Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

1		amount ( in millions )

2	2015 net revenue	$ 637.2

3	reserve equalization	14.3

4	purchased power capacity	12.4

5	transmission revenue	7.0

6	retail electric price	5.4

7	net wholesale	-27.8 ( 27.8 )

8	other	-4.3 ( 4.3 )

9	2016 net revenue	$ 644.2

 the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .
Conversations:
Question: what was the total value of both the reserve equalization and the purchased power capacity as a change in net revenue from 2015 to 2016, in millions?
Answer:

Answer: 26.7


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

1		amount ( in millions )

2	2015 net revenue	$ 637.2

3	reserve equalization	14.3

4	purchased power capacity	12.4

5	transmission revenue	7.0

6	retail electric price	5.4

7	net wholesale	-27.8 ( 27.8 )

8	other	-4.3 ( 4.3 )

9	2016 net revenue	$ 644.2

 the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the total value of both the reserve equalization and the purchased power capacity as a change in net revenue from 2015 to 2016, in millions? {answer0}
Question: including the transmission revenue, what then becomes that total value?
Answer:

Answer: 33.7


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

1		12/28/2013	1/3/2015	1/2/2016	12/31/2016	12/30/2017	12/29/2018

2	cadence design systems inc .	$ 100.00	$ 135.18	$ 149.39	$ 181.05	$ 300.22	$ 311.13

3	nasdaq composite	100.00	112.60	113.64	133.19	172.11	165.84

4	s&p 500	100.00	110.28	109.54	129.05	157.22	150.33

5	s&p 500 information technology	100.00	115.49	121.08	144.85	201.10	200.52

 the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Conversations:
Question: what is the value of cadence design system in 2018 less an initial investment of $100?
Answer:

Answer: 211.13


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

1		12/28/2013	1/3/2015	1/2/2016	12/31/2016	12/30/2017	12/29/2018

2	cadence design systems inc .	$ 100.00	$ 135.18	$ 149.39	$ 181.05	$ 300.22	$ 311.13

3	nasdaq composite	100.00	112.60	113.64	133.19	172.11	165.84

4	s&p 500	100.00	110.28	109.54	129.05	157.22	150.33

5	s&p 500 information technology	100.00	115.49	121.08	144.85	201.10	200.52

 the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the value of cadence design system in 2018 less an initial investment of $100? {answer0}
Question: what is that divided by 100?
Answer:

Answer: 2.1113


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

1		12/28/2013	1/3/2015	1/2/2016	12/31/2016	12/30/2017	12/29/2018

2	cadence design systems inc .	$ 100.00	$ 135.18	$ 149.39	$ 181.05	$ 300.22	$ 311.13

3	nasdaq composite	100.00	112.60	113.64	133.19	172.11	165.84

4	s&p 500	100.00	110.28	109.54	129.05	157.22	150.33

5	s&p 500 information technology	100.00	115.49	121.08	144.85	201.10	200.52

 the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the value of cadence design system in 2018 less an initial investment of $100? {answer0}
q1: what is that divided by 100? {answer1}
Question: what is the value of the nasdaq composite in 2018 less 100?
Answer:

Answer: 65.84


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

1		12/28/2013	1/3/2015	1/2/2016	12/31/2016	12/30/2017	12/29/2018

2	cadence design systems inc .	$ 100.00	$ 135.18	$ 149.39	$ 181.05	$ 300.22	$ 311.13

3	nasdaq composite	100.00	112.60	113.64	133.19	172.11	165.84

4	s&p 500	100.00	110.28	109.54	129.05	157.22	150.33

5	s&p 500 information technology	100.00	115.49	121.08	144.85	201.10	200.52

 the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the value of cadence design system in 2018 less an initial investment of $100? {answer0}
q1: what is that divided by 100? {answer1}
q2: what is the value of the nasdaq composite in 2018 less 100? {answer2}
Question: what is that divided by 100?
Answer:

Answer: 0.6584


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

1		12/28/2013	1/3/2015	1/2/2016	12/31/2016	12/30/2017	12/29/2018

2	cadence design systems inc .	$ 100.00	$ 135.18	$ 149.39	$ 181.05	$ 300.22	$ 311.13

