Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 62 general mills amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss unrealized losses from interest rate cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , totaled $ 73.6 million after tax . these deferred losses are primarily related to interest rate swaps that we entered into in contemplation of future borrowings and other financ- ing requirements and that are being reclassified into net interest over the lives of the hedged forecasted transac- tions . unrealized losses from foreign currency cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , were $ 1.7 million after-tax . the net amount of pre-tax gains and losses in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , that we expect to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months is $ 14.0 million of expense . credit-risk-related contingent features certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rat- ing agencies . if our debt were to fall below investment grade , the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instru- ments in net liability positions . the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on may 27 , 2012 , was $ 19.9 million . we have posted col- lateral of $ 4.3 million in the normal course of business associated with these contracts . if the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on may 27 , 2012 , we would have been required to post an additional $ 15.6 million of collateral to counterparties . concentrations of credit and counterparty credit risk during fiscal 2012 , wal-mart stores , inc . and its affili- ates ( wal-mart ) accounted for 22 percent of our con- solidated net sales and 30 percent of our net sales in the u.s . retail segment . no other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated net sales . wal- mart also represented 6 percent of our net sales in the international segment and 7 percent of our net sales in the bakeries and foodservice segment . as of may 27 , 2012 , wal-mart accounted for 26 percent of our u.s . retail receivables , 5 percent of our international receiv- ables , and 9 percent of our bakeries and foodservice receivables . the five largest customers in our u.s . retail segment accounted for 54 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , the five largest customers in our international segment accounted for 26 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , and the five largest customers in our bakeries and foodservice segment accounted for 46 percent of its fis- cal 2012 net sales . we enter into interest rate , foreign exchange , and cer- tain commodity and equity derivatives , primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties . we continually monitor our positions and the credit rat- ings of the counterparties involved and , by policy , limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party . these transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties ; however , we have not incurred a material loss . we also enter into commodity futures transactions through vari- ous regulated exchanges . the amount of loss due to the credit risk of the coun- terparties , should the counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the contracts , is $ 19.5 million against which we do not hold collateral . under the terms of master swap agreements , some of our transactions require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to threshold levels of exposure and counterparty credit risk . collateral assets are either cash or u.s . treasury instruments and are held in a trust account that we may access if the counterparty defaults . note 8 . debt notes payable the components of notes payable and their respective weighted-average interest rates at the end of the periods were as follows: .

1	in millions	may 27 2012 notes payable	may 27 2012 weighted- average interest rate	may 27 2012 notespayable	weighted-averageinterest rate

2	u.s . commercial paper	$ 412.0	0.2% ( 0.2 % )	$ 192.5	0.2% ( 0.2 % )

3	financial institutions	114.5	10.0	118.8	11.5

4	total	$ 526.5	2.4% ( 2.4 % )	$ 311.3	4.5% ( 4.5 % )

 to ensure availability of funds , we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding short- term borrowings . commercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing . we have commercial paper programs available to us in the united states and europe . in april 2012 , we entered into fee-paid commit- ted credit lines , consisting of a $ 1.0 billion facility sched- uled to expire in april 2015 and a $ 1.7 billion facility .
Conversations:
q0: for the year ended on may 27, 2012, what was the total interest expense, in millions? {answer0}
Question: and as of that same date, what was the amount of notes payable related to u.s . commercial paper?
Answer:

Answer: 412.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 62 general mills amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss unrealized losses from interest rate cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , totaled $ 73.6 million after tax . these deferred losses are primarily related to interest rate swaps that we entered into in contemplation of future borrowings and other financ- ing requirements and that are being reclassified into net interest over the lives of the hedged forecasted transac- tions . unrealized losses from foreign currency cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , were $ 1.7 million after-tax . the net amount of pre-tax gains and losses in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , that we expect to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months is $ 14.0 million of expense . credit-risk-related contingent features certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rat- ing agencies . if our debt were to fall below investment grade , the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instru- ments in net liability positions . the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on may 27 , 2012 , was $ 19.9 million . we have posted col- lateral of $ 4.3 million in the normal course of business associated with these contracts . if the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on may 27 , 2012 , we would have been required to post an additional $ 15.6 million of collateral to counterparties . concentrations of credit and counterparty credit risk during fiscal 2012 , wal-mart stores , inc . and its affili- ates ( wal-mart ) accounted for 22 percent of our con- solidated net sales and 30 percent of our net sales in the u.s . retail segment . no other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated net sales . wal- mart also represented 6 percent of our net sales in the international segment and 7 percent of our net sales in the bakeries and foodservice segment . as of may 27 , 2012 , wal-mart accounted for 26 percent of our u.s . retail receivables , 5 percent of our international receiv- ables , and 9 percent of our bakeries and foodservice receivables . the five largest customers in our u.s . retail segment accounted for 54 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , the five largest customers in our international segment accounted for 26 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , and the five largest customers in our bakeries and foodservice segment accounted for 46 percent of its fis- cal 2012 net sales . we enter into interest rate , foreign exchange , and cer- tain commodity and equity derivatives , primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties . we continually monitor our positions and the credit rat- ings of the counterparties involved and , by policy , limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party . these transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties ; however , we have not incurred a material loss . we also enter into commodity futures transactions through vari- ous regulated exchanges . the amount of loss due to the credit risk of the coun- terparties , should the counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the contracts , is $ 19.5 million against which we do not hold collateral . under the terms of master swap agreements , some of our transactions require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to threshold levels of exposure and counterparty credit risk . collateral assets are either cash or u.s . treasury instruments and are held in a trust account that we may access if the counterparty defaults . note 8 . debt notes payable the components of notes payable and their respective weighted-average interest rates at the end of the periods were as follows: .

1	in millions	may 27 2012 notes payable	may 27 2012 weighted- average interest rate	may 27 2012 notespayable	weighted-averageinterest rate

2	u.s . commercial paper	$ 412.0	0.2% ( 0.2 % )	$ 192.5	0.2% ( 0.2 % )

3	financial institutions	114.5	10.0	118.8	11.5

4	total	$ 526.5	2.4% ( 2.4 % )	$ 311.3	4.5% ( 4.5 % )

 to ensure availability of funds , we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding short- term borrowings . commercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing . we have commercial paper programs available to us in the united states and europe . in april 2012 , we entered into fee-paid commit- ted credit lines , consisting of a $ 1.0 billion facility sched- uled to expire in april 2015 and a $ 1.7 billion facility .
Conversations:
q0: for the year ended on may 27, 2012, what was the total interest expense, in millions? {answer0}
q1: and as of that same date, what was the amount of notes payable related to u.s . commercial paper? {answer1}
Question: what was the full total of notes payable?
Answer:

Answer: 526.5


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 62 general mills amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss unrealized losses from interest rate cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , totaled $ 73.6 million after tax . these deferred losses are primarily related to interest rate swaps that we entered into in contemplation of future borrowings and other financ- ing requirements and that are being reclassified into net interest over the lives of the hedged forecasted transac- tions . unrealized losses from foreign currency cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , were $ 1.7 million after-tax . the net amount of pre-tax gains and losses in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , that we expect to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months is $ 14.0 million of expense . credit-risk-related contingent features certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rat- ing agencies . if our debt were to fall below investment grade , the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instru- ments in net liability positions . the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on may 27 , 2012 , was $ 19.9 million . we have posted col- lateral of $ 4.3 million in the normal course of business associated with these contracts . if the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on may 27 , 2012 , we would have been required to post an additional $ 15.6 million of collateral to counterparties . concentrations of credit and counterparty credit risk during fiscal 2012 , wal-mart stores , inc . and its affili- ates ( wal-mart ) accounted for 22 percent of our con- solidated net sales and 30 percent of our net sales in the u.s . retail segment . no other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated net sales . wal- mart also represented 6 percent of our net sales in the international segment and 7 percent of our net sales in the bakeries and foodservice segment . as of may 27 , 2012 , wal-mart accounted for 26 percent of our u.s . retail receivables , 5 percent of our international receiv- ables , and 9 percent of our bakeries and foodservice receivables . the five largest customers in our u.s . retail segment accounted for 54 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , the five largest customers in our international segment accounted for 26 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , and the five largest customers in our bakeries and foodservice segment accounted for 46 percent of its fis- cal 2012 net sales . we enter into interest rate , foreign exchange , and cer- tain commodity and equity derivatives , primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties . we continually monitor our positions and the credit rat- ings of the counterparties involved and , by policy , limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party . these transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties ; however , we have not incurred a material loss . we also enter into commodity futures transactions through vari- ous regulated exchanges . the amount of loss due to the credit risk of the coun- terparties , should the counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the contracts , is $ 19.5 million against which we do not hold collateral . under the terms of master swap agreements , some of our transactions require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to threshold levels of exposure and counterparty credit risk . collateral assets are either cash or u.s . treasury instruments and are held in a trust account that we may access if the counterparty defaults . note 8 . debt notes payable the components of notes payable and their respective weighted-average interest rates at the end of the periods were as follows: .

