Production lessons: atomic writes, idempotency, dependsOn DAG, log[], crash recovery
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -98,15 +98,21 @@ The only communication channel between Planner and Executor is a JSON file that
|
|
| 98 |
"status": "pending",
|
| 99 |
"threadId": "18f3a2b...",
|
| 100 |
"from": "kikocisneros@gmail.com",
|
| 101 |
-
"createdAt": "2026-05-31T09:12:00.000Z"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 102 |
}
|
| 103 |
],
|
| 104 |
"updatedAt": "2026-05-31T09:12:05.123Z"
|
| 105 |
}
|
| 106 |
```
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 |
-
**Task statuses**: `pending` β `in-progress` β `done` | `failed`
|
| 109 |
-
**Priority**: `1` = urgent, `2` = normal, `3` = low
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
This file is readable by humans, inspectable at any time, and survives process crashes.
|
| 112 |
|
|
@@ -114,7 +120,7 @@ This file is readable by humans, inspectable at any time, and survives process c
|
|
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
### The Planner Prompt
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
-
The Scheduler
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
```
|
| 120 |
ROL: PLANIFICADOR
|
|
@@ -127,12 +133,18 @@ Nueva comunicaciΓ³n recibida:
|
|
| 127 |
Tu tarea (sΓ© rΓ‘pido y concreto):
|
| 128 |
1. Lee el email: python3 mail_client.py get-thread "18f3a2b..."
|
| 129 |
2. Lee el fichero de tareas actual: cat agent-tasks.json
|
| 130 |
-
3.
|
| 131 |
-
{
|
| 132 |
-
"
|
| 133 |
-
"
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 136 |
4. Actualiza el campo "plan" con tu anΓ‘lisis breve
|
| 137 |
5. Escribe el fichero actualizado
|
| 138 |
6. Sal cuando hayas terminado de planificar.
|
|
@@ -141,34 +153,196 @@ Tu tarea (sΓ© rΓ‘pido y concreto):
|
|
| 141 |
Key constraints on the Planner:
|
| 142 |
- **It never executes**. It only reads and writes `agent-tasks.json`
|
| 143 |
- **It deduplicates**: checks existing tasks by `threadId` before adding new ones
|
|
|
|
| 144 |
- **It exits immediately** after writing the plan
|
| 145 |
|
| 146 |
---
|
| 147 |
|
| 148 |
### The Executor Prompt
|
| 149 |
|
| 150 |
-
The Executor picks up `agent-tasks.json` and works through it:
|
| 151 |
|
| 152 |
```
|
| 153 |
ROL: EJECUTOR
|
| 154 |
|
| 155 |
Ejecuta las tareas pendientes de agent-tasks.json.
|
| 156 |
|
| 157 |
-
Proceso (repite hasta que no haya mΓ‘s tareas
|
| 158 |
1. Lee agent-tasks.json
|
| 159 |
2. Toma la tarea con status="pending" de mayor prioridad (1=urgente)
|
| 160 |
-
|
| 161 |
-
|
| 162 |
-
|
| 163 |
-
|
| 164 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 165 |
|
| 166 |
Reglas:
|
| 167 |
- Marca "failed" (no crashees) si algo falla, continΓΊa con la siguiente
|
|
|
|
| 168 |
- Usa mail_client.py para enviar respuestas de email
|
| 169 |
```
|
| 170 |
|
| 171 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 |
---
|
| 174 |
|
|
@@ -183,26 +357,17 @@ T+180s Executor completes tasks, replies to email β exits
|
|
| 183 |
T+240s Executor tick fires β no pending tasks β skips (noop)
|
| 184 |
```
|
| 185 |
|
| 186 |
-
Concurrency is controlled by
|
| 187 |
|
| 188 |
```javascript
|
| 189 |
-
let schedulerRunning = false;
|
| 190 |
-
let executorRunning = false;
|
| 191 |
-
|
| 192 |
// Only one Scheduler active per agent at a time
|
| 193 |
-
if (agentSessions.isActive(skillId, 'scheduler'))
|
| 194 |
-
console.log(`scheduler already active, skipping`);
|
| 195 |
-
return null;
|
| 196 |
-
}
|
| 197 |
|
| 198 |
// Only one Executor active per agent at a time
|
| 199 |
-
if (agentSessions.isActive(skillId, 'executor'))
|
| 200 |
-
console.log(`executor already active, skipping`);
|
| 201 |
-
return null;
|
| 202 |
-
}
|
| 203 |
```
|
| 204 |
|
| 205 |
-
Crucially: **the Scheduler and Executor can run simultaneously**. While the Executor is working on task #1, the Scheduler can plan tasks #2 and #3.
