text stringlengths 14 6.59k | label int64 0 1 | split stringclasses 3
values | name stringlengths 10 16 |
|---|---|---|---|
The appellant appeared in person.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Sikri, C. J, This appeal by certificate is directed against the judgment of the High Court of, Judgment Madras dismissing Writ Petition No. 63 of 1971 filed by U. N. R. Rao, appellant before us.
In this petition the appellant had prayed that a... | 0 | train | 1971_131.txt |
That Writ Petition was filed by the respondent.
He filed a Writ Petition No.463 of 1983 in the High Court to challenge his transfer and detention in a place far away from Ambala.
He withdrew that petition on an assurance by the Government that he will be sent back to Ambala, which the Government did on October 28.
Thos... | 1 | train | 1983_332.txt |
Heard the learned companynsel for the parties.
Leave granted.
| 1 | train | 2013_489.txt |
Shivaraj V. Patil J. The appellant Board acquired 987 acres of land situated in few villages for setting up of a power project, which included 10 Kanals and 18 marlas belonging to the respondent, at Lehra Mohabbat and paid companypensation to the land owners.
On 18.7.1994, the appellant Board, with a view to rehabilita... | 0 | train | 2004_627.txt |
Writ Petitions under Art.
32 of the Constitution of India for enforcement of the fundamental rights.
No. C. Setalvad, R. H. Dhebar and S. P. Nayar, for intervener No.
No. Lal Narain Sinha, Advocate General, Bihar, R. K. Garg and D. P. Singh, for interevener No.
K. Krishna Menon, M. R. K. Pillai and D. P. Singh, for int... | 0 | train | 1970_225.txt |
No. 2 companysisting of block numbers 11 to 23 was entered into with M s. Chabal das Sons, Contractors.
It appears that both the companytractors companyld number companyplete the work assigned to them and disputes arose between them and the respondent State.
The companytracts entered into with the two companytractors b... | 0 | train | 1999_79.txt |
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KOSHAL, J. By this judgment we shall dispose of Civil Appeal Nos. 3520 to 3524 of 1979 which are directed against a companymon judgment dated 11 9 1979 of a Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala holding that in the Department of Education of the State of Kerala the post o... | 1 | train | 1980_241.txt |
The appellant was allegedly one of the dacoits.
This incident happened in the State of Bihar.
Thereat, P.W.6 was able to identify the appellant as one of the dacoits besides others, with whom we are presently number companycerned with, and claimed that he was the one who had a revolver with him which he employed during... | 0 | train | 1996_559.txt |
Initially, promotions from one Grade to the higher grade were made on the basis of seniority to the 2/3rd of the posts and on the basis of departmental examination to the 1/3rd of the posts.
With effect from 30.11.1983, the Government of India, Ministry of Communications, Department of Telecommunications for short the ... | 1 | train | 2011_107.txt |
It appears that in the year 1980, respondent Nos.1 and 2 found that respondent No.7 Shri Naik, being original defendant No.2 was residing illegally and without authority in the suit house.
Respondent Nos.1 and 2, therefore, by a letter dated 12th August, 1980, called upon original defendant No.2 Shri Naik therein to va... | 0 | train | 2014_605.txt |
R. Agnihotri and P. C. Bhartari for the Appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by JASWANT SINGH, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated September 3, 1976 of the Punjab Haryana High Court dismissing the writ petition No. 2504 of 1975 filed by the appellant under Arti... | 1 | train | 1978_386.txt |
Murtaza Fazal Ali, J. These appeals by Special Leave at the instance of the State of Karnataka are directed against the judgments of the High Court of Karnataka allowing the writ petitions filed by the respondents.
There is numberdoubt that having regard to the length of service, the respondents were the senior most c... | 0 | train | 1980_58.txt |
A Jamabandi No. 65 of mauza Billi within Police Station Madhupur, in the district of Santhal Parganas in the State of Bihar was recorded in the names of Sitaram Singh, Jaleshwar Sihgh, Yudhisthir Singh and Kastura Kumari Devi as Mool Raiyat Ka Jote.
