archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
True
s73v3r
null
>but that doesn't mean that it created a job Do you think that the design company didn't have to hire people to manage production? Or sales? Or designers to create new designs?
null
0
1316375166
False
0
c2kt4x2
t3_khvyw
null
t1_c2kt4x2
t1_c2kk08p
null
1427616349
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
s73v3r
null
>There is no provision that will stop the incompetent dumbasses from the Patent Office from granting patents on which the existence of prior art is common knowledge. If you don't know about the existence of the prior art, then you can't really rule on it. And part of the problem is that the patent office can't afford to hire people with high levels of industry experience, so many of those things aren't known about at the time. The types of people that actually would be able to properly evaluate patents in their fields are very expensive.
null
0
1316375288
False
0
c2kt5fv
t3_khvyw
null
t1_c2kt5fv
t1_c2kizis
null
1427616356
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
warmfuzzykitten
null
Even if iOS had a terminal app and provided open access to all data on the phone in some sort of directory simulation, the data themselves wouldn't be a good match for command line tools, which only work well on text files. The world has moved on; the *nix command line has stayed behind. Programmers like it because programmers work mostly with text files. The rest of the world, not.
null
0
1316375367
False
0
c2kt5ra
t3_kgqnz
null
t1_c2kt5ra
t3_kgqnz
null
1427616360
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ibisum
null
Sweet! I'm going to get a new one, then.. Mine is decades old.
null
0
1316375396
False
0
c2kt5vn
t3_kj1na
null
t1_c2kt5vn
t1_c2kraoi
null
1427616362
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mistralol
null
I know what you mean. However in c# and the .net framework it is possible to pretty much write an application without writing a single loop over the data returned from the database. The gridview / repeater are really useful for that sort of stuff :)
null
0
1316375503
False
0
c2kt6c2
t3_ki83r
null
t1_c2kt6c2
t1_c2ks3wo
null
1427616372
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ErstwhileRockstar
null
Fortunately AOP has become a thing of the past. The idea that you write half-finished programs that are beefed up with 'aspects' is bizarre. At least in retrospect.
null
0
1316375593
False
0
c2kt6pd
t3_kjiii
null
t1_c2kt6pd
t3_kjiii
null
1427616376
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
misterkrad
null
if you took the time to off-line compress the entire database into one large solid rar - what would the gains be? (7-zip can do solid rar - try the 64 bit version with 72 gigs of ram)? I think the best implementation would be a combination of off-line compression using gobs of ram/cpu and updates using no-compression or light compression to perhaps another database or set of files that get re-integrated once a night. Does anyone have any good articles on sql server 2008R2/2011 compression for comparison?
null
0
1316375719
False
0
c2kt79q
t3_kjete
null
t1_c2kt79q
t3_kjete
null
1427616381
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ethraax
null
I strongly disagree. The problem with static languages (and I love static languages a hell of a lot more than dynamic ones) is that changes are often made to the *interface* of a class, which requires changing things in the header, the class description, and each call site. This is not due to "verbosity", but due to the fact that static languages force all these things to match, whereas dynamic languages are far more relaxed.
null
0
1316375804
False
0
c2kt7mu
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2kt7mu
t1_c2kt2m8
null
1427616386
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MaikB
null
I disagree. Lets say you changed your mind half way and start rewriting code. In a dynamic language you can start running the rewritten parts without adapting others. If the execution hits invalid code you just get an error message and know where to work next. In a static language the compiler will say: NO, I can't compile and/or link this.
null
0
1316375994
False
0
c2kt8g9
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2kt8g9
t1_c2kt2m8
null
1427616395
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ironykarl
null
Yessir, [the deregulation of airlines](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airline_Deregulation_Act) and [trucking](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_Carrier_Act_of_1980) in the US are both recent examples which involved enabling market entry and led to obvious price decreases. There're countless examples of national industries (as in government protected and subsidized industries) becoming majorly inefficient and expensive producers of very bad products. Indian's economy from (roughly) the 1950s onward is a fantastic example. If you're wondering _why_, just imagine how hard you would work for gains _if you didn't have to._ Sensible entities will tend to reduce the amount of effort they have to put forth to get the results they want. Not letting people enter the market freely, tinker, take risks, and acrue capital around basic concepts makes things radically easier for the established market leaders.
