Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12.3%.

Rejected response: 10.4%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 12.3%

( millions ) the december 31 2015 of global industrial is $ 2560.8 ; the december 31 2015 of global institutional is $ 662.7 ; the december 31 2015 of global energy is $ 3151.5 ; the december 31 2015 of other is $ 115.8 ; the december 31 2015 of total is $ 6490.8 ;

( millions ) the december 31 2016 of global industrial is $ 2585.0 ; the december 31 2016 of global institutional is $ 590.7 ; the december 31 2016 of global energy is $ 3093.6 ; the december 31 2016 of other is $ 113.7 ; the december 31 2016 of total is $ 6383.0 ;

( millions ) the december 31 2017 of global industrial is $ 2797.0 ; the december 31 2017 of global institutional is $ 1027.0 ; the december 31 2017 of global energy is $ 3203.7 ; the december 31 2017 of other is $ 139.4 ; the december 31 2017 of total is $ 7167.1 ;

Answer: 12.3%

Question: what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill from 2015 to 2017?

Answer: 10.4%

Answer: 10.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2013 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 25%.

Rejected response: 27%.

GS || what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce <TIME> were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2013 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Answer: 25%

in millions the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2013 is 45826 ; the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is 46984 ;

in millions the total of average for theyear ended december 2013 is $ 182650 ; the total of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 172095 ;

the table below presents the fair value of the securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in our gce .

in millions the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2013 is $ 136824 ; the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 125111 ;

Answer: 25%

Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2012 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Answer: 27%

Answer: 27%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2012 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 27%.

Rejected response: 25%.

Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2012 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Answer: 27%

in millions the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2013 is $ 136824 ; the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 125111 ;

in millions the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2013 is 45826 ; the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is 46984 ;

in millions the total of average for theyear ended december 2013 is $ 182650 ; the total of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 172095 ;

Answer: 27%

Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2013 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Answer: 25%

Answer: 25%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2015 was the gfs segment?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 36%.

Rejected response: 46%.

FIS || what percent of total consolidated revenues <TIME> was the gfs segment?

Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2015 was the gfs segment?

Answer: 36%

the gfs of 2016 is 4250 ; the gfs of 2015 is 2360 ; the gfs of 2014 is 2198 ;

the total consolidated revenues of 2016 is $ 9241 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2015 is $ 6596 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2014 is $ 6413 ;

revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : .

Answer: 36%

Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2016 was the gfs segment?

Answer: 46%

Answer: 46%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2016 was the gfs segment?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 46%.

Rejected response: 36%.

Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2016 was the gfs segment?

Answer: 46%

revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : .

the gfs of 2016 is 4250 ; the gfs of 2015 is 2360 ; the gfs of 2014 is 2198 ;

the total consolidated revenues of 2016 is $ 9241 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2015 is $ 6596 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2014 is $ 6413 ;

Answer: 46%

Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2015 was the gfs segment?

Answer: 36%

Answer: 36%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1.9.

Rejected response: -4.1.

LMT || what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -1.9

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2014 is 322.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2013 is 326.5 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2012 is 328.4 ;

The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2014 is 316.8 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2013 is 320.9 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2012 is 323.7 ;

note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2014 is 316.8 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2013 is 320.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2012 is 323.7 ;

the computation of diluted earnings per common share excluded 2.4 million and 8.0 million stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive , primarily due to their exercise prices exceeding the average market prices of our common stock during the respective periods .

Answer: -1.9

Question: what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -4.1

the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding interest rate swaps at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 was $ 1.3 billion and $ 1.2 billion .

Answer: -4.1


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -4.1.

Rejected response: -1.9.

Question: what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -4.1

the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding interest rate swaps at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 was $ 1.3 billion and $ 1.2 billion .

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2014 is 322.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2013 is 326.5 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2012 is 328.4 ;

the computation of diluted earnings per common share excluded 2.4 million and 8.0 million stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive , primarily due to their exercise prices exceeding the average market prices of our common stock during the respective periods .

Answer: -4.1

Question: what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -1.9

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2014 is 316.8 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2013 is 320.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2012 is 323.7 ;

Answer: -1.9


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -7%.

Rejected response: 15%.

C || what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -7%

in billions of dollars the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2008 is $ 621.6 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2007 is $ 666.9 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2006 is $ 577.8 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2008 is $ 656.2 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2007 is $ 618.3 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of 2006 is $ 542.9 ;

in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 on-balance-sheet ( 1 ) $ 515.7 $ 557.8 $ 478.2 $ 548.8 $ 516.4 $ 446.2 securitized receivables ( all in na cards ) 105.9 108.1 99.6 106.9 98.9 96.4 credit card receivables held-for-sale ( 2 ) 2014 1.0 2014 0.5 3.0 0.3 total managed ( 3 ) $ 621.6 $ 666.9 $ 577.8 $ 656.2 $ 618.3 $ 542.9 ( 1 ) total loans and total average loans exclude certain interest and fees on credit cards of approximately $ 3 billion and $ 2 billion , respectively , for 2008 , $ 3 billion and $ 2 billion , respectively , for 2007 , and $ 2 billion and $ 3 billion , respectively , for 2006 , which are included in consumer loans on the consolidated balance sheet .

citigroup 2019s total allowance for loans , leases and unfunded lending commitments of $ 30.503 billion is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the entire portfolio .

for analytical purposes only , the portion of citigroup 2019s allowance for loan losses attributed to the consumer portfolio was $ 22.366 billion at december 31 , 2008 , $ 12.393 billion at december 31 , 2007 and $ 6.006 billion at december 31 , 2006 .

Answer: -7%

Question: what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 15%

Answer: 15%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 15%.

Rejected response: -7%.

Question: what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 15%

in billions of dollars the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2008 is $ 621.6 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2007 is $ 666.9 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2006 is $ 577.8 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2008 is $ 656.2 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2007 is $ 618.3 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of 2006 is $ 542.9 ;

in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 on-balance-sheet ( 1 ) $ 515.7 $ 557.8 $ 478.2 $ 548.8 $ 516.4 $ 446.2 securitized receivables ( all in na cards ) 105.9 108.1 99.6 106.9 98.9 96.4 credit card receivables held-for-sale ( 2 ) 2014 1.0 2014 0.5 3.0 0.3 total managed ( 3 ) $ 621.6 $ 666.9 $ 577.8 $ 656.2 $ 618.3 $ 542.9 ( 1 ) total loans and total average loans exclude certain interest and fees on credit cards of approximately $ 3 billion and $ 2 billion , respectively , for 2008 , $ 3 billion and $ 2 billion , respectively , for 2007 , and $ 2 billion and $ 3 billion , respectively , for 2006 , which are included in consumer loans on the consolidated balance sheet .

for analytical purposes only , the portion of citigroup 2019s allowance for loan losses attributed to the consumer portfolio was $ 22.366 billion at december 31 , 2008 , $ 12.393 billion at december 31 , 2007 and $ 6.006 billion at december 31 , 2006 .