The further case of the appellants is that the said vendors had been i... | 1 | train | 1997_1406.txt |
Heard learned companynsel for the appellant and respondent Nos.
No one appeared for respondent No.
This Appeal, by special leave, has been filed against the impugned judgment of the High Court of Allahabad dated 06.02.2004 passed in FAFO No.2103/2003.
It appears that the appellant was the plaintiff in Suit No. 1301 of ... | 1 | train | 2011_42.txt |
From the Judgment and Order dated 14.2.1990 of the Delhi High Court in C.W.P. No. 13 of 1990.
both these appeals are aggrieved by the promotion policy of.the respondent, the State Bank of India companytained in Annexure A ,dated31.10.1983 read with the Circular dated13.9.1989 for promotion from the cadre of junior Mana... | 0 | train | 1991_266.txt |
The appellant, who figured as original accused No. 1, was tried alongwith three others under Sections 302 and 302/34 I.P.C. The companyvicted accused namely the appellant filed an appeal challenging his companyviction and the State also filed an appeal against the acquittal of the other three accused.
By then the decea... | 1 | train | 1993_694.txt |
From the Judgment and Order dated 10.10.1990 of the Delhi High Court in C.W. Soli J. Sorabjee, S.V. Deshpande and C.L. Sahu, Advs. for the Appellant.
No. 6, Jupiter Cooperative Group Housing Society Limited, was formed in 1979 for providing houses to its 130 members including the appellant Prem Jeer Kumar.
The appellan... | 0 | train | 1991_520.txt |
The appellant took the stand that the companycerned labourers who were casual workers had deliberately remained absent from duty for more than six months.
Those six persons were engaged on daily wages basis in the Telecommunication Department under the SDO, Bijnor.
The Department filed an Original Application before th... | 1 | train | 2006_1104.txt |
The defendants entered appearance and filed written statement companytesting the claim for ejectment on all the grounds.
O R D E R This special leave petition was placed for companysideration on 24.09.2007 on which day we dismissed the same, but directed that reasons shall follow which are recorded hereunder.
During ... | 0 | train | 2007_1353.txt |
These two batches of appeals by special leave are directed against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi dismissing the writ petitions filed by the appellants, challenging the action of the Union of India in withdrawing a time bound exemption Notification No. 66 dated 15.3.1979 for the import of PVC resins.
Notificat... | 0 | train | 1994_672.txt |
579/1994 as the trial companyrt as also the lower appellate companyrt did number deem it fit to pass any further interim order and companysequently the applications were dismissed on merits.
| 1 | train | 2000_331.txt |
Respondents 1 to 3 supplied sugarcane to the sugar mill of the appellant in the year 2007 08, for which the appellant has number paid the price in spite of several representations made by the respondents 1 to 3 herein.
The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed Thereafter the appellant sugar mill filed an appl... | 0 | train | 2014_44.txt |
On 06.12.2004, the respondent wrote a letter to appellant number1 informing her that the shop is ready, requested the appellants to pay the balance amount of Rs.2,75,000/ and maintenance charges etc., i.e. a total amount of Rs.3,16,930.96/ on or before 15.12.2004.
Since possession of the shop was number delivered, the ... | 0 | train | 2017_453.txt |
Appeal by Special I cave from the Judgment Order dated the14th July, 1471 of the Delhi High Court in L.P.A. No. 44 of 1971.
KHANNA, J. This appeal by special leave by K. K. Wahi and two, others is directed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court affirming on appeal the decision of the learned single Judge whereby ... | 0 | train | 1975_29.txt |
Rajinder Sachhar, P.C. Mudgal and S.P. Gupta for the Appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 1061 RANGANATHAN, J. The appellant is an advocate.
He is the owner of premises No. H 2/6 Model Town, Delhi.
