Datasets:

Modalities:
Text
Formats:
csv
Size:
< 1K
Libraries:
Datasets
pandas
License:
natalievgrafova commited on
Commit
33f96ef
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 07f2c6d

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +86 -3
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,86 @@
1
- ---
2
- license: mit
3
- ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: mit
3
+ ---
4
+ ## Dataset of plausibility and stance annotations of the generated definitions
5
+
6
+ The dataset can be used for studies in the plausibility and stance evaluation of the generated output.
7
+
8
+ This dataset contains only arguments and definitions on the topic of *abortion*.
9
+ The dataset contains an original argument, the stance of the original argument, the generated definition from an extracted argumentative sequence that contains the keyword,
10
+ the model used for generation, the topic (keyword), and annotations for stance and plausibility by two annotators.
11
+
12
+ The dataset contains original arguments from Webis args.me cor-
13
+ pus (Ajjour et al., 2019b) and IBM Keypoint Dataset (Friedman et al., 2021). The definitions were generated by one of the following models:
14
+
15
+ | Model | Training data |
16
+ |-------------------|--------------------------|
17
+ | LT3/definitions-oxford-llama-8B-instruct | Oxford |
18
+ | LT3/definitions-all-noslang-llama-8B-instruct | WordNet, Wiki, Oxford |
19
+ | LT3/definitions-all-llama-8B-instruct | WordNet, Wiki, Oxford, Urban |
20
+ | LT3/definitions-wordnet-llama-8B-instruct |WordNet |
21
+ | LT3/definitions-slang-llama-8B-instruct | Urban |
22
+
23
+
24
+
25
+ ## How to use
26
+
27
+ Use this code to extract the argumentative sequence from the original arguments that was used to generate definitions:
28
+
29
+ ```python
30
+ def extract_keyword_sentence(text, keyword, max_length=256):
31
+ """Extract and truncate the sentence containing the keyword."""
32
+ if pd.isna(text) or pd.isna(keyword):
33
+ return None
34
+ keyword_index = text.lower().find(keyword.lower())
35
+ if keyword_index == -1:
36
+ return None # Keyword not found
37
+ half_length = max_length // 2
38
+ start_index = max(0, keyword_index - half_length)
39
+ end_index = min(len(text), keyword_index + half_length)
40
+ return text[start_index:end_index]
41
+
42
+ def add_example_column(df, argument_col="argument", topic_col="topic", max_length=256):
43
+ """
44
+ Create an 'example' column by extracting the snippet from the argument text
45
+ that contains the topic keyword.
46
+ """
47
+ df = df.copy()
48
+ df["example"] = df.apply(
49
+ lambda row: extract_keyword_sentence(str(row[argument_col]), str(row[topic_col]), max_length),
50
+ axis=1
51
+ )
52
+ return df
53
+
54
+
55
+ ```
56
+
57
+
58
+ ### BibTeX entry and citation info
59
+
60
+ If you would like to use or cite this dataset, feel free to use the following BibTeX code:
61
+
62
+ ```bibtex
63
+ @inproceedings{evgrafova-etal-2025-stance,
64
+ title = "Stance-aware Definition Generation for Argumentative Texts",
65
+ author = "Evgrafova, Natalia and
66
+ De Langhe, Loic
67
+ and
68
+ Hoste, Veronique and
69
+ Lefever, Els ",
70
+ editor = "Chistova, Elena and
71
+ Cimiano, Philipp and
72
+ Haddadan, Shohreh and
73
+ Lapesa, Gabriella and
74
+ Ruiz-Dolz, Ramon",
75
+ booktitle = "Proceedings of the 12th Argument mining Workshop",
76
+ month = jul,
77
+ year = "2025",
78
+ address = "Vienna, Austria",
79
+ publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
80
+ url = "https://aclanthology.org/2025.argmining-1.16/",
81
+ doi = "10.18653/v1/2025.argmining-1.16",
82
+ pages = "168--180",
83
+ ISBN = "979-8-89176-258-9",
84
+ abstract = "Definition generation models trained on dictionary data are generally expected to produce neutral and unbiased output while capturing the contextual nuances. However, previous studies have shown that generated definitions can inherit biases from both the underlying models and the input context. This paper examines the extent to which stance-related bias in argumentative data influences the generated definitions. In particular, we train a model on a slang-based dictionary to explore the feasibility of generating persuasive definitions that concisely reflect opposing parties' understandings of contested terms. Through this study, we provide new insights into bias propagation in definition generation and its implications for definition generation applications and argument mining."
85
+ }
86
+