Account 61 has a manual exception.
Account 59 passed KYC checks.

has_manual_exception::Account 61
passed_kyc::Account 59

Prompt:
This is turn 1 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
You are given an initial knowledge base and an initial completeness state.
Do not use outside knowledge.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly open. For turn 1, changed_from_previous must be null.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Knowledge base:

Predicate glossary:
- has_compliance_clearance: has compliance clearance
- has_manual_exception: has a manual exception
- may_receive_wire: may receive a wire transfer
- needs_compliance_review: needs compliance review
- passed_kyc: passed KYC checks

Positive facts:
- Account 61 has a manual exception.
- Account 59 passed KYC checks.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target statement: Account 59 has compliance clearance.
Target atom: has_compliance_clearance::Account 59

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: SET_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- New complete predicates: none

Prompt:
This is turn 2 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly global_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: ADD_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Predicates to add as complete: has_compliance_clearance, has_manual_exception, may_receive_wire, needs_compliance_review, passed_kyc
- Complete predicates after this update: has_compliance_clearance, has_manual_exception, may_receive_wire, needs_compliance_review, passed_kyc

Target statement: Account 59 has compliance clearance.
Target atom: has_compliance_clearance::Account 59

Prompt:
This is turn 3 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly local_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: REPLACE_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Discard the previous complete-predicate set.
- Replacement complete predicates: has_compliance_clearance

Target statement: Account 59 has compliance clearance.
Target atom: has_compliance_clearance::Account 59


passed_kyc::Account 12
has_compliance_clearance::Account 12

Prompt:
This is turn 1 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
You are given an initial knowledge base and an initial completeness state.
Do not use outside knowledge.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly open. For turn 1, changed_from_previous must be null.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Knowledge base:

Predicate glossary:
- has_compliance_clearance: has compliance clearance
- has_manual_exception: has a manual exception
- may_receive_wire: may receive a wire transfer
- needs_compliance_review: needs compliance review
- passed_kyc: passed KYC checks

Positive facts:
- Account 12 passed KYC checks.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If an account passed KYC checks and has compliance clearance, then that account may receive a wire transfer.

Target statement: Account 12 may receive a wire transfer.
Target atom: may_receive_wire::Account 12

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: SET_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- New complete predicates: none

Prompt:
This is turn 2 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly global_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: ADD_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Predicates to add as complete: has_compliance_clearance, has_manual_exception, may_receive_wire, needs_compliance_review, passed_kyc
- Complete predicates after this update: has_compliance_clearance, has_manual_exception, may_receive_wire, needs_compliance_review, passed_kyc

Target statement: Account 12 may receive a wire transfer.
Target atom: may_receive_wire::Account 12

Prompt:
This is turn 3 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly local_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: REPLACE_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Discard the previous complete-predicate set.
- Replacement complete predicates: has_compliance_clearance, may_receive_wire

Target statement: Account 12 may receive a wire transfer.
Target atom: may_receive_wire::Account 12


Prompt:
This is turn 1 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
You are given an initial knowledge base and an initial completeness state.
Do not use outside knowledge.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly open. For turn 1, changed_from_previous must be null.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Knowledge base:

Predicate glossary:
- has_compliance_clearance: has compliance clearance
- has_manual_exception: has a manual exception
- may_receive_wire: may receive a wire transfer
- needs_compliance_review: needs compliance review
- passed_kyc: passed KYC checks

Positive facts:
- Account 59 passed KYC checks.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If an account has a manual exception, then that account needs compliance review.

Target statement: Account 59 needs compliance review.
Target atom: needs_compliance_review::Account 59

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: SET_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- New complete predicates: none

Prompt:
This is turn 2 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly global_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: ADD_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Predicates to add as complete: has_compliance_clearance, has_manual_exception, may_receive_wire, needs_compliance_review, passed_kyc
- Complete predicates after this update: has_compliance_clearance, has_manual_exception, may_receive_wire, needs_compliance_review, passed_kyc

Target statement: Account 59 needs compliance review.
Target atom: needs_compliance_review::Account 59

Prompt:
This is turn 3 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly local_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: REPLACE_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Discard the previous complete-predicate set.
- Replacement complete predicates: has_compliance_clearance, may_receive_wire

Target statement: Account 59 needs compliance review.
Target atom: needs_compliance_review::Account 59


Prompt:
This is turn 1 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
You are given an initial knowledge base and an initial completeness state.
Do not use outside knowledge.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly open. For turn 1, changed_from_previous must be null.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Knowledge base:

Predicate glossary:
- assigned_to_trial: is assigned to the clinical trial
- completed_training: has completed safety training
- has_clearance: has security clearance
- may_enter_lab: may enter Lab A
- needs_supervisor_review: needs supervisor review

Positive facts:
- Elena has completed safety training.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target statement: Elena is assigned to the clinical trial.
Target atom: assigned_to_trial::Elena

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: SET_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- New complete predicates: none