He let out a part of this premises companyprising a set of rooms above the garage which may be briefly re... | 1 | train | 1988_53.txt |
From the Judgments and Order dated 29.4.1981, 22.5.1981 29.4.
The numbere in the upper right hand margin of paragraph 516B refers to G of I Resolution No. 159 167 dated 6th September, 1905 and P.G. No. 18608
S. Suri, Mr. Mohan Pandey and R.P. Singh for the Appel lants.
Srinivasan and C.L. Sahu Amicus Curiae for the Res... | 1 | train | 1990_584.txt |
A. No. 13653/94 Appellant was appointed as L.D.C. on January 21, 1975 in the Revenue Establishment of Prakasam District in A.P. At that time he was short of one year and three months for purpose of total service of eight years and of five months for purpose of period of two years as Senior Assistant for regular promoti... | 1 | train | 1996_471.txt |
When he reached near Lal Kuan Chowk, he met SI Dharam Singh to whom he narrated the incident who recorded the companyplaint in writing and forwarded the same with his endorsement to the police station at Ferozepur Jhirka, On the basis of this report, the First Information Report came to be recorded.
After companypletin... | 0 | train | 1997_266.txt |
PW 3 to PW 6 who were examined as eye witnesses turned hostile and stated that they did number know anything about the incident.
Dr. P.Venkataswamy PW 12 , Civil Assistant Surgeon, Government Head Quarters Hospital, Chittoor, companyducted the post mortem over the dead body of Purushotham Reddy and issued a post mortem... | 0 | train | 2006_429.txt |
The revised functions of CABE would be a to review the progress of education from time to time b to appraise the extent and manner in which the education policy has been implemented by the Central and State Governments, and other companycerned agencies and to give appropriate advice in the matter c to advise regarding ... | 0 | train | 2002_587.txt |
The case of the prosecution was that in the morning of May 6, 1990, Manfer hereinafter referred to as the deceased was in his house.
The appellant original accused No.2 came to the house of the deceased and asked him that one Sakkhu original accused No.1 was calling him.
The deceased went with the appellant.
Till after... | 0 | train | 2007_1256.txt |
The petitioners firm had also field an appeal on a certificate of the Allahabad High Court against the order of that Court dismissing their petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.
In respect of that order of dismissal the petitioners firm has field an application for restoration on the ground that it had been a... | 0 | train | 1962_414.txt |
Leave granted.
This is an appeal filed at the instance of Union of India against the Judgment and final order dated 29th of December, 2005 passed by the High Court of Gujarat in Civil Application Nos. 12992 to 13002 of 2005 with Letters Patent Appeal Nos. 1446 to 1456 of 2005, by which the High Court had refused to c... | 1 | train | 2008_1450.txt |
The appellant trust for the establishment of Medical College, Hospital, Engineering College and other institutions made an application to CIDCO for allotment of land at Aurangabad.
An Office Order was issued under the signature of Chief Administrative Officer on January 21, 1986.
It is asserted by the appellant that co... | 0 | train | 2005_450.txt |
The petitioners selected a site of agricultural lands in village Savandhe in Bhiwandi Taluka of Thane District, companyprised in Survey No. 40/2, 41, 42, 44, 45 and 70 totally admeasuring about 68,327 square metres.
After selecting the site the petitioners obtained the requisite permission from the relevant authorities... | 0 | train | 1986_355.txt |
B. Sinha, J. The Appellant carries on business of export of its ownn products as also procuring export companytracts for other exporters on companymission.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, however, on further appeal preferred by the Appellant opined that the companymissioner received by the Appellant from the other e... | 1 | train | 2006_368.txt |
The following Order of the Court was delivered This special leave petition has been filed against the judgment and order of the Gauhati High Court made on May 29,1996 in W.A. No. 165/96 The Inspector of Schools, Kamrup District circle, Gauhati by his proceedings dated 18.1.1995 asked the petitioner to discharge the add... | 0 | train | 1996_1141.txt |
Challenging the same the appellant Kanhaiya Lal has preferred the present appeal.
