and has nothing to do with your parents.\n\nIf you are over 22 (which you are) or Married (which you are), then the word \"family\" in \"expected family contribution\" means you and your spouse. \n\nSo no, the EFC is not BS, you have just significantly misunderstood it.", "789" ], [ "Do you really and truly believe there are only two ways to think of politics?\n\nHave you watched a primary debate? You've never seen two people disagree within a party?\n\nNow I wouldn't go so far as him as to make a blanket statement that \"right wing\" equals moron. But I will say that given <PERSON>'s record and his clear deficiencies, and his overwhelming support within the gop (I believe 90 something percent approval) and his high voter turnout, that the lion's share of self described \"right wing\" Americans have something to answer for.", "886" ], [ "I'm pretty liberal, but a lot of more liberal people I interact with have kneejerk reaction and are quick to buy stories that cast any standard villains from the liberal perspective as the bad guys without doing due diligence.\n\nYeah, there's a lot of heartless action from large businesses. But not every story about a corporate bad action is true, or without nuance.\n\nI don't hang out with as many conservatives in real life, but from social media, I'm guessing at least some of them are just as quick to buy a story that bashes THEIR preferred villains, so I guess it's just a human trait. \n\nBut liberals, claiming to be the side that's rational and above that automatic team mentality need to get better.", "348" ], [ "You should be happy to learn then, that under the current rules, being a veteran or active duty automatically makes you an independant student.\n\nI'm not sure if that was the case when you were in school, but if so, it's been fixed now.\n\nClick on the link in my first comment to OP and look at the linked PDF I referenced.\n\nUnder the list for \"What is the definition of an independent student?' Active duty is the 4th bullet point, veteran is the 5th.", "798" ], [ "I think they're in a weird place. \n\nThere is absolutely misinformation fanning some pretty serious flames in the US.\n\nAnd YouTube, along with Twitter and Facebook have been platforms for disseminating things that are both untrue and ultimately harmful to the country and people's psyches.\n\nThat said, I'm not sure banning the subject is the most effective intervention in this case.\n\nWhile there's nothing they could do to MAKE everyone hold hands and sing kumbaya, or make everyone better critical thinkers, this particular move plays to well into US right wing persecution complex.\n\nIf people want to share conspiracy theories, they'll do it.\n\nI think Youtube would do better to keep their algorithyms from flooding people with this stuff. I'll admit, I don't know the details of how much has been done since they identified the radicalizing effect of their algorythm in the past, but there is a simple intervention.\n\nIf you watch a political video, the algorithym ignores it. It doesn't recommend more \"similar\" videos, it certainly doesn't autoplay more. You watch a political conspiracy theory, it recommends a nice calming cookie recipe next.", "999" ], [ "Large corporations are very much against minimum wage increases.\n\nEconomies of scale mean that proportionally, larger businesses spend more money on labor than other overhead like rent or supplies. For instance, something like 80% of walmart's operating budget goes to wages. And again because of their economies of scale, this is almost entirely low wage labor that would be subject to a minimum wage increase. Comparatively, typical small brick and mortar businesses spend more like 15-20% of operating budget on wages.", "466" ], [ "I think the concern is that with limited supplies, people at lower risk jump the line when many people at higher risk are still unvaccinated.\n\nAcross a large population if this happens a lot, it would increase deaths and viral spread in the short term by slowing the rate at which frontline workers and vulnerable people have access.", "175" ], [ "Depends on your state. In NY and Florida, it's still difficult to get an appointment. To get one for my mom in FL who's 80, we had to have the whole family up at 6am for several rounds of appointment opening just to get into the booking system. I'm here in NY and my partner is eligible as an in person educator, but the only appointments she's been able to find available have been like five hours drive west of us.\n\nThings may be different in MA.", "401" ], [ "Yes and no. For a bunch of reasons the balance of landlords gas shifted of the last decades to a much lower concentration of small landlords who live in the building or neighborhood and have a relationship with their tenants.\n\nNot that small landlords can't be greedy, but I and my friends in the past have had several decent landlords who tried to keep their places affordable and had a relationship with their tenants, I've never heard of a corporate or absent landlord hesitating to make the decision that brings in the most money.\n\nYes, regulation plays a big role, but I wouldn't write off landlords playing a role here.", "224" ], [ "They can't sell at a loss indefinitely.\nI'm not saying a minimum wage would put Walmart out of business, but it would on balance lessen their advantage over smaller retailers. Their model is high volume, low margin, essentially subsidized by minimum wage labor making up the bulk of their expenses and taxpayers footing the bill with food stamps etc for their armies of workers below the poverty line.\n\nI don't know where you got the idea that minimum wage is good for big corporations or that they're pushing for them. Every bit of public evidence shows the opposite.", "466" ], [ "I think especially when were talking about kids, sex crimes CAN create psychological issues that can't be fixed. If someone steals from me or damages my property, that isn't a scar I'm going to wear for life.\n\nOne other important difference, someone who molests a child, that's not situational. They have some kind of inner drive to commit acts that create this lasting harm on the most vulnerable.\n\nIf someone had deep inner urges to stab children we'd probably feel similar, and we DO put people who seem to feel a compulsion to violence without provocation in a special category, serial killers for instance, not a group we go soft on.\n\nBut most other crime is at least somewhat situational. Most people convicted on manslaughter don't have a deep urge inside to kill more people. In fact, violent crime is overwhelmingly age correlated with somewhat low recidivism over time.", "94" ], [ "I don't think they were all necessarily white supremacists. Some were delusional, some were so hyperpartisan they were blinded to everything aside from fighting for their side, some were what you might call \"useful idiots\".\n\nI've seen no record that any were bothered by the white supremacist t-shirts, flags, symbols and slogans around them.\n\nBlack security forces mention how much they were called the 'n' word by this group and no one breaking in with them seemed to mind.\n\nThe Proud Boys have recently become more explicitly white supremacist in public messaging. They were talked about explicitly in the debates, and shortly before Jan 6th a bunch were involved with another event where many wore \"six million wasn't enough\" shirts.\n\nTheir presence and involvement in planning for the 6th was widely broadcast in the news and social media.\n\nSo the people involved who weren't themselves white supremacists would have to be either pretty ok with white supremacists, or massively ignorant and unobservant.\n\nI'm fine characterizing the event as a collection of racists, their friends and people who need serious mental health interventions.", "815" ], [ "I think you miss the bigger picture. Large retailers entire business model rests on high volume and thin margins subsidized by welfare. Raising the minimum cuts into that subsidy and transfers the cost to them. That wipes out their margin under their current model. They could temporarily take a loss and try to crush some number of current mom and pops, but the cutting away of their advantage is permanent. It's not about outlasting because it changes the competitive advantage of the economy of scale permanently in a way that's favorable to smaller businesses. It's not a silver bullet that robs them of ALL their power, but it cuts away one of the ways they game the system and is a net advantage for smaller retail.", "976" ], [ "The model that Walmart uses will become 70% more expensive to run. The model that your local small retailer uses will become more like 10% more expensive. And that's on top of Walmart being lower margin to begin with.\n\nYou've got some tinfoil hat vision that doesn't correlate with widely available information making it crystal clear that large retailers hate rising minimums and have been fighting them tooth and nail.", "466" ], [ "You could kinda say that's true in a technical twisty way, but charitable donations are the only place people use that language. Any other pre-tax spending technically costs them less in the same way.\n\nNo one ever says \"Sure they're paying that guy on staff 30k a year, but it's costing them less than that because they deduct it!\"\n\nCompany business spending, including charitable donations comes from pre-tax revenues and is deducted from taxable profits, in the same way that salaries and rent and business insurance is deducted. No one ever refers to those expenses as a savings because they aren't taxed.", "940" ] ]
470
[ 22658, 24409, 9431, 13276, 12448, 22663, 23543, 8386, 10390, 25483, 6739, 1463, 2916, 5915, 15992, 10921, 22503, 22318, 22853, 9643, 1614, 16292, 327, 16902, 13930, 7810, 24869, 11461, 3672, 1037, 2516, 21518, 9891, 15500, 9737, 12776, 985, 478, 19683, 10014, 5173, 15615, 8815, 25159, 18862, 23560, 24513, 24872, 4123, 24994, 18379, 23533, 4197, 5072, 16241, 20106, 5975, 8962, 2912, 11413, 22516, 2022, 3053, 12497, 7190, 11146, 23131, 23278, 12640, 13168, 20644, 19311, 1909, 5371, 18118, 19429, 21843, 19355, 12913, 5453, 21048, 6162, 2226, 11773, 11391, 22641, 23785, 21083, 23655, 24083, 24586, 3454, 25225, 24943, 12601, 21138, 5460, 17997, 14336, 2965, 21762, 18819, 21749, 6259, 8430, 8542, 1580, 16427, 13077, 5646, 20458, 12955, 7695, 10022, 2363, 19285, 17739, 15603, 1737, 24776, 594, 5471, 16209, 24295, 1795, 1245, 22104, 13867, 11412, 10469, 17053, 20705, 25084, 24148, 16819, 12072, 16033, 5782, 7034, 6012, 21433, 15709, 20437, 20146, 11972, 5582, 18632, 19092, 20830, 7700, 14901, 159, 4509, 2394, 23933, 9004, 1756, 16569, 7863, 13670, 25521, 17910, 20330, 5759, 681, 8122, 16463, 19702, 14515, 4387, 3257, 18313, 17210, 12604, 18770, 19484, 4055, 16472, 12902, 10327, 3469, 10386, 14485, 11129, 7608, 838, 1668, 18024, 23812, 1587, 11984, 14863, 18301, 8389, 12971, 19380, 14969, 20210, 7889, 5663, 19644, 3566, 18934, 5804, 24834, 16402, 18061, 2230, 8427, 11590, 25307, 7123, 911, 19032, 6596, 4366, 3793, 1745, 237, 12658, 22161, 17537, 9104, 22218, 24918, 7050, 19004, 11221, 18889, 13822, 10528, 13118, 21953, 1193, 7764, 1236, 9227, 24832, 4703, 24782, 6724, 21054, 21343, 1224, 21246, 11214, 16150, 4940, 21719, 22740, 16910, 16405, 20819, 13646, 21947, 2664, 22515, 24790, 16012, 24534, 17757, 25452, 21322, 23684, 313, 2663, 18467, 23523, 21158, 5493, 12977, 7738, 13537, 8379, 9551, 7795, 16960, 12937, 17054, 2118, 2564, 2081, 17548, 18754, 6006, 18452, 15441, 4740, 18881, 11278, 14226, 12871, 23766, 25306, 20811, 18272, 9913, 5653, 5257, 14627, 22140, 24930, 3421, 1818, 22394, 22828, 11280, 11192, 1887, 16348, 13288, 628, 9754, 6710, 15711, 13520, 17895, 450, 23299, 10090, 5209, 399, 17209, 5319, 14685, 3809, 14819, 20449, 25347, 18182, 8980, 15890, 17272, 12705, 12267, 21765, 4248, 1278, 5381, 19783, 5708, 17780, 9803, 14294, 10720, 24184, 15853, 3647, 8993, 12462, 22542, 9193, 16764, 17728, 23772, 21767, 4016, 4988, 12442, 10224, 18447, 2316, 12412, 17988, 14801, 8232, 11983, 20761, 12043, 21379, 10192, 8764, 10851, 10745, 14053, 19720, 23631, 22749, 9501, 17820, 92, 8077, 9815, 192, 14519, 13723, 8058, 1611, 13120, 19197, 8874, 21147, 20942, 20159, 1148, 22293, 2446, 22921, 23618, 12051, 10002, 17935, 775, 5695, 17802, 8582, 5554, 2375, 4102, 25404, 14635, 20436, 12897, 1464, 23042, 22392, 12073, 6510, 8118, 4327, 22315, 1417, 13219, 21120, 10881, 24367, 12102, 922, 6344, 5926, 11863, 1731, 3604, 15680, 23798, 20227, 10038, 20421, 7746, 1105, 16118, 17417, 5543, 22586, 1306, 17790, 20286, 1593, 9958, 8365, 21643, 21625, 4728, 1932, 9708, 18364, 1477, 20387, 23860, 11791, 18421, 18714, 19301, 13482, 22874, 11843, 1387, 20632, 18135, 10658, 18745, 7870, 5146, 17996, 12351, 17473, 22489, 7524, 23817, 18477, 7278, 1260, 14782, 25064, 3112, 22807, 4367, 5169, 2992, 12869, 17223, 8449, 6495, 9089, 4411, 5406, 8155, 17697, 2145 ]
reddit_dump_-protonsandneutrons-
[ [ "Mini-LED is local dimming. It is still a transmissive display and has nothing to do with micro-LED / OLED and thus is much cheaper to implement. Thus, a stop-gap on the way to increased contrast with LCD technology. \n\nCreative prosumers have little concern for the drawbacks. I'm not sure why you think your use case matches a creative prosumer's. \n\nTVs have display technology long before PC monitors: PC monitors will always have the short end of the stick, so of course they can't be compared in timelines. It's like claiming \"Well, servers have had 8C/16T CPUs for decades. What's so special that prosumers have them now?\"\n\nThis PC monitor is not targeted for desktop usage, in any way, in any price bracket. It is meant for authoring / reviewing creative media. \n\nSimply because it is not a stop-gap for you does not mean it is not a stop-gap for PC monitors (which have more uses than simply \"I don't like blooming in my mouse cursor when I have a dark background\"). \n\nThere is a genuine market for mini-LED, even if it does not include you.", "989" ], [ "This monitor has absolutely zero focus on \"desktop applications\" or \"PC gaming\". Local dimming alone adds significant latency. \n\nThis is targeted for creative prosumers who author or review videos specifically (note the DCI-P3 gamut exceeds AdobeRGB). \n\nThere is not a single person on Earth who will accidentally buy this PC monitor and then think \"Damn, games don't look good. Local dimming sucks.\"\n\nYou've completely misunderstood the target market.", "989" ], [ "It's because the vast majority of PC monitors are targeted at businesses, many who prefer large on-screen elements versus pixel density. \n\nThe PC monitor long abandoned a PQ focus after the desktop marketed shrunk significantly in the 2010s. \n\nMost monitors sold in a store are purely targeted to casual home users or small businesses. \n\nMost retailers have extremely low interest in the tiny, tiny (less than 1%, judging by 2020 data) market for PQ-focused PC monitors. \n\nIt is not the 2010s any more and it's clear PC monitors are at the back of the display panel train.", "989" ], [ "Local dimming ***absolutely*** increases the contrast ratio across the monitor, though not in a single unit area. Likewise, local dimming was ***never*** meant for desktop applications. \n\nRTINGS on [**local dimming on PC monitors**](_URL_1_):\n\n > The lights behind the LCD layer adapt to the picture displayed, **improving the contrast ratio**. \n\nIt sure is an imperfect improvement across the entire panel, but that is simply not a problem for the target market for these PC monitors: video authoring and review. Not playing games. Not using traditional desktop applications. Any discussion of games or traditional applications is evidence of completely misunderstanding the target market. \n\nIt's not as if all high-end PC monitors are transitioning mini-LED. There is no universal stop-gap technology before emissive displays reach maturity: dual-layer has its own problems, VA has its own problems, IPS has its own problems, TN has many problems, etc. in each market.\n\nIt'll always be a compromise and downplaying transmissive-based improvements by stating \"Well, it's ***still*** not as good as an emissive display,\" is missing the forest for the trees. \n\nI've made zero comparisons here. A stop-gap literally means \"in between\", not equal.\n\nJudging by the decline of the desktop (aka it is no longer the 2010s), PC monitors will languish with transmissive displays for [a ***very*** long time](_URL_0_). No panel manufacturer will spend any serious investment in PQ/$ for any traditional PC monitor consumers who can't or won't spend $1000+ for a monitor.", "989" ], [ "How many mouse cursors do you believe are present in video authoring and editing processes? That has zero (literally **zero**) bearing for the intended use-case here.\n\nPeople literally cringe when seeing a cursor on top of a video, so I can assure you small-time content producers **absolutely** agree. That you've somehow convinced yourself this is an issue for video editing is more than a little preposterous.\n\n > Local backlights are not good for computers, and especially not good for production systems.\n\nThis is not targeted for film / TV production in any way. Surely the price gave that away. There's a reason Apple, LG, ASUS, Samsung, Acer, Dell, HP and others have [**introduced FALD / mini-LED displays**](_URL_0_)**:** it helps the overall video quality. Is it emissive quality? Of course not. Neither are any of the transmissive compromises, i.e., IPS, VA, etc.\n\nIt is simply yet *another* compromise to be added to the arsenal as PC monitors will remain transmissive displays for a ***very*** long time.", "989" ], [ "This discussion has completely devolved, so let's wrap up this troll-ish post now.\n\nThere are no magic solutions: every display technology has compromises. Your inability to admit that doesn't change the facts here. Local dimming has already arrived in PC monitors and will continue to be used because **it is better for some uses** than the current standards. That's it: there is no conspiracy here of trying to hoodwink users that this is an all-purpose, all-superior technology. \n\nBut, please, continue to the dig the hole here and we'll see more and more uptake of FALD / mini-LED over time.\n\nIt is not marketed for **literal** film / TV production, but typical content producers who want to create and review HDR content. Did you think reference monitors were priced at $5000? This strawman argument was weak in your first post and it's weak now.\n\nThat you still seem confused that FALD / mini-LED has a market is enough reddit for today.", "989" ], [ "PQ = Picture Quality\n\nRTINGS, Anandtech, Notebookcheck, and a few other review sites have extremely thorough picture quality measurements.\n\n[**RTINGS has an excellent overview of what constitutes picture quality**](_URL_1_), generally speaking: you can debate minutiae, but it's rather clear what matters and what does not.\n\n[**Screenshot here**](_URL_0_). Contrast ratio & local dimming (used purely to improve contrast ratio) take the cake at 13%.\n\nRTINGS' scoring system has thousands of data points: take your pick.", "17" ], [ "It's hardly a high number of zones; 2000 is still an ***extremely*** low quantity, especially on a 32\" display at 4K resolution. That it broke the previous record is the *only* news here.\n\nThe real issue with VA panels: *much* harder to hit 100% DCI-P3 targets and absolutely *much* worse off-axis performance (critical on a 32\" monitor that sits inches from your face). I'd love to see more VA panels, but there's zero momentum for high-end, prosumer displays. Add VA's black crush, text rendering foibles, and it's a poor choice overall for color-critical work. A lower contrast ratio can be aided by dimming the lights and reducing reflections; the **inability** to produce colors is permanent.\n\nRTINGS [**specifically dislikes VA panels as PC monitors**](_URL_0_) and it's clear why.", "989" ], [ "\"Weird brightness distortions\"\n\n= back in reality =\n\nUsed on dozens of high-end 2019 and 2020 LCD TVs and notable prosumer displays (e.g., Apple's Pro Display XDR) because it increases overall contrast ratios that most users appreciate in video content\n\n_URL_0_\n\nThis thread is legitimately fallacy after fallacy. Keep digging: I've set some RES tags already\n\nOf course FALD / mini-LED is a stop-gap. That we keep reading comment after comment that \"it's not good enough for me and that's important to share\" is genuinely astounding.", "989" ], [ "Fully agreed. It'll take, just like everything else has for a hundred years, sustained pressure. I fully suspect, if Dems re-take Congress + White House, the first discussions will purely be deficit reduction to begin <PERSON>'s spiel as a \"compromiser\" with Republicans. Like AOC's <PERSON> protest, the progressive movement has to make moves ASAP.\n\nUntil the election, there's no way any establishment Democratic leader, who more or less dominate the power structure today, will go on record to discuss the internal Democratic clashes. The WSJ wrote up a piece:\n\n[_URL_1_](_URL_1_)\n\nNon-paywall: [_URL_0_](_URL_0_)\n\nIt'll also depend on the Senate & House results: does the majority grow in the House, how close is the Senate or does it even flip, etc. The more progressives there are, the more conciliatory Dem leadership will need to be.\n\nI think back to 2008 when <PERSON> was elected and I think the progressive movement is at its strongest ever, though clearly not leading the agenda yet. The next \\~6 months will shape the next 6 years.", "953" ], [ "NUVIA's previous performance estimates are both [**wildly exciting**](_URL_1_) and still untested. While they've never shipped anything to anyone, they are apparently worth billions. It lends evidence that M1 wasn't ever \"magic\", but just damn good engineering that others *can* replicate if they dedicate the resources & time & money.\n\nThe new Qualcomm CEO, <PERSON>, is [particularly pumped](_URL_0_); IIRC, he helped guide this merger in his former position. The current monoculture of Arm's stock cores (Qualcomm, NVIDA, Samsung, Mediatek) is hopefully ending.\n\n > **The \"Arm roadmap does not allow us to lead in the CPU performance for the next-generation computing devices,\" <PERSON> said.** \"We needed to have a roadmap to lead in that transition.\" \n > \n > At the time of the acquisition offer in January, Nuvia didn't yet have working CPUs in production. <PERSON> declined to say when the first Nuvia cores could make their way to Qualcomm products but said **\"as soon as we close \\[the acquisition\\], you're going to hear from us.\"**\n\nFor once, we'll see *actual* competition to the M1. Genuinely, without sarcasm, cannot wait for the \"Not faster than NUVIA\" comment spam if Qualcomm can actually deliver this.", "85" ], [ "Qualcomm and [**its smartphone partners were raving about NUVIA**](_URL_0_), however. But Qualcomm sees laptops as the more serious potential. Many laptop OEMs, having tasted the successes of Chromebooks + noticed Apple's M1 heat / battery life - > better user experience, are probably much more interested than smartphone OEMs.\n\nFor smartphones, NUVIA will be somewhat hard to differentiate from Arm's stock cores & Apple's designs. The typical user experience of using an A14 vs an SD888 isn't *really* different.\n\nFor laptops, NUVIA will—if they can deliver—offer a ***far*** superior experience to Intel's and AMD's laptops. The typical user experience will be abundantly better on a high-performance Arm CPU: fanless, super-responsive, light, long battery life, zero throttling, etc.\n\nNormal people care about battery life, fans, weight, responsiveness and while laptops are much better today than even five years ago, high-perf Arm is a serious step-up from anything x86.", "127" ], [ "The numbers are *literally* in the article. Have you read the article? Do understand that AnandTech is discussing this problem for likely 1/3 of the entire article. The cores take up so little power, especially in 1T threads, while the IO die is guzzling watts.\n\n > despite the 180 W listed TDP, **a 4.1 GHz Zen 3 core should not need more than 10 W per core**, which leaves a lot of power for any configuration that wants to push the IO a little faster (more on that below).\n\nYes, power increases by the **square** of voltage; yet, because the IO die consumes so much power, the core itself plays a very small role in total TDP in 1T consumption. EPYC CPUs' cores actually consume very little power. Read the article, mate.\n\nYou're also not considering the suggestion is 4.5 GHz+, which will be even *less* than 10W power increase. Literally 10W at load. Nothing to do with idle.\n\nThis is 1T load. It is nowhere near 280W. I think you do not at all understand this discussion about the IO die & AMD's CCD total load power consumption under 1T load.\n\nSigh, why do I even comment here?", "121" ], [ "> My guess is they have cores/die so low in order to reduce cache contention and max out single-thread performance. \n\nWell, max out in so far as cache-bound scenarios, yes. \n\n > So it looks like they can disable a lot of cores on Epyc and still make a profit. \n\nNot that I disagree with the possibility, but *if* AMD can save money, I don't know why they'd spend more than needed (i.e., 7713 & 7763, the 64C variants, sell for $7000 to $8000). If AMD can make nearly 80% more revenue versus an F-series, I'd imagine they would. With the price increases, it seems like AMD understands the demand is there.\n\nThat's a good question, though ideally AMD would've allowed non-AVX frequency scaling for what I *want* to believe is a pittance in power.", "85" ], [ "Absolutely certainty with zero evidence nor data? Nobody should take *you* seriously.\n\nThe adapter was quickly removed in subsequent generations, but they kept on selling AirPods.\n\nAirPods literally launched within **three months** of the iPhone 7, the first iPhone without an earphone jack. I'm sorry, have you owned an iPhone? Do you not watch their presentations? What are you supposed to be doing here?\n\nMany Android OEMs *did* launch wireless earbuds close to their removal of the headphone jack: OnePlus, Samsung, Google Pixel, etc.\n\nAll right, I'm not wasting any more for someone who did not remember (or never knew?) the AirPods & iPhone 7 launched within three months of each other, <PERSON>. Please find someone else to troll or \"debate\".", "21" ], [ "For someone who thought the \"laws of physics\" were being violated, I'm not sure why I should waste any more time. Hope you can find someone else to debate, as we're clearly on different levels here.\n\nTotal TDP is the key metric to enterprise customers; it's why it's configurable.\n\nYou do not understand math in the slightest. 150W / 280W = 53% of total TDP.\n\nPower/density, what? 10W in a 140W part is not changing the density in any significant way. Tj nominal? Read what you're writing. TDP = thermal **design** power, i.e., the cooling solution is designed for the **maximum** power already.\n\nThe 150W ***is*** the total package. Again, in the article. 10W is **per-core** and in a 1T load (aka the peak frequency), the cap is ostensibly low. Chiplet binning occurs in EPYC, too: it's why these are 256MB cache parts on tiny 8C SKUs.\n\nPlease don't delete these messages; I gotta grab a screenshot.", "542" ], [ "I think you've lost the plot here. What you seem to be missing is NUVIA's pedigree and likely why Qualcomm was even interested.\n\n > <PERSON> is the CEO of NUVIA. **Prior to co-founding NUVIA, he was a Senior Director at Apple and Chief CPU Architect for nearly a decade with responsibilities for a range of leading-edge CPUs and SoCs across a broad array of devices.** Before joining Apple, <PERSON> spent over 10 years at ARM, as an ARM Fellow, and serving on the ARM Architectural Review and Technical Advisory Boards. While at ARM, he served as a technical advisor for the ARM architecture and CPU development to many key ARM partners.\n\n...\n\n > <PERSON> is the SVP of Silicon Engineering at NUVIA. Before joining Google, **<PERSON> spent eight years at Apple as the lead SoC architect responsible for numerous Apple leading-edge mobile SoCs** across a range of devices.\n\n...\n\n > <PERSON> is the SVP of System Engineering at NUVIA and has over 24 years of industry experience. Before joining Google, **<PERSON> spent five years at Apple in a similar role in the company’s platform architecture group where he founded Apple’s silicon competitive analysis team.**\n\n1. OEMs want some independence from Wintel, a slowing & increasingly stagnant platform on the scale of a decade. Laptops have been in a slow [**decline since 2010**](_URL_0_). AMD's laptop movement are [**just plain slow**](_URL_2_), notable as they launch desktop & enterprise *far* before their APUs.\n2. I think you missed the major story here and why AnandTech has been closely following NUVIA, while the rest of the hardware review scene has not. NUVIA [**claims their first CPU outperforms Apple's A13** ](_URL_5_), so it's likely why Qualcomm paid billions. Qualcomm has its own average CPU architects *already*.\n3. x86 perf-watt is [**nowhere close**](_URL_1_) to Apple's current perf-watt. It'll be years before it's even close. \"Improving\" is AMD & Intel's typical pace of a new uarch every 18 to 24 months.\n4. Do we understand that Qualcomm will be **using** NUVIA's cores and not Arm stock cores and not Qualcomm's prior custom cores? That's the point here; Qualcomm used ancient, terrible cores for a very long time in their pathetic \"7cx\" and \"8cx\" line-up. The Microsoft Surface Pro is evidence enough that nobody gave a shit.\n5. Gaming laptops are a minority; business + personal are [**the overwhelming majority**](_URL_4_) and account for nearly all laptop revenue. Anybody who thinks Qualcomm or Apple spent billions on laptop R & D for *gamers* are vastly confused.\n6. Microsoft has been painfully and slowly developing Windows on Arm since 2015. That's exactly why Microsoft is so giddy in the Qualcomm press release: they know they've fucked up the transition (partly in-hand with Qualcomm) relative to Apple, so they need hardware help for x86 emulation + encouraging developers to build WoA applications.\n\n > ARM isn't required to replicate M1. A highly efficient silicon design with optimized OS and software is. There is no magic in vanilla ARM cores that makes them somewhat superior than x86 cores.\n\nWhat do you think M1 is, if not a \"highly efficient silicon design\"? The OS & software are out of Qualcomm's control, and yet they still partner with Microsoft.\n\nArm *alone* is not enough, but it has **many** specific enhancements that, when used properly, can offer significantly superior performance (and especially perf-watt) when compared to x86: see the *many* articles on this topic. Variable-length instructions, ability to scale to 8-wide decode, etc. A [**great video**](_URL_3_) that has helped people delve into why Arm *can* allow for higher performance.", "85" ], [ "If they had the resources, Qualcomm seemingly did not feel eager to use them. Even at its peak, the datacenter division [had just 1,000](_URL_2_) out oft Qualcomm's 33,000 employees. :(\n\nThough, NUVIA as [a startup](_URL_0_) is perhaps underselling them a bit: I might say NUVIA is more a brain trust aiming to partner / join a larger firm. That is, a startup in the CPU architecture - > core design business would likely either need licensing deals and/or a merger to ship silicon in volume on TSMC's / Samsung's nicer codes (7nm & smaller), which I assume datacenters would've preferred.\n\nArm's stock Neoverse cores could always use more competition in the datacenter, though, so I hope Centriq gets a successor (as Qualcomm's PR on the merger, perhaps expectedly, [doesn't mention](_URL_1_) future DC / enterprise plans).", "85" ], [ "This article neatly and almost totally refutes Qualcomm's prior positioning. This is the shift and it's been long planned by Qualcomm's CEO, <PERSON> (see bottom of this comment).\n\nNUVIA has already designed the cores. There's ***no way*** Qualcomm is shipping a NUVIA-based laptop SoC in late 2022 unless they ship the high-performance, claimed-A13-beating cores NUVIA *already* designed.\n\nSee Anandtech's straightforward analysis,\n\n > Sampling in late 2022 would require a tape-out in early 2022, and a design-in essentially as soon as possible following the acquisition today. **The whole process seems extremely fast and aggressive in terms of timing**, pointing out that Qualcomm is putting a lot of emphasis on the project.\n\nAs Qualcomm admitted, NUVIA's cores are targeting laptops: *much* higher average selling price ($$$ is no problem) and oodles of excess power (die space / total power budget is no problem) versus the PPA restrictions common in smartphones.\n\nQualcomm says it outright,\n\n > *“The first Qualcomm Snapdragon platforms to feature Qualcomm’s new internally designed CPUs are expected to sample in the second half of 2022 and will be designed for* **high performance** *ultraportable laptops.* *“*\n\nQualcomm already spent $1.4 *billion* ([6% of their 2020 revenue](_URL_0_)) on buying NUVIA, so AnandTech seems correct that they are putting a significant emphasis on NUVIA's own cores.\n\nMake no mistake: Qualcomm is now fighting Intel, AMD, and Apple much more directly. This has long been an ambition by their now-CEO, who explained it quite bluntly to [AnandTech 14 months ago](_URL_1_),\n\n > <PERSON>: **If you think about problems to solve, Microsoft today has three suppliers: Intel, AMD, and Qualcomm.** The PC space is well defined, but you can actually create the same or better experience with a fully rounded SoC that offers better battery life and connectivity! I find it interesting that when people say ‘Windows on Arm’, the Arm specific part is actually just a small piece of what we have to do. We prefer to say ‘Windows on Snapdragon’, because this is really what it is with our partnership with Microsoft. \n > \n > Now in the future, if Apple moves their SoC architecture to the Mac Book, Microsoft is going to want to have access to the **best possible devices that can compete** in the future of connectivity. In that is support for enterprise services, like Azure. So naturally we expect Microsoft to **pick the best Arm SoC vendor**, and focus their R & D efforts into supporting that solution. That’s my vantage point, and **I don’t expect Microsoft is going to want to go after a low-end Arm notebook or tablet market in the same way.**\n\nNow, there could be *many* more problems here and many questions remain on whether NUVIA can deliver. But I don't expect Qualcomm is, for lack of a better phrase, fucking around with NUVIA's cores too much.", "85" ], [ "Notably, AnandTech just updated the article after speaking with Qualcomm and it seems to be one option going forward, but not their priority.\n\n > We asked the team if Qualcomm would continue to invest into NUVIA’s original plans to enter the server and enterprise market, with a response that this wasn’t the main goal or motivation of the acquisition, that Qualcomm however would very much keep that as an open option for the future, and **let the NUVIA team explore those possibilities.** <PERSON> here acknowledged that it’s tough market to crack, and that Qualcomm had made no definitive decisions yet in terms of long-term planning.\n\nThis also bodes well for NUVIA's autonomy as a \"unit\" inside Qualcomm, which gives me more hope (NUVIA's current prototypes give me more hope than whoever at Qualcomm was designing the custom Kyro cores).", "85" ], [ "[**ALBUM of 942 respondents**](_URL_0_)\n\n1. Disclaimers\n2. 8GB vs 16GB\n3. Chrome vs no Chrome\n4. Chrome vs Safari video buffering\n\nNotably not mentioned in the video, Microsoft Edge has, on Windows, [disable video buffer writes to disk in order to improve battery life](_URL_1_). Not sure on the relevancy to MacOS versions, however:\n\n > Today, streaming media content is cached to disk during acquisition and playback. Keeping the disk active during this process increases power consumption in general, and can also prevent certain lower-power modes from being engaged in the operating system. Since media consumption is a high-usage scenario, this extra power usage has a negative impact on battery life. This proposal will prevent the caching of certain media content to disk for the purpose of improving device battery life for users.\n\nMicrosoft only reported saving 309KB/sec, which makes me think the other browsers have *really* screwed something up.", "448" ], [ "> Qualcomm would be better off launching Nuvia’s core in server markets first. \n\nIllogical, right? Why would they? It doesn't make sense: Qualcomm brings the most industry, experience, and a long chain of partners *in the consumer space*.\n\nQualcomm would be shooting themselves in the foot if they, a predominantly consumer organization, shifted to B2B for this acquisition. Looks like Qualcomm already confirmed they won't enter the fierce enterprise market anytime soon:\n\n > We asked the team if Qualcomm would continue to invest into NUVIA’s original plans to enter the server and enterprise market, with a response that this wasn’t the main goal or motivation of the acquisition, that Qualcomm however would very much keep that as an open option for the future, and let the NUVIA team explore those possibilities. **<PERSON> here acknowledged that it’s tough market to crack, and that Qualcomm had made no definitive decisions yet in terms of long-term planning.**\n\nOn emulation, you're thinking of the situation *today*. \n\nNUVIA's SoC won't launch until late 2022, by Qualcomm's own rosy targets. [**Microsoft is already ecstatic about the acquisition**](_URL_0_), as they have their own Surface devices and Windows 10X seems *built* for an Arm port. Hell, Rosetta's launch even convinced Adobe to finally launch CC suite apps on Windows on Arm.\n\n > Microsoft: “It’s exciting to see NUVIA join the Qualcomm team. Our partnership with Qualcomm has always been about providing great experiences on our products. **Moving forward, we have an incredible opportunity to empower our customers across the Windows ecosystem**,” said <PERSON>, Chief Product Officer, Microsoft. \n\nIn the end, Microsoft wants the same thing as Apple: everyone develops native apps. Does this solve it? Nope, not even close. But it is, as AnandTech put it, a \"CPU Magnitude Shift\".", "85" ], [ "A great point. Hell, I should write M1 isn't confirmed as NUVIA only claims \"better than A13\", so would it reach an A14's Firestorm cores? We should, I think, expect the NUVIA Phoenix vs Apple M3, if we're looking at late 2022.\n\nI think whether it can *beat* the M3 is almost assuredly no, **but** its main competitors are more likely AMD & Intel, where beating the A13 is [**already a big accomplishment**](_URL_0_), i.e., 1/3 the watts to match an i9-9900K / i7-1185G7.\n\nBut, I think it validates the approach *overall*, so hopefully by 2025, we'll have more serious & interesting competition. Which is both exciting and a very long way away.", "85" ], [ "To be fair, would NUVIA—on its own—ever *really* been able to ship datacenter silicon in volume in the next five years + make enough money to continue? That is, I'd always thought their best options were to be acquired and/or partnering with an established player who wanted to use their architecture.\n\nEnterprise is a very fierce market that even established, full-to-the-brim-with-talent players have entered and left (Marvell, Qualcomm, AMD for a long time, NVIDIA, etc). The only survivors are 1) Intel, 2) AMD, and 3) Arm stock cores derivatives (Ampere, Amazon). Fujitsu is a unique exception with the [**A64FX**](_URL_0_).\n\nI imagine this acquisition helps build the foundation for NUVIA to one day launch datacenter silicon and that even through licensing (which would save NUVIA a lot of trouble), it would've been tough for NUVIA to make it on its own without a big backer.\n\nThis sort of steps the \"find a backer & keep them\" stage into \"OK, we'll just join you\"", "816" ], [ "***Exactly***. Now you get it. Why the hell would anyone have cared about the 8cx platform? Zero reasons. Qualcomm [**didn't give a single shit**](_URL_1_):\n\n > The current Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 laptop SoC was only announced three months before Snapdragon 888, but the combination of an **ARM Cortex A76 CPU** and a 7nm manufacturing process makes it equivalent to the [Snapdragon 855](_URL_0_), a smartphone SoC released in 2019. \n\nIs anyone excited for A76 cores in 2021? Doubt it. That's likely why there is so much aggressiveness in immediately replacing Qualcomm's terrible laptop SoCs with something far more performant. For all these OEMs, NUVIA cores will be a pretty sizeable upgrade in the next 24 months. And they look *very* willing to pay. \n\nTo not ignore the elephant in the room: these OEMs aren't enamored with [slow-growing, often-declining x86 sales](_URL_2_). Intel's & Microsoft's evergreen flops have hurt their total PC revenue significantly.\n\nAMD & Intel have nothing especially exciting in this segment (high perf-watt, top-tier total performance) and their $/KPI has been stagnant for a long time. Do most business / consumer users want eight performance cores? Do most business / consumer users want a 28W CPU? AMD is beating Intel at Intel's game, but NUVIA & Apple are chasing a long-term goal: an ISA shift to allow for much higher perf-watt.", "85" ], [ "> I actually find CarPlay nice but honestly a navigation that includes charging on route much more important as long as there is Bluetooth.\n\nApple Maps just [**shipped EV routing**](_URL_0_), including charge state & elevation.\n\n > The EV routing aims to eliminate range anxiety — the fear of running out of charge — by showing charging stations compatible to a user’s electric vehicle along their route. Maps on iOS 14 will track the user’s current charge and factor in things like elevation and whether to automatically add charging stops along their route, Apple senior director <PERSON> said Monday during WWDC 2020.\n\nQuite disappointed Rivian failed to integrate Apple CarPlay & Android Auto. Licensing should not be an issue = Rivian likely has dozens of third-party licenses already.\n\n* Alexa will require a license. Rivian shares its tech integrations with Amazon.\n* Rivian will license the map data: Rivian isn't doing its own maps.\n* Rivian will license their OS kernel / firmware: Rivian isn't writing an operating system from scratch.\n\nMost days will never require EV routing, hell, but Apple Maps has it, so there's little concern. But Bluetooth is, to me, plain regressive: buying a third-party mount, keeping a phone charged, crappy integrating navigation with in-car audio, using a tiny 6\" screen, two split notification systems, etc.\n\nIf it's just Bluetooth, hell, a 2010 $30k will get you the same. Tesla made this same fuck-up and it's a notable pain point.", "697" ], [ "Same. It's not that \"Rivian can't write a good UI\", it's the **convenience** of **seamless integration**.\n\n* All the same apps & the same logins & all the same saved data.\n* Seamless integration with calls, messages, etc.\n* Much stronger security & restrictions at Apple than at Rivian.\n\nRivian can be too clever for their own good, it seems. People thought the built-in flashlight was cute, not a model for the software: \"Rivian will give you a small shitty version of what normal people will use and you'll be happy we even included it--see, it's for free with the car! You can't beat free. And it's from us. We made it. Aren't you happy you have it?\"", "697" ], [ "The 5800H *also* won't be sold to anyone directly, just like the Apple M1, and so it won't be judged on its own merits: it, for better and worse, fully depends on the laptops it gets used in. Great laptop design will let the 5800H muscle its way & not push extremes of power / heat; poor laptop design makes it by integration & association a \"worse CPU\".\n\nThe same applies to Intel: laptops & mobile phones should target integration, platform optimization, *end-user quality*, etc.\n\nFor example, Apple could have significantly reduced the battery size of the M1 devices and kept similar-to-Intel battery life. \"Thin and light!\" But, by focusing a bit more on end-user quality, they got *stellar* battery life, nearly breaking 1000 minutes on Notebookcheck's battery test (a symbolic record).\n\nThe best comparison will be M1 Apple MacBooks vs 5800H laptops: battery life, sustained performance, heat management / throttling, operating system usability & performance, software compatibility, etc.\n\nThat's what \"real\" people actually buy laptops on: what does a ***shipping*** product behave like?\n\n//\n\nApple's laptops **absolutely** compete with Windows x86 laptops. It's not insanely one-sided as some may believe (i.e., 90% of the desktop/laptops uses Windows!). [**In 2017**](_URL_0_), MacOS had \\~100 million users while Windows 10 had \\~400 million. 100 million users aren't inconsequential or \"not any real competition\". The numbers seem similar in Nov 2020: MacOS accounts for [**17% of all desktops/laptops globally**](_URL_1_).\n\nIt's a primary goal of M1: create another key differentiator against the vibrant ecosystem of Windows laptops (vibrant in design & features; decidedly monopolized by x86).\n\nAnd Windows vs MacOS is not a stagnant battle: \"it's like 95% vs 5%, you fools\". Apple has ***significantly*** increased desktop/laptop marketshare over the past 10 years. I'm too tired to type out the other OS' % (it's predominantly Windows), but the data is pretty clear:\n\nMacOS growth on desktops & laptops between 2009 to 2020: **450%.**\n\n|**Year**|MacOS Market Share|\n|:-|:-|\n|2009|4.72%|\n|2010|6.25%|\n|2011|7.01%|\n|2012|7.69%|\n|2013|7.83%|\n|2013|8.67%|\n|2015|9.8%|\n|2016|11.00%|\n|2017|13.06%|\n|2018|12.33%|\n|2019|16.46%|\n|2020 (last 12 months)|16.54%|", "689" ], [ "It's not the navigation quality I (would) disagree with: anybody should be able to make maps and route reasonably well. It's the integration and ease-of-use with my life *outside* the car. I'm sure Rivian can make an app with Spotify's API, but how many years will it take them to replicate a single streaming app? And bug fixes? Or feature parity? Or does Spotify need to write their app and how much priority will / should Spotify give to a few thousand owners?\n\nI live in a *decidedly* non-metro area (less than 120 people / sq. mi) and Apple Maps is stellar, but YMMV. Even Google seemingly offers [**EV routing**](_URL_0_), so there are seemingly options here.\n\nI haven't used Android Auto, but Apple CarPlay does not go full screen on plenty of cars: in fact, most of the complaints I hear about CarPlay are about people *wanting* it to [**go full-screen**](_URL_1_).\n\nWe might disagree on the meaning of sophisticated here: if Rivian can actually deliver *polished* sophistication instead of \"wait six years and you'll get maybe four random apps that are rarely updated\", then I'm not seeing any problems.\n\nHaving a platform w/o apps isn't necessarily sophistication, but just Windows 8: confusingly \"new\" and designed by people who don't understand people *prefer* the software they already use.\n\nBut, fair: I do agree it's a choice, but if Rivian wants to become an operating system developer, I hope they're ready to commit commensurate energy as the details are still rather light, \\~9 months out.", "697" ], [ "> Assuming we see the same performance uplift from Zen 3 as we saw on the desktop chips, M1 will match or slightly beat Cezanne in single-threaded workloads, will handily beat Cezanne in GPU performance and performance per watt, but Cezanne will outperform M1 significantly in highly parallel workloads. A Cezanne-equipped machine can also **significantly outperform M1 on GPU workloads when paired with a mobile GeForce GPU** (which is currently not an option for M1), it can be equipped with more **than 16 GB of RAM**, and there is **more flexibility with** respect to using external displays.\n\nWhy compare the ***highest***\\-end AMD laptops with the ***lowest***\\-end Apple laptops? The pricing isn't close for the quality. Even in the best of times, a [**$1000 Ryzen-H + NVIDIA GPU**](_URL_0_) will have a far faster throttling, far worse screen, far worse heat output, far worse build quality, heavier, thicker, louder, etc. It will have significantly more ports and larger screens...and those are seemingly the only hardware wins.\n\nM1 laptops are the lowest-end, lowest-TDP laptops.\n\nI doubt a dGPU + 32GB + dual/triple-display Apple laptop will use the M1 chip; it's their cheapest SoC. By the time the 5800H is *actually* available to buy, I wouldn't be surprised to see an M1X-variant already in a MacBook Pro.\n\n//\n\nLikewise, I do not think Cezanne's nT performance will \"significantly outperform\" the M1**X** variants. You know, it's *actual* competitor releasing at a similar time. nT is at best 1T x # of cores. I'd take 8C Firestorm + 4C Icestorm over 8C Zen3 any day of the week, much less even close to 8C TGL.", "153" ], [ "M1 vs Zen3 has [**already been settled**](_URL_4_), no? It's not *just* Geekbench. It's everywhere, in general compute.\n\nI think the fairest criticism is how much longer for native M1 support of your applications. I do not think any mobile dGPU is going to beat out a high-end M1X variant, though we'll see: the M1's GPU already [notches just behind a GTX 1650](_URL_5_).\n\n||M1|Zen3 @ 5.05 GHz|M1 / Zen3 @ 5.05 GHz|\n|:-|:-|:-|:-|\n|SPEC2006fp|104.10|94.08|**111%**|\n|SPEC2006int|69.40|68.53|**101%**|\n|SPEC2017fp|10.37|9.79|**106%**|\n|SPEC2017int|6.66|7.29|91%|\n\nM1 **beats** Zen3 @ 5.05GHz in three of the four tests. But, the issue becomes Zen3's clock speed. Will AMD be willing to pump 20.6W ([power per-core for 5.05GHz on Zen3](_URL_3_)) for a single-core on mobile?\n\nAMD notably **reduces** the clock speeds of its APUs versus its desktop counterparts (even as they only eat up [**\\~12W**](_URL_1_) on single-threaded tests).\n\nZen2 Desktop: [up to **4.7** GHz](_URL_0_) (Ryzen 9 3950X)\n\nZen2 APUs: [up to **4.4** GHz](_URL_2_) (Ryzen 9 4900H)\n\nSame architecture, same \"Ryzen 9\" highest tier, and also no chiplets: but still AMD was forced to lop off 300 MHz.\n\nIt looks the same here; this 5800H is only boosting to 4.5 GHz. The Zen3 scores above are from 5.05 GHz. M1 will beat Cezanne in 1T *for sure* unless AMD significantly increases the power consumption & heat output of Zen3 APUs.\n\nThough, as noted, Cezanne will release closer to M1X than M1; M1X is its closest competitor.", "153" ], [ "A veritable **sea** of misinformation, which is not atypical for /r/hardware these days, especially when debating Zen3 or Tiger Lake proponents.\n\n* uarches ***do*** need to push the total performance to be competitive. Graviton2 is a *perfect* example.\n* Graviton2 ***is*** [**significantly faster**](_URL_0_) than the newest Xeon CPUs in most nT benchmarks. Arm cores can pack *many* more cores. More cores ***improve*** total performance: is that controversial now, too? In the server space, nT is far more important. I [**genuinely have zero idea**](_URL_1_) what gave you the idea that the 64C Graviton2 is *slower* by a significant margin for its workloads. **Graviton2 beats Xeon** and obliterates Naples--Rome is likely where it'll lose.\n* The OP's 1,000-word treatise uses Cinebench **exclusively**. I don't focus on Cinebench, either: I'm refuting the OP's claims on their foundation.\n\n > The people actually rendering stuff care\n\nLet's not move the goalposts. The OP is debating **general CPU performance**. \n\n > Yes, which is why single thread performance matters minimally in most tasks where power efficiency matters. \n\nIs this a troll post? Mobile devices + laptops are absolutely heavily web-based, where single-threaded **and** power efficiency are two primary goals. Are you reading what you write?\n\n > \"It's possible to decrease power consumption by **several times** with fairly small performance impact\". \n\nAgain, is this a troll post? Is there a gag here? You *just* claimed benchmarking with Cinebench was \"hilariously dumb\", and yet you now claim the perf/watt numbers **using Cinebench** have proven your claim that Zen3's perf-per-watt is much higher.\n\nYou need to be internally consistent in your arguments at the very least.", "85" ], [ "Their source is [**AMD**](_URL_1_).\n\nUndervolting and overclocking are two sides of the same coin: exploit silicon variance at the expense of stability and [**security**](_URL_0_). The OP's own testing includes stability checks because they, too, realize undervolting lowers CPU stability.\n\nAMD can't sell \"95% stable\" CPUs to win benchmarks and/or internet arguments. Neither can Intel nor Apple nor NVIDIA nor Qualcomm: any factory undervolting by resellers is playing with the same dice, just like factory overclocking from EVGA or Sapphire.\n\nThe silicon is the limit. No amount of software can fix a hardware limit for stock configurations. Of course, tweaking is always aimed at getting the *absolute* best out of silicon, so I genuinely applaud AMD for releasing PBO2 & its undervolting system.\n\nBut it does make sense why it can't be warrantied.", "85" ], [ "Should anyone waste any time responding? Good luck: I hope troll posts can go back out of vogue here on /r/hardware. Muted for the future. The replies below are for posterity and for the pained lurkers who've made it this far.\n\n > Neoverse N1 is **significantly slower** than Zen2\n\nThe pretzel you've put yourself in: we were talking about 1T performance and you, out of nowhere, brought up a server CPU whose entire design was targeted for extremely high core counts.\n\nGraviton2 succeeded in its goal: nT performance. Single-threaded performance is what the OP is discussing; you changed topics to something you felt more comfortable in, i.e., arguing about nT server performance in a thread about 1T client performance.\n\nA servers' total CPU performance is heavily reliant on **nT** performance. The axiom is still true: server uarches **need** to push total performance.\n\nA client's total CPU performance is heavily reliant on **1T** performance. The axiom is still true: client uarches **need** to push total performance.\n\n > **You** are the one putting an emphasis on single threaded performance\n\nNope. The OP focused precisely on single-threaded performance. That's what we're talking about it. ***You*** out of nowhere brought up server CPUs to find a quick out from an argument you've lost.\n\n > You are **fundamentally misunderstanding** OP's argument, which is the idea that measuring power efficiency from a single thread benchmark where one CPU is effectively overclocked to hell, is idiotic, and isn't useful information for thinking about the efficiency.\n\n<PERSON>: *nobody is overclocking anything*. Get the fuck outta here, <PERSON>: what overclocking do you see? \"Effective overclocking?\" Holy shit: \"See, I'm just going to *call* it overclocking because that proves my point and I can twist AMD's specifications to win an internet argument that I've sorely lost, but have no out.\"\n\nLet me try: \"Hey, the M1 is effectively overclocked, so it actually has a much higher perf-per-watt. Zen3 can suck it.\"\n\nSee how stupid this becomes? AMD chose the TDP & AMD chose the clocks: this is true for 65W parts, 15W parts, 35W parts, etc. If AMD wanted to save power, then it should've done so: Apple's M1 resolutely stays very far away from the horrendously flat perf/watt curve at the end.\n\nAMD couldn't or didn't want to, so they'll pay the price with Zen3.\n\n > As rendering is a task that scales **very well** with more cores, analyzing single core efficiency with Cinebench is worthwhile\n\nThe lengths people go to defend a CPU that's good, but simply and clearly not even in the same league as M1.\n\nI'll let you re-read this ***exact quote*** a few times again and realize how asinine your argument is. 1T efficiency should be measured on only 1T-heavy workloads to minimize extraneous off-core power draws. Surely a proponent arguing for Zen3....would see that?\n\nAnandTech's benchmarks, and Andrei's tweets, are fully-formed arguments. Please, nobody else should waste their time. You'll get stupider trying to reconcile half of /r/hardware's commenters & their supremely inconsistent, irrational, and double-standard arguments.", "85" ], [ "> It is a pity that x86 was stagnant for so long that ARM not only catched up but beat it handily.\n\nTo be fair, x86 was [**heavily litigated**](_URL_0_) to be \"stagnant\": Intel is one of the world's most litigious companies, threatening suits up and down the x86 stack. Intel CPUs were everywhere in 2009, but Intel refused to believe it had any \"anti-trust issues\".\n\nNobody besides Intel & AMD can design & sell an x86 CPU across the world. Nobody. It's completely closed by design, intention, and litigation: Intel, I'm sure, still to this day utterly regrets ever being forced to open up x86 cross-licensing to AMD.\n\nThe pity is on customers; this comeuppance is purely Intel's choice.", "85" ], [ "> When Apple releases more models,\n\nlmao, this is a rumor thread about an AMD CPU that hasn't been announced in laptops that don't exist. Even *if* AMD announced it today, how many months until a single Zen3 APU laptop ships?\n\nA joke of an argument: 8C / 12C Firestorm hasn't been released, either, but [**all**](_URL_0_) [**indications**](_URL_2_) point to a 2021 release. When do Zen3 APUs expected to release? 2021. When is \"M1X\" (aka 8C/12C Firestorm cores) expected to release? 2021. This isn't complicated nor controversial. \n\nIf you want to talk about what's shipping today, the [**M1 spanks Zen2 Ryzen 4000 15W APUs**](_URL_1_) in **both** 1T and nT performance, even with half the performance cores. Moving to 35W, the 4900HS takes notches AMD's only win in SPECfp2017, while M1 obliterates AMD's best 35W CPU in SPECint2017.", "85" ], [ "Y’all haven’t read the article. Its single-core perf is just short of Zen3 while consuming ~~10x~~ 3x to 5x less power. \n\n_URL_0_\n\nPerf/watt is ~~9x~~ 3x to 5x higher than Zen3 in single-core. Intel is a joke at these performance levels. \n\nThis is not a debate. It’s literally in the article:\n\n“ In the overall SPEC2006 chart, the A14 is performing absolutely fantastic, taking the lead in absolute performance only falling short of AMD’s recent Ryzen 5000 series.\n\nThe fact that Apple is able to achieve this in a total device power consumption of 5W including the SoC, DRAM, and regulators, versus +21W (1185G7) and 49W (5950X) package power figures, without DRAM or regulation, is absolutely mind-blowing.”", "85" ], [ "Incorrect. Fastest CPU core. Full-stop. At similar form factor, it’s dominating. Read the article. \n\n“In the overall SPEC2006 chart, the A14 is performing absolutely fantastic, taking the lead in absolute performance only falling short of AMD’s recent Ryzen 5000 series.\n\nThe fact that Apple is able to achieve this in a total device power consumption of 5W including the SoC, DRAM, and regulators, versus +21W (1185G7) and 49W (5950X) package power figures, without DRAM or regulation, is absolutely mind-blowing.”", "85" ], [ "Absolutely no way ~~9x~~ 3x to 5x improvement in perf/watt comes from 7nm vs 5nm. Let’s be reasonable. x86 will nearly never be as power efficient as Arm: this is plain and clear. We’re missing the forest for the trees. \n\n5W (+ RAM) versus 49W package power for the 5950X (+ IF). \n\nHanging onto core counts isn’t optimistic at all for x86.\n\nApple can scale cores much faster than x86 can scale a ~~9x~~ 3x to 5x perf/watt deficit. \n\nZen3 is great, but this is a step-function and node shrinks aren’t going to help x86 enough—they’ll help Arm just as much, fwiw.", "85" ], [ "Y’all have not actually read the article. Keep going. I didn’t quote the whole 5 pages.\n\n“Apple claims the M1 to be the fastest CPU in the world. Given our data on the A14, beating all of Intel’s designs, and just falling short of AMD’s newest Zen3 chips – a higher clocked Firestorm above 3GHz, the 50% larger L2 cache, and an unleashed TDP, we can certainly believe Apple and the M1 to be able to achieve that claim.”\n\nIt doesn’t take a genius to realize that 10W chip will be faster than a 5W chip, from the same uarch. People can argue about minutiae, but it’s ridiculous to believe Zen3 or Tiger Lake are anything close. \n\nThis entire thread has missed the forest for the trees. It’s genuinely a massive shift: near ~~9x~~ 3x to 5x improvement in perf/watt over the next closest competitor. That’s a little exaggerated due to IF/uncore, but it’s not far off.", "85" ], [ "M1 ***is projected to be the single-core outright performance leader***. Fuck perf/watt: M1 could be 100 W and it'll still be the lead. I'm sure many people would be clapping, \"Ah, yes. TDP and performance uplifts that I'm comfortable with. Great work, Apple.\"\n\nThis is not difficult.\n\n“Apple claims the M1 to be **the fastest CPU in the world.** Given our data on the A14, beating all of Intel’s designs, and just falling short of AMD’s newest Zen3 chips – a higher clocked Firestorm above 3GHz, the 50% larger L2 cache, and an unleashed TDP, we can certainly believe Apple and the M1 to be able to achieve that claim.”\n\nIs it fastest CPU in perf/watt? Does that say the fastest mobile CPU? Does that say the fastest passively-cooled CPU? Nope, nope, nope. It is **the fastest CPU core in the world**—*fuck* perf/watt.\n\nEnough trolling. Please find someone else to debate. Zero patience for people who 1) can't interpret a benchmark and/or 2) vehemently disagree with the article's conclusion with zero competing evidence.", "85" ], [ "> 5w is for the A14. M1 is stated by Apple to be a 10 to 20 watt SoC. No doubt it would draw 20w under active cooling (like in the Macbook).\n\nNo. 5W is for A14 **+** DRAM **+** VRM **+ the rest of the SoC** (GPU, neural engine, etc.). The Firestorm CPU dies are using *less* than 5W.\n\n > The fact that Apple is able to achieve this in a total device power consumption of 5W including the SoC, DRAM, and regulators, versus +21W (1185G7) and 49W (5950X) package power figures, without DRAM or regulation, is absolutely mind-blowing.\n\n10W **passive** for the M1. It'll obliterate Zen3 APU's in both total perf and perf/watt. Once you move to 20W **active** M1 systems, we're in another class of performance.\n\n > As for the 5950x, most of the power is consumed by the communication between dies, since it's a chiplet-based SoC. But the mobile version won't be like that. It will be monolithic (all the components in the same die) so it will consume a lot less power. If you don't believe me just compare power consumption between Ryzen 3000 for desktop and Ryzen 4000 for laptops. They're based on the same architecture, but Ryzen 4000 consumes a lot less power thanks the monolithic design and advanced transistor gating.\n\nAnandtech **already measured** [**per-core power**](_URL_0_) for Zen3. This is not a mystery. At 1C **without** chiplet-to-chiplet, without PCIe, without IF, etc., Zen3 eats over 15W *easily*.\n\nZen3 1C (*intra-chiplet, intra-die, intra-CCD)* = **16W to 20W**\n\nApple A14/M1 Firestorm 1C = ** < 5W**\n\nOnce you remove the A14's DRAM, VRMs, etc., the *per-core* advantage of Firestorm is ***at least*** 3X and likely much more.\n\n > a lot less power thanks the monolithic design and advanced transistor gating.\n\nThe same \"advanced transistor gating\" is available to Arm—we do see that, right? Arm and x86 CPUs are fabbed at the same foundries.\n\nZen2 APU efficiencies come from **low idle**. At **load**, [**Zen2 APUs consume** ***well*** **over 30W**](_URL_1_).\n\n > Hardware Unboxed: That said, both modes we're testing still have strong boost behavior in keeping with how most Ryzen laptops we've tested actually operate. **This means a boost level up to 35 watts or so per round, five minutes at 25 watts, and 2.5 minutes at 15 watts.** This is a much longer boost period than Intel's U-series processors. But this is by design: AMD intends to push boost for as long as feasible to deliver maximum performance.", "121" ], [ "> As for efficiency, the M1 is a 10 to 20 watt SoC. It's good, but it's not impossible for an x86 SoC in 5nm. For instance, a Ryzen 4800u is a 15 to 28 watt in 7nm.\n\nYou realize Anandtech's *tests* are of the **5W A14 SoC** (CPU + DRAM + VRM + GPU + Neural Engine), not of the M1. We haven't seen M10 at *any* wattage.\n\nIt is **impossible** for an x86c SoC to consume 5W and offer competitive performance to A14/M1 SoCs. Not even close. 5nm won't help.\n\nThe 4800U consumes [over **30W** to sustain its peak performance](_URL_0_). The A14 ***obliterates*** the 4800U at 5W.\n\nThese are both mobile-optimized SoCs and the A14 is already burdened by DRAM + VRM power draws.", "121" ], [ "Let me follow up here on what has gone wrong in this entire thread.\n\n1. \"Apple said it's the low-power leader!\"\n2. OK, so let's wait for benchmarks.\n3. \"Exactly! Never listen to marketing spiel.\"\n4. Here, Anandtech tested the 5W A14 SoC. The M1 uses the same Firestorm CPU cores, but at 10W passive and 10W+ active. The 5W A14 SoC is **nearly** as fast as the fastest CPU tested, [**which uses 18W+ per-core**](_URL_2_).\n5. \"Well, the M1 might still be slower! Did you read Apple's marketing? Read the marketing! Apple only said M1 is only the low power leader. You need benchmarks!\"\n6. Anandtech **literally** ran an independent benchmark suite. You wanted benchmarks? These are **independent** benchmarks.\n7. \"But Apple's marketing. Why aren't we talking about the marketing?\"\n8. Read. The. Benchmarks.\n\nWhat people have forgotten: **the A14's Firestorm cores have been available for** ***weeks*** **of thorough testing. For weeks. The M1 uses Firestorm. That's why we can talk about M1's projected performance because they use an identical uarch (though increased cache, increased TDP, etc. which will all BOOST it past A14**).\n\nThis is not a cult? These are literal benchmarks. NUVIA has [**similar internal data**](_URL_1_) for their uarch. Geekbench shows similar results. SPEC2006fp & int follow the same trend.\n\nWhat other data do you want to see *today* in terms of M1's projected performance? Of course we all need to wait for the **hardware to ship**, but please read the **title** of the article,\n\n[Apple Announces The Apple Silicon M1: Ditching x86 - **What to Expect, Based on A14**](_URL_0_)\n\nI say this because of my next post...that, even as I'm not interested in debating here, you realize Anandtech's writers are **on** reddit, right?", "85" ], [ "<PERSON>, take a step back. Apple's marketing is meaningless here. Why does marketing change a benchmark score? How can marketing change a benchmark score? \n\nIgnore everything Apple has said and **look at the benchmarks**.\n\nAt a single core, Firestorm is the **dominating** uarch in performance. A14 uses Firestorm. M1 uses Firestorm. A14's SoC uses 5W. M1's SoC is expected to use 10W w/ passive cooling. It is clear and apparent that some of the additional 5W are to increase the power budget for **Firestorm cores**. Any uarch (Tiger Lake, Zen1/2/3, Ice Lake, etc.), with more power, can increase its frequency, can offer larger caches, etc., = **much higher performance**.\n\nAnd let's read reddit usernames next time...", "85" ], [ "I should've stopped replying when you claimed \"advanced transistor gating\" was important here. They. Are. Literally. Made. At. The. Same. Foundry.\n\nIn two words, holy goalposts. Y'all are stuck in an \"AMD vs Intel\" loop and I've just about wasted enough time. Read the Anandtech article 3x: it'll be more useful.\n\n > I wouldn't make that claim. 3.1ghz is already pretty high for an ARM chip. I don't think it's gonna clock much higher than that even with active cooling. I think Active cooling is to allow the CPU to sustain the boost for a longer time-frame. We'll see soon enough though.\n\nNope: the A14 is a maximum of 3.0 GHz single-core (exactly 2998 MHz) and 2.9GHz dual-core (2890 MHz). No 3.1 GHz here. Firestorm's IPC & PPC are absolutely groundbreaking.\n\nIt's clear the A14 *is* thermally limited: it is not a coincidence all mobile SoCs have stayed under \\~5W. That is not a limitation of Arm. That is not some intrinsic limitation of ARM. It is more and more looking like a **thermal** limit. \n\nLikewise, other [**Arm CPUs have easily broken 3.3 GHz**](_URL_0_) (if Apple made that leap with the M1, it'd be a 10% boost and it *easily* clears away Zen3's miniscule lead).\n\nThe power budget also goes to the 12 MB increased cache, larger IMC, etc.: it's not *purely* for clocks. \n\n > That's what it consumes at max boost. But power draw decreases dramatically with undervolting while the performance doesn't decrease that much. Getting 90% of the performance for 30-40% less power is pretty common optimization. That's not even counting the fact that Ryzen mobile is monolithic, so there will be less power usage from the IO and memory controller as well.\n\nWhat on Earth has this discussion turned to? Undervolting? You're grasping at straws with flawed, double-standard arguments. If AMD or Intel or Apple or **anyone** could *make their CPUs* at a lower voltage at similar performance, *they would*. Undervolting specifically exploits stability & security for perf/watt **wins** and performance **losses**.\n\nYou casually claim it's fine to kill 10% of AMD / Intel performance: that 10% loss is massive and it means Zen3 has absolutely lost the performance lead at 1C. You can't have your cake and eat it, too. This discussion is going in circles, while you seem unable to admit this pretty basic conclusion.\n\nFirestorm at 1C has the **total perf** lead *and* the **perf/watt** lead. \n\nMonolithic doesn't matter; **it's not close**. You're having an AMD / Intel debate in your head, but simply replacing \"Intel\" with \"Apple\"...\n\n > At max load. But CPU aren't loaded at 100% all the time. \n\nHoly mushrooms. **These are benchmarks. They peg the CPU to 100%**. That is the point of a benchmark, to see a CPU's ***total*** performance. Why should we compare a CPU at 80% vs another CPU at 90%? \n\nGosh, you give someone ***one*** benchmark that contradicts their worldview and they'll start attacking the idea of a benchmark.\n\nYou seem completely oblivious that Arm CPUs also can be undervolted; Arm CPUs can also have monolithic design; Apple's A14 power numbers also include IO, memory, GPU, and a neural engine; benchmarks are designed to test total performance; this is not an AMD vs Intel debate; etc.\n\n > On that note, Apple says they're getting around 15hs of battery life playing video, but video playback doesn't even use the CPU. It uses a decoding asic which uses very very little power. It's not that impressive and well withing what Windows-based laptops can do.\n\nMore goalpost shifting. When did anyone ever talk about battery life? Battery life depends on the screen (a-Si vs IGZO vs LTPS; resolution; gamut; brightness), RAM, WiFi, platform power gating (literally what AMD did with Zen2 APUs, which *you literally just quoted to me two posts ago)*.", "85" ], [ "Sure. But, this is discussed right in the very article that apparently all of us have actually genuinely read:\n\n > Of course, the old argument about having a very wide architecture is that you cannot clock as high as something which is narrower. This is somewhat true; however, I wouldn’t come to any conclusion as to the capabilities of Apple’s design in a higher power device. On the A14 inside of the new iPhones the new Firestorm cores are able to reach 3GHz clock speeds, clocking down to 2.89GHz when there’s two cores active at any time. \n > \n > We’ll be investigating power in more detail in just a bit, but I currently see Apple being limited by the thermal envelope of the actual phones rather than it being some intrinsic clock ceiling of the microarchitecture. **The new Firestorm cores are clocking in now at roughly the same speed any other mobile CPU microarchitecture from Arm even though it’s a significantly wider design – so the argument about having to clock slower because of the more complex design also doesn’t seem to apply in this instance.** It will be very interesting to see what Apple could do not only in a higher thermal envelope device such as a laptop, but also on a wall-powered device such as a Mac.\n\nApple has been steadily increasing core width for a very long time and has consistently maintained blistering clock speeds at very low wattages.\n\nOf course, we'll need to wait for benchmarks on actual M1 hardware, but I'd be **stunned** if Apple kept Firestorm at the same 3GHz peak clock speed while doubling or tripling the TDP.\n\nI mean, Apple has been planning this transition for **years**. I'd genuinely be shocked if ***this whole time***, their uarch was stunted at 3 GHz & mobile TDPs.", "85" ], [ "Why do people like you comment on articles while willfully refusing to take a step back and realize that you might be incorrect?\n\n1. The CPU core is **Firestorm**. It is the **same** in A14 and M1.\n2. A14 (which has half the TDP of M1) nearly beats Zen3. If you cannot **extrapolate** this data to the conclusion that M1 **will** be the faster CPU in 1T benchmarks (which the author has kindly provided repeat examples to explain **why** the extrapolation is more than expected), then I question how you understand any SPEC2006 benchmarks.\n3. SPEC2006 is an *incredibly* intensive benchmark. Fuck it, nope: not wasting my time.\n\nPlease do not comment on articles you do not **want** to understand. There is **no** requirement to comment. I'm genuinely curious. Do just go find random articles that you don't understand, repeatedly claim you **do** understand them, and then make wildly inaccurate claims?\n\nGenuinely, I'd love to hear why you commented. What was the point? 99% of the benchmarks are running SPEC2006. SPEC2006 is incredibly power-intensive.\n\nIt pushed a 5950X to **49W on a single-core test**. It has 16 cores for 105W TDP / 142W PPT.\n\nWe should not need to spoon feed you every piece of information to fill in your ignorance. Figure this data out on your own. This sort of **firm** ignorance is your **own** responsibility at this point.\n\nNext time, if you don't understand: don't comment, and ***just ask Google first***. \"Hey, is SPEC2006 an intensive benchmark? Where could I learn about TDP vs performance? What are the similarities between A14 and M1? What is a Firestorm core?\"\n\nExtremely dense is being too kind.", "85" ], [ "\"Senior Editor at Anandtech \\[and the former Leading Competitive Analysis Engineer at Imagination Technologies\\] Making Projections on uArch Scaling from Hundreds of SPEC2006fp/int Benchmarks.\"\n\n\"A random redditor making random assumptions with zero testing, zero counterclaims, and little to zero understanding of the methodology\"\n\nTo you: these are the same.\n\nNobody has claimed Anandtech is perfect, but when people willfully refuse to engage in the most basic tenets of benchmarking while refusing to provide a shred of evidence and all they can stand on is, \"Well, **I** don't believe the conclusion,\" you know we live in a post-truth world.\n\nDisagreement isn't an argument. Disagreement isn't a foundation for a debate. Disagreement, in this sense, morphs into trolling. If you have a problem with their testing, we are all **waiting** to see it.\n\nCheers, oscarmendonca.", "370" ], [ "Attaboy, Western Digital: memories are short, but I'm going to keep this one a little longer than usual.\n\nAfter SMR, after RPM \"mislabelling\", I've felt like it's never been easier to move to enterprise drives and decidedly avoid Western Digital in pure spite (and that NAS-capable HDDs are mostly a commodity and the differences are tiny between all three megacorps).\n\nGood to see ground-level benchmarking (i.e., most reviews of WD Reds were CMR, while most consumers were buying SMR) - > press coverage - > pulled recommendations ([**a la Anandtech**](_URL_0_)) - > a few lawsuits being filed - > WD realizes, sometimes, it *is* more profitable to be honest.\n\nStill, the triopoly [**remains strong**](_URL_1_); still, no marketwide labelling push across all drives (aka \"self-regulation\", i.e,.: imagine SSDs being sold without any indication of SLC/MLC/TLC/QLC); still, no regulation or other gov't legal consequences against WD.\n\nYet, I won't refuse to admit I'm happy that we made a little movement, together with all of you. Cheers, /r/datahoarder and to many more!", "448" ], [ "Because the retroactive uploads are only being kept in good faith. Making **old photos** uploaded under the unlimited storage count against the 2021 15 GB cap would cause untold horror: many people have blown past 15 GB, so Google would nuke their reputation had they began forcing payments and/or deleting those photos.\n\nIt's necessary (though you could argue it's **always** been necessary, but Google found it far too appealing to snare millions of users with essentially a years-long trial offer) because some 28 billion photos and videos are uploaded to Google Photos [**every week**](_URL_0_).\n\nAt four trillion now, Photos is now adding **1.4 trillion images** per year. I assume Google is comfortable hosting, for free, six to seven trillion photos & videos **total** but not ~~eight~~ ~~nine~~ ~~ten~~ ~~11~~ ~~12 13~~ ~~14~~ ~~15~~ ~~16~~ ~~trillion photos.~~", "99" ], [ "Apple's SVP of Software Engineering <PERSON> said [**\"We are not direct booting alternative operating systems\"**](_URL_2_) when asked about updating Apple's [**Boot Camp application**](_URL_0_) for Apple Silicon.\n\n > Unless there's an ARM alternative with similar performance or you don't want to be locked on Apple's ecosystem, x86 will live on.\n\nArm's X-1 gets *closer*, but even it is ***years*** away from simply matching M1. Hat tip to /r/Veedrac, cited in Anandtech's [**recent article**](_URL_1_),\n\n > A **+-630 deep ROB** is an immensely huge out-of-order window for Apple’s new core, as it vastly outclasses any other design in the industry. Intel’s Sunny Cove and Willow Cove cores are the second-most “deep” OOO designs out there with a **352** ROB structure, while AMD’s newest Zen3 core makes due with **256** entries, and recent Arm designs such as the Cortex-X1 feature a **224** structure.\n\nM1 can't even be described as a Conroe or Zen3 moment, both which made—what PC hardware enthusiasts previously considered—landmark and unexpected leaps in perf & perf/watt.\n\nIt's genuinely a bigger *general computing* leap than either, but it doesn't feel like it yet because it's single-vendor, single-OS.\n\nPerhaps we'll all be running NUVIA's or...Arm's standard CPUs in the 2030s.", "85" ], [ "> Apple has more money and resources than God\n\nTo be fair, many tech giants have made similar profits relative to Apple. They just never gave enough shits to do it, i.e., Arm architecture licenses have been available for decades now.\n\nThe [**most profitable U.S. companies**](_URL_0_)\n\n|Rank by Revenue|Company|Profits as of March 2020|\n|:-|:-|:-|\n|**4**|Apple|***$55,256***|\n|**21**|Microsoft|***$39,240***|\n|**11**|Alphabet|***$34,343***|\n|**45**|Intel|***$21,048***|\n|**46**|Facebook|***$18,845***|\n\nI left Facebook in due to their [**independent data centers**](_URL_1_).\n\nMicrosoft makes 71% the profits of Apple, *but they simply did not care enough*. It was never important enough. It was never critical or required or demanded.\n\nAgain, I note these are **profits** and not revenue, so this money could've been used anywhere. I think spending that on defining the next era of computing (personal, business, enterprise, HPC) would have probably been a good bet.\n\nEDIT: corrected to 2020 data and not 2009 data (which was not 2009 inflation-adjusted, as I assumed); thank you to /u/cookingboy for the correction.", "21" ], [ "Absolutely fair. I agree. But <PERSON> claims iPhones switching to type-C will be a **universal** good.\n\niPhones switching to type-C, and leaving it at that, would be horrible for e-waste. It would be just as worse, if not worse, than the micro-USB e-waste nightmare.\n\nWith over one billion iPhones today and *each* using Lightning, the cables will lose all longevity *unless* Apple starts bundling adapters.\n\nWhat <PERSON> (or anyone who thought about this more than 10 minutes...who does that? Nobody. But if you're going to make an *entire video*...) should've advocated for: switch to type-C and **include** Lightning adapters.\n\n<PERSON>'s ignorant solution (\"Apple, switch to type-C, hihi\") makes the problem he \"cares about\" far worse. Like, why bother to claim you care about the environment and then suggest something that will send cable e-waste into the stratosphere?", "21" ], [ "Please don't delete this comment: I gave a hearty laugh. Unfortunately, this is the issue with Arun's content: he has zero critical thinking. There's just *nothingness* behind the claims.\n\nGood luck.\n\n1. Micro-B ***is*** filling up landfills around the world. The design of the cable means *nothing* to e-waste. The micro-B cable was functional and got thrown away because people wanted the *convenience* of type-C. Read that sentence again. Some hundred thousand tons of e-waste for ***convenience***. \n2. No environmental element in the mix \"back then\"? 😂 Do you think landfills did not exist five years ago? Where did all those micro-B cables go, friend?\n3. Nope. <PERSON>, again, looks like a fool. How many people *didn't need nor use* the included accessories? <PERSON> is dumbfounded. Amazon has *long* been criticized for the excessive packaging and Amazon is *fiendishly* good at optimizing everything. They can't optimize boxes? <PERSON> has drunk the Kool Aid. If you only had a type-C port, why wouldn't you buy a type-C to headphone **adapter**? <PERSON> is dumbfounded. Like, lmao, <PERSON>: ***people have earphones.*** \n\n<PERSON>'s content is some of the worst and poorly thought-out phone content and it shows. Zero thinking. He just...talks.\n\nHe suggests iPhones should switch to type-C. That is the ***definition*** of a half-baked argument. Where on Earth does <PERSON> think all the Lightning cables are going to go? The proper environmental stance, which Android manufacturers almost wholly fucked up, is 1) switch to type-C ***and*** 2) include adapters so everyone can continue using their old cables.", "21" ], [ "Thank you for the reply. I agree with your major point here that micro-B has *more* residual value than Lightning, if Lightning were to be phased out, but the difference is not that large. That is, many accessories come with their own micro-B cable anyways. \n\n > It's primary because you still need them for stuffs like DualShock 4 Controller and (in my case) a rechargable USB Mouse.\n\nBy 2017, Android phones had just transitioned to type-C. I'd say it's fair to say most 2016 and earlier Android devices were all micro-B. That meant [**\\~2 billion Android phones**](_URL_1_) that came with a micro-B cable. How many iPhones use Lightning? [**About 1 billion**](_URL_0_) and likely less.\n\nEven if \\~30% of those micro-B cables got reused (like the DualShock 4 that didn't come with a cable), micro-B still introduced far more e-waste than if Apple dropped Lightning *today*.\n\nI'm making an assumption that cables last roughly as long as the device (not how long one person owns it, but how long the device remains active under any owner), so we're using *active* devices (roughly meaning working cables).\n\nI agree with the argument overall, but I think <PERSON> severely and completely missed the mark...because he didn't think about his video (and it even contradicts his own previous videos!): adapters, multi-port USB power adapters, the micro-USB **lesson** that Apple should learned from, and repair practices. And, maybe just maybe, the craven consumerism...but I'm not sure [**most phone reviewers**](_URL_2_) are ready for that conversation.\n\nHe mentioned *none* of those and unfortunately his terrible recommendations would actually greatly increase e-waste. I agree with his concept, but I only replied here because of the very poor video. :(", "927" ], [ "Not at all. \n\nApple's push is to end **all** devices shipping with single-port USB chargers. These single-port chargers are the *absolute* worst for e-waste. \n\nPeople don't realize Apple isn't the first: ***many*** products have eschewed single-port chargers. Cameras, console controllers, power banks, wireless chargers = very few come with a USB wall charger.\n\nThe entire industry should move towards zero chargers included and all devices using USB-PD. Then, people buy *one* multi-port charger for all their devices.\n\nMuch less waste overall. You don't shrink one box here; you shrink hundreds of boxes here over a consumer's lifetime. That does lessen *overall* environmental impacts.", "21" ], [ "> Having several around the house is essential.\n\nThat is not typical. **Most** people charge their phone once a day.\n\n > Not to mention if people want to utilize fast charging its 100% necessary to buy a new charger. \n\nThis was almost ***always*** true. Faster charging also can increase battery degradation which increases its own e-waste. An inconsistent position.\n\n > People won’t stop buying charging bricks because they’re not included.\n\nCorrection: consumers are less likely to buy *single-port* chargers now because **multiple** devices do not include single-port chargers. This is an enormous win for e-waste. One multi-port e-waste < < < < ten single-port bundled or otherwise chargers' e-waste\n\nPeople complaining about **boxes** (which can be recycled) have severely and utterly missed the point. The main issue is **electronic waste**, which for the most part can never be fully recycled.\n\n > Personally, I use every charging brick I’ve ever received in an Apple product box. \n\nAt some point, these anecdotes aren't useful nor relevant. Apple nor camera manufacturers nor accessory manufacturers need to cater to specific use-cases.\n\n > \"There are also over **2 billion Apple power adapters** out there in the world, and that's not counting the **billions of third-party adapters**. We're removing these items from the iPhone box, which reduces carbon emissions and avoids the mining and use of precious materials.\"\n\nEnough already. Two billion of **any charger** is insane. I already think it's time to stop bundling cables, but y'all aren't ready for that argument. I can only hope Apple et al are more interested.", "380" ], [ "> I didn't say landfills didn't exist back then. People just didn't care.\n\nI hate to be the one to tell you, but [many people cared](_URL_0_) about e-waste and pre-teen YouTubers like <PERSON> *just were too young* to care. \n\nIf you \"just started caring\", then why not learn about the issue first? Why arrogantly barge in with half-baked arguments? His asinine \"takes\" actually make the issue worse.\n\nThe best thing for pre-teen YouTubers to do is 1) stop talking, 2) do the reading, 3) don't put out elementary school arguments. <PERSON> is a 25-year-old man-child. \n\n*Any* high school's environmental studies class would've failed <PERSON> for his \"I wrote this 10 minutes before class, lmao\" BS.\n\n**TL;DR Why talk about micro-USB? Because <PERSON> is advocating for the same, foolish games people did back then and it significantly increased e-waste.**", "999" ], [ "> **Units:** About 32,000 (In addition, about 1,024 were sold in Canada)\n\nGood God. NZXT is as *stupid* as they come: terribly mishandled publicly until GN repeatedly shamed them. All of this could've been easily prevented with the [***bare*** **minimum of effort**](_URL_0_). And the H1 was marketed as a $300+ premium, high-quality SFF case. What is lurking in NZXT's *cheaper* PCIe riser products? Was the $300 not enough?\n\nI appreciated the Samsung Note 7 comparison. 92 reports from 1 million Note 7s (**0.0092%**) versus 11 from 32,000 H1 cases (**0.034%**) at the time the recall went public. Of course numbers will adjust over time, but *as of now* (with all these terrible statistics) the NZXT H1 has a higher incident rate than the Note 7.\n\nGotta love me some pro-public health, anti-fire-hazard, pro-zero-smoke federal regulations and a responsive oversight agency.", "493" ], [ "> Google doesn't share this information with anyone else\n\nIt literally does. For everyone who needs a reputable, clear explanation:\n\n_URL_0_\n\nGoogle not only shares your data, but creates the entire marketplace to sell your data. \n\n > Google shares data with advertisers directly and asks them to bid on individual ads.\n\n > Real-time bidding is the process by which publishers auction off ad space in their apps or on their websites. In doing so, they share sensitive user data—including geolocation, device IDs, identifying cookies, and browsing history—with dozens or hundreds of different adtech companies. \n\n > Inside an app, AdMob code collects information and shares it with Google and other exchanges through processes called “open bidding” and “mediation.” Your phone shares data, including your device ID and geolocation data, with Google and with other ad exchanges; the app serves you an ad; Google and the developer get paid.", "99" ], [ "Nope. It’s perfectly clear that Google does provide your rough location to ad brokers. How do you think ads target you?\n\n_URL_0_\n\nGoogle tracks your precise location (aka your address). Its advertisers track your rough location. \n\nWhy should YouTube or my Google account even require my precise location? Because it’s all one Google account and because Google Maps tracks your location into an enormous pool of data that advertisers just love.", "99" ] ]
160
[ 14232, 17534, 19483, 19512, 18512, 16552, 5422, 5158, 10793, 4395, 21950, 20272, 14941, 24565, 23497, 284, 16335, 11239, 25050, 924, 9435, 1974, 12677, 24003, 6105, 20840, 21609, 7588, 22629, 14942, 18051, 2128, 8523, 8946, 14893, 1761, 4283, 21993, 7721, 20980, 20453, 15448, 23143, 129, 19979, 1331, 23574, 10929, 14722, 16430, 4508, 7708, 12751, 16644, 18722, 20400, 25457, 5839, 9316, 22420, 10505, 20728, 22558, 525, 24804, 14604, 22203, 2600, 17286, 18088, 4411, 25235, 653, 8204, 13832, 14233, 20863, 19175, 4722, 4866, 8262, 21936, 2348, 779, 22115, 18658, 8782, 9452, 20700, 15267, 22549, 4250, 21334, 8711, 19828, 12442, 23258, 1721, 18841, 8035, 21251, 22376, 9075, 16953, 20924, 5010, 1657, 16140, 10851, 9216, 16413, 10741, 843, 25330, 17163, 6495, 13468, 8344, 19842, 22180, 4242, 11749, 17053, 4668, 9768, 2383, 1360, 1476, 20789, 18422, 19267, 13002, 6331, 12341, 7236, 13188, 14822, 19742, 847, 18659, 18960, 1773, 19377, 19994, 16723, 17222, 2421, 3260, 16350, 6712, 15686, 22178, 9330, 19949, 11257, 12855, 14808, 20035, 19342, 21909, 3137, 6510, 17894, 17875, 774, 24227, 6661, 16582, 2496, 24753, 24128, 16037, 11148, 6086, 11594, 20433, 5702, 9669, 22283, 10603, 9557, 22270, 49, 6344, 21198, 3189, 2202, 15162, 6819, 18176, 23487, 1973, 13982, 1377, 20328, 20540, 20708, 16690, 23324, 16967, 14196, 215, 8290, 74, 4973, 15004, 5914, 9205, 14383, 17221, 15476, 5013, 19971, 18089, 4830, 9305, 19480, 11590, 24022, 14336, 5757, 15320, 15854, 4636, 17840, 19714, 13871, 975, 12754, 12837, 24972, 14692, 18843, 18056, 8793, 3342, 8885, 1868, 6390, 19982, 15511, 19468, 3994, 19024, 2773, 23038, 13456, 10706, 1207, 1885, 8582, 23178, 11416, 19224, 17545, 5219, 8418, 22045, 16152, 4471, 14372, 13467, 14143, 3377, 472, 22522, 3252, 15360, 20833, 3040, 44, 13340, 19578, 22234, 12897, 17550, 23613, 2914, 15848, 23093, 3497, 15964, 2325, 18629, 15310, 16166, 1741, 409, 17591, 11013, 23661, 24173, 11866, 2734, 19954, 10945, 18752, 21379, 20188, 5644, 316, 1663, 18719, 21705, 3941, 11843, 18370, 5281, 966, 21440, 9104, 13232, 1037, 19466, 1922, 5575, 15135, 5962, 11017, 628, 15762, 23155, 9779, 7234, 24594, 3017, 6145, 25145, 4500, 16030, 1408, 13005, 18720, 12210, 5556, 12256, 21784, 19937, 19797, 24817, 21650, 16827, 2872, 18979, 12100, 21124, 23803, 15021, 9157, 25443, 25289, 4037, 19146, 12513, 15538, 13537, 21921, 3428, 15960, 14423, 22547, 13080, 17349, 20632, 17184, 2314, 1417, 8440, 8553, 23408, 1096, 24695, 4908, 12505, 7237, 12413, 14700, 7499, 17763, 23631, 1789, 23672, 16348, 13212, 18280, 13658, 16438, 20862, 11541, 10146, 17744, 21742, 22343, 685, 13333, 20345, 18264, 1542, 8680, 21525, 15706, 300, 2004, 15224, 11466, 21953, 3398, 2839, 4648, 15682, 4989, 2696, 11009, 1953, 16402, 1580, 21499, 23449, 101, 15331, 20658, 21612, 19017, 1918, 328, 1103, 16705, 24509, 17767, 15020, 17930, 15045, 1210, 21930, 6418, 18278, 5097, 5159, 22895, 22196, 3417, 22749, 3957, 1235, 18714, 18770, 15973, 13670, 17288, 23286, 17761, 11671, 11986, 5578, 20567, 6181, 16439, 18239, 11156, 17638, 11071, 4213, 21058, 21580, 8122, 2629, 18475, 5650, 8050, 22783, 23174, 10722, 16769, 2444, 568, 15711, 22584, 11949, 13026, 2122, 11431, 18932, 10827, 19601, 24345, 18331, 22685, 8525, 25505, 18996, 6502, 24262, 12420, 12703, 1341, 15481, 2709, 10163, 23466 ]
reddit_dump_-redditardation-
[ [ "- > Saw this.\n\n - > Not the Onion.\n\n - > Saw a comment linking how someone makes a jelly knife. Watch it this is incredible: _URL_0_\n\n - > We only want 'common sense knife control'.\n\n - > Ban everything because even jelly is an 'assault weapon'.\n\n - > Watch population starve.\n\nGod, the nukes can't come soon enough. This nonsense needs a hard reset.", "702" ], [ "I guessed right. You're a liar.\n\nCalling a timeout you got for being a libelous, genocidal turd that desired the rape of an innocent bystander as well as managed to collectively defame all people with any heritage from a nation a ban when it was just the mods actually enforcing the rules of the site.\n\nI'll do people the favour and type out the linked comment:\n\n > \"OP's mother mother deserves to get raped. Also all white people should be murdered. Also all Germans are rapists. Also, <PERSON> is a pedophile. If you critisise this post, you're a bluepilled communist.\"", "743" ], [ "Corrected in accordance with your comment. They were honest typing mistakes. I wouldn't have needed to insert any errors into that post to make it look bad. 2x the same word, also 3x in a row & criti**s**ise.\n\nIt saves people the effort of needing to click through. Since I obviously can't edit other people's posts I can't really update their post to include it. Also didn't think posting something twice was necessary but now that you mention it I will leave it as a comment under the other post.", "809" ], [ "This video touches on specifically this subject:\n\n_URL_1_\n\nAnother interesting example that I believe comes from less kosher sources is for example the reality that US states that are super majority white with a very similar population to Australia have a lower homicide rate. Now I didn't dig indepth to verify this since the source isn't without it's bias but given the massive disparity in guns owned it seems to illustrate that guns =/= violence.\n\nA related video that touches on firearms ownership but isn't directly related to Australia or the US would be this one:\n\n_URL_0_\n\nThe solution is pretty simple. We don't restrict people's rights arbitrarily. Just as we don't ban people from having cars/vans/trucks because some people decide to car/van/truck of peace people.\n\nSuicide is your right. Including suicide deaths as gundeaths is what is done by gun grabbers to create the false trend that guns = homicide because the trend isn't so if you do not include suicides. This is a moral question and if you believe people have the right to their own beings then you must also conclude they have the right to end their own existence. Whether they do this with a few grams of lead administered to the head or a pill in a hospital shouldn't be anyone's concern.\n\nAustralia started out pretty fascist if I'm not mistaken. There are no protections for free expression or only limited ones and your govt. stripped you of the right to defend yourselves. Nonetheless Australia is doing better than many other Western nations such as e.g.: the USA which has the NSA and CIA spying on everyone and they have tools they can use to extrajudicially execute anyone, meanwhile the UK is banning kitchen utensils and convicting people for jokes under hate-speech even when no one complained as well as charging thousands of people for being offensive, Germany's hate-speech laws are so loose anything can count as in any identifiable group that gets offended so yes saying bad stuff about Jihadis is hate-speech and you have this very case with the German govt. funding an ex-Osama body guard meanwhile they police what people can see online and the person in charge of this NGO that polices what people can see online is an ex-Stasi (East German KGB equivalent) operative who was spoken not guilty in what many consider a sham trial which only lasted 2-3 weeks. They've all turned totalitarian it's just they're doing it relatively slowly enough and with enough control & influence over media, public discourse and the likes so as not to alert the people. My guess is someone more familiar with Australia would have similarly damning points to bring up, I believe the anti-discrimination laws there are extremely open to abuse for example.", "701" ], [ "Yes and what that judge is saying is stupid and extremely dangerous to freedom. It is also incidentally what the govt. thinks given the fact that:\n\n - They literally referece a rule banning sale of knives to younger people and how the judge acknowledges that law was a failure.\n\n - The UK recently proposed banning the online sale of knives requiring pickup of chef knives and ID.\n\n - There are already a multitude of laws in the UK 'banning knives' which can result in prison time and lawful citizen carrying a knife for whatever reason has the onus to prove he is innocent (_URL_0_).\n\nDimwitted ~~gun~~ knife grabber appeasers.", "651" ], [ "<PERSON> I've pointed out in some response that if an-com is to succeed and not be tyranny or create a violent revolution where tyrants seize power it has to effectively follow the lines of something like communalism however I personally do not get hung up on labels so an an-com that rejects violent revolution because they have seen through its flaws (technically an an-synd) but also sees that democracy is flawed and accepts that communism must be able to exist in a world where systems compete would be find by me and I wouldn't get too bogged down on labels although they would then technically be mutualists.", "870" ], [ "On principle 2. after all the constitution is tyranny. *Granted it was expressly designed with knowledge of tyrants and to hamper them and with minimum tyranny in mind but it is unjust authority after all.*\n\nPlaces should be allowed to decide how they live. Furthermore solution 1 while it might sound more appealing to some since they might falsely assume it would prevent mass tyranny would likely fail in little to no time since there are too many places that would outright reject such governance because it is too different from what they wish to do. Finally any decent An-Caps running the show in solution 1 would when confronted with a demand for secession from Commiefornia say you were always free to go.", "593" ], [ "You're leaving out the economic one which is the tragedy of the commons.\n\nGeo-libertarianism is at the end of the day just communist trickery. Under it no one can own anything instead it is only ever leased to you by the collective. In other words all things are at the end of the day at the whim of absolute democracy.\n\nGenerally simply fencing off an area wouldn't suffice for homesteading. You'd need to improve the land otherwise or occupy it otherwise. If you do well then you're either living on it or working it.\n\nA land tax while definitley in principle not ideal is in practice fairly good since it does tend to lead to limited taxation. Of course as you accurately note a problem with this that arises is govt. quickly does what it always does and makes it worse by changing the rules so now it's not a barebones land tax but rather city rates+housing tax+mandatory contributions to X, Y and Z.\n\nAnother thing to consider here is that your right of movement argument could be used to justify no locks on houses and that anyone can at any time watch you take a sh*t in the bathroom or jerk it in bed. Generally a solution to this would likely naturally evolve with it costing more to police large sparsely used plots than it is worth.", "1013" ], [ "Federal govt. was definitely a mistake and I'm sure if the people who thought it up would've seen what it did in 1913 they'd have burned the parchment they wrote it on.\n\nThe problem with govt. is it tends to beget more govt. Even if you approach something with the very best intentions anything you mandate tends to backfire. A law making free speech a right either ends up with a totalitarian spying program surveilling all people to make sure 'all speech is free' and then some thugs that collect up the 'wrong-thinkers' and make them disappear or increasing restrictions on what exactly is speech and what isn't a la 'hate speech'. The federal govt. very much followed this general idea.", "865" ], [ "What's the point in freedom of people don't choose my way of life?\n\nThe freedom part.\n\nThe underlying framework to maintain it should be kept in order but it should never become prescriptive. Freedom doesn't mean you must be ultimately free and have pan-sexual gangbangs while shooting up heroin and shooting a flamethrower in the air all while engaging in some amputation play. Is the guy reading his book at home objectively expressing less freedom? Yes and no depending how you measure it and that is precisely the point. The observer's perspective measures it. If someone wishes to live in such a way then doing so would be but the same applies to the guy just reading a book.", "651" ], [ "They would hear from your rights enforcement agency (and very likely every normal persons' who sees the videos since pretty much everyone seems to find this stuff uncool). Alternately you could laugh or shoot them.\n\nWhat's worth noting is a lot of these 'pranks' or similar videos are either in part or wholly staged. Whether this is an example of that I am not sure but it is something that is worth keeping in mind. After all WWE was all fake and I remember a time when people didn't all ubiquitously know this so faking some YouTube videos is definitely not beyond the means of people.", "138" ], [ "Without govts. there very likely wouldn't be nukes so that is worth keeping in mind. Most biological warfare agents were also researched and weaponized by governments. Granted they would still exist otherwise since many of them are around in nature but the odds that they'd be sufficiently weaponized would be significantly lower.\n\nJustification for nukes would be difficult to argue as anything but an offensive weapon and thus an aggression. There would be cases where it might be defensive but this would very likely be an An-Capistan getting itself in on the nuke game because Statist nations 1 through 100 threaten to invade/Tomahawk it all to rubble if they don't raise taxes to 10%.\n\nReally every issue raised here is a problem in a statist world and likely is the product to a large degree of states so this wouldn't really be an argument against no states.\n\nExtending land claims would require you to move your construction inward. If that is what they do then sure why not.\n\nCan a company choose to work as a democratically run company? Sure why not. Workers collectives or 'representative workers collectives' would be fine.\n\nCompanies could set policies and people could then choose to work there or not. This is no different to current situations. Setting certain policies that are clearly predatory would likely result in many rights enforcement agencies getting on the companies ass.", "23" ], [ "You could buy the land but doing so in exactly the manner you describe would be a hostile act of aggression.\n\nAs such it would be challenged very quickly and you would likely need to provide movement at certain places or deal with being labelled an aggressor and have the rights enforement agencies of 320 million people show up on your doorstep. Thus such a thing would be very unwise to try.\n\nForeign govts. haven't tried to invade in forever and generally strong economic ties are the best way to prevent this. Nonetheless people could simply pool money for a defensive army if you need one but honestly everyone having tons of guns and private tanks and jets would probably sufficiently dissuade most hostile forces. No to mention any hostile forces would tend to be much, much smaller since they can't rely on mass extraction of wealth from a massive economy to fund warmongering. Govt. made warfare much more dangerous not safer. They literally almost wiped out the world for 30 years.\n\nIf you prevent an invasion you would be owed compensation if it was agreed upon. Otherwise it would be charity. Most people would likely contract with rights enforcement agencies that contract with defense firms for this but in general war is very expensive and unless you can hide the cost via inflation it isn't very popular. No one wants to pay for a war. 90% of wars would never have been fought if people were given a bill for it at the beginning like would happen in a market and another 9% would likely have been abandoned when the price estimate tripled.", "1014" ], [ "Corporations don't have nukes. I don't know a single one that does.\n\nYou don't just 'make a nuke'. The development costs are astronomical and since the nuke provides very limited utility since it really only serves one purpose, turning a giant area into an irratiadet shithole it doesn't help you with most problems and would often times make things worse for you.\n\nYou know there's nothing stopping e.g.: the US or Russia turning North Korea or Syria into a glowing green wasteland. They don't do it because the fallout (metaphorical) would be so devastating.\n\nNow when you consider that the US govt. had its nuke safety codes on 00000000 for around 20 years you realize why if we must have someone with nukes please don't let it be the people that run the DMV (and this is probably great by comparison since places like Pakistan and China have them as well). There probably would be some select firms that do have nukes since my guess is you might want some to deal with asteroids but they'd likely need to pass a lot of transparency tests to not end up with the entire world pointing missiles at them. My guess is they would essentially be held in trust by the world with all major rights enforcement agencies guarding them and the protocols necessary to launch them would likely be so stringent that the only way you pass those is with something that is sufficiently unifying e.g.: apocalypse.", "470" ], [ "The first paragraph addresses one of the big economic arguments for private property. One that you did not mention.\n\nIf London turned An-Cap tomorrow? No it would likely be much the same. Funny that you picked London because that's one of the only places a private city (or something approaching it) exists, City of London Corporation (it isn't a feudal society which incidentally is better than most people get today, imagine being given a house and a plot of land -some means- from which you can make a living for your family in exchange for only 3-10% of your income but that's another story and of course open to interpretation and there were clear abuses not to mention the issue of judging the past by current standards).\n\nIt is more a moral problem than anything else. If you must pay rent (a land tax is at the end of the day rent with extra steps) for your own property you do not own it. The govt. then owns pretty much everything by definition and what you call ownership is actually just a privilege. In terms of economic problems there is the issue that it fundamentally draws all property rights into question which likely won't end well and that the fee will likely increase. If it were just some barebones limited fee as you describe which would probably come in at someting like 20 bucks per acre per year it would probably solve a lot more problems than it creates (assuming you get rid of other taxes). This would hit rural folks harder and you'd have to deal with the massive fallout that would inevitably come with 1 in 8 people being told they can no longer be rentseekers (that's approximately the amount of govt. employed people as a share of the workforce) but every once in a while a big shake up isn't a bad thing.", "224" ], [ "> <PERSON> is a conservative\n\nWhat does that have to do with anything? Govt. is govt. Sure conservative these days might more often than not hold some classical liberal values but they are on average still lefties that are 10-30 years late.\n\n > <PERSON> type who thinks that we are in danger of being swamped by Asians and Muslims.\n\nYou probably will just like the rest of the Western world. The question is at what rate. I'd presume slightly slower since Australia has maintained fairly strict immigration policies. This isn't anything anyone denies. Demographers are predicting these things everywhere in the West. Nonetheless the real question is will it be Chinese or Muslims. Love it or hate it it is the future of the West.\n\n > Trust me as an Australian we have our fair share of racists who aren't locked up because of hate speech laws\n\nHate speech is free speech. It doesn't mean you have to like racists and you should use your speech to mock them.\n\nIndonesia would have little issue annexing Australia at some point in the future but why would it? Indonesia has far more to gain from developing its own natural resources including labour.\n\n > Most Australians view American gun laws as a horrible joke and laugh at the thought of their liberties being stripped\n\nAnd at some point in the future they like others will regret this.\n\nNonetheless you evidently didn't watch the videos.", "348" ], [ "> Even if the public had guns what good is that going to do against government funded military trained troops. With tanks and drones\n\nThis point always makes me think anyone who says it just isn't engaging with the idea sincerely or maybe they just never were introduced to the idea.\n\nIn short who has the US constantly been losing its wars against? Backwards farmers with AKs and pickup vans. Be it the endless insurgencies in the Middle East, Vietnamese rice farmers or North Koreans.\n\nWe'll take ISIS with estimated fighter numbers ranging between 30,000-80,000. They managed to keep 2 superpowers busy and 2 nations armies.\n\nFor comparison there are 130,000,000 gun owners in the US.\n\nIf we were to use the median ISIS value of 55,000 that's 2350 ISISes which means for every ISIS equivalent of armed US citizens with a better education, more wealth, more vehicles/tools/etc. the US Army (which hands down wins every military fight on paper and is so large it could compete with the next 3 largest militaries) has 500 soldiers and 2/3rds of a fighting aircraft. How long do you think the US military would last if those were the odds? And that's presuming the most favourable conditions which would be that all the soldiers are suicidal and wish to fight door to door at odds of around 1:100 which no one who has ever done such work would do. In reality half would likely defect and the rest would then surrender but of course even one defector from each base is enough intel to leave them unable to function as a consequence of retaliation within a day or two.\n\nJust to really put that into perspective. Unlike the 30,000-80,000 ISIS fighters those 130,000,000 US gun owners would be comparable to the total population of the nations of all the 'major conflicts' the US has been involved in at those points in time namely around 42,000,000 Vietnamese + 11,000,000 North Koreans + 27,000,000 Iraqis + 23,000,000 Afghanis and 19,000,000 Syrians all armed.\n\nState militaries are rather poor at fighting people and insurgencies. They are useful against other state militaries.", "1014" ], [ "Typical leftist lying.\n\nHe has pointed out that in a libertarian propertarian order obviously democrats and communists must be removed if this order is to be maintained the same way one might need to remove puritans from a nudist commune.\n\nHe doesn't prefer dictatorship merely points out how monarchy is a better option than democracy and going on the extend of govt. this is true. Rarely did monarchies manage to get to even half of the theft of modern democracies and where their theft was usually spend it was frivolous which while it may look bad on the surface is better than pumping it into dependency programs militarization and similar.\n\nMan you're hilarious. Bringing up <PERSON> in a first comment. You guys outdo yourselves.", "627" ], [ "Why would this be dumb? Besides using a single name that has come to be associated with a certain person, that is poor titling.\n\nYou have the right to refuse people service. You are after all not their slave and they are not entitled to demand anything from you.\n\nThe left embracing this would be a good thing, the left using it selectively arguably is also a good thing because it serves to illlustrate their blatant hypocrisy and might help unite anyone who isn't already a useful idiot for the left against them.", "965" ], [ "You are hardwired into your being. Thus you cannot sell yourself since even when you sell yourself you are still your own master.\n\nYou can play slave or sex toy or whatever you please for as long as it amuses you but you are free to go whenever you please.\n\nProperty doesn't have rights, people have rights to property. This is correct.\n\nThe majority of ideologies on the right assume natural rights i.e.: the view that people have some inherent rights. The left's philosophers attempt to refute this axiom largely by attacking God and that without a divine being no 'true natural rights' can exist. They are right in a theoretical sense on this argument. Nonetheless both in a practical sense they are wrong since every person I have ever encountered believes in some natural rights. This is why they are offended by certain inhumane things and when pressed none of them think that a society where rape, torture, slavery and similar things are the norm is acceptible even if they argue 'rights don't exist'. So there appears to be something innate to humanity that values some degree of natural rights (although this isn't a fixed quantity and does shift around), this in turn at least to a significant degree refutes the argument that you need God for rights. If rights weren't real after all a society based around keeping women as breeding vats and raping them that then engages in conquest of neighbours and enslaves the men while using the women as rape torture toys and eating the children would be 'no less moral' than any other since after all they all just are and exist in a world where good and evil are just social constructs.\n\nIronically this is also the general argument for you don't need a God to be moral without which the left which tends to place very high value on atheism would be in a real pickle but they are happy to ignore this when it is practical to push postmodernism.", "1013" ], [ "> Not really because you have to factor in the cost of slave revolts and the lack of incentive for their work.\n\nYou are aware of the fact that this only became a ubiquitous truth after the end of such systems and capitalism to a greater or lesser degree was embraced almost everywhere? This is exactly the point I am making and your response only sures it up.\n\nI cannot imagine a better world therefore what is bad now is good. People in the future will look back on the evil of the state the same way we look back on those times.\n\nI don't remember him to be a statist bootlicker so I don't see why I would call him that. Furthermore the example says all that needs to be said.", "778" ], [ "> How do we measure this claim? Because an ancap said so? Just lmfao.\n\nGenerally this has been the course of history. It is so common that even in grade school history you are taught to judge history not on your values but the values at their time as a form of historical empathy. So more like the entire field of history.\n\nCan't say I'm surprised a JQ alt-righter is using the tired 'muh freedoms don't exist it's all a Jewish conspiracy argument'. If we're going on memes your the one who's living up to them.\n\n > All the rights and freedoms they enjoy today were born out of violence and the worst sort of NAP violations.\n\nYou might not be 'high IQ enough' to realize it but you're literally making the following non-argument I mentioned in the previous comment *\"I cannot imagine a better world therefore what is bad now is good\"* as your argument in the follow-up comment.\n\nThe alt-righer is filled with ants standing on the shoulders of giants. The greatest shame is that many of their complaints of racialism amongst other groups and against whites are true and something should be done but those speaking out aren't responding with anything respectable or better they are happy to lower themselves to the same level and play the same dirty game (although to be fair out of some degree of what they think is necessity).", "763" ], [ "The govts. are mercenaries with extra steps and I would say they are near the very bottom end of systems.\n\nI have experience with some variation of the following cartels/gangs/mafia/local hegemons/local authorities and what I can tell you is in every case I have experienced (more than a few less than a significant amount) they are:\n\n - Less headache to deal with\n\n - Lower compliance costs\n\n - Way, way lower overall costs, the 'extortion fees' they charge are chump change compared to even the lower taxation brackets (think 0.1-2% and if they really hate you and you're the guy they want to f*ck over who just shat on their porch you might be the only guy to ever be charged 10%)\n\n - Regulations are almost nonexistent, at least in the sense we tend to know them as. You basically have a list of 2 pages of stuff you can't do and even that stuff can be negotiated for, for a fee (think noise 'regulation' but you want to have a birthday party until the morning so you negotiate with them and they let you have music blaring until 2AM and in exchange you pay them a modest sum and have to let your neighbours know)\n\n - Even the dickheads who show up with knives to threaten you are much easier to reason with and much more interested in working for you than any govt. official ever is. They actively know you contribute so they will work with you on an issue\n\nAny day I will take the low cost of extortion by the local mafia for minor fees and the honesty in that they will show up with heaps of dudes with knives and threaten you (not that I am saying this is ideal but we're obviously in a lesser of two evils discussion) over the ridiculous extortion fees of the state and spineless cuckery that is sending a nice tax man to let you know that if you don't comply they'll be shooting you in tiny fine print no one ever reads.\n\nHonestly it's mindblowing that classical liberals think the state is anything but tyranny when their forefathers had taxation in the range of 2-5% of GDP and these days it is around 35-40% even in the US and in most European nations 40-55% with the Western European ones near the high end. The founding fathers would've had a rebellion going within the hour for current US tax code.\n\nHell under feudalism you paid 3-10% 'tax' and you were given a plot of land and a hovel (although to be fair that hovel was usually built with labour by your kin nonetheless using resources the local lord/count/etc. owned) usually in exchange for that. For reference even under Islamic oppression of unbelievers the 'extortion fee' taxes they were forced to pay to incentivize them to convert were only ever 20%. Think about that. Muslims oppressing Jews & Christians and trying to convert them thought 20% was the most extortion they could allow. This is your lower middle income tax rate in Western nations.\n\nI'm not dogmatic. I'm pragmatic and have seen both sides. I'll happily admit it is possible that you might end up with a roving gang that takes more than govt. but this is exceedingly rare. We are in the top percent or so of worst case scenarios. Plus that roving gang that demands extortion fees higher than Western govts. would end up losing people to gangs that demand lower fees.", "314" ], [ "What about racial collectivist who believes in socialism for white people ever made you think libertarianism?\n\nProbably the SJW infiltrators preaching identity politics and 'libertarian socialis' over at /r/LOLbertarian hey?\n\nThe reason the alt-right hangs around Libertarians is they are one of the last groups to call out anti-discrimination laws and hate-speech laws as the nonsense/totalitarianism they are. Then idiots use 'muh guilt by association' and instead of laughing at them LOLberts cuck and punch right. Not that criticism of the alt-right is illegitimate but actually swallowing the leftist disinformation narrative that Libertarianism is a pipeline to the alt-right and we 'need to fight this'. Stop letting leftist play you like a fiddle and dancing for them the moment they call you a mean word, the same to a lesser degree also applies to the alt-right trying similar shaming tactics (although those are usually rightfully ignored and scoffed at).", "965" ], [ "Disagree.\n\nDemocracy is tyranny and at best communism ends up as the tyranny of the majority. Otherwise we know what it ends up as with the 'dictatorship of the proletariat'. One might say the misery such a thing brings might make one despise absolute authority but that's akin to shooting yourself in the foot to teach gun safety. You probably would slightly reduce gun accidents thereafter but the harm done in the learning process far exceeds any harm prevented.", "593" ], [ "Money is one of the greatest inventions in history. It helps solve the issue of three parties wanting disparate things.\n\nYou're communist vision and its central bank destroyed any true money and turned it into monopoly money. No you're pathetic excuse of it wasn't true communism doesn't hold because the system inevitably gets hijacked and this is what the other side has said forever. You wanted it and now you have it. You just can't take responsibility for it and seek to blame the other side in typical Alinskyist fashion.", "778" ], [ "Ah yes, mocking cucks clearly makes me alt-right even thought they annoy me.\n\nTell me more about myself oh wise oracle.\n\nI defend wrong-think. You won't shame me for that. The irony of you trying to defines you. As someone who self-identifies as an An-Cap you even making such a remark draws you intellect into question. If anything you are a perfect example argument for totalitarianism (not that this is my position but useful idiots like yourself sadly always lead society down such roads) for you do not even realize that you stand for positions that would inevitably just harm yourself.", "730" ], [ "This is what happens when you realize that politics is always a power struggle and that no one is intellectually pure and instead cares about being in power.\n\nThink Libs are any better? The past 100-200 years are a great example of how they aren't. When Liberals are in power they are not very sympathetic and approving of others living in authoritarian ways so much so that they will ban things globally and overthrow local systems of governments if not subvert them over decades.\n\nThe reality is people when in power are rarely ever consistent and stick to their beliefs and as such what matters most is to ensure that your side is in power. People who don't realize this always lose in the long term and it is the origin of this phenomenon.\n\nI don't like a totalitarian govt. but I sure know that it's less likely to become a reality if I am supreme leader vs. if some hyper auth happens to get the reigns of power.", "593" ], [ "He was ahead of his time. Soon most people will realize he was either right or have been sufficiently sedated, groomed and bred to be content bugmen pod people.\n\nHumanity is the quintessential example for the lion in the wild with no guarantees vs. in captivity. More and more people are beginning to wake up and realize what was taken from them. It only requires a very small critical mass something in the range if 1-3% to bring the system down. This is why those in control are so paranoid and obsessed with passing total control measures, they can feel the pulse of humanity returning and craving freedom from modern servitude.", "795" ], [ "It isn't a choice any more or less than liking anal is.\n\nYour past sexual experiences and continued focus is what drives it.\n\nI know it sounds a little extreme but give me 3 months with someone and a protocol to violate human rights and I'll turn a straight guy bi and a gay guy straight.\n\nForced orgasms, pain anti-conditioning, <PERSON>'s box conditioning, hypnosis, suggestion and similar are all going to be effective after a while.\n\nThe problem is conservatives acknowledge this but never approach deconditioning properly. Electroshock is useless unless you also give the positive reinforcement of a skilled hot female pegging practitioner producing regular orgasms. Meanwhile the advocates deny that society has any effect on conditioning people claiming that constant pro-gay sentiments since early childhood or all kinds of degenerate ultra hardcore pornography couldn't possibly have an effect.\n\nThis isn't to say it can change absolutely everyone but I'd put money on it that a lot of people who claim they were born gay or born straight could very much be shocked by how much they are actually influenced by experiences they have and their surroundings. This statement doesn't necessarily contradict that the people I might have conditioned were actually born straight or gay or at least with such a strong propensity to one side that only extreme totally abnormal events might have changed the outcome.", "390" ], [ "Pretty sure LibRights hero is actually compass unity.\n\nWSB taking down hedge funds that went to cry to <PERSON> the instant they started losing money for more regulation is so epic I don't see how anyone would pick anyone else.\n\nLiterally <PERSON> vs. <PERSON> and only reason they didn't slay <PERSON> is because he ran to the regulatory body exposing the system's corruption for anyone wishing to even glance that direction.", "220" ], [ "If the govt. loots you for 50k then it isn't hypocritical to get 1400 back.\n\nIf you could stealing up to 50k from the govt. would be entirely consistent with libertarian ideology. After all that's approx. what the govt. borrowed signing your name for the COVID package.\n\nSure if you can somehow end the govt. largess instead then by all means do that but since no individual actor usually has that much power the other option is entirely acceptable.", "651" ], [ "Cringe tier insult.\n\nEvery male who isn't getting at least 3 different 8s a day could benefit from more intercourse with attractive females. Ideally ones that fulfill their specific sexual fantasies.\n\nHow is this an insult? I literally know 6'6\" chads that pull girls by showing up being shoeless alcoholics who spend 80% of their time with less than a dollar to their name and when they had their life together they got laid once approximately once for every 100 wanks.\n\nGet better insults, you're probably not getting fucked the way you want to every time you want it either.", "238" ], [ "They just did electroshock therapy. That's not going to work. It just introduces a negative stimulus, one they might for all intents and purposes begin to get off on.\n\nYou can't change behaviour effectively with only negative impulses. You need to also have positive ones and change habits while removing the previous stimulus.\n\nAgain give me the camps and consenting adults and maybe 6 months with a team to build and effective curriculum.\n\nAs far as I know just about every conversion camp was full of prudes. You can't really turn perverts vanilla but you can feed them and condition them into other perversions.", "983" ], [ "Feel free to post the studies and the methodology. I'd be happy to have a look and find where they went wrong or didn't go far enough in my opinion. Could also just choose to disagree.\n\nMy guess is they went as far as making them fuck a prostitute thinking that would 'fix' them.\n\nThe same thing as 90% of people recommend to shy guys to suddenly make them super confident and lo and behold it doesn't work because it's simply the wrong and a tremendously stupid approach. You'd need to give them confidence to address the condition which would to be effective need to include a comprehensive approach that would include exercise, possible plastic surgery, extensive training in flirting, learning to dance, practice with both supportive teachers as well as real world etc. Basically 101 looks max + all the PUA and confidence self help stuff practiced consistently for 2 years vs. one fuck.", "289" ], [ "> Also your methods would not work. You can’t just take a gay person, have him practice and go through plastic surgery, train to flirt, dance and “practice” and have him turn straight.\n\nIt was referring to the idea that having sex with a prostitute would fix them by virtue of doing it the same way people think that having sex with a prostitute would fix a man with confidence issues. It doesn't address the root problem so it obviously doesn't work.\n\nIn the case of homosexual attractions there is often some trauma with the opposite sex or some exposure to perverse sexual habits early in ones life when one forms sexual habits.\n\nYou can continue to claim what the current 69 billion gender nonsense propagandists claim is true but it doesn't make me any more inclined to believe it is. Also if anything the article you linked would make me more inclined to believe my own position since it has some quite strong circumstancial evidence to indicate such therapies might work in general as opposed to only on that one individual. Personally would've left brain implants out of it.", "390" ], [ "Key things to note:\n\nHe claims for himself the right to oppress people for sake of a fiction \"But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force\" for the mere possibility that something may turn bad can happen \"for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.\"\n\nWhile there is some self-evident truth to this statement the way it is formulated it allows too much wiggle room to turn authoritarian. Furthermore who are you to rule over others? Wouldn't it simply be better to separate? At the end of the day oppressing intolerant people who just wish to be intolerant is worse than simply drawing a line in the sand and saying my side/your side, cross it and you die.\n\nAt the end of the day his early communist roots are still there. \nGulag the people who do not think like me for I am the majority.", "16" ], [ "But you have to hate every single person who has different opinions and organize to beat them to death in a mob. The leftist/statist can't understand your position because that is actually his.\n\nIf you do not wish to beat your ideological opponents to death then you are a traitor and your convictions weren't pure. If he's a lefty it's PANTIFA and if he's a run of the mill statists it's muh cops have the right to shoot you dead if you don't pay their puppet master's extortion fees.", "815" ], [ "You triggered by the fact that 'race realism' is real? That's not our issue. Go out and buy a pregnancy pillow to sooth the butthurt.\n\nIt explains why Asians do best, Jews do slightly better, whites sit in the upper middle area, Hispanics in the lower middle and blacks near the bottom. It's an uncomfortable truth but nonetheless it is one. Just like the fact that men and women are not equal but instead are very much different from one another and that these evolutionary differences will manifest in many ways. If you can think two steps ahead what initially seems like a horrible truth actually in many ways reveals itself to be a blessing, it is a gift that everyone isn't equal, if they were mediocrity would define us, this way most people have things they are good at and bad at and every few thousand people there are those that are truly brilliant. If it weren't for this there'd be no great music, no physics, no marvellous architecture, instead we'd all still be swinging off branches.\n\nIt's always amusing seeing people on the left mock religious folk for not believing in evolution and then seeing them act exactly as backwards without even realizing.\n\n---\n\nStating that the road to hell is paved with good intensions doesn't mean you're advocating people take it. Learn to understand nuance and perspective.\n\nMeanwhile bad people/things can create either by intension or by chance something positive. This shouldn't be something beyond even a leftist's grasp. Heaps of backwards people have contributed immeasurably to human progress.", "1020" ], [ "Preventing degenerates from being degenerate is still tyranny.\n\nWhen there is no over-arching govt. that forces people to all live under the same roof this stops being a problem since people can begin compartmentalizing the ill effects of detrimental behavior. The reality is most people are to some degree or another in some area or another of their lives degenerate. Whether you're a womanizer, like gaming, enjoy drinking, have a smoke, like a pizza before bed etc. etc. etc.\n\nVoluntarism allows people to associate or disassociate. Don't like degenerates? Form a community with puritans. Like degeneracy? Move to some place where daily participation in orgies is expected. This would be far more likely to create a society where both sides are happy and around people with shared values and significantly less likely to be forced to deal with people with polar opposite values.", "647" ], [ "The average American is close to a 1%er. I believe in 2016 the cutoff for the 1% globally was US$ 32,000/year.\n\nWhile there has been some divergence between productivity gains and real income gains since the end of the gold standard they aren't anywhere near what people often pretend. Most of the the 'stagnant income' stats come from using household income not per capita. Household have been shrinking.\n\nThat the govt. printin money masked the downturn is definitely the case. Exactly how much is hard to say and generally assuming it would cause a decade of negative economic growth is unrealistic.\n\nUnemployment figures are one of the greatest scams in govt. history. U6 is what should be used and not U3 which is used. Of course that makes politicans look bad and would also call into question many social programs whos beneficiaries are guaranteed votes for big govt politicians so they aren't interested in this.\n\n > Have living standards for the average American been falling, or not?\n\n<PERSON> did a good segment on this. Poverty these days is what luxury was half a century ago. These days you can have a 2 bedroom house, central air conditioning, TV, phone, internet and 2 cars and be in poverty. That very same standard in the 70s would've made you middle class. The cost of living in cities is significantly higher but that is a choice you make. Pretending housing is unaffordable because a 4 bedroom house in some metropolitan area is 2 million is plainly dishonest. A tiny house (a specific type of house that is rather portable) and a plot of land is something you can have for 30,000 (you'd have to do the work but you'd have acres and a decent place albeit small).", "954" ], [ "That's not correct. Stuff has quite a bit to do with human happiness until the point where you can afford pretty much everything you might reasonably want. In the US this point is somewhere around 75,000.\n\nIf you look at happiness by nation there also seems to be a fairly strong correlation with wealth and happiness. I do recall some theorized genetic correlation with Nordic people being the best off but don't recall it exactly and am not sure if it isn't a by product of the economic aspect.\n\nHonestly if you're in Silicon Valley it's your fault. You aren't unmarriagable without 10 million but finding someone there would be hilariously hard unless you're into leftist landwhales.", "580" ], [ "The arguments against intellectual property are fairly simple and could be summed up as:\n\n 1. Ideas are non-competitive. If you have and idea and someone else copies this idea you do not lose an idea. This is different to real property which is competitive, if you take my bike I no longer have one.\n\n 2. Intellectual property and property rights are inherently self-contradictory. Intellectual property requires you to undermine property rights since it demands that you can dictate what others do with their property.\n\n 3. Intellectual property undermines the very foundation of self-ownership and the idea of liberty for it necessitates that you dictate what others can do with themselves. The best example of this is the reality that if you're walking and singing some song to yourself you can be convicted.\n\nIntellectual property is a figment of the state whereby it abuses its monopoly on force to harm all but one to favour one. Where taxation is extortion intellectual property is thought police and the state telling you what you can do with your mind and body.\n\nSomething which is very similar in practice but completely different in principle which would satisfy many of the same desires are trade secrets. Here it is the company/people's job to keep something secret.", "48" ], [ "I get what you're saying which is that it is a needless concession to make and a false one. I would broadly agree on this but that also misses the point.\n\nYour argument is that we should have liberty because it provides safety. That is not an argument for liberty but one for safety. In fact you arguing in that way could just as well and arguably more so be considered playing their game and legitimizing it.\n\nMeanwhile the other argument made here which is that liberty should come before safety which is what OP is making is the one that counts. This is an argument for liberty based on liberty.\n\nConvincing a bunch of people who prioritize safety to vote for liberty on some issue at some point in time because it provides safety is infinitely less valuable than convincing them that liberty should be a higher prority than safety always and that a society that values safety above liberty is bound to end up absolutely totalitarian by design.\n\nIt will very likely be less safe in the end but let's steel man that argument and pretend they manage perfect padded rooms that truly are as safe as conceivable, even then it is a dystopia. Now instead of fighting to debunk one instance playing their game you've debunked that entire notion in its entirety even in a hypothetical universe that works in their favour where they make the perfect safety tools and those in power aren't corrupted by ulterior motives all whilst playing your game.\n\nYes, I do believe in Liberty. Yes, I do believe in the right to freedom of expression, the right to self-defense and the right to your own body even if it means children will die. I wouldn't ban speech because someone killed themselves over some insults, I wouldn't ban guns because someone shot up a school and I wouldn't ban drugs because some kid will inevitably overdose. The 'right' (in as loose a way as possible) conceding the safety argument is why it has lost continually since the 30s. I won't concede those principles.", "651" ], [ "By this logic everyone is a slave of the govt. and the corporations. Unironically. around 10% of your caloric intake goes into making and maintaining you. All this stuff will inevitably at some point go over govt. roads and be handled by some corporation. By their backwards 'logic' you are now actual property of the govt. and those corporations. Not just that but it's pretty hard to escape other govts. as well given how much trade there is. so you're likely a slave to all govts. even North Korea's since they export a bunch of coal to China and I doubt a single person outside of the most isolated tribes hasn't at some point handled some cheap Chinese consumer product.", "848" ], [ "Please SJWs are going to wear the burka soon to protect themselves from 'the male gaze' and landwhales turn into cat ladies not dog people.\n\nOn a more serious note they are spineless and would bend over for Islam immediately. When the first few end up imprisoned for their temper tantrums and some beheaded the rest would immediately cuck. They need a safespace to deal with words, they can't handle fists and most definitely can't handle drawn sabres.", "972" ], [ "Some of these questions are poorly worded/thoughtout.\n\n30% longer isn't helpful. 30% on 10 minutes is fine. 30% on 90 minutes is not. Furthermore can't the employees simply leave? I guess what would be the main sticking point is the bribery since people can choose to work in poor conditions.\n\nThe notion that the store would still be there after multiple boycotts pretty much ignores how boycotts work. There is also no reference to simply calling in a rights enforcement agency to handle the issue.", "616" ], [ "Meanwhile California has the third lowest IQ in the nation and the Mid-Western states are pretty much on par with the East Coast.\n\nI wonder how the libtards would react when they hear Utah & Idaho which I'm sure they couldn't stop making jokes about are not only above the average IQ but have higher average IQs than New York, Delaware, Maryland & Rhode Island.", "438" ], [ "Don't have to be superior to take advantage of a group that is otherwise too altruistic.\n\nIf we theorize one group is 10x stronger and 10x smarter and cannot lie and will never say something unless they are certain it is true. Then it's very easy for the group that is literally 1/10th as strong and smart to entirely subjugate and enslave the stronger group simply by stating \"I am stronger and smarter than you and it is in your benefit to let me rule and extract productivity from you and if you try to resist we will be stronger anyway\".\n\nCunning and questionable morals by group B in that case took advantage of group A's presumption of goodness.", "230" ], [ "They were denied a life worth living by their degenerate parents and decayed society around them.\n\nThey are as much victims as perpetrators. Only when we realize this I think we can truly address the issue. They always project. Who hurt you is a Freudian slip. They were deeply hurt and their abusers told them it was 'the evil right-wingers' that did this to them when in fact it was precisely those authority figures lying to them that were responsible.", "851" ], [ "Feel free to compare those with pretty much any other empires and you'll find that the other ones were morally inferior.\n\nCrusades were defensive wars against Ottoman aggression and are literally outdone by an order of magnitude by Ottoman raiding. Church infighting isn't the only time in history that religious sects have disagreed, Sunni and Shia. Atlantic slave trade is as much the African tribes slave trade. The Atlantic slave trade is by comparison to the arab slave trade very small and was significantly less brutal, the arabs literally chopped their slaves dicks and balls off for example, whites whipped unruly slaves.\n\nEast Indies companies are a significantly less brutal version of what the Mongols did. One could argue China was superior here because they set out to explore the world, came back thinking it was all worthless and scuttled their fleet. At the same time the whole white man's burden aspect is noble, at the very least in spirit, even if you find it misguided or the consequences might at times not been optimal.", "680" ], [ "Probably posted a Nazi pepe.\n\nMeanwhile leftie subs are fine to post literal cold war era and cultural revolution era posters.\n\nEither allow free speech or be against glorification of murder but Reddit clearly isn't.\n\nI'd even guess 90% was edgy humor whereas almost all the leftie Stalinists or Maoist deepthroating is sincere.", "126" ], [ "What dream world do you live in?\n\nHave you checked politics at all. They've been deepthroating <PERSON> and twat munching <PERSON> got months.\n\nMaybe 0.13% and even that's a stretch given that the only based liblefts are on PCM and even here it's at best 50-50 on a good day whether you get a cringe soyboy or liblefts that thinks guns are in fact s necessity and the govt. imprisoning the entire country means it could time to consider using them against tyranny and all.", "725" ], [ "Femicide is fake. Murder is murder.\n\nAlso I'd bet that the majority of the victims of murder in your country are in fact men but neither you, society, the media or anyone cares because we don't actually live in a patriarchy but live in a gynocracy where men's lives matter so little they make up terms to show how mistreated women are when men are murdered at a rate of 200 to 300% the rate women are.", "878" ], [ "Yes yes I'm also a fan of that one. Especially since it's too much fun to use against lefties that think guns kill people.\n\nWhat makes you a slave historically? Being disbarred the right to bear weapons. Why? In the end if there is true resentment in the people and they are armed no ruler or tyrant can raise an army of sufficient size to suppress them.\n\nIf socialism was assault rifles (actual ones with a fun switch and under barrel new years celebratory addition) and military/paramilitary style training for all we basically be shoulder to shoulder for more of our time than apart tankie.", "180" ], [ "To be fair considering <PERSON> has made it this far and his socio-economic standing a more realistic age of death for him is probably 84-87.\n\nLife expectancy includes those that have already passed away before you're age. For men from that era it's something like half have died by the late 60s. Therefore if you're still alive you will likely make it past the life expectancy.", "258" ], [ "And other murders are love murders?\n\nMurder is pretty much the most hateful thing you can do.\n\nMen don't just kill women for having vaginas either. Murdering your wife because she slept with someone else isn't actually \"I hate women so I will kill her\". It's a crime of passion and in the West even has reduced sentences in some countries it's closer to \"I am so devastated by what you did and how you betrayed me even though I love you so much the betrayal made me lose control and murder\". This isn't an endorsement.\n\nHate crimes serve no purpose but to make distinctions between people and this is usually used to gain power. In this case it gives women a special protected status over men. Furthermore if you think hate crimes are legitimate then by extension you must necessarily believe in some degree of thought crime which is a dangerous road and one any sincere Lib should know to avoid.", "528" ], [ "> because women are too afraid of leaving their house past 10 pm\n\nYeah women are more fearful. Time and again this is just them being afraid. If humans were rational then men would be the ones afraid to leave the house because they tend to be the victims of something like 80% of violent crime. Just men aren't afraid because society and biology don't allow it.\n\n > Own a woman\n\nPlease feel free to deal with my girlfriend who said she wanted an open relationship then went crazy when I slept with someone and has hit me on multiple occasions. Granted if I hit her it would cause more damage but since I have no intention it doesn't change the fact that it's domestic violence and abuse. Oh and guess what like all women she assumes she's the victim and still won't believe the majority of domestic violence is actually reciprocal and where it isn't majority female violence on men. To borrow a dangerous phrase but it is way too fitting: \"Women cry out in pain as they strike you.\"\n\n > Women defenseless\n\nHonestly most modern people are defenseless. An average <PERSON> against a hardened thug is about as fair as little 100lbs tiny girl vs. me. Only real solution is to give the good guys guns.\n\n > Raped 18x and then dismembered\n\nYeah that sounds like drug cartels. You think those guys would politely ask a man? Please they'd rape him just the same but with objects and then dismember him too.\n\nBut feel free to refer give the good guys guns comments.\n\nShe'd still be dead but with a micro uzi she would have died with dignity and taken some of them down with her.\n\nFor the remainder I assume they don't have stats but I'm guessing police neglect of assault is probably just as high if not higher and I'd bet the drug/gang related deaths and violence also primarily affect male victims.\n\nIronically people don't realize that Femicide is just benevolent sexism and that somehow makes society equal. Just like diversity quotas that discriminate against Asians and whites are more justice than no such system.\n\nHow's your current president? He actually legit and anti-corruption or just using massive hatred of gangs as a way to get in as a commie?", "490" ], [ "NRA has been a 'sensible gun control organization' in disguise basically since it's inception. They voted for the 30s tax stamp & more which started it all and also the 68 regulations.\n\nGoA needs more support.\n\nI swear we need legislation that doesn't just guarantee gun rights but punishes, harshly and severely gun restrictions or the incitement of gun restrictions. Wish the founding fathers would've thought to add this or at least someone thought to Amend it.\n\nRR was also a stooge. Perfect example of 'the establishment right' giving their base (overhwelmingly AuthRight) a faux 'right-wing populist' who actually passes shit that harms them and is against their principles. Gun rights in CA are an example but so is the legalization of 3 million illegals that basically turned Cali blue for good after he was gone. Textbook example of controlled opposition.", "225" ], [ "Actually genocide is a right-wing concept so the USSR & Maoist China were just another example of right-wingers committing genocide. The left believes in unity, peace and utopia so if you aren't currently seeing unicorns you can be sure that it's actually right-wingers fault somehow.\n\nSounds like youre from politics.\n\nSJWs are precisely the kind of maniacs from the left that do attempt to seize power in a real revolution as they are currently doing in the drawn out 'cultural revolution' since the typical revolutions in Western coutries failed thus the approach was changed to that of the long march through the institutions. As such they are the lefts trained foot soldiers. Revolution in a stable country where the average person is comfortable and feels like their life is nice and nothing much is wrong is destined to fail and end in the revolutionaries being locked up. So first you must create misery, discontent, suffering and fracture society. Only then do you stand a chance that any revolution might be successful. This is exactly what the left has been doing on every front while keeping up the facade of trying to 'help the average guy' although that facade has slipped as the foot soldiers become sloppy. Leftism has always been an ideology led by discontent elites SJWs are precisely like <PERSON>, rich, living off daddies/mommies money, while writing poetry and never once having actually labored or lived within the means of a poor person. That is assuming there isn't a <PERSON> who gets to power first and sends them off to the gulags for being degenerates.", "55" ], [ "Not that I'm in favour of war in Syria but I believe stripping oxygen from the air is one of the ways a chemical weapon can work.\n\nAt least I know that in warfare this is one of the ways a flame thrower is used to clear out bunkers. The flames use up all the oxygen so the people come rushing out even if they technically aren't at risk of being hit by the flames.", "864" ], [ "Not sure. I vaguely recall some chemicals possibly used in weapons mentioning this kind of effect but I could be misremembering this or possibly it was just something people researched. I also know that there are chemicals that effectively 'choke' people by binding to hemoglobin of which carbon monoxide is one. These I assume would produce fairly similar symptoms to suffocation in behavior and appearance. Other toxic compounds work by interfering with oxygen elsewhere in the metabolism although I don't know if that would produce similar effects (and presume in many cases it wouldn't).\n\n'All these people died randomly and suddenly of a lack of oxygen' doesn't make you think 'natural causes' or 'common warfare'. People don't just randomly drop dead because of lack of oxygen in every day life. It makes you think something specific to cause a lack of oxygen occurred. Whether that is indeed some chemical weapon is another issue.\n\nIt could be a multitude of things a fire, something like CO/CO2 being vented, a doctor that doesn't know what he's talking (which is probably the case since dust in the air doesn't make oxygen disappear and if it's particulate buildup in the lungs that's something very different although it probably could result in people 'choking') about etc. This report doesn't put this controversy to rest which I'm guessing a lot of people might false think.", "288" ], [ "You have your life. If you don't like it or yourself then change.\n\nChange isn't always easy and in many cases will be hard and make you uncomfortable but that doesn't mean you shouldn't invest the effort if you do not like who and what you are.\n\nIt appears as though you aren't happy with your personality so it is up to you to change that.\n\nStart with something small e.g.: striking up a short conversation with 1 stranger a day, if you must within the safety of a previously existing interaction. Work from there.\n\nIf you're happy with yourself then stop bitching.", "4" ], [ "Welcome to the regressive left.\n\nTearing down all liberty in the name of Stalinist control of speech and the narrative.\n\nGet in there and fight. Snowflakes can't handle being challenged with logic or facts. Challenge them and then let them display for all to see how authoritarian and intolerant they are.\n\nIf they kick you out make a different community and make sure you don't tolerate the SJWs and kindly tell them to f*ck off and hang in their regressive circle jerk.", "965" ], [ "It's all there. If you can't piece it together that's really you problem whether it be because you do not want to hear it or because you lack reading comprehension neither of which are my problem or things I can change.\n\nIf you need to go to the original thread and read the first and second comment after having read the third and it should be more than clear.\n\nThe primary premise is pretty simple:\n\nGenetic matters much more than people are normally willing to accept and the very first link namely the one to IQ heritability is enough to prove that point beyond any shadow of a doubt.\n\nThere are secondary ones in there as well:\n\n - While races are by no mean ideal groups (genetic sequencing once we've figured out all or 90% of the genes would be what you'd want) they act as proxies for populations that have up until recent history been largely separated and thus ended up with variation (no the more difference within than between isn't an argument, this holds for pretty much anything and just a minor variation is enough to have significant effects). The evidence that not only did this happen but it is possible is right there with hair, skin colour and for red heads propagation of a 'broken' melanin producing system, adaptation to disease, digit ratios between nations which are so significant that they bridge the gender gap etc.\n\n - When this same argument is made regarding something that isn't culturally unacceptable to make there is much less outrage, if any at all except from ideologues but the 'common person' sees it for what it is. The example given is the difference between strength and height between men and women which is also genetic. These intelligence differences between men and women also exist especially near the peaks because men's IQ bell curves tend to be wider and if you then say something aking to men contribute more to societies advancement or men are smarter or men produce more geniuses you then get significantly more outrage than height or strength but less than mentioning differences between groups.\n\n - The left has a vested interest in denying this as evidence by history and the banning of any discussion whether true or not disproving it in the USSR and the massive shaming of people even daring to touch the subject in the West. The reasons are very likely that it would undermine their narrative of oppression.", "177" ], [ "I wouldn't rule out a false flag, rebels using them but messing up, a depot of weapons being accidentally hit, some chemical leak or something akin to this.\n\nThe reporter reporting such observations in my opinion makes something to do with chemicals more not less probable. The sand storm story given is also very questionable, I'm sure they're common there and people don't normally 'die of lack of oxygen' when they come around. Chemicals heavier than air pooling in trenches or in this case basements and tunnels is also something that would at least happen with some such weapons.\n\nThis observation is again separate from whether starting the 3rd war in the Middle East over something like this is a good idea which it obviously isn't.", "199" ], [ "There shouldn't be a tax in general.\n\nHaving such an entity would mean that there are likely rulers and people being ruled over.\n\nWant roads? Buy a subscription, build some yourself or pool money with people to build one.\n\nWant a police force? Hire a firm, build a police force and offer its services on the market or pool money with people to fund one.\n\netc.\n\nThat would eliminate coercion both in the form of somene else telling you what you must do with you money but also someone else charging you fees for things you do not use.\n\nNonetheless there would be no prohibition on somoene e.g.: forming a private city where everything is covered for the fee of X real money a month or something akin to this. Think of it as renting with utilities but with everything actually included.", "786" ], [ "> who still believe in that\n\nEver believed in that. FTFY*.\n\nThey believed in free speech for their ideas while they weren't in power. That isn't being pro free speech it's being pro your side. Being pro free speech would then be maintaining that stance when you are in power which obviously almost none of them did thereby revealing themselves for what they were. People who only ever cared about winning and had no principles. You see further evidence in the fact that the places that are most left i.e.: universities tend to be the most hostile to freedom of speech.", "30" ], [ "> So what you’re saying is that you buy a shitton of land, develop it with all necessities, find a way to get it tax free from the government, make everyone self-sustaining within that new city, and charge the new residents a monthly fee to live there that includes the police force and utilities?\n\nCorrect.\n\n > And I assume the students will be placed in a private school.\n\nA multitude of learning options would be available. My guess is 'school' as we know it and think of it will be completely obsolete. Instead they'll have video lectures with weekly packages with materials delivered or even in person experiences in VR which saves even those costs. The only people I imagine still needing 'school' would be the severely mentally handicapped and then only for them to become as self-sufficient as their disability might allow.\n\n > In any violation, will they still adhere to state laws if it was going to be realistic? Or will all laws just be coded in a contract and if they break a rule, they get a fine that will be taken to state court?\n\nIf you choose to move to such a private city there will be a contract which would likely specify which rights enforcement agencies you could contract with and under what conditions you are in the city. Most justice wouldn't be retributive but compensatory so think more fines but in the actual amount of the damages and less jail time.\n\nIf you do not like their conditions then look to either another such city with conditions you like, completely open conditions for e.g.: rights enforcement agencies or simply form your own community somewhere where you define that everyone can do what they want on their own property so long as they do not harm anyone and any property held in collective/trust will follow the laws of the closest adjacent property.", "1013" ], [ "99% vs. 100% makes no difference. Even 90% vs. 10% makes no difference. I would say the first is a fair approximation of the amount of influence the different narratives currently have and the 90% figure would be a fair approximation of the amount of airtime given to regressive topics or ones related to them and the old talking points.\n\nWhatever faction there is it is so irrelevant and small that it has no control whatsoever.\n\n > It feels like - dare I say it - indoctrination\n\nIt's always been that way. Statists specifically engineered 'education' to have that effect. When's the last time you heard something hyper critical of the state or taxes which fund it in education? When's the last time you heard and argument in public education that the state should be disarmed since it has proven beyond any shadow of doubt that it can't be trusted with arms given the quarter billion dead in a century?\n\n > sex before marriage in my introduction to anatomy class in my christian high school felt like indoctrination\n\nGenerally speaking though sex before marriage brings a lot of baggage with it and the conservatives were right that it damages the next generation. Two generations of 'sexual liberation' and the West is on life support. I don't like to say it since I consider myself more degenerate than conservative (as far as knowing some counter stats and their arguments might qualify) but they were right.\n\nThey were also spot on with the whole giving the left gay marriage (an issue of Statism and people should've been able to make their own churches where gay couples get married but they didn't and given the 1st Amendment they would've and should've been free to do so) leading to complete lunacy with it now being 'you will bake the cake or else' & 'you will kiss <PERSON> or you're a bigot' gender is just imaginary it doesn't matter that he has a dick he can also get his period. Kind of a shame since addressing this issue from a common sense position was something that should've been done and doing so would've been an actual example of progress.\n\nIt might very well have been a case of takes one to know one although personally I just think it was conservative public figures feeling the hatred of the left since before anyone else and your average person is only just beginning to understand it with the hatred of white people the left is beginning to champion at the moment.", "68" ], [ "Male birth control or birth control in general?\n\nI think there are issues to using hormonal birth control and patients should in their own interest seek out non-hormonal birth control both male and female.\n\nThere are several options that don't use hormones out there so I would always use those.\n\n*Especially if they come out with a male pill I would be extremely cautious and steer clear the first decade or so to see what the long term effect are. Hopefully there are none but possibly it might mess with your endocrine system or something else.*", "343" ], [ "Was a technicality and wouldn't want the praise going to it.\n\nThat is nice to see and as I had mentioned Australia does have some protections in place that make it more resilient than the West however it is beginning to show similar symptoms.\n\nSome of the things Australia has done to protect itself go a long way and include:\n\n - strict immigration policies.\n\n - taking very few refugees.\n\n - maintaining a low national debt (although it is growing worryingly fast).\n\n - preventing the sale of 'harmful' debt. A while back I believe Australia sold some infrastructure to Chinese investors but deemed this a move against its own interest and bought it back.\n\nAustralia is definitely very resource wealthy and has a very healthy economy so this definitely strengthens it. You've also maintained a fairly high birth rate so that would also draw out a potential demographic cliff.\n\nKeep voting that way and pressure the govt. to get rid of the debt, have lots of kids and you might be able to maintain such a system for 40 more years.", "79" ], [ "Yes it is entirely possible that 90% of board members are men. Also politicians and that it doesn't come down to discrimination.\n\nSimply looking at the data of sex by work field should make it clear that it isn't uncommon to have fields that are 90% / 10%. (_URL_0_)\n\nThen there is the fact that men tend to spread further from the mean than women. So once you get to very high IQ regions the ratio of men to women increases significantly (this also helps explain STEM breakdowns) even though the average man and woman tend to be almost the same. (_URL_4_ first link that came up is Breitbart but from skimreading it they seem to explain the phenomena sufficiently but here's another study that shows a similar difference in standard deviation _URL_1_)\n\nIn regards to the drive factor there are two things at play. Historically men have had far more pressure to succeed as evidenced by estimates saying about 80% of women managed to reproduce historically but only around 40% with this ratio going from 2:1 to figures as high as 17:1 in times of hardship. (_URL_3_ & _URL_5_). Accumulating resources and attaining a position of power is a legitimate mating strategy for men and it is less effective for women. Almost all women want to date a guy who makes more money than them (stuff like this _URL_2_).\n\nFinally there is the effect that selection has. If you run people through an arbitrary selection process multiple times you tend to amplify the norm. So for example a field that is 7M/3W if you pick multiple times you tend to become more likely to have a man as the final choice in a ratio higher than 70%. Sadly I am having trouble digging the link up but it was a rather interesting read. Feel free to discount this point or if you do find such a link let me know.", "867" ], [ "Religion? No. I don't have a sky daddy.\n\nI just find it baffling that people will happily swallow hormone treatments when there are other options available that don't mess with your system.\n\nI also find it pretty crazy to sterilize yourself. If it were any other procedure you'd be mocked as a sado-masochist loon. *To be fair I understand the scope of the procedure is tiny and with modern medical advancements it is reversible in 20-70% cases but the impact is still very significant. But chemical sterilization is also a tiny procedure.*\n\nI can't imagine that something like this wouldn't be seen as insane if the West hadn't taken a giant cultural Marxism -having kids is evil, you owe it to the world to die out- suppository. I mean the majority of the necessary costs associated with children are covered by the state anyways.", "772" ], [ "I think the issue is that the rest of society finds the notion that a priest must commit to being celibate cruel and is essentially just breeding abusers.\n\nIf a person doesn't get any sexual relief their entire life they might be a lot more inclined to do something awry to fulfill the desire that has been building.\n\nThe best way to make the general public more sympathetic would be to highlight the rate of abuse of priests vs. the general populous. On first glance it seems to be on par:\n\n_URL_0_", "364" ], [ "I don't really bring all that many causes up. Just call out feminist brainwashing.\n\nI enjoy watching people who claim to be open human beings squirm when they have to deal with someone stating opinions they don't like hearing.\n\nHad friends who believe in all the SJW nonsense threaten to forcefully remove me from their property for questioning their NARRATIVE^TM. Guess they weren't really for 'no borders'. You don't get hypocrisy like that for free. I used to always play the devil's advocate anyways but this time around people cannot handle me doing it which makes it so much more amusing.", "763" ], [ "Let me just hop on a plane to give a guy a warm meal?\n\nI donate to orphans, widows, the elderly and disabled and I also sponsor children through school and university. I don't think I need any praise for it so I don't advertise it however if you insist on bringing it up...\n\nI'd buy them all a warm dinner as I tend to do when I encounter homeless people at night in a big city on what appears to be a cold damp evening, used to bum a cigarette in exchange since it was more communal and have a chat. Sometimes I only spare US$ 2 but even the same man on different days isn't his own equal.", "974" ], [ "A lot of ~~progressive~~regressive types seem to be all too happy to embrace guilty until proven innocent. Sadly our society failed to instill in them the respect for and understanding of the importance of the presumption of innocence.\n\nIt is almost as though they forgot that one of the strongest arguments against the death penalty which was one of their rally calls of old was specifically this. How can we in good conscience sentence people to death when we know that people are falsely sentenced for crimes they did not commit. If you cannot be certain you should always err on the side of caution.\n\nGood on you for powering through a terrible life experience and keeping your objectivity and humanity through it.", "178" ], [ "I'd say this is a case of correlation not causation.\n\nIf you're an MRA and on Reddit you're likely to be a younger man living in a developed country. Developed countries tend to be more secularized and in turn people in more developed countries tend to be less religious especially if they grew up in their already secularized societies.\n\nI'd also presume that people who are MRAs or understand/agree with the arguments are more likely to ignore the narrative and look at actual data/search for deeper truths and such a person would be more likely to become an agnostic/atheist than a theist and more likely to become an MRA than a feminist/normie.", "126" ], [ "A bunch of atheists are nu-age progressives.\n\nThey don't actually believe in reason they were simply taught that god is wrong and mindlessly accepted this along with a whole bunch of other nonsense.\n\nMost of them wouldn't even know that the notion of god is essentially unfalsifiable and dismissed on that account. This of course doesn't mean god exists it simply means that proving god doesn't exist is (in all likelihood at least given our current means and understanding) impossible.\n\nGenerally any unfalsifiable assertion is immediately thrown into the bin of pseudo-science. This is the basis of science. Concern with things that can be proven or disproven, anything else is philosophy.", "844" ], [ "In regard to vasectomies I founded this view back when I believed we should all not have children because the carbon output of a person in the West will destroy the planet. I don't believe in self-mutilation to heal. Self-mutilation for sexual pleasure I'm all fine with. I don't like people redefining things. There is not medical necessity to impair that otherwise functional human being. Any doctor that refuses to perform such an action is within his rights to and adhering to his oath.\n\nI don't think my criticism of the pill is paranoid or misinformed. Check out the side effects and every single woman I know who was taking the pill has swapped to an IUD due to side effects ranging from lack of sex drive to weight gain to acne etc. Sure it is only like 5 women but 5/5 is still some pretty decent anecdotal evidence and the reality is the majority of women experience some side effect.", "772" ], [ "I do not. Where I currently live homelessness is nearly non-existent because there is no welfare state and you need to work for food. Also the standard of what constitutes a home here is pretty rudimentary and everyone has extended families.\n\nI do give them food and I have given someone sleeping rough my jacket.\n\nI should though. I hope that when I get back to the West I help someone get back on track. I know I'll have to overcome some apprehension but I'd hope I rise to the occasion. If only by sheer number of opportunities.", "681" ], [ "This would be the right place.\n\nMen and women who think men and boys are getting a rough deal are more than welcome here.\n\nI think as a woman you have a unique position where you might be able to reach some people who dismiss other people based on nothing more than genitalia. Since you got yourself out of feminist misinformation you probably have just the tools to help others see things for what they are.", "181" ], [ "Why is it worse to sexually mutilate girls than boys?\n\nJust draw it back to this fundamental element.\n\nHuman beings should have a right to genital integrity. We shouldn't be cutting stuff off someone before they can consent. If they are adults and want to undergo FGM or circumcision then that is their choice. Whether they might find a doctor willing to perform such surgery is another issue onto itself.", "451" ], [ "He wears one every time he is out in public. The guy has security escorts almost everywhere. He isn't playing. He genuinely risks his life to try and save the West.\n\nRead his Wiki. The man has scheduled visits with his wife 1-2 times a week for security reasons.\n\nReminds you that while we fight a meme war some heroes actually stand on the front lines.", "920" ], [ "Yes I am well aware of that but if grievous errors in drafting occur you amend or repeal that law.\n\nThere should also be a lot of review before any law is ever signed into law to try and prevent such mistakes.\n\nSomething like this really shouldn't slip through the cracks (unless it was always intended to do so). This is what I am alluding to. Something like the Duluth model is a similar example where something clearly immoral is used by the govt. although that is police practice and not a law.", "733" ], [ "I mean if everybody has their own personal sex robots you could technically end the spread of HIV/AIDS with that.\n\nJust saying...\n\nI mean disregarding how obtuse the comment is and that it equates solving diseases with creating a sexbot. However it's funny that this would give men a sex toy and look at how feminists lose their shit. Imagine if men had acted similarly about vibrators or dildos? It'd have been misogyny.", "278" ], [ "That's why I use libtard. Separate them from actual liberals.\n\nThe political left has largely abandoned actual liberal values and been abandoned by people who actually support liberal values but there are bound to still be millions.\n\n - A libtard might argue that letting a mob beat/kill someone who said something that hurt a million peoples' feelings is just and right.\n\n - A liberal would argue that if you had to you should kill all one million of those trying to beat/kill this man for speaking his mind. Anything else wouldn't be just.", "965" ], [ "I find that regressives are a segment in libtards. Specifically the SJW we must separate the races again so that the races may be equal kind.\n\nLibtards also include champagne socialists, the people who claim to be about the science but then show themselves to have little to no understanding of it etc.\n\nThen again obviously there isn't any standard and both terms do just fine. My experience is probably also influenced by the fact that I encounter a lot of anti-SJW content and regressive is the label that that community tends to use to describe these people.", "285" ], [ "This isn't entirely accurate.\n\nIt actually wishes to kill gay rights, the pagans and the taoists. Unbelievers (godless people) or polytheists cannot be forgiven. Christians and Jews are people of the book and can convert or must pay a tax for protection.\n\nPacifism is also tolerated but you are seen as a lesser to your peers and should or in some cases must finance someone else's conquest.\n\nI assume in this case taoism is meant to symbolize general Eastern philosophy and quite a few people follow it. Think it is about 1.1-1.3 billion people who in East Asia do not believe in a god but believe in some form of philosophy/folk religion/etc.", "129" ], [ "You can message the moderators to contest your ban.\n\nI've been banned twice I believe. The first time I merely messaged them to make my case and I was unbanned and the second time I was unbanned before I had noticed that I was banned.\n\nI've explained Marxism on this forum and even highlighted how in some cases it isn't entirely false as well as had /r/DebateCommunism in my history and that never caused any issues. Not that I am a Marxist or a Communist but I try to be fair to things and old-school Marxism is so much better than neo-Marxism and I thought I might talk to some Communists and debate them (not that that lasted long before I was banned over there and never unbanned).", "621" ], [ "I mean Snopes did a satisfactory job of debunking this, they usually do alright on conspiracy theory stuff since they come up with false. They're rather awful when it isn't a yes no issue and let their own bias seep in. For example when <PERSON> says something it is mostly true whilst when <PERSON> says the same thing it is mostly false.\n\nThis is just some rumour. If anything it distracts from actual issues such as Vault 7 and how the CIA is literally hacking and illegally collecting information on just about everyone.", "969" ], [ "Seems like we've already hit that point where a bullshit degree is worth less than no degree.\n\nMaybe get a proper degree. In a subject that is actually hard. Where you contribute to the rest of society.\n\nAlso how are those 3 degrees. I see none. Studying for a Masters in Germany (in Germany they used to use a Diplom system so it could be that he has passed the point where he has a Bachelors). Even if I grant both of these things he only has a BA from Germany & a Hon. BA from Toronto and is still working on his 'third' degree although that degree would essentially replace his first BA.\n\nI mean if you have a Doctorate you don't go on and claim you have three degrees (or you'd have to be a pretty dishonest person) since you would often get a BA, then a Masters and then a Dr. but it would sound like you're claiming to be a Dr. Dr. Dr. which is rather rare.\n\n---\n\n*Edited a bit for accuracy.*", "907" ], [ "But that is exactly the aim of these policies.\n\nDemocrats want and need their voting plantation. Welfare policies have devastated black communities and anyone who looks at the numbers can see this but no one on the democratic party who genuinely had a shot (at least that I know of) proposed rolling these back and maybe over 3-10 years cancelling them entirely.\n\nLefties and race baiters would be out of a job if black people weren't being kept down by their rhetoric, racist policies and the devastation of the black family due to welfare.\n\n<PERSON> has some great segments on this.", "612" ], [ "They're just contrails... _URL_0_\n\nPlanes flying through the sky are essentially (at least on a very small scale) cloud seeding. Water droplets can't form unless they have a surface that isn't water to stick to often times the air is moist enough to form little water droplets but they lack some sort of dirt or other tiny particles to form into a drop. Exhaust fume impurities provide this.\n\nDrops as in the rain drops kind can't condense out of the air until they are about the size of a small drop of water without some sort of 'particle to help'. It is called nucleation. _URL_1_", "982" ], [ "Yep, wouldn't even unban when I specifically made the point that I am there for discussion.\n\nI mean if you had a good case to make on a forum that is meant for debate why would you ban someone. You'd 'convert' me. It's literally myself vs. hundreds of communists. You'd think they'd have more faith in their own community.\n\nI think the mods hated that I knew old <PERSON> wouldn't be happy with where snowflakes have taken his stuff and completely turned it on his head. They were probably butthurt. A filthy capitalist pig knowing their own Marxist garbage better than they do seems like it might sting.\n\nAlso lots of no-true communism fallacies. In the sub-Reddits defense I believe two people did actually engage in discussion and at least said that Cuba, the USSR & Maoist China were awful although I suspect these weren't 'true believers' since the guy lamented that every far left sub has trigger happy mods.", "728" ], [ "Or economics. Also comes to mind.\n\nThat way you get a lot of exposure to different fields and Germany in particular has an entire school of economic thought dedicated to 'almost socialist but not quite there yet' economics.\n\n3 Buzzwords in a single paragraph describing an economics course there:\n\n > \"The Department of Economics at the Frankfurt School focuses on current issues of competition policy, industrial economics, experimental economics, environmental economics, empirical macroeconomics, monetary, monetary and fiscal policy, which are relevant to practice in politics and economics, International economic and financial relations, development economics and institutional economics.\"\n\nEnvironmental, development, competition.\n\nThat is definitely not an Austrian economics course.", "232" ], [ "China isn't seen as a market economy and receives sanctions from multiple ~~Western~~ developed nations that have relatively free markets as protection from dumping etc.\n\nOn a different note though I assume the trade of roasted coffee beans between the US and China is a very small market by comparison. Also worth mentioning roasted and unroasted coffee beans are probably subject to entirely different tariff rates.", "745" ], [ "Yea... while that sounds scary it's just cloud or dust seeding.\n\nClouds do a lot to prevent the suns radiation heating up the planet. So cloud seeding would be a way you could prevent or reverse climate change. Dust if high enough up in the atmosphere can do the same.\n\nThe issue with cloud seeding is it hasn't been shown to work all that well on a larger scale. To seed effectively even in theory you need massive efforts and amounts of material even though some of the best cloud seeding materials can produce something like 3,000x their own weight in precipitation it is still a massive undertaking.\n\nThis doesn't seem to have been tested but given the effects volcanic eruptions have had in the past it could work.\n\nJust because a bunch of stuff the govt. does is at <PERSON> conspiracy level doesn't mean everything is. This is coming from someone who knows all about #ClimateGate, NASA fudging their numbers to suit the narrative and the recent use of unverified numbers at the Paris climate convention.", "687" ], [ "Sidenote normal planes wouldn't be used to deliver these things.\n\nYou'd have special planes that would fly these things up. I doubt most normal planes would hit the desired altitude in normal flights.\n\nThe average plane flies at 11km up and the stratosphere over the US would start somewhere between 10-13km and goes all the way up to 50km. They'd probably want to get such reflective particles up pretty high.\n\nNot that I am for such efforts since tiny particulates can cause a bunch of health problems and they would likely eventually still end up dropping (although my guess is if you get them high enough in the stratosphere it could take years) all in their own right but testing it and having the knowledge is still good.", "613" ], [ "That's why I mentioned it is worth less than no degree.\n\nPlus of course the fact that many people go into debt and even if they don't the govt. still ends up taxing other people for your useless degree and other financial assistance during the time you're studying.\n\nMore people should specifically talk about it. You lose what US$ 10-25k each year you're studying and not working. Then your education costs the govt. 11-30k per year depending on where you're studying and you get something like 5-20k every year in other benefits from the govt. depending on which country you study in.\n\nThat amounts to just over 50k a year and at the end of a bachelors degree you'd have 150k which is more than enough to start a successful small business. It's technically enough to start and fail 1-2 times before you succeed.\n\nOf course these figures vary greatly by country etc. but in almost every case it is a significant enough sum to start your own business with.", "108" ], [ "It wouldn't surprise me that someone has an idea like this patented. I don't think we'd need to go conspiracy theory. If it works it would make the person heaps of money and it something people have likely thought up decades ago (along with cloud seeding).\n\nI mean if they're doing it to prevent or disperse some of the the suns radiation phrasing it as block the sun is pretty hyperbolic. Maybe cut down on 2-5% of the sunlight (and my guess is even that would beyond current means). Blocking some of the radiation from the sun to prevent heat trapping isn't really a conspiracy theory for a long time. People have known that dust in the atmosphere can cool the planet since ages since 'mini ice ages' happen when there is an extremely large volcanic eruption.\n\nIf it works it could be used to essentially ignore any need to control emissions and just block some sunlight instead. I guess if you're a doomsdayer that could be seen as blacking out the sun. But then you'd have to acknowledge that climate change is real which my guess is most of them don't. If it isn't real there'd be no need for this effort. If it is real slightly less sun isn't necessarily a bad thing. You could keep economic activity much higher which would likely outweigh the benefits of (a probably) imperceptible change in brightness.", "731" ], [ "If framing all women as house maidens is sexist then why isn't framing all men as rapists sexist.\n\nBoth are extremely sexist. Sure there are a lot more housewives than househusbands and the majority of rapes are perpetrated by men but that doesn't say anything about the individual.\n\nI don't understand why so many people have difficulty grasping the fact that the group does not define the individual and the individual does not define the group however group averages still remain relevant when analyzing aggregate data.", "497" ], [ "People don't jump from one point to another. Most transformation is incremental.\n\nNot that I'd be against him using the 'democratically elected slave masters' example just expecting that is a little much.\n\nThings tend to go red pill > OD on blue pills to make the red pill go away (his therapy) > content purple pill > inescapable red pillage > 'What have I done?' 'Nothing will ever be the same again' > Outbursts (we're probably here) > Frustration at the blue pilled masses > acknowledgement that no other path would've led you to where you are > acceptance that since this is true the path is one you must walk alone and come to alone > understanding for those who are blind > leaving a red pill around on the floor whereever you go for those blue pillers brave and curious enough enough to say 'I can handle a little crazy' > the cycle starts over.", "4" ], [ "As always the commies simply steal from the productive folk that provide a world altering idea and ruin it in their own vision.\n\nThis will never change.\n\nIf crypto dies it won't be because markets failed but rather because commies decided they wanted in and then begged daddy govt. to tie this new idea down so tight it cut off all circulation.", "1008" ], [ "Yes. You have understood.\n\nThe false God of reating utopia was surrendered and in its place was the acknowledgement that historically markets have served this Gods purpose very well.\n\nThere is no utopia at the end of the tunnel no matter how hard you believe. There is only the best we can do and it is market competition.\n\nYou get it. No matter which evil you face you cannot beat it by relying on anther evil on some monkey branching explanation.\n\nWelcome to freedom (the strange twisted beast that beauty is). Trust me it will test every one of your principles. Nonetheless you never do tread backwards so maybe it isn't such a treacherous road after all.", "976" ], [ "You can of course choose to share property either to those that have shares or all people.\n\nWhat it would most likely result in is of course parks as they are now but the exclusion of those that ruin or diminish them with strict adherence to no littering and similar things.\n\nShared ownership like in business will be a tenant of anarcho-capitalism. An-Caps also have little to no issue with how you organize your vision of society so long as you do it on your land or the land of your followers. Basically it's a don't tell me what to do or I'll McFighterJet you (unironically, tyranny is not tolerated and heavily armed people aren't the best people to try to oppress).", "1013" ], [ "I mean why am I responsible for defending dipshits? I'm not sure on the details.\n\nI personally am not of the school of faith that argues 'guns make the world safer' although there is actually surprising evidence for this. Genuinely even as an anti-gun type (which amusingly is what I once was) there is ample evidence. Honestly once you unironically throw govt. murder numbers in the 2nd Amendment seems logical.\n\nPersonally I am of the school that no human being should be denied his right to be as lethal as they may be in self-defense.", "349" ], [ "> license fee\n\n > not the govt.\n\nPick one. It's the British states TV^[1] channel and it is funded by a mandatory fee you pretty much cannot get around paying (although in recent times if you can guarantee that you would never ever watch any content the BBC might have produced then you could get away with not paying it).\n\n*[1] This is literally what it says as the first line on the Wikipedia page: \"The British Broadcasting Corporation is a British public service broadcaster. Its headquarters are at Broadcasting House in Westminster, London and it is the world's oldest national broadcasting organisation\". That's literally 4 references to it being a govt. broadcaster in the first 2 sentences.*", "526" ], [ "You're not wrong. Gun free zones are pretty old and poliferated in the US. If I'm not mistaken it's pretty much law in every state that firearms are not permitted in booze serving establishments since quite a while.\n\nI'd also agree overall. The right even the pro-gun folk are at the end anti-gunners by extension since all they do is play defense against the actual anti-gunners and if you never play offense all you can do is lose ground.", "225" ], [ "If you used enough the effect would be the same. Plus I'm sure there is heavy duty foil in the UK for bakeries etc.\n\nIf you've ever watched a timelapse of those foil ball videos what you notice is how much compaction there is and that should have a similar effect past a certain level regardless of the thickness of the original foil.\n\nI just found it interesting considering that the balls seem fairly sturdy by the time they're done.", "304" ], [ "Socialism has historically failed to break apart the family so there is no reason to suspect it would succeed. What has failed to break apart the family is the welfare state. I guess you could consider that a leftist policy and you'd be correct but it isn't socialism.\n\nPlus socialists in the West would choose to get married for much the same reasons other people do. Less taxes, other benefits like access to public housing etc.\n\nNonetheless encountering the ol' 'no true socialism' is always amusing.", "778" ], [ "See the sub-Reddit you're on.\n\nWhat's that first word? Does that make you think someone who would support overseas wars? If you think so maybe consider watching some <PERSON> vids.\n\nPS: the founding fathers did foresee this very issue as well and specifically mentioned not entangling oneself in foreign affairs. Of course over time the govt. grew and grew and became more tyrannical.", "1014" ], [ "Significantly less. 1 million or so in Iraq by the highest estimates and 150,000 or so by the lowest. Korea it was indirectly responsible for 3 million deaths by the highest estimates. Vietnam is also a ballpark figure in that area as a high estaime.\n\nFor references the high estimates of the death toll of socialism aren't 100 million but 250.\n\nWhat's more ironic is the sources that try to attribute the most deaths to the US only come to around 15 million and to get to this figure they use the totally dishonest tactic of attributing the deaths caused by socialist regimes in those countries to the US.\n\nNot that pointing out this massive disparity is endorsement of such things. Criticism of the US military is definitely legitimate.", "55" ], [ "They are. Racists pay for any arbitrary discrimination they impose out of their own pockets. Where the discrimination isn't arbitrary it is obviously appropriate (blind people dont make great race car drivers).\n\nMaking people pay for their poor choices themselves is a great way to internalize an externality.\n\nAt the same time people have the right to pay for whatever they wish so if they wish to pay for bigotry then they do have that right. I guess the CATO institute is trying to virtue signal to the left and as a consequence stabbing liberty in the back and going the path of the LOLberts.", "205" ], [ "I guess it comes closer to theft. I'd still say it was extortion since you're being forced to do something.\n\nTheft would be more akin to the IRS coming by one day a year, breaking into your house or hacking into your back accounts and taking out the amount they think is appropriate.\n\nIn one case resistance would get you shot and killed. In the other you simply get stuff taken away but you also won't get shot.", "695" ], [ "#iF YOu haVE <PERSON> To hiDE <PERSON> hAVe NOThinG TO fEAr\n\nAt least the social credits nightmare in China has most Statist who unironically use some variation of that line thinking for a second that maybe, just maybe this is really tyrannical. They'd probably still vote for it like sheeple because 'I'm a good citizen and very law abiding and love my country so I only stand to gain free transport, a holiday allowance and special speedy processing for govt. documents'.", "347" ], [ "I was unaware of the fact that he used it but doesn't surprise me. It sounds like exactly the kind of reasoning that would get tyrants salivating.\n\nNonetheless on a little background research it doesn't appear that the origin of the statement is <PERSON> but rather that he is also said to have used it. What would be interesting to know is whether <PERSON> arrived at that reasoning/line himself (which I would assume would be rather likely) or actually knew of this work.\n\nIn case you're interested: _URL_0_ . The first link is dead but the others seem to be alive and one had the actual book page.", "520" ], [ "> Thank God we still live at least in a somewhat liberal democracy, if the socialists would get their way, I'd probably be in a Gulag by now.\n\nNot probably, definitely. You questioning the revolution and its crimes is counter-revolutionary.\n\n > If they ban you now, what would they do to you if they had full power?\n\nWalk into your house with a gang of heavily armed thugs. March you out onto the streets at gun point. Kick your knees from behind so you fall to the ground in a prone position. Make you watch as your wife is dragged off into the gulag and your children ripped from her arms to be raised in govt. hands to ensure they become good, loyal and servile communists. Then as they're driving away put a bullet through your brain for the sins of having been moderately well off in the past or for having secretly kept a work of dissident literature.\n\nThe left is full of tyrants. They believe in a world view that has 'an end of time' that is the utopia (this is actually the socialist vision, all societal progress halts and forever stays ideal). Thus for them any crime is justifiable as the ends justify the means. All of this is a dark example of the aphorism \"Perfect is the enemy of the good\".", "870" ], [ "Infinite gun ownership seems like it would be the way to go.\n\nWould make secession much easier and allow people the right to live as they please. Some people would choose zero taxation (An-Caps), others might choose extremely limited taxation 1-2% (Minarchists), others will choose low taxation 2-10% (Libertarians and Classical Liberals) none of which would come from an income tax. At the same time you would have people who choose something akin to the current situation and there would people who would choose even more. The main point is peope should be able choose.\n\nCurrently it seems that in the US about half the population leans to the 10% or less side and half leans to the 40% or more side. It wouldn't seem just to force either group to live one way or another.\n\nIf it is an either/or scenario I'd still have to go with gun ownership simply because if there were zero taxation and no gun rights then no one would have guns which means that the people and society would be helpless to defend itself against any criminal be they part of a group or acting alone, in other words govt. would be back in a matter of weeks with the productive at the mercy of the violent.\n\nIf it were a very restrictive either/or scenario i.e.: current firearms legislation+zero taxation vs. current taxation+all the weapons and it cannot diverge from this point then the question becomes harder. In this case I would tend to lean towards no taxation. This hypothetical is just that though since nothing would remain frozen in time and or course things change daily on the political landscape.", "225" ], [ "In the end the free market wins. It's just a matter of time.\n\nWhile it might seem like liberty is losing grounds currently (which mightn't be a wrong observation although it's usually very Western based) the long term outcome will be that markets win and suppressing the truth becomes ever harder and costlier the longer you attempt to do it.\n\nIn the end something close to anarcho-capitaism is the likely end game. Whether it takes us a few thousand years to realize or the machines a century to is the real question.\n\nI know given our current socio-political situation this might sound crazy but consider that noone in the 1200s would've surmised that fairly broad reaching albeit limited freedom was on the horizon for even the most backwards citizen in the most backwards nation.", "725" ], [ "Capitalist dog. Someone get this guy a yellow collar. I can already hear <PERSON> doggy saying the bourgeoisie humans are exploiting you by making you do tricks as though it isn't a mutually beneficial relationship.\n\n\"~~Leaves are~~ Fiat is no good because ~~trees~~ central bankers can just make more any time they like and before you know it your money is worthless.\"\n\nOn a side note it is genuinely impressive to see a dog connect the dots. Granted he didn't quite get that leaves =/= money. Nonetheless this is great apes level thinking maybe even more since the monkeys had to be taught what money was and this dog essentially barring one small mistake figured it out. Someone just needs to get him a basque cap and he's set for lunch.", "996" ], [ "The best way to go about it would be to use every possible deduction/credit etc.\n\nCompletely avoiding paying taxes is unlikely to be possible if you work for a corporation since they will be paying for example payroll taxes for you.\n\nThe only way to do this would be to either:\n\n - Be self-sufficient and live off your plot\n\n - Work cash in hand and \n\nAnything else and you will eventually get caught and even those two options aren't safe since in one case it is illegal and the other the govt. technically still has a claim to if I am not mistaken 20% of your productivity (although I doubt they would come for it).", "940" ], [ "It still isn't real money. It is a crypto-currency. It's right there in the name. Beyond that you don't need to be on BTC.\n\nRework this to hoarding gold, silver and copper and it might be appropriate.\n\nNonetheless moving away from traditional payment options i.e.: fiat/banking system fiat and exchanging them for something like crypto-currency or metal money would be a very good thing to do and more people need to start doing it.", "71" ], [ "Monarchy at least preserves property rights for one individual. In any collectivist world no one can own anything and everything is at the whim of collective via dumbocracy. Dumbocracy is notorious for its lack of respect for private property as one can see with the insane taxes you have in the West and the number of Western nations that have fallen to the spell of socialism/fascism/eminent domain/asset forfeiture. Monarchs tend to keep taxes low because they have to keep everyone happy and for some reason having a monarch steal 50% of your property would likely end in an immediate revolution anywhere you try and implement it but if it's stolen via dumbocracy everyone seems to tacitly accept this.\n\nAn-Coms are usually just Stalinists who've rebranded themselves out of necessity or take 30 minutes of argumentation to get to where the tankies are.\n\nThey aren't anarchists in the sense that they would let you peacefully do what you want and setup An-Cap communities. They will murder you if you try and have capatalism, reinvent money, trade labour or land voluntarily for currency or money in their An-Com world (which incidentally was pretty much what happened in Russia).\n\nSo An-Caps aren't naturally allies with the An-Coms and it isn't really their choice. Most An-Caps are fine with tolerating An-Com communes in An-Capistan but you'll need luck to find any significant number of An-Coms that would tolerate An-Caps in An-Comistan. When you ask you specifically need to mention what this means namely that they will continue to practice or reinvent the capitalist mode of production, they will reinvent money/currency, all property including fertile agricultural land will be privately owned and traded and people will trade their labour for this money/currency. An-Synds will also tend to go tanky on your ass if you mention this. This isn't entirely inconsistent with their backwards ideology, after all most of then believe that if capitalism exist anywhere then communism cannot or will not exist because it will 'fall prey' to capitalism/capitalists.", "101" ], [ "Some people choose not to deny reality. To be anything but a race realist is akin to being a flat earther. Nonetheless you'll find lots of them over at GoldandBlack.\n\nThere are significant difference between the races/ethnic groups etc. This doesn't just extend to race but you can look at Y haplo groups, mitochondrial DNA, similar trends among emigrants even from the same ethnic group as the people that do not emigrate (although this isn't directly genetic but very likely has some underlying basis e.g.: higher IQ or willingness to take risks, or predispositions to a given type of thought), individual genes that influence intelligence or running ability or succeptibility to disease etc.\n\nThe reality is racists have an overly superficial view of genetics which will lead to an overly simplistic understanding of the world.\n\nThe problem arises when people begin to use group averages to define the individual. This should never be done, group averages can only ever be applied to groups not individuals but observations made about groups aren't invalidated by the reality that any one individual from that group might not suit the average.\n\nTo put it into terms that put a little distance between the issue and peoples fifis, while any woman might be taller or stronger than any man on average it is safe to assume that if you have a group of 100 men and a group of 100 women if you measure their height or strength and average it that men will come out both taller and stronger than women. The chances that this isn't the case shrink to effectively 0 very quickly when you increase the size of the group you're measuring. If you're a male height and strength denier you're simply put someone who denies reality for sake of ideology or because the implications thereof make you uncomfortable.", "987" ], [ "> cia, and foreign shills in the defaults.\n\nAs long as they $hill for what spez wants.\n\n > Does the editing of comments means no Reddit comment can be used in court or the blame would be put on Reddit it self?