|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const { logSlashCommand } = vi.hoisted(() => ({ |
|
|
logSlashCommand: vi.fn(), |
|
|
})); |
|
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@google/gemini-cli-core', async (importOriginal) => { |
|
|
const original = |
|
|
await importOriginal<typeof import('@google/gemini-cli-core')>(); |
|
|
|
|
|
return { |
|
|
...original, |
|
|
logSlashCommand, |
|
|
getIdeInstaller: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(null), |
|
|
}; |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
const { mockProcessExit } = vi.hoisted(() => ({ |
|
|
mockProcessExit: vi.fn((_code?: number): never => undefined as never), |
|
|
})); |
|
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('node:process', () => { |
|
|
const mockProcess: Partial<NodeJS.Process> = { |
|
|
exit: mockProcessExit, |
|
|
platform: 'sunos', |
|
|
cwd: () => '/fake/dir', |
|
|
} as unknown as NodeJS.Process; |
|
|
return { |
|
|
...mockProcess, |
|
|
default: mockProcess, |
|
|
}; |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
const mockBuiltinLoadCommands = vi.fn(); |
|
|
vi.mock('../../services/BuiltinCommandLoader.js', () => ({ |
|
|
BuiltinCommandLoader: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({ |
|
|
loadCommands: mockBuiltinLoadCommands, |
|
|
})), |
|
|
})); |
|
|
|
|
|
const mockFileLoadCommands = vi.fn(); |
|
|
vi.mock('../../services/FileCommandLoader.js', () => ({ |
|
|
FileCommandLoader: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({ |
|
|
loadCommands: mockFileLoadCommands, |
|
|
})), |
|
|
})); |
|
|
|
|
|
const mockMcpLoadCommands = vi.fn(); |
|
|
vi.mock('../../services/McpPromptLoader.js', () => ({ |
|
|
McpPromptLoader: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({ |
|
|
loadCommands: mockMcpLoadCommands, |
|
|
})), |
|
|
})); |
|
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('../contexts/SessionContext.js', () => ({ |
|
|
useSessionStats: vi.fn(() => ({ stats: {} })), |
|
|
})); |
|
|
|
|
|
const { mockRunExitCleanup } = vi.hoisted(() => ({ |
|
|
mockRunExitCleanup: vi.fn(), |
|
|
})); |
|
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('../../utils/cleanup.js', () => ({ |
|
|
runExitCleanup: mockRunExitCleanup, |
|
|
})); |
|
|
|
|
|
import { act, renderHook, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'; |
|
|
import { vi, describe, it, expect, beforeEach, type Mock } from 'vitest'; |
|
|
import { useSlashCommandProcessor } from './slashCommandProcessor.js'; |
|
|
import type { |
|
|
CommandContext, |
|
|
ConfirmShellCommandsActionReturn, |
|
|
SlashCommand, |
|
|
} from '../commands/types.js'; |
|
|
import { CommandKind } from '../commands/types.js'; |
|
|
import type { LoadedSettings } from '../../config/settings.js'; |
|
|
import { MessageType } from '../types.js'; |
|
|
import { BuiltinCommandLoader } from '../../services/BuiltinCommandLoader.js'; |
|
|
import { FileCommandLoader } from '../../services/FileCommandLoader.js'; |
|
|
import { McpPromptLoader } from '../../services/McpPromptLoader.js'; |
|
|
import { |
|
|
SlashCommandStatus, |
|
|
ToolConfirmationOutcome, |
|
|
makeFakeConfig, |
|
|
ToolConfirmationOutcome, |
|
|
type IdeClient, |
|
|
} from '@google/gemini-cli-core'; |
|
|
|
|
|
function createTestCommand( |
|
|
overrides: Partial<SlashCommand>, |
|
|
kind: CommandKind = CommandKind.BUILT_IN, |
|
|
): SlashCommand { |
|
|
return { |
|
|
name: 'test', |
|
|
description: 'a test command', |
|
|
kind, |
|
|
...overrides, |
|
|
}; |
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => { |
|
|
const mockAddItem = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const mockClearItems = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const mockLoadHistory = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const mockOpenThemeDialog = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const mockOpenAuthDialog = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const mockSetQuittingMessages = vi.fn(); |
|
|
|
|
|
const mockConfig = makeFakeConfig({}); |
|
|
vi.spyOn(mockConfig, 'getIdeClient').mockReturnValue({ |
|
|
addStatusChangeListener: vi.fn(), |
|
|
removeStatusChangeListener: vi.fn(), |
|
|
} as unknown as IdeClient); |
|
|
|
|
|
const mockSettings = {} as LoadedSettings; |
|
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => { |
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks(); |
|
|
(vi.mocked(BuiltinCommandLoader) as Mock).mockClear(); |
|
|
mockBuiltinLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue([]); |
|
|
mockFileLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue([]); |
|
|
mockMcpLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue([]); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
const setupProcessorHook = ( |
|
|
builtinCommands: SlashCommand[] = [], |
|
|
fileCommands: SlashCommand[] = [], |
|
|
mcpCommands: SlashCommand[] = [], |
|
|
setIsProcessing = vi.fn(), |
|
|
) => { |
|
|
mockBuiltinLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue(Object.freeze(builtinCommands)); |
|
|
mockFileLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue(Object.freeze(fileCommands)); |
|
|
mockMcpLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue(Object.freeze(mcpCommands)); |
|
|
|
|
|
const { result } = renderHook(() => |
|
|
useSlashCommandProcessor( |
|
|
mockConfig, |
|
|
mockSettings, |
|
|
mockAddItem, |
|
|
mockClearItems, |
|
|
mockLoadHistory, |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
mockOpenThemeDialog, |
|
|
mockOpenAuthDialog, |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
mockSetQuittingMessages, |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
setIsProcessing, |
|
|
), |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
return result; |
|
|
}; |
|
|
|
|
|
describe('Initialization and Command Loading', () => { |