Answer: 15%

Question: what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -7%

Answer: -7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2004?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1574.

Rejected response: -364.

AMT || what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2004?

Answer: -1574

the employee separations of liability as of january 1 2004 is $ 2239 ; the employee separations of 2004 expense is $ 823 ; the employee separations of 2004 cash payments is $ -2397 ( 2397 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 665 ; the employee separations of 2005 expense is $ 84 ; the employee separations of 2005 cash payments is $ -448 ( 448 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 301 ; the employee separations of 2006 expense is $ -267 ( 267 ) ; the employee separations of 2006 cash payments is $ -34 ( 34 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2006 is $ 0 ;

the accrued restructuring liability is reflected in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2005 .

restructuring expense 2014the following table displays activity with respect to the accrued restructuring liability for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 ( in thousands ) : liability as of january 1 , expense payments liability december 31 , expense payments liability december 31 , expense payments liability december 31 .

the total of liability as of january 1 2004 is $ 3689 ; the total of 2004 expense is $ 692 ; the total of 2004 cash payments is $ -3285 ( 3285 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 1096 ; the total of 2005 expense is $ 96 ; the total of 2005 cash payments is $ -773 ( 773 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 419 ; the total of 2006 expense is $ -277 ( 277 ) ; the total of 2006 cash payments is $ -142 ( 142 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2006 is $ 0 ;

Answer: -1574

Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2005?

Answer: -364

Answer: -364


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -364.

Rejected response: -1574.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2005?

Answer: -364

the employee separations of liability as of january 1 2004 is $ 2239 ; the employee separations of 2004 expense is $ 823 ; the employee separations of 2004 cash payments is $ -2397 ( 2397 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 665 ; the employee separations of 2005 expense is $ 84 ; the employee separations of 2005 cash payments is $ -448 ( 448 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 301 ; the employee separations of 2006 expense is $ -267 ( 267 ) ; the employee separations of 2006 cash payments is $ -34 ( 34 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2006 is $ 0 ;

the total of liability as of january 1 2004 is $ 3689 ; the total of 2004 expense is $ 692 ; the total of 2004 cash payments is $ -3285 ( 3285 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 1096 ; the total of 2005 expense is $ 96 ; the total of 2005 cash payments is $ -773 ( 773 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 419 ; the total of 2006 expense is $ -277 ( 277 ) ; the total of 2006 cash payments is $ -142 ( 142 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2006 is $ 0 ;

Answer: -364

Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2004?

Answer: -1574

Answer: -1574


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 75.00.

Rejected response: 77.1.

AWK || at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock <TIME>?

Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2018?

Answer: 75.00

the company repurchased 0.6 million shares and 0.7 million shares of common stock in the open market at an aggregate cost of $ 45 million and $ 54 million under this program for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .

as of december 31 , 2018 , there were 5.5 million shares of common stock available for purchase under the program. .

anti-dilutive stock repurchase program in february 2015 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized an anti-dilutive stock repurchase program , which allowed the company to purchase up to 10 million shares of its outstanding common stock over an unrestricted period of time .

Answer: 75.00

Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2017?

Answer: 77.1

Answer: 77.1


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 77.1.

Rejected response: 75.00.

Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2017?

Answer: 77.1

the company repurchased 0.6 million shares and 0.7 million shares of common stock in the open market at an aggregate cost of $ 45 million and $ 54 million under this program for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .

Answer: 77.1

Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2018?

Answer: 75.00

Answer: 75.00


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10%.

Rejected response: 5%.

JPM || what was the percentage change in loans retained <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 10%

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans retained of december 31 , 2012 is $ 306222 ; the loans retained of december 31 , 2011 is $ 278395 ; the loans retained of 2012 is $ 1434 ; the loans retained of 2011 is $ 2398 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) The loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2012 is 4406 ; The loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2011 is 2524 ; The loans held-for-sale of 2012 is 18 ; The loans held-for-sale of 2011 is 110 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2012 is 313183 ; The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2011 is 283016 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2012 is 1545 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2011 is 2581 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2012 is 4406 ; the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2011 is 2524 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2012 is 18 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2011 is 110 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2012 is 313183 ; the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2011 is 283016 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2012 is 1545 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2011 is 2581 ;

Answer: 10%

Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 5%

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans retained of december 31 , 2014 is $ 324502 ; the loans retained of december 31 , 2013 is $ 308263 ; the loans retained of 2014 is $ 599 ; the loans retained of 2013 is $ 821 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2014 is 330914 ; The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2013 is 321564 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2014 is 624 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2013 is 1044 ;

the firm distributes a significant percentage of the loans it originates into the market as part of its syndicated loan business and to manage portfolio concentrations and credit risk .

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2014 is 3801 ; the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2013 is 11290 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2014 is 4 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2013 is 26 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2014 is 330914 ; the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2013 is 321564 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2014 is 624 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2013 is 1044 ;

Answer: 5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5%.

Rejected response: 10%.

Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 5%

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans retained of december 31 , 2014 is $ 324502 ; the loans retained of december 31 , 2013 is $ 308263 ; the loans retained of 2014 is $ 599 ; the loans retained of 2013 is $ 821 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2014 is 3801 ; the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2013 is 11290 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2014 is 4 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2013 is 26 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2014 is 330914 ; the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2013 is 321564 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2014 is 624 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2013 is 1044 ;

Answer: 5%

Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 10%

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans retained of december 31 , 2012 is $ 306222 ; the loans retained of december 31 , 2011 is $ 278395 ; the loans retained of 2012 is $ 1434 ; the loans retained of 2011 is $ 2398 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2012 is 4406 ; the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2011 is 2524 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2012 is 18 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2011 is 110 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2012 is 313183 ; the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2011 is 283016 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2012 is 1545 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2011 is 2581 ;

Answer: 10%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.30%.

Rejected response: 3.75%.

MRO || what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate <TIME>?

Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2017?

