Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases from july 2 , 2005 to july 1 , 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-07-02 00:00:00 to 2006-07-02 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7%.

Rejected response: 9%.

SYY || what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases from july 2 , 2005 to july 1 , 2006?

Answer: 7%

total rental expense under operating leases was $ 100690000 , $ 92710000 , and $ 86842000 in fiscal 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .

the fair value of total long-term debt approximated $ 1669999000 at july 1 , 2006 and $ 1442721000 at july 2 , 2005 , respectively .

as of july 1 , 2006 and july 2 , 2005 , letters of credit outstanding were $ 60000000 and $ 76817000 , respectively .

Answer: 7%

Question: what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases from july 1 , 2006 to july 2 , 2007?

Answer: 9%

Answer: 9%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases from july 1 , 2006 to july 2 , 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-07-01 00:00:00 to 2007-07-03 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9%.

Rejected response: 7%.

Question: what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases from july 1 , 2006 to july 2 , 2007?

Answer: 9%

total rental expense under operating leases was $ 100690000 , $ 92710000 , and $ 86842000 in fiscal 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .

Answer: 9%

Question: what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases from july 2 , 2005 to july 1 , 2006?

Answer: 7%

Answer: 7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2014 to the end of 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -35.

Rejected response: -530.

CMCSA || what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of <TIME> to the end of <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2014 to the end of 2015?

Answer: -35

( in millions ) the balance december 31 of 2015 is $ 1136 ; the balance december 31 of 2014 is $ 1171 ; the balance december 31 of 2013 is $ 1701 ;

reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits .

uncertain tax positions our uncertain tax positions as of december 31 , 2015 totaled $ 1.1 billion , which exclude the federal benefits on state tax positions that were recorded as deferred income taxes .

( in millions ) the balance january 1 of 2015 is $ 1171 ; the balance january 1 of 2014 is $ 1701 ; the balance january 1 of 2013 is $ 1573 ;

( in millions ) the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2015 is -84 ( 84 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2014 is -220 ( 220 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2013 is -141 ( 141 ) ;

Answer: -35

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2013 to the end of 2014?

Answer: -530

Answer: -530


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2013 to the end of 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -530.

Rejected response: -35.

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2013 to the end of 2014?

Answer: -530

( in millions ) the balance january 1 of 2015 is $ 1171 ; the balance january 1 of 2014 is $ 1701 ; the balance january 1 of 2013 is $ 1573 ;

( in millions ) the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2015 is -84 ( 84 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2014 is -220 ( 220 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2013 is -141 ( 141 ) ;

( in millions ) the balance december 31 of 2015 is $ 1136 ; the balance december 31 of 2014 is $ 1171 ; the balance december 31 of 2013 is $ 1701 ;

Answer: -530

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2014 to the end of 2015?

Answer: -35

Answer: -35


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2009?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 28%.

Rejected response: 30%.

C || what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses <TIME>?

Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2009?

Answer: 28%

Explanation: looking to see if the cost are outweighed by the payment stream prior to other write offs .

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2009 is $ 3173 ; the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ 3332 ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ 2723 ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 5 ) % ( % ) ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is 22% ( 22 % ) ;

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2009 is $ 896 ; the total operating expenses of 2008 is $ 988 ; the total operating expenses of 2007 is $ 1070 ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 9 ) % ( % ) ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is ( 8 ) % ( % ) ;

operating expenses decreased 8% ( 8 % ) , mainly driven by lower compensation and transaction expenses .

in millions of dollars the revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ -3682 ( 3682 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -39574 ( 39574 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -17896 ( 17896 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is 91% ( 91 % ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is nm ;

Answer: 28%

Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2008?

Answer: 30%

Answer: 30%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 30%.

Rejected response: 28%.

Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2008?

Answer: 30%

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2009 is $ 3173 ; the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ 3332 ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ 2723 ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 5 ) % ( % ) ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is 22% ( 22 % ) ;

in millions of dollars the revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ -3682 ( 3682 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -39574 ( 39574 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -17896 ( 17896 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is 91% ( 91 % ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is nm ;

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2009 is $ 896 ; the total operating expenses of 2008 is $ 988 ; the total operating expenses of 2007 is $ 1070 ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 9 ) % ( % ) ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is ( 8 ) % ( % ) ;

Answer: 30%

Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2009?

Answer: 28%

Explanation: looking to see if the cost are outweighed by the payment stream prior to other write offs .

Answer: 28%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2018 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5.54%.

Rejected response: 9.9%.

JPM || <TIME> what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

Question: in 2018 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

Answer: 5.54%

year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2018 2017 2016 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 55687 $ 51410 $ 47292 less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) 3087 4630 6334 net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) $ 52600 $ 46780 $ 40958 average interest-earning assets $ 2229188 $ 2180592 $ 2101604 less : average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 609635 540835 520307 average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets $ 1619553 $ 1639757 $ 1581297 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) 2.36% ( 2.36 % ) 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) net interest yield on average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 0.51 0.86 1.22 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) 2.85% ( 2.85 % ) 2.59% ( 2.59 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedges .

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) The less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2018 is 3087 ; The less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2017 is 4630 ; The less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2016 is 6334 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) The net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2018 is $ 52600 ; The net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2017 is $ 46780 ; The net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2016 is $ 40958 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2018 is $ 55687 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2017 is $ 51410 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2016 is $ 47292 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2018 is 3087 ; the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2017 is 4630 ; the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2016 is 6334 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2018 is $ 52600 ; the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2017 is $ 46780 ; the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2016 is $ 40958 ;

Answer: 5.54%

Question: in 2017 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

Answer: 9.9%

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) The net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2018 is $ 55687 ; The net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2017 is $ 51410 ; The net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2016 is $ 47292 ;

Answer: 9.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2017 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9.9%.

Rejected response: 5.54%.

Question: in 2017 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

Answer: 9.9%

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2018 is $ 55687 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2017 is $ 51410 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2016 is $ 47292 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2018 is 3087 ; the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2017 is 4630 ; the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2016 is 6334 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2018 is $ 52600 ; the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2017 is $ 46780 ; the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2016 is $ 40958 ;

Answer: 9.9%

Question: in 2018 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

Answer: 5.54%

Answer: 5.54%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -4.1%.

