File size: 2,008 Bytes
e90c557
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
# Humanizer-5M

Version: 2.0.0

Humanizer-5M is a synthetic conversational adaptation dataset.

The central objective is not simply to rewrite text to sound casual.

Each example models:

1. what the user explicitly asks,
2. what the user may implicitly need,
3. the user's conversational signals,
4. the appropriate response calibration,
5. the final response,
6. quality and stability metrics.

The dataset specifically teaches proportional adaptation.

High user energy does not automatically mean high hype.
Frustration does not automatically mean excessive empathy.
Casual language does not automatically require slang.
Emojis are used only when contextually appropriate.

The dataset also contains hard negatives representing responses
that are grammatically correct but poorly calibrated.

## Dataset size

Total: 5,000,000

Train: 4,750,000
Validation: 125,000
Test: 125,000

Shard size: 100,000

## Core dimensions

The dataset includes explicit calibration dimensions for:

- energy
- hype
- empathy
- warmth
- formality
- directness
- verbosity
- humor
- emoji usage
- technicality
- confidence
- urgency

## Quality metrics

Examples also contain:

- naturalness
- human_likeness_proxy
- context_fit
- emotional_fit
- hype_fit
- empathy_fit
- emoji_fit
- verbosity_fit
- directness_fit
- formality_fit
- humor_fit
- technicality_fit
- consistency
- emotional_stability
- overreaction_penalty
- forced_human_penalty
- generic_ai_penalty
- repetition_penalty
- emoji_overuse_penalty
- hype_without_reason_penalty
- tone_jump_penalty
- overall_quality

## Hard negatives

The dataset includes deliberately miscalibrated candidate responses.

Examples include:

- unnecessary hype
- forced empathy
- emoji overuse
- excessive verbosity
- generic assistant phrasing
- abrupt tone changes

## Important

Metrics are synthetic training labels and calibration signals.
They are not empirical measurements of whether a response was
written by a human.

The dataset does not contain private conversations.