update chinese version

Original/2026-2-14 original.md

@@ -12,17 +12,12 @@
 
 我还发现了一个在bio里写科幻小说的小哥，把我1415岁改编的那个剧本发过去了。还回了一个喜欢陀思和卡夫卡的小哥，把我初高中时候翻陀思的感悟给翻出来了。
 
-“I have such immense respect and love for Dostoevsky! His depiction of human psychology is incredibly detailed and magnificent; the contradictions, authenticity, and complexity are portrayed vividly. At times, while reading his work, I felt as if I were one of the characters existing within his mind... I can hardly imagine if his soul contained the entire world. I also realized that before reading his books, I had never truly stepped into another person's mind or consciousness... Anyway, he is great and extraordinary... absolutely not just empty praise!! It's my genuine personal experience, sob. Also... perhaps due to a resonance in psychological complexity, I inevitably like Raskolnikov. I sympathize with him.
-
-It's complicated... specifically, it's not simple pity... I feel he sinned because his intellect was mismatched with the society and era he lived in. Let's put it this way: his brooding was indeed excessive, but that was also a product of his times. Intellect itself is innocent, yet due to the degradation of social morality and the dislocation between the era and the individual... it became a crime. What I sympathize with isn't his crime, but the "human" who was coerced by circumstance, committed the act, and ultimately suffered the chaos of a tormented conscience.
-
-Some of his moral codes weren't exactly wrong... In a society where morality has collapsed, whether an individual has the capacity to correct it is a difficult question for the conscience. I think that while Dostoevsky used Raskolnikov to express that individuals cannot bear such consequences, just as the humanity he depicted is complex, his attitude toward Rodya is likely complex as well. Perhaps... he actually held compassion for him too.
-
-His intellect overrode morality, which is the root contradiction of his being. Thought must match the era it inhabits, otherwise conflict is inevitable. He thought too deeply, and his society couldn't contain him. Thus, he was doomed to be faulted.
-
-But I think... what he did was wrong, yet his motives, his purpose, and his contemplation of social ethics make me sympathize with and like him. I imagine that if such a person lived in our era, if his life encountered people who could exchange ideas and alter his perspectives... I would see it as a tragedy... even though rationally, I know it was more "real" given that social background.
-
-I also want to share a critique of Dostoevsky by Tolstoy that I read before. It's fascinating, and perhaps you've seen it: “Obviously, Dostoevsky, with the spirit of Michelangelo, sculpted these 'people with flayed skin' to warm your gaze. You should hang this anatomical masterpiece, this piece of bloody flesh, high above your desk to fully share in its contemplation... but I would rather keep my distance. People with such experience see how the skin ripples, how the blood flows in streams, and most terrifyingly, they see in these eyes, these 'mirrors of the soul,' that the thoughts of those dissected by the author refract their own.”
+“我特别敬佩喜欢陀思妥耶夫斯基！他写人的心理写得太细致太了不起了，矛盾性真实性复杂性淋漓尽致。以至于我曾在读他的某部作品中感觉自己仿佛也是存在于他笔下他心灵中的某个人物。...我难以想象他心灵中是不是包含了世界上所有的人。还意识到在读他的书之前我从未真正踏入过他人的心灵和意识世界...哎，总之伟大而了不起...绝对不是空泛的溢美之词啊啊!!是我亲身的体会呜呜。还有...或许因为心理复杂度上的共性，我不可避免地很喜欢拉斯柯尔尼科夫。很同情。哎。
+这很复杂...哎，具体来说我也不是简单的同情.....我觉得他是因思想和思想所处的社会与时代不匹配而犯罪。嗯这样说，他的思虑确实过重，但那也是时代所导致的。而思想本身无罪，却因为社会道德的沦丧，社会时代与个人的隔膜脱节...而成为罪行。我同情的并不是他的罪行，我同情的是那个被迫被推动，而犯下这样罪行，到最后被迫混乱而蒙受良心之苦的那个“人”。
+有一些他的道德准则确实并没有错。...在社会出现道德败坏沦丧的情况下，个体究竟有无能力修正，这实在是个于良心很困难的问题。我想陀思虽然借拉斯柯尔尼科夫表达了个体并无能力承担此后果，但正如他笔下所还原所描写的人性是复杂的，我想他对罗佳的态度也是复杂的，或许...其实对他本身也是怀有悲悯的吧。
+他的思想凌驾于道德，这也是他，这个人本身的根源矛盾。思想和思想所处的社会时代必须匹配，否则必将产生冲突。他想得太深，所处的时代社会却无法容纳他。所以，他必然获咎
+但我想…他所做的事��错的，但他的动机目的，他对时代社会伦理的思考都让我同情而喜爱他。我会想象这样的人假使生活在我们这样的时代，假使他的生活里再出现其他能改变他的观念，和他交流的人……我会觉得这是一个悲剧。…虽然理智来说，我知道它在那个社会背景下是更真实的。
+我还想分享一下我之前看到的，托尔斯泰对陀思的评价，这非常有意思，也许你读到过：显然，陀思妥耶夫斯基以米开朗基罗的精神塑造的“有这皮开肉绽的皮肤的人”温暖了你的凝视。你应当将这一解剖学的杰作、这一块血淋淋的肉体高悬于你的书桌之上，以充分分享其沉思默想……但是我更愿意对它敬而远之。 富有这种经验的人，他们看到了皮肤如何泛起波痕，血液如何流成小溪，最为恐怖的是，他们看到，在这些眼睛里，这些“灵魂之镜”中，那些被作者所切割的人的思想折射出了他们自己。”
 
 但是目前还没有人给我回信，无聊哦。