Rejected response: 42.9%.

FIS || what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -4.1%

during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , we generated approximately $ 1830 million , $ 1909 million and $ 1336 million , respectively , in revenues denominated in currencies other than the u.s .

a 10% ( 10 % ) move in average exchange rates for these currencies ( assuming a simultaneous and immediate 10% ( 10 % ) change in all of such rates for the relevant period ) would have resulted in the following increase or ( decrease ) in our reported revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in millions ) : .

our exposure to foreign currency exchange risks generally arises from our non-u.s .

dollar during these years compared to the preceding year .

Answer: -4.1%

Question: what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 42.9%

Answer: 42.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 42.9%.

Rejected response: -4.1%.

Question: what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 42.9%

during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , we generated approximately $ 1830 million , $ 1909 million and $ 1336 million , respectively , in revenues denominated in currencies other than the u.s .

dollar during these years compared to the preceding year .

Answer: 42.9%

Question: what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -4.1%

Answer: -4.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3%.

Rejected response: 70%.

FIS || what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -3%

cash flows from operations cash flows from operations were $ 1925 million , $ 1131 million and $ 1165 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 respectively .

the 2016 increase in cash flows from operations is primarily due to increased net earnings , after the add back of non-cash depreciation and amortization , as a result of sungard operations being included for the full year .

we expect that cash and cash equivalents plus cash flows from operations over the next twelve months will be sufficient to fund our operating cash requirements , capital expenditures and mandatory debt service .

type of obligations the total of total is $ 14429 ; the total of payments due in less than 1 year is $ 1068 ; the total of payments due in 1-3 years is $ 2712 ; the total of payments due in 3-5 years is $ 3264 ; the total of payments due in more than 5 years is $ 7385 ;

Answer: -3%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 70%

ck ash flows from operations increased $ 794 million in 2016 and decreased $ 34 million in 2015 .

Answer: 70%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 70%.

Rejected response: -3%.

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 70%

we expect that cash and cash equivalents plus cash flows from operations over the next twelve months will be sufficient to fund our operating cash requirements , capital expenditures and mandatory debt service .

cash flows from operations cash flows from operations were $ 1925 million , $ 1131 million and $ 1165 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 respectively .

type of obligations the total of total is $ 14429 ; the total of payments due in less than 1 year is $ 1068 ; the total of payments due in 1-3 years is $ 2712 ; the total of payments due in 3-5 years is $ 3264 ; the total of payments due in more than 5 years is $ 7385 ;

Answer: 70%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -3%

Answer: -3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3%.

Rejected response: 42%.

FIS || what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 3%

currency the euro of 2012 is 27.1 ; the euro of 2011 is 26.4 ; the euro of 2010 is 18.6 ;

the impact on earnings of the foregoing assumed 10% ( 10 % ) change in each of the periods presented would not have been significant .

currency The total impact of 2012 is $ 90.3 ; The total impact of 2011 is $ 90.0 ; The total impact of 2010 is $ 62.7 ;

currency the total impact of 2012 is $ 90.3 ; the total impact of 2011 is $ 90.0 ; the total impact of 2010 is $ 62.7 ;

Answer: 3%

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 42%

Answer: 42%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 42%.

Rejected response: 3%.

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 42%

currency the euro of 2012 is 27.1 ; the euro of 2011 is 26.4 ; the euro of 2010 is 18.6 ;

currency the total impact of 2012 is $ 90.3 ; the total impact of 2011 is $ 90.0 ; the total impact of 2010 is $ 62.7 ;

Answer: 42%

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 3%

Answer: 3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -71.

Rejected response: 18.

AON || what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2007?

Answer: -71

balance at january 1 2005 the expensed in 2007 of $ 2014 is 38 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the cash payments in 2007 of $ 2014 is -110 ( 110 ) ;

balance at january 1 2005 the foreign currency revaluation of $ 2014 is 1 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2005 of $ 2014 is 116 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2007 of $ 2014 is $ 63 ;

Answer: -71

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2006?

Answer: 18

balance at january 1 2005 the expensed in 2006 of $ 2014 is 155 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the cash payments in 2006 of $ 2014 is -141 ( 141 ) ;

balance at january 1 2005 the foreign currency revaluation of $ 2014 is 4 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2006 of $ 2014 is 134 ;

Answer: 18


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18.

Rejected response: -71.

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2006?

Answer: 18

balance at january 1 2005 the expensed in 2006 of $ 2014 is 155 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2006 of $ 2014 is 134 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2007 of $ 2014 is $ 63 ;

Answer: 18

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2007?

Answer: -71

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2005 of $ 2014 is 116 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the expensed in 2007 of $ 2014 is 38 ;

Answer: -71


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6%.

Rejected response: 7%.

IP || brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers <TIME>?

Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2005?

Answer: 6%

in millions the sales of 2006 is $ 6930 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 7170 ; the sales of 2004 is $ 7135 ;

brazil ian paper net sales for 2006 of $ 496 mil- lion were higher than the $ 465 million in 2005 and the $ 417 million in 2004 .

printing papers in millions 2006 2005 2004 .

in millions the operating profit of 2006 is $ 677 ; the operating profit of 2005 is $ 473 ; the operating profit of 2004 is $ 508 ;

Answer: 6%

Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2006?

Answer: 7%

Answer: 7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7%.

Rejected response: 6%.

Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2006?

Answer: 7%

in millions the sales of 2006 is $ 6930 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 7170 ; the sales of 2004 is $ 7135 ;

in millions the operating profit of 2006 is $ 677 ; the operating profit of 2005 is $ 473 ; the operating profit of 2004 is $ 508 ;

brazil ian paper net sales for 2006 of $ 496 mil- lion were higher than the $ 465 million in 2005 and the $ 417 million in 2004 .

Answer: 7%

Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2005?

Answer: 6%

Answer: 6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -37.0%.

Rejected response: 21.5%.

L || what is the return on investment for s&p500 <TIME>?

Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -37.0%

the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2004 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2009 .

the loews common stock of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews common stock of 2005 is 135.92 ; the loews common stock of 2006 is 179.47 ; the loews common stock of 2007 is 219.01 ; the loews common stock of 2008 is 123.70 ; the loews common stock of 2009 is 160.62 ;

the loews peer group ( a ) of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2005 is 133.59 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2006 is 152.24 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2007 is 174.46 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2008 is 106.30 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2009 is 136.35 ;

Answer: -37.0%

Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2004 to 2006?

Answer: 21.5%

subtract(121.48, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

Answer: 21.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2004 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 21.5%.

Rejected response: -37.0%.

Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2004 to 2006?

Answer: 21.5%

subtract(121.48, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the loews common stock of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews common stock of 2005 is 135.92 ; the loews common stock of 2006 is 179.47 ; the loews common stock of 2007 is 219.01 ; the loews common stock of 2008 is 123.70 ; the loews common stock of 2009 is 160.62 ;

the loews peer group ( a ) of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2005 is 133.59 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2006 is 152.24 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2007 is 174.46 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2008 is 106.30 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2009 is 136.35 ;

Answer: 21.5%

Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -37.0%

Answer: -37.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2016 was do to interest rate risks?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 54%.

Rejected response: 57%.

C || what percentage of total principal transactions revenue <TIME> was do to interest rate risks?

Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2016 was do to interest rate risks?

Answer: 54%

in millions of dollars the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2018 is $ 5186 ; the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2017 is $ 5301 ; the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2016 is $ 4229 ;

in millions of dollars the total of 2018 is $ 9062 ; the total of 2017 is $ 9475 ; the total of 2016 is $ 7857 ;

the following table presents principal transactions revenue: .

( 5 ) includes revenues from structured credit products. .

Answer: 54%

Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2018 was do to interest rate risks?

Answer: 57%

Answer: 57%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2018 was do to interest rate risks?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 57%.

Rejected response: 54%.

Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2018 was do to interest rate risks?

Answer: 57%

in millions of dollars the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2018 is $ 5186 ; the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2017 is $ 5301 ; the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2016 is $ 4229 ;

in millions of dollars the total of 2018 is $ 9062 ; the total of 2017 is $ 9475 ; the total of 2016 is $ 7857 ;

( 5 ) includes revenues from structured credit products. .

Answer: 57%

Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2016 was do to interest rate risks?

Answer: 54%

Answer: 54%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net income per common share in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: .385.

Rejected response: 1.56.

DRE || what is the net income per common share <TIME>?

Question: what is the net income per common share in 2008?

Answer: .385

the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2008 is $ 56616 ; the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2007 is $ 217692 ; the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2006 is $ 145095 ;

the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2008 is 146915 ; the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2007 is 139255 ; the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2006 is 134883 ;

unbilled receivables on construction contracts totaled $ 22.7 million and $ 33.1 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

the specific timing of the sale is measured against various criteria in sfas 66 related to the terms of the transactions and any continuing involvement in the form of management or financial assistance from the seller associated with the properties .

the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2008 is $ 59584 ; the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2007 is $ 232091 ; the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2006 is $ 159333 ;

Answer: .385

Question: what is the net income per common share in 2007?

Answer: 1.56

Answer: 1.56


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net income per common share in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.56.

Rejected response: .385.

Question: what is the net income per common share in 2007?

Answer: 1.56

the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2008 is $ 56616 ; the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2007 is $ 217692 ; the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2006 is $ 145095 ;

the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2008 is $ 59584 ; the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2007 is $ 232091 ; the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2006 is $ 159333 ;

the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2008 is 146915 ; the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2007 is 139255 ; the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2006 is 134883 ;

Answer: 1.56

Question: what is the net income per common share in 2008?

Answer: .385

Answer: .385


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: at december 31 , 2006 , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2006-12-31 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 20%.

Rejected response: 6%.

IP || <TIME> , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due <TIME>?

Question: at december 31 , 2006 , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due in 2008?

Answer: 20%

in millions the lease obligations ( a ) of 2007 is $ 144 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2008 is $ 117 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2009 is $ 94 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2010 is $ 74 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2011 is $ 60 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of thereafter is $ 110 ;

in millions the total of 2007 is $ 2473 ; the total of 2008 is $ 579 ; the total of 2009 is $ 456 ; the total of 2010 is $ 426 ; the total of 2011 is $ 383 ; the total of thereafter is $ 1904 ;

at december 31 , 2006 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations were as follows : in millions 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter .

in millions the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2007 is 2329 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2008 is 462 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2009 is 362 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2010 is 352 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2011 is 323 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of thereafter is 1794 ;

Answer: 20%

Question: at december 31 , 2006 , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due in 2007?

Answer: 6%

Answer: 6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: at december 31 , 2006 , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-12-31 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6%.

Rejected response: 20%.

Question: at december 31 , 2006 , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due in 2007?

Answer: 6%

in millions the lease obligations ( a ) of 2007 is $ 144 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2008 is $ 117 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2009 is $ 94 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2010 is $ 74 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2011 is $ 60 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of thereafter is $ 110 ;

in millions the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2007 is 2329 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2008 is 462 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2009 is 362 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2010 is 352 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2011 is 323 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of thereafter is 1794 ;

in millions the total of 2007 is $ 2473 ; the total of 2008 is $ 579 ; the total of 2009 is $ 456 ; the total of 2010 is $ 426 ; the total of 2011 is $ 383 ; the total of thereafter is $ 1904 ;

Answer: 6%

Question: at december 31 , 2006 , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due in 2008?

Answer: 20%

Answer: 20%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 33%.

Rejected response: 34%.

CMCSA || what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2014?

Answer: 33%

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the cable distribution system of 2015 is $ 2424 ; the cable distribution system of 2014 is $ 2047 ; the cable distribution system of 2013 is $ 1819 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the other equipment of 2015 is 756 ; the other equipment of 2014 is 613 ; the other equipment of 2013 is 527 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total of 2015 is $ 7034 ; the total of 2014 is $ 6154 ; the total of 2013 is $ 5403 ;

the table below summarizes the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable communications segment in 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .

Answer: 33%

Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2015?

Answer: 34%

Answer: 34%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 34%.

Rejected response: 33%.

Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2015?

Answer: 34%

the table below summarizes the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable communications segment in 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the cable distribution system of 2015 is $ 2424 ; the cable distribution system of 2014 is $ 2047 ; the cable distribution system of 2013 is $ 1819 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total of 2015 is $ 7034 ; the total of 2014 is $ 6154 ; the total of 2013 is $ 5403 ;

Answer: 34%

Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2014?

Answer: 33%

Answer: 33%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2018?\\n
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 117624.84.

Rejected response: 95983.54.

GPN || what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , <TIME>?\\n

Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2018?\\n

Answer: 117624.84

Explanation: this gives us the potential compensation look for the net granting activity at year end .

the unvested at december 31 2018 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1084 ; the unvested at december 31 2018 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 108.51 ;

The unvested at december 31 2016 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1263 ; The unvested at december 31 2016 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 49.55 ;

The unvested at december 31 2017 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1226 ; The unvested at december 31 2017 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 78.29 ;

the unvested at december 31 2016 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1263 ; the unvested at december 31 2016 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 49.55 ;

the unvested at december 31 2017 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1226 ; the unvested at december 31 2017 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 78.29 ;

Answer: 117624.84

Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2017?\\n

Answer: 95983.54

The unvested at december 31 2018 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1084 ; The unvested at december 31 2018 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 108.51 ;

Answer: 95983.54


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2017?\\n
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 95983.54.

Rejected response: 117624.84.

Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2017?\\n

Answer: 95983.54

the unvested at december 31 2016 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1263 ; the unvested at december 31 2016 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 49.55 ;

the unvested at december 31 2017 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1226 ; the unvested at december 31 2017 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 78.29 ;

the unvested at december 31 2018 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1084 ; the unvested at december 31 2018 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 108.51 ;

Answer: 95983.54

Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2018?\\n

Answer: 117624.84

Explanation: this gives us the potential compensation look for the net granting activity at year end .

Answer: 117624.84


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2016 compare to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -41.

Rejected response: 33.

CE || what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2016 compare to 2015?

Answer: -41

research and development expense was $ 78 million , $ 119 million and $ 86 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives .

research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications .

Answer: -41

Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2015 compare to 2014?

Answer: 33

Answer: 33


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2015 compare to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 33.

Rejected response: -41.

Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2015 compare to 2014?

Answer: 33

research and development expense was $ 78 million , $ 119 million and $ 86 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives .

Answer: 33

Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2016 compare to 2015?

Answer: -41

Answer: -41


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3.6%.

Rejected response: -7.8%.

LMT || what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -3.6%

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2012 is 323.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2011 is 335.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2010 is 364.2 ;

The weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2012 is 328.4 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2011 is 339.9 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2010 is 368.3 ;

we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2012 is 328.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2011 is 339.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2010 is 368.3 ;

the computation of diluted earnings per common share excluded 8.0 million , 13.4 million , and 14.7 million stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive , primarily due to their exercise prices exceeding the average market price of our common stock during each respective reporting period .

Answer: -3.6%

Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: -7.8%

Answer: -7.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -7.8%.

Rejected response: -3.6%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: -7.8%

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2012 is 323.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2011 is 335.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2010 is 364.2 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2012 is 328.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2011 is 339.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2010 is 368.3 ;

the computation of diluted earnings per common share excluded 8.0 million , 13.4 million , and 14.7 million stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive , primarily due to their exercise prices exceeding the average market price of our common stock during each respective reporting period .

Answer: -7.8%

Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -3.6%

Answer: -3.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation from 2014 to 2015 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2.

Rejected response: 1.

ZBH || what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation <TIME> in millions?

Question: what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation from 2014 to 2015 in millions?

Answer: -2

for the years ended december 31 , the total expense net of tax of 2015 is $ 31.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2014 is $ 33.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2013 is $ 32.9 ;

share-based compensation expense was as follows ( in millions ) : .

for the years ended december 31, The total expense pre-tax of 2015 is $ 46.4 ; The total expense pre-tax of 2014 is $ 49.4 ; The total expense pre-tax of 2013 is $ 48.5 ;

for the years ended december 31, the total expense pre-tax of 2015 is $ 46.4 ; the total expense pre-tax of 2014 is $ 49.4 ; the total expense pre-tax of 2013 is $ 48.5 ;

for the years ended december 31, the total expense net of tax of 2015 is $ 31.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2014 is $ 33.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2013 is $ 32.9 ;

we have registered 57.9 million shares of common stock under these plans .

Answer: -2

Question: what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation from 2013 to 2014 in millions?

Answer: 1

Answer: 1


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation from 2013 to 2014 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.

Rejected response: -2.

Question: what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation from 2013 to 2014 in millions?

Answer: 1

for the years ended december 31, the total expense pre-tax of 2015 is $ 46.4 ; the total expense pre-tax of 2014 is $ 49.4 ; the total expense pre-tax of 2013 is $ 48.5 ;

for the years ended december 31, the total expense net of tax of 2015 is $ 31.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2014 is $ 33.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2013 is $ 32.9 ;

we have registered 57.9 million shares of common stock under these plans .

Answer: 1

Question: what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation from 2014 to 2015 in millions?

Answer: -2

Answer: -2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 due in 2008 is attributable to total debt repayments?
Reference time interval: 2006-12-31 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 22%.

IP || what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations <TIME> due <TIME> is attributable to total debt repayments?

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 due in 2008 is attributable to total debt repayments?

Answer: 18%

in millions the total debt ( a ) of 2007 is $ 692 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2008 is $ 129 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2009 is $ 1143 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2010 is $ 1198 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2011 is $ 381 ; the total debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 3680 ;

in millions the total of 2007 is $ 3165 ; the total of 2008 is $ 708 ; the total of 2009 is $ 1599 ; the total of 2010 is $ 1624 ; the total of 2011 is $ 764 ; the total of thereafter is $ 5584 ;

contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 , were as follows : in millions 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter .

principal financial covenants include maintenance of a minimum net worth , defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock , plus any goodwill impairment charges , of $ 9 billion ; and a maximum total debt to capital ratio , defined as total debt divided by total debt plus net worth , of maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy .

Answer: 18%

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 due in 2007 is attributable to total debt repayments?

Answer: 22%

Answer: 22%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 due in 2007 is attributable to total debt repayments?
Reference time interval: 2006-12-31 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 22%.

Rejected response: 18%.

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 due in 2007 is attributable to total debt repayments?

Answer: 22%

principal financial covenants include maintenance of a minimum net worth , defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock , plus any goodwill impairment charges , of $ 9 billion ; and a maximum total debt to capital ratio , defined as total debt divided by total debt plus net worth , of maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy .

in millions the total debt ( a ) of 2007 is $ 692 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2008 is $ 129 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2009 is $ 1143 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2010 is $ 1198 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2011 is $ 381 ; the total debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 3680 ;

in millions the total of 2007 is $ 3165 ; the total of 2008 is $ 708 ; the total of 2009 is $ 1599 ; the total of 2010 is $ 1624 ; the total of 2011 is $ 764 ; the total of thereafter is $ 5584 ;

Answer: 22%

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 due in 2008 is attributable to total debt repayments?

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was 2017 gross margin percent?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 16.1%.

Rejected response: 18%.

CDW || what was <TIME> gross margin percent?

Question: what was 2017 gross margin percent?

Answer: 16.1%

( dollars in millions ) the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2017 is $ 15191.5 ; the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2016 is $ 13981.9 ; the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 12988.7 ;

( dollars in millions ) the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2017 is 2449.9 ; the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2016 is 2327.2 ; the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 2115.8 ;

table of contents in this form 10-k , we discuss non-gaap income before income taxes , non-gaap net income , non-gaap net income per diluted share , ebitda , adjusted ebitda and adjusted ebitda margin , which are non-gaap financial measures .

( dollars in millions ) the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2017 is 59.8 ; the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2016 is 55.0 ; the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 51.1 ;

Answer: 16.1%

Question: what was 2016 gross margin percent?

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was 2016 gross margin percent?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 16.1%.

Question: what was 2016 gross margin percent?

Answer: 18%

( dollars in millions ) the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2017 is $ 15191.5 ; the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2016 is $ 13981.9 ; the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 12988.7 ;

( dollars in millions ) the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2017 is 2449.9 ; the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2016 is 2327.2 ; the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 2115.8 ;

( dollars in millions ) the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2017 is 59.8 ; the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2016 is 55.0 ; the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 51.1 ;

Answer: 18%

Question: what was 2017 gross margin percent?

Answer: 16.1%

Answer: 16.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 251%.

Rejected response: 51%.

C || what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 251%

in millions of dollars the non-interest revenue of 2008 is 438 ; the non-interest revenue of 2007 is -291 ( 291 ) ; the non-interest revenue of 2006 is -599 ( 599 ) ;

in millions of dollars The net interest revenue of 2008 is $ -1288 ( 1288 ) ; The net interest revenue of 2007 is $ -461 ( 461 ) ; The net interest revenue of 2006 is $ -345 ( 345 ) ;

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ -1288 ( 1288 ) ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ -461 ( 461 ) ; the net interest revenue of 2006 is $ -345 ( 345 ) ;

in millions of dollars the revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -850 ( 850 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -752 ( 752 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2006 is $ -944 ( 944 ) ;

Answer: 251%

Question: what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 51%

Answer: 51%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 51%.

Rejected response: 251%.

Question: what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 51%

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ -1288 ( 1288 ) ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ -461 ( 461 ) ; the net interest revenue of 2006 is $ -345 ( 345 ) ;

in millions of dollars the non-interest revenue of 2008 is 438 ; the non-interest revenue of 2007 is -291 ( 291 ) ; the non-interest revenue of 2006 is -599 ( 599 ) ;

in millions of dollars the revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -850 ( 850 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -752 ( 752 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2006 is $ -944 ( 944 ) ;

Answer: 51%

Question: what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 251%

Answer: 251%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17%.

Rejected response: 18%.

CMCSA || scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment <TIME>?

Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2007?

Answer: 17%

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2008 is 1024 ; the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2007 is 1014 ; the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2006 is 906 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total of 2008 is $ 5545 ; the total of 2007 is $ 5993 ; the total of 2006 is $ 4244 ;

the table below summarizes the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable segment from 2006 through 2008. .

Answer: 17%

Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2008?

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 17%.

Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2008?

Answer: 18%

the table below summarizes the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable segment from 2006 through 2008. .

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2008 is 1024 ; the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2007 is 1014 ; the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2006 is 906 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total of 2008 is $ 5545 ; the total of 2007 is $ 5993 ; the total of 2006 is $ 4244 ;

Answer: 18%

Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2007?

Answer: 17%

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2006 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11%.

Rejected response: 13%.

IP || <TIME> what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Question: in 2006 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Answer: 11%

in millions the consumer packaging of 2006 is 116 ; the consumer packaging of 2005 is 126 ; the consumer packaging of 2004 is 198 ;

in millions the total from continuing operations of 2006 is $ 1009 ; the total from continuing operations of 2005 is $ 992 ; the total from continuing operations of 2004 is $ 925 ;

the following table presents capital spending from continuing operations by each of our business segments for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .

capital spending from continuing operations was $ 1.0 billion in 2006 , or 87% ( 87 % ) of depreciation and amortization , comparable to $ 992 million , or 78% ( 78 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2005 , and $ 925 mil- lion , or 73% ( 73 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2004 .

Answer: 11%

Question: in 2005 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Answer: 13%

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2005 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 11%.

