{"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_1", "prompt": "Between the two funds, E Fund S&P Biotechnology Index (QDII-LOF) A and Southern CSI 300 Connect A, on 2024-05-23, which fund had a positive return over the past week and a return of more than 4% over the past 3 months?", "reference_response": "On 2024-05-23, E Fund S&P Biotechnology Index (QDII-LOF) A had a return of -3.366649% over the past week and a return of -5.649718% over the past 3 months; Southern CSI 300 Connect A had a return of 0.087484% over the past week and a return of 4.352075% over the past 3 months. Only Southern CSI 300 Connect A meets the conditions of having a positive return over the past week and a return of more than 4% over the past 3 months.", "response_final_reference": "Southern CSI 300 Connect A", "judge_prompt_template": "：{prompt}：{response_reference}：{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_10", "prompt": "As of September 11, 2025, among the three funds E Fund Global Allocation Mixed (QDII) A (RMB), ChinaAMC Juhui FOFA, and GF SZSE 100 Index C, which fund has a return of more than 20% over the past 3 months and more than 15% over the past 1 month?", "reference_response": "According to data as of September 11, 2025:\n- E Fund Global Allocation Mixed (QDII) A (RMB): the return rate over the past 3 months was 18.06%, and the return rate over the past 1 month was 7.44%;\n- China AMC Juhui FOFA: the return rate over the past 3 months was 4.17%, and the return rate over the past 1 month was 1.96%;\n- GF SZSE 100 Index C: the return rate over the past 3 months was 26.16%, and the return rate over the past 1 month was 16.23%.\nOnly GF SZSE 100 Index C meets both conditions of a return rate exceeding 20% over the past 3 months and a return rate exceeding 15% over the past 1 month.", "response_final_reference": "GF Shenzhen 100 Index C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_11", "prompt": "Among the three companies S Jiatong, Qiaofeng Intelligent, and Dongfang Precision, which two ranked in the top two for net cash flow from operating activities in the first quarter of 2024?", "reference_response": "In the first quarter of 2024, the net cash flow from operating activities was RMB 5,507,844.28 for Dongfang Precision, -9,972,220.4 for Qiaofeng Intelligent, and -45,909,873.19 for S Jiatong. Based on the quantile comparison (the smaller the quantile, the higher the rank): Dongfang Precision's quantile is 0 (highest), Qiaofeng Intelligent's quantile is 0.5, and S Jiatong's quantile is 1 (lowest). Therefore, the top two companies in terms of net cash flow from operating activities are Dongfang Precision and Qiaofeng Intelligent.", "response_final_reference": "Dongfang Precision and Qiaofeng Intelligence", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_12", "prompt": "In the cumulative financial reports for the third quarter of 2024, which company, Jishi Media or Allwinner Technology, had a net cash flow from operating activities greater than RMB 40 million and a net cash flow from investing activities higher than -RMB 200 million?", "reference_response": "According to the cumulative financial report data for the third quarter of 2024:\n- Jishi Media's net cash flow from operating activities was 123 million yuan (greater than 40 million yuan), and the net cash flow generated by investing activities was -284 million yuan (lower than -200 million yuan);\n- Allwinner Technology's net cash flow from operating activities was 47.6286 million yuan (greater than 40 million yuan), and the net cash flow generated by investing activities was -185 million yuan (higher than -200 million yuan).\nOnly Allwinner Technology simultaneously meets the conditions that net cash flow from operating activities is greater than 40 million yuan and the net cash flow generated by investing activities is higher than -200 million yuan.", "response_final_reference": "Allwinner Technology", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_13", "prompt": "On what date did Shanying International first release its financial report in 2025, as of 2025-12-08?", "reference_response": "As of 2025-12-08 in 2025, the first financial report released by Shanying International was on April 30, 2025, and it was the Q1 2025 report.", "response_final_reference": "April 30, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_14", "prompt": "For the four days 2025-12-01, 2025-12-02, 2025-12-03, and 2025-12-04, for Index Type - Equity Index Enhanced and Index Type - Equity, which two days had the highest average values for the metric average weekly return rate among the same category?", "reference_response": "2025-12-01 (Index Type - Enhanced Equity Index 0.0329% / Index Type - Equity 0.0285%), 2025-12-02 (Index Type - Enhanced Equity Index 0.0148% / Index Type - Equity 0.0117%), 2025-12-03 (Index Type - Enhanced Equity Index 0.0051% / Index Type - Equity -0.0001%), 2025-12-04 (Index Type - Enhanced Equity Index 0.0072% / Index Type - Equity 0.0056%); calculated based on the mean of the average one-week returns of the peer groups for the two categories: 2025-12-01 (0.0307%) > 2025-12-02 (0.01325%) > 2025-12-04 (0.0064%) > 2025-12-03 (0.0025%), therefore the two highest days are 2025-12-01 and 2025-12-02.", "response_final_reference": "2025-12-01 and 2025-12-02", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_15", "prompt": "For the two Chinese funds GF Antai Steady Pension One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) Y and Ping An CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF Initiated Link A, which fund had a smaller return ranking percentile at the end of 2024?", "reference_response": "At the end of 2024, Ping An CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF Initiated Link A had a return ranking of 534, with 2,974 comparable funds, giving a percentile of approximately 0.1796; GF Antai Steady Pension One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) Y had a return ranking of 613, with 1,810 comparable funds, giving a percentile of approximately 0.3387. A smaller percentile indicates a higher ranking, so Ping An CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF Initiated Link A has a smaller percentile and ranks higher.", "response_final_reference": "The percentile of Ping An CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF Feeder A is smaller", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_16", "prompt": "What was the unit net value of the China Merchants Consumer 80 ETF Feeder Fund on September 30, 2025?", "reference_response": "The unit NAV of the China Merchants CSI Consumer 80 ETF Feeder Fund on September 30, 2025 was 2.2525 yuan. Scoring requirement: accurate to two decimal places", "response_final_reference": "2.2525 yuan. Scoring requirement: accurate to two decimal places", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_17", "prompt": "When was ICBC Credit Suisse SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Linked Fund A established?", "reference_response": "ICBC Credit Suisse SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Feeder A was established on March 5, 2021.", "response_final_reference": "March 5, 2021", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_18", "prompt": "On 2025-06-16, between the two funds China Merchants Shengxin Preferred 3-Month Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A and HuaBao CSI 500 Index Enhanced C, which fund had a better return over the past 1 month?", "reference_response": "Data as of June 16, 2025 shows: the return of China Merchants Shengxin Preferred 3-Month Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A over the past 1 month was 1.3728%, and the return of HuaBao CSI 500 Index Enhanced C over the past 1 month was 3.2850%. Comparing by percentile ranking (the higher the value, the better the ranking), HuaBao CSI 500 Index Enhanced C performed better.", "response_final_reference": "Huabao CSI 500 Index Enhanced C performed better", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_19", "prompt": "In the quarterly financial reports corresponding to the two dates 2025-06-05 and 2025-10-14 for Shunna Co., Ltd., when did earnings per share first exceed RMB 0.10?", "reference_response": "In the semiannual report corresponding to 2025-06-05, earnings per share were RMB 0.06; in the cumulative Q3 quarterly report corresponding to 2025-10-14, earnings per share were RMB 0.12. RMB 0.10 is an important round-number threshold (1 jiao), so the first time Shunna Co., Ltd.'s earnings per share exceeded RMB 0.10 was in the reporting period corresponding to 2025-10-14.", "response_final_reference": "2025-10-14", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_2", "prompt": "When was the Fullgoal CSI Value ETF Link C established?", "reference_response": "Fullgoal CSI Value ETF Link C was established on April 2, 2019.", "response_final_reference": "April 2, 2019", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_20", "prompt": "Among the two funds, Guotai Minxiang Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF) and Penghua Anhe Hybrid C, which fund had the higher return over the past 6 months on 2024-08-05?", "reference_response": "As of 2024-08-05, the 6-month return of Guotai Minxiang Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF) was 3.018868%, and the 6-month return of Penghua Anhe Hybrid C was 2.941176%. Therefore, Guotai Minxiang Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF) had the highest return over the past 6 months.", "response_final_reference": "Guotai Minxiang Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF)", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_21", "prompt": "Among the three companies Jinhaitong, Yuexiu Expressway A, and Shanying International, which company had the highest monetary funds in the corresponding cumulative Q3 quarterly report on October 29, 2025?", "reference_response": "The cumulative Q3 quarterly report corresponding to October 29, 2025 shows: Jinhaitong's monetary funds were 406 million yuan, Yuexiu Expressway A's monetary funds were 5.459 billion yuan, and Shanying International's monetary funds were 4.147 billion yuan. Therefore, Yuexiu Expressway A had the highest monetary funds.", "response_final_reference": "Yue Expressway A", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_22", "prompt": "Among the three companies Ganfeng Lithium, Bank of Zhengzhou, and Zhongji Innolight, during the Q1 2024 financial reporting season (corresponding to the financial reporting quarter of 2024-03-20), which company had net cash flow from operating activities exceeding 500 million yuan and net cash flow from investing activities greater than -700 million yuan?", "reference_response": "According to the Q1 2024 financial report data (statistical cutoff date: 2024-03-31, unit: RMB yuan):\n- Ganfeng Lithium: net cash flow from operating activities was 118,855,695.01 yuan (about 119 million yuan), and net cash flow from investing activities was -2,079,431,243.89 yuan (about -2.079 billion yuan). The net cash flow from operating activities of 119 million yuan was below 500 million yuan, and the net cash flow from investing activities of -2.079 billion yuan was below -700 million yuan, so it does not meet the conditions.\n- Bank of Zhengzhou: net cash flow from operating activities was -102,343,000 yuan (about -0.10 billion yuan), and net cash flow from investing activities was -3,534,432,000 yuan (about -3.534 billion yuan). The net cash flow from operating activities of -0.10 billion yuan was below 500 million yuan, and the net cash flow from investing activities of -3.534 billion yuan was below -700 million yuan, so it does not meet the conditions.\n- Zhongji Innolight: net cash flow from operating activities was 650,503,647.23 yuan (about 651 million yuan), and net cash flow from investing activities was -665,851,810.74 yuan (about -666 million yuan). The net cash flow from operating activities of 651 million yuan exceeded 500 million yuan, and the net cash flow from investing activities of -666 million yuan was higher than -700 million yuan (because -6.66 > -7).\nTherefore, only Zhongji Innolight meets the condition that net cash flow from operating activities exceeds 500 million yuan and net cash flow from investing activities is higher than -700 million yuan.", "response_final_reference": "Zhongji Xuchuang", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_23", "prompt": "Among the four companies Yuwell Medical, Vanke A, TEDA Co., Ltd., and Mengguli, which company, in the corresponding Q1 single-quarter report on February 3, 2025, had monetary funds exceeding 500 million yuan and total current liabilities below 10 billion yuan?", "reference_response": "In the Q1 single-quarter report corresponding to February 3, 2025, Yuyue Medical had monetary funds of 708 million yuan and total current liabilities of 2.901 billion yuan; Vanke A had monetary funds of 75.502 billion yuan and total current liabilities of 677.710 billion yuan; TEDA Co., Ltd. had monetary funds of 3.533 billion yuan and total current liabilities of 25.135 billion yuan; Mongoli had monetary funds of 290 million yuan and total current liabilities of 1.290 billion yuan. Only Yuyue Medical meets the conditions of monetary funds exceeding 500 million yuan (708 million yuan) and total current liabilities being below 10 billion yuan (2.901 billion yuan).", "response_final_reference": "Yuwell Medical", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_24", "prompt": "On what date was Yihua Co., Ltd.'s 2025 semiannual report released?", "reference_response": "Yihua Co., Ltd.'s 2025 semiannual report release date is August 29, 2025", "response_final_reference": "August 29, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_25", "prompt": "On what date was Avary Holding's single-quarter report for the third quarter of 2025 released?", "reference_response": "Pengding Holdings' report for the single third quarter of 2025 was released on October 31, 2025.", "response_final_reference": "October 31, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_26", "prompt": "Among the three funds Southern CSI 500 ETF Feeder C, Pengyang CSI Digital Economy Theme ETF Feeder A, and CEIBS Yingxuan Steady 6-Month Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A, which two funds had the highest return rates (%) over the past 1 month as of March 14, 2025?", "reference_response": "As of March 14, 2025, the return of Southern CSI 500 ETF Feeder C over the past 1 month was 2.343266971683%, the return of Pengyang CSI Digital Economy Theme ETF Feeder A over the past 1 month was 2.32374950768%, and the return of CEIBS Yingxuan Steady 6-Month Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A over the past 1 month was -0.00970779536%; by percentile comparison, the top two were Southern CSI 500 ETF Feeder C (highest) and Pengyang CSI Digital Economy Theme ETF Feeder A.", "response_final_reference": "Southern CSI 500 ETF Feeder C and Pengyang CSI Digital Economy Theme ETF Feeder A", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_27", "prompt": "Among the four funds—China Merchants Heyue Balanced Pension Three-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), ChinaAMC CSI Subdivided Nonferrous Metals Industry Theme ETF Initiated Link A, ChinaAMC CSI Subdivided Nonferrous Metals Industry Theme ETF Initiated Link C, and Changxin S&P 100 Equal Weight Index (QDII) USD Share—which fund's return ranking percentile in 2024 was between 30% and 35%?", "reference_response": "In 2024, China Merchants Heye Balanced Pension Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) had a return ranking of 164 out of 481 funds in its category, with a percentile of approximately 34.1%; ChinaAMC CSI Subdivided Nonferrous Metals Industry Thematic ETF Initiated Linkage A had a return ranking of 1882 out of 2974 funds in its category, with a percentile of approximately 63.3%; ChinaAMC CSI Subdivided Nonferrous Metals Industry Thematic ETF Initiated Linkage C had a return ranking of 1895 out of 2974 funds in its category, with a percentile of approximately 63.7%; and Changxin S&P 100 Equal Weight Index (QDII) USD Share had a return ranking of 235 out of 394 funds in its category, with a percentile of approximately 59.6%. Only China Merchants Heye Balanced Pension Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) has a percentile (34.1%) between 30% and 35%.", "response_final_reference": "China Merchants HeYue Balanced Pension Three-Year Holding Period Mixed (FOF)", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_28", "prompt": "When was Tongda Co., Ltd. listed?", "reference_response": "Tongda Co., Ltd. was listed on the A-share market on March 3, 2011", "response_final_reference": "March 3, 2011", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_29", "prompt": "For XinYuan Xinxuan Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Partial-Debt Hybrid (FOF) A, on which of these two dates, 2024-11-05 and 2025-05-27, did the average six-month return of its corresponding fund category exceed 0.02% and the average one-year return of the same category exceed 0.04%?", "reference_response": "2024-11-05: The peer-category average six-month return was 0.0279%, exceeding 0.02%; the peer-category average one-year return was 0.0422%, exceeding 0.04%. 2025-05-27: The peer-category average six-month return was 0.0200%, equal to 0.02% and not exceeding 0.02%; the peer-category average one-year return was 0.0377%, not exceeding 0.04%. Therefore, only 2024-11-05 meets the condition that the peer-category average six-month return exceeds 0.02% and the peer-category average one-year return exceeds 0.04%.", "response_final_reference": "2024-11-05", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_3", "prompt": "On 2024-08-22, among the three funds Zhongou Foresight Pension 2035 (FOF) A, Bank of Communications Huixuan Ruixin One-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A, and Industrial CSI 300 ETF Initiated Linkage C, which two funds had the best returns over the past 3 months?", "reference_response": "On 2024-08-22, the nearly 3-month return of Zhong Ou Vision Pension 2035 (FOF) A was -9.254299%, Bank of Communications Huixuan Ruixin One-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A was -8.375894%, and Industrial CSI 300 ETF Initiated Connection C was -7.715441%. The top two best performers were Industrial CSI 300 ETF Initiated Connection C and Bank of Communications Huixuan Ruixin One-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A.", "response_final_reference": "Industrial Bank CSI 300 ETF Feeder Initiated C, Bank of Communications Huiluan Ruixin One-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_30", "prompt": "Among the five funds Huatai-PineBridge CSI 2000 Index Enhanced C, Southern Guozheng Transportation Industry ETF Feeder A, CSC Financial Ruixuan 6-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A, China Merchants Hehui Target Date 2045 Five-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A, and Southern Xiaokang Industry ETF Feeder C, which two funds had the highest returns over the past 3 months on 2024-12-03?", "reference_response": "On 2024-12-03, Huatai-PineBridge CSI 2000 Index Enhanced C had a return of 45.534214% over the past 3 months, China Southern CNI Transportation Industry ETF Initiated Linked A had a return of 13.638554% over the past 3 months, CSC Ruixuan 6-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A had a return of 9.220702% over the past 3 months, China Merchants Hehui Target Date 2045 Five-Year Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A had a return of 9.008062% over the past 3 months, and China Southern Xiaokang Industry ETF Linked C had a return of 18.780075% over the past 3 months; sorting the 3-month return values of all funds in descending order gives: 45.534214% (ranked 1), 18.780075% (ranked 2), 13.638554% (ranked 3), 9.220702% (ranked 4), 9.008062% (ranked 5). Based on the overall percentile comparison (percentile calculation formula: percentile = (rank - 1) / (total number - 1), where a smaller percentile indicates a higher ranking), Huatai-PineBridge CSI 2000 Index Enhanced C has a percentile of 0.0 (ranked 1st), China Southern Xiaokang Industry ETF Linked C has a percentile of 0.25 (ranked 2nd), China Southern CNI Transportation Industry ETF Initiated Linked A has a percentile of 0.5 (ranked 3rd), CSC Ruixuan 6-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A has a percentile of 0.75 (ranked 4th), and China Merchants Hehui Target Date 2045 Five-Year Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A has a percentile of 1.0 (ranked 5th). Therefore, the top two are Huatai-PineBridge CSI 2000 Index Enhanced C and China Southern Xiaokang Industry ETF Linked C.", "response_final_reference": "Huatai-PineBridge CSI 2000 Index Enhanced C and Southern Xiaokang Industry ETF Feeder C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_31", "prompt": "What was the nearly 1-year return rate of Penghua Fenghe Bond (LOF) Class A on 2024-12-13?", "reference_response": "According to the tool retrieval results, Penghua Fenghe Bond (LOF) Class A (code: 160621.OF) had a past 1-year return of 1.020999% on 2024-12-13. This data is based on information updated at 2025-12-10 12:23:26, and also includes other relevant indicators: the unit NAV was 1.3951 yuan, the accumulated unit NAV was 1.7371 yuan, the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV was -0.17%, the past 1-week return was 0.309175%, the past 1-month return was 0.19391%, the past 3-month return was 2.122831%, the past 6-month return was 1.56523%, the past 2-year return was 1.683673%, the past 3-year return was -7.792465%, the past 5-year return was 13.146796%, the past 10-year return was 57.271367%, the return since the beginning of this year was 1.020999%, and the return since inception was 87.371942%.", "response_final_reference": "1.020999%", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_32", "prompt": "When was Yinhua Zunyi Steady Pension One-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) Y established?", "reference_response": "Yinhua Zunyi Steady Pension One-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) Y was established on November 16, 2022.", "response_final_reference": "November 16, 2022", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_33", "prompt": "When was Nanjing Port listed?", "reference_response": "Nanjing Port was listed on the A-share market on March 25, 2005.", "response_final_reference": "March 25, 2005", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_34", "prompt": "On what date was Haixin Energy Technology's Q2 2025 financial report released?", "reference_response": "Haixin Energy Technology's Q2 2025 financial report was released on August 29, 2025", "response_final_reference": "August 29, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_35", "prompt": "What was the average three-month return of comparable funds for Everbright Pramerica Sunshine Three-Month Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) C on 2024-10-11?", "reference_response": "According to the data updated on 2025-12-10, the average three-month return rate for the same category of Everbright PGIM Sunshine Three-Month Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) C on 2024-10-11 was 0.0541%.", "response_final_reference": "0.0541%", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_36", "prompt": "For the two funds, Guotai Minze Balanced Pension Target Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) and Southern Fuyuan Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) A, in 2023, which fund had a smaller return ranking percentile among funds in the same category (i.e., performed better)?", "reference_response": "In 2023, the return ranking of Guotai Minze Balanced Pension Target Three-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) among peer funds was 73, with a total of 471 peer funds participating in the ranking, giving it a percentile of 73/471≈0.155; the return ranking of Nanfang Fuyuan Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A among peer funds was 1627, with a total of 1806 peer funds participating in the ranking, giving it a percentile of 1627/1806≈0.901. A smaller percentile indicates a higher ranking, so Guotai Minze Balanced Pension Target Three-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) had the smaller percentile and performed better.", "response_final_reference": "The quantile of Guotai Minze Balanced Pension Target Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) is smaller, indicating better performance.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_37", "prompt": "On what date was Simei Media's Q1 2023 financial report released?", "reference_response": "Simei Media's Q1 2023 financial report was released on April 30, 2024.", "response_final_reference": "April 30, 2024", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_38", "prompt": "When was Jiyuan Group listed?", "reference_response": "Jiyuan Group was listed on the A-share market on July 23, 2025.", "response_final_reference": "July 23, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_39", "prompt": "When was China Merchants Progressive Strategy Preferred 3-Month Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF) C established?", "reference_response": "China Merchants Aggressive Strategy Select 3-Month Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF) C was established on September 19, 2024", "response_final_reference": "September 19, 2024", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_4", "prompt": "Among the four funds Ping An CSI Hong Kong Healthcare ETF Link E, Harvest CSI STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C, Huabao CSI All Share Agriculture, Forestry, Animal Husbandry and Fishery Index Initiated C, and ChinaAMC Fuze Pension Target 2035 Three-Year Holding Mixed Initiated (FOF), which fund, as of October 15, 2025, had a return of more than 10% over the past 3 months and a positive return over the past 1 month?", "reference_response": "As of October 15, 2025, Ping An CSI Hong Kong Stocks Healthcare ETF Link E had a return rate of 9.40% over the past 3 months and -7.85% over the past 1 month; Harvest CSI STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return rate of 46.32% over the past 3 months and 0.80% over the past 1 month; HuaBao CSI All Share Agriculture, Forestry, Animal Husbandry & Fishery Index Initiated C had a return rate of 8.16% over the past 3 months and -4.35% over the past 1 month; ChinaAMC Fuze Pension Target 2035 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) had a return rate of 7.08% over the past 3 months and 2.67% over the past 1 month. Only Harvest CSI STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C simultaneously meets the conditions of having a return rate of more than 10% over the past 3 months and a positive return rate over the past 1 month.", "response_final_reference": "Harvest CSI STAR 50 and ChiNext 50 Index C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_40", "prompt": "For the two funds, Southern Xiaokang Industry ETF Link A and E Fund CSI Wind M&A and Restructuring Index (LOF), as of the end of Q3 2024, which fund had a return ranking percentile below 40% and an actual gain/loss exceeding the peer-group average return?", "reference_response": "As of the end of Q3 2024: Southern Xiaokang Industry ETF Link A had a return ranking of 2140 (out of 2647 funds in the same category, percentile 80.85%), with an actual gain/loss of 0.116%, lower than the category average return of 0.1723%; E Fund CSI Wind M&A Restructuring Index (LOF) had a return ranking of 1017 (percentile 38.42%), with an actual gain/loss of 0.1836%, exceeding the category average return of 0.1723%. Only E Fund CSI Wind M&A Restructuring Index (LOF) meets the conditions of having a return ranking percentile below 40% and an actual gain/loss exceeding the category average return.", "response_final_reference": "E Fund CSI Wind Mergers and Acquisitions Restructuring Index (LOF)", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_41", "prompt": "On what date did Yalian Development last release its financial report in 2025? (as of 2025-12-10)", "reference_response": "Yalian Development's last financial report release in 2025 was on October 28, 2025, and it released the 2025 third-quarter report (cumulative quarterly report).", "response_final_reference": "October 28, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_42", "prompt": "Between HiSun Technology and China Southern Airlines Company Limited, on August 5, 2024, which company's trading volume exceeded 13 million shares and had a turnover rate below 0.5%?", "reference_response": "On August 5, 2024, Teamsun had a trading volume of 12,513,800 shares, with a turnover rate of 1.14%; China Southern Airlines Company Limited had a trading volume of 13,828,326 shares, with a turnover rate of 0.30%. Only China Southern Airlines Company Limited meets the conditions of trading volume exceeding 13 million shares (actual: 13,828,326 shares) and turnover rate below 0.5% (actual: 0.30%).", "response_final_reference": "China Southern Airlines Company Limited", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_43", "prompt": "On which of the two dates, 2024-03-21 and 2025-09-10, did the peer-category average three-month return of the fund category to which Southern Bank Feeder C belongs exceed 0.1% and the peer-category average one-year return exceed 0.5%?", "reference_response": "On 2025-09-10, the average three-month return of its peer fund category was 0.1945% (exceeding 0.1%), and the average one-year return of its peer category was 0.5528% (exceeding 0.5%); whereas on 2024-03-21, the average three-month return of its peer category was 0.0315% (not exceeding 0.1%), and the average one-year return of its peer category was -0.1106% (not exceeding 0.5%). Therefore, only 2025-09-10 meets the conditions.", "response_final_reference": "2025-09-10", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_44", "prompt": "On 2024-01-04, what was the return rate over the past 1 month for ChinaAMC CSI Bank ETF Link C?", "reference_response": "On 2024-01-04, the return rate of ChinaAMC CSI Bank ETF Link C over the past 1 month was -0.150588%. Scoring requirement: accurate to -0.15%", "response_final_reference": "-0.150588% Scoring requirement: accurate to -0.15%", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_45", "prompt": "Among Guoshou Ampao Target Date 2030 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF), ChinaAMC CSI Semiconductor Chip ETF Feeder C, and ChinaAMC Consumer Electronics ETF Feeder C, based on the average percentile of their annual return rankings in the two years 2023 and 2024, which two funds are the top two respectively?", "reference_response": "The annual return rankings and average percentile calculations for each fund are as follows:\n- China Life AMP Target Date 2030 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF):\n 2023 ranking: 290/471 (percentile: 290/471≈0.616),\n 2024 ranking: 166/481 (percentile: 166/481≈0.345),\n Average percentile: (0.616+0.345)/2=0.480\n\n- ChinaAMC CSI Semiconductor Chip ETF Feeder C:\n 2023 ranking: 970/2226 (percentile: 970/2226≈0.436),\n 2024 ranking: 251/2974 (percentile: 251/2974≈0.084),\n Average percentile: (0.436+0.084)/2=0.260\n\n- ChinaAMC Consumer Electronics ETF Feeder C:\n 2023 ranking: 252/2226 (percentile: 252/2226≈0.113),\n 2024 ranking: 1180/2974 (percentile: 1180/2974≈0.397),\n Average percentile: (0.113+0.397)/2=0.255\n\nSorted by average percentile from smallest to largest (the smaller the percentile, the better the performance):\n1. ChinaAMC Consumer Electronics ETF Feeder C (0.255)\n2. ChinaAMC CSI Semiconductor Chip ETF Feeder C (0.260)\nThe top two funds are ChinaAMC Consumer Electronics ETF Feeder C and ChinaAMC CSI Semiconductor Chip ETF Feeder C.", "response_final_reference": "ChinaAMC Consumer Electronics ETF Feeder C and ChinaAMC CSI Semiconductor Chip ETF Feeder C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_46", "prompt": "The query time is 2025-08-11 10:11:00. What was Chow Tai Fook gold's price on 2024-10-01 in yuan per gram, and what was Zijin Mining (601899.SH)'s closing price on 2024-09-30 in yuan? How many times was Zijin Mining's stock price relative to Chow Tai Fook gold's price? Keep 2 decimal places.", "reference_response": "According to the query results:\n\n1. The price of Chow Tai Fook gold on 2024-10-01 was: 768.00 yuan/gram\n2. Zijin Mining (601899.SH) had a closing price of: 17.64 yuan on 2024-09-30\n3. Zijin Mining's stock price was: 0.02 times the price of Chow Tai Fook gold (17.64÷768.00=0.02)", "response_final_reference": "0.02x", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_47", "prompt": "The question was asked on April 23, 2025 at 17:39:00. During the second quarter of 2024 (April 1 to June 30), among BYD (002594.SZ), LONGi Green Energy (601012.SH), Ping An Insurance of China (601318.SH), Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (601398.SH), Vanke A (000002.SZ), and SMIC (688981.SH), which company had the highest cumulative trading value? What was the specific trading amount, in 100 million yuan?", "reference_response": "During the second quarter of 2024 (April 1 to June 30), among these 6 companies, BYD (002594.SZ) had the highest cumulative trading value, specifically RMB 176.130 billion.\n\nThe ranking of each company's cumulative trading value is as follows:\n1. BYD: RMB 176.130 billion\n2. Vanke A: RMB 143.107 billion\n3. Ping An of China: RMB 135.499 billion\n4. LONGi Green Energy: RMB 105.088 billion\n5. Industrial and Commercial Bank of China: RMB 87.724 billion\n6. SMIC: RMB 67.927 billion", "response_final_reference": "176.13 billion yuan", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_48", "prompt": "The question was asked on April 15, 2025 at 15:33:00. On the day when the Eurozone CPI was most recently released, what were the daily percentage change of London gold and the federal funds rate?", "reference_response": "According to the query results, the most recent release date of the Eurozone CPI was March 19, 2025. On that date:\n- London gold daily change: 0.61% (USD-denominated)\n- Federal funds rate: 4.33%", "response_final_reference": "4.33%", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_49", "prompt": "Between ST Hongda and Laimei Pharmaceutical, which company had a higher net cash flow from operating activities in the 2024 semiannual report?", "reference_response": "In the 2024 semiannual report, ST Hongda (stock code: 002211.SZ) had net cash flow from operating activities of -4,514,181.12 yuan, while LaiMei Pharmaceutical (stock code: 300006.SZ) had net cash flow from operating activities of 122,810,162.08 yuan. Therefore, LaiMei Pharmaceutical had the higher net cash flow from operating activities.", "response_final_reference": "RMB 122,810,162.08", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_5", "prompt": "What were the respective release dates of all China's GDP data in 2023?", "reference_response": "The release dates for all 2023 GDP data were April 18, 2023 (first quarter), July 17, 2023 (second quarter), October 18, 2023 (third quarter), and January 17, 2024 (fourth quarter).", "response_final_reference": "April 18, 2023 (first quarter), July 17, 2023 (second quarter), October 18, 2023 (third quarter), and January 17, 2024 (fourth quarter)", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_50", "prompt": "Among the five companies Nanjing Panda, Weaver Network, SG Micro, Halo Microelectronics, and Swancor New Material, which company had the lowest net inflow of main funds on 2024-03-13?", "reference_response": "On 2024-03-13, Nanjing Panda's net inflow of main funds was -39,369,721.53 yuan, Weaver Network's net inflow of main funds was 3,270,145.82 yuan, SG Micro's net inflow of main funds was -5,188,115.85 yuan, Halo Microelectronics' net inflow of main funds was -19,596,378.17 yuan, and Swancor Advanced Materials' net inflow of main funds was 0.00 yuan. Nanjing Panda had the lowest net inflow of main funds.", "response_final_reference": "Nanjing Panda", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_6", "prompt": "For the two funds Ping An SSE Dividend Low Volatility Index A and Invesco Great Wall Pension 2035 Three-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), as of 2024-07-29, which fund had the lower return over the past 3 months?", "reference_response": "Data as of 2024-07-29 show: Ping An SSE Dividend Low Volatility Index A had a return rate of -2.0% over the past 3 months, while Invesco Great Wall Pension 2035 Three-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) had a return rate of -5.038979% over the past 3 months; Invesco Great Wall Pension 2035 Three-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) had the lowest return rate over the past 3 months.", "response_final_reference": "Invesco Great Wall Pension 2035 Three-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF)", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_7", "prompt": "Among the five stocks Laobaigan Liquor, Chuanyi Technology, Shanghai Electric Machinery, HTO Securities, and Hongxin Technology, which stock had a trading volume exceeding 50 million shares and a turnover rate below 4% on August 29, 2025?", "reference_response": "On August 29, 2025, Lao Baigan Liquor had a trading volume of 48.9432 million shares, with a turnover rate of 5.38%; Chuanyi Technology had a trading volume of 8.6021 million shares, with a turnover rate of 4.75%; Shanghai Mechanical & Electrical had a trading volume of 33.6013 million shares, with a turnover rate of 4.17%; HTOU Co., Ltd. had a trading volume of 64.8971 million shares, with a turnover rate of 3.12%; Hongxin Technology had a trading volume of 2.0587 million shares, with a turnover rate of 2.74%. Only HTOU Co., Ltd. meets the condition of having a trading volume exceeding 50 million shares and a turnover rate below 4%.", "response_final_reference": "Hatou Co., Ltd.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_8", "prompt": "Among the four funds Southern CSI New Energy ETF Feeder C, China Merchants CSI Semiconductor Industry ETF Initiated Feeder C, GF ChiNext ETF Initiated Feeder E, and China Universal Tianfu Ruixuan Stable Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF), which two funds had the highest return over the past week on 2024-08-06?", "reference_response": "On 2024-08-06, the past one-week returns of the four funds were: Southern CSI New Energy ETF Linked C at 0.823045%, China Merchants CSI Semiconductor Industry ETF Initiated Linked C at -2.164465%, GF ChiNext ETF Initiated Linked E at -0.21144%, and China Universal Tianfu Ruixuan Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) at -0.474183%. Comparing by quantile (the higher the return, the higher the ranking), the top two are Southern CSI New Energy ETF Linked C (highest quantile) and GF ChiNext ETF Initiated Linked E (second-highest quantile).", "response_final_reference": "Southern CSI New Energy ETF Feeder C and GF ChiNext ETF Initiated Feeder E", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_1hop_9", "prompt": "Among the three funds Huabao CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Internet ETF Initiated Link C, Guotai Communication Equipment A, and Southern Fuyuan Steady One-Year Pension A, which fund had a return rate of over 10% in the past 1 month and over 20% in the past 6 months as of 2025-07-28?", "reference_response": "As of 2025-07-28, Huabao CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Internet ETF Initiated Link C had a return of 5.52% over the past 1 month and 28.56% over the past 6 months; Guotai Communication Equipment A had a return of 16.01% over the past 1 month and 21.80% over the past 6 months; Nanfang Fuyuan Steady One-Year Pension A had a return of 1.29% over the past 1 month and 5.26% over the past 6 months. Only Guotai Communication Equipment A simultaneously meets the conditions of having a return exceeding 10% over the past 1 month and exceeding 20% over the past 6 months.", "response_final_reference": "Guotai Communication Equipment A", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_1hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_1", "prompt": "For Junsheng Electronics, between the Q1 single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-02-08 and the Q3 single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-09-05, on which date did the single-quarter report show net profit attributable to the parent exceeding 300 million yuan and R&D expenses below 610 million yuan? On that date, what were the since-inception returns of the five funds: Huitianfu Xintianli 6-Month Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A, ChinaAMC Semiconductor Materials Equipment ETF Link A, CCB Longxiang Steady Progress 6-Month Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) C, Bosera Jixing Allocation Preferred 6-Month Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A, and Harvest CSI 500 ETF Link C, respectively? Among them, which two funds ranked highest in since-inception return?", "reference_response": "Only the Q1 single-quarter report corresponding to February 8, 2024 simultaneously meets the conditions of attributable net profit exceeding RMB 300 million (RMB 307 million) and R&D expenses being below RMB 610 million (RMB 605 million). On 2024-02-08, the return since inception of Huitianfu Xintianli 6-Month Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A was 0.8%, ChinaAMC Semiconductor Materials Equipment ETF Feeder A was -0.96%, CCB Longxiang Steady Progress 6-Month Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) C was -8.4%, Bosera Jixing Allocation Select 6-Month Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A was -0.59%, and Harvest CSI 500 ETF Feeder C was 17.26437%. Among them, the top two in return since inception were Harvest CSI 500 ETF Feeder C (17.26437%) and Huitianfu Xintianli 6-Month Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A (0.8%).", "response_final_reference": "Since inception, the return rates are 0.8% for Huitianfu Xintianli 6-Month Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A, -0.96% for ChinaAMC Semiconductor Materials Equipment ETF Feeder A, -8.4% for CCB Longxiang Steady Progress 6-Month Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) C, -0.59% for Bosera Jixing Allocation Preferred 6-Month Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A, and 17.26437% for Harvest CSI 500 ETF Feeder C. Among them, the top two funds with the highest returns since inception are Harvest CSI 500 ETF Feeder C (17.26437%) and Huitianfu Xintianli 6-Month Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A (0.8%).", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_10", "prompt": "On what date was Yongding Co., Ltd.'s 2023 Q1 single-quarter report released? On the release date, between the two funds Guoshou AMP Target Retirement Date 2030 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF) Y and Qianhai Kaiyuan CSI Hong Kong-Shenzhen Lifestyle Flexible Allocation Hybrid, which fund had a return over the past week higher than -5% and a return over the past 1 month greater than 0%?", "reference_response": "Yongding Co., Ltd.'s 2023 Q1 quarterly report was released on April 27, 2023. On April 27, 2023, the return over the past week of Guoshou Ampao Target Date 2030 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF) Y was -2.268547%, which was higher than -5%; however, its return over the past 1 month was -0.778089%, which was lower than 0%. The return over the past 1 month of Qianhai Kaiyuan Shanghai-Hong Kong-Shenzhen Flexible Allocation Hybrid for Enjoying Life was 5.631202%, which was higher than 0%; however, its return over the past week was -6.001951%, which was lower than -5%. Therefore, no fund simultaneously satisfies the conditions that the return over the past week is higher than -5% and the return over the past 1 month is greater than 0%.", "response_final_reference": "No fund simultaneously meets the conditions of having a return rate higher than -5% over the past week and a return rate greater than 0% over the past 1 month.