|
| 206 |
|
| 207 |
---
|
| 208 |
|
|
@@ -219,10 +384,9 @@ const args = [
|
|
| 219 |
'--model', resolvedModel,
|
| 220 |
];
|
| 221 |
if (resumeClaudeId) args.push('--resume', resumeClaudeId);
|
| 222 |
-
args.push('-p', `/${skillId}\n\n${prompt}`);
|
| 223 |
```
|
| 224 |
|
| 225 |
-
|
| 226 |
|
| 227 |
---
|
| 228 |
|
|
@@ -232,10 +396,13 @@ This means the Executor doesn't start cold each time. It already knows the agent
|
|
| 232 |
|---------|-------------|-----------------|
|
| 233 |
| New email while executing | Missed until session ends | Scheduler handles it immediately |
|
| 234 |
| Task priority | FIFO only | Explicit priority 1-2-3 |
|
| 235 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 236 |
| Long-running tasks | Blocks everything | Executor runs async, Scheduler stays free |
|
| 237 |
-
| Debugging | One long session, hard to inspect | `agent-tasks.json`
|
| 238 |
-
| Cost control | Hard to limit mid-session |
|
|
|
|
| 239 |
|
| 240 |
---
|
| 241 |
|
|
@@ -245,7 +412,7 @@ Before launching either agent, the system checks monthly spend:
|
|
| 245 |
|
| 246 |
```javascript
|
| 247 |
if (agent.spendingLimitMonthly != null) {
|
| 248 |
-
const spent = await getMonthlySpend(skillId);
|
| 249 |
if (spent >= agent.spendingLimitMonthly) {
|
| 250 |
console.warn(`monthly limit $${agent.spendingLimitMonthly} reached β launch blocked`);
|
| 251 |
return null;
|
|
@@ -253,27 +420,14 @@ if (agent.spendingLimitMonthly != null) {
|
|
| 253 |
}
|
| 254 |
```
|
| 255 |
|
| 256 |
-
|
| 257 |
-
|
| 258 |
-
---
|
| 259 |
-
|
| 260 |
-
## The `agent-tasks.json` as a Coordination Protocol
|
| 261 |
-
|
| 262 |
-
The file acts as a simple, durable message queue. It is:
|
| 263 |
-
|
| 264 |
-
- **Persistent**: survives process restarts
|
| 265 |
-
- **Inspectable**: `cat agent-tasks.json` shows exactly what the agent is doing
|
| 266 |
-
- **Editable by hand**: add a task manually and the Executor will pick it up
|
| 267 |
-
- **Self-documenting**: the `plan` field explains the agent's current understanding
|
| 268 |
-
|
| 269 |
-
This replaces Redis, RabbitMQ, or any external queue system with a 30-line module.
|
| 270 |
|
| 271 |
---
|
| 272 |
|
| 273 |
## Complete Flow Diagram
|
| 274 |
|
| 275 |
```
|
| 276 |
-
Inbox (IMAP)
|
| 277 |
β
|
| 278 |
β (polled every 60s)
|
| 279 |
βΌ
|
|
@@ -289,15 +443,16 @@ gmail-poller.js
|
|
| 289 |
β (Claude CLI, ROL: PLANIFICADOR)
|
| 290 |
β reads email thread via mail_client.py
|
| 291 |
β reads agent-tasks.json
|
| 292 |
-
β
|
| 293 |
-
β
|
|
|
|
| 294 |
ββ exits
|
| 295 |
|
| 296 |
(2 min later...)
