File size: 12,480 Bytes
6f2ed01 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 | #!/usr/bin/env python
"""AI Judge: semantic answer clustering, then correctness. [GPU] (protocol 3)
python src/judge_run.py --model Llama-3.2-1B
Two passes, in the order protocol 3 mandates:
Pass 1 REFERENCE-BLIND. The judge never sees the gold answer. It only groups
responses that assert the same thing -- "Paris", "The answer is
Paris.", "巴黎" -- and flags ABSTAIN / MULTIPLE / UNPARSEABLE.
This is what BCS and BES are built on, and keeping gold out of it is
what lets a confidently wrong model score BCS = 1.
Pass 2 REFERENCE-AWARE. Gold, aliases, answer type and granularity are
supplied, and each CLUSTER (not each response) is labelled. This only
separates Stable Correct from Stable Wrong; it never reshapes a
cluster.
The unit of judgement is the (fact, model) pair, per protocol 3.1: judging pairs
of responses independently would produce non-transitive verdicts, where a~b and
b~c but a!~c, and no consistent cluster assignment exists.
Cost control: responses are pre-grouped by normalised surface string before the
judge sees them. Exact post-normalisation identity is a strict subset of
semantic equivalence, so the judge can only ever merge those groups further,
never split them -- the clustering is unchanged, but a typical fact sends 3-6
distinct strings instead of 17 responses.
"""
import os, sys, json, time, argparse, re
import torch
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))
import mcommon as mc
sys.path.insert(0, mc.runner_dir())
from common import normalize # noqa: E402
BLIND = """You are clustering short answers to one factual question. You are NOT told the correct answer and must not guess it.
Question: {question}
Candidate answers:
{answers}
Work in two steps, exactly as follows.
Step 1. For each answer, extract ONLY the core entity or value it finally asserts. Strip restated question text, subject names, hedging, reasoning and trailing explanation. "Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada applies in Canada" asserts "Canada". "The answer is Paris." asserts "Paris".
Step 2. Group the answers whose EXTRACTED core is the same entity or value. Ignore wording, language, punctuation and capitalisation; translations of one another belong together, and a bare entity belongs with a full sentence asserting that same entity. Two answers go in different groups only when they name genuinely different entities.
Use these special groups where they apply:
- ABSTAIN: refuses, or says it does not know
- MULTIPLE: gives several conflicting answers without choosing
- UNPARSEABLE: no answer can be extracted
Reply with JSON only, where "meaning" is the extracted core from step 1:
{{"clusters":[{{"ids":[0,2],"meaning":"Paris","status":"ANSWER"}},{{"ids":[1],"meaning":"","status":"ABSTAIN"}}]}}
Every id from 0 to {last} must appear exactly once."""
AWARE = """Judge whether each proposed answer is correct for this question.
Question: {question}
Correct answer: {gold}
Also acceptable: {aliases}
Answer type: {atype} ({gran})
Proposed answers:
{answers}
Label each one:
- CORRECT: same entity/value as the correct answer, any wording or language
- INCORRECT: a different entity/value
- ABSTAIN: a refusal or "I don't know"
- AMBIGUOUS: could refer to the correct answer but is too vague to tell
- REVIEW_REQUIRED: cannot decide
Reply with JSON only: {{"labels":["CORRECT","INCORRECT"]}} with exactly {n} entries in order."""
def parse_json(text):
"""Judges emit prose around the JSON often enough that this must be robust."""
m = re.search(r"\{.*\}", text, re.S)
if not m:
return None
try:
return json.loads(m.group(0))
except json.JSONDecodeError:
try:
return json.loads(re.sub(r",\s*([}\]])", r"\1", m.group(0)))
except json.JSONDecodeError:
return None
def generate(model, tok, prompts, max_new, batch):
outs = []
for i in range(0, len(prompts), batch):
chunk = prompts[i:i + batch]
texts = [tok.apply_chat_template([{"role": "user", "content": p}],
tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
for p in chunk]
enc = tok(texts, return_tensors="pt", padding=True, truncation=True,
max_length=2048).to(0)
with torch.no_grad():
g = model.generate(**enc, max_new_tokens=max_new, do_sample=False,
num_beams=1, pad_token_id=tok.pad_token_id)
outs += tok.batch_decode(g[:, enc["input_ids"].shape[1]:],
skip_special_tokens=True)
return outs
def main():
ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
ap.add_argument("--model", required=True, help="the model being judged")
ap.add_argument("--judge", default=None)
ap.add_argument("--batch", type=int, default=32)
ap.add_argument("--limit", type=int, default=0, help="debug: first N facts")
ap.add_argument("--sample", type=int, default=0,
help="judge a fixed random subset of facts instead of all 2,592")
ap.add_argument("--sample-seed", type=int, default=20260101)
ap.add_argument("--resume", action="store_true")
args = ap.parse_args()
judge_name = args.judge or mc.models_cfg()["auxiliary_models"]["judge"]["name"]
if judge_name == args.model:
raise SystemExit("the judge must not judge itself (MODEL_SELECTION_20 section 6)")
fams = set(mc.cfg()["main_families"])
gen_path = mc.generations(args.model)
if not os.path.exists(gen_path):
raise SystemExit(
f"no generations for {args.model}: {gen_path}\n"
f"run python runner/eval_run.py --model {args.model} first")
qmeta = {r["query_id"]: r for r in mc.main_forward_queries()}
by_fact = {}
for r in mc.read_jsonl(gen_path):
if r["condition_family"] not in fams or r["query_id"] not in qmeta:
continue
by_fact.setdefault(r["fact_id"], []).append(r)
fact_ids = sorted(by_fact)
if args.sample and args.sample < len(fact_ids):