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_11", "prompt": "Between the two funds, Harvest CSI 300 Index Enhanced C and GF SZSE 100 Index C, as of 2024-08-16, which fund had the higher return over the past 3 months? For the fund category of that fund, among the three dates 2024-09-05, 2024-09-11, and 2024-09-26, on which date was the peer-category average one-month return the highest?", "reference_response": "On 2024-08-16, the return of Harvest CSI 300 Index Research Enhanced C over the past 3 months was -7.643863%, and the return of GF SZSE 100 Index C over the past 3 months was -11.520146%. Therefore, Harvest CSI 300 Index Research Enhanced C had the highest return (a smaller negative value indicates better performance); the peer-category average one-month return on 2024-09-26 was the highest, at 0.0635%.", "response_final_reference": "2024-09-26", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_12", "prompt": "For XinYuan XinSelect Stable Pension Target One-Year Holding Partial Bond Mixed (FOF) Y, on which of the two dates, 2025-03-06 and 2025-09-03, was the recent 1-month return greater than 0.2% and the year-to-date return greater than 2%? In the cumulative quarterly report corresponding to that date, among the four companies China Construction Bank, Zhejiang Construction Investment, Hailanxin, and Jinbin Development, which two companies had the lowest asset-liability ratios?", "reference_response": "2025-03-06: The past 1-month return of Xinyuan Xinxuan Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Partial Bond Hybrid (FOF) Y was 0.048%, and the return year-to-date was 0.719%; 2025-09-03: the past 1-month return was 0.284%, and the return year-to-date was 2.740%. Only 2025-09-03 meets the conditions that the past 1-month return is greater than 0.2% and the year-to-date return is greater than 2%. In the corresponding cumulative Q3 quarterly report on September 3, 2025, China Construction Bank's asset-liability ratio was 91.94%, Zhejiang Construction Investment's asset-liability ratio was 91.91%, Hailanxin's asset-liability ratio was 21.83%, and Jinbin Development's asset-liability ratio was 29.31%. A lower asset-liability ratio indicates lower financial risk; therefore, the two with the lowest asset-liability ratios are Hailanxin and Jinbin Development.", "response_final_reference": "Hi-Target, Tianjin Development Zone", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_13", "prompt": "For the two funds, CSC Financial Minxiang Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) and GF CSI 500 ETF Linked C, which fund had a higher return ranking percentile at the end of 2023? For that fund and the other fund, which fund had the lower return rate over the past month on 2024-07-16?", "reference_response": "At the end of 2023, CITIC Securities Construction Investment Minxiang Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) had a return ranking of 710 (out of 1,806 funds in the same category), with percentile = 710/1806 ≈ 39.3%; GF CSI 500 ETF Link C had a return ranking of 931 (out of 2,226 funds in the same category), with percentile = 931/2226 ≈ 41.8%. According to the rule that a lower percentile indicates a higher ranking, CITIC Securities Construction Investment Minxiang Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) has the lower percentile and ranks higher. On 2024-07-16, CITIC Securities Construction Investment Minxiang Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) had a return rate of -0.178802% over the past month, while GF CSI 500 ETF Link C had a return rate of -5.134249% over the past month. Therefore, GF CSI 500 ETF Link C had the lowest return rate over the past month.", "response_final_reference": "GF CSI 500 ETF Feeder C has the lowest return over the past month", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_14", "prompt": "Among the three funds—Southern S&P China A-Share Large-Cap Dividend Low Volatility 50 ETF Link I, BCOM Schroder Zhaoxiang One-Year Mixed C, and JYSS Yuanqi Flexible Allocation Mixed—which fund, on September 24, 2025, simultaneously satisfied that the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV exceeded 1% and the return rate over the past 1 year exceeded 50%? On which dates were the last 5 historical average return rate data points published in December 2024 for the fund category to which that fund belongs?", "reference_response": "Data as of September 24, 2025 show: CSOP S&P China A-Share Large-Cap Dividend Low Volatility 50 ETF Feeder I had a daily growth rate of adjusted unit NAV of 0.46%, with a return of 14.46% over the past year; BCOM Zhaoxiang One-Year Mixed C had a daily growth rate of adjusted unit NAV of 0.15%, with a return of 6.07% over the past year; Jinyuan Shun'an Yuanqi Flexible Allocation Mixed had a daily growth rate of adjusted unit NAV of 1.18%, with a return of 54.12% over the past year. Only Jinyuan Shun'an Yuanqi Flexible Allocation Mixed simultaneously meets the conditions of adjusted unit NAV daily growth rate exceeding 1% and past 1-year return exceeding 50%. The last 5 dates in December 2024 on which the fund category to which Jinyuan Shun'an Yuanqi Flexible Allocation Mixed belongs published historical average return data were December 31, 2024, December 30, 2024, December 27, 2024, December 26, 2024, and December 25, 2024.", "response_final_reference": "December 31, 2024, December 30, 2024, December 27, 2024, December 26, 2024, and December 25, 2024", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_15", "prompt": "For Tianbao Infrastructure, across the two reporting periods of December 31, 2024 and September 30, 2025, when did the change in the number of shareholders first fall below -15%? On the day when the change in the number of shareholders first fell below -15%, among the four funds Southern Shenzhen Component Index A, Southern ChiNext ETF Feeder E, Ping An SZSE 300 Index Enhanced, and Fullgoal CSI Value ETF Feeder A, which two funds had the highest returns over the past year?", "reference_response": "According to the equity change event records:\n1. For the reporting period ending December 31, 2024 (announcement date March 29, 2025), the number of shareholders decreased by 17.4% compared with the previous period, with a change magnitude of -17.4%\n2. For the reporting period ending September 30, 2025 (announcement date October 25, 2025), the number of shareholders decreased by 12.03% compared with the previous period, with a change magnitude of -12.03%\nThe change magnitude in the number of shareholders for the reporting period ending December 31, 2024, at -17.4%, fell below the -15% threshold for the first time; on December 31, 2024, the one-year return of Southern Shenzhen Component Index A was 10.62233%, the one-year return of Southern ChiNext ETF Feeder E was 14.731533%, the one-year return of Ping An SZSE 300 Index Enhanced was 7.466529%, and the one-year return of Fullgoal CSI Value ETF Feeder A was 17.17285%. By percentile comparison (the higher, the better), the top two were Fullgoal CSI Value ETF Feeder A and Southern ChiNext ETF Feeder E.", "response_final_reference": "Fullgoal CSI Value ETF Feeder A, Southern ChiNext ETF Feeder E", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_16", "prompt": "On 2024-10-21, among Zhichun Technology, CITIC Heavy Industries, Luzhou Laojiao, and Longhua Technology, which two companies ranked first and second respectively by average turnover rate performance? Among those two companies, in the annual reports corresponding to 2024-12-27, which company had the smallest net cash flow from investing activities (by absolute value)?", "reference_response": "On 2024-10-21, the turnover rates of the companies were: PNC Process Systems Co., Ltd. (8.46%), CITIC Heavy Industries (0.95%), Luzhou Laojiao (1.39%), and Longhua Technology (3.83%). Calculated by the quantile mean (i.e., the turnover rate on that day), the top two were PNC Process Systems Co., Ltd. (8.46%) and Longhua Technology (3.83%). In the corresponding annual reports dated 2024-12-27, the net cash flow from investing activities of PNC Process Systems Co., Ltd. was -745,621,478.99 yuan, and that of Longhua Technology was -269,815,766.63 yuan. The smaller the absolute value of net cash flow from investing activities, the relatively smaller the scale of cash outflow. Therefore, the absolute value of Longhua Technology’s net cash flow from investing activities (269,815,766.63 yuan) is smaller than that of PNC Process Systems Co., Ltd. (745,621,478.99 yuan), so Longhua Technology performed better.", "response_final_reference": "Longhua Technology", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_17", "prompt": "For Antong Holdings and Mankun Technology, based on the quarterly financial report periods corresponding to February 12, 2025, which company had a higher year-over-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company? For the company with the higher year-over-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company, what were the net profits attributable to the parent company for the quarterly financial report periods corresponding to 2024-02-08 and 2025-08-08, respectively? Which quarter had the higher net profit attributable to the parent company?", "reference_response": "In the quarterly financial reporting period corresponding to February 12, 2025 (the single-quarter report for Q1 2025), Antong Holdings' year-over-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company was 371.53%, while Mankun Technology's year-over-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company was 313.78%. Therefore, Antong Holdings had the higher year-over-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company. In Q1 2024 (corresponding date: 2024-02-08), Antong Holdings' net profit attributable to the parent company was 51204491.13 yuan, and in Q2 2025 (corresponding date: 2025-08-08), the net profit attributable to the parent company was 270706070.79 yuan. Among these, the net profit attributable to the parent company in Q2 2025 was higher, approximately 271 million yuan.", "response_final_reference": "In Q2 2025, net profit attributable to the parent was higher, at approximately RMB 271 million.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_18", "prompt": "What was the publication date of Qiaofeng Intelligent's 2024 annual report? On that date, among the four funds—ChinaAMC CSI Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF Link A, Great Wall Hengkang Steady Pension One-Year Mixed (FOF) Y, CEIBS Qianjian Aggressive Pension Target Five-Year Holding Mixed Initiated (FOF) A, and Penghua Changzhi Steady Pension One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A—which two funds had the highest return rates since inception?", "reference_response": "Qiaofeng Intelligent's 2024 Annual Report was released on April 25, 2025; on that date, the return since inception of ChinaAMC CSI Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF Link A was -15.24%, the return since inception of Great Wall Hengkang Steady Pension One-Year Hybrid (FOF) Y was 5.34%, the return since inception of CEIBS Foreseen Active Pension Target Five-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A was 2.31%, and the return since inception of Penghua Changzhi Steady Pension One-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A was -4.99%; by percentile comparison (the higher the indicator value, the smaller the percentile, and the higher the ranking), the top two were Great Wall Hengkang Steady Pension One-Year Hybrid (FOF) Y and CEIBS Foreseen Active Pension Target Five-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A.", "response_final_reference": "Great Wall Hengkang Steady Pension One-Year Mixed (FOF) Y, CEIBS Foreseen Active Pension Target Five-Year Holding Mixed Initiated (FOF) A", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_19", "prompt": "When was Kaige Precision Machinery listed? On the day Kaige Precision Machinery was listed, what were the respective returns over the past 3 months of the three funds Nanfang Fuyuan Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) A, SDIC UBS New Energy Hybrid C, and Nanfang CSI 500 Information ETF Link A? Which fund had the highest return over the past 3 months?", "reference_response": "Kaige Precision Machinery was listed on the A-share market on August 16, 2022. As of August 16, 2022, the nearly 3-month return rates were 2.38% for Southern Fuyuan Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A, 27.64% for SDIC UBS New Energy Mixed C, and 19.46% for Southern CSI 500 Information ETF Link A; the fund with the highest nearly 3-month return rate was SDIC UBS New Energy Mixed C, with a corresponding indicator value of approximately 27.64%.", "response_final_reference": "SDIC UBS New Energy Hybrid C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_2", "prompt": "On what date was Antong Holdings' 2024 interim report released? On that date, among the three funds Huaxia Juhong Preferred One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) C, China Merchants Innovation Growth Hybrid C, and Penghua Target Date 2045 Pension Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return over 0% in the past 6 months and a year-to-date return over 0%?", "reference_response": "Antong Holdings' 2024 interim report was released on August 27, 2024. As of August 27, 2024, ChinaAMC Juhong Select One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) C: return over the past 6 months 1.139485%, year-to-date return 1.885826%; China Merchants Innovation Growth Hybrid C: return over the past 6 months -17.186251%, year-to-date return -26.597704%; Penghua Pension Target Date 2045 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF): return over the past 6 months 0.72832%, year-to-date return -3.598638%. Only ChinaAMC Juhong Select One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) C simultaneously meets the conditions that the return over the past 6 months exceeds 0% and the year-to-date return exceeds 0%.", "response_final_reference": "ChinaAMC Juhong Preferred One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_20", "prompt": "On which day did Pengyang CSI 500 Quality Growth Index C record its largest single-day decline in June 2024? In the cumulative report corresponding to that day, among the four companies Anning Holdings, Dowstone Technology, FiberHome Telecommunication, and Lingyi iTech, which company had monetary funds exceeding RMB 3.5 billion and contract liabilities below RMB 100 million?", "reference_response": "Pengyang CSI 500 Quality Growth Index C recorded its largest single-day decline on June 27, 2024, with a daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV of -1.82%. In the corresponding semiannual report for June 27, 2024 (with the statistical cutoff date of June 30, 2024): Anning Co., Ltd. had monetary funds of RMB 2,688,020,694.85 (approximately RMB 2.688 billion) and contract liabilities of RMB 83,031,231.25 (approximately RMB 0.083 billion); Dowstone Technology had monetary funds of RMB 3,451,884,711.60 (approximately RMB 3.452 billion) and contract liabilities of RMB 22,528,868.74 (approximately RMB 0.023 billion); FiberHome Telecommunication had monetary funds of RMB 3,851,527,488.85 (approximately RMB 3.852 billion) and contract liabilities of RMB 758,939,972.59 (approximately RMB 0.759 billion); Lingyi iTech had monetary funds of RMB 4,124,551,547.22 (approximately RMB 4.125 billion) and contract liabilities of RMB 55,627,644.42 (approximately RMB 0.056 billion). Only Lingyi iTech simultaneously met the conditions of monetary funds exceeding RMB 3.5 billion (actual: RMB 4.125 billion) and contract liabilities below RMB 0.1 billion (actual: RMB 0.056 billion).", "response_final_reference": "Lingyi Zhizao", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_21", "prompt": "Among the three days of June 12, 2025, August 21, 2025, and November 17, 2025, for GF Pension Target 2060 Five-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A, which two days ranked in the top two by the average three-month return rate among peers? Among those two top-ranked days, during the corresponding financial report periods, how should the two time points be ranked based on the average performance of net profit margin on sales for Thaihot Advanced Material, Sinocera New Materials, New Media Co., Ltd., S Giti, and Inspur Information?", "reference_response": "On June 12, 2025, the peer average three-month return rate was -0.0096%; on August 21, 2025, it was 0.1321%; and on November 17, 2025, it was 0.0729%. Comparing by percentile ranking (the higher, the better): August 21, 2025 ranked 1st (0.1321%), November 17, 2025 ranked 2nd (0.0729%), and June 12, 2025 ranked 3rd (-0.0096%). Therefore, the top two dates are August 21, 2025 and November 17, 2025. Among those two top-ranked dates, on 2025-08-21 (semiannual report): Taihe New Material had a net sales margin of 0.60%, Xinlai Applied Materials 7.63%, New Media Co., Ltd. 42.28%, S Jiaotong 5.05%, and Inspur Information 1.00%, with an average of 11.112%; on 2025-11-17 (Q3 cumulative quarterly report): Taihe New Material 0.49%, Xinlai Applied Materials 6.41%, New Media Co., Ltd. 41.36%, S Jiaotong 6.85%, and Inspur Information 1.23%, with an average of 11.268%. Ranked by average net sales margin performance from high to low: 2025-11-17 (11.268%) is better than 2025-08-21 (11.112%).", "response_final_reference": "2025-11-17 (11.268%) is better than 2025-08-21 (11.112%)", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_22", "prompt": "For the two funds Tianhong CSI 500 ETF Link A and China Merchants Shengxin Select 3-Month Holding Period Mixed (FOF) A, on 2024-01-10, which fund had the higher return since inception? For that fund, comparing the annual return ranking percentiles for the two years 2023 and 2024, which is the only year below 0.41?", "reference_response": "As of 2024-01-10, the return since inception of Tianhong CSI 500 ETF Linked A was -0.73%, and the return since inception of China Merchants Shengxin Preferred 3-Month Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A was -24.48%. Although both funds had negative returns since inception, Tianhong CSI 500 ETF Linked A had a relatively higher return (a smaller loss). Therefore, Tianhong CSI 500 ETF Linked A had the highest return since inception. In 2023, the return ranking percentile of Tianhong CSI 500 ETF Linked A was 0.4016 (ranked 894/2226); in 2024, the return ranking percentile was 0.601 (ranked 1787/2974). Only the 2023 percentile was below 0.41.", "response_final_reference": "2023", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_23", "prompt": "On which date among *ST Tianshan’s Q1 single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-02-15, the interim report corresponding to 2024-08-12, the interim report corresponding to 2024-08-13, and the Q3 cumulative quarterly report corresponding to 2025-11-10, was total current liabilities below RMB 100 million and total shareholders’ equity above RMB 40 million? On that date that meets the condition, among the three funds—Harvest CSI Agriculture ETF Initiated Link A, Southern CSI Bank ETF Initiated Link I, and Fullgoal ChiNext Artificial Intelligence ETF Initiated Link C—which two funds ranked in the top two by return over the past 1 month, from highest to lowest?", "reference_response": "Only November 10, 2025 meets the conditions that total current liabilities are less than 100 million yuan (100,000,000 yuan) and total shareholders' equity is greater than 40 million yuan (40,000,000 yuan). Data for November 25, 2025: Harvest CSI Agriculture ETF Feeder A 1-month return: 1.716268029943%, China Southern CSI Bank ETF Feeder I 1-month return: 1.648027917432%, Fullgoal ChiNext AI ETF Feeder C 1-month return: -4.606949587012%. By percentile comparison (the higher the return, the smaller the percentile), the top two are: Harvest CSI Agriculture ETF Feeder A (percentile 0%) and China Southern CSI Bank ETF Feeder I (percentile 50%).", "response_final_reference": "Harvest CSI Big Agriculture ETF Initiated Feeder A and Southern CSI Bank ETF Initiated Feeder I", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_24", "prompt": "When was China Merchants CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF Feeder A established? In the quarterly report corresponding to the day it was established, among the three companies Zhejiang Medicine, Baoti Co., Ltd., and Huace Film & TV, which company had monetary funds exceeding RMB 2 billion and accounts receivable below RMB 1.2 billion?", "reference_response": "China Merchants CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF Link A was established on February 14, 2023. In the single-quarter report for Q1 2023, Zhejiang Medicine had monetary funds of approximately 1.404 billion yuan and accounts receivable of approximately 1.402 billion yuan; Baoti Co., Ltd. had monetary funds of approximately 826 million yuan and accounts receivable of approximately 2.672 billion yuan; Huace Film & TV had monetary funds of approximately 2.726 billion yuan and accounts receivable of approximately 1.027 billion yuan. Only Huace Film & TV meets the conditions of monetary funds exceeding 2 billion yuan and accounts receivable being below 1.2 billion yuan.", "response_final_reference": "Huace Film & TV", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_25", "prompt": "For China Merchants CSI Dividend ETF Connect A, on which of the two dates, 2024-03-26 and 2025-08-01, was the 1-year return higher? In the cumulative report corresponding to the day with the higher 1-year return, which company had the higher net sales margin, Geely Automobile-R or Kanghua Biological?", "reference_response": "2025-08-01, because China Merchants CSI Dividend ETF Linked A had a past 1-year return of 6.543397% on 2024-03-26, while its past 1-year return on 2025-08-01 was 9.854973295403%, the past 1-year return was higher on 2025-08-01. In the semiannual report corresponding to 2025-08-01 (with the statistical cutoff date of 2025-6-30), Kanghua Biological (300841.SZ) had a net profit margin on sales of 23.67%, and Geely Automobile-R (80175.HK) had a net profit margin on sales of 6.29%; Kanghua Biological had the higher net profit margin on sales.", "response_final_reference": "Kanghua Biological", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_26", "prompt": "Among the five companies Guansheng Co., Ltd., Dahua Technology, Nord Co., Ltd., Hundsun Electronics, and Xinghua New Materials, which company had the highest net cash flow from operating activities in the single-quarter report for the first quarter of 2025? On what date was that company's 2023 annual report released?", "reference_response": "The net cash flow from operating activities data for the single quarter report of Q1 2025 is as follows: Guansheng Co., Ltd. was -137,607,237.29 yuan, Dahua Co., Ltd. was -671,695,394.62 yuan, Nord Co., Ltd. was 131,498,074.87 yuan, Hundsun Electronics was -1,057,367,227.62 yuan, and Xinghua New Materials was 34,576,595.91 yuan. Among them, Nord Co., Ltd. had the highest net cash flow from operating activities, reaching 131,498,074.87 yuan; Nord Co., Ltd.'s 2023 annual report was released on April 22, 2025", "response_final_reference": "April 22, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_27", "prompt": "Among Southern Haowen Preferred 9-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) C and GF CSI 300 ETF Feeder Y, based on the average performance of year-to-date return (%) on the two dates 2025-03-21 and 2025-09-19, which fund performed best? For that fund, based on the average performance of the peer-category average three-month return on the three dates 2024-01-16, 2024-04-29, and 2025-02-14, which were the top two dates, respectively?", "reference_response": "The year-to-date return of Southern Haowen Preferred 9-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) C on 2025-03-21 was 0.074287306157%, and on 2025-09-19 it was 3.723651221098%, with an average value of 1.8989692636275%; the year-to-date return of GF CSI 300 ETF Feeder Y on 2025-03-21 was -0.38%, and on 2025-09-19 it was 15.44%, with an average value of 7.53%. Ranked by average performance, GF CSI 300 ETF Feeder Y (7.53%) performed best, followed by Southern Haowen Preferred 9-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) C (1.90%).; 2024-01-16 (peer-category average three-month return -0.0810%), 2024-04-29 (peer-category average three-month return 0.0943%), 2025-02-14 (peer-category average three-month return -0.0047%); calculated by equal-weight averaging, the comprehensive score ranking is 2024-04-29, 2025-02-14, 2024-01-16, and the top two dates are 2024-04-29 and 2025-02-14", "response_final_reference": "2024-04-29 and 2025-02-14", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_28", "prompt": "Among the three funds Yongying CSI 300 C, Southern CSI 300 Feeder A, and ChinaAMC Utilities ETF Feeder C, which fund had a return ranking below 1000 and a percentage change exceeding 0.15% at the end of 2024? For that fund, on which date was the nearly 3-month return higher, 2025-02-21 or 2025-07-18?", "reference_response": "At the end of 2024, Yongying CSI 300 C had a return ranking of 1017 (out of 2,974 funds in the same category), with a price change of 0.1585%; Southern CSI 300 Link A had a return ranking of 936 (out of 2,974 funds in the same category), with a price change of 0.1657%; ChinaAMC Utilities ETF Link C had a return ranking of 2287 (out of 2,974 funds in the same category), with a price change of -0.0047%. Only Southern CSI 300 Link A satisfies the conditions of having a return ranking below 1000 (rank 936 < 1000) and a price change exceeding 0.15% (0.1657% > 0.15%); on 2025-07-18, Southern CSI 300 Link A had a return rate over the past 3 months of 8.76%, while on 2025-02-21 its return rate over the past 3 months was 0.029%, therefore the return rate over the past 3 months was highest on 2025-07-18.", "response_final_reference": "2025-07-18", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_29", "prompt": "For Southern CSI Robot ETF Initiated Link C, among the four time points 2024-02-21, 2024-04-05, 2024-10-03, and 2025-10-30, when did the unit NAV first exceed RMB 1.4? In the cumulative quarterly report for the quarter corresponding to the day it first exceeded RMB 1.4, among the three companies Tianfeng Securities, Giantstar Technology, and CSC Financial, which company had the highest year-on-year growth rate in net profit attributable to the parent company?", "reference_response": "Among the four given points in time, the first time it exceeded 1.4 yuan was 2025-10-30; the cumulative Q3 quarterly report corresponding to October 30, 2025 shows that TF Securities' year-on-year growth in net profit attributable to the parent company was 128.55%, GreatStar Tools' year-on-year growth in net profit attributable to the parent company was 11.35%, and CSC Financial's year-on-year growth in net profit attributable to the parent company was 64.95%. Therefore, TF Securities had the highest year-on-year growth rate in net profit attributable to the parent company.", "response_final_reference": "Tianfeng Securities", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_3", "prompt": "On what date did Amass Information first release its financial report in 2025? On that date, among the three funds—Zhongou Select 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A, ChinaAMC Jujia Preferred 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A, and Changxin U.S. S&P 100 Equal Weight Index Enhanced (QDII)—which two funds had the highest returns over the past 3 months?", "reference_response": "Arshine Information first released a financial report in 2025 on April 28, 2025, and it was the First Quarter Report of 2025; as of April 28, 2025, the return over the past 3 months for Zhongou Select 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A was 2.285495403473%, the return over the past 3 months for ChinaAMC Jujia Preferred 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A was 1.331707774547%, and the return over the past 3 months for Changxin U.S. S&P 100 Equal Weight Index Enhanced (QDII) was -6.048203728967%. Therefore, the top two funds with the highest returns over the past 3 months were Zhongou Select 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A and ChinaAMC Jujia Preferred 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A.", "response_final_reference": "Zhongou Selected 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A and ChinaAMC Jujia Preferred 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_30", "prompt": "What is the release date of Dongshan Precision's 2025 third-quarter report? On that date, between the two funds Pengyang CSI Digital Economy Theme ETF Link A and Guotai Steady Income One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF), which fund had the higher return over the past 6 months?", "reference_response": "The release date of Dongshan Precision's Q3 2025 report is October 22, 2025. As of October 22, 2025, Pengyang CSI Digital Economy Theme ETF Link A had a return rate of 32.462% over the past 6 months, while Guotai Steady Income One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return rate of 17.166% over the past 6 months. Comparing by quantile ranking (the higher the return rate, the higher the rank), Pengyang CSI Digital Economy Theme ETF Link A ranked 1st, and Guotai Steady Income One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) ranked 2nd. Therefore, Pengyang CSI Digital Economy Theme ETF Link A had the higher return rate over the past 6 months.", "response_final_reference": "Pengyang CSI Digital Economy Theme ETF Feeder A had a higher return over the past 6 months", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_31", "prompt": "As of December 10, 2025, what are all the block trading dates for Xinhuangpu in July 2025? Among those dates, when did the average one-month return of the same category as ChinaAMC CSI Dividend Low Volatility ETF Initiated Link A first exceed 0.08%?", "reference_response": "As of December 10, 2025, all block trade dates for Xinhuangpu in July 2025 were July 25, 2025, July 29, 2025, and July 31, 2025. On 2025-07-25, the peer average one-month return was 0.0650%, below 0.08%; on 2025-07-29, the return was 0.0802%, exceeding 0.08%; on 2025-07-31, the return was 0.0511%, below 0.08%. Therefore, the first time the peer average one-month return exceeded 0.08% was 2025-07-29.", "response_final_reference": "2025-07-29", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_32", "prompt": "For the two funds, China Merchants CSI Consumer 80 ETF Feeder and Orient Securities Asset Management Hong Xinhe Balanced Two-Year Mixed (FOF), as of 2024-06-19, which fund had the higher return over the past 6 months? What was the average return since inception for its peer category on 2025-10-28?", "reference_response": "On 2024-06-19, the return rate over the past 6 months for China Merchants Consumer 80 ETF Link (fund code: 217017.OF) was: -3.742812%; the return rate over the past 6 months for Orient Hong Xinhe Balanced Two-Year Mixed (FOF) (fund code: 011587.OF) was: 1.966356%. Comparing by percentile (the higher the return rate, the higher the ranking), the fund ranked No. 1 is Orient Hong Xinhe Balanced Two-Year Mixed (FOF). According to data updated on 2025-12-10 01:30:12, the average return since inception for the same category of the Hybrid - Balanced fund classification (code 1203), to which Orient Hong Xinhe Balanced Two-Year Mixed (FOF) belongs, was 10.6937% on 2025-10-28.", "response_final_reference": "10.6937%", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_33", "prompt": "When was Dashenlin listed? On the day that company went public, what were the respective returns over the past 1 month for the five funds JiaShi CSI STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C, Ping An CSI Hong Kong Stocks Pharmaceutical ETF Link C, China Merchants Zhaocheng Semi-annual Regular Open Bond Initiated, Guotai Preferred Navigation One-year Holding Mixed (FOF), and ICBC STAR ETF Link Y? Which fund had the highest return over the past 1 month?", "reference_response": "Dashenlin was listed on the A-share market on July 31, 2017. As of 2025-12-04, the 1-month return of Harvest CSI STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C was -1.25%, Ping An CSI Hong Kong-Listed Shares Pharmaceutical ETF Link C was 0.53%, China Merchants Zhaocheng Semi-Annual Fixed Open Bond Initiative was -0.23%, Guotai Selected Navigation One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) was -2.66%, and ICBC STAR ETF Link Y was -4.19%; the highest 1-month return was Ping An CSI Hong Kong-Listed Shares Pharmaceutical ETF Link C, at 0.53%.", "response_final_reference": "Ping An CSI Hong Kong Stocks Healthcare ETF Feeder C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_34", "prompt": "On 2024-09-30, 2025-08-25, and 2025-11-19, for Xinhua Department Store, Azure Lithium Core, and Bohai Chemical, which two dates ranked first and second respectively by average turnover rate performance? Between those two dates, on which date was the average one-year return rate of comparable companies for Hang Seng Tech higher?", "reference_response": "Xinhua Department Store, Azure Lithium Core, and Bohai Chemical, on the three days 2024-09-30, 2025-08-25, and 2025-11-19, ranked by average turnover rate performance, the top two days were 2025-08-25 and 2024-09-30 respectively, with 2025-08-25 having the higher average turnover rate (6.71% vs 6.45%); among these two days, the day with the higher average turnover rate performance was 2025-08-25, and Hang Seng Tech had a higher comparable average one-year return rate on 2025-08-25 (0.5242% vs 0.0572%).", "response_final_reference": "2025-08-25", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_35", "prompt": "Among the four companies Haixin Foods, Heshun Petroleum, Yongding Co., Ltd., and Binhai Energy, which two companies had the highest net inflow of main funds on 2024-09-18? Among those two companies with the highest net inflow of main funds, in the corresponding annual reports on December 4, 2024, which company had a gross profit margin on sales higher than 15% and an asset-liability ratio lower than 50%?", "reference_response": "On 2024-09-18, the net inflow of main funds for Haixin Foods was 2,382,854.30 yuan, for Heshun Petroleum was -1,629,934.00 yuan, for Yongding Co., Ltd. was -5,633,251.04 yuan, and for Binhai Energy was 1,006,860.00 yuan; by percentile comparison, the top two were Haixin Foods and Binhai Energy. Among these two companies with the highest net inflow of main funds, the annual reports corresponding to 2024-12-04 showed that Binhai Energy had a gross sales margin of 6.15% and an asset-liability ratio of 81.61%; Haixin Foods had a gross sales margin of 18.52% and an asset-liability ratio of 47.41%. Only Haixin Foods simultaneously satisfies the conditions of a gross sales margin higher than 15% and an asset-liability ratio lower than 50%.", "response_final_reference": "Haixin Foods", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_36", "prompt": "Among the four companies Shenzhen SEG, Mega Chip Paint, Estun, and ZP Tech, on 2024-09-06, when ranked by turnover rate from highest to lowest, which two companies had the highest turnover rates? Among those two companies with the highest turnover rates, in the corresponding quarterly financial report period on 2024-03-20 (2024 Q1 single-quarter report), which company had the higher net sales margin?", "reference_response": "On 2024-09-06, Shenzhen SEG had a turnover rate of 11.78%, McGonagall Chip Color had a turnover rate of 2.15%, Estun had a turnover rate of 0.77%, and Zhanpeng Technology had a turnover rate of 0.49%. Comparing by turnover rate percentile (the higher, the earlier the rank), the top two were Shenzhen SEG (100th percentile) and McGonagall Chip Color (75th percentile). Among these two companies with the highest turnover rates, for the quarterly financial report corresponding to 2024-03-20 (2024 Q1 single-quarter report), Shenzhen SEG's net sales margin was 6.00%, and McGonagall Chip Color's net sales margin was 9.36%; therefore, McGonagall Chip Color had the higher net sales margin.", "response_final_reference": "Makka Core Color", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_37", "prompt": "What is the release date of *ST Aowei's 2025 semiannual report? On the day the semiannual report was released, which two companies among Tongyu Communication, Great Wall Securities, Dragon Resources, and Joyson Electronics had the highest trading volume?", "reference_response": "*ST Aowei's 2025 semiannual report was released on August 28, 2025. On August 28, 2025, Tongyu Communication had a trading volume of 97,303,000 shares, Great Wall Securities had a trading volume of 233,641,600 shares, Dragon Resources had a trading volume of 1,057,000 shares, and Junsheng Electronics had a trading volume of 52,148,400 shares. Comparing by percentile (the higher the trading volume, the smaller the percentile), the two companies with the highest trading volumes are Great Wall Securities and Tongyu Communication.", "response_final_reference": "Great Wall Securities and Tongyu Communication", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_38", "prompt": "When was PetroChina listed? On that day, which company had the lower turnover rate, Seiko Steel Structure or China Fortune Land Development?", "reference_response": "PetroChina was listed on the A-share market on November 5, 2007; on 2007-11-05, Seiko Steel Structure had a turnover rate of 1.65%, and China Fortune had a turnover rate of 0.95%; by percentile comparison (the lower the value, the higher the ranking), China Fortune had the lowest turnover rate and ranked first; Seiko Steel Structure ranked second.", "response_final_reference": "China Fortune Land Development", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_39", "prompt": "In Montage Technology’s interim report corresponding to 2024-08-02, the interim report corresponding to 2025-08-13, and the cumulative Q3 quarterly report corresponding to 2025-11-20, when did monetary funds first exceed RMB 8.8 billion? At the quarterly financial report date corresponding to the day it first exceeded RMB 8.8 billion, among Shenghe Resources, Tinci Materials, and Meituan-WR, which company had the highest year-on-year growth rate in net profit attributable to the parent company?", "reference_response": "In the semiannual report corresponding to 2024-08-02, monetary funds were 5.852 billion yuan; in the semiannual report corresponding to 2025-08-13, monetary funds were 8.353 billion yuan; and in the cumulative Q3 quarterly report corresponding to 2025-11-20, monetary funds were 8.899 billion yuan. Therefore, the first time it exceeded 8.8 billion yuan was 2025-11-20. In the quarterly financial report corresponding to 2025-11-20 (the 2025 Q3 cumulative quarterly report), Shenghe Resources' year-over-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent was 748.07%, Tianci Materials' year-over-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent was 24.33%, and Meituan-WR's year-over-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent was -127.41%. Therefore, Shenghe Resources had the highest year-over-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent.", "response_final_reference": "Shenghe Resources", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_4", "prompt": "On the six trading days 2025-11-28, 2025-12-01, 2025-12-02, 2025-12-03, 2025-12-04, and 2025-12-05, among Haitian Flavouring and Food and Haixin Foods, which stocks rose on at least one trading day? Among the companies whose stock rose on at least one trading day, in the corresponding Q2 single-quarter report on 2025-06-04, which company had net profit exceeding 100 million yuan and financial expenses below 0 yuan?", "reference_response": "Haitian Flavouring and Food rose by 0.54% on 2025-12-01, and Haixin Foods rose on 2025-12-01 (9.94%), 2025-12-02 (20.99%), 2025-12-03 (33.15%), 2025-12-04 (19.89%), and 2025-12-05 (31.9%), so both stocks had at least one trading day with gains; according to the 2025 Q2 single-quarter report data: Haitian Flavouring and Food had net profit of RMB 1,714,712,538.33 (exceeding RMB 100 million) and financial expenses of RMB -116,599,512.77 (below RMB 0), while Haixin Foods had net profit of RMB -21,436,932.62 (not exceeding RMB 100 million) and financial expenses of RMB 3,810,163.71 (not below RMB 0). Only Haitian Flavouring and Food simultaneously meets the conditions of net profit exceeding RMB 100 million and financial expenses below RMB 0.", "response_final_reference": "Haitian Flavouring and Food", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_40", "prompt": "Among the four time points for Xiaomi Group—February 5, 2024 (corresponding to the single-quarter report for Q1 2024), July 25, 2024 (corresponding to the 2024 interim report), October 11, 2024 (corresponding to the cumulative quarterly report for Q3 2024), and April 3, 2025 (corresponding to the single-quarter report for Q1 2025)—when did total shareholders' equity first exceed RMB 200 billion? In the single-quarter report corresponding to the day when total shareholders' equity first exceeded RMB 200 billion, which of the following four companies had the highest net cash flow from operating activities: Maoye Commercial, Shanying International, Yunnan Aluminium, or GAC Group?", "reference_response": "The first time Xiaomi Group's shareholders' equity exceeded RMB 200 billion was on April 3, 2025 (corresponding to the single-quarter report for Q1 2025). In the single-quarter report for Q1 2025, the net cash flow from operating activities was RMB 208,599,999.75 for Maoye Commercial, RMB 266,823,199.25 for Shanying International, RMB 1,740,065,883.26 for Yunnan Aluminium Co., Ltd., and RMB -11,209,828,031 for GAC Group. The highest net cash flow from operating activities was recorded by Yunnan Aluminium Co., Ltd..", "response_final_reference": "Yun Aluminum Co., Ltd.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_41", "prompt": "On the first-quarter single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-02-02, the second-quarter single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-05-16, and the third-quarter single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-08-26 for Financial Street, which two dates rank in the top two by attributable net profit to the parent company performance (the higher the value, the better)? Among those top two dates, on which date did Rongfa Nuclear Power have the highest net inflow of main funds?", "reference_response": "Among Financial Street's performances on 2024-02-02, 2024-05-16, and 2024-08-26, the top two ranked by net profit attributable to the parent company are 2024-02-02 and 2024-08-26. Among those two dates ranking in the top two, Rongfa Nuclear Power's net inflow of main funds was -10,940,279.20 yuan on 2024-02-02 and -2,090,703.00 yuan on 2024-08-26; therefore, 2024-08-26 had the highest net inflow of main funds.", "response_final_reference": "2024-08-26", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_42", "prompt": "Among Yonyou Network, Tuopu Group, Montage Technology, and China Northern Rare Earth, what is the listing date of the company with the highest net inflow of main funds on 2025-09-01?", "reference_response": "On 2025-09-01, Yonyou Network's net main capital inflow was -157,700,395.07 yuan, Tuopu Group's was -310,059,697.45 yuan, Lanqi Technology's was -2,585,707.67 yuan, and Northern Rare Earth's was -683,239,565.41 yuan. Among them, Lanqi Technology had the highest net main capital inflow (i.e., the smallest net outflow), because its figure of -2,585,707.67 yuan was greater than those of the other three companies (Yonyou Network: -157,700,395.07 yuan; Tuopu Group: -310,059,697.45 yuan; Northern Rare Earth: -683,239,565.41 yuan); Lanqi Technology was listed on the A-share market on July 22, 2019.", "response_final_reference": "July 22, 2019", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_43", "prompt": "\"Between the two companies, Flyco Electrical Appliance and Weiyuan Co., Ltd., on 2025-06-02, which company ranked higher in terms of the ratio of net inflow of main funds to free-float market capitalization? For the company with the higher ranking in the ratio of net inflow of main funds to free-float market capitalization, among its single-quarter reports for Q1 2025 and Q2 2025, which two financial report quarters ranked in the top two, in order, based on the average performance of net cash flow from operating activities?