|
| 297 |
|
| 298 |
tickExecutor()
|
| 299 |
β
|
| 300 |
-
ββ
|
| 301 |
β
|
| 302 |
ββ yes
|
| 303 |
β
|
|
@@ -306,37 +461,25 @@ tickExecutor()
|
|
| 306 |
β
|
| 307 |
β (Claude CLI, ROL: EJECUTOR)
|
| 308 |
β reads agent-tasks.json
|
| 309 |
-
β picks highest-priority pending task
|
| 310 |
-
β marks in-progress
|
| 311 |
β executes (code, email reply, API call, deploy...)
|
| 312 |
-
β marks done/failed with result
|
| 313 |
-
β loops until queue empty
|
| 314 |
ββ exits
|
| 315 |
```
|
| 316 |
|
| 317 |
---
|
| 318 |
|
| 319 |
-
## What This Enables in Practice
|
| 320 |
-
|
| 321 |
-
An agent built on this pattern can:
|
| 322 |
-
|
| 323 |
-
1. **Handle multiple simultaneous email threads** β each gets planned independently, executed in priority order
|
| 324 |
-
2. **Survive long-running tasks** β a deploy that takes 3 minutes doesn't block other planning
|
| 325 |
-
3. **Recover from failures gracefully** β failed tasks are logged, not lost
|
| 326 |
-
4. **Learn across sessions** β `--resume` means the Executor accumulates context over time
|
| 327 |
-
5. **Be audited** β `agent-tasks.json` is the full audit log of what was planned and what happened
|
| 328 |
-
|
| 329 |
-
---
|
| 330 |
-
|
| 331 |
## Implementation in ClonAgent
|
| 332 |
|
| 333 |
The full implementation is open source:
|
| 334 |
|
| 335 |
| File | Role |
|
| 336 |
|------|------|
|
| 337 |
-
| [`server/lib/gmail-poller.js`](https://github.com/KikoCisBot/clonagent/blob/main/server/lib/gmail-poller.js) | Orchestrator: poller ticks, triggers Scheduler and Executor |
|
| 338 |
-
| [`server/lib/relay-client.js`](https://github.com/KikoCisBot/clonagent/blob/main/server/lib/relay-client.js) | Launches Scheduler and Executor via Claude CLI |
|
| 339 |
-
| [`server/lib/task-queue.js`](https://github.com/KikoCisBot/clonagent/blob/main/server/lib/task-queue.js) |
|
| 340 |
| [`server/lib/agent-sessions.js`](https://github.com/KikoCisBot/clonagent/blob/main/server/lib/agent-sessions.js) | Tracks active Scheduler/Executor sessions, prevents overlaps |
|
| 341 |
|
| 342 |
---
|
|
@@ -347,9 +490,18 @@ The Planner-Executor pattern is a practical approach to building reliable AI age
|
|
| 347 |
|
| 348 |
The key insight is that **planning and execution are different cognitive tasks** that benefit from separation β not just conceptually, but as separate model invocations with different prompts, different time horizons, and different failure modes.
|
| 349 |
|
| 350 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 351 |
|
| 352 |
-
The result is an agent that feels less like a script and more like a colleague: it reads your email, decides what matters,
|
| 353 |
|
| 354 |
---
|
| 355 |
|
|
|
|
| 98 |
"status": "pending",
|
| 99 |
"threadId": "18f3a2b...",
|
| 100 |
"from": "kikocisneros@gmail.com",
|
| 101 |
+
"createdAt": "2026-05-31T09:12:00.000Z",
|
| 102 |
+
"retries": 0,
|
| 103 |
+
"log": [],
|
| 104 |
+
"dependsOn": []
|
| 105 |
}
|
| 106 |
],
|
| 107 |
"updatedAt": "2026-05-31T09:12:05.123Z"
|
| 108 |
}
|
| 109 |
```
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
+
**Task statuses**: `pending` β `in-progress` β `done` | `failed` | `skipped`
|
| 112 |
+
**Priority**: `1` = urgent, `2` = normal, `3` = low
|
| 113 |
+
**`retries`**: auto-incremented on failure and recovery
|
| 114 |
+
**`log[]`**: timestamped progress entries written by the Executor during execution
|
| 115 |
+
**`dependsOn[]`**: IDs of tasks that must be `done` before this one is eligible
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
This file is readable by humans, inspectable at any time, and survives process crashes.