1	in millions	may 27 2012 notes payable	may 27 2012 weighted- average interest rate	may 27 2012 notespayable	weighted-averageinterest rate

2	u.s . commercial paper	$ 412.0	0.2% ( 0.2 % )	$ 192.5	0.2% ( 0.2 % )

3	financial institutions	114.5	10.0	118.8	11.5

4	total	$ 526.5	2.4% ( 2.4 % )	$ 311.3	4.5% ( 4.5 % )

 to ensure availability of funds , we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding short- term borrowings . commercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing . we have commercial paper programs available to us in the united states and europe . in april 2012 , we entered into fee-paid commit- ted credit lines , consisting of a $ 1.0 billion facility sched- uled to expire in april 2015 and a $ 1.7 billion facility .
Conversations:
q0: for the year ended on may 27, 2012, what was the total interest expense, in millions? {answer0}
q1: and as of that same date, what was the amount of notes payable related to u.s . commercial paper? {answer1}
q2: what was the full total of notes payable? {answer2}
Question: how much, then, in relation to this total did that amount represent?
Answer:

Answer: 0.78253


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

1	( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , 2015

2	net earnings attributable to pmi	$ 6035	$ 6967	$ 6873

3	less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	14	19	24

4	net earnings for basic and diluted eps	$ 6021	$ 6948	$ 6849

5	weighted-average shares for basic eps	1552	1551	1549

6	plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )	1	2014	2014

7	weighted-average shares for diluted eps	1553	1551	1549

 for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .
Conversations:
Question: what was the net change in value of net earnings attributable to pmi from 2016 to 2017?
Answer:

Answer: -932.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

1	( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , 2015

2	net earnings attributable to pmi	$ 6035	$ 6967	$ 6873

3	less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	14	19	24

4	net earnings for basic and diluted eps	$ 6021	$ 6948	$ 6849

5	weighted-average shares for basic eps	1552	1551	1549

6	plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )	1	2014	2014

7	weighted-average shares for diluted eps	1553	1551	1549

 for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the net change in value of net earnings attributable to pmi from 2016 to 2017? {answer0}
Question: what was the 2016 value?
Answer:

Answer: 6967.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

1	( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , 2015

2	net earnings attributable to pmi	$ 6035	$ 6967	$ 6873

3	less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	14	19	24

4	net earnings for basic and diluted eps	$ 6021	$ 6948	$ 6849

5	weighted-average shares for basic eps	1552	1551	1549

6	plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )	1	2014	2014

7	weighted-average shares for diluted eps	1553	1551	1549

 for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the net change in value of net earnings attributable to pmi from 2016 to 2017? {answer0}
q1: what was the 2016 value? {answer1}
Question: what is the change over the 2016 value?
Answer:

Answer: -0.13377


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 83 credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale business- es ( ib , cb , tss and am ) and consumer businesses ( rfs and cs ) . credit risk capital for the overall wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and declines in the portfolio value due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard . unexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which provisions for credit losses are maintained . the capital methodology is based upon several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation . credit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based upon product and other relevant risk segmentation . actual segment level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard . statistical results for certain segments or portfolios are adjusted to ensure that capital is consistent with external bench- marks , such as subordination levels on market transactions or capital held at representative monoline competitors , where appropriate . market risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market vari- ables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , securities prices and commodities prices . daily value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) , biweekly stress-test results and other factors are used to determine appropriate capital levels . the firm allocates market risk capital to each business segment according to a formula that weights that seg- ment 2019s var and stress-test exposures . see market risk management on pages 111 2013116 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures . operational risk capital capital is allocated to the lines of business for operational risk using a risk-based capital allocation methodology which estimates opera- tional risk on a bottom-up basis . the operational risk capital model is based upon actual losses and potential scenario-based stress losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment or the use of risk-transfer prod- ucts . the firm believes its model is consistent with the new basel ii framework . private equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately and publicly held securities , third-party fund investments and commitments in the private equity portfolio to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations . in addition to negative market fluctua- tions , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk . the capital allocation for the private equity portfolio is based upon measurement of the loss experience suffered by the firm and other market participants over a prolonged period of adverse equity market conditions . regulatory capital the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfederal reserve 201d ) establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company . the office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a . the federal reserve granted the firm , for a period of 18 months fol- lowing the bear stearns merger , relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the federal reserve 2019s risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to bear stearns 2019 risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired . the amount of such relief is subject to reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the merger and expires on october 1 , 2009 . the occ granted jpmorgan chase bank , n.a . similar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage requirements . jpmorgan chase maintained a well-capitalized position , based upon tier 1 and total capital ratios at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as indicated in the tables below . for more information , see note 30 on pages 212 2013213 of this annual report . risk-based capital components and assets .

1	december 31 ( in millions )	2008	2007

2	total tier 1capital ( a )	$ 136104	$ 88746

3	total tier 2 capital	48616	43496

4	total capital	$ 184720	$ 132242

5	risk-weighted assets	$ 1244659	$ 1051879

6	total adjusted average assets	1966895	1473541

 ( a ) the fasb has been deliberating certain amendments to both sfas 140 and fin 46r that may impact the accounting for transactions that involve qspes and vies . based on the provisions of the current proposal and the firm 2019s interpretation of the propos- al , the firm estimates that the impact of consolidation could be up to $ 70 billion of credit card receivables , $ 40 billion of assets related to firm-sponsored multi-seller conduits , and $ 50 billion of other loans ( including residential mortgages ) ; the decrease in the tier 1 capital ratio could be approximately 80 basis points . the ulti- mate impact could differ significantly due to the fasb 2019s continuing deliberations on the final requirements of the rule and market conditions. .
Conversations:
Question: in 2008, what percentage did the tier 2 capital represent in relation to the total one?
Answer:

Answer: 0.26319


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 83 credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale business- es ( ib , cb , tss and am ) and consumer businesses ( rfs and cs ) . credit risk capital for the overall wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and declines in the portfolio value due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard . unexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which provisions for credit losses are maintained . the capital methodology is based upon several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation . credit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based upon product and other relevant risk segmentation . actual segment level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard . statistical results for certain segments or portfolios are adjusted to ensure that capital is consistent with external bench- marks , such as subordination levels on market transactions or capital held at representative monoline competitors , where appropriate . market risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market vari- ables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , securities prices and commodities prices . daily value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) , biweekly stress-test results and other factors are used to determine appropriate capital levels . the firm allocates market risk capital to each business segment according to a formula that weights that seg- ment 2019s var and stress-test exposures . see market risk management on pages 111 2013116 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures . operational risk capital capital is allocated to the lines of business for operational risk using a risk-based capital allocation methodology which estimates opera- tional risk on a bottom-up basis . the operational risk capital model is based upon actual losses and potential scenario-based stress losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment or the use of risk-transfer prod- ucts . the firm believes its model is consistent with the new basel ii framework . private equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately and publicly held securities , third-party fund investments and commitments in the private equity portfolio to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations . in addition to negative market fluctua- tions , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk . the capital allocation for the private equity portfolio is based upon measurement of the loss experience suffered by the firm and other market participants over a prolonged period of adverse equity market conditions . regulatory capital the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfederal reserve 201d ) establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company . the office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a . the federal reserve granted the firm , for a period of 18 months fol- lowing the bear stearns merger , relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the federal reserve 2019s risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to bear stearns 2019 risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired . the amount of such relief is subject to reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the merger and expires on october 1 , 2009 . the occ granted jpmorgan chase bank , n.a . similar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage requirements . jpmorgan chase maintained a well-capitalized position , based upon tier 1 and total capital ratios at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as indicated in the tables below . for more information , see note 30 on pages 212 2013213 of this annual report . risk-based capital components and assets .