\n\nI don't actually know. My guess is they'll continue to be used but in theory now every comment in the future should be ineligible and anyone convicted in part due to evidence from such comments should have the oppotunity to contest it but I doubt this will happen. People and courts in general probably don't even know about this and would choose to ignore it rationalizing that 'he learned his lesson and totally won't do it again'.", "620" ], [ "This is news...?!\n\nVideo game journalists really need to choke on a d*ck. It's like they never play video games until they try one for two hours to review it. Getting team killed and teambagged is like 101 online video games, every kid and their grandmother does it.\n\nMy money is on the fact that said journalist sucked balls and the guy team killed her after his rampage to drive hom how much she blows and how she's dead weight.\n\nNever mind it's literally right there in the article. She literally states that he thought he was just messing around with his friend which should illustrate just how common place and inane the gesture is.\n\n > \"‘Now, granted he thought I was his “dev buddy” by accident, but holy shit was that a mistake,’ she added.\"\n\nI swear crap like this would just serve to reinforce 'women shouldn't play 'serious' video games' attitude. If they can't even take a mild mannered joke I'm sure they'll do great in a team where half a dozen people are ripping on them because they have a K/D of 0.5 or managed to lose the team an objective with a mistake that everyone inevitably ends up making at least once every few hours.", "425" ], [ "> Both the SJWs and the alt-'right' are fringe factions whose relevance is vastly exaggerated by sensationalist media, because that's what media does.\n\nIncorrect. Radfems have been and are shaping public policy. See the Duluth model, all the quotas in companies, the constant political discussion regarding the wage gap myth/female CEOs etc. so much so that the last both presidents have addressed it. Policy in some Southern European countries that merely being accused of domestic violence as a man ends in you without any investigation being throw in jail for 1-3 days (Spain and Portugal if I recall correctly).\n\n > The vast majority of people are just getting on with their lives, and aren't even involved in the conflict.\n\nThat's the danger. Have you taken any time to look at how the media and academia are now dominated by leftists. In media I believe it's 1:8, in academia its over all about 1:14 which varies from 1:4 in STEM to 1:80 in some social sciences. In fact in social sciences it's more likely that a self-identified Marxist (who knows how many closet ones there are) will teach kids than a right-leaning individual.", "965" ], [ "Chop your dick off, turn it into a faux-vagina, keep it but get tits if you want I don't mind. Don't expect or force me to pay for it (or the long term potential costs associated with it) and don't expect to be able to tell me what I can and cannot say or think.\n\nIf you just like dressing up in girly clothes then by all means cross dress I don't care.\n\nWhen it comes down to sexual relations I would expect the courtesy to let someone know that you are a transsexual and whether you are post- or pre-op but in general this seems to already be the case and only the hardcore SJWs disagree with doing this.\n\nI think gender dysphoria is a condition and that if you look at the evidence most kids who think they might be trans usually do grow out of it and given the rather serious implications being trans tends to have on your mental health it would be best if people end up reverting back to identifying with their biological gender. So no sterilizing kids at 6 years old to look progressive in front of your friends. Hormone treatment and similar things if they are fully cognizant and capable of understanding the implications would be fine by me but I think you should encourage people considering it to at least go through 2 years of puberty to see if that doesn't have an effect (plus for M to F trans folk puberty is necessary to later get gender reassignment surgery).\n\nGenerally I would advise people to play dress up and not mess with their body by either having surgery or taking hormones that aren't naturally in their bodies because that is something that is irreversible and will limit your ability to for example procreate or go back to leading a more normal life if you ask me personally but I'd advise something similar in most cases and would say the same for other irreversible elective surgery and I already advise women to stay away from the pill primarily because it messes with their hormones and secondarily because female pregnancy can also mess with surrounding males hormones and potentially the hormone levels of amphibians in nearby waters. That's just my sincere advice though if I were asked. At the end of the day it's not my choice and if someone doesn't choose to specifically ask me or indirectly ask me (e.g.: tagging me in some group) I won't chime in. You do you.", "390" ], [ "They have the right. The state shouldn't have the right to blanket ban them.\n\nIf you want to live in a community that not only bans guns but goes so far as to ban all knives, hammers and similar deadly weapons then by all means you should be able to move to one or form one.\n\nAt the same time if I want to live in a community that allows private fighter jets (hint: I might) then I get to move to one or found one.\n\nEveryone else who sits somewhere in between on the issue can find or found an appropriate community.\n\nThat way everyone gets to live as close to what they desire as possible.", "225" ], [ "Disclaimer: there are some alt-right folk that have found refuge here (every other sub-Reddit tends to hate freedom of expression and loves silencing people who have bad ideas) and in general they are rather unfriendly to such ideas. Although they aren't far-right. They generally identify as collectivists and lean socialist.\n\nThere are also 2 that regularly brigade here and one of them has already responded. Another might later on.\n\nGenerally though even they are fine with your as they would say 'degeneracy' but don't want it forced upon them and given the current political climate are extremely worried about that being a real possibility. Given 'bake the cake' and similar cases surfacing there is some legitimacy to their fears.", "965" ], [ "I most definitely am not a national socialist and share almost nothing with their ideologies. I pretty much share the polar opposite opinion on many subjects.\n\nDid you read the first 2 paragraphs?\n\nHave you actually looked at the data points I mentioned. I mean this isn't some conspiracy or me painting trans people as anything evil. If pointing out that something like 88% of kids who think they might be trans end up not being trans and 40% of trans people have attempted suicide (which is a very significant overrepresentation) makes people assume ill will then maybe those people just come at you with preconceived notions themselves.\n\nHonestly I've been travelling through nations where transsexualism is very common* since I was a kid so insinuating I'd be a Nazi because I mention two uncomfortable truths and you interpret those as transphobia is rather laughable and would say a lot more about you than me.\n\n > people would accuse you of being one\n\nYou're a Nazi if you believe in free speech, you're a Nazi if you believe in freedom of association, you're a Nazi if you believe in limited govt., you're a Nazi if you believe Nazis are also people and thus should have the same rights as other people presuming they don't harm anyone, you're a Nazi if you believe in the right of people to defend themselves, you're a Nazi if you speak out about religious persecution you have suffered at the hands of a particularly peaceful religion, you're a Nazi if you're for limited government, you're a Nazi if you win arguments so I'll give you that. It doesn't surprise me much when I get called a Nazi by leftists/~~pro~~regressives.\n\nTheir willingness to assume that someone who on the Libertarian axis so somewhere between a classical liberal an An-Cap would like national socialism means they need a boogeyman.\n\n---\n\n*Maybe common isn't the right word in that I haven't actually looked up the per capita numbers of the whole country or whether it is a regional overrepresentation or a particularly out there trans culture but suffice to say these are places where if you walk down the streets you will encounter transsexuals and if you go on any dating/hookup app there'll be hundreds of trans people.", "743" ], [ "> I don't believe anybody worthy of being treated like people, if they prove they're willing to show that they don't want to treat others like people.\n\nSo do we gas them? I mean if they aren't people then I mean we could do that. You know, \"pest control\". Ah maybe gassing is a little extreme. Maybe we just relocate them to special containment facilities and give them meaningful work that might free them from their evil ways?\n\nI mean you sound a lot more like the Nazis by making that statement than I do. You've literally denied people's humanity because they had shitty ideas even when the explicit qualifier that they weren't harming anyone was added. I mean I don't think that changes the fact that you shouldn't dehumanize people, obviously it would legitimize force as self-defense depending on necessity killing them but you should still think you killed a human, just one that held pretty shitty ideas and was a bad person because he wanted to actively harm you.\n\n > I was expressly attempting to avoid calling you a nazi\n\nShould probably try harder. It's usually a fairly simple task. Don't call people a Nazi or insinuate they are. \"if you sound like an honest to god nazi\" & \"mods of r/nationalsocialism\".\n\nI don't want to call you a backwards regressive snowflake that reacts to anything but absolute agreement and total capitulation by low key shouting Nazi but you know you sure sound like one I just interacted with. See how that works.\n\n > tirade\n\nWell it's pretty much the current political climate. You can find lefties calling everyone Nazis pretty much anywhere online.\n\n > They're people with an unfortunate disorder for which there is really only one effective treatment\n\nI'm not following? You sound pretty extreme there. Are you denying transsexuals exist? I mean I'm guessing this is you taking offense to some term that might have a specific meaning within your circles but colloquially is interchangeable for trans, transgender, ladyboy, FtM or whatever.\n\nAre you saying there is only one solution for everyone? Honestly that sounds real totalitarian of you. It also sounds like something that is absolutely untrue. I'm sure what everyone needs is slightly different. Some might want hormonal replacement therapy, some might not. Some might want gender reassignment surgery others might not. Some might want cosmetic surgery others might not. Then of course mix and match those categories.\n\n > group of fetishists\n\nI mean in my experience they're definitely overrepresented in this group -which doesn't really bother me at all, I've been through my degeneracy which would probably outdo all but the very wildest people- but obviously that doesn't mean all of them are. Then again that could be my experience.\n\n---\n\n40% suicide rate. I mean a fair consideration is that supposedly transgenderism tends to be more common if people suffer some other mental illness so that could explain some of the disparity. Which link would you like:\n\n_URL_2_\n\n_URL_3_\n\n_URL_0_\n\n_URL_1_\n\n88%. So that appears to have been one study and 3 others had values between 61-88%.\n\n_URL_4_\n\nIf you want to dig up the studies feel free to.", "743" ], [ "> Transgeder People\n\nImpressive. You start off policing what I say. Trannies. Transsexuals. I'd like to add more terms I'd assume would infuriate you but I don't really know any besides those two.\n\nEveryone is a person. It doesn't require some additional qualifier. When I say SJWs or feminists or right-wingers or lefties it is obvious to everyone that they are people. Well maybe not to you since you dehumanize some types of people you dislike but that's not the norm and should never become the norm.\n\n > almost as if you're afraid that somebody's caught onto your bullshit\n\nNo. More like I'm going to call someone's bullshit when they insinuate stuff that isn't true because they got hit with some things they don't like.\n\nAlso going to point out that you shouldn't dehumanize people. I mean you're free to but it's definitely not a 'good' thing to do.\n\n > What's the harm in making HRT more readily accessible if it can help bring those down?\n\nYou seem to not be considering which sub-Reddit you are on. In An-Capistan the hormones are there, if you want them you buy them with your money (feel free to raise money voluntarily if you want).\n\n > I don't see why the suicide rate is an issue for you, somebody who is not trans.\n\nI was thinking of it as though my child were trans. Most people don't tend to like dead children so I guess that was kind of on my priority list. So is making sure they don't sterilize themselves before they are old enough to fully comprehend what that means and also ideally after they have made some sort of backup plan so that if they want to have kids they can.\n\nBeyond that I genuinely came from a place of compassion where I tried to think of what I would give as advice if someone sincerely asked me and I wanted the healthiest outcome for them and that would be don't get surgery, don't take hormones and enjoy life otherwise, I guess cross dress and eat normal foods/herbs that boost male hormones and lower female hormones or vica versa. In 10 years VR will likely be great quality and you'll be able to live a different life a few hours a day. In a few decades they'll probably be able to transplant your brain into another body (at least I'd assume it would be possible at some point in their lifetime if they were born in e.g.: 2020). I'd already qualified they can do what they want once they are old enough to pass some sort of standardized test people in An-Capistan would take to transition to self-determination (probably happens somewhere between 13-15 for most people).\n\n > correlation between parents accepting their children's gender identities\n\nMy kids come in one gender. Attack helicopter. If they want to be degenerate weirdos that get off on dressing up in animal costumes and using dragon dildos that doesn't bother me but the moment they tell me they're actually a cat or some bullshit like that I'll call their bullshit.\n\nYou sound like someone that doesn't do the trans community any favours. You seem like a little tyrant that wants to tell me and other people how to live our lives and guilt me into sterilizing a hypothetical trans child before they've even hit puberty and could properly and wholly comprehend the implications of such an action.", "390" ], [ "That sounds like you would have the scenario that could allow An-Capistan to come about.\n\nNonetheless there'd be some unaddressed issues like what to do with public land that would need to be settled.\n\nAn-Capistan is in essence everyone seceding from everyone else/everything and then reorganizing. That does sound like it would allow for that to happen.\n\nJust letting states secede in general would be great. So if all Federations or Republics became confederations I'm sure 90% of the political problems currently plaguing the West would resolve themselves over a decade.", "795" ], [ "You're thinking of a different alt-right. That was what the alt-right was before the media smear campaign and before people for some reason ceded the name to a very small minority of people who also had that label and were people with a very unpleasant ideology.\n\nThe shitposters, attack helicopters, memelords and worshippers of KEK should've realized this and not caved to the media smear campaign and just assumed the label and disavowed the people who were backwards.", "294" ], [ "Well there were two alt-right eras for lack of a better word. The one before the major smear campaign and the one after.\n\nThe one before was shitposters, memelords etc. and a tiny minority of white nationalists.\n\nThe one after the media smear campaign was/is just the white nationalists since. For some reason instead of excising the white nationalists and saying this is our label now we're 99% of the people they let them have it.\n\nSince then they've really failed to make a new uniting label/group. They tried with the new right but that didn't stick and wasn't as interesting so it was a very effective smear campaign by the media to silence opposition by using guilt by association.", "68" ], [ "Its the amount of the end difference that can be explained via genetic variation.\n\nThere you go. Trying to obfuscate the truth, namely significant variance in many things between many groups with some massive widening of the goal posts. Everyone would acknowledge that if someone is starving the heritability of traits would decrease but this is effectively never the case in the West and even in the developing world excluding currently struggling African nations and India. No one else would contest that some massive changes in the environment might affect heritability, if we all become cyborgs with 99% of our processing power in computer chips it'll likely reduce heritability to near 0. Where those studies are done people have their basic needs met.", "769" ], [ "Self-identified categories tend to work pretty well with them being something like 98% accurate. Generally it would be people with a recent migratory background out of Africa.\n\n > black skin color, hair and eyes\n\nI mean this isn't true since there are Albinos and I'm sure there are also pockets of people somewhere in Africa that developed some mutation that makes their hair red or something similar as some of the people from Papua have done.\n\n > infinitesimal portion of the human genome\n\nAs I'd said before it's an imperfect system and one that is insufficiently complex. Currently the best proxies people use are self-identified race and skin colour, hair, eye colour, facial features etc. tend to be a good proxy for Ancestry from e.g.: Africa.\n\nThis is you wilfully misunderstanding something you would in every other case get.\n\nFurthermore if you put 100 people with ancestry from Europe, 100 people with Ancestry from East Asia and 100 people with ancestry from Africa in a room you would without any additional info identify them accurately (or almost all of them presuming you have seen whites, blacks and Asians often enough before).\n\n > necessarily correlate with any other characteristics, such as intelligence?\n\nAs I'd poined out race is a superficial understanding of human population differences. Then again for how poor a system it actually is it does produce much better results that one might expect. Obviously if you wanted to e.g.: estimate the IQ of or height (insert other characteristic here) of someone it would be much better to know which country they are from or even better which ethnic group in that country than to just know a broad geographic region of ancestry.\n\nAt the same time if I take a random sample of 100 East Asians and 100 Africans and don't purposely attempt to cherry pick and manipulate data and just gave you 200 cards and said pick the group that is taller and pick the group that has a higher IQ anyone could do it simply by separating out the photos and very likely (barring intentional selection bias and a massive anomaly) be right. For a terrible system it does rather well on some tests, but again I'm the ones saying it is a simplistic and incomplete understanding.\n\n > Papua New Guinea, belong to the same race? What if I told you that those two groups, which look identical, are the two most genetically distant populations on the planet? \n\nNo because they have different ancestry and this has been tested. We have proxy migratory paths. Even with the previous understanding of race several maps had a separate category for Australian aboriginals and Papua peoples. Also if you go over general characteristics you'll find they're rather different from Africans and one massive tell that everyone would pick up on is height. Furthermore just as you've pointed out it would be extremely easy to identify them with some genetic test. There is an entire industry that works on just identifying your ancestry via genes without any input.", "769" ], [ "I don't know if I explicitly stated it in this comment thread and guess I didn't.\n\nMy solution and generally the one offered in an Libertarian circles would simply be voluntary dissociation. Then people who wish to have white communities can, people who wish to have black communities can and people who wish to live in mixed communities can. This is entirely compatible with liberty.\n\nIn general secession would also immediately be permitted (I do actually foresee secession coming about in our generation in the US) and given the massive divide on political issues it's very likely the South would split off, the East Coast, the West Coast and the Mid Western states. Since the Mid Western states are still very similar to the demographics of the USA (at least pertaining to white share of the population) you'd have a potential solution there. If not you could always move to one region or one state and then further secede.\n\nBanning white/black/Asian supermajority nations tends to be an issue for the totalitarians and the leftists. Personally I don't think any An-Cap has an issue with Liberia (only permits black Africans citizenship), Japan (effectively an isolationist ethno-state) or some hypothetical white nation. I'd argue being too stringent always ends up tyrannical and you should avoid this but given the fact that both those examples also allow exceptions (you don't have to be black/Japanese to live or work in Japan/Liberia but you have to meet specific criterion) I'd imagine the hypothetical white nation would also.", "1020" ], [ "Finding people with shared values isn't collectivism. Individualism is putting the individual above the collective.\n\nIn other words individualists who would live amongst individualist would put the liberty of the individual above MUH SOCIETY. In short stuff like freedom of association, no unwarranted searches, no arbitrary restrictions on self-defense for MUH CHILDREN etc.\n\nCollectivists put the interests of the collective above those of the individual. This means that guns are banned because someone might shoot someone, the right to privacy isn't granted because someone might be plotting some attack, the freedom to associate isn't granted because the collective has its rights and you will serve them.\n\nAs you might be able to extrapolate from those examples one society tends to lead to a rather 'free' society where people would very likely want to live and the other sounds like given time it would almost certainly end in tyranny.\n\nThis argument is a fallacious one and a rather weak one which almost sounds like it stemmed from some 'critique' of the 'Liberalists' saga on YouTube. It seems to stem from a misunderstanding of the term and goals of Individualism. Individualism doesn't seek to create atomized individuals (although some might choose this but this is already the case in all societies with hermits/monks etc.) but organize society in a way that the rights of the individual are the highest goal. Individuals can choose to work together and cooperate. Individualists don't say you shouldn't or couldn't.", "627" ], [ "I mean isn't there already such a voice if you consider that you could Balkanize? If You look at voting patterns it's pretty clear certain states definitely aren't buying lefty propaganda and neither are rural/some suburban areas.\n\nI think the main issue isn't really pro-white advocacy that is lacking but anti-white demonization which has been encouraged by the establishment and been allowed to run free. If this didn't happen I don't think the current situation would have come to fruition. I also think the push back against this and calling it out for what it is while it might not appear that way currently is extremely effect. The meteoric rise of anti-SJWism in just two years is in my opinion a good example. Another 5 years and the Marxist plot that has likely been in the workings since the 60s will be undone by random people pointing out examples of bigotry to their friends and associates in person. I also think it's time people justly call out pro-X advocacy groups for what they are and do away with them through public shaming. If this doesn't happen the logical step would be that every group gets an advocacy group.\n\nThe problem is advocacy groups were at one point doing a necessary job. The issue is then they fell to what all institutions fall to which is that when they have achieved their goal instead of saying \"Alright we've done it, time to go out and get a real job\" the people involved ended up finding new issues and over time these become ever more insignificant and it even spills over into these advocacy groups having to create issues out of thin air. I think this is the main problem, any advocacy group that gets formed doesn't disband after it achieves its stated goal.", "1020" ], [ "Socialists tend to be upper middle class champagne socialists.\n\nThey are well off enough for their parents to pay for their uni, their housing and give them some pocket money. In some cases this will even continue ome years post graduation. They also don't tend to have children and think of a family as some sort of burden.\n\nThus they spend a lot of time online.\n\nIn the 'real world' most people are just working and want to get by and have their family to take care of so they don't have time to waste on the internet.", "534" ], [ "When doesn't the left engage honestly with ideas? Did you watch what Vice did with <PERSON> interview?\n\nIf you were on a news network and said \"if you believe in freedom of speech then this also means Nazis should be free to speak\" you know they'd cut it to \"Nazis should be free to speak\".\n\nIf they engages with the right and its ideas honestly they would either lose the moral highground (which they cannot afford to do) and lose the argument (which they technically lost 30 years back).\n\nThis sub-Reddit doesn't thought police so there are a few groups that engage in this:\n\n - An-Cucks / LOLbertairans that are totally for Libertarianism but freedom of association is NOT OK! You can have free markets where you will trade with everyone regardless of your values if not you're a BIGOT REEE!\n\n - Alt-righters that try an come up with the lowest effort 'gotchas' on how socialism would totally work better than some straw man that is so dumb it ignores even the very basic tenants of An-Caps e.g.: self-defense.\n\n - Lefty $hills that occasionally stop by and try to do any of the following gaslight, false flag, subversively infiltrate, argue from no position at all just to have you change your position, make political hitlists and similar pleasantries.\n\nYou can get banned here but that basically takes months of spamming and brigading. Think 8 weeks of posting 3-15 low quality posts/comments daily with no other purpose than to engage in bad faith.", "965" ], [ "Poverty actually has a much lower impact on your life outcome than IQ in the West. People with high IQs tend to be able to escape poverty. Some Asian PhD. was investigating this and after normalizing for IQ found that blacks, whites and Asians pretty much had little to no gap.\n\nRace realists don't argue for discrimination. They just point out that the blank slate nonsense the left adopted and managed to push into everyones head based on backwards USSR Lysenkoist thought is exactly that, nonsense.\n\nBy the way the point you raised regarding Indians is an interesting one. What you'll find is in general Indians in India aren't very successful but Indian emigrants to most nations tend to be very successful. There is some preselection that happens there which seems to be responsible for this, think about what that might be, IQ lets you earn more and if you are from a country with very low income being able to emigrate requires an above average income as well as above average risk taking, confidence and self-sufficiency. This is similar to the Chinese that moved to America pre-1924. <PERSON> has some good content regarding this on YouTube.\n\n > any perceived intelligence gap\n\nIt's real. Nonetheless having a free market system will allow those with drive or ability to succeed. What you'll find is that while income and IQ correlate rather well wealth and IQ doesn't correlate all that well and this is because making money depends on being competent but keeping money depends on other characteristics e.g.: being conscientious, frugal etc. Even if you make millions a year it's very easy to blow it.", "438" ], [ "Well running normal IQ figures on Nigeria there are 1-2 million Nigerians that are more intelligent than the average white person in the US.\n\nIf you look at the number of them that go on to get degrees or higher education you also realize they very likely have those genes that contribute to a propensity to go for higher education.\n\nIn poor countries like Nigeria there is a preselection process. You don't get to emigrate at choice. You have to be someone who manages to make 'a small fortune' in that country to be able to send you Child to the US or move to the US with you family. Income correlates fairly well with IQ and wealth tends to correlate fairly well with conscientiousness so you have a situation where there is a preselection for two of the best criterion to be successful in the modern economy and on top of that Nigerians that emigrate just so happen to also be very inclined to higher education (I think it's 94% go on to get degrees).\n\nPeople who understand these things wouldn't be against such immigrants although correcting for regression to the mean would still be necessary so that might drop the number from 1-2 million to 0.2-0.5 million.", "438" ], [ "> These leftist socalled anarchists are the biggest threat against anarchism.\n\nAgreed. They aren't anarchists on average. They are just Stalinists that rebranded and realized they had to embrace different rhetoric after their baby the USSR failed miserably. No longer could they lead with such authoritarian principles such as dictatorships of the proletariat or violent revolution where the bourgeoisie are 'done away with' because the world had seen not only the failure but also the horrors caused. So they rebranded and now use softer initial rhetoric and use vulnerable people as their armor against criticism but little has fundamentally changed.", "285" ], [ "I quote both <PERSON> and the girl in my comments.\n\nObviousy I was referring to her response since <PERSON> is the interviewer and interviewers generally don't give their own opinions but rather ask questions about those of the people they are interviewing and as you mention on contentious issues take play 'devil's advocate'.\n\nOn top of that anyone who has seen even a few minutes of <PERSON> knows it is his style.", "182" ], [ "Am I the only person seeing the irony here that someone would post stuff to an An-Cap page that literally has 'taxes are necessary' in it.\n\nYou see how that might be a little like shooting yourself in the foot.\n\nSure she points out that a bunch of taxes are hidden from consumers and that is a very good point. Prices should always disclose taxes, fees and other special costs. Pointing that out doesn't make up for MUH ROADS.\n\nThis would be akin to me posting something on some commie sub-Reddit where the interviewer, mid interview asks \"But isn't private property necessary so that people don't starve\" and then the interviewee responds with \"Of course\" and them giving it dozens if not hundreds of up-votes.", "322" ], [ "The ridiculous thing is the female journalist in question knew and even stated that she knew the developer who team killed and then teabagged her actually thought it was his developer buddy.\n\nShe literally got caught in their inside joke by accident and got so offended she had to tell everyone and attempt to get the guy fired.\n\nLet that sink in. That's how spiteful and intolerant the 'tolerant left^TM ' is.", "402" ], [ "I wouldn't push her out but she definitely isn't a Libertarian. She's a fiscal conservative but definitely a Statist.\n\nIf that were to happen in some real life conversation I'd just have a little chuckle and explain the humour of it to her to see if she'd be receptive to the idea and otherwise leave it at that.\n\nPersonally I think she is promoting coercion and supports extortion but to a lesser degree. I think you could with time change her mind on the issue.\n\nTo me it's just the irony of someone posting this to an An-Cap page, it being significantly up-voted and also being produced by ReasonTV which has definitely been heading in the direction of LOLbertarianism.", "759" ], [ "I was comparing the costs of the military industrial complex which is in the hands of the neocons and the welfare industrial complex which is in the hands of the neo libs.\n\nThus 700B vs. 3-3.5B.\n\nAlso presuming RINOs, cuckservatives etc. are all conservatives is definitely foolish. Taxes got cut, spending didn't but expecting both those in 1 year would be a little much. Granted it is the wrong order but passing one is more permanent than the other (budgets are yearly and the last major tax reform was in 86). Those tax cuts will likely be there for a decade if not several. Prioritize permanent change if you're in a temporary office.", "264" ], [ "Just giving you a heads up that you posted this 5 times.\n\nAlso those are just scams. They operate on the idea that the odds of rain are X%, the price of making it look like you're doing something is Y, the difference to what you charge is Z. So you just got to make sure that Z > X x Y.\n\nThey do that with 'lasers' in many places around the world claiming 2-4 1000W input not output lasers could have any effect on weather is nonsense (well even output but at least those would be serious lasers then).\n\nThis is just some nonsense conspiracy theory.\n\nCloud seeding does the literal opposite of stopping rain. It is meant to help bring about rain. Cloud seeding can work but it is no where near as effictive as is desirable and would require a massive area to be covered to prevent rain for a wedding which can take several hours if not half a day. You'd never get those operational costs covered for that fee.", "731" ], [ "The alternative is starvation. You will find that child labour only exists where it is necessary. Currently in the poor regions of the third world, the richer ones have already largely moved past this. This tends to exist under a certain level and it sits around 600-800 dollars real purchasing value. You'll find this was common in the West just 200 years ago as well.\n\nAfter people pass this barrier and it is no longer to have that addition source of income parents will let their children learn, play etc.\n\nThe moral argument is very simple. You do not get to take things from people. The left isn't good. It believes in stealing from people at gun point. Doing this makes any 'good action' necessarily an evil one.", "246" ], [ "Just a reminder that the New York Times published pieces by an author who gobbled up KGB propaganda that covered up the Holodomor. Not only this but the reporter received a Pulitzer for this which he has never been stripped of.\n\nThe media has been infested with leftist forever. They are there for only one reason. To indoctrinate the useful idiots into an ideology that will destroy them so that the politicians and cronies might benefit.", "827" ], [ "Specific radical, hateful groups that are anti-free expression in the left which have these days all but monopolized the public face and talking points of the left. Whether its tacit endorsement, complicity or lack of self-policing from the rest of the left doesn't interest me.\n\nTolerant Left^TM is a meme referring specifically to those elements so if you aren't part of them, don't tacitly endorse their ideology and aren't complicit in them acting as a vanguard for those beliefs while you fence sit then consider yourself excluded. Self-policing shouldn't be your duty since you aren't responsible for the actions or ideas of others but in general if you are the last (obviously a bit of hyperbole) liberal (the real kind) left on the left you can't be offended by the fact that most people who encounter you might initially presume you to be illiberal.", "965" ], [ "It isn't important from the moral standpoint. They are both Statists.\n\nIt is important from the pragmatic standpoint. I don't like extortion but less extortion beats more extortion.\n\nMe choosing less extortion doesn't mean I am endorsing the state but merely acting in my own best interest in being subject to the minimal amount of extortion. That's the sick thing about the state. It makes good people do bad things for good reasons.", "817" ], [ "Because you can choose who you associate with. Any and all arbitrary discrimination must be OK if you wish to preserve liberty.\n\nMe choosing not to talk to you isn't aggression. I don't owe you my conversation, I don't owe you my labour etc.\n\nGays get to tell straights to get out of their clubs, conservatives get to tell gay people they aren't going to bake them a cake, black people get to tell white people they aren't cutting their hair etc.\n\nThink of it this way. You probably don't want to be forced to suck a racist old grandpas dick? Well the logical extreme of your side of the argument which is anti-discrimination would mean that is unacceptable and you must suck his dick. You can't discriminate against people based on opinion, you can't discriminate against people based on sex and you can't discriminatee against people based on age.", "16" ], [ "Both sides will become worse. This is generally the natural course of the state.\n\nThe question is at what rate and how much time does that buy to possibly get attention for liberty.\n\nOf course old school conservatives like classical liberals wouldn't necessarily fall for this but the problem is if you're in such a battle then the only thing you can do to fight for more liberty is to fight for less and so even well meaning people with the right principles have their hands tied.\n\nSecession is the answer but it'll be a while.", "725" ], [ "Colleges get massive amounts of funds from the govt. and the govt. is heavily invested in pushing this propaganda. Then govt. makes them wealthy by guaranteeing student loans i.e.: letting them raise prices as high as they want.\n\nAffirmative action has turned most campusses that embraced it into laughing stocks and their degrees will be worthless come a decade or so.", "108" ] ]
128
[ 3999, 19757, 13159, 8302, 24894, 16468, 12846, 11084, 21153, 10026, 5775, 18407, 14773, 7199, 8158, 5466, 4768, 8843, 7828, 115, 6741, 2131, 4638, 19515, 20613, 19243, 18381, 8581, 9227, 159, 10303, 24534, 4389, 3416, 10872, 9123, 18865, 15186, 12465, 21054, 15585, 2105, 10081, 12043, 11758, 4136, 16533, 18362, 13008, 7436, 15483, 4782, 8116, 9677, 7050, 4915, 3928, 9889, 13498, 24056, 8243, 12480, 14685, 11403, 18212, 3421, 19347, 14200, 20423, 4203, 8804, 16102, 2017, 7464, 1652, 7331, 10955, 14855, 9028, 25170, 2686, 10031, 12325, 23685, 10178, 11192, 1339, 8540, 6087, 10986, 733, 4324, 10867, 3457, 22041, 24577, 3390, 19516, 14188, 16278, 6032, 6115, 11811, 21938, 4042, 22428, 6529, 25516, 18135, 7719, 15890, 1463, 14436, 10022, 23616, 2106, 5571, 20330, 10918, 7204, 19916, 21409, 5290, 6644, 480, 24046, 10957, 17802, 10495, 15664, 18463, 12157, 5708, 13284, 9172, 23840, 3427, 19809, 3131, 2551, 17716, 7567, 6421, 11991, 21735, 23490, 2756, 12537, 10131, 13118, 16497, 8899, 19265, 4812, 5864, 1245, 14178, 8063, 23098, 21522, 22053, 19322, 7435, 15903, 16267, 11074, 1164, 1185, 9337, 21271, 14969, 6058, 8679, 7320, 25493, 13175, 12107, 18912, 171, 24862, 7985, 7954, 2304, 5651, 3984, 2145, 22574, 10780, 17013, 24801, 5661, 8137, 24940, 7451, 1062, 6652, 21343, 23663, 4486, 7047, 2090, 1961, 22544, 11247, 6878, 5646, 21619, 4058, 6041, 12222, 371, 3735, 4565, 24832, 11592, 5156, 11853, 24627, 6141, 23812, 13986, 25333, 20106, 3882, 21843, 11091, 22450, 16804, 11036, 5590, 19330, 8589, 25452, 2916, 5649, 16902, 4526, 3867, 7016, 4704, 11742, 1370, 7407, 11773, 12182, 12470, 2537, 394, 18012, 11809, 9847, 18286, 4589, 4732, 20828, 11612, 5712, 4262, 18567, 13987, 11965, 4129, 18455, 7995, 4838, 7970, 22399, 3647, 11526, 5841, 13537, 2685, 20800, 11794, 2958, 19753, 9548, 29, 2663, 10080, 22738, 24324, 22456, 2718, 19502, 7384, 10085, 286, 10712, 17016, 14314, 1583, 11422, 12411, 13835, 14538, 3633, 4829, 11632, 24734, 24261, 9813, 8592, 9692, 13867, 25423, 16988, 11534, 12518, 24552, 22851, 6894, 478, 12289, 9936, 10688, 8307, 12073, 21183, 23280, 13327, 24074, 11837, 17433, 11712, 18405, 10118, 1369, 12913, 9381, 1017, 12355, 7498, 20649, 9873, 4273, 25234, 823, 5599, 11813, 266, 6672, 7202, 3677, 23146, 16547, 4285, 2085, 1491, 7535, 16781, 22134, 7569, 4367, 7364, 24366, 2249, 3891, 24769, 16982, 7592, 13209, 22067, 23907, 727, 892, 7766, 6321, 10192, 16182, 13181, 15478, 24482, 10526, 25342, 1306, 8485, 14237, 16403, 10827, 6675, 3956, 15083, 3793, 8206, 489, 23502, 15842, 10230, 5697, 12112, 1514, 23792, 4248, 19005, 18772, 14689, 21252, 14434, 5469, 3568, 922, 20210, 988, 7810, 7341, 21643, 14316, 23914, 2783, 10665, 4576, 10376, 15838, 15603, 1625, 21894, 6123, 22919, 6438, 21426, 1224, 9672, 10768, 14118, 4826, 11498, 18776, 11850, 4316, 7863, 3790, 14261, 4323, 5101, 10859, 3204, 16545, 450, 3310, 23543, 16233, 15766, 7670, 17301, 21808, 18681, 4786, 21261, 5818, 8216, 21273, 3850, 24130, 21465, 25200, 17527, 11851, 3929, 3714, 21746, 15904, 2138, 16309, 22676, 1650, 21922, 14545, 18042, 4872, 20146, 17186, 18387, 923, 8423, 22276, 1810, 2336, 12382, 7057, 9296, 10555, 3579, 18435, 3236, 694, 10251, 1084, 15976, 22804, 5240, 24787, 16673, 11127, 10023, 6335, 25109, 5331, 18632 ]
reddit_dump_-retaliation-
[ [ "I imagine it looks like half assed behavior to people like us that have to pay hundreds for some of the stuff they so casually mess with.\n\nbut its also a different environment because when you have shelves of CPU's you worry less about throwing a mid-tier one on a motherboard you haven't used in a year and was free, and zip tying a random chunk of aluminum to it to see if it cools well enough not to cook.\n\nthink of how you might treat your work copier, or that cook top, or whatever equipment you have at your work that isn't yours. Its easier to fall into a habit of not caring when you know you can just grab another one off the shelf, and you didn't pay for them, and nobody is going to care if you break it.\n\nI work at a semi truck shop. we'll buy $5k turbo's and $1k install kits, parts well into the thousands, and we'll just toss them around, rip open the boxes to play with them, and buy things \"just in case\" without a though. I didn't pay for it, and theres 12 more on the shelf, and I'll sell 3 today, if something breaks, nobody cares because we're just desensitized to it.\n\nthe funny thing is I'll order $100's of thousands of dollars in stuff in a day for a customers truck. Then I get off work and go to buy something for myself and I immediately become the cheapest bastard you've ever had to deal with, I'll spend $2k on a customers rad, then go to get one myself and be all \"$50 for a radiator!? thats highway robbery!\"", "217" ], [ "Maybe you get kicked all the time cuz you sound kind of like an asshole. I mean I got that feeling straight from the get go with the \"hipster, soy latte\" line, but the rest of the post shit talking anyone that doesn't think like you do and acting mightier than thou, kind of solidified it. \n\nPeople didn't like the lack of base building because the creators had been spouting off about how \"we're going back to the basics of DOW1\" and \"we want to bring back the gameplay of the first one\" and \"we're really trying to channel the feeling of the first game after the departure of the second game\"\n\nThey dug their own grave with it. They amped everyone up who enjoys base building RTS games, and then had a severely lacklustre base building experience. Coupled with a badly balanced game, that cut tonnes of features and content. \n\nJust because you like a click fest MOBA experience, doesn't mean everyone does. It's hardly a good strategy game, when there's only one strategy to play. And a good MOBA game employs that too, DOW3 doesn't, there's one way to play each race and no amount of skill in the game can surmount the way the developers want you to play that race and it's rock, paper, scissors play style. In SC you can turtle with zerg and rush with protoss if you're good enough. You couldnt do that in DOW3 at launch, although I've heard they've fixed some of the balancing later, that doesn't save a game 8 months after launch.\n\nThe players didn't like it, the reviewers didn't like it, and in the end even the developers didn't like it. It's hard to want to get better at a game when the developers announce that all future DLC is cancelled and updates will cease after a year when the games only been out for 2-3 months. They announced they were completely abandoning it almost immediately after release. Hard to have a decent user base after that.\n\nJust because you like it and I like it, doesn't make it a good game, and it doesn't mean anyone who dislikes it is wrong. I don't think it was the hipsters that killed it, it was the developers and they knew it right from release. The only soy boy here is the one whining 3yrs after the release of a game about \"why don't people like what I like, they all suck because my taste is impeccable, so anyone that doesn't like what I like is weak\". grow up.", "896" ], [ "The problem is, why pay twice as much for a driver that knows how to properly drive a semi with a stick, when you can pay $5k extra on the truck and then pay a driver that can only drive an auto half as much per hour and throw him behind the wheel and pay 1/10th of the cost in upkeep on the transmission to boot and better fuel mileage on top. \n\nThat lower wage and lower cost of ownership coupled with the mileage benefit, pay for the increased up front cost pretty quickly.\n\nThe crummy driver problem is basically a non-issue since there's always another driver out there who's good enough to not get in an accident, but crummy enough to work for cheap and drive your auto. and if you can't find one, you can make one in 7 weeks because there's always someone out there who dropped out of high school with no family to tie them down, or just moved to this country and wants to make above minimum wage with minimal training and doesn't mind driving all day. \n\nNot saying it's right, but I work at a semi truck dealership, and I've been around enough company owners who do this math in my office to know this is the way they think. They don't give 2 shits that 1/5 drivers that come into the service center can't back up their own truck properly. Because the owner of the company feels no shame about the fact that drivers regularly show up asking us to back up their truck for them, or ask for us to get their btrain out of our parking lot because they're too dumb to read the 4' sign saying they won't be able to get through. As long as the delivery payments keep coming in, and profits exceed expenditures, the owner doesn't care.\n\nIt sucks and I wish a good driver was valued more, bad semi truck drivers, and the owners that employ them are the bane of my fucking existence.", "257" ], [ "Because the damage caused by the bump with proper bumpers is basically non existent. It's like asking why spilt fire wood with an axe when you could buy a tablesaw, measure it and cut it perfectly in half.\n\nBecause the tablesaw might be precise, but precision has no measureable benefit for the application of fire wood, and the axe is precise enough in the hands of a skilled worker, and chopping with an axe is fast, cheap, and available pretty much everywhere.", "696" ], [ "It wasn't like 1 or 2 though. It was another complete redesign/departure of the game genre and then slapped the name DOW on it calling it a sequel despite the only thing being in common was it being Warhammer 40k.\n\n1 was a a traditional style base builder RTS\n\n2 was a COH style, squad based RTS\n\n3 was a MOBA styled APM based strategy.\n\nIf they wanted to make 3 completely different games, why call them sequels? Tonnes of people complained when they went to a squad based combat model in 2 as well. It was one of the main reasons it wasn't well received either. At least with 2 though, they had the excuse that they were avoiding going up against SC2 as a traditional RTS since they knew the releases would be close together and they knew they would never be able to compete against SC2's built in user base. Plus they at least did a semi decent job of making a squad based RTS. So the people that like a squad based combat saved it from being a complete failure. \n\nDow3 was another complete departure when they made it like a MOBA. They only wanted a MOBA because they were getting popular at the time and they wanted to try their hand at wedging into the competitive play scene. except their want to add in base building to appease those that wanted to go back to #1 style play made it a shitty MOBA. And despite the industry wanting to act like traditional RTS players and MOBA players are the same user base just because the MOBA was born from the traditional RTS game of WC3, they really aren't the same people most of the time.\n\nNot to mention just the simple mistakes they made at release like bad balancing, lack of features, lack of content etc. And then the nail in the coffin, when they announced like 2-3 months after release that they were cancelling all plans for DLC, additional races, and updates past the first year, and your game isn't going to do well.", "896" ], [ "> 2 wasn't like 1, ergo it's a complete redesign with the DoW name \"slapped on\" by your logic.\n\nCorrect, hence why I stated that it was a squad based strategy, and not a traditional based strategy, none of the titles in the series have much in common other than Warhammer and a name. I listed them all out with pointing out the different genres that inspired them for a reason. Specifically to point out how none of them are really attached to one another. \n\n > MOBA MOBA MOBA drones the meme... tell me, have you ever actually looked up the definition of \"MOBA\"?\n\nIt's almost like there's a reason I never blatantly called it a MOBA. It's almost like there's a reason there are always caveats before I draw a similarity. Notice how I say \"a MOBA styled APM based RTS\" and not just a MOBA. In fact I called it a shitty MOBA because of the addition of non-MOBA mechanics.\n\n > Speaking of DoW2, your list of \"simple mistakes they made at release\" applies just as hard to that, \n\nYeah, no shit, that's why I pointed out that DOW2 suffered upon release as well. It was just better at being a squad based game and better at appealing to the fans of that genre, than DOW3 did of emulating a MOBA and appealing to the MOBA fans.", "250" ], [ "You say that like it's an accomplishment. democrats make up the majority of the American country. Did you forget that <PERSON> never even won the popular vote? Majority of the world is more liberal than even the democrats of America so its no wonder things like this end up at the top. The republicans have been the minority imposing their will on the majority from the very beginning of <PERSON> presidency.", "313" ], [ "I'm still not convinced <PERSON> is coming back in a seriously meaningful way. She might pop up in a semi-comedic way, they're in a fight, she happens to be waiting at a bus stop nearby, pop's someone and then with an eye roll wanders off. That type of deal.\n\nbut with how quickly they used up lamplighter, I have a hard time believing that shes going to be pivotal since they spent less time with her than they did with lamplighter.\n\nI don't think shes going to be some season ender lynchpin anyway", "311" ], [ "yeah, I'm not sure why so many people are so obsessed with <PERSON> and believe so certainly that shes coming back in a meaningful way.\n\nI'm pretty sure she's just a one off/two off character. they might bring her back for a semi-comedic cameo, but I highly doubt shes going to be a seriously pivotal character in any way.\n\npretty sure her getting in that car was meant to be her \"ride off into the sunset\" moment.", "807" ], [ "yes and no, You lose out in power with them and they shift \"funny\" compared to pretty much any other engine (mostly because of the lost power) so you end up having to shift them earlier in the power range than what you're used to.\n\nits like learning to drive all over again, except worse because you've already made the habit of when to shift that matches pretty much every other engine on the market.\n\nyou can definitely tell that theres a power difference when the load is heavy.\n\nthat said, statistically they actually do have longer uptime hours and a longer lifespan on the road both between rebuilds and overall. I think its mostly because with the paccars if something goes wrong they might leave you on the side of the road but it'll be repairable, where the cummins have a tendency to blow the fuck up or eat themselves from the inside out haha.", "726" ], [ "dunno why everyone is being so critical of you, you're ***partially*** right.\n\nfirst you have to differentiate the crude oil we pull up from a well, and the bitumen tar we pull from the sands.\n\na significant portion of our crude oil is refined into gasoline and other products within canada. \n\nvery little of our bitumen however, which these days is the bulk of our oil production, from the tar sands is refined into gasoline in canada. In fact, very little of it is refined ***at all*** in Canada. \n\nIts one of the primary criticisms of the pipeline which will be for bitumen. There aren't many countries *globally* with the facilities, or want, to refine bitumen tar. Its extremely expensive, difficult, and dirty to refine. The countries with the capability to refine it, have more than enough of it themselves. and there is more than enough crude well oil being put onto the market to make refining bitumen a very unattractive option.", "866" ], [ "I feel the same way. I was originally looking for a long throw myself, but it was such a good deal I couldn't say no. I figured even if the bulb only lasted one day it was still worth it. It ended up lasting, I think it was 450hrs before it went though. Hopefully the third bulb arrives soon it died 6 days ago, and the bulb was supposed to be here 4 days ago.", "333" ], [ "Holy shit I hope so. Because of covid my work split us into 2 shifts, 3 days on 12hrs a day then 4 days off.\n\nThe amount my life has Improved is immeasurable. The 12hrs is a little much, so I would be happy splitting the difference and going to 4x 10's a week. And if I could do 4x 8's I could deal.\n\nThe extra time off is great, working 2.5x's the amount of time you have off is a ridiculously disgusting work - life ratio that you only notice how bad it is once you're outside of it.", "975" ], [ "I think we all know, thats exactly what would happen. On Monday they'd go on the news and send out tweets about how important the separation between church and state is.\n\nthen on Tuesday they would be telling everyone about how its against gods will to swear the oath of office on anything but a bible, homosexuality is wrong because it says so in the bible.\n\nThey'd fuck their mister on Wednesday.\n\nthen drive their daughter for an abortion on Thursday.\n\nThen campaign against abortion on Friday.", "754" ], [ "I'm surprised I don't see it here when I ctrl+F\n\nbut the fermi paradox.\n\nbasically a scientific theory about life outside our earth that states (paraphrased and dumbed down)\n\nwe're either rare, first, or fucked.\n\nso when it comes to life in the universe, we haven't found any signs of it. Despite the billions of stars and planets in just our galaxy and the billions of years its all existed allowing a civilization to flourish we see nothing out there. Which means there must be some sort of barrier that keeps it from being super common. This barrier is referred to as \"the great filter\". So we need to place ourselves on the scale of before or after this \"filter\"\n\nSo this means either we're rare: complex life, or at least the ability to reach beyond your own system is super rare and we very well might be alone in the universe or practically so via inability to reach beyond. Either that or its so sparse we may never see another life form. We're past the barrier that gatekeeps complex life. A scary proposition by itself, but not the worst.\n\nwe're first: a variation on rare, but that we're just the first ones to get here, maybe thats because there is no filter and theres a lot of life growing in the galaxy, maybe there is and just no life has made it there yet. This one is a bit of a mixed bag, again could be worse, but who knows what kind of life we might encounter in the future, and why we haven't seen anything from anything else.\n\nwe're fucked: there is a great filter and its ahead of us. Something keeps complex life from ever reaching the stars or leaving its planet. Something is coming and its going to wipe our life from the face of the galaxy., or at least keep us contained to our system.\n\nif we find bacteria or signs of previous life on another planet ***especially*** within our solar system, it very well could be the worst news humanity could ever hear. because that means its common enough to start on not one, but two planets in just a single system. which would mean we're common, and something is coming that stops us from reaching beyond.", "366" ], [ "Because you and them are focusing on the wrong part of the statement. \n\nIt's not the fact that they're paying you in cash vs other method, it's the fact that they have it ***now***, no running to the ATM, no \"I'll pick up tomorrow\" and then ghosting, no haggling further or showing up with less money than they agreed, and no time to rethink and change their mind or \"can you hold it for me\"\n\nBasically \"no bullshit, here's the offer\"\n\nThe problem is they think that deserves like a 50% discount. And half the time they say that then tell you \"alright I'll just have to run to the ATM and I'll meet you\" (well then I guess you *don't* have cash in hand now do you?) \n\nI'll take someone \"cash in hand\" for a small portion less than the guy who \"I get paid on Friday and we can meet on Saturday?\"", "879" ], [ "last I saw it posted, that was one of the prevailing theories: lack of available energy sources. The ones you have easy access to when your civilization is young destroy your planet, and the ones required to do it safely aren't accessible to early enough civilization to be effective. \n\nits also one of the \"rare\" theories, that our access to oil is special to our planet. Most civilizations in the galaxy don't have the dead previous life cycles that formed oil to make it available to them. and there aren't any other sources of such concentrated energy available to advance the civilization.", "366" ], [ "you're assuming the ability of complex thought comes with the inherent ability to feel.\n\nhe could see them, know what happened and feel absolutely nothing, like a computer would while digesting information.\n\nits possible the mind stone is what gave him the ability to feel emotion. without it, hes just a hollow shell with visions memories.\n\nor it could be its just going to take time for him to digest it all and form those connections with what hes \"seeing\" in his head.", "926" ], [ "yeah, the fanboys are out in full force after the finale downvoting anything critical of the show.\n\nI made a comment stating that after the finale and finally knowing what story the series was trying to tell/set up, I felt even stronger that it should have been a single season drop, and it now made me feel even more that <PERSON> is just purposely embracing the weekly release schedule in order to keep people subscribed to the service. I just didn't feel like it had enough of a story to tell, and there were no real surprises or anything to warrant the weekly schedule release combined with the short episodes , even if I did enjoy the series as a whole, I just felt like it didn't warrant it in the same way that shows like the boys, ST:Discovery ,or mando do.\n\nnobody even had an opinion, I just got comments about how I'm an idiot, and I should get fucked, etc. I was at -156 without a single comment trying to discuss it before I just deleted the comment because obviously nobody had an opinion they just didn't like anyone being critical of the series.", "513" ], [ "after living here for the past 6ish years, I'm astonished at how many albertans are ***so*** supportive of the oil industry and incredibly hardline that its the only industry alberta is capable of having\n\nwhile simultaneously having absolutely ***no*** idea as to how the industry actually functions, its capabilities, or even whats good or bad for it.\n\nlike the fact that we have literally one bitumen refinery in the entire country. Refining bitumen requires a coker unit. One of the most expensive additions a refinery can build.\n\nthe largest quantity of coke units is in america, and we're already exporting as much as they want because they have their own tar sands, and they're expanding them so their demand to buy outside is going to continue to shrink. nobody else wants our tar sands oil really. and pipelines to ship it over seas have been proven time and again to be pointless. Its the reason the oil companies themselves decided that no pipeline would ever reach ROI, and there was no point in building one.\n\ncapacity to ship doesn't make people want to buy it. Its like thinking if you have enough beanie babies to sell its going to make more people want them.", "866" ], [ "talk to your landlord and change the locks. \n\nSome people will say \"shes been there long enough she has squatters rights so you have to evict her\"\n\nwell sure that might *legally* be true, but what do you think the chances are of her actually exercising that situation? and what do you lose if she does? This is one of those, \"its better to ask for forgiveness than permission\" situations. \n\nTell her \"at the end of the month I'm changing the locks\" and fucking do it.", "790" ], [ "but what is she going to do if <PERSON> doesn't?\n\nhonestly to me this is one of those \"better to ask forgiveness than permission\" situations to me.\n\nif someone has to go through the legal process, let her be the one to do it, not <PERSON>\n\nif he doesn't own the property, theres basically no repercussions to <PERSON> just going to the landlord, telling him someone has keys that shouldn't and asking the locks to be changed. Even if she goes to court and wins, OP has very little to lose.\n\nI mean I fully agree that she probably *does* have squatters rights by this point, but chances are she knows what shes doing is wrong and if he just tell her \"I'm changing the locks at the end of the month\" and clears it with the landlord and does it, she'll just go away to find somewhere else to crash.\n\nhell if worse comes to worst, just move, tell your landlord you're cancelling your lease.\n\nbut going through a formal eviction with someone thats not even on the lease is honestly a waste of time, it can take 3-6 months to go through and even then they could just stay. I speak from a similar experience (ex not wanting to leave after a break-up) eventually I talked with my landlord, moved my lease to a different apartment one floor up and just moved my shit.", "790" ], [ "when you hear hoofbeats think horses not zebras.\n\nshes only been there for 1.5 months and hasn't paid any rent. This would have to be a pretty extraordinary circumstance if shes getting any mail delivered or has made any official paperwork saying she lives there. You would also have to get a pretty insane judge to rule in her favour saying she lives there. Plus she would have to have the money time and personal drive to take off work, take time out of her day and fill out the official paperwork to start a claim and small claims you can't sue for time lost or legal fees.\n\nof which there ***are*** fees, anyone whos ever actually gone through small claims will tell you it still costs almost $650 to file the paperwork and for the court fees to be heard, and it takes quite awhile to get it all put through, and since she has no legal paperwork stating she lives there, the cops won't let her stay there. If she has a lease and the landlord is evicting based off of non payment, then yes the cops will let them stay there and you have to prove that they can't. However if they have no paperwork to show, then she is kicked out until she can prove that she has a right to stay there, and *thats* where the hundreds to thousands come in, its for the money and frustration required to stay somewhere else in between and most people once they've found a new place won't bother going after their old place. Its the same situation as when landlords take the damage deposit's of the 19yr olds that move out with no cause, *could* they go back and sue in small claims, sure, but will they? 95% of them wont.\n\nyour advice sounds nice on paper, but it assumes she has started getting mail there within 1.5 months, which isn't even enough time to switch most paperworks over, assumes a judge ruling in her favour, assumes she has the time and money to go through the court, assumes she even has the drive to actually do it.\n\nmy advice assumes she gets kicked out screams \"FUCK YOU!\" at OP and just finds somewhere else to stay/goes back home to live wherever she was before.\n\nwhich do you honestly think is more likely?", "790" ], [ "this isn't news\n\n I mean although you picked awful examples, and continue to cherry pick posts that fit your narrative in the comments. Everyone knows a lot of the posts end up with a sexist slant in one way or another. \n\nits a pretty common thing in this sub for people to make shitposts the day of or the day after a very one sided post where it turns the tables and gets a completely opposite reaction from the sub simply because the genders are swapped. It's almost a meme at this point, if you daily the sub for any amount of time you'll see it probably once a day. Especially on high comment posts with a lot of back and forth and arguing going on in the comments, the next day you'll usually see a post thats eerily similar with gender swapped and it ***will*** get a very different reaction.\n\nbut are you really surprised? and do you really expect anything to change? how could you even possibly change it? men and women have different points of view, and depending on the wording of the post you'll get very different reactions from the commenters, thats just reddit.", "247" ], [ "who cares if its *technically* cheating or not? \n\nyou don't need our, or anyone elses approval to be hurt enough to end it for whatever reasons you want. \n\nyou obviously have a problem with this and thats enough, and for good reason in my opinion, you're right if she didn't think it was problem she wouldn't have hidden it. Of course ***he*** doesn't think its cheating, why would you even ask the guy shes cheating on you with? Hes getting his rocks off to your girlfriend and wants to keep doing it, of course he's going to say whatever it takes to keep it going, and she *helping* him get his rocks off.\n\nand also why are you only saying ***his*** response? what did your ***girlfriend*** have to say on the matter?\n\nalthough, what does it matter? you know and we know this is cheating and wrong. Dump her or she'll just continue doing this behind your back since its pretty obvious she wants to continue doing it too, and shes already been talking to him about lying to you about it.", "901" ], [ "I concur with /u/SuperGRB what (s)he has posted is the best course of action.\n\nit sounds like shes been giving the stock response to people up until this point, but when you *actually* went out and bought a ring it made it real to her and she had to honestly ask herself if she could marry you, and the answer was \"no\".\n\nthings will continue to get worse from this point on unless you follow /u/SuperGRB 's advice and hope that the reality of \"he might leave me\" hopefully makes her take stock and snaps her out of it to \"I can't imagine living without him\" and maybe changes her mind.\n\nbut as of right now she reached the crucible and it went poorly for you.", "657" ], [ "the only thing you should do is stop calling guys \"chads\" it makes you sound like an incel, neckbeard.\n\nother than that you should do absolutely nothing, shes dating someone, thats the end of it, you don't want to be the guy trying to encourage her to cheat, nobody likes that guy.\n\nyou need to decide, are you friends with her because you enjoy her company as a friend? or are you friends with her because you're awkwardly hoping she dumps her bf and starts loving you randomly.\n\none means you're a guy with a female friend who wants the best for her and you don't like her bf because hes genuinely a douche, although get used to that, plenty of your friends will date shitty people over the years, you just have to walk the line between voicing your opinions and being a preachy asshole since people are going to live their lives. The other makes you that creepy satellite guy that will eventually realize that shes just not into you then get angry and take it out on her as if she did something wrong by not being attracted to you.", "657" ], [ "if it makes you uncomfortable then thats, that. If she agreed to not do it again, would you be ok with that and be able to move on? is that something she offered? \n\nif this is something you just blatantly disagree on, she won't promise to not do it again, and for you, her showing her friends, guys and girls, her bare breasts is a deal breaker, then the math is simple.\n\nif you can live with this happening this one time since you never talked about it before, and shes willing to not do it again, then forgive her, never bring it up again, and move on and deal with it if it happens again.\n\nfor me personally, I *wouldn't* care if my gf did it with me there as long as she asked if I was ok with it first. There are some people I'd be ok with her doing it around and some who I wouldn't. However if I wasn't around, especially in the semi-romantic setting of a vacation in Spain, I would *not* be ok with it either.\n\nif you're just wondering for a 3rd opinion of \"is this objectively controlling and crazy\" I would say no.\n\nedit: I just figured I'd point out, *she* doesn't get to **tell** you what you have to be comfortable with, even if shes ok with you being nude around other people, that doesn't mean that you **have** to be ok with her being nude around other people. You're allowed to have different opinions about things.\n\nthe best way to approach it if shes saying its not a big deal to her is to just lay it out \"ok, I understand its not a big deal to you, but its a big deal *to me*, obviously I'm not convinced to your way of thinking, so do I matter enough to you, for you to stop doing it anyway, despite the fact that you don't think its a big deal.\" because thats really the question here if you can't both find a compromise. Most relationship disagreements boil down to that, can you compromise? if you can't is this something they're willing to change for you despite their different point of view? if they don't change for you is this something that you're willing to bite your tongue about and move past without stewing on it/waiting for it to boil over again later?", "657" ], [ "break up with him and don't go on the trip if he's going to go.\n\n It sucks that you're shooting down your friend trip for something thats nobody's fault, but its shitty to keep staying with him when you know you're done and want to break up.\n\nYou *could* go on the trip, and for the record ***you have absolutely every right to go if you want to*** I wan't that clear. \n\nhowever if you break up with him and go, then it will make it super awkward for everyone involved, plus theres always the chance that you or him will hook up with someone on the trip, and do you really want to put him through that right after dumping him, and do you really want to see that if you end up on the opposite end. The only other option is that *he* then decides to not go out of heartbreak and not wanting to be there during that stage.\n\nagain you have every right to go, and I wouldn't fault you if you went, however if you want to be kind, let him go and hopefully a little friend time helps heal his broken heart.", "206" ], [ "is this something that hes agreed to not do? If he refuses to stop following pornstars on reddit/twitter is that a dealbreaker for you?\n\nif this is something you can't agree on and its a deal breaker for you then dump him. If this is something you can get past and deal with then keep an eye on it to make sure its not excessive, but following a handful of pornstars on twitter I don't think is that crazy, the quantity that he follows, to me, is less important than the amount of time he spends looking at it. I have probably a couple hundred NSFW subs added on my reddit, but 99% of the time I have my app set to filter out NSFW posts and the amount of subs is only that high because I'm a daily redditor for the past 6yrs. So despite the large quantity of subs I only look at those subs *maybe* once every 3ish weeks. So if anyone thinks hes a sex/porn addict I think that very much so depends on how much time hes spending looking at it.\n\nconsidering you've pointed out it makes you uncomfortable, and hes sending/showing you posts of theirs, I think its pretty assholish behaviour. So the disrespect to me is deal breaker territory more than the porn.", "518" ], [ "its pretty human to feel a little jealous about it, but you should be keeping it to yourself and trying to squash that jealousy because you have no real right to feel that way.\n\nwhen children throw away a toy, sometimes they still don't want anyone to play with it. Thats what you're doing right now, its immature. \n\ndon't beat yourself up over it, but learn to get over it because really its none of your business who he dates or how soon now. Plus he's only talking to someone, even if they were fucking it would be fine, but talking to someone and getting friendly isn't anything you should be concerning yourself with.\n\nedit: also, for the record, a month isn't even that long to start getting back into dating. So no, this is super normal.", "591" ], [ "well if its public knowledge, like if you're subbed to him, you can see what hes subbed to. Then I wouldn't call it \"snooping\" its public knowledge. However if you're going onto his phone and logging into his account to see it then thats invasive and you should stop that. \n\nthats said, if its just something that annoys you but you think you can get over it, great. personally by the fact that you made this post, it sounds like its something thats going to eat at you and you'll always be wondering if hes looking at pornographic stuff in your presence. In which case it should be squashed, if its somewhere in between you get to play the compromise dance.\n\napproach it from the stance that you understand he's mostly doing it for the ridiculous stuff, but the amount makes you uncomfortable . Could he maybe create a seperate account for it that he only uses when he needs that type of stuff? would keeping it to a particular number of pornstars make it alright for you? is there a \"happy medium\" you two could maybe find together that would ease your mind about it and let you both feel like you've gotten a victory here?", "518" ], [ "really? and just keep dating and stringing along someone that she knows she wants to break up with, just to make it less awkward for herself?\n\npersonally I would consider that pretty selfish. Theres never a *good* time to break up with someone, and waiting like that just so that she can go on her trip without feeling awkward about it I don't think is right.", "657" ], [ "what did you *expect* from him after saying that?\n\nif my SO said that to me I would assume theres a *reason* shes bringing it up until she told me otherwise. I get quite a bit of anxiety sometimes as well, and sometimes theres no real \"source\" for it.\n\nbut even with me getting random anxiety, my *first* response would be to be asking, am I doing something to cause this that I need to stop? is there something I can do to help this and she wants me to do it? Then finally it would be, Does she just want me to acknowledge the anxiety so that I know?\n\nbut considering the coming nuptials, yes this would make me very worried if we were about to get married and out of nowhere my fiance said \"I'm anxious\" without giving me any clear indication as to ***why*** she was anxious.\n\nthat situation would make ***me*** anxious. I would start wondering if she was getting cold feet, is she not telling me something, is she hiding something etc. etc. etc.\n\nif theres no source you should be saying so \"I have no idea, I just feel like my heart is trying to rip out of my chest\"", "52" ], [ "just ask it as a question \"ok X so we're meeting at Y place for dinner right? ok and you said we're going to play some games afterwards? So how are we getting to **your** place afterwards?\"\n\nplay dumb and word it like a question that you either don't know where this place is that you're all going to play games, or that you thought it was her place since she never asked you.\n\nif she tries to do something like \"oh I thought it would be fine to go to your place afterwards\" its now simple to just say \"oh, sorry no I'm not really cool with that\" \n\nno excuses, no debates, just \"sorry, but no\"", "432" ], [ "ooof yeah you stepped in shit there. Thats not being honest, thats being immature. If you're only thinking of the superficial then she has every right to start doubting your relationship.\n\nA) if you're only worried about the physical attractiveness of your partner when you're thinking of the sexual attraction, you have some growing up to do, everyones body breaks down over time, if you can't adjust to that reality, I would doubt the long term viability of the relationship too.\n\nB) you took a major shot at her ego there, if your gf thought you had a small dick, would you appreciate the \"honesty\" of her telling you that? especially since its not really something you could change or avoid?\n\ndude..... you have some making up to do, and some self reflection, either that or you need to break it off and do some growing up before you start talking marriage and children with women.", "657" ], [ "> Did you not read the entire thing?\n\nif you're going to ask dumb questions in such an aggressive manner, don't be surprised when people act aggressively back towards you. I can read, I can also deal well with people and have an ounce of intuition as to how to deal with others. obviously you can't say the same.\n\nI also gave a reasoned and mature response to <PERSON>, instead of just crying \"fuckin women and their loaded questions!\" of which this most certainly is not. Its a valid body concern for plenty of women whether their partner will still be attracted to them afterwards.\n\nIts easy to call it a \"loaded question\" and claim \"oh if you say no she'll just say you're lying!\" well yeah, if all you say is \"yes of course\" and if you ***are*** lying then she'll be right to say so. but maturing enough to understand that bodies change and be sexually attracted to a person anyways takes a maturity you obviously don't have at your age.", "971" ], [ "I mean, the entire debate of lane splitting aside, thats not how proof works. If you make a claim, and they ask you to provide proof of said claim, you don't get to then say \"well prove me wrong\". nobody can prove a negative, and as well you don't get make claims and then because they don't have proof to the contrary call yourself right.", "977" ], [ "yeah I remember this, the shitty thing is, thats exactly what happened. This guy was douche all through this interaction, and was a douche afterwards flat out telling people that nothing was going to happen to him because hes rich and blah blah blah, and the court entirely let him off with a slap on the wrist and a finger wag of \"don't do that again\" just like he said and they completely dropped the charges against him. It was infuriating", "98" ], [ "> ***\"I mean, the entire debate of lane splitting aside,\"***\n\nif you're wanting to debate the merits of lane splitting, I don't care. you're commenting on the wrong person, I was never involved with the debate. I have no proof in either direction.\n\nI was commenting on the fact that you said\n\n/u/Goodspot \n\n > San Francisco medic here, splitting is for sure safer than sitting in rush hour traffic if done SMARTLY.\n\n\nto which /u/instenzHD wrote\n\n > No lane splitting is not safer and there is no data to back your claims up.\n\nand your response of\n\n/u/Goodspot \n\n > Provide data to prove me wrong.\n\nall I'm saying is, thats not how proof works, you don't get to make a claim and when someone asks for data or proof of that claim, then tell them they have to prove you wrong, otherwise that makes you right.\n\nwhether you actually ***are*** right or not, I don't really care, but if your definition of being right is making claims and if nobody can prove you wrong, that must make you right, is false and doesn't make any sense.", "523" ], [ "so the US court system relies on people showing up to say \"I didn't do it!\" ? no. the court(you) makes a claim \"You did this\" and the accused(/u/instenzHD) says \"Prove that I did\" and then the court(you) shows their proof.\n\none makes a claim, the other challenges and asks for proof, and the one that starts it backs that claim up with said proof.\n\n\nin this situation you made a claim, he challenged it, but when you should have provided proof, you said \"prove me wrong\"", "12" ], [ "Well considering I've had to repeat to you that \"I'm not talking about lane splitting\" multiple times, that I had to teach you how legal charges work in the US legal system (despite me not even being a US citizen, and *you* bringing it up), and the fact that you thought it was a valid line of argument to basically say, No you!, when asked for proof about his claims, coupled with your inability to just admit you are wrong about something, and resorting to smart ass comments and attempts to derail the conversation when you're backed into a corner about being wrong\n\nThen I'd say I've been acting a lot more intelligently, and making a lot more coherent responses than you have.", "730" ], [ "JC is fun, especially 3 as a sandbox \"blow everything up\" kind of game just like Mercs. \n\nbut it got repetitive pretty fast, by about 3/4 of the way through I was playing just so I could get some of the final weapons and upgrades.\n\nplus it gets *really* annoying how guys spawn anywhere you're not looking. You'll clear a rooftop and be having a blast blowing everything up and sniping guys then you get shot up by 3 guys that spawned directly behind you on top of an empty 6 story building. Or a helicopter that spawned directly behind you and fucked you up before you even realized you were being shot.", "148" ], [ "Yeah, at 31 from what I've gathered talking to those older than me and my peers that are the same age:\n\nat some point between 18-25 you stop mentally aging yourself anymore. If you talk to a 60yr old, chances are their mindset internally is pretty close to when they were in that age range. They still think, internally, that they're that age. Sure you get more experience with stuff, you still learn things, intellectually you know how old you are, but in your head you're not any older in your mental self image.\n\nI have a career, I own a house, I'm doing all the things that an adult does. but when asked I would still say I'm a \"guy\" not a \"man\" because I feel like I'm 20 still. \n\nI get moments of feeling like an adult, but thats it. Sometimes I'll be walking back to the garage to grab something, I'll step out of the house, look around, and realize \"this is mine\" o_O \"I have a career, a house, multiple cars, people that depend on me, I call my parents every week or two to just to check in, I'm fixing the furnace of my house on my weekend and doing chores without anyone even telling me to do it or being disappointed in me if I don't, I do what I want, when I want. holy shit do I feel like an actual adult in this moment, I finally made it\"\n\nthen the moment passes, I go back to the chores I'm taking care of before, and I end my night with a joint and watching the new episode of star trek or something while eating a bowl of archduke chocula cereal and playing video games until 2am feeling like I'm 20 again.....", "881" ], [ "he could have if he started braking when it turned yellow like he was supposed to. But as someone that has driven a loaded set just like it. He definitely decided when it was stale green \"fuck it, I'm going through, they'll stop for me\". Even fully loaded theres no light that you can't stop for if you're paying attention and the roads are clear. Its not exactly -20c and snowing, and that wasn't exactly the most loaded down set either, judging from the suspension ride height, I'd guess he was empty there. Especially since he's driving in the city so he shouldn't be going over 65.\n\nand the red car behind him *certainly* could have stopped.\n\ntrucks have longer stopping distances and times, but if a truck couldn't stop in the time it takes for a light to change, while driving city speeds, on a dry road, then it would have become a much bigger problem a long time ago before now.", "523" ], [ "Looks like they're just anodized aluminum (probably titanium actually for its natural antimicrobial qualities) . Anodizing is used as a durable coating to resist scratching and eliminate oxidation. Think of it like powder coating or painting. Except paint or powder coat can eventually flake off over time and wear off. But anodization, electrolyticaly oxidizes the surface of the material past what it can do in regular atmosphere. This means it's not just a layer on top, it's the metal itself has been changed.", "304" ], [ "there are plenty of multimeters out there with a dedicated audible continuity function, but plenty of the cheap ones that majority of people have don't.\n\nI worked at a couple different hardware stores for ~8yrs up until about 4yrs ago, and I had never seen a multimeter with audible continuity function until I started working in automotive and saw some of the nice FLUKE ones. I had seen light up or beeping continuity testers as a separate tool, but never combined until I saw some nice ones.\n\ngenerally if you are checking for continuity with a multimeter, you use the \"resistance\" function (ohms or Ω)", "672" ], [ "I'll start with: unplug everything first! Even in unplugged electronics you can get nasty shocks from charged capacitors. but safety first, unplug it, if possible leave it for a few hours before working on it or wait for as much to discharge as possible. If you don't know what it is or how it works, learn before poking at it, or don't touch it at all!\n\nso: generally if you are checking for continuity with a multimeter, (assuming one without audible continuity function, as most cheap ones do not have this) you use the \"resistance\" function (ohms or Ω).\n\nso if its a dial type, and you are expecting no resistance (as most fuses, wires, etc should be unless its something like a blower resistor in your car). but you will set it to its most sensitive setting which will generally be the *lowest* number. On most it is 200\n\non many this will also require you to plug your probes into the powered socket, and the black \"ground/resistance/continuity/COM\" socket.\n\nyou should be set up. your multimeter should say ***1*** when the probes are apart, and when touched together the numbers will start changing rapidly, but should be close to zero. I usually end up with something like .3 or .175.\n\n1= full resistance - aka nothing is getting through\n\n < 1 = continuity, *something* is getting through, however the higher the number the less is getting through. Its normal for even a good wire to have *some* resistance. However the lower the better.\n\nso if you touch your probes to each side of the fuse and see ***1*** on your multimeter, the fuse is blown and not allowing any electricity through it any more.", "542" ], [ "oh man, I was starting to think I was the only one who watched that show. I was so sad it was cancelled way back when. Me and my gf rewatched the whole series about 6 months ago. It probably doesn't hold up as well as I think it does, but nostalgia can give you some pretty rosy glasses.\n\nI always loved <PERSON> in that, his gigantic smile and merry demeanor pairs really well with being the devil.", "60" ], [ "Yes, in Canada our trade organization is much stricter. For example I'm a parts tech for a semi dealership. I had to go through 6 months of college schooling spread over a 3yr apprenticeship, working 1500hrs per year. I had to take 4 exams throughout, each in order to advance each year and one to pass the apprenticeship completely. If I decide I want to move provinces, I'll have to take another government test to show that my schooling is equivalent to the other provinces.\n\nThe text books I needed for my schooling are all paperback and fills 6 milk crates and in my basement.\n\nOur trade schooling is significantly more in depth than in America, we go much farther into theory. One of the techs I worked with described the difference as \"when I was a master tech in America, I knew all the important bits of an alternator, I knew how to select a replacement, all the different things to look for and how to diagnose one and what it meant. When I got my red seal in Canada, I could have designed you an alternator from the ground up, I knew both what it did and *how* it does what it does\"\n\nWith that said, I make about $47/hr as a parts tech (slightly above average). Last year I pulled in over 6 figures *after* taxes. For reference of buying power that gets you in Canada. I'm 31M with no other sources of income, I own a decent 4 bedroom house that I pay for by myself (no second income). I live a very comfortable life and would consider myself middle class on my wage alone.\n\nThe techs at my shop make $5/hr more than me, and the night shift makes $5/hr more than that.\n\nOh and trades school is *mandatory* for techs, you can't be a mechanic in Canada without going to school.", "392" ], [ "This is what I was told to do by my parents. It even saved me once from a shitty landlord. She got really angry when I crossed it out, said I would have to sign a new contract. I told her \"no I've done this on every other contract I've signed, and even ones lawyers have gone over have never mentioned it as a problem, it should be fine\" she got even angrier and really pissy about it. I got bad vibes and decided if she was going to get this pissy about something small, I didn't want to live with her as my landlord anyway and told her I would come back some other time to sign a different copy, and then just ghosted her.\n\n3 weeks later, I still hadn't found a place and needed to move by end of the month, so I called her up and decided to take the place. I was waiting for her to arrive and someone was moving out. It was mid-month and I made comment along the lines of \"smart, moving out before the end of the month, I always hate scrambling to do a move in one day right at the end.\"\n\nThe guy scoffed, and the woman with him helping him move (probably his SO) explained that the woman that rents the place is a real estate agent, and put shitty clauses in the rental agreement after you've signed it. she pulled out a photocopy of their agreement, and a copy of the one she had provided in order to kick them out. and told me they had given copies to everyone in the complex to warn them what she does. I honestly can't remember what it said exactly, stuff about maintenance requirements of tenants of the building, extra charges for usage of the communal garbage bin stuff like that. They said she was wanting a bunch of extra money from them and had been threatening to evict them, so they were leaving.\n\nit was all in the space that was left blank. I noped out and just left before she ever even got there. She called me a few minutes later and I just ignored the call and blocked her number.", "790" ], [ "to your edits:\n\nI am hyped for Dune, but I'm trying my best at keeping my expectations low. The book is one of my favourites so its difficult, but i'm trying my best to not pay attention to whats going on and forget it exists.\n\nas for Bond, WW84, and Black Widow. Even as a movie lover and a superhero movie lover.....meh.\n\nI grew up on Bond, <PERSON> I've never been a big fan of. Sure they're excellent spy movies. and even though I've never read the books, I hear its much closer to the book style Bond. However to me growing up watching Goldfinger and Thunderball. Thats the <PERSON> I'm interested in, so <PERSON> has never been great for me. and I've found them progressively more boring as time goes on.\n\nWonder Woman: I'm just not excited for it at all. The entire DC universe is kind of a write off to me. I just don't care. I've never thought of wonder woman as an especially interesting character even if I respect the significance of the character. But after watching trailers, I'm not going to be paying to see it.\n\nBlack Widow: I wasn't excited for, until I saw a couple trailers and it looks pretty interesting. I'm interested in hearing more about Black Widow's story, and its the first real advancement of the marvel universe story since endgame and I'm really curious as to where they're going to go from here. The only current characters I think I care about really are <PERSON>, and <PERSON>. Everyone else is either on their last movie, or I'm not interested.\n\nOther than that, not much on the docket that I'm interested in. Although the scarcity has gotten me watching a lot of movies I wouldn't normally watch. As well theres been a lot of good TV floating around lately doing the weekly episode drops so I still have something to watch every week. Discovery, Mandalorian, The Boys etc.", "934" ], [ "I'm from Canada in a province where theres been some major min-wage increases in the past 10ish years.\n\nfrom my experience if you're above the min wage mark, your increases will be minimal if at all. If the US is like CAN, then they aren't required to raise your wage unless its to bring above min-wage.\n\nif you're above min-wage already there really isn't any direct benefit to you personally by raising it. but there isn't really a detriment either. Someone elses gain, doesn't mean your loss.\n\nour min wage went from $7.50-$14/hr over the past years. No the cost of a burger didn't shoot up in price, and the cost of a gallon of milk didn't rise by any more than the rate it was already rising. those are boogeyman talking points from the conservative side. The cost of things is set by the market (the consumer) not by the cost of the business. As long as its a positive net income, prices won't rise unless people become able and willing to pay more for something.\n\nwhen I worked retail making 13.50 and they went from 8.50-10. There was no change to my daily life. The people who were making 8.50 had a decent change, but nobody was suddenly laid off. Our staff numbers didn't shrink. Basically nothing happened, except the people making min-wage were now a little better able to afford groceries and rent.", "466" ], [ "the whole post just reads like someone who has never been allowed to fail at anything their entire life. I'd bet mommy and daddy probably gave this guy quite the head start in life, and any time it looked like he might stumble there were always people to bail him out before anything truly went sideways.", "459" ], [ "lol, if you're working 2 jobs, 70hrs a week total, you've got $6 in your account, and you can't make rent and food at the same time, how the fuck do expect someone to up and start a landscaping company you dolt?\n\nall these people aren't in this situation because they bought a second car and got a school loan.\n\nthey're in that situation because their parents were too poor to take care of them, so they kicked them out at 16, so they couldn't finish highschool, They've been working min-wage since then and can't get out because they have no money or free time.\n\nIf you think its so easy to just create and sell music, or cartoons that you can just make a living off it just because you want to then tell that to all the starving artists. because not everyone can make a living off those things even if they've had the time to devote years of practice to it, to become truly good at it.\n\nif you start behind the 8-ball, its pretty difficult to get in front of it when you've never had the time or money to play pool before.", "941" ], [ "depends on how strong your stomach is.\n\n*disturbing warning* TLDR: > !a nuclear incident involving the irradiation of hundreds of workers, one of whom, <PERSON>, they attempted to keep alive after a *massive* dose of radiation. It was half way between medical treatment and horrible experimentation. He basically spent 3 months in the hospital under constant skin grafts, organ failures, transfusions etc. etc. basically constant medial procedures as his body basically melted on the table. The pictures are disturbing. his muscles and skin were melting off the bones while they kept him alive with numerous resuscitations over the ~85 days of hospitalization. From what I understand he was basically begging for them to just let him die.! <", "421" ], [ "well certainly with a statement being so confidently correct you have a lot of proof to back up such a statement right? May we see it? \n\nor is this going to be another one of those \"I'm going to drop this comment with a wild claim that goes against everything the news is telling me, but when asked why I believe it, I'm just going to ghost\" type of moments?\n\nbecause I get the feeling we're more likely to get a snarky comment calling all the libs dumb instead of any proof. At best maybe a single posting, but then when someone pokes a hole in it, or points out it proves nothing and why, you'll stick your head in the sand, pretend it didn't just happen and then just go make a wild claim somewhere else and start this all over again.", "977" ], [ "Taxes are not a \"buy what you want\" system, they're a buffet. You dont get to say \"I'm not paying full price because I only eat salad\".\n\nTheres always *someone* out there that doesn't think somethings important. You can't say \"well I'm not paying taxes because I don't want to pay for education when I have no kids in school\" because theres someone out there saying \"I don't own a car, why should I pay taxes for roads when I don't use them\" and you sure as shit expect that person to pay for the roads you use. Thats pretty much the entire idea of taxes, you may not use everything that they pay for personally, but society as a whole is made better by having those things, and you benefit from the society you live in being better.", "322" ], [ "for $100 CAD and an afternoon of poking about I now have my entire home running through a pfsense router, Pi hole added so nothing and nobody thats connected in my house gets ads on anything, and I set up a local VPN so all my personal devices route back through my house and everything is like I'm connected at home, so I have full access to my NAS, server VM's etc. as if I were local, and no ads wherever I go, as even my cellphone routes back through my house wherever I am.\n\nsimple to set up and maintain, Worth every penny. the internal VPN might be a little difficult to set up for some, but PiHole is pretty simple, and PFsense is drop dead easy to set up.", "963" ], [ "Wasn't sure what it was in Richmond, I know in Nanaimo back in the time tunnel ~10yrs ago when we had to call one it was $160 but I think there was a factor of distance involved. \n\nI just ballparked $200 because I figured the ambulance would be less, plus maybe a few extra costs here and there as not *everything* is free when you go to a hospital. Some things will still have small non-covered charges.\n\nI figured, carted in, to walking out, 3 days, $200 was probably a decent dart to throw.", "610" ], [ "so, I just came here from /r/all, I have no idea whats going on, but I've seen the funhaus sub show up on the front page a bunch of times over the past 6ish months.\n\nIf I have no idea what funhaus is, or whats going on, but I'm just interested in the gossip and wondering whats going on, could someone give me the cliff notes so I can share in whatever is going on?\n\nedit: apparently no, asking whats going on isn't ok. I guess you all aren't fans of new comers.", "434" ], [ "I live in Canada, and grew up as our green party has been gaining momentum in a few places. This is almost exactly what happened here, and from reading the comments here, you're exactly where we were 5ish years ago.\n\ngreen party was made fun of, and the general consensus was that they were a bunch of delusional tree huggers that would piss away all their money and get nothing done (to be fair, if you go back 10yrs, they kind of were, they didn't start with a well thought out plan of action, more just some wishy-washy ideals without a way to get it done properly), but over time they gained legitimacy, they started to put forth better thought out plans. In 2011 they finally gained a seat, they held it in 2015, and have done a decent job. This year their message was even better thought out, their candidates are level headed and smart, and now that they've gained some legitimacy they're now up to 3 seats and have been doing a good job so far.\n\nkeep pushing, it takes awhile for a new party to gain momentum against the old ideas, but some new blood can do great things.", "578" ], [ "a hermaphroditic species contains the organs for both sexes. So they contain both a sperm and an egg. In some species that will mean when they do the deed, both are impregnated by each other (both have young), in some one will fertilize the other (one will have young, which one depends on species and situation)\n\nsome worms are actually even A-sexual, in which case there is no sex, in the most basic of terms, one day it will start to consume more material, and its cells will start reproducing more and more, until it grows another of itself like a tumor. one day it'll will simply split apart and now you have two separate organisms.", "262" ], [ "I'm not a pilot, but a diver. Your ears get used to it the more you do it. If I haven't gone diving in over a year they might give me a bit of issue. but in general like any muscle the more it gets stretched/used, the more flexible it becomes. I (and many divers) can actually equalize my ears without having to even plug my nose now. it took a bit of trying and coaching when I was learning to use a full face mask where you can't plug your nose.", "658" ], [ "as much as I love my tort I would advise against getting one until your mid twenties. \n\nTorts require lots of space and when you're looking for a cheap first apartment, you'll be signing up for paying for a 2 bedroom as the tort will take up basically a room unto itself. That's too expensive for most people until they have a career position somewhere.\n\nWant to go for a weekend trip with your friends? Too bad, tort requires daily care, so unless you've got a roommate that isn't coming, you'll have to find someone willing to come by your house to change water, feed, bath etc. Every day.\n\nThe money for food, lighting etc. Is no problem now, what about in 4yrs when you are moved out and paying for your own bills?\n\nWant to go to college and stay in a dorm? Too bad, no pets, and not enough space.\n\nI could go on, but you get the gist, you're good on a tort now, but you'll be basically signing your parents up to keep and take care of it starting in 3-4yrs and for probably 6ish years after that.\n\nTorts also aren't pets to handle, they don't like being picked up and theyike to be left to their own devices. Mine likes a little petting on the head and neck, but \"likes to be handled\" would be a far stretch. They're more \"observe\" pets, than \"play with\" pets.", "173" ], [ "its all cosmetic, but you would be surprised how big the bill can be after a crash like this. Even when they have one of the big HERD/protection bumpers on them. the entire hood, fenders, fairings, etc. is all fiberglass. so even small impacts can cause it to shatter to pieces. \n\nThe hood *alone* (no brackets, hood pivots, lights, springs, hood struts, latches etc.) is ~$10k add in all the extras required that can't be transferred and you're looking at ~$14k . Thats just in parts before you pay the $170/hr labor rate to have someone install it.\n\na crash like this isn't going to twist the frame or anything, but no bill when it comes to semi trucks is a small bill. When your someone says \"any bill less than $1k for your car is a good one\" semi truck drivers think any bill less than $10k is a good one.\n\n(I work at a semi truck bodyshop)", "352" ], [ "too many people act like the only speed they have to pay attention to is the speed limit. My gf was like this when I met her \"as long as I'm not going over the speed limit I can drive whatever speed I want\" but shes also one of those people that when the light turns green it can take her a couple seconds to realize and start going. She never uses her phone in the car, even at red lights, she just isn't paying attention to the light until the car next to her starts moving.\n\nneedless to say I drive everywhere in our relationship, she doesn't get behind a wheel unless she has a gun to head.", "523" ], [ "I definitely didn't know, there were no roundabouts in my city, and they weren't a part of my testing/training back when I got my license.\n\nthat said its pretty easy to figure out, if you're exiting immediately, be in the right lane. This is like when you're in a double left hand turn lane, and the guy in the left most lane cuts you off because he needs to go into the parking lot on the right ***immediately*** after the turn. \"then why weren't you in the right hand turn lane motherfucker!?\".", "523" ], [ "I agree the slogan is dumb, but the movement to defund the police doesn't mean there would be no police. It means putting less money into police and equipment that escalates situations and splitting up responses into more facets that are targeted at the calls that police are having to deal with now that they have no training for, or just simply don't require a guy with a gun and police training to do it.\n\nthat way the cop with a gun that you need to deal with your home invasion isn't tied up dealing with a screaming homeless man on the corner by the 7/11. And the kid thats threatening to jump doesn't have armed gunmen showing up saying \"don't try and jump or we'll shoot you\" and instead has a negotiator trained in suicidal situations. \n\nand when that 7/11 worker hits the alarm because he's being robbed, the cops with guns can show up instead of sitting on their thumb for 45min while writing up a report about a neighbor that keeps throwing their dog shit over the fence.\n\nIt means you're ***more*** likely to get a response from emergency service that are tailored to your situation.", "582" ], [ "we do charge about $10 more per hour than most other shops in town. But thats because we're the only shop in town with full size paint/drying booths. We have 3 booths each can fit 2 hoods apiece. As well as 2 full size paint/dry booths that you can paint a tri-drive truck in (you could fit 2 tandems in each, but we would never put 2 trucks in at the same time). As well as 2 small item drying booths (same size as our hood booths, but only used for drying things like fenders and small items) and a large paint room for the small items. We also have a 12 bay assembly shop on the bodyshop side, and a 15 bay PDI shop to assemble our new trucks, and thats not counting the 6 LPG bays (although rarely used for LPG these days, its now the overflow from our main service shop down the road, its a 30 bay service center, and 8 bay engine overhaul shop). We're also the only shop in town that does LPG, and we're the only place in town with a tri-drive dyno.\n\nSo we get away with charging a little extra because we offer so many extra services.", "610" ], [ "a lot of people not used to trucks downvoting this.\n\ntheres a reason so many truck drivers have labels that say things like \"no pussy foot'n\" or \"no step\" on their fender, and this is ***exactly*** why. Because someone comes along thinking \"how do I reach the windshield\" and climbs onto the ***fiberglass*** fender and cracks it. Truck fenders are not load bearing parts, theres no metal framing inside there, its just fiberglass. If you're lucky theres a hard plastic rock guard inside. Hes even using the mirror mount as a hand hold, those are held in with 5/16 stainless bolts, threaded into shitty rivnuts in the aluminum cab corner, they'll rip right through that sheet metal.\n\nOpen the hood, stand on the tire, climb on the steering box, use the hood guide, hell stand on the engine if you want the valve cover will take it. just not the fender, it'll crack, or just even look at the slope of it, you'll slip and fall off and your claims adjuster will laugh at you when you try and get paid leave for it.", "803" ], [ "I didn't even realize it was a kid, I was already wondering what the fuck is wrong with this guy. First hit, ok I can write that off, accidents happen when somebody does something stupid, but this guy was an asshole. He obviously wanted to go flying down the hill as fast as he could, I can understand the frustration, its like getting stuck behind someone on a highway going 20 under the limit, but this was so excessive and deliberate, guy should be ashamed not grinning like a fucking lunatic.", "449" ], [ "we sell these at my truck shop and I hate them. They wont do any damage as they're just pop on plastic. (I recognize the brand, those are the TRUX kits #TNUT-C4). But even if they aren't dangerous I personally think they look trashy. They're just so, try hard/\"I'm a bad ass\". Especially on an aero truck like this. At least on a murdered out 367/T800 They'll match the vehicle style. \n\nbut at the end of the day, whatever makes the owner happy, I don't get to be the judge of his taste. Everyone gets their own.", "493" ], [ "Yes sir, pretty generous access to OT if you want it too, and if you take the night shift (4pm-12:30am) you get an extra $5/hr. I'm actually a journeyman partsman not a mechanic (hence why I know the price for the parts better than the labour hours for install). but even at the counter I make $47/hr. Last year my take home (after taxes, but with OT hours and bonuses/boot and tool etc.) was $98k. Not bad for only 2 months in college (course is 6 months, but I challenged my first and third year tests). You start at $27/hr, but every time you pass your 1st/2nd/3rd year tests you get a raise.\n\nmechanics have to work a lot harder for their dollar, and they have less access to OT, the job is harder on their body, and they have a 4yr course instead of a 3yr, but their job opportunities are more plentiful, they make an extra $3/hr, and their wage is protected by law (they're ***required*** to be paid at or above $39/hr, partsman wage is whatever the place decides the pay rate to be, as long as all the partsmen are paid the same its legal) As well they don't have to deal with customers generally.", "392" ], [ "that wasn't list price, thats just cash sale customer cost. List price is always something completely out to lunch. for example list price on that hood I was talking about is $14k list instead of $10k, but theres no way for me to even charge the customer that if I wanted to. My system wouldn't even let me unless I manually entered the price.\n\nour warranty certainly pays us out for our full customer sale price though. The only one that doesn't is Cummins, who only gives us 15% mark-up on parts.\n\nLabour is where we get fucked most of the time, companies often only give us like 30min to do a 1.5hr job. But it varies, bendix is usually alright, but scotseal never gives us anywhere near enough, cummins usually gives us more than we need, horton varies, fifth wheels they usually give us more, but fan clutches they never give enough. Its a bit of a crap shoot, but it can be seriously hard to make time on most warranty jobs.", "565" ], [ "I mean, I will say, small/local business owners are some of the worst to work for in a general sense, they micromanage when they shouldn't, they're penny pinchers especially when it comes to labour costs, and they're the most likely to break labour laws and try and force/talk employees into situations that they shouldn't be in.\n\nwith that said I understand why, when you're local you're running a business on razor thin margins, labour costs are some of the highest costs and a lot of people don't think about the fact that a $1/hr raise is costing their owner a few grande a year, that business is your baby and you *know* that 17yr old doesn't give a *shit* so of course you watch him like a hawk, you don't have the capital to absorb the costs that might be associated with a slow year or an accident of any kind really (a single workplace accident can *easily* sink a business), and plus larger corporations and franchises don't have to worry about things like advertising costs to bring in business.\n\nplus what pretty much ***everyone*** seems to forget about the ***RISK*** everyone likes to think about all the profits that an owner rakes in once the business is up and running, but if it was so easy everyone would do it. Nobody likes to talk about the fact that at *some* point this local business owner ponied up 10's of thousands of dollars worth of their own money/borrowed money that they'll owe the bank and gambled it all to try and *make* these profits. I have no love for corporations, but a local business is something that can easily fail and leave the prospective owner broke, bankrupt, and in the shit for the rest of their lives. So yeah, (s)he makes more money than their average employee, but complain when you've got $500k and you're willing to gamble it all on starting up a brick and mortar shop.", "231" ], [ "well then I would say this is a problem for your gf who needs to stand up and either stop telling her roommate that shes leaving at all, just leave. Or she needs to step up and say \"sorry we're looking for it to be just us\". Its your gf's roommate, its your gf letting her come along, its your gf's problem to sort out. Theres unfortunately not much ***you*** can do.", "698" ], [ "I'll say the same thing I always say when this comes up. Breaks don't work, a break is just a break up with a space in between.\n\nshe wants to get with another guy, its the only reason to ***ever*** suggest a break. If she just wanted time and space, you can do that without being on a break. Adults can just spend some time apart, the only reason to have a break is for the moral absolvement that comes with it when you sleep with someone else.\n\nthink about it logically, to suggest a break it means acknowledging that your SO might sleep with someone else. The only time you would be cool with that is if either you think so lowly of your SO that they either can't or wont sleep with anyone else themselves, or you want to sleep with someone so badly that you've got blinders on and don't *care* if your SO sleeps with someone else.\n\nshes not even wanting to give you the option to sleep with someone else, but she wants to have that option? why? I'm hoping this is just a troll post because the alternative is just sad.", "657" ], [ "well then I stand by what I said, you sound unhealthily infatuated with this girl and shes using it to walk all over you. a \"break\" thats just for her, is just an excuse for her to take a run at another guy while you wait in the wings.\n\nI suggest just broaching the subject of \"how about we just spend a week or two (or however long shes said she requires) of no contact for you to sort your stuff out, but without calling it a \"break\" or breaking up, we stay faithful to each other but just spend a little time apart\"\n\nshe'll either agree to it and you'll *forever* wonder if she slept with someone else anyways, or she'll dig her heels in about being able to \"act single\" and you'll know her true motivation ***is*** in fact to sleep with someone else.\n\nedit: but for the record my advice is to just break up with her, she's obviously infatuated with someone else, and by the time it gets to the point that shes asking for a break its already too late.", "657" ], [ "> Dude, don't make his medical condition about you:\n\nThat was my first thought too. As far as I know Viagra doesn't alter your mental state, it just physically gives you an erection. That means he's probably been having some problems down there so his ego is already bruised. Nothing is worse than having a problem that you've been internalizing for a long period of time, having it be involuntarily revealed, and then having the person you want to find out the least freak out and make it all about them so when you're having one of the worst times of your life, instead of *getting* support you're forced to *give* support to keep them happy.", "524" ], [ "well as far as I know, at east here in Canada, its actually *illegal* for him to work like this without a contract. It would be equivalent to working \"under the table\". with no contract hes not technically employed there, so entering a job site like that voids their insurance, means he can't pay taxes on the money hes earned, and leaves him at risk of not getting paid.", "679" ], [ "thats a dangerous way of thinking though, don't assume that just because the damage has disappeared from one place that it can't be present in other ways or be doing damage in ways that you can't easily see on the surface. A release of free radicals in your lungs won't necessarily show in the lungs directly, your circulatory system can bring those types of things all over the place.\n\nI'm not saying that vaping is necessarily bad, but I agree that long term studies are required to truly find out. Vaping has only really taken hold in the past 5+ish years. The entire debate of whether vaping is bad for your health is all conjecture at this point and is going to take 20yr long studies to really know.\n\nOn the surface I entirely agree that its healthier than cigarettes, I think thats relatively obvious though.", "568" ], [ "its the reason I was a little annoyed that they continued the \"fat thor\" thing through the whole movie. I was hoping we'd have a moment where all the sudden lighting would strike and he'd magically go back to normal.\n\nI felt the whole fat thor bit undercut the badassery of <PERSON> for the whole movie, even such a pivotal moment for the three of them going into whats supposed to be the biggest fight of their lives so far and theres <PERSON> looking like a fat chode in a moment where they're supposed to be menacing and looking like the gods that they are.", "43" ], [ "when I was younger, my dad moved to a different city for work, and my mom worked full time so we got a cleaner that would show up once a week on mondays.\n\nI was always so excited on pro-d days (days off for teachers to get things organized in school) to have the day off....until I got home and realized the cleaner was there, who didn't understand english but always wanted to talk to me and as often as not brought her 6yr old son over to watch tv while she worked. So I would get home, I couldn't watch tv because of the son, I couldn't play games because of the vacuum and I couldn't just sit around and read or anything because she was always trying to talk to me in her broken english and even if I tried to talk with her she never understood a word that I was saying so it was just frustrating.", "713" ], [ "sorry but YTB\n\nif its in the rules that you aren't allowed to sleep in the same dorm, you can't very well then be surprised when you miss out on promotional opportunities and your superiors now think less of you because of it.\n\nat a job, ***any*** job, if you start fraternizing while at work, even at places where its ***not*** against the rules (and here it was) the people above you will not take kindly to it because its unprofessional to mix business and personal.\n\nhere, yes the director didn't say anything, but you can't confuse turning a blind eye with acceptance/approval. Just because they're tolerating it, doesn't mean they're happy about it. It was apparently a situation of \"as long as nobody says anything I guess we'll let it slide\" but someone *did* say something, and you got bit by it. You *tolerate* a screaming baby on a plane because you understand they're human, but that doesn't mean you're happy about it.", "402" ], [ "I'm going to go with <PERSON>\n\nyou: because of your reasons, they may sound morally high, but as for A) whether shes a rebound or serious isn't for you to decide, as for B) you're not her protector, nor should you be judging your friend before hes actually done anything assholish. If you want her for yourself, be open about that fact. go to your friend and tell him you're still into her and its going to hurt you if he continues to pursue her.\n\nher: because if shes even considering dating your friend without either talking to you herself to clear it (if you two are still on good terms) or making sure your friend talked to you first to not split up/fuck up a friendship\n\nyour friend: because who TF thinks its a good idea to madly pursue their friends ex gf without speaking to them first.\n\nthe problems I see here is A) neither of you seem to be putting a whole lot of stock in what *she* may want, and if she even wants to date either you or your friend. B) even though \"dibs\" isn't a thing, pursuing a partner that you *know* a friend is interested in is shitty and C) pursuing the friend of an ex without telling one of them that its never going to happen or getting one of them to say they're ok with it is shitty behavior.\n\nits your friends decision if he want to ruin your friendship by pursuing this girl, its this girls choice who she wants to date not either of yours. and its your choice if you want to continue to pursue a relationship that failed once already to the possible detriment of a friendship.", "657" ], [ "seconded, I subbed to her snap a couple days ago...cuz y'know I'm a filthy animal, in the past 48hrs I've seen 6 guys rail her, all of them raw dog, and every one of them blew in her at least once (3-4 of them even went down on her....not sure if they knew they were licking some rando's spunk since she definitely didn't shower/bath in between)\n\nat first I thought she was just an escort using reddit to advertise, then I realized these guys aren't paying her unless you count her begging for uber eats to be ordered for her. pretty sure one guy just bought her mcdonalds.\n\ndon't get me wrong, I'm pretty sex positive, and obviously I find it hot (I'm still subbed to her snap) but this definitely surpasses regular sex stuff and noticeably has turned the corner into kinda dangerous. Shes obviously got a proper mental problem like nymphomania or shes a \"bug chaser\" or something. Honestly I'm pretty surprised, I don't get how you could watch her snap for more than a day or two and not bag it.", "1017" ], [ "Ummm am I the only one here that realizes this is clearly outside and not in the bay? This clearly out front/under the front overhang/\"carport\" area that's covered for dropping off and picking up cars.\n\nYou can see the glass to the right of the \"storefront\" of the dealership, theres no bay door, no lifts, no shop carts or tool boxes, oil stains etc. This is definitely outside.", "449" ], [ "Its obviously a case by case basis, but I totally agree with you, myself and most guys that I've talked to don't really care too much. It looks great in pictures, but in practice it just makes me worried I'm going to rip her expensive underwear. Plus they're usually harder to remove, and all the lace and fancy sewing makes it uncomfortable under the hand. I'll take a set of unmatching cotton any day of the week.\n\nnow if she wants to wear it because it makes ***her*** feel sexy, and therefore more confident, and usually therefore more sexually aggressive, I'm all for that. a comfortable girl is a confident girl, a confident girl is a happy girl, and a happy+confident girl is almost always better in bed", "506" ], [ "I mean, is he being a little difficult about the whole thing, yeah, definitely.\n\nat the same time, I don't think theres anything wrong with expecting you to pay your own way at restaurants and the like. Expecting your SO to pay for their own stuff isn't selfish like some people here are stating, theres nothing wrong with wanting a SO thats self sufficient and not a dependent, thats just equality. \n\nThrowing a tantrum over a smoothie doesn't bode well though, but I would say its on par with having a SO that thinks so low of me that she says where I work is just \"easy money\", Someone that thinks my families money is my money, and a SO that watches how and where I spend ***my*** money as closely as you seem to.\n\nI would say you ***both*** need to stop worrying about money as much as you are, he definitely needs to lighten up a bit about the small stuff, and you could stop expecting him to pay for dates because if you think he should pay for you, then you need to be ready to pay for him in equal measure.", "312" ], [ "yeah wow, ITT: Equality! (oh, except for if she thinks his family is rich, then he should be buying you more shit!)\n\nlike, seriously, his family money, isn't *his* money, no matter what kind of money they have and even if it ***was*** his money, that doesn't make him obligated to spend any more of it on her than any other SO would. I would also think it strange if my SO started asking me to buy her things in such a way, I wouldn't throw a tantrum about it, but if I knew they could pay their own way with it was just choosing not to and instead ask me to buy it for them that would be a red flag for me.\n\nand anyways, with the amount that shes analyzing how much he spends on himself in such detail, and how much he might have available to him, and the fact that she thinks that either of those factors mean anything when it comes to how much he should be spending on her, I have a feeling that theres a lot more to this than what <PERSON> has written. I get the feeling it was less of a \"fit\" and more of a couple questions as to why he should pay for it just because she doesn't want to use her CC on small purchases fo some reason. This reads like a guy that either has had gold digging GF's in the past, or is getting the feeling that <PERSON> is a digger and is trying to protect himself against it.", "312" ], [ "sounds like <PERSON> is trying to bang her and shes not into it, but also sounds like shes too naive about it, and she thinks she can turn this into a friendship type relationship when really if hes trying to get her into bed, telling her about his boners, getting her to sit on his lap etc. it is *not* going to turn into a friendship. This guy is never going to stop trying to get in her pants.\n\nhes not *too shy* thats just a BS excuse to separate you and the gf, and not even a **good** excuse\n\nSounds like your gf is faithful, but I wouldn't be comfortable with it either.", "657" ], [ "I'm not sure what that has to do with anything that I said. Sure it *could* be a possibility, but if we're going with unfounded assumptions, he *could* also have prostate cancer, he *could* be gay, he *could* just have a lower libido.\n\nits ***much*** safer to assume that he was just home from work, tired, stressed, unshowered and just plain feeling unsexy and therefore not really into the idea of having sex at the time based off of what information OP has provided.", "524" ], [ "> the 30k car I bought for myself but that she drives. She made me take the bus for 5 months until I was gifted a car that I fixed up to get running on the road\n\nwhy? why would you let that happen, and I mean it when I say \"let it\" you allowed this, its your car, in your name, you had the keys. Why did you give them to her, and why did you let her keep them?\n\nYes it does sound like shes a gold digger, but it also sounds like she found a pretty decent mark since you don't have a backbone and won't stand up for yourself.", "257" ], [ "It Is your body and your choice. You can wear whatever you want. He hasn't *demanded* that you not wear these things, he hasn't *forbidden* you, he's let you know what his preferences are and what is going to make him uncomfortable.\n\nYou can wear something that makes him uncomfortable if you want, just know that it *will* make him uncomfortable. This isn't a question with a cut and dry answer. if there had been demands then it would be more clear cut, but if all he's doing is letting you know where his boundary is, and whats going to make him uncomfortable then thats all he can do.\n\nthis is one of those \"free speech\" types of things. \"free speech\" allows you to say whatever you want, nobody is going to censor you. but it doesn't negate the *consequences* of those actions. You can still be tried for hate speech and slander despite \"free speech\".\n\nthis is the same thing, you have \"free speech\" over what you wear, but now you know where his boundary is and if you cross it you may find yourself without a boyfriend because of it. and him leaving you for crossing that boundary is just as ok as you wearing whatever you want.", "442" ], [ "Last I heard average stars, Males avg$200-$500 per shoot, females about $2000-$3000, the big stars/household name level fandom, M avg $1000-$2000 I've heard of few niche guys like <PERSON> making $3k per if theyre known reliable actors with fetish draws like BBC and such, F avg $5000-$8000 per shoot\n\nThat's not counting any back end deals, promotional contracts, conventions, merch (like pocket pussies or dildos molded etc)\n\nThat info is a couple years old though, pre cam craze which from what I've heard has lowered wages and upped competition in the industry", "610" ], [ "I do not think you're wrong at all, I would be expecting an apology after the way he acted. Don't fuck with my stuff if you're not going to be careful with it, especially my *really expensive* stuff. Don't goad me into being angry, then get surprised when I do in fact get angry afterwards. Don't make a scene in front of friends and then act surprised when I hold you accountable after you sober up.\n\nbeing drunk and \"having fun\" isn't a get out of jail free card for your actions when they affect those around you.", "145" ], [ "Theres a lot of hangout situations that get posted on this sub where I think guys are being over protective or overreacting and shooting themselves in the foot by freaking out over it.\n\nthis isn't one of those situations, hanging out with an ex, in a bathing suit, secluded on a boat, drinking, right after he wants to tout about him getting his life together and such, completely alone, after he noticeably and pointedly didn't invite me.\n\nthis would be a deal breaking hangout for me, I would never tell my gf what she can and can't do, but this would make me so uncomfortable theres no way I would tell her I'm ok with it. This would be a hard \"go if you want, but I wont be waiting for you when you get back\"\n\nat best I would basically say, \"tell him I'm coming along\" theres really no reason why you *shouldn't* be allowed to come on such an obviously uncomfortable circumstance. At least then you're there yourself to judge whether he respects your relationship or not.\n\nI also can't imagine your girlfriend ***not*** understanding how this makes you uncomfortable, and pressing for a \"but we're old friends and I want to catch up alone\" if shes so naive or so disrespectful of your feelings to tell you, you can't come. Then I can only think of one reason why she would gamble and disrespect your feelings in such an obviously leading circumstance.", "591" ], [ "I posted this in the last thread of this video and got downvoted with nobody saying anything, but I'm saying it again.\n\nIn event security you're told to pull the barrier if an overwhelming push is coming that you know it and you won't stand for. \n\nIn a multi-thousand person push/march, leaving the barrier is how people die at events. A standing one people can get crushed against, and a fallen one becomes a tripping hazard, and tripping leads to getting trampled by the crowd.\n\nI'm not saying it absolves everything, theres still some questions that need to be answered, I'm just saying the quick removal of the barrier isn't one of the questions that needs answering.", "955" ], [ "My basement home theater room gets so little light that the buttons on my remote don't even glow. I have a hard time believing my remote will be getting enough light to function properly.\n\nbut I guess if all I have to do is bring my remote upstairs for an hour once a week or something means no more batteries I'll live with the inconvenience. but in my eyes its hardly where resources should be spent considering I don't think I've had to change a remotes batteries since 2001. They're pretty energy efficient these days and don't exactly go through batteries every 6months like when I was a kid.", "333" ], [ "If a woman isnt willing to be the big spoon every once in awhile, then me and her aren't going to work out.\n\nits ok to be a man and want affection. It took me until probably 18-20 to realize it, but just because you're a man, doesn't mean you don't want to be oogled, cuddled, snuggled, and sometimes even taken care of or pitied.\n\nthese are normal feelings for people, just because you're a guy and its not the most societally accepted role for you, doesn't mean you don't have them.\n\nif you're like me, and you happen to usually be ok with the typical roles *most* of the time, but you just have your moments when you need a little affection in a reversed role, you just need to be willing to ask for it. Or spend enough time in a relationship with someone that they can tell when you need it (and they way they learn that, is by you asking).\n\njust don't be afraid to come home, sit next to your gf/SO and lay down and plop your head in her lap and say \"I had a shit day\". You'd be surprised how many women are entirely cool with that.\n\nMost ***real*** women, don't expect you to be the big, strong, stoic, man all the time. And in that position they'll treat you the way they like to be treated too. Because, again, all people feel this way sometimes.", "971" ], [ "agreed, I hate having majority of the links that seem to make top page on reddit are nothingburgers that nobody should care about.\n\nI'm not saying the democratic reps, shouldn't be calling for the resignation, they absolutely should be. I'm just saying, nobody needs to be reading a reddit post about it, a news story doesn't need to be written about it.\n\nNothing will come of this because \"calling for\" this, that, or the other thing means zero to the other side. So why do I care to hear about it?\n\nits like saying \"Democratic reps showed up for work today\"", "945" ], [ "I bought mine for $5k 4yrs ago '00 limited. Polished it, little bit of plastic restoration and kept the interior clean.\n\nEven with a couple of repaired rust spots and the usual wear and tear things like a torn driver's seat, flaked hood paint etc. I still had a guy offer me $10k for it a couple weeks ago.", "352" ], [ "My old manager when we had complaints would say:\n\n\"ok, so cry me a river, build me a bridge, and jump the fuck off of it, what do you want me to do about it?\"\n\nI fucking hated that guy. and <PERSON> if you're reading this, now you're a bartender that just lost his job because of being lazy, and now I'm the parts manager of the third largest dealership on the continent. Maybe if you took some fucking responsibility you wouldn't have gotten fired from your fucking father in laws fucking store! Fuck you <PERSON>!", "428" ], [ "This is what I'm expecting.\n\nI think they planned on putting out a few DLC's of new gear, maybe a new multi-part side mission. maybe a couple new iconics for the guns that didn't get them.\n\nbut because of that bad release, its not like their budget got *bigger* to account for it. That money is just going to be re-allocated from DLC extras, to finishing the game and fixing the problems.\n\nso now we'll still probably get some extra free DLC content, but it will probably be 1/10th what it would have been. but all that money that was going to go to making cool free stuff, is going to go to fixing things.\n\nthen in a year or two, we'll probably get a proper expansion that we'll have to pay for just like <PERSON> did.", "838" ], [ "ABSOLUTELY!\n\nas an alberta resident, this is exactly what blows me away. I have multiple <PERSON>/MAGA co-workers. I don't understand it, why are you so stoked about a leader whos entire platform is \"fuck everybody else, I'm out for myself\".\n\nits a pretty far cry from the \"Canada is proud of our multiculturalism, and traditions of being friendly and working with other countries\" that I remember from when I was a kid. \n\nI don't understand how so many people can have this aggressive mindset against every other country or why they feel so threatened. Working together isn't just some lovey-dovey bullshit, its economically proven to advance your country to work and form trade deals with other countries.\n\nthe \"rugged individualism\" might sound all tough, but working together is how you succeed. \"rugged individualism\" is how you end up cold and alone, cloistered in your country swaddled in xenophobia. Go ask north korea how well its worked out for them to turn their back on the world and try and go it alone.", "760" ], [ "When I was 16-17, me (dumbass) and my dumbass friends, used to take furniture that people left out as \"free\" on the side of the road, to the blacktop of an old school in my area, douse it in gasoline and light it on fire. We would then sit and smoke weed as it burned until the cops or fire department showed up (if they did at all).\n\nwe were 16-17yr old stoners and, while stoned mind you, we even had the braincells to know, to make a line of gas away from where your fire was going to be, and light it from far, far away.\n\nits astonishing that these guys had the braincells to even get this far out in the woods. They share the same IQ as the wood they're ~~burning~~ blowing up.", "630" ], [ "I think the variance in gasoline engines for energy conservation maxes out at something super small like 2-3% these days (of the engine mind you, not the car as a whole as aerodynamics are going to play a huge part in your cars advertised fuel efficiency).\n\nIIRC out of the entirety of mankind knowing about the internal combustion engine, we've increased the efficiency by something silly small like 20%. but its been a long time since college, and I've smoke a lot of weed between then and now.", "726" ], [ "I gotta say, I've never been a fan of <PERSON>'s comedy. I completely wrote him off as a \"low hanging fruit\" comedian using racial stereotypes and his \"haha hairy guy in a mankini\" type to get a laugh. Because of that, I never really looked into how many or what kind of characters he was playing past Borat.\n\nThat man just floored me. That speech was well articulated and powerful. He is a much deeper thinker than I gave him credit for. I may still not enjoy his comedy personally, like most personal tastes its not going to change where my funny bone is, but I sure have an entirely new respect for the man. I don't even really care if he started out his comedy with this mindset in mind. The man obviously has his heart and mind in the right place. I never thought I would say this, but I kind of wish more people out there were like borat....", "323" ], [ "They have spent ***a lot*** of money in both straight up just buying and as well R & D of military equipment in the past 20ish years. Their army isn't really the \"low cost, cheap equipment, throw more soldiers at them to compensate\" of old.\n\nThey have a lot of new toys that they've never really played with and like a drunk 20yr old thats been taking MMA lessons for the past 12yrs they're itching for a fight to show how tough they think they are.\n\nand I think you're right, just like how WW1 was preceded by a lot of romanticizing the great wars of old and wanting to try out the new toys their militaries were playing with. People over the generations forget how awful war is, and they get back into the \"I want to get into a fight\" mindset of romanticizing war. \n\nI'm split on whether China is starting to fall into the romanticizing war and itching to fight category, or whether they're just playing this game of antagonization because they don't believe any nation's that matter militarily to them will ever actually get into a full out war with them so they know they can get away with it.", "753" ], [ "This is exactly the same as the phone manufacturers getting rid of the headphone jack.\n\n***nobody*** wants a touch screen instead of tactile buttons/switches. Hard to change the volume on your stereo or adjust the heat while maintaining eyes on the road when its a touch screen. Just like nobody really wanted to give up the headphone jack.\n\nbut in the exact same thing as with phones, the manufacturers don't give a shit what you want, because touch screens look sleeker/more refined to execs and focus groups and in pictures, which to them = selling more cars. but unlike phone manufacturers, where there were some consumer benefits to the loss like waterproofing, and added space for newer larger radios, theres basically no benefit to consumers for the loss of buttons/switches in cars.\n\nabove all though, a single touch screen is ***way*** cheaper, and easier to replace than to produce a whole slew of custom switches, knobs, and buttons. Plus the blue collar car companies have been swallowing up the high end companies for the past while, they put their standard switches/controls in their high end brands to cut costs/make more money. this is why you have things like the shitty switches from a chrysler in your maserati. and they've been getting noticeable flak for it. So their solution is to just get rid of all switches wherever they can and add them into the \"infotainment system\".", "393" ], [ "although I've started to hear rumblings of complaints from people recently. I think Tesla is spared the flak because \n\nA) they have a well designed UI \n\nB) there aren't many of them on the road and they're a niche market where people know what they're getting and there aren't many people out there in general to complain about them.\n\nC) they provide a large enough screen, with enough real estate to put majority of daily use selections on the main screen instead of hiding it in some menu 6 options deep. \n\ndo you remember like 10-15yrs ago, when manufacturers first started putting screens in cars just for GPS? The screens were like 4\" screens. My phone has a larger screen than the one in my dads mid 00's volvo for GPS. We sold Garmin GPS's that had auto update maps, with better graphics, that worked smoother, with bigger screens, for like $50.\n\nyeah, most car manufacturers still think thats an ok thing to do, but then they think they can throw it all on a touch screen at the same time. You can't go touchscreen only, and then cheap out and throw a barely responsive 5\" screen in your car with a terrible UI and still have it fly. That doesn't mean they aren't going to try though.", "49" ], [ "exactly, focus groups, execs, and cost cutting are the reasons cars have touch screens.\n\nits just like phones doing away with the headphone jack, they don't think it'll make a better experience for you the consumer. They don't give a fuck what the consumers *want* as long as it sells more than the other guys, costs less and looks good to the execs and focus groups while doing it.", "393" ], [ "Yeah, I'm surprised more people don't go ubiquiti. They've made their stuff pretty user friendly to even non-power users these days.\n\none of my co-workers, a mechanic that would still be using a flip phone if it didn't get weird looks (hates tech), was looking for some home security solutions, and as well was looking for some wifi solutions at the same time because he has an acreage. He asked me what I use in my house. I gave him some help picking out which products to buy because he didn't understand the specs of what he was looking at. but I offered to help him out if he ran into any problems since I was the one that suggested ubiquiti stuff to him.\n\nnope the tech illiterate bugger was able to set up about 4 cameras, a video doorbell, 2 WAP's, and even a point to point bridge out to his workshop. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure theres some refinement to be had in his network, but from what I can tell he's done a pretty decent job.\n\nI guess their stuff comes at a bit of a premium, but honestly if you get equipment with similar specs and ease of installation, you're probably not saving *that* much by going with another brand. and the ability to self host is pretty priceless IMO. Service fees *always* go up, companies always jerk around their most loyal customers, and the fear of having all my equipment bricked just because the company goes under is enough for me to happily pay the extra.", "465" ], [ "heh, I dunno how long its going to be like this, but I was just looking and out of the top 20 posts there, 17 of them are for \"flaired users only\". The same people that make fun of others for needing a \"safe space\" are the same people locking up their sub to deliberately make it an echo chamber, and posting on almost every political sub post whining about how \"reddit is liberal trash\" and whining about why everyone downvotes them and doesn't agree with their ideals...", "728" ], [ "> reddit is a perfect representation of what happens with ~~liberal~~ mob rule,\n\nFTFY, liberal has nothing to do with it. It's a social media platform, not a news distribution platform where they have to pretend that all stances are equal. It's mob rule corner to corner, not just politics. It's literally a site wide popularity contest, and republicans are the minority in their own country, let alone the world, ***of course*** you're going to be downvoted, the vast, vast majority of the world (the mob) don't agree with the republican ideology. \n\nNot really sure what you were expecting.", "126" ], [ "this is my favourite way to play it. I honestly don't really mind answering a few calls here and there to help out my work, I'm 31 with no kids, I'm not exactly too busy. but this isn't a friendship, this is a \"you pay me, and I do shit for you\" relationship. Its business, and I expect to be paid for my efforts. If I can get some OT out of it, then I'm game.\n\nbut if I'm not being paid to do it, I'm not lifting a finger. Its not like the owner is going to show up at my house to help me move. So why should I be doing free favours for him? but if you want to have me on hourly, then you pay me $57, and I do whatever you want for an hour, thats the deal. If you don't pay me, I don't work.", "1017" ], [ "If he cared he would just be jealous of the numbers <PERSON> is putting up.\n\nmore drone strikes in <PERSON> first 2yrs of office than obamas full 8yrs\n\nmore civilians killed by them in the first year of <PERSON> admin than in obamas 8yrs\n\npast the first 2yrs, <PERSON> overturned obamas executive order of drone strikes being public record so he could hide his numbers because he knew they made him look bad.\n\n<PERSON> wasn't a saint or anything, but drone strikes isn't really something <PERSON> or his supporters probably want to bring up. If you're going to make snarky comments like that, maybe try and keep informed/up to date.", "533" ], [ "I'm foreign, but that's what surprised me too. I knew <PERSON> was going to be a loud mouthed idiot. But I figured at some point he would do something so blatent that the guys like <PERSON> and <PERSON> that bad mouthed him before the 2016 election would go back to hating him and take their chance to throw w him under the bus.\n\nBut it never came, they just kept towing the party line no matter what. To the point that even many Republicans started to flip. I never thought they would push the R's far enough to vote D/not show up", "469" ], [ "as far as total cost, they would definitely be better off just adding them all at once.\n\nbut a condo isn't an apartment, and total cost doesn't matter because the costs need to be either individual or shared by everyone.. You'd have to convince the condo board that its in the best interests of the entire building for everyone to chip in to add them.\n\nand even then, you have to find out some way to tell which stall is tied to which condo, to which charger. because the whole building isn't going to want to all start chipping in to charge your car for you. They're going to want it tied to your meter. Hence the daughter panel that he's talking about, the power to that charging station is obviously tied to the meter and power panel of their individual condo so that the electricity is billed to their unit.\n\nand if theres only a couple chargers per parking area, who gets the chargers? what if there are more people with EV's than chargers? what if there are less? \n\netc. etc.\n\nits just a whole bag of worms that needs to be figured out and each building needs to figure it out independently since they're all owned by the individuals.\n\nall these problems (and more) are solvable, its not like these are questions without answers, but there are different ways to solve it, and some people are going to be ok with a way, and others wont be. So it all needs to be hashed out.", "202" ], [ "and if it was a single/select few communal spot(s) for charging all the EV's who pays for it? does the whole building now pay for the electricity to charge the cars of the few that purchase EV's? do they have to install a swipe card \"charge it to this unit\" system?\n\nare you now helping to pay to charge my EV every night?\n\nif its an apartment building, who pays to upgrade to having a charging station? the landlord? if it wasn't a part of the original lease then why would the government have the ability to force him to upgrade the place with EV charging? If the government doesn't get involved, its hard enough to get your landlord to fix a broken appliance that ***is*** contractually a part of the lease, how hard do you think its going to be to get them to voluntarily install a charging station that costs 10x what the dishwasher cost.\n\nits a good idea to start thinking about mandating EV charging being available in new construction in more places than it already is, but just don't expect some big EV wave to come along and start changing all the old buildings to being EV capable any time soon. Its just not feasible for too many places.", "202" ], [ "Well a lot of guys are still in the, good ol' boy / \"diesel or nothing\" category. But theres enough of them that have told me that they're on the wait list for an EV that its surprised me. \n\nI work in a semi truck dealership, there are more truckers and farm guys coming in telling me they're going to be buying an EV here in AB, than there were people telling me they were going to be buying an EV 2yrs ago when I lived in BC and worked at a canadian tire in the suburbs. \n\nmaybe its just that they're more likely to talk about it, but the general \"talk\" at the counter has been surprisingly positive.", "202" ], [ "Depends on if I bought the car like that.\n\nMy 4runner has a cracked exhaust manifold so it ticks constantly and drives my gf nuts, but I don't even hear it anymore.\n\nMy sunroof started rattling a little when it's closed with the shade open about a week ago, and I swear that shit is going to make me go postal if I don't find our where its coming from in the next week.", "400" ], [ "I was super pissed when I realized they were doing this. \n\nI was stuck in the wasteland because of some other glitchy fuckery. I couldn't spawn a vehicle, because it would show the marker of my vehicle approaching, but it would just never arrive.\n\nso I started just running towards town hoping to jack a vehicle. there were always headlights in the distance, but a car never spawned. I ended up having to run, basically from the main nomad camp all the way into town. I didn't exactly time it, but I'm pretty sure it was a full 10-15min of running down a dark lifeless/empty highway until I found a car I could finally steal to get my as to a quick travel point.\n\nit was so frustrating.", "8" ], [ "Yeah, generally with these types of things they're required to provide at least *some* information. but not so much as to give away too much.\n\nthey usually set some sort of a baseline in the court as to whats unacceptable information to give out, and you're required to give any information up to the point of the baseline.\n\nso for example in the medical industry, if a doctor is doing a study, and needs a bunch of information, the baseline is usually individual identification. So they can pull whatever info they want, as long as, together, you wouldn't be able to figure out who the people are with the information provided.\n\nfor example they might be able to ask \"how many people in Nevada, died of lung cancer\" because thats going to give a list of thousands, but if they ask \"how many males between the ages of 46-48 died in Nevada of lung cancer between March 25 and march 30 in 2018.\" that would be rejected, Because that might only be a list of a handful of people, and from that list you might be able to take that information and say \"that death there must have been <PERSON>\" \n\nso its probably something similar where they're going to set a baseline of where Valve is allowed to start fighting back about the release of information and anything up to that point is fair game.", "779" ], [ "I dunno about you, but I also don't usually get along with people that call themselves stoners in their bio.\n\nI mean, yeah, I probably smoke enough weed to be put in the \"stoner\" category, but people who self identify as a stoner in things like social media, are often the same kind of people that think the fact that they smoke weed is a personality trait.", "336" ], [ "meh I'm torn on it.\n\nin the early seasons shes super supportive and ready to sacrifice everything for the family, but she goes through a long time in the middle seasons where shes barely connected to the rest of the cast because they're growing up, and shes off doing her own thing.\n\nand I think a lot of people forget all the awful shit she does throughout the series that kind of goes completely against that character trait, and shows shes just as selfish and shitty as everyone else in the show.\n\nfor most of seasons 2-3-4 shes fucking up the kids and <PERSON> (and plenty of other peoples) lives up a lot more than shes helping them.", "513" ], [ "Oh definitely, it fits with the character and fits with the show. Completely understandable to spiral a bit with the pressure and shit she's dealing with. And it makes sense that after raising the kids her whole life she has no idea how to be a responsible adult herself. Everyone is terrible and pretty selfish in the show.\n\nShe's a great character for the show, but I wouldn't call her a good person any more than the other characters.", "522" ], [ "Arguing that pretty much any of the <PERSON> clan is a good person is kind of nuts to me.\n\nThey're all excellent ***characters*** but that doesn't make them a good *person*.\n\n<PERSON> cheated on pretty much every guy she's with in the series, she squandered the rent money on more than one occasion, left loam to get into her cocaine and wanted <PERSON> to drop out of college so that she didn't have to plead guilty. And that's all in the first 4-5 seasons.\n\nSure it's understandable, she was under insane amounts of pressure, never really learned how to be a responsible adult herself, never was able to really catch a break.\n\nIt all make sense and makes her a great character, but everyone in the show has their moments where they do awful, selfish things that fuck over the people they love. None of them are really good people. It's kind of the whole shtick of the show, these peoples selfish and shitty moments mixed with their moments of redemption.", "513" ], [ "I'm not gay myself, but I've spent a lot of time and have a lot of friends in the scene with various gender identities and sexualities.\n\nSomething thats constantly brought up, is how there are ***a lot*** of people that identify as gay, that believe exactly that, you're either gay or straight and bisexual doesn't exist.\n\nI lived in a pretty progressive part of canada most of my life, but for every random homophobe I've met, I've probably met 2 gay people with an opinion of \"bisexual doesn't exist, people who say they're bi are just closet about being gay\" or \"bisexual doesn't exist they're just straight and looking for attention\"\n\nfor the record, I don't agree with that point of view, I firmly believe its all a spectrum and you can fall anywhere on it, at any point in time, with any particular person. but there are a lot of prejudiced gay people out there.", "640" ], [ "how is this karma?\n\nfrom the original thread, apparently some chick was smashing a phone (maybe hers, maybe her boyfriends) she threw it on the ground and started stomping on it and kicked it into the street and left it there. <PERSON> was drunk, wandered out there saw it, saw that she left it, took a look, and whipped it. Alright not the best idea. Then proceeds to get his ass beat out of nowhere by the bf, and the gf, they're literally stomping on him, kicking him in the head, kicking him in the stomach while hes down, thats how you fucking kill people. \n\nat **best** this is a complete over-reaction, although if anything this is the reverse of karma. the asshole shit kicking a guy while hes down gets off completely scot-free.", "1012" ], [ "nah, other way around, that center lane is called a \"suicide lane\" (slang term) its used as a left turn waiting lane for both directions of traffic (yes this has the obvious design flaw of two cars going opposite directions pulling into it and causing a head on collision).\n\nsince this is a legal lane of use (although not legal to use for *travel*) and its an active lane as opposed to a static intersection where the blue car was) then the pt cruiser therefore had the right of way and the blue car is supposed to yield to the moving traffic. Compounded with the fact that if you can't see where you're going you're not supposed to go.\n\nso the blue car was technically in the wrong.\n\nthis is of course assuming the pt cruiser was preparing to turn left into the driveway(?) of the business on the left side of the road here", "523" ], [ "> It wasn't. Not at that speed.\n\nthey very well could have been going for the second left in the frame of the video, theres really no way for ***either of us*** to say definitively. Its very possible they were actively slowing down to make a turn at the speed they were going, its not like they were flying along at 80km/hr. \n\nso unless you're a mind reader, or you were the one driving the silver car, theres no real way for you to speak that definitively.\n\nall that we ***can*** know, is that the blue car, pulled from a static lane onto an active lane, without being able to see where they were going", "523" ], [ "> You are only supposed to enter this lane to make a left turn when there are no left turns for the opposite flow of traffic\n\nthese lanes are specifically for roads where there are multiple turn outs on both sides of the road that would required left turn lanes, but they don't have the distance between each turn out to give them their own turn lanes. So they're pretty much *only* used when *both* lanes have left turns to make.\n\nAs for speed, Its not like they were flying at 80-90km/hr, maybe a little too fast to turn right away, maybe not, neither of us have a radar gun or know the speed limit of this road. The road I take to work every day is a 75km/hr zone and has one of these lanes down the entire road. and if they were trying to make the left thats in the frame, then thats a pretty reasonable distance to drop speed for a left turn.\n\nbut no matter what, pretty much any discussion as to speed is irrelevant since neither of us know any specifics about it, all that you can say for absolute certain. Is the silver was in an active lane, and blue car was in a static lane, and silver could see where he was going, and blue obviously couldn't.", "523" ], [ "yeah, but on that same hand there are far too many people in this sub that think someone driving in your blindspot makes *them* responsible for the collision. Sure its dumb to sit there in a blind spot, and I find it infuriating when someone just matches my speed and camps out in my blindspot. but at no point would I think its their fault if I hit them while changing lanes because of it.\n\nIts never someone ***elses responsibility*** to avoid someones blindspot, it is ***your responsibility*** to check the blindspot before changing lanes.\n\nso yeah, cammer was *dumb* to drive in this trucks blindspot like that, however the truck was ***dumber*** for hitting them because they weren't paying attention to the fact that someone entered their blindspot and never left, and if they can't keep track of that, not adding a mirror in an appropriate place to be able to monitor that area and eliminate the blindspot.", "449" ], [ "plus people on this sub like to act as if the equipment on your vehicle is some unchangeable act of god. If you drive a truck *you can add mirrors to the truck*. if you have a large enough blindspot that a car can fit into it *its your responsibility to add a mirror in an appropriate place to eliminate that blindspot.* Blindspots aren't some unchangeable fact of your vehicle, if you have one large enough to be problematic, you can solve the issue. If you don't then you don't then get to blame the other guy for just driving in their lane and ending up in your blindspot. its one thing to have blindspot where if I stand or put something small in just the right space you can't see it, but if your blindspot is right next to your truck, and large enough that a car can fit into it, then its still your fault for not eliminating such an obvious problem with your vehicle.", "523" ], [ "Yeah, and for all you know he *was* turning left, the rear of his car isn't in frame long enough before the collision to say whether his signal was on or not, and even without a signal that doesn't put him legally at fault for the blue driver to turn for the same reason as if someone *does* have their turn signal on so you pull out and get hit because they drive straight.\n\nAnd no matter what silver car was doing, blue car is at fault because you're still required to yield for an active lane if you're in a static lane, and you're still required to see where you're going before starting a maneuver.", "523" ], [ "> No, the silver car is illegally traveling in a turn lane,\n\nprove it.\n\nif the crux of your argument is the silver car traveling illegally down the center lane, prove it. From this video neither of us can prove it in either direction. your entire argument is based off of that *assumption* and thats all it is, is an assumption. He could very easily be heading for one of the two turn offs in the frame. Especially since he *is* noticeably slowing down since if you go frame by frame you can see his brake lights are lit up when he enters the frame.\n\nthe reason hes not in frame for very long is because the crash happens ***2 car lengths*** in front of the cam car. Hes not driving noticeably faster in his direction than any of the oncoming traffic is traveling in their direction, and you don't know the speed limit.\n\nand you can only ***prove*** that silver was on an active road, blue was on a static intersection, <PERSON> could see where he was going, <PERSON> couldn't see where he was going (obviously)", "523" ], [ "Honestly I just wanted to make the joke that google image search is fucking awful these days because it always goes to Pintrest and Pintrest is a dumpster fire since it strips all context, backstory, etc. Off the image it's just random crap that goes nowhere that kills your ability to use Google image search effectively.\n\nReally I'm just trying to say fuck Pintrest.", "99" ], [ "Well if you're good for \"a few hundred feet\" then I'm seriously curious as to how long you think these cars are. A pt cruiser is ~10' long and the crash happens 2 car lengths in front of cammer, so even of you count the cam car that's about 30' of travel, even if you add distance between cars you're maxing out at ~50' and that's assuming a full car length of distance between each car which there most certainly is not.", "449" ], [ "exactly. offshore accounts and corporations aren't used to hoard money, the money flows *through* the account, and then funneled at an appropriate rate back into high earning countries at a rate that lowers how much they pay on taxes and after diversifying to yet *more* countries and other corporations back to where they need it.Its all a shell game to create convoluted paths to lower how much they pay in taxes and fees. It doesn't make any sense to invest and leave a bunch of money in a country with low economic growth, you move it back to countries like china, US, Canada Etc. where the growth rate is significantly higher and you can make more money re-investing it there.\n\nthat way if company you own A in Country X makes too much money this year and is going to get taxed too heavily, you incorporate in country Y under Company B with a low tax rate then Company B \"charges\" company A for whatever made up bullshit you can justify to the tax man. Then you move *just* enough money back into Company A to get it to a net Zero \"profit\" so that it pays no tax, whatever is left over you move to a different company, country or whatever.\n\nthe game is making up companies in whatever country has the tax breaks or loopholes required for whatever it is you need that money to do, then moving it back to where it gets its maximum return under a heading that doesn't constitute \"personal income\" and therefore paying the lowest tax and creating the largest gain. The huge corporations move money from company to company and country to country the same way we move money from our savings account to chequing account to credit card.", "786" ], [ "> For one it's an HHR. Both are almost fifteen feet long.\n\nok, so still ~50' since I gave a full 10' between cars, even if I give you the benefit of keeping 10' between cars, that makes it ~60' so silver still has ***over double*** the distance we've seen traveled already before he's done anything illegal if they get \"a couple hundred feet\"\n\n > and he certainly wasn't going for that\n\nand please, tell me how you know which left he was going for? \n\n > and that guy was hauling.\n\noh? how fast was he going? what's the speed limit on the road they're on?\n\n > It's very obvious the silver car was illegally using the lane.\n\nif its so obvious then why is everything you're saying completely based off of assumptions with zero proof of any kind involved? \n\n > I didn't read all this but it's pretty simple.\n\nif you're going to blatantly state that you're not willing to read whats already written, and you're just going to ask the same questions that I've already answered to other people, then I'm done answering because if you're not willing to do the bare minimum of having a conversation then I don't think you really deserve the respect of an answer.\n\nThe only ***facts*** that we have, is <PERSON> was in a static lane, and <PERSON> was in an active lane, and <PERSON> could see where he was going and <PERSON> obviously couldn't", "462" ], [ "its not a myth because we're talking about the same thing. Sure some money is definitely going to be in stable long term investments just like anybody else. \n\nbut when you say \"By investing it more actively than that you can make a lot more without ever doing anything shady.\" I'm not sure if you know what that means, because active investment is exactly what I'm talking about. Just scaled up from what you or I could ever do and with a couple extra steps that aren't shady at all, I'm not exactly talking about money laundering here. Its just using the tax breaks provided by different governments since different governments give higher tax breaks in different sectors that they're looking to grow and using already owned assets and investments to move money around using income and expenditure sheets to try and zero out income so as to lower taxes in the areas that you would pay high taxes by moving that income to companies and revenue sheets that are losing money through internal re-investment plans.\n\nit ***is*** active investment, its just scaled up to the point where you're able to take that investment money and buy and make and use entire companies which aren't necessarily in the same country to do it.", "786" ], [ "I actually work at a heavy duty(semi's) truck shop, our in house welder has offered to give me some pointers for the price of a coffee a day, and I'm allowed to use the scrap metal from our metal pile stock for practice material.\n\njust learning to weld and making my own is where I'm leaning right now, especially since I know I'll be wanting to weld other things in the future. They'll even let me use the shop welder to practice with, although they wont let me build the bumper here unless I cart it back and forth every day since they don't want a project like that just lying around taking up space, and they won't let an employee vehicle actually *inside* the shop so no test fitting or removal or installation allowed, but I can do that at my garage at home anyway.", "742" ], [ "Yeah its like nobody remembers the start of Blu-ray or pretty much any new Sony tech. Sony refused to allow anyone to make a Blu-ray product for *years*. The only way you could get a Blu-ray player was by buying a Sony one. The only reason Blu-ray stuck around at all was because any Sony movie such as the matrix movies and such would *only* be released on Blu-ray, and even then it was failing until they made a gaming console with a Blu-ray player. They refused to let anyone in on it for a long ass time, in fact I'm surprised they ever opened it up to license other companies to use it.\n\nBut yeah, betamax , minidisc, Blu-ray, every Sony tech they won't share in the hopes that they can take over an industry with it. They're basically the Apple of the media industry.", "854" ], [ "definitely a streetable car, I've been going around through forums but I've seen what happens when guys just follow the advice of forums and end up with a mess of a build. Especially since you get a lot of guys with opinions based on numbers without experience, so sometimes they just recommend whatever gives the most power, but you end up with a car that you basically have to get it to 1800RPM-2000RPM before the damn thing starts moving.\n\nI don't want to make the mistake of following the advice of a guy whos giving it from the experience of a drag racer, because I'm not building a strip car. and I know enough to know that you can't have it both ways, the closer you get to making it into a drag car, the farther you'll be from a streetable daily driver.\n\nbut anyways, yes, streetable car, pump gas, I'm looking to build it as a \"weekend car\" since it'll only be driven for a few months a year, I have a dedicated winter vehicle, this is going to be a my fun summer vehicle.", "54" ], [ "Yeah, I love woodworking, and fixing general plumbing and electrical around the house. It's always cool to say \"I made that from scratch\" plus I get to have it be exactly what I want. I'm just worried about doing something like this myself since I would want it to be winch capable and such. I've also been playing with the idea of getting something like a Smitty one and modifying it to my taste, kind of splitting the difference, but the frame tie ins and winch mount are done professionally.", "309" ], [ "the problem with that is, ok I paid $700k for an ocean front property to retire on,I build a house, I spent the last of my money to buy it, in a beautiful island location. it stays there for 5yrs and a hurricane comes and destroys it, up to a few blocks inland. The town/city decides to not rebuild infrastructure in my area because they deem it non-financially viable to continue rebuilding in the area and pull the town/city limit back from the beachfront to higher ground where flooding during hurricanes is less likely to happen.\n\nnow what do I do? what is my property worth? am I still able to sell it? to whom? technically the property is still there and above ground once the hurricane recedes. does the city just now no longer allow beachfront property? where do I live now and how do I recoup costs? if someone pays, who? the insurance company? the city/town?\n\nI agree with your main point, sometimes if the weather continues to destroy property, at what point do you just say , enough is enough. some of these areas were first settled 100yrs ago when we didn't have all the history of regular destruction that we have now to tell them \"hey don't build here unless you want your home destroyed every 5yrs, maybe build a few 100 meters that way on the higher ground\" but at the same time there are so many gritty details about it that its hard to come up with a workable game plan for it.", "69" ], [ "I agree, thats where its headed, to the ranch becoming native land. (*eventually*)\n\nits really the only way I see to finally stop private companies from encroaching on the territory. \n\nthey've made a lot of hints towards \"what person needs this much land?\" and a lot of allusions to how it was originally taken from the natives. As well how <PERSON> and his wife want to live on the land but also the reservation. \n\nI have a feeling it'll be an annexation/donation. They'll make it all reserve land, so the reservation natives can use it for ranching and continuing their way of life, as well as distancing themselves from casinos which Rainwater has also said is his goal.\n\nthat tied with how Rainwater, and <PERSON> don't seem to actually have any real bad blood between them. Sure they're at odds, but only because of the situation. They seem to hold the same general values, and want the same sort of things.\n\nmy guess is in the end <PERSON> is going to die, and all the kids are going to want to give up the land to each other. They'll realize none of them really want it, so they're going to give it back to the reservation on condition that it stays being used for ranching.", "233" ], [ "My guess since season 1 has been that <PERSON> is going to die at the beginning of the last season, possibly at the same time as <PERSON> but I doubt it. \n\nI originally didn't think <PERSON> would survive the series, but lately I've been favoring the idea that <PERSON> is going to, in some way, sacrifice herself for <PERSON>. Possibly leaving him with a child if the series carries on long enough for it to happen. I have a strong feeling that after <PERSON> said something along the lines of, \"god never kills me, only the things that I love\" (paraphrased). That she'll finally get her chance to die for something she loves. This will leave <PERSON> in a similar widower circumstance to <PERSON>. Forever pining for his lost love, and possibly with a child to boot. \n\nThe last season will be the kids fighting about who gets what of the ranch, until the end when they all realize none of them really want the ranch, and they'll annex it to the reserve under condition that it stays a ranch.\n\nKayce and co. will live on the reserve/ranch helping the reservation take over and take care of the ranch. The ranch stays a ranch satisfying <PERSON> wishes, Kayce can be separate of the ranch, the reserve gets more land and in a way that keeps private interests from being able to take it ever again, all the \"city\" family members can go back to the city, the wife /son get to stay as part of the reservation like they wanted. etc. \n\nit seems to tick all the boxes of tragedy and happiness. So thats the theory I'm going with for now", "311" ], [ "I'm actually from Canada, but from what I understand Montana's winters are similar to where I am (-15c to -30c ish during the winter)\n\nI audibly laughed at one scene when they said it was winter and they were outside in just a regular calfskin jacket that they would wear in a summer scene but just with a scarf and pulled a little tighter. \n\nyou are not sitting outside in a rocking chair in -30c weather in just a calfskin jacket and enjoying yourself. past about -25c and the air starts to fucking hurt.", "891" ], [ "I always loved how in shows like CSI, they just pop a sample into a machine, wait 30sec and \"bing\" \"its a match!\"\n\nlol, no. In real life, you take a blood sample, you send it off to a facility to have it DNA tested, and you might hear back in 3 weeks. *maybe* if you get the paperwork to mark it as priority. If not, you're probably waiting 3 months.\n\ncrime scene testing facilities are notoriously backed up.", "1" ], [ "sort of. The lawlessness is slightly exaggerated, the poverty depends on the reservation but is mostly understated. \n\nThere is a certain degree of both in all reservations though. Its true that the disputes between jurisdiction are real. and most reservation police are underfunded, under staffed, and therefore have to let some stuff fall through the cracks. \n\nas well its true that most reservations have a higher percentage of people below the poverty line. \n\nits super hard to generalize though, because each reservation is different. I've seen res where you can't even tell you crossed a boundary into one because its so similar to the town its attached to.\n\nbut I've also seen some where they're basically a shanty town and its like stepping into a war torn country. \n\nit also depends on whos running the reservations. I've seen res's where those in power are crazy rich, and the rest of the res is basically poverty stricken. and some where those in power you wouldn't even notice because they're just like everyone.\n\nthe stories of forced sterilization, \"reservation schools\" where people tried to indoctrinate them/erase their heritage and gave them new names etc. and the general idea of cultural genocide is unfortunately very true, and quite underplayed though. Most of those with native heritage that you might meet these days might be a bit far removed from it. but pretty much every single family has *at least* one family member with a story about these horrific things.", "276" ], [ "> no one sold just the pump itself, they all sold the pump assembly. \n\nIt's rare that we get anyone that wants just the pump. Usually there's enough of a reason to just change the whole thing, and what you pay in part pricing you save in shop time.\n\n > this was the most angry I had ever been at a parts counter guy.\n\nExactly why I warn people before I sell them something like this. It's a mistake you only make once to order the universal style for one of your techs. Especially when they're paid by the job like my first partsman post was. It's one thing to screw up when it's hourly, another to screw up in a way that your tech now loses money today because of your screw up. \n\n > im guessing that the reason they sell you the entire assembly is to avoid just this situation.\n\nThat's exactly why I warn the customer if they're not getting an exact fit part. No parts guy wants to be the one on the other side of the counter in that situation. If frustration is going to be involved, make sure it's the customers choice. That way they can't blame you when they decide to cheap out on the \"universal\" NOX sensor that's $100 cheaper than the exact fit.", "493" ], [ "I didn't really catch on until my early twenties. My middle school and highschool were the same school (grades 7-12) so that same type of BS was pervasive all the way through.\n\nIt wasn't until I was out of HS that I realized, if you just say it confidently and with a smile, and own it, and have a sense of humour about it. There really isn't anything \"too childish\" to be into.\n\nI'm now 31 and I work with mechanics and truckers, and yesterday I was showing off my plex server and telling a guy \"fuck yeah I have reboot on my server! that shit was awesome back in the day. I have 90's spiderman and the clone wars too!\"\n\nit takes awhile, but eventually you realize people can only make fun of you, if you let it get to you. As long as, to you, its not something to be ashamed of. It just makes them look like the immature ass trying to pick on someone.\n\nchances are, if they're friends, theres at least one person there that will back you up because friends are usually into the same sorts of things.\n\nif everyone turns and starts joining in making fun of you, well, chances are these aren't really friends or not the right friends for you.", "339" ], [ "> So many pretend experts that never even hint that they're unsure or speaking hypothetically. They just make statements with an air of absolute certainty, yet they're totally wrong.\n\nreddit is a funny place for that. I'm a partsman by trade, so my usual mindset is to caveat ***everything***, talk ambiguously whenever I can, and try my best to never speak in absolutes whenever possible.\n\nyou'll notice when you talk to a partsguy, they try to *never* give you a straight answer. its always \"***if all goes well*** the part should arrive on this day\", or \"***unless something happens*** I expect it to go like this\", or \"***generally*** this is caused by, or ***usually*** happens like this\"\n\nbut even with all my caveats, and muddy statements, I still get comments all the time of people saying \"Thats not the way it works at my shop you're wrong!\" \n\nsomehow almost everyone on reddit seems to think every generalization ***must*** refer to them personally. and any form of vague statement is proved wrong simply by the fact that its not their personal experience, so therefore its impossible for it to be any different.", "247" ], [ "This can really kick you in the ass too. My parents are dealing with it right now where the first inspector for when they were getting the construction permit said the deck they're rebuilding would still count as a grandfathered installation as long as they don't change the footings or square footage. The second inspector that came in to certify it decided it doesn't count since its all new from the footings up.\n\nThe thing is, the bank behind the house has receded in the 40yrs since the original construction, so now the deck isn't to code for distance from the bank and he says they have to demolish the deck and rebuild. The new code would cut the deck down to 1/3rd the size of the original.\n\nAnd apparently once an inspector cites it as out of code it's next to impossible to reverse.", "623" ], [ "A lot of people mix up stainless steel and Nickle plated steel. They see a polished shine and assume its stainless. But stainless is used on very few products since the addition of chromium lowers its strength considerably.\n\nFor example in automotive we mostly use grade 8 bolts, grade 5 is considered ok if it's not structural, so for like body panels and such. stainless bolts are soft enough that they only go on trim pieces.\n\nYou're not breaking it by hand, but with a normal wrench a toddler could snap the head off of one.\n\nIf that stopper was made with true stainless steel, if you dropped a heavy pot filled with water onto it, it would probably bend.", "304" ], [ "unfortunately not an option, once its been cited for changes and the paperwork has been done for it to be called a new construction its grandfathered status is removed. Getting it reversed is close to impossible, especially with the original already demolished and the \"new\" one already built. it can take months during a good time if they even allow it at all, and because of covid backlogs, its been since the summer of 2019.", "69" ], [ "I mean, its obviously not quite as clear cut as that. There are a ***tonne*** of factors that go into it. but the overarching point that the national deficit isn't as bad or as important as people think it is, and has a lot of wiggle room in a country like america is semi-true. There are times where its actually a good thing to run a larger deficit, and there are times when you want to reign the deficit in.\n\nhowever people seem to think that any deficit is bad. They think of it like they think of their mortgage, as if the country owes someone money and has to keep up payments or they might lose the house. People make statements all the time about how \"america owes china so much money!\" but its not that simple.", "264" ], [ "yeah, like I said in my comment above, people think of the national debt like they think of their mortgage for some reason. Like its a bill that one day might come due, and if you can't pay they'll take the house.\n\nbut thinking that way is like thinking, because money is technically an IOU from the government, that I can show up at the Leg and demand \"payment\" for all the money I have and that I'm \"calling in the debt\" it just doesn't really make sense, and money doesn't work that way and even if it did, what would they \"pay\" me with?\n\nthe national deficit doesn't work like that either. Theres no \"bill\" coming.", "264" ], [ "They did actually look into that, but a retaining wall would have to be about 4 stories tall because of where a solid base could be found and would require a lot of special allowances. They live on the water, and the bank goes down to the beach. A retaining wall would be far too close to the ocean so they fall into the same problem as the deck vs bank distance, they would have a problem with the retaining wall vs ocean distance. You can only build so close to the shore. Plus its a lot harder to get a special allowance to build closer to the ocean than it is to build closer to a bank. You have to have environmental/marine studies done and get an engineer out there. \n\nThey looked into it a bit with their neighbor who owns a construction company, but he said to build a retaining wall that size it would cost a small fortune in construction because they have to install horizontal pilings (not sure what the technical name is when they're horizontal) to anchor the retaining wall into the bank, and the cost to fill would be insane for the amount of material it would need. Plus it would require removing all the foliage on the bank and destroy any privacy/the natural landscape view that they love so much.\n\nat least because of the long wait time, they've gotten to leave the deck up and they've been using it all summer haha.", "69" ], [ "dawww what a cutie, they're so adorable when they're so tiny. Take lots of pictures, they grow quickly and you'll forget how crazy small they start out.\n\nas an aside, I have a Hermanns myself and started out with a similar mix of substrate. when he was a bout a year old he started eating the mulch. I found a stick that was half the length of his body in his poop once and never went back. I switched to just a black earth/soil substrate. It means you have to mix it up and add water more often to keep it moist, and of course dirt/dust, but I find its a better substrate that I don't have to worry as much about.", "173" ], [ "a UVB specific bulb will work, or an MVB bulb will do both UVB and heat.\n\nif your local climate and sun doesn't allow for your torts temperature and light requirements then your tort should have a dedicated heat lamp of some sort (not a heat mat!).\n\nif you go with MVB be careful with the height of the bulb, they can get quite hot. and remember your torts shell is higher than the ground, check the temp at the torts height, not at ground level.", "333" ], [ "I have moved multiple times, a few apartments, and a few condos before I bought my house.\n\nI've never had a landlord consider my tort as a \"pet\" in the housing/apartment rental sense of the word. \n\ngenerally when they would mention its no pets I would awkwardly say \"well I do kind of have a pet, he's just a little tortoise though, he stays in his enclosure most off the time\"\n\nthe usual response was them laughing at me and saying \"no just cats and dogs are a problem\"\n\nusually followed up with asking for pictures or other questions about him, like what does he eat, and how big is he, and whats he like and other curiosity questions.\n\nthe only problem was ever finding an apartment with enough space to fit me, my stuff, and my enclosure. Tortoise enclosures take up a lot of your square footage.", "287" ], [ "Don't forget driving around with their load lights on, and the ultra bright LED's they throw in that they never re-aimed after their lift.\n\nI work in automotive, you wouldn't believe how many guys stand at the counter laughing about how people flash their high beams at them while they drive. It's a point of pride for them.\n\n\"haha, yeah I got those ultra bright LED's they're great! I get guys flashing their highs at me all the time, then I turn on my high beams back and just fucking blind them, Hahaha\"\n\n\"maybe you just need to aim them down a bit\" \n\n\"nah, I checked them on my garage door they look just fine, people just need to stop being pansies. Everyone has brighter headlights these days. You've got to have them or you can't see anything\" \n\nThat's a conversation I get probably 3 times a week. The lack of self reflection is fucking painful.", "449" ], [ "You're right that's definitely a problem I've seen. \n\nBut, I actually don't really ever see aftermarket HID's. Obviously some guys do have them, but it's probably been a year or two since I've seen a set of aftermarket ones. Sometimes factory ones in a Merc or something, but HID's didn't have that long of a hayday and most people are scared off from the high bulb replacement cost. Plus they're finicky as hell with the ballasts, and melted housings and whatnot. \n\nAftermarket LED's are everywhere these days though, so the exact same problems of non-projection lenses you're describing just a different style, and the LED'S these days are about just as bright. I get more vehicles in with aftermarket LED's, than I do stock headlights these days.\n\nSo same duck but by a different name. \n\nBut for some reason people think HID's need all these special things like projection housings and re-aiming, but for whatever reason they don't think LED's have the same requirements.", "362" ], [ "as others have said, thats a break-up and a make-up, different thing. sometimes that shakes people loose.\n\nalso \"time apart\" sometimes works, just spending some time separately from each other, without the option to sleep with other people. sometimes that can work as long as both people understand they have to keep it in their pants because they're still together.\n\na \"break\" however never works. its almost always instituted by one and forced onto the other, and even when its mutual, its generally because somebody has someone in mind that they want to fuck and they're just looking for the moral free ground to get away with it. That way later they can claim \"we were on a break\". Its an excuse to try their hand at someone else, because thats pretty much the only way you're going to agree to your SO having sex with other people, its if you have someone in mind that ***you*** want to have sex with, and you've got blinders on, and you either don't think your SO will do the same, or just simply don't care, both of which mean you've basically checked out of the current relationship.", "901" ], [ "well, your boyfriend is dumb, so hopefully thats ***your*** type. seriously, who is dumb enough to tell his gf that his \"type\" is the polar opposite of her?\n\nthat aside, people can like more than one thing, having a type doesn't mean thats the *only* type that you're interested in. I'm sure you've liked guys with blue eyes, and guys with brown eyes, you might prefer blue, but that doesn't mean you're never going to be attracted to a guy with brown eyes right?\n\nsame same\n\nplus your \"type\" can change over time without even realizing it, I used to be into gingers, when I searched for porn or on tinder, gingers were who I was after. Then I dated a ginger for 7yrs, afterwards now, I'm not turned on by it, it took me awhile to even realize that my tastes had changed, until I realized that porn with gingers didn't get me going anymore.", "591" ], [ "so grow a backbone and tell her it makes you super uncomfortable and this is a hard boundary for you.\n\nyou can't tell her shes not allowed to do it, but you can definitely tell her that if shes going to it'll be as a single girl.\n\nyou're right to not be telling her what she can and can't do, shes an adult, and she doesn't belong to you. but hiding how it makes you feel and just going along with whatever she wants to do without giving your true input is being a doormat. Pony up and tell her how you feel about things because giving her your blessing for whatever she wants to do then secretly harbouring resentment and stewing and stressing over her following through is just shooting yourself in the foot.", "657" ], [ "I don't understand how you can say \"theres hardly any difference\" there are very clear and definite differences in them.\n\na \"break\" assumes you're getting back together its temporary, but you act single, this allows for sex with other partners, this has a predetermined end at a particular time.\n\n\"time apart\" is just that, no acting single, no sleeping with other people, just a little distance to get some perspective.\n\na \"break up\" is exactly that, no predetermined plan to get back together, just straight up separation.\n\nso unless you consider your partner having sex with another person just petty non consequential semantics. Then they are most definitely ***not*** the same thing.\n\n > I don't know who hurt you but it's clear they weren't meant for you if you're that adamant it never works.\n\ndon't try and turn this into you projecting some deep seeded issue onto me, you'll be sorely disappointed all my relationships have been fairly well adjusted and normal. they of course each had their individual problems hence why they didn't work out, but I don't have any deep rooted hang-up's.\n\nyou and your girlfriend broke up, just because you got back together doesn't make it a break, a break would assume that you separated with a predetermined plan to get back together at a particular juncture. you didn't have any such plan. You ***did*** end up getting back together, but that doesn't change what it was when it happened. I also clearly stated that sometimes that ***does*** work. It's only the \"break\" that doesn't.\n\nwords matter, use the appropriate term for the appropriate action and things become less confusing", "813" ], [ "then my only mistake was taking you at your own word\n\n/u/Oh_Kerms \n\n > My gf and I (also a gay relationship) ***broke up*** for a month because I was being an asshat.\n\nthen you didn't \"break up\" you \"went on a break\"\n\nthese aren't terms that get to be defined by the people in the relationship as they see fit after the fact, these are predefined terms used to describe situations. Words mean things.\n\nand I'm not being defensive, I'm being ***corrective***, you're using the wrong words to describe things and then basing advice off of that.", "458" ], [ "looks like you're lacking in your linguistics and your research abilities.\n\nif you want to use urban dictionary *literally* the next one down, isn't a huge story of nonsensical bullshit and it reads:\n\n***When a couple decides to spend time apart without actually breaking up. The duration of the break is decided at the time the break begins.*** During this time their is little or no communication, and the couple spends absolutely NO time together. It is considered rude and nosy to check on the other persons whereabouts or activities and neither person has the right to do so. \"Breaks\" are usually taken after a number of problems within the relationship become to serious for the couple to stay together. Instead of braking up it allows for the opportunity to sort things out and to think about the relationship with the possibility of getting back together. Sometimes breaks are used as an excuse for one person to date around without having to give up the other person. In some cases the parameters of the break are established in such a way that neither party is allowed to date or spend time with someone whom they are sexually attracted to. If the break doesn't include such a rule, then it is each person's option to date and ''see other people'' as they choose. If this is the case then neither person needs to account for their time or actions to the other person in relation to any part of the \"break\" even after the break is over. Essentially the idea of a \"break\" is to momentarily cut all communication that isn't absolutely necessary so there is time to think and decide what needs to happen next: break up for good, or get back together.", "317" ], [ "> Call me uneducated\n\nOk I will: \"you're uneducated\" \n\nyou're trying to argue that a \"break\" a \"break up\" and \"time apart\" are all interchangeable, but its simply not true. You're the one that decided urban dictionary is going to be your reference, then you chose to only use the top definition. Then you chose a definition of nonsense that doesn't even prove your point, then selectively choose to ignore the very next line which proves you entirely wrong. now you're trying to use the fact that I like electronics as some sort of insult? \n\nand now because I can actually back up what I'm saying with logical reasoning I'm an asshole?\n\nI can at least define, definitively what each of these terms mean. You can't even keep straight what you're talking about, and then when you get stuck you resort to trying to project or put me down personally by judging my hobbies.\n\nto quote an uneducated person\n\n\"thanks goodbye\"", "730" ], [ "This sub is hilarious, you could have cock eyed A cups, with more hair than my uncle on her chest and get solid 9's all day. I once dared to vote 7 on a pair of fakes with a little scarring and I ended with -27 votes and 4 different comments from guys cussing me out for low ratings on \"a beautiful woman that's willing to show you her tits for free, how dare you!?\" and all I said was \"nice, 7/10\"", "506" ], [ "I don't know if you're Canadian or American, but as a long time lover of classic cars, from the way you're describing it I'd peg it at around $3k, $5k if the brakes and engine are good enough to have it be running+driving, but from the sounds of it, its running but not driving. It could go as high as $4k if it has anything rare or special about it, but from the sounds of it, its pretty \"normal\" and with the wiring damage I wouldn't pay over $3.5k.\n\nif it was fully restored it might hit $14k, depending on the quality of the resto (paint, how far you went into the suspension, trans rebuild etc.) it could go higher if there are added mods done.", "352" ], [ "Me and my GF are in a similar situation, I was in the process of closing on a house when we met, she's signed on as a tenant of the house. as far as paying rent but gaining no equity.\n\nno sympathy here, you didn't save up the down payment, you didn't have to prove that you had good enough credit to qualify, the mortgage isn't in your name, you don't pay the property taxes, you aren't going to gain or lose money because of a rising or falling market, you're not paying the condo fees, hopefully shes paying more of the expenses to compensate for this or you negotiated reasonable rent. If I were you I would start saving up a nest egg to \"buy in\" to the property, then in 3-5yrs when you two know whether you're going to go the distance or not and shes comfortable with it you have the $20k-$40k or whatever is needed at the time to equal out what she has paid and own half the property. I'm sure you understand there's a lot more that goes into buying a property than just paying the mortgage. \n\nAs well make sure to consider the fact that the more she pays into it, the more equity you're going to have to equal out, you won't just be paying what she paid in down payment and all the sudden getting 50% equity in the property. you'll be paying 1/2 of all the lawyers closing fees, real estate agent costs, ***and*** 50% of the difference between your rent and all the payments shes been making since then. If you want 50% equity you're going to have to pay the 50% of ***all*** the payments shes been making up to that point for it to be fair.\n\nbut as it stands now, you are a tenant, a tenant doesn't gain equity, thats just how it is, and even if you had the money together right now to buy in, I wouldn't blame her for refusing since the relationship is only 8 months right now, and a mortgage is generally around 25yrs.\n\nas for her monopolizing the furnishings and styling of the apartment, thats not fair *at all* she may own the property, but if you're paying your rent on time, then its 50% of your living space as long as you're living there. She has no more claim to the living spaces than you do. \n\nthis should be treated as a roommate/landlord-tenant living situations in all ways, if you ***decide*** to give up more than 50% of the living situation differences then thats your choice, but she has no more of an inherent claim to the living space than you do.\n\nalso keep in mind, if she wants you treated like a tenant (which is my personal recommendation for the moment) then that means shes your landlord and all the ***responsibilities*** that go along with it. That means if the fridge breaks, she should be paying ***100%*** of the cost. You don't own it, you take *no responsibility for it* if the washer breaks, her problem \n\nyour landlord isn't going to ask you pony up a few hundred extra if something breaks or needs attention, she shouldn't either.", "224" ], [ "I can't tell you what to do, but I do want to say it seems you're doing a lot of talking about what she wants, whats right or wrong with her, whether she'll break up with you later etc.\n\nwhat about ***you***, you need to analyze this as to why are ***you*** in the relationship. Sure she might make you feel good to be around, but what do you actually like doing together? does she make you a better person? do you find life is less complicated with her? does she make your life easier?\n\nmaybe its time to stop *reacting* to what shes doing and wanting and saying, and take a minute to analyze how you feel about her and all of this. Take charge of your life, let your wants and needs be known, don't push too hard, you aren't going to get all of them, compromise where you know you need to and if you can't live with the \"deal\" then move on.", "657" ], [ "And you have every right to feel that way, you're not a guest paying rent to stay in her condo you're a roommate, and you deserve to have the place feel like a home to you. She's going to have to make compromises. Maybe start coming up with some things that hardline \"must haves\" and start there. If there are pictures or posters that mean something to you explain the meaning to her and why it's important. In her eyes your stuff is exactly that, just stuff. Impress upon her that some of this is a part of you and you need to be surrounded by the stuff that's important to you.", "698" ] ]
500