null
0
1316376122
False
0
c2kt90v
t3_khvyw
null
t1_c2kt90v
t1_c2kq1xj
null
1427616402
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
greyfade
null
It might be *more* acceptable, but I'm not convinced the tradeoff is ultimately worth it. The thing with trade secrets is that they don't last forever. Eventually some widget gets reverse-engineered, or someone comes up with the same idea independently - it'll come out into the Public Domain eventually, why force it? Trade secrets give you the same protection as a patent, for a natural span of time, just without the forced disclosure. I just can't reconcile the arbitrary time period that a patent sets where that knowledge is *available but inaccessible* with the Constitutional charge to Congress that it must "Promote the Progress of Sciences and of the Useful Arts." It doesn't do that when the world is forced to sit on their hands for 15-20 years while they wait for this knowledge to pass into the Public Domain.
null
0
1316376438
False
0
c2ktaca
t3_khvyw
null
t1_c2ktaca
t1_c2kt18n
null
1427616420
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Slavigula
null
I think she's into anal.... yeah, definitely...
null
0
1316376523
False
0
c2ktaor
t3_kj1na
null
t1_c2ktaor
t3_kj1na
null
1427616425
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
neitz
null
I don't think it was because Haskell is not the right choice for mainstream, but rather that it would have a lot harder time mapping to the .NET framework. The .NET framework was designed with mutability and side-effects all over the place and this would not translate well to Haskell which strives for pushing these things only to the top most layers.
null
0
1316376643
False
0
c2ktb6z
t3_kii9z
null
t1_c2ktb6z
t1_c2kozoj
null
1427616431
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
neitz
null
*largest
null
0
1316376769
False
0
c2ktbnx
t3_kii9z
null
t1_c2ktbnx
t1_c2kjl0c
null
1427616437
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Well, using XML and being like Swing is not the only two options. One could also have a good Java API; for example, it could be type safe and uncomplicated.
null
0
1316376957
False
0
c2ktcfi
t3_kje6b
null
t1_c2ktcfi
t1_c2krb8n
null
1427616447
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
wolf550e
null
LZ77 is just sliding window de-duplication. It transforms an array of bytes into an array of two types: literal bytes and (offset,length) pairs which are references to bytes that previously appeared and the decoder has already seen and can copy from the output buffer. Also, by using a length that is greater than the offset, it provides run length encoding. Without a guarantee of a maximum offset, the decoder must keep all the output in a buffer in order to be sure it is able to decompress the data (if, for example, it suddenly encounters a pair that says (offset=1GB, length=100bytes) and it needs to repeat 100 bytes from 1GB ago, it must be able to access what it outputted 1GB ago. Because this is impractical, there is a limit either in the spec or in the header of the compressed stream, so the decompresser can allocate a sufficient buffer (or error out). Limiting offset to 16bits is practical. Nowadays, archival compressors use much larger windows. Deflate is LZ77 with an encoding to transmit both the literals and the offset-length pairs using huffman codes. It uses Russian dolls style to first transmit the huffman tables you're going to need to decode the data, themselves compressed with huffman coding using clever static tables and RLE specified in the spec. It uses two tables: one for literals and lengths of offset-length pairs and another only for offsets of offset-length pairs. Because offsets appear only after lengths, bitcodes of offsets and literals may overlap without being ambiguous. It allows to transmit incompressible data with little overhead. Compression windows are limited to 16bits, but it's streaming. If you want independently decompressible chunks, you must flush every time you make a reset point (and record the offset in the compressed data). You can use any algorithm and data structures to turn input byte array into a series of minimal length literals and back-references (including slow code that produces the absolutely shortest such description for any given input) and then use the deflate encoding to transmit it. Minimal length of reference is 3, max is 258 (IIRC). About NTFS not compressing using chunks larger than 64k: probably because (1) its encoding only allows 16bit long back offsets and because (2) in case of random access, NTFS would need to read from disk and decompress a big chunk of data before it can return a single record. Why doesn't NTFS pack compressed data tighter in the file, leaving on average one half empty 4kb block per compressed chunk? Because tail packing would make the code that maps logical offset in file to physical block on disk too complicated. ReiserFSv3 had tail packing and it was problematic. For example, you didn't know how much free space the disk had. I have a toy LZ77 compressor in python2: https://github.com/zeevt/csnappy/blob/16792d2f5a7793b2559476c2eeec92a23284bbd7/pysnappy_compress.py It compresses independent blocks, not a true sliding window. It has two different LZ77 routines, one that uses chaining and unlimited memory (well, you can calculate worst case scenario for any length of input) and one that uses Snappy's hashtable with no chaining. The code is short and you can compare the outputs. Insert print statements to debug...
