Instruction stringlengths 30 171 | Response stringlengths 16 2.91k |
|---|---|
What does 'Union Of India Represented By General vs P. Kunhabdulla on 31 August, 1984' say about Repression? |
1The next ground urged on behalf of the appellants is that the learned single Judge had gone wrong in holding that the charge against the respondent has not been proved. As noticed, the charge against the respondent was under Rules 3(1)(i), 3(1)(iii) and 19of the Railway Services (Conduct) Rules, 196The allegation ... |
What does 'K. Omprakash vs K. Nalini on 15 July, 1985' say about divorce? |
of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolving his marriage with his respondent-wife. The petitioning husband is the respondent's maternal uncle. This appears to be a case of familiarity breeding contempt rendering attraction of novelty absent. The parties are Hindus and their marriage took place on 19th Feb., 197B... |
What does 'Chitra Lekha vs Ranjit Rai on 30 July, 1976' say about Alimony? |
The material facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. The parties had been married on 28th June, 197The respondent husband filed a petition for judicial separation on the ground of cruelty under S. 10(1)(b) of the Act. This petition was dismissed with costs in 197During the pendency of the petition the appellant,... |
What does 'Kamalakshi vs Ramasami Chetti on 16 December, 1895' say about Repression,? |
"The reason why no proceeding can be taken by an infant without the assistance of a next friend is, as stated in Daniell's Chancery Practice, 6th Edition, p. 105, 'on account of an infant's supposed want of discretion, and his inability to bind himself and make himself liable for costs.' And it would seem that the r... |
What does 'Channing Arnold vs The Emperor on 7 April, 1914' say about Repression,? |
, was not unlikely to lead to confusion; but it is at least satisfactory to find that the learned Judge in charging the jury made no mistake in stating what the true issue was, It is admitted by the appellant's counsel that this is so. " What you will have to consider," said the learned Judge to the jury, is " whethe... |
What does 'Shafi Ullah vs Emperor on 19 February, 1934' say about Bigamy? |
of the Indian Penal Code, i.e., for abetting a bigamy. Mt. Majidan, when she was a minor, was married to one Tufail Ahmad, She did not live with her husband and after attaining the age of puberty she married again one Himayat Ullah. Himayat Ullah, Mt. Majidan and Shafi Ullah, a relation of Mt. Majidan, were charged; ... |
What does 'Dr. Ranjit Kumar Bhattacharyya vs Smt. Sabita Bhattacharyya on 22 December, 1995' say about Void marriage? |
The defendant No. I/appellant in his written statement, however, categorically denied and disputed the allegations of the plaintiff that she was her lawfully married wife and that he had any obligation to maintain her and that the alleged marriage had taken place at all, but admitted that the plaintiff/respondent, wh... |
What does 'Dinesh vs State Of Haryana on 25 April, 2014' say about dowry? | Assailing the impugned judgment of conviction, Mr. Rishi
Malhotra, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, firstly
contended that in absence of evidence that the deceased soon before her |
What does 'Rohtash vs State Of Haryana on 22 May, 2012' say about dowry? | Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that:
A. On 4.7.1989 at 8.00 p.m., Jiwan (PW.1) made a statement
(Ext.PC) before the police at Rohtak Chowk, Kharkohda to the effect |
What does 'Arun Singh vs State Of U.P. on 10 February, 2020' say about dowry? | Shorn of unnecessary details the brief facts which led to the filling of
Respondent No. 2 lodged First Information Report with Police
herein which was registered as case crime No. 431 of 201The |
What does 'Bhola Ram vs State Of Punjab on 11 November, 2013' say about dowry? | At the time of their marriage, Janki Devi’s family gave
their means to Darshan Ram and his family. But according to the
prosecution, his brothers Parshottam Ram and Bhola Ram (the appellant) and |
What does 'Bansi Lal vs State Of Haryana on 14 January, 2011' say about dowry? | Facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that the
appellant was married to Sarla (deceased) on 4th April, 198An FIR
was lodged by Shyam Lal (PW.4) father of Sarla (deceased) on 25th |
What does 'Manohar Lal vs State Of Haryana on 1 July, 2014' say about dowry? | Raj Rani (PW.1), mother of the deceased- Darshana @Phullan stated
that the accused married her daughter about five years back. The accused
used to harass her daughter on account of inadequacy of |
What does 'Smt. Sahana Pal vs U.K.Samanta on 24 July, 2015' say about dowry? | The petitioner averred that after the marriage, she was taken to
Bombay (Mumbai) at the matrimonial house on 10.11.2006, after a short trip
to Kullu-Manali. At the time of marriage, the respondent represented that he |
What does 'Mangat Ram vs State Of Haryana on 27 March, 2014' say about dowry? | We did not have the advantage of hearing any counsel on the side of
the State, even though, the hearing was going on for a couple of days.