Answer: 3.30%

the initial health care trend rate of 2017 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2016 is 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2015 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ;

the ultimate trend rate of 2017 is 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2016 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2015 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ;

The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2017 is 2025 ; The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2016 is 2025 ; The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2015 is 2024 ;

Answer: 3.30%

Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2016?

Answer: 3.75%

Answer: 3.75%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.75%.

Rejected response: 3.30%.

Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2016?

Answer: 3.75%

the initial health care trend rate of 2017 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2016 is 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2015 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ;

the ultimate trend rate of 2017 is 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2016 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2015 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ;

Answer: 3.75%

Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2017?

Answer: 3.30%

Answer: 3.30%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 due in 2012 are maturities of long-term debt?
Reference time interval: 2009-12-31 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 21%.

Rejected response: 41%.

IP || what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations <TIME> due <TIME> are maturities of long-term debt?

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 due in 2012 are maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 21%

in millions the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2010 is $ 304 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2011 is $ 574 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2012 is $ 199 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2013 is $ 131 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2014 is $ 562 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 7263 ;

in millions the total ( d ) of 2010 is $ 3262 ; the total ( d ) of 2011 is $ 1407 ; the total ( d ) of 2012 is $ 946 ; the total ( d ) of 2013 is $ 783 ; the total ( d ) of 2014 is $ 1173 ; the total ( d ) of thereafter is $ 16284 ;

contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 , were as follows : in millions 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 thereafter maturities of long-term debt ( a ) $ 304 $ 574 $ 199 $ 131 $ 562 $ 7263 debt obligations with right of offset ( b ) 519 28 2013 2013 2013 5108 .

Answer: 21%

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 due in 2011 are maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 41%

in millions the lease obligations of 2010 is 177 ; the lease obligations of 2011 is 148 ; the lease obligations of 2012 is 124 ; the lease obligations of 2013 is 96 ; the lease obligations of 2014 is 79 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 184 ;

Answer: 41%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 due in 2011 are maturities of long-term debt?
Reference time interval: 2009-12-31 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 41%.

Rejected response: 21%.

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 due in 2011 are maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 41%

in millions the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2010 is $ 304 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2011 is $ 574 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2012 is $ 199 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2013 is $ 131 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2014 is $ 562 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 7263 ;

in millions the lease obligations of 2010 is 177 ; the lease obligations of 2011 is 148 ; the lease obligations of 2012 is 124 ; the lease obligations of 2013 is 96 ; the lease obligations of 2014 is 79 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 184 ;

in millions the total ( d ) of 2010 is $ 3262 ; the total ( d ) of 2011 is $ 1407 ; the total ( d ) of 2012 is $ 946 ; the total ( d ) of 2013 is $ 783 ; the total ( d ) of 2014 is $ 1173 ; the total ( d ) of thereafter is $ 16284 ;

Answer: 41%

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 due in 2012 are maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 21%

contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 , were as follows : in millions 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 thereafter maturities of long-term debt ( a ) $ 304 $ 574 $ 199 $ 131 $ 562 $ 7263 debt obligations with right of offset ( b ) 519 28 2013 2013 2013 5108 .

Answer: 21%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1.6%.

Rejected response: -6.8%.

MRK || what is the growth rate in total sales <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2012?

Answer: -1.6%

( $ in millions ) the total sales of 2013 is $ 44033 ; the total sales of 2012 is $ 47267 ; the total sales of 2011 is $ 48047 ;

product sales sales of the company 2019s top pharmaceutical products , as well as total sales of animal health and consumer care products , were as follows: .

on october 1 , 2013 , the company divested a substantial portion of its third-party manufacturing sales .

( $ in millions ) the nasonex of 2013 is 1335 ; the nasonex of 2012 is 1268 ; the nasonex of 2011 is 1286 ;

Answer: -1.6%

Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2013?

Answer: -6.8%

( $ in millions ) the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2013 is 1306 ; the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2012 is 1273 ; the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2011 is 1202 ;

Answer: -6.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -6.8%.

Rejected response: -1.6%.

Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2013?

Answer: -6.8%

product sales sales of the company 2019s top pharmaceutical products , as well as total sales of animal health and consumer care products , were as follows: .

( $ in millions ) the total sales of 2013 is $ 44033 ; the total sales of 2012 is $ 47267 ; the total sales of 2011 is $ 48047 ;

( $ in millions ) the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2013 is 1306 ; the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2012 is 1273 ; the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2011 is 1202 ;

Answer: -6.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2012?

Answer: -1.6%

( $ in millions ) the nasonex of 2013 is 1335 ; the nasonex of 2012 is 1268 ; the nasonex of 2011 is 1286 ;

Answer: -1.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2013 compare to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10.8%.

Rejected response: 6.4%.

CE || what is the growth rate in dividends received <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2013 compare to 2012?

Answer: 10.8%

in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we received cash dividends of $ 92 million , $ 83 million and $ 78 million , respectively .

similar expansions since the ventures were formed have led to earnings growth and increased dividends for the company .

cigarette consumption in china is expected to grow at a rate of 1.9% ( 1.9 % ) per year from 2012 through 2017 .

although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) .

we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants .

Answer: 10.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2012 compare to 2011?

Answer: 6.4%

Answer: 6.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2012 compare to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.4%.

Rejected response: 10.8%.

Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2012 compare to 2011?

Answer: 6.4%

in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we received cash dividends of $ 92 million , $ 83 million and $ 78 million , respectively .

although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) .

we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants .

Answer: 6.4%

Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2013 compare to 2012?

Answer: 10.8%

Answer: 10.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the 2005 tax expense?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: $ 129.60.

Rejected response: $ 240.41.

AAPL || what was the <TIME> tax expense?

Question: what was the 2005 tax expense?

Answer: $ 129.60

the provision for income taxes of 2006 is $ 829 ; the provision for income taxes of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 480 ; the provision for income taxes of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 104 ;

the effective tax rate of 2006 is 29% ( 29 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is 27% ( 27 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is 28% ( 28 % ) ;

The computed expected tax of 2006 is $ 987 ; The computed expected tax of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 633 ; The computed expected tax of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 129 ;

the computed expected tax of 2006 is $ 987 ; the computed expected tax of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 633 ; the computed expected tax of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 129 ;

Answer: $ 129.60

Question: what was the 2006 tax expense?

Answer: $ 240.41

Answer: $ 240.41


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the 2006 tax expense?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: $ 240.41.

