Download code/scripts/02_france_geo.py from Jyo-K/PopTurk: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 7.3 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/Jyo-K/PopTurk/resolve/main/code/scripts/02_france_geo.py
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/Jyo-K/PopTurk/code/scripts/02_france_geo.py
-
curl -L -o 02_france_geo.py https://huggingface.co/datasets/Jyo-K/PopTurk/resolve/main/code/scripts/02_france_geo.py
7.3 kB
| """Step A. Mine administrative equivalences, and VALIDATE them where labels exist. | |
| The validation is the whole reason this script is longer than the miner. France has no labels, | |
| so a France-only change can never be checked directly - and the last France change made on | |
| reasoning alone pointed the threshold in the wrong direction. | |
| The honest substitute: the same generator produced US and India, the same swap appears there | |
| (district vs state, county vs state), and those DO have labels. So the miner is run on all | |
| three countries, and on US/India the mined features are scored against ground truth. If they | |
| separate true pairs from false ones there, the France table is trustworthy for the same | |
| reason. If they do not, the France table is discarded rather than shipped on faith. | |
| Runs on CPU in a few minutes. No GPU, no model, no artifacts from any other pipeline. | |
| """ | |
| from __future__ import annotations | |
| import argparse | |
| import json | |
| import os | |
| import random | |
| import sys | |
| import numpy as np | |
| import pandas as pd | |
| sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))) | |
| from berx import france_geo as G # noqa: E402 | |
| from berx import paths as P # noqa: E402 | |
| def load_prep(split: str): | |
| d = os.path.dirname(P.work("prep", split, "_")) | |
| s1 = pd.read_parquet(os.path.join(d, "source1.parquet")) | |
| pool = pd.read_parquet(os.path.join(d, "pool.parquet")) | |
| return s1, pool | |
| def validate(s1: pd.DataFrame, pool: pd.DataFrame, gt_path: str, matcher: G.GeoMatcher, | |
| country: str, n_pos: int = 4000, seed: int = 42): | |
| """Do the mined features separate true pairs from hard false ones, on a labelled country? | |
| The negatives are deliberately HARD: for each sampled true pair, a different pool record | |
| of the same country whose name shares a token with the S1. Random negatives would be | |
| separated by the name alone and would tell us nothing about whether the geo features work. | |
| """ | |
| from berx import textnorm as T | |
| gt = pd.read_csv(gt_path, sep="\t", dtype=str, keep_default_na=False, na_filter=False) \ | |
| if gt_path.endswith(".tsv") else pd.read_parquet(gt_path) | |
| s1c = s1[s1["country"] == country] | |
| s1_idx = dict(zip(s1c["entity_id"], range(len(s1c)))) | |
| s1a = dict(zip(s1c["entity_id"], s1c["business_address"])) | |
| s1n = dict(zip(s1c["entity_id"], s1c["business_name"])) | |
| poolc = pool[pool["country"] == country] | |
| pa = dict(zip(poolc["entity_id"], poolc["business_address"])) | |
| pn = dict(zip(poolc["entity_id"], poolc["business_name"])) | |
| tok_index: dict[str, list] = {} | |
| for eid, nm in pn.items(): | |
| for t in set(T.tokens(T.norm_text(nm))): | |
| tok_index.setdefault(t, []).append(eid) | |
| rng = random.Random(seed) | |
| rows = [] | |
| gt = gt[gt["source1_entity_id"].isin(s1_idx)] | |
| for _, r in gt.sample(min(n_pos, len(gt)), random_state=seed).iterrows(): | |
| q = r["source1_entity_id"] | |
| mids = [x for x in str(r["matched_entity_ids"]).split(",") if x in pa] | |
| if not mids: | |
| continue | |
| c = rng.choice(mids) | |
| rows.append((s1a[q], pa[c], 1)) | |
| cand = [] | |
| for t in set(T.tokens(T.norm_text(s1n[q]))): | |
| cand += tok_index.get(t, [])[:50] | |
| cand = [x for x in cand if x not in set(mids)] | |