3	nasdaq composite	100.00	112.60	113.64	133.19	172.11	165.84

4	s&p 500	100.00	110.28	109.54	129.05	157.22	150.33

5	s&p 500 information technology	100.00	115.49	121.08	144.85	201.10	200.52

 the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the value of cadence design system in 2018 less an initial investment of $100? {answer0}
q1: what is that divided by 100? {answer1}
q2: what is the value of the nasdaq composite in 2018 less 100? {answer2}
q3: what is that divided by 100? {answer3}
Question: what is the difference of the cadence percent change and that of the nasdaq?
Answer:

Answer: 1.4529


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

1	date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials

2	31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0

3	31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6

4	31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2

5	31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9

6	31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9

7	31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

 .
Conversations:
Question: what was the fluctuation in the total return of citi common stock for the five year period ended 2017?
Answer:

Answer: 93.5


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

1	date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials

2	31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0

3	31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6

4	31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2

5	31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9

6	31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9

7	31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

 .
Conversations:
q0: what was the fluctuation in the total return of citi common stock for the five year period ended 2017? {answer0}
Question: and what is this fluctuation as a percentage of that return in 2012?
Answer:

Answer: 0.935


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

1	date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials

2	31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0

3	31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6

4	31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2

5	31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9

6	31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9

7	31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

 .
Conversations:
q0: what was the fluctuation in the total return of citi common stock for the five year period ended 2017? {answer0}
q1: and what is this fluctuation as a percentage of that return in 2012? {answer1}
Question: in that same period, what was that fluctuation for the s&p 500?
Answer:

Answer: 108.1


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

1	date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials

2	31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0

3	31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6

4	31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2

5	31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9

6	31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9

7	31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

 .
Conversations:
q0: what was the fluctuation in the total return of citi common stock for the five year period ended 2017? {answer0}
q1: and what is this fluctuation as a percentage of that return in 2012? {answer1}
q2: in that same period, what was that fluctuation for the s&p 500? {answer2}
Question: how much did this s&p 500 fluctuation represent in relation to that citi one?
Answer:

Answer: 1.15615


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) . as a result of the reverse stock split , every 3 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share . the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares . the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 . on november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation . the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders . the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date . the company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 . the prices listed below for the fourth quarter of 2016 do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to pre-separation prices from earlier periods. .

1	quarter	2016 high	2016 low	2016 dividend	2016 high	2016 low	dividend

2	first	$ 30.66	$ 18.42	$ 0.09	$ 51.30	$ 37.95	$ 0.09

3	second	34.50	26.34	0.09	42.87	33.45	0.09

4	third	32.91	27.09	0.09	33.69	23.91	0.09

5	fourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )	32.10	16.75	0.09	33.54	23.43	0.09

6	year	$ 34.50	$ 16.75	$ 0.36	$ 51.30	$ 23.43	$ 0.36

 the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12885 as of february 23 , 2017. .
Conversations:
Question: what was the high sales price in the second quarter of 2016?
Answer:

Answer: 34.5


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) . as a result of the reverse stock split , every 3 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share . the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares . the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 . on november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation . the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders . the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date . the company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 . the prices listed below for the fourth quarter of 2016 do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to pre-separation prices from earlier periods. .

1	quarter	2016 high	2016 low	2016 dividend	2016 high	2016 low	dividend

2	first	$ 30.66	$ 18.42	$ 0.09	$ 51.30	$ 37.95	$ 0.09

3	second	34.50	26.34	0.09	42.87	33.45	0.09

4	third	32.91	27.09	0.09	33.69	23.91	0.09

5	fourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )	32.10	16.75	0.09	33.54	23.43	0.09

6	year	$ 34.50	$ 16.75	$ 0.36	$ 51.30	$ 23.43	$ 0.36

 the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12885 as of february 23 , 2017. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the high sales price in the second quarter of 2016? {answer0}
Question: what was the high price in the first quarter?
Answer:

Answer: 30.66


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) . as a result of the reverse stock split , every 3 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share . the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares . the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 . on november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation . the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders . the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date . the company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 . the prices listed below for the fourth quarter of 2016 do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to pre-separation prices from earlier periods. .