Rejected response: $ 129.60.

Question: what was the 2006 tax expense?

Answer: $ 240.41

the computed expected tax of 2006 is $ 987 ; the computed expected tax of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 633 ; the computed expected tax of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 129 ;

the provision for income taxes of 2006 is $ 829 ; the provision for income taxes of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 480 ; the provision for income taxes of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 104 ;

the effective tax rate of 2006 is 29% ( 29 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is 27% ( 27 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is 28% ( 28 % ) ;

Answer: $ 240.41

Question: what was the 2005 tax expense?

Answer: $ 129.60

Answer: $ 129.60


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 36%.

Rejected response: 64%.

PKG || what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2007?

Answer: 36%

total purchase commitments over the next two years are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

Answer: 36%

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2006?

Answer: 64%

commitments and contingencies ( continued ) purchase commitments the company has entered into various purchase agreements to buy minimum amounts of energy over periods ranging from one to two years at fixed prices .

Answer: 64%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 64%.

Rejected response: 36%.

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2006?

Answer: 64%

total purchase commitments over the next two years are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

Answer: 64%

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2007?

Answer: 36%

Answer: 36%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase from 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 34.9%.

Rejected response: 62.3%.

MRO || by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase <TIME>?

Question: by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 34.9%

december 31 2003 the december 31 2004 of $ 438 is 527 ;

december 31 2003 the december 31 2005 of $ 438 is 711 ;

the following summarizes the total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations as if fin no .

Answer: 34.9%

Question: by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase from 2003 to 2005?

Answer: 62.3%

47 , 2018 2018accounting for conditional asset retirement obligations 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no .

december 31 2003 the december 31 2003 of $ 438 is $ 438 ;

Answer: 62.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase from 2003 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 62.3%.

Rejected response: 34.9%.

Question: by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase from 2003 to 2005?

Answer: 62.3%

december 31 2003 the december 31 2003 of $ 438 is $ 438 ;

december 31 2003 the december 31 2004 of $ 438 is 527 ;

december 31 2003 the december 31 2005 of $ 438 is 711 ;

Answer: 62.3%

Question: by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 34.9%

the following summarizes the total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations as if fin no .

Answer: 34.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1.3%.

Rejected response: -2.1%.

GS || what is the growth rate in operating expenses <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2014?

Answer: -1.3%

$ in millions the total operating expenses of year ended december 2014 is $ 22171 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2013 is $ 22469 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2012 is $ 22956 ;

management 2019s discussion and analysis operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .

operating expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 22.17 billion for 2014 , essentially unchanged compared with 2013 .

operating expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 22.47 billion for 2013 , 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2012 .

Answer: -1.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2013?

Answer: -2.1%

Answer: -2.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2.1%.

Rejected response: -1.3%.

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2013?

Answer: -2.1%

$ in millions the total operating expenses of year ended december 2014 is $ 22171 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2013 is $ 22469 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2012 is $ 22956 ;

operating expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 22.17 billion for 2014 , essentially unchanged compared with 2013 .

operating expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 22.47 billion for 2013 , 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2012 .

Answer: -2.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2014?

Answer: -1.3%

Answer: -1.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations between 2008 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -14%.

Rejected response: -50%.

BLL || what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: -14%

( $ in millions ) the net sales of 2010 is $ 318.5 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 634.9 ; the net sales of 2008 is $ 735.4 ;

( $ in millions ) The discontinued operations net of tax of 2010 is $ -74.9 ( 74.9 ) ; The discontinued operations net of tax of 2009 is $ -2.2 ( 2.2 ) ; The discontinued operations net of tax of 2008 is $ 4.6 ;

( $ in millions ) the earnings from operations of 2010 is $ 3.5 ; the earnings from operations of 2009 is $ 19.6 ; the earnings from operations of 2008 is $ 18.2 ;

( $ in millions ) the discontinued operations net of tax of 2010 is $ -74.9 ( 74.9 ) ; the discontinued operations net of tax of 2009 is $ -2.2 ( 2.2 ) ; the discontinued operations net of tax of 2008 is $ 4.6 ;

Answer: -14%

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations between 2009 and 2010?

Answer: -50%

Answer: -50%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations between 2009 and 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -50%.

Rejected response: -14%.

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations between 2009 and 2010?

Answer: -50%

( $ in millions ) the net sales of 2010 is $ 318.5 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 634.9 ; the net sales of 2008 is $ 735.4 ;

( $ in millions ) the earnings from operations of 2010 is $ 3.5 ; the earnings from operations of 2009 is $ 19.6 ; the earnings from operations of 2008 is $ 18.2 ;

( $ in millions ) the discontinued operations net of tax of 2010 is $ -74.9 ( 74.9 ) ; the discontinued operations net of tax of 2009 is $ -2.2 ( 2.2 ) ; the discontinued operations net of tax of 2008 is $ 4.6 ;

Answer: -50%

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: -14%

Answer: -14%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 15%.

Rejected response: 6%.

UPS || what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , <TIME> are due <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2013?

Answer: 15%

commitment type the total of 2011 is $ 2944 ; the total of 2012 is $ 1334 ; the total of 2013 is $ 3515 ; the total of 2014 is $ 2059 ; the total of 2015 is $ 820 ; the total of after 2016 is $ 12884 ; the total of total is $ 23556 ;

the following table summarizes the expected cash outflow to satisfy our contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 ( in millions ) : .

contractual commitments we have contractual obligations and commitments in the form of capital leases , operating leases , debt obligations , purchase commitments , and certain other liabilities .

commitment type the debt principal of 2011 is 345 ; the debt principal of 2012 is 2014 ; the debt principal of 2013 is 1750 ; the debt principal of 2014 is 1000 ; the debt principal of 2015 is 100 ; the debt principal of after 2016 is 7363 ; the debt principal of total is 10558 ;

the table above does not include approximately $ 284 million of liabilities for .

Answer: 15%

Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2012?

Answer: 6%

Answer: 6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6%.

Rejected response: 15%.

Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2012?

Answer: 6%

commitment type the debt principal of 2011 is 345 ; the debt principal of 2012 is 2014 ; the debt principal of 2013 is 1750 ; the debt principal of 2014 is 1000 ; the debt principal of 2015 is 100 ; the debt principal of after 2016 is 7363 ; the debt principal of total is 10558 ;

commitment type the total of 2011 is $ 2944 ; the total of 2012 is $ 1334 ; the total of 2013 is $ 3515 ; the total of 2014 is $ 2059 ; the total of 2015 is $ 820 ; the total of after 2016 is $ 12884 ; the total of total is $ 23556 ;

the table above does not include approximately $ 284 million of liabilities for .