null
0
1316376964
True
0
c2ktcgg
t3_kjete
null
t1_c2ktcgg
t1_c2kslq9
null
1427616448
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
stridera
null
I know what you mean. After programming for so long, I'm sometime amazed that people don't know what a for loop is or something similar. Thanks for the tips. I'll look into it.
null
0
1316377245
False
0
c2ktdne
t3_kj1na
null
t1_c2ktdne
t1_c2kpwr4
null
1427616464
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
player2
null
The first two weren't even on your radar until C# was released. Stop trolling.
null
0
1316377277
False
0
c2ktds1
t3_kjf91
null
t1_c2ktds1
t1_c2ksgkk
null
1427616466
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Zarutian
null
Well, MicroSoft has the propensity to say that they will do something and commit to it longterm but then turn around and cancel any such commitments. I wager that the reason for this is the rampant "empire" building in the office politics and inter-departmental rivaly internal to MicroSoft. I think the world would be better of if MicroSoft was split into many smaller companies. Then they would have no choice but to agree on public open standards.
null
0
1316377296
False
0
c2ktduo
t3_kip3s
null
t1_c2ktduo
t1_c2kjtp7
null
1427616467
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
el_isma
null
I've found this Wikipedia article to be a good introduction to C++11: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B11 As well as this one from Stroustrup: http://www.research.att.com/~bs/what-is-2009.pdf
null
0
1316377344
False
0
c2kte1o
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2kte1o
t3_kjja4
null
1427616469
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Durinthal
null
I never said I'm telling people to avoid Macs. For some people they're great, just don't expect me to help when they break.
null
0
1316377411
False
0
c2ktebp
t3_kjhvo
null
t1_c2ktebp
t1_c2krzzk
null
1427616473
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sltkr
null
This has been realized to some extend. For example, ARM's [Jazelle](http://www.arm.com/products/processors/technologies/jazelle.php) VM moved interpretation of Java bytecode to the processor (basically allowing the processor run bytecode natively). The reason it hasn't really caught on is that (1) the ARM system is completely proprietary and platform dependant and (2) that good JIT compilation can beat even the most efficient hardware interpreters.
null
0
1316377652
False
0
c2ktf9m
t3_kjf91
null
t1_c2ktf9m
t1_c2kqthx
null
1427616485
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
neitz
null
Not really. In Haskell for instance I can load whichever modules I am working with into GHCI and modules that use that module are not compiled/loaded. It is a great environment for rapid prototyping. Again, its really verbosity (especially bad in C++ with header files and the like), and highly coupled software that is the culprit.
null
0
1316377676
False
0
c2ktfd3
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktfd3
t1_c2kt7mu
null
1427616491
21
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
__j_random_hacker
null
I think a better approach would be to write an adapter class that wraps the graph node class and presents the correct interface. I.e. the graph node adaptor class contains a graph node object, and for every method required by the interface, the adaptor class contains a method of that name and signature that simply forwards to the corresponding method on the contained object. Then you could make the adaptor class have a `Less()` method that forwards to `Smaller()`.
null
0
1316377717
False
0
c2ktfj7
t3_kikut
null
t1_c2ktfj7
t1_c2krzt9
null
1427616488
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Rubuler
null
Sure is September 15th in here.
null
0
1316377861
False
0
c2ktg66
t3_kjrve
null
t1_c2ktg66
t3_kjrve
null
1427616497
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
That depends on the domain it's used for and what your definition of engineering is. One definition states the use of rigorous mathematics and testing to back up assumptions made by the engineers. I would say that formally modeled software systems fit this definition. Most day to day software engineering is probably more like rigorous craftsmanship.
