| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
|
| | const { logSlashCommand } = vi.hoisted(() => ({ |
| | logSlashCommand: vi.fn(), |
| | })); |
| |
|
| | vi.mock('@google/gemini-cli-core', async (importOriginal) => { |
| | const original = |
| | await importOriginal<typeof import('@google/gemini-cli-core')>(); |
| |
|
| | return { |
| | ...original, |
| | logSlashCommand, |
| | getIdeInstaller: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(null), |
| | }; |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | const { mockProcessExit } = vi.hoisted(() => ({ |
| | mockProcessExit: vi.fn((_code?: number): never => undefined as never), |
| | })); |
| |
|
| | vi.mock('node:process', () => { |
| | const mockProcess: Partial<NodeJS.Process> = { |
| | exit: mockProcessExit, |
| | platform: 'sunos', |
| | cwd: () => '/fake/dir', |
| | } as unknown as NodeJS.Process; |
| | return { |
| | ...mockProcess, |
| | default: mockProcess, |
| | }; |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | const mockBuiltinLoadCommands = vi.fn(); |
| | vi.mock('../../services/BuiltinCommandLoader.js', () => ({ |
| | BuiltinCommandLoader: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({ |
| | loadCommands: mockBuiltinLoadCommands, |
| | })), |
| | })); |
| |
|
| | const mockFileLoadCommands = vi.fn(); |
| | vi.mock('../../services/FileCommandLoader.js', () => ({ |
| | FileCommandLoader: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({ |
| | loadCommands: mockFileLoadCommands, |
| | })), |
| | })); |
| |
|
| | const mockMcpLoadCommands = vi.fn(); |
| | vi.mock('../../services/McpPromptLoader.js', () => ({ |
| | McpPromptLoader: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({ |
| | loadCommands: mockMcpLoadCommands, |
| | })), |
| | })); |
| |
|
| | vi.mock('../contexts/SessionContext.js', () => ({ |
| | useSessionStats: vi.fn(() => ({ stats: {} })), |
| | })); |
| |
|
| | const { mockRunExitCleanup } = vi.hoisted(() => ({ |
| | mockRunExitCleanup: vi.fn(), |
| | })); |
| |
|
| | vi.mock('../../utils/cleanup.js', () => ({ |
| | runExitCleanup: mockRunExitCleanup, |
| | })); |
| |
|
| | import { act, renderHook, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'; |
| | import { vi, describe, it, expect, beforeEach, type Mock } from 'vitest'; |
| | import { useSlashCommandProcessor } from './slashCommandProcessor.js'; |
| | import type { |
| | CommandContext, |
| | ConfirmShellCommandsActionReturn, |
| | SlashCommand, |
| | } from '../commands/types.js'; |
| | import { CommandKind } from '../commands/types.js'; |
| | import type { LoadedSettings } from '../../config/settings.js'; |
| | import { MessageType } from '../types.js'; |
| | import { BuiltinCommandLoader } from '../../services/BuiltinCommandLoader.js'; |
| | import { FileCommandLoader } from '../../services/FileCommandLoader.js'; |
| | import { McpPromptLoader } from '../../services/McpPromptLoader.js'; |
| | import { |
| | SlashCommandStatus, |
| | ToolConfirmationOutcome, |
| | makeFakeConfig, |
| | ToolConfirmationOutcome, |
| | type IdeClient, |
| | } from '@google/gemini-cli-core'; |
| |
|
| | function createTestCommand( |
| | overrides: Partial<SlashCommand>, |
| | kind: CommandKind = CommandKind.BUILT_IN, |
| | ): SlashCommand { |
| | return { |
| | name: 'test', |
| | description: 'a test command', |
| | kind, |
| | ...overrides, |
| | }; |
| | } |
| |
|
| | describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => { |
| | const mockAddItem = vi.fn(); |
| | const mockClearItems = vi.fn(); |
| | const mockLoadHistory = vi.fn(); |
| | const mockOpenThemeDialog = vi.fn(); |
| | const mockOpenAuthDialog = vi.fn(); |
| | const mockSetQuittingMessages = vi.fn(); |
| |
|
| | const mockConfig = makeFakeConfig({}); |
| | vi.spyOn(mockConfig, 'getIdeClient').mockReturnValue({ |
| | addStatusChangeListener: vi.fn(), |
| | removeStatusChangeListener: vi.fn(), |
| | } as unknown as IdeClient); |
| |
|
| | const mockSettings = {} as LoadedSettings; |
| |
|
| | beforeEach(() => { |
| | vi.clearAllMocks(); |
| | (vi.mocked(BuiltinCommandLoader) as Mock).mockClear(); |
| | mockBuiltinLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue([]); |
| | mockFileLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue([]); |
| | mockMcpLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue([]); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | const setupProcessorHook = ( |
| | builtinCommands: SlashCommand[] = [], |
| | fileCommands: SlashCommand[] = [], |
| | mcpCommands: SlashCommand[] = [], |
| | setIsProcessing = vi.fn(), |
| | ) => { |
| | mockBuiltinLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue(Object.freeze(builtinCommands)); |
| | mockFileLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue(Object.freeze(fileCommands)); |
| | mockMcpLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue(Object.freeze(mcpCommands)); |
| |
|
| | const { result } = renderHook(() => |
| | useSlashCommandProcessor( |
| | mockConfig, |
| | mockSettings, |
| | mockAddItem, |
| | mockClearItems, |
| | mockLoadHistory, |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | mockOpenThemeDialog, |
| | mockOpenAuthDialog, |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | mockSetQuittingMessages, |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | setIsProcessing, |
| | ), |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | return result; |
| | }; |
| |
|
| | describe('Initialization and Command Loading', () => { |
| | it('should initialize CommandService with all required loaders', () => { |
| | setupProcessorHook(); |
| | expect(BuiltinCommandLoader).toHaveBeenCalledWith(mockConfig); |
| | expect(FileCommandLoader).toHaveBeenCalledWith(mockConfig); |
