Add files using upload-large-folder tool

.gitattributes

@@ -3506,3 +3506,4 @@ platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/mkdocs/themes/readthedoc
 platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/mkdocs/themes/readthedocs/css/fonts/lato-normal-italic.woff2 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/mkdocs/themes/readthedocs/css/fonts/lato-normal.woff filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/mkdocs/themes/readthedocs/css/fonts/lato-normal.woff2 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/__pycache__/test_validators.cpython-312.pyc filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema-4.20.0.dist-info/licenses/COPYING

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Copyright (c) 2013 Julian Berman
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
+all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
+THE SOFTWARE.

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/benchmarks/__init__.py

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+"""
+Benchmarks for validation.
+
+This package is *not* public API.
+"""

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/benchmarks/issue232.py

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+"""
+A performance benchmark using the example from issue #232.
+
+See https://github.com/python-jsonschema/jsonschema/pull/232.
+"""
+from pathlib import Path
+
+from pyperf import Runner
+from referencing import Registry
+
+from jsonschema.tests._suite import Version
+import jsonschema
+
+issue232 = Version(
+    path=Path(__file__).parent / "issue232",
+    remotes=Registry(),
+    name="issue232",
+)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    issue232.benchmark(
+        runner=Runner(),
+        Validator=jsonschema.Draft4Validator,
+    )

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/benchmarks/json_schema_test_suite.py

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+"""
+A performance benchmark using the official test suite.
+
+This benchmarks jsonschema using every valid example in the
+JSON-Schema-Test-Suite. It will take some time to complete.
+"""
+from pyperf import Runner
+
+from jsonschema.tests._suite import Suite
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    Suite().benchmark(runner=Runner())

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/benchmarks/nested_schemas.py

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+"""
+Validating highly nested schemas shouldn't cause exponential time blowups.
+
+See https://github.com/python-jsonschema/jsonschema/issues/1097.
+"""
+from itertools import cycle
+
+from jsonschema.validators import validator_for
+
+metaschemaish = {
+    "$id": "https://example.com/draft/2020-12/schema/strict",
+    "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
+
+    "$vocabulary": {
+        "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/vocab/core": True,
+        "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/vocab/applicator": True,
+        "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/vocab/unevaluated": True,
+        "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/vocab/validation": True,
+        "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/vocab/meta-data": True,
+        "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/vocab/format-annotation": True,
+        "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/vocab/content": True
+    },
+    "$dynamicAnchor": "meta",
+
+    "$ref": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
+    "unevaluatedProperties": False,
+}
+
+
+def nested_schema(levels):
+    """
+    Produce a schema which validates deeply nested objects and arrays.
+    """
+
+    names = cycle(["foo", "bar", "baz", "quux", "spam", "eggs"])
+    schema = {"type": "object", "properties": {"ham": {"type": "string"}}}
+    for _, name in zip(range(levels - 1), names):
+        schema = {"type": "object", "properties": {name: schema}}
+    return schema
+
+
+validator = validator_for(metaschemaish)(metaschemaish)
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    from pyperf import Runner
+    runner = Runner()
+
+    not_nested = nested_schema(levels=1)
+    runner.bench_func("not nested", lambda: validator.is_valid(not_nested))
+
+    for levels in range(1, 11, 3):
+        schema = nested_schema(levels=levels)
+        runner.bench_func(
+            f"nested * {levels}",
+            lambda schema=schema: validator.is_valid(schema),
+        )

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/benchmarks/subcomponents.py

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+"""
+A benchmark which tries to compare the possible slow subparts of validation.
+"""
+from referencing import Registry
+from referencing.jsonschema import DRAFT202012
+from rpds import HashTrieMap, HashTrieSet
+
+from jsonschema import Draft202012Validator
+
+schema = {
+    "type": "array",
+    "minLength": 1,
+    "maxLength": 1,
+    "items": {"type": "integer"}
+}
+
+hmap = HashTrieMap()
+hset = HashTrieSet()
+
+registry = Registry()
+
+v = Draft202012Validator(schema)
+
+
+def registry_data_structures():
+    return hmap.insert("foo", "bar"), hset.insert("foo")
+
+
+def registry_add():
+    resource = DRAFT202012.create_resource(schema)
+    return registry.with_resource(uri="urn:example", resource=resource)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    from pyperf import Runner
+    runner = Runner()
+
+    runner.bench_func("HashMap/HashSet insertion", registry_data_structures)
+    runner.bench_func("Registry insertion", registry_add)
+    runner.bench_func("Success", lambda: v.is_valid([1]))
+    runner.bench_func("Failure", lambda: v.is_valid(["foo"]))
+    runner.bench_func("Metaschema validation", lambda: v.check_schema(schema))

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/benchmarks/unused_registry.py

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+"""
+An unused schema registry should not cause slower validation.
+
+"Unused" here means one where no reference resolution is occurring anyhow.
+
+See https://github.com/python-jsonschema/jsonschema/issues/1088.
+"""
+from pyperf import Runner
+from referencing import Registry
+from referencing.jsonschema import DRAFT201909
+
+from jsonschema import Draft201909Validator
+
+registry = Registry().with_resource(
+    "urn:example:foo",
+    DRAFT201909.create_resource({})
+)
+
+schema = {"$ref": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/schema"}
+instance = {"maxLength": 4}
+
+no_registry = Draft201909Validator(schema)
+with_useless_registry = Draft201909Validator(schema, registry=registry)
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    runner = Runner()
+
+    runner.bench_func(
+        "no registry",
+        lambda: no_registry.is_valid(instance),
+    )
+    runner.bench_func(
+        "useless registry",
+        lambda: with_useless_registry.is_valid(instance),
+    )

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/benchmarks/validator_creation.py

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+from pyperf import Runner
+
+from jsonschema import Draft202012Validator
+
+schema = {
+    "type": "array",
+    "minLength": 1,
+    "maxLength": 1,
+    "items": {"type": "integer"},
+}
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    Runner().bench_func("validator creation", Draft202012Validator, schema)

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/__pycache__/test_validators.cpython-312.pyc

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b4a0019b4c77e427afbc2c831e35a7860ae7cc1b29d70bdfe369a44a2f8ca706
+size 130088

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/_suite.py

@@ -0,0 +1,274 @@
+"""
+Python representations of the JSON Schema Test Suite tests.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from collections.abc import Iterable, Mapping
+from contextlib import suppress
+from functools import partial
+from pathlib import Path
+from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any
+import json
+import os
+import re
+import subprocess
+import sys
+import unittest
+
+from attrs import field, frozen
+from referencing import Registry
+import referencing.jsonschema
+
+if TYPE_CHECKING:
+    import pyperf
+
+from jsonschema.validators import _VALIDATORS
+import jsonschema
+
+_DELIMITERS = re.compile(r"[\W\- ]+")
+
+
+def _find_suite():
+    root = os.environ.get("JSON_SCHEMA_TEST_SUITE")
+    if root is not None:
+        return Path(root)
+
+    root = Path(jsonschema.__file__).parent.parent / "json"
+    if not root.is_dir():  # pragma: no cover
+        raise ValueError(
+            (
+                "Can't find the JSON-Schema-Test-Suite directory. "
+                "Set the 'JSON_SCHEMA_TEST_SUITE' environment "
+                "variable or run the tests from alongside a checkout "
+                "of the suite."
+            ),
+        )
+    return root
+
+
+@frozen
+class Suite:
+
+    _root: Path = field(factory=_find_suite)
+    _remotes: referencing.jsonschema.SchemaRegistry = field(init=False)
+
+    def __attrs_post_init__(self):
+        jsonschema_suite = self._root.joinpath("bin", "jsonschema_suite")
+        argv = [sys.executable, str(jsonschema_suite), "remotes"]
+        remotes = subprocess.check_output(argv).decode("utf-8")
+
+        resources = json.loads(remotes)
+
+        li = "http://localhost:1234/locationIndependentIdentifierPre2019.json"
+        li4 = "http://localhost:1234/locationIndependentIdentifierDraft4.json"
+
+        registry = Registry().with_resources(
+            [
+                (
+                    li,
+                    referencing.jsonschema.DRAFT7.create_resource(
+                        contents=resources.pop(li),
+                    ),
+                ),
+                (
+                    li4,
+                    referencing.jsonschema.DRAFT4.create_resource(
+                        contents=resources.pop(li4),
+                    ),
+                ),
+            ],
+        ).with_contents(
+            resources.items(),
+            default_specification=referencing.jsonschema.DRAFT202012,
+        )
+        object.__setattr__(self, "_remotes", registry)
+
+    def benchmark(self, runner: pyperf.Runner):  # pragma: no cover
+        for name, Validator in _VALIDATORS.items():
+            self.version(name=name).benchmark(
+                runner=runner,
+                Validator=Validator,
+            )
+
+    def version(self, name) -> Version:
+        return Version(
+            name=name,
+            path=self._root / "tests" / name,
+            remotes=self._remotes,
+        )
+
+
+@frozen
+class Version:
+
+    _path: Path
+    _remotes: referencing.jsonschema.SchemaRegistry
+
+    name: str
+
+    def benchmark(self, **kwargs):  # pragma: no cover
+        for case in self.cases():
+            case.benchmark(**kwargs)
+
+    def cases(self) -> Iterable[_Case]:
+        return self._cases_in(paths=self._path.glob("*.json"))
+
+    def format_cases(self) -> Iterable[_Case]:
+        return self._cases_in(paths=self._path.glob("optional/format/*.json"))
+
+    def optional_cases_of(self, name: str) -> Iterable[_Case]:
+        return self._cases_in(paths=[self._path / "optional" / f"{name}.json"])
+
+    def to_unittest_testcase(self, *groups, **kwargs):
+        name = kwargs.pop("name", "Test" + self.name.title().replace("-", ""))
+        methods = {
+            method.__name__: method
+            for method in (
+                test.to_unittest_method(**kwargs)
+                for group in groups
+                for case in group
+                for test in case.tests
+            )
+        }
+        cls = type(name, (unittest.TestCase,), methods)
+
+        # We're doing crazy things, so if they go wrong, like a function
+        # behaving differently on some other interpreter, just make them
+        # not happen.
+        with suppress(Exception):
+            cls.__module__ = _someone_save_us_the_module_of_the_caller()
+
+        return cls
+
+    def _cases_in(self, paths: Iterable[Path]) -> Iterable[_Case]:
+        for path in paths:
+            for case in json.loads(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")):
+                yield _Case.from_dict(
+                    case,
+                    version=self,
+                    subject=path.stem,
+                    remotes=self._remotes,
+                )
+
+
+@frozen
+class _Case:
+
+    version: Version
+
+    subject: str
+    description: str
+    schema: Mapping[str, Any] | bool
+    tests: list[_Test]
+    comment: str | None = None
+
+    @classmethod
+    def from_dict(cls, data, remotes, **kwargs):
+        data.update(kwargs)
+        tests = [
+            _Test(
+                version=data["version"],
+                subject=data["subject"],
+                case_description=data["description"],
+                schema=data["schema"],
+                remotes=remotes,
+                **test,
+            ) for test in data.pop("tests")
+        ]
+        return cls(tests=tests, **data)
+
+    def benchmark(self, runner: pyperf.Runner, **kwargs):  # pragma: no cover
+        for test in self.tests:
+            runner.bench_func(
+                test.fully_qualified_name,
+                partial(test.validate_ignoring_errors, **kwargs),
+            )
+
+
+@frozen(repr=False)
+class _Test:
+
+    version: Version
+
+    subject: str
+    case_description: str
+    description: str
+
+    data: Any
+    schema: Mapping[str, Any] | bool
+
+    valid: bool
+
+    _remotes: referencing.jsonschema.SchemaRegistry
+
+    comment: str | None = None
+
+    def __repr__(self):  # pragma: no cover
+        return f"<Test {self.fully_qualified_name}>"
+
+    @property
+    def fully_qualified_name(self):  # pragma: no cover
+        return " > ".join(
+            [
+                self.version.name,
+                self.subject,
+                self.case_description,
+                self.description,
+            ],
+        )
+
+    def to_unittest_method(self, skip=lambda test: None, **kwargs):
+        if self.valid:
+            def fn(this):
+                self.validate(**kwargs)
+        else:
+            def fn(this):
+                with this.assertRaises(jsonschema.ValidationError):
+                    self.validate(**kwargs)
+
+        fn.__name__ = "_".join(
+            [
+                "test",
+                _DELIMITERS.sub("_", self.subject),
+                _DELIMITERS.sub("_", self.case_description),
+                _DELIMITERS.sub("_", self.description),
+            ],
+        )
+        reason = skip(self)
+        if reason is None or os.environ.get("JSON_SCHEMA_DEBUG", "0") != "0":
+            return fn
+        elif os.environ.get("JSON_SCHEMA_EXPECTED_FAILURES", "0") != "0":  # pragma: no cover  # noqa: E501
+            return unittest.expectedFailure(fn)
+        else:
+            return unittest.skip(reason)(fn)
+
+    def validate(self, Validator, **kwargs):
+        Validator.check_schema(self.schema)
+        validator = Validator(
+            schema=self.schema,
+            registry=self._remotes,
+            **kwargs,
+        )
+        if os.environ.get("JSON_SCHEMA_DEBUG", "0") != "0":  # pragma: no cover
+            breakpoint()
+        validator.validate(instance=self.data)
+
+    def validate_ignoring_errors(self, Validator):  # pragma: no cover
+        with suppress(jsonschema.ValidationError):
+            self.validate(Validator=Validator)
+
+
+def _someone_save_us_the_module_of_the_caller():
+    """
+    The FQON of the module 2nd stack frames up from here.
+
+    This is intended to allow us to dynamically return test case classes that
+    are indistinguishable from being defined in the module that wants them.
+
+    Otherwise, trial will mis-print the FQON, and copy pasting it won't re-run
+    the class that really is running.
+
+    Save us all, this is all so so so so so terrible.
+    """
+
+    return sys._getframe(2).f_globals["__name__"]