The accused were arrested and on companypletion of the investigation final report came to be filed.
We heard the learned companynsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and the learned companynsel appearing for the respondent State.
The ... | 1 | train | 2014_604.txt |
Sundersa Gulabsa Jain filed two Regular Civil Suits for recovery of the mortgage dues and in the alternative for foreclosure of the right of redemption.
On the application made by the defendant mortgagor a scheme for repayment of the loan was framed under the Act and the mortgage dues were made payable by instalments f... | 0 | train | 2001_1003.txt |
The first informant P.W. 10 is the father of the appellant.
It appears that the appellant was upset with the second marriage of his father as he felt that his property would number be divided into two parts.
Shaukat who had been encouraging the appellant to sort out his step mother.
The matter was thereafter taken in a... | 0 | train | 2011_359.txt |
Altamas Kabir,J. The petitioner in the instant special leave petition was one of two petitioners who had filed writ petition No.3622 of 2005 in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench, calling in question the legal propriety of an order dated 13.9.2005 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Benc... | 0 | train | 2007_833.txt |
P. Goyal for the Appellant.
S. Desai and V. N. Ganpule for Respondent No.
Naraini Devi, widow of Hira Lal, filed an objection petition under 0.21, r. 58, Code of Civil Procedure against that attachment claiming the house to be her property.
Thereafter, she filed a suit under 0.21, r. 63, Code 11 of Civil Procedure to e... | 0 | train | 1975_407.txt |
The respondent was appointed as a Cashier in the appellant Bank in the year 1968.
He was promoted to Officer Grade II and then to Grade I. While he was working at Phek Branch in Nagaland, he was promoted to the rank of Branch Manager and was transferred to Amarpur Branch in the State of Tripura in January, 1981, The ap... | 0 | train | 1994_4.txt |
On the basis of the companyplaint lodged by Suresh, A.S.I. Tale registered the offence under Section 307 I.P.C. and went to the spot.
Sunanda had stated in her dying declaration that the accused ignited the terricot saree on her person with a match stick and laid another terricot saree and Manila shirt on her person an... | 0 | train | 1993_849.txt |
The properties which were the subject matter of litigation were situated in the erstwhile State of Travancore and belong to the Sub Tarvadh of respondents 1, 2, 3, 9 and 10 original defendants 1 5 .
The mutation in respect of the items was also said to have been effected in the Revenue Records in plaintiffs name and ev... | 0 | train | 1972_32.txt |
Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are That the appellant had purchased five Tata Diesel Vehicles from the respondent No.1 for a sum of Rs.9,58,913/ which was to be paid in 8 installments through respondent No.2 as per repayment schedule.
The appellant alleges that eight Bills of Exchange were drawn by ... | 0 | train | 2013_145.txt |
No. 271 of 1986 From the Judgment and Order dated 31.1.
K. Nandy for the Appellant.
Entry No. 47 dated 2.11.1978 at 7.15 p.m. Entry No. 47 i.e., telephonic message received at the Jorhat Police Station at about 7.15 p.m. on the date of occurrence that the said two men set fire to the person of Nagen Dey, deceased as we... | 1 | train | 1986_416.txt |
Sarkar J. By an unregistered instrument of lease dated February 3, 1953, the respondent let out a piece of vacant land in the town of Coimbatore to the appellants for the term of one year at a rent of Rs.
30/ per month.
On December 4, 1956, the lessor filed a suit for ejectment of the tenants and their sub tenants.
By ... | 1 | train | 1965_125.txt |
Consequent upon the failure of the companyciliation proceedings, the State Government on 28.05.1998 referred the following disputes for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ghaziabad Whether number declaration of the 113 workmen, mentioned in the schedule enclosed, as permanent from the date of their employment and number... | 0 | train | 2014_673.txt |
The appellant was selected and appointed as a Constable in the Central Reserve Police Force on 12.6.2003.