Answer: 6%

Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2013?

Answer: 15%

Answer: 15%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share between 2016 and 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12%.

Rejected response: 2%.

GS || what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share between 2016 and 2017?

Answer: 12%

dividends declared per common share were $ 2.90 in 2017 , $ 2.60 in 2016 and $ 2.55 in 2015 .

in millions except per share amounts The common share repurchases of year ended december 2017 is 29.0 ; The common share repurchases of year ended december 2016 is 36.6 ; The common share repurchases of year ended december 2015 is 22.1 ;

( board ) declared a dividend of $ 0.75 per common share to be paid on march 29 , 2018 to common shareholders of record on march 1 , 2018 .

the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program. .

Answer: 12%

Question: what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share between 2015 and 2016?

Answer: 2%

Answer: 2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share between 2015 and 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2%.

Rejected response: 12%.

Question: what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share between 2015 and 2016?

Answer: 2%

dividends declared per common share were $ 2.90 in 2017 , $ 2.60 in 2016 and $ 2.55 in 2015 .

( board ) declared a dividend of $ 0.75 per common share to be paid on march 29 , 2018 to common shareholders of record on march 1 , 2018 .

the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program. .

Answer: 2%

Question: what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share between 2016 and 2017?

Answer: 12%

Answer: 12%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in collateral posted between 2011 and 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -16%.

Rejected response: -25%.

GS || what was the percentage change in collateral posted <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in collateral posted between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: -16%

in millions the collateral posted of as of december 2012 is 24296 ; the collateral posted of as of december 2011 is 29002 ;

in millions The additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ; The additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 1303 ;

in millions The additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ; The additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 2183 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 1303 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 2183 ;

Answer: -16%

Question: what was the percentage change in collateral posted from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -25%

in millions the collateral posted of as of december 2013 is 18178 ; the collateral posted of as of december 2012 is 24296 ;

in millions The additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 911 ; The additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ;

in millions The additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 2989 ; The additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 911 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 2989 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ;

Answer: -25%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in collateral posted from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -25%.

Rejected response: -16%.

Question: what was the percentage change in collateral posted from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -25%

in millions the collateral posted of as of december 2013 is 18178 ; the collateral posted of as of december 2012 is 24296 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 911 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 2989 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ;

Answer: -25%

Question: what was the percentage change in collateral posted between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: -16%

in millions the collateral posted of as of december 2012 is 24296 ; the collateral posted of as of december 2011 is 29002 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 1303 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 2183 ;

Answer: -16%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2010 are made up of long-term debt obligations?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 56%.

Rejected response: 97%.

C || what percent of total contractual obligations <TIME> are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2010 are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 56%

in millions of dollars at year end the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 47162 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 59656 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 69344 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 28132 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2014 is $ 34895 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 124830 ;

in millions of dollars at year end the total of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 83659 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 61368 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 70718 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 29334 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2014 is $ 36040 ; the total of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 131392 ;

in millions of dollars at year end The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2010 is 1032 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2011 is 446 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2012 is 331 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2013 is 267 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2014 is 258 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year thereafter is 783 ;

( 2 ) relates primarily to accounts payable and accrued expenses included in other liabilities in citi 2019s consolidated balance sheet. .

Answer: 56%

Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2011 are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 97%

Answer: 97%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2011 are made up of long-term debt obligations?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 97%.

Rejected response: 56%.

Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2011 are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 97%

in millions of dollars at year end the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 47162 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 59656 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 69344 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 28132 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2014 is $ 34895 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 124830 ;

in millions of dollars at year end the total of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 83659 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 61368 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 70718 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 29334 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2014 is $ 36040 ; the total of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 131392 ;

( 2 ) relates primarily to accounts payable and accrued expenses included in other liabilities in citi 2019s consolidated balance sheet. .

Answer: 97%

Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2010 are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 56%

Answer: 56%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 35.8%.

Rejected response: 63.1%.

AMT || what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 35.8%

during the 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , offering periods , employees purchased 48886 , 53210 and 50119 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 33.93 , $ 24.98 and $ 15.32 , respectively .

the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 were $ 9.09 , $ 6.79 and $ 5.15 , respectively .

The weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2007 is 5.02% ( 5.02 % ) ; The weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2006 is 5.08% ( 5.08 % ) ; The weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2005 is 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) ;

the expected life of the shares of 2007 is 6 months ; the expected life of the shares of 2006 is 6 months ; the expected life of the shares of 2005 is 6 months ;

Answer: 35.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 63.1%

employees may purchase shares having a value not exceeding 15% ( 15 % ) of their gross compensation during an offering period and may not purchase more than $ 25000 worth of stock in a calendar year ( based on market values at the beginning of each offering period ) .

Answer: 63.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 63.1%.

Rejected response: 35.8%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 63.1%

employees may purchase shares having a value not exceeding 15% ( 15 % ) of their gross compensation during an offering period and may not purchase more than $ 25000 worth of stock in a calendar year ( based on market values at the beginning of each offering period ) .

during the 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , offering periods , employees purchased 48886 , 53210 and 50119 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 33.93 , $ 24.98 and $ 15.32 , respectively .

the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 were $ 9.09 , $ 6.79 and $ 5.15 , respectively .

Answer: 63.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 35.8%

the expected life of the shares of 2007 is 6 months ; the expected life of the shares of 2006 is 6 months ; the expected life of the shares of 2005 is 6 months ;

Answer: 35.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net sales from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.1%.

Rejected response: 13.7%.

BLL || what is the growth rate in net sales <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 13.1%

( $ in millions ) the net sales of 2011 is $ 8630.9 ; the net sales of 2010 is $ 7630.0 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 6710.4 ;

higher sales in 2010 compared to 2009 were due largely to sales associated with 2010 business acquisitions described above .

( $ in millions ) The net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2011 is 444.0 ; The net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2010 is 468.0 ; The net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2009 is 387.9 ;

( $ in millions ) the net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2011 is 444.0 ; the net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2010 is 468.0 ; the net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2009 is 387.9 ;

Answer: 13.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 13.7%

the higher net earnings from continuing operations in 2010 compared to 2009 included $ 105.9 million of equity gains on acquisitions associated with the acquisitions. .