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/fuzz_validate.py

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+"""
+Fuzzing setup for OSS-Fuzz.
+
+See https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/jsonschema for the
+other half of the setup here.
+"""
+import sys
+
+from hypothesis import given, strategies
+
+import jsonschema
+
+PRIM = strategies.one_of(
+    strategies.booleans(),
+    strategies.integers(),
+    strategies.floats(allow_nan=False, allow_infinity=False),
+    strategies.text(),
+)
+DICT = strategies.recursive(
+    base=strategies.one_of(
+        strategies.booleans(),
+        strategies.dictionaries(strategies.text(), PRIM),
+    ),
+    extend=lambda inner: strategies.dictionaries(strategies.text(), inner),
+)
+
+
+@given(obj1=DICT, obj2=DICT)
+def test_schemas(obj1, obj2):
+    try:
+        jsonschema.validate(instance=obj1, schema=obj2)
+    except jsonschema.exceptions.ValidationError:
+        pass
+    except jsonschema.exceptions.SchemaError:
+        pass
+
+
+def main():
+    atheris.instrument_all()
+    atheris.Setup(
+        sys.argv,
+        test_schemas.hypothesis.fuzz_one_input,
+        enable_python_coverage=True,
+    )
+    atheris.Fuzz()
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    import atheris
+    main()