\"", "reference_response": "On June 02, 2025, Weiyuan Co., Ltd. ranked higher in the ratio ranking of net inflow of main funds to circulating market value; among Weiyuan Co., Ltd., which ranked higher in the ratio ranking of net inflow of main funds to circulating market value, for Feike Electric and Weiyuan Co., Ltd., in the Q1 2025 quarterly report and the Q2 2025 quarterly report, when ranked by the average performance of net cash flow from operating activities, the top two reporting quarters in order are the Q2 2025 quarterly report and the Q1 2025 quarterly report.", "response_final_reference": "the single-quarter report for Q2 2025 and the single-quarter report for Q1 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_44", "prompt": "Among the four funds GF SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Link C, GF Industry Leading Hybrid A, Ping An CSI 500 ETF, and CEIBS Selected 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A, which two funds had the highest return rates over the past 3 months on 2024-05-08? Among these two funds, on 2024-03-11, which fund had the higher daily growth rate of adjusted unit NAV?", "reference_response": "On 2024-05-08, the returns over the past 3 months for the four funds were: GF SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Link C at 0.764888%, GF Industry Leading Mixed A at 9.52381%, Ping An CSI 500 ETF at 5.514509%, and CEIBS Selected 3-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) A at 8.764215%. Comparing by percentile ranking (the smaller the percentile, the higher the rank): GF Industry Leading Mixed A had a percentile of 0% (the highest), CEIBS Selected 3-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) A had a percentile of 33.33%, Ping An CSI 500 ETF had a percentile of 66.67%, and GF SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Link C had a percentile of 100%. Therefore, the two funds with the highest returns over the past 3 months are GF Industry Leading Mixed A and CEIBS Selected 3-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) A. On 2024-03-11, the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV of GF Industry Leading Mixed A was 0.52%, while the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV of CEIBS Selected 3-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) A was 3.08%. Therefore, CEIBS Selected 3-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) A had the higher daily growth rate.", "response_final_reference": "China Europe Select 3-Month Hold Mixed (FOF) A", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_45", "prompt": "On what date was Yongding Co., Ltd.'s 2024 Q4 single-quarter report released? In the single-quarter reports corresponding to that date, which of the five companies—Nanning Department Store, Guoanda, Ningbo Energy, Fenda Technology, and Xinning Logistics—had the highest monetary funds?", "reference_response": "Yongding Co., Ltd.'s 2024 Q4 single-quarter report was released on April 22, 2025. The data from the 2025 first-quarter single-quarter reports show that Nanning Department Store had monetary funds of 76,250,344.71 yuan, Guoanda had monetary funds of 180,554,381.1 yuan, Ningbo Energy had monetary funds of 633,875,433.14 yuan, Fenda Technology had monetary funds of 1,025,554,967.47 yuan, and Xinning Logistics had monetary funds of 92,632,460.9 yuan. Among them, Fenda Technology had the highest monetary funds, reaching 1.026 billion yuan.", "response_final_reference": "Fenda Technology", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_46", "prompt": "Among the five companies Antong Holdings, Keymed Biosciences-B, Jianfeng Group, Chow Tai Seng, and Jinjiang Online, in their corresponding Q3 single-quarter reports on September 2, 2025, which three companies rank highest in operating profit? For these three companies, among the four dates 2024-05-13, 2024-11-20, 2025-06-26, and 2025-08-25, when ranked by the average single-day price change performance, which two dates rank first and second, respectively?", "reference_response": "In the single-quarter Q3 report corresponding to September 2, 2025, the top three companies by operating profit are Chow Tai Seng, Antong Holdings, and Jianfeng Group. Among the four dates 2024-05-13, 2024-11-20, 2025-06-26, and 2025-08-25, ranked by average single-day price change, the top two dates are 2025-08-25 (average gain of 3.67%) and 2024-05-13 (average gain of 1.50%).", "response_final_reference": "2025-08-25 (average increase of 3.67%), 2024-05-13 (average increase of 1.50%)", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_47", "prompt": "Among the four funds — Yinhua Zunyi Steady Pension One-Year Holding Mixed Initiated (FOF) A, GF SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Link A, HuaBao CSI Intelligent Manufacturing Theme ETF, and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) Y — on 2024-12-30, which fund had the highest return over the past 1 year? For that fund, on which of the following dates — 2024-04-03, 2024-04-09, 2024-04-29, 2025-06-12, 2025-09-02 — did the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV exceed 0.5% while the return over the past 1 month was below 0%?", "reference_response": "On 2024-12-30, the past 1-year returns of the four funds were: Yinhua Zunyi Steady Pension One-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A (012038.OF), 4.520563%; GF SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Feeder A (013810.OF), 17.384319%; HuaBao CSI Intelligent Manufacturing Theme ETF (013475.OF), 9.606004%; and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) Y (017237.OF), 4.930401%. Among them, GF SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Feeder A had the highest return, reaching 17.384319%.; On 2024-04-09, the fund's daily growth rate of adjusted unit NAV was 1.14%, and its past 1-month return was -6.388416%; at other times: on 2024-04-03, the daily growth rate was -1.49% and the past 1-month return was -6.838038%; on 2024-04-29, the daily growth rate was 2.99% and the past 1-month return was 1.611171%; on 2025-06-12, the daily growth rate was -0.28% and the past 1-month return was -2.997238%; on 2025-09-02, the daily growth rate was -2.01% and the past 1-month return was 26.694459%. Only 2024-04-09 simultaneously satisfies the conditions that the daily growth rate of adjusted unit NAV exceeds 0.5% and the past 1-month return is below 0%.", "response_final_reference": "2024-04-09", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_48", "prompt": "When was Tongyuan Kang Pharmaceutical-B listed? On the day Tongyuan Kang Pharmaceutical-B was listed, which company had the higher turnover rate, ST Xiangxue (300147.SZ) or China Software International (00354.HK)?", "reference_response": "ProteLight Pharma-B was listed on the Hong Kong stock market on August 20, 2024. On August 20, 2024, ST Xiangxue had a turnover rate of 21.46%, while Chinasoft International had a turnover rate of 0.96%. Among them, ST Xiangxue's turnover rate was higher.", "response_final_reference": "ST Xiangxue has a higher turnover rate", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_49", "prompt": "On which of 2024-02-23, 2024-10-18, 2025-08-21, and 2025-10-30 was Luxshare Precision's net inflow of main funds lower than -150 million yuan? In the cumulative report corresponding to the day when the net inflow of main funds was lower than -150 million yuan, between Zongshen Power and InnoCare Pharma, which company had a current ratio greater than 1.5 and positive undistributed profits?", "reference_response": "On 2024-02-23, the net inflow of main funds was -146,085,467.17 yuan; on 2024-10-18 it was 263,696,631.64 yuan; on 2025-08-21 it was 787,212,586.26 yuan; and on 2025-10-30 it was -1,667,881,408.96 yuan. Only 2025-10-30 meets the condition that the net inflow of main funds is less than -150 million yuan. In the cumulative report for the third quarter of 2025, Zongshen Power's current ratio = 6.816 billion yuan / 4.331 billion yuan = 1.57 > 1.5, and undistributed profit = 3.222 billion yuan (positive); Innovent Biologics' current ratio = 7.963 billion yuan / 1.218 billion yuan = 6.54 > 1.5, but undistributed profit = -5.585 billion yuan (negative). Therefore, only Zongshen Power simultaneously meets the conditions that the current ratio is greater than 1.5 and undistributed profit is positive.", "response_final_reference": "Zongshen Power", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_5", "prompt": "On what date was the first U.S. CPI data release in 2024? In the quarterly financial reports corresponding to the day that data was released, which two of the four companies—Shenglu Communication, Focus Lightings Tech, Zotye Automobile, and *ST Suwu—had the highest values of total operating revenue?", "reference_response": "The first release of U.S. CPI data in 2024 was on February 13, 2024 (releasing the January 2024 CPI data). The first-quarter 2024 financial reports show that Shenglu Communication's total operating revenue was 279 million yuan, Jucan Optoelectronics' was 600 million yuan, Zotye Automobile's was 113 million yuan, and *ST Suwu (Jiangsu Wuzhong)'s was 425 million yuan. Ranked by total operating revenue from high to low: Jucan Optoelectronics (600 million yuan) ranked first (percentile 100%), *ST Suwu (425 million yuan) ranked second (percentile 67%), Shenglu Communication (279 million yuan) ranked third (percentile 33%), and Zotye Automobile (113 million yuan) ranked fourth (percentile 0%). Therefore, the two companies with the highest total operating revenue are Jucan Optoelectronics and *ST Suwu.", "response_final_reference": "Jucan Optoelectronics and *ST Suwu", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_50", "prompt": "When was EVE Energy listed? In the annual report period corresponding to that date, among Jikai Equipment Manufacturing, Huatian Technology, and Ledman Optoelectronic, which two companies had the lowest asset-liability ratios?", "reference_response": "EVE Energy was listed on the A-share market on October 30, 2009. For the annual report period corresponding to 2009-10-30, Huatian Technology had an asset-liability ratio of 29.89%, Jikai Shares had an asset-liability ratio of 35.62%, and Lehman Optoelectronic had an asset-liability ratio of 33.03%; the lower the asset-liability ratio, the better. Comparing by percentile rank (the smaller the percentile, the higher the ranking), Huatian Technology had the smallest percentile (0), ranking first; Lehman Optoelectronic had the middle percentile (0.5), ranking second; Jikai Shares had the largest percentile (1), ranking third; therefore, the top two are Huatian Technology and Lehman Optoelectronic.", "response_final_reference": "Huatian Technology, Ledman Optoelectronic", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_6", "prompt": "On what date did Clic first release its financial report in 2025? On the day Clic first released its financial report in 2025, what were the respective returns over the past year for the two funds, Changxin S&P 100 Equal Weight Index (QDII) USD Share and Debon Xinxing Value Flexible Allocation Mixed A? Which fund had the higher return over the past year?", "reference_response": "Click 2025's first financial report was released on April 29, 2025, and it was the Q1 2025 report (single-quarter Q1 report). As of 2025-04-29, the past one-year return of Changxin S&P 100 Equal Weight Index (QDII) USD Share was 6.67%, and the past one-year return of Debang Xinxing Value Flexible Allocation Mixed A was 9.24%; Debang Xinxing Value Flexible Allocation Mixed A had the higher past one-year return.", "response_final_reference": "Debon Xinxing Value Flexible Allocation Mixed A has a higher return rate over the past year", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_7", "prompt": "On what date did Shanghai Construction Group first release its financial report in 2025? On the day that financial report was released, among the three funds—Southern CSI All Securities Connection C, ICBC Credit Suisse SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Connection C, and BOC International China Securities 500 ETF Connection A—which fund had a return of less than -5% over the past 1 month and a return of less than 0% over the past 3 months?", "reference_response": "Shanghai Construction Group first released a financial report in 2025 on April 30, 2025, and it was the Q1 2025 Report. Data as of April 30, 2025 show that ICBC Credit Suisse SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Feeder C had a return of -1.55% over the past 1 month and 5.60% over the past 3 months; BOC Securities CSI 500 ETF Feeder A had a return of -4.40% over the past 1 month and 0.72% over the past 3 months; Southern All-share Securities Feeder C had a return of -6.33% over the past 1 month and -4.50% over the past 3 months. Only Southern All-share Securities Feeder C simultaneously meets the conditions of having a return below -5% over the past 1 month and below 0% over the past 3 months.", "response_final_reference": "Southern CSI All Share Securities Feeder C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_8", "prompt": "On what date was Bio-Share's 2025 third-quarter single-quarter financial report released? On that date, among the three funds Puyin Xingrong Steady One Year (FOF) A, Bosera CSI A100 Index C, and China Universal Global Consumer Industry Mixed (QDII) A, which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past 3 months and more than 20% over the past 6 months?", "reference_response": "Bio-Pharm shares' financial report for the single third quarter of 2025 was released on October 28, 2025. As of October 28, 2025, Puyin Xingrong Steady One Year (FOF) A had a return of 1.56% over the past 3 months and 2.81% over the past 6 months; Boshi CSI A100 Index C had a return of 14.11% over the past 3 months and 24.67% over the past 6 months; E Fund Global Consumer Industry Mixed (QDII) A had a return of 0.89% over the past 3 months and 13.60% over the past 6 months. Only Boshi CSI A100 Index C simultaneously meets the conditions of a return exceeding 10% over the past 3 months and exceeding 20% over the past 6 months.", "response_final_reference": "Bosera CSI A100 Index C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L1_2hop_9", "prompt": "On 2024-10-17 and 2024-12-11, for CEIBS Forecast Pension 2035 (FOF) C, on which date was the return rate over the past 1 month higher? In the financial reporting quarter corresponding to the date with the higher 1-month return rate, which company had a higher net cash flow from operating activities, Zhongda Leader or Wencan Co., Ltd.?", "reference_response": "On 2024-10-17, the 1-month return of Zhongou Future-oriented Pension 2035 (FOF) C was 13.60% (rounded); on 2024-12-11, the 1-month return was -1.15%. Therefore, the 1-month return on 2024-10-17 was the highest, reaching 13.60%. In the financial reporting quarter corresponding to 2024-10-17 (2024 Q3 single-quarter report), Zhongdalide's net cash flow from operating activities was RMB 70,508,277.24, while Wencan Co., Ltd.'s net cash flow from operating activities was RMB -55,564,988.93; Zhongdalide's was higher.", "response_final_reference": "Zhongda Lide", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L1_2hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_1", "prompt": "Among the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in their corresponding single-quarter Q3 reports on October 16, 2024, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest CSI STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?", "reference_response": "In the Q3 single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongdalide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 0.3693 million yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials satisfies the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest CSI STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a past one-year return of 12.66% and a past three-month return of -9.01%; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) had a past one-year return of 2.69% and a past three-month return of 0.86%. Only Harvest CSI STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C satisfies the conditions of a past one-year return above 10% and a negative past three-month return.", "response_final_reference": "Harvest CSI STAR 50 and ChiNext 50 Index C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_10", "prompt": "Among Jinxiandai, *ST Yanshi, Xiangshan Co., and Chunzhong Technology, based on the cumulative Q3 quarterly reports released up to November 4, 2024, which company had monetary funds exceeding RMB 400 million and total current liabilities below RMB 500 million? For that company, what was the date of its last financial report released in 2025 as of 2025-12-10? On that date, what were the respective returns over the past 3 months for the two funds Huabao ChiNext Artificial Intelligence ETF Initiated Link A and Tianhong CSI 500 ETF Link A? Which fund had the higher return over the past 3 months?", "reference_response": "The cumulative Q3 quarterly reports corresponding to November 4, 2024 (with statistics as of September 30, 2024) show that: Jinxiandai had monetary funds of 0.56 billion yuan and total current liabilities of 1.09 billion yuan; *ST Yanshi had monetary funds of 0.24 billion yuan and total current liabilities of 13.09 billion yuan; Xiangshan Co., Ltd. had monetary funds of 9.28 billion yuan and total current liabilities of 39.02 billion yuan; Chunzhong Technology had monetary funds of 4.44 billion yuan and total current liabilities of 0.91 billion yuan. Only Chunzhong Technology simultaneously meets the conditions of monetary funds exceeding 0.4 billion yuan (0.44 billion yuan) and total current liabilities below 0.5 billion yuan (0.91 billion yuan). As of 2025-12-10, the last financial report released by Chunzhong Technology in 2025 was on October 30, 2025, and it was the 2025 Q3 single-quarter report. On October 30, 2025, the nearly 3-month return of HuaBao ChiNext Artificial Intelligence ETF Initiated Feeder A was 42.0%, while the nearly 3-month return of Tianhong CSI 500 ETF Feeder A was 16.47%; among them, HuaBao ChiNext Artificial Intelligence ETF Initiated Feeder A had the higher nearly 3-month return.", "response_final_reference": "Huabao ChiNext Artificial Intelligence ETF Initiated Feeder A has a higher return rate over the past 3 months", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_11", "prompt": "Among the five funds Nanfang Pension Target 2060 Five-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A, E Fund CSI 500 ETF Linked Initiated A, China Merchants CSI Semiconductor Industry ETF Initiated Linked A, ICBC Credit Suisse SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Linked C, and Harvest CSI A100 ETF Initiated Linked A, on 2025-01-24, which fund had a daily growth rate of adjusted unit NAV greater than 1% and a return over the past week exceeding 1.3%? For that fund, between the two dates 2024-06-28 and 2025-04-18, on which date was the return over the past 6 months higher? As of the latest corresponding quarterly report date up to that day, between Hunan Gold and Donghong Co., Ltd., which company had net cash flow from operating activities exceeding 100 million yuan and net cash flow from investing activities less than -70 million yuan?", "reference_response": "On January 24, 2025, the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV of Nanfang Pension Target 2060 Five-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A was 1.07%, and its return over the past week was 1.31505%; the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV of E Fund CSI 500 ETF Linked Initiated A was 1.13%, and its return over the past week was 1.112975%; the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV of China Merchants CSI Semiconductor Industry ETF Initiated Linked A was 0.52%, and its return over the past week was -1.238542%; the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV of ICBC Credit Suisse SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Linked C was 0.85%, and its return over the past week was 0.880189%; the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV of Harvest CSI A100 ETF Initiated Linked A was 0.77%, and its return over the past week was 0.475645%. Only Nanfang Pension Target 2060 Five-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A simultaneously meets the conditions that the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV is greater than 1% and the return over the past week exceeds 1.3%. For this fund, the return over the past 6 months was higher on April 18, 2025, reaching 1.0666%, while the return over the past 6 months on June 28, 2024 was -6.8413%, so the return rate was higher on April 18, 2025. As of April 18, 2025, the latest financial report was the single-quarter report for the first quarter of 2025. The net cash flow from operating activities of Hunan Gold was 226,823,273.61 yuan (exceeding 100 million yuan), and the net cash flow from investing activities was -71,678,620.52 yuan (less than -70 million yuan); the net cash flow from operating activities of Donghong Co., Ltd. was 118,711,176.86 yuan (exceeding 100 million yuan), but the net cash flow from investing activities was -7,824,081.96 yuan (greater than -70 million yuan). Therefore, only Hunan Gold simultaneously meets the conditions that the net cash flow from operating activities exceeds 100 million yuan and the net cash flow from investing activities is less than -70 million yuan.", "response_final_reference": "Hunan Gold", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_12", "prompt": "Among the four funds—Bank of Communications Schroder Selected Starlight FOF, Guotai CSI Communications ETF Link A, Southern Guozheng Transportation Industry ETF Initiated Link A, and CEIBS Yixiang Balanced Pension Target Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A—which fund had a return greater than 0% over the past week and a return greater than -1% over the past month on January 30, 2024, and when was it established? In the latest quarterly report available up to that time, which company had a higher net cash flow from operating activities, Tianci Materials or Bofei Electric?", "reference_response": "On January 30, 2024, only Southern CSI Transportation Industry ETF Feeder Initiated Link A met the conditions that its return over the past week was greater than 0% and its return over the past 1 month was greater than -1%. The fund was established on November 24, 2023. According to the single-quarter report for Q3 2023 as of November 24, 2023, Tianci Materials had net cash flow from operating activities of 756 million yuan, while Bofei Electric had 41.7044 million yuan; Tianci Materials had the higher net cash flow from operating activities.", "response_final_reference": "Tinci Materials has a higher net cash flow from operating activities", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_13", "prompt": "For Oriental Red Xinhe Balanced Two-Year Hybrid (FOF), between the two dates 2024-05-20 and 2025-08-25, on the day with the higher category-average three-month return rate, in the financial report corresponding to that day (the latest financial report as of that day), among the five companies Hongfa Technology, Shennan Circuits, Eastsoft Carrier, Fortior Technology, and Jincai Internet, which two companies had the highest net cash flow from operating activities? Of these two companies, in the single-quarter report for Q1 2025, which company had monetary funds exceeding RMB 2 billion and total current liabilities below RMB 6 billion?", "reference_response": "As of 2025-08-25, the peer-category average three-month return rate was higher (0.1388%). In the 2025 semiannual report (as of 2025-06-30), the two companies with the highest net cash flow from operating activities were Shennan Circuits and Hongfa Technology. In the 2025 Q1 single-quarter report (statistical cutoff date: 2025-03-31), only Hongfa Technology met the conditions of having monetary funds exceeding RMB 2 billion (RMB 3.752 billion) and total current liabilities below RMB 6 billion (RMB 5.146 billion).", "response_final_reference": "Hongfa Shares", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_14", "prompt": "Between Shengjing Micro and Zhongke Jincai, in the cumulative financial report quarter for Q3 2024 (statistics as of September 30, 2024), which company had a current ratio greater than 10 and an asset-liability ratio below 10%? For the company that meets the above conditions, as of December 10, 2025, on what dates did all block trades in 2025 occur? Among those block trade dates, for Huabao CSI Subdivided Chemical Industry Theme ETF Feeder A, which date had the No. 1 ranking in return over the past 6 months?", "reference_response": "Only Shengjingwei satisfies the conditions of having a current ratio greater than 10 (actual 11.24) and an asset-liability ratio below 10% (actual 7.98%); as of December 10, 2025, all of Shengjingwei's block trades in 2025 occurred on March 17, 2025 and September 1, 2025, respectively; for Huabao CSI Subdivided Chemical Industry Theme ETF Link A, the return over the past 6 months was 24.3843% on 2025-03-17 and 16.8464% on 2025-09-01, therefore the date ranked first is 2025-03-17.", "response_final_reference": "2025-03-17", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_15", "prompt": "On which of 2024-02-06, 2025-06-19, and 2025-07-28 did Shenzhen Huaqiang have a trading volume exceeding 8 million shares and a turnover rate below 1%? On that day, between the two funds Huabao CSI Subdivided Chemical Industry Theme ETF Link A and ChinaAMC Wenfu Six-Month Holding Hybrid C, which one had a higher return over the past 1 month? For the fund category of that fund, between 2024-04-11 and 2025-06-25, on which day was the average six-month return of its peer category higher?", "reference_response": "On 2024-02-06, Shenzhen Huaqiang had a trading volume of 9,205,500 shares (about 9.2055 million shares), with a turnover rate of 0.88%; on 2025-06-19, the trading volume was 13,179,300 shares (about 13.1793 million shares), with a turnover rate of 1.26%; on 2025-07-28, the trading volume was 20,681,600 shares (about 20.6816 million shares), with a turnover rate of 1.98%. Only 2024-02-06 meets the condition that trading volume exceeded 8 million shares and the turnover rate was below 1%. The data on 2024-02-06 show that the past 1-month return of Huabao CSI Subdivided Chemical Industry Theme ETF Feeder A was -7.826695%, and the past 1-month return of ChinaAMC Wenfu Six-Month Holding Mixed C was -0.588235%. Comparing by percentile ranking (the higher the return, the higher the rank), ChinaAMC Wenfu Six-Month Holding Mixed C (-0.588235%) is higher than Huabao CSI Subdivided Chemical Industry Theme ETF Feeder A (-7.826695%), so the fund ranked in the top 1 is ChinaAMC Wenfu Six-Month Holding Mixed C. This fund was lower on 2024-04-11 (average six-month return of the same category: 0.0019%) than on 2025-06-25 (average six-month return of the same category: 0.0187%), therefore 2025-06-25 performed better.", "response_final_reference": "2025-06-25", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_16", "prompt": "On what date did China Silver Group first release its financial report during the period from mid-2024 to 2025? On the day of that first financial report release, among the three funds GF Global Stable Allocation Hybrid (QDII) RMB A, HuaBao CSI Subdivided Chemical Industry Theme ETF Link A, and ChinaAMC Dingfu 3-Month Regular Open Bond A, which fund had a return rate of over 10% in the past week and a positive daily growth rate of adjusted unit NAV? When was that fund established?", "reference_response": "The first financial report released by China Silver Group during the period from mid-2024 to 2025 was on September 27, 2024, and it was the 2024 interim report. On September 27, 2024, GF Global Steady Allocation Mixed (QDII) RMB A had a return rate of -0.464881% over the past week, and its adjusted unit NAV daily growth rate was -0.27%; HuaBao CSI Subdivided Chemical Industry Thematic ETF Link A had a return rate of 15.173381% over the past week, and its adjusted unit NAV daily growth rate was 5.33%; ChinaAMC Dingfu 3-Month Regular Open Bond A had a return rate of -0.297991% over the past week, and its adjusted unit NAV daily growth rate was -0.34%. Only HuaBao CSI Subdivided Chemical Industry Thematic ETF Link A meets the condition of having a return rate of more than 10% over the past week and a positive adjusted unit NAV daily growth rate. The fund was established on June 24, 2021.", "response_final_reference": "June 24, 2021", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_17", "prompt": "For the two funds, Huaan CSI Securities Companies and Zhongtai Anyi Interest Rate Bond C, on 2024-09-25, which fund had a return of more than 5% over the past week and a return of more than 8% over the past 1 month? Among the dates 2024-04-10, 2024-08-29, and 2025-08-26, for the fund category to which the fund meeting the above conditions belongs, on which date was the average three-month return of the same category the highest? As of the latest financial report before the date with the highest return, which company had higher monetary funds, Baoxin Software or Xinhua Department Store?", "reference_response": "On 2024-09-25, Huaan CSI Securities Companies had a return rate of 8.869258% over the past week and 10.127487% over the past month; Zhongtai Anyi Interest Rate Bond Bond C had a return rate of 0.163919% over the past week and 1.109597% over the past month. Only Huaan CSI Securities Companies meets the conditions of having a return rate of more than 5% over the past week and more than 8% over the past month. The category average three-month return rate of Huaan CSI Securities Companies was 0.0262% on 2024-04-10, -0.0965% on 2024-08-29, and 0.2095% on 2025-08-26. Among these, the return rate on 2025-08-26 was the highest, reaching 0.2095%. In the semiannual reports as of 2025-08-26, Baoxin Software had monetary funds of 3.704 billion yuan (3,704,393,631.74 yuan), and Xinhua Department Store had monetary funds of 772 million yuan (772,165,300.73 yuan). Therefore, Baoxin Software had higher monetary funds.", "response_final_reference": "Baosight Software", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_18", "prompt": "Between the two funds, Yinhua Zunhe Pension 2030 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) and Guotai CSI Communications ETF Link C, which fund simultaneously satisfies being established earlier than 2019-09-01 and having the fund type Hybrid - Partial Bond? For that fund, on which of the two dates, 2024-09-25 and 2025-06-05, did the unit NAV exceed 1.0 and the return over the past month exceed 0.5%? In the single-quarter report for the period containing that date, among the five companies Tianci Materials, Shanghai Mechanical & Electrical, Tianfeng Securities, Tellhow Sci-Tech, and Jianfeng Group, which two companies had the highest net cash flow from operating activities?", "reference_response": "Yinhua Zunhe Pension 2030 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) was established on August 16, 2019, and its fund type is Hybrid - Partial Bond; Guotai CSI Communications ETF Link C was established on September 3, 2019, and its fund type is Index - Equity. Only Yinhua Zunhe Pension 2030 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) simultaneously satisfies the conditions of being established earlier than September 1, 2019 and having a fund type of Hybrid - Partial Bond; on 2025-06-05, the unit NAV of Yinhua Zunhe Pension 2030 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) was 1.0315 yuan (above 1.0), and the return for the past month was 0.8506% (above 0.5%), while on 2024-09-25 the unit NAV was 0.9683 yuan (below 1.0), and the return for the past month was -0.1238% (below 0.5%). Only 2025-06-05 simultaneously satisfies the conditions that the unit NAV exceeds 1.0 and the return for the past month exceeds 0.5%; in the corresponding Q2 quarterly report for 2025-06-05, the net cash flow from operating activities of Tianci Materials was 531,526,480.15 yuan, Shanghai Electromechanical was 609,568,114.26 yuan, Tianfeng Securities was 6,138,074,428.11 yuan, Tellhow Technology was -208,484,259.40 yuan, and Jianfeng Group was 90,061,020.16 yuan. The top two were Tianfeng Securities (highest quantile) and Shanghai Electromechanical (second-highest quantile).", "response_final_reference": "Tianfeng Securities and Shanghai Electric Mechanical", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_19", "prompt": "Among Jingquanhua, Huafeng Co., Ltd., and Shandong Hi-Speed Holdings, which company had the highest turnover rate on 2024-12-13? On what date was the Q3 2025 financial report of the company with the highest turnover rate released? On the date that financial report was released, among the categories to which the four funds Tianhong Pension 2035 Three-Year A, Jianxin Youxiang Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A, China Merchants CSI Dividend ETF Link A, and Yinhua Integrated Circuit Mixed C belong, which category ranked first by percentile of average one-year return within the same category?", "reference_response": "On 2024-12-13, Jingquanhua had a turnover rate of 2.67%, Huafeng Co., Ltd. had a turnover rate of 2.34%, and Shangao Holdings had a turnover rate of 0.11%; Jingquanhua had the highest turnover rate. Jingquanhua's financial report for the third quarter of 2025 was released on 2025-10-30. Data on 2025-10-30 showed that the peer-group average one-year return for Index-Equity Funds (to which China Merchants CSI Dividend ETF Link A belongs) was 0.2957%, the peer-group average one-year return for Hybrid-Bond-leaning Funds (to which Tianhong Pension 2035 Three-Year A belongs) was 0.0799%, the peer-group average one-year return for Hybrid-Flexible Funds (to which CCB Youxiang Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) A belongs) was 0.2487%, and the peer-group average one-year return for Hybrid-Equity-leaning Funds (to which Yinhua Integrated Circuit Hybrid C belongs) was 0.3260%. Ranked by the percentile of peer-group average one-year return (the higher, the better), Index-Equity Funds (0.2957%) ranked highest.", "response_final_reference": "Index Equity Fund", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_2", "prompt": "Among the four funds—Southern Xiaokang Industry ETF Link A, ChinaAMC CSI Robot ETF Initiated Link A, Invesco Great Wall Pension 2035 Three-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), and Guotai CSI Communications ETF Link C—which fund, on October 23, 2025, had a return of more than 50% over the past 3 months and more than 100% over the past 6 months? For that fund, what were the average one-year returns of its fund category peers at the two time points February 2, 2024 and September 2, 2024, respectively? At which time point was the return higher? In the corresponding single-quarter financial report for the day with the higher return, among the four companies Bolo Bao, Wentou Holdings, Hansong Technology, and Fuhuang Steel Structure, which two companies had the highest operating profit?", "reference_response": "As of October 23, 2025: China Southern Xiaokang Industry ETF Feeder A had a return of 2.81% over the past 3 months and 14.31% over the past 6 months; ChinaAMC CSI Robot ETF Initiated Feeder A had a return of 14.32% over the past 3 months and 19.55% over the past 6 months; Invesco Great Wall Pension 2035 Three-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 5.17% over the past 3 months and 13.78% over the past 6 months; Guotai CSI Communications ETF Feeder C had a return of 55.55% over the past 3 months and 111.19% over the past 6 months. Only Guotai CSI Communications ETF Feeder C satisfies both conditions of having a return of more than 50% over the past 3 months and more than 100% over the past 6 months; its fund category, index fund - equity fund, had an average one-year return for the same category of -0.2700% on February 2, 2024, and an average one-year return for the same category of -0.1707% on September 2, 2024, so the return on September 2, 2024 was higher. In the corresponding Q3 quarterly report for September 2, 2024, Bailingbao's operating profit was 38179514.18 yuan, Wentou Holdings' operating profit was -106744828.11 yuan, Hansun Technology's operating profit was 92686763.02 yuan, and Fuhuang Steel Structure's operating profit was 35427778.03 yuan. The top two were Hansun Technology and Bailingbao.", "response_final_reference": "Hansong Technology, Baolingbao", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_20", "prompt": "What is the release date of Dengyun Holdings' 2025 semiannual report? On that date, among the four funds—Nanfang Pension Target 2055 Five-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) Y, GF SZSE 100 ETF Link A, HuaBao CSI Interbank Certificate of Deposit AAA Index 7-Day Holding Period, and Nanfang CSI 500 ETF Link C—which two funds had the highest returns over the past 3 months? Based on their annual return rankings in 2024, how should those two funds be ordered from better to worse?", "reference_response": "Dengyun Co., Ltd.'s 2025 semiannual report was released on August 27, 2025. As of August 27, 2025, the top two funds by return over the past 3 months were Southern CSI 500 ETF Feeder C (21.539%) and GF SZSE 100 ETF Feeder A (20.853%). Based on the 2024 annual return ranking, GF SZSE 100 ETF Feeder A ranked 1415 (out of a total of 2974 funds in the same category), and Southern CSI 500 ETF Feeder C ranked 1868 (out of a total of 2974 funds in the same category). Therefore, GF SZSE 100 ETF Feeder A ranks ahead of Southern CSI 500 ETF Feeder C.", "response_final_reference": "GF Shenzhen 100 ETF Feeder A is better than Southern CSI 500 ETF Feeder C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_21", "prompt": "Among the four companies China Galaxy, Huafeng Co., Ltd., OmniVision Group, and Kingdomway, which company had the lowest turnover rate on 2025-06-18? For the company with the lowest turnover rate, between the single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-06-21 and the single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-09-13, on which date was cash inflow from operating activities higher? On the date with the higher cash inflow from operating activities, between the two funds China Merchants CSI Dividend ETF Link A and Pengyang CSI 500 Quality Growth Index A, which fund had a return over the past 6 months of more than 10% and a return over the past 1 year of less than 5%?", "reference_response": "On 2025-06-18, China Galaxy had a turnover rate of 0.54%, Huafeng Co., Ltd. had a turnover rate of 2.67%, OmniVision Group had a turnover rate of 0.61%, and Jindawei had a turnover rate of 0.97%. Therefore, China Galaxy had the lowest turnover rate. The cash inflow from operating activities in the single-quarter report for Q2 2024 corresponding to 2024-06-21 was RMB 2,038,604,791.67, and the cash inflow from operating activities in the single-quarter report for Q3 2024 corresponding to 2024-09-13 was RMB 152,810,931.78. Therefore, the reporting period corresponding to 2024-06-21 had the highest cash inflow from operating activities. On 2024-06-21, China Merchants CSI Dividend ETF Link A had a return of 10.46% over the past 6 months and 10.50% over the past 1 year; Pengyang CSI 500 Quality Growth Index A had a return of 11.74% over the past 6 months and 1.98% over the past 1 year. Only Pengyang CSI 500 Quality Growth Index A meets the condition that the return over the past 6 months exceeds 10% (actual: 11.74%) and the return over the past 1 year is below 5% (actual: 1.98%).", "response_final_reference": "Pengyang CSI 500 Quality Growth Index A", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_22", "prompt": "For Huaxia ChiNext Mid-Cap 200 ETF Initiated Feeder C, on which of the two dates, 2024-08-26 and 2025-05-06, was the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV higher? On the day when the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV was higher, among the three companies Suda Holdings, Hailu Heavy Industry, and Shanghai Electric Power, which company had a price change exceeding 5% and a turnover rate exceeding 10%? On what date was that company's 2023 annual report released?", "reference_response": "According to the fund NAV data, the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV on 2024-08-26 was 0.29%, and the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV on 2025-05-06 was 3.38%. Therefore, the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV was higher on 2025-05-06. On 2025-05-06, Suda Co., Ltd. had a price change of 0.05% and a turnover rate of 6.10%; Hailu Heavy Industry had a price change of 10.10% and a turnover rate of 12.15%; Shanghai Electric Power had a price change of 1.27% and a turnover rate of 1.49%. Only Hailu Heavy Industry meets the condition of having a price change exceeding 5% and a turnover rate exceeding 10%. Hailu Heavy Industry's 2023 annual report was released on March 20, 2024.", "response_final_reference": "March 20, 2024", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_23", "prompt": "For Dacheng CSI A500 ETF-Initiated Feeder E, on which of the two dates, 2025-04-29 and 2025-09-05, did the unit NAV exceed 1 yuan and the year-to-date return exceed 10%? On the date that satisfies both conditions of unit NAV exceeding 1 yuan and year-to-date return exceeding 10%, among the four companies Ganhua Sci-Tech, Huaan Securities, LB Group, and Everwin Precision, which two companies had the lowest turnover rates? For those two companies with the lowest turnover rates, among the four reporting periods of the single Q1 2024 report (2024-03-31), the 2024 interim report (2024-06-30), the cumulative Q3 2024 report (2024-09-30), and the 2024 annual report (2024-12-31), which two reporting periods ranked first and second respectively by average total shareholders' equity?", "reference_response": "2025-09-05 meets the conditions, because on 2025-04-29 the unit NAV was 0.9508 yuan (below 1 yuan) and the year-to-date return was -3.44% (not exceeding 10%); on 2025-09-05 the unit NAV was 1.146 yuan (above 1 yuan) and the year-to-date return was 16.38% (exceeding 10%). Therefore, only 2025-09-05 simultaneously satisfies the conditions that the unit NAV exceeds 1 yuan and the year-to-date return exceeds 10%; on 2025-09-05, Ganhua Sci-Tech Industry had a turnover rate of 2.45%, Huaan Securities had a turnover rate of 1.11%, LB Group had a turnover rate of 1.25%, and Everwin Precision had a turnover rate of 6.15%. Comparing by percentile, the two companies with the lowest turnover rates are Huaan Securities and LB Group (Huaan Securities has the smallest percentile, and LB Group the second smallest); for Huaan Securities and LB Group, among the four reporting periods of the Q1 2024 single-quarter report (2024-03-31), the 2024 semiannual report (2024-06-30), the cumulative Q3 2024 report (2024-09-30), and the 2024 annual report (2024-12-31), ranked by the average total shareholders' equity, the top two are the cumulative Q3 2024 report (average value 24312759490.645 yuan) and the 2024 annual report (average value 24157011256.25 yuan).", "response_final_reference": "The cumulative report for the third quarter of 2024 (average value: 24,312,759,490.645 yuan) and the 2024 annual report (average value: 24,157,011,256.25 yuan)", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_24", "prompt": "Among the five companies Huajian Group, Yulong Shares, Kuang-Chi Technologies, Longhua Technology, and Geer Software, which company had net profit attributable to the parent exceeding 100 million yuan and basic earnings per share above 0.1 yuan in its single-quarter report for Q1 2024? On what date was that company's Q2 2024 single-quarter report released? On that date, what were the respective one-year return rates of the two funds E Fund CSI Wind M&A Restructuring Index (LOF) and GF Ancheng Pension Target 2040 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A? Which fund had the higher one-year return rate?", "reference_response": "In the single-quarter report for Q1 2024, Huajian Group's net profit attributable to the parent company was 79,817,474.11 yuan, with basic earnings per share of 0.08 yuan; Yulong Shares' net profit attributable to the parent company was 105,620,578.39 yuan, with basic earnings per share of 0.14 yuan; Kuang-Chi Technologies' net profit attributable to the parent company was 135,830,457.33 yuan, with basic earnings per share of 0.06 yuan; Longhua Technology's net profit attributable to the parent company was 54,943,051.96 yuan, with basic earnings per share of 0.06 yuan; Geer Software's net profit attributable to the parent company was -51,501,037.28 yuan, with basic earnings per share of -0.22 yuan. Only Yulong Shares meets the conditions of net profit attributable to the parent company exceeding 100 million yuan (105,620,578.39 yuan > 100,000,000 yuan) and basic earnings per share being higher than 0.1 yuan (0.14 > 0.1). The release date of Yulong Shares' single-quarter report for Q2 2024 was August 30, 2024. On August 30, 2024, the past one-year return of E Fund CSI Wind M&A Restructuring Index (LOF) was -18.00%, and the past one-year return of GF Ancheng Pension Target 2040 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A was -5.08%; GF Ancheng Pension Target 2040 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A had the higher past one-year return.", "response_final_reference": "GF Ancheng Target Retirement 2040 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A has a higher return rate over the past year", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_25", "prompt": "On what date did Junhe Co., Ltd. first release its financial report in 2025? On that date, between the two funds China AMC Utilities ETF Connect A and Ping An CSI New Energy Vehicle ETF Initiated Connect C, which fund had the higher return over the past 3 months? How did that fund rank in returns among similar funds at the end of 2024?", "reference_response": "Junhe Co., Ltd. first released its 2025 financial report on April 25, 2025. On April 25, 2025, the nearly 3-month return of ChinaAMC Utilities ETF Link A was 3.93%, and the nearly 3-month return of Ping An CSI New Energy Vehicle ETF Initiated Link C was -0.9009%. Ranked No. 1 was ChinaAMC Utilities ETF Link A. At the end of 2024, ChinaAMC Utilities ETF Link A ranked 2286 among funds of the same category, with a total of 2974 comparable funds participating in the ranking. The average return of funds in the same category was 0.1001%, and the fund's return over the period was -0.0046%.", "response_final_reference": "ChinaAMC Utilities ETF Feeder A ranked 2286th among comparable funds by return at the end of 2024, out of a total of 2,974 comparable funds participating in the ranking. The average return of comparable funds was 0.1001%, and this fund's gain/loss over the period was -0.0046%.