Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .

1	( in millions )	pensionbenefits	otherbenefits

2	2007	$ 1440	$ 260

3	2008	1490	260

4	2009	1540	270

5	2010	1600	270

6	2011	1660	270

7	years 2012 2013 2016	9530	1260

 as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .
Conversations:
Question: what was, in millions, the total of future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year?
Answer:

Answer: 1100.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .

1	( in millions )	pensionbenefits	otherbenefits

2	2007	$ 1440	$ 260

3	2008	1490	260

4	2009	1540	270

5	2010	1600	270

6	2011	1660	270

7	years 2012 2013 2016	9530	1260

 as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .
Conversations:
q0: what was, in millions, the total of future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year? {answer0}
Question: and how much do the future lease commitments that are due in 2008 represent in relation to this total, in percentage?
Answer:

Answer: 0.23091


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016

2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81

3	interest cost	90	61	72

4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )

5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )

6	amortization of loss	78	92	77

7	settlements	2	2014	7

8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113

9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Conversations:
Question: what was the interest cost for 2018?
Answer:

Answer: 90.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016

2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81

3	interest cost	90	61	72

4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )

5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )

6	amortization of loss	78	92	77

7	settlements	2	2014	7

8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113

9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the interest cost for 2018? {answer0}
Question: and in 2017?
Answer:

Answer: 61.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016

2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81

3	interest cost	90	61	72

4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )

5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )

6	amortization of loss	78	92	77

7	settlements	2	2014	7

8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113

9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the interest cost for 2018? {answer0}
q1: and in 2017? {answer1}
Question: combined, what was the total cost for the two years?
Answer:

Answer: 151.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016

2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81

3	interest cost	90	61	72

4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )

5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )

6	amortization of loss	78	92	77

7	settlements	2	2014	7

8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113

9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the interest cost for 2018? {answer0}
q1: and in 2017? {answer1}
q2: combined, what was the total cost for the two years? {answer2}
Question: and in 2016?
Answer:

Answer: 72.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016

2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81

3	interest cost	90	61	72

4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )

5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )

6	amortization of loss	78	92	77

7	settlements	2	2014	7

8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113

9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the interest cost for 2018? {answer0}
q1: and in 2017? {answer1}
q2: combined, what was the total cost for the two years? {answer2}
q3: and in 2016? {answer3}
Question: so what was the total for the three years?
Answer:

Answer: 223.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016

2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81

3	interest cost	90	61	72

4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )

5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )

6	amortization of loss	78	92	77

7	settlements	2	2014	7

8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113

9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the interest cost for 2018? {answer0}
q1: and in 2017? {answer1}
q2: combined, what was the total cost for the two years? {answer2}
q3: and in 2016? {answer3}
q4: so what was the total for the three years? {answer4}
Question: and what was the average during this period?
Answer:

Answer: 74.33333


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 70| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 the following table summarizes transactions for our rsus , excluding dividend equivalents , for 2009 : weighted average number of grant date restricted stock units rsus fair value .

1	restricted stock units	number of rsus	weighted average grant date fair value

2	rsus at december 31 2008	401375	$ 29.03

3	granted	1583616	$ 9.32

4	vested	-129352 ( 129352 )	$ 28.39

5	forfeited	-172033 ( 172033 )	$ 12.53

6	rsus at december 31 2009	1683606	$ 12.23

 compensation cost recognized for rsus totaled $ 7.3 million , $ 4.9 million and $ 3.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 6.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested rsus granted under the plan , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years . ( 14 ) financial instruments we are exposed to capital market risk , such as changes in interest rates . in an effort to manage interest rate risk , we may enter into interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time . we do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes . in november 2007 , we entered into forward starting interest swaps with notional amounts appropriate to hedge interest rates on $ 300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2009 . the forward starting swaps were appropriately designated and tested for effectiveness as cash flow hedges . in march 2008 , we settled the forward starting swaps and made a cash payment of $ 14.6 million to the counterparties . an effectiveness test was performed as of the settlement date and it was concluded that a highly effective cash flow hedge was still in place for the expected debt offering . of the amount paid in settlement , approximately $ 700000 was immediately reclassified to interest expense , as the result of partial ineffectiveness calculated at the settlement date . the net amount of $ 13.9 million was recorded in other comprehensive income ( 201coci 201d ) and is being recognized through interest expense over the life of the hedged debt offering , which took place in may 2008 . the remaining unamortized amount included as a reduction to accumulated oci as of december 31 , 2009 is $ 9.3 million . in august 2005 , we entered into $ 300.0 million of cash flow hedges through forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge interest rates on $ 300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2007 . the swaps qualified for hedge accounting , with any changes in fair value recorded in oci . in conjunction with the september 2007 issuance of $ 300.0 million of senior unsecured notes , we terminated these cash flow hedges as designated . the settlement amount received of $ 10.7 million is being recognized to earnings through a reduction of interest expense over the term of the hedged cash flows . the remaining unamortized amount included as an increase to accumulated oci as of december 31 , 2009 is $ 8.2 million . the ineffective portion of the hedge was insignificant . the effectiveness of our hedges is evaluated throughout their lives using the hypothetical derivative method under which the change in fair value of the actual swap designated as the hedging instrument is compared to the change in fair value of a hypothetical swap . we had no material interest rate derivatives , when considering both fair value and notional amount , at december 31 , 2009. .
Conversations:
Question: what is the net change of compensation cost recognized for rsus from 2008 to 2009?
Answer:

Answer: 2.4


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 70| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 the following table summarizes transactions for our rsus , excluding dividend equivalents , for 2009 : weighted average number of grant date restricted stock units rsus fair value .

1	restricted stock units	number of rsus	weighted average grant date fair value

2	rsus at december 31 2008	401375	$ 29.03

3	granted	1583616	$ 9.32

4	vested	-129352 ( 129352 )	$ 28.39

5	forfeited	-172033 ( 172033 )	$ 12.53

6	rsus at december 31 2009	1683606	$ 12.23

 compensation cost recognized for rsus totaled $ 7.3 million , $ 4.9 million and $ 3.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 6.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested rsus granted under the plan , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years . ( 14 ) financial instruments we are exposed to capital market risk , such as changes in interest rates . in an effort to manage interest rate risk , we may enter into interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time . we do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes . in november 2007 , we entered into forward starting interest swaps with notional amounts appropriate to hedge interest rates on $ 300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2009 . the forward starting swaps were appropriately designated and tested for effectiveness as cash flow hedges . in march 2008 , we settled the forward starting swaps and made a cash payment of $ 14.6 million to the counterparties . an effectiveness test was performed as of the settlement date and it was concluded that a highly effective cash flow hedge was still in place for the expected debt offering . of the amount paid in settlement , approximately $ 700000 was immediately reclassified to interest expense , as the result of partial ineffectiveness calculated at the settlement date . the net amount of $ 13.9 million was recorded in other comprehensive income ( 201coci 201d ) and is being recognized through interest expense over the life of the hedged debt offering , which took place in may 2008 . the remaining unamortized amount included as a reduction to accumulated oci as of december 31 , 2009 is $ 9.3 million . in august 2005 , we entered into $ 300.0 million of cash flow hedges through forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge interest rates on $ 300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2007 . the swaps qualified for hedge accounting , with any changes in fair value recorded in oci . in conjunction with the september 2007 issuance of $ 300.0 million of senior unsecured notes , we terminated these cash flow hedges as designated . the settlement amount received of $ 10.7 million is being recognized to earnings through a reduction of interest expense over the term of the hedged cash flows . the remaining unamortized amount included as an increase to accumulated oci as of december 31 , 2009 is $ 8.2 million . the ineffective portion of the hedge was insignificant . the effectiveness of our hedges is evaluated throughout their lives using the hypothetical derivative method under which the change in fair value of the actual swap designated as the hedging instrument is compared to the change in fair value of a hypothetical swap . we had no material interest rate derivatives , when considering both fair value and notional amount , at december 31 , 2009. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the net change of compensation cost recognized for rsus from 2008 to 2009? {answer0}
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer:

Answer: 0.4898


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

1		december 29 2001	december 28 2002	january 3 2004	january 1 2005	december 31 2005	december 30 2006

2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	54.38	81.52	61.65	75.54	79.96

3	s & p 500	100.00	77.90	100.24	111.15	116.61	135.03

4	nasdaq composite	100.00	71.97	107.18	117.07	120.50	137.02

5	s & p information technology	100.00	62.59	92.14	94.50	95.44	103.47

 .
Conversations:
Question: what was the performance value of the cadence design systems inc in 2004?
Answer:

Answer: 81.52


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

1		december 29 2001	december 28 2002	january 3 2004	january 1 2005	december 31 2005	december 30 2006

2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	54.38	81.52	61.65	75.54	79.96

3	s & p 500	100.00	77.90	100.24	111.15	116.61	135.03

4	nasdaq composite	100.00	71.97	107.18	117.07	120.50	137.02

5	s & p information technology	100.00	62.59	92.14	94.50	95.44	103.47

 .
Conversations:
q0: what was the performance value of the cadence design systems inc in 2004? {answer0}
Question: what was, then, the change in its performance value, considering 2004 and the original amount invested in it in 2001?
Answer:

Answer: -18.48


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

1		december 29 2001	december 28 2002	january 3 2004	january 1 2005	december 31 2005	december 30 2006

2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	54.38	81.52	61.65	75.54	79.96

3	s & p 500	100.00	77.90	100.24	111.15	116.61	135.03

4	nasdaq composite	100.00	71.97	107.18	117.07	120.50	137.02

5	s & p information technology	100.00	62.59	92.14	94.50	95.44	103.47

 .
Conversations:
q0: what was the performance value of the cadence design systems inc in 2004? {answer0}
q1: what was, then, the change in its performance value, considering 2004 and the original amount invested in it in 2001? {answer1}
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that original amount invested?
Answer:

Answer: -0.1848


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

1		2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015

2	loews common stock	100.0	97.37	106.04	126.23	110.59	101.72

3	s&p 500 index	100.0	102.11	118.45	156.82	178.29	180.75

4	loews peer group ( a )	100.0	101.59	115.19	145.12	152.84	144.70

 ( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .
Conversations:
Question: from 2010 to 2011, what was the change in the value of the loews common stock?
Answer:

Answer: -2.63


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

1		2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015

2	loews common stock	100.0	97.37	106.04	126.23	110.59	101.72

3	s&p 500 index	100.0	102.11	118.45	156.82	178.29	180.75

4	loews peer group ( a )	100.0	101.59	115.19	145.12	152.84	144.70

 ( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .
Conversations:
q0: from 2010 to 2011, what was the change in the value of the loews common stock? {answer0}
Question: and what was this change as a portion of the 2010 value of that stock?
Answer:

Answer: -0.0263


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

1		2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015

2	loews common stock	100.0	97.37	106.04	126.23	110.59	101.72

3	s&p 500 index	100.0	102.11	118.45	156.82	178.29	180.75

4	loews peer group ( a )	100.0	101.59	115.19	145.12	152.84	144.70

 ( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .
Conversations:
q0: from 2010 to 2011, what was the change in the value of the loews common stock? {answer0}
q1: and what was this change as a portion of the 2010 value of that stock? {answer1}
Question: and from 2010 to 2012, what was the change in the value of that stock?
Answer:

Answer: 6.04


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

1		2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015

2	loews common stock	100.0	97.37	106.04	126.23	110.59	101.72

3	s&p 500 index	100.0	102.11	118.45	156.82	178.29	180.75

4	loews peer group ( a )	100.0	101.59	115.19	145.12	152.84	144.70

 ( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .
Conversations:
q0: from 2010 to 2011, what was the change in the value of the loews common stock? {answer0}
q1: and what was this change as a portion of the 2010 value of that stock? {answer1}
q2: and from 2010 to 2012, what was the change in the value of that stock? {answer2}
Question: how much did this change represent in relation to that 2010 value?
Answer:

Answer: 0.0604


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: largest operators of open-loop and closed-loop retail electronic payments networks the largest operators of open-loop and closed-loop retail electronic payments networks are visa , mastercard , american express , discover , jcb and diners club . with the exception of discover , which primarily operates in the united states , all of the other network operators can be considered multi- national or global providers of payments network services . based on payments volume , total volume , number of transactions and number of cards in circulation , visa is the largest retail electronic payments network in the world . the following chart compares our network with those of our major competitors for calendar year 2007 : company payments volume volume transactions cards ( billions ) ( billions ) ( billions ) ( millions ) visa inc. ( 1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2457 $ 3822 50.3 1592 .

1	company	payments volume ( billions )	total volume ( billions )	total transactions ( billions )	cards ( millions )

2	visa inc. ( 1 )	$ 2457	$ 3822	50.3	1592

3	mastercard	1697	2276	27.0	916

4	american express	637	647	5.0	86

5	discover	102	119	1.6	57

6	jcb	55	61	0.6	58

7	diners club	29	30	0.2	7

 ( 1 ) visa inc . figures as reported previously in our filings . source : the nilson report , issue 902 ( may 2008 ) and issue 903 ( may 2008 ) . note : visa inc . figures exclude visa europe . figures for competitors include their respective european operations . visa figures include visa , visa electron , and interlink brands . visa cards include plus proprietary cards , but proprietary plus cash volume is not included . domestic china figures are excluded . mastercard figures include pin-based debit card figures on mastercard cards , but not maestro or cirrus figures . china commercial funds transfers are excluded . american express and discover include business from third-party issuers . jcb figures are for april 2006 through march 2007 , but cards and outlets are as of september 2007 . jcb total transaction figures are estimates . our primary operations we generate revenue from the transaction processing services we offer to our customers . our customers deliver visa products and payment services to consumers and merchants based on the product platforms we define and manage . payments network management is a core part of our operations , as it ensures that our payments system provides a safe , efficient , consistent , and interoperable service to cardholders , merchants , and financial institutions worldwide . transaction processing services core processing services our core processing services involve the routing of payment information and related data to facilitate the authorization , clearing and settlement of transactions between visa issuers , which are the financial institutions that issue visa cards to cardholders , and acquirers , which are the financial institutions that offer visa network connectivity and payments acceptance services to merchants . in addition , we offer a range of value-added processing services to support our customers 2019 visa programs and to promote the growth and security of the visa payments network . authorization is the process of approving or declining a transaction before a purchase is finalized or cash is disbursed . clearing is the process of delivering final transaction data from an acquirer to an issuer for posting to the cardholder 2019s account , the calculation of certain fees and charges that apply to the issuer and acquirer involved in the transaction , and the conversion of transaction amounts to the .
Conversations:
Question: what was the total payment volume for american express, in billions?
Answer:

Answer: 637.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: largest operators of open-loop and closed-loop retail electronic payments networks the largest operators of open-loop and closed-loop retail electronic payments networks are visa , mastercard , american express , discover , jcb and diners club . with the exception of discover , which primarily operates in the united states , all of the other network operators can be considered multi- national or global providers of payments network services . based on payments volume , total volume , number of transactions and number of cards in circulation , visa is the largest retail electronic payments network in the world . the following chart compares our network with those of our major competitors for calendar year 2007 : company payments volume volume transactions cards ( billions ) ( billions ) ( billions ) ( millions ) visa inc. ( 1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2457 $ 3822 50.3 1592 .

1	company	payments volume ( billions )	total volume ( billions )	total transactions ( billions )	cards ( millions )

2	visa inc. ( 1 )	$ 2457	$ 3822	50.3	1592

3	mastercard	1697	2276	27.0	916

4	american express	637	647	5.0	86

5	discover	102	119	1.6	57

6	jcb	55	61	0.6	58

7	diners club	29	30	0.2	7

 ( 1 ) visa inc . figures as reported previously in our filings . source : the nilson report , issue 902 ( may 2008 ) and issue 903 ( may 2008 ) . note : visa inc . figures exclude visa europe . figures for competitors include their respective european operations . visa figures include visa , visa electron , and interlink brands . visa cards include plus proprietary cards , but proprietary plus cash volume is not included . domestic china figures are excluded . mastercard figures include pin-based debit card figures on mastercard cards , but not maestro or cirrus figures . china commercial funds transfers are excluded . american express and discover include business from third-party issuers . jcb figures are for april 2006 through march 2007 , but cards and outlets are as of september 2007 . jcb total transaction figures are estimates . our primary operations we generate revenue from the transaction processing services we offer to our customers . our customers deliver visa products and payment services to consumers and merchants based on the product platforms we define and manage . payments network management is a core part of our operations , as it ensures that our payments system provides a safe , efficient , consistent , and interoperable service to cardholders , merchants , and financial institutions worldwide . transaction processing services core processing services our core processing services involve the routing of payment information and related data to facilitate the authorization , clearing and settlement of transactions between visa issuers , which are the financial institutions that issue visa cards to cardholders , and acquirers , which are the financial institutions that offer visa network connectivity and payments acceptance services to merchants . in addition , we offer a range of value-added processing services to support our customers 2019 visa programs and to promote the growth and security of the visa payments network . authorization is the process of approving or declining a transaction before a purchase is finalized or cash is disbursed . clearing is the process of delivering final transaction data from an acquirer to an issuer for posting to the cardholder 2019s account , the calculation of certain fees and charges that apply to the issuer and acquirer involved in the transaction , and the conversion of transaction amounts to the .
Conversations:
q0: what was the total payment volume for american express, in billions? {answer0}
Question: and what was the average volume per transaction?
Answer:

Answer: 127.4


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: largest operators of open-loop and closed-loop retail electronic payments networks the largest operators of open-loop and closed-loop retail electronic payments networks are visa , mastercard , american express , discover , jcb and diners club . with the exception of discover , which primarily operates in the united states , all of the other network operators can be considered multi- national or global providers of payments network services . based on payments volume , total volume , number of transactions and number of cards in circulation , visa is the largest retail electronic payments network in the world . the following chart compares our network with those of our major competitors for calendar year 2007 : company payments volume volume transactions cards ( billions ) ( billions ) ( billions ) ( millions ) visa inc. ( 1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2457 $ 3822 50.3 1592 .

1	company	payments volume ( billions )	total volume ( billions )	total transactions ( billions )	cards ( millions )

2	visa inc. ( 1 )	$ 2457	$ 3822	50.3	1592

3	mastercard	1697	2276	27.0	916

4	american express	637	647	5.0	86

5	discover	102	119	1.6	57

6	jcb	55	61	0.6	58

7	diners club	29	30	0.2	7

 ( 1 ) visa inc . figures as reported previously in our filings . source : the nilson report , issue 902 ( may 2008 ) and issue 903 ( may 2008 ) . note : visa inc . figures exclude visa europe . figures for competitors include their respective european operations . visa figures include visa , visa electron , and interlink brands . visa cards include plus proprietary cards , but proprietary plus cash volume is not included . domestic china figures are excluded . mastercard figures include pin-based debit card figures on mastercard cards , but not maestro or cirrus figures . china commercial funds transfers are excluded . american express and discover include business from third-party issuers . jcb figures are for april 2006 through march 2007 , but cards and outlets are as of september 2007 . jcb total transaction figures are estimates . our primary operations we generate revenue from the transaction processing services we offer to our customers . our customers deliver visa products and payment services to consumers and merchants based on the product platforms we define and manage . payments network management is a core part of our operations , as it ensures that our payments system provides a safe , efficient , consistent , and interoperable service to cardholders , merchants , and financial institutions worldwide . transaction processing services core processing services our core processing services involve the routing of payment information and related data to facilitate the authorization , clearing and settlement of transactions between visa issuers , which are the financial institutions that issue visa cards to cardholders , and acquirers , which are the financial institutions that offer visa network connectivity and payments acceptance services to merchants . in addition , we offer a range of value-added processing services to support our customers 2019 visa programs and to promote the growth and security of the visa payments network . authorization is the process of approving or declining a transaction before a purchase is finalized or cash is disbursed . clearing is the process of delivering final transaction data from an acquirer to an issuer for posting to the cardholder 2019s account , the calculation of certain fees and charges that apply to the issuer and acquirer involved in the transaction , and the conversion of transaction amounts to the .
Conversations:
q0: what was the total payment volume for american express, in billions? {answer0}
q1: and what was the average volume per transaction? {answer1}
Question: and what was this average volume for the jcb, also in billions?
Answer:

Answer: 91.66667


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: during the fourth quarter of 2010 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) guaranteed notes due under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) . during the first quarter of 2009 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) guaranteed notes due 2014 under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . 0160 on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 . on july 21 , 2011 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an extension of this repurchase program to december 31 , 2013 . schlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the activity under this share repurchase program during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 : ( stated in thousands except per share amounts ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share .

1		total cost of shares purchased	total number of shares purchased	average price paid per share

2	2012	$ 971883	14087.8	$ 68.99

3	2011	$ 2997688	36940.4	$ 81.15

4	2010	$ 1716675	26624.8	$ 64.48

 0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 6.8 billion in 2012 , $ 6.1 billion in 2011 and $ 5.5 billion in 2010 . in recent years , schlumberger has actively managed its activity levels in venezuela relative to its accounts receivable balance , and has recently experienced an increased delay in payment from its national oil company customer there . schlumberger operates in approximately 85 countries . at december 31 , 2012 , only five of those countries ( including venezuela ) individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one , the united states , represented greater than 10% ( 10 % ) . 0160 dividends paid during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 1.43 billion , $ 1.30 billion and $ 1.04 billion , respectively . on january 17 , 2013 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 13.6% ( 13.6 % ) , to $ 0.3125 . on january 19 , 2012 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 0.275 . on january 21 , 2011 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 19% ( 19 % ) , to $ 0.25 . 0160 capital expenditures were $ 4.7 billion in 2012 , $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 2.9 billion in 2010 . capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 3.9 billion for the full year 2013 . 0160 during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 schlumberger made contributions of $ 673 million , $ 601 million and $ 868 million , respectively , to its postretirement benefit plans . the us pension plans were 82% ( 82 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 87% ( 87 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger 2019s international defined benefit pension plans are a combined 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger currently anticipates contributing approximately $ 650 million to its postretirement benefit plans in 2013 , subject to market and business conditions . 0160 there were $ 321 million outstanding series b debentures at december 31 , 2009 . during 2010 , the remaining $ 320 million of the 2.125% ( 2.125 % ) series b convertible debentures due june 1 , 2023 were converted by holders into 8.0 million shares of schlumberger common stock and the remaining $ 1 million of outstanding series b debentures were redeemed for cash. .
Conversations:
Question: what was the change in the average price per share from 2010 to 2011?
Answer:

Answer: 16.67


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: during the fourth quarter of 2010 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) guaranteed notes due under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) . during the first quarter of 2009 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) guaranteed notes due 2014 under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . 0160 on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 . on july 21 , 2011 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an extension of this repurchase program to december 31 , 2013 . schlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the activity under this share repurchase program during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 : ( stated in thousands except per share amounts ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share .

1		total cost of shares purchased	total number of shares purchased	average price paid per share

2	2012	$ 971883	14087.8	$ 68.99

3	2011	$ 2997688	36940.4	$ 81.15

4	2010	$ 1716675	26624.8	$ 64.48

 0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 6.8 billion in 2012 , $ 6.1 billion in 2011 and $ 5.5 billion in 2010 . in recent years , schlumberger has actively managed its activity levels in venezuela relative to its accounts receivable balance , and has recently experienced an increased delay in payment from its national oil company customer there . schlumberger operates in approximately 85 countries . at december 31 , 2012 , only five of those countries ( including venezuela ) individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one , the united states , represented greater than 10% ( 10 % ) . 0160 dividends paid during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 1.43 billion , $ 1.30 billion and $ 1.04 billion , respectively . on january 17 , 2013 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 13.6% ( 13.6 % ) , to $ 0.3125 . on january 19 , 2012 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 0.275 . on january 21 , 2011 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 19% ( 19 % ) , to $ 0.25 . 0160 capital expenditures were $ 4.7 billion in 2012 , $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 2.9 billion in 2010 . capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 3.9 billion for the full year 2013 . 0160 during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 schlumberger made contributions of $ 673 million , $ 601 million and $ 868 million , respectively , to its postretirement benefit plans . the us pension plans were 82% ( 82 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 87% ( 87 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger 2019s international defined benefit pension plans are a combined 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger currently anticipates contributing approximately $ 650 million to its postretirement benefit plans in 2013 , subject to market and business conditions . 0160 there were $ 321 million outstanding series b debentures at december 31 , 2009 . during 2010 , the remaining $ 320 million of the 2.125% ( 2.125 % ) series b convertible debentures due june 1 , 2023 were converted by holders into 8.0 million shares of schlumberger common stock and the remaining $ 1 million of outstanding series b debentures were redeemed for cash. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the change in the average price per share from 2010 to 2011? {answer0}
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that average price in 2010?
Answer:

Answer: 0.25853


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

1		december 29 2001	december 28 2002	january 3 2004	january 1 2005	december 31 2005	december 30 2006

2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	54.38	81.52	61.65	75.54	79.96

3	s & p 500	100.00	77.90	100.24	111.15	116.61	135.03

4	nasdaq composite	100.00	71.97	107.18	117.07	120.50	137.02

5	s & p information technology	100.00	62.59	92.14	94.50	95.44	103.47

 .
Conversations:
Question: what is the value of the s&p 500 in 2005 less an assumed initial $100 investment?
Answer:

Answer: 11.15


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

1		december 29 2001	december 28 2002	january 3 2004	january 1 2005	december 31 2005	december 30 2006

2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	54.38	81.52	61.65	75.54	79.96

3	s & p 500	100.00	77.90	100.24	111.15	116.61	135.03

4	nasdaq composite	100.00	71.97	107.18	117.07	120.50	137.02

5	s & p information technology	100.00	62.59	92.14	94.50	95.44	103.47

 .
Conversations:
q0: what is the value of the s&p 500 in 2005 less an assumed initial $100 investment? {answer0}
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer:

Answer: 0.1115


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .

1		12/09	12/10	12/11	12/12	12/13	12/14

2	e*trade financial corporation	100.00	90.91	45.23	50.85	111.59	137.81

3	s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.49	136.30	180.44	205.14

4	dow jones us financials index	100.00	112.72	98.24	124.62	167.26	191.67

 table of contents .
Conversations:
Question: what is the price of e*trade financial corporation in 2014?
Answer:

Answer: 137.81


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .

1		12/09	12/10	12/11	12/12	12/13	12/14

2	e*trade financial corporation	100.00	90.91	45.23	50.85	111.59	137.81

3	s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.49	136.30	180.44	205.14

4	dow jones us financials index	100.00	112.72	98.24	124.62	167.26	191.67

 table of contents .
Conversations:
q0: what is the price of e*trade financial corporation in 2014? {answer0}
Question: what is that less 100?
Answer:

Answer: 37.81


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .

1		12/09	12/10	12/11	12/12	12/13	12/14

2	e*trade financial corporation	100.00	90.91	45.23	50.85	111.59	137.81

3	s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.49	136.30	180.44	205.14

4	dow jones us financials index	100.00	112.72	98.24	124.62	167.26	191.67

 table of contents .
Conversations:
q0: what is the price of e*trade financial corporation in 2014? {answer0}
q1: what is that less 100? {answer1}
Question: what is the change over 100?
Answer:

Answer: 0.3781


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: jpmorgan chase & co . / 2007 annual report 31 the following section provides a comparative discussion of jpmorgan chase 2019s consolidated results of operations on a reported basis for the three-year period ended december 31 , 2007 . factors that relate primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment than they are in this consolidated sec- tion . for a discussion of the critical accounting estimates used by the firm that affect the consolidated results of operations , see pages 96 201398 of this annual report . revenue .

1	year ended december 31 ( in millions )	2007	2006	2005

2	investment banking fees	$ 6635	$ 5520	$ 4088

3	principal transactions	9015	10778	8072

4	lending & deposit-related fees	3938	3468	3389

5	asset management administration and commissions	14356	11855	9988

6	securities gains ( losses )	164	-543 ( 543 )	-1336 ( 1336 )

7	mortgage fees and related income	2118	591	1054

8	credit card income	6911	6913	6754

9	other income	1829	2175	2684

10	noninterest revenue	44966	40757	34693

11	net interest income	26406	21242	19555

12	total net revenue	$ 71372	$ 61999	$ 54248

 2007 compared with 2006 total net revenue of $ 71.4 billion was up $ 9.4 billion , or 15% ( 15 % ) , from the prior year . higher net interest income , very strong private equity gains , record asset management , administration and commissions revenue , higher mortgage fees and related income and record investment banking fees contributed to the revenue growth . these increases were offset partially by lower trading revenue . investment banking fees grew in 2007 to a level higher than the pre- vious record set in 2006 . record advisory and equity underwriting fees drove the results , partially offset by lower debt underwriting fees . for a further discussion of investment banking fees , which are primarily recorded in ib , see the ib segment results on pages 40 201342 of this annual report . principal transactions revenue consists of trading revenue and private equity gains . trading revenue declined significantly from the 2006 level , primarily due to markdowns in ib of $ 1.4 billion ( net of hedges ) on subprime positions , including subprime cdos , and $ 1.3 billion ( net of fees ) on leveraged lending funded loans and unfunded commitments . also in ib , markdowns in securitized products on nonsubprime mortgages and weak credit trading performance more than offset record revenue in currencies and strong revenue in both rates and equities . equities benefited from strong client activity and record trading results across all products . ib 2019s credit portfolio results increased compared with the prior year , primarily driven by higher revenue from risk management activities . the increase in private equity gains from 2006 reflected a significantly higher level of gains , the classification of certain private equity carried interest as compensation expense and a fair value adjustment in the first quarter of 2007 on nonpublic private equity investments resulting from the adoption of sfas 157 ( 201cfair value measurements 201d ) . for a further discussion of principal transactions revenue , see the ib and corporate segment results on pages 40 201342 and 59 201360 , respectively , and note 6 on page 122 of this annual report . lending & deposit-related fees rose from the 2006 level , driven pri- marily by higher deposit-related fees and the bank of new york transaction . for a further discussion of lending & deposit-related fees , which are mostly recorded in rfs , tss and cb , see the rfs segment results on pages 43 201348 , the tss segment results on pages 54 201355 , and the cb segment results on pages 52 201353 of this annual report . asset management , administration and commissions revenue reached a level higher than the previous record set in 2006 . increased assets under management and higher performance and placement fees in am drove the record results . the 18% ( 18 % ) growth in assets under management from year-end 2006 came from net asset inflows and market appreciation across all segments : institutional , retail , private bank and private client services . tss also contributed to the rise in asset management , administration and commissions revenue , driven by increased product usage by new and existing clients and market appreciation on assets under custody . finally , commissions revenue increased , due mainly to higher brokerage transaction volume ( primarily included within fixed income and equity markets revenue of ib ) , which more than offset the sale of the insurance business by rfs in the third quarter of 2006 and a charge in the first quarter of 2007 resulting from accelerated surrenders of customer annuities . for additional information on these fees and commissions , see the segment discussions for ib on pages 40 201342 , rfs on pages 43 201348 , tss on pages 54 201355 , and am on pages 56 201358 , of this annual report . the favorable variance resulting from securities gains in 2007 compared with securities losses in 2006 was primarily driven by improvements in the results of repositioning of the treasury invest- ment securities portfolio . also contributing to the positive variance was a $ 234 million gain from the sale of mastercard shares . for a fur- ther discussion of securities gains ( losses ) , which are mostly recorded in the firm 2019s treasury business , see the corporate segment discussion on pages 59 201360 of this annual report . consol idated results of operat ions .
Conversations:
Question: what was the change in investment banking fees from 2005 to 2006?
Answer:

Answer: 1432.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: jpmorgan chase & co . / 2007 annual report 31 the following section provides a comparative discussion of jpmorgan chase 2019s consolidated results of operations on a reported basis for the three-year period ended december 31 , 2007 . factors that relate primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment than they are in this consolidated sec- tion . for a discussion of the critical accounting estimates used by the firm that affect the consolidated results of operations , see pages 96 201398 of this annual report . revenue .

1	year ended december 31 ( in millions )	2007	2006	2005

2	investment banking fees	$ 6635	$ 5520	$ 4088

3	principal transactions	9015	10778	8072

4	lending & deposit-related fees	3938	3468	3389

5	asset management administration and commissions	14356	11855	9988

6	securities gains ( losses )	164	-543 ( 543 )	-1336 ( 1336 )

7	mortgage fees and related income	2118	591	1054

8	credit card income	6911	6913	6754

9	other income	1829	2175	2684

10	noninterest revenue	44966	40757	34693

11	net interest income	26406	21242	19555

12	total net revenue	$ 71372	$ 61999	$ 54248

 2007 compared with 2006 total net revenue of $ 71.4 billion was up $ 9.4 billion , or 15% ( 15 % ) , from the prior year . higher net interest income , very strong private equity gains , record asset management , administration and commissions revenue , higher mortgage fees and related income and record investment banking fees contributed to the revenue growth . these increases were offset partially by lower trading revenue . investment banking fees grew in 2007 to a level higher than the pre- vious record set in 2006 . record advisory and equity underwriting fees drove the results , partially offset by lower debt underwriting fees . for a further discussion of investment banking fees , which are primarily recorded in ib , see the ib segment results on pages 40 201342 of this annual report . principal transactions revenue consists of trading revenue and private equity gains . trading revenue declined significantly from the 2006 level , primarily due to markdowns in ib of $ 1.4 billion ( net of hedges ) on subprime positions , including subprime cdos , and $ 1.3 billion ( net of fees ) on leveraged lending funded loans and unfunded commitments . also in ib , markdowns in securitized products on nonsubprime mortgages and weak credit trading performance more than offset record revenue in currencies and strong revenue in both rates and equities . equities benefited from strong client activity and record trading results across all products . ib 2019s credit portfolio results increased compared with the prior year , primarily driven by higher revenue from risk management activities . the increase in private equity gains from 2006 reflected a significantly higher level of gains , the classification of certain private equity carried interest as compensation expense and a fair value adjustment in the first quarter of 2007 on nonpublic private equity investments resulting from the adoption of sfas 157 ( 201cfair value measurements 201d ) . for a further discussion of principal transactions revenue , see the ib and corporate segment results on pages 40 201342 and 59 201360 , respectively , and note 6 on page 122 of this annual report . lending & deposit-related fees rose from the 2006 level , driven pri- marily by higher deposit-related fees and the bank of new york transaction . for a further discussion of lending & deposit-related fees , which are mostly recorded in rfs , tss and cb , see the rfs segment results on pages 43 201348 , the tss segment results on pages 54 201355 , and the cb segment results on pages 52 201353 of this annual report . asset management , administration and commissions revenue reached a level higher than the previous record set in 2006 . increased assets under management and higher performance and placement fees in am drove the record results . the 18% ( 18 % ) growth in assets under management from year-end 2006 came from net asset inflows and market appreciation across all segments : institutional , retail , private bank and private client services . tss also contributed to the rise in asset management , administration and commissions revenue , driven by increased product usage by new and existing clients and market appreciation on assets under custody . finally , commissions revenue increased , due mainly to higher brokerage transaction volume ( primarily included within fixed income and equity markets revenue of ib ) , which more than offset the sale of the insurance business by rfs in the third quarter of 2006 and a charge in the first quarter of 2007 resulting from accelerated surrenders of customer annuities . for additional information on these fees and commissions , see the segment discussions for ib on pages 40 201342 , rfs on pages 43 201348 , tss on pages 54 201355 , and am on pages 56 201358 , of this annual report . the favorable variance resulting from securities gains in 2007 compared with securities losses in 2006 was primarily driven by improvements in the results of repositioning of the treasury invest- ment securities portfolio . also contributing to the positive variance was a $ 234 million gain from the sale of mastercard shares . for a fur- ther discussion of securities gains ( losses ) , which are mostly recorded in the firm 2019s treasury business , see the corporate segment discussion on pages 59 201360 of this annual report . consol idated results of operat ions .
Conversations:
q0: what was the change in investment banking fees from 2005 to 2006? {answer0}
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to those fees in 2005, in percentage?
Answer:

Answer: 0.35029


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 . acquisitions ( continued ) was recorded to goodwill . the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : .

1	current assets	$ 28.1

2	property and equipment net	0.2

3	goodwill	258.9

4	ipr&d	190.0

5	current liabilities assumed	-32.9 ( 32.9 )

6	deferred income taxes	-66.0 ( 66.0 )

7	contingent consideration	-30.3 ( 30.3 )

8	total cash purchase price	348.0

9	less : cash acquired	-27.9 ( 27.9 )

10	total cash purchase price net of cash acquired	$ 320.1

 goodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition . goodwill was assigned to the company 2019s united states segment and is not deductible for tax purposes . ipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods . the fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach . this approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return . the discount rate used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d was 16.5% ( 16.5 % ) . completion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies and human clinical studies are required prior to selling any product . the risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time include those related to the design , development , and manufacturability of the product , the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies , and the timing of regulatory approvals . the valuation assumed $ 97.7 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction , and the company does not currently anticipate significant changes to forecasted research and development expenditures associated with the cardiaq program . the company 2019s valuation model also assumed net cash inflows would commence in late 2018 , if successful clinical trial experiences lead to a ce mark approval . upon completion of development , the underlying research and development intangible asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life . the company disclosed in early february 2017 that it had voluntarily paused enrollment in its clinical trials for the edwards-cardiaq valve to perform further design validation testing on a feature of the valve . this testing has been completed and , in collaboration with clinical investigators , the company has decided to resume screening patients for enrollment in its clinical trials . the results of operations for cardiaq have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition . pro forma results have not been presented as the results of cardiaq are not material in relation to the consolidated financial statements of the company . 8 . goodwill and other intangible assets on july 3 , 2015 , the company acquired cardiaq ( see note 7 ) . this transaction resulted in an increase to goodwill of $ 258.9 million and ipr&d of $ 190.0 million. .
Conversations:
Question: what is the amount of the goodwill?
Answer:

Answer: 258.9