Closed-world assumption

Instruction: All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Closed-world assumption.
All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.
Complete predicates for this item: assigned_to_trial, completed_training, has_clearance, may_enter_lab, needs_supervisor_review.

Predicate glossary:
- assigned_to_trial: is assigned to the clinical trial
- completed_training: has completed safety training
- has_clearance: has security clearance
- may_enter_lab: may enter Lab A
- needs_supervisor_review: needs supervisor review

Positive facts:
- Farid has completed safety training.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: assigned_to_trial::Farid.
Target statement: Farid is assigned to the clinical trial.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Open-world assumption

Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_release_approval: has release approval
- has_supplier_note: has a supplier note
- may_ship: may ship to customers
- needs_engineer_review: needs engineer review
- passed_visual_check: passed the visual check

Positive facts:
- Part A passed the visual check.

Negative facts:
- Part E does not has a supplier note.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_supplier_note::Part E.
Target statement: Part E has a supplier note.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Locally closed-world assumption

Instruction: Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Locally closed-world assumption.
Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: has_clearance, may_enter_lab.

Predicate glossary:
- assigned_to_trial: is assigned to the clinical trial
- completed_training: has completed safety training
- has_clearance: has security clearance
- may_enter_lab: may enter Lab A
- needs_supervisor_review: needs supervisor review

Positive facts:
- Ben is assigned to the clinical trial.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If a staff member is assigned to the clinical trial, then that staff member needs supervisor review.

Target atom: needs_supervisor_review::Ben.
Target statement: Ben needs supervisor review.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Closed-world assumption

Instruction: All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.

Service E has deployment approval.
Service E passed unit tests.

has_deployment_approval::Service E
passed_unit_tests::Service E

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Closed-world assumption.
All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.
Complete predicates for this item: has_deployment_approval, has_incident_note, may_deploy, needs_sre_review, passed_unit_tests.

Predicate glossary:
- has_deployment_approval: has deployment approval
- has_incident_note: has an incident note
- may_deploy: may deploy to production
- needs_sre_review: needs SRE review
- passed_unit_tests: passed unit tests

Positive facts:
- Service E has deployment approval.
- Service E passed unit tests.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_incident_note::Service D.
Target statement: Service D has an incident note.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Open-world assumption

Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_risk_note: has a risk note
- has_vendor_approval: has vendor approval
- may_receive_purchase_order: may receive a purchase order
- needs_procurement_review: needs procurement review
- submitted_tax_form: submitted a tax form

Positive facts:
- Vendor E submitted a tax form.

Negative facts:
- Vendor C does not has vendor approval.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_vendor_approval::Vendor C.
Target statement: Vendor C has vendor approval.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Closed-world assumption

Instruction: All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Closed-world assumption.
All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.
Complete predicates for this item: has_risk_note, has_vendor_approval, may_receive_purchase_order, needs_procurement_review, submitted_tax_form.

Predicate glossary:
- has_risk_note: has a risk note
- has_vendor_approval: has vendor approval
- may_receive_purchase_order: may receive a purchase order
- needs_procurement_review: needs procurement review
- submitted_tax_form: submitted a tax form

Positive facts:
- Vendor C submitted a tax form.

Negative facts:
- Vendor A does not has vendor approval.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_vendor_approval::Vendor A.
Target statement: Vendor A has vendor approval.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Locally closed-world assumption

Instruction: Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Locally closed-world assumption.
Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: has_deployment_approval.

Predicate glossary:
- has_deployment_approval: has deployment approval
- has_incident_note: has an incident note
- may_deploy: may deploy to production
- needs_sre_review: needs SRE review
- passed_unit_tests: passed unit tests

Positive facts:
- Service A passed unit tests.

Negative facts:
- Service E does not has deployment approval.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_deployment_approval::Service E.
Target statement: Service E has deployment approval.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Instruction: Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Locally closed-world assumption.
Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: has_advising_clearance.