[ 21849, 10595, 2708, 4493, 1055, 17558, 20363, 14252, 17315, 868, 7924, 23656, 6745, 16101, 3186, 9041, 7076, 22435, 22647, 24682, 23651, 11619, 17693, 8770, 12847, 14267, 3817, 12594, 6670, 13562, 21941, 10119, 5373, 22824, 10386, 23819, 20701, 10513, 10333, 1126, 9915, 24497, 4839, 16956, 24401, 19496, 2363, 2206, 7125, 540, 23028, 18263, 12834, 7515, 14488, 25044, 3105, 24220, 1785, 22670, 2216, 10802, 17783, 24130, 16893, 18136, 24845, 7579, 19869, 18445, 18095, 1765, 4539, 22577, 3444, 15405, 5551, 24471, 25180, 2880, 21023, 20153, 21623, 25004, 21217, 19452, 14332, 8190, 2349, 7193, 17373, 11532, 7280, 5390, 22667, 21783, 13867, 16558, 13014, 8435, 16727, 556, 11388, 21811, 9221, 6028, 20457, 15002, 6654, 19658, 11838, 15568, 12500, 11996, 2078, 14261, 10462, 14969, 13410, 18496, 2635, 17870, 16078, 17759, 19701, 15198, 12446, 15707, 15489, 4054, 23055, 1044, 1857, 18737, 12005, 25258, 19796, 8518, 12545, 9022, 15529, 11965, 12955, 11570, 1800, 23533, 594, 12306, 21036, 25507, 24122, 14671, 6569, 4507, 13275, 11526, 3520, 17883, 19358, 3844, 9712, 10710, 9627, 17564, 16902, 4368, 2394, 7465, 3792, 15296, 2338, 12143, 9448, 3531, 14230, 14666, 14022, 7516, 14105, 1614, 16912, 10707, 6519, 18130, 6153, 23462, 24449, 20210, 8216, 21058, 5191, 19679, 23172, 22225, 3410, 3097, 9643, 23496, 24835, 23054, 17484, 4884, 22740, 23910, 25435, 1469, 17172, 16247, 12120, 23029, 6371, 7810, 17945, 2492, 4576, 23313, 21260, 10085, 3075, 15820, 14925, 6265, 1112, 16908, 10870, 796, 18092, 1998, 20365, 22229, 1002, 22079, 11461, 6109, 12491, 2332, 313, 7653, 21582, 18498, 17433, 4711, 15842, 3077, 24074, 25174, 20478, 22421, 14863, 3691, 13239, 16668, 9691, 17464, 21958, 5874, 19922, 15826, 18349, 24490, 3893, 8637, 20248, 3153, 3664, 2, 911, 21220, 15981, 8307, 21843, 1593, 11197, 9958, 1057, 4892, 24275, 21096, 2504, 18003, 2993, 11758, 16428, 13954, 12026, 18266, 20395, 5077, 16267, 4971, 8155, 12251, 3704, 15166, 10323, 11946, 1960, 15603, 3806, 6529, 19405, 6237, 21562, 4451, 18999, 1463, 20709, 12070, 21248, 16513, 16067, 25538, 8648, 2885, 20421, 15031, 14188, 12921, 3310, 6652, 18365, 7456, 11839, 10148, 3500, 84, 25347, 19549, 11496, 24214, 12590, 15412, 18098, 5701, 23577, 4748, 20428, 14763, 24868, 14896, 14494, 9611, 9708, 6669, 23291, 16283, 25041, 22851, 11865, 6681, 10845, 22988, 7228, 11452, 7783, 15034, 4735, 22505, 16425, 19592, 14436, 16130, 6686, 13382, 19169, 25071, 16549, 9389, 13374, 10436, 21957, 11891, 15760, 14011, 16108, 8160, 20106, 9809, 11834, 9253, 9151, 13095, 2748, 15207, 13516, 1456, 25037, 14804, 21372, 4197, 3512, 3449, 24092, 759, 4216, 17026, 251, 19116, 17537, 15714, 18754, 10838, 25343, 9446, 742, 23914, 5461, 681, 3288, 12145, 3313, 5635, 1636, 25242, 9124, 6600, 8908, 8063, 1226, 849, 22206, 7781, 2375, 12185, 22976, 7625, 7034, 995, 21137, 10667, 16233, 12819, 715, 13288, 19516, 7002, 9551, 21350, 18481, 9103, 8095, 17298, 22394, 19032, 14819, 4704, 3653, 21449, 110, 7257, 3483, 16871, 2577, 20267, 13552, 5300, 19086, 14750, 24064, 10614, 21033, 16817, 1375, 14080, 18197, 15579, 24463, 2510, 10228, 8579, 17253, 24107, 4851, 24478, 15271, 10961, 17406, 18074, 3131, 3169, 21496, 19756, 11778, 1258, 3787, 10151, 4170, 2074, 23036, 1663, 8358, 19676, 3815, 17215, 1736, 3011, 4387, 12720, 23353 ]
reddit_dump_-rwsr-xr-x
[ [ "Best solution of course, is to make sure you set up automation to play Law & Order or True Crime episodes within audio range of your smart speaker when you're away. \n\nOr use one of the modified kits that *physically disconnect the mic* on these smart devices, until you activate it for listen mode. \n\nThere are a few security-minded companies already allowing you to send in your Echo/Google Home device and they'll alter it for you and send it back with the mic disconnected and under user-managed control.\n\nThis link will also allow you to completely disable storing any recordings or metadata, telemetry from your Amazon devices. \n\n_URL_1_\n\nI found it after reading this article, and all of my settings were already disabled/off, and I had no voice history at all showing in the app or settings. \n\nNow, if I have no voice history and those settings are disabled, and the police still obtain recordings, or are able to remotely turn it on 'live' and listen-in, or use [parallel construction](_URL_0_) to justify how they obtained any recordings after they've *always* been disabled, they'll have some serious explaining to do.", "672" ], [ "> I don’t think just pushing the mute button helps. There’s nothing that guarantee us that the device is not listening unless there is no power to it.\n\nThey're working on that too. MIT demonstrated remotely powering up devices, even just momentarily, using ambient WiFi signals in the area near the device. \n\nAndroid and iOS devices have also already been caught staying \"on\" while the device pretended to be powered off (literally choosing the \"Power Off\" option, no screen, no LEDs, implying to the user that the device was powered off, yet it wasn't, and was still gathering and storing precise location data). \n\nThere's a reason devices now have an integrated battery, vs. the much cheaper, more serviceable user-replaceable batteries that we had only a few years ago: To prevent devices from being *physically powered off* by battery removal. \n\nThe solution? Get yourself a Faraday bag. I've been using them for years, and they work great! \n\nDon't trust the switch, LED or screen/icon indicators that your device is in a given state. Trust, but Verify, is our credo. \n\nIf you can't verify, then use a secondary means to ensure the security of the device. \n\nIf it has a mic, use a dummy 3.5mm audio cable (oops, look at that, they're removing those too, also not because of customer pressure or thinning of devices, but so you can't bypass the audio). Or put the device into a sealed container with no external audio possible (eg: an ammo box or jar with soundproofing foam inside). \n\nIf it has sensors, radios (gps, bluetooth, wifi, data network), then drop it into a Faraday bag. \n\nIf it has a camera, obscure the camera/cover the lens. For under-screen cameras, make sure you use a folio-style case that covers the camera when closed (\"book\" style).", "672" ], [ "> A stingray is a device used by law enforcement that tricks your phone into thinking its talking to an actual cell tower. This is passed on to a real tower, so someone on the street would never notice an issue with their connection. \n\nDisabling 2G fallback on your phone is one preventative measure you can use to prevent this, as is using a tool like [AIMSICD](_URL_0_), to detect when your phone requests switching to a 'tower' that is not identifying itself as being owned by the telcos your phone supports. \n\nThey also did this for many of the BLM protests, with low-flying helos that the crowds incorrectly misinterpreted as trying to disperse them with chopper blade winds, but was actually used to gather dense IMSI data from protester's mobile devices in the crowds of protesters, so they could track down who was there, who was transmitting data to whom, and who was connected to whom during and after the protests.\n\nAlso, if you don't already use a SIM card lock (pin) on your device, set that up *immediately*. Any attempt to clone and re-use your SIM elsewhere, would be delayed/prevented by using a pin code. 3 wrong attempts at the pin code, disables the SIM, and the telco can track where it was used and which towers were in range when it was disabled.", "443" ], [ "> Your phone thinks a stingray is. \n\nThe only reason it thinks so, is \n\n1. Because you permit your phone to connect to \"stronger-powered\" devices (you can prevent this)\n2. You allow your device to fall back to 2G, unencrypted communications with that \"stronger tower\"\n\nDisable 2G (and 3G if possible) on your device, and lock it down so it can only use towers already known to belong to the telco, not just the closest or strongest signal. \n\nAlso, secure your phone's SIM with a pin code, so any attempt to clone your SIM and reuse it in another remote device, would be thwarted if they tried more than 3 times with the wrong code. \n\n > It's legal, but very loosely.\n\nActually, not legal at all. That's why police departments and federal agencies are all using [Parallel Construction](_URL_0_) to hide their use of the Stingray devices. It's a direct violation of FCC regulations, even if you're also the .gov or a police department using it.", "443" ], [ "> Even if they did, the metadata like phone number and imei would still be visibile. That alone is enough to create a target list when you attend a protest.\n\n\"[Full tower dumps](_URL_0_)\" are becoming increasingly popular, and when police use [Parallel Construction](_URL_1_) to justify requesting those dumps, with the real intent on getting a full list of the thousands of devices connected to the towers at any given time, they get a LOT more data than they should be given access to.", "779" ], [ "> Don’t bring your phone to a protest **or put it in airplane mode**!\n\nAirplane mode is irrelevant, when the device is still requesting and storing precise location data, which is then transmitted later when you're back on any network. Android and iOS devices have both been caught doing this in Airplane Mode, as well as when \"Powered off\". \n\nDon't trust what the UI is telling you, in many to most cases, it's lying. \n\nGet a Faraday bag, or don't bring the device with you.", "697" ], [ "> You can't know someone was involved in something like this from phone data alone. You can only know proximity.\n\nNot really.. Since most people blindly (and terrifyingly) keep Bluetooth, WiFi and GPS/Location Services enabled, you can get *incredibly precise* positioning of the device at any given moment, remotely. \n\nYou can tell, within a range of about a meter, where that device was, and whether that device was within range of other devices in the same vicinity, via BLE beacons. You can do this all without user knowledge or consent. \n\nIt's not just about \"These 4,000 devices were all connected to Tower-A at 11:00pm\", but \"These 500 devices were all on this same city block between 11:00pm and 11:17pm\"", "443" ], [ "> Especially not your primary one!\n\nPrimary, backup or burner, it won't matter, since all of those are tied to a single human being now anyway. \n\nEven burner phones now require presenting a driver's license to purchase, and cannot be purchased with cash anymore. You must have a valid ID and a credit card to buy one.", "927" ], [ "> If I said \"Sorry, I don't carry a phone\" to my boss, he'd probably tell me to get a phone or find a new job.\n\nDoes you talk to your boss on the phone *that often* to justify that extreme response? If so, he should be providing you with a business phone, which you expense the use of and it gets turned off after your work day ends, and turned back on the next day when it begins again.", "882" ], [ "> How is that even possible? It's not! GPS data might transmitted to, say Google, via an internet connection after you turn off flight mode, but that data is usually encrypted.\n\nThe use of the GPS radio does not require any data access or cell signal for that matter. \n\nOn Android devices, there are 3 modes, GPS (\"coarse\" positioning), and 2 aGPS modes (which requires WiFi to enhance precision, by comparing your location data to neighboring WiFi hotspots that Google has mapped on their own via Street View routes). \n\nYour device can activate and gather GPS all day long, while in Airplane Mode. There are even navigation apps like OSMand that use offline maps and disconnected GPS support to function. \n\nThis video from several years ago might also provide some context: \n\n_URL_0_", "443" ], [ "> In any case, you need the locations of the cell towers / wifi networks around you. Where do you get that list of locations from? From Google / Apple. If you don't have that list on your phone, you won't be able to use aGPS without an internet connection.\n\nI think you've missed the point there. You don't need Internet access at the time the data is gathered. Your phone isn't going to stay in Airplane Mode forever, is it? \n\nOnce you re-enable a data network, eg: join a WiFi network or enable your mobile data, that data will be transmitted (as the video I linked shows), and the GPS coordinates and WiFi SSIDs your device was in proximity of, are unioned together with what Google already knows from its Street View drivers, and creates a timeline of where your device was, for how long, and at what speed (walking, driving, etc.) while it was in Airplane Mode.", "697" ], [ "> I’ve also heard that far right groups have seeded rowdy and violent protestors within rally’s to create a bad images for groups like BLM\n\nDon't forget the \"Magical Brick Fairy\" too, dropping off pallets of bricks directly in line where the police were forcing protesters to egress. \n\nIn Hong Kong, the protesters there were taking the bricks and instead of using them to smash windows and cars, [they built little towers in the road](_URL_0_), so the police vehicles couldn't accelerate and run them down.", "577" ], [ "> Your phone will always connect to the “strongest“ tower that is available for it. Interception devices will pretend to be a tower of your network with good reception, so your phone will connect\n\nAs the links I've previously provided show, you can prevent your phone from doing this, when it attaches to an unrecognized tower. Please read the links and project page to understand how it works. \n\nFor those with the less-secure, less configurable iOS devices, this may not be possible, but if you're after security and privacy, you wouldn't choose to use one of those devices anyway. \n\nI have personal, first-hand knowledge of this, because I have seen Stingray devices in use in NYC (it's saturated with them now). \n\nAfter many, many years of prior trips to NYC, my phone knows where the actual towers are, so any 'rogue' tower positions that claim to be a valid tower and show up as 'new', are ignored and my phone drops mobile data when in their presence.", "927" ], [ "> then you later turn it back on that even if Google gets it that info, the FBI’s Stingray device won’t get it.\n\nMore than the FBI are using Stingray devices, local police departments are using them as well. NYC has several deployed and has had them in service for the last few years, large sections of lower Manhattan are saturated. \n\nBut it doesn't matter anyway, the FBI (via the NSA) will get the location data anyway, through [Five-Eyes agreements](_URL_0_), once your device is back on the network and reports its location data to Google/Apple. \n\nBetween tower dumps, Stingray devices, Five-Eyes agreements and Parallel Construction to hide SIM cloning and other data interception, they're going to get the data anyway. \n\nAlso, any photos you may take during the time your device is in Airplane Mode, will have EXIF data that includes not only location tags, but also can have image analysis run on them to determine where you are/were, when the photo was taken. \n\nMicrosoft had a program almost a decade ago, that took community photos from every angle at popular tourist areas, seamed them together and created a full 3D view of these locations (like detailed walkthroughs of the inside of large churches or major monuments). \n\nThe technology makes it incredibly easy and accessible, the legal loopholes make it impossible to prevent, and the implicit trust too many people put in their devices being truthful with the user's intent, misleads too many into believing they're \"anonymous\". \n\nThey're nothing but.", "697" ], [ "> But isn't cell signal required for the device to pick up any info from your phone? \n\nAlmost. If your phone is in Airplane Mode, any nearby phone that happens to have cell signal if both have Bluetooth on (eg: BLE beacons can be received), then the other phones can report it was in proximity to your device, while that second phone is communicating through the Stingray. \n\nIf you block any and all radios (and they're almost all SoC these days, not discrete chips per-radio), you'll be in better shape. That includes NFC, Bluetooth, WiFi, GPS and mobile network. \n\nMany people carelessly leave WiFi and Bluetooth on at all times, even when they're not using them, which leaves your phone incredibly vulnerable to inspection from neighboring sources. \n\n > It was my understanding that they acted like a man in the middle between your phone and the cell mast.\n\nThey just present a \"stronger\" signal to connect to, so your device (by default) prefers to connect to the stronger tower, eg: the Stingray. \n\n > So it wouldn't matter what your phone is recording if it has no cell signal.\n\nRight, they won't get your data directly through the Stingray capture, but they'll get its location data afterwards, when you're back at your flat and switch Airplane Mode off. \n\nAt that point, your phone transmits its stored location datapoints back upstream to Google/Apple, where the agencies can request it through other legal (eg: tower dumps, Five-Eyes agreements) or loophole (eg: parallel construction) methods.", "443" ], [ "The money earned from that rise in productivity is going somewhere, let’s see a visualization of that, overlaid with the flattening of wages. \n\nWhile millions of people were furloughed or lost their jobs completely during this pandemic, wealth of the top 1% grew staggeringly fast, $42 billion per week during the peak of job losses for the top 600 richest Americans. \n\n* _URL_0_\n\n* _URL_1_\n\n* _URL_2_\n\nThe total wealth of American billionaires has grown by nearly a quarter, from just under $3 trillion to $3.66 trillion since the pandemic lockdown began. \n\nHow is that even possible, if the money is already there to be disbursed to others but not being shared in times of downturn?", "580" ], [ "> \tYeah, no. Nice FUD, that would completely nuke the battery in a few hours.\n\nNo, it does not. \n\nThe SoC for the radios in modern phones are incredibly power efficient, and with device deep sleep states you can go a long, long time before needing a charge. The screen is the biggest battery drain there is and with that off, simulating a power off state, you’ll go days before needing to top off. \n\nMy personal Android daily driver device goes a full 3+ days between charges, and that’s with active to moderate usage patterns and data/WiFi enabled, listening to podcasts, fetching mail, using other apps. My iOS device, even with its aggressive phone home frequency, still goes a good 36 hours between charges. \n\nIf I cut the screen-on time to zero, turned off background data for those chatty apps and left only the critical location tracking and phone home services, it would last even longer. \n\nI’m not sure what you’re doing with your device or what it’s doing, but modern mobile devices are easily capable of 1-2 days per charge, unless you’re spending 8 hours a day on the device with the screen turned on.", "706" ], [ "> \tThe odds of an unregistered nuclear device getting that close to the continental US is almost zero.\n\nThey don’t need ICBMs at all. \n\nHere’s a thought exercise: \n\nWith the frighteningly high amount of missing/stolen uranium around the world that can’t be located, all it would take is a small, tactical, dirty nuke in a suitcase in Manhattan to shut down NY and surrounding boroughs for the next 40 years. \n\nSince we don’t know where any of the missing uranium is, portions of it may very well already be within our borders. \n\nThink 9/11 caused a ripple in our economy and loss of life? Imagine NYC, the financial nucleus of our economy being wiped out along with 18+ million citizens and quarantined for over 4 decades.", "470" ], [ "> \tThere would be blackouts, maybe half the country. Maybe for a few weeks. But the entire country wouldn’t fall back to the 16th century. There would definitely be turmoil for possibly hundreds of millions of people, far worse than Covid. \n\nI think you may be underestimating the amount of damage an EMP can do. Even a modest EMP will take out vehicles, computers, phones, infrastructure, PLCs that run equipment, relays, sensors. \n\nThat means electronic door locks to your work or apartment fail, cars dead on the road, cell service down (and down for weeks to months). No laptop, no phone, no cell, no DSL or cable modems, no cars, no computers... for a very large radius from the EMP epicenter. \n\nIf they targeted power or utility Infrastructre, that means no food supply can be brought in, no access to digital funds via ATM or credit cards (how do you pay for food at the market with no power and no way to restock because the roads are blocked by hundreds of abandoned, dead vehicles?) and the delivery vehicles and inventory systems are also down. \n\nThere aren’t enough HAM licensed people in every area with EMF isolated and protected gear around to tie the communities severed by an EMP back together. \n\nNo, not down for weeks. Likely several months to years, depending on the severity and need for rebuilding or restocking parts that suddenly take months to build and become the highest in demand. Those surplus parts don’t exist at all today. \n\nMontreal was hit with a “small” solar flare in the late 1980s that [wiped them out for 12 hours and impacted 96 separate utilities and 200 power grid problems from US coast to coast within minutes](_URL_0_) \n\nThat was well before every little device had its own microprocessor and IoT devices connected everything to everything.\n\nA handful of coordinated, targeted EMP strikes executed stateside would be devastating for our country.", "270" ], [ "> \tIf I remember right, we had one barely miss earth a few years back.\n\nIt didn’t miss, if wiped out power in Montreal for a sustained period and caused interruption to 96 electrical utilities in New England within minutes and a ripple effect of 200 power grid problems from US coast to coast. That was a minor event. \n\n_URL_0_", "270" ], [ "Many people don’t realize that if you earn less than $69,000 gross income, your tax preparation is 100% free. You don’t have to pay to have your taxes prepared or filed. \n\nI’ve hired an accountant years ago to do my taxes and I would never go back. Not only are they up to date on all of the new, complex tax laws that change year over year, but they’re legally liable for the accuracy of the filing. \n\nThis includes the new laws with caps on claimed exemptions, cross state credits/taxes when working in other states, alternating child dependency exemptions in alternating years, claiming home office space and Internet when working from home (will be critical when filing 2020 taxes since many of us are exclusively working from home), and many others. \n\nThe point and click tax filing software doesn’t catch all of the nuances that a skilled accountant can. They’re on your side, not on the side of increasing software revenue margins.", "51" ], [ "> \tWhat about supporting legislation to pay for slightly more police training?\n\nHaving an advanced education in social justice, a license to practice and CEUs that have to be renewed and maintained each year like many other levels of licensure would be a great start. \n\nWe do this for doctors, mental health therapists, massage therapists, lawyers, anesthesiologists, plumbers, electricians, sports coaches and dozens of other fields. \n\nI would hope that a job that requires carrying weapons of lethal force and puts themselves and others in danger every day, should absolutely be licensed to practice, have a degree in recognizing and negotiating complex social issues and be required to regularly update that training through re-education.", "582" ], [ "They do not support macOS, not any recent versions after 2017 anyway. \n\nMy 23-key Koolertron came in today, and I've hit nothing but dead-ends trying to program it using a Windows VM on my Linux machine, or natively on macOS (their software doesn't support anything newer than Sierra). \n\nIt doesn't matter what ports your device has, if it's running macOS, you're out of luck. \n\nUnless you have Windows 10 running on a baremetal host somewhere that you can run their 'amag' software on, or a somewhat ancient Mac OS X machine with USB-A ports, you're dead in the water. \n\nLook for another product from a vendor that has demonstrated support for modern hardware and with software that runs on an OS that is current/recent.\n\nMine is going right back in the box for a return, less than 1 hour after opening it.", "689" ], [ "> We the ~~consumer~~ **customer** are going to get nickel and dimed.\n\nThere, FTFY. \n\nWe really need to stop using the word \"consumer\" across the board, because it just validates their policies that are not focused on the customer but focused on the profits. \n\nWe do not *consume* their services like some endlessly hungry animal, we **pay for them**, and that makes us their customer. \n\nIn exchange, we: \n\n- require that our personal data not be sold, stolen or traded, and\n- expect that we will receive fair services for our money, and\n- expect that when services are down, we will recoup a prorated amount commensurate with the outage timeframe, and\n- expect that we will have a voice in all decisions that impact our ability to use the service, and \n- expect that there will be a fair market to choose the supplier of the services we pay for, to ensure good competition and no monopolistic behaviors. \n\nWe are the **customer**, not the consumer.", "717" ], [ "> According to Oxford Dictioary a consumer is a person who purchases goods and services for personal use.\n\nAs we've learned over the years, the OED and the social misuse of the terms, rarely agree. \n\nA '[hacker](_URL_0_)' for example, is almost always deemed a criminal in today's context, but without hackers like myself and millions of others, technology like radio transmitters, television, Internet, solid state storage, self-driving cars and so on, would not exist. \n\nUntil these companies start treating us as their *customer*, the word *consumer* will continue to have a different meaning.", "157" ], [ "> If we completely ignore the dictionary definition of consumer, you're right\n\nIt's true, *WE* don't ignore those definitions, but the companies who use the term 'consumer', view the definition more like the [battery scene from the Matrix](_URL_1_). \n\nWe don't exist in partnership with the companies we purchase services or products from, we exist purely to line their wallets. They rarely, if ever, ask for our input on decisions that impact us, and widen their margins. Wood pulp in cheese? Sure, let's have more of that. 60% sugar in each serving size of Nutella? Why not. 40% high fructose corn syrup in \"all natural jelly\"? What could be wrong with that? Mislabeling the origin of meats and poultry we consume, to obscure its origin from tainted farms? Yes, I'm sure all the customers voted for that one too. \n\n[Shrinkflation](_URL_0_) would not exist, if the customer was an important part of the decision to reduce quantity and double the price, or put fillers in foods that are known to cause GI, brain and blood health issues, reformulating products with cheaper ingredients that can increase margins even further.\n\nHave you seen the paperback-book-sized cereal boxes of food lately, selling at prices 1.5x the cost of their previously larger counterparts? It's across the board from shampoos to cookies to energy bars and Pop-Tarts. \n\nIf all we are is a 'consumer' (by *their* definition, not OED), then we exist purely to line up at the door and willingly give our hard-earned money to companies to keep them alive, not because we need their products or services, but because *WE* care about *their* survival. \n\nBut the OED and literal definition is quite a bit different in practice, vs. spirit. \n\nThat was my point. I'm not suggesting we try to change the *definition* of the word, that is correct and accurate, I'm suggesting we change the *corporate interpretation* of the definition.", "976" ], [ "> Then 7 days later Amazon enabled the feature, meaning everyone who had previously thought this was disabled already on their end now had it unknowingly turned on.\n\nAdmittedly, their app design and the wording of their email could have been a bit more clear about that. With the slider initially in the 'off' position in the app, many probably assumed this meant \"disabled\", not the true meaning of \"Not rolled out and enabled yet\", so they didn't feel the need to check it. \n\nDay later, when the service was rolled out and that feature toggled from \"Unavailable\" to \"Enabled\", many probably thought their previous option to keep it turned off, was reverted. It wasn't. \n\nWhat they should have done, was add a checkbox near the slider that the user has to check, to opt-out, labeled something like: \"Do not opt me into this service when it becomes available in my area\". \n\nThat way, from a backend development standpoint, anyone who did not check that box, implicitly allows themselves to be enabled for the service (slider in the 'Unavailable' position to start with). Those who checked the box, you can ensure the slider doesn't move to the 'Enabled' position. \n\nWithout that secondary checkbox, if you ran a query to say: \"Enable all Sidewalk users in Area-12345 who have the option in the default 'Unavailable' position\", you'd get everybody. \n\nAlternately, even with the service unavailable in certain areas, a default *opt-in* stance, would allow users to move that sllder to the 'Enabled' position, even if Sidewalk hadn't been rolled out yet. It would just be a no-op, until services were made available. \n\nSo #FAIL on Amazon's part, poor wording and app design. I can see how this is confusing to end users, but without some bit to query that allows knowing one of the following, it's near impossible to get the correct state of that option: \n\n1. This user chose to opt out (explicit deny)\n2. This user chose to enable the service (explicit allow)\n3. This user did nothing (implicit allow, or prompt for action)", "707" ], [ "> \tonce this is over, you will have the antibodies just like those who got the vaccine\n\nThose antibodies last up to 3 months and are only effective against exposure the strain of SARS-CoV-2 that triggered your body to produce them. Other strains you come in contact with would be unaffected. \n\nThere are hundreds of strains now and we don’t have a way to track down which antibodies are effective against which strains yet. \n\nNobody has developed a confirmed immunity yet, out of the 63 million global cases. \n\nWe still have 5+ billion more people on the planet not exposed or recorded as being exposed, so there’s many years of this left to go, before we have enough to have a really solid chance at developing broad immunity.", "235" ], [ "> \t... but the scientific community has been clear for months now for the overwhelming majority of people that have had COVID immunity will last for a very long time (some even think years/decades based on similar viruses).\n\nThat’s definitely odd because front-line healthcare workers are seeing reinfection and re-hospitalization rates of prior patients 2-3 months after they’ve been treated and released, climbing back up again. \n\nThere’s a HUGE amount of variability in how people respond to treatment and how their own immune systems respond in the presence of a viral load sufficient enough to trigger the body’s immune response. \n\nWe’ve had the flu vaccines since the 1940s and people haven’t yet developed an immunity to that either, after decades of annual inoculations. \n\nA single exposure to SARS-CoV-2 that triggers the body to produce antibodies proven to be effective for years/decades, would be an epidemiological unicorn.", "235" ], [ "> \tEdit: I get it, my mistake, I thought it was happening more often.\n\nReinfection rates *are* climbing, and anecdotal evidence shows that the antibodies become ineffective after about 3 months. \n\nThere’s a very large and growing number of strains of SARS-CoV-2 out there and it’s not predictable which one you may come in contact with, or several, in an amount that triggers your body to produce enough antibodies to sustain months to years of protection against *that* strain.", "235" ], [ "> \t\"More than 38 million people worldwide have been infected with the coronavirus, and as of Monday, fewer than five of those cases have been confirmed by scientists to be reinfections.\n\nI’m not sure how many months old those numbers are, but we’re at almost double those numbers now at 63.5 million infected with 45 million people listed as “recovered” from their initial exposure. \n\nReinfection numbers are climbing, but it’s hard to determine the rate since we don’t have good testing for all of the hundreds of independent strains of SARS-CoV-2 out there. \n\nHealthcare workers have been seeing previously released patients showing back up in the ICU with COVID-positive symptoms again 2-3 months after their first bout in the hospital.", "266" ], [ "> \tNah see you can't just say it concretely like that. \n\n[...]\n\n > \tMost people who get COVID will get through it fine and won't have any long term effects.\n\nYou just contradicted yourself there. \n\nSo far, only 0.82% of the global population (65 million) has registered an exposure to this virus, and that sample size is way, WAY too small to make any sweeping generalizations about the long term impacts of this virus, when 99% of the worlds population hasn’t confirmed their own exposure. \n\nEven the WHOs numbers claiming 10% of the global population has contracted an exposure to SARS-CoV-2, means a much greater percentage probably haven’t been exposed, than do. \n\nWe have many, many years left fighting this virus before we can finally say we have any accurate data about its epidemiological impacts on the human immune system.\n\nWe’ve been studying and vaccinating people against the seasonal flu since the 1940s, and we still don’t have a confirmed cure for that virus either, so each year we get inoculated with a different, annually changing cocktail of antibodies in an effort to help our bodies fight that off. \n\nLet’s be careful with using statements like *“Most people...”* when your sample size is less than 1%.", "235" ], [ "> They've thought about it and they're proud of what these guys did\n\nThe odd hypocrisy is that these same people cry \"Muh freedoms!\" when they're told to wear a mask, and get violent when they can't adhere to the rules of a private business, and at the same time, are violently fighting to establish a Fascist regime here in the US. \n\nThe two don't normally go together. Demand your freedoms, by pushing for a rule of government that guarantees you have none.", "651" ], [ "> They actually sideswiped one of the vans that was escorting the bus, none the less still fucked up practically attempted man slaughter.\n\nI'm not taking sides on this one, but it certainly looks to me, like that white SUV was in the trucks lane, half-way, and the truck pushed it back into its own lane. \n\nWas the white SUV forced into the truck's lane by someone to their left, off-camera? Because it does look like they instigated that pushback.", "449" ], [ "> In the united states, if someone enters your lane and you intentially drive your car into them and push them back into their previous lane you are at fault, you hit them end of discussion.\n\nAfter looking at the expanded video coverage of that incident, in this case, the white SUV was legally in their lane, directly behind the bus, the black truck was behind the SUV, then circled to the white SUV's right, pushing it out of the lane, taking up its own position directly behind the campaign bus. \n\nThe black truck was 100% clearly in the wrong, and aggressively road-raged a vehicle legally in its own lane, out of the lane, putting lives at risk, not only in the white SUV, but other vehicles nearby who could have caused an accident as well.", "449" ], [ "> Also look into the state tenant laws regarding security deposits. If they don't give it within a certain amount of days, the former tenant is due extra money for compensation for the delay.\n\nSome states also require that the security deposit be held in an interest-bearing escrow account, so the final repayment *cannot* be from the landlord's own personal checking account (and thus, cannot \"bounce\", since the money is always present in escrow).\n\nIn those states, when your security deposit is returned, you get the full deposit + any interest gained on that deposit, delivered to you via a check drawn directly from the escrow account.", "790" ], [ "> Oh man those “God given right to breathe oxygen” idiots don’t even have the Pope on their side ...\n\nYou have all the rights in the world to breathe the oxygen produced by algae in the ocean and trees, but you *don't* have the right to exhale deadly viral particulates back into the atmosphere the rest of us have to breathe.\n\nMasks help both the wearer and others, by reducing the amount of foreign particulates, in particular droplets carrying a deadly virus, from entering the respiratory airway of people nearby. \n\n* If you increase the distance, you reduce the risk. \n* If you wear a mask, you filter what enters (or exits) your respiratory airway. \n* If you sterilize your hands, surfaces you touch, you reduce the chance the virus will be picked up and transported to someone else's airway or mucous membranes (eyes, nose, mouth). \n\nWhy people still struggle to put these concepts together, still eludes me.", "80" ], [ "> Unfortunately, in the US at least, a great majority of those people probably don't recognize the authority (or wisdom) of the Pope, even if they're supposed to.\n\nLet's be fair, they also don't recognize the authority or wisdom of degreed scientists, viral epidemiologists who have studied these viruses for decades, pharmaceutical lab engineers who are working on a vaccine, the head of the CDC and tens of millions of healthcare workers struggling with patients dying from this virus every single day. \n\nWhat they *do* believe, is that one post that their sister's grandmother found online and posted to Facebook. ***That*** is taken as irrefutable fact.", "19" ], [ "> They absolutely refuse to wear a mask because it's a Chinese hoax\n\nWell, that \"Chinese hoax\" is about to start costing people who don't wear a mask, a steep fine and jail time. Many states are getting onboard with stiff and steep penalties for failure to wear a mask, wear it properly and limit assembly of large crowds. \n\nThey can claim Chinese hoax all they want, and they can think it over in a jail cell while they wait to get bonded out and present their case in court, where they'll be *forced* to wear a mask, and argue down their fine for refusing to wear their mask.", "855" ], [ "> People are just selfish as hell..\n\nSelfish is now becoming expensive, as states impose fines for failure to wear a mask, and arresting offenders who refuse to wear one. Don't wear your mask? Can't shop here. Sorry, you'll have to travel 25 miles to the next supermarket who doesn't have this state's policy about masks. \n\nNow when you go to get your next job and they run a background check and find your arrest record, you may be passed over. \n\nThere are significant, lasting impacts to poor choices, and it's obvious that many people who refuse to wear a mask, really have thought out the long-term results of that poor decision.", "855" ], [ "The two most-important tools you'll need, can't fit in that BoB, and can't be bought on Amazon. \n\n* Your health, sanity, wits and wisdom \n* A plan\n\nMost people fail to pack both of those when they prep. \n\nIf you don't have a contacts list, a plan of where you'll go, which direction, under what conditions, you'll end up recalculating hour by hour, and never survive the Zombie Apocalypse.\n\nIf you don't keep your sanity, wits and health about you, you'll never make it through the first 25 miles of hiking through back yards and forest. You need stamina, clarity of thought, rest and focus to push ahead. \n\nThere are other basic items you'll need of course: \n\n* Buried caches of items along your route, to re-pack and restock as you go. You're not going to carry 2 weeks of food and 75 pounds of supplies on your back while hiking 25+ miles per-day, are you? \n* A sewing kit, because in many cases the clothes you're wearing or carrying are also your shelter and protection from the elements. One you tear your pants or jacket wide open, what do you do then? \n* Anti-bacterial/anti-diarrhea medicines, since you'll be living on foods that fit in a bag, not a microwave, so your digestive system may not do well on a week of energy bars or military rations. You need to make sure you're hearty enough to endure the elements, less caloric intake, less natural and more processed foods, until you reach a safe destination. \n\nThere are other items that many here will mention, so I'll defer to those, but I've often seen the focus on \"things\" that fit in a bag or pack, and less about the ethos of survival, and what it takes to make it from A to B to C, day after day. \n\nGood luck!", "949" ], [ "> marksmanship with a bow or a gun (if allowed legally where you are), the list goes on\n\nHunting small game with a portable, packable slingshot is also a useful skill, and many states that forbid bows or firearms, permit things like slingshots. \n\nObviously check your local laws and the laws of the counties and states you intend to travel through, but a hot meal of small game over a campfire can sometimes be the difference between lasting another week, or giving up.", "498" ], [ "> Is it like that in the states? Here in Canada, an arrest won’t show up on a background check unless you get charged with something serious.\n\nIn the states, public arrest is often public record, and you can search local town/state police blotters to see who was arrested and charged, and for what offenses. \n\nBackground checks depend on the agency conducting the check, and while they won't go into the grey areas (private investigators will, however), they can uncover things that would taint a successful hiring process if found (especially in the context of say, applying for a role in a nursing home or healthcare industry, where working directly with sick patients *requires* wearing a mask, full-time, while you're there.)", "260" ], [ "It’s amazing that it only took a global, viral, pandemic hoax coordinated across 149 countries and tens of thousands of hospitals and millions of healthcare workers, massive corruption by the USPS, nationwide election and voter fraud, thousands of reports of FAKE NEWS by the corrupt media and lies from lawyers, accountants and tax attorneys to bring <PERSON> down. /s", "19" ], [ "Every time one of these events happens, I wonder where we went so wrong with the Internet. \n\nDARPANET and later on, <PERSON> designed the Internet and WWW to survive simultaneous nuclear strikes, so important information, comms, would be routed around the devastated areas. \n\nInstead, we went the opposite direction, where a single site outage, brings down hundreds to thousands of other sites and links. \n\nEpic failure.", "199" ], [ "> had several alexa plugs that stopped working and couldn't figure out why i couldn't get the reconfigured.\n\nNot to worry! Soon, your neighbors will be able to be your failover site when your network goes down. No really, Amazon is going to opt you into sharing your IoT devices with your neighbors, so they can control your devices in case your network goes down. \n\n > *\"[Amazon Sidewalk](_URL_0_)\", when enabled, uses a small portion of your Internet bandwidth to provide these services to you and your neighbors. This setting will apply to all of your supported Echo and Ring devices that are linked to your Amazon account.\"*\n\nI'm not sure if they're sharing your WiFi password with your neighbors, or simply sharing your linked devices in your Amazon account with your neighbors, but both are terrifying options, and that they're opting everyone in by default, is very, *VERY* concerning.", "685" ], [ "> That’s not even remotely true\n\nStraight from their literature: \n\n > *\"When enabled, Sidewalk uses a small portion of your Internet bandwidth to provide these services to you and your neighbors. This setting will apply to all of your supported Echo and Ring devices that are linked to your Amazon account.\"*\n\n[...]\n\n > *\"Amazon Sidewalk creates a low-bandwidth network with the help of Sidewalk Bridge devices including select Echo and Ring devices. These Bridge devices share a small portion of your internet bandwidth which is pooled together to provide these services to you and your neighbors. And when more neighbors participate, the network becomes even stronger.\"*", "938" ], [ "> Amazon explicitly state you won’t even know when devices are attached.\n\nThe email we all received, specifically says that your Echo and Ring devices will be connected to neighbor's networks and vice-versa, \"so they can stay connected and continue to work over longer distances\". \n\nWhy I would want the Echo in my garage or Ring cameras inside my home to be connected to the neighbor's network, when they can't realistically *use* those devices when they're out of voice range, is still beyond me. \n\nThis is pretty hand-wavey, shady and will have security researchers crawling all over it. The potential for class action lawsuits is immense as well, especially with providers now clamping down with *STEEP* fines for overages and implementing caps. \n\nFor devices to be silently pinching off bandwidth, bandwidth you can't isolate, limit, or identify, is incredibly suspicious. \n\n > *\"Preserving customer privacy and security is foundational to how we’ve built Amazon Sidewalk. Information transferred over Sidewalk Bridges is encrypted and Bridge customers are not able to see that Sidewalk-enabled devices are connected to their Bridge. Customers who own Sidewalk-enabled devices will know they are connected to Sidewalk but will not be able to identify which Bridge they are connected to.\"*\n\nUnless they publicly identify the ports and protocols so these actions can be denied, QoS'd, throttled and limited, people are going to get pretty upset over time, as their neighbors on higher-bandwidth connections, start saturating lower-bandwidth neighbors with data that pushes them over their caps or causes additional charges for overages. \n\nIt's effectively a compulsory, opt-out (not opt-in), (purportedly) encrypted mesh network using your bandwidth and devices; you don't know what's being captured, transmitted, and many thousands of customers won't even realize they're participating in it. \n\nThis should be fun to watch unfold. popcorn.gif", "779" ], [ "Let's also not forget that <PERSON> is just a single person, but polarized millions of people in the US over the last 4 years who made visible their racism, their privilege, their illusion of power. \n\nEven if we successfully remove <PERSON> from the POTUS chair, our struggle is not done. <PERSON> shined a bright light on a dark stain on our country's health. \n\nWe still have millions of livid, racist, violent individuals who have to be identified, reasoned with and helped, through education, mental health treatment and any other means possible to keep our country peaceful, safe and cooperative.\n\nThis is going to be a multi-year struggle, not only to clean up the mess in the White House (and not just sterilizing every single surface against a deadly, viral pandemic), but also clean up the mess in our economy, our housing/rental market and the Americans who work hard every day to support this country, Red, Blue, Green, racist or otherwise. \n\nWe can't just breathe a sigh of relief when the final votes are counted, we have a long, long journey ahead.", "134" ], [ "> \tNo knock warrants are one of those things that would totally fine if the people who used them could be trusted to use them appropriately.\n\nIf there’s one thing the police have earned the reputation of, it’s that they can’t be trusted with *any* of the gear they have. Tasers, firearms, canines, zip cuffs, body cameras, batons, all of it. They even obscure their badges to avoid detection and prosecution. \n\nNo, they need to earn the right to carry and use that gear, through regular, repeated training and certification. \n\nAny misuse, you lose your taser/canine/firearm license until you recertify and pass a training course. \n\nTasering a subdued, handcuffed, disabled suspect 7 times in the back of your police cruiser should be a clear warning to other officers that you’re going to lose your job, pension, go bankrupt in a civil lawsuit and if you don’t end up in jail, land in a desk job or ejected. \n\nWhy we continue to tolerate these abuses, I just don’t know. The police are NOT above the law and if they’re not performing lawful duties, they should be replaced. Period.", "141" ], [ "> \tIt means that an average citizen must second guess if an intruder is legally or illegally breaking into their house which could lead to a hesitation that might get them killed by an actual criminal.\n\nThis presumes the police officers have a right to protect or defend the lives of people, innocent or guilty.\n\nThey do not. The Supreme Court struck down the “Serve and Protect” in 2005, around the same time the police rebranded themselves as “law enforcement”. \n\nThey do not have to protect you, me, the neighbors, the guilty or the innocent. They are supposed to defend the law, even unjust laws, even if it means they themselves break the law to enforce the law. \n\nPolice kill an average of 1,100 people each year, every year and have for the last 5-7 years. \n\nNot 100, not 200, not 500, but over 1,000 people a year die at the hands of the police in the United States, before they even reach a jail cell or trial. \n\nThat’s over 3/day, every day, including weekends and holidays, for years. Let that sink in. \n\nWe the People don’t matter, and haven’t for 15+ years.", "582" ], [ "> \t\"You must be Soft On Crime!\"\n\n“You must be soft on evidence”\n\nIf you need to bust down the door with 10 officers in the middle of the night to avoid a few ounces of drugs making their way down the toilet, you’ve failed at your jobs gathering evidence to prosecute. \n\nThe cost alone to the time, equipment, salaries, planning and execution is so far above and beyond the cost of the drugs themselves, I have to ask: What is the real point here? \n\nTo set an example? To intimidate? To silence the neighbors? To flex? To use the military toys to justify next year’s budgets? \n\nIt’s such a sad display of plastic power.", "314" ], [ "> \tEdit: the street should also be lit up with red and blue lights from their vehicles during the actual door kick.\n\nThis is a very important distinction. \n\nI live in an area with *very* tight neighbors with an active range and military base nearby. We light up each other’s yards, watch our driveways and cars, report suspicious activity to each other, cameras everywhere. \n\nIf one house is broken into, everyone gets rallied. If someone was in the midst of a loud house invasion with firearms going off, many neighbors would strap up and run towards the commotion to help. \n\nIf the police don’t make it clear they’re the ones breaking in and firing into the home, they might be surprised by friendly neighbors coming in after them holding them at gunpoint instead. \n\nSomeone in plainclothes yelling “I’m the police! POLICE!” would be laughed at. Everyone here knows who the police are, and strange faces without a badge, don’t get a pass.", "765" ], [ "> \tThe war on drugs has completely failed.\n\nIt was never meant to succeed, not in the way we’d interpret success anyway. \n\nThe point wasn’t to eliminate or even reduce the amount of drugs entering this country. The point was to identify the main sources and control the flow so the revenue went to the “right” people, not THE people. \n\nIt was always about controlling the drugs, not stopping them.", "615" ], [ "> \tSounds like everyone should go out and vote for change\n\nVoting is a play on stage. It’s for show. \n\nWhen the Supreme Court can just hand the Electoral College votes to a party with less Popular votes in any state they want (like they did to Florida in 2000 that handed <PERSON> that election), then what is the actual point of the vote?\n\nWe’ll all continue to vote, this election will likely be the biggest turnout since 1908, but with a 5-4, Right-leaning Supreme Court, with a new justice just appointed who publicly stated she would support the same decision that gave <PERSON> the 2000 election, do we really trust that change will happen, even if 65%+ of The People demand it?", "845" ], [ "> \tIf you rob a store, and a cop decides to shoot at you while you run away, and they miss and kill a bystander, you will be charged for the murder.\n\nConversely, in some states, if more than 1 person is involved in a home invasion and one of them is killed as the homeowner defends his property, if others run away to avoid being killed themselves, *they* are charged with the murder of their partner. There’s legal precedent here for it.", "528" ], [ "> what worries me is that if these people dont get some ventilator time theyre gonna walk out of quarantine tellin everybody its not so bad sadly since theyve rigged the game\n\nThere's no coming back from a ventilator without serious, life-altering consequences. \n\n1. Your trachea is irreparably damaged from having a vent tube in it for 16 days (average maximum, otherwise the tube starts to erode the trachea away, and you can't replace that organ)\n2. Your going to have *significantly* less lung function than you did before, because your alveoli have collapsed. They basically \"stick together\" and can never reinflate. This is why ventilator candidates have a high 'PEEP' value to keep the lungs from deflating enough to allow the alveoli to stick together. \n3. You're at significant risk of throwing clots, as your bloodstream develops \"fibroids\" which are not controlled by thinners. You're going to be at a much higher risk of strokes and circulatory failure (which leads to amputations of hands, feet, legs, arms). \n4. You're very likely to need full-time oxygen (think COPD tanks and mask 24x7) and may need a walker/wheelchair, because your circulation is damaged. \n\nAlso, less than 5% of people whose conditions are serious enough to merit being put on a ventilator, actually recover and walk out of the hospital. It's *extremely* rare. \n\n(Source: <PERSON> is an ICU nurse at one of the hospitals in the NYC metro'ish area, first-hand treating dozens of SARS-COV-2 patients per-day at the peak of the pandemic).", "421" ], [ "> <PERSON> will simply change the rules. Nothing is off the table any more.\n\nYou can't unilaterally change the rules without a vote, and the vote requires a majority to be present *to change the rules to permit remote voting*. It's literally a Catch-22. \n\nUntil there are a majority of senators recovered and present, able-bodied and willing to vote, you can't rescind the rule to prohibit remote voting. \n\nThis is exactly why senators are refusing to be tested, or refusing to admit they're positive with COVID-19, so they can force participation in the voting process, while putting thousands of others at mortal risk. \n\nThis is precisely the kind of thing that the rules were put into place to prevent.", "284" ], [ "> Eesh, that is awful. Nobody should be charged with murder unless they actually murdered someone, and if the murder was justified (such as in self-defense) there is no need for anyone to be charged.\n\n[Here](_URL_0_) is the case I was referring to. \n\nTwo important points here: \n\n1. The intruders claimed to be police in plainclothes. They were not. \n2. _\"Under Illinois’ felony murder law, homicide charges can be filed when someone is killed during the course of a crime even if the death was caused by someone else and the person charged with murder did not intend for the person to die.\"_\n\nThe burglar's accomplice is being charged with murder, because his partner was shot and killed during the home invasion, by the homeowner protecting his family.", "528" ], [ "> It's no surprise (but still shameful) that they let police officers off the hook when they murder citizens.\n\nDo you know how often this happens? Most people don't. \n\nThe statistics aren't widely known, because if they were, there would be hundreds of thousands to millions more protesting every day. \n\nWe focus on the few, but there are quite literally an average of over 1,000 people killed by police each year in the US, on the roadside or in their own homes, without an arrest, without a trial, without sentencing. \n\n* 2020: [720 people](_URL_0_) (so far)\n* 2019: [1004 people](_URL_2_)\n* 2018: [992 people](_URL_4_) \n* 2017: [1185 people](_URL_1_)\n* 2016: [1109 people](_URL_3_)\n* 2015: [1195 people](_URL_5_)\n\nLet's compare that with the number of officers killed in the line of duty from citizens (from the [FBI's own data](_URL_6_)) \n\n* 2019: 48 officers\n* 2015: 41 officers\n* 2010: 55 officers\n\nHow many more have to die, to prove the hundreds to thousands of dirty police officers are out there on the job, every day, breaking the very laws they're sworn to uphold?", "582" ], [ "> Why didn't they think the charges would stick? Lack of evidence? From the police? I'm shocked. Shocked I say.\n\nThe Grand Jury has one and only one question before them: \n\n_**\"Is there enough evidence presently gathered, to proceed to trial: Yes or No.\"**_\n\nThat's it. They don't weigh the evidence. They don't decide fates. They don't even have a chance to determine guilt or innocence. Literally, is there enough, or not? \n\nHere are the only two outcomes of a Grand Jury hearing: \n\n1. If there is enough evidence, the case proceeds to trial. \n2. If there is not enough evidence, the detectives go back, find and interview witnesses, interview police on the scene, work with CSI to gather forensic evidence and obtain more evidence, sufficient enough to proceed to trial. \n\nWhat you're witnessing in this specific case, is the complete gross misuse of the Grand Jury, skipping due process entirely, and going right to case dismissal, without actually doing their one and only job. \n\nNot only is this not how the Grand Jury works, it's right out in the open and people are not holding them accountable for this illegal misuse of their positions.", "12" ], [ "> It's called a search warrant. They're signed by judges.\n\nI'm sure you know this already, but search warrants do not grant the plainclothed police officers the right to bash down the door to execute the warrant, unannounced. That's not how warrants work. That's not how they're legally executed. \n\nThe officer's arguments for innocence are further dismantled when it became obvious they didn't do their due diligence to realize they: \n\n1. Executed the plainclothes, silent, no-knock warrant on the wrong address, and \n2. Their intended suspect was already in police custody\n\nThese officers frantically fired 32 rounds in response to 1 round fired by <PERSON> defending a home invasion against unannounced, plainclothes intruders in the middle of the night. \n\n16 of those 32 rounds were fired by a single officer, <PERSON>.", "260" ], [ "> If someone barges into your house in the middle of the night without announcing themselves wearing just a vest, would you really be inclined to believe that they're burglars or the police?\n\nThat's how many home invasions are starting to happen now, by plainclothes civilians announcing themselves as police, and breaking in, holding the family at gunpoint. \n\n[In at least one very recent case](_URL_0_), one of the burglars ran away while his partner was shot and killed by the homeowner defending his family, during a daytime home invasion, where the burglars claimed they were police.\n\nThat second burglar is being charged with his partner's murder, even though he didn't kill him, didn't have a firearm, and ran away from the scene before the homeowner shot and killed the intruder.", "695" ], [ "> It's not like they walked in there in a polo and khakis.\n\nNone of that matters. If you're a sleeping resident and you hear someone breaking down your door while you're still trying to wake up, are you going to wait until you can see the writing on their shirts, before you defend yourself? \n\nAre you going to check their wardrobe to make sure it's department-issued pants and shirt? \n\n**If you hesitate, you're dead**. Especially if the unannounced intruder is intent on harming or killing you in the process of invading your home. \n\nThe law protects homeowners who legally protect themselves and their families. It does not say they have to interview their intruders and assess intent before executing that protection. \n\nThe officers were clearly in the wrong, on so many separate items, but like many police officers who repeatedly break the law, they'll probably get a pass here too.", "141" ], [ "> know more about what happened than the grand jurors who have **every piece of evidence** in front of them.\n\n100% incorrect. \n\nThat is not the point of a Grand Jury. This was not a murder trial. It was ***Grand Jury***. They do not decide guilt nor innocence. They do not decide fate based on any evidence. They absolutely *do not* have every piece of evidence in front of them.\n\nThe Grand Jury literally has one question to answer: *Is there sufficient evidence already gathered, to bring this case to trial?*\n\nThat's it. Period. \n\nIf there's enough evidence, it moves to trial. If there is not sufficient evidence, the detectives do their job and interview witnesses, police, work with CSI and other departments to *gather* the missing evidence, to build a case that they will then take to trial. \n\nPlease read [this insightful comment](_URL_0_) for even more details on how our legal system in the US is corrupt, and getting worse, in support of police officers repeatedly breaking the law and killing innocent people (an average of 1,100 people each year for the last 5-6 years).", "12" ], [ "> The city had been trying to take the house with eminent domain before the investigation that led to the assassination I mean accidental shooting.\n\nMaybe that was the whole point from the beginning. \n\nIf they thought they could murder <PERSON>, triggering her known-armed boyfriend to shoot back, causing him to be thrown in jail, so the house would then be seized and sold at auction. \n\nMaybe then, the officers could use the proceeds to [purchase a margarita machine or a clown](_URL_0_).", "399" ], [ "> This means both sides will feel entitled that their choice should be president and riots will ensue.\n\nThe 5-4, Right-leaning Supreme Court will just give <PERSON> the Electoral votes, like they did to hand <PERSON> the election in 2000, when Florida demanded a manual recount. \n\n<PERSON> has already said she would back that Supreme Court's decision again in this election, if necessary.", "861" ], [ "> If <PERSON> loses, I think things will be relatively peaceful initially. I don't think the dust will settle on this for a few weeks. There might be some rioting/looting, but I don't think it will be extreme, widespread or sustained. \n\nHere's the thing... if there's an overwhelming landslide win for <PERSON> (one that isn't close enough to cry fraud or cheating), remember that <PERSON> is still Commander in Chief until <PERSON> is sworn in, in late January. \n\n<PERSON> could simply not call out the National Guard or the military to stop the riots. \n\nHe could just sit back, arms crossed like a 4-year old, and watch the country burn, and create a huge mess of destruction and violence that <PERSON> will spend the majority of his term trying to clean up.", "140" ], [ "> I suspect will try to gin up some way to stay in office, but to and including starting a war. And if he can't stay in office, he might strike a match and watch it all burn.\n\nIf <PERSON> is no longer POTUS, he loses the current shield of protection he's standing behind from the Justice Department. All of his lawsuits, likely including a RICO from NYC, will come down on him like a tonne of bricks. He does not get to go back to being a CEO with his feet up on the desk after this, and he knows it. \n\nHe's vulnerable, his empire will come crumbling down, and his foreign creditors will come calling in their loans; several billion dollars of loans. Billions of dollars that his now-public tax returns prove he does not have. \n\n<PERSON> is scared. Really scared. \n\nYou can see it on his face and in his tweets over the last few months. Those clips of him struggling to breathe after he left WR hospital show his fear. The wince of pain as he inhales and grips his side in that now-popular clip, shows that he's not the invincible God he portrays himself to be to his base. \n\nI have absolutely no doubt he'll do whatever it takes to burn the entire system down, so he can try to quietly slip out the back door unnoticed.", "140" ], [ "> That's probably far-fetched, especially since <PERSON> probably wouldn't have it and I can't' think of any other country both large enough to resist the US and willing to host <PERSON>. But, it's crossed my mind.\n\nThis is one of the biggest concerns why <PERSON> is considered a National Security risk by the FBI and CIA. \n\nA country like Russia or Turkey would welcome <PERSON> in, if the amount of inside data he has on our Government, bases, locations, military, movements, global operations, could be sold at top-dollar prices, to help pay off his growing debts to foreign countries.", "853" ], [ "> Any respiratory conditions that impede breathing.\n\nWhich, ironically, are treated in the hospital, by putting a mask on you that provides a clean flow of oxygen. \n\nThe \"asthma\" or \"allergies\" argument for not wearing a mask has been dismantled countless thousands of times by degreed medical professionals month after month after month. \n\nIt's funny to see that disinformation repeatedly coming out from these anti-maskers, time and time again.", "80" ], [ "> Are you saying everybody is going to have to change their password when he gets fired?\n\nHe's already (this week) signed [an Executive Order](_URL_0_) to **fire thousands of Federal workers** for \"disloyalty\" to <PERSON>. \n\nIt's almost like he really believes he's acting out a real-life version of \"The Apprentice\", firing 3 AGs, hiring 3 Supreme Court justices, firing hundreds of his staff. Now potentially thousands of federal workers. \n\nOr, he's taken a page out of the \"Dictator 101\" handbook on how to build a fascist regime. \n\nIt's a trainwreck in the WH.", "906" ] ]
495
[ 6390, 18327, 1703, 2128, 4620, 1331, 20981, 23512, 18151, 2080, 5369, 3565, 21545, 6612, 23596, 11753, 8805, 13002, 11071, 17666, 488, 16335, 14474, 23487, 6175, 17990, 7468, 14873, 19377, 4779, 12328, 12820, 13752, 6146, 4584, 8305, 11999, 3833, 15762, 16979, 16086, 8719, 12210, 11692, 24695, 22751, 16254, 23720, 22666, 21656, 21609, 11263, 12200, 24648, 19342, 3201, 15854, 2909, 13188, 8748, 21896, 18067, 16400, 12882, 15142, 7008, 17028, 17675, 24003, 11343, 15740, 14558, 2489, 18088, 18089, 10432, 11798, 18913, 837, 24200, 25052, 22180, 12920, 13416, 24901, 18723, 14723, 22115, 10299, 24394, 847, 8413, 16326, 12807, 19361, 18344, 9306, 5291, 16087, 5872, 14383, 20833, 25103, 8290, 25232, 19614, 8712, 13780, 4471, 11372, 16256, 22014, 11463, 11032, 9027, 3497, 15476, 2641, 17493, 10968, 16152, 8262, 22045, 5515, 1663, 5107, 20949, 5727, 17997, 7002, 21630, 8946, 14028, 13777, 15361, 3512, 10103, 24008, 24148, 10467, 3316, 23677, 18302, 24507, 5519, 6841, 4049, 811, 19411, 22178, 12478, 8856, 8590, 23497, 14095, 3549, 5378, 12937, 12361, 8405, 1587, 6344, 5355, 3009, 14851, 6148, 1868, 7211, 7466, 13333, 16349, 13882, 18658, 14700, 22696, 14408, 11197, 2951, 23036, 11322, 25522, 16814, 9329, 25474, 13092, 14649, 16949, 22578, 525, 25124, 25469, 24730, 20400, 10598, 25155, 20039, 10761, 24885, 3845, 2008, 17947, 19637, 6728, 22512, 20767, 5921, 16258, 6551, 21924, 19774, 14360, 17473, 16787, 12215, 330, 8836, 4450, 16872, 9351, 23188, 1965, 15423, 16461, 18272, 17859, 4632, 12420, 13594, 16806, 19587, 4395, 5073, 23759, 2700, 17959, 20461, 3417, 22886, 10357, 1103, 14417, 3753, 9507, 10402, 21136, 8162, 14150, 1430, 21484, 22911, 5498, 14235, 3217, 10041, 20565, 17050, 3413, 3730, 15258, 20451, 22798, 215, 982, 7899, 6465, 3121, 4764, 24354, 24407, 17559, 22469, 22830, 3499, 11756, 18280, 6632, 13701, 10671, 4794, 10612, 18360, 25222, 5922, 12977, 4614, 16187, 16249, 17547, 25434, 1499, 24327, 16134, 11864, 7502, 10346, 23903, 12751, 16748, 10940, 19779, 18611, 17235, 17507, 24782, 4162, 4783, 13375, 24122, 16770, 15628, 21112, 17236, 8325, 20574, 5549, 6178, 9331, 24128, 20115, 23597, 2788, 24844, 3773, 14278, 18063, 17229, 19823, 17364, 10525, 17771, 24126, 14367, 18864, 24165, 5329, 22558, 9024, 8740, 4853, 14520, 24565, 3684, 15848, 11496, 17420, 24424, 20345, 13122, 21496, 2416, 13629, 19175, 21469, 5962, 14229, 24025, 21706, 17193, 14214, 13468, 24022, 17639, 6933, 13342, 13876, 25042, 2013, 20840, 14672, 4557, 7701, 13635, 2895, 3767, 4217, 19714, 19131, 24880, 13285, 13515, 4222, 1692, 19580, 2774, 13463, 17840, 5371, 12749, 5090, 5146, 1175, 12876, 18093, 14294, 3071, 25289, 24538, 21948, 5979, 12486, 9779, 24683, 13265, 16220, 15971, 10806, 5235, 25126, 20531, 1478, 18476, 2129, 21132, 20272, 10975, 23707, 1476, 3430, 9092, 1086, 21639, 5219, 16430, 11896, 2860, 1013, 21464, 3743, 22668, 17944, 20442, 19982, 9645, 16584, 9180, 21784, 4599, 9553, 3120, 21400, 3159, 2294, 16862, 1884, 21404, 13658, 24982, 12196, 17421, 19745, 12010, 376, 18542, 14604, 11834, 24019, 8743, 4250, 7209, 12314, 11014, 1758, 23455, 17503, 8807, 1584, 15666, 17637, 8514, 2869, 5237, 1129, 24948, 16501, 11923, 9666, 13340, 436, 15267, 406, 21396, 8052, 23803, 14024, 18644, 414, 25235, 15402, 18121, 23826, 24113, 17545, 8256, 18761, 4804, 18842, 3765, 13889, 4405 ]
reddit_dump_00000000000001000000
[ [ "We have and will continue to have a \"lesser of two evils\" mentality as long as we have a two-party system ([which we will have as long as we use first-post-the-post voting](_URL_0_)). And when faced with two evils, choosing the lesser is the **rational** choice. Refraining from participating increases the probability of the greater of the two evils winning, relative to voting for the lesser.\n\n > Fervent idealism, which places support for a certain candidate above all practical consequences of that support, is foolhardy. According to ethicists, it’s also immoral.\n\n > “The purpose of voting is not to express your fidelity to a worldview. It’s not to wave a flag or paint your face in team colors; it’s to produce outcomes,” says <PERSON>, a philosopher at Georgetown University and author of *The Ethics of Voting*. “If they’re smart, they’ll vote for the candidate likely to best produce the outcome they want. That might very well be compromising, but if voting for a far-left or far-right candidate means that you’re just going to lose the election, then you’ve brought the world further away from justice rather than closer to it.”^[1]\n\nWhat do you think of that?\n\n***\n\n1. *Quartz*: [\"Ethicists say voting with your heart, without a care about the consequences, is actually immoral.\"](_URL_1_) June 26, 2016.", "845" ], [ "> I'd like to see an example of just one \"Clean Water\" or \"Clean Emission\" regulation he rolled back.\n\nThe count is past 60.^[1]\n\n > The trade war has been going on for decades. We lost. He's just bringing us back to the table.\n\nCould you provide some sources for those claims? I'm skeptical because it appears that <PERSON>'s own White House Council of Economic Advisers is internally indicating that the trade war is a bad idea.^[2] Also many economists dislike it.^[3]\n\n > His <PERSON> propaganda attacks?\n\n > > We're talking rationality here. What's an example?\n\nIt's hard to call it \"lying\" because we can't peek inside his brain and confirm his motivation, but surely you acknowledge that he routinely spreads false information that coincidentally fits his narratives.^[4] Even if that's not technically lying, I hope that we can agree that it's an atrocious trait to have in a chief executive.\n\n***\n\n1. *The New York Times*: [\"67 environmental rules on\nthe way out under <PERSON>.\"](_URL_3_) January 31, 2018.\n\n2. *The New York Times*: [\"White House analysis finds tariffs will hurt growth, as officials insist otherwise.\"](_URL_0_) June 7, 2018.\n\n3. *CBS*: [\"Trade war drums raise risk of recession in next year or two, economists say.\"](_URL_2_) June 4, 2018.\n\n4. *The Washington Post*: [\"The 2016 Election Fact Checker.\"](_URL_1_) November 3, 2016.", "771" ], [ "> Which action promotes dirty water and dirty air? Which regulatory rollback, specifically, will make our water and air dirtier?\n\nPer my source, he overturned:\n\n* Ban on use of lead ammunition on federal lands\n\n* Anti-dumping rule for coal companies\n\nand rollbacks are in progress for:\n\n* Permitting process for air-polluting plants\n\n* Coal ash discharge regulations\n\nHow can you see the policies listed in that article and then ask, \"Which regulatory rollback, specifically, will make our water and air dirtier?\" Why don't you think that those will make our water and air dirtier?\n\n > Canada: 245 percent for cheese, 298 percent for butter for example. Then there are plenty of non-monetary trade barriers. _URL_0_\n\nI see your point. But do <PERSON>'s tariffs move us closer to or farther away from free trade? What leads you to believe that they will accomplish what you want them to? Could you point to historical evidence or expert opinion? And is your goal worth hurting our economy? (See the sources in my previous comment for his trade war being bad for the economy.)\n\n > This is his use of \"over exaggeration\" tactics, also clearly outlined in his book.\n\nIt seems like you're saying that he's knowingly making false statements (i.e. lying) but implying that it's okay because it gets people talking about what he wants them to talk about.", "771" ], [ "Why clog up chat when you can simply wait a few minutes, or just watch 820 again in a few hours. It's selfishly putting your needs over the usability of a public resource.\n\nWatching for someone to say \"I found trial X\" is plenty good enough. People aren't entitled to speeding the process up at the cost of turning 820 into a useless cesspool of LF messages.", "882" ], [ "> Hey kiddo.\n\nWhy are you responding to being called out for antisocial behavior by being condescending?\n\nAnyways. I wasn't saying that you *can't* do it, so announcing that you can do it is off-topic. I was saying that you *shouldn't* do it, for reasons which I outlined above but am more than happy to repeat. It's:\n\n1. not especially useful, because you're asking for a random encounter\n\n2. not especially necessary, because people post them frequently anyways\n\n3. useless spam from the perspective of many other people in chat", "480" ], [ "First things first, I want to say thanks for this discussion! It's refreshing to find someone else who is so willing to having a dialog.\n\n > This \"ban\" was issued without consultation of any local stakeholders\n\nSource?\n\n > resulted in the closings of thousands of trails, preserves and lands run by the Fish & Wildlife Services due to inability to enforce\n\nSource?\n\n > it wound up forcing the closing of many recreational fishing areas\n\nSource?\n\nYou made three unsourced claims in your first two sentences. I'd really, *really* like to know where you're getting them. Where did you find those?\n\nAlso, could you respond to my other questions/remarks in that comment? You skipped them. I've copied them below for your convenience:\n\n > > Canada: 245 percent for cheese, 298 percent for butter for example. Then there are plenty of non-monetary trade barriers. _URL_0_\n\n > I see your point. But do <PERSON>'s tariffs move us closer to or farther away from free trade? What leads you to believe that they will accomplish what you want them to? Could you point to historical evidence or expert opinion? And is your goal worth hurting our economy? (See the sources in my previous comment for his trade war being bad for the economy.)\n\n > > This is his use of \"over exaggeration\" tactics, also clearly outlined in his book.\n\n > It seems like you're saying that he's knowingly making false statements (i.e. lying) but implying that it's okay because it gets people talking about what he wants them to talk about.", "866" ], [ "> Then the Angles and Saxons came, they didn’t replace the Celts either, ruled them and integrated and brought their language and customs, but didn’t replace them. Same with the Vikings and the Normans. The indigenous population got merged with the invaders but was never replaced. As an English person you share a high degree of genetic similarity to the Celtic world.\n\nSource?", "842" ], [ "Yeah, 50 years ago. Now it's a different story.\n\n > While there is room for improvement in every country, the U.S. stands out for having the highest costs and lowest performance — the U.S. spent $8,508 per person on health care in 2011, compared with $3,406 in the United Kingdom, which ranked first overall.^[1]\n\nWere you aware of that?\n\n***\n\n1. *The Commonwealth Fund*: [\"US health system ranks last among eleven countries on measures of access, equity, quality, efficiency, and healthy lives.\"](_URL_0_) June 16, 2014.", "661" ], [ "Would you be comfortable with someone taking advantage of you and then justifying it by saying that they were trying to teach you a lesson?\n\nIf he really *just* wanted to teach a lesson, shouldn't he give it back afterward? Or is it important that he lose the currency permanently? Seems suspiciously convenient, doesn't it?\n\nWho are you to determine that he *must* be taught that lesson? Who are you to announce that you know his best interests better than he does and so rationalize scamming him as actually doing him a favor?\n\nPerhaps he would be better off with that lesson. Probably, even. But it's not a stranger's place to make that determination, and certainly not if he's gaining something in the transaction. He's not impartial.", "925" ], [ "Who are you to make the decision for him that he has to learn that lesson? Especially when you're profiting from that decision, can you really pretend to be acting in his best interest?\n\n**What bothers me is this rationalization of scamming for profit by saying that *really* what's happening is you're helping some poor fellow out.** Come on. That's not why people are doing it. You want to separate a sucker from his money, and you're trying to find ways to justify that. At least have the balls to own your antisocial tendencies.", "219" ], [ "> If someone decides to buy a shitty item for an unreasonable price, thats on them.\n\nNot entirely. You can't overlook the role that OP played. If he takes actions that intentionally try to increase the likelihood of someone else screwing himself over, and then the other person screws himself over, OP can't throw his hands in the air and say, \"Hey, that's not on me.\" **OP knowingly facilitated the other person's mistake.**\n\nOP is the one trying to take advantage of someone by listing something for the price of a similar but much more expensive item. It's not then the buyer's fault for falling victim to an active attempt at deception.", "618" ], [ "> I just wouldn't believe you didn't act on anything, at all, to include CP.\n\nAre you saying that your fundamental answer to \"How would you feel about a friend who suddenly tells you he/she is a non-practicing paedophile?\" is \"I wouldn't believe that he/she is actually non-practicing\"?\n\n > The fantasies in your head--even though never acted upon--are nonconsensual.\n\nDo people need to consent to being fantasized about? Does a teenaged girl need consent from <PERSON> or <PERSON>?", "442" ], [ "Because he doesn't have control over his sexual orientation, only his actions? And the human, compassionate, empathetic response to someone struggling with something he was born with, assuming he hasn't acted on it, isn't to \"beat the fuck out of him\"?\n\nAlso, what the fuck would beating him up accomplish? He already said he isn't practicing and presumably thinks it's wrong. He doesn't need to be \"convinced\". All you're doing is hurting someone who 1) is in a terrible situation through no fault of his own and 2) hasn't hurt anyone.\n\nHave you considered any of that?", "219" ], [ "> Being a veteran doesn't give you more of a stake than anyone else. People of different backgrounds sacrifice different things, for different reasons, in different jobs, in different cities and towns, in different ways. Military members made a choice to serve, just as a fast food employee chose to work at McDonald's\n\nJust want to make sure I have this right: Are you comparing the sacrifices of veterans to the sacrifices of McDonald's employees?", "920" ], [ "> Researchers at the Medical University of Vienna, led by senior authors Dr. <PERSON> and Dr. <PERSON>, show that administration of the male hormone testosterone in female-to-male transsexuals raises brain levels of SERT, the protein that transports the chemical messenger serotonin into nerve cells.\n\n > In contrast, male-to-female transsexuals who received a testosterone blocker and the female hormone estrogen showed decreased levels of this protein in the brain.\n\n > SERT plays an important role in the treatment of mood and anxiety disorders, as many common antidepressants, such as Prozac, block its activity by inhibiting serotonin reuptake. In addition, some genetics studies have suggested that higher levels of serotonin transporter may increase resilience to stress and reduce risk for stress and mood disorders.^[1]\n\n***\n\n1. <PERSON>, <PERSON> et al. [\"High-Dose Testosterone Treatment Increases Serotonin Transporter Binding in Transgender People.\"](_URL_0_) *Society of Biological Psychiatry* 78, No. 8: 525-33. October 15, 2015.", "398" ], [ "> So it's actually much easier to make currency in HC as a casual\n\nAren't casuals notoriously bad at price-checking items and identifying good rares to sell? Are they selling much? Don't you have to know a decent amount about a lot of different builds in order to know what people might find useful?\n\n > In SC once the league is a couple weeks old a pretty large gap gets created where just ok rares are dirt cheap and really good ones are super expensive.\n\n1. The prices of ok rares affect way more people than the prices of really good ones\n\n2. Really good ones are super expensive, but still less expensive than in HC. For example, compare steel rings, 400+ pdps 1h swords and axes, and INT armour helms", "532" ], [ "> meaning as a casual player you cant sell items for nearly as much as on hardcore\n\nAren't casuals notoriously bad at price-checking items and identifying good rares to sell? Are they selling much? Don't you have to know a decent amount about a lot of different builds in order to know what people might find useful?\n\n > decent items are way more expensive on softcore because of the exalt price\n\nWhat do you define as \"decent items\"? The things that I'm looking at (Kaom's Heart, Kaom's Way, Belly of the Beast, Brass Dome, Starforge, Disfavour, statsticks, steel rings, Shavronne's Wrappings, 400pdps 1hand swords and axes) are all much cheaper in SC.", "532" ], [ "> SC items are cheap for mediocre items\n\nAnd as a casual player who would never make enough for the super expensive items anyways, that's fine with me!\n\n > you’ll make more selling drops to make up for it\n\nAren't casuals notoriously bad at price-checking items and identifying good rares to sell? Are they selling much? Don't you have to know a decent amount about a lot of different builds in order to know what people might find useful?\n\n > At the same time the true endgame items are a bit cheaper since there’s less inflation.\n\nI'm not sure what you define to be \"true endgame items\" but the things that I'm looking at (Kaom's Heart, Kaom's Way, Belly of the Beast, Brass Dome, Starforge, Disfavour, statsticks, steel rings, Shavronne's Wrappings, 400pdps 1hand swords and axes, ...) are all much cheaper in SC.", "532" ], [ "Is this a joke?\n\nTheir discretion and diligence ensures that they 1) don't publish incorrect stories and 2) don't compromise ongoing investigations, both of which are important for protecting their reputation and therefore their continued ability to conduct journalism at a high level.\n\nAnd your response to their professionalism is to reject it and turn to \"open source reporting from random twitter accounts\"? And you're *presenting this as a good idea*?", "624" ], [ "And <PERSON> and <PERSON> race in HC a lot, so you'd expect them to be good racers in HC...\n\nWhat's your point? Being really good due to extensive practice doesn't change the fact that they're really good. It doesn't make sense to diminish someone's ability by saying, \"Well, they had to spend a lot of time to reach that level.\" That's how everyone gets good.", "77" ], [ "> Owning a gun in itself doesn't make you want to kill people, that's mental illness that goes untreated.\n\nWhy do you say that?\n\n > Our group at Duke recently published a study of approximately 82,000 people diagnosed with serious mental illnesses in Florida between 2002 and 2011. We found that those with serious mental health disorders with records in the public behavioral health system were no more likely than the general adult population in Florida to use a gun to harm others (about 213 vs. 217 gun crimes per 100,000 people per year), and they were only slightly more likely to die in a gun-related suicide (about 13 vs. 9 gun suicides per 100,000 people per year). **Thus, people with mental illnesses are no more dangerous to others when they have equal access to guns.**^[1]\n\n***\n\n1. *The Washington Post*: [\"The ban on mentally ill people buying guns wasn't ever based on evidence.\"](_URL_0_) February 10, 2017.", "701" ], [ "> There are 33 genders and doctors are bigots\n\nThe medical community agrees that there are many different genders. Gender isn't the same thing as sex.\n\n > Stand on the graves of dead kids to push our agenda!\n\nAnd the right stands on the graves of people killed by immigrants to push their agenda. \"Politicization\" is just how societies enact large-scale change based on real-life events.", "68" ], [ "That's a fair point. The answer is that there's a socially determined range of what might be reasonably considered to be emotionally harmful. Finding physical sexual harassment emotionally harmful would be reasonable. Finding a bad pun emotionally harmful would be unreasonable.\n\n**It's an informal application of the legal fiction called the [reasonable person standard](_URL_0_).** Someone going to court and claiming they were wronged via a butt grab would make sense (that'd almost definitely be deemed sexual harassment) whereas going to court for a bad pun wouldn't.\n\nDoes that seem fair to you?", "219" ], [ "Allow me to give you five. In the U.S., we've needed to be protected from corporations via means such as:\n\n* laws enforcing the 8 hour standard workday (instead of 12)\n\n* child labor laws\n\n* laws preventing companies from dumping industrial waste in residential communities\n\n* laws enforcing ethics practices for pharmaceutical trials\n\n* laws mandating safety protocols for miners\n\nDo those not constitute \"protection from corporations\"? If not, why? Are the phenomena that I described (child labor, dumping toxic waste near houses, unsafe mining practices, etc.) not bad? If we agree that they are bad: Are corporations not the ones primarily responsible for them?", "23" ], [ "I think the point was to push back against the narrative that Europeans were somehow uniquely inhumane in their treatment of other people by noting that other cultures were also genocidal. Peoples from every region carried out destructive acts to their fullest capacity; Europeans were unusual simply in that their technological advancement made them better able to destroy.\n\nJust because a point doesn't completely rebut what's being said doesn't make it irrelevant. Adding context is also useful.", "267" ], [ "You didn't say it made it easier, you said it was convenience. Convenience implies that people would be able to clear content without it but this simply makes it, well, more convenient to do what they already can. Easier might mean making something easier to the point at which someone can be accomplished in the first place, which is what I'm talking about. Some of my builds, as I play them, need curses to clear trash mobs in T13+ maps.\n\nDon't assume that just because something is merely a convenience for you means that it's merely a convenience for others.", "360" ], [ "> it's not the government's place to tell business how to run their operations\n\nWithout government intervention, ISPs are free to extort tolls from content providers and block those that don't comply. **Verizon has literally admitted in court (during oral arguments for Verizon v. FCC 2014) that they're interested in blocking websites that don't pay fees**:\n\n > In court last week, the judges asked whether the company intended to favor certain websites over others.\n\n > “I’m authorized to state from my client today,” Verizon attorney <PERSON> said, “that but for these rules we would be exploring those types of arrangements.”\n\n > <PERSON>’s admission might have gone unnoticed had she not repeated it at least five times during oral arguments.\n\n > In response to Judge <PERSON>’s line of questioning about whether Verizon should be able to block any website or service that doesn’t pay the company’s proposed tolls, <PERSON> said: “I think we should be able to; in the world I'm positing, you would be able to.” ([source](_URL_0_))\n\nAre we in agreement that that would be a bad thing?\n\n > > But the truth is that most Americans have no more than one, maybe two, choices when it comes to high-speed internet.\n\n > THIS IS THE REAL PROBLEM.\n\nLet's assume we break down the monopolies/duopolies. What if each of the 3-4 ISPs in an area tries to block content providers that don't pay tolls? Would that not be an issue? Or do you have some guarantee that this wouldn't happen?", "717" ], [ "> The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent agency of the United States government created by statute (47 U.S.C. § 151 and 47 U.S.C. § 154) to regulate interstate communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable. The FCC works towards six goals in the areas of broadband, competition, the spectrum, the media, public safety and homeland security, and modernizing itself. ([Wikipedia](_URL_0_))\n\nIt sounds like they have a lot of business regulating the internet.", "717" ], [ "> You realize that Verizon won that case right?\n\nYes. The ruling was that Congress hadn't given them the power to prevent blocking yet. I'm saying that Congress should give them that power. What was your point?\n\n > as juvenile as that sounds\n\nDid you mean to be condescending?\n\n > the government has a very poor track record at attempting to regulate/legislate the internet.\n\nI disagree. But let's assume that you're right. Why then is the conclusion that we should stop trying entirely? Are we supposed to give up on regulating ISPs entirely?\n\n > With regards to your toll metaphor, ISPs who run their own networks should be able to charge whatever toll they want.\n\n[Tech experts](_URL_0_) and consumer advocates disagree with you. The ISPs themselves agree with you. I know which side I'm on.", "717" ], [ "> I don’t think ending net neutrality will destroy or hobble the internet. In fact. If the current leading ISPs were to start and attempt tiered internet I’d like to think it would spurn the growth and development of competition.\n\nTech start-ups think that they know:\n\n > After <PERSON>’s announcement, a group of more than 800 names in tech sent <PERSON> a business-minded denouncement of his plans to strip away the rules that shape net neutrality.\n\n > > Without net neutrality, the incumbents who provide access to the Internet would be able to pick winners or losers in the market. They could impede traffic from our services in order to favor their own services or established competitors. Or they could impose new tolls on us, inhibiting consumer choice. Those actions directly impede an entrepreneur’s ability to “start a business, immediately reach a worldwide customer base, and disrupt an entire industry.” ([source](_URL_0_))\n\nHaving read that, are you still unsure of the impact that tiered internet might have on competition?", "717" ], [ "> They behave the same way, only in an apartment.\n\nMany of them don't:\n\n > Homeless services once worked like a reward system. Kick an addiction, get a home. Take some medication, get counseling. But <PERSON>’s model, called “housing first,” said the order was backward. Someone has the best chance of improving if they’re stabilized in a home.\n\n > ...\n\n > Several years later, the federal government tested the model on 734 homeless across 11 cities, finding the model dramatically reduced levels of addiction as well as shrank health related costs by half. “Adults who have experienced chronic homelessness may be successfully housed and can maintain their housing,” the report declared.^[1]\n\n***\n\n1. *The Washington Post*: [\"Meet the outsider who accidentally solved chronic homelessness.\"](_URL_0_) May 6, 2015.", "681" ], [ "> that the response being an accusation that the accusation is disrespectful is to admit to the grievous deeds\n\nI don't think saying, \"Your accusation was leveled in a disrespectful manner\" is equivalent to saying, \"I admit to doing what you have accused me of\".\n\nI mean, it would if the accusation of disrespectful location/timing was itself an instance of systemic oppression of people of color, but I have a suspicion that if a white player kneeled during the anthem to draw attention to, say, the plight of the homeless or the mentally ill, it would also be viewed as disrespectful.", "389" ], [ "> I’m sorry you think I’m condescending\n\nYour \"I understand to someone as young and inexperienced you are (based on your typing skills)\" comment was absolutely condescending. You directly called him inexperienced while correcting him.\n\nFYI, \"I'm sorry you think I did X...\" is a pretty bad apology template. Instead of saying that your actions were wrong, you're saying that the other person's interpretation of your actions was wrong.", "730" ], [ "What exactly constitutes the American empire?\n\nI'd argue we're interventionist. But with a few small exceptions we don't govern territory that isn't ours, so we're not strictly speaking an empire. There is a single American people, subdivided though we may be. We don't need to worry about revolts by self-contained ethnic groups living on land that we annexed. I understand that we're similar to an empire in that we have a large sphere of influence, but that's more fundamentally just a feature of states that are much stronger than others, empire or not.\n\nAlso worth noting is that a feature that almost completely overlaps with that list is dynasticism/monarchism. I'm definitely not an expert and only gave the list a brief skim, but from what I can tell the United States appears to be the only polity on the list that 1) doesn't include large units of foreign land/people and 2) is a democracy. (The Poland-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Roman Republic were both democracies but had substantial foreign holdings.) For those reasons I think it's reasonable to consider the United States only figuratively an empire, and so an exception to the rule.", "593" ], [ "> a tyranny of the majority\n\nIf simple majority rule constitutes \"tyranny of the majority\" then minority rule is \"tyranny of the minority\". It's even less defensible. It's like the old <PERSON> quote about how democracy is the worst system of government imaginable - except for all the other ones. Majority rule is potentially abusable, but the alternative of minority rule is much less stable.\n\nAlso, if your argument is that the minority faces an existential threat if it's not in power, then the only ethical conclusion there is that \"the minority *should* be in power.\" In which case, well, just drop the pretense of democracy entirely. You're actively advocating for minority rule.\n\nYou're saying, \"We can't let both sides have social and legal power because we'll be taken advantage of, so how about you get the undeniable social power that comes from being the majority, and we get the legal power.\" How sustainable is that?\n\nAnyways, many governments have checks in place to prevent a tyranny of the majority. Not all administration is conducted through elected representatives. That's why we have the Supreme Court in the US, for example.\n\n > frothing at the mouth about how \"every vote must carry equal weight\"\n\n[\"One man, one vote\"](_URL_0_) is the core mechanic behind [proportional representation](_URL_1_), which is literally the most fundamental democratic principle. \"Frothing at the mouth\" about democracy seems reasonable enough to me.", "593" ], [ "I had some issues with the article:\n\n > Democrats are nearly as complicit in this as Republicans. Instead of joining their GOP counterparts in suckling at the greasy teats of telcom, they’ve sold out the American people for votes. Rather than fight with everything they have, they’ve watched as net neutrality was destroyed.\n\nWhat exactly were Democrats supposed to do? <PERSON> appointed the Republican majority on the FCC board, and Democrats in Congress can't overturn the board's policies because of the Republican majority in the House. Once the election was concluded, so was net neutrality.", "468" ], [ "> this was the best thing that could have happened for the future of technology\n\nNot according to tech start-ups:\n\n > After <PERSON>’s announcement, a group of more than 800 names in tech sent <PERSON> a business-minded denouncement of his plans to strip away the rules that shape net neutrality.^[1]\n\nThe only group fighting against net neutrality is ISPs.\n\n***\n\n1. *TechCrunch*: [\"More than 800 startups ask FCC chair to not kill net neutrality.\"](_URL_0_) April 26, 2017.", "717" ], [ "> wouldn't it be fair to say they had plenty of chances in the past to ensure net neutrality couldn't be destroyed so easily?\n\nSince 2000, there has only been a Democratic president + Democratic congress in 2009-2010. Only two years. They pushed through as much as they could during that narrow window, and they couldn't fit this in. So no, I don't think it would be fair to say that they had \"plenty of chances\" to keep this from becoming a problem.\n\nAnyway, I was more broadly taking issue with the false equivalence. If Republicans are the ones trying to destroy net neutrality, and Democrats are the ones trying to save it, how are they both similarly responsible for net neutrality breaking down? Clearly the Republicans are responsible.", "468" ], [ "> We should address those things you mention: subsidies, false advertising, monopolies. Net neutrality policy addresses none of those things. I'm 100% on board on finding a solution for those problems\n\nHe also mentioned something else:\n\n > Limiting small business growth is going to be the biggest long term effect of this, essentially making small businesses pay a lot more for service that would not cost them nearly as much before.\n\nDo you not have a problem with ISPs blocking/slowing content providers that don't pay fees? What about the potential for unethical behavior like slowing competitors' websites? Does it not worry you that the internet would no longer be a level playing field?", "717" ], [ "That's fine, everyone makes mistakes.\n\nNo, the majority wasn't for the full term. Democrats only had a majority in Congress for the first half of his first term. It was the 111th U.S. Congress, if you're curious. And they really did try very hard:\n\n > This Congress has been considered one of the most productive Congresses in history in terms of legislation passed since the 89th Congress, during <PERSON> Great Society. ([Wikipedia](_URL_0_))", "826" ], [ "**Verizon has literally admitted in court (during oral arguments for Verizon v. FCC 2014) that they're interested in blocking websites that don't pay fees**:\n\n > In court last week, the judges asked whether the company intended to favor certain websites over others.\n\n > “I’m authorized to state from my client today,” Verizon attorney <PERSON> said, “that but for these rules we would be exploring those types of arrangements.”\n\n > <PERSON>’s admission might have gone unnoticed had she not repeated it at least five times during oral arguments.\n\n > In response to Judge <PERSON>’s line of questioning about whether Verizon should be able to block any website or service that doesn’t pay the company’s proposed tolls, <PERSON> said: “I think we should be able to; in the world I'm positing, you would be able to.” ([source](_URL_0_))\n\nWere you aware of that?", "717" ], [ "> Was Net neutrality warranted?\n\nYes. Were you aware that **Verizon has literally admitted in court (during oral arguments for Verizon v. FCC 2014) that they're interested in blocking websites that don't pay tolls?**\n\n > In court last week, the judges asked whether the company intended to favor certain websites over others.\n\n > “I’m authorized to state from my client today,” Verizon attorney <PERSON> said, “that but for these rules we would be exploring those types of arrangements.”\n\n > <PERSON>’s admission might have gone unnoticed had she not repeated it at least five times during oral arguments.\n\n > In response to Judge <PERSON>’s line of questioning about whether Verizon should be able to block any website or service that doesn’t pay the company’s proposed tolls, <PERSON> said: “I think we should be able to; in the world I'm positing, you would be able to.” ([source](_URL_0_))", "717" ], [ "> Saying, \"I think we should be able to\"\n\nThey said more than that. Look at the second paragraph of my quote. She said \"but for these rules [i.e. the Open Internet Order, which is what the case was about] we would be exploring those types of arrangements.\" How could that be any clearer?\n\nSeriously, please, I'm genuinely trying to reach across the aisle and understand our communication disconnect. It seems very obvious to me that she explicitly stated that Verizon was actively interested in those policies.\n\nAlso, why would someone *go to court* to say \"I think we should be able to do this\" if they didn't want to do it?\n\nEdit: Also, what kind of argument is \"It never happened, and won't happen in the future\"? Even if we ignore the excerpt that I provided above in which they literally said they were interested in it, how do you know that it won't happen? And even if it won't happen, then there's still no harm in outlawing it, right? What is the downside of making it illegal for ISPs to block content providers that don't pay their tolls?", "717" ], [ "> Whichever side feels and reacts positively with empathy is the right side.\n\nBut what happens when each side defines \"feeling and reacting positively with empathy\" differently?\n\nNot a conservative or pro-lifer, but the abortion issue is a good example of this. Democrats view ourselves as being empathetic to the mother. Republicans view themselves as being empathetic to a fetus, which they see as a future citizen and having been already given life. They consider it to be alive, and so act empathetically toward it. You can call it unreasonable all you want, but it doesn't make sense to deny that it's empathetic in its own way.", "674" ] ]
14
[ 21213, 22392, 21890, 7051, 768, 11571, 1079, 5699, 25431, 14786, 17300, 20063, 13983, 18843, 17498, 14020, 1560, 11707, 5962, 4699, 92, 20899, 13573, 12601, 11065, 25474, 11548, 6459, 3697, 18974, 12410, 9139, 22626, 19175, 22103, 21751, 1103, 21147, 12984, 11103, 9439, 20609, 8713, 23270, 19248, 143, 7197, 7149, 4411, 22213, 16258, 3271, 8221, 21124, 20436, 16378, 25404, 15511, 16037, 17547, 7278, 21459, 24983, 1273, 6543, 18390, 24206, 14701, 23164, 14524, 7662, 4027, 18765, 2849, 9669, 18654, 8909, 19004, 8384, 23570, 22422, 18272, 9004, 11748, 20190, 21719, 19220, 16976, 22679, 25533, 4268, 14214, 4278, 18033, 10416, 1117, 10402, 6731, 17455, 19725, 20033, 18562, 5532, 23486, 21070, 9904, 1102, 22757, 18447, 17227, 16192, 24424, 19639, 2675, 18044, 1909, 15992, 14967, 4499, 12640, 16887, 15496, 4940, 4378, 21293, 5544, 12543, 20339, 6162, 13708, 8993, 15711, 17053, 20038, 25317, 10782, 21354, 3279, 19401, 24113, 19526, 12748, 18841, 13906, 21493, 12926, 8974, 4692, 16294, 9726, 15500, 15441, 9264, 6361, 24354, 20043, 18082, 6666, 5653, 4939, 21120, 20073, 2107, 23694, 24942, 18113, 4555, 5782, 5966, 11580, 19677, 16628, 21660, 25235, 22424, 4953, 6082, 11038, 11984, 10851, 11863, 17004, 21741, 20013, 1540, 12783, 15015, 17739, 4474, 10038, 21219, 22749, 17840, 15076, 1478, 3428, 16892, 13913, 21680, 10724, 8558, 9828, 24507, 25442, 7963, 7104, 15105, 15475, 24982, 19656, 16574, 1781, 530, 475, 1953, 12939, 2917, 7030, 13380, 18624, 6420, 14870, 23093, 24146, 15420, 19654, 7212, 11522, 24003, 999, 23826, 4450, 16483, 10959, 21044, 6510, 9663, 5988, 10350, 22315, 8395, 13094, 13398, 18576, 18638, 18881, 12442, 7062, 628, 24303, 13977, 18543, 22668, 8118, 2092, 10014, 8544, 15979, 16548, 2702, 2521, 12585, 22161, 14938, 2080, 19614, 18400, 16675, 23764, 12920, 14401, 17821, 13061, 346, 15411, 3001, 19024, 7033, 3721, 661, 12051, 15909, 181, 19259, 3330, 5073, 9191, 13723, 5572, 13200, 11831, 7568, 23143, 11994, 9104, 25515, 14911, 21476, 8232, 686, 3811, 7136, 1229, 4538, 17154, 3053, 17829, 4055, 4283, 1616, 22828, 24819, 1731, 6850, 7247, 525, 11336, 18611, 14361, 9626, 19894, 24338, 24462, 9507, 12413, 15968, 11398, 12837, 4887, 4464, 21742, 18690, 19543, 8630, 24308, 4779, 17950, 10027, 6989, 20364, 6773, 12650, 8234, 8788, 1278, 16500, 12893, 18501, 16329, 4249, 5238, 12897, 11409, 14956, 13896, 12751, 18247, 3224, 22964, 1202, 17030, 739, 18859, 19186, 6103, 9699, 13805, 20072, 22193, 8426, 4199, 14294, 5052, 10237, 10850, 23571, 4483, 9654, 18785, 23042, 11177, 4248, 22347, 20530, 9514, 18697, 12636, 8829, 11822, 993, 1406, 2960, 16189, 22419, 12361, 6262, 9933, 20574, 21246, 20237, 19631, 1218, 1300, 2545, 9449, 408, 5360, 24593, 20286, 3793, 23211, 8249, 5371, 6398, 23171, 5847, 2420, 16139, 14901, 1374, 18818, 8742, 8773, 10063, 14604, 132, 18807, 23642, 2225, 19955, 8712, 22506, 20784, 19444, 8478, 10163, 18720, 13058, 11999, 15133, 4277, 9367, 8273, 20262, 21534, 20437, 7556, 1756, 19109, 19683, 21218, 17444, 13600, 15807, 18554, 822, 8220, 21322, 21922, 23124, 21168, 19850, 18618, 10708, 10897, 12461, 6002, 22115, 14904, 5399, 13432, 21978, 17229, 11359, 4327, 20983, 25053, 12101, 23091, 21166, 17696, 3816, 22830, 9781, 4399, 4102, 17903, 1146, 16348, 8851, 3056, 18343, 21274, 16960, 25159, 19497, 22296, 13755, 15906 ]
reddit_dump_0000GKP
[ [ "Zip files compress data making the overall file size smaller. That's not such a big deal today with broadband internet and file sharing services, but it was a pretty big deal a long time ago when it might take several minutes to send a file by email and store it on a smaller capacity drive. Every little bit you could save helped.", "171" ], [ "I currently live in a $160k house that I bought 10 years ago. I’m shopping for a new one now. Zillow says I can afford $450k. Redfin says I can afford $320k. My own comfort level says $250k. I believe in buying what you need, not in spending as much as you can possibly afford. I have other things I’d rather save for & spend money on. That’s why I’ve been in my cheap house for so long.", "488" ], [ "Democrat/Republican is political party affiliation.\n\nLiberal/Conservative is a position on issues. The terms are often used as blanket labels, but one person could easily have conservative opinions on issues regarding crime and liberal opinions on issues concerning same sex marriage. You can also consider yourself to be either liberal or conservative without being affiliated with the Democratic or Republican parties. The Libertarian party generally considers itself socially liberal and fiscally conservative.\n\nLeft Wing/Right Wing has become something of an insult. Liberal/Conservative is a spectrum. Not everyone falls on the same spot on the spectrum. These labels are usually reserved for people on the more extreme ends of the spectrum and they have opinions that the majority of others in the same group do not share.", "285" ], [ "Are you taking pictures just because you feel obligated to post something on social media? That sounds miserable if so. No wonder you have a block. Go take pictures just for fun & don’t post any of them. \n\nTry changing genres. Go shoot landscapes if you are usually a portrait person. Be a tourist in your own city & shoot the attractions. Pick up an interior design magazine from the library & try to take similar pictures at your house. Libraries are usually pretty cool. Take some pictures while you are there. Experiment with night photography, long exposures, macro, or some other new technique. I always have more fun when I’m practicing a new skill.", "560" ], [ "I switched to Apple as my primary service at the beginning of the year & dropped Spotify down to the free tier. They gave me a 3 months for $10 offer not long after that so I went back to premium. I think I’ll drop back down to the free tier after this. I still listen to the daily mixes sometimes but don’t use Spotify much other than that.", "465" ], [ "> \tIve been considering switching but i heard the user interface for apple isn’t as smooth.\n\nI did the Apple trial several times over the years and never liked the UI as much as Spotify. Tried it again this year and liked it. \n\nIn terms of UI, my biggest like compared to Spotify is that it responds to long press and you can customize the context menu to an extent. My biggest dislike compared to Spotify is that I have to use the < < arrows > > because I can’t swipe the cover art. \n\nAnother big plus is Apple doesn’t move UI elements around with every update.", "697" ], [ "> Spotify is still vastly superior in recommendations and music discover\n\nOne of the main reasons I went to Apple Music was that Spotify's recommendations had become so fine tuned after 5 years that it felt like every new song was more of the same and I was getting tired of it. At that point it didn't even matter if Apple's recommendations were worse than Spotify's because I was skipping over so many of Spotify's recommendations anyway. \n\nI've been very surprised and quite pleased with Apple's recommendations. It has come up with many songs I love that I still have never even heard on Spotify. I go back to Spotify every week for Discover Weekly, Release Radar, and to check the Daily Mixes. Going back to check now, I have added 15 songs to my library in the last 2 months. 8 came from Apple. 4 came from Spotify. 3 came from stuff I Shazamed.\n\nApple just added auto play at the end of albums and playlists which is one of the major features it was missing compared to Spotify. It does a pretty good job.", "21" ], [ "How would knowing someone's identity (a complete stranger to you) make a reporter's story more credible? You don't know anything about this source or their motivation for coming forward with the information. \n\nThe primary reason for a source to want to remain anonymous is fear of retaliation. It may be that a reporter would prefer to use a source they can credit, but given the choice of using an anonymous source or not getting the information at all, using the anonymous source is the better choice.", "624" ], [ "They run because they believe their party has the best platform and ideas on how to run the government. One of them could theoretically win the election next month. All it takes is enough people choosing not to vote for the garbage Democrat or Republican candidates.\n\nFYI, Libertarian got 5 million votes in 2016. Green got 1 million. Democrat & Republican got 65 million each. I can't even comprehend how 65 million people would have wanted either of those candidates to be president.", "313" ], [ "Joint checking account for shared expenses. Joint savings account for shared goals.\n\nYou decide whether each person contributes a fixed dollar amount, a fixed percentage of the expenses, or a fixed percentage of their income.\n\nWhatever each of you have left over after contributing to the joint account goes into your own personal account to spend or save as you please.", "290" ], [ "I've only taken a quick look at Playlisty, but it has a spot to paste links shared from Spotify in addition to direct access to your library. So you can copy the playlist link from any playlist (doesn't have to be in your library), and it will grab the songs from that. Not sure how Spotify could stop that from working other than shutting down the sharing features. It's probably not as full featured as what SongShift can do, but looks like it would work for the playlists you are talking about.", "391" ], [ "If you accidentally (or intentionally) delete a picture from your phone and go looking for it later, what happens on Apple compared to Google? If you end up wanting it back more than 30 days later you are shit out of luck with Apple. It will still be there on Google. That’s a backup. \n\nDo you use Time Machine or any other kind of backup on an external drive for your computer? Think about how much less useful that would be if you could never recover anything more than 30 days old. That’s how useless iCloud is as a backup. It is really good at sync though.", "697" ], [ "> \tpresumably to view your photos in order to be able to delete them, you have to browse your library, which is, I assume, \n\nPresumably and assume?? Are you trying to argue about a service that you don’t even use or know how it works?\n\n\n > \tAre you saying that if you delete a photo from your Google Photos library that it is never permanently deleted?\n\nNo, I’m saying that if you delete a picture from your phone, it is automatically deleted from iCloud whether you want it to be or not. AmIf that photo has already been backed up to Google Photos, it is not automatically deleted from there when you delete it from your phone. It remains on their servers safety backed up where you can view or retrieve it anytime you want. It’s that simple.", "697" ], [ "> \tIf I put an app full screen will the dock disappear?\n\nA maximized window like in Windows and full screen are 2 different things. The dock always disappears in full screen. You can set it to auto-hide when not in full screen mode so it only shows when you hover your cursor over the dock location. \n\n > \tDoes it have the snapping tool that I can just move an app to one side of the screen and it will fill this entire section?\n\nNo, but there’s a pretty decent $1 app called Magnet that will do this.", "707" ], [ "> \tFull screen is a very windows way of working.\n\nIt’s a task specific way of working for me, regardless of OS. Things like web browsers and file managers are generally not full screen. Anything that has content in the center and tool panels on the sides like photo or video editing will always be full screen. Other tasks might be best suited for two equally sized windows side by side. I spend equal time on Mac & Windows and work the same on both. If I am on a monitor 24” or smaller then everything is always full screen.", "707" ], [ "Maybe 1,000 songs in my library. \n\nI have never added an entire album. I never like every song on an album. No different than before streaming when I used to buy physical albums for specific songs and never listen to the others. \n\nI have playlists by year that I added songs to my library. I have 2 or 3 for mood. \n\nI most often listen to my library in recently added order. By the time I get tired of hearing songs, they have moved further down the list and get less play. I sometimes shuffle the entire library although I do it less often on Apple than I did on Spotify. I’m more likely to play my personalized station on Apple. I prefer random, mixed genres.", "854" ], [ "I’ve been wanting to replace my Gen 3 for about a year now but kept waiting for a new model. Finally said fuck it and bought a 4K on Black Friday when they were giving the $50 gift cards. It came with 1 year of ATV+ and the gift card covered 5 months of my music subscription. I don’t even care about a new one now. I couldn’t be happier to finally be rid of that Gen 3.", "352" ], [ "> \tInstagram is the most useless social network that does not improve the quality of life of people who scroll through the feed by looking at photos of celebrities\n\nYou’re using it wrong. \n\n > \tbut only makes you procrastinate and experience the worst feelings - anger, envy, oppression.\n\n\nYou’re definitely using it wrong. \n\n > \tI spend 2 hours a day looking for new music\n\n\nWith all the algorithms and curated & personalized playlists, you should not have to put much effort into this at all.", "611" ], [ "> \tShe’s the type who believes you should wash your dishes after you finish a meal; I will do them if/when I need to use the dishes\n\nStack them in the sink all day. Load & run the dishwasher before bed. Put away clean dishes in the morning while I drink coffee & browse the news. \n\n > \tShe wants to vacuum the carpet regularly, regardless of what it looks like; I don’t think it’s necessary until it looks noticeably dirty.\n\nI don’t have carpet. I spot sweep the floor as I see things that catch my attention. I vacuum/mop every 7-10 days.\n\n > \tDon’t get me started on dusting\n\nI never get started on dusting.", "713" ], [ "The city/county ordinance could be removed or changed. This would have no effect on the equivalent state law. \n\nAlso, police departments can make internal policies not to arrest and prosecutor offices can make internal policies not to prosecute. \n\nAll 3 of these things have happened where I live. You can no longer be arrested on a city marijuana charge and prosecuted in city court, but you could still be arrested and prosecuted for the exact same thing by using the state level charge instead. You only would have been charged on the city level for a misdemeanor anyway; they always use the state charge for felonies.", "260" ], [ "> \tWhy would I spend 2 dollars more for the same product at another grocery store?\n\nFor the satisfaction of never stepping foot into a Walmart, never getting irritated with people in their crowded aisles, not having the brands you like removed from the shelves and replaced with Great Value, never standing in a ridiculous line because 15 registers are closed. That’s the way I remember it anyway. I haven’t been inside a Walmart in 9 years.", "18" ], [ "> \tOne bathtub in ohio does not represent all bathtubs in America... like any product, sizes vary from tub to tub. Some\n\nI lived in 3 different homes with my parents and rented 5 different apartments before buying my own home. Every one of those places had the exact same 14” high alcove bathtub. I’m pretty sure that’s all that was used up to a certain point, so anything built before a certain year is going to have them unless it has been remodeled.", "229" ], [ "> Hannaford is owned by a Dutch company that isn't paying their employees any more money than Walmart is but is charging me a lot more money for the same product.\n\nI've never heard of Hannaford but I have no idea what employees are being paid anywhere I shop. I've never asked an employee at a grocery store, library, mechanic shop, or anywhere else how much they make. \n\n & #x200B;\n\n > I enjoy having money in a savings account a lot more than feeling smug about where I shop.\n\nI'm glad to be in a place where I no longer have to worry about that. I remember being irritated with my wife because she refused to go in a Walmart long before I stopped going. Her grocery trips were usually $25 or so more than mine - certainly not $2 per item. As I said, it's been a long time and prices have changed, so that could be different now.\n\nMost of my shopping now is at a small locally owned store that I pass on my way home where I can be in & out in just a few minutes without having to deal with crowded aisles and parking lots. It makes it a much more pleasant experience.", "18" ], [ "> \tSorry I’m not rich like you\n\nOr maybe we make the exact same money and I manage mine better or choose to spend it differently. I don’t go out to eat, I don’t have cable, I drive a car that’s been paid off for 10 years, I make all kinds of budget choices that allow me to buy groceries wherever I want.", "482" ], [ "> \tIf you aren’t getting paid with payroll taxes taken out in the US, then it isn’t a “real job”.\n\nThis is not correct. As long as you report your income and pay your taxes at the end of the year, that is all that is required. \n\n > \tBut it isn’t a real, legal job. Social Security thinks you aren’t working. The IRS and your state think you aren’t working. Unemployment thinks you aren’t working.\n\nThis is not correct. They know you are working when you file your taxes. They know you are working when you send in quarterly or annual tax payments. \n\nYou can have a W-2 job, you can have a 1099 job, or you can have a job that doesn’t fill out any forms and leaves it up to you. They are all the same to the IRS & Social Security. They get their money just the same.", "51" ], [ "There’s no way to make the suggestions go away, but if you subscribe to a couple podcasts all your suggestions should change to be more like that. You probably don’t even need to listen to them. Just look up dogs, books, cooking, exercise, finance, or whatever you like and subscribe to a couple. \n\nI am also annoyed by the podcasts. It’s one of the reasons I dropped down to the free tier and started using a different service.", "620" ], [ "I don't really believe that you are a poor person, but yes, poor people waste money on things just like rich people do. No matter what kind of ridiculous comment you make, that doesn't change the fact prioritizing items in your budget allows you to spend more money on the things that you prioritize. Basic financial literacy goes a long way.", "482" ], [ "> \tDon’t really care.\n\nApparently you do because here you are commenting on it. \n\n > \tFucking condescending piece of shit. \n\nI see your overall literacy is about as high as your financial literacy. \n\n > \tGood lord you rich people have your head shoved so for up your ass.\n\nAs you type on your expensive phone and high speed internet. \n\n > \tFinancial literacy is spending more money on the same food? Fucking moron lol.\n\nSince I e already explained it several times and you aren’t able to understand, I won’t bother to repeat it this time. I’ll wait for your next reply since you obviously want to keep the conversation going.", "482" ], [ "> \tMoron\n\nIs this your favorite word or did you just learn it today so you are trying to use it as much as you can?\n\n > \tI mean coming from the guy who thinks poor people should shop at fancy grocery stores I don’t think that means much lol.\n\nYou’re the one who brought up fancy grocery stores. You probably let it slip because that’s where you shop. I said I shop at a small locally owned store. Scroll back & see for yourself. \n\n > \tIf poor people have a busted out Iphone 5 and basic internet they should be rich enough to shop at expensive stores\n\nWhat’s your deal with the expensive stores? You are the only one fixated on shopping there. \n\n > \tNo explain again why spending more on the same food is “financial literacy”\n\nSpend less on one thing and you have more to spend on another thing. It’s a really simple concept. Maybe you shop at Walmart because you think you can’t afford anything else but at the same time you are grabbing a drink & snack at the gas station every day. Or smoking a carton of cigarettes a week. Or spending money on who knows what. If you wanted to shop at a less shitty place than Walmart, you might have money that can be saved somewhere else. \n\n > \tYou are the most condescending piece of shit I’ve come across.\n\nReally? You must have lived a very sheltered life if an internet conversation about grocery stores is your worst experience.", "18" ], [ "The Canon 100mm f/2 is a fantastic lens. It’s one of my favorites I’ve ever owned and I easily like the pictures as much if not more than my 70-200 f/2.8. I used the 100 on a 50D, 5D, and 6D. \n\nI have the Canon 28/<PHONE_NUMBER> combination. I have thought about trading them for the Sigma 35/1.4 & 85/1.4 for the convenience of having one less lens to deal with. I probably would if I shot with the primes more often. \n\nWhy are you looking at the Canon 85 instead of the Sigma? I might take the Sigma 85/1.4 over the 100 but not the Canon 85/1.8.\n\nI also have the Canon 16-35 f/4, 24-105, and the 17, 24, 50, 90 TS-E lenses. Even with all of those to compare it to, I still think the 100 has fantastic image quality.", "548" ], [ "> \tShe did pay, it was a $50 deposit and the total he charged was $190.\n\nAssuming prices have increased since then, I would either refund the money or give that amount as a credit towards today’s current session price. I would not reshoot at the old price after 2 years. Tell them it’s been too long for that. \n\nHe really should have refunded the money a long time ago and been done with them instead of waiting around to hear from the client again.", "610" ], [ "> \tThe Contacts app does it better.\n\nThere is no difference between the two. They look and function identically. \n\n > \tPersonally, I think the ‘edit contact’ function in the phone app should just open the Contacts app.\n\nI don’t see why the phone app needs the contacts tab at all. The area above the keypad where you can only paste a phone number should work like the messages app where you can type in a name or hit the + to scroll through your list from there.", "697" ], [ "> I haven’t noticed that but if that’s the case, it’s a huge improvement.\n\nI don't see it as an improvement since I can already play the songs in my library without the station.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > but what Apple Music severely lacks is functionality along the lines of “You have a a 10,000 song library that is hard to go through because it’s so large. Here are X, Y, and Z from your library!”\n\nMy Library > Songs > Shuffle. The way My Station is currently functioning for me isn't much different from this, except it has a concentration on recently added or played music. \n\n & #x200B;\n\n > I might want to listen to something like “My favorite metal songs from the 80s”, but there’s no way to do that besides manually creating a playlist.\n\nI would go to Library > Genres > Metal for this.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Think of iTunes Smart Playlists, but they’d function like filters, so you don’t have to manually create, manage, and delete them. You just select filter criteria and bam, you get it. That what Apple Music is sorely lacking.\n\nThis would be a great feature.", "697" ], [ "> Everyone says car warranties are huge rip offs and make you waste all your money.\n\nWarranties, like all insurance, are a gamble. You are betting that something bad is going to happen, and when it does, it will cost more to fix it than you paid in premiums. Usually that is not the case (which is why insurance companies are profitable), but the possibility is always there. It's a risk/reward situation that is different for everyone.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Why should I trust any mechanic? They make all their income off of car repairs. I'm sure they'd try to find as many things wrong with the car as possible. \n\nDo you feel that people working in all skilled trades are dishonest or only mechanics? What about doctors, plumbers, electricians, or other people you only see when something is wrong? They all make money by fixing things that are broken.", "396" ], [ "> I feel like everyone in my life kind of forgets about me unless I reach out to them. If I don’t reach out to them it could be weeks, or months before i’d even hear from them.\n\nFirst thing is to realize you have both gone the same amount of time without contacting each other. They may be thinking the exact same thing about you. \n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Some people I just gave up on because it is exhausting. What would you do in my position?\n\nI would contact them if they were important to me or not contact them if they are not important to me. Most of the people I have considered my best friends at some point in life I only see or talk to a few times a year now.", "204" ], [ "> But I'll guess I'll have to upgrade to Big Sur eventually. Staying on Mojave isn't really viable.\n\nI skipped Catalina on my desktop and just went from Mojave to Big Sur about a month ago. My laptop is still on Mojave.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Darn CS6 and it's lack of a non-subscription upgrade path (And Affinity is neat, but it still can't do everything that Illustrator can).\n\nI bought the entire Affinity suite last year when they first had the 50% off sale. I could replace Photoshop with Photo for the work I do (compositing, layering, luminosity masking). I had not previously used InDesign or Illustrator, so can't comment on how Designer or Publisher compare to those. They work well enough for the minimal use I'll give them though.", "44" ], [ "> Do I really need to be concerned about the speed of the drive (or connection) for the photos folder?\n\nI keep the current year's photos on my internal drive. I have everything else on a [12TB G-Technology RAID enclosure](_URL_0_) that uses 7200rpm HGST drives. I don't see any speed or performance differences when editing something from the internal drive compared to the external drive.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > I plan on buying a new Mac in the future, so maybe I need something fast so that I can work exclusively off the external drive.\n\nI'm using the drive I linked on a Mac. Thunderbolt connections are pretty fast.", "448" ], [ "Typical fitness requirements are pretty meaningless and aren’t that relevant to your job. I’d rather see practical things like dragging a 150lb dummy 50 yards away from a simulated car crash or jumping a fence in an obstacle course like you are chasing a crackhead through back yards. I guarantee you will never have to do a sit up in the line of duty.", "798" ], [ "So if you go to Edit > Edit Keyboard Shortcuts in the C1 menu, you see \"Edit With\" as a keyboard shortcut under the Image section? I want to see a screen shot of that.\n\nI've had 3 different versions of C1 installed on 3 different computers. I've never seen a keyboard shortcut for that. That would be one hell of a bug to affect different machines through different versions of the software. It also isn't listed in the documentation with the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. It should still be documented under the keyboard shortcuts even if a bug stopped it from working on a specific installation.", "707" ], [ "That’s more like it. There is no significant difference in fitness or ability to do the job between a person who can do 20 push-ups in 90 seconds and a person who can only do 15. As long as you can get yourself up off the ground quickly when you get knocked down, that’s the only push-up you need.\n\nThere was a time when I could do 60 push-ups in 1 minute. I can’t come close to that now, but I can bench press 100 pounds more than I could at that time. Which one means I’m in better shape? \n\nSame with running. 2 people might complete the course in the required time, but one did it in 12 minutes and can’t breathe while the other did it in 9 minutes and is ready to fight the bad guy. Both pass. What was the point?", "9" ], [ "Where I live, bicycles are required to use the road and follow the same traffic laws as cars. It is illegal to ride a bike on the sidewalk. \n\nIt is illegal for pedestrians to use the street *if* there is a sidewalk available. You are required to walk in the opposite direction of traffic when walking in the street. \n\nDespite having sidewalks available, I still walk in the street in my neighborhood. There are usually more walkers than there are cars.", "990" ], [ "It’s not strange to me. I’ve gone months without turning on my tv before and I will skip a week or so fairly regularly. When I do watch tv, it’s never more than a single episode of something. I get too bored just sitting there for hours. I don’t know how people can binge watch entire seasons of shows in a day.", "367" ], [ "> than what some of my friends paid for their wedding photographers.\n\nI could tell in the sentences leading up to this that you were talking about wedding photography. The things you said definitely do not apply to commercial photography.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > However, one type of photography still does sell well, portraiture. \n\nAdvertising, architecture, real estate, tourism, food, corporate events & headshots, plus many others are still doing very well.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > if I really wanted to I could maybe make 3K a month shooting portraitures full time\n\nYou can make a hell of a lot more than that.", "560" ], [ "> 3K is modest I guess\n\nIt's more than some people make with their full time jobs.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > again I think the barrier of entry for digital photography has gone down quite a bit in recent years\n\nSure, for Craigslist portrait photographers and the $500 wedding photographer. Even though that's what most people think of when trying to make some extra money from photography, it doesn't have to be that way at all. You could easily get a solid real estate portfolio by shooing your own home and a few of your family or friends. Send that out to some realtors and you can pick up an easy $1k per weekend shooting houses. Instead of shooting the low budget portrait, go for a slightly higher tier client and sell them an expensive album of their session. There's plenty of money to be made. Low barrier to entry is only affecting the lowest end of the market. You don't want to be there anyway.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > It's shocking what the iphone can do with its algorithms.\n\nAlgorithms can't get you clients, can't develop a connection or rapport with them, can't pose them, can't upsell them on wall art, can't know the best angle to shoot a room, and can't know the best way to light a product. They most certainly can't solve the million little problems that always come up during a shoot.\n\nPhones aren't taking business away from skilled or creative people. People who are already skilled or creative can use phones in amazing ways to increase their business though. Those are two totally different things.", "560" ], [ "> Most servers make $2.13/hr and nearly all their paychecks are $0.\n\nWhy would anyone willingly take a job that pays so little? Because they know customers are guilted into tipping and they end up averaging more per hour than most of their customers make.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > The hostess is making minimum wage and so is the kitchen.\n\nSo are tens of thousands of other people all over the country.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > If you are eating out I'm guessing you make more then minimum wage so what's the holdup on a couple bucks.\n\nBecause they have an employer who should be responsible for paying them.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Go to a drive thru\n\nHow much do you think the person at the drive thru makes?", "973" ], [ "> It's not their battle to get paid more by the employer because in America their position according to the Government is considered a tipped wage position.\n\nThis is a law that benefits the employer by allowing them to not pay their employees properly. It benefits the employee by allowing them to make much more than minimum wage. It screws the customer by making them subsidize the employer's payroll. This law could be changed, but the employers and the servers's don't want to change it. Why would a server fight for minimum wage when they can make double that under the current system?\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > If you feel guilted into leaving a tip then go to the drive thru or eat at home. \n\nI definitely do not feel guilted into leaving a tip. As I've already said, that's not my employee and it's not my job to pay them. I know other people feel the guilt though. Nobody *wants* to pay extra for a meal at a restaurant any more than they want to pay extra for groceries at the store.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Just appreciated for waiting on you\n\nThat's their job. Like anyone else with a job, they would be fired if they didn't do it.", "973" ], [ "> \tThe food would get much more expensive to absorb the cost that they’re currently saving by paying servers so little.\n\nSo you should start tipping the cashier at the grocery store so the price of food goes down. \n\n > \tPlus, not many people would receive exceptional service very often if servers were making regular ol’ minimum wage. What’s the incentive to ensure that your drink is full and your meal is correct if they’re making the same amount of money?\n\nI’m going to start taking this approach at my job. Either start paying me extra or I’m going to do shitty work. \n\n\n > \tIt doesn’t sound like you’ve ever worked in the industry\n\nI haven’t but my wife did for about 5 years. It would drive her crazy when I walked out without leaving a tip. I’ve said all these same things to her. She knew she could make more money at that alleged $2 job than she could anywhere else. \n\nMy neighbor is a very attractive bartender. She averages $300/night. Poor her working for tips.", "973" ], [ "There are no issues if he pays in full for all damages plus your rental while the truck is being repaired. I’ve done it on minor damage. \n\nThe risk is with him actually paying in full. You can get an estimate and demand that amount up front, but what if the shop finds more damage when they start taking things apart? What if the repair takes 10 days instead of the estimated 5 days and now your rental car bill just doubled? Will he pay the extra once it’s all done? You will have to if not.", "667" ], [ "Lightroom can do all of this. As long as you use Lightroom Classic and not Lightroom CC, all of your data will remain on your computer. You will have to set up an account with Adobe and pay for the subscription service.\n\nFor the editing part, you can hide that section so you never see it. You can turn off everything except the library and map screens.", "44" ], [ "> \tNot all of them are, actually - some can literally run on for 10 minutes and I can link you some if you like.\n\nYes, please provide a TikTok link for a 10 minute video. \n\n > \tEither way, don’t you think its a better idea to “blow off some stress” (aka try to kickstart your onlyfans butt pic career) when you’re not in a place where you’re better put to use saving people’s lives?\n\nIt makes no difference at all. \n\n > \tOr are you just omega simping for female nurses because you like ass? \n\nIf you want to see nurses showing their actual asses, there are Reddit subs for that.", "123" ], [ "I consider my tripod to be equally important as any camera or lens I own.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > My assumption is that it's definitely needed when using longer shutter speeds to reduce the chance of blur.\n\nIt eliminates blur from camera shake. It can help you capture motion blur from people, cars, clouds, or other things in your shot.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > It's also not very useful when photographing subjects that are moving around (for pretty obvious reasons).\n\nAs long as they are moving within the field of view of your lens, then you can still use a tripod. If you have the right kind of tripod head, then they can be moving anywhere. Wildlife photographers using super telephoto lenses shoot on tripods with gimbal heads.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > I've noticed from looking at videos that nature photographers (landscapes etc) very often use tripods. Is this because their subject isn't moving so they can take their time composing the shot? Therefore the tripod is more convenient rather than necessary?\n\nI'd argue that it is necessary. Careful, well thought out compositions can be the difference between a snapshot and a fantastic image.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > If you didn't have access to a tripod (say you accidentally left it at home or whatever), are there types of shots/settings that you just wouldn't bother with at all as you know there is no real point without the tripod?\n\nLots of them. It would be a lot harder to get landscape shots from high or low angles. I wouldn't be able to shoot brackets or multiple exposures for post processing later on. I wouldn't be able to use my 6 or 10 stop ND filters. I wouldn't be able to be in the shot. I wouldn't be able make changes to things in front of the camera while keeping the exact same composition.", "596" ], [ "> Release Radar: Spotify does a fantastic job of compiling a lengthy playlist that features new tracks from artists that I follow.\n\nAgree. Wish Apple had this. I use the MusicHarbor app to duplicate this functionality.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Daily Mixes: Spotify does a great job of compiling genre based daily mixes that play songs by artists in the same genre.\n\nThese used to be great, but not for a couple of years since Spotify changed the way they work. Now they are 75-85% music already in your library with barely any new music at all.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Home Page: Spotify consistently does a good job of keeping the content on the home page relevant and refreshed.\n\nAnd filled with podcasts, which I wish I could disable. I'm not overly impressed with the home page on either service.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Autoplay/ Radio stations: Spotify does an excellent job of populating radio stations based on both individual tracks and artists as well as what was previously playing.\n\nAgreed. I also like to seed playlists with 3-4 songs and play radio stations based on those. Apple's infinity play isn't as good as Spotify's autoplay, but it's not bad.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Apple Music’s now playing screen is minimal, which prevents quick access to adding/loving a song \n\nLong press > Tap, which while not as simple as Spotify, I've also never accidentally removed a song from my library with Apple because I mistakenly tapped the heart. Easy enough to add back, but then my chronological order of date added is screwed.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Queue: Apple Music allows users to choose whether the music they queue will be played in front of or after what is currently playing with its Play Next and Play Later Options.\n\nApple's queue is horrible in comparison to Spotify's. I hate it.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Apple Music also offers 4 personalized playlists for users based on listening history, however the Favorites, Get up and Chill Mix do not seem to be dedicated to new music discover based on my personal experience\n\nThey have about as much new music as a Daily Mix on Spotify. This week's Get Up Mix only has 7 songs from my library although almost everything is from a familiar artist. Chill Mix has 0 songs from my library. I love the Favorites Mix. I use it for my daily alarm, played through an automation.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > *Spotify:* Spotify sports Spotify Connect which allows a user to control playback via devices logged into the same account.\n\nThis is probably my biggest complaint about Apple Music. I can't even comprehend how with all the device integration and connectivity, my ipad has no idea what song is playing on my iphone and I can't control one from the other.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > *Spotify:* Spotify has an open API which allows other services and developers to create functionality and tools.\n\n[_URL_1_](_URL_0_) is awesome", "697" ], [ "I use the default Reminders app on my iPhone for this. One of my lists is nothing but recurring tasks. \n\nI’m not sure what you mean by it unchecks itself though. Mine shows as a task to be completed. I check it off when I am done. It shows as an overdue task if I don’t check it off. Once I mark it as complete, the next scheduled one shows up.", "672" ], [ "> \tIf the human race survives a thousand years, are we still going to have “first black person to walk on Jupiter” or “first woman to president of Saturn”? When do we stop with the novelty headlines and see people as people?\n\nThis isn’t a worldwide issue. It is particularly bad in the United States though. Look at how big of a deal we made about <PERSON> being the first woman Vice President, then look at all the female leaders around the world. This just shows how small minded we are in the US.", "227" ], [ "I’ve never had this problem. I prefer my home grilled burgers to most restaurant burgers. Restaurants use a lot of salt and butter, both on the patty and the bun. That’s one of the reasons I like them less, but also why many people like them more. \n\nI only use ground tenderloin for burgers. I’ve never used tenderizer on meat. If your meat has a gristly texture then you need to use higher quality meat (not mixed with lower quality meat).", "530" ], [ "> Who am I to tell people what to wear and how to wear their clothes/accessories right?\n\nYou are the one being paid to provide a quality service and deliver a quality product.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Would it be rude to send an email reminder a day or two in advance about this? If so how would you word it? Do you already have something like this in place?\n\nI am an architectural photographer, not a portrait photographer, but the same principle applies that the pictures will look best when the thing being photographed looks best.\n\nI send all clients a checklist in advance of the shoot to make sure all the common issues I encounter are addressed: remove signs or memos that are taped to windows, remove seasonal decorations, make sure all lights are in working order, raise all window shades to the same level, tend to lawns and flower beds to give a neat appearance, turn off sprinklers so we don't have puddles in the parking lot, etc.\n\nThere is no reason you can't send a similar checklist to your clients: Men - do these things, Women - do these things, Couples - do these things. This is where you give general advice to wear solid colors instead of prints, make sure clothing items are wrinkle free, suggest that couples wear complimentary or contrasting outfits, etc. As in the example of my list, it can be something short and to the point like \"turn off sprinklers\" or you can offer a little explanation so they understand why they should do what you ask like \"turn off sprinklers so we don't have puddles in the parking lot\". For you that could be \"small details make a big impact and we've noticed that manicured nails with fresh polish always take portraits up a notch.\"\n\nEveryone gets the same list with tips for men, women, and couples. Maybe everything on that list applies to a specific client or maybe nothing does. It doesn't matter. I'm just trying to make life easier on myself. Having a list that covers all topics also keeps clients from being offended by any particular items since it's obvious that it's a generic list that goes out to everyone. So when your woman with chipped nails coming in for a solo portrait sees that there is also stuff for men and couples on your list, it keeps her from being offended by any particular items and it shows her that you are experienced in working with a variety of clients and handling a variety of situations.\n\nThis is what you want -\n\nHi Client, don't forget our shoot next week. Here's a PDF with a list of small stuff that can help me get the best pictures of you. See you soon.", "560" ], [ "All pictures and catalogs are stored on external drives and backed up to a second set of external drives. I have 32TB of external storage that sits on my desk. The current year's projects are also stored on my internal drive and a portable drive that I keep with me. All internal and external drives are backed up online to Backblaze.\n\nAll edited pictures are exported as JPG and stored in an archive section of my website in a year\\\\month\\\\date-subject folder structure. I started this archive in 2007 and have tens of thousands of pictures stored here. Phone pictures are duplicated on iCloud and Google Photos. The ones I really like have been saved to my computer and become part of the external drive backup.", "171" ], [ "> I like to use a shortcut (e.g. ⌘-9) to switch to a certain vault. The vaults are ordered alphabetically, and because I just created a new vault, which ended up somewhere in the middle of all the others, the numbers have shifted as well. ⌘-9 now lands me in a different vault.\n\nInstead of Personal, Work, you can use 1-Personal, 2-Work. That will keep them in the order you want. I don't do this, but I do use one with a ! and one with a z to keep them at the top/bottom of the list.", "446" ], [ "> I love the car, but I'm considering selling it for $14,000 and using that money to buy a car that is worth $24,000 that is newer and more reliable.\n\nIn what way is your current car unreliable? Timing chain is a known, scheduled maintenance item that is probably listed in the owner's manual. 84,000 miles shouldn't be much more than half of the car's expected life span. \n\n & #x200B;\n\n > Does it make sense to invest money into a paid off car\n\nYes, to a certain point. That point is subjective to each person. You may be able to pay that $2000 and drive it maintenance free for a few more years. That would be more cost efficient that replacing it if cost efficiency is your primary concern.\n\nThe only thing that doesn't make sense is to pay for the maintenance then sell it shortly after anyway because you can't resist getting a newer car.", "352" ], [ "> When slightly more than a majority of our Senators, for example, are women; then it won’t be a very big deal.\n\nIt's already not a big deal to me. New media has a specific goal of attracting viewers and readers though, so they use headlines to get that attention. After the first woman it is first black woman, then first black gay woman, then first black gay woman under the age of 35, then first ....\n\n > Until then, you need to question why, in this example, so many men, a disproportionate number in fact, are ending up in positions of decision making and power.\n\nThe simplest and most common answer is because women aren't running for these positions. You can't elect a candidate that's not on the ballot. There has never been a female candidate for Sheriff or Police Chief where I live. Our sheriff is elected and the police chief is appointed by the mayor (currently a female), but I don't think she considered any female candidates when she made her appointment.\n\nOn the other hand, my city/state has had a female governor, mayor, state & US representatives & senators, city council members, state agency department heads, and most other positions. Despite this, I guarantee there will be \"first female police chief\" headlines when that time comes.", "497" ], [ "There’s nothing wrong with cinnamon. No need to remove that. There’s also nothing wrong with peanut butter, but you need to use the types with only 2 or 3 ingredients- skip the sugar and additives or grind your own. \n\nI like shakes for breakfast. My favorite is 1 frozen banana, 1 container Greek yogurt, 1/2 cup oats, 2 tbsp almond butter or ~35g whole almonds, and 1/2 cup water or milk. That’s about 600 calories, 30g protein, 60g carbs, 25g fat. I can make it & drink it in under 5 minutes. It usually keeps me full for a few hours.", "559" ], [ "> \tWhat’s to watch on Amazon except for the 3 or so good shows they have? \n\nThis is how I feel about every streaming service. It takes 1 year on average to make a season of a show and 1 week to watch it, and none of them have much that I want to watch in the first place. This is why I cycle between them and sometimes go weeks or even months with no tv service at all. I haven’t had anything at all in a couple months now but might take advantage of Hulu’s $1.99 Black Friday special for a month or two.", "526" ], [ "If you are freelancing and you are soley responsible for the entire project from start to finish, then no one cares what you use as long as you deliver the product.\n\nIf you are working for someone else, then of course they are. You will likely be using the software they provide. You may be part of a team where projects are worked on by multiple teams or individuals and your part needs to be compatible with someone else's part. You may need to pull up last year's project. There's probably no room for someone using Affinity in an Adobe operation.\n\nJust in terms of you learning, the are definitely differences, but the Affinity products are similar enough to Adobe products that you could get by in either one if you know the other. You obviously won't be proficient since there will be slightly different workflows, tool icons, keyboard shortcuts, etc but you'd figure it out. Affinity would be good enough for a job that requires familiarity with Adobe but not for a job that required proficiency with Adobe.", "561" ], [ "> I've gotta admit, after looking into it a bit, I'm tempted to give Affinity Designer a try.\n\nI've been using Photoshop & Lightroom for well over 10 years. I've never used Adobe InDesign or Illustrator or any other similar product. I bought the entire Affinity suite in April when it was on sale. I created a promotional PDF in Designer (which integrates nicely with Photo) the day I bought it, sent it to a potential client, and got the job I was soliciting. It's very good software and definitely worth the sale price.", "44" ], [ "> Capture One Pro: expensive, doesn't support DNGs, limited DAM; very advanced raw editing (too advanced for me)\n\nCurious how lack of DNG is a drawback for you? It's not a default for any camera or editing software that I know of. I'm a long time Adobe user and never convert my files to DNG.\n\nIf you can use Lightroom, then Capture One is not too advanced for you. They have almost identical sliders that do the same thing. They even have a menu option (Window > Workspace > Migration) that configures all the tool panels and placement to mimic Lightroom to make the transition easier. \n\nIn terms of DAM, it is not as good as Lightroom for my specific workflow but it does have keywords, smart collections, star ratings, color labels, and most of the other tools Lightroom has. \n\nC1 is 30% off for Black Friday so it's a good time to buy if you want it.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nDoes Windows have a built in photo editing tool that is good enough for your needs? If so, you can use Adobe Bridge for DAM (it's free) and use whatever Windows has to edit your pictures.", "44" ], [ "I started in 2006. I went from RawShooter > Lightroom (Adobe bought RawShooter) > Capture One > Aperture > Lightroom > Capture One. I still have the Lightroom subscription but have primarily been using Capture One for the past year. I've never used Acdsee.\n\n[I just saw a new sale this morning](_URL_0_): Capture One 20 for $199, free upgrade to v21 when it comes out in a few weeks, plus a $25 gift card to either B & H Photo or Adorama depending on where you choose to buy it.\n\nCapture One frequently has 25% - 30% sales through out the year, so you can always wait for one of those for future upgrades to keep your costs down. You also don't need to upgrade every version. I'm skipping 21.", "888" ], [ "> On the PC desktop app specifically, I once could click an artists name in my Artist's Collection page, and it would show me all the thumbed tracks from that artist. I used this all the time, and now these links just take you to the artist's page. \n\nSame on Mac\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > I can't fine a way to view all thumbed tracks from a single artist, other than searching through my Liked Songs playlist, which also doesn't work.\n\nAre you using the search bar or the filter bar (does windows have that?). Using the filter bar directly above the song list but below the search bar should do exactly what you want.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n > I don't know why Spotify likes removing features, but a quick look through this sub's posts tells me it's nothing new.\n\nIt's definitely nothing new. It's the main reason I dropped down to the free tier and moved to Apple Music.", "391" ], [ "Many administrative traffic laws in a state will apply only to vehicles registered in that state. For example, if your car is registered in a state that requires front and back plates, you can not be ticketed for having a back plate only outside of your home state. If your state does not require an inspection sticker or emissions test, you can't be ticketed for not having that when you are in a state that does require it.\n\nMoving violations like speeding, turn signals, wearing a seatblet are enforced on everyone no matter where the car is registered. It's your job to be aware of the laws in the places you travel. If your state did not require seatbelts for your specific vehicle and it was not manufactured with them, then you could not be ticketed in another state for not having them. If it has them and you choose not to wear it, then you could still be ticketed in a state that requires you to wear it.", "353" ], [ "I quit drinking soda maybe 10 years ago. I stopped buying it at the store so it was never in my house for me to drink. I would still drink them whenever I went out to eat. Over time, I went out to eat less often so also had sodas less often. Eventually I was having them so infrequently that it was easy to just stop. \n\n > \tItll be hard since I work in fast food and they dont have much stuff besides soda lol\n\nBring a refillable water bottle to work.", "1002" ] ]
435
[ 21725, 20044, 22363, 18983, 4629, 600, 11555, 13972, 17644, 13345, 16092, 23894, 13334, 14236, 23265, 18525, 9999, 19329, 14493, 2157, 14429, 22366, 17497, 12136, 14937, 18399, 8737, 18711, 8214, 12964, 1670, 22494, 17667, 8764, 12737, 17056, 11557, 5029, 18333, 17340, 13904, 23593, 12596, 15409, 13953, 14201, 15670, 21829, 9374, 8994, 15591, 13687, 15600, 15914, 12980, 11034, 18243, 5141, 11638, 13851, 8948, 10912, 17881, 19234, 15363, 13013, 21698, 23807, 18387, 23340, 17275, 13023, 25105, 14448, 16073, 18105, 19126, 24687, 25265, 5068, 4596, 18692, 19026, 11086, 3192, 14597, 25219, 24333, 22789, 17847, 15595, 4625, 11121, 9892, 14853, 14629, 20616, 165, 6255, 14868, 1678, 9129, 25249, 16107, 13090, 7264, 18966, 9955, 13439, 18807, 15806, 11398, 25338, 15839, 6734, 305, 3280, 1935, 10953, 8610, 17935, 12385, 20242, 8715, 23861, 440, 18090, 17143, 20603, 13348, 8868, 18007, 6877, 10357, 15824, 21884, 17951, 4015, 14754, 3743, 15857, 17084, 23494, 17979, 18455, 2415, 24476, 13059, 14579, 22814, 25422, 6497, 6784, 16540, 23983, 17064, 5069, 10421, 4335, 16242, 15455, 298, 24686, 17146, 17773, 19588, 2393, 24783, 16523, 17642, 6618, 17331, 14947, 7629, 22196, 22519, 4515, 17287, 19214, 23575, 23159, 20340, 21817, 24989, 12793, 3581, 10077, 9377, 25352, 23052, 11875, 7240, 23764, 1507, 10640, 19463, 21005, 1629, 24314, 8509, 22935, 24642, 14949, 1902, 7282, 4392, 9343, 14859, 15228, 18778, 23324, 1012, 15618, 1332, 6369, 17599, 21916, 24182, 23986, 15488, 16905, 14866, 22278, 23037, 14277, 7919, 5737, 23415, 20398, 2623, 5696, 23820, 14885, 19094, 1059, 18357, 15897, 12291, 10744, 19424, 25168, 7757, 10696, 24260, 18672, 23165, 19567, 10063, 7908, 23363, 18985, 1238, 21404, 11290, 19977, 24970, 11948, 3686, 12621, 18957, 851, 14187, 20460, 302, 20131, 18438, 15399, 8794, 4072, 19831, 219, 9068, 24635, 431, 8817, 16015, 20976, 865, 12283, 22677, 22687, 6113, 8080, 2537, 18002, 3020, 3439, 22415, 20496, 22798, 9051, 10735, 9756, 19526, 20849, 15420, 14948, 20933, 9270, 4875, 1850, 575, 6828, 3760, 13325, 22002, 4020, 16366, 2148, 9599, 6061, 8692, 19520, 21570, 24694, 20442, 12021, 14069, 8108, 25385, 499, 6551, 3969, 3997, 4352, 10977, 15280, 10483, 11551, 3591, 20776, 17173, 22007, 22839, 13353, 5071, 980, 20132, 25354, 1950, 4876, 20165, 6961, 17191, 10510, 1185, 2801, 12232, 20013, 10394, 2275, 23063, 3532, 5881, 19679, 14457, 16934, 17680, 1203, 10474, 25130, 17169, 14952, 15043, 18831, 17457, 3922, 18984, 17525, 16447, 21454, 17768, 16140, 20595, 11537, 79, 16486, 7561, 11289, 22497, 2583, 9411, 5967, 10291, 23041, 4703, 24520, 7832, 8132, 9357, 17639, 21147, 25066, 24739, 14306, 11180, 9389, 18054, 20837, 19172, 6006, 3187, 10832, 23658, 19165, 18888, 13916, 12018, 23163, 17203, 11120, 5570, 21156, 14205, 17164, 372, 22973, 4068, 14202, 825, 16623, 15855, 7443, 20336, 19277, 10084, 1779, 349, 19855, 24866, 13453, 2681, 8383, 53, 1967, 15148, 20836, 3261, 6340, 7654, 15642, 7338, 24313, 13801, 13908, 10244, 2915, 23930, 12978, 701, 19109, 18400, 11499, 18390, 18274, 18393, 6804, 20602, 307, 20991, 23696, 9045, 4163, 14313, 20877, 9633, 7752, 5750, 1071, 17079, 5411, 1402, 11320, 11666, 3849, 14508, 25438, 7543, 12949, 18196, 11783, 13224, 12725, 24093, 12338, 11408, 7161, 2294, 20895, 17614, 21000, 1079, 15734, 1612, 5968, 4228, 19020, 17439, 1327 ]
reddit_dump_00093293
[ [ "I really enjoyed the episode, but I like these characters.\n\nWhen this show does an episode dedicated to certain characters and not others, there will always be people that say it is \"filler\".\n\nI am sure the people that like the <PERSON> character loved her episode, while I thought it was a horrid filler.\n\nI wouldn't expect much more this season though, the way they have mapped out the show it looks like the rest of season will be stalling until the All Out War stuff starts next season, hopefully in episode 1.\n\nedit: this is such an odd show. Brilliant moments pepper sprayed onto a bland soap opera-ish format.", "513" ], [ "I think the point of that scene, or his reaction, was to show us that the Saviors aren't mindless killer robots that worship <PERSON>.\n\nThey are just people, and are as different as any group of people can be. The guy that shot the kid is the idiot on a power trip type, while the leader of that small group is the type that would rather be back at home restoring his hot rod or something.\n\nThey are a good mix of people that are trying to survive by any means necessary - and shooting that kid was not necessary for the situation. All that guy wants to do is pick up <PERSON>'s tribute so he and his loved ones can survive another day.\n\nI could be wrong, but that's my take anyway.", "942" ], [ "Shit, I never thought about how little you really knew about the guy yet he was one of the best characters.\n\nThat is definitely due to the actor.\n\nI know this gets said with every other comment about the walking dead on reddit but it's a shame that there are these talented actors that get the material that they get and just have to work it for all they can. If that makes sense.", "735" ], [ "Sorry Sweden.\n\nI have no idea why our idiot president and his cult have decided to single out your country as the hotbed of terrorism that it isn't.\n\nThere are <PERSON> cultists working day and night, feverishly working to find some kind of evidence of a white person being hurt by someone with a dark skin color in your country - as if that has anything to do with America or her interests.\n\nBelieve me, there are people here that would want nothing more than an attack in your country by a muslim. To them it will prove something, they don't know what it will prove, but it will prove something to them.\n\nApologies,\n\nAmerican Citizen", "690" ], [ "These things happen.\n\nI have had a strange dynamic between my mother and her mother.\n\nMy grandmother has been a godsend unto me, and the complete opposite with her daughter - my mother.\n\nIf my grandmother passed away tomorrow it would be traumatic to me but great for my mother, who I love and I want the best for.\n\nIt has and always will be the strangest relationship I can ever imagine anyone having. Someone you love more than anything - two people, being strangely dependent on the other one in a terrible way. Ugh... dont ask me to take sides", "981" ], [ "*During the Cold War*\n\nRepublicans: We hate Russia!\n\nDemocrats: Wait bro, why do you hate Russia so much?\n\n*After the Cold War*\n\nRepublicans: We love Russia!\n\nDemocrats: Wait a fucking second, why do you love Russia so much?\n\n*goddamnit*\n\nSeriously, ever since the Cold War ended, Republicans really haven't had much of a rallying cry against anything. Sure, they stood against things, but never really had a reason to. They hated things, but didn't know why they did.\n\nThe only real motivation for Republicans after the Cold War seems to be money.", "853" ], [ "This is really great press for him --- makes me wonder if he didn't do this type of shit on purpose.\n\nHe can use this as a rallying cry for free money. I am sure there are a lot of racists that aren't bright enough to understand that he doesn't need it and there are a lot of <PERSON> cult members that aren't even racist that will donate to him, because, <PERSON>.\n\nIt is a good time to be in the business of racism. I bet he makes a lot of money shilling his bullshit on behalf of the pussies on the right that are too scared to come out as a racist in public, so they would rather speak through him.\n\nI bet he does well for himself, seriously.", "936" ], [ "Only once.\n\nDallas TX, March 8th 1997.\n\n<PERSON> was fresh out of law school, he saw an opportunity in the used women's panties business. He set up a racket in Austin, TX., out of an abandoned washing machine factory on the outskirts of town.\n\nThe markup was considerable, and the market was ripe --- so he took the chance. The only problem was that he needed the financing, so he contacted an old acquaintance, a woman he knew during his foot fetish days by the name of <PERSON>.\n\nNow back then this <PERSON> was a looker, nice tits, perfect ass, and oh yeah, a sleeper for the Saudi National Intelligence Agency, funded by the <PERSON>-bin Laden group which no one wants to talk about anymore. She set him up with a guy, this <PERSON> fella, who owned or controlled a lot of the oil concerns in east and south Texas.\n\nSo these three met up that day in March and things just kinda went from there. You can check wikipedia for their background information, but none of what I just wrote will be on there. No one seems to care anymore.\n\nNo one wants to bring up the silent partner either... a man by the name of...\n\n<PERSON>", "898" ], [ "Are the Never-Trump Republicans the only actual Republicans?\n\nBecause <PERSON> isn't an R or a D or anything. He is just himself, just a self-serving billionaire that ran on the R side so he could get elected. He has even said this --- like, clearly said this, that he had to run as a Republican because their base is a lot dumber than the Democratic base.\n\nHe probably thought he couldn't get far if he ran on the side with the long time favorite <PERSON>, as well.\n\nShit, now I wonder if the people that voted for <PERSON> realize that they aren't Republicans.\n\nWho is a Republican anyway? That party has morphed into some other beast entirely. Hell, just a few years ago being Republican just meant that you were a Democrat that hated gays and poor people. Now it means that you hate a lot of other things too.\n\nedit: nope, false. He never said that, cleared by snopes. here is the link to the CNN article explaining it, thanks to /u/khouli - _URL_0_", "800" ], [ "Just wanted to comment, I am sorry /r/reactiongifs, I hate <PERSON> on a cellular level, but this shouldn't be here. I have only been on reddit for a few months and I know this.\n\nI wonder what reddit was like before this buffoon ran for president. Not having every popular sub inundated with anti-Trump shit for stupid upvotes or whatever.\n\nI mean, I understand --- I get it. The man makes me embarrassed, as an American, on a daily/hourly basis, but still... I would have liked to have seen reddit before the election.", "247" ], [ "heh, never thought of it like that, but yeah, they are the political <PERSON>.\n\nHer and her ugly siblings will be on TV and other media bullshit for the rest of their lives. Nothing they have done proves them to be any less shameless than their father.\n\nI just hope people leave the smallest one out of it for as long as possible. I know most people don't give a shit, \"He's growing up the son of a billionaire so fuck him!\" but he is just a little kid, embarrassed as fuck because of his father. Growing up with a shitload of money doesn't make his life any better than a kid growing up in a normal middle class family.\n\nI wouldn't trade my normal middle class upbringing for his ultra wealthy one, never ever ever. Ugh, I feel sorry for that little guy", "614" ], [ "I had a free cell phone with unlimited everything for over a year because the company I had it thru was bought out by a major telecom company.\n\nI had a direct withdrawal type thing set up and neither company would take money out of my account for the bill. I called both companies trying to get someone to take the money but they kept blaming the other company for not doing their job right.\n\nI talked to both companies like 3 or 4 times each and neither would set up the bill to be taken out, but the phone stayed on so I just got a free phone out of the deal. No bill for over a year - it was awesome. This was probably 7 or 8 years ago.\n\nEdit: I guess this isn't really a traditional story of \"luck\", but somehow my account fell through the cracks during the buyout of the company, so I think it was a pretty lucky deal", "882" ], [ "Well... I don't know where you were going with this, but I think I kinda know...\n\nHarvard is a pretty good mix of diversity, yeah, all cultures. I think you are seeing more diversity in the past 50 years there because the place has become more open to letting people of other races in not because of affirmative action bullshit but because the culture has just changed.\n\nWith that said, there are a TON of students there because their parents know people.\n\nThere are a TON of students there because they are the best of the best in their field.\n\nOverall it can kind of be a disheartening experience, they don't let anyone fail, seriously, it is hard to fuck up once your in.", "205" ], [ "He was growing into middle age...\n\n \nand was living then in a bungalow\non Woodland Avenue.\n\n \nHe installed himself in a rocking chair...\n\n \nand smoked a cigar down\nin the evenings...\n\n \nas his wife wiped her pink hands\non an apron...\n\n \nand reported happily\non their two children.\n\n \nHis children knew his legs...\n\n \nthe sting of his mustache\nagainst their cheeks.\n\n \nThey didn't know how their father made his living \nor why they so often moved.\n\n \nThey didn't even know their father's name.\n\n \nHe was listed in the city directory\nas <PERSON>.\n\n \nAnd he went everywhere unrecognized...\n\n \nand lunched with Kansas City\nshopkeepers and merchants...\n\n \ncalling himself a cattleman\nor a commodities investor...\n\n \nsomeone rich and leisured\nwho had the common touch.\n\n \nHe had two incompletely healed\nbullet holes in his chest...\n\n \nand another in his thigh.\n\n \nHe was missing the nub\nof his left middle finger...\n\n \nand was cautious,\nlest that mutilation be seen.\n\n \nHe also had a condition that was referred to \nas \"granulated eyelids\"...\n\n \nand it caused him to blink \nmore than usual...\n\n \nas if he found creation\nslightly more than he could accept.\n\n \nRooms seemed hotter\nwhen he was in them.\n\n \nRains fell straighter.\n\n \nClocks slowed.\n\n \nSounds were amplified.\n\n \nHe considered himself\na Southern loyalist and guerrilla...\n\n \nin a Civil War that never ended.\n\n \nHe regretted neither his robberies,\nnor the 17 murders that he laid claim to.\n\n \nHe had seen another summer under\nin Kansas City, Missouri... and on September 5th in the year 1881...\n\n \nhe was 34 years old.", "898" ], [ "That whole movie is a work of art.\n\nI am not a film critic, hell I am not even that smart of a person, but that movie is a modern masterpiece of cinema.\n\nI don't know what was in the water at the time, but it came out in 2007 along with There Will Be Blood and No Country For Old Men, two of the other most important movies made in the past 20 years.\n\nWell, that's what I think anyway", "472" ], [ "This couldn't have came out better for the man, honestly. I think it showed he made a shitload of money and paid a shitload of taxes. And it is from *years* ago, which can also be used as an advantage.\n\nYeah buddy, that word \"genius\" gets thrown around waaaay too much, but if this was on purpose, I have to give serious respect to this administration. This is some House of Cards shit.\n\nOh, and now they get to hang the \"hey bro... you releasing that was illegal as fuck!\" over that woman's head (and the network too)\n\nquick ninja edit: I think tomorrow would be the first day I would be looking forward to a press conference if I was <PERSON> or <PERSON> himself.", "747" ], [ "As it should be.\n\nI can separate the person from the work - one of my favorite TV shows that is currently on is Girls, <PERSON> show that she writes/produces/directs. I love her show but I doubt I could stand being alone with her in real life for more than 30 seconds. She seems like an abysmal person.\n\nI was looking forward to <PERSON>'s Netflix special because I don't pre-hate anyone, not even on the joke-theft shit. I just want to be entertained. I don't care that her jokes are \"muh vaginer\" jokes either, as long as they are funny.\n\nThat stand up special was fucking horrible, and I watched the whole thing. I actually *waited* for it to get better while it was on.\n\nPeople can have an off night or an off stand-up routine/special (looking at <PERSON> latest one, it just didn't \"hit\"), but The Leather Special from <PERSON> is one of the worst headliner stand up acts I know of.\n\nEdit: I really liked Trainwreck, as an \"it's on HBO and nothing else is on\" kind of a movie. If you don't already hate her, then check it out if it is on TV or streaming for free", "323" ], [ "<PERSON> talks about joke theft quite a bit. His bit on <PERSON> and joke theft in general is totally worth a listen - it is pretty cool to hear a major comedian talk openly about how this kind of stuff just happens all the time, and the different ways it goes down.\n\nI am pretty sure this is the one: _URL_0_", "371" ], [ "Yeah this doesn't surprise me at all. At least I watched it and actually hated it. And I wanted to love it. But I only chuckled a few times.\n\nThis reminds me of the ghostbusters movie. It was just a dumb paint by numbers cash-in movie with stale overused jokes. It was a 4/10 movie, not a .000001/10 movie like everyone says. Just a cookie cutter waste of material.\n\nedit: my god, I just read that article. I really, really hope the people that dedicate their days to that type of thing are just bored children. If you are a grown man and writing a negative review for someone's book or ranking <PERSON>'s special with your little group or whatever, you are the most pathetic type of person and I actually feel sorry for you. I wish your life had turned out different.", "43" ], [ "I said this a few days ago on another thread, different story but same deal.\n\nThese \"pay of your debts\" stories have been clickbaity bs on sites like yahoo and the like for years and years. The stories are usually about as out of touch with reality as you can get, sometimes it makes me wonder if they are completely made up as a joke by the writer, or if the writer is also completely lost on the reality of the middle/working class in the US, or anywhere, for that matter.\n\nNext time you see one of these stories, click on it for fun if the website doesn't give your phone cancer. They are actually fun to read if you are expecting the ridiculousness", "434" ], [ "Wow, okay, I thought it might have been me - I watched it by myself, which is weird for me, especially with a comedy special.\n\nThat audience was confusing - almost hostile at some points. I felt like <PERSON> was having to re-explain the joke to the audience at some parts. The crowd at that taping seemed like a crowd that was expecting a different comedian or something --- or maybe the microphones were off... either way I can't believe they decided to use that crowd/those recordings as the special.\n\nI'm reading more about it and it looks like that is the consensus", "186" ], [ "Whenever you shoot a video like this, you never get a permit and do it above board, but you do have lookouts to make sure that no one that shouldn't see you can see you. They are just out of the camera/mic's reach.\n\nI'm not talking about armed security or some shit, lol, just a couple guys that are working on the crew will keep a look out. You don't wanna get caught doing this shit if you are a business, it is a huge pain in the ass.", "123" ], [ "Your comment is in bad taste and is quite inflammatory. And I couldn't agree more.\n\nThis is a fucking shame, a travesty that the guy has to dedicate his income to paying for a child that isn't his. And why? Because he didn't contest it for over two years? What a bullshit loophole to use. Jesus.\n\nWell I am sorry that he raised a child as his own and didn't know until it was too late. If there is ever a ruling that needs to be turned over it is this one, my God.. this is what drives people to insanity and murder suicide... fuck!", "405" ], [ "Whenever I think that the men's rights activist guys are fucking nutjobs, a story like this comes out and totally redeems them.\n\nI don't blame you guys at all. The divorce stories I read on here sound like fucking nightmares that you would have when you are at your lowest point in life, and like the second or third comment said, this is what leads to fucking murder/suicide shit. Damn.", "486" ], [ "Absolutely. There is no higher art form he is ascribing to, and he has no one to impress. He is just having fun with his friends while a camera happens to be on.\n\nHell, he has pretty much admitted that he chooses the location of the movie for the next place his fam wants to vacation. Unless someone made that up, it totally makes sense.\n\n<PERSON> is, ironically for reddit, the most authentic and least pretentious filmmaker I know of. You would think reddit would love him for it lol.\n\nWell reddit probably would if he could get some help - his movies are really, really bad sometimes.", "192" ], [ "It is the same guy that wrote for the Little Mermaid and Aladdin. Like, all of the Aladdin songs.\n\nedit: Look him up, if you are anywhere near my age, this guy had a pretty big impact on your life.\n\n_URL_0_\n\nedit 2: I should be more clear since this is getting a lot of attention. <PERSON> worked in collaboration with <PERSON>, who wrote the music. <PERSON> was a lyricist. Kinda like <PERSON>, he writes music and <PERSON> writes the lyrics. Well, for most of <PERSON>'s songs.", "213" ], [ "A song writing partnership that was cut short.\n\nThe other one that blows my mind is the <PERSON>. They were together for what, like 8 years is all?\n\nEdit: The amount of time the <PERSON> were together blows my mind because almost any other band, you look at what they have done in double that time and it pales in comparison.\n\nI guess that's what happens when you pair up two of the best songwriters in the history of rock n roll though.", "419" ], [ "The <PERSON> shooting was so fucking horrible.\n\nEverything about it.\n\nIt really opened my eyes to the problem of police training or police culture in our country. Watch that video again, the woman sitting next to <PERSON> has more composure under pressure, while having a gun on her, than the cop does in that situation.\n\nShe is actually easing the tension of the situation - or at least doing her best to, given what had just happened. Thank God that woman thought of turning on the phone so we could see the situation.\n\nThe <PERSON> shooting is the one that really opened my eyes to the problems our modern police force in America has. I mean, when the girlfriend of the man that was just shot is the grownup in that situation, the person deescalating the situation, we have some fucking problems in this country.\n\nThat cop should have never been issued a firearm.", "399" ], [ "Man, they got a Nor'easter there didn't they?\n\nCompletely unrelated, the television program American Horror Story is a silly show that has gotten quite awful throughout the years, but season two takes place at a mental hospital, and one of the episodes takes place during a Nor'easter - in fact I think that is the name of the episode.\n\nThat season is soooo good. Good luck with the other seasons tho, ugh", "420" ], [ "Everyone that has read it seems to have the same opinion.\n\nI haven't read it but I have read the summary or synopsis - I am totally fine with HBO doing this and whatever the hell else they can make money from GoT wise - as long as they keep up the HBO production value that they are famous for, especially in regards to GoT.\n\nFucking casting is soooooo good\n\n<PERSON> edit: I am pretty sure that this is the series or whatever that <PERSON> wants to adapt. He favors it more than anything else because that is where the story is. <PERSON>'s rebellion would be a great season or two worth of storytelling but <PERSON> seems to think that Dunk and Egg would be the truly great next installment in the universe - at least the proper one to adapt on HBO", "88" ], [ "I am 30.\n\nI deeply regret not joining the military, as long as I could have done my four to eight years without a direct combat role. 6 out of 10 guys I know that came back from Iraq are fucked in the head and they were absolutely not that way when they went off to basic.\n\nThose 6/10 all received absurd amounts of pay that they wish they could get back if you could delete their memories and replace them with mine, comfortable and in college, banging slutty girls and not remembering what you did last week.\n\nI hope this doesn't offend anyone that served - but if it does - you probably didn't see much action. That shit fucks up most anyone, and thank fucking Christ I didn't sign up. I don't need that in my life.", "920" ], [ "We have devil worshipers on Mars, confirmed.\n\nSeriously though, how amazing!\n\nThis picture and everything about it, my goodness. I cannot wait til we get to explore this planet!\n\nedit: I just realized the extent of our technology, another redditor commented that this doesn't even faze people at all. The fact that this photo exists and like 400 people on the planet care shows how far along we are with technology. amazing.", "366" ], [ "I'm sorry, I meant as a person.\n\n<PERSON> raped and physically abused his first wife, cheated on her with the second, bragged about being able to walk in on naked girls in a beauty pageant, bragged about the power dynamic that a powerful, wealthy man has over a powerless female, and he has bragged about the body of his daughter, even saying it was \"okay to call her a piece of ass\" on the <PERSON> radio program.\n\nI don't remember <PERSON> doing any of this, so I guess I consider him a bit better than <PERSON>.", "504" ], [ "Look, this is just my own piece on it, but Ghostbusters meant a lot to a lot of people that are around my age, apparently. I had no idea is was so important to so many people, but I totally get it.\n\nThe movie from my childhood that I was obsessed with was the Road Warrior. So you can imagine how bad I started freaking out when Fury Road finally got out of production hell and started actually filming.\n\nIf they would have said \"oh yeah there is no <PERSON>, fuck you, he is a woman now\", I would have been like \"oh, well, okay. don't know why that matters but ok.\" and still went and saw it.\n\nNow, if <PERSON> came out and pulled that shit that <PERSON> did, and called me (as a viewer of movies?) a sexist pig if I didn't love whoever was cast in it, I would have never have saw it.\n\nOh yeah, speaking of Fury Road, I think they are going to have <PERSON> be the lead in the next movie, if he makes one. I couldn't be more psyched, that character earned my respect and it didn't have a goddamn thing to do with her gender.", "869" ], [ "Watching the format of this show is fucking hard because I have been spoiled on the GoT style storytelling, where they basically shoot 3 different shows at the same time (across the globe) and then intertwine it together so you get a taste of everything that is important in the story.\n\nI have watched this show from the start and I don't know where certain characters are, or if they are still alive, even. I actually forgot that <PERSON> and <PERSON> were on a supply run or whatever, when they popped up I almost forgot they even existed.\n\nCome to think of it, I don't know what happened to <PERSON>.\n\nThat is bad storytelling, seriously. Fucking unacceptable for one of the top shows in existence, what a waste.\n\nEdit: I might be losing track of characters because I have lost so much interest in the show. It is getting harder to watch and *very* hard to care about any of these people. Fear the Walking Dead, however, is much, much, much worse. They could kill everyone on that show and just start over and I don't think I would notice.", "522" ], [ "In Dubai, if you represent money or have money, you can do anything\n\nedit: i know this applies anywhere, but really, when you are in one of these odd countries where there is a literal wall between the insanely wealthy and the insanely poor, you can do ANYTHING. you can fucking kill people if you want to. seriously.\n\nyou can do *anything* in one of these countries. I am not really talking about \"showing up\" with money. I am talking about *being* money, representing it. Being a part of an important family.", "680" ], [ "I'm in the same boat.\n\nI have the means and would love to visit Dubai and NK. Of course, I won't. I don't want one more dollar than I can help going toward either place.\n\nKind of like how, when it comes up... I would love to go to the 2022 World Cup. Hell, I am sure that I know people that are still going to go, they operate on the \"you can't fix the world, bro\" viewpoint. I know I am not above anyone or anything, but I can't in my conscience support that. No fucking way.", "1004" ], [ "That makes me sad to see that. Seriously, clean, dead, or in prison.\n\nI feel like the only person that has survived over a decade in opiate use (heavy benzo as well) and has a normal career/family/friends/life/whatever \"normal\" would look like in middle America.\n\nI am so sorry life turns out the way it does for some.\n\nShit, I almost feel guilty about being \"successful\" or whatever while still maintaining a habit(s).\n\nI hope this doesn't come off as condescending, I promise I don't think I am better than anyone else, ever. I think I just got lucky.", "615" ], [ "Friend, you need to talk to your doctor, he will probably have some inside info that doctors share about what is going on with each other.\n\nThat would make sense to me. I am sure he/she would refer you right back to a different doctor incase they are closed.\n\nThese raid things happen all the time. I don't know why, but they do.\n\nAnd good job not telling the cop to go fuck himself. That must have been hard. I am raging just reading the story. Fucking asshole.", "483" ], [ "This is one of the cutest weird things that dogs do.\n\nEvery doggo ive had has done this with me.\n\nThey will make a point to get their special toy or blanket or whatever and show it to me. Sometimes place it at my feet.\n\nNow, they don't want me messing with it, they will just take it away if it looks like I want to touch it. They just want to present it to you and say \"hey, this is mine and I treasure it. look at this thing that I like\"", "996" ], [ "Here's a long, boring personal story about that job I had, if you or anyone else cares to read it.\n\nAfter I was promoted and all that I had to set-up a tech/science conference, similar to a TED talk/retreat before those were a thing. Or at least before anyone knew what the hell a TED talk was.\n\nI was way in over my head, putting in 18 hour days getting things ready. I was basically the director of the event, which my boss was credited for, but I was the guy \"on the ground\", making sure the actual tech was working flawlessly to haggling on the catering bill.\n\nRemember I am like 19 years old. This is something that a \"grown up\" should be doing.\n\nSo like months of planning then weeks of these 18 hour crazy days, and the actual event itself, I was wore out. Like, sick from exhaustion because of this work and school on top of it.\n\nIt went flawlessly til the last day, something that didn't really matter went wrong, and yeah, I was really pissed about it. I literally complained to my boss about my own mistake, if that even makes sense.\n\nHe took me aside and told me something like \"Brother, this whole thing has been amazing. And everyone that matters knows it has all been you. The money for this event - I earmarked a bonus for you, you deserve it.\" Then an hour later when everything was winding down the president of the university wanted to meet me, him and the other bigwig millionaire/billionaire types that were there(guys juiced into the system, politics, business, you name it) took my boss and me out to dinner the next day.\n\nWith some rest and a clear head, that dinner made me contacts for life. It was like a real-time version of linkedin. Actually, I have never needed a linkedin because of that dinner. I was in the club.\n\nI guess the point of my rambling boring story is that success in life really is a mix of luck and hard work. Those months and then the grueling weeks of busting my ass set me up for life, as far as professional relationships go. I got that job almost as an accident, worked my way up by being on time, being personable and friendly, taking responsibility and NEVER leaving till the job is done.\n\nI hope I don't come off as bragging or trying to pat myself on the back, I really didn't do anything special or anything that anyone else with a good work ethic wouldn't have done.\n\nI can't believe I just typed all that. I'm not exactly sure what the point even was lol", "104" ], [ "Yeah, looking back on it, that is exactly what happened.\n\nMan those guys/gals hated me though. I mean, they didn't literally hate me, just a lot of passive aggressive/resentment. To make it worse, I am a pretty simple guy, I don't do passive aggressive or \"games\" that people play.\n\nThey would leave notes in the office directed at me, complaining about something, right after I had just met with them. So I would always track them down and talk face to face. Whenever we were face to face or on the phone their mood changed completely, like a 180 degree turn from how you'd think they would be if you read their note/complaint or whatever.\n\nThey just figured the person with the highest degree or GPA or some shit should be the person at the top. I remember wanting to say \"there are other factors at play here, people!\".\n\nThis is probably a crummy comparison, but putting one of the people I worked with in the position I was in - it would be like putting the guy who designed a race car into the driver's seat.", "428" ], [ "Once again, thanks brothers and sisters of /r/the_donald for posting a story I wouldn't have ever seen otherwise. Just like the 500(almost) arrested for the sex trafficking bust in CA. These stories that have to do with the right that do not get picked up - this shit is reeeeaallly starting to piss me off. I shouldn't have to come to the Don's sub to read the link. Fucking disgraceful, this one.\n\nThis poor guy can't even exist according to the far-left's law of where a black man is supposed to be. God forbid he is a fiscal conservative, or is conservative in any way, shape, or form. This guy can't win, no matter what he does, he is fucked just for being black.\n\nThis might be wrong to say, but fuck it.\n\nThe far-left, the DNC, they want to keep hold of these minorities like they own them. That is how they treat their vote. It is the \"fuck you, you always voted for me you always will, or else you hate your own people\" demographic.\n\nWe may not agree on everything, but the stranglehold the DNC has on the black voter is shameful. Hell I am sure this guy has gotten fucking death threats.\n\nOkay I'm done ranting. Have a good morning pedes.", "303" ], [ "I wish you guys put the name of the game in the titles :(\n\nI am so out of touch with gaming nowadays, but I can tell from the sheer number of posts that hit the front page that the best videogames are:\n\n- Battlefield\n- Overwatch\n- GTAV\n\nedit: this looks like <PERSON> playing GTAV\n\nedit 2: so is this GTAV modded with a female character and is the boulder moving like that also a mod? this is on a computer right? so many questions from my dumb ass....", "368" ], [ "I'm in my early thirties.\n\nA lot of people in their thirties are pursuing their career goals, raising a family, contributing to society through volunteer work, church, or civic means.\n\nThis leaves little time for things like recording a video clip of sliding down a hill on a rock in GTAV.\n\nBut you do have time to watch a 10 second clip. And time to upvote whoever made it because you appreciate that they went thru the hassle of uploading it to Reddit, so that your 30-something year old ass can watch it.\n\nThe same thing applies to you, my friend. Visit a subreddit dedicated to something that you yourself are unfamiliar with, like /r/pussy.", "123" ], [ "If she didn't put that Christian stank on her ideas so hard, I wouldn't mind at least hearing why she wants to destroy public education.\n\nThe second I hear a politician invoke the Lord on an issue that should have absolutely nothing to do with religion, something in my brain just shuts off paying attention or giving respect to that person.\n\nKeep your fucking church bullshit away from these kids lady.\n\nEdit: Like when our vice president, <PERSON>, set force policies that led to widespread disease in his state, he was asked what the hell he was going to do about it, he said \"I'm going to pray on it\". No, fuckhead, you can pray about your kid winning state or something, this is a public health crisis and you are the governor.", "165" ], [ "Go to your bank and talk to someone that matters.\n\nThey will file a dispute immediately.\n\nThis has to accidentally happen every so often. I mean, tell them your going to lose your darn house over it.\n\nI cannot imagine a bank saying \"doesn't matter, no big deal, fuck you\". I can imagine them saying that about accidently paying for netflix 4 months in advance, not on 40k.\n\ngo to the bank, now. right now.", "319" ], [ "We truly live in an amazing country. Regardless of whether or not you hate or love these people, him being confirmed is surreal.\n\nHe was too racist to be a judge back in 1985/86, which really is impressive in itself lol. Things were different 30 years ago, he must have publicly said the n word everywhere he went.\n\n30 years later he skates into the top lawyer spot of the country.\n\nThat's like the American Dream in action. Amazing.", "614" ], [ "Look, this isn't a partisan thing, this is just the truth.\n\nIf she got a DUI and killed someone, there would absolutely be a dog and pony show to appease the masses that justice was being done. She would probably get a hefty sentence too.\n\nThen that Friday at 4:30PM her sentence would be commuted and her fines reduced.\n\nWealthy people/people in power generally do not have to pay for the same crimes that normal people do.", "314" ], [ "He lived a full life, saw more and by God did more than most people on this planet can imagine.\n\nPeople get sad when people kill themselves, but when your life comes to an end like that, I don't blame them at all.\n\nDo you want to be in a fucking hospital breathing out of tubes, not knowing who or where the hell you are for another 10 years or something?\n\nI don't blame old men for ending their life on their own terms.", "168" ], [ "That is because the War on Drugs was never meant to solve the drug problem in itself.\n\nThe War on Drugs, the more and more I read about it, has very little to do with people actually using drugs and more to do with an excuse for the government to intervene in other countries when it is in the \"interest\" of the US to do so.\n\nPeople like to say they started it so they could lock up blacks or something, but I think it it is much more sinister. It is for invading other countries without an official invasion.", "1014" ], [ "Absolutely right.\n\nAnyone that thinks the our War on Drugs has to do with the actual drugs being stopped or locking up blacks or whatever is delusional. Those are just added benefits.\n\nIt is about control. It is an excuse to get involved in other countries affairs, that is all the DEA really amounts to.\n\nDoes anyone really think that a prosperous Mexico would be good for the US?\n\nWe have the best borders that money can by - there is a quote about the US that sums up our homeland defense pretty nicely, something like this:\n\nThe US is surrounded by weak neighbors to the North and the South and fish to the West and the East.", "356" ], [ "I am probably going to fuck this up, so bare with me here.\n\nA few weeks ago a prominent white-separatist/white-nationalist/national-socialist/i have no fucking clue because i dont want to read about him - ist named <PERSON> (sp?) was sucker punched in the face at some event. I think it was the <PERSON> inaug, so a few months ago.\n\nSome liberals loved it, some hated it. It was a good chance for the right or the alphas at t_d to point out whatever they saw as hypocrisy on the left(because everyone on the left is a pussy or a hippie I guess?).\n\nBecause of all of this stupid fucking debate everyone lost sight of little old Nazi <PERSON> himself. Everyone has forgotten that the whole Nazi thing is something that should always, always be met with violence, no matter what kind of bow and tie packaging they choose to put on it nowadays = altright.", "294" ], [ "Wow, so this stupidity isn't limited to the US.\n\nI thought my quaint little school in the midwest had strict bathroom laws - yikes.\n\nI gotta say, growing up past required school age - this is one of those things that you don't fuck around with in the \"real world\". If someone has to use the restroom, there is no rule that is going to stop them. No meeting or appointment has ever been that important.", "670" ], [ "Okay, so here goes nothing.\n\nI fucking love pineapple on pizza if it is on a pizza that has a ton of toppings on it already. I got used to this because I worked at a pizza place for a few years and after a rush we would have all of these leftover ingredients, and pineapple would be one of them.\n\nSo basically we would make a supreme pizza and there would be a few slices of pineapples on it. After a while I warmed up to it and quit picking them off. I now love it. It creates an off-taste to compliment the rest of the diabetes that is on the pizza.\n\nSo there, that's my piece.", "162" ], [ "Oh, you mean to tell me the guy that has got to do whatever the fuck he wants for 70 years didn't change once he got into the whitehouse?\n\nWe are lucky he isn't running the exec. branch from a fucking yacht or something. Seriously. Nothing would surprise me with this piece of shit and his cult.\n\nWe should be thankful he is at least in the whitehouse, holding up a modicum of principle and tradition, during the regular work week.", "906" ], [ "I see that shit all over reddit.\n\nI don't know if it is potheads or people that have never been around long term opiate users or what, but fuck yes, opiate withdrawals can definitely kill you. People forget that your ave. opiate user that is withdrawing probably doesn't have an athletes body to begin with. Shit, basic w/d can causs irregular breathing and heart beat.", "615" ], [ "I hope something petty like this leads to his downfall.\n\nIt would be rather fitting of the man, to be able to steal billions of dollars in his tenure, only to get caught lying under oath for a measly (to him) $400-500k.\n\nIt wouldn't surprise me at all if something insignificant is the fuel that starts the fire, at least with this fucking guy. He is so goddamn greedy I can see him stealing the fucking rugs from the floor of the whitehouse to set up at mar a lago or some shit. lol goddamnit", "747" ], [ "Yeah it was. It is pretty blatant now, looking back on it.\n\nWhen I was a few years old in 1990ish this was my favorite movie and I never made the connection till the man ran for president last year. I think BttF part 2 was on within an hour or so of one of his absurd rallies and I yelled at my gf \"holy fucking shit <PERSON> if <PERSON>!\" and she was like \"Yeah babe that is who the character is based on\"\n\n\"oh\"", "469" ], [ "oh no.\n\nLooks like someone who gets off on hurting people has sent that to you. Someone that likes to make people feel uncomfortable. He probably stole your mail after following you home then found you on social media. These things aren't hard to do, it can happen to anyone. I have read a few things that have been very similar on the internet.\n\nCould just be a stalker but usually they seem to want some kind of approval from you, or want you to acknowledge them.", "572" ], [ "Here's a protip.\n\nKeep talking, finish whatever it was you were going to say in the same tone and volume that you were while you were talking. The person that interrupted you will stop talking and realize how much of a douche they are. It is fantastic.\n\nedit: the highest rated comment is about how this doesn't work, the girl keeps on talking over the person. lol i guess this doesn't work as well with everyone, my bad", "877" ], [ "When I was out of work, I started to sell off things that I owned before even coming close to asking for help from anyone - family, friends, the gobmint, anyone.\n\nOne of my close friends and I were having a few drinks and I don't remember how it was brought up, but an acquaintance of ours was talking shit about me because I was out of work and was at the gun range. I guess he thought I was out having fun, buying bullets (which can be *very* expensive) while I was out of work.\n\nI was shooting the gun for the last time, before I had to fuckin' hock it at a pawn shop, and I had had those bullets for like 2 years.\n\nSome people are just shitty, no matter what, and this fox news caption is the perfect example.", "527" ], [ "all that and he even looks like <PERSON>\n\n<PERSON>.\n\nWell, what he is doing isn't sexual harassment, it is sexual assault.\n\nWhoever you feel comfortable telling at your school, an ADULT that is in a position of authority (literally should be almost any adult), tell that person about it. And make sure you are as detailed as you feel you can talk about. He will be switched to a different bus, at least.\n\nedit: i want to add that I understand that you don't want to make a scene and be embarrassed, and yes it is really easy for the adults here to tell you to \"make a scene\", but if you don't stand up to this kid then it will just continue. Something has to be done. I know you hear about this all the time if you get on reddit, but things that happen in highschool, if you feel any temporary embarrassment for getting him in trouble, none of it will matter in a few years.", "716" ], [ "I never liked this family, or the people on the other gun show, Sons of Guns, I think.\n\nSons of Guns, those people looked like they would fuck you over for $100 and the family from American Guns seemed about as inauthentic as a 3 dollar bill.\n\nIt takes a certain type of person to be on a reality type show like this, and all of these people are just huge turn offs.\n\nReal gun culture is abundant on the internet though", "367" ], [ "Everyone in this thread seems to have taken one of two sides.\n\n- Fuck this guy, lol what a fucking loser. Even if he did spend the past 300 years working on this, lol fuck this guy, right?\n- He has worked for 300 years to win this and never has. It wasn't his fault that he lost and he exited the stage with grace, he is above reproach and should be heralded as a king of kings. I want to suck his cock.\n\nI think the truth is somewhere in the middle.\n\nYou can work for this shit but still have grace. Come on people.", "252" ], [ "I apologize if this comes off as a simpleton's question, I am not a PhD or a MD, just a student of psychology.\n\nHow often is it that a person has regressed to their original gender (or assigned-at-birth sex)?\n\nIt seems that today, we as a society are more open to the idea of not having our gender assigned at birth and are encouraging people to live their life how they feel they should at very early ages. I am wondering, if I may be blunt, how many people found out that living as another gender wasn't for them.\n\nI apologize if this question comes off as rude or inconsiderate to anyone that has transitioned in any way.", "390" ], [ "I hope I didn't come off in any such way --- it's just... man. Life changes in the blink of an eye. It is ridiculous to act like you should spend every day with your parents, but still, take in all of those moments you share with them and just appreciate them. Like anyone, they can both be gone tomorrow and you will wonder where all of the time has gone.\n\nlol sorry if that sounded all doom and gloomy, lol, I lost my father a couple years ago and I would give anything to have another day, another 5 minutes with the man. It isn't that we left anything unresolved, quite the opposite, it's just that you realize when their gone that they were your best friends the whole time.", "981" ], [ "I kinda figured this was going to happen as soon as they started calling Mar a Lago the \"winter Whitehouse\" or whatever.\n\nI know all presidents cost waaaaay more money than anyone notices, but this guys lifestyle and family are going to cost the taxpayer a ton more than any other president.\n\nBut none of his supporters will care.\n\nHe has broke up years of formalities and moral decisions that have been in place for years and years, like not releasing his taxes to show that he isn't taking bribes or whatever. Honestly if the <PERSON>'s passed a law tomorrow that allocated $1 million a week for his children to go shopping it wouldn't surprise me. Hell, I would be expecting something blatantly horrible like that any day now.", "915" ], [ "This is to be expected - the writing was on the wall.\n\nI don't have any idea how normal administrations \"run\" but I am sure that he has adapted it to how he ran his family business. He is probably kicking tasks to whoever he thinks can handle them while he works 20-30 hours a week making decisions. The rest of the time is him lounging around watching Fox News, yelling at the TV set like your racist, drunk uncle. This shouldn't surprise anyone that can read between the lines.", "906" ], [ "If you were ever looking for a sincere <PERSON> moment, this is one of them.\n\nHe has owned a plane and golf courses for decades - doing this is just \"oh, it's Saturday\", nothing special at all. It is the equivalent of you meeting up with some buddies at your local course.\n\nI would expect these kind of out of touch with anyone's reality moments every week.\n\nI have no idea how he became the symbol for the working man, but there ya go.", "747" ], [ "You need to start doing what I have been doing for a few months now --- whatever <PERSON> says or any of his reps say - it is the *literal* exact opposite of whatever the truth is.\n\nHe is actually really easy to follow if you just flip whatever he is saying, or whatever <PERSON> says. Just change it to whatever the opposite is and you will have your answer to almost any question that is asked of him.", "622" ], [ "I was supposed to go out with a girl last night.\n\nNo shit, I gave her a key to my place because I told her I would probably be asleep by the time she got there, passed out on the couch. I was, and woke up to a note \"you looked so tired I didn't wanna wake you\" lol\n\nim 30 and in great shape, but your body just starts slowing shit down, and I think that part of it is that you have been to every type of party situation by that age multiple times - it just doesn't hype you up anymore.", "1012" ], [ "Well, yeah, you know what you are probably right. They have been trying to get to the front page so they have probably tried the same post like 50 times.\n\nIf there is one thing I respect about t_d, it is that they at least haven't branched out into 20 different subs like the left did.\n\nYou go on /r/all and 3 out of 10 posts will be from some anti-trump sub.\n\nedit: lol I just realized it probably has to do with that fact that *he won*, so whats the point", "728" ], [ "For some reason, people that defend the season 6 finale fail to notice this.\n\nThere are people that watch this show and honestly saw no problem with how it was handled. I don't know if it is blind loyalty to the product or they aren't too bright or what.. but the way the cliffhanger was handled caused major fucking problems with this show. Problems that go beyond me and you not liking it, -- it really messed up how season 7 happened.\n\nThen there was that awful Gimple explaining to us why we were dumb for not \"getting it\" or something. gtfo with that shit\n\nedit: Oh I forgot, one of these people that defends the finale told me that I was wanting \"instant gratification\" or something, because I didn't get to see who was killed. Another said that I just wanted to see gore or something.\n\nI don't think these people understand storytelling, in the most basic sense. Whoever is responsible for that cliffhanger decision shouldn't be allowed to make any more television shows.", "522" ], [ "Wait, are you saying the episodes should be rated better or worse?\n\nSeems rather accurate, the average score. I guess.\n\nThere are lots of people voting 1 and 10, neither of which any episode that aired this season deserves. That kinda evens out each of those extreme undeserved scores.\n\nThe average of these ratings is really quite favorable. I would rate most episodes this season around a 5 or 6. The show just isn't that great anymore, sorry bro", "522" ], [ "I am from /r/all, I don't follow formula 1.\n\nBut it doesn't surprise me that this is on the frontpage. It is a popular thing that people like. I can understand your rage -- it has happened to me many times (I have been at work and turned my phone off till I got home lol) for different events on TV.\n\n*But...*\n\nYou are on the frontpage of the most popular news and pop culture aggregate on the internet, unless you count news or whatever on facebook.\n\nYou have to expect this kind of stuff and not be upset when it happens.", "633" ], [ "People on reddit are obsessed with rescue pups and kittens because of the feel goods.\n\nI'm sure some of the people that talk shit about people that buy dogs probably don't even have one.\n\nEdit: I remember a post a while back where someone bought there dog, didn't rescue it. One of the top comments was something like \"why didn't you get a rescue dog?\"\n\nI know it isn't the same, but fuck man, go up to a couple that just had a kid and ask them why they didn't just adopt one. It's the same principal.", "958" ], [ "I hooked a dog up to a running line, where the pupper could get some more area to walk around and stuff, rather than just being on a long leash in the backyard.\n\nPoor pupper ran so hard after a rabbit or something that she reached the end of the line and it jerked her whole body like 3 feet up in the air. My heart sank, I thought the dog ran so hard and hit the end of the line and it broke her neck.\n\nThank God it didn't, I took it off of her and redesigned it.", "996" ], [ "<PERSON>\n\nHey, at least be glad that his name is synonymous with rape for the rest of his life.\n\nTrying to look at the bright side here. The internet has created a virtual scarlet letter for these kind of people that get off easily. At least you can search his name and that is all that will come up. Nothing that he has done in his life, before or after, will ever matter to anyone. He is the guy that raped/tried to rape that girl. forever.", "454" ], [ "Absolutely. Reddit has some of the highest moral ground I have ever seen in my life.\n\nA lot of people here walk the path that <PERSON> did or something.\n\nedit: I was just called a piece of shit or something for rigging up a running line for my dog. RedditUser said I shouldn't be a lazy piece of shit and just go walk her.\n\nShe was on it while I was at work. Thought she would rather be outside than inside, which she did (inside is fucking boring for dogs, newsflash), and I also didn't want her to be murdered by a car. But I'm a lazy fuck.", "945" ], [ "There was a post yesterday about <PERSON> playing golf while president.\n\nI think it is running around $18,000,000.00 a month right now, all things considered. Some people were defending the man, saying that simply is how the wealthy live, and that we have to pay for it because we need someone like this in the whitehouse. It went something like that.\n\nSo yeah, even people that aren't wealthy think that they deserve shit like that", "915" ], [ "Well, that sounds spot-on for how he sounds like he would be with someone behind closed doors, in that situation.\n\nA lot of people that voted for him don't realize that he isn't this master negotiator that heads some major multinational.\n\nHe runs a real estate business he inherited from his father, that's it. There hasn't been much in <PERSON>'s last 40 years that he has done that he didn't want to do. No meetings were held in Trump tower that *he* didn't want to have.\n\nHe has ran a relatively small business that has been built on screwing people out of money. There is always a con with this fucking family, just read about them. He has no tact and probably terrible social skills, he grew up in one of the most privileged bubbles you can grow up in.\n\nWhy anyone thought he would magically change or thought that this wasn't him, and has been for decades, is beyond me.\n\nI hope that a lot of <PERSON> voters wanted the Republican party to implode or something, because this is how you get it. The man is the leader of a party that he doesn't care for or respect, and the feeling is mutual.\n\nThe GOP is ticking time bomb with this guy at the helm. In a way he could have been the best thing to happen to America in decades. Think about it.", "800" ], [ "Yes.\n\nThis.\n\nPeople keep on waiting for the impeachment process to start, for some reason. He isn't getting impeached, and he isn't going to prison or whatever other fantasy you have.\n\nI don't know what the \"reason\" will be, but he will quit. I don't know if it will be in 2 years or what --- I know he started his reelection money raising shit, but that is probably just a scam to get *more money*. It is all that this family cares about.\n\nI can totally see him not getting anything done, blaming democrats AND republicans (this is key here), then starting some Fox News internet based ripoff that is steeped in conspiracy nonsense and sensationalism news.", "554" ], [ "It is a mafia state that is ran like a big business, <PERSON> is basically a thug that runs a gas station. I think there are somewhere between 100k and 200k people that are in that group.\n\nA fun movie to watch is *Lord of War* starring the one true God, <PERSON>. It doesn't focus on this as it's central theme - but the main character is a good example of a guy that is a member of the kleptocracy there.\n\nA lot of people that had good connections and a work ethic made a *ton* of money when the union collapsed. The book that fella is recommending on here, Putin's Kleptocracy, is a good read too", "846" ], [ "I think that once someone gets away with something they think they are invincible.\n\nI read a story about a guy that married a rich woman, she died in a freak car accident.\n\nHe then married another rich woman, about ten years later. She fell off a cliff.\n\nThe police investigating it thought that something was off from the very beginning of the investigation, then found out how wife #1 died, and yeah, he fucking killed them both.\n\nThat fucking <PERSON> guy is the same way. They will probably find someone dead next to his jail cell in 10 months.", "741" ], [ "The thing that a lot of people don't understand is that dialogue does not mean character development.\n\nAnd to the people on the opposite end of the \"defending tWD scale\", a bottle episode isn't just a shitty episode. Half of the episodes *cannot* be bottle episodes -- please, quit calling them that. It is just a poorly written/produced/acted show. That's it.\n\nBut anyway, yeah, the episode where <PERSON> and <PERSON> (whose relationship is one of the most forced and awkward I have seen on a TV show) go to the place where the CGI deer was -- that added nothing.\n\nThere was no character development. Oh, <PERSON> thought that <PERSON> died for a minute and was upset about it? **She should be.** That isn't \"character development\".", "522" ], [ "Lol, no one seems to agree when the quality of the show dropped off. Everyone has their favorite/least fav. season and they rarely match up.\n\nMost people that I know irl think that the best season was the first, and I can't argue against that. I know it was only 6 episodes (wasn't it?), but fuck man, that pilot was probably one of the most intriguing starts to a TV ever made.\n\nI don't think a show's first episode had reeled me in like that before, and the only one that has came close (and maybe topped it) is the first episode of True Detective. That show is a fucking masterpiece.\n\nEdit: the thing with season one being so good is that there wasn't any time to be bad. It was six fucking episodes. There was no fluff, none. Every word was anchored in a pause of speech and even the pause of speech had meaning in it. Take that and stretch it out over, what 16 episodes is insane. I can't imagine the bullshit on GoT if they had to make the show + 6 more. On the same or less budget. It would be fucking terrible.", "60" ], [ "I have seen every episode of the show, some episodes many times, and I *think* I know who you are talking about.\n\nThat is a problem with this show. A lot of the characters aren't well written or likeable, so no one cares about their death. Their death is a pointless shock value, and who that shocks anymore I have no idea because who cares?\n\nThe sister show to this one is waaaaaaaaay worse, Fear TWD, I think most people that watch that show wouldn't notice if the entire cast was killed off and replaced in between seasons.\n\nOh yeah, and it isn't just the writing or whatever, it's the acting and the \"fit\" of the character.\n\nI'm not into <PERSON>. I'm not a comic fanboy and I don't have all of this hype built up into him. To me he is just a skinny prick that I have literally no idea why his guys are scared of him. Maybe he is a huge hulking presence in the comic, but it is laughable on the show, to me anyway.\n\nI know a lot of people think that <PERSON> is killing it, so I apologize for that opinion. Personally, I think he fucking killed it as the comedian, and he totally made that movie.", "513" ], [ "In regards to your edit, someone on this sub told me that the last two seasons of tWD was superior to the last two seasons of GoT, so take that as you will.\n\nSome people get delusional with stuff that they like, and will defend it as if they are personally attached to it, like a cult. I think that person is a good example.\n\nWith the first season of TD (and lets be honest, the only planned season), every comment about it is the same. Masterpiece.", "60" ], [ "I was so lucky to not read or pay attention to anything about this show on reddit for like 2 months.\n\nI watched the entire show in the week leading up to the finale. What a ride.\n\nI cannot believe it wasn't spoiled for me from /r/television or the westworld sub. I mustn't have been paying attention because it seemed like half of the posts on /r/all were about westworld stuff.\n\nOh, I am glad that season two won't be a jazz inspired improv performance art piece. There's going to be a story, cool. That is what made the first season good too.", "735" ], [ "I think <PERSON> will complete a few short term gains for <PERSON>'s Russia while he is office, and completely fumble most everything else.\n\nA lot of good programs that don't cost much will be gutted because of \"fiscal responsibility\". Funding that could be provided if he spend a whole week in the fucking whitehouse.\n\nBut for the most part, the damage he will do won't be lasting. It will be a stain on our country, but not like the holocaust or something.\n\nI honestly don't see him going four years, I think he will be the first president to just quit, for whatever reason.\n\nHim and his people are so goddamn incompetent, it is baffling how the whitehouse hasn't burned down yet.\n\nedit: he is also 70 or 71 years old and is severely unhealthy looking, fuck. fattest and oldest president we have had in a while. He might have to step down for health reasons. Then again, I can't imagine anything keeping him up at night, and I can't imagine him putting much work into the job.", "826" ], [ "I tried to think of a way to explain it better than this, but I can't.\n\nfrom wikipedia:\n\nRolling coal is the practice of modifying a diesel engine to increase the amount of fuel entering the engine in order to emit an under-aspirated sooty exhaust that visibly pollutes the air. It also may include the intentional removal of the particulate filter. Practitioners often additionally modify their vehicles by installing smoke switches and smoke stacks. Modifications to a vehicle to enable rolling coal may cost from $200 to $5,000.", "726" ], [ "Oh, wow, it's one of these comments.\n\nI don't see these too often on reddit, but they intrigue me like no other (when it comes to the election, this past year in the US). I am 30 and everyone that is twice my age and triple my age grew up hating Russia.\n\nThey have collectively stored up hate for decades upon decades. Growing up in the 90s, it makes no sense to me. Then maybe 5 years ago it becomes pretty apparent that Russia became on oligarchy.\n\nI start to not like Russia.\n\nThe people that grew up hating Russia start liking them.\n\nWhat in the hell happened? *Especially* in the last year, fuck man, some of these people that spent their career during the cold war want the US to be more like Russia. Is it because of the weird macho prop that <PERSON> does? They want our president riding naked on a horse or something? The fuck?", "853" ], [ "I'm not a leftie and something is obviously wrong here.\n\nThere is only one thing that truly stands out to me, above any evidence or commentary I have read.\n\n<PERSON> doesn't have a fixed ideology. He doesn't even have an interest in politics, really. He has flipped on *every* single issue he has ever had ---- except one. Russia. He has been pro-Russia from day one. It wouldn't surprise me if he said in an interview this week that he admires <PERSON> more than anyone else.\n\nI think it just about money and power. <PERSON> is probably the wealthiest man in the world, and <PERSON> knows this. <PERSON> is mega rich but not super mega ultra rich, and he wants in that club that <PERSON> is in. That is why he has so much respect for the guy. It is about the status he has and his assets.\n\nwhew thats it for now\n\nedit: and the best part is that as US president, he has more status than putin. The office has been made lesser because of his presence, and he is a laughingstock on the international stage, but he is still president.\n\nGoddamn I can't believe I am talking about a president <PERSON>. What an embarrassing time for America. What a stain on our history.", "853" ], [ "don't forget the moral high ground that a ton of reddit has\n\nI have never seen a more altruistic, moral, and ethical gathering of people in my life.\n\nThere was a post on /r/aww yesterday where a guy said the he bought a dog. People were giving him shit because he didn't just adopt some random mutt at the pound.\n\nHe paid two grand for a specific dog bought at one of the best breeders in the country, his dog lives like a king, and he still got shit for it. this website fucking sucks sometimes, people are delusional", "958" ], [ "There was a post earlier where someone brought up that a donkey was being fed and watered, but wasn't being played with.\n\nand the donkey is in a small pen, enough room to walk around in circles is all.\n\npeople were asking for doxx info on the person that had it, were wanting to call the police and multiple animal abuse groups. Like, get the guy who owned it arrested and sent to prison.\n\nGotta love the weird moral high ground people choose to take here.\n\nedit: oh yeah the OP said that he/she did infact call the police, but they called <PERSON> a fucking moron and said it wasn't animal abuse, ffs", "996" ] ]
