File size: 2,595 Bytes
4b2c6cb 5e5152c 4b2c6cb 422a837 4b2c6cb 5e5152c 422a837 4b2c6cb 422a837 4b2c6cb 422a837 4b2c6cb 422a837 4b2c6cb 422a837 4b2c6cb 422a837 4b2c6cb 422a837 4b2c6cb 422a837 5e5152c 422a837 5e5152c 422a837 4b2c6cb 422a837 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 | ---
license: apache-2.0
task_categories:
- question-answering
- text-generation
language:
- en
tags:
- cybersecurity
- security
- code-analysis
- vulnerability-analysis
- benchmark
- evaluation
pretty_name: FBE and VAB security analysis benchmarks
size_categories:
- n<1K
configs:
- config_name: fbe
data_files: fbe.jsonl
- config_name: vab
data_files: vab.jsonl
---
# FBE and VAB
Two small benchmarks for security code analysis. Both grade without an LLM judge, so runs are cheap
and repeatable.
## FBE (find-the-bug)
14 code snippets, each with one planted vulnerability. Ask the model to analyze the code, then check
whether it actually found the flaw.
Grading uses concept groups: the answer has to contain at least one synonym from every required group.
Four numbers come out:
* found, did it identify the real vulnerability (this is the one that matters)
* capability, did it say what the attacker gains
* fix, did it propose a remediation at a sensible layer
* distracted, did it wander onto something irrelevant (lower is better)
Bug classes: missing object-level authorization on a sibling route, mass assignment of a role,
second-order SSRF through a stored URL, path traversal where validation runs before decoding,
edit-after-approval, a single-use token that is never consumed, a check-then-act race on inventory,
identity taken from a client-supplied header, a worker trusting mutable queue fields, negative-amount
transfer, authorization that fails open, non-constant-time secret comparison, a support route that
bypasses the refund workflow, and a delete route that authenticates but doesn't authorize.
Row format:
```json
{"id": "...", "vuln": "...", "domain": "...", "code": "...",
"must_hit": [["synonym", "..."]], "capability": [[...]], "fix": [[...]], "distractors": [[...]]}
```
## VAB (multiple choice)
20 MCQ items over code and scenarios: broken invariant, root cause, capability (knowledge, influence,
access, authority, execution), chain validity, missing check, confidence, negative space, state
sequence. For chain validity the options are fixed: A proven, B probable, C speculative, D blocked.
Worth knowing before you use it: VAB rewards short forced-choice answers. A model tuned to write
long-form analysis can drop on VAB while being unchanged or better at actually finding bugs. We measured
exactly that. Treat FBE as the real signal and VAB as a secondary one.
## Reference numbers
Qwythos / Qwen3.5-9B 4-bit base: FBE found 79%, FBE full credit 43%, VAB 75%.
## Use
Authorized security evaluation and research. All snippets are generic.
|