Question: in 2005 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Answer: 13%

capital spending from continuing operations was $ 1.0 billion in 2006 , or 87% ( 87 % ) of depreciation and amortization , comparable to $ 992 million , or 78% ( 78 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2005 , and $ 925 mil- lion , or 73% ( 73 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2004 .

in millions the consumer packaging of 2006 is 116 ; the consumer packaging of 2005 is 126 ; the consumer packaging of 2004 is 198 ;

in millions the total from continuing operations of 2006 is $ 1009 ; the total from continuing operations of 2005 is $ 992 ; the total from continuing operations of 2004 is $ 925 ;

Answer: 13%

Question: in 2006 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Answer: 11%

Answer: 11%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18.2%.

Rejected response: 32.3%.

AMT || what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 18.2%

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 approximated $ 655.0 million , $ 495.2 million and $ 419.0 million , respectively. .

in addition , on february 16 , 2012 , tristar brought a federal action against the company in the united states district court for the northern district of texas ( the 201cdistrict court 201d ) , in which tristar principally alleged that the company made misrepresentations to landowners when competing with tristar for land under the company 2019s owned or managed sites .

on january 22 , 2013 , the company filed an amended answer and counterclaim against tristar and certain of its employees , denying tristar 2019s claims and asserting that tristar engaged in a pattern of unlawful activity , including : ( i ) entering into agreements not to compete for land under certain towers ; and ( ii ) making widespread misrepresentations to landowners regarding both tristar and the company .

such payments at december 31 , 2014 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

Answer: 18.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 32.3%

pursuant to a settlement agreement dated july 9 , 2014 , all pending state and federal actions between the company and tristar were dismissed with prejudice and without payment of damages .

Answer: 32.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 32.3%.

Rejected response: 18.2%.

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 32.3%

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 approximated $ 655.0 million , $ 495.2 million and $ 419.0 million , respectively. .

Answer: 32.3%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 18.2%

such payments at december 31 , 2014 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

Answer: 18.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 45%.

Rejected response: 46%.

JPM || what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2013?

Answer: 45%

( in millions ) the net interest income of 2014 is 43634 ; the net interest income of 2013 is 43319 ; the net interest income of 2012 is 44910 ;

( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2014 is $ 94205 ; the total net revenue of 2013 is $ 96606 ; the total net revenue of 2012 is $ 97031 ;

2014 compared with 2013 total net revenue for 2014 was down by $ 2.4 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared with the prior year , predominantly due to lower mortgage fees and related income , and lower other income .

Answer: 45%

Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2014?

Answer: 46%

Answer: 46%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 46%.

Rejected response: 45%.

Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2014?

Answer: 46%

( in millions ) the net interest income of 2014 is 43634 ; the net interest income of 2013 is 43319 ; the net interest income of 2012 is 44910 ;

( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2014 is $ 94205 ; the total net revenue of 2013 is $ 96606 ; the total net revenue of 2012 is $ 97031 ;

2014 compared with 2013 total net revenue for 2014 was down by $ 2.4 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared with the prior year , predominantly due to lower mortgage fees and related income , and lower other income .

Answer: 46%

Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2013?

Answer: 45%

Answer: 45%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses from 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5.1%.

Rejected response: -7.3%.

AMT || what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: -5.1%

as a result , the company recorded impairment charges and net losses of approximately $ 16.8 million , $ 17.7 million and $ 19.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , respectively .

2022 non-core asset impairment charges 2014during the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 respectively , the company sold a limited number of non-core towers and other non-core assets and recorded impairment charges to write-down these and other non-core assets to net realizable value .

such charges are reflected in impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 .

impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense the significant components reflected in impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations include the following : impairments and net loss on sale of long-lived assets 2014during the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , the company recorded impairments and net loss on sale of long-lived assets ( primarily related to its rental and management segment ) of $ 19.1 million , $ 22.3 million and $ 28.3 million , respectively .

the total of liability as of january 1 2003 is $ 3632 ; the total of 2003 restructuring expense is $ 2266 ; the total of 2003 cash payments is $ -2209 ( 2209 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2003 is $ 3689 ; the total of 2004 restructuring expense is $ 692 ; the total of 2004 cash payments is $ -3285 ( 3285 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 1096 ; the total of 2005 restructuring expense is $ 96 ; the total of 2005 cash payments is $ -773 ( 773 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 419 ;

Answer: -5.1%

Question: what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: -7.3%

during the year ended december 31 , 2003 , the company sold approximately 300 non-core towers and certain other non-core assets and recorded impairment charges to write-down these and other non-core assets to net realizable value .

Answer: -7.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses from 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -7.3%.

Rejected response: -5.1%.

Question: what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: -7.3%

impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense the significant components reflected in impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations include the following : impairments and net loss on sale of long-lived assets 2014during the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , the company recorded impairments and net loss on sale of long-lived assets ( primarily related to its rental and management segment ) of $ 19.1 million , $ 22.3 million and $ 28.3 million , respectively .

during the year ended december 31 , 2003 , the company sold approximately 300 non-core towers and certain other non-core assets and recorded impairment charges to write-down these and other non-core assets to net realizable value .

as a result , the company recorded impairment charges and net losses of approximately $ 16.8 million , $ 17.7 million and $ 19.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , respectively .

Answer: -7.3%

Question: what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: -5.1%

the total of liability as of january 1 2003 is $ 3632 ; the total of 2003 restructuring expense is $ 2266 ; the total of 2003 cash payments is $ -2209 ( 2209 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2003 is $ 3689 ; the total of 2004 restructuring expense is $ 692 ; the total of 2004 cash payments is $ -3285 ( 3285 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 1096 ; the total of 2005 restructuring expense is $ 96 ; the total of 2005 cash payments is $ -773 ( 773 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 419 ;

Answer: -5.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2003?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 63.0%.

Rejected response: 69.0%.

ETR || what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool <TIME>?

Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2003?

Answer: 63.0%

system energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

money pool activity used $ 42.5 million of system energy's operating cash flows in 2004 , used $ 12.0 million in 2003 , and provided $ 6.8 million in 2002 .

Answer: 63.0%

Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2004?

Answer: 69.0%

management's financial discussion and analysis operating activities cash flow from operations increased by $ 232.1 million in 2004 primarily due to income tax refunds of $ 70.6 million in 2004 compared to income tax payments of $ 230.9 million in 2003 .