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/test_cli.py

@@ -0,0 +1,907 @@
+from contextlib import redirect_stderr, redirect_stdout
+from importlib import metadata
+from io import StringIO
+from json import JSONDecodeError
+from pathlib import Path
+from textwrap import dedent
+from unittest import TestCase
+import json
+import os
+import subprocess
+import sys
+import tempfile
+import warnings
+
+from jsonschema import Draft4Validator, Draft202012Validator
+from jsonschema.exceptions import (
+    SchemaError,
+    ValidationError,
+    _RefResolutionError,
+)
+from jsonschema.validators import _LATEST_VERSION, validate
+
+with warnings.catch_warnings():
+    warnings.simplefilter("ignore")
+    from jsonschema import cli
+
+
+def fake_validator(*errors):
+    errors = list(reversed(errors))
+
+    class FakeValidator:
+        def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
+            pass
+
+        def iter_errors(self, instance):
+            if errors:
+                return errors.pop()
+            return []  # pragma: no cover
+
+        @classmethod
+        def check_schema(self, schema):
+            pass
+
+    return FakeValidator
+
+
+def fake_open(all_contents):
+    def open(path):
+        contents = all_contents.get(path)
+        if contents is None:
+            raise FileNotFoundError(path)
+        return StringIO(contents)
+    return open
+
+
+def _message_for(non_json):
+    try:
+        json.loads(non_json)
+    except JSONDecodeError as error:
+        return str(error)
+    else:  # pragma: no cover
+        raise RuntimeError("Tried and failed to capture a JSON dump error.")
+
+
+class TestCLI(TestCase):
+    def run_cli(
+        self, argv, files=None, stdin=StringIO(), exit_code=0, **override,
+    ):
+        arguments = cli.parse_args(argv)
+        arguments.update(override)
+
+        self.assertFalse(hasattr(cli, "open"))
+        cli.open = fake_open(files or {})
+        try:
+            stdout, stderr = StringIO(), StringIO()
+            actual_exit_code = cli.run(
+                arguments,
+                stdin=stdin,
+                stdout=stdout,
+                stderr=stderr,
+            )
+        finally:
+            del cli.open
+
+        self.assertEqual(
+            actual_exit_code, exit_code, msg=dedent(
+                f"""
+                    Expected an exit code of {exit_code} != {actual_exit_code}.
+
+                    stdout: {stdout.getvalue()}
+
+                    stderr: {stderr.getvalue()}
+                """,
+            ),
+        )
+        return stdout.getvalue(), stderr.getvalue()
+
+    def assertOutputs(self, stdout="", stderr="", **kwargs):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            self.run_cli(**kwargs),
+            (dedent(stdout), dedent(stderr)),
+        )
+
+    def test_invalid_instance(self):
+        error = ValidationError("I am an error!", instance=12)
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(
+                some_schema='{"does not": "matter since it is stubbed"}',
+                some_instance=json.dumps(error.instance),
+            ),
+            validator=fake_validator([error]),
+
+            argv=["-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="12: I am an error!\n",
+        )
+
+    def test_invalid_instance_pretty_output(self):
+        error = ValidationError("I am an error!", instance=12)
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(
+                some_schema='{"does not": "matter since it is stubbed"}',
+                some_instance=json.dumps(error.instance),
+            ),
+            validator=fake_validator([error]),
+
+            argv=["-i", "some_instance", "--output", "pretty", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="""\
+                ===[ValidationError]===(some_instance)===
+
+                I am an error!
+                -----------------------------
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_invalid_instance_explicit_plain_output(self):
+        error = ValidationError("I am an error!", instance=12)
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(
+                some_schema='{"does not": "matter since it is stubbed"}',
+                some_instance=json.dumps(error.instance),
+            ),
+            validator=fake_validator([error]),
+
+            argv=["--output", "plain", "-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="12: I am an error!\n",
+        )
+
+    def test_invalid_instance_multiple_errors(self):
+        instance = 12
+        first = ValidationError("First error", instance=instance)
+        second = ValidationError("Second error", instance=instance)
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(
+                some_schema='{"does not": "matter since it is stubbed"}',
+                some_instance=json.dumps(instance),
+            ),
+            validator=fake_validator([first, second]),
+
+            argv=["-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="""\
+                12: First error
+                12: Second error
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_invalid_instance_multiple_errors_pretty_output(self):
+        instance = 12
+        first = ValidationError("First error", instance=instance)
+        second = ValidationError("Second error", instance=instance)
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(
+                some_schema='{"does not": "matter since it is stubbed"}',
+                some_instance=json.dumps(instance),
+            ),
+            validator=fake_validator([first, second]),
+
+            argv=["-i", "some_instance", "--output", "pretty", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="""\
+                ===[ValidationError]===(some_instance)===
+
+                First error
+                -----------------------------
+                ===[ValidationError]===(some_instance)===
+
+                Second error
+                -----------------------------
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_multiple_invalid_instances(self):
+        first_instance = 12
+        first_errors = [
+            ValidationError("An error", instance=first_instance),
+            ValidationError("Another error", instance=first_instance),
+        ]
+        second_instance = "foo"
+        second_errors = [ValidationError("BOOM", instance=second_instance)]
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(
+                some_schema='{"does not": "matter since it is stubbed"}',
+                some_first_instance=json.dumps(first_instance),
+                some_second_instance=json.dumps(second_instance),
+            ),
+            validator=fake_validator(first_errors, second_errors),
+
+            argv=[
+                "-i", "some_first_instance",
+                "-i", "some_second_instance",
+                "some_schema",
+            ],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="""\
+                12: An error
+                12: Another error
+                foo: BOOM
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_multiple_invalid_instances_pretty_output(self):
+        first_instance = 12
+        first_errors = [
+            ValidationError("An error", instance=first_instance),
+            ValidationError("Another error", instance=first_instance),
+        ]
+        second_instance = "foo"
+        second_errors = [ValidationError("BOOM", instance=second_instance)]
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(
+                some_schema='{"does not": "matter since it is stubbed"}',
+                some_first_instance=json.dumps(first_instance),
+                some_second_instance=json.dumps(second_instance),
+            ),
+            validator=fake_validator(first_errors, second_errors),
+
+            argv=[
+                "--output", "pretty",
+                "-i", "some_first_instance",
+                "-i", "some_second_instance",
+                "some_schema",
+            ],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="""\
+                ===[ValidationError]===(some_first_instance)===
+
+                An error
+                -----------------------------
+                ===[ValidationError]===(some_first_instance)===
+
+                Another error
+                -----------------------------
+                ===[ValidationError]===(some_second_instance)===
+
+                BOOM
+                -----------------------------
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_custom_error_format(self):
+        first_instance = 12
+        first_errors = [
+            ValidationError("An error", instance=first_instance),
+            ValidationError("Another error", instance=first_instance),
+        ]
+        second_instance = "foo"
+        second_errors = [ValidationError("BOOM", instance=second_instance)]
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(
+                some_schema='{"does not": "matter since it is stubbed"}',
+                some_first_instance=json.dumps(first_instance),
+                some_second_instance=json.dumps(second_instance),
+            ),
+            validator=fake_validator(first_errors, second_errors),
+
+            argv=[
+                "--error-format", ":{error.message}._-_.{error.instance}:",
+                "-i", "some_first_instance",
+                "-i", "some_second_instance",
+                "some_schema",
+            ],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr=":An error._-_.12::Another error._-_.12::BOOM._-_.foo:",
+        )
+
+    def test_invalid_schema(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema='{"type": 12}'),
+            argv=["some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="""\
+                12: 12 is not valid under any of the given schemas
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_invalid_schema_pretty_output(self):
+        schema = {"type": 12}
+
+        with self.assertRaises(SchemaError) as e:
+            validate(schema=schema, instance="")
+        error = str(e.exception)
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema=json.dumps(schema)),
+            argv=["--output", "pretty", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr=(
+                "===[SchemaError]===(some_schema)===\n\n"
+                + str(error)
+                + "\n-----------------------------\n"
+            ),
+        )
+
+    def test_invalid_schema_multiple_errors(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema='{"type": 12, "items": 57}'),
+            argv=["some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="""\
+                57: 57 is not of type 'object', 'boolean'
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_invalid_schema_multiple_errors_pretty_output(self):
+        schema = {"type": 12, "items": 57}
+
+        with self.assertRaises(SchemaError) as e:
+            validate(schema=schema, instance="")
+        error = str(e.exception)
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema=json.dumps(schema)),
+            argv=["--output", "pretty", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr=(
+                "===[SchemaError]===(some_schema)===\n\n"
+                + str(error)
+                + "\n-----------------------------\n"
+            ),
+        )
+
+    def test_invalid_schema_with_invalid_instance(self):
+        """
+        "Validating" an instance that's invalid under an invalid schema
+        just shows the schema error.
+        """
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(
+                some_schema='{"type": 12, "minimum": 30}',
+                some_instance="13",
+            ),
+            argv=["-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="""\
+                12: 12 is not valid under any of the given schemas
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_invalid_schema_with_invalid_instance_pretty_output(self):
+        instance, schema = 13, {"type": 12, "minimum": 30}
+
+        with self.assertRaises(SchemaError) as e:
+            validate(schema=schema, instance=instance)
+        error = str(e.exception)
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(
+                some_schema=json.dumps(schema),
+                some_instance=json.dumps(instance),
+            ),
+            argv=["--output", "pretty", "-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr=(
+                "===[SchemaError]===(some_schema)===\n\n"
+                + str(error)
+                + "\n-----------------------------\n"
+            ),
+        )
+
+    def test_invalid_instance_continues_with_the_rest(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(
+                some_schema='{"minimum": 30}',
+                first_instance="not valid JSON!",
+                second_instance="12",
+            ),
+            argv=[
+                "-i", "first_instance",
+                "-i", "second_instance",
+                "some_schema",
+            ],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="""\
+                Failed to parse 'first_instance': {}
+                12: 12 is less than the minimum of 30
+            """.format(_message_for("not valid JSON!")),
+        )
+
+    def test_custom_error_format_applies_to_schema_errors(self):
+        instance, schema = 13, {"type": 12, "minimum": 30}
+
+        with self.assertRaises(SchemaError):
+            validate(schema=schema, instance=instance)
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema=json.dumps(schema)),
+
+            argv=[
+                "--error-format", ":{error.message}._-_.{error.instance}:",
+                "some_schema",
+            ],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr=":12 is not valid under any of the given schemas._-_.12:",
+        )
+
+    def test_instance_is_invalid_JSON(self):
+        instance = "not valid JSON!"
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema="{}", some_instance=instance),
+            argv=["-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr=f"""\
+                Failed to parse 'some_instance': {_message_for(instance)}
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_instance_is_invalid_JSON_pretty_output(self):
+        stdout, stderr = self.run_cli(
+            files=dict(
+                some_schema="{}",
+                some_instance="not valid JSON!",
+            ),
+
+            argv=["--output", "pretty", "-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(stdout)
+        self.assertIn(
+            "(some_instance)===\n\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n",
+            stderr,
