[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T12:02:06.458405", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 152 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T12:02:06.414431", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05.", "News flow is active with 152 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.7 and thesis conviction 59.9/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.

Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05.

News flow is active with 154 linked 7D records.

Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T12:43:50.714361", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 154 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T12:43:50.701732", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05.", "News flow is active with 154 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.7 and thesis conviction 59.9/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.07.

News flow is active with 153 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T13:23:56.427400", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.07."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 153 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T13:23:56.401003", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.07.", "News flow is active with 153 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.9 and thesis conviction 60.0/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.07. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 155 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T14:04:22.279791", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.07."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 155 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T14:04:22.256424", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.07.", "News flow is active with 155 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.9 and thesis conviction 60.1/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.07. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T14:45:54.476974", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.07."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 154 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T14:45:54.442004", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.07.", "News flow is active with 154 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.9 and thesis conviction 60.1/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.07. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.06.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T15:26:49.163448", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.06."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 154 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T15:26:49.135922", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.06.", "News flow is active with 154 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.8 and thesis conviction 60.0/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.06. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T16:06:49.504952", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 154 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T16:06:49.489002", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05.", "News flow is active with 154 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.7 and thesis conviction 59.9/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T16:47:50.037961", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 154 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T16:47:50.021656", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 154 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.7 and thesis conviction 59.9/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.

News flow is active with 156 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T17:48:33.774361", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 156 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T17:48:33.760222", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 156 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.5 and thesis conviction 59.8/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 158 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T18:28:36.453413", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 158 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T18:28:36.441760", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 158 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.6 and thesis conviction 59.8/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T19:11:06.149401", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 158 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T19:11:06.126421", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 158 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.6 and thesis conviction 59.8/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.02.

News flow is active with 160 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T19:51:05.179790", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.02."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 160 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T19:51:05.166600", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.02.", "News flow is active with 160 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.5 and thesis conviction 59.7/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.02. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 162 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T20:53:18.814450", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 162 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T20:53:18.804608", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 162 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.6 and thesis conviction 59.8/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 161 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T21:32:50.227716", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 161 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T21:32:50.218788", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 161 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.6 and thesis conviction 59.8/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T22:14:55.425179", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 162 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T22:14:55.404398", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 162 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.5 and thesis conviction 59.7/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T22:54:58.399800", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.02."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 162 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T22:54:58.363367", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.02.", "News flow is active with 162 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.5 and thesis conviction 59.7/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.02. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 163 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-30T23:35:57.711232", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 163 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-30T23:35:57.695053", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 163 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 55.5 and thesis conviction 59.8/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 267.16.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 177 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T14:56:57.146525", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 177 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T14:56:57.131879", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 177 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 58.2 and thesis conviction 60.5/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.

The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.

Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive.

Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30.

News flow is active with 112 linked 7D records.

Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T14:56:57.351240", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 100.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 112 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T14:56:57.341851", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 100.0.", "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 112 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 77.1 and thesis conviction 74.7/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Sentiment/news and price are mutually reinforcing, but direct causality remains probabilistic. Primary support: Momentum score is 100.0. Main challenge: RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 178 linked 7D records.

Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T15:17:27.590561", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 178 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T15:17:27.583395", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 178 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 58.2 and thesis conviction 60.6/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T15:17:27.782775", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 100.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 112 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T15:17:27.774628", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 100.0.", "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 112 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 77.1 and thesis conviction 74.7/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Sentiment/news and price are mutually reinforcing, but direct causality remains probabilistic. Primary support: Momentum score is 100.0. Main challenge: RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 179 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T15:37:59.711085", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 179 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T15:37:59.689888", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 179 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 58.2 and thesis conviction 60.6/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T15:38:00.002589", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 100.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 112 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T15:37:59.989866", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 100.0.", "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 112 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 77.1 and thesis conviction 74.7/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Sentiment/news and price are mutually reinforcing, but direct causality remains probabilistic. Primary support: Momentum score is 100.0. Main challenge: RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T15:58:31.622741", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 179 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T15:58:31.613781", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 179 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 58.2 and thesis conviction 60.6/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T15:58:31.837471", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 100.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 112 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T15:58:31.831780", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 100.0.", "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 112 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 77.1 and thesis conviction 74.7/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Sentiment/news and price are mutually reinforcing, but direct causality remains probabilistic. Primary support: Momentum score is 100.0. Main challenge: RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T16:18:34.967850", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 179 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T16:18:34.959952", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 179 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 58.2 and thesis conviction 60.6/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 113 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T16:18:35.159994", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 100.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 113 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T16:18:35.152850", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 100.0.", "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 113 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 77.0 and thesis conviction 74.7/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Sentiment/news and price are mutually reinforcing, but direct causality remains probabilistic. Primary support: Momentum score is 100.0. Main challenge: RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.

News flow is active with 183 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T16:59:18.800556", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 183 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T16:59:18.786281", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 183 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 58.2 and thesis conviction 60.6/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T16:59:19.063945", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 100.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 113 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T16:59:19.051752", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 100.0.", "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 113 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 77.0 and thesis conviction 74.7/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Sentiment/news and price are mutually reinforcing, but direct causality remains probabilistic. Primary support: Momentum score is 100.0. Main challenge: RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T17:19:33.704007", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 183 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T17:19:33.697602", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 183 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 58.2 and thesis conviction 60.6/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T17:19:33.880300", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 100.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 113 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T17:19:33.873898", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 100.0.", "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 113 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 77.0 and thesis conviction 74.7/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Sentiment/news and price are mutually reinforcing, but direct causality remains probabilistic. Primary support: Momentum score is 100.0. Main challenge: RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T17:40:21.538166", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 183 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T17:40:21.522796", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 183 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 58.2 and thesis conviction 60.6/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T17:40:21.812700", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 100.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 113 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T17:40:21.803223", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 100.0.", "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 113 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 77.0 and thesis conviction 74.7/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Sentiment/news and price are mutually reinforcing, but direct causality remains probabilistic. Primary support: Momentum score is 100.0. Main challenge: RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 184 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T18:00:36.152849", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 184 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T18:00:36.135363", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 184 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 58.2 and thesis conviction 60.6/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 269.20.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 114 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-07-01T18:00:36.502731", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 100.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 114 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-07-01T18:00:36.478303", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 100.0.", "Trend score is 95.7; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.30.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 114 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 77.0 and thesis conviction 74.7/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Sentiment/news and price are mutually reinforcing, but direct causality remains probabilistic. Primary support: Momentum score is 100.0. Main challenge: RSI is elevated, increasing the risk of crowded short-term momentum.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 394.43.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}