Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the activity in our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31: .

1		2015	2014	2013

2	balance at beginning of year	$ 70.1	$ 72.0	$ 84.7

3	additions based on tax positions related to current year	0.2	0.8	0.3

4	additions for tax positions of prior years	1.4	5.0	11.4

5	reductions for tax positions of prior years	-10.2 ( 10.2 )	-6.0 ( 6.0 )	-2.4 ( 2.4 )

6	reductions for tax positions resulting from lapse of statute of limitations	-0.6 ( 0.6 )	-0.2 ( 0.2 )	-1.3 ( 1.3 )

7	settlements	-13.9 ( 13.9 )	-1.5 ( 1.5 )	-20.7 ( 20.7 )

8	balance at end of year	$ 47.0	$ 70.1	$ 72.0

 during 2015 , we settled tax matters in various states and puerto rico which reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 13.9 million . during 2014 , we settled tax matters in various jurisdictions and reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 1.5 million . during 2013 , we settled with the irs appeals division and the joint committee on taxation our 2009 and 2010 tax years . the resolution of these tax periods in addition to various state tax resolutions during the year reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 20.7 million . included in our gross unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 are $ 30.5 million and $ 45.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits ( net of the federal benefit on state matters ) that , if recognized , would affect our effective income tax rate in future periods . we recognize interest and penalties as incurred within the provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of income . related to the unrecognized tax benefits previously noted , we recorded interest expense of approximately $ 1.2 million during 2015 and , in total as of december 31 , 2015 , have recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 10.3 million . during 2014 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.5 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2014 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 18.7 million . during 2013 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.2 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2013 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 17.0 million . gross unrecognized benefits that we expect to settle in the following twelve months are in the range of $ 0 to $ 10 million ; however , it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may either increase or decrease in the next twelve months . we are currently under examination or administrative review by state and local taxing authorities for various tax years . these state audits are ongoing . we believe the recorded liabilities for uncertain tax positions are adequate . however , a significant assessment against us in excess of the liabilities recorded could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .
Conversations:
Question: what is the value of gross unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2015?
Answer:

Answer: 47.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the activity in our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31: .

1		2015	2014	2013

2	balance at beginning of year	$ 70.1	$ 72.0	$ 84.7

3	additions based on tax positions related to current year	0.2	0.8	0.3

4	additions for tax positions of prior years	1.4	5.0	11.4

5	reductions for tax positions of prior years	-10.2 ( 10.2 )	-6.0 ( 6.0 )	-2.4 ( 2.4 )

6	reductions for tax positions resulting from lapse of statute of limitations	-0.6 ( 0.6 )	-0.2 ( 0.2 )	-1.3 ( 1.3 )

7	settlements	-13.9 ( 13.9 )	-1.5 ( 1.5 )	-20.7 ( 20.7 )

8	balance at end of year	$ 47.0	$ 70.1	$ 72.0

 during 2015 , we settled tax matters in various states and puerto rico which reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 13.9 million . during 2014 , we settled tax matters in various jurisdictions and reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 1.5 million . during 2013 , we settled with the irs appeals division and the joint committee on taxation our 2009 and 2010 tax years . the resolution of these tax periods in addition to various state tax resolutions during the year reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 20.7 million . included in our gross unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 are $ 30.5 million and $ 45.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits ( net of the federal benefit on state matters ) that , if recognized , would affect our effective income tax rate in future periods . we recognize interest and penalties as incurred within the provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of income . related to the unrecognized tax benefits previously noted , we recorded interest expense of approximately $ 1.2 million during 2015 and , in total as of december 31 , 2015 , have recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 10.3 million . during 2014 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.5 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2014 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 18.7 million . during 2013 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.2 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2013 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 17.0 million . gross unrecognized benefits that we expect to settle in the following twelve months are in the range of $ 0 to $ 10 million ; however , it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may either increase or decrease in the next twelve months . we are currently under examination or administrative review by state and local taxing authorities for various tax years . these state audits are ongoing . we believe the recorded liabilities for uncertain tax positions are adequate . however , a significant assessment against us in excess of the liabilities recorded could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the value of gross unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2015? {answer0}
Question: what is the value at the end of 2014?
Answer:

Answer: 70.1


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the activity in our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31: .