1	quarter	2016 high	2016 low	2016 dividend	2016 high	2016 low	dividend

2	first	$ 30.66	$ 18.42	$ 0.09	$ 51.30	$ 37.95	$ 0.09

3	second	34.50	26.34	0.09	42.87	33.45	0.09

4	third	32.91	27.09	0.09	33.69	23.91	0.09

5	fourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )	32.10	16.75	0.09	33.54	23.43	0.09

6	year	$ 34.50	$ 16.75	$ 0.36	$ 51.30	$ 23.43	$ 0.36

 the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12885 as of february 23 , 2017. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the high sales price in the second quarter of 2016? {answer0}
q1: what was the high price in the first quarter? {answer1}
Question: what is the ratio of the high prices, second quarter to first quarter?
Answer:

Answer: 1.12524


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) . as a result of the reverse stock split , every 3 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share . the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares . the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 . on november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation . the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders . the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date . the company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 . the prices listed below for the fourth quarter of 2016 do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to pre-separation prices from earlier periods. .

1	quarter	2016 high	2016 low	2016 dividend	2016 high	2016 low	dividend

2	first	$ 30.66	$ 18.42	$ 0.09	$ 51.30	$ 37.95	$ 0.09

3	second	34.50	26.34	0.09	42.87	33.45	0.09

4	third	32.91	27.09	0.09	33.69	23.91	0.09

5	fourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )	32.10	16.75	0.09	33.54	23.43	0.09

6	year	$ 34.50	$ 16.75	$ 0.36	$ 51.30	$ 23.43	$ 0.36

 the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12885 as of february 23 , 2017. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the high sales price in the second quarter of 2016? {answer0}
q1: what was the high price in the first quarter? {answer1}
q2: what is the ratio of the high prices, second quarter to first quarter? {answer2}
Question: what is that less 1?
Answer:

Answer: 0.12524


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2014 2013 .

1	millions	dec . 31 2014	dec . 312013

2	accounts payable	$ 877	$ 803

3	dividends payable	438	356

4	income and other taxes payable	412	491

5	accrued wages and vacation	409	385

6	accrued casualty costs	249	207

7	interest payable	178	169

8	equipment rents payable	100	96

9	other	640	579

10	total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities	$ 3303	$ 3086

 .
Conversations:
Question: what is the balance of total accounts payable and other current liabilities in 2014?
Answer:

Answer: 3303.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2014 2013 .

1	millions	dec . 31 2014	dec . 312013

2	accounts payable	$ 877	$ 803

3	dividends payable	438	356

4	income and other taxes payable	412	491

5	accrued wages and vacation	409	385

6	accrued casualty costs	249	207

7	interest payable	178	169

8	equipment rents payable	100	96

9	other	640	579

10	total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities	$ 3303	$ 3086

 .
Conversations:
q0: what is the balance of total accounts payable and other current liabilities in 2014? {answer0}
Question: what about in 2013?
Answer:

Answer: 3086.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2014 2013 .

1	millions	dec . 31 2014	dec . 312013

2	accounts payable	$ 877	$ 803

3	dividends payable	438	356

4	income and other taxes payable	412	491

5	accrued wages and vacation	409	385

6	accrued casualty costs	249	207

7	interest payable	178	169

8	equipment rents payable	100	96

9	other	640	579

10	total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities	$ 3303	$ 3086

 .
Conversations:
q0: what is the balance of total accounts payable and other current liabilities in 2014? {answer0}
q1: what about in 2013? {answer1}
Question: what is the net change?
Answer:

Answer: 217.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2014 2013 .

1	millions	dec . 31 2014	dec . 312013

2	accounts payable	$ 877	$ 803

3	dividends payable	438	356

4	income and other taxes payable	412	491

5	accrued wages and vacation	409	385

6	accrued casualty costs	249	207

7	interest payable	178	169

8	equipment rents payable	100	96

9	other	640	579

10	total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities	$ 3303	$ 3086

 .
Conversations:
q0: what is the balance of total accounts payable and other current liabilities in 2014? {answer0}
q1: what about in 2013? {answer1}
q2: what is the net change? {answer2}
Question: what about percentage change?
Answer:

Answer: 0.07032


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: during 2015 , $ 82 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 91 million of provision recapture during 2014 . charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2015 were $ 12 million compared to $ 42 million during 2014 . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , the alll on total purchased impaired loans was $ .3 billion and $ .9 billion , respectively . the decline in alll was primarily due to the change in our derecognition policy . for purchased impaired loan pools where an allowance has been recognized , subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded alll to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively . individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes . the cash flow re- estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the alll associated with the purchased impaired loans . activity for the accretable yield during 2015 and 2014 follows : table 66 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

1	in millions	2015	2014

2	january 1	$ 1558	$ 2055

3	accretion ( including excess cash recoveries )	-466 ( 466 )	-587 ( 587 )

4	net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable	226	208

5	disposals	-68 ( 68 )	-118 ( 118 )

6	december 31	$ 1250	$ 1558

 note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date . we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies . a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data follows . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 141 .
Conversations:
Question: what was the net change on all total purchased impaired loans between 12/31/15 and 12/31/14?
Answer:

Answer: -0.6


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: during 2015 , $ 82 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 91 million of provision recapture during 2014 . charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2015 were $ 12 million compared to $ 42 million during 2014 . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , the alll on total purchased impaired loans was $ .3 billion and $ .9 billion , respectively . the decline in alll was primarily due to the change in our derecognition policy . for purchased impaired loan pools where an allowance has been recognized , subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded alll to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively . individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes . the cash flow re- estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the alll associated with the purchased impaired loans . activity for the accretable yield during 2015 and 2014 follows : table 66 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

1	in millions	2015	2014

2	january 1	$ 1558	$ 2055

3	accretion ( including excess cash recoveries )	-466 ( 466 )	-587 ( 587 )

4	net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable	226	208

5	disposals	-68 ( 68 )	-118 ( 118 )

6	december 31	$ 1250	$ 1558

 note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date . we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies . a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data follows . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 141 .
Conversations:
q0: what was the net change on all total purchased impaired loans between 12/31/15 and 12/31/14? {answer0}
Question: what was the total provision recapture for purchased impaired loans between 2014 and 2015?
Answer:

Answer: 173.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: during 2015 , $ 82 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 91 million of provision recapture during 2014 . charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2015 were $ 12 million compared to $ 42 million during 2014 . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , the alll on total purchased impaired loans was $ .3 billion and $ .9 billion , respectively . the decline in alll was primarily due to the change in our derecognition policy . for purchased impaired loan pools where an allowance has been recognized , subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded alll to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively . individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes . the cash flow re- estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the alll associated with the purchased impaired loans . activity for the accretable yield during 2015 and 2014 follows : table 66 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

1	in millions	2015	2014

2	january 1	$ 1558	$ 2055

3	accretion ( including excess cash recoveries )	-466 ( 466 )	-587 ( 587 )

4	net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable	226	208

5	disposals	-68 ( 68 )	-118 ( 118 )

6	december 31	$ 1250	$ 1558

 note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date . we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies . a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data follows . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 141 .
Conversations:
q0: what was the net change on all total purchased impaired loans between 12/31/15 and 12/31/14? {answer0}
q1: what was the total provision recapture for purchased impaired loans between 2014 and 2015? {answer1}
Question: so what was the average during this time?
Answer:

Answer: 86.5


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: results of operations operating revenues millions 2014 2013 2012 % (  % ) change 2014 v 2013 % (  % ) change 2013 v 2012 .

1	millions	2014	2013	2012	% (  % ) change 2014 v 2013	% (  % ) change 2013 v 2012

2	freight revenues	$ 22560	$ 20684	$ 19686	9% ( 9 % )	5% ( 5 % )

3	other revenues	1428	1279	1240	12% ( 12 % )	3% ( 3 % )

4	total	$ 23988	$ 21963	$ 20926	9% ( 9 % )	5% ( 5 % )

 we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) . volume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil . freight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 . revenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 . arc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement . volume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments . our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively . fuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase . fuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) . in 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) . in 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .
Conversations:
Question: what was the difference in fuel surcharge program freight revenue between 2012 and 2013?
Answer:

Answer: 0.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: results of operations operating revenues millions 2014 2013 2012 % (  % ) change 2014 v 2013 % (  % ) change 2013 v 2012 .