| if cand: | |
| rows.append((s1a[q], pa[rng.choice(cand)], 0)) | |
| if not rows: | |
| return None | |
| F = pd.DataFrame([{**matcher.features(a, b), "y": y} for a, b, y in rows]) | |
| rep = {} | |
| for c in G.FEATURE_NAMES: | |
| t, f = F[F.y == 1][c], F[F.y == 0][c] | |
| rep[c] = {"true_mean": round(float(t.mean()), 4), | |
| "false_mean": round(float(f.mean()), 4), | |
| "separation": round(float(t.mean() - f.mean()), 4)} | |
| # the headline check: does equiv beat exact at telling true from false? | |
| rep["_n"] = len(F) | |
| rep["_lift_equiv_over_exact"] = round( | |
| rep["geo_equiv"]["separation"] - rep["geo_exact"]["separation"], 4) | |
| return rep | |
| def main(): | |
| ap = argparse.ArgumentParser() | |
| ap.add_argument("--split", default="test") | |
| ap.add_argument("--validate-on", default="train", | |
| help="split that has ground truth, for the US/India sanity check") | |
| ap.add_argument("--min-support", type=int, default=8) | |
| ap.add_argument("--min-ratio", type=float, default=0.35) | |
| ap.add_argument("--skip-validate", action="store_true") | |
| a = ap.parse_args() | |
| s1, pool = load_prep(a.split) | |
| tables = {} | |
| for country in sorted(set(pool["country"])): | |
| sub = pool[pool["country"] == country]["business_address"] | |
| sub1 = s1[s1["country"] == country]["business_address"] | |
| print(f"\n== {country}: mining over {len(sub) + len(sub1):,} addresses") | |
| t = G.mine(list(sub) + list(sub1), min_support=a.min_support, min_ratio=a.min_ratio) | |
| n_pairs = sum(len(v) for v in t["equiv"].values()) // 2 | |
| print(f" admin names {t['n_admin_names']:,} equivalences {n_pairs:,}") | |
| ex = [(k, sorted(v.items(), key=lambda kv: -kv[1])[:3]) | |
| for k, v in list(t["equiv"].items())[:8]] | |
| for k, v in ex: | |
| print(f" {k!r:32} ~ {[(x, s) for x, s in v]}") | |
| tables[country] = t | |
| out = P.work("geo", f"equiv_{a.split}.json") | |
| with open(out, "w", encoding="utf-8") as fh: | |
| json.dump(tables, fh, ensure_ascii=False) | |
| print(f"\nwrote {out}") | |
| if a.skip_validate: | |
| return | |
| print("\n" + "=" * 72) | |
| print("VALIDATION on labelled countries - does this help where we can check it?") | |
| print("=" * 72) | |
| s1t, poolt = load_prep(a.validate_on) | |
| gt = P.ground_truth(a.validate_on) | |
| report = {} | |
| for country in ("US", "India"): | |
| if country not in set(poolt["country"]): | |
| continue | |
| # validate with the table mined on the SAME split, or the check is contaminated by | |
| # the test pool having been used to build the thing being tested | |
| tt = G.mine(list(poolt[poolt["country"] == country]["business_address"]), | |
| min_support=a.min_support, min_ratio=a.min_ratio) | |
| rep = validate(s1t, poolt, gt, G.GeoMatcher(tt), country) | |
| if rep: | |
| report[country] = rep | |
| print(f"\n {country} (n={rep['_n']:,})") | |
| for c in G.FEATURE_NAMES: | |
| r = rep[c] | |
| print(f" {c:<16} true {r['true_mean']:>8.4f} false {r['false_mean']:>8.4f}" | |
| f" sep {r['separation']:>+8.4f}") | |
| print(f" -> equiv beats exact by {rep['_lift_equiv_over_exact']:+.4f}") | |
| ok = all(r["_lift_equiv_over_exact"] > 0.002 for r in report.values()) and report | |
| print("\n" + ("PASS - the equivalence table adds separation on labelled countries, so the" | |
| "\n France table is worth shipping as features." | |
| if ok else | |
| "FAIL - equiv does not beat exact where we can check it. Do NOT ship the" | |
| "\n France table; the swap is either rarer or differently shaped than" | |
| "\n assumed, and shipping it on reasoning alone is how the last France" | |
| "\n change went in backwards.")) | |
| with open(P.work("geo", "validation.json"), "w") as fh: | |
| json.dump(report, fh, indent=1) | |
| if __name__ == "__main__": | |
| main() | |