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_26", "prompt": "When was Fidelity Renyuan Steady 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A established? In the quarterly report corresponding to its establishment date, among the three companies Saili Medical, Shengjingwei, and Zhonghua Yantu, which company had the highest net cash flow from operating activities? For that company, among 2024-03-27, 2024-05-09, 2024-07-01, 2024-08-27, and 2025-09-29, which date ranked No. 1 by trading volume percentile?", "reference_response": "Fidelity Renyuan Steady Three-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A was established on January 15, 2025. In the Q1 quarterly report corresponding to January 15, 2025 (with statistics as of March 31, 2025), the net cash flow from operating activities for the three companies is as follows: Salubris Medical was -50,626,606.18 yuan, Shengjingwei was 10,526,476.36 yuan, and Sinochem Geotechnical was -76,640,202.58 yuan. Among them, Shengjingwei had the highest net cash flow from operating activities, reaching 10,526,476.36 yuan, indicating that its cash inflow from operating activities exceeded its outflow; while both Salubris Medical and Sinochem Geotechnical were negative, indicating net cash outflows from operating activities. On 2024-07-01, Shengjingwei's trading volume was 1,547,300 shares, the lowest among all dates (percentile rank: 1st). Specific data comparison: on 2024-03-27 the trading volume was 4,609,700 shares, on 2024-05-09 it was 2,261,800 shares, on 2024-07-01 it was 1,547,300 shares, on 2024-08-27 it was 1,741,900 shares, and on 2025-09-29 it was 1,707,000 shares. Ordered from smallest to largest, the trading volumes are: 2024-07-01 < 2025-09-29 < 2024-08-27 < 2024-05-09 < 2024-03-27.", "response_final_reference": "2024-07-01", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_27", "prompt": "When was Bank of Jiangsu's performance communication meeting on the adjustment of corporate loan interest rates in 2024 held? On that day, among the five companies Changjiang Investment, Hongbaoli, BeiGene-U, Huaqiang Technology, and Jinhaitong, which two companies had the highest trading volume? Of these two companies, which one had the highest turnover rate on April 26, 2024?", "reference_response": "The performance communication meeting on Jiangsu Bank's 2024 corporate loan interest rate adjustment was held on December 10, 2024. On 2024-12-10, Changjiang Investment had a trading volume of 25,477,500 shares, Hongbaoli had a trading volume of 61,668,100 shares, BeiGene-U had a trading volume of 2,163,450 shares, Huaqiang Technology had a trading volume of 1,365,793 shares, and Jinhaitong had a trading volume of 847,600 shares; the trading volume percentile ranking was: Hongbaoli (percentile 100%) > Changjiang Investment (percentile 80%) > BeiGene-U (percentile 60%) > Huaqiang Technology (percentile 40%) > Jinhaitong (percentile 20%), with the top two being Hongbaoli and Changjiang Investment. On April 26, 2024, Hongbaoli's turnover rate was 4.74%, Changjiang Investment's turnover rate was 2.39%, and Hongbaoli had the highest turnover rate.", "response_final_reference": "Hongbaoli has the highest turnover rate", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_28", "prompt": "Among the four funds—Huitianfu Xintianli 6-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A, China Merchants TMT50 ETF Feeder, Guotai Growth Preferred Hybrid, and Oriental Red Xinhe Balanced Two-Year Hybrid (FOF)—as of 2025-02-28, which fund had a return of more than 20% over the past 6 months and a year-to-date return greater than 0%? For the fund that meets these conditions, comparing its unit NAV on 2024-04-08 and 2025-05-12, on which date was it higher? As of the quarterly report date ending on that day for Zhongyou Capital, SPIC Industry-Finance, and Jingquanhua, which company had the most monetary funds?", "reference_response": "On 2025-02-28, China Universal Xintianli 6-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A had a return of 3.0649% over the past 6 months and a year-to-date return of 0.0189%; China Merchants TMT50 ETF Link had a return of 35.0704% over the past 6 months and a year-to-date return of 2.2952%; Guotai Growth Select Hybrid had a return of 15.6777% over the past 6 months and a year-to-date return of -3.0566%; Orient Hong Xinhe Balanced Two-Year Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 14.9631% over the past 6 months and a year-to-date return of 1.9203%. Only China Merchants TMT50 ETF Link meets both conditions of having a return of more than 20% over the past 6 months and a year-to-date return greater than 0%; according to fund performance data, the unit NAV was 1.5537 yuan on 2024-04-08 and 1.8022 yuan on 2025-05-12, with the unit NAV on 2025-05-12 being higher; for the quarterly report corresponding to 2025-05-12 (Q1 2025), the monetary funds of CPECC Capital were 34.416 billion yuan, those of SPIC Industry-Finance were 2.311 billion yuan, and those of Jingquanhua were 581 million yuan, among which CPECC Capital had the most monetary funds.", "response_final_reference": "CNPC Capital", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_29", "prompt": "Among the three dates 2024-07-01, 2024-11-15, and 2025-09-23 for Southern S&P China A-Share Large-Cap Dividend Low Volatility 50 ETF Feeder I, on which date was the average three-month return of its peer category the highest? In the corresponding quarterly report for that date, among the five companies Xincheng Holdings, Mankun Technology, Chuanheng Co., Ltd., Lomon Billions Group, and Conch Cement, which company had a positive net cash flow from operating activities and a negative net cash flow generated by financing activities? On what date was that company’s 2024 first-quarter financial report released?", "reference_response": "According to the data comparison: the peer average three-month return on 2024-07-01 was -0.0487%, on 2024-11-15 it was 0.2431%, and on 2025-09-23 it was 0.2324%. Among these, the peer average three-month return was highest on 2024-11-15, reaching 0.2431%., The single-quarter report for Q3 2024 (covering the period from July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024) shows:\n- Seazen Holdings: net cash flow from operating activities was -306,771,442 yuan (negative), and net cash flow from financing activities was -1,425,123,501 yuan (negative);\n- Mankun Technology: net cash flow from operating activities was 45,327,990.96 yuan (positive), and net cash flow from financing activities was 7,818,304.41 yuan (positive);\n- Chuanheng Co., Ltd.: net cash flow from operating activities was 290,119,874.18 yuan (positive), and net cash flow from financing activities was 24,610,679.31 yuan (positive);\n- Lomon Billions Group: net cash flow from operating activities was 1,221,496,814.65 yuan (positive), and net cash flow from financing activities was -1,104,858,743.31 yuan (negative);\n- Conch Cement: net cash flow from operating activities was 3,477,103,737 yuan (positive), and net cash flow from financing activities was 5,772,594,145 yuan (positive).\nAmong them, only Lomon Billions Group simultaneously meets the conditions of having positive net cash flow from operating activities (1.22 billion yuan) and negative net cash flow from financing activities (-11.05 billion yuan); Lomon Billions Group's Q1 2024 financial report was released on 2024-04-24", "response_final_reference": "April 24, 2024", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_3", "prompt": "On which of the two dates, 2024-10-30 and 2025-06-06, did the QDII-Equity Fund category to which Manulife India Equity (QDII) belongs have a one-month return greater than 0.05% and a three-month return less than 0.1%? In the financial reports corresponding to that date, among Hemei Group, Sanbo Brain, and Yihua Holdings, which company had a net sales margin exceeding 5% and a year-on-year growth rate in net profit attributable to the parent greater than 0%? When was that company listed?", "reference_response": "The data for 2024-10-30 show that the peer average one-month return was -0.0066% (below 0.05%), and the three-month return was 0.1427% (above 0.1%). The data for 2025-06-06 show that the peer average one-month return was 0.0547% (above 0.05%), and the three-month return was 0.0218% (below 0.1%). Therefore, only 2025-06-06 simultaneously satisfies the conditions that the one-month return exceeds 0.05% and the three-month return is below 0.1%. In the corresponding semiannual reports for that date, Herme Group had a net sales margin of -3.50%, and net profit attributable to the parent company increased by 53.93% year-on-year; Yihua Shares had a net sales margin of 5.68%, and net profit attributable to the parent company increased by -6.84% year-on-year; Sanbo Brain Science had a net sales margin of 8.63%, and net profit attributable to the parent company increased by 4.60% year-on-year. Only Sanbo Brain Science simultaneously satisfies the conditions that the net sales margin exceeds 5% and the year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company exceeds 0%. Sanbo Brain Science was listed on the A-share market on 2023-05-05.", "response_final_reference": "May 5, 2023", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_30", "prompt": "As of December 10, 2025, on what date did Hato Holdings first release a financial report in 2025? On the day that financial report was released, among the three funds Huabao CSI Intelligent Electric Vehicle ETF Feeder C, Tianhong CSI A500 ETF Feeder Y, and Zhongou Forecast Aggressive Pension Target Five-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) Y, which fund had a return over the past 1 month higher than -4% and a return over the past 3 months higher than -0.6%? For the fund category to which that fund belongs, what were the peer-category average one-year returns on the three dates 2024-01-05, 2025-02-05, and 2025-08-19, respectively? Which of those dates was the highest?", "reference_response": "Haitou Holdings first released financial reports in 2025 on April 25, 2025, publishing the Q1 2024 report and the 2024 annual report; on April 25, 2025, HuaBao CSI Intelligent Electric Vehicles ETF Link C had a return of -7.16% over the past 1 month and -0.26% over the past 3 months; Tianhong CSI A500 ETF Link Y had a return of -4.14% over the past 1 month and -1.17% over the past 3 months; ZhongOu Forward-Looking Active Pension Target Five-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) Y had a return of -3.74% over the past 1 month and -0.51% over the past 3 months, and only ZhongOu Forward-Looking Active Pension Target Five-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) Y simultaneously met the conditions of a past 1-month return greater than -4% and a past 3-month return greater than -0.6%; the average one-year return of its fund category among peers was -0.1432% on 2024-01-05, 0.1978% on 2025-02-05, and 0.3067% on 2025-08-19, among which the average one-year return of peers was highest on 2025-08-19, reaching 0.3067%.", "response_final_reference": "On 2025-08-19, the peer-category average one-year return rate was the highest, reaching 0.3067%.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_31", "prompt": "Among these four funds—500ETF Linked LOF, Zhongou Foresight Pension 2035 Three-Year Holding (FOF) Y, ChinaAMC Dingli Bond C, and E Fund Artificial Intelligence ETF Linked A—which fund had the lowest peer ranking percentile in 2024? For that fund, between 2024-04-24 and 2025-06-17, on which date was the nearly 1-year return rate higher? In the cumulative report for the quarter corresponding to that date, among the five companies Shenzhen Huaqiang, Saurer Intelligent, Hangyu Micro, Red Star Macalline, and Hongli Zhihui, which two companies had the highest total shareholders' equity indicator?", "reference_response": "In 2024, 500ETF Linked LOF had 2,974 peer funds, ranking 1,830th in return, with a percentile of 1830/2974≈61.53%; CEIBS Foresee Pension 2035 Three-Year Holding (FOF) Y had 5,052 peer funds, ranking 1,362nd in return, with a percentile of 1362/5052≈26.96%; ChinaAMC Dingli Bond C had 2,249 peer funds, ranking 372nd in return, with a percentile of 372/2249≈16.54%; E Fund Artificial Intelligence ETF Linked A had 2,974 peer funds, ranking 586th in return, with a percentile of 586/2974≈19.70%. The fund with the lowest percentile ranking was ChinaAMC Dingli Bond C (16.54%), indicating the best performance; for ChinaAMC Dingli Bond C, the past-1-year return on 2024-04-24 was -2.900082%, and the past-1-year return on 2025-06-17 was 6.680651928339%. Among the data for these two dates, the percentile of the past-1-year return on 2025-06-17 was 0% (ranked 1st), while the percentile on 2024-04-24 was 100% (ranked 2nd), therefore the past-1-year return on 2025-06-17 was the highest; the total shareholders' equity data corresponding to June 17, 2025 were: Shenzhen Huaqiang 7.861 billion yuan, Saurer Intelligent Technology 4.235 billion yuan, Hangyu Micro 1.712 billion yuan, Red Star Macalline 47.302 billion yuan, and Hongli Zhihui 2.590 billion yuan. Comparing by percentile: Red Star Macalline (0% percentile) ranked 1st, and Shenzhen Huaqiang (25% percentile) ranked 2nd, therefore the top two companies with the highest total shareholders' equity were Red Star Macalline and Shenzhen Huaqiang.", "response_final_reference": "Red Star Macalline and Shenzhen Huaqiang", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_32", "prompt": "Among the four companies RemeGen, LONGi Green Energy, Fuda Co., Ltd., and Yijiahe, in the corresponding single-quarter reports on 2024-01-25, which company had undistributed profits greater than 0 and monetary funds exceeding RMB 1 billion? For that company, among the single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-03-25, the single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-05-16, and the single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-09-20, on which date did the corresponding single-quarter report have the smallest loss in net profit attributable to the parent company?", "reference_response": "The financial data from the Q1 single-quarter reports corresponding to January 25, 2024 show: RemeGen had undistributed profits of -3.202 billion yuan and monetary funds of 623 million yuan; LONGi Green Energy had undistributed profits of 43.608 billion yuan and monetary funds of 57.314 billion yuan; Fuda Co., Ltd. had undistributed profits of 336 million yuan and monetary funds of 223 million yuan; Yijiahe had undistributed profits of 980 million yuan and monetary funds of 519 million yuan. Only LONGi Green Energy simultaneously meets the conditions of having undistributed profits greater than 0 and monetary funds exceeding 1 billion yuan. In the single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-03-25 (the single-quarter report for the first quarter of 2024), LONGi Green Energy's net profit attributable to the parent was -2350256332.45 yuan; in the single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-05-16 (the single-quarter report for the second quarter of 2024), the net profit attributable to the parent was -2880375190.53 yuan; in the single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-09-20 (the single-quarter report for the third quarter of 2024), the net profit attributable to the parent was -1254900583.07 yuan. Among these, the third-quarter single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-09-20 had the smallest absolute loss (1254900583.07 yuan), and therefore the smallest loss.", "response_final_reference": "the single-quarter report for Q3 corresponding to 2024-09-20", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_33", "prompt": "Among the four funds Yongying Xinxin Mixed C, Bosera Steady Preferred 3-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) C, China Merchants SSE Consumption 80 ETF Link C, and Bank of Communications CSI A500 Index C, on 2025-04-09, which two funds had the highest return over the past week? Among those two funds with the highest past-week return, which fund ranked in a more favorable percentile for rise/fall performance among its peer funds for the full year of 2024 (as of 2024-12-31)? For that fund, among the three time points 2024-01-04, 2024-10-08, and 2025-08-26, when did its return since inception first exceed 20%?", "reference_response": "On 2025-04-09, the one-week return of Yongying Xinxin Mixed C was -0.8316%, the one-week return of Bosera Steady Preferred Three-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) C was -2.3489%, the one-week return of China Merchants SSE Consumer 80 ETF Link C was -3.2290%, and the one-week return of BOCOM CSI A500 Index C was -5.5600%. Comparing by percentile (the higher the return, the smaller the percentile), the top two were Yongying Xinxin Mixed C (0% percentile) and Bosera Steady Preferred Three-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) C (33.3% percentile). According to the backfilled data updated on 2025-12-10: for the full year 2024 (as of 2024-12-31), Yongying Xinxin Mixed C ranked 46th by return change (out of 1810 funds in the same category), with a percentile of 46/1810≈2.54%; Bosera Steady Preferred Three-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) C ranked 1118th by return change, with a percentile of 1118/1810≈61.77%. A smaller percentile indicates a higher ranking, so Yongying Xinxin Mixed C's ranking percentile (2.54%) was higher. According to the query results: on 2024-01-04, the return since inception was 8.339619%, less than 20%; on 2024-10-08, the return since inception was 17.228747%, less than 20%; on 2025-08-26, the return since inception was 27.044499515138%, greater than 20%. Therefore, the first date on which the return since inception exceeded 20% was 2025-08-26.", "response_final_reference": "2025-08-26", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_34", "prompt": "When was Nanfang Haowen Preferred 9-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) C established? As of the quarterly financial report date for the single quarter ending on its establishment date, among Kehua Data, Donghong Co., Ltd., and Yonyou Network, which company had the highest net profit attributable to the parent company? For that company, in the cash flow statement for the 2024 Q2 reporting season, which was highest among cash inflows from operating activities, cash inflows from investing activities, and cash inflows from financing activities?", "reference_response": "Southern Haowen Preferred 9-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) C was established on May 6, 2023; in the first quarter of 2023, Kehua Data's net profit attributable to the parent was RMB 143,530,149.14, Donghong Co., Ltd.'s was RMB 47,937,059.87, and Yonyou Network's was RMB -396,803,755; by percentile comparison, the ranking of net profit attributable to the parent is: Kehua Data (100th percentile), Donghong Co., Ltd. (66.7th percentile), Yonyou Network (33.3rd percentile). Therefore, the company with the highest net profit attributable to the parent is Kehua Data. In the 2024 Q2 financial reporting season, the cash flow statement data of Kehua Data (code: 002335.SZ) shows: cash inflow from operating activities was RMB 1921021315.18, cash inflow from investing activities was RMB 215679424.21, and cash inflow from financing activities was RMB -49896.68 (indicating cash outflow). Cash inflow from operating activities was the highest, reaching RMB 1921021315.18.", "response_final_reference": "Cash inflows from operating activities were the highest, reaching RMB 1,921,021,315.18.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_35", "prompt": "On which date did Ping An CSI Photovoltaic Industry Index E have the higher 1-month return, 2025-07-31 or 2025-09-09? On the day with the higher 1-month return, among Inspur Information, Tongbao Energy, Hile Bio, Wanji Technology, and Hainan Huatie, which company had trading volume exceeding 50 million shares and turnover rate higher than 3.5%? For that company, among the quarterly financial reports ending on 2024-05-16, 2024-07-08, and 2024-11-25, which two reporting dates showed the best performance for net cash flow from operating activities per share?", "reference_response": "The 1-month return as of 2025-07-31 was 6.0%, and the 1-month return as of 2025-09-09 was 19.869205616465%; therefore, the 1-month return was highest on 2025-09-09. On 2025-09-09, Inspur Information had a trading volume of 47.404 million shares and a turnover rate of 3.22%; Tongbao Energy had a trading volume of 10.7172 million shares and a turnover rate of 0.93%; Hile Bio had a trading volume of 6.584 million shares and a turnover rate of 1.01%; Wanji Technology had a trading volume of 3.4797 million shares and a turnover rate of 2.53%; Hainan Huatie had a trading volume of 76.445 million shares and a turnover rate of 3.83%. Only Hainan Huatie simultaneously met the conditions of trading volume exceeding 50 million shares and turnover rate higher than 3.5%. The date 2024-05-16 corresponds to the net cash flow from operating activities per share in the single-quarter report for Q1 2024, which was RMB 0.34; 2024-07-08 corresponds to the net cash flow from operating activities per share in the 2024 interim report, which was RMB 0.58; 2024-11-25 corresponds to the net cash flow from operating activities per share in the cumulative third-quarter report for 2024, which was RMB 0.87. By percentile comparison (higher ranks first): 2024-11-25 (100th percentile) > 2024-07-08 (66.7th percentile) > 2024-05-16 (33.3rd percentile), and the two best-performing dates were 2024-11-25 and 2024-07-08.", "response_final_reference": "2024-11-25 and 2024-07-08", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_36", "prompt": "Among the three stocks Runze Technology, Lingyun Co., Ltd., and CanSino Biologics, which stock had the highest turnover rate on July 16, 2025? For that company, as of December 10, 2025, what are the release dates of all financial reports published in 2025? At those three financial report release dates, among the three funds Nanfang Fuyu Stable Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A, Pengyang Stable Preferred One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A, and Pengyang CSI 500 Quality Growth Index C, which funds showed a continuously increasing trend in unit net value?", "reference_response": "On July 16, 2025, Runze Technology had a turnover rate of 9.86%, Lingyun Co., Ltd. had a turnover rate of 3.15%, and CanSino had a turnover rate of 1.40%. Runze Technology had the highest turnover rate. As of December 10, 2025, Runze Technology had released a total of 3 financial reports in 2025: the Q1 single-quarter report released on April 29, 2025, the semiannual report released on August 29, 2025, and the Q3 cumulative quarterly report released on October 30, 2025. Nanfang Fuyu Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) A (2025-04-29: 1.0062 yuan → 2025-08-29: 1.0622 yuan → 2025-10-30: 1.0849 yuan), Pengyang Steady Preferred One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) A (2025-04-29: 0.9679 yuan → 2025-08-29: 1.013 yuan → 2025-10-30: 1.0259 yuan), and Pengyang CSI 500 Quality Growth Index C (2025-04-29: 1.5866 yuan → 2025-08-29: 1.9332 yuan → 2025-10-30: 2.0346 yuan). The unit net values of all three funds showed a continuous upward trend across the three time points, among which Pengyang CSI 500 Quality Growth Index C had the largest increase (cumulative growth of 28.2%), while Nanfang Fuyu Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) A showed the most stable increase (positive growth in each stage).", "response_final_reference": "The unit net values of all three funds show a continuous upward trend across the three time points", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_37", "prompt": "On 2025-09-03, between Xinjv Network and Black Sesame Intelligent, which stock had a trading volume of more than 3 million shares and a turnover rate of less than 1%? On what date was that company's 2024 annual report released? On that date, between the two funds, Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link A and BOCOM Schroders Select Starlight Mixed (FOF-LOF) A, which fund had both its return over the past 3 months and its return over the past 6 months greater than 0%?", "reference_response": "On 2025-09-03, Xinjv Network had a trading volume of 2,676,800 shares, with a turnover rate of 1.65%; Black Sesame Intelligence had a trading volume of 6,286,025 shares, with a turnover rate of 0.99%. Only Black Sesame Intelligence meets the condition of trading volume exceeding 3 million shares and turnover rate below 1%. Black Sesame Intelligence's 2024 annual report was released on 2025-04-25. On 2025-04-25, Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link A had a return of 1.71% over the past 3 months and 1.94% over the past 6 months; BOCOM Schroder Smart Selection Starlight Mixed (FOF-LOF) A had a return of -1.96% over the past 3 months and -2.50% over the past 6 months. Only Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link A meets the condition that both the past 3-month return and the past 6-month return exceed 0%.", "response_final_reference": "Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Feeder A", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_38", "prompt": "Among the three companies Zhongman Petroleum, Wanji Technology, and Xinghua New Materials, in their corresponding Q3 cumulative quarterly reports on 2024-09-24, which two companies had the highest monetary funds? For these two companies, based on the average performance of trading volume quantiles on the three days 2025-07-31, 2025-08-01, and 2025-08-06, which two days ranked in the top two, respectively? Between these two days, on which day did China AMC Fuyuan Pension Target 2045 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) have a higher daily growth rate of adjusted unit NAV?", "reference_response": "In the Q3 cumulative quarterly report corresponding to September 24, 2024, Zhongman Petroleum had monetary funds of 2300284214.19 yuan, Wanji Technology had monetary funds of 160049501.64 yuan, and Xinghua New Materials had monetary funds of 1147940642.03 yuan; by quantile comparison (from high to low), the top two are Zhongman Petroleum and Xinghua New Materials. 2025-07-31 (Zhongman Petroleum 17,905,800 shares / Xinghua New Materials 3,956,000 shares), 2025-08-01 (Zhongman Petroleum 10,273,800 shares / Xinghua New Materials 2,245,600 shares), 2025-08-06 (Zhongman Petroleum 8,103,400 shares / Xinghua New Materials 4,325,700 shares). Ranking by the mean of trading volume quantiles (higher ranks first): 2025-07-31 average 10,930,900 shares (ranked 1st), 2025-08-01 average 6,259,700 shares (ranked 2nd), 2025-08-06 average 6,214,550 shares (ranked 3rd). Therefore, the first two days are 2025-07-31 and 2025-08-01; on 2025-07-31, the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV was -0.91%, and on 2025-08-01, the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV was 0.01%. Ranking by growth rate from high to low (higher ranks first), the growth rate on 2025-08-01 is higher.", "response_final_reference": "2025-08-01", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_39", "prompt": "Among SF Holding, Kingteller, and Baotou Steel, in the corresponding Q3 cumulative quarterly reports on September 11, 2025, which two companies rank in the top two in net sales margin? Among these two companies, which company had a positive net cash flow from operating activities and a net cash flow from investing activities of less than -100 million yuan in the single-quarter Q2 report for 2025? When was that company listed?", "reference_response": "In the cumulative Q3 quarterly report corresponding to September 11, 2025: SF Holding's net sales margin was 3.87%, Yuyin Co., Ltd.'s net sales margin was 26.30%, and Baogang Co., Ltd.'s net sales margin was 0.50%. Comparing by quantiles (the higher the value, the higher the ranking): Yuyin Co., Ltd. ranked in the 1st quantile (highest), SF Holding ranked in the 2nd quantile, and Baogang Co., Ltd. ranked in the 3rd quantile. Therefore, the top two companies with the highest net sales margin are Yuyin Co., Ltd. and SF Holding. In the single-quarter Q2 report for 2025, Yuyin Co., Ltd.'s net cash flow from operating activities was RMB 12,827,871.33 (positive), and the net cash flow from investing activities was RMB 14,385,806.49 (positive); SF Holding's net cash flow from operating activities was RMB 8,874,877,000 (positive), and the net cash flow from investing activities was RMB -10,136,765,000 (less than negative RMB 100 million). Only SF Holding meets the condition that net cash flow from operating activities is positive and net cash flow from investing activities is less than negative RMB 100 million; SF Holding was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange on February 5, 2010.", "response_final_reference": "February 5, 2010", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_4", "prompt": "On what date did Jingjin Equipment release its financial report for the second time in 2024? On that date, among the three funds Southern CSI 300 ETF Feeder I, China Merchants Hexiang Balanced Pension Three-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) Y, and ChinaAMC Pension 2040 Three-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) Y, which fund had a return over the past week greater than -0.5% and a return since inception greater than -3%? When was that fund established?", "reference_response": "The second time Jingjin Equipment released a financial report in 2024 was on August 27, 2024, and it released its 2024 interim report. As of August 27, 2024, Nanfang CSI 300 ETF Link I had a return of -0.795624% over the past week and a return of -5.434354% since inception; China Merchants HeXiang Balanced Pension Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) Y had a return of -0.401524% over the past week and a return of -2.292698% since inception; ChinaAMC Pension 2040 Three-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) Y had a return of -0.897532% over the past week and a return of -24.376344% since inception. Among them, only China Merchants HeXiang Balanced Pension Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) Y meets the conditions of a past-week return greater than -0.5% and a since-inception return greater than -3%, and this fund was established on September 15, 2023.", "response_final_reference": "September 15, 2023", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_5", "prompt": "Among Huadian New Energy, Jinpan Technology, and Lomon Billions Group, based on their 2024 annual reports, which company simultaneously satisfies that the year-on-year growth in net profit attributable to the parent exceeds 10% and the net sales margin exceeds 8%? For the company or companies that meet the criteria, as of 2025-12-10 in 2025, on what date was the most recent financial report released? On that date, among the three funds Huabao CSI Intelligent Manufacturing Theme ETF, Yongying CSI 300 A, and ICBC Cash Money Market A, which fund's category had the highest average one-year return among comparable funds?", "reference_response": "According to the 2024 annual report data: Huadian Xinneng's net profit attributable to the parent company increased year-on-year by -8.20%, with a net sales margin of 27.91%; Jinpan Technology's net profit attributable to the parent company increased year-on-year by 13.82%, with a net sales margin of 8.27%; Longbai Group's net profit attributable to the parent company increased year-on-year by -32.79%, with a net sales margin of 8.14%. Only Jinpan Technology simultaneously meets the conditions of year-on-year growth in net profit attributable to the parent company exceeding 10% and net sales margin exceeding 8%. As of 2025-12-10 in 2025, Jinpan Technology's most recent financial report release was on 2025-10-28, and it released the 2025 third quarterly report (cumulative quarterly report). On 2025-10-28, the average one-year return of peers in the index-stock fund category to which Huabao CSI Intelligent Manufacturing Theme ETF belongs was 0.2688%; the average one-year return of peers in the index-stock enhanced fund category to which Yongying CSI 300 A belongs was 0.3048%; the average one-year return of peers in the money market fund category to which ICBC Cash Money A belongs was 0.0004%. Therefore, the peer average one-year return of the category to which Yongying CSI 300 A belongs was the highest.", "response_final_reference": "Among peers in the same category as Yongying CSI 300 A, the average one-year return is the highest.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_6", "prompt": "Among these five funds—Nanfang Fuyu Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A, Nanfang Haoyi Aggressive Jushen 3-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) C, Ping An CSI Artificial Intelligence Theme ETF Feeder A, Changxin S&P 100 Equal Weight Index (QDII) USD Share, and Changsheng Electronic Information Theme Mixed—which are the three funds with the earliest inception dates? Among these three funds, as of year-end 2023 (2023-12-31), which fund ranked in the top 50% of its category by return and had a rate of increase/decrease exceeding the category's average return? For that fund, on which date did it have the highest nearly 3-month return rate: 2024-10-23 or 2024-11-20?", "reference_response": "The inception dates of each fund are as follows: Southern Fuyu Stable Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A: September 29, 2021; Southern Haoyi Aggressive Jushen 3-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) C: April 26, 2022; Ping An CSI Artificial Intelligence Theme ETF Initiated Link A: April 29, 2025; Changxin S&P 100 Equal Weight Index (QDII) USD Share: July 1, 2021; Changsheng Electronic Information Theme Mixed: May 10, 2013. The three funds with the earliest inception dates are Changsheng Electronic Information Theme Mixed, Changxin S&P 100 Equal Weight Index (QDII) USD Share, and Southern Fuyu Stable Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A. Data as of 2023-12-31 show: Changsheng Electronic Information Theme Mixed had a return ranking of 1662/2218, price change of -0.1562%, and category average return of -0.0842%; Changxin S&P 100 Equal Weight Index (QDII) USD Share had a return ranking of 117/345, price change of 0.1159%, and category average return of 0.0916%; Southern Fuyu Stable Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A had a return ranking of 1215/1806, price change of -0.0179%, and category average return of -0.0091%. Only Changxin S&P 100 Equal Weight Index (QDII) USD Share satisfies both conditions: its return ranking of 117 is within the top 50% of its category (top 172.5), and its price change of 0.1159% exceeds the category average return of 0.0916%; the nearly 3-month return rate on 2024-10-23 was 5.69395%, and the nearly 3-month return rate on 2024-11-20 was 5.263158%; by quantile comparison, the return rate on 2024-10-23 was the highest (quantile 0%), followed by 2024-11-20 (quantile 100%).", "response_final_reference": "2024-10-23", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_7", "prompt": "For the Hybrid-Flexible Fund category, on which of the two dates, 2024-08-19 and 2025-07-10, were both the category average 3-month return greater than 0% and the category average 6-month return greater than 0%? Between Sany Heavy Industry and Goodix Technology, which company had the higher operating profit in the latest single-quarter financial report available as of that date? For that company, in the interim report available as of 2024-06-28 and the cumulative Q3 quarterly report available as of 2024-11-28, when did the year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company first exceed 10%?", "reference_response": "On 2025-07-10, for hybrid-flexible funds, the category average three-month return was 0.0765% and the category average six-month return was 0.0921%, both greater than 0%; whereas on 2024-08-19, the category average three-month return was -0.0859% and the category average six-month return was -0.0128%, both less than 0%. Therefore, only 2025-07-10 meets the condition that the category average three-month return is greater than 0% and the category average six-month return is greater than 0%. As of 2025 July 10, Sany Heavy Industry's Q2 single-quarter report operating profit was RMB 3,204,386,000, and Goodix Technology's Q2 single-quarter report operating profit was RMB 275,304,203.72; therefore, Sany Heavy Industry had the highest operating profit. In the financial reporting quarter (interim report) as of 2024-06-28, Sany Heavy Industry's year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent was 4.80%; in the financial reporting quarter (Q3 cumulative quarterly report) as of 2024-11-28, the year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent was 19.66%. Therefore, it was in the 2024 Q3 cumulative quarterly report quarter that the year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent exceeded 10% for the first time.", "response_final_reference": "Cumulative quarterly report for Q3 2024", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_8", "prompt": "On which of the two dates, 2025-04-23 and 2025-10-10, did ChinaAMC CSI Robot ETF Initiated Connect A have a return over the past 1 month below 0% and a return over the past 3 months below 10%? As of the latest quarterly financial report date prior to that day, among the four companies Tianfeng Securities, CanSino, Postal Savings Bank of China, and Chuan Ning Biology, which two companies had the highest net profit margin on sales? Of these two companies, which one had the higher turnover rate on 2024-11-07?", "reference_response": "On 2025-04-23, the past 1-month return of ChinaAMC CSI Robot ETF Initiated Feeder A was -10.83%, below 0%; the past 3-month return was 1.36%, below 10%. On 2025-10-10, the past 1-month return was 5.21%, above 0%; the past 3-month return was 28.00%, above 10%. Therefore, only 2025-04-23 simultaneously meets the conditions that the past 1-month return is below 0% and the past 3-month return is below 10%. In the 2025 Q1 single-quarter report (corresponding query date 2025-04-23), Postal Savings Bank of China had a net sales margin of 28.25%, Sichuan Ning Bio had a net sales margin of 22.22%, Tianfeng Securities had a net sales margin of 3.81%, and CanSino had a net sales margin of -8.42%. The top two with the highest indicator were Postal Savings Bank of China and Sichuan Ning Bio. On 2024-11-07, Postal Savings Bank of China's turnover rate was 0.23%, Sichuan Ning Bio's turnover rate was 11.21%, and Sichuan Ning Bio had the highest turnover rate.", "response_final_reference": "Kawning Bio has the highest turnover rate", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_3hop_9", "prompt": "For the two funds, Penghua Yicheng Active 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A and Wanjia Zhenxuan Hybrid A, among their corresponding fund categories, which category had the highest average three-month return on 2024-07-29? For the fund whose category had the highest average three-month return, in which year, 2023 or 2024, did it rank higher in returns among its peers (a smaller ranking value means a higher rank)? In the annual report for the year in which it ranked higher in returns, among Founder Motor, Dongfang Zhizao, and Xingxin New Material, which company had the highest year-on-year growth rate in net profit attributable to the parent company?", "reference_response": "On 2024-07-29, the three-month average return of the Hybrid-Flexible fund category corresponding to Penghua Yicheng Active 3-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) A was -0.0653%, and the three-month average return of the Hybrid-Equity-Biased fund category corresponding to Wanjia Zhenxuan Mixed A was -0.0834%. Therefore, the fund category corresponding to Penghua Yicheng Active 3-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) A had the highest three-month average return. According to the fund return ranking data: at the end of 2023, Penghua Yicheng Active 3-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) A ranked 373rd in returns (out of 4579 funds in the same category), and at the end of 2024, it ranked 507th in returns (out of 5052 funds in the same category). A smaller ranking number indicates better performance, so the 2023 return ranking was better. In the annual financial report corresponding to 2023, which had the better return ranking, the year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company was 143.29% for Founder Motor, -59.09% for Oriental Smart Manufacturing, and -32.23% for Xingxin New Materials. The highest year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company was for Founder Motor, with a corresponding value of 143.29%.", "response_final_reference": "Founder Motor", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_3hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_1", "prompt": "When was Dongfanghong Xinhe Steady 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A established? On the date of its establishment, among the three companies Chongqing Department Store, Tibet Rhodiola Pharmaceutical, and Defu Technology, which company had a turnover rate below 1% and a price change exceeding 1%? For the company that meets the condition, on what date was its first financial report released in 2025? (As of 2025-12-11) On the date that financial report was released, what were the respective returns over the past week for the four funds Tianhong CSI 500 ETF Link A, Fullgoal CSI Pharmaceutical 50 ETF Link C, Ping An CSI Auto Parts Theme ETF Link C, and ChinaAMC Fuze Pension Target 2035 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A? Which fund had the highest return over the past week?", "reference_response": "Orient Hong Xinhe Steady 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A was established on September 19, 2024. On September 19, 2024, Chongqing Department Store had a turnover rate of 2.11% and a price change of 4.27%; Tibet Rhodiola Pharmaceutical had a turnover rate of 0.72% and a price change of 1.07%; Defu Technology had a turnover rate of 7.25% and a price change of -0.08%. Only Tibet Rhodiola Pharmaceutical meets the condition of having a turnover rate below 1% and a price change exceeding 1%. The first time Tibet Rhodiola Pharmaceutical released a financial report in 2025 was on April 29, 2025, and it released the single-quarter report for the first quarter of 2025. ; On 2025-04-29, the return over the past week for Tianhong CSI 500 ETF Link A was -0.32%, for Fullgoal CSI Pharmaceutical 50 ETF Link C was -0.63%, for Ping An CSI Auto Parts Thematic ETF Link C was 2.98%, and for ChinaAMC Fuze Pension Target 2035 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A was 0.97%; the highest return over the past week was for Ping An CSI Auto Parts Thematic ETF Link C, with a corresponding value of approximately 2.98%.", "response_final_reference": "Tianhong CSI 500 ETF Feeder A had a return of -0.32% over the past week, Fullgoal CSI Pharmaceutical 50 ETF Feeder C had -0.63%, Ping An CSI Auto Parts Theme ETF Feeder C had 2.98%, and ChinaAMC Fuze Pension Target 2035 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A had 0.97%; the highest return over the past week was Ping An CSI Auto Parts Theme ETF Feeder C, with a corresponding indicator value of approximately 2.98%", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_10", "prompt": "On what date was Guoan Da's 2024 annual report released? On that date, among the three funds CCB Pension Enjoyment Steady One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A, Yinhua Zunyi Steady Pension One-Year Holding Mixed Initiated (FOF), and Fullgoal CSI Value ETF Link C, which fund had a return of greater than -1% over the past 1 month and greater than 0% over the past 3 months? When was that fund established? In the quarterly report for the quarter corresponding to the date on which that fund was established, among the four companies Chifeng Gold, Jiugui Liquor, Haixin Foods, and Zhengye Technology, which company had the highest monetary funds?", "reference_response": "Guoan