|
|
it('should initialize CommandService with all required loaders', () => { |
|
|
setupProcessorHook(); |
|
|
expect(BuiltinCommandLoader).toHaveBeenCalledWith(mockConfig); |
|
|
expect(FileCommandLoader).toHaveBeenCalledWith(mockConfig); |
|
|
expect(McpPromptLoader).toHaveBeenCalledWith(mockConfig); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should call loadCommands and populate state after mounting', async () => { |
|
|
const testCommand = createTestCommand({ name: 'test' }); |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([testCommand]); |
|
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => { |
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands[0]?.name).toBe('test'); |
|
|
expect(mockBuiltinLoadCommands).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
expect(mockFileLoadCommands).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
expect(mockMcpLoadCommands).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should provide an immutable array of commands to consumers', async () => { |
|
|
const testCommand = createTestCommand({ name: 'test' }); |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([testCommand]); |
|
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => { |
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
const commands = result.current.slashCommands; |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(() => { |
|
|
|
|
|
commands.push(createTestCommand({ name: 'rogue' })); |
|
|
}).toThrow(TypeError); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should override built-in commands with file-based commands of the same name', async () => { |
|
|
const builtinAction = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const fileAction = vi.fn(); |
|
|
|
|
|
const builtinCommand = createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'override', |
|
|
description: 'builtin', |
|
|
action: builtinAction, |
|
|
}); |
|
|
const fileCommand = createTestCommand( |
|
|
{ name: 'override', description: 'file', action: fileAction }, |
|
|
CommandKind.FILE, |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([builtinCommand], [fileCommand]); |
|
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => { |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/override'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(fileAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
expect(builtinAction).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
describe('Command Execution Logic', () => { |
|
|
it('should display an error for an unknown command', async () => { |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook(); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toBeDefined()); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/nonexistent'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
|
|
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith( |
|
|
{ |
|
|
type: MessageType.ERROR, |
|
|
text: 'Unknown command: /nonexistent', |
|
|
}, |
|
|
expect.any(Number), |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should display help for a parent command invoked without a subcommand', async () => { |
|
|
const parentCommand: SlashCommand = { |
|
|
name: 'parent', |
|
|
description: 'a parent command', |
|
|
kind: CommandKind.BUILT_IN, |
|
|
subCommands: [ |
|
|
{ |
|
|
name: 'child1', |
|
|
description: 'First child.', |
|
|
kind: CommandKind.BUILT_IN, |
|
|
}, |
|
|
], |
|
|
}; |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([parentCommand]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/parent'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
|
|
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith( |
|
|
{ |
|
|
type: MessageType.INFO, |
|
|
text: expect.stringContaining( |
|
|
"Command '/parent' requires a subcommand.", |
|
|
), |
|
|
}, |
|
|
expect.any(Number), |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should correctly find and execute a nested subcommand', async () => { |
|
|
const childAction = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const parentCommand: SlashCommand = { |
|
|
name: 'parent', |
|
|
description: 'a parent command', |
|
|
kind: CommandKind.BUILT_IN, |
|
|
subCommands: [ |
|
|
{ |
|
|
name: 'child', |
|
|
description: 'a child command', |
|
|
kind: CommandKind.BUILT_IN, |
|
|
action: childAction, |
|
|
}, |
|
|
], |
|
|
}; |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([parentCommand]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/parent child with args'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(childAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(childAction).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ |
|
|
services: expect.objectContaining({ |
|
|
config: mockConfig, |
|
|
}), |
|
|
ui: expect.objectContaining({ |
|
|
addItem: mockAddItem, |
|
|
}), |
|
|
}), |
|
|
'with args', |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('sets isProcessing to false if the the input is not a command', async () => { |
|
|
const setMockIsProcessing = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([], [], [], setMockIsProcessing); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('imnotacommand'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(setMockIsProcessing).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('sets isProcessing to false if the command has an error', async () => { |
|
|
const setMockIsProcessing = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const failCommand = createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'fail', |
|
|
action: vi.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('oh no!')), |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook( |
|
|
[failCommand], |
|
|
[], |
|
|
[], |
|
|