| | expect(McpPromptLoader).toHaveBeenCalledWith(mockConfig); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should call loadCommands and populate state after mounting', async () => { |
| | const testCommand = createTestCommand({ name: 'test' }); |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([testCommand]); |
| |
|
| | await waitFor(() => { |
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands[0]?.name).toBe('test'); |
| | expect(mockBuiltinLoadCommands).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| | expect(mockFileLoadCommands).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| | expect(mockMcpLoadCommands).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should provide an immutable array of commands to consumers', async () => { |
| | const testCommand = createTestCommand({ name: 'test' }); |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([testCommand]); |
| |
|
| | await waitFor(() => { |
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | const commands = result.current.slashCommands; |
| |
|
| | expect(() => { |
| | |
| | commands.push(createTestCommand({ name: 'rogue' })); |
| | }).toThrow(TypeError); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should override built-in commands with file-based commands of the same name', async () => { |
| | const builtinAction = vi.fn(); |
| | const fileAction = vi.fn(); |
| |
|
| | const builtinCommand = createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'override', |
| | description: 'builtin', |
| | action: builtinAction, |
| | }); |
| | const fileCommand = createTestCommand( |
| | { name: 'override', description: 'file', action: fileAction }, |
| | CommandKind.FILE, |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([builtinCommand], [fileCommand]); |
| |
|
| | await waitFor(() => { |
| | |
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/override'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | |
| | expect(fileAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| | expect(builtinAction).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
| | }); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | describe('Command Execution Logic', () => { |
| | it('should display an error for an unknown command', async () => { |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook(); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toBeDefined()); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/nonexistent'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | |
| | expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
| | expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith( |
| | { |
| | type: MessageType.ERROR, |
| | text: 'Unknown command: /nonexistent', |
| | }, |
| | expect.any(Number), |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should display help for a parent command invoked without a subcommand', async () => { |
| | const parentCommand: SlashCommand = { |
| | name: 'parent', |
| | description: 'a parent command', |
| | kind: CommandKind.BUILT_IN, |
| | subCommands: [ |
| | { |
| | name: 'child1', |
| | description: 'First child.', |
| | kind: CommandKind.BUILT_IN, |
| | }, |
| | ], |
| | }; |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([parentCommand]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/parent'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
| | expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith( |
| | { |
| | type: MessageType.INFO, |
| | text: expect.stringContaining( |
| | "Command '/parent' requires a subcommand.", |
| | ), |
| | }, |
| | expect.any(Number), |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should correctly find and execute a nested subcommand', async () => { |
| | const childAction = vi.fn(); |
| | const parentCommand: SlashCommand = { |
| | name: 'parent', |
| | description: 'a parent command', |
| | kind: CommandKind.BUILT_IN, |
| | subCommands: [ |
| | { |
| | name: 'child', |
| | description: 'a child command', |
| | kind: CommandKind.BUILT_IN, |
| | action: childAction, |
| | }, |
| | ], |
| | }; |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([parentCommand]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/parent child with args'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(childAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| |
|
| | expect(childAction).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| | expect.objectContaining({ |
| | services: expect.objectContaining({ |
| | config: mockConfig, |
| | }), |
| | ui: expect.objectContaining({ |
| | addItem: mockAddItem, |
| | }), |
| | }), |
| | 'with args', |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('sets isProcessing to false if the the input is not a command', async () => { |
| | const setMockIsProcessing = vi.fn(); |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([], [], [], setMockIsProcessing); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('imnotacommand'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(setMockIsProcessing).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('sets isProcessing to false if the command has an error', async () => { |
| | const setMockIsProcessing = vi.fn(); |
| | const failCommand = createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'fail', |
| | action: vi.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('oh no!')), |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | const result = setupProcessorHook( |
| | [failCommand], |
| | [], |
| | [], |
| | setMockIsProcessing, |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/fail'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(setMockIsProcessing).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, true); |