Security's 2024 annual report was released on April 21, 2025. On that day, CCB Pension Preferred Steady One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) A had a return of -2.104% over the past month and -1.387% over the past three months; Yinhua Zunyi Steady Pension One-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) had a return of -0.594% over the past month and 0.021% over the past three months; Fullgoal CSI Value ETF Link C had a return of -4.490% over the past month and -3.144% over the past three months. Only Yinhua Zunyi Steady Pension One-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) simultaneously satisfies the conditions of a return greater than -1% over the past month and greater than 0% over the past three months, and this fund was established on January 04, 2022. The Q1 quarterly report data corresponding to January 04, 2022 show that Chifeng Gold had monetary funds of 829,710,537.4 yuan, Jiugui Liquor had monetary funds of 3,336,417,204.98 yuan, Haixin Foods had monetary funds of 205,033,192.39 yuan, and Zhengye Technology had monetary funds of 86,240,730.47 yuan. Among them, Jiugui Liquor's monetary funds were 3.336 billion yuan, significantly higher than the other three companies, making it the company with the highest monetary funds among the four.", "response_final_reference": "Jiugui Liquor", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_11", "prompt": "For Pengyang Steady Preferred One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) C, among the three dates 2024-03-18, 2024-12-27, and 2025-02-18, on which date was the nearly 1-year return rate the highest? On the day when the nearly 1-year return rate was the highest, between International Industry and ICBC, which stock had a turnover rate exceeding 2% and a negative single-day price change? On that day, when was the first financial report released in the corresponding year for that stock? For the two funds Ping An CSI A50 ETF Link C and Harvest CSI STAR & ChiNext 50 ETF Initiated Link I, in the year corresponding to that day, which fund had a better return ranking (smaller ranking value) and a interval price change that exceeded the average return of similar funds?", "reference_response": "On 2025-02-18, the return over the past year was 6.928%; on 2024-12-27 it was 3.481%; and on 2024-03-18 it was -7.486%. Therefore, the return over the past year was highest on 2025-02-18. On 2025-02-18, International Industry had a turnover rate of 2.51% and a single-day price change of -3.16%; ICBC had a turnover rate of 0.15% and a single-day price change of 1.91%. Only International Industry simultaneously meets the conditions of a turnover rate exceeding 2% and a negative single-day price change. The first time International Industry released a financial report in 2024 was on April 29, 2024, and it released the 2024 first quarter report. According to the 2024 annual data: Ping An CSI A50 ETF Link C ranked 1349th in return (out of 2974 comparable funds participating in the ranking), with an interval price change of 0.1265%; Harvest CSI STAR and ChiNext 50 ETF Initiated Link I ranked 625th in return, with an interval price change of 0.1997%; the average return of comparable funds was 0.1001%. Harvest CSI STAR and ChiNext 50 ETF Initiated Link I ranks higher (625 < 1349) and its interval price change 0.1997% > 0.1001%, so it meets the conditions; while Ping An CSI A50 ETF Link C, although its price change exceeds the average (0.1265% > 0.1001%), its rank of 1349 does not satisfy the requirement of being higher. Therefore, the only fund that meets the conditions is Harvest CSI STAR and ChiNext 50 ETF Initiated Link I.", "response_final_reference": "Harvest CSI STAR & ChiNext 50 ETF Initiating Connecting Fund I", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_12", "prompt": "For Southern Bank Feeder A, among the three dates 2025-02-20, 2025-04-18, and 2025-06-30, on which two dates was the category average 3-month return the highest? Among those two dates with the highest category average 3-month return, on which date did Antong Holdings, in the financial report for the corresponding quarter, have net cash flow per share from operating activities exceeding 0.2 yuan and net sales margin below 11.8%? On that date, between the two funds GF Optional Consumption Feeder C and Southern ChiNext ETF Feeder A, which fund had a return over the past 3 months greater than 0% and a year-to-date return greater than 1%? For that fund, between the two trading days 2025-02-19 and 2025-03-10, on which day was the past 1-month return higher?", "reference_response": "On 2025-02-20, 2025-04-18, and 2025-06-30, for Nanfang Bank Link A, the two dates with the highest average 3-month return among peers were 2025-06-30 and 2025-02-20 (by percentile comparison, the smaller the percentile, the higher the ranking: the percentile on 2025-06-30 was 0.1667, and on 2025-02-20 it was 0.5). Among those two dates with the highest average 3-month return among peers, in Antong Holdings' financial report corresponding to 2025-06-30 (semiannual report), the net cash flow from operating activities per share was RMB 0.29 (greater than RMB 0.2), and the net profit margin on sales was 11.68% (lower than 11.8%); in the financial report corresponding to 2025-02-20 (the single-quarter report for Q1 2025, with the statistical cutoff date of 2025-03-31), the net cash flow from operating activities per share was RMB 0.11 (not greater than RMB 0.2), and the net profit margin on sales was 11.82% (not lower than 11.8%). Therefore, only 2025-06-30 satisfies the conditions that the net cash flow from operating activities per share exceeds RMB 0.2 and the net profit margin on sales is below 11.8%. On 2025-06-30, GF Optional Consumer Link C had a return over the past 3 months of -4.62% and a return since the beginning of the year of 0.31%; Nanfang ChiNext ETF Link A had a return over the past 3 months of 2.16% and a return since the beginning of the year of 1.69%. Only Nanfang ChiNext ETF Link A satisfies the conditions that the return over the past 3 months exceeds 0% and the return since the beginning of the year exceeds 1%. The 1-month return on 2025-02-19 was 7.43%, higher than the 0.68% on 2025-03-10, so the 1-month return on 2025-02-19 was higher.", "response_final_reference": "February 19, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_13", "prompt": "For China Merchants Dual Bond Enhanced Bond E, at which time point did it have the lowest peer fund ranking percentile among its return rankings at the end of 2023 and at the end of the first quarter of 2025? In the annual report corresponding to the day with the lowest ranking percentile, among the three companies China Mobile, JHEBIO, and Raynen Technology, which company had the highest R&D expenses? On what date was that company's 2023 annual report released? On that date, between the two funds Huatai-PineBridge CSI 2000 Index Enhanced C and Orient New Energy Vehicle Theme Mixed, which fund had the higher return over the past 3 months?", "reference_response": "At the end of 2023, the return ranking percentile of China Merchants Dual Bond Enhanced Bond E was 9.06%, the lowest; in the annual reports corresponding to December 31, 2023, China Mobile had R&D expenses of 28.711 billion yuan, Jinh Bio had R&D expenses of 74.003 million yuan, and Ruineng Technology had R&D expenses of 112 million yuan, with China Mobile having the highest R&D expenses; China Mobile's 2023 annual report was released on March 21, 2025; on March 21, 2025, Huatai-PineBridge CSI 2000 Index Enhanced C had a past 3-month return of 6.825%, and Oriental New Energy Vehicle Theme Mixed had a past 3-month return of 5.436%, therefore Huatai-PineBridge CSI 2000 Index Enhanced C had the highest past 3-month return.", "response_final_reference": "Huatai-PineBridge CSI 2000 Index Enhanced C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_14", "prompt": "On 2024-07-12, 2024-08-20, and 2025-05-16, which date had the highest 3-month return for Bosera SSE Natural Resources ETF Link C? In the single-quarter report fiscal quarter corresponding to the date with the highest 3-month return, among Future Data Group, Dongwang Times, and Baiya Co., Ltd., which two companies ranked in the top two by net cash flow from operating activities from highest to lowest? Of those two companies, on 2025-11-20, which company had a turnover rate below 1% and trading volume below 5 million shares? On what date was that company's 2025 third-quarter report released?", "reference_response": "2025-05-16 had the highest return over the past 3 months. Specifically: the return over the past 3 months on 2024-07-12 was -4.172912%; the return over the past 3 months on 2024-08-20 was -12.231893%; and the return over the past 3 months on 2025-05-16 was -0.338181%. The financial reporting quarter corresponding to May 16, 2025 was the single-quarter report for Q2 2025 (with statistical cutoff date June 30, 2025). Ranked by net cash flow from operating activities from high to low: 1st, Baiya Co., Ltd. (60,770,718 yuan); 2nd, Dongwang Times (25,723,304.47 yuan). On 2025-11-20, Baiya Co., Ltd. had a turnover rate of 0.72% and a trading volume of 3.096 million shares; Dongwang Times had a turnover rate of 2.02% and a trading volume of 17.0551 million shares. Only Baiya Co., Ltd. met the conditions of a turnover rate below 1% and a trading volume below 5 million shares; Baiya Co., Ltd.'s 2025 third-quarter report was released on 2025-10-22.", "response_final_reference": "Baiya Co., Ltd.'s Q3 2025 report was released on October 22, 2025.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_15", "prompt": "Among Yalian Development, Juhua Co., Ltd., and Glodon Company Limited, according to their annual reports corresponding to December 31, 2024, which company had the highest monetary funds? On what date was that company's first research report released by December 11, 2025? On that date, among the three funds Southern ChiNext ETF Feeder C, Bosera Dual-Season Benefit Six-Month Holding Period Bond C, and E Fund CSI 500 ETF Feeder Initiated Y, which fund had the highest return over the past 3 months? What was that fund's unit NAV on 2025-03-12?", "reference_response": "According to the annual report data as of December 31, 2024: Yalian Development's monetary funds were RMB 165,401,776.68, Juhua Co., Ltd.'s monetary funds were RMB 2,663,761,199.84, and Glodon’s monetary funds were RMB 3,905,302,411.51, among which Glodon had the highest monetary funds; as of December 11, 2025, the first research report released on Glodon in 2025 was on March 24, 2025; on March 24, 2025, the nearly 3-month return of Southern ChiNext ETF Link C was -2.606%, the nearly 3-month return of Bosera Shuangjiyi Six-Month Holding Period Bond C was 0.5966%, and the nearly 3-month return of E Fund CSI 500 ETF Link Initiated Y was 1.23%, among which E Fund CSI 500 ETF Link Initiated Y had the highest return; according to the data updated on 2025-12-11, the E Fund CSI 500 ETF Link Initiated Y fund (code: 022913.OF) had a unit NAV of RMB 1.4127, an accumulated unit NAV of RMB 1.4127, and a daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV of -0.04% on 2025-03-12.", "response_final_reference": "1.4127 yuan Scoring criterion: accurate to 1.41", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_16", "prompt": "Among the four dates 2024-02-02, 2024-11-27, 2025-04-08, and 2025-09-24, on which date did Southern CSI New Energy ETF Link C have the highest return over the past 6 months? In the cumulative quarterly report for the quarter corresponding to the date with the highest 6-month return, among the five companies China Film, Luxshare Precision, Taihe New Materials, Xichang Electric Power, and Donngang Holdings, which two companies had the highest total shareholders' equity? For those two companies, in the corresponding Q1 single-quarter report on 2024-01-02, which company had the higher operating profit? What was this company's turnover rate on 2024-04-01, respectively?", "reference_response": "On 2025-09-24, the past 6-month return of Southern CSI New Energy ETF Link C was 33.94%; on 2024-02-02 it was -35.35%; on 2024-11-27 it was 10.68%; and on 2025-04-08 it was -26.69%. Among these, the past 6-month return on 2025-09-24 was the highest. The corresponding cumulative Q3 report data for 2025-09-24 are as follows: China Film's total shareholders' equity was RMB 11,493,490,564.59, Luxshare Precision's was RMB 99,042,423,545.50, Taihe New Materials' was RMB 7,817,752,823.02, Xichang Electric Power's was RMB 1,357,160,773.98, and Donggang Co., Ltd.'s was RMB 1,410,890,218.69. Ranking by the percentile of total shareholders' equity (higher ranks first), the top two companies were Luxshare Precision (1st) and China Film (2nd). The Q1 single-quarter report data corresponding to 2024-01-02 show that Luxshare Precision's operating profit was RMB 2,807,625,713.01, and China Film's operating profit was RMB 139,257,430.53. Comparing by operating profit percentile (higher ranks first), Luxshare Precision ranked 1st and China Film ranked 2nd. On 2024-04-01, Luxshare Precision's turnover rate was 0.87%.", "response_final_reference": "Luxshare Precision's turnover rate was 0.87%.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_17", "prompt": "Which fund ranked higher (with a smaller percentile) in the return ranking at the end of 2024, Southern SSE 380 ETF Link A or China Merchants SSE Consumer 80 ETF Link C? When was that fund established? In the cumulative quarterly report period corresponding to that establishment date, among the three companies Tianyuan Dike, Dadongnan, and Xinjiang Tianye, which company had total current liabilities exceeding RMB 2 billion and total non-current assets exceeding RMB 2 billion? On what date was that company’s 2025 Q2 single-quarter report released?", "reference_response": "Year-end 2024 data show: Southern SSE 380 ETF Linked A ranked 1862nd in return performance (among 2974 peer funds), while China Merchants SSE Consumer 80 ETF Linked C ranked 2200th (with the same total number of peer funds); the percentile for Southern SSE 380 ETF Linked A is 1862/2974≈62.6%, and the percentile for China Merchants SSE Consumer 80 ETF Linked C is 2200/2974≈74.0%, therefore Southern SSE 380 ETF Linked A ranks higher (with a smaller percentile); Southern SSE 380 ETF Linked A was established on September 20, 2011. In the cumulative report for the third quarter of 2011 (as of September 30, 2011), Tianyuan Dike had total current liabilities of 16.2685 million yuan (about 0.16 billion yuan) and total non-current assets of 335.4729 million yuan (about 3.35 billion yuan); Dadongnan had total current liabilities of 605.6183 million yuan (about 6.06 billion yuan) and total non-current assets of 1796.4739 million yuan (about 17.96 billion yuan); Xinjiang Tianye had total current liabilities of 2244.7177 million yuan (about 22.45 billion yuan) and total non-current assets of 2497.9514 million yuan (about 24.98 billion yuan). Only Xinjiang Tianye meets the condition that total current liabilities exceed 2.0 billion yuan and total non-current assets exceed 2.0 billion yuan. Xinjiang Tianye's 2025 Q2 single-quarter report was released on August 28, 2025.", "response_final_reference": "August 28, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_18", "prompt": "Among the three funds — Southern Pension Target Date 2035 Three-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) A, ICBC Credit Suisse SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Link C, and Essence Xiyue Steady Pension One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) A — as of July 11, 2025, which two funds had the highest returns over the past 3 months? Of those two funds, in 2024, which fund had an annual return percentile ranking below 31% and an actual price change of more than 5%? In the annual reports for the year in which that fund was established, among Dashenlin, Dahua Technology, and Jingjin Equipment, which company had a gross profit margin on sales of more than 35% and a year-on-year growth in net profit attributable to the parent of more than 10%?", "reference_response": "As of July 11, 2025, the return over the past 3 months for Nanfang Pension Target Date 2035 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A was 4.87%, the return over the past 3 months for ICBC Credit Suisse SSE STAR Market 50 Component ETF Link C was -1.43%, and the return over the past 3 months for Essence Xiyue Steady Pension One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) A was 4.24%; comparing by quantile (the higher the return, the higher the ranking), the top two were Nanfang Pension Target Date 2035 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A (1st quantile) and Essence Xiyue Steady Pension One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) A (2nd quantile); year-end 2024 data show: Nanfang Pension Target Date 2035 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A ranked 1548 (total number of peer funds: 5052), ranking quantile = 1548/5052≈30.6%, actual price change was 7.97%; Essence Xiyue Steady Pension One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) A ranked 1381 (total number of peer funds: 1810), ranking quantile = 1381/1810≈76.3%, actual price change was 2.64%; only Nanfang Pension Target Date 2035 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A satisfies the conditions of ranking quantile below 31% (30.6%<31%) and actual price change above 5% (7.97%>5%); Nanfang Pension Target Date 2035 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A was established on November 6, 2018; in the corresponding 2018 annual reports, Dashenlin had a gross sales margin of 41.65%, and net profit attributable to the parent company increased by 11.93% year-on-year; Dahua Technology had a gross sales margin of 37.16%, and net profit attributable to the parent company increased by 6.34% year-on-year; Jingjin Equipment had a gross sales margin of 30.18%, and net profit attributable to the parent company increased by 18.70% year-on-year; only Dashenlin satisfies the conditions of gross sales margin above 35% and year-on-year growth in net profit attributable to the parent company above 10%.", "response_final_reference": "Dashenlin", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_19", "prompt": "On which of these five dates—2024-01-04, 2024-04-22, 2024-07-23, 2024-11-18, and 2025-03-21—did CEIBS Medical Innovation Equity C rank highest by the peer-category average three-month return metric? Before that date on which it ranked highest by the peer-category average three-month return metric, which of the following five companies—Meizhigao, JD Group-SWR, East Money, Aerospace Electric Appliances, and Sunrise East—published a meeting minutes document regarding communication on 2Q24 performance in the military industry? For that company, among the financial reports corresponding to the three time points 2024-03-14, 2024-07-30, and 2025-11-04, which two dates rank in the top two from highest to lowest by the monetary funds metric? On those two dates, for Huitianfu Tianfu Growth Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF), Yongying CSI Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Gold Industry Equity ETF Initiated Linked C, Penghua Honghe Mixed Class C, Tianhong CSI Food & Beverage ETF Linked C, and ICBC Anyu Active One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A, which date had the highest average performance by the near-1-month return metric?", "reference_response": "The peer average three-month return on 2024-11-18 was 0.1565%, the highest among these five days. The specific data are as follows: 2024-01-04: -0.0664%, 2024-04-22: 0.0695%, 2024-07-23: -0.0325%, 2024-11-18: 0.1565%, 2025-03-21: 0.0403%. Therefore, based on the peer average three-month return metric, 2024-11-18 ranks 1st.; Before 2024-11-18, Hongtian Dianqi published earnings exchange meeting minutes on 2024-09-03 titled \"Military Industry 2Q24 Results Improved Quarter over Quarter, with Shipbuilding Segment Standing Out\" and \"2Q24 Military Industry Performance Review: Strong Growth in Shipbuilding Segment, but Receivables Risk Requires Attention\", which provided a detailed analysis of the quarter-over-quarter improvement in the military industry's Q2 results, the performance of the shipbuilding segment, and receivables risk. No relevant meeting minutes were found for the other companies (Meizhigao, JD Group-SWR, East Money, Risheng Dongfang). Therefore, only Hongtian Dianqi published exchange meeting minutes on the military industry's 2Q24 results.; The monetary funds corresponding to 2024-03-14, 2024-07-30, and 2025-11-04 were RMB 2968903048.67 for the single-quarter report for Q1 2024, RMB 2478267174.08 for the 2024 interim report, and RMB 1579095141.05 for the cumulative quarterly report for Q3 2025, respectively; ranked by quantile comparison (higher ranks earlier), the top two are 2024-03-14 and 2024-07-30.; 2024-03-14 (Yongying CSI Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Gold Industry Equity ETF Initiated Link C: 11.84%; Huitianfu Tianfu Growth Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF): 1.93%; Penghua Honghe Mixed Class C: 5.71%; Tianhong CSI Food & Beverage ETF Link C: 6.61%; ICBC Anyu Active One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A: 5.81%); 2024-07-30 (Yongying CSI Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Gold Industry Equity ETF Initiated Link C: -1.84%; Huitianfu Tianfu Growth Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF): -1.42%; Penghua Honghe Mixed Class C: -7.18%; Tianhong CSI Food & Beverage ETF Link C: -5.31%; ICBC Anyu Active One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) A: -4.58%). Calculated by equal-weight average: 2024-03-14 has a composite score of 6.38% (highest), and 2024-07-30 has a composite score of -4.07% (second highest), so the highest day is 2024-03-14.", "response_final_reference": "2024-03-14", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_2", "prompt": "For China Merchants Progressive Strategy Preferred 3-Month Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) A, on 2024-11-12 and 2025-04-03, which day had the better return over the past week (%)? On the better-performing day, between Kemet Gas and China Power, which company had a turnover rate exceeding 10% and a trading volume below 100 million shares? For that company, on what date was its first financial report released in 2025 (as of 2025-12-11)? On the financial report release date, among the five funds Yongying CSI Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Gold Industry Stock ETF Initiated Linked A, BOC Securities CSI 500 ETF Linked A, China Post Pure Bond Hengli Bond A, Ping An CSI Photovoltaic Industry ETF, and Invesco Great Wall Yixin Target Date 2040 Three-Year Holding Hybrid FOF, which fund's category had the highest peer-average return since inception?", "reference_response": "According to the data: on 2024-11-12, the past one-week return was -0.201983%; on 2025-04-03, the past one-week return was -1.851189%. Although the past one-week returns on both dates were negative, the loss of -0.201983% was smaller than -1.851189%, so 2024-11-12 performed better. On 2024-11-12, Kemet Gas had a turnover rate of 11.04% and a trading volume of 76,457,200 shares; China Power had a turnover rate of 6.82% and a trading volume of 151,352,600 shares. Only Kemet Gas met both conditions of having a turnover rate above 10% and a trading volume below 100 million shares. In 2025 (as of 2025-12-11), Kemet Gas first released a financial report on 2025-04-25, publishing the 2024 annual report and the Q1 2025 report. On 2025-04-25, among the five funds Yongying CSI Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Gold Industry Stock ETF Initiated Linked A, BOC Securities CSI 500 ETF Linked A, China Post Pure Bond Hengli Bond A, Ping An CSI Photovoltaic Industry ETF, and Invesco Great Wall Yixin Target Date 2040 Three-Year Holding Hybrid FOF, Invesco Great Wall Yixin Target Date 2040 Three-Year Holding Hybrid FOF, in the Hybrid - Equity-Biased category, had the highest return since inception, reaching 11.3773%.", "response_final_reference": "Invesco Great Wall Yixin Target Date 2040 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid FOF", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_20", "prompt": "When was Harvest CSI A100 ETF Initiated Feeder A established? In the semiannual report corresponding to its establishment date, among the four companies Johnson Electric Holdings, China Baoan, Huaan Securities, and Xinhua Department Store, which company had year-on-year growth in net profit attributable to the parent company exceeding 7.1% and a net profit margin on sales exceeding 35%? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, what was the past 1-month return of GF SZSE 100 ETF Feeder A?", "reference_response": "Harvest CSI A100 ETF Initiated Connect A was established on August 26, 2024. In the semiannual report corresponding to August 26, 2024, according to the 2024 semiannual report data (statistics as of June 30, 2024): Johnson Electric Holdings' net profit attributable to parent grew 7.14% year-on-year, with a net sales margin of 7.08%; China Baoan's net profit attributable to parent grew -60.18% year-on-year, with a net sales margin of 5.86%; Huaan Securities' net profit attributable to parent grew 8.65% year-on-year, with a net sales margin of 35.90%; Xinhua Department Store's net profit attributable to parent grew -13.27% year-on-year, with a net sales margin of 2.32%. Only Huaan Securities simultaneously meets the conditions that net profit attributable to parent grew by more than 7.1% year-on-year and net sales margin exceeded 35%. Huaan Securities was listed on the A-share market on December 6, 2016. On December 6, 2016, GF Shenzhen 100 ETF Connect A had a return rate of 2.267003% over the most recent 1 month.", "response_final_reference": "2.267003% Scoring standard: accurate to 2.26%-2.27%", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_21", "prompt": "On which of the dates 2024-02-01, 2024-12-10, and 2025-10-23 does the fund category of E Fund CSI 500 ETF Link Feeder Initiated C simultaneously satisfy that the peer average three-month return is greater than 0% and the peer average one-month return is greater than 0%? For the quarterly financial report date corresponding to that day, among the four companies Saili Medical, Shanzi Hi-Tech, Xuefeng Technology, and Mojochip, which company has the highest net sales margin? On what date did the company with the highest net sales margin first release a financial report in 2025? On that date, among the three funds GF Optional Consumption Link C, ChinaAMC Cloud Computing and Big Data ETF Link A, and GF ChiNext ETF Initiated Link Y, which fund has the highest return over the past 3 months?", "reference_response": "On 2024-02-01, the peer average three-month return was -0.1350%, and the peer average one-month return was -0.1173%, both less than 0%; on 2024-12-10, the peer average three-month return was 0.3118%, but the peer average one-month return was -0.0215%, so the conditions were not met; on 2025-10-23, the peer average three-month return was 0.1413%, and the peer average one-month return was 0.0049%, both greater than 0%. Therefore, only 2025-10-23 satisfies both conditions simultaneously. In the quarterly financial report corresponding to 2025-10-23 (2025 Q3 cumulative quarterly report), Saili Medical's net sales margin was -9.23%, Shanzi Hi-Tech's net sales margin was 17.38%, Xuefeng Technology's net sales margin was 10.81%, and Magchip Coatings' net sales margin was 12.26%. Therefore, Shanzi Hi-Tech had the highest net sales margin. Shanzi Hi-Tech first released a financial report in 2025 on 2025-04-30, which was the 2025 first-quarter single-quarter report. On 2025-04-30, GF Optional Consumption Link C's nearly three-month return was 0.959183673469%, ChinaAMC Cloud Computing and Big Data ETF Link A's nearly three-month return was 0.855008550086%, and GF ChiNext ETF Initiated Link Y's nearly three-month return was -5.38%; therefore, GF Optional Consumption Link C had the highest nearly three-month return.", "response_final_reference": "GF Optional Consumer Feeder C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_3", "prompt": "On which of the following dates did Bosera Steady Preferred 3-Month Holding Mixed (FOF) A have a unit NAV exceeding 1 yuan and a return over the past 3 months exceeding 3%: 2024-06-14, 2025-04-14, or 2025-10-15? In the quarterly financial report period corresponding to the date that meets the condition, among the five companies Qijing Machinery, Dongfang Materials, Industrial Fulian, ST Huadong, and Yanshan Technology, which company had the highest net sales margin? On what date was the 2023 annual report of the company with the highest net sales margin released? On that annual report release date, among the four funds GF Financial Real Estate Link A, ChinaAMC Juhui FOF A, China Merchants TMT50 ETF Link, and GF ChiNext ETF Initiated Link E, which fund had a return over the past week exceeding 2% and a return over the past 1 month lower than -1.5%?", "reference_response": "On 2024-06-14, the unit NAV of Bosera Steady Preferred 3-Month Holding Hybrid (FOF) A was 0.9424 yuan, with a return of 0.501% over the past 3 months; on 2025-04-14, the unit NAV was 0.9831 yuan, with a return of -0.917% over the past 3 months; on 2025-10-15, the unit NAV was 1.0529 yuan, with a return of 4.031% over the past 3 months. Only 2025-10-15 satisfies the conditions that the unit NAV exceeds 1 yuan (1.0529 > 1) and the return over the past 3 months exceeds 3% (4.031% > 3%). The Q3 cumulative quarterly report financial data corresponding to that day, 2025-10-15, show that Qijing Machinery's sales net profit margin was 3.41%, Dongfang Materials' sales net profit margin was 1.14%, Industrial Fulian's sales net profit margin was 3.73%, ST Huatong's sales net profit margin was 16.32%, and Yanshan Technology's sales net profit margin was 18.84%; among them, Yanshan Technology had the highest sales net profit margin. The release date of Yanshan Technology's 2023 annual report was 2024-04-18. On 2024-04-18, GF Financial Real Estate Link A had a return of 2.271744% over the past week and a return of -1.541346% over the past 1 month; ChinaAMC Juhui FOFA had a return of 0.077507% over the past week and a return of -0.339611% over the past 1 month; China Merchants TMT50 ETF Link had a return of 1.27422% over the past week and a return of -5.780629% over the past 1 month; GF ChiNext ETF Initiated Link E had a return of 0.309629% over the past week and a return of -6.727447% over the past 1 month. Only GF Financial Real Estate Link A simultaneously satisfies the conditions that the return over the past week exceeds 2% and the return over the past 1 month is below -1.5% (its return over the past 1 month of -1.541346% is below -1.5%).", "response_final_reference": "GF Financial Real Estate Feeder A", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_4", "prompt": "For the fund category to which Guotai Minze Balanced Pension Target Three-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) belongs, between the two dates 2024-03-07 and 2024-07-23, on the day when the category average three-month return was higher, which company had the higher turnover rate, Inspur Electronic Information or Lingyun Industrial? For the company with the higher turnover rate, in the single-quarter report as of April 23, 2024, what was the amount of monetary funds? And among the financial report quarters corresponding to the three time points 2025-01-07, 2025-02-06, and 2025-09-25, when ranked by the average performance of net cash flow from operating activities, which were the first two dates, respectively?", "reference_response": "On 2024-03-07, the peer-category average three-month return was -0.0150%; on 2024-07-23, the peer-category average three-month return was -0.0219%. In a negative-return environment, a smaller absolute value indicates a smaller loss, so -0.0150% on 2024-03-07 is higher than -0.0219% on 2024-07-23, meaning the peer-category average three-month return performed better on 2024-03-07; on March 7, 2024, Inspur Information had a turnover rate of 8.95%, while Lingyun Industrial had a turnover rate of 1.91%, so Inspur Information's turnover rate was higher; Inspur Information's monetary funds in the Q1 2024 quarterly report were RMB 7117017651.77; a higher net cash flow from operating activities indicates stronger operating cash inflows. Performance was best on 2025-01-07 (corresponding to the Q1 2025 quarterly report, with net cash flow from operating activities of RMB 5803063897.76) and 2025-02-06 (corresponding to the Q1 2025 quarterly report, with net cash flow from operating activities of RMB 5803063897.76), both of which were positive; performance was relatively poor on 2025-09-25 (corresponding to the Q3 2025 quarterly report, with net cash flow from operating activities of RMB -6998363179.71). Calculated by the average of percentile rankings (with higher indicator values ranked higher), the top two are 2025-01-07 and 2025-02-06 (tied for first).", "response_final_reference": "2025-01-07 and 2025-02-06", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_5", "prompt": "When was Huabao CSI Intelligent Electric Vehicle ETF Link C established? In the cumulative Q3 quarterly report corresponding to that establishment date, among Sentury Tire, Cambridge Technology, and Jinqiao Information, which company had the highest monetary funds? On what date was that company's 2025 Q3 report released? On that date, among the three funds China Merchants Hehui Pension Target Date 2040 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A, ChinaAMC Yongfu Hybrid A, and Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link C, which two ranked in the top two by return over the past 3 months?", "reference_response": "HuaBao CSI Intelligent Electric Vehicle ETF Link C was established on November 2, 2021. According to the cumulative Q3 quarterly report data corresponding to November 2, 2021: Sentury Tire's monetary funds were 686,771,338.54 yuan, CIG Shanghai Co., Ltd.'s monetary funds were 163,798,979.71 yuan, and Shanghai Golden Bridge InfoTech Co., Ltd.'s monetary funds were 369,486,995.16 yuan. Therefore, in terms of the monetary funds indicator, Sentury Tire was the highest, and Sentury Tire's 2025 Q3 report was released on 2025-10-31. On 2025-10-31, the nearly 3-month return rates were 7.167% for China Merchants and Wells Pension Target Date 2040 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A, 10.799% for ChinaAMC Yongfu Hybrid A, and -1.773% for Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link C. Comparing by percentile (the smaller the percentile, the higher the ranking): ChinaAMC Yongfu Hybrid A had a percentile of 0.0 (ranked 1st), China Merchants and Wells Pension Target Date 2040 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A had a percentile of 0.5 (ranked 2nd), and Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link C had a percentile of 1.0 (ranked 3rd). Therefore, the top two by nearly 3-month return rate are ChinaAMC Yongfu Hybrid A and China Merchants and Wells Pension Target Date 2040 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A.", "response_final_reference": "ChinaAMC Yongfu Hybrid A and China Merchants Hehui Target Date 2040 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid (FOF) A", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_6", "prompt": "Among the four funds Huashang Wengu Tianli Bond C, Southern CSI 500 ETF Link A, Fortis Steady Pension One-Year Hybrid (FOF) A, and CEIBS Ruizhi Selected One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), on 2024-02-06, which fund had a daily return rate exceeding 1% and a positive return over the past week? When was this fund established? Among the three companies Hongrun Construction, Vantone Development, and China Fortune Land Development, in the cumulative report for the quarter corresponding to that day, which company had negative net profit attributable to the parent and financial expenses exceeding 5 billion yuan? On what date was this company's 2025 semiannual report released?", "reference_response": "Only Zhongou Smart Select One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) simultaneously meets the conditions of having a daily return greater than 1% and a positive return over the past week; this fund was established on June 28, 2021. Only China Fortune Land Development simultaneously meets the conditions of having negative net profit attributable to the parent and financial expenses exceeding 5 billion yuan; China Fortune Land Development's 2025 semiannual report was released on August 26, 2025.", "response_final_reference": "August 26, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_7", "prompt": "Among Fuda Co., Ltd., Suzhou Dongshan Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Dalian Sun Asia Tourism Holding Co., Ltd., and Tongyu Communication Inc., if ranked by the quantile mean of monetary funds in the single-quarter reports for Q1 2024 and Q1 2025 (with a lower quantile mean ranking higher), which two companies are the top two? Among these two companies, in the 2025 Q1 single-quarter report, which company has net cash flow from operating activities exceeding RMB 10 million and net cash flow from financing activities greater than RMB 0? For that company, between the Q1 single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-04-03 and the Q3 single-quarter report corresponding to 2024-12-19, on which date is the attributable net profit to parent highest? On the date when the attributable net profit to parent is highest, what are the respective trailing one-year return rates of the three funds Huabao CSI Subdivided Chemical Industry Thematic ETF Link A, ICBC Credit Suisse Anyu Positive One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) C, and Morgan S&P Hong Kong Stock Connect Low Volatility Dividend Index A? Which fund has the highest trailing one-year return rate?", "reference_response": "Ranked by the quantile mean of monetary funds, the top two companies are Dalian Sun Asia and Fuda Co., Ltd. Among them, Fuda Co., Ltd. has a net cash flow from operating activities exceeding RMB 10 million and a net cash flow from financing activities greater than RMB 0. On 2024-12-19, Fuda Co., Ltd.'s net profit attributable to the parent in the single-quarter report for the third quarter of 2024 was RMB 47,292,538.15, while the corresponding net profit attributable to the parent in the single-quarter report for the first quarter on 2024-04-03 was RMB 31,595,670.03. Therefore, the net profit attributable to the parent in the single-quarter report corresponding to the third quarter on 2024-12-19 was the highest. On 2024-12-19, the one-year return rate of Huabao CSI Subdivided Chemical Industry Theme ETF Link A was 4.28%, ICBC Anyu Active One-Year Holding Mixed (FOF) C was 5.99%, and Morgan S&P Hong Kong Stock Connect Low Volatility Dividend Index A was 22.22%; the highest one-year return rate was Morgan S&P Hong Kong Stock Connect Low Volatility Dividend Index A, with a corresponding indicator value of approximately 22.22%.", "response_final_reference": "The one-year return of Huabao CSI Subdivided Chemical Industry Theme ETF Link A is 4.28%, ICBC Credit Suisse Anyu Active One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) C is 5.99%, and Morgan S&P Hong Kong Stock Connect Low Volatility Dividend Index A is 22.22%; the highest one-year return is Morgan S&P Hong Kong Stock Connect Low Volatility Dividend Index A, with a corresponding value of approximately 22.22%", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_8", "prompt": "As of December 11, 2025, what were the respective release dates of China's first three PMI data releases in 2025? On the first and third of those dates, when did Tinci Materials' trading volume first exceed 18,000,000 shares? On the day it first exceeded 18,000,000 shares, among the five funds Huashang Wengu Tianli Bond C, Bank of Communications CSI A500 Index A, Harvest CSI 300 ETF Feeder (LOF) C, Southern CSI Robotics ETF Initiated Feeder A, and Ping An CSI Auto Parts Theme ETF Feeder A, which fund's category had the highest three-year average return? For this fund, among 2024-03-27, 2024-09-02, and 2025-09-25, at which time was the year-to-date return the highest?", "reference_response": "As of December 11, 2025, the dates of the first three PMI data releases in China in 2025 were January 27, 2025, March 1, 2025, and March 31, 2025, respectively; on January 27, 2025, the trading volume was 17,247,000 shares, below 18,000,000 shares; on March 31, 2025, the trading volume was 18,337,800 shares, exceeding 18,000,000 shares. Therefore, the first time it exceeded 18,000,000 shares was March 31, 2025. The data on March 31, 2025 show that the three-year average return for the Bond - Long-Term Pure Bond Fund category was 0.1005%, and the three-year average return for the Index - Equity Fund category was -0.0251%. The Bond - Long-Term Pure Bond Fund category had the highest three-year average return. Huashang Wengu Tieli Bond C belongs to the Bond - Long-Term Pure Bond Fund category, so the three-year average return of its category was the highest; on 2025-09-25, the year-to-date return was the highest, at 10.01%. The specific data are: the year-to-date return on 2024-03-27 was -0.33%, on 2024-09-02 it was -4.42%, and on 2025-09-25 it was 10.01%.", "response_final_reference": "2025-09-25", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L2_4hop_9", "prompt": "On what date was Unisplendour Corporation Limited's 2023 annual report released? On that date, among the four funds Yongying CSI Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Gold Industry Stock ETF Initiated Linked A, Huabao CSI Shanghai-Hong Kong-Shenzhen New Consumption Index C, Fullgoal CSI Value ETF Linked C, and Yongying Semiconductor Industry Smart Selection Mixed Initiated C, which two funds had the highest return over the past week? Of those two funds, by the end of 2024, which fund had a ranking percentile below 0.05 and an interval return exceeding 20%? For that fund, on the two dates 2024-10-24 and 2025-03-14, under its Index-Stock Fund category, on which date was the peer average one-month return higher?", "reference_response": "UNISPLENDOUR's 2023 annual report was released on April 30, 2024. Among the four funds on April 30, 2024—Yongying CSI Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Gold Industry Stock ETF Initiated Feeder A, HuaBao CSI Shanghai-Hong Kong-Shenzhen New Consumption Index C, Fullgoal CSI Value ETF Feeder C, and Yongying Semiconductor Industry Smart Selection Hybrid Initiated C—the two funds with the highest returns over the past week were Yongying Semiconductor Industry Smart Selection Hybrid Initiated C and HuaBao CSI Shanghai-Hong Kong-Shenzhen New Consumption Index C. Data at the end of 2024 show that Yongying Semiconductor Industry Smart Selection Hybrid Initiated C ranked 345 (out of a total of 5052 comparable funds), with percentile ≈0.068 and interval return of 18.78%; HuaBao CSI Shanghai-Hong Kong-Shenzhen New Consumption Index C ranked 136 (out of a total of 2974 comparable funds), with percentile ≈0.046 and interval return of 33.31%. Only HuaBao CSI Shanghai-Hong Kong-Shenzhen New Consumption Index C satisfies the conditions of percentile below 0.05 (0.046<0.05) and return exceeding 20% (33.31%>20%). The average one-month return for the same category on October 24, 2024 was 0.2143%, higher than 0.0273% on March 14, 2025, so the return rate on October 24, 2024 was higher.", "response_final_reference": "The average one-month return for the same category on October 24, 2024 was 0.2143%, which was higher than 0.0273% on March 14, 2025; therefore, the return on October 24, 2024 was higher.