Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -6,4 +6,100 @@ language:
|
|
| 6 |
pretty_name: The ICL consistency test
|
| 7 |
size_categories:
|
| 8 |
- 100K<n<1M
|
| 9 |
-
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
pretty_name: The ICL consistency test
|
| 7 |
size_categories:
|
| 8 |
- 100K<n<1M
|
| 9 |
+
---
|
| 10 |
+
# The ICL consistency test
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
This 🤗 dataset provides data for the [GenBench CBT task 'The ICL consistency test'](https://github.com/GenBench/genbench_cbt/tree/main/src/genbench/tasks/icl_consistency_test).
|
| 13 |
+
The ICL consistency test measures the consistency of LLM predictions on the same data points across many different equivalent prompting setups.
|
| 14 |
+
The score in the associated metric (Cohen's kappa) can be understood as a measure of a model's prediction consistency in the face of task-irrelevant information.
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
For an easy evaluation of any 🤗 models, we refer to the code provided in the GenBench task. For in-depth information on the task, we refer to the associated
|
| 17 |
+
publications ([Weber et al., 2023](https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04945),[2023](https://aclanthology.org/2023.conll-1.20/)) and the respective GenBench [doc.md](https://github.com/GenBench/genbench_cbt/blob/main/src/genbench/tasks/icl_consistency_test/doc.md).
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
Evaluation on the relevant metrics can be done via the _example_evaluation.py_ script in the [GenBench repository](https://github.com/GenBench/genbench_cbt/blob/main/src/genbench/tasks/icl_consistency_test/).
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
### Dataset Description
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
_Abstract_: The ICL consistency test measures the consistency of LLM predictions on the same data points across many different prompting setups. Different setups are defined by "factors".
|
| 24 |
+
On the one hand, factors can be specific attributes of the used prompt (e.g. the number of examples the model is presented with ["n_shots"] or the type of instructions
|
| 25 |
+
that were used to wrap a specific datapoint ["Instructions"]). On the other hand, the analysis can also be augmented by factors that are related to the way a model is
|
| 26 |
+
evaluated (e.g. whether a model is calibrated) or the type of model that is evaluated (e.g. the number of parameters or instructions tuning). These external factors can
|
| 27 |
+
be added to the analysis by using the task.add_factor() method. The output metric is Cohen's kappa for each factor across all different conditions. A kappa value close to
|
| 28 |
+
1 indicates that the factors do not change the model prediction, while a factor close to 0 strongly changes model predictions. The ICL consistency test has two subtasks,
|
| 29 |
+
one evaluating the ANLI-dataset ([Nie et al., 2019](https://aclanthology.org/N18-1101/)); the other the MNLI-dataset ([Wang et al., 2017](https://aclanthology.org/N18-1101/)).
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
_Size_: Each subtask contains 57600 when using the full 600 data_IDs. The user can choose to reduce the number of evaluated data_IDs.
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
- **Curated by:**
|
| 34 |
+
- resampling and arrangement was done by [Weber et al., 2023](https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04945),[2023](https://aclanthology.org/2023.conll-1.20/);
|
| 35 |
+
- original data were curated by [Nie et al., 2019](https://aclanthology.org/N18-1101/) (ANLI) and [Wang et al., 2017](https://aclanthology.org/N18-1101/) (MNLI);
|
| 36 |
+
- templates were curated by [Bach et al., 2022](https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-demo.9/) (promptsource).
|
| 37 |
+
- **Language:** English
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
### Dataset Sources (basic links)
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
- **Repository:** Data files on [github](https://github.com/LucWeber/icl_consistency_data).
|
| 42 |
+
- **Paper:** [Weber et al., 2023](https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04945),[2023](https://aclanthology.org/2023.conll-1.20/).
|
| 43 |
+
- **Demo:** Find pre-implemented code to evaluate any 🤗 model on [github](https://github.com/GenBench/genbench_cbt/blob/main/src/genbench/tasks/icl_consistency_test/example_evaluation.py).
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
## Uses
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
In prompting, models are sensitive to task-irrelevant information in their prompt. This test can be used to quantify this sensitivity of any 🤗 model. The ICL consistency test does this by measuring a model's prediction consistency across many different semantically equivalent prompting setups.
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
## Dataset Structure
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
<!-- This section provides a description of the dataset fields, and additional information about the dataset structure such as criteria used to create the splits,
|
| 52 |
+
relationships between data points, etc. -->
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
[_TBA_]
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
## Dataset Creation
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
The data is a sample from the [MNLI](https://aclanthology.org/N18-1101/) and [ANLI](https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.441/) datasets as well as prompt templates from [promptsource](https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-demo.9/).
|
| 59 |
+
Please refer to the original publications's documentation for detailed information on dataset creation.
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
This dataset contains data from the [MNLI](https://aclanthology.org/N18-1101/) and [ANLI](https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.441/) datasets and adheres to the same biases, risks and limitations.
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
### Recommendations
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
We identify the following limitations of the consistency test:
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
1. The number of factors is limited and does not cover all possible factors that might influence the predictions. We limited ourselves to factors we deem relevant, to ensure fast evaluation.
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
2. Currently, the test is only implemented for the ANLI- and MNLI-datasets.
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
3. Factors that are external to the dataset but should be considered in the analysis (e.g. _instruction tuning_ or _calibration_) have to be manually added by the user
|
| 74 |
+
using the task.add_factor() method (please use the GenBench implementation of the dataset. You can find it on [github](https://github.com/GenBench/genbench_cbt/tree/main/src/genbench/tasks/icl_consistency_test)).
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
## Citation
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
This dataset was used in the following publications. If you use it, please consider citing the following references:
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
**BibTeX:**
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
```
|
| 84 |
+
@inproceedings{weber2023mind,
|
| 85 |
+
title={Mind the instructions: a holistic evaluation of consistency and interactions in prompt-based learning},
|
| 86 |
+
author={Weber, Lucas and Bruni, Elia and Hupkes, Dieuwke},
|
| 87 |
+
booktitle={Proceedings of the 27th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL)},
|
| 88 |
+
pages={294--313},
|
| 89 |
+
year={2023}
|
| 90 |
+
}
|
| 91 |
+
```
|
| 92 |
+
```
|
| 93 |
+
@article{weber2023icl,
|
| 94 |
+
title={The ICL Consistency Test},
|
| 95 |
+
author={Weber, Lucas and Bruni, Elia and Hupkes, Dieuwke},
|
| 96 |
+
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.04945},
|
| 97 |
+
year={2023}
|
| 98 |
+
}
|
| 99 |
+
```
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
## Dataset Card Authors
|
| 102 |
+
[Lucas Weber](https://lucweber.github.io/)
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
## Dataset Card Contact
|
| 105 |
+
lucasweber000@gmail.com
|