null
0
1316377977
False
0
c2ktgn6
t3_kjhvo
null
t1_c2ktgn6
t1_c2ksky2
null
1427616502
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dnew
null
I think where you store the adaptor depends more on what code you have control over yourself. Plus, I think you'd just write a new method that works on the graph node, if I remember my Go properly. I interpreted the intention of that line as "you sometimes need to write code to change what it accepts" sometimes, because trying to sound-byte exactly which seam of your program should implement that adaptor isn't going to be effective.
null
0
1316378092
False
0
c2kth3z
t3_kikut
null
t1_c2kth3z
t1_c2ktfj7
null
1427616509
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
I often do prototypes in Python when developing engineering programs that need special scientific and mathematics functions. I use SciPy for the Python development and later, if I need more performance, I migrate it to C using the Gnu scientific library. However I much prefer plain C over C++. I used to do a lot of development in C++, but then I found that C lets me develop in a quicker and easier manner. These days I only use C++ for a few programs, mostly if I use a GUI, like Qt, that's C++. The reason C is better for me is that it lets one develop interfaces gradually. I start with one single source file with all the functions in it. As I refine my structure and add code I start splitting the functions over several modules. It's the flow of development that gives me the insight of what should go where. In C++ the definition of classes more or less freezes the API from the beginning. If I implement a function as a method of a class and later find that it would be more logical to implement it as a method of another class that refactoring is a bitch.
null
0
1316378194
False
0
c2kthhk
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2kthhk
t1_c2ksu3g
null
1427616515
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
velit
null
same thing with opera
null
0
1316378239
False
0
c2kthnf
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2kthnf
t1_c2kse00
null
1427616516
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
You don't know what programming is if you think that wasn't.
null
0
1316378258
False
0
c2kthq0
t3_kjhvo
null
t1_c2kthq0
t1_c2krxf1
null
1427616517
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
License + humongous titles + PGP key > article.
null
0
1316378572
False
0
c2ktiyw
t3_kjkxj
null
t1_c2ktiyw
t1_c2krtqy
null
1427616533
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
torvalder
null
> (Braces for downvotes) (Shakes fist)
null
0
1316378582
False
0
c2ktj00
t3_kjdt6
null
t1_c2ktj00
t1_c2kt4a8
null
1427616533
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kankeroo
null
Stories like this depress me a bit.
null
0
1316378650
False
0
c2ktja7
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2ktja7
t3_khf6j
null
1427616537
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316378660
False
0
c2ktjbe
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktjbe
t1_c2kthnf
null
1427616539
-20
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
wolf550e
null
Best source on compression I know: http://mattmahoney.net/dc/dce.html I remember him writing that he experimented with some version of PAQ and the arithmetic coder beat huffman coding by 10% or something like that. Can't find it now. Static huffman tables imply static distribution of symbols. If you really only want to compress English text, there are special case compressors that use dictionaries.
null
0
1316378676
False
0
c2ktjd6
t3_kjete
null
t1_c2ktjd6
t1_c2ksw2b
null
1427616539
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mpyne
null
In fairness it turns out that with modern computers that you almost invariably want to [use QVector instead of QList](http://marcmutz.wordpress.com/effective-qt/containers/), or better yet, use std::vector instead of QVector.
null
0
1316378682
False
0
c2ktje4
t3_kjebe
null
t1_c2ktje4
t1_c2kq8g1
null
1427616547
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
chengiz
null
Bit rich coming from someone who doesnt understand basic semantics.
null
0
1316378737
False
0
c2ktjme
t3_kjhvo
null
t1_c2ktjme
t1_c2kthq0
null
1427616542
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
jakkarth
null
> Some seem to think this reddit is for "links that programmers might find interesting or funny". No. It's for programming links. Programming. *Programming.* **Programming.**
null
0
1316378972
False
0
c2ktkkn
t3_kjrve
null
t1_c2ktkkn
t3_kjrve
null
1427616560
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bigniggerdicks
null
I am uncomfortable with '/b' in the corner of those slides.
null
0
1316379001
False
0
c2ktkp0
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktkp0
t3_kjja4
null
1427616560
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
yurigoul
null
That is the project he is working on: boiling water plus coffee is ice coffee. It will be the next major hit at Starbucks and the supermarkets will follow. Everyone will drink it. What could possibly go wrong?