| | expect(setMockIsProcessing).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, false); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should set isProcessing to true during execution and false afterwards', async () => { |
| | const mockSetIsProcessing = vi.fn(); |
| | const command = createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'long-running', |
| | action: () => new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 50)), |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([command], [], [], mockSetIsProcessing); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | const executionPromise = act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/long-running'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | |
| | expect(mockSetIsProcessing).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, true); |
| | |
| | expect(mockSetIsProcessing).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(false); |
| |
|
| | await executionPromise; |
| |
|
| | |
| | expect(mockSetIsProcessing).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, false); |
| | expect(mockSetIsProcessing).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
| | }); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | describe('Action Result Handling', () => { |
| | it('should handle "dialog: theme" action', async () => { |
| | const command = createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'themecmd', |
| | action: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ type: 'dialog', dialog: 'theme' }), |
| | }); |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/themecmd'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(mockOpenThemeDialog).toHaveBeenCalled(); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should handle "load_history" action', async () => { |
| | const command = createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'load', |
| | action: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ |
| | type: 'load_history', |
| | history: [{ type: MessageType.USER, text: 'old prompt' }], |
| | clientHistory: [{ role: 'user', parts: [{ text: 'old prompt' }] }], |
| | }), |
| | }); |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/load'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(mockClearItems).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| | expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| | { type: 'user', text: 'old prompt' }, |
| | expect.any(Number), |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should strip thoughts when handling "load_history" action', async () => { |
| | const mockSetHistory = vi.fn(); |
| | const mockGeminiClient = { |
| | setHistory: mockSetHistory, |
| | }; |
| | vi.spyOn(mockConfig, 'getGeminiClient').mockReturnValue( |
| | |
| | mockGeminiClient as any, |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | const historyWithThoughts = [ |
| | { |
| | role: 'model', |
| | parts: [{ text: 'response', thoughtSignature: 'CikB...' }], |
| | }, |
| | ]; |
| | const command = createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'loadwiththoughts', |
| | action: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ |
| | type: 'load_history', |
| | history: [{ type: MessageType.MODEL, text: 'response' }], |
| | clientHistory: historyWithThoughts, |
| | }), |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/loadwiththoughts'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(mockSetHistory).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| | expect(mockSetHistory).toHaveBeenCalledWith(historyWithThoughts, { |
| | stripThoughts: true, |
| | }); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | describe('with fake timers', () => { |
| | |
| | |
| | it('should handle a "quit" action', async () => { |
| | const quitAction = vi |
| | .fn() |
| | .mockResolvedValue({ type: 'quit', messages: [] }); |
| | const command = createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'exit', |
| | action: quitAction, |
| | }); |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
| |
|
| | await waitFor(() => |
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1), |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | vi.useFakeTimers(); |
| |
|
| | try { |
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/exit'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await vi.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(200); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(mockSetQuittingMessages).toHaveBeenCalledWith([]); |
| | expect(mockProcessExit).toHaveBeenCalledWith(0); |
| | } finally { |
| | vi.useRealTimers(); |
| | } |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should call runExitCleanup when handling a "quit" action', async () => { |
| | const quitAction = vi |
| | .fn() |
| | .mockResolvedValue({ type: 'quit', messages: [] }); |
| | const command = createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'exit', |
| | action: quitAction, |
| | }); |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
| |
|
| | await waitFor(() => |
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1), |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | vi.useFakeTimers(); |
| |
|
| | try { |
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/exit'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await vi.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(200); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(mockRunExitCleanup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| | } finally { |
| | vi.useRealTimers(); |
| | } |
| | }); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should handle "submit_prompt" action returned from a file-based command', async () => { |