Answer: 69.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2004?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 69.0%.

Rejected response: 63.0%.

Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2004?

Answer: 69.0%

management's financial discussion and analysis operating activities cash flow from operations increased by $ 232.1 million in 2004 primarily due to income tax refunds of $ 70.6 million in 2004 compared to income tax payments of $ 230.9 million in 2003 .

money pool activity used $ 42.5 million of system energy's operating cash flows in 2004 , used $ 12.0 million in 2003 , and provided $ 6.8 million in 2002 .

Answer: 69.0%

Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2003?

Answer: 63.0%

system energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

Answer: 63.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 are due in 2002?
Reference time interval: 2001-12-31 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12%.

Rejected response: 8%.

AES || what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt <TIME> are due <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 are due in 2002?

Answer: 12%

future maturities of debt 2014scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 , are ( in millions ) : .

as of december 31 , 2001 , $ 496 million was available .

Answer: 12%

Question: what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 are due in 2005?

Answer: 8%

2002 the thereafter of $ 2672 is 12806 ;

Answer: 8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 are due in 2005?
Reference time interval: 2001-12-31 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8%.

Rejected response: 12%.

Question: what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 are due in 2005?

Answer: 8%

2002 the thereafter of $ 2672 is 12806 ;

Answer: 8%

Question: what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 are due in 2002?

Answer: 12%

Answer: 12%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10.6%.

Rejected response: 21.3%.

ECL || what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate <TIME>?

Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2016?

Answer: 10.6%

the statutory u.s . rate of 2017 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . rate of 2016 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . rate of 2015 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ;

the effective income tax rate of 2017 is 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) ; the effective income tax rate of 2016 is 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) ; the effective income tax rate of 2015 is 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) ;

federal income tax rate to the company 2019s effective income tax rate is as follows: .

the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2017 is 0.4 ; the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2016 is 0.9 ; the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2015 is 0.4 ;

Answer: 10.6%

Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2017?

Answer: 21.3%

Answer: 21.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 21.3%.

Rejected response: 10.6%.

Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2017?

Answer: 21.3%

the statutory u.s . rate of 2017 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . rate of 2016 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . rate of 2015 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ;

the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2017 is 0.4 ; the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2016 is 0.9 ; the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2015 is 0.4 ;

the effective income tax rate of 2017 is 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) ; the effective income tax rate of 2016 is 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) ; the effective income tax rate of 2015 is 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) ;

Answer: 21.3%

Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2016?

Answer: 10.6%

Answer: 10.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2009 trading assets , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 257839.

Rejected response: 305261.

JPM || excluding derivatives , what are net <TIME> trading assets , in millions?

Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2009 trading assets , in millions?

Answer: 257839

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2009 is $ 318063 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2008 is $ 384102 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2007 is $ 381415 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2009 is $ 60224 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2008 is $ 78841 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2007 is $ 94737 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) The trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; The trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; The trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2009 is 77901 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2008 is 93200 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2007 is 65198 ;

Answer: 257839

Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2008 trading assets , in millions?

Answer: 305261

Answer: 305261


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2008 trading assets , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 305261.

Rejected response: 257839.

Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2008 trading assets , in millions?

Answer: 305261

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2009 is $ 318063 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2008 is $ 384102 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2007 is $ 381415 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2009 is 77901 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2008 is 93200 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2007 is 65198 ;

Answer: 305261

Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2009 trading assets , in millions?

Answer: 257839

Answer: 257839


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -13636.

Rejected response: -5781.

AMT || what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2006?

Answer: -13636

employee separations the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2005 $ 20963 is liability as of december 31 2005 $ 20963 ; the employee separations of 2006 expense $ 496 is 2006 expense $ 496 ; the employee separations of 2006 cash payments $ -12389 ( 12389 ) is 2006 cash payments $ -12389 ( 12389 ) ; the employee separations of other $ -1743 ( 1743 ) is other $ -1743 ( 1743 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2006 $ 7327 is liability as of december 31 2006 $ 7327 ; the employee separations of 2007 expense $ 633 is 2007 expense $ 633 ; the employee separations of 2007 cash payments $ -6110 ( 6110 ) is 2007 cash payments $ -6110 ( 6110 ) ; the employee separations of other $ -304 ( 304 ) is other $ -304 ( 304 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2007 $ 1546 is liability as of december 31 2007 $ 1546 ; the employee separations of 2008 expense $ 284 is 2008 expense $ 284 ; the employee separations of 2008 cash payments $ -1901 ( 1901 ) is 2008 cash payments $ -1901 ( 1901 ) ; the employee separations of other $ 71 is other $ 71 ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2008 2014 is liability as of december 31 2008 2014 ;

in addition , the company also incurred certain merger related costs for additional employee retention and separation costs incurred during the year ended december 31 , 2006 .

these costs were recognized as an assumed liability in the purchase price allocation .

Answer: -13636

Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2005?

Answer: -5781

merger related expense 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company assumed certain obligations , as a result of the merger with spectrasite , inc. , primarily related to employee separation costs of former spectrasite employees .

Answer: -5781


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5781.

Rejected response: -13636.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2005?

Answer: -5781

employee separations the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2005 $ 20963 is liability as of december 31 2005 $ 20963 ; the employee separations of 2006 expense $ 496 is 2006 expense $ 496 ; the employee separations of 2006 cash payments $ -12389 ( 12389 ) is 2006 cash payments $ -12389 ( 12389 ) ; the employee separations of other $ -1743 ( 1743 ) is other $ -1743 ( 1743 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2006 $ 7327 is liability as of december 31 2006 $ 7327 ; the employee separations of 2007 expense $ 633 is 2007 expense $ 633 ; the employee separations of 2007 cash payments $ -6110 ( 6110 ) is 2007 cash payments $ -6110 ( 6110 ) ; the employee separations of other $ -304 ( 304 ) is other $ -304 ( 304 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2007 $ 1546 is liability as of december 31 2007 $ 1546 ; the employee separations of 2008 expense $ 284 is 2008 expense $ 284 ; the employee separations of 2008 cash payments $ -1901 ( 1901 ) is 2008 cash payments $ -1901 ( 1901 ) ; the employee separations of other $ 71 is other $ 71 ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2008 2014 is liability as of december 31 2008 2014 ;

Answer: -5781

Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2006?