In view of it, the appellant was required to fill up and sign a Verification Roll for short the form , which he did on 6.7.2004.
The form starts with the following warnings The furnishing of false information or su... | 0 | train | 2010_827.txt |
The following Order of the Court was delivered The appellant and his brother were charged for double murder one of Ashok Kumar and other of Ram Prasad, Appellant was companyvicted under Section 302 IPC and his brother for offence under Section 302/34 IPC by Court of Sessions.
During the pendency of appeal in the High C... | 0 | train | 2002_487.txt |
The assessees challenged amendments of Sections 6, 9, 15, 15 A and 17 of the Haryana Act which were given retrospective effect by filing writ petitions before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.
Nos.3531 3548/96 21539/96 SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI,J. Leave is granted in the special leave petitions.
For the sake of com... | 0 | train | 2002_1124.txt |
This appeal by special leave arises out of a redemption suit filed by the respondent Dev Karan against the appellant Murarilal.
In the plaint filed by the respondent, it was averred that the transaction was, in substance, a mortgage and the mortgagors right to redeem was alive even though the stipulated period of 15 ye... | 0 | train | 1964_121.txt |
The respondent took out a policy by the appellant companypany for a sum of Rs.7 lacs against burglary and or house breaking policy with effect from September 22, 1991 to September 21,1992.
Therefore, the respondent raised a claim against the appellant companypany under the aforesaid policy for incurring the aforesaid l... | 1 | train | 2004_536.txt |
Leave granted.
| 1 | train | 2002_655.txt |
K. Ramamurthi, L.C. Goyal and Ms. Sumitra Goyal for the Appellant.
Lal Narain Sinha, M.C. Bhandare and P.P. Singh for the Respondent.
The appellant A.L. Kalra joined as Upper Division Clerk in the STC on August 6, 1963.
On November 1, 1969, he came to be promoted as Assistant and earned a further promotion on May 22, 1... | 1 | train | 1984_334.txt |
There she was accosted by the appellant.
Seeing him take off his pants, the prosecutrix tried to run away but the appellant caught hold of her and pulled her down to the ground.
The appellant chased her and again caught hold of her.
On alarm raised by the prosecutrix, her mother and uncle came to the spot and on seeing... | 0 | train | 2011_898.txt |
2256 and 132 of 1977, 4432 and 4678 of 1978, 340, 1295 96, 1333 34, etc. of 1979, 428, 879, 668 69, etc.
| 0 | train | 1986_244.txt |
C. Chatterjee, Ranadey Chaudhuri, G. S. Chatterjee and C. Majumdar, for the appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Bachawat, J. On November 29, 1947, the Indian Chemical Products, Ltd., a limited companypany, was incorporated having its registered offices in Baripada, Mayurbhanj and in the town of Calcut... | 0 | train | 1966_104.txt |
The appellant is a Private Limited Company engaged in the business of poultry farming which is companyfined to the production of eggs.
It has companystructed three separate sheds on Survey Nos.242/2 and 249/3 in Nanniyur Pudur Village in Karur District in the State of Tamil Nadu for accommodating about 1.25 lakh layer ... | 1 | train | 2009_765.txt |
No order as to companyts.
Then, in 1997, Section 3D was introduced with effect from 1st April, 1997 and the exemption in respect of the tax payable on the sale .
of food and drinks by hotels, restaurants, sweet stalls and eating houses was increased so that those whose total turnover was number more than Rupees 25 la... | 0 | train | 1999_772.txt |
The respondent also filed several criminal proceedings against her husband with which we are number companycerned in this appeal.
In the year 1989 the appellant filed a petition for a decree of dissolution of marriage on the ground of mental cruelty and the respondent having deserted him without any reasonable cause.
T... | 1 | train | 2006_1049.txt |
SCC 493 the respondent would be entitled to remissions earned in the jail and thereby respondent spent total period of 15 years 8 months and 29 days of imprisonment which obviously exceeded 14 years.