61
[ 22740, 9777, 5831, 7844, 9248, 20594, 7659, 13014, 13630, 25018, 19027, 13681, 15707, 15561, 20109, 3450, 22325, 5370, 11570, 8502, 4892, 18012, 8135, 2394, 7687, 11983, 11978, 18197, 3414, 24933, 2799, 5874, 19162, 11317, 679, 12258, 10118, 25051, 17052, 10797, 2033, 20713, 23715, 23313, 12002, 10873, 19086, 13374, 12205, 15470, 5336, 3815, 2642, 20316, 5035, 13365, 23417, 3011, 4231, 9775, 14436, 24295, 16710, 7350, 16898, 9210, 8661, 2363, 5045, 17992, 20644, 16996, 25268, 10386, 5598, 22254, 7517, 12816, 2216, 9041, 22112, 14658, 21100, 1192, 17537, 2916, 14164, 14720, 13627, 7978, 11289, 24795, 19169, 14482, 22176, 2577, 6109, 14047, 5040, 16104, 10477, 5895, 13275, 4526, 2664, 9089, 8865, 9227, 6681, 13410, 17831, 493, 24682, 3604, 20457, 20088, 16293, 14799, 4996, 22314, 9708, 1464, 14163, 772, 24868, 19425, 4898, 12968, 17049, 17476, 21143, 2131, 2338, 4168, 1800, 8922, 9188, 10744, 2206, 2573, 20553, 2284, 10465, 14539, 2837, 10667, 681, 20007, 9677, 7111, 3939, 6012, 15603, 19332, 24141, 18421, 21556, 9958, 394, 19374, 14282, 21635, 3186, 4851, 16427, 5325, 9970, 3482, 8165, 701, 15823, 6724, 18900, 25508, 22102, 23928, 15296, 13305, 7985, 2078, 20698, 20440, 2772, 23685, 3990, 15890, 16545, 19908, 19966, 7034, 4988, 5100, 5769, 13824, 14660, 432, 18291, 19700, 18073, 20288, 11345, 10907, 468, 2992, 19941, 17482, 12607, 13299, 25242, 18379, 1488, 13129, 23388, 9431, 13797, 14178, 24320, 25394, 22567, 7485, 6005, 22134, 9476, 8914, 4039, 8908, 9361, 14494, 16549, 18964, 23490, 23577, 12827, 17226, 7280, 24686, 15315, 22725, 18661, 25067, 18600, 20001, 19679, 24335, 23159, 5804, 7347, 8794, 17700, 7123, 21033, 3633, 23054, 4226, 18732, 21562, 11186, 7257, 7674, 19849, 16197, 14411, 22810, 24807, 3692, 2019, 20106, 8122, 23408, 10766, 25130, 7226, 20024, 15504, 14691, 1593, 6438, 23188, 14351, 5947, 23199, 19945, 18393, 2408, 11077, 17757, 6662, 25507, 9539, 2144, 2663, 12470, 12308, 4129, 8216, 9672, 25362, 6648, 9028, 19899, 22140, 22510, 7609, 2444, 19582, 21036, 16012, 16916, 12500, 79, 14562, 4971, 5888, 19189, 17421, 24796, 546, 8475, 18349, 2970, 6654, 11791, 3247, 6529, 21099, 10785, 15401, 18717, 11915, 22242, 9719, 24302, 3255, 25048, 145, 5661, 976, 17217, 19906, 16152, 13012, 11496, 9753, 633, 20387, 16912, 22237, 22243, 2708, 84, 14944, 22175, 17564, 24223, 22648, 19696, 21932, 15477, 10108, 3760, 1614, 17193, 5072, 17466, 7402, 4740, 10, 22207, 24755, 20223, 2504, 7050, 18523, 8271, 13536, 3806, 15082, 11650, 4897, 372, 20484, 10640, 15403, 6685, 24486, 14341, 3904, 8919, 15563, 14748, 13928, 24776, 12119, 5068, 18673, 6237, 7810, 5971, 5046, 25514, 9885, 1765, 25265, 14124, 4170, 16382, 1757, 18061, 12990, 23767, 6277, 17759, 20363, 21460, 14526, 15061, 14255, 13464, 14067, 10497, 17465, 7575, 9392, 24513, 19720, 3753, 16565, 17592, 25312, 14006, 5178, 19658, 21894, 23291, 18072, 3009, 3429, 12785, 20376, 20070, 21138, 15813, 19234, 14053, 3454, 3091, 24275, 4214, 3054, 15383, 1596, 21220, 21875, 21350, 21582, 91, 1401, 23063, 14446, 20291, 12034, 13385, 3310, 21164, 16764, 19084, 25180, 23028, 14545, 24217, 19872, 3313, 13528, 8421, 6037, 1377, 15034, 24872, 10208, 20224, 8379, 3495, 3866, 20628, 8508, 4839, 8206, 4926, 5191, 14522, 5221, 5397, 4104, 5663, 10436, 15259, 16292, 11062, 13631 ]
reddit_dump_00100101011010
[ [ "I fucked up two really great chances the past 2 years I had with two really great women because my stupid brain.\n\nThe problem is when I dont respond for a day, that already puts the nail in the coffin. It’s really hard to come back from that let alone a week or more. The last girl I was dating basically told me never to talk to her again after I “ghosted” her for literally 22 hours, wasn’t even a full day. 😢", "1012" ], [ "Here’s the cool thing about school. Your art project doesn’t have to be good, it just has to get done. As an artist who went art school, the most liberating thing I realized early on is that your projects don’t have to represent you or your art, they should show your teacher that you learned something and did some work, that’s about it.\n\nJust make some shit, turn it in, then put the rest of your creativity into something you care about.", "889" ], [ "Honestly, just appreciate someone likes your photo and wants to use it. Make them an offer and see what they say. You definitely don’t need a contract. I think it’s safe to assume that the artist themself is inquiring? Which would also lead me to believe they are an indie artist... who probably doesn’t make too much money (yet).\n\nThe best play here would be to make friends with the artist and potentially get more work from them in the future if you’re into that. If not, just take whatever $ they are willing to give you.", "560" ], [ "How many contracts have you written up in your photographic career?\n\nThe value of this transaction doesn’t warrant a legal contract. Sure, wouldn’t hurt but it’s a waste of everyone’s time, lmao.\n\nIf someone asked me to sign a contract over one photo for an indie artist I would seriously just start to laugh.", "560" ], [ "The video is getting compressed automatically. Most likely the moment you sent those files, one of you had a poor connection so iMessages compresses the file in anticipation that the transfer may take a while at full res.\n\nDon’t send master files over iMessages. You want to maintain the integrity of your work so use Dropbox or something.", "947" ], [ "1) how is it a scam? It’s no different than trading forex or stocks (yes the assets are different but we trade them practically the same). \n\n2) it’s made for criminals? has he spoken to <PERSON> about this? lmao\n\n3) if the government could ban and stop crypto I promise you they would have already done it. unfortunately crypto can’t be just turned off.\n\nAnyways, sounds like you’re talking to a literal moron, I wouldn’t even waste my time arguing. he’s not arguing facts so the discussion is useless.", "831" ], [ "As someone who has wasted a good $5k collectively on bullshit photography gear throughout my career I can confidently say this product is one of those things you use one time and realize it’s next to useless. I don’t want anybody to waste any money on garbage. This product looks like absolute shit. And as I mentioned before, you can get this effect in post and it will probably look better than achieving it through shitty glass.", "560" ], [ "<PERSON> I took some viagra to go ham on my wife for Valentine’s Day once. When she got home from work I looted and pillaged her body with my steel rod... then she was like oh I have a surprise for you! She took me to get a couples massage immediately after... she’s kind of a funny and had scheduled a male masseuse for me. Most awkward massage of my life.", "875" ], [ "Whew she came back to work that quick? If my wife and kid died tragically I would honestly off myself. Good on her for holding it together to come back. As far as your joke goes, it’s a little bit dark humor to begin with, I don’t fault you for it. Probably something I’ve said a hundred times.", "797" ], [ "I dunno, everyone has different expectations. There is no proper amount of communication. Personally I can go days without talking to my SO and it’s really no big deal. Past relationships if I didn’t text “good morning baby I love you so much” every single fucking day I’d be in the dog house. Just talk to her, make sure you’re not overwhelming her. Maybe she really likes you taking the lead, it could be exactly what she wants. Or maybe you’re getting annoying and she doesn’t have the heart to say that, heh. Talk to her about it.", "432" ], [ "There is plenty of info showing <PERSON> working with AitherC02 since 2018, I have no reason to believe they are lying about his role as a co-founder and lead engineer... honestly that’s too high profile to be a scam, nobody would be that stupid and <PERSON> wouldn’t jeopardize his role at Apple to make a few millions dollars in a crypto scam, that wouldn’t make any sense.", "831" ], [ "Same with the “Inject Bleach” thing. What’s hilarious about that whole entire fake news is that <PERSON> was citing a study done by a legitimate company working on a device to “disinfect and sterilize internal organs with a specialized UV light” lmao nothing he said was inaccurate, of course a scientist could have articulated it better but again, he never said to inject bleach. 😂😂😂", "642" ], [ "Staking is placing your coins in a specific place to secure the network (Proof-of-stake). Usually earning transaction fees.\n\nLiquidity providing is exactly that, lending your money to a liquidity pool in return for a cut of the transaction fee profits.\n\nYield farming is taking advantage of liquidity provider bonuses usually provided in a specific token for contributing to a specific pool during a specific time. Imagine earning Uni 6 months ago...\n\nAll these lucrative possibilities are all thanks to DeFi, cutting out the middle men and banks leaves a lot of money on the table to be passed around.", "509" ], [ "There are two types of people, those that see a good thing and then take it upon themselves to learn more and those that just ignore stuff unless it’s spoon fed to them. If you spoon feed someone you’re just gonna spin your wheels for no reason. I get that she is your girlfriend but if she can’t or doesn’t want to figure out how it works, she’s never gonna get it.", "813" ], [ "When ETH was under $300 just recently. Nobody cared. Nobody praised the cheap transactions. Nobody bought.\n\nNow ETH is at ATH, gas fees are though the roof... and people are lining up around the corner to buy and trade on Uniswap.\n\nBlows my mind the way people think. Meanwhile I’m selling off my $300 ETH for $1800 and I’ll buy back at the next -50% dip.", "928" ], [ "Holding time isn’t really relevant because that’s just your exchange (most likely) giving you that data and it’s probably limited to that exchanges balance, hardly representative of the entire market.\n\nYou can view every coins stats, websites, socials, etc. on Coin Gecko or Coin market cap.", "937" ], [ "I’ve been using Ethereum for 4 years. I use it everyday. Currently working on a new dapp right now.\n\nI’m guessing this statement comes from ignorance or you simply just don’t know what a lot of these leading crypto currencies actually do and how they function?\n\nEdit: oh you’re hyping doge, that explains everything 😂", "831" ], [ "The entire life of crypto, since the inception of Bitcoin... there has been a single mantra among enthusiasts and early adopters “just wait until institutional investors arrive”. Well, they have begun to arrive. Remember last week when <PERSON> tweeted about Tesla buying $1.5b in Bitcoin? This is very different from 2017 when the biggest news was just a guy selling everything including his house for Bitcoin.", "1008" ], [ "I hate social media. I’m a freelance creative and have had a successful career for the past 15 years. I have 2000 followers as of today, half of them are bots I’m sure and the rest of random people I’ve met irl and became IG friend with. My point is that social media isn’t necessary for success and I’d argued that 99% of the “successful” instagrammers aren’t as successful as they present themselves.", "611" ], [ "I dunno but whenever I see this question I just think of my fat ugly pasty-white gross best friend who banged some of the hottest girls in high school and is now married with a beautiful (except for him) family. He is a fun guy, very nice, respectful, full of confidence in himself and that’s exactly what girls liked about him. I still think he’s dog ugly but my point is that doesn’t matter if you’re genuinely a cool person on the inside. If you have a shit personality and your ugly then I’m sorry but you’re fucked. Luckily personality can improve if you want to.", "378" ], [ "I don’t think anyone said that. I’ve been to a strip club 3 times in 30 years. You’ve got to be a certain type of person to enjoy them. Not saying there is anything wrong with it but I’m just not a fan of window shopping for something I’m not going to get. Every time I’ve been I was pretty bored and don’t see the appeal. One time at a Vegas bachelor party something happened and all the lights turned on for a few minutes. Without the low light and black lights, when I saw these women in real light I almost vomited.", "145" ], [ "I would ask specifically “are you currently neglecting mental health care and medication recommended by your doctor who has been treating you the previous decade and did you really lose a court case where you stabbed your ex in the chest and ordered to pay restitution and do you still have sex in the bathroom at work with that weird guy <PERSON> you work with”.\n\nHonestly would have been a lot easier if I had just asked that up front instead of finding out the hard way.", "483" ], [ "Lmao so crypto basically bypasses banks, crazy right? By eliminating this middle man “the banks” you eliminate a fuck ton overhead that those banks DESERVE and aren’t earning anymore (fees, interest, etc). With all this extra money being stolen from the banks pipeline it gets evenly distributed to the criminals using crypto. It’s preposterous!", "831" ], [ "Dropping random nft’s is kind of worthless and doesn’t have much value. You need to create a collection of say 100 pieces (or more) and drop intermittently. Each piece needs to be different but fit within a theme and vary in “rarity”. Create a legend to differentiate the differences and boom you have a game which incentives collectors. Unless you have a huge social following stand alone NFTs are worthless.\n\nCheck out HashMasks or PixaLyfe.", "532" ], [ "Well, luckily we’ve kind of passed this stage, but up until a few years ago there were ALOT of straight up shitcoin exchanges, _URL_0_ for example. It was obvious the coins were sketch but they still pump and dumped periodically so there was hope.\n\nWhat wasn’t obvious (to the noobs) was that the spread was wider than your moms ass. If you market bought anything you were immediately 10-100x underwater with no hope of recovery.", "1008" ], [ "Exactly. They’ve been around forever. No dedicated customer base. Their branding is horrible, marketing sucks. I’ve eaten at one once or twice, nothing memorable and when I do pass by one (very rare) I don’t take a second thought about eating there. I’ve never heard someone say “wow I could go for some cici’s right now”. All their business is location based as in people just eat there because it just happens to be there.\n\nAlong with fundamentals you want to invest in an exceptional product, I’m sorry but cici’s isn’t a valuable brand name.", "18" ], [ "Nope I know exactly what cici’s is and it’s not what I think of when I think about pizza. Look, there’s always a market for mediocrity and I’m not shocked someone would drive 2 hours for something they lack a better understanding of... but hey I’m just a random guy on the internet, go balls deep in Cici’s if you want. Ironically I’d put my money on Little Caesar’s over cici’s any day if the week.", "162" ], [ "> do you realize Bitcoin is up...\n\nFirst of all, I don’t think this is the end of crypto by any means. For you to assume that is very cute... in fact I’m so bullish on crypto, I payed enough attention to secure my profits in order to double down at the right time. All my profits are in stable coins, so that should give you a good idea of just how much I believe in crypto.\n\n > do you know why you’ll stay poor?\n\nMy dude I literally *just* spent 8 eth on a Hashmask NFT and to be quite honest I don’t care enough to respond to the rest of your diary... 😂", "1008" ], [ "I’ve been doing this for 5 years. I don’t know what to tell you, I’ve made more in crypto than I have my entire adult life working. I don’t claim to be a god here but there are definitely trends you can follow, you can read the sentiment of the market here on r/cryptocurrency, and there are plenty of other famous people on Twitter who share information inline with what I posted here 22 days ago.\n\nThe information is there it’s up to you to acknowledge it. I’ll tell you this though, Doge has always been a red herring (you can look back in history and see what I mean).", "1008" ], [ "Good question and thanks for not getting bent out of shape over this post flaired “comedy”.\n\nI 100% believe anybody who bought Bitcoin on or before today will see incredible returns in the coming years. This post is literally ment to be funny because all of us who didn’t just buy the top for the first time know how it goes (up and down but ultimately up).", "1008" ], [ "I’m not going to promote anyone specific but all you need to focus is on the major sentiment which you can read pretty clearly across Reddit, Twitter and the media. The past month has been pure greed, doge historically has always been my #1 indicator that the top is near. You can even look at micro cycles the past 2 years. When doge is being hyped, 100% chance the local top is near.", "928" ], [ "This post is comedy, when you open the actual post I made 22 days ago it’s flaired “metrics” and that was dead serious. A lot of you will just look at this meme chart and say “arghhhhhh” but if you look at the greed phase and cross reference that with the overall sentiment the past month it’s clear as day how to interpret this data.", "434" ], [ "I believe had <PERSON> not bought and tweeted $1.5b in BTC this retraction would have commenced within days of my first post.\n\nAnd yes I think this entire market and the people here are fucking funny and irrational.\n\nLook you post “doge to the moon” when it’s pumping and you get 1,000 upvotes and ultimate praise. But when you try to speak against the grain you get torn apart. Everything about this market is just funny and non sensible, I enjoy it, but it’s fucking funny.", "96" ], [ "No prob man. I’ll tell you this, in anything highly speculative, when you go against the grain and people actually get angry at you for it, you know you’re moving in the right direction.\n\nHere’s how this will play out, we’ll probably bleed out some more, panic selling might not even peak till Monday... hopefully we get some awesome CNBC headlines like “the bubble popped! Omg!” And then out of nowhere BTC is just going to start pumping the fuck up again. 100k BTC is definitely on the table within the next year.\n\nAgain, not financial advice as I’m just a stranger on the internet sharing his opinions. I’ve been wrong before and I’ll be wrong again.", "928" ], [ "Actually I just did some quick dd and I likey. I hate telegram can I just ask you, why isn’t their any liquidity on the dex’s? How was the token distributed? Who holds the locked supply?\n\nEdit: nevermind, cmc is whack. thanks bro gonna drop a few eth on this. literally looks like it’s about to 10x", "928" ], [ "I disagree, regulation needs to take place but I don’t not mean in a way to limit or hold back crypto from being adopted or used. Institutions need regulation or else they can’t do anything but hold it (legally speaking). You simply cannot transact large amounts of cryptocurrency in business domestically or internationally without creating unnecessary risk which any legitimate business would avoid for that simple fact. Listen to <PERSON> on the Pomp podcast (_URL_0_) he articulates this point 10x better than I could, but that’s a different conversation...\n\nRegarding censorship, I think creating a community driven black list is a must if we want this space to grow (healthily).", "831" ], [ "Yessss! This is a great idea! Even a simple Thumbs up or Thumbs down, tied to your ETH address to eliminate voting manipulation just to gauge the sentiment of the community on a specific pair would be a nice touch and great approach.\n\nToo many people assume that I’m suggesting complete censorship here (which I am not). Absolutely love this idea, thanks.", "831" ], [ "It’s crazy! And I bet if someone deploys a fake MOON pair, this sub would quickly be up in arms about it. Obviously nobody takes doge serious here so my example falls flat but exchange it with something more relatable then people would care. That’s the downside to human nature, if it doesn’t affect someone directly they usually just ignore it until it does. One of the major caveats we’ve got to overcome with crypto and decentralization.", "831" ], [ "Glad you asked. Uniswap is a decentralized exchange built on Ethereum so you can only swap Ethereum tokens on it. DOGE for example isn’t built on ethereum, it’s actually a completely different blockchain. Like bitcoin for example or many many others. Currently different blockchains cannot talk to or interact with eachother...\n\nAnybody can create a token on ethereum, you can create 1,000,000,000 CISTRO tokens if you wanted to. Now, just because you make your own coin doesn’t mean it will have value, especially if it doesn’t do or represent anything. That said, you could create a coin and call it whatever you want, in my example with Doge, somebody just created a token on ETH and named it DOGE then they gave themselves millions and then listed them on Uniswap.\n\nAbout $2,000,000 worth of ETH has been pooled alongside this fake doge token and put up for sale. The scammer is now selling the fake doge back to the pool he created essentially stealing peoples money.\n\nI’m not the best at articulating these things but once you understand the mechanics of Uniswap you’ll quickly realize how easy it is to run a scam like this and because of the decentralized nature of crypto, nobody can stop a scammer from doing it.", "831" ], [ "Oh ok, price is you’re only concern? Let’s talk about speculation then. I’m up 438% from my original purchase. As always I’m quick to remove my initial capital from any speculative investment as soon as I can. Cool! I’ve got my money back and had about 150k AGI left. If I needed the money I’d sell it but I’m a long term investor and bullish on AI.\n\nI also know how ICO’s work (their sole purpose is to raise capital to get an idea off the ground, developing anything isn’t cheap and requires time and money). Why would anyone be surprised that they raised money through a token sale and you know, used that money?\n\nAlso, your claims that they are “running out of AGI so they need to mint more” is pretty hilarious. You know ETH is a public ledger and there is full transparency on who owns how many tokens and where they live?\n\nObviously you have some problems you’ve been choosing to take out on this project (your comment history is pretty telling), it sounds like you’re projecting some personal problems here. But anyways, hope you’re ok! Good luck.", "831" ], [ "The cool thing about crypto is that someone (usually the developers) create these things called “websites”. It’s pretty dope, hear me out... so you go to one of these “websites” and it contains all this information, like even technical things only a rocket scientist would understand. Even better, these “websites” usually also have a very friendly front end so the average person can get a grasp of what the project is just by reading the front page! It’s so crazy you should definitely check one of them out.\n\nAlso, you should definitely learn about what you’re buying before you buy it. 😅", "831" ], [ "You’re so wrong in so many ways, I’m shocked to see upvotes. That’s proof to how little the average crypto enthusiast knows about what they are speculating on or even talking about...\n\n > “Most cryptos have a company working behind them that gives them value”\n\nDo you know what decentralization means?\n\n > “or a network behind them...”\n\nDOGE has one of the longest running chains, it is its own “network”. It’s proven itself as secure and stable aka trustworthy.\n\nYou know what I’m not even going to continue with this one... 😅\n\nEdit: and downvotes to confirm my first point. 👏👏👏", "831" ], [ "One of two ways: \n\n1) Cryptocurrency gains mass adoption. 1 Bitcoin will always be 1 Bitcoin and the value of services and good sreflect that (fiat currencies are now the unstable ones). \n\n2) Fiat currencies still exist and are used when applicable and the world adapts to a store of value that fluctuates on a wider scale. Look at real estate for example, a 10 year chart specifically. It’s wildly unstable yet we have grown accustomed to it and it’s just generally accepted that the market moves.\n\nMy point is that crypto currency isn’t necessarily unstable, it’s all relative to the asset you’re comparing it against. When you look at BTC rising, it’s rising against the US Dollar which means the dollar is losing value.", "1008" ], [ "How do we know time travel isn’t already a thing? lol\n\nSeriously though, if you were to put yourself in 1900, and told people there would be smart phones that can transmit live pictures and audio in real time anywhere around the world, any logical person would tell you that’s simply not possible let alone reasonable.\n\nAre you suggesting we’ve reached the peak of scientific knowledge? That would be a ridiculous statement to make. And if you’re from the future and know this to be fact, tell me the lotto numbers for next week. Thx.", "72" ], [ "1) No I don’t think fiat will be replaced, ever. There are cultural and political needs for local currencies (I’m by no means an anarchistic, I want governments to succeed in a healthy way) currently 100’s of currencies exist, this works.\n\n2) governments can make crypto illegal but they cannot stop it from existing, they will have to adapt and adopt regulations.\n\n3) I agree they won’t ever want to give up control but if enough people choose to use crypto, they simply won’t have a choice.", "1008" ], [ "Ah yes let me spoon feed you, my bad.\n\nETH will always be ETH, nothing gets converted to anything. ETH2 are simply shares of staked ETH in the ETH2 contract... like I said you should read and understand what you’re buying. Not trying to be rude but the way you articulated the question makes me think you’re not entirely sure what you’re doing...", "831" ], [ "Pretty weak APY. For example I just pulled 3 months of liquidity on Uniswap (API3-ETH) and made about $1400, the rate was jumping around 300-3000% within that time. \n\nThese returns are very real, it’s what happens when you eliminate a profit taking bank from the middle.\n\nEdit: the downside is the potential for impermanent losses, the fluctuations in value of the underlying asset your staking. For example you may get your 8% return on Bitcoin but if Bitcoin tanks, than those returns are negated.", "928" ], [ "Look, I’m here everyday legitimately answering questions. Sometimes they are ridiculous sometimes they are justified. I’ve asked plenty of dumb questions myself.\n\n99% percent of the time a simple visit to _URL_0_ or _URL_1_, whatever project it is... HAS ALL THE ANSWERS YOU NEED IN A VERY EASY TO DIGEST WEBSITE. 😅\n\nAnd as I mentioned in the post, there are so many great videos with visuals that will help people learn better than a half baked comment.\n\nPeople in general not just in crypto forget that google exists or the websites exist, I want to remind people that they are capable of uncovering knowledge on their own. That should be empowering.", "566" ], [ "I agree with everything you said and I’m not trying to push anybody away. All I’m saying is this:\n\nGo to the god damn website of the website you’re about to throw money at, preferably BEFORE you throw money at it. 😅😅😅\n\nI’ll bet you $500 that 90% of the people here right now haven’t even been to the crypto currency’s website that they own.\n\nLet’s get an honest show of hands here...", "831" ], [ "I go all in with whatever money I have to invest and hold. If my position drops by a significant amount, say -50% I double down on my position. Lowering your average cost will make it much easier to recover those original losses. This has worked for me insanely well of the past 5 years and although it’s similar to DCA’ing I find it to be a much better approach than arbitrarily buying at regular intervals.", "507" ], [ "I mean, all depends on your style... most suits from “suit” shops are pretty cheesy tbh. Even when fitted properly.\n\nI’d highly recommend going to Topman and trying on their suits. depending on your body type there is a good chance you will find one that fits perfectly right off the rack otherwise you’ll have to get it fitted. That said they make really cool suits that look more like <PERSON> vs. the men’s warehouse guy.", "433" ], [ "That’s what happens when you use money you can’t really afford to lose. I would suggest taking profits slowly to recoup your initial “investment” or the minute you double your money sell half and put that back in your pocket.\n\nA lot of people here are new with fresh skin in the game but there’s even more lurking around playing purely with house money... it’s an entirely different game when you’re truly and emotionally detached from your crypto funds.\n\nAs a beginner you should be focusing more long term and watching the market and learning about the ecosystem. I go months without trading or even checking my portfolio, I just browse forums like this to gauge the sentiment and check coin gecko to see how the overall market is behaving. If there’s a lot of action there is money to be made trading. If it’s slow thats time to chill and accumulate.", "507" ], [ "Probably nothing left on the top 100 that will do a 10x from here.... to be honest it’s not that hard to turn 10k into 100k, the problem is you need to spend a lot of time watching the market (years) and find the right project at the right time. When Link was around .45 cents I put about $5k in. During that time was right after the 2017/18 “crash” and it honestly took a lot of ball to throw money in at that time as the sentiment was low. Right now we’re in a bull market and everybody is making money, this doesn’t last forever. I’d suggest holding on to your cash and watching the market, when you see an opportunity (when everyone is panic selling) that’s when you want to start to make some moves.\n\nOr get really lucky.", "928" ], [ "I get your point and I’m not hating on Cardano by any means, I like it. It’s just unrealistic to think billions of dollars and 100’s of projects are just going to simply migrate over to ADA all the sudden. One project in particular I’m pretty heavy in has announce their migrating to ADA and it really an inconvenience tbh.", "662" ], [ "There are millions of users and a small fraction of them are experiencing trouble in a complicating financial space. I would argue that a lot of issues here are user error or people who just don’t understand how any of this works. The rest are legitimate problems that any financial company would experience but I think fit well under the threshold of unacceptable.\n\nAlso this is the internet, people come to complain before they even get a chance to let the company investigate.", "370" ], [ "That’s trading in general, there is a winner and a loser on every trade. That’s how it works. The key to investing is to get in EARLY. You don’t not want to be entering when the hype is going full retard. You better believe anybody holding doge before this excitement started has already sold. Those that haven’t are naive or don’t care and holding out for larger gains that may never come.\n\nGo ahead a and screenshot this with a time stamp. Within the month, Doge will fall back to its median price. The hype will fizzle out and people will forget about doge until the next cycle begins. If you really want to make money on doge specifically, wait till this happens, buy and hold.", "937" ], [ "Nah I get their point and when I first discovered crypto I let sensationalism like that get to my head. Then you level out and realize how young crypto is and for it to successfully overtake the global financial system, every single person who uses money needs to be on board. We’re just simply too far away from that. Maybe in 25 years. But now, lol, not gonna happen.", "1008" ] ]
131
[ 670, 20731, 17333, 1092, 23493, 11168, 14136, 22326, 20078, 1179, 9515, 6217, 5307, 14269, 14289, 23250, 563, 20895, 16083, 17921, 1849, 16407, 16686, 3222, 22278, 11929, 16107, 24175, 6625, 17087, 1120, 13569, 6883, 20724, 22321, 6772, 3584, 20299, 19346, 20775, 2720, 12053, 19993, 6603, 13048, 518, 11734, 261, 6238, 5562, 9846, 14144, 2996, 5061, 7765, 18267, 12900, 24336, 15727, 5923, 202, 2126, 21482, 10057, 8310, 16062, 10532, 11549, 13090, 8186, 19709, 11881, 14137, 3215, 3733, 5696, 16070, 1376, 12785, 11042, 13345, 20727, 9294, 14559, 13478, 21302, 3280, 3596, 2889, 15851, 1877, 1402, 24584, 4788, 14560, 4071, 15976, 2264, 8028, 18570, 12656, 723, 13873, 3581, 6313, 12952, 14464, 16646, 9859, 12644, 23847, 2728, 7818, 17485, 4574, 12905, 7553, 2721, 5862, 12426, 5189, 9275, 12875, 3375, 11408, 14920, 9771, 2311, 20725, 12340, 17668, 10982, 14293, 18730, 1027, 23554, 14618, 18363, 4987, 15767, 8051, 12633, 6489, 22192, 25395, 3598, 23397, 9673, 235, 17043, 1638, 5597, 13702, 6346, 19661, 23436, 7133, 2327, 21669, 21401, 9032, 23034, 12358, 19344, 12606, 14324, 23713, 7059, 25065, 24455, 6121, 7491, 17607, 10246, 22132, 4086, 13104, 1470, 14246, 8156, 6310, 1160, 11683, 6618, 21690, 8689, 1715, 3026, 4515, 8866, 17474, 5315, 21063, 12134, 6085, 19710, 21785, 14373, 10993, 6014, 11112, 22727, 21739, 16542, 5953, 20447, 10332, 6323, 16516, 15548, 15806, 18635, 15221, 1548, 19986, 5089, 9064, 2547, 2396, 23010, 19094, 14273, 17685, 12823, 1082, 20736, 9463, 11305, 16951, 21408, 1251, 18680, 14916, 10037, 3965, 21478, 6269, 18702, 8363, 606, 8898, 11830, 22949, 9931, 24259, 8496, 22997, 2873, 12904, 9413, 12641, 14588, 23151, 14155, 3292, 16662, 6608, 5104, 24425, 7582, 12980, 14653, 18245, 15399, 18923, 809, 21928, 24084, 24562, 14994, 349, 7878, 8644, 18984, 14981, 14912, 2852, 3225, 12840, 22065, 11832, 23400, 17500, 9087, 7415, 1671, 8320, 16225, 14552, 19172, 9060, 17628, 17951, 13912, 21914, 4017, 5762, 6518, 13030, 4525, 494, 16934, 8412, 19416, 16952, 22463, 16694, 21905, 461, 16066, 377, 22882, 18858, 4423, 7472, 9152, 16972, 288, 23212, 18243, 2804, 2075, 189, 16104, 21236, 24154, 21997, 14654, 13721, 3038, 8007, 18253, 1837, 4766, 8563, 19867, 14397, 11217, 24714, 858, 17884, 5043, 14025, 4440, 22662, 1334, 17611, 24395, 2198, 25422, 6762, 1829, 14943, 7112, 17625, 19570, 24687, 13220, 12330, 7874, 6254, 20396, 15987, 16825, 4863, 10680, 20186, 15855, 25265, 11354, 8616, 25393, 17644, 17402, 17569, 3921, 24204, 7145, 22490, 10081, 16728, 586, 9696, 11339, 19594, 19238, 21313, 9377, 11193, 21655, 2286, 6760, 4117, 11638, 16534, 13015, 13737, 7590, 22790, 8849, 21386, 119, 21498, 19387, 24512, 6302, 15338, 4923, 6376, 18525, 12596, 9081, 17617, 13325, 18105, 13040, 7537, 4092, 12998, 5501, 16827, 20304, 415, 3383, 632, 8490, 4871, 4855, 7431, 15096, 17515, 22810, 1005, 7587, 12138, 2461, 18967, 10331, 14818, 17660, 5823, 3505, 3981, 3803, 23415, 23175, 14103, 12397, 753, 20243, 2755, 11284, 17464, 10375, 21522, 53, 1439, 3662, 2307, 3510, 4914, 23494, 22432, 7494, 21781, 23125, 7919, 23159, 9677, 11931, 21429, 15071, 464, 7597, 12532, 6946, 10099, 15048, 16655, 6799, 10553, 5193, 17894, 2473, 10696, 566, 1527, 4899, 196, 18065, 815, 11902, 8303, 20485, 20291, 7418, 18727, 24261, 17942 ]
reddit_dump_001235
[ [ "That's really because the definition of mass shooting is so terrible. If a guy murders his family, that's a mass shooting. Just like any other murder, most mass shooting aren't random. Most of the time the murderer is targeting a group of people and going on a rampage to kill that specific group (a wife, her boyfriend, the inlaws) for example. \n\nReally, I'm not saying that I even really think anyone should be taking guns away or that getting a particular type of gun off the streets might work. In general, we have to stop fetishizing these guns because the guys who think they are going to storm in and kill a bunch of people to start some revolution are choosing ARs as part of their delusion. \n\nThe real solution is to be more strict on who can buy any gun. This shouldn't impact 90% of the people who are buying weapons, but there's a strong argument that our policy is failing 40,000 times a year based on the numbers. We're never going to get 100% stop to gun crime unless guns magically disappear (they won't), so we should be looking at commonality for who should not get a gun. For example, if we knew that 95% of the time, a person bought a gun and committed a murder the same day, then we might say that you can't buy a gun on the same day you pay for it. \n\nWe need to really start looking at what makes a gun crime happen and then collect actual data about how we can reduce it.", "701" ], [ "That's a perfect example of a correlation is causation fallacy.\n\nYou're assuming that the *reason* gun crime is lower is that there are looser gun laws, when in fact, the reason there are looser gun laws is because those states aren't having to implement guidelines to try to control the gun crime problem. \n\nChicago, California, New York, and other areas already had gun violence problems, so they passed legislation to try to control the problem. (We can agree all day about how crazy that is to think that passing legislation in one area would fix it.) \n\nThe NRA (and other pro-gun groups) then look at those areas and say \"See! They have gun laws and have a gun problem, so gun control doesn't work.\" You would really need to assess the people who are using guns and understand where they bought it, when, how they got around the law or if the law had an impact, but correlation is not causation.\n\nBTW: I'm not out here thinking that banning all guns is a solution. What I am saying is that with 40,000 gun deaths a year, we've clearly not got it right.", "701" ], [ "You are not understanding here. Correlation is not causation.\n\nIf you have a road with a speed limit of 70 and there are a bunch of accidents, so you decrease the speed limit to 50, then a bunch of accidents still happen, would you point to that stretch of road and say \"See! The 50 MPH caused more accidents, so we should just abandon speed limit rules altogether.\" ?\n\nCRiminaLS WilL STiLl BrEAk thE LaW is an incredibly poor argument. In that case, why make a law in the first place? Let's make no laws because people won't follow them anyway.", "38" ], [ "Great. Just what the internet was missing was another porn site. How did you think of this unique niche of vast open market that no one considered? \n\nAll joking aside: \n\nYou need to add how your rankings go, and then have a user rating vs a pro rating or whatever like Rotten Tomatoes. \n\nAlso, IMDB of porn stars would be good. How are you sourcing your content? You could probably get porn studios to give you content in order to drive their traffic.", "518" ], [ "That space isn't empty. If it were empty and could be filled, it would be filled with cargo. There is an inner hull and an outer hull. It's probably within consideration for how they can do it, but all of us can just speculate about it unless we had highly-detailed information about what's on the boat, where, what the options are to unload it, strengthen it, move it, etc. It's probably going to be quicker to dredge around it and nudge it back into the channel.", "485" ], [ "Open source and Linux contributors. Not big names like <PERSON> and everyone like that, but little guys who develop small applications and open source tools.\n\nMost of the backend of huge companies uses these tools and libraries hobbyists and engineers built for free to accomplish some goal then published because it might be useful to others. \n\nFor example, while lots of companies run RedHat Linux or some similar distro for their servers, lots of the applications installed on them were developed for free. I work at a Fortune 500 company and the number of tools we use that are just some quick thing built for a one-off and then published to GitHub or thrown out there on the web is probably 1/2 of all the stuff we use.\n\nI have a friend who dug into a bug he found in one of these tools and then tracked down the developer. The guy made it in a weekend because he needed a tool that would tell him which processes were touching /tmp/. My coworker then sent him a bug report and the guy patched it and released an update over the weekend! \n\nThat type of work is largely unseen by the non-tech community who thinks Google, Apple, Tesla, and even NASA just build their own technology without relying on the open source community.", "684" ], [ "They always show some shady meetup where there are pounds of drugs in backrooms with body guards and shit. Bonus points if they are black or Mexican or also the stereotypical prison gang out of prison trope. They don't show you four college students who meet the cook of a local diner between his shifts so they can pick up a pound of Northern Lights and a QP of coke to sell to the other kids on campus. \n\nThey then show a bunch of naked women in some trap house breaking this down and bagging it up, not some guy named <PERSON> and his girlfriend <PERSON> smoking out of a bong in their off-campus rental house while he makes kief butter so she can sell brownies to her friends for $30 bucks a pop.\n\nThey also show a bunch of coked-up people going to shootouts and shit, but they fail to show <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON> picking up some Adderal from <PERSON>'s boyfriend and snorting it before they take their exams and then not fucking their lives up.", "367" ], [ "About 2 years before my divorce, this girl I had been pretty much in love with before came out of the woodwork and started talking to me. I felt like it was dangerous and would lead to me having an affair, so I told her I wasn't ever going to be interested as I was happily married.\n\nFast forward a few years and my then wife (now ex-wife) was having an affair that started around the same time. When I found out, I called the other girl and said I was wrong about it...she told me that I missed my chance. \n\nI'm not naive enough to think there is \"the one,\" but I really wonder what would have happened had I dated her. How different things might have been.", "585" ], [ "I get the random arm squeezes from men and women alike. The belly pat, but the most egregious was when a group of women at a business trip asked me to turn around because they wanted to \"see how my pants fit.\" One of the other managers actually said he felt like he needed to intervene. \n\nI'm not going to sit here and lie and say I hate it. I fucking love being about 40 and fucking women from 19-50, but I also know that if the shoe were on the other foot and a group of guys said they wanted to see a girl turn around so they could see her butt, those guys would go straight to HR.", "139" ], [ "Post anything suggesting that the US might have a problem with guns. \n\nAs a bonus you'll get replies from the gun nutters about how 40,000 deaths a year is a small price to pay, \"ItS iN tHA ConSTItutiON,\" and making guns illegal just means only criminals will have them. Well gee, by that logic then we shouldn't make any laws because criminals will just ignore them anyway.", "701" ], [ "Also because taking that away from women means a woman could be in a situation where she is legally required (or forced) to carry a baby to term and/or forced to get an abortion. While I don't think abortion is a choice women should make, taking that choice away from them and letting other people outside violates their body autonomy.\n\nIt also causes other problems. In the 1950s all of the stillbirths and miscarriages had to be investigated to ensure they weren't abortions and many women were jailed for having a miscarriage or losing the baby even though it was natural if a doctor thought it was an abortion. Read *A Case of Need* for more information.", "992" ], [ "You can setup a porn site then call a bunch of really naive girls who are 18-19 that you will pay them $1000 a video (more than they've seen at most any job they could get at that age) then you can tape them fucking guys in a bunch of scenes they will most certainly regret, sell it, and point to the fact that they are \"adults\" who signed documents saying they agreed that this was legitimate. \n\nMoney all day and certainly something that will make you a bad guy.", "518" ], [ "They said dealers. And yeah. That's my point. The biggest coke dealers aren't some shady ass guy selling $15 crack rocks on the corner. It's <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON> who are 21 and driving the $90,000 SUV their dad bought them and have a few hundred spare dollars a week to spend on coke. \n\nThe biggest coke head I knew had a $3500 monthly allowance from her dad at University of Alabama. She had a fucking C-Class AMG and we figured at one point that at least 30 of us had fucked her in the same semester. Some people really hate that life of luxury.\n\nThe college guys I'm talking about had their house raided by the DEA at one point. They had everything in safes per their lawyer's advice, and since literally everything was locked in safes and the warrant specified the house but not the safe, the cops had to get a second warrant for the safes. In the mean time, the guys had time to call their lawyers and stuff. It was a big deal at the time, but none of them even got more than a night in jail and they never got charged with anything (to my knowledge).", "527" ], [ "Thank you! I'm going to add that by European standards, AOC is moderate. <PERSON> is a moderate left. Even Europe's crazy right-wing conservatives aren't screaming to dismantle their healthcare systems (in general, although some do want reforms) and they aren't foaming at the mouth to put guns in the hands of every citizen. On the contrary, our farthest left people are still in support of the 2nd amendment (mostly) and even <PERSON> doesn't want universal healthcare.", "886" ], [ "I thought the same thing, but then around 4th grade the other kids will get phones and your kids will be out of the social loop and then by 5th or 6th grade, the teachers are assigning work on phones and involving them in classwork. Many of the in-class assignments my kids do have QR codes that they use to launch quizzes and for the local middle school a relatively modern phone is required school supplies. (Of course if you can't afford one the school will provide you with a rental like they do with laptops and iPads.)\n\nThere is also some social stigma against having rental electronics if you can help it and I grew up as \"the poor kid.\" I wouldn't wish that on my kids.", "3" ] ]
5
[ 15401, 20460, 7629, 12136, 6277, 11180, 10658, 13348, 18061, 18749, 24313, 18393, 12038, 5068, 9248, 8764, 2137, 9361, 24314, 18914, 19234, 25124, 24093, 12977, 20132, 5572, 19945, 13238, 14947, 24948, 8858, 8619, 7908, 2393, 13904, 1778, 17757, 14181, 20330, 4933, 22217, 2300, 12691, 4875, 8994, 14949, 844, 21005, 339, 11837, 5129, 2362, 14352, 1967, 5040, 16411, 13059, 499, 25265, 21156, 24260, 13453, 20392, 61, 18738, 4163, 22112, 4926, 1499, 13698, 8108, 22677, 25268, 18477, 11398, 16256, 12072, 5076, 10785, 9110, 16569, 22411, 18687, 3141, 12877, 16286, 5411, 18523, 18778, 9775, 1367, 15642, 18272, 22814, 18379, 25051, 3729, 17466, 11551, 23124, 23977, 12034, 20976, 11456, 11169, 12949, 13851, 10744, 16845, 19429, 19312, 8661, 2992, 15847, 5769, 8732, 24868, 8794, 24885, 25166, 17675, 2633, 9450, 20316, 9599, 15823, 19834, 13778, 13687, 7050, 10806, 20882, 23826, 4568, 15413, 7461, 18600, 5045, 23072, 17193, 20603, 21884, 18031, 1884, 367, 441, 24686, 3009, 22419, 19849, 20927, 17111, 19213, 2832, 21617, 16475, 2148, 2916, 10786, 2403, 23764, 4352, 2512, 22153, 22567, 15363, 24788, 16584, 19425, 15062, 6987, 6723, 17639, 11831, 14053, 11412, 6026, 2144, 18421, 11864, 12920, 18651, 23820, 15006, 6256, 1881, 22237, 6272, 18884, 514, 2573, 10467, 1678, 21556, 21038, 10325, 16015, 25130, 24870, 23408, 18090, 17739, 4612, 22696, 21606, 13179, 3849, 19679, 4844, 18831, 5162, 334, 21829, 24503, 16447, 23356, 12090, 22816, 22574, 2570, 15254, 25117, 9968, 6555, 23163, 752, 18718, 7677, 12258, 18215, 4542, 25348, 9777, 1012, 11692, 9419, 10868, 14518, 17207, 6877, 7645, 19424, 4876, 20970, 20823, 15885, 14201, 14821, 15455, 1670, 19254, 20801, 792, 19223, 2033, 17831, 23593, 11052, 20628, 5336, 1507, 21120, 19329, 19433, 12626, 24547, 14691, 13908, 21460, 17465, 2089, 23579, 1254, 6850, 22589, 5500, 20581, 6734, 22366, 23071, 2912, 22565, 575, 10483, 12990, 19567, 4707, 11289, 16387, 17847, 10063, 12937, 4665, 19095, 19872, 22079, 11537, 19165, 7516, 2053, 8795, 2105, 11723, 25364, 17621, 2647, 16679, 13739, 10640, 14099, 3809, 10907, 14597, 21043, 17773, 16936, 5329, 5370, 19610, 16540, 6335, 10102, 15688, 1238, 8751, 22086, 5804, 24693, 3638, 13666, 23388, 10208, 11317, 10977, 2040, 22886, 8817, 10766, 21744, 10712, 8493, 18002, 184, 12215, 6587, 7674, 6408, 8980, 18983, 13534, 7543, 19441, 11141, 11555, 15670, 13094, 3760, 11133, 2303, 9803, 21183, 23216, 22402, 13299, 6961, 20794, 5952, 9501, 11059, 8590, 22867, 18196, 12002, 4312, 21229, 22082, 6824, 14655, 12894, 15653, 16744, 12793, 6037, 9389, 24311, 13630, 3347, 24192, 23339, 22519, 15425, 23895, 5471, 15429, 18387, 18182, 22973, 24795, 20001, 12725, 11016, 15561, 1757, 16152, 24364, 16523, 17340, 25508, 17599, 2918, 14429, 15615, 10797, 23767, 10151, 5018, 13581, 24694, 11942, 18807, 4039, 16471, 9919, 19526, 13082, 10613, 18346, 21099, 4596, 21291, 6653, 12646, 18966, 6137, 13822, 4405, 598, 19126, 15591, 9539, 23526, 14791, 9180, 22334, 1223, 1192, 14579, 19592, 20617, 17331, 13945, 2782, 17497, 8773, 14948, 11754, 23291, 12931, 24783, 18301, 22176, 6397, 23041, 22604, 9461, 4097, 23188, 7402, 22749, 22050, 20331, 23685, 5288, 13086, 21317, 10996, 4850, 1477, 16811, 20118, 9194, 8181, 8067, 4020, 18692, 8948, 20008, 1596, 14164, 21033, 20836, 8509, 15175, 18438, 5831, 25066, 16806, 23867, 22945 ]
reddit_dump_007brendan
[ [ "It's actually not that useful. \n\nLaw (in the US at least) is mostly about learning and understanding previous legal court rulings, which inform further rulings in common law, and can be used as arguments in future cases.\n\nThe legislative branch has no use for common law. They write statutory law. They don't even have to be particularly familiar with *existing statuatory law*; legal clerks can deal with that. The purpose of legislating law is to make ethical, moral, economic, and social decisions and using statutory law is only one way to do that. \n\nLawyers don't have a monopoly on making good ethical and moral decisions. In fact, being a Lawyer is probably a hindrance to those ends.", "812" ], [ "That's an odd opinion. I feel like standard is way more powerful than it used to be. Just because they don't print certain modern staples doesn't make them less powerful. A lot of the modern cards you listed were in standard relatively recently and weren't super powerful or oppressive in standard. Cards are more powerful in modern because the mana is better and faster and you have more degenerate combos.", "535" ], [ "It doesn't really matter as long as they're good cards and the magic player base is growing. The real thing that drives prices is a growing player base. When the player base shrinks, people sell off their collections, so you have higher supply and lower demand. Magic formats aren't going to grow if they continually get more expensive because there is a static supply of cards (ie. modern and legacy).", "471" ], [ "They should have kept the shorter standard rotation. Their justification was reduced FNM and tournament attendance, but that was because everyone was sick of CoCo and BFZ was an absolutely abysmal set with no value unless you pulled a Gideon. Now we're going to be stuck with the same stale metas for months at a time, punctuated with surprise bannings, which are much worse than simply letting cards rotate out sooner. Also, bring back block constructed.", "535" ], [ "> You clearly have little to no idea of how statutory and common law interact\n\nStatutory law overrides common law (so long as its constitutional).\n\n > claiming that the legislature has no use for common law is one of the most ignorant things I've ever heard\n\nSee the previous statement. The legislature can pass whatever law they want. They're not beholden to case or common law.\n\n > you certainly don't sound qualified to actually speak on the matter\n\nSpoken just like a lawyer that thinks they are uniquely qualified to be a legislator and politician.", "699" ], [ "Because any idiot can essentially get unlimited loans to attend college in the US. There's a big push to get every high school graduate into 4-year universities, and all those students are driving up the price. A lot of those kids probably shouldn't be there and end up spending tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars on relatively worthless liberal arts degrees.\n\nIf you have good grades and good test scores, you can go to college for much, much less. One of the good things about having every <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON> pay exorbitant amounts for Communications classes is that it allows colleges to offer more scholarships to Science and Engineering students.", "108" ], [ "Yeah, but draw-go in standard never really works out that way. For 2-3 mana, you can blank any 4+ mana spell. Sure, there is a timing restriction, but it's not like your opponent is just going to stop casting cards.\n\nI mean, at least wizards started adding virtually uncounterable on-cast triggers to the 6+ mana cards, otherwise they'd be completely unplayable in a world full of cheap counters. Especially when you have a bunch of value instant draw spells and flash creatures.", "535" ], [ "Let's be real. An ambassadorship has always been a cushy position that gets offered to political allies. It's not like our ambassadors have been negotiating any important treaties or peace deals. They've been sitting on their thumbs for 8 years while the EU falls apart, Russia and the Baltic states attack each other, Arab nations have wars and revolutions, South American countries economically destroy themselves, and so on and so on. The only diplomatic relations that have really improved are Cuba, **where we don't even have an ambassador**, or at least didn't until recently.\n\nI think America will be A.O.K. without a few more good-for-nothing bureaucrats.", "124" ], [ "Capping tuition is just setting an arbitrary number. What should the correct cap be? It probably wouldn't have much effect. Some of the US loans have 10/15-year forgiveness, but that's not really much better, because the taxpayers are basically just eating that cost.\n\n > and not worry too much about the financial side of things\n\nBut they should be considering the financial side of things. Maybe a $200k degree from harvard, or a $50k degree from a state university aren't really worth it. Just having people with college degrees isn't the end goal. The end goal is to actually produce more highly skilled and productive people. I'm not so sure a lot of college students are getting that out of college these days.", "108" ], [ "Super glue works at a chemical level. With rubbers and plastics, the two surfaces actually dissolve and physically fuse together. It also makes the fused surfaces more brittle. Paint and drywall probably don't work as well with superglue. Paint isn't really a stable surface and superglue would act somewhat like a paint thinner since it's such a volatile liquid. Drywall is too porous to work especially well with superglue, so you'd have to apply more than normal to get it to work, which means more of the wire insulation will dissolve, leading to greater chances of shorts.", "761" ], [ "Seems somewhat antithetical to the purpose of 60% keyboards. All the 60% keyboards I've used attempt to keep your fingers as close to the home rows at all times by moving all the secondary keys -- Insert, Delete, arrow keys, F-keys, etc. -- onto the primary keys through the use of function modifier keys to double or triple of the action of a particular key.\n\nFor example, my IJKL keys are function mapped as the arrow keys. You could function map that section -- UIO JKL M./ -- to be a number pad and still keep a regular keyset. After looking at your post, I might actually try that new mapping to see how it works, since I much prefer numpad numbers to the number keys.", "89" ], [ "Yeah, I think this has a lot to do with it. Liberal posts and movements are often about \"fighting for some cause\" using the federal government as the primary resource and organization. Conservatives fight for many of the same causes -- cancer research, poverty, illness -- they just do it through churches and private organizations, many of which have their own local network that doesn't really overlap with reddit.", "348" ], [ "Academia is leftist because their industry and livelihood depends on heavy government funding. Also, choosing academia over some other more lucrative career is a clear philosophical and self-satisfying life choice. There are plenty of people that are intelligent enough to be professors, but choose a career in finance, or engineering, or medicine, or any number of other fields, because it is an objectively better decision from a financial standpoint.", "285" ], [ "There is a difference between corruption and ethics violations. \"Corruption\" would generally be considered illegal. The FBI would investigate accusations of corruption and illegal activity. Ethics violations aren't necessarily against the law. A lot of the ethics violations are just based on rules that congress has set for themselves, like reporting certain types of income, or not receiving payment for another career while in office.", "314" ], [ "How so? Ironically, GDP per capita of Denmark, which skyrocketed after 9/11 to higher than the US, has been stagnate for much of the past decade and fell by over 15% last year. The GDP per capita numbers are a bit inflated though, because Denmark has had a steadily declining fertility rate for over 20 years.\n\nIt's so bad, in fact, that Denmark has an ad campaign called \"Do It For Denmark\" that is [trying](_URL_2_) to [encourage](_URL_1_) and [guilt](_URL_0_) younger people into having more kids by going on vacation and having lots of sex.", "841" ], [ "Yeah, I tried a similar deck. You definitely need more 0-1 mana sacrifice outlets, since you need to be stealing and sacrificing by turn 3 and 4 consistently or else you'll just get run over by the creature decks you're trying to prey on, and decks like GB will be too big on turn 5/6 for wrangle to work anymore.\n\nAlso, you need to be getting ahead on board in terms of creatures. Sacrificing is removal, but there's already lots of efficient removal in the format. There were definitely games where I was hitting all my draws, but eventually, even if I was sacrificing all their creatures, eventually I would run out of gas, and they would be able to kill my 1-2 creatures. I felt like the only games I was winning was able to hit for 5-6 a turn and win by turn 6 or so.\n\nI tried variations of 3/4 color builds. Syndicate trafficker and defiant salvager are other 0-mana outlets. I tried adding hidden stockpile for value, but a lot of times it just felt there was never a good time to cast it. I tried a build with Catacomb sifter, and that actually worked pretty well to keep hitting Threaten effects or sacrifice outlets when I needed them.", "344" ], [ "Lunar Force is a bad card, you're better off just playing more Void Shatters or Spell Shrivel, or Horribly Awry if you want more counter effects. I guess if you're plan is to play a lunar force and then tap out the next turn for an Eldrazi as a way to dodge sorcery-speed removal, it makes sense, but that is such a narrow situation and it still seems like a bad card in most every other situation.\n\nWith 24 lands and no ramp or mana cheating, you will likely never be able to cast Ulamog. You could maybe run an [[Oblivion Sower]] as a way to ramp you into it but still have a body on the board.\n\nTutor effects aren't really good unless you can combo off and win within a turn, or your deck is filled with a bunch of one-of utility cards. Even then, you probably don't want to pay 4 mana for it. You're better off switching those out for card draw if you want that effect, especially since there is a lot of blue card draw at instant speed.", "535" ], [ "Yeah, you really need the Dynavolt triggers to make them good. I could maybe see a similar idea for a deck with [[Paradox Engine]] or/or [[Panharmonicon]] and [[Consulate Turret]]. I think you would need a [[Whirler Virtuoso]] as an alternate energy sink, and also for the ETB energy triggers.\n\nThe general idea is to get ETB energy creatures and try to build up energy that way and the turret them to death while clogging up the board or just getting in for 2-3 damage a turn via combat.", "128" ], [ "IMO, if *playing magic* and *brewing decks* are your favorite parts of magic, you should absolutely be playing MTGO. Cards are considerably cheaper and the loss margins on selling a deck to buy another one are *way, way lower*, like 5-10%. With the creation of magic leagues, its way more convenient to play a bunch of games instead of having to wait for the entire round to end. The competition is usually much better than you would see at a normal FNM as well.\n\nBasically, when it comes to buying decks, you get more for your money on magic online. The downsides are that the MTGO meta can be substantially different than the paper meta, and you don't get the actual experience of holding the cards and seeing your opponent. But I enjoy MTGO a lot.", "344" ], [ "[[Pacification Array]] in limited\n\nReally this could be said for any cheap, repeatable \"tapper\" effect. It's great in control because it slows down your opponent until you can cast your finishers. In aggro, it taps down their best blockers so you can get through for damage, including being able to tap one creature on their end step and one on your step to get in for a giant alpha strike.\n\nThe card just seems okay, but I've played games where it basically just won me the game.", "535" ], [ "None of the control decks really want to ever tap out. Plus, Summonings is only good if your opponent can't remove the thing it's enchanting, so if it's good at all, it would really only be good in game 1, where there's a possibility your opponent didn't maindeck artifact removal.\n\nWhat targets would there be?\n\n### Dynavolt Tower\n\nIt doesn't synergize with the Tower, and if you have to tap out and they remove your tower (there's a good deal of artifact removal) or it gets countered, you just wasted 5 mana, and you are shields down for a turn. The alternate win condition is mostly meaningless here. In most cases, you're better off just leaving up mana for removal and card draw, both of which synergize with the Tower. The Tower is your win condition, better off protecting it than trying to \"win more\"\n\n### Torrential Gearhulk\n\nAgain, it's good if it survives, but given that nearly all the top decks play removal, and control decks don't have many targets for that removal, there's a good chance that your opponent is holding a fistful of exile, destroy, and sacrifice effects. Torrential is your win condition, if it dies, you die. Better to protect it than trying to \"win more\"\n\n### Clues\n\nFun idea. Gets some card advantage. The alternate win condition is a possibility. But most of the clue control decks are pretty janky and the Tower is a better card IMO.", "344" ], [ "It hasn't dropped substantially since the meta shifted about a month ago. It spiked after the Pro Tour when it did well, and then came back down once everyone realized that Saheeli was good again and that Mardu was just a better version of most of the BG decks.\n\nThe price is roughly were it was a few weeks ago, but it's likely going to keep dropping a bit because most of the good BG decks are energy based and have no use for the Flayer. \n\nThe price is also dropping (like the price of pretty much all the cards in standard) because of MM17. People are selling off the stuff they don't use so they can spend more on the new Modern cards.", "471" ], [ "Not if it's a significant reprinting enough to bring the prices to reasonable levels. There's a price point above which many players would consider buying a proxy and trying to pass it off as real in tournaments. What price point is that? $50? $100? $1000? It's different for everyone, but there's a price point where 99% of the magic community is going to choose to buy authentic cards. So all you have to do is find that price point (I'm guessing like $75-$100), and print enough cards to keep them below that threshold and proxies become a non-issue.", "471" ], [ "That sounds like complete BS. The *only* format Wizards really supports is Standard. They even say so. The bans. The Pro Tour. The rotation change. The block cadence change. These are major changes that were all done with only Standard in mind.\n\nIt seems a bit of a cop out for <PERSON> to say \"Oh, I'm just the design guy, I don't concern myself with competitive play\". The fuck he doesn't. How can you design a game without thinking about how players are going to compete with each other in that game? \n\nBasically, he's not allowed to say anything about upcoming sets, so he doesn't. He should just say he can't give any spoilers instead of making excuses about only being the \"Design Guy\".", "508" ], [ "True, but the number of cards that derive most of their value as collectibles is pretty limited IMO (basically a small portion of the reserved list and a few other early cards). I don't think collectors are generally what is driving the demand for proxies/fakes, it's mostly players who need the cards for their decks. A lot of players don't necessarily care what edition a card was printed in, so long as they can play it. Any card that derives most of it's value for it's collector status likely won't be effected much by proxies or reprintings. If Wizards decided to start reprinting Black Lotuses as masterpieces, I don't think it would really affect the price of Alpha Lotuses that much.\n\nPlus, it's much more difficult to sell fakes/proxies to collectors than it is to the average Modern/Legacy/EDH player that just wants the card for their deck. I'm sure if fakes/proxies got better, collectors would find a way to better track and legitimize all the real cards.", "471" ], [ "I upgraded to wireless AC for my main gaming machine, and it's essentially a gigibit connection. Transfer speeds are indistinguishable from wired. I mean, it probably won't work well in a 100 year old brick house, but for me it works well.\n\nGigabit has been around a while. The limiting factor for most people is their WAN speed, which is slowly increasing. Home gigabit has been around for a while and there's really not a lot of pressure to make it faster. Commercial 10gib has been around about as long, but you don't really see it being marketed for home networks.", "938" ], [ "I know, it seems odd to me that the Federal Judicial branch is the one branch of government that is immune from the electorate. On the local level, we all recognize that it's a good thing that Judge's should be elected, as they are in most states.\n\nFor what reason Federal Judges don't have to be elected, I have no clue. I've heard people say that it makes them more impartial because they don't need to worry about getting replaced for making an unpopular decision. But it also means they don't fear being replaced for making biased, partisan, self-serving decisions either. That's not a good thing.", "861" ], [ "They don't need to follow the electorate, but they at least need to be able to justify it to the electorate. There's no reason we should be looking to Federal Judges as if they are some magical source of infinite wisdom. Court decision read a lot like party talking points these days. Seldom do I see a court decision make a moral or constitutionally based argument.", "861" ], [ "I read it, I understand the intent argument, but the other two arguments -- that it effectively targets a religion because the country has an arbitrary > 90% majority religion, and that it still targets a religion despite the fact that plenty of majority Muslim countries aren't banned -- seems like fatally flawed logic to me.\n\nBasically, the entire ruling is based on determining intent, which can be subjective and open to interpretation, and intents can change. There's really no legal basis for any of the arguments besides the intent argument, and even that's pretty thin.", "296" ], [ "I mean, it works if you have a dozen people in a startup all working on similar projects and having an open office means you can rent out a cool old industrial loft and put in couches and beanbags and give it a warm and cozy feel since you're there 12 hours a day.\n\nBut then it's adopted by 100-200+ corporate offices that have all the downsides of an open design and none of the benefits. It doesn't really work the same.", "479" ], [ "Except those were based on official statements by actual named officials. Here, we just have more \"anonymous officials\" with zero evidence yet again. It's made even worse by this statement that seems to discredit the entire argument\n\n > The officials interviewed in recent weeks said that, so far, they had seen no evidence of such cooperation.\n\nWait, so you're paraphrasing anonymous officials, implying that <PERSON> was colluding with Russians. And then in the next sentence say those officials don't think he's colluding with them? Which one is it? It makes no sense.", "860" ], [ "I think you make an excellent point. If anything comes out of this investigation, it will just be \"yeah, exactly what we knew all along, <PERSON> has contacts and business interests in Russia\". The problem is that none of that stuff is illegal, and <PERSON> will just shrug it off like \"Well, yeah, I have business interests across the entire world\". Everyone that supported him won't care. Everyone that hated him will still hate him. This isn't going to change anyone's mind.", "853" ], [ "I think you hit the nail on the head. There's a lot of people that don't really identify with either party, but often vote Democrat. And a lot of those people completely wrote off <PERSON> when it seemed like the Democratic platform was more focused on hardcore liberal issues like renaming the Redskins, or making all bathrooms unisex, than actually focusing on \"real\" issues, like the economy, terrorism, immigration, and foreign policy.", "468" ], [ "I mean, these are the kinds of stories we've been hearing for the past couple months -- \"anonymous officials\" make varied and contradicting outrageous claims. None of it means anything until someone official goes on record with something real. For all we know these are just some disgruntled peons commenting on the standard vetting all government officials get as part of their security clearance.", "452" ], [ "Tournaments aren't cheap. Average GP attendance over the last year is something like 1300 people. At $75, that's roughly 100k. Half of that is paid back in prize money. So with 50k, they have to rent out a convention center, organize promotional materials, platmats, etc., organize judges, and then pay for the coverage team, pay the pro appearance fees, plus all the other expenses that go into organizing large events.\n\nLast year when Wizards wanted to end the pro appearance fees, players almost universally complained. When wizards cut GP coverage, players complained. You can't have it both ways. You either want large, expensive events, with big payouts, or you want small, cheap events with few cash prizes. Everything the community has done points to wanting the former. And that is what wizards has done.", "610" ], [ "Because they don't want Modern or Legacy PTQ's since there are no Modern or Legacy PT's. They also don't want player to need 2 competitive decks in two different formats. So Modern and Legacy players will do limited PTQ's and Limited players will play standard PTQs. A player at a GP will only ever need 1 competitive deck.", "471" ], [ "It's funny. In the US, students used to all take Home Economics. It taught some household skills like cooking, ironing, and sewing. But it also taught things like budgeting, interest, and taxes. A lot of schools began dropping the course and replacing it with \"Technology\" courses about 20 years ago. It seems now people are beginning to realize the importance of financial literacy.", "832" ], [ "Show intent to what? Do business in Russia? I think it's pretty far-fetched to seriously believe <PERSON> has some ulterior motive to harm america by colluding with Russians.\n\nRepublicans won't oppose <PERSON>. He's too popular. He gathered more votes than any Republican that's ever run for president. Many of the congressman who won their districts owe a lot of that to <PERSON>. <PERSON> supporters are among the most loyal there are. Expect any congressman or senators who oppose <PERSON> to be personally targeted by <PERSON> in the next election and immediately be voted out. For better or for worse, <PERSON> is president, and likely will be for the next 8 years. Instead of simply protesting *every* thing he does, you'd be better off actually proposing real and alternative solutions to the problems and issues <PERSON> supporters care about -- immigration, terrorism, job outsourcing, the economy -- instead of of focusing on a bunch of trivial pet issues like renaming the Redskins or transgender bathrooms.", "853" ], [ "You get more value IMO if you sell your paper cards for MTGO credit. With power creep and masters reprints, along with Wizards continuing to push out Modern in favor of standard, there's really no guarantee of cards holding value anymore once they rotate out of Standard unless they're on the reserve list (which has it's own set of problems).\n\nI like playing lots of different decks, and I can play significantly more decks on MTGO than I can in paper because it's that much cheaper. Plus, if I want to try a new deck, buy prices on MTGO are like a 5% markdown from sell prices. So I can bump around from a bunch of standard decks and only take a $10-15 hit each time (most STD decks don't cost more than $200-300 online). You could never do that in paper. You take like a 30-40% hit selling your cards.\n\nLike you, I very rarely find a time where I can set aside 4/5 hours to play in person. With leagues on MTGO now, it's much easier to fit a game in here or there and I don't have to spend a bunch of time waiting around for rounds to end.\n\nI still love playing magic in person; I still go to all the Pre-releases, and maybe the occasional draft, or local tournament, or maybe even a GP or SCG open if it comes to my city, but it's been a while since I've been able to hit up an FNM.", "471" ], [ "I'm not really sure, it feels like if anything they make the card more popular at least for a little while after the reprint. Prices are **way** more swingier on MTGO. Cards can quickly go up several hundred percent if a deck becomes popular, and then fall to like almost worthless in the span of a couple weeks. That comment was just to say that thinking of magic cards (in paper or digital) as an investment that will hold value isn't really going to pay off. You're better off just buying the cards you're going to use, and then selling the ones you're not. I basically sell most of my cards whenever standard rotates. I'll usually keep lands, and maybe some cards that I really like to play, but that's about it.", "471" ], [ "> at some point he'll do something to alienate some number of Republican senators\n\nI think you're still under the misguided assumption that it matters at all what congressman and senators think of <PERSON>. Sure, they don't like him. That's part of his appeal. So long as <PERSON> is popular with Republican voters (and he is), Republicans can't touch him. If this election has proven anything, it's that <PERSON> supporters don't really care how much dirt they throw at him. It could come out tomorrow that <PERSON> killed a man and I don't think his supporters would even bat an eye. Hell, it might increase his popularity.", "249" ], [ "There are enough serious side effects and interactions with the different forms of birth control that it makes sense to consult with at least one healthcare professional before starting it the first time. That being said, Pharmacists, PA's, RN's, heck, even Pharmacist Assistants generally have enough knowledge to correctly recommend the right one.", "343" ], [ "Yeah, I feel like most standards at least allowed you to play some of the jankier decks built around some of the lesser played mythics and rares. At worst you'd get to do some oil durdly things with your deck and then lose on turn 12 or 13. Now all those decks lose on turn 4 without getting to even play any of the cool expensive cards.", "344" ], [ "You can play the red combustible artifact. Black has sinister concoction and the other enchantment that destroy creatures, the second one requires artifacts though. Any of the pingers work as well, they used to see play in the Ur spells deck. If you can discard, fiery temper works. Either way, these all require you to leave up at least 1 MANA every turn plus whatever it requires to trigger the other costs for those situational spells.", "961" ], [ "I mean, you've basically just described what a good regular standard format looks like. That being said, I think most of the problem is saheeli. It's the only consistent turn 4 deck in standard that really limits what you can do to interact with it. I mean, that was basically the same complaint with Marvel and why Emrakul was banned. It's a turn 4 deck that is difficult to interact with. People like to point to all the removal options, but that's kind of meaningless since saheeli can just stall to turn 6 or 7 and just counter whatever removal you have.\n\nMardu is technically a turn 4 deck, but realistically it's more like a 5/6 turn deck if you have at least some removal.", "344" ], [ "When I first moved to LA almost 15 years ago, I had to get a new cell phone. So I went to a T-Mobile near West Hollywood. I was trying to get some help, so I look over at the counter and there is <PERSON> in all his glory. There was only one girl working in the store, and she was *completely* infatuated with <PERSON>. I figured there was just no way I can compete with that. So I ended up going to Verizon instead.", "898" ], [ "Well, the problem is both Saheeli and Mardu Vehicles can win on turn 4. BG isn't far behind, turn 5 or 6. \n\nI'm guessing the nut draw for the improvise deck is turn 1: artifact, turn 2: artifact, turn 3: statuary, into 7 drop improvise on turn 4, or maybe 8 drop on 5. But are there any good 7-8 drops that just win you the game? Plus you have to find a way to stay alive that long and hope your bombs don't just die to unlicensed disintegration. And if you don't draw statuary, you're just stuck with a bunch of useless 7 drops that you'll never get to cast. \n\nI like the idea, but it seems like it requires a lot to come together for not that big of a payoff.", "344" ], [ "Exactly, and both those points are wrong. Theres never been a time when technical innovation and increased efficiency and production through automation has resulted in less tax revenue. The idea that the economy is going to collapse and there will be no jobs isn't a new idea. People have been preaching that nonsense every time we displace or obsolete an industry going all the way back to the luddites.", "28" ], [ "Because technically it's a separate company. You could do the same thing. Set up an LLC, or whatever the foreign equivalent is, and receive foreign payments to that Corp. As long as the money stays in that Corp, you don't pay US taxes on it, though you'll probably pay foreign taxes on it. But now, if you ever want to bring that money back to the US economy, you'll be taxed *again*. This is why so many companies just leave their money overseas. It's just not worth the double tax.", "940" ], [ "It's a pejorative term for any economic (but usually tax-related) policy that benefits wealthy people or corporations. It's usually used to refer to the tax cuts in the US originally instituted by <PERSON>. <PERSON> cut the top tax rate from 70% to 28%, and cut the bottom rate from 15% to 11%. Eventually they re-raised the bottom rate back to 15% (which was stupid). <PERSON> lowered it back to 10% when he cut taxes. There were other parts of his economic policy, like cutting certain departments and overall spending, but he was less successful with those. \n\nIn general, the idea behind *supply-side or free market economics* is that a large bureaucratic institution like the Federal government is not very efficient at spending and redistributing money. It makes no sense to tax poor and middle-class people on the margins, and then have states fight to get that money back so it can be distributed to these same people through hundreds of different little welfare programs, each of which require time and effort to administer and to receive. Taxing the most productive people who earn the most income at absurdly high tax rates isn't effective either. It's never been shown to actually increase tax revenue, and the only real effect is that wealthy people either hide their income or move it to lower tax destinations, neither of which helps the US economy. It's better to just leave money in the economy rather than having a complex system of taxing that money out and then trying to spend and redistribute it over an entire nation.", "786" ], [ "> Companies always want to make as much money as possible.\n\nThat's kind of the point. People and companies spending the money are going to be as efficient as possible with that money. They are going to get the most production, the most services, the best bang for their buck out of that money. If you tax that money away, and try to spend or redistribute it through a large bureaucracy like the Federal government, most of it ends up getting wasted and it's spent for many reasons that have nothing to do with efficiency and more to do with providing political favors.", "786" ], [ "This seems like a false dichotomy. In supply-side economics, or at least the way it was implemented, we weren't giving money to anyone. It's the difference between high taxation with inefficient redistribution, or low taxation with very little redistribution. The whole idea was for the government to tax and spend less, and let those decisions be made by the market.\n\nThe conflict usually arises when you have an economy in a state that isn't working very efficiently. How do you get the economy \"going\" again? For Keynsians, the answer, regardless of the actual cause of the economic problems, is always to inflate the currency and create demand. It doesn't matter where in the economy that demand is created, you could literally just have people digging holes and filling them back up again, just create demand for something, so that people can fill that supply and earn money.\n\nFor supply-siders, the answer is not always the same. It depends on what caused the problem to begin with. Almost always, the initial cause was an external influence, like a government tax or economic policy, that caused that market to invest resources in non-productive ventures. Once it's realized that all those investments are worth nothing, people feel poorer, because they are, and so they spend less and the economy slows. Basically, all that bad investment *needs* to be made worthless and liquidated so that people stop investing resources in it. Once that happens, people can rebuild their investments again. Keysians sometimes acknowledge this, they just believe that there's no reason we should have to wait. Why go through a couple years of misery to get back to a productive economy when we could just print and spend money for two years to avert that misery? The problem is that without diagnosing the cause of the problem, Keynsians are just as likely to keep dumping money into unproductive ventures, and the market will never correct itself, and the problem will just be worse when the government spending is turned off.", "786" ], [ "Core sets were usually a pretty fun draft format. It's possible that by the time the 3rd set came out in a block, I was so sick of drafting it that Core sets seemed much better than they were just because it was something different. I don't know that I'd want them back over the current 2 blocks a year format, though. Having a new draft format every other set is much better. If they released core sets as supplemental products, I don't think it would hate it.", "471" ], [ "Saffron Olive did a [Deck Tech](_URL_0_) on a Mardu Reanimator deck that plays it as a 1-of. It doesn't really match up against the current meta very well. If games were longer and grindier, it might be better. It imposes a lot of deckbuilding restrictions, there's not a lot of room in the current meta to just tap out for 6 mana when it won't immediately win you the game, and there are easier ways to cheat big creatures into play with aetherworks marvel.", "344" ], [ "Not really. Take a poll of magic players and you'll find an overwhelming majority in favor of abolishing the reserve list. Because most players don't have those cards. Take a look at the recent modern matters set. They reprinted nearly all the big money cards in the format. Wizards doesn't really have a problem with devaluing cards through reprints anymore. And bad around the MM3 hype, neither do most of the players", "471" ], [ "See, this is how you do it. <PERSON> could have just criticized <PERSON> for 5 minutes, but what would that have accomplished? Maybe some reddit karma and a chance for democrats to pat themselves on the back for how clever they are. \n\nInstead, he made optimistic and empowering statements that play towards <PERSON> major issues -- jobs, free market, ego, legacy. He's actually making real arguments to try and persuade <PERSON> and his ilk, instead of just calling them idiots and racists.", "614" ], [ "Think of any reasonably complex product you can buy right now. It's highly unlikely that you would save any money (especially if you factor in the cost of your time and labor) by trying to design and build it yourself. The reason defense contractors can design and build these things so much cheaper than the government is because they're *already* building similar products on the open market -- jets, rockets, airplanes, satellites. The overhead of factories and production are already being financed by other ventures. So when NASA comes out with a one-off product they need built, contractors are just going to use their existing build processes.", "74" ], [ "Exactly, I think it's just about reworking priorities. People always act like there's this giant army of bad people out there who are deadset trying to ruin the environment and the EPA is some defense against them. Developers and manufacturers aren't these terrible people. The EPAs primary goal should be in helping and promoting clean business practices. You can't do that if your constantly slowing down projects and only seen as a bureaucratic nightmare.", "771" ], [ "It's not necessarily that, it's just morally offensive to tax old people and poor people to pay for extravagances like space travel. Private market space travel is largely being paid for by very wealthy people. The price will come down, but it will still largely be funded by the wealthy for a while. And you didn't have to take money from poor and old people to do it.", "143" ], [ "> An empirically general truth should be concealed in favor of not offending the conservatard snowflakes\n\nIt's not the <PERSON> people you should be worried about, it's all the other people that didn't vote for <PERSON> *or* <PERSON>. Demagoguing <PERSON> isn't really going to win them over for you\n\n > how's that record smashing disapproval rating working out for you?\n\nDoesn't seem to be having any effect. Republicans are still in the middle of repealing obamacare, dismantling a handful of bloated bureacracies, and cutting the budget. If the trend continues, by the time the next elections roll around we'll have lower taxes, the Dow and S & P will still be breaking all-time record highs, unemployment will continue to be at 10 year lows, and job growth will be stronger than it's been in a long time. Good luck winning that election.\n\nThe disapproval rating means nothing. If the last election taught us anything, it's that polls don't matter when it comes to <PERSON>. Apparently, there are a lot of people who don't publicly support <PERSON>, and might even disagree with a lot of his policies, but end up voting for him because of selfish reasons. Namely, the last thing they want are all the tax hikes Democrats keep proposing.", "800" ], [ "Anything over the standard deduction ($6300) is going to get hit with federal income taxes. You're still going to pay 7.65% on everything for SS and medicare, plus the employer match, so you're wage is going to be a little lower to account for that. Then you usually have state income and payroll taxes.\n\nWhen you're only making $200-400/week, an extra $50-80 bucks makes a difference. Most people are going to be working the rest of their lives, a few years not paying SS benefits isn't that big of a deal.", "51" ], [ "They've changed their format. Originally, IMAX was the super giant format that mostly only existed in museums and there wasn't a lot of content for them.\n\nWhen they switched to digital, they created a smaller format that supposedly lets viewers sit closer to the screen to give the same effect. I've been to both styles. I can honestly say that I never liked the old style IMAX and would never see a movie in one. They just made me sick.\n\nThe new-style theaters are basically just really good digital theaters. I haven't tried sitting super close to the screen or anything, but the picture and sound are about the best you can expect from a theater experience.", "321" ], [ "How is this different from not wanting to pay income taxes? It is essentially the same thing but in a different form, no? Objecting to military service is one thing, but for civilian service, it's essentially like a mandatory 100% tax rate for 2 years.\n\nDon't get me wrong, I don't like the idea of compulsory service either, but I also don't like the idea of income taxes in general, and I don't see how you could reasonably draw a significant distinction between the two.", "322" ], [ "Also, if you're doing an emergency compulsory draft, the overwhelming majority of that force is going to be combat infantry. The size, weight, and strength differences between men and women make women almost universally unsuited for that type of military service. It's far more expensive and problematic to try and pick out the 1-3% of women that may be suited for combat infantry than to just not draft them at all.", "798" ], [ "Functionally, they're the same group. It's not correlation, it's just the same exact demographic. If I say rain is slippery, and showers are slippery, and the reason is because water is slippery, I'm not correlating showers to rain, I'm just stating that the reason is water. We know the suicide rate of men is higher than women. If you measure populations that contain mostly men, then you're likely going to get a higher suicide rate compared to other professions that contain more women and fewer men.", "490" ], [ "> more self-administration\n\nMoreso than other careers? Do you think it's at all related to the binary success of Ph.D students? That is, an uncompleted 5 year Ph.D. is worth almost nothing compared to a completed Ph.D, whereas 5 years spent in a job that I end up leaving for a different career still has value and doesn't necessarily feel like wasted time.", "907" ], [ "But your solution isn't any more equitable. The premise of your argument is that because current fines are the same for all people, those with higher incomes will be more likely to commit a crime because the *perceived* punishment is less than it would be for people of lower income.\n\nIf punishments were a percentage of Income, then the *perceived* punishment would be far, far less for lower income people, especially for severe crimes. If the fine for theft was a percentage of income, people with little to no income have very little to lose with a percentage-based fine structure.\n\nI would argue that current data on which economic demographics are more likely to commit crimes would show that people of lower incomes are more likely to commit crimes than those with higher income. So your proposal is a solution in search of a problem that doesn't actually exist.", "314" ], [ "Corporations can't donate to campaigns. When individuals donate to a campaign, they have to list their employer. Individuals have a yearly limit of $2700. So when the news says she received $600k over 14 years, that translates to about 15 people that work for telecoms giving her the max donation every year.\n\nThe problem with restricting campaign donations is that people just end up spending the money themselves. That's why we have superpacs now with spending that is largely completely untracked. If I'm a wealthy person, instead of donating a measly $2700, I'll just buy $1 million in campaign ads myself. Advertising is protected speech, so you can't stop it.\n\n\nThe real solution is to reduce the budget that politicians have to spend, or decentralize those decisions. If you're going to give a few hundred people the power to spend almost 25% of the entire economy, then people are going to try and influence that spending. The problem is giving too few people too much power, not campaign contributions.", "736" ], [ "If you can splash another color, [[Painful Truths]] can draw you an extra card. Going green would get you access to some energy, so [[Glint-Sleeve Siphoner]] could get you some repeatable card draw and a way to chip in for damage. It would also give you access to [[Catacomb Sifter]], which can combo with [[Hidden Stockpile]] to get a decent amount of scrys, which are pretty close to drawing in the late game. \n\nThe biggest problem is that a lot of those cards are too slow for the format, and only work if you're doing something truly broken, like abusing Kalastria Healer and Zulaport Cutthroat. [[Pious Evangel]] might be another card with a similar effect.\n\nThough, I'm thinking of this more as an aristocrats deck than an allies deck.", "535" ], [ "Mercurial takes a simple idea -- branches -- and splits that concept between two different features -- branches and bookmarks -- neither of which work as well as git branches.\n\nMost of the time, branches are meant to be disposable. They exist only so we can continue multiple lines of development simultaneously, without disturbing the \"master\" or \"trunk\". Once a branch is completed, maintaining that branch or the incremental history in that branch isn't all that useful and just serves as noise in the commit log. Mercurial doesn't have a concept of local vs tracked branches from another repository, so there's no elegant way to deal with name conflicts for branches you pull from another repo. Mercurial branches are all long-lived. It's an unnecessary maintenance burden, and although the burden may be small, it's still just added noise. \n\nBookmarks are like a less useful version of git branches. They allow us to create temporary \"branches\" of development, but they're not easily sharable with others, and they don't prevent commits from disturbing master/trunk. The fact that hg uses two different features for essentially the same thing seems to indicate a fundamental flaw in the initial branch design.", "95" ], [ "True, but most projects don't care about tracking the hundreds of branches that have existed over the life of a product. Once a feature is completed, I don't really care what the name of the branch was, or even if the history is a separate branch. It's much more elegant, historically, to have that feature show up as a single commit in the master branch. I don't care about all the iterative commits that were made while that feature was being developed. I don't care that the feature was initially branched from commit 1234 and merged in at 1267. I just want to see that at commit 1266 the product didn't have this feature, and at 1267, it did have this feature. Maintaining branch history is just added noise that has no real additional value.", "95" ], [ "> Since hg's \"bookmarks\" are the equivalent of git \"branches\"\n\nBut they're not. You can't easily share bookmarks. They're not tracked along with the repo. And the don't prevent you from disturbing the master branch. I'd say bookmarks are likely to lead to more trouble, since locally, it feels like you're working with a bunch of different \"branches\", but remotely, you're just pushing everything to master.", "570" ], [ "I assume you're talking about git rebase, which while technically supported in hg via an extension, isn't heavily used by most people.\n\nYou don't actually lose information with git rebase. The full history of commits is still there. All you're doing is curating the history that you publish for others to see and that eventually make their way into the master branch.\n\nIt allows me to do things like create several different local branches with different strategies for implementing a feature, with plenty of commits to preserve development states, but when pushing that out to others to view, there's really no value in pushing all that noise and adding 50 commits to the main commit tree. It's an extra step that hg users don't really consider. Git users don't *have* to do this commit log curation, but because the git tools and workflow make it relatively easy, many do.", "570" ], [ "Not really. Initially, hg had far better windows support, a much better command line interface, and the transition support from svn to hg was much better. But that was like 6-7 years ago. Moving from svn \"branching\" to hg branching literally changed the way I develop. It was such a huge improvement it's really hard to explain in words. But git branching is just better. And the tools for sharing your commits and branches with others are much better simply because more people in git use them and so they get developed. I have the feeling that most people that still use hg use it in roughly the same way they used (or would have used) svn, perhaps with a bit more branching. But I don't think they're really taking advantage of the power of DVCS's and commit curation that is pretty standard in the git community.", "684" ], [ "Not sure it's worth splashing for green. For humans to work,you really need to be playing creatures on curve starting on turn 1. You can't really afford taplands or inconsistent Mana. Also, Avacyn is a better in the 5 drop slot in almost every scenario. Kari zev is probably better than Pia and costs 1 less Mana. \n\nYou could probably cut a land or two and sigarda to add Gideon or the anthem enchantment or just more 1 drops like inventors apprentice.", "122" ], [ "I've seen two flavors of Tezzeret decks. The first is a UB or Grixis Improvise deck that plays things like [[Servo Schematic]] and [[Implement of Combustion]] to ramp out Improvise cards like [[Maverick Thopterist]], [[Bastion Inventor]], and especially [[Herald of Anguish]]. In that deck, Tezz is usually a 1 or 2-of.\n\nThe other deck are various versions of control decks. Sometimes it's straight UB with Torrential Gearhulk as the top end, and sometimes it's a 3 or 4-color dynavolt deck that just happens to have Tezz in it.\n\nI don't have much experience with the 2nd deck, but the first one can be good when you get the nut draws, but pretty terrible if you don't draw your cards in the right order.", "344" ], [ "But there are plenty of people that pay for Google services, or people that got windows upgrades for free. The fact that a company has a free option doesn't really change the root of the argument. Now you're just arguing about prices. For all you know, paid products are cheaper because the sellers can monetize the advertising data. What if a service was only a dollar a year, then can they sell advertising data?", "358" ], [ "Basically, the FCC reclassified an entire industry just so it could regulate it and take that power away from the FTC, who normally regulates issues dealing with consumer protection, and regulates other internet companies like google, Facebook, microsoft, etc.\n\nIn many ways, the FCC is becoming obsolete. They used to regulate the phone companies, and the public airwaves, and much of it was related to censoring content. But many of those technologies are less relevant today, and censoring content isn't as popular an issue as it once was, and most content isn't distributed over public airwaves like it once was. This is basically a last ditch attempt by the FCC to remain relevant.", "717" ], [ "If magic continues to grow, and wizards doesn't actually address the reprint issue, Modern will die. Maybe not right away, but a format can't grow indefinitely with a static supply of cards. Modern Masters doesn't really affect the supply that much. The price of Modern is already pretty restrictive, and unlike Standard, more Modern players will drive the deck prices up. In Standard, deck prices are pretty much determined by the price of the boosters, since if prices get too high, we can just open more boosters. \n\nModern worked initially because a lot of players *already* had a bunch of essentially worthless \"Modern\" cards that just weren't playable in any format, so Modern was created. But now you have a ton more players who haven't been playing that long. They don't have a bunch of Modern cards. But they do have a bunch of Frontier cards that are essentially worthless. So now we get Frontier. It will probably grow and replace Modern as the dominant non-rotating format. Modern will die just like Legacy did. Eventually, Frontier will die the same death in 5-6 years.\n\nOf course, this could all change if Wizards massively changes it's reprint policy and starts re-releasing entire sets, or the price of Modern Masters comes down.", "471" ], [ "Legacy is dead by any reasonable measure. Of the dozens of GP's, only 1 is Legacy. It has zero presence in the pro circuit. Most LGS's don't even host Legacy events. Sure, there are some people that still play Legacy, but Legacy isn't growing. It's not attracting new players, because there just aren't enough cards to serve the current player base. Modern is beginning to suffer from the safe problem. The two benefits that modern has over Legacy is that the Player base was much larger at the time Modern cards were printed, so the supply was greater, and Modern doesn't have to deal with the Reserve List. \n\n > As I said before I don't think moderns soon to die either way\n\nI think that's probably true, too. The player base for Modern has always been much higher than Legacy. But it really depends on how quickly magic grows. If Wizards releases a Hearthstone-like client that works on tablets and phones, and the player base doubles, Modern will die much quicker. There's a limited number of events and tournaments every year. New players are playing Standard and Limited almost exclusively. As the new player base grows, it's only going to push out Modern events the same way Legacy got pushed out.\n\nWizards could fix it though (even for Legacy, too). They could scrap the reserve list, start unlimited reprint sets that run alongside the normal standard set printings and make Modern and Legacy a relevant part of the Pro Tour again.", "471" ], [ "The main advantage is price, and I don't think that would degrade all that quickly. There is *a lot* of M15+ cards in circulation, far more than many of the Modern sets. But yeah, it's going to suffer the same problem eventially, especially if it ever gets a pro tour presence, because then the metagame tends to warp around whatever was played at the pro tour and all the prices spike.", "471" ], [ "> Except the promotional tour isn't for showing off old cards. They want the newest cards on camera\n\nTrue, it doesn't have to be the whole Pro Tour. They already split up the Pro Tour into Standard and Limited sections. They could just replace one of the Standard sections with Modern or Legacy. Or make it a larger side event that takes place the day before. Plus, if they start doing reprint runs, showing those cards being used in Modern and Legacy will probably sell more product as well\n\n > Most lgs don't run modern much less frontier\n\nWhat LGS's are you going to? At all the LGS's near me, Modern is just as, if not more popular than Standard. For example, at the biggest LGS near me, they run *two* Modern events at FNM and only a single Standard event. I think that's probably due more to a lot of people that are tired of the current standard, but Modern is still pretty popular. I think Standard still has the most long-term growth potential.", "471" ], [ "Generally, it's when the geography or expense is such that building a bridge would be more expensive given the size of ships that need to pass through the waterway. \n\nA good example is the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel. The channel needs to allow US Navy ships to pass, like Aircraft Carrier size navy ships. It wouldn't really be economical to build a bridge that size. So for the portions of the bridge that cross the actual shipping channels, there is a tunnel instead of a bridge.", "485" ], [ "Yes, they should have allowed all that bad debt to be liquidated. Basically, housing prices should have fallen at least 30-40%. Probably half of the investment banks should have been forced to declare bankruptcy and have their assets bought by the other half that were more responsible.\n\nFor the housing and investment banking industry, it would have been much, much worse... for about a year. But it would have been pretty great for everyone else. Instead, we spread that misery over the entire economy and it took 8 years to really recover.", "499" ], [ "I feel like most of the Democratic party is in massive denial. Doubling down on super-progressive policies isn't going to win back middle America. Railing against racism and the 1% and transgender discrimination might play well to the base, but those aren't high priority issues for most of America. Foreign policy, immigration, domestic economic policy, terrorism -- these are the primary issues middle America cares about. If Democrats want to win again, they need to start addressing these issues as primary pillars of their platform instead of focusimg on the same dog whistle issues that progressives love to pat themselves on the back for, but largely fall on deaf ears when it come toThe rest of America.", "468" ], [ "I think the progressive wing of the Democratic party has deluded themselves into thinking their issues are far more relevant and popular than they really are. It's not that the Democratic establishment is opposed to economic justice, or environmental policy changes, or military non-intervention, or campaign finance reform, it's just that none of those issues are high priority issues for most voters. Most of the nation is concerned with economic policy, immigration, and foreign policy. Republicans are talking about these issues. Democrat politicians aren't, except to complain about Republicans.", "313" ], [ "It's because most of their accusations aren't based on anything. Yelp doesn't manipulate reviews. They certainly manipulate rankings and search results, but so does Google. Keeping a good yelp presence requires work. If your the type of business that doesn't really care if 1 out of a hundred customers leaves unhappy, you're going to have terrible Yelp reviews even if 99% of your customers are happy, because angry people leave more reviews. You either need to make sure customers don't leave angry, or encourage your happy customers to go on Yelp and leave rewiews", "99" ], [ "It makes lobbying much more expensive and less effective. If you only have to cultivate relationships with a couple hundred people, lobbying is easier. If all 500+ people change every couple years, you have to spend a lot more time and money cultivating those relationships. Also, people are generally the most idealistic when they first arrive in office. It's good that they have to leave office before they get too jaded and just start trying to monetize their position.", "736" ], [ "The Forbes article isn't very convincing. All they did was run a job search for Liberal Arts, History, and English and (surprise!) managed to find some job postings. They didn't compare the *total number* of available jobs vs the number of graduates, or even compare it to job searches for other majors.\n\nI think there is plenty of evidence to show that the rapidly rising cost of college has made Liberal Arts and similar majors a poor return on investment.", "108" ], [ "Anything more than about $2, or anything that sees regular play in standard get sleeved and goes in a binder.\n\nBulk rares go into square plastic cases that hold about 100 cards, unsleeved.\n\nCommons/Uncommons go into cardboard boxes. I used to separate them by set/rarity/color, but now I don't even bother and just keep them separated by set.\n\nPretty much everything in the binder gets sold before it rotates out of standard. I'll usually sell the bulk rares/mythics at the same time.", "471" ], [ "All the things you're mentioning though have either already happened or we tried it and didn't like it so we stopped automating it.\n\nRetail and cashiers are already being automated. It works okay. Hopefully amazon does a better job than the current automated checkouts.\n\nWe've been automating factories for a long time. That will continue to happen.\n\nTrucks and taxis will become automated. Delivery probably not so much. Deliveries are too varied for robots at the moment. Just walking up stairs or traversing uneven terrain is fairly difficult task for robots right now.\n\nHotels, banks, and wait staff are already about as automated as they ever will be. It turns out that in the hospitality industry, people prefer dealing with humans. Also, the types of jobs we're talking about have to deal with a lot of different requests that can't necessarily be scripted. \n\nIt's worth noting that these types of improvements don't necessarily \"take away jobs\". For example, the Amazon stores are likely adding jobs. Those retail outlets didn't exist before. They still need people to stock the store and deliver the items. And to plan future stock and manage the inventory. Those jobs didn't exist before either.", "28" ], [ "Automation leading to less work and automation leading to mass unemployment are two very different things. \n\nChild labor was never very productive to begin with. Child labor didn't end because of automation, it ended because we became much wealthier.\n\n > we're living longer\n\nThat would seem to counter much of your argument. People living longer means they're still occupying jobs that could have been given to someone younger. So the end effect is that there needs to be *more* jobs as people live longer.\n\n > People used to work until they died.\n\nBelieve it or not, the concept of retirement has existed much longer than you think. At least more than a hundred years for the general population. Again, not really a result of automation, but of increased wealth.\n\n > 34 hour work week\n\nTrue, but again, this is largely the result of increased wealth, not automation. People in developing countries have access to many of the same automation techniques, and yet they still work many more hours because they're societies aren't wealthy.\n\nAs you'll notice, none of these wealthy luxuries that allowed us to work less lead to mass unemployment or a collapse of society or a reduction in overall wealth of the average person. Quite the opposite in fact.\n\n > .One might wonder what happens if the trends of the past ~200 years continue.\n\nProbably more of the same of what has been happening. We will be more productive. We will be wealthier. If the productivity gain is high enough people may even start to work less hours per week. They may retire sooner. All good things.\n\nWhat won't happen is long-term mass unemployment. That would be unprecedented in history.", "28" ], [ "> Only if you're using some weird, unintuitive definition for unemployment like the bureau of labor statistics does\n\nMy definition of unemployment is people wanting and needing to work, and not being able to. People that don't work because they *choose* not to work, and because they can afford not to work are not unemployed. \n\n > I don't follow your \"we're wealthier\" argument\n\nChildren not working and old people retiring earlier is a luxury, made available by the fact that we're wealthier (which is indirectly the result of capital resources, technical innovation, and yes, automation). Child labor still exists in this world, but it's mainly limited to poor families in poor countries that *require* that child labor to survive. They don't have the luxury of allowing their children to engage in non-productive behavior, like school, which may yield greater productivity in the future, but only if you're able to sacrifice productivity *now*. It's an investment. Poor families in extremely poor countries don't have the luxury of making that investment.\n\nMy point is that working less has always been the result of increased wealth. It's never been the result of job loss due to automation. \n\n > So what happens if that trend of less work continues?\n\nThat would be a good thing. The only way that would happen is if production skyrockets, leading to greater overall wealth, meaning we can all afford the luxury of working less for the same quality of life. That's much different than the narrative being pushed by the \"OMG automation, the sky-is-falling\" crowd. They believe automation will lead to mass unemployment where everyone is much poorer. I agree that both scenarios will have less people working, but in my scenario they will only work less if they choose to, and even then, they will be wealthier.\n\nWorking is a largely a value judgement. Right now, I could earn more money by getting a second job and working more hours. That choice is available to many people. But most people *choose* not to work more hours, because they value their free time *more* than the nominal increase in wealth provided by working more hours. This same dynamic applies in your example. As production increases in the future because of automation, the purchasing power of workers should also increase by a similar amount. If production gains are 20%, I could either choose to work the same amount of hours with a 20% increase in the standard of living, or work 20% fewer hours for the same standard of living, or some combination in the middle.", "28" ], [ "Well, the main difference is it will be a fraction of the cost. The moon missions in the 60's used extremely expensive components that could only be used for a single launch with minimal payload and were either destroyed or unusable afterwards. SpaceX missions are flown with almost 100% reusable components (except the fuel, of course). It's a rather large design jump.\n\nIt's kind of like the difference between the first mainframe computers and the first personal computer.", "241" ], [ "> productivity pay gap\n\nIt's a little bit disingenuous. The problem is highlighted really well by the [one article](_URL_0_) you mentioned. Take a look at the \"Labor Productivity\" and \"Real GDP per Capita\" lines. Seems kind of odd that Labor Productivity would go up, and Real GDP per capita doesn't, right? How could that happen? It's mostly an artifact of measuring GDP in terms of prices and nominal income. \n\nLets say there's a factory that can produce 100 widgets a year, and sells them for $10/widget ($1000 in GDP per year). Now, the next year the company is able to reduce costs significantly (through automation) and is able to produce twice as many widgets (200). Instead of charging the same price as before (which would result in a doubling of their contribution to the GDP), they decrease the price by 40% ($6/widget). So, they contribute $1200 to the GDP, an increase of 20%, even though their actual output increased 100%. \n\nTheoretically, producing more stuff means prices for everything should fall, leading to a higher standard of living and greater purchasing power for workers *even if their nominal salary doesn't increase*. In effect though, the deflationary pressure of increased production is at least partially counteracted by inflationary policies perpetrated by the Federal Reserve and other central banks.\n\nEither way, these points are kind of moot, because it still isn't going to lead to massive unemployment as the result of automation.", "73" ], [ "Interesting, it looks like they've suspended plans to reuse the 2nd stage. It sounds like it's mostly a design limitation at the moment -- not wanting to reduce the payload just to make the 2nd stage reusable. I still think reusability is the ultimate goal (at least it was originally designed with reusability in mind), and once there is a sufficient number of launches it will become a priority again.\n\nStill, they're definitely reusing the first stage. They've been recovering them successfully for a while now, and they're set to start reusing first stage rockets this year. \n\nNeither the Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy have third stages AFAIK. \n\nIt's worth noting that the Falcon Heavy is just 3 Falcon 9 first stages tied together, so the reusability at least seems to scale.", "241" ], [ "First of all, even if they weren't reusing anything, the launches are already an [order of magnitude cheaper](_URL_0_). Adjusting for inflation, the Saturn V cost about 1.23 *Billion* per launch. The Falcon Heavy will cost about $90 *Million*, and that's without reusing anything. Re-using the 3 stage 1 rockets should bring that cost down further.\n\nSecond, the fact that they're recovering the first stage intact means they've already saved that money. Considering they're already scheduled to start reusing rockets this year, I think it's safe to say they'll be reusing them in 2018 or later when the moon missions start.", "241" ], [ "Interesting. The only price they have on their website is the $90 million figure, even though all the \"performance\" figures are for no recovery at all, except for the GTO amount (8 metric tons). However, based on [this interview](_URL_0_), it doesn't seem like they're factoring any possible savings from recovery into the price. I mean, it sounds like almost the entire cost of the launch is the cost of the first stage rocket. \n\nYou also have to consider that SpaceX is trying to turn a profit, while the NASA prices are just pure cost. Even based on those prices, it's still less than a quarter of the cost.", "241" ] ]
124
[ 23369, 19524, 21037, 5032, 21192, 1434, 24464, 19619, 8341, 3819, 15622, 13135, 7019, 19219, 14761, 6845, 13798, 24196, 22605, 23433, 9734, 16451, 3885, 3463, 6036, 8999, 7256, 18748, 21575, 9467, 19588, 22470, 15771, 21378, 23021, 16169, 21009, 10840, 21223, 10374, 12529, 5328, 23552, 8699, 9656, 8618, 6064, 3491, 9715, 22672, 21491, 6735, 22518, 14473, 23507, 22637, 5902, 3086, 8708, 1211, 20348, 24555, 596, 3908, 24190, 688, 10239, 6021, 11235, 22650, 12610, 21682, 18106, 15149, 3796, 16394, 23320, 13424, 20221, 16625, 14054, 2390, 19744, 24030, 15562, 5833, 14157, 5332, 20825, 6820, 17633, 19950, 13062, 25413, 3989, 13412, 21025, 15053, 25054, 20244, 9189, 3578, 3043, 10457, 4151, 6742, 5082, 7940, 15602, 5954, 9701, 20934, 23858, 2308, 11264, 2132, 5226, 9679, 3739, 7134, 14903, 10923, 11860, 6968, 17620, 18084, 23590, 3384, 7062, 11231, 2203, 12779, 19878, 14907, 22772, 23671, 1739, 6468, 10391, 24823, 23366, 5871, 9427, 15319, 2786, 18198, 8254, 4434, 18187, 11081, 7147, 24118, 23219, 2064, 13805, 21888, 16460, 16704, 11531, 18980, 1089, 21692, 10021, 9283, 21094, 5020, 21654, 23886, 14412, 4373, 21010, 15196, 1008, 2472, 19770, 13925, 19635, 19811, 25539, 20089, 4154, 16933, 5250, 24793, 14840, 16243, 15290, 11608, 10655, 19040, 5494, 6132, 8228, 11780, 3650, 16994, 9182, 16352, 22063, 19737, 10354, 14517, 24399, 2943, 25387, 11410, 10630, 16680, 10656, 19754, 12678, 21920, 13294, 12207, 4390, 1749, 21095, 16203, 19063, 4435, 15612, 7703, 17932, 9317, 5220, 23273, 4644, 13127, 3871, 6282, 12295, 16707, 9566, 20735, 18138, 18649, 23851, 9386, 15306, 8094, 4924, 25526, 12331, 6839, 24567, 25303, 21516, 15943, 3536, 3658, 24495, 20194, 5799, 22514, 25326, 9935, 3258, 17133, 5773, 16525, 2152, 6899, 22609, 21110, 16235, 7309, 17718, 15101, 10135, 11576, 469, 14867, 21660, 7753, 448, 498, 19098, 3538, 23103, 246, 9995, 15277, 13025, 13150, 15796, 9978, 6042, 20946, 19073, 18033, 18838, 1119, 15733, 18962, 755, 17991, 2278, 23195, 1270, 3992, 1383, 11291, 12055, 16675, 23488, 17845, 22084, 452, 12787, 6794, 6508, 4903, 22151, 11625, 12533, 18285, 24496, 14180, 9404, 14483, 22776, 8506, 18006, 3995, 9549, 10336, 11970, 25300, 13895, 2771, 20824, 23800, 2511, 6002, 21813, 17747, 22969, 21591, 19646, 5181, 23964, 3476, 23959, 19327, 14297, 4233, 23996, 3012, 3946, 7549, 2179, 21131, 23386, 21376, 5559, 11795, 9670, 15502, 9909, 15008, 23881, 620, 10772, 14299, 9857, 8201, 16489, 1023, 19403, 25177, 12961, 9895, 10033, 9987, 14817, 15335, 7501, 24640, 12110, 18558, 19041, 5311, 6242, 8019, 10884, 6375, 12510, 14142, 18311, 22118, 21645, 15703, 21351, 24803, 4279, 7445, 11852, 22320, 21672, 18232, 2121, 13845, 20183, 18583, 22290, 13160, 9633, 19140, 12642, 766, 20086, 4583, 14298, 18026, 21098, 16467, 14585, 1979, 23361, 24639, 19000, 9622, 22429, 10589, 17250, 4943, 15012, 19029, 1255, 1390, 11669, 14621, 24791, 16809, 21846, 8779, 15205, 13810, 20032, 20297, 13409, 8828, 18541, 10587, 1575, 15520, 12009, 13280, 23793, 19438, 23752, 12086, 1658, 8859, 4358, 18398, 983, 22387, 16574, 1344, 18004, 10816, 9442, 10371, 11000, 6898, 12047, 569, 7742, 23249, 22966, 22256, 17042, 2001, 23897, 18857, 15458, 9481, 25321, 14409, 19118, 23254, 4658, 3272, 18319, 8693, 8174, 10924, 17868, 20381, 17270, 151, 24721, 3852, 21810, 18123, 16196, 22327, 9073 ]
reddit_dump_00DEADBEEF
[ [ "> Valneva ... british vaccine\n\nValneva is a French vaccine. Funded by the UK.\n\n > Why should the EU be the 1st to sign a contract with a phase 2 british vaccine?\n\nBecause that's how the UK has been so successful. It rapidly purchased vaccines at very early stages of development.\n\n > Can't the US and the UK be labeled as failures by failing to contract with curevac a phase 3 vaccine that might be ready in 1-2 months?\n\nNo because both countries are miles ahead in vaccinations and will be complete long before the EU.\n\n > The EU has order more vaccines as a % of total pop that the US.\n\nSo? The EU ordered late in pretty much every instance because it wanted to haggle on price.", "374" ], [ "I'm not lying. Read what they proposed. If a manufacturer has a shortfall in its commitment to the EU, the EU will block exports to other countries until the shortfall is made up.\n\nStop lying, and start reading.\n\n > EU countries would only grant such authorizations after making sure vaccine makers have delivered the doses of vaccines promised in their “advanced purchasing agreements” with the EU.\n\n > Since both Pfizer/BioNTech and Astra Zeneca are below their delivery targets, this would permit the EU to block exports up to the level of weekly delivery targets.", "374" ], [ "> When this is all over and the EU has not blocked or restricted a single drop, what then? you and all the other troglodytes will carry on, not a worry, despite all the lies, misinformation and fearmongering. \n\nIt's not a lie. It's not misinformation. It's right there in black and white. Those are the powers they've given themselves.\n\n > The EU is flexing on AZ by making them show what they produce and where they export\n\nBullshit. The EU already said they know everything. They said they know how many are produced and where they went. The idea that this is for transparency does not tally with their previous comments.\n\nAlso this isn't just about AZ. It's about Pfizer who are also behind.", "374" ], [ "> You think both groups threatening each other is the way to move forward in a pandemic that demand cooperation? \n\nNo I don't. The UK isn't making any threats. It's keeping a level-head. The point is if the EU did block exports, then threats need to be reciprocated to change their mind.\n\n > Astro Zeneca has made many errors. Just blithely assuming how the can distribute vaccines is only one of them.\n\n > Thinking they would have 80 million vaccines when they have 31 million is another huge mistake.\n\nIrrelevant. The UK and Canada are receiving Pfizer doses.", "374" ], [ "Look I'm not having this discussion again. Go and do some reading.\n\nThe UK has a contract for 100% of the output until fulfilment. Somebody claimed that the sites were listed as primary sites for the EU but there's absolutely no evidence of that and it doesn't make sense that AZ would be stupid enough to do that.\n\nAll of which is besides the point because the EU is doing something different to the UK.\n\n > EU is threatening to block doses destined for other customers. \n\nWe are blocking nothing. That's the difference. That's the end of the discussion. If you want to talk about the contract come back when it's published.", "374" ], [ "The hell are you on about? \n\nYou said:\n\n > Then the UK and \"Canda\" can make vaccines in their own facilities.\n\n > If they don't have any, then maybe they both need to rethink their policies toward nations they need things from.\n\nNothing to do with \"law\".\n\n > Next time, try cultivating friendships instead of rudely dismissing partnerships due to racism.\n\nFriendships? The EU is actively hostile.\n\n > I got my first vaccine three weeks ago. Maybe you'll get yours in 2022, unless of course your rotting fish research pays off. Cheers.\n\nLol what a ridiclous claim. The UK is far ahead of you and we have already received a huge amount of our Pfizer doses and can complete our vaccination programme ahead of the EU with the internal capacity we built because we didn't dither and delay for months like the EU Commission who are now in a blind panic.\n\nCheers.", "374" ], [ "> I imagine long term this will be an absolute boom for the Swiss economy.\n\nEveryone except the EU. It's likely we'll need tweaked vaccines every year. Where will companies set up any new facilities they need? Certianly not the EU who have now proven a willingness to block them from delivering on their contractual obligations. The states around the EU like Switzerland, the UK, and Norway, stand to benefit.", "374" ], [ "> It's not like taking the vaccine will get you any freedoms back right now until herd immunity is achieved\n\nThis is why you would take it. If people don't take it, it'll take longer to get to that point.\n\nAnyway, you can be young and vulnerable, so still able to benefit from this vaccine.\n\n > Public trust has been destroyed\n\nIt's almost like that was their goal.", "235" ], [ "> If AZ promised a certain quantity by a certain time\n\nSeems like you don't understand that AZ said they didn't make a promise. The contract is out tomorrow. We'll see.\n\n > Also seems like there are a lot of Brexiteers\n\nI'm a remainer though. The EU just look like utter shit heads this week and deserve all the hate they're getting.", "564" ], [ "> The thing is even if the mood in the UK was charitable and pro-eu (it’s not, even in left wing papers), their plants aren’t producing enough to make a significant dent in the Eu’s shortfall.\n\nThis is one of the reasons why the EU's demands are absurd. The UK has a bigger shortfall than the EU but it thinks it can requisition UK supplies to make up its smaller shortfall, all the while screaming that it expects countries to share the shortfalls, but will block exports to all countries until the EU doesn't have a shortfall.", "631" ], [ "I think when they say:\n\n > Germany is spreading disinformation about the vaccine\n\nThey may be referring to certain papers who decided to run with the claim that it's only 8% effective in over 65s as if that's a fact, even the confidence interval is so huge the number could be almost anything. In fact the interval is so huge, the paper could have claimed that the vaccine actually promotes new infections in over 65s and it would have been equally as valid.\n\nAs for the rest of their comment, it makes no sense.", "929" ], [ "This. The EU's position is one of hypocrisy. \n\nOn the one hand they say they'll stop exports from EU-based facilities if they have a shortfall on deliveries. On the other hand, they say they're happy to take vaccines from non-EU facilities to make up their shortfall, even though the facilities they're threatening to take from already have a shortfall in their other obligations.\n\nThere is nothing stopping the UK from taking the same measures and blocking exports until, at the very least, our 90% shortfall is resolved. \n\nAnother example of their hypocrisy is that they say they want all countries to share the shortfalls equally. Well that's already at odds with them blocking exports, but the UK has a bigger shortfall and yet they want to take UK vaccines making its shortfall worse. Hardly equal.\n\nAnd finally, they say vaccine nationalism is bad. But they've thrown the first stone.", "374" ], [ "The EU is already threatening to cut off those exports. Their new powers will allow them to block export from any supplier who has a shortfall in its commitments to the EU. Pfizer has a shortfall and I read it's not expected to make it up until end of February. So that is potentially several weeks of blocked exports already on the cards.\n\nBesides, the UK has already received a huge amount of its Pfizer order. It's producing 2m doses a week internally of the AZ vaccine. It's about to receive Moderna via Switzerland, and Novavax produced domestically. Also J & J via the EU with the UK's deliveries scheduled before the EU's, so they can't claim there is a shortfall and block it. It's about to open a new facility capable of producing 15m doses a month: _URL_0_\n\nThe UK will be fine.", "374" ], [ "The UK placed its order first. Almost immediately after that order, AZ spun up EU production, because it could as the UK paid for it. EU production would be even further behind if the UK hadnd't ordered.\n\nAlso, the plants you refer to, are owned by AZ, a British company. The implication that the UK's tiny shipment in December was stolen from the EU is totally false. And even if it was stolen, it was nowhere near enough to explain the shortfall. It's not like the UK got 75m doses that were meant to go to the EU.\n\n > Beyond that, the UK has already vaccinated the most vulnerable and is far ahead of Europe\n\nNo it hasn't. All vulnerable groups should be done by April so long as our \"friends\" don't try and steal our supplies.\n\n > It would be pretty stupid of the UK to try and not cooperate here. They are by FAR the weaker party, too.\n\nIn terms of vaccinations, they are in a much stronger position. The EU is the one in desperation here. They don't even appear to have approached the UK directly. Instead they just publicly imply they're going to take it. It's really poor diplomacy, and they're doing a great job of making themselves look like villains. They've also sent a clear message to other companies that they are not a reliable place to build new pharmaceutical facilities as they're quite willing to block your exports and prevent you fulfilling your contracts.", "374" ], [ "> Still doesn’t mean that EU fucked up or anything. I think UK fucked WAY more up giving the elderly a vaccine that hasn’t been tested on them. Absolutely ridiculous and IMHO criminal. \n\nOh please. There may be a lack of efficacy data but there is no lack of safety data. It's an extremely safe vaccine, and giving it to over 65s is therefore an extremely low risk. Any protection at this point is better than no protection. If the efficacy turns out to be low, they can be revaccinated with something else later. The fact is we have a lot of vaccine available right now, and the criminal act would be to NOT put it in people's arms.\n\n > Still doesn’t mean that EU fucked up or anythin\n\nThe EU delayed by three months. Their production could be three months ahead by now and this situation would not even exist. EU bureaucracy is slow and that's why their vaccine programme is so far behind the US and UK. They are *still* negotiating for things like Novavax.", "374" ], [ "The fuckup is on the EU side. If you don't see the political games the EU is playing, then perhaps your own media has got to you.\n\nThey've ordered late for multiple vaccines and will receive shipments later than other countries. There was already a deal like the UK's on the table, but the Commission took over and after three months of delay changed nothing.\n\nThey want all countries to share equally in shortfalls, but today will sign a law that allows them to block exports so that the EU's shortfall is made up first.\n\nThey don't want vaccine nationalism, but are playing nationalistic games.\n\nGermany has elections soon. One of the candidates to replace <PERSON> is the Health Minister.\n\nEU's vaccination rollout is way behind the UK and US.\n\nThe optics are terrible. Internally this is a huge political mess and they're desperately lashing out and trying to cover it up by making other countries or companies look bad.\n\n > Its right to stop the export of vaccines if companies are fucking the EU over and the UK is still insisting on receiving the same quantity, rather than sharing success. \n\nThis is such a hypocritical statement. The UK was due 30m doses from AZ in September. We've got nowhere near that. How is it right that the EU can stop the export of vaccines to recover their shortfall? How is it not right for the UK to do the same?", "374" ], [ "That's not even the same thing and you know it. The UK has not banned exports. The UK has pre-ordered the first 100m doses from its facility. There's nothing else to sell to anyone.\n\nOn the other hand, the Pfizer facility in Belgium has contracts with the EU, UK, Canada, and probably Israel. The EU is threatening to block them all.\n\nThe UK's position is that it expects what it paid for. The EU's position is that it is willing to take what others paid for.", "374" ], [ "> I agree, I don't understand why the AstraZeneca CEO thought it would be a good idea to talk about confidential parts of the agreement with newspapers all over Europe. With that he broke the confidentiality clause. It shows incompetence from AZ's part once again.\n\nYou've got this wrong. The EU demanded the contract be released. Then when he spoke of the \"best effort\" clause, they lost their minds, said he breached confidentiality, and that his actions breached the contract.\n\nThey did not like that revelation at all which suggests the best effort clause may indeed exist. But we'll see.", "374" ], [ "> The EU has also pre-ordered 100mil doses and it seems than thise doses are to be supplied by UK factories.\n\nNo the EU paid for the upgrade of the Belgian facility to get these doses \n\n > Good thing that the EU made the purchase last year then.\n\nThree months after the UK already purchased the UK's first 100m doses\n\n > And on the other foot, the AZ facility in the UK has contract with the EU and the UK is threatening to block it.\n\nNobody knows for certain. The UK has not threatened to block it, actually.\n\n > The EU's position is that it expects what it paid for. The UK's position is that it is willing to take what others paid for.\n\nYou've switched this around, but it's wrong. The EU ordered Pfizer doses from a shared facility (owned by an American company). But it's threatening to block exports from it.\n\nThe UK ordered doses from a facility it paid to construct, and it paid for exclusive rights to use it. There's nothing to block because those doses already belong to the UK.", "374" ], [ "What do you think of 5.1? It seems to me (not a lawyer so this is my bs opinion) that the contract is clear that the \"Initial Europe Doses\" (that is, the first 300m) are to be manufacutred \"within the EU\" (which in 5.1 does not include the UK). \n\nOnly 5.4 includes the UK, and it says that the inclusion of the UK only applies to 5.4.\n\nMy (again probably bullshit) interpretation is that the intention was for the first 300m doses to be produced in the EU. Meanwhile, in its separate contract with the UK, the UK's first 100m doses are produced exclusively in the UK. By time the EU's 300m was expected to be delivered, the UK's 100m would also be delivered, meaning they could then deliver the \"Optional Doses\" from the EU (including the UK).", "374" ], [ "> UK manufacturing sites are mentioned, but only to say that AZ may use them, but need permission for other non-EU sites - see 'only for the purpose of this section'. \n\nNo because in 5.4 the UK is regarded as part of the EU, and only for clause 5.4, so no permission is needed for AZ to manufacutre in the UK.\n\nYou missed clause 5.1 which is arguably the most important. It makes quite clear that the first 300m (Initial Europe Doses) will be made in the EU, which in that section does **not** include the UK.", "374" ], [ "> No this is where AZ fuck up is. The EU contract says there is no sequencing. i.e. no other contract would affect the EU contract. So best reasonable effort is overridden.\n\nYes there is a sequence. \"Intitial Europe Doses\" then \"Optional Doses\".\n\nClause 5.1 says the \"Initial Europe Doses\" will be produced in the EU. That does not include the UK.\n\nClause 8.3 defines \"Initial Europe Doses\" as 300 million.", "374" ], [ "Basically that clause seems to give AZ the option to produce in the UK, without asking for the EU's permission (because UK has equivalent laws and standards, presumably). \n\n5.1 says the first 300m doses will be made in the EU.\n\n5.4 says the UK being treated as part of the EU applies in clause 5.4 only.\n\nClause 5.4 references the optional order of 100m doses.\n\nAZ can use UK facilities to produce any of the doses, in particular the 100m doses, but can not be forced to do so.", "374" ], [ "By murdering British people who have already paid for the vaccine doses you intend on stealing. I thought the EU was meant to be a \"guiding light\" A bastion of morality and all that's good in the world? How long will you let your crisis go on before you decide to invade some other country to take vaccines by force?\n\nEU is literally evil right now.", "374" ], [ "5.1 says the initial doses will be made in the EU.\n\n5.4 gives AZ the *option* of using UK facilities (without seeking EU permission), but does not require it to do so. It seems more targetted at either a future ramp up in capacity (i.e. when the UK's contract is delivered), or the production of the 100m option which will almost certainly be long after the UK's 100m doses are complete.\n\nThis is great news for the UK. They can't have our vaccines.", "374" ], [ "Not quite. The Initial Europe Doses will be produced in the EU (5.1).\n\n5.4 gives the option to AZ to accelerate delivery using UK facilities without permission from the EU, but only at their reasonable best efforts.\n\nSo it's up to AZ. EU can't force them. Reasonable best efforts can't possibly include breaking a pre-existing contract.\n\nClause 5.4 goes on to talk about the optional doses. Clearly AZ's intent was to accelerate delivery of the initial doses, if possible, when the UK's order was complete, and to use UK facilities to produce the optional doses.", "374" ], [ "What has Android got to do with macOS? macOS and iOS have totally different ways of managing memory. On iOS if you run out of memory, apps get evicted (that's why they reload) to free memory for the app that you're using. On macOS, if you run out of memory, it starts using your SSD as a swap device but keeps all of your apps running.", "697" ], [ "Honestly it's insane and the most puzzling part is the claim an i9 MacBook Pro struggled. I have a much more extreme workload including running IDEs, virtual machines, and smulators, on an old 16GB 15\" rMBP and it's fine. It swaps a lot, but it does the job and it never feels slow. My work isn't even that CPU intensive, so it's rare I even hear the fans spin up.", "689" ], [ "> They break many of the concepts that we have come to accept. You may have needed 32 GB of upgradeable memory in the past, and internal storage which you can replace as your Music library grows. Now all the main components – CPU, GPU, memory and internal storage – are tightly integrated and interdependent.\n\nPlenty of people still do need 32GB of memory. Yes there's a clear advantage to not having to copy from disk to RAM and then to VRAM, but that's only an advantage working with things that require your GPU. Not everyone does that with their Mac. Developers run complex IDEs and multiple virtual machines and simulators. The M1 does not change their need for memory.\n\nAlso this type of improvement isn't unique to Apple. The PS5 can do it, and nvidia's new GPUs can load data directly from an NVMe SSD, bypassing the CPU and RAM.\n\n > After all, an internal SSD is only larger and slightly slower-access memory.\n\nActually DDR4 has a throughput of up to 25GB/sec, meanwhile Apple went cheap on the SSDs that only deliver around 2 to 2.5GB/sec, yet there exist NVMe drives that can now do 6-7GB/sec, which still isn't close to RAM. And that's before you even consider latency. SSDs have a latency of around 50,000ns vs RAM at 50ns. Yes requests to NVMe SSDs take 1000x longer than RAM.", "448" ], [ "I can't see that happening. Selling high priced enthusiast components is a big money maker for all involved. SoCs like the M1 might become the norm for cheap business machines but not for gaming. AMD and nvidia already have or are working on technologies that can replicate some of the features in M1. E.g. new AMD CPUs can write directly to the VRAM of new AMD GPUs. New nvidia GPUs can now read directly from an NVMe SSD instead of waiting for the CPU to copy data in to RAM then in to VRAM.", "816" ], [ "There are a few advantages\n\n1. For GPU work there's no need to move data between RAM and VRAM, it's one and the same;\n2. Similarly, other components like the Neural Engine, also have direct access to memory;\n3. The RAM is physically closer to the CPU which lowers latency\n\nThat's about it. Really #1 is the biggest advantage, but it's something consoles now have too. Hardly unique. But you have people on here who've been drinking the kool aid running around saying an M1 with 8GB of RAM will do everything an i9 with 32GB of RAM could do. Like there's some kind of magic memory fairy inside.", "153" ], [ "> Not true. Unified memory and the way the OS handles memory can result in significant improvements. Unified memory means the data in the RAM doesn't have to be copied from the CPU to the GPU and vice versa. Both can access it at the same time. Less duplication means lesser memory required. \n\nThis is great if your workload is GPU-bound. But otherwise it doesn't help much.", "85" ], [ "This article is pretty bad. See my comments here: _URL_0_\n\niPhones get away with limited memory because iOS aggressively evicts apps from memory if it starts to run out, and because iOS itself simply needs less than Android.\n\nmacOS is totally different to iOS so in no way are your observations about iOS' memory management applicable to a Mac, not even one with Apple Silicon in it. If you run out of memory on macOS, it won't kill other apps. It will use your SSD as swap and keep your apps running.", "689" ], [ "> The 2nd highest ranked link when you search for \"unified memory\" is that page.\n\nGoogle's ranking algorithm accounts for popularity, not correctness.\n\n > I've seen a lot of iPhones from non-tech users and they have dozens of apps running in the background.\n\n > I even pointed it out to some and taught them how to quit these background apps when their iPhone becomes too sluggish.\n\nWell you're incorrect because iOS doesn't have true multitasking for third-party apps. iOS allows apps to complete very specific tasks in the background using APIs provided by Apple. When you switch away from an app, for the most part it is simply suspended in-memory.\n\nSince an app is not really running in the background, and since iOS will automatically kill apps to free up RAM, manually quitting them will not improve performance.\n\nIn fact, manually quitting an app like that may worsen your battery life because if iOS did not need to evict it, then all you've done is cause it to reload from scratch the next time you open it.\n\n > Tech transfer from iOS to macOS, thanks.\n\nThis sentence makes no sense whatsoever.\n\n > My first statement specified that both macOS and Apple Silicon allows for more efficient unified memory management.\n\nThe unified memory of the M1 increases speed, and is more efficient for GPU workloads. That's all.\n\n > I've been using Macs since MacOS 9.x and iPhones when iOS was formerly called iPhone OS so I am somewhat familiar with how Apple's OS behaves.\n\nSo have I. Big deal. It's not something I feel the need brag about. I don't think you know as much as you claim to.", "697" ], [ "> iPads are not directly comparable with gaming laptops.\n\nI never compared them. If your interest is gaming, then a desktop PC is better. The iPad is a portable computing device, and if you want you can stream games from your PC to it.\n\n > And if you're going to count bulk and battery life as a negative for gaming laptops then you should count them as double negative on desktops as they're significantly more bulky, have zero battery.\n\nThis is a bizarre thing to claim. You don't need to carry a desktop PC around. It never needs to run on battery.", "127" ], [ "You want citations but don't provide any of your own? If you know so much about iOS and macOS why do you even need to verify my claims? You should just know I'm right.\n\nDDR4: _URL_3_ - 35.2GB/sec\n\nSamsung's best SSD: _URL_5_ - up to 7GB/sec\n\nMacBook Air SSD speed: _URL_4_ - only 2.6GB/sec\n\nNVMe latency _URL_1_ - 250 microseconds = 250,000ns\n\nDDR4 latency _URL_6_ - < 8ns\n\nClosing apps makes battery life worse: _URL_0_\n\niOS apps do not run in the background and instead have to use very specific APIs: _URL_2_", "448" ], [ "Plenty of people do. Why do you think Apple sells Macs with up to 1.5TB of memory?\n\n > This is why iOS can get by with 4-6GB but android typically has 8-16GB.\n\nNo this is completely false. iOS needs less memory for itself than Android. Also, iOS does not support true multi-tasking for third-party apps unlike Android. Instead iOS apps are forced to implement specific background functionality through APIs Apple make available. And finally, iOS will agressively kill any app that isn't in the foreground if the app that is in the foreground needs more memory than is currently available.\n\n*That's* how iOS does it. Not because of some undefined memory magic.\n\nmacOS does absolutely none of this. Instead it will use your SSD as swap and keep apps running forever.", "697" ], [ "The only difference is that data bound for the GPU doesn't have to be copied through main memory. As I said earlier, this is a boost for GPU-bound applications.\n\nEverything I provided is up-to-date. There is no additional \"magic\" going on inside macOS. It works the same way it always did, and an SSD is a poor substitute for a lack of memory, and using my references above you will see why the article that claimed SSDs were almost as fast as memory is absolutely wrong.\n\nNow, do you have any citations to counter anything I said?", "689" ], [ "How about we just use React Native for desktop instead? Electron isn't salvageable, every app has an entire copy of Chrome inside it and Google have shown no interest in reducing Chrome's memory usage or making it use less CPU.\n\nElectron was always a bad idea. I'd rather use a Java app than Electron.", "561" ], [ "Fusion Drives were an awful way for Apple to avoid putting an SSD in an iMac, and a spinning disk has no place in a laptop. It's far too vulnerable. The new MacBook Air finally has no moving parts inside. Apple have finally been able to make it what it always should have been. It's perfect. Let's not ruin it.\n\nA Fusion Drive with such fast flash would also be difficult to make. The Fusion Drive was SATA, which M1 likely doesn't support. To get those kinds of speeds you need NVMe, which the M1 does support, but the HDD would still have to be SATA.", "448" ], [ "> Serverless computing is a cloud computing execution model in which the cloud provider runs the server, and dynamically manages the allocation of machine resources. Pricing is based on the actual amount of resources consumed by an application, rather than on pre-purchased units of capacity.[1] It can be a form of utility computing. Serverless is a misnomer in the sense that servers are still used by cloud service providers to execute code for developers. The management and details of these servers are transparent to the application developers. \n\n_URL_0_", "570" ], [ "I've had about enough of YouTube, they're now using it to push Google Chrome.\n\nUp until a few weeks ago I could go to _URL_0_ and enter a code from the app on my TV, which would allow me to browse YouTube on my computer and send the video to my TV to play.\n\nBut they've now taken that away. You can only \"cast\" to a TV app if you use Chrome. Fuck that. I'm now watching less YouTube and therefore seeing less ads as a result.\n\nAlso I have the same experience as you in that my recommendations are full of stuff I've already seen.", "358" ], [ "No that's what we're talking about. You just moved the goalposts. You said \"No correct program is going to be memory bound on a laptop.\" which is completely false.\n\nMy IDE needs about 4GB just to analyse my code. That's not faulty behaviour, it's expected behaviour.\n\nIf I have a virtual machine that needs 16GB of RAM to run, that's not faulty behaviour, that's expected behaviour. Using up RAM does not indicate a problem, it can simply indicate that storing a large amount of data is necessary.\n\nIf you have complex analytics software such as R, and you need to open up a 16GB dataset, guess how much memory you'll need? That's right, 16GB and that doesn't make a programme broken.\n\nYou literally have no idea what you're talking about, so this conversation isn't going to go anywhere. Bye.", "448" ], [ "> RAM does not directly increase the speed of your system, there’s no difference between 8gb of ram and 16gb of ram if you’re not using more than 8gb in the first place. \n\nWell, your OS can cache commonly used files and applications in the extra memory, so it's not totally wasted. The difference is marginal, but it's there.\n\n > This is especially true with Apple products as they manage RAM differently than a typical windows system by heavily relying on virtual memory and efficient resource management. \n\nThey're not that different really. Both will swap/page if you get low on memory. Both will cache files in memory.\n\n > Edit: I believe apple also compresses RAM giving it a huge advantage over traditional RAM management.\n\nBoth macOS and Windows 10 use memory compression.", "689" ], [ "> If you’re arguing that we should be trying to minimize virtual memory then you would still only get minimal performance gains as the point of virtual memory is to store the inactive RAM.\n\nThis isn't true. The point of virtual memory is to avoid your computer running out of memory. If you had no virtual memory your computer could just crash if you ran out of physical memory. Stuff moved to virtual memory isn't necessarily inactive, it just might be a bit old. As soon as you try and access that data again it has to be moved back in to memory, and something else will be moved out to take its place. If you only go over your physicaly memory by a little bit, you won't really noticed. But if you exceed your physical memory by a lot, then the OS will be nearly constantly moving stuff around and you switch between apps.", "171" ], [ "macOS doesn't manage memory in the same was as iPad OS though. iPad OS will force quit apps if the app you have in the foreground requests more memory than is available. macOS never does this. 4K video editing can be enabled by having fast flash, so when you scrub through content it gets streamed off disk instead of being held completely in memory.", "689" ], [ "If true it will likely mean lockdown longer than people hope. A quarter of all COVID admissions are under 55. We're only vaccinating 70+ by mid-February, if we even meet that target.\n\nIf we let a highly transmissible variant run rife then it's likely that young people alone are enough to fill up hospitals, which as this article indicates does actually cause a lot of deaths to non-covid issues.", "912" ], [ "What the WHO has forgotten is that we've been working with manufacturers around the world to get them producing the AZ vaccine. It will be sold at cost. We're basically going to give away billions of doses, but they think we should stop our internal programme for the sake of a few million, which as you say, is barely a drop in the ocean.\n\nWe're also the biggest contributor to COVAX and Gavi.", "374" ], [ "Yes 5.4 is talking about where production is allowed to take place, and what happens if there's a shortfall. The inclusion of the UK seems to be so that the EU doesn't have to waste time granting permission to AZ to optionally produce some vaccine there. This is because the UK still has an identical framework of laws and standards to the EU. Non-EU countries require approval.\n\nThe inclusion of the UK does not seem to be to require production there. \n\nThat much is clear because: \n\n1. There's a mandate in 5.1 which explicitly calls for the first 300m doses to be produced in the EU;\n2. 5.4 clearly says the UK's inclusion as part of the EU is only for the purposes of 5.4. In other words it's deliberately worded so as not to override 5.1.", "374" ], [ "Can you explain your reasoning for that, because we've already been through this? BREs cannot compel them to break another contract, especially if that pre-existing contract allowed this one to even come in to existence.\n\n5.4 grants them permission to use the UK, but not for IED as those are required to be produced in the EU by 5.1.\n\nAnyway, I'm done. You asked me to explain the reasoning. I did. Now you're starting another argument. The legal consensus is clear that AZ does not have to supply any of the first 300m doses from the UK.", "374" ], [ "Now that the contract has been released, lots of lawyers have weighed in with their opinion. \n\nThere's consensus that:\n\n* AZ is correct, it does not have to take supplies from the UK to meet its obligations;\n* AZ is also correct when it said its contract was best-effort.\n\nThere's an open question: has AZ done enough to meet its best reasonable efforts requirement? But that doesn't affect the UK suppiles.\n\n_URL_1_\n\n_URL_6_\n\n_URL_10_\n\n_URL_5_\n\n_URL_4_\n\n_URL_0_\n\n_URL_3_\n\n_URL_8_\n\n_URL_7_\n\n_URL_9_\n\n_URL_2_", "374" ], [ "> our production capacity\n\nIn Pfizer's* production capacity. They own that facility.\n\n > But AZ Europe is having production issues, but AZ UK won't share production capacities.\n\nYou accidentally made an interesting point. The UK and EU have contracts with two different companies. One based in Sweden, one in the UK.\n\nAlso, you missed out on a very important point. The UK's early order allowed AZ to kickstart production in the EU. The EU is already benefitting from the UK's money. If the UK hadn't ordered, your production would be further behind. You have no right to double-dip.", "374" ], [ "> Having said all of this, I would have been supportive of sharing some of the UK vaccine stock - but the EC is making that an increasingly difficult stance to support\n\nThis is a huge problem they've created for themselves. They've literally dropped bombs on their relationship with the UK with their claims they're entitled to the UK doses, and that they can and will take them, or that they can and will block exports, etc etc.\n\nBut the fact is, their contract gives them no right.\n\nThe only way they can share in our supply is to be fucking adults and ask the UK nicely. Only the UK can give permission, not AZ. But since they decided to have public temper tantrums and piss off the UK I can only imagine what the answer will be. Last week the British public would have probably been in support of helping. This week, everyone is fucking done with the EU. Even remainers like me.", "374" ], [ "> No, it really isn't. Because according to the contract AZ would have to apply to supply from India\n\nYes they would have to apply to the EU, not to India. So why aren't the EU demanding this happen? Oh that's right, they can only apply to produce somewhere else. Not steal from somewhere else. Same reason they can't take from the UK. They can only produce there, but there is no facility available for them to produce in. The only ones that exist are already contracted out.", "374" ], [ "Keyword: reasonable. Yes that quote gives them *permission* to use the UK supply. It doesn't compel them to, because the UK output is already contracted out. Breaking a contract is not *reasonable* behaviour. If it's reasonable to break one contract to honour this one, it's reasonable to break this contract to honour another.\n\nEg1: AZ's UK facility is idle, not producing anything. Should AZ use that capacity to fulfill its EU order? Yes, that's reasonable.\n\nEg2: AZ's UK facility is fully contracted out to another country. Should AZ use that capacity to fulfill the EU order? No, because breaking a contract is not reasonable.", "374" ], [ "Misleading headline\n\n > Constructive talks with Prime Minister @BorisJohnson\n tonight. \n > We agreed on the principle that there should not be restrictions on the export of vaccines by companies where they are fulfilling contractual responsibilities.\n\nThis is what she Tweeted last night. In effect, nothing has changed. This is exactly what they were planning anyway. If Pfizer ends up with a shortfall they will block exports, including to the UK.", "374" ], [ "> It was always just a measure to check if the EU got their fair share.\n\nIncorrect. The plan was to block all exports from a manufacturer if it had a shortfall to the EU. In other words, EU will take more than its fair share until the shortfall is made up, rather than sharing the shortfall among all customers which is what they claimed they wanted just days before announcing this policy.", "437" ], [ "How much time, energy, and money went in to that technology? It was wrong of you to claim it as all your own.\n\n > But even without that, I would like to highlight how stupid it is to say that because the vaccine was developed in country A people from country A should have priority\n\nYou're right. That's why the UK is licensing its IP out so vaccines can be produced at no cost across the world.\n\nIs Germany/BioNTech doing that? No, they're milking all the profit. Profiting from a global health crisis? That's just vile.", "374" ], [ "Clause 13.1(e) seems to not apply for two reasons:\n\nFirstly, AZ is only obligated by 5.1 to use EU facilities for the Initial Europe Doses. Since it's currently producing those IEDs, it is under no obligation to use UK facilities. Therefore, its pre-existing commitment to the UK to use UK facilities does not prevent it from fulfilling its obligation to use EU facilities to produce for the EU.\n\nSecondly, the pre-existing contract is a benefit to the EU. The UK's order allowed AZ to kickstart production in the EU. Without that order, the EU's production would be even further behind. In other words, AZ's pre-existing commitments is actually helping AZ to deliver on its obligations.\n\nEven if AZ was in breach of 13.1(e), it gives the EU no power to demand UK vaccines. It simply means AZ is in breach and the EU can sue for damages.", "374" ], [ "> They do seem to have gone quiet on claiming a contractual obligation and simply moved to a possible national security kind of argument, I think?\n\nYeah now that the contract's out. The consensus is that the EU was wrong to claim rights over vaccines produced in the UK. It also vindicated AZ's claim that it was a \"best-efforts\" contract. What a hole they've dug for themselves. The only question that remains is *has* AZ met is reasonable best efforts obligations?", "374" ], [ "100% agree. I even posted the latest news where the EU and UK agreed a \"reset\" but that was deleted because of the megathread. 99% of the replies were nice and chill, very contstructive, and people were moving on from the drama. But the megathread is a cesspit where the link to the article about the \"reset\" has been buried under a stream of new toxicity. By confining the drama to that thread, they're prolonging it because whenever anybody opens it, they're immediately presented with a toxic mess.", "564" ], [ "If you wan't to meet climate aims you shouldn't be taking [transatlantic flights](_URL_0_) either because one ~~flight~~ trip undoes two years of being vegan~~, so one round trip undoes four~~.\n\n > You can love animals and kill them after they've only lived 5% of their life expectancy in a cage/concrete pen?\n\nIf only we had ways of rearing animals for food without torturing them...\n\n > But what about pandemics? Most are being caused by animal-ag.\n\nTighter regulations and harsh enforcement. These things happen because of unsanitary conditions.\n\n > And then we've got unhealthy rivers, monocultures, ocean dead zones, 60-80% of all plastic in the ocean is made up of fishing nets, etc, etc ,etc, etc, etc, etc\n\nSo change fishing practices? Fishing can be completely sustainable.", "166" ], [ "I'm not a long way off actually. Here are some calculations: _URL_0_ once you factor in the entire supply chain and the extra damage high altitude emissions does, you get to 250KG CO2e per passenger per hour of flight. 7hrs for a London < - > New York flight, and you're at 1.75 tonnes. Add in the round trip and you're at 3.5 tonnes.\n\nUsing your figures, that return flight is equivalent to 813 days of savings made from switching from meat to a vegan diet.", "516" ], [ "I just put a pork shoulder joint in the oven. Organic, free-range, and ethically reared and slaughtered from a local farm. I agree not everyone can afford to pay £25 for that (you can get the same cut and weight for only £5 in Aldi) but animal welfare can be improved with only marginal increases in cost. \n\nAlmost every egg sold in the country is now free-range, which while not perfect, is a huge step up from the battery farmed hell eggs that used to be sold. Eggs are still affordable.\n\nAlmost all of our beef already comes from cows that are allowed to graze and eat grass naturally in the summer, while being fed silage in the winter. Yet in other countries \"grass-fed\" has become really trendy because their cattle is treat like shit and literally fed chicken shit amongst other things. Intensively farmed beef is the exception in the UK.", "166" ], [ "Touched a nerve did I? \n\nThis particular comment thread was regarding improving animal welfare, and nothing to do with the environment. But since you've decided to take it down that route... I really hate vegans who get preachy about the environment when they take transatlantic flights like yourself. Your diet is not saving the world. You need to do more than be a virtue signalling vegan on Reddit to do that.\n\nWant to know what I do? I pay more for 100% green electricity. I don't own a car. I don't like flights. I use public transport. I spend more money on energy-efficient appliances. I make electronics like computers, TVs, and phones last 5 to 10 years. If they break, they are repaired whenever practical, rather than being dumped and replaced. I am about to start taxing myself by way of having 24 trees planted every year so that, in 30 years time, my entire lifetime's emissions, and much more, will have been sequestered. My carbon footprint is about to be -18 tonnes CO2e (yes negative!) per year *even though I eat meat*. What's your carbon footprint you sanctimonious prick? Don't forget to include your transatlantic flights! I bet you own a car too. What are you actually doing about it because being vegan alone is not enough?\n\n\n > You do know that male chicks from the egg industry are macerated on the day they are born and that free-range means about 13-15 chickens per square metre.\n\nYou know I said this particular thread was about improving animal welfare? Guess what, it's possible: _URL_0_\n\n > You know that the leading cause of unhealthy rivers, ocean dead zones are cattle \"grazing\" as they pollute and kill off local eco systems in rivers, waterways, etc. We have about 15% of healthy rivers in England and Wales because of animal-ag.\n\nYou know fetilisers are used on plants? And this runs off too? Don't just blame it on animals.\n\n > You know that cows burp methane which is a worse contributor to climate change than all of transport combined, including flying.\n\nMost of the figures that put animal agriculture above aviation are based on emissions directly from the plane. They don't consider that emissions at high altitude are twice as damaging than at ground level. They don't consider the entire supply chain, from extracting fossil fuels, to construction and maintenance of the aircraft, to travel to and from airports.\n\nI'm sorry that this doesn't fit with your worldview that you're saving the planet by eating soy, but continuing to jet across the globe on a trail of burnt hydrocarbons.", "909" ], [ "40,000 farms worldwide. My meat doesn't come from the whole world, it comes from the UK. Intensively rearing beef in California by importing soy and using loads of water in a dry climate is going to be far worse than just letting cows graze on a meadow in England eating grass that was naturally watered by rainfall.\n\nAre you just going to ignore the fact I'm eating meat while not destroying the environment?", "166" ], [ "If his numbers are wrong, you're saying our government's numbers are wrong.\n\n > Watch Apocalypse Cow, <PERSON> talks to the dairy industry spokeslady as she's at her farm. She gets a delivery for her \"free range\", \"organic\", dairy cows which consists of Soy, Palm and other imports from what was previously rainforest.\n\nMost cows eat grass. We literally have fields and fields of it for them to eat, and it's free.", "166" ], [ "Yeah it takes quite a bit of work to really get a vegan diet right. So people see healthy vegans who got absolutely obsessed over cooking and nutrition and absolutely nailed the diet, and start spouting that a vegan diet is inherently healthy but ignore the fact that if you obsess about cooking and nutrition with an omnivorous diet you can be equally healthy. \n\nThe reality is that if you go vegan and want to succeed you have to pay much more attention to your nutrition than you would on a standard diet. Problem is we have a nation of people who barely know the difference between protein, fat, and carbohydrate.", "909" ], [ "UK politics really is further left than in the US. I mean you just called a right-wing politician \"liberal\".\n\nIn the UK climate change isn't even a left vs right issue. We don't have any credible politicians denying it exists. You have a president that thinks he can make \"clean coal\" whatever the fuck that is. Both sides acknowledge that the writing is on the wall for humanity unless we do something about it.", "886" ], [ "Well that term can range from \"bricked\" (the correct term) where the firmware is irreversibly damaged and can only be repaired by Apple, thus making the computer as useful as a brick, and \"bricked\" as a lay term for anything that breaks the OS but can be fixed by simply reinstalling. It's not clear yet how \"bricked\" things are. I've seen some people suggesting that wiping the SSD in another Mac will fix it. But I've also seen some people say that Apple said it has to be repaired by them.", "923" ], [ "I said animal welfare can be improved for marginal cost and gave the example of free range eggs. I said not everybody can afford £25. I did not give it as an example of a marginal cost.\n\nYou can improve welfare a little bit my making £5 meat cost £6, or £6.50. That's marginal.\n\nYou can make eggs higher welfare by making them cost just 5-10p more each.", "166" ], [ "Not a lot in the short term. Apple was a relatively small customer and they won't be selling M1 chips to companies would who have bought Intel chips.\n\nAMD is the biggest issue they face as they compete in the same sectors.\n\nLong-term we may see desktop and laptop computers switching to ARM en-masse if other ARM CPU manufacturers can replicate what Apple have achieved. Ultimately these chips will make their way in to servers, and that could be the end of Intel.", "85" ], [ "Best I can do at Aldi:\n\n12 Free Range Eggs - ~£1.69\n\nOnions - ~£0.50\n\n1KG Frozen Broccoli - £0.59 x2 = £1.18\n\n250g Grated Cheddar - £1.60 (can save money grating your own)\n\n500g beef mince - £1.49\n\nTuna in sunflower oil - £0.75\n\nGreek yogurt - £1.29\n\n1.5KG pork shoulder - Under £5\n\n85% dark chocolate, 5 bars - £1.49\n\n£14.99 total\n\nYou'll be able to create a lot of cheese and onion omeletes.\n\nEnough here to get a good 285g of green veg per day. Buy more veg whenever you can stretch to it though. A pack of peppers would add £1.50 but would add extra flavour to omelettes, and go with some onion as a side salad to tuna.\n\nThe pork shoulder is the best thing here. It's super cheap, but if you roast it slowly it's absolutely delicious as pulled pork. As a fatty cut it will give you lots of energy. You should get six meals out of it.\n\nThe mince (20% fat!) you can create various things with, including making your own burgers.\n\nMost days you'll be able to have two treats: some yogurt, and a bit of dark chocolate.\n\nRemember to always buy the fattiest versions of food you can find, like 20% mince and tuna in oil rather than brine. More fat is more energy.", "783" ], [ "No these machines are powerful enough to use as a primary machine. I know lots of developers who use them as a mobile workstation, but also as a desktop replacement hooked up to two monitors. \n\nJust because you don't need two displays doesn't mean other people don't. \n\nAlso you recommending a Mac Mini makes no sense as it now has the same CPU.\n\nAnd recommending a PC is just bizarre if you're an app developer. You really need a Mac and Xcode. Even just web developers prefer to use a Unix OS with commercial software support.", "689" ], [ "Apple don't state their SSD endurance. A 250GB EVO has a warranty of 150TBW and my workload could cause it to write 110TB in just a year. I don't know why you're even quoting Samsung SSDs because it's not possible to replace the SSD in newer Macs - that's my worry. In my current MBP I'm not bothered because everything is backed up and I can just stick in a new NVMe drive when it dies (and it already has once before). I can push my 32GB desktop machine to using swap too. When I buy a new Mac I am not settling for less than 64GB RAM when I can't replace the SSD. 16GB is an absolute joke.", "448" ], [ "This is the most wrong thing I've ever read on Reddit. Apple went out of their way to say these CPUs have the fastest *cores* in the world. That means single core performance. Just wait for benchmarks next week. Some sites are already making an inference based on the A14's insane performance that Apple's claims are extremely plausible.", "85" ], [ "> They argue it would leave the average employee no worse off because of savings made by not commuting and not buying lunch on-the-go and fewer purchases of work clothing. \n\nPlebs with a better work life balance and able to save money? Better take it away from them!\n\n > “A big chunk of people have disconnected themselves from the face-to-face world yet are still leading a full economic life. That means remote workers are contributing less to the infrastructure of the economy whilst still receiving its benefits. That is a big problem for the economy.”\n\nIt talks like they've suddenly stopped paying taxes. Most people have probably just shifted their spending elsewhere. The only thing I save is £65 for a monthly bus ticket. I would continue making lunches at home even if I was in the office.\n\n > Under Deutsche Bank’s proposals, the new tax could also support people who have lost their jobs \n\nThis is why I pay National Insurance!", "786" ], [ "Well Apple did claim these CPUs had the fastest cores in the world, and Anandtech extraoplated the performance of the A14 CPU and concluded that Apple's claim was extremely credible.\n\nThis is Apple's slowest laptop CPU. Imagine what's coming to large MacBook Pros and desktop machines. Sorry PCMR, but this meme was dead before OP posted it.", "85" ], [ "Are you really suggesting Apple rebuilt macOS for ARM, from the ground-up, while continuing to support an identical version of the OS for x86? No, of course not. Most of the code will be exactly the same, with specific tweaks for Apple Silicon Macs. You're a developer, you should know how you can compile for different architectures from the same code base.\n\n > The multitasking that you are talking about is not a real multitasking\n\nmacOS is a fully multi-tasking operating system, based on BSD. You have no idea what you're talking about.", "689" ], [ "That makes no sense. Apple creates APIs. Their own apps use their own APIs. They optimise the APIs for a new architecture, and all of their existing apps get compiled using the right APIs for the architecture. That's how easy it is for Apple, and that's how easy it has been for developers to port to Apple Silicon. For the majority, they just open their project in Xcode and recompile and it all just works. Apple made this easy years ago by completely dropping 32bit support and dozens of legacy APIs. You can bet they've been working on this transition ever since they started making their own chips. \n\n > So, yes, Apple wrote it from 0 or used the iPad Os as base\n\nNo, what are you talking about? macOS is for Macs and always has been. iPad OS is based on macOS, not the other way around. They didn't take iPad OS and turn it back in to macOS for Apple Silicon Macs. macOS was already ready for it. It is literally the same operating system.", "689" ], [ "Please explain your reasoning.\n\nThese chips have a lower TDP than the outgoing Intel chips, and their performance per watt is far, far higher. They use the same cooling solution in the MacBook Pro as they did for the Intel chip.\n\nTherefore these CPUs can handle much heavier tasks, all while using less power, and therefore generating less heat.", "85" ], [ "Incorrect.\n\nMacBook Air - no fan\n\nMac Mini - fan\n\nMacBook Pro - fan\n\nI think the active cooling solution will be more than enough to sustain full performance of a low TDP chip, considering the same cooling solutions were designed for much higher TDP Intel chips.\n\nEven if the M1 gets throttled, it will almost certainly still be faster than the outgoing Intel chips running at full speed.", "81" ], [ "No that's not what's being asked.\n\nThe new MacBook Air supports one external display. They're asking if they close the lid for it to drive two external displays.\n\nYour MacBook Air supports two external displays. So of course you can close the lid and use one display.\n\nNo Mac has ever let you close the lid and gain an *extra* external display.", "689" ], [ "The major difference is the operating system. So no. You might as well ask does the M1 chip make the MacBook a glorified Raspberry Pi?\n\nAlso:\n\n > Now that the RAM is part of the chip, the new Macbook lineup will not let you upgrade the RAM in the future. If you buy a Macbook with 8GB of RAM you’re stuck with 8GB until you buy a new machine.\n\nThis has been the case for a very long time with MacBooks. At least seven years.", "689" ], [ "That doesn't even matter. You said:\n\n > I use the internal display and two external displays with my 2013 Macbook Air FFS.\n\nThat doesn't change the fact they can only use one external display. Closing the lid is just an obvious mechanism for telling macOS you want to switch off the internal display in favour of an external one.", "689" ], [ "> From a performance standpoint, the new Apple M1 MacBooks do fairly well considering that they are using a complete processor based around the ARM instruction set. But compared to a typical desktop workstation from Puget Systems that is around 2-3x faster on average (albeit at a higher cost), they certainly can't keep up.\n\nYes a 10W passively cooled chip in a laptop can't keep up with AMD's best 105W 16-core desktop chip cooled by an enormous heatsink and fan.\n\n*How very surprising*", "127" ], [ "Just a little correction but they were only to measure power draw at the wall and admitted they actually don't know what the TDP is. \n\nAlso most CPUs can increase their TDP if they turbo. Quoted TDP is always nominal TDP. A 125W 10900k can draw 200W from the board, with a much higher figure from the wall once overall system power consumption is added.", "121" ], [ "Yeah it's so broken. I don't need a strong GPU for my work, so one of the things that excites me most about the M1 is that even the most basic slowest iGPU in the lineup as more than enough power to smoothly drive a nice 5K or even 6K display for desktop usage. Current Intel iGPUs such as the one in the Mac Mini technically support 5K output but it's sluggish and horrible.", "689" ], [ "It's embarassing how Apple release these Pro machines and then just abandon them. I mean the non-Pro iMac is better for most use cases now. The 10-core i9 slaughters the 10-core and 14-core Xeon options for a fraction of the price. It now has a 10Gb networking option. It supports up to 128GB RAM which is enough for a huge range of applications. Unless you were really desperate for 256GB RAM in an iMac form factor, or really needed an 18-core Xeon which is only 20% faster than the i9, *why on Earth would you buy it for twice the price*? Honestly I think being Space Grey is a bigger selling point than anything else.", "689" ], [ "Sure but the only Apple chip so far is the M1 which is an ultra-low power mobile chip. It's not reasonable to expect M1 to compete with Ryzen 5000 chips on multi-core considering they're desktop chips with ten times the power budget, and cooling systems that can expel lots of head from a relatively large chassis.\n\nThe fact M1 can do what it does while drawing less power than some LED light bulbs... wow it's impressive. Really impressive.", "85" ], [ "I already cancelled Christmas this year. It's not happening. BBC News right now is reporting that people can mix from the 24th December for a short amount of time. How the hell am I meant to get a train on Christmas Eve? Even if possible it will be absolute chaos. Not only that but LNER have already emailed me saying travel until 3rd January will have significant disruption, including delays and cancelled services, due to Network Rail carrying out maintenance... over the fucking Christmas period 🤦🏻‍♂️", "691" ], [ "> But Apple doesn’t call it a “fan”. They call it an “active cooling system”. That sounds like a marketing euphemism, but it’s not fair to call this a “fan”. It is something else altogether, and nothing at all like the cooling systems in any previous Mac laptop.\n\n > I’ve never once heard it in an entire week.\n\n\nUmm... what? It's exactly the same. You don't hear the fan on an idling Intel system either. The cooling system is no different. The difference is the chip being cooled doesn't need much air to keep it cool, so the fan never has to ramp up.", "81" ], [ "Chrome for Linux and Chrome for Windows will have a lot of different code to work with the underlying OS and the APIs it provides. It's not always as simple as pushing compile. The ARM version of Windows depracted a huge amount of old APIs, some of which Chrome might be using. If that's the case, then they can't just click compile for ARM, they'd have to do a lot of work which I guess they think isn't worth their time due to the low uptake of ARM Windows.\n\nOn macOS, Apple got developers to do the hard work a few years back when they dropped 32bit support and a load of old APIs. All current Mac apps will be using APIs that are available on Big Sur on an M1 Mac, so in a lot of cases it really is as simple as recompiling.", "684" ], [ "It's currently not even possible. This will only happen if Microsoft releases the ARM version of Windows to the general public. Currently it's only available to OEMs. If that happens then for best results Apple will need to create Bootcamp for Apple Silicon Macs. Even if Microsoft does this, the Windows apps you like to use may not even be available.\n\nFor running Windows on a Mac your best hope is for a virtual machine with an x86 emulator, but none exist yet. If you're lucky, you may see something in the next year, but you will be disappointed with the performance.\n\nIf you want to run Windows natively on an Apple Silicon Mac, I think you're in for a very long wait and the day may never come.", "689" ], [ "Did anybody else thing the CGI scenes for Federation HQ were a blurry mess? Could hardly make out anything. Seems to be extremel common for scenes to be rendered like this in Discovery. Shows where ships are clear and detailed include: The Mandalorian, The Expanse, and The Orville. Why can't Star Trek go back to the clean look of TNG, with long, slow shots of the ships?", "571" ] ]
508
[ 12097, 7514, 6638, 421, 3323, 6362, 5687, 13500, 1949, 15970, 3271, 18281, 18260, 10433, 22767, 23258, 2487, 17518, 20482, 4205, 23259, 773, 25185, 5968, 9693, 19649, 8739, 12096, 8628, 12561, 4366, 24056, 18728, 1649, 642, 5651, 18358, 12132, 22542, 8116, 25125, 18235, 19220, 9435, 15545, 9161, 8016, 5185, 13526, 16014, 17881, 15737, 10579, 10610, 889, 21256, 13729, 24745, 22702, 19200, 3363, 19178, 25094, 18182, 21295, 9582, 19609, 4973, 20523, 14689, 8939, 25449, 8273, 5792, 5322, 18772, 23992, 7086, 16629, 25019, 10055, 13413, 15787, 1710, 7671, 5292, 22352, 10815, 19173, 19127, 15576, 24027, 11022, 12534, 12598, 24699, 17506, 8221, 25468, 24855, 9239, 16787, 16237, 25318, 4721, 16636, 4395, 18312, 1259, 1935, 3478, 3942, 17213, 15102, 1240, 17636, 5088, 5596, 8390, 16327, 10573, 7821, 19285, 4618, 13289, 11473, 17588, 18274, 15021, 20013, 11351, 750, 24060, 3811, 16328, 10149, 22516, 17642, 24406, 19263, 8940, 14911, 19462, 3544, 6336, 21832, 17161, 10281, 7400, 24787, 1283, 14138, 1239, 9138, 18641, 21397, 6022, 11093, 9140, 22196, 7865, 10023, 1185, 15094, 8567, 13834, 20114, 11425, 12433, 25262, 7104, 13028, 19109, 11913, 9497, 24538, 18636, 12612, 10557, 20649, 19894, 23812, 12315, 10555, 23694, 12144, 18623, 17225, 4915, 17720, 14308, 22034, 24529, 1317, 21711, 16459, 18512, 1273, 2347, 2263, 13967, 15014, 25306, 16401, 82, 18271, 3332, 7393, 21219, 16102, 20567, 15426, 1452, 16448, 5505, 24424, 23710, 10047, 2675, 19293, 18705, 18775, 15324, 11336, 10262, 15007, 14241, 13390, 21120, 4681, 4981, 20844, 20652, 18539, 6406, 2820, 122, 19641, 4826, 19861, 20602, 386, 2135, 10027, 25200, 8247, 8470, 4474, 13199, 18390, 6429, 2223, 10337, 24642, 20991, 2241, 17610, 10483, 21029, 10272, 8196, 15507, 20507, 2335, 21433, 5590, 3853, 1512, 24230, 8996, 16180, 20442, 22816, 11594, 6787, 19831, 20528, 23086, 18756, 150, 20419, 13722, 11110, 21607, 1983, 14118, 227, 6990, 24836, 21090, 1928, 15540, 7108, 16795, 20463, 8001, 18044, 18841, 15614, 12817, 11257, 14954, 5920, 6087, 6514, 11755, 17145, 14143, 4027, 10188, 13746, 6219, 23907, 11398, 10593, 8655, 1451, 16208, 8851, 23740, 8052, 23581, 9296, 23101, 414, 8058, 4838, 22798, 23743, 11725, 2681, 10040, 7509, 9706, 2282, 11837, 24719, 25230, 22519, 12159, 21855, 5966, 7036, 21500, 21115, 4347, 3851, 4072, 5062, 11699, 3891, 6680, 7766, 17874, 17372, 4762, 11422, 20942, 4430, 10402, 5553, 23150, 23894, 2530, 4378, 7119, 23324, 24169, 22692, 19821, 24238, 4353, 11099, 3019, 16010, 21067, 1079, 15398, 3955, 18333, 5272, 23159, 15229, 14064, 16307, 7385, 13482, 19897, 5693, 3774, 13005, 14177, 15535, 24962, 14609, 7561, 17523, 14004, 12424, 13077, 23827, 25452, 22930, 16258, 15288, 11182, 20828, 37, 16812, 578, 16293, 4509, 112, 20483, 1708, 22528, 23807, 16885, 13380, 17501, 20312, 13794, 5566, 22069, 835, 17950, 19175, 7608, 22378, 12938, 22268, 13889, 7520, 8916, 25014, 8777, 4015, 22784, 4647, 2275, 22117, 13802, 3835, 8180, 6040, 11280, 15689, 23928, 24201, 22014, 143, 18776, 15310, 12601, 3321, 15343, 7926, 9920, 14604, 10186, 13407, 16019, 18400, 3537, 17258, 3622, 4377, 11355, 9717, 13118, 18807, 20830, 7155, 24989, 5453, 1987, 17271, 1931, 11191, 11813, 11805, 20510, 2420, 17459, 3257, 4830, 11721, 4483, 7499, 21394, 4441, 5301, 22967, 7331, 3633, 18898, 25206, 9082, 20925 ]