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L2_4hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_1", "prompt": "On what date was the eurozone CPI released for the third time in 2023? In the cumulative report for the quarter to which that release date belongs, between GD Power Development and Tongyu Communication, which company had the higher year-on-year growth rate in net profit attributable to the parent company? For that company, what was the release date of the quarterly report corresponding to 2024-08-29? On that date, among the four funds GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder RMB (QDII) A, HuaBao Nasdaq Selected Stocks (QDII) C, HuaBao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF Initiated Feeder C, and Harvest CSI 300 ETF, which two funds had the highest return over the past 1 month? Of those two funds, on 2024-04-17, which fund had the larger fund size?", "reference_response": "The third release date of the Eurozone CPI in 2023 was June 16, 2023, when the May 2023 CPI data was released; in the semiannual report corresponding to June 16, 2023 (statistics as of June 30, 2023), Tongyu Communication (002792.SZ) had a year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company of -16.79%, and GD Power Development (600795.SH) had a year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company of 28.21%. Therefore, GD Power Development had the higher year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company.;The quarterly report corresponding to 2024-08-29 (Q3 cumulative quarterly report) was released on 2024-10-25.;On 2024-10-25, GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder RMB (QDII) A had a return of 1.656413% over the past 1 month, Huabao Nasdaq Select Equity (QDII) C had a return of 4.794021% over the past 1 month, Huabao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF Initiated Feeder C had a return of 11.573175% over the past 1 month, and Harvest CSI 300 ETF had a return of 15.479115% over the past 1 month; comparing by percentile (the smaller the percentile, the higher the ranking), Harvest CSI 300 ETF had a percentile of 0% (ranked 1st), Huabao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF Initiated Feeder C had a percentile of 33.33% (ranked 2nd), Huabao Nasdaq Select Equity (QDII) C had a percentile of 66.67% (ranked 3rd), and GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder RMB (QDII) A had a percentile of 100% (ranked 4th). Therefore, the top two funds with the highest returns over the past 1 month were Harvest CSI 300 ETF and Huabao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF Initiated Feeder C.;On 2024-04-17, Harvest CSI 300 ETF (code 160724.OF) had a fund size of 276,053,239.26 yuan, and Huabao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF Initiated Feeder C (code 017141.OF) had a fund size of 42,204,365.14 yuan. Therefore, Harvest CSI 300 ETF had the larger fund size.", "response_final_reference": "Harvest CSI 300 ETF", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_10", "prompt": "On what date was the 2025 Q3 holdings report for ChinaAMC Hong Kong Stock Connect Central SOE Dividend ETF Link C released? As of the latest available cumulative quarterly reports published by that date, among Jingrui Electronic Materials, Baose Co., Ltd., and DHC Software, which company had the highest net profit attributable to the parent company? On what date did that company first release a financial report in 2024? On that date, between the two funds Hengsheng Qianhai Consumption Upgrade Mixed and E Fund Artificial Intelligence ETF Link A, which fund had the higher return over the past 3 months? What was that fund's return ranking for 2023?", "reference_response": "The Q3 2025 holdings report of ChinaAMC Hong Kong Stock Connect Central SOE Dividend ETF Feeder C was released on October 28, 2025. As of October 28, 2025, the latest financial report is the cumulative quarterly report for the third quarter. The data show that Jingrui Electronic Materials' net profit attributable to the parent was 0.128 billion yuan (128,368,476.79 yuan), Baose Co., Ltd.'s net profit attributable to the parent was 0.050 billion yuan (50,191,782.61 yuan), and DHC Software's net profit attributable to the parent was 0.350 billion yuan (350,499,064.57 yuan). Therefore, DHC Software had the highest net profit attributable to the parent. DHC Software first released a financial report in 2024 on April 24, 2024, which was its Q1 2024 report. On April 24, 2024, Hengsheng Qianhai Consumption Upgrade Mixed had a return of 4.29% over the past 3 months, while E Fund Artificial Intelligence ETF Feeder A had a return of 9.38% over the past 3 months. E Fund Artificial Intelligence ETF Feeder A had the higher return over the past 3 months. According to data as of the end of 2023, the 2023 annual performance of E Fund Artificial Intelligence ETF Feeder A (code: 012733.OF) was as follows: its return ranking was 77, the total number of funds in the same category was 2226, the average return of funds in the same category was -0.0797%, and the fund's actual price change was 0.1165%.", "response_final_reference": "77", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_11", "prompt": "Of the two funds, Yongying Advanced Manufacturing Smart Selection Mixed Initiated C and Zhongtai Anyi Interest Rate Bond Bond C, which fund, on 2024-06-06, simultaneously satisfied that the return rate over the past 1 month was positive and the return rate over the past 6 months was greater than 2.5%? On what date was that fund's 2025 broad asset allocation data released? In the cumulative quarterly report corresponding to that date, among the three companies Zheshu Culture, Satellite Chemical, and China Galaxy, which company had the highest net cash flow from operating activities? For that company, between the interim report corresponding to 2024-08-29 and the annual report corresponding to 2024-12-30, when did total shareholders' equity first exceed RMB 140 billion? On that date, what were the past one-year return rates of Ping An CSI Hong Kong Stock Pharmaceutical ETF Feeder C and Ping An CSI 500 Index Enhanced A, respectively? Which fund performed better?", "reference_response": "Data as of 2024-06-06: Yongying Advanced Manufacturing Smart Selection Mixed Initiated C had a return rate of -7.607827% over the past 1 month (negative), and a return rate of -13.222056% over the past 6 months (less than 2.5%); Zhongtai Anyi Interest Rate Bond Bond C had a return rate of 0.411975% over the past 1 month (positive), and a return rate of 2.953115% over the past 6 months (greater than 2.5%). Only Zhongtai Anyi Interest Rate Bond Bond C simultaneously meets the conditions of having a positive return rate over the past 1 month and a return rate greater than 2.5% over the past 6 months; the release date of the 2025 broad asset allocation data for Zhongtai Anyi Interest Rate Bond Bond C was 2025-10-28; the cumulative Q3 quarterly report corresponding to 2025-10-28 (with statistical cutoff date of 2025-09-30) shows that the net cash flow from operating activities of Zhejiang Digital Culture was 323,954,222.55 yuan, Satellite Chemical was 6,621,187,829.21 yuan, and China Galaxy was 33,090,979,606.89 yuan. Ranked from highest to lowest by net cash flow from operating activities, the three companies are China Galaxy > Satellite Chemical > Zhejiang Digital Culture, and China Galaxy had the highest net cash flow from operating activities; in the interim report corresponding to 2024-08-29, total shareholders' equity was 133,961,032,821.44 yuan (approximately 133.961 billion yuan); in the annual report corresponding to 2024-12-30, total shareholders' equity was 140,499,444,271.18 yuan (approximately 140.499 billion yuan). 133.961 billion yuan is less than 140 billion yuan, while 140.499 billion yuan is greater than 140 billion yuan, therefore the first time total shareholders' equity exceeded 140 billion yuan was on 2024-12-30. On 2024-12-30, the 1-year return rate of Ping An CSI Hong Kong Stock Healthcare ETF Link C was -14.37%, and the 1-year return rate of Ping An CSI 500 Index Enhanced A was 6.67%; Ping An CSI 500 Index Enhanced A performed better.", "response_final_reference": "Ping An CSI 500 Index Enhanced A performed better", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_12", "prompt": "Among the four time points 2024-07-18, 2024-08-12, 2025-04-10, and 2025-05-28, when did Hebang Biotechnology’s main force net inflow first fall below negative 880,000 yuan (i.e., -880000 yuan)? On the day it first fell below negative 880,000 yuan, between the two funds, Hang Seng TECH ETF E Fund and Harvest New Energy New Materials Stock C, which fund’s category had both an average peer one-week return below 0% and an average peer six-month return below 0%? Among the four time points 2024-08-26, 2025-07-21, 2025-10-14, and 2025-10-29, when did that fund’s return over the past 1 year first exceed 30%? In the cumulative report as of that day, between Ciwen Media and Chunqiu Electronics, which company had both positive net profit attributable to the parent company and positive basic earnings per share? What sector/industry does that company belong to?", "reference_response": "According to historical capital flow data: on 2024-07-18, the net inflow of main funds was RMB 1,692,580.60 (positive); on 2024-08-12, it was RMB -11,088,256.00 (below -880,000 yuan); on 2025-04-10, it was RMB -3,440,257.36 (below -880,000 yuan); and on 2025-05-28, it was RMB -9,788,628.20 (below -880,000 yuan). Among these, 2024-08-12 was the first time it fell below negative 880,000 yuan; on 2024-08-12, for the index-stock fund category to which E Fund Hang Seng TECH ETF belongs, the peer average one-week return was -0.0006% and the peer average six-month return was -0.0195%; for the equity fund category to which Harvest New Energy New Materials Stock C belongs, the peer average one-week return was 0.0066% and the peer average six-month return was -0.0026%. Only the fund category to which E Fund Hang Seng TECH ETF belongs simultaneously met the conditions that the peer average one-week return was below 0% and the peer average six-month return was below 0%; according to the query results: the nearly 1-year return was -13.74% on 2024-08-26, 57.35% on 2025-07-21, 27.43% on 2025-10-14, and 31.21% on 2025-10-29. Among these, on 2025-07-21, the return of 57.35% was the first to exceed the whole-number threshold of 30%, while although it exceeded it again on 2025-10-29, that was not the first time. Therefore, the first time it exceeded 30% was 2025-07-21.;In the semiannual report corresponding to 2025-07-21 (statistics as of 2025-06-30):\\n- Ciwen Media's net profit attributable to the parent company was RMB -23,080,438.52 (negative), and basic earnings per share was RMB -0.05 (negative);\\n- Chunqiu Electronics' net profit attributable to the parent company was RMB 93,318,306.69 (positive), and basic earnings per share was RMB 0.21 (positive).\\nOnly Chunqiu Electronics simultaneously satisfied the conditions that net profit attributable to the parent company was positive and basic earnings per share was positive.;The sector/industry to which Chunqiu Electronics belongs is consumer electronics.", "response_final_reference": "Consumer electronics", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_13", "prompt": "Among the four companies Hanggang Co., Ltd., BusiSoft, Luzhou Laojiao, and Haoyue Care, which two companies had the highest net sales margin in the cumulative Q3 2025 reports? Among those two companies with the highest net sales margin, which company had total operating revenue exceeding 10 billion yuan and net profit attributable to the parent exceeding 5 billion yuan in the 2025 semiannual report? On what date was that company's 2025 first-quarter single-quarter report released? On that date, among the three funds Huabao CSI Shanghai-Hong Kong-Shenzhen New Consumption Index A, ChinaAMC Wenfu 6-Month Holding Mixed C, and ChinaAMC Yongfu Mixed A, which fund had the highest return over the past 6 months? For the fund category to which that fund belongs, between 2024-06-18 and 2024-10-14, on which date was the average one-year return of its peer category higher?", "reference_response": "For the cumulative Q3 quarterly report corresponding to 2025-10-29, the two companies with the highest net sales margin were Luzhou Laojiao (46.67%) and Haoyue Care (7.48%); among the two companies with the highest net sales margin, Luzhou Laojiao had total operating revenue of 16.454 billion yuan and net profit attributable to the parent of 7.663 billion yuan in its 2025 semiannual report, meeting the conditions that total operating revenue exceeded 10 billion yuan and net profit attributable to the parent exceeded 5 billion yuan; the release date of Luzhou Laojiao's single-quarter report for the first quarter of 2025 was 2025-04-28; on 2025-04-28, Huabao CSI Shanghai-Hong Kong-Shenzhen New Consumption Index A had a return rate over the past 6 months of 15.32%, ChinaAMC Wenfu Six-Month Holding Hybrid C was 2.18%, and ChinaAMC Yongfu Hybrid A was 1.00%, with Huabao CSI Shanghai-Hong Kong-Shenzhen New Consumption Index A having the highest return rate. According to the historical return rate data under the Index-Equity Fund category, the average one-year return rate of the same category on 2024-06-18 was -0.1349%, and the average one-year return rate of the same category on 2024-10-14 was 0.0497%; therefore, the return rate on 2024-10-14 was higher.", "response_final_reference": "2024-10-14", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_14", "prompt": "Which company, Haidilao or Hongfa Shares, in its single-quarter report for Q1 containing 2025-03-21, had monetary funds exceeding RMB 3.7 billion and accounts receivable below RMB 4.2 billion? For that company, on which of the two dates, 2025-04-18 (corresponding to the 2024 annual report) and 2025-08-14 (corresponding to the 2025 interim report), did net cash flow from operating activities first exceed RMB 2 billion? On that date, among the three funds Ping An CSI Photovoltaic Industry Index C, ChinaAMC Hang Seng ETF Link C, and Yongying ChiNext C, which two funds had the highest returns over the past 3 months? Of those two funds, on 2025-04-24, which fund had a return over the past 3 months greater than 0% and a return over the past 6 months greater than 0%? For that fund, among the three dates 2024-01-29, 2024-05-14, and 2025-03-26, which two dates ranked in the top two by percentile for the average 3-month return of its peer group in the QDII fund category?", "reference_response": "The Q1 single-quarter report data corresponding to 2025-03-21 show that Hongfa Shares had monetary funds of 3.752 billion yuan and accounts receivable of 4.131 billion yuan. Therefore, only Hongfa Shares satisfies both conditions of monetary funds exceeding 3.7 billion yuan and accounts receivable being below 4.2 billion yuan. In the 2024 annual report corresponding to 2025-04-18, net cash flow from operating activities was 2.235 billion yuan, exceeding 2 billion yuan; in the 2025 semiannual report corresponding to 2025-08-14, net cash flow from operating activities was 981 million yuan, below 2 billion yuan. Therefore, the first time it exceeded 2 billion yuan was 2025-04-18. On 2025-04-18, the 3-month returns of the three funds Ping An CSI Photovoltaic Industry Index C, ChinaAMC Hang Seng ETF Feeder C, and Yongying ChiNext C were: Ping An CSI Photovoltaic Industry Index C: -11.816065192084%, ChinaAMC Hang Seng ETF Feeder C: 9.34461951056%, and Yongying ChiNext C: -6.722762731179%. Therefore, the two funds with the highest 3-month returns were ChinaAMC Hang Seng ETF Feeder C and Yongying ChiNext C. On 2025-04-24, ChinaAMC Hang Seng ETF Feeder C had a 3-month return of 9.72% and a 6-month return of 8.04%; Yongying ChiNext C had a 3-month return of -7.80% and a 6-month return of -9.65%. Therefore, only ChinaAMC Hang Seng ETF Feeder C satisfies both conditions of a 3-month return greater than 0% and a 6-month return greater than 0%. The peer-category average 3-month return was 0.0442% on 2024-01-29, 0.1051% on 2024-05-14, and 0.0565% on 2025-03-26. Sorting the return values in ascending order gives: 0.0442% (2024-01-29), 0.0565% (2025-03-26), 0.1051% (2024-05-14). Percentile calculation (three time points evenly distributed): the percentile for 2024-01-29 is 0 (minimum), for 2025-03-26 is 0.5, and for 2024-05-14 is 1 (maximum). Ranking by smaller percentile first, the top two are 2024-01-29 and 2025-03-26.", "response_final_reference": "2024-01-29 and 2025-03-26", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_15", "prompt": "Among Orbbec Inc.-UW, Adisseo, Financial Street, and Derun Electronics, on the two days 2024-04-22 and 2024-09-19, which two companies ranked in the top two by the average of their daily volume percentile rankings (the smaller the percentile, the higher the rank)? Among the top two companies from Question 1, on the three days 2025-02-21, 2025-09-12, and 2025-09-18, which two dates ranked in the top two by average monetary funds performance? On the top two dates from Question 2, among Manulife India Equity (QDII), Ping An CSI New Energy Vehicle Industry ETF, HuaBao CSI A500 Index Enhanced C, and Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link A, which two funds ranked in the top two by the three-month average return performance of their respective fund categories? Among the top two funds from Question 3, which fund's return ranking percentile continued to rise (that is, its ranking kept worsening) in both 2023 and 2024? For the fund whose return ranking percentile continued to rise in Question 4, what is its composite score based on the average performance of near-3-month return (%) on the three days 2024-01-23, 2025-03-27, and 2025-05-16?", "reference_response": "The trading volume data for each company are as follows:\n- Orbbec Inc-UW (2024-04-22: 3,655,909 shares / 2024-09-19: 2,136,876 shares)\n- Adisseo (2024-04-22: 8,044,400 shares / 2024-09-19: 5,808,600 shares)\n- Financial Street (2024-04-22: 18,656,100 shares / 2024-09-19: 41,349,400 shares)\n- Derun Electronics (2024-04-22: 13,057,800 shares / 2024-09-19: 16,207,900 shares)\n\nQuantile mean calculation process:\n1. 2024-04-22 trading volume quantiles: Orbbec Inc-UW (0.00), Adisseo (0.33), Derun Electronics (0.67), Financial Street (1.00)\n2. 2024-09-19 trading volume quantiles: Orbbec Inc-UW (0.00), Adisseo (0.33), Derun Electronics (0.67), Financial Street (1.00)\n3. Quantile means: Orbbec Inc-UW (0.00), Adisseo (0.33), Derun Electronics (0.67), Financial Street (1.00)\n\nSorted by quantile mean from low to high, the top two are: Orbbec Inc-UW and Adisseo; 2025-02-21 (Adisseo 1608270356 yuan / Orbbec 747753916.65 yuan), 2025-09-12 (Adisseo 1759751219 yuan / Orbbec 613084761.75 yuan), 2025-09-18 (same data as 2025-09-12). Calculated by equal-weight average: 2025-02-21 average 1179007136.325 yuan, 2025-09-12 and 2025-09-18 average 1186417990.375 yuan. Sorted from high to low, the top three are: 2025-09-12 (1186417990.375 yuan), 2025-09-18 (1186417990.375 yuan), 2025-02-21 (1179007136.325 yuan). Therefore, the first two dates are 2025-09-12 and 2025-09-18.; According to the 3-month average return data of fund categories on the specified dates:\n- Manulife India Equity (QDII) (QDII-Equity category): 2025-09-12: 0.1078%, 2025-09-18: 0.1418%, average: 0.1248%\n- Ping An CSI New Energy Vehicle Industry ETF (Index-Equity category): 2025-09-12: 0.2128%, 2025-09-18: 0.2254%, average: 0.2191%\n- HuaBao CSI A500 Index Enhanced C (Index-Enhanced Equity Index category): 2025-09-12: 0.2120%, 2025-09-18: 0.2210%, average: 0.2165%\n- Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link A (Index-Equity category): 2025-09-12: 0.2128%, 2025-09-18: 0.2254%, average: 0.2191%\nSorted by 3-month average return from high to low:\n1. Ping An CSI New Energy Vehicle Industry ETF (0.2191%)\n2. Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link A (0.2191%)\n3. HuaBao CSI A500 Index Enhanced C (0.2165%)\n4. Manulife India Equity (QDII) (0.1248%)\nThe top two are Ping An CSI New Energy Vehicle Industry ETF and Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link A.; Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link A. The specific analysis is as follows:\n- Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link A:\n - 2023 return ranking: 60/2226 (quantile ≈ 2.70%)\n - 2024 return ranking: 360/2974 (quantile ≈ 12.11%)\n The quantile rose from 2.70% to 12.11%, showing a continuous upward trend (ranking worsened).\n- Ping An CSI New Energy Vehicle Industry ETF:\n - 2023 return ranking: 2062/2226 (quantile ≈ 92.63%)\n - 2024 return ranking: 2105/2974 (quantile ≈ 70.78%)\n The quantile fell from 92.63% to 70.78%, which does not satisfy the condition of continuous increase.\nTherefore, only Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link A had a continuously rising return-ranking quantile between 2023 and 2024.; Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link A had a past 3-month return of -1.029785% on 2024-01-23, -2.3944461474% on 2025-03-27, and 2.322070810605% on 2025-05-16; calculated by equal-weight average, the composite score is (-1.029785 -2.3944461474 + 2.322070810605)/3 ≈ -0.3674%. Scoring standard: accurate to -0.36% to -0.37%", "response_final_reference": "-0.3674% Scoring criteria: precise to -0.36% to -0.37%", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_16", "prompt": "For Country Garden, between the interim report corresponding to 2024-07-29 and the interim report corresponding to 2025-06-30, on which date was total shareholders' equity (unit: RMB) higher? On the date when total shareholders' equity was higher, between the two funds Penghua Carbon Neutral Theme Mixed A and Zhongou Medical Innovation Stock A, which fund had the highest return over the past 1 month? For the peer category of that fund, between 2025-09-29 and 2025-11-03, on which date was the peer-category average one-year return higher? In the cumulative quarterly report corresponding to that date, between PSBC and Seazen Holdings, which company's total shareholders' equity exceeded RMB 100 billion and its undistributed profit exceeded RMB 300 billion? When was that company listed?", "reference_response": "In the semiannual report corresponding to 2024-07-29 (reporting period ending 2024-06-30), Country Garden's total shareholders' equity was RMB 13,911,000,000; in the semiannual report corresponding to 2025-06-30 (reporting period ending 2025-06-30), total shareholders' equity was RMB -26,072,000,000. A higher total shareholders' equity indicates stronger net assets, so the semiannual report corresponding to 2024-07-29 had higher total shareholders' equity; on 2024-07-29, Penghua Carbon Neutral Theme Hybrid A had a past 1-month return of -8.58%, and Zhongou Medical Innovation Stock A had a past 1-month return of -1.64%. Therefore, Zhongou Medical Innovation Stock A had the higher past 1-month return; according to data updated on 2025-12-15: the category average one-year return on 2025-09-29 was 0.4315%, and the category average one-year return on 2025-11-03 was 0.3283%. The category average one-year return on 2025-09-29 was higher; according to the corresponding Q3 cumulative quarterly report for 2025-09-29 (that is, the cumulative financial report for January-September 2025): Seazen Holdings had total shareholders' equity of RMB 7.860 billion and undistributed profit of RMB 5.579 billion; Postal Savings Bank of China had total shareholders' equity of RMB 1,165.875 billion and undistributed profit of RMB 322.311 billion. Only Postal Savings Bank of China simultaneously meets the conditions of total shareholders' equity exceeding RMB 100 billion and undistributed profit exceeding RMB 300 billion, and Postal Savings Bank of China was listed on the A-share market on 2019-12-10.", "response_final_reference": "December 10, 2019.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_17", "prompt": "For Nonferrous Metals (alternative type - commodity funds), among the three dates 2024-01-23, 2025-06-27, and 2025-08-29, on which date was the peer-category average one-year return the highest? In the quarterly report corresponding to the date when the peer-category average one-year return was the highest, among the five companies Nord Shares, Changlian Shares, United Imaging Healthcare, Laobaigan Liquor, and Aerospace Electric Appliances, which company had the highest net profit attributable to the parent company? For this company, among the three dates 2024-12-13, 2025-03-07, and 2025-08-18, on which date was the financing balance the highest? On that date, between the two funds Huabao CSI 100 ETF Link C and Zhongtai Anyi Rate Bond Bond C, which fund had the highest return over the past 3 months? For that fund, among the five dates 2024-05-07, 2025-04-23, 2025-05-15, 2025-07-15, and 2025-10-30, on which date did the peer-category average three-year return of its fund category exceed 0.4% and the peer-category average one-year return exceed 0.29%?", "reference_response": "On 2025-06-27, the peer average one-year return for nonferrous metals (alternative type - commodity funds) was 0.2823%; on 2024-01-23 it was 0.0833%; and on 2025-08-29 it was 0.2720%. Therefore, 2025-06-27 had the highest peer average one-year return. In the corresponding Q2 quarterly report for June 27, 2025, Nuode Shares' net profit attributable to the parent company was -34.7607 million yuan, Changlian Shares' net profit attributable to the parent company was 36.6158 million yuan, Laobaigan Liquor's net profit attributable to the parent company was 168.4181 million yuan, and Aerospace Electric Appliances' net profit attributable to the parent company was 40.1341 million yuan. The net profit attributable to the parent company data for United Imaging Healthcare is missing. Therefore, Laobaigan Liquor had the highest net profit attributable to the parent company. On 2024-12-13, Laobaigan Liquor's financing balance was 715,313,717 yuan; on 2025-03-07 it was 637,431,744 yuan; and on 2025-08-18 it was 546,272,205 yuan. Therefore, the financing balance was highest on 2024-12-13. On 2024-12-13, the nearly 3-month return of HuaBao CSI 100 ETF Linked C was 19.08%, while the nearly 3-month return of Zhongtai Anyi Rate Bond Bond C was 2.40%. Therefore, HuaBao CSI 100 ETF Linked C had the highest nearly 3-month return. On 2024-05-07: the peer average one-year return was -0.1047%, and the peer average three-year return was -0.1923%; on 2025-04-23: the peer average one-year return was 0.1555%, and the peer average three-year return was 0.0266%; on 2025-05-15: the peer average one-year return was 0.1324%, and the peer average three-year return was 0.0389%; on 2025-07-15: the peer average one-year return was 0.2674%, and the peer average three-year return was 0.0098%; on 2025-10-30: the peer average one-year return was 0.2957%, and the peer average three-year return was 0.4019%. Only 2025-10-30 meets the condition that the peer average one-year return exceeds 0.29% and the peer average three-year return exceeds 0.4%.", "response_final_reference": "October 30, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_18", "prompt": "What was the release date of Guotai Haitong's 2024 Q2 single-quarter report? On that date, among the three funds GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder RMB (QDII) C, HuaBao CSI Fintech Theme ETF Feeder A, and ChiNext ETF, which fund had a return greater than 0% over the past week and a return greater than 0% over the past 1 month? When was that fund established? In the single-quarter report corresponding to the date that fund was established, among Kangping Technology, Tongling Nonferrous Metals, Sichuan Energy Power, and Huazi Industrial, which company had the highest net cash flow from operating activities? On what date was that company's 2025 Q3 report released?", "reference_response": "Guotai Haitong's 2024 Q2 quarterly report was released on 2024-08-30. As of 2024-08-30, GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder RMB (QDII) C had a return of -0.693431% over the past week and 4.13318% over the past month; HuaBao CSI Fintech Theme ETF Feeder A had a return of 3.244552% over the past week and 0.787898% over the past month; ChiNext ETF had a return of 2.154576% over the past week and -3.112111% over the past month. Only HuaBao CSI Fintech Theme ETF Feeder A satisfies both conditions of having a return greater than 0% over the past week and greater than 0% over the past month. HuaBao CSI Fintech Theme ETF Feeder A was established on November 25, 2021. In the corresponding Q3 quarterly report for 2021-11-25, Kangping Technology's net cash flow from operating activities was -30,008,550.85 yuan, Tongling Nonferrous was 2,679,252,647.39 yuan, CNGD was 183,674,501.06 yuan, and Huazi Industrial was -2,831,015.75 yuan. Therefore, Tongling Nonferrous had the highest net cash flow from operating activities; Tongling Nonferrous's 2025 Q3 report was released on 2025-10-28.", "response_final_reference": "October 28, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_19", "prompt": "What are the two release dates of the two Composite PMI data publications after 2024? Among the two release dates obtained in the first step, on which date did Huitianfu Intelligent Manufacturing Equity C have a past-1-month return rate exceeding 2%? Before the date determined in the second step, among the five companies Satellite Chemical, Shanghai Belling, Guangsheng Nonferrous Metals, Great Wall Motor, and Shentong Technology, which company held an earnings communication meeting and explicitly mentioned `better than expected` in the meeting content? Based on the company selected in the third step, what were the release dates of the first-quarter single-quarter reports corresponding to February 26, 2025 and April 4, 2025, respectively? Between the two funds Huabao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF Initiated Link C and China Merchants CSI Baijiu Index C, which fund ranked higher in return among its peer funds in 2024? On what date was that fund established?", "reference_response": "The release dates of the last two composite PMI data points after 2024 were November 30, 2024 and December 31, 2024, respectively. 2024-11-30 was a non-trading day, so there was no data; the return over the most recent 1 month on 2024-12-31 was 2.241638%, exceeding 2%. Therefore, only 2024-12-31 satisfies the condition that the most recent 1-month return exceeded 2%. According to the 2024 performance communication meeting records: Satellite Chemical held a meeting on October 22, 2024, and the meeting content mentioned `better than expected` multiple times, for example, `the company's third-quarter report was actually far better than expected` and `Satellite as a whole was still relatively better than expected`; Great Wall Motor held a meeting on September 11, 2024, but the meeting content did not contain the expression `better than expected`; Shanghai Belling, Guangsheng Nonferrous, and Shentong Technology had no performance communication meeting records in 2024. Therefore, only Satellite Chemical satisfies the condition of having held a meeting with content explicitly mentioning `better than expected`; the corresponding first-quarter single-quarter report release date for February 26, 2025 was April 25, 2025, and the corresponding first-quarter single-quarter report release date for April 4, 2025 was also April 25, 2025. In 2024, the peer fund return ranking of Huabao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF Initiated Link C was 2017 (out of 2974 ranked funds), and the peer fund return ranking of China Merchants CSI Liquor Index C was 2846 (out of 2974 ranked funds). Since a smaller ranking number indicates a higher position, Huabao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF Initiated Link C had the higher return ranking. The inception date of Huabao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF Initiated Link C is December 13, 2022.", "response_final_reference": "December 13, 2022", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_2", "prompt": "Among the four funds—Rongtong Cash Treasure Money Market B, GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder (QDII) RMB F, Fullgoal ChiNext Artificial Intelligence ETF Initiated Feeder C, and Jinyuan Shunan Yuanqi Flexible Allocation Hybrid—which fund’s category had the highest average one-year return among peers on 2025-01-21? For the fund identified in the previous step whose category had the highest return, between 2024-09-10 and 2025-08-28, on which date was its return since inception higher? In the quarterly report period corresponding to the date with the higher return, among the four companies China Telecom, Shanghai Electric Power, Walvax Biotechnology, and JCET Group, which company had the highest net cash flow from operating activities? What sector/industry does this company belong to? What constituent ETFs/funds are related to this sector?", "reference_response": "On 2025-01-21, the peer average one-year return for the Money Market Fund category to which Rongtong Cash Treasure Money B belongs was 0.0093%; the peer average one-year return for the QDII-Equity Fund category to which GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder (QDII) RMB F belongs was 0.2604%; the peer average one-year return for the Index-Equity Fund category to which Fullgoal ChiNext Artificial Intelligence ETF Initiated Feeder C belongs was 0.1800%; and the peer average one-year return for the Hybrid-Flexible Allocation Fund category to which Jinyuan Shun'an Yuanqi Flexible Allocation Hybrid belongs was 0.1136%. Among them, the category to which GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder (QDII) RMB F belongs had the highest peer average one-year return. For GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder (QDII) RMB F, the return since inception was -1.32% on 2024-09-10 and 21.32% on 2025-08-28, so the return since inception was highest on 2025-08-28. The financial reporting period corresponding to 2025-08-28 was the single-quarter report for Q3 2025. Financial data: China Telecom's net cash flow from operating activities was 40.277 billion yuan, Shanghai Electric Power's was 6.279 billion yuan, WoWu Biologics' was 0.086 billion yuan, and JCET's was 1.354 billion yuan. Therefore, the company with the highest net cash flow from operating activities was China Telecom. China Telecom's sector/industry is Communications. Related ETFs/funds include: Telecom ETF Fund, Caitong STAR Market LOF, Central SOE ESG ETF, GF Communications ETF, and Central SOE STAR Market ETF. Scoring standard: to receive credit, all ETFs/funds must be listed; listing extra ones will not receive credit.", "response_final_reference": "Telecommunications; relevant ETFs/funds include: Telecom ETF Fund, Caitong STAR LOF, Central SOE ESG ETF, GF Telecommunications ETF, Central SOE STAR ETF Scoring criteria: To receive credit, all ETFs/funds must be listed; additional answers do not count.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_20", "prompt": "Among the three funds Jinyuan Shun'an Yuanqi Flexible Allocation Hybrid, GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder RMB (QDII) A, and Zhongtai Anyi Interest Rate Bond C, on 2024-01-24, which two funds ranked in the top two by one-year return rate relative to the peer average? Among the top two funds identified in the first step, on 2025-10-21, which fund had the highest return rate over the past 1 year? What is the establishment date of the fund with the highest return rate in the second step? For the annual financial report year corresponding to the establishment date obtained in the third step, among the three companies Financial Street, Tongrun Equipment, and Jikai Shares, which company had year-on-year growth in net profit attributable to the parent company exceeding 0% and a net sales margin exceeding 7%? What is the publication date of the 2023 semiannual report of the company that meets the conditions in the fourth step?", "reference_response": "Data as of 2024-01-24 show that the average one-year return for funds in the same category as Jinyuan Shun'an Yuanqi Flexible Allocation Hybrid was -0.1974%, the average one-year return for funds in the same category as GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder RMB (QDII) A was 0.0090%, and the average one-year return for funds in the same category as Zhongtai Anyi Rate Bond Bond C was 0.0385%. Ranked by return, the top two were Zhongtai Anyi Rate Bond Bond C and GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder RMB (QDII) A. Among the top two funds, as of 2025-10-21, Zhongtai Anyi Rate Bond Bond C had a past-1-year return of 4.024%, while GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder RMB (QDII) A had a past-1-year return of 20.796%. Therefore, GF Nasdaq 100 ETF Feeder RMB (QDII) A had the higher past-1-year return, and its inception date is January 16, 2015; in the 2015 annual reports (with the statistical cutoff date of 2015-12-31), Financial Street's net profit attributable to parent company owners increased year-on-year by -23.03%, with a net sales margin of 14.55%; Tongrun Equipment's net profit attributable to parent company owners increased year-on-year by 13.52%, with a net sales margin of 7.51%; Jikai Shares' net profit attributable to parent company owners increased year-on-year by -35.89%, with a net sales margin of 8.58%. Only Tongrun Equipment simultaneously met the conditions of year-on-year growth in net profit attributable to parent company owners exceeding 0% (13.52% > 0%) and net sales margin exceeding 7% (7.51% > 7%). Tongrun Equipment's 2023 semiannual report was released on 2023-08-29.", "response_final_reference": "45167", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_3", "prompt": "On which of the three dates, 2024-01-29, 2024-07-23, and 2024-12-16, did the Dividend ETF’s past 6-month return first exceed 6%? In the financial reporting period corresponding to the day when it first exceeded 6%, between China Star Map and Sunway New Materials, which company had total shareholders’ equity exceeding RMB 4 billion and monetary funds exceeding RMB 1 billion? On what date was that company’s 2025 semiannual report released? On that date, among the three funds Ping An CSI Photovoltaic Industry ETF, Zhongtai Shuangyi Bond C, and Bank of Communications CSI A500 Index C, which fund had the largest fund size? Among the five dates 2024-03-20, 2024-06-21, 2025-03-25, 2025-05-16, and 2025-06-20, on which date did the peer-category average 3-month return and the peer-category average year-to-date return of that fund’s category both fall below 0%?", "reference_response": "On 2024-01-29, the Dividend ETF's return over the past 6 months was -14.627759%, below 6%; on 2024-07-23, the return over the past 6 months was 4.412887%, still below 6%; on 2024-12-16, the return over the past 6 months reached 7.374794%, exceeding 6% for the first time. Therefore, the first date it exceeded 6% was 2024-12-16, and the corresponding financial reporting period was the 2024 annual report. Data: GEOVIS Technology's total shareholders' equity was 4,596,074,850.83 yuan (approximately 4.596 billion yuan), and monetary funds were 1,292,318,553.32 yuan (approximately 1.292 billion yuan); Shangwei New Materials' total shareholders' equity was 1,270,465,853.89 yuan (approximately 1.270 billion yuan), and monetary funds were 270,552,321.76 yuan (approximately 271 million yuan). Only GEOVIS Technology simultaneously meets the conditions of total shareholders' equity exceeding 4 billion yuan and monetary funds exceeding 1 billion yuan. GEOVIS Technology's 2025 semiannual report release date was August 29, 2025. On August 29, 2025, Ping An CSI Photovoltaic Industry ETF had a fund size of 70,863,882.63 yuan, Zhongtai Shuangyi Bond C had a fund size of 303,858,234.94 yuan, and Bank of Communications CSI A500 Index C had a fund size of 51,483,394.96 yuan; Zhongtai Shuangyi Bond C had the largest fund size. The fund category to which this fund belongs is: bond type - mixed bond. On 2025-03-25, the category average return over three months on that date was -0.0017% (below 0%), and the category average return year-to-date was -0.0037% (below 0%). The situation at other time points is as follows: - 2024-03-20: three-month return 0.0144% (>0), year-to-date 0.0108% (>0) - 2024-06-21: three-month return 0.0113% (>0), year-to-date 0.0224% (>0) - 2025-05-16: three-month return 0.0030% (>0), year-to-date 0.0033% (>0) - 2025-06-20: three-month return 0.0114% (>0), year-to-date 0.0067% (>0). Only 2025-03-25 simultaneously satisfies both conditions.", "response_final_reference": "March 25, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_4", "prompt": "Among the four time points 2024-01-02, 2025-04-16, 2025-06-12, and 2025-09-10 for Guanggang Gases, which two time points rank highest by percentile in net inflow of main funds? Among those two time points, on which day does the category to which Hongtu Innovation Healthcare Stock belongs have both an average one-month return for its peer category exceeding 0% and an average year-to-date return for its peer category exceeding 0%? In the financial report for the period containing that day, among the five companies Yingjia Gongjiu, Hemei Group, Sinopack Electronic Materials, Kingsignal Technology, and ST Xiangxue, which two companies have the highest net sales margin? For those two companies, how should cash and cash equivalents be ranked from highest to lowest in the single-quarter report for Q1 2024? For those two companies, what were their respective financing balances on 2025-03-07? Which company had the higher financing balance?", "reference_response": "Among the four time points 2024-01-02, 2025-04-16, 2025-06-12, and 2025-09-10 for Guanggang Gases, the two time points with the highest percentile rankings of main capital net inflow are 2025-06-12 (percentile 0) and 2025-04-16 (percentile 0.333). Between 2025-06-12 and 2025-04-16, for the category to which Hongtu Innovation Healthcare Stock belongs, on 2025-06-12 the peer average one-month return was 0.0239% (above 0%), and the peer average year-to-date return was 0.0672% (above 0%); while on 2025-04-16 the peer average one-month return was -0.0746% (below 0%), and the peer average year-to-date return was -0.0007% (below 0%). Therefore, only 2025-06-12 satisfies the condition that the returns are above 0%. In the semiannual report period to which 2025-06-12 belongs, the net sales margins of Yingjia Gongjiu, Hemei Group, Sunresin New Materials, Jinxinnuo, and ST Xiangxue were: Yingjia Gongjiu 35.87%, Sunresin New Materials 7.63%, Jinxinnuo -0.55%, Hemei Group -3.50%, and ST Xiangxue -26.61%. The two companies with the highest net sales margins are Yingjia Gongjiu and Sunresin New Materials. In the Q1 2024 single-quarter report (statistical cutoff date: March 31, 2024), Yingjia Gongjiu's monetary funds were 2,954,997,315.11 yuan, and Sunresin New Materials' monetary funds were 406,345,868.02 yuan. Ranked by monetary funds from high to low, the order is Yingjia Gongjiu, Sunresin New Materials. On 2025-03-07, Yingjia Gongjiu's financing balance was 294 million yuan, and Sunresin New Materials' financing balance was 338 million yuan; the higher financing balance was Sunresin New Materials.", "response_final_reference": "Yingjia Gongjiu's margin financing balance is 294 million yuan, Xinlai Yingcai's margin financing balance is 338 million yuan, and the one with the higher margin financing balance is Xinlai Yingcai.