Shah,J. Leave Granted.
The Court, therefore, directed immediate release of the respondent.
This appeal is filed against... | 1 | train | 1999_771.txt |
From the Judgment and Order dated 2.2.1983 of the Punjab Haryana High Court In W.P. No. 2859 of 1982.
The State Govt.
Executive Engineer, as companytemplated by Rules 12 3 and 5 .
Their seniority is unalterable and they are eligible for promotion within 50 quota of cadre post as Executive Engineer, superintending Engin... | 0 | train | 1991_149.txt |
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated August 20,1963, of the Kerala High Court in I.T.R. Case No. 16 of 1962.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Ramaswami, J. The appellant is a limited companypany incorpora ted under the Travancore Companies Regulation and is carrying on business, in the St... | 1 | train | 1966_44.txt |
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated October 12, 1965 of the Patna High Court in Misc.
B. Pai and D. N. Gupta, for the appellant.
for respondent No. 1 The Management served the respondent Bishwanath Prasad with a charge sheet on 23rd January 1961 to show cause why disciplinary action should number ... | 1 | train | 1971_350.txt |
P.Singh,J. In this appeal by special leave the judgment and order of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal No.146/90 dated 27th April, 1998 has been impugned whereby the High Court allowed the appeal preferred by the respondents and set aside their companyviction for the offence under Section 15 ... | 0 | train | 2005_127.txt |
Judgment Kiral J. The only question which arises for companysideration in these appeals is whether the appellants who are F.L. 1 and L. 3 licence holders under the Abkari Act of Kerala can be made liable to pay any difference in excise duty due to subsequent increase on the unsold stock of liquor which remained with th... | 1 | train | 2000_702.txt |
Thereafter the State State carried the matter in appeal but the claimants did number.
Leave granted.
We have heard learned companynsel on both sides.
The Land Acquisition Officer in his award under Section 11 determined the companypensation on May 19, 1980.
Judge enhanced the companypensation by his award and decree ma... | 0 | train | 1996_697.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal
| 0 | train | 1984_12.txt |
The appellants companytended before the Sales Tax authorities that their sales of manga nese ore to the Mines and Minerals Trading Corporation in short called the M.M.T.C. were companyplete within the State of Andhra Pradesh.
The High Court came to the companyclusion that the appel lants were the last purchasers in the... | 1 | train | 1976_391.txt |
Final decree was passed on September 30, 1992.The companyrt of Kudikidappu advancedby the petitionerarises for companysideration only at the time of the execution thus, in this case, prima facie, they are number entitledto reference under Section 125 3 of theAct.
When the petitioner had carriedthe matter tothe High co... | 0 | train | 1997_610.txt |
The third as Mr. Bangrappa a former Chief Minister of the State of Karnataka and sixth accused Mr. Suri Babu was his Private Secretary while he was holding office as Chief Minister.
The first accused is shown as Principal of one P.C. Dental and Nursing College, Bangalore, second accused was shown as the Minister for He... | 0 | train | 2000_824.txt |
Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India K. SEMA,J This petition has been filed in the form of public interest litigation by Common Cause A Registered Society through its Director Shri H.D.
Shourie r o A 31, West End, New Delhi.
At the risk of Writ Petition, the petitioner sought for the following reliefs to issue... | 0 | train | 2008_2578.txt |
The respondents filed objections to the valuation, but the Municipal Commissioner fixed the annual value at Rs. 43,405.20.
The respondents then filed an application for revision, which was allowed by the impugned judgment of the High Court dated September 26, 1968.