reddit_dump_010011100000
[ [ "<PERSON> said the $600 would be raised to $2000. That was what the Democrats were trying to pass in congress and what <PERSON> promised would pass if the Dems won the senate. By the time the Democrats had the majority the $600 cheques had already started to go out, so they couldn't change the value of those and instead are adding an additional $1400 as a second cheque. For those keeping count at home, $1400 + $600 = $2000, the promised amount\n\n > Biden could easily, with a stroke of his pen, send out checks.\n\nActually no, he couldn't. Only congress has the power to do that", "332" ], [ "> A communist state, also known as a Marxist–Leninist state, is a one-party state that is administered and governed by a communist party guided by Marxism–Leninism [...] These parties are usually Marxist–Leninist or some national variation thereof such as Maoism or Titoism, with the official aim of achieving socialism and progressing toward a communist society. [...] As a term, communist state is used by Western historians, political scientists and media to refer to these countries and distinguish them from other socialist states.\n\n_URL_0_", "534" ], [ "Well, no, Nazi Germany isn't called a socialist state. It's in the name, sure, but no historian or political scientist describes it as one. Because it doesn't fit the definition. In contrast, the USSR does fit the definition of a communist state, despite communist state not being in the name, so it's called one. For source, scroll up 2 comments where I link the Wikipedia article that explains what a communist state is and lists the USSR as one.\n\nThe key here, that you may be missing because you're too busy arguing to read, is that \"communist state\" does not mean \"state that is communist\". As I've said many times, the USSR was socialist and not communist - those two not being the same thing - but was a communist *state* because it was a one-party socialist state run by a Marxist-Leninist party. That's the definition of communist state. If you have a problem with that definition take it up with political scientists, not me.", "534" ], [ "It doesn't matter if they're on different scales because you're looking at the trends, not the actual prices. Obviously 7 bananas isn't going to cost the same as a SuperBowl ad. That's not what you're looking at. You're looking to see if the price of bananas rises in conjunction with the price of SuperBowl ads.\n\nThe scale chosen isn't arbitrary or \"not corrected\", its chosen to fit the heights of the two graphs. Putting them on the same scale would just give you a yellow line on the x axis.", "185" ], [ "> Except now they can bounce that fee up with no relation to your property tax\n\nThe city can already raise the fees collected for the fire department\n\n > Publically funded services should not cost extra to the public. Whether that's a monthly fee or the bus fare.\n\nBut they do, via taxes. Which are a fee paid monthly (or whatever period). There's no difference between saying \"you need to pay $1000 property tax and $200 fire department fee\" or \"you need to pay $1200 property tax, $200 of which will be used to fund the fire department\"", "322" ], [ "Sure, you could pick the number of bananas to show them in one scale. But the graph would look identical and you don't gain any thing. Because, again, you're not comparing the price of bananas to ads, you're comparing the price of bananas in 2020 to the price of bananas in 1980, and similarly with ads. And for that the scale doesn't matter. \n\n In fact you would *lose* meaning by scaling it like that, because people know that $2 for 7 bananas is expensive, but you have to do conversions to know what a reasonable price for 1.859 million bananas is. Or you make it a round number and then the heights don't match and it's impossible to compare the relative price changes", "618" ], [ "> If you want to use a banana for scale to better understand how prices for the Super Bowl have increased you could increase the already silly 7 bananas (why not just use 1 as that would make more sense for what you say) to 10,000,000 or even 15,000,000\n\nI agree 1 (or 1 lb) is better than 7, but 7 is still better than 15,000,000. You don't gain anything by making it 15,000,000 bananas and you lose the intuition for what's expensive or cheap \n\n > . “Oh wow, in 2008 Super Bowl ads were the same price as 15,000,000 bananas.”\n\nBut that's not the point of the graph. It's to show the changes in prices, not how many bananas a SuperBowl ad costs\n\n > Even better than that though would be to just eliminate dollars as the measure and convert it to bananas.\n\nThis is the worst suggestion of all, because you wouldn't be able to tell if a change in the plot is because of a change in the price of bananas or a change in the price of ads", "618" ], [ "That's not how patents work. You can be granted a new patent for a small change, but the old patent doesn't get extended and people are free to use it once it expires, same as always. And you *can* buy generic insulin for not much more than the $15 quoted above ($25 in Walmart). It's not medically recommended, because it turns out those small changes make a big difference, and modern insulin is much safer and much more effective than even the 25 year old designs.", "618" ], [ "Because that patent is 100 years old and medicine has come a long way since then. You don't even need to go back to the original patent; you can buy generic insulin for cheap at Walmart, made with a formula from ~30 years ago since the patent covering it has expired. But even that is much less safe and less effective than modern insulin, so it's not medically recommended unless you have absolutely no way to afford anything better", "764" ], [ "This is a non-story. In Israel you are not required to be present for the entire trial and the court can let you be absent for parts of it. <PERSON> was required to appear for the duration of the opening hearings, and he did. It's not like he stood up halfway through and said \"this is bullshit I'm out\". He did what was legally required and left when the court said they were done with him and he could go. He will be required to show up again for certain parts, but there's no point in making him sit there silently while his lawyers argue the case", "12" ], [ "Well there was also the whole kerfuffle of shady backroom deals involving bribes and threats to become appointed chancellor, and then physically barring representatives from entering the Reichstag while other members voted on whether to give him more power. Not really a standard part of Israeli elections\n\nAnd again, tons of leaders never win a majority of legislative seats? So what? Why bring <PERSON> into this? Canada's PM currently has a minority mandate. Are you going to say that <PERSON> came to power the same way as <PERSON>?", "207" ], [ "Stuff will fall even if the kinetic energy doesn't eventually decrease. For example, if its a valley with another hill on the other side (and no friction) the ball will endlessly go back and forth between the two hills, energy being transferred back and forth between potential and kinetic. Or if it's an infinite hill, the ball will keep falling forever.\n\nThis explanation requires that the object knows it will eventually lose that kinetic energy by coming to a stop at the bottom of a hill, which is nonesense", "792" ], [ "Yes that's generally true. Later courses are considered more important, and admissions boards also look at trends in your grades. If you started off poorly but improved and had a very strong final year, it shows them that you have been improving your study skills and although overall your grades are low, you're now at a point where you are ready for the program. The catch there, however, is that you have to get your application considered by a person first. If the overall GPA is too low or the number of fails too high some schools may unfortunately automatically reject the application without considering it further. But as long as you meet their cutoffs, strong upper year grades and reference letters will make up for a bad start.", "154" ], [ "If you define the potential energy by -grad(U) = F then forces point in the direction of decreasing potential. You need the minus sign there in order to keep total energy conserved; if you tried to say F = grad(U) so that forces point in the direction of *increasing* potential you wouldn't have the T + U is conserved, so this definition doesn't really make sense as an energy. \n\nBut ultimately it's just an observation about how nature tends to behave without any deeper insight into why. People noticed that objects fall towards earth and opposite charges come towards eachother, gaining speed and therefore kinetic energy as they do, and invented the concept of potential energy to make the math describing that look nice. Rather unsatisfyingly, you could say that bodies try to decrease potential energy because potential energy is defined as the thing that bodies try to decrease.", "792" ], [ "Because a lot of the economy still relies on the oil industry. And while a planned transition to renewable sources with investment in green sectors will protect from economic fallout, its very easy to make it sound like <PERSON> is going to kill the industry on day 1 and everyone that relies on it is going to be out of a job. What he said was a no brainer but it's a mistake to say something that can be taken out of context like that. Anyone that just hears <PERSON> say \"I'm going to get rid of oil\" isn't hearing \"were going to switch from oil to renewables and you'll have a job there instead\", they're hearing \"your job is at risk\" \n\nIt's the same reason <PERSON> keeps hitting <PERSON> on fracking, even though <PERSON> has made it clear he's going to regulate and slowly move away from fracking, not ban it. He's waiting for the soundbite of <PERSON> slipping up and saying \"we're going to get rid of fracking\" that he can cut the \"in 30 years after everyone in the industry has a job in greener energies\" out of and use as an argument in states that rely on fracking", "771" ], [ "If literally all you ate was butter you would indeed lose weight, because you'd be dead. But no, ketosis does not automatically make you lose weight. You're right that low carb diets can be more successful for some people because they find it easier to keep calories in control, but an excess of calories on a purely fat diet will still make you gain weight", "978" ], [ "No, the point of separation is that the government can't force you to follow or not follow a specific religion, and that The Church can't make the laws. But there's nothing saying that the people can't vote in religious representatives who are members of a church. In fact the constitution expressly makes it clear that no public servant can be denied office because of their religion. And if a religious person is in office you can't stop them from basing their personal beliefs on their religion, since that's again protected by freedom of religion.\n\nAs long as the laws aren't actually infringing on people's freedom of religion, the constitution doesn't say anything about religiously motivated laws. In fact it protects them, since forbidding it would be a gross violation of said freedom of religion.", "165" ], [ "Low carb diets can work for people, but really only because they find it easier to maintain a healthy diet. Keto is a whole other story - the weight loss benefits of ketosis are unknown, as are the potential health risks. Assuming people on \"keto\" actually go into ketosis, which they rarely do.\n\nBut mostly the keto diet (and any other fad diet, tok be fair) is surrounding by a cloud of bullshit broscience and I wanted to see some memes about it", "978" ], [ "If there was a legitimate religion where the right to abortion was a religious belief, then generally it would probably be unconstitutional for the federal government to outright ban abortion, though they could restrict it. Although with abortion, while obviously religiously motivated, the actual argument against it is based on the idea that the baby should considered a living person with rights after week x. If you accept that then freedom of religion doesn't protect your right to an abortion anymore. You can't say killing people is part of your religion, for example.", "674" ], [ "Yes, that's what I said. Ketosis requires incredibly low carb intake for a sustained period of time and it seems like most people on a keto diet don't actually go into ketosis, at least not for very long\n\nAnd again, if keto works for you its only because you find it easier to eat less calories on a low carb diet. Any other benefits of low carb diet (while certainly there) are much smaller factors. There's nothing really special about keto other than some people find it easier to stick to\n\nAlso, I question your claim that keto works so well compared to others. It's not been shown to be particularly more successful than any other type of diet", "978" ], [ "Probably not. You couldn't get the leader of the Jedi order to say a child doesn't have the right to life until they're 5 years old, for example. While it might religiously motivated, the legal argument about when a person is considered a person would not be a religious one.\n\nBTW, I'm not a lawyer so if you really want to understand this issue more completely you should ignore everything I've said and go read some books on constitutional law", "151" ], [ "You're not guaranteed to eat much less. If you were then every single person would succeed in their diet, which is obviously untrue. You might be more likely to eat less, but that's not the same as a guarantee. \n\nAlso, that's the whole point of a low carb diet. Keto specifically has a different point, one not yet proven to be beneficial\n\nAlso also, it's not so successful. Keto hasn't been shown to be particularly more successful than other diets", "978" ], [ "> So you don't even understand how keto works, and are not familiar with individuals success stories? You need a study to tell you water is wet?\n\nYes, because that's how science works. Knowing a few people that lost weight on keto doesn't prove keto is the perfect diet. I'm well aware it can work; what's not so obvious, and what isn't stated in either of those two links, is that keto is significantly better than other diets for weight loss", "978" ], [ "It may not be ok, but separation of church and state doesn't forbid it, nor could it without eroding individual freedoms. If a legislator is allowed to say \"my parents taught me that gay people are equal therefore I think they should be able to get married\", they can also say \"my parents taught me that <PERSON> said marriage is between man and women therefore I think gay people shouldn't be able to get married\". To say otherwise would be tantamount to the government saying \"you can only hold office if you have these specific religious beliefs\", which is an egregious violation of religious freedom.\n\nAnd of course a judge should never base a decision on their religion over the law, which is why gay people *can* get married. But that's not the same as saying a religious person can't be a politician or that a politician isn't allowed to exercise their religious beliefs while in office.", "165" ], [ "A black hole is not a very dense lump of matter. In general relativity, a black hole has a singularity surrounded by an event horizon. There is no lump of mass - all of the mass is concentrated in the singularity. There are some sense in which a black hole might be considered to have a boundary. For example the photon sphere or similar concept can be considered as the a boundary since it defines some limit, like where you can have an orbit or where you'll see a shadow. But they're just specific distances where some interesting behaviour happens - there's no physical border there. The event horizon can be considered as a boundary but again there's nothing physically there. You could hypothetically cross over the event horizon and never even know it.", "576" ], [ "It's ambiguous. Some people consider that multiplication and division should always be done left to right, so 8 / 2(2+2) = (8/2) x (2+2) = 16. Others consider that everything on the otherside of the division sign is considered part of the denominator, so multiplication takes precedence and 8 / 2(2+2) = 8 / (2(2+2)) = 1. \n\nYou should avoid writing expressions like this by using brackets [eg 8 / (2(2+2))], reordering terms [eg 8(2+2) / 2] or replacing division with multiplication of a reciprocal [eg 8 x (1/2) x (2+2)]", "87" ] ]
142
[ 25073, 16666, 6990, 24962, 10775, 13059, 24060, 23614, 15498, 19220, 8773, 184, 3133, 14821, 19312, 13120, 21090, 24072, 7348, 12860, 11412, 3809, 23977, 22117, 16387, 25253, 11359, 24206, 869, 15670, 822, 25442, 270, 5653, 2403, 20902, 24729, 8248, 19292, 20286, 13288, 7187, 12000, 3932, 4055, 16015, 12867, 1857, 1993, 10063, 201, 1095, 23764, 13380, 25306, 15882, 7709, 1881, 13573, 18044, 17676, 9614, 17931, 18031, 17818, 4774, 16628, 22235, 2690, 9370, 14391, 1223, 16869, 319, 13530, 16609, 367, 12725, 11398, 16960, 15404, 22886, 3089, 21890, 18265, 18640, 3786, 7865, 21751, 6987, 3332, 1079, 10362, 22816, 4875, 24424, 22631, 10959, 18024, 5519, 17126, 19537, 19760, 25541, 22103, 15615, 3503, 21120, 23588, 5824, 14276, 25371, 22714, 21493, 5610, 16987, 24009, 10836, 8993, 22519, 25529, 8795, 7944, 10281, 4731, 12038, 12598, 22424, 499, 9191, 24368, 20409, 17300, 9939, 10390, 21219, 18333, 24948, 12869, 15968, 3593, 15992, 8284, 20437, 8058, 19880, 18738, 22828, 23278, 22589, 19831, 19248, 12650, 1756, 18182, 15500, 1738, 17821, 3286, 21293, 9450, 15254, 12096, 7645, 10697, 7671, 10724, 13908, 7003, 16115, 6259, 8764, 5338, 17424, 1193, 3811, 10034, 18234, 18718, 6082, 9501, 18272, 9228, 5542, 18499, 16744, 16313, 17970, 21433, 14111, 1229, 19285, 5018, 24836, 5169, 7036, 4430, 16830, 10519, 17950, 17826, 9361, 16286, 143, 6403, 7629, 7278, 4165, 25021, 22567, 12744, 11922, 1560, 2176, 3019, 13299, 1477, 8617, 23291, 9762, 4499, 10996, 7104, 16499, 1317, 5988, 8045, 3297, 19293, 25533, 18881, 24854, 32, 5443, 18477, 18687, 13613, 20942, 5689, 3757, 18301, 2832, 1635, 21643, 16611, 8528, 13179, 5505, 21210, 23124, 16844, 1535, 22378, 4163, 9920, 14294, 11203, 18447, 15223, 4378, 11280, 13583, 9703, 1781, 3330, 18067, 22027, 16523, 20858, 61, 18735, 23533, 22542, 6499, 24083, 676, 15985, 8783, 12043, 6969, 15979, 16244, 21884, 13930, 3699, 19559, 4161, 24792, 23653, 6731, 25317, 12267, 17154, 14609, 20893, 10027, 24593, 16495, 6018, 7999, 24503, 11386, 17739, 14004, 8470, 17997, 15133, 11805, 5173, 16149, 3698, 16120, 15105, 21213, 15950, 11863, 8674, 17599, 12345, 7695, 8544, 7561, 12793, 2849, 20983, 19389, 5968, 17056, 12072, 2694, 18167, 4821, 17708, 18523, 18618, 2686, 25130, 23655, 23985, 12462, 12772, 18274, 22506, 6850, 16614, 2086, 339, 2624, 12660, 11422, 11831, 15441, 2538, 11177, 8249, 9296, 23767, 14597, 18250, 4271, 20147, 5192, 18690, 11522, 21148, 3028, 22964, 15912, 14524, 6402, 17058, 18807, 9410, 18974, 14906, 4353, 4590, 21859, 2675, 23071, 24139, 4487, 14657, 23239, 13453, 13729, 14896, 24228, 12877, 21394, 14546, 5359, 15420, 12601, 6397, 16412, 13077, 5155, 11056, 11571, 19656, 8519, 10467, 4278, 25483, 12359, 16803, 12159, 12902, 3271, 7704, 11565, 20279, 19779, 3279, 6734, 5385, 11789, 3774, 7870, 11551, 7524, 11589, 752, 3721, 13687, 25125, 16865, 24303, 21060, 18069, 6336, 20436, 19148, 23826, 13834, 2225, 23164, 2972, 9789, 17541, 12493, 4703, 19526, 13861, 18756, 12479, 21515, 9389, 1059, 19484, 1248, 19004, 8221, 21834, 11323, 9606, 3964, 5185, 1948, 24507, 10684, 16192, 6169, 19850, 4464, 6369, 5209, 16014, 19329, 1499, 5063, 9726, 20530, 479, 9684, 17417, 9933, 12391, 17547, 18624, 23812, 8509, 16348, 19380, 736, 17881, 1045, 19234, 8052, 6873, 15014, 8558, 1456, 12561, 3768, 12212, 8836, 14214 ]
reddit_dump_037_Engineering
[ [ "Are you american? <PERSON> worked for the NSA. The NSA was breaking constitutional law by illegally listening to private phone calls and illegally obtaining private emails. <PERSON>, the former head of the NSA told congress that the NSA does not spy on americans in america. <PERSON> released documents proving <PERSON> was lying to Congress and that the NSA was spying on american citizens illegally (its illegal because the 4th amendment states that the federal government may not obtain personal private information without a warrant) *without* a warrant. That process is called search and seizure. The NSA broke the law and <PERSON> outed them for it.", "776" ], [ "> An FBI review of communications between Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. and President <PERSON>’s national security adviser did not produce any incriminating evidence, The Washington Post reported Monday night.\n\nand\n\n > According to the Post, the calls in question were obtained by the FBI as part of routine surveillance of Russian officials in the U.S., and the review was conducted in late December. <PERSON> is not the target of an investigation, the Post reported.\n\nIm a democrat and this hysteria is getting ridiculous.", "860" ], [ "this is why I shared that article. I am a Democrat and I am sick of \"my side\" acting like our shit doesnt stink. Its stuff like this that leads some to say \"both sides are the same\". However misguided that statement may be, this is the kind of thing that leads people to think that. And *depending on what topics are of the most importance to you*, \"both sides are the same\" may not be as far off the mark as many would like to think.\n\nConsider that the brother and the father were *both* american citizens and neither accused of or convicted of anything, yet the president ordered the fathers death.", "856" ], [ "> IN 2010, PRESIDENT <PERSON> directed the CIA to assassinate an American citizen in Yemen, <PERSON>, **despite the fact that he had never been charged with (let alone convicted of) any crime**, and the agency successfully carried out that order a year later with a September 2011 drone strike. While that assassination created widespread debate — the once-again-beloved ACLU sued <PERSON> to restrain him from the assassination on the ground of due process and then, when that suit was dismissed, sued <PERSON> again after the killing was carried out \n\nI gave you an upvote, but I dont think what you said is entirely accurate.", "819" ], [ "Sure, I might write a Wikipedia page on a guy I just killed without due process too. Everything on that page is \"alleged\" or merely tangential. 9/11 hijackers went to a mosque he preached in. So? They also flew American Airlines, should we drone strike AA for their association with *19* hijackers? The fact is this was an american citizen that was never charged and sentenced to death overseas. The ACLU, which has been viewed quite favorably this past week, fought <PERSON> on the issue in court *twice*.", "690" ], [ "Did this guy throw a molotov? Or did he have a world view you disagree with? He didn't shoot anyone. You are making false equivalence to weapons. The guy had a philosophy, that is not illegal. You are saying that if a DAPL protester went to Yemen, the US could drone that protester. There is a constitution and the fact that US citizens are advocating the dismantling of their own protections from the government is so fucking irritating.", "399" ], [ "> Leaks are illegal and are hated by those in power (and their followers) precisely because political officials want to hide evidence of their own wrongdoing, and want to be able to lie to the public with impunity and without detection. That’s the same reason the rest of us should celebrate such illegal leaks, and protect those who do them, often at great risk to their own interests, so that we can be informed about the real actions of those who wield the greatest power. That principle does not change based upon which political party controls the White House.", "298" ], [ "I dont mean to take that side, it certainly appears nefarious. But is it outside the realm of possibility that the transition team would be in contact with Russia especially considering the \"vitriol\" (probably the wrong word and I dont mean to imply it is unjustified) through the campaign and transition? Could they *not* be acting in bad faith? Please, I just want an answer, down vote if you want think this question is about talking points. I know less about this issue than I want to, that is all. Thanks.", "860" ], [ "Yeah they do. They just dont necessarily have all the information or the room to publish it or it doesn't fit their agenda. If the NYT could have done a WL like drop involving <PERSON> tax returns they would have if it were necessary. The innocent be damned.\n\nEdit: You should read into this thread. u/blarfk Acknowledges he lied and made up facts and refuses to edit the higher up posts where he lied repeatedly. Stating:\n\n > [I think I'll just let people read on our conversation and decide for themselves what they think of my point, minor example in my error aside.](_URL_0_)\n\n/r/quityourbullshit.", "624" ], [ "> The NYT and other major news operations operate under pretty strict journalist ethics. They have never and would not publish the hacked contents of civilians personal e-mails.\n\nThey have published stolen personal information on civilians. Trumps tax records being among them. What you are saying they wouldnt do, they did within the last 3 months very publicly. The \"ethics\" you are attributing to NYT and denying WL are the same.", "452" ], [ "Then make your edit. Your post *still* says\n\n > They have never and would not publish the hacked contents of civilians personal e-mails.\n\nThe NYT published the Pentagon Papers. The WaPo published Watergate. They should do those things. Otherwise innocent people were hurt as a result of those publications. But they should *still* publish those things. Why are you arguing that the US citizens should never have heard about WG? Or the Pentagon Papers? Why do you think those things should never have been published? Why do you think the NYT shouldnt have published <PERSON> tax records?", "452" ], [ "> Also, if you want to get technical, nobody \"hacked\" anyone to get <PERSON>'s tax returns. They were supplied to the NYT by an anonymous source who many people suspect belongs(ed) to <PERSON>'s accounting team and who had legitimate access to them.\n\nStill the same argument as WL. In fact the *exact same argument*. The emails were (as claimed by WL) a *leak* from insiders and not hacked. The ODNI report simply says that Russia hacked the DNC. It does not say that Russia supplied WL with the emails. <PERSON> himself said that they dont know if Russia supplied WL.", "169" ], [ "> But never every publication ever operates on the assumption that all information is fair game.\n\nWe are talking about what is fair game. All information is fair game. Not all information is relevant. When you are using a newspaper for comparison to an exclusively online publication, the limit for articles and data is lower. There is a limit to how much can actually be printed. If they could do more they would, look ath their own online presence to see how they expand. And will continue to expand. They already failed your litmus test in publishing illegally obtained personal information about a private citizen. They would do more if they could. And they will. They also covered the Panama Papers. Tax records are not an isolated incident.", "624" ], [ "\"Skepticism\" and the weakness of your flawed perception of reality through the senses and what can you ever *truly* know is true is a pretty major thread running through all of history. Much had been reasoned out and is the reason <PERSON> said \"I think therefore I am\". But the post above saying you \"can't actually ever know\" is arguably more factual than \"France is in Europe\", at least according to Skeptics and some Empiricists.", "1019" ], [ "> <PERSON> had a show on RT so he literally worked for the Russian government.\n\n<PERSON> had a show that RT aired. There is a huge difference. <PERSON> never worked for TBS.\n\n > There are plenty of other potential conflicts of interest to list\n\nBetween <PERSON> and Russia? I havent heard any. But Id be willing to.\n\n > having literally worked for the sinister entity in question\n\nWhy was Russia so benign when <PERSON> met with Russia in 2014? 2015?\n\nI'm sorry, I'm a democrat and a self described conspiracy theorist - so I have my mind open about Russia hacking being a possibility. I still think this is CYA from the DNC.", "860" ], [ "I think of it as two separate parts of life. At 18 you have mastered being a child. And you are 0 years an adult. When you hit 30 think of it like being 10-12 years old again and how much of the world of children you had mastered by that time. At thirty you have an understanding of adulthood as much as a 12 year old has an understanding of childhood. You think you know sooo much and that you have all this experience and what really keeps happening over and over is you learn how little you ever knew.", "881" ], [ "Its media that is flatly designed to \"influence the electorate\" with an incredibly one-sided bias. It is incredibly hypocritical to give such criticism meanwhile the left has littered these DailyShow \"satellites\" through out the media-sphere that literally push an incredibly one-sided political bias with an obvious agenda. I dont think either are wrong, by the way. It is the easiest way to get sincere (if not exactly truthful) information on the other side of the aisle. <PERSON> isnt going to tell you what is wrong with the Democrats, Fox isnt going to tell you the full truth about what is going on with the Republicans.", "6" ], [ "HyperNormalization.\n\nThe left thinks \"Fake News\" cost them the election so they are doubling down under the guise of \"fighting fire with fire\" and fairly soon there will be little left of truth in media. \n\nSince we're all cool with BuzzFeed around here:\n\n_URL_1_\n\n > The new law would give sweeping powers to the government to push television, radio, newspaper, and social media onto the U.S. public. “It removes the protection for Americans,” says a Pentagon official who is concerned about the law. “It removes oversight from the people who want to put out this information. **There are no checks and balances. No one knows if the information is accurate, partially accurate, or entirely false.”**\n\n_URL_0_", "840" ], [ "> He shouldn't have held that catastrophically idiotic press conference.\n\nI am very appreciative of your logical consistency calling his July press conference \"idiotic\". \n\n > <PERSON> is either an incompetent or malicious jackass. There are no other options at this point.\n\nWhich is ironic. This seems to be the case of many people in powerful positions over the last few years. Continuing with that logical consistency, we should stop allowing incompetence to get in the way of what is right.", "495" ], [ "> He answered repeatedly that it is policy not to confirm nor deny weather in active investigation is taking place\n\nYou ever think that maybe you won a fight that maybe you didnt want to win? You are arguing that he shouldnt have done <PERSON> wrong and that he shouldnt be making anything about her investigation public. But he *should* do <PERSON> wrong (WRONG) and make this public? Pick a side here.", "12" ], [ "This is why this is a good sub and fuck everyone that thinks otherwise. Democrats are playing into GOP hands so goddamned bad and they dont even know it. They took back the propaganda ban so they could lie to the public through media to win *this election* without realizing they gave the entire country (Republican controlled State Assemblies) the ability to *propagandize public education*. These short sighted idiots. (Im a Democrat)", "468" ], [ "They also legalized propaganda to be used against US citizens in America. Conveniently that story was also broke by BuzzFeed.\n\n_URL_1_\n\n > The new law would give sweeping powers to the government to push television, radio, newspaper, and social media onto the U.S. public. “It removes the protection for Americans,” says a Pentagon official who is concerned about the law. “It removes oversight from the people who want to put out this information. **There are no checks and balances. No one knows if the information is accurate, partially accurate, or entirely false.”**\n\n_URL_0_", "840" ], [ "I'd say it is very important to know the history of these people in office and how they manipulate and lie when is most convenient or necessary. Sure this may have been posted by someone whose political beliefs you dont agree with, but it is at least tangentially related to the conspiracy that elected officials have conflicting values depending on when the question is asked. This is also a solid response to the common argument \"the two parties are obviously different\". FWIW, Im a democrat that finds this two faced nonsense unacceptable. This is exactly why the right can get away with their bullshit and exactly why Republicans are *correct* to question the motives of the left. Similar to lying media on both sides. And as a Democrat, we liberals dont seem to notice how full of shit our side can be. I want liberals to see this stuff and hold *our own* side accountable when this inevitably happens again.", "988" ], [ "Here is Salon saying the exact opposite and not running a retraction.\n\n_URL_0_\n\n > The strike was initially planned during the final days of President <PERSON>’s administration, but because the military wanted to conduct the raid during a moonless night, <PERSON> felt the need to postpone it until after his term had ended. \n\nSince Salon has not run a retraction, the best you can say is that someone is full of shit.", "906" ], [ "Here's a non-editorial that was a top post of this sub last week:\n\n_URL_0_\n\n > The strike was initially planned during the final days of President <PERSON>’s administration, but because the military wanted to conduct the raid during a moonless night, <PERSON> felt the need to postpone it until after his term had ended. \n\nSince Salon has not run a retraction, the best you can say is that someone is full of shit.\n\nAlso your link says this:\n\n > But a current White House official claimed the order did go through National Security Council reviews until January 6, when a National Security Council Deputies Committee meeting was called. Deputies from Defense, State, CIA and the National Security Council met and approved the raid, contingent on the need for a moonless night.\n\nLiterally says <PERSON> approved the raid, which is to say that if the inauguration was in March, this raid would have occurred the same way. This isnt an <PERSON>/<PERSON> issue. This is an American Foreign Policy issue.", "906" ], [ "Yemen is already at odds with the US. I am pretty skeptical the US ever cared about having any sort of permission considering the US is backing Saudi Arabia in a genocide against the Yemeni people right now.\n\n_URL_1_\n\n_URL_0_\n\n > A blockade imposed by Saudi Arabia has further exacerbated this crisis, pushing hunger-stricken Yemen to the brink of famine. “An entire generation could be crippled by hunger,” a World Food Program official warned this week. At least 14 million Yemenis, more than half of the country’s population, are going hungry.", "819" ], [ "> But a current White House official claimed the order did go through National Security Council reviews until January 6, when a National Security Council Deputies Committee meeting was called. Deputies from Defense, State, CIA and the National Security Council met **and approved** the raid, contingent on the need for a moonless night.\n\nfrom your article.", "298" ], [ "> But a current White House official claimed the order did go through National Security Council reviews until January 6, when a National Security Council Deputies Committee meeting was called. Deputies from Defense, State, CIA and the National Security Council met and approved the raid, contingent on the need for a moonless night.\n\n_URL_0_\n\nWho was president on January 6th that approved this? <PERSON> said yes.", "298" ], [ "> But a current White House official claimed the order did go through National Security Council reviews until January 6, when a National Security Council Deputies Committee meeting was called. Deputies from Defense, State, CIA and the National Security Council met and approved the raid, contingent on the need for a moonless night.\n\n_URL_1_\n\nWho was president on January 6th that approved this?\n\nSalon huh? I wonder what else they had to say about it in an article that was at the top of this sub last week:\n\n_URL_0_\n\n\n > The strike was initially planned during the final days of President <PERSON>’s administration, but because the military wanted to conduct the raid during a moonless night, <PERSON> felt the need to postpone it until after his term had ended. \n\nSince Salon has not run a retraction, the best you can say is that someone is full of shit.\n\nEdit: Oh, no rebuttal?", "906" ], [ "nope.\n\n > But a current White House official claimed the order did go through National Security Council reviews until **January 6*, when a National Security Council Deputies Committee meeting was called. Deputies from Defense, State, CIA and the National Security Council met **and approved the raid**, contingent on the need for a moonless night.\n\n_URL_0_\n\nWho was president to approve that on January 6th?", "298" ], [ "> National Security Council \n\nDid you know the President is on the National Security Council? \n\nAnd here is Salon reporting that <PERSON> did approve the raid:\n\n_URL_0_\n\n\n > The strike was initially planned during the final days of President <PERSON>’s administration, but because the military wanted to conduct the raid during a moonless night, <PERSON> felt the need to postpone it until after his term had ended. \n\nSince Salon has not run a retraction, the best you can say is that someone is full of shit.", "609" ], [ "/enoughtrumpspam banned me but I don't know if I still am. Also there was this weird sub tracking all users that posted at t_d but I don't know what that was about, no comments zero karma no subscribers but thousands of posts. I think that sub was used to auto ban t_d users. But I am not sure. I don't know of any other bans for posting there. Also this was before the election, I could not say if they still ban those that continue to post on t_d. \n\nEdit: Just checked, still banned.", "728" ], [ "<PERSON> hosts a couple of podcasts. \"hardcore history\" and \"common sense\". They are both fantastic. Everyone in America should listen to both. But the most compelling and fascinating is his most recent \"Destroyer of Worlds\" episode of HH. It was meant to be a quick rundown of the Cuban missile crisis instead its a 6 hour explanation of the atomic age culminating in the CMC. It's amazing. Truly. And shockingly prescient.", "371" ], [ "Ohhhhhh. So anyone that doesn't agree is a nazi now? Tell me more about your \"not an echo chamber\". Seriously, you are saying your side wants to treat people like human beings but anyone that does not agree one hundred percent with everything I agree with needs to gtfo. That doesn't sound like how you treat a people when you respect their personhood and agency. \n\nEdit: I just saw your username. I get it now.", "743" ], [ "> FBI Director <PERSON> said in a July 2016 statement that the FBI investigation \"found no evidence that any of the additional work-related emails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them.\"\n\nThat is still some bullshit. They were deleted and not handed over. That is still obstruction.\n\n > <PERSON> added in a later congressional hearing that the FBI learned no one on <PERSON>’s staff specifically asked the employee to delete the emails following the New York Times story and subpoena. Rather, the employee made that decision on his own.\n\nThis is actually claiming to have proven a negative. Literally impossible. \n\nAlso linking to Politifact after we know that the DNC coordinates to edit their articles is kind of weak.", "776" ], [ "Dont misinterpret what I am saying, I agree with you. That doesnt mean that the largest political message board in the world isnt pushing and strongly supporting a specific narrative against a vast swath of americans. What I said was a rebuttal to a very specific statement that has room to be questioned. If that statement were used in that other sub with the shoe on the other foot, you might receive death threats. That is all.", "728" ], [ "> What <PERSON> did was what 99% of government officials do.\n\nNot only is that completely bullshit, it doesnt excuse his behavior - even if entirely true. The defense is now \"I am no worse than <PERSON>\"? \n\n > <PERSON>'s emails should not have been a scandal\n\nSo neither should \"RUSSIA!\" because all Russia did was point out how the DNC likes risotto, right? Why would the DNC make anything out their risotto recipes? What are they ashamed of? Their overly liberal use of garlic? So again, maybe you are under-informed?", "169" ], [ "> You need to notify people in any lawsuit for it to proceed, in this case there are several \"John Does\" and by beginning the lawsuit <PERSON>'s lawyer has access to more legal tools to find the identity of these John Does, such as subpoenaing certain private records\n\nThe way you contact these <PERSON>'s is by publishing in local papers and all those land ownership records are public information (I do this for a living). What *private* records do you suppose would be accessible, discoverable, and of any value that a judge could grant access to that would be *more effective* than a phone call to a county recorder/assessor?", "546" ], [ "> when the reality of it was that her server might have been compromised.\n\nYour link says that it certainly happened. \n\n > Ironically, that whole debacle was less of a threat to national interests and safety than what <PERSON> managed to pull in his first day as president.\n\nWe wont know until the emails get declassified in literally 74 more years. The Gulf of Tonkin Incident was declassified after 50. Until Iraq, Vietnam was the single worst foreign policy blunder in the western world that lead to over 60k american deaths. That somehow is less inflammatory than what was on the server. Food for thought.\n\nAnd so you dont get the wrong idea, Im a Democrat.", "452" ], [ "> confirmation bias\n\nYou dont need confirmation bias with primary resources.\n\n > took advantage of disgruntled <PERSON> supporters who don't understand how anything in government works\n\nLMFAO. Maybe they knew too well how it all worked considering so much of his support was from independents and they knew all that BS was going on long before the emails were released. <PERSON> supporters still deny there was anything in the emails, so who are the truly naive ones here?", "452" ], [ "I agree, on the condition that someone isnt privately working to undermine their public position. But that is nearly impossible to prove one way or the other. I dont think it is on its own a bad way to govern, and as you say it can be a good thing in the hands of quality governing. Given the option between two people, all else being equal (note Im not actually saying that all things *are* equal) it is better to take the one side that actually believes in their message vs the one espousing support because of political pressure. This reasoning is why SOPA keeps coming back, or why Keystone and DAPL arent already dead. If the public position is to oppose it and private is to support it, then all a corrupt politician would have to do is the magicians sleight of hand to distract you from your opposition to specific legislation for long enough for their privately desired option to pass.", "736" ], [ "> Is it not better than having no chance of changing her mind?\n\nIt wouldnt be unless you are being leveraged deliberately by someone that wants to use you for their own ends. At the end of the day, they wouldnt have to follow through at all because they know you are holding on to the hope that they will do the right thing, and you buy into it because that candidate told you that the opposition has no chance of carrying out your wishes. There is literally zero incentive for the left to follow through on these things unless you call them on it.", "856" ], [ "> I want so badly to embrace \"When they go low, we go high,\" but I'm afraid we're gonna have to fight just as dirty if we don't want to lose our grasp at our government.\n\nI hate this so fucking much. That said I am so fucking glad people like you are out there doing exactly that. *That* being said, I think the only way to fix our politics is to hold our own accountable. So that is my own fight. I hold democrats feet to the fire (to the point that I have to use disclaimers in any conversation long enough, pointing out im actually a Democrat). *ALL OF THAT SAID*, you are doing the lords work. Fight the good fight.", "468" ], [ "Or...unelectable people is the reason Democrats lose. Lmao. You blame the voters for not falling in line behind someone that defended many of the policies we attack <PERSON> for daily - Like the TPP, DAPL, SOPA, DOMA, CISPA, NSA spying and *fake news*. How you didnt know that those positions would cost the dems the election is on you and the DNC.", "468" ] ]
145
[ 22684, 14675, 357, 19114, 20991, 7622, 16556, 23700, 24284, 19455, 16540, 24185, 17672, 6187, 12129, 21792, 23715, 12382, 13750, 5966, 12999, 5835, 19155, 3529, 4529, 20256, 10922, 2351, 5828, 1535, 1729, 15092, 19223, 12128, 21674, 16584, 2851, 24211, 8108, 22149, 24755, 14067, 10483, 18175, 2917, 22567, 856, 1073, 4589, 23687, 2107, 17399, 2633, 8539, 163, 24771, 22932, 16258, 16531, 1222, 14598, 22476, 4910, 19789, 23806, 7543, 15113, 2737, 25226, 6026, 6277, 460, 1369, 3850, 10874, 11130, 22445, 15366, 7613, 633, 4129, 6082, 18031, 435, 1571, 22506, 25409, 14246, 24083, 21932, 17466, 10495, 19909, 4889, 19043, 22635, 11904, 23362, 9212, 11431, 15413, 2403, 20451, 6397, 1428, 22612, 6256, 7954, 13778, 12409, 4670, 16937, 3721, 1238, 1237, 11716, 13752, 18828, 18477, 25404, 3735, 5248, 10176, 15367, 3985, 25474, 11821, 3474, 21648, 4459, 2983, 2606, 4, 14226, 7002, 14139, 9367, 20707, 8017, 5697, 20950, 10790, 16411, 10082, 8685, 5708, 95, 5490, 25124, 18400, 275, 24734, 15558, 4163, 7985, 6427, 132, 5052, 21375, 5076, 61, 7814, 332, 21742, 15477, 10797, 19776, 11183, 14213, 7051, 5290, 22886, 24769, 6178, 9841, 5463, 5661, 23188, 11627, 19559, 12264, 19687, 19658, 23571, 3501, 4824, 13519, 15931, 4811, 6310, 22156, 17256, 22014, 20365, 8627, 24445, 7778, 7636, 25251, 12893, 17559, 25052, 23579, 24989, 14191, 8540, 15823, 3818, 22393, 20063, 24662, 10416, 8384, 9842, 13802, 23826, 17610, 8558, 21099, 16798, 19807, 10453, 13060, 1312, 13046, 5651, 13851, 5142, 14000, 13573, 17513, 5075, 18012, 16131, 20729, 24984, 361, 12361, 25066, 14964, 23629, 3742, 877, 12119, 13147, 21811, 12597, 5040, 11052, 7677, 9672, 17519, 23331, 16963, 21033, 7609, 2019, 5288, 1871, 9578, 25134, 18362, 24928, 13400, 12964, 797, 11805, 5418, 24530, 13398, 11837, 4450, 8851, 23163, 16569, 16189, 18272, 13316, 14466, 18808, 17507, 12001, 22086, 20038, 13377, 11884, 2191, 13238, 19348, 13157, 18543, 2533, 19113, 10139, 10011, 21321, 18681, 20858, 2436, 12768, 6287, 6157, 9880, 11758, 8734, 12888, 19244, 7791, 19849, 11463, 9033, 10433, 4132, 8819, 18320, 22176, 5156, 598, 266, 5779, 7440, 22713, 6335, 3197, 16152, 22034, 14448, 17235, 14944, 2144, 19165, 15006, 5881, 12744, 15645, 18059, 13822, 9110, 1462, 24651, 9466, 10192, 639, 18831, 10785, 17048, 19425, 21843, 21522, 14659, 10529, 10850, 7655, 9501, 3828, 16560, 15493, 19850, 2287, 6028, 20713, 5592, 1126, 4248, 17584, 22254, 4389, 2275, 12136, 22424, 921, 18826, 3748, 1966, 22648, 16277, 18914, 24948, 3039, 20988, 9051, 6608, 13904, 9571, 4609, 12559, 7719, 19610, 2793, 20607, 23358, 10402, 5729, 2127, 3404, 6811, 21419, 23514, 2321, 16288, 1499, 23977, 16777, 18894, 23914, 13628, 21120, 22688, 12112, 10868, 8493, 6975, 19562, 12912, 25386, 8221, 5330, 18390, 7271, 24314, 4119, 1878, 18819, 18745, 12417, 5063, 19691, 20823, 806, 13179, 17095, 7057, 15889, 10108, 23990, 11336, 12507, 14124, 17656, 20368, 23626, 25322, 2583, 14220, 21395, 9913, 2134, 6259, 10, 18182, 11455, 22006, 20332, 10185, 8607, 1769, 8806, 8942, 25508, 1781, 3967, 4565, 9308, 11302, 8695, 7904, 15885, 2317, 16979, 6272, 4538, 9938, 22180, 19592, 23820, 22242, 19389, 23173, 4797, 24093, 21460, 17237, 25522, 13738, 352, 21233, 15251, 14156, 22419, 13414, 10759, 10497, 6303, 7810, 14379, 3141, 9677, 1519, 8687 ]
reddit_dump_03throwaway03
[ [ "Disagree. You're not born in \"the wrong body\". You're born in your body. A short person, an person missing toes at birth, a person with facial deformities, a person with severe allergies, they are not born in \"the wrong body\". They are born in their body and they have to deal with the hand they have been dealt just like everyone else.\n\nEveryone has the right to alter their body how they see fit and what is within their financial and physical means.", "379" ], [ "Second the lesbian drama comment. Though I might watch this on a Netflix special.\n\nIn all seriousness, just back out of the whole situation. Almost all relationships at your age fail, especially lesbian ones. \n\nWhich would be fine but by perusing <PERSON>, you basically, statistically, are sacrificing your best friend for what will likely be a short term fling.\n\n<PERSON> will not understand and be supportive. Find some other girl to crush on", "494" ], [ "You've got an uphill battle. \n\nCheating isnt a mistake like leaving the stove on. Barring rare circumstances involving drugs, cheating is a series of choices made, in which anywhere along the way you can choose a different path.\n\nAlso when it comes to your family, many people believe either a person is capable of cheating or they are not. Now they know you are the kind of person that cheats. Any many people also believe once a cheater always a cheater.\n\nAnother thing you might not have considered. Now that your family knows you had better tell any girl you start dating that you have cheated on an ex. Because from this point onward you rist your family telling them out of concern for them any time you bring a girl home.", "901" ], [ "I am a bi male and support LGBT rights. However I will not date a bi girl. Call me a hypocrite, call me insecure, whatever. Truth is the two times I did it went badly, I've never personally known a bi girl that didnt have a history of cheating, and I decided that I just dont want that added stress on my mind in a relationship.", "640" ], [ "Sadly some people still see it as cheating. I had a gf and one day she \"soft\" broke up with me. Said she liked me and still wanted to date but wasnt ready (in her words) to be in an exclusive relationship. Seems pretty crystal clear to me.\n\nA week or so later an ex hit me up, we went to dinner and then back to her place. One thing led to another but before the clothes started flying I was honest about dating someone not exclusive and we made it clear to each other this was just a night of fun and didnt mean anything.\n\nThrough the grapevine it got back to my \"gf\" and she exploded for cheating on her. I was dumbfounded. I literally assumed one of the reasons we broke up was so she could sleep with other guys! We never managed to patch things up (though after that outburst I didnt really want to)", "901" ], [ "Yes you MIGHT get COVID if you go to an event like that. MIGHT. And that's even if anyone there has it. You WOULD have been grief stricken for life if you didnt get those last special moments with your mother.\n\nYour wife was completely out of line and paranoid and making this all about her. I get your frustration with the dead bedroom situation but honestly even if everything were great in that area she was out of line here by quite a ways.", "981" ], [ "Based on the wording here, I would guess that she sees you in the getting to know each other stage of dating. With only one exception, every relationship I have started has started out just dating. I would PREFER they are not going out/sleeping with other people but I never felt it was my business until I had the \"Are we exclusive?\" talk.\n\nSo maybe this friend is still feeling you out and not ready to give up another fun aspect of her life yet until and unless she decides an exclusive relationship with you is worth giving up her FWB.\n\nCompletely reasonable though I have to admit it's even more awkward that the FWB is your roommate.\n\nI'm not sure I would proceed with this if I were you. Even if you start a relationship, you have two potential issues. One, if the relationship goes well you might get some backlash from your roommate. Two, if the relationship fails then you may find yourself in a living situation where you get to hear your ex having sex with your roommate.", "657" ], [ "<PERSON>\n\nYour sister is a major one though.\n\nPlaying the \"gay\" card is just as bad as playing the race card, the fat card, the woman card, the man card, the trans card, etc\n\nBasically saying \"I am entitled to X even if obtained illegally or at the expense of someone else because I am Y\"\n\nYour sister not only took something of yours, she also destroyed it.\n\nGay pride is one thing but saying only gays can have rainbows is.....gay narcissism? Is that a thing? Seems like it could be.", "650" ], [ "NTA as long as you are letting her go.\n\nWeddings can kind of suck for random guests anyway. I've been to two where my partner was much more involved with everyone there and I just made awkward conversations here and there. Now add on someone I might want to punch? No thanks.\n\nJust make sure you dont end up giving your wife hell for going after.", "275" ], [ "I know it kind of sucks now in the world we live in, and it also kind of sucks to \"punish\" a victim, but this sounds like a situation to seriously talk about limiting or even removing all devices she has access to that allow her this sort of behavior. No cell phone (or maybe one without internet if those are even still a thing), no personal tablets or PC. If she is doing online school it has to be in an area she can be monitored. Install keyloggers and such on devices if she cannot be.\n\nSometimes you have to protect people from themselves. I dont see that as any different than taking blades away from a cutter.", "119" ], [ "Periods are flat out gross. But just as a lot of human anatomy is and I have yet to meet a woman IRL that is happy about having them.\n\nAs I guy I do find blood disgusting and I have made it clear to all my partners that I am not interested in any vaginal play at all during a period.\n\nHowever, I am still a guy who has gone to Walmart at 3am to buy Midol and a heating pad when my partner was having horrible cramps. I've brought extra tampons to my partner when I've gotten an urgent text from them at work on their day off. Things like that.\n\nOnly time i have full on went off on my partner was when she left period panties with the very soaked pad still in them just laying on the bathroom floor and I stepped in them on accident. But I think that was a fair general household complaint.", "670" ], [ "First priority: You\n\nSecond priority: Fiance\n\nThird priority: Your child\n\n(Though I understand some people would flip two and three)\n\nFourth priority: Siblings.\n\nIt sounds like right now you are grasping at strings to barely take care of one, two, and three. This is not a time to add another. \n\nResentment WILL build. Add on top of this those kids are coming with emotional baggage. If things get bad enough the kids and possibly your own could end up being removed anyway.\n\nFoster care sounds like the right place for them, and you, right now.", "774" ], [ "I've never been asked to do that I might find it odd but not derogatory.\n\nAs a side note I would have screwed it up if asked. I was 35 watching a stand up comedian with my gf and the comedian made a joke that he thought that you just stuck the pads to your body like a bandaid. I sat up and said dead seriously \"Wait that's not how they work?\"\n\nMy gf about died laughing. I didnt know the sticky part was to hold it in the underwear.", "670" ], [ "NAH.\n\nCouple thoughts though. Kids all over the world dont get a choice if siblings come into the mix. Lots of kids would rather be only children but the parents have the right to add to their family.\n\nIf your only or main reason for not adopting a child in need is your son might be annoyed then I dont think that's a good reason. Also a LOT of special needs kids grow up, despite parents best intentions, thinking they are the center of the universe. An older sibling may actually be beneficial to his development.", "361" ], [ "Congrats you introduced me to a fetish I didnt even know about.\n\nSo do you just find hair attractive? Like....I would say well over 90% of guys have certain hairstyles they find more attractive than others.\n\nDo you want to.....get a \"hair job\"? I had one of those once where a girl with long silky hair wrapped in around my dick and jerked me off with it. It was...interesting and I certainly didnt hate it but I didnt think it was the most efficient. Even then I wouldnt put it as any weirder than a titfuck.\n\nDo you want to cut off their hair and make a wig out of it and prance around in it? That's where you may start having issues finding a compatible partner.", "90" ], [ "You got raped. Good enough reason to leave right there.\n\nAlso if it only happened once, hate to bring it up, but it might not even be your kid. Women (and true men sometimes too) can go baby crazy. She may have cheated on you without birth control to get pregnant then knew she had to do it once with you in a certain time frame to make sure you didnt suspect.\n\nRegardless if the marriage survives get a DNA test at birth if not before.", "454" ], [ "Sure cause people when they have a gun in their face go \"oh yeah I remember hearing once on this one 60 minutes special years ago that this type of robbery USUALLY ends without shots fired so I'll just comply\"\n\nVS.\n\n\"Hey this guy just threatened several people with lethal force and he currently is not looking at me or pointing a gun at me, so I can either do something OR maybe wait til he just turns back around and shoots me.\"", "1016" ], [ "A) You dont go back\n\nB) Find out the laws on how illegal this is in your state. Unfortunately that might get her punished but doesnt negate the pregnancy\n\nC) You may have to check me on this one from a legal standpoint. Do NOT agree to pay for anything pre birth at all unless legally ordered to do so.\n\nD) Insist on a paternity test. Do not sign a birth certificate without one if it gets to that.\n\nE) Make it CLEAR to her that she is one hundred percent on her own now. Regardless of how she feels morally the slap of reality in the face of realizing even with possible child support she may be a single mother is a wake up call to a lot of people.\n\nF) If friends start asking about why you broke up, be HONEST. She will be spinning a different story. Get ahead of it. Again, her realizing that she might be losing friends and family support might encourage abortions or adoptions. \n\nG) If she does end up pregnant and decides on an abortion but insists you pay, DO IT. But dont just give her a check, take her down to the clinic, pretend to be loving and supportive, then as soon as you are sure it's all done, bail and block her on everything. Not saying you have to be so heartless as to like leave her ride less at the clinic (though that would be fair) but no contact after.\n\nEdit: Changed pregnancy to paternity on point D", "992" ], [ "How do I say this without sounding homophobic?\n\nI've seen this probably about 8 times in my life with bi girls (and maybe 3 times with bi guys)\n\nIt almost seems that when people are exploring their bi side they almost dont think that doing things inappropriate with the same sex is actually \"cheating\". \n\nI had a huge fight with an ex (bi) girlfriend once because she let her lesbian friend, who had admitted to both of is she had a crush on my girlfriend, share her bed one night. She told me \"girls share beds all the time\". I asked if she would be okay if I slept with a girl that admitted she had a crush on me and she said that was completely different. No, it's not.\n\nPoint there was maybe <PERSON> somehow has twisted she hasn't actually cheated but she has.\n\nTell the bf. If your sister snaps back just tell her that if she really has feelings for <PERSON> she should be thanking you for giving her the opportunity to pursue it.\n\nIf they start denying it at dinner, put <PERSON> and your mom on the spot.\n\nAlternatively if you want a quieter approach just that the bf aside quietly.", "901" ], [ "Also I misread something. Sounds like your sister is also concealing (or in denial) about the status of <PERSON> and her boyfriend. Sounds like it could be typical cheater behavior of \"I really love YOOOOOOU but I just cant break up with my current partner because of (insert bullshit reason) but I promise I will soon!\"\n\nThe bf deserves better. Especially if hes already broken up with them before because of the accusations that might have been true before but are now.", "650" ], [ "There is risk in everything. There is risk in just getting in the car to go to their house.\n\nCOVID is not a death sentence for most people. It is okay for people to weigh risk vs reward. A parent dying and seeing their kids and grandkids for the last time is a valid reason for risk.\n\nIf people are going out to a restaurant right now (safely) and that is acceptable, this is 100 times more justifiable", "912" ], [ "NTA\n\n\"Trans culture\" or whatever you want to call it is bullshit. Your heritage is your heritage, that is not debatable. Connect more with a different culture? Great! Learn about it, appreciate it, study a language? Awesome!\n\nBut you cant, say, be born German and say you are really a Brazilian.\n\nThis sounds like a lot of just teenage angst. And are you sure they aren't just trolling you completely?", "847" ], [ "<PERSON>\n\nAs someone who has had SEVERE issues from someone calling in a mental health check on me, yeah, yta.\n\nAll this does is get cops to EITHER do a quick check where the patient lies to get them to go away. Or they get hauled off to an involuntary commitment where they (in the USA) get a huge medical bill for it and lie to get out in 3 or 4 days anyway.", "260" ], [ "Ah see but condom companies know something few people want to admit!\n\nNon parents have MUCH more sex than parents. So you start giving a 20 year old access to condoms, they will likely continue using them well into their lives. But if said, say now 25 year old has a child, they may go from sex 5 times a week to 5 times a year! And then they have to wait many years for their \"next client\" (the child) to start needing their product.", "292" ], [ "You need to separate them into different households possibly permanently. \n\nThe incest is the smaller issue here honestly.\n\nYour daughter accusing your son of rape is the thing that needs to be focused on, because one of three things just happened there.\n\n1) Your son raped your daughter. Horrible but unlikely as he is the younger. \n\n2) It was mutual and your daughter is so f**** up that she decided to throw a life altering accusation that could cause HUGE legal problems for your son as well as ruin the family dynamic forever.\n\n3) Number two, but ADD IN that as the older child your daughter could have been grooming and raping your son and he, being the younger one, as many victims are, believes its consensual. In which case you have a sociopath on your hands.", "774" ], [ "You stay with her. You be the loving supportive girlfriend she needs. You forgive her. You apologize that you cant give her what she needs right now. You tell her you will try your hardest to do right by her.\n\nUNTIL you dont need her help paying for your treatments anymore.\n\nThen you tell her now that you are recovered you feel you both need to find someone more compatible with your life goals.\n\nCheating has a price after all.", "901" ], [ "Pet names to me have always just come naturally. \n\nNot every girl I've been with had one. Usually it required some sort of event and I'll admit I can be a bit of a jerk because some (not all but most) were based on teasing.\n\nOne ex got named <PERSON> because I found her freaked out standing on a patio chair running from a rabbit and asked \"You're really scared of a little bun?\"\n\nOne got named <PERSON> because I met her at a very dark time in my life and she guided me through the darkness.\n\nOne got named <PERSON> because she had a bit of a body hair issue (which I actually found cute, it was all white hair, thin and soft)\n\nOne got named <PERSON> because she was small but fierce as hell. \n\nOtherwise the typical \"babe\" just did it for me.", "777" ], [ "NTA\n\nAt all. All the family members whining can take him in themselves. NO ONE should have to have a child by choice.\n\nThat said, I would have maybe tried to coordinate with other family about trying some sort of massive joint custody so no ones life is completely upended.\n\nOP dont listen to all these people saying YTA, I bet not one in ten would take a 15 year old dumped on their doorstep willingly.", "843" ], [ "Believe me that wasnt fun to type out.\n\nIf it were a case of siblings thinking they were in love....okay.....not great but therapy can help here.\n\nIf it were a case of siblings having sex and both of them had a mature \"hey it's just for fun and were bored/horny/lonely\"....okay.....not great but therapy can help here.\n\nBut the rape accusation is just throwing a drum of gas onto a bonfire. It almost makes everything that came before it irrelevant. \n\nIt automatically means one of your kids isnt just confused or...different. It means one of them has a SERIOUS mental issue where they are capable of inflicting great harm on a family member for their own benefit. Whichever side is right......this family will never be whole again.", "454" ], [ "IIRC, when Californina made it a felony to infect someone with HIV, people going in for HIV tests dropped through the floor. Suddenly nobody wanted to get tested because they all wanted the plausible deniability. This obviously led to an increase in the spread of the disease. Nobody wanted to have their sex life controlled by the government which is completely fair. \n\nBut also I dont think I they made it legal, just a misdemeanor. Which still sucks for a few reasons but had its benefits.", "382" ], [ "NTA.\n\nLong hair sucks. One of my exes had butt length hair. Beautiful but my god. \n\nI had to take apart the vaccum cleaner once a month and cut all the hair out of the roller.\n\nI had to spend extra time cleaning my fish tank and hair would get tangled in there.\n\nAlways had to make sure to clean the lint trap every time or dryer wouldnt dry.\n\nDumb cat would occasionally eat her hairs and get constipated so I would have to pull a three foot hair out of a screaming cats butthole every few weeks.\n\nMy ex was disabled so I did this all gladly. But if she wasnt youd be damn sure she would have been doing those things herself.", "90" ], [ "<PERSON> was a dick in general but I tried to tolerate him. With some success.\n\nOne night like 7 of us ordered a really complicated order from a delivery sandwich place. Out of seven combo meals they got everything completely right except forgot one side of chips.\n\nI even volunteered to go without mine as I got a bigger sandwich than the menu seemed to indicate.\n\nThis guy looks at our receipt (by the way it took like 10 minutes to get everything situated and checked. We counted the sandwiches to be sure on entrees but after that the delivery guy left) our receipt shows we were in fact overcharged one dollar for the missing chips.\n\nHe demanded we call the store and either get a refund of one dollar (in cash) or the delivery driver makes another trip for the chips.\n\nAll of us tried to explain why this was unreasonable and he just blurts out \"Well he should be PROUD to do his job correctly and bring you back your chips. If he cant be proud of what he does he needs to get a job somewhere else!\"\n\nYou could hear the crickets outside. Guy literally thought everyone liked their job and took pride in it and could just change at will. \n\nAnd the guy even had retail experience in high school! But i guess jobs don't grind you down when you know its just for extra fun money, you can quit anytime, and you have a high five figure already waiting for you at your family's company after high school", "428" ], [ "Not too bad but friend had moved into a new house. First night I spent the night there I had to get up to use bathroom.\n\nWas pretty big house and there were like five doors on the upstairs hallway alone.\n\nSleepily stumbled like six steps into the room before realizing A) this was not the bathroom and B) this was his parents room and C) they are doing it.\n\nI mumble an apology then decide screw the upstairs bathroom. Tiptoed downstairs to find the lower one and find his sister (college age) topless and in panties getting a midnight snack.\n\nI gave up and held it til morning.", "875" ], [ "On paper the person administering the drug.\n\nIn reality proving it is something the accused has to do and that could be from very easy to very hard.\n\nIf say a person commits a crime and a very difficult to obtain anesthetic is found in their system, there may be cause to look at that person's medical associates. \n\nIf it's something like your friend spiked your drink at a party with simple alcohol and you got pulled over for a DUI you're never going to beat that charge. No cops are going to bother to investigate it.\n\nAnd of course there is a WHOLE lot of middle ground", "764" ], [ "No. Too many variables and especially when you live in a place like the US a person can get a huge bill.\n\nWe had an employee at work with diagnosed epilepsy. He had told us during hiring but the shift manager on duty didnt know that.\n\nSo when the manager found him in the hallway he called 911. Employee woke up in the hospital, $5000 poorer, because of it boiling down to \"Oh you know you had epilepsy? Well you know there is nothing we can do for it!\"\n\nHe went around his next shift giving VERY explicit instruction to every employee to just lay him down if it happened again.", "42" ], [ "Not exactly my point. Though I do see yours.\n\nFor comparison someone helped medically (ESPECIALLY with free healthcare which catches minor stuff before turning it into major stuff) you've got a fairly good chance of turning that person back to society making money and pursuing goals and being a consumer.\n\nCollege is different. Where should the cutoff be?\n\nI can get on board with a government telling me my taxes need to be higher so <PERSON>, mother of three can get cancer treatment she couldnt afford.\n\nI cant get on board with my taxes being higher because <PERSON> isnt sure what she wants to study so just goes to school for four years, takes a bunch of art and lit classes that dont come with marketable skills then drops out before finishing.\n\nI cant tell you the perfect solution but I can say free college on every subject for all isnt it", "108" ], [ "That's why I said on paper.\n\nBut the other thing that i didnt think of before is depending on the drug what is a reasonable reacting before losing it completely?\n\nIf you felt really fuzzy and out of it, but still able to string words together, it could be argued you knew better than to get behind the wheel.\n\nIf they find a normal mild mannered college student running naked with a crowbar through a hospital yelling about the mole people coming to eat his face they may ask more questions and give benefit of the doubt.", "664" ], [ "Its usually not economical (might be more now with COVID but hopefully that is temporary) for a place to have it's own staff if not primarily deliver. \n\nOne, most drivers have to provide their own vehicles. I'm not even gonna get into much of that but people will get hired at pizza places and tell them if you're in an accident take the decal off. But anyway, if you're a driver for a pizza place you likely dont even have a dining room. All food is carryout or delivery. \n\nTwo, some drivers for family owned places are just family members or other employees, not full time employees. \n\nThree, the restaurants would need to hire enough staff to guarantee reliable delivery times. Ever get annoyed when an pizza place says 45 minutes on a Saturday night? How are you going to feel about a two hour wait (with a three dollar delivery fee) for a $5 hamburger?", "897" ], [ "Only reason I'm glad it happened was like 2 years later I'm driving behind a car just BLASTING obnoxious music. Can hear it fully with my music and windows ip.\n\nBut as I followed them I started to notice their rear tire starting to wobble. No way they could hear it.\n\nManaged to flag the two teens down and explain what was happening before they wrecked. Probably wouldnt have been injured but I'm sure I saved thousands in damages.\n\nI'm guessing insurance doesnt cover that, or at least not without a hefty deductible", "449" ], [ "Go into a reputable sex store like condoms to go or <PERSON>'s secret. If you've never been in a sex store the staff are usually VERY knowledgeable. \n\nI'm not into wax but I've heard horror stories about people getting severe burns when using the wrong kind.\n\nReally also this is a pretty mild kink. Any store should be stocked enough. You can also google those stores websites and browse products to get an idea", "118" ], [ "You say you have never had a father figure.\n\nIts possible your mother isnt concerned with the time you spend or as others have indicated something inappropriate is happening.\n\nIt may simply be that she is seeing how happy you are and worried about what will happen if six months from now they break up?\n\nBalancing a new parental figure into a kids, especially a teens life, is very hard", "900" ], [ "Sounds kinda dumb but take my cat in to be put down.\n\nI can handle human death easier than most it seems but taking my girl in...\n\nI've never been so choked up I literally couldnt talk. Only time in my life that's happened.\n\nThe other hardest was let the love of my life go. It was devastating but at least I knew that was for the best for her. Sometimes you meet the right person at the wrong wrong time", "287" ], [ "Also if it hit your brain dont worry if no one followed up with you. It is literally no ones job to. \n\nThe medics care about the patient. They appreciate (very keyword here) helpful bystanders but once they leave they dont care about the scene.\n\nPolice only want to keep order. Unless they felt someone on scene deserved investigation for criminal activity (like say if someone pushed the guy in) they dont care.\n\nHospital staff dont really care what's outside their walls. They have enough to deal with.\n\nAnd the victim probably never got your name or knows how to contact you.\n\nAnd finally because of HIPPA there is no one you can call that could legally tell you what happened except the patient themselves. \n\nSo rest assured you did your best!", "141" ], [ "That's a little different. That is an employer paying for an investment. And I have no issue with that system because it's a company taking a calculated risk.\n\nWe have that in limited forms here.\n\nThe ambulance company I worked for paid upfront for your medic certificate. However it was dependent on signing a two year contract. If you quit or got fired for any non medical reason the bill was due in full", "396" ], [ "Not so much dumb but just infuriating. \n\nI knew a friend who worked for a construction company in 2000. The Mexican guy who owned it was a hard worker but was stuck in the paper age. Friend came on and single handedly grew his business while updating.\n\nIt was construction and his business took off with more efficiency due to tech. Within a year the business has almost tripled. The owner hired more crews and at his insistence, myself and another friend were brought into the office.\n\nFor about two years we handled everything great. About 50 field staff and us three office guys.\n\nOne day we come and find the owner hired ALL FOUR of his daughters to work in the office with us. We didnt need a fourth person, let alone a fifth, sixth, or seventh.\n\nNext week all us guys had our hours cut. Then the week after (the girls were kind of trained) we guys had our hours reduced to 2 shifts a week. The next week one. \n\nWe were told point blank it would be that way until we quit. Which of course we all did but I still consider that a firing.\n\nNo other reason than nepotism.", "428" ], [ "Not reliably. First of all air dispersal is good but not 100%. Some plants just may not get hit due to wind or something but the farmer isnt trying to protect every ear of corn, just the majority. \n\nLikewise spraying a field or town is going to require a lot less than spraying every square millimeter of habituated land", "408" ], [ "I'd say far. \n\nProblems include price, size, comfort, the fact every amputee or born cripple has a slightly different stump, nerve damage happens in injuries. Probably a few I cannot think of.\n\nI think we will get close but not perfect anywhere near our lifetimes unless we get some sort of biomechanical interface that can actually regrow nerves", "421" ], [ "Unpopular opinion to be sure but if your confident enough just go up to him at some point you have him alone and tell him in no uncertain terms he will be eating his testicles if he touches you again.\n\nI'm not trying to make a joke. People take advantage of others because they look for victims. If you show him you are not, you will LIKELY feel better and he LIKELY wont press things. Everything is a gamble", "591" ], [ "What really pissed me off later was about two months before this happened I found something very incriminating while going through his stuff (as part of my job, not snooping)\n\nHe had about one half staff legal and one half staff illegal immigrants. I have no moral issue with that. Everyone has to put food on the table.\n\nThe issue was the paperwork I found (it's been almost 2 decades and I can't necessarily recall exactly but I brought it up to our accountant and that's where I found the trouble)\n\nSo what the owner was doing was he had found a way to deduct all the illegals social security pay, Medicare, etc. He CLAIMED he was doing it to keep wages fair so the illegals actually took home the same amount as the legals and the legals wouldnt get mad.\n\nBut he had found a way to report that income.....but not pay it. So he as the owner was pocketing the difference.\n\nAgain I dont necessarily have an issue stealing from the government in certain cases. But this was something I could have probably cost him his business with a couple calls.\n\nThing is.....like a lot of capitalism, it would have been a setback for the owner but devastating for the workers", "113" ], [ "This sounds sexist but more women in my experience think they can turn to public anger, insults and violence without consequences.\n\nYes your average <PERSON> knows that if she hits the male manager with a crowbar she's going to jail. But the average <PERSON> also thinks if the male manager takes a step towards him she has a right to assault him.\n\nHere is a good example of what I mean (I believe the follow up was she was sentenced to a couple years)\n\nWatch \"British tourist slaps immigration official\" on YouTube\n_URL_0_\n\nSee how he is calm and making no threats but she just assumes because he is an authority figure and a male she has a right to physically assault him", "716" ], [ "Your body WANTS to lose heat from healing, metabolism, growth, digestion, etc efficiently. \n\nThe most efficient was to move heat is from higher to lower temps. This is why if are even at 99 degree temps, just a hair over body temp, shit gets bad fast.\n\nOur body is now absorbing and not repelling heat and that causes damage. Our body needs tricks (panting, sweating, seeking shade, hell even vomiting) to try to lose heat.\n\nOnly a little related but this is why a five degree difference in the shade can feel like so much sometimes. You have exponentially increased your body's ability to cool.\n\nIt's also why I learned that going into a hot shower after a workout is miserable. \n\nI for years would work out heavily, get into a hot shower, get out and dry then immediately start sweating like I had been working out 15 seconds ago and not 15 minutes.\n\nI didn't give my body a chance to expel the heat", "891" ], [ "Depends. I see your point but by this definition all sports (save a few like running and wresting) rely on objects whether they be a bow and arrow, rings for gymnastics, a ball for soccer, or a car for a race.\n\nI would argue this. Take two cars and have them race each other. Then switch the drivers. If one car constantly wins, it is not.a sport. If one driver constantly wins regardless of the car, it is a sport", "729" ], [ "Survival post CPR is like 4%.\n\nIt is an acceptable risk to break ribs. This is why you also completely verify lack of pulse and breathing before you do CPR. Otherwise someone could have low blood sugar and you just broke 6 bones \"helping them\".\n\nFirst time I did CPR it felt like the ribcage turned to brittle glass. The sound was like putting a bunch of brittle twigs inside an aluminum chip bag and crushing it.\n\nShe did not make it.", "421" ], [ "Porn yes. Traditional movies....I want to say no but maybe?\n\nI cant think of a reason you would. You can't actually show it. Weve gotten good at camera work. Porn actors say multiple takes suck.\n\nI mean porn isn't illegal but I cannot think of a reason. It would also be stupid to sign an actor for a non porn, film half a movie, and have them change their mind", "518" ], [ "Oh. Our ambulance company used to call people nuggets when they were double, triple, or quadruple amputees that were that way because they were dumb. Almost always it was not taking care of a condition like diabetes. And we would have to run these fat immobile people to appointments and dialysis because they didnt care enough about themselves to keep all their parts.\n\nSome of the bigger ones basically looked like chicken nuggets. That's what I thought you were talking about", "421" ], [ "You might be thinking of the term \"<PERSON>'s Law\"\n\nIt states that the more stimuli or choices a person has in front of them, the harder it is to make a decision. \n\nFor example, a toddler runs out in front of your car. You have limited options (go left, go right, go straight, speed up, stop)\n\nEven though the situation is very dangerous almost all people will react quickly and decisively.\n\n Compare this to a man coming at you with a knife. Do you fight? If so how? With a weapon? What weapon? You have a knife but you see a rock on the ground.\n\nDo you scream? If so what? Get away? Dont hurt me?\n \nDo you run? If so which way?\n\nI think I made my point. More options is slower reaction.", "1016" ], [ "I've seen a video (this is not a reliable suicide because of the difficulty) where they took some people up in a plane and regulated the pressure so their oxygen saturation drops.\n\nContrary to popular belief it is NOT the oxygen in our blood that makes us breath. It is the level of CO2.\n\nBut if you just put a bag over your head (have tried dont recommend) all that happens is oxygen decreases but CO2 builds causing panic.\n\nIn the video since O2 dropped but CO2 didnt rise the people were calm. One controller even said something like \"Dude put your oxygen mask on or your going to die.\" The guy just giggled and said \"I dont want that \" but didnt reach for his mask.\n\nSounds like a great way to go", "863" ], [ "This really needs to be handled with a regular doc. \n\nIn my time in the medical field (6 years) about 98% of patients that young with that many symptoms fall into four categories.\n\nDrug seekers. \n\nHypochondriacs.\n\nMental health issues.\n\nLegit complaints with very rare serious diseases.\n\nAnd almost all are the top three.\n\nA lot of hospitals take a LONG list of symptoms with no signs as bad (symptoms are what a patient reports, signs are what can be seen)\n\nSo if a patient complains of a headache and had a scalp wound from trauma, there is no doubt an injury occured. \n\nIf a patient complains of multiple issues and all vitals and initial tests look normal, going for more expensive tests is wasteful.\n\nI dont think you have a legit complaint here. Schedule a normal appointment with her normal doctor. \n\nIF subsequent tests find something bad you can file a complaint and possibly seek damages", "483" ], [ "I guess a simple but not wholly accurate way would be to flip the scenario.\n\nReally try to see it from their view.\n\nAgain, simplified, but if you can see it but not agree with it you may be okay. If you just cant see it at all you may be a narcissist.\n\nExample. Daughter (12 years old) wants to die her hair neon blue. Is allowed at school but you feel that it's a little too rebellious and after asking her a bunch of reasons why she tells you that two of her friends are getting dye jobs and she wants to fit in. You think she shouldn't just follow the crowd and tell her no, it's not worth the time or money. That decision is questionable but not an narcissistic one.\n\nSame situation but your response is you think all girls period who dye their hair are attention seeking whores and no daughter of yours will be seen as that no matter what her reasons! That's so self centered and therefore could be sarcastic.", "944" ], [ "Some decision in a marriage are one yes means it's the same as two nos (like kids, pets, buying a house)\n\nThings like this are one yes means it's the same as two yeses. Unless the no really really wants to be the bad guy to both. \n\nAlso with things like piercings and haircuts that cant be undone its even more harmful. If one parent grounded a child and the other bought an X box it could be reversed but not here", "83" ], [ "Yes sort of. \n\nDont listen to people saying anything about starvation mode. That's kind of a myth that came about from one skewed study.\n\nNow it's TRUE what you are doing isnt great in the long term. You're going to likely feel temporary negative effects if you did what you describe for say a month straight. Horrible bloating on one day, hunger pains during the week, etc.\n\nWhere you can run into issues during short term starvation is things like vitamins and electrolytes. Not so much calories.\n\nFor an example say someone needs 2000 maintenance calories a day. They want to lose weight. So for two days a week they just dont eat at all. Hard mentally but not really bad physically. \n\nThat person will lose just over a pound a week and should suffer no nutritional issues assuming a balanced diet the other 5 days.\n\nSaid person decided that instead of losing the 30 pounds they wants they wont do it over the roughly six months it would take, they will do it all in one shot and just not eat for 45 days. \n\nBy the while their body might have the calories necessary to sustain them, they might hit things like iron, vitamin, and other deficiencies. This could be serious health issues.\n\nBut simply hitting a caloric deficit wont do it.\n\nSource: lost 80 pounds in less than six months by massive diet and exercise but no starvation. My calorie negative was around 9000 a week but kept a healthy diet.", "727" ], [ "Surrender if possible.\n\nI was talking to some stupid white kid (I'm white).when I walked out of a pool hall once. I've known this kid 25 seconds.\n\nA black guy comes out and mid sentence this white kid flips him off and says \"fuck you and everyone that looks like you\".\n\nWithout a word the black guy grabs the kids shirt, slams him into the brick, and proceeds to beat the hell out of his face. White kid lost literally half his teeth in the punches.\n\nBlack guy looks at me. Our eye meet. His gaze just says \"you with him\"?\n\nI'm a hignly martial artist. All I did was drop into my natural stance which had hands up and open. I can strike very well.and very hard from that stance. \n\nBut open hands say \"I dont want to do this.\"\n\nBlack guy nods and walks away. White kids lies unconscious in pool of own blood.\n\nA", "955" ], [ "This may be the best wrong answer I've ever read. \n\nNot being sarcastic. Reasoning is sound but your classification of disorder is off.\n\nFirst homosexuality used to be a disorder (medically classified) as it didnt synch with lifes desire to procreate. Hence disorder. Really only got removed due to political issues. Same thing is happening with trans people.\n\nLet's go extreme for a second. Take an OCD person. Sometimes they have many ticks or routines (I could be off on my terminology) That person can be happy and live in society (with help often).but _URL_0_ that they may have to literally lock their front door 86 times a day.\n\nSo I'll toss both arguments back at you. If a person with OCD just accepts that he has to lock his door 86 times to be happy does he still have a 'disorder'?\n\nIf a gay man struggles with family acceptance and a lower dating pool is he normal just because a book no longer says he has a disorder just because being gay is now accepted? (For the record have met several people who hate they are gay)", "338" ], [ "Best way I heard it described is this. \n\nFirst off, pain isnt smart. Just like you cannot turn off other sense. (Its too bright. It smells in here. It's too cold)\n\nYour senses continue to transmit data to let you know the situation hasn't changed. In the cold example if you could just turn off cold it would be very easy to fall asleep and die.\n\nPain is the same thing. Pain often lessens after the injury has occured but is still to remind you. (Yeah, hey, that hand you broke last week? Yeah lay off it for awhile til i.can heal it)\n\nNatural painkillers like adrenaline will kick in because the body goes. \"Huh. That bear just bit me. That's gonna suck tomorrow. But only if I LIVE til tomorrow. Better shut off all bad signals til we are safe\"\n\nAlso secondary effect of adrenaline. Your muscles are stronger than your soft tissues. So those enormous feats of strength you hear abou only happen because the body said fuck you to itself and damaged itself for a short term gain", "461" ], [ "Humans dont like losing senses. Sight just happens to be the one we naturally lose due to environment. \n\nSure something CAN be quieter but our hearing isnt actually affected. Same with smell and touch. Taste....bot so much a combat sense.\n\nBut given how many human survival skills require a visual understanding of our surroundings? One of the most natural fears in the world", "595" ], [ "Last question because you actually seem reasonable.\n\nSo why is it considered a 'disorder' for a 'pedophile' to be attracted to 15 or 16 year olds. Many have the bodies of adults. Many have the maturity of adults. In many places it's even legal for a 40 year old to have sex with a 16 year old. But everyone would call them a pedo.\n\nIt seems in those cases it is not even an orientation so much as a preference. (This would not apply to prepubescent people)\n\nSo in these cases it seems the 'disorder' is just imposed by society finding something uncomfortable. \n\nAnd before I sound too creepy I'm 38 and honestly the thought of being with someone under about 29 weirds me out.\n\nI just always thought \"I'm 20 and my biology is telling me to bang that body that cannot produce a child with me is completely natural but banging that 16 year old that I can impregnate is a crime against god, man, and nature\"", "70" ], [ "Maybe encourage him to try crossdressing? See how that feels to him?\n\nI'm a bi crossdresser that struggled for a couple years with the thought of \"am I trans?\"\n\nBut the more I thought of it, the more I realized I had no issue with my male body in day to day life. Working. Working out. Hanging with friends. Running errands. I never cared I was a guy.\n\nOnly during some sexy or alone times did I really want to have a different body.\n\nI admit I've LOVED the thought of having real boobs. But I know in my heart like a lot of girls do, I'd hate them in a lot of situations. \n\n(Also prefer my boy parts)\n\nMaybe see if he can experiment with some drag cloths and test his waters?", "751" ], [ "This has happened before but to my knowledge they didnt just speak to them they retained them. It an effective but costly strategy.\n\nMy understanding is consults, especially free ones, while still allowing client privilege, dont prevent entering another agreement.\n\nFor example I think it would be unethical if you consulted a lawyer, then your opponent actually paid him, and he used anything in your consult against you. Also a judge would likely call you out on thst", "812" ], [ "I'm a high level martial artist (but not MMA fighter)\n\nLearning to manage main is different that not feeling it. I can get punched full force in the face sparring and my initial thought is \"Nice hit! Good job!\" And get back to it. \n\nI'm still.processing pain but mind is trained so say \"Worry about it later\"\n\nBelieve me I wish it was just an on off \nswitch", "52" ], [ "Yes but that is kind of a different thing. \n\nBrain vs nerves.\n\nNerves are the ex girlfriend who stabbed you in the left ballsacks with a pickax when you cheated on her with her attractive but shy cousin.\n\nYour brain is your best friend showing you pictures of yourself high on morphine in the back of an ambulance holding an ice pack to your junk saying \"do you really want to go back there?\"", "461" ], [ "No. I respect them but I just think some of the sayings have taken it too far.\n\n\"Assigned male at birth.\" No, you are a male. You can change a lot about yourself but you're still a man. \n\nBut this is my opinion and dont feel strongly about it. If someone wants to say trans women are women, sure if that's what they think, cool.\n\nI think the phrase \"trans women are women\" is healthy, positive, and accepting/useful.\n\nBut I dont think that phrase can be said as a FACT.", "847" ], [ "Society functions better when people follow the rules, whether laws or interpersonal morals.\n\nUsually (obviously not always) it is in your own best interest to follow the rules.\n\nFor example if you felt it was pointless to care about stealing someone might think it is equally pointless to care about having your head in with a rock for trying.\n\nPeople that treat others well tend to have more friends and healthier relationships. \n\nPeople who dont get shunned eventually", "647" ], [ "All insurance has a gamble. Will you ever need it or not. \n\nI have been paying car insurance for 21 years and never been in an at fault accident. But if I was without insurance I could easily be financially ruined.\n\nInsurance medically doesnt usually protect from costs. It protects from catastrophe. \n\nMost if not all plans have something called an Out Of Pocket maximum. This is the most you ever have to pay in a year (for approved and covered costs)\n\nMy last policy was $6500 I would ever owe. Given that a one night stay in the ER can cost triple that, I'd have had to save my monthly payment for (quick math here...) about eight years to break even", "396" ], [ "MASSIVELY unpopular opinion coming.\n\nWhile you were legally and in my opinion morally raped with that age difference, if you have gone 12 years thinking it was okay, you will do more mental damage to yourself than the incident ever did, if you lock yourself into a victim mindset.\n\nI was sexually assaulted by a woman and it sucked and caused issues but I'm not bothered by it. \n\nI couldnt tell if you were asking this but if you were also asking if you should report it or not, no. If the woman is still alive shes 79 and no court is going to actually punish her for this", "878" ], [ "Fat medically bad for a lot of reasons.\n\nSome surgeons even refuse or are unqualified to perform surgery on very obese people.\n\nIn my EMT days we had to take a 400+ woman from one very good hospital to a specialty trauma center a long way away for a relatively simple broken leg. No surgeon at the sending was confident enough to work with all the fat tissue around the injury.\n\nI can imagine internal surgery is worse.\n\nLooking at an incredibly in shape person with a six pack you could almost tell where the organs should be by sight. Add two hundred pounds and you may have to go poking around a bit", "379" ], [ "My serious relationships have ended for the following (in this case I am putting the term longer than 6 months exclusive dating as serious)\n\n1) Her family was horrible. Not one of six kids finished high school. Two were felons. Four were drug addicts. All smoked. I just couldnt see that family being part of my life. I ended it\n\n2) She was going off to college hours away soon. She didnt want to do long distance. She ended it\n\n3) Finally ended up realizing that all we had in common was liking cats, music, and literature. Dates got progressively more awkward. Mutual ending\n\n4) Tried a last ditch effort to fix a marriage by opening it up. Went horribly. Realized I couldnt live with the way life had become. I ended it.\n\n5) Finances, living too far away, and exes we both wanted to keep in our life that the other hated. Mutually ended\n\n6) She was emotionally cheating and wanted to physically be with that person. She left me.\n\nSo that's it", "585" ], [ "Never call what she did stupid or selfish or thoughtless, even if you think it.\n\nSuicidal people are already in a lot of pain and expressing any kind of disappointment in them can set them back even farther.\n\nEven saying things like \"How could you make us live without you?\" Which might imply you care, can make the person feel even worse of a burden on you.", "572" ], [ "You couldn't communicate. He couldnt just keep running in circles without being able to work towards a solution.\n\nSomeone mad that cant explain why (regardless of illness or autism or whatever) is extremely frustrating. It's like trying to calm down a toddler.\n\nGo back when you can figure out why you were mad.\n\nAnd its also one thing to not know how to properly express you are upset (understandable) and not know WHY you are upset. \n\nIt's not like people dont just get in bad moods sometimes. That happens. But it's their job to take care of it themselves", "52" ], [ "No you're not over reacting.\n\nHe is right that it is very hard to control at that moment to pull out. I have almost cum inside girls multiple times during the heat of the moment.\n\nKey word almost.\n\nWhere he screwed up is you made your intentions clear before this incident and many times during it. So as a responsible partner, even if he honestly couldnt control it in those last seconds, he should have known better than to get TO those last seconds.\n\nI know some will disagree but I dont think this is rape. Thst doesnt mean you dont have a right to be upset or that what he did was okay.\n\nAdvice would be to stop having sex period. I'm not one to jump on the 'dump someone immediately for a mistake' wagon but this could be something you cant move past and would be okay", "501" ], [ "There is always going to be some risk if you are their first. My gf and I have fairly regular threesomes, and guys tend to be a lot more comfortable when they find out that we've done it before. So that's a solid question.\n\nIf you ARE their first, it's good to reassure both the guy and the girl you have ZERO interest in coming between them. \n\nIF you play, go slow enough that they will have 100 chances to stop. Don't literally go from talking over beers to bending her over the couch. It may sound odd, but a guy can often get over his wife having a guy kiss her neck more easily than getting railed by him.\n\nWhat I'm saying is, unfortunately with threesomes, a lot of times the fantasy is fine but the reality hits hard. If it's their first time, make sure they have the power to stop before getting hurt.", "581" ], [ "I'm gonna go against the grain here and say yes, MAYBE!\n\nFirst, totally natural for you to want sex and be frustrated in a relationship where that is LITERALLY impossible. He's not withholding, he's not impotent but able to use toys. He cannot do ANY activities (if I'm understanding you).\n\nI don't know his condition, but if it's likely he will 'wake up' soon, then I would say tough it out. But I'm GUESSING, if he's been in this state for 8 months, this might be long term/permanent.\n\nWhat would you want if the situation was reversed? Also, what do you think HE would want for you?\n\nBut if your first part, about wanting to be faithful when he is back, also means it might be a good idea to find a partner you are not very attracted to, that you can immediately call off playtimes without conflicting thoughts.", "732" ], [ "This is why people dislike dating bisexuals sometimes. And before you think I'm hating, I am a bi guy that won't date a bi girl for exactly this reason.\n\nThat said, finding a girl for a threesome, while possible, is unlikely. Girls who hook up with couples are LITERALLY called unicorns. It's not up anymore, but if you looked on craigslist, for every ONE ad where a girl was looking for a couple (and most of those were probably bots or prostitutes anyway) you would literally have 1000 ads of couples looking for a woman to join them.\n\nMost likely, if it happens, it's gonna have to be someone you know, and hopefully, don't screw up your relationship. 2 times in my life I've had a girl join in a threeway, and one time it ended in a disaster that will take way too long to spell out.\n\nBut if open or breaking up are not options, honestly, you just need to suck it up and accept you can't have lesbian sex.\n\nI love shrimp. But my girlfriend is so allergic that even kissing her after eating shrimp hours ago makes her sick (not die fortunately). So I accept that to be with her, I give up something else I like.", "209" ], [ "Bi guy here that does MMF threesomes with his gf.\n\nWorst? We met up with a younger kid, early 20s (we are late 30s) from Craigslist. He was really questioning his sexuality. When we asked him what made him want to play with guys he said it was that he was molested, as an adult, by a roommate and was confused that he liked it, and wanted to explore. Kid didn't perform much, and when he left, he looked really guilty.\n\nBest? Older guy that wanted to see if I was able to get him off by blowjob without hands. At this point, I'd only given like 3 ever, so when I was able to do it, was a pretty good feeling. Also, my girlfriend right there helped. It was the first time someone came in my mouth, so she reached over, kissed me, and pulled out most of the load with her tongue since 'she was more used to swallowing cum'.", "1012" ], [ "Depends on age. I remember reading a story, wish I could remember where, where a young boy thought he was trans, and told his parents at like 8-9.\n\nThey were very supportive, and I guess got him into both counseling and hormone therapy.\n\nHowever, when he hit 13, he suddenly realized 'he wasn't a girl'. So he wanted to transition BACK. Fortunately, nothing had been done 'downstairs' yet but they did have to schedule a surgery to remove some breast tissue. \n\nI get being supportive, but on a decision that major, letting young kids tell you things like that can backfired. Hell, I wanted to be a girl for a long time when I was a kid, but it was mostly due to feeling like the 'odd man out' as almost all of our family and friends were women.", "292" ], [ "Maybe his hormones were already out of wack? \n\nI worked with a trans girl a few months back. She, at 20, was just starting hormone therapy. However, she told me she had her hormone levels checked prior to getting on hormones, and she said her doc said she was both in the bottom 10 & #37; for testosterone and top 10 & #37; for estrogen, as far as men go. \n\nI guess the only thing I COULD have misremembered in the article was they mentioned breast removal surgery, but MAYBE that was them saying that's one of the things that would have happened had he not changed his mind when he did.", "390" ], [ "It wouldn't have gone the way I'm hopefully imagining it, but there was this 19 year old coworker (I was 33ish at the time) that kept hitting on me. As in things like she forgot her wallet at work one day, I bought her a burrito, and she said if I'd let her, she'd blow me as thanks. \n\nLet's set aside the fact this girl puts blowjob and burrito at the same price point.\n\nShe was very aggressive. And I did think she was hot. But teen coworker. \n\nAnyway, we were friends for a few weeks after she quit, and I STARTED to consider acting on it. Maybe. I do have a girlfriend, but we've done three and foursomes so it's not like I was going to cheat. \n\nHowever, my gf never liked her. When <PERSON> (other girl) asked if I wanted to go out, and I said I had a girlfriend, she literally said \"That's just an obstacle.\"\n\nSo I had kinda brought up the threesome thing to <PERSON>, or rather, I mentioned my gf and I do that, and she texted back with \"OOOOH! I volunteer!\"\n\nI run it by gf, and she just gets this faraway look on her face. My gf is pretty straight. \n\nBut she says to me \"The only reason I'd agree to that is to hate fuck her with a huge strap on.\"\n\nI would have LOVED to see this. And neither girl was kidding about their point of view.\n\nHowever, in this case, I chose to pass. I think it would have been hot, but just knowing the other girl, I think it would have ended poorly.", "1012" ], [ "Relax.\n\nAlso, you don't want to hear this, but the rate of men failing to maintain erections in threesomes is around 50 & #37; So if your little soldier is asleep on the job, don't panic, but use other things, try to not think about it, and then you will MOST likely not have an issue. \n\nAre they friends or are they together? That second one might have some jealously issues come up. \n\nI have taken Cialis with moderate success for threesomes in the past.", "524" ], [ "Bi guy. I have 'phases' that can last days or weeks were I have a very strong preference for men. It never gets enough that I would feel like leaving my partner as they 'were not the right gender that week'.\n\nI did know a bi girl that broke up with her bf of 2 years because she missed lesbian sex, and he didn't want to open the relationship. She LITERALLY told him she was breaking up, planed to hook up with a girl or two over the next month, and if he wanted, they could get back together after.\n\nProps for not cheating, but I did find that cold. But I REALLY think that's rare.", "585" ], [ "I will say that is a new one to me. Never heard of it. \n\nBeing...dominated is a thing. Maybe it's kind of the same ball park mentally.\n\nThe closest example I've got in my life is I like being pegged. But I want the girl to be a bigger girl, because knowing I can fight her off really easily is a turn off, but if she's big enough she could 'win' a fight with me, it's more arousing to be submissive.", "331" ], [ "I don't understand why this is even a question. People masturbate. I KNOW some spouses have issues, but basically, if it's not hurting the relationship, it's fine.\n\nCurrent gf had an ex that would literally get out of bed if she tried to initiate, boot up porn, and jack off, saying 'this is easier'. THAT is an example of masturbation in a relationship being bad.\n\nBut in general, it's fine. I jack off and I'm sure my gf notices a lot of tissues in the trash. I've come home and found her toys out.\n\nI will say, the only time masturbation has hurt me, AND IT SUCKS IT'S HAPPENED TWICE is when for whatever reason, my gf (2 different girls for these occasions), masturbates, with a SOLID dildo, and then leaves it on my side of the bed. If I come in, and you are asleep, I'm not gonna turn on lights. But goddamn, plopping into bed and hoping for a soft pillow and instead taking 8 inches of ribbed (for her pleasure) glass to the face HURTS!", "524" ], [ "I hope it never happens, like, a spontaneous actual attack, but with the right partner, maybe they could arrange it for you?\n\nI've literally found a guy on craigslist, messaged him, told my gf to get dressed, and drove her to his house to blow a guy she didn't even knew existed 30 minutes ago. \n\nI'm working on getting her gangbanged. The logistics are a little harder, but possible.", "1012" ], [ "Sorry, I didn't mean to make light of something that obviously is weighing on you.\n\nMaybe think of it like this, and bring it up to her if need be.\n\nPeople have different NEEDS. Take food. If you are a 225lb man, you NEED more food than a 100lb woman. Sure maybe you can eat the same for a day, a week, a month, but it's going to take its toll.\n\nThere isn't anything wrong with the bigger person getting bigger portions, or an extra meal.\n\nThat's all this is. If you ARE having sex, you (hopefully) are at least getting the romantic need met, and you are just 'filling up' on the physical by yourself.", "993" ], [ "This would worry me for a few reasons.\n\nFirst, my gf and I occasionally sleep with other people. I started reading your post and went 'holy shit if he fucks <PERSON> his gf is gonna lose it' and then you said you did and she was okay, happy even. \n\nWhy she is happy about it matters far more than the fact it makes her happy.\n\nSo, first thing first, YES it is possible for this to be a good, happy, ongoing thing. Will it be in your situation? Dunno.\n\nSo, some concerns. First, you didn't mention it too much, but what does J feel about this? You're gf taking your friend into a threesome, sure, that happens, but if J LIKES you, you're gonna have a different issue you may not have thought of. If this goes south, you might lose <PERSON> totally. \n\nNot a doc, but your SO reaction to this sounds like it could be the mania side of bipolar. Going from generally depressed to having a 'passion' she has spent a lot of time working on (from what you said, her setting things up, pushing) as a clear, but not definite side, of mania.\n\nGoing from being angry you might have cheated in a very short time to....wanting to start a channel and finding escorts? There is SOMETHING wrong in her thought process.\n\nAgain, NONE of this is wrong IN THEORY. \n\nAs far as 'fucking with your brain' to have sex with one girl and tell another you love her? I don't have either of these people in my life right now, but HANDS DOWN the best kiss of my life was when my friend was blowing me, my girlfriend was sitting next to me asking if I was close, and her bending over, whispering, \"Cum in her mouth.\" And taking me into a deep kiss. Nirvana. I had SO MUCH LOVE for my girlfriend in that second (and after, of course) despite literally blowing my load in another girls face. Love can INCREASE in non-manogamous relationships, if handled correctly.", "1012" ], [ ".....I really don't think I was out of line with my question. Hard to tell from a short reply, and I apologize if this was not your intention, but that came across as snippy and confrontational to a question that was legit. \n\nNow, to answer, people are different. I've had girls I could literally just cover my dick in lube and shove in like a vagina. I've had girls that took 20 minutes of gentle massage with fingers/tongue to be able to receive. More often, it's a few minutes, but fingers might not be a good alternative to a smaller dildo. Reason is the way your fingers can bend, and the roughness of knuckles, can be a turn off. Ex wife was fine taking my cock (which is maybe JUST above average) but could not even take one finger comfortably due to the different....uh...design?\n\nHell, even once my ex wife managed anal sex, no lube. Not even spit or vaginal fluid. Only once, took time, but was hella impressive.\n\nAlso, enemas can be different too. I've had partners that I had anal sex 50 times with and maybe 10 of those times was there only the slightest trace of feces. (Never enemas) Others have come out pretty covered most times. In short, enemas are good, but there is the occasional downside of...enemas don't really feel sexy and doing one before sex can actually get people out of the mood.", "581" ], [ "And that's bad?\n\nGo find a college kid and school him in the art of Anal Pounding! Hell, dress up as a teacher! \"Today, you're gonna earn that A! Through your A-HOLE!\"\n\n.......\n\nI dunno why I typed that. I apologize.\n\n......\n\nIn seriousness, I think you're likely to find someone, statistically, that's okay with it. Hell, I got into it when my wife (that looking back, may have been manipulating me) saying her friend's husband asked her friend to buy a strap on, and what would my reaction be to that. I said I'd be down to try, and the rest is history.", "581" ], [ "That's the issue, and you're correct. \n\nI love gangbang porn as much as the next guy. CLOSEST we've come is a foursome where his wife was being fucked by me, blowing her husband, with my gf working her boobs. But we were all friends.\n\nBut I think with actual gangbangs, whether with friends or internet hookups, you gotta deal with the reality of a guy going 'shit, how comfortable am I hanging around a lot of other men, while we fuck one girl?' and going that maybe it's just easier to find a one on one hookup.\n\nMy HOPE, and rough PLAN, is to someday try to find a pair of bi guys. (I'm bi myself), but that way we can, whether or not there is MM play, find two guys that are comfortable/feel safe with each other, and me, for a total of 3. \n\nI mean, I wouldn't really mind, say, 4 or 5 for a gang bang. But 3 pretty much covers all bases. Three holes (if you're into that). Enough positions that people can rest if they need to.", "518" ], [ "Sooo, has he been, say, literally 95 days older it would magically become fine? That makes no sense.\n\nI don't know why you think this is weird. LOTS people have relationships with 10, 20, 30 years age difference. And they are HAPPY.\n\nHell, I knew a couple, that married at 21 and 13. Her parents literally had to drive across state lines because their state wouldn't allow marriage. \n\nWhen did I meet them? At 84 and 76. \n\nMaybe you're hung up on he had another partner. Maybe, (and this one is totally fine) you are hung up on maybe he doesn't make great decisions.", "429" ], [ "I knew a girl that succeeded with what you tried. She referred to herself as \"a reluctant lesbian\". She was 100% biologically heterosexual, but unfortunately was pretty violently raped and literally could not bring herself to touch, kiss, hug, men. Her body would go into fight or flight mode. \n\nShe decided, after years, she missed human touch enough to date and sleep with women, because she missed that connection.\n\nPossibly the only person I've heard of actually choosing their orientation.", "640" ], [ "Oh, yeah. Generally nothing bad is gonna happen. Some women get extra horny on their period. That blood is coming out later that day or the next day anyway. \n\nOnly thing I can really THINK might realistically happen is if you make your gf sore from sex, which most people like (kinda like workout sore) if she cramps heavily that might cause her more pain the next day.", "524" ], [ "So what's your point. 17 and 25 is HORRIBLE! But 18 and 36 is FINE! Because some random guys decided at some point to make an official law? That's how LAW works. Not ethics.\n\nI've met 12 year olds that could probably manage a marriage, career, and kids. I've met 24 year olds that I wouldn't trust to babysit my cat.\n\nThere is no 'magic number of days we've been traveling on this ball around the sun' that makes someone ready for sex, marriage, kids, a career, or fuck, flying a kite.\n\nThe example I gave, granted, I have no idea what those people were like back then. \n\nBut, as you said, social norms really never equals right.", "70" ], [ "Well, not me, but something I said to my partner, so my fault.\n\nI was doing my wife, hard, anally. Little dirty talk, nothing much \"You like that? Take it!\" \"Yeah, fuck me!\" That kind of stuff.\n\nFor whatever reason, I randomly remembered she once told me when she was younger, her grandmother called asses 'Bobos'.\n\nSo, in some weird haze, I yell out \"Yeah, you liked getting pounded in the bobo!\"\n\nShe stomped moving completely. Then burst out laughing so hard she 'pooped' me out with her convulsions.\n\nAfter around 30 seconds, she said that, well, sorry, but we are done for the night.", "875" ], [ "Slightly funny story, because of my ex wife being legally blind, she had INSANE hearing. \n\nShe was just my friend at the time, but was hanging out with a group of us. I made a joke at my gf's expense, (nothing bad, just cheesy) and she leaned in my ear and said, very quietly 'keep that up and no anal tonight'. \n\nMy friend immediately called, from across the room. \"Hey, you should tell your girlfriend not to whisper around blind people.\" Girlfriend turns beet red and spends the next 15 minutes in the bathroom.", "1012" ], [ "That's where 'aftercare' can come into play a lot.\n\nDiscuss hard limits. For GODS sake use a safe word. This sounds like a joke but if for whatever reason in the heat of the moment you can't remember it, two that work pretty well are yelling either 'safe word' or your ex's name.\n\nAs the submissive, you can have your entire fantasy fulfilled, and let your lover know, beforehand, that after, you want it to be back to the 'normal' relationship (equal partners, cuddling, etc)", "581" ], [ "I've got a couple.\n\nAs a hetero romantic bi guy (as in, like to sleep with guys on the occasion WITH my gf) having a guy cum in me. I just don't ever see dating a guy one on one, and random hookups, fwb situations we've had just don't seem worth the risk of not playing safely.\n\nFeeder play. As a guy that likes bigger girls, I love the idea of a forced funnel situation where I feed her thousands of calories of food. I like the idea of over time making her bigger and bigger.\n\nThe issue with that one is it's kind of at odds with itself. My gf is already at about the upper end of what weight should EVER be (she's a stockier build with a decent amount of muscle, it's not all fat) but if she increases her weight much more, it might start causing (down the line) issues.\n\nSo I GUESS the only way that would work would be to someday find a skinny girl that wants to be a fat girl (and I don't see that happening for at least 10 or so reasons).", "209" ], [ "This is one of those that is MUCH more common than most people think. This day and age, it's probably something fairly safe to bring up with gfs.\n\nHave had.....5 girls peg me. One was her idea, and enthusiastically. Two were mine but well received. One was 'eh, I don't really get anything out of it but I'll do it for you every once in a while'. Last was HER idea, said she had always been curious, but in the middle of the act, SHE stopped it, saying it was kind of weirding her out.", "1012" ], [ "You MIGHT be right, but sometimes fantasies like this are not so much about the gender, but about the POWER.\n\nFor example, I am into pegging (am guy). I also don't have a 'type' of women I like. Tall, short, skinny, fat, blonde, brunette, large boobs, small boobs, older, younger. Whatever. Do not care if I like you.\n\nBUT out of the 5 girls I've had use strap ons on me, two were skinny, one was a LITTLE overweight but short, and two were roughly my height but much heavier.\n\nI MUCH more enjoyed the pegging from the bigger girls. The feeling of strength they had, (one due to muscle, the other just sheer mass). I felt less in control, more submissive, more taken, and it had nothing to do with the gender. It was more the 'oh shit, if this girl WANTED to keep going when I said stop, I wouldn't be able to make her' that was the turn on.", "238" ], [ "If you don't mind me asking, how does that work, mentally, for a straight guy?\n\nI'm bi, and dabble in crossdressing, by which I mean I would not leave the house and it's all either for solo or, thankfully, play with my gf. Now, I admit I MIGHT have a different view if my body type would make me anywhere near passible, but voice is deep, and I love my facial hair too much :P\n\nBut all that said......I don't really get the 'straight crossdresser' thing. Like for me, (and I'm nowhere near trans), the crossdressing comes with being more feminine, more submissive, and more...uh...gay than straight at the moment?", "640" ], [ "Well, I don't know if this will be helpful or not, but one of my friends (straight, but we both know a lot of gay people) got into a VERY niche cam scene for awhile. \n\nPart of me kinda wishes I was joking, but I'm not. He would tape himself, neck down, masturbating. I've never seen it, but from some of his exes that I've also been friends with, he is REALLY well endowed. If you were one of his viewers, for a commission (I don't know how much) he would jack off into a sock and mail you the sock. And if you are curious, it was NOT women buying this.....\n\nWhile I don't have numbers, he said the money coming in vs the amount of work was really good. He finally stopped on the OFF chance he was somehow found out, as he noticed word of this spread through his social circle and he was worried about it getting to someone that might blackmail him.", "1017" ], [ "....I may have misunderstood something here, not just from you but in this thread.\n\nPeople used to say 'straight okay, homo bad, pedo bad'. Now people say 'straight okay, homo okay, pedo bad'. Nothing biologically has changed, just society. \n\nI may have misread something else in this thread. I have an issue with someone judging someone for something beyond their control. Hell, you want to go fuck a moose, that's your right to FEEL that was. Doing it is a different matter. \n\nI'm fine with a pedo liking themselves. I feel bad for ANYONE that has an urge, mental issue, whatever, that makes them feel 'less than'.", "418" ], [ "Totally my opinion, but I don't think it's rape. Disrespectful, sure. A red flag? Yup.\n\nHave you ever done any forceful roleplay? I did with a few exs, and once or twice it took a few seconds to realize that 'oh, stop really means stop'. But the situations I am referring to are more 'ow, that position hurts, let me shift' than 'stop, I want sex to end NOW'.\n\nNow, if you've NEVER done anything like that, it might be a bit worse.\n\nBut based on other replies I see you made, you are considering leaving him anyway, so......maybe it doesn't really matter?", "454" ], [ "Okay. Here's the thing. It's brutally honest and anyone who says otherwise is lying.\n\nEVERYBODY 'settles' for their partner. NO ONE gets their perfect 10 out of 10. EVEN IF they did, people change, both emotionally and physically.\n\nLife isn't a video game where you get to pick and choose.\n\nI do NOT think you are an ass for your views. At all. We all have our preferences.\n\nIn my current case, for example, I just celebrated our 5 year. We've fought 2 times. We have easy conversations. We have very similar views on religion, politics, ethics, and entertainment. We love being around each other. We have a great home.\n\nOur sex life is great, as we have all the same kinks.\n\nAnd....she is the least attractive girl I've been with. Not ugly, IMO, but overweight in a way I don't find sexy (I like bigger curvy girls, but she is a bit stocky, muscular, and....well....saggy in places.)\n\nThing is, I KNOW I will NEVER find someone else that lines up on every other front like she does. Doesn't mean I cant find happiness, just that it won't be as great.\n\nThink about it this way, as you are asking for advice on not just a sex partner, but possibly a life partner: What PERCENTAGE of the time in your lives/relationship is her having big breasts going to matter? Vs what percentage of having the 'fight the problem/not person?'", "993" ], [ "It can be tricky because I have used this term to refer to perfectly logic things and absolutely ridiculous things.\n\n\"Trans people have a right to healthcare.\" Great. Makes sense.\n\n\"Trans people have a right to use whatever bathroom they feel most comfortable.\" Um....okay. I can see some arguments for an against, but sure, we can compromise here.\n\n\"Trans people have the right to go to the prison of there professed gender.\" Full stop no. An argument could me made for someone who has had extensive surgery but a 220 pound 6'4 fully biologically male doesn't suddenly get to say at sentencing he has always been a female on the inside and should go to a women's prison.\n\nI think the basic thought is usually meant to mean that any rights a cis person has a trans person should have. And yet it does get muddy in the details.", "847" ], [ "Jesus. Look at my karma. My throwaway is used for controversial topics since my main one is tied to writing, abuse recovery, and games.\n\nDid you not look up farther on the thread? I said I was the VICTIM of a non violent sexual assault but it was frustrating because since people don't see it as dangerous I'm not a true victim.\n\nI apologize for being insulting but you completely misread what I was trying to get across: that men can be victims (women too) even if violence doesn't come into it.", "181" ], [ "Eesh. I cringe at what you wrote.\n\nYes I have been 'harassed' a few times by girls I'm not interested, and as a guy it's usually not more than an annoyance. \n\nBut the fact that cute girls can get away with things is infuriating. \n\nI read on here a few months ago about a guy who was full on raped by a girl because she followed him into a room, scratched herself, then said if he DID NOT fuck her she would run out crying screaming that he tried to rape her. \n\nNo court in the would would have believed him.", "331" ], [ "It kinda depends on what you consider aliens.\n\nI personally think it's highly unlikely that there are not SOME alien species like us, just given the size of the universe. But even if you discount intelligent aliens, it's very likely that other planets have developed some basic cellular organisms.\n\nClaiming there is a GOD that created everything is a bit of a jump in logic. (Am agnostic, I'm not sure either way)\n\nBut saying that just because, I don't know, you think intersteller travel is impossible means there are no 'space ants' somewhere doesn't quite hold up.", "366" ], [ "What the fuck? A soldier is not a hero (by default)\n\nA soldier CAN be a hero. So can a librarian. Pisses me off to no end that some soldiers (far from all) get a free pass. In fact many soldiers are embarrassed when thanked for their service because they see it as just a job.\n\nThere's kind of a running....maybe gag isn't the right word but phrase of \"I'm not a hero but I served with some.\"\n\nFor all you know she died peeing her pants hiding behind cover. Which is not dishonorable necessarily but for sure doesn't make up for what she did.\n\nAnd this is all before you realize that American soldiers are not automatically heroes to non americans.\n\nYou don't need to piss on her grave but I don't think you would be faulted for dancing on it a little.", "920" ], [ "Legally yes, but it wouldn't surprise me if one local theatre is just trying to fly under the radar.\n\nHell it's even possible they tried to get permission and the studios were like 'hell just go for it'. If its one screen and one showing you'd be looking at such a small royalty check for the studio they probably wouldn't even consider going to court over it, IF anyone even told them.\n\nCompare this to say, a theatre a studio had an ongoing relationship- with and was constantly asking for the newest movies and then stopped. That would be a flag something fishy was going on.", "321" ], [ "It's not. Or rather its not complicated. \n\nCalories out have to be more than calories in to lose weight.\n\nSome common misconceptions leading to people claiming the 'just can't lose the weight'\n\n1) Check your calories. I used to, when going to work, grab a 'lite' breakfast of three small burritos. Didn't even fill me up. Checking the restaurants website one day showed me I was eating 1200 calorie breakfasts and still being hungry!\n\n2) There are 3500 calories in a pound. So to lose weight it requires burning a lot more calories than you think. Go for a three mile run every single morning? Great! Thats about a pound lost every 12 days.\n\n3) Because humans don't want to starve we often develop hunger when working out. Many a person has failed their weight lost journey by hitting the gym every day, burning 500 calories, then overeating by 1000 calories because they are 'famished'.\n\n4) Liquids are calorie nightmares. Hell technically most beer is healthier than juice if calorie counting. Don't drink your calories is a common diet mantra. Carbonated water, unsweet tea, and lightly flavored coffees are the exception.\n\n5) This one is my opinion, but most people seem to try to do one of two things when losing weight. Workout like a beast or starve themselves. Both are....not wrong but bring their own problems.\n\nLets say you want to lose a pound every four days. Thats 875 calories you have to cut. Burning that at the gym is almost 90 minutes of intense cardio. Cutting that from your diet is usually one whole meal. Both are hard to stick to.\n\nBut say you cut out your usually heavy lunch for a light snack and then hit the gym for 45 minutes a day, splitting the difference. Neither will seem as daunting as one extreme (for most people)\n\nFinally, it takes time. I lost 80 pounds in six months. People were amazed at the progress. But that accomplishment came with calorie counting every meal and 2-3 hours at the gym every day with no days off. Also completely sobriety and no soda or sweets at all. \n\nSimple? Piece of (diet) cake. Easy? Nope, was hard work every day.", "35" ], [ "You can legally use force but not excessive force. So something like flicking his face or gently pulling his hair (assuming he is still latched on and you are trying to 'end the threat' ) is probably reasonable. \n\nIf you are even a preteen or older a punch will likely be seen as too aggressive. And if the bite has already ended and he is not continuing to attack you, you likely cannot do anything legally besides walk away.", "955" ], [ "In the US, currently all states have safe haven laws. \n\n[_URL_0_](_URL_1_).\n\nThese allow people (with varying restrictions and time limits based on state) the ability to surrender kids legally they do not want. \n\nOne such thought is without these laws women would simply hide pregnancy and toss kids in a river for example.\n\nUnless these laws changed too things should be fine. We would likely see an increase in illegal abortions as well as women doing things like throwing themselves downstairs and starving themselves as well.", "409" ], [ "I regret shutting down a game of truth or dare with a boy in high school. \n\nI'm bi now but took me forever to come out. I think he was trying to come out to me that night (I didnt like him like that but kids fool around) and think he was trying to find an outlet. \n\nThe sleepover had progressed from watching Star wars clips on line to him showing me a porno mag (back in dial up times) to a truth or dare I shut down when he wanted to anally penetrate me with a finger.\n\nI regret it because I think it might have been better for both of us in the long run to safely experiment. And I honestly was curious. But my religious upbringing wouldnt let me do it. And I pulled way back from him after that night. \n\nDunno if he ever came out or not", "751" ], [ "Primal? First threesome.\n\nIn danger? Getting hit with a bullet ricochet and not knowing if I just got a small piece of shrapnel or was actually shot. (Was shrapnel. Tore my face but just a little blood)\n\nTime slowing down? Seeing a car wreck coming two seconds before impact. I swear it felt like ten minutes.\n\nMost wanting to protectile every food I'd ever eaten? Finding our my wife was cheating on me", "481" ], [ "My question is specifically for the people who havent transitioned much if at all.\n\nI worked with a ....guy at the beginning of his employment to girl by the end and knew them as both. But they wanted to start using a girls name ad pronouns months before doing any HRT or appearance changing. She was short and had longish hair but was still very obviously born male (she did develop a higher voice and boobs over time) \n\nBut I cant see anyone who would have met her as she was introduced to me the first time wouldnt be gay for being attracted to her (or straight if a girl)", "751" ], [ "She thought I wanted to go to a strip club for my eighteenth birthday due to a stupid rumor my friend started. \n\nWhen I said it wasnt true she said \"Bullshit. You just want to go see those big breasted bimbos.\"\n\nMy genius brain snapped back with what I said in the previous post. I wasnt thinking clearly but meant no I'll intent", "1012" ], [ "Oof. I wish I had better advice.\n\nIf she was a young child it could be a lesson about death. But doesnt seem to be the case.\n\nIs she religious at all? If she believes in an afterlife she will never be older than her brother.\n\nIf she doesnt.......hmmmm.\n\nMaybe.....no....I have nothing that doesnt sound insensitive.\n\nI wish you the best. Every idea I have sounds wrong trying to type it", "981" ], [ "Truly sorry. I cant think of anything that would make her feel better.\n\nJust tell her that her brother wouldnt want her to be sad. If shes a lighthearted person maybe tell her that now she had big shoes to fill as the older sibling?\n\nCan you maybe.....I dunno. Find an old photo of him and a current one of her and photo shop them together, as if they took the photo? \n\nShow her hes not completely gone?", "650" ], [ "A few reasons.\n\nSometime you can be wanting to give someone something towards a major purchase. Like if you know they want a new TV and are saving for it you can give them a bit of help.\n\nSometimes it's nice to treat someone to an experience. Like a gift card to a restaurant they probably would like but never spend the money on.\n\nSometimes its to help them out with necessities....but maybe you do worry about spending habits. So you buy a gift card to a grocery store and not just give cash.", "710" ], [ "There is a running joke (and I've even had a few of my lesbian friend say it) that all lesbian relationships come with a set of uhaul keys.\n\nLesbians tend to rush into long term relationships faster than either straight or gay men. \n\nStatistically these are more likely to fail and fail more spectacularly if too many things (finances, living situations, pets, kids) get mixed in.\n\nSo a 19 year old proposing is already a sign most people would be wary of. If it's a lesbian its even more likely that it is an overly emotional and premature decision", "209" ], [ "I was actually in the pro <PERSON> camp through most of the game (didnt play but watched the whole playthrough)\n\nI knew it was controversial. But figured I'd give it a chance.\n\nIt made relative sense until you were forced to kill a LOT of people, including your former friends, just because they didnt like the one actual transgender person they put in the game.\n\nIt made no sense for <PERSON> to kill people she grew up with because they were trying to kill this one person (who was part of a group of her peoples enemies)\n\nAnd to make it worse this trans person killed their own mother and you were supposed to see it as justified because she didnt like her kid was trans.\n\nIt just became a shitshow. I would never play a last of us three game because no game in history somehow managed to piss off people from so many viewpoints at once", "1011" ], [ "Could be. In my experience bi girls are less selective about cheating.\n\nAll that said, a lot of people when they tell you they are taken, they assume that means you will NOT misinterpret things like hugs and friendly texts as interest, and they are just outgoing.\n\nIf she was doing all that without disclosing her relationship status I would think she is into you.\n\nAlso she might just find you attractive and fun to be around but not interested in the slightest in dating.", "640" ], [ "Had an ex call me up during a dry spell in dating. We ended well so I saw no issue with going for dinner and a beer.\n\nShe was being kinda flirty and while I was seeing someone (non exclusively) I was a bit uncomfortable with her flirtations.\n\nI mentioned I wasnt interested in getting back together but just wanted to see her.\n\nShe laughed, said all she wanted to do was get some italian food, get some beers, catch up, and have me take her back to her place and fuck her up the ass. No strings attached.\n\nSucceeded on all fronts. Hell I'd have been happy with just the beer.", "1012" ], [ "No, someone made a business decision and profited off it. Just like every artist or store in existence.\n\nPeople by things based on what they are worth to them, not to the seller. \n\nIf anyone is to blame it's the people buying the inflated prices systems. Think about it. If some guy bought consoles and everyone refused to buy them he would have thousands of dollars in paperweights. \n\nBut the buyers think the sellers are the problem when the buyers are at least half as responsible", "618" ], [ "The sheer inability of people to do this math just boggles the mind. Its not even so much about the entitlement. Its just grade school math and physics. \n\nCant remember if it was this sub or not but there was a post about two ladies going into a sandwich shop in the middle of the afternoon with one employee working, ordered 90 sandwiches, and were appalled when they couldnt get out of there in ten minutes.\n\nLike how fast do you think someone can physically work?", "941" ], [ "Whether I would ever get anal sex. I'd always wanted to try it but had planned to stay a virgin (including anal) until marriage. So I figured it was going to be pure luck if I found a girl who would be into anal.\n\nWell turns out my college girlfriend was so annoyed by my marital stance that she threw this belief in my face and said she would do anal only and I might not get another chance if my future wife didnt want to.\n\nShe talked me into it. But no regrets.", "1012" ], [ "Someone called an ambulance on me once. I was having a bad reaction to a new med and was a bit confused. I wasnt able to answer all their questions appropriately so they said I had to go.\n\nI knew enough to go so as to not be escorted in by police. However I gave them no information besides my first name, lied and said I didnt have my wallet, refused to sign any paperwork, and as soon as they rolled me into the ER (and was probably the adrenaline jolt but I was coming around) I told the first nurse I saw I was walking out and not signing anything. \n\nShe looked shocked but said \"I wont stop you.\" Walked right out the front door.\n\nTotal cost: $15 bucks on the uber I spent to get where I started from (which was also thankfully not my house so they had no info)\n\nDamned if I was going to get a four digit bill for something I didnt even want or need", "42" ], [ "I mean eventually yeah. Humans just like any other species has an expiration date. We just dont know what our extinction event will be.\n\nHell tomorrow a strain if COVID could mutate into something with a 30% fatality rate and we would be fucked.\n\nClimate change will more likely knock us down a few pegs and reduce the world population and standard of living at some point but likely wont kill the entire race", "795" ], [ "Also a person may belief by going vegan themselves they are making the difference but if they just give a cat away the new home/owner is just going to feed them meat anyway. And as mentioned, killing the pet for veganism is counter productive to most vegans.\n\n\nThough I am sure there are probably some vegan extremists that think all carnivores are evil and should be exterminated", "909" ], [ "As others have said public places are fair game. \n\nJust imagine the headaches otherwise. If you were trying to televise a basketball game and had to get the personal permission of every single patron? Never could work.\n\nBasically it got scaled down to anywhere the public can be freely the public can be recorded.\n\nIn private residences it gets trickier. Some areas are a little gray (like can you record a guest in your house that you invited) \n\nAlso some states have requirements that a recording of audio (including phone calls) must have both participants permission. \n\nFinally one thing that I've never gotten a clear answer on is what happens during a crime? Say it's in your house and your mother hits your father. Technically he can claim he doesnt consent but I'm guessing that the police may see it differently. They could, for example, use the video as reason to escort the husband away but maybe it wouldnt be admissible in court. (If someone knows for sure please correct me)", "260" ], [ "In general yes. If something is gory it is not necessarily illegal. (Accidents happen, animals attack, natural disasters strike)\n\nIf it is a crime being committed FOR the act of making a video you might run into some questionable legality.\n\nFor example seeing a security video of a man pushing someone into traffic was not made for the purpose of spreading gore, it just so happened a camera caught it.\n\nHowever a guys friend with a cell phone recording the incident saying \"push him!\" Might fall under different statues.", "903" ], [ "I mean the two first ideas that come to mind are switch docs (easier said than done) but I would also try to research on if it's personal rule for their practice or a statewide restriction.\n\nSecond is set up a recording of the whole thing but that also may not be allowed by law or policy.\n\nThird idea, speakerphone during whole thing? I think the policies on that would be different than video", "123" ], [ "I have learned the hard way (and this sounds horrible) to take women's stories of rape when it comes to dating them with a grain of salt.\n\nBut the problem is if the story changes a lot, it can be a very good sign she is spinning either a consensual act into a horrific one, or at best maybe something she regrets and has played it up as worse for herself and her friends that lying about it has just come naturally.\n\nAs one or two others have said, five years from now she will be telling the story of how you raped her. And it just takes one wrong person to hear that for your life to change.", "878" ], [ "That's always blown my mind about competition at that level. I just cant imagine literally devoting my whole life to something and the difference between a life of luxury and fame is like .2 seconds on a clock or jumping just 1 inch shorter or making a landing that some random judge for a reason they probably couldn't even fully explain gave me slightly less <PERSON>'s than my competitor.", "328" ], [ "Few reasons.\n\nMany of these places were built way before anyone knew this was going to be a huge issue.\n\nGiven that some people say gender is a spectrum there would be people I am sure would say three isnt even enough.\n\nSince it's not strictly a need, and adding a new room, especially with plumbing would be HELLA expensive there is no financial reason to do this.\n\nForth and the most logical thing is just make all bathrooms everywhere unisex but people are going to complain about that too.", "670" ], [ "History is written by the winners is kind of the simple answer.\n\nA slightly more specific reason to your particular example is it was much easier for both sides in the colonial war to just part ways after the cessation of hostilities. That huge ocean and all that. We had no interest in taking the fight across the sea.\n\nThe union absolutely wanted to keep the southern territories. And as I said not quite as clear of a border from a geographical perspective.", "773" ], [ "\"If someone cant find a job I don't see why they just dont go back to school, get a degree, and apply for better jobs.\"\n\n<PERSON> was 27, very sheltered from a wealthy family, and had no clue that you need income for the time you're in school. \n\nKick on top was he thought all colleges everywhere in the U.S (where he lived) were free. He thought they were like public libraries, just walk in, grab books and sign up for whatever classes you want.", "108" ], [ "People here literally die daily from it. You even get to pick how!\n\nMany cheaply made required drugs like insulin are costed higher than a car payment. \n\nMental healthcare is so expensive it lead to drug addiction, violence, and suicide. \n\nPeople sometimes die with serious symptoms because they dont think an ambulance is worth it when they can drive. \n\nMedications are so expensive people sometimes half or reduce the dose to once every three or four days to stretch it out.\n\nScans can run tens of thousands just to FIND OUT what is wrong, let alone treat it.\n\nDoctors are forced to recommend less effective treatments with higher downsides due to income.\n\nAnd even people with Savings and healthcare can lose their homes and entire retirement just on a three day hospital stay!", "36" ], [ "I dated a legally blind girl for years.\n\nWhile it had no bearing on our eventually breaking up, shit got old fast. Was the only driver for years. Had to constantly adjust either housing or her job to account for travel in an area where there was no public transportation worth mentioning.\n\nShe hated walking everywhere even that she could because she could only see a few feet in front of her.\n\nSafety was an issue as she couldnt run fast enough for enough for her eyes to keep up.\n\nShe had to sit right in front of the TV no matter how big so watching movies or shows new to her were almost impossible with more than one other viewer just due to the angle.\n\nLots of hobbies I liked she just couldnt share in.\n\nI'm sure I can think of more but yeah it wasnt fun. I wouldnt leave someone if they became that impaired but I wouldnt enter into a relationship with someone with that disability again.", "585" ], [ "Problem is meat can be bad in two ways. First is all the little microorganisms on them can reach high levels and cause illness in humans. \n\nGood news. Safe cooking temps stop this.\n\nSecond way is all the waste those organisms produce. \n\nBad news. To break down this waste requires temps that generally make the food inedible.\n\nThe first is more of an illness if you got sick. The second is more like getting poisoned.", "740" ], [ "Dated a girl who told me she couldn't tell me if her number was in the 2 or 3 digits. Couldnt care less, BECAUSE she was honest with me.\n\nI dont think you are wrong for being upset she lied, but we all have a past. If you cant deal with hers, IMO, that's okay. You are allowed to pick your partners and also have things you wont deal with. I myself will not date bi girls. I am allowed to not date someone who is bi, or who has a past I cant deal with. What I am not allowed to do is SHAME them for it.\n\nAlso IMO the only other thing you are allowed to press a past partner for is if they were ever a cheater. I'd date a girl that screwed 1000 guys before I would date a girl that had only slept with two but one was an affair.", "901" ], [ "He deserves to know, for a LOT of reasons.\n\nOne, this wasnt in your past, it was during your relationship. So presumably, and understandably, your behavior is going to probably be different towards sex as well as even just physical touch for awhile. He deserves to know the reason.\n\nTwo, if you continue to be sexual with your boyfriend, he deserves to know that you may have been exposed to STIs.\n\nThree, god forbid you get pregnant anytime soon, either from the incident or your boyfriend, but he has the right to know if the child might not be his.\n\nFour, being a partner to someone with PTSD is ROUGH. I have dated women with it, and I have a mild form of it myself. A partner should always know when something in the relationship might be a deal breaker, or at least something that will make the relationship harder.\n\nFive, and this one sucks. Sounds like you were at a group event. This means that someone, whether the guy who assaulted you or someone else, might start spreading it around. And if their story is that it was consensual and gets back to your boyfriend, now he might think you cheated on him. And there are girls that do cry 'rape' after the fact to protect themselves. (Had it personally happen to me before anyone says I'm perpetrating false stereotypes) so then he will have to decide \"Am I dealing with a cheater and a liar or a repeat rape victim\"? That's a horrible position to put him in.\n\nSix and final, and this also sucks....some people just dont want to have a relationship with a lot of extra weight on it. I was with a disabled girl for years and I admit I wasnt a saint always with it but the constant modifications to our home, our activities, our living situation, our expenses, that came with it started to drive us apart. And she was not at fault, I knew everything before getting into the relationship. I just somehow didnt process it would be every day.\n\nSo yes. Tell your boyfriend for all the reasons I outlined. I do believe you will feel better after you do. Maybe not right after, but regardless of his reaction, at least you wont be wondering.", "591" ], [ "Tried an open relationship once and have seen a couple of friends do the same. It always has the same result.\n\nThe women are able to find men, often the same DAY, being completely honest. Think about it.\n\n\"Wait, so we can hook up, but there is no expectation of emotional support? I can just not call you for a week but then maybe we go on a date and I get laid? And I never have to worry about us moving forward or moving in together or anything? Sweet!\" As guys line up around the block.\n\nFor a guy, unless you are handsome and rich as fuck...\n\n\"Wait, so you have a girlfriend and you just want me as a side piece, that you may not even really pay attention to since you are literally only wanting sex, it's not even an affair where I might get some emotional satisfaction out of it? Pass!\"\n\nNot saying for sure your gf did this on purpose, but some women know that proposing an open relationship is getting a free pass to cheat.", "971" ], [ "Exactly. I used to be against smoking because I thought it was a waste of money, dangerous, etc. As I got older I got less judgemental and realized people should be allowed to do what they want. \n\nBut even the most respectful 'never smokes near me or in homes or cars and always throws their butts away' smoker always smells ABSOLUTELY disgusting to me.\n\nI've dated one smoker in my adult years and it was wretched. Didnt matter if she used perfume and brushed her teeth after I could still smell it and especially in her hair. I would sometimes literally gag after kissing her.", "568" ], [ "Your ambulance may not be fully stocked.\n\nOld job but found this out the....fun...way. we had just done a drop off and got stopped by a state inspector for a random inspection. He found a lot of stuff missing, some expired, some duplicates. \n\nTo be clear most of that stuff was VERY situational and not used often at all. And our company TRIED to maintain inventory by sealing cabinets with tags. If you needed something youd pop the cabinet, record the item, and restock and reseal at the end of the day.\n\nAnyway my partner and i were terrified when mistakes started coming up. The inspector finished, said all in all it wasnt that bad even with the infractions, and he had seen much worse.\n\nOur company got a fine of course.\n\nScary thing when I asked my supervisor about it?\n\n\"Heres the thing. It takes 2 people about 2 hours to inventory the box top to bottom. Our company would just rather pay the occasional fine then pay the extra labor to have people inventory the unit every day \"", "237" ], [ "I called my cats my kids, but it wasnt out of....any kind of familial bond with them. Mostly it was because I am child free and despise human children (for the most part. I dont hate them, I just cant stand to be around them) and I considered my cats way cooler than actual kids \n\nSo it would mostly come up in situations like \"Oh you're getting to the age you should already be getting ready for kids!\" And I would say \"already have two! Great fur babies!\" Mostly just to get people to leave me alone.", "287" ], [ "I have to downvote this because you are not stating an unpopular opinion. You are stating a falsehood.\n\nSure there are situations where one party can be 100% in both the legal and moral right.\n\nBut there are plenty of situations where you can have opposing views and no one is completely wrong. Say an employee does something against policy on a whim but whatever they did was good for business, increased productivity, whatever. But they violated policy so they are punished.\n\nEmployee view: But what I did helped the company!\n\nEmployer view: But it was a risk that might have hurt the company. And also if people start hearing they can just violate policy whenever they want and hope it works out, someone could make a large and possibly dangerous mistake.\n\nBoth views to me have substance.", "230" ], [ "Yeah my mom was a heavy smoker growing up. It sucked as none of my friends smoked or came from families that did. When I was still living at home and going to college I got real sick of having to shower and wash whatever clothes I was going to wear RIGHT before I left the house because friends started telling me how bad I smelled like smoke when hanging out. I couldn't even tell anymore.\n\nWasnt until I lived in a smoke free home for like six months that I started to have the sense of smell come back to how bad it was. Now I cannot tolerate it at all.", "568" ], [ "I get that. I was on similar terms with my mom when she passed. Hit me harder than I thought it would. I do believe you are completely justified in asking your wife to not share those sentiments around you, just as long as you are not faulting her for having her feelings.\n\nI'm sorry for your loss, even if the loss is similar to mine, in that you grieve for the parent you WISH you had, and the fact that the relationship can never be repaired.", "900" ], [ "I personally think the COVID reasoning is kind of silly, but I completely agree with not wanting a seemingly endless parade of strange men coming through your home, especially even B having almost no knowledge of them. What if one of them takes advantage of her after she changes her mind? What if he gets drunk and starts stumbling around and breaking stuff? Etc.\n\nThis might seem kind of childish,, but what about a rule where all guests have to be introduced to all roommates? We had this as a kind of unofficial guideline at one of my residences. If your brought someone over (anyone not just dates) you would introduce them to the roommates. Even if its just a \"Hey <PERSON>, this is my roomie <PERSON>\". It let's people get a vibe on who is in their home and if something is really off gives you a reason to kick them out. Also if a creepy guy knows hes going to have to make a bunch of introductions he might decline in the first place.\n\nAnother suggestion is that if she had been the ONLY one having guests over lately (or at least a vast majority of the time) tell her that you and A are just sick of the place being violated and that for the next bit of time if she wants she has to take them somewhere else.", "698" ], [ "Tactics ROCKS. Probably the console game I've sunk the most hours into over the course of my life. \n\nCustomization is amazing. Story line is awesome (though a bit heavy handed compared to other FF games)\n\nOnly two complaints. Near the end if you know what you are doing (and use a certain character) the game takes a massive downward spike in difficulty.\n\nThe other is there is one pair of battles, near the end of the second act I believe, that you are given a chance to save between. However the next battle is a one on one fight and unless you gave your main character certain non intuitive skills, is unbeatable. Myself and three other people I know made the mistake of only keeping one save slot and had to restart the whole game because of it.", "14" ], [ "<PERSON>.\n\nWithout knowing exactly how every conversation went, it could truly be a misunderstanding on your gfs part that <PERSON> was a bio female and depending on your language could have been misconstrued as you intentionally misleading her (I dont think you did though)\n\nI do find her reaction a little extreme given your bi, but can someone explain how this is possibly 'biphobic' at ALL? Shes dating a bisexual and presumably has no issues with it. She is worried, however incorrectly, about another biological female around her boyfriend, so that strikes me as the opposite of biphobic.\n\nTransphobic? A stretch but maybe.", "603" ], [ "This is flawed reasoning. Let's say his brother wanted to spend that money on his dream car instead and the brother told him that he would be willing to spend the money on a nice reliable economy car instead. The brother is upset that he wasnt shelling out money for his top of the line Tesla.\n\nYou wouldnt be saying he valued money and judgement over the relationship then.", "49" ], [ "Helping out family is buying them groceries, maybe even paying their rent or buying them a used car if they need one desperately. Helping out family is not paying for a completely elective procedure that as the brother even said, may produce zero results. Heck if you paid for plastic surgery at least you would get a guarantee of something.", "974" ], [ "That fight sucked. I usually got around it with auto potion and Ramzas squire skill that boosted his speed. If you could run around auto healing you eventually got to the point you could get like 6 turns to Wiegrafs one. And this would carry over til the next fight.\n\nThen you hit the rooftop IIRC and had a whole different kind of crap to deal with.", "190" ], [ "I appreciate the advice!\n\nI'll say, generally speaking, even a a guy doing gay play, I've been more sensitive and less rough. I have some gay friends that completely blow my previous understandings of gay sex out the window.\n\nWas roommates with two gay guys (not together) for awhile. One day, they didn't know me or my girlfriend was there they were going at it in their room, door closed, so all good. But MAN, the INTENSITY of what they were screaming at each other was crazy. Not just the words, but the emotion. They both sounded like they were....I dunno....screaming a a guy trying to tow their car.\n\nI'll admit, my gf and I listened for a few seconds before deciding that 'hey, a burger sounds awesome right now!'. \n\nBut it was very masculine. That's not what I want to do with men. \n\nAnd this man seems like he is willing to be what I need him to be. Possibly sweet and caring at first, rougher later if it goes that way. And I WANT to please him. \n\nI'm hetero romantic, which I'm not sure if it will be an issue in a sissy journey, but in this case, I like that I (hopefully if he doesn't change his mind) can have a bit of safety in losing my cherry virginity to someone I have, not feelings for, but trust in. \n\nI've heard some horror stories, ranging from complete disregard for boundaries to full on rape, of sissies having a first time partner that treats them wrong.", "1012" ], [ "So, it took me a LONG time (six years) to finally proposed to my current gf after a divorce.\n\nSome of my thought process in the first 5ish years was this. I had never, ever thought I would be divorced. EVER. I knew of 2 things, cheating and violence towards me or any future children. And I thought my wife incapable of that. (She MAY have cheated, but denies it to this day, so that's kind of a side issue).\n\nThing was, an event came up that I could never have forseen (long story short tried an open marriage that went sideways fast) and one day I realized I was with someone, and our situation had gotten so screwy, so out of hand, that there was no way we could fix it and BOTH be happy. \n\nBut since the reason for divorcing didn't hit one of the dealbreakers I have, I had a lot of conflicting emotions about getting engaged again. What if something different came up between us that I didn't foresee? \n\nOn top of that, while not married a second time yet, I had been saving for a ring for a girl I was dating and raising her child. In hindsight the breakup coming from her should have been obvious but it hit me out of the blue so that didn't help.\n\nNone of this means I don't value my partner and think of her as my other half. And while I have proposed, so it's not exactly the same situation, I was content to have a forever girlfriend. \n\nSo...advice? Understand that sometimes labels are just labels and he doesn't want that one.", "585" ], [ "Sadly, this issue has ended thousands if not millions of relationships over the years.\n\nI personally share her views, but my partner and I have been upfront since day 1 neither of us wants kids. Now, she is of course able to change her mind. (My partner or yours)\n\nHowever, you CANNOT compromise on this issue. If a long term relationship goes forward long enough and one is 100% committed to having children and the other isn't, one will go from irritated, to angry, to miserable, to resentful. Eventually. And between the two options, if this incompatiblity exists, the worse option is having a child with a best case scenario of a broken home and a worse case of having a parent incapable of loving them.\n\nI wouldn't break up yet. Support your GF, do not invalidate her feelings, possibly even reexamine some of your own.\n\nBut this issue is 100% a dealbreaker. \n\nWhere I do get worried is your use of the word 'betrayed'. Nothing she's done is wrong. She isn't doing something malicious to you.", "774" ], [ "Knew someone in a similar situation. Their old girlfriend that they maintained a relationship with was about to get married and they asked me if they should tell her they still had a crush on her. To be fair, he wasn't like head over heels or anything so I was basically able to tell him \"Look dude, seriously think about that. What is your BEST CASE scenario here?\" (I didn't know her well and didn't know her relationship dynamic but felt it wasn't important). \n\nThe one thing I told him that he hadn't thought about was 'what if she tells her fiance? What will his reaction be? Even if SHE is okay with it, he may not'.\n\nHonestly wasn't a close friend and haven't seen him in years (probably won't) so I don't know if he ultimately decided to say anything. But I just....I can't imagine a good outcome.", "591" ], [ "As the teacher, a threesome with one of my students and my girlfriend.\n\n(All adults, student was actually slightly older than me). We'd been working on stuff together a lot, she took me to dinner to thank me, and randomly blurted out 'hey if you ever want to have a threesome with me, I am game'. \n\nYes, I know that sounds like a bs troll post but it actually happened. Then led to a very very toxic time in my life so yeah it's not really a happy memory to be honest.", "1012" ], [ "Small tools, knives, etc are dangerous as fuck.\n\nThere was a police video in my area that went viral on 'police brutality' because an officer shot a man who wouldn't drop a screwdriver and people were saying 'it was just a screwdriver!'\n\nI can absolutely kill you in 2 seconds from 5 feet with a screwdriver. Yeah, you likely won't drop instantly but it's very very deadly. \n\nSomeone doesn't have to be holding an axe or assault rifle in front of you to be a true danger.", "955" ], [ "See, I've even done something like that myself recently and won't ever again.\n\nI am in a committed relationship with some odd boundaries. <PERSON> knows I am poly, but knows I don't NEED that to be happy. \n\nFor some reason, am guy, a lesbian friend and I developed large crushes on each other. We kinda said to each other we had feelings at the same time, so that wasn't awkward, but then as things moved forward, she got conflicted about her feelings and it just hasn't been the same since.", "585" ], [ "Some things just...need to die. \n\nI personally find it more cruel to lock up someone forever. And if you look at some of the conditions in supermax prisons, you basically have a guy in a small concrete room, alone for usually 23 hours a day, a few meals, and he doesn't even have the option of suicide (easily). That's MORE cruel than just a firing squad or gas chamber.", "279" ], [ "I would LOVE more details on that. \n\nHad this one girl hitting on me at work once (total slut, nice girl, just willing to sleep with anyone giving her attention. Offered me a blowjob because I bought her a taco bell burrito once). She tried to get me to come over, and when I told her I had a girlfriend, she said 'well, that's just an obstacle'\n\nGirlfriend didn't take it well. A few weeks later, the girl offered a threesome instead. Out of pure curiosity, I asked my girlfriend her thoughts (as we had considered having one and actually thought, oddly, she'd rather do it with someone we both disliked than someone you would get feelings for)\n\nShe paused, narrowed her eyes, and said \"Only if I can hate fuck her with a strap on\". \n\nNo, we never went through with it, but my girlfriend wasn't making a joke. She said the idea actually was appealing to her.", "1012" ], [ "That a girl I know randomly offer a threesome at dinner with me and my gf.\n\nA few weeks later we were all hanging out at her place, my gf was on the couch between us, and second girl and I started rubbing her legs, her back, etc.\n\nGirlfriend sighs, looks at both of us, and says \"I'm about to get jumped by both of you aren't I?\"\n\nAnd she did. And that night was great.\n\nThey year of fallout and toxic issues that stemmed from that encounter? Not so much.", "1012" ], [ "Yeah. Poly can kind of suck. \n\nI've been in ONE poly relationship for a matter of weeks, and on the one hand, it was one of the happiest times of my life. On the other had, it's SO freaking complicated.\n\nI've multiple times ended up in what most people would call 'emotional cheating' situations. But I CANNOT help it! I've always been a firm believer in you cannot change your feelings (about anything), only your reaction to them.\n\nIf you stub your toe on a sofa, no one would say that immediate 'oh FUCKBALLS' initial feeling was wrong. \n\nI feel the same way about developing crushes easily. I haven't physically cheated, and never would, but I can't help the feelings sometimes. Fortunately current gf understands my mindset but as I don't think I'm ever going to be able to have a multi person relationship again, I just wish those feelings wouldn't come up.", "813" ], [ "I'm seeing a lot of support here, and I am sorry for you. I am only coming at this to play devil's advocate, not defend him exactly.\n\n5 years is a long time. For anything. I haven't ever cheated, but I have been in situations where things have been held against me for years, and honestly, the other side, where I have held things against someone for years. It's frustrating.\n\nThe mindset is (and I will say this is assuming honesty on his part) \"I've told you everything. I've done everything I can to prove myself to you. WHY can't you just let it go?\"\n\nI'm not saying you can, or should. Just that's the other mindset. He's probably started to have thoughts of 'why am I trying if it's going to be this way in 5 more years? Or 10? Or 20?\"\n\nI'm ONLY saying this to give you info on where he may be coming from, if your intention is to continue to work towards the marriage.", "901" ], [ "Yeah. I was trying to describe to a friend who was curious (but not poly herself) about why they are so hard.\n\nTo me, it's simple basic math. In a 1 on 1 relationship, you have just that. ONE relationship.\n\nIn a 3 person poly (not even getting into more than that) you actually have FOUR relationships!\n\nPerson A and B. Person B and C. Person A and C. And then how all 3 of you connect.\n\nThat's 4 times the chances for hurt feelings, miscommunication, distrust, lack of being on the same page about things. Etc.", "813" ], [ "I don't have this from cheating (exactly, long story) but I do have it from a horrible traumatic event from 2010. \n\nI didn't understand PTSD before then. But today, everything is different. I can get distracted. I get moments of happiness. But then I just remember what happened and I get CRUSHED. I know I will never have the mindset I want, or the life I want, because of that one event. And yeah, life isn't horribly terrible but I didn't used to just lay in bed at nights, trying to shut the mind off, trying to not think about the events of that day.\n\nI can say for 100% sure, not one day has gone by in almost 9 years I don't think about the event for 1-2 hours a day.", "147" ], [ "I learned about death at age three when my grandfather died unexpectedly in his sleep one night in the house we were sharing with them at the time. \n\nDont recall word for word what was told to me but it is one of my earliest memories. Like most kids that age it's only flashes but I remember being in the house the morning of an lots of family activity and the fire dept coming.\n\nI remember my mom holding me over his open casket during the viewing. And I remember the funeral. (Oddly I remember that as part of the burial my cousin the same age and I were tasked with putting two scoops of dirt on the casket first. I remember us fighting over who got the red shovel and who got the blue one)\n\nI'm not sure I really understood 'death' but I did learn that at some point everyone's body just stops moving and they put you in the ground.", "630" ], [ "Probably a VERY lengthy incarnation. To prompt suicide by cop you pretty much have to commit multiple felonies.\n\nI cannot ever see a DA or judge letting someone off, even if you could prove it was a suicide attempt and someone had no intention of hurting the cops, because that would set a standard other people actually intent on cop killing could use.\n\nThe ONLY way I could see it happening where someone got off would be if they verbally resisted, did something like scream \"I've got a gun!\" And reach into their pocket where a cop might open fire before visualizing the weapon (and the person did NOT actually have one)\n\nEven then I'm pretty sure cops and lawyers are going to come up with some way to charge that person.", "141" ], [ "I watch a lot of shows with subtitles. It's not necessary but if it's a quiet movie or one with a lot of background noise I can get annoyed having to rewind and rewatch scenes.\n\nPlus I retain info better if I read than hear (this is pretty common) I find if i have subtitles on I remember character names. Otherwise sometimes I end a movie and couldnt tell you the character name of a single role.", "869" ], [ "It's kind of the \"McDonalds\" of comedy. It kinda gets the job done. It's easy and convenient (for example while there are long story arcs you can usually slap on any random episode and still follow it). It doesn't require absolute attention, it's good background filler.\n\nSo lovers tend to find it easy and comfortable, haters recognize it's really not comedy gold and the characters are all kinda crappy people for one reason or another", "367" ], [ "Sometimes it is purely psychological, and based on comparison. \n\nFor example say you get up at 6 and your spouse is still asleep. You wake up, get coffee, walk the dog, unload the dishwasher, respond to a few work emails, watch the news, get a two mile run in, start laundry. Then you're making breakfast when your spouse wakes up at 8am. \n\nNothing says you couldnt have done all those things after 8 (work/school schedule permitting) but you \"feel\" two hours ahead of your partner at this point. And this feeling tends to stick around even if they got the same amount done in their day, even if you go to bed two hours earlier.", "41" ], [ "Technically we were never really designed to wake up the way we do. If you are not waking up naturally you are being jolted out of deeper sleep by an alarm most days. The natural instinct when that happens is to want to return to sleep (unless assisted by adrenaline. For example you're wide away at 3am if you wake up to your smoke alarm going off)\n\nSecond the alarm out of reach suggestion. Gives your brain a few extra seconds to wake up.\n\nAlso, despite LOVING to sleep in a cold room and get all cozy under blankets, it makes it much harder to not crawl back under covers. Up the temp in your room.", "41" ], [ "Issue is while it may be illegal to fire you for this technically, if you live in an at will work area, they can fire you without cause.\n\nSo unless they are stupid enough to tell you on camera or in writing that you are fired for bringing up safety concerns, you will likely lose your job over this.\n\nA girl at a job I used to work at filed a sexual harassment claim because on of our cooks was bothering her (was making pretty offensive jokes, but harmless and not directed at her). Corporate investigated, cook was fired. A week later our manager fired the girl. Manager and I were close at work and be told me he fired her because he noticed that a lot of people were mad at her and people were now watching everything they said in what used to be a casual work environment. He didnt want other employees on edge or another employee to lose their job because this girl couldnt take a joke.", "402" ], [ "Ex EMT here.\n\nRan a psych call on this polite and well behaved 13 year old girl. Call itself went okay but was reading her chart.\n\nAbout 3 years prior her mom killed her dad. No good reason (as in he wasnt beating or harming his family) and mom got life in prison. So the kids (this one and her younger sister) ended up in foster care. \n\nFor two foster homes they managed to keep the sisters together. Then due to resources a few month prior to me meeting her, they were split up.\n\nAt the girls latest foster home she was raped by an older foster brother.\n\nAfter the rape she broke into an airport. She climbed up on a hanger roof and was attempting to jump off when the cops caught up to her and tazed her. \n\nWe were taking her to a long term psych facility. All she had were the clothes on her back and no family left except her sister who she didnt know where she was.\n\nI had a blanket with me (a personal one for long shifts on the box). I gave it to her just so she would have one more possession and hopefully remember some people do try to take care of others.", "851" ], [ "My girlfriend had a coworker she was working with. Said coworkers husband had just gotten a HUGE promotion and was transferred to Hawaii. <PERSON> was psyched! \n\nSo the couple and their two kids sold their house and were packing. \n\nThe day before their flight left (house in all but empty, only beds and a few things left) coworker comes home.\n\n<PERSON> had been lugging a suitcase up the stairs and tripped. Fell backwards and smashed his skull in at the bottom. She found him already dead.\n\nHe was 42 with no health problems. \n\nOnly silver lining is they were financially well off but their entire life was completely turned upside down by a staircase", "428" ], [ "I think the why is twofold.\n\nOne it would be a HUGE culture shock to any county not used to it. Youd have people arguing that the crime rate would skyrocket as people will have lost their fear of punishment, and honestly that might actually happen for awhile, as far as petty crimes go.\n\nTwo, how would that affect current prisoners. Say <PERSON> went to jail 8 years ago and still has another 8. But now his entire world is flipped upside down? Could we expect him to integrate well into this new system? Or would it just apply to all convictions after X date?", "279" ], [ "Well no one (or very few) people are picking up those coins and putting them back into circulation. \n\nA big issue is that a business GENERALLY gives out more coins than it receives. Most people paying cash will do so with bills..(Especially men as we dont have purses to carry little coin purses in) so they receive coin back more often.\n\nMany people do have coin jars at home but often dont redeem them for YEARS. And even then that money goes to banks or counting machines, not back into businesses, so the business needs to get them from banks.\n\nPlus also coins go missing, in houses, cars, streets", "170" ], [ "I absolutely think it would help recidivism. \n\nPeople who have never been in trouble with the law somehow wrap their minds around the \"fact\" that criminals are just criminals and will keep doing bad things.\n\nIn reality, MOST offenders, if you look at their records, will have started out very small. But every conviction, every gap in employment history, every time you are sealed away from how society works and have to learn to live by a completely different set of rules, makes it that much harder and finally impossible to function in a normal society anymore.", "178" ], [ "Again I have to disagree because our penalties are already really high.\n\nMost offenders of those things do get long sentences. Many are assaulted or killed by victims family members. In prison they are treated as the worst of the worst and attacked and raped frequently. After prison they are screwed. Hell I worked at a job where we hired a guy convicted of murder (though once we had the story it made a lot of sense) but still no one will hire a minor sex offender for anything.\n\nPoint is, I think if people already have THAT stacked against them a little more punishment wont be the deciding factor", "178" ], [ "It's all about when life begins.\n\nAt its CORE it actually has nothing to do with women's rights. If it did, we would allow women to yeet their one day old infant out the window when she realized she didnt actually want a baby. But of course no one allows that.\n\nSo just because the fetus is INSIDE the woman, does it have rights or not? \n\nThat is the basis for the argument.\n\nThere are some extremists that will argue that its \"sinful\" or \"abortion shouldn't be used as birth control\" but those are siddskirting the main contention.", "626" ], [ "Probably not. Just more people adding to the internet then 16 years ago.\n\nOne thing that HAS upticked though, at least in my experience, is people using mental illness and autism as excuses for bad or criminal behavior. As mental illness becomes more discussed and a topic out in the open, where before people wouldnt admit to a mental illness due to the stigma, people will now be like \"You cant get mad my 11 year old son grabbed your butt! Hes autistic!\" That HAS generated more frustration in some people", "652" ], [ "Race is kind of a societal man made construct.\n\nAt its core it's just skin color as far as biology is concerned. It's not body parts. \n\nThere is nothing wrong with embracing another culture you agree with more than the one you are raised in. \n\nYou can \"feel\" like a woman if you are born male.\n\nYou cant really \"feel\" like your skin is the wrong color (I mean you can, otherwise people wouldnt tan) but it has nothing to do with who you are inside", "818" ], [ "That's likely not true. In the US 34 states the age of consent is 16 and in 6 it is 17. Only a handful of states is it 18, and much of the world it is under 18 as well.\n\nPeople jump to the conclusion that 18 must be the age of consent because its tied to other events, like legally signing contracts, the age a parent can legally kick a child out, the ability to produce porn, and the age most crimes can be tried as an adult", "70" ], [ "No. Weight is just redistribution of resources already in the planet.\n\nPlanet only gains weight from extra terrestrial objects hitting it.\n\nIn fact, I would be curious if since matter can be converted to energy if the planet actually LOSES weight due to the fact energy is being used by living creatures and thus dissipating as heat.", "792" ], [ "It honestly depends.\n\nIf you're in good health and its within your healthy caloric intake for the day, a snickers isnt going to have any negative consequences (assuming we aren't doing this several times a day for a long period). For that person the candy bar will be better \n\nFor someone in good health but overweight then the cigarette will likely have less negative effects than the sugar from the candy bar. Not anything good, but less bad", "956" ], [ "Huh. Learned a new term today.\n\nBased on reading about what qualifies as a fantasy of manners I would say it fits about half of the characteristics. It is a pretty low magic setting, though there is some supernatural elements. Violence and character deaths are high. A lot of it is quite humorous but a lot of it is dry humor and a lot of the laughs come from character frustrations or well laid one liners, but its far from a comedy show.", "1010" ], [ "Most bacteria inside the human body are not harmful to it. Or rather no bacteria that is part of our body is harmful if it stays in the right place.\n\nIf displaced it can cause issues, but generally your immune system (and stomach if you are THAT into scat) can handle it.\n\nNow if someone has an intestinal infection or food poisoning or something and has...those activites.....there is cross contamination, no different than making out with someone with the flu", "642" ], [ "Am I understanding correctly in that you want an option for a pop up video for a sign language interpreter for a YouTube video?\n\nAs in an option for EVERY video?\n\nThere are millions of videos on youtube. That would never be feasible. \n\nAlso unlike movies YouTube uses voice recognition software for their closed captioning. I dont have hearing lose but like subtitles but youtube just cant quite accurate recognize every word and just takes their best (but often very incorrect) guess.\n\nAs for why CC often just says \"music\" instead of the lyrics it's because the music is supposed to be in the background while the dialog is what you are paying attention to.\n\nIf both were on screen at the same time it would take up a lot of screen space and also most people dont read that fast", "999" ], [ "From what I hear they actually treat their employees pretty well but any company that forces a script that hard core just grates on my nerves.\n\nI worked a job once that while we didnt have an 'official' end to conversation script, I got chewed out from my boss for saying \"Have a good one.\" They thought it sounded to casual and I should say \"Have a nice day.\" Instead. (<PERSON>)", "402" ] ]
259
[ 25333, 5038, 6685, 253, 20083, 22188, 20392, 868, 1765, 19027, 20423, 19759, 1055, 19452, 7075, 9682, 679, 19313, 10667, 3958, 3356, 19679, 10627, 20251, 19125, 13945, 18003, 11791, 20224, 12607, 12143, 16292, 20070, 5040, 14011, 22024, 12843, 1763, 22804, 11819, 6529, 372, 18012, 22134, 14494, 944, 4898, 2216, 1845, 11758, 13562, 4996, 20860, 19084, 13365, 21027, 5336, 14526, 10176, 5387, 1864, 5370, 9915, 9539, 23530, 3695, 9968, 12027, 3209, 11195, 24162, 10636, 13917, 9227, 7492, 18971, 17399, 16119, 10020, 2573, 21263, 10845, 23955, 16924, 3779, 6285, 18631, 7688, 18780, 1941, 9775, 14047, 20927, 20024, 23374, 145, 10550, 7593, 2362, 8206, 10198, 1425, 19234, 18964, 3524, 4656, 6005, 2642, 9635, 15531, 21424, 8420, 10738, 14674, 8914, 2363, 9248, 14777, 23107, 24471, 20106, 8067, 3347, 7057, 18594, 4733, 10079, 20018, 3288, 23180, 19492, 9677, 6669, 19192, 20291, 3097, 6894, 7659, 16101, 12426, 22740, 7752, 20363, 9210, 5876, 876, 12922, 20644, 9381, 12594, 14446, 13835, 4129, 18222, 4718, 2046, 24132, 5723, 11225, 22496, 11526, 23458, 10476, 4872, 7674, 11248, 7107, 12258, 21485, 3450, 21058, 10614, 14178, 17726, 7530, 1915, 15296, 15082, 24682, 25362, 20499, 14633, 23063, 24261, 20336, 16309, 9127, 3442, 21843, 8648, 8063, 21143, 14436, 8790, 19756, 22254, 15813, 19152, 9110, 8375, 14939, 23799, 13987, 1593, 5697, 18717, 14217, 19404, 18385, 13246, 4526, 11188, 18102, 18090, 19908, 17005, 2956, 7617, 17373, 410, 4273, 2129, 11059, 11942, 7465, 21036, 744, 6993, 22627, 797, 6788, 10462, 11435, 20205, 6012, 12470, 1339, 8454, 7050, 12500, 5948, 9672, 24946, 13778, 11119, 18630, 13086, 4897, 6123, 18436, 9509, 23637, 23187, 18435, 23901, 11183, 397, 2131, 1198, 3011, 7515, 8607, 10523, 13627, 17049, 16882, 13477, 14228, 462, 7710, 10075, 5831, 17180, 16099, 6937, 9103, 25394, 11467, 21152, 12670, 15183, 25265, 24295, 14660, 5070, 24388, 15429, 16545, 24217, 17476, 135, 4346, 1126, 12129, 23872, 3412, 4293, 7985, 8502, 23759, 16078, 20127, 10148, 23251, 3389, 8216, 17762, 9448, 14053, 9368, 18002, 17592, 4321, 1467, 2441, 3824, 8135, 17365, 14799, 8619, 15246, 9083, 25475, 21271, 13043, 1574, 5584, 8884, 13240, 392, 24188, 15395, 15470, 13435, 2, 3857, 15624, 8475, 11186, 4438, 508, 1653, 11604, 20001, 10144, 13628, 13824, 14164, 10890, 13142, 14969, 7389, 19359, 19849, 23313, 5859, 8908, 24377, 22183, 2992, 6134, 5537, 974, 23199, 24814, 11600, 8511, 14947, 8279, 7280, 7962, 394, 12090, 14188, 17595, 15826, 5953, 10712, 3633, 2837, 9151, 14518, 2404, 24401, 21778, 20330, 11619, 3758, 10932, 5960, 10304, 7269, 4711, 17986, 9041, 7257, 838, 10702, 14671, 73, 2570, 9599, 7073, 10873, 9543, 8928, 23685, 19910, 6232, 8059, 11884, 8151, 20596, 587, 9042, 4932, 5300, 9244, 12271, 1463, 21066, 21004, 25066, 1207, 12949, 2272, 10110, 7676, 15504, 21096, 20794, 1185, 77, 19743, 13668, 15573, 14545, 6153, 24435, 17253, 4971, 8224, 6635, 2622, 11939, 5637, 12364, 24788, 13385, 23271, 15034, 14162, 8165, 7571, 10707, 4157, 17543, 18498, 24313, 3054, 17193, 8557, 11983, 20617, 18092, 9754, 5548, 9394, 20653, 1017, 19815, 4177, 1786, 12692, 16710, 2916, 6513, 20371, 12418, 3866, 25341, 22824, 1981, 7282, 19169, 16727, 25507, 10785, 7048, 6095, 9833, 10085, 1401, 3577, 6371, 10507, 1754, 12846, 9253 ]
reddit_dump_07TacOcaT70
[ [ "See, as a female, if I were to go on a date I personally wouldn’t mind occasionally putting on some makeup or a dress (although I’m working on getting my weight down before I start wearing skirts again but I would wear nicer smarter trousers or a blouse instead of a T-shirt) I feel like throwing in a blouse instead of a t shirt isn’t a difficult feat - but I also don’t feel like the gf is in the wrong here because she probably just feels that it’s not necessary to dress up for dates anymore. However pruning on smarter trousers and a blouse takes just as long as jeans and a t shirt so I feel like she could do that much occasionally. However makeup is annoying and I cba with it always so I get where she’s coming from there lol", "179" ], [ "Probably neater trousers and a shirt. However females can wear neater trousers and a blouse to dress up a bit so I mean he shouldn’t have a problem with her wearing something like that if what I’m guessing he wore is what he wore.\n\nEdit: a word. Smh it would’ve completely made my post make no sense lol.", "179" ], [ "NTA oh my god I see so many stories similar with twins. The parents should NEVER blatantly have a favourite child! It’s kinda disgusting and so horrible to the non favourite I mean you’re in the army ffs and they’re telling you to man up and being like “you’re not all that much of a *real* soldier” like wtf no dude that’s horrible. Ignore them, they need to really evaluate their actions before they see you again. Maybe don’t cut them off completely but stay away for a while it’ll probably do you a lot of good. Hope they see the faults in their actions soon. I’m so sorry you had to deal with that.", "405" ], [ "Dude the army treats people harshly to toughen them up and prepare them for some of the horrors, you should know that having worked in the army and being a vet, but your family isn’t there to make you get tougher they’re meant to have a far more caring attitude towards each other and even if small fights or nasty things are said they should ultimately realise their wrongs and apologise and make up. They shouldn’t constantly degrade and destroy someone’s self esteem their whole life. There’s tough love and treating someone like they’re not good enough/wanted. Family’s should **not** be the latter.\n\nEdit: a word", "920" ], [ "Maybe don’t cut contact forever but stage something like what op did and leave showing you have no intent to come back unless they can find ways to make amends. Maybe try and get them to see how hurtful they’ve been instead of completely just cutting them off. It might work out but until you can get out of there I wish you the best.", "206" ], [ "<PERSON>\n\n\nThey’re obviously trying to be like ‘haha ur probably gay, betcha feel gay, stupid, you’re not all that straight since I wasn’t a Male’\nThen you were like ‘ok but no lol since u were Male’\nThen they got sad. They’re just a dumbass and what the tried to pull completely bit them back in their own arse. Honestly they’re just stupid and got what was coming lol.", "339" ], [ "I mean most trans people say ‘ I kinda always knew/was different (aka more like the gender they weren’t born as)’ so yeah but a lot also say they didn’t understand what the feelings meant until they were older (whereas some do kinda always know) so yeah I think most trans people agree with that statement... they kinda were always meant to be the other gender just don’t always know until one day it strikes.\n\nHowever yeh some people might think differently.", "390" ], [ "Yeah no that’s bullshit they were obviously trying to do a ‘gotcha’ kinda thing and it backfired. They weren’t a female at the time, at least not physically and since they didn’t know what they were dealing with at the time thus not even thinking about transitioning yet, they were not female at the time. Just like they weren’t female when they were born. They were mentally, but physically no, and they didn’t know until far later from my perspective. They 100% the asshole and need to F off with that womanhood thing. If I say I’m a female then I’m a female and that’s all the female-ness I need to have. I don’t need to be into a single girly thing. Nothing is black and white and no female will love all girly things wether they’re born female or not. Hate when people do stuff like say “man up” instead of being supportive to men it’s just so rude and doesn’t help anyone.", "181" ], [ "“OmG thAt WaS SO HarD tO UndErStaNd! WhAT ClAn aRe TheY fRoM?”\n\n<PERSON> and when they come over to Scotland and Ireland looking for their clans and fucking get pissed when the pubs aren’t ‘Scottish/Irish enough’ lmfaoooo I both laugh so hard but also just facepalm", "5" ], [ "It really can’t. I can understand people who use Aussie slang and I’m not Australian, all of you act like we’re talking in Gaelic when it’s Doric and even then sometimes it’s not even Doric it’s just spelling things funny lmfao. Your only excuse is if the post uses heavy amounts of Gaelic since Gaelic is actually a different language.", "625" ], [ "I think the only one I really, *really* can’t stand is the “””step”””brother shit because like ew. A lot of the time it might as well be incest and I just can’t fuck with that it’s too distracting and grossed me out (like incest shit used to make me throw up in my mouth a bit sometimes bc wtf is that??! Why do they’ve have to be at all related?!)\n\nWell anyways I agree with the gross toxic shit being fun to read but never actually wanting that irl for myself", "244" ], [ "Firstly, why are you looking for something you’ll disagree with? What?\n\nSecondly, I didn’t say they/others can’t like or shouldn’t like incest(in fiction), just that I personally don’t like it.\n\nIsn’t it hypocritical to shit on me for sharing my opinion of what I like and dislike, while condemning me when I wasn’t actually doing what you thought I was? \n\nI also closed it off by saying I agree, it’s harmless to read it (which means that in reality, it doesn’t matter since it’s fiction) and as long as people don’t want that irl then it’s healthy.\n\nI think in future you should double check before you comment this stuff because you’re definitely just looking for an argument but you didn’t actually understand what I said.", "837" ], [ "Again that’s still not the same as “but you also can’t like this thing because I dislike it”\n\nJust as I’m allowed to say “I don’t like x” you can say you dislike the things I like which are trashy. I also didn’t say “idk how anyone can like it” I just said “I don’t like it”\n\nThis is literally just you continually misconstruing what I said and putting words in my mouth. You’re the one who’s acting simple since you can’t actually understand what I said. If you like incest, that’s up to you, and just because I hate it doesn’t mean that you’re suddenly not allowed to read it.\n\nMaybe don’t go looking for fights and being so hostile in the future. Especially if you’re not actually going to be able to present your opinion without giving up, it makes no sense. (Again I can’t understand why you would specifically be going to try and find something you disagree with, that doesn’t seem healthy).", "730" ], [ "I’ve seen someone do the same transition, but op at least isn’t using the same image as them, as the person I saw do this prior had at least one more block in there - gravel. They might’ve also had one more of the mossy/green transition blocks but I can’t remember it super clearly.\n\nAnyways yeah it’s been done before but I think op did at least make this specific image", "484" ], [ "Isn’t that the same in (SPOILER) > !the “who made me a princess” manhwa?! < where she was originally from the “otome game (or was it a book? Can’t remember.)” world, then went to “our world: Korea” then back to the fantasy world?\n\nEdit: oh an also > !the doctor girl one, <PERSON> the surgeon with the lamp, something like that?! < because I really like those two, so if it’s the same concept I’ll def check this out", "547" ], [ "Also since when were skinny jeans “out”?\n\nSkinny jeans will forever look better than bootcut and *especially* bell bottoms imo (and I’m overweight. I just hate how stumpy and extra fat wide cut jeans make me look. I look so much better in skinny cut jeans (although the super skinny ones obviously are too thin for me))\n\nAlthough obviously everyone has their own preferences, styles, and some people look great in non skinny jeans, it’s super rude to comment on something like that (seemingly) unprompted imo\n\nPoint is whatever they like and suits them is the best choice. I look bad in turtle necks so even if they’re “in” I won’t wear them because why would I do that to myself? Simple as that. Wear what suits you", "179" ], [ "I’m sure they’ll last! I can’t think of a time skinny jeans have been unacceptable to wear.\n\nI mean sure boot cut or flared jeans might become the more popular choice, but I feel like there’s never been a time I’ve not been able to go to the shops when I’ve needed trousers and find some skinnier cut jeans.", "433" ], [ "Probably one of those people who claim to be from a country but really they mean their great great <PERSON>’s dog was from there smh my head. 😕😕\n\nThere’s literally no other explanation as poopenfarten is real and the real German word and I would know because my Mum’s friend’s dog sitter is German and they said so them self. Fake Germans is a plague of this century 😔😭\n\nLiterally can’t believe there are still poopenfarten deniers in the 21st century", "157" ], [ "Ok but the person who said “Americans: If you come to America you gotta speak English. Also Americans: HAHA LET’S TALK SHIT ABOUT OTHER LANGUAGES” absolutely *enrages* me bc their logic is shit. Like yeah, if someone said “you must speak English” then surely that means that they think English is superior, so then it wouldn’t be a shock of they then made fun of other languages.\n\nAlso they’re not even making fun of other languages. Also also, who says any of them are American? Idk that comment just really bugs me cause there’s so many flaws in it (and I don’t even care about the stereotype of Americans being like “must speak English” since I’m not American and idk if they actually do that? Maybe? Not the point!)", "930" ], [ "Nah the the bus driver was covered in his own blood.\n\nWhat happened was the scooter guy was riding in the bus lane (sometimes cyclists do it too but a scooter doing that’s just as bad) and then the scooter guy in the green t shirt punched the bus driver in the face for “driving too close to him” when he was a bus driver... in a BUS lane. \n\nSo the bus driver tries to get the guy to stay so he can get a picture of him so he can file a police report I assume and then the guy doesn’t want his photo taken so he runs off onto a road then gets hit.", "449" ], [ "Ok so just to be clear the reason it’s a facepalm is that buzzfeed posted that article on April first so the article is a troll it’s intentionally dumb.\n\nSo then someone posted it to a subreddit that’s about disliking buzzfeed, their post got over 1 thousand upvotes *but* the buzzfeed article was *meant* to be stupid. So the one thousand people who upvoted the post fell for buzzfeed’s article since it was a joke.\n\n\n(Sorry If this comes off as condescending since I spelled it all out I just wanted to make sure that I was being clear)", "272" ], [ "I get where you’re coming from but maybe you could just explain to a guidance counsellor or idk but I’ve heard before that there’s someone who kinda knows about the students with special requirements and you could maybe mention that due to your disability you struggle with accents and request that you can get professors without accents. I get where you’re coming from because at the end of the day you’re not discriminating against them in a negative way just trying to make sure you can actually pass your classes.\n\nBtw I’m half African and I’ve not even once met someone who could just read my last name without mispronouncing it. However it is 11 letters long and super hard to figure out if you don’t speak a very specific language. My first name is also foreign, <PERSON>. I have no accent though, and I have a best friend who’s got two foreign parents and who was technically born in a different country but has no accent so do keep in mind it might just be better to specifically request professors with no accents and make it clear it’s because you genuinely can’t understand them. I don’t think you’re an ass because it’s not your fault and you’re just trying to get someone you can understand.", "948" ], [ "<PERSON>\n\n\nHe’s the dude that’s been fucking up all the public toilets lol.\n\nSeriously though how is it hard that if you drop toilet paper you pick it up, you don’t have to use it, but you just put it in the toilet and it gets flushed away?\n\nOr if you get something on the seat, you just gotta take some tp, and wipe around the seat after wetting it with some water.\n\nHe’s a fully grown adult, not a toddler, he needs to act like it.", "670" ], [ "Yeah and I don’t feel like you can really get offended at a lot of the posts since people come here to share their personal experiences and opinions of/from so many different subreddits that it’s hard for people to pander to the sub as a whole since a lot of people with different interests might be here.", "837" ], [ "No. They were not. They were darker skinned. Darker skinned does not equal black.\n\nAmazigh people can be very fair skinned naturally and have blue or green eyes which has been happening for over 400 years since European women were taken as slaves back to North Africa. However Amazigh people were also naturally not always very dark, but could be just brown or very tanned looking. Amazigh people can dark enough to be considered black, but a lot of them are paler (kind of like Middle Easterns, you can tell they’re not just a white person with a tan, but they can be light enough to have the same shade as a white person with a dark tan).\n\nAsian people were also never black. They were very dark skinned but the rick naturally became lighter skinned and that’s why a lot of Asian people even today strive to be pale skinned. The rich never had to work on the farm as the poor did so they became noticeably pale and then the poor wanted to look like that and that’s how it started (this was a long time ago). Now most Asian people don’t want to be pale to look rich it’s just became a part of their culture.\n\n\nAlso Amazigh is the term for Berber that most Amazigh people prefer... Berber was the name the Romans gave them just in case you didn’t know and were thinking “why are you going on about them?” \n\nAlso also I’m Moroccan so that’s why I know about this and I’m learning mandarin so I’ve studied up on Asian culture (but specifically Chinese) because I like to learn background when I learn a language since I think it’s interesting to know the background and sometimes it can even aid in you learning the language.", "818" ], [ "Please, for your own sake, seek help! There are a lot of sources and plenty of people who would love to hear about your feelings and help get you through your struggles.\n\n\nI can guarantee there are people in your life who love and care about you, even if you feel like they don’t. Like the post said, they’d rather hear your struggles than about your death or even attempted death.", "168" ], [ "I see what you mean. I think a lot of guys do look after themselves in some ways (shaving for example) but then maybe don’t cut their nails often etc. plus, some guys thing it’s “prissy” or whatever. However a lot of men will at least make themselves look presentable.\n\nStill though, wether a dude books his appointment or not as long as he *is* getting his hair done I don’t see much difference.", "90" ], [ "Yeah, I don’t think it’s prissy either and actually I think it’s important for people to teach guys to treat themselves with respect! Just some men seem to be very selective with their grooming.\n\nAlso usually the guys who put down their gfs really are slobs in their appearance! Ironic as hell.\n\nAnd yeah sometimes I cba shaving but then I always wear long sleeves or a jacket and full length trousers so it doesn’t really make a difference lol but I care so it does to myself.", "90" ], [ "Yeah if someone can’t afford to buy tons of books then they should at least be able to access them through a library! Jesus so what if they lose some sales? The people who get books from libraries might not be able to afford always spending money on books. Even if they *are* being truthful in that their sales went up, I bet if this policy continued and people were fully aware their profits would go back to how they were originally after a period.", "215" ], [ "Yeah anything fits here really. You had something bugging you and you posted it to get it off your chest! What you did was literally the whole point of this subreddit so don’t worry!\n\n\nAlso yeah I agree I think people should feign ignorance unless they’re specifically told in situations like that. It’s annoying and it feels invasive.\n\n\n\nEdit: well not “anything” but if something’s bugging someone then it fits here as far as I’m aware. As long as they don’t break the subreddit’s rules.", "837" ], [ "See they’re obviously more qualified than me, but I think “relatively normal” doesn’t necessarily mean “healthy”...\n\nI mean I can get that kinda response given the stress you’d face, but I would’ve thought they’d council you on ways to cope with and release that stress or built up emotions... that or they took “wanting to kill” not at face value which they probably shouldn’t be doing either", "52" ], [ "You’d be surprised. If you mention anything that someone evil/nasty did correct or well, people have a tendency to make extreme mental leaps and want to bicker for the point of bickering. \n\nIt’s annoying so I just wanted to clarify and not deal with some prick being like “omg how could you even say that!? You think the Nazis did a certain task well?!? OMG YOU JUST SAID YOU SUPPORT NAZIS?!?!? YOU SUPPORT GENOCIDE?!!?!?!?” I can almost hear the cogs turning in their head lmao", "743" ], [ "I like all but the anti-freeze bc her gender shouldn’t matter. If it were only female characters being used for that, it’d be extra bad, but I think that should be changed to “no person” since it’s generally a tactic which I think often indicates bad writing, no matter the gender of the victimised character, or the gender of the perp.\n\nUnless they worded it that way since it’s centred around women, but even then you can have some general rules for people sprinkled in imo.\n\nOverall I like these tests and they’re very good to check against a film. It’s strange that otome isekai which is often written by and for women don’t pass even half of these tests :(", "1010" ], [ "As a woman who prefers neutrals or grey/black and white, I envy men’s clothing.\n\nNo frills, no floral, no stupid lace, no random pleats, extra upper arm room, less super thin or curved edges. More subtle details. Less ridiculous buttons where they don’t need to be, etc.\n\nOnly downside is no nipped in waste or extra room for breasts. Basically the shape of the garments can be overly boxy so too baggy at the waist, too narrow at the hips and too narrow at the chest/bust but perfect apart from that", "179" ], [ "My point is that it actually is an issue for men and it stuck out to me as one which has nuances which applies to men, whereas many of the others are more issues with female characters hence why you have a bechdel test but there’s no male equivalent. It’s similar to a rule about having people of colour I’ve seen before, but there’s not a white equivalent.\n\nFor example with male characters I’ve seen gay male characters be used to make a homophobic character have “personal growth” (not be homophobic human trash) and usually when they hit a gay person, then have some internal dilemma or guilt or something about it, it’s a gay man who’s hit and is used as a device to make them grow and not a lesbian woman. That’s one example I’ve seen far too many times.", "256" ], [ "Exactly. It’s like they can’t comprehend that one of the scary things about people like Nazis who managed to commit so many atrocities is the fact that they were clever enough or good enough in some ways to gain the power to commit those vile acts. Yet somehow not smart enough to see how awful what they did was. Pointing that out doesn’t = supporting them in any way! If anything it’s a criticism in some ways.", "743" ], [ "I get it to an extent - as I mentioned men and women tend to have different body shapes so it’s better to have different shapes of clothes.\n\nApart from that though, it just annoys me. Plenty of men like wearing bright colours or even stuff like floral and look great in it! Plenty of women love darker, bolder colours and don’t suit frills and pale or bright colours (or suit it but don’t like it). There’s definitely a market for it, why not cater to that market?", "179" ], [ "Yeah but it’d probably be too hard to enforce, and the lazy pieces of shit who do this probably still wouldn’t care, as they definitely wouldn’t be the people who’d clean it, it’d probably be some nice person who wants to help or wants the path opened.\n\nIn a perfect world they could be caught on film doing it and held responsible directly, but that’s even more difficult to enforce!", "695" ], [ "You hit the nail on the head, if they were so incompetent it really does make their victims out to be idiots or incapable, which obviously is blatantly untrue. It can also discredit any resistance groups like “well if they were good enough they could’ve been more successful” ignoring how difficult that would be to try and fight, and making them seem less brave and more plain reckless or stupid. Definitely helps to fully understand how power can be abused in underhanded and manipulative ways and how that can snowball if left unchecked.", "305" ], [ "Well in that case, shouldn’t a spot be recognising as he’s stepping back that:\n\nHis form’s way off\n\nHe stepped too far back (which I think the spot told him to do?) from the safety rails\n\nHe’s shaking a bit and obviously already struggling to lift that weight.\n\nHence the spotter technically shouldn’t even need to support him in this case since he never should’ve been trying something this heavy", "525" ], [ "Well that was a bit of a mental leap there.\n\nMany of the people there I don’t personally like to watch, but there are a few people who are pretty interesting to watch. I’m not a fan or <PERSON> or <PERSON> though, which is kinda annoying since they frequently show up in other people’s streams.\n\nI’ll watch the occasional <PERSON> and <PERSON> though, they’re good imo (also <PERSON> and a few other people but they’re far more occasional). However you’d have to pay me to actively get involved in the fandoms lol", "919" ], [ "He also does this knowing he has a young and impressionable audience who act fucking crazy, harassing people who even say “I’m personally not a fan” without actually saying anything bad about him, nevermind when someone actually criticises him. They’ll believe what he says especially if he has “scientific/mathematical evidence/proof”\n\nI genuinely believe he was never trying to convince outsiders that he wasn’t guilty, he was just trying to do damage control on his crazed stans and protect his image in their eyes. \n\nHe also actively encourages the crazy stans, which has allowed a whole community of them to make porn of people like <PERSON> or <PERSON> who were underage (plus they’ve specifically said they’re disgusted by it or don’t like it, which should be enough for people to stop, regardless of their age). And allows his stans to feel vindicated and like they’re supported when attacking people. \n\nIdk, he’s human, he’s not completely a pos and has handled some situations ok, but he’s also done some very shady and disingenuous stuff so I can’t support that personally.", "936" ], [ "Damn ikr, especially after he deleted like 200 of his older videos.\n\nHis old style of humour has been fading recently (since mid 2020 I’d say) and just slowly seems to be more kid friendly based stuff? Idk if that sounds completely ridiculous considering the blood for the blood god stuff, but it feels less mature and more persona ish than in the past. I guess that makes sense since it’s an roleplaying smp, but I still miss some of his older more sarcastic humour and some of the times he would go on tangents about stuff in his life or stuff he’s learned about, they were interesting. Or even videos like doing impressive stuff (potato wars, hypixel championships, hunger games, sky wars, bed wars, etc.)\n\nOr hell, even when he played mc story mode and just mocked the shit out of it lol", "936" ], [ "Both basically hamper your learning (E: or ability to do standard education. Without extra support it’d be pretty impossible to get your full potential out of school) ability greatly.\n\nDyslexia - pretty obvious since it’s partly being unable to read easily, however there are other symptoms like short attention span, difficulty expressing yourself, disorganisation, poor memory.\n\nADHD - basically you have to spend hours more than peers to complete some of the same tasks, this effects your social and private life too since you spend a lot more time on homework. Lacking attention span, and finding it hard to store and follow through on multiple instructions at the same time like if the teacher says “read pages 1-4, then do questions s-y on page 5 of your work book, finally go to the Google classroom and complete the task we started yesterday” someone with ADHD can have issues with doing all of that without a list to help remind them the order and what to do. For example one of my friend’s teacher never put the homework on Google classroom with a reminder, so he could sometimes forget about homework or complete it incorrectly so he has issues there. I wasn’t in his class so I couldn’t help out sadly, and the teacher wasn’t being supportive.", "91" ], [ "Yeah he deleted 200+ vids. The background that triggered it is he made a tweet back in 2014 or 16, where he said “I didn’t know <PERSON> was a lesbian” (CONTEXT: there was a paper at the time of his tweet that discovered under Nazis, for some reason lesbians weren’t persecuted nearly as much as other minorities, to at all, hence the joke that <PERSON> was a lesbian) and some weird Kpop stan on Twitter who’d obviously been digging through his old tweets to bring up issues, decided to critique him on it and try to get him cancelled.\n\nIt didn’t really catch on, but regardless he deleted a lot of the old stuff since he used to make some edgier jokes.\n\n(The irony is that Techno has said he’d “die for lesbians” and openly supported lesbians specifically before)", "337" ], [ "It’ll be interesting in 20+ years time when people around my age are looking back on their youth. I wonder how many of them will regret spending such a significant part of it obsessing over every move of some strangers online, and having that become their personality. Whether it’s Kpop or minecraft stans. \n\nI’m genuinely curious if it’ll be viewed sort of like trekkies or extreme fans of other media, or if it’ll be viewed differently. Maybe it’ll be viewed like celebrity worship (like a lot of singers have, the 1D fandom seemed to act similarly to this fandom, well from an outsider’s perspective anyways lol)?", "336" ], [ "When youre one of the people who’s been enjoying the irony, and slowly you start thinking “wait. That doesn’t seem ironic... maybe I’m just missing the tone, it’s purely through text, after all” then proceeds to notice more and more dubiously ironic content, having more and more moments like “wait, that *is* ironic, right? Well the replies at least look like they are... so probably. Wait, but actually these 2 replies don’t seem so ironic... oh shit” and then you realise the unironic people have started going in there and have to jump ship real quick ‘cause you don’t want any part of that lol", "339" ], [ "I’m guessing there’s more context and they don’t want to escalate it? I mean no one seemed all that shocked, even the girl being assaulted, which struck me as pretty odd. Idk, seemed like a very weird situation overall, so I’m wondering if they’ve fought before or something.\n\nDoesn’t mean the friends shouldn’t still at least separate them, more just trying to figure out why there was an overall non reaction from them", "186" ], [ "He went through a tough time, I can’t remember what it was. Went on a religious journey bc of that, and went through a period where he legit would preach about Christianity. Creeped me the fuck out bc I’d not been on his channel in 4 years at that point and it was like he was a different person 😕\n\nE: oh yeah, and he started trend chasing. Abandoned mc when it fell in popularity (before he’d switched to a more kid friendly persona though) then hopped on fortnite *hard* then rejoined mc when it got big again. Plays among us too now. Basically went for a you kid audience based channel.", "936" ], [ "I wouldn’t, I don’t want them to get hurt. I’d much prefer their instinct is to deescalate the situation so that I don’t get hurt, they don’t get hurt, and they don’t get into any issues for defending me.\n\nOf course, if they started getting hit, I’d be fine with self defence!", "955" ], [ "Oh nah I was genuinely asking, it’s more that I know people can be prescribed drugs with dangerous side effects, stuff like morphine or ketamine can be used for example despite both being pretty addictive, but I was just thinking with antidepressants in particular, there’s a really wide range of them that don’t have as serious side effects, so I found it weird that they’d do that.\n\n(looking back, I think I interpreted it as that being the first antidepressant they tried with him, which may or may not be true, but with anti depressants it can take some trial and error to find the right ones which work on an individual basis. Generally in personal experience, if an anti depressant doesn’t show signs of working, or especially if it’s showing some of the more extreme side effects (for most drugs) they’ll try to get you onto an alternative ASAP)", "398" ], [ "Yeah that’s what I’m wondering, just from personal experience, even if it’s working, if you start showing some of the bad side effects then they usually take you off pretty quickly and start trying to find a new one that’ll work for you. Feels bad he went through losing his wife that way, then dealt with poor drug comparability on top of it", "398" ] ]
