Upload set_047_黄誉扬.json
Browse files- set_047_黄誉扬.json +101 -0
set_047_黄誉扬.json
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
{
|
| 2 |
+
"set_id": "set_047",
|
| 3 |
+
"annotator": "黄誉扬",
|
| 4 |
+
"qa_pairs": [
|
| 5 |
+
{
|
| 6 |
+
"id": 1,
|
| 7 |
+
"domain": "Culture",
|
| 8 |
+
"task_type": {
|
| 9 |
+
"L1": "III. Cross-Video Integrated Reasoning",
|
| 10 |
+
"L2": "6. Integrated Summarization",
|
| 11 |
+
"L3": "(2) Comparative Summarization"
|
| 12 |
+
},
|
| 13 |
+
"question": "Comparing Video A and Video B, what is the fundamental divergence in their underlying logic when defining the 'success of the electric vehicle industry'?",
|
| 14 |
+
"options": {
|
| 15 |
+
"A": "Video A adopts a 'technology-climate' oriented framework: success lies in breakthroughs in battery energy density and fossil fuel replacement rate; Video B adopts an 'ethics-human rights' oriented framework: if the transition relies on the exploitation of miners in the DRC, such a transition is morally a failure.",
|
| 16 |
+
"B": "Video A believes success lies in sufficient government subsidies, while Video B believes success lies in rising mineral prices.",
|
| 17 |
+
"C": "Both videos regard technological progress as the only criterion for success; Video A focuses on lithium batteries, while Video B focuses on hydrogen fuel.",
|
| 18 |
+
"D": "Video A focuses on showing drivers' experience, while Video B focuses on showing battery recycling processes."
|
| 19 |
+
},
|
| 20 |
+
"answer": "A",
|
| 21 |
+
"evidence": [],
|
| 22 |
+
"created_at": "2026-02-25T21:29:42.503272"
|
| 23 |
+
},
|
| 24 |
+
{
|
| 25 |
+
"id": 2,
|
| 26 |
+
"domain": "Culture",
|
| 27 |
+
"task_type": {
|
| 28 |
+
"L1": "III. Cross-Video Integrated Reasoning",
|
| 29 |
+
"L2": "6. Integrated Summarization",
|
| 30 |
+
"L3": "(2) Comparative Summarization"
|
| 31 |
+
},
|
| 32 |
+
"question": "Video A frequently uses 'Sustainable' to describe future battery technologies, while Video B exposes the reality of cobalt mining. What is the divergence in the connotation coverage of the term 'sustainability' between the two?",
|
| 33 |
+
"options": {
|
| 34 |
+
"A": "Video A believes sustainability means inexhaustible resources, while Video B believes sustainability means permanent battery recycling.",
|
| 35 |
+
"B": "Both videos believe the current model is unsustainable; Video A worries about grid load, while Video B worries about battery explosions.",
|
| 36 |
+
"C": "Video A focuses on emission reduction targets in Nordic countries, while Video B focuses on ore production in the DRC.",
|
| 37 |
+
"D": "Video A's definition is 'environmental emission reduction-oriented': focusing on low-carbon emissions at the energy use end; Video B's definition is 'life-cycle justice-oriented': emphasizing that ecological fairness and labor rights in raw material extraction must be included, otherwise 'green' is only a rhetorical cover."