null
0
1316379045
False
0
c2ktkw1
t3_kjhvo
null
t1_c2ktkw1
t1_c2ksz7x
null
1427616563
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
uriel
null
> if they just keep adding features that are generic (channels and slices are both generic types) Those two 'features' have been an essential part of the language from the start, they were not just added later on, and those features themselves are orthogonal, so I don't see how they harm orthogonality.
null
0
1316379300
False
0
c2ktlx0
t3_kikut
null
t1_c2ktlx0
t1_c2krmco
null
1427616571
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
> A broken data/time class http://joda-time.sourceforge.net/
null
0
1316379309
False
0
c2ktlyf
t3_kjf91
null
t1_c2ktlyf
t1_c2ksgkk
null
1427616572
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
shriek
null
>/b/ There. Feels so much better now.
null
0
1316379443
False
0
c2ktmjg
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktmjg
t1_c2ktkp0
null
1427616580
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
drysart
null
Visual J++ had events and delegates in 1998. I can't remember if it had special property syntax or not.
null
0
1316379540
False
0
c2ktmym
t3_kjf91
null
t1_c2ktmym
t1_c2ktds1
null
1427616585
15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
I couldn't get it to play in Firefox 6 but it somehow plays fine in IE9. I don't have Silverlight installed.
null
0
1316379653
False
0
c2ktng4
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktng4
t1_c2kse00
null
1427616591
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
inmatarian
null
My only gripe with QtConcurrent is that it uses the same thread pool as QThreadPool::instance(), so that you can easily run into a situation where you have tasks running that block for some reason and prevent other tasks from getting a shot at running. QThreadPool isn't immune from this, but it can be mitigated easily by creating a new QThreadPool instance, which will fire up its own qthreads rather than sharing.
null
0
1316379766
False
0
c2ktnwr
t3_kjebe
null
t1_c2ktnwr
t1_c2krxdg
null
1427616598
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MaikB
null
I rarely implement classes but just functions, which are implemented using some STL classes. OOP is way overused IMO. That said, I often implement things in C for maintainability. C just compiles and runs everywhere and most developers can make sense of a piece of C code. There is also trouble when using C++ code in plugins for proprietary host programs that themself use C++. I had matlab and abaqus segfault on me due to version mismatches between the C++ runtime libraries. I worked these problems out in these cases, but I don't feel comfortable to leave long living code behind that by default segfaults. Though it sure is a lot more verbose and error prone, at least for, to write something in C than in C++.
null
0
1316380065
True
0
c2ktp6h
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktp6h
t1_c2kthhk
null
1427616615
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316380105
True
0
c2ktpc7
t3_ki83r
null
t1_c2ktpc7
t1_c2klxw7
null
1427616617
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
I meant in relation to patents.
null
0
1316380123
False
0
c2ktpfj
t3_khvyw
null
t1_c2ktpfj
t1_c2kt90v
null
1427616618
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
Those are features I learned about in December of 1992 when my aunt gave me a copy of VB 2 for my birthday.
null
0
1316380156
False
0
c2ktpl0
t3_kjf91
null
t1_c2ktpl0
t1_c2ktds1
null
1427616620
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Sounds like you're really looking for electrical engineers or ECE majors. As I'm sure you found out, there's a large difference between the kind of close to the hardware programming you do and abstract, high level programming. I'm not sure it's reasonable to expect the average graduate to be able to do both.
null
0
1316380204
False
0
c2ktprp
t3_khkyd
null
t1_c2ktprp
t1_c2ksgav
null
1427616622
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
elperroborrachotoo
null
*Now* we've boarded the memory train.
null
0
1316380219
False
0
c2ktpu5
t3_kjf91
null
t1_c2ktpu5
t1_c2ktmym
null
1427616623
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316380253
False
0
c2ktpy2
t3_ki83r
null
t1_c2ktpy2
t1_c2klz5k
null
1427616624
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
J++ had support for COM so they must have done something for properties. Exactly what that was I'm not sure of.
null
0
1316380277
False
0
c2ktq13
t3_kjf91
null
t1_c2ktq13
t1_c2ktmym
null
1427616626
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
nemtrif
null
> a new Windows API (WinRT) that is entirely dependent on non-standard C++ The non-standard extensions are optional - you can write WinRT with standard C++ or even C.