359
[ 14511, 6858, 8244, 11973, 7624, 15660, 19346, 20337, 6360, 20166, 202, 782, 21914, 22790, 9859, 22287, 13912, 23327, 10747, 23212, 7235, 7324, 3596, 15338, 24259, 10249, 12007, 2658, 21546, 12340, 1042, 15713, 11193, 10464, 7504, 11339, 1264, 2473, 16553, 18801, 21498, 21691, 11474, 10993, 20142, 15727, 13104, 10331, 7431, 18065, 25060, 1282, 24175, 23421, 7174, 23048, 6217, 9465, 8051, 2060, 16521, 18727, 17255, 16542, 2996, 21872, 8354, 538, 9535, 1160, 21586, 8496, 10680, 17817, 10246, 1715, 20010, 2239, 3620, 9087, 16107, 2525, 15718, 18570, 11206, 518, 20734, 14917, 24612, 14559, 8060, 20952, 10882, 6883, 2461, 23696, 23801, 18810, 2306, 2126, 21236, 15281, 22980, 23032, 1527, 10024, 18267, 4914, 4855, 6799, 1439, 6759, 13827, 21398, 8203, 14818, 24428, 13040, 19962, 19556, 11931, 22432, 4482, 10687, 6772, 11051, 22065, 7194, 17644, 2311, 3212, 12840, 4706, 5374, 21154, 12154, 8320, 24841, 7788, 18597, 24204, 19201, 13072, 11015, 606, 21827, 1511, 3423, 17660, 1849, 1925, 3222, 15245, 14114, 14696, 17607, 24584, 16042, 21845, 12035, 20895, 1082, 24055, 1214, 17880, 13069, 12656, 6552, 14272, 5139, 18205, 1744, 10105, 19344, 21049, 14588, 15120, 16265, 3038, 3826, 22233, 14416, 23397, 24042, 12197, 10939, 8101, 5153, 4987, 12689, 12900, 16973, 19333, 18827, 5340, 22593, 11604, 19183, 16646, 25450, 8621, 4533, 11514, 10052, 20264, 3383, 9145, 12397, 5690, 13350, 18162, 1009, 320, 6657, 18853, 7716, 2720, 4275, 10332, 18702, 23382, 20176, 23067, 19447, 7078, 3847, 25512, 11783, 461, 9294, 17485, 24510, 11181, 21902, 4899, 19709, 5189, 13478, 11421, 6269, 4575, 5227, 6675, 6603, 7907, 6054, 13325, 24761, 18170, 22132, 13384, 1139, 2673, 1716, 3685, 13262, 21702, 2432, 14324, 4522, 17804, 8412, 12874, 13015, 8910, 2852, 9275, 12330, 11168, 7372, 2124, 18116, 24079, 18856, 25395, 24585, 12103, 12980, 23630, 21669, 11408, 9696, 18870, 14215, 17887, 24463, 10928, 11240, 18324, 17824, 14321, 11812, 22852, 25355, 18626, 23464, 24687, 14293, 23554, 23493, 6014, 12127, 15271, 1120, 1725, 19115, 11428, 20135, 14240, 4075, 465, 19049, 25227, 5696, 8089, 5215, 8521, 13178, 2429, 6637, 12826, 261, 20725, 15089, 25076, 7597, 22209, 18342, 23428, 14857, 6785, 16903, 13702, 4613, 20965, 23713, 1194, 4071, 14706, 3503, 14103, 14117, 18350, 8301, 12426, 14640, 7463, 2764, 11833, 10999, 6618, 16691, 2264, 19238, 18416, 13522, 23370, 7980, 3370, 23200, 6737, 13479, 24004, 24767, 24739, 13815, 10174, 3147, 17058, 8330, 6238, 12905, 1179, 17589, 2873, 19465, 6862, 12407, 24545, 21928, 17500, 16686, 25065, 21905, 8338, 11549, 1005, 17543, 17324, 11881, 21129, 12512, 21560, 1230, 12566, 14162, 6946, 9972, 23209, 11305, 15048, 2804, 25168, 12483, 23871, 4594, 19020, 11830, 8515, 14552, 8872, 15852, 7414, 7582, 5801, 11929, 19867, 8689, 22662, 18100, 2173, 2599, 12441, 11042, 21373, 9411, 1242, 19446, 13737, 1040, 18054, 22727, 7479, 2350, 1598, 6394, 21510, 8531, 1030, 12859, 3505, 15451, 10037, 12459, 11010, 11453, 6782, 96, 3031, 15989, 13048, 18363, 14469, 1717, 3627, 1638, 20430, 165, 3728, 14564, 13939, 13132, 25503, 12606, 20064, 809, 23789, 14995, 16476, 15846, 9052, 6682, 16594, 632, 23567, 5768, 4516, 21789, 8148, 12202, 8898, 6976, 674, 8028, 9738, 8310, 5041, 8747, 18664, 2942, 3981, 3504, 6760, 4829, 14189, 20485, 20310, 24820, 14916 ]
reddit_dump_07mk
[ [ "> Sure, they are doing one-sided data collection. That is a problem (that I'd love to think a solution to). \n\nI'm not sure how this is one-sided data collection. This is just collecting data on what they want to measure: incidents of silencing or shaming or the like in response to good faith. What's the \"other side\" of that one side supposed to be, all the incidents when people just have regular productive conversations? The point is that that's supposed to be the default, and the opposite is supposed to not happen.\n\nIt's not one-sided to collect incidents of sexual harassment when trying to get a sense of if sexual harassment is a major problem in whatever environment you're concerned about. \n\nNow, I could see a stronger argument one could make, that, if one wants to determine if there's a sexual harassment crisis, one should also get a count of all non-sexual-harassment incidents, so that we can get both the denominator and the numerator and thus get a true rate of the bad incidents, rather than just taking a raw count of all incidents, which lacks context. For instance, using some made-up fantasy numbers, if there are 1,000 sexual harassment incidents in a month, that might sound really large and scary, but if the context is among 7 billion people making quadrillions of non-sexual-harassment interactions with each other in the same time frame, then it's hardly anything to be concerned about.\n\nWhich is a fair point; this collection wouldn't give us a great sense of how many non-silencing/shaming/whatever in response to good faith incidents happen, and it's not clear how we would measure that.\n\nBut then we can get into the context of the academy, which is an institution that's specifically designed for not having silencing/shaming/whatever in response to good faith, and thus any count that's not infinitesimally close to zero is highly troubling. Furthermore, we do at least have a count of (very roughly) ~5,000 colleges in the USA and ~20MM students, which presents a maximum upper bound for the population. \n\nSo if we were to count up just the sexual harassment incidents in battered women's shelters, that would be pretty concerning if the count wasn't near zero, and we'd also have the count of ~1,500 such shelters in the USA to provide an upper bound for the population, even without collecting data on how many non-sexual-harassment interactions happen in such settings.", "185" ], [ "Do all of the buffs in <PERSON>'s NP count as just 1 for the purposes of nullification? That's really nasty. Does that include the heal-over-time, too?\n\nAnd it seems that <PERSON> uses her skills after dropping below 50% health then below 25% health; any idea if the nullify buff skills stack, so that, for instance, if you drop her from 51% to 24% in one shot, and she uses the skill twice in one turn, then your next 2 buffs will be nullified?", "991" ], [ "Each fills a different role.\n\n<PERSON> is good for her debuff & heal skills. However, her 3rd skill isn't available yet..\n\n<PERSON> and <PERSON> has a very *very* powerful single-target Noble Phantasm, and is pretty good at creating & using stars. However, using them optimally is a high-risk-high-reward endeavor, and they're generally one-and-done.\n\n<PERSON> is very good at survival with her triple-invul skill and her NP providing healing.\n\nSo choose 1 based on what you need now, and work on the others later. Note that having at least 1 AOE Rider is useful for farming Doors. And also that <PERSON> Mary has a very high ceiling as a damage dealer among any servant due to their NP.", "456" ], [ "One thing that stood out to me was how much the writer of the piece seems to rely on a shared article of faith with her readers. Much like how, say, if <PERSON> were writing for his audience, he wouldn't bother arguing that the bible is inerrant, he would just assume that the readers believed it too.\n\nFor instance, the exchange in one part you quoted:\n\n > “Half the men fail,” he says, meaning that they don’t procreate. “And no one cares about the men who fail.”\n > \n > I laugh, because it is absurd.\n\nIf the conversation went any further than <PERSON>'s \"disappointed\" response, she doesn't say it, and she doesn't bother explaining to the readers why <PERSON>'s statement was absurd. It may be incorrect, or it may be correct, but to claim that it's absurd without explanation, expecting the reader to buy it, is a statement of faith, like, say, the claim that <PERSON> built an ark to carry a bunch of animals during a 40-day worldwide flood.\n\nMore generally, looking at the title of the piece \"Jordan Peterson, Custodian of the Patriarchy\" and lots of parts of the piece such as this one: \n\n > The left, he believes, refuses to admit that men might be in charge because they are better at it. “The people who hold that our culture is an oppressive patriarchy, they don’t want to admit that the current hierarchy might be predicated on competence,” he said.\n\nthe core article of faith that's being invoked seems to be the patriarchy narrative. The 1st sentence of that paragraph, \"The left, he believes, refuses to admit that men might be in charge because they are better at it\" only makes sense as an interpretation of his quote \"The people who hold that our culture is an oppressive patriarchy, they don’t want to admit that the current hierarchy might be predicated on competence\" if you interpret his words through that faith. That is, <PERSON> clearly doesn't buy into that faith, and when he refers to the \"current hierarchy,\" he's not referring to the patriarchy narrative that \"men [are] in charge\" of the world, since he doesn't see things in terms of demographic groups, but rather of individuals.\n\nThis stuff probably struck me in particular because this sort of faith is what I was spoonfed all throughout my childhood, and I'm now a little more aware of things that had caused my cognitive faculties to shut down in order to protect against the cognitive dissonance.", "520" ], [ "I've read at least 1 report of someone saying that they saw their Cu's <PERSON> successfully do an instant kill on <PERSON>.\n\nJust keep in mind that all enemy servants have insanely high death resist, such that, by most estimates, the odds of getting an instant kill under the *best possible conditions* is still well under 1%.", "345" ], [ "> The problem is modern feminism's intellectual underpinnings are hostile to utilitarianism.\n\nI don't think it's this that's such a big problem as just honesty. *If* it is the case that modern feminism \"succeeding\" will mean 50% of men and some minority of women becoming absolutely miserable (as a feminist, I don't actually buy this, but *if*), then the line shouldn't be that feminism is beneficial for both men and women or that anyone who has basic human decency/empathy should be on our side. It should be, Fuck those 25% that we're gonna steamroll; I'm in the other 75% as is everyone I care about, so I just don't give a shit about the suffering of that 25%.", "278" ], [ "The piece is just chock full of selective quoting and connecting various lines from him with the author's own constructed summaries which are dripping with her personal interpretation, so I wouldn't be surprised if selective quoting were involved here.\n\nHowever, I doubt that NYTimes would publish outright fabricated quotes (sure, people like <PERSON> exist, but they're exceedingly rare), so I would guess that whatever is in quotation marks are accurate transcriptions of what <PERSON> actually said verbatim.\n\nI think it'd be interesting to watch or even just listen to the entire conversation between <PERSON> and the author uncut, from which the various quotes in this piece were taken and then stitched together with her summaries. I'm guessing such footage doesn't exist, which is a shame.", "622" ], [ "> I mean, sure, the interviewer takes it for granted most of her readers don’t believe women are genetically inferior to men and all the unearned privilege our society bestows on men is in fact deserved because its “predicated on competence”. \n\nFirst of all, the notion of women being genetically inferior to men is neither here nor there, because that's not even a faith, or a claim about reality - there's no actual true definition of \"inferior\" as it comes to genetics, at least in the general sense. At best, you can make a claim about inferiority *with respect to certain goals* - e.g. men are genetically inferior to women *when it comes to giving birth to a human child*, I am genetically inferior to <PERSON> *when it comes to playing basketball*, etc. \n\nThere's nothing in the piece that really touches on the concept of women being genetically inferior to men - in general or in specific avenues - so this just seems to be a non sequitur. \n\nThe 2nd part:\n\n > the interviewer takes it for granted most of her readers don’t believe... all the unearned privilege our society bestows on men is in fact deserved because its “predicated on competence”. \n\nis a bit more substantive. Now, taken literally, the statement is actually a tautology, because anything that's *unearned* privilege is, by definition, undeserved. And like any tautology, it's completely vapid and devoid of meaning. \n\nBut to engage with what I believe is actually meant, it's that her readers believe that society bestows upon men unearned privilege over women, and that this unearned privilege is what is generally referred to when people use phrases like \"male privilege.\" \n\nThis is a nontrivial empirical claim about reality, and it needs to be supported by actual science. The trouble is, that science isn't there. Which is why it's an article of faith. Now, as someone who was indoctrinated to this faith from a young age, it wouldn't surprise me if it's a safe assumption that much of her readership buys into this article of faith, but that doesn't make it any less an article of faith.", "177" ], [ "I wouldn't be surprised if that's what he said on the topic, but I would be quite shocked if that's *all* he said on the topic during the conversation. \n\nThen again, conversation is a multi-party activity. It's possible that that's all he got a chance to say due to however she reacted. If you're curious to hear how he talks when basically given free reign, I think the Joe Rogan Experience appearances are good, because <PERSON> is generally so good at letting his conversation partner talk as much as they want without interruption.", "622" ], [ "The 20% bonus from class matching is significant enough that you should try to match class whenever possible. But you should try to go all-in on a single servant for any given class. This is because it's far better to have 1 servant at level 80 than it is to have several servants at level 60. Most difficult fights are going to have you rely on just 1 hard hitting damage dealer being supported by others, so making that damage dealer as strong as possible is higher priority. \n\nI'd recommend prioritizing getting Herc to level 80 over anyone else - like all Berserkers, he does have problems staying alive, but he negates that weakness better than any other Berserker not named <PERSON>, and he hits hard against everyone thanks to his class and stat.", "163" ], [ "My guess was either the notion that half the men would fail without enforced monogamy to be absurd, or that no one would care about that half to be absurd. Those are empirical claims about reality which require support that she doesn't provide. \n\nThere's also the possibility that she's referring to stuff from before, Ie that enforced monogamy is a viable solution to such a problem. That could just be an issue of values rather than one of empirical reality, but without her actually going into the explanation for why it's absurd, it turns into a bald article of faith that such a solution is absurd.\n\nLooking at it again now, I also see the possibility that she sees as absurd notion that not procreating is \"failing,\" but that seems the biggest stretch for me, as that would then make <PERSON>'s disappointment at her lack of empathy justified, and this was clearly not written to give the reader such an impression.", "797" ], [ "> OP said two things, I made a response that encompassed both of them, as far as I can tell you're saying 'but why did you respond to the second one when they said the first one also?' If that objection doesn't make sense to you then maybe I'm not understanding your point.\n\nBut you *didn't* make a response that encompassed both of them, because you took those 2 things the OP said (i.e. 1. \"race is fuzzy\" and 2. \"it will be difficult to decide who actually gets to stay\") and treated the latter as separate from the former, when it's obvious from the OP that the latter is only within the context of the former.\n\nThere are many issues relating to how \"it will be difficult to decide who actually gets to stay\" for any sort of white nationalists' utopia to become reality, and the fuzziness of race is one of them. This doesn't mean that bringing up any issues relating to how \"it will be difficult to decide who actually gets to stay\" is actually a response to the OP. If you started talking about the logistical issues of relocating millions of people, that too would be \"responding\" to the issue of \"it will be difficult to decide who actually gets to stay,\" but it would have basically *nothing* to do with what the OP was talking about.\n\nLikewise, the potential dishonesty of white nationalists - i.e. they don't really believe in/care about the categories they are currently pushing, and will change them when it suits their preference - is another issue when it comes to \"it will be difficult to decide who actually gets to stay.\" This has marginally more to do with \"race is fuzzy\" than the above made-up example of relocation logistics, since such dishonesty is more easily enabled by the fuzziness of races, but ultimately the core of that issue is the dishonesty, which would remain an issue regardless of the fuzziness of race. That is, the fuzziness of race is superfluous to the argument that white nationalists don't really believe in/care about the categories they are currently pushing, and will change them when it suits their preference, and so you're not actually responding to the question about the apparent double standard of how the \"race is fuzzy\" criticism is applied. \n\nEspecially since your choice of Asians as one of your examples makes it clear that the core issue you're raising really is the dishonesty, entirely separate from the \"race is fuzzy\" point. \"Race is fuzzy\" making Asians and whites identified as the same race isn't a thing. <PERSON> won't somehow be identified as the same race as <PERSON> - rather, \"race is fuzzy\" is that <PERSON> will be identified as the same race as <PERSON> sometimes and as <PERSON> other times. Or that <PERSON> will be identified as the same race as <PERSON> sometimes and as <PERSON> other times.", "255" ], [ "> If it is to \"promote the general welfare,\" then perhaps AA is a reasonable policy. Eg, high levels of \"horizontal inequality\" - ie, economic inequality between groups - is associated with civil strife _URL_0_. \n\nPerhaps it is, perhaps it isn't. What's the rigorous data on whether or not AA reduces economic inequality? A priori, there seems to be little reason to believe that it would, and so *some* rigorous data showing empirically that AA has a positive influence on the \"promotion of the general welfare\" seems like the bare minimum bar we should want to meet. I've seen a ton of indications that AA has a negative influence on that: it's all anecdotal, no data, rigorous or otherwise, but that's still infinitely more indication than I've seen that AA has a positive influence on that.", "954" ], [ "I use 4-star Nero with damage CE, Spartacus, and Waver. Take 3 (sometimes 4, very rarely 2) turns in round 1 building NP. Use Spartacus NP in round 2, with face cards from Nero to take down the horse. Use Nero NP, which usually leaves <PERSON> with a few thousand HP, which Spartacus or Nero can face card. Usually 5 turns, sometimes 6, very rarely 4. \n\nAny AOE Saber should be able to substitute for Nero. Spartacus in particular is really useful here, though, because of his 30% NP charge. \n\nIf you use starting NP CEs like Golden Sumo or Kaleidoscope along with the plugsuit you might be able to make it quicker by using an NP to wipe the 1st wave and having <PERSON> and <PERSON> get their NPs up through a combination of Waver and starting NP CE. But I prefer to put more drop CEs on.", "122" ], [ "> My understanding is that the Harvard case alleges intentional discrimination against Asian applicants (eg, giving them low scores on personality, etc) as opposed to the case being a challenge to affirmative action per se. \n\nThe intentional discrimination against Asian applicants *is* the affirmative action that's being challenged. That's the exact mechanism by which affirmative action works in this case. Affirmative action isn't a single rigorously defined program of discrimination, it's a general cluster of discriminatory policies which includes this specific one taken on by Harvard to discriminate against Asian applicants.\n\n > More broadly, I am not familiar with the exact numbers re Harvard, but the general claim I hear is that Asians need an SAT score of X to get into elite schools, while non-Asians need lower SAT scores. As I mention above, that can be entirely explained by Asians applying disproportionately to Engineering and other highly competitive colleges. \n\nNo it can't. The SAT score differential comes from data on Harvard's undergrad admissions (among other places), which is just one school. It's *specifically* when doing a *like-for-like comparison* that we see that, with all-else being equal including the specific school one is applying to, *being Asian* means you get an effective penalty on your admissions score compared to not being Asian.", "205" ], [ "> All it needs to entail is putting politeness or niceness or whatever you want to call it over your world view. And we all do that all the time surely?\n\nDo we? I see politeness and niceness as *part of* my world view. And whenever there's something that contradicts my world view that's put forward with the justification that it's polite or nice, my world view wins out. I say \"please\" and \"thank you\" and even \"you're welcome\" and \"bless you\" because they're polite, nice, *and* congruent with my world view. If someone is a horrible singer and asks for my opinion, it might be *polite* or *nice* to lie to them that they're decent, but that would contradict my world view that people deserve to get accurate assessments of their abilities when they ask, so I tell them the truth that they're horrible. In as polite and nice words as I can, of course, but I won't be *so* polite or nice as to lie to them.\n\nBut if we presume for a moment that we *do* do this all the time as you assert, this presents another interesting issue, which is that this sort of thing flows in all directions. \n\nJust because you, just to be polite to a person you know, don't object when someone else uses pronouns you don't identify with to describe you, it doesn't follow that you have to believe in their truth about your pronouns or \"real\" gender or whatever. You can keep your own world view while letting others continue to use whatever pronouns they choose to use, no matter how much those pronouns contradict your world view. \n\nSome people could claim that trans people suffer harm from others openly contradicting their world view with regards to their identified gender, but that also goes in all directions: there's no particular reason to believe that the harm they suffer is any greater than the harm suffered by anyone who is compelled or otherwise pushed to use words that directly contradict their own world view. One could argue that there's a case to be made that since this has to do with the trans person's own identity, that they could claim greater harm, but one could just argue just as well that there's an equally reasonable case to be made that since this has to do with the speaker's choice of words that come out of their own mouths modulated by their own brains, that *they* could claim greater harm. And I don't think there's much in the way of empirical evidence on this, from my looking.", "847" ], [ "> The middle one was deeply unhinged. <PERSON> and <PERSON> are trying to get to trans people murdered?!\n\nCan't see the tweet, but this sort of rhetoric has been basically standard for at least a few years now. The chain of reasoning goes something like: \n\n * Publicly arguing that trans-X aren't \"real\" X or that people ought to be free not to have to refer to them by their preferred pronouns will convince some people that trans-X aren't \"real\" X.\n * The phenomenon of straight men murdering a trans woman after initially believing that she was a cis woman is semi-common and is based on the notion that trans women aren't \"real\" women.\n * Therefore, when people like <PERSON> or <PERSON> argue against the trans activists' demands, they will cause more trans women to be murdered. \n\nNow, one might claim that even presuming that the above bullet points are true (a largely unsupported presumption), that it doesn't follow that they're *trying* to get trans women murdered, because *they* presumably don't believe it's true, or place the responsibility to not murder people on the individuals doing/not doing the murdering. However, another premise is that the above bullet points are *so obviously true* that clearly anyone who doesn't believe it are doing so out of either ignorance or malevolence; and people like <PERSON> and <PERSON> have no excuse being ignorant. Thus either they are *knowingly* doing things that will get trans people murdered or they are *recklessly disregarding truth* in a way that will get people murdered.\n\nThis is the same sort of reasoning that causes people to state completely unironically that using the term \"trap\" to refer to people and characters (typically anime characters) who are male but appear female on first glance causes the murder of trans people.", "847" ], [ "I mean, you're far more likely to get run over by a car than be eaten by a shark, but someone who literally spends 100% of his time on the beach and in the ocean swimming is pretty justified in fearing being eaten by a shark more than being run over by a car.\n\nIt strikes me that the people who fear being fired for saying things-interpreted-to-be-mean on Twitter are far more likely to say things-interpreted-to-be-mean on Twitter than they are to advocate for unionization or actively complain on Facebook about conditions at their work. \n\nIt also strikes me that, from what I've noticed, <PERSON> people who agitate against firing people for things-interpreted-to-be-mean on Twitter tend to agitate against firing people for advocating for unionization to *just as much an extent*, relative to how high profile such incidents become in the news.", "633" ], [ "> Re income inequality, it is my understanding that a degree from an elite college is a ticket to the upper reaches of the income distribution (though not a guaranteed ticket, nor the only ticket). Indeed, that understanding is apparently shared by the Asian applicants who oppose affirmative action; otherwise, why would they care? So, AA should be expected to decrease income inequality, at least if you define it based on percentages who at the top of the income distribution. It is possible that a degree from an elite college does not have that effect on AA admittees, but I don't have that evidence. \n\nI believe your understanding is incomplete. From what little research on education I've done, I don't believe a degree from an elite college is a ticket to the upper reaches of the income distribution. The evidence I've seen is that it's a ticket *for some individuals* and not a ticket *for some other individuals*. The Asian applicants who oppose affirmative action believe, with some justification - they actually meet the objective standards which indicate that they're in that group - that they're in the former group of people, which is why they care. \n\nAlso, I notice you didn't mention race in this paragraph, but rather income inequality. AA doesn't distinguish between people based on income, but rather based on race. Race is a *proxy* for income, but due to <PERSON>'s law, there's little reason to believe that the proxy holds when race is explicitly targeted as a criteria for admissions. \n\n > I am curious what your evidence is that AA has a negative influence on the general welfare\n\nLet me repeat that this is not rigorous, and completely anecdotal. I've noticed that AA, which are policies that, by definition, are explicitly racially discriminatory, has caused individuals of certain races to group together and antagonize one another on the basis of their differential treatment under AA. I believe that individuals of certain races deciding to group together and antagonize individuals of other races is bad for the general welfare of any society, but particularly one with individuals from such a diversity of races like the USA.", "205" ], [ "> Except this is a fully generalizable argument. I can then claim it would harm me not to be able to call someone a small minded evil bigot for refusing to use a requested pronoun. And then they can claim it would harm them not to say that I am a liberal brainwashed cuck or something. Then it's just insults all the way down.\n\nWell, yes. That's part of my point. The argument that calling trans people by their preferred pronouns because it would harm them to do otherwise is a fully generalizable argument that you can apply to anything, which is why it's a *terrible* argument.\n\n\n > Part of society is abiding by the politeness standards of the community you dwell within. Those will change over time and we should adapt as they do. Those are norms that have evolved over long times to stop us from ripping each others faces off when we live in close proximity. And yes that will feel bad when you think the standards are wrong, but those are the breaks of gaining all the advantages human society gives.\n\nWell sure. And people either *incorporate those standards into their world view* - such as how I incorporated saying \"you're welcome\" into my world view, even though the standard seemed absurd to me initially - or they refuse and leave/get evicted by that community.\n\nBut perhaps this is a semantic issue, and you'd say that *incorporating politeness standards into your world view* is just another way of saying \"putting politeness over your world view,\" which seems reasonable to me. That then raises the issues I brought up earlier of this argument going in all directions. \n\nSome people are declaring that the standard of politeness is \"use pronouns based on the subject's preference,\" while others are disagreeing that such a standard exists, and that the general baseline standard of politeness of \"let others use the words they wish to use\" is what's actually correct. As you write, these norms have evolved over long times, and we don't have a stone tablet to refer to to determine who is correct, and so these groups get to argue with each other on which standard we ought to adopt in our shared society (the one that neither side really has exit ability from).\n\nBut what we definitely know *isn't* correct is the supposition that putting politeness over your world view means having to call someone else by their preferred pronouns; no, one could argue *just as validly* that putting politeness over your world view means having to accept it when someone else refers to you by a pronoun you don't identify as.", "847" ], [ "> I think this is about what you said, but a bit more general in the forms I've generally heard it.\n\nI agree, but I think your more general use of the terms makes the bullets less comprehensible, which is why I didn't use generic, loosely-defined terms like \"social recognition,\" or \"derision.\" \n\nTo the people who make these claims, the idea that people like <PERSON> or <PERSON>, in arguing against self-declared trans activists, are opposing recognizing/respecting trans folks or affording them less social recognition than they are due is obvious fact, something they believe in just as much as <PERSON> believes that <PERSON> built an Ark to survive a genocidal flood. However, this is something that many people, especially people on this board, disagree with them on, so I used more specific terms that I thought would be more generally agreed as being true.", "847" ], [ "> The last part is where I totally disagree with you - for instance, I saw many people, including supposedly 'reasonable' conservatives, talking about how it was the end of the world that <PERSON> couldn't get into Harvard, because he said terrible things about a classmate, that was recorded in a Google doc.\n > \n > OTOH, all those conservatives all support less power for unions, etc. and even the supposed populist conservatives that are standing up to Silicon Valley are also anti-union (<PERSON>, etc.). \n\nFair enough, I don't pay much attention to conservatives, because AFAICT, they just don't matter in the whole anti-SJW cluster of people. The anti-SJW/IDW cluster, AFAICT, are overwhelmingly liberal and leftwing like myself, so it's their behavior that I'm drawing my impression from. I 100% believe you that there are tons of unprincipled conservatives who performatively take outsized offense at leftwing attacks on free speech while quietly ignoring the rightwing ones. After all, I see the mirror phenomenon happening all the time with my peers on the left, and it would be bizarre to me if conservatives/right-wingers were more principled and well behaving than leftists.\n\n > Now, I suppose there some liberal anti-SJW's who are supposedly pro-union, but usually, their response is a single Tweet, that says, \"this is also bad,\" before they write up their next 5,000 word story or 25 tweetstorm about how free speech is dead on college campuses. \n\nThis doesn't match my experience, but if that's your experience, I think your impression is reasonable.\n\n > Also, I'd point out the fact that stories about somebody being fired because they say a mean thing on Twitter become news, while somebody being fired because they try to organize a union is in large part because of our corporate right-wing dominated (on economic issues) media, that's complicit, along with a partisan right wing media that of course, cares about the culture war, with a bonus of making sure nobody hears about union organizers being fired. \n\nIs this a fact? What convinced you of this being a fact, and could you point me to it so that I can be convinced of this being a fact?", "965" ], [ "> No, it isn't. They are separate issues. See the separate arguments made here _URL_0_\n\nThat's a 78 page document, and the phrase \"affirmative action\" doesn't appear anywhere from a Ctrl-F. Could you either point me to the paragraphs that show that discrimination against Asian applicants isn't a form of affirmative action or summarize the argument? \n\n > I am talking about elite schools in general, not just Harvard, and specifically re claims commonly made in the media.\n\nAnd so am I, drawing on the Harvard-specific data set that we actually had access to.\n\nAgain, all the evidence we've seen show that, *holding all else equal*, being an Asian gives you a penalty in admissions to elite colleges. You've put forth a completely unsupported hypothesis about Asian students applying more to technical schools as well as about schools wanting to balance student interests and Asian students disproportionately preferring STEM fields, but as they say, that which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. You are free to come up with all the hypotheticals you want, but there's no reason for anyone to consider your hypotheticals plausible or even believable unless you provide specific evidence.", "205" ], [ "> Oh absolutely there will be times where changes are propagating. But most people here seem to have come to the conclusion that the Overton Window has shifted, that they will be fired and de-personed for misgendering someone etc. **If that's the case society has ALREADY moved on** and we either move with it or we show that we are no longer part of civil society. \n\n(Bolding mine)\n\nI don't think the bolded part is true. I think breaking social norms can cause one to be fired and de-personed, but the converse doesn't follow; just because someone is legitimately fearful of being fired and de-personed for a certain action, it doesn't follow that the certain action breaks a social norm.\n\nAnd from looking the actual mechanism by which this happens, I think this is pretty clear. It's a tiny proportion of the populace that actually even cares about enforced pronoun use, and an even tinier proportion actually does the enforcing. The fact that these people are particularly effective at this enforcement right now doesn't imply that the norms they enforce are the norms that society in general has decided upon. It just means that there are certain subsections of society where people are cowed by their norms. That's not an issue of politeness norms, that's an issue of power.\n\nUnless you mean to say that politeness norms are what people who have the power to punish people choose to enforce. In which case it would follow that sometimes breaking politeness norms in favor of one's own world view is desirable and beneficial to society and something worth encouraging depending on the case.", "402" ], [ "> This really does seem to be the fundamental liberal/progressive split, where liberalism is about designing institutions for people and progressivism is about designing people for institutions.\n\nThis reminds me of a thought that occurred to me after I read *Brave New World* as a progressive teenager and talked about it with some people. Which was that, \"The difference between someone who is progressive and someone who isn't is that a progressive sees *Brave New World* as a legitimate successful *u*topia rather than a *dys*topia.\" \n\nSince then, I've learned that I'm more of a liberal than a progressive, though I continue to agree with my younger self that I think the real world turning into *Brave New World* would be a good thing.", "285" ], [ "> And yes I kinda do mean that politeness norms are what people who have power decide upon. Though I would argue the people in power part is an aggregate of what each person believes that comes to some kind of equilibrium. Weighted by individual power perhaps?\n\nOK, so if politeness norms are purely power-based, then it follows that overriding politeness norms with one's own world view is sometimes good and desirable for the improvement of society. The fact that powerful people decided to enforce some social norm doesn't imply that that social norm is at all good for the society, whether that be for its thriving or stability or anything else. And thus the argument that goes along the lines of \"X is the politeness norm, therefore you should do X even if that means overriding your own world view\" is faulty; the argument would have to include some extra component that makes some positive case for the specific politeness norm in question being something good and desirable for our society. \n\n > And yes you absolutely can try to change norms you think are wrong, but don't then complain that society is ostracizing you. You are the one choosing to put your beliefs over the **majority** so you accept the individual risk in return for a chance of change. You could absolutely argue that that's what the gay and trans rights movements did/are doing after all. Also don't be surprised if \"society\" selects for stability not truth. That's kind of its job. Conformity is a strength when it comes to keeping a society together.\n\n(Bolding mine)\n\nIt seems to me that the gay and trans rights movements succeeded in part *because* they tried to change norms and complained whenever society decided to ostracize them for it. So I think it follows that complaining that society is ostracizing you is a good thing to do if society ostracizes you on the basis of you trying to change norms you think are wrong.\n\nAlso, the bolded part doesn't follow from what you wrote in the previous quoted paragraph. You are choosing to put your beliefs over the **powerful**, which *might* be the majority, but which also might not. In the realm of democracies where power flows in large part from popularity, there's an argument that the powerful *reflects* the majority, but looking at the mechanism of \"cancel culture,\" it seems pretty clear to me that it's not a democratic realm.", "647" ], [ "> I think we agree - I mentioned that it is not a guaranteed ticket, and also thatis possible that a degree from an elite college does not have that effect on AA admittees\n\nOK, so it seems that you agree that there's no reason to believe that AA admittees are in the group of people for whom an elite college degree is a ticket. Then it follows that there's no reason to believe that AA will help to uplift the incomes of poor AA admittees, and thus there's no reason to believe that AA will help to equalize income inequality.\n\n > Yes, because I originally made reference to research that inequality between groups can contribute to violence between those groups, so I said that AA would reduce that by decreasing inequality between groups (**at least as measured by the pct of each group who are at the top of the income distribution**). I should have been more clear, and said \"AA should be expected to decrease income inequality between groups\" -- left off the last two words.\n\n(Bolding mine)\n\nOK, it seems the part I bolded is the key here. You're measuring inequality between racial groups by \"% of that group who are at the top of the income distribution.\" \n\nFirst of all, I haven't seen any evidence that \"% of racial group who are at the top of the income distribution\" - which measures something very *very* different from income inequality between racial groups - contributes to civil strife. The abstract of the [article you linked](_URL_0_) doesn't specify if your particular definition of income inequality - having to do with % of a group at the top of the income distribution - was what they were measuring with respect to horizontal inequality. \n\nAnd second, again, given that there is no reason to believe that an elite college degree will be a ticket to the top of the income distribution for AA admittees, it follows that there's no reason to believe that AA will result in less inequality, by your particular definition of income inequality.\n\n\n > i think (anecdotally as well) that that is pretty rare. And even if it happens, why does that imply that AA is not, on balance, good for the general welfare? [And, again, it might not be, but my point is that the original post completely ingnored that issue)\n\nI never said that that implies that AA is not, on balance, good for the general welfare. I said that I've seen exactly zero indication that AA does anything positive for general welfare, and loads of anecdotes that it does terrible things for general welfare. This doesn't mean that AA isn't, on balance, good for the general welfare, but this does mean that we'd need *some* evidence or at least indication that AA is, on balance, good for the general welfare for us to support it.", "205" ], [ "> The section entitled \"HARVARD CONSIDERS RACE IN THE MANNER PERMITTED BY PRECEDENT\" is a reference to the affirmative action argument - the precedents are affirmative action cases. That is on page 58 of the filing. The lion's share is re the central, and separate, issue that Harvard intentionally discriminates against Asians (as opposed to in favor of Hispanics and African Americans, per affirmative action)\n\nThank you. I read that section, and I couldn't find anywhere in there that argued that Harvard's discrimination against Asians isn't part of Affirmative Action. Could you point out to me where they make this argument or summarize it for me? \n\nAFAICT, that section is Harvard responding to a set of SFFA's arguments that Harvard isn't meeting the standards they have to follow as set by court precedent, by citing the stuff Harvard *is* doing that meets those standards. But just because Harvard's AA program does various things that *don't* discriminate against Asians, it doesn't follow that the AA program doesn't discriminate against Asians. It can do 2 things at the same time.\n\n > Re my evidence, I taught for many years at a Calif high school and have had many conversations with counselors about admissions stats (which is why I am familiar with the UCs). About half of our students were Asian American, the rest being African American or Hispanic. The patterns I discussed were certainly true of our students. Re schools balancing interests, I have attended admissions sessions at several elite East Coast schools on seven occasions each when chaperoning college tours, and they all said that they look to balance the incoming freshman class in the manner that I describe.\n\nOK, so you have some anecdotes. *At best*, you can use that to draw conclusions about the *specific students and schools with whom you interacted*. But even that's faulty, because you didn't collect data in a rigorous way and are going off memory. \n\nSo, again, if you want to make up some hypotheses based on your anecdotes, you're welcome to, but the rest of us are free to reject them as being unsupported.", "205" ], [ "Leveling up her 1st skill to level 4 means she'll charge 20% NP, which makes it possible to make her NP immediately with a Kaleidoscope. \n\nHer big use is against male Sabers, so leveling up her 2nd skill to raise the probability of her charm landing can be very useful, too. Even if you won't reach 100% until you hit level 10, getting up to at least level 4 by just using blue & red gems is probably well worth it.", "163" ], [ "If you know that you're gonna kill all the drunk men in a given turn, it can be useful to use <PERSON>'s crit star skill in that turn, instead of on the 1st turn of <PERSON>. That's because the stars <PERSON> generates will be used on the 1st turn of <PERSON>, but his Def down debuff won't matter for the 1 turn going from round 1 to round 2. Plus, that also means you get the crit star skill on cool down earlier.\n\nIt's minor, but basically erasing 1/3 of the disadvantage of Hans's Def debuff is nice, and every advantage you can get matters in 3BP.", "922" ], [ "Have you tried making use of your taunters to eat NPs?\n\nFor everything but the current Saber day, I've been using the following team with good success:\n\nFront line of Jeanne - Scathach - Waver, back line of <PERSON> or <PERSON>.\n\nWhat I'd do is to use <PERSON>'s NP ASAP, use <PERSON>'s NP to stall enemy NP gain, and have <PERSON>'s stun in my back pocket to stall <PERSON> for 1 turn if needed. I'll sometimes use <PERSON>'s NP during turn 1 or 2 if I have it charged, just to top up everyone's HP, prevent 1 turn of damage, and buff up the defense for 1 turn - but otherwise, I'll save <PERSON>'s NP for Ibaraki's NP.\n\nAfter using Scathach's NP on Ibaraki, I'll focus on taking down the hands while charging NP. I'll trade out <PERSON> for Mash if Ibaraki is about to NP, and I can't use Jeanne's stun or NP to block it. Then <PERSON> would buff up everyone's defense, give either <PERSON> or <PERSON> invincibility + some extra NP charge, and then eat the NP and go down, bringing out <PERSON> or <PERSON>.\n\nThe focus at this point will be on keeping <PERSON> alive as long as possible while she takes down <PERSON> (assuming both hands are gone already). <PERSON>/Georgios will usually die before <PERSON> NPs again, but that'll bring out <PERSON>, who can hopefully use her NP or stun to stall for 1 more turn. Then comes out Cu for hopefully a few more turns, if needed.\n\nIt seems you don't have a Scathach, but if you substitute your Jalter, you might be able to do something similar. <PERSON> doesn't have the nice guaranteed stun on her NP, but she does have an invincibility, which you should prioritize using for that feature, rather than for the Buster up. And obviously your level 100 Jalter's gonna hit much harder than my level 90 NP1 Scathach. And <PERSON>'s crit star skill can be killer in combination with <PERSON>'s crit skill.", "97" ], [ "Rider hands when basically every comp I've used has relied heavily on a support 10/10/10 Waver sounds rather nightmarish. I do have a level 100 10/10/10 Assassin Shiki I'd like to whip out for this, but I'm afraid Waver will just go down too quickly to make this work. \n\nI wonder if it will be viable to try to take down the hands ASAP within 2 or 3 turns using Shiki, so that it then basically becomes just like any other day. But then <PERSON> as DPS isn't all that great compared to the units I'd been using up to now - Scathach & Orion - as her NP doesn't offer the advantages of guaranteed stun or NP drain like those 2.\n\nI'll probably stick my MLB Ushi CE on <PERSON> on my support list, at least.", "395" ], [ "In terms of banners to pull on, it's generally best to wait for banners where servants you like get rate-ups, and then pull on them, unless you literally don't care which 4-star or 5-star servant you get. Personally, I think waiting for rate-ups just to reduce the chances of getting spooked by Fionn or Stheno is worth it alone.\n\nAlso, keep in mind that the guaranteed 5-star banner for the anniversary will require 30 paid quartz, so saving up the quartz you have won't really help you with that one. \n\nFor handling the story, you can't get by in this game with just 1 strong unit, even if that 1 unit is <PERSON>. Build up the 3/2/1-star units you get from your daily Friend Point summons. Hans & Cursed Arm Hassan are great 2-star units for supporting <PERSON> with stars. But there are plenty of other servants who will be able to help you out, like <PERSON> or <PERSON> for their team-wide offensive buffs, <PERSON> for her buff clear, <PERSON> for keeping you from losing if things go sideways, <PERSON> & <PERSON> for being able to out-damage <PERSON> when facing some Sabers some of the time, or <PERSON> for his team-wide protection. Also taunt units like Georgios, Leonidas, and Mash can help you deal with hard content by protecting your Jalter for enough turns for her to destroy the enemy.", "395" ], [ "IIRC, the ones that come to you directly from completing singularities aren't all that great. But you should eventually get NP5 of every 3-star and below servant anyway, just from the friend point pulls, even if it'll take several months. Try playing around with the ones you have and finding ones that match your style.\n\nAnd keep in mind that farming the daily Chaldea Gate quests for Embers, Monuments/Pieces/Gems, and QP is a big part of the game, and thus investing in some good farmers is a good idea. For the Embers and QP, you'll want good AOE Berserkers and Riders, such as <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON>.", "910" ], [ "I think your best shot might be maxing out <PERSON> & Hans, then taking Hans - Okita - support Waver front line with taunter - taunter - Cu at the back. Spam their NPs to keep the Def buffs & healing up while also stalling <PERSON>'s NPs. Switch in taunters to eat Ibaraki's NPs. Even so, it's gonna be tough, since <PERSON> even at level 65 and max Fous can die in 1 unlucky crit, even with all the buffs.\n\nUnfortunately, tomorrow is Rider day, which means a front line with Hans & Waver are gonna almost surely fail. And even if you max out <PERSON>, <PERSON> & Waver are still gonna be left exposed to the hands for a few turns. \n\nYou could try having a front line with taunter - Okita/Jack - support Waver, with Hans - taunter - Cu at the back, to protect <PERSON> & Waver as much as possible from the start of the fight, too. That'll require you to get your taunters up to as high a level as possible, so they can tank more than just 1 hit.\n\nAnd none of these strategies are gonna work if you don't 1st get your damage dealers up to max level.", "128" ], [ "Hm, I wonder if <PERSON> would be strong enough to clear the hands if he just had a MLB Carp for the 50% starting NP. Along with 2 other Carps + 1 MLB Carp from support, that's +300% damage for him, compared to +500% damage if he had a non-MLB Ushi CE. Including the base 100%, that's a drop of 1/3 of the damage. Maybe it'd do enough damage that the hands could be taken down with regular attacks within the same turn as his NP.", "913" ], [ "Haha I see, you've got a pretty darn good setup for maxing Santa Alter's damage there.\n\nI ended up giving it a shot anyway and did come out the other end alive, with about 4.7MM damage dealt, which is a win in my book, but the fight was too close for me to try again. I only had +300% from Carps - 1 MLB, 2 normal, 1 support MLB, and a support Waver 10/10/10, and I lack a Jalter for her nice double buff, and my Santa Alter mana burst is at 6, so those hands stayed around for quite a few turns after her NP, but I had some good luck with Waver hanging on until I got rid of them, and also <PERSON> targeting my Mash when everyone was naked.\n\nI think I'll spend some of the rice balls I'd been hoarding for today's 2BP Quests, so I can reach 20MM and get those Feathers & Hearts.", "913" ], [ "There's no pity mechanic in the gacha. The odds of getting an SSR is always 1% for every single roll. The only exceptions are the twice-yearly guaranteed 5-star banners, which can only be pulled on once each, and which require at least 30 paid Saint Quartz.\n\nLeveling up is done by use of Embers, which are materials that drop from enemies - playing Quests only levels up your servants' Bond levels, which don't affect their gameplay abilities until you hit Bond level 10, which requires somewhere on the order of a year's worth of regular playing. You always have access to daily Quests that will always drop a set number of Embers, though.", "734" ], [ "I think I'd be happy enough with just buff cleanse after damage and/or like 10-20% defense down after damage. Doing buff cleanse before damage would be awesome, but it's such an overpowered ability that I think there's a good reason why so few servants have it. And both buff cleanse & def down do fit her lore somewhat.\n\nBut you know what? I'd really be just content if they made it so that when either Void Shiki or <PERSON> successfully did an instakill, that they gained NP charge from their Arts NP at Overkill rate, instead of gaining 0 NP like they do now. It's just annoying that when something that's supposed to be good happens, you also get penalized for it, especially in the case of Assassin Shiki where it does hurt her significant NP spam ability.", "884" ], [ "Once at the anniversary, which is coming up in a month or so, and then once at Thanksgiving. In JP, they did it on New Year's, so I don't know if they'll change the Thanksgiving one around this year.\n\nAlso, I forgot, there *is* a pity mechanic, but it's only useful for people who spend in the order of 10s of thousands of dollars in the game, or just have ridiculous god-level luck. Basically, if you collect more than 5 of any given SSR, you get an item for every 1 after the 5th one, and if you have 10 of those items, you can trade it in for a SSR servant of your choice (that's available on a current banner). That means you need, at a minimum, to have pulled 15 SSRs (that's a best case scenario, where you pulled 15 of the SAME SSR). I've been playing this game since day 1 and have spent a couple hundred $ and have pulled only 10 SSRs so far.", "835" ], [ "Hey, you can always use them in the rerun! With 0 drops, that's 12 from both events, which is enough to have 2 MLB + 2 regular. Since you already got 2 drops, if you get just 1 more drop, you'll be able to run 3 MLB Carps, which means +300% for everyone with 1 CE slot still left open! +400% for everyone with a support MLB Carp, and +700% for your damage dealer with a MLB Ushi.", "805" ], [ "It's almost never worth it to fuse 5-star CEs until you have at least 5, IMHO. Fusing 2 will raise its level cap, but the stat increase isn't all that significant anyway, and that's *only if* you invest heavily in the CEs & QP required to actually level it up.\n\nOn the other hand, with 2 Formal Crafts, you can potentially field a team with 2 Arts-based attackers who will both gain the benefit of stronger Arts cards & more NP gain. That 25% Arts bonus, when used on the right servants, is far more valuable than the little bit of extra stats you can get on 1 servant.", "163" ], [ "Maybe it's just because of recency, but listening to this episode this morning, when the English teacher who escalated the issue (<PERSON>, I think?) called the student who set up the TPUSA table (<PERSON>, I think?) a \"<PERSON>\" - \"a white girl/woman who weaponizes her white privilege\" or something like that - I couldn't help but be reminded of the term \"<PERSON>\" and \"<PERSON>\" from the incel crowd. Maybe this sort of thing happens more often than I realize, but this is only the latest among a bunch of similarities between the SJW & incel crowd I noticed.", "389" ], [ "I don't know what's going on, but I got 7 drops of this CE while only using natural regen AP (OK, a couple copper apples here and there when I didn't have 30AP to run a Quest, as well as 1 Master level up, but still). And I've even been burning 80AP each day the last week on the daily Ember & Class quests. I'm thinking putting 2 MLB ones on supports will give me a pseudo-2030, which I still don't have despite dropping 240SQ on Scathach's banner way back in the day.", "734" ], [ "I've been spending almost all my farming at the Samurai node, for the Feather and Claw drops. Been needing both of those for Altera/Nero skills as well as ascending Billy.\n\nThe drops are pretty bad, though. Did get double claws once, but the vast majority of the runs net just QP. That said, getting like 2MM QP on a single 30AP run is pretty satisfying.", "734" ], [ "I thought this was unfortunately just as much talking-past-each-other as JBP's podcasts with <PERSON>. \n\nOne big thing that stood out to me was that they don't really define \"god\" at the start of the conversation or anything, and thus end up talking about different things which causes them to be confused about each other - including that one time when <PERSON> seemed to get visibly angry at <PERSON> for using \"so you're saying\" at him. As far as I can tell, <PERSON> disbelieves in a supernatural god in exactly the same way that <PERSON> does, and <PERSON> believes in a metaphorical god in exactly the same way that <PERSON> does - that is, <PERSON> is an atheist by <PERSON>'s lights, but <PERSON> is a theist by <PERSON>'s - but neither of them see it that way. I think the answer about Crime & Punishment was pretty illuminating on this - to <PERSON>, anyone who doesn't truly create their own values from whole cloth, unbound even from their own biologically-derived moral intuitions, is a theist, whereas to <PERSON>, merely believing that one disbelieves in a god is enough. Also why <PERSON> sees the emergent morality in behavior of other animals as evidence of a (non-literal, non-supernatural) god, while <PERSON> sees it as the exact opposite.\n\nI liked it toward the end when <PERSON> talked about how he's cool with all the metaphorical goodness notions of god, but has his issue with all the supernatural claims - I wish talk of that thread had dominated their conversation instead.", "520" ], [ "> For my part, I think social justice has long since reached the point of decreasing marginal returns. It was easier to convince people that everyone should be treated equally in the law, because you could appeal to fallacies in racist thinking or ideology. It was harder to convince people to support forms of racial redistribution to address issues we saw in culture, not just in our legal system. It’s hardest to convince people about things like microaggressions, diversity for the sake of diversity, etc. because at every step more and more people became skeptical about how useful it would do.\n\nI don't have much to add, but I think your insight about SJ being something akin to religious fundamentalism is a good one, and it's one I had myself a few years ago. And I think the above paragraph I quoted points to the faith that underlies the ideology that makes it so much like a religion. Equal treatment under the law is easily empirically verifiable, at least in principle, and even to some extent in practice. So one can clearly empirically prove that a problem exists and convince people to get on board in solving that problem, like the Civil Rights movements of the mid-late-20th Century USA.\n\nIssues in culture are *also* empirically verifiable, but the ones that are raised by SJ tend not to be empirically verified. Furthermore, any scrutiny is labeled as a bad act, and empirical evidence that does exist tend to get scrutinized based on how well they support the pre-existing narrative rather than actual scientific competence - hence why we *still* see the Implicit Association Test and the related concept of Implicit Bias held up by SJ as something useful for getting a grip on biases. \n\nAnd stuff involving microagressions are just intrinsically empirically unverifiable, because microagressions by definition involve *only* the subjective internal judgments of individuals - that is, the term \"microaggression\" is defined such that if someone declares something a \"microaggression,\" then it is so. \"Diversity for the sake of diversity\" is also just a terminal value, though one could steelman it into an empirical claim about \"diversity leads to better outcomes,\" which runs into the problem in the previous paragraph that the empirical evidence for that is severely lacking, and any desire to investigate further without putting your thumb on the scale is seen as a hostile and worthy of being shut down.\n\nI graduated college just before all this stuff gained steam, though in retrospect I did see some signs of it while at school - one was a workshop I had in high school where we were asked to define \"racism\" and told that our definitions were wrong because they were race-neutral and didn't point to the \"structural systems by which white people have advantages over people of other races,\" or something like that; another was being asked in college to sign some statement about not abusing intimate partners, as if it was a big issue that I declare this publicly. But after college I was turned on to a lot of this stuff from attending a feminist anime group online where we'd have Skype chats about such issues, and learning that discussion and scrutiny based on ideas rather than on the gender/race/sexuality category of the speaker were verboten in these chats. \n\nI've always been far left and pro-SJ issues, and I still am far left and pro-SJ issues, though I see myself turning more toward left (neo-?)liberalism as my views evolve. But at this point, I've personally come to the conclusion that the SJ ideology is so clearly anti-intellectual and pro-faith in exactly the same way that religions are, and also no less harmful, that it'd be far more beneficial - not only to the cis/straight/white/male oppressor majority but *even more to the very same oppressed people the SJWs are purporting to help* - for the whole movement to burn to the ground than for them to continue to gain power and influence.", "68" ], [ "> The IDW's main opponent seem to be university campus activists, already a group that are more reviled and less influential than they are. \n\nI think this may be at the crux of the issue. Unfortunately, I'm not sure there are objective definitions and measures of \"revulsion\" and \"influence\" that we can use to empirically test this claim. But I believe the IDW & its fans would say the exact opposite as you.\n\nI would, too, but I also imagine my judgment is biased heavily by the fact that I live in one of the bluest of blue areas in the USA. \n\nBut perhaps that then points to the fact that different contexts in different clumps of society matter a lot; it's possible that university campus activists are more reviled and less influential than IDW in the population of USA/English-speaking world/Earth, but it's also possible that it's the exact opposite in certain subsets of those, and the IDW cares a lot more about those subsets than the entire population.", "859" ], [ "I must say, getting smeared multiple times on a publication as influential and popular as Vox, or being falsely labeled a bigot or extremist by SPLC, or being hunted on your own college campus by students with baseball bats while the college prez specifically orders security not to protect you seem pretty darn consequential. Far more so than receiving an unlimited amount of arbitrarily mean tweets and messages on the internet.", "633" ], [ "> Is that the most important thing, though? Does it matter at the social level? Enough for this level of publicity for this quest?\n\nWell, who knows what the most important thing is, anyway? But in terms of whether it matters at the social level, I think it absolutely does. There's a ton of legal policy that either follow downstream from or are heavily influenced by such groups. And that's not even counting the soft power of pop culture and such, which have both direct effects and indirect feedback effects.\n\nEnough for this level of publicity? Well, that would depend a lot on who's being asked, I would guess. For the author of that NYTimes piece, obviously yes. I would guess from what I've heard from the IDW \"members\" mentioned in the piece, most of them would answer \"No.\"", "336" ], [ "One key similarity I see between the 2 is a politics of resentment, whereby individuals consider themselves unlucky by virtue of the luck of their birth in this society. Which is actually quite true and reasonable, but the *resentment* comes in the idea that all the responsibility for this bad luck comes from other, more powerful people who have agency - i.e. oppressors - and the correct solution to this predicament is to constantly emphasize one's own helplessness and to focus on correcting - or just punishing merely for the sake of the visceral pleasure of revenge - the actions of those powerful people who have agency, rather than focusing on navigating the unfair world with the best of their ability.\n\nObviously one should do both, but it's an issue of focus.\n\n > In both, you have a dynamic that's generated when a lot of people at the margins of society find a network where they can talk to each other and reinforce each other's positions and identities.\n\nI think this probably happens in a lot of places online. I don't know the current consensus in the social sciences, but I heard about a study that showed that if you group people with similar opinions together, you end up with everyone in the group becoming more extreme, rather than, say, everyone in the group landing at some average of that group. Again, it's just 1 study and might fail on replication, but I find it plausible that such a phenomenon might be real and might have happened in those communities. \n\n > The community then secretes into the public consciousness a mixture of legitimate complaints and toxic bitterness, that normies either appropriate or react to, depending on their own partisan leanings.\n\nI think one difference is that SJW communities are really an offshoot of the very powerful and long-running feminist movement, via the \"XXX studies\" and \"critical XXX theory\" lines of studies at university. So in their case, the community doesn't so much secrete onto the popular consciousness as it's actively shot at them with a Super Soaker.", "68" ], [ "It might be you're confused because the parts before the paragraph weren't included. I don't have the transcript on-hand, but the \"lineage\" that <PERSON> is referring to here is the history of racist scientists who *thought* they were using objective science to justify their racism, when in fact they were using pseudoscience to excuse it. He's claiming that <PERSON> & <PERSON> and others like <PERSON> who want to study the issue objectively should have the burden of proof placed on them that their pursuit of objective science isn't actually just (possibly unconscious) cover for excusing racism.\n\nThe following sentence is probably the most confusing from that paragraph:\n\n > Here is why we are at a point, either in American history, or science, or whatever, where we are certain that nobody in 50 years is going to look back at us and say that. \n\nI think what <PERSON> is saying is that the notion that people 50 years in the future won't look back at scientists like <PERSON> & <PERSON> and consider them as pseudoscientific racists, just like we consider the scientists of yesteryear the same, is unjustified. His next sentence:\n\n > Because scientifically what, the scientists who are on my side of this argument, think, and they include <PERSON> and many others, they say that’s where we are here.\n\nis just saying that <PERSON> and other scientists on his side believe that <PERSON> & <PERSON> are on the wrong side of history, so to speak, and that's why they're speaking out on this issue (<PERSON> name drops <PERSON> quite a few times in this conversation, but I don't think <PERSON> himself has publicly endorsed either side or anything else).", "569" ], [ "No, I meant [<PERSON>_). <PERSON> is just a neuroscientist who hasn't done neuroscience in years AFAIK and is mainly a public personality who interviews people and gives talks, whose intersection with the science of IQ and race only comes from his general interest in science and his interest in the unjust demonization of <PERSON> he saw in the <PERSON> incident. <PERSON> is an actual current research psychologist who has experience in intelligence research. During the <PERSON>-<PERSON> exchange, <PERSON> independently submitted a counterpoint to Vox's piece on the <PERSON>-Murray podcast, which <PERSON> refused to publish - it was later [published on Quillette](_URL_0_). \n\nI referenced <PERSON> as an example of an intelligence scientist, along with <PERSON>, that <PERSON> is calling out in that quote. <PERSON> doesn't fit so well because, again, he's not a current practicing scientist, just a public intellectual who talks and learns about stuff from actual current practicing scientists.\n\n > [He has.](_URL_2_)\n\nCould you help me out in what I'm suppose to be seeing in <PERSON>'s Wikipedia page? I couldn't find anything there that showed him commenting on the <PERSON>-Harris affair. There *is* a part about him in relation to <PERSON> and his views on the study of intelligence and race:\n\n > <PERSON>'s 2007 book What Is Intelligence? impressed <PERSON>, a co-author of the book The Bell Curve, who wrote in a statement published on the book's back cover, \"This book is a gold mine of pointers to interesting work, much of which was new to me. All of us who wrestle with the extraordinarily difficult questions about intelligence that <PERSON> discusses are in his debt.\"[6]\n > \n > <PERSON> is transparent about his belief in racial equality in his work, but **he advocates for open scientific debate about controversial social science claims and is critical of the suppression of research into race and intelligence**, where \"courses are taught on The Bell Curve that do not assign the Bell Curve, where courses on intelligence are not offered simply because some student might raise the question of racial differences, where someone taking IQ seriously would be ostracized in an education or gender studies department, where the history of the black family is distorted for political purposes, where scholars rise in wrath when a speaker details obvious ethnic differences\".[7] He only urges those with related beliefs to refrain from advancing them without solid evidence.[8]\n(Bolding mine)\n\nThe bolded part indicates that he would fall squarely on the side of <PERSON>, but if you click on the reference [7], it leads to an [article](_URL_3_) he wrote in the journal *Intelligence* (for which the aforementioned <PERSON> is the editor in chief, interestingly enough) for its March–April 2013 issue, which is 4 years before the whole <PERSON>-Harris affair. So his opinion might have changed since then.", "520" ], [ "Yeah, it's really tiresome. I recall <PERSON> pulling this out during his conversation with <PERSON>, repeating that <PERSON> is doing just fine with a successful career at a renowned think tank, as if that somehow made the behavior of dishonestly smearing him OK.\n\nIt's kinda like shooting someone in the knee, then when after extensive surgery and years of physical therapy they can finally walk and run again, claiming, \"See, I didn't hurt them! They're just fine!\" \n\nPeople like <PERSON> and <PERSON> do a great job of putting a veneer of credibility on it, enough that people are able to convince themselves that it's a sensible argument, as long as it's directed at the correct people. I've personally experienced being pulled into such arguments and allowing them to override my own cognitive dissonance exactly in cases like this, back when I would've agreed with <PERSON> and <PERSON> on basically everything. \n\nI will say, though, this perspective actually does make a lot of sense if you view everything through the lens of power. From such a perspective, there's no concept of principles or honesty, it's just that, as long as the person you're attacking has the power to withstand it, any attacks you throw at them are justified. <PERSON> has power due to the conservative think tank industry that stands behind him - as well as the \"classical liberal\" societal structure that stands behind *that* - and so dishonest smears against him - or even literal physical violence against him, as in the case of Middlebury - are entirely justified.", "495" ], [ "> And the root of the anger is that <PERSON> spends excessive time focusing on black people potentially being genetically dumb while being completely uninterested in centuries of brutal colonialism and slavery, which <PERSON> believes to be orders of magnitude more important in explaining the reality of black America.\n\nI've seen this sort of thing asserted a bunch, but I haven't seen it actually supported with scientific evidence. Sure, it seems <PERSON> believes \"centuries of brutal colonialism and slavery\" to be \"orders of magnitude more important in explaining the reality of black America,\" but as best as I can tell, that's just an article of faith, not something actually supported by empirical evidence. <PERSON> provides plenty of just-so stories that sound intuitively plausible on their faces, but the one thing we know about science - particularly social sciences - is that \"intuitively plausible\" has basically zero correlation with \"true.\" And certainly we can criticize the science of IQ, but at least it's actually *science* backed by actual *empirical research*.", "180" ] ]
458
[ 8232, 8395, 1103, 22757, 15979, 4193, 7963, 11992, 15441, 9139, 13073, 7795, 21166, 18614, 17419, 20761, 2054, 23503, 8365, 18720, 18685, 2521, 14870, 11949, 25541, 6567, 3224, 9191, 6773, 21706, 5802, 2426, 343, 11156, 14986, 18624, 9737, 6986, 2373, 7278, 19683, 13572, 19631, 18554, 18843, 4464, 20073, 710, 15195, 18697, 628, 20159, 530, 6495, 15977, 22365, 16192, 2694, 19823, 15681, 14062, 5684, 13261, 19656, 8118, 1909, 5013, 6398, 18824, 18654, 16628, 16616, 15468, 6198, 18610, 1856, 11700, 22222, 21168, 23002, 16548, 10034, 1756, 5554, 21922, 22485, 3286, 6162, 7439, 19654, 8713, 17974, 4052, 2381, 21124, 8050, 21989, 9703, 678, 14524, 9003, 17790, 23631, 14956, 1731, 11663, 560, 25442, 11260, 5979, 1611, 7160, 12797, 18264, 3962, 3120, 15845, 25225, 17930, 21840, 1406, 23883, 14628, 17053, 23164, 11750, 21532, 15415, 22101, 7466, 22770, 14020, 2849, 22234, 16100, 17040, 20700, 14630, 4106, 15711, 22043, 17812, 24507, 12650, 11237, 13431, 21918, 6596, 22741, 2714, 8248, 346, 11652, 6089, 16887, 16496, 10350, 4199, 19301, 4692, 14111, 4102, 22049, 23444, 4953, 21070, 8544, 23979, 7212, 20745, 19617, 18844, 24673, 7190, 19065, 3090, 2825, 9555, 14726, 24423, 4186, 2898, 18287, 20807, 9899, 18690, 23785, 24023, 5724, 22422, 3864, 9116, 17424, 5450, 11177, 6739, 15099, 6403, 9409, 10005, 19004, 4410, 5663, 23718, 18118, 3200, 14413, 25317, 5653, 22280, 4123, 5209, 14043, 18027, 19918, 20436, 20561, 1095, 6383, 21470, 17769, 4007, 13380, 18638, 20820, 10014, 9440, 2391, 19497, 11748, 21503, 18580, 22296, 10611, 8630, 3736, 449, 25046, 3330, 11883, 20705, 15389, 12174, 4350, 22161, 23655, 17821, 4268, 19763, 544, 13726, 18723, 11950, 9669, 11960, 19745, 768, 9282, 10941, 18323, 20270, 14084, 11094, 17300, 5544, 14449, 14520, 10094, 1256, 4651, 12351, 3900, 9828, 17183, 16463, 13708, 10266, 19405, 5173, 5273, 11711, 102, 20784, 21213, 16077, 16968, 4773, 8430, 12462, 24139, 22964, 1117, 24753, 3816, 10683, 8249, 24962, 5671, 16520, 10851, 3401, 21314, 19900, 2569, 5015, 25371, 17739, 16788, 21231, 4100, 3341, 13093, 16470, 13723, 19186, 12599, 2516, 8959, 18598, 8834, 1974, 4103, 5682, 12899, 17473, 4631, 5670, 4351, 11707, 21293, 21148, 13983, 18752, 22582, 6456, 24127, 22346, 22853, 11968, 23387, 23538, 13168, 12486, 23756, 3698, 17227, 8638, 8386, 17687, 21834, 5576, 11907, 20645, 8712, 2984, 4327, 2102, 22424, 20282, 14786, 15105, 12755, 14751, 10684, 14405, 2598, 5935, 8985, 18067, 20324, 11014, 5893, 12703, 7709, 8711, 7811, 24838, 376, 17170, 21108, 4217, 6314, 15906, 6501, 14116, 15950, 16722, 8719, 19228, 14367, 24340, 13401, 24834, 23653, 25159, 22547, 6482, 22342, 2800, 24731, 5714, 13465, 9228, 23766, 23763, 11548, 8444, 1654, 590, 11580, 19138, 12311, 1789, 20286, 14012, 8729, 15178, 11930, 5870, 18788, 24303, 1472, 16026, 25024, 17533, 3112, 24146, 4055, 1037, 20285, 25388, 4312, 16524, 8836, 1911, 8357, 18206, 8049, 24443, 24720, 18452, 2179, 6543, 12748, 10916, 1587, 15850, 23874, 9383, 2367, 12700, 22794, 10320, 13506, 17895, 24983, 6876, 12051, 5878, 11065, 12926, 16339, 22045, 15133, 12328, 6989, 10782, 20541, 21406, 11460, 13300, 13173, 11393, 11933, 18420, 1973, 20530, 1379, 20787, 2401, 20609, 4457, 3542, 1362, 10415, 14384, 4691, 11173, 25431, 14415, 16378, 16976, 16698, 5109, 16619, 5257, 4348, 21284, 2271 ]
reddit_dump_0898257a76
[ [ "[Fouth generation hiv tests are between 99.8% and 100% accurate based on CDC studies](_URL_0_)\n\n\nThat’s not even the argument that was used against using blood donations from gay people, the original complaint was the increasing costs of testing blood due to more positive tests when carrying out pooling tests of multiple samples at once.\n\n\nYou can’t seriously argue that the NHS should be 100% fine with accepting blood from a straight guy who sleeps around every night while also saying that there needs to be a blanket ban on all gay people donating blood, regardless of if they’ve been married 5 years and that’s their only sexual partner.\n\nEDIT: Replying with \"ackshually if you had sex with a literal prostitute you need to wait 3 months\" isn't the gotcha on monogamous gay men donating blood you think it is.", "65" ], [ "Who said anything about predicting the future? I gave you an article from 2016 citing the exact food issues that were obvious to be caused by leaving the EU at the time. \n\n\n\nIt was painfully obvious in 2016 and the majority of the people saying it was a dumb idea to blindly go into a referendum was stating these exact points:\n\n - Nobody has a unified idea of what the UK wants \n\n\n - Nobody has any fucking clue how to negotiate that\n\n - The UK is smaller than the EU, therefore it's immediately at a disadvantage in trade talks\n\n\n\nBut hey, keep thinking it's predicting the future to work out that leaving a trading union that you get the majority of your food and imports from means you will have shortages in food and goods.\n\nEDIT: Since you love these amazing future predictions so much though\n\n\n _URL_1_\n\n\n_URL_0_\n\n_URL_2_", "564" ], [ "> They are the UK's police of the sea the weapons the have are there because of the dangers they face doing that job. \n\nYea, gotta look out for those French fishermen incase they throw a piece of haddock at ya.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n > Funny how no one had a problem with them having those guns while protecting the French fishermen from illegal fishing from outside the EU. \n\n\"Funny how no one had a problem with protecting from actual illegal fishing activities rather than threatening allies and neighbouring countries\"\n\n\nYou're a lil' bit dense aren't ya?\n\n\nI'm sure the French fishermen are quaking in their boots at a 2 boat presence across the entirety of the UK's waters.", "485" ], [ "Sure.\n\n\n\nThreatening to starve Ireland out if trade agreements couldn't be arranged.\n\nThe month-long circle jerk that all right-wing media in the UK had over the idea of the Royal Navy invading Spain to protect Gibraltar.\n\n\nComparing the EU to the USSR (<PERSON>)\n\nComparing the EU to <PERSON> and <PERSON> (<PERSON>)\n\n[Or how about turning away, literally disrespecting the entire institution of the EU Parliament?](_URL_0_)\n\nWant me to go on?", "437" ], [ "> Have you had gay sex in the last 3 months? No? Okay we will take your blood because there's no risk of hiv to transfer\n\n\nYou do realise that HIV can spread in many ways that isn't through gay sex, right? Straight people can get aids, asexual people can get aids, it's not a gay only thing.\n\n\n > Why was this change even necessary when it literally exists as a precaution to not spread disease...\n\nMaybe learn why this change was necessary and why it was implemented before just looking dumb", "65" ], [ "_URL_0_\n\nHere's the NHS blood donation requirements.\n\nYou could go out, have anal sex with a stranger and then go right out to donate blood with no issues at all. \n\n\nA gay man, living in a monogamous relationship where their husband is their only partner, using condoms and any form of contraceptive protection from STD's would still be banned from donating blood unless they didn't have sex for three months.\n\n\nRegardless of what you think - That clearly doesn't make any sense other that homophobia. You can have a risky straight person allowed to donate blood but a safe gay person banned.", "640" ], [ "Which also makes zero sense, your blood isn't permanently turned into some black slurry if you were paid for sex once when you were 20 and you're now 40.\n\n\nThe rules they set are so painfully contradictory there's literally no defense of them.\n\nPerson A is gay, has had sex once his entire life and it was with their husband. They are banned from donating blood for 3 months under old rules.\n\nPerson B is a 60 year old woman who was a prostitute when she was 20. She's banned from donating blood forever.\n\n\nPerson C goes out around town on a Saturday night before his Monday blood donation sleeping with any girl he fancies. He's able to donate blood normally and without any issues.\n\n\n[61% of respondents admitted that they'd ignore the restrictions anyway, meaning they're essentially useless and only serve to make people not admit to **potentially** risky behaviour that could be used to screen further](_URL_0_).\n\n\nWhy admit you were a prostitute 30 years ago if it'd block you from donating blood for no reason? Why not 29? 28? It'll get slid down by people who are deciding based on their own feelings instead of the science making it far riskier than if the NHS said \"No people who have acted as prostitutes for the last 3 months\" would ever be.", "772" ], [ "You're right, he's just lying and hoping he doesn't get called out. They specifically ask if you're a man who has had sex with another man when you give blood, it has nothing to do with anal and even applies to oral sex with a man despite there being almost no evidence that oral sex can even spread HIV without both people involved having massive open sores in their mouth and on their penis.", "65" ], [ "Kids don't exist in a habitat completely separated and isolated from the other age groups. \n\n\nUni students went back in the UK leading to a spike of Uni student cases, leading to a spike in cases of people in the local areas leading to a nationwide spike in cases in all age groups because Uni students spread the infection.", "110" ], [ "Except the rules put in place have literally nothing to do with health, why can a straight guy who sleeps around with literally any girl who gives him a second glance donate blood freely while a guy in a monogamous relationship with only 1 sexual partner can't? There's a vastly higher chance of getting HIV from the straight guy than the gay guy.", "418" ], [ "[Go tell the NHS that then](_URL_0_)\n\n\nAnal sex is only mentioned twice on the entire page, first for men who have sex with men (even including Oral despite it posing almost no HIV transmission risk) and the second is for women who've had sex with a man who has had anal sex.\n\n\nNothing stops a woman from having anal sex with strangers all night and then donating blood. I guess women's arseholes are magical and able to prevent HIV from entering?", "65" ], [ "No you don't lmao, how are you failing to understand this.\n\n\nPerson A has sex with women he meets at a pub on a night out every single week without a condom.\n\nPerson B is gay and has only had sex with their husband while using a condom and nobody else.\n\nPerson A is objectively more at risk of spreading HIV, Person B isn't gonna magically develop HIV by virtue of him just being gay. Why should person B be banned from donating blood when Person A is far riskier?", "65" ], [ "> How many people do you think are regularly out here having heterosexual sexual contact with 9 people in a night to begin with?\n\n\nWhy does it matter? Why is one group of people allowed while another isn't.\n\n\n > If you turn round and say that you just had a 9 person orgy and you're unsure whether all of them were \"safe\", then you will not be allowed to donate.\n\nAnd if the people in the 9 person orgy were all your friends and female? All good then.\n\nIf the other 8 people at the orgy were friends and guys? The horror! Now you must have aids!\n\n\nYou've got such little clue what you're talking about it's actually adorable.\n\n\nTell ya what, I'll try make it bold this time since you've got such issues reading.\n\n\n\n***Tell me why it's acceptable for a straight guy to sleep around without any protection and be fine to donate blood but a gay guy having sex once with a condom is a limiting factor?***", "442" ], [ "> Person B is imaginary. In real life there’s 10,000 Person Bs and if some of their partners cheat they will be at a higher risk of HIV than 10,000 Person As. \n\nCheating isn't a gay only thing, not sure if you knew that one.\n\n\n\n\n > unless you have absolute proof that you and your partner aren’t cheating. In real life we don’t have that.\n\nSo, like I've already said: Where's the proof that a husband isn't cheating on their wife and spreading HIV? Why isn't the wife banned from donating blood because their husband could have cheated on them and passed HIV to them?\n\nOr what if the Husband is a drug addict? He could catch HIV from sharing needles, therefore the wife must also be banned too right?\n\n\n\nPerson A's HIV risk isn't lower, why are you just lying? Do you not realise that vaginal sex is still capable of passing on HIV?", "65" ], [ "> Most HIV diagnoses in this country are gay men.\n\nLie.\n\n\n40% HIV diagnosis were from gay ***and bisexual*** men [and the rate of infection is at a decades low rate](_URL_0_)\n\n\n > Straight men have a very low rate of having HIV. Therefore a man who has anal sex with a man has a high chance of catching it.\n\n\nThe chance of catching HIV by having insertive anal sex with a man is the same comparable to both receptive and insertive vaginal sex.\n\n\nYou can't complain about the risk of a man getting HIV while ignoring all risk factors that reduce the chance of them having HIV massively while ignoring the fact that the risk is roughly the same for women and if you're gonna use the \"what if their partner cheats\" argument on gay people you need to apply it to everyone.\n\n\nBlack people are also disproportionately represented in HIV diagnosis too, I'm guessing you'll be calling for a ban on all black people donating blood soon as well I presume?", "65" ], [ "> MSM make up > 5% of the population but > 50% new and > 70% historical HIV diagnosis.\n\n\n40%*\n\n\n \n\n > There isn’t any. If her husband cheats with a woman her risk is still very low. How is that so hard to grasp?\n\n\n\n\nThe risk to the woman is almost exactly the same as it is for insertive anal sex with a HIV positive man. Stop lying lmao\n\n\n\n > SHE WOULD BE\n\n > That’s the whole fucking point\n\n\n\n****Not if the wife doesn't know about it, your whole basis for your argument of why gay people should be banned even if they're in a monogamous relationship because \"hurr durr they might cheat****", "65" ], [ "> Again; this is a lie, as per your own source. You are a liar. \n\nAlready addressed, learn to read.\n\n\n > You’ve been linked the cdc stats showing you are wrong. Calling me a liar won’t make it true. \n\nThe CDC didn't say anything of the sort lmao, I provided a link to the actual CDC study that lists the risk of infection per act from an infected source.", "76" ], [ "> Who the hell wants to go to school for four years to be a police officer?\n\nSomeone who wants to earn a six figure salary?\n\n\nLess Police isn't a bad thing, put more funding into mental health support and don't use Police as a catch all \"deal with this person\" role.\n\nSomeone threatening to commit suicide? Why not send someone who is trained in talking someone down from suicide instead of a random cop?", "582" ], [ "> ***between*** 99.8% and 100%\n\n\nNothing medical is foolproof, you shouldn't be having any blood transfusions, surgery or medical care at any time if any risk is unacceptable to you.\n\n\n99.8% effectiveness is also for positive samples, meaning you'd need to have a million HIV positive people donate blood before you'd have the risk of 200 possible failures. As there's barely a 10th of that population living with HIV in the UK, i'd say we're pretty safe", "65" ], [ "Then why do you say nothing when a bank gets a tax cut that single handedly reduces its tax obligation by billions, despite ever increasing profit margins?\n\n\nWhy do Republicans only get angry about the idea of the Government giving money to people when it’s not in the form of a bailout or subsidy to large companies?\n\n\nAgain: Why should I have to pay off a banks financial obligations. They took a loan, just pay it back. Not that hard, right? Why do Banks have the ability to get occasional bailouts but the idea of doing something that’s already easily possible makes everyone here meltdown at the prospect", "499" ], [ "That’s not what I’m asking though.\n\n\nWhy would exactly 0 Republicans turn up their noses if a bank needed a bailout tomorrow and yet student loan forgiveness is a foreign concept despite the fact that one obviously benefits average citizens a lot more than the other.\n\n\n\nThis pandemic has shown pretty clearly that all the magic money trees and “we can’t possible afford that” goes out the window instantly when politicians want to.\n\n\n\n\nCan you give an actual reason why not besides “they got a loan, therefore they need to pay it back” since I’ve shown that taking out a loan means fucking nothing for any other group of people if they have issues with repayment?", "499" ], [ "Except an end to bail outs would lead to a run on the banks on 2008 and mass defaults, your economy is now dead for the foreseeable future.\n\n\nBailouts aren’t a bad and spooky thing, they happen literally all the time. The bad part is that for some reason Americans who would directly benefit from the help it would give them will argue against it while billionaires will happily accept the tax cuts \n\n\n2% of the annual US military budget could end homelessness in the US (estimated around $20 billion)\n\n\nWhich would benefit you more? An unnoticeable 2% increase in the US military spending or literally everyone in the US able to live in housing?\n\n\n<PERSON> gets millions written off his taxes by claiming that all his businesses are unprofitable but the idea of a college student having 50k of Federal student loan debt cancelled by the federal government (something they could literally do tomorrow if they chose to) is too far?\n\n\nYou do you man, you’ve gotta stop acting like a temporarily embarrassed-millionaire who’s down on their luck and who is gonna make it big one day and realise that you also deserve your share of the cake, rather than letting the cake be siphoned off to the Maldives to escape Us taxes", "264" ], [ "And like I ***literally*** just said, it only applies if they try to charge you with drug dealing. If it’s clearly for personal use and you’re an addict consuming the drug regularly then you’ll face a fine at most. Find a personal drug user in Portugal charged with drug dealing because they have more than 10 days worth of a drug at a time where it was blatant that they’d been only using it themselves \n\n\n\n\n\nAnd no, you keep repeating it but it’s not forced rehab. Read your own quotes from the law.\n\n\nIf you have 3 days worth of Heroin then no crime has been committed, if you’ve got a months worth of heroin *and* it’s clearly for personal use then the court suspends all sentencing if you go to rehab. That’s a fraction of all drug users, the vast majority of drug arrests are for small personal amounts of a few grams at a time.\n\n\n\nDude, just learn what you’re talking about rather than just quoting headlines. Drugs are decriminalised in Portugal, nobody said they were fully legal. No shit if you’re a drug dealer you can still be arrested for selling drugs.", "615" ], [ "Literally when did I say it would be the child's fault.\n\n\nFuck me, 3 replies with the same fucking response. Have none of you ever heard of survivor guilt? People blame themselves after surviving or going through traumatic experiences that were 100% out of their control because \"Why did I survive when X didn't\" or \"If I did Y differently then X wouldn't have happened\".\n\n\nEither quote where I said it was the child's fault or stop tring to put words in my mouth because you're incapable of accepting that a kid would probably blame themself if they spread Covid to a family member and they later died.\n\n\nFuck, if I spread Covid to my girlfriend's mum who's going through Chemo i'd feel fucking awful about it. You might wanna go study up on how emotions work if you can't understand that.", "335" ], [ "I don't think it's that far apart but if i'm wrong i'm more than happy to be corrected.\n\n\n\nEngland is more densely connected to the world too, Heathrow was probably a huge source of early Covid spread to the UK whereas Scotland doesn't have any airports of the same size that deal with the same qualitity and distance of international flights \n\n\nNot to say the UK government didn't fuck up Covid OFC, they did fucking terrible.", "852" ], [ "Mind naming some examples of US military interventions that began with an invasion force of 20 trucks and no jet/tank support and then (after entering the country <PERSON> apparently wants to start a war with) waited for several days for no apparent reason?\n\nLike, literally any?\n\nA single one?\n\n\n\nThe US already operates military bases in Syria and has drones capable of flying more than 300 miles at once (since they've got neighbouring allies). They don't need to setup any of that stuff, it already exists and if it didn't it wouldn't come in the form of 20 trucks with no wider military support.\n\n[<PERSON> left hundreds of soldiers in Eastern Syria back in 2019](_URL_2_) and [they already operate military bases there](_URL_0_) \n\n[The Syrian Government even complained about the fact that the US has military bases in Syria](_URL_1_)\n\nYou're not making any sense lmao.", "819" ], [ "> He's investing more into the middle east, regardless of what exactly is in those trucks\n\nSupport and logistics assets, the same thing the US has been continually doing when they support local groups in Syria that claim to be the actual Government. If you're outraged about that then you should have been outraged for the past 50 years.\n\n\n\n > If it's not anything against the Trumpian policy of leaving the middle east, why the suspicious timing of being right after the inauguration?\n\nLeaving the middle east....and leaving hundreds of soldiers behind in Syria alone? Haha, what? How can he want to leave the Middle East and also leave a military base open and also leave soldiers stationed around oil fields in Eastern Syria? Literally makes 0 sense \n\n > We know the general staff did not cooperate with <PERSON>'s policy. If they had plans to re-engage then right after the inauguration is when it would begin.\n\n\nAnd they've what? Invaded Syria despite already having assets in the area that they could use more easily? If you was complaining about <PERSON> moving thousands of tanks across Jorden towards Syria maybe I'd see your point. But a 20 truck convoy carrying supplies into a rebel-held area in the Middle East to give them supplies isn't WW3 in American foreign policy. If they wanted to invade Syria why is there 0 movement at all at any of the other bases that would be clear launching off points for an invasion/attack?\n\n\n\n\n\n > Someone terrorist is going to take a crack at american convoys eventually, and then what? Peacefully give up on whatever operation is in progress?\n\nWhereas they're incapable of doing the same with the hundreds of soldiers that <PERSON> left in Syria? They're all just magical and etherial and incapable of being shot by terrorists?", "819" ], [ "You do realise price isn't a 1:1 correlation with quantity, right? \n\nMeth in some countries costs a lot less than in other countries. New Zealand and Australia have extremely strict drug checks on incoming packages, therefore Meth is either produced in Australia or is expensive.\n\n\nMeanwhile, the EU has a mainland connection to all of Asia and Africa. Totally comparable lmao", "79" ], [ "> The United States should not be interfering with the politics of other states. If the Syrians want a civil war that's for them to sort out. Everything the US touches in that cursed place turns to shit.\n\nAnd when Al Quada v2 comes up threatening the US? Just let them accrue power in the Middle East until they're actually capable of threatening the US and then doing something?\n\n\n > Then they're maintainance or escalation. Both are bad. \n\n\nMaintainance that's been ongoing since the Middle East has been noticed by colonial powers. Again, would you rather enemies accrue power in the Middle East until it destabilises to the point of threatening the US?\n\n\n > The US doesn't have a history of trying to control and puppet Middle Eastern dictators right? Why would I be concerned about what the US is wanting to do in the mid-East? 😂\n\nYea, i'm sure the main invasion force is coming from 20 trucks when hundreds of soldiers were already there. Ya found them out", "819" ], [ "No. Read my original text, I specifically asked for an example of an athlete who clearly transitioned for an advantage. Here, i'll help you.\n\n\n - \"Got some examples of any athletes changing their genders to get an advantage?\"\n\n\nSee, crazy what reading can get ya.\n\n\nThe Athlete you originally mentioned, <PERSON>, is apparently such a liar that they've kept up their lie (just for winning the athlete awards, totally no other reason despite her being on testosterone suppressants for a year and therefore having 0 advantage over a female athlete) for another 4 years.\n\n\n > <PERSON>\n\n\nThe one who has been on Estrogen for almost 6 years now? That one? \n\n\nBuddy, after 6 years you're not gonna be as strong as the equivilant guy. Muscle mass decreases\n\n\nOr are you gonna be incapable of reading what I wrote and you're just hearing what you want me to say rather than what I'm actually saying because you realise you've got 0 argument", "253" ], [ "> If you insist on being comparable, look at your chart. The biggest pie is SEA, with combined population of 650mil. 10 times the population, yet only 2 times the market value.\n\n\nAgain: Meth is more expensive in some places than others, some countries consume more meth (especially poorer countries). You're comparing apples to oranges because you forgot that drugs aren't equal prices worldwide.\n\n\nThe EU paper you linked literally talks about EU smuggling to Australia, the price rises 7-10x from the cheapest EU country to Australia.", "841" ], [ "> According to the report\n\n\nAh, cool. Let's see who this report is from.\n\n - Syrian state news agency SANA reports\n\nAh, cool. Let's see who they are.\n\n[Oh look, they're a <PERSON> paper who it would be directly advantagous for to paint a picture of the US helping anti-Government rebels](_URL_0_). What a surprise.\n\n\n\n\n\nThe only one who's gonna be coping is you for the next 8 years :)", "0" ], [ "Literally when did I say the convoy didn’t exist. I said that the claims of helicopters that have 0 evidence of existing outside of random unnamed Syrian locals that a Syrian propaganda news station spoke to. No photos like the rest of the convoy, no flight tracking data showing any US military ariel movements \n\n\nCope", "226" ], [ "Lmao, I don’t support <PERSON> at all. He’s gonna be a warmonger like every single US president of the last century. The difference is that I’m not gonna cry and pretend it’s WW3 because 20 trucks carrying supplies entered a rebel held place in Syria, just like they’ve done for decades", "308" ], [ "Ya, it does. Literally all presidents, regardless of party are scum that only support what’s politically viable to support with their own agendas added.\n\n\nThe difference is I don’t pretend like it’s only Democrats who couldn’t give less of a fuck about the average person\n\n\nYou are capable of processing that, right? That someone can simultaneous not support the Democrats and the Republicans? Or is that too foreign of a concept for you to understand? \n\n\nNot gonna bother replying more, DM me if you’d like to complain about things as consistent as the sky being blue some more. 10 minute delays between comments is too much effort for such shitty arguments", "313" ], [ "> Depression is a physiological state, and no matter what substance you take, that physiological state will still be present unless you change the lifestyle factor that's preventing you from being healthy/happy\n\nI suffered from self harm and depression for years before I started taking anti depressants last year, they massively helped. Why would an anti depressant help someone suffering from depression while a psychadelic can't? \n\nThere are 100% chemical causes within the body that cause depression, that's the whole point of anti depressants", "739" ], [ "> But those chemical causes are not random or arbitrary, they're a result of your body not having the resources to produce an optimal chemical state. \n\nWhich is exactly what anti depressants do\n\n\n > For example certain B vitamins are involved in creating the precursors for serotonin (the brain chemical that SSRIs interact with), and those B vitamins are \"activated\" (via a process called phosphorylation) in the liver using minerals like zinc\n\n\nAnd what happens when the root cause of the depression is because the brain is reuptaking serotonin too strongly? Literally no amount of pumping your body full of Iron or vitamin B is going to help you, literally the only help that could be offered is an SSRI to increase the effectiveness of the Serotonin already inside your body.\n\n\n\n > and instead of solving something in a year it turns into a life-long battle of hopping from drug to drug.\n\nAnd what happens to those people who don't \"solve it in a year\" and instead end up ending their own life? Studies have shown the effectiveness of SSRI's, without them I probably wouldn't be here now.\n\n\n\n\n > I think the best things people can do are to eat intuitive, balanced meals they enjoy (balances of carbs/protein/fat that feels good, even at breakfast; so not just toast/cereal) and to go out walking/jogging (walk a bit then run slowly then walk again) every other day. Doing that can cover a multitude of sins and help people return to a state in which neurochemicals and hormonal profile is healthier.\n\nSorry, but anyone who's been through depression knows this advice is trash. Eating healthy and going for a walk isn't gonna stop someone wanting to end their own life and cutting themself.\n\n\nDepression isn't being sad that you can fix by just going for a quick walk, it's not showering for a week because you can't be bothered to get out of bed, it's wishing you were dead because you're just a burden on everyone else, it's not wanting to leave your house for any reason because being out in public feels massively uncomfortable.\n\n\nA walk doesn't fix that.", "739" ], [ "If only <PERSON> had his own website, Twitter account and press releases where he could submit evidence of fraud rather than just stringing along idiots by making unsubstantiated claims.\n\n\nOh wait, he does.\n\nI'd love to know how Google would prevent <PERSON> from holding a White House press briefing and laying out all evidence of fraud in the 2020 elections. I wonder why he's too afraid to do so?", "452" ], [ "> ecause your side censored discussion of the topic\n\nBy \"my side\" you mean Google, saying that you can't post conspiracy theories on YouTube? \n\nI get that you've got a pretty poor understanding of how the internet works but Google isn't the controller of all the internet, you can still post things online if Google doesn't want you to.\n\n\n > The trouble is, we can't have that debate anymore because Google has censored it.\n\n\nWe're having this debate right now, wtf are you talking about.\n\n\nAgain: Why are <PERSON>'s lawyers too afraid to claim it was fraud like the President has frequently claimed the trials are about?", "106" ], [ "> By \"your side\" I mean every major U.S. corporation. Your side is Wall Street, Hollywood, Silicon Valley, academia, the deep state, all the institutions of real power. Your side is The Cathedral.\n\n\nDamn, all US corporations have decided that they're gonna join my side and start treating their workers fairly with fair compensation and strong worker rights? Glad to hear it.\n\n\nOh wait, you don't realise that the only two options aren't \"Democrat\" or \"Republican\". \n\n\n > No we're not, because that requires both sides. All we've got is your side.\n\n\nThe other side is <PERSON>'s lawyers, are you seriously claiming that they're unable to claim there was fraud despite the fact that Google has literally nothing to do with a court procedure?\n\n\nAgain: ***Why has <PERSON> claimed he has evidence of fraud and then not provided any of the evidence?*** You can't cry and blame Google when <PERSON> claimed he had evidence of fraud a month ago and still hasn't had a single lawyer present their evidence in court.", "23" ], [ "> Scroll through the comments here and see how many times your side is making that exact argument.\n\n\nHow poor is your understanding of politics if you think everyone who thinks <PERSON> is an idiot who is baselessly claiming fraud is on the same side?\n\n\nYou're the poster child of the reason people want a test to be carried out before someone votes.\n\n\n\n\n > That's right, because the only two options are actually the rebels or The Cathedral.\n\n\nWhat the fuck are you talking about?\n\n\n\n\n\nFor the third fucking time:\n\n\n***Why hasn't <PERSON> offered evidence in the over a month since he lost the election of any type of fraud?***", "210" ], [ "> But sir, we just fined Facebook last month. \n\nOh, I'll have to tell the Police next time I get a fine for speeding that they actually can't fine me again because I already have a fine from last month.\n\n\n > Fine them for what? For breaking some law, who cares?\n\n\nIf only these laws had been on the books since 2009 with it being pretty clear you need to ask a user's consent before adding cookies to a user's browser. \n\n\nOr was 11 years not enough for Google to stop breaking the law?\n\n\nI'd love to know the reality you live in where a modern country's budget defecit is settled by a $100 million fine. It's literally 1/300th the amount of money that France pays on it interest alone for 2019.", "99" ], [ "That's kinda what my experience with mental health services was too. \n\n\n\nI didn't have any reason for feeling depressed itself and I hate talking to strangers so I made it pretty clear i'd prefer being prescribed something rather than going to counselling when there isn't (as far as I can tell) any underlying cause.\n\nMy girlfriend ended up going through the same process, getting ignored my GP's who only gave scribbled down phone numbers for unrelated services (Such as being given an alcohol addiction helpline number despite not mentioning alcohol abuse once).\n\n\n\nMental health gets a lot of talk and media attention but I don't know anyone who's been through the process of seeking mental health support who has actually felt happy with the process.\n\n\nI haven't heard anything about Covid directly causing Covid although I suppose it's not surprising when people are self-isolating and being sick with little to no human contact is pretty depressing in and of itself.\n\n\nHope you feel better soon anyway!", "739" ], [ "Eh, kinda depends. $2.50 from each passenger ticket goes towards the TSA so if they removed the TSA they'd also presumably remove the ticket fee.\n\n[It would technically reduce the deficit by ~$7.9 billion ](_URL_0_) if the TSA just suddenly ceased to exist overnight, in reality it'd be less though since the full ~$7.9 billion doesn't all come from normal tax revenue.", "780" ], [ "Again: The EU and Europe are different. European import laws aren't a concept, not all countries are EU members. The EU decides the import and export tariffs for EU members, nobody else.\n\n\nAndorra, Armenia, Belarus, Iceland, Georgia, Armenia, etc are all in Europe, none of them are EU members. Being a European nation isn't even a requirement to be in the EU, there have been frequent discussions about future expansion into Northern African countries and how politically viable it'd be.", "437" ] ]
180
[ 4025, 6611, 3404, 15554, 19395, 18463, 11925, 10487, 3986, 12845, 23016, 10768, 13405, 13328, 15206, 14689, 25492, 4726, 14191, 22773, 5149, 12195, 9224, 18571, 19005, 17823, 5222, 3392, 16482, 4189, 7849, 12824, 15720, 11959, 5130, 13915, 3042, 17476, 9649, 1045, 9010, 25544, 4639, 12818, 3979, 24387, 24441, 10665, 3274, 5728, 16013, 8, 3537, 23616, 13722, 21295, 10042, 3345, 10092, 1604, 19760, 14712, 12934, 13105, 20638, 24406, 22744, 23795, 19951, 8552, 2321, 9208, 18728, 22034, 6569, 22102, 6675, 4588, 13765, 8183, 4838, 5322, 11794, 1700, 11965, 4243, 16390, 6122, 24729, 13519, 5461, 13471, 3226, 17752, 7386, 10152, 12579, 19551, 14685, 15464, 20210, 8899, 4673, 12846, 22098, 19253, 24699, 15034, 4704, 17917, 4675, 11315, 11484, 11395, 681, 13352, 23949, 2538, 11355, 5001, 5098, 18005, 1588, 764, 12223, 17220, 12819, 16547, 23812, 13413, 18605, 14128, 10629, 22062, 1932, 7108, 18091, 22841, 2487, 13351, 16798, 15726, 13662, 22242, 11321, 3131, 13850, 13092, 2078, 5672, 25468, 21619, 24204, 23878, 12750, 23252, 998, 2917, 19348, 17714, 8679, 23588, 24293, 17949, 5430, 8236, 9889, 2690, 10329, 8777, 14377, 14697, 5713, 4540, 8391, 23813, 16050, 12214, 18927, 17172, 17186, 5543, 150, 17179, 5608, 18349, 12251, 6790, 8281, 4154, 17007, 14271, 6187, 1062, 12702, 715, 8045, 23456, 3390, 13557, 3502, 14162, 12809, 1819, 22036, 4961, 10630, 18165, 14897, 10593, 22830, 15085, 6219, 13498, 11665, 12537, 15645, 5191, 20828, 15477, 4942, 12479, 10450, 5844, 10027, 16267, 7393, 9693, 2880, 5466, 10780, 8110, 6438, 1510, 14474, 24234, 11498, 17048, 7034, 11809, 25094, 6652, 13834, 14392, 10829, 9512, 15890, 9672, 4389, 20178, 8628, 8116, 7535, 2131, 4248, 2230, 11409, 12017, 1827, 5966, 11564, 13284, 4366, 10957, 5492, 8158, 8533, 11834, 13725, 10040, 1245, 25125, 12349, 2851, 22254, 9362, 3240, 22908, 4897, 10298, 21543, 762, 24335, 18820, 3316, 23291, 10236, 14891, 5987, 14261, 3, 16208, 3172, 5494, 24074, 19850, 16007, 24748, 15102, 11805, 2403, 12402, 7244, 505, 24056, 3987, 18539, 16433, 4848, 20613, 15658, 12820, 15545, 13675, 7551, 17052, 2970, 831, 8256, 7125, 2923, 5088, 22155, 4896, 12107, 3653, 14896, 22370, 16138, 23700, 14087, 13987, 8180, 13148, 4647, 733, 2093, 18754, 5651, 205, 9475, 20858, 22648, 456, 7548, 4812, 5354, 13428, 15335, 4170, 9323, 15164, 7671, 10429, 14789, 23115, 1799, 7716, 7467, 16601, 6388, 23454, 14906, 4309, 16003, 10328, 1383, 2566, 5141, 9124, 4799, 14659, 12097, 20106, 8243, 2134, 25423, 20726, 25296, 1503, 12546, 2663, 3413, 7630, 16802, 19916, 10579, 3416, 14118, 8216, 9717, 7516, 10244, 6266, 20191, 15152, 22996, 3344, 11281, 11781, 21363, 5792, 23914, 2820, 4618, 15367, 11444, 6023, 9409, 6680, 18455, 7042, 24625, 23088, 4192, 22498, 8379, 7985, 11513, 19641, 21832, 9484, 6741, 11688, 13419, 1126, 5185, 18982, 1343, 1240, 13979, 12465, 21582, 6948, 1709, 5920, 4529, 4105, 6907, 751, 11556, 2233, 18231, 24122, 21252, 18951, 21908, 12841, 773, 1185, 12913, 22861, 3096, 3257, 8508, 2550, 25276, 16148, 122, 6975, 8514, 17131, 14683, 5661, 24243, 7079, 13749, 1410, 4684, 1652, 12999, 5390, 18175, 1884, 22944, 16613, 8540, 16258, 4779, 1954, 2890, 25347, 23407, 21564, 21183, 5425, 5037, 16033, 14316, 2240, 10161, 7930, 22028, 25447, 12872, 15255, 12043, 6604, 17493 ]
reddit_dump_098765432112
[ [ "It's actually really interesting watching the press briefings. The reasons they are pulling ratings are because they are actually REAL now. Reporters are grilling <PERSON> and it's not the same old stale 5 talking points reporters asking generic soft balls with the one token Fox guy asking a few real questions. They have video questions, and letting smaller outlets show that they are relevant, and really, they are a real wild card in the future because they aren't the establishment and have nothing to lose and everything to gain from creating the new path as the others struggle to adapt. \n\nThe reporters look like they are enjoying their jobs for the first time in a decade and now there is actual competition starting to take place beyond just ratings, but integrity. They've added a new dimension and it's really fascinating to watch unfold a completely new dynamic. I think either side of the fence you sit on, you have to admit that at least.", "6" ], [ "This is the one I understand the least. I can understand the rest of their talking points being based in a naive compassion like a child that you have to explain to why you can't afford to go feed every homeless person we see, but we help the ones we can, when we can. The child is being altruistic, there's no problem there, he/she just doesn't understand why we can't afford to. They offer their own toy, and convince their sibling to give up one of theirs too... we can all sacrifice. It's sweet, it's just not realistic. I love my liberal friends to death, I just wish we could have a rational conversation about it.", "974" ], [ "Since he deleted his comment he said: \n\n\n > Ok....Anyone that opposes <PERSON> ends up dead or in jail on bogus charges ruling them ineligible to oppose him. Sounds like a free democracy to me🙄SM\n\n\n\n\n\nIt doesn't impact the United States any more than any past administration is dealing with. I mean, let's do that same thing with Saudi Arabia and Iran. Are they better or worse than <PERSON>? Everyone is cool with us being frenemies with them... so they must be better than Russia? Right? Those countries would never do anything worse? The left must be outraged! Right? (they're not)", "853" ], [ "Not just reddit, it's the entirety of media. TV shows affect how people interact. It goes deep. 6-7 minute intervals of conversation. What people see on TV they think is \"normal\".. they are creating the norms and creating characters for people to relate to. Once a character is relatable they can shift the character through emotional series of interactions in time into a completely different person and get to control where they go. The psychological implications of this shouldn't be underestimated and I think any reasonable psychologist would agree that a popular move/show/book can heavily impact a person's psychology. This is why these things are historically popular, because they have a very heavy impact on humanity as a whole and shaping it. A very interesting phenomenon, and not one to look at through completely rose colored lenses.", "367" ], [ "Seriously, they are violently attacking peaceful people that are simply trying to voice their opinions. The guy at the airport fled for his life and still got beat while some freaky man child is screaming like he just won the superbowl by taking a guy down in 20 on 1 mob violence. How much of a pussy do you have to be to cheer for that type of shit, to think that's some kind of accomplishment. It's getting really old really fast.", "669" ], [ "Hilarious part is they can't take either position now without agreeing with someone on <PERSON>'s team. <PERSON> said he wouldn't use it, <PERSON> says he is with <PERSON> even though he thinks it works and <PERSON> claimed they used it on the guy they got the information from to carry out the <PERSON> raid... then he delivers this report to expose it all. This is going to have them chasing their own tail for a week.", "452" ], [ "LOL what? The <PERSON> admin lied and covered up every scandal for everyone while they threw the underlings under the bus every step of the way. Executive privilege protections for fast and furious... <PERSON> taking the 5th... more executive privilege for Benghazi. The blatant lies about benghazi. Tell me you guys aren't completely blind to the fact that your own side is pretty corrupt itself... meanwhile you are contemplating \"what ifs\" because you have absolutely nothing else.", "693" ], [ "It was a response to someone who was being interviewed that made the claim that <PERSON> was worse than <PERSON> on <PERSON> (if i remember correctly). This was a quick bullet point <PERSON> went through to illustrate how ridiculous it was to compare the two. And regardless of your beliefs, that type of vile hyperbolic rhetoric would be laughably absurd if the guy was joking, but he kept insisting he was serious. \n\n\n<PERSON> destroyed any credibility that guy had left, tbh.", "182" ], [ "But that gets into other issues on how to create a society. When murder happens, is it eye for an eye? With no state, naturally, some group will always try to attain control and power. That's a historical permanent that seems to be embedded in many humans, and there's billions. Who controls the borders? Or do we have no borders? Who protects the cities from invaders? Who protects you from foreign states that want to invade to take our resources and women? \n\n\nI'm trying to figure out how anyone thinks anarchism is a viable system, and so far I just don't see it, though I'm open to understanding. Capitalism isn't perfect, but nothing is, and so far it's the best imperfect system we've found.", "101" ], [ "If he does nothing other than take down the pedo network from top to bottom it will be worth everything else. People who harm children are the lowest of the low. Rational people instinctively want to protect children even when they don't have any of their own. These sick fucks are no longer human. I've no idea how they got to that point, and frankly I don't give a shit. They need to be stopped, and fortunately the ever growing list of raids is very encouraging. Drain the swamp!", "94" ], [ "That's why they are celebrating so hard and take this as such a big win. The media knows that truth isn't on their side and all they have is brainwashing. They are celebrating \"winning\". They aren't celebrating exposing anything, because they haven't exposed anything. Their goal is to spin anything and everything to take down <PERSON> and anyone in his admin. They are celebrating a successful brain washing Psy Op. It's sedition if someone can find hard evidence of collusion, even though it seems obvious to anyone with a working brain.", "827" ], [ "It's far beyond that. Twitter has extreme data metrics... you can look it up but they know a lot about you by cookies stored from ad sites and what you follow, like, and comment on. Seriously, when I saw extreme, I mean a vast volume. I believe you can even look at some of them yourself. But, I am guessing they have created algorithms that push up the \"verified\" accounts, especially those that carry higher data points in certain metrics... like left leaning/liberal/democrat. \n\n\nHere's the latest on their censorship moves.\n\n_URL_0_", "106" ], [ "Doesn't even matter either way. There's no way anyone could try to claim there's an expectation to privacy in a classroom. It's only illegal to record people unknowingly if there is an expectation to privacy, as far as I can tell, in most states anyways. I'm sure a few states have weird laws regarding this, but I think that's almost universally true, if not completely universally true.", "607" ], [ "They could try, but any decent lawyer would pose the question... so if a person confesses to a misdemeanor in class and somebody recorded it, would it be legally admissible in court? Because it's illegal to record anyone where there is an expectation to privacy in california without their consent UNLESS they in the act of committing or conspiring to commit a felony. I don't know that any judge wouldn't want to blur the lines that much and it'd probably end up moving to higher courts on appeal if they did.", "260" ], [ "Considering <PERSON> was the only other viable option after she colluded with MSM, the DNC, and dictatorships in 3rd world countries and all the big banks and wall street to *steal the election from <PERSON>*, it's a valid point as <PERSON> was the only other option lest we be left with her corrupt ass... it's a completely legitimate argument. Nothing would have been worse than <PERSON>. She belongs behind bars.", "557" ], [ "See, but that's the thing. If the evidence is a paperclip vs a bowling ball it should speak for itself and you shouldn't fear people telling their side, because like you just said, it should be obvious the weight of evidence lies the majority to your favor. The fact of the matter is you think you are smarter than everyone else so if they disagree with you they are simply wrong in your mind. So you'd just prefer the other side doesn't get to speak because you are afraid they might end up disagreeing with you if the other side gets a voice. That's the problem. You aren't into real journalism. You are into activism. You want journalists to promote your ideology while silencing the other side... which if we use everything you just said here makes it apparent that you don't have as much evidence on your side, otherwise everyone would agree with you. Just admit that you prefer fascism as long as your party is the one in charge, that's at least honest, since you are promoting fascist biased and activist journalism. \n\n\nYour assumption is that just because something is in the minority of beliefs that it's wrong... which if everyone in history thought like you, we'd simply have a global dictatorship with no journalism because any dissenting voices would be thrown out to never be heard and spread. I honestly can't believe you are advocating for silencing those you disagree with. If we did that, then gays and women would have never gained any rights. I don't think you've thought this through very well, as I don't think your intent is fascism, yet that's exactly what you are advocating for.", "112" ], [ "Pre ACA would be awesome for everyone but those with preexisting conditions. It would be easier to figure out a charitable way to take care of those people than to simply redistribute wealth... this article says they are taxing the \"wealthy\".. well that's simply not true. The premiums are through the roof to pay for those that contribute nothing into taxes or the system... many of them contribute nothing by choice, not because they are unable. It's burdening small businesses and the middle class the most. The only people that aren't hurt by the bill are the very very poor and the very very wealthy, everyone in the middle is paying for these shitty plans that do nothing for more of the poor people they are paying for. The entire ACA was a con job that was written partially by a felon that was in jail for fraud, and people like <PERSON> who openly admit that they relied on the stupidity of the American people to ram it through because if they knew what was in it they would never be able to pass it. Literally subverting the will of the people and going against the very people they are supposed to represent. \n\n\nHow can anybody still defend it? Even the dems aren't defending Obamacare anymore, they are just pissed the republicans aren't replacing it with anything that creates more entitlements for their rich friends and breaking the backs of the middle class. My fear is that it's too far and too gone to bring the prices back down to where they were pre ACA with was about 150-200 dollars for GOOD insurance for an individual. Now it's 500 a month for a young healthy adult for a decent plan and for a family of 5 it's 1600 a month for a decent basic plan. That's a mortgage payment on a decent condo or small house. Where before the ACA they would have payed about 450-600 for their entire family per month with better coverage.\n\n\nComplete sham.", "56" ], [ "This is a last ditch effort to delegitimize <PERSON> to save their grasp on the political establishment which gives them their media monopoly on truth. All they can do is try to call <PERSON> a liar or they know they are done. At this point, it's not even about turning profits, it about keeping their heads above water as they drown in a new media landscape where the dinosaurs are becoming extinct and <PERSON> is the meteor decimating them. They are out for blood because they know once they are done there's no coming back. They are almost ready to stick a fork in them. They don't care about professionalism, it was just a facade anyway. Look professional and act professional and people will believe you. They've been caught lying too many times so now they have to double down. Politifact put out a whole series of calling <PERSON> a liar when in every fact check they basically say that his numbers and what he said was accurate, they just didn't like the way he said it, so therefore it was \"mostly false\" or \"half true\" when they do the opposite for liberal politicians. I hope they all go under, we'll be better off without the fake news.", "988" ], [ "I'm betting that the real conspiracy is that <PERSON> and <PERSON> are the ones actually working with the Russians to delegitimize the <PERSON> administration. I wouldn't be surprised is the ambassador is a double or triple spy. We know <PERSON> set up the meeting between him and sessions and that he met at the white house with <PERSON> at least half a dozen to a dozen times on record and that many other democrats met with him and some even lied about it directly saying she had met with an ambassador but not that particular ambassador (<PERSON>) which turned out to be a lie as there is a photo of it.\n\n\nMark my words, I'm betting the real story is that if anyone is in collusion with the Russians, it's <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and the dems.", "860" ], [ "They are pushing this shit to kids via snapchat. I rarely use the app, but have some friends that are avid users and it's entertaining to see what they are up to without having to be on facebook. I noticed one day there were sponsored articles and blurbs and what are basically power pointesque type of article things. The amount of propaganda from CNN, VICE, VOX, Salon, etc... was mind boggling. Everything from polyamory to <PERSON> being a pussy grabbing liar and how much he's harming the country. The headlines will be \"How will the country recover after a <PERSON> presidency\" Then have a slideshow of lies presented as facts. Right now they have one titled \"which one is the real <PERSON>\" Then one of the mini videos has a graphic saying \"diplomacy, real handshakes\" and a few others and them dropping into a golden toilet with <PERSON>'s name on it while this guy goes around in these videos talking shit on <PERSON>. Calling him an autocrat and accidental president. Then continuing implying he's wrong about calling CNN and them fake news. It's disgusting that This is being pushed to kids and their parents likely don't even know the app has that function.\n\n\nThe other one today is \"can you spot the fake news\" and to their credit they showed that fake <PERSON> quote about running as a republican was fake, but continued on mostly pushing mainstream news as being real as long as they don't use .co or some other shorter prefix in the url. \n\n\nIt's a shame that they need these giant media companies to profit off of children.", "827" ], [ "<PERSON> resigned for lying, his conversation was not illegal, and it's been thoroughly debunked that he even really intended to lie. His mistake was not being thorough enough in his briefing to <PERSON>. It's a big nothing burger. \n\n\nThe Dossier has been floating around for more than half a year and nobody is trying to claim it's real, and they've shown the author was being paid by one of our agencies to create dirt on <PERSON>. \n\n\nI am impressed at your ability to bookmark ridiculous fake news stories that take hearsay from anonymous sources and publish \"possibilities\" like a fun fantasy story for people like you to go attempt to connect dots where there are none. \n\n\nThe reason we go back to <PERSON> is because that's who you guys prefer to be in office. Now go connect dots for her, where there is PROOF she was taking money from 3rd world dictators through her foundation and has ACTUAL ties to Russia and helped sign off on the Uranium One deal as money was flowing into her laundering foundation, er I mean \"charity\" that her own daughter hired laywers to investigate because she thought they were doing illegal things. Those lawyers said it was operating like a political operation, not a charity... and surprise! They shut down the charity right after she would have more time to dedicate to go around helping all those poor people they helped. \n\n\n<PERSON> connections are all these imaginary things... <PERSON>'s were real and verifiable. Yet, you guys were pretty quiet on her throughout the election.", "860" ], [ "Those were not really concentration camps in the way most people might think of the term concentration camp. It was horrible, but many of the Japanese that lived through it said they understood why it was done and held no grudge about it, and it was ultimately overturned and they even paid reparations to them and their families. It took a while until we did that, but we did. When you are hit by a surprise attack and lose a lot of people, tempers flare and people act irrationally.", "655" ], [ "Actually, it's illegal to even collect all of that technically. They just dance around it making it sound like they weren't doing that by using spook speak that the general public doesn't recognize. <PERSON> flat out lied and you could tell he didn't want to but knew he had to. \n\n\nHe had that same look again in the most recent TV interview saying \"I can deny\"... which looked like a knee jerk response to CYA.", "903" ], [ "And you are missing the point that it's not a journalist's job to \"fact check\". Journalism has rules of ethics which is why \"bias\" is considered such a bad word in journalism. The point is that if the journalists are biased, then you have nobody to trust to simply inform the people of the facts since bias leads to skewed facts, slanted stories, and spin on top of spin, which is what we are seeing today in all forms of media. \n\n\nJournalists are supposed to be skeptical and push back on both sides equally, and let the people defending those sides defend them for themselves and be an objective observer. Especially since the term \"facts\" are thrown around pretty loosely. Look at politifact.. professional fact checking site and they are extremely biased, which most liberals in this sub even often admit is the case. \n\n\nJournalist's jobs are to ask questions, and report the answers, not to tell you the viewer what you should believe. I know it's tempting when your people are in control of the media to want them to just report your beliefs as infallible empirical truth, but that's how tyranny happens. Especially in a world where 6 people own 90% of the media. Go look up the <PERSON> segments on how the news all sounds the same. Even their little kitten stories are all scripted. Biased journalism is how we got to this point of so much fake news. Maybe the flat earther doesn't need as much time in front of the screen, but we shouldn't be afraid of him being on the screen at all. As soon as he can't defend his position thoroughly it all falls apart. It's not a journalists job to tell people... but to simply show them by asking questions. \n\n\nI know this will be unpopular in this sub, but watch <PERSON>... he's pretty fair and questions people on both the right and left fairly equally. But his brilliance comes from simply asking questions and letting people try to defend what they said and watching it unravel as they can't even defend their stance outside of the catchy soundbytes and catch phrases. But then you turn on CNN or MSNBC and watch them call people liars and have a panel of 3 people supporting their side and 1 person on the other where they literally team up and bully people and call them names and talk over them. That's not journalism, it's activism, and I'm sure if conservatives owned most of the mainstream media you wouldn't agree with thinking they should be \"fact checking\" the people live on air because you know it will be just as biased favoring them as every lefty media company is these days. \n\n\nAnd the people's whose job is to investigate often like to lie or mislead or omit things. So people have to do their own research. It's unfortunate but it's reality.", "840" ], [ "Then you go and use fake news.\n\nThe \"muslim ban\" wasn't a muslim ban, it was an extension of a travel ban requiring more stringent vetting that was enacted by the <PERSON> administration and actually more lax and shorter in length than the <PERSON> administration. <PERSON> targeted those seven countries as terror threats after the bowling green incident where they arrested 2 men who were flying weapons to Al Qaeda, one of which had his finger prints found on an IED that killed American troops. But believe your fake news it's a \"muslim ban\" despite many citizens from most muslim countries having no trouble coming in. That's fake news you are watching telling you that.\n\n\nDo nothing wall? The one <PERSON> and <PERSON> and <PERSON> all voted for? He's using the law that was already passed by them to do it. <PERSON> built over 700 miles of that wall while he was president using he same law.\n\n\nHealthcare is a clusterfuck admittedly and Obamacare was a disaster, at the moment that's still up in the air but unlikely to get much better until some heads roll for obamacare.\n\ndenial of admittedly fabricated data? Show my exactly what percentage of climate change humans are attributed for... you can't, because that data doesn't exist. Nobody can say and most the data is adjusted and manipulated to fit the narrative. We don't even have enough hard data to actually make the case for anthropomorphic climate change.\n\nTwitter rage fits? <PERSON> just threw them on camera as did <PERSON>. <PERSON> came out and scolded the nation as some sort of higher moral authority when things didn't go his way... the ex coke head, bath house visiting stoner... yeah that's rich. <PERSON> \"why am I not drunkenly 50 points ahead\" <PERSON>. Seriously, they are all jokes.\n\n\nEveryone in politics is a walking conflict of interest. <PERSON> at least made his money, while congress voted themselves raises and legalized insider trading... things Trump would have been arrested for if he had done them. But yeah... that evil <PERSON> calling people on their lies. Please.", "296" ], [ "His ban was based on <PERSON>'s ban, but you didn't care when <PERSON> did it, right? \n\n\nA bit hypocritical... but that seems to be the leftist platform these days. \n\n\nTell me again how carbon taxes are saving the planet and not just concentrating the ability to pollute to the wealthiest big corps? And it's a known fact that dems are attacking the fossil fuel industry because it holds political power. <PERSON> went after the <PERSON> brothers despite the fact they hold less power than any of the major dem investors. And you say I'm sticking my head in the sand? The left is just bitter they lost and is throwing a collective temper tantrum. Saudi Arabia holds power through OPEC... I suggest you look into that if you want real answers about why not even trump can ban the Saudis... just like <PERSON> didn't.", "771" ], [ "That's the thing. They don't care. They are projecting their own actions and biases onto <PERSON> supporters. <PERSON> has been in office for one month and they are already acting like the world is ending when all he's done is enforce the laws and implement a ban on travel from 7 countries <PERSON>'s admin picked as terror risk countries. The rest is hyperbolic manufactured outrage over hearsay from anonymous sources. When any of these people are willing to put their actual reputation on the line to make these claims about Trump, not just reporting what some anonymous person claims *might* be partially true... then it may warrant an investigation. When I hear democrats call for an investigation into pedogate or the clinton foundation now that they are shutting it down right after losing their pay to play ability, then I might start taking them seriously. But it's just a temper tantrum, a bunch of spoiled kids with daddy issues that are used to stomping their feet and getting their way, and the politicians coddle them and reassure them their tantrums are justified. It's pretty appalling. Most <PERSON> supporters are simply anti establishment, and <PERSON> is hated by both sides of the establishment, which to me means he's doing something right.", "249" ], [ "It has a little to do with his celebrity, known as a tough shrewd businessman that went to one of the most in debt men in the country, to one of the wealthiest. Name recognition and reputation help... <PERSON>'s reputation was riding <PERSON>'s coattails and corruption and she seemed vapid, hollow, and in some videos like she was a drunk \"WHY AM I NOT 50 POINTS AHEAD YOU MIGHT ASK\". She is also the definition of establishment. \n\n\nThe reason <PERSON> won isn't because of some imaginary racism or misogyny or the patriarchy, it's because people were sick of the political establishment whores lying to them while skirting the laws and changing them so they can profit and ignoring the laws they didn't like to the detriment of our own citizens. Welfare for illegals is outright theft, period. That was a big one. <PERSON>, quite frankly, was America's middle finger to the <PERSON> administration. The racism was coming from democrats blaming straight white males for all the problems in the black community and calling them racist and bigots if they disagreed with <PERSON> on anything. If the dems continue with their racism, then you may actually create number 2, but it doesn't exist and wasn't the reason <PERSON> won. Keep calling people racist, and xenophobic, and bigots that are good decent people and eventually they will push back... if simply defending themselves by saying you are wrong, then they may eventually feel they might as well become those things, because then there's at least a path other than simply putting their tail between their legs and retreating to the names you call them. \n\n\nYou guys better wake up to your party's bullshit soon, or you will create the problem you imagine you have. And trust me, if you actually had that problem, of number 2, things would be very different and that's not a world you want to live in, nor continue to create. But this democrat hyperbolic rhetoric is pushing some people to their tipping point... you guys are creating the problem, not pointing it out.", "939" ], [ "I'd have voted for literally anyone other than <PERSON>. <PERSON> was a corrupt <PERSON> and Global Bankster puppet using the Clinton Foundation in an incredibly shady way, selling out our country to line her and her family's coffers. I would have voted for <PERSON> or <PERSON> before I'd vote for that corrupt disgusting wench of a woman. Her arrogance was unparalleled with anything I've seen from anyone... her lies were constant to the point I doubt she even has any real opinions on anything anymore, just what her puppet masters command her to. And she's connected to that sick fuck <PERSON>.\n\n\nSo you hit the nail on the head. <PERSON> was the middle finger to <PERSON> and the <PERSON> admin for playing identity politics and blaming a majority of the country (hard working white men) for all the problems in the world. The real racists and bigots were the dems, and they played that card one too many times.", "557" ], [ "No, an emolument is a fee, salary, or profit from employment or office. \n\n\nI know you want it to mean what you just said, but words have actual definitions and meanings, and what you just said is *factually incorrect* and is the further spreading of a falsehood. \n\n\nLet's see what an actual *constitutional lawyer* has to say... through the washington post even...\n\n_URL_0_\n\n\nYeah sorry, he's not breaking any laws. I know you all want it to be true so bad, but he isn't yet.", "712" ], [ "Oh please. Didn't hurt <PERSON> or <PERSON> and they were lying straight through their teeth on a regular basis. They couldn't even keep a straight face through most of their lies and scolded the press when they pressed too hard... they set the precedent. \n\n\nThis is the first time the press room has actually felt alive and not the same 7 people repeating the same questions over and over day after day for their scripted MSM agendas. People from all over are getting a chance to ask real questions for a change. He will be very loved by everyone in media, as everyone knows the job is to go be the president's voice whether he agrees with him or not.", "622" ], [ "Because they didn't hold enough in the senate, and impeachment can't go anywhere without the senate votes. It's as simple as that. It's pretty clear he did... and while I don't agree with everything on this following list being a crime and the website is fairly sensational, it's a pretty decent starting point and some of these more than likely had to be crimes. The worst in my opinion were fast and furious and the failure to faithfully execute our immigration laws claiming prosecutorial discretion, which historically by the spirit and letter of the law was used in an individual case by case basis, not to be used as a blanket for an entire category of law, which led to the catch and release of murders, rapists, felons, child kidnappers and abusers, and more... and that's an indisputable fact.\n\n\nBut here's a pretty decent list...\n\n_URL_0_", "554" ], [ "But anybody that knows how budgets work know that money is fungible even when they try to act like it isn't. \n\nExample: Let's say you make 1000 dollars a month. Your current spending is 700 dollars on rent 200 on food and 100 dollars on house supplies. Now at the moment you can't afford to buy weed and I promise that as long as you don't spend it on weed I'll help you out with an extra 100 dollars a month. Now you could put that money into a special savings and show me you are only spending that on your house supplies... but now it has freed up 100 dollars from your old budget you can now go spend on weed.\n\n\nSo basically, if they are getting government funding it could free money to be used for that purpose. However, my understanding is that PP charges for abortions and makes a significant amount of money from them, so I'm not sure how it is being claimed the money is being spent on abortions unless they are only charging partial costs from patients for the procedure.", "683" ], [ "In Oregon? You mean the wildlife refuge where everyone charged was found not guilty, and the only casualty was a guy that knew they wanted to shoot him so he ran away from his car to make sure they didn't shoot the rest of his family? \n\n\nAnd when governments start shooting on protesters that's when foreign governments come in and start arming them. See: Every single regime change and government overthrow the US has orchestrated through covert and overt methods... you know kind of like how <PERSON> and <PERSON> armed \"moderate\" rebels to overthrow <PERSON>. As soon as <PERSON> shot at his own citizens it was game over until the Russians stepped in to defend him. \n\n\nYou should go read the federalist papers and then follow that up with some constitutional professor's writings from the top colleges and top military leaders of our country. You'd be really surprised.", "399" ], [ "This is exactly right. I have worked in HR and their job, really, is to protect the company. They have to take certain things seriously and that's definitely one of them. Unfortunately, white straight males are not a protected class (at least not in my state). And, being a protected class is pretty much the only way you can win a lawsuit, which is what they are afraid of. \n\n\nSo this may or may not work depending on your work environment, the size of the company, the level of diversity, the company culture, etc... \n\n\nCould be a good strategy, I'm just not a huge fan of the sink to their level type of stuff, but I suppose sometimes you have to fight fire with fire.", "679" ], [ "If you list their business on your social media, then any lawyer could make a pretty easy case that you are, in fact, representing their company, and they would have a right to fire you. In many states they don't even need to state a reason to fire someone, in which case, makes it smart to either not put stuff on your social media that makes the company look bad, or don't put the company name on your page and keep it private.", "402" ], [ "It would be tough to be worse and more divisive than <PERSON> as he does everything to undermine the smooth transition of power and our democracy after saying the election can't be rigged and \"what does that even mean\" when he thought they had it rigged themselves, playing dumb, when that intel report was supposedly going around for months, and the emails had been out for months with the Russia claim. Pure dishonesty and quite the charlatan. Then he ends his term by signing off on allowing tons of raw Uranium to be sold to Iran and is talking about releasing a bunch of prisoners from Gitmo, and writing as many lame duck regulations as he can before he leaves. \n\n\nIf <PERSON> does worse, I would almost be impressed. But I really don't think it's possible. The media is mostly left leaning though, so he could fix everything and they'll still say the sky is falling to keep you as their mental slaves on their plantation.", "533" ], [ "I honestly don't think he's going to hurt social issues, that's not his goal. His goal is to enforce our laws and cut the fat and reign everything in back to a manageable size as per the constitution, returning many things to state's rights, where yes, some social issues may go back the other way. But that's how the state's were designed, so there could be a place for everybody to go, but are protected as a group of states despite our differences. \n\nIt gets confusing to me, because the main single social issue of the left seems to be gay marriage and abortion and raising minimum wage. Yet, at the same time, they are importing cheap uneducated labor that doesn't speak a lick of english that's willing to work for pennies on the dollar driving wages down instead of up and sapping up tax dollars that should go to our own citizens while they send money out of our economy back to Mexico. \n\nAnd importing ultra conservative refugees (muslim refugees) is going to hurt social issues more in the long run. They out breed the rest of the world and have very large families and are very anti gay and anti women having rights and anti any type of western type of having fun like drinking. To me, that's where the left really loses me completely on the logic. Why not have strict standards on who we let in, just as you would for letting guests into your own home? \n\n\nIt just seems contradictory to me, and I genuinely do not understand. It seems like it comes from an altruistic place, but it seems overly altruistic to the point of ignoring reality hoping that flooding the country with religious fanatics isn't going to back fire. \n\nAnyway... I guess only time will tell. I don't think you have as much to worry about as the media would like to have you think. That's how they keep their viewers thinking the way they want (on both sides) sell you fear to keep you tuned in. Cheers.", "799" ], [ "They can think, they choose not to, because it would mean they have to go against the social flow and ruffle feathers. Most liberals pride themselves on their social circles and being liked by the people that they want to like them. It's willful ignorance to not rock the boat of their friends. It's a culture of peer pressure, victim status (for more attention and credibility when addressing social issues), and how violently you speak out against the opposition. Once they are in that deep, it takes a lot to break them free of the conditioning.", "30" ], [ "Not immunity, but white collar prisons I'd be ok with as long as it's substantial information exposing at least 5 routes that lead to other connections or 3 of the top heads of several smaller operations. Things like pie gate are difficult because infiltrating it requires allowing kids to be abused if they want to dig deeper and find more connections instead of just squashing it and rescuing the kids. The incredibly unfortunate reality is that if it's as big as it seems, you would have to let a lot of children go on being hurt for quite a while in hopes that you could eventually dig deep enough to stop it from the top. I don't envy the men and women that investigate this type of stuff, but I sure as hell respect them immensely. The hardest of jobs.", "279" ], [ "Quite possibly. But, this isn't the first time he's requested this. He sees that now it's a real possibility, he doesn't have to give himself up to the US, seems like he's pushing because he sees a real chance it might happen and he wants to make it more enticing to do so, and the fact that in his recent interview he implied they were going after his family... he's been held captive for 5 years and had all kinds of fake charges brought against him. It's the next chapter and he still has insurance files. Cabin fever has to be getting to him at this point.", "140" ], [ "Not even just rejected <PERSON>, but if the media was less corrupt they wouldn't have buried her corruption and we wouldn't have people who spend their lives in an echo chamber thinking the world is about to end and that they are all going to be put into camps. It's emotional terrorism for political gain on their own followers, and it's absolutely reprehensible because many of them are actually very altruistic people with good intentions. The media is taking advantage of their trust and notoriety. It's disgusting and I hope most of them awaken soon.", "759" ], [ "> No matter political orientation, you have the right to be outraged by this incident. This is deeply wrong.\n\n\nThe fact that a mod had to make that post and state this above shows what a shit show that sub is, clarifying that <PERSON> haters still have the right to be mad about it, because they are so crazy about their hate they need to be told it's ok to not cheer on a kidnapping and torture. Then they try to claim they were being \"brigaded\" and that it wasn't their actual users of that sub glorifying the attack, despite the fact it's a sub literally based around hate, so it's unsurprising. The media equating <PERSON> to a Nazi and bullshit social media echo chambers like that sub are the exact reason <PERSON> supporters are being attacked. \"<PERSON> is racist, a bigot, xenophobic, LITERALLY Hitler!!1!\" (etc, etc, etc...) This mentality sets the stage for slightly unstable people to feel in the right and justified, because after all we HATE the Nazis... so if <PERSON> is <PERSON> then his followers must be Nazis. That is an intentional function. Then the top comment is saying it wasn't racially motivated. Please. That sub is trash, I don't consider them the enemy, I consider them hateful fools that waste their lives spewing negativity instead of trying to make the world a more positive place. I feel sorry for them and how completely brainwashed they are. I hope they find some peace in their lives and break free of their conditioning eventually.", "743" ], [ "I was out camping in the desert with a kid who grew up in Los Angeles and had never really been outside of the city or been camping. He didn't even think to look up, when I pointed it out, he was in awe and looked really confused. He just looked up staring and said \"What IS that?\". And I told him it was stars, and he looked at me even more confused and skeptical like I was pulling his leg. \"Those... are ALL stars... what is that thing going across?\" as he pointed at the milky way... and I told him it was the milky way. He must of stood there staring for a good 10-15 minutes in awe. There was no moon and perfectly clear that night so it was as good as it gets for that area, where the closest city larger than a couple blocks was probably 2 hours away in any direction.", "8" ], [ "Actually, originally, and I wish I knew where the original article was as it was many years ago, but tasers were ruled that they should ONLY be used in a situation where a gun would be used to minimize the chances of death resulting. One of the largest creators of tasers recommends not shooting above the waste due to the possibility of cardiac arrest. I'm unaware if any of this actually changed in the 6 plus years ago I read about that in, but technically yes... they are supposed to engage in physical combat.", "1016" ], [ "I have mixed feelings on it. I can see both sides of the argument. Non compliance can be extended pretty far and then becomes subjective. Is the lady drawing on the sidewalk with chalk disobeying the cop's orders, as he tells her to stop and she refuses, allowed to be tazed? Or just men of equal size or bigger or people that look twacked out? It's a tough situation, but in the past the rules of engagement of the old created a less tense atmosphere around cops than exists these days. Just watch the really old episodes of the TV show COPS. Interesting perspective.", "141" ], [ "But from what I read <PERSON> replaced a lot of the top brass from top to bottom. And in a national emergency type of false flag situation, there'd be a lot of confusion and claims that it's Russia or something. I think it's pretty far fetched, but I used to think the global pedo ring and some of these people being lucipherians was far fetched too. So at this point, I'm not sure anything would surprise me with how desperate the establishment seems at the moment. Just look at this Russia bullshit and pissgate.", "629" ], [ "Except BLM has defended horrible people. Sorry, bang a guy's head into concrete you get shot (<PERSON>). Nobody listened to the court case, they wanted to lynch his shooter because the media made him look whiter and edited his tape to sound racist. Then you have a kid walking in the street disobeying orders after just committing a strong arm theft of blunts which is technically robbery who then decides to attack a police officer in his car that outweighed the officer by a lot and had the upper hand in hand to hand. (<PERSON>) and they go out and made up the \"hands up don't shoot\" lie to make him look innocent and the white officer look like he decided to go make a sport of shooting a black \"kid\". \n\n\nThe whole movement is racist against blacks, as it insists that they should hold no responsibility for their actions because they will be inherently violent and disobey authority and expect no consequences. So they want to be able to commit crimes, disobey authority, resist arrest, fight with people trying to enforce our laws and expect there to be no consequences. Either they are trying to create black supremacy by allowing them to commit crimes and fight police, or they think they are incapable of not committing crimes and fighting. Either way, BLM is racist against their own, and it's propagated and funded mostly by people like <PERSON> that are using these fools as pawns to push their own agendas. Hope they start waking up soon. It's a cultural problem, not a race problem.", "577" ], [ "<PERSON> is an incredibly unfortunate situation and to my knowledge we do not have video of what led up to the shooting. He was (supposedly legally) carrying a weapon and went to reach for his license. The officer involved was clearly not taking any joy in that situation as he was nearly in tears. But if you tell an officer you are armed, you don't reach for anything, doesn't matter what color you are. This was a chinese officer, this man was not targeted because he was black, it was because he was armed and started reaching down. They are carrying weed with their daughter in the car, so their judgement clearly isn't the greatest in the world. He supposedly matched an description of an armed robbery suspect as well, though that was fairly weak from what I remember. Unfortunate, but you don't reach for ANYthing once an officer knows you are armed. We don't know if they were giving him attitude and being rude which will put an officer even more on edge when someone starts reaching for something. \n\n\n<PERSON> is one of the few, along with <PERSON>. But again, you have a couple issues. Once <PERSON> tried to grab his taser, and fought and resisted, it became a felony. In many states it is legal to shoot a fleeing felon. I understand why the law exists, and in some cases it may be justified, though I don't believe this to be one of them. However, did he break the law? Not if they have the fleeing felon law. But he is one of the better cases they should be talking about. Not \"hands up don't shoot\". \n\n\nThe best case they had I forget the name of the guy because BLM for some reason never ran with that one. It was a man that worked taking care of mentally handicapped adults, and was trying to protect one of the patients and they just opened fire for no apparent reason. Yet, they never pushed for it. Why? Because they couldn't make it about race because a white handicapped guy sparked the whole event. \n\n\nSo, yeah most of these have a lot of circumstances surrounding them, long histories of crimes or active crimes, and combative behavior. \n\n\nI think <PERSON>, from what I can see on the videos, should not have been shot. But if it wasn't illegal to do so because of the fleeing felon rule, then the law is the problem that needs to be addressed along with a culture of crime in poor neighborhoods. Hopefully <PERSON> makes some good strides there, and hopefully that community will stop thinking it's not cool to be smart and be educated and do homework and speak properly so they can get good jobs. As long as being a thug and hard and dealing drugs is \"cool\" and give you street red, unfortunately the culture will not change. It's deeply imbedded in most of their music as well, which is how most young kids are recruited into all types of shady scenes. The neo nazis used ska and punk bands as recruitment tools. I don't know how to fix it. But BLM is making things more tense, not creating peace or fixing anything.", "399" ], [ "Close... they live in a different reality. Because, reality is what you perceive it to be... at least to you it is. Phenomenology. When you live in echo chambers, you end up believing the consensus is the same everywhere as it is inside your echo chamber. So to many of them, they truly live in a different reality in their own minds. The media plays on this. Go watch the news... they use fear constantly because fear is the most primal instinctual emotion beyond hunger and sex. And fear takes over both of those. Talk about something scary, make it sound more common and scarier and people listen closely trying to learn how to protect themselves from the danger. They end up in these feedback loops where they've decided what the threats are and solutions are... and anyone that disagrees is the thing they are afraid of. Which is why they try to shut down opposing speech... because they've convinced them that the \"danger\" they face is opposing ideas. It would be impressive if it wasn't so sad and kind of frightening that they are capable of painting 50 & #37; of the country as \"deplorable\" people that are beyond redemption by twisting <PERSON>'s words out of context to make him look \"racist\" and like a \"bigot\". They call everyone xenophobic, yet ironically are the people that shut themselves off from any ideas outside of their echo chambers. \n\nWe need a T. Gondii study badly... I'm convinced that liberals have impaired threat assessment capabilities, and ironically pharma bro sold the cure to that.", "30" ], [ "You are missing the point that this just awakened another concept people weren't thinking about. If they win this case against <PERSON> they are declaring Twitter an official public forum. By doing so they may open themselves up to another law where company owned cities were unable to limit speech because they had a monopoly on the city. So it may stand that Twitter, by banning political speech, may be in violation of the same law they previously ruled on. You should read the link.", "106" ], [ "I remember as soon as some departments started ordering cameras these stories started getting more press about civil rights violations. They know they are all mostly making shit up. Every single time someone goes to the media with something the footage always comes out and nearly always exonerates the cops... at least when it's THEIR body camera. Which means the body cameras are having the proper effect. And, when wrong doing is done, it is answered for, like when the kid was shot in the hall after the crazy cop made them play simon says and crawl on his knees against all training and proper procedures.", "141" ], [ "Actually, all taxes are supposed to be voluntary. In fact, <PERSON> repeatedly in a veiled way kind of threatened the IRS with that fact during the weaponizing of the IRS. Basically reminding them that they are technically supposed to be \"voluntary\" and that people could stop trusting the IRS and stop paying if that trust is lost. Obviously he parsed his words carefully because everyone in government knows how important tax dollars are... but it was a good moment that he did a few times. Basically, we don't NEED the IRS in a voluntary system and the taxes are decided by the citizens. Obviously they will still arrest you if you don't pay your taxes... but technically they aren't supposed to be able to as per the constitution. Double taxation is also kind of ridiculous, and some states have gotten it right by not having income tax. It's almost triple taxation if you think about it, same with yearly housing taxes, which a few states don't have as well. You get feds taxing your income, the state taxing your income, then when you go to spend your money you are taxed again on the item by the state, in most states at least. You pay tax on your house, then you pay taxes again every year even when it is paid off.", "322" ], [ "Eh, in an age where pensions don't exist as often anymore I have no problem with Social Security. You pay into it your whole life and get an amount back based on what you were paying in. I know WAY too many retirees who depend on social security to survive off of along with their meager savings after working hard their entire lives. The problem is that congress has looted the SS fund to give to other programs basically leaving an IOU in its place. Another reason why they want population growth through immigration, because they need new people to prop up those funds... rather than making cuts in spending and finding other ways to repay the funds. Government exists to sustain and expand itself, which is why it's important to have checks, balances, and extensive audits. Because if they don't use all their budget it gets cut the next year \\(as it should\\) so instead they end up wasting money on ridiculous luxuries at the end of the year. Oh we have 50k we didn't spend? Better go upgrade all the chairs in the office to 2k dollar designer chairs... better put some marbling in the entry way of the building... better get some 5 star catered lunches and a team building exercise at that 5 star resort.", "264" ], [ "I am talking about both sides. However, I'd say if you look at statistics, one side has a better argument than the other. Liberals want you to fear ideas that are different than theirs. Conservatives want you to fear stupid policies that allow our country to be taken over by lawlessness. It's all a distraction from the shit they are actually doing behind the scenes. It's all theater. These guys are all buddies for the most part behind closed doors. They go put on a pretty show for their constituents in front of the cameras. Then go back and scheme how to push through legislation that benefits them and screws the tax payers. The media is part of the government now it seems as you never hear them report on bipartisan legislation that is passed... like when they legalized propaganda to be used on our own citizens here in America. Or when they repealed consumer protection laws. Or when they made it legal for them to do insider trading while keeping it illegal for citizens. Or when they looted social security. Or when they exempted themselves from Obamacare... etc etc", "348" ], [ "Have you ever met someone that went into journalism? They almost ALL go into broadcast journalism because they want to be famous on TV but have no talent in acting and know they aren't that intelligent. So they think.. gee I can go listen to people, write stuff down and then read it just fine. They are not the sharpest tools in the shed and for the most part investigative journalism is dead... especially with the deaths of <PERSON> and <PERSON>. And guess who the target of <PERSON> next story was right before his car exploded after thinking it was tampered with? I'll give you a hit... he was high up in the intel community and looks like super villain and recently turned twitter troll.", "624" ], [ "Also, we never saw those 33k emails... we saw <PERSON>'s emails.\n\nBut another point... since liberals are ok with all this \"not spying\" I'm sure they'd be ok if <PERSON>'s CIA and FBI planted \"informants\" in liberal campaigns this campaign season... you know for the good of the country to make sure they are conspiring with foreign governments or anything. Surely they won't mind.", "298" ], [ "Separation between church and state doesn't have anything to do with banning all mention of God in courts and schools though. Has to do with mandating religious beliefs. They have no problem teaching kids about the quran in school... I say fine... lets teach kids about every religion and their beliefs. Teach them all, or teach none... or endorse charter school voucher program so people can choose the school that teaches the values that they want their kids to be taught.", "165" ], [ "Or, maybe his brother knew <PERSON> was going to pass the emails to Wikileaks and maybe even had a hand in it, and now they are all afraid for that truth to come out because they don't want to lose their other son, or worse. There is a witch hunt for \"Russia\"... but what if you knew your own son or brother or yourself as the brother was in fact the \"Russia\" they have been hunting for. You might just want to keep it quiet... and the democrats want to distance themselves from <PERSON>, as it DOES seem politically motivated... and if it's proven that the <PERSON> brothers are the \"Russian hackers\" then their entire year long rants about Russia backfires spectacularly. That's the only thing that makes sense other than some kind of direct threat for them to keep their mouths shut, and it would make more sense to me at this point.", "169" ], [ "She literally said that after she heard about <PERSON> rich she was afraid to stand in front of windows fearing snipers. She knows how dirty her side is... they all do. That's what keeps them all in line. It's like people in abusive relationships. They fear messing up, so they always do what will keep their abusers happy, and in return the abuser occasionally does really big acts of kindness and treats them very very well, until they \"mess up\" again. They are afraid to leave, knowing how dangerous they are and don't want to make them mad. Look at <PERSON>... look at <PERSON>... look what happens when you start thinking out of lockstep. Not even endorsing the other side inherently... just criticizing theirs and thinking differently. They instantly start to collectively attack like a bee hive that just got the chemical signal to all attack. Actual hive mind mentality.", "52" ], [ "> We are organizing a synchronized mass meditation/prayer for the mass arrests of the DC pedophiles (see pizagate). This will happen on Saturday February 25th 11:11am - 11:33am (22 minutes) EST (16:11 UTC). Visualize the criminals being arrested leading to fair and public trials. The intention should not be for revenge but for saving the children and the healing of humanity.\n > If you are unsure about what effect this can have please read about the science that proves the power of the mind:\n > _URL_2_\n > and especially the effect of mass meditations (also known as Maharishi effect):\n > _URL_1_\n > Please spread this message!\n > If anybody knows <PERSON> or other \"well-connected\" people in this community, please tell them about this.\n > Note: by bringing this issue to public attention (through public trials) the \"healing of humanity\" will occur.\n > _URL_0_\n\n\n\nJust commenting to check out your links later. Good call and good intention pede.", "587" ], [ "To be fair, there is a way he could have known. Other people come in and out of the dressing rooms. Simply asking one of the coaches or team assistants if everyone was dressed before walking in is a pretty common thing in the sports world for both men and women when someone from the opposite sex wants to come in and say a word or give a greeting. Lots of men coach women's teams and do exactly that.", "139" ], [ "It's been a month... lol. So far he's increased vetting for immigrants (the ban wasn't stopped by the way, just one part of it had an injunction placed on it by the 9th circuit which is historically almost always overturned and has like 9 judges out of 24 appointed by <PERSON>), he's unleashed ICE and border agents to be able to actually do their jobs without fear of repercussions for doing so. He's called out the media for their lies and spin on everything for the last decade. He avoided WW3 with Russia (that <PERSON> clearly wanted). His pick got rid of the 7th floor \"Shadow government\" (that is the FBI report's description of them), he's increased the press pool where they are actually calling on smaller networks and getting real questions instead of the fluff they used to give <PERSON>. He's put a real General that is trusted by the military in charge of it. He's brought down the cost of the fighter jets. He's getting rid of the TPP. He's read to renegotiate NAFTA. He's signed the order to build the wall (that <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON> all voted for). He's weathered a storm of manufactured outrage and fake protesters. He appointed a real patriot as AG instead of some partisan hack like <PERSON> who *literally said we need to brainwash people to think about guns differently using hollywood*. \n\nHe signed an order to delay the fudiciary rules so they could review them or stop the train wreck <PERSON> tried to leave for him (which was smart even if you don't like it).\n\nSigned an order to create more concise regulations by having to eliminate two for every one created.\n\nThe lobbyist ban is long overdue and doesn't go far enough. And I think with as many regulations as we have on citizens, one for ex politicians addressing rampant corruption is not bad, but you can't bring yourself to agree with anything <PERSON> does, so you imagine that's bad some how... go figure...\n\nHe signed an order to devise a comprehensive plan to take out ISIS that we now have a new alliance with Russia to help us do.\n\nAn order to build back up the military, an order to end sanctuary cities encouraging people to break our laws and leach off the tax payers.\n\n\nForcing the pipeline to be built with american made steel, and expediting the reviewal process for government approval of new construction projects and speeding up environmental reviews (that right now take incredibly long amounts of time). \n\nFederal hiring freeze, stopping the already over bloated government from bloating itself more.\n\n\nEliminated the penalty for the ACA and working on rolling it back, which even democrats admit was a disaster and are secretly hoping he comes up with something better to save themselves from the disaster that comes at the end of the year when that finally starts to completely collapse, which it has already been doing the last several years on its own.\n\nEtc... only been a month.. pretty good, I'd say. What did <PERSON> do in 8 years again?", "825" ], [ "It's supposed to be voluntary, which is funny since they use the threat of arrest to make people pay.\n\n\nBut, if they want people to pay taxes and be happy about doing it, then they should allow us to allocate 50% of our taxes however we see fit. It would eliminate a lot of waste and show what people really care about. Then you allow any and all extra money to be also allocated wherever the citizen wants them to go. Then the people who really believe in paying for planned parenthood can do so, and those that don't will not have to. People might actually be a little more excited to pay taxes then.", "409" ], [ "Look, I feel for refugees and poor people alike. But the absolute fact of the matter is that we have an American culture and we have to protect it and other 1st world nations or there will be nowhere for anyone to flee to. We have finite sources and cannot take just anyone and everyone that wants to come here in. Period. That's why immigration laws exist. It's not a hard concept to understand, and if these immigrants were all voting red you guys would be fighting tooth and nail against bringing them in. I'm tired of everyone pretending like that isn't the case. I know it, you know it, everyone knows it, and you guys aren't fooling anyone but maybe yourselves and the most politically ignorant among us.", "799" ], [ "Actually the word was unsubstantiated. AKA there's nothing that suggests it's true, which in journalism means you don't report it. If you are reporting that other people are reporting it in a serious way, giving credulity to an entertainment site like Buzzfeed then you are *in fact* also reporting on it. That's reality. You can try to play word games with the semantics of it all, but you are only fooling yourself and people desperate to believe that because they live in an echo chamber of fear and vitriolic rhetoric telling them the world is going to end and that <PERSON> is literally <PERSON>. It's absurd, and the liberals are becoming the real fascists spreading propaganda trying to undermine our president and democracy. It's a collective temper tantrum and this is how spoiled children act when you take away their favorite toy. The behavior of these so called \"tolerant\" liberals is absolutely abhorrent and despicable.", "30" ], [ "Calling to dismantle the state is pretty much bordering on domestic terrorism, especially since they are beating people unconscious and using violence and destroying property. Blowing up an empty trash can is terrorism even if nobody is around if it's to instill fear and intimidate people. So why isn't destroying stores, looting and rioting when it's for political intimidation.", "673" ], [ "Just make your own pizza, it's way overpriced and it's easy and cheap to make it yourself! \n\nYou can do it in about 20 minutes. Flour, yeast, salt, water for the dough... then some sauce, cheese and whatever toppings you like. You can make about 10 pizzas for 20 dollars unless you get crazy with the toppings. Even then, it's so easy and tastes so much better and you can usually have it made and done before you could ever get it delivered.", "324" ], [ "He's guilty of the same thing <PERSON> is (nothing that we know of)... which is saying that he didn't believe he was molested by the older person because he was attracted to him. It's a common response to child victims because they don't want to feel like they were a victim, and perhaps in their mind they weren't. But any adult, from outside objectively looking in, knows they were victims.\n\n\nThe point here is showing their hypocrisy by putting pressure on a leftist icon. They will have to choose to sacrifice their own (which they probably will) or ease up on <PERSON> (don't hold your breath)", "219" ], [ "Yeah, they kept just vaguely saying stuff like \"nothing happened in Bowling Green, there was no massacre\" omitting the terrorists being caught there which led to the Iraq refugee ban. Now people try to justify it saying, well, they had a reason back then, but nothing has happened to warrant that now. Which is ridiculous because the vetting problems are even worse going into this new travel ban... and why the fuck should we wait until there is an actual massacre to actually do something. It seems like they won't be happy until people are actually dead first.", "296" ], [ "Especially the way he tried to say that pulling the emails out that reference any word would have taken a team of hundreds of people to do... despite the fact they were in a key word searchable database. The guy is a dolt, and CIA officers don't usually go around bragging about their hacking exploits on comedy shows to try and push the \"DAE RUSSIA!!!\" agenda even more. Sad.", "629" ], [ "To put it simply... if you are going to make that argument, there are a lot of safe spaces on reddit (almost every sub) that you can go state how you feel and people will pat you on the back and agree without putting any thought into it. \n\n\nIf you want to disagree with <PERSON>, to people who agree with him, then you have to be ready to engage in a debate beyond your feelings and use facts and back them up with sources. Most of what <PERSON> says it absolutely undeniably true and fact. And even your example of transgenders being the victim of sexual assault... that may or may not be true, I don't know because I've never looked into it. But let's assume it is, the immediate thing that comes to my mind is the behaviors I've seen the transgender people I've known engaging in (I lived in LA for over a decade and worked in many facets of the entertainment industry so saw my fair share) and I start wondering if these people were victims to the underground scenes they were indulging in, or related to drug use, etc... I don't mean offense by stating this. But the reality is that even people who know a lot of transgender people see they are often (but not always) into some seedier scenes and lifestyles that raise some questions. \n\n\nSo it's a complex thing that you are asking... but yes, sources and facts are the only thing that is going to work. Emotions aren't logical and will not be respected by themselves as an argument about anything beyond them. If I come to you and tell you that everything you believe is wrong because of how it makes me feel, I'm sure you won't really care what I have to say unless I use some facts to prove my point... right? It goes both ways.", "847" ], [ "> Also, it is incredibly condescending to have you, a cis person, try to tell me what the fuck I should care about\n\n\nSee, this is where you are going to lose every time. You are now arguing emotion, saying his opinion isn't valid. Unfortunately most of the world is not trans, and they have a certain view of it, whether you agree with them or not. The way you are arguing here, is never going to change someone's mind... it's framing yourself as a victim, and people are ridiculously sick of victim politics because the LGBT community has been acting like it's the victim olympics, where the more things you have wrong with you, the more right you have to speak. That will never win and is a big part of why <PERSON> and <PERSON> are as popular as they are. Just food for thought.", "847" ], [ "Can you show me a couple examples of fast food employees going on to own franchises later? As you are implying this is a very common thing to have happen. This is simply mathematically impossible. There is no way this can be a very common thing... statistically with a 0% turn over rate and an average staff of 20 people for a small fast food business would mean there's a 5% chance at that ever happening even when we use magical non existent probabilities of an absolutely fairy tail best case scenario assuming no turn over and that eventually every franchise would be run by someone who started out at minimum wage. \n\nQuite frankly the story you just spouted is an absolute pipe dream. \n\nHowever, in mom and pop shops, where they often pay much better than franchises this is much more common. But you are talking about a very long time of working there until the owners retiring before you get that chance, and then hope it doesn't fall down the chain through nepotism instead of you. So even where it's more likely it still isn't likely, unfortunately.", "479" ], [ "No, actually I've looked extensively into every economic model and every proposal that comes up for a vote. This isn't the first time this has come up. And, in places where the government has an actual resource to use to subsidize the program, you MIGHT have a chance of it working on a very small scale before it just causes inflation and just lands up devaluing your resources and landing back on the tax payers regardless, it'll just create a temporary buffer before you've screwed yourselves worse in that case. But in a place like the US on a large scale with our cultural problems and welfare queens, it's simply a pipe dream. It will never work. Cultures of laziness can't succeed while encouraging laziness. The government is horrible at managing resources because they have no competition and are made up of people with no experience running things efficiently, only figuring out how they can spend more and filter more into their own coffers... so it's no surprise that when they take over the means of production that it always leads to famine, genocide, and collapse.", "683" ], [ "The burqa ban is stupid anyways... people think they are banning full face coverings. It's a hollow gesture even when it passes, because it will still make it legal to cover the whole face, the burqa covers the eyes with a mesh as well. That's the only difference. So it's all just bullshit political theater. It does nothing to change anything. Just gives them all something meaningless to argue about that everyone is too ignorant about to realize it. The niqab should go too.\n\n_URL_0_", "972" ], [ "Wow, you know you lost the argument when you resort to <PERSON> is a Kenyan nonsense to make your point in an argument about economics. Nice try... but yes... I'm right, I thought it was common knowledge. According to MIT, the cost to produce the iphone in the US would cost an extra 30-40 dollars per phone... I used the 50% number so when you looked it up and saw that that it wasn't even 25% you'd realize how ridiculous you were being, but you didn't do any research, so I made the mistake of giving you more credit than do. \n\n_URL_1_\n\n_URL_0_\n\n\nAnd the problem is that we've isolated ourselves from reality by living above our means with massive amounts of credit card debt and outsourcing jobs and manufacturing because Americans would rather have a bunch of cheap shit than a few quality items they actually take care of and use that were made here locally. They aren't smart enough to realize that by shopping walmart and supporting cheap chinese knock offs you are killing the mom and pop shops that paid actual wages people could live on, because they products were higher quality and made locally by other people paid actual living wages. \n\n\nYou all want your cheap shit but you want someone else to pay for it, then complain when the adults want to help fix things for you. How many more partisan red herrings you want to bring up to avoid the fact you were wrong now?", "21" ], [ "You guys are being pretty easily fooled by this. Do you think <PERSON> kept all of <PERSON>'s guys? And if he did keep any of them on for the transition, do you think he would have if <PERSON> went full blitz and tried to delegitimize him for weeks before taking office?\n\n\nThose positions are always replaced when a new administration comes in, this is a bunch of hoopla about nothing, and a paranoid conspiracy theory. \n\n\nThis type of rhetoric is getting dangerously close to sounding like <PERSON> tier conspiracies, actually, I think it's already gone just as far in that regard... the only difference is <PERSON> followers fought peacefully from behind the scenes... you all are getting the pitchforks out, calling everyone Nazis and many calling for harm to not just the admin but his supporters. That's collective fucking lunacy. This is fucking insane how brainwashed people are by media that is all controlled by a handful of people.", "906" ], [ "He's watched the leftist media and politicians manipulate liberals for decades... and he's dealt with them himself for decades with professional PR people that know how to do so very well. Honestly manipulating the left isn't very difficult... it's more the media doing it right now trying to bash <PERSON> than <PERSON> himself. He's ordered to build the wall, shocking, <PERSON> built 700 miles during his presidency under the bill that <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON> all voted in favor for. He instituted a temporary ban on refugees (with some exemptions) which is more lax than <PERSON>'s ban was an for a shorter period of time, and was only a continuation of the ban <PERSON> ordered the nations that were a danger. <PERSON> purged the military and replaced them with his leaders from top to bottom. He's done nothing shocking, but the media want you to be outraged because they are pissed they are getting caught in their lies AND called out publicly for them. The media is using their liberal viewers as a weapon, and make no mistake it's not in your best interest, it's in theirs and theirs only. They are fighting for the establishment that everyone on the left claims to hate... but they've made you hate <PERSON> more by vile vitriolic rhetoric and protests funded by <PERSON>. It's a collective delusion perpetrated by a mass media fueled delusion. It's scary because I'm watching the left act like fascists and nazis while they accuse the other side of being that... literally. \n\nI hope everyone comes to their senses soon and you don't create some sort of self fulfilling prophecy. Because if you start attacking innocent people, for their political beliefs, they will eventually push back in self defense. The left needs to be careful that they aren't creating a problem that doesn't exist yet.", "827" ], [ "He absolutely does not oppose gay marriage. He has said for decades that he didn't have a problem with it. There's an interview from like 20 years ago where he is asked and he plays neutral when <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and every other politician were saying they disagreed with it. He said that he wasn't sure because someone from a small town may feel differently about it than someone who has lived in Manhattan most of his life (where there has long been a renowned gay community even when it wasn't very socially acceptable like it is today). \n\n\nThere's a lot of things you could choose to criticize, but don't spread blatant lies.", "418" ], [ "Of course they do. The mistake you are making is thinking I'm talking in terms of partisan politics, when I'm not, I'm an independent that happens to support <PERSON> because I despise <PERSON>. I don't care what the heritage foundation says. Global free trade is a death sentence to our economy and our workers. You want higher wages? You want economic security? Well, unfortunately we can't compete with slave wages, and when companies can move overseas and pay kids 30 cents an hour in Bangladesh to make you some cheap shit to buy at WalMart, guess what... they will, because they are businesses. Businesses main goal is to make more money... period. It's not isolationist to look out for our citizens best interest. But, in the liberal mind, anything their masters say is good and anything the republicans say is bad, regardless of truth. Flooding our country with cheap labor? AKA illegal immigrants... is absurd and ridiculous. We have laws on that for a reason, it's called sovereignty. And even with tariffs on two countries, we'd be far from isolationist and we'd stop losing businesses overseas. I work with hundreds of vendors and the amount of businesses moving large segments of their business overseas and to mexico in the NAFTA free trade zone is staggering and sad. \n\nYou've made up imaginary problems, so I don't know how to address those made up problems that don't exist... it's like saying <PERSON> can't possibly deliver gifts to everyone... and I'm saying... well <PERSON> isn't real... and your reply is that I haven't come up with a solution for how he can do it. This conversation has become absurd.", "745" ], [ "Especially after that study proving a few things:\n\n* White folks are more likely to have lethal force used against them when any amount of force is used. \n\nDespite the fact that:\n\n* Force (in general) is used more often on Black folks.\n\nSo force is used more often on Blacks, but even when you correct for population differences and the number of instances of force, white folks still encounter more lethal use of force from police officers. \n\n\nThe media can go suck a fuck for spreading lies and dividing our country.", "271" ], [ "Well, we will have to agree to disagree on illegal immigration. I don't think you realize how much money illegal immigrants remove from our economy every year. It's a deficit, but most the media wants to support the narrative to bring in more democrat voters and cheap labor. You can say it's been positive, but that's a very distorted lie told through very cherry picked statistics that ignore many other facts... it simply isn't true. You are the one sticking your head in the sand. \n\nAlso, I would ask you, what limit would you place on illegal immigrants? What standards? Education? Do they need to learn our language? Do they need to prove who they are? Could we just let in millions of poor people from China who speak no english and have no ID? Where do you draw the line on our sovereignty? Because guess what, we have laws that regulate that... but you say we need more despite us taking in more LEGALLY than most every other country does legally combined. So what is your limit? 2 million a year? 3 million a year? At some point you lose sovereignty when you change the voting demographic to a bunch of people who don't share your values, don't know or respect your laws or constitution or rights, and historically come from shit holes where they bend over for dictator regimes and cartels. So where are your lines? Nobody can ever answer this. You don't like the laws, then change them, unless you are OK with republicans ignoring laws they don't like simply because they are in charge now....\n\nAnd globalization isn't an all or nothing type of deal. We can finesse where it's in our best interest. This carte blanche style of globalization you believe in will make us all peasants at the hand of an even more polarized corporate oligarchy than we already live in. The problem is we can't compete with slave wages, and the big companies create monopolies because they can sell cheap shit from China that the Mom and Pop store can't compete with. \n\nI seriously recommend taking an economics class, there are many free courses online. \n\n\nAlso, the issue with farming in Oregon isn't an issue. It's called pay people more and they will do the work. The price of food should go up. People in the US eat too much as it is. I'd be perfectly fine with that, and then it creates a market to compete with. The main problem is that in Oregon many people can grow their own food, so they don't really have the farming market to compete with the subsidized GMOs that can be transported further. Funny, you are ok with having to compete globally, but not locally. That's how the market corrects itself... you don't flood in cheap labor to keep prices and wages low, which ironically is what your solution is. So backwards and contradictory of you to say that it's quite baffling.", "113" ], [ "haha yes, it seems obvious to most people, but if I were the defense I would argue that the reason she did this was not because they didn't normally go by the book, but to remember to be extra prudent of procedural technicalities that could be used against them that aren't always paid attention to as closely in less serious cases because they were going up against a diabolical machine.\n\nOf course I'm just playing devils advocate, I have no doubt in my mind it was simply a dumb move to create plausible deniability.", "646" ], [ "Not only that but he did it while having overhead costs. He paid thousands of people to work, paid for insurance, construction rentals, materials, management, lawyers, and created billions of dollars of tax revenue for the places he built in. He turned a million dollar lot into a millions of dollars of tax revenue a year and wealth in perpetuity. \n\nSo it's always funny when the left, who hates wallstreet because it's \"passive income\" or \"capital gains\" use that argument. OMG what an idiot, he created jobs, created tax revenue and INCREASED it by increasing the value of any building or lot he created, and brought in tons of foreign buyers brining money into our country from outside of it. He was the one person the chinese government trusted to house their official bank in his building. And created unfathomable wealth all the while... but what a lucky idiot, right? The left is seriously mentally ill.", "747" ], [ "You should look through my history before you accuse me of being a share blue shill. I just don't think using pictures that are literally 2 women eating pizza with a child after they were freed from a place where that wasn't possible is proof of some conspiracy... there's plenty of other stuff. Like the pool email... the wet works email... playing dominos on cheese or pasta... all the trips to <PERSON>'s pedo island... the fact that all those pizza shops seem to be connected and using pedo symbolism... the tweets from <PERSON> and all his perverted deranged friends... etc.... I just don't see this out of context picture as anything proving anything.", "504" ], [ "It is possible to be tested...\n\n[_URL_0_](_URL_1_)\n\nI saw an ad when I searched it for a home test, but I'm always skeptical of those as they tend to be unreliable and require confirmation from an actual lab test involving a doctor in the end anyway. So best to talk to your doctor if you think you might be at risk, though most doctors will probably err on the side of NOT testing unless you are displaying any symptoms and are not a pregnant woman or woman planning to get pregnant. \n\nFun bonus fact: Martin Shkreli was the only manufacturer of the drug used to treat this in the US.", "343" ], [ "Nah, I hung out in that industry scene for a while and saw all the different subsets. Basically it's a very small club, and it's about WHO you know more than what you know, for the most part. The main thing driving it is compatible personality types... they want people they like working with and get along with. When you sit down with these industry types just about anything goes with few exceptions... and things that might be incredibly uncomfortable for more conservative people is talked about casually with these people. They swear like Australians, talk about casual drug use as if it's nothing, make perverted and crass jokes about the \"help\" worse than any locker room talk you've ever heard. It's fuck this and fuck that every other word. There is a cocky arrogance to them all, and they love to talk shit. To fit in here, you have to be able to laugh and act natural with them while they schmuck it up talking like the degenerates they are while criticizing and gossiping like school girls. \n\nSince they hire from within, and hollywood has been a safe space for gays for a very long time... the industry has embraced a large majority in their ranks. And, when the producer says they need someone for position X... the makeup guy, or personal assistant can now recommend his friends for first dibs to get those positions. The gay community can be incredibly close knit, similar to how Jews look out for each other and prefer to hire another jew rather than a gentile if they have the choice and it makes financial sense. \\(This is not knocking either community, in fact, I think it's perfectly normal for people of all cultures to do this, even subconsciously if not consciously\\) So it's no wonder that rich jewish men with kinks found solace and friendship in gay men, who tend to be very studious workers that are not going to judge your bad behaviors, especially towards women as many gay men simply do not respect women very much, at least not behind closed doors. So the gay men see the desperate starlets as trying to sleep their way to the top, which many of them absolutely were/are... and the producers see a bunch of hard working guys that turn a blind eye as long as their own dirty deeds have a blind eye turned as well. \n\nIt's kind of hard to really put into words, not sure how well I did... but Hollywood definitely attracts the weirdos, and you have to be fairly narcissistic and driven, and also willing to turn a blind eye and just accept crazy behaviors as \"eccentric\" to make it big in that industry long term. Which is why the hashtag metoo movement is so large. All these girls that saw how it worked, how they were manipulated into thinking they'd get ahead for indulging with some guy... then realizing they were passed up for the next young girl who came along, made them angry and when they spoke up they got cast aside and buried. Now they are exacting their revenge... and probably rightfully so.", "139" ], [ "Yeah exactly. Had similar experiences in the entertainment industry with hiring. Several jobs that I landed were because the interviewer though I was gay for similar reasons, also the fact I worked in a place previously that was pretty much the same ratio as you described so was really comfortable conversing around that personality type as many of my best friends at the time were very similar in nature.", "979" ], [ "I don't think nuclear war is their first option, but that's probably a back up option like the sampson option for israel. Those in power don't want to let go, and would rather burn it all to the ground rather than give up their power. More likely these sick fucks would use a plague... and right now a new ebola plague has sprung up in the congo and already killed 17 people. There was the pneumonic plague in madagascar a month or two ago, haven't heard much about that lately though... probably because the media doesn't want to publicize a legitimate excuse for new travel bans that they know <PERSON> would implement.", "1014" ], [ "In this video they are mostly lamenting that they are being forced back. One guy says he got deported because the US citizens were tired of the crime inflicted on innocent citizens and the harm they caused. Other gang members are lamenting having to come back to be possibly killed by the police while talking about how they kill people themselves just for wandering into their \"territory\". Meanwhile the guys that are \"laughing\" are in El Salvador in hiding, covering their faces, ducking away from cops, and living in the run down outskirts of town calling <PERSON> crazy. Nothing in this video supports the headline and I'm honestly embarrassed for Vice news because they used to have some really good segments, but they've fallen so far since then.", "799" ], [ "No, termination of the deal is horrible for the Iranian elite. Sanctions are coming back, they will be unable to do business with American companies and likely soon any of our allies that wish to remain allies. Unfortunately the deal already freed 100s of billions of dollars for them to use that was frozen before the deal. Then they got that nice ransom payment in unmarked bills delivered by the O admin and company as a bonus. It is bad for the globalist elites that wanted to rake in that money from purchases, and now the squeeze is coming unless they renegotiate a better deal. That's why they are so pissed, they know shit just got real for them again.", "985" ] ]