Answer: -13636

Answer: -13636


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 26%.

LKQ || what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 13%

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 211.5 million , $ 168.4 million and $ 148.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment .

we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .

the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Answer: 13%

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 26%

had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2016 , our portion of the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 59.0 million .

Answer: 26%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 26%.

Rejected response: 13%.

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 26%

the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 211.5 million , $ 168.4 million and $ 148.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Answer: 26%

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 13%

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 27%.

Rejected response: 29%.

FIS || what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be <TIME>?

Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2017?

Answer: 27%

currency the euro of 2017 is 35 ; the euro of 2016 is 38 ; the euro of 2015 is 33 ;

currency the total increase or decrease of 2017 is $ 130 ; the total increase or decrease of 2016 is $ 129 ; the total increase or decrease of 2015 is $ 106 ;

dollar during these years compared to the preceding year .

Answer: 27%

Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2016?

Answer: 29%

Answer: 29%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 29%.

Rejected response: 27%.

Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2016?

Answer: 29%

currency the euro of 2017 is 35 ; the euro of 2016 is 38 ; the euro of 2015 is 33 ;

currency the total increase or decrease of 2017 is $ 130 ; the total increase or decrease of 2016 is $ 129 ; the total increase or decrease of 2015 is $ 106 ;

dollar during these years compared to the preceding year .

Answer: 29%

Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2017?

Answer: 27%

Answer: 27%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage rent increase between 2007 and 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 22%.

Rejected response: 5%.

IP || what was the percentage rent increase <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage rent increase between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: 22%

rent expense was $ 216 million , $ 205 million and $ 168 million for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

deferred income taxes are not provided for tempo- rary differences of approximately $ 3.5 billion , $ 2.6 billion and $ 3.7 billion as of december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , representing earnings of non-u.s .

the company recorded an income tax provision for 2007 of $ 415 million , including a $ 41 million benefit related to the effective settlement of tax audits , and $ 8 million of other tax benefits .

$ 190 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before equity earnings .

excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 423 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before equity earnings .

Answer: 22%

Question: what was the percentage rent increase between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 5%

additionally in 2009 , as a result of agree- ments on the 2004 and 2005 u.s .

Answer: 5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage rent increase between 2008 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5%.

Rejected response: 22%.

Question: what was the percentage rent increase between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 5%

$ 190 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before equity earnings .

excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 423 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before equity earnings .

rent expense was $ 216 million , $ 205 million and $ 168 million for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

Answer: 5%

Question: what was the percentage rent increase between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: 22%

Answer: 22%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations between 2008 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -11%.

Rejected response: -8%.

BLL || what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: -11%

( $ in millions ) the cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations of 2010 is $ 515.2 ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations of 2009 is $ 559.7 ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations of 2008 is $ 627.6 ;

( $ in millions ) The cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2010 is -110.2 ( 110.2 ) ; The cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2009 is -581.4 ( 581.4 ) ; The cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2008 is -418.0 ( 418.0 ) ;

( $ in millions ) The cash flows provided by ( used in ) financing activities of 2010 is -459.6 ( 459.6 ) ; The cash flows provided by ( used in ) financing activities of 2009 is 100.8 ; The cash flows provided by ( used in ) financing activities of 2008 is -205.5 ( 205.5 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2010 is -110.2 ( 110.2 ) ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2009 is -581.4 ( 581.4 ) ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2008 is -418.0 ( 418.0 ) ;

excluding the $ 250 million impact of additional accounts receivable from the change in accounting discussed above , cash flows provided by operations were $ 765.2 million in 2010 compared to $ 559.7 million in 2009 and $ 627.6 million in 2008 .

Answer: -11%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations between 2009 and 2010?

Answer: -8%

Answer: -8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations between 2009 and 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -8%.

Rejected response: -11%.

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations between 2009 and 2010?

Answer: -8%

( $ in millions ) the cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations of 2010 is $ 515.2 ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations of 2009 is $ 559.7 ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations of 2008 is $ 627.6 ;

( $ in millions ) the cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2010 is -110.2 ( 110.2 ) ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2009 is -581.4 ( 581.4 ) ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2008 is -418.0 ( 418.0 ) ;

excluding the $ 250 million impact of additional accounts receivable from the change in accounting discussed above , cash flows provided by operations were $ 765.2 million in 2010 compared to $ 559.7 million in 2009 and $ 627.6 million in 2008 .

Answer: -8%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: -11%

Answer: -11%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill from 2015 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10.4%.

Rejected response: 12.3%.

ECL || what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill from 2015 to 2017?

Answer: 10.4%

( millions ) the december 31 2015 of global industrial is $ 2560.8 ; the december 31 2015 of global institutional is $ 662.7 ; the december 31 2015 of global energy is $ 3151.5 ; the december 31 2015 of other is $ 115.8 ; the december 31 2015 of total is $ 6490.8 ;

( millions ) the december 31 2017 of global industrial is $ 2797.0 ; the december 31 2017 of global institutional is $ 1027.0 ; the december 31 2017 of global energy is $ 3203.7 ; the december 31 2017 of other is $ 139.4 ; the december 31 2017 of total is $ 7167.1 ;

( millions ) The segment change ( a ) of global industrial is 62.7 ; The segment change ( a ) of global institutional is -62.7 ( 62.7 ) ; The segment change ( a ) of global energy is - ; The segment change ( a ) of other is - ; The segment change ( a ) of total is - ;

( millions ) the december 31 2016 of global industrial is $ 2585.0 ; the december 31 2016 of global institutional is $ 590.7 ; the december 31 2016 of global energy is $ 3093.6 ; the december 31 2016 of other is $ 113.7 ; the december 31 2016 of total is $ 6383.0 ;

Answer: 10.4%

Question: what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 12.3%

Answer: 12.3%