Answer: 13.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net sales from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.7%.

Rejected response: 13.1%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 13.7%

( $ in millions ) the net sales of 2011 is $ 8630.9 ; the net sales of 2010 is $ 7630.0 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 6710.4 ;

( $ in millions ) the net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2011 is 444.0 ; the net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2010 is 468.0 ; the net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2009 is 387.9 ;

Answer: 13.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 13.1%

Answer: 13.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3833.

Rejected response: 79437.

AMT || what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2015?

Answer: -3833

the balance at january 1 of 2016 is $ 28114 ; the balance at january 1 of 2015 is $ 31947 ; the balance at january 1 of 2014 is $ 32545 ;

the balance at december 31 of 2016 is $ 107551 ; the balance at december 31 of 2015 is $ 28114 ; the balance at december 31 of 2014 is $ 31947 ;

during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the statute of limitations on certain unrecognized tax benefits lapsed and certain positions were effectively settled , which resulted in a decrease of $ 3.2 million , $ 3.5 million and $ 5.3 million , respectively , in the liability for uncertain tax benefits , all of which reduced the income tax provision .

the foreign currency of 2016 is -307 ( 307 ) ; the foreign currency of 2015 is -5371 ( 5371 ) ; the foreign currency of 2014 is -3216 ( 3216 ) ;

Answer: -3833

Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2016?

Answer: 79437

Answer: 79437


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 79437.

Rejected response: -3833.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2016?

Answer: 79437

the balance at january 1 of 2016 is $ 28114 ; the balance at january 1 of 2015 is $ 31947 ; the balance at january 1 of 2014 is $ 32545 ;

the foreign currency of 2016 is -307 ( 307 ) ; the foreign currency of 2015 is -5371 ( 5371 ) ; the foreign currency of 2014 is -3216 ( 3216 ) ;

the balance at december 31 of 2016 is $ 107551 ; the balance at december 31 of 2015 is $ 28114 ; the balance at december 31 of 2014 is $ 31947 ;

Answer: 79437

Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2015?

Answer: -3833

Answer: -3833


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2015 was net interest income?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 27%.

Rejected response: 46%.

JPM || what percentage of total net revenue <TIME> was net interest income?

Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2015 was net interest income?

Answer: 27%

( in millions ) the net interest income of 2015 is 43510 ; the net interest income of 2014 is 43634 ; the net interest income of 2013 is 43319 ;

( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2015 is $ 93543 ; the total net revenue of 2014 is $ 95112 ; the total net revenue of 2013 is $ 97367 ;

2014 compared with 2013 total net revenue for 2014 was down by 2% ( 2 % ) compared with the prior year , predominantly due to lower mortgage fees and related income and lower other income .

( a ) included operating lease income of $ 2.1 billion , $ 1.7 billion and $ 1.5 billion for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .

Answer: 27%

Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2014 was net interest income?

Answer: 46%

Answer: 46%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2014 was net interest income?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 46%.

Rejected response: 27%.

Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2014 was net interest income?

Answer: 46%

( in millions ) the net interest income of 2015 is 43510 ; the net interest income of 2014 is 43634 ; the net interest income of 2013 is 43319 ;

( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2015 is $ 93543 ; the total net revenue of 2014 is $ 95112 ; the total net revenue of 2013 is $ 97367 ;

( a ) included operating lease income of $ 2.1 billion , $ 1.7 billion and $ 1.5 billion for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .

Answer: 46%

Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2015 was net interest income?

Answer: 27%

Answer: 27%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2013 are due to compensation and benefits?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 49%.

Rejected response: 52%.

GS || what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses <TIME> are due to compensation and benefits?

Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2013 are due to compensation and benefits?

Answer: 49%

$ in millions the compensation and benefits of as of december 2014 is $ 8368 ; the compensation and benefits of as of december 2013 is $ 7874 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2014 is $ 16075 ; the total of as of december 2013 is $ 16044 ;

other liabilities and accrued expenses the table below presents other liabilities and accrued expenses by type. .

$ in millions the accrued expenses and other of as of december 2014 is 4751 ; the accrued expenses and other of as of december 2013 is 5183 ;

Answer: 49%

Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2014 are due to compensation and benefits?

Answer: 52%

Answer: 52%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2014 are due to compensation and benefits?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 52%.

Rejected response: 49%.

Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2014 are due to compensation and benefits?

Answer: 52%

$ in millions the compensation and benefits of as of december 2014 is $ 8368 ; the compensation and benefits of as of december 2013 is $ 7874 ;

$ in millions the accrued expenses and other of as of december 2014 is 4751 ; the accrued expenses and other of as of december 2013 is 5183 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2014 is $ 16075 ; the total of as of december 2013 is $ 16044 ;

Answer: 52%

Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2013 are due to compensation and benefits?

Answer: 49%

Answer: 49%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2001 compare to 2000?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -29.9%.

Rejected response: 12.0%.

D || what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2001 compare to 2000?

Answer: -29.9%

rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense was $ 84 million , $ 75 million and $ 107 million for 2002 , 2001 , and 2000 , respectively .

substantially all of the value was attributed to the power pur- chase contracts which were terminated and resulted in a charge included in operation and maintenance expense .

capacity and other purchases under these contracts totaled $ 691 million , $ 680 million and $ 740 million for 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .

the table below reflects dominion 2019s minimum commitments as of december 31 , 2002 under these contracts. .

estimated payments under these commitments for the next five years are as follows : 2003 2014$ 599 million ; 2004 2014$ 311 million ; 2005 2014$ 253 million ; 2006 2014$ 205 mil- lion ; 2007 2014$ 89 million ; and years beyond 2007 2014$ 215 mil- lion .

Answer: -29.9%

Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2002 compare to 2001?

Answer: 12.0%

the natural gas purchase com- mitments of dominion 2019s field services operations are also included , net of related sales commitments .

Answer: 12.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2002 compare to 2001?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12.0%.

Rejected response: -29.9%.

Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2002 compare to 2001?

Answer: 12.0%

the table below reflects dominion 2019s minimum commitments as of december 31 , 2002 under these contracts. .

estimated payments under these commitments for the next five years are as follows : 2003 2014$ 599 million ; 2004 2014$ 311 million ; 2005 2014$ 253 million ; 2006 2014$ 205 mil- lion ; 2007 2014$ 89 million ; and years beyond 2007 2014$ 215 mil- lion .

rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense was $ 84 million , $ 75 million and $ 107 million for 2002 , 2001 , and 2000 , respectively .