|
| 118 |
|
|
|
|
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
### The Planner Prompt
|
| 122 |
|
| 123 |
+
The Scheduler receives a tightly scoped prompt that constrains it to planning only:
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
```
|
| 126 |
ROL: PLANIFICADOR
|
|
|
|
| 133 |
Tu tarea (sΓ© rΓ‘pido y concreto):
|
| 134 |
1. Lee el email: python3 mail_client.py get-thread "18f3a2b..."
|
| 135 |
2. Lee el fichero de tareas actual: cat agent-tasks.json
|
| 136 |
+
3. Decide quΓ© tareas hay que hacer. Por cada tarea, aΓ±Γ‘dela con esta forma:
|
| 137 |
+
{
|
| 138 |
+
"id": "<uuid4>", "title": "...", "description": "...",
|
| 139 |
+
"priority": 1, "status": "pending",
|
| 140 |
+
"threadId": "...", "from": "...", "createdAt": "<iso>",
|
| 141 |
+
"retries": 0, "log": [],
|
| 142 |
+
"dependsOn": [] β IDs of other tasks that must be done first
|
| 143 |
+
}
|
| 144 |
+
- priority: 1=urgent, 2=normal, 3=low
|
| 145 |
+
- dependsOn: list task IDs in this file that must be "done" before this one runs
|
| 146 |
+
- Do NOT add tasks if threadId already exists with any status other than "failed"
|
| 147 |
+
- If threadId exists with status "failed", add nothing β the Executor will retry automatically
|
| 148 |
4. Actualiza el campo "plan" con tu anΓ‘lisis breve
|
| 149 |
5. Escribe el fichero actualizado
|
| 150 |
6. Sal cuando hayas terminado de planificar.
|
|
|
|
| 153 |
Key constraints on the Planner:
|
| 154 |
- **It never executes**. It only reads and writes `agent-tasks.json`
|
| 155 |
- **It deduplicates**: checks existing tasks by `threadId` before adding new ones
|
| 156 |
+
- **It models dependencies**: can express "deploy after tests pass" with `dependsOn`
|
| 157 |
- **It exits immediately** after writing the plan
|
| 158 |
|
| 159 |
---
|
| 160 |
|
| 161 |
### The Executor Prompt
|
| 162 |
|
| 163 |
+
The Executor picks up `agent-tasks.json` and works through it, respecting dependencies and logging progress:
|
| 164 |
|
| 165 |
```
|
| 166 |
ROL: EJECUTOR
|
| 167 |
|
| 168 |
Ejecuta las tareas pendientes de agent-tasks.json.
|
| 169 |
|
| 170 |
+
Proceso (repite hasta que no haya mΓ‘s tareas ejecutables):
|
| 171 |
1. Lee agent-tasks.json
|
| 172 |
2. Toma la tarea con status="pending" de mayor prioridad (1=urgente)
|
| 173 |
+
cuyo dependsOn[] estΓ© vacΓo o todas sus deps estΓ©n "done".
|
| 174 |
+
Si ninguna cumple esto, sal.
