id stringlengths 16 16 | task_family stringclasses 20
values | task_type stringclasses 20
values | domain stringclasses 14
values | difficulty stringclasses 5
values | difficulty_label stringclasses 5
values | language stringclasses 1
value | instruction stringlengths 54 90 | context stringlengths 0 82 | response stringlengths 1 330 | analysis_plan stringclasses 10
values | verification stringclasses 10
values | verification_type stringclasses 7
values | prompt_review stringclasses 2
values | prompt_alignment stringclasses 3
values | constraint_check stringclasses 3
values | consistency_check stringclasses 2
values | math_check stringclasses 3
values | logic_check stringclasses 3
values | counterexample_check stringclasses 2
values | data_analysis_check stringclasses 3
values | code_check stringclasses 3
values | evidence_check stringclasses 3
values | source_check stringclasses 3
values | hallucination_control stringclasses 10
values | error_detection stringclasses 10
values | error_repair stringclasses 10
values | answerability stringclasses 2
values | confidence float32 0.85 1 | uncertainty float32 0 0.15 | reasoning_depth int16 1 4 | minimal_sufficient_reasoning bool 1
class | unnecessary_reasoning bool 1
class | stop_condition stringclasses 10
values | surface_variation int32 0 16 | numeric_variation int32 0 96 | structure_variation int32 0 30 | ood_style int32 0 12 | quality_score float32 0.9 0.9 | synthetic bool 1
class | license stringclasses 1
value | generator_version stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mtd-000000010600 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10600. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 27 | 29 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010601 | research | research_methodology | biology | easy | easy | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about biology. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 10 | 28 | 30 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010602 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10602. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 29 | 0 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010603 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10603. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 30 | 1 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010604 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10604. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 31 | 2 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010605 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | easy | easy | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 2432836 ÷ 476 | 2432836 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 14 | 32 | 3 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010606 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10606. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 33 | 4 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010607 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10607. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 34 | 5 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010608 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10608. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 35 | 6 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010609 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10609. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010610 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10610. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010611 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10611. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 38 | 9 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010612 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10612. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 39 | 10 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010613 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | medium | medium | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 56, 20, 31, 97, 47 | Mean = 50.2000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 5 | 40 | 11 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010614 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 41 + 99
Proposed answer: 148 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 140. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 6 | 41 | 12 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000010615 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10615. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 42 | 13 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010616 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10616. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 43 | 14 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010617 | research | research_methodology | materials science | medium | medium | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about materials science. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 9 | 44 | 15 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010618 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 2, B = 86 | B is greater than A by 84. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 10 | 45 | 16 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000010619 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10619. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 46 | 17 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010620 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10620. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 47 | 18 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010621 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10621. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 48 | 19 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010622 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | medium | medium | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 64, then x is positive.
x = 64.
y = 48. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 14 | 49 | 20 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010623 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10623. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 50 | 21 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010624 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 56 + 74
Proposed answer: 133 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 130. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 16 | 51 | 22 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000010625 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10625. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 52 | 23 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010626 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10626. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 53 | 24 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010627 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10627. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 54 | 25 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010628 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10628. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 55 | 26 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010629 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | medium | medium | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | The Earth has one natural satellite. | Assessment: Correct.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 4 | 56 | 27 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000010630 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | medium | medium | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | A triangle has four sides. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 5 | 57 | 28 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000010631 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | medium | medium | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | Water freezes at 0°C under standard atmospheric pressure. | Assessment: Correct.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 6 | 58 | 29 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000010632 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10632. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 59 | 30 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010633 | research | research_methodology | materials science | medium | medium | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about materials science. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 8 | 60 | 0 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010634 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10634. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 61 | 1 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010635 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10635. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 62 | 2 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010636 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10636. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 63 | 3 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010637 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10637. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 64 | 4 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010638 | research | research_methodology | statistics | medium | medium | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about statistics. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 13 | 65 | 5 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010639 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10639. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 66 | 6 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010640 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | hard | hard | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 4705 | 9410 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 15 | 67 | 7 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000010641 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10641. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 68 | 8 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010642 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10642. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 69 | 9 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010643 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | hard | hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | The Earth has one natural satellite. | Assessment: Correct.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 1 | 70 | 10 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000010644 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10644. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 71 | 11 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010645 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10645. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 72 | 12 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010646 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10646. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 73 | 13 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010647 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10647. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 74 | 14 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010648 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10648. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 75 | 15 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010649 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | hard | hard | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 960 | 1920 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 7 | 76 | 16 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000010650 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 88 + 73