setMockIsProcessing, |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/fail'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(setMockIsProcessing).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, true); |
|
|
expect(setMockIsProcessing).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, false); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should set isProcessing to true during execution and false afterwards', async () => { |
|
|
const mockSetIsProcessing = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const command = createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'long-running', |
|
|
action: () => new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 50)), |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([command], [], [], mockSetIsProcessing); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
const executionPromise = act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/long-running'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockSetIsProcessing).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, true); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockSetIsProcessing).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(false); |
|
|
|
|
|
await executionPromise; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockSetIsProcessing).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, false); |
|
|
expect(mockSetIsProcessing).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
describe('Action Result Handling', () => { |
|
|
it('should handle "dialog: theme" action', async () => { |
|
|
const command = createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'themecmd', |
|
|
action: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ type: 'dialog', dialog: 'theme' }), |
|
|
}); |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/themecmd'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockOpenThemeDialog).toHaveBeenCalled(); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should handle "load_history" action', async () => { |
|
|
const command = createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'load', |
|
|
action: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ |
|
|
type: 'load_history', |
|
|
history: [{ type: MessageType.USER, text: 'old prompt' }], |
|
|
clientHistory: [{ role: 'user', parts: [{ text: 'old prompt' }] }], |
|
|
}), |
|
|
}); |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/load'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockClearItems).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
|
|
{ type: 'user', text: 'old prompt' }, |
|
|
expect.any(Number), |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should strip thoughts when handling "load_history" action', async () => { |
|
|
const mockSetHistory = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const mockGeminiClient = { |
|
|
setHistory: mockSetHistory, |
|
|
}; |
|
|
vi.spyOn(mockConfig, 'getGeminiClient').mockReturnValue( |
|
|
|
|
|
mockGeminiClient as any, |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
const historyWithThoughts = [ |
|
|
{ |
|
|
role: 'model', |
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'response', thoughtSignature: 'CikB...' }], |
|
|
}, |
|
|
]; |
|
|
const command = createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'loadwiththoughts', |
|
|
action: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ |
|
|
type: 'load_history', |
|
|
history: [{ type: MessageType.MODEL, text: 'response' }], |
|
|
clientHistory: historyWithThoughts, |
|
|
}), |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/loadwiththoughts'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockSetHistory).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
expect(mockSetHistory).toHaveBeenCalledWith(historyWithThoughts, { |
|
|
stripThoughts: true, |
|
|
}); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
describe('with fake timers', () => { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('should handle a "quit" action', async () => { |
|
|
const quitAction = vi |
|
|
.fn() |
|
|
.mockResolvedValue({ type: 'quit', messages: [] }); |
|
|
const command = createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'exit', |
|
|
action: quitAction, |
|
|
}); |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
|
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => |
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1), |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
vi.useFakeTimers(); |
|
|
|
|
|
try { |
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/exit'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await vi.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(200); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockSetQuittingMessages).toHaveBeenCalledWith([]); |
|
|
expect(mockProcessExit).toHaveBeenCalledWith(0); |
|
|
} finally { |
|
|
vi.useRealTimers(); |
|
|
} |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should call runExitCleanup when handling a "quit" action', async () => { |
|
|
const quitAction = vi |
|
|
.fn() |
|
|
.mockResolvedValue({ type: 'quit', messages: [] }); |
|
|
const command = createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'exit', |
|
|
action: quitAction, |
|
|
}); |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
|
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => |
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1), |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
vi.useFakeTimers(); |
|
|
|
|
|
try { |
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/exit'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await vi.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(200); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockRunExitCleanup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
} finally { |
|
|
vi.useRealTimers(); |
|
|
} |
|
|
}); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should handle "submit_prompt" action returned from a file-based command', async () => { |
|
|
const fileCommand = createTestCommand( |
|
|
{ |
|
|
name: 'filecmd', |
|
|
description: 'A command from a file', |
|
|
action: async () => ({ |
|
|
type: 'submit_prompt', |
|
|
content: [{ text: 'The actual prompt from the TOML file.' }], |
|
|
}), |
|
|
}, |
|
|
CommandKind.FILE, |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([], [fileCommand]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
let actionResult; |
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
actionResult = await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/filecmd'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(actionResult).toEqual({ |
|
|
type: 'submit_prompt', |
|
|
content: [{ text: 'The actual prompt from the TOML file.' }], |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
|
|
{ type: MessageType.USER, text: '/filecmd' }, |
|
|
expect.any(Number), |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should handle "submit_prompt" action returned from a mcp-based command', async () => { |
|
|
const mcpCommand = createTestCommand( |
|
|
{ |
|
|
name: 'mcpcmd', |
|
|
description: 'A command from mcp', |
|
|
action: async () => ({ |
|
|
type: 'submit_prompt', |
|
|
content: [{ text: 'The actual prompt from the mcp command.' }], |
|
|
}), |
|
|
}, |
|
|
CommandKind.MCP_PROMPT, |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([], [], [mcpCommand]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
let actionResult; |
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
actionResult = await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/mcpcmd'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(actionResult).toEqual({ |
|
|
type: 'submit_prompt', |
|
|
content: [{ text: 'The actual prompt from the mcp command.' }], |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
|
|
{ type: MessageType.USER, text: '/mcpcmd' }, |
|
|
expect.any(Number), |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
describe('Shell Command Confirmation Flow', () => { |
|
|
|
|
|
const mockCommandAction = vi.fn(); |
|
|
|
|
|
const shellCommand = createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'shellcmd', |
|
|
action: mockCommandAction, |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => { |
|
|
|
|
|
mockCommandAction.mockClear(); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockCommandAction.mockResolvedValue({ |
|
|
type: 'confirm_shell_commands', |
|
|
commandsToConfirm: ['rm -rf /'], |
|
|
originalInvocation: { raw: '/shellcmd' }, |
|
|
} as ConfirmShellCommandsActionReturn); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should set confirmation request when action returns confirm_shell_commands', async () => { |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([shellCommand]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
act(() => { |
|
|
result.current.handleSlashCommand('/shellcmd'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => { |
|
|
expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).not.toBeNull(); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest?.commands).toEqual([ |
|
|
'rm -rf /', |
|
|
]); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should do nothing if user cancels confirmation', async () => { |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([shellCommand]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
act(() => { |
|
|
result.current.handleSlashCommand('/shellcmd'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => { |
|
|
expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).not.toBeNull(); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
const onConfirm = result.current.shellConfirmationRequest?.onConfirm; |
|
|
expect(onConfirm).toBeDefined(); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockCommandAction.mockResolvedValue({ |
|
|
type: 'message', |
|
|
messageType: 'info', |
|
|
content: 'This should not be called', |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
onConfirm!(ToolConfirmationOutcome.Cancel, []); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).toBeNull(); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockCommandAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should re-run command with one-time allowlist on "Proceed Once"', async () => { |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([shellCommand]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
act(() => { |
|
|
result.current.handleSlashCommand('/shellcmd'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => { |
|
|
expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).not.toBeNull(); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
const onConfirm = result.current.shellConfirmationRequest?.onConfirm; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockCommandAction.mockResolvedValue({ |
|
|
type: 'message', |
|
|
messageType: 'info', |
|
|
content: 'Success!', |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
onConfirm!(ToolConfirmationOutcome.ProceedOnce, ['rm -rf /']); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).toBeNull(); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => { |
|
|
expect(mockCommandAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const secondCallContext = mockCommandAction.mock |
|
|
.calls[1][0] as CommandContext; |
|
|
expect( |
|
|
secondCallContext.session.sessionShellAllowlist.has('rm -rf /'), |
|
|
).toBe(true); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
|
|
{ type: MessageType.INFO, text: 'Success!' }, |
|
|
expect.any(Number), |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
result.current.handleSlashCommand('/no-op'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
const finalContext = result.current.commandContext; |