null
0
1316380316
False
0
c2ktq7a
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktq7a
t1_c2krxvw
null
1427616628
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
Yea, and once they find a way to thread it through the standard API it is going to be great.
null
0
1316380321
False
0
c2ktq7y
t3_kjf91
null
t1_c2ktq7y
t1_c2ktlyf
null
1427616628
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sbrown123
null
Nice programming hack. A better and more useful solution would have been to get it to run in the Android environment (Java included). Then people could write apps in a different language but not lose the OS, apps, and functionality.
null
0
1316380426
False
0
c2ktqnz
t3_kjj9n
null
t1_c2ktqnz
t3_kjj9n
null
1427616634
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
klo8
null
Delphi had properties in 1995, at least according to Wikipedia.
null
0
1316380464
False
0
c2ktqtr
t3_kjf91
null
t1_c2ktqtr
t1_c2ktds1
null
1427616639
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tau-lepton
null
Danke
null
0
1316380487
False
0
c2ktqxb
t3_kfvm7
null
t1_c2ktqxb
t1_c2ksz30
null
1427616639
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
WalterBright
null
D templates have significantly more power than C++ templates, yet have a simpler syntax.
null
0
1316380489
False
0
c2ktqxm
t3_kikut
null
t1_c2ktqxm
t1_c2kry78
null
1427616639
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Doing programming with mathematical functions as the basis.
null
0
1316380532
False
0
c2ktr47
t3_kjkxj
null
t1_c2ktr47
t3_kjkxj
null
1427616640
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Why would you downvote for that? It's at the end of the article and has no effect on the readability of the article.
null
0
1316380547
False
0
c2ktr5q
t3_kjkxj
null
t1_c2ktr5q
t1_c2krtqy
null
1427616640
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
stkerr
null
It's obnoxious
null
0
1316380834
False
0
c2ktsby
t3_kjkxj
null
t1_c2ktsby
t1_c2ktr5q
null
1427616655
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
That has been my experience. For quick and dirty prototypes, dynamic typing doesn't offer me anything over a statically typed language and a dictionary. Take Ruby for example. I used to drool over the query syntax that was exposed for stuff like ActiveRecord. But now that I have LINQ I couldn't care less about Ruby. I have the same sort of elegant syntax plus I don't have to run tests to discover typos.
null
0
1316380997
False
0
c2ktt0f
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktt0f
t1_c2kt2m8
null
1427616667
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
davebrk
null
You shouldn't uninstall VS from the Add/Remove Programs. There's a separate program to uninstall it.
null
0
1316381086
False
0
c2kttd6
t3_khtuh
null
t1_c2kttd6
t1_c2kkd8o
null
1427616670
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
LiveOnSteak
null
My voodoo marbles say that you're full of shit. And I can trust my voodoo marbles, because they use complex chemical interactions, just like biology!
null
0
1316381094
False
0
c2ktte9
t3_kjhvo
null
t1_c2ktte9
t1_c2ksjn1
null
1427616670
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
That is a problem in C and C++ to be sure. (And objective-C if I'm not mistaken). In VB or C# you don't have headers to deal with. Most call sites simply use var/dim, so you don't have to change the types there either.
null
0
1316381162
False
0
c2kttne
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2kttne
t1_c2kt7mu
null
1427616672
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ssylvan
null
If you change the interface to a function, say, you better update the use sites even in a dynamic language. The only difference is that the compiler will point out all of the places you need to update in one case, whereas in the other you get runtime crashes. If you have type inference (so that changes that don't modify *how* something is used won't require changes at the use-sites), then there's really no benefit to dynamic languages in this respect.
null
0
1316381201
False
0
c2kttt7
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2kttt7
t1_c2kt7mu
null
1427616676
22
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mkantor
null
I'm just talking about the "model" part of [MVC](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller). I usually like my MVC frameworks to have an inheritance tree where the ORM class (e.g. ActiveRecord) extends a more basic Model class whose sole job is data representation/manipulation.
null
0
1316381280
False
0
c2ktu4z
t3_ki83r
null
t1_c2ktu4z
t1_c2kq8s6
null
1427616679
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
brandf
null
how does this compare this to .NET? C# 5 await + TPL + PLINQ is pretty nice.
