Update README.md

README.md

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ size_categories:
 ---
 
 <p align="center">
-    <img src="assets/logo.png" width="100%" height="100%">
+    <img src="assets/logo.png" width="100%" height="100%" alt="Video-MME-v2 logo">
 </p>
 
 <p align="center">
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ size_categories:
 
 ---
 
-#  🤗 About This Repo
+# 🤗 About This Repo
 
 This repository contains annotation data for "Video-MME-v2: Towards the Next Stage in Benchmarks
 for Comprehensive Video Understanding". It mainly consists of three parts: `videos/`, `test.parquet`, and `subtitle.zip`.
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ for Comprehensive Video Understanding". It mainly consists of three parts: `vide
 In 2024, our [**Video-MME**](https://video-mme.github.io/) benchmark became a standard evaluation set for frontier models like Gemini and GPT. However, as model capabilities rapidly evolve, scores on existing benchmarks are saturating, yet a clear gap remains between **leaderboard performance and actual user experience**. This indicates that current evaluation paradigms fail to capture true video understanding abilities. To address this, we spent a year redesigning the evaluation system from first principles and now introduce **Video-MME v2**—a progressive and robust benchmark designed to drive the next generation of video understanding models.
 
 <p align="center">
-    <img src="assets/teaser.png" width="100%" height="100%">
+    <img src="assets/teaser.png" width="100%" height="100%" alt="Teaser">
 </p>
 
 - **Dataset Size**
@@ -77,7 +77,10 @@ In 2024, our [**Video-MME**](https://video-mme.github.io/) benchmark became a st
 
 ---
 
-# 🍺 Example
+# 🍺 About a Concrete Case
+
+> **💡 Why this example matters?** 
+> This video QA group demonstrates our **Reasoning Coherence** evaluation strategy and **Multi-level Hierarchy**. To answer the final state correctly, a model must successfully track the object backwards through temporal swaps. If a model guesses the initial state correctly but fails the intermediate swaps, our **first error truncation mechanism** will accurately penalize it for flawed reasoning.
 
 <p align="left">
   <a href="https://huggingface.co/datasets/MME-Benchmarks/Video-MME-v2/resolve/main/assets/demo.mp4">
@@ -92,7 +95,7 @@ In 2024, our [**Video-MME**](https://video-mme.github.io/) benchmark became a st
 <p>
 <strong>Q1:</strong> Does the ball exist underneath any of the shells?<br>
 A. No.<br>
-B. Yes.<br>
+B. Yes. ✅<br>
 C. Cannot be determined.
 </p>
 
@@ -104,7 +107,7 @@ C. The sixth shell.<br>
 D. The second shell.<br>
 E. The seventh shell.<br>
 F. The fifth shell.<br>
-G. The fourth shell.<br>
+G. The fourth shell. ✅<br>
 H. The first shell.
 </p>
 
@@ -112,7 +115,7 @@ H. The first shell.
 <strong>Q3:</strong> The host performed a total of two shell swaps (defining a single swap as an instance where all shells return to an approximately straight line). Underneath which shell was the ball located after the first swap?<br>
 A. There is no ball under any shell.<br>
 B. The seventh shell.<br>
-C. The fourth shell.<br>
+C. The fourth shell. ✅<br>
 D. The fifth shell.<br>
 E. The sixth shell.<br>
 F. The second shell.<br>
@@ -125,7 +128,7 @@ H. The first shell.
 A. The seventh shell.<br>
 B. The fourth shell.<br>
 C. The fifth shell.<br>
-D. The third shell.<br>
+D. The third shell. ✅<br>
 E. The second shell.<br>
 F. There is no ball under any shell.<br>
 G. The first shell.<br>