Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .

1	( in millions )	maturity amount	unamortized discount	carrying value	fair value

2	3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014	$ 1000	$ 2014	$ 1000	$ 1029

3	1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015	750	2014	750	759

4	6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017	700	-2 ( 2 )	698	812

5	5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019	1000	-2 ( 2 )	998	1140

6	4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021	750	-3 ( 3 )	747	799

7	3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022	750	-4 ( 4 )	746	745

8	total long-term borrowings	$ 4950	$ -11 ( 11 )	$ 4939	$ 5284

 long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 . 2015 and 2022 notes . in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) . net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes . at december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2013 and 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . ( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) . interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year . the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes . at december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . in may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) . during the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid . 2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes . in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively . net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year . these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . these notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes . at december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2017 notes . in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) . a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year . the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .
Conversations:
Question: what is the sum of carrying value of notes due 2014 and 2015?
Answer:

Answer: 1750.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .

1	( in millions )	maturity amount	unamortized discount	carrying value	fair value

2	3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014	$ 1000	$ 2014	$ 1000	$ 1029

3	1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015	750	2014	750	759

4	6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017	700	-2 ( 2 )	698	812

5	5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019	1000	-2 ( 2 )	998	1140

6	4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021	750	-3 ( 3 )	747	799

7	3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022	750	-4 ( 4 )	746	745

8	total long-term borrowings	$ 4950	$ -11 ( 11 )	$ 4939	$ 5284

 long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 . 2015 and 2022 notes . in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) . net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes . at december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2013 and 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . ( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) . interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year . the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes . at december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . in may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) . during the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid . 2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes . in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively . net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year . these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . these notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes . at december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2017 notes . in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) . a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year . the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .
Conversations:
q0: what is the sum of carrying value of notes due 2014 and 2015? {answer0}
Question: what is the sum including those due in 2017?
Answer:

Answer: 2448.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: impairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: .

1	( in millions )	2009	2008

2	fair value	$ 72699	$ 54163

3	amortized cost	74843	60786

4	net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -2144 ( 2144 )	$ -6623 ( 6623 )

5	net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -1316 ( 1316 )	$ -4057 ( 4057 )

 the above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income . the decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) . the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 . such factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income . national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current . management currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) . as an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities . additional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. .
Conversations:
Question: what is the net change in amortized cost during 2009?
Answer:

Answer: 14057.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: impairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: .

1	( in millions )	2009	2008

2	fair value	$ 72699	$ 54163

3	amortized cost	74843	60786

4	net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -2144 ( 2144 )	$ -6623 ( 6623 )

5	net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -1316 ( 1316 )	$ -4057 ( 4057 )

 the above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income . the decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) . the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 . such factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income . national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current . management currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) . as an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities . additional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the net change in amortized cost during 2009? {answer0}
Question: what is that over the 2008 value?
Answer:

Answer: 0.23125


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses . these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions . the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond . asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries . this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity . the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 . sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

1	project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location

2	cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states

3	aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia

4	mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states

5	kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa

6	songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania

7	aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom

8	aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh

9	aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia

10	medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom

11	aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

 the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future . however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet . for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries . depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations . furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve . subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses . the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities . businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile . brazil eletropaulo . aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized . in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it . aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a . ( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a . ( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a . ( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .
Conversations:
Question: what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003?
Answer:

Answer: 495.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses . these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions . the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond . asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries . this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity . the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 . sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

1	project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location

2	cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states

3	aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia

4	mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states

5	kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa

6	songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania

7	aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom

8	aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh

9	aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia

10	medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom

11	aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

 the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future . however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet . for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries . depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations . furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve . subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses . the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities . businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile . brazil eletropaulo . aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized . in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it . aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a . ( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a . ( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a . ( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .
Conversations:
q0: what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003? {answer0}
Question: what were the proceeds from aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart in january 2003?
Answer:

Answer: 59.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses . these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions . the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond . asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries . this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity . the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 . sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

1	project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location

2	cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states

3	aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia

4	mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states

5	kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa

6	songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania

7	aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom

8	aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh

9	aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia

10	medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom

11	aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

 the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future . however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet . for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries . depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations . furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve . subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses . the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities . businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile . brazil eletropaulo . aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized . in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it . aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a . ( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a . ( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a . ( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .
Conversations:
q0: what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003? {answer0}
q1: what were the proceeds from aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart in january 2003? {answer1}
Question: what is the sum?
Answer:

Answer: 554.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses . these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions . the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond . asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries . this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity . the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 . sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

1	project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location

2	cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states

3	aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia

4	mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states

5	kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa

6	songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania

7	aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom

8	aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh

9	aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia

10	medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom

11	aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

 the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future . however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet . for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries . depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations . furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve . subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses . the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities . businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile . brazil eletropaulo . aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized . in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it . aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a . ( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a . ( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a . ( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .
Conversations:
q0: what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003? {answer0}
q1: what were the proceeds from aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart in january 2003? {answer1}
q2: what is the sum? {answer2}
Question: what is the sum including mountainview proceeds?
Answer:

Answer: 584.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses . these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions . the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond . asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries . this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity . the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 . sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

1	project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location

2	cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states

3	aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia

4	mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states

5	kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa

6	songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania

7	aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom

8	aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh

9	aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia

10	medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom

11	aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

 the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future . however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet . for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries . depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations . furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve . subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses . the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities . businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile . brazil eletropaulo . aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized . in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it . aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a . ( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a . ( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a . ( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .
Conversations:
q0: what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003? {answer0}
q1: what were the proceeds from aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart in january 2003? {answer1}
q2: what is the sum? {answer2}
q3: what is the sum including mountainview proceeds? {answer3}
Question: what is the proceeds from kelvin?
Answer:

Answer: 29.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses . these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions . the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond . asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries . this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity . the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 . sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

1	project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location

2	cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states

3	aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia

4	mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states

5	kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa

6	songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania

7	aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom

8	aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh

9	aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia

10	medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom

11	aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

 the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future . however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet . for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries . depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations . furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve . subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses . the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities . businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile . brazil eletropaulo . aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized . in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it . aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a . ( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a . ( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a . ( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .
Conversations:
q0: what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003? {answer0}
q1: what were the proceeds from aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart in january 2003? {answer1}
q2: what is the sum? {answer2}
q3: what is the sum including mountainview proceeds? {answer3}
q4: what is the proceeds from kelvin? {answer4}
Question: what is the total sum from the 4 projects?
Answer:

Answer: 613.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions . oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil . oneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million . the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes . for example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated . oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk . oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations . oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities . in addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided . when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk . at december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business . distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas . gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism . energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations . we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges . we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments . both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value . fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. .

1		( thousands of dollars )

2	net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007	$ 25171

3	derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period	-55874 ( 55874 )

4	fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period	236772

5	other changes in fair value	52731

6	net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )	$ 258800

 ( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy . the maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 . fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es .
Conversations:
Question: what was the net change in the fair value of derivatives outstanding from 2007 to 2008?
Answer:

Answer: 233629.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions . oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil . oneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million . the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes . for example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated . oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk . oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations . oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities . in addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided . when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk . at december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business . distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas . gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism . energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations . we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges . we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments . both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value . fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. .

1		( thousands of dollars )

2	net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007	$ 25171

3	derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period	-55874 ( 55874 )

4	fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period	236772

5	other changes in fair value	52731

6	net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )	$ 258800

 ( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy . the maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 . fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es .
Conversations:
q0: what was the net change in the fair value of derivatives outstanding from 2007 to 2008? {answer0}
Question: what was the value in 2007?
Answer:

Answer: 25171.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions . oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil . oneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million . the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes . for example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated . oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk . oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations . oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities . in addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided . when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk . at december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business . distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas . gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism . energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations . we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges . we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments . both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value . fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. .

1		( thousands of dollars )

2	net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007	$ 25171

3	derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period	-55874 ( 55874 )

4	fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period	236772

5	other changes in fair value	52731

6	net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )	$ 258800

 ( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy . the maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 . fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es .
Conversations:
q0: what was the net change in the fair value of derivatives outstanding from 2007 to 2008? {answer0}
q1: what was the value in 2007? {answer1}
Question: what is the net change over the 2007 value?
Answer:

Answer: 9.28167


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016

2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81

3	interest cost	90	61	72

4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )

5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )

6	amortization of loss	78	92	77

7	settlements	2	2014	7

8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113

9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Conversations:
Question: what was the net pension cost in 2018?
Answer:

Answer: 137.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016

2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81

3	interest cost	90	61	72

4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )

5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )

6	amortization of loss	78	92	77

7	settlements	2	2014	7

8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113

9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the net pension cost in 2018? {answer0}
Question: and in 2017?
Answer:

Answer: 138.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016

2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81

3	interest cost	90	61	72

4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )

5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )

6	amortization of loss	78	92	77

7	settlements	2	2014	7

8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113

9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the net pension cost in 2018? {answer0}
q1: and in 2017? {answer1}
Question: combined, what was the total for these two years?
Answer:

Answer: 275.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016

2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81

3	interest cost	90	61	72

4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )

5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )

6	amortization of loss	78	92	77

7	settlements	2	2014	7

8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113

9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the net pension cost in 2018? {answer0}
q1: and in 2017? {answer1}
q2: combined, what was the total for these two years? {answer2}
Question: and in 2016?
Answer:

Answer: 113.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016

2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81

3	interest cost	90	61	72

4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )

5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )

6	amortization of loss	78	92	77

7	settlements	2	2014	7

8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113

9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the net pension cost in 2018? {answer0}
q1: and in 2017? {answer1}
q2: combined, what was the total for these two years? {answer2}
q3: and in 2016? {answer3}
Question: combined, what was the total for these three years?
Answer:

Answer: 388.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: goodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed . the company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits : 2022 increased market presence and opportunities . the combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue , earnings and stockholder return . the company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers , as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies , products and services . the company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets . the company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 . 2022 operating efficiencies . the combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings . the company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa , in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets , including in-process research and development . the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended december 30 , year ended december 31 .

1		year ended december 30 2007	year ended december 31 2006

2	revenue	$ 366854	$ 187103

3	net income ( loss )	$ 17388	$ -38957 ( 38957 )

4	net income ( loss ) per share basic	$ 0.32	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )

5	net income ( loss ) per share diluted	$ 0.29	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )

 the pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented , or the results that may occur in the future . the pro forma results exclude the $ 303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 . investment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 , the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $ 50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies . this investment was valued at $ 67.8 million as of december 31 , 2006 , which represented a market value of $ 13.15 per share of solexa common stock . this investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26 , 2007 . illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Conversations:
Question: what were revenues in 2007?
Answer:

Answer: 366854.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: goodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed . the company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits : 2022 increased market presence and opportunities . the combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue , earnings and stockholder return . the company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers , as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies , products and services . the company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets . the company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 . 2022 operating efficiencies . the combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings . the company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa , in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets , including in-process research and development . the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended december 30 , year ended december 31 .

1		year ended december 30 2007	year ended december 31 2006

2	revenue	$ 366854	$ 187103

3	net income ( loss )	$ 17388	$ -38957 ( 38957 )

4	net income ( loss ) per share basic	$ 0.32	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )

5	net income ( loss ) per share diluted	$ 0.29	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )

 the pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented , or the results that may occur in the future . the pro forma results exclude the $ 303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 . investment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 , the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $ 50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies . this investment was valued at $ 67.8 million as of december 31 , 2006 , which represented a market value of $ 13.15 per share of solexa common stock . this investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26 , 2007 . illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Conversations:
q0: what were revenues in 2007? {answer0}
Question: what were they in 2006?
Answer:

Answer: 187103.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: goodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed . the company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits : 2022 increased market presence and opportunities . the combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue , earnings and stockholder return . the company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers , as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies , products and services . the company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets . the company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 . 2022 operating efficiencies . the combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings . the company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa , in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets , including in-process research and development . the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended december 30 , year ended december 31 .

1		year ended december 30 2007	year ended december 31 2006

2	revenue	$ 366854	$ 187103

3	net income ( loss )	$ 17388	$ -38957 ( 38957 )

4	net income ( loss ) per share basic	$ 0.32	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )

5	net income ( loss ) per share diluted	$ 0.29	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )

 the pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented , or the results that may occur in the future . the pro forma results exclude the $ 303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 . investment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 , the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $ 50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies . this investment was valued at $ 67.8 million as of december 31 , 2006 , which represented a market value of $ 13.15 per share of solexa common stock . this investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26 , 2007 . illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Conversations:
q0: what were revenues in 2007? {answer0}
q1: what were they in 2006? {answer1}
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer:

Answer: 179751.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: goodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed . the company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits : 2022 increased market presence and opportunities . the combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue , earnings and stockholder return . the company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers , as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies , products and services . the company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets . the company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 . 2022 operating efficiencies . the combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings . the company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa , in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets , including in-process research and development . the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended december 30 , year ended december 31 .