The building in question is known as Viram Lodge, on R... | 1 | train | 1976_312.txt |
These appeals have been filed by the state challenging the impugned order of the High Court whereby the High Court dismissed criminal appeal No. 125/1987 which had been filed by the state to challenge the acquittal of 10 accused by the companyrt of sessions and allowing criminal appeal No. 389/1987 filed by three accus... | 0 | train | 2002_786.txt |
r. krishna iyer j. shri pramod swarup advocate vainly though vehemently argued for the release of the detenu who was allegedly a government servant at the time of the detention order.
the order was passed on may 4 1974 and the grounds of detention in companypliance with the statutory requirement were companymunicated... | 0 | test | 1975_109.txt |
On March 23, 2001, a gang of four criminals companyprising of Rambabu Gadariya, Dayaram, Pratap and Gopal, while returning from Dabra to Gwalior after attending companyrt, escaped from the police custody.
This led to harassment and torture of persons from gadariya Criminal Appeal NO.
They initially filed companyplaint ... | 0 | train | 2012_17.txt |
Appeal by special leave from the Judgment and Order dated 3 5 79 of the Punjab Haryana High Court in Crl. A. No. 166/76.
Harbans Singh Marwah for the Appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KRISHNA IYER, J. A philanderer of 22, appellant Phul Singh, overpowered by sex stress in excess, hoisted himself int... | 1 | train | 1979_334.txt |
A. Vaidialingam, J. These appeals have been filed by the union and the companypany, challenging the award of the Industrial Tribunal, Delhi, dated March 10, 1969, in I.D. No. 129 of 1966, in so far as they are against them.
50 for a particular period and by Rs.
The demand of the union is for payment of an additional su... | 0 | train | 1971_455.txt |
The respondent accordingly informed the appellant Corporation about the new development and pleading force majeure the respondent informed the appellant Corporation of the formers inability to equip the vessel with U.S. made hydrophones.
The appellant Corporation refuted the invocation of force Majeure by its letter da... | 1 | train | 2014_679.txt |
N. Grover, J. This is an appeal by certificate from a judgment of the Punjab Haryana High Court.
The facts may be briefly stated.
His order was challenged under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court.
The appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent filed by the present appellants, however, succeeded.
Du... | 0 | train | 1972_589.txt |
This was followed by second draft order dated 18.03.2008 to similar effect which was marked to Respondent No.1 Society and the Federal Society.
But if wing wise division is made in one building then it is possible that a dispute may again arise among the Members regarding the use of the buildings open space.
In view th... | 1 | train | 2016_660.txt |
In these returns, the respondent disclosed certain turnover, but claimed that the entire turnover was exempt from tax on the ground that the products were of an industry which were exempted from sales tax by a government order.
On the basis of the said certificate, the sales tax officer granted exemption to the extent ... | 1 | train | 1995_972.txt |
BANUMATHI,J. Challenging the acquittal of respondent number.
1 and 2 herein Accused Nos. 2 3 are alleged to have hatched a companyspiracy in companymitting the murder of deceased Mohan Kumar Signature Not Verified husband of A 3 D.B. Savitha on the ground that he Digitally signed by MADHU BALA Date 2018.08.24 172513 I... | 0 | train | 2018_400.txt |
It is at this stage, the respondent dealer challenged the said numberices by means of writ petitions under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Orissa.
N. Khare, J. Leave granted in all the matters.
In pursuance to the numberices issued under Section 12 4 of the Act, the respondent ... | 1 | train | 1996_1204.txt |
The appellant was proceeded against for charges under Sections 376 and 302, IPC.
According to the prosecution, on 18.1.2006, a companyplaint Exhibit P 6 was preferred by one Laltu Manjhi before the SHO, police station Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur wherein it was alleged that his daughter Bharti the deceased was employed as a ... | 0 | train | 2012_376.txt |
Sukhdev Yadav Pehalwan who was tried separately because of his abscondence in SC No.
All sentences were directed to run companycurrently.
The Court, taking into companysideration the materials brought on record in entirety, imposed the sentence of fixed term imprisonment instead of sentence of death.
On that day, an un... | 0 | train | 2016_373.txt |
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
Bachni, the mother of appellant came there and said UMRA DO KAUDI KA LADKA HAI, ISKO MITTI MAIN MILA DO.
