Jainamshahhh commited on
Commit
f169807
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): c756601

Upload common/scoring.py with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. common/scoring.py +201 -0
common/scoring.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ """Scoring harness shared by every entry's scorer.
2
+
3
+ Reads the generation files gcp_eval.py writes and handles the two modes uniformly:
4
+
5
+ {"id","category","prompt","reference","tuned","base"} adapter run
6
+ {"id","category","prompt","reference","output"} Day-0 base-only run
7
+
8
+ Conventions carried over from the three scorers that won the finished entries:
9
+
10
+ - A per-row metric returns True, False, or **None meaning not applicable**, and None is
11
+ excluded from that metric's denominator rather than counted wrong.
12
+ - A metric that is a strict conjunction gets no partial credit, because partial credit
13
+ hides the failure that matters: a confidently wrong answer that looks well-formed.
14
+ - If nothing was scoreable, say so loudly. A silent 0.0% reads like a model result when
15
+ it is really a harness failure, and that has cost this project real time.
16
+ - Print the DELTA in both points and relative percent, because the competition scores
17
+ relative improvement over the base.
18
+ """
19
+ from __future__ import annotations
20
+
21
+ import json
22
+ from pathlib import Path
23
+ from typing import Callable, Sequence
24
+
25
+ LABELS = {"tuned": "TUNED", "base": "BASE", "output": "BASE (day-0)"}
26
+
27
+
28
+ def load(path: str | Path) -> list[dict]:
29
+ rows = [json.loads(l) for l in Path(path).read_text().splitlines() if l.strip()]
30
+ if not rows:
31
+ raise SystemExit(f"{path}: no rows")
32
+ return rows
33
+
34
+
35
+ def columns(rows: Sequence[dict]) -> list[str]:
36
+ """Which prediction columns this file carries."""
37
+ return ["tuned", "base"] if "tuned" in rows[0] else ["output"]
38
+
39
+
40
+ def score_file(rows: Sequence[dict],
41
+ metrics: dict[str, Callable[[str, dict], bool | None]]) -> dict:
42
+ """Apply each metric to each row for each column.
43
+
44
+ metrics maps a metric name to fn(prediction_text, row) -> True | False | None.
45
+ Returns {column: {metric: {"pct","n_true","n_scored","n_skipped"}}}.
46
+ """
47
+ out: dict[str, dict] = {}
48
+ for col in columns(rows):
49
+ per: dict[str, dict] = {}
50
+ for name, fn in metrics.items():
51
+ t = s = k = 0
52
+ for r in rows:
53
+ v = fn(r.get(col) or "", r)
54
+ if v is None:
55
+ k += 1
56
+ continue
57
+ s += 1
58
+ t += bool(v)
59
+ per[name] = {"pct": round(100.0 * t / s, 1) if s else 0.0,
60
+ "n_true": t, "n_scored": s, "n_skipped": k}
61
+ out[col] = per
62
+ return out
63
+
64
+
65
+ def report(result: dict, title: str, headline: str | None = None) -> None:
66
+ """Print the metric table, the harness warning, and the DELTA block."""
67
+ cols = list(result)
68
+ names = list(next(iter(result.values()))) if result else []
69
+
70
+ print("=" * 72)
71
+ print(title)
72
+ print("=" * 72)
73
+ w = max([len(n) for n in names] + [22])
74
+ print(f"{'metric':<{w}} " + " ".join(f"{LABELS.get(c, c):>14}" for c in cols))
75
+ for n in names:
76
+ cells = []
77
+ for c in cols:
78
+ m = result[c][n]
79
+ cells.append(f"{m['pct']:>8.1f}% ({m['n_true']}/{m['n_scored']})".rjust(14))
80
+ print(f"{n:<{w}} " + " ".join(cells))
81
+
82
+ for c in cols:
83
+ for n in names:
84
+ if result[c][n]["n_scored"] == 0:
85
+ print(f"\nWARNING: 0 of the rows were scoreable for {n!r} on column {c!r}.")
86
+ print(" This is a HARNESS failure, not a model result. Check that the")
87
+ print(" generation file matches the slice and that ids/references parse.")
88
+
89
+ if headline and len(cols) == 2 and headline in names:
90
+ b = result["base"][headline]["pct"]
91
+ t = result["tuned"][headline]["pct"]
92
+ rel = f"{(t - b) / b * 100:+.0f}%" if b else "n/a (base is 0)"
93
+ print(f"\nDELTA {headline}: {b:.1f}% to {t:.1f}% "
94
+ f"= {t - b:+.1f} points, relative {rel}")
95
+
96
+
97
+ def length_report(rows: Sequence[dict]) -> dict:
98
+ """Median output length per column, and the terseness ratio.
99
+
100
+ First-class on purpose. Collapsing to terse output raised accuracy and destroyed the
101
+ win rate twice in this project, and both times it was invisible in the accuracy
102
+ numbers.
103
+
104
+ THE DENOMINATOR IS GOLD, NOT BASE, and that correction was bought with a false
105
+ positive. On MolPerceive the tuned median was 406 characters against a base of 1,609,
106
+ a ratio of 0.25 that tripped the old rule and failed a run that was fine. The gold
107
+ median was also 406: the tuned model matched the target format exactly, and the base
108
+ was long only because it rambles through chemistry it gets wrong. Measuring terseness
109
+ against a verbose, incorrect base inverts the rule precisely when the base is worst.