|
| 175 |
+
3. Actualiza status a "in-progress"; aΓ±ade al log[]: { "ts": "<iso>", "msg": "Iniciando: <tΓtulo>" }
|
| 176 |
+
4. Ejecuta la tarea; aΓ±ade entradas al log[] con progreso real durante la ejecuciΓ³n
|
| 177 |
+
5. Al terminar:
|
| 178 |
+
- status: "done" o "failed"
|
| 179 |
+
- result: descripciΓ³n breve del resultado
|
| 180 |
+
- updatedAt: <iso>
|
| 181 |
+
- Si retries >= 3: status="failed", result="Max retries reached: <reason>"
|
| 182 |
+
6. Si quedan tareas pending ejecutables, vuelve al paso 1
|
| 183 |
+
7. Cuando no haya ninguna tarea pending ejecutable, sal
|
| 184 |
|
| 185 |
Reglas:
|
| 186 |
- Marca "failed" (no crashees) si algo falla, continΓΊa con la siguiente
|
| 187 |
+
- El campo log[] es visible al usuario β ΓΊsalo para reflejar progreso real
|
| 188 |
- Usa mail_client.py para enviar respuestas de email
|
| 189 |
```
|
| 190 |
|
| 191 |
+
---
|
| 192 |
+
|
| 193 |
+
## Task Dependencies: Basic DAG
|
| 194 |
+
|
| 195 |
+
The `dependsOn` field turns `agent-tasks.json` into a minimal DAG (directed acyclic graph) without any external scheduler:
|
| 196 |
+
|
| 197 |
+
```json
|
| 198 |
+
[
|
| 199 |
+
{ "id": "task-run-tests", "title": "Run test suite", "status": "pending", "dependsOn": [] },
|
| 200 |
+
{ "id": "task-deploy-prod","title": "Deploy to prod", "status": "pending", "dependsOn": ["task-run-tests"] },
|
| 201 |
+
{ "id": "task-notify", "title": "Reply with result", "status": "pending", "dependsOn": ["task-deploy-prod"] }
|
| 202 |
+
]
|
| 203 |
+
```
|
| 204 |
+
|
| 205 |
+
The Executor resolves this automatically:
|
| 206 |
+
|
| 207 |
+
```javascript
|
| 208 |
+
function getNextTask(agentId) {
|
| 209 |
+
const queue = read(agentId);
|
| 210 |
+
const { tasks } = queue;
|
| 211 |
+
let dirty = false;
|
| 212 |
+
|
| 213 |
+
const pending = tasks
|
| 214 |
+
.filter(t => t.status === 'pending')
|
| 215 |
+
.sort((a, b) => (a.priority || 2) - (b.priority || 2));
|
| 216 |
+
|
| 217 |
+
let result = null;
|
| 218 |
+
for (const task of pending) {
|
| 219 |
+
if (!task.dependsOn?.length) { result = task; break; }
|
| 220 |
+
|
| 221 |
+
const deps = task.dependsOn.map(id => tasks.find(t => t.id === id));
|
| 222 |
+
const failedDep = deps.find(d => d?.status === 'failed');
|
| 223 |
+
|
| 224 |
+
if (failedDep) {
|
| 225 |
+
// Auto-skip tasks whose dependency failed β no manual intervention needed
|
| 226 |
+
task.status = 'skipped';
|
| 227 |
+
task.result = `Skipped: dependency "${failedDep.title}" failed`;
|
| 228 |
+
task.log.push({ ts: new Date().toISOString(), msg: task.result });
|
| 229 |
+
dirty = true;
|
| 230 |
+
continue;
|
| 231 |
+
}
|
| 232 |
+
|
| 233 |
+
if (deps.every(d => d?.status === 'done')) { result = task; break; }
|
| 234 |
+
}
|
| 235 |
+
|
| 236 |
+
if (dirty) write(agentId, queue);
|
| 237 |
+
return result;
|
| 238 |
+
}
|
| 239 |
+
```
|
| 240 |
+
|
| 241 |
+
If `task-run-tests` fails, `task-deploy-prod` and `task-notify` are automatically skipped. No cascade failure, no stuck queue.
|
| 242 |
+
|
| 243 |
+
---
|
| 244 |
+
|
| 245 |
+
## Idempotency: Handling Re-delivered Emails
|
| 246 |
+
|
| 247 |
+
Email systems re-deliver. Networks retry. The Planner must be idempotent:
|
| 248 |
+
|
| 249 |
+
```javascript
|
| 250 |
+
function addTask(agentId, newTask) {
|
| 251 |
+
const queue = read(agentId);
|
| 252 |
+
const existing = queue.tasks.find(t => t.threadId === newTask.threadId);
|
| 253 |
+
|
| 254 |
+
if (existing) {
|
| 255 |
+
if (existing.status === 'failed') {
|
| 256 |
+
// Explicit retry: reset to pending, increment retries counter
|
| 257 |
+
existing.status = 'pending';
|
| 258 |
+
existing.retries = (existing.retries || 0) + 1;
|
| 259 |
+
existing.log.push({ ts: new Date().toISOString(), msg: `Retry #${existing.retries}` });
|
| 260 |
+
write(agentId, queue);
|
| 261 |
+
}
|
| 262 |
+
// For any other status: silent no-op (dedup)
|
| 263 |
+
return queue;
|
| 264 |
+
}
|
| 265 |
+
|
| 266 |
+
queue.tasks.push({ retries: 0, log: [], dependsOn: [], ...newTask });
|
| 267 |
+
write(agentId, queue);
|
| 268 |
+
return queue;
|
| 269 |
+
}
|
| 270 |
+
```
|
| 271 |
+
|
| 272 |
+
The same `threadId` arriving twice results in one task. A `failed` task arriving again resets to `pending` with `retries++`. The `retries` field lets the Executor apply exponential backoff or hard-stop after N attempts.
