Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -14,6 +14,26 @@ A11YBench consists of 60 real-world web projects, encompassing 147 web pages and
|
|
| 14 |
The projects vary substantially in size, from 123 to 43,198 source files and from 3,610 to 1,555,532 lines of code, covering both lightweight documentation sites and large production-grade applications.
|
| 15 |
This scale ensures that A11YBench reflects the structural and technical diversity of modern web ecosystems.
|
| 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
## 🚀Dataset Features
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
### Dataset Split
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
The projects vary substantially in size, from 123 to 43,198 source files and from 3,610 to 1,555,532 lines of code, covering both lightweight documentation sites and large production-grade applications.
|
| 15 |
This scale ensures that A11YBench reflects the structural and technical diversity of modern web ecosystems.
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
+
## 🔍Dataset Collection
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
We consider real, actively maintained GitHub repositories implementing production websites using JavaScript or TypeScript, including frameworks such as React, Next.js, Vue, and static site generators.
|
| 20 |
+
Using GitHub's search with keyword `website` and language filters `JavaScript`, `TypeScript`, we sort by `Best Match` and collect the top 500 repositories for screening.
|
| 21 |
+
We select repositories showing active maintenance by keeping those with over 100 total pull requests, 10 stars, and at least one commit within the past month.
|
| 22 |
+
After manual verification of setup documentation and reproducibility.
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
To ensure reproducibility, we keep only projects that can be successfully built and executed in a local environment.
|
| 25 |
+
Following prior benchmark practices (e.g., [SWE-bench](https://huggingface.co/datasets/SWE-bench/SWE-bench_Multimodal), we manually follow installation guides, resolve dependencies, and verify successful local deployment.
|
| 26 |
+
Projects lacking clear setup instructions or exhibiting build or runtime errors are discarded.
|
| 27 |
+
For each successfully deployed project, we manually inspect the homepage and linked subpages to ensure correct rendering and navigation.
|
| 28 |
+
Here, we randomly pick 60 deployable and visually functional web projects as our test set.
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
Next, we identify reproducible test instances suitable for accessibility evaluation.
|
| 31 |
+
For each project, we select the homepage and several randomly sampled subpages (linked from the homepage),
|
| 32 |
+
and manually remove any inappropriate pages (such as plain text elements, project documentation, etc).
|
| 33 |
+
Following [prior studies](https://github.com/seal-hub/GenA11y) that highlight the IBM Accessibility Checker as one of the most reliable open-source web accessibility checker tools, we use it to detect accessibility violations and verify consistent results across multiple runs.
|
| 34 |
+
Pages that trigger checker errors or yield inconsistent outputs are excluded.
|
| 35 |
+
After filtering, 60 projects with 145 stable and reproducible test pages remain for accessibility repair evaluation.
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
## 🚀Dataset Features
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
### Dataset Split
|