+        )
+        self.assertNotIn("some_schema", stderr)
+
+    def test_instance_is_invalid_JSON_on_stdin(self):
+        instance = "not valid JSON!"
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema="{}"),
+            stdin=StringIO(instance),
+
+            argv=["some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr=f"""\
+                Failed to parse <stdin>: {_message_for(instance)}
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_instance_is_invalid_JSON_on_stdin_pretty_output(self):
+        stdout, stderr = self.run_cli(
+            files=dict(some_schema="{}"),
+            stdin=StringIO("not valid JSON!"),
+
+            argv=["--output", "pretty", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(stdout)
+        self.assertIn(
+            "(<stdin>)===\n\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n",
+            stderr,
+        )
+        self.assertNotIn("some_schema", stderr)
+
+    def test_schema_is_invalid_JSON(self):
+        schema = "not valid JSON!"
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema=schema),
+
+            argv=["some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr=f"""\
+                Failed to parse 'some_schema': {_message_for(schema)}
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_schema_is_invalid_JSON_pretty_output(self):
+        stdout, stderr = self.run_cli(
+            files=dict(some_schema="not valid JSON!"),
+
+            argv=["--output", "pretty", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(stdout)
+        self.assertIn(
+            "(some_schema)===\n\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n",
+            stderr,
+        )
+
+    def test_schema_and_instance_are_both_invalid_JSON(self):
+        """
+        Only the schema error is reported, as we abort immediately.
+        """
+        schema, instance = "not valid JSON!", "also not valid JSON!"
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema=schema, some_instance=instance),
+
+            argv=["some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr=f"""\
+                Failed to parse 'some_schema': {_message_for(schema)}
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_schema_and_instance_are_both_invalid_JSON_pretty_output(self):
+        """
+        Only the schema error is reported, as we abort immediately.
+        """
+        stdout, stderr = self.run_cli(
+            files=dict(
+                some_schema="not valid JSON!",
+                some_instance="also not valid JSON!",
+            ),
+
+            argv=["--output", "pretty", "-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(stdout)
+        self.assertIn(
+            "(some_schema)===\n\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n",
+            stderr,
+        )
+        self.assertNotIn("some_instance", stderr)
+
+    def test_instance_does_not_exist(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema="{}"),
+            argv=["-i", "nonexisting_instance", "some_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="""\
+                'nonexisting_instance' does not exist.
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_instance_does_not_exist_pretty_output(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema="{}"),
+            argv=[
+                "--output", "pretty",
+                "-i", "nonexisting_instance",
+                "some_schema",
+            ],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="""\
+                ===[FileNotFoundError]===(nonexisting_instance)===
+
+                'nonexisting_instance' does not exist.
+                -----------------------------
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_schema_does_not_exist(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            argv=["nonexisting_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="'nonexisting_schema' does not exist.\n",
+        )
+
+    def test_schema_does_not_exist_pretty_output(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            argv=["--output", "pretty", "nonexisting_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="""\
+                ===[FileNotFoundError]===(nonexisting_schema)===
+
+                'nonexisting_schema' does not exist.
+                -----------------------------
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_neither_instance_nor_schema_exist(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            argv=["-i", "nonexisting_instance", "nonexisting_schema"],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="'nonexisting_schema' does not exist.\n",
+        )
+
+    def test_neither_instance_nor_schema_exist_pretty_output(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            argv=[
+                "--output", "pretty",
+                "-i", "nonexisting_instance",
+                "nonexisting_schema",
+            ],
+
+            exit_code=1,
+            stderr="""\
+                ===[FileNotFoundError]===(nonexisting_schema)===
+
+                'nonexisting_schema' does not exist.
+                -----------------------------
+            """,
+        )
+
+    def test_successful_validation(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema="{}", some_instance="{}"),
+            argv=["-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+            stdout="",
+            stderr="",
+        )
+
+    def test_successful_validation_pretty_output(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema="{}", some_instance="{}"),
+            argv=["--output", "pretty", "-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+            stdout="===[SUCCESS]===(some_instance)===\n",
+            stderr="",
+        )
+
+    def test_successful_validation_of_stdin(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema="{}"),
+            stdin=StringIO("{}"),
+            argv=["some_schema"],
+            stdout="",
+            stderr="",
+        )
+
+    def test_successful_validation_of_stdin_pretty_output(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema="{}"),
+            stdin=StringIO("{}"),
+            argv=["--output", "pretty", "some_schema"],
+            stdout="===[SUCCESS]===(<stdin>)===\n",
+            stderr="",
+        )
+
+    def test_successful_validation_of_just_the_schema(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema="{}", some_instance="{}"),
+            argv=["-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+            stdout="",
+            stderr="",
+        )
+
+    def test_successful_validation_of_just_the_schema_pretty_output(self):
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema="{}", some_instance="{}"),
+            argv=["--output", "pretty", "-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+            stdout="===[SUCCESS]===(some_instance)===\n",
+            stderr="",
+        )
+
+    def test_successful_validation_via_explicit_base_uri(self):
+        ref_schema_file = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(delete=False)
+        ref_schema_file.close()
+        self.addCleanup(os.remove, ref_schema_file.name)
+
+        ref_path = Path(ref_schema_file.name)
+        ref_path.write_text('{"definitions": {"num": {"type": "integer"}}}')
+
+        schema = f'{{"$ref": "{ref_path.name}#/definitions/num"}}'
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema=schema, some_instance="1"),
+            argv=[
+                "-i", "some_instance",
+                "--base-uri", ref_path.parent.as_uri() + "/",
+                "some_schema",
+            ],
+            stdout="",
+            stderr="",
+        )
+
+    def test_unsuccessful_validation_via_explicit_base_uri(self):
+        ref_schema_file = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(delete=False)
+        ref_schema_file.close()
+        self.addCleanup(os.remove, ref_schema_file.name)
+
+        ref_path = Path(ref_schema_file.name)
+        ref_path.write_text('{"definitions": {"num": {"type": "integer"}}}')
+
+        schema = f'{{"$ref": "{ref_path.name}#/definitions/num"}}'
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema=schema, some_instance='"1"'),
+            argv=[
+                "-i", "some_instance",
+                "--base-uri", ref_path.parent.as_uri() + "/",
+                "some_schema",
+            ],
+            exit_code=1,
+            stdout="",
+            stderr="1: '1' is not of type 'integer'\n",
+        )
+
+    def test_nonexistent_file_with_explicit_base_uri(self):
+        schema = '{"$ref": "someNonexistentFile.json#definitions/num"}'
+        instance = "1"
+
+        with self.assertRaises(_RefResolutionError) as e:
+            self.assertOutputs(
+                files=dict(
+                    some_schema=schema,
+                    some_instance=instance,
+                ),
+                argv=[
+                    "-i", "some_instance",
+                    "--base-uri", Path.cwd().as_uri(),
+                    "some_schema",
+                ],
+            )
+        error = str(e.exception)
+        self.assertIn(f"{os.sep}someNonexistentFile.json'", error)
+
+    def test_invalid_explicit_base_uri(self):
+        schema = '{"$ref": "foo.json#definitions/num"}'
+        instance = "1"
+
+        with self.assertRaises(_RefResolutionError) as e:
+            self.assertOutputs(
+                files=dict(
+                    some_schema=schema,
+                    some_instance=instance,
+                ),
+                argv=[
+                    "-i", "some_instance",
+                    "--base-uri", "not@UR1",
+                    "some_schema",
+                ],
+            )
+        error = str(e.exception)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            error, "unknown url type: 'foo.json'",
+        )
+
+    def test_it_validates_using_the_latest_validator_when_unspecified(self):
+        # There isn't a better way now I can think of to ensure that the
+        # latest version was used, given that the call to validator_for
+        # is hidden inside the CLI, so guard that that's the case, and
+        # this test will have to be updated when versions change until
+        # we can think of a better way to ensure this behavior.
+        self.assertIs(Draft202012Validator, _LATEST_VERSION)
+
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema='{"const": "check"}', some_instance='"a"'),
+            argv=["-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+            exit_code=1,
+            stdout="",
+            stderr="a: 'check' was expected\n",
+        )
+
+    def test_it_validates_using_draft7_when_specified(self):
+        """
+        Specifically, `const` validation applies for Draft 7.
+        """
+        schema = """
+            {
+                "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+                "const": "check"
+            }
+        """
+        instance = '"foo"'
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema=schema, some_instance=instance),
+            argv=["-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+            exit_code=1,
+            stdout="",
+            stderr="foo: 'check' was expected\n",
+        )
+
+    def test_it_validates_using_draft4_when_specified(self):
+        """
+        Specifically, `const` validation *does not* apply for Draft 4.
+        """
+        schema = """
+            {
+                "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-04/schema#",
+                "const": "check"
+            }
+            """
+        instance = '"foo"'
+        self.assertOutputs(
+            files=dict(some_schema=schema, some_instance=instance),
+            argv=["-i", "some_instance", "some_schema"],
+            stdout="",
+            stderr="",
+        )
+
+
+class TestParser(TestCase):
+
+    FakeValidator = fake_validator()
+
+    def test_find_validator_by_fully_qualified_object_name(self):
+        arguments = cli.parse_args(
+            [
+                "--validator",
+                "jsonschema.tests.test_cli.TestParser.FakeValidator",
+                "--instance", "mem://some/instance",
+                "mem://some/schema",
+            ],
+        )
+        self.assertIs(arguments["validator"], self.FakeValidator)
+
+    def test_find_validator_in_jsonschema(self):
+        arguments = cli.parse_args(
+            [
+                "--validator", "Draft4Validator",
+                "--instance", "mem://some/instance",
+                "mem://some/schema",
+            ],
+        )
+        self.assertIs(arguments["validator"], Draft4Validator)
+
+    def cli_output_for(self, *argv):
+        stdout, stderr = StringIO(), StringIO()
+        with redirect_stdout(stdout), redirect_stderr(stderr):
+            with self.assertRaises(SystemExit):
+                cli.parse_args(argv)
+        return stdout.getvalue(), stderr.getvalue()
+
+    def test_unknown_output(self):
+        stdout, stderr = self.cli_output_for(
+            "--output", "foo",
+            "mem://some/schema",
+        )
+        self.assertIn("invalid choice: 'foo'", stderr)
+        self.assertFalse(stdout)
+
+    def test_useless_error_format(self):
+        stdout, stderr = self.cli_output_for(
+            "--output", "pretty",
+            "--error-format", "foo",
+            "mem://some/schema",
+        )
+        self.assertIn(
+            "--error-format can only be used with --output plain",
+            stderr,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(stdout)
+
+
+class TestCLIIntegration(TestCase):
+    def test_license(self):
+        output = subprocess.check_output(
+            [sys.executable, "-m", "pip", "show", "jsonschema"],
+            stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
+        )
+        self.assertIn(b"License: MIT", output)
+
+    def test_version(self):
+        version = subprocess.check_output(
+            [sys.executable, "-W", "ignore", "-m", "jsonschema", "--version"],
+            stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
+        )
+        version = version.decode("utf-8").strip()
+        self.assertEqual(version, metadata.version("jsonschema"))
+
+    def test_no_arguments_shows_usage_notes(self):
+        output = subprocess.check_output(
+            [sys.executable, "-m", "jsonschema"],
+            stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
+        )
+        output_for_help = subprocess.check_output(
+            [sys.executable, "-m", "jsonschema", "--help"],
+            stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(output, output_for_help)