1		2015	2014	2013

2	balance at beginning of year	$ 70.1	$ 72.0	$ 84.7

3	additions based on tax positions related to current year	0.2	0.8	0.3

4	additions for tax positions of prior years	1.4	5.0	11.4

5	reductions for tax positions of prior years	-10.2 ( 10.2 )	-6.0 ( 6.0 )	-2.4 ( 2.4 )

6	reductions for tax positions resulting from lapse of statute of limitations	-0.6 ( 0.6 )	-0.2 ( 0.2 )	-1.3 ( 1.3 )

7	settlements	-13.9 ( 13.9 )	-1.5 ( 1.5 )	-20.7 ( 20.7 )

8	balance at end of year	$ 47.0	$ 70.1	$ 72.0

 during 2015 , we settled tax matters in various states and puerto rico which reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 13.9 million . during 2014 , we settled tax matters in various jurisdictions and reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 1.5 million . during 2013 , we settled with the irs appeals division and the joint committee on taxation our 2009 and 2010 tax years . the resolution of these tax periods in addition to various state tax resolutions during the year reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 20.7 million . included in our gross unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 are $ 30.5 million and $ 45.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits ( net of the federal benefit on state matters ) that , if recognized , would affect our effective income tax rate in future periods . we recognize interest and penalties as incurred within the provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of income . related to the unrecognized tax benefits previously noted , we recorded interest expense of approximately $ 1.2 million during 2015 and , in total as of december 31 , 2015 , have recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 10.3 million . during 2014 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.5 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2014 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 18.7 million . during 2013 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.2 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2013 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 17.0 million . gross unrecognized benefits that we expect to settle in the following twelve months are in the range of $ 0 to $ 10 million ; however , it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may either increase or decrease in the next twelve months . we are currently under examination or administrative review by state and local taxing authorities for various tax years . these state audits are ongoing . we believe the recorded liabilities for uncertain tax positions are adequate . however , a significant assessment against us in excess of the liabilities recorded could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the value of gross unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2015? {answer0}
q1: what is the value at the end of 2014? {answer1}
Question: what is the 2015 value less the 2014?
Answer:

Answer: -23.1


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the activity in our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31: .

1		2015	2014	2013

2	balance at beginning of year	$ 70.1	$ 72.0	$ 84.7

3	additions based on tax positions related to current year	0.2	0.8	0.3

4	additions for tax positions of prior years	1.4	5.0	11.4

5	reductions for tax positions of prior years	-10.2 ( 10.2 )	-6.0 ( 6.0 )	-2.4 ( 2.4 )

6	reductions for tax positions resulting from lapse of statute of limitations	-0.6 ( 0.6 )	-0.2 ( 0.2 )	-1.3 ( 1.3 )

7	settlements	-13.9 ( 13.9 )	-1.5 ( 1.5 )	-20.7 ( 20.7 )

8	balance at end of year	$ 47.0	$ 70.1	$ 72.0

 during 2015 , we settled tax matters in various states and puerto rico which reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 13.9 million . during 2014 , we settled tax matters in various jurisdictions and reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 1.5 million . during 2013 , we settled with the irs appeals division and the joint committee on taxation our 2009 and 2010 tax years . the resolution of these tax periods in addition to various state tax resolutions during the year reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 20.7 million . included in our gross unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 are $ 30.5 million and $ 45.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits ( net of the federal benefit on state matters ) that , if recognized , would affect our effective income tax rate in future periods . we recognize interest and penalties as incurred within the provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of income . related to the unrecognized tax benefits previously noted , we recorded interest expense of approximately $ 1.2 million during 2015 and , in total as of december 31 , 2015 , have recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 10.3 million . during 2014 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.5 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2014 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 18.7 million . during 2013 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.2 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2013 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 17.0 million . gross unrecognized benefits that we expect to settle in the following twelve months are in the range of $ 0 to $ 10 million ; however , it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may either increase or decrease in the next twelve months . we are currently under examination or administrative review by state and local taxing authorities for various tax years . these state audits are ongoing . we believe the recorded liabilities for uncertain tax positions are adequate . however , a significant assessment against us in excess of the liabilities recorded could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the value of gross unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2015? {answer0}
q1: what is the value at the end of 2014? {answer1}
q2: what is the 2015 value less the 2014? {answer2}
Question: what is the net change over the 2014 value?
Answer:

Answer: -0.32953


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 on december 8 , 2017 , the board of directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $ 0.13 per share payable on february 15 , 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 1 , 2018 . stock repurchase program 2014 no shares were repurchased in 2017 . the cumulative repurchases from the commencement of the program in july 2010 through december 31 , 2017 totaled 154.3 million shares for a total cost of $ 1.9 billion , at an average price per share of $ 12.12 ( including a nominal amount of commissions ) . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 246 million remained available for repurchase under the program . the common stock repurchased has been classified as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method . a total of 155924785 and 156878891 shares were held as treasury stock at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . restricted stock units under the company's employee benefit plans are issued from treasury stock . the company has not retired any common stock repurchased since it began the program in july 2010 . 15 . segments and geographic information the segment reporting structure uses the company's organizational structure as its foundation to reflect how the company manages the businesses internally and is organized by geographic regions which provides a socio- political-economic understanding of our business . during the third quarter of 2017 , the europe and asia sbus were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported as part of the eurasia sbu . the management reporting structure is organized by five sbus led by our president and chief executive officer : us , andes , brazil , mcac and eurasia sbus . the company determined that it has five operating and five reportable segments corresponding to its sbus . all prior period results have been retrospectively revised to reflect the new segment reporting structure . in february 2018 , we announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to simplify our portfolio , optimize our cost structure , and reduce our carbon intensity . the company is currently evaluating the impact this reorganization will have on our segment reporting structure . corporate and other 2014 corporate overhead costs which are not directly associated with the operations of our five reportable segments are included in "corporate and other." also included are certain intercompany charges such as self-insurance premiums which are fully eliminated in consolidation . the company uses adjusted ptc as its primary segment performance measure . adjusted ptc , a non-gaap measure , is defined by the company as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to the aes corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to ( a ) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions ; ( b ) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses ; ( c ) gains , losses and associated benefits and costs due to dispositions and acquisitions of business interests , including early plant closures ; ( d ) losses due to impairments ; ( e ) gains , losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt ; and ( f ) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program , including , but not limited to , workforce reduction efforts , relocations , and office consolidation . adjusted ptc also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities . the company has concluded adjusted ptc better reflects the underlying business performance of the company and is the most relevant measure considered in the company's internal evaluation of the financial performance of its segments . additionally , given its large number of businesses and complexity , the company concluded that adjusted ptc is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the company's results . revenue and adjusted ptc are presented before inter-segment eliminations , which includes the effect of intercompany transactions with other segments except for interest , charges for certain management fees , and the write-off of intercompany balances , as applicable . all intra-segment activity has been eliminated within the segment . inter-segment activity has been eliminated within the total consolidated results . the following tables present financial information by segment for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

1	year ended december 31,	total revenue 2017	total revenue 2016	total revenue 2015

2	us sbu	$ 3229	$ 3429	$ 3593

3	andes sbu	2710	2506	2489

4	brazil sbu	542	450	962

5	mcac sbu	2448	2172	2353

6	eurasia sbu	1590	1670	1875

7	corporate and other	35	77	31

8	eliminations	-24 ( 24 )	-23 ( 23 )	-43 ( 43 )

9	total revenue	$ 10530	$ 10281	$ 11260

 .
Conversations:
Question: what percentage was eurasia sbu of the total revenue in 2017?
Answer:

Answer: 0.151


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 on december 8 , 2017 , the board of directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $ 0.13 per share payable on february 15 , 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 1 , 2018 . stock repurchase program 2014 no shares were repurchased in 2017 . the cumulative repurchases from the commencement of the program in july 2010 through december 31 , 2017 totaled 154.3 million shares for a total cost of $ 1.9 billion , at an average price per share of $ 12.12 ( including a nominal amount of commissions ) . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 246 million remained available for repurchase under the program . the common stock repurchased has been classified as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method . a total of 155924785 and 156878891 shares were held as treasury stock at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . restricted stock units under the company's employee benefit plans are issued from treasury stock . the company has not retired any common stock repurchased since it began the program in july 2010 . 15 . segments and geographic information the segment reporting structure uses the company's organizational structure as its foundation to reflect how the company manages the businesses internally and is organized by geographic regions which provides a socio- political-economic understanding of our business . during the third quarter of 2017 , the europe and asia sbus were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported as part of the eurasia sbu . the management reporting structure is organized by five sbus led by our president and chief executive officer : us , andes , brazil , mcac and eurasia sbus . the company determined that it has five operating and five reportable segments corresponding to its sbus . all prior period results have been retrospectively revised to reflect the new segment reporting structure . in february 2018 , we announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to simplify our portfolio , optimize our cost structure , and reduce our carbon intensity . the company is currently evaluating the impact this reorganization will have on our segment reporting structure . corporate and other 2014 corporate overhead costs which are not directly associated with the operations of our five reportable segments are included in "corporate and other." also included are certain intercompany charges such as self-insurance premiums which are fully eliminated in consolidation . the company uses adjusted ptc as its primary segment performance measure . adjusted ptc , a non-gaap measure , is defined by the company as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to the aes corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to ( a ) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions ; ( b ) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses ; ( c ) gains , losses and associated benefits and costs due to dispositions and acquisitions of business interests , including early plant closures ; ( d ) losses due to impairments ; ( e ) gains , losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt ; and ( f ) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program , including , but not limited to , workforce reduction efforts , relocations , and office consolidation . adjusted ptc also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities . the company has concluded adjusted ptc better reflects the underlying business performance of the company and is the most relevant measure considered in the company's internal evaluation of the financial performance of its segments . additionally , given its large number of businesses and complexity , the company concluded that adjusted ptc is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the company's results . revenue and adjusted ptc are presented before inter-segment eliminations , which includes the effect of intercompany transactions with other segments except for interest , charges for certain management fees , and the write-off of intercompany balances , as applicable . all intra-segment activity has been eliminated within the segment . inter-segment activity has been eliminated within the total consolidated results . the following tables present financial information by segment for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