Answer: 12.0%

Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2001 compare to 2000?

Answer: -29.9%

Answer: -29.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3.6%.

Rejected response: 3.0%.

BLK || what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -3.6%

rent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 132 million , $ 137 million and $ 133 million in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively .

during the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swapmatured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .

in may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swapmaturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .

Answer: -3.6%

Question: what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 3.0%

Answer: 3.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.0%.

Rejected response: -3.6%.

Question: what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 3.0%

rent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 132 million , $ 137 million and $ 133 million in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively .

Answer: 3.0%

Question: what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -3.6%

Answer: -3.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2020?
Reference time interval: 2020-01-01 00:00:00 to 2021-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17%.

Rejected response: 18%.

UNP || what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due <TIME>?

Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2020?

Answer: 17%

millions the 2020 of operatingleases is 378 ; the 2020 of capitalleases is 155 ;

millions the total minimum lease payments of operatingleases is $ 2646 ; the total minimum lease payments of capitalleases is $ 898 ;

future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2018 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases .

millions the 2019 of operatingleases is $ 419 ; the 2019 of capitalleases is $ 148 ;

Answer: 17%

Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2021?

Answer: 18%

millions the 2021 of operatingleases is 303 ; the 2021 of capitalleases is 159 ;

millions the present value of minimum lease payments of operatingleases is n/a ; the present value of minimum lease payments of capitalleases is $ 754 ;

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2021?
Reference time interval: 2021-01-01 00:00:00 to 2022-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 17%.

Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2021?

Answer: 18%

millions the 2019 of operatingleases is $ 419 ; the 2019 of capitalleases is $ 148 ;

millions the 2021 of operatingleases is 303 ; the 2021 of capitalleases is 159 ;

millions the total minimum lease payments of operatingleases is $ 2646 ; the total minimum lease payments of capitalleases is $ 898 ;

Answer: 18%

Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2020?

Answer: 17%

millions the 2020 of operatingleases is 378 ; the 2020 of capitalleases is 155 ;

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of average equity from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1224.

Rejected response: 889.

UNP || what was the change in millions of average equity <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of average equity from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 1224

millions except percentages the average equity of 2011 is $ 18171 ; the average equity of 2010 is $ 17282 ; the average equity of 2009 is $ 16058 ;

return on average common shareholders 2019 equity millions , except percentages 2011 2010 2009 .

millions except percentages The return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2011 is 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) ; The return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2010 is 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ; The return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2009 is 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) ;

millions except percentages the return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2011 is 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) ; the return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2010 is 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ; the return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2009 is 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) ;

Answer: 1224

Question: what was the change in millions of average equity from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 889

Answer: 889


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of average equity from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 889.

Rejected response: 1224.

Question: what was the change in millions of average equity from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 889

return on average common shareholders 2019 equity millions , except percentages 2011 2010 2009 .

millions except percentages the average equity of 2011 is $ 18171 ; the average equity of 2010 is $ 17282 ; the average equity of 2009 is $ 16058 ;

millions except percentages the return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2011 is 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) ; the return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2010 is 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ; the return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2009 is 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) ;

Answer: 889

Question: what was the change in millions of average equity from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 1224

Answer: 1224


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate from 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -12.3%.

Rejected response: 51.2%.

ABMD || what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: -12.3%

the risk-free interest rate of 2003 is 2.92% ( 2.92 % ) ; the risk-free interest rate of 2004 is 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) ; the risk-free interest rate of 2005 is 3.87% ( 3.87 % ) ;

in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no .

in april 2005 , the the fair value per share of the options granted during fiscal 2003 , 2004 and 2005 was computed as $ 1.69 , $ 1.53 and $ 3.94 , per share , respectively , and was calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions. .

2005 annual report : financials page 15 notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 march 31 , 2005 in addition to compensation expense related to stock option grants , the pro forma compensation expense shown in the table above includes compensation expense related to stock issued under the company 2019s employee stock purchase plan of approximately $ 44000 , $ 19000 and $ 28000 for fiscal 2003 , 2004 and 2005 , respectively .

Answer: -12.3%

Question: what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 51.2%

Answer: 51.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate from 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 51.2%.

Rejected response: -12.3%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 51.2%

2005 annual report : financials page 15 notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 march 31 , 2005 in addition to compensation expense related to stock option grants , the pro forma compensation expense shown in the table above includes compensation expense related to stock issued under the company 2019s employee stock purchase plan of approximately $ 44000 , $ 19000 and $ 28000 for fiscal 2003 , 2004 and 2005 , respectively .

in april 2005 , the the fair value per share of the options granted during fiscal 2003 , 2004 and 2005 was computed as $ 1.69 , $ 1.53 and $ 3.94 , per share , respectively , and was calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions. .

the risk-free interest rate of 2003 is 2.92% ( 2.92 % ) ; the risk-free interest rate of 2004 is 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) ; the risk-free interest rate of 2005 is 3.87% ( 3.87 % ) ;

Answer: 51.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: -12.3%

Answer: -12.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in cash during 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -312.

Rejected response: 296.

BKR || what is the net change in cash <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in cash during 2016?

Answer: -312

( in millions ) the operating activities of 2017 is $ -799 ( 799 ) ; the operating activities of 2016 is $ 262 ; the operating activities of 2015 is $ 1277 ;

( in millions ) the investing activities of 2017 is -4130 ( 4130 ) ; the investing activities of 2016 is -472 ( 472 ) ; the investing activities of 2015 is -466 ( 466 ) ;

( in millions ) the financing activities of 2017 is 10919 ; the financing activities of 2016 is -102 ( 102 ) ; the financing activities of 2015 is -515 ( 515 ) ;

at december 31 , 2017 , we had cash and equivalents of $ 7.0 billion compared to $ 981 million of cash and equivalents at december 31 , 2016 .

cash flows cash flows provided by ( used in ) each type of activity were as follows for the years ended december 31: .

Answer: -312

Question: what is the net change in cash during 2015?

Answer: 296

Answer: 296


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in cash during 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 296.

Rejected response: -312.

Question: what is the net change in cash during 2015?

Answer: 296

at december 31 , 2017 , we had cash and equivalents of $ 7.0 billion compared to $ 981 million of cash and equivalents at december 31 , 2016 .

cash flows cash flows provided by ( used in ) each type of activity were as follows for the years ended december 31: .