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/test_deprecations.py

@@ -0,0 +1,431 @@
+from contextlib import contextmanager
+from io import BytesIO
+from unittest import TestCase, mock
+import importlib.metadata
+import json
+import subprocess
+import sys
+import urllib.request
+
+import referencing.exceptions
+
+from jsonschema import FormatChecker, exceptions, protocols, validators
+
+
+class TestDeprecations(TestCase):
+    def test_version(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.0.0, __version__ is deprecated in favor of importlib.metadata.
+        """
+
+        message = "Accessing jsonschema.__version__ is deprecated"
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema import __version__
+
+        self.assertEqual(__version__, importlib.metadata.version("jsonschema"))
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_validators_ErrorTree(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.0.0, importing ErrorTree from jsonschema.validators is
+        deprecated in favor of doing so from jsonschema.exceptions.
+        """
+
+        message = "Importing ErrorTree from jsonschema.validators is "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema.validators import ErrorTree
+
+        self.assertEqual(ErrorTree, exceptions.ErrorTree)
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_import_ErrorTree(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.18.0, importing ErrorTree from the package root is
+        deprecated in favor of doing so from jsonschema.exceptions.
+        """
+
+        message = "Importing ErrorTree directly from the jsonschema package "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema import ErrorTree
+
+        self.assertEqual(ErrorTree, exceptions.ErrorTree)
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_ErrorTree_setitem(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.20.0, setting items on an ErrorTree is deprecated.
+        """
+
+        e = exceptions.ValidationError("some error", path=["foo"])
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree()
+        subtree = exceptions.ErrorTree(errors=[e])
+
+        message = "ErrorTree.__setitem__ is "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            tree["foo"] = subtree
+
+        self.assertEqual(tree["foo"], subtree)
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_import_FormatError(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.18.0, importing FormatError from the package root is
+        deprecated in favor of doing so from jsonschema.exceptions.
+        """
+
+        message = "Importing FormatError directly from the jsonschema package "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema import FormatError
+
+        self.assertEqual(FormatError, exceptions.FormatError)
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_import_Validator(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.19.0, importing Validator from the package root is
+        deprecated in favor of doing so from jsonschema.protocols.
+        """
+
+        message = "Importing Validator directly from the jsonschema package "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema import Validator
+
+        self.assertEqual(Validator, protocols.Validator)
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_validators_validators(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.0.0, accessing jsonschema.validators.validators is
+        deprecated.
+        """
+
+        message = "Accessing jsonschema.validators.validators is deprecated"
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            value = validators.validators
+
+        self.assertEqual(value, validators._VALIDATORS)
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_validators_meta_schemas(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.0.0, accessing jsonschema.validators.meta_schemas is
+        deprecated.
+        """
+
+        message = "Accessing jsonschema.validators.meta_schemas is deprecated"
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            value = validators.meta_schemas
+
+        self.assertEqual(value, validators._META_SCHEMAS)
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_RefResolver_in_scope(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.0.0, RefResolver.in_scope is deprecated.
+        """
+
+        resolver = validators._RefResolver.from_schema({})
+        message = "jsonschema.RefResolver.in_scope is deprecated "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            with resolver.in_scope("foo"):
+                pass
+
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_Validator_is_valid_two_arguments(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.0.0, calling is_valid with two arguments (to provide a
+        different schema) is deprecated.
+        """
+
+        validator = validators.Draft7Validator({})
+        message = "Passing a schema to Validator.is_valid is deprecated "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            result = validator.is_valid("foo", {"type": "number"})
+
+        self.assertFalse(result)
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_Validator_iter_errors_two_arguments(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.0.0, calling iter_errors with two arguments (to provide a
+        different schema) is deprecated.
+        """
+
+        validator = validators.Draft7Validator({})
+        message = "Passing a schema to Validator.iter_errors is deprecated "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            error, = validator.iter_errors("foo", {"type": "number"})
+
+        self.assertEqual(error.validator, "type")
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_Validator_resolver(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.18.0, accessing Validator.resolver is deprecated.
+        """
+
+        validator = validators.Draft7Validator({})
+        message = "Accessing Draft7Validator.resolver is "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            self.assertIsInstance(validator.resolver, validators._RefResolver)
+
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_RefResolver(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.18.0, RefResolver is fully deprecated.
+        """
+
+        message = "jsonschema.RefResolver is deprecated"
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema import RefResolver
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema.validators import RefResolver  # noqa: F401, F811
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_RefResolutionError(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.18.0, RefResolutionError is deprecated in favor of directly
+        catching errors from the referencing library.
+        """
+
+        message = "jsonschema.exceptions.RefResolutionError is deprecated"
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema import RefResolutionError
+
+        self.assertEqual(RefResolutionError, exceptions._RefResolutionError)
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema.exceptions import RefResolutionError
+
+        self.assertEqual(RefResolutionError, exceptions._RefResolutionError)
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_catching_Unresolvable_directly(self):
+        """
+        This behavior is the intended behavior (i.e. it's not deprecated), but
+        given we do "tricksy" things in the iterim to wrap exceptions in a
+        multiple inheritance subclass, we need to be extra sure it works and
+        stays working.
+        """
+        validator = validators.Draft202012Validator({"$ref": "urn:nothing"})
+
+        with self.assertRaises(referencing.exceptions.Unresolvable) as e:
+            validator.validate(12)
+
+        expected = referencing.exceptions.Unresolvable(ref="urn:nothing")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            (e.exception, str(e.exception)),
+            (expected, "Unresolvable: urn:nothing")
+        )
+
+    def test_catching_Unresolvable_via_RefResolutionError(self):
+        """
+        Until RefResolutionError is removed, it is still possible to catch
+        exceptions from reference resolution using it, even though they may
+        have been raised by referencing.
+        """
+        with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning):
+            from jsonschema import RefResolutionError
+
+        validator = validators.Draft202012Validator({"$ref": "urn:nothing"})
+
+        with self.assertRaises(referencing.exceptions.Unresolvable) as u:
+            validator.validate(12)
+
+        with self.assertRaises(RefResolutionError) as e:
+            validator.validate(12)
+
+        self.assertEqual(
+            (e.exception, str(e.exception)),
+            (u.exception, "Unresolvable: urn:nothing")
+        )
+
+    def test_WrappedReferencingError_hashability(self):
+        """
+        Ensure the wrapped referencing errors are hashable when possible.
+        """
+        with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning):
+            from jsonschema import RefResolutionError
+
+        validator = validators.Draft202012Validator({"$ref": "urn:nothing"})
+
+        with self.assertRaises(referencing.exceptions.Unresolvable) as u:
+            validator.validate(12)
+
+        with self.assertRaises(RefResolutionError) as e:
+            validator.validate(12)
+
+        self.assertIn(e.exception, {u.exception})
+        self.assertIn(u.exception, {e.exception})
+
+    def test_Validator_subclassing(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.12.0, subclassing a validator class produces an explicit
+        deprecation warning.
+
+        This was never intended to be public API (and some comments over the
+        years in issues said so, but obviously that's not a great way to make
+        sure it's followed).
+
+        A future version will explicitly raise an error.
+        """
+
+        message = "Subclassing validator classes is "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            class Subclass(validators.Draft202012Validator):
+                pass
+
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            class AnotherSubclass(validators.create(meta_schema={})):
+                pass
+
+    def test_FormatChecker_cls_checks(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.14.0, FormatChecker.cls_checks is deprecated without
+        replacement.
+        """
+
+        self.addCleanup(FormatChecker.checkers.pop, "boom", None)
+
+        message = "FormatChecker.cls_checks "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            FormatChecker.cls_checks("boom")
+
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+    def test_draftN_format_checker(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.16.0, accessing jsonschema.draftn_format_checker is deprecated
+        in favor of Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER.
+        """
+
+        message = "Accessing jsonschema.draft202012_format_checker is "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema import draft202012_format_checker
+
+        self.assertIs(
+            draft202012_format_checker,
+            validators.Draft202012Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+        message = "Accessing jsonschema.draft201909_format_checker is "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema import draft201909_format_checker
+
+        self.assertIs(
+            draft201909_format_checker,
+            validators.Draft201909Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+        message = "Accessing jsonschema.draft7_format_checker is "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema import draft7_format_checker
+
+        self.assertIs(
+            draft7_format_checker,
+            validators.Draft7Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+        message = "Accessing jsonschema.draft6_format_checker is "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema import draft6_format_checker
+
+        self.assertIs(
+            draft6_format_checker,
+            validators.Draft6Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+        message = "Accessing jsonschema.draft4_format_checker is "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema import draft4_format_checker
+
+        self.assertIs(
+            draft4_format_checker,
+            validators.Draft4Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+        message = "Accessing jsonschema.draft3_format_checker is "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            from jsonschema import draft3_format_checker
+
+        self.assertIs(
+            draft3_format_checker,
+            validators.Draft3Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, __file__)
+
+        with self.assertRaises(ImportError):
+            from jsonschema import draft1234_format_checker  # noqa
+
+    def test_import_cli(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.17.0, importing jsonschema.cli is deprecated.
+        """
+
+        message = "The jsonschema CLI is deprecated and will be removed "
+        with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message) as w:
+            import jsonschema.cli
+            importlib.reload(jsonschema.cli)
+
+        self.assertEqual(w.filename, importlib.__file__)
+
+    def test_cli(self):
+        """
+        As of v4.17.0, the jsonschema CLI is deprecated.
+        """
+
+        process = subprocess.run(
+            [sys.executable, "-m", "jsonschema"],
+            capture_output=True,
+        )
+        self.assertIn(b"The jsonschema CLI is deprecated ", process.stderr)
+
+    def test_automatic_remote_retrieval(self):
+        """
+        Automatic retrieval of remote references is deprecated as of v4.18.0.
+        """
+        ref = "http://bar#/$defs/baz"
+        schema = {"$defs": {"baz": {"type": "integer"}}}
+
+        if "requests" in sys.modules:  # pragma: no cover
+            self.addCleanup(
+                sys.modules.__setitem__, "requests", sys.modules["requests"],
+            )
+        sys.modules["requests"] = None
+
+        @contextmanager
+        def fake_urlopen(request):
+            self.assertIsInstance(request, urllib.request.Request)
+            self.assertEqual(request.full_url, "http://bar")
+
+            # Ha ha urllib.request.Request "normalizes" header names and
+            # Request.get_header does not also normalize them...
+            (header, value), = request.header_items()
+            self.assertEqual(header.lower(), "user-agent")
+            self.assertEqual(
+                value, "python-jsonschema (deprecated $ref resolution)",
+            )
+            yield BytesIO(json.dumps(schema).encode("utf8"))
+
+        validator = validators.Draft202012Validator({"$ref": ref})
+
+        message = "Automatically retrieving remote references "
+        patch = mock.patch.object(urllib.request, "urlopen", new=fake_urlopen)
+
+        with patch, self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, message):
+            self.assertEqual(
+                (validator.is_valid({}), validator.is_valid(37)),
+                (False, True),
+            )