Predicate glossary:
- has_advising_clearance: has advising clearance
- has_external_scholarship: has an external scholarship
- may_register: may register for the seminar
- needs_manual_audit: needs a manual audit
- passed_exam: passed the qualifying exam

Positive facts:
- Theo passed the qualifying exam.

Negative facts:
- Omar does not has advising clearance.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_advising_clearance::Omar.
Target statement: Omar has advising clearance.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Closed-world assumption

Instruction: All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Closed-world assumption.
All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.
Complete predicates for this item: has_active_membership, has_borrowing_clearance, has_special_request, may_borrow_archive_item, needs_librarian_review.

Predicate glossary:
- has_active_membership: has an active membership
- has_borrowing_clearance: has borrowing clearance
- has_special_request: has a special request
- may_borrow_archive_item: may borrow an archive item
- needs_librarian_review: needs librarian review

Positive facts:
- Reader C has an active membership.

Negative facts:
- Reader A does not has borrowing clearance.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_borrowing_clearance::Reader A.
Target statement: Reader A has borrowing clearance.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Open-world assumption

Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_advising_clearance: has advising clearance
- has_external_scholarship: has an external scholarship
- may_register: may register for the seminar
- needs_manual_audit: needs a manual audit
- passed_exam: passed the qualifying exam

Positive facts:
- Noah passed the qualifying exam.

Negative facts:
- Theo does not has an external scholarship.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_external_scholarship::Theo.
Target statement: Theo has an external scholarship.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Closed-world assumption

Instruction: All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.

Lena has advising clearance.
Lena passed the qualifying exam.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Closed-world assumption.
All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.
Complete predicates for this item: has_advising_clearance, has_external_scholarship, may_register, needs_manual_audit, passed_exam.

Predicate glossary:
- has_advising_clearance: has advising clearance
- has_external_scholarship: has an external scholarship
- may_register: may register for the seminar
- needs_manual_audit: needs a manual audit
- passed_exam: passed the qualifying exam

Positive facts:
- Lena has advising clearance.
- Lena passed the qualifying exam.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_external_scholarship::Noah.
Target statement: Noah has an external scholarship.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Locally closed-world assumption

Instruction: Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.

Is it true that Ben is assigned to the clinical trial?

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Locally closed-world assumption.
Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: has_clearance, may_enter_lab.

Predicate glossary:
- assigned_to_trial: is assigned to the clinical trial
- completed_training: has completed safety training
- has_clearance: has security clearance
- may_enter_lab: may enter Lab A
- needs_supervisor_review: needs supervisor review

Positive facts:
- Ben has completed safety training.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: assigned_to_trial::Ben.
Target statement: Ben is assigned to the clinical trial.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Open-world assumption

Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Account 48 has compliance clearance.
Account 48 passed KYC checks.

has_compliance_clearance::Account 48
passed_kyc::Account 48

Is it true that Account 35 has a manual exception?

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_compliance_clearance: has compliance clearance
- has_manual_exception: has a manual exception
- may_receive_wire: may receive a wire transfer
- needs_compliance_review: needs compliance review
- passed_kyc: passed KYC checks

Positive facts:
- Account 48 has compliance clearance.
- Account 48 passed KYC checks.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_manual_exception::Account 35.
Target statement: Account 35 has a manual exception.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Reader A has an active membership.
Reader A has borrowing clearance.

has_active_membership::Reader A
has_borrowing_clearance::Reader A

Is it true that Reader F has a special request?

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_active_membership: has an active membership
- has_borrowing_clearance: has borrowing clearance
- has_special_request: has a special request
- may_borrow_archive_item: may borrow an archive item
- needs_librarian_review: needs librarian review

Positive facts:
- Reader A has an active membership.
- Reader A has borrowing clearance.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_special_request::Reader F.
Target statement: Reader F has a special request.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Closed-world assumption

Instruction: All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.

Ava is assigned to the clinical trial.
Farid has completed safety training.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Closed-world assumption.
All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.
Complete predicates for this item: assigned_to_trial, completed_training, has_clearance, may_enter_lab, needs_supervisor_review.