95
[ 15283, 5035, 16522, 17625, 13666, 7047, 18546, 17759, 1352, 5348, 6672, 2533, 6041, 15104, 5216, 3676, 11455, 10303, 10185, 1851, 10715, 3821, 5917, 25508, 9938, 11888, 23685, 1045, 1858, 13029, 22919, 5735, 8281, 10874, 15963, 6277, 23712, 1704, 17700, 18349, 23351, 915, 2403, 13938, 19245, 11074, 16099, 21885, 20332, 15935, 4062, 21590, 20039, 24950, 6303, 16278, 8973, 25205, 9571, 16244, 25037, 7878, 19050, 11496, 493, 6075, 23779, 21932, 4971, 17466, 21426, 20330, 6258, 11928, 2436, 11133, 9525, 2651, 22744, 25108, 23023, 2127, 19425, 21595, 22688, 1462, 7516, 16786, 12090, 14855, 15701, 660, 19256, 4163, 16020, 7539, 6026, 3501, 16173, 3714, 23163, 7807, 4844, 22149, 13770, 10011, 16611, 12931, 2280, 1024, 23577, 2832, 5037, 4743, 18003, 25268, 4262, 639, 2105, 24275, 4949, 24046, 5672, 7954, 14100, 6272, 10376, 61, 15866, 21667, 21758, 25049, 16510, 4132, 11773, 6741, 12877, 11443, 17131, 17643, 25021, 14972, 23792, 13581, 23116, 16387, 1896, 21023, 15401, 18230, 10700, 24093, 25166, 3828, 4876, 22453, 17883, 20368, 1594, 20780, 24868, 10765, 14356, 24693, 21064, 14139, 453, 8896, 3029, 2170, 479, 11811, 13335, 3355, 21036, 9539, 14598, 18301, 3618, 9041, 10785, 19234, 22244, 5191, 22366, 12578, 15890, 7613, 21183, 15554, 5143, 11664, 4313, 9393, 1165, 6671, 6178, 16104, 22022, 21420, 13594, 8930, 15255, 24314, 19330, 23135, 13179, 20801, 16286, 10898, 16475, 16951, 21190, 17656, 18263, 21843, 9719, 23054, 13400, 9134, 3785, 20970, 21522, 25099, 25544, 15555, 14597, 22814, 15707, 13411, 24043, 20455, 12549, 2633, 9677, 14753, 3241, 13625, 18072, 14164, 621, 23810, 19223, 7904, 19792, 17465, 21674, 2507, 14177, 24651, 14676, 10907, 8980, 11046, 18523, 13208, 20460, 7923, 16756, 4053, 19095, 12347, 23715, 10565, 11991, 12034, 25067, 11626, 8927, 9873, 12426, 6305, 13822, 4836, 21038, 13246, 15092, 22370, 21983, 6503, 16022, 11215, 12744, 3767, 3564, 24503, 1535, 3310, 1892, 19113, 19916, 19974, 8871, 10614, 18052, 1625, 3009, 2708, 1499, 17802, 9319, 10176, 18196, 21151, 9194, 17847, 1254, 8732, 22850, 18031, 4787, 17043, 5155, 15758, 9697, 5390, 3964, 14503, 18718, 1526, 2125, 12581, 357, 5939, 8151, 21723, 22, 4948, 4711, 6910, 6335, 7629, 22560, 18535, 18329, 24211, 10702, 13262, 1425, 14555, 12846, 15366, 3747, 22567, 24891, 7995, 6291, 22360, 8770, 13608, 10437, 16290, 5122, 9771, 9208, 20097, 20765, 4136, 3988, 1327, 18477, 7609, 4152, 4329, 5804, 13184, 25034, 8186, 6256, 20610, 24141, 6452, 13483, 11777, 12245, 8144, 23440, 14951, 6310, 7920, 22176, 5555, 14490, 11192, 6608, 3753, 9245, 14821, 11016, 13341, 10776, 10681, 24734, 17421, 11902, 3287, 25020, 1884, 6187, 11386, 22275, 15563, 1570, 25356, 19348, 13701, 12355, 15505, 7740, 11636, 6058, 7038, 11965, 4004, 1799, 4362, 12626, 9512, 13238, 10497, 10857, 25156, 13142, 16152, 21395, 10576, 40, 13416, 339, 14201, 1073, 29, 6991, 3829, 7404, 24343, 11289, 23029, 13348, 9724, 23898, 17342, 9665, 14920, 4263, 2748, 19514, 887, 2441, 8502, 2363, 5260, 9373, 23700, 18945, 21137, 22949, 2134, 25276, 3662, 17209, 23687, 1203, 15615, 9463, 4238, 15083, 5655, 21446, 20256, 25207, 18047, 14552, 14460, 16447, 13534, 14710, 441, 8108, 3638, 25299, 2287, 752, 7677, 12793, 633, 5747, 19389, 79, 17397, 332, 23902, 25358, 2970, 15585, 3711, 7451, 18117, 16399 ]
reddit_dump_09Klr650
[ [ "Sorry, I made it confusing. I was making two points. The first is that you were saying \"well it works like this somewhere else\", and I was trying to point out that just because it works like that elsewhere does not mean it works like that here.\n\nStill let us look into this further. How large was that bar? Did the band sell merchandise? How expensive were the drinks?", "957" ], [ "I am not getting \"defensive\". i am getting upset that you are basically saying \"Oh, they are not well known and therefore should work for free\". And just because other places do not have cover for bars with live bands does not mean you were not paying for the band there. They are getting paid one way or another. Higher drink prices/etc. \n\nStill we have an opportunity here. Call up your old bosses/coworkers/etc and ask how and what the bands were paid.", "973" ], [ "> Basically the bars here have pawned off paying for entertainment on you and you're ok with it. \n\nActually I am. Because I have no want or need to go to bars with loud music I can drink in peace. With drinks that have not had the prices inflated to cover the cost of a band. So I am NOT paying extra for the privilege of NOT being disturbed. Win-win. \n\nOn the other hand if I wanted to drink at any of those bars YOU apparently worked at? I would be paying for the bands. Even on the days they were not there as no bar owner is going to change prices around daily.", "973" ], [ "No I am not \"closed minded\". The fact that someone operating in any other way than the way YOU have done it in the past upset you? Pretty much the definition of \"closed minded\". \n\nWhat you are saying is that you had your services priced high enough to cover those additional costs. In other words you were charging customers who were there on nights with no live entertainment, and with no wish to see live entertainment, for that entertainment.\n\nIf I want live entertainment I will pay for it. And in the past I have. I gladly dropped well over $100 to see <PERSON> last week. But that was MY choice.", "618" ], [ "You already have a lighting circuit serving the room? You could use the same circuit if it is not heavily loaded. Find out where the nearest unswitched hot and neutral are (probably in one of the lights in the room) and extend it over to the new lights. Running the hot leg through the switch. It is hard to give exact advice as how your circuits are run, where the lights are located, how easy it is to run wiring above ceiling, etc. can vary.", "333" ], [ "What sort of lighting do you have in the room? And getting the circuit from the other switches may not be that easy as they probably only have the hot there. You would still need to pick up the neutral as well. Honestly ANY unswitched circuit with sufficient capacity would work. For instance how many receptacle circuits do you have in the area? Any lightly loaded ones? That is, circuits with receptacles that are either unused or only have small loads. \n\nNow this is the easy way. The proper way may be to run a new circuit. I expect all your existing circuits are not AFCI/GFCI protected as required under recent electrical codes across most (but not all) of the country.", "1006" ], [ "As others have pointed out, if you are concerned you can replace the plug. Not as easy as replacing a cordset, but not difficult. \n\nThat being said you would be surprised just how many \"grounded\" receptacles do not have a clear ground path. Personally I say if you are a little worried: Don't use it when wet (you or the laptop), don't use it on a well-grounded surface (metal table tops, wet floors, etc) and don't use it in unpolarized outlets. If you are *really* worried don't use it while charging. You should be fine.", "1006" ], [ "Both are commodities created from natural \"public\" resources. In this case BOTH are procured at the seller's expense. Processed at the seller's expense. Transported at the seller's expense. So how are they not equivalent? \n\n > Second, I specifically pointed to Nestlè's practice of literally bottling municipal tap as what I object to.\n\nI see. So you are upset at them HERE . . . because of something they did elsewhere? You object to them getting \"free\" water HERE . . . because they pay for tap water elsewhere? Can you \"clear\" this up a little more? Because they are not bottling tap water here. They are bottling there own well water. I mean it's right in the title! \"Outrage ensues as Michigan grants Nestlé permit to **extract** 200,000 gallons of water per day\"", "31" ], [ "Again you and others are getting upset over *something else entirely*. Let me ask you this. If a man went to trial and all evidence said he was innocent but some of the jurors decided to convict based on other deeds the person may have done in the past, is that justice? Or because they did not like the man? \n\nAnd it is not \"fish and **tap** water\". It is \"fish and **well** water\". Nestle is procuring, treating and shipping this water AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE. No government money, infrastructure, etc. is involved. You keep trying to make it out like the government is GIVING treated municipal water to Nestle. They are not. Nestle just requested to be allowed to increase pumping slightly at one of their well locations because the other is contaminated due to the rising water table hitting chemicals from MUNICIPAL FIREWORKS.", "31" ], [ "You are absolutely right. This is not a trial. it is an old-school lynching. Not just for the south anymore. Want to complain about Nestle? By all means go ahead. But why act like what they are doing here is either illegal or immoral? It is neither. \n\nIf the majority of people are so upset why not get the law changed? Just because there are a some vocal people out there does not mean they are the majority. Or even in the right. But I do love your logic. I suppose if Nestle wanted to open a home for orphaned kittens a lot of these people will still be foaming at the mouth and complaining. \"Why did Nestle ignore the puppies? Don't they care about all the bunnies? What's that, Nestle is killing puppies and bunnies? Burn down the building!\".", "281" ], [ "Sometime late last year I heard \"over one thousand\" residential have been replaced. Undoubtedly a lot more now. I am sure they have a timeline but there are always bottlenecks for such massive projects. Number of crews available, materials, timing of disruption to existing water, sewer, gas, electric, telecommunications systems, etc. You cannot just go in and dig all over the place and replace 30K lines all at the same time. Not unless you want to shut the entire city down for half a year!", "69" ], [ "Clickbait data. If you researched further you would find that they seized far more than that. That \"104k\" of guns were just the ones with serial numbers submitted to the US BATFE for tracing. In other words guns they thought MAY HAVE come from the US and therefore submitted to us for additional information. Definitely biased towards a false positive there. Nice try though. So no, Mexico has NOT been successful. And neither has any other country with a border like ours. \n\nSo before you start making such claims explain to me, with the BILLIONS we spend on drug interdiction, we still have THOUSANDS of tons coming into the US per year? Then explain why guns will be any different? \n\nFurthermore there was ONE legal gun store in Mexico. Hardly supportive of your comments regarding their rights to gun ownership!", "356" ], [ "I love how the headline makes the US sounds like monsters, when the BODY of the article has gems like this:\n\n\"Since the policy shift, more than 680 Cuban \"irregular migrants\" have been deported in total from various countries, <PERSON> wrote, including more than 400 from Mexico, 117 from the Bahamas and 39 from the Cayman Islands. \"\n\nBut of course Mexican immigration policy (and their abuse) cannot be discussed.", "356" ], [ "And is it not reasonable to make \"reasonable accommodations\" for vehicles? The Feds already mandates so many other features for automobiles, why not that? You are basically demanding that a company lose a LOT of profit, either by opening a walk-up window that very few would use (because if it was such an area they would have provided one in the first place) or close early.\n\nAnd I am pretty sure the reason your local McDs closes the drive-thru at that time is that experience has shown them they do not get enough customers to warrant the expense. Refer to comment above about that.", "257" ], [ "Still trying to change the subject? Well then. The pipeline is SAFER than the current alternative (rail cars) It is NOT on \"tribal\" lands. The tribe KNEW about it in advance. And these so-called \"activists\" BROKE the law and TRASHED the environment.\n\nSo explain to me what rights are \"of the people\" are an issue here. The right to misrepresent this as a tribal sovereign land issue? The right to demand we use less safe means to transport the oil we depend upon? Or the right for people to break the law, trespass and litter because they were supporting the \"cause of the month\"? And you are right, I do seem to be \"not very American\" because I refuse to allow people to do whatever they please just to be PC.", "233" ], [ "No. But requiring companies to incur massive losses in profit to accommodate the very few might. But some people are always willing to spend OTHER people's money. Now tell me, why not also require all new houses be handicap accessible? Because the next owner MIGHT be handicapped? Reasonable accommodation and all of that. How about requiring EXISTING houses? But that would be YOUR money, wouldn't it? What people seem to be missing is that they ARE providing equal access to all pedestrians.\n\nJust curious, do you realize that most drive-up ATM machines are not capable of being used by blind people? All the braille aside only the hardware for many ATMs are blind-ready. The voice prompts/software is not. Where is the outcry over that? Instead it is discrimination because they are not serving walk-up customers wanting a burger after lobby hours?", "499" ], [ "That's a laugh. \"Surplus value\"? It is a symbiotic relationship. By hurting their employer they are also hurting themselves.\n\nTake an economics course. Pay special attention to producer and consumer surplus and what it entails. In this case the companies (consumer) are paying what market forces make the workers (producer) accept as wages. Is there such as thing as consumer surplus? That can companies pay more? Of course. But there is the corresponding producer surplus as well. Reducing one reduces the other (usually through ill though out government taxes or minimum/maximum price floors). By your logic workers are also stealing from the companies by accepting higher wages than other workers would have accepted (producer surplus).", "231" ], [ "As unpopular as this will make me I will say this. As far as I am concerned there needs to be a limit to the number of times narcan should be used on an individual. Say, two times per year. At that point we must accept the individual is on a self-destructive path and admit that there is really nothing we can do. \n\nNow before everyone gets too upset I also believe that narcan use should also automatically initiate a one week \"hold for physical and mental evaluation\" period. This would eliminate the possibility of an immediate repeat of the overdose and allow people to get the help they need. After two cycles of this? Well see above.", "615" ], [ "Gets better, from Wikipedia:\n > The highest quality tea is made by boiling the tea leaves in water for half a day, achieving a dark brown color. It is then skimmed, and poured into a cylinder with fresh yak butter and salt which is then shaken. The result is a purplish liquid that is about the thickness of a stew or thick oil. It is then poured into clay tea-pots, or jars, that resemble Japanese teapots. > \n\nAs thick as stew? I mean, I like a strong cup every now and then but still that's a little too much for me.", "1002" ], [ "Sorry but the rot is coming from you. It is symbiotic because neither can survive without the other. However you seem to have the typical fixation \"all companies are evil\" mentality.\n\nAnd you totally missed my point regarding surplus. As I said, take an economics course (or at least look at the wikipedia page). You will look less like a complete fanatic and idiot. Still it is good you showed your \"true colors\" by your rant regarding capitalism. Care to show us a successful example of an alternative system?", "101" ] ]
415
[ 23626, 23637, 21725, 7610, 1238, 20925, 23755, 17584, 16487, 22476, 19126, 19241, 5009, 20617, 21291, 24093, 9599, 5787, 15168, 5330, 22096, 16693, 22945, 13851, 7058, 7440, 17144, 5260, 20991, 24635, 24120, 20729, 8812, 2272, 14733, 18617, 22201, 24953, 10804, 9539, 23292, 18031, 16806, 8613, 8157, 6026, 15209, 2129, 7992, 14446, 13757, 9571, 12949, 2796, 11041, 3180, 797, 19797, 9851, 1845, 1990, 10510, 15839, 23163, 23861, 4147, 22825, 14147, 3532, 18007, 9792, 416, 25124, 16475, 5723, 11126, 4129, 15920, 2242, 24313, 15043, 17358, 514, 17399, 7674, 17067, 14429, 18387, 23759, 11236, 5038, 7443, 14579, 21494, 23901, 20317, 24284, 6877, 7635, 23107, 2975, 18632, 16444, 6277, 22496, 392, 6522, 22188, 22713, 8819, 14306, 1237, 2983, 10640, 25312, 21366, 8534, 20219, 21271, 13050, 21134, 3003, 20000, 25126, 14859, 3074, 5952, 17513, 2090, 16131, 5040, 22134, 20224, 7473, 19455, 14620, 24211, 352, 18012, 2737, 6804, 25147, 20776, 24734, 22241, 22032, 10357, 1435, 15083, 7057, 19234, 17614, 24217, 2651, 7932, 8737, 11226, 14220, 25066, 14944, 15516, 19691, 17519, 10797, 12948, 17365, 21143, 11245, 20823, 8817, 15241, 11994, 8610, 2787, 4824, 13972, 5063, 11837, 15310, 24314, 3054, 21885, 21375, 14799, 7816, 6949, 5960, 17979, 9110, 3671, 5727, 10671, 17226, 17418, 6667, 13751, 2019, 13904, 12001, 10931, 19610, 14448, 16584, 16073, 10958, 19026, 16916, 20999, 4521, 17716, 2641, 8327, 10755, 8734, 20976, 10832, 23214, 18772, 16447, 7908, 22857, 5750, 11721, 10702, 2633, 5463, 23338, 20332, 12597, 8558, 23487, 1355, 8698, 23977, 14885, 8470, 19351, 11942, 10006, 20491, 25385, 16845, 14124, 14875, 16337, 21674, 21261, 19425, 10495, 14277, 12409, 11109, 15821, 8592, 4009, 20132, 6082, 5828, 5278, 2979, 20531, 4969, 19459, 877, 20001, 6427, 9964, 12964, 5881, 10296, 12476, 17737, 83, 20927, 18405, 17497, 20460, 10868, 16392, 8902, 24188, 13023, 14465, 21986, 17762, 21118, 15367, 23687, 8619, 7636, 7946, 11020, 5288, 12338, 21321, 2110, 2107, 18651, 21404, 25000, 15113, 11499, 9980, 13545, 17788, 3296, 5976, 2557, 17469, 20307, 10431, 8607, 4707, 5518, 13578, 22482, 13778, 23339, 9292, 20986, 19628, 12382, 19213, 25338, 20024, 22696, 2716, 5835, 4307, 15092, 5584, 3529, 13802, 2915, 11362, 11097, 16750, 17355, 16411, 19678, 7175, 15228, 145, 25265, 19663, 13756, 10176, 511, 17599, 18196, 12105, 16569, 11555, 19789, 14201, 25341, 20603, 5068, 842, 19679, 18178, 11691, 17306, 18090, 9045, 6317, 14655, 22254, 8861, 4060, 1812, 25070, 10766, 17559, 7677, 24064, 1109, 21894, 14824, 7995, 21916, 5258, 1608, 23820, 20392, 21238, 24364, 11183, 22050, 16305, 9150, 13400, 5219, 13013, 14754, 17675, 15400, 8514, 7075, 1172, 14597, 18711, 4889, 8343, 13953, 2681, 22990, 10544, 20794, 12, 2366, 578, 9733, 22014, 18399, 5188, 11052, 24873, 9270, 2345, 9578, 8454, 791, 21884, 10314, 11720, 17881, 17048, 1713, 14931, 14163, 19114, 11622, 363, 11313, 79, 22804, 6841, 9172, 16540, 19165, 21000, 25482, 17421, 5290, 8080, 18447, 16068, 22271, 20225, 9410, 10681, 7909, 18345, 9938, 15202, 3138, 2507, 10712, 23854, 2592, 4163, 7073, 9355, 15403, 11293, 1312, 24862, 20464, 11186, 4139, 3256, 24126, 9377, 19702, 5383, 1535, 8096, 7530, 20950, 11225, 10056, 9968, 9759, 19759, 15413, 13576, 10785, 16442, 21829, 15902, 21283, 8384, 14290, 18778, 10716, 17639, 1944, 12112 ]
reddit_dump_0GameDos0
[ [ "I am trying to get a general idea of power ranking in the overall fate universe. How would you categorise the following servants from SS to D if they are fighting at 100% of their power. \n\nFor example, <PERSON> takes his oponent seriously, <PERSON> stops sealing his powers (I heard he doesnt use his full power for some reason).\n\n<PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> with <PERSON>, <PERSON> (using EA at full power), <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>.\n\nEDIT: Also <PERSON>.", "456" ], [ "I managed to max out my main roster using embers we got from the <PERSON> event. As for the rest, asfter I finished America, I have nowhere else to send my AP so I just do 40 ap exp dailies a couple of times each day.\n\nMy advice is to focus on one or two servants. I just finished maxing <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON> as they are event servants in the upcoming event.\n\nI still need to get enough mats to ascend <PERSON> and get him from 60 to _URL_0_ I save all archer embers and use the rest on <PERSON> as I managed to get her to NP2 recently.", "395" ], [ "I am currently using my own NP2 Fran. Fully buffed, she can deal around 500k-600k single target damage to each of the three enemies. \n\nThe rest of <PERSON>'s hp is taken before I NP as Fran can do around 70k damage per unbuffed buster card.\n\nI am using 1 MLB carp ,1 normal Carp and putting a MLB ushi ce on fran. The other 2 servants have gourd drop CE on along with the support I use.", "913" ], [ "IMO it goes like this\n\nEvent CE > Materials (rarest first) > Mana Prisms > Fou/Gold exp > Silver Exp > Monuments (or skip entirely and go straight to QP)\n\nIf you want to level the JttW servants ( <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, Medusa) then embers would be of a higher priority than fous. If you have no servants you want to level then fous are more important.\n\nAs for MP, we need 10k to MLB the two upcoming shop CEs. Add to that the price of the mana shop tickets and fous and you discover that having some mana prisms around is handy.", "910" ], [ "<PERSON> is known as the strongest boss-killer among all silver servants. His NP damage can even exceed alot of SSRs.\n\n<PERSON> fits in a quick crit team which is way weaker than a buster crit or arts spam-fest team. And <PERSON> is more of a support rather than a bosskiller.\n\nThey can be leveled later, but <PERSON> should be the first ST Archer anyone levels IMO.\n\nI have been playing for a long while now. I used <PERSON> once during the KnK event to dodge <PERSON>'s NP, and only finished leveling him yesterday as he is an event servants for the JttW event.\n\nEDIT:Also, with everyone on most support lists having a waver it is far more optimal to level a damage dealer instead of a support like <PERSON>.", "456" ], [ "~~Not really IMO, she got a crap-load of buff on her and still barely did 750k damage even though she has NP5.~~ As for spamming NP , a crit-arts servant like <PERSON> or <PERSON> are quite better at that.\n\nSo unless I am missing out on something, the only thing making <PERSON> stand out is her multi-hit NP. And even then , assuming you are not a whale, you wont be getting the same spam potential as seen in that video.\n\nBut that's just my opinion.\n\nEDIT: Scratch some of the things I said, I just noticed that he didnt use any event CEs.Still though, with that much buffing and NP5, that damage isnt that strange.", "354" ], [ "They are both archers, but the shop for purple currency unlocks by second week (Euryale gives bonus for purple lotus currency), meaning that the first week she wouldnt be that useful IMO.\n\nBut, the nodes you will be farming wont have sabers, meaning <PERSON> will either be doing Neutral or half damage to enemies.\n\nSo, if you dont have any decent damage dealers , go with <PERSON>. Otherwise , go for <PERSON> as he will help your damage dealer survive and do more damage.\n\n\nNote: Like <PERSON> and <PERSON> , <PERSON> and Euryale give bonus for the same currency. If you manage to get <PERSON> ,I suggest leveling her instead of Euryale to expand your roster.\n\nAlso, the node with best drops for Lotuses has three caster enemies in the final battle, meaning an AoE rider like <PERSON> will be quite helpful.", "97" ], [ "I disagree with /u/D13G00.\n\nIirc, the purple lotus shop only gets unlocked around the second week, meaning that Euryale wouldnt be that helpful for people who are farming. Add to that that there arent many saber enemies in any of the nodes, a damage dealer like <PERSON> will be ignored IMO in favour of a support servant like <PERSON>.\n\nThe node with the strongest saber enemy is for farming golden pills which means <PERSON> wont be giving any bonus to drops.People *might* still use her, but that's just because her niche and not because she is an event servant.I'd rather use an AoE like <PERSON> from the support list for that node myself.\n\nFor the second week, most people will use medusa as the node with best purple lotus drops has three casters in the final battle thus making an AoE rider more useful than a ST archer.\n\n_____________________________________________________________________________\n*Disclaimer: I respect the opinions of others and use my right to disagree in full belief that my conjunctures are true. If anything I say is false, please inform me so that I can retract any statements based on it.*", "395" ], [ "I know that, I played both BL1 and 2 on PC and BL:TPS on Xbox360 before.\n\nBut I never played with the intent of going to NG+ before. I only relied on luck and used whatever gear I got.\n\nLegendary loot midgets drop gear, do normal ones not drop any? I tried farming the Doc's orders quest , but it seems that method only works on TVHM and UVHM.", "910" ], [ "We still have some time before the next welfare servant event comes around. And those events usually tend to not be very hard.\n\nI started the KnK event with a handful of servants all lower than level 30, yet managed to NP5 <PERSON> and get all daggers.\n\nSo I think that ,as long as you play smart, you shouldnt have much problems. But try leveling some damage dealers during the time we have left.\n\nHere is the wiki page for the Rider Kintoki event:\n\n_URL_0_", "668" ], [ "> If you get into a sexual relationship, think of the problems it may cause. The girl may get pregnant, and you most likely would leave her. \n\nMost likely? Dude, any decent person would stick around and take responsibility. What kind of a holes do you think we are?\n\n > Imagine if your parents walks in on you and the girl. What will you do? \n\nMake it halal and force them to marry us.\n\n > Lower your gaze and avoid porn. \n\nYou know how hard that is for people not living in a place such as saudi arabia?\n\n > Don't talk to girls unless it's for work. \n\nI know a single girl from school, and I still have thoughts.", "209" ], [ "> I can see the wisdom in it.\n\nWould YOU see more wisdom than <PERSON> and the <PERSON>?\n\n > All lot of teens are REALLY imature. \n\nThat isnt an excuse. Dont western people have sex and relationships when still young? Are they smarter than muslims?\n\n > Plus, how are things going to work out financially? \n\nLike it works for couples, you move in together, rent, and both work part time while studying.", "881" ], [ "> It seems like every guy nowadays, no matter how normal from outside, indulges in following inappropriate Instagram accounts, watching porn and non-porn filthy movies. \n\nMaybe if society didnt force us to wait until we are in our mid/late twenties to get married like how the <PERSON> advised this wouldnt be an issue no?\n\nMen, unlike women, dont have the privilege of being able to marry younger.\n\nAs for \"red flags\", if he tries to discuss stuff like that, asks for severa pictures,etc. that might be super sus.", "70" ], [ "> Try living in Saudi Arabia. \n\nI did, for 10 years. If only they gave the nationality :/\n\nI plan on trying to go back there after college for a job.\n\n > A lot of my Pakistani and Indian friends have been attacked my the locals there. I know people from Bangladesh who were called \"dogs\" by their employers. \n\nAnd this doesnt happen in various parts of Europe? And America? Xenophobia is everywhere.\n\n > I prefer a democracy over a monarch. \n\nNot all Muslim majority countries are monarchies.\n\n > I want to be able to choose my leader\n\nGuess this shows your priorities huh, good luck raising your kids properly in such environment", "680" ], [ "Here is the deal, if I dont support killing homeless people, why would I support killing fetuses of poor people? \n\nLike, you might see a fetus as a parasite or whatever fucked up dehumanised version of life you guys use to justify termination, but to us a fetus is the same as a baby which is the same as a child which is the same as an adult in terms of human value.\n\nPeople dont accidentaly get pregnant, they have sex which makes them pregnant. Women dont just slip and fall on penises. Responsible sex INCLUDES preparing yourself to take care of a baby.\n\nIf we all stopped having kids until we find a cure to every disease, we would die off before that happened.\n\nAlso, \"you shouldve been all aborted\"? Why dont you take it a step further and go around shooting pro lifers? Since you care so little about life.", "626" ], [ "Dude, respect. This sub is sorta also against people trying to spread watered down versions of faith. We follow God on his terms, not ours.\n\n > but I notice there seems to be \"liberal\" Muslim mosques near me too. \n\nThere is a god forsaken reddit called progressive_islam. I go there every once in a while to hurt myself.\n\n > If I can't find any it's like I shouldn't even show up for Jumah salat at a mosque?\n\nFor prayer, if there is no proper mosque nearby, you can go to such mosques and try your best not to stand next to someone of the opposite sex (I heard some mosques have men and women in the same row touching shoulders). If you are talking about speeches, just listen but pay them no heed since you already know what agenda they are trying to push. Same as in certain Islamic countries (Saudi for example) the rulers might pay the imams to praise them in their speech. You know what is kind of sad? Back in the day in Egypt, the imam once tried to praise the king during his speech. The speaker of Al Azhar (most prestigious Islamic institute in the world) was there and got mad, he let the people pray, then after that he went up and ordered the people to start prayer again as the imam was declared a hypocrite. That imam was then prosecuted and lost his qualifications. That is how much respect people had for Islam at some point, not even the king was above it. Now imams are bootlickers to government (in the east) and to liberal agenda (in the west).\n\n\nDont take opinions from those people, go to websites such as islamqa and islamweb for your questions.", "293" ], [ "> homophobic \n\nExplain, exactly, how is that \"indecent\"? Is anything you dont agree with indecent?\n\n > and incredibly sexist, just like the Bible. \n\nMost definitely not.\n\n > The women have to be obedient to their husbands, \n\nAnd the husbands are responsible for serving their wives and their households. And the mother has a higher position and authority than the father.\n\n > their word is worth half of a man's word in court. \n\nIncorrect interpretation. If the trial is regarding a BUSINESS dealing, 2 women are needed, but only ONE testifies. Not both women.\n\n > how a woman on her period is sickly.\n\nAnyone who is bleeding is considered impure. If you are bleeding from a wound for example. Periods also are NOT just blood, but tissues as well. And the Quran exempts women from praying during that time to make things easy for them. Literally one of the very few exemptions from prayer. Someone who is fully paralyzed is still not exempt from prayer.\n\n > many Christians and Muslims don't do that \n\nThat is a very stupid statement. A good Muslim follows Islam, someone who doesnt is a bad Muslim. Someone who disagrees is an apostate. No longer a Muslim.", "589" ], [ "This is a strawman. No one thinks they will be forced to have their way with women. Physical contact with the opposite gender can definitely be inappropriate and tempt people. Doesnt mean it will make them rape them. Same as stopping by a shop to look at stuff I cant afford doesnt mean I will rob it. Some cultures avoid that by making clear distinct separations between genders. Literally how many people (men) reacted after the metoo wave.", "454" ], [ "Sooooo, you, hate hatred?\n\nSounds like indecency to me. \n\nPeople can hate lots of stuff. Are people who hate incest indecent? Some people are ok with 1st cousin marriage (which increases risk by only 1-2% fyi). Others are not. Are people who are not ok with incest indecent? What about sibling marriage? If they are infertile or gay? Am I indecent for hating that?\n\nJust want to see where you stand.", "16" ], [ "> Why does God give us free will if He doesn’t want us to use it?\n\nHe gave us a choice, and free will. We choose good, we earn our reward. We choose bad, we earn our punishment.\n\n > Why doesn’t the God of love want us to have sex with more than one person?\n\nSex is meant to be within the confines of marriage. We are not beasts to only think of lust, but of compassion and love and use sex to channel those within a bond of commitment, marriage.\n\n > sex (the ultimate form of love)\n\nSo motherly love can just take the back seat huh?\n\n > Why are we forced to suppress the sex drive we get at such a young age until we’re married?\n\nWell, this isnt purely religious. Simple, society views marriage as a bigger decision than sex. In a society where it is normal for people to marry younger, this wouldnt be an issue. But now it takes a certain level of maturity to take care of a family that we have to wait until latter to get married.\n\n > Why do we even have a sex drive at such a young age? Why do men produce 1500 sperm cells a second instead of it being in perfect harmony with the female body? \n\nBecause, throughout history, people lived in various conditions which made it useful to be able to have kids younger.\n\n > Why are females able to have children at an age where they’re not able to take care of it?\n\nIt hasnt always been the case that the mother took care of the kids. Neighbors, family, community used to help raise kids.", "589" ], [ "Third trimester should ONLY be performed if the chance of saving the mother is higher than saving the child. REGARDLESS of how common they are, they should not be allowed to be performed based on the request of the parents. ONLY in a situation where you either lose the baby or the mother AND the baby is more risky to save.\n\nMOST abortions done are ones of convenience. People not wanting kids or not thinking that they cant pay their bills. And if you think people would rather be dead than poor, you are subhuman.", "674" ], [ "> The muslims from childhood are taught that every muslim is their brother and non muslims are sub humans who need to convert or face death in worst possible way. \n\nYeeeeeeah, that isnt why. Non Muslims lived under Muslim rule for years. Bar some rulers, they were allowed to practice their religion and had a certain level of autonomy. They had to pay taxes cause they werent obliged to fight wars as such (if they chose to join the army they didnt need to as far as I remember).\n\n > The Jihad which is form of war against non believers is waged in France\n\nOooof, again. Jihad means struggle. Major jihad is fighting against the self, minor jihad is military struggle.\n\n > The radical muslims kill and do terrorist attacks while the non radical ones keep quite and feel good about it(praise the attacker). \n\nA hindu mouthpiece for the far right I see.\n\n > That's why muslim community isn't taking action. They are feeling proud of the attacker (but won't admit).\n\nSo Muslims are in the loving-terrorists closet?\n\n > Also muslim immigrants can't mix with secular European societies due to their mental conditioning of hating non muslims.\n\nOr maybe because all of the discrimination? But sure, go on\n\n > I KNOW I SOUND LIKE A BIGOT\n\nGood, you are self aware", "293" ], [ "> You didn't read or purposefully ignored their slaughter of non Islamic people.\n\nYet I said:\n\n > Bar some rulers\n\n > Modern day jihad is taken as war against west ( US and it's allies)\n\nThe opposite, modern day jihad for most Muslims is fight against temptation and sin\n\n > Tell me why Islamic French muslims haven't Criticized the attack.? Why are they silent.\n\nWho says they havent? And who says them saying anything will help? France has clearly shown that it doesnt care about whether or not you are an extremist, if you are a Muslim, you are an enemy.\n\n > Europe is least discriminating place on Earth. People are aware and educated there.\n\nHow many women in hijab get bricks thrown at them in other places? How many pregnant women are attacked in other places for wearing the hijab? Are you really saying Europe is the least discriminating place for Muslims?", "293" ], [ "> I think you can argue for third trimester being problematic, \n\nOh, so we deciding the value of life based on how much trouble getting rid of it is? How about we kill homeless people then huh? That would solve several problems.\n\n > Second? Not at all.\n\nBased on what exactly?\n\n > Generally at birth.\n\nSo, if a baby is about to be delivered, should the mother be allowed to abort it then? It hasnt been birthed yet, so it isnt human /s\n\n > Sapience \n\nWhich has been lacking in your reply and rational.\n\n > pragmatism\n\nWhich is a terrible approach to judge human life.", "626" ], [ "I am not a woman, but those can be answered by any Muslim.\n\n > What’s the different between a Muslim and a hijabi? I’ve seen the word in the media but I’m not sure what it means.\n\nA Muslim is someone who follows the religion of Islam. A hijabi is someone who wears the hijab (headscarf) which could be a muslim or no muslim\n\n > What does allahu akbar mean?\n\nIt is actually Allah Akbar, but it is pronounced Allahu Akbar.\n\nAllah = The God. Al = \"The\" in Arabic, \"Ilah\"=God in Arabic. Put together it is abbreviated to Allah. It is the name of God Muslims worship. He has several other names such as The Merciful, The Creator, etc.\n\nAkbar means greatest.\n\n > Are women you wear hijabs allowed to wear wigs? \n\nNo, wigs are banned in Islam. Perhaps bald women can wear them, but you would have to ask a scholar about that.\n\n > I couldn’t tell you why I’m wondering this, brain just wonders.\n\nProbably because jewish women can use wigs to cover their hair.\n\n > Would it be wrong of me to carry a headscarf and hair pins in my bag incase of anything? I see a lot of the news of hate crimes of people ripping your hijabs off and I’d never want anyone to have to deal with that.\n\nThank you for being understanding, that would not be a problem :)\n\n > Who is allowed to see your hair?\n\nBetween puberty and menopause, only people who the woman cant marry. So father, brothers, sons, uncles as well as husband of course.", "972" ], [ "> By orthodox I meant traditional Sunnis/Salafis\n\nSeveral shia groups are traditional Islam.\n\nSo let's break this up, you think the salaf, and the people for the past centuries, have been practicing Islam wrong?\n\nOr do you think you know better?\n\n > I personally consider myself as a progressive, non traditional Sunni who sometimes reject hadith.\n\n > Sunni\n\n > who sometimes reject hadith\n\nYeaaaah buddy, Islam isnt pick and choose lol.\n\nAnd I still stand by my previous reply, people like you as seen as heretics. And you have no legitimacy. Go follow whatever Islam dlc <PERSON> decided to install today.", "447" ], [ "> God wants us to use our intellect, which unfortunately orthodox Sunnis refuse to use. Orthodox Sunnis follow scholars blindly, which is wrong.\n\nGod sent us the Quran and the <PERSON>. That is what he wants us to follow. You are delusional if you think the vast majority of Muslims throughout history are practicing Islam wrong.\n\n > I'm a Quran centric Sunni..meaning, I accept hadith as long as it makes sense. \n\nAre you stupid? Sunni means following the sunnah. The entire sect is built around the sunnah and hadiths.\n\n > I reject hadith that sound ridiculous \n\nRidiculous based on WHAT? The Quran talks about angels and demons. It talks about a nation trapped behind a wall. To some people that would sound ridiculous. The <PERSON> was sent by God, what he did would of course be not within normal reason, but things that would astound the mind.\n\n > that are insulting to the prophet ( i.e there are hadiths in bukhari that portrays prophet <PERSON> as an womanizer.. astagfirullah.. \n\nWhich hadith?\n\n > The \"scholars\" and the sheep that follow them love these hadith but I reject them...if that makes me a heretic then I'm a proud of it)\n\nNo one with an atom's weight of arrogance will enter heaven, if you think know better than all those scholars, then you have MUCH more than an atom's weight.", "447" ], [ "> Dude I follow Sunnah, \n\nAnd how you know what is and isnt sunnah?\n\n > I do not follow Sunnah that contradicts the Quran. \n\nAnd who decides what does and doesn contradict the Quran? The are hadiths meant to show exceptions or expansion to rules in the Quran\n\n > Please be open minded and do some research on how accurate is bukhari. Orthodox Sunnis believe that bukhari is as pure as the Quran..<PERSON>\n\nNo one thinks that. Around 5% of it isnt strong hadiths, but scholars who make rulings already know that.\n\n > Remember bukhari was written 200 years after the death of the prophet..it is logical that this book will have errors in it. \n\nThat is a stupid comment. It doesnt matter when it was COLLECTED. Not only did it draw upon books that were already written before, people MEMORIZED things as a normal method to transfer information.\n\n > Again, no point in arguing with a close minded person who believes \"scholars\" can never be wrong.. all i can say to you is that do your own research\n\nIf believing 80+% percent of scholars over 14 centuries cant all be wrong makes me close minded, then I will happily wear that badge of honour.", "447" ], [ "> 12:106 And most of them believe not in Allah except while they associate others with Him.\n\nImagine being that much of a heretic to take the Quran out of context to push your agenda and compare Islamic scholars with kafirs.\n\n > Please show me in the Quran where Allah SWT authorizes scholars to collect Sunnah.\n\nThe several verses that talk about the <PERSON> explaining the Quran, and how we should obey him, and how we should do what he says and not do what he bans us from doing.\n\nAlso, the Quran never authorised <PERSON> (or <PERSON>) raa to burn the other ahruf, yet he did.\n\n > 6:114 \\[Say\\], \"Then is it other than Allah I should seek as judge while it is He who has revealed to you the Book \\[i.e., the Quran\\] explained in detail?\" And those to whom We \\[previously\\] gave the Scripture know that it is sent down from your Lord in truth, so never be among the doubters. \n\nAnd how exactly, did Allah explain the Quran? Who, amongst humans, did Allah speak to directly? Hmmmmmmmmmm?\n\n > 77:50 So in which ***hadith*** *after it* (Quran) do they believe?\n\nExcept that hadith in that context means message. The <PERSON> is the last messenger. So whatever he brought (Quran and hadith) is what we need to follow.\n\nWords in different places can mean different things, surprising I know.\n\n > 45:6 These are God's revelations (Quran) that We recite to you with truth, *so* *in which* ***hadith*** *other than God and His revelations* (Quran) do they believe?\n\nExcept that the hadiths are part of what was revealed to the <PERSON>. There are literal hadiths of the <PERSON> transmitting Allah's word to us.\n\n > Go ahead. **Argue with the Quran** while screaming kafirun at *me*. I'll wait.\n\nSay, ˹O Prophet,˺ “Obey Allah and <PERSON>.” If they still turn away, then truly Allah does not like the disbelievers.\n\n3:32\n\nObey Allah and the Messenger, so you may be shown mercy.\n\n3:132\n\nO believers! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. Should you disagree on anything, then refer it to Allah and <PERSON>, if you ˹truly˺ believe in Allah and the Last Day. This is the best and fairest resolution.\n\n4:59\n\nObey Allah and obey the Messenger and beware! But if you turn away, then know that Our Messenger’s duty is only to deliver ˹the message˺ clearly.\n\n5:92\n\nO believers! Obey Allah and His Messenger and do not turn away from him while you hear ˹his call˺.\n\n8:20\n\nObey Allah and <PERSON> and do not dispute with one another, or you would be discouraged and weakened. Persevere! Surely Allah is with those who persevere.\n\n8:46\n\nO believers! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger, and do not let your deeds be in vain.\n\n47:33\n\n<PERSON> (May Allah be pleased with him) reported:\nOne day, Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) delivered a very effective speech, as a result, eyes shed tears and hearts became softened. A man said: \"O Prophet of Allah! It sounds as if this is a farewell speech, so advise us.\" He (ﷺ) said, \"I admonish you to fear Allah, and to listen and obey even if a black slave has been appointed as your leader. For whoever among you lives after me will see much discord. So hold fast to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs who will come after me. Adhere to them and hold fast to them. Beware of Bid'ah (in religion) because every Bid'ah is a misguidance.\"\n\nReference\t : <PERSON> 702\n\nI am going to leave it at this. If you still dont think we need the hadiths, there is no point in discussing further.", "447" ], [ "Except that he didnt say that \"marry your daughters to me otherwise you wont be saved\". He asked for her hand in marriage, and her father, who saw him like his brother, agreed to the proposal. That daughter, <PERSON>, was ALREADY engaged so she was going to get married either way but the father saw this as a better proposal from a better person.\n\nHe also didnt ask all people to marry their daughters to him, what you are doing right now is called a strawman and it is a logical fallacies.", "83" ], [ "> i dont know how wearing the hijab \"wrong\" is comparable to \n\nThey are both sins. End of discussion. Both people are in the wrong. A Muslim woman should not be affected by a hijab law enforcement because she is supposed to wear it regardless of whether she is in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, UK, or US.\n\n > looking at her in the first place \n\nIf it is his job to police public decency, he is obliged to look\n\n > judging her attire in public\n\nIt is his job\n\n > as a stranger telling a women not related to his life how to dress.\n\nRepeating, it is his job to stop sin and encourage good deeds. Same as a cop can arrest a public nudist in cities where that is banned.\n\n > idk how much moral emphasis islam places on a headcovering to out balance public shaming and breach of privacy. \n\nThere is no privacy in public. Anything you do within the public sphere is subject to rules and regulations. Headscarfs are a religious obligation.\n\n > I personally think there is just culturally and politically always an urge in humans to control how women present them selves\n\nMen and women have decency laws, men have lower ones (for obvious reasons), but I assure you that if some man was walking around in a speedo, he would be chastised and punished as well.\n\n > dress modestly becomes a tug of war about mens attention \n\nMen are visual, so in any sphere were men and women interact, women need to adhere to modesty laws. Men and women should also try their best to avert their gaze.\n\n > / parts of the head you can / cant show / make up / eye shadow / color of the scarf / length of the scarf / embroidered scarf vs shiny scarf, I've heard arguments about this the whole 10 yards in islamic cultural events... its weird\n\nIt is pretty clear really. Minimum is to cover all body except face or hands. Some schools of thought say you need to cover those as well, but you can follow either (depending on where you live as well). Covering also means nothing that shows the shape of your body nor transparent. Any makeup put for the sake of adornment (like lipstick) is banned in front of un related men.", "972" ], [ "> aking of your hijab is a sin? I dont see how that is a morally sound stance. unless you have a source that explicitly states that the act of taking off a hijab (or wearing it incorrectly) is a sin.\n\nThe hijab (full body covering) is obligatory in front of unrelated men. That is a very well known fundamental Islamic ruling that has been known for over 14 centuries.\n\n > Do you think the almighty has some autobot algorithm set up that just goes \n\nThe Almighty knows everything that is happening or that will happen.\n\n > or do you think our lives and decisions are given contextual interpretation. \n\nWhat textual interpretation does that woman have for sinning and being indecent?\n\n > My mother was asked to stop wailing when my father passed away... .because there where men in the room and they were not to hear her voice.... \n\nWailing is a sin. It is also why women are banned from going to cemeteries as they might cause a scene.\n\n > strange rules we construct and police one another for.\n\nNarrated <PERSON>, <PERSON>\n\n<PERSON>, daughter of <PERSON>, entered upon the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) wearing thin clothes. The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) turned his attention from her. He said: O <PERSON>', when a woman reaches the age of menstruation, it does not suit her that she displays her parts of body except this and this, and he pointed to his face and hands.\n\nReference: <PERSON> 4104\n\nGot any issues with what the Prophet PBUH said?", "972" ], [ "In general, the main things that are unIslamic and need to change in extremely conservative Islamic countries are:\n\n1) Removal of any restrictions for women to get education. Even if they have to build gender segregated colleges or introduce online lecture system.\n\n2) Forced marriages\n\n3) Honor killings\n\nIf you are a Muslim, rules related to headscarf should not bother you, as you should wear it either way. We look at the west and we see what has liberalism done to public decency. We would be fools to repeat their mistakes.\n\nAlso, please do mention what you disagree about.", "972" ], [ "> Yes I do have issues with the suppression of grief and not allowing a widow to visit her husbands grave or wailing since these have no inherent moral value and one can argue that the social and psychological suppression of such emotions if not healthy. \n\nIncorrect. Islam is against public wailing and such acts as they are seen as acts of the people of ignorance. We, as Muslims, must not object to the decree of Allah. We should instead say \"we belong to Allah and to him we will return\". By accepting that death is part of our fate, and that Allah wills ways who he wants, we need to move forward. We might miss them, but not do undignified acts likes wailing and hitting our cheeks.\n\n > not allowing a widow to visit her husbands grave\n\nShe is only banned if she will wail and do such acts. If she will only visit, then it is allowed.\n\n > Yes, I know that's what is says in the scripture, I choose to disagree and I guess that is a sin too, I'll take it up with him personally when my time comes.\n\nNope. It isnt just a sin. It literally means you are not a Muslim.\n \n > idk why you make moral stance sound like a threat like \"got any issues\" lol, my issues mean nothing, are we really in discussion of exploring morality or are you just scolding me for questioning scripture?\n\nI am confused, are you a non Muslim? In that case, the laws of Islam are those that stem from the Quran and hadiths. Islam means submission to Allah, we dont argue. As for morality, well, the hair is a part of the woman that has been used throughout history for attraction and adornment. Whether it is growing it, styling it, colouring it, etc, it isnt just a simple thing. Thus it does make sense why a religious modest attire would include covering the hair.", "972" ], [ "> My disagreements are abstracts and have to do with not seeing moral relevance in things like head coverings. \n\nBecause you base your moral compass on your own understanding. As Muslims we base it on the rules from God, so obviously some things we wont understand since some laws might have future implications or are related to some hidden social factor we arent aware of.\n\n > decency is completely subjective \n\nDecency is only subjective if we use humans to define it :) Islam has well defined laws because the reference for morality is God. So decency in Islam means what Allah has deemed decent. You might not know, but back in the day Muslims were seen as indecent by the west, now it is the opposite, see how humans change?\n\n > liberalism thing is too blanket of a statement, \n\nLiberalism is basically deciding what is moral immoral based on \"be free to to do whatever you want as long as you dont harm anyone\".\n\n > and their arguments have evidence because alot of people come here as refugees and runaways from conservative states to escape abuse or capital punishment.\n\nOur countries are run by dictators funded by the west. Most of african countries had their riches plundered by france and britain. Other middle eastern countries were basically collapsed by American military or sanctions.", "230" ], [ "> Teaching your daughter is a false equivalent to bullying, infantilising and abusing your wife\n\nA man is responsible for both his wife and children. Which is why he can physically chastise his wife if she has very ill conduct.\n\n > Also forcing your daughter to pray would make her hate religion too. You severely, severely underestimate how kids/teenagers work\n\nNope, parents force their kids to go to school, drink milk, and eat their vegetables.\n\nAlso:\n\nNarrated <PERSON>\n\nThe Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: Command your children to pray when they become seven years old, and beat them for it (prayer) when they become ten years old; and arrange their beds (to sleep) separately.\n\nReference\t : Sunan Abi Dawud 495", "335" ], [ "I used to be a nationalist. It is drilled in my brain by media and family how my country is the best, how my people are the best, how I should fight and protect my country and be loyal to it. But then I read history, I got closer to God, I saw how politicians control the uneducated masses, and woke up. \n\nNow, my loyality is only to Allah. My nationality is nothing but paperwork that lets me travel and work. My blood only connects me to my family, not my country. The country of my parents is no different to the country I grew up in and no different to any other country.", "227" ], [ "They arent sects. They are schools of thought. Basically they have different methods of making rulings which result in different rulings about secondary issues. For example, the niqab is obligatory in some schools and optional in others. Hanafis dont consider lobsters as fish therefore they dont allow people to eat it.\n\nUsually you woud just follow your parents' madhab (school)", "165" ], [ "> I didn't lol, you're changing your narrative all of a sudden which makes no sense. \n\nI didnt change my narrative. I was talking about a specific issue then you generalized it as the ONLY thing that matters (it is crucial, but things like religion and personality are important as well)\n\n > You literally said above that you may as well stay single if someone won't cook for you.\n\nI did say that it isnt logical to marry if your lifestyle wont get any easier (still have to cook for yourself for men or work full time for women).\n\n > You literally equated the status of a woman as someone to cook and clean for you, \n\nYou did that by twisting my words since the conversation was specifically about cooking and chores.\n\n > and if a woman will not cook and clean for you, you should not marry her because there's nothing else going for her. \n\nAnd you talked about love, plenty of people in love get divorced because, guess what, long term relationships dont run on love but responsibility, commitment, and empathy.\n\n > You, not me. Don't twist this around because you realized how stupid you sounded, ffs. \n\nIf you are going to twist my words, take them out of context, and strawman then yeah anything would sound stupid.\n\n > How are you still not banned from this subreddit?\n\nSame reason someone like you isnt banned.", "164" ] ]
494
[ 4299, 5475, 12317, 11159, 20354, 15127, 14038, 9253, 3450, 20365, 19988, 1113, 10828, 10144, 1370, 17179, 7157, 2027, 6049, 182, 11246, 5070, 10351, 1401, 10689, 3865, 5112, 6276, 21128, 3983, 8601, 2216, 14239, 13790, 18366, 1301, 1905, 6343, 8171, 7617, 10263, 22893, 1126, 13126, 1314, 4442, 12143, 21992, 24882, 2790, 751, 13996, 10020, 10659, 17373, 6228, 5425, 10172, 7488, 9558, 22243, 2191, 22041, 19492, 3042, 23180, 9602, 941, 4051, 6633, 24202, 23474, 9237, 9151, 1222, 1130, 24641, 13387, 19332, 12246, 4814, 14282, 22916, 21417, 9263, 10484, 14000, 14494, 20191, 9308, 23490, 8216, 5165, 23115, 21312, 15756, 25471, 2200, 16067, 22389, 13099, 7155, 8685, 2277, 20707, 25359, 10746, 2048, 11884, 23261, 16777, 6644, 24446, 21649, 4108, 9009, 656, 21579, 7453, 7985, 4168, 2475, 5958, 4273, 342, 13323, 21220, 16208, 21592, 10252, 24736, 10481, 10476, 14955, 10890, 14636, 6060, 20553, 7824, 16812, 7609, 526, 6351, 9880, 6996, 15136, 16259, 14805, 24185, 16781, 5961, 6004, 7855, 7734, 7826, 9240, 5697, 11808, 20106, 19452, 15453, 333, 3390, 8205, 834, 796, 6704, 12527, 19760, 22373, 21462, 3324, 2880, 13256, 11619, 13792, 3831, 20382, 3177, 1937, 20471, 1055, 9745, 15215, 5151, 4270, 8977, 14156, 20363, 9285, 8591, 10007, 23154, 147, 12669, 8253, 11399, 25164, 7492, 11758, 5947, 978, 17755, 20187, 24319, 19833, 12657, 6792, 10751, 17172, 7925, 7356, 14496, 5449, 10304, 10790, 4303, 11403, 394, 20592, 23530, 13365, 2689, 1904, 9809, 1941, 112, 4897, 714, 19359, 24928, 12243, 11325, 12033, 16142, 16893, 5835, 12847, 10258, 18981, 10079, 10738, 4686, 5622, 10759, 24933, 23955, 23836, 23928, 14131, 16605, 16392, 14648, 11431, 10236, 13834, 18012, 412, 5913, 5523, 9862, 630, 13000, 7964, 20303, 3909, 20549, 12834, 2783, 19180, 7261, 21283, 10593, 5190, 6077, 13043, 10148, 15774, 15085, 704, 8863, 4254, 15386, 22653, 14720, 18436, 7764, 1112, 16428, 5473, 19116, 10298, 25195, 22330, 25182, 1044, 3240, 8037, 3146, 666, 9694, 11137, 1883, 20435, 4735, 2708, 6826, 6635, 1164, 5040, 1650, 18505, 24807, 926, 4099, 14339, 876, 17352, 6662, 17656, 1365, 20443, 23388, 23813, 24184, 8130, 9780, 3131, 9323, 10513, 11956, 9755, 1017, 11641, 11276, 1207, 18320, 25464, 1519, 21105, 11584, 7699, 5510, 17315, 5230, 9548, 9653, 8328, 11712, 17906, 18172, 13749, 23462, 4637, 25088, 23715, 15188, 18780, 23840, 18349, 15988, 14944, 1214, 17189, 9693, 23578, 23233, 23045, 1583, 19911, 5218, 7884, 17404, 457, 8585, 25294, 5948, 2275, 508, 24143, 14616, 1198, 13509, 10768, 492, 4552, 10718, 4489, 8800, 10537, 21941, 15211, 2206, 13408, 19814, 18732, 4142, 23236, 21263, 9119, 7280, 6697, 8695, 19125, 13291, 2828, 15694, 18455, 5818, 4768, 8919, 13400, 8758, 16497, 16277, 1637, 84, 5392, 13761, 14896, 12692, 18686, 7994, 11574, 11821, 14508, 22948, 9861, 6116, 14649, 10, 6328, 5280, 3813, 9103, 19410, 22147, 14763, 13042, 15999, 11521, 12670, 21811, 16913, 10333, 15922, 7057, 9915, 6438, 15356, 18114, 21873, 9520, 10843, 14660, 10867, 8017, 13631, 20507, 20514, 19917, 5941, 8687, 10462, 5825, 6569, 14436, 4730, 21741, 6670, 1458, 4872, 24474, 9041, 18263, 7778, 2557, 3438, 797, 15113, 11565, 22254, 15034, 23833, 17265, 14446, 6023, 8045, 7127, 3172, 15477, 16727, 12500, 7292, 8922, 24412, 9682, 10614, 868 ]
reddit_dump_0_-
[ [ "It doesn't even look like Battlefield. It looks like PUBG put out a new snow level. The Asian with the sniper rifle is their staple look. The Stg 44 is the only thing that seems to have anything to do with WW2 in that photo, and its no surprise that its prominently displaced. However it doesn't necessarily help the marketing, because now you have to ask \"is this a German?\".\n\nReminds me of this scene _URL_0_", "892" ], [ "I'm not sure of what the phenomenon is, but I'm sure someone has a name to put to it, where there are successive \"dynasties\" of programmers and managers on a project over the years, and they begin working with the game as it is and with the population it has, rather than attempting to fulfill the vision of the original designers.\n\nBy adding luminance and increasing the grind further, they truly made the game impossible to get into. I put way too many hours into the game, I macro'd, I had a good guild that had luminance macroing spots and quested constantly for luminance, and I only had gotten halfway leveled up with my luminance.\n\nThen they had these olthoi as some emergency way to cope with the low populations. It wasn't even the worse idea in the world, but it was a bandaid solution and a refusal to face reality.\n\nAt the end of the day, maybe there was just no one around that truly cared or was able to work on it to the extent it needed to be worked on.\n\nRealistically, the game needed to be reset. Every single item in the game needed to be made decorative and useless.\n\nThe technology needed to save Asheron's Call might not have even existed in a feasible form. Asheron's Call needed DAG technology (Directed Acyclic Graph) which is basically like a \"horizontally scalable bitcoin\", a very fast bitcoin in other words, of premade coins.\n\nIn order to generate an item, the items GUID should need to be associated with a \"coin\", this way it cannot be duped, because computers hashed away to prove the authenticity of the item that is being generated, and there will be no way to duplicate it.\n\nBy the same measure, eventually all the items in the world should be dispensed, and the only way to get new items is by destroying old ones. You do this by not having muling, you just have your item slots and inventory. You'd still drop mana stones and robes etc to protect your armor.\n\nAC went far too item centric and it didn't have the technology to support the items to make sure they were authentic. You can't have an item centric economy when the technology is not there to support it. \n\nThey should have reset XP too, and increased the grind by a factor of 500 or something, so that most people would never ever get out of the low to mid levels. You might see a monarch get to that level max level and max luminance in 2030.\n\nLastly, these \"coins\" associated with GUIDs would be bought as part as the monthly subscription. \n\nMight sound like I am ranting here, but this is how you're gonna see the second golden era of MMORPGs, once we start seeing hardcore MMORPG's using crypto currency as their in game currency. And once the technology is protecting the items, and the grind increased to such an extent that you absolutely have to be part of a huge monarchy, so that you may be powerful only in the sum of all the small parts.", "656" ], [ "Whatever the case, it's clear that the modern day programmers have to rebuild the item engine from scratch. So perhaps they should figure out what you are talking about and integrate the atomic commit. I think AC could succeed again if it was shown to have a stellar record of integrity, along with scarcity. \n\nWhat I am talking about could only be done in a new MMORPG where the developer has all the rights. It will be the second golden era of MMORPGs though. The reason you would want the tech I am talking about is for the coins, as the transactions only take like 2 seconds. See the nano cryptocurrency on Youtube to see why it would make sense to replace pyreals, hypothetically. You can send like 0.00000005 of a whole coin. Plus a unique identifier is connected to each transaction.", "831" ], [ "Just buy a nice house for around 250 thousand dollars, use 50K to get you through university (no more, ideally only 20k), and use the rest to help you with the maintenance costs of the house until you can get on your own two feet in your career. Maintenance costs being like, a new roof, siding needs replacing because of a hurricane etc. Nothing else. Earn your own money to buy a fridge, couch, etc. You got all the time in the world.\n\nThis is the investment that would have trouble failing. You'd just have to be careful not to buy a property in a city, but snipe a nice house just outside of the city lines in a township that is known to have low taxes and low services, and isn't giving in to developers. Then your taxes will be low, you'd want to have a septic field etc ideally.\n\nYour costs would be so low at this point, you'd have an education that would at least make sure that you're employed, even if you're making minimum wage your job would be tolerable that you'd at least be able to keep a job. You'd have no rent, so plenty of money to save. If you saved half your money from your minimum wage job, you'd easily retire. The other half for food, stuff for your house, etc.\n\nInvesting in a stock is not going to literally be putting a roof over your head. Your house may appreciate in value. Either way if you are set up so that you could earn minimum wage, retire and live a respectable retired life in that house, which would be well maintained throughout your life, you are pretty well situation not to fail, materially speaking.\n\nThis plan just makes sure you cannot go wrong. You an only do better, if you get a job that pays double what minimum wage pays, all the better. You should not expect that, though. You are planning for the worse here. If things go well, you may have a lot more money in the future and could roughly sell the property for what you bought it for, and by then you'll have a lot more experience.\n\nLastly, our economy will probably crash by the time you get access to the money, so you could buy properties for far less than you can now, which makes this idea even better in the future than it is now.", "488" ], [ "You could try and dump it all into a retirement plan, not sure if there are limits on what you can put in. But I think that's gonna put you at a huge disadvantage, imaginably you will have to pay rent, and who knows what sort of financial crisises will occur in the world by the time you are 40. You need money for food, clothing and shelter. Clothing is very cheap these days. Food will be your main expense if you own a house. The rest of the money, well half of it can go to retirement (if you are making minimum wage), that is the rest of the money left over after you pay for food where you can do whatever you want, you can buy computers, you can buy investments, whatever. The stock market seems set up for a crash, look at the history of the s and p 500.\n\nGo to google and type in history of s and p 500 and set it to max. We seem due for a large crash. I am not sure if there is any magic with a figure like 350k honestly, you will need a house at some point, you don't want to be paying rent at age 65 if you screw up and the economy goes to hell.", "258" ], [ "If you are in the Philippines a wall with razor wire on the top should suffice, a couple of barking dogs doesn't hurt either. Well to do people live in suburbs with a fence around it and guard at the gate, the wealthier ones have their own private police. Ive never had any problems going out into the countryside, in the markets etc. I don't mess with Africa, you'd have to be an idiotic dickhead to go there for any other reason than mining gems or something, even then you'd want a white security detail.", "765" ], [ "how about the philippines. you guys are asses. they speak English and they call their parties \"discos\" because the last influence the US had on them was in the 70s and 80s. You literally nuked Japan. They burned your soldiers alive. They dont like you and they think they are superior, even now. The philippines GDP is also gonna be next to Chinas for the next 40 years. By no metric does your opinion make any sense. Japan was the boomers thing, its as big as its gonna get.", "655" ], [ "even if you get your all white little gang situated, you're all still very awful sinners. there is no golden age on the horizon. this is not to be black pilled, its just that we rely on all these people in society who are retarded. if they have failed us then our days are numbered. you cant just purge everyone and start fresh, especially in a world with nuclear weapons.", "725" ], [ "Yes sir, he is trying to do what Singapore did on a broader scale. Singapore is a city state so its a little more manageable. Obviously you're never gonna completely get the Philippines drug free when they can grow copious amounts of dope in the jungles. The meth in particular is not ideal. And he is doing much more for the Philippines than the politicians are doing in North America. Actually we're going backwards, we're legalizing weed, which has been shown to cause poorer economic outcomes, health outcomes in young adults.", "382" ], [ "The war stuff is a moot point, not sure why you even brought it up, just to introduce enough irrelevant points to distract your idiotic audience.\n\nYeah, it has a low GDP, that means much more room to grow. Learn the basics of economics. Japan has an aging population, which means a big social security net that will cost a lot to maintain. Their costs are way higher than both the Philippines and China. They lose big contracts all the time to China.\n\nIs Japan a safer investment? Sure. So that's the one point you get. Congratulations.", "655" ], [ "I'm not gonna continue retyping out the same thing over and over again, read what I've read. They are getting old, they have no kids, their costs are high, etc. They will likely drop in the rankings over the next few years. Am I saying the Philippines is doing better now, or did I say it will have the highest GDP next to China for the next 40 years?\n\nSo check back in 40 years faggot, please read correctly the first time.", "79" ], [ "Plenty of money are gonna start making money this way, that is the pattern. The idea is that money would be flowing into bitcoin the closer you get to Christmas after June, whereas money would be flowing out of the market as you go from Christmas to June. So this is the one final near death experience before the markets start showing a little more strength. People will realize this pattern and it might even have a quadripple bottom, but people realizing this pattern is gonna make the bottom even more solid, because there is profit in it. The cowardice is the money maker here.", "1008" ], [ "Complete waste of resources if nukes actually exist. China is not having this big buildup lol, they have one shitty aircraft carrier, maybe 2 max. If anything they are letting us just waste our money on nothing while they actually build high speed transit between their cities and other expenditures that actually make sense. Japan can go waste its money now too and sink its economy.", "753" ], [ "They dump a load of concrete in the sea that is right next to their country to protect it. Do you know how stupid you sound right now. Pretend America was dumping sand and concrete to make an island right outside of New York City. Its the same thing. They are pretty much on the defensive, let them have their little island. \n\nYes you are wasting a ton of money to maintain a huge military that will never really be used other than to fight for Israel. If you fight Russia it will be nukes. China would use nukes. They don't have a big enough military to handle you without using nukes. Nukes would be used to reduce the size of the army, then they would try to take you on head to head. They wouldn't use them against cities right away.", "124" ], [ "You need to get out more. Some of the Hapa dudes I have met have been incredibly smart, good with money, better than me at all the games I play with them. Being friends with a Hapa dude partially convinced me to go over there originally, also all the Filipino workers they were bringing over kind of gave me a crush on them. If I find out someone is a hapa, I open my ears because its learning time.", "33" ], [ "Everyone bitches and complains constantly these days, about themselves or others. Whites constantly complain about the Jews for example. Or they blame me for diluting the white race. Few work with what they have, or are grateful. While there are certain real problems in the world, there are more often than not imaginary ones in America. That is part of why I had trouble dealing with white women, I am very straightforward and say exactly what is on my mind, and most of the problems here are not real, and I would call it for what it is, which does not make me a popular guy. So its better to go to where the problems are real. Then I have a real reason to be stressed, and that I can deal with. Fake ass problems, no I don't have time for it. No problems are being solved here, we are not untangling the deep state here. Actually we're being set backwards here which is probably why they let us set up shop, people go no where in their career and learn no skills but they feel productive here at MDE. It's not a good thing.", "941" ], [ "You're on to it. Basically there are like \"two levels\" of microbes to process the inulin for example. First is the bifido which are the good ones, and the inulin offers them a competitive advantage in the zero sum game which is the battle over food in the gut. I mean the bacteria only have the food you put into the gut to eat, or I mean if you aren't eating well, they can eat the mucus lining of the gut, but there is nothing else to eat there so its a zero sum game.\n\nAnd once all the bifido bacteria are saturated and have eaten all the inulin they can eat, well plenty of bad bacteria simply cannot eat inulin, ever, which gives the bifido etc a competitive advantage, but here's the kicker, some so-so bacteria can, so you start seeing a bacterial explosion of these less than ideal bacteria which can process the inulin but generate a lot of gas byproducts and generally create a state of dysbiosis.\n\nThe bacteria may get better at eating inulin through epigenetic improvements in the guts (I speculate), but the real phenomenon is that there numbers improve due to this competitive advantage in a zero sum game. Then there are more around to eat the inulin. But if you eat too much inulin, you won't be doing yourself any favors.\n\nGOS generally helps avoid this dysbiosis problem. But I like all different kinds of prebiotics and I had FOS (Inulin) today.\n\nJust wanted to add that little bit there, not the most articulate explanation but hopefully it imparts the general notion. \n\nEdit: disclaimer, I was pretty tired when I typed this out and had no sleep the night before.", "833" ], [ "Yeah the funny thing is, that yeah I am sure you are worried about my Filipino wife because you are cucking in fear about the Chinese here, when all they are doing is basically stealing the sea from the Philippines. So Filipina wife indeed why do you care so much about the Flips losing their ocean? \n\nAnd do you have any idea of the size of the area you are talking about? They don't need a man made island in the middle of it. That would cut the flight time of an A320 from an hour and 50 minutes to maybe an hour, from that man made island to the Philippines. So a jet fighter is going even faster, why would it need to respond so quickly to something that it somehow merits billions of dollars investment in an airbase?\n\nIt's largely a cock measuring contest and a pristine waste of good money, like all war and military investments have been. Burning the taxpayer dollars on the fireplace. Look at (((who))) owns these companies. It's pissing away the future basically. \n\nSomehow you will justify this. That's what smart people do, they make man made islands. No its what corrupt people do, and they convince you that its a good idea, and you eat it up, because thats what dumb people do.\n\nLastly, at least these corrupt fageets who sell all the airports body scanners, at least that somewhat makes sense. Safe air travel in a 777 seems like a marvel of humanity, flying over the North pole, watching movies, yeah it seems like that is worth trying to protect. \n\nThat is way different than just bombing the children of goatherders Which is all those aircraft carriers have ever done in their lifespans. They break a bottle of wine on the bow of the carrier, it goes through its entire lifespan and then is retired, and all its done is bomb the children of goatherders. We never actually go to war with China or Russia you putz, unless you want to go back to the Korean war as some sort of justification for aircraft carriers, like a dumbie would.", "775" ], [ "Never masturbate. Your body doesn't need you to do it, it can process it by itself. No one asked you to do that, you are like a dude that goes into the forest and stomps on pretty flowers for the fun of it, get a life. There are microscopic brain cells in semen. Think about it. Your brain is connected to your spine. Your brain is your spine. Your spine is your brain. Your dick is connected to your spine. If you have a sexual thought and you get an erection, your entire body immediately tenses up. It's all connected. You all subscribe to \"absurd norms\", if you are truly sane, then you will seem insane to society, and all of society will seem insane to you. But people who jack off will turn into what I call \"jack off idiots\", they will have killed off so much of their brain from jacking off that their idiocy will be super evident when they are 50, and probably pretty evident through their 30s and 40s, especially when paired with drinking. They will be complete idiots in their 20s if they jack off, smoke weed and drink. Which is what the government wants you to do by the way. This is a public service message.", "524" ], [ "That's what <PERSON> thought. It would not be ideal to be stuck in a basement with him. You certainly would not want to say anything to upset him and possibly make your fate worse. However that is just a sick mind that is trying to find meaning in life through extreme deviance, he is trying to move the needle with his internal police man of his conscience, to try to get something to register. At the end of the day, he was just a lost child, very far from God both inside of himself and in the outside world. At the end of the day, such people would not put down their gun or weapon and fight like a man, they are the ones who are afraid of who they point their weapons at.", "942" ], [ "It looks good man, I have to say the only way the screen and raspberry pi etc makes sense is if its incorporated into a unit like that. Its a nice screen. I tried to avoid going the gaming route with a raspberry pi because I play too many games already. But this is one project that I could get into. I already have a blackberry with physical keyboard so thats somewhat close to this as far as gaming goes. But this would definitely be a better experience by a long shot. It looks like maybe this is the first time this has been done? Good work overall.", "659" ], [ "Yeah smoking weed is so bad ass now that many governments have legalized it. It's about as cool now as smoking, so hopefully we can stop trying to make it seem edgy (it isn't), and focus purely on the negative health aspects (for one, how about youth are expected to have poorer health and economic outcomes if they smoke weed). Yeah if you are into raspberry pi and you're young, you might have a bright future. What a waste if you used it on projects like he is suggesting. Don't smoke dope.", "382" ], [ "I've not been to Mexico but I would be more afraid of getting my head cut off in Mexico by some crazy drug gang. In the Philippines I would be more afraid of the police, but I think they would rip me off for like 1000 CAD and let me go. They wouldn't want it to be turning into some big news story. I wouldn't insult some drunk Filipinos that want me to buy them beer, either. Maybe I would buy it and leave quickly.", "356" ], [ "I've been there and stayed here many time my friend, both in Manila and the Visayas, and I will be back there again hopefully within the next 10 months. Not all Filipinos are good people, there are a lot of alcoholic scumbags and meth heads, but yeah the president is actually doing something about the meth which is what scared the shit out of me in 2014. I was in a taxi cab with a guy that looked like he was on meth, he was laughing at me as I got out of his cab after he cleared scammed me. They ended up charging me not much more than it would have costed to get a taxi in any other country but the dude was clearly high on drugs.\n\nThat is gonna be a ticket to a very high GDP for your country, they are making the right moves and I can rant and rave all days about all the improvements I've seen in your country just in the last 4 years. Manila airport is WAY better and thats a huge development. It was terrible back in 2014. I don't even mind it now vs never wanting to ever go back there again, so they did a good job.", "1004" ], [ "Yeah I hope they don't start going nuts one day or something, but they seemed to have been tame in comparison, at the end of the day they are still Filipino and not crackpot Indonesians. They seem loyal to the country despite being Muslim. They want to get ahead too and they see that the wealth is in the north with people who know English, etc, they know whitey don't go down there for a reason. I'll never go down there, I spend big bucks in the Philippines and I tip real good and help people out where I can.", "79" ], [ "well the thing is that 4K provides more pixels to work with and when you narrow the fov, well you just get more pixels of what is in front of you, which is generally a low pixel count bitmap texture. so by squeezing as much as visually possible into the image you get the max amount of unique pixels possible, the most amount of good looking information possible. \n\nits also not uncommon to play like this all the time on darktide, i always did, because someone can sneak up behind you and shoot you in the back with specialized sneak attack and war magic.", "659" ], [ "I am not out of my mind, you are gaslit to hell. You have to be out of your gourd to somehow legitimize spending trillions of dollars fighting over a worthless piece of desert. If it is worth so much then why aren't we developing all the vacant desert in Arizona? If we spent a trillion dollars over in Arizona we could have an entire new economic zone in the United States.\n\nHonestly I don't have to argue beyond this point, you will continue to validate spending trillions on Zionist cabal wars because they got you early when you were in school. Just because Britain etc fought over the Middle East doesn't really mean it's legitimate. It stopped being legitimate after the silk road and then became about religious fanaticism. It's not about oil anymore because America is now an exporter of oil.", "677" ], [ "OK, I know you want to just hate on <PERSON> supporters, but please understand that people like you are the problem. People who cannot think in shades of gray and have to make this blue vs red, when <PERSON> is violating his promise not to invade Syria.\n\nThat was the only way this could have worked because <PERSON> was the pro-Syrian war candidate. \n\nDo you not understand this simple point?", "249" ], [ "Well again that is the point, I was making fun of <PERSON> supports *after* <PERSON> has gotten into this Syria racket. Before that, he was doing better than the establishment government historically has done over the last 25 years or so. That's all out the window now though. \n\nIt's post irony as a form of humor, people in this sub must not be advanced enough in terms of brain size/humor to appreciate the fine hues and shades of gray contained within such humor.", "339" ], [ "Let me get this straight, <PERSON> gives like 40 billion to Israel at the end of his term, and we can't find 40 billion to build a border wall, and somehow they are the puppet state. Their borders are very secure and they want to send 40,000 African refugees back to Africa, not only is that not questioned at all by the west, but they decide they want to send those African refugees to western countries (they want to dump what they consider to be \"trash\" in our back yard), and again we have no problem with that. Are these people going to come and be doctors and lawyers etc? No. The taxpayer and citizen doesn't want it, but since they decided it, it's happening. It's like that with all of their decisions btw. They decide it, good as done. End of story. \n\nCan you explain what sort of logic you are following here to get it all so backwards? I can be convinced if you can lay out a rational argument.", "677" ], [ "Well if we load up on 3.50 nano and it goes up to 35 dollars, which it almost did before, then that's a 10x profit and a chance that it could happen this year. Even if it took 10 years, then that would be around the same amount of profit as the stock market.\n\nI mean if bitcoin can go to 20k, it seems like it would make more sense to bring it up to 20k and let it drop again, rather than shorting out 6.5k, so it seems to make more sense that a bull run would occur rather that bitcoin dropping to 1K, if whales do really have complete control over the market. It seems like if you dumped all your nano at whatever price it was at when bitcoin starts to climb above 20K, you'd make it out with a nice profit. \n\nSo overall, it seems like a bitcoin bullrun would occur soon, rich people don't want to see their money doing nothing for way too long, and if they can make it rise to 20k with little risk, it would be much more profitable than making it drop. Maybe whales are accumulating right now as well, like I don't see where they would be able to find all sorts of 1K bitcoin when the price is 6.5K on the open market, so where would they be getting this special opportunity to crash the market for a huge profit unless they are buying in now for around this price, then crashing it after it goes above 20K?", "1008" ], [ "imagine buying weed off someone in real life with 21 bitcoin. the dealer is just like. i dont know what to do with this man. ill just put it where i know i wont lose it (behind a picture frame or in a bible), then he comes back years later and sees you on the street corner. he is in his lambo. he asks you how that eighth was, and spins his tires until they are burning rubber and he peels off into the sunset", "71" ], [ "Just goes to show how smart they are. All that money goes right to their heads. They think that just because they can afford some huge wardrobe that all us common Joes are wasting all this time on our appearances. Meanwhile it takes <PERSON> about 20 seconds to put his clothes in the washer, another 10 seconds an hour later to put it in the dryer, a few minutes hanging up clothes, once a week, he just puts on whatever is clean and goes to work. A couple of minutes per week not to look like a psycho, and a billionaire cannot figure that out. <PERSON> was nuts like that too. Bug men think that these \"life pro tips\" are genius and key to the mindset of a millionaire. You can't make it up folks.", "747" ], [ "Do you know a book that basically says what you said here:\n\n > Gnostics believe that this reality was an accident. It was created by an imperfect and arrogant entity known as <PERSON> (the God from the old testament), and his archons (angels). This physical reality is just a copy of the real divine realms where this imperfect entity was born. The planet Earth is a living organism known as Gaia-Sophia. She's <PERSON> mother, and she is also our mother. <PERSON> and his archons created our bodies but they did not gave us our divinity.\n\nBut it also has lots of quotes to old Gnostic scriptures etc?", "487" ], [ "You can use your credit card to buy dope illegally, you can use it at the liquor store, you can do any number of stupid things with your credit card. The litecoin I bought for 100 dollars just as the bullrun was taking off was not super risky and I ended up nearly tripling my money on it. It can go well, unlike every time people buy muh weedz or booze on their CC. If the bank is going to start policing and micromanaging lives, they should start there. The problem is that it would make the credit card useless. See crypto is their kryptonite, its immutable and people will be able to buy whatever they want with it. Not even being able to use your debit card to buy crypto shows how mutable your fiat is. You literally have to put your money in an envelop and mail it if you are BMO customer, thats the freedom you have.", "537" ], [ "Of course they did. This whole proceeding was a big joke. He was never once worried about any sort of issue, the demise of Facebook is probably planned as well. They will come out with some new service that is even more intrusive, some how they will manage to film people crapping on their toilets. They will call it crapbook. It is very valueble to squash a rebelliion when you have pictures of people on the crapper", "611" ], [ "it depends. you have guys pissing their beds at age 16. you have abusive mothers that lead to men killing women prostitutes. the homosexual nuts were often sexually abused as kids or got erections from spankings, they might be sexually incapable of getting sexual pleasure unless violence is involved. <PERSON> had a normal childhood but had a taste for violent porn and alcohol. honestly a lot of good men could turn bad like <PERSON> if they fell into vices that are truly beneathe them. <PERSON> was a lawyer student", "292" ], [ "That seems extremely silly to me. The developer of nano has said repeatedly that it was designed to fit within a single UDP internet traffic packet. It is very easy to just say \"oh well nano is so simple, we can just get another crypto to do the same thing\". \n\nSure it may be very fast. Nano might be 2 seconds and EOS might be 6 seconds. Or hell maybe eos is even 3 seconds, lets give complete benefit of the doubt. So there is no difference when you are standing in line at the supermarket.\n\nBut big companies put entire fiberoptic cable lines across the ocean just so they have a couple extra milliseconds of latency to execute ultra fast automatic trades. \n\nOver time that little bit of difference, because it will not fit into a UDP packet, would cause EOS not to be competitive in the financial markets. Nano would gain enormous amounts of volume if it was being utilized as a major currency on exchanges because it would be faster.\n\nI mean it doesn't seem like its important but you are not this huge financial company and running automated trading. As far as I'm concerned it is uneducated FUD. Not that it won't have an effect on the current price, but in terms of actual value and merit based very long term value, I would like to see the actual technical evidence that it is competitive in high speed trading, which is where nano would dominate as a bitcoin replacement.", "831" ], [ "We can continue to get dumber, let's break this down into baby food for you served on an airplane spoon:\n\n > an interface\n\n\"vague statement\".\n\n > a compatible interface to one of our existing coin types \n\n\"a highly specific statement\".\n\nThe vague statement is very wrong, the highly specific statement is correct and clarifies the issue being discussed.\n\nDoes this elucidate the matter for you?", "458" ], [ "How about when a doctor is doing brain surgery. Does he need to be specific or can be be vague. Is vague wrong in that case?\n\nOr how about if you are drunk and trying to hammer a nail into the wall. Vague is like using a wrench instead of a hammer, makes no difference right?\n\nHmm so I guess since there are different meanings and everything is relative, we should be like this guy who gave this company 10,000 dollars without reading their terms of service.\n\nThanks I am walking away having learned something valuable here. \"Do not read and be very blunt and non-specific\". Thanks.", "723" ], [ "> Dude I think damn near everybody in Hong Kong is cunty. Not just the Chinese. What surprises a lot of people is that I found the Chinese in mainland China to be much more polite and accommodating to guests than HK. Yeah mainland do rude things but it’s because they literally don’t know it’s rude because it’s not rude in mainland. But in Hong Kong they’re rude as fuck, they know it, and they don’t give a shit. \n\nHaha well if you think about it, Hong Kong is bound to be the most arrogant place in the world. It's one of the few places where people who are too arrogant for New York City can go. America is not good enough for them so they head to China.\n\nThe sort of guys walking around the rich parts of Hong Kong look like they came out of a magazine. Designer glasses, business suit, fast walking, they are the embodiment of the anti-Christ.\n\nThe Filipinas are the most based people there. Not all of them would drop their pants for a white guy, I seen some hot Filipinas there that were more into Middle Eastern and Chinese guys.\n\nI am back in North America. I cannot afford to live over there all the time. I go there once a year, every year, this year I was in Manila and the Visayas of the Philippines. I like the Philippines a lot, I don't have much to compare it to as I've never been to all those other countries. But it's fairly common for people to have a house in both Thailand and the Philippines. I like the Philippines because they speak English. \n\nOh that is the worse, and then she will complain when I am in the mall and looking at things because I ignore the people in the stalls etc. She will begin to walk without me and act all embarrassed. I mean these people are retarded, capitalism is too new for them. Like I want to look at the shit but I may not want to buy it. I don't know because I haven't had a chance to look at it. But if you look at something the person in the store might get the expectations that you will buy something. So if you look at something you have to buy it, because if you don't then that is a social taboo. So the lesson is, don't look at anything and don't buy anything. The person will stay poor but at least they won't feel insulted. It's retarded. \n\nI have no problem ignoring them when they speak perfect English. It's just business, I don't have enough money to give everyone awesome business and raise the country out of poverty. I spend thousands per month when I am there.\n\nThey don't seem to tip in Asia though, right? I never tipped at all last time I was there.\n\nI'd love to get a house there and live there for a year. I'm going to set aside a certain amount of savings for that in case I lose my job to a computer or something, I'd just take an entire year off. \n\nI might like to buy some land over there and build a compound. If I could get the ball rolling and climb up the social ladder in the economy by leveraging my position here in North America that would be awesome. Winter is forever here.", "79" ], [ "Ah were you part of the mob that decided that? Maybe he did, maybe he didn't, but how do you like killing people in front of children with dogs running around (I watched the video, if you haven't, don't). Yeah yeah you're poor and everything but how do you think you are going to get ahead when you demonstrate mob justice to your children? Seriously a couple of grown men can't say let's take this guy out into a field somewhere and take care of this? It's 2018 not 1464, we can at least do our angry mob killings out of the site of children, please. <PERSON>.", "486" ], [ "Really, was it an act when I immediately had sex with my now wife, then girlfriend, 5 minutes after physically meeting her, in a hotel? All you losers with all your dating techniques etc etc for asexual white women who absolutely do not want to have sex with your loser degenerate virgin ass, if anyone at all. You need to go Asian my dude, then you can just spread out your ass for your girlfriend the first time you meet her or just take an upside down dump (it doesn't matter what you do on the first \"date\"), you can try to grow out that bug beard of yours and watch 1000 marvel films so you are \"cultured\", and all means of faggotry and timewasting.", "1012" ], [ "Did you really go that far back into my post history (bug man) to see me jokingly post some LICHEN (tree moss) and make a joke that said it looks like weed, and actually think that I currently inhale billions of burning atoms of plant material into my precious sacred lungs, to become intoxicated for the purposes of escaping reality?", "406" ], [ "Oh Israel's study eh, yeah that is super trustworthy. They couldn't possibly want all Americans stoned and too dumb to vote for the people who actually want to defend American interests. Let me guess the democratic party is going to unload a whole laundry list of gibmedats and legalized marijuana to win the next election. Because that is what is important, for your little toot to help you forget all the blood you spilled for Israeli interests. Hey dumbie, you don't exactly get my respect for that, pretty sure you could have flipped burgers in Amerika and ended up surviving somehow without having to unleash fury in Israel's enemies, that had nothing to do with Amerika and you should face the facts of your actions soberly, as your victims had to face the lead coming from your bullets soberly and afraid.", "677" ], [ "No, they are real if you planned on your investment producing returns in that quarter, which is generally a highly unreasonable expectation. I bought nano at 6 dollars on December 25, 2017, and I made a reasonably long investment period of a year. \n\nIf you bought nano 3 months ago, hoping that you would be up 200% within 3 months, and now you're down 50%, well you are gonna consider that a loss, but others would just consider you dumb. You are already breaking the laws of reality by expecting a 200% return over a year, let alone 3 months. An average return on the stock market is 10% over a year, you are seeking to do 20 times that. And then you can't even wait the whole year, you want it to perform 4 times faster on top of that.\n\nThis is borderline FUD to be perfectly honest. The one thing that the hold meme has going for it is that it allows your investment period to actually play out, crypto could be locked into a yearly cycle at this point.", "1008" ], [ "If you look at any rich person, they will say a big factor was luck. Now that being said most of us aren't investing enough to make us rich, but if nano got coinbase'd many of us would be able to get some nuisance bills out of the way at the very least. When you look at many stocks, it doesn't really seem like they have that big blow up potential.", "580" ], [ "The last time I bought was 9 dollars and I thought I was buying at the bottom. It had to hover around 5 dollars for a long time now for me to be comfortable buying again, but I always have a new nano goal in terms of my stack size and I am waiting to see what the price will be during the famous \"Sunday dip\", if it's down especially low, I will be happy to buy.", "928" ], [ "Don't say \"you people\", we aren't a bunch of identical niggers here.\n\nWhen I was around 23, my long term white girlfriend broke up with me (she ended up dating lesser men with less education, lesser looks etc etc), so I stayed single for 5 whole years before I met my wife.\n\nThat entire time there was not one girl I met that was worth marrying or dating. \n\nSo stick to banging your cat would be my suggestion, staying single and being able to deal with that misery is key to becoming a person with integrity. All of these pussies out there who go from relationship to relationship to fill a hole in their soul are weak people, and they marry out of necessity, since they are naked, pathetic people in their heart of hearts.", "209" ], [ "Yes, exactly. You save half your income for retirement, even if that means you rent an apartment during retirement because you can't afford a house, and if you can't afford Christmas presents because you wouldn't be able to save for retirement and buy presents at the same time, then you don't buy Christmas presents. And you be religious since materialism is empty. Exactly. \n\nAnything else is the Jews and society as a whole trying to destroy you, like a billion atomic gnomes trying to break through your magic seal and kill you.", "482" ], [ "Well he is arguably a far more effective force than all of these people against him because he did one little thing wrong that he didn't like. Honestly <PERSON> might be the ideal guy because he doesn't obsess over it but he's not afraid to talk about it even though he has more to lose.\n\nLike you can \"know\" of something and openly discuss it and assign some sort of mental priority to it without having to nitpick over every little thing someone does and then just call them a faggot and completely discount their opinion.\n\nHalf this sub ought to send a resume in to CNN honestly they are doing a better job than they are because they're hard at work here.", "495" ], [ "I don't know if I am the only person with an imagination here, but it actually seems like the perfect sort of thing you'd want to fend off a cougar, if you were completely calm.\n\n_URL_0_\n\nNow a key thing would be to get the wheels off, that's asking a lot but it says in the article that the cougar was spooked off for a bit. It doesn't seem unreasonable that you would take a moment to unscrew the wheels of your bike off with your hands.\n\nSo you got that sharp front wheel piece that you could jab into the cat with if it was getting close, then the rest of the bike (bike seat pointed towards your body) could be used to keep a distance between you and the cat. it would force the cat to swipe around the bike, but you'd be jabbing the metal towards the cats face.\n\nI realize that the cat is not just gonna stand there like a boxer and fight you, but you had two guys with bikes so they both could have done this, and they both could have stayed side by side.\n\nThe cat is not just gonna sit on top of a dude tearing him apart while another dude is jabbing the front metal piece of a bike into the cougars eye.\n\nLike to me this seems like a non argument but every single person is arguing here. If these guys didn't panic and were side by side and had the bikes like this, the cat is not just gonna run in and grab onto one dudes neck and kill him instantly before the other dude has a chance to start doing massive damage to the cougars face.\n\nThey are fast but they aren't like as fast as the speed of light with 18 inch long alien teeth made out of carbon nanotubes. \n\nI would say \"definitely\" these guys panicked and handled it the wrong way in order for one of them to get killed. It was the bad way to handle it. The story did not say \"they fought it valiantly together, until one friend was killed and the other was forced to break formation and run\", and that's how the story should have gone. \n\nThe story did not say that. I really can't be wrong here because the cougar is not gonna kill both of them, it's gonna kill one and drag it to its lair, no matter what, unless it is killed.", "111" ], [ "Most punks are liberals in favor of universal income and crap like that, they are the first to go begging for 15 dollar minimum gibs. It's a form of \"rebellion\" fed to them against the baby boomers, so they can agree with their parents and think their parents are \"cooler than they thought\", it is so pathetic. Yeah be rebellious, just dress in a leather jacket and get a tattoo and you need a mohawk there, perfect, now you're rebelling, you fit the image perfectly!", "871" ], [ "I'm hungry as hell right now, I fast 21 hours every single day. I think sugar has a massive impact on the senses, as far as deadening them. Like you won't be able to taste and smell nearly as well if you eat a lot of sugar. When taken to its extreme, if you eat enough sugar you won't be able to feel anything in your feet or hands when you have diabetes, so there must be some sort of scale here. With almost no sugar, you will be able to taste all the sugar in pizza sauce when you eat pizza. My sense of smell is highly amplified with keto and 21 hour fasts. It's not every day I'm hungry, some days I'm not even hungry after a 21 hour fast. If you work out a lot, you will be almost too hungry. But its not even that big of a deal, I think the way to do it is to do all your cooking on one day and have all your meals ready for the next 20 days, rinse repeat.", "978" ], [ "It's not even strict. You need to study <PERSON> and his Critique of Pure Reasoning. No one has ever written anything disproving what he wrote. It's a thick and complicated text so you might as well just study the \"a priori\" part:\n\n_URL_0_\n\nSo study that and understand what it is.\n\nThen ask yourself where your philosophy is coming from. When did it occur to you to start behaving as you do?\n\nYou certainly did not think about kissing a girl anywhere other than on the mouth as a child. The a priori way of dealing with a woman is that eyes connect with eyes, mouth connects with mouth, penis connects with vagina. \n\nThat's how the properly functioning human brain works.\n\nAnd, if you want to make anything decent out of your life, you have a husband and wife who have a household with rules, they may or may not have children, and they are to be raised properly etc.\n\nThis is basic stuff, just because you are making a mess out of your life doesn't mean that you're living an \"alternative lifestyle\". Your brain is just not working correctly.\n\nThere is no arguing some points, it's not some moral debate. If you are injecting heroin into your veins, don't start talking about how it's \"safe\" and you tested it to make sure it's pure. That's not the point. Likewise OK you want to stick your penis in a woman's filthy anus that can never totally be cleaned, that's no different than sticking it in a man's anus, then at that point there is no right or wrong.\n\nLike where is the god damn line. I'm telling you where it is, I'm not asking you I am telling you.", "230" ], [ "Well I think that many different models for the future would work if people took even a little personal responsibility. No one is told that they have an ego and that they are responsible for meditating on it and eliminating it. It's unheard of, no one has ever even heard of that before. But it's incredibly basic. \n\nLike where is the actual source of human life even coming from, what is it filtering through before it starts manifesting in physical existence? \n\nLike someone is CNN and charging themselves up with all sorts of retarded propaganda that they will be very enthusiastic about, but WHO or WHAT is watching that, what egos is that feeding into?\n\nLike there is zero interest on their behalf about that. If we are making errors and we can recognize that we are responsible for our own defects, then we can accommodate a lot. Really we are not gonna need any particular system to rely upon because we're just gonna be more efficient with our lot in life.\n\nPeople wouldn't start thinking about needing to kill other people if they realized that they could stop believing in that which wants to kill other people. Like some liberals are wanting to punch a \"nazi\", they are becoming so fortified in their beliefs. Or some people are so identified with being white, \"that is who they are\". They ARE their skin color, if they took a big dose of silver and turned blue like [this white man who turned blue](_URL_0_), then they would die. \n\nIt's just so absurd how superficial they are, since they base their entire philosophy in sensatory perception. That's all our systems are based on, looks.", "142" ], [ "You don't even need to eat like 5 times a day either, I recently realized that you can eat one big meal (keto, chicken and vegetables), and then go 21 hours without eating, you'll be maybe hungry for 3 hours but maybe hunger is something that is not bad to feel. You learn better with an empty stomach. And there is no way you won't lose weight like this, even if you fail at your diet and completely pig out on whatever once a week.\n\nSo honestly, they don't really know how to buy and eat, do they? They are doing that wrong too.", "727" ], [ "I got this down to a science. Have you ever heard of prebiotics? I run the subreddit prebiotics.\n\nSo probiotics feed the good bacteria in the small intestine and prebiotics feed the large intestine.\n\nI'm not gonna rewrite all of it here so read up on it.\n\nI recommend takin the niacin on an empty stomach. It upregulates BDNF, which is a good thing. They looked at the brain of people that committed suicide and found that BDNF was heavily downregulated, so basically taking niacin is doing the opposite of making you kill yourself.\n\nThe niacin* flush on an empty stomach can be intense though. Especially when you are fasting for 21 hours a day and only eating a strict keto diet like me, I get the chills and shivers and everything from it so I only do it a couple times a week.\n\nI take me fish oilies after I eat my keto food, along with some coconut oil.\n\nYou want to be doing all this stuff:\n\n_URL_0_\n\nMake sure your fish oil is decent, meaning high in DHA.\n\nZinc doesn't do anything making it worthwhile*.\n\nA lot of supplements don't do anything. I only take the supplements that do something.\n\nI take 2400 MG of SAM-e per day, which is a lot, and quite expensive, but it dramatically improves my mood and makes me a different person. Your mileage will vary depending on your genetics, guaranteed.\n\nVitamin D is amazing and I take 5000 UI once every couple of days but not every single day.\n\nI wouldn't bother with 5-htp.\n\nI would take 500 mg of magnesium before you sleep because your sleep will be better. Psyllium husk also seems to help with sleep. \n\nDeep sleep is very important and you could consider your deep sleep to be the most productive hours of your day.\n\nI would limit caffeine to under 400 mg per day, I take a 200mg caffeine pill after waking along with my SAM-e on an empty stomach and then another one a couple hours of later or a starbucks coffee a couple hours later, then I stop for the rest of the day. I might have some green tea but thats it.\n\nThat about covers most of it. I occasionally take cranberry extract etc and just different random supplements to shake things up. But that is most of what I do. I'll be a normal weight with this diet on the long term and incredibly smart. \n\nThere are some other things you need to succeed, I would look for that book on Amazon that suggest you need to work 10x harder to succeed, I forget the name by <PERSON> or something, and I would read the book called \"Deep work\" and understand how important it is not to get distracted when you are doing something.\n\nYou don't have to follow the 10x book to the letter, just kind of get the gist of the book, the deep work book though, that's more important.\n\nAnd if you do all of that stuff, you will be basically taking like 20 years of my hard work and experimentation and just putting it all into practice immediately, for free. It cost me a lot of time and energy and money to figure all this out. A lot of bottles of supplements that just went in the trash because they didn't actually do anything.\n\nThis is all stuff that seems to improve HDL cholesterol levels, interestingly enough, the SAM-e part might need to be tweeked because I did that in response to my genetics test.", "727" ], [ "Nano has been falling in price all throughout an economic boom. By your logic, nano will actually be entering into the negative territory, which means that anyone who bought nano will have to personally end up paying <PERSON> the negative balance left on their account.\n\nStocks have been going up in a way that doesn't make any sense. When news starts going around that people are being locked out of their account, they are gonna haul all their money out of their bank accounts and shove it in crypto. \n\nAt that point its going to moon insanely, and you could sell at the top of that and very quickly buy a house or something if you have enough nano.\n\nBy you saying what you are saying, you are just telling me that they can print money again and play around with interest rates and that will get us out of the next recession this time around. Sorry honey but it's not really quite that simple.\n\nNano is already down quite a lot. It's squeezing juice from a rock at this point. Meanwhile in the stock market:\n\n\"Dow hitting 50,000 by 2023? Market milestone is within reach, investor claims\"\n\nRemember when people were saying Bitcoin would hit a million dollars? What happened after that?\n\nWhere is all this bullishness coming from when there tends to be a financial crash every 7-8 years?\n\nAnd how are you going to just print more money and raise interest rates to correct that recession?\n\n > I love Nano but betting on this coin to get you through a recession is wishful thinking.\n\nYou applied literally no thought to this statement whatsoever. You literally just said it, you just spewed words into the air. That's nice and all but we're not actually in the recession right now and you don't actually have to think about your future right now. It would be a very scary time.", "1008" ], [ "> And if things get bad enough that fiat becomes worthless then you can assume that ISPs, CDNs, undersea cable companies and cellular providers will probably shut down too. \n\nThat is the opposite of what would happen. The US military would literally be out there protecting those cables.\n\nGuess what happens when things get really bad? Like in a World War? You send military to defend your oil refineries etc, because those are very important.\n\nYou are literally just saying things that run contrary to world history. It is not this huge massive expense to keep the internet running, the government could just take over operations of those companies in an emergency.\n\n > So few people get this. If fiat crashes, people are unlikely to throw what they have into crypto on the chance that it somehow becomes the primary worldwide currency. \n\nAre they gonna use it to buy bread? They are going to need a barrel full.\n\n > And finally, unless the new currency is accessible to all and equally shared, then it won’t be adopted. If the world is fucked and 5% hold all the wealth, then the 95% will find another measure of wealth.\n\nThat is wishful thinking because those 95% are sheep, they literally don't have the capacity to follow any sort of unique thinking. If someone with enough power says something is true, then it might as well be true.\n\nBitcoin, nano etc don't run contrary to such ideas which is what would make them useful. Nano can't really get much lower, it is going lower during an economic boom, so by any logic it should take off when things get tough. \n\n > This isn’t a nano argument. Even Bitcoin will die if things get that bad.\n\nNot everything is gonna die dude. Gold is gonna go up. Bitcoin is something that is new but just because we're not sure and it hasn't been tested doesn't mean it won't go up.\n\nI mean you want to literally bet against everything during a recession because things are gonna be bad. That's the safe bet because you have the highest chance of being right. In a recession, most things tend to go down, wow so few people get this.\n\nYou have yet to explain what a panicking family is gonna do when they hear their friend's bank has shut them out of their account and now they can only withdrawal 100 or 50 dollars a day.\n\nMeanwhile crypto is hypothetically mooning, he can put his money into that AND take it out whenever he wants, he will probably end up making a lot of money in the short term, it's risky but his friend who is locked out of his own bank account might have already hypothetically lost his money.\n\nOr, alternatively, in a carebear land scenario, this sort of thing can never happen, and stocks will continue to moon insanely for next couple of years, with no chance of ever coming down.\n\nYou can think what you wanna think dude.", "1008" ], [ "Part of the reason for the poor attitude is a) people who are constantly shitting themselves over the price, and b) close minded people who think they are \"very grounded\".\n\nThen there is I guess the third category of people who think that the conversation going on in this sub makes a huge difference in price.\n\nThe serious people have no choice but to mock all these groups, they will say its mooning and make all sorts of memes. We already know how this coin behaves during a bear market and we aren't buying for the bear market. \n\nWill there ever be a bull market? Who knows. Really investing in nano is a form of security, as bitcoin will not be the long term future in say, 30-40 years. No one wants to be a nocoiner who missed out on something and is telling their grandkids about what they could have been.\n\nWhen it is just the memers left in this sub, talking about how we're gonna moon when the coin is at 2.00, then I bet we will explode. At that point all the fools will have sold off and only the wise will be left.", "1008" ], [ "Nano used to be a number 18 coin. Verge is above it right now, it undergoes 51% attacks or whatever every other day. During a recession, things would make much more sense. Verge would not be above nano for example. That is when the practical value would be prioritized in peoples minds. In a way, its exactly what nano would need to get up in the top 5 spot.\n\nIt's hardly delusional, do you honestly think that this coin, even if it has wallets, is gonna just climb up in this environment, when it can't even get past verge, without some huge outside factors?\n\nThose outside factors could be a reality soon. Nano is very practical and its the people's coin. You can take your 10 grand out of your bank account and put it in nano and send it to people. \n\nIf it's lower that actually provides more stability, nano didn't stay at 30 dollars for long. So yeah thats another thing, if nano is only 25 cents, people would flock to it. It would have a huge value proposition and not any downside. \n\nSo yeah that's delusional. If nano was 25 cents each and you say, hmmm I feel my money is not safe in a bank, nano has no downside maybe it will be safe there, that's delusional. It's not, it's smart.", "170" ], [ "The price won't go to zero. Any time you're thinking of buying something when its that low it has tremendous upside.\n\nIt can't get past verge because it has no marketing. Verge has marketing. There is no point in marketing it if it can't even get its wallets on the Apple store.\n\nWe are going in circles here. \n\nNo, it doesn't need a big partnership, I think it will do well in a recession if it gets really bad. There would be an initial sell off.\n\nHave anything novel to say? I know you can type.", "618" ], [ "If there was a huge recession and some practical coins became popular (bitcoin, nano, etc) and all the banks were really screwed up and you could only withdrawal 50 or 100 dollars per day, and everyone lost their jobs but hauled a lot of money out of their banks and put it into crypto which is relatively stable due to the situation, and they are on their cellphones sending money to each other and maybe let's say the world is starting to really adopt crypto now, people are gonna start comparing it. \"Bitcoin took 4 hours, I lost a lot of money in late fees\" etc, they will be talking to their friends.\n\nLike everyone says that sounds ludicrous but no, I really insist it's not a matter as to if it will happen, but as to when.", "1008" ], [ "I got an entire subreddit dedicated to going into atomic depth about this stuff. Here is a picture of one of the food containers I eat per day:\n\n_URL_0_\n\nThen I have another one where I cut up red, orange and yellow peppers into thirds, and pick two colors (2/3 of a pepper) and cut it up Greek style, and then I cook like 18 chicken breasts and put 2 of each into one of those metal containers, and then the peppers on top of it. When I go to eat I put some chipolte tabasco sauce on the chicken breasts and some pamenara cheese on it and put it in the oven for an hour and a half at 200F. The vegetables same deal but they stay in the oven a bit longer.\n\nSo I cook all the food in one day and it lasts me about 20 days. I also cook turkey and beef burgers etc and put it in these containers because you need some variety.\n\nAlso this is kind of a pilot, while I am losing weight, I am losing it a bit slower cuz of the carrots that have sugar in them etc, I just have to get rid of all the vegetable packs in the freezer. So I'm gonna switch over to broccoli next time which is more ketogenic, as well as green beans etc. \n\nBut this is a great way to handle it, you can probably end up only having to cook once a month, and not having to do any dishes etc other than that one time per month (a lot of dishes at one time, a huge mess is made cooking in advance for 20-30 days).", "967" ], [ "Yeah it is stored in the gut and he's pretty smart to know that much, dude is an articulate smart dude, but honestly if you wanted to have a higher rate of serotonin you would do something like eat a ton of tyrosine and carbs, and the carbs reduce the competition for the tyrosine which gets converted into serotonin and all.\n\nWhich is nice but not really the point.\n\nIdeally you want to avoid a lot of carbs and not even really worry about your brain chemistry, I just load up on SAM-e and that helps produce a ton of neurotransmitters, and I just manually try to control my mood, like I notice I am going a bit off the deep end I try to manually scale that back.\n\nIts easier to do that then feel depressed and try to manually increase serotonin etc, at that point you are really screwed.\n\nGenerally when you run into problems its because you've been eating way too much beef, which causes a lot of anger, lust, inertia (laziness).\n\nOnce you get used to fish oil, SAM-e, vitamin D etc it becomes a lot more managable. It can be a little tough to manage in the beginning if you are prone to depression/bipolar.\n\nBut I'd say that stuff probably helps sort out your brain, the guys that have really bad bipolar are the guys jacking off and smoking weed and not eating right and not taking fish oil etc.\n\nIf you take care of yourself for long enough, you merely become to rambunctious at times and its evident. What is not evident is when you get angry or lustful etc because you become identified with that lust and anger and you go with it, then you can get in a lot of trouble with your spouse or do something stupid like watch porn.\n\nSet schedule for sleeping is key as <PERSON> has said. Anything you can get down to the minute is amazing. I have a specific time I go to sleep (not strict), time I eat (strict to the minute), etc. increased strictness of timing is a sign of increased \"having it together\". The body craves regularity. You are not a machine but your body is.", "398" ], [ "Yeah you've been very happy since that 30 dollars and you made sure that everyone that didn't sell at 30 dollars knows that. Yeah you are not the only person who knows about linear time but if you can read between the lines here I am offering two possible scenarios where nano does well: if there is another bull run, and if there is a big recession where banks get in trouble and people potentially run to crypto.\n\nI don't have a crystal ball to give you firm unreasonable guarantees like you are asking for from my theories its just a theory. \n\nYou are not the only person who made some profit, I bought litecoin at 100 and sold it when <PERSON> sold his. I bought vechain at 2.50 and sold it at like 8.50. All of that got reinvested into nano which was only ever bought for reasonable prices like 6 dollars, 9 dollars, etc.\n\nI am not going into the litecoin forums and shitting all over their coin as I have sold my position in it, for some reason people really feel a need to come back and shit all over nano. Is it because it is trying to be bigger and better than other coins out there? Can you tell me why you feel the need to do it?", "928" ], [ "> I agree with almost all your points. However, I dont concede with your argument on oral sex. As a child, I didnt think about kissing girls at all. I thought they were icky and that they had cooties. I thought a lot of things as a child that didn't pan out. That argument doesnt stand for me so far.\n\nI had walked with a girl holding her hand all the way to the bus, I didn't know about those nasty and unnecessary things. I obviously wasn't kissing girls because I was 5 but I disagree, the basic idea was there and it wasn't abnormal. I was not like \"girls have cooties\", that was also a social thing. Unless people started making fun of it then you start acting like you wouldn't normally act when you were with your friend who is a girl. Maybe you just didn't have a friend who was a girl when you were 5, I did.\n\n > I dont think there is an issue with stimulating someone you love in a way you both enjoy, so long as it does not perpetuate unhealthy thoughts, actions, or consequences. I think its your right to believe oral sex is illogical, but the grounds for your argument are anecdotal at best. \n\nOral sex fries the chakras of the throat and in the sex. You can't be a surgeon and open people up and find these chakras. \n\nNevertheless, the human is degenerating, we have gone from speaking beautiful languages like Ancient Greek, Latin, Sanskrit, to watching <PERSON> butcher the English language for half a billion views on YouTube.\n\nMoreover you will actually come to this forum complaining about it.\n\nWhere is the root of this problem? Bring forth your scientists if you have some better solution to this problem. You blame it on \"racial inbreeding\" in a pathetic attempt to explain it.\n\nIt's your degenerated sexuality causing this. When <PERSON> got to the point of banning degenerate art from homosexuals he was on to something. You engage in sodomy like the homosexuals.\n\n > I've never done anal, and dont care to. \n\nYeah it's almost literally sticking your ass in a diaper, instead of cloth you have skin backing the fecal matter. If they know how to clean themselves they can only clean themselves to an extent.\n\nNext up: cunnilingus. Why would you want to do that? Go to your fridge, find some roast beef, start licking that meat. You're nuts.\n\nLastly: Oral sex on the man: you would not do that with a woman you love. If you're incapable of loving, which is high, then you might call your lust love. But its just not something you would want with your real wife. You just wouldn't.\n\nMany people say \"this is my wife, I am in an open relationship\", I don't care what brand of insanity you subscribe to, there are a lot of nuts out there.\n\n > Its possible to be healthy and stable even if you occasionally sleep with a girl you trust and respect or give oral sex to a loved one. I know that likely goes against what you know and believe, and is unsettling.\n\nIt's not unsettling, it just makes you average. I know you are frying your subtle energetic systems which you aren't even aware of. You're a blind maggot in a pile of blind maggots, you're hooked up to the Matrix basically, your eyes are closed. You are a battery for the earth, your job is to procreate and then die so that nature can continue. That's all.\n\n > By your arguments, we should only have sex in missionary and not even touch our partners erogenous zones.\n\nYou sound like a faggot here. You sound like you can't even wipe your own ass without masturbating. You sound like an old 60 year old liberal sexual education teacher. Get your shit together.\n\n > I dont believe either of us has one, but I will concede this - you have lived life how you feel it is best lived, and that deserves commendation. Its too rare a thing, these days, to truly be healthy and stable \n\nYou don't say, maybe that's why I have to pay for so many mentally ill retards on welfare", "524" ], [ "I am not sure if you are baiting me to get off topic and banned or something, this is not on topic. But I will super briefly answer your question (my wife is another ethnicity btw), most people don't seem to care that trillions of dollars are being spent on Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc etc etc, or they are ineffectual, etc otherwise retarded to deal with. Meanwhile the left supports abortion which unfairly targets blacks, which is an actual eugenics program. There is no where else for a person with a brain to go at this point.", "819" ], [ "> Acknowledging that every single positive prediction for the last five months has been wrong is not “shitting all over nano”. It’s acknowledging that something is wrong, and that just burying our heads in the sand and making jokes is not going to fix things. \n\nYeah but at the same time bitcoin has not been performing great. Realistically it could be above 10k in maybe 4-5 weeks. The thing was that it has been slow going to break through that barrier, it did actually cross it at one point but that is actually the true trajectory for bitcoin which is still up.\n\nThe trajectory for bitcoin is not 6000 dollars in other words.\n\nAnd you always value nano in accordance with bitcoin and the shit always hits the fan with nano when bitcoin is having a tough time, irrationally so. It suffers due to being an alt coin, but people also irrationally sell off their nano at a higher rate than other alts when there is any bad news.\n\nBut you see, the general trajectory is still bullish for nano, because bitcoin is headed to 10,000 and just taking a long time to get there, it is not headed to 6000.\n\nSo do you see why people are persistently bullish? I need to repeat it one more time, its just taking a long time to get to 10k.\n\nIf you think that is delusional or not, thats another worthwhile discussion, but see you are still casting doom and gloom when we are merely tacking weeks onto the timeline here (assuming the 10k thing is true), while the prices are indicating that people think it will NEVER go back into a bull run, which means its oversold.\n\nBitcoin is oversold, even. After an enormous amount of FUD it still hit 10k, again. It will get to 10k again for sure, especially with the economy being on fire right now. Look at the S and P 500. Everything just keeps going up forever.", "1008" ], [ "My great grandfather built up his family an entire business. My grandfather lives in the house he was born in. His sons work in that business and their sons work in that business. You see the pattern here? It is parasitic to charge your children rent as long as they are working or trying to make major improvements to themselves. You are saying \"this all stops here, I am gonna greedily take everything for myself even the happiness this little bit of wealth provides me is providing far diminishing returns than it is worth\".\n\nYou don't care either though this is mostly for other people. I doubt you're even white by the way you type.", "224" ], [ "OK so I am willing to bet you don't have a degree etc and despite all of the bullshitting here from 30 year old people, you actually meet real people who actually live in society and they talk about how they wish they had just gone to university and studied to become a lawyer. \n\nSo wow you get your little job and you have your little apartment and you pay your own cable bill. Congratulations that is really hard. Now 30 years is gonna go by, and because you didn't live with mommy and daddy and go to university, guess where you still are?\n\nBut yeah it would be terrible if your kids had their own house or something nice in the future. It's better if they learn how to stay in an apartment and never save anything for retirement.", "259" ], [ "All alts go up when bitcoin goes up, its not that special. The more satoshis it loses, the more it gains, the more upside there is.\n\nAll I care about in a bear market is how low the price can go. Although nano has a terrible bear market reputation.\n\nIn a bull market everything changes and things are forgotten overnight. I'm buying for then, not now. I do stand by what I've said, nano dropped under 30 position so now it has a really bad reputation and forget about days of seeing nano up 20%, it will probably go way down now but I say bitcoin will crack 10k again in 5 weeks and that could trigger a bull run if it manages to plow through it. In which case nano will soar.", "1008" ], [ "That is actually BS. Nothing can really change your DNA, that's not how it works. Well maybe you can smoke cigars like <PERSON> does and it will mutate or damage your DNA, that's how it changes.\n\nEating a Mars bar can change your epigenetic regulation unfavorably, which is definitely bad. But its not permanent and yeah, if you are gonna sound smart at least try to be right. And yes its actually very productive to figure all this stuff out. Helps against alcoholism and many ailments.", "833" ], [ "600 dollar rent for a child is not cheap. It's very limiting. You definitely are in an area where higher paying job opportunities are more common and probably have a sweet deal on the rent. A ton of people go to trade school and basically get ripped off, as they are unable to advance to journeyman etc because no one will hire them, because they will be forced to pay a higher wage. You need an oil boom market to advance and that requires moving, at that point you won't need your own place because you'll be living and working on premises.\n\nBasically everything you are saying here is situational, so you are saying you got lucky in other words. Plus you needed this to work out, if you weren't the right fit for trade school (only a certain TYPE of person gets through that, not including me, as I was not the right fit), again if you were not the right fit for that and you were ultimately rejected from the professional, you would be totally screwed. \n\nIf you are smart you go to university, because you'll probably get through it regardless of what sort of personality you have, and you'll always be able to get at least a mediocre job because of that and cover rent.\n\nYou took a big risk and you're lucky it didn't backfire, congratulations. Two risks honestly, the housing market could have crashed and the value of apartment could have went to nihil.", "932" ], [ "Their brains are not finished developing until like 25, and your never was fully developed and I sincerely mean that. You have a stunted mental development and you serve as a prime example of why not to abuse your 22 year old CHILD like that. Its a tough pill to swallow but yeah you keep your kid until 25 in your house, in university, if that's what it takes, to protect your gene line and make sure its not all retarded. And if you did any good job raising your kids it will be a pleasure to do so, not this misery and burden of having a half retarded child such as yourself.", "881" ], [ "You sound like you are nuts to be honest. If you have to go into a paragraph because a woman stepped out of a strictly regimental societal code of egocentrism, then you are nuts. You are like one of these loners on YouTube that do vlogs because they haven't gotten laid and they are 33. Maybe you are a virgin.\n\nListen up tard-muffin: You are in a relaxed social environment, you just do something to jive and be cool and you don't read into it like an insane person. It doesn't mean you are a cuck, a black man didn't come over and have sex with your wife. What is wrong with people?", "98" ], [ "That dude was sayin 600 dollars. Now his mom was a single mom so that is a little bit different. But that's way above going market rate. Going market rate is like 400-500 dollars for a single room. Effectively maybe she charged 300 (he said she was saving 300 out of each 600 dollars), which is not far off market rate.\n\nAnd honestly if your parents are charging just under market rate, it might be better to actually just pay the market rate and get them out of your faces because you won't want to look at them.\n\nMeanwhile if they are charging you zero, yes everything should be going along swimmingly, because they have their pensions, they never retire, they had a 20% interest savings account growing up and working at your age, etc etc so they got their fair share and they are profiting off your future that was sold down the river.\n\n300-400-500 these are not negligible expenses. Baby boomer are fat as shit, they can't shop, they can't put dishes in the dishwasher correctly they put the spoons and forks facing down. With 300 dollars you could get entire keto groceries for a month and stop being a fat ass.\n\nBasically the summary of everyones argument here is, kick out your kids so they are retarded, have no degree, have no future. OK. Why? A lot of kids are in and out of the house for work, and just home for the weekends like 3 days a week. It's kind of like they are visiting for the weekend every week.", "488" ], [ "Blacks love yammering and jabbering and throwing their long limbs about, with their long weird ass fingers twiggling around like a praying mantis, their eyes beady like an insect, dancing and wogging along to jazz music while some Jew sits back in the corner of the theater, everything is going well. It's giving the black what it wants. It wants movement, it's like a T-rex, it can only see movement.", "957" ], [ "> Yes. <PERSON>. There was one of him, and nobody else was even remotely close to him, and nobody would be doing that now especially, considering anyone into AC is older and has a life. Pragmatically impossible. \n\nWell you are making assumptions here, they are older and have a life as programmers and would attempt to do it with automation. The way you solve that is by having only droppable armor, like you were saying, and it would not be a problem on the Darktide server (which is the utmost concern imo). We just need to reduce it down to 3 dungeons where you hunt when you are a high level, that was a big problem like housing wherein you could go to 10 different places to hunt high level XP.\n\nHonestly I think coral golems were a bigger problem than housing. These special places where people could set up macros. I made friends with an Asian girl, the sister of a core in GEN, a major early darktide guild, and she showed me this spot where you could jump, an invisible perch in the air, and macro vapor golems, their magic bolts couldn't even hit you. BSD on the other hand was simple, actual human players would come in and find you. \n\nIt needs to be like that where there is no place to escape from actual players, to allow the playerbase to police itself.\n\nSo that phenomenon was actually maybe worse than housing. Housing is basically a mule spot out in the middle of nowhere. It's not where you actually have to go to hunt. The fact that they spread out high level XP spots was a critical failure. Too many developers that didn't know how to play the game.\n\n60 was pretty high for the time period I was thinking of, of course you go beyond that then 80 or 100 is considered high. We are getting into the time of insane darktide XP chains where even I was getting to levels like 106. \n\nI was hacking into accounts and getting PPGSC and all this insane armor. I was one of the few to survive the early invoker quest runs, out of 300 people, I was one of 16 that made it. After I had gotten it, I become indomitable. \n\nSo that was the point in the S curve where the game became wildly unbalanced because I was 2 and 3 shotting everyone, I was having the time of my life getting revenge on all my old enemies. \n\nBut that is not something that is sustainable, and the population declined after that.\n\nAC prior to housing was basically perfect, but I feel too many people blame housing itself rather than the dozens of MAJOR changes that occurred right along with housing. The new higher XP dungeons, the new armor types, the new magic spells.\n\nCripple blow is something you put on monster dropped items to give like 2-3x crit damage or something. \n\nThey did do a decent job at rebalancing the game for all the luminance and all that stuff, but it just made the game into a Korean grindfest basically. Even when no lifers like me who had no job and no prospects, I was still unable to grind to the max levels.", "656" ], [ "I view diet for normal average people without disease to be cyclical, with \"bulking\" and \"cutting\" phases being somewhat natural. It's hard for average overweight people to find diets that maintain and sustain a low weight, if this was not the case then most people would not be gaining more and more weight year after year which is statistically the case; therefore there are times when it makes sense to exclude high carb potatoes in order to lose weight, other times when it might make more sense to include them. Sometimes putting on a bit of extra weight makes sense in order to deal with a stressful life. Other times people can have the focus on their health to get in pristine condition, in times like these I would personally cut potatoes due to the high number of carbs.", "261" ], [ "You seem a little sure of yourself, in general, I am a little skeptical when people think they can attribute blame all on one particular thing (histamines in this case). I would not be so sweeping and radical when trying to figure things like this out, I say this from much experience and by the fact that I went balls to the wall taking huge amounts of various kinds of fiber. Taking large amounts of resistant starch will probably induce dysbiosis and make you actually sick, at least passing enormous amounts of gas, having 5 bowel movements a day until you turn your bottom inside out, etc.\n\nAnd I think you would have considerable difficulty explaining to me how these three things relate to each other: caffeine, butyrate from resistant starch, and histamine.\n\nYou just seem sweeping in your actions in general. There are some times when this is useful and other times when it is not useful. When quitting tobacco it seemed to be useful for you. But now you are facing the sting of your actions. Caffeine is VERY hard to quit. \n\nA better way to quit caffeine would be buying a bottle of caffeine pills and just take one in the morning before you go to work and don't bring caffeine to work. After you get used to that for a couple of weeks, start taking half a caffeine pill. And then after a couple of weeks break it into quarters, or just quit at that point, taper yourself off it in other words.\n\nYou can buy raw green banana flour at a bulk food store, this is the powder that has the most resistant starch in it. You need to be careful with it because it makes this very fine dust that you could breathe in or get in your eyes and its really viscous. You can mix it in with a shake or some yogurt or something wet and get large amounts of resistant starch into your system that way.\n\nIf this does do something, you have to ask what your end game here is because you may very well end up with gas issues etc which is going to be a new problem you've created that didn't exist before, then how are you going to treat that, when it is solving the problem from caffeine?\n\nModeration is implied here, you see the maximum benefits from prebiotics when they are spread out, and skipped on somedays, sometimes you take a lot sometimes only a little, etc you get a feel for it and it falls into your lifestyle.\n\nI recommend ordering Bimuno off their website or Amazon, whatever is cheaper and easier for you, the little power sachets are very useful over the months and years... its not a big butyrate producer like resistant starch but noticable in keeping an active healthy lifestyle.", "346" ], [ "I take 2400 MG of SAM-e per day as a result of viewing my gene methylation information. Methylfolate makes me feel sick although it seems to be recommended for me, and it was frickin expensive for a bottle, like 60 bucks. All the special methyl supplements seem expensive.\n\nI recommend SAM-e because it has been the number one life altering supplement that I've ever taken. It makes me a different person, full of energy, focused, relatively consistent. Combats depression and other issues which people have, dramatically so. It overrides so many issues that average people run into. 2400 is 6 x 400MG, good quality 400MG is quite expensive, like 50 bucks for 60 400MG tablets, so 50 bucks every 10 days.\n\nAlmost no one would probably take that many though, the recommendation is 1 per day so I take like 6x the daily recommendation. So you start with the daily recommendation, and you take more to see if it improves things. For me I can get up to 6 before it starts getting to be too much and having adverse consequences.", "711" ], [ "> Bro, how many times can I say this? UAM/AUTOMATION SHOULD EQUAL AN INSTANT BAN\n > \n > Don't make me ever type that again, please. \n\nYou didn't even know what Crippling Blow was. You are very naive in how active Asheron's Call players actually behave. We do care about what someone who played the game 15 years ago might think, but we don't think you will actually play with us so on the other hand, we don't really care. You are like a baby boomer commenting on new technology, almost universally out of touch and clueless. No offense but this is the real observation.\n\nYou are not even reading what I am writing here, I specifically wrote out that I was wearing pre-patch greater shadow armor back in the day. If you aren't even reading what I am writing then I am wasting my time here. I recommend you play the Asheron's Call emulator and get to level 50 in modern AC, it's not as bad as you are making it out to be. Some of your recommendations are relevant and aligned with my thinking, much of it is unrealistic and naive.", "439" ], [ "> I am sure of myself except when I'm not. When I'm not sure of myself what I feel is an oppressive debilitating weight of society and all its institutions on me, so I survive better being self assured (that doesn't mean I know I'm right, far from it, I am in a constant state of knowing what I know may actually be wrong)\n\nWell this is how you learn things worthwhile, and you are in the right place, all I am saying is that many problems can be avoided by just slowly phasing in and out of things, particularly with caffeine and prebiotics, the gut and brain take some time to adjust and you want to take it easy on them.\n\n > In any case, just looking for methods of preparing whole foods for RS since ive hit ideal weight or very close to it and now I'm looking to improve my health in other ways.\n\nI would recommend hitting \"next page\" on the main prebiotics forum and go back where where I was making all the prebiotics shakes etc. Please note that they are pretty much for the normal gut to handle but you can get some idea of what I was engineering in order to get the stuff into the gut.\n\nHere is one example:\n\n_URL_0_\n\n > The butyrate is supposed to have a mast cell protective property and a leaky gut can apparently cause more histamine problems. I don't know\n\nYou are probably on to something here, I've read stuff like that and went ??? and went on in my reading,but it wasn't relevant to me at the time. It doesn't mean you aren't on the right track :)", "327" ], [ "duh anyone who can see the pattern of how bitcoin grows during the year and peaks during December could see this coming. Although there is room for <PERSON> or something to crash the market, that's what you gotta be on the lookout for since he said he was entering into this market and he is the man famous for shorting the British Pound. \n\nSo we want to ask how to avoid that, do we get out early or does anyone think he has the ability, or what price are we gonna get to if it does outdo next year? Thoughts?", "1008" ], [ "Also note that this is what causes bitcoin to drop and the market to crash and enter into a bear cycle. So, has the new tech (forget the name) made it so that bitcoin has 50 cent fees? Let's forget the 5 hour transaction time or whatever, assume that people do not care about that for a second.\n\nWhen bitcoin fees get up that high, sell all your crypto imo. buy again after the short dip, sell again in the bull trap, then wait until the bottom of the bear market to reinvest everything back in.", "1008" ], [ "I am not sure why everyone is so hard on Firano. There isn't even any evidence to point to him being a scammer. There was a problem with the code in his exchange and whilst he may be an idiot, he is not necessarily a scammer. The real scammers post here about withdrawing 3000 nano and getting 6000 nano. At worse people here would say \"you should do the right thing and give it back\". The legal proceedings will determine if the dude actually profited from the defects in the code. And yeah people will say \"he is responsible for the code and security of his exchange\", but this is after everyone buying Raiblocks abused another exchange until they were kicked off it, and there were only two exchanges that would put up with the shit and abuse of the Raiblocks crowd, perhaps because they couldn't understand what was being said to them in English. \n\nI appreciate wanting to put a face to the blame, and again he certainly was an idiot, but the real criminals are floating around here, they are the only ones who openly have said they have unethically profited. And for all of those wide-eyed about Firano's legitimate profits and large account, what is to stop him from converting it all to Monero and boarding a plane to Morocco?", "831" ], [ "Well you should Google the Gnostic Teachings site and figure it out there, I am not the best representative of this stuff and am blatantly violating a lot of their standards here. But that's where I learned about the oral sex thing, because your mouth handles a certain \"voltage\" for lack of a better word, and your sexual organs have a very high voltage. But they are both sexual. \n\nMouth hair only grows around the man's mouth because it's a feminine sexual organ, but the womans chest is the projective sexual organ. The man's penis is a sexual projective organ and the woman's vagina is a sexual receptive organ. \n\nSo you see its retarded to lick a woman's vagina because A) she doesn't care and doesn't need it and a woman who dumps you because you will not provide oral sex is 100% worth losing, and for that matter you don't truly really care b) Your feminine male mouth, which is a sexual organ that has hair growing around it, connects with the female sexual organ, and it's the same as when you connect the incorrect polarities when you are trying to charge someone elses car with your car battery:\n\n_URL_0_", "524" ], [ "Honestly I have no idea, some people that come into this subreddit are so wonky and crying about depression etc just because they took a little bit of inulin that I really have no idea what is wrong with some of you people. \n\nI realize that sounds insulting and I do not mean it to sound so, but I mean you took it before so obviously you do not have something like irritable bowel syndrome or something that would make sense to troubleshoot. \n\nSomething like a headache is a pretty serious side effect, but honestly it sounds like you just have the flu to me. Or else you are just part of that 1% of people that has some major weird problem and you should stop taking it. \n\nI mean I heard of a story of a school teacher that was sent to the hospital and near death the other day because her students threw a banana at her and she is majorly allergic to bananas. Like a banana touches her skin so she dies. Who am I to judge? That's just what happens. \n\nAll the bacteria die-off stuff is generally just hippy wierdo pseudoscience. Generally I think the microbiome completely changes back after 24 hours, maybe inulin can change it for a little longer depending on what you've eaten etc etc. But granted 5g of inulin is not that much, I take like 25g every 2 days (when I don't fall out of the habit, which I do for 3-4 days)... but yeah after 24-36 hours your gut biome just went back to normal and you still feel like this, which basically indicates that it's not inulin... maybe you are sleeping on a metal spoon or something.", "711" ], [ "The scientific literature does not necessarily all have to agree with each other, and science basically becomes religious dogma when people try to make it all agree with each other.\n\nSome of the literature I've read does mention the gel formation bit, but seemed to indicate that psyllium husk was not prebiotic in and of itself, rather it would just help ferment prebiotics.\n\nAlso, it is saying it has prebiotic potential. Rather than saying something like, psyllium has been demonstrated to be prebiotic.\n\nIt does matter if it's prebiotic or not, because then people with irritable bowel syndome can't take that fiber. I don't even know if they could take it now, but if someone with IBD came in, it's the only thing I could possibly think to suggest to them, under the understanding that its one of the few fibers that is not prebiotic. It would be ideal if people with IBD had enough wiggle room that they could tinker with the fibers over the very long term and perhaps miraculously reverse their condition through diet, rather than it just being some lifetime genetic jail sentence. \n\nOK and for the sake of argument, let's say it is a prebiotic. It's definitely not like inulin where it makes you super gassy etc. So even if it is prebiotic, it might definitely be much less prebiotic, and therefore much more useful in certain scenarios (not that it is not universally useful).\n\nThe only thing I can otherwise think to say is that, there are some things marketed out there as fiber, and some papers basically say that it's (Isomaltooligosaccharides) just sugar so don't bother. \n\nBasically I don't let any paper give me any sort of ultimate impression on these things, but its more like I have a 1-10 scale for each fiber and how it acts, a paper might change my assessment of any prebiotic, so in this case, psyllium prebiotic just went from 0 prebiotic (or gas producing) to 1 or 2 on a scale of 1-10.", "642" ], [ "I like <PERSON> but I doubt he was indicating to mess around with drugs. Drugs didn't really even exist where they are at today, I think his advice is timeless and applicable to all ages.\n\nDepakote is hardly some sort of \"brain hack\", it's an anti-psychotic medication that people stop taking because they can't think clearly. Still, if it operates in some very strange way and has some strange benefit, its nice to know that some of these fibers might give us that strange perk to some extent. There is a chance that it might not be the HDAC inhibition that is doing it, though. Such a medication operates on some very strange levers.\n\nI've taken Semax like substance before, it's the sort of thing that is useful once a year when you are moving all your furniture around. Whatever it does to the brain, it makes you an expert at calculating dimensions of objects etc on the fly. I mean they have been shown to increase math ability temporarily. But they also interfere with sleep. Based on my experience I think like once a year is the right number, I doubt you could trick your brain with it once a month.\n\nYou generally want to keep your brain chemistry very predictable anyways so you can be a good judge of what is authentic laziness, anger, etc, which can only be dealt with with actual willpower, patience, diligence etc, all that non chemical work that can be done, to which <PERSON> was really referring to for the most part.", "664" ], [ "Prebiotics are digested mostly in the last third of the large intestine, which is of course what comes right before the rectum and anus. But honestly there are other factors at work, maybe PH related or the body has some way of detected and reacting to fiber, because you can start having the urge to use the washroom like an hour after taking your fiber.\n\nSo that's all I can tell you really, watch out for the double whammy effect, you'll get an effect shortly after taking it, and then again the next day. And taking probiotics with prebiotics is definitely overwhelming, maybe take them on separate days or maybe like 6-12 hours after taking your prebiotics. But even the latter doesn't make sense, because this stuff can give you a lot of energy right after you take it and you have to ask yourself if you are gonna be able to sleep. So there is really no other easy answer other than to experiment and see what is actually working for you.\n\nI always took my MCT oil in my morning coffee when I was on keto. I'd say wait a half hour then take your prebiotics. You want to take the prebiotics in the morning or halfway through your day because they give you a ton of energy.\n\nSometimes prebiotics can make you crap everything that is in you out, which can make you get a really good sleep, but that's kind of playing the lottery, because other times you will just be able to run a marathon with all the energy you have, especially if you are taking other stuff like MCT oil and all that. So basically the answer is everything, in the morning, in whatever order which is most effective.... generally fiber comes in last... but you might want to mix the probiotics in with the prebiotics as that improves probiotic survivability through the stomach acid, there is that element to it as well...", "346" ], [ "Yeah that sounds good, watch out for the high PH levels in that, I crapped my guts out so loud at one of the last jobs I had, it was extremely embarrassing and the janitor guy could hear me and asked if I was alright, lol. It was like something out of a comedy movie it was so bad. Its the spirulina which has a super high PH in those super foods, it can cause seemingly dangerous stomach cramps etc if you are going nuts with it. \n\nI mean you can eventually ramp up the fiber levels pretty high through a taper, but due to the high PH of that green superfood stuff, you can never ramp up the amounts of that stuff, your body just has no way of dealing with the PH other than huge cramps and immediate bowel evacuation.", "346" ], [ "Yep its some legendary gas, but usually corresponds with a trip to the toilet, and you are kind of asking yourself \"what is normal\" because if the fiber is moving the crap along so quickly, are you really supposed to go around with crap in you all day and no gas?\n\nThen if its reducing anxiety, is that because you were going around nervous all day, constipated, and didn't even know it?\n\nMany questions... not a whole lot of answers...\n\nAll I know is that I don't want to be that weird little person who goes around all bent out of shape because of a lack of fiber... and ramping up to 25 grams really does make the difference (although its notably expensive considering how fast you blow through these bottles, and they run you 10-20 bucks a pop with the brand name stuff being better tasting and more expensive).\n\nBimunos nice but a whole sachet is a bit overwhelming for me, I tend to take half a sachet. I kind of also prefer inulin as the daily driver with bimuno being there once a week or so for variety. But it definitely has its place in the mix.", "346" ], [ "I answered it. 24 hours and all the prebiotics have cleared the system and the microbiome is back to normal.\n\nI'm not saying that nothing can happen, you could induce dysbiosis or something and have some flare up in your intestines kind of like temporary irritable bowel syndrome or something like that. But that would be gone in like 2-3 days unless you had officially diagnosed IBD. And that would not explain the headache, and honestly wouldn't explain the other two effects either. It would just be like an intestinal discomfort and maybe some toilet issues for a couple of days.\n\nHow could inulin cause a stomach ache? Prebiotics and probiotics are thought of as helpful against H. pylori which causes stomach ulcers.\n\nI'm tryin to be like a doctor here, a doctor is looking for the actual mechanics of the illness. Most headaches are due to neck tension and poor posture, or due to the way you were sleeping.", "346" ], [ "Pretty sure they have a good bit of non temperature related potato starch:\n\n_URL_0_\n\nThey generally have (the potential for) both. I have had the satiety index food charge up on my fridge for ages. But I mean a potato is a pretty simple food with not a whole lot of constituents, there are not a whole lot of explanations of why it would be filling other than the potato starch.\n\nI mean we can talk about optimum levels etc but the best way to test if this is actually working or not, is if someone who has no idea what they are doing, goes ahead and flukes into miraculous results. And I think that's what he's done here, he's gone and proven the case for normal, non temperature related potato starch.", "559" ], [ "> I’m not blaming the inulin, I’m not saying the inulin caused anything.\n > \n > What I’m asking is if stopping inulin is causing my biome damage because I’m no longer feeding it inulin and if that could be causing me to feel ill. \n\nDo these two statements not contradict each other?\n\nThe biome is not really delicate, it is also generally not all that genetically related, and it generally mostly has to do with what you eat. That is why it completely changes every 24 hours, and that's why its important to eat vegetables every day, since the microbiome changes every 24 hours it doesn't really matter so much what you did yesterday. \n\nAnyways other people will come along and give their take on it. I would also recommend seeing a real doctor. We are only really good at making people sick, we're not much good at making people better... tons of recommendations I have given in this forum, I abandoned myself because I was crapping out concrete and tearing my arse apart... but I didn't go back and remove those recommendations... this is very much trial and error wild west type of stuff", "135" ], [ "Android is not exactly a valid option anymore given the gross expansion of tech censorship. We need to start seeing Librem type phones, running Linux, with a physical keyboard. \n\nWith android, you have no security anyways, and since you can't root it, you can't really protect yourself from all the spying and censorship.\n\nLibrem offers potentially much better security compared to what we have now, and full control over the device. Now it just needs a physical keyboard and it'll be objectively better than Blackberry and every other phone for that matter.", "781" ], [ "It's a spybrick. Cellphone sales are down big time. People are getting sick of being spied on and harassed by the government and companies. You are delusional. Options are coming like the Librem 5. Or people can just go buy a Huawei device so it's the Chinese spying on them and not their own government.\n\nThe Americans can throw a pissy fit and try to ban every device that doesn't spy on you. But you are arguing that it's here to stay because the demand is high. No, it's here to stay because the government is forcing it down your throat. And you know that, too. Had Huawei been allowed a open free market like capitalists are supposed to be big fans of, they could introduce their own OS and destroy Android. I doubt they will be allowed to, but the numbers are there indicating that they were obtaining market dominance with their physical devices. Maybe they will continue to sell well with their own operating system, if they are allowed to sell them, and that will be the end of android.", "781" ], [ "as a side note, fill out the use of a representative form or else you and/or your spouse will not be able to talk on behalf of each other when interacting with CIC. you will need to use the webform to update them depending on how things go. My wife is not very tech savvy and its a pain forcing her to use the webform by herself seeing as we are far away. Yet they will not speak to anyone but her. Due to us not filling that form", "546" ], [ "They want everyone to go back to being TV drones, and people will go back to being stupid. It worked on the boomers. Take my advice and get out of dodge. Youtube is boring and I had no problem deleting my account the other day. I'd like to delete my actual gmail account too once I'm confident that I've moved all my important services off the address linked to it.\n\nDeleting your Google stuff feels good in the same way paying off a credit card does. Less mental burden to carry around with you, less spying etc. They only focus on big channels so yeah, no loss, its just like turning off the TV and they won't be able to read your private emails or look at your dick pics that you have on your google drive.", "99" ], [ "You are saying this after <PERSON>, you realize that, right? We have plenty of insight into what the government does. They could have sent blackberry a letter saying that there are only 2 games in town, two cucked companies that will cave to all security requests.\n\nThe entire world market can handle more than two platforms lol. I mean you have macs, PC and linux right, and that's just desktops. Huawei will come out with something, they won't respect copyright and they'll make a killing. People will be ordering it and trying to hide it from the post man, when they get their device it will be fricken sweet. No one will want to be stuck with a shitty Samsung or Apple device. Slow, walled garden, spies on you, expensive, inferior in every way. Capitalism wins kid. Learn it", "370" ], [ "I've had seagate external drives fail on me when I was using them as external drives. The best luck I've ever had was with WD internal drives, never had one fail on me. I also had cheap Chinese SSD fail on me and Samsung evo did not. You could have bad experiences with either company really, I think the evidence stacks slightly against Seagate, but I assume they try hard enough not to be considered the shit brand that no one wants. Still, they kind of are in a way, I think you'll see the public opinion here indicates that to a minor extent. But that also doesn't mean that every WD drive will not fail you, you could continue to have bad experiences. Cuz math n shieet", "448" ], [ "ah my headphones are AT-M40xs or something, good to hear that they are good... also yeah I had a good experience with antec that makes server cases, I had to send them a couple emails to nudge them and wake them up, someone finally got off their ass to send me some old ass plastic harddrive clips for cheap, like 10 dollars for a big handful of them.\n\nI guess people are people and they can be good occasionally", "329" ], [ "Well its just my opinion that you should learn this in a coherent, structured way. If that is a free 4 hour Youtube video, or 1 guy making 12 twenty minute videos, etc, it doesn't really matter. But it shouldn't be bits and pieces from different people for this particular topic. You are trying to learn how to structure your code here so that it's easier to work with. The way you learn that also should be structured.\n\nYes for inheritance you need all your classes to have at least one value in common that they can inherit from that class. This can be the one value of the counter.\n\nIts like you have mammals, then you have the equine class, then under that you have horses, donkeys, mules, etc. \n\nAll horses, donkeys, mules have tails, the same basic shape, etc. That shape cannot be inherited from the mammals class. But it can be inherited from the equine class.\n\nSo put the counter in the equine class. That is a variable that is common to all your horses, donkeys, and mules.\n\nThen you increase it for the equine class and it automatically increases across the board for all horses, all donkeys and all mules.\n\nDoes this help?\n\nI barely know this stuff, this was literally the point I got to before going back to do more exercises etc.", "53" ], [ "You have mammals, equines and horses, donkeys and mules.\n\nYou want to increase the counter by 2 for all creatures of the equine class.\n\nBut you want to increase donkeys by a factor of 2.0x, horses by 1.0x, mules by 0.5x.\n\nSo those are modifiers that you can put into each of those classes one time. \n\nYou are still increasing across the board by 2 for all of the equine class. They are inheriting that 2 from the equine class. But they modify it based on the modifiers you coded into each of the horse, donkey and mule class.", "991" ], [ "Huawei also was offering incremental upgrades but more substantial than Samsung or Apple, and at much less price. They were on fire with huge increase in sales. Samsung and Apple were commanding a premium that cannot exist without government intervention. \n\nIf they come out with their own operating system and they hire excellent coders in C, C++ etc to make lightning fast programs to operate camera, etc, it could gain a lot of attention.\n\nThe android environment has gotten fat with complacency, tons of apps are coded poorly.\n\nHuawei has the government of China behind them. China has tons and tons of people coming out of university with advance STEM technical skills like coding low level programming languages.\n\nHuawei will also have the same operating system running in the phone, car, desktop computer etc. All one operating system. Probably tied in with some sort of cryptocurrency as well.\n\nWhat will android have? Honest question. Its very boring. Heaven forbid you need to take a picture with your blackberry camera, takes like 30 seconds to open, just a black screen.\n\nYes people will start to care about privacy once the war with Iran starts up and they censor anti-war opinions. People are not slabs of meat to be bought and sold and your cavilier attitude towards all this is disheartening. BB10 was the right device at the wrong time. When your youtube account is suspended for using the N word, you are gonna want off android. Your whole phone might be banned off youtube for that, permanently. Who knows. Its gonna suck for people who who also like to be caviler, people love to leave rude comments when they are taking a shit and if you take that away, watch what happens...", "781" ], [ "> So basically I can use the simple rule of thumb of;\n\nUnfortunately things are not that simple because there are so many different bacterial types, and certain things can feed certain bacteria and those bacteria could be producing something bad, or there could be an over abundance of good bacteria which leads to negative effects, etc.\n\nGenerally the term as it was understood in the 80's was that Prebiotics means food that only the good bacteria can eat and the bad bacteria cannot eat, therefore you give the good bacteria a competitive advantage in a zero sum environment, which leads to more good bacteria and thereby you benefit from it.\n\nBut I mean <PERSON> who posts in these forums has offered some papers which seem to indicate that good prebiotic bacteria can have some negative effects.\n\nThen again he has IBD or something and those people should avoid prebiotics because it really upsets their gut.\n\nI personally tend to go with the high level, 80s perspective, that I just take a bunch of fiber and its good, but just keep on the lookout and be aware that there is that ultra low level autistic way of looking at these things, that you could be feeding Actinobacteria or something at some % that is higher than desired, leading to some sort of dysbiosis and resulting inflammation... etc etc you get the point.\n\nYou can't understand this whole thing at such a whole level, because so little is known about it, plus genetics are a big part. But in general its like trying to read machine code for a computer. No one person can learn enough to be able to understand it all, so you need to look at things from a high level and ignore the fine details.\n\n > So basically I can use the simple rule of thumb of;\n > \n > higher resistant starch content - > higher butyrate ?\n\nshort answer yes, long answer no\n\n > Interesting that you mention constipation, as that is something I have had the last 5 years or so, progressing to being almost completely the last 2. It wasn't until recently I started realising that fiber helped with that (psyllium*), and that my sleep became much deeper.\n\nYeah the fiber = sleep thing is something someone pointed out here and it stuck with me, never heard of it outside of this forum. It plus magnesium have been the only thing to really help me sleep. Everything else sucked and gave me months of insomnia.\n\n > Inulin gives me -massive- energy, in terms of cognitive flexibility, improved memory and cognition. Task-switching is really easy on it and I notice the effects almost instantly after I take it. A slightly higher degree of emotionality exists too when I take it.\n\nYeah I can go maybe 2 days without it before things start heading south fast, especially these days now that I've become more reliant on my fiber-self. My guts become upset without it and are basically talking to me telling me to take it. If I don't I return to even worse constipation, mental incompetence etc. at least for the short term.\n\n > Interestingly potato starch (and other starches that produces butyrate*) improves dopamine synthesis via upregulation of tyrosine hydroxylase through butyrate as an epigenetic mechanism.\n\nVery interesting, I have not messed with the resistant starches lately out of laziness, has just been easier to get to the grocery store as opposed to the bulk food store, but maybe I'll dip back into it. The problem is that they are a little more complex. You can't just put green banana flour in with your other flours, its a super fine dust that is super dangerous to inhale when you pour it into another container. And as for drinking it back after mixing with water, its too fine and course to drink back comfortably. You'll gag on it.\n\nSo you need to mix it with xantham gum, which is a water desurficant, which breaks up the surface area of the water or something, turns it into kind of like a gelly with even a very small amount. Then its easy to drink back.\n\nBut all of that is a huge pain compared to just mixing up inulin and psyllium husk, which easily mixes with water. The cups are easily cleaned. Etc.", "346" ], [ "Yeah but the thing was that you could spend 500-600 on a Huawei phone and it would be nicer than a 1000 dollar Apple phone. People drop their phones in the toilet and stuff like that, so when there were sales to be made, they were going to Huawei. Now that Huawei is gonna come out with their own operating system, they are gonna make the software just as slick as their hardware and people are gonna be curious and want to switch over. The government will literally have to ban the consumer from buying the product they want. Then people are gonna argue that Android is somehow better. Thats a joke...", "781" ], [ "in North America I was dealing with a company, they had not made a clear distinction between Canadian or American dollars on their site (problem has been since rectified since I complained about it), I was bitching that I was charged way more than I expected to be and was considering taking my business elsewhere, they basically said that they make too much money to care about it.\n\nI appreciated their brutal honesty but I would prefer that someone care about my money and call me honey. No money no honey.", "618" ], [ "That's dissapointing. How about Amazon affiliates? When I used to read marketing sites, they said that the reason Amazon gave decent commisions was because they were afraid of all the affiliates teaming together and forming serious competition. I have seen that they have chipped away at the program over the years. They used to offer 25$ for anyone who sold a computer, which was really generous and was incentive enough to get me working for them, and I did enjoy the commission from computer and xbox sales, but they have since done away with that.", "598" ], [ "Well this article is about methionine. From Wikipedia:\n\n > It is made from adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and methionine by methionine adenosyltransferase\n\n_URL_1_\n\nIt's taught in highschool biology that ATP is considered the energy molecule. So to supplement SAM-e maybe you conserve energy (ATP), and SAM-e itself is a potent energy molecule.\n\n > The principal methyl-donor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) is synthesized from methionine and ATP, and participates in more cellular reactions than any other molecule except for ATP. \n\nSAM-e is a very potent antioxidant and \"well regarded\" as far as epigenetics go.\n\n > SAM is critical for the maintenance and transmission of epigenetic information. \n\n_URL_0_\n\nBut no one really knows what you are doing to your body when you supplement SAM-e in huge amounts like me as far as I am aware. \n\n > Furthermore, models have been developed that will allow me to address fundamental questions about epigenetic stability and the effect of dietary limitations on epigenetics. To assess epigenetic stability I will use yeast reporter strains modified to evade the SAM-checkpoint and monitor histone methylation of yeast cells in SAM limiting conditions. \n\nSo you kind of see here in this guys thesis statement, how it is working. SAM-e interacts with many different cells, methylation occurs a lot of times per second. According to this nerd it happens\n\n > methylation happens more than a billion times per second in our body\n\n_URL_2_\n\nHDAC inhibition is generally regarded as good when not taken to absurd extremes. Taking a ton of SAM-e is a miracle for my mood but who knows as far as what effects it could have. If something occurs a billion times per second and I am supplementing a ton more SAM-e in my body then it naturally produces, I guess I am creating a lot of variables right.", "833" ], [ "My keyone is pretty awesome but I grow very paranoid of all these different companies. I kind of want to just delete all my accounts and put all of my information on my own linux server, that way you know that you are in control of it and no hacker is poking around your data. I don't trust windows, Google, facebook, any longer and I seek to consolidate. Plus my phone is spying on me too. I do want a new phone, but its the Librem 5, so I know that I can get these snoops off my back once and for all. I'm just at a crisis where I love the physical keyboard so much, I love my chains here so to speak. This newer phone is worse in many ways but offers data privacy, the first phone to do so. So thats the only new thing that I could possibly want in a phone. It would be nice to have autonomy and hear on the news about all the data snooping, and know 100% that you are no longer liable to be exposed to that. You don't want to owe anyone anything or have any snoops on your back, its bad like credit card debt, and it must be a relief to put an end to it.", "697" ], [ "lol if you think voting does anything. Our country is entirely controlled by a certain group of people. <PERSON> and <PERSON> are simply the good cop bad cop routine that stupid people fall for. Its literally the same cycle of us going over in the middle east over and over again.\n\nThe difference here is that <PERSON> specifically said he was not gonna start a bunch of wars in the middle east, now if he starts in with Iran, that's a little thing called \"lying\". Meanwhile <PERSON> was quite open about her Iran ambitions.\n\nSo you know what that makes you? That makes you a warmonger.\n\nAnd given what happened with the democrats criticizing <PERSON>, being a warmonger makes you what is called, a hypocrite.", "856" ], [ "If our great grandparents could see what society turned into today, they would have turned around on the beaches of Normandy and went home. \n\n > I am not a <PERSON> supporter\n\nThey literally openly circumvented the democratic process by using super delegates to make sure <PERSON> didn't get the nomination. Even the \"super hateful\" daily stormer blog is pro-Bernie because he is anti-war. And they say that <PERSON> is just waiting for someone other than <PERSON> to win the democratic primaries because if he starts up with the war stuff now, <PERSON> would probably win. \n\nWatch now, they will start up after <PERSON> loses. Because it's not a real democracy when it is being gamed like that. This isn't our country, we are just a gun to be used in the middle east and its upsetting that you put false hope into it.", "468" ], [ "i use the search function a lot. I was trying to find a sad song by <PERSON> i think. For some reason I think it is called \"die another day\" or \"another day\" or something like that. All I can find is a <PERSON> remix of the 007 movie song, which is definitely not what I am looking for.\n\nAs an aside, few of the songs people were mentioning in that thread seemed sad. They just seemed dark, which trance is by nature.\n\nThis song I am thinking of is actually sad, the lyrics are something about a love one who has departed. I just thought of it this morning for some random reason and it will pester me all day unless I can figure out what it is I'm thinking of and listen to it.\n\nedit: found it: <PERSON> feat. <PERSON> - Yet Another Day", "213" ], [ "is buy and sell nano on binance, and buy and sell bitcoin on coinbase, still a valid option for a canadian? quadriga turned out to be a scam lol, those are the two other exchanges I used, bitgrail and quadriga. I dont want to get stuck with my dick in my ear during the ath. is there sell limits with coinbase? I know they have buy limits", "509" ], [ "That is quite the question. To be clear I recommend black seed oil for epigenetic reasons (there are only few substances really shown to have these properties, butyrate being one of those few substances). I am actually unsure if black seed oil itself is prebiotic, but I guess anything you consume has an effect on your gut microbiome and I'm guessing black seed oil is favorable, possibly even prebiotic.\n\nAs for actual comparisons, all I can find quickly is a study on broiler chickens. In this stuff, black seed faired just a little bit better than synbiotics, but both faired well:\n\n_URL_0_", "346" ], [ "Hooh boy, I will have to check that out. I used their backup services before I'm not sure if they were anywhere as nice when I was messin around with it. I gotta take a good look to see what I am dealing with here so I reserve the right to remain startled or even aghast.\n\nHonestly I am at a privacy crossroads here. I, like I said, want to use the Librem 5, but it has no physical keyboard and the virtual keyboard has aids, seems like they use an e-pen with it. Even typing here on reddit gives tons of information away that X Keyscore Evil Deepstate shit can utilize to detect my style of writing etc. \n\nWith what they already have, there is already not a whole lot most people can do. You can and should start becoming privacy focused starting today, but the options are pretty bad. \n\nAt some point the option is just to stop using it. I have a plan to delete facebook etc etc in the not too distant future. I've switched to protonmail which I pay for, some of my information is secured at least. But its a huge commitment and everyone is poor, the rich 1% \"illuminati\" took all the profits from this economic boom and most people haven't seen all this money to go out and dump it all into security etc... so the answer is to simply stop using the shit if they don't respect us... that's my takeaway", "966" ], [ "> I see your perspective! Proton mail is a really good service, but here is the problem; the email you send and receive is almost never encrypted, so even though Proton doesn’t read your email, you’re still wide open. The biggest problem with email is there is no good PGP solution that works for mortal men. _URL_0_ let’s your encrypt any outgoing mail - great. But to decrypt it, the recipient has to be using _URL_0_. That’s... pretty much useless. If Blackberry (or Microsoft) could develop a platform agnostic encryption solution that works for everyone, email would finally be ‘fixed’, but as it stands, it’s the most insecure form of communication by far.\n\nI don't really deal with people anyways, it is incomprehensible to me that people actually use their e-mail to talk with people. I was mostly uncomfortable with all my financial alerts etc from my bank coming into Gmail, thus giving Google a complete insight into my personal finances.\n\nI want all the alerts I can get on my finances obviously.\n\nAlso I am learning coding C# and I am considering interacting with the platform programmatically, learning how to send myself my own personal alerts securely would be a useful exercise. I can alert myself to local weather conditions for example, using entirely my own code and libraries I found online.\n\nSo from computer program, to my e-mail, the computer could use another protonmail account (I pay for it, so I have 5) so at that point, its a secure protonmail to protonmail message, right? What other layers of security are pertinent to makin that work?\n\n > I work for a fortune 100 company that does business almost entirely by email, which makes it impossible to secure valuable trade secrets. I really hope someone steps up to the plate. Microsoft has the most to gain, but if Blackberry did it, I believe they would be relevant again and it would be a huge buy signal.\n\nYeah things are getting to the point where it actually matters. I was thinkin last night, what if you were a small business owner. They could automatically fish information into your activities and sell it to the competition, as in advising them what sort of ad campaign would be fortunate for them to run against you. And they couldnt' really try to blackmail you with the info, so that stuff would kind of just happen. Especially with social media starting to die out a little bit and people getting paranoid, they will be even more eager to utilize the information they do have, more aggressively.\n\n > The problem? They would need to sponsor datacenter resources at a cloud provider like Azure or AWS, and they won’t be able to afford it.\n\nI doubt that all this security fiasco is a result of finances, rather I am sure that the 5 eyes or whatever has passed down a direct order that all security apparatuses must be shitty, so that they can see everything that is going on. If there is any success to be had, it will be made through the blockchain or something (the internet operating as a country) (but probably nothing will happen).", "966" ], [ "For those of us who were in a couple grand, it was a much better education than many university courses were and likely cheaper.\n\nI expected that there would be a little summer rush to shake things up (as opposed to the traditional Christmas rush), but I also expected that we're in a 3 year cycle. People are simply too depleted from that last rush to be able to finance what we saw before. Your average person is just now digging themselves out of the financial pit that they got into.\n\nIt will take that 3 year cycle for them to have the kind of money to be foolish with again in order to finance what we saw before. Foolish or smart. The REAL smart boys are the ones who accumulate, cuz there is no way that bitcoin is not going back up again. Mr <PERSON> coming out and banning crypto might work for a while, but could also serve as an embarassing demonstration of powerlessness since the boomer generation has never done our generation any favors, and we could in theory find a way around the cock blockage to get at our one financial opportunity.", "1008" ], [ "don't bother. there are 700 bots on each server, they even have it set to send messages to you and act like a real person. there is literally a bot that goes around and tries to recruit vassals, and it will actually form a fairly complex relationship with you, even as far as small talk goes and all that jazz. it will run you through newbie/mid quests and make comments on your progress.\n\nthe programmers of AC really carved out the heart and soul of the game. If you want a pure experience you have to become a programmer yourself and learn how to start up a server so you can play by yourself. or log into hightide. only 2 ways to play alone. my 2p. cheers\n\n- <PERSON>, the 3rd", "109" ], [ "BSO is very potent, just order a bottle and take it. Some days I take off because it can cause some pretty nasty acid reflux. That being said, they recommend that one takes it twice per day and I take what they recommend all at once.\n\nAlso brah you are mixing out on the prebiotics, again just buy it and take it, its like 5 bucks for the fiber. It makes me a different person. I have enormous learning difficulties when I'm off my fiber, the difference is night and day.\n\nI would not recommend those medications, they can be extremely powerful. I've read blogs where more eccentric people talk about taking them. I would not want to injure my liver or some crap, that would be a nightmare. If you are foolhardy to try it out though let me know if it turns out to be like a Limitless pill or something, that would be very intruiging to me.", "711" ], [ "Well I was doing Google/Google scholar searches too, I started this forum with a focus on black seed oil, sulforphane, butyrate (produced by prebiotics) etc. I reverse engineered and came to find what substances produce the results that I was seeking. \n\n_URL_0_\n\nStart off with maybe 1 teaspoon of inulin and scale it up very slowly. I'd take some sugar free metamucil (or psyllium husk fiber) along with it, maybe 2 parts inulin to 1 part psyllium. I'm now up to 8+ teaspoons of inulin every couple days but that's way too much for a beginner to handle. \n\nOnce you accustomed to it, scale it up. If you take it with a probiotic, be careful because you can get gassy. But it makes a world of difference, you will sleep like a champion. Don't forget that slow wave sleep is the most productive time in your day and will improve productivity during your waking day by 20%.", "41" ], [ "Is this possible to set up with not any knowledge of ESP8266? Like what do I need for this? Do I need to install a speaker on the thing or whatever?\n\nI like to come into these things, quickly set up something useful and practical and then stop learning about them after I made something useful. For example I made a digital security camera with my raspberry pi that turned out really nice (even shuts down by script when it goes above a certain temperature etc etc). I think it might be cool to have this thing read out text or something to spook my dog once in a while. But if I'm not gonna be able to figure it out then it would be nice to know. Also what do I need to buy, just esp, cord, what else? \n\nThanks", "551" ], [ "If ritalin didn't help you then you are kind of in a bad spot, lol. I wrote a lot of this stuff when I was high off my ass on ritalin in university. You can even get distracted on that stuff and its not particularly enjoyable, its kind of a miserable existence being on those meds. But you can learn. I'm not sure if it is worth it because it has such an emotional blunting effect, it takes years to recover, if you will ever be the same after it at all.\n\nI have a program called cold turkey pro that I start up when I am feeling way to distracted. It just automatically shuts of all distracting sites, games, etc for hours. I find that after a few hours I will have often gotten back into my work and started to enjoy my work. More than say 2 hours is brutal and a little too punishing however. That program cost like 20 dollars or something but its been very useful and worthwhile.\n\nWatch this guys entire video, its priceless for a university student: _URL_0_\n\nThis book is also useful: _URL_2_\n\nMy miracle pill was SAM-e. I take 2400 mg a day, its a huge difference when I'm not on it. Kind of sucks to have to be on something though especially since its so damn expensive. But I just can't get ramped up and motivated without it.\n\nSocial anxiety will ramp down over time as you age, your central nervous system slows down and you normalize. I had massive social anxiety as a teen and young man, it was nuts, but once you get into the later 20s, it stops being much of a thing. I'm still not very social but I am married etc. My wife can introduce me to people and facilitate a normal life. Part of social anxiety is just being a man, kind of like a wild dog, you are just anxious around strangers and protective over your own territory, I don't know what to tell <PERSON>\n\nAs for the supplements, I tried a ton of stuff and wasted a lot of money, but I truly believe that for a lot of people, if they keep testing out different stuff they will find something that works. If they don't give each thing an honest and wholehearted try then they won't be able to figure it out.\n\nHere is the mini book I wrote, its literally a shotgun blast of all the useful advice I could think to throw at a person, if that doesn't work then you're S. O. L., lol\n\n_URL_1_", "398" ] ]
256
[ 25020, 7787, 493, 15215, 11626, 22438, 7844, 13864, 2336, 24046, 25021, 18686, 24990, 12414, 14855, 18533, 24474, 9958, 12451, 20713, 15509, 31, 3806, 19582, 4252, 4971, 21667, 5712, 8483, 6438, 10263, 2145, 6191, 5035, 7047, 4839, 16804, 5678, 2131, 4194, 11289, 15635, 7947, 9308, 25170, 21562, 1851, 985, 923, 1650, 22949, 630, 11243, 12160, 25164, 10537, 23310, 17656, 21100, 4836, 6894, 1892, 22258, 9078, 6831, 18047, 4262, 3522, 2392, 415, 21036, 9677, 23351, 19156, 3939, 1800, 16399, 5264, 17465, 23417, 24889, 3917, 22456, 9041, 19013, 21778, 18491, 20039, 16996, 10051, 24534, 14356, 19730, 479, 4041, 5040, 21969, 5705, 18197, 10079, 4313, 922, 24950, 2442, 16104, 727, 9487, 21425, 16871, 8973, 13835, 13797, 2270, 1551, 17466, 23715, 3050, 11758, 11928, 1593, 10838, 12705, 12140, 10723, 14667, 9804, 18395, 21214, 23568, 77, 22360, 7713, 21065, 25088, 13303, 12143, 15903, 18409, 17759, 7617, 20712, 11851, 11853, 10011, 4948, 24511, 15951, 19074, 24184, 4849, 25057, 17609, 24868, 14887, 24633, 4303, 3410, 23490, 10872, 5831, 7515, 15561, 24600, 12846, 3241, 16561, 7036, 17481, 2753, 22022, 3831, 19441, 9558, 20406, 20111, 8922, 22244, 21885, 2352, 13374, 25037, 1425, 5425, 5122, 5446, 8695, 13084, 17496, 23902, 10303, 13822, 15634, 10267, 15707, 5789, 14193, 13996, 25156, 16152, 12157, 11046, 24807, 15774, 834, 14972, 1464, 23440, 23685, 1633, 24275, 7978, 3051, 17016, 5917, 11664, 21612, 6693, 15186, 9328, 22148, 8108, 11317, 21370, 1062, 15963, 9885, 3027, 20067, 9873, 21932, 12002, 15296, 742, 18248, 7452, 19345, 5776, 17906, 10368, 22176, 4321, 10025, 762, 4996, 8114, 23928, 1927, 25154, 21220, 10715, 7273, 19256, 2447, 1113, 19086, 8135, 11773, 15928, 13016, 19359, 14510, 15083, 13510, 13509, 21961, 13436, 18263, 13709, 22024, 13014, 6041, 16626, 11157, 24276, 19746, 697, 1704, 20332, 20012, 313, 24503, 4565, 11066, 6681, 11427, 22373, 16101, 1401, 13000, 1310, 22134, 4787, 25508, 14393, 16484, 10333, 7684, 16682, 9501, 5901, 14707, 453, 22156, 10785, 6005, 15104, 3131, 20193, 22819, 8216, 1728, 820, 21137, 13613, 21556, 23054, 5697, 13581, 5580, 21151, 17397, 6394, 10669, 19050, 23580, 22879, 1149, 21782, 20129, 15757, 20590, 22896, 4732, 17593, 6662, 15211, 6351, 25341, 8757, 4042, 15766, 12216, 9617, 10118, 8231, 13095, 19055, 24185, 5888, 9692, 19968, 14177, 5285, 2708, 17755, 1275, 17668, 20323, 13987, 16565, 4507, 25071, 21549, 11378, 24796, 9028, 10185, 4273, 23242, 21066, 21811, 15890, 3222, 9134, 16558, 15579, 10593, 22, 17474, 7050, 19023, 8537, 10873, 3815, 6373, 21054, 17625, 12062, 7022, 20226, 18160, 4949, 24980, 14957, 2048, 8158, 10786, 17253, 24572, 15976, 16497, 6239, 11186, 2191, 18012, 12122, 17049, 1522, 4552, 11619, 10501, 3844, 18567, 2837, 8017, 8758, 9620, 19792, 40, 10727, 16781, 21023, 19834, 13348, 22535, 8740, 7280, 12617, 19376, 23151, 9227, 11455, 4269, 13246, 16462, 10445, 23199, 88, 15826, 14555, 2695, 21889, 4712, 489, 16102, 12090, 23293, 7248, 3821, 22740, 2932, 25158, 17234, 10576, 11084, 18535, 24, 14200, 13400, 3247, 15221, 23856, 3026, 14660, 7111, 18042, 5190, 11443, 4735, 1024, 4638, 9245, 24832, 15429, 20329, 2597, 9470, 12289, 10026, 5072, 438, 8791, 18651, 10230, 11983, 8502, 10232, 21266, 5221, 9313, 11216, 16, 23799, 16233, 4136, 23773, 15601, 11063, 2224 ]
reddit_dump_0_Gravitas