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/test_exceptions.py

@@ -0,0 +1,617 @@
+from unittest import TestCase
+import textwrap
+
+from jsonschema import exceptions
+from jsonschema.validators import _LATEST_VERSION
+
+
+class TestBestMatch(TestCase):
+    def best_match_of(self, instance, schema):
+        errors = list(_LATEST_VERSION(schema).iter_errors(instance))
+        best = exceptions.best_match(iter(errors))
+        reversed_best = exceptions.best_match(reversed(errors))
+        self.assertEqual(
+            best._contents(),
+            reversed_best._contents(),
+            f"No consistent best match!\nGot: {best}\n\nThen: {reversed_best}",
+        )
+        return best
+
+    def test_shallower_errors_are_better_matches(self):
+        schema = {
+            "properties": {
+                "foo": {
+                    "minProperties": 2,
+                    "properties": {"bar": {"type": "object"}},
+                },
+            },
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance={"foo": {"bar": []}}, schema=schema)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator, "minProperties")
+
+    def test_oneOf_and_anyOf_are_weak_matches(self):
+        """
+        A property you *must* match is probably better than one you have to
+        match a part of.
+        """
+
+        schema = {
+            "minProperties": 2,
+            "anyOf": [{"type": "string"}, {"type": "number"}],
+            "oneOf": [{"type": "string"}, {"type": "number"}],
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance={}, schema=schema)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator, "minProperties")
+
+    def test_if_the_most_relevant_error_is_anyOf_it_is_traversed(self):
+        """
+        If the most relevant error is an anyOf, then we traverse its context
+        and select the otherwise *least* relevant error, since in this case
+        that means the most specific, deep, error inside the instance.
+
+        I.e. since only one of the schemas must match, we look for the most
+        relevant one.
+        """
+
+        schema = {
+            "properties": {
+                "foo": {
+                    "anyOf": [
+                        {"type": "string"},
+                        {"properties": {"bar": {"type": "array"}}},
+                    ],
+                },
+            },
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance={"foo": {"bar": 12}}, schema=schema)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator_value, "array")
+
+    def test_no_anyOf_traversal_for_equally_relevant_errors(self):
+        """
+        We don't traverse into an anyOf (as above) if all of its context errors
+        seem to be equally "wrong" against the instance.
+        """
+
+        schema = {
+            "anyOf": [
+                {"type": "string"},
+                {"type": "integer"},
+                {"type": "object"},
+            ],
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance=[], schema=schema)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator, "anyOf")
+
+    def test_anyOf_traversal_for_single_equally_relevant_error(self):
+        """
+        We *do* traverse anyOf with a single nested error, even though it is
+        vacuously equally relevant to itself.
+        """
+
+        schema = {
+            "anyOf": [
+                {"type": "string"},
+            ],
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance=[], schema=schema)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator, "type")
+
+    def test_if_the_most_relevant_error_is_oneOf_it_is_traversed(self):
+        """
+        If the most relevant error is an oneOf, then we traverse its context
+        and select the otherwise *least* relevant error, since in this case
+        that means the most specific, deep, error inside the instance.
+
+        I.e. since only one of the schemas must match, we look for the most
+        relevant one.
+        """
+
+        schema = {
+            "properties": {
+                "foo": {
+                    "oneOf": [
+                        {"type": "string"},
+                        {"properties": {"bar": {"type": "array"}}},
+                    ],
+                },
+            },
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance={"foo": {"bar": 12}}, schema=schema)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator_value, "array")
+
+    def test_no_oneOf_traversal_for_equally_relevant_errors(self):
+        """
+        We don't traverse into an oneOf (as above) if all of its context errors
+        seem to be equally "wrong" against the instance.
+        """
+
+        schema = {
+            "oneOf": [
+                {"type": "string"},
+                {"type": "integer"},
+                {"type": "object"},
+            ],
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance=[], schema=schema)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator, "oneOf")
+
+    def test_oneOf_traversal_for_single_equally_relevant_error(self):
+        """
+        We *do* traverse oneOf with a single nested error, even though it is
+        vacuously equally relevant to itself.
+        """
+
+        schema = {
+            "oneOf": [
+                {"type": "string"},
+            ],
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance=[], schema=schema)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator, "type")
+
+    def test_if_the_most_relevant_error_is_allOf_it_is_traversed(self):
+        """
+        Now, if the error is allOf, we traverse but select the *most* relevant
+        error from the context, because all schemas here must match anyways.
+        """
+
+        schema = {
+            "properties": {
+                "foo": {
+                    "allOf": [
+                        {"type": "string"},
+                        {"properties": {"bar": {"type": "array"}}},
+                    ],
+                },
+            },
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance={"foo": {"bar": 12}}, schema=schema)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator_value, "string")
+
+    def test_nested_context_for_oneOf(self):
+        """
+        We traverse into nested contexts (a oneOf containing an error in a
+        nested oneOf here).
+        """
+
+        schema = {
+            "properties": {
+                "foo": {
+                    "oneOf": [
+                        {"type": "string"},
+                        {
+                            "oneOf": [
+                                {"type": "string"},
+                                {
+                                    "properties": {
+                                        "bar": {"type": "array"},
+                                    },
+                                },
+                            ],
+                        },
+                    ],
+                },
+            },
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance={"foo": {"bar": 12}}, schema=schema)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator_value, "array")
+
+    def test_it_prioritizes_matching_types(self):
+        schema = {
+            "properties": {
+                "foo": {
+                    "anyOf": [
+                        {"type": "array", "minItems": 2},
+                        {"type": "string", "minLength": 10},
+                    ],
+                },
+            },
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance={"foo": "bar"}, schema=schema)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator, "minLength")
+
+        reordered = {
+            "properties": {
+                "foo": {
+                    "anyOf": [
+                        {"type": "string", "minLength": 10},
+                        {"type": "array", "minItems": 2},
+                    ],
+                },
+            },
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance={"foo": "bar"}, schema=reordered)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator, "minLength")
+
+    def test_it_prioritizes_matching_union_types(self):
+        schema = {
+            "properties": {
+                "foo": {
+                    "anyOf": [
+                        {"type": ["array", "object"], "minItems": 2},
+                        {"type": ["integer", "string"], "minLength": 10},
+                    ],
+                },
+            },
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance={"foo": "bar"}, schema=schema)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator, "minLength")
+
+        reordered = {
+            "properties": {
+                "foo": {
+                    "anyOf": [
+                        {"type": "string", "minLength": 10},
+                        {"type": "array", "minItems": 2},
+                    ],
+                },
+            },
+        }
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance={"foo": "bar"}, schema=reordered)
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator, "minLength")
+
+    def test_boolean_schemas(self):
+        schema = {"properties": {"foo": False}}
+        best = self.best_match_of(instance={"foo": "bar"}, schema=schema)
+        self.assertIsNone(best.validator)
+
+    def test_one_error(self):
+        validator = _LATEST_VERSION({"minProperties": 2})
+        error, = validator.iter_errors({})
+        self.assertEqual(
+            exceptions.best_match(validator.iter_errors({})).validator,
+            "minProperties",
+        )
+
+    def test_no_errors(self):
+        validator = _LATEST_VERSION({})
+        self.assertIsNone(exceptions.best_match(validator.iter_errors({})))
+
+
+class TestByRelevance(TestCase):
+    def test_short_paths_are_better_matches(self):
+        shallow = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh no!", path=["baz"])
+        deep = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh yes!", path=["foo", "bar"])
+        match = max([shallow, deep], key=exceptions.relevance)
+        self.assertIs(match, shallow)
+
+        match = max([deep, shallow], key=exceptions.relevance)
+        self.assertIs(match, shallow)
+
+    def test_global_errors_are_even_better_matches(self):
+        shallow = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh no!", path=[])
+        deep = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh yes!", path=["foo"])
+
+        errors = sorted([shallow, deep], key=exceptions.relevance)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            [list(error.path) for error in errors],
+            [["foo"], []],
+        )
+
+        errors = sorted([deep, shallow], key=exceptions.relevance)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            [list(error.path) for error in errors],
+            [["foo"], []],
+        )
+
+    def test_weak_keywords_are_lower_priority(self):
+        weak = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh no!", path=[], validator="a")
+        normal = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh yes!", path=[], validator="b")
+
+        best_match = exceptions.by_relevance(weak="a")
+
+        match = max([weak, normal], key=best_match)
+        self.assertIs(match, normal)
+
+        match = max([normal, weak], key=best_match)
+        self.assertIs(match, normal)
+
+    def test_strong_keywords_are_higher_priority(self):
+        weak = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh no!", path=[], validator="a")
+        normal = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh yes!", path=[], validator="b")
+        strong = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh fine!", path=[], validator="c")
+
+        best_match = exceptions.by_relevance(weak="a", strong="c")
+
+        match = max([weak, normal, strong], key=best_match)
+        self.assertIs(match, strong)
+
+        match = max([strong, normal, weak], key=best_match)
+        self.assertIs(match, strong)
+
+
+class TestErrorTree(TestCase):
+    def test_it_knows_how_many_total_errors_it_contains(self):
+        # FIXME: #442
+        errors = [
+            exceptions.ValidationError("Something", validator=i)
+            for i in range(8)
+        ]
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree(errors)
+        self.assertEqual(tree.total_errors, 8)
+
+    def test_it_contains_an_item_if_the_item_had_an_error(self):
+        errors = [exceptions.ValidationError("a message", path=["bar"])]
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree(errors)
+        self.assertIn("bar", tree)
+
+    def test_it_does_not_contain_an_item_if_the_item_had_no_error(self):
+        errors = [exceptions.ValidationError("a message", path=["bar"])]
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree(errors)
+        self.assertNotIn("foo", tree)
+
+    def test_keywords_that_failed_appear_in_errors_dict(self):
+        error = exceptions.ValidationError("a message", validator="foo")
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree([error])
+        self.assertEqual(tree.errors, {"foo": error})
+
+    def test_it_creates_a_child_tree_for_each_nested_path(self):
+        errors = [
+            exceptions.ValidationError("a bar message", path=["bar"]),
+            exceptions.ValidationError("a bar -> 0 message", path=["bar", 0]),
+        ]
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree(errors)
+        self.assertIn(0, tree["bar"])
+        self.assertNotIn(1, tree["bar"])
+
+    def test_children_have_their_errors_dicts_built(self):
+        e1, e2 = (
+            exceptions.ValidationError("1", validator="foo", path=["bar", 0]),
+            exceptions.ValidationError("2", validator="quux", path=["bar", 0]),
+        )
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree([e1, e2])
+        self.assertEqual(tree["bar"][0].errors, {"foo": e1, "quux": e2})
+
+    def test_multiple_errors_with_instance(self):
+        e1, e2 = (
+            exceptions.ValidationError(
+                "1",
+                validator="foo",
+                path=["bar", "bar2"],
+                instance="i1"),
+            exceptions.ValidationError(
+                "2",
+                validator="quux",
+                path=["foobar", 2],
+                instance="i2"),
+        )
+        exceptions.ErrorTree([e1, e2])
+
+    def test_it_does_not_contain_subtrees_that_are_not_in_the_instance(self):
+        error = exceptions.ValidationError("123", validator="foo", instance=[])
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree([error])
+
+        with self.assertRaises(IndexError):
+            tree[0]
+
+    def test_if_its_in_the_tree_anyhow_it_does_not_raise_an_error(self):
+        """
+        If a keyword refers to a path that isn't in the instance, the
+        tree still properly returns a subtree for that path.
+        """
+
+        error = exceptions.ValidationError(
+            "a message", validator="foo", instance={}, path=["foo"],
+        )
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree([error])
+        self.assertIsInstance(tree["foo"], exceptions.ErrorTree)
+
+    def test_iter(self):
+        e1, e2 = (
+            exceptions.ValidationError(
+                "1",
+                validator="foo",
+                path=["bar", "bar2"],
+                instance="i1"),
+            exceptions.ValidationError(
+                "2",
+                validator="quux",
+                path=["foobar", 2],
+                instance="i2"),
+        )
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree([e1, e2])
+        self.assertEqual(set(tree), {"bar", "foobar"})
+
+    def test_repr_single(self):
+        error = exceptions.ValidationError(
+            "1",
+            validator="foo",
+            path=["bar", "bar2"],
+            instance="i1",
+        )
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree([error])
+        self.assertEqual(repr(tree), "<ErrorTree (1 total error)>")
+
+    def test_repr_multiple(self):
+        e1, e2 = (
+            exceptions.ValidationError(
+                "1",
+                validator="foo",
+                path=["bar", "bar2"],
+                instance="i1"),
+            exceptions.ValidationError(
+                "2",
+                validator="quux",
+                path=["foobar", 2],
+                instance="i2"),
+        )
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree([e1, e2])
+        self.assertEqual(repr(tree), "<ErrorTree (2 total errors)>")
+
+    def test_repr_empty(self):
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree([])
+        self.assertEqual(repr(tree), "<ErrorTree (0 total errors)>")
+
+
+class TestErrorInitReprStr(TestCase):
+    def make_error(self, **kwargs):
+        defaults = dict(
+            message="hello",
+            validator="type",
+            validator_value="string",
+            instance=5,
+            schema={"type": "string"},
+        )
+        defaults.update(kwargs)
+        return exceptions.ValidationError(**defaults)
+
+    def assertShows(self, expected, **kwargs):
+        expected = textwrap.dedent(expected).rstrip("\n")
+
+        error = self.make_error(**kwargs)
+        message_line, _, rest = str(error).partition("\n")
+        self.assertEqual(message_line, error.message)
+        self.assertEqual(rest, expected)
+
+    def test_it_calls_super_and_sets_args(self):
+        error = self.make_error()
+        self.assertGreater(len(error.args), 1)
+
+    def test_repr(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            repr(exceptions.ValidationError(message="Hello!")),
+            "<ValidationError: 'Hello!'>",
+        )
+
+    def test_unset_error(self):
+        error = exceptions.ValidationError("message")
+        self.assertEqual(str(error), "message")
+
+        kwargs = {
+            "validator": "type",
+            "validator_value": "string",
+            "instance": 5,
+            "schema": {"type": "string"},
+        }
+        # Just the message should show if any of the attributes are unset
+        for attr in kwargs:
+            k = dict(kwargs)
+            del k[attr]
+            error = exceptions.ValidationError("message", **k)
+            self.assertEqual(str(error), "message")
+
+    def test_empty_paths(self):
+        self.assertShows(
+            """
+            Failed validating 'type' in schema:
+                {'type': 'string'}
+
+            On instance:
+                5
+            """,
+            path=[],
+            schema_path=[],
+        )
+
+    def test_one_item_paths(self):
+        self.assertShows(
+            """
+            Failed validating 'type' in schema:
+                {'type': 'string'}
+
+            On instance[0]:
+                5
+            """,
+            path=[0],
+            schema_path=["items"],
+        )
+
+    def test_multiple_item_paths(self):
+        self.assertShows(
+            """
+            Failed validating 'type' in schema['items'][0]:
+                {'type': 'string'}
+
+            On instance[0]['a']:
+                5
+            """,
+            path=[0, "a"],
+            schema_path=["items", 0, 1],
+        )
+
+    def test_uses_pprint(self):
+        self.assertShows(
+            """
+            Failed validating 'maxLength' in schema:
+                {0: 0,
+                 1: 1,
+                 2: 2,
+                 3: 3,
+                 4: 4,
+                 5: 5,
+                 6: 6,
+                 7: 7,
+                 8: 8,
+                 9: 9,
+                 10: 10,
+                 11: 11,
+                 12: 12,
+                 13: 13,
+                 14: 14,
+                 15: 15,
+                 16: 16,
+                 17: 17,
+                 18: 18,
+                 19: 19}
+
+            On instance:
+                [0,
+                 1,
+                 2,
+                 3,
+                 4,
+                 5,
+                 6,
+                 7,
+                 8,
+                 9,
+                 10,
+                 11,
+                 12,
+                 13,
+                 14,
+                 15,
+                 16,
+                 17,
+                 18,
+                 19,
+                 20,
+                 21,
+                 22,
+                 23,
+                 24]
+            """,
+            instance=list(range(25)),
+            schema=dict(zip(range(20), range(20))),
+            validator="maxLength",
+        )
+
+    def test_str_works_with_instances_having_overriden_eq_operator(self):
+        """
+        Check for #164 which rendered exceptions unusable when a
+        `ValidationError` involved instances with an `__eq__` method
+        that returned truthy values.
+        """
+
+        class DontEQMeBro:
+            def __eq__(this, other):  # pragma: no cover
+                self.fail("Don't!")
+
+            def __ne__(this, other):  # pragma: no cover
+                self.fail("Don't!")
+
+        instance = DontEQMeBro()
+        error = exceptions.ValidationError(
+            "a message",
+            validator="foo",
+            instance=instance,
+            validator_value="some",
+            schema="schema",
+        )
+        self.assertIn(repr(instance), str(error))
+
+
+class TestHashable(TestCase):
+    def test_hashable(self):
+        set([exceptions.ValidationError("")])
+        set([exceptions.SchemaError("")])