Proposed answer: 165 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 161. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 8 | 77 | 17 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000010651 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | hard | hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 8, 70, 87, 37, 30 | Mean = 46.4000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 9 | 78 | 18 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010652 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10652. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 79 | 19 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010653 | research | research_methodology | biology | hard | hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about biology. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 11 | 80 | 20 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010654 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10654. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 81 | 21 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010655 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | hard | hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 71, 53, 21, 2, 76 | Mean = 44.6000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 13 | 82 | 22 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010656 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10656. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 83 | 23 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010657 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10657. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 84 | 24 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010658 | research | research_methodology | statistics | hard | hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about statistics. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 16 | 85 | 25 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010659 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | hard | hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 96, 37, 36, 95, 6 | Mean = 54.0000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 0 | 86 | 26 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010660 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10660. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 87 | 27 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010661 | code | function_generation | programming | hard | hard | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 51647 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 2 | 88 | 28 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010662 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10662. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 89 | 29 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010663 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10663. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 90 | 30 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010664 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10664. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 91 | 0 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010665 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 95 + 38
Proposed answer: 140 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 133. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 6 | 92 | 1 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000010666 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | hard | hard | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 7446 | 14892 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 7 | 93 | 2 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000010667 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10667. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 94 | 3 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010668 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | hard | hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | All metals are liquid at room temperature. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 9 | 95 | 4 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000010669 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 23 + 76
Proposed answer: 101 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 99. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 10 | 96 | 5 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000010670 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10670. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010671 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10671. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010672 | code | function_generation | programming | hard | hard | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 21208 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 13 | 2 | 8 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010673 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10673. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010674 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | hard | hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | All metals are liquid at room temperature. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 15 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000010675 | research | research_methodology | astronomy | very_hard | very_hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about astronomy. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 16 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010676 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10676. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 6 | 12 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010677 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 49, 41, 64, 22, 74 | Mean = 50.0000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 1 | 7 | 13 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010678 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10678. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 8 | 14 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010679 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10679. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 9 | 15 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010680 | code | function_generation | programming | very_hard | very_hard | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 12934 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 4 | 10 | 16 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010681 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 484542 + 571705 | 1056247 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 5 | 11 | 17 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010682 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10682. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 12 | 18 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010683 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | very_hard | very_hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 28, then x is positive.
x = 28.
y = 95. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 7 | 13 | 19 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010684 | research | research_methodology | computer security | very_hard | very_hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about computer security. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 8 | 14 | 20 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010685 | code | function_generation | programming | very_hard | very_hard | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 70629 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 9 | 15 | 21 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010686 | research | research_methodology | computer security | very_hard | very_hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about computer security. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 10 | 16 | 22 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010687 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 98, 29, 23, 46, 73 | Mean = 53.8000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 11 | 17 | 23 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010688 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 90, 77, 7, 30, 41 | Mean = 49.0000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 12 | 18 | 24 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010689 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | very_hard | very_hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 61, then x is positive.
x = 61.
y = 84. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 13 | 19 | 25 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010690 | code | function_generation | programming | very_hard | very_hard | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 469 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 14 | 20 | 26 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010691 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 1556423 ÷ 209 | 1556423 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 15 | 21 | 27 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010692 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10692. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 22 | 28 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010693 | research | research_methodology | biology | very_hard | very_hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about biology. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 0 | 23 | 29 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000010694 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10694. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 24 | 30 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010695 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10695. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 25 | 0 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010696 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | extreme | extreme | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 65 + 58
Proposed answer: 131 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 123. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 3 | 26 | 1 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000010697 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10697. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 27 | 2 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010698 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10698. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 28 | 3 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000010699 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 10699. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 29 | 4 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.