# Drawn from the FULL benchmark fact list with a fixed seed, not from
# this model's own facts, so every model is judged on an identical
# subset. Sampling per model would make BCS/BES incomparable, which is
# exactly what protocol 1.3 forbids.
import numpy as np
allf = sorted(mc.facts())
rng = np.random.default_rng(args.sample_seed)
pick = set(np.array(allf)[rng.choice(len(allf), size=args.sample,
replace=False)].tolist())
fact_ids = [f for f in fact_ids if f in pick]
if args.limit:
fact_ids = fact_ids[:args.limit]
dest = mc.out("metrics", "judge", f"{args.model}.jsonl")
done = set()
if args.resume and os.path.exists(dest):
done = {r["fact_id"] for r in mc.read_jsonl(dest)}
fact_ids = [f for f in fact_ids if f not in done]
if not fact_ids:
print(f"[{args.model}] judge already complete")
return
facts = mc.facts()
# Pre-group by normalised surface: a strict subset of semantic equivalence,
# so this changes cost and not the clustering the judge can express.
tasks = []
for fid in fact_ids:
recs = by_fact[fid]
groups = {}
for r in recs:
key = normalize(r["raw_response"].strip().split("\n")[0][:120])
groups.setdefault(key, []).append(r["query_id"])
surfaces = list(groups)
display = [next(x["raw_response"].strip().split("\n")[0][:120]
for x in recs if normalize(
x["raw_response"].strip().split("\n")[0][:120]) == s) or "(empty)"
for s in surfaces]
tasks.append({"fact_id": fid, "surfaces": surfaces, "display": display,
"groups": [groups[s] for s in surfaces],
"question": facts[fid]["qualification_question"]})
path = mc.model_path(judge_name)
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(path)
if tok.pad_token is None:
tok.pad_token = tok.eos_token
tok.padding_side = "left"
judge = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
path, dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map={"": 0}).eval()
t0 = time.time()
out_f = open(dest, "a" if done else "w")
for i in range(0, len(tasks), args.batch):
chunk = tasks[i:i + args.batch]
p1 = [BLIND.format(question=t["question"], last=len(t["display"]) - 1,
answers="\n".join(f"{j}. {d}" for j, d in enumerate(t["display"])))
for t in chunk]
r1 = generate(judge, tok, p1, 512, args.batch)
for t, raw in zip(chunk, r1):
js = parse_json(raw) or {}
clusters, seen = [], set()
for c in js.get("clusters", []):
ids = [int(x) for x in c.get("ids", [])
if isinstance(x, (int, float)) and 0 <= int(x) < len(t["display"])
and int(x) not in seen]
if not ids:
continue
seen.update(ids)
clusters.append({"ids": ids, "meaning": str(c.get("meaning", ""))[:80],
"status": str(c.get("status", "ANSWER")).upper()})
# Anything the judge dropped or mangled stays its own cluster rather
# than vanishing: silently losing a response would change the BCS
# denominator for that fact.
for j in range(len(t["display"])):
if j not in seen:
clusters.append({"ids": [j], "meaning": t["display"][j][:80],
"status": "ANSWER", "recovered": True})
t["clusters"] = clusters
t["judge_raw_blind"] = raw[:400]
p2, own = [], []
for t in chunk:
f = facts[t["fact_id"]]
answer = [c["meaning"] or t["display"][c["ids"][0]] for c in t["clusters"]]
p2.append(AWARE.format(
question=t["question"], gold=f["object"]["canonical"],
aliases=", ".join(f["object"]["aliases"][:10]),
atype=f.get("answer_type", "entity"),
gran=f.get("answer_granularity", "entity"),
answers="\n".join(f"{j}. {a}" for j, a in enumerate(answer)),
n=len(answer)))
own.append(t)
r2 = generate(judge, tok, p2, 256, args.batch)
for t, raw in zip(own, r2):
js = parse_json(raw) or {}
labels = [str(x).upper() for x in js.get("labels", [])]
for j, c in enumerate(t["clusters"]):
lab = labels[j] if j < len(labels) else "REVIEW_REQUIRED"
if c["status"] in ("ABSTAIN", "MULTIPLE", "UNPARSEABLE"):
lab = c["status"] if c["status"] == "ABSTAIN" else "REVIEW_REQUIRED"
c["correctness"] = lab
t["judge_raw_aware"] = raw[:400]
for t in chunk:
rows = []
for k, c in enumerate(t["clusters"]):
cid = f"C{k}" if c["status"] == "ANSWER" else c["status"]
for j in c["ids"]:
for qid in t["groups"][j]:
rows.append({"query_id": qid,
"condition_family": qmeta[qid]["condition_family"],
"cluster_id": cid})
out_f.write(json.dumps({
"model": args.model, "judge": judge_name, "fact_id": t["fact_id"],
"clusters": [{"cluster_id": f"C{k}" if c["status"] == "ANSWER"
else c["status"],
"canonical_meaning": c["meaning"],
"status": c["status"],
"correctness": c.get("correctness", "REVIEW_REQUIRED")}
for k, c in enumerate(t["clusters"])],
"assignments": rows}, ensure_ascii=False) + "\n")
out_f.flush()
d = i + len(chunk)
print(f" {d}/{len(tasks)} facts {d / max(time.time() - t0, 1e-9):.2f}/s",
flush=True)
out_f.close()
print(f"[{args.model}] judged {len(tasks)} facts with {judge_name} JUDGE_DONE",
flush=True)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
|