1	millions	2014	2013	2012	% (  % ) change 2014 v 2013	% (  % ) change 2013 v 2012

2	freight revenues	$ 22560	$ 20684	$ 19686	9% ( 9 % )	5% ( 5 % )

3	other revenues	1428	1279	1240	12% ( 12 % )	3% ( 3 % )

4	total	$ 23988	$ 21963	$ 20926	9% ( 9 % )	5% ( 5 % )

 we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) . volume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil . freight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 . revenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 . arc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement . volume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments . our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively . fuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase . fuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) . in 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) . in 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the difference in fuel surcharge program freight revenue between 2012 and 2013? {answer0}
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
Answer:

Answer: 0.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the hartford financial services group , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 . deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits ( continued ) results changes in the dac balance are as follows: .

1		2011	2010	2009

2	balance january 1	$ 9857	$ 10686	$ 13248

3	deferred costs	2608	2648	2853

4	amortization 2014 dac	-2920 ( 2920 )	-2665 ( 2665 )	-3247 ( 3247 )

5	amortization 2014 dac from discontinued operations	2014	-17 ( 17 )	-10 ( 10 )

6	amortization 2014 unlock benefit ( charge ) pre-tax [1]	-507 ( 507 )	138	-1010 ( 1010 )

7	adjustments to unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and other [2]	-377 ( 377 )	-1159 ( 1159 )	-1031 ( 1031 )

8	effect of currency translation	83	215	-39 ( 39 )

9	cumulative effect of accounting change pre-tax [3]	2014	11	-78 ( 78 )

10	balance december 31	$ 8744	$ 9857	$ 10686

 [1] the most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2011 were assumption changes which reduced expected future gross profits including additional costs associated with implementing the japan hedging strategy and the u.s . variable annuity macro hedge program , as well as actual separate account returns below our aggregated estimated return . the most significant contributors to the unlock benefit recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2010 were actual separate account returns being above our aggregated estimated return . also included in the benefit are assumption updates related to benefits from withdrawals and lapses , offset by hedging , annuitization estimates on japan products , and long-term expected rate of return updates . the most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2009 were the results of actual separate account returns being significantly below our aggregated estimated return for the first quarter of 2009 , partially offset by actual returns being greater than our aggregated estimated return for the period from april 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2009 . [2] the most significant contributor to the adjustments was the effect of declining interest rates , resulting in unrealized gains on securities classified in aoci . other includes a $ 34 decrease as a result of the disposition of dac from the sale of the hartford investment canadian canada in 2010 . [3] for the year ended december 31 , 2010 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for embedded credit derivatives resulted in a decrease to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac benefit . in addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses decreased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance . for the year ended december 31 , 2009 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for investments other- than- temporarily impaired resulted in an increase to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac charge . in addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses increased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated future net amortization expense of present value of future profits for the succeeding five years is $ 39 , $ 58 , $ 24 , $ 23 and $ 22 in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 and 2016 , respectively. .
Conversations:
Question: what is the net change in estimated future net amortization expense of present value of future profits from 2013 to 2014?
Answer:

Answer: -34.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the hartford financial services group , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 . deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits ( continued ) results changes in the dac balance are as follows: .

1		2011	2010	2009

2	balance january 1	$ 9857	$ 10686	$ 13248

3	deferred costs	2608	2648	2853

4	amortization 2014 dac	-2920 ( 2920 )	-2665 ( 2665 )	-3247 ( 3247 )

5	amortization 2014 dac from discontinued operations	2014	-17 ( 17 )	-10 ( 10 )

6	amortization 2014 unlock benefit ( charge ) pre-tax [1]	-507 ( 507 )	138	-1010 ( 1010 )

7	adjustments to unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and other [2]	-377 ( 377 )	-1159 ( 1159 )	-1031 ( 1031 )

8	effect of currency translation	83	215	-39 ( 39 )

9	cumulative effect of accounting change pre-tax [3]	2014	11	-78 ( 78 )