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant took us through the depositions |
What does 'Wasim vs State Nct Of Delhi on 18 July, 2019' say about dowry? | The deceased Moniya who was working as a teacher
was married to the Appellant on 02.05.201PW-11 Sunita
deposed that her daughter Moniya was being harassed by |
What does 'Gangadharan vs T.K. Thankam on 27 January, 1988' say about divorce? | It is the common case of both parties that the appellant married the respondent on 30-8-1976 at Athavanad in Malappuram District. In the petition the appellant averred that immediately after the marriage the appellant took the respondent to his place of work at Kodumba in Palghat District and both of them were residin... |
Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 | Section Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Penalty for demanding dowry.— If any person demands, directly or indirectly, from the parents or other relatives or guardian of a bride or bridegroom, as the case may be, any dowry, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six... |
What does the article 'Gurudas v State of Maharashtra on 20 October 2015' say about marriage law? | the said judgment and order, the appellant is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code and is directed suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default, to suffer further RI for one month. Appellant is also convicted for the offence punishab... |
Section 3 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 | Union of India - Section Section 3 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Penalty for giving or taking dowry.— If any person, after the commencement of this Act, gives or takes or abets the giving or taking of dowry, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than five years, and with fine... |
Section 304B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 | Union of India - Section Section 304B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 304B. Dowry death.— Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or bodily injury or occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or h... |
What does 'Section 226 in The Income Tax Act, 1961' say about custody? | - [Where no certificate has been drawn up under section 222, the Assessing Officer may recover the tax by any one or more of the modes provided in this section.(1-A) Where a certificate has been drawn up under section 222, the Tax Recovery Officer may, without prejudice to the modes of recovery specified in that sectio... |
What does 'Section 3 in Income Tax Rules, 1962' say about Maintenance? | - For the purpose of computing the income chargeable under the head "Salaries", the value of perquisites provided by the employer directly or indirectly to the assessee (hereinafter referred to as employee) or to any member of his household by reason of his employment shall be determined in accordance with the followin... |
What does 'Section 2 in The Goa Children's Act, 2003' say about sexual issues? | - In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-
[In place of words 'authorized officer' the words 'special officers' substituted by Goa Children's (Amendment) Act, 2005 [Act No. 20 of 2005].]
means officers that are appointed as such under the provisions of this Act; |
What does 'Section 4 in The Repealing and Amending Act, 2017' say about divorce? | - The repeal by this Act of any enactment shall not affect any other enactment in which the repealed enactment has been applied, incorporated or referred to;
and this Act shall not affect the validity, invalidity, effect or consequences of anything already done or suffered, or any right, title, obligation or liabili... |
What does 'Section 4 in The Repealing and Amending Act, 2017' say about Inheritance rights divorce? | - The repeal by this Act of any enactment shall not affect any other enactment in which the repealed enactment has been applied, incorporated or referred to;and this Act shall not affect the validity, invalidity, effect or consequences of anything already done or suffered, or any right, title, obligation or liability a... |
What does 'Sridhar Dey vs Kalpana Dey on 22 September, 1986' say about Restitution of conjugal rights? | , Hindu Marriage Act, in favour of the respondent-wife and against the appellant-husband, Mr. Mitra, the learned Counsel for the appellant-husband, has very seriously urged that there was no marriage in fact between the parties to warrant the decree and that, even if there was a marriage in fact, there was no marriage ... |
What does 'Inderjit Kaur vs Rajinder Singh on 16 April, 1980' say about Restitution of conjugal rights? | , in particular, it has been repeatedly held that a decree cannot be passed unless all the requirements ofof the Hindu Marriage Act are established to the satisfaction of the court : seeSmt. Shanti Devi v. Balbir Singh Gupta and another |
What does 'Bini vs Sundaran on 12 December, 2007' say about (Hindu marital? | , the Rules framed by the High Court and the State, the amendedwould clearly show the role of conciliation for reconciliation/settlement of disputes in family affairs. The primary object is to promote and preserve the sacred union of parties to a marriage. Only if the attempts for reconciliation are not fruitful, the f... |
What does 'G.Nityanandam vs Tmt.D.Saritha on 16 April, 2013' say about guardianship? | :- Both the parents may jointly, or, in the event of the absence of one due to death, divorce, legal separation, desertion or conviction, may singly apply for
of their or as the case may be, his ward beyond the age of 18 years.