1	december 31 ( in millions )	2008	2007

2	total tier 1capital ( a )	$ 136104	$ 88746

3	total tier 2 capital	48616	43496

4	total capital	$ 184720	$ 132242

5	risk-weighted assets	$ 1244659	$ 1051879

6	total adjusted average assets	1966895	1473541

 ( a ) the fasb has been deliberating certain amendments to both sfas 140 and fin 46r that may impact the accounting for transactions that involve qspes and vies . based on the provisions of the current proposal and the firm 2019s interpretation of the propos- al , the firm estimates that the impact of consolidation could be up to $ 70 billion of credit card receivables , $ 40 billion of assets related to firm-sponsored multi-seller conduits , and $ 50 billion of other loans ( including residential mortgages ) ; the decrease in the tier 1 capital ratio could be approximately 80 basis points . the ulti- mate impact could differ significantly due to the fasb 2019s continuing deliberations on the final requirements of the rule and market conditions. .
Conversations:
q0: in 2008, what percentage did the tier 2 capital represent in relation to the total one? {answer0}
Question: and how much did it represent in relation to the total of risk-weighted assets?
Answer:

Answer: 0.03906


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit . the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal . network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies . the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units . such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded . as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively . rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .

1		2004	2003

2	acquired customer base and network location intangibles	$ 1369607	$ 1299521

3	deferred financing costs	89736	111484

4	acquired licenses and other intangibles	43404	43125

5	total	1502747	1454130

6	less accumulated amortization	-517444 ( 517444 )	-434381 ( 434381 )

7	other intangible assets net	$ 985303	$ 1019749

 the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively . 5 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .
Conversations:
Question: what was the difference in amortization expense between 2008 and 2009?
Answer:

Answer: 1.9


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit . the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal . network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies . the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units . such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded . as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively . rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .

1		2004	2003

2	acquired customer base and network location intangibles	$ 1369607	$ 1299521

3	deferred financing costs	89736	111484

4	acquired licenses and other intangibles	43404	43125

5	total	1502747	1454130

6	less accumulated amortization	-517444 ( 517444 )	-434381 ( 434381 )

7	other intangible assets net	$ 985303	$ 1019749

 the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively . 5 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .
Conversations:
q0: what was the difference in amortization expense between 2008 and 2009? {answer0}
Question: so what was the percentage change?
Answer:

Answer: 0.01981


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit . the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal . network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies . the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units . such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded . as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively . rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .

1		2004	2003

2	acquired customer base and network location intangibles	$ 1369607	$ 1299521

3	deferred financing costs	89736	111484

4	acquired licenses and other intangibles	43404	43125

5	total	1502747	1454130

6	less accumulated amortization	-517444 ( 517444 )	-434381 ( 434381 )

7	other intangible assets net	$ 985303	$ 1019749

 the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively . 5 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .
Conversations:
q0: what was the difference in amortization expense between 2008 and 2009? {answer0}
q1: so what was the percentage change? {answer1}
Question: how much did the other intangible assets net change between 2003 and 2004?
Answer:

Answer: -34446.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit . the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal . network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies . the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units . such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded . as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively . rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .

1		2004	2003

2	acquired customer base and network location intangibles	$ 1369607	$ 1299521

3	deferred financing costs	89736	111484

4	acquired licenses and other intangibles	43404	43125

5	total	1502747	1454130

6	less accumulated amortization	-517444 ( 517444 )	-434381 ( 434381 )

7	other intangible assets net	$ 985303	$ 1019749

 the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively . 5 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .
Conversations:
q0: what was the difference in amortization expense between 2008 and 2009? {answer0}
q1: so what was the percentage change? {answer1}
q2: how much did the other intangible assets net change between 2003 and 2004? {answer2}
Question: so what was the percentage decline during this time?
Answer:

Answer: -0.03378


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters , and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol "apd." as of 31 october 2019 , there were 5166 record holders of our common stock . cash dividends on the company 2019s common stock are paid quarterly . it is our expectation that we will continue to pay cash dividends in the future at comparable or increased levels . the board of directors determines whether to declare dividends and the timing and amount based on financial condition and other factors it deems relevant . dividend information for each quarter of fiscal years 2019 and 2018 is summarized below: .