|
| 273 |
+
|
| 274 |
+
---
|
| 275 |
+
|
| 276 |
+
## Per-Task Progress Logging
|
| 277 |
+
|
| 278 |
+
The `log[]` array makes task execution fully observable without any external logging infrastructure:
|
| 279 |
+
|
| 280 |
+
```json
|
| 281 |
+
{
|
| 282 |
+
"id": "task-deploy-prod",
|
| 283 |
+
"status": "done",
|
| 284 |
+
"log": [
|
| 285 |
+
{ "ts": "2026-05-31T10:00:01Z", "msg": "Iniciando: Deploy to prod" },
|
| 286 |
+
{ "ts": "2026-05-31T10:00:08Z", "msg": "SSH connected to 145.239.65.26" },
|
| 287 |
+
{ "ts": "2026-05-31T10:00:31Z", "msg": "docker pull done (847MB)" },
|
| 288 |
+
{ "ts": "2026-05-31T10:00:38Z", "msg": "Containers restarted, health check passed" }
|
| 289 |
+
],
|
| 290 |
+
"result": "Deployed v2.1.4 successfully"
|
| 291 |
+
}
|
| 292 |
+
```
|
| 293 |
+
|
| 294 |
+
Live monitoring: `watch -n1 'cat agent-tasks.json | jq ".tasks[0].log[-3:]"'`
|
| 295 |
+
|
| 296 |
+
No Grafana. No Datadog. The file is the dashboard.
|
| 297 |
+
|
| 298 |
+
---
|
| 299 |
+
|
| 300 |
+
## Crash Recovery
|
| 301 |
+
|
| 302 |
+
When the server restarts, tasks that were `in-progress` (mid-execution) need to be reset. A one-time recovery pass runs at startup:
|
| 303 |
+
|
| 304 |
+
```javascript
|
| 305 |
+
function recoverStaleTasks(agentId) {
|
| 306 |
+
const queue = read(agentId);
|
| 307 |
+
let recovered = 0;
|
| 308 |
+
for (const task of queue.tasks) {
|
| 309 |
+
if (task.status !== 'in-progress') continue;
|
| 310 |
+
task.status = 'pending';
|
| 311 |
+
task.retries = (task.retries || 0) + 1;
|
| 312 |
+
task.log.push({ ts: new Date().toISOString(), msg: 'Recovered from stale in-progress (server restart)' });
|
| 313 |
+
recovered++;
|
| 314 |
+
}
|
| 315 |
+
if (recovered > 0) write(agentId, queue);
|
| 316 |
+
return recovered;
|
| 317 |
+
}
|
| 318 |
+
|
| 319 |
+
// In startPoller():
|
| 320 |
+
function startPoller() {
|
| 321 |
+
const agents = listAgents().filter(a => a.enabled && a.ready);
|
| 322 |
+
for (const a of agents) taskQueue.recoverStaleTasks(a.id);
|
| 323 |
+
// ... start cron jobs
|
| 324 |
+
}
|
| 325 |
+
```
|
| 326 |
+
|
| 327 |
+
A crash mid-deploy becomes a retried deploy, not a lost task.