1		year ended december 30 2007	year ended december 31 2006

2	revenue	$ 366854	$ 187103

3	net income ( loss )	$ 17388	$ -38957 ( 38957 )

4	net income ( loss ) per share basic	$ 0.32	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )

5	net income ( loss ) per share diluted	$ 0.29	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )

 the pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented , or the results that may occur in the future . the pro forma results exclude the $ 303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 . investment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 , the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $ 50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies . this investment was valued at $ 67.8 million as of december 31 , 2006 , which represented a market value of $ 13.15 per share of solexa common stock . this investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26 , 2007 . illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Conversations:
q0: what were revenues in 2007? {answer0}
q1: what were they in 2006? {answer1}
q2: what is the net difference? {answer2}
Question: what is the difference divided by the 2006 revenues?
Answer:

Answer: 0.96071


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2006 . containerboard export sales volumes are expected to decline due to scheduled first-quarter main- tenance outages . sales volumes for u.s . converted products will be higher due to more shipping days , but expected softer demand should cause the ship- ments per day to decrease . average sales price real- izations are expected to be comparable to fourth- quarter averages . an additional containerboard price increase was announced in january that is expected to be fully realized in the second quarter . costs for wood , energy , starch , adhesives and freight are expected to increase . manufacturing costs will be higher due to costs associated with scheduled main- tenance outages in the containerboard mills . euro- pean container operating results are expected to improve as seasonally higher sales volumes and improved margins more than offset slightly higher manufacturing costs . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2005 and 7% ( 7 % ) compared with 2004 . operating profits rose 8% ( 8 % ) from 2005 , but declined 15% ( 15 % ) from 2004 levels . compared with 2005 , higher sales volumes ( $ 9 million ) , improved average sales price realizations ( $ 33 million ) , reduced lack-of-order downtime ( $ 18 million ) , and favorable mill oper- ations ( $ 25 million ) were partially offset by higher raw material costs ( $ 19 million ) and freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , unfavorable mix ( $ 14 million ) and other costs ( $ 21 million ) . consumer packaging in millions 2006 2005 2004 .

1	in millions	2006	2005	2004

2	sales	$ 2455	$ 2245	$ 2295

3	operating profit	$ 131	$ 121	$ 155

 coated paperboard net sales of $ 1.5 billion in 2006 were higher than $ 1.3 billion in 2005 and $ 1.1 billion in 2004 . sales volumes increased in 2006 compared with 2005 , particularly in the folding car- ton board segment , reflecting improved demand for coated paperboard products . in 2006 , our coated paperboard mills took 4000 tons of lack-of-order downtime , compared with 82000 tons of lack-of-order downtime in 2005 . average sales price realizations were substantially improved in the cur- rent year , principally for folding carton board and cupstock board . operating profits were 51% ( 51 % ) higher in 2006 than in 2005 , and 7% ( 7 % ) better than in 2004 . the impact of the higher sales prices along with more favorable manufacturing operations due to strong performance at the mills more than offset higher input costs for energy and freight . foodservice net sales declined to $ 396 million in 2006 , compared with $ 437 million in 2005 and $ 480 million in 2004 , due principally to the sale of the jackson , tennessee plant in july 2005 . sales vol- umes were lower in 2006 than in 2005 , although average sales prices were higher due to the realiza- tion of price increases implemented during 2005 . operating profits for 2006 improved over 2005 and 2004 levels largely due to the benefits from higher sales prices . raw material costs for bleached board were higher than in 2005 , but manufacturing costs were more favorable due to increased productivity and reduced waste . shorewood net sales of $ 670 million were down from $ 691 million in 2005 and $ 687 million in 2004 . sales volumes in 2006 were down from 2005 levels due to weak demand in the home entertainment and consumer products markets , although demand was strong in the tobacco segment . average sales prices for the year were lower than in 2005 . operating prof- its were down significantly from both 2005 and 2004 due to the decline in sales , particularly in the higher margin home entertainment markets , higher raw material costs for bleached board and certain inventory adjustment costs . entering 2007 , coated paperboard first-quarter sales volumes are expected to be seasonally stronger than in the fourth quarter 2006 for folding carton board and bristols . average sales price realizations are expected to rise with a price increase announced in january . it is anticipated that manufacturing costs will improve versus an unfavorable fourth quarter . foodservice earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to decline due to seasonally weaker vol- ume . however , sales price realizations will be slightly higher , and the seasonal switch to hot cup contain- ers will have a favorable impact on product mix . shorewood sales volumes for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to seasonally decline , but the earnings impact will be partially offset by pricing improvements and an improved product mix . distribution our distribution business , principally represented by our xpedx business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to customers in .
Conversations:
Question: what was the difference in shorewood net sales between 2005 and 2006?
Answer:

Answer: -21.0