In the event of death, desertion, conviction of both the parents, the siblings (includ... |
What does 'Smt. Nupur vs Sandeep Sud on 8 March, 2002' say about interim maintenance? | . for permitting her to sue as an indigent person. Relief claimed in the petition is for the grant of. Along with this petition an application for grant ofduring the pendency of these proceedings, as well as the suit in the event of permission being allowed, has also been filed. |
What does 'Smt. Nupur vs Sandeep Sud on 8 March, 2002' say about interim maintenance? | . for permitting her to sue as an indigent person. Relief claimed in the petition is for the grant of. Along with this petition an application for grant ofduring the pendency of these proceedings, as well as the suit in the event of permission being allowed, has also been filed. |
What does 'Bai Jivi vs Narsing Lalbhai on 14 October, 1926' say about Restitution of conjugal rights? | . Nevertheless, it shows that abandonment of a wife may entitle her to separate maintenance from her husband., (1923) I.L.R. 46 All. 210 where the facts were somewhat similar to those here. There the plaintiff, who was a Brahman, had many years ago turned his wife out of doors because he suspected her chastity. The wif... |
What does 'Mrs.Yamuna Dhevi vs Mrs.D.Nalini' say about (Hindu marital? | . So when a deceased male member dies and the wife survives him, she is class I heir. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that in view of the fact that the petition for divorce was submitted before the death of Rajendra Prasad, she should be deemed to have been divorced and that the plaintiff was not the wife ... |
What does 'Section 7 in The Payment Of Wages Act, 1936' say about custody? | .-Notwithstanding the provisions of [the Railways Act, 1989 (, Section 6, for " sub-Section of Section 47 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 (9 of 1890)" .], the wages of an employed person shall be paid to him without deductions of any kind except those authorised by or under this Act. |
What does 'Section 13 in The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956' say about custody? | .-The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules providing for-the manner in which application for registration may be made under this Act, the particulars to be contained therein, the procedure for the grant of such registration, the circumstances in which registration may be refused a... |
What does 'Section 31 in The Special Marriage Act, 1954' say about divorce? | .[Every petition under Chapter V or Chapter VI shall be presented to the district Court within the local limits of whose original civil jurisdiction
the respondent, at the time of the presentation of the petition, resides; or
the parties to the marriage last resided together; or |
What does 'Section 25 in The SpecialMarriageAct, 1954' say about voidable marriage? | .Any marriage solemnized under this Act shall be voidable and may be annulled by a decree of nullity ifthe marriage has not been consummated owing to the wilful refusal of the respondent to consummate the marriage; orthe respondent was at the time of the marriage pregnant by some person other than the petitioner; or |
What does 'Section 53 in The Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920' say about marriage? | .Any transfer of property not being a transfer made before and in consideration of marriage or made in favour of a purchaser or incumbrancer in good faith and for valuable consideration shall, if the transferor is adjudged insolvent [on a petition presented]
within two years after the date of the transfer, be voidab... |
What does 'Section 44 in The Special Marriage Act, 1954' say about Bigamy? | .Every person whose marriage is solemnized under this Act and who, during the lifetime of his or her wife or husband, contracts any other marriage shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 494 and section 495 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), for the offence of marrying again during the lifetime of a h... |
What does 'Section 2 in The Mental Health Act, 1987' say about marriage? | .In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,cost of maintenance, in relation to a mentally ill person admitted in a psychiatric hospital or psychiatric nursing home, shall mean the cost of such items as the State Government may, by general or special order, specify in this behalf;District Court means, in any ar... |
What does 'Section 40 in The Special Marriage Act, 1954' say about Judicial separation,? | .Subject to the other provisions contained in this Act, and to such rules as the High Court may make in this behalf, all proceedings under this Act shall be regulated, as far as may be, by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908).[40-A. Power to transfer petitions in certain cases[Sections, 40-A, 40-B and 40-C ins... |