Predicate glossary:
- assigned_to_trial: is assigned to the clinical trial
- completed_training: has completed safety training
- has_clearance: has security clearance
- may_enter_lab: may enter Lab A
- needs_supervisor_review: needs supervisor review

Positive facts:
- Ava is assigned to the clinical trial.
- Farid has completed safety training.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_clearance::Farid.
Target statement: Farid has security clearance.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Open-world assumption

Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Is it true that Omar has advising clearance?

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_advising_clearance: has advising clearance
- has_external_scholarship: has an external scholarship
- may_register: may register for the seminar
- needs_manual_audit: needs a manual audit
- passed_exam: passed the qualifying exam

Positive facts:
- Omar passed the qualifying exam.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If a student passed the qualifying exam and has advising clearance, then that student may register for the seminar.

Target atom: may_register::Omar.
Target statement: Omar may register for the seminar.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Closed-world assumption

Instruction: All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Closed-world assumption.
All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.
Complete predicates for this item: has_risk_note, has_vendor_approval, may_receive_purchase_order, needs_procurement_review, submitted_tax_form.

Predicate glossary:
- has_risk_note: has a risk note
- has_vendor_approval: has vendor approval
- may_receive_purchase_order: may receive a purchase order
- needs_procurement_review: needs procurement review
- submitted_tax_form: submitted a tax form

Positive facts:
- Vendor B submitted a tax form.

Negative facts:
- Vendor F does not has a risk note.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_risk_note::Vendor F.
Target statement: Vendor F has a risk note.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Open-world assumption

Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Rover 1 has shift clearance.
Rover 1 passed diagnostics.

has_shift_clearance::Rover 1
passed_diagnostics::Rover 1

passed_diagnostics::Rover 1
has_shift_clearance::Rover 1

has_shift_clearance::Rover 1
may_start_shift::Rover 1
passed_diagnostics::Rover 1

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_field_note: has a field note
- has_shift_clearance: has shift clearance
- may_start_shift: may start its shift
- needs_operator_review: needs operator review
- passed_diagnostics: passed diagnostics

Positive facts:
- Rover 1 has shift clearance.
- Rover 1 passed diagnostics.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If a robot passed diagnostics and has shift clearance, then that robot may start its shift.

Target atom: may_start_shift::Rover 1.
Target statement: Rover 1 may start its shift.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_release_approval: has release approval
- has_supplier_note: has a supplier note
- may_ship: may ship to customers
- needs_engineer_review: needs engineer review
- passed_visual_check: passed the visual check

Positive facts:
- Part A passed the visual check.

Negative facts:
- Part E does not has release approval.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_release_approval::Part E.
Target statement: Part E has release approval.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Is it true that Part D has release approval?

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_release_approval: has release approval
- has_supplier_note: has a supplier note
- may_ship: may ship to customers
- needs_engineer_review: needs engineer review
- passed_visual_check: passed the visual check

Positive facts:
- Part D passed the visual check.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_release_approval::Part D.
Target statement: Part D has release approval.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Rover 2 has a field note.
Rover 1 passed diagnostics.

has_field_note::Rover 2
passed_diagnostics::Rover 1

Is it true that Rover 1 has shift clearance?

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_field_note: has a field note
- has_shift_clearance: has shift clearance
- may_start_shift: may start its shift
- needs_operator_review: needs operator review
- passed_diagnostics: passed diagnostics

Positive facts:
- Rover 2 has a field note.
- Rover 1 passed diagnostics.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_shift_clearance::Rover 1.
Target statement: Rover 1 has shift clearance.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Closed-world assumption

Instruction: All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Closed-world assumption.
All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.
Complete predicates for this item: has_deployment_approval, has_incident_note, may_deploy, needs_sre_review, passed_unit_tests.