|
|
expect(finalContext.session.sessionShellAllowlist.size).toBe(0); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should re-run command and update session allowlist on "Proceed Always"', async () => { |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([shellCommand]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
act(() => { |
|
|
result.current.handleSlashCommand('/shellcmd'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => { |
|
|
expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).not.toBeNull(); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
const onConfirm = result.current.shellConfirmationRequest?.onConfirm; |
|
|
mockCommandAction.mockResolvedValue({ |
|
|
type: 'message', |
|
|
messageType: 'info', |
|
|
content: 'Success!', |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
onConfirm!(ToolConfirmationOutcome.ProceedAlways, ['rm -rf /']); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(result.current.shellConfirmationRequest).toBeNull(); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => { |
|
|
expect(mockCommandAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
|
|
{ type: MessageType.INFO, text: 'Success!' }, |
|
|
expect.any(Number), |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => { |
|
|
const finalContext = result.current.commandContext; |
|
|
expect(finalContext.session.sessionShellAllowlist.has('rm -rf /')).toBe( |
|
|
true, |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
describe('Command Parsing and Matching', () => { |
|
|
it('should be case-sensitive', async () => { |
|
|
const command = createTestCommand({ name: 'test' }); |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
|
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/Test'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
|
|
{ |
|
|
type: MessageType.ERROR, |
|
|
text: 'Unknown command: /Test', |
|
|
}, |
|
|
expect.any(Number), |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should correctly match an altName', async () => { |
|
|
const action = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const command = createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'main', |
|
|
altNames: ['alias'], |
|
|
description: 'a command with an alias', |
|
|
action, |
|
|
}); |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/alias'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(action).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
expect(mockAddItem).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ type: MessageType.ERROR }), |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should handle extra whitespace around the command', async () => { |
|
|
const action = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const command = createTestCommand({ name: 'test', action }); |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand(' /test with-args '); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(action).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.anything(), 'with-args'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should handle `?` as a command prefix', async () => { |
|
|
const action = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const command = createTestCommand({ name: 'help', action }); |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1)); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('?help'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(action).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
describe('Command Precedence', () => { |
|
|
it('should override mcp-based commands with file-based commands of the same name', async () => { |
|
|
const mcpAction = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const fileAction = vi.fn(); |
|
|
|
|
|
const mcpCommand = createTestCommand( |
|
|
{ |
|
|
name: 'override', |
|
|
description: 'mcp', |
|
|
action: mcpAction, |
|
|
}, |
|
|
CommandKind.MCP_PROMPT, |
|
|
); |
|
|
const fileCommand = createTestCommand( |
|
|
{ name: 'override', description: 'file', action: fileAction }, |
|
|
CommandKind.FILE, |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([], [fileCommand], [mcpCommand]); |
|
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => { |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/override'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(fileAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
expect(mcpAction).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should prioritize a command with a primary name over a command with a matching alias', async () => { |
|
|
const quitAction = vi.fn(); |
|
|
const exitAction = vi.fn(); |
|
|
|
|
|
const quitCommand = createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'quit', |
|
|
altNames: ['exit'], |
|
|
action: quitAction, |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
const exitCommand = createTestCommand( |
|
|
{ |
|
|
name: 'exit', |
|
|
action: exitAction, |
|
|
}, |
|
|
CommandKind.FILE, |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([quitCommand], [exitCommand]); |
|
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => { |
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(2); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/exit'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(exitAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(quitAction).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should add an overridden command to the history', async () => { |
|
|
const quitCommand = createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'quit', |
|
|
altNames: ['exit'], |
|
|
action: vi.fn(), |
|
|
}); |
|
|
const exitCommand = createTestCommand( |
|
|
{ name: 'exit', action: vi.fn() }, |
|
|
CommandKind.FILE, |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook([quitCommand], [exitCommand]); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(2)); |