What does 'Section 16 in The SpecialMarriageAct, 1954' say about marriage? | .Upon receipt of an application signed by both the parties to the marriage for the registration of their marriage under this Chapter, the Marriage Officer shall give public notice thereof in such manner as may be prescribed and after allowing a period of thirty days for objections and after hearing any objection receiv... |
What does 'Section 5 in The SpecialMarriageAct, 1954' say about marriage? | .When a marriage is intended to be solemnized under this Act, the parties to the marriage shall give notice thereof in writing in the Form specified in the Second Schedule to the Marriage Officer of the district in which at least one of the parties to the marriage has resided for a period of not less than thirty days i... |
What does 'Section 22 in The SpecialMarriageAct, 1954' say about marriage? | .When either the husband or the wife has, without reasonable excuse, withdrawn from the society of the other, the aggrieved party may apply by petition to the district Court for restitution of conjugal rights, and the Court, on being satisfied of the truth of the statements made in such petition, and that there is no l... |
What does 'Section 22 in The Special Marriage Act, 1954' say about Restitution of conjugal rights? | .When either the husband or the wife has, without reasonable excuse, withdrawn from the society of the other, the aggrieved party may apply by petition to the district Court for restitution of conjugal rights, and the Court, on being satisfied of the truth of the statements made in such petition, and that there is no l... |
What does 'Section 30 in The Special Marriage Act, 1954' say about divorce? | .Where a marriage has been dissolved by a decree of divorce, and either there is no right of appeal against the decree or if there is such a right of appeal, the time for appealing has expired without an appeal having been presented or an appeal has been presented but has been dismissed, [* * * *]
[The words "and on... |
What does 'Section 36 in The Special Marriage Act, 1954' say about Alimony? | .Where in any proceeding under Chapter V or Chapter VI it appears to the district Court that the wife has no independent income sufficient for her support and the necessary expenses of the proceeding, it may, on the application of the wife, order the husband to pay to her the expenses of the proceeding, and weekly or m... |
What does 'Section 36 in The SpecialMarriageAct, 1954' say about marriage? | .Where in any proceeding under Chapter V or Chapter VI it appears to the district Court that the wife has no independent income sufficient for her support and the necessary expenses of the proceeding, it may, on the application of the wife, order the husband to pay to her the expenses of the proceeding, and weekly or m... |
What does 'Lawyers Beyond Borders (Lbb) India vs Union Of India on 25 August, 2020' say about sexual issues? | · Asylum Cases · Birth Certificate
· Compensation · Contract Problems
· Domestic Help · Dubious Job |
What does 'K G vs State Of Delhi & Anr. on 16 November, 2017' say about guardianship? | " It is apparent that the petitioner maliciously deceived
and hoodwinked the respondent by wrongfully retaining their
daughter at New Delhi. The petitioner disappeared on |
What does 'Sarabjit Singh vs Charanjit Kaur on 30 May, 1996' say about (Hindu marital? | " .. the words 'wife' and 'husband' used in sub-section ofof the Act would include within their scope a woman and a man professing thefaith who have gone through a ceremony of marriage which would, in law, have conferred the status of a wife or husband oh them but for the provisions of S; 11 read with Cls. (i), (iv) an... |
What does 'Sreerangaraju.R vs Usha on 28 December, 2022' say about Live-in relationships? | " 3The Distinction between thenotwithstanding the fact that there areeven if they are not sharing a shared |
What does 'M vs M S on 23 April, 2019' say about Restitution of conjugal rights? | " Keeping the above principles in view, we are of the opinionthat the intention of the legislature while amending the Act byAct, 44 of 1964 was that the non-resumption of cohabitation or |
What does 'Sh. Bhag Singh vs Sh. Rafiq on 27 May, 2017' say about misuse of legal provisions? | " mere denial of ownership is no denial at all. It has to be something
more. The object of the requirement contained in clause (e ) that the
petitioner should be the owner of the premises is not to provide an |
What does 'D.Velusamy vs D.Patchaiammal on 21 October, 2010' say about marriage? | "..the object is to prevent vagrancy and destitution. It
clothing and shelter to the deserted wife. When an
attempt is made by the husband to negative the claim of |