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/test_format.py

@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+"""
+Tests for the parts of jsonschema related to the :kw:`format` keyword.
+"""
+
+from unittest import TestCase
+
+from jsonschema import FormatChecker, ValidationError
+from jsonschema.exceptions import FormatError
+from jsonschema.validators import Draft4Validator
+
+BOOM = ValueError("Boom!")
+BANG = ZeroDivisionError("Bang!")
+
+
+def boom(thing):
+    if thing == "bang":
+        raise BANG
+    raise BOOM
+
+
+class TestFormatChecker(TestCase):
+    def test_it_can_validate_no_formats(self):
+        checker = FormatChecker(formats=())
+        self.assertFalse(checker.checkers)
+
+    def test_it_raises_a_key_error_for_unknown_formats(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(KeyError):
+            FormatChecker(formats=["o noes"])
+
+    def test_it_can_register_cls_checkers(self):
+        original = dict(FormatChecker.checkers)
+        self.addCleanup(FormatChecker.checkers.pop, "boom")
+        with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning):
+            FormatChecker.cls_checks("boom")(boom)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            FormatChecker.checkers,
+            dict(original, boom=(boom, ())),
+        )
+
+    def test_it_can_register_checkers(self):
+        checker = FormatChecker()
+        checker.checks("boom")(boom)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            checker.checkers,
+            dict(FormatChecker.checkers, boom=(boom, ())),
+        )
+
+    def test_it_catches_registered_errors(self):
+        checker = FormatChecker()
+        checker.checks("boom", raises=type(BOOM))(boom)
+
+        with self.assertRaises(FormatError) as cm:
+            checker.check(instance=12, format="boom")
+
+        self.assertIs(cm.exception.cause, BOOM)
+        self.assertIs(cm.exception.__cause__, BOOM)
+        self.assertEqual(str(cm.exception), "12 is not a 'boom'")
+
+        # Unregistered errors should not be caught
+        with self.assertRaises(type(BANG)):
+            checker.check(instance="bang", format="boom")
+
+    def test_format_error_causes_become_validation_error_causes(self):
+        checker = FormatChecker()
+        checker.checks("boom", raises=ValueError)(boom)
+        validator = Draft4Validator({"format": "boom"}, format_checker=checker)
+
+        with self.assertRaises(ValidationError) as cm:
+            validator.validate("BOOM")
+
+        self.assertIs(cm.exception.cause, BOOM)
+        self.assertIs(cm.exception.__cause__, BOOM)
+
+    def test_format_checkers_come_with_defaults(self):
+        # This is bad :/ but relied upon.
+        # The docs for quite awhile recommended people do things like
+        # validate(..., format_checker=FormatChecker())
+        # We should change that, but we can't without deprecation...
+        checker = FormatChecker()
+        with self.assertRaises(FormatError):
+            checker.check(instance="not-an-ipv4", format="ipv4")
+
+    def test_repr(self):
+        checker = FormatChecker(formats=())
+        checker.checks("foo")(lambda thing: True)  # pragma: no cover
+        checker.checks("bar")(lambda thing: True)  # pragma: no cover
+        checker.checks("baz")(lambda thing: True)  # pragma: no cover
+        self.assertEqual(
+            repr(checker),
+            "<FormatChecker checkers=['bar', 'baz', 'foo']>",
+        )

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/test_jsonschema_test_suite.py

@@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
+"""
+Test runner for the JSON Schema official test suite
+
+Tests comprehensive correctness of each draft's validator.
+
+See https://github.com/json-schema-org/JSON-Schema-Test-Suite for details.
+"""
+
+import sys
+
+from jsonschema.tests._suite import Suite
+import jsonschema
+
+SUITE = Suite()
+DRAFT3 = SUITE.version(name="draft3")
+DRAFT4 = SUITE.version(name="draft4")
+DRAFT6 = SUITE.version(name="draft6")
+DRAFT7 = SUITE.version(name="draft7")
+DRAFT201909 = SUITE.version(name="draft2019-09")
+DRAFT202012 = SUITE.version(name="draft2020-12")
+
+
+def skip(message, **kwargs):
+    def skipper(test):
+        if all(value == getattr(test, attr) for attr, value in kwargs.items()):
+            return message
+    return skipper
+
+
+def missing_format(Validator):
+    def missing_format(test):  # pragma: no cover
+        schema = test.schema
+        if (
+            schema is True
+            or schema is False
+            or "format" not in schema
+            or schema["format"] in Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER.checkers
+            or test.valid
+        ):
+            return
+
+        return f"Format checker {schema['format']!r} not found."
+    return missing_format
+
+
+def complex_email_validation(test):
+    if test.subject != "email":
+        return
+
+    message = "Complex email validation is (intentionally) unsupported."
+    return skip(
+        message=message,
+        description="an invalid domain",
+    )(test) or skip(
+        message=message,
+        description="an invalid IPv4-address-literal",
+    )(test) or skip(
+        message=message,
+        description="dot after local part is not valid",
+    )(test) or skip(
+        message=message,
+        description="dot before local part is not valid",
+    )(test) or skip(
+        message=message,
+        description="two subsequent dots inside local part are not valid",
+    )(test)
+
+
+if sys.version_info < (3, 9):  # pragma: no cover
+    message = "Rejecting leading zeros is 3.9+"
+    allowed_leading_zeros = skip(
+        message=message,
+        subject="ipv4",
+        description="invalid leading zeroes, as they are treated as octals",
+    )
+else:
+    def allowed_leading_zeros(test):  # pragma: no cover
+        return
+
+
+def leap_second(test):
+    message = "Leap seconds are unsupported."
+    return skip(
+        message=message,
+        subject="time",
+        description="a valid time string with leap second",
+    )(test) or skip(
+        message=message,
+        subject="time",
+        description="a valid time string with leap second, Zulu",
+    )(test) or skip(
+        message=message,
+        subject="time",
+        description="a valid time string with leap second with offset",
+    )(test) or skip(
+        message=message,
+        subject="time",
+        description="valid leap second, positive time-offset",
+    )(test) or skip(
+        message=message,
+        subject="time",
+        description="valid leap second, negative time-offset",
+    )(test) or skip(
+        message=message,
+        subject="time",
+        description="valid leap second, large positive time-offset",
+    )(test) or skip(
+        message=message,
+        subject="time",
+        description="valid leap second, large negative time-offset",
+    )(test) or skip(
+        message=message,
+        subject="time",
+        description="valid leap second, zero time-offset",
+    )(test) or skip(
+        message=message,
+        subject="date-time",
+        description="a valid date-time with a leap second, UTC",
+    )(test) or skip(
+        message=message,
+        subject="date-time",
+        description="a valid date-time with a leap second, with minus offset",
+    )(test)
+
+
+TestDraft3 = DRAFT3.to_unittest_testcase(
+    DRAFT3.cases(),
+    DRAFT3.format_cases(),
+    DRAFT3.optional_cases_of(name="bignum"),
+    DRAFT3.optional_cases_of(name="non-bmp-regex"),
+    DRAFT3.optional_cases_of(name="zeroTerminatedFloats"),
+    Validator=jsonschema.Draft3Validator,
+    format_checker=jsonschema.Draft3Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER,
+    skip=lambda test: (
+        missing_format(jsonschema.Draft3Validator)(test)
+        or complex_email_validation(test)
+    ),
+)
+
+
+TestDraft4 = DRAFT4.to_unittest_testcase(
+    DRAFT4.cases(),
+    DRAFT4.format_cases(),
+    DRAFT4.optional_cases_of(name="bignum"),
+    DRAFT4.optional_cases_of(name="float-overflow"),
+    DRAFT4.optional_cases_of(name="non-bmp-regex"),
+    DRAFT4.optional_cases_of(name="zeroTerminatedFloats"),
+    Validator=jsonschema.Draft4Validator,
+    format_checker=jsonschema.Draft4Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER,
+    skip=lambda test: (
+        allowed_leading_zeros(test)
+        or leap_second(test)
+        or missing_format(jsonschema.Draft4Validator)(test)
+        or complex_email_validation(test)
+    ),
+)
+
+
+TestDraft6 = DRAFT6.to_unittest_testcase(
+    DRAFT6.cases(),
+    DRAFT6.format_cases(),
+    DRAFT6.optional_cases_of(name="bignum"),
+    DRAFT6.optional_cases_of(name="float-overflow"),
+    DRAFT6.optional_cases_of(name="non-bmp-regex"),
+    Validator=jsonschema.Draft6Validator,
+    format_checker=jsonschema.Draft6Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER,
+    skip=lambda test: (
+        allowed_leading_zeros(test)
+        or leap_second(test)
+        or missing_format(jsonschema.Draft6Validator)(test)
+        or complex_email_validation(test)
+    ),
+)
+
+
+TestDraft7 = DRAFT7.to_unittest_testcase(
+    DRAFT7.cases(),
+    DRAFT7.format_cases(),
+    DRAFT7.optional_cases_of(name="bignum"),
+    DRAFT7.optional_cases_of(name="cross-draft"),
+    DRAFT7.optional_cases_of(name="float-overflow"),
+    DRAFT7.optional_cases_of(name="non-bmp-regex"),
+    Validator=jsonschema.Draft7Validator,
+    format_checker=jsonschema.Draft7Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER,
+    skip=lambda test: (
+        allowed_leading_zeros(test)
+        or leap_second(test)
+        or missing_format(jsonschema.Draft7Validator)(test)
+        or complex_email_validation(test)
+    ),
+)
+
+
+TestDraft201909 = DRAFT201909.to_unittest_testcase(
+    DRAFT201909.cases(),
+    DRAFT201909.optional_cases_of(name="bignum"),
+    DRAFT201909.optional_cases_of(name="cross-draft"),
+    DRAFT201909.optional_cases_of(name="float-overflow"),
+    DRAFT201909.optional_cases_of(name="non-bmp-regex"),
+    DRAFT201909.optional_cases_of(name="refOfUnknownKeyword"),
+    Validator=jsonschema.Draft201909Validator,
+    skip=skip(
+        message="Vocabulary support is still in-progress.",
+        subject="vocabulary",
+        description=(
+            "no validation: invalid number, but it still validates"
+        ),
+    ),
+)
+
+
+TestDraft201909Format = DRAFT201909.to_unittest_testcase(
+    DRAFT201909.format_cases(),
+    name="TestDraft201909Format",
+    Validator=jsonschema.Draft201909Validator,
+    format_checker=jsonschema.Draft201909Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER,
+    skip=lambda test: (
+        complex_email_validation(test)
+        or allowed_leading_zeros(test)
+        or leap_second(test)
+        or missing_format(jsonschema.Draft201909Validator)(test)
+        or complex_email_validation(test)
+    ),
+)
+
+
+TestDraft202012 = DRAFT202012.to_unittest_testcase(
+    DRAFT202012.cases(),
+    DRAFT202012.optional_cases_of(name="bignum"),
+    DRAFT202012.optional_cases_of(name="cross-draft"),
+    DRAFT202012.optional_cases_of(name="float-overflow"),
+    DRAFT202012.optional_cases_of(name="non-bmp-regex"),
+    DRAFT202012.optional_cases_of(name="refOfUnknownKeyword"),
+    Validator=jsonschema.Draft202012Validator,
+    skip=skip(
+        message="Vocabulary support is still in-progress.",
+        subject="vocabulary",
+        description=(
+            "no validation: invalid number, but it still validates"
+        ),
+    ),
+)
+
+
+TestDraft202012Format = DRAFT202012.to_unittest_testcase(
+    DRAFT202012.format_cases(),
+    name="TestDraft202012Format",
+    Validator=jsonschema.Draft202012Validator,
+    format_checker=jsonschema.Draft202012Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER,
+    skip=lambda test: (
+        complex_email_validation(test)
+        or allowed_leading_zeros(test)
+        or leap_second(test)
+        or missing_format(jsonschema.Draft202012Validator)(test)
+        or complex_email_validation(test)
+    ),
+)