|
| 328 |
+
|
| 329 |
+
---
|
| 330 |
+
|
| 331 |
+
## Atomic Writes
|
| 332 |
+
|
| 333 |
+
The JSON file is the single source of truth. Corruption on a mid-write crash would break everything. The fix: write to a `.tmp` file, then `rename`:
|
| 334 |
+
|
| 335 |
+
```javascript
|
| 336 |
+
function write(agentId, data) {
|
| 337 |
+
const f = filePath(agentId);
|
| 338 |
+
const tmp = f + '.tmp';
|
| 339 |
+
fs.mkdirSync(path.dirname(f), { recursive: true });
|
| 340 |
+
fs.writeFileSync(tmp, JSON.stringify({ ...data, updatedAt: new Date().toISOString() }, null, 2));
|
| 341 |
+
fs.renameSync(tmp, f); // atomic on POSIX
|
| 342 |
+
}
|
| 343 |
+
```
|
| 344 |
+
|
| 345 |
+
`fs.renameSync` is atomic on POSIX filesystems: readers either see the old file or the new one, never a partial write.
|
| 346 |
|
| 347 |
---
|
| 348 |
|
|
|
|
| 357 |
T+240s Executor tick fires β no pending tasks β skips (noop)
|
| 358 |
```
|
| 359 |
|
| 360 |
+
Concurrency is controlled by in-memory flags that survive the process lifetime:
|
| 361 |
|
| 362 |
```javascript
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 363 |
// Only one Scheduler active per agent at a time
|
| 364 |
+
if (agentSessions.isActive(skillId, 'scheduler')) return null;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 365 |
|
| 366 |
// Only one Executor active per agent at a time
|
| 367 |
+
if (agentSessions.isActive(skillId, 'executor')) return null;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 368 |
```
|
| 369 |
|
| 370 |
+
Crucially: **the Scheduler and Executor can run simultaneously**. While the Executor is working on task #1, the Scheduler can plan tasks #2 and #3.
|
| 371 |
|
| 372 |
---
|
| 373 |
|
|
|
|
| 384 |
'--model', resolvedModel,
|
| 385 |
];
|
| 386 |
if (resumeClaudeId) args.push('--resume', resumeClaudeId);
|
|
|
|
| 387 |
```
|
| 388 |
|
| 389 |
+
The Executor doesn't start cold. It already knows the project structure, conventions, and recent decisions. The more emails processed, the more efficient it becomes β without a database.
|
| 390 |
|
| 391 |
---
|
| 392 |
|
|
|
|
| 396 |
|---------|-------------|-----------------|
|
| 397 |
| New email while executing | Missed until session ends | Scheduler handles it immediately |
|
| 398 |
| Task priority | FIFO only | Explicit priority 1-2-3 |
|
| 399 |
+
| Task dependencies | None | `dependsOn[]` with auto-skip on failure |
|
| 400 |
+
| Partial failure | Whole session fails | Task marked `failed`, next task continues |
|
| 401 |
+
| Crash mid-task | Task lost silently | Reset to `pending` on restart, `retries++` |
|
| 402 |
| Long-running tasks | Blocks everything | Executor runs async, Scheduler stays free |
|
| 403 |
+
| Debugging | One long session, hard to inspect | `agent-tasks.json` + `log[]` per task |
|
| 404 |
+
| Cost control | Hard to limit mid-session | Monthly spend limit checked before each launch |
|
| 405 |
+
| Re-delivered emails | May process twice | Dedup by `threadId`, idempotent |
|
| 406 |
|
| 407 |
---
|
| 408 |
|
|
|
|
| 412 |
|
| 413 |
```javascript
|
| 414 |
if (agent.spendingLimitMonthly != null) {
|
| 415 |
+
const spent = await getMonthlySpend(skillId); // async β must be awaited
|
| 416 |
if (spent >= agent.spendingLimitMonthly) {
|
| 417 |
console.warn(`monthly limit $${agent.spendingLimitMonthly} reached β launch blocked`);
|
| 418 |
return null;
|
|
|
|
| 420 |
}
|
| 421 |
```
|
| 422 |
|
| 423 |
+
The Planner is cheap (reads email, writes JSON β a few cents). The Executor is where real work β and cost β happens. Checking before each launch gives per-session cost granularity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 424 |
|
| 425 |
---
|
| 426 |
|
| 427 |
## Complete Flow Diagram
|
| 428 |
|
| 429 |
```
|
| 430 |
+
Inbox (IMAP/Gmail)
|
| 431 |
β
|
| 432 |
β (polled every 60s)
|
| 433 |
βΌ
|
|
|
|
| 443 |
β (Claude CLI, ROL: PLANIFICADOR)
|
| 444 |
β reads email thread via mail_client.py
|
| 445 |
β reads agent-tasks.json
|
| 446 |
+
β deduplicates by threadId
|
| 447 |
+
β appends tasks with priority + dependsOn
|
| 448 |
+
β writes agent-tasks.json (atomic)
|
| 449 |
ββ exits
|
| 450 |
|
| 451 |
(2 min later...)