| | const fileCommand = createTestCommand( |
| | { |
| | name: 'filecmd', |
| | description: 'A command from a file', |
| | action: async () => ({ |
| | type: 'submit_prompt', |
| | content: [{ text: 'The actual prompt from the TOML file.' }], |
| | }), |
| | }, |
| | CommandKind.FILE, |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([], [fileCommand]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | let actionResult; |
| | await act(async () => { |
| | actionResult = await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/filecmd'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(actionResult).toEqual({ |
| | type: 'submit_prompt', |
| | content: [{ text: 'The actual prompt from the TOML file.' }], |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| | { type: MessageType.USER, text: '/filecmd' }, |
| | expect.any(Number), |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should handle "submit_prompt" action returned from a mcp-based command', async () => { |
| | const mcpCommand = createTestCommand( |
| | { |
| | name: 'mcpcmd', |
| | description: 'A command from mcp', |
| | action: async () => ({ |
| | type: 'submit_prompt', |
| | content: [{ text: 'The actual prompt from the mcp command.' }], |
| | }), |
| | }, |
| | CommandKind.MCP_PROMPT, |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([], [], [mcpCommand]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | let actionResult; |
| | await act(async () => { |
| | actionResult = await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/mcpcmd'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(actionResult).toEqual({ |
| | type: 'submit_prompt', |
| | content: [{ text: 'The actual prompt from the mcp command.' }], |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| | { type: MessageType.USER, text: '/mcpcmd' }, |
| | expect.any(Number), |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | describe('Shell Command Confirmation Flow', () => { |
| | |
| | const mockCommandAction = vi.fn(); |
| |
|
| | const shellCommand = createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'shellcmd', |
| | action: mockCommandAction, |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | beforeEach(() => { |
| | |
| | mockCommandAction.mockClear(); |
| |
|
| | |
| | mockCommandAction.mockResolvedValue({ |
| | type: 'confirm_shell_commands', |
| | commandsToConfirm: ['rm -rf /'], |
| | originalInvocation: { raw: '/shellcmd' }, |
| | } as ConfirmShellCommandsActionReturn); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should set confirmation request when action returns confirm_shell_commands', async () => { |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([shellCommand]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | |
| | |
| | act(() => { |
| | result.current.handleSlashCommand('/shellcmd'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | |
| | await waitFor(() => { |
| | expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).not.toBeNull(); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest?.commands).toEqual([ |
| | 'rm -rf /', |
| | ]); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should do nothing if user cancels confirmation', async () => { |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([shellCommand]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | act(() => { |
| | result.current.handleSlashCommand('/shellcmd'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | |
| | await waitFor(() => { |
| | expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).not.toBeNull(); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | const onConfirm = result.current.shellConfirmationRequest?.onConfirm; |
| | expect(onConfirm).toBeDefined(); |
| |
|
| | |
| | |
| | mockCommandAction.mockResolvedValue({ |
| | type: 'message', |
| | messageType: 'info', |
| | content: 'This should not be called', |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | onConfirm!(ToolConfirmationOutcome.Cancel, []); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).toBeNull(); |
| | |
| | expect(mockCommandAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should re-run command with one-time allowlist on "Proceed Once"', async () => { |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([shellCommand]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | act(() => { |
| | result.current.handleSlashCommand('/shellcmd'); |
| | }); |
| | await waitFor(() => { |
| | expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).not.toBeNull(); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | const onConfirm = result.current.shellConfirmationRequest?.onConfirm; |
| |
|
| | |
| | |
| | mockCommandAction.mockResolvedValue({ |
| | type: 'message', |
| | messageType: 'info', |
| | content: 'Success!', |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | onConfirm!(ToolConfirmationOutcome.ProceedOnce, ['rm -rf /']); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).toBeNull(); |
| |
|
| | |
| | await waitFor(() => { |
| | expect(mockCommandAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | |
| | const secondCallContext = mockCommandAction.mock |
| | .calls[1][0] as CommandContext; |
| | expect( |
| | secondCallContext.session.sessionShellAllowlist.has('rm -rf /'), |
| | ).toBe(true); |
| |
|
| | |
| | expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| | { type: MessageType.INFO, text: 'Success!' }, |
| | expect.any(Number), |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | |
| | |
| | await act(async () => { |
| | result.current.handleSlashCommand('/no-op'); |
| | }); |
| | const finalContext = result.current.commandContext; |