( in millions ) the operating activities of 2017 is $ -799 ( 799 ) ; the operating activities of 2016 is $ 262 ; the operating activities of 2015 is $ 1277 ;

Answer: 296

Question: what is the net change in cash during 2016?

Answer: -312

Answer: -312


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was change in millions of free cash flow from 2005 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -29.

Rejected response: 282.

UNP || what was change in millions of free cash flow <TIME>?

Question: what was change in millions of free cash flow from 2005 to 2007?

Answer: -29

millions of dollars the free cash flow of 2007 is $ 487 ; the free cash flow of 2006 is $ 516 ; the free cash flow of 2005 is $ 234 ;

2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled a record $ 3.3 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 487 million in 2007 .

the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2007 2006 2005 .

millions of dollars the cash provided by operating activities of 2007 is $ 3277 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2006 is $ 2880 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2005 is $ 2595 ;

millions of dollars the cash used in investing activities of 2007 is -2426 ( 2426 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2006 is -2042 ( 2042 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2005 is -2047 ( 2047 ) ;

Answer: -29

Question: what was change in millions of free cash flow from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 282

Answer: 282


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was change in millions of free cash flow from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 282.

Rejected response: -29.

Question: what was change in millions of free cash flow from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 282

millions of dollars the cash provided by operating activities of 2007 is $ 3277 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2006 is $ 2880 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2005 is $ 2595 ;

millions of dollars the cash used in investing activities of 2007 is -2426 ( 2426 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2006 is -2042 ( 2042 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2005 is -2047 ( 2047 ) ;

millions of dollars the free cash flow of 2007 is $ 487 ; the free cash flow of 2006 is $ 516 ; the free cash flow of 2005 is $ 234 ;

Answer: 282

Question: what was change in millions of free cash flow from 2005 to 2007?

Answer: -29

Answer: -29


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11.8%.

Rejected response: 8.5%.

MO || what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 11.8%

( in millions ) the net earnings attributable to altria group inc . of for the years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 5070 ; the net earnings attributable to altria group inc . of for the years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 4535 ; the net earnings attributable to altria group inc . of for the years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 4180 ;

net earnings attributable to altria group , inc .

( in millions ) the earnings for basic and diluted eps of for the years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 5058 ; the earnings for basic and diluted eps of for the years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 4523 ; the earnings for basic and diluted eps of for the years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 4167 ;

Answer: 11.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 8.5%

Answer: 8.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8.5%.

Rejected response: 11.8%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 8.5%

( in millions ) the net earnings attributable to altria group inc . of for the years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 5070 ; the net earnings attributable to altria group inc . of for the years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 4535 ; the net earnings attributable to altria group inc . of for the years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 4180 ;

( in millions ) the earnings for basic and diluted eps of for the years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 5058 ; the earnings for basic and diluted eps of for the years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 4523 ; the earnings for basic and diluted eps of for the years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 4167 ;

net earnings attributable to altria group , inc .

Answer: 8.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 11.8%

Answer: 11.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -21.0%.

Rejected response: 16.5%.

ABMD || what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between <TIME> to <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -21.0%

the weighted average grant-date fair value for options granted during fiscal years 2005 , 2006 , and 2007 was $ 8.05 , $ 6.91 , and $ 8.75 per share , respectively .

the fair value of options granted during the fiscal years 2005 , 2006 and 2007 were calculated using the following weighted average assumptions: .

the calculation of the fair value of the options is net of estimated forfeitures .

the remaining unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for unvested stock option awards at march 31 , 2007 was approximately $ 9.0 million , net of forfeitures , and the weighted average time over which this cost will be recognized is 1.9 years .

Answer: -21.0%

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 16.5%

Answer: 16.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 16.5%.

Rejected response: -21.0%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 16.5%

the fair value of options granted during the fiscal years 2005 , 2006 and 2007 were calculated using the following weighted average assumptions: .

the weighted average grant-date fair value for options granted during fiscal years 2005 , 2006 , and 2007 was $ 8.05 , $ 6.91 , and $ 8.75 per share , respectively .

the remaining unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for unvested stock option awards at march 31 , 2007 was approximately $ 9.0 million , net of forfeitures , and the weighted average time over which this cost will be recognized is 1.9 years .

Answer: 16.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -21.0%

Answer: -21.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 52%.

Rejected response: 53%.

UNP || what percent of total route miles are main line <TIME>?

Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2005?

Answer: 52%

the main line of 2006 is 27318 ; the main line of 2005 is 27301 ;

the total of 2006 is 51596 ; the total of 2005 is 52667 ;

track 2013 the railroad operates on 32339 main line and branch line route miles in 23 states in the western two-thirds of the united states .

the branch line of 2006 is 5021 ; the branch line of 2005 is 5125 ;

Answer: 52%

Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2006?

Answer: 53%

Answer: 53%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 53%.

Rejected response: 52%.

Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2006?

Answer: 53%

the main line of 2006 is 27318 ; the main line of 2005 is 27301 ;

the branch line of 2006 is 5021 ; the branch line of 2005 is 5125 ;

the total of 2006 is 51596 ; the total of 2005 is 52667 ;

Answer: 53%

Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2005?

Answer: 52%

Answer: 52%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 102%.

Rejected response: 35%.

UNP || what was the percentage change in free cash flow <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 102%

millions the free cash flow of 2011 is $ 1917 ; the free cash flow of 2010 is $ 1415 ; the free cash flow of 2009 is $ 699 ;

f0b7 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled $ 5.9 billion , yielding record free cash flow of $ 1.9 billion in 2011 .

the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2011 2010 2009 .

millions the cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 5873 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2010 is $ 4105 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2009 is $ 3204 ;

millions the cash used in investing activities of 2011 is -3119 ( 3119 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2010 is -2488 ( 2488 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2009 is -2145 ( 2145 ) ;

Answer: 102%

Question: what was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2001 to 2011?

Answer: 35%

free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .

Answer: 35%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2001 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 35%.

Rejected response: 102%.

Question: what was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2001 to 2011?

Answer: 35%

millions the cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 5873 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2010 is $ 4105 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2009 is $ 3204 ;

millions the cash used in investing activities of 2011 is -3119 ( 3119 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2010 is -2488 ( 2488 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2009 is -2145 ( 2145 ) ;

millions the free cash flow of 2011 is $ 1917 ; the free cash flow of 2010 is $ 1415 ; the free cash flow of 2009 is $ 699 ;

Answer: 35%

Question: what was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 102%

Answer: 102%