10	balance december 31	$ 8744	$ 9857	$ 10686

 [1] the most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2011 were assumption changes which reduced expected future gross profits including additional costs associated with implementing the japan hedging strategy and the u.s . variable annuity macro hedge program , as well as actual separate account returns below our aggregated estimated return . the most significant contributors to the unlock benefit recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2010 were actual separate account returns being above our aggregated estimated return . also included in the benefit are assumption updates related to benefits from withdrawals and lapses , offset by hedging , annuitization estimates on japan products , and long-term expected rate of return updates . the most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2009 were the results of actual separate account returns being significantly below our aggregated estimated return for the first quarter of 2009 , partially offset by actual returns being greater than our aggregated estimated return for the period from april 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2009 . [2] the most significant contributor to the adjustments was the effect of declining interest rates , resulting in unrealized gains on securities classified in aoci . other includes a $ 34 decrease as a result of the disposition of dac from the sale of the hartford investment canadian canada in 2010 . [3] for the year ended december 31 , 2010 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for embedded credit derivatives resulted in a decrease to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac benefit . in addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses decreased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance . for the year ended december 31 , 2009 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for investments other- than- temporarily impaired resulted in an increase to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac charge . in addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses increased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated future net amortization expense of present value of future profits for the succeeding five years is $ 39 , $ 58 , $ 24 , $ 23 and $ 22 in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 and 2016 , respectively. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the net change in estimated future net amortization expense of present value of future profits from 2013 to 2014? {answer0}
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer:

Answer: -0.58621


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: rights each holder of a share of outstanding common stock also holds one share purchase right ( a "right" ) for each share of common stock . each right entitles the holder to purchase from the company one half of one-hundredth of a share of series a junior participating preferred stock , $ 0.01 par value ( the "junior preferred shares" ) , of the company at a price of $ 135 per one half of one-hundredth of a junior preferred share ( the "purchase price" ) . the rights are not exercisable until the earlier of acquisition by a person or group of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock ( an "acquiring person" ) or the announcement of an intention to make or commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer , the consummation of which would result in the beneficial ownership by a person or group of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock . in the event that any person or group becomes an acquiring person , each holder of a right other than the acquiring person will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise that number of shares of common stock having a market value of two times the purchase price and , in the event that the company is acquired in a business combination transaction or 50% ( 50 % ) or more of its assets are sold , each holder of a right will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise that number of shares of common stock of the acquiring company which at the time of the transaction will have a market value of two times the purchase price . under certain specified circumstances , the board of directors of the company may cause the rights ( other than rights owned by such person or group ) to be exchanged , in whole or in part , for common stock or junior preferred shares , at an exchange rate of one share of common stock per right or one half of one-hundredth of a junior preferred share per right . at any time prior to the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock , the board of directors of the company may redeem the rights in whole at a price of $ 0.01 per right . common stock reserved for future issuance at december 31 , 2003 , the company has reserved shares of common stock for future issuance under all equity compensation plans as follows ( shares in thousands ) : p . significant revenue arrangements the company has formed strategic collaborations with major pharmaceutical companies in the areas of drug discovery , development , and commercialization . research and development agreements provide the company with financial support and other valuable resources for research programs and development of clinical drug candidates , product development and marketing and sales of products . collaborative research and development agreements in the company's collaborative research , development and commercialization programs the company seeks to discover , develop and commercialize major pharmaceutical products in conjunction with and supported by the company's collaborators . collaborative research and development arrangements provide research funding over an initial contract period with renewal and termination options that vary by agreement . the agreements also include milestone payments based on the achievement or the occurrence of a designated event . the agreements may also contain development reimbursement provisions , royalty rights or profit sharing rights and manufacturing options . the terms of each agreement vary . the company has entered into significant research and development collaborations with large pharmaceutical companies . p . significant revenue arrangements novartis in may 2000 , the company and novartis pharma ag ( "novartis" ) entered into an agreement to collaborate on the discovery , development and commercialization of small molecule drugs directed at targets in the kinase protein family . under the agreement , novartis agreed to pay the company an up-front payment of $ 15000000 made upon signing of the agreement , up to $ 200000000 in product research funding over six .