null
0
1316381289
False
0
c2ktu6f
t3_kjdt6
null
t1_c2ktu6f
t3_kjdt6
null
1427616679
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
That style of programming reminds me of VB 6 and incremental compilation, and it royally sucked. I would get half-way through testing something and boom, a bear comes out.
null
0
1316381320
False
0
c2ktuax
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktuax
t1_c2kt8g9
null
1427616681
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
thegeek2
null
Why not use tools to ensure they all match? That way you get all the benefits of static typing with very little cost. I find c# a lot easier to work in than many dynamic languages due to the amazing IDE that is Visual Studio 2010 + Resharper.
null
0
1316381352
False
0
c2ktuf8
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktuf8
t1_c2kt7mu
null
1427616682
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ssylvan
null
They didn't just add a bunch of extensions for no reason. They added them because they absolutely needed those extensions in order to support the scenarios that they wanted (in particular, fast native code that still has a safe ABI accessible to multiple languages).
null
0
1316381361
False
0
c2ktugp
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktugp
t1_c2ksagv
null
1427616683
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316381364
False
0
c2ktuh8
t3_kjj9n
null
t1_c2ktuh8
t3_kjj9n
null
1427616683
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
fgriglesnickerseven
null
Good ol' Herb really has his 'fondle my managers balls' gesture down.
null
0
1316381378
False
0
c2ktuj8
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktuj8
t3_kjja4
null
1427616684
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316381396
False
0
c2ktulw
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktulw
t1_c2ktjbe
null
1427616685
-11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
Languages As the successor to COM, the WinRT API is meant to be equally accessible from C++, .NET, and JavaScript.
null
0
1316381445
False
0
c2ktut6
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktut6
t1_c2ksagv
null
1427616688
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
clubdirthill
null
You need H.264 codec support. Thus, Safari and IE9 are your only bets.
null
0
1316381473
False
0
c2ktuxm
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktuxm
t1_c2kse00
null
1427616690
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
The current build of WinRT does not support C++/CLI. I do not know if that will change in the future.
null
0
1316381486
False
0
c2ktuz4
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktuz4
t1_c2kszww
null
1427616691
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mkantor
null
Really? I've always found the opposite. Eventually you end up phasing most of it out or tweaking the underlying implementation but the early prototyping-phase speed gains of a good ORM class have been pretty significant in my bigger projects. Maybe we just work on different kinds of software.
null
0
1316381519
False
0
c2ktv4d
t3_ki83r
null
t1_c2ktv4d
t1_c2klpcx
null
1427616693
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
henk53
null
>Lack of events It's probably not exactly what you meant, but the standard library now has an eventing system: http://blogs.oracle.com/arungupta/entry/totd_145_cdi_events_a A more heavyweight form of events via messaging has been supported by for a good decade as well via JMS in the standard library.
null
0
1316381578
False
0
c2ktvd2
t3_kjf91
null
t1_c2ktvd2
t1_c2ksgkk
null
1427616696
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
The way you know that a topic is becoming mainstream is preponderance of poorly written tutorials on that topic (just think about what was/is happening with buzzwords that were/are Java, XML, and now HTML5). So the fact that this article is not well written is actually a good thing -- functional programming is becoming mainstream.
null
0
1316381589
False
0
c2ktvf9
t3_kjkxj
null
t1_c2ktvf9
t3_kjkxj
null
1427616696
13
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
shevegen
null
I cant play this video. Youtube works isnt there a youtube link to it?
null
0
1316381629
False
0
c2ktvl6
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktvl6
t3_kjja4
null
1427616699
-4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tgehr
null
Those are macros, or templates. Generics are less powerful and less efficient, but in return simpler and generate less machine/VM/whatever code.
null
0
1316381654
False
0
c2ktvph
t3_kikut
null
t1_c2ktvph
t1_c2kmqkl
null
1427616700
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[Relevant](http://www.destinati.com/writing/sci.phys/Optical.pdf)
null
0
1316381663
False
0
c2ktvqx
t3_kgfhb
null
t1_c2ktvqx
t3_kgfhb
null
1427616701
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
danharaj
null
I don't see how that's possible since C++ templates are (unfortunately) Turing complete.