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/test_types.py

@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
+"""
+Tests for the `TypeChecker`-based type interface.
+
+The actual correctness of the type checking is handled in
+`test_jsonschema_test_suite`; these tests check that TypeChecker
+functions correctly at a more granular level.
+"""
+from collections import namedtuple
+from unittest import TestCase
+
+from jsonschema import ValidationError, _keywords
+from jsonschema._types import TypeChecker
+from jsonschema.exceptions import UndefinedTypeCheck, UnknownType
+from jsonschema.validators import Draft202012Validator, extend
+
+
+def equals_2(checker, instance):
+    return instance == 2
+
+
+def is_namedtuple(instance):
+    return isinstance(instance, tuple) and getattr(instance, "_fields", None)
+
+
+def is_object_or_named_tuple(checker, instance):
+    if Draft202012Validator.TYPE_CHECKER.is_type(instance, "object"):
+        return True
+    return is_namedtuple(instance)
+
+
+class TestTypeChecker(TestCase):
+    def test_is_type(self):
+        checker = TypeChecker({"two": equals_2})
+        self.assertEqual(
+            (
+                checker.is_type(instance=2, type="two"),
+                checker.is_type(instance="bar", type="two"),
+            ),
+            (True, False),
+        )
+
+    def test_is_unknown_type(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(UndefinedTypeCheck) as e:
+            TypeChecker().is_type(4, "foobar")
+        self.assertIn(
+            "'foobar' is unknown to this type checker",
+            str(e.exception),
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(
+            e.exception.__suppress_context__,
+            msg="Expected the internal KeyError to be hidden.",
+        )
+
+    def test_checks_can_be_added_at_init(self):
+        checker = TypeChecker({"two": equals_2})
+        self.assertEqual(checker, TypeChecker().redefine("two", equals_2))
+
+    def test_redefine_existing_type(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            TypeChecker().redefine("two", object()).redefine("two", equals_2),
+            TypeChecker().redefine("two", equals_2),
+        )
+
+    def test_remove(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            TypeChecker({"two": equals_2}).remove("two"),
+            TypeChecker(),
+        )
+
+    def test_remove_unknown_type(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(UndefinedTypeCheck) as context:
+            TypeChecker().remove("foobar")
+        self.assertIn("foobar", str(context.exception))
+
+    def test_redefine_many(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            TypeChecker().redefine_many({"foo": int, "bar": str}),
+            TypeChecker().redefine("foo", int).redefine("bar", str),
+        )
+
+    def test_remove_multiple(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            TypeChecker({"foo": int, "bar": str}).remove("foo", "bar"),
+            TypeChecker(),
+        )
+
+    def test_type_check_can_raise_key_error(self):
+        """
+        Make sure no one writes:
+
+            try:
+                self._type_checkers[type](...)
+            except KeyError:
+
+        ignoring the fact that the function itself can raise that.
+        """
+
+        error = KeyError("Stuff")
+
+        def raises_keyerror(checker, instance):
+            raise error
+
+        with self.assertRaises(KeyError) as context:
+            TypeChecker({"foo": raises_keyerror}).is_type(4, "foo")
+
+        self.assertIs(context.exception, error)
+
+    def test_repr(self):
+        checker = TypeChecker({"foo": is_namedtuple, "bar": is_namedtuple})
+        self.assertEqual(repr(checker), "<TypeChecker types={'bar', 'foo'}>")
+
+
+class TestCustomTypes(TestCase):
+    def test_simple_type_can_be_extended(self):
+        def int_or_str_int(checker, instance):
+            if not isinstance(instance, (int, str)):
+                return False
+            try:
+                int(instance)
+            except ValueError:
+                return False
+            return True
+
+        CustomValidator = extend(
+            Draft202012Validator,
+            type_checker=Draft202012Validator.TYPE_CHECKER.redefine(
+                "integer", int_or_str_int,
+            ),
+        )
+        validator = CustomValidator({"type": "integer"})
+
+        validator.validate(4)
+        validator.validate("4")
+
+        with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
+            validator.validate(4.4)
+
+        with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
+            validator.validate("foo")
+
+    def test_object_can_be_extended(self):
+        schema = {"type": "object"}
+
+        Point = namedtuple("Point", ["x", "y"])
+
+        type_checker = Draft202012Validator.TYPE_CHECKER.redefine(
+            "object", is_object_or_named_tuple,
+        )
+
+        CustomValidator = extend(
+            Draft202012Validator,
+            type_checker=type_checker,
+        )
+        validator = CustomValidator(schema)
+
+        validator.validate(Point(x=4, y=5))
+
+    def test_object_extensions_require_custom_validators(self):
+        schema = {"type": "object", "required": ["x"]}
+
+        type_checker = Draft202012Validator.TYPE_CHECKER.redefine(
+            "object", is_object_or_named_tuple,
+        )
+
+        CustomValidator = extend(
+            Draft202012Validator,
+            type_checker=type_checker,
+        )
+        validator = CustomValidator(schema)
+
+        Point = namedtuple("Point", ["x", "y"])
+        # Cannot handle required
+        with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
+            validator.validate(Point(x=4, y=5))
+
+    def test_object_extensions_can_handle_custom_validators(self):
+        schema = {
+            "type": "object",
+            "required": ["x"],
+            "properties": {"x": {"type": "integer"}},
+        }
+
+        type_checker = Draft202012Validator.TYPE_CHECKER.redefine(
+            "object", is_object_or_named_tuple,
+        )
+
+        def coerce_named_tuple(fn):
+            def coerced(validator, value, instance, schema):
+                if is_namedtuple(instance):
+                    instance = instance._asdict()
+                return fn(validator, value, instance, schema)
+            return coerced
+
+        required = coerce_named_tuple(_keywords.required)
+        properties = coerce_named_tuple(_keywords.properties)
+
+        CustomValidator = extend(
+            Draft202012Validator,
+            type_checker=type_checker,
+            validators={"required": required, "properties": properties},
+        )
+
+        validator = CustomValidator(schema)
+
+        Point = namedtuple("Point", ["x", "y"])
+        # Can now process required and properties
+        validator.validate(Point(x=4, y=5))
+
+        with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
+            validator.validate(Point(x="not an integer", y=5))
+
+        # As well as still handle objects.
+        validator.validate({"x": 4, "y": 5})
+
+        with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
+            validator.validate({"x": "not an integer", "y": 5})
+
+    def test_unknown_type(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(UnknownType) as e:
+            Draft202012Validator({}).is_type(12, "some unknown type")
+        self.assertIn("'some unknown type'", str(e.exception))

platform/dataops/dto/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/test_utils.py

@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+from unittest import TestCase
+
+from jsonschema._utils import equal
+
+
+class TestEqual(TestCase):
+    def test_none(self):
+        self.assertTrue(equal(None, None))
+
+
+class TestDictEqual(TestCase):
+    def test_equal_dictionaries(self):
+        dict_1 = {"a": "b", "c": "d"}
+        dict_2 = {"c": "d", "a": "b"}
+        self.assertTrue(equal(dict_1, dict_2))
+
+    def test_missing_key(self):
+        dict_1 = {"a": "b", "c": "d"}
+        dict_2 = {"c": "d", "x": "b"}
+        self.assertFalse(equal(dict_1, dict_2))
+
+    def test_additional_key(self):
+        dict_1 = {"a": "b", "c": "d"}
+        dict_2 = {"c": "d", "a": "b", "x": "x"}
+        self.assertFalse(equal(dict_1, dict_2))
+
+    def test_missing_value(self):
+        dict_1 = {"a": "b", "c": "d"}
+        dict_2 = {"c": "d", "a": "x"}
+        self.assertFalse(equal(dict_1, dict_2))
+
+    def test_empty_dictionaries(self):
+        dict_1 = {}
+        dict_2 = {}
+        self.assertTrue(equal(dict_1, dict_2))
+
+    def test_one_none(self):
+        dict_1 = None
+        dict_2 = {"a": "b", "c": "d"}
+        self.assertFalse(equal(dict_1, dict_2))
+
+    def test_same_item(self):
+        dict_1 = {"a": "b", "c": "d"}
+        self.assertTrue(equal(dict_1, dict_1))
+
+    def test_nested_equal(self):
+        dict_1 = {"a": {"a": "b", "c": "d"}, "c": "d"}
+        dict_2 = {"c": "d", "a": {"a": "b", "c": "d"}}
+        self.assertTrue(equal(dict_1, dict_2))
+
+    def test_nested_dict_unequal(self):
+        dict_1 = {"a": {"a": "b", "c": "d"}, "c": "d"}
+        dict_2 = {"c": "d", "a": {"a": "b", "c": "x"}}
+        self.assertFalse(equal(dict_1, dict_2))
+
+    def test_mixed_nested_equal(self):
+        dict_1 = {"a": ["a", "b", "c", "d"], "c": "d"}
+        dict_2 = {"c": "d", "a": ["a", "b", "c", "d"]}
+        self.assertTrue(equal(dict_1, dict_2))
+
+    def test_nested_list_unequal(self):
+        dict_1 = {"a": ["a", "b", "c", "d"], "c": "d"}
+        dict_2 = {"c": "d", "a": ["b", "c", "d", "a"]}
+        self.assertFalse(equal(dict_1, dict_2))
+
+
+class TestListEqual(TestCase):
+    def test_equal_lists(self):
+        list_1 = ["a", "b", "c"]
+        list_2 = ["a", "b", "c"]
+        self.assertTrue(equal(list_1, list_2))
+
+    def test_unsorted_lists(self):
+        list_1 = ["a", "b", "c"]
+        list_2 = ["b", "b", "a"]
+        self.assertFalse(equal(list_1, list_2))
+
+    def test_first_list_larger(self):
+        list_1 = ["a", "b", "c"]
+        list_2 = ["a", "b"]
+        self.assertFalse(equal(list_1, list_2))
+
+    def test_second_list_larger(self):
+        list_1 = ["a", "b"]
+        list_2 = ["a", "b", "c"]
+        self.assertFalse(equal(list_1, list_2))
+
+    def test_list_with_none_unequal(self):
+        list_1 = ["a", "b", None]
+        list_2 = ["a", "b", "c"]
+        self.assertFalse(equal(list_1, list_2))
+
+        list_1 = ["a", "b", None]
+        list_2 = [None, "b", "c"]
+        self.assertFalse(equal(list_1, list_2))
+
+    def test_list_with_none_equal(self):
+        list_1 = ["a", None, "c"]
+        list_2 = ["a", None, "c"]
+        self.assertTrue(equal(list_1, list_2))
+
+    def test_empty_list(self):
+        list_1 = []
+        list_2 = []
+        self.assertTrue(equal(list_1, list_2))
+
+    def test_one_none(self):
+        list_1 = None
+        list_2 = []
+        self.assertFalse(equal(list_1, list_2))
+
+    def test_same_list(self):
+        list_1 = ["a", "b", "c"]
+        self.assertTrue(equal(list_1, list_1))
+
+    def test_equal_nested_lists(self):
+        list_1 = ["a", ["b", "c"], "d"]
+        list_2 = ["a", ["b", "c"], "d"]
+        self.assertTrue(equal(list_1, list_2))
+
+    def test_unequal_nested_lists(self):
+        list_1 = ["a", ["b", "c"], "d"]
+        list_2 = ["a", [], "c"]
+        self.assertFalse(equal(list_1, list_2))