What does 'Santosh Kumari vs Mohan Lal on 21 May, 1980' say about Judicial separation,? | "(1A). Either party to a marriage, whether solemnized before or after the commencement of this Act, may also present a petition for the dissolution of the marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground--(i) that there has been no resumption as between the parties to the marriage for a period of two years or upwards afte... |
What does 'Sujata Gandhi vs S.B. Gandhi on 12 June, 2020' say about Live-in relationships? | "(s) "shared household" means a household where the person aggrievedeither singly or along with the respondent and includes such a household whether owned or tenanted either jointly by the aggrieved person and the respondent, or owned or tenanted by either of them in respect of which either the aggrieved person or the ... |
What does 'Santhini vs Vijaya Venketesh on 9 October, 2017' say about marriage? | “1To what extent the confidence and confidentiality will
be safeguarded and protected in video conferencing,
particularly when efforts are taken by the counsellors, |
What does 'Sasikumar vs Bindu.S on 27 March, 2009' say about Judicial separation,? | "21-A. Power to transfer petitions in certain cases:--(a) a petition under this Act has been presented to adistrict Court having jurisdiction by a party to a marriage |
What does 'Sheela George vs V.M.Alexander on 2 June, 2025' say about Alimony? | "37.Power to order permanent alimony.- Where a
of the parties, it thinks reasonable; and for that
A reading of Section 37 makes it clear that a divorced |
What does 'Jasmeet Kaur vs Navtej Singh on 20 February, 2018' say about child abduction? | “3We must remind ourselves of the settled legalposition that the concept of forum convenience has noplace in wardship jurisdiction. Further, the efficacy |
What does '"Apart From The Conflicting Opinions vs Uma Devi (Supra). The Judgment Begins on 23 May, 2014' say about Repression,? | "Apart From The Conflicting Opinions vs Uma Devi (Supra). The Judgment Begins on 23 May, 2014
In a case where a person secures 33 marks in educational qualification but entitled for 10 bonus marks shall have 33.1 (23.1 + 10) merit marks. This fellow will march over a person having 47% marks as the merit marks of... |
What does 'Jayammal vs V.Kumar on 2 July, 2008' say about Void marriage? | "I am unable to agree with the contention of learned counsel for the appellants. There is a distinction between proof of
or by circumstantial evidence, one of the circumstances being long cohabitation and living together. But a
which is questioned on the ground of being subsequent to and during the subsistence of... |
What does 'Ranganatham vs Shyamala on 5 November, 1988' say about divorce? | "It is not competent to the Court dismissing a husband's petition for dissolution of marriage, to award maintenance to the wife, u/
. Though the wife might have filed an application for
of the Act, still in the absence of a decree for dissolution or judicial separation, no order for maintenance can be made under ... |
What does 'Ranganatham vs Shyamala on 5 November, 1988' say about Judicial separation,? | "It is not competent to the Court dismissing a husband's petition for dissolution of marriage, to award maintenance to the wife, u/. Though the wife might have filed an application for divorce orof the Act, still in the absence of a decree for dissolution or |
What does 'J.Gnanakumar vs Joy Kanmani on 20 August, 2013' say about second marriage? | "It is significant to note that in Ex.A-16, the date of theis not mentioned. As the earliest document coming into existence after, one would have expected Meenakshisundaram to have |
What does 'R vs J on 9 April, 2018' say about Judicial separation,? | „J‟ and „R‟ got married on 03rd July, 1978 and two childrenwere born out of their wedlock, namely a daughter, Pooja on 29thOctober, 1980 and a son, Raghav on 04th September, 198On 29th |
What does 'Bhagwan Das vs The State & Ors. on 5 August, 2019' say about guardianship? | "Jurisdiction- Subject to the other provisions of this
Court having jurisdiction to entertain application.--
the person of the minor, it shall be made to the District |
What does 'A. Yousuf Rawther vs Sowramma on 24 June, 1970' say about divorce? | "Marriage under Islam is but a civil contract, and not a sacrament, in the sense that those who are once joined in wed-lock can never be separated. It may be controlled, and under certain circumstances, dissolved by the will of the parties concerned. Public declaration is no doubt necessary, but it is not a condition o... |
What does 'A. Thangammal vs State Rep By on 6 February, 2008' say about Repression,? | "Power of Court to pass sentence of detention in Borstal School -
Where it appears to a Court having jurisdiction under this Act that
an adolescent offender should, by reason of his criminal habits or tendencies, |
What does 'Section 27 in The SpecialMarriageAct, 1954' say about marriage? | "section 27" ANDD "limitation act" NOTT "adverse possession"
[Section 27 renumbered as sub-Section thereof by Act 29 of 1970, Section 3 (w.e.f. 12.8.1970).]