Predicate glossary:
- has_deployment_approval: has deployment approval
- has_incident_note: has an incident note
- may_deploy: may deploy to production
- needs_sre_review: needs SRE review
- passed_unit_tests: passed unit tests

Positive facts:
- Service B passed unit tests.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_deployment_approval::Service B.
Target statement: Service B has deployment approval.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Locally closed-world assumption

Instruction: Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Locally closed-world assumption.
Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: has_advising_clearance.

Predicate glossary:
- has_advising_clearance: has advising clearance
- has_external_scholarship: has an external scholarship
- may_register: may register for the seminar
- needs_manual_audit: needs a manual audit
- passed_exam: passed the qualifying exam

Positive facts:
- Iris passed the qualifying exam.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_advising_clearance::Iris.
Target statement: Iris has advising clearance.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Closed-world assumption

Instruction: All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.

Service D has deployment approval.
Service D passed unit tests.

has_deployment_approval::Service D
passed_unit_tests::Service D

passed_unit_tests::Service D
has_deployment_approval::Service D

has_deployment_approval::Service D
may_deploy::Service D
passed_unit_tests::Service D

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Closed-world assumption.
All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.
Complete predicates for this item: has_deployment_approval, has_incident_note, may_deploy, needs_sre_review, passed_unit_tests.

Predicate glossary:
- has_deployment_approval: has deployment approval
- has_incident_note: has an incident note
- may_deploy: may deploy to production
- needs_sre_review: needs SRE review
- passed_unit_tests: passed unit tests

Positive facts:
- Service D has deployment approval.
- Service D passed unit tests.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If a service passed unit tests and has deployment approval, then that service may deploy to production.

Target atom: may_deploy::Service D.
Target statement: Service D may deploy to production.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Instruction: All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Closed-world assumption.
All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.
Complete predicates for this item: assigned_to_trial, completed_training, has_clearance, may_enter_lab, needs_supervisor_review.

Predicate glossary:
- assigned_to_trial: is assigned to the clinical trial
- completed_training: has completed safety training
- has_clearance: has security clearance
- may_enter_lab: may enter Lab A
- needs_supervisor_review: needs supervisor review

Positive facts:
- Cora has completed safety training.

Negative facts:
- Ava is not assigned to the clinical trial.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: assigned_to_trial::Ava.
Target statement: Ava is assigned to the clinical trial.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Open-world assumption

Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Iris has an external scholarship.
Omar passed the qualifying exam.

Is it true that Omar has advising clearance?

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_advising_clearance: has advising clearance
- has_external_scholarship: has an external scholarship
- may_register: may register for the seminar
- needs_manual_audit: needs a manual audit
- passed_exam: passed the qualifying exam

Positive facts:
- Iris has an external scholarship.
- Omar passed the qualifying exam.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_advising_clearance::Omar.
Target statement: Omar has advising clearance.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Part F has a supplier note.
Part E passed the visual check.

has_supplier_note::Part F
passed_visual_check::Part E

Is it true that Part E has release approval?

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_release_approval: has release approval
- has_supplier_note: has a supplier note
- may_ship: may ship to customers
- needs_engineer_review: needs engineer review
- passed_visual_check: passed the visual check

Positive facts:
- Part F has a supplier note.
- Part E passed the visual check.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_release_approval::Part E.
Target statement: Part E has release approval.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Closed-world assumption

Instruction: All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Closed-world assumption.
All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.
Complete predicates for this item: has_advising_clearance, has_external_scholarship, may_register, needs_manual_audit, passed_exam.

Predicate glossary:
- has_advising_clearance: has advising clearance
- has_external_scholarship: has an external scholarship
- may_register: may register for the seminar
- needs_manual_audit: needs a manual audit
- passed_exam: passed the qualifying exam

Positive facts:
- Iris passed the qualifying exam.

Negative facts:
- Lena does not has advising clearance.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_advising_clearance::Lena.
Target statement: Lena has advising clearance.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Instruction: All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.