null
0
1316381701
False
0
c2ktvw0
t3_kikut
null
t1_c2ktvw0
t1_c2ktqxm
null
1427616711
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
henk53
null
Wow, thanks for reminding me about that :) VS6 was as far as I remember actually one of the best Java IDEs at the time and Microsofts JVM actually the fastest one around. What a difference a decade makes, unimaginable today... *(not that MS is bad, or VS is bad, but that Microsoft was one of the top Java players)*
null
0
1316381721
False
0
c2ktvyt
t3_kjf91
null
t1_c2ktvyt
t1_c2ktq13
null
1427616703
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
henk53
null
Some aunt you have :P
null
0
1316381753
False
0
c2ktw34
t3_kjf91
null
t1_c2ktw34
t1_c2ktpl0
null
1427616713
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316381782
False
0
c2ktw7v
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktw7v
t1_c2ktuxm
null
1427616716
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MaikB
null
That style of programming is just for the rather short timespan during the design of the algorithm. I found it to be more time efficient to allow myself to be messy in the early design phase.
null
0
1316381809
False
0
c2ktwc3
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktwc3
t1_c2ktuax
null
1427616718
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kirakun
null
That's exactly my point. UNIX file system was another example I cited (since that is where I'm more familiar).
null
0
1316381921
False
0
c2ktws9
t3_kjhvo
null
t1_c2ktws9
t1_c2ksqmi
null
1427616718
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kirakun
null
OOP! Are you following the comments?
null
0
1316381971
False
0
c2ktwwp
t3_kjhvo
null
t1_c2ktwwp
t1_c2kt1oo
null
1427616721
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
danharaj
null
I always hate when yet another soap box blog about Haskell wanders its way onto the front page. Haskell is great, and there are really great communicators who expound on its greatness. Everyone and their dog doesn't need to talk about it. Also, when you write a blog post and submit it to /r/programming, you're making a glorified self-post that gets karma and circumvents the sidebar rules. So dishonest.
null
0
1316381971
False
0
c2ktwwr
t3_kjkxj
null
t1_c2ktwwr
t1_c2ktvf9
null
1427616721
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kirakun
null
OOP! Are you following the comments?
null
0
1316381980
False
0
c2ktwzt
t3_kjhvo
null
t1_c2ktwzt
t1_c2kt1oo
null
1427616720
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
henk53
null
That would be an interesting comparison really. From what I've heard the Task Parallel Library in .NET is pretty slick and C#'s clossures makes al sorts of parallel computations easier to express. But the Java concurrent library really holds it own, and fork/join is a really powerful addition.
null
0
1316382010
False
0
c2ktx5k
t3_kjdt6
null
t1_c2ktx5k
t1_c2ktu6f
null
1427616724
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ethraax
null
When I was speaking of call sites, I was thinking more about argument types than return types. Either way, I don't see much use of `var` in C#, but that was working with a sizable corporation, so perhaps smaller companies are faster to jump on newer syntax.
null
0
1316382101
False
0
c2ktxiy
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktxiy
t1_c2kttne
null
1427616729
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
HazzyPls
null
Why am I bending over backwards just to watch a freaking video? Sound doesn't work with Moonlight, it won't let my browser use HTML5, and I'm currently downloading the entire mp4 file to watch it offline.
null
0
1316382324
False
0
c2ktyfz
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2ktyfz
t3_kjja4
null
1427616739
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ironykarl
null
The principle's the same, really.
null
0
1316382333
False
0
c2ktyha
t3_khvyw
null
t1_c2ktyha
t1_c2ktpfj
null
1427616739
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
> I've been in the 95th percentile my entire life We're not talking about the 95th percentile, we're talking about the 99.999th percentile with this kid.
null
0
1316382397
False
0
c2ktyr4
t3_khf6j
null
t1_c2ktyr4
t1_c2kh9sm
null
1427616743
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
The whole premise of this article is bullshit, that because ORM is currently insufficient for all needs that it is an 'anti-pattern.' I carry around the weight of ORM specific knowledge along with my knowledge of SQL because having both is overall much faster than if I only had one. Having said that, I think he does have some good points and the people who write ORMs should be paying attention.
null
0
1316382402
False
0
c2ktyrx
t3_ki83r
null
t1_c2ktyrx
t1_c2kp42a
null
1427616743
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null