| | expect(finalContext.session.sessionShellAllowlist.size).toBe(0); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should re-run command and update session allowlist on "Proceed Always"', async () => { |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([shellCommand]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | act(() => { |
| | result.current.handleSlashCommand('/shellcmd'); |
| | }); |
| | await waitFor(() => { |
| | expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).not.toBeNull(); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | const onConfirm = result.current.shellConfirmationRequest?.onConfirm; |
| | mockCommandAction.mockResolvedValue({ |
| | type: 'message', |
| | messageType: 'info', |
| | content: 'Success!', |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | onConfirm!(ToolConfirmationOutcome.ProceedAlways, ['rm -rf /']); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).toBeNull(); |
| | await waitFor(() => { |
| | expect(mockCommandAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| | { type: MessageType.INFO, text: 'Success!' }, |
| | expect.any(Number), |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | |
| | await waitFor(() => { |
| | const finalContext = result.current.commandContext; |
| | expect(finalContext.session.sessionShellAllowlist.has('rm -rf /')).toBe( |
| | true, |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| | }); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | describe('Command Parsing and Matching', () => { |
| | it('should be case-sensitive', async () => { |
| | const command = createTestCommand({ name: 'test' }); |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/Test'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | |
| | expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| | { |
| | type: MessageType.ERROR, |
| | text: 'Unknown command: /Test', |
| | }, |
| | expect.any(Number), |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should correctly match an altName', async () => { |
| | const action = vi.fn(); |
| | const command = createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'main', |
| | altNames: ['alias'], |
| | description: 'a command with an alias', |
| | action, |
| | }); |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/alias'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(action).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| | expect(mockAddItem).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| | expect.objectContaining({ type: MessageType.ERROR }), |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should handle extra whitespace around the command', async () => { |
| | const action = vi.fn(); |
| | const command = createTestCommand({ name: 'test', action }); |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand(' /test with-args '); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(action).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.anything(), 'with-args'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should handle `?` as a command prefix', async () => { |
| | const action = vi.fn(); |
| | const command = createTestCommand({ name: 'help', action }); |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('?help'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(action).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| | }); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | describe('Command Precedence', () => { |
| | it('should override mcp-based commands with file-based commands of the same name', async () => { |
| | const mcpAction = vi.fn(); |
| | const fileAction = vi.fn(); |
| |
|
| | const mcpCommand = createTestCommand( |
| | { |
| | name: 'override', |
| | description: 'mcp', |
| | action: mcpAction, |
| | }, |
| | CommandKind.MCP_PROMPT, |
| | ); |
| | const fileCommand = createTestCommand( |
| | { name: 'override', description: 'file', action: fileAction }, |
| | CommandKind.FILE, |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([], [fileCommand], [mcpCommand]); |
| |
|
| | await waitFor(() => { |
| | |
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/override'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | |
| | expect(fileAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| | expect(mcpAction).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should prioritize a command with a primary name over a command with a matching alias', async () => { |
| | const quitAction = vi.fn(); |
| | const exitAction = vi.fn(); |
| |
|
| | const quitCommand = createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'quit', |
| | altNames: ['exit'], |
| | action: quitAction, |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | const exitCommand = createTestCommand( |
| | { |
| | name: 'exit', |
| | action: exitAction, |
| | }, |
| | CommandKind.FILE, |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | |
| | |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([quitCommand], [exitCommand]); |
| |
|
| | await waitFor(() => { |
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(2); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/exit'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | |
| | expect(exitAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| | |
| | expect(quitAction).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should add an overridden command to the history', async () => { |
| | const quitCommand = createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'quit', |
| | altNames: ['exit'], |
| | action: vi.fn(), |
| | }); |
| | const exitCommand = createTestCommand( |
| | { name: 'exit', action: vi.fn() }, |
