Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.

News flow is active with 141 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T13:23:46.588327", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 141 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T13:23:46.569600", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 141 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.

Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.

Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.15.

News flow is active with 60 linked 7D records.

Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T13:23:46.848386", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.15."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 60 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T13:23:46.833856", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.15.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 60 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.5 and thesis conviction 75.2/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.

Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05.

Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T13:44:16.077134", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 141 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T13:44:16.069653", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05.", "News flow is active with 141 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.4 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.05. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.16.

News flow is active with 56 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T13:44:16.222523", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.16."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 56 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T13:44:16.216518", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.16.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 56 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.5 and thesis conviction 75.3/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 140 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T14:04:02.008998", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 140 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T14:04:01.993316", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 140 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.4 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T14:04:02.225814", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.16."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 56 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T14:04:02.219952", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.16.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 56 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.5 and thesis conviction 75.3/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 137 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T14:24:20.889868", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 137 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T14:24:20.884224", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 137 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.17.

News flow is active with 57 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T14:24:21.043394", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.17."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 57 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T14:24:21.036485", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.17.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 57 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.7 and thesis conviction 75.4/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T14:44:37.996872", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 137 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T14:44:37.991852", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 137 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.

News flow is active with 58 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T14:44:38.139848", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 58 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T14:44:38.134868", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 58 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.7 and thesis conviction 75.5/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T15:05:20.972096", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 137 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T15:05:20.966052", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 137 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T15:05:21.129428", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 60 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T15:05:21.123668", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 60 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.8 and thesis conviction 75.5/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 138 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T15:25:48.683772", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 138 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T15:25:48.679307", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 138 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T15:25:48.815675", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 60 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T15:25:48.811012", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.19.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 60 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.8 and thesis conviction 75.5/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T15:46:15.347865", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 137 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T15:46:15.343033", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 137 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20.

News flow is active with 61 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T15:46:15.495492", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 61 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T15:46:15.488568", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 61 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.9 and thesis conviction 75.6/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.

News flow is active with 144 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T16:26:59.402076", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 144 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T16:26:59.396665", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 144 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.1/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.

Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T16:26:59.539300", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 61 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T16:26:59.534549", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 61 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.9 and thesis conviction 75.6/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 146 linked 7D records.

Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T16:47:41.987681", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 146 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T16:47:41.960544", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 146 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.1/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T16:47:42.250482", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 61 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T16:47:42.236298", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.20.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 61 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.9 and thesis conviction 75.6/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 148 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T17:07:17.053212", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 148 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T17:07:17.032384", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 148 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.1/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21.

News flow is active with 63 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T17:07:17.308599", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 63 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T17:07:17.293750", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 63 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.9 and thesis conviction 75.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 147 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T17:27:56.714623", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 147 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T17:27:56.710754", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03.", "News flow is active with 147 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.1/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.03. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 62 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T17:27:57.820314", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 62 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T17:27:57.813827", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 62 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 79.0 and thesis conviction 75.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 149 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T17:47:35.390671", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 149 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T17:47:35.386939", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 149 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 64 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T17:47:35.521990", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 64 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T17:47:35.516724", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 64 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.9 and thesis conviction 75.6/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 150 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T18:07:45.903238", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 150 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T18:07:45.897403", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 150 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 70 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T18:07:46.053093", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 70 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T18:07:46.045216", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 70 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 79.0 and thesis conviction 75.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.

News flow is active with 152 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T18:28:21.835074", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 152 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T18:28:21.831439", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 152 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


News flow is active with 74 linked 7D records.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T18:28:21.965458", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 74 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T18:28:21.959916", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 74 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.9 and thesis conviction 75.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T18:48:16.255921", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 152 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T18:48:16.244736", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 152 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.22.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T18:48:16.436023", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.22."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 74 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T18:48:16.429861", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.22.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 74 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 79.0 and thesis conviction 75.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T19:28:50.461787", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 152 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T19:28:50.457550", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 152 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.4 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.

News flow is active with 77 linked 7D records.

Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T19:28:50.587446", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Momentum score is 90.0."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 77 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Panic", "risk_sentiment": "High Risk", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "Breakout signal is discounted because the regime is defensive.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T19:28:50.583053", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AMAT"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk."], "bull_case": ["Momentum score is 90.0.", "Trend score is 91.6; price structure is supportive.", "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.21.", "Price is above both SMA20 and SMA50.", "News flow is active with 77 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.0."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AMAT (Applied Materials Inc.) is a Technical Breakout research setup with Blum score 78.9 and thesis conviction 75.7/100 in a Panic regime. The working explanation is: Narrative activity is visible but has not yet translated into a decisive price move. Primary support: Momentum score is 90.0. Main challenge: The latest signal is explicitly marked High risk.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 393.26.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Volatility expands further without a compensating increase in evidence quality.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}


Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7.

[System] You are BLUM Finance, an evidence-bound financial reasoning model. Use only supplied point-in-time evidence and abstain when it is insufficient.

[User] {"as_of": "2026-06-29T20:30:15.031954", "evidence": [{"type": "supporting", "value": "Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "News flow is active with 150 linked 7D records."}, {"type": "supporting", "value": "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."}, {"type": "contradicting", "value": "No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."}, {"type": "risk", "value": "Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."}], "horizon": "swing", "market_context": {"macro_environment": {}, "market_breadth": {}, "market_regime": "Risk-Off", "risk_sentiment": "Defensive", "sector_performance": {"relative_strength": 0.0}, "signal_regime_adjustment": "No material regime adjustment beyond standard confirmation checks.", "timestamp": "2026-06-29T20:30:15.023802", "volatility_regime": "high_volatility"}, "portfolio_context": {}, "question": "Evaluate the evidence and state what would change the view.", "ticker": "AAPL"}

[Assistant] {"bear_case": ["No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof."], "bull_case": ["Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04.", "News flow is active with 150 linked 7D records.", "Fundamental evidence is supportive with score 76.7."], "confidence": 100.0, "invalidation_conditions": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."], "risks": ["Risk evidence is incomplete and requires verification."], "status": "watch", "thesis": "AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a Neutral research setup with Blum score 60.3 and thesis conviction 60.2/100 in a Risk-Off regime. The working explanation is: Current evidence does not isolate a dominant cause. Primary support: Sentiment confirms part of the thesis with 7D sentiment 0.04. Main challenge: No major contradiction is visible from the current stored evidence, but absence of contradiction is not proof.", "what_would_change_the_view": ["Loss of support near 266.33.", "Sentiment turns negative while price momentum fades.", "ETF or sector confirmation fails to appear after the next market refresh.", "Positive narrative becomes crowded but no longer improves price structure."]}