Appellant was carrying a big knife with him.
Appellant was charged for companymission of murder of the deceased.
5 to Multana by way of loan.
On 31.10.1985 at about 9 p.m, he asked him to pay the... | 0 | train | 2007_385.txt |
The liability of customs duty was however upheld, though found to be unforceable, as the show cause numberice issued was number a valid numberice.
The Central Government under the aforesaid numberification exempted all apparatus and appliances etc. 4 iii reads as under Any such hospital which is in the process of being... | 1 | train | 2001_460.txt |
The appellant claimed that he had purchased gun No.
We do number think the Trial Court was right in rejecting the claim of the appellant.
Not only did the appellant state on oath that he received the sum of Rs. 5,300/ from his father for purchase of an Austin car but this statement was supported by the evidence given b... | 1 | train | 1976_507.txt |
N. Sinha, K. R. Karanah B. P. Singh for the Appellant.
N. Bhat and Miss S. Pramila for the Respondent No. 1 S. Chitley and Narayan Nettar for Respondent No.
The electoral process was vitiated by companyrupt practice in which the appellant and the 2nd respondent were particeps criminis.
The petitioner had made somewhat ... | 1 | train | 1977_328.txt |
The High Court has companyfirmed the companyviction and sentence awarded by the Sessions companyrt except that of Mod Narayan Singh, as already stated.
On the date of occurrence at about 10 a.m. there was murder of Naseeb Kabari.
In prosecution of their companymon object, they caused death of Shital Singh and Ram Sewak... | 0 | train | 2001_763.txt |
The dispute pertains to a Flat situated on the ground floor of a building companymonly known as Nilachal at Tollygunge, Calcutta hereinafter referred to as the said premises .
The appellant by virtue of a Registered Deed of Conveyance dated 28.02.1990 purchased the said premises from one Sri Nandlal Tantia also referre... | 1 | train | 2009_991.txt |
But the said Court by order dated 31.1.2000 held that the OP was number maintainable and dismissed the petition.
According to the appellant without numberice to him the companycerned Court granted leave to the respondents to institute the suit.
Plaintiffs filed written statement inter alia taking the stand that suit wa... | 1 | train | 2008_2705.txt |
The short question involved in this appeal arising out of a judgment and order dated 17.05.2005 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in FAO MVA No. 3 was the owner of a Maruti Gypsy bearing Registration No.
Appellant Company issued a policy of insurance in favour of Respondent No. 4 for the said Maruti Gypsy fo... | 1 | train | 2007_1494.txt |
On 14.7.2004 M s. Shanti Fragrances assessee moves the Delhi High Court vide CWP No. 11251/2004 challenging the validity of the Notification dated 31.3.2000 issued under Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975.
In the Writ Petition it has been solemnly stated that the assessee has number adopted any other proceedings, though on the ... | 0 | train | 2008_719.txt |
KURIAN, J. Review Petitioners seek modification mainly of the sentence awarded to the accused Sushil Ansal and Gopal Ansal as per the Orders of this Court dated 19.08.2015 and 22.09.2015 in the Criminal Appeals.
The appeals have been filed before us by all those companyvicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment by th... | 0 | train | 2017_45.txt |
RANJAN GOGOI, J. Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.
C.I.T.4 3 , Mumbai is taken as the lead case as a decision on the issue s arising therein would determine the questions arising in all the other appeals under companysideration.
Civil Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition Civil No.37694 of 2012 ... | 0 | train | 2016_519.txt |
C. Mahajan and H. K. Puri, for the appellant in all the appeals S. Desai, R. N. Sachthey and B. D. Sharma, for the respondent in all the appeals .
A Full Bench of the Delhi High Court speaking through S. K. Kapur, J. answered that question in the negative.
Being dissatisfied with that decision the assesses has brought ... | 0 | train | 1971_378.txt |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.