|
| 452 |
|
| 453 |
tickExecutor()
|
| 454 |
β
|
| 455 |
+
ββ hasPendingReady(agentId)? β no β skip
|
| 456 |
β
|
| 457 |
ββ yes
|
| 458 |
β
|
|
|
|
| 461 |
β
|
| 462 |
β (Claude CLI, ROL: EJECUTOR)
|
| 463 |
β reads agent-tasks.json
|
| 464 |
+
β picks highest-priority pending task with deps satisfied
|
| 465 |
+
β marks in-progress, appends to log[]
|
| 466 |
β executes (code, email reply, API call, deploy...)
|
| 467 |
+
β marks done/failed with result + final log entry
|
| 468 |
+
β loops until queue empty or no more executable tasks
|
| 469 |
ββ exits
|
| 470 |
```
|
| 471 |
|
| 472 |
---
|
| 473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 474 |
## Implementation in ClonAgent
|
| 475 |
|
| 476 |
The full implementation is open source:
|
| 477 |
|
| 478 |
| File | Role |
|
| 479 |
|------|------|
|
| 480 |
+
| [`server/lib/gmail-poller.js`](https://github.com/KikoCisBot/clonagent/blob/main/server/lib/gmail-poller.js) | Orchestrator: poller ticks, triggers Scheduler and Executor, crash recovery on startup |
|
| 481 |
+
| [`server/lib/relay-client.js`](https://github.com/KikoCisBot/clonagent/blob/main/server/lib/relay-client.js) | Launches Scheduler and Executor via Claude CLI with role-specific prompts |
|
| 482 |
+
| [`server/lib/task-queue.js`](https://github.com/KikoCisBot/clonagent/blob/main/server/lib/task-queue.js) | Atomic reads/writes of `agent-tasks.json`, idempotent `addTask`, dependency-aware `getNextTask`, crash recovery |
|
| 483 |
| [`server/lib/agent-sessions.js`](https://github.com/KikoCisBot/clonagent/blob/main/server/lib/agent-sessions.js) | Tracks active Scheduler/Executor sessions, prevents overlaps |
|
| 484 |
|
| 485 |
---
|
|
|
|
| 490 |
|
| 491 |
The key insight is that **planning and execution are different cognitive tasks** that benefit from separation β not just conceptually, but as separate model invocations with different prompts, different time horizons, and different failure modes.
|
| 492 |
|
| 493 |
+
Production use has taught us additional lessons:
|
| 494 |
+
|
| 495 |
+
- **Atomic writes** (temp + rename) prevent file corruption that would break the whole agent
|
| 496 |
+
- **Idempotency by `threadId`** is mandatory β email systems re-deliver, networks retry
|
| 497 |
+
- **`log[]` per task** makes debugging possible without any external infrastructure
|
| 498 |
+
- **`dependsOn[]`** enables multi-step workflows without Airflow or Temporal
|
| 499 |
+
- **Crash recovery** at startup means a server restart doesn't lose work in progress
|
| 500 |
+
- **`await` the spend check** β async bugs here mean spending limits silently don't apply
|
| 501 |
+
|
| 502 |
+
A shared JSON file replaces complex message queue infrastructure. Claude CLI's `--resume` flag provides session continuity without a database. Explicit priority and dependency fields give the agent the ability to triage and sequence, just like a human would.
|
| 503 |
|
| 504 |
+
The result is an agent that feels less like a script and more like a colleague: it reads your email, decides what matters, plans the work, and executes β without blocking, without crashing, and without forgetting what it learned yesterday.
|
| 505 |
|
| 506 |
---
|
| 507 |
|