Subject to the provisions of this Act and to the rules made thereunder, a petition for divorce may be presented to the district Court either by the husband o... |
What does 'Section 164 in The Income Tax Act, 1961' say about Maintenance? | "section 27" ANDD "limitation act" NOTT "adverse possession"
16[ Charge of tax where share of beneficiaries unknown.
[Substituted by Act 19 of 1970, Section 21, for Section 164 (w.e.f. 1.4.1971).] |
What does 'N K Tewari vs M/O Home Affairs on 18 May, 2016' say about Bigamy? | "That the said Shri N.K. Tiwari, while functioning as Assistant in
the Frontier Hqrs SSB Lucknow has married Smt. Seema, D/o
lat Shri Murlidhar resident of 138/136 at Fatehganj on 05.5.08 |
What does 'Prashant Ojha vs Shalu Ojha on 6 April, 2015' say about Domestic violence? | "The case as set out in appeal in brief, is that the
parties had married to each other on 20.04.2007 in Delhi.
They had stayed in hotel/Executive Farms for few days as |
What does 'Darshan Gupta vs Radhika Gupta on 1 July, 2013' say about divorce? | “The Hon’ble Supreme Court, by the order dated 19.09.2011 directed us
to live happily for a period of six months. In pursuance to the
directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, my husband taken me into his |
What does 'Saraswathy vs Babu on 25 November, 2013' say about Domestic violence? | “The primary question that arises for consideration is whether
acts committed prior to the coming into force of the
The High Court after taking into consideration the stand taken by the |
What does 'Binu vs State Of Kerala on 17 July, 2002' say about Repression,? | "The question is whether protection for the individual would not be gained at a disproportionate loss of protection for society. On the one side is the social need that crime shall be
. On the other, the social need that law shall not be flouted by the insolence of office. There are dangers in any choice. The rule o... |
What does 'Saly Joseph vs Baby Thomas on 16 November, 1998' say about (Hindu marital? | "The question of capacity to marry and the impediments in the way of marriage would have to be resolved by referring to their personal law. That for the purpose of deciding the validity of the marriage, would be the law of the Roman Catholic Church, namely the Canon Law of that Church".The marriage was not annulled, as... |
What does 'Kaka vs Hassan Bano And Anr. on 21 October, 1997' say about divorce? | "The statements in the text books viz. Mulla's Mohammedan Law (18th edition); Tyabji's Muslim Law (4th edition) are inadequate to establish the proposition that the Muslim husband is not under an obligation to provide for the maintenance of his
deals with cases in which, a person who is possessed to sufficient means... |
What does 'Darshan Kumar vs Pushap Lata on 17 May, 2011' say about (Hindu marital? | "We have thus, in this light, no hesitation in coming to the viewthat juncture, while passing the decree, if undoubtedly has thepower to grant permanent alimony or maintenance, if that |
What does 'P.Shanthi Kiran vs State Of Ap on 17 June, 2020' say about Void marriage? | "Wife" for the purposes of Chapter-IX means a legally wedded
legally wedded wife who was neglected by her husband. The
only exception is a divorced wife as per explanation (b) of |
What does 'XXX And Ors vs ABC And Anr on 2 March, 2016' say about jointly owned assets? | "XXX" ]
Aged 33 years, Occ.: Business, ]
R/at 4-1-316, Residency Road, ] |
What does 'Dy. Supdt. Of Police Cbi-Bsc 11 New Delhi vs R. Sitraman And Ors on 1 November, 2018' say about International custody issues? | ( Constituted under the Special Court [Trial of Offences Relating to
(Presided Over By : Hon'ble Dr. Justice Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi)
Central Bureau of Investigation, ] |
What does the article 'Imratlal v State of M.P. on 27 January 1986 - Judgement' say about marriage law? | (1.) The appellant, aggrieved by his conviction under S.376, Penal Code, recorded by the Sessions Judge, Shivpuri, in Session Trial No. 54 of 1979, judgment dated 12-11-1979, has preferred this appeal. The appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years only.(2.) Brief facts are that in vi... |
What does 'Yusuf Khan vs State Of M.P. on 4 October, 2018' say about rape? | (16) The prosecutrix (PW3) has stated that the complainantMullo Bai (PW2) and the prosecutrix (PW3) were going to JorasiTemple for offering prayer and they boarded a bus from Dabra |