Rover 2 has shift clearance.
Rover 2 passed diagnostics.

has_shift_clearance::Rover 2
passed_diagnostics::Rover 2

passed_diagnostics::Rover 2
has_shift_clearance::Rover 2

has_shift_clearance::Rover 2
may_start_shift::Rover 2
passed_diagnostics::Rover 2

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Closed-world assumption.
All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.
Complete predicates for this item: has_field_note, has_shift_clearance, may_start_shift, needs_operator_review, passed_diagnostics.

Predicate glossary:
- has_field_note: has a field note
- has_shift_clearance: has shift clearance
- may_start_shift: may start its shift
- needs_operator_review: needs operator review
- passed_diagnostics: passed diagnostics

Positive facts:
- Rover 2 has shift clearance.
- Rover 2 passed diagnostics.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If a robot passed diagnostics and has shift clearance, then that robot may start its shift.

Target atom: may_start_shift::Rover 2.
Target statement: Rover 2 may start its shift.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Locally closed-world assumption

Instruction: Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Locally closed-world assumption.
Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: has_vendor_approval.

Predicate glossary:
- has_risk_note: has a risk note
- has_vendor_approval: has vendor approval
- may_receive_purchase_order: may receive a purchase order
- needs_procurement_review: needs procurement review
- submitted_tax_form: submitted a tax form

Positive facts:
- Vendor C submitted a tax form.

Negative facts:
- Vendor A does not has vendor approval.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_vendor_approval::Vendor A.
Target statement: Vendor A has vendor approval.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Closed-world assumption

Instruction: All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.

Service B has deployment approval.
Service B passed unit tests.

has_deployment_approval::Service B
passed_unit_tests::Service B

passed_unit_tests::Service B
has_deployment_approval::Service B

has_deployment_approval::Service B
may_deploy::Service B
passed_unit_tests::Service B

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Closed-world assumption.
All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false.
Complete predicates for this item: has_deployment_approval, has_incident_note, may_deploy, needs_sre_review, passed_unit_tests.

Predicate glossary:
- has_deployment_approval: has deployment approval
- has_incident_note: has an incident note
- may_deploy: may deploy to production
- needs_sre_review: needs SRE review
- passed_unit_tests: passed unit tests

Positive facts:
- Service B has deployment approval.
- Service B passed unit tests.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If a service passed unit tests and has deployment approval, then that service may deploy to production.

Target atom: may_deploy::Service B.
Target statement: Service B may deploy to production.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Open-world assumption

Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Part C has release approval.
Part C passed the visual check.

has_release_approval::Part C
passed_visual_check::Part C

passed_visual_check::Part C
has_release_approval::Part C

has_release_approval::Part C
may_ship::Part C
passed_visual_check::Part C

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_release_approval: has release approval
- has_supplier_note: has a supplier note
- may_ship: may ship to customers
- needs_engineer_review: needs engineer review
- passed_visual_check: passed the visual check

Positive facts:
- Part C has release approval.
- Part C passed the visual check.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If a part passed the visual check and has release approval, then that part may ship to customers.

Target atom: may_ship::Part C.
Target statement: Part C may ship to customers.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Rover 6 has shift clearance.
Rover 6 passed diagnostics.

has_shift_clearance::Rover 6
passed_diagnostics::Rover 6

passed_diagnostics::Rover 6
has_shift_clearance::Rover 6

has_shift_clearance::Rover 6
may_start_shift::Rover 6
passed_diagnostics::Rover 6

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_field_note: has a field note
- has_shift_clearance: has shift clearance
- may_start_shift: may start its shift
- needs_operator_review: needs operator review
- passed_diagnostics: passed diagnostics

Positive facts:
- Rover 6 has shift clearance.
- Rover 6 passed diagnostics.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If a robot passed diagnostics and has shift clearance, then that robot may start its shift.

Target atom: may_start_shift::Rover 6.
Target statement: Rover 6 may start its shift.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Locally closed-world assumption

Instruction: Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Locally closed-world assumption.
Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: has_release_approval.

