Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,92 +1,182 @@
|
|
| 1 |
# Measuring the Intensive Margin of Work: Task-Level Labor Input Data
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-
This
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
-
For each
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
-
* **Task flow (μ)**:
|
| 8 |
-
* **Task share (π)**:
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
-
Under a homogeneous task-duration assumption, task shares can be interpreted as time allocations across tasks within occupations.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
---
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
## Citation
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-
Bouquet, Pierre and Sheffi, Yossi (2026).
|
| 21 |
-
*Measuring the Intensive Margin of Work: Task Shares and Concentration.*
|
| 22 |
-
MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics Research Paper No. 2026/004.
|
| 23 |
-
[SSRN](https://ssrn.com/abstract=6174538) | [DOI](http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6174538)
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
---
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-
## Data
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
-
Expected annual number of occurrences of a task within an occupation
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-
*
|
| 37 |
-
|
| 38 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
---
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-
##
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-
* Task definitions
|
| 48 |
-
* Occupation coverage
|
| 49 |
-
* Survey responses
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
---
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
-
##
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
-
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
-
``
|
| 62 |
-
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
```
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
-
``
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 71 |
```
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
---
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
-
##
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
-
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
---
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
## License
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
# Measuring the Intensive Margin of Work: Task-Level Labor Input Data
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
+
This dataset provides **task-level measures of labor input within occupations**, constructed from O*NET task frequency data.
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
+
For each occupation–task pair, we estimate:
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
+
* **Task flow (μ)**: expected number of times a task is performed annually per worker within an occupation
|
| 8 |
+
* **Task share (π)**: proportion of total labor input allocated to the task
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
+
Under a homogeneous task-duration assumption, task shares can be interpreted as **time allocations across tasks within occupations**.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
+
Unlike standard O*NET-derived measures, this dataset provides **statistically specified estimators of task-level labor input**, including uncertainty (variance) for incumbent-based estimates.
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
These measures enable:
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
* AI exposure measurement
|
| 17 |
+
* workforce decomposition
|
| 18 |
+
* automation targeting
|
| 19 |
+
* task-level economic analysis
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
---
|
| 22 |
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
+
## Measurement Units
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
* **Task flow (μ)**
|
| 27 |
+
Expected annual number of task occurrences **per worker within an occupation**
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
* **Task share (π)**
|
| 30 |
+
Fraction of total labor input allocated to a task within an occupation
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
Interpretable as a time share under the assumption of homogeneous task duration.
|
| 33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
---
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
+
## Data Files
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
+
Data is organized by:
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
+
* O*NET version
|
| 42 |
+
* estimate type (mean vs full)
|
| 43 |
+
* measure (flow vs share)
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
+
### Mean estimates (point estimates only)
|
|
|
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
+
* Task flow (μ):
|
| 48 |
+
`task_labor_input_mean_estimates/{ONET_VERSION}/ONET_{ONET_VERSION}_weight_mode_STANDARD_task_flow_mean_estimates.csv`
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
* Task labor input share (π):
|
| 51 |
+
`task_labor_input_mean_estimates/{ONET_VERSION}/ONET_{ONET_VERSION}_weight_mode_STANDARD_task_labor_input_mean_estimates.csv`
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
### Full estimates (mean + variance)
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
* Task flow (μ):
|
| 56 |
+
`task_labor_input_full_estimates/{ONET_VERSION}/ONET_{ONET_VERSION}_weight_mode_STANDARD_task_flow_full_estimates.csv`
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
* Task labor input share (π):
|
| 59 |
+
`task_labor_input_full_estimates/{ONET_VERSION}/ONET_{ONET_VERSION}_weight_mode_STANDARD_task_labor_input_full_estimates.csv`
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
---
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
+
## Mean vs Full Estimates
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
* **Mean estimates**
|
| 66 |
+
Combine incumbent and analyst task ratings and report **point estimates only**.
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
* **Full estimates**
|
| 69 |
+
Rely exclusively on **incumbent survey data**, which provides frequency distributions with sampling uncertainty.
|
| 70 |
+
This enables construction of **fully specified estimators**, including:
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
+
* mean (μ or π)
|
| 73 |
+
* variance (Var)
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
Full estimates therefore support **statistical inference and uncertainty quantification**, while mean estimates provide broader coverage.
|
| 76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
---
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
+
## Dataset Structure
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
+
Each dataset is defined at the **occupation–task level**, with one row per `(onetsoc_code, task_id)` pair.