|
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/exit'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
|
|
{ type: MessageType.USER, text: '/exit' }, |
|
|
expect.any(Number), |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
describe('Lifecycle', () => { |
|
|
it('should abort command loading when the hook unmounts', () => { |
|
|
const abortSpy = vi.spyOn(AbortController.prototype, 'abort'); |
|
|
const { unmount } = renderHook(() => |
|
|
useSlashCommandProcessor( |
|
|
mockConfig, |
|
|
mockSettings, |
|
|
mockAddItem, |
|
|
mockClearItems, |
|
|
mockLoadHistory, |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
mockOpenAuthDialog, |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
mockSetQuittingMessages, |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
|
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(false), |
|
|
vi.fn(), |
|
|
), |
|
|
); |
|
|
|
|
|
unmount(); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(abortSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
describe('Slash Command Logging', () => { |
|
|
const mockCommandAction = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ type: 'handled' }); |
|
|
const loggingTestCommands: SlashCommand[] = [ |
|
|
createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'logtest', |
|
|
action: vi |
|
|
.fn() |
|
|
.mockResolvedValue({ type: 'message', content: 'hello world' }), |
|
|
}), |
|
|
createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'logwithsub', |
|
|
subCommands: [ |
|
|
createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'sub', |
|
|
action: mockCommandAction, |
|
|
}), |
|
|
], |
|
|
}), |
|
|
createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'fail', |
|
|
action: vi.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('oh no!')), |
|
|
}), |
|
|
createTestCommand({ |
|
|
name: 'logalias', |
|
|
altNames: ['la'], |
|
|
action: mockCommandAction, |
|
|
}), |
|
|
]; |
|
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => { |
|
|
mockCommandAction.mockClear(); |
|
|
vi.mocked(logSlashCommand).mockClear(); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should log a simple slash command', async () => { |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook(loggingTestCommands); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => |
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands.length).toBeGreaterThan(0), |
|
|
); |
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/logtest'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(logSlashCommand).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
|
|
mockConfig, |
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ |
|
|
command: 'logtest', |
|
|
subcommand: undefined, |
|
|
status: SlashCommandStatus.SUCCESS, |
|
|
}), |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('logs nothing for a bogus command', async () => { |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook(loggingTestCommands); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => |
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands.length).toBeGreaterThan(0), |
|
|
); |
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/bogusbogusbogus'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(logSlashCommand).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('logs a failure event for a failed command', async () => { |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook(loggingTestCommands); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => |
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands.length).toBeGreaterThan(0), |
|
|
); |
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/fail'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(logSlashCommand).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
|
|
mockConfig, |
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ |
|
|
command: 'fail', |
|
|
status: 'error', |
|
|
subcommand: undefined, |
|
|
}), |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should log a slash command with a subcommand', async () => { |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook(loggingTestCommands); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => |
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands.length).toBeGreaterThan(0), |
|
|
); |
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/logwithsub sub'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
expect(logSlashCommand).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
|
|
mockConfig, |
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ |
|
|
command: 'logwithsub', |
|
|
subcommand: 'sub', |
|
|
}), |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should log the command path when an alias is used', async () => { |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook(loggingTestCommands); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => |
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands.length).toBeGreaterThan(0), |
|
|
); |
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/la'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
expect(logSlashCommand).toHaveBeenCalledWith( |
|
|
mockConfig, |
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ |
|
|
command: 'logalias', |
|
|
}), |
|
|
); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
|
|
it('should not log for unknown commands', async () => { |
|
|
const result = setupProcessorHook(loggingTestCommands); |
|
|
await waitFor(() => |
|
|
expect(result.current.slashCommands.length).toBeGreaterThan(0), |
|
|
); |
|
|
await act(async () => { |
|
|
await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/unknown'); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
expect(logSlashCommand).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
}); |
|
|
|