110
+
111
+ So the gate is `tuned / gold`, which is what "did the model get terser than it should
112
+ be" actually means. The base ratio is still reported, as context only, because a large
113
+ gap between the two is informative about the base rather than about us.
114
+
115
+ A guard that cries wolf is worse than no guard, because it trains you to skip it.
116
+ """
117
+ def med(xs: list[int]) -> int:
118
+ return sorted(xs)[len(xs) // 2] if xs else 0
119
+
120
+ cols = columns(rows)
121
+ out = {c: med([len(r.get(c) or "") for r in rows]) for c in cols}
122
+
123
+ # The reference column is the gold completion; scorers name it "reference".
124
+ gold = med([len(r.get("reference") or "") for r in rows])
125
+ if gold:
126
+ out["gold"] = gold
127
+ if "tuned" in out and "base" in out and out["base"]:
128
+ out["ratio_tuned_over_base"] = round(out["tuned"] / out["base"], 2)
129
+ if "tuned" in out and gold:
130
+ ratio = out["tuned"] / gold
131
+ out["ratio_tuned_over_gold"] = round(ratio, 2)
132
+ out["terseness_flag"] = ratio < 0.6
133
+ out["terseness_basis"] = "gold"
134
+ elif "tuned" in out and "base" in out and out["base"]:
135
+ # No gold available (Day-0 probe files carry no reference). Fall back to base and
136
+ # SAY SO, so a flag raised on the weaker basis is never mistaken for the real gate.
137
+ out["terseness_flag"] = out["ratio_tuned_over_base"] < 0.6
138
+ out["terseness_basis"] = "base (no gold column present, weaker signal)"
139
+ return out
140
+
141
+
142
+ def _selftest() -> None:
143
+ rows = [
144
+ {"id": "1", "prompt": "p", "reference": "42", "tuned": "42", "base": "41"},
145
+ {"id": "2", "prompt": "p", "reference": "7", "tuned": "7", "base": "7"},
146
+ {"id": "3", "prompt": "p", "reference": "9", "tuned": "9", "base": ""},
147
+ ]
148
+ exact = lambda pred, row: pred.strip() == row["reference"]
149
+ res = score_file(rows, {"exact": exact})
150
+ assert res["tuned"]["exact"]["pct"] == 100.0, res
151
+ assert res["base"]["exact"]["pct"] == 33.3, res
152
+ ok = 2
153
+
154
+ # None must leave the denominator, not count as wrong.
155
+ half = lambda pred, row: None if row["id"] == "3" else pred.strip() == row["reference"]
156
+ res2 = score_file(rows, {"h": half})
157
+ assert res2["tuned"]["h"]["n_scored"] == 2 and res2["tuned"]["h"]["n_skipped"] == 1
158
+ assert res2["tuned"]["h"]["pct"] == 100.0
159
+ ok += 2
160
+
161
+ # The terseness gate, PROVEN able to both pass and fail on its new basis. It is
162
+ # measured against gold, and the case that motivated the change is the first one: a
163
+ # verbose wrong base must not fail a tuned model that matches the target format.
164
+ verbose_base = [
165
+ {"id": "1", "prompt": "p", "reference": "x" * 400, "tuned": "y" * 400,
166
+ "base": "z" * 1600},
167
+ ]
168
+ lr = length_report(verbose_base)
169
+ assert lr["terseness_flag"] is False, lr # 1.00x gold, despite 0.25x base
170
+ assert lr["ratio_tuned_over_gold"] == 1.0, lr
171
+ assert lr["ratio_tuned_over_base"] == 0.25, lr # still reported, as context
172
+ assert lr["terseness_basis"] == "gold", lr
173
+ ok += 1
174
+
175
+ # And it MUST fire when the tuned model really did collapse against gold.
176
+ collapsed = [
177
+ {"id": "1", "prompt": "p", "reference": "x" * 400, "tuned": "y" * 100,
178
+ "base": "z" * 400},
179
+ ]
180
+ lr2 = length_report(collapsed)
181
+ assert lr2["terseness_flag"] is True, lr2 # 0.25x gold
182
+ ok += 1
183
+
184
+ # Day-0 single-column files.
185
+ d0 = [{"id": "1", "prompt": "p", "reference": "42", "output": "42"}]
186
+ assert columns(d0) == ["output"]
187
+ assert score_file(d0, {"exact": exact})["output"]["exact"]["pct"] == 100.0
188
+ ok += 2
189
+
190
+ # Terseness canary fires when tuned collapses.
191
+ terse = [{"id": "1", "prompt": "p", "reference": "", "tuned": "x", "base": "x" * 100}]
192
+ assert length_report(terse)["terseness_flag"] is True
193
+ fine = [{"id": "1", "prompt": "p", "reference": "", "tuned": "x" * 90, "base": "x" * 100}]
194
+ assert length_report(fine)["terseness_flag"] is False
195
+ ok += 2
196
+
197
+ print(f"scoring selftest: {ok} assertions OK")
198
+
199
+
200
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
201
+ _selftest()