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
+
### Columns
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
+
**Mean estimates:**
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
+
* `onetsoc_code` — O*NET occupation code
|
| 89 |
+
* `task_id` — O*NET task identifier
|
| 90 |
+
* `mean` — Estimated value (μ or π)
|
|
|
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
+
**Full estimates:**
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
+
* `onetsoc_code` — O*NET occupation code
|
| 95 |
+
* `task_id` — O*NET task identifier
|
| 96 |
+
* `mean` — Estimated value (μ or π)
|
| 97 |
+
* `variance` — Estimated variance of the estimator
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
---
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
## Data Source: O*NET
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
O*NET task frequency data is based on:
|
| 105 |
+
|
| 106 |
+
* **Incumbents (survey respondents)**
|
| 107 |
+
Provide frequency distributions with associated standard errors
|
| 108 |
+
|
| 109 |
+
* **Analysts (occupation experts)**
|
| 110 |
+
Provide point estimates without measures of dispersion
|
| 111 |
+
|
| 112 |
+
This dataset distinguishes between:
|
| 113 |
+
|
| 114 |
+
* combined estimates (mean only)
|
| 115 |
+
* incumbent-based estimates (mean + variance)
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
---
|
| 118 |
+
|
| 119 |
+
## Coverage
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
The dataset includes multiple O*NET releases (from version 20.1 onward).
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
Each version may differ due to:
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
* updates to task definitions
|
| 126 |
+
* changes in occupation coverage
|
| 127 |
+
* new survey responses
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
⚠️ **Version comparability note**
|
| 130 |
+
O*NET releases are not strictly comparable over time. Differences across versions may reflect survey and taxonomy updates rather than true economic changes.
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
---
|
| 133 |
+
|
| 134 |
+
## Quick Start
|
| 135 |
+
|
| 136 |
+
```python
|
| 137 |
+
import pandas as pd
|
| 138 |
+
|
| 139 |
+
|
| 140 |
+
job_task_input_mean_estimates = pd.read_csv(
|
| 141 |
+
"https://huggingface.co/datasets/MIT-WAL/job_task_input_share/resolve/main/task_labor_input_mean_estimates/30_2/ONET_30_2_weight_mode_STANDARD_task_labor_input_mean_estimates.csv"
|
| 142 |
+
)
|
| 143 |
```
|
| 144 |
|
| 145 |
---
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 |
+
## Example Applications
|
| 148 |
|
| 149 |
+
* AI exposure measurement at the task level
|
| 150 |
+
* Workforce decomposition into task bundles
|
| 151 |
+
* Construction of task-based production functions
|
| 152 |
|
| 153 |
+
---
|
| 154 |
+
|
| 155 |
+
## Limitations
|
| 156 |
+
|
| 157 |
+
* Task durations are assumed homogeneous when constructing task shares
|
| 158 |
+
* Task flows rely on discretized frequency bins (midpoint approximation)
|
| 159 |
+
* Full estimates are limited to incumbent-based tasks
|
| 160 |
+
* Measurement error arises from survey sampling and bin approximation
|
| 161 |
+
* Cross-version comparisons should be interpreted with caution
|
| 162 |
|
| 163 |
+
---
|
| 164 |
+
|
| 165 |
+
## Citation
|
| 166 |
+
|
| 167 |
+
If you use this dataset, please cite:
|
| 168 |
+
|
| 169 |
+
Bouquet, Pierre and Sheffi, Yossi (2026).
|
| 170 |
+
*Measuring the Intensive Margin of Work: Task Shares and Concentration.*
|
| 171 |
+
MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics Research Paper No. 2026/004.
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 |
+
SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6174538
|
| 174 |
+
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6174538
|
| 175 |
|
| 176 |
---
|
| 177 |
|
| 178 |
## License
|
| 179 |
|
| 180 |
+
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
| 181 |
+
(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
|
| 182 |
+
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
|