1	year ended december 31,	total revenue 2017	total revenue 2016	total revenue 2015

2	us sbu	$ 3229	$ 3429	$ 3593

3	andes sbu	2710	2506	2489

4	brazil sbu	542	450	962

5	mcac sbu	2448	2172	2353

6	eurasia sbu	1590	1670	1875

7	corporate and other	35	77	31

8	eliminations	-24 ( 24 )	-23 ( 23 )	-43 ( 43 )

9	total revenue	$ 10530	$ 10281	$ 11260

 .
Conversations:
q0: what percentage was eurasia sbu of the total revenue in 2017? {answer0}
Question: at 12/31/17, with an average price per share of $12.12, what would be the cost to repurchase all the remaining shares in the program?
Answer:

Answer: 2981.52


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

1		12/29/2012	12/28/2013	12/27/2014	12/26/2015	12/31/2016	12/30/2017

2	tractor supply company	$ 100.00	$ 174.14	$ 181.29	$ 201.04	$ 179.94	$ 180.52

3	s&p 500	$ 100.00	$ 134.11	$ 155.24	$ 156.43	$ 173.74	$ 211.67

4	s&p retail index	$ 100.00	$ 147.73	$ 164.24	$ 207.15	$ 219.43	$ 286.13

 .
Conversations:
Question: what is the price of tractor supply company in 2013?
Answer:

Answer: 174.14


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

1		12/29/2012	12/28/2013	12/27/2014	12/26/2015	12/31/2016	12/30/2017

2	tractor supply company	$ 100.00	$ 174.14	$ 181.29	$ 201.04	$ 179.94	$ 180.52

3	s&p 500	$ 100.00	$ 134.11	$ 155.24	$ 156.43	$ 173.74	$ 211.67

4	s&p retail index	$ 100.00	$ 147.73	$ 164.24	$ 207.15	$ 219.43	$ 286.13

 .
Conversations:
q0: what is the price of tractor supply company in 2013? {answer0}
Question: what is the price in 2012?
Answer:

Answer: 100.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

1		12/29/2012	12/28/2013	12/27/2014	12/26/2015	12/31/2016	12/30/2017

2	tractor supply company	$ 100.00	$ 174.14	$ 181.29	$ 201.04	$ 179.94	$ 180.52

3	s&p 500	$ 100.00	$ 134.11	$ 155.24	$ 156.43	$ 173.74	$ 211.67

4	s&p retail index	$ 100.00	$ 147.73	$ 164.24	$ 207.15	$ 219.43	$ 286.13

 .
Conversations:
q0: what is the price of tractor supply company in 2013? {answer0}
q1: what is the price in 2012? {answer1}
Question: what is the net change?
Answer:

Answer: 74.14


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

1		12/29/2012	12/28/2013	12/27/2014	12/26/2015	12/31/2016	12/30/2017

2	tractor supply company	$ 100.00	$ 174.14	$ 181.29	$ 201.04	$ 179.94	$ 180.52

3	s&p 500	$ 100.00	$ 134.11	$ 155.24	$ 156.43	$ 173.74	$ 211.67

4	s&p retail index	$ 100.00	$ 147.73	$ 164.24	$ 207.15	$ 219.43	$ 286.13

 .
Conversations:
q0: what is the price of tractor supply company in 2013? {answer0}
q1: what is the price in 2012? {answer1}
q2: what is the net change? {answer2}
Question: what is that change over 100?
Answer:

Answer: 0.7414


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

1	date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials

2	31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0

3	31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6

4	31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2

5	31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9

6	31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9

7	31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

 .
Conversations:
Question: what is the price of citi in 2017?
Answer:

Answer: 193.5


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

1	date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials

2	31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0

3	31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6

4	31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2

5	31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9

6	31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9

7	31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

 .
Conversations:
q0: what is the price of citi in 2017? {answer0}
Question: what is that less 100?
Answer:

Answer: 93.5


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

1	date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials

2	31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0

3	31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6

4	31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2

5	31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9

6	31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9

7	31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

 .
Conversations:
q0: what is the price of citi in 2017? {answer0}
q1: what is that less 100? {answer1}
Question: what is the value of the s&p 500 in 2017?
Answer:

Answer: 208.1


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

1	date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials

2	31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0

3	31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6

4	31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2

5	31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9

6	31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9

7	31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

 .
Conversations:
q0: what is the price of citi in 2017? {answer0}
q1: what is that less 100? {answer1}
q2: what is the value of the s&p 500 in 2017? {answer2}
Question: what is that less 100?
Answer:

Answer: 108.1


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

1	date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials

2	31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0

3	31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6

4	31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2

5	31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9

6	31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9

7	31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

 .
Conversations:
q0: what is the price of citi in 2017? {answer0}
q1: what is that less 100? {answer1}
q2: what is the value of the s&p 500 in 2017? {answer2}
q3: what is that less 100? {answer3}
Question: what is the ratio of the difference of citi to the s&p 500?
Answer:

Answer: 1.15615


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: as of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 . a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 . the company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 . a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 . other state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 . 14 . debt long-term debt consisted of the following: .

1	( $ in millions )	december 31 2017	december 31 2016

2	senior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	2014	600

3	senior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	600	600

4	senior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )	600	2014

5	mississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )	84	84

6	gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )	21	21

7	less unamortized debt issuance costs	-26 ( 26 )	-27 ( 27 )

8	total long-term debt	1279	1278

 credit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the "credit facility" ) with third-party lenders . the credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 . the revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million . the revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( "libor" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) . the revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio . the commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) . the credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio . each of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility . in july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized . the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . senior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below . in november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below . interest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually . the terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers . the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .
Conversations:
Question: what was the change in the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes from 2016 to 2017?
Answer:

Answer: -4.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: as of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 . a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 . the company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 . a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 . other state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 . 14 . debt long-term debt consisted of the following: .

1	( $ in millions )	december 31 2017	december 31 2016

2	senior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	2014	600

3	senior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	600	600

4	senior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )	600	2014

5	mississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )	84	84

6	gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )	21	21

7	less unamortized debt issuance costs	-26 ( 26 )	-27 ( 27 )

8	total long-term debt	1279	1278

 credit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the "credit facility" ) with third-party lenders . the credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 . the revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million . the revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( "libor" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) . the revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio . the commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) . the credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio . each of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility . in july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized . the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . senior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below . in november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below . interest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually . the terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers . the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .
Conversations:
q0: what was the change in the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes from 2016 to 2017? {answer0}
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to those costs in 2016, in percentage?
Answer:

Answer: -0.21053


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the selection and disclosure of our critical accounting estimates have been discussed with our audit committee . the following is a discussion of the more significant assumptions , estimates , accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements : 2022 revenue recognition - we recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists , delivery of product has occurred , the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured . for our company , this means that revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss is transferred to our customers . title transfers to our customers upon shipment or upon receipt at the customer's location as determined by the sales terms for each transaction . the company estimates the cost of sales returns based on historical experience , and these estimates are normally immaterial . 2022 goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review . we perform our annual impairment analysis in the first quarter of each year . while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis . the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value . if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired . to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry . at december 31 , 2015 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.4 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which is comprised of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics . the estimated fair value of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2015 . to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method . we concluded that the fair value of our non-amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value , and any reasonable movement in the assumptions would not result in an impairment . these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs . management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use . since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets . 2022 marketing and advertising costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs which include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions . the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s . gaap . recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program . for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer achieving the specified targets and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made . for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience . changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows . we have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to estimate our marketing programs during the past three years . 2022 employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 . benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) . we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s . gaap . these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates . we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so . as permitted by u.s . gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods . we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries . weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pensions and postretirement plans are as follows: .