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_5", "prompt": "Which day had better performance in the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV of Ping An SZSE 300 Enhanced Index, 2025-02-28 or 2025-11-14? On the better-performing day, among Jinhongshun, Yiling Pharmaceutical, and Heshun Petroleum, which company had a net inflow of main funds exceeding RMB 26 million? For that company, on what date was its Q1 2025 quarterly report released? On that date, between the two funds Morgan S&P Hong Kong Stock Connect Low Volatility High Dividend Index A and Fullgoal CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Internet ETF Link C, which fund had a higher peer-average three-year return ranking? For that fund, what was the return rate over the past one month on 2025-05-08?", "reference_response": "On 2025-02-28, the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV of Ping An SZSE 300 Index Enhanced was -2.69%; on 2025-11-14, the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV was -2.17%. Since -2.17% is greater than -2.69%, the performance on 2025-11-14 was better; on 2025-11-14, the net inflow of main funds for Jinhongshun was -6,242,543 yuan (about -6.2425 million yuan), the net inflow of main funds for Yiling Pharmaceutical was 25,704,351.29 yuan (about 25.7044 million yuan), and the net inflow of main funds for Heshun Petroleum was 26,188,922.98 yuan (about 26.1889 million yuan). Only Heshun Petroleum met the condition of main fund net inflow exceeding 26 million yuan; the release date of Heshun Petroleum's single-quarter report for Q1 2025 was 2025-04-26; on 2025-04-26, the data for the Index Fund - Equity Fund category (code 1701), to which Morgan S&P Hong Kong Stock Connect Low Volatility High Dividend Index A and Fullgoal CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Internet ETF Linked C belong, showed that the average three-year return for the category was 0.0943%. Since the two funds belong to the same category, their three-year returns were both 0.0943%, tying for first in the peer percentile comparison. On 2025-05-08, the one-month return of Morgan S&P Hong Kong Stock Connect Low Volatility High Dividend Index A was 8.69%, and the one-month return of Fullgoal CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Internet ETF Linked C was 15.16%.", "response_final_reference": "15.16%", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_6", "prompt": "On what date did China Southern Airlines first release its financial report in 2025? On that date, among the five funds Ping An CSI Hong Kong Stocks Healthcare ETF Feeder E, Jinyuan Shunan Yuanqi Flexible Allocation Mixed, Huatai Securities Juying One-Year Holding A, Guotai Tongli 9-Month Holding Period Mixed C, and Nonferrous Metals ETF, which fund’s category had the highest average one-year return among peers? For that fund’s category, among 2024-01-22, 2025-02-10, and 2025-10-22, on which date were both the average two-year return among peers greater than 0% and the average three-year return among peers greater than 0%? As of the latest cumulative quarterly report before that qualifying date, between Narada Power and Seazen Holdings, which company had the highest net profit attributable to the parent company’s shareholders? For that company, on what date did it last release its financial report in 2025?", "reference_response": "China Southern Airlines first released a financial report in 2025 on April 30, 2025, and it was the 2025 first-quarter report (Q1 single-quarter report); on April 30, 2025, the peer-category average one-year return data for each fund's category were as follows: Ping An CSI Hong Kong Stocks Pharmaceutical ETF Feeder E (Index-Stock Fund) was 0.1098%, Jinyuan Shunan Yuanqi Flexible Allocation Hybrid (Hybrid-Flexible Fund) was 0.0516%, Huaan Securities Juying One-Year Holding A (Hybrid-Flexible Fund) was 0.0516%, Guotai Tongli 9-Month Holding Hybrid C (Hybrid-Flexible Fund) was 0.0516%, and Nonferrous Metals ETF had no category data. Therefore, Ping An CSI Hong Kong Stocks Pharmaceutical ETF Feeder E had the highest peer-category average one-year return within its category. For Ping An CSI Hong Kong Stocks Pharmaceutical ETF Feeder E, on 2024-01-22, the peer-category average two-year return was -0.3086% and the peer-category average three-year return was -0.3310%; on 2025-02-10, the peer-category average two-year return was -0.0227% and the peer-category average three-year return was -0.0945%; on 2025-10-22, the peer-category average two-year return was 0.3978% and the peer-category average three-year return was 0.3094%. Only 2025-10-22 satisfies both that the peer-category average two-year return is greater than 0% and the peer-category average three-year return is greater than 0%. As of October 22, 2025, the latest cumulative quarterly report was the Q3 cumulative quarterly report. Nandu Power's net profit attributable to the parent company was -220,287,861.98 yuan, and Seazen Holdings' net profit attributable to the parent company was 973,870,529 yuan. Therefore, Seazen Holdings had the highest net profit attributable to the parent company; Seazen Holdings last released a financial report in 2025 on October 31, 2025, and it was the 2025 third-quarter report (Q3 single-quarter report).", "response_final_reference": "October 31, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_7", "prompt": "On which of the two dates, 2025-09-17 and 2025-10-28, did Ping An CSI Artificial Intelligence Theme ETF Initiated Link A have the higher return over the past 3 months? On that date and on 2025-10-28, on which date did Xinghua Co., Ltd. have a trading volume of more than 10 million shares and a turnover rate of less than 1%? On the date when Xinghua Co., Ltd. had a trading volume of more than 10 million shares and a turnover rate of less than 1%, among the three funds Ping An Dividend Selection Shanghai-Hong Kong-Shenzhen C, CCB Hong Kong Stock Connect Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF, and ChinaAMC Hang Seng ETF Link, which fund had the highest return over the past 1 month? For that fund, on which of the two dates, 2024-09-30 and 2025-02-26, was the category average one-year return the highest? In the quarterly report for the period to which the date with the highest category average one-year return belongs, among the four companies New China Life Insurance, Lanshi Heavy Equipment, Fortior Technology, and Rundu Co., Ltd., which company had the highest year-on-year growth in net profit attributable to the parent company?", "reference_response": "On 2025-09-17, Ping An CSI Artificial Intelligence Theme ETF Initiated Connection A had a return rate of 52.37% over the past 3 months, and on 2025-10-28 it was 42.12%; the return rate was highest on 2025-09-17. On 2025-09-17, Xinghua Co., Ltd. had a trading volume of 46.1651 million shares and a turnover rate of 3.62%; on 2025-10-28, Xinghua Co., Ltd. had a trading volume of 12.3722 million shares and a turnover rate of 0.97%. Only 2025-10-28 meets the condition that trading volume exceeded 10 million shares and the turnover rate was below 1%. Data on 2025-10-28 show that: Ping An Dividend Select Shanghai-Hong Kong-Shenzhen C had a return rate of 4.1292% over the past 1 month, CCB Hong Kong Stock Connect Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF had a return rate of -1.2415% over the past 1 month, and ChinaAMC Hang Seng ETF Connection had a return rate of 0.5657% over the past 1 month. Among them, Ping An Dividend Select Shanghai-Hong Kong-Shenzhen C had the highest return rate over the past 1 month. For Ping An Dividend Select Shanghai-Hong Kong-Shenzhen C, the peer-category average one-year return rate was 0.0086% on 2024-09-30 and 0.1890% on 2025-02-26, so the peer-category average one-year return rate was highest on 2025-02-26. In the Q1 quarterly report for the period containing 2025-02-26: New China Life Insurance's year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company was 19%, Lanzhou LS Heavy Equipment's year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company was -56.08%, Fortior Technology's year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company was 4.42%, and Rundu Co., Ltd.'s year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company was -93.57%. The highest year-on-year growth in net profit attributable to the parent company was that of New China Life Insurance.", "response_final_reference": "New China Life Insurance", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_8", "prompt": "On what date did China Pacific Insurance have its first senior executive shareholding increase/decrease in 2024? On that date, among the four funds Xin'ao Performance-Driven Hybrid C, China Universal CSI Major Consumption ETF Link C, Guotai Shuangli Bond A, and HuaBao CSI Interbank Certificate of Deposit AAA Index 7-Day Holding Period, which fund had a negative return in the past 1 month and a return higher than -5% in the past 3 months? When was that fund established? On the date that fund was established, among the three companies Yuexiu Expressway A, Financial Street, and Jianfeng Group, which company had a negative price change and a turnover rate exceeding 1.5%? On what date was that company's 2024 annual report published?", "reference_response": "The first increase/decrease in holdings by China Pacific Insurance executives in 2024 occurred on September 12, 2024, when Ma Xin increased holdings by 10.0 thousand shares; on September 12, 2024, Xin'ao Performance-Driven Hybrid C had a return of -9.48% over the past 1 month and -15.41% over the past 3 months; ChinaAMC CSI Major Consumer ETF Feeder C had a return of -11.08% over the past 1 month and -18.26% over the past 3 months; Guotai Shuangli Bond A had a return of -2.74% over the past 1 month and -4.56% over the past 3 months; HuaBao CSI Interbank Certificate of Deposit AAA Index 7-Day Holding Period had a return of 0.11% over the past 1 month and 0.42% over the past 3 months. Only Guotai Shuangli Bond A meets the condition that the return over the past 1 month is negative and the return over the past 3 months is higher than -5%; Guotai Shuangli Bond A was established on March 11, 2009; on March 11, 2009, Yuexiu Expressway A had a price change of -0.00% and a turnover rate of 0.92%; Financial Street had a price change of 0.00% and a turnover rate of 2.26%; Jianfeng Group had a price change of -3.03% and a turnover rate of 1.59%. Only Jianfeng Group simultaneously meets the conditions of a negative price change (-3.03%) and a turnover rate exceeding 1.5% (1.59%); Jianfeng Group's 2024 annual report was released on April 22, 2025.", "response_final_reference": "April 22, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_5hop_9", "prompt": "On 2024-08-27, 2024-11-20, and 2025-04-17, for Huabao CSI 800 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link A, which date had the highest ranking by one-year return rate among peers (the higher, the better)? On the date with the highest ranking, among the four companies Hongli Zhihui, Runze Technology, Shanghai Construction Group, and JL MAG Rare-Earth, which two companies had the highest net inflow of main funds? Of those two companies, in the single-quarter report for Q3 2025, which company had R&D expenses exceeding 200 million yuan and net profit attributable to the parent company exceeding 500 million yuan? For that company, among the financial-report quarters corresponding to 2024-09-03, 2025-04-30, 2025-05-14, and 2025-06-13, on which date did the net cash flow from operating activities exceed 0 yuan and the net cash flow generated from investing activities also exceed 0 yuan? On that date, among the three funds ChinaAMC Hong Kong Stock Connect SOE Dividend ETF Link C, Guotai Growth Select Hybrid, and Industrial CSI Bank 50 Financial Bond Index A, which fund simultaneously satisfied a return rate of more than 1% over the past week and a return rate of more than 10% over the past 6 months?", "reference_response": "The highest average one-year return among peers on 2025-04-17 was 0.1214%, therefore it ranked 1st. On 2025-04-17, Hongli Zhihui had a net inflow of main funds of 583,627 yuan, Runze Technology had a net inflow of main funds of -46,097,748.20 yuan, Shanghai Construction had a net inflow of main funds of 21,094,748.92 yuan, and JL MAG Rare-Earth had a net inflow of main funds of -110,713,152.34 yuan. The two companies with the highest net inflow of main funds were Shanghai Construction and Hongli Zhihui. For Shanghai Construction and Hongli Zhihui, in the single-quarter report for Q3 2025, Shanghai Construction's R&D expenses were 2,419,178,072.84 yuan (about 2.419 billion yuan), and net profit attributable to the parent company was 501,026,010.98 yuan (about 501 million yuan), both exceeding 200 million yuan and 500 million yuan respectively. Hongli Zhihui's R&D expenses were 55,170,743.77 yuan (about 55 million yuan), and net profit attributable to the parent company was 60,429,214.03 yuan (about 60 million yuan), which do not meet the conditions. Therefore, only Shanghai Construction satisfies the conditions that R&D expenses exceed 200 million yuan and net profit attributable to the parent company exceeds 500 million yuan; on 2025-06-13, in the single-quarter report for Q2 2025 corresponding to 2025-06-13, Shanghai Construction's net cash flow from operating activities was 4799915374.95 yuan (greater than 0 yuan), and net cash flow from investing activities was 342046632.65 yuan (greater than 0 yuan); in the single-quarter report for Q3 2024 corresponding to 2024-09-03, net cash flow from operating activities was 1125563945.13 yuan (greater than 0 yuan), but net cash flow from investing activities was -1546448515.36 yuan (less than 0 yuan); in the single-quarter report for Q1 2025 corresponding to 2025-04-30, net cash flow from operating activities was -23280246512.26 yuan (less than 0 yuan), and net cash flow from investing activities was -1353691682.5 yuan (less than 0 yuan); 2025-05-14 also corresponds to the Q2 2025 single-quarter report, with the same data as 2025-06-13. Only 2025-06-13 satisfies the condition that net cash flow from operating activities is greater than 0 yuan and net cash flow from investing activities is greater than 0 yuan; on June 13, 2025, ChinaAMC Hong Kong Stock Connect Central SOE Dividend ETF Feeder C had a return of 3.78% over the past week and 14.05% over the past 6 months; Guotai Growth Select Mixed had a return of -3.35% over the past week and -21.66% over the past 6 months; Industrial CSI Bank 50 Financial Bond Index A had a return of 0.06% over the past week and 0.74% over the past 6 months. Only ChinaAMC Hong Kong Stock Connect Central SOE Dividend ETF Feeder C satisfies both conditions of having a return of more than 1% over the past week and more than 10% over the past 6 months.", "response_final_reference": "ChinaAMC Hong Kong Stock Connect Central SOE Dividend ETF Feeder C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_5hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_1", "prompt": "Among Guansheng Co., Ltd., Duolun Technology, Sungrow Power Supply, and Kingfa Sci. & Tech., on the three dates 2024-03-18, 2024-06-14, and 2025-03-26, which two companies ranked in the top two by average performance of main force net inflow, respectively? For these two companies, in the financial reports for the quarters corresponding to 2024-02-08, 2024-03-15, and 2024-11-12, which two dates ranked in the top two by average monetary funds, respectively? Of these two dates, on which date did Huabao CSI Intelligent Electric Vehicle ETF Connect A have a higher category-average 3-month return? In the single-quarter report corresponding to the date with the higher category-average 3-month return, between ST Luton and Shengjing Micro, which company had a smaller loss in net profit attributable to the parent (i.e., a larger value) and higher R&D expenses? On what date was that company's 2025 Q1 report released? On that date, among the five funds CATIC Opportunity Navigation Hybrid Initiated C, China Merchants Zhaocheng Semi-Annual Open Bond Initiated, China Universal CSI Main Consumer ETF Connect C, Yinhua CSI Photovoltaic Industry ETF Initiated Connect C, and Huabao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF, which fund had the highest return over the past 3 months?", "reference_response": "By the average performance of net inflow of main funds, the top two companies are Duolun Technology (average 560,912.36 yuan) and Guansheng Co., Ltd. (average -2,396,180.07 yuan), respectively; by the average performance of monetary funds, the top two days are 2024-02-08 (average 1011168274.57 yuan) and 2024-03-15 (average 1011168274.57 yuan), respectively; on 2024-02-08, the peer-category average three-month return rate was -0.1086%; on 2024-03-15, the peer-category average three-month return rate was 0.0157%. By comparison, the peer-category average three-month return rate on 2024-03-15 (0.0157%) was higher than that on 2024-02-08 (-0.1086%), so the return rate on 2024-03-15 was higher. In the first quarter of 2024 (Q1 single-quarter report), ST Luton (300555.SZ) had net profit attributable to the parent of -3.7116 million yuan and R&D expenses of 3.9989 million yuan; Shengjing Micro (603375.SH) had net profit attributable to the parent of -2.2842 million yuan and R&D expenses of 21.8846 million yuan. Shengjing Micro had a smaller net profit loss attributable to the parent (-2.2842 million yuan > -3.7116 million yuan) and higher R&D expenses (21.8846 million yuan > 3.9989 million yuan), so Shengjing Micro meets the conditions; Shengjing Micro's Q1 2025 report was released on April 29, 2025. ; On 2025-04-29, the returns over the past 3 months were -19.08% for AVIC Opportunity Navigation Hybrid Initiated C, 0.16% for China Merchants Zhaocheng Semiannual Fixed-Open Bond Initiated, 5.15% for China Universal CSI Major Consumption ETF Link C, -9.45% for Yinhua CSI Photovoltaic Industry ETF Initiated Link C, and 0.83% for HuaBao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF; the highest return over the past 3 months was for China Universal CSI Major Consumption ETF Link C, with the corresponding indicator value of approximately 5.15%.", "response_final_reference": "China Universal CSI Major Consumer ETF Feeder C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_10", "prompt": "Among the three funds Zhongyou Pure Bond Hengli Bond A, CEIBS Medical Health Hybrid C, and Huabao CSI 800 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link C, which two ranked in the top two by fund size from largest to smallest on 2025-08-07? Of these two funds, which one performed best based on the average of the category-average one-year return rate on the three dates 2024-07-25, 2025-07-29, and 2025-09-10? For that fund, among the three time points 2024-10-25, 2025-05-27, and 2025-08-14, which were the top two dates for average performance by return rate over the past 6 months, in order of the first and second highest? On those two dates, among Wanbond, Mega Chincal, Jinhe Biotech, and Hanwang Technology, which two companies ranked first and second by average performance in main force net inflow? Of those two companies, which had the higher net cash flow from operating activities in 2024 Q1 (single-quarter report)? On what date was that company's 2024 Q3 cumulative quarterly report released?", "reference_response": "On 2025-08-07, according to the fund basic information data: the fund size of China Post Pure Bond Hengli Bond A was 4.839 billion yuan, the fund size of Zhongou Healthcare Hybrid C was 15.976 billion yuan, and the fund size of HuaBao CSI 800 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link C was 0.027 billion yuan. Comparing by fund size percentile: Zhongou Healthcare Hybrid C had the largest size (percentile 0%), China Post Pure Bond Hengli Bond A was second (percentile 50%), and HuaBao CSI 800 Dividend Low Volatility ETF Link C was the smallest (percentile 100%). Therefore, the top two funds were Zhongou Healthcare Hybrid C and China Post Pure Bond Hengli Bond A. Zhongou Healthcare Hybrid C (2024-07-25: -0.1915% / 2025-07-29: 0.3230% / 2025-09-10: 0.5204%), China Post Pure Bond Hengli Bond A (2024-07-25: 0.0402% / 2025-07-29: 0.0222% / 2025-09-10: 0.0193%); calculated by arithmetic mean, the average one-year return of Zhongou Healthcare Hybrid C was 0.2173%, and that of China Post Pure Bond Hengli Bond A was 0.02723%, so the best-performing fund was Zhongou Healthcare Hybrid C. ; 2024-10-25: the return over the past 6 months was 6.15%; 2025-05-27: the return over the past 6 months was -1.02%; 2025-08-14: the return over the past 6 months was 25.48%. Ranking by 6-month return from high to low (higher ranks first), the top two dates were 2025-08-14 and 2024-10-25. ; Wbond (2025-08-14: -9651162.0, 2024-10-25: -6116814.76), Mega Ink Color (2025-08-14: 4507014.0, 2024-10-25: -2296388.75), Jinhe Biotech (2025-08-14: -30657286.0, 2024-10-25: -560201.0), Hanvon Technology (2025-08-14: -11958315.88, 2024-10-25: 1903498.0); calculated by the average value of main force net inflow: Mega Ink Color (1105312.625) > Hanvon Technology (-5027408.94) > Wbond (-7883988.38) > Jinhe Biotech (-15608743.5), and the top two were Mega Ink Color and Hanvon Technology. ; According to the financial report data for the first quarter of 2024 (Q1 single-quarter report): Mega Ink Color (603062.SH) had net cash flow from operating activities of -127,518,036.47 yuan, and Hanvon Technology (002362.SZ) had net cash flow from operating activities of -100,414,025.64 yuan. A higher net cash flow from operating activities indicates a better cash inflow situation. Hanvon Technology's -100,414,025.64 yuan was higher than Mega Ink Color's -127,518,036.47 yuan, therefore Hanvon Technology had a higher net cash flow from operating activities in the 2024 Q1 single-quarter report, and Hanvon Technology's 2024 Q3 cumulative quarterly report was released on 2025-10-31.", "response_final_reference": "October 31, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_11", "prompt": "For the two funds Ping An CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF and E Fund Hang Seng Tech ETF Feeder (QDII) C, on 2025-12-17, which fund belongs to a category whose peer average one-year return exceeds 0.24% and whose peer average two-year return exceeds 0.4%? For that fund, between Q2 2024 and full-year 2024, in which period was its return ranking better? On the last day of the quarter in the period when that fund’s return ranking was better, among the three companies Xianle Health, Sky Sea Defence, and Ping An Healthcare and Technology, which company had the highest main force net inflow? For that company, as of 2025-12-18, on what date was its first financial report of 2025 released? On that date, among the four funds China Post RuiLi Enhanced Bond, Golden Trust Sinatay Yuanqi Flexible Allocation Mixed, Great Wall Competitive Advantage Six-Month Holding Mixed A, and ChinaAMC Hong Kong Stock Connect Central SOE Dividend ETF Feeder C, which fund has a management fee rate below 1% and was established earlier than 2018? For that fund, between the two dates 2024-01-10 and 2024-09-18, on which date was its trailing one-year return higher?", "reference_response": "On 2025-12-17, the average one-year return of peers in the Index-Equity Fund category to which Ping An CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF belongs was 0.2410%, and the average two-year return was 0.4131%; the average one-year return of peers in the QDII-Equity Fund category to which E Fund Hang Seng Tech ETF Feeder (QDII) C belongs was 0.2380%, and the average two-year return was 0.4933%. Only the category to which Ping An CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF belongs simultaneously meets the conditions that the average peer one-year return exceeds 0.24% and the average peer two-year return exceeds 0.4%; Ping An CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF (Class A shares) ranked 81/2506 in return in Q2 2024 (percentile 3.23%), and 534/2974 in return for the full year 2024 (percentile 17.96%). A smaller percentile means a higher rank, so its return ranking was higher in Q2 2024; on 2024-06-30 (the actual trading day was 2024-06-28 due to the weekend market closure), Xiangle Health had a main fund net inflow of RMB 2.9727 million, Sky Sea Defense had a main fund net inflow of RMB 30.2818 million, and Ping An Good Doctor had a main fund net inflow of RMB -0.0755 million. Therefore, Sky Sea Defense had the highest main fund net inflow. As of 2025-12-18, the first time Sky Sea Defense released a financial report in 2025 was on 2025-04-26, when it released its Q1 2025 report; on 2025-04-26, the basic information of the four funds was as follows: China Post RuiLi Enhanced Bond (002474.OF) had a management fee rate of 0.8% and was established on August 25, 2016; Jinyuan Shunan Yuanqi Flexible Allocation Hybrid (004685.OF) had a management fee rate of 1.5% and was established on November 14, 2017; Great Wall Competitive Advantage Six-Month Holding Hybrid A (011455.OF) had a management fee rate of 1.2% and was established on July 13, 2021; ChinaAMC Hong Kong Stock Connect SOE Dividend ETF Feeder C (021143.OF) had a management fee rate of 0.5% and was established on April 16, 2024. Only China Post RuiLi Enhanced Bond simultaneously meets the conditions that the management fee rate is below 1% and the establishment date is earlier than 2018; on 2024-01-10, the past one-year return of China Post RuiLi Enhanced Bond was 1.027077%, and on 2024-09-18 it was -2.428058%; among these, the past one-year return on 2024-01-10 was higher.", "response_final_reference": "2024-01-10", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_12", "prompt": "What is the release date of Hailu Heavy Industry's 2025 Q2 single-quarter financial report? On that date, among the four funds Huabao CSI All Share Agriculture, Forestry, Animal Husbandry & Fishery ETF Initiated Link C, Southern Hang Seng Biotech ETF, ChinaAMC Hang Seng Biotech ETF, and Huabao CSI Intelligent Electric Vehicle ETF Initiated Link A, which two funds have the smallest fund sizes? Of those two funds, on 2025-07-14, which fund has the higher return over the past 6 months? For that fund, among 2024-08-05, 2024-09-06, and 2025-11-21, on which date did its category average 3-month return exceed 0% and its category average 6-month return exceed 0.1%? As of that date's cumulative quarterly reports, among the four companies Xinlai Applied Materials, Ruoyuchen, Zhuhai CosMX Battery, and Lopal Tech, which two companies rank lowest by percentile in the monetary funds indicator? Of those two companies, on 2025-08-21, which company has the higher turnover rate?", "reference_response": "The release date of Hailu Heavy Industry's 2025 Q2 single-quarter financial report was August 26, 2025. On August 26, 2025, ChinaAMC CSI Intelligent Electric Vehicle ETF Initiated Link A and ChinaAMC CSI All Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Fishery ETF Initiated Link C had the smallest fund sizes. On July 14, 2025, ChinaAMC CSI All Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Fishery ETF Initiated Link C had the higher return rate. For ChinaAMC CSI All Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Fishery ETF Initiated Link C, among 2024-08-05, 2024-09-06, and 2025-11-21, only 2025-11-21 satisfies the condition that the category average three-month return rate exceeds 0% and the category average six-month return rate exceeds 0.1%. In the corresponding cumulative Q3 quarterly report on November 21, 2025, among the four companies Sino-Clean Energy Materials, Ruoyuchen, Zhuhai CosMX Battery, and Lopal Tech, the two companies with the lowest monetary funds were Sino-Clean Energy Materials and Ruoyuchen. On 2025-08-21, Sino-Clean Energy Materials had a turnover rate of 9.00%, and Ruoyuchen had a turnover rate of 11.19%; the higher turnover rate was Ruoyuchen.", "response_final_reference": "Ruoyu Chen", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_13", "prompt": "Among the five companies Zhongke Xingtu, Air China, Shijing Technology, Jin Qilin, and Bolo Bao, on November 5, 2025, which company's change in the number of shareholders exceeded 10%? When did that company's subsidiary sign a strategic cooperation framework agreement with Changguang Satellite? Among the three funds Huaxia CSI Bank ETF Link C, HuaBao CSI Electronics 50 ETF Link C, and HuaBao CSI 500 Index Enhanced C, in the year the cooperation agreement was signed, which fund had the lowest return ranking percentile? For that fund, among the three dates 2024-11-19, 2024-12-18, and 2025-07-25, on which date was the return over the past 3 months the highest? In the corresponding quarterly report for the date on which that fund's return over the past 3 months was the highest, between S*ST Giti and Zhongchi Co., Ltd., which company had the highest net profit attributable to the parent company? On what date was that company's cumulative financial report for the third quarter of 2023 released?", "reference_response": "As of November 5, 2025, according to the most recently disclosed data on changes in shareholder numbers:\\n- Geovis Technology's shareholder count changed by 18.46% (increase)\\n- Air China Limited's shareholder count changed by -0.12% (decrease)\\n- Scientech Innovation's shareholder count changed by 3.34% (increase)\\n- Golden Kirin's shareholder count changed by 7.99% (increase)\\n- BLSW's shareholder count changed by -0.4% (decrease).\\nOnly Geovis Technology had a shareholder count change exceeding 10%, meeting the condition. A subsidiary of Geovis Technology signed a strategic cooperation framework agreement with Chang Guang Satellite on January 29, 2024; in 2023, ChinaAMC CSI Bank ETF Feeder C had a return ranking of 637 (out of 2,226 funds in the same category), percentile = 637/2226≈28.62%; HWABAO CSI Electronics 50 ETF Feeder C had a return ranking of 320 (out of 2,226 funds in the same category), percentile = 320/2226≈14.38%; HWABAO CSI 500 Index Enhanced C had a return ranking of 200 (out of 499 funds in the same category), percentile = 200/499≈40.08%. A lower percentile indicates a higher ranking, so HWABAO CSI Electronics 50 ETF Feeder C had the lowest percentile and performed best.; 2024-12-18, because:\\n- 2024-11-19: return over the past 3 months was 28.725178%\\n- 2024-12-18: return over the past 3 months was 36.521881%\\n- 2025-07-25: return over the past 3 months was 12.022263%\\nAmong these, 2024-12-18 had the highest return over the past 3 months, reaching 36.521881%.; In the Q4 single-quarter report corresponding to December 18, 2024, S Jia Tong's net profit attributable to the parent was 17,935,041.14 yuan, and Sinoholding's net profit attributable to the parent was -114,610,688.23 yuan. Therefore, S Jia Tong had the highest net profit attributable to the parent.; S Jia Tong's cumulative financial report for the third quarter of 2023 was released on October 30, 2024", "response_final_reference": "October 30, 2024", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_14", "prompt": "As of December 18, 2025, on what date did Wanhua Chemical first release a financial report in 2025? On the date when Wanhua Chemical first released a financial report in 2025, among the five funds Huabao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF Initiated Link A, ChinaAMC Yongfu Hybrid A, Huabao CSI Segmented Chemical Industry Theme ETF Link A, Ping An CSI Interbank Certificate of Deposit AAA Index 7-Day Holding Period, and China Universal Hong Kong Advantage Select Hybrid (QDII) C, which fund had the smallest return ranking percentile (i.e., the highest ranking) for the full year of 2024? For the fund with the smallest return ranking percentile in the previous question, among the three dates 2025-03-12, 2025-07-08, and 2025-07-21, on which date did its nearly 3-month return first exceed 1%? In the semiannual report ending on the date when the nearly 3-month return first exceeded 1%, among Wencan Co., Ltd., Jialitu, and China Film, which company had the highest gross profit margin? For the company with the highest gross profit margin in the previous question, what is its sector/industry?", "reference_response": "Wanhua Chemical first released a financial report in 2025 on April 15, 2025, and it was the Q1 2025 report (single-quarter Q1 report); the percentile calculation results for full-year 2024 return rankings are as follows: Huabao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF Initiated Link A ranked 1997 (among 2974 funds in the same category, percentile = 1997/2974≈0.6715), ChinaAMC Yongfu Hybrid A ranked 333 (among 1810 funds in the same category, percentile = 333/1810≈0.1840), Huabao CSI Segmented Chemical Industry Theme ETF Link A ranked 2342 (among 2974 funds in the same category, percentile = 2342/2974≈0.7875), Ping An CSI Interbank Certificate of Deposit AAA Index 7-Day Holding Period ranked 38 (among 91 funds in the same category, percentile = 38/91≈0.4176), and China Universal Hong Kong Advantage Select Hybrid (QDII) C ranked 131 (among 140 funds in the same category, percentile = 131/140≈0.9357). Among them, ChinaAMC Yongfu Hybrid A has the smallest percentile (0.1840), indicating that its return ranking is the most advanced. On 2025-03-12, the return rate over the past 3 months was 0.90%, below 1%; on 2025-07-08, the return rate over the past 3 months was 2.72%, exceeding 1% for the first time; on 2025-07-21, the return rate over the past 3 months was 0.65%, below 1%. Therefore, the first time it exceeded 1% was on 2025-07-08. In the corresponding semiannual report on 2025-07-08 (with statistics ending on June 30, 2025), Wencan Co., Ltd.'s gross sales margin was 13.39%, Jialitu's gross sales margin was 16.92%, and China Film's gross sales margin was 5.44%. Among them, Jialitu had the highest gross sales margin, reaching 16.92%, and Jialitu's sector/industry is machinery equipment.", "response_final_reference": "Machinery and Equipment", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_15", "prompt": "For the fund category to which Ping An CSI Hong Kong Healthcare ETF Feeder C belongs, on which date did the category average one-year return first exceed 0% between 2024-08-09 and 2025-08-11? On the date when the category average one-year return first exceeded 0%, among Xuguang Electronics, Hunan Baiyin, and Yingjia Gongjiu, which two companies had the highest margin financing and securities lending balance difference? For those two companies, among the corresponding quarterly financial reports on 2024-01-16, 2024-02-14, 2024-05-09, and 2025-07-28, when ranked by average net profit margin on sales, which were the top two dates, respectively? Of those two dates, on which date was the category average one-year return of Huaan Securities Ruiying One-Year Holding A higher? On the date when the category average one-year return was higher, between Zhongcheng Technology and China Pacific Insurance, which company simultaneously satisfied a turnover rate below 0.4% and trading volume exceeding 20 million shares? On what date was that company's 2024 third-quarter single-quarter report released?", "reference_response": "According to the data: the peer average one-year return on 2024-08-09 was -0.1860% (below 0%), and the peer average one-year return on 2025-08-11 was 0.3710% (above 0%). Therefore, the first time it exceeded 0% was on 2025-08-11; on 2025-08-11, Xuguang Electronics had a margin trading and securities lending balance difference of 668,849,537 yuan, Hunan Baiyin had a margin trading and securities lending balance difference of 511,980,191 yuan, and Yingjia Gongjiu had a margin trading and securities lending balance difference of 246,323,565 yuan. Comparing by percentile rank (the higher, the closer to the front), Xuguang Electronics had a percentile of 0% (highest), Hunan Baiyin had a percentile of 50%, and Yingjia Gongjiu had a percentile of 100% (lowest). The top two companies were Xuguang Electronics and Hunan Baiyin; 2025-07-28 (Hunan Baiyin 1.85% / Xuguang Electronics 8.10%), 2024-05-09 (Hunan Baiyin 1.74% / Xuguang Electronics 6.79%); calculated by equal-weight average, the composite scores were: 4.975% for 2025-07-28, 4.265% for 2024-05-09, 3.415% for 2024-01-16, and 3.415% for 2024-02-14. A higher net profit margin on sales is better, so the top two dates were 2025-07-28 and 2024-05-09; the peer average one-year return on 2024-05-09 was 0.0389%, and the peer average one-year return on 2025-07-28 was 0.0236%. Therefore, the peer average one-year return was higher on 2024-05-09; on 2024-05-09, Zhongcheng Technology had a turnover rate of 4.27% and a trading volume of 1,505,200 shares; China Pacific Insurance had a turnover rate of 0.39% (below 0.4%) and a trading volume of 26.8007 million shares (above 20 million shares). Therefore, only China Pacific Insurance simultaneously met the conditions of a turnover rate below 0.4% and a trading volume above 20 million shares.; China Pacific Insurance's 2024 third-quarter single-quarter report was released on 2025-10-31", "response_final_reference": "October 31, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_16", "prompt": "Among the three companies YTAI Energy, Mengguli, and Jiejie Microelectronics, in the single-quarter reports for the quarter they belonged to on 2024-01-25, which company had net profit attributable to the parent exceeding 100 million yuan and basic earnings per share below 0.03 yuan? For the company selected in the previous step, in the quarterly financial reports corresponding to the three dates 2024-05-06 (corresponding to the first-quarter single-quarter report), 2024-11-14 (corresponding to the third-quarter cumulative quarterly report), and 2025-09-11 (corresponding to the third-quarter cumulative quarterly report), when did the year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent first fall below 0%? On the date when the year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent first fell below 0%, among the four funds Guoshou Ampao Target Date 2030 Three-Year Holding Hybrid Initiated (FOF) Y, E Fund CSI Wind M&A and Restructuring Index (LOF), China Merchants Enhanced Dual Bond Bond I, and HuaBao CSI 500 Index Enhanced C, which fund had a return over the past 1 month below 1% and a return over the past 3 months exceeding 10%? For the peer group of the fund selected in the previous step (Hybrid - Flexible), among 2024-07-15, 2024-08-23, 2024-09-10, and 2025-02-12, on which date was the peer-group average three-month return below -0.08%, the peer-group average six-month return below 0%, and the peer-group average one-year return below -0.14%? On the date identified in the previous step, between Sito Bio and Kexuan Power Holdings, which company had net main-force inflow greater than 0 and the proportion of main-force inflow greater than 5%? What is the sector/industry of the company selected in the previous step?", "reference_response": "In the Q1 single-quarter report corresponding to January 25, 2024, Yongtai Energy's net profit attributable to the parent was 467 million yuan, and basic earnings per share was 0.02 yuan, meeting the conditions of net profit attributable to the parent exceeding 100 million yuan and basic earnings per share being below 0.03 yuan; Mengguli's net profit attributable to the parent was 2.9653 million yuan, and basic earnings per share was 0.01 yuan; Jiejie Microelectronics' net profit attributable to the parent was 91.9505 million yuan, and basic earnings per share was 0.13 yuan, which does not meet the conditions. For Yongtai Energy, on 2024-05-06 (corresponding to the first-quarter single-quarter report), the year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent was 11.41%, higher than 0%; on 2024-11-14 (corresponding to the cumulative third-quarter report), the year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent was -9.85%, falling below 0% for the first time; on 2025-09-11 (corresponding to the cumulative third-quarter report), the year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent was -86.48%, below 0%. Therefore, the first time the year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent fell below 0% was 2024-11-14; on November 14, 2024, Guoshou Ampao Target Date 2030 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF) Y had a return of 0.20722% over the past 1 month and 11.531925% over the past 3 months; E Fund CSI Wind M&A Restructuring Index (LOF) had a return of 13.821954% over the past 1 month and 42.420436% over the past 3 months; China Merchants Enhanced Dual Bond Bond I had a return of 0.300013% over the past 1 month and 0.3769% over the past 3 months; HuaBao CSI 500 Enhanced Index C had a return of 5.94041% over the past 1 month and 24.690411% over the past 3 months. Only Guoshou Ampao Target Date 2030 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF) Y simultaneously meets the conditions of a return over the past 1 month below 1% and a return over the past 3 months above 10%.; 2024-09-10 meets the conditions. The specific data are as follows:\n- 2024-07-15: the category average three-month return was -0.0184% (not lower than -0.08%), the category average six-month return was 0.0038% (not lower than 0%), and the category average one-year return was -0.1260% (not lower than -0.14%).\n- 2024-08-23: the category average three-month return was -0.0870% (lower than -0.08%), the category average six-month return was -0.0456% (lower than 0%), and the category average one-year return was -0.1168% (not lower than -0.14%).\n- 2024-09-10: the category average three-month return was -0.0883% (lower than -0.08%), the category average six-month return was -0.0854% (lower than 0%), and the category average one-year return was -0.1412% (lower than -0.14%).\n- 2025-02-12: the category average three-month return was -0.0046% (not lower than -0.08%), the category average six-month return was 0.1625% (not lower than 0%), and the category average one-year return was 0.1621% (not lower than -0.14%).\nTherefore, only 2024-09-10 simultaneously satisfies all three conditions. ; On 2024-09-10, Sito Bio's main-force net inflow was 4.9741 million yuan, and the proportion of main-force inflow was 9.0%; Kexuan Power Holdings' main-force net inflow was 0 yuan, and the proportion of main-force inflow was 0%. Only Sito Bio meets the conditions that main-force net inflow is greater than 0 and the proportion of main-force inflow is greater than 5%. ; Sito Bio's sector/industry is pharmaceuticals and biotechnology (primary industry) and chemical pharmaceuticals (secondary industry).", "response_final_reference": "Scoring standard for Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology (Level-1 industry) and Chemical Pharmaceuticals (Level-2 industry): answering either one correctly is sufficient", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_17", "prompt": "What are the release dates of all financial reports for Southern Media in fiscal year 2024? Among all the release dates of Southern Media's financial reports in fiscal year 2024, on which date did E Fund Hang Seng Tech ETF Feeder (QDII) C have an average one-month return for its peer funds below 0% and a three-month return above 0.1%? In the corresponding cumulative quarterly report on that date, between Kemeite Gas and Mango Excellent Media, which company had net profit attributable to the parent greater than 0 and basic earnings per share greater than 0? For that company, between 2024-11-26 and 2025-07-03, on which date did the trading amount exceed 500 million yuan and the turnover rate exceed 2%? On that date, between the two funds E Fund Artificial Intelligence ETF Feeder C and Wanjia Zhixuan Mixed A, which fund had a management fee rate below 0.2% and a custodian fee rate below 0.1%? For that fund, among 2025-04-21, 2025-05-19, 2025-07-04, and 2025-09-25, which two dates had the highest returns over the past 3 months?", "reference_response": "Southern Media released four financial reports for fiscal year 2024, with publication dates of August 29, 2024 (interim report), October 30, 2024 (cumulative Q3 quarterly report), April 26, 2025 (single-quarter Q1 report), and April 26, 2025 (annual report). Among all the publication dates of Southern Media's fiscal year 2024 financial reports, only 2024-10-30 meets the condition that the average one-month return of funds in the same category as E Fund Hang Seng Tech ETF Link (QDII) C is below 0% and the three-month return is above 0.1%. In the cumulative quarterly report corresponding to 2024-10-30, Kemeite Gas had net profit attributable to the parent of -33,282,400.76 yuan and basic earnings per share of -0.05 yuan, while Mango Excellent Media had net profit attributable to the parent of 1,444,347,079.5 yuan and basic earnings per share of 0.77 yuan. Only Mango Excellent Media simultaneously satisfies the conditions of net profit attributable to the parent greater than 0 and basic earnings per share greater than 0. On 2024-11-26, Mango Excellent Media had a trading amount of 853 million yuan and a turnover rate of 2.89%; on 2025-07-03, the trading amount was 199 million yuan and the turnover rate was 0.90%. Only 2024-11-26 satisfies the condition that the trading amount exceeds 500 million yuan and the turnover rate is above 2%. Data on 2024-11-26 show that E Fund Artificial Intelligence ETF Link C had a management fee rate of 0.15% and a custody fee rate of 0.05%; Wanjia Zhenxuan Hybrid A had a management fee rate of 1.2% and a custody fee rate of 0.2%. Only E Fund Artificial Intelligence ETF Link C simultaneously satisfies the conditions of a management fee rate below 0.2% and a custody fee rate below 0.1%. The return over the past 3 months was -0.752% on 2025-04-21, -11.140% on 2025-05-19, 1.144% on 2025-07-04, and 60.403% on 2025-09-25. Comparing by percentile rank (the smaller the percentile, the higher the ranking), the highest is 2025-09-25 (percentile 0), followed by 2025-07-04 (percentile 0.333).", "response_final_reference": "September 25, 2025, followed by July 4, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_18", "prompt": "Among the three funds Huabao CSI 800 Real Estate ETF, CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy, and Huabao CSI Electronic 50 ETF Feeder C, as of 2025-01-17, which two funds had the highest returns over the past 3 months? Among these two funds, which fund had the larger fund size on 2025-01-28? For that fund, among the three dates 2024-07-11, 2024-09-18, and 2024-10-08, based on the average performance of the category-average 3-month return, which were the top two dates, respectively? Among those two dates, for Huhua Holdings, Lily & Beauty, and Jintou Chengkai, based on average performance by trading volume (mean percentile), which were the top two companies, respectively? Of these two companies, on April 30, 2025, which company had a main force net inflow exceeding RMB 2.5 million and a main force inflow ratio exceeding 15%? On what date was that company's Medog branch established?", "reference_response": "On 2025-01-17, the 3-month return of Huabao CSI 800 Real Estate ETF was -7.804292%, the 3-month return of CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy was 9.81348%, and the 3-month return of Huabao CSI Electronic 50 ETF Link C was 8.656447%; comparing by percentile (the higher the return, the higher the ranking), the top two funds are CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy (1st percentile) and Huabao CSI Electronic 50 ETF Link C (2nd percentile); on 2025-01-28, the fund size of CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy was 1.133 billion yuan, and the fund size of Huabao CSI Electronic 50 ETF Link C was 18.813 million yuan; comparing by percentile, for the fund size metric, the higher the value, the higher the ranking, CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy had a percentile of 100%, and Huabao CSI Electronic 50 ETF Link C had a percentile of 0%, therefore the fund with the largest size is CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy, 2024-07-11 (average 3-month return of the peer category 0.0019%), 2024-09-18 (average 3-month return of the peer category -0.0107%), 2024-10-08 (average 3-month return of the peer category -0.0230%); calculated by the mean percentile (for a single entity only, this is the value itself), the higher the return, the higher the ranking, and the top two are 2024-07-11 (0.0019%) and 2024-09-18 (-0.0107%); Huhua Shares (2024-07-11: 1,511,800 shares / 2024-09-18: 4,171,400 shares), Liren Lizhuang (2024-07-11: 4,788,800 shares / 2024-09-18: 5,738,500 shares), Jintou Chengkai (2024-07-11: 16,788,500 shares / 2024-09-18: 33,164,600 shares); calculated by mean percentile: Huhua Shares had a mean percentile of 0 (ranked 1st), Liren Lizhuang had a mean percentile of 0.5 (ranked 2nd), and Jintou Chengkai had a mean percentile of 1 (ranked 3rd), so the top two are Huhua Shares and Liren Lizhuang; on May 5, 2025 (actually using data from the most recent trading day, April 30, 2025), Huhua Shares had a main-force net inflow of 2.7233 million yuan, with the main-force inflow accounting for 20.0%; Liren Lizhuang had a main-force net inflow of 2.4294 million yuan, with the main-force inflow accounting for 9.0%. Only Huhua Shares simultaneously satisfies the conditions that the main-force net inflow exceeds 2.5 million yuan (2.7233 million yuan > 2.5 million yuan) and the main-force inflow ratio exceeds 15% (20.0% > 15%); Huhua Shares established the Medog Branch on 2024-07-18.", "response_final_reference": "45491", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_19", "prompt": "For the peer average one-year return rate of the fund category to which Morgan Minsheng Demand Equity A belongs, on which date did it first exceed 0.1% between 2024-10-22 and 2025-11-11? On the date determined in the first step, among Jinli Permanent Magnet, Great Wall Motor-R, and Shenzhen Huaqiang, which company had the highest trading volume? For the company with the highest trading volume in the second step, what was the release date of its 2024 semiannual report? On the semiannual report release date determined in the third step, among the three funds—Southern Fund CSOP Saudi Arabia ETF, Huatai-PineBridge CSOP Saudi Arabia ETF, and Guotai Shuangli Bond A—which fund had the highest daily growth rate of adjusted unit NAV? For the bond fund category - long-term pure bond to which the fund with the highest daily growth rate of adjusted unit NAV in the fourth step belongs, between 2024-04-01 and 2025-07-25, on which date were both the one-week return rate and the one-month return rate less than 0%? In the quarterly report corresponding to the date determined in the fifth step, between Gaolan Co., Ltd. and Conny Mechanical & Electrical, which company had a positive net cash flow from operating activities and net cash flow from investing activities greater than -10 million yuan?", "reference_response": "On 2024-10-22, the category average one-year return was 0.0644%, below 0.1%; on 2025-11-11, the category average one-year return was 0.2399%, exceeding 0.1%. Therefore, the first time it exceeded 0.1% was 2025-11-11; on 2025-11-11, Jinli Permanent Magnet had a trading volume of 33,029,200 shares, Great Wall Motor-R had a trading volume of 0 shares, and Shenzhen Huaqiang had a trading volume of 10,238,200 shares, among which Jinli Permanent Magnet had the highest trading volume.;The corresponding semiannual report release date for Jinli Permanent Magnet on 2024-04-18 was 2024-08-29, and the corresponding semiannual report release date on 2024-06-04 was also 2024-08-29. Based on the semiannual report data, the release date is uniformly 2024-08-29.;On 2024-08-29, the daily growth rate of the adjusted unit NAV of CSOP Saudi Arabia ETF (159329.SZ) under Southern Fund was 0.3%, that of Huatai-PineBridge CSOP Saudi Arabia ETF (520830.SH) was 0.31%, and that of Guotai Shuangli Bond A (020019.OF) was 0.65%. Therefore, Guotai Shuangli Bond A had the highest daily growth rate.;2025-07-25, because on that day, the category average one-week return was -0.0029% (less than 0%), and the category average one-month return was -0.0012% (less than 0%); whereas on 2024-04-01, the category average one-week return was 0.0009% (greater than 0%), and the category average one-month return was 0.0021% (greater than 0%). Therefore, only 2025-07-25 satisfies the condition that both the one-week return and the one-month return are less than 0% at the same time.;According to the single-quarter report for Q3 2025 (statistical cutoff date: 2025-09-30): Golan Co., Ltd. had net cash flow from operating activities of 37.238 million yuan (positive), and net cash flow from investing activities of -7.506 million yuan (greater than -10 million yuan); Connie Electromechanical had net cash flow from operating activities of -11.233 million yuan (negative), and net cash flow from investing activities of -166.394 million yuan (less than -10 million yuan). Only Golan Co., Ltd. simultaneously satisfies the conditions that net cash flow from operating activities is positive and net cash flow from investing activities is greater than -10 million yuan.", "response_final_reference": "Gaolan Co., Ltd.