# PRD: databricks-cost-leak-hunter **Author:** Jeremy Longshore (Intent Solutions) **Date:** 2026-07-07 **Status:** Active > Backfilled 2026-07-07 from the shipped skill (SKILL.md v0.1.0, `eval-spec.yaml`, and the > pack's design-review record) to the `templates/skill-docs/` submission standard — the > first first-party skill held to the pack/flagship tier of the doc matrix. Refs #984. ## Problem Databricks bills climb without an explanation a finance owner can act on. The waste hides in four recurring configurations: clusters that never auto-terminate and bill around the clock for idle compute; scheduled jobs running on All-Purpose Compute (~$0.55/DBU) instead of Jobs Compute (~$0.15/DBU) — 2–3× the cost for identical work; clusters sized for peak that idle below 25% CPU; and the ~2× Photon DBU premium paid on jobs it doesn't accelerate. The native billing data can prove all four, but it lives in `system.*` tables behind a metastore-admin grant chain and speaks in DBUs — so cost reviews either stall on access, or arrive as engineering jargon a CFO can't act on, or fall back to generic industry waste estimates that a skeptical reader can dismiss. ## Target users | User | Context | Primary need | | -------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | CFO / FinOps owner | Monthly spend review, or the Databricks bill just spiked | A dollar-ranked report readable in ~90 seconds and actionable without an engineer to translate | | Data-platform engineer | Asked "why is our Databricks bill so high?" and needs defensible numbers, not vibes | Deterministic detection SQL over `system.billing.usage` plus a ranked list of one-config-change fixes | | Databricks workspace admin | Recurring cost-hygiene sweeps (idle clusters, wrong-SKU jobs, oversized floors, Photon usage) | A repeatable detect → compute → rank → report pipeline with confirmed-vs-estimated labeling | ## Success criteria Criteria 1–3 are enforced verbatim by the skill's `eval-spec.yaml` judge criteria. 1. Triggers on Databricks cost questions ("why is my databricks bill", "find wasted spend", "cost leak") and does not trigger on unrelated prompts — eval criterion `triggers-on-cost-question` (blocker) plus the two should-not-trigger control cases. 2. A CFO with no Databricks engineering knowledge can read the output in ~90 seconds and say "we are wasting $X here, fix it" without an engineer — eval criterion `produces-cfo-grokkable-report` (blocker). 3. Confirmed and estimated/at-risk dollars are never summed under one figure, and every leak carries a Confidence label (Confirmed / Estimated / At-risk) — eval criterion `splits-confirmed-vs-estimated` (regression-critical), with confirmed figures attributed to `system.billing.usage` (`dollars-from-billing-not-estimates`). 4. A workspace missing the billing grant chain is reported upfront with the exact missing `GRANT` statements — Step 1 fails fast instead of dying mid-analysis (eval criterion `checks-grant-chain-upfront`). ## Functional requirements - **FR-1:** Verify the metastore-admin grant chain on `system.billing` before any analysis; on failure, report the exact missing grants verbatim and stop. - **FR-2:** Detect the four named leak categories with SQL over `system.billing.usage` joined to `system.billing.list_prices` via the CLI Statement Execution API: idle clusters (`auto_termination_minutes = 0`), scheduled jobs on `ALL_PURPOSE`, overprovisioned clusters (<25% CPU from `system.compute.node_timeline`), and the Photon premium (`sku_name ILIKE '%PHOTON%'`). - **FR-3:** Corroborate each leak's live configuration through `databricks-workspace-mcp` (`clusters_get`, `clusters_events`, `clusters_list`, `instance_pools_list`, `pipelines_get`); if the MCP server is absent, still produce the dollar figures and accept pasted config instead of failing. - **FR-4:** Do all dollar arithmetic in the deterministic ranker (`scripts/rank-and-report.py`) — the LLM never eyeballs a number; every leak carries a `kind` of `confirmed` / `estimated` / `at-risk`. - **FR-5:** Render the CFO report per `references/cfo-output-format.md`: a split headline that never sums confirmed and unconfirmed dollars under one verb, a trailing-30-day window stamp, a ranked table with a Confidence column, and a #1-line annualized callout — each fix a single config change. ## Out of scope - Authoring cost-control policy (cluster policies, spot configs) — that is the sibling `databricks-cost-tuning` skill; this skill detects and reports. - Applying any fix — every remediation is a recommendation for a human-approved config change; the skill never mutates workspace configuration. - Estimating spend when the billing tables are unreadable — no grant chain, no report (fail fast at Step 1 rather than substitute guesses). - Standard-tier / non-Unity-Catalog workspaces — the `system.*` tables are UC-governed and unavailable there.