1	common stock under stock and option plans	21829

2	common stock under the vertex purchase plan	249

3	common stock under the vertex 401 ( k ) plan	125

4	total	22203

 .
Conversations:
Question: what was the difference common stock under stock and option plans and the total number?
Answer:

Answer: 374.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: rights each holder of a share of outstanding common stock also holds one share purchase right ( a "right" ) for each share of common stock . each right entitles the holder to purchase from the company one half of one-hundredth of a share of series a junior participating preferred stock , $ 0.01 par value ( the "junior preferred shares" ) , of the company at a price of $ 135 per one half of one-hundredth of a junior preferred share ( the "purchase price" ) . the rights are not exercisable until the earlier of acquisition by a person or group of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock ( an "acquiring person" ) or the announcement of an intention to make or commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer , the consummation of which would result in the beneficial ownership by a person or group of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock . in the event that any person or group becomes an acquiring person , each holder of a right other than the acquiring person will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise that number of shares of common stock having a market value of two times the purchase price and , in the event that the company is acquired in a business combination transaction or 50% ( 50 % ) or more of its assets are sold , each holder of a right will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise that number of shares of common stock of the acquiring company which at the time of the transaction will have a market value of two times the purchase price . under certain specified circumstances , the board of directors of the company may cause the rights ( other than rights owned by such person or group ) to be exchanged , in whole or in part , for common stock or junior preferred shares , at an exchange rate of one share of common stock per right or one half of one-hundredth of a junior preferred share per right . at any time prior to the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock , the board of directors of the company may redeem the rights in whole at a price of $ 0.01 per right . common stock reserved for future issuance at december 31 , 2003 , the company has reserved shares of common stock for future issuance under all equity compensation plans as follows ( shares in thousands ) : p . significant revenue arrangements the company has formed strategic collaborations with major pharmaceutical companies in the areas of drug discovery , development , and commercialization . research and development agreements provide the company with financial support and other valuable resources for research programs and development of clinical drug candidates , product development and marketing and sales of products . collaborative research and development agreements in the company's collaborative research , development and commercialization programs the company seeks to discover , develop and commercialize major pharmaceutical products in conjunction with and supported by the company's collaborators . collaborative research and development arrangements provide research funding over an initial contract period with renewal and termination options that vary by agreement . the agreements also include milestone payments based on the achievement or the occurrence of a designated event . the agreements may also contain development reimbursement provisions , royalty rights or profit sharing rights and manufacturing options . the terms of each agreement vary . the company has entered into significant research and development collaborations with large pharmaceutical companies . p . significant revenue arrangements novartis in may 2000 , the company and novartis pharma ag ( "novartis" ) entered into an agreement to collaborate on the discovery , development and commercialization of small molecule drugs directed at targets in the kinase protein family . under the agreement , novartis agreed to pay the company an up-front payment of $ 15000000 made upon signing of the agreement , up to $ 200000000 in product research funding over six .

1	common stock under stock and option plans	21829

2	common stock under the vertex purchase plan	249

3	common stock under the vertex 401 ( k ) plan	125

4	total	22203

 .
Conversations:
q0: what was the difference common stock under stock and option plans and the total number? {answer0}
Question: so what was the percentage change?
Answer:

Answer: 0.01713


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) . as a result of the reverse stock split , every three shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share . the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares . the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 . on november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation . the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders . the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date . the company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation . see disposition of retained shares in note c to the consolidated financial statements in part ii item 8 of this form 10-k . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 . the prices listed below for those dates prior to november 1 , 2016 reflect stock trading prices of alcoa inc . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to the company 2019s post-separation prices. .

1	quarter	2017 high	2017 low	2017 dividend	2017 high	2017 low	dividend

2	first	$ 30.69	$ 18.64	$ 0.06	$ 30.66	$ 18.42	$ 0.09

3	second	28.65	21.76	0.06	34.50	26.34	0.09

4	third	26.84	22.67	0.06	32.91	27.09	0.09

5	fourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )	27.85	22.74	0.06	32.10	16.75	0.09

6	year	$ 30.69	$ 18.64	$ 0.24	$ 34.50	$ 16.75	$ 0.36

 the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12271 as of february 16 , 2018. .
Conversations:
Question: what is the highest stock price in the second quarter of 2017?
Answer:

Answer: 28.65