|
| 38 |
+
},
|
| 39 |
+
"answer": "D",
|
| 40 |
+
"evidence": [],
|
| 41 |
+
"created_at": "2026-02-25T21:30:06.173239"
|
| 42 |
+
},
|
| 43 |
+
{
|
| 44 |
+
"id": 3,
|
| 45 |
+
"domain": "Culture",
|
| 46 |
+
"task_type": {
|
| 47 |
+
"L1": "III. Cross-Video Integrated Reasoning",
|
| 48 |
+
"L2": "6. Integrated Summarization",
|
| 49 |
+
"L3": "(2) Comparative Summarization"
|
| 50 |
+
},
|
| 51 |
+
"question": "Regarding resource and ethical issues in the battery supply chain, what is the essential difference in the implied solution logic between Video A and Video B?",
|
| 52 |
+
"options": {
|
| 53 |
+
"A": "Video A suggests directly stopping EV production, while Video B suggests expanding the scale of artisanal mining.",
|
| 54 |
+
"B": "Video A tends toward 'technological correction logic': advocating bypassing ethical dilemmas by developing 'cobalt-free batteries' or synthetic biotechnology; Video B tends toward 'political intervention logic': implying the need for stricter international supply chain auditing and fair trade frameworks, not just technological avoidance.",
|
| 55 |
+
"C": "Both videos suggest using robots for mining in Africa; Video A focuses on cost, while Video B focuses on safety.",
|
| 56 |
+
"D": "Video A focuses on appealing for consumer donations, while Video B focuses on appealing for scientists to switch careers."
|
| 57 |
+
},
|
| 58 |
+
"answer": "B",
|
| 59 |
+
"evidence": [],
|
| 60 |
+
"created_at": "2026-02-25T21:30:32.193356"
|
| 61 |
+
},
|
| 62 |
+
{
|
| 63 |
+
"id": 4,
|
| 64 |
+
"domain": "Culture",
|
| 65 |
+
"task_type": {
|
| 66 |
+
"L1": "III. Cross-Video Integrated Reasoning",
|
| 67 |
+
"L2": "6. Integrated Summarization",
|
| 68 |
+
"L3": "(2) Comparative Summarization"
|
| 69 |
+
},
|
| 70 |
+
"question": "Observing the dust-free laboratory footage in Video A and the muddy mining site footage in Video B, how do their audiovisual languages align with their respective positions?",
|
| 71 |
+
"options": {
|
| 72 |
+
"A": "Video A has significantly higher video quality than Video B to prove that the tech side is more authoritative.",
|
| 73 |
+
"B": "Video A uses a lot of fast-paced pop music, while Video B uses a lot of silence.",
|
| 74 |
+
"C": "Video A focuses on showing white-collar work status, while Video B focuses on showing robot trajectories.",
|
| 75 |
+
"D": "Video A constructs a visual implication of 'future, pure, and harmless' through bright, cool-toned laboratory close-ups; Video B deconstructs the glamorous surface of tech products and creates a strong sense of 'reality shock' through shaky handheld footage, dark tones, and miners' dusty faces."
|
| 76 |
+
},
|
| 77 |
+
"answer": "D",
|
| 78 |
+
"evidence": [],
|
| 79 |
+
"created_at": "2026-02-25T21:31:04.391421"
|
| 80 |
+
},
|
| 81 |
+
{
|
| 82 |
+
"id": 5,
|
| 83 |
+
"domain": "Culture",
|
| 84 |
+
"task_type": {
|
| 85 |
+
"L1": "III. Cross-Video Integrated Reasoning",
|
| 86 |
+
"L2": "6. Integrated Summarization",
|
| 87 |
+
"L3": "(2) Comparative Summarization"
|
| 88 |
+
},
|
| 89 |
+
"question": "Regarding the benefit distribution of the global energy transition, what is the positional divergence presented by Video A and Video B?",
|
| 90 |
+
"options": {
|
| 91 |
+
"A": "Both videos believe African countries should abandon mining and shift to the service industry.",
|
| 92 |
+
"B": "Video A advocates complete trade barriers, while Video B advocates full globalization.",
|
| 93 |
+
"C": "Video A views the global supply chain as a 'win-win ladder of progress', focusing on how countries divide labor to maximize efficiency; Video B views it as 'unequal resource plunder', focusing on how the green vision of developed countries is built on the 'externalized costs' of resources and lives of Global South nations.",
|
| 94 |
+
"D": "Video A focuses on corporate financial profits, while Video B focuses on battery chemical stability."
|
| 95 |
+
},
|
| 96 |
+
"answer": "C",
|
| 97 |
+
"evidence": [],
|
| 98 |
+
"created_at": "2026-02-25T21:31:32.046101"
|
| 99 |
+
}
|
| 100 |
+
]
|
| 101 |
+
}
|