[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-05T19:50:08.402086", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 72.1."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 74.2; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.09."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 304 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-05T19:50:08.396867", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 72.1.", "Trend score is 74.2; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.09.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 304 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 270.53.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 70.6 and thesis conviction 71.9/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Momentum score is 72.1. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 270.53.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.

Trend score is 74.2; price structure is supportive.

Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.09.

News flow is active with 304 linked 7D records.

Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-05T20:51:00.196906", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 72.1."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 74.2; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.09."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 304 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-05T20:51:00.191219", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 72.1.", "Trend score is 74.2; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.09.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 304 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 270.53.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 70.6 and thesis conviction 71.9/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Momentum score is 72.1. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 270.53.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-05T21:30:52.792945", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 72.1."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 74.2; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.09."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 304 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-05T21:30:52.785576", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 72.1.", "Trend score is 74.2; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.09.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 304 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 270.53.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 70.6 and thesis conviction 71.9/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Momentum score is 72.1. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 270.53.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-05T22:11:44.102938", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 72.1."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 74.2; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.09."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 304 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-05T22:11:44.094994", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 72.1.", "Trend score is 74.2; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.09.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 304 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 270.53.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 70.6 and thesis conviction 71.9/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Momentum score is 72.1. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 270.53.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-05T22:53:01.988107", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 72.1."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 74.2; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.09."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 304 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-05T22:53:01.969430", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 72.1.", "Trend score is 74.2; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.09.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 304 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 270.53.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 70.6 and thesis conviction 71.9/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Momentum score is 72.1. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 270.53.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 306 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-05T23:52:56.723440", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 72.1."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 74.2; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.09."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 306 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-05T23:52:56.717304", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 72.1.", "Trend score is 74.2; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.09.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 306 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 270.53.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 70.6 and thesis conviction 71.9/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Momentum score is 72.1. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 270.53.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.

The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.

Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.

Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.

News flow is active with 194 linked 7D records.

Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T00:33:43.286208", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 194 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T00:33:43.276078", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 194 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.0 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T01:13:52.507665", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 194 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T01:13:52.497390", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 194 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.0 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T01:55:04.624450", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 194 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T01:55:04.608923", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 194 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.0 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T02:55:41.353227", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 194 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T02:55:41.336162", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 194 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.0 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T03:36:53.191634", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 194 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T03:36:53.183289", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 194 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.0 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T04:17:44.212293", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 194 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T04:17:44.198954", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 194 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.0 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 195 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T04:57:58.101384", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 195 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T04:57:58.093080", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 195 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.0 and thesis conviction 71.6/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T05:39:41.903797", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 195 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T05:39:41.890497", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 195 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.0 and thesis conviction 71.6/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 197 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T07:00:29.559742", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 197 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T07:00:29.551438", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 197 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T07:40:58.012768", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 197 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T07:40:58.003467", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 197 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T08:21:18.843286", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 197 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T08:21:18.797312", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 197 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T09:02:20.750648", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 197 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T09:02:20.745438", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 197 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 198 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T09:42:27.295361", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 198 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T09:42:27.286973", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 198 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20.

News flow is active with 193 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T10:21:22.160083", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 193 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T10:21:22.144815", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 193 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 177 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T11:28:05.684461", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 177 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T11:28:05.672892", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 177 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T12:07:58.209560", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 177 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T12:07:58.193742", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 177 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T12:48:58.977020", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 177 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T12:48:58.970262", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 177 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 176 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T13:30:15.402788", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 176 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T13:30:15.380163", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 176 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21.

News flow is active with 179 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T14:10:24.478816", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 179 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T14:10:24.459816", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 179 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.2 and thesis conviction 71.8/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 182 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T14:52:02.539702", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 182 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T14:52:02.523177", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 182 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 183 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T15:32:06.418508", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 183 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T15:32:06.397784", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 183 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T16:12:21.313031", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 182 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T16:12:21.297257", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 182 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T16:52:38.099272", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 182 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T16:52:38.074042", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 182 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 180 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T17:53:57.339043", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 180 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T17:53:57.317372", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 180 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.1 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 170 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T18:34:45.001839", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 170 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T18:34:44.981165", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 170 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.0 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.

Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.18.

News flow is active with 168 linked 7D records.

Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-06T19:16:04.168634", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 75.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.18."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 168 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-06T19:16:04.161187", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 75.0.", "Trend score is 90.3; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.18.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 168 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Watch research setup with Blum score 71.0 and thesis conviction 71.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: The market may be discounting risks that the positive narrative has not absorbed. Primary support: Momentum score is 75.0. Main challenge: Price is weakening while recent sentiment is positive.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 395.70.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}