1		2015	2014

2	u.s . pension plans	4.30% ( 4.30 % )	3.95% ( 3.95 % )

3	non-u.s . pension plans	1.68% ( 1.68 % )	1.92% ( 1.92 % )

4	postretirement plans	4.45% ( 4.45 % )	4.20% ( 4.20 % )

 we anticipate that assumption changes , coupled with decreased amortization of deferred losses , will decrease 2016 pre-tax u.s . and non- u.s . pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 209 million as compared with approximately $ 240 million in 2015 , excluding .
Conversations:
Question: what is the net change in the non-us pension plans rate from 2014 to 2015?
Answer:

Answer: -0.24


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the selection and disclosure of our critical accounting estimates have been discussed with our audit committee . the following is a discussion of the more significant assumptions , estimates , accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements : 2022 revenue recognition - we recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists , delivery of product has occurred , the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured . for our company , this means that revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss is transferred to our customers . title transfers to our customers upon shipment or upon receipt at the customer's location as determined by the sales terms for each transaction . the company estimates the cost of sales returns based on historical experience , and these estimates are normally immaterial . 2022 goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review . we perform our annual impairment analysis in the first quarter of each year . while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis . the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value . if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired . to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry . at december 31 , 2015 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.4 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which is comprised of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics . the estimated fair value of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2015 . to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method . we concluded that the fair value of our non-amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value , and any reasonable movement in the assumptions would not result in an impairment . these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs . management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use . since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets . 2022 marketing and advertising costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs which include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions . the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s . gaap . recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program . for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer achieving the specified targets and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made . for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience . changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows . we have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to estimate our marketing programs during the past three years . 2022 employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 . benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) . we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s . gaap . these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates . we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so . as permitted by u.s . gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods . we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries . weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pensions and postretirement plans are as follows: .

1		2015	2014

2	u.s . pension plans	4.30% ( 4.30 % )	3.95% ( 3.95 % )

3	non-u.s . pension plans	1.68% ( 1.68 % )	1.92% ( 1.92 % )

4	postretirement plans	4.45% ( 4.45 % )	4.20% ( 4.20 % )

 we anticipate that assumption changes , coupled with decreased amortization of deferred losses , will decrease 2016 pre-tax u.s . and non- u.s . pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 209 million as compared with approximately $ 240 million in 2015 , excluding .
Conversations:
q0: what is the net change in the non-us pension plans rate from 2014 to 2015? {answer0}
Question: what is the rate for 2014?
Answer:

Answer: 1.92


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the selection and disclosure of our critical accounting estimates have been discussed with our audit committee . the following is a discussion of the more significant assumptions , estimates , accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements : 2022 revenue recognition - we recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists , delivery of product has occurred , the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured . for our company , this means that revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss is transferred to our customers . title transfers to our customers upon shipment or upon receipt at the customer's location as determined by the sales terms for each transaction . the company estimates the cost of sales returns based on historical experience , and these estimates are normally immaterial . 2022 goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review . we perform our annual impairment analysis in the first quarter of each year . while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis . the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value . if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired . to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry . at december 31 , 2015 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.4 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which is comprised of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics . the estimated fair value of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2015 . to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method . we concluded that the fair value of our non-amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value , and any reasonable movement in the assumptions would not result in an impairment . these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs . management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use . since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets . 2022 marketing and advertising costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs which include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions . the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s . gaap . recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program . for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer achieving the specified targets and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made . for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience . changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows . we have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to estimate our marketing programs during the past three years . 2022 employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 . benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) . we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s . gaap . these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates . we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so . as permitted by u.s . gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods . we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries . weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pensions and postretirement plans are as follows: .

1		2015	2014

2	u.s . pension plans	4.30% ( 4.30 % )	3.95% ( 3.95 % )

3	non-u.s . pension plans	1.68% ( 1.68 % )	1.92% ( 1.92 % )

4	postretirement plans	4.45% ( 4.45 % )	4.20% ( 4.20 % )

 we anticipate that assumption changes , coupled with decreased amortization of deferred losses , will decrease 2016 pre-tax u.s . and non- u.s . pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 209 million as compared with approximately $ 240 million in 2015 , excluding .
Conversations:
q0: what is the net change in the non-us pension plans rate from 2014 to 2015? {answer0}
q1: what is the rate for 2014? {answer1}
Question: what is the difference over the 2014 rate?
Answer:

Answer: -0.125


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) march 31 , 2004 5 . income taxes ( continued ) the effective tax rate of zero differs from the statutory rate of 34% ( 34 % ) primarily due to the inability of the company to recognize deferred tax assets for its operating losses and tax credits . of the total valuation allowance , approximately $ 2400000 relates to stock option compensation deductions . the tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized . 6 . commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no . 45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no . 5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no . 34 ( fin no . 45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses . these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no . 5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote . the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor . product warranties 2013 the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale . the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards . while the company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of component suppliers , its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates . operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision . patent indemnifications 2013 in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products . the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims . the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions . under the provisions of fin no . 45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only . as of march 31 , 2004 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 . the company has elected not to exercise a buyout option available under its primary lease that would have allowed for early termination in 2005 . total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations , was approximately $ 856000 , $ 823000 and $ 821000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 , 2003 and 2004 , respectively . during the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2000 , the company entered into 36-month operating leases totaling approximately $ 644000 for the lease of office furniture . these leases ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option the furniture was purchased . rental expense recorded for these leases during the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 and 2003 was approximately $ 215000 and $ 127000 respectively . during fiscal 2000 , the company entered into a 36-month capital lease for computer equipment and software for approximately $ 221000 . this lease ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option these assets were purchased . future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2004 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : .

1	year ending march 31,	operating leases

2	2005	$ 781

3	2006	776

4	2007	769

5	2008	772

6	2009	772

7	thereafter	708

8	total future minimum lease payments	$ 4578

 from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types . while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , will not have a material adverse effect on the company. .
Conversations:
Question: what is the last year included in the remaining terms of the facility leases?
Answer:

Answer: 2010.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) march 31 , 2004 5 . income taxes ( continued ) the effective tax rate of zero differs from the statutory rate of 34% ( 34 % ) primarily due to the inability of the company to recognize deferred tax assets for its operating losses and tax credits . of the total valuation allowance , approximately $ 2400000 relates to stock option compensation deductions . the tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized . 6 . commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no . 45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no . 5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no . 34 ( fin no . 45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses . these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no . 5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote . the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor . product warranties 2013 the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale . the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards . while the company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of component suppliers , its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates . operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision . patent indemnifications 2013 in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products . the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims . the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions . under the provisions of fin no . 45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only . as of march 31 , 2004 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 . the company has elected not to exercise a buyout option available under its primary lease that would have allowed for early termination in 2005 . total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations , was approximately $ 856000 , $ 823000 and $ 821000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 , 2003 and 2004 , respectively . during the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2000 , the company entered into 36-month operating leases totaling approximately $ 644000 for the lease of office furniture . these leases ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option the furniture was purchased . rental expense recorded for these leases during the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 and 2003 was approximately $ 215000 and $ 127000 respectively . during fiscal 2000 , the company entered into a 36-month capital lease for computer equipment and software for approximately $ 221000 . this lease ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option these assets were purchased . future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2004 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : .

1	year ending march 31,	operating leases

2	2005	$ 781

3	2006	776

4	2007	769

5	2008	772

6	2009	772

7	thereafter	708

8	total future minimum lease payments	$ 4578

 from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types . while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , will not have a material adverse effect on the company. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the last year included in the remaining terms of the facility leases? {answer0}
Question: and what is the first year?
Answer:

Answer: 2004.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) march 31 , 2004 5 . income taxes ( continued ) the effective tax rate of zero differs from the statutory rate of 34% ( 34 % ) primarily due to the inability of the company to recognize deferred tax assets for its operating losses and tax credits . of the total valuation allowance , approximately $ 2400000 relates to stock option compensation deductions . the tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized . 6 . commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no . 45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no . 5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no . 34 ( fin no . 45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses . these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no . 5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote . the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor . product warranties 2013 the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale . the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards . while the company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of component suppliers , its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates . operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision . patent indemnifications 2013 in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products . the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims . the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions . under the provisions of fin no . 45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only . as of march 31 , 2004 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 . the company has elected not to exercise a buyout option available under its primary lease that would have allowed for early termination in 2005 . total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations , was approximately $ 856000 , $ 823000 and $ 821000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 , 2003 and 2004 , respectively . during the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2000 , the company entered into 36-month operating leases totaling approximately $ 644000 for the lease of office furniture . these leases ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option the furniture was purchased . rental expense recorded for these leases during the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 and 2003 was approximately $ 215000 and $ 127000 respectively . during fiscal 2000 , the company entered into a 36-month capital lease for computer equipment and software for approximately $ 221000 . this lease ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option these assets were purchased . future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2004 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : .

1	year ending march 31,	operating leases

2	2005	$ 781

3	2006	776

4	2007	769

5	2008	772

6	2009	772

7	thereafter	708

8	total future minimum lease payments	$ 4578

 from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types . while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , will not have a material adverse effect on the company. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the last year included in the remaining terms of the facility leases? {answer0}
q1: and what is the first year? {answer1}
Question: how many years, then, are comprehended in this period?
Answer:

Answer: 6.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) march 31 , 2004 5 . income taxes ( continued ) the effective tax rate of zero differs from the statutory rate of 34% ( 34 % ) primarily due to the inability of the company to recognize deferred tax assets for its operating losses and tax credits . of the total valuation allowance , approximately $ 2400000 relates to stock option compensation deductions . the tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized . 6 . commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no . 45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no . 5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no . 34 ( fin no . 45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses . these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no . 5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote . the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor . product warranties 2013 the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale . the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards . while the company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of component suppliers , its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates . operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision . patent indemnifications 2013 in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products . the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims . the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions . under the provisions of fin no . 45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only . as of march 31 , 2004 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 . the company has elected not to exercise a buyout option available under its primary lease that would have allowed for early termination in 2005 . total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations , was approximately $ 856000 , $ 823000 and $ 821000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 , 2003 and 2004 , respectively . during the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2000 , the company entered into 36-month operating leases totaling approximately $ 644000 for the lease of office furniture . these leases ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option the furniture was purchased . rental expense recorded for these leases during the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 and 2003 was approximately $ 215000 and $ 127000 respectively . during fiscal 2000 , the company entered into a 36-month capital lease for computer equipment and software for approximately $ 221000 . this lease ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option these assets were purchased . future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2004 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : .

1	year ending march 31,	operating leases

2	2005	$ 781

3	2006	776

4	2007	769

5	2008	772

6	2009	772

7	thereafter	708

8	total future minimum lease payments	$ 4578

 from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types . while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , will not have a material adverse effect on the company. .
Conversations:
q0: what is the last year included in the remaining terms of the facility leases? {answer0}
q1: and what is the first year? {answer1}
q2: how many years, then, are comprehended in this period? {answer2}
Question: considering that the annual rent of 2003 continues through this period, what would be the total remaining obligation in all of these years?
Answer:

Answer: 4926000.0


Question:
In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 17 . accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .

1	( losses ) earnings ( in millions )	( losses ) earnings 2015	( losses ) earnings 2014	2013

2	currency translation adjustments	$ -6129 ( 6129 )	$ -3929 ( 3929 )	$ -2207 ( 2207 )

3	pension and other benefits	-3332 ( 3332 )	-3020 ( 3020 )	-2046 ( 2046 )

4	derivatives accounted for as hedges	59	123	63

5	total accumulated other comprehensive losses	$ -9402 ( 9402 )	$ -6826 ( 6826 )	$ -4190 ( 4190 )

 reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 . the movement in currency translation adjustments for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was also impacted by the purchase of the remaining shares of the mexican tobacco business . in addition , $ 1 million , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries . for additional information , see note 13 . benefit plans and note 15 . financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments . note 18 . colombian investment and cooperation agreement : on june 19 , 2009 , pmi announced that it had signed an agreement with the republic of colombia , together with the departments of colombia and the capital district of bogota , to promote investment and cooperation with respect to the colombian tobacco market and to fight counterfeit and contraband tobacco products . the investment and cooperation agreement provides $ 200 million in funding to the colombian governments over a 20-year period to address issues of mutual interest , such as combating the illegal cigarette trade , including the threat of counterfeit tobacco products , and increasing the quality and quantity of locally grown tobacco . as a result of the investment and cooperation agreement , pmi recorded a pre-tax charge of $ 135 million in the operating results of the latin america & canada segment during the second quarter of 2009 . at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , pmi had $ 73 million and $ 71 million , respectively , of discounted liabilities associated with the colombian investment and cooperation agreement . these discounted liabilities are primarily reflected in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are expected to be paid through 2028 . note 19 . rbh legal settlement : on july 31 , 2008 , rothmans inc . ( "rothmans" ) announced the finalization of a cad 550 million settlement ( or approximately $ 540 million , based on the prevailing exchange rate at that time ) between itself and rothmans , benson & hedges inc . ( "rbh" ) , on the one hand , and the government of canada and all 10 provinces , on the other hand . the settlement resolved the royal canadian mounted police's investigation relating to products exported from canada by rbh during the 1989-1996 period . rothmans' sole holding was a 60% ( 60 % ) interest in rbh . the remaining 40% ( 40 % ) interest in rbh was owned by pmi. .
Conversations:
Question: what is the net change in the value of total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2013 or 2014?
Answer:

Answer: 2636.0