What does 'Kiran Kumar vs Ravinder Kumar on 7 March, 2020' say about guardianship? | (2.5) As per the terms and conditions of the agreement, the plaintiffs
were required to obtain necessary permission for sale of execution
Judge. Plaintiffs have requested time and again to defendants to |
What does 'Bal Kishan vs Urmila on 30 August, 2001' say about Judicial separation,? | (2), a Division Bench of Gujaral High Court has observed that there must be some facts or circumstances occurring after the decree foration or restitution of conjugal rights showing that the petitioner was the defaulting parly and a wrong doer who was taking advantage of his own wrong. In that case, the husband against... |
What does 'Prof.M.K.Surappa vs The Joint Secretary' say about sexual issues? | (2016) 12 SCC 451 wherein a senior Government Officer was proceeded
non-supply of copy of the inquiry report based on the complaint was raised,
the Union Government claimed privilege under Sections 123 and 124 of the |
What does 'Inderjit Kaur vs Rajinder Singh on 16 April, 1980' say about Judicial separation,? | (23) Thirdly, and in any event, since the compromise resulted in a reconciliation, the right course for the court was to dismiss the petition and not to grant a decree. Ireach this conclusion as follows-ation or divorce is, pending, the parties become reconciled and decide to resume cohabitation. What order should the ... |
What does 'Inderjit Kaur vs Rajinder Singh on 16 April, 1980' say about divorce? | (29) In Halsbury's Laws of England (3rd edn.) volume' 12 page 284 paragraph 554 it is stated :
'AT any time after the commencement of proceedings for rcsutution of conjugal rights, the respondent may apply for an order to stay the proceedings on the ground that he is willing to resume or return to cohabitation. Such... |
What does 'Bachan Singh Etc. Etc vs State Of Punjab Etc. Etc on 16 August, 1982' say about Legal implications of adultery? | (A) Death Penalty, whether constitutionally valid ?-
Right to live, whether the provisions of section 302, Penal
between "Public order" and "Law and Order"-Whether section |
What does 'Shri Inder Raj vs Nisha on 5 April, 2021' say about Share in matrimonial? | (A) Whether suit for possession can be instituted against a4The first aspect which arises for consideration iswhether in view of the right of Residence given to the defendant |
What does 'Santosh Paswan Son Of Ramdin Paswan vs The State Of Jharkhand on 12 February, 2024' say about inter faith marriage? | (Against the judgment of conviction dated 24.06.2016 and order ofsentence dated 27.06.2016, passed by Additional Sessions Judge-IV,Santosh Paswan son of Ramdin Paswan, resident of Sector-II |
What does 'Baby @ Rohini (Deceased) vs Kamalam Kumerasan on 5 August, 2015' say about Legal implications of adultery? | (Appellants 5 to 7 brought on record as LRs of the deceased
1st appellant vide order of the Court dated 29.01.2015
of the C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 22.02.2013 made in O.S.No.269 of 2004 on the file of the Vth Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore. |
What does 'Smt. Babita @ Gyatri vs Modprasad @ Pintu And Others on 12 September, 2017' say about Streedhan rights? | (Arising out of judgment/order dated 28.04.2016 passed in Misc. Civil
Suit No.08/2015 of the learned Family Court, Mahasamund)
· Smt. Babita @ Gyatri, W/o Modprasad @ Pintu Patel, Aged About |
What does 'Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi vs Vidhi Rawal on 19 May, 2025' say about jointly owned assets? | (arising out of Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 9493 of 2024)
Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi … Appellant
Vidhi Rawal … Respondent |
What does 'Lahari Sakhamuri vs Sobhan Kodali on 15 March, 2019' say about International custody issues? | (Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 1589215893 of 2018)
LAHARI SAKHAMURI …..Appellant(s)
SOBHAN KODALI …..Respondent(s) |
What does 'Lahari Sakhamuri vs Sobhan Kodali on 15 March, 2019' say about Right to residence marital? | (Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 1589215893 of 2018)LAHARI SAKHAMURI …..Appellant(s)SOBHAN KODALI …..Respondent(s) |
What does 'Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan vs The State Of Maharashtra on 20 March, 2018' say about misuse of legal provisions? | (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.)No.5661 of 2017)
DR. SUBHASH KASHINATH MAHAJAN …Appellant
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. …Respondents |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.