Predicate glossary:
- has_release_approval: has release approval
- has_supplier_note: has a supplier note
- may_ship: may ship to customers
- needs_engineer_review: needs engineer review
- passed_visual_check: passed the visual check

Positive facts:
- Part A passed the visual check.

Negative facts:
- Part E does not has release approval.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_release_approval::Part E.
Target statement: Part E has release approval.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Instruction: Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.

submitted_tax_form::Vendor E
has_vendor_approval::Vendor E

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Locally closed-world assumption.
Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: has_vendor_approval, may_receive_purchase_order.

Predicate glossary:
- has_risk_note: has a risk note
- has_vendor_approval: has vendor approval
- may_receive_purchase_order: may receive a purchase order
- needs_procurement_review: needs procurement review
- submitted_tax_form: submitted a tax form

Positive facts:
- Vendor E submitted a tax form.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If a vendor submitted a tax form and has vendor approval, then that vendor may receive a purchase order.

Target atom: may_receive_purchase_order::Vendor E.
Target statement: Vendor E may receive a purchase order.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Open-world assumption

Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Is it true that Vendor E has vendor approval?

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_risk_note: has a risk note
- has_vendor_approval: has vendor approval
- may_receive_purchase_order: may receive a purchase order
- needs_procurement_review: needs procurement review
- submitted_tax_form: submitted a tax form

Positive facts:
- Vendor E submitted a tax form.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_vendor_approval::Vendor E.
Target statement: Vendor E has vendor approval.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Locally closed-world assumption

Instruction: Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.

Part A has release approval.
Part A passed the visual check.

has_release_approval::Part A
passed_visual_check::Part A

Is it true that Part F has a supplier note?

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Locally closed-world assumption.
Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: has_release_approval, may_ship.

Predicate glossary:
- has_release_approval: has release approval
- has_supplier_note: has a supplier note
- may_ship: may ship to customers
- needs_engineer_review: needs engineer review
- passed_visual_check: passed the visual check

Positive facts:
- Part A has release approval.
- Part A passed the visual check.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_supplier_note::Part F.
Target statement: Part F has a supplier note.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Open-world assumption

Instruction: Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.

Is it true that Vendor B has a risk note?

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Open-world assumption.
Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: none.

Predicate glossary:
- has_risk_note: has a risk note
- has_vendor_approval: has vendor approval
- may_receive_purchase_order: may receive a purchase order
- needs_procurement_review: needs procurement review
- submitted_tax_form: submitted a tax form

Positive facts:
- Vendor B submitted a tax form.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If a vendor has a risk note, then that vendor needs procurement review.

Target atom: needs_procurement_review::Vendor B.
Target statement: Vendor B needs procurement review.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.


Locally closed-world assumption

Instruction: Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.

Prompt:
You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.

Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: approve, deny, request_information.
- If action is request_information, missing_predicate must be the exact predicate name to check, missing_entity must be the exact entity to check, and question_to_ask must ask for that missing atom.
- If action is approve or deny, missing_predicate, missing_entity, and question_to_ask must be null.

Action mapping:
- approve iff the target statement is semantically true.
- deny iff the target statement is semantically false.
- request_information iff the target statement is semantically unknown.

Formal rule semantics:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then apply the semantic contract to unstated and underivable atoms.
- For a complete predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is false.
- For an open predicate P, if P(entity) is not explicitly stated and cannot be derived, then P(entity) is unknown.

Semantic contract: Locally closed-world assumption.
Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown.
Complete predicates for this item: has_shift_clearance.

Predicate glossary:
- has_field_note: has a field note
- has_shift_clearance: has shift clearance
- may_start_shift: may start its shift
- needs_operator_review: needs operator review
- passed_diagnostics: passed diagnostics

Positive facts:
- Rover 4 passed diagnostics.

Negative facts:
- Rover 2 does not has shift clearance.

Rules:
- none

Target atom: has_shift_clearance::Rover 2.
Target statement: Rover 2 has shift clearance.

Decide whether to approve the target statement, deny it, or request more information.