[ [ "No.. If all _____ s are beautiful, that means that all ____ s are beautiful, not that \"everything is beautiful.\" And it doesn't lose significance as a word, because it's perfectly valid to think that all things within a certain category are beautiful, since you're comparing to the set of all things rather than just what's in that category.\n\nAlso, it's not necessarily subjective to think that all things in a certain category are beautiful, as standards of beauty are based on human psychology which is physiologically based and potentially has significant common features between people.\n\nAlso, perfection can be defined as \"fulfills all criteria\" rather than being based on a relative comparison. For instance, if I'm looking for a perfect paper weight, there's an entire category of otherwise dissimilar objects within the suitable range of chemical and physical properties that will function equally and maximally well as a paper weight.\n\nPerhaps your brain is cramped in there?", "378" ], [ "If you're referring to things like \"Play Store\" those are not part of the operating system. The operating system itself has a GPL license. Phones are usually packaged with proprietary google software and won't work very well as a phone without that software (or a replacement for that software).\n\nSome people run entirely open source android phones. No Play store. No Google Maps. No google Now launcher. Etc.", "781" ], [ "Google's practices aren't particularly anti consumer with respect to Android phones. The rest of the companies you mentioned are heavily anti-consumer.\n\nThe fact is that google could be anti-consumer in the same ways but has opted to maintain an open source operating system kernel (with enough modularity that you can replace the proprietary parts completely) and sells their own phones unlocked, unlike almost everyone else.\n\nNot saying they're perfect, but since you pretty much have to have a phone in first world society, you should support the company whose practices are the least unethical.", "781" ], [ "There's no reason to think it's impossible to accomplish. The safeguard against those things is being an educated and functional democracy prior to and during the transition to communism. \n\nNone of the historically communist countries had that going for them. They started out of peasant revolts, and the illiterate peasants who barely knew what communism was, had no experience with democracy, and had no mechanism to organize and voice their complaints understandably fell under the rule of demagogues.\n\nSaying that the failure of communist states *proves* communism is inherently unsuccessful is seriously overstepping the natural conclusion from the evidence which is that \"communism probably won't work under the conditions in which it was tried.\"", "778" ], [ "ideals =/= brand. You seem to be conflating terms.\n\nEdit:\nIt might be worth considering the possibility that you're not a very cautious thinker. Jumping to conclusions about the cause of anonymous downvotes is evidence in that direction, as you have no means of knowing which part of your statement set people off. Personally, I downvoted you for your inability to discern the difference between ideals and the states that (allegedly) held those ideals; poorly thought out comments have no business being anywhere but the bottom. I understand that this sort of abstraction doesn't come naturally to everyone, but since you're on this subreddit, I'm assuming you're at least capable of some abstraction when thinking about computers, and I count this as another piece of evidence that you're the \"leap before you look\" type intellectually. I'd recommend a more tempered approach if you actually have any interest in intellectual honesty.", "263" ], [ "You do have a very distinct transition point. It's called the [ionization energy](_URL_0_) and is relatively well defined. However, in any sample, at any temperature, all you know is the [probability distribution](_URL_1_) of the kinetic energies of the particles in the sample, and it is statistically guaranteed that they will equilibrate to have nonuniform kinetic energy, even if they started with uniform kinetic energy. So there will always be less than 100% ionization of something, and the only randomness we're dealing with in the matter is the type that occurs when you have large numbers of things and incomplete information ([statistical mechanics](_URL_2_)).", "700" ], [ "Boiling is sharply mathematically defined to occur at the point where vapor pressure equals atmospheric pressure. Some molecules do exist in a transition layer outside of the liquid, and some of it does escape and become part of the surrounding gasses, but that does not mean the liquid is boiling.\n\nMelting is thought to be the temperature at which the average thermal vibration is greater in amplitude than interatomic distances. Again, some particles do not conform perfectly to the crystal lattice, as their kinetic energy is sufficiently high, but these solids have not melted.\n\nIn both cases, these definitions pertain to natural binary transitions of the *entire state of the system.* Ionization, while it's a binary transition, is a binary transition of *one particle.*", "982" ], [ "The internet is a game changer if we can keep it free. That's not a battle that's anywhere near decided. Plenty of people don't understand and don't care about the relationship between freedom of information and privacy on the internet and are instead easily swayed by security-centric arguments like \"encryption helps criminals\" without the complementary understanding that \"encryption prevents surveillance from everyone and this guarantees freedom of information.\"", "779" ], [ "Agreed. I think about all the time wasted in school doing useless crap instead, and it's infuriating. I remember in 4th grade I had an hour long daily class where we learned about \"Colorado History,\" and another year in elementary school we had an hour long section where learned how to do academic research projects (incorrectly and about 6 years too early). And they were still drilling us on basic arithmetic until the end of elementary school, as though memorizing tables of arithmetic has some value after you learn the basic procedure.... ugh. \n\nYeah, more than enough room for epistemology and ethics in there.", "832" ], [ "Fuck everything you just said. A **third party** claimed sexual assault. That deserves every measure of scrutiny that can be leveled at it.\n\nEdit: And, speaking in general, people should be defended against unfair accusations. It being a sexual assault charge does not change that the accusation is based on flawed premises. The fact that people are emotional about an issue does not mean we should regress to pre-enlightenment concepts of justice where we destroy people's lives and reputations the moment a finger gets pointed.", "878" ], [ "The emails are the primary topic of this whole fiasco. If you aren't even willing to look those up for yourself and read them, you really shouldn't be talking either way. Plenty of people in this thread have linked to them, and you can find them easily online.\n\nSorry I don't feel like reposting the material that everyone should have found and read as a prerequisite for responsibly talking about this subject..", "452" ], [ "> what’s the difference between saying sexist things because you’re sexist and saying sexist things because you “don’t understand gender politics very well”\n\nAh. Clever word trap you've devised. I'll just sidestep that.\n\n**None of these examples involve him saying sexist things for any reason**. Happy? Problem solved? I'm going to guess not, since you ignored what I was saying in that last post about none of those things being sexist. I'm going to guess it was too long for you or something silly like that.\n\n**Some things that make women uncomfortable or bother feminists are sexist. Not all things that make women uncomfortable or bother feminists are sexist.**", "181" ], [ "Posting the rest since they actually define the term aggregate. Apparently that's the wrong term. The open source definition says absolutely nothing about a single program with proprietary and non-proprietary components, whereas it's expressly forbidden by the GPL.\n\n > An “aggregate” consists of a number of separate programs, distributed together on the same CD-ROM or other media. The GPL permits you to create and distribute an aggregate, even when the licenses of the other software are nonfree or GPL-incompatible. The only condition is that you cannot release the aggregate under a license that prohibits users from exercising rights that each program's individual license would grant them.\n\n > Where's the line between two separate programs, and one program with two parts? This is a legal question, which ultimately judges will decide. We believe that a proper criterion depends both on the mechanism of communication (exec, pipes, rpc, function calls within a shared address space, etc.) and the semantics of the communication (what kinds of information are interchanged).\n\n > If the modules are included in the same executable file, they are definitely combined in one program. If modules are designed to run linked together in a shared address space, that almost surely means combining them into one program.\n\n > By contrast, pipes, sockets and command-line arguments are communication mechanisms normally used between two separate programs. So when they are used for communication, the modules normally are separate programs. But if the semantics of the communication are intimate enough, exchanging complex internal data structures, that too could be a basis to consider the two parts as combined into a larger program.\n\nYou probably shouldn't bother responding to this: It's more for other people to see than you. In any case, I won't be notified that you responded.", "440" ], [ "> Subscribe to Csail-related by filling out the following form. You will be sent email requesting confirmation, to prevent others from gratuitously subscribing you. Once confirmation is received, your request will be held for approval by the list moderator. You will be notified of the moderator's decision by email. **This is also a private list**, which means that the list of members is not available to non-members.\n\nDo they?", "546" ], [ "> Assuming she was being coerced by <PERSON>, he would have had every reason to tell her to conceal that from most of his associates.\n\nYou should take your own advice. Because this sentence is a direct followup to that sentence. It's his justification for that previous sentence. And his justification is that <PERSON>, the man we're assuming is coercing her, would have told her to conceal his coercion.\n\nIt's really funny how you tell me to look at the whole letter and then send the part that you like in isolation from the part that makes your interpretation wrong.\n\nI'm done talking to you, btw. I have no interest in people who simply can not understand nuanced English.", "603" ], [ "Could not disagree more with this rhetoric:\n\n > RMS treated the problem as being “let’s make sure we don’t criticize <PERSON> unfairly”, when the problem was actually, “how can we come to terms with a history of MIT’s institutional neglect of its responsibilities toward women and its apparent complicity with <PERSON>’s crimes”.\n\nRMS addressing the first issue in no way minimizes the second. That's a line of bullshit. By that logic, he should have been ousted a long time ago for not coming out and pledging his condemation of MIT's institutional neglect. It's a completely different subject from the specific one he was addressing with <PERSON>, and neither subject is exclusive of the other.\n\nIt's also dishonest to portray events as being the result of that. This fiasco is the direct result of dishonest media coverage and subsequent mob behavior.", "859" ], [ "It's amazing that you're a moderator here, yet I've seen you support pretty much every mischaracterization of the issue. And I've seen a suspicious number of your replies attached to [removed] posts. I suspect this will become one of them. You behave extremely irresponsibly given your position.\n\nBut to clarify, a witness claims that <PERSON> turned her down, and <PERSON> was not known to traffic sex workers in 2001, given that the first allegations came out in 2005.", "504" ], [ "It does make it so much better that he didn't say they consented.\n\nThink about if you were running a criminal enterprise, coercing your workers. Would you want your workers to be telling as many people as possible about your criminal dealings that might land you in prison? No. You'd threaten them to keep their mouths shut and act normal. That is what <PERSON> is saying, and it's a fine and reasonable thing to say.", "402" ], [ "> We do already live in that world - this is nothing new. Excluding some specific examples of protected speech, your employer can fire you for pretty much anything you say. At-will employment laws have only made that more the case.\n\nWhy is it concerning to make complaints against the current state of affairs? This isn't some fundamental truth of the world; it's just where we are right now, and it should be changed.\n\n > I'm not 100% sure this is an example of that anyway. Certainly his position at the FSF was a position of representing the organisation. I can't figure out what exactly he did for CSAIL at this point though, so I can't speak for that.\n\nI'm 100% sure that he's being removed from organizations for expressing some fairly harmless views in what is normally a low-visibility medium because the public was riled up by headlines that were lies and interpretations that were extremely slanted. I don't want to live my whole life in a world where this kind of thing happens every day to people. It's a bad situation.", "402" ], [ "> Would you prefer that employers be forced to hire someone who hurts their business?\n\nYes. If everyone had to do it, it wouldn't be significant. And I'm not really all that inclined to force people to hire someone they don't like. I am inclined to prevent them from firing people who are functional employees but express beliefs that the company doesn't endorse. Obviously your example about schools is different, since they're directly acting against their critical job functions.", "402" ], [ "> There is always an inherent power imbalance that cannot be ignored.\n\nThere are conceivable situations where this could be false. The power imbalance is typically inherent to it being a relative in a family power structure. A particularly capable child could be much more aware of the situation than a typical adult as well as situated in a position of higher power due to circumstance. And they could also be unrelated to the power structures that govern eachother's lives. Also, these concerns about power imbalance apply no less to adults than to children.\n\n > A child cannot consent because a child does not even know what they are consenting to and is easily manipulated by an adult (and not just by their relatives).\n\nSome children are very smart. Certainly that understanding comes with experience and intelligence and not magically with age.\n\n > There is no \"scientific study\" that supports that idea. There is just bullshit from people trying to justify taking advantage of a child.\n\nYour opinion on whether the peer-reviewed study in question is scientific is of no consequence. I somehow doubt you've even looked it up. You seem to be speaking almost entirely from a place of emotion.\n\nRegardless of your opinion, <PERSON> ackowledged the consent concerns and provided what he believed was a scientific study. You can assert what you want though, and I'll take it as what is is, an assertion.", "292" ], [ "> Under pressure or not, that's not the same as being fired\n\nIt's the same problem if the conversation went like this: \"You can go quietly or we can fire you\"\n\n > So if we want to fight against being able to fire people for stupid reasons, let's do that rather than getting bogged down in a specific case that doesn't even involve someone getting fired.\n\nI am not bogged down here. I have numerous issues with how this is playing out. The next time someone is fired and it strikes me as unjust, I'll be sure to voice my opinion then as well. Same for if it comes up in discussion.", "402" ], [ "Your characterization has some flaws. Let me fix that for you:\n\n > If a well known, ~~sleazy trafficker~~ well respected billionaire ~~offers me~~ hosts a conference at which ~~a 17 year old girl~~ a young, plausibly adult, woman of indeterminate age propositions me for sex\n\nThat's what he's saying happened. This was in 2001, and <PERSON> had not been accused by anyone at this point. And he's not saying <PERSON> directly offered anything to anyone.", "504" ], [ "> Are you suggesting that <PERSON> went their as a kind of researcher in disguise?\n\nNo one is saying that \n\n > Because as far as I know he went their because he wanted to have a good time with a group of rather creepy people, many of which were rapists.\n\nNo, he went there to host a conference with other prominent researchers, sci-fi authors, and other interested parties. <PERSON> brought the underage girls. Do you actually have any evidence \"many\" of those people were rapists? You're just irresponsibly throwing out accusations because that's the kind of careless person you are.", "504" ], [ "> If your turning up and staying at a conference where there are underage sex slaves something is wrong with you.\n\nYou mean *you're*, btw.\n\nGotcha, so if you show up at a venue where there happen to be underage sex slaves, even if there's no way for you to know that there are underage sex slaves, there's something wrong with you.\n\nGlad you clarified that.\n\nI'll go and waste my words on some slightly more sane people.", "894" ], [ "Correcting your grammar was incidental. My points stand on their own. Interesting how you latched onto that small extraneous part rather than the meat of what I was saying.\n\n > How many ordinary people just happen to hang around the kind of people who own sex slaves?\n\nImpossible to know. For all you and I know you hang around the kind of people who own sex slaves.\n\n > Hanging around that kind of person is a clear sign that your not a great guy.\n\nGuilt by association is silly enough. Guilt by association when you're ignorant of your associate's crimes is utterly baseless. I think that throwing out accusations without a shred of evidence makes you a pretty terrible person, but I'm not going to get on your case for all of those pedophilic sex slavers you may or may not be associating with without your knowledge.", "219" ], [ "> They seem to think they have to worship everything about <PERSON> to support some of the ideas he had or started. you don't.\n\nI've seen mostly the opposite perspective. \"You have to hate everything about <PERSON> and condemn him because he's a toe-cheese eating neck beard who unsettles women and smells bad and has wrong opinions. And he's ruining the free software movement by association, and that's why you should ignore that people have destroyed his reputation on the basis of blatant lies.\"", "249" ], [ "> You honestly think that it’s a vaguely common thing for people to have underage sex slaves?\n\nNo, I don't, and that wasn't my point. Too subtle, I suppose. I was pointing out that you don't know if you know any sex slavers, so you don't actually have any idea if you're also a weirdo monster who's guilty by association. I find that to be hilarious that you, by your own standard, could be just as guilty as the people you're criticizing.\n\n > Normal people don’t go to parties where there are underage sex slaves.\n\nI don't really give a shit if people are *normal*. I actually pity people who are overly concerned with normalizing themselves, so you have my sympathies for your condition.\n\nI care if people are *ethical*. If you don't know a crime is happening, you shouldn't be held accountable for being near it.\n\nI really have to be moving on. Courtesy notice that I've blocked you.", "544" ], [ "> The report calls for the public to be consulted “early and often” about the ethical issues that neural implants throw up\n\nAsking \"the public\" this early on about what they think about normal, healthy people walking around with surgically implanted brain chips sounds like a great way to get a good thing crippled or banned.", "772" ], [ "I've asked some people if they would replace one of their body parts with a hypothetical synthetic version that looks and feels like a normal body part but is better in every parameter, and quite a few have given responses like \"There's no way you could improve on what God gave you\" or \"But it wouldn't be me anymore.\" I'm by no means capable of providing a representative scientific sample of people's opinions, but I found these to be common enough that I worry about how those types of people might stifle the development of technologies that could transform all of human existence for the better.\n\nIf those opinions are common enough, or if a coalition of such oppositional opinions is large enough, they could create a legal climate early on that stifles body modification like this in the developmental phase, thwarting it before it can even get a significant population of human testers to showcase its potential.", "772" ], [ "Poisoning the well indeed. How about you back up your positions with logic rather than **guesses** that generalize the group affiliation of your opponents without evidence.\n\nYou're also wrong. It's extremely easy to spot alt-right types, because they're either suspiciously new accounts or they post on alt-right boards. And this is extremely visible, given that there exist extensions and user scripts that search for exactly these patterns. They constitute a very small number of the people posting here.\n\nThis sort of speculation is reprehensible.", "965" ], [ "> they always attack the free software movement whenever they have the chance.\n\nI agree with your observation. It's certainly convenient, and I dislike their influence on open source projects and the community at large. This is one of the reasons I dislike the <PERSON> approach to open source; I'd rather the community be smaller and have solidarity in the values of free software than to make compromises for resources at the price of slowly undermining our interests.", "370" ], [ "> However, there's also right wing people here trying to drive a wedge between the people who like diversity and more general free software types\n\nThe right wing people are unnecessary for the creation of this wedge. I would argue that few right wing people have been involved at all. The wedge is created by the differences between those who are careful not to destroy a man based on false assertions and those who are so morally outraged they don't care about the lies and will dig as far back as they feel into his past for more dirt to justify their outrage. And then they stretch the truth of what dirt they found anyway to make it seem worse than it is. Like his statements about pedophilia which included peer reviewed research and were qualified with a disclaimer explaining a range of cases in which a child's consent would be invalid, which should have established that he's open to logical explanations of why a child's consent might not be valid, but instead were interpreted flatly as \"<PERSON> is pro pedophilia.\" Saying there's no witch hunt when people are trying this hard to stretch the truth is laughable.\n\nAnd that email you quoted is largely irrelevant to how we should feel about this issue. It's pure opinion. And it was posted by someone who remains anonymous. Also it was one person's opinion, so characterizing it as \"<PERSON>'s own colleagues\" is another misrepresentation.", "965" ], [ "Granted.\n\nThis is big news. Governments around the world quickly implement systems to help shoppers reclaim their possessions. Millions of individuals worldwide are now employed doing previously unnecessary bureaucratic work to operate these new government programs. \n\nHomeless shelters become heavily regulated and licensed as governments seek to ensure proper accounting of people's property and minimize the financial burden of tracking and relocating people's property across so many locations. many smaller shelters close their doors, unable to meet the newly imposed regulatory demands.\n\nAs a minor side effect, having shopping carts in parking lots becomes illegal in many places, being seen as a convenience not worth all of the trouble. The same people who were once leaving shopping carts in their parking spots are now inconveniencing everyone by pulling their vehicles directly up to the storefront and putting on their emergency lights when they check out. Parking lots become significantly less navigable, as the queue for parking at the storefront backs up into the rest of the lot.", "681" ] ]
458
[ 12410, 1909, 13708, 19248, 19175, 1560, 18974, 12913, 24942, 14020, 9264, 15500, 17053, 7284, 12776, 12601, 1278, 1953, 21890, 13983, 4199, 9439, 2849, 5544, 18272, 17950, 18654, 11065, 25431, 25404, 75, 4940, 5169, 25442, 3793, 1616, 16548, 768, 22828, 22392, 21719, 1611, 25474, 21625, 25159, 21147, 20038, 6459, 19004, 6162, 13380, 23164, 628, 22103, 20899, 18562, 11984, 3332, 22315, 19677, 18881, 15906, 23570, 11103, 12640, 7051, 18785, 17829, 1095, 1193, 25533, 6739, 9004, 11548, 9913, 8118, 15441, 13573, 1478, 7136, 13723, 8449, 20063, 21213, 11460, 12442, 21354, 21293, 17070, 1102, 20286, 2545, 14635, 21070, 6361, 24083, 18819, 1079, 23042, 24593, 22626, 4055, 6082, 5238, 2403, 9191, 11571, 15263, 9104, 15511, 7278, 11831, 16960, 18859, 5653, 3721, 19725, 1756, 24983, 25317, 9669, 12984, 8713, 8395, 21284, 9643, 8742, 1406, 13906, 13061, 10851, 9139, 7568, 5018, 12461, 4277, 9828, 5962, 504, 7556, 11391, 18447, 3330, 20043, 21749, 14294, 20436, 16887, 15979, 14519, 12926, 5699, 10528, 10196, 19656, 18843, 4887, 8384, 3341, 3053, 13977, 12893, 2092, 16628, 1273, 5532, 21060, 10469, 22059, 19654, 18670, 5727, 11412, 10014, 15711, 8365, 18697, 10327, 17631, 8386, 6510, 7212, 24367, 3271, 24338, 18624, 11221, 999, 12902, 20628, 21322, 5682, 22235, 12448, 23124, 21274, 22027, 9367, 9815, 24303, 50, 5173, 19186, 8077, 7662, 1229, 19220, 10683, 7466, 887, 13162, 20033, 5209, 22424, 8232, 21648, 11748, 5338, 11111, 16990, 5782, 3786, 16329, 12599, 21166, 10027, 525, 11949, 18113, 822, 3719, 18690, 14214, 21680, 21660, 6666, 10916, 21219, 16803, 21120, 2521, 10959, 13219, 23766, 21158, 7104, 15992, 6869, 8058, 17417, 6543, 10599, 19683, 14336, 13411, 9726, 19559, 5988, 1948, 6850, 17300, 2107, 6402, 11038, 10921, 17227, 1573, 16015, 20339, 12462, 4464, 4399, 4939, 21922, 17040, 16378, 16258, 20289, 8630, 11580, 13200, 23131, 143, 9722, 22749, 12146, 3697, 15902, 3279, 20609, 20574, 1587, 8558, 23545, 24462, 21380, 16987, 12650, 15853, 6773, 25225, 25115, 20437, 6314, 22786, 13913, 8773, 3453, 4378, 23455, 1080, 4278, 3001, 15968, 13930, 5146, 10038, 14956, 20073, 13802, 12744, 8528, 22757, 24187, 11359, 15346, 19614, 23631, 5847, 14524, 21246, 15909, 21751, 13196, 17455, 8909, 6188, 14797, 19918, 8712, 4692, 3224, 4825, 24139, 17054, 12897, 20761, 6259, 20400, 21840, 3004, 16192, 6495, 8234, 16244, 10237, 8248, 23618, 5371, 13094, 23945, 4911, 15475, 343, 4953, 5610, 17821, 22964, 9409, 17030, 5708, 3409, 18765, 14255, 3816, 8406, 18033, 11707, 16869, 3428, 23764, 19639, 5759, 14602, 8570, 25455, 4249, 22668, 19223, 5765, 23486, 4499, 19285, 18720, 1668, 14901, 14226, 16241, 21168, 6731, 14870, 4411, 21433, 1103, 12222, 11972, 21861, 323, 13179, 20146, 17498, 17223, 4248, 24872, 18234, 367, 7187, 14982, 7197, 25371, 17424, 18871, 3954, 21044, 3286, 4835, 24424, 12361, 14701, 8217, 2226, 23335, 13398, 9760, 2917, 11892, 18024, 8221, 6710, 18265, 21253, 18420, 2223, 18543, 8993, 5556, 11590, 1580, 13261, 14604, 13600, 4268, 25201, 20645, 3640, 3090, 23091, 14896, 5644, 22422, 12225, 20530, 1011, 24503, 19342, 6803, 23293, 19259, 6002, 6779, 20902, 6514, 12894, 17739, 20280, 5572, 24009, 6103, 14786, 16033, 1745, 18247, 20364, 12267, 3568, 12987, 22706, 14401, 24240, 24247, 22213, 9737, 4450, 23239, 17818, 20147, 12412, 6989, 6137 ]
reddit_dump_0b_101010
[ [ "When they have started to slow down visibly, you can start to walk. As a driver, it's extremely, very annoying when people are hesitating at an intersection, you stop to let them cross, and they still spend two or three seconds seemingly just making sure that you are *really* stopped, as if you are just fucking with them and could launch for the Moon at any moment. I often have to wave people through, they are so indecisive.\n\nHere is what I do. Make eye contact with the driver, so you know they have acknowledged your existence; this is important. Make to cross. They will start slowing down, now you can really cross. I'm am not sure if it would work in America, but where I live, I never had a problem. Just don't be so indecisive. If people have already started slowing down, you gain nothing by wasting their time and yours too.", "523" ], [ "> And there's no legal requirement that Twitch not do that - in fact, they have no obligation to host any content whatsoever.\n\nWhich is fucking stupid, IMO. They are providing a service to you and they make money out of it. You are also a content creator of theirs, without whom the platform could literally not function. At that point, it should be their legal responsibility to provide a reasonable service and to treat you with respect and in good faith. This wild west thing on the internet isn't cutting it anymore, it's just making giant firms tons of money while letting individuals suffer and even lose their income. It's bullshit.", "138" ], [ "Look, once I am stopped, as in, not moving, not even an inch, what gain is there for someone to just stand and stare at me like a cow at a fence post they haven't seen before. There is literally no reason. \nI have already decided 5 seconds ago that I will stop for you. You most likely watched me come to a dead stop. I am looking at you. There is no reason on god's green earth no to get a move on. It has *nothing* to do with safety. Zero. Nada.", "248" ], [ "Look, two consenting 14-year-olds madly in love having sex is one thing, as long as they know all the basics, I don't see any real harm. Even an 18yo and a 15yo. Sex is natural and it's what your body wants to do at that age. \nThe wrongdoing starts when one of the parties is significantly older or has power or authority over the other. A 30yo seducing a teen or straight-up \"buying their services\" from a pimp is much, much worse than the above and it's what these laws are supposed to stop.\n\nIn most European countries, the law makes a distinction between these very different cases. In the US, afaik, you've just got your back-ass puritanical shit that can be selectively applied when you want to punish kids for not living by your 17th century standards.", "70" ], [ "Yes, that is the state of the current law. What I'm saying is, it's objectively wrong because it leads to a great power imbalance and abuse. \nThe content provider has no recourse against Twitch and Youtube, and they can kill their business or *just* their hobby channel that they spent a thousand hours making content for, and from which Youtube likely profited, for no wrongdoing whatsoever. Or, as an Android developer, Google could ban me for life and make me hardly employable because I used the word 'windows' in one of my app descriptions and their stupid bot \"thought\" I was impersonating MS - and yes, this shit happens regularly.\n\nRight now, the law does not provide any real protections for the little guys. What I'm saying is, this should urgently change.", "138" ], [ "Oh yeah, that definitely happens. I always understood that study as taking into account natural deaths, like such that feral cats have more stressful lives, no access to vets, regular food, etc, so they're not gonna live that long. But if it takes into account all causes of death, then it's definitely true for outdoor cats as well, but that way it seems way less insightful to me.", "287" ], [ "It's about power. When you are poor and stressed out about feeding your kids or paying rent or your student loan interests going up month-to-month, you don't have time to think about the big questions like how an equitable society would be like and how it could be achieved.\n\nWhen you can be fired from your $10/hour job for breaking your leg or your kid getting sick and not being able to make it to work, you won't be able to afford to protest or join an organized labour movement.\n\nIt's not even about the yachts and the jets and the stocks. It's about keeping the pesky lower classes out of the businesses of the aristocracy.", "246" ], [ "> The US hasn’t fought a just war since WWII\n\nI'm not American, but I think that the intervention in Kosovo and probably the first Gulf War were justified. I don't know enough about Korea to say, but that might have been too?\n\nNot all wars are strictly evil, sometimes you need a top dog like the US or the NATO to make sure everyone keeps playing fair or to put down an aggressorr, etc. The problem is when you start wars based on lies or pure ideology. That's my worldview of it, anyway.", "1014" ], [ "Hey dude! Sweet setup! Check out /r/simracing if you haven't yet, I'm pretty sure they'd be happy to help you get more out of the hobby! A few things I'd change, purely based on the pictures are the FOV (field of view) to be more realistic, ditch or lock the in-game steering wheel (so you don't see two wheels rotating in your periphery), and if your TV doesn't have a special low latency mode, you'd probably be better off with a gaming monitor closer to your eyes (if you have access to it, of course, this can be an expensive hobby if you really get into it).\n\nAlso, I see you're running Asseto Corsa, and you might already know this, but it has some fantastic mods that basically transform the game, namely Content Manager, Sol and Shaders Patch, and almost countless great track and car mods!\n\nHave fun!", "659" ], [ "Oh yeah, I forgot about those when making my argument! But they're not in every state, right?\n\nAlso, you are right in your second point, sex *might* be okay for a 14yo, marriage definitely is **not**, in virtually any cases. Forcing or even letting children to marry that young is in my opinion child abuse and should be outlawed in every civilized state. \nI am from Romania, and (many) Gypsies (think Borat, that was a real Gypsy village in the movies) here regularly make their children marry at around that age. Is your girl a 14-year-old in 8th grade and is doing good in school despite her medieval and probably abusive home environment and absolutely horrible socio-economic circumstances? Doesn't matter, into forced marriage and baby-making with her! A friend of mine was the class teacher of one of these young girls (probably more), and she could do nothing to persuade the parents to not make their child marry against her will. Of course, it's a *traditional practice*, so the state doesn't want to intervene in these cases. It's fucking horrible.", "70" ] ]
4
[ 5805, 20556, 1806, 19305, 5667, 21504, 11923, 4651, 8422, 22606, 9939, 9740, 5731, 13114, 24568, 6105, 16872, 3564, 18707, 2667, 16115, 13347, 17801, 15526, 7433, 11700, 24826, 9228, 10564, 5339, 201, 7999, 14415, 9344, 6873, 5578, 13768, 3612, 19056, 2624, 11977, 23471, 7215, 21812, 3395, 285, 102, 1145, 2395, 827, 16590, 17422, 12146, 6906, 12860, 3757, 19138, 21906, 8217, 22746, 19900, 16566, 22117, 2895, 6148, 20171, 24503, 6972, 10151, 8118, 20268, 18842, 14756, 10449, 13583, 4115, 676, 16978, 16019, 10465, 20076, 24483, 63, 1362, 7411, 869, 17201, 12464, 20509, 11831, 14968, 9910, 2738, 15614, 15220, 23586, 9920, 5988, 4501, 18518, 15233, 1095, 18190, 12493, 18189, 4217, 11129, 8617, 14449, 6681, 23246, 11164, 18206, 10683, 14938, 22998, 3433, 19861, 6137, 10034, 20364, 8014, 9940, 710, 13634, 15731, 23318, 16054, 1727, 13032, 11984, 13100, 7137, 2102, 23239, 21803, 6176, 6420, 23353, 23312, 25117, 4165, 22688, 3482, 21991, 5450, 4202, 25472, 16353, 10467, 3117, 8248, 19712, 10177, 367, 9769, 16619, 21972, 24247, 17070, 16463, 2872, 21506, 25541, 20625, 19083, 22886, 10470, 23222, 14074, 25463, 7466, 1573, 3567, 8978, 1305, 612, 18534, 25021, 24085, 887, 3504, 2807, 15188, 1115, 21779, 19834, 12477, 11441, 3306, 8488, 4418, 12578, 5793, 15979, 19058, 15067, 12933, 13322, 11057, 19239, 25505, 4532, 12772, 686, 18731, 3717, 21438, 20809, 10514, 14519, 19473, 2707, 23463, 13563, 15133, 13077, 12159, 13434, 12866, 21433, 16329, 21108, 25317, 2589, 14535, 11679, 14834, 24756, 11660, 16429, 25274, 25133, 14527, 23785, 22003, 8128, 13785, 11754, 5611, 10186, 22741, 4664, 7709, 22547, 18034, 14913, 5610, 17826, 4933, 13094, 8410, 19892, 20227, 6045, 4679, 11030, 3387, 3259, 15818, 11367, 1155, 22920, 21749, 1229, 13179, 10947, 6482, 16499, 19912, 4464, 1884, 11386, 15401, 25449, 8077, 23049, 8510, 22795, 14823, 13718, 15628, 1692, 14111, 3933, 7708, 5755, 9191, 7278, 11569, 3332, 22341, 12333, 16987, 12276, 19268, 15882, 15909, 326, 6499, 2053, 14600, 1011, 4449, 22749, 22235, 4929, 24564, 9742, 21177, 16730, 19792, 17058, 24328, 23492, 844, 20936, 8046, 9796, 10482, 24834, 13597, 2478, 17677, 20974, 8430, 9791, 23268, 1365, 3121, 12062, 12707, 11056, 11395, 15935, 21607, 10842, 2563, 20343, 1752, 18523, 15707, 8143, 25506, 25291, 12420, 8836, 16611, 7870, 16628, 22828, 16167, 18287, 16496, 6314, 7023, 3862, 14181, 21631, 19668, 18844, 7036, 21331, 12359, 14801, 9450, 4631, 25198, 11468, 15081, 16666, 2162, 9461, 11750, 7289, 13012, 12700, 22733, 8870, 10761, 23444, 10777, 15688, 10386, 4076, 3352, 24934, 449, 17805, 23155, 1431, 10606, 21140, 2760, 6886, 5235, 2909, 5561, 17840, 8712, 4655, 7277, 8690, 15271, 22424, 4362, 14520, 20080, 15019, 23665, 20276, 4456, 7990, 5979, 9530, 15648, 2769, 4067, 493, 21664, 16124, 23281, 15500, 23654, 11012, 22453, 17571, 19763, 1973, 3964, 13401, 5434, 4250, 17498, 627, 17178, 5173, 17896, 22237, 2348, 21632, 17970, 16635, 10824, 2295, 7735, 11280, 15981, 491, 18061, 3216, 20938, 13360, 11128, 5018, 14048, 404, 24007, 4850, 17956, 2933, 3334, 3622, 11432, 5689, 3244, 16385, 18499, 11169, 20844, 8394, 8395, 3299, 3816, 10350, 13073, 22299, 25193, 20147, 21492, 1920, 5443, 19779, 17790, 15321, 24344, 9143, 16452, 16114, 7353, 25289, 24859, 15671, 24200, 23562, 6402, 12616, 8414, 12650 ]
reddit_dump_0fiuco
[ [ "you got to love Fox double standards. Their president ( the one that mocked <PERSON> for wearing the mask all the times ) forced a security guy to ride with him maskless inside a car right when he was covid positive just for a photo op, and they did give zero shit. now <PERSON> takes the mask off 1 minute ( after having been vaccinated ) during the inauguration and it's kinda like he decided to shit on the flag. Here we go again.", "6" ], [ "i dont give a fuck about him personally he can throw himself in a river for all i care. i give a fuck about the people around him. Unless he is alone in the world he will now turn to his relatives for some moneys. what you do if your <PERSON> calls you and tells you \"hey, <PERSON> has given all our moneys to <PERSON> cause our pastor told him so, now we are broke and if you don't give us a couple of grands we'll be sleeping under a bridge in a week\"", "974" ], [ "isn't it better to take a little time to collect enough evidences to throw at <PERSON>? We don't know what the FBI can find in two weeks, maybe you'll discover one of those traitors had a meeting with one of <PERSON>'s kids or <PERSON>, it gets more interesting if the accusation moves from \"your words have inspired these people to attack the senate\" to \"we have evidences you directly told some of these people to attack the senate\"", "776" ], [ "I felt like this a year ago when covid appeared. I was following news from Wuhan when most people were ignoring them. I started for the first time in my life too stockpile and make preparations when no news in my country was picking up yet anything about the virus.\n I started to think I was gone crazy cause I was waiting for the apocalypse and nothing was happening. A month later I was the only one with masks, hand sanitizer, not making queues at the supermarket and with an idea of what was happening. But those few days when I was waiting for a sign and nothing was happening really made me question my sanity. It's not a fun place to be mentally", "110" ], [ "Imagine being world class smart, top class in your field, smart to the point that smart people around the world look at you thinking wish I was that smart, and instead of helping the country your concern becomes not to piss a manbaby as dumb as a rock that thinks he knows best and needs to be kept at bay or he starts suggesting people to inject bleach in their veins", "438" ], [ "Funny thing is that even if <PERSON> manages to catch one streamer the result will be:. \n- he is not American so not subjected to American laws.\n- good luck getting him deported to the u.s. for this kind of lawsuit\n- even if he manages to sue him and deport him this dude will open a go fund me and the internet will make him a rich man just to piss off the guy who believed he could kill piracy.", "138" ], [ "This is spot on. I've said it from the beginning, America dodged a bullet only because he was a lazy incompetent man. If the country falls under the delusion that this is the proof American democracy is invulnerable and will be here forever, next time we all have a rude awakening. And my fear is that <PERSON> is too old and of too good nature to be the man we need to face this situation, I hope he proves me wrong, this is the moment when you need to have the nerves to kill baby <PERSON> in the cradle barehanded whatever it takes", "725" ], [ "i bet in the next years the number of mass shootings will increase. <PERSON> and <PERSON> have left behind a mass of rebels without a cause. Rejected by society, they are now more angry than before, without leaders that legitimize their rage, unable to reflect on themselves and armed. \n\nWhat do you think it's more probable that a guy like this does next? Starts to work on himself, looks himself in the mirror and becomes a better person? or thinks all his misery is because of blacks, gays and liberals who have stolen his election and his dream to become someone in a white christian ( nazi ) america and attacks with a rifle the first LGBT parade that pass next to his town?", "1016" ], [ "of course they do but they will hide behind the protection free speech gives them, just like in tribunals they hide behind the fact that they are not an actual news channel so they are allowed to tell lies. So in the end they risk nothing cause they are not as stupid as their viewer and they know how to save their own ass.\n\nin the end if i tell you \"go and kill your friend <PERSON>\" and you do it, i'm legally responsible.\n\nbut if i spend ten years telling you how your friend <PERSON> is a piece of shit and he's trying to steal everything you have, and one day you decide to go and kill him on your own they can't touch me.", "624" ], [ "> The network could potentially face consequences for publishing outright false information, such as the lies that prompted a voting machine software company to take legal action over libelous/slanderous claims in civil lawsuits. \n\ni never watch fox so i don't know. When they talk for example of \"rigged voting machine\" do they say \"we have proof voting machines were rigged\" or they say \"<PERSON> say he has proof voting machines were rigged\" and then talks only about that? these people usually know how to dance around words in a way that they can tell you what they want to tell you without actually telling it to you so that they can never been found accountable.", "6" ], [ "The only hope for Britain is that <PERSON> is ok with what the EU is offering and is just playing along to look tough with the public opinion and in the hope to just get as much as he can from this, and if nothing new is put on the table at the last hour he will go \"ok we take it\". If that's the case it could be even considered a good move, if it works. But he would be literally gambling his country on the goodwill of the EU", "631" ], [ "question: so far the deaths data is produced mainly by hospitals.\n\nwhen people won't be able to find a bed anymore and they'll die at home, how will it be dealt? I mean, you get counted as covid death? you get counted as dead but not with covid? what i'm saying is, are we at risk that will come a point when you'll see number of deaths stabilizing only because hospitals are at capacity and you'll have a death surge that will be uncounted in the stats? If you die at home they test you for covid or they'll just bury you and that's it and we will be able only years later to get the full picture?", "912" ], [ "i've checked out [OP posting history](_URL_0_) he is either a low quality troll or just too stupid to be worth an aswer. I mean, don't take my word, go check it out yourself.\n\nthe fact that he is at the same time a brexit supporter and one of those thinking the american election was rigged by the democrats and <PERSON>'s laptop story was true tells everything there's to know. let's just call a spade a spade", "988" ], [ "hard to find depends on where you live. You're in new york? probably they will offer three or four times the regular nurse wage and people will move from all over the country to help. So new yorkers are good.\n\nnow, if you're living in a rural community in alabama or mississipi, one of those who are coincidentally both the most anti masks and offering the lowest wages, you'll be in for a nasty christmas surprise.", "237" ], [ "Meaning your book is full of lies and you allow yourself to pick and choose what you want to be historical fact and what you want to consider just a metaphor. If the flood is just a tale, how do I know <PERSON> talking with god or the whole life of <PERSON> aren't aswell. I mean it's not that a guy walking on water and resurrecting dead people makes much more sense than the flood. So much for a godly inspired perfect book", "487" ], [ "as i said you are proving that you're arbitrarely deciding what is <PERSON> and what is not, moving the goalpost as you please. That's definitely not being honest. Nowhere in the bible there's written that the flood is a metaphor and you should read it as such. But since science and historians have proven beyond any reasonable doubt that it could have never happened, then \"hey that story is just a mith, but all the others in my special book are true believe me. Well of course apart from genesis. and apart from the guy that was living in a fish, and sodom and gomorrah. Oh yes and all the patriarchs living 500 years old, of course it doesn't make sense. But the rest is all true believe me. sort of. But still...\".\n\nAlso it's important to notice that there's **not a single historical or archeological evidence for the existence of <PERSON>**. And believe me they've looked for it.", "487" ], [ "the talmud doesn't provide historical evidence. And if you wanna make us the courtesy of quoting the way <PERSON> and <PERSON> mention <PERSON> it will be clear to everybody that aswell is not historical evidence.\n\nlittle detail: <PERSON> was born after <PERSON> was dead even if we assume he existed. meaning what he wrote was possibly at least 20 years after his supposed death. How could he provide historical evidence, i really don't know.\n\n<PERSON> was born 20 years after <PERSON>.\n\nif you wanna be taken seriously don't just copy/paste tidbits from christian site without even really knowing what you're quoting.\n\nby the way if you ask me, my opinion is the same of almost all historians, much probably a guy named <PERSON> lived in palestine around 2000 years ago and lived as a preacher, simply because it wasn't uncommon at all. He lived Just as like <PERSON> or <PERSON> or <PERSON> existed for real. Just like them he became very popular. It's just that None of them was a prophet, god sent or the son of god even if religions have been made around them making such claims.", "487" ], [ "very hard to follow indeed. In fact I guess when you watch star wars or Lord of the Rings on tv you don't think <PERSON> and <PERSON> are evil assholes cause they are just a fictional caracter. please try harder next time.\n\n\\[edit\\] the point made by the user that cowardly deleted his post ( shows you how strong his knowledge of his own faith is ) was that since i don't think God exists it doesn't make sense for me to call him evil.", "754" ], [ "I think buddhism is no more a suicide cult than christianity or islam, where your goal is not live your life, but live your life in a way that will grant you heaven, wich usually comes true sacrificy and suffering.\n\nNirvana is a methapisical place/state that you reach when you disentangle your self from the cicle of life and death. in a sense Nirvana is something close to defeating death like embracing god is in christianity. \n\ntherefore even if i don't embrace the buddisth view anymore that i embrace any other religion i think you've got it mostly wrong. You came to wrong conclusions cause you started from a wrong understanding of it", "943" ], [ "and how do you know his account is reliable? we know about <PERSON> even less than we know about <PERSON>.\n\nBut apart from that, the actual important fact is that <PERSON>'s gospel is aligned with <PERSON> and <PERSON> and all three are believed ( and i'm not talking about internet conspiracy, i'm talking about academics and theologians speaking ) to be derived from a common source, guess you've heard about the Q source if you have done your homeworks. In that sense <PERSON>'s gospel is really nothing special compared to the other two synoptic ones.\n\nby the way, i hope you realize the so called gospels of <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON> and <PERSON> were not really written by them and it's just a tradition to attribute the gospels to them.", "487" ] ]
36
[ 17024, 2875, 16626, 19817, 15601, 15997, 18417, 18491, 6650, 4356, 19202, 19793, 18448, 1113, 4881, 1469, 558, 6792, 978, 1416, 7631, 12317, 5853, 22041, 11853, 16507, 703, 22385, 2940, 24713, 19927, 17866, 18872, 11477, 2828, 296, 5958, 19418, 6704, 8266, 24600, 20984, 16440, 7518, 18694, 1742, 24254, 6191, 926, 23675, 18010, 589, 5425, 17391, 7277, 10351, 19549, 23236, 17782, 4637, 15830, 1067, 7376, 1937, 20366, 2349, 25182, 936, 6009, 23544, 4456, 15512, 5707, 13877, 19996, 2885, 9470, 3772, 4781, 5701, 20549, 7854, 22993, 14980, 16561, 5194, 15106, 19848, 23634, 6308, 24474, 5230, 24006, 14527, 21437, 17801, 25294, 4798, 11276, 21826, 5600, 3438, 20764, 8723, 16930, 11651, 16790, 13552, 19833, 15264, 22988, 4775, 17805, 3674, 3976, 16513, 15054, 5280, 7884, 17253, 7726, 23885, 21101, 22840, 24822, 15756, 1412, 13996, 15883, 4051, 24365, 15587, 1365, 6004, 12657, 25044, 9285, 19760, 22061, 5619, 19934, 11865, 24827, 12669, 14239, 22383, 18863, 21473, 25023, 18262, 18886, 4745, 12163, 5790, 8864, 11954, 14934, 2410, 21852, 20435, 23819, 5112, 988, 23469, 15774, 20982, 2317, 11901, 9298, 3172, 10562, 22563, 18409, 16155, 12527, 9691, 5513, 12226, 12243, 19911, 1370, 15619, 6548, 19917, 23422, 23578, 10659, 10564, 5815, 2574, 756, 4035, 12509, 22799, 15648, 5376, 23913, 2689, 13042, 10166, 7157, 21023, 11314, 724, 6049, 22229, 17722, 13539, 8672, 22436, 7734, 14736, 17097, 9862, 25170, 5675, 8316, 18087, 9753, 16727, 5771, 5510, 947, 14131, 22982, 16247, 21623, 860, 11639, 18507, 1752, 5080, 20226, 19402, 19180, 25146, 9809, 7036, 17292, 12247, 13790, 1886, 4270, 9529, 11441, 20278, 4442, 15684, 12246, 4476, 10484, 5832, 18972, 4272, 10429, 12149, 7301, 22529, 18429, 23513, 11808, 1759, 23805, 13881, 9588, 16482, 17178, 19473, 20707, 17759, 9695, 3668, 18686, 12847, 20657, 13613, 6906, 23050, 17466, 9619, 7989, 8434, 17464, 17465, 16667, 4814, 6419, 2014, 4810, 20515, 15215, 463, 22950, 9520, 7699, 8392, 4115, 3169, 13799, 13242, 4194, 11956, 2048, 17770, 2527, 24932, 20443, 107, 12500, 15093, 7186, 18540, 9718, 2540, 16956, 23287, 8921, 3983, 17808, 8307, 1111, 13420, 5070, 10798, 20465, 21815, 16648, 10243, 21592, 4917, 25004, 9558, 2945, 1293, 11035, 11100, 24848, 9966, 19130, 8617, 5164, 3980, 17326, 15699, 25464, 20354, 25396, 9347, 3045, 8485, 20916, 23902, 19988, 22400, 5547, 14088, 10326, 17337, 23779, 2987, 2003, 5622, 20592, 25036, 23833, 17472, 5190, 3865, 24805, 25523, 11500, 216, 3144, 25536, 3410, 8241, 7026, 18032, 6965, 218, 10216, 25494, 9804, 2068, 20886, 556, 272, 21971, 7155, 2200, 9023, 23462, 24401, 24884, 4310, 16651, 11872, 22621, 21982, 22451, 15188, 7898, 4206, 2442, 21028, 15982, 17308, 20365, 899, 2921, 17743, 13966, 4684, 24, 2224, 19895, 8011, 1826, 12834, 6127, 2964, 5523, 24101, 9078, 21188, 15760, 18114, 16558, 19427, 19922, 22154, 16605, 16098, 17127, 14805, 18349, 3241, 13397, 20128, 17350, 5741, 17670, 20022, 22212, 21929, 18298, 21033, 9040, 19306, 3353, 10710, 6633, 12542, 5705, 19399, 12970, 8205, 18244, 8154, 24756, 22907, 21582, 14666, 3755, 8653, 22892, 14752, 3683, 17668, 228, 17906, 297, 21643, 6662, 4138, 11084, 7076, 6351, 14750, 873, 21849, 13096, 19814, 10976, 24549, 1019, 18080, 11884, 4169, 25088, 16476, 554, 23914, 10079, 5849, 8625, 23115, 5477, 14974 ]
reddit_dump_0nlyhalfjewish
[ [ "What does the slogan “Make America Great Again” mean if not a criticism of the current state of the country?\n\nIn <PERSON>’s inauguration speech, he called out the following:\n\n- Mothers and children trapped in poverty in our inner cities\n\n- rusted out factories scattered like tombstones across the landscape of our nation.\n\n- An education system that leaves our young and beautiful students deprived of all knowledge\n\n- crime and gangs and drugs which deprive people of so much unrealised potential\n\n- America’s infrastructure has fallen into disrepair and decay\n\n - the wealth, strength and confidence of our country has dissipated over the horizon\n\nIs that not bashing America?", "27" ], [ "Three of the 4 women in the squad are Americans from birth. They are as American as many people’s parents whose grandparents came here from another country. <PERSON> came here at age 10. She became a citizen at age 17. Her father encouraged her to understand and appreciate democracy and she went with him to caucuses to have that experience. She served as his interpreter, so she was actively engaged and not just standing in a corner on her phone like kids today. Is she not exactly the type of immigrant we want here?", "5" ], [ "Heard it said that a portion of every nation is susceptible to messages of xenophobia and demagoguery. We are immune to it only by ensuring those who stoke those flames do not get into power.\n\nWhat we have across the globe right now is a push for nationalism the likes of which gave rise to some of the worst leaders and greatest atrocities the world has ever known. While we can never stamp out hatred entirely, we must call it what it is, strip those who inspire hatred of their power, and demand civility and cooperation from those who represent us.", "725" ], [ "The GOP is the party of feelings and opinions over facts. When pressed, I find that the GOP, particularly <PERSON> supporters, don't know why they think what they think. They just do. \n\nThis is not the way to decide who to vote for. Would you buy a house because you liked how it made you feel without knowing anything about it? Would you attend a college you knew nothing about but you got a good feeling when you saw pictures of the campus?\n\nThis is where we are. People deciding the fate of our nation because of feelings and opinions.", "800" ], [ "Yes, it is. They have no facts to back up their opinions. Here's an example from reddit. It's a conversation from AskTrumpSupporters sub about healthcare regulations. I've included the source for full disclosure.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n**Me:** What government regulations on healthcare would you do away with?\n\n & #x200B;\n\n**Trump Supporter:** I'd go with all of them, but I'm a bit nutty like that. ;)\n\n & #x200B;\n\n**Me:** Can you name one?\n\n & #x200B;\n\n**Trump Supporter:** Yes.\n\n & #x200B;\n\n**Me:** Would you please name that regulation?\n\n & #x200B;\n\n**Trump Supporter:** Obamacare, for starters.\n\n & #x200B;\n\nAs you can see, this guy is trying to evade all real conversation even though the sub is for the purpose of asking <PERSON> supporters questions. \n\n & #x200B;\n\nSource: [_URL_0_](_URL_1_)", "30" ], [ "How much of the budget is spent on standardized testing? From what I’ve found online, it ranges from about $50 to $150 per student. I have to think there are bigger budget items to go after.\n\nAnd would poor kids even go to school? The cheapest private school in my area is $6000/year per student. I think about 40% of American children would just not get an education.", "610" ], [ "He already had these opinions. This was just adding fuel to the fire of his existing hatred and disgusting nature. The fact that he can't see how disgusting his comments are, particularly the chant at the NC rally, mean he's blind to his own racism. He's like a slave owner who says \"I'm not racist! Hell, I let those people into my home! I eat the food they cook! I let them serve it, too!\"", "614" ], [ "This interview makes me want to vomit. <PERSON> literally says that Republicans want to lean into the constitution, into the rule of law.\n\nReally? Is that why <PERSON> uses executive orders and emergency declarations to get his way? Our constitution says that Congress writes the bills that become law. Can you guys name the last time in the <PERSON> administration that this happened? How much has happened that bypassed ALL of our Constitutional checks and balances? How many times has <PERSON> acted in ways that are in direct opposition to what the American people want? \n\nIf you think he has, you are fooling yourself. A recent poll found that 63% of Americans think the country is on the wrong track.", "800" ], [ "It’s really weird to me since every other Indian person I know is proud of their heritage. Women don’t take the last names of their husband. They don’t have American sounding nick names and they don’t give up their religion.\n\nThat’s what is so awful to me about the Republican idea of assimilation. In their mind she did what you are supposed to do. They don’t want to embrace other cultures; they expect you to reject yours.", "255" ], [ "The Democrats last pick for President was a moral man, a loving father, a faithful husband, an eloquent orator, and a calm leader.\n\nThe Republicans last pick for President is an amoral man, an absent father, a cheating husband, a rambling buffoon, and a derisive coward. \n\nI think we can clearly see how far apart the parties are now. It’s clear which party has sense, compassion, and morals.", "313" ], [ "Your narrative is false. If your economy is built on debt, it’s not a strong economy.\n\nRepublicans have increased the national debt more than Democrats. _URL_0_\n\nYou think we are crippling the economy? Between the tariffs and strong arming companies to onshore jobs, we will all be paying the price. \n\nRepublicans support a social safety net that benefits them. They like socialized healthcare, but only Medicare since old people vote (R) more often.\n\nAs for education, colleges are liberal. I will grant you that. But young people won’t turn toward a racist president. Young people are much more liberal on social issues and <PERSON>’s current rhetoric is going to backfire.\n\n_URL_1_", "612" ], [ "What does the KKK of today stand for?\n\nThe White Race\nThe irreplaceable hub of our Nation, our Christian faith, and the high levels of Western culture and technology.\n\nAmerica First\nFirst before any foreign or alien influence or interest, and a foreign policy of military non-intervention.\n\nThe Constitution\nAs originally written and intended. The finest system of government ever conceived by man, which is based on the Holy Bible and Christian Common Law.\n\nFree Enterprise\nPrivate property and ownership of business, but an end to high-finance exploitation. We advocate economic nationalism and we oppose the Federal Reserve bank and so-called \"free trade\".\n\nPositive Christianity\nThe right of the American people to practice their Christian faith - including prayer in schools. Many Klan members and supporters are involved with the growing Christian Identity religion, which continues to unite the Christian Patriot Movement in the United States.\n\nSource: _URL_0_", "1020" ], [ "Let me out this another way. If the Republican Party was for raising taxes on the rich to help even out the huge wealth disparity in America, help the poor, and combat climate change, you would switch parties. \n\nParties court large blocks of ideologically similar voters in an attempt to gain numbers. A party with no members has no power. This is how political switches happen. \n\nThe sad thing is that <PERSON> doesn’t realize he is alienating more people than he’s attracting. And god help us all if he does gain more support because we don’t need an authoritarian in the White House.", "313" ], [ "Lol! Mental slavery? How about actual racism which goes on to this day. “They sure got a lot of them over in that county” I heard said not too long ago. “Them” means blacks. Who said it? A Republican and a <PERSON> voter who switched parties 20 years ago. \n\nWelcome to the reality of the rural South, where you are sure to see a Confederate flag every few miles. Knock on their door and ask them who they vote for.", "1020" ], [ "I'm going to be a supportive woman and call you out on this. Specifically, how harsh you are on women in this post. Yes, people lie. Yes, some women may be wrong about some things.\n\nBut if you think \"calling women out on their bullshit\" is supportive, you are mistaken. If you come hard at someone, they will just come back hard at you. They won't want to listen because who really wants to listen to someone who thinks they know it all and feels entitled to call you out from up on their high horse.\n\nFunny thing is that I do believe supportive women should be able to tell each other when one of them is making a bad choice. You know a woman who is cheating on her husband? That's an example. A good friend would try to talk her friend about it.\n\nAnyway, I think you need to find a better way to talk to your friends. Of course, maybe I just don't know your friends and you are fine with this, but I can't imagine talking to my friends the way you phrased anything in your post.", "971" ], [ "I see. I guess I try to be more civil than you even when I'm online. I can state my opinions clearly without getting upset, which I believe I did.\n\nAs to your friend in her abusive situation, it is likely she is afraid to leave. I helped someone in this situation before, so I'll give you the same advice. Of course she needs to go if she's being abused. She probably doesn't see how. She sees some end point where she's not in her current situation, but not how to get there. What she needs to see is the next step. It needs to be clearly laid out in front of her. And it needs to be simple enough to get to that she's safe when she takes that step.\n\nHope your friend turns out ok.", "119" ], [ "He said it wouldn’t stop until it’s clear what the rules are. That’s bullshit for exactly your point; this is a complex issue. This is like putting up a speed limit sign. But we can all agree on some basics, except <PERSON> says we can’t because we don’t know what the rules are. That’s simply not true.", "462" ], [ "The power of individuals?\n\nThe Trump administration has announced a new \"expedited removal\" policy that makes deportation faster and easier for immigration enforcement agents. It empowers the agency to stop any person, anywhere in the U.S., and for any reason, and demand they prove either they're a citizen or have lived in the U.S. for at least two years. If they can't do either, they're deported without seeing a judge.\n\n_URL_1_\n\n_URL_0_", "796" ], [ "From her follow up tweet:\n\n“I heard from Jewish orgs. that my use of the word ‘hypnotize’ and the ugly sentiment it holds was offensive. I spent ... little energy [in] disavowing the anti-Semitic trope I unknowingly used, which is unfortunate and offensive.”\n\nShe’s already apologized more than <PERSON> ever has and acknowledged she said something inappropriate.\n\nShe’s stronger and more of a leader than <PERSON> ever will be, just by those two things.\n\nThe height of hypocrisy for <PERSON> to call her out when he has NEVER apologized for the hundreds of disgusting things he’s said and done since 2015.", "759" ], [ "Because she didn't offer strong enough words. Interesting. I find the actions of Republicans much lower, including giving Republican polling data to Russians, mocking disabled people, locking up children in cages, etc., etc.\n\nThose are direct actions, not opinions given about events. <PERSON> had nothing to do with the events of 9/11, so I find it pretty low that somehow her choice of words matters more than what people actually do.", "557" ], [ "You expect a woman to speak about a particular topic in a particular way because she shares a religion with those who carried out attacks. \n\nIf that is your expectation due to such a weak association, do you not expect the president to speak out against the actions of the people he hired for his campaign and against the Border Agents who are acting on his orders? After all, that's not a weak association. It's either a direct association or direct orders.", "308" ], [ "Well, how about this one. This is why <PERSON> doesn’t speak out, because he actually authorizes abuses:\n\nThe Trump administration has announced a new \"expedited removal\" policy that makes deportation faster and easier for immigration enforcement agents. It empowers the agency to stop any person, anywhere in the U.S., and for any reason, and demand they prove either they're a citizen or have lived in the U.S. for at least two years. If they can't do either, they're deported without seeing a judge.\n\nSo, any border agents can stop anyone they want, demand papers, and if you can’t provide them they can jail and deport you without due process. \n\nIf I were Hispanic, I’d sure as hell not support <PERSON> just on this item alone.", "796" ], [ "From our Constitution \n\nSection 9\n1: The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.\n\n2: The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.\n\nNote the second item. These people have the right to have their case heard before a judge. And public safety is not an issue, although right-wing news outlets want you to think that. But the facts show that American citizens commit more crimes than illegal immigrants.", "796" ], [ "To deny fear of men is to be stupid. If I’m walking down the street alone at night and I see I’m being followed by someone, if it’s a man I am concerned and take steps to protect myself. If it’s a woman, I am not really worried. Why? Because women don’t rape women and rarely commit crimes against another person except their partner.\n\nHow many women are arrested for breaking into someone’s home, stealing things, etc.?\n\nMen can be dangerous to women. We all know this.", "878" ], [ "The media needs views. One person can be outraged and vocal and it will make the news if it supports a mindset that will drive votes and divide people. \n\nThe thing is, I don’t see this on MSM. I see daily on right wing media. Here’s an example from Fox News:\n\nMen fined for eating raw squirrels at vegan event, causing 'significant distress' to attendees\n\nReally? One nut job at a vegan event. \n\n_URL_0_\n\nDid I mention this happened in the UK? Why is that on Fox News under Food and Entertainment? Why?", "6" ], [ "\"I asked him very nicely to look into my political opponent. Look, we are even appearing on TV together! Look how much we like one another and smile at the camera!\"\n\nJesus, is this real?! It's insane! \n\n\"I can't be doing anything underhanded because I am happy to appear on TV with the guy who I held up funding in exchange for dirt on <PERSON>! Happy day!\"", "481" ], [ "The end of Mueller's summary of Part 1 is shown below. <PERSON> talks about people pleading the 5th, of deleting evidence, of claiming immunity when they did NOT have grounds to do so, of documents overseas they could not obtain, of evidence that they could not use in court, and the final sentence of the summary ends as follows:\n\n\"the Office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report.\"\n\nThe investigation did not always yield admissible information or testimony, or a complete picture of the activities undertaken by subjects of the investigation. Some individuals invoked their Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination and were not, in the Office's judgment, appropriate candidates for grants of immunity. The Office limited its pursuit of other witnesses and information—such as information known to attorneys or individuals claiming to be members of the media—in light of internal Department of Justice policies. See, e.g., Justice Manual §§ 9-13.400, 13.410. Some of the information obtained via court process, moreover, was presumptively covered by legal privilege and was screened from investigators by a filter (or \"taint\") team. Even when individuals testified or agreed to be interviewed, they sometimes provided information that was false or incomplete, leading to some of the false-statements charges described above. And the Office faced practical limits on its ability to access relevant evidence as well-numerous witnesses and subjects lived abroad, and documents were held outside the United States.\n\nFurther, the Office learned that some of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated—including some associated with the Trump Campaign—deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long-term retention of data or communications records. In such cases, the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with other known facts.\n\nAccordingly, while this report embodies factual and legal determinations that the Office believes to be accurate and complete to the greatest extent possible, given these identified gaps, the Office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report.", "776" ], [ "Why was the aid frozen? <PERSON> and the Republicans have told no less than 5 versions of why:\n\n1. Senate Republicans said it had been held while the White House assessed whether the newly elected Ukrainian President <PERSON> was aligned with the US and NATO or with Russia.\n2. <PERSON> said <PERSON> wanted the money held because he had “concerns” about the aid’s necessity. \n3. The State Department and Pentagon were instructed to inform members of Congress with questions about the delay that the money was coming but that its disbursement had been held up by “interagency process.” \n4. <PERSON> said it was to ensure that the country’s new government was doing everything possible to root out corruption. \n5. Then <PERSON> said it was to push other European countries into contributing to foreign aid. \n\nWhen your reasons shift like this, then it's pretty clear NONE of them are the actual truth.", "755" ], [ "<PERSON> holds no position in the US government, has taken no oath to our country, and yet he has been in communication with Ukraine for over a year now. On whose behalf? On behalf of our country? But he doesn't represent our country. He was neither elected nor appointed. He has no security clearance. He has no role in our government OTHER THAN he is <PERSON>'s PERSONAL attorney.\n\nTHAT is the key here. These conversations were not had between peers or ambassadors. <PERSON> was pushing for info to help <PERSON>.\n\nAnd let's not forget that by <PERSON> having attorneys do this, he can hide behind both executive and attorney-client privilege.", "755" ], [ "<PERSON>:\n\npacked the Supreme Court\n\nexerts executive privilege for conversations with people who have no part in our administration\n\ncommanded administration officials to ignore subpoenas\n\nsends his personal attorney to negotiate with foreign leaders\n\ndeclares a national emergency to take money lawfully allocated by congress for one purposes to use it for another\n\nput both his daughter and son-in-law in positions within his administration for which they were unqualified and could not obtain the necessary security clearance\n\ntook the side of <PERSON> over our intelligence community\n\nhas undermined freedom of the press\n\ntweets out policy changes with zero review, consultation, or review of their legality\n\ngives way national secrets that jeopardized years of work inside foreign countries and caused our insiders to have to flee for their own safety\n\nShould I go on?", "693" ], [ "<PERSON> holds no position in the US government, has taken no oath to our country, and yet he has been in communication with Ukraine for over a year now. On whose behalf? On behalf of our country? But he doesn't represent our country. He was neither elected nor appointed. He has no security clearance. He has no role in our government OTHER THAN he is <PERSON>'s PERSONAL attorney (which allows him to hide behind attorney-client privilege.)\n\nSince <PERSON> has no official role, his conversations with officials in Ukraine were not peer to peer in any way. He can't represent our country nor our interests. Those conversations had one purpose: <PERSON> was to pressure Ukraine for info on behalf of and to help <PERSON>.", "755" ], [ "I have no doubt that the <PERSON> investigation would have gone very differently had executive privilege not been claimed on every communication between <PERSON> and <PERSON>. \n\nThe end of <PERSON>’s Executive summary of Part 1:\n\nThe investigation did not always yield admissible information or testimony, or a complete picture of the activities undertaken by subjects of the investigation. Some individuals invoked their Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination and were not, in the Office's judgment, appropriate candidates for grants of immunity. The Office limited its pursuit of other witnesses and information—such as information known to attorneys or individuals claiming to be members of the media—in light of internal Department of Justice policies. See, e.g., Justice Manual §§ 9-13.400, 13.410. Some of the information obtained via court process, moreover, was presumptively covered by legal privilege and was screened from investigators by a filter (or \"taint\") team. Even when individuals testified or agreed to be interviewed, they sometimes provided information that was false or incomplete, leading to some of the false-statements charges described above. And the Office faced practical limits on its ability to access relevant evidence as well-numerous witnesses and subjects lived abroad, and documents were held outside the United States.\n\nFurther, the Office learned that some of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated—including some associated with the Trump Campaign—deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long-term retention of data or communications records. In such cases, the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with other known facts.\n\nAccordingly, while this report embodies factual and legal determinations that the Office believes to be accurate and complete to the greatest extent possible, given these identified gaps, the Office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report.", "776" ], [ "He authorized the release of the conversation because he simply thought, “this guy was so nice to me! It was a lovely conversation! What could be wrong here?!”\n\nNever mind the fact he unilaterally held up nearly $400 million in aid that was earmarked by congress and mandated by statute to be delivered to Ukraine. He doesn’t understand that he can’t just do what the hell he wants to “make a deal” because that deal was already made. And it’s not his fucking money anyway!! He just doesn’t understand that at all.", "755" ] ]
415
[ 13147, 10077, 22504, 9213, 11790, 18509, 13904, 11627, 11052, 3192, 17601, 23629, 5754, 16937, 21693, 12912, 12136, 21375, 1699, 13851, 5248, 20316, 2633, 4670, 9051, 23820, 633, 4, 3197, 21674, 18828, 15734, 2199, 7440, 598, 24755, 16584, 22419, 13630, 18059, 1878, 1016, 3748, 11875, 1986, 3591, 15092, 20165, 14931, 18477, 18511, 22899, 16782, 10483, 23806, 2737, 13046, 25066, 22393, 15091, 24284, 4224, 2062, 25124, 4910, 16556, 25134, 13023, 1428, 5075, 19401, 25312, 17246, 12001, 16458, 9841, 8734, 17513, 16531, 2323, 19698, 22046, 19553, 18914, 24211, 8627, 5370, 17256, 2548, 7402, 4609, 22587, 19425, 5490, 17680, 21233, 13063, 6277, 24771, 22050, 18781, 11317, 83, 12517, 22932, 3840, 5828, 15823, 10416, 2470, 23571, 13454, 18826, 7615, 7543, 7909, 8838, 7622, 20451, 19444, 13573, 10082, 10797, 14067, 14229, 12785, 11141, 6747, 14213, 17672, 5500, 19043, 1160, 12119, 12964, 14948, 1729, 11837, 19165, 12894, 6178, 464, 14493, 12691, 11133, 25404, 15260, 20991, 8493, 25386, 13738, 16540, 23826, 8109, 23941, 8737, 4538, 17797, 14273, 5288, 14598, 130, 5630, 12038, 19559, 7946, 3020, 16560, 2351, 17935, 1778, 2688, 5632, 21281, 15238, 7283, 13377, 18390, 12409, 8157, 21460, 3256, 22321, 5073, 3828, 9690, 14508, 24866, 14313, 6731, 22129, 22392, 7537, 4132, 2778, 2148, 5952, 20440, 19580, 15346, 24795, 23626, 8017, 6833, 19114, 23250, 15889, 163, 6310, 25195, 6877, 12984, 18243, 22142, 6082, 504, 19691, 16960, 6503, 18525, 17984, 5445, 6234, 1558, 1128, 21535, 14379, 2138, 20823, 13398, 6432, 21321, 19789, 10977, 22526, 13698, 5018, 20562, 9544, 22363, 3781, 13750, 8534, 8520, 17584, 14315, 7655, 5572, 14275, 332, 18651, 19909, 13325, 22334, 1670, 14246, 13796, 3501, 24052, 12382, 10327, 18831, 13519, 9419, 15409, 18984, 7495, 25508, 9356, 18569, 10510, 4163, 18061, 14341, 5249, 21866, 14866, 19223, 16073, 12388, 22086, 11617, 132, 16294, 20186, 2177, 6850, 1990, 6157, 4056, 9110, 14937, 20000, 22476, 11073, 5142, 2983, 14653, 8426, 8694, 20837, 20132, 24607, 16842, 6551, 2960, 13612, 20125, 19639, 22567, 14675, 2787, 18400, 24264, 21712, 10402, 14701, 21099, 8851, 3269, 7494, 5932, 19807, 14788, 7685, 21648, 11822, 23188, 21802, 9578, 22494, 12078, 7613, 14448, 9287, 494, 3850, 8715, 79, 11898, 5989, 12998, 22075, 3093, 14720, 21317, 1496, 7654, 13238, 19412, 15972, 13416, 6381, 11302, 10607, 217, 24314, 1458, 15642, 5045, 3280, 2314, 21698, 6037, 15931, 10922, 12296, 8467, 14373, 8363, 1192, 14868, 6811, 22445, 19976, 461, 15911, 20869, 17017, 23977, 3720, 20970, 6026, 22156, 8761, 11775, 4018, 116, 18393, 10804, 23398, 9367, 9739, 15420, 10640, 1560, 11372, 20124, 25322, 10525, 18562, 1462, 20725, 22411, 19572, 16447, 6317, 4515, 6522, 18031, 10529, 2294, 20353, 21229, 5966, 23052, 2700, 3804, 14139, 16225, 4529, 12744, 16286, 15885, 1884, 23511, 20553, 14949, 24870, 21033, 1725, 16320, 11463, 1994, 7677, 10113, 7736, 17469, 2107, 12308, 5555, 20977, 17556, 22159, 20845, 19064, 19455, 13050, 14799, 13778, 20256, 8937, 11398, 10575, 13916, 3532, 1351, 2583, 3716, 12877, 20887, 16189, 11356, 5900, 16258, 12920, 22243, 13308, 3581, 18738, 23579, 5946, 16047, 17553, 11721, 24880, 19724, 24734, 10000, 13060, 17519, 1535, 15516, 20637, 12294, 2640, 2756, 12413, 23187, 12796, 16744, 12999, 23358, 5968, 13997, 22886, 22984, 16411, 14791 ]
reddit_dump_0o_hm
[ [ "You need to support your son and frankly your husband needs to grow the fuck up.\n\nHe had a child and part of that is the commitment to love and support that person. You don’t throw your toys out the pram because they don’t fit the idea of what you want or share your lifestyle choices.\n\nLots of people will talk about patience and giving him time etc, but frankly having grown up with a father who from the sound of it rather resembles your husband, I can tell you all the patience in the world won’t work. And now I have no relationship with him as why would I want to.\n\nSo it’s down to him, entirely, if he wants that to be the case for him and his son or if he wants to get over himself and love his son for who he is.", "732" ], [ "Having come from a similar home with a dominating father my mum has never understood that she was enabling him and as the other adult it was up to her to confront him and stop it happening.\n\nI find it hard to blame her though as she wanted to avoid conflict at all costs and so was in constant deescalation mode.\n\nIt’s much safer for everyone to confront a crying child than enrage someone who starts shouting and screaming at everyone. So I do feel for the lady and I think it’s worth bearing in mind the context it may be happening in.\n\nAlso she is trying to do the right thing now and it sounds like she has a lot of love for her son.", "900" ], [ "People have a weird understanding of what a job description is or means. You can absolutely give people work and responsibilities outside of their job description as long as it can reasonably be seen to fit under their title (which is a broad scope) and is not being done in a malicious way. The intent is important.\n\nI’ve had to explain this to employees on more than one occasion that if it needs doing and you are best placed in the business to do it, then I will assign it to you.\n\nAs a small business you couldn’t operate without flexibility and if the business can’t operate then no one has a job. So if it is best for the business and reasonable to do so, you’ll be asked to do it.", "641" ], [ "Some used dealers are great, others are shite. Due to the increasing forecourt fees only the really well established guys are still around so the amount of crappy ones has diminished a lot in recent years.\n\nDealership is often a better route for lots of people as you can get a warranty and if you don’t what your doing or not mechanically minded this might be the best route for you.\n\nI buy private usually because I have a bit of experience and know what to look for. I wouldn’t advise that route for everyone. And now I’m planning a more expensive purchase I’m specifically looking at dealership over private.\n\nNo offensive but your advise sounds a lot like you haven’t got much experience in the matter. If you had you’d know there is no one size fits all approach and neither are outright better or worse, it’s very much dependant on the circumstances.", "565" ], [ "Well it depends as what you define as paying g a premium to be. If you want to pay less buy private but if you want more legal protections and a warranty, which a reputable dealer will absolutely honour, then pay the extra for a dealership.\n\nPeople also don’t want to sell their cars themselves and dealers offer a trade in. You get maybe 2/3 of what you would selling privately but people are OK with that for the convenience.\n\nYes some dealers end up in court over warranties, but they are the vast minority of instances which you are representing as the norm.\n\nBuying private has a lot more risk and not everyone wants to spend time learning about cars. They want to pay the money and drive away. That’s how society works, we don’t all have to be plumbers or electricians or doctors. We employ other people’s expertise.", "565" ], [ "Yeah. Except that’s total bollocks and this has been an issue for fucking years. Just because you’re ignorant of it, surprise surprise, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.\n\nBeing gay isn’t a choice or preference. Your comparison is like saying not chewing a mouthful of bees is a preference. Like yeah you have a mouth and bees fit in it so it’s anatomically possible.\n\nAnd yeah, having sex with someone against your sexuality is as psychologically damaging as a mouthful of bees may well be physically.\n\nIf you don’t think that’s true why don’t you show everyone that being straight is just your preference and have sex with a couple of guys.", "640" ], [ "Preference literally means the selection of something or ability to chose.\n\nGay people don’t choose to be gay. It’s not like people are picking their sexuality as what they prefer. It’s innate.\n\nEdit : If you’re downvoting this I guess the dictionary is wrong then...\n\nDefinition of preference\n\na : the act of preferring : the state of being preferred\n\nb : the power or opportunity of choosing\n\n_URL_0_", "640" ], [ "I’d eat the fish pie ASAP and the chicken I would cook then freeze. You can then use it in curries or stews or whatever straight out the freezer.\n\nFreezing stuff that’s about to go off is a bad idea as either you have to defrost it which may well send it over the edge or it’s really easily to undercook the middle of meat if you’re cooking from frozen.", "967" ], [ "I’m seriously considering getting a pair of rabbits and keeping them indoors. I hear they chew pretty much anything which I’m not too worried about as I can easily tidy cables etc out the way. But I’m wondering about stopping them from going upstairs? Will they go up the stairs of their own volition meaning I’ll need a stair gate to stop them.", "173" ], [ "This broke my brain for ages until I realised it’s just hanging off the centre chain.\n\nThe reason it looks impossible is the point of suspension has just been moved to below the table rather than where you expect it, above the table.\n\nThe outer chains are just there to stop it tipping over.\n\nIt’s totally baffling until it clicks but when it does it’s so much less impressive!", "742" ], [ "Ignore the outer chains for a moment. Just look at the centre chain. You can see it’s just suspended from the centre chain to a stand on the ground. So instead of suspending it from above they have moved the suspension point to below. That’s what makes it look so impossible.\n\nSo that carries the weight of the table and all the side chains do is stop it tipping over as if they are taught each side then it cannot tip in either direction.", "473" ], [ "Yeah but the repairman will know what appliances he fixes.\n\nIf he starts seeing lots more new Samsung’s over any other brand then he can reasonably assume that Samsung have dropped in reliability to below that of other brands.\n\nIt may also be the case they have suddenly increased in popularity, but I would have thought someone who specialises in the repair of appliances would have a feel for the market.\n\nPeople are able to think for themselves and draw conclusions over than ‘fridge broken, Samsung bad’.", "923" ], [ "Thanks for the link, that’s closer to what I am looking for.\n\nAnd no, forecasts are not just estimates. They are taking existing data and using it to project out into the future. It should follow a mathematical model.\n\nWhat I’m interested in is how they have achieved this, the pdf doesn’t go into detail about how they weight the different values and have come to this conclusion.\n\nDo they provide any back testing or can we see past estimates they have made against what actually happened?", "185" ], [ "Your brain is a physical thing. Memories are stored in some form of physical capacity, be it a particular chemical composition or pattern of synapses. If the healing factor works to rebuild the brain exactly as it was at the point of destruction then it would rebuild those memories.\n\nHealing factors do differentiate between natural and unnatural cell and body changes. For example wolverines hair still grows if he were to shave it, it comes back. So it makes sense memories are allowed to form without the brain being ‘healed’ back to its original state.\n\nIt’s only when unnaturally altered does the healing factor kick in. I expect ageing is slowed because the healing factor ensures perfect copies of cells are made rather than the slightly degraded ones which cause us to grow older.", "147" ], [ "This is not offensive to me, I don't think he crossed 'the' line at all. But he clearly crossed 'your' line.\n\nIt wasn't offensive by design and nor was it said with ill intention. He's apologised as well. At this point what more do you want from them? I feel like your actions are bordering into unfair by freezing them out. Effectively punishing them by making them feel worse about it. It's not exactly how friends should treat each other, even if they have made a mistake.\n\nYou're allowed to be offended, but if it wasn't said with the intention of being offensive you say 'hey I found that offensive' and explain why, they say 'sorry' then that's the matter closed. If it happens again then it's different, but you have to accept that different people have different types of humour and many people wouldn't be offended by this and he was reasonable to assume you wouldn't be either.\n\nIf you want to carry on being friends you need to act like one, be forgiving and help them understand and improve.", "219" ], [ "This feels like ultimately a catch 22 situation. Trans women are on grindr for a reason, I would assume as it's lgbt friendly.\n\nSo guys who like trans women go on there and say they are only interested in women. Trans women I assume don't have a problem with this as they are on grindr and I would assume like men who like women. As they are on Grindr which is specifically for the LGBT community then therefor it is unlikely those men will be looking for cis women. So the two parties are in a kind of tacit agreement. Trans women are there for men who like women and are also into trans women. Men who like women are on there as they are into trans women as well. All makes sense so far.\n\nBut then people stand on the sidelines and get angry about it and call them chasers and act like they shouldn't be there?\n\nCan someone explain this logic to me or is it just good old fashioned prejudice and shaming part of the community because they don't like it?", "847" ], [ "> People including me are making fun of his style\n\n > the comment actually saying something about his physical appearance has been downvoted the most\n\nYou can't even help but contradict yourself in your own comment, it's clear you're making fun of them because of the way they look. His 'style' is still his appearance, clearly. Don't give me any of this it's fine to bully someone because they 'chose' to look like that bullshit. And no, calling it 'busting his balls' instead of bullying doesn't make it OK either.\n\nTaking someone else's profile to post anonymously and make fun of on the internet is bullying. From the very community that should understand better than most what it means to have their appearance and sexual preference publicly questioned and shamed.\n\nBe better.", "837" ], [ "I don't feel like I am overacting. I am putting myself in this guys place and thinking about how it would feel to find this content.\n\nI was bullied a lot as a kid because of how I looked and my sexuality. Both by peers and my own (adult) family.\n\nThe absolute worst of it was finding out about the stuff that took place behind my back, just like this.\n\nI point it out whenever I see it, I have no time for it. It's not on. Frankly I couldn't give it shit if you call me woke or not. I've been doing it for a lot longer than woke was ever a word and I'll still be doing it a long time after.", "331" ], [ "I'm not inflating every situation. It's your opinion I'm inflating this situation, fine. But to then stretch that into I do in every situation and therefore you have no time for me? Now who's inflating things?\n\nNext, you're inferring all of this...\n\n > I see this post as calling the guy out for his way of thinking. As in \"I'm straight but I'll settle for you guys to help me get sexual gratification and validation. I won't suck your dick or be accommodating because I'm A tOp!\" And proceeds to cover 80% of his face so that he can still call us slurs in public.\n\nYou don't know any of that. You're just making it up to justify your behaviour towards them.", "730" ], [ "Yes there are multiple ways, neither of us has a magic ball that allows us to see inside this guys head or know anything about them. Hence it not being on to publicly shame them based on their appearance and sexual preference. I don't know why this needs pointing out?\n\nI guess in your view it's OK to shame people because they choose to dress in a style you dislike. This entire post is literally titled in a way that does so. All I'm doing is pointing out that we can't pick and choose which people we apply those standards to, we need to include in them people who might look different from how we would choose to dress or do so in a way we dislike as long as it's not overtly offensive by design.\n\nThe only thing a tolerable society cannot tolerate is intolerance. That's what this is, like it or not. It's pointing at someone and saying they shouldn't look or act in that way based on nothing more than your dislike of it.\n\nThe rest of it, your analysis of internalised homophobia, that's pure conjecture. You are projecting an unfounded accusation on someone then justifying your own mistreatment of them based on that. That's not fair either.", "16" ], [ "Controversial as it may be, the death penalty is no longer used in the majority of the developed world with good reason. We seem to forget why when we see what we think is a good reason for it.\n\nThe death penalty is always wrong, even when it might feel like the right thing to do. We cannot pick and choose based on the emotiveness of one crime over the other. The reasons for it being wrong remain so whatever the crime committed.\n\nThis is doubly so when welded by deeply corrupt theocratic governments with highly prejudiced court systems. There is a reason why the Daily Mail, a right wing UK newspaper, would choose to report on this particular crime and punishment and not the countless other number of hangings and court sanctioned murders which take place in Iran, such as those against members of the LGBT community, atheists or those who simply speak up against the government.\n\nThey are seeking to glorify its use, make people more receptive to harsher punishments and worse treatment of criminals. Moving the system here in the UK towards punishment over rehabilitation.\n\nThis is not a story published in a vacuum and it is not done so without bias and agenda.", "178" ], [ "Not sure that’s relevant. It the guy was bisexual then his sexuality wouldn’t be the issue here. If he was being unfaithful then that’s a different matter. Bi guys can have lifelong relationships with people of either sex without any sort of denial.\n\nTo be honest this is the kind of thinking that made my ex jealous when I dressed a certain way if she thought it was ‘too gay’. Which I found really fucking offensive.", "640" ], [ "OK well there was the line and you just sailed across it.\n\nYou’ve come here asking for help, stop and think for a second how it feels to all the people whose community you are happily trashing.\n\nIt’s fine not to like certain things but to be so negative and dismissive of other people’s lifestyle is deeply unfair.\n\n‘Gay culture’ is as diverse as you make it. Gay men are just people, we come in all shapes and sizes and enjoy a broad range of things.\n\nJust be a bit nicer about it, think about how your words might affect others. Just because something isn’t for you doesn’t make it wrong. There is no need to shame others for living a lifestyle you just happen to not want to.", "418" ], [ "> It seems as tho although Bi, it’s not enough for him and the gay side is winning\n\nFYI as someone who is Bi this is as incredibly outdated way of thinking and bordering on offensive.\n\nBeing Bi doesn't mean you have a 'gay side' and a 'straight side' you have one sexuality just like everyone else. Usually that's influenced by the PERSON you are attracted to, not their gender.\n\nIf this guy is lusting after guys it's because he's unhappy with his marriage, wanting other sexual partners is an outcome of that. You've got it completely backwards in your thinking.\n\nYou can be Bi and live very happily with a single partner your whole life. Bi people are not incapable of long term relationships as the 'other side' also needs fulfilling. It's just not a healthy or accurate way of looking at sexuality.", "640" ], [ "Yeah Grindr is a weird place. I have previously got messages from male profiles who have turned out to be Cis women who find it a turn on to pretend to be guys on there and get fucked by bi guys. It's pretty much anything goes to be honest.\n\nI think just like every other community there are many different opinions and some people appear to want to label every 'straight' man attracted to them on grindr a 'chaser'. Which seems a little odd to me. I don't really get the logic in that when those men are saying they view trans women as women and are also attracted to them. Which seems OK to me?\n\nYour explanation makes far more sense to me, there is a difference between those who are attracted to Trans people and those who fetishise them as sexual objects. It's about the distinction between the two.\n\nIt's also worth bearing in mind there are plenty of guys on grindr who enjoy dressing up as women and being fetishised, they do it purely as a sexual activity and are only fem in bed. That's also totally fine, it's distinct from trans people and it's not the same. However there is no such distinction in the 'tribes' categorisation within Grindr. All of these groups appear under the 'trans' tribe.\n\nSo all these different groups are mixed together under one broad label and I think that's also causing issues.", "847" ], [ "No it’s really not, this is the ‘<PERSON> was a vegetarian’ argument. It’s just total bollocks. You can’t just say ‘well this sounds like X and X was bad so this means this is bad’.\n\nIt’s just a non starter. Don’t make comparisons to what it ‘sounds’ like. It’s not needed, let’s just talk about what it is.", "909" ], [ "Where did services come into this?\n\nI’ve reiterated the same point so many times I really can’t be bothered to type it out on mobile again. Just go back and read my first comment.\n\nI think it says a lot that no one can actually respond to the points I made. Every single comment sidesteps them. Go and look at them all.\n\nIt’s like people can’t actually admit that yes this is a complex and difficult issue that needs nuance so instead they sort of just dance around it to make there morally absolute point instead.", "809" ], [ "This is my original comment:\n\n > Women should feel safe and part of that for some women is having a women only environment. If like OP is saying they present male and are also physically male, that may in itself mean that women no longer feel safe in certain spaces with them.\n\n > This isn’t a case of what’s ‘fair’ or how things should or shouldn’t be. But instead is just how it currently is. We have to respect that and women’s feelings about these spaces and not simply ride roughshod over them with out morality.\n\n > It’s not an easy one to accept, but the women who feel uncomfortable having op in their space, well we need to respect that. We don’t get to say OPs need is greater than theirs.\n\nYes, you can read that 'she should have less access to spaces because of the way she looks' but clearly that's a gross mischaracterisation of the point I am trying to make.\n\nAt the same time you're saying we need to consider how TERFs use this argument whilst simultaneously saying that that means we shouldn't discuss it. That's a fucking odd point to make. Because TERFs have capitalised on this issue we shouldn't address it?", "497" ], [ "> So what are you saying? Because right now it really comes across as you trying to say that things behind her control make her \"male\".\n\nThere's not much I can do if your ability to read and interpret information is that poor.\n\n > I'm saying that be careful with that rhetoric, because your argument seems to flip flop between comments, and that may not be intentional on your part\n\nShow me any example of this. I have made the same point in each comment and not deviated in any way.\n\n > TERF arguments are worth exploring, but not for the reason you're thinking. The intent behind those arguments should be analyzed so that well-meaning people aren't sucked into those spaces or pushed out of trans-positive ones and into TERF ones for repeating them with no context of the underlying, toxic nature.\n\n...or they should be explored because as they rely on leveraging real problems and fears. If we deal with those then they can no longer be used in this way.\n\nAlso it's not like there's no context here. There is shit tons, so your whole point seems a little silly. Also why does it matter so much if you are agreeing it's worth discussing? Just feels like an attempt at point scoring that has fallen a little flat.", "181" ], [ "OK, I don't really have an answer to when you just take my comment and infer whatever bullshit you want into it's perceived meaning.\n\nI mean hey, maybe I'm really saying that we're all lizard people and the world is a spoon.\n\nReally what's the point in even trying to discuss something when someone does this? It's just silly.\n\nBy the way, I interpret your comment as meaning that you agree with everything I said and that I completely right. So thank you :)", "837" ], [ "> The crux of the matter that you keep dancing around is whether women’s feelings of unsafeness that stem from bigotry deserve to be respected.\n\nNope, no dancing around this at all. To be really absolutely clear we sometimes need to make additional considerations for vulnerable people. Those people are not acting out of hatred, there is no bigotry involved, they are instead acting out of fear born of their own personal experience.\n\nI hope that clears up that point for you. Anything else you think I am dancing around then please do just ask.\n\n > Cis women may genuinely feel unsafe around trans women. But if that feeling stems from the fact that those women are trans, then it absolutely doesn’t deserve to be respected or accommodated.\n\nBingo.\n\n'But'. So what happens when that feeling unsafe DOES NOT stem from being trans but from them being genetically male and looking so? What do you do then? Because it sounds a lot like you are agreement with me.\n\n > It’s the same way that many white people feel unsafe around black people because they’re black. That’s a shitty stance and it doesn’t deserve to be respected.\n\nNo. It's not. It would be the same as having a support group for white victims of violent crime committed by black people (don't blame me for how distasteful this sounds, you're the one who has weirdly dragged race into it and constructed this rather awkward premise) and then insist that a black person who identifies as white should be able to join that group. Even when for some members of that group even being alone in a room with a black person is enough to trigger a severe episode of PTSD.\n\nAs I said, it's a pretty distasteful analogy, but you are the one so determined to drag race into it.", "847" ], [ "> Bigotry doesn’t require hatred and can be borne out of personal experience.\n\nYes it can. But you do realise this doesn't deal with or address my point in any way whatsoever. The sky is blue.\n\n > Conflating being transgender - a real, observed phenomenon - with being transracial - not, to say the least - is gross, but unsurprising from a TERF.\n\nYou set up the construct yourself!!! Which I took great pains to point out was somewhat distasteful. How fucking dare you then turn that round on me and say that it's my doing.\n\nFrankly fuck you. I'm done with this bad faith rhetoric.\n\n'oh what if it was race instead of gender'\n\nI provide example whilst stating how distasteful that is\n\n'oh you're disgusting what a terf'\n\nYou know what, fuck you. You're flat out acting in bad faith and I'm done with talking to you.", "847" ], [ "But it’s not though is it. Segregation is the unnecessary separation of people and restriction of the their freedoms based on arbitrary values. That’s like calling a disabled only access to a building ‘segregation’. It’s utterly helpful, irrelevant and used in bad faith only to evoke connotations of racial segregation.\n\nYou are continually mischaracterising my point and then arguing against that mischaracterisation rather than my actual point.\n\nAs you seem unable to respond on the actual point at hand we’re not going to get anywhere.\n\nEvery comment I make you respond by drawing a false parallel thatI then reject, reiterate my point, then you respond by drawing another false parallel.\n\nStop this ‘it’s like X bad thing and so therefore as X is bad it’s also bad’ bullshit and deal with the point at hand. You continually evade any attempt to deal with the bulk of the issue in this way and it’s utterly pointless going round in circles debunking your bullshit.", "16" ], [ "No. You’re drawing the parallel with race not me.\n\nThis is the most blatant example of what you keep doing. Represent my argument as something it is not, then argue against that misrepresentation.\n\nI honestly think at this point you are either incapable of understanding the matter at hand or you genuinely don’t care about it.\n\nThe own thing that you care about is getting to ‘own’ a terf. It really doesn’t matter to you I’m not a terf you’ll just repeatedly say I am. And as you can’t actually engage with my point because I’m guess it’s just too complex for you to grasp, you instead over simplify it as something you can engage with and ‘own’ that instead.\n\nIn fact now I’ve typed this out it’s cringingly obvious this is exactly what’s happening. Oh dear!\n\nThis is a pointless conversation as you don’t want to engage and I genuinely think you’re not capable.\n\nWelp.", "248" ], [ "> The NIS informed South Korean officials that those executed include a well-known money changer in Pyongyang. <PERSON> reportedly blamed the person for North Korea's falling exchange rate. \n\n > The other is a key official who in August was found to be in violation of restrictions placed on goods coming from outside the country amid the pandemic.\n\n\nTo be honest looking at my own governments disastrous and corrupt response I think a few executions wouldn’t go amiss here.", "959" ], [ "> So uhhhhh when you're done excluding all of the trans women from women's rape and domestic abuse support groups and shelters because they don't look enough like \"women\" \n\nExcept I'm not doing that. I think you need to go back and re read my comment. As what I am doing is saying there maybe circumstances where it is not appropriate. We're not dealing in absolutes here. We're dealing with tricky sensitive issues and vulnerable people. So this absolutism is damaging to all parties, that absolutism by the way is very obvious when you look at your response. I'm clearly saying there may be exceptional circumstances and you respond talking about 'all'.\n\nThere is a real disconnect between my point and your response. You completely misinterpret my point and then based on that misinterpretation call me a TERF. It's reductive, but more than that it's completely unhelpful. You gain no understanding of the issue and I just get bored dealing yet another comment which entirely misinterprets the point in the rush to label me a TERF.\n\n > i rreeeeeeaaally like how you juxtapose \"trans women\" against \"women\". It kinda gives the whole TERF game away\n\nI think people are a little confused on this. Not all women are the same. Trans women and cis women are different. Black women and white women are different. Disabled and able bodied women are different. This is not the same as saying that some women are 'less' than other women, but you need to recognise that 'women' is not a homogeneous group that should all be treated the same in all circumstances.", "847" ], [ "I have the small instant pot as it's just me and I fucking LOVE it! I got it about a month ago because of this sub and I have been cooking in it every day! I barely use my stove top any more!\n\nSo what I do is make a lot of dahl based veggie curries. In fact as I work from home I'll often cook one in the morning and just eat it throughout the day!\n\nI use a lot of frozen veg as you get maximum nutrients that way, I just bung a load in and add a portion of lentils, veggie stock cube, curry spice, garam masala, oat milk and of course a couple of chillis.\n\nThen I set it to pressure cook for 5 minutes and get on with my day. It's always delicious, super cheap and really healthy.\n\nIf I need something extra filling I will add a portion of brown rice and increase the cook time to 10 minutes. Yes I am super lazy when making food if I'm working from home! I just bung it all in there and wander off and it works out :)", "967" ], [ "> I read your post. Answer the question: who is going to pay for the support group to be run for me to go to get support for my sexual assault? Answer. The. Question.\n\nWhy? This isn't a conversation about funding support groups. Trying to pin my point to it is frankly a bit silly. Besides that you are still talking in absolutes. As if you would have access to no group rather than as I am saying in certain circumstances certain people may need to be directed to alternatives based on the needs of the existing members.\n\n > Yeah, but you didn't say \"trans women\" and \"cis women\". You said \"trans women\" and \"women\". Kinda gives up the game, yknow. Since I am a woman. A normal, every day, run of the mill woman. Not a new third gender.\n\nIf you're idea of engaging with someone is waiting for them to use the wrong terminology and then jump on that rather than in any way try and engage with the content of what they are saying then you absolutely in the wrong.\n\nI strongly get the sense your only aim here is to 'prove' I am some secret terf / transphobe and will continue to try and misrepresent my comments in order to do so rather than actually engaging with them. That's up to you I guess! I certainly have better things to do with my time that try and misinterpret other peoples comments so I can get mad at them!", "847" ], [ "You do seem to be a fan of these false parallels where you say ‘it’s either THIS thing or THAT thing choose’. Clearly that’s bullshit. As I keep saying you seem to consistently fall back on this sort of absolutism and refuse to even engage with the notion that in some circumstances some nuance may need to be applied.\n\nI don’t think it’s really possible to engage with you in good faith on this topic as you just flat out refuse to actually talk about the issue and rather every single time immediately begin your response with these false parallels.\n\nI won’t be responding to you other comments either as you are just spamming the thread with the same technique. It doesn’t achieve anything and as much as I enjoy talking to people with differing viewpoints to my own, there is nothing to be gained from someone who acts like yourself in these circumstances.", "248" ], [ "Yeah as soon as I saw it I thought bullshit on the mobile phone claim. It’s high power, small surface area, heat sensitive and spends most its time in your pocket.\n\nIt’s a pretty piss poor candidate for solar and not sure why the article would want to link the two, apart from sheer click bait.", "927" ], [ "Ah that’s annoying. My insurance did my windscreen via auto glass for £100 excess up front and that was it. I wouldn’t have driven round with it broken for 6 months had I realised how cheap and easy it was.\n\nI’ve not done a side window myself but I imagine getting the door card off without scuffing anything or breaking any of the plastic clips is going to be the hardest part.\n\nI’m no expert but I’d probably give the window motor and mechanism a good spray with some silicon based lube whilst you’re in there.", "400" ], [ "Hey dude, so I have just bought my kid his first laptop for Christmas. I spent about ~£250 on a chromebook and it’s a great little machine.\n\nFrom your other comments she’s just going to be using the web, zoom etc and for your budget a chromebook is a no brainier. They are absolutely fantastic little machines with battery life in the 10 hour range.\n\nI have a MacBook Pro from work and I was lucky enough to be given a chromebook in a promotion a couple of years ago and it’s been my travel and home browsing device ever since I got it. It’s fantastic and although my one is just a base model it’s been fine to work on in a pinch as well. So even in comparison to my work machine, it still performs well.\n\nFor your budget something like this is a great option...\n\n_URL_0_\n\nThen just get a cheap external drive :\n\n_URL_1_\n\nIf you get a laptop case she’ll be able to fit the laptop and drive in there so it won’t be extra hassle to carry round.\n\nIf you are fixed on getting a windows laptop with an integrated drive you’ll probably have to either chance an eBay Chinese special or go second hand.", "127" ], [ "HP are a massive brand, one hp laptop can be awful and another fantastic. I had a look at the listing for yours and it looks pretty solid.\n\nI take it’s running windows? 4gb ram on windows 10 ‘should’ run fine, my old media pc is on windows 10 with only 3 gb of ram and a worse processor and can handle zoom, but it’s at its limit.\n\nI strongly suspect there is a lot of bloatware and background stuff running which is killing performance on your laptop.\n\nYou can either spend some time clearing out all the crap on there and what is running in the background, anti virus is often a culprit so have a look at what’s on there and how it’s scheduled, as well as anything else you don’t strictly need. Or look at installing Linux on it.\n\nPersonally I would probably try and clear it out and get it running properly on windows first, then fall back on putting Ubuntu on it if not.", "127" ], [ "Have you looked at what is it that’s running and eating up the cpu?\n\nIt may well be chrome at fault, running that with more than a handful of tabs can be surprisingly intensive.\n\nYou should be able to get it running properly and handle zoom without issue. It’s got the hardware. As I said before, if you really run out of options shoving Ubuntu or even xubuntu on it might be a good idea.", "545" ], [ "Ouch, I’m wincing at the thought. Maybe this guy has some weird pain fetish as it’s pretty well know shampoo is really painful if it gets in your ass. Stings like fuck.\n\nIf it was the smell I’m not sure why he wouldn’t just ask you to wash your hair in it for him then he can smell it whilst fucking you.", "670" ], [ "There are multiple vaccines working with different methodologies. A new variant so different none of the vaccines work on it but also still infectious and lethal, I think the odds are very low.\n\nCovid and Coronaviruses are going to be with us for a long time yet. But just like h1n1 we’ll get it under control and learn to live with it.\n\nSociety will find an acceptable balance between deaths and disruption and life will go on.", "235" ], [ "Vote leave campaign was about immigration. It was sold on that and people voted on that issue.\n\nLet’s not start pretending it was about anything different.\n\nThat’s why they didn’t think about the impact on trade, that was very obviously going to be. People voted against their own interests across sectors because they didn’t care, they just wanted less immigrants.\n\nI personally don’t blame a lot of people for this, I don’t think they are racist to be concerned about immigration. We’re a densely populated country with serious problems with our public services.\n\nHowever I do blame people for ignoring all the obvious evidence and voting to leave at any cost. Because it was never going to achieve what they thought it would, it was always going to be limited upside and massive downside.", "845" ], [ "Wow, talk about a logical fallacy.\n\nNo, not buying this breed is not letting the dogs live an awful life. It’s stopping the perpetuation of the breed. It’s cruel.\n\nYour viewpoint is rather twisted. You can both home existing dogs whilst the general public stop buying them.\n\nThe reality is it’s not going to happen overnight. Demand for the breed will fade and breeders will react by choosing other breeds.\n\nThere is no reason to support a cruel practice like breeds which have so many health problems.", "911" ], [ "You’re the one who wants to continue a breed that is a obviously cruel because, well I’m assuming because it looks cute? I’m not really sure what the argument here is.\n\nYou’re pathetic whatever it is. People like you are the reason why we have so much animal cruelty in the world. You don’t give a flying fuck as long as you can have your latest accessory.", "766" ], [ "If people keep buying them breeders will keep breeding them.\n\nDissuading people to buy them will slowly reduce demand, it’s not going to just stop everyone overnight, with reduced demand breeders will move on to other breeds.\n\nYou’re creating a completely false idea that everyone will stop buying them at once and so therefore existing unsold puppies would not be purchased. That’s utter bullshit.", "911" ], [ "You’re just talking bullshit now. I’m saying people shouldn’t buy them and dissuading them from doing so will reduce demand. You’re going off into euthanising them and all other kinds of insane.\n\nalso don’t call people retarded. That’s a disgusting word and frankly punching down on societies most vulnerable to make a cheap insult is pathetic.", "98" ], [ "It’s just boring. I tried watching the first episode but got bored and ended up skimming through the last half. Same with the second episode as well. I gave up after that.\n\nI don’t like watching cheesy American canned laughter sit coms and watching a pastiche of them isn’t any more appealing.\n\nIt’s too similar to the source material which I have no interest in.", "522" ], [ "What is it with drunk twats on the underground? Usually with three day old stubble, bald, middle aged and wearing their white shirt straight from the office. This may be me projecting though!\n\nAnyway, sorry you had to go through that. They are the loud exception. Fuck that guy. Have you reported it? It is an offence and they should be prosecuted for it. Easier said than done obviously.", "145" ], [ "I really don’t get what point you’re trying to make. Are you saying we should ignore that the sad twats who go round behaving like this are only doing so as they’re angry little people lashing out at the lack of control they have other their own lives?\n\nShould we just be ignoring this? Not sure what flames I’m fanning either? The racists are bad flames?", "272" ], [ "I’m genuinely stunned this is getting upvoted. What bizarre nonsense is this?\n\nWe can both understand why people are utter bags of shite as well as despising them for it. The two are not mutually exclusive.\n\nI’m going to carry on hating racist, bigoted pieces of shit thanks. Maybe next time you’re getting the shit kicked out of you by one you won’t have quite the same attitude.\n\nBut no actually you never will because your ‘tolerance’ reeks of the privilege of never being being at the receiving end of these scum bags.\n\nOh well excuse me while I wipe my blood off your boot kind sir, for I understand you are only attempting to deny my very right to exist because you are angry with your socio economic status and so fucking thick you think me living an alternative lifestyle to yourself is somehow at fault. Well excuse me, I do apologise.\n\nHonestly you can fuck right off.", "16" ], [ "Who says I'm not for educating them? But I'm not going to fucking like them. I'm not at any point trying to make an argument for how to 'cure' them. At no point have I posited anything like that. I've stated why they behave like that and reinforced it's not an excuse.\n\nEveryone is responding like I'm saying I think that calling them names will somehow fix the issue. Of course it won't. Doesn't mean they don't deserve to be called out for being the utter cunts that they are. And I'll happily keep doing that all day long cheers.\n\nI'll leave the holding their hands and making them feel good about taking out how pathetic their lives our on those more vulnerable than themselves to people like yourself.", "331" ], [ "Yeah, like I remember being in this bank and these people were just quietly robbing it. No one was getting hurt and they were all just going about their business until the police arrived that is! It was all really quiet until then, but as soon as they did fights broke out and people were running around all over the place!\n\nI mean if the police just let them get on with it, none of those bank robbers would have made a fuss at all.\n\nWhy can't the police just let them get on with it?", "695" ], [ "I was! :) I'll dig out the comment if you like. I mean I got downvoted to fuck, but they went there against the wishes of the family, broke the law then got upset when being at a protest police treated them like protesters.\n\nSorry lady, being <PERSON> from Clapham doesn't mean the police give a flying fuck and yeah they will happily drag you off into the van as it's a fucking protest you muppet.", "669" ], [ "Ah yeah you see once you go beyond white to orange in America you go from less likely to be imprisoned to impossible. Not many people realise but that’s actually the key to <PERSON> unimprisonability. Much like a peacocks feathers it’s not just there for show but serves a distinct societal purpose.\n\nThe good news is that <PERSON> will not be here in 2024 to be re-elected. He will soon be recalled by the deep state and placed into a storage facility in the Nevada mountains until it’s time for him to be reskinned and run again as a new candidate. If <PERSON> goes on a long holiday before returning to an inexplicable rise in popularity we’ll all know why.", "140" ], [ "Sorry, you're going to have to explain this one.\n\nWhat has the murder of <PERSON> got to do with human rights exactly? I mean I'm pretty sure we were all down with the right not to be murdered already. So guessing it's not that.\n\nSo I'm assuming you're talking about the protest / vigil which happened? So what you mean is it took the police handling a protest with a load of middle class white women like any other protest for this country to recognise what exactly... because to me this looks a lot like privilege rather than human rights to me.\n\nI don't see the papers complaining about the policing of the lockdown protest or the head of the met making an apology for it. In fact I don't see anyone giving much of a flying fuck about the police of legitimate protests NOT held during a pandemic. Until suddenly it involves a lot a young white women and then all of sudden it's on the cover of the daily mail.\n\n<PERSON> has got fuck all to do with the right to protest. It's a an utter shame for her family the way her name is now been used. The manipulation of tragedy is something the press love to do and the papers that want the lockdown eased so their wealthy owners can go back to making money are using it to their full advantage.\n\nYet I'm no doubt the one you think is the 'sheep' for thinking lockdown is a good idea. All I'll say on that is there is a reason why the scientists are saying one thing and yet certain papers are pushing in the other direction.", "281" ], [ "Don’t forget it’s *child* slave labour as well.\n\nBut also excellent maths work :) I did actually look for profit originally but couldn’t find it published for last year. Maybe something to do with the whole we can’t afford not to use slaves thing.\n\nI mean personally I’m on the whole, if we can’t make chocolate without using child slaves maybe we should just make chocolate side!", "231" ], [ "The thing is, people just don’t care. As long as they can have their products that they like. I mean it’s not like we are talking about something anyone even needs. It’s a pure luxury good and people still don’t care.\n\nIf we can’t have it without enslaving children in order to get it, we shouldn’t have it. That applies to even the basics like electricity or running water. But chocolate, fucking chocolate? And people still don’t give a shit. I honestly just don’t get it.", "618" ], [ "I did my sons hair the other day. I have never cut hair since I was about 6 and took a chunk out my fringe. Which my parents still fucking talk about. I mean I think my kid cut his hair at some point, but I’d forgotten about it a week later. Why do my parents think this sort of stuff is so fucking important? Anyway, I did my kids, clippers and all.\n\nHe currently looks a lot like <PERSON> in the first series.", "90" ] ]
223
[ 21388, 5139, 467, 15545, 5792, 4647, 1832, 11339, 14215, 6108, 18982, 21295, 10548, 8872, 14689, 19821, 5590, 19692, 11603, 1009, 17977, 2756, 15339, 4377, 8286, 7108, 16267, 14162, 12465, 17791, 20483, 12154, 17453, 10963, 5374, 15478, 24230, 562, 3942, 19200, 7393, 5478, 16503, 24386, 17005, 13407, 7970, 19127, 7358, 6675, 21129, 16433, 11973, 22401, 605, 17199, 8243, 5144, 2487, 18904, 13081, 773, 16802, 18005, 6429, 5472, 1819, 21398, 24055, 9893, 18852, 1452, 3537, 19609, 3891, 20613, 13413, 17258, 5105, 19657, 1185, 10780, 2029, 4058, 11127, 11351, 16860, 10572, 23172, 1217, 17213, 24296, 23306, 10601, 4838, 24056, 1708, 8678, 10859, 4782, 4540, 1461, 23554, 7213, 5462, 2022, 19173, 7463, 7838, 19242, 22268, 593, 3212, 19451, 3478, 6360, 8390, 17720, 20166, 6569, 17255, 15102, 15324, 11206, 11813, 19551, 574, 20800, 9112, 3999, 18728, 25019, 12443, 1208, 19517, 1240, 5693, 1288, 3209, 224, 1030, 24352, 17259, 7980, 20463, 16629, 11913, 450, 6087, 17588, 1153, 7017, 18865, 4915, 12013, 8910, 7407, 6010, 22157, 22277, 25125, 1931, 2718, 4681, 3389, 8679, 23284, 21146, 16673, 7464, 7307, 37, 18358, 13396, 15673, 2239, 8213, 9864, 15713, 388, 3335, 728, 21195, 25468, 25185, 9962, 23907, 9492, 3131, 25200, 15525, 17485, 7436, 2599, 11099, 19462, 24510, 21908, 15046, 22052, 10023, 835, 8512, 10363, 12863, 22516, 24978, 2263, 15789, 10881, 7858, 2493, 16107, 4721, 9889, 11815, 13787, 12070, 3018, 18626, 21153, 17874, 6535, 22449, 21307, 5859, 20114, 8116, 5295, 12165, 25342, 13118, 23827, 21938, 8110, 6141, 8777, 1527, 17372, 1250, 5651, 5412, 13498, 7719, 18235, 11800, 3534, 2942, 19649, 20740, 5719, 6787, 24787, 6657, 21872, 12561, 15109, 13199, 5430, 21256, 16647, 7671, 2131, 1648, 10384, 18854, 15210, 2018, 23031, 5919, 2378, 12811, 13873, 15859, 15540, 8581, 7331, 6956, 23076, 3062, 18951, 10593, 8247, 17607, 13289, 12017, 19099, 11191, 20835, 1698, 20523, 9826, 5505, 2820, 12083, 24867, 5092, 886, 14648, 7567, 6336, 20487, 15878, 20423, 16328, 10013, 19071, 10676, 250, 15111, 150, 12938, 9849, 16975, 19951, 6007, 8567, 6400, 10736, 19999, 85, 10555, 2138, 22542, 6858, 122, 916, 7400, 9496, 4892, 16903, 20656, 4366, 9936, 21619, 24292, 10455, 8364, 7864, 18570, 24951, 582, 13746, 5357, 6652, 1306, 12900, 24728, 8169, 13967, 8575, 12747, 19757, 25452, 6946, 25306, 6058, 14857, 18065, 9028, 24733, 25202, 9124, 14615, 20288, 18641, 6156, 3866, 10957, 17543, 8203, 14929, 11816, 13182, 12534, 11187, 24633, 8628, 11979, 15572, 2721, 21164, 14640, 12399, 24554, 18906, 7822, 18776, 14926, 4522, 24533, 17272, 15507, 10008, 2339, 12251, 3984, 22656, 23227, 7435, 14452, 6500, 231, 18801, 12846, 24027, 25094, 72, 12132, 16691, 24808, 5153, 733, 13104, 12172, 461, 19767, 1316, 24406, 4379, 11781, 10579, 10040, 13550, 5920, 1259, 23840, 3116, 15667, 3257, 15307, 24204, 22760, 16581, 11084, 6167, 16711, 2956, 9693, 9412, 19452, 13788, 11951, 13794, 23976, 6022, 15472, 11093, 5818, 1339, 20649, 13310, 12097, 8667, 24663, 6985, 10047, 15398, 15890, 9551, 2347, 9227, 24523, 5322, 21586, 21397, 642, 1451, 23812, 204, 23467, 7863, 10396, 11434, 11881, 954, 5466, 19072, 3847, 24699, 23709, 14567, 19998, 4952, 3188, 1178, 235, 14711, 650, 5166, 23159, 15159, 10619, 2899, 9140, 1245, 9977, 10747, 14674 ]
reddit_dump_0ompa-Loompa
[ [ "A Supreme Court of Canada decision in 1984 (the Strait of Georgia Reference) held that, when British Columbia entered Confederation in 1871, the province consisted of all British territories, including dry land, coastal straits and submerged lands.\n\n_URL_0_\n\nConstitutional law—Ownership of the bed of the Juan de Fuca, Georgia, Johnstone and Queen Charlotte Straits—Whether federal or provincial property—Territorial Waters Jurisdiction Act, 1878 (U.K.), 41-42 Vict., c. 73—An Act for the Union of the Colony of Vancouver Island with the Colony of British Columbia, 1866 (U.K.), 29-30 Vict., c. 67.\n\nThe Lieutenant-Governor in Council of British Columbia referred to the British Columbia Court of Appeal the following constitutional question:\n\nAre the lands or any part or parts thereof including the mineral and other natural resources of the seabed and subsoil, covered by the waters of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, the Strait of Georgia… Johnstone Strait and Queen Charlotte Strait… the property of\n\n[Page 389]\n\nthe Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia?\n\nThe majority of the Court of Appeal concluded that the land and waters between Vancouver Island and the mainland were, at Confederation, within the province and answered the question in the affirmative. The Attorney General of Canada appealed from the decision. The provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Alberta and Newfoundland intervened in support of the Attorney General of British Columbia. \n\n_URL_1_", "773" ], [ "They can get it across land. However a SCOC ruling on constitutional law in the 80s over ownership of coastal waters Canada or BC could have an impact. SCOC ruled BCs owned its coastal waters since Confederation and was backed by AB in the ruling.\n\nEven if the BC govt approved the pipeline still the native land rights case before the courts. The majority of BC first Nations have no such treaties with the Crown to give up land rights.", "307" ], [ "Comments in hear are brutal.\n\nAlmost every post is resorting to playground level name calling to argue a point. Hell some are evening wishing death and violence on others. \n\nIn a democratic nation you'll always have different view points. If you wanna strong arm your way by violence and death to get your wants you probably belong in a third world dictatorship.", "272" ], [ "The federal NDP have aligned closer with the BC NDP couple months back already as well. I don't expect <PERSON> to do anything other than continue to virtue signal it will be built.\n\nThe nail in this coffin was him not living up to his campaign promise of fixing the NEB and resubmitting the project. Yet he told BC after being elected project approved but that NEB still needs a fixin.", "578" ], [ "Spills on land are water have different regulations.\n\n Taxpayers will pay for the cleanup and recovery while a trial plays out and payment would come years down the road from the corporation if its on land. \n\nWhat happens when the shipping company goes bankrupt because its been set up as a shell corporation strictly to limit financial responsibility? Things like this haven't been answered. BC currently has a trial going through provincial courts relating to a bunker fuel spill and the owner of the ship is denying responsibility and didn't show up for the court case.", "291" ], [ "You mention ABs economy and workers a whole lot. Now try and think about BCs economy and workers as well. Tourism, fishing, real estate, and so on. All things that would be effect in the case of spill. These are real concerns as well and its not BCs job to threaten its own economy and workers for the expense of AB. \n\nTry not looking at it from soley the position of AB.", "866" ], [ "I'm pointing out to the former bc liberals had been running BC from corporate boardrooms in AB. One of the reasons BC has a new government it wasn't representing its people. Now they are just like <PERSON> is representing ABs interest.\n\nAll the focus is on the BC govt and everyone is overlooking the bigger threat to the pipeline native land rights which is before the courts. Most of BCs first Nations have no such treaties with the Crown. That is the biggest obstacle to this project and has precedent setting cases from the SCOC. Also don't forget <PERSON> signed onto the UN declaration for Indigenous rights. \n\nBC ndp could approve this tomorrow and it won't change a thing relating to that case.", "866" ], [ "More n more stuff keeps coming out how the BC libs had been playing a shell game and raped n pillaged the province while in power. Suppressing reports, shutting down money laundering teams when brought lots of evidence, running up huge debt at BC hydro and icbc, having oil companies write legislation in AB.\n\nThey've been exposed and have the same players/strategy that got us here.", "578" ], [ "Could you answer why with the existing pipeline and tankers it still goes to the US?\n\nI haven't seen a business case that new markets will suddenly open up because of the expansion. They have oil and tankers currently and its still selling for a discount. It will always sell for a discount due to costing more to extract and refine. That gets over looked to much.", "745" ], [ "Corporate welfare.\n\nSadly you attract new business with taxpayers money. It's stupid and shouldn't be done however when the majority offer it. \n\nPresent Sask as a business friendly province: cheap housing, educated workforce, and so on.\n\nNeed to complete work to make the province business friendly and worker friendly. What's <PERSON> doing to complete this?", "866" ], [ "They already in court.\n\nThe native land rights Court case isn't being talked about either. <PERSON> can approve this tomorrow but you still have the native land rights case going forward. \n\nBC first Nations are unique as the majority haven't signed treaties with the Crown. This doesn't magically go away with the BC govt approving. \n\n_URL_0_\n\n\"In what legal observers called the most important Supreme Court ruling on aboriginal rights in Canadian history – a culmination of all previous rulings – the court determined that native Canadians still own their ancestral lands, unless they signed away their ownership in treaties with government.\"", "699" ], [ "Try to express your thoughts in clearer sentences and not resort to swearing and name calling. Most people will just push your opinion aside because it brings nothing of value when you start to swear n name call.\n\n''highway protectors\" - really that's what you gonna with? BC is well within its right to protect its coastal waters as they own them not Canada. Here's a SCOC ruling relating to ownership of BCs coastal waters. Ironically enough AB agreed with BC in the case regarding ownership. Highway protectors lmao thanks for the laugh guy. \n\nConstitutional law—Ownership of the bed of the Juan de Fuca, Georgia, Johnstone and Queen Charlotte Straits—Whether federal or provincial property—Territorial Waters Jurisdiction Act, 1878 (U.K.), 41-42 Vict., c. 73—An Act for the Union of the Colony of Vancouver Island with the Colony of British Columbia, 1866 (U.K.), 29-30 Vict., c. 67.\n\nThe Lieutenant-Governor in Council of British Columbia referred to the British Columbia Court of Appeal the following constitutional question:\n\nAre the lands or any part or parts thereof including the mineral and other natural resources of the seabed and subsoil, covered by the waters of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, the Strait of Georgia… Johnstone Strait and Queen Charlotte Strait… the property of the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia?\n\nThe majority of the Court of Appeal concluded that the land and waters between Vancouver Island and the mainland were, at Confederation, within the province and answered the question in the affirmative. The Attorney General of Canada appealed from the decision. The provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Alberta and Newfoundland intervened in support of the Attorney General of British Columbia.\n\n_URL_0_", "307" ], [ "I forgot about the BC rail scandal as well. Guilty pleas and for some reason BC libs shell out 6-7 million dollars for the defendents lawyers.\n\nMost BCers fall for \"balanced budgets\" but don't realize its a balanced operational budget and massive debt is still being added. Balanced budget doesn't mean billions aren't being added to the debt <PERSON> doubled our debt in such a short time.", "264" ], [ "Isn't he planning to cancel the carbon tax regardless... We have already said goodbye to our climate targets. The Feds control and have power over interprovincial pipelines. The SCOC has ruled in BCs favour on constitutional law regarding ownership of Coastal waters.\n\nWe are all a country and Canadians which I don't understand why ramming through a pipeline while not listening to any concerns makes us more Canadian.", "866" ], [ "Wrong on both claims..\n\nConstitutional law—Ownership of the bed of the Juan de Fuca, Georgia, Johnstone and Queen Charlotte Straits—Whether federal or provincial property—Territorial Waters Jurisdiction Act, 1878 (U.K.), 41-42 Vict., c. 73—An Act for the Union of the Colony of Vancouver Island with the Colony of British Columbia, 1866 (U.K.), 29-30 Vict., c. 67.\n\nThe Lieutenant-Governor in Council of British Columbia referred to the British Columbia Court of Appeal the following constitutional question:\n\nAre the lands or any part or parts thereof including the mineral and other natural resources of the seabed and subsoil, covered by the waters of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, the Strait of Georgia… Johnstone Strait and Queen Charlotte Strait… the property of the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia?\n\nThe majority of the Court of Appeal concluded that the land and waters between Vancouver Island and the mainland were, at Confederation, within the province and answered the question in the affirmative. The Attorney General of Canada appealed from the decision. The provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Alberta and Newfoundland intervened in support of the Attorney General of British Columbia.\n\n_URL_1_\n\nWash St has also denied half dozen oil terminals in the last couple years. You should really research what you claim. \n\n_URL_0_\n\nAs of a few years ago, more than a half-dozen crude-by-rail projects were seeking approval in just the western part of Washington, at ports along the Pacific Coast and Columbia River.\n\nTo date, none have succeeded.", "307" ], [ "Shipping originates in coastal straights for one. Yes the federal government can build a railway bridge over a river but what your lashing out at as not true which the courts has established the province is legally allowed to take measures designed to protect its economy, culture, social and environmental interests.\n\nIf you have a fucking problem with that than talk to the courts not people on reddit reporting that.", "307" ], [ "I didn't say first Nations equal province buddy. \n\n\"I’m very clear on what provinces have jurisdiction over and economic development projects are not one of them, and where there is a disagreement, feds win out.\" \n\nThe courts stated:\n\"As long as that regulation is territorially limited within British Columbia to protect B.C. land, waters and the coast … the B.C. Supreme Court set out very clearly in its 2016 Coastal First Nations decision about the Northern Gateway that B.C. not only has the right but the responsibility to take measures designed to protect its economy, culture, social and environmental interests.\"\n\nThank you for displaying your vast knowledge over provincial jurisdiction.", "307" ], [ "Ok can you cite said people what you've claimed. You talked down the article and myself but didn't answer my question nor cite anything.\n\nIf so many are saying what your claiming you should be readily available to provide what your claiming?\n\nI was just asking for sources on what you claimed and you went on a rant about other things...\n\nEdit from article Tripinblls linked:\n\n \"<PERSON>, an economist with the University of Calgary, also said he isn't sure if the laws proposed by Alberta and Saskatchewan could be implemented because the constitution says that export restrictions cannot be levied in a way that is discriminatory across provinces within Canada\"\n\nSo again please cite your sources what your claiming many have stated. It shouldnt be hard if so many are id think", "866" ], [ "<PERSON>, an economist with the University of Calgary, also said he isn't sure if the laws proposed by Alberta and Saskatchewan could be implemented because the constitution says that export restrictions cannot be levied in a way that is discriminatory across provinces within Canada, in terms of the prices charged or supplies delivered.\n\n_URL_0_\n\nWill somebody from the U of Calgary be sufficient for you or will you claim something about him as well?", "866" ], [ "Guessing cause it's not what you wanted to hear? \n\nI was simply providing somebody to counter the UofBC argument with somebody from UofCalgary. \n\nI'm not assuming anything but I'm starting to find it laughable on a daily basis reddit users without providing any credentials are discounting experts as non experts or even uneducated in a field they work in or have a background in.", "859" ], [ "I oppose it because of the lack of oil spill resources and inadequate science on clean up's. \n\nWhich a big spill would wipe out any benefits of this project and more than likely leave taxpayers with clean up costs. \n\nAlmost like I'm capable of looking at more than one issue at time. It must suck being only able to handle one issue at a time.\n\nIf you can handle more than one issue at a time why don't you watch MLA <PERSON> speech on the emergency debate about KM and the lack of leadership <PERSON> and <PERSON> have shown on this file. \n\nEdit spelling", "771" ], [ "Lol\n\nWas interesting to see after China announced these <PERSON> suddenly wanting back into TPP11. \n\nWhen those soybeans among other goods are more expensive to import due to tarrifs on the US importers will find another market to source goods from without tarrifs that high. \n\nIf you don't think retaliatory tarrifs placed on the US by China or the EU specifically targeting trumps base won't hurt I dno what to tell you.", "745" ], [ "The funny thing is when he walked away the first time countries dropped what the US wanted. Him walking away wasn't in the best interest of the US as he lost any control he had in getting a good deal for the US.\n\nCountries said when they modified it and signed a better deal that if the US wants back in its a take it or leave it deal. Even now they've come out and said the exact samething negotiations aren't going to be opened to please the US take it or leave it. \n\nWalking away was just as stupid as it now trying to come back after the deals been signed and governments are ratifying it in their countries.", "308" ], [ "I've seen two different analysts way lower than <PERSON> who gets coverage due to spitting out such high numbers that grab peoples attention. He fails to mention Wash St can receive large quantities of fuel imports. The price will rise but its not gonna be the apocalypse he's making it out to be. \n\n_URL_0_", "96" ] ]
438
[ 19060, 10886, 19068, 11039, 10182, 17119, 13576, 15299, 20224, 16431, 5781, 24193, 17431, 17372, 14976, 2246, 17281, 9847, 17469, 15083, 23840, 23799, 14248, 1017, 21230, 7170, 19781, 13538, 19322, 20570, 10476, 12808, 17528, 22803, 17716, 9707, 24535, 20495, 25308, 11119, 17549, 21387, 25475, 4794, 10081, 11641, 22597, 10958, 21911, 25041, 10079, 8659, 6697, 10198, 2332, 5070, 13216, 2017, 1680, 8117, 23247, 2105, 5141, 18780, 25240, 15993, 9971, 20423, 16988, 578, 22543, 16148, 13589, 19464, 13783, 15136, 1467, 1799, 16907, 8363, 14545, 650, 13851, 2718, 1198, 23374, 18070, 8396, 4157, 15366, 1504, 20860, 4371, 13991, 5881, 1185, 21008, 6232, 745, 20323, 5331, 5364, 4227, 13427, 1763, 8216, 14969, 17376, 2276, 4558, 16327, 8915, 3209, 9261, 864, 11765, 9693, 17762, 22904, 23151, 13631, 14660, 15467, 13414, 8869, 16208, 8790, 4996, 6119, 10020, 17800, 7057, 18001, 18104, 18435, 4897, 5596, 13892, 18971, 3315, 10453, 10296, 4526, 23701, 21894, 18222, 2279, 23500, 2557, 10312, 1312, 14824, 14049, 16188, 23458, 16938, 24261, 20832, 4857, 11149, 23470, 5991, 1339, 15183, 16693, 15339, 22188, 7331, 24440, 14773, 3529, 24864, 9996, 5267, 17656, 13428, 10013, 24882, 2650, 3039, 2441, 22134, 4285, 25333, 19303, 9833, 15086, 7390, 20991, 12293, 6123, 24781, 7407, 22183, 24366, 9733, 9677, 10867, 21164, 21104, 10718, 24281, 7048, 20953, 11884, 19356, 18904, 4768, 23687, 21271, 24825, 14508, 11758, 20291, 2463, 17678, 253, 3824, 536, 9511, 22520, 2003, 20798, 24499, 15489, 17399, 5388, 20083, 1425, 1895, 7145, 13812, 24162, 10176, 135, 7921, 10023, 4375, 19376, 25072, 2294, 11321, 18362, 18695, 17017, 21047, 9381, 19404, 14273, 18042, 9150, 13016, 7539, 679, 21256, 5841, 3618, 24734, 6156, 19107, 16989, 3868, 6741, 11908, 18341, 22812, 7954, 13515, 19749, 8454, 8695, 19416, 2510, 7992, 17612, 1073, 24814, 23663, 9368, 23637, 21152, 9453, 25049, 3277, 2806, 3532, 8420, 171, 6120, 14494, 5697, 12846, 24901, 19780, 22950, 22603, 18905, 1309, 1755, 838, 15036, 2142, 2820, 18012, 20219, 7150, 22834, 20406, 22841, 5742, 21153, 7828, 4002, 11448, 11186, 13967, 10011, 14434, 23251, 13628, 11295, 2046, 16003, 21599, 17048, 6685, 22254, 14296, 7569, 20392, 877, 11726, 23955, 16484, 4129, 7665, 14406, 7622, 13577, 5948, 2652, 6355, 6970, 5440, 3381, 4824, 11781, 16083, 410, 5818, 14595, 254, 11816, 5334, 5301, 19759, 13778, 5772, 9562, 25360, 18828, 16802, 16331, 18882, 25066, 18381, 18387, 14648, 21579, 14269, 10653, 21843, 12107, 19125, 20986, 12001, 22360, 5715, 12409, 15896, 2663, 12129, 20293, 10173, 18335, 10733, 20462, 19809, 7515, 4845, 23203, 23288, 18302, 9227, 5590, 3797, 8703, 24436, 11610, 13746, 1238, 6140, 14915, 5518, 11036, 5258, 19916, 15643, 5537, 3524, 19756, 6908, 1833, 3735, 3505, 16929, 15251, 11225, 10614, 12916, 19661, 8592, 23152, 23476, 13419, 18864, 24770, 178, 7977, 19114, 868, 7609, 19502, 17512, 24056, 14881, 5271, 17471, 10727, 18003, 1990, 12160, 2166, 16309, 12544, 11305, 2487, 14750, 21804, 2131, 4058, 2908, 9537, 14220, 20828, 6093, 11499, 14885, 18567, 22155, 4168, 20671, 10918, 7574, 25358, 10751, 14466, 7985, 2275, 6950, 15545, 5060, 9210, 22030, 6684, 18166, 18371, 7610, 13875, 2779, 23187, 13316, 3633, 1765, 17505, 10785, 8563, 25341, 1723, 24329, 10759, 23125, 22600, 11853, 17906, 21522, 24487, 22322, 21925 ]
reddit_dump_0ooo
[ [ "I don't think you're reading it correctly. It's saying that viewing non-heterosexual gender practices as the same but with ' < gender practice > ' replacing 'heterosexual' is viewing non-heterosexual gender practices through the lens of heterosexuality, and applying heterosexual meanings to understandings of the practices. They're saying you're seeing these presentations as a replication of heterosexual presentations, but with a change to the window dressings, which is a fundamental misunderstanding. \n\nYou should cite which source you're getting this quote from, so that we can see the context in which it appears.", "654" ], [ "You've grossly misunderstood this study. For participants they drew from a population of men who were getting treatment for hypersexual behavior. They were studying ADHD *within* this population. The goal of the study was to look at which features of ADHD explain the tendency towards being hypersexual, i.e. they were asking \"why is this population largely made up of men with ADHD\", as opposed to \"why does every man with ADHD have hypersexual tendencies?\" They are not suggesting that *everyone* with ADHD is hypersexual.", "91" ], [ "> This has always been one of the weirdest aspects of the Star Trek timeline -- TOS already looked really dated by the 70s \n\nThis isn't strange at all when you consider the budgets they were working with. TOS episodes were made with [budgets of ~190,000 USD, the most expensive topping out at ~250,000 USD](_URL_1_), while *Star Wars: A New Hope* had a budget of [11 million USD](_URL_0_).\n\nWhen *TNG* was given [1.3 million USD to work with](_URL_1_) for each episode, we *did* end up with some timeless looking tech.", "610" ], [ "I think people also need to keep in mind that dressing nicely and putting thought and effort into your appearance does not necessarily mean wearing suits. You can build outfits that are appropriate for the context of your industry out of quality items, after all the devil is in the details. An outfit that speaks to someone having an eye for detail and being able to build a cohesive whole from individual items says better things about them than robotically checking the 'suit' box off, imo.", "179" ], [ "Is it possible that Voyager is slyly encouraging the spread of false information? \n\nIf you're the \"new kid on the block\", you don't want every aggressive power in the region seeking you out to take whatever new or interesting technology you have by force. With that in mind, it's better to let people think you're a \"ship of death\" than wide eyed explorers who are in reality simply lost.", "136" ], [ "[This looks like a pretty well source explanation of why stimulant meds help treat ADHD.](_URL_0_)\n\n > I see a lot of conflicting information - some saying that meds do affect people with adhd differently, while others say that everyone will experience the same enhancements\n\nWhen you see things like this, you have to ask yourself: *Who* is saying these things? Are they qualified to make these conclusions? What are their sources of information? Don't accept everything you see as the truth on the matter, be critical.", "91" ], [ "\"Super focus\" is really a myth/fundamental misunderstanding of the disorder. It's just the ADHD symptom of having trouble with task switching, but that people are desperately trying to spin into being a positive aspect of ADHD. Any extra drive towards one specific thing is independent of the disorder, and usually just means the person is on the 'high functioning' end of the disorder.", "91" ], [ "> Does anyone have insight on this?\n\nYou are really missing the forest for the trees here. Stop looking for a reason to make these meds bad, try to excise the societal ignorance and shame about taking medication for mental health problems from your thinking. These grades are how you can perform when you're not struggling against the full force of your symptoms every day. \n\n[This video is about why stimulant meds help people with ADHD.](_URL_0_) Give it a watch, I feel like if you have a better understanding of why the meds work, you'll feel better about taking them.", "91" ], [ "Myth: ADHD isn't real and is made up by pharmaceutical companies in order create a new market for drugs.\n\nThere are a frightening amount of people who still don't think that ADHD is real, despite a veritable mountain of empirical evidence. It feels like almost every day this sub gets a post from someone who is prevented from getting the treatment they need because their parents don't believe that ADHD is real.", "91" ] ]
99
[ 18113, 3001, 11547, 2909, 23164, 5338, 19699, 19656, 24416, 23211, 11707, 8341, 3786, 13196, 8509, 6002, 23797, 6064, 22679, 5724, 4464, 3864, 11337, 17424, 16574, 20890, 14956, 18596, 21213, 17666, 19614, 1175, 12599, 10097, 20043, 8773, 10836, 4102, 21660, 15435, 9685, 25474, 662, 13051, 101, 16187, 11608, 8516, 8712, 3330, 18018, 10499, 24507, 24674, 5333, 8719, 14020, 15968, 8630, 1560, 1406, 6236, 25418, 25429, 18980, 14214, 12361, 11892, 7104, 20436, 11169, 8395, 1781, 10467, 1477, 12146, 18127, 18272, 24200, 23021, 629, 17829, 8118, 10414, 17974, 469, 11999, 9222, 21354, 8232, 1993, 92, 11748, 10806, 9228, 24112, 10959, 11103, 5145, 768, 17455, 628, 24982, 20286, 15979, 6403, 75, 12380, 4774, 21166, 20147, 17947, 2521, 12700, 11177, 11291, 15831, 15053, 4953, 6299, 12714, 23638, 18654, 2453, 25300, 19840, 10629, 23903, 16329, 2520, 16616, 5988, 13380, 1884, 23091, 12493, 13006, 11460, 11548, 24443, 22213, 13062, 1095, 16015, 21351, 20270, 6567, 6137, 7278, 18460, 13913, 5173, 25530, 8699, 2433, 11147, 3691, 20325, 6808, 15711, 16675, 6987, 9638, 1738, 12899, 11754, 17547, 9614, 15854, 9191, 9593, 22757, 1249, 4184, 16738, 9626, 8476, 19087, 19537, 14294, 3120, 15441, 12551, 11156, 7993, 1103, 18720, 5699, 2381, 10916, 13162, 25442, 20364, 21374, 18969, 2694, 24240, 17133, 1256, 2675, 21223, 16619, 8365, 3056, 16839, 2401, 13294, 14872, 21493, 20287, 21840, 8528, 17563, 6873, 4055, 7136, 4658, 23444, 13017, 12756, 15909, 6482, 10630, 22668, 20893, 10343, 10546, 20033, 21158, 5519, 11410, 22315, 12760, 5494, 24339, 3879, 23895, 18187, 676, 17498, 581, 13094, 13322, 22569, 18035, 23707, 14133, 25431, 23124, 11278, 3885, 4178, 8544, 3739, 11531, 15500, 22589, 10362, 2176, 3004, 1102, 17227, 22650, 12328, 5169, 12880, 24260, 7662, 22828, 18067, 18974, 21891, 17600, 18364, 18265, 12748, 376, 6420, 5341, 1623, 7348, 22886, 15173, 17053, 13708, 6666, 2035, 21070, 6731, 20944, 14297, 11798, 19292, 25304, 7033, 10107, 21834, 8462, 7212, 15602, 5018, 4338, 6361, 17639, 15906, 9507, 19526, 17040, 12879, 11625, 21044, 11338, 6794, 13059, 24139, 8386, 8722, 12108, 12486, 14823, 6274, 18198, 18697, 19500, 11451, 1248, 3351, 14520, 19106, 24942, 8248, 10658, 17970, 10724, 23653, 21148, 23570, 20820, 18748, 17298, 22392, 17777, 12051, 20449, 23486, 23772, 6402, 13025, 18323, 12396, 18398, 15415, 23631, 16935, 15404, 17739, 2849, 17004, 12926, 23899, 13160, 13453, 24792, 4499, 16464, 1654, 25131, 9769, 15319, 20807, 10897, 20983, 21293, 25317, 4887, 5532, 16920, 3593, 23492, 6989, 4783, 5238, 567, 9139, 8249, 18660, 11994, 21120, 4564, 4850, 18723, 2178, 23826, 16167, 18640, 5653, 14287, 3224, 871, 14238, 765, 22749, 18789, 7062, 24338, 10960, 19259, 8044, 11935, 17229, 21984, 16869, 20194, 22422, 15777, 16394, 6807, 17012, 4202, 21025, 6803, 635, 2373, 9283, 25148, 19779, 16809, 1229, 9481, 19878, 21311, 23332, 6458, 10977, 16258, 21706, 12463, 4304, 14726, 10651, 22248, 1732, 14501, 6820, 14121, 21326, 21876, 22234, 19310, 14062, 993, 17747, 22235, 23042, 21376, 19548, 18785, 7957, 10708, 8398, 2445, 11937, 24311, 21810, 4619, 15853, 22059, 2545, 13554, 10309, 9355, 18611, 24206, 5744, 14474, 21719, 22117, 11831, 21314, 6543, 7332, 22906, 15019, 4939, 21680, 6850, 2064, 7052, 25387, 16800, 12400, 8281, 18554, 24354, 17406, 3578, 14606, 11065, 4378 ]
reddit_dump_0wen_Meany
[ [ "Great point about tolerating the fringe one leans to. I’ve spent a very long time to grow intentional objectivity. But I think it’s easier for some reason from the left. I see tons of liberals decrying fires and looting. But it’s rare to see a Republican who honestly favors an election winner being called an election winner. \n\nI thought when <PERSON> named his Cabinet, at least the educated people on the right who understand the political compass would come around. And in a way, that has happened as evidenced by the stock market. \n\nBut the people who get it are very afraid to say so in the workplace and on social media. So what we tend to hear is the fringe right, with everyone else hiding for the moment.", "886" ], [ "This is really interesting. Your mom is misinformed as to the position that is most predominant in the Q movement. I’ll do my best to explain.\n\nThis fable revolves around something called NESARA/GESARA. It stands for National/Global Economic Security and Reformation Act. At least up until now, the Qult did not see a “financial reset” as a commie plot at all. Rather, it is a very key component within their greater myth of the “Thousand Year Reign”. \n\nBasically they believe <PERSON> and <PERSON> are ushering in a literal perfect world. (Once they execute all the people like us who don’t agree with giving <PERSON> total power over everything on earth.) This perfect world will last a thousand years. \n\nNesara was either an actual thing that never got any traction, or some larpers made the whole thing up. At very very best, it was supposedly a House bill that never made it out of committee. And it absolutely never will make it out of a committee, nor would any sane legislator even admit to knowing about it. \n\nWithout going into much detail, what it boils down to in Qult minds, is forgiveness of all their debts. Is it communism? Sure it is. But it’s the *good kind* apparently. \n\nWe’ve made fun of them for years about this and how it’s socialism/communism. So I wouldn’t be surprised if some of them have turned it around now and made it the work of <PERSON> and the supervillains. And maybe that’s the narrative your mom heard. But I can assure you, the majority of Qultists are dreaming big on getting all their debts canceled. Any day now, of course. \n\n[Here’s a post I did with some background on the story several months ago.](_URL_0_) The story actually originated from another cult that predates the Q movement. \n\nI think it’s important to note, this partly explains many of the people who are showing life and death devotion to <PERSON>. I have no doubt there are thousands of people in dire financial circumstances, and they have come to believe this fable is true. So it’s no wonder, with <PERSON> losing they see this dream of being debt free going away with him. \n\nThere are also stories of Qultists claiming online that they’ve borrowed the max amount of money they possibly can, since they had this “inside information”. I’ve never seen any confirmation of that actually happening, and I hope it hasn’t. \n\nThis is just one part of the underbelly of the new Qanon religion, but it’s one of the most tragic in its level of meanness and its consequences.", "811" ], [ "On one hand it’s getting worse, I agree. But more and more people are moving on. <PERSON> included. He swore in Senator <PERSON> yesterday. Can’t do that if he believes <PERSON>’s election wasn’t valid. \n\n<PERSON> today said “more than several” Republicans have called him privately to say congrats. Unless we see 48 Senators come out in the next 24 hours and say “*by <PERSON> that ain’t true fer me. I’m gone hep <PERSON> overturn this lection!*”...then <PERSON> is telling the truth. \n\nAlso the <PERSON>-Powell group is in a war with the Trump Campaign. And <PERSON> is trying to tweet herself into innocence over <PERSON>’s inauguration enrichment. \n\nThis clown show is just not the kinda thing that’s going to impress honest Americans. If you’ll notice, only the people deluded enough to believe they’re going to inherit the <PERSON> cult are backing <PERSON>. <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>, <PERSON>...like that. Opportunists.\n\nBut many more I think are seeing the hero status that <PERSON> and the Georgia Republicans have achieved by speaking up for what is right. Most of them won’t speak up until December 14th, because they are cowards. But most will acknowledge <PERSON> that day I hope.", "220" ], [ "Yeah I definitely haven’t seen much evidence they’re moving to bargaining yet. I keep thinking one of their leaders will come up with a useable story that will start making them look past all this. \n\nBut for me this is pure denial still. The Qultists on Twitter are completely flummoxed at the majority asking for evidence of fraud. Why would we need that, they ask? They just totally don’t understand why every American, except for a few thousand baby-eaters, won’t just admit we all voted for <PERSON>. \n\nI’m not even kidding. They honestly believe he “won in a landslide”. It could be the most ridiculous collective belief ever held by so many in modern American history. I figure 20-25% in total see it this way.", "210" ], [ "That’s great. I can definitely see <PERSON> doing something like that, and then <PERSON> screaming into the phone on Inauguration Day that he’s not seeing any parachutes. \n\nI do think <PERSON> will be a very central character in the eventual mini-series. It’s impossible to believe that <PERSON> hasn’t at least hinted at whether the General is willing to be <PERSON>’s <PERSON>.\n\nIt’s also impossible to believe that even <PERSON> would’ve agreed to be <PERSON>’s <PERSON>. Just today he reminded everyone yet again that he eventually turns on everybody, with his attack on <PERSON>. Put the Executioner in his control, and one bad comment at breakfast could be the end of anybody. \n\nWho’s going to help make a guy like that a dictator besides totally powerless losers? The <PERSON> boys and <PERSON>/Scavino et al may be that, and maybe even <PERSON> in a <PERSON> world. But not the generals. Nope.", "1007" ], [ "At some point they have to face that the most ridiculous things never happened and never will. <PERSON> told them just after *the Storm* that “95% of the people will be in the hospital”. \n\nLet’s set aside for a second that there are less than a million hospital beds in the whole country. \n\nLet’s set aside how <PERSON> is going to exempt doctors and nurses from The Big Sickening so the hospitalized can be cared for. \n\nBut there’s got to be a day, when Crazy <PERSON> is golfing and tweeting deranged things from the comfort of Mar-a-Lago, that it will eventually dawn that there ain’t no *Storm*.", "270" ], [ "Thanks for posting these. We need to the reminders every day. \n\nI’ve got to look a quote before next time to add to the comments. It was an article about why these people are so fired up about trans people in bathrooms when it doesn’t affect them one iota. \n\nThat reminds me of what I’m seeing out of these people, who are so damn scared and probably live in an 80% <PERSON> rural area.", "847" ], [ "I would just add, for absolute proof of this, one only needs to read their constant whining and complaining on Twitter after every recount and lost court case. \n\n“Republicans should do the recounts.”\n\n“We didn’t see those signatures on the envelopes.”\n\n“It wasn’t a *real* audit!”\n\n“The watchers were six feet away but should’ve been three feet away.”\n\nAnd if it had been three feet, they would’ve wanted *one foot*. Nothing is ever good enough for them, exactly like every 9/11 or <PERSON> conspiracy theorist. When some shard of their “evidence” is clearly explained in detail by a scientist, they move the goal posts and want something else.\n\nIt’s rarely about the truth, because they are starting with *belief* and hunting for specks of dust to prove that *belief*. It’s about being right, getting their way, winning. And specifically in this case, it’s about keeping <PERSON> in power, with zero regard for who the voters in these states chose.", "210" ], [ "Absolutely. I don’t remember how much I said in that old post, but I’ve mentioned the consequences before. \n\nDebt cancelation would result in the immediate loss of short and long term financing necessary to even feed the population. Unless of course you continue to take the communism angle to more severe steps and have the government distribute food to everyone. \n\nMany other consequences too numerous to mention would follow. War, mob rule (which is part of the <PERSON> dream also, because they’re so stupid), worthless equities and retirement plans overnight, and the end of banking. \n\nI certainly understand why people who don’t understand capital think it would be a breeze to just “forgive debt”. So that’s really the only valid outcome of this particular myth...we get to see just how ignorant so many people are about economics.", "499" ], [ "From the Pee-Body and Bulshitzer Prize winning journos at “Creative Destruction Media”. \n\nWe should all do a circular firing squad for not starting one of these larp outlets years ago. Especially once we saw how many subscribers could be generated by convincing people the Jade Helmses were invading. \n\nWe would’ve sold five million magic salt tablets by now. “Our Giddy-Gulp is *good to grow!*...When you need more heart, honeys, hair and hard-on’s.”", "434" ], [ "Yep. And in just a few short years we’ve gone from them saying this stuff on anonymous sites to now openly cheering for it on Facebook. \n\nAnd the biggest problem all the rest of us have is the 45+ Republican Senators waiting in the wings trying to decide if they’re willing to agree to <PERSON>. \n\nWhich is completely stunning to me. A fella who’s never been loyal to a soul in life. He’s the last person you’d give a blank check on mass murder. But I suppose he’s also the first person who’s been unAmerican and sociopathic enough to try it. \n\nCase in point, <PERSON>, who had to hear <PERSON> call his wife ugly and his father a murderer. He’s not even waiting in the wings, he’s big time on board. People can say it’s because he wants the <PERSON> vote in four years. \n\nBut I don’t believe it. There are too many moderate Republicans who are going to punish this drive for fascism. Either he’s compromised, or he stupidly thinks he’s gonna get to share the power.", "800" ], [ "Tell him you picked up the latest Nephilim manual on telepathy and it’s taught you so much, you just can’t put it down. \n\nThen, “To protect secrecy, there’s only one way to access the book. I’m transmitting the ordering info with my mind. If you’re chosen to receive, you’ll know it.”\n\nBy tomorrow he’ll be asking you for a second chance.", "206" ], [ "I soaked em good up until the day after the election. All the good markets were gone, so I thought “<PERSON> concedes by X date” was a good buy at 7 cents. I stupidly figured he would move on with a shred of dignity and do his TV network grift. I guessed at least there would be news along the way that would make it a volatile mover. Nada. I got killed.\n\nI should’ve stuck with the sure investments at 85-90 cents. But I just thought 15/1 odds on a yes-no play was worth the gamble with my winnings.\n\nEdit to add: and the <PERSON> gymnastics in all the comment sections are worth it even when you lose.", "834" ], [ "Gotta think <PERSON> is laughing from the grave and thinking if he didn’t try this “strategy” it doesn’t exist. \n\nHappened to read up on him lately and saw this on wiki. Amazing how prescient history is, and now we know what happens when the system doesn’t expel self-serving rats. If only “disinterested politics” was a virtue again, and “self-serving nature” was a disqualifier:\n\n > <PERSON>, a leading scholar of the revolutionary period, holds that it was <PERSON>'s character that put him at odds with the rest of the \"founding fathers,\" especially <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON>. He believed that this led to his personal and political defeats and, ultimately, to his place outside the golden circle of revered revolutionary figures. Because of <PERSON>'s habit of placing self-interest above the good of the whole, those men thought that <PERSON> represented a serious threat to the ideals for which they had fought the revolution. Their ideal, as particularly embodied in Washington and <PERSON>, was that of \"disinterested politics,\" a government led by educated gentlemen. They would fulfill their duties in a spirit of public virtue and without regard to personal interests or pursuits. This was the core of an Enlightenment gentleman, and <PERSON>'s political enemies thought that he lacked that essential core. <PERSON> thought that <PERSON>'s self-serving nature made him unfit to hold office, especially the presidency.", "533" ], [ "What is “pretty close to the truth”? <PERSON> contains 11 letters, doesn’t it? I’m not sure that qualifies as all that close in the realm of letter-counting spooky connections. \n\nAlso not sure why your alleged employer has any bearing on it. You can either provide solid evidence that <PERSON> and <PERSON> are manufacturing microscopic bioweapons or you can’t.", "452" ], [ "I saw some of this last night, and they fully believe it. It reminds me of the mole children ordeal. There was a day after the hospital ships arrived, and the Qult all just went, “They got em. Pack it up, boys.”\n\nIt was the only way to cope with a ridiculous story that had to have an end game. Because there were no mole kiddies ever gonna surface out of Central Park. \n\nSame thing last night. “Whew, dodged a bullet with those Chinese in Canada. We bombed em, every last one, evaporated. Too bad all the evidence is burned up so clean there’s not even any smoke.”\n\nSet aside that bombing doesn’t work that way for 50,000 “troops”. The real head scratcher here is whether this belief is an unconscious defense mechanism. Or, if even these Qultists absolutely know it’s bullshit, so they help along the plot holes, because they can’t stand the thought of the game ending.", "226" ], [ "You are right to be concerned, and I’m sorry for your past losses of loved one and what you’re going through today. I don’t want to downplay the Q situation, but I do think the bigger risk factor is the family history and no so much the Q environment.\n\nI see no indication they won’t continue to be entirely future-focused. There’s always something to be either happy about, hopeful about, or terrified of. But the fact that none of it ever pans out is the key. This has shown us that the drug is the “information”...that thing-of-the-moment they desire or fear. It’s not the actual events they happen to actually be living through. \n\nRight now it’s the whole Chinese army camped out across the Maine border. Every sentient being with a lick of sense knows that is fiction. And there’s no way around it, she’s eventually going to see nothing ever happens and move on to something else. Again, the something else is the drug. \n\n<PERSON> as a source for intrigue and excitement is going to be like watching paint dry. The terror of Communism or death camps or a tax on microwave food are going to have to come from the people who invent Q fiction, because <PERSON>’s aim is going to be to give Americans a break from thinking about the Presidency 40 times a day. \n\nWhile there may be some real instances of self-harm, I don’t think it will be widespread. And most importantly, I think it will come from *withdrawal of the drug* if it comes from anything. In other words, if the sources they’re going to for intrigue can’t keep it interesting and terrifying for them (due to a boring <PERSON> Admin), then some deep depression could occur. \n\nThing is, there’s now a whole industry around building Patreon content for this new movement. I think there will be plenty of conspiracy and rumor and decodes to keep them busy. \n\nIt would be awesome if she could redirect that need to a better energy. That’s what we all hope for among the Q faithful that are in way too deep. I’m wishing that for you and for her. All the best.", "827" ], [ "The fact that Republicans hate the sliver of objectivity <PERSON> exercised in office is unsurprising. What’s shocking is this sudden need for Republicans in podunk backwaters to publicly signal their radical devotion to <PERSON>. \n\nThese resolutions are purity tests to prove membership in the Fringe Lunatics Society. I predict very soon they’re going to create a uniform or a scarf or a burqa or a patch, and it must be worn at all times to keep from getting primaried. \n\nI’m entirely serious. Outward genuflecting is the requirement of the day, and the toadies who require it will surely make identification easier for each other. \n\n2021 is going to be a 24/7 purity test on the right. It’s going to be pure misery for Repub legislators who wouldn’t be caught dead in these Qultists’ presence if they didn’t need their votes. It’s going to be Heaven for the true believers like <PERSON> and <PERSON>. \n\nMainstream Republicans better get off their ass today and take the party back, because they’re eventually gonna get eaten either way. Look at Little <PERSON>. He has fringe-signaled so hard his rotator cuffs are shot. But he’s gonna get primaried by <PERSON> or <PERSON> or whomever Daddy chooses. They better band together right now, today, and say this is our party, if you want a new one you need to build it.", "800" ], [ "As to civil trials, I suspect everyone has sovereign immunity inside the government. But lots of very wealthy individuals and orgs may certainly be named in suits. \n\nCriminally, it’s a good question whether “just incompetence” rises to provable criminal negligence. But it’s very hard to imagine this person decided on his own to not protect the US Capitol. \n\nI’m betting the interview with the CapPol chief is the most sought after in DC this week. It’s doubtful his attorneys will allow that though, unless it helps his case by shifting the attention upwards a notch or two. \n\nI think police leadership will be charged in some instances and do a plea deal, but that’s just spitballing.", "693" ], [ "Yes, it’s at very least Q-adjacent. Since the Capitol I’m seeing an effort to erase Q from the language of the latest Apocalypse promises. But by any other name, it’s all Q. I think there are multiple tentacles of grifters looking to win the crowd at the moment, so what we’re seeing is largely a Q rebranding. \n\nWho will win is anyone’s guess.", "609" ], [ "I learned today that some of them are getting their info from a guy named <PERSON>. You won’t like what you find when you find his bio. But from what I’ve gathered, he was promoted by <PERSON> this weekend, and he’s the one giving them hour by hour lies about the President’s speech (which didn’t even happen tonight)\n\nPlus he’s doing the usual 10 days of darkness softball, where they all become convinced <PERSON> has one of those <PERSON> switches from Acme that shut the whole world down. \n\nI can’t guarantee that’s where it’s coming from today, but you might check to see if that rings a bell.", "452" ], [ "I heard <PERSON> from God last night for the first time in at least a year, maybe even two. See if you can find any indication of the name <PERSON>. He’s a British reptilian believer who claims he has sex with an alien in his mother’s womb. \n\nI may work up a post on it tomorrow, but I’d be interested if this RoG stuff is related, because all the *It’s Happening* hysteria I’ve seen since Saturday came from that guy and <PERSON> (who promoted that guy at Parler).", "25" ], [ "Thanks, I got to see it! The lawyer just said he made a mistake in the press conference. Then used language like, “The picture *appeared to show* him holding a lectern.”\n\nEdit to add- Lawyers claim there have been death threats against his family who weren’t in Washington. \nIf true, that’s not right or fair either. I told someone today, I tend to get more upset at people on the left who are void of principles, since I’ve voted for Dem candidates since 2004. \n\nI don’t even know how people who spit at due process and constitutional rights can get mad at the people on the other side who tried to take the country by force. Are they just mad the other side thought of it first? Get some principles and stick to them.", "614" ], [ "> I’ve never been so worried about our national security in my life. We always had to be concerned about outsiders attacking us, but when it’s our own - our mothers and fathers, grandparents, children, who will turn on us and hurt us if they feel threatened...well it’s just a totally new monster like we’ve never encountered before.\n\nSame. I can’t even fathom that <PERSON> is getting to fly to Texas and make another hate speech, surrounded by the border patrol that he has incited so much. \n\nFor the record, I think the odds are virtually 100% that <PERSON> is gonna leave office in disgrace and <PERSON> will be sworn in next week. \n\nHowever. And there a however. I’m not at all happy that <PERSON> and <PERSON> and other Cabinet member resigned, which would keep them from voting <PERSON> unfit to serve in an emergency even bigger than the one we’re in. \n\nThey’ve left him with the slugs who were absolutely fine with a <PERSON> presidency, so they can keep the permanent use of their jet and tax-funded staff for the rest of their lives. \n\nWe could still be in for more instability. And just the simple fact that millions upon millions of Americans are openly in favor of a coup is devastating to me. \n\nThe very same people who swooned when <PERSON> kissed the flag, and used to talk about how they luuuv the constitution. They’re done that crap now. They want their messiah. It’s sickening. And there’s no way to shame them for it, because they have none.", "134" ], [ "Love how it’s gone from “<PERSON>’s laptop” to “20+ laptops with hard drives”. I guess since the original claim wasn’t true, might as well embellish it. \n\nIt’s the <PERSON> school of insider information. This shit is maddening. So stupid for any thinking person, but so dangerous because that’s not what we’re dealing with.", "127" ], [ "I’m not quite so optimistic. You said it right, they’re totally split down the middle affording to post-Wednesday polling. But the Trumplicans (and their Russian allies) are far better at propaganda than educated Repubs. \n\nWhat they’ll do is primary all the educated ones. They’ll win those primaries by making abortion a Satanic ritual “issue”. And then those same educated Republicans who lost their principled Congresspeople will vote with the Trumplicans, because muh aborshun and muh soshulizm.\n\nEven worse news, the educated faction will only be able to fight back with old faithful, tax breaks. Which will kill our tax base, as if it’s not already about dead. \n\nThis is not gonna be the win for Dems that it looks like on paper. Dems already get millions and millions more votes than Rs. But they can’t win in 26-28 states where the people are too easy to scare with the propaganda. \n\nIt’s going to serve to divide the country even further into urban vs rural. Our best, and maybe only chance, is for the corporations to recognize they’ve gone too far, and gotten more than their fair share of benefits these past years. \n\nThey can starve the Trumplicans and Russians, if they will just do it. But we need a healthy Republican Party again. We need a <PERSON> or a <PERSON> or even a <PERSON> in the lead instead of <PERSON> too.", "313" ], [ "If it’s a <PERSON> thing, the best thing to do is hit his credibility hard (he has absolutely none). [Here’s just one article about him from HuffPo.](_URL_0_)\n\nA few excerpts, because others are about to be hearing his name. **Honesty folks, if this guy isn’t a bridge too far for the people in your life, then I’m out of advice:**\n\n > A Labour councillor has claimed he has **fathered a child with an alien and that the regular sex he has with the extra terrestrial** is causing tension in his human marriage.\n\n > <PERSON>, who represents Stakesby on Whitby Town Council, told the Northern Echo he has **had a child called <PERSON> with an alien he refers to as the Cat Queen.**\n\n > The driving instructor, who has three children with his human wife, said **the intercourse with the alien happens about four times a year.**\n\n > ”What will happen is that we will hold hands and I will say ‘I’m ready’ and then the technology I don’t understand **will take us up to a craft orbiting the earth**,\" he said.\n\n > The Labour politician has also claimed he was abducted by extra-terrestrials as a child and that **his “real mother” is a 9ft tall alien with eight fingers.**\n\n > He speaks of his first encounter which occurred while he in the womb, then tells of a being which appeared by his cot when he was six-months-old and reached out to him with “these two green ‘stick things, like beanpoles’.”\n\n > He continued: “I thought, ‘they’re not mummy’s hands, mummy’s hands are pink’, and mummy has thumbs. These are green and pointed and there’s four of them.’\n\n > ”I was looking straight into its face. **It enters my mind through my eyes and it sends a message down my optic nerve into my brain, saying 'I am your real mother, I am your more important mother'.”**\n\n > The 53-year-old recounted his experiences in a YouTube clip. He describes the extra-terrestrial as having “human features” with a kite-shaped face, huge eyes, two tiny holes for a nose and a thin mouth.\n\n > He said: “I’m only telling you what I’ve seen, they could be lying to me. The reason why extra-terrestrials are interested in me is not because of my physical body but what’s inside – my soul.\n\n > ”These reptiles are guilty as hell. They have apologised several times to me. They have said they are sorry for what they have done to your people.”\n\n > <PERSON>, who was a councillor in Hackney during the 1990s, said his experiences have not hindered his work.\n\n > He said: “It’s a personal matter and it doesn’t affect my work. I’m more interested in fixing someone’s leaking roof or potholes. People don’t want me to talk about aliens. “I get more common sense out of the aliens than out of Scarborough Town Hall.”", "797" ], [ "There is a lot of speculation about why this guy is going first, and about why some of these cases have been sealed and others haven’t. Today <PERSON> and <PERSON> have the first briefing by FBI & Justice. It’s the first conference that has happened at all, as far as we know. \n\nWhat I think is this, but maybe it’s just hope: This has the look of a slapdash approach with zero forethought or strategy. But I think there is something afoot. I think <PERSON> is going to fake the leaders out of their jocks and end up with more evidence and more people turning states evidence.", "776" ], [ "A quick suggestion, as I’ve already offered this to others, including an irl friend. If you have a data plan on your phone, you can get internet service with or without electricity. \n\nWhen the power goes off, just go to Twitter. Go to the Search feature and input “power outage”, and sort by latest. Unless you see millions of tweets in the last five seconds, there are no widespread outages. \n\nNext, enter your town/area and “power outage” in the search, and sort by Latest. What you’ll usually see are several mentions of the power being out from your area. You may have to adjust the terms. Communities all have unique ways of expressing themselves by name. \n\nWhen you see that all or most the latest tweets about power outages are coming from your area, you can be assured the rest of the world is up and running.", "270" ], [ "CNN just ran this and sourced the owner of the video. So I searched them on Twitter and found the post. Somehow it has almost no RT or comment activity. \n\nThe people in the vid are obviously unhinged as they go after the Congressman. But interestingly, it also appears to be yet another example of some of the most vocal Trumplicans being Russian or of Russian descent.\n\nEdit to add- Thanks for asking for more context to this event. [Found this very detailed account at the *Orange County Register*](_URL_0_)", "337" ], [ "A quote from <PERSON> of Reuters which I think is extremely important:\n\n > Intentional or not, the acting attorney general's absence at the Capitol siege briefing does send a message.\n\nIt would appear...and I hope it’s true, because some observers on Twitter have not been kind to <PERSON> previous to this...these guys may have just decided to step up and take back their autonomy.", "906" ], [ "I’m dying to ask these folks this: “Why wouldn’t the DOJ just begin a three-year process of stacking super secret sealed indictments in the PACER system? Why were they brave enough to stand in front of Americans and call these crimes and these criminals out?”\n\nI mean, is it possible that super secret 3 year-old PACER indictments by the hundreds of thousands aren’t an actual thing?", "776" ], [ "This letter should unquestionably emit two separate emotions. It’s absolutely tragic that the Trump Presidency has necessitated our military being forced to say they won’t back a coup. \n\nBut this letter should invoke a wonderful feeling of pride and confidence also. Think of the temptations and the promises of having the run of “the entire kingdom” that so many have succumbed to across history. These leaders weren’t moved. These leaders learned their civics. And *their pride in American law and principles were real.*\n\nTragically, followers of Qanon lost their way, and in the process, most of them are still at this moment praying for a <PERSON> coup, leading to a <PERSON> dynasty. How can we get them back from this? I don’t have the answer. \n\nBut maybe now they will at least face that there is no “secret special unit” that can take over America. The Joint Chiefs will put down any and all aggression against the United States, most assuredly and most violently. \n\n[Here’s NPR’s story on the JCOS letter.](_URL_2_)\n\nRelevant parts here:\n\n > The U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff reminded American forces Tuesday of their oath to defend the Constitution following the attacks on the Capitol building last week.\nThe letter was addressed to The Joint Force, which is made up of about 1.3 million active duty service members and more than 811,000 National Guard and reservists — all of whom swore an oath to \"Support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.\" The oath has stood since America's founding nearly 250 years ago.\n\n > ”The violent riot in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, 2021, was a direct assault on the U.S. Congress, the Capitol building, and our Constitutional process,\" the memorandum said. \"We witnessed actions inside the Capitol building that were inconsistent with the rule of law. The rights of freedom of speech and assembly do not give anyone the right to resort to violence, sedition and insurrection.\"\n\n > The Joint Chiefs emphasized in the letter that President-elect <PERSON> will be inaugurated on Jan. 20, becoming the 46th Commander in Chief, and any acts to disrupt the constitutional process not only violate military values, but the law.\n\nEdit- Added the corrected link for the NPR story.\nThanks for the awards everyone, much appreciated and so glad to see how well this was received. It’s all credit to our military leaders.\n\nEdit 2- People are asking for even more proof that this *really* came from the JCOS. Here’s more sauce:\n\n[The official website at _URL_1_](_URL_0_)\n\n[A tweet from the 780th Military Intelligence Brigade.](_URL_3_) I would surmise those folks are getting tired of hearing that the foolishness of Qanon has anything whatsoever to do with Military Intelligence.", "609" ], [ "I honestly believe if five or ten million people would post this on Facebook, it would open lots of eyes. No commentary, just the letter. \n\nThe importance of this letter can’t be overstated. These guys just publicly told Q people, “Nope, we are not in on it. If there’s a conspiracy against America, it’s not with the military.”\n\nPlus, the Joint Chiefs are telling all active military and all retired that can still lose their pensions that they better stay out of this.", "920" ], [ "That’s incredible, I just don’t know what’s it’s going to take. I feel like what we’re going to see in the 20th are claims of <PERSON> being “inaugurated” at an undisclosed location, and now all the generals know he’s still in office, they can begin to slaughter everyone Qanon doesn’t like. \n\nSomething like that is surely coming, because the people leading these people around by their fee-fees can’t possibly stop the grift.", "906" ], [ "Well, let’s be clear. Q isn’t claiming anything, and hasn’t for weeks. And even when Q was doing a little posting over 2020, the great prophet had nothing of consequence to say. \n\nQ “drops” since sometime in 2019 have been largely links to tweets and EpochRealTrue BreeebartTreehouse or some such. \n\nThe Q movement has left Qanon behind. They now follow various and sundry grifters, usually lighting on whichever one is telling the most outrageous stories for the moment.\n\nBut yep, what you said is exactly what the Q followers will say.", "977" ], [ "I agree with the first commenter that all substantial explanations of the <PERSON> come back to <PERSON>. \n\nThis is not a reframing based on hindsight. We were saying some version of this at TMOR in November of 2017. And frankly, you can probably find plenty saying this in 2016 about the Pizzagate myth that gave birth to the.Q movement. \n\n(Some believe <PERSON> was invented to confuse the public due to fear of some past <PERSON> crime being released. The pee tape is the obvious first guess. There’s no way to know if this is the case, or if it just organically arose from the larp world of 4ch.)\n\n<PERSON>’s story may ultimately be told apart from Pizzagate, but that would be a mistake, whether they shared common larpers (or foreign governments or campaign staff) or not. (Likely not, those reportedly there is evidence of Russian promotion that played a part in the growth of both of these.)\n\nI think the difference between the two is purely down to the successful mainstreaming of Qanon. Early on, this was done at Reddit and Infowars, among other sites. \n\nThis was a very intentional expansion beyond the usual <PERSON> conspiranauts. Most people who follow this know who the three people are that combined to promote Q, whether they actually started it or not. \n\nBut all that aside, without the Cult of Trump, the Qult of Q never happens. Literal worship at MAGA rallies, the accompanying merchandise sales, the *lock her up* chants, these were already a reality. Qanon was just a way to capture the most rabid of them. \n\nOne analogy might be Star Wars figurines. The company that sold those didn’t write or produce the movie. But it was an offshoot that guaranteed a new buying audience that the toy company didn’t have previously. And in return, there are dividends for the filmmaker, both monetary and in solidifying the fan base. \n\n<PERSON> and the <PERSON> campaign would be the filmmaker in the analogy. And the outcome is what we see in Georgia...<PERSON> has transcended the Party. Without the base of Qult members that worship him, no way he’s able to be a raving lunatic and not get swatted down by Republican leadership.", "220" ], [ "Yeah, all these things listed are consistent with one or other of the Q sects. Others, like the politico sect, pretend the New Age people don’t exist, and only talk about FISA warrants and how many votes <PERSON> got in Georgia. \n\nThese sects don’t speak to each other, and constantly fight on <PERSON> and <PERSON>, but they are all faithful to drive cross country to a MAGA rally. \n\nWe generally call the Qanon movement “The Unified Conspiracy Theory”. The only ones they haven’t hijacked are the non-supernatural ones involving the current President. (Because there was a perfectly good explanation for <PERSON> taking all that money from foreign governments.)\n\nThe best way to think about the UTC is the “Q map”. Do a search of that term at r/Qult_Headquarters and you should find multiple versions of the “map”. It’s basically an amalgamated collection of Coast-to-Coast Radio terms with a few lines randomly drawn between them. \n\nIt serves as a nice spectrum of multiple choice hysteria, and allows the Q follower to pick all the ones they like. From the modern earthly, like <PERSON> and 9/11, to the ancient, like the Illuminat and Knights Templar, to the otherworldly, like the Nephilium and the child’s blood fountain of youth. \n\nGood times.", "827" ], [ "I’ve seen them describe it in multiple ways. I’d say the most common isn’t so much getting rich as canceling their debts, ending the Fed and returning to the gold standard. I haven’t seen a lot of talk about getting income, because <PERSON>, a Democrat, was known for that. So that would by definition make it bad. \n\nFor me the most important learning point is that they seems to see the truth is in the middle when it comes to economics. Capitalism has a very important place, but so do collective efforts.\n\nBut they wouldn’t admit the latter for the world, so instead they have to frame it as Earthly Daddy in a <PERSON> role stealing from the pedovores and giving to the Qultists.", "580" ], [ "Suspended at *Parler*? Is that even a thing, even for a bloviating bloodlusty bloke like <PERSON>?\n\nI don’t know about a pivot, unless you mean moving to a focus on the governors. For a central message, he’s one of many begging the minions to start some form of violence for weeks. And I don’t read this latest central theme in all caps any differently.", "140" ], [ "> Yes in psycohistory this is all covered in the math.\n\nI would comment on this sentence, but I couldn’t even begin to guess what the <PERSON> thinks he’s trying to say. \n\n > They think they can use media social inertia to over whelm 75%+ of the populations voice....\n\nThis is my current leader in the clubhouse for the never-ending Cognitive Dissonance Sweepstakes.\n\nThese people are convinced Georgia doesn’t know the vote count after they’ve *actually counted* the votes three times now. But they’re convinced they have a perfect handle on <PERSON>’s vote percentage through pure cult-level invention. \n\nIf it was me, I would’ve at least made myself look fair-minded and given my God Emperor like 55%. I’d love to the ask this guy to tell us the last two-candidate Presidential race in America where the winner got 75% of the vote. \n\nAnd the last one who got 50% after a quarter million extra people died on his watch and tens of millions turned to unemployment lines.", "92" ], [ "> MSM refuses to show the hearings\n\nI’m gonna have me a hearing at the Best Western tomorrow, and I can’t get the damn networks to cover it either. \n\nMy neighbor signed a swored After <PERSON> that my other neighbor heard from her aunt’s hairdresser’s gardener’s girlfriend that <PERSON> broke into my house and replaced everything in it with an exact replica.", "765" ], [ "It’s not just that it “won’t work”. Slicing out the few falsifiable things that <PERSON> has said still leaves 4500 other posts in which he said absolutely nothing. \n\nAll the falsifiable predictions that weren’t already widely reported in the media have been, guess what? False. \n\nBut a <PERSON> somehow believes the other 4500 meaningless links and lists of buzzwords contains major groundbreaking “truth”. Qanon is cold reading that requires hindsight to work. \n\nSo I could list basically every name in <PERSON>’s new Cabinet, add some big names in business, sports and media, plus a dozens of numbers. And before long, stories will come out in the actual news, sufficient to which, a stupid person could be convinced that I was a genius. \n\nYou can find some of <PERSON>’s worst falsifiable blunders [on this Twitter thread by @PokerPolitics.](_URL_0_) But the reason it rarely works to convince them is because of the cold reading principle. They are absolutely convinced Q is omniscient, so every time stamp and capitalization must surely “mean something”.", "969" ], [ "That’s 50,000 sub members, not 5000. And 1400 new members this week alone. \n\nAgree with the other commenter that it can’t be quantified. All we can do is monitor the particular things they’re caring about at any given time and raise awareness at the more dangerous ones. \n\nThe ones who focus on “lizard people”, well that’s nothing new and no harm, no foul. But the ones who want to kill other Americans, or who get online every day trying to talk their most vulnerable and disturbed followers to do so...those need constant monitoring and exposing.", "633" ], [ "Yep, we have definitely not nearly reached the critical mass of crazy yet. Not from <PERSON>, not from the sycophant politicians trying to inherit his cult, and not from *THE Qult*.\n\nThere has been a tiny reason for hope lately, as even a couple of the Qultists on my FB are already starting in with <PERSON> fear-mongering. People who wouldn’t have been able to name three Cabinet positions five years ago are suddenly <PERSON> in their own mind. \n\nBut that’s still a positive, because it exposes their pretense that “<PERSON> won”. I figure if they really thought <PERSON> was gonna stay in office, they wouldn’t be so hysterical about who <PERSON> might name to head the Commission on Tennis Shoes for the Aged.", "140" ], [ "One more question, just curious. Was she watching on streaming or network? Just wondering if someone purposely put that ep on tv or if it was just pure coincidence. \n\nGlad to hear she’s not into Q. I’d like to see this little clip posted at Twitter and other places and have Q’s see it so they’ll know <PERSON> and <PERSON> or whoever didn’t suddenly get some great revelation. Whoever is putting it out there totally stole it.", "759" ], [ "Very well said. I mentioned to someone last night that the PB message to Q people right now is very simple: “Don’t you feel silly now for Trusting the Plan”? Haven’t you figured out now that you need to be *part of our plan*?”\n\nThey are gigging these folks into action by shaming them about one of Q’s most popular refrains. Anybody who can’t see the disturbing potential for this tactic, as they dismiss and insult and name call, is part of the problem right now.", "98" ], [ "> Nobody's Q parents are going to be talked out of it by their own children, ever. Parents don't view their children as peers, they view them as children.\n\nI assume you are meaning to say *small or very young* children here? Otherwise this is the very kind of overgeneralized comment the OP is warning against. \n\nIn many many families, once a child reaches an age that they can communicate maturely, almost nobody has more influence on a parent than their children. And this continues all the way, from the child’s high school and college years, and continues through the parent’s very senior years. \n\n(And frankly, even at very young ages, how many films have as a plot device a child’s opinion of their single parent’s dates? Children have enormous influence in many, if not the vast majority, of households. I’m sad for those who don’t enjoy that dynamic.)", "405" ], [ "> There really are hardly any families where it works like that.\n\nYou made my point that the comment is an overgeneralization, so there’s no reason to further debate what the percentage is. I can only add that I’m thankful to have an entire extended family where the kids are where you go if the parent needs convincing of something. \n\nIn families where this isn’t the case, I always wonder who exactly takes the car keys from an aging person who doesn’t need to drive anymore. Almost every instance of this I’ve ever known of this difficult conversation, it fell to the child or the grandchild. \n\nThe other few instances came from an insurance agent. Which is quite sad.", "405" ], [ "Be very intentional. Start by writing down everything you want out of life. When you’ve filled up a page, go through them all again, dividing each into three categories:\n\nHigh Priority: The fewer the better, because these are the ones you will pursue until your last day. \n\nMedium and Low Priority: Delete the lowest that are just “would be nice” if they will get in the way of the High Priorities. \n\nThen, draw a matrix. An X-axis and a Y-axis. Vertical line is labeled Easy to Achieve at the top, Hard at the bottom. The Y axis is Expensive on the left and Inexpensive on the right. \n\nNow plot each of the high and medium priorities. If there are things that fit in Easy and Inexpensive, do one of them tomorrow. You’ll enjoy the success of it. Then get to work on the rest of the list.", "306" ], [ "The main issue is the word “believe”. The conspiracy community always starts with factual, unconnected stories, and guess where they get those stories? The *mainstream media* they hate so much. \n\nThen they develop a *belief*, then they start stringing unrelated stories and fables and grainy photos together to match that preconceived *belief*.\n\n<PERSON> is a good example. <PERSON> of the *Miami Herald* is the reason people know about <PERSON>. He was long convicted before Qanon decided the story could be built into the Pizzagate myth, and it worked like a charm. \n\nHere’s the scoop on Qanon:\n\nQanon never once successfully predicted a single thing in any falsifiable comment they ever “dropped”. And Qanon never shared a single piece of information that wasn’t already available in the public realm. Namely government websites and the *mainstream media*.", "969" ], [ "I see antivax comments, as well as claims of autism and requests for dating advice to get girls. I don’t see any mention of being trans. This post is contrary to your claims enough, and your post is low effort enough, that I’m removing it. If I’ve missed comments where you’ve been speaking up against the Qult since 2019, reply with it here and we’ll reconsider.", "847" ], [ "And we 100% support you and anyone who gets out. But you also need to understand we’re a sub that is very susceptible to trolling. \n\nI would suggest you get to know u/d-_-bored-_-b our moderator and a notable ex-Q who has been the subject of articles and TV interviews on at least three continents. \n\nHe hosts a discord for XQ people, and I’m certain you will be welcome. Once you get to know each other, all Bored has to do is say the word, and we will happily host your AMA in a few weeks time.", "883" ], [ "We’re growing very fast. I see you found us from a Twitter comment. We’re also on the Q wiki page and many media outlets. That’s both good and bad, as we’re not only getting many more people here for the right reasons, but also the opposite. \n\nWe’re working to keep out the trolling, and soon enough they’ll lose interest. But honestly the people hurting for real, in real life, will be finding us for a long time to come. Even if all mention of Q ended today, and it’s definitely not going to, we’ll be seeing the fallout for years from this thing.", "633" ], [ "That’s pretty much the large and small of it. <PERSON> of NBC interviewed two of the early larpers. You can probably search for that story from around 2019.\n\nBut it’s really unimportant who all was in on it early. The small group who moved it to 8ch and then promoted the heck out of it on their platforms are the ones that made it break out. \n\nEverybody else at 4ch ridiculed them out of the building. And <PERSON> could see the potential to drive clicks to his site for something other than porn. So a partnership was born. \n\nThe thing most people don’t really understand is that 4ch Q was nothing. It arguably got less discussion than FBIAnon. It was post-move to 8ch when everything happened, other than the first few famously failed arrests and police state posts.", "452" ], [ "One interesting thing about the Q movement of early 2021 is that the “big players” have changed completely. \n\nMost all the people we’ve been talking about for over three years have either walked off or been forgotten, and the new wave of Qultists are following people like <PERSON>, <PERSON>, and <PERSON>. People who probably know less about Q than they do. \n\nQultists had never heard of <PERSON> before November, and he’d probably never heard of them. Of course that didn’t stop him from taking over the leadership role when deplatforming caused a gaping gulf in celebrity Q Whisperers.", "419" ], [ "<PERSON> is a fun story. I don’t think anybody in the states had ever heard of him. Suddenly when everyone started getting banned and it was rumored <PERSON> would go dark, <PERSON> posted <PERSON>’ website and said something like “This guy knows what happening”.\n\nSo what “this guy” did was give a play-by-play of literal tanks crossing the bridges in DC and saying the “war” had begun...for three or four *straight nights*.\n\nQultists were amazed nobody else knew about this war. Of course a quick search of Twitter for Newest Comments would tell you whether there’s a war in under two minutes. \n\nAnyway, the <PERSON> was thrilled. Then somebody did a single Google search. Turns out <PERSON> was semi-famous for being a former elected official in the UK who believed he had sex with an alien in his mother’s womb. \n\nHe’s also known for a bunch of other alien nonsense. But some Qultists are still watching his YT every day.", "25" ] ]
224
[ 14229, 16060, 14278, 13147, 20577, 2581, 10575, 17797, 19580, 14653, 19064, 11898, 21802, 17150, 25233, 18233, 11875, 20966, 7459, 2889, 20806, 17944, 1936, 12651, 15275, 7654, 1921, 494, 22046, 914, 21319, 3743, 7490, 21508, 10532, 6786, 5754, 2688, 6767, 13248, 4018, 2778, 13396, 15911, 17601, 24304, 16168, 23971, 18542, 7335, 14373, 17263, 6620, 11010, 23678, 5539, 18587, 16946, 16458, 12606, 15806, 23125, 20887, 1558, 21655, 23842, 14916, 5501, 3192, 464, 8467, 5363, 22455, 5127, 19208, 3093, 8657, 25103, 11356, 20822, 7587, 22693, 12213, 3020, 3499, 9739, 13916, 8426, 11287, 1129, 4528, 11350, 4922, 2259, 22662, 24740, 4523, 9329, 10084, 23010, 586, 4288, 22113, 12980, 13796, 3803, 9213, 4832, 2294, 8336, 4049, 21824, 24455, 10525, 1018, 22769, 12701, 9357, 21698, 4815, 25176, 10083, 24437, 606, 22007, 2286, 21132, 10394, 8531, 20228, 6409, 5834, 21693, 8807, 15096, 23367, 12215, 6024, 2204, 6759, 3641, 10978, 2199, 19795, 2869, 1447, 10341, 24885, 14397, 18525, 18967, 3532, 13618, 5249, 11775, 20135, 22873, 17918, 24359, 2509, 10493, 12723, 22599, 22834, 3965, 6551, 22687, 25363, 6315, 4597, 3533, 12952, 14848, 1399, 3775, 2733, 6048, 20132, 12785, 11927, 4804, 3840, 12075, 6250, 11423, 8535, 441, 9960, 9690, 18812, 2764, 13072, 3899, 9034, 20488, 12119, 9521, 17999, 8661, 7328, 7655, 817, 12972, 20725, 9033, 3510, 2547, 14069, 6273, 16779, 3781, 22459, 16985, 19987, 16421, 2307, 21845, 12695, 4426, 15091, 23511, 16686, 2182, 17286, 5674, 17660, 15885, 13656, 24453, 20044, 14788, 20868, 11648, 1971, 19258, 16374, 5163, 20770, 18380, 18550, 20837, 24425, 9162, 17954, 12084, 13711, 4498, 1396, 13238, 4945, 1597, 9369, 2322, 24880, 3789, 6030, 8743, 9779, 18267, 17933, 17615, 8313, 2013, 6212, 4987, 15416, 217, 18318, 20186, 23512, 8735, 14931, 16113, 9996, 16882, 10174, 4570, 5189, 14273, 5073, 18122, 22457, 9152, 16522, 8700, 22075, 11763, 11238, 18243, 11785, 11756, 2059, 461, 2139, 14560, 5614, 4616, 21910, 12078, 24771, 23173, 17680, 3277, 25111, 6346, 24380, 22263, 5490, 565, 11389, 15740, 3529, 6856, 16092, 3417, 24866, 21948, 20528, 330, 11255, 22727, 21129, 25386, 14937, 14289, 1699, 7701, 1464, 22537, 20429, 13416, 12059, 11638, 9006, 19038, 23806, 9618, 22890, 16087, 22477, 24937, 2546, 15823, 11456, 980, 3280, 2323, 18223, 5103, 815, 13769, 18564, 24890, 11557, 3581, 22751, 6945, 14375, 17675, 19708, 17130, 15846, 23708, 7440, 22504, 19714, 16979, 1368, 21401, 2914, 6255, 12998, 5989, 6317, 4307, 21396, 6178, 17625, 3210, 7543, 9356, 19217, 25267, 12722, 17480, 12023, 21221, 17327, 9115, 8849, 12850, 3847, 9645, 14868, 10077, 22321, 21311, 406, 20139, 11463, 14307, 6146, 19377, 12874, 9892, 24362, 22590, 6689, 1393, 19625, 17370, 10355, 24171, 14315, 17556, 811, 1125, 17997, 16748, 6618, 13063, 11236, 15757, 22302, 21019, 9388, 465, 11034, 12957, 21510, 1922, 11202, 5921, 1128, 25531, 18796, 16934, 21656, 66, 22627, 332, 18828, 19610, 18416, 8294, 6575, 19709, 20394, 12763, 9784, 10857, 16251, 14360, 3215, 25143, 17756, 3924, 2641, 2415, 1933, 4623, 12385, 11485, 2062, 1139, 6429, 18509, 12573, 9466, 12296, 15857, 16070, 14136, 20165, 2079, 17628, 1670, 3469, 22273, 10388, 17000, 9027, 10156, 18059, 12035, 5179, 22935, 1029, 23810, 16225, 5632, 11046, 9396, 24373, 16516, 2008, 22469, 1160, 22921 ]