--- license: other pretty_name: LIT-PCBA Docked Poses (gnina virtual screening) tags: - chemistry - molecular-docking - virtual-screening - drug-discovery - gnina - lit-pcba configs: - config_name: default data_files: - split: train path: litpcba_gnina_scores.parquet --- # LIT-PCBA Docked Poses (gnina virtual screening) The docked poses from `lit-pcba_vs.tgz`, produced by the Koes lab at the University of Pittsburgh for *Virtual Screening with Gnina 1.0*. The original is one large archive that must be read start to finish. Here it is split by target into `lit-pcba-vs/`, one archive per LIT-PCBA target, so you can download only the targets you need: ```bash hf download Kingldore/lit-pcba-vs lit-pcba-vs/FEN1.tar.gz --repo-type dataset tar -xzf lit-pcba-vs/FEN1.tar.gz ``` 15 targets, 833 GB in total. The contents are unchanged from the original; only the packaging differs. ## Cross-docking Unlike DUD-E, LIT-PCBA targets have several crystal structures (1 to 15 per target), and every screening compound was docked into *every* structure for its target, not just one. So a compound has one score per receptor structure it was docked into, not one score total — the row key below is `(target, receptor_pdb, compound_id)`. Each archive also contains a small number of redock files, where a structure's own co-crystallized ligand is re-docked into every structure for that target. These are a pose-recovery check, not screening compounds — they carry no active/decoy label and are left out of the score table below. ## Score table `litpcba_gnina_scores.parquet` summarises every docked pose into one row per `(target, receptor_pdb, compound_id)` — 16,672,528 rows, 74,950 actives and 16,597,578 inactives. | column | meaning | |---|---| | `protein_id` | LIT-PCBA target name | | `receptor_pdb` | archive path to the receptor structure this row was docked against | | `compound_id` | PubChem CID | | `label` | 1 = active, 0 = inactive | | `n_poses` | poses the statistics were computed over | | `gnina_best_*` | value at the pose with the highest CNNscore | | `gnina_mean_*`, `gnina_std_*` | mean and population standard deviation over all poses | | `docked_pose_sdf_path` | archive path to the SDF containing this compound's poses against this receptor | The three score families are `minimized_affinity`, `cnn_score`, and `cnn_affinity`. `minimized_affinity` is the empirical docking score, from the column gnina's summary files label `Vina`. All three `gnina_best_*` values come from the **same** pose — the one with the highest CNNscore — rather than each column being maximised independently. `gnina_std_*` is null for compounds with a single pose. One row (IDH1) has a null `gnina_best_cnn_score`/`gnina_best_cnn_affinity`: gnina's own scoring output was missing those two values for that pose. **Original download:** ## Citation Please cite both the method and the underlying benchmark. **gnina virtual screening** — the source of these docked poses: ```bibtex @article{sunseri2021virtual, title = {Virtual Screening with Gnina 1.0}, author = {Sunseri, Jocelyn and Koes, David Ryan}, journal = {Molecules}, volume = {26}, number = {23}, pages = {7369}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.3390/molecules26237369} } ``` **LIT-PCBA** — the benchmark set that was docked: ```bibtex @article{tran2020lit, title = {LIT-PCBA: An Unbiased Data Set for Machine Learning and Virtual Screening}, author = {Tran-Nguyen, Viet-Khoa and Jacquemard, C{\'e}line and Rognan, Didier}, journal = {Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling}, volume = {60}, number = {9}, pages = {4263--4273}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00155} } ``` ## Links - Paper: - LIT-PCBA paper: - gnina software: - LIT-PCBA: - Koes lab file index: ## License This is a mirror hosted for convenience; the data belongs to its original authors and no additional licence is granted here.