| | CommandKind.FILE, |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | const result = setupProcessorHook([quitCommand], [exitCommand]); |
| | await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(2)); |
| |
|
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/exit'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | |
| | expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| | { type: MessageType.USER, text: '/exit' }, |
| | expect.any(Number), |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | describe('Lifecycle', () => { |
| | it('should abort command loading when the hook unmounts', () => { |
| | const abortSpy = vi.spyOn(AbortController.prototype, 'abort'); |
| | const { unmount } = renderHook(() => |
| | useSlashCommandProcessor( |
| | mockConfig, |
| | mockSettings, |
| | mockAddItem, |
| | mockClearItems, |
| | mockLoadHistory, |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | mockOpenAuthDialog, |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | mockSetQuittingMessages, |
| | vi.fn(), |
| |
|
| | vi.fn(), |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(false), |
| | vi.fn(), |
| | ), |
| | ); |
| |
|
| | unmount(); |
| |
|
| | expect(abortSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
| | }); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | describe('Slash Command Logging', () => { |
| | const mockCommandAction = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ type: 'handled' }); |
| | const loggingTestCommands: SlashCommand[] = [ |
| | createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'logtest', |
| | action: vi |
| | .fn() |
| | .mockResolvedValue({ type: 'message', content: 'hello world' }), |
| | }), |
| | createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'logwithsub', |
| | subCommands: [ |
| | createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'sub', |
| | action: mockCommandAction, |
| | }), |
| | ], |
| | }), |
| | createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'fail', |
| | action: vi.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('oh no!')), |
| | }), |
| | createTestCommand({ |
| | name: 'logalias', |
| | altNames: ['la'], |
| | action: mockCommandAction, |
| | }), |
| | ]; |
| |
|
| | beforeEach(() => { |
| | mockCommandAction.mockClear(); |
| | vi.mocked(logSlashCommand).mockClear(); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should log a simple slash command', async () => { |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook(loggingTestCommands); |
| | await waitFor(() => |
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands.length).toBeGreaterThan(0), |
| | ); |
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/logtest'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(logSlashCommand).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| | mockConfig, |
| | expect.objectContaining({ |
| | command: 'logtest', |
| | subcommand: undefined, |
| | status: SlashCommandStatus.SUCCESS, |
| | }), |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('logs nothing for a bogus command', async () => { |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook(loggingTestCommands); |
| | await waitFor(() => |
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands.length).toBeGreaterThan(0), |
| | ); |
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/bogusbogusbogus'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(logSlashCommand).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('logs a failure event for a failed command', async () => { |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook(loggingTestCommands); |
| | await waitFor(() => |
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands.length).toBeGreaterThan(0), |
| | ); |
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/fail'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(logSlashCommand).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| | mockConfig, |
| | expect.objectContaining({ |
| | command: 'fail', |
| | status: 'error', |
| | subcommand: undefined, |
| | }), |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should log a slash command with a subcommand', async () => { |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook(loggingTestCommands); |
| | await waitFor(() => |
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands.length).toBeGreaterThan(0), |
| | ); |
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/logwithsub sub'); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | expect(logSlashCommand).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| | mockConfig, |
| | expect.objectContaining({ |
| | command: 'logwithsub', |
| | subcommand: 'sub', |
| | }), |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should log the command path when an alias is used', async () => { |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook(loggingTestCommands); |
| | await waitFor(() => |
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands.length).toBeGreaterThan(0), |
| | ); |
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/la'); |
| | }); |
| | expect(logSlashCommand).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
| | mockConfig, |
| | expect.objectContaining({ |
| | command: 'logalias', |
| | }), |
| | ); |
| | }); |
| |
|
| | it('should not log for unknown commands', async () => { |
| | const result = setupProcessorHook(loggingTestCommands); |
| | await waitFor(() => |
| | expect(result.current.slashCommands.length).toBeGreaterThan(0), |
| | ); |
| | await act(async () => { |
| | await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/unknown'); |
| | }); |
| | expect(logSlashCommand).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
| | }); |
| | }); |
| | }); |
| |
|