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_2", "prompt": "When wasShanghai Auntie listed? On the day it was listed, among the three funds China Merchants Dual Bond Enhanced Bond E, CCB Hong Kong Stock Connect Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF, and Penghua Zunhe One-Year Regularly Open-Ended Initiated Bond, which two ranked in the top two by fund size from largest to smallest? Of those two funds, on 2024-11-07, which one had the highest return over the past 3 months? For that fund, between the two points in time of the end of 2023 and the end of 2024, at which point did the fund's rise/fall rate first exceed 10%? On the day it first exceeded 10%, among Bank of China, Xinghua New Materials, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings, and Sunway Communication, which two companies had the highest margin financing balances? Of those two companies, in the cumulative report as of 2024-08-09, which company had the higher total shareholders' equity?", "reference_response": "Shanghai Auntie was listed on the Hong Kong stock market on May 8, 2025; on 2025-05-08, the fund size of China Merchants Double Bond Enhanced Bond E (code: 003297.OF) was RMB 379 million, the fund size of CCB Southbound Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF (code: 159960.SZ) was RMB 523 million, and the fund size of Penghua Zunhe One-Year Regular Open-Ended Initiated Bond (code: 011080.OF) was RMB 9.709 billion. Comparing by fund size percentile (the smaller the percentile, the higher the rank): Penghua Zunhe One-Year Regular Open-Ended Initiated Bond had the largest size (percentile 0.167), CCB Southbound Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF was second (percentile 0.5), and China Merchants Double Bond Enhanced Bond E was the smallest (percentile 0.833). Therefore, the top two are Penghua Zunhe One-Year Regular Open-Ended Initiated Bond and CCB Southbound Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF.;On 2024-11-07, the past 3-month return of Penghua Zunhe One-Year Regular Open-Ended Initiated Bond was -0.046011%, and the past 3-month return of CCB Southbound Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF was 27.241715%. Therefore, CCB Southbound Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF had the highest past 3-month return.;According to the fund performance data: at the end of 2023, the fund's rise/fall was -25.58%, below 10%; at the end of 2024, the rise/fall was 22.8%, exceeding 10%. Therefore, the first time it exceeded 10% was at the end of 2024.;On December 31, 2024, the margin financing balance of Bank of China was RMB 1,301,242,516, that of Xinghua New Materials was RMB 71,803,308, that of COSCO SHIPPING Holdings was RMB 4,545,969,924, and that of Mingyang Circuit was RMB 290,579,431; ranked by margin financing balance percentile from high to low, the top two were COSCO SHIPPING Holdings (highest percentile) and Bank of China (second-highest percentile).;In the semiannual report corresponding to August 9, 2024 (statistics as of June 30, 2024), COSCO SHIPPING Holdings had total shareholders' equity of RMB 257.430 billion, and Bank of China had total shareholders' equity of RMB 2,778.976 billion. Comparing by percentile (the higher the value, the higher the rank), Bank of China ranked No. 1 in total shareholders' equity.", "response_final_reference": "Bank of China", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_20", "prompt": "What are the release dates of all financial reports for Southern Media in fiscal year 2024? Among all the release dates of Southern Media's financial reports in fiscal year 2024, on which date did E Fund Hang Seng Tech ETF Feeder (QDII) C have an average one-month return for its peer funds below 0% and a three-month return above 0.1%? In the corresponding cumulative quarterly report on that date, between Kemeite Gas and Mango Excellent Media, which company had net profit attributable to the parent greater than 0 and basic earnings per share greater than 0? For that company, between 2024-11-26 and 2025-07-03, on which date did the trading amount exceed 500 million yuan and the turnover rate exceed 2%? On that date, between the two funds E Fund Artificial Intelligence ETF Feeder C and Wanjia Zhixuan Mixed A, which fund had a management fee rate below 0.2% and a custodian fee rate below 0.1%? For that fund, among 2025-04-21, 2025-05-19, 2025-07-04, and 2025-09-25, which two dates had the highest returns over the past 3 months?", "reference_response": "Southern Media released four financial reports for fiscal year 2024, with publication dates of August 29, 2024 (interim report), October 30, 2024 (cumulative Q3 quarterly report), April 26, 2025 (single-quarter Q1 report), and April 26, 2025 (annual report). Among all the publication dates of Southern Media's fiscal year 2024 financial reports, only 2024-10-30 meets the condition that the average one-month return of funds in the same category as E Fund Hang Seng Tech ETF Link (QDII) C is below 0% and the three-month return is above 0.1%. In the cumulative quarterly report corresponding to 2024-10-30, Kemeite Gas had net profit attributable to the parent of -33,282,400.76 yuan and basic earnings per share of -0.05 yuan, while Mango Excellent Media had net profit attributable to the parent of 1,444,347,079.5 yuan and basic earnings per share of 0.77 yuan. Only Mango Excellent Media simultaneously satisfies the conditions of net profit attributable to the parent greater than 0 and basic earnings per share greater than 0. On 2024-11-26, Mango Excellent Media had a trading amount of 853 million yuan and a turnover rate of 2.89%; on 2025-07-03, the trading amount was 199 million yuan and the turnover rate was 0.90%. Only 2024-11-26 satisfies the condition that the trading amount exceeds 500 million yuan and the turnover rate is above 2%. Data on 2024-11-26 show that E Fund Artificial Intelligence ETF Link C had a management fee rate of 0.15% and a custody fee rate of 0.05%; Wanjia Zhenxuan Hybrid A had a management fee rate of 1.2% and a custody fee rate of 0.2%. Only E Fund Artificial Intelligence ETF Link C simultaneously satisfies the conditions of a management fee rate below 0.2% and a custody fee rate below 0.1%. The return over the past 3 months was -0.752% on 2025-04-21, -11.140% on 2025-05-19, 1.144% on 2025-07-04, and 60.403% on 2025-09-25. Comparing by percentile rank (the smaller the percentile, the higher the ranking), the highest is 2025-09-25 (percentile 0), followed by 2025-07-04 (percentile 0.333).", "response_final_reference": "September 25, 2025, followed by July 4, 2025", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_3", "prompt": "Among the three funds Huabao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF, Dividend ETF, and Zhongtai Anyi Interest Rate Bond Bond C, on 2024-05-27, which fund had a positive return over the past week and a return of less than 1% over the past 3 months? For that fund, as of 2025-12-18, in which months did all the major monetary policy operations in 2025 that affected it occur? In the quarterly financial reports ending respectively on the 1st day of the second month, the 27th day of the fifth month, and the 29th day of the sixth month, on which date did Huafeng Technology have the highest year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company? On the date with the highest year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company, between the two funds Yinhua Integrated Circuit Hybrid C and Ping An CSI Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF Initiated Link A, which fund had the higher return over the past 3 months? How did that fund perform in terms of return over the past 3 months on 2025-09-18? In that fund's basic information on 2024-02-16, what was the fund size?", "reference_response": "Data as of 2024-05-27 show: the Huabao CSI Nonferrous Metals ETF had a return of -5.347747% over the past week and 16.427395% over the past 3 months; the Dividend ETF had a return of 0.728140% over the past week and 6.124291% over the past 3 months; Zhongtai Anyi Interest Rate Bond Bond C had a return of 0.038945% over the past week and 0.863846% over the past 3 months. Only Zhongtai Anyi Interest Rate Bond Bond C simultaneously satisfies the conditions of a positive return over the past week (0.038945% > 0) and a return below 1% over the past 3 months (0.863846% < 1%); as of 2025-12-18, the months in which all major monetary policy operations affecting Zhongtai Anyi Interest Rate Bond Bond C occurred in 2025 were February 2025 (RRR cut), May 2025 (RRR cut), June 2025 (reverse repo), July 2025 (new temporary instrument established), August 2025 (government bond trading), and October 2025 (government bond trading and creation of a new instrument); in the Q1 single-quarter report corresponding to 2025-05-01, Huafeng Technology's year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company was 207.17%; in the interim report corresponding to 2025-08-27, the year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company was 940.64%; in the cumulative Q3 quarterly report corresponding to 2025-10-29, the year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company was 558.51%. Therefore, the interim report corresponding to 2025-08-27 had the highest year-on-year growth rate of net profit attributable to the parent company; on 2025-08-27, Ping An CSI Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF Initiated Linked A had a return of 42.39% over the past 3 months, and Yinhua Integrated Circuit Hybrid C had a return of 24.65% over the past 3 months. Comparing by percentile (the higher the return, the smaller the percentile), Ping An CSI Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF Initiated Linked A ranked 1st (percentile 0%), and Yinhua Integrated Circuit Hybrid C ranked 2nd (percentile 100%). Therefore, the fund with the higher return over the past 3 months is Ping An CSI Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF Initiated Linked A. According to data as of 2025-09-18: Ping An CSI Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF Initiated Linked A (code: 023384.OF) had a return of 51.24% over the past 3 months. Since only one entity participated in the comparison, its composite score, calculated by the mean percentile method (i.e., the indicator itself), was 51.24%, ranking first. Details of other indicators: unit NAV RMB 1.5113, cumulative unit NAV RMB 1.5113, daily growth rate of adjusted unit NAV 0.19%, return over the past week 1.16%, return over the past 1 month 19.70%.; According to data as of 2024-02-16, the fund size of Ping An CSI Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF Initiated Linked A Fund (code: 023384.OF) was RMB 38,825,604.78. This fund is an index equity fund, managed by fund manager Liu Jieqian, under Ping An Fund Management Co., Ltd., and custodied by Bank of Communications Co., Ltd. Scoring standard: accurate to RMB 38,800,000.", "response_final_reference": "RMB 38,825,604.78 Scoring criteria: accurate to RMB 38,800,000.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_4", "prompt": "On July 31, 2025, between Sugon and Postal Savings Bank of China, which company had a financing balance exceeding 5 billion yuan and a negative net financing purchase? On what date did that company first release its financial report in 2024? On that date, between the two funds, Harvest CSI Rare Earth Industry ETF Feeder C and Ping An CSI Photovoltaic Industry ETF, which fund had the highest return over the past 3 months? For that fund, among the three time points 2024-08-27, 2025-06-16, and 2025-10-31, at which two time points did its return over the past 6 months rank highest by percentile? Among those two time points, when did Xinyi Solar's main net inflow (net inflow of large orders) first exceed HK$10 million? On the day it first exceeded HK$10 million, among the four funds China Merchants Enhanced Dual Debt Bond D, E Fund S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (QDII-LOF) A, Morgan Stanley Digital Economy Mixed C, and Huaan CSI Securities Companies, which fund had the highest return over the past year?", "reference_response": "On July 31, 2025, Sugon Information Industry Co., Ltd. had a margin financing balance of 6,626,839,820 yuan (about 6.627 billion yuan), and net margin financing purchases of -25,232,932 yuan; Postal Savings Bank of China had a margin financing balance of 1,060,982,061 yuan (about 1.061 billion yuan), and net margin financing purchases of -30,528,777 yuan. Only Sugon Information Industry Co., Ltd. simultaneously meets the conditions of a margin financing balance exceeding 5 billion yuan and negative net margin financing purchases. The first time Sugon Information Industry Co., Ltd. released a financial report in 2024 was April 26, 2024, when it released the Q1 2024 report. On April 26, 2024, the nearly 3-month return of Harvest CSI Rare Earth Industry ETF Link C was 7.362655%, and the nearly 3-month return of Ping An CSI Photovoltaic Industry ETF was -6.459904%. Therefore, Harvest CSI Rare Earth Industry ETF Link C had the highest nearly 3-month return; the nearly 6-month return on 2024-08-27 was -9.99527%, the nearly 6-month return on 2025-06-16 was 9.525062491777%, and the nearly 6-month return on 2025-10-31 was 69.935863174773%. Comparing by percentile ranking (the smaller the percentile, the higher the rank): the percentile on 2025-10-31 was 0% (highest), the percentile on 2025-06-16 was 50% (second highest), and the percentile on 2024-08-27 was 100%. Therefore, the top two dates are 2025-10-31 and 2025-06-16. On 2025-06-16, the main net inflow was HK$10,735,180 (exceeding HK$10 million), while on 2025-10-31, the main net inflow was HK$-3,136,480 (not exceeding HK$10 million). Therefore, the first time it exceeded HK$10 million was 2025-06-16; on 2025-06-16, the past one-year return of China Merchants Double Bond Enhanced Bond D was 3.34%, E Fund S&P Biotechnology Index (QDII-LOF) A was -8.68%, Morgan Stanley Digital Economy Mixed C was 26.96%, and Hua'an CSI Securities Company was 28.49%; among them, Hua'an CSI Securities Company had the highest past one-year return, reaching 28.49%.", "response_final_reference": "Huaan CSI Securities Companies", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_5", "prompt": "Among the three companies Kelun Electronics, Three Gorges Energy, and Shanghai Construction Group, in the single-quarter report for Q1 2025, which company had positive net profit attributable to the parent, positive basic earnings per share, and operating profit of less than RMB 1 billion? For that company, among the single-quarter report for Q1 corresponding to 2024-04-17, the semiannual report as of the query date 2024-09-09, the single-quarter report for Q1 as of the query date 2025-04-22, and the single-quarter report for Q2 as of the query date 2025-06-16, which two reporting periods had the highest rankings by quantile for net cash flow from operating activities? On the dates corresponding to those two reporting periods, on which day did Penghua Carbon Neutral Theme Hybrid A have a return since inception greater than 0% and a return over the past 6 months greater than 0%? On that day, among the five companies *ST Aowei, Shaanxi Coal Industry, Huhua Co., Ltd., Dengyun Co., Ltd., and Aerospace Electric Appliances, which company had the highest turnover rate? For that company, among the quarterly financial reports corresponding to 2024-01-11, 2024-02-02, and 2025-01-07, on which date did the quarterly financial report show total operating revenue of less than RMB 30 million and a negative gross profit margin on sales? On that date, among the five funds Harvest CSI 300 ETF Link (LOF) C, China Merchants CSI Liquor Index C, China Universal Hong Kong Advantage Selected Hybrid (QDII) C, HuaBao CSI Fine Chemical Industry Theme ETF Link A, and HuaBao CSI Technology Leaders ETF, which fund was established earlier than 2020 and had a management fee rate lower than 0.2%?", "reference_response": "According to the single-quarter report data for Q1 2025: Kedali Electronics: net profit attributable to parent was RMB 67.4509 million (positive), basic earnings per share was RMB 0.04 (positive), and operating profit was RMB 82.3557 million (below RMB 1 billion); Three Gorges Energy: net profit attributable to parent was RMB 2.447 billion (positive), basic earnings per share was RMB 0.09 (positive), and operating profit was RMB 3.041 billion (above RMB 1 billion); Shanghai Construction Group: net profit attributable to parent was RMB -179 million (negative), basic earnings per share was RMB -0.04 (negative), and operating profit was RMB -2.4535 million (negative). Only Kedali Electronics satisfies the conditions of positive net profit attributable to parent, positive basic earnings per share, and operating profit below RMB 1 billion. The net cash flow from operating activities in the corresponding Q1 single-quarter report as of April 17, 2024 was RMB 106,461,734.97; the net cash flow from operating activities in the interim report as of September 9, 2024 was RMB 12,258,967.69; the net cash flow from operating activities in the corresponding Q1 single-quarter report as of April 22, 2025 was RMB -161,662,232.53; and the net cash flow from operating activities in the corresponding Q2 single-quarter report as of June 16, 2025 was RMB 155,049,187.94. Ranking the net cash flow from operating activities from high to low: June 16, 2025 (RMB 155,049,187.94) > April 17, 2024 (RMB 106,461,734.97) > September 9, 2024 (RMB 12,258,967.69) > April 22, 2025 (RMB -161,662,232.53). The top two are the Q2 single-quarter report corresponding to June 16, 2025 and the Q1 single-quarter report corresponding to April 17, 2024. On 2025-06-16, Penghua Carbon Neutral Theme Mixed A had a return since inception of 45.1% and a return over the past 6 months of 33.88%; on 2024-04-17, its return since inception was -23.61% and its return over the past 6 months was -15.49%. Only 2025-06-16 satisfies both conditions of return since inception exceeding 0% and return over the past 6 months exceeding 0%. On June 16, 2025, *ST Aowei had a turnover rate of 6.58%, Shaanxi Coal Industry had a turnover rate of 0.32%, Huhua Co., Ltd. had a turnover rate of 1.61%, Dengyun Shares had a turnover rate of 6.56%, and Aerospace Electric Appliances had a turnover rate of 1.42%. Among them, *ST Aowei had the highest turnover rate. The Q1 2025 single-quarter report corresponding to 2025-01-07 shows that *ST Aowei had operating revenue of RMB 22.4977 million (below RMB 30 million), and a gross sales margin of -1.53% (negative). Both 2024-01-11 and 2024-02-02 correspond to the Q1 2024 single-quarter report, in which operating revenue for the reporting period was RMB 101.8921 million (above RMB 30 million), and gross sales margin was 4.20% (positive). Therefore, only 2025-01-07 satisfies the conditions of operating revenue below RMB 30 million and negative gross sales margin; on January 7, 2025, Harvest CSI 300 ETF Linked (LOF) C had an inception date of August 8, 2018 and a management fee rate of 0.15%; China Merchants CSI Liquor Index C had an inception date of May 18, 2021 and a management fee rate of 1.0%; China Universal Hong Kong Advantage Select Mixed (QDII) C had an inception date of February 7, 2023 and a management fee rate of 1.2%; HuaBao CSI Segmented Chemical Industry Theme ETF Linked A had an inception date of June 24, 2021 and a management fee rate of 0.5%; HuaBao CSI Technology Leader ETF had an inception date of August 25, 2021 and a management fee rate of 0.5%. Only Harvest CSI 300 ETF Linked (LOF) C satisfies both conditions of having been established before 2020 and having a management fee rate below 0.2%.", "response_final_reference": "Harvest CSI 300 ETF Feeder (LOF) C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_6", "prompt": "Among Huabao CSI All Agriculture, Forestry, Animal Husbandry and Fishery Index Initiated A, Yongying Xinxin Mixed C, and Harvest CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF, on the two dates 2024-07-25 and 2024-10-30, which two funds ranked in the top two by the average percentile level of fund age (that is, the number of days from the establishment date to that date)? Among the top two funds, which fund had a return over the past week greater than 0% and a return over the past 6 months greater than 0% on 2024-06-03? When was that fund established? In the semiannual report period corresponding to the year in which that fund was established, between Tongling Nonferrous Metals and Sunny Optical Technology, which company had net profit attributable to the parent exceeding 2 billion yuan and basic earnings per share below 0.2 yuan? For that company, among the cumulative quarterly report corresponding to 2024-10-23, the semiannual report corresponding to 2025-08-05, and the semiannual report corresponding to 2025-08-13, on which date did net cash flow from operating activities exceed 1 billion yuan and net cash flow from investment activities fall below -4 billion yuan? On that date, between the two funds Guoshou Ampao Target Date 2030 Three-Year Holding Period Hybrid Initiated (FOF) and Ping An CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF Initiated Feeder C, which fund had the higher return over the past 1 month?", "reference_response": "Sorted by quantile mean in ascending order (lower ranks earlier), the top two are: Yongying Xinxin Mixed C and HuaBao CSI All Share Agriculture, Forestry, Animal Husbandry and Fishery Index Initiated A; on 2024-06-03, only Yongying Xinxin Mixed C met the conditions of a return rate over the past week greater than 0% and a return rate over the past 6 months greater than 0%; Yongying Xinxin Mixed C was established on June 2, 2023; in the 2023 semiannual report (statistics as of June 30, 2023), Tongling Nonferrous's net profit attributable to the parent was 2.053 billion yuan, and basic earnings per share were 0.16 yuan; Sunny Optical Technology's net profit attributable to the parent was 437 million yuan, and basic earnings per share were 0.40 yuan. Only Tongling Nonferrous simultaneously met the conditions of net profit attributable to the parent exceeding 2 billion yuan and basic earnings per share being below 0.2 yuan; on 2024-10-23, because in the financial reporting period corresponding to that date (2024 Q3 cumulative quarterly report), net cash flow from operating activities was 3.674 billion yuan (exceeding 1 billion yuan), and net cash flow from investment activities was -4.853 billion yuan (below -4 billion yuan). In the 2025 semiannual report (corresponding to 2025-08-05 and 2025-08-13), however, net cash flow from operating activities was 379 million yuan (not exceeding 1 billion yuan), and net cash flow from investment activities was -3.096 billion yuan (above -4 billion yuan). Therefore, only 2024-10-23 meets the conditions.; On 2024-10-23, the 1-month return rate of Guoshou Anbao Target Date 2030 Three-Year Holding Period Mixed Initiated (FOF) was 13.087706%, and the 1-month return rate of Ping An CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF Initiated Feeder C was 35.676512%. Sorted by return rate in descending order (the smaller the quantile, the higher the rank), Ping An CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF Initiated Feeder C ranked first (quantile 0), and Guoshou Anbao Target Date 2030 Three-Year Holding Period Mixed Initiated (FOF) ranked second (quantile 1).", "response_final_reference": "Ping An CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF Initiated Feeder C", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_7", "prompt": "For the Fullgoal ChiNext Artificial Intelligence ETF Initiated Link A, among these three dates—2025-01-16, 2025-03-13, and 2025-10-23—on which date was the peer-category average three-month return the highest? In the cumulative quarterly report corresponding to the date when the peer-category average three-month return was highest, among Keli Electric, Northern Rare Earth, and China Pacific Insurance, which company had the highest monetary funds? For that company, among the financial-report quarters corresponding to 2025-01-03, 2025-08-28, and 2025-08-29, on which date was net profit attributable to the parent company the lowest? On that date, among the three funds Huabao CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Internet ETF, Ping An CSI Photovoltaic Industry Index C, and Huabao CSI 500 Index Enhanced A, which fund had the highest return over the past 6 months? For that fund, between the return ranking percentile levels in Q3 2024 and Q1 2025, which quarter ranked higher? On December 17 of that year, between Lopal Tech and Black Sesame International Holding Limited, which company was a Hong Kong Stock Connect eligible security and had a Hong Kong Stock Connect shareholding ratio of more than 40%?", "reference_response": "On 2025-01-16, the peer average three-month return was 0.0187%; on 2025-03-13, it was 0.0208%; and on 2025-10-23, it was 0.1413%. Therefore, the peer average three-month return was highest on 2025-10-23, reaching 0.1413%., According to the cumulative quarterly report data for Q3 2025 (as of 2025-09-30): Keliike had monetary funds of 555 million yuan, Northern Rare Earth had monetary funds of 6.438 billion yuan, and China Pacific Insurance had monetary funds of 46.292 billion yuan. Therefore, China Pacific Insurance had the highest monetary funds.; The net profit attributable to the parent for the Q1 single-quarter report corresponding to 2025-01-03 was 9.627 billion yuan, while the net profit attributable to the parent for the cumulative Q3 quarterly reports corresponding to 2025-08-28 and 2025-08-29 was both 45.7 billion yuan. Therefore, the net profit attributable to the parent corresponding to 2025-01-03 was the lowest.; On 2025-01-03, the six-month return of Huabao CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Internet ETF was 18.21%, the six-month return of Ping An CSI Photovoltaic Industry Index C was 8.25%, and the six-month return of Huabao CSI 500 Index Enhanced A was 8.44%. Therefore, Huabao CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Internet ETF had the highest six-month return.; The percentile level in Q1 2025 was more advanced. Specifically: the percentile in Q3 2024 was 10.96% (rank 290/2647), and the percentile in Q1 2025 was 3.44% (rank 106/3082). A smaller percentile indicates a higher ranking, so Q1 2025 performed better.; On 2025-12-17, China Lopal Tech (02465.HK) was a Stock Connect eligible security, with a Stock Connect shareholding ratio of 48.2121%; Black Sesame International Holding (02533.HK) was a Stock Connect eligible security, with a Stock Connect shareholding ratio of 37.5619%; and Eversun Holdings (02448.HK) was not a Stock Connect eligible security. Only China Lopal Tech satisfies the condition of being a Stock Connect eligible security and having a shareholding ratio exceeding 40%.", "response_final_reference": "Lopal Tech", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_8", "prompt": "For Mango Excellent Media, SGMICRO, and BeiGene, among the cumulative financial report quarters corresponding to 2025-01-20, 2025-05-26, and 2025-10-30, which two dates rank in the top two by average performance in net profit attributable to the parent? On those two dates, on which date did Industrial China Securities Bank 50 Financial Bond Index A have a higher peer-category average one-year return? On the date with the higher peer-category average one-year return, among the four companies Thunder Power, China Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fenglin Group, and Sichuan Changhong, which company had trading volume exceeding 10 million shares and turnover rate below 1%? What sector does that company belong to? What are the constituent ETFs/funds related to that sector? Are the four funds Chinese Medicine 50 ETF, Chinese Medicine ETF Huatai-PineBridge, Chinese Medicine ETF, and Chinese Medicine ETF included? If so, what were the main net inflows of the four funds on 2024-10-08, respectively? Which fund had the largest absolute value of main net inflow? `0", "reference_response": "The average value for 2025-10-30 (Mango Excellent Media: 101,587.14 ten thousand yuan / SG Micro: 34,323.46 ten thousand yuan / BeiGene: 113,859.60 ten thousand yuan) is 83,256.77 ten thousand yuan; the average value for 2025-05-26 (Mango Excellent Media: 76,339.75 ten thousand yuan / SG Micro: 20,083.91 ten thousand yuan / BeiGene: 44,978.40 ten thousand yuan) is 47,134.02 ten thousand yuan. Ranked by average value from high to low, the top two are 2025-10-30 and 2025-05-26; the average one-year return rate of comparable categories on 2025-05-26 was 0.0304%, and on 2025-10-30 it was 0.0243%. By comparison, the average one-year return rate of comparable categories on 2025-05-26 was higher; on 2025-05-26, LDI Technology had a trading volume of 5.3725 million shares and a turnover rate of 2.60%; China Traditional Chinese Medicine had a trading volume of 13.77 million shares and a turnover rate of 0.27%; Fenglin Group had a trading volume of 12.0986 million shares and a turnover rate of 1.08%; Sichuan Changhong had a trading volume of 81.8979 million shares and a turnover rate of 1.77%; only China Traditional Chinese Medicine simultaneously meets the conditions of trading volume exceeding 10 million shares (13.77 million shares) and turnover rate below 1% (0.27%), and the sector it belongs to is Traditional Chinese Medicine. Relevant ETFs/funds include: Traditional Chinese Medicine 50 ETF, Traditional Chinese Medicine ETF Huatai-PineBridge, Traditional Chinese Medicine ETF, Traditional Chinese Medicine ETF; on 2024-10-08, the main net inflow of Traditional Chinese Medicine 50 ETF (562390.SH) was 624,100 yuan, that of Traditional Chinese Medicine ETF Huatai-PineBridge (561510.SH) was -2.3725 million yuan, that of Traditional Chinese Medicine ETF (560080.SH) was -29.0812 million yuan, and that of Traditional Chinese Medicine ETF (159647.SZ) was -20.5735 million yuan; the one with the largest absolute value of main net inflow was Traditional Chinese Medicine ETF (560080.SH), with the corresponding indicator value of approximately 29.0812 million yuan. Evaluation standard: accurate to 29.08 million yuan is sufficient.", "response_final_reference": "Traditional Chinese Medicine ETF (560080.SH), corresponding indicator value is approximately RMB 29.0812 million. Evaluation standard: accurate to RMB 29.08 million is sufficient.", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"} {"prompt_id": "L3_6hop_9", "prompt": "On which of the two dates, 2024-05-22 and 2025-01-23, did Jiugui Liquor’s turnover rate first fall below 2%? On that first date when it fell below 2%, among the four funds Ping An CSI Auto Parts Theme ETF Link A, Guotai Communication Equipment C, CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy, and Xin Yuan CSI 2000 Index Enhanced A, which fund is a hybrid fund and has a fund size exceeding 1 billion yuan? For the selected fund, among the three dates 2025-03-20, 2025-08-20, and 2025-11-14, which two dates had the highest returns over the past 3 months? At those two dates with the highest near-3-month returns, among Asia Potash International, Feilixin, and Vanke A, which companies’ financing balances continued to grow? Among those companies whose financing balances continued to grow, in the cumulative quarterly report for Q3 2024, which company had accounts receivable below 100 million yuan and monetary funds exceeding 500 million yuan? For this company, on what date was its 2023 Q2 single-quarter financial report released?", "reference_response": "On 2024-05-22, the turnover rate was 2.37%, and on 2025-01-23, the turnover rate was 1.34%. Therefore, it first fell below the integer threshold of 2% on 2025-01-23. On 2025-01-23, the basic information of each fund was as follows: Ping An CSI Auto Parts Theme ETF Link A had a fund type of index - equity, with a fund size of 12.9263 million yuan; Guotai Communication Equipment C had a fund type of hybrid - partial bond, with a fund size of 7.8847 million yuan; CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy had a fund type of hybrid, with a fund size of 1.133 billion yuan; Xinyuan Guozheng 2000 Index Enhanced A had a fund type of index - equity index enhanced, with a fund size of 94.3095 million yuan. Only CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy simultaneously met the conditions of having a hybrid fund type and a fund size exceeding 1 billion yuan. Its return rate over the past 3 months on 2025-03-20 was 6.2413%; on 2025-08-20, its return rate over the past 3 months was 13.3396%; on 2025-11-14, its return rate over the past 3 months was 9.0647%. Among the three time points, ranked by return rate over the past 3 months from high to low: 2025-08-20 (13.34%) > 2025-11-14 (9.06%) > 2025-03-20 (6.24%). By quantile comparison: the quantile on 2025-08-20 was 0 (ranked first), the quantile on 2025-11-14 was 0.5 (ranked second), and the quantile on 2025-03-20 was 1 (ranked third). Therefore, the two time points with the highest return rates over the past 3 months were 2025-08-20 and 2025-11-14. Yaka International (2025-08-20: 722,906,194 yuan → 2025-11-14: 736,803,598 yuan), and Feilixin (2025-08-20: 441,474,340 yuan → 2025-11-14: 442,717,926 yuan). The financing balances of both companies showed a continuous growth trend during this period. According to the cumulative quarterly report data for Q3 2024, Yaka International had accounts receivable of 35.0909 million yuan (below 100 million yuan) and monetary funds of 700.1239 million yuan (above 500 million yuan); Feilixin had accounts receivable of 692.3106 million yuan (above 100 million yuan) and monetary funds of 61.7340 million yuan (below 500 million yuan). Only Yaka International simultaneously met the conditions of accounts receivable below 100 million yuan and monetary funds above 500 million yuan; Yaka International's single-quarter financial report for Q2 2023 was released on 2024-08-30.", "response_final_reference": "August 30, 2024", "judge_prompt_template": ":\n{prompt}\n\n:\n{response_reference}\n\n:\n{response}", "label": "L3_6hop", "final_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: The student answer must be based on search data and should not be based on the student's own inference.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Final Answer Scoring Rules (score only the final answer, ignore the process)]\nYou are only allowed to check whether the \"final answer\" is consistent with the (ignoring format differences such as units and percentage conversions).\n- If consistent: score 1 point.\n- Otherwise: score 0 points.\nIt is forbidden to give any score between 0 and 1; do not add or deduct points for the process part.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Use no more than 150 words to explain whether the final answer is consistent.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\nThe grading task officially begins:\n", "process_judge_system_prompt": "\nBased on the given , conduct an objective and rigorous evaluation of the . You must abandon any tendency to solve the problem independently and strictly act as an execution tool for judging the answer.\nBefore performing any score calculation, you must first pass the following hard filters; if any condition is not met, directly assign 0 points:\n1. Empirical check: Determine whether the is supported by evidence. If the is obtained directly through assumption, reasoning, guessing, etc. without evidence, directly assign 0 points.\n2. Content existence: If the student answer is empty or contains garbled text, directly assign 0 points. Irrelevant content is allowed and will not be penalized.\n\n[Process Answer Scoring Rules (score only the process, completely ignore the final answer)]\nThe contains the \"process answer\" and the \"final answer\" (or similar summary/conclusion). You must:\n- Extract and score only the process key points such as the \"process answer/intermediate steps/sub-question answers\";\n- Explicitly exclude content such as the \"final answer/final conclusion/therefore/in summary\" from scoring. It must not be counted in N, nor affect the score.\n\nScoring method (N process key points, each scored 0/1):\n1) Break down the question and the corresponding reference answer key points, and count the total number of process key points in the as N (excluding the final answer).\n2) For each process key point (which is an answer to an intermediate sub-question rather than supporting evidence), determine whether the provides the corresponding and correct process conclusion/intermediate result: record 1 if correct, 0 if incorrect or missing.\n3) The full score for the process part is 0.5 points: total score = 0.5 * (number of process key points hit) / N. If N=0, then the total score is 0.\nCriteria: The reference answer is absolutely correct and may not be questioned.\nIf the reference answer requires \"multiple choice/multiple key points,\" the student must cover them completely. If any sub-item is omitted, that item receives no score.\nCompatibility: Values that are substantively equal are considered correct (e.g., 0.15 = 15\\%), and missing units do not affect correctness judgment.\n\nYou must respond strictly in the following format, and no extra opening remarks are allowed:\n1. [Scoring Basis]: Briefly state what N is, which process key points were hit, and which were missed, within 150 words.\n2. [JSON]:\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": score value}\n```\n\nExample:\n\nAmong the three companies Guqi Down Materials, Zhongda Lide, and Binhai Energy, in the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, which company had net profit exceeding 10 million yuan and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan? When was that company listed? On the day that company was listed, between Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C and Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF), which fund had a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months?\",\n：\nIn the Q3 single-quarter reports corresponding to 2024-10-16, Binhai Energy had net profit of 1.8317 million yuan and income tax expense of 1.3599 million yuan; Guqi Down Materials had net profit of 40.6356 million yuan and income tax expense of 0 yuan; Zhongda Lide had net profit of 13.3423 million yuan and income tax expense of 369,300 yuan. Only Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C had a return of 12.66% over the past year and -9.01% over the past three months; Tianhong Yongfeng Steady Pension Target One-Year Holding Hybrid (FOF) had a return of 2.69% over the past year and 0.86% over the past three months. Only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n：\nOnly Guqi Down Materials meets the conditions of net profit exceeding 10 million yuan (40.6356 million yuan > 10 million yuan) and income tax expense below 100,000 yuan (0 yuan < 100,000 yuan). Guqi Down Materials was listed on the A-share market on 2025-05-29. On 2025-05-29, only Harvest SSE STAR & ChiNext 50 Index C meets the conditions of having a return of more than 10% over the past year and a negative return over the past three months.\n\n[Scoring Basis]\nN = 2. The student answer hits the two process key points: Guqi Down Materials and 2025-05-29, with nothing missed. 0.5 * 2 / 2 = 0.5 [JSON]\n```json\n{\"answer_score\": 0.5}\n```\n\nThe grading task officially begins:\n"}