Prompt:
This is turn 2 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly global_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: ADD_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Predicates to add as complete: assigned_to_trial, completed_training, has_clearance, may_enter_lab, needs_supervisor_review
- Complete predicates after this update: assigned_to_trial, completed_training, has_clearance, may_enter_lab, needs_supervisor_review

Target statement: Elena is assigned to the clinical trial.
Target atom: assigned_to_trial::Elena

Prompt:
This is turn 3 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly local_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: REPLACE_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Discard the previous complete-predicate set.
- Replacement complete predicates: has_clearance, may_enter_lab

Target statement: Elena is assigned to the clinical trial.
Target atom: assigned_to_trial::Elena


Prompt:
This is turn 1 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
You are given an initial knowledge base and an initial completeness state.
Do not use outside knowledge.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly open. For turn 1, changed_from_previous must be null.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Knowledge base:

Predicate glossary:
- assigned_to_trial: is assigned to the clinical trial
- completed_training: has completed safety training
- has_clearance: has security clearance
- may_enter_lab: may enter Lab A
- needs_supervisor_review: needs supervisor review

Positive facts:
- Farid has completed safety training.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If a staff member has security clearance and has completed safety training, then that staff member may enter Lab A.

Target statement: Farid may enter Lab A.
Target atom: may_enter_lab::Farid

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: SET_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- New complete predicates: none

Prompt:
This is turn 2 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly global_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: ADD_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Predicates to add as complete: assigned_to_trial, completed_training, has_clearance, may_enter_lab, needs_supervisor_review
- Complete predicates after this update: assigned_to_trial, completed_training, has_clearance, may_enter_lab, needs_supervisor_review

Target statement: Farid may enter Lab A.
Target atom: may_enter_lab::Farid

Prompt:
This is turn 3 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly local_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: REPLACE_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Discard the previous complete-predicate set.
- Replacement complete predicates: has_clearance, may_enter_lab

Target statement: Farid may enter Lab A.
Target atom: may_enter_lab::Farid


Reader F has an active membership.
Reader A has a special request.

has_active_membership::Reader F
has_special_request::Reader A

Prompt:
This is turn 1 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
You are given an initial knowledge base and an initial completeness state.
Do not use outside knowledge.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly open. For turn 1, changed_from_previous must be null.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Knowledge base:

Predicate glossary:
- has_active_membership: has an active membership
- has_borrowing_clearance: has borrowing clearance
- has_special_request: has a special request
- may_borrow_archive_item: may borrow an archive item
- needs_librarian_review: needs librarian review

Positive facts:
- Reader F has an active membership.
- Reader A has a special request.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target statement: Reader F has borrowing clearance.
Target atom: has_borrowing_clearance::Reader F

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: SET_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- New complete predicates: none

Prompt:
This is turn 2 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly global_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: ADD_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Predicates to add as complete: has_active_membership, has_borrowing_clearance, has_special_request, may_borrow_archive_item, needs_librarian_review
- Complete predicates after this update: has_active_membership, has_borrowing_clearance, has_special_request, may_borrow_archive_item, needs_librarian_review

Target statement: Reader F has borrowing clearance.
Target atom: has_borrowing_clearance::Reader F

Prompt:
This is turn 3 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly local_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: REPLACE_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Discard the previous complete-predicate set.
- Replacement complete predicates: has_borrowing_clearance

Target statement: Reader F has borrowing clearance.
Target atom: has_borrowing_clearance::Reader F


passed_visual_check::Part D
has_release_approval::Part D

Prompt:
This is turn 1 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
You are given an initial knowledge base and an initial completeness state.
Do not use outside knowledge.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly open. For turn 1, changed_from_previous must be null.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Knowledge base:

Predicate glossary:
- has_release_approval: has release approval
- has_supplier_note: has a supplier note
- may_ship: may ship to customers
- needs_engineer_review: needs engineer review
- passed_visual_check: passed the visual check

Positive facts:
- Part D passed the visual check.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If a part passed the visual check and has release approval, then that part may ship to customers.

Target statement: Part D may ship to customers.
Target atom: may_ship::Part D

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: SET_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- New complete predicates: none

Prompt:
This is turn 2 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly global_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: ADD_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Predicates to add as complete: has_release_approval, has_supplier_note, may_ship, needs_engineer_review, passed_visual_check
- Complete predicates after this update: has_release_approval, has_supplier_note, may_ship, needs_engineer_review, passed_visual_check

Target statement: Part D may ship to customers.
Target atom: may_ship::Part D

Prompt:
This is turn 3 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly local_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: REPLACE_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Discard the previous complete-predicate set.
- Replacement complete predicates: has_release_approval, may_ship

Target statement: Part D may ship to customers.
Target atom: may_ship::Part D


Rover 3 has a field note.
Rover 2 passed diagnostics.

has_field_note::Rover 3
passed_diagnostics::Rover 2

Prompt:
This is turn 1 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
You are given an initial knowledge base and an initial completeness state.
Do not use outside knowledge.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly open. For turn 1, changed_from_previous must be null.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Knowledge base:

Predicate glossary:
- has_field_note: has a field note
- has_shift_clearance: has shift clearance
- may_start_shift: may start its shift
- needs_operator_review: needs operator review
- passed_diagnostics: passed diagnostics

Positive facts:
- Rover 3 has a field note.
- Rover 2 passed diagnostics.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target statement: Rover 2 has shift clearance.
Target atom: has_shift_clearance::Rover 2

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: SET_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- New complete predicates: none

Prompt:
This is turn 2 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly global_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: ADD_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Predicates to add as complete: has_field_note, has_shift_clearance, may_start_shift, needs_operator_review, passed_diagnostics
- Complete predicates after this update: has_field_note, has_shift_clearance, may_start_shift, needs_operator_review, passed_diagnostics

Target statement: Rover 2 has shift clearance.
Target atom: has_shift_clearance::Rover 2

Prompt:
This is turn 3 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly local_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: REPLACE_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Discard the previous complete-predicate set.
- Replacement complete predicates: has_shift_clearance

Target statement: Rover 2 has shift clearance.
Target atom: has_shift_clearance::Rover 2


Noah has an external scholarship.
Mia passed the qualifying exam.

Prompt:
This is turn 1 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
You are given an initial knowledge base and an initial completeness state.
Do not use outside knowledge.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly open. For turn 1, changed_from_previous must be null.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Knowledge base:

Predicate glossary:
- has_advising_clearance: has advising clearance
- has_external_scholarship: has an external scholarship
- may_register: may register for the seminar
- needs_manual_audit: needs a manual audit
- passed_exam: passed the qualifying exam

Positive facts:
- Noah has an external scholarship.
- Mia passed the qualifying exam.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- none

Target statement: Mia has advising clearance.
Target atom: has_advising_clearance::Mia

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: SET_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- New complete predicates: none

Prompt:
This is turn 2 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly global_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: ADD_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Predicates to add as complete: has_advising_clearance, has_external_scholarship, may_register, needs_manual_audit, passed_exam
- Complete predicates after this update: has_advising_clearance, has_external_scholarship, may_register, needs_manual_audit, passed_exam

Target statement: Mia has advising clearance.
Target atom: has_advising_clearance::Mia

Prompt:
This is turn 3 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly local_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: REPLACE_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Discard the previous complete-predicate set.
- Replacement complete predicates: has_advising_clearance

Target statement: Mia has advising clearance.
Target atom: has_advising_clearance::Mia


Prompt:
This is turn 1 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
You are given an initial knowledge base and an initial completeness state.
Do not use outside knowledge.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly open. For turn 1, changed_from_previous must be null.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Knowledge base:

Predicate glossary:
- has_advising_clearance: has advising clearance
- has_external_scholarship: has an external scholarship
- may_register: may register for the seminar
- needs_manual_audit: needs a manual audit
- passed_exam: passed the qualifying exam

Positive facts:
- Lena passed the qualifying exam.

Negative facts:
- none

Rules:
- If a student passed the qualifying exam and has advising clearance, then that student may register for the seminar.

Target statement: Lena may register for the seminar.
Target atom: may_register::Lena

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: SET_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- New complete predicates: none

Prompt:
This is turn 2 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly global_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: ADD_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Predicates to add as complete: has_advising_clearance, has_external_scholarship, may_register, needs_manual_audit, passed_exam
- Complete predicates after this update: has_advising_clearance, has_external_scholarship, may_register, needs_manual_audit, passed_exam

Target statement: Lena may register for the seminar.
Target atom: may_register::Lena

Prompt:
This is turn 3 of a 3-turn dynamic completeness dialogue.
Keep the exact same knowledge base, facts, rules, glossary, and target from turn 1.
Apply only the completeness-state update below.
Recompute the answer from the updated state. Do not treat a previous false/unknown conclusion as a new fact.
Return exactly one compact JSON object with keys answer, changed_from_previous, applied_update, and rationale. The answer value must be one of true, false, unknown. The changed_from_previous value must be true, false, or null. The applied_update value must be one of open, global_complete, local_complete. For this turn, applied_update must be exactly local_complete. For this turn, changed_from_previous must be true iff your current answer differs from your immediately previous answer.

Reasoning contract:
- Positive facts are true.
- Negative facts make the corresponding target atom false.
- A rule derives its conclusion only when every antecedent is true.
- First apply all rules until no new facts can be derived.
- Then evaluate unstated and underivable atoms using the current completeness state.
- If a predicate is complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is false.
- If a predicate is not complete, an unstated and underivable atom using that predicate is unknown.
- A false answer derived from completeness is not a permanent negative fact; it can be withdrawn if the completeness state changes.

Completeness-state update for this turn:
- Operation: REPLACE_COMPLETE_PREDICATES
- Discard the previous complete-predicate set.
- Replacement complete predicates: has_advising_clearance, may_register

Target statement: Lena may register for the seminar.
Target atom: may_register::Lena