1		2019	2018

2	first quarter	$ 1.10	$ .95

3	second quarter	1.16	1.10

4	third quarter	1.16	1.10

5	fourth quarter	1.16	1.10

6	total	$ 4.58	$ 4.25

 purchases of equity securities by the issuer on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1.0 billion of our outstanding common stock . this program does not have a stated expiration date . we repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with one or more brokers . there were no purchases of stock during fiscal year 2019 . at 30 september 2019 , $ 485.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained . additional purchases will be completed at the company 2019s discretion while maintaining sufficient funds for investing in its businesses and growth opportunities. .
Conversations:
Question: what percentage of the total dividend in 2019 is from the first quarter?
Answer:

Answer: 0.24017


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters , and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol "apd." as of 31 october 2019 , there were 5166 record holders of our common stock . cash dividends on the company 2019s common stock are paid quarterly . it is our expectation that we will continue to pay cash dividends in the future at comparable or increased levels . the board of directors determines whether to declare dividends and the timing and amount based on financial condition and other factors it deems relevant . dividend information for each quarter of fiscal years 2019 and 2018 is summarized below: .

1		2019	2018

2	first quarter	$ 1.10	$ .95

3	second quarter	1.16	1.10

4	third quarter	1.16	1.10

5	fourth quarter	1.16	1.10

6	total	$ 4.58	$ 4.25

 purchases of equity securities by the issuer on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1.0 billion of our outstanding common stock . this program does not have a stated expiration date . we repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with one or more brokers . there were no purchases of stock during fiscal year 2019 . at 30 september 2019 , $ 485.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained . additional purchases will be completed at the company 2019s discretion while maintaining sufficient funds for investing in its businesses and growth opportunities. .
Conversations:
q0: what percentage of the total dividend in 2019 is from the first quarter? {answer0}
Question: and what percentage of the total dividend in 2018 is from the first quarter?
Answer:

Answer: 0.22353


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters , and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol "apd." as of 31 october 2019 , there were 5166 record holders of our common stock . cash dividends on the company 2019s common stock are paid quarterly . it is our expectation that we will continue to pay cash dividends in the future at comparable or increased levels . the board of directors determines whether to declare dividends and the timing and amount based on financial condition and other factors it deems relevant . dividend information for each quarter of fiscal years 2019 and 2018 is summarized below: .

1		2019	2018

2	first quarter	$ 1.10	$ .95

3	second quarter	1.16	1.10

4	third quarter	1.16	1.10

5	fourth quarter	1.16	1.10

6	total	$ 4.58	$ 4.25

 purchases of equity securities by the issuer on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1.0 billion of our outstanding common stock . this program does not have a stated expiration date . we repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with one or more brokers . there were no purchases of stock during fiscal year 2019 . at 30 september 2019 , $ 485.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained . additional purchases will be completed at the company 2019s discretion while maintaining sufficient funds for investing in its businesses and growth opportunities. .
Conversations:
q0: what percentage of the total dividend in 2019 is from the first quarter? {answer0}
q1: and what percentage of the total dividend in 2018 is from the first quarter? {answer1}
Question: what is, then, the difference between the 2019 percentage and this 2018 one?
Answer:

Answer: 0.01665


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis .

1		12/31/05	12/31/06	12/31/07	12/31/08	12/31/09	12/31/10

2	ball corporation	$ 100.00	$ 110.86	$ 115.36	$ 107.58	$ 134.96	$ 178.93

3	dj containers & packaging index	$ 100.00	$ 112.09	$ 119.63	$ 75.00	$ 105.34	$ 123.56

4	s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 115.80	$ 122.16	$ 76.96	$ 97.33	$ 111.99

5	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )

6	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .

 .
Conversations:
Question: what is the price of ball corporation in 2010?
Answer:

Answer: 178.93


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis .

1		12/31/05	12/31/06	12/31/07	12/31/08	12/31/09	12/31/10

2	ball corporation	$ 100.00	$ 110.86	$ 115.36	$ 107.58	$ 134.96	$ 178.93

3	dj containers & packaging index	$ 100.00	$ 112.09	$ 119.63	$ 75.00	$ 105.34	$ 123.56

4	s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 115.80	$ 122.16	$ 76.96	$ 97.33	$ 111.99

5	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )

6	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .

 .
Conversations:
q0: what is the price of ball corporation in 2010? {answer0}
Question: what is that less an initial $100 investment?
Answer:

Answer: 78.93


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis .

1		12/31/05	12/31/06	12/31/07	12/31/08	12/31/09	12/31/10

2	ball corporation	$ 100.00	$ 110.86	$ 115.36	$ 107.58	$ 134.96	$ 178.93

3	dj containers & packaging index	$ 100.00	$ 112.09	$ 119.63	$ 75.00	$ 105.34	$ 123.56

4	s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 115.80	$ 122.16	$ 76.96	$ 97.33	$ 111.99

5	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )

6	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .

 .
Conversations:
q0: what is the price of ball corporation in 2010? {answer0}
q1: what is that less an initial $100 investment? {answer1}
Question: what is that difference over 100?
Answer:

Answer: 0.7893


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions . oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil . oneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million . the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes . for example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated . oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk . oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations . oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities . in addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided . when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk . at december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business . distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas . gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism . energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations . we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges . we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments . both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value . fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. .

1		( thousands of dollars )

2	net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007	$ 25171

3	derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period	-55874 ( 55874 )

4	fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period	236772

5	other changes in fair value	52731

6	net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )	$ 258800

 ( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy . the maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 . fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es .
Conversations:
Question: what was the total net change in net fair value of derivatives outstanding between 2007 and 2008?
Answer:

Answer: 233629.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions . oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil . oneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million . the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes . for example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated . oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk . oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations . oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities . in addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided . when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk . at december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business . distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas . gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism . energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations . we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges . we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments . both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value . fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. .

1		( thousands of dollars )

2	net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007	$ 25171

3	derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period	-55874 ( 55874 )

4	fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period	236772

5	other changes in fair value	52731

6	net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )	$ 258800

 ( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy . the maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 . fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es .
Conversations:
q0: what was the total net change in net fair value of derivatives outstanding between 2007 and 2008? {answer0}
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
Answer:

Answer: 9.28167


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .

1		total number of shares purchased	average price paid per share2	total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs

2	october 1-31	29704	$ 5.99	2014	2014

3	november 1-30	4468	$ 3.24	2014	2014

4	december 1-31	12850	$ 3.98	2014	2014

5	total1	47022	$ 5.18	2014	2014

 total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .
Conversations:
Question: what was the total value of the shares purchased in october?
Answer:

Answer: 177926.96


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .

1		total number of shares purchased	average price paid per share2	total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs

2	october 1-31	29704	$ 5.99	2014	2014

3	november 1-30	4468	$ 3.24	2014	2014

4	december 1-31	12850	$ 3.98	2014	2014

5	total1	47022	$ 5.18	2014	2014

 total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the total value of the shares purchased in october? {answer0}
Question: and what was it for november?
Answer:

Answer: 14476.32


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .

1		total number of shares purchased	average price paid per share2	total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs

2	october 1-31	29704	$ 5.99	2014	2014

3	november 1-30	4468	$ 3.24	2014	2014

4	december 1-31	12850	$ 3.98	2014	2014

5	total1	47022	$ 5.18	2014	2014

 total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the total value of the shares purchased in october? {answer0}
q1: and what was it for november? {answer1}
Question: how much does the october total value represent in relation to the november one?
Answer:

Answer: 12.2909


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .

1		total number of shares purchased	average price paid per share2	total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs

2	october 1-31	29704	$ 5.99	2014	2014

3	november 1-30	4468	$ 3.24	2014	2014

4	december 1-31	12850	$ 3.98	2014	2014

5	total1	47022	$ 5.18	2014	2014

 total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the total value of the shares purchased in october? {answer0}
q1: and what was it for november? {answer1}
q2: how much does the october total value represent in relation to the november one? {answer2}
Question: and how much is that in percentage?
Answer:

Answer: 1229.08971


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 . stockholders 2019 equity dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2015 , 2016 , and 2017 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) .

1	paymentdate	amountper share	totalamount ( in millions )

2	2015	$ 1.14	$ 170

3	2016	$ 1.16	$ 172

4	2017	$ 1.49	$ 216

 on november 2 , 2017 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share that was paid on january 26 , 2018 to stockholders of record on december 29 , 2017 , for an aggregate amount of $ 55 million . declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . stock repurchases in september 2014 , our board of directors replaced a previous share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion ( of which $ 816 million remained unused ) with an authorization for repurchases of up to $ 2 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , which expired on december 31 , 2016 . under the share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing . pursuant to the merger agreement , after july 2 , 2015 , we were prohibited from repurchasing any of our outstanding securities without the prior written consent of aetna , other than repurchases of shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting or settlement of outstanding restricted stock awards . accordingly , as announced on july 3 , 2015 , we suspended our share repurchase program . on february 14 , 2017 , we and aetna agreed to mutually terminate the merger agreement . we also announced that the board had approved a new authorization for share repurchases of up to $ 2.25 billion of our common stock exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on december 31 , 2017 . on february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co . llc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase program referred to above . on february 22 , 2017 , we made a payment of $ 1.5 billion to goldman sachs from available cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 5.83 million shares of our common stock from goldman sachs based on the then current market price of humana common stock . the payment to goldman sachs was recorded as a reduction to stockholders 2019 equity , consisting of a $ 1.2 billion increase in treasury stock , which reflected the value of the initial 5.83 million shares received upon initial settlement , and a $ 300 million decrease in capital in excess of par value , which reflected the value of stock held back by goldman sachs pending final settlement of the february 2017 asr . upon settlement of the february 2017 asr on august 28 , 2017 , we received an additional 0.84 million shares as determined by the average daily volume weighted-average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement of $ 224.81 , bringing the total shares received under this program to 6.67 million . in addition , upon settlement we reclassified the $ 300 million value of stock initially held back by goldman sachs from capital in excess of par value to treasury stock . subsequent to settlement of the february 2017 asr , we repurchased an additional 3.04 million shares in the open market , utilizing the remaining $ 750 million of the $ 2.25 billion authorization prior to expiration. .
Conversations:
Question: what is the ratio of the payment amount per share, 2017 to 2016?
Answer:

Answer: 1.28448


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 . stockholders 2019 equity dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2015 , 2016 , and 2017 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) .

1	paymentdate	amountper share	totalamount ( in millions )

2	2015	$ 1.14	$ 170

3	2016	$ 1.16	$ 172

4	2017	$ 1.49	$ 216

 on november 2 , 2017 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share that was paid on january 26 , 2018 to stockholders of record on december 29 , 2017 , for an aggregate amount of $ 55 million . declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . stock repurchases in september 2014 , our board of directors replaced a previous share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion ( of which $ 816 million remained unused ) with an authorization for repurchases of up to $ 2 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , which expired on december 31 , 2016 . under the share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing . pursuant to the merger agreement , after july 2 , 2015 , we were prohibited from repurchasing any of our outstanding securities without the prior written consent of aetna , other than repurchases of shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting or settlement of outstanding restricted stock awards . accordingly , as announced on july 3 , 2015 , we suspended our share repurchase program . on february 14 , 2017 , we and aetna agreed to mutually terminate the merger agreement . we also announced that the board had approved a new authorization for share repurchases of up to $ 2.25 billion of our common stock exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on december 31 , 2017 . on february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co . llc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase program referred to above . on february 22 , 2017 , we made a payment of $ 1.5 billion to goldman sachs from available cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 5.83 million shares of our common stock from goldman sachs based on the then current market price of humana common stock . the payment to goldman sachs was recorded as a reduction to stockholders 2019 equity , consisting of a $ 1.2 billion increase in treasury stock , which reflected the value of the initial 5.83 million shares received upon initial settlement , and a $ 300 million decrease in capital in excess of par value , which reflected the value of stock held back by goldman sachs pending final settlement of the february 2017 asr . upon settlement of the february 2017 asr on august 28 , 2017 , we received an additional 0.84 million shares as determined by the average daily volume weighted-average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement of $ 224.81 , bringing the total shares received under this program to 6.67 million . in addition , upon settlement we reclassified the $ 300 million value of stock initially held back by goldman sachs from capital in excess of par value to treasury stock . subsequent to settlement of the february 2017 asr , we repurchased an additional 3.04 million shares in the open market , utilizing the remaining $ 750 million of the $ 2.25 billion authorization prior to expiration. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the ratio of the payment amount per share, 2017 to 2016